This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains documents other than rules or

proposed rules that are applicable to the

public. Notices of hearings and investigations,

committee meetings, agency decisions and

rulings, delegations of authority, filing of

petitions and applications and agency

statements of organization and functions are

examples of documents appearing in this

section.

Notices Federal Register

5200

Vol. 62, No. 23

Tuesday, February 4, 1997

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Western Washington Cascades

Province Interagency Executive

Committee (PIEC) Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: The Western Washington

Cascades PIEC Advisory Committee will

meet on February 27, 1997 at the Mount

Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest

Headquarters, 21905 64th Avenue West,

in Mountlake Terrace, Washington. The

meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and

continue until about 4:00 p.m. Agenda

items to be covered include: (1)

discussion of logistics, operating

procedures, and expected

accomplishments under the renewed

charter; (2) updates on watershed

analyses completed or in progress,

Adaptive Management Area plans, the

Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest

fiscal year 1997 flood repair and

watershed restoration program, and

other current issues; (3) update on the

River Basin Information Management

framework project begun under the

auspices of the previous Advisory

Committee, and a demonstration of the

Environmental Protection Agency’s

Environmental Information

Management System (EIMS); (4)

planned review and revision of the Mt.

Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest

monitoring and evaluation strategy; and,

(5) open public forum. All Western

Washington Cascades Province

Advisory Committee meetings are open

to the public. Interested citizens are

encouraged to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting

to Chris Hansen-Murray, Province

Liaison, USDA, Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie

National Forest, 21905 64th Avenue

West, Mountlake Terrace, Washington

98043, 206–744–3276.

Dated: January 28, 1997.

Dennis E. Bschor,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 97–2680 Filed 2–3–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–11–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[Docket No. A–427–812]

Calcium Aluminate Flux From France;

Final Results of Antidumping Duty

Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of final results of

antidumping duty administrative

review.

SUMMARY: On August 2, 1996, the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) published the preliminary

results of its 1994–95 administrative

review of the antidumping duty order

on calcium aluminate flux from France

(CA flux) (61 FR 40396). The review

covers one manufacturer/exporter,

Lafarge Aluminate Flux, Inc. (Lafarge),

for the period June 15, 1994, through

May 31, 1995.

We gave interested parties an

opportunity to comment on our

preliminary results. On September 3,

1996, we received a case brief from the

sole respondent, Lafarge. Based on our

analysis of the comments received, we

have made changes, primarily clerical in

nature, to these final results.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 4, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Maureen McPhillips or Linda Ludwig,

Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Group

III, Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,

DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–3019 or

482–3833, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On August 2, 1996, the Department

published in the Federal Register (61

FR 40396) the preliminary results of the

antidumping duty order on calcium

aluminate flux from France (59 FR

30337). The Department has now

completed this administrative review in

accordance with section 751 of the

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the

Tariff Act).

We received a case brief from the sole

respondent, Lafarge, on September 3,

1996. The petitioners did not file a case

brief.

Applicable Statute and Regulations

Unless otherwise stated, all citations

to the Tariff Act are references to the

provisions effective January 1, 1995, the

effective date of the amendments made

to the Tariff Act by the Uruguay Round

Agreements Act (URAA). In addition,

unless otherwise indicated, all citations

to the Department’s regulations are to

the current regulations, as amended by

the interim regulations published in the

Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60

FR 25130).

Scope of the Review

Imports covered by this review are

shipments of CA Flux, other than white,

high purity CA flux. This product

contains by weight more than 32

percent but less than 65 percent

alumina and more than one percent

each of iron and silica.

CA flux is currently classified under

the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

United States (HTSUS) subheading

2523.10.000. The HTSUS is provided for

convenience and U.S. Customs’

purposes only. The written description

of the scope of this order remains

dispositive. This review covers the

period June 15, 1994 through May 31,

1995.

Analysis of Comments Received

Comment 1: Lafarge states that the

Department in its computer program

failed to convert two home market

variables from metric tons to short tons

to ensure accurate comparisons to the

U.S. sales amounts in short tons. In

addition, two variables expressed as

amounts per short ton were incorrectly

multiplied by the quantity expressed in

metric tons.

Department’s Position: As stated in

our calculation memorandum, dated

August 16, 1996, we intended to convert

all home market sales variables from

metric tons to short tons and have done

so for these final results.

Comment 2: Lafarge contends that we

used an incorrect variable when

calculating total movement expenses.