alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-06071 |
|------------------------------------|-----------|

 

DWS Institutional Funds

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 12/31 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 12/31/08 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 3009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1101]

[[Page 3009]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities Arts and Artifacts 
Indemnity Panel Advisory Committee

AGENCY: The National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463 as amended) notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel of the Federal Council on the 
Arts and the Humanities will be held at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20506, in Room 730, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., on Monday, 
February 6, 2012.
    The purpose of the meeting is to review applications for 
Certificates of Indemnity submitted to the Federal Council on the Arts 
and the Humanities for exhibitions beginning after April 1, 2012.
    Because the proposed meeting will consider financial and commercial 
data and because it is important to keep values of objects, methods of 
transportation and security measures confidential, pursuant to the 
authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to Close 
Advisory Committee Meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have determined 
that the meeting would fall within exemption (4) of 5 U.S.C. 552(b) and 
that it is essential to close the meeting to protect the free exchange 
of views and to avoid interference with the operations of the 
Committee.
    It is suggested that those desiring more specific information 
contact Advisory Committee Management Officer, Lisette Voyatzis, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20506, or call (202) 606-8322.

Lisette Voyatzis,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-1101 Filed 1-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Microfield
      Group, Inc. (t he
      "Company") for the twelve months ended December 30, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"),
      I,
      the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
      certify that:





The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of this 15th day of
      March 2007 .








/s/RODNEY
                M. BOUCHERRodney
                M. BoucherChief
                Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-97579, 333-89030, 333-122986, 333-121165, and 333-121160 on Form S-8 of our reports dated August 25, 2009, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of SRAInternational, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretationof FASB Statement No. 109*) and the effectiveness of SRA International, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting dated August 25, 2009, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of SRA International Inc. for theyear ended June 30, 2009. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

McLean, Virginia 

August 25, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROGER A. HORNBROOK, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 09-40 Erie

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTURE, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff’s social security complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on

February 25, 2009 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise

Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13], filed on July

23, 2010, recommended that the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No.

11] be denied, and that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 9] be

denied to the extent it requests an award of benefits, but granted to the extent it seeks

a vacatur of the administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security and a

remand for further administrative proceedings. The parties were allowed fourteen (14)

days from the date of service to file objections. No objections were filed. After de novo

review of the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation,

the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 10 day of August, 2010; th

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment

[Doc. No. 11] is DENIED; and the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 9]

is DENIED insofar as it seeks an award of benefits, but GRANTED insofar as it seeks a

vacatur of the Defendant’s administrative decision and a remand for further

proceedings. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is hereby VACATED

and the case REMANDED to him for further administrative proceedings. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

Case 1:09-cv-00040-SJM-SPB Document 14 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 2
on July 23, 2010, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. 

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

2

Case 1:09-cv-00040-SJM-SPB Document 14 Filed 08/10/10 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                     HMH PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                            SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES



          HMH Rivers, Inc.
          Marriott SBM Two Corporation
          HMH WTC, Inc.
          HMC Retirement Properties, Inc.
          HMH Pentagon Corporation
          HMH Marina, Inc.
          Host Airport Hotels, Inc.
          Marriott Financial Services, Inc.
          HMH HPT Residence Inn, Inc.
          HMC SFO, Inc.
          HMC AP Canada, Inc.
          HMC Manhattan Beach, Inc.
          HMH Norfolk, Inc.
          Marriott PLP Corporation
          Marriott Desert Springs Corporation
          Host/Interstate Partnership, L.P.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Objective Communications, Inc. (a development stage enterprise) on Form S-3
(File No. 333-20625), Form S-8 (File No. 333-49763) and Form S-8 (File No.
333-49765) of our report, dated February 26, 1999, except for Note 14, as to
which the date is April 14, 1999, on our audits of the financial statements of
Objective Communications, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the
years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 and for the period October 5, 1993
(date of inception) to December 31, 1998, which report is included in Objective
Communications, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A.



                                                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
May 13, 1999
Case 1:05-cv-00346-MBC   Document 8   Filed 07/10/06   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00346-MBC   Document 8   Filed 07/10/06   Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this annual report on Form
10-K of SRA International, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Ernst Volgenau, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          |  |                                                                                  
|------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 10, 2004 |  | /s/ ERNST VOLGENAU                                                               
|                          |  | Ernst Volgenau Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                     107,672,971
<SECURITIES>                                22,359,232
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,284,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,532,907
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               954,288
<PP&E>                                      23,731,900
<DEPRECIATION>                            (13,186,825)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             171,347,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,445,936
<BONDS>                                    115,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       132,495
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,768,744
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               171,347,175
<SALES>                                     23,144,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,144,003
<CGS>                                       21,744,255
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,744,255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            34,432,334
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (2,014,173)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (31,018,413)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (31,018,413)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (31,018,413)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.35)


</TABLE>
#### Concepcion SOSA, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 76-1507.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 27, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 1977.

Ser, Keyfetz, DeCardenas & Levine and Mark Poses, Miami, for appellant.

W. Thomas Spencer, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed on the authority of *Arrieta*v. *Volkswagen Insurance Company,*343 So.2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Apodaca*v. *Old Security Casualty Insurance Company,*348 So.2d 677 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), opinion filed August 9, 1977.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED (COMBINED) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                              45
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      439
<ALLOWANCES>                                        39
<INVENTORY>                                        387
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   925
<PP&E>                                             745
<DEPRECIATION>                                     410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              414
<BONDS>                                            717
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,821
<SALES>                                          2,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,233
<CGS>                                            1,510
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     5
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  60
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    173
<INCOME-TAX>                                        78
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 95
<DISCONTINUED>                                      63
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (25)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       133
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.54
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:10-cr-00049-MBC Document 61-1 Filed 05/16/13 Page 1 of 1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 


FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. Criminal No. 10-00049-1 (Erie) 

HUGO LOPEZ, 

Defendant. 

ORDER OF COURT 

AND NOW, to-wit, this ).. J.~y of ~ , 2013, upon consideration 

of the within Motion for Return of Seized Property, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, 

AND DECREED that the Defendant's motion is granted. The Government is ordered to 

return the following property to the Defendant within ,~ days of the date of this 

Order: cell phone, wallet containing $850.00 in cash, key chain containing several keys, 

debit card, state identification card, one (1) pair of jeans, three (3) pairs of sunglasses, 

and outerwear, including one (1) pair of gloves and several thermal headbands. 

~..:.. 6. Co~,k. J. 

Ma nce B. COhill, Jr. 


Senior United States District Judge 


cc: Christian A. Trabold, AUSA 

Christy P. Foreman, Esquire 

Case 1:10-cr-00049-MBC Document 63 Filed 05/28/13 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.12

Translated From Japanese

                           Monetary Loan Certification

Mitsubishi Tokyo UFJ Bank KK

Borrower:

Address: Nishi Shinjuku Showa Bldg 11F, 1-13-12 Nishi Shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku,
         Tokyo 160-0023 Tel: 03-5909-1561   Fax: 03-5909-1562

Name:    Global Hotline KK
         Hideki Anan

Borrower shall enter into a monetary loan agreement under approving each article
in bank dealing contract with you.

Article 1: Monetary Loan

Borrower has received money form you based on conditions below.

1. Borrowing Amount: (Y)350,000,000

2. Use of proceeds: Operating capital

3. Interest rate: 2.775% annually, Ratio of damage 14%

4. Credit guarantee corporation

5. Repayment method

   (1) The first repayment date: 2007/10/31 Amount: (Y)17,500,000

       Final repayment date: 2012/7/31 (Y)17,500,000

   (2) The second repayment month: 2008/January (Y)17,500,000

       Term of repayment: until 2012/ April Every 3 months (Y)17,500,000

   (3) Repayment date is the end of month

   (4) In case repayment date is holiday, pay in the following day.

6. Interest payment method: Prepay

7. Bank account

Bank branch: Toritsu Daigaku Mae Branch

Account number: 1080373

Account holder: borrower

                                     - 1 -
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 28, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40733

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROLAND CASTRO,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(C-01-CV-495)

 

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We granted Roland Castro, federal prisoner No. 592532, a

certificate of appealability on the issue whether the district

court abused its discretion by failing to hold an evidentiary

hearing to resolve conflicting affidavits concerning Castro’s claim

that his trial attorney was ineffective for failing to call
1 Friedman v. United States, 588 F.2d 1010, 1015 (5th Cir. 1979); see

United States v. Briggs, 939 F.2d 222, 228 (5th Cir. 1991).

2

eyewitnesses Jesse Ortiz and Roque Resendez to testify at Castro’s

trial for being a felon in possession of a firearm. 

Castro alleged that Ortiz and Resendez would have testified

that Castro did not possess a firearm, and he supported his 28

U.S.C. § 2255 motion with the affidavits of Ortiz and Resendez. In

response, the Government submitted the affidavit of Castro’s trial

attorney, Assistant Federal Public Defender Robert Carlin,

explaining why he did not call Ortiz and Resendez to testify at

trial. Under the facts sworn to by counsel, the decision not to

call Ortiz and Resendez was clearly a reasonable trial strategy. 

The district court denied § 2255 relief without holding an

evidentiary hearing to resolve the conflicts in the affidavit

evidence because it concluded that Castro could not demonstrate

that he was prejudiced by counsel’s decision not to call Ortiz and

Resendez to testify. 

When facts are at issue in a § 2255 proceeding, a hearing is

required if 1) the record, as supplemented by the trial judge’s

personal knowledge or recollection, does not conclusively negate

the facts alleged in support of the claim for § 2255 relief; and 2)

the movant would be entitled to post-conviction relief as a legal

matter if his factual allegations are true.1 In this case, the

record alone does not support the district court’s finding of no

prejudice. 
2 Friedman, 588 F.2d at 1015; see United States v. McCord, 618 F.2d 389,

393-95 (5th Cir. 1980).

3

In light of the conflicting affidavit evidence, the district

court abused its discretion by denying Castro’s motion without

either holding an evidentiary hearing or citing the court’s

personal knowledge or recollection of the trial to support its

determination that Castro could not demonstrate that he was

prejudiced by counsel’s failure to call Resendez and Ortiz to

testify.2 Accordingly, the denial of § 2255 relief is vacated and

the case is remanded to the district court for proceedings

consistent with this opinion.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3218 

To require Federal agencies to notify States and localities whenever transporting migrants from locations within 100 miles of the United States 

border to their jurisdictions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2023 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself, Mr. BUDD, Mr. BRAUN, and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require Federal agencies to notify States and localities 

whenever transporting migrants from locations within 

100 miles of the United States border to their jurisdictions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Oversight of 

5 Transported Immigrants to Communities is Essential 

6 Act’’ or the ‘‘NOTICE Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3218 IS

1 SEC. 2. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Secu3 rity and the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

4 shall notify the governor of a State and the chief executive 

5 officer of a unit of local government in such State of any 

6 alien that is being transported by the Department of 

7 Homeland Security, the Department of Health and 

8 Human Services, or another entity receiving Federal fund9 ing for such transportation, from a location within 100 

10 miles of the United States border to such State and local 

11 jurisdiction before such transportation occurs. 

12 (b) INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED.—Each notifica13 tion made pursuant to subsection (a) shall include— 

14 (1) for each transported alien— 

15 (A) his or her legal name, country of ori16 gin, age, and sex; 

17 (B) any crimes for which such alien has 

18 been convicted; and 

19 (C) any criminal gang with which such 

20 alien is or has been affiliated; and 

21 (2) the types of security screenings that have 

22 been performed with respect to such aliens. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### STATE of Louisiana v. James Dewey CARR and John Quade.

No. 61053.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

In re: James Dewey Carr and John Quade applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order.

Granted. (Parish of Webster).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Monty M. Wyche, Judge of the 26th Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Webster, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 16th day of December, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this court, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.