alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1997 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, 1997 AND 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,239
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,272
<PP&E>                                         666,090
<DEPRECIATION>                                 248,411
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 432,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,483
<BONDS>                                        385,299
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           158
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,450
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   432,384
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,890
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,744
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,903
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,243
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,250
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,250
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0120

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DALE NEWBURY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 1, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 26 2021

07/26/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0120
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47805-47806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24074]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP91-203-066]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

September 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 
(Tennessee) tendered for filing the following Revised Tariff Sheets to 
its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, to become effective 
September 1, 1997:

Twenty-Third Revised Sheet No. 22
Twentieth Revised Sheet No. 24

    Tennessee states that the purpose of the filing is to implement a 
100% load factor rate design for its Interruptible Transportation (IT) 
rates in compliance

[[Page 47806]]

with Commission Opinion Nos. 406 and 406-A and the Stipulation and 
Agreement filed June 2, 1993, in Docket No. RP91-203, et al.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests must be filed in accordance 
with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24074 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Gerald WEINER and Marilyn Weiner, d/b/a Southern Food & Vending Service, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation, Appellee.

No. 77-1104.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 2, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 28, 1978.

Robert S. Korschun, Miami, for appellants.

Knight, Peters, Pickle, Niemoeller & Flynn, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and CRAWFORD, GRADY L. (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in *Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Cartmel,*87 Fla. 495, 100 So. 802 (1924); and *United States Fire Insurance Company v. Morejon,*338 So.2d 223, 225 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).
# Eiropas Savienības C 168I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 168I |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 64. gadagājums2021. gada 5. maijs |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 168I

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

64. gadagājums2021. gada 5. maijs

---

| Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Informācija |
| | KOPĪGĀS DEKLARĀCIJAS |
| | Eiropas ParlamentsPadome |
| 2021/C 168 I/01 | Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes kopīga deklarācija par Savienības vērtību sadaļas finansēšanu 2021. gadā | 1 |

Saturs

Lappuse

II   Informācija

KOPĪGĀS DEKLARĀCIJAS

Eiropas ParlamentsPadome

2021/C 168 I/01

Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes kopīga deklarācija par Savienības vērtību sadaļas finansēšanu 2021. gadā

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

II Informācija

KOPĪGĀS DEKLARĀCIJAS

Eiropas Parlaments Padome

| 5.5.2021 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CI 168/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2021

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CI 168/1

---

Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes kopīga deklarācija par Savienības vērtību sadaļas finansēšanu 2021. gadā

(2021/C 168 I/01)

Neskarot budžeta lēmējinstitūcijas pilnvaras, likumdevējiestādes ir vienisprātis, ka programmas “Pilsoņi, vienlīdzība, tiesības un vērtības” Savienības vērtību sadaļa būtu jānodrošina ar būtisku finansējumu no 2021. gada 1. janvāra.

Likumdevējiestādes aicina Komisiju veikt pienācīgus pasākumus, lai sasniegtu minēto mērķi, jo īpaši izvērtēt elastības instrumentu lietošanu ES 2021. gada budžeta tiesiskā regulējuma ietvaros saskaņā ar DFS regulā noteiktajiem aktivizēšanas kritērijiem.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26995]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[WO-310-1310-01-24 1A]


OMB Approval Number 1004-0135; Information Collection Submitted 
to the Office of Management and Budget for Review Under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act

    The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has submitted the proposed 
collection of information listed below has been submitted to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 3501 et seq.) On March 28, 
1996, the BLM published a notice in the Federal Register (61 FR 13869) 
requesting comments on the collection. The comment period ended May 28, 
1996. No comments were received. Copies of the proposed collection of 
information and related forms and explanatory material may be obtained 
by contacting the BLM Clearance Officer at the telephone number listed 
below.
    OMB is required to respond to this request within 60 days but may 
respond after 30 days. For maximum consideration your comments and 
suggestions on the requirement should be made within 30 days directly 
to the Office of Management and Budget, Interior Department Desk 
Officer (1004-0135), Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Washington, D.C. 20503, telephone (202) 395-7340. Please provide a copy 
of your comments to the Bureau Clearance Officer (WO-630), 1849 C St., 
N.W., Mail Stop 401 LS, Washington, D.C. 20240.

Nature of Comments

    We specifically request your comments on the following:
    1. Whether the collection of information is necessary for the 
proper functioning of the Bureau of Land Management, including whether 
the information will have practical utility;
    2. The accuracy of BLM's estimate of the burden of collecting the 
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions 
used;
    3. The quality, utility and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and
    4. How to minimize the burden of collecting the information on 
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated 
electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology.

    Title: Sundry Notices and Reports on Wells.
    OMB Approval Number: 1004-0135.
    Abstract: Data submitted by oil and gas operators is used for 
agency approval of specific additional operations on a well and to 
report the completion of such additional work.
    Bureau Form Number: 3160-5.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Description of Respondents: Operators and operating rights owners 
of Federal and Indian (except Osage) oil and gas leases.
    Estimated completion time: 25 minutes.
    Annual Responses: 34,000.
    Annual Burden Hours: 14, 166.
    Bureau Clearance Officer: Carole Smith, (202) 452-0367.


    Dated: October 7, 1997.
Carole Smith,
Bureau of Land Management Information Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26995 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-M
#### Thomas DUGGER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1284.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1977.

*741Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NATHAN and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appealing from conviction of conspiracy to sell a controlled substance and sale and delivery of a controlled substance, the defendant-appellant presents two points. In one, appellant contends the court committed error by permitting an assigned state attorney through his assistant to prosecute the defendant when the period of assignment had expired. Secondly, appellant contends the court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the information as amended for insufficiency and for the asserted ground that the assistant state attorney who signed the information was not legally qualified to do so. Those contentions have been considered in the light of the record, briefs and argument, and we hold that no reversible error has been shown.

Regarding the first contention, there were extensions, made by the Supreme Court, of the Executive Order by which the State Attorney for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit had been assigned to prosecute this and other interrelated cases in the Sixteenth Judicial Circuit. The fact that there was a gap of approximately one week between the end of one extension period and the time of the further extension by the Supreme Court did not operate to vitiate the prosecution, or the proceedings thereon which took place in the interval. *In re Executive Assignment of State Attorney,*298 So.2d 382 (Fla.1974); *Austin v. State ex rel. Christian,*310 So.2d 289 (Fla.1975). There was no timely challenge of the authority or power of the state attorney then conducting the prosecution, to so proceed. Such challenge, if made, would need to have been presented by quo warranto. *Hart v. State,*144 Fla. 409, 198 So. 120 (1940); *Carey v. State,*349 So.2d 820 (Fla.3d DCA 1977, opinion filed September 13, 1977).

As to the appellant’s second point, it was shown that the assistant state attorney, who was of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, who signed the information had been sworn as an assistant state attorney for the Sixteenth Judicial Circuit in the matters, of which this was one, for the prosecution of which the State Attorney of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit was assigned and directed to conduct such prosecution, by Executive Order. Denial of defendant’s motion to dismiss the information as amended was not error.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.3

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-62787), in
the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-03107) and in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-57083, 33-57077, 33-57081, 33-64553,
333-10389, 333-17891, and 333-36339) of AirTouch Communications, Inc. of our
report dated February 16, 1998 relating to the financial statements of
Mannesmann Mobilfunk GmbH, which appears in AirTouch Communications Inc.'s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.


Dusseldorf, Germany, March 19, 1998

KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft
Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft

/s/ Scheffler                     /s/ Haas
Wirtschaftsprufer                 Wirtschaftsprufer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH 

SCIENCES CENTER AT EL PASO,

 Appellant,

v.

LYDIA VEGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF 

THE ESTATE OF SIRIA BOJORQUEZ, 

AND ALL WRONGFUL DEATH 

BENEFICIARIES AND AS NEXT 

FRIEND OF ISABEL BOJORQUEZ,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

§

No. 08-12-00373-CV

Appeal from the

327th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2006-809)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the agreed motion to dismiss appeal, and 

concludes the motion should be granted. We therefore set aside the trial court’s order denying 

Appellant’s plea to the jurisdiction, and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of 

judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. We further order costs on appeal shall be 

taxed in accordance with the parties’ agreement, and this decision be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
109 STAT. 794 PUBLIC LAW 104–80—DEC. 28, 1995

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2547 (S. 1388):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–417 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):

Dec. 18, considered and passed House.

Dec. 20, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–80

104th Congress

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse located at 800 Market Street in Knoxville,

Tennessee, as the ‘‘Howard H. Baker, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States courthouse located at 800 Market Street

in Knoxville, Tennessee, shall be known and designated as the

‘‘Howard H. Baker, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the

‘‘Howard H. Baker, Jr. United States Courthouse’’.

Approved December 28, 1995.

Dec. 28, 1995

[H.R. 2547]
<TABLE>

COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE INCOME
<CAPTION>
                                                                                            Year Ended December 31,
                                                              -----------------------------------------------------
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)                       1996                1995                1994
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                           <C>                 <C>                 <C>      
Average shares outstanding                                        6,538,279           6,525,042           4,911,485

Net effect of dilutive stock options-
based on the treasury stock method using average
market price                                                         19,710              42,024              52,049
                                                              -----------------------------------------------------

Total                                                             6,557,989           6,567,066           4,963,534
                                                              -----------------------------------------------------

Net income                                                    $       3,914       $       1,646      $        3,531
                                                              =====================================================

Per share amount                                              $         .60       $         .25      $          .71
                                                              =====================================================

</TABLE>
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

39–011 2013

113th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 113–68 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1002(b) OF 

THE CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2014 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1002(b) OF THE 

CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2014 

OCTOBER 22, 2013.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means and ordered to be printed 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with REPORTSE:\Seals\Congress.#13

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, October 17, 2013. 

Hon. JOHN BOEHNER, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Pursuant to section 1002(b) of the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014, I hereby certify that absent a 

suspension of the limit under section 3101(b) of title 31, United 

States Code, the Secretary of the Treasury would be unable to 

issue debt to meet existing commitments. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
**MFS Overview Video Script**

**YouTube Information:**

Title: Virtual Hydraulics Lab Tour – Multifunctional Flume System

Description: An introduction to the Multifunctional Flume System (MFS) used in the TFHRC’s Hydraulics Laboratory to conduct physical experiments.

**Script:**

This is the Multifunctional Flume System, also known as the MFS, where physical experiments are conducted to calibrate computer and CFD models. The tiltable MFS is equipped with adjustable channel elements mounted on the flume platform. If needed, channel elements can be removed to conduct drainage or culvert hydraulics experiments. Different flow conditions are generated to study the hydraulic response of the 3D-printed, scaled models. Movable bed experiments allow the investigation of scour around scaled bridge foundations and are used to validate the CFD scour research.

**508 Caption Description:**

The video begins with the camera panning up the stairs to reach the catwalk level of the flume, first focusing on the inlet tank and then slowly rotating around to view the entire channel section. The main video shrinks and a second video appears showing an experiment in the main channel. A 3D-printed bridge deck with a single pier is mounted in a dry channel, before water enters the channel creating flow effects from the pier’s shape. A new experiment appears, showing a different 3D-printed bridge and pier model mounted in sandy bed material. A final video shows a robot arm sculpting an angled embankment out of sand along the channel.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of EnergyConnect Group, Inc. (the Company) for the twelve months ended January 1, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Covered Report), I, the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of this 1st day
of April 2011.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ Kevin R. Evans                    
|Kevin R. Evans Chief Executive Officer