alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                                                    ------------

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Donald R. Katz, certify that:

1.     I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of Audible, Inc.;

2.     Based  on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of  a  material  fact  or  omit  to  state a material fact necessary to make the
statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the  period  covered  by this report;

3.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this  report;

4.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(3)  and  15d-115(e))  for the registrant and  have:

     a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or  caused such
disclosure controls and procedures designed under our supervision to ensure that
material  information  relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others
within  the entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;  and

     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this  report  based  on  such  evaluation;  and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the registrant's most recent
fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely to
materially  affect,  the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.     The  registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our  most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of the registrant's board of
directors:

     a)  All  significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation  of  internal  controls  over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize  and  report  financial  information  and

     b)  Any  fraud,  whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees  who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting


November ___, 2003                 By:______________________________
                                   Name:  Donald  R.  Katz
                                   Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)


<PAGE>
<PAGE>     E-15
                                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                             CHATWINS GROUP, INC.
                      COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
            (In thousands, except share and per share information)

                                             YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                  -------------------------------------------
                                     1994     1995     1996     1997     1998
                                  -------  -------  -------  -------  -------
     EARNINGS:
Income (loss) from continuing
  operations                      $   (26) $ 3,062  $(1,240) $ 2,455  $    48
Dividends paid or accreted to
  preferred stock                    (450)    (456)    (456)    (456)    (456)
                                  -------  -------  -------  -------  -------
     Earnings applicable to
       common stock                  (476)   2,606   (1,696)   1,999     (408)

Income (loss) from discontinued
  operations                        1,191    1,231      801     (196)  (1,519)
Extraordinary item                   (201)       -        -        -        -
                                  -------  -------  -------  -------  -------
     Net earnings applicable
       to common stock            $   514  $ 3,837  $  (895) $ 1,803  $(1,927)
                                  =======  =======  =======  =======  =======

     COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Average equivalent outstanding    243,242  292,887  242,887  292,887  265,088
                                  =======  =======  =======  =======  =======

     EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
Continuing operations             $ (1.96) $  8.90  $ (6.98) $  6.82  $ (1.54)
Discontinued operations              4.90     4.20     3.30    (0.66)   (5.73)
Extraordinary item                  (0.83)       -        -        -        -
                                  -------  -------  -------  -------  -------
     EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE    $  2.11  $ 13.10  $ (3.68) $  6.16  $ (7.27)
                                  =======  =======  =======  =======  =======
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Remedent, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. 

|   |                     |               |                          |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | Date: June 8, 2007  |               |
|   | By:            | /s/ Robin List     |                          |
|   |                     | Name:    | Robin List               |   |
|   |                     | Title:   | Chief Executive Officer  |   |
|   |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Remedent, Inc. and will be retained by Remedent, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATIONADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

## H WASHINGTON, DC 

## 102016

In theMatter of: FAADOCKET No. NotAssigned FederalExpress Corporation Respondent
JudgeDouglasM. Rawald FAA CaseNo.2014SW700042 (Civil PenaltyAction) DMS No. FDMS No. 2014-0864



### WITHDRAWAL OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT NOW COMES the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA") through counsel pursuant to Rule 215 of the Rules of Practice in FAA Civil PenaltyActions, 14 CFR § 13.215. Pursuant to Rule 215, the Federal AviationAdministration hereby withdraws its Second Amended Complaint in this matter. It states the following: 1. On November 24, 2015, the Federal Aviation Administration filed its SecondAmended Complaint. 2. Since the filing of its Second Amended Complaint, we have reviewed this matter. We find that legal enforcement action in this case is not warranted. Accordingly, we hereby withdraw the Second Amended Complaint. 

## r''\**~=1p**

### Patricia A. McNall Acting Assistant Chief Counsel for Enforcement

, ,/') I



# Cy"~"'~~

/ J

**~es** 

### Archier, SenrorAttorney // nforcement Division, Southwest Team / FederalAviation Administration / 10101 Hillwood Parkway Fort Worth, Texas 76177 E-mail: james.archier@faa.gov Telephone: (817) 222-5099 (Main) (817) 222-5074 (Direct) (817) 222-5945 (Fax)

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Re: Federal Express Corporation, FAA Case No. 2014SW700042 I hereby certifythat on this day, I have sent via Federal Express an executed original andone copy of theWithdrawal of SecondAmendedComplaint, addressed as follows: Hearing Docket Attention Hearing Docket Clerk Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue, SW Washington DC 20591 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 Washington, DC 20591 I further certifythat on this date, I have sent via Federal Express a true copy of theWithdrawal of SecondAmended Complaint, addressed as follows to:

TEL: (202) 393-9285 FAX: (202) 628-0654 Mr. Greg G. Stofko SeniorAttorney Regulatory Affairs Federal Express Corporation 1700 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 950 Washington, DC 20006

EMAIL: greg.stofko@fedex.com

TEL: (202) 496-7356 Allan H. Horowitz McKenna Long &Alridge LLP 1900 KStreet, NW Washington DC 20006

EMAIL: ahorowitz@mckennalong.com

3The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald Administrative Law Judge Office of Hearings, M-20 U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590

TEL: (202) 366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: (202) 366-7536

Patricia A. McNall Acting Assistant Chief Counsel for Enforcement



# ~~· s Archier, Senior Attorney Enfo cement Division, Southwest Fe ral AviationAdministration

0101 Hillwood Parkway Fort Worth, Texas 76177 E-mail: james.archier@faa.gov Telephone: (817) 222-5099 (Main) (817) 222-5074 (Direct) (817) 222-5945 (Fax)

4 Dated: May 17, 2016
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Carlos NORMAN, Appellee.

No. II-468.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 19, 1978.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals an order granting ap-pellee’s habeas corpus petition in an extradition proceeding. We agree that the court erred and reverse. It is well established that the scope of inquiry in this type of a proceeding is limited to a determination of whether the jurisdictional prerequisites to the issuance of the extradition warrant exist. *State v. Cox,*306 So.2d 156 (Fla.2d DCA 1974). Here it is clear from the record that the jurisdictional requirements for extradition were met and the matters urged by appellee exceeded the proper scope of inquiry. Therefore, the order granting appellee’s petition for habeas corpus is reversed and the case is remanded with directions to enter an order delivering appellee to the appropriate agent for the State of Arkansas.

McCORD, Chief Judge, and MILLS and BOYER, JJ., concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 131601-3 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### WILLIAM E. KASBEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 131601-3 COA: 247297; 253201; 254295 Leelanau CC: 96-003816-DO BERYL W. HOFFMAN, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 30, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0122 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2007

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM  THE
     CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE ACcOMPANYING FORM 10-K
     OF  RC/ARBY'S  CORPORATION  FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND  IS
     QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.      
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,411
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,659 
<INVENTORY>                                     12,110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,767
<PP&E>                                          29,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,139
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 360,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          172,591
<BONDS>                                        281,110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (113,969)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   360,444
<SALES>                                        409,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               466,352
<CGS>                                          252,811
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  252,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,095
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (73,904)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (23,346)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (50,558)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (50,558)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27302]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 97-151]


NASA Advisory Council, Minority Business Resource Advisory 
Committee Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a forthcoming meeting of the NASA Advisory 
Council, Minority Business Resource Advisory Committee.

DATES: November 6, 1997, 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., and November 7, 1997, 
9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: NASA Headquarters, 300 E Street SW, Room 9H40, Washington, 
DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ralph C. Thomas III, Office of 
Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration, Room 9K70, 300 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20546, 
(202) 358-2088.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is a 
follows:

--Call to Order
--Reading of Minutes
--Small Disadvantaged Business Implementation Plan
--Report on NAC Meeting
--Public Comment
--Subpanel Reports
--New Business
--Adjourn

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    October 7, 1997.
Alan M. Ladwig,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-27302 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TransDigm Holding
Company (the Company) for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended March 27, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory Rufus, Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the
Company for the periods indicated.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 5, 2004



/s/    Gregory RufusName: Gregory Rufus Title: Vice President,
Chief Financial          Officer and Assistant Secretary          (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

| (1) | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended      December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.      78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                                           |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | /s/ Yossi Attia                                                                                |   |
|   |   | Name:      Yossi AttiaTitle:      Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial      Officer |   |

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-41066

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARTURO MENDOZA-JIMENEZ,

also known as Mario Jimenez Mendoza,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-02-CR-151-1

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Arturo Mendoza-Jimenez appeals his guilty plea conviction

and sentence for being found in the United States after

deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. MendozaJimenez argues that the sentencing provisions in 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) are unconstitutional on their face and as applied in

his case. He contends that the unconstitutional portions of

8 U.S.C. § 1326 should be severed from the statute. He asks us
No. 02-41066

-2-

to vacate his conviction and sentence, reform the judgment to

reflect a conviction only under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and remand

his case for resentencing under that provision. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Mendoza-Jimenez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been called

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 489-90

(2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review.

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). Accordingly, the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED. 

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. The Government asks that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

HECTOR HUERTAS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 09-139 Erie

v. )

)

RAYMOND J. SOBINA, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on June 11, 2009, and

was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and

recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and

Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's oral Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 32], entered

on the record on January 27, 2010, recommended that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary

Injunction [Doc. No. 26] be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days in which to

file objections and no objections were filed. After de novo review of the motion and

documents in the case, as well as the transcript of the hearing on the Plaintiff’s motion

for preliminary injunction [Doc. No. 33], and together with the oral Report and

Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 17 day of February, 2010; th

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Doc.

No. 26] is DENIED. 

The oral Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 32] of Magistrate Judge Baxter,

entered on the record on January 27, 2010, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:09-cv-00139-SJM-SPB Document 34 Filed 02/17/10 Page 1 of 1