alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Henry Lee JOYNER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 0-181.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 4, 1971.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender: Gerald Sohn, Asst, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.3**

**DEGOLYER  AND MACNAUGHTON**

5001 SPRING VALLEY  ROAD  SUITE 800 EAST  DALLAS, TEXAS 75244

April 12, 2011

YPF S.A.  Macacha Guemes 515  C1106BKK Buenos Aires  Argentina

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     We hereby consent to the references  to DeGolyer and MacNaughton and to the inclusion of our two third-party letter  reports dated January 25, 2011, as set forth under the sections “Information  on the Company—Exploration and Production” and “Exhibits”  in YPF SA.’s report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 to  be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and the  incorporation by reference of the same information in Form F-3 documents that  have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by YPF S A.

     Our third party letter reports  contain our independent estimates of the proved oil, natural gas liquids, marketable  gas, and oil equivalent reserves as of September 30, 2010, of certain selected  properties in the Neuquina and San Jorge basins in Argentina in which YPF S.A.  holds interests.

|   | Very truly yours,                       |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON            |
|   | DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON                |
|   | Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716 |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7548

AARON LAMONT BARNES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JAMES S. GILMORE,

Respondent – Appellee.

No. 12-6398

AARON LAMONT BARNES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JAMES S. GILMORE,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior 

District Judge. (1:98-cv-00703-JCC)

Submitted: May 24, 2012 Decided: May 30, 2012
2

Before MOTZ and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Lamont Barnes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Lamont Barnes seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for 

reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition (No. 11-7548), and the 

district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion 

for reconsideration of that order (No. 12-6398). The orders are

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006); 

Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 
4

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Barnes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny Barnes’ motion to hold Appeal No. 11-7548 in abeyance, deny 

a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeals. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25638]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-5484-6]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information, (202) 564-7167 OR (202) 564-7153.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements filed September 15, 
1997 through September 19, 1997, pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 970365, Draft EIS, FHW, NM, New Mexico Highway 126 (NM-126), 
Cuba-La Cueva Road (also Known as Forest Highway 12) Improvement, COE 
Section 404 Permit and NPDES Permit, Sandoval and Rio Arriba Counties, 
NM, Due: November 14, 1997, Contact: Richard J. Cushing (303) 969-5910.
EIS No. 970366, Final EIS, AFS, AK, Swan Lake-Lake Tyee Intertie 
Project, Electrical Transmission Line and Associated Facilities 
Construction and Operation, Northwestern Portion of Revillagigedo 
Island from Upper Carroll Inlet to Behm Canal and the Northeastern 
Portion of Cleveland Peninsula from Spacious Bay to Bradfield Canal, 
Special-Use-Permit Issuance, Tongass, AK, Due: October 27, 1997, 
Contact: Bill Angelus (907) 225-2148.
EIS No. 970367, Final EIS, BLM, CA, Soledad Mountain Open Pit Leap 
Leach Gold Mine Project, Construction and Operation, Plan-of-Operations 
Approval, Mojave, Kern County, CA, Due: October 27, 1997, Contact: 
Ahmed Mohsen (760) 384-5421.
EIS No. 970368, Final EIS, BLM, NM, Little Rock Open-Pit Mine Project, 
Construction and Operation, Plan of Operations Approval, and Several 
Permits Issuance, Grant County, NM, Due: October 27, 1997, Contact: 
Juan Padilla (505) 525-4376.
EIS No. 970369, Draft EIS, AFS, MT, Wayup Mine/Fourth of July Road 
Access, Right-of-Way Grant, Kootenai National Forest, Libby Ranger 
District, Lincoln County, MT, Due: November 10, 1997, Contact: Jon 
Jeresek (406) 293-7773.
EIS No. 970370, Draft EIS, AFS, MT, Meadow Timber Sales, 
Implementation, Timber Harvesting, Road Construction and Prescribed 
Burning, Fortine Ranger District, Kootenai National Forest, Lincoln 
County, MT, Due: November 25, 1997, Contact: Joleen Dunham (406) 882-
4451.
EIS No. 970371, Final EIS, USN, PR, VA, Relocatable over the Horizon 
Radar (ROTHR) System Construction and Operation, New and Updated 
Information on Fort Allen as Potential Site, Commonwealth of Puerto 
Rico and Chesapeake, VA, Due: October 27, 1997, Contact: Ms. Linda 
Blount (757) 322-4892.

    Dated: September 23, 1997.
B. Katherine Biggs,
Associate Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 97-25638 Filed 9-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3116 

To amend Public Law 88–657 to require greater transparency in the consideration of projects for the Forest Service Legacy Road and Trail Remediation Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 24, 2023 

Mr. LUJA ́N (for himself and Mr. RISCH) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 

and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 88–657 to require greater transparency in the consideration of projects for the Forest 

Service Legacy Road and Trail Remediation Program, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transparency in Leg5 acy Road and Trail Remediation Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3116 IS

1 SEC. 2. FOREST SERVICE LEGACY ROAD AND TRAIL REME2 DIATION PROGRAM TRANSPARENCY. 

3 Section 8 of Public Law 88–657 (16 U.S.C. 538a) 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (c)(2)— 

6 (A) by striking subparagraph (B) and in7 serting the following: 

8 ‘‘(B) solicit and consider public input re9 gionally in selecting projects for funding under 

10 the Program by— 

11 ‘‘(i) publishing annually, for each re12 gion, a list of projects considered for fund13 ing under the Program; 

14 ‘‘(ii) accepting public comment on the 

15 projects described in clause (i); and 

16 ‘‘(iii) considering public comments in 

17 selecting projects for funding under the 

18 Program;’’; and 

19 (B) in subparagraph (D)— 

20 (i) in the matter preceding clause (i), 

21 by inserting ‘‘annually, for each region,’’ 

22 before ‘‘publish’’; and 

23 (ii) by striking clause (ii) and insert24 ing the following: 

25 ‘‘(ii) a list that includes a description 

26 of— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3116 IS

1 ‘‘(I) each project considered for 

2 funding under the Program; 

3 ‘‘(II) public comments received 

4 on each project described in subclause 

5 (I); 

6 ‘‘(III) the ranking within the ap7 plicable region of each project de8 scribed in subclause (I); and 

9 ‘‘(IV) the proposed outcome of 

10 each project funded under the Pro11 gram for the applicable fiscal year.’’; 

12 and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(f) DEFINITION OF REGION.—In this section, the 

15 term ‘region’ means one of the 9 regions of the Forest 

16 Service.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
II 

Calendar No. 559 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2068 

[Report No. 109–316] 

To preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District of 

Columbia. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2005 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. AKAKA, and Mr. LIEBERMAN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

JULY 31, 2006 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of 

the District of Columbia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMPOSITION OF SUPERIOR COURT. 

4 Section 903 of title 11 of the District of Columbia 

5 Code is amended by striking ‘‘fifty-eight’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘61’’. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
Calendar No. 559 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2068 

[Report No. 109

–316] 

A BILL 

To preserve existing judgeships on the Superior 

Court of the District of Columbia. 

JULY 31, 2006 

Reported without amendment 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          20,684
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,684
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,840
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,170
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,684
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,761
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,761)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.004)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30610 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BENNY RAY COLLINS, also known as Chop Collins, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CR-30010-17

-------------------- February 19, 2003 Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Benny Ray Collins, federal prisoner # 09912-035, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to take judicial notice of facts under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(f)(1). Collins’s motion stems from his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine hydrochloride for which he received a 151-month sentence. He did not appeal his sentence. The present motion asserts that his case should be remanded for resentencing and his sentence should be reducedNo. 02-30610 -2- because two of his prior convictions should have been excluded from the guideline sentencing computations. Collins’s motion was not authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3742(f)(1), which permits an appellate court to remand a case on direct appeal for further sentencing proceedings when it is determined that a sentence “was imposed in violation of law or imposed as a result of an incorrect application of the sentencing guidelines.” 18 U.S.C. § 3742(f)(1). Collins’s motion should have been denied for lack of jurisdiction, United States v. Early , 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994), and we affirm on that basis.
AFFIRMED.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the undersigned, Darren Holm, Chief Executive Officer of China Holdings, Inc, (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his  knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006  Of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.

Date:       September 6, 2007

/s/Darren J. Holm-------------------------Darren J. HolmChief Executive Officer

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the undersigned, Dempsey Mork, Chief Financial Officer of China Holdings, Inc, (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to hisknowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006  of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  September 6, 2007

/s/Dempsey K. Mork  -------------------------  Dempsey K. Mork  Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOSE PUPO CARRERA, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 03-0003 Erie

v. )

)

JOHN J. LaMANNA, et.al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on January 3,

2003, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. The case

was subsequently referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan [Doc.

No. 11]. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 24], filed on July

21, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be dismissed as moot. The parties

were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was

made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondents. No objections were filed. 

After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the

Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 16th day of August, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DISMISSED as moot. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 24] of Magistrate Judge Lenihan,

filed on July 21, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Lisa Pupo Lenihan, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:03-cv-00003-SJM-LPL Document 25 Filed 08/16/06 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of RPM Advantage.
(the "Registrant") for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David R. Pressler, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:   July 15, 2011


By:

/s/ DAVID R. PRESSLER


David R. Pressler
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
EXHIBIT 32.(a)

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted

            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Csaba Toro, the Chief Executive Officer of Euroweb  International  Corp. (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  the Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
     December 31, 2004 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of
     Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: March 30, 2005



                                             /s/Csaba Toro
                                             ----------------
                                             Name: Csaba Toro
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.2
                                                                    ------------








            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------



We  hereby  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-121439) and in the related Prospectus of our
report,  dated  April 1, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements
of  N-Viro  International Corporation included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2003.







  /s/  FOLLMER  RUDZEWICZ  PLC
------------------------------
FOLLMER  RUDZEWICZ  PLC


Southfield,  Michigan
March  29,  2005
109 STAT. 350 PUBLIC LAW 104–40—NOV. 1, 1995

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 268:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–189 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 104–51 (Comm. on Environment and Public Works).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):

Apr. 26, considered and passed Senate.

Oct. 17, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 104–40

104th Congress

An Act

To authorize the collection of fees for expenses for triploid grass carp certification

inspections, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COLLECTION OF FEES FOR TRIPLOID GRASS CARP CERTIFICATION INSPECTIONS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior, acting through

the Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service (referred to in this

section as the ‘‘Director’’), may charge reasonable fees for expenses

to the Federal Government for triploid grass carp certification

inspections requested by a person who owns or operates an aquaculture facility.

(b) AVAILABILITY.—All fees collected under subsection (a) shall

be available to the Director until expended, without further appropriations.

(c) USE.—The Director shall use all fees collected under subsection (a) to carry out the activities referred to in subsection

(a).

Approved November 1, 1995.

16 USC 2804

note.

Nov. 1, 1995

[S. 268]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6725** 

RUSSELL LEON DAVID, SR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. JON E. OZMINT, Director, S outh Carolina D epartment of Corrections; DONALD R. SAMPSON, Dr.; A. G. ALEWINE, Dr.; K
. MCCULLOUGH, Nurse; S. SHERMAN, Nurse , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort
. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 9:10

- cv - 01976

- RBH )

Submitted : October 20, 2011 De cided: November 3, 2011

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ , Circuit Judges.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion
. Russell Leon David, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Mason Abram Summers, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolin a, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Russell Leon David , Sr., seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S .C. § 1983 (2006) . The notice of appeal was received in the district court shortly after expiration of the appeal period. Because David is incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for maili ng to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). The record does not clearly reveal when David gave the notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this information from the parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack . The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED