alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAHRID JOSEF BURGESS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 575 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of May, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
S. 3222 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four 

An Act 

To ensure the security of office space rented by Senators, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SECURITY OF OFFICE SPACE RENTED BY SENATORS. 

Section 3 of the Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1975 

(2 U.S.C. 6317) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (b)— 

(A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (12) as 

subparagraphs (A) through (L), respectively; 

(B) by striking ‘‘The aggregate’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the aggregate’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(2) The aggregate square feet of office space for purposes 

of paragraph (1) shall not include any portion of the office space 

used for security or safety enhancements that are— 

‘‘(A) of a kind authorized by the Committee on Rules and 

Administration of the Senate, which shall include an information technology security closet and a secure lobby or reception 

area; and 

‘‘(B) approved by the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper 

of the Senate.’’; and 

(2) in subsection (c)(1)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘The maximum’’ and inserting ‘‘(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), the maximum’’; and 

(B) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(B) The portion of the cost of a rental described in subparagraph (A) that is attributable to building security and safety measures shall not be included in determining the annual rate paid 

for the rental for purposes of subparagraph (A) if— 

‘‘(i) the costs are for building security and safety measures— 

‘‘(I) of a kind authorized by the Committee on Rules 

and Administration of the Senate, which shall include 

guard services, access control, and facility monitoring; and 
S. 3222—2 

‘‘(II) approved by the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper 

of the Senate; and 

‘‘(ii) such costs are itemized separately in a manner 

approved by the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the 

Senate.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<Page>

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors of
MTM Technologies, Inc. (formerly, Micros-to-Mainframes, Inc.):

We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(No. 333-72269) on Form S-8 and Registration Statement (No. 333-49718) on Form
S-3 of Micros-to-Mainframes, Inc. of our Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm, dated May 21, 2004, related to the consolidated balance
sheets of MTM Technologies, Inc. (formerly, Micros-to-Mainframes, Inc.) and
subsidiaries as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended March 31, 2004, which report appears in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of MTM Technologies, Inc. for the year ended March
31, 2004.


/s/ Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP
GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP
New York, New York
June 29, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53797-53798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27409]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Manzanar National Historic Site Advisory Commission; Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act that a meeting of the Manzanar National Historic Site 
Advisory Commission will be held at 1 p.m. on Saturday, October 25, 
1997, at the Inyo County Administrative Center, Board of Supervisors' 
Chambers, 224 N. Edwards Street (U.S. Highway 395), Independence, 
California, to hear presentations on issues related to the planning, 
development, and management of Manzanar National Historic Site.
    The Advisory Commission was established by Pub. L. 102-248, to meet 
and consult with the Secretary of the Interior or his designee, with 
respect to the development, management, and interpretation of the site, 
including the preparation of a general management plan for the Manzanar 
National Historic Site. Members of the Commission are as follows:

Ms. Sue Kunitomi Embrey, Chairperson
Mr. William Michael, Vice Chairperson
Mr. Keith Bright
Ms. Martha Davis
Mr. Ronald Izumita
Mr. Gann Matsuda
Mr. Vernon Miller
Mr. Mas Okui
Mr. Glenn Singley
Mr. Richard Stewart

    The main agenda items at this meeting of the Commission will 
include the following:
    (1) Status report on the development of Manzanar National Historic 
Site by Superintendent Ross R. Hopkins.
    (2) General discussion of miscellaneous matters pertaining to 
future Commission activities and Manzanar National Historic Site 
development issues.
    (3) Public comment period.
    This meeting is open to the public. It will be recorded for 
documentation and transcribed for dissemination. Minutes of the meeting 
will be available to the

[[Page 53798]]

public after approval of the full Commission. A transcript will be 
available after November 30, 1997. For a copy of the minutes, contact 
the Superintendent, Manzanar National Historic Site, P.O. Box 426, 
Independence, California 93526.

    Dated: September 25, 1997.
Ross R. Hopkins,
Superintendent, Manzanar National Historic Site.
[FR Doc. 97-27409 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Attachment 2

Proposed Information Collection Request for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines

EPA/OW/EAD Outreach Teleconference Industry Call-In Participant List

November 16, 2009List of Stakeholders Registered for the Outreach Call with Industry on November 16, 2009

AES Corporation Alliant Energy Ameren Corporation

American Electric Power Arizona Public Service Company Con Edison Company of New York Conectiv Energy Constellation Energy Consumers Energy CPS Energy Dayton Power & Light Co. Dominion Energy. Dominion Resources, Inc. Duke Energy Duke Energy

E.ON U.S.

Edison Electric Institute

Electric Power Research Institute Exelon Generation Company Florida Power & Light Company Hamilton Engineering, Inc. Kinder Morgan Power

Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. NRG Energy Otter Tail Power Company

PNM Resources PPL Corporation Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. Public Service Company of New Mexico Public Service of New Hampshire RRI Energy Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc. Southern Company Tampa Electric Company Tennessee Valley Authority Utility Water Act Group

Vectren Wabash Valley Power Association Wisconsin Electric Power Company (We Energies) Xcel Energy
SERVED: APRIL 24, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

NU FASHION BEAUTY SUPPLY DISTRIBUTORS 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

fDMS No. FAA-2011-1123 

ORDER LIMITING PROCEEDING TOJSSUE.OF PENALTY 

2LI 

The Federal Aviation Administration (''Complainant") filed a Motion for 

Summary Judgment or Judgment on the Pleadings ("Motion") dated March2.2} 2012, 

which, following the undersigned's Order to Show Cause of Aprilll, 2012 was 

addressed by Respondent Nu Fashion Beauty Supply Distributors ("Respondent"). 

Respondent's answer of April23, 2012 states that it does not contest Complainant's 

proposed findings that it committed each of the seven violations with which it has been 

charged. Respondent does, however, oppose Complainant's additional request that the 

proposed civil penalty of $15,000 be adopted. Respondent endorses Complainant's 

alternative request for reliefthat the hearing(set to begin on June 19) be limited to the 

question of the appropriate civil penalty amount. 

Respondent's proposal is adopted. Summary judgment will be granted as to the 

substantive allegations. I find, however, that genuine issues of material fact exist 

respecting the appropriate civil penalty aniount and, as such, judgment on that question as 

a matter of law may not be granted. 
2 

WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1- Complainant's Motion for Summary Judgment or for Judgment on the Pleadings is 

GRANTED as to the substantive allegations ofthe Complaint, and DENIED as to 

the issue of civil penalty; 

2 - The Order to Show Cause is VACATED; 

3- The proceeding will be limited to the issue of civil penalty. 

fl·ct.J c ' Q<j)Q~:__ ()~ Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Ms. Gayle Chyu 

Nu Fashion Beauty Supply Distributors, Respondent 

1366 Kingsland Avenue 

St. Louis, MO 63133 

W. Beavis Schock, Respondent's Counsel 

7777 Bonhomme Avenue, Suite 1300 

St. Louis, MO 63105 

TEL: 314-726-2322 

FAJ{: 314-721-1698 

Gayle E. Townsend, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel 

Central Region, ACE-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

DOT Building 

901 Locust, Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3766 

FAJ{: 816-329;.3771 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

. 202,366-5121 Staff Assistant FAJ{: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-1123 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                             13,512
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      17,430
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        0
<PP&E>                          1,134,349
<DEPRECIATION>                    347,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    869,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   0
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                            25 
<COMMON>                              277
<OTHER-SE>                        149,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      869,288
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  146,748
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      90,262
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    5,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 45,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     7,213
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 7,213
<DISCONTINUED>                          0     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   (22,512)
<CHANGES>                          (1,703)
<NET-INCOME>                       (8,639)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.85)
        

</TABLE>
Considering safety at every phase of the transportation process is a key 

component in the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) approach 

to reducing fatalities and serious injuries on our Nation’s roadways. This 

new resource guide shows planners and safety professionals how to work 

together to link the transportation planning and safety planning processes 

to address safety challenges. In order for planners and safety practitioners 

to communicate, they must first understand each other’s work. The guide, 

intended to be used by safety and planning professionals at Federal, State, 

Local, and Tribal agencies, is presented in three modules. 

Module 1 introduces safety and the safety planning process to 

transportation planners. 

Module 2 introduces the transportation planning process to safety 

specialists. 

Module 3 presents strategies and practices to integrate the safety and 

transportation planning processes. It also provides actionable steps for 

safety specialists and transportation planners, as well as the broader 

community of transportation practitioners. 

The guide will be available by early 2017 at http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/tsp/. 

For more information, please contact: 

Chimai Ngo 

FHWA Office of Safety 

Strategies to Enhance 

Communication, Collaboration, 

and Coordination between 

the Safety and Transportation 

Planning Processes 

(202) 366-1231
	

chimai.ngo@dot.gov 

1. Use committees and groups 

to expand multidisciplinary 

communication and collaboration. 

2. Share data and analyses to 

support the integration of 

transportation safety factors into 

the planning process. 

3. Coordinate long-range, 

metropolitan, regional, and local 

transportation planning. 

4. Integrate safety into 

transportation planning 

processes. 

5. Develop education and training 

programs on safety and planning. 

http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov

FHWA-SA-16-116
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BRIAN COHEN, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 06-181 Erie

v. )

)

PBPP, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was received by the Clerk of

Court on August 23, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan

Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act,

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 4], filed on

August 24, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s motion be denied and that the case be

dismissed without prejudice. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of

service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on

Respondents. Petitioner was granted an extension of time until September 18, 2006 to

file objections [Doc. No. 5]. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the

motion and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the

following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 4] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on August 24, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:06-cv-00181-SJM-SPB Document 6 Filed 09/19/06 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0157

STATE OF MONTANA

CHRISTINE L. MULGREW

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 and 

THOMAS D. MULGREW

 

 Respondent and Appellant

ORDER

Upon consideration of Petitioner and Appellee’s motion for extension of 

time, and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner and Appellee is granted an 

extension of time to and including September 9, 2020, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve her opening brief on appeal.

 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 10 2020

08/10/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0157
#### MACK TRUCKS, INC. v. Harry M. EDGE, d/b/a Reliable Truck Service, et al.

No. 8373.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Oct. 12, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 13, 1977.

Writ Refused Jan. 30, 1978.

Floyd J. Reed, Reed, Reed & D’Antonio, Metairie, for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard G. Steiner, Gretna, for defendant-appellee.

Before REDMANN, GULOTTA and STOULIG, JJ.

REDMANN, Judge.

The uncontradicted testimony and a “release” signed by the agent of Mack Financial Corporation (a corporate relation of plaintiff) and by defendant shows that the two mortgaged trucks were returned to plaintiff (through the financial corporation’s agent) about two months prior to their judicial seizure by plaintiff. Also un-contradicted is defendant’s and another witness’s testimony that the financial corporation’s agent promised that defendant would be released from further liability upon returning the trucks. We would therefore find plaintiff estopped from collecting the balance due, for the reasons of *Int. Harv. Cred. Corp. v. Am. Troubleshooters, Inc.,*La.App. 4 Cir. 1976, 338 So.2d 708.

Plaintiff further argues, however, that the Motor Vehicle Certificate of Title law, at La.R.S. 32:705, requires transfer of a vehicle only by assignment on the reverse of the certificate of title, and therefore defendant cannot have effected a giving of the trucks in payment of the debt. We tend to agree; but giving in payment is not the theory of *Int. Harv., supra.*

Affirmed.

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

On plaintiff’s request, for any reviewing court, we note that the printed *710document titled “RELEASE”, cited by us as showing the time that the trucks were returned to plaintiff, did not purport to release defendant’s liability.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OR GE I B AR R A L OP E Z ; F L OR E NT I NA I B AR R A, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 73481 A ge nc yN os . A 079- 536- 171

A 079- 539- 120 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary11, 2013 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , T A S H IM A , an dW A R D L A W , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J or ge I barr aL ope z and F l or e nt i naI barr a , na t i ve s and c i t i z e ns of M e xi c o, pet i t i on pro se f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order d e n y in g th e irm o tio n to r e o p e n . W e h av e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e 

# FI LED FEB 14 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 73481 2 r e v ie w f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , Sin gh v . I NS , 295 F . 3 d1 0 3 7 , 1 0 3 9 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 2 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to re o p en as u n ti m ely b ec au se th e m o ti o n w as filedo v erth re e y ea rs af ter th e B IA ’s f in a l d e c is io n , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2), and they f ai l ed t o p re se ntm at er i al evi dence of changed ci rc um st ance s i n M exi co t o q ual i fyfor the re gu l at ory e x c e p tio n to th e tim e lim ita tio n f o rf ilin g m o tio n s to r e o p e n , se e 8 C. F. R. § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; see a l so T ou f i gh iv. Mukasey , 538 F . 3d 988, 996 ( 9th C i r . 2008) (r equi ri ng m ov antt o p rodu ce m at er i alevi dence w i th m ot i on t o reopen that cond i t i on s i n cou ntryof nat i on al i ty had changed). I n l i ghtof

ourdi s pos i t i on, w e do notr e a c h pe t i t i one r s ’ r e m a i ni ng c o n te n tio n s r e g ar d in g th e irp r im af a c ie e lig ib ilityf

o rr e lie f . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
This page last reviewed May 21, 2014

Cap-and-Trade Program

This website provides information 

about California’s Cap-and-Trade 

Program that took effect in early 

2012. The enforceable compliance

obligation began on January 1, 

2013, for greenhouse gas (GHG) 

emissions. 

CITSS User Mobile Device Friendly Calendar View

Registration and 

Account Setup

Auctions and Reserve 

Sales Information

Allowance Allocation

Auction Proceeds 

Investment Plan

Compliance Offset 

Program

Market Monitoring WCI Linkage

Compliance Offset 

Protocol Review 

Process

Adaptive Management 

Plan

Voluntary Renewable 

Electricity Program

Program Implementation Activities:

Regulation, Guidance, Market 

Information, Forms, FAQs & Meetings

Current Regulation and Proposed Regulatory 

Amendments:

Guidance Documents:

Publicly Available Market Information:

Download Forms:

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs), Fact 

Sheets and Policy Statements:

May

30

Jun

2

Jun

3

View Full Calendar

Reserve Sale 

Notice Posted (for 

June 2014 

Reserve Sale)

Reporting deadline 

for submitting 

Electric Power 

Entity reports (for 2013 

data)

ARB Updates the 

Voluntary 

Renewable 

Electricity Website

What's New?

Auction 7 May 

2014 Summary 

Results Report is 

Posted

Electrical

Distribution Utility 

Upcoming Events

1 2 3 4 5

Categories

Cap-and-Trade Program | California Air Resources Board Page 1 of 2

http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/capandtrade.htm 5/29/2014
Information about...

Background Information

What is Cap-and-Trade?

Public Workshops, Training Webinars and 

Advisory Groups:

For regulation or program questionscontact the Cap-andTrade Hotline at (916) 322-2037

News or Press inquiries should be directed to ARB's Public 

Information Office at (916) 322-2990

Climate Change Programs

Use of Allowance 

Value Form 

is Posted

May 2014 Auction 

Notice is Posted

March 17, 2014 

Workshop -

Proposed Rice 

Cultivation Offset 

Protocol

2014 Annual 

Auction Reserve 

Price Notice is 

Posted

2014 Vintage 

Industrial 

Allocation

2014 Auction and 

Reserve Sale 

Activities 

Summary of 

Expected Dates

More...

Resources

Informal Public 

Comments

Board Resolutions

Join Email List

Contact Us

Live Webcasts

Registration

Process Flow 

Chart 

Cap-and-Trade Program | California Air Resources Board Page 2 of 2

http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/capandtrade.htm 5/29/2014
#### Billie Jeanne JOHNSTON, Appellant, v. Marcus JOHNSTON, Appellee.

No. O-138.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 3, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.