52102 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 193 / Monday, October 6, 1997 / Notices

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities.

Number of Respondents: 1,996.

Estimated Hour Per Response: 37—

159 hours (average) per response.

Frequency of Response: On occasion

reporting requirement.

Cost to Respondents: $23,118,660.

Estimated Total Annual Burden:

8,071 hours.

Needs and Uses: On 4/3/97, the

Commission adopted a Fifth Report and

Order in MM Docket No. 87–268. This

Order adopted several rules with the

following objectives: (1) to promote the

success of free, universally available,

local broadcast television in a digital

world, thereby preserving free, widely

accessible programming that serves the

public interest; and (2) to attract

consumers swiftly to digital broadcast

service, thus allowing the NTSC

spectrum to be recovered and turned to

use for other beneficial purposes more

rapidly.

Section 336 of the

Telecommunications Act of 1996

requires that the Commission limit the

initial eligibility for digital television

(DTV) licenses to persons that, as of the

date of such issuance, are licensed to

operate a television broadcast station or

hold a permit to construct a television

broadcast station. The Commission has

issued a license to all eligible licensees

and permittees in the form of an

Appendix to the Fifth Report and Order

in MM Docket No. 87–268. By issuing

these DTV licenses with the Fifth Report

and Order, the Commission has frozen

initial eligibility and allowed the

completion of the Table of Allotments.

The license that we issued is a general

instrument of authorization for

licensees/permittees to receive and hold

a second 6 MHz channel for the purpose

of concerting to DTV. It is not an

authorization to begin construction or

operation.

To receive authorization for

commencement of DTV operation,

commercial broadcast licensees must

file FCC 301 for a construction permit.

This application may be filed anytime

after receiving the initial DTV license

but must be filed before the mid-point

in a particular applicant’s required

construction period. The Commission

has developed a new Section V–D for

DTV engineering which will be added to

the FCC 301. The Commission will

consider these applications as minor

changes in facilities. Applicants will not

have to supply full legal or financial

qualification information.

Federal Communications Commission.

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–26419 Filed 10–3–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Public Information Collections

Approved by Office of Management

and Budget

September 30, 1997.

The Federal Communications

Commission (FCC) has received Office

of Management and Budget (OMB)

approval for the following public

information collections pursuant to the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,

Public Law 104–13. An agency may not

conduct or sponsor and a person is not

required to respond to a collection of

information unless it displays a

currently valid control number. For

further information contact Shoko B.

Hair, Federal Communications

Commission, (202) 418–1379.

Federal Communications Commission

OMB Control No.: 3060–0512.

Expiration Date: 09/30/2000.

Title: ARMIS Annual SummaryReport

(Formerly titled, ‘‘ARMIS Quarterly

Report’’).

Form No.: FCC Report 43–01.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit.

Estimated Annual Burden: 150

respondents; 220 hours per response

(avg.); 33,000 total annual burden hours

for all collections.

Estimated Annual Reporting and

Recordkeeping Cost Burden: $0.

Frequency of Response: Annually.

Description: ARMIS was implemented

to facilitate the timely and efficient

analysis of revenue requirements and

rate of return to provide an improved

basis for audits and other oversight

functions, and to enhance the

Commission’s ability to quantify the

effects of alternative policy. The ARMIS

Annual Summary Report (FCC Report

43–01), formerly the ARMIS quarterly

Report, contains financial and operating

data and is used to monitor the local

exchange carrier industry and to

perform routine analyses of costs and

revenues. FCC Report 43–01 facilitates

the annual collection of the results of

accounting, rate base and cost allocation

requirements prescribed in parts 32, 36,

64, 65, and 69. The information

contained in the ARMIS Annual

Summary Report provides the necessary

detail to enable the Commission to

fulfill its regulatory responsibilities.

Automated reporting of these data

greatly enhances the Commission’s

ability to process and analyze the

extensive amounts of data that are

needed to administer its rules. It

facilitates the timely and efficient

analyses of revenue requirements, rates

of return and price caps, and provides

an improved basis for auditing and

other oversight functions. It also

enhances the Commission’s ability to

quantify the effects of policy proposals.

Section 220 of the Communications Act

of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 220,

allows the Commission, at its discretion,

to prescribe the forms of any and all

accounts, records, and memoranda to be

kept by carriers subject to this Act,

including the accounts, records, and

memoranda of the movement of traffic,

as well as of the receipts and

expenditures of moneys. Section 219(b)

of the Communications Act of 1934, as

amended, 47 U.S.C. 219(b), authorizes

the Commission by general or special

orders to require any carriers subject to

this Act to file annual reports

concerning any matters with respect to

which the Commission is authorized or

required by law to act. Section 43.21 of

the Commission’s rules details that

requirement. Obligation to respond:

mandatory.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0793.

Expiration Date: 03/31/98.

Title: Procedures for States Regarding

Lifeline Consents, Adoption of Intrastate

Discount Matrix for Schools and

Libraries, and Designation of Eligible

Telecommunications Carriers.

Form No.: N/A.

Respondents: Business or other for

profit; State, Local or Tribal

Government.

Estimated Annual Burden: 890

respondents; 1.25 hours per response

(avg.); 1120 total annual burden hours

for all collections.

Estimated Annual Reporting and

Recordkeeping Cost Burden: $0.

Frequency of Response: On occasion;

annually.

Description: On May 8, 1997 the

Commission released Federal-State Joint

Board on Universal Service, Report and

Order, CC Docket No. 96–45, FCC 97–

157 (Order). In that Order, the

Commission adopted rules providing

funding for discounts to eligible schools

and libraries. The Commission also

adopted rules mandating that state

commissions designate common carriers

as eligible telecommunications carriers

for service areas selected by state

commissions in accordance with section

214(e). States and carriers are subject to

the following requirements in order to

receive universal service support.

Section 54.403(a) of the Federal
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 193 / Monday, October 6, 1997 / Notices 52103

Communications Commission’s rules

requires states to approve an additional

reduction in the amount paid by any

low-income consumer in order to

receive additional federal Lifeline

support. 47 CFR 54.403(a). We request

states to send a one-page letter

authorizing the reduction of intrastate

rates. (No. of respondents: 50; annual

burden per respondent: .5 hours; total

annual burden: 25 hours). Section

54.505(e)(1) of the rules requires states

to adopt discounts at least equal to the

discounts established for interstate

services. 47 CFR 54.505(e)(1). Each state

must adopt an intrastate discount matrix

with entries at least equal to those of the

interstate discount matrix and send a

notification letter indicating that it has

done so. (No. of respondents: 50; annual

burden per respondent: 2 hours; total

annual burden: 100 hours). Section

54.201(b) requires states to designate

common carriers as eligible

telecommunications carriers for service

areas designated by the state

commission. 47 CFR 54.201(b). We

request that states submit a list of

carriers designated as eligible

telecommunications carriers and the

service areas such non-rural carriers are

required to serve. (No. of respondents:

50; annual burden per respondent: 1

hour; total annual hour burden: 50

hours). Section 153(37) of the

Communications Act of 1934, as

amended, requires any local exchange

carrier that seeks to be classified as a

rural telephone company to certify to its

status as a rural telephone company. 47

U.S.C. 153(37). Any local exchange

carrier that seeks to be classified as a

rural telephone company must file a

letter with the Commission by April 30

of each year notifying the Commission

that the LEC certifies itself to be a rural

telephone company and explaining how

the carrier meets at least one of the four

criteria. (No. of respondents: 840;

annual burden per respondent: 1 hour;

total annual hour burden: 840 hours). If

a LEC’s status changes so that it

becomes ineligible for certification as a

rural carrier, that carrier must inform

the Commission and the Universal

Service Administrator within one

month of the change in status. (No. of

respondents: 210; annual burden per

respondent: .5 hours; total annual hour

burden: 105 hours). All of the

requirements are necessary to

implement the congressional mandate

for universal service. These reporting

requirements are necessary to verify that

particular carriers and other

respondents are eligible to receive

universal service support. Obligation to

respond: mandatory.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0756.

Expiration Date: 03/31/98.

Title: Procedural Requirements and

Policies for Commission Processing of

InterLATA Services Under Section 271

of the Communications Act.

Form No.: N/A.

Respondents: Business or other for

profit.

Estimated Annual Burden: 75

respondents; 250 hours per response

(avg.); 18,820 total annual burden hours

for all collections.

Estimated Annual Reporting and

Recordkeeping Cost Burden: $0.

Frequency of Response: On occasion.

Description: In a Public Notice

released 9/19/97, the Commission

revises various procedural requirements

and policies relating to the

Commission’s processing of Bell

Operating Company (BOC) applications

to provide in-region, interLATA services

pursuant to section 271 of the

Communications Act of 1934, as

amended, 47 U.S.C. 271 (Act). These

procedures were originally established

in a Public Notice released December 6,

1996 (FCC 96–469). Section 271

provides for applications on a state-bystate basis. a. Submission of

Applications by the BOCs: BOCs must

file applications which provide

information on which the applicant

intends to rely in order to satisfy the

requirements of section 271. The

applications will contain two parts,

which include: (1) A stand-alone

document entitled Brief in Support of

Application by (Bell company name) for

Provision of In-region, InterLATA

Services in (State name) and (2) any

supporting documentation. The Brief in

Support will contain a concise summary

of substantive arguments presented in

the Brief, a statement identifying all of

the agreements that the applicant has

entered into pursuant to negotiations

and/or arbitration under section 252, a

statement identifying how the applicant

meets the requirements of section

271(c)(1), a statement summarizing the

status and findings of the relevant State

proceedings (if any) examining the

applicant’s compliance with section

271, a statement describing the efforts

the applicant has made to meet with

likely objectors to narrow the issues in

dispute, and all factual and legal

arguments that the three requirements of

section 271(d)(3) have been met. The

application must also contain the name,

address and phone number of the

person who will address inquiries

relating to access to any confidential

information submitted by the applicant,

and must contain an affidavit by an

officer or duly authorized employee that

‘‘all information supplied in the

application is true and accurate to the

best of its information and belief.’’ The

supporting documentation will contain,

at a minimum, the complete public

record of the relevant State proceedings

(if any) examining the applicant’s

compliance with section 271, records of

interconnection agreements, affidavits,

etc. The supporting documentation shall

be provided in appendices, separated by

tabs and divided into volumes as

appropriate. Each volume shall contain

a table of contents that lists the subject

of each tabbed section of that volume.

The application shall include a list of all

affidavits and the location of and

subjects covered by each of those

affidavits. The requirements of section

271(c)(2) will be met with this

supporting documentation. All factual

assertions, as well as expert testimony,

must be supported by an affidavit or

verified statement. All substantive

arguments must be made in a legal brief

(i.e., Brief in Support, comments, reply,

ex parte comments) and not in affidavits

or other supporting documentation. (No.

of respondents: 7; annual hour burden

per respondent: 125 hours; total annual

burden: 6125 hours). b. Submission of

Written Consultations by the State

Regulatory Commissions: State

regulatory commissions will file written

consultations relating to the

applications not later than

approximately 20 days after the

issuance of an Initial Public Notice

establishing specific due dates for

various filings. (No. of respondents: 49;

annual hour burden per respondent: 120

hours; total annual burden: 5880 hours).

c. Submission of Written Consultations

by the U. S. Department of Justice: The

Department of Justice will file written

consultations relating to the

applications not later than

approximately 35 days after the

issuance of the Initial Public Notice.

(No. of respondents: 1; annual hour

burden per respondent: 100 hours; total

annual burden: 4900 hours). d.

Submission of Written Comments by

Interested Third Parties: Interested third

parties may file comments on the

applications not later than

approximately 20 days after the

issuance of the Initial Public Notice. All

substantive arguments must be made in

a legal brief (i.e., Brief in Support,

comments, reply, ex parte comments)

and not in affidavits or other supporting

documentation. All parties submitting

confidential information must identify a

contact person who will address

inquiries relating to access to that

confidential information. Each volume

of supporting documentation submitted

by a party shall contain a table of
52104 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 193 / Monday, October 6, 1997 / Notices

contents that lists the subject of each

tabbed section of that volume. The party

shall include a list of all affidavits and

the location of and subjects covered by

each of those affidavits. Parties shall not

incorporate by reference, in their

comment or replies, entire documents or

significant portion of documents that

were filed in other proceedings, such as

comments filed in a previous section

271 proceeding. (No. of respondents: 75;

annual hour burden per respondent: 25

hours; total annual burden: 1875 hours).

e. Replies: All participants in the

proceeding may file a reply to any

comment made by any other participant.

Such replies will be due approximately

45 days after the Initial Public Notice is

issued. (No. of respondents: 10; annual

hour burden per respondent: 2 hours;

total annual burden: 20 hours). f.

Motions: A dispositive motion filed

with the Commission in a section 271

proceeding will be treated as an earlyfiled pleading and will not be subject to

a separate pleading cycle, unless the

Commission or Bureau determines

otherwise. Non-dispositive motions will

be subject to the default pleading cycle

in section 1.45 or our rules, unless the

Commission determines otherwise in a

public notice. (No. of respondents: 10;

annual hour burden per respondent: 2

hours; total annual burden: 20 hours).

All of the requirements would be used

to ensure that BOCs have complied with

their obligations under the

Communications Act of 1934, as

amended before being authorized to

provide in-region, interLATA services

pursuant to section 271. Obligation to

comply: mandatory.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0579.

Expiration Date: 09/30/2000.

Title: Expanded Interconnection with

Local Telephone Company Facilities For

Interstate Switched Transport Services

Form No.: N/A.

Respondents: Business or other for

profit.

Estimated Annual Burden: 16

respondents; 124.7 hours per response

(avg.); 1996 total annual burden hours

for all collections.

Estimated Annual Reporting and

Recordkeeping Cost Burden: $10,000.

Frequency of Response: On occasion.

Description: In the Second Report and

Order and Third Further Notice of

Proposed Rulemaking in the Expanded

Interconnection proceeding, CC Docket

No. 91–141 (Order), the Commission

took another step toward enhancing

competition in the access marketplace

by requiring Tier 1 local exchange

carriers (LECs), except NECA pool

members, to provide expanded

interconnection for interstate switched

transport services. In the Order, the

Commission required Tier 1 LECs,

except for NECA pool members, to

provide expanded opportunities for

third-party interconnection with their

interstate switched transport facilities.

The Commission concluded that

expanded interconnection will likely

increase competition, producing

significant benefits for consumers that

will outweigh any potential drawbacks.

In the Order, the Commission

concluded that the LECs should be

required to provide certain cost support

to justify the rate levels for the tariff

charges to be paid by interconnectors for

expanded interconnection. The

Commission required the price cap

LECs to provide cost support for the

connection charges using the same

methodology employed to support new

services under the price cap rules. The

Commission required the LECs to

develop and justify consistent

methodologies for deriving the direct

cost of providing similar types of

offerings, including expanded

interconnection services covered by the

connection charge elements. The

Commission also required the LECs to

justify any deviations from uniform

overhead loadings that they propose for

pricing connection charges, although it

did not specify a particular

methodology in advance. Under this

approach, if a LEC proposes to price

connection charges to reflect fully

distributed overhead loadings, the

Commission will compare such loadings

to the overhead loadings used for other

services and require justification for any

differences. Rate of return LECs must

support their rates under traditional cost

support requirements. The Commission

believes that this cost information is

necessary to ensure the proper pricing

of expanded interconnection offerings

since they will be used by the LECs’

competitors. The LECs may use

approved, commonly used public utility

ratemaking methodologies to develop

the required cost support, including

sampling and averaging of certain costs,

and thereby minimize the burden of this

requirement. Absent these requirements,

the Commission is concerned that the

LECs would have a strong incentive to

price these services in a manner that

would undermine the growth of

competition in interstate access. Unless

the interconnectors can purchase

expanded interconnection offerings at

rates that are just, reasonable, and

nondiscriminatory, mandating

expanded interconnection will not lead

to effective competition and the

anticipated benefits. Tariff filings to

implement the density pricing plans

and volume and term discounts

generally will be accompanied by the

support required under existing price

cap rules. This information is necessary

to ensure that rates for special access

services subject to density zone pricing

are just, reasonable, and

nondiscriminatory, and comply with the

Commission’s rules. The tariffs and cost

support information accompanying

them will be used by the FCC staff to

ensure that the tariff rates to be paid for

expanded interconnection and switched

transport services are just, reasonable,

and nondiscriminatory, as sections 201

and 202 of the Communications Act

require. Without this information, the

FCC would be unable to determine

whether the rates for these services are

just, reasonable, nondiscriminatory, and

otherwise in accordance with the law.

Tariffs will also be used by parties using

expanded interconnection and switched

transport offerings to ascertain the

charges and other terms and conditions

applicable to those offerings. Your

obligation to respond: mandatory.

OMB Control No.: 3060–0774.

Expiration Date: 09/30/2000.

Title: Federal-State Joint Board on

Universal Service—CC Docket No. 96–

45, 47 CFR 36.611–36.612, and 47 CFR

part 54.

Form No.: N/A.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; individuals or

households; not-for-profit institutions;

state, local or tribal government.

Estimated Annual Burden: 5,565,451

respondents; 3.1 hours per response

(avg.); 1,784,220 total annual burden

hours for all collections.

Estimated Annual Reporting and

Recordkeeping Cost Burden: $0.

Frequency of Response: On occasion;

annually, one-time requirements.

Description: Congress directed the

Commission to implement a new set of

universal service support mechanisms

that are explicit and sufficient to

advance the universal service principles

enumerated in section 254 of the

Telecommunications Act of 1996 and

such other principles as the

Commission believes are necessary and

appropriate for the protection of the

public interest, convenience and

necessity, and are consistent with the

Act. In the Report and Order issued in

CC Docket No. 96–45, the Commission

adopts rules that are designed to

implement the universal service

provisions of section 254. Specifically,

the Order addresses: (1) Universal

service principles; (2) services eligible

for support; (3) affordability; (4) carriers

eligible for universal service support; (5)

support mechanisms for rural, insular,
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 193 / Monday, October 6, 1997 / Notices 52105

and high cost areas; (6) support for lowincome consumers; (7) support for

schools, libraries, and health care

providers; (8) interstate subscriber line

charge and common line cost recovery;

and (9) administration of support

mechanisms. The reporting and

recordkeeping requirements contained

in CC Docket No. 96–45 are designed to

implement section 254 follow. The

reporting and recordkeeping are

necessary to ensure the integrity of the

program. All the collections are

necessary to implement the

congressional mandate for universal

service. The reporting and

recordkeeping requirements are

necessary to verify that the carriers and

other respondents are eligible to receive

universal service support. Obligation to

comply: mandatory.

Rule section/title (47 CFR) Hours per

response

Total annual

burden

a. 36.611(a) and 36.612—Submission and Updating information to NECA ............................................................. 20 ................ 26,800

b. 54.101(c)—Demonstration of exceptional circumstances for toll-limitation grace period ...................................... 50 ................ 100

c. 54.201(b)–(c)—Submission of eligibility criteria ..................................................................................................... 1 .................. 3,400

d. 54.201(d)(2)—Advertisement of services and charges ......................................................................................... 50 ................ 65,000

e. 54.205(a)—Advance notice of relinquishment of universal service ....................................................................... .5 ................. 50

f. 54.207(c)(1)—Submission of proposal for redefining a rural service area ............................................................. 125 .............. 6,250

g. 54.307(b)—Reporting of expenses and number of lines served ........................................................................... 2.5 (avg.) ..... 4,100

h. 54.401(b)(1)–(2)—Submission of disconnection waiver request ........................................................................... 2 .................. 100

i. 54.401(d)—Lifeline certification to the Administrator .............................................................................................. 1 .................. 1,300

j. 54.407(c)—Lifeline recordkeeping ........................................................................................................................... 80 ................ 104,000

k. 54.409(a)–(b)—Consumer qualification for Lifeline ................................................................................................ 5 min ........... 440,000

l. 54.409(b)—Consumer notification of Lifeline discontinuance ................................................................................. 5 min ........... 44,000

m. 54.418(b)—Link Up recordkeeping ....................................................................................................................... 80 ................ 104,000

n. 54.501(d)(4) and 54.516—Schools and Libraries recordkeeping .......................................................................... 41 (avg.) ...... 372,000

o. 54.504(b)–(c), 54.507(d) and 54.509(a)—Description of services requested and certification ............................. 2 .................. 100,000

p. 54.601(b)(4) and 54.609(b)—Calculating support for health care providers ......................................................... 100 .............. 340,000

q. 54.601(b)(3) and 54.619—Shared facility recordkeeping ...................................................................................... 21 (avg.) ...... 160,000

r. 54.607(b)(1)–(2)—Submission of proposed rural rate ............................................................................................ 3 .................. 150

s. 54.603(b)(1), 54.615(c)–(d) and 54.623(d)—Description of services requested and certification ........................ 1 .................. 12,000

t. 54.619(d)—Submission of rural health care report ................................................................................................. 40 ................ 40

u. 54.701(f)(1) and (f)(2)—Submission of annual report and CAM ........................................................................... 40 ................ 40

v. 54.701(g)—Submission of quarterly report ............................................................................................................ 10 ................ 40

w. 54.707—Submission of state commission designation ......................................................................................... .25 ............... 850

Public reporting burden for the

collections of information is as noted

above. Send comments regarding the

burden estimate or any other aspect of

the collections of information, including

suggestions for reducing the burden to

Performance Evaluation and Records

Management, Washington, DC 20554.

Federal Communications Commission.

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–26418 Filed 10–3–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–U

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

EXAMINATION COUNCIL

Community Reinvestment Act;

Interagency Questions and Answers

Regarding Community Reinvestment

AGENCY: Federal Financial Institutions

Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice and request for comment.

SUMMARY: The Consumer Compliance

Task Force of the Federal Financial

Institutions Examination Council

(FFIEC) is supplementing, amending,

and republishing its Interagency

Questions and Answers Regarding

Community Reinvestment. The

Interagency Questions and Answers

have been prepared by staff of the Office

of the Comptroller of the Currency

(OCC), the Federal Reserve Board

(Board), the Federal Deposit Insurance

Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of

Thrift Supervision (OTS) (collectively,

the ‘‘agencies’’) to answer most

frequently asked questions about

community reinvestment. The

Interagency Questions and Answers

contain informal staff guidance for

agency personnel, financial institutions,

and the public. Staff of the agencies seek

comment on the proposed questions and

answers concerning how to determine

whether particular activities have a

‘‘primary purpose’’ of community

development. In addition, staff also

invite public comment on the new and

revised questions and answers,

particularly the guidance regarding

home mortgage loans to middle- and

upper-income individuals in low- or

moderate-income areas.

DATES: Effective date of amended

Interagency Questions and Answers on

Community Reinvestment: October 6,

1997. The agencies request that

comments on the proposed questions

and answers be submitted on or before

December 5, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Questions and comments

may be sent to Joe M. Cleaver, Executive

Secretary, Federal Financial Institutions

Examination Council, 2100

Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 200,

Washington, DC 20037, or by facsimile

transmission to (202) 634–6556.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

OCC: Malloy Harris, National Bank

Examiner, Community and Consumer

Policy Division, (202) 874–4446; or

Margaret Hesse, Senior Attorney,

Community and Consumer Law

Division, (202) 874–5750, Office of the

Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219.

Board: Glenn E. Loney, Associate

Director, Division of Consumer and

Community Affairs, (202) 452–3585; or

Robert deV. Frierson, Assistant General

Counsel, Legal Division, (202) 452–

3711, Board of Governors of the Federal

Reserve System, 20th Street and

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,

DC 20551.

FDIC: Bobbie Jean Norris, National

Coordinator, Community Affairs and

Community Reinvestment, Division of

Compliance and Consumer Affairs,

(202) 942–3090; or Ann Hume Loikow,

Counsel, Legal Division, (202) 898–

3796, Federal Deposit Insurance

Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW.,

Washington, DC 20429.

OTS: Theresa A. Stark, Project

Manager, Compliance Policy, (202) 906–

7054; or Richard R. Riese, Project

Manager, Compliance Policy, (202) 906–