alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer*

I, Brian J. Berchtold, the Chief
Executive Officer of ALCiS Health, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), certify pursuant to section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2007 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),
whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                      |  |                              
| |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------------
| |  | Dated: July 13, 2007
| |  |                     
| |  | By:                  |  | /s/ BRIAN J BERCHTOLD        
| |  |                      |  | Chief Executive Officer      
| |  |                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

---

|* | The material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



49
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3011 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3011

 To prohibit the Secretary of State from issuing a passport, passport 
card, or Consular Report of Birth Abroad that includes the unspecified 
            (X) gender designation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 4, 2023

   Mr. Vance (for himself, Mr. Cassidy, and Mr. Budd) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of State from issuing a passport, passport 
card, or Consular Report of Birth Abroad that includes the unspecified 
            (X) gender designation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Passport Sanity Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION REGARDING CERTAIN GENDER DESIGNATION ON PASSPORTS, 
              PASSPORT CARDS, AND CONSULAR REPORTS OF BIRTH ABROAD 
              ISSUED BY DEPARTMENT OF STATE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of State shall--
            (1) ensure each application for a covered document includes 
        only the gender designations male and female; and
            (2) prohibit the issuing of a covered document that 
        includes the unspecified (X) gender designation.
    (b) Covered Document Defined.--In this section, the term ``covered 
document'' means a passport, passport card, or Consular Report of Birth 
Abroad issued by the Department of State.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark Scott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
company for the dates and periods covered by the report.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company (or equivalent) with the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used by any person
or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.


                                        /s/ Mark E. Scott
                                        -----------------
                                        Mark E. Scott
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        April 19, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26942]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. RP97-90-003 and RP97-99-004]


Algonquin LNG, Inc.; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 1, 1997, Algonquin LNG, Inc. (ALNG), 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 83 to be effective November 1, 
1997.
    ALNG states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's Letter Order issued on July 3, 1997, in Docket Nos. RP97-
90-001 and RP97-99-002, which required ALNG to incorporate by reference 
the GISB standards as approved in the Commission's Order No. 587-C 
Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas pipelines 
issued March 4, 1997.
    ALNG states that copies of this filing were served on firm 
customers of ALNG and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary,
[FR Doc. 97-26942 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26736]



[[Page 52722]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 1, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521:
    1. MBNA Corporation, Wilmington, Delaware; to acquire 100 percent 
of the voting shares of MBNA Amercia Bank (Delaware), Wilmington, 
Delaware.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 3, 
1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-26736 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
TransTexas Gas Corporation (the "Company") on Form S-3 (33-91494) of our report,
which contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern, dated May 20, 1999, on our audits of the Company's
financial statements and financial statement schedules as of January 31, 1999
and 1998, and for the years ended January 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, which report
is included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Houston, Texas
May 20, 1999
#### Herbert NEWSOME, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-252.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 13, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### Mrs. Flora LINDER, for & on behalf of Paul Tucker, a Minor v. Mrs. Joan Tucker SMITH.

No. 45443.

Supremo Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 20, 1969.

Bidwell Adam, Gulfport, Forrest B. Jackson, Jackson, for appellant.

Albert Sidney Johnston, III, Pascagoula, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF SHILOH INDUSTRIES, INC.

The following is a list of the subsidiaries of
Shiloh Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Corporation). The common stock of all the corporations listed below is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by the Corporation. If indented, the Corporation is a wholly owned
subsidiary of the corporation under which it is listed unless otherwise noted.



|                                                       |  |                      
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------
|NAME OF CORPORATION                                    |  | STATE OFINCORPORATION
|Shiloh Corporation                                     |  | Ohio                 
|The Sectional Die Company                              |  | Ohio                 
|Sectional Stamping, Inc.                               |  | Ohio                 
|Medina Blanking, Inc.(1)                               |  | Ohio                 
|Liverpool Coil Processing, Incorporated                |  | Ohio                 
|VCS Properties, LLC                                    |  | Ohio                 
|Greenfield Die & Manufacturing Corp.                   |  | Michigan             
|Shiloh Incorporated                                    |  | Michigan             
|C & H Design Company                                   |  | Michigan             
|Jefferson Blanking Inc.                                |  | Georgia              
|Shiloh Automotive, Inc.                                |  | Ohio                 
|Shiloh de Mexico S.A. de C.V.(2)                       |  | Mexico               
|Shiloh International S.A. de C.V.(3)                   |  | Mexico               
|Shiloh Industries, Inc. Dickson Manufacturing Division |  | Tennessee            



|(1) | Medina Blanking, Inc. is 22% owned by the Corporation and 78% owned by Shiloh Corporation.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Shiloh de Mexico S.A. de C.V. is owned 99% by the Corporation and 1% by Medina Blanking, Inc.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Shiloh International S.A. de C.V. is owned 98% by the Corporation and 2% by Shiloh de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In her “petition to inspect grand jury minutes” (Doc. 268), defendant alleges 1

in conclusory fashion that “matters occurred before the said Grand Jury which may

constitute grounds for a petition to dismiss the indictment.” (Doc. 268 at 2).

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 4:07-CR-0422

:

v. : (Judge Conner)

:

ALBERT LEO BERRETTINI, JR., :

and MARY ANN BERRETTINI, :

:

Defendants :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2010, upon consideration of the

“petition to inspect grand jury minutes” (Doc. 268), filed by defendant Mary Ann

Berrettini, wherein defendant requests an order permitting her to inspect the

minutes of certain grand jury proceedings (see Doc. 268 at 1-2), and upon further

consideration of the “petition for disclosure” (Doc. 270), filed by defendant Mary

Ann Berrettini, wherein defendant seeks the disclosure of “information pertaining

to any of The grand jury witness’ [sic] in the above-captioned proceeding,” (Doc.

270 at 1), and the court concluding that defendant has failed to show that a ground

may exist to dismiss the indictment because of a matter that occurred before the

grand jury, see FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e)(3)(E)(ii), and the court noting that the 1

government has given defendant the materials to which she is entitled, (see Doc.

Case 4:07-cr-00422-CCC Document 310 Filed 02/22/10 Page 1 of 2
292 at 11-13), it is hereby ORDERED that the “petition to inspect grand jury

minutes” (Doc. 268) and the “petition for disclosure” (Doc. 270) are DENIED.

 S/ Christopher C. Conner 

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge

Case 4:07-cr-00422-CCC Document 310 Filed 02/22/10 Page 2 of 2
PROMISSORY NOTE

                                                Dated:       February 21, 2001

Principal Amount: $89,236.20                    State of Colorado

      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby jointly and severally promise
to pay to the order of Matrix Bancorp, Inc. the sum of eighty-nine thousand two
hundred thirty-six and 20/100 dollars ($89,236.20), together with interest
thereon at the rate of Prime per annum on the unpaid balance. Said sum shall be
paid in the manner following:

      All principal and interest shall be due on February 21, 2002.

      All payments shall be first applied to interest and the balance to
principal. This note may be prepaid, at any time, in whole or in part, without
penalty. All prepayments shall be applied in reverse order of maturity.

      This note shall at the option of any holder hereof be immediately due and
payable upon the failure to make any payment due hereunder within five (5) days
of its due date.

      This note at the option of any holder hereof may be extended on an annual
basis for increments of one (1) year. The terms and interest rate will remain
constant.

      In the event this note shall be in default, and placed with an attorney
for collection, then the undersigned agree to pay all reasonable attorney's fees
and costs of collection. Payments not made within five (5) days of due date
shall be subject to a late charge of 2% of said payment. All payments hereunder
shall be made to such address as may from time to time be designed by any holder
hereof.

      The undersigned and all other parties to this note, whether as endorsers,
guarantors or sureties, agree to remain fully bound hereunder until this note
shall be fully paid and waive demand, presentment and protest and all notices
thereto and further agree to remain bound, notwithstanding any extension,
renewal, modification, waiver, or other indulgence by any holder or upon the
discharge or release of any obligor hereunder to this note, or upon the
exchange, substitution, or release of any collateral granted as security for
this note. No modification or indulgence by any holder hereof shall be binding
unless in writing; and any indulgence on any one occasion shall not be an
indulgence for any other or future occasion. Any modification or change of
terms, hereunder granted by any holder hereof, shall be valid and binding upon
each of the undersigned, notwithstanding the acknowledgment of any of the
undersigned, and each of the undersigned does hereby irrevocably grant to each
of the others a power of attorney to enter into any such modification on their
behalf. The rights of any holder hereof shall be cumulative and not necessarily
successive. This note shall take effect as sealed instrument and shall be
construed, governed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the state first
appearing at the head of this note. The undersigned hereby execute this note as
principals and not as sureties.
<PAGE>

Maker:
/s/ Thomas P. Cronin
-------------------------------
Thomas P. Cronin
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RONALD G. DANDAR, )

Petitioner ) Civil Action No. 06-46 Erie

) District Judge McLaughlin

v. ) Magistrate Judge Baxter

)

SUPERINTENDENT DAVID GOOD, et al., )

Respondents. )

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2006, after Petitioner presented a petition for a

writ of habeas corpus which he seeks leave to prosecute in forma pauperis, and it appearing that

he has an average monthly balance of $ 56.46 in his account at the State Correctional Institution

at Cresson, Pennsylvania, which sum far exceeds the $5.00 filing fee required to commence this

action, and it further appearing that requiring the Petitioner to pay the filing fee will not deprive

him of any necessities of life at the prison, 

It is recommended that leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied.

Petitioner shall have ten (10) days from the date of service in which to file written

objections to this Report and Recommendation. Failure to file timely objections may constitute a

waiver of any appellate rights.

 S/Susan Paradise Baxter 

 SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge

cc: Ronald G. Dandar # AP-6933

 SCI Cresson 

Old Route 22

Box A

Cresson, PA 16699-0001

Case 1:06-cv-00046-KRG-SPB Document 4 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 1
#### Thomas T. LIETCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-635.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 30, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 1971.

Michael F. Cycmanick and James M. Russ of Law Offices of James M. Russ, Orlando, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevm, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Rodney Durrance, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The information under which the defendant was convicted charged defendant in three counts with unlawful possession of a central nervous system stimulant and a barbiturate in violation of F.S.1967, section 404.02(4), F.S.A. A jury found the defendant guilty on each count. Thereafter a separate adjudication and sentence were entered on each verdict. Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a term of six months to two years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. The evidence showed that possession of the drugs occurred at the same time and place. The appellant contends and the State agrees that the evidence demonstrates that the violations charged to the defendant under the separate counts were merely different facets of the same criminal transaction. We concur. Therefore, the adjudications of guilt are affirmed, but the cause is remanded to the trial court to vacate the present sentences and to enter a single sentence for six months to two years. See Simmons v. State, 1942, 151 Fla. 778, 10 So.2d 436; Norwood v. State, Fla.1956, *86*So.2d 427; Bullard v. State, Fla.App.1963, *204151 So.2d 343; and Wyche v. State, Fla. App.1965,178 So.2d 875.

We have reviewed all other points argued in the appellant’s brief and are of the opinion that they do not demonstrate error or require discussion.

Remanded with instructions.

WALDEN, REED and OWEN, JJ„ concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25382]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-61-008]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

September 19, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 16, 1997, NorAm Gas Transmission 
Company (NGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet to be 
effective November 1, 1997:

Third Revised Sheet No. 306

    NGT states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
letter order issued in this docket on June 30, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such protests 
must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25382 Filed 9-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M