alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[111th Congress Private Law 1]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page ]]

Private Law 111-1
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 For the relief of Shigeru Yamada. <<NOTE: Dec. 22, 2010 -  [S. 4010]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SHIGERU YAMADA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Shigeru 
Yamada shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent 
residence upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa 
under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Shigeru Yamada enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Shigeru 
Yamada shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) and (b) shall 
apply only if the application for issuance of an immigrant visa or the 
application for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees not 
later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Shigeru Yamada, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or subsequent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of birth of Shigeru 
Yamada under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of birth of Shigeru 
Yamada under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)).
    (e) PAYGO.--The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 
complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go-Act of 2010, shall be 
determined by reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary 
Effects of PAYGO Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in 
the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate Budget

[[Page ]]

Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 
vote on passage.

    Approved December 22, 2010.
```
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC

KNIGHTDALE AIRPORT, INC AND CARLINA, INC. COMPLAINANT

v. COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, NORTH CAROLINA, TRIANGLE NORTH EXECUTIVE AIRPORT RESPONDENT. FAA Docket No. 16-13-08

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based onthe abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance withFAA Rules of Practicefor Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcementProceedings, 14 CPR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CPRPart 16, subpart B, the date by whichthe Director's Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to February 17,2015.
An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

Randall S. Fiertz Director, Airport Compliance

and Management AnalysisCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE



## sr~/ I HEREBY CERTIFY that onJanuary , 2015, I caused to be placed inthe United States mail (fust class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension ofTime to February 17, 2015, for FAA Docket 16-13-08 addressed to: Counsels for Complainant: John R. Copley, Esq. Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach, PC 1200 NewHampshire NW Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 jcopley(a]ggh-airlaw.com Counsel for Respondent: David R. Guin, Esq. Batton & Guin Attorneys at Law P.O. Box 603 107 S. Main Street Louisburg, NC 27549. Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAAAirport Compliance andManagement Analysis, AC0-100

ClaudiaRoberts Office ofAirport Compliance and

Management Analysis
#### Ernest Lee CHRISTOPHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-834.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 16, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
. I 

, 

OFFICE OF THR ATTORNEY GENERAL OF’ ‘TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

o f r ueh huJ8 

prov8m8ntr to 

9 

thearmagauitdeHPlb4dabofo and per 

0Testothom@Mlenupanthe0~ 

tloa of lib repaL, the growed or the 

8dd la8uMmo pollolert 

The fun48 %a:qwrtlon am thr yroeee48 of ln8uranoo 

qul’tUtmae~8 ruelved tmdw moh polldon kaau8e of dana@ 

t0 OTdO8tFU8tiOROiOWhhPfJUoO;r 

to the Vnlwreit~ Ava4labl@ l"uM. 

propetly 8hoald be oredited 

xt &.8 Mt v to ckterriru rrhsthar 8UOh fUll48 

are ~inaaaog 8ithin the m8a&ng of OUptar 221, suprag if timy 

we 80 oozuldond, tbn unbr tha 04WO88 proVieion8 of !-ectlon 

5 of th8t Aot, tb fbad8 mu& bo depo8ited with the State Trea8- 

umr. Ifthoy~mt8or* 

P 

d, thea thu fUnda 8Z'O not within the lxaeptionn eoa@lnod ohptw6al# 8U&Wb,8lSd undw 

Artiola abcA WO mUi.SW& %O b. 4OpO8ikb With the St8k Tr888- 

were 
.: 

liD O&O. 8ktOd, it 18 OW O#liOn th8t pFOCeid8 of 

iMtiFMU PO&&Ok@ M. OMh krila8 b8lw t0 th0 AViilabl8 

be u~pend~4 for th8 9urpo808 

OUtlOW.” 
. 

Dre C. D. 8lnmon#, me #7 

w tu lloud of R4grab8 Wktir into Uz ot;MUnant rith 

sea4 and smith hund8tion whereby th. fouAdatia uill 8OhOt 

S. 

the oontrutor for the eon8truotlon 8ra repass work to be 

dono, m&m tbo oonbnot without adverti8im& for bid+ 8ad rim-eby tim lbnd8tloa mLll pay th4 oontx8otor Sor tha making or 

8Uahn&8 8nd ~OV8lWnt8,butWith ~UXbdOP8tudi~ that 

tb8 BO8I'd -1 ZWlburW th0 k'OUIld8t%OXl iOr 008t.8 80 hClX'M&, 

tc the extent that the preeeede 0r the inwruwe peliofe8 will 

do 8Ot Ih OUT O#&O& tkr w not, l'@&W%lO88 Ot th. fWt 

that the prooadumi8 OUggOat&u the aoaM uhoreby th8 Pound&tiOllW~~~ tLu OMt Of th@ -j&F8 U&d fOQMtW.tSt8 mhloh 

i8bOSW8OOf t& u0Wt8 eWolV04 under th0 lnwmnee contMokeWd.dbythe 8kt4 u&ma the durged bui161li&8. AlthOU@thO 8~@~~~O~iOW17OOQCl~p~te8 th8t 

mo~tofthofundr8Uohaeoteboe l d W8 pPiV8te iUtld8 

vhloh are propow to he umd toe 

amwent t&t the propoul aentap F 

0 bener1t, yet it 18 

to8 al00 the expendlturr f 

orpubliofund8lntheew8frwtlouorlDp POtYILt8UdthO 

of repdr8 to the Wlldlag8 kt the H&dioal Sohool. The 

tW0 br8 dO&&Od t0 thD Borrd Of R@gOLit8 Of th. IhiVOMit7 tho WUU to m&& fb eOxAtnOt8 on b&a&f of ttrs Stat. 

-rOr tb* OOM~MO~W~D~OMO~~MO~ 8whbuiiOiay, 8XKit.W 

tEt3Ygzin od 

UprWU8atr thwetoi but by the eeae 

tb w, In8 llmlted th* ueM.r 00 %.tr 8Xwelu. (Art.10 Ye mm, above quota). To pumlt the expenditureorpublierunA8iorwehP\LfOOHo , the oontnctr tkroretor 
. ., 

Dr. C. D. S-a pa&W #6 

PQud that m a&w’tlomm!& to8 bid8 &all k mad., but that 

tim oodraot dlul be lot without maoh folulity. 

aupbloalmthathewaoohooenbeulue&u 

de Sit utd l -W to uwalmo t&t J-0 

mm& ud dlauwtsan, 

tub. anoth*l, in hi8 

a, mod8 pomw to mbot1- 

bukurglvaatehlm, 

ho oannot dolqato 
. . .,
Supplemental Retirement Plan for Charles Schultz



Exhibit 10.30 
 
BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE CORPORATION 
 
AMENDMENT OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE 
SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN FOR CHARLES L. SCHULTZ 
 
Recommend adoption of the following resolution by the Board of Directors: 
 
AMENDMENT OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE 
SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN FOR CHARLES L. SCHULTZ 
 
WHEREAS, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Retirement Plan
(the “Plan”) and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Supplemental Retirement Plan (the “Supplemental Plan”) to provide pension benefits to the salaried employees of the Company and certain of its affiliated companies; 
 
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.1 of the Supplemental Plan, the
Company provides certain supplemental pension benefits as set forth on Schedule A to the Supplemental Plan; 
 
WHEREAS, the Company wishes to provide Mr. Charles L. Schultz, Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer, with certain pension
benefits as described in the attached Exhibit D to the Minutes of the Compensation and Development Committee dated December 11, 2002, by amending the Supplemental Plan to provide for such benefits; 
 
NOW THEREFORE IT IS RESOLVED, that Mr. Charles L. Schultz be
provided with supplemental pension benefits calculated in the manner described in Exhibit D to the Minutes of the Compensation and Development Committee dated December 11, 2002; 
 
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Vice President-Human Resources is authorized and directed to prepare a Retirement
Benefit Agreement for Mr. Schultz on substantially the terms and conditions indicated in Exhibit D to the Minutes of the Compensation and Development Committee dated December 11, 2002; 
 
FURTHER RESOLVED that the Supplemental Plan be amended by adding “Retirement Benefit Agreement between
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation and Mr. Charles L. Schultz” at the end of Schedule A; 
 
FURTHER RESOLVED, that each of the Secretary and other officers of the Company are authorized and empowered by and on behalf and in the
name of the Company to do and perform, or cause to be done and performed, all such acts, deeds and things and to make, execute and deliver, or cause to be made, executed and delivered, all such agreements, undertakings, documents, instruments or
certificates, as each such officer may deem necessary or appropriate to effectuate or carry out fully the purpose and intent of the foregoing resolutions. 
 
 
Fort Worth, Texas 
December 12, 2002
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT ALBORRAN, JR., :

:

Petitioner :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-15-877

:

TREVOR WINGARD, : (Judge Brann)

:

Respondent :

ORDER

January 21, 2016

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1. Respondent’s request (Doc. 13) for dismissal of the

petition as being untimely is GRANTED.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

3. Based on the Court’s conclusion herein, there is no basis

for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

1

Case 4:15-cv-00877-MWB-JVW Document 17 Filed 01/21/16 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-2000
<CASH>                                           7,782
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                       888
<INVENTORY>                                        571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,604
<PP&E>                                          49,463
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,471
<BONDS>                                         13,897
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           226
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,312
<SALES>                                         68,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,784
<CGS>                                           61,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,608
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (484)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,441)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       320
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,761)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,258)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27064]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984.
    Interested parties can review or obtain copies of agreements at the 
Washington, DC offices of the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, 
N.W., Room 962. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement 
to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, 
within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.

Agreement No.: 224-201034
Title: Broward County/Discovery Cruise Terminal Agreement
Parties:
    Broward County, Florida (Port Everglades)
    Discovery Cruise Services, Inc. (Discovery)
Synopsis: The proposed Agreement authorizes Broward County to provide 
berthing and related terminal facilities, and passenger wharfage at a 
reduced rate, to Discovery in exchange for its agreement to provide 
daily passenger cruise service from Port Everglades.

Agreement No.: 224-201035
Title: Port of Galveston/Del Monte Fresh Produce N.S., Inc.
Parties:
    Board of Trustees of the Galveston Wharves
    Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc.
Synopsis: The proposed Agreement permits the Port of Galveston to lease 
to Del Monte property located at Pier 18 for the purpose of handling 
fresh fruit and other produce, and all general cargo transported by Del 
Monte's chartered, owned or affreighted vessels. The term of the 
Agreement is for five years.

    Dated: October 7, 1997.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27064 Filed 10-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
September 2, 2016 

Mr. Stephen Gowdy 

Gowdy Brothers Aerospace, LLC 

Consultant for THETA UAV Solutions, Inc. 

8170 Old Carriage Court North 

Shakopee, MN 55379 

Re: FAA-2016-3367 

Dear Mr. Gowdy: 

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already. 

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF REGAL CINEMAS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          40,604
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,050
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,242
<PP&E>                                       1,642,158
<DEPRECIATION>                                 185,409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,080,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          164,390
<BONDS>                                      1,773,138
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       199,778
<OTHER-SE>                                     (85,618)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,080,209
<SALES>                                        285,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,037,071
<CGS>                                           44,276
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  429,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               610,305
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             132,162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (133,907)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    45,357
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (88,550)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (88,550)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Joel T. HENRY, Natalie F. Henry, his wife, Joel T. Henry Aircraft Corporation; and Winder Aircraft Corporation of Florida, Appellants, v. MARION COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-465.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Dec. 18, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 14, 1970.

S. Perry Penland, Jacksonville, and Howard B. Pearl, Citra, for appellants.

Willard Ayres, Ocala, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing from the records and briefs before us that the County was acting within its legal authority, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52692-52693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26832]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Commission of Fine Arts; Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for 16 
October 1997 at 10:00 am in the Commission's offices at the Pension 
Building, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 441 F Street, N.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20001. The meeting will focus on a variety of projects affecting 
the appearance of the city.
    Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written or 
oral statements should be addressed to

[[Page 52693]]

Charles H. Atherton, Secretary, Commission of Fine Arts, at the above 
address or call 202-504-2000. Individuals requiring sign language 
interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at 
least 10 days before the meeting date.

    Dated in Washington, DC, 1 October 1997.
Charles H. Atherton,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26832 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
### Geology and water resources of Big Smoky, Clayton, and Alkali Spring Valleys, Nevada

By: Oscar Edward Meinzer

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp423

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Pages:                               - **Alkali Spring Valley**                            (html)
  - **Big Smoky Valley**                            (html)
  - **Clayton Valley**                            (html) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.