alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark J. Wattles, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Hollywood
Entertainment Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 12, 2004

                            /s/ Mark J. Wattles
                            -----------------------
                            Mark J. Wattles
                            Chief Executive Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

The Board of Trustees and Shareholders of
Keystone Property Trust:

We consent to the reference to our firm under the heading Experts in the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-59251, 333-67637, 333-74277,
333-77627, 333-89095, 333-92741, 333-31504 and 333-110450) and Form S-8 (File
No. 333-70529).

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 18, 2004

1
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3222 

AN ACT 

To ensure the security of office space rented by Senators, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3222 ES

1 SECTION 1. SECURITY OF OFFICE SPACE RENTED BY SEN2 ATORS. 

3 Section 3 of the Legislative Branch Appropriation 

4 Act, 1975 (2 U.S.C. 6317) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (b)— 

6 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) 

7 through (12) as subparagraphs (A) through 

8 (L), respectively; 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘The aggregate’’ and in10 serting ‘‘(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the ag11 gregate’’; and 

12 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(2) The aggregate square feet of office space for 

14 purposes of paragraph (1) shall not include any portion 

15 of the office space used for security or safety enhance16 ments that are— 

17 ‘‘(A) of a kind authorized by the Committee on 

18 Rules and Administration of the Senate, which shall 

19 include an information technology security closet 

20 and a secure lobby or reception area; and 

21 ‘‘(B) approved by the Sergeant at Arms and 

22 Doorkeeper of the Senate.’’; and 

23 (2) in subsection (c)(1)— 

24 (A) by striking ‘‘The maximum’’ and in25 serting ‘‘(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), the 

26 maximum’’; and 
3 

†S 3222 ES

1 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(B) The portion of the cost of a rental described 

3 in subparagraph (A) that is attributable to building secu4 rity and safety measures shall not be included in deter5 mining the annual rate paid for the rental for purposes 

6 of subparagraph (A) if— 

7 ‘‘(i) the costs are for building security and safe8 ty measures— 

9 ‘‘(I) of a kind authorized by the Committee 

10 on Rules and Administration of the Senate, 

11 which shall include guard services, access con12 trol, and facility monitoring; and 

13 ‘‘(II) approved by the Sergeant at Arms 

14 and Doorkeeper of the Senate; and 

15 ‘‘(ii) such costs are itemized separately in a 

16 manner approved by the Sergeant at Arms and 

17 Doorkeeper of the Senate.’’. 

Passed the Senate November 2, 2023. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3222 

AN ACT 

To ensure the security of office space rented by 

Senators, and for other purposes.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 5149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. 96-ACE-16]


Amendment to Class E Airspace, Hays, KS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule amends the Class E airspace area at Hays Municipal 
Airport, Hays, KS. A review of Class E airspace revealed a need to 
increase the airspace area to contain Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) 
operations at Hays Municipal Airport. The effect of this rule is to 
provide additional controlled airspace for aircraft executing the 
Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAP) and for departing 
aircraft to transition into controlled airspace.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC March 27, 1997.

FOR FURHTER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Operations Branch, ACE-530C, Federal Aviation Administration, 601 East 
12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106: telephone Number (816) 426-
3408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on October 30, 
1996, (61 FR 55882). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure 
for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be 
no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public 
that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written 
adverse comment or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on March 27, 1997. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this notice confirms that this final rule will become 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on January 3, 1997.
Christopher R. Blum,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 97-2644 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                       OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Microfield Group, Inc.
(the "Company") for the twelve months ended January 1, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I,
A. Mark Walter the principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of this 19th day of May
2005.

/s/ A. MARK WALTER
    --------------
     A. Mark Walter
     Acting Chief Financial Officer

                                       88
Exhibit 21.1
                                                                    ------------

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
-----------------------------------

Bio  Mineral  Transportation,  LLC  (Ohio)
National  N-Viro  Tech.,  Inc.  (Ohio)
Florida  N-Viro,  LP  (Delaware)
Florida  N-Viro  Management,  LLC  (Delaware)
Midwest  N-Viro,  Inc.  (Illinois)
Tennessee-Carolina  N-Viro,  Inc.  (Tennessee)
N-Viro  Soil  South,  Inc.  (Florida)
N-Viro  Honolulu,  Inc.  (Hawaii)
Pan-American  N-Viro,  Inc.  (Delaware)
BioCheck  Laboratories,  Inc.  (Ohio)
American  N-Viro  Resources,  Inc.  (Ohio)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27131]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities; Arts and 
Artifacts Indemnity Panel Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(P.L. 92-463 as amended) notice is hereby given that a meeting of the 
Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel of the Federal Council on the Art 
and the Humanities will be held at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20506, in Room 714, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., on 
Monday, November 24, 1997.
    The purpose of the meeting is to review applications for 
Certificates of Indemnity submitted to the Federal Council on the Arts 
and Humanities for exhibitions beginning after January 1, 1998.
    Because the proposed meeting will consider financial and commercial 
data and because it is important to keep values of objects, methods of 
transportation and security measures confidential, pursuant to the 
authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to Close 
Advisory Committee Meetings, dated July 19, 1993, I have determined 
that the meeting would fall within exemptions (4) and (9) of 5 U.S.C. 
552(b) and that it is essential to close the meeting to protect the 
free exchange of views and to avoid interference with the operations of 
the Committee.
    It is suggested that those desiring more specific information 
contact the Advisory Committee Management Officer, Nancy E. Weiss, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506, or call (202) 606-
8322.
Nancy E. Weiss,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-27131 Filed 10-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Genzyme Transgenics Corporation on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-82982 and 33-97024)
and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-69516, 33-69518, 33-69520, 33-84706, 33-88030,
33-92970, 33-92998 and 333-04535) of our report dated February 24, 1997, except
as to the information presented in Note 13 for which the date is March 17, 1997,
on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Genzyme Transgenics
Corporation as of December 29, 1996 and December 31, 1995 and for each of the
three fiscal years in the period ended December 29, 1996, which report is
included in this 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                       /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
                                       ----------------------------
                                           COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 1997
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:09-CR-346

:

v. : (Chief Judge Conner)

:

GREGORY O’NEAL :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2016, upon consideration of the pro se 

motion (Doc. 262) of defendant Gregory O’Neal (“O’Neal”), wherein O’Neal seeks 

reconsideration of the court’s order (Doc. 261) of June 30, 2016, denying his motion 

(Doc. 260) to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

after finding that same is a second or successive motion filed without permission of 

the appropriate court of appeals, (Doc. 261); see 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(A), 2255(h), 

and it appearing that O’Neal’s sole basis for objecting to the court’s prior order is 

his perception and cursory assertion that the ruling constitutes “an invasion of the 

5th Amendment’s public guaranteed protection against arbitrary and illegitimate 

actions committed against the people by the United States Corporation,” (Doc. 262 

at 1), but that O’Neal identifies neither legal nor factual error in the court’s prior 

ruling, it is hereby ORDERED that O’Neal’s motion (Doc. 262) for reconsideration 

is DENIED.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania

Case 4:09-cr-00346-CCC Document 263 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             473
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            4155
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       6363
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           25526
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             25566
<LOANS>                                         221496
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1405
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  271185
<DEPOSITS>                                      153163
<SHORT-TERM>                                     45100
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               5690
<LONG-TERM>                                      19800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                       47403
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  271185
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  17702
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 2213
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    50
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 19965
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                7704
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10827
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             9138
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      350
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   5670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4105
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        4105
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2440
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.56
<LOANS-NON>                                        404
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1075
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       20
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1405
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           1405
        

</TABLE>
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

ARMANDO MEDRANO VALENZUELA , Petitioner

.

No. 1 CA

- CR 22

- 0477 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2011

- 006301

- 001 CR2011

- 006 241

- 001 The Honorable Pamela Gates , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Krista Wood Counsel for Respondent

Armando Medrano Valenzuela , Eloy Petitioner FILED 4-6-2023ST ATE v. VALENZUELA Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Paul J. McMurdie, Judge Michael J. Brown , and Judge Michael S. Catlett delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Armando Medrano Valenzuela seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Proce dure 32. This is Petitioner’s third petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is the petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ari z. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find t he petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6856

JUAN MANUEL JUAREZ-REYES,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

CARLTON JOYNER, Administrator, Harnett Correctional 

Institution,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., District Judge. (5:13-cv-00068-RJC)

Submitted: August 29, 2013 Decided: September 4, 2013

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juan Manuel Juarez-Reyes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Juan Manuel Juarez-Reyes seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Juarez-Reyes has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We also deny Juarez-Reyes’ motion for transcripts

at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53850-53851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27383]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 04/04-0270]


CF Investment Company; Notice of Issuance of a Small Business 
Investment Company License

    On March 15, 1995, an application was filed by CF Investment 
Company, at 102 South Main Street, Greenville, South Carolina 29601, 
with the Small Business Administration (SBA) pursuant to section 
107.300 of the Regulations governing small business investment 
companies (13 CFR 107.300 (1996)) for a license to operate as a small 
business investment company.
    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to section 301(c) of the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, after having 
considered the application and all other pertinent information, SBA 
issued License No. 04/04-0270 on

[[Page 53851]]

September 17, 1997, to CF Investment Company to operate as a small 
business investment company.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59.011, Small 
Business Investment Companies)

    Dated: October 6, 1997.
Don A. Christensen,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 97-27383 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P