alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3195 

AN ACT 

To designate the General George C. Marshall House, in 

the Commonwealth of Virginia, as an affiliated area of 

the National Park System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3195 ES

1 SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE GENERAL GEORGE C. 

2 MARSHALL HOUSE AS AN AFFILIATED AREA. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The General George C. Marshall 

4 House in the Commonwealth of Virginia is established as 

5 an affiliated area of the National Park System (referred 

6 to in this section as the ‘‘affiliated area’’) to promote pub7 lic appreciation of the significant historic contributions 

8 made by United States military leader and statesman 

9 George Catlett Marshall, Jr. 

10 (b) DESCRIPTION OF AFFILIATED AREA.—The affili11 ated area shall consist of the area generally depicted as 

12 the ‘‘General George C. Marshall House Property, Lees13 burg, Virginia’’ on the map entitled ‘‘General George C. 

14 Marshall House, Proposed Affiliated Area’’, numbered 

15 999/189,974, and dated September 2023. 

16 (c) ADMINISTRATION.—The affiliated area shall be 

17 managed in a manner consistent with— 

18 (1) this section; and 

19 (2) any law generally applicable to units of the 

20 National Park System. 

21 (d) MANAGEMENT ENTITY.—The George C. Marshall 

22 International Center shall be the management entity for 

23 the affiliated area. 

24 (e) AGREEMENTS.—The Secretary of the Interior (re25 ferred to in this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’)— 
3 

†S 3195 ES

1 (1) may provide technical assistance and enter 

2 into cooperative agreements with the management 

3 entity designated by subsection (d) for the purpose 

4 of providing financial assistance for the marketing, 

5 marking, interpretation, and preservation of the af6 filiated area; and 

7 (2) shall enter into an agreement with the man8 agement entity designated by subsection (d) that de9 scribes the roles and responsibilities for the manage10 ment of the affiliated area consistent with the poli11 cies and standards that apply to units of the Na12 tional Park System. 

13 (f) LIMITED ROLE OF THE SECRETARY.—Nothing in 

14 this section authorizes the Secretary— 

15 (1) to acquire property at the affiliated area; or 

16 (2) to assume overall financial responsibility for 

17 the operation, maintenance, or management of the 

18 affiliated area. 

Passed the Senate December 20 (legislative day, December 16), 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3195 

AN ACT 

To designate the General George C. Marshall 

for other purposes. affiliated area of the National Park System, and House, in the Commonwealth of Virginia, as an
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00153

- CV

In the Interest of F.M.B. and P.W.B.,

Children §

§

§

§ From the 322nd District Court

o f Tarrant County (322

- 376634

- 04 )

January 9, 2014

P er C uriam



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordere d that Appellant D.J.B. shall pay all costs of this appeal,

for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6765
JACK RAY VIGUE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN B. TAYLOR; H. PONTON, Assis tant Warden, Operations; MICHAEL A. SHUPE; ANITA KELLY; CORPORAL ZUMBRO; MR. CLARK; LARRY D. HUFFMAN; E. C. MORRIS; JAMES E. BRIGGS, Defendants - Appellees, and
BOBBY W. SOLES; MAJOR JONES; CAPTAIN BARKSDALE; LIEUTENANT COTRELL; MR. BROWN; LIEUTENANT ROBERT WILSON; SERGEANT SMITH, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Vir ginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-84-R) Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2Jack Ray Vigue, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order de nying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of thedistrict court. With respect to Appellant's claims of denial of access to the courts, we note that Appellant failed to show prejudice to his litigation sufficient to survive summary judgment. Strickler v. Waters , 989 F.2d 1375, 1383, (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 949 (1993); White v. White , 886 F.2d 721 (4th Cir. 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50803 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW LAMPRECHT,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-95-CR-10-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

August 14, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Christopher Matthew Lamprecht, # 61153-080, appeals the

district court’s denial of his motion to proceed in forma

pauperis filed in connection with his motion for transcripts of

his sentencing hearings at Government expense. Assuming arguendo

that the court has jurisdiction of this appeal, see United States

v. Miramontez, 995 F.2d 56, 58 (5th Cir. 1993), despite the lack

of a pending 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion with which these motions

should have been filed, we hold that the appeal is moot. 
No. 96-50803

-2-

Lamprecht received the relief he requested when the district

court granted permission to appeal in forma pauperis and ordered

the transcripts prepared, as Lamprecht recognized in his reply

brief. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-5970 |
|------------------------------------|----------|

 

Cash Account Trust

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 04/30 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 04/30/09 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

----
I

### \)~.**'N{.J~** 

### J**~' td?I-\J(iV~**  l('**~hu: PO\~C..ae-~**  .t Vvl\ c.tJ'f.

t l sUI).SlQV. : tl

- 5005**~e_d** 

### P

J- W**0Jvv..M~f** ()1/'**~** l \e...w-.**~\MJ'{J ~\vY\..**  \?vr-b

· c.-\1\tov! 

# J

M

### tk~ ,--e.(p__rc.J 

### -to WTC

.

### fJ1~-,r,.._L4" }Prov \ ' k

### ~ 

### YC!&



# , N tJ\

# ~**-__.:;.~____,r ~~** 

- - - - ) ; MNbt**~ 11t-iw~IJ-f**  L- 

## CO;hv 

## e+-W 

## /r'Jo'--/

-- s-3 4 

## -etfo 1

## ~-s~UJ-4/1;~**+fvll,dj&fvd~c_** Q o;;

## ~ %9-d**La.~ ~~-N-Y**  

# '8>4 

# W 33o

-

### B~D fo'02S

'

1 (I !:J s.e. 

### S t .e 1 

### n «**B~** c? t' 

## a 3 ' f3 

### 4 \ '\- \**k_~...,** \"**C~\\'3"-'"' ~Pp** 

## S~M 

# (Jtd zf.ll

t c:.JLtL-**.) t•** **lt** U / t:: YA### r,,l\~**~\v'\.S** 

### EX>



### A

t 

# ?Jrv Tstv**~o** \-\)**~:: ·**  

# r**~**
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor
Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Monte Zweben, the Chief Executive Officer of Blue Martini Software, Inc. (the Company), and Eran Pilovsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that,
to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, to the which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 4, 2003



/s/    MONTE ZWEBENMonte ZwebenChief Executive Officer/s/    ERAN PILOVSKYEran PilovskyChief Financial Officer




This
certification accompanies the Periodic Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after that date of the Periodic Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

| Subsidiary                                                      |   | OrganizedUnder the Laws of |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                                            |   |                                      |
| Cedara Software Corp.                                           |   | Ontario, Canada                           |
| Cedara Software (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.                             |   | China                                     |
| Cedara Software (USA) Ltd.                                      |   | Delaware                                  |
| Confirma Europe GmbH                                            |   | Germany                                   |
| Confirma Europe LLC                                             |   | Washington                                |
| etrials, Inc.                                                   |   | Delaware                                  |
| etrials Worldwide Limited                                       |   | United Kingdom                            |
| Medical Imaging Education LLC                                   |   | Washington                                |
| Merge Asset Management Corp.                                    |   | Delaware                                  |
| Merge CAD Inc.                                                  |   | Delaware                                  |
| Merge Cedara ExchangeCo Limited                                 |   | Ontario, Canada                           |
| Merge eClinical Inc.                                            |   | Delaware                                  |
| Merge eMed, Inc.                                           |   | Delaware                                  |
| Merge Healthcare Teleradiology Services (India) Private Limited |   | India                                     |
| Merge Technologies Holdings Co.                                 |   | Nova Scotia, Canada                       |
|     Project Ready Corp.                     |   | Delaware                                  |
| Requisite Software Inc.                                         |   | Delaware                                  |

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26755]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT97-71-000]


Midcoast Interstate Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Tariff Filing 
To Reflect Change In Corporate Name

October 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 30, 1997, Midcoast Interstate 
Transmission, Inc. (MIT), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, certain tariff sheets, to be 
effective October 1, 1997 to reflect the change in its corporate name 
from Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company to Midcoast Interstate 
Transmission, Inc.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's rules 
and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26755 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Oliver Lee CLOUSER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-366.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

April 25, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
109 STAT. 776 PUBLIC LAW 104–72—DEC. 23, 1995

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1465:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):

Dec. 13, considered and passed Senate.

Dec. 18, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 104–72

104th Congress

An Act

To extend au pair programs.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AU PAIR PROGRAMS.

(a) REPEAL.—Section 8 of the Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship Act of 1990 (Public Law 101–454) is repealed.

(b) AUTHORITY FOR AU PAIR PROGRAMS.—The Director of the

United States Information Agency is authorized to continue to

administer an au pair program, operating on a world-wide basis,

through fiscal year 1997. (c) REPORT.—Not later than October 1, 1996, the Director of

the United States Information Agency shall submit a report regarding the continued extension of au pair programs to the Committee

on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on International Relations of the House of Representatives. This report

shall specifically detail the compliance of all au pair organizations

with regulations governing au pair programs as published on February 15, 1995.

Approved December 23, 1995.

104 Stat. 1065.

Dec. 23, 1995

[S. 1465]
II 

Calendar No. 395 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3046 

[Report No. 118–179] 

To make permanent the authority to collect Shasta-Trinity National Forest 

marina fees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 16, 2023 

Mr. PADILLA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

MAY 16, 2024 

Reported by Mr. MANCHIN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To make permanent the authority to collect Shasta-Trinity 

National Forest marina fees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3046 RS

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT AUTHORIZATION TO COLLECT 

2 SHASTA-TRINITY NATIONAL FOREST MARINA 

3 FEES. 

4 Section 422 of the Department of the Interior, Envi5 ronment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008 

6 (Public Law 110–161; 121 Stat. 2149; 123 Stat. 747; 128 

7 Stat. 346), is amended by striking ‘‘through fiscal year 

8 2019’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 395 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3046 

[Report No. 118–179] 

A BILL 

To make permanent the authority to collect ShastaTrinity National Forest marina fees. 

MAY 16, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GERSON OBED HERRERA GONZALES, AKA Gerson Obed Herrera Gonzalez,

Petitioner,

v. ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General ,

Respondent. No. 15

- 71468 Agency No. A088

- 889

- 362

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 16 , 202 1 * * Before: GRABER, FRIEDLAND, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. Gerson Obed Herrera Gonzales, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of re moval , and relief under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 18 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 15

- 71468

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Garcia

- Milian v. Holder , 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny the peti tion for review. Herrera Gonzales does not challenge the BIA’s determination that he waived his challenge to the IJ’s finding that his asylum application was untimely and that he was ineligible for CAT relief. See Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072,
1079

- 80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Herrera Gonzales did not establish past persecution

. See Baghdasary an v. Holder , 592 F.3d 1018, 1023 (9th Cir. 2010) (“An applicant alleging past persecution has the burden of establishing that (1) his treatment rises to the level of persecution; (2) the persecution was on account of one or more protected grounds; and (3) the persecution was committed by the government, or by forces that the government was unable or unwilling to control.”) ; see also Nagoulko v. INS , 333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir. 2003) (persecution is “an extreme concept that does not include every sort of treatment our society regards as offensive” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted))

. Herrera Gonzales does not raise, and therefore waives, any challenge to the agency’s determination that he failed to establish a clear probability of future pers ecution in Guatemala. See Lopez

- Vasquez , 706 F.3d at3 15

- 71468

1079

- 80

. Thus, Herrera Gonzales’ withholding of removal claim fails. As stated in the court’s August 6, 2015 order, the temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the mandate.
PETITIO N FOR REVIEW DENIED
.
Case 1:06-cv-00023-MBC-SPB Document 13 Filed 08/15/06 Page 1 of 2Case 1:06-cv-00023-MBC-SPB Document 13 Filed 08/15/06 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of PARK-LEXINGTON CORPORATION, Debtor. ANAHMA REALTY CORPORATION, Appellant.

No. 249.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 18, 1937.

George F. Thompson, of New York City, for appellant.

Lewis & Kelsey, of New York City (Frederick T. Kelsey and Pike P. Waldrop, both of New York City, of counsel), for debtor.

Meyer Kraushaar, of New York City, for intervener.

Clive C. Handy, of New York City (K. O. Mott-Smith, of New York City, of counsel), for New York Central R. Co. and the N. Y. State Realty & Terminal Co.

Pfeififer & Crames, of New York City (Alexander Pfeiffer and Morris G. Duchin, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellees Ivor B. Clark and Ivor B. Clark, Inc.

*1014McNamara & Seymour, of New York City (Charles Green Smith, of New York City, of counsel), for Empire Trust Co., as First Mortgage Trustee.

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, of New York City (Robert Le Roy, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees Karl H. Behr et al.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.3


                           Wire One Technologies, Inc.
                                 225 Long Avenue
                           Hillside, New Jersey 07205

                                                          As of January 1, 2003

Mr. Richard Reiss
10 Timber Acres Road
Springfield, New Jersey 07081

Dear Rich:

         This letter, when accepted by you, shall constitute an amendment to the
employment agreement, as previously amended (the "Agreement"), dated January 2,
2001, between Wire One Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") and you. The Company
and you hereby agree as follows:

         1. The Company has requested that, to contribute to an improvement in
the Company's financial condition and for no other reason, you agree, as an
amendment to paragraph 2(a) of the Agreement, to reduce your base salary
compensation thereunder so as to be payable at the rate of $330,000 per annum
during the period commencing as of the date hereof through December 31, 2003. In
consideration of the agreement by several other of the Company's executives to
salary reductions similar in nature, you hereby agree to the salary reduction
set forth in the preceding sentence.

         2. Paragraph 2(b) of the Agreement is amended, as of the date hereof,
to read in its entirety as follows:

     "You shall be entitled to receive such cash bonuses as the Company may,
     from time to time and in its sole discretion, determine."

         3. Except as modified hereby, the Agreement remains in full force and
effect.


                                           Yours very truly,

                                           WIRE ONE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                           By: /s/
                                               --------------------------------

ACCEPTED:

/s/
-----------------------------------
Richard Reiss