alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FOURTH SHIFT
CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 12/31/96 AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED 12/31/96
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,435
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,820<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        596
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,007
<PP&E>                                          12,233
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,093)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,172
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,660
<BONDS>                                          2,304
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,172
<SALES>                                         25,488
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,310
<CGS>                                            4,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    36
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,198
<INCOME-TAX>                                       189
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,009
<DISCONTINUED>                                     761
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,770
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THESE ASSETS VALUES REPRESENT AMOUNTS NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Charles William FOX, III v. ARGONAUT SOUTHWEST INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 4043.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 12, 1970.

*401Kierr & Gainsburgh, Jesse R. Adams, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiff-relator.

Adams & Reese, Henry B. Alsobrook, Jr., New Orleans, for defendant-respondent.

Before REGAN, REDMANN, and CHASEZ, JJ.

REDMANN, Judge.

In this suit against the insurer of a hospital and the doctors there practicing, an element of plaintiff’s negligence complaint is that an electrocardiogram was not properly interpreted by an intern in the hospital emergency room. Plaintiff complains that the doctor was negligent, and the hospital was negligent in having in its emergency room a doctor who was not competent to read EKGs.

During pre-trial discovery depositions, the doctor declined, on advice of counsel for defendant, to express his interpretation of other EKGs of plaintiff which are in the hospital files. Plaintiff applied to the trial court for an order to compel the doctor’s testimony in this regard, but was refused.

Certiorari was granted.

Plaintiff argues he seeks the testimony only to show the *fact*that the doctor is of certain opinions (which plaintiff might then show are not within the reasonable range of acceptable medical opinions) as a step in proving the doctor is incompetent, and that the hospital was negligent in employing an incompetent.

Defendant argues the testimony sought is expert opinion testimony, which this doctor is not qualified to give and which is not discoverable anyway, citing Barnett v. Barnett Enterprises, Inc., 182 So.2d *728*(La.App.1966).

The facts plaintiff seeks to establish are irrelevant to his cause of action. He alleges the doctor was an employee of the hospital, plainly in the course and scope of his employment, and that the defendant’s policy insures both the doctor and the employer-hospital. A showing that injury resulted from the doctor’s negligence on the particular occasion is both indispensable and sufficient to plaintiff’s recovery.

Inadmissibility is not a valid objection if the testimony sought is “reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence”, LSA-C.C.P. art. 1436. But we are unable to perceive any such result here, and applicant’s counsel has not suggested any.

Plaintiff is not entitled to discover the irrelevant information he seeks. The ruling of the trial judge is correct, and the writ of certiorari is recalled.

Writ recalled.
EXHIBIT 32.1



WRITTEN STATEMENT
 PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Richard K. Matros, the Chief Executive Officer, of Sun Healthcare Group, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, hereby certifies that:



(i)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 5, 2004 | /s/ Richard K. Matros
|------------------- | ---------------------
|                    | Richard K. Matros    



---

WRITTEN STATEMENT
 PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Kevin W. Pendergest, the Chief Financial Officer, of Sun Healthcare Group, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, hereby certifies that:



(i)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 5, 2004 | /s/ Kevin W. Pendergest
|------------------- | -----------------------
|                    | Kevin W. Pendergest
Exhibit 23.2


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report (and to all references to our Firm),  dated February 3, 1998 (except with
respect to the matters  discussed in Notes 2 and 14 of the  Company's  financial
statements,  as to which the date is October  7,  1998),  included  in this Form
10-K, into the Company's  previously  filed  Registration  Statements  Files No.
33-66624, No. 33-85420, No. 333-00404, No. 333-63863,and No. 333-38300.




/s/ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Vienna, VA
November 9, 2000
#### PGL OF GEORGIA, INC., Petitioner, v. GIFFEN ROOFING COMPANY, d/b/a Giffen Industries of Orlando, Inc., and R. J. Coody and Associates, Inc., Respondents.

No. 78-298.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 6, 1978.

David C. Beers of Rogers & Dowling, Orlando, for petitioner.

S. William Fuller of Berry & Fuller, Sanford, for respondent Giffen.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.

CROSS, ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1





WRITTEN STATEMENT


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350











The undersigned, William A. Mathies, the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), of Sun Healthcare Group, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, hereby certifies that:





(i)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 1, 2011
/s/ William A. MathiesWilliam A. Mathies
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Frederick CUNDIFF, Appellee.

No. 69-52.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 19, 1970.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; Edward J. Hanlon, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lavon J. Lee WOLFE.

No. 60780.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

In re: Lavon J. “Lee” Wolfe applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ denied. Ruling of trial judge is correct. (Parish of St. Charles).
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ HUSSEIN A. ENAN                               |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Hussein A. Enan                                   |   |
| Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| Dated: August 7, 2012                             |   |
|                                              |   |

| /s/ STEVEN J. YASUDA                                 |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Steven J. Yasuda                                     |   |
| Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer |   |
| Dated: August 7, 2012                                |   |
#### Doris McNeill LEWIS et al. v. James McNEILL et al.

No. 49883.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 18, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 15, 1978.

Jimmie H. Fields, Meridian, for appellant.

Riddell & Dabbs, Gilford F. Dabbs, III, Quitman, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3249 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3249

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To designate the outpatient clinic of the Department of Veterans 
  Affairs in Wyandotte County, Kansas City, Kansas, as the ``Captain 
                      Elwin Shopteese VA Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF CAPTAIN ELWIN SHOPTEESE VA CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The outpatient clinic of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs located at 9201 Parallel Parkway, Kansas City, Kansas, 
shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and 
designated as the ``Captain Elwin Shopteese Department of Veterans 
Affairs Clinic'' or the ``Captain Elwin Shopteese VA Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the outpatient 
clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the Captain Elwin Shopteese VA Clinic.

            Passed the Senate May 2, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3249

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To designate the outpatient clinic of the Department of Veterans 
  Affairs in Wyandotte County, Kansas City, Kansas, as the ``Captain 
                      Elwin Shopteese VA Clinic''.
```
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report, dated February 3, 1998 (except with respect to the matters discussed in
Notes 2 and 14 of the Company's financial statements, as to which the date is
October 7, 1998), included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously
filed Registration Statements Files No. 33-66624, No. 33-85420, No. 333-00404,
No. 333-63863,and No. 333-63861.




/s/ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Washington, D.C.
November 19, 1998
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Robert ARD, Respondent.

No. 39663.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 11, 1970.

Rehearing Denied July 13, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 233 So.2d 439.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         16,343
<SECURITIES>                                   43,196
<RECEIVABLES>                                  57,950
<ALLOWANCES>                                   679
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,607
<PP&E>                                         1,565
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,983
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,078
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1
<COMMON>                                       9
<OTHER-SE>                                     8,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,983
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               10,076
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               351
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                10
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   10
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.01
        


</TABLE>
#### CENTRAL BANK v. Robert V. BISHOP.

No. 61626.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 3, 1978.

In re: Robert Y. Bishop applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Ouachita. 353 So.2d 1109.

Writ denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54445-54446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27719]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Fossil Energy


National Coal Council; Notice of Open Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Name: National Coal Council.
    Date And Time: Friday, November 14, 1997, 8:30 am.
    Place: Hyatt Regency, Westshore, 6200 Courtney Campbell 
Causeway, Tampa, FL.
    Contact: Margie D. Biggerstaff, U.S. Department of Energy, 
Office of Fossil Energy (FE-5), Washington, D.C. 20585, Telephone: 
202/586-3867.
    Purpose of the Council: To provide advice, information, and 
recommendations to the Secretary of Energy on matters relating to 
coal and coal industry issues.

[[Page 54446]]

Tentative Agenda

--Call to order and opening remarks by Clifford Miercort, Chairman 
of the National Coal Council.
--Approve agenda.
--Remarks by Department of Energy representative.
--Report of the Coal Policy Committee.
--Administrative reports.
--Coal's Future--Technological Challenges and Opportunities, Kurt 
Yeager, President & CEO Electric Power Research Institute.
--Global Climate Change Forum.
--Discussion of any other business properly brought before the 
Council.
--Public comment--10-minute rule.
--Adjournment.

    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. The 
Chairman of the Council is empowered to conduct the meeting in a 
fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Any 
member of the public who wishes to file a written statement with the 
Council will be permitted to do so, either before or after the 
meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements 
pertaining to agenda items should contact Margie D. Biggerstaff at 
the address or telephone number listed above. Requests must be 
received at least five days prior to the meeting and reasonable 
provisions will be made to include the presentation on the agenda.

    Transcript: Available for public review and copying at the 
Public Reading Room, Room 1E-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC, between 9:00 AM and 4:00 
PM, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued at Washington, D.C., on October 15, 1997.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Deputy Committee Advisory, Management Advisory Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-27719 Filed 10-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
EXHIBIT 21


                       HOST INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                       LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES





              DOMESTIC                                  FOREIGN
--------------------------------------  ---------------------------------------

Gladieux Corporation                    Host International of Canada, Ltd.

Host International Inc. of Maryland     Marriott Airport Concessions Pty Ltd.

Michigan Host, Inc.                     Host of Holland B.V.

The Gift Collection, Inc.               Horeca Exploitatie Maatschappij 
                                          Schiphol, B.V.

Host Gifts, Inc.                        Marriott Airport Terminal Services, Inc.

Host Services of New York, Inc.         Host Services Pty Ltd.

Sunshine Parkway Restaurants, Inc.

Host International, Inc. of Kansas

Las Vegas Terminal Restaurants, Inc.

Turnpike Restaurants, Inc.

Host Marriott Services U.S.A., Inc.

HMS Holdings, Inc.

Host Services, Inc.

Cincinnati Terminal Services, Inc.

Cleveland Airport Services, Inc.

Marriott Family Restaurants, Inc.






                                   E-1
SAFE TRANSPORTATION Raised Crosswalk FOR EVERY PEDESTRIAN 

COUNTERMEASURE TECH SHEET 

Raised crosswalks are ramped speed tables spanning 

the entire width of the roadway, often placed at midblock 

crossing locations. The crosswalk is demarcated with paint 

and/or special paving materials. These crosswalks act as 

traffc-calming measures that allow the pedestrian to cross 

at grade with the sidewalk. 

In addition to their use on local and collector streets, raised 

crosswalks can be installed in campus settings, shopping 

centers, and pick-up/drop-off zones (e.g., airports, schools, 

transit centers). 

Raised crosswalks are fush with the height of the sidewalk. 

The crosswalk table is typically at least 10 feet wide 

and designed to allow the front and rear wheels of a 

passenger vehicle to be on top of the table at the same 

time. Detectable warnings (truncated domes) and curb 

ramps are installed at the street edge for pedestrians with 

impaired vision. 

June 2018, Updated | FHWA-SA-18-063
EDC-4 STEP: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/innovation/everydaycounts/edc_4/step.cfm 

Raised Crosswalk 

CONSIDERATIONS 

Raised crosswalks are typically installed on 

2-lane or 3-lane roads with speed limits of 

30 mph or less and annual average daily 

traffc (AADT) below about 9,000. Raised 

crossings should generally be avoided on 

truck routes, emergency routes, and arterial 

streets. 

Drainage can be an issue. Raised 

crosswalks may be installed with curb 

extensions where parking exists. They may 

also be used at intersections, particularly at 

the entrance of the minor street. 

Since this countermeasure can cause 

discomfort and noise (especially with larger 

vehicles), it may be appropriate to get 

public buy-in. Raised crosswalks may not be 

appropriate for bus transit routes or primary 

emergency vehicle routes. For States that 

experience regular snowfall, snowplowing 

can be a concern. 

COST 

The cost associated with a raised crosswalk 

ranges from $7,110 to $30,880 each, with 

the average cost estimated at $8,170. 

References 

Federal Highway Administration. (2013). “Raised Pedestrian Crossings” in PEDSAFE: Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System. 

Available: http://www.pedbikesafe.org/PEDSAFE/countermeasures_detail.cfm?CM_NUM=7 

Thomas, L., Thirsk, N. J., & Zegeer, C. (2016). NCHRP Synthesis 498: Application of Pedestrian Crossing Treatments for Streets and Highways. Transportation Research Board, 

Washington D.C. 

Bushell, M., Poole, B., Zegeer, C., & Rodriguez, D. (2013). Costs for Pedestrian and Bicyclist Infrastructure Improvements: A Resource for Researchers, Engineers, Planners, and 

the General Public. Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center. 

Elvik, R., Christensen, P., and Amundsen, A. (2004). "Speed and Road Accidents An Evaluation of the Power Model." Transportokonomisk Institutt, Oslo, Norway.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 13-702 

________________________________________________________________________ 

CUSTOMS 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and BAHRAIN 

Signed at Washington November 5, 2010 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 BAHRAIN 

 Customs 

 Agreement signed at Washington 

 November 5, 2010; 

 Entered into force July 2, 2013.
No. 00-7087.

#### Walker *v.*Terhune, Director, California Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
June 22, 1999



John W. Henry & Company, Inc.
One Glendinning Place
Westport, Ct. 06880
Attn: Ms. Beth Kenton


         Re:      Management Agreement Renewal
                  Smith Barney Principal Plus Futures Fund L.P.

Dear Ms. Kenton:

We are  writing  with  respect  to  your  management  agreement  concerning  the
commodity pool to which reference is made above (the "Management Agreement"). We
are extending the term of the Management Agreement through June 30, 2000 and all
other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged.

Please  acknowledge  receipt of this  modification  by signing  one copy of this
letter and returning it to the  attention of Mr. Daniel  Dantuono at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5416.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT INC.



By:
         Daniel A. Dantuono
         Chief Financial Officer,
         Director & Treasurer

RECEIVED

JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY, INC.

By:

Print Name:

DAD/sr