alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.1**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I, Miguel Galuccio,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of YPF S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this reportany change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:March 30, 2015.
Exhibit
      23.1










Consent
      of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting
      Firm








We
      have
      issued our reports dated December 7, 2007, accompanying the consolidated
      financial statements and included in the Annual Report of Key Technology, Inc.
      on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007.  We
      hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
      Registration Statements of Key Technology, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-71108,
      333-50130, 333-128512, and 333-2396).





/s/
      GRANT
      THORNTON LLP





Seattle,
      Washington


December
      7, 2007
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 24.1
                                                                    ------------

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                  KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned
directors and officers of Shiloh Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
hereby constitutes and appoints John F. Falcon, Craig A. Stacy and Thomas C.
Daniels, and each of them, as the true and lawful attorney or attorneys-in-fact,
with full power of substitution and revocation, for each of the undersigned and
in the name, place and stead of each of the undersigned, to sign on behalf of
each of the undersigned an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 2000 pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and to sign any and all amendments to such Annual Report, and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,
including, without limitation, a Form 12b-25, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting to said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, and each of them,
full power and authority to do so and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorney or attorneys-in-fact or any of
them or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

                  This Power of Attorney may be executed in multiple
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original with respect to the
person executing it.

                  Executed as of this 10th day of January 2001.

/s/ James C. Fanello                       /s/ David J. Hessler
----------------------------------         -------------------------------------
James C. Fanello                           David J. Hessler
Director                                   Director

/s/ Curtis E. Moll                         /s/ James A. Karman
----------------------------------         -------------------------------------
Curtis E. Moll                             James A. Karman
Chairman of the Board and Director         Director

/s/ Theodore K. Zampetis                   /s/ Ronald C. Houser
----------------------------------         -------------------------------------
Theodore K. Zampetis                       Ronald C. Houser
Director                                   Director

/s/ Maynard H. Murch, IV                   /s/ John F. Falcon
----------------------------------         -------------------------------------
Maynard H. Murch, IV                       John F. Falcon
Director                                   President, Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer) and
                                            Director

/s/ Craig A. Stacy
----------------------------------
Craig A. Stacy
Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1319
JERRY L. GENT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAT L. SMITH, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (MISC-97-1-A) Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997 Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry L. Gent, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting leave toproceed in forma pauperis yet imposing a partial filing fee. Appellant also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and recusal of the district court judge. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion imposing the partial filing feeand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gent v. Smith , No. MISC-97-1-A (W.D. Va. Feb. 24, 1997). Additionally, we grant Appellant leave to proceedin forma pauperis on appeal. Further, Gent has not shown extrajudicial, personal bias; therefore, we deny his motion requesting judicial recusal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2    Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, James K. McHugh, as the Chief Financial Officer of N-Viro International Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Form 10-K) (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of N-Viro International Corporation.   /s/  James K. McHugh James K. McHugh, Chief Financial Officer April 16, 2013
### HEPARTMEN TO F ::ii.NSPORmr!O N ;.:JU: T

### OPERATION S SERVE D NOVEMBE R2 , 201 0 •-iGNOV- 3 A ^ : 3 0 U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
I NTH EMATTERO F FEDERA LEXPRES S CORPORATIO N FA A DOCKE T NO
. CPlONMOO l 1 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S NO
. FAA-2010-097 7
NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No
. 2008NM700127 ) ha s bee nassigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC
. Goodwin
. Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do nth e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o nth e attache dServic e List
.

Ronni e A
. Yod^ f Chie f Administrativ e RaW^udg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CPlONMOOl 1 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Cynthi aChandler-Snell , Respondent' s Counse l Senio r Attorney , Federa l Express , Inc
. 362 0 Hack s Cros s Roa d Buildin g B , 3' " Floo r Memphis , T N 38125-880 0 TEL : 901-434-836 1 FAX : 901-434-828 3 Scot t R
. Morris , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Northwes t

Mountai n Region , ANM-7 , FA A 160 1 Lin dAvenue , S.W
. Renton , W

A 9805 7 TEL : 425-227-141 7 FAX : 425-227-100 7 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r

202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso no r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Hearin g Docket , Federa l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 tadependence Avenue, S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigli t Buildin g - Roo m 2014, Washington

, D C 20591 , Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Ricardo Nevarez OCAMPO, Appellant, v. E. Wilson PURDY, Sheriff, Dade County, Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1058.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 25, 1971.

Pearson & Josefsberg, Miami, for appellant.

Richard E. Gerstein, State Atty., and Richard J. Registro, Asst. State Atty., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rules stated in Chase v. State, 93 Fla. 963, 113 So, 103 (1927).
Exhibit 21.1

List of Subsidiaries, as of December 1, 2006

Key Technology, Inc., an Oregon corporation (the Registrant)



| |  |  | Key Technology Holdings USA LLC, an Oregon limited liability company
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Suplusco Holding B.V., a Netherlands corporation
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Key Technology B.V., a Netherlands corporation
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Key Technology AMVC LLC, an Oregon limited liability company
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Key Technology Australia Pty Ltd.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------



| |  | Freshline Machines Pty Ltd.
| | - | ---------------------------



| |  |  | Productos Key Mexicana S. de R.L. de C.V.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------



| |  |  | Key Technology (Shanghai) Trading Co. Ltd.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------
#### Richard Lee DOWDY, Appellant, v. Sarah Ann JOHNSON, a/k/a Sarah Ann Dowdy, Appellee.

No. 70-663.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 11, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Hugh MacMillan, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26693]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Notice of Transfer of Lands--Colorado River Storage Project, 
Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

SUMMARY: By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the 
Interior by Section 8 of the Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP) Act 
of April 11, 1956 (70 Stat. 110), and his delegation of authority to 
the Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), 
jurisdiction over the following described land, which lies within the 
exterior boundary of the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) Montrose 
Resource Area, Colorado, and which was acquired by Reclamation for fish 
and wildlife mitigation purposes for the development of the Wayne P. 
Aspinall Unit, a unit of the CRSP, is hereby transferred to BLM for 
fish and wildlife purposes.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the Memorandum of agreement between Reclamation 
and BLM are on file in the Office of the Regional Director, Upper 
Colorado Region, Bureau of Reclamation, 125 South State Street, Salt 
Lake City, Utah; and the State Director, Colorado State Office, Bureau 
of Land Management, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Darrell Welch, Bureau of 
Reclamation, Upper Colorado Region, 125 South State Street, Salt Lake 
City, Utah 84138 or telephone (801) 524-3765.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the National Intragency 
Agreement between Reclamation and BLM dated March 25, 1983, agreements 
may be executed between both agencies for recreation, and fish and 
wildlife management activities on Federal land. Statutory authority for 
such agreements includes: Section 307, Federal Land Policy and 
Management Act (43 U.S.C. 1937); Economy Act (31 U.S.C. 686); and 
Reclamation Act of 1902 (43 U.S.C. Chapter 12) as amended or 
supplemented thereto.
    Parcel No. WAU-(mit.)-1 describes the 225 acres of Reclamation 
acquired land to be transferred to BLM. The parcel consists of that 
portion of the McCluskey property as referenced by Memorandum of 
Agreement, Contract No. 0-LM-40-00340, dated July 30, 1992, between 
Reclamation and BLM.
    Pursuant to Section 8 of the CRSP, the above land shall become BLM 
land with the provision that the land is administered and managed for 
angler access and other fish and wildlife purposes.

    Dated: October 2, 1997.
Eluid L. Martinez,
Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. 97-26693 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-94-M
## Gormas, Michael (OST) Gormas, Michael (OST) Tuesday, June 03, 2014 11:44 AM Dennis Plautz (dennis@greaterfortdodge.com); Eric Bookmeyer; posgood@netconx.net; 

### j'.,. j i: (I

### f

ort Dodge, Airport Manager, RhondaChambers; Fort Dodge, City Manager, David

, , '~"-Fierke; Fort Dodge, Mayor, Matt Bemrich shane@airchoiceone.com; Mike Matthews; chowell@flygreatlakes
.com; dvoss@flygreatlakes.com; Darnea Wood; Cindy Stork; Devany, Dennis (OST); Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) Essential Air Service at Fort Dodge and Mason City Air Choice One Proposal at Fort Dodge Mason City Iowa Docket DOT-OST-2001-10682 DOT-OST-2001-10684 (Final).pdf; Great Lakes proposal FOD-MCW-MSP Bid 2014 as of 06-02-14 FinaLpdf From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject: Attachments:

Hello everyone, I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS)situation at Fort Dodge and Mason City, lA, aswell asgive you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. We issued Order 2014-4-22 (April 22, 2014), re-requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing EASfor a new term. In response to our request, two air carriers submitted proposals: Air Choice One and Great LakesAviation
. I have attached each air carrier's proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometime today
. I request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but no later than Wednesday, July 2, 2014. Please send your comments directly via e-mail to michaeLgormas@dot
.gov. Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that I have not included on the distribution list. Please direct all questions regarding these proposals to Michael Gormas at michaeLgormas@dot.gov. Michael D. Gormas United States Department of Transportation Office of Aviation Analysis 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC20590 202.366.1853

1
Order entered July 26, 2017

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 00445

- CV

GEORGE MORRIS, Appellant

V.

SOUTHERN JOURNEYS OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Count y Court at Law No. 7

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 007

- 02709

- 2016



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s July 24, 2017 motion for an extension of time to file a

brief. We GRANT the motion. We ORDER the brief tendered to this Court by appell ant on

July 24, 2017 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 12a0082p.06 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 07-2469 M ICHIGAN B ELL T ELEPHONE C OMPANY , Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. C OVAD C OMMUNICATIONS C OMPANY ; T ALK A MERICA , I NC .; XO C OMMUNICATIONS S ERVICES , I NC ., Intervenors Defendants-Appellants,

M C L EOD USA T ELECOMMUNICATIONS S ERVICES , I NC .; TDS M ETROCOM , LLC, Intervenors, J. P ETER L ARK , Commissioner; L AURA C HAPPELLE ; M ONICA M ARTINEZ , Defendants

. No. 07-2473 M ICHIGAN B ELL T ELEPHONE C OMPANY , Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. L AURA C HAPPELLE ; J. P ETER L ARK ; M ONICA M ARTINEZ , Defendants-Appellants , C OVAD C OMMUNICATIONS C OMPANY ; T ALK A MERICA , I NC .; M C L EOD USA T ELECOMMUNICATIONS S ERVICES , I NC .; TDS M ETROCOM , LLC; XO C OMMUNICATIONS S ERVICES , I NC ., Intervenors. X - - - - > , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N Nos. 07-2469/2473

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. No. 06-11982—Julian A. Cook, Jr., District Judge. Argued: December 10, 2008 Decided and Filed: March 26, 2012 Before: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; GILMAN and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.

1Nos. 07-2469/2473 Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Lark, et al. Page 2

_________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: Bill Magness, CASEY, GENTZ & MAGNESS, L.L.P., Austin, Texas, Michael A. Nickerson, OFFICE OF THE MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellants. William Julius Champion III, DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Appellee. Scott H. Angstreich, KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae. ON BRIEF: Bill Magness, CASEY, GEN TZ & MAGNESS, L.L.P., Austin, Texas, Michael A. Nickerson, OFFICE OF THE MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, Lansing, Michigan, Michael S. Asht on, FRASER, TREBILCOCK, DAVIS & DUNLAP, P.C., Lansing, Michigan, Steven D. Hughey, OFFICE OF THE MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL, Lansing, Michigan, for Appellants. William Julius Champion III, Jeffery V. Stuckey, DICKINSON WR IGHT PLLC, Ann Arbor, Michigan, for Appellee. Scott H. Angstreich, KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, EVANS & FIGEL, PLLC, Washington, D.C., Laurel R. Bergold, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae.

_________________ OPINION

_________________ ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge. On appeal of this case to the United States Supreme Court, the Court reversed our prior holding and held that the incumbent local exchange carrier, Michigan Bell, must lease its existing entrance facilities for interconnection at cost-based rates. Talk Am., Inc. v. Mich. Bell Tel. Co. , 564 U.S. --, 131 S. Ct. 2254, 2260 (2011).
Consequently, we REVERSE the district court’s judgment to the contrary and REMAND this case to the district court with instructions to enter an Order consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 


FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 


JAMES H. ROGERS, ) 


Plaintiff ) 

) 

vs. ) Civil Action No. IO-13IE 

) Chief U.S. District Judge Gary L. Lancaster/ 

) ChiefU.S. Magistrate Judge Amy Reynolds Hay 

SCI PGH WESTERN PENITENTIARY, ) 

Northside ofPghlMHU Unit; C.O. ) 

SMITTY, MHU Correctional Officer; C.O. ) 

TERRI, MHU Correctional Officer; C.O. ) 

RJ, MHU Correctional Officer; MHU TECH) 

ANDRE; MENTAL HEALTH TECH JB; ) 

MHU TECH TRACI; MHU TECH TROY; ) 

NURSE BILL; NURSE JOE, ) 

Defendants ) 

ORDER 

AND NOW, this 25th day of August, 2010, after the Plaintiff, James H. Rogers, 

filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by 

the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties until August 9,2010, to file written 

objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the 

record, and upon consideration ofthe Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is 

adopted as the opinion of this Court, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is dismissed for failure to prosecute. 

Case 1:10-cv-00131-GLL-ARH Document 4 Filed 08/25/10 Page 1 of 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(I) ofthe Federal Rules 

of Appellate Procedure, if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order, he must do so within 

thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P .. 

ChiefUnited States District Judge 

cc: 	 Honorable Amy Reynolds Hay 

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

James H. Rogers 


FE-9381 


SCI Albion 


10745 Rt 18 


Albion, PA 16475 


All Counsel of Record by electronic filing 

Case 1:10-cv-00131-GLL-ARH Document 4 Filed 08/25/10 Page 2 of 2