alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## **EXHIBIT 31.2**

# **INSWEB CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, William D. Griffin, Chief Financial Officer ofInsWeb Corporation, certify that:

(1)           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of InsWebCorporation;

(2)           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)           The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), for the registrant and we have:

a.    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 (5)          The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors:

a.    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
|                         | **/s/ WILLIAM D. GRIFFIN** | ** ** |
|-------------------------|----------------------------|------------|
| Dated: November 9, 2006 | **William D. Griffin**     |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer    |

 

----
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF SHILOH INDUSTRIES, INC.


         The following is a list of the subsidiaries of Shiloh Industries, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"). The common stock of all the
corporations listed below is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by the
Corporation. If indented, the corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of the
corporation under which it is listed unless otherwise noted.


NAME OF CORPORATION                                     STATE OF INCORPORATION

Shiloh Corporation                                               Ohio
         The Sectional Die Company                               Ohio
                  Sectional Stamping, Inc.                       Ohio
Valley City Steel Company1                                       Ohio
         Medina Blanking, Inc.2                                  Ohio
         Liverpool Coil Processing, Incorporated                 Ohio
Greenfield Die & Manufacturing Corporation                       Ohio
C&H Design Company                                               Michigan
Jefferson Blanking, Inc.                                         Georgia


The Corporation also owns an 80% equity interest in Shiloh of Michigan, L.L.C.,
a Michigan limited liability company. The Corporation owns a 19.75% equity
interest in Bing Banking L.L.C., a Michigan limited liability company.

--------

1        Valley City Steel Company is 49% owned by the Corporation and 51% owned
         by Shiloh Corporation.

2        Medina Blanking, Inc. is 22% owned by the Corporation, 22% owned by
         Shiloh Corporation and 56% owned by Valley City Steel Company.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2997 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2997

 To amend title 40, United States Code, to increase the mileage of the 
 Appalachian Development Highway System to provide for improvements to 
 and expansion of Corridor K in North Carolina, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 29 (legislative day, September 22), 2023

  Mr. Tillis introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 40, United States Code, to increase the mileage of the 
 Appalachian Development Highway System to provide for improvements to 
 and expansion of Corridor K in North Carolina, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPALACHIAN DEVELOPMENT HIGHWAY SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--Section 14501(a) of title 40, United States Code, 
is amended, in the second sentence, by striking ``three thousand and 
ninety miles'' and inserting ``3,105 miles''.
    (b) Purpose.--The increase in mileage to the Appalachian 
Development Highway System made by the amendment made by subsection (a) 
shall be for improvements to and expansion of Corridor K in North 
Carolina.
                                 <all>
```
Case 4:06-cv-01522-JEJ Document 18 Filed 12/13/06 Page 1 of 4
Case 4:06-cv-01522-JEJ Document 18 Filed 12/13/06 Page 2 of 4
Case 4:06-cv-01522-JEJ Document 18 Filed 12/13/06 Page 3 of 4
Case 4:06-cv-01522-JEJ Document 18 Filed 12/13/06 Page 4 of 4
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


                  We the undersigned directors of Sodexho Marriott Services,
Inc. (the "Corporation"), do hereby constitute and appoint Robert A. Stern and
Joan Rector McGlockton, or either or both of them, with full power of
substitution, our true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, to do any and
all acts and things in our names and our behalf in our capacities as directors
for the purpose of executing and filing on behalf of the Corporation, a
Transition Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 28, 1998,
including any exhibits thereto and any and all amendments thereto; and we hereby
ratify and confirm all that said attorneys and agents shall do or cause to be
one by virtue thereof.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed and
delivered this Power of Attorney on and as of October 15, 1998.




<TABLE>

<S>                                                      <C>

/s/ WILLIAM J. SHAW                                      /s/ PIERRE BELLON
------------------------------------------------         -----------------------------------------------
William J. Shaw, Director                                Pierre Bellon, Director

/s/ BERNARD CARTON
------------------------------------------------         -----------------------------------------------
Bernard Carton, Director                                 Edouard de Royere

/s/ JOHN W. MARRIOTT, III                                /s/ DOCTOR R. CRANTS
------------------------------------------------         -----------------------------------------------
John W. Marriott, III, Director                          Doctor R. Crants, Director

/s/ DANIEL J. ALTOBELLO                                  /s/ CHARLES D. O'DELL
------------------------------------------------         -----------------------------------------------
Daniel J. Altobello, Director                            Charles D. O'Dell, Director

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THOMAS ALLISON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 04-151 Erie

)

COUNTY OF VENANGO, et al., ) 

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on June 1, 2004, and

was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and

recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules

72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, filed on June 7, 2005, [Doc. No. 18]

recommended that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 14] be granted. The parties were

allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff

by certified mail and on Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the case,

together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2005,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 14] is

GRANTED. 

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated June 7, 2005, is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

The clerk is directed to mark the case closed.

s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: All parties of record. 

Case 1:04-cv-00151-SJM-SPB Document 19 Filed 07/29/05 Page 1 of 1
#### Floyd Herman RANDALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-409.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 5, 1970.

Rehearing Denied September 23, 1970.

Henry Gonzalez, Tampa, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William D. Roth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

HOBSON, Chief Judge.

Appellant appeals a judgment and sentence imposed upon him for the crime of concealing stolen property. The property in question was certain ivory, jade and amethyst carvings which the evidence showed were stolen from Sheldon Klein on the night of January 28, 1967. These articles were found in the home of the appellant pursuant to a search made under the authority of a search warrant.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the evidence, the trial court’s denial of his motion for mistrial, and the trial court’s admission into evidence of the commission of a separate criminal offense.

We affirm the trial court’s rulings on the two motions; however, we hold that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence *82the commission of a separate criminál offense, under Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654.

The facts which established the separate offense may be summarized as follows:

Mr. Brimmage, the owner of a small grocery store testified that his store had been entered sometime during the night of April 11, 1967 and that certain money order blanks, together with a money order machine used to make out the money orders, were missing on the morning of April 12, 1967. Detective Blitch testified that on April 26, 1967 he arrested1 the appellant as he disembarked from his truck. After the arrest he testified that he sat behind the wheel of the truck, pulled down the sun visor, and some money orders fell out. These money orders turned out to be some of the ones stolen from Mr. Brimmage’s store. This is the entire testimony as to the separate criminal offense.

The Williams case, supra, lays down the rule that if the separate offense is relevant and has probative value in proof of any issue in the case on trial, such evidence is admissible. However, if the evidence of the commission of another crime has as its sole relevancy the bad character or propensity of the accused to commit a crime, it is reversible error for such evidence to be admitted and considered by the jury.

Upon a careful reading of the entire transcript of the trial of this cause we can find no relevancy of the separate offense to the issues involved in the case being tried. The sole relevancy of the separate offense being the bad character of the appellant or his propensity to commit a crime, the judgment and sentence must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

PIERCE and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

1

. The record is completely devoid of the charge upon which Blitch arrested the appellant. It does appear from the record that the arrest was not for any crime connected with the money orders, the money order machine, or with the stolen property involved in the case sub judice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,964
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,964
<PP&E>                                         178,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (38,154)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,810
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,140
<BONDS>                                        160,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,990
<OTHER-SE>                                    (59,520)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,810
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,440
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,340
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (33,148)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (33,148)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,148)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.011)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.011)


</TABLE>
'-a

s^mmea/^

XS^l ^^*^~*~*?**

s

APR 15 2015
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3181 

To designate the Air and Marine Operations Marine Unit of the U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection located at 101 Km 18.5 in Cabo Rojo, Puerto 

Rico, as the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Marine Unit’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2023 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, and Mr. PADILLA) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the Air and Marine Operations Marine Unit 

of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection located at 

101 Km 18.5 in Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Michel 

O. Maceda Marine Unit’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Me5 morial Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress makes the following findings: 

2 

•S 3181 IS

1 (1) Marine Interdiction Agent Michel O. 

2 Maceda served honorably in the United States Army 

3 as a wheeled vehicle mechanic prior to joining the 

4 United States Border Patrol as an Agent in Doug5 las, Arizona, in April 2016. 

6 (2) In 2021, Agent Maceda became a Marine 

7 Interdiction Agent with U.S. Customs and Border 

8 Protection, Air and Marine Operations in Mayagu ̈ez, 

9 Puerto Rico. 

10 (3) On November 17, 2022, Agent Maceda and 

11 2 other agents were conducting a drug interdiction 

12 stop off the coast of Puerto Rico, during which the 

13 agents boarded the target vessel. 

14 (4) During the stop, Agent Maceda was mor15 tally wounded when 1 of the occupants of the vessel 

16 shot the boarding agents with a firearm. 

17 (5) Agent Maceda is survived by his daughter, 

18 brother, and parents. 

19 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION. 

20 The Air and Marine Operations Marine Unit of the 

21 U.S. Customs and Border Protection located at 101 Km 

22 18.5 in Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico, shall forever be known 

23 and designated as the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Marine Unit’’. 

3 

•S 3181 IS

1 SEC. 4. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the marine 

4 unit referred to in section 3 shall be deemed to be a ref5 erence to the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Marine Unit’’. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5                                                
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,831
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,787
<INVENTORY>                                     48,741
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,050
<PP&E>                                          22,867
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,010
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,175
<SALES>                                        366,657
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               366,657
<CGS>                                          301,428
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  301,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   865
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,702
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,788
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,914
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,914
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alexis Korybut, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Alexis Korybut Alexis Korybut Chief Financial Officer August 20, 2012
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------



    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Timothy  R.  Kasmoch, as the Chief Executive Officer of N-Viro International
Corporation, certify that (i) the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information  contained  in  the  Form  10-K  fairly  presents,  in  all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  N-Viro
International  Corporation.


/s/Timothy  R.  Kasmoch
-----------------------
Timothy  R.  Kasmoch,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer
March  31,  2010
<PAGE>   1





                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-62787)
and Form S-4 (333-03107) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.
33-57083, 33-57077, 33-57081, 33-64553, 333-10389 and 333-17891) of AirTouch
Communications, Inc. of our report dated February 25, 1997 appearing on page
27 of the Annual Report to Stockholders which is incorporated by reference
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule listed in Item
14(a) of this Form 10-K, which appears on page X-1 of this Form 10-K.



/s/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

San Francisco, California
March 20, 1997