alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RUSSELL WINSTON, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 04-68 Erie

v. )

)

COMMONWEALTH OF )

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF )

PROBATION AND PAROLE, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This petition for writ of habeas corpus was transferred from the United States

District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania and received by the Clerk of Court

on March 3, 2004 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise

Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on July 22, 2005,

recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed, that a certificate

of appealability be denied, and that Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. No.

23] be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file

objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail at SCI Albion, where he is

incarcerated, and on Respondent. Petitioner has filed no objections to Magistrate

Judge Baxter’s Report and Recommendation. After de novo review of the petition and

documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following

order is entered:

AND NOW, this 11th day of August 2005;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is 

DISMISSED and that a certificate of appealability be denied. IT IS FURTHER

Case 1:04-cv-00068-SJM-SPB Document 27 Filed 08/11/05 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 23] is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on

July 22, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:04-cv-00068-SJM-SPB Document 27 Filed 08/11/05 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00035-MBC-SPB   Document 5   Filed 05/09/06   Page 1 of 1
No. 00-7009.

#### Norelli *v.*Clarke, Warden.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Case 1:05-cv-00114-MBC-SPB   Document 25   Filed 02/01/06   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:05-cv-00114-MBC-SPB   Document 25   Filed 02/01/06   Page 2 of 2

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2014-03-11T14:29:41-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
RECEIVED 

SERVED JANUARY 8,2011 w fc-fc^ 

JAN I k 2 m 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATZQafc A Oi^i ^ r>^^., . 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS " t ARING DOCKET 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

APPLICATION OF 

RECURRENT TRAINING CENTER, INC. 

For fees aood expones under tfie 

Equal Access to Justice Act 

S2 

-.C/3 l O 

FAA DOCKET NO. (CPIOGLOOIO) 

(Civil Penalty Actiwi) Q 5^:§ ^ 

FDMSNO.(FAA-201(M)973) Ji ^ ^ 

en 

NOTICE OF APPLICANT*S APPEAL 

COMES NOW Applicant, RECURRENT TRAINING CENTER, INC., by and through 

its counsel, BARNETT LAW OFFICES, P.C., pursuant to 14 CF.R. §14.28 and 14 C.F.R. 

§13.233 and hereby appeals the INITIAL DECISION DENYING APPLICATION FOR 

ATTQRNEY*S FEES AND OraER EXPENSES dated January 3,2011. Applicant prays that 

the decision be reversed. 

Respectfully submitted. 

'Attorney for Appi 

Recurrent Training Center, Inc. 
Charles R. Bamett, III 

BARNETT LAW OFFICES, P.C. 

1664 Moorland Lane 

Crystal Lake, lUinois 60014-2985 

(815)356-8647 

(815) 356-7042 (FAX) 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Notice of Applicant's Appeal was served via 

US Certified Mail, return receipt requested as follows: 

ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attenttcm: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

WiUwr Wii ^ Boikling—Suite 2W1000 

FAX: 202-493-5142 

ONE COPY 

Briana Martino, Conqjkmumt's Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7M 

Federal Aviation Administrstion 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 

TEL: 847-294-7713 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Ju^ e 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Chround Floor 

Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attomey-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Dated this 8*^ day of January 2011 

les^LBa 

Attorney for Respondent
```

[House Document 113-59]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

113th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 113-59

 
    CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN 
                           TERRORIST ATTACKS

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

   NOTIFICATION THAT THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN 
  TERRORIST ATTACKS IS TO CONTINUE FOR ONE YEAR BEYOND SEPTEMBER 14, 
                  2013, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1622(d)

 September 11, 2013.--Message and accompanying papers referred to the 
         Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered to be printed
To the Congress of the United States:
    Section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 
1622(d), provides for the automatic termination of a national 
emergency unless, within 90 days prior to the anniversary date 
of its declaration, the President publishes in the Federal 
Register and transmits to the Congress a notice stating that 
the emergency is to continue in effect beyond the anniversary 
date. Consistent with this provision, I have sent to the 
Federal Register the enclosed notice, stating that the 
emergency declared in Proclamation 7463 with respect to the 
terrorist attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001, 
is to continue in effect for an additional year.
    The terrorist threat that led to the declaration on 
September 14, 2001, of a national emergency continues. For this 
reason, I have determined that it is necessary to continue in 
effect after September 14, 2013, the national emergency with 
respect to the terrorist threat.

                                                      Barack Obama.
    The White House, September 10, 2013.
                                 Notice

                              ----------                              

    Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Certain 
                           Terrorist Attacks

    Consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies 
Act, 50 U.S.C. 1622(d), I am continuing for 1 year the national 
emergency previously declared on September 14, 2001, in 
Proclamation 7463, with respect to the terrorist attacks of 
September 11, 2001, and the continuing and immediate threat of 
further attacks on the United States.
    Because the terrorist threat continues, the national 
emergency declared on September 14, 2001, and the powers and 
authorities adopted to deal with that emergency must continue 
in effect beyond September 14, 2013. Therefore, I am continuing 
in effect for an additional year the national emergency that 
was declared on September 14, 2001, with respect to the 
terrorist threat.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and 
transmitted to the Congress.
                                                      Barack Obama.
    The White House, September 10, 2013.

                                  

```
#### Alden J. RICHTER, Donald A. Kellogg and Richter & Kellogg, Inc., Petitioners, v. Cornelius L. REAGAN and Florida Real Estate Commission, Respondents.

No. 69-780.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 20, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sense Technologies Inc. (the "Company")
  on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2003 as filed with
  the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 15, 2004, 2003 (the "Report"),
  the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
  certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

|Date: January 15, 2004 | By: | /s/ James H. Cotter                       
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     |                                           
|                       |     | James H. Cotter                           
|                       |     | President and Principal Accounting Officer

---
iihs.org

Safe system approach:

Vehicle countermeasures

USDOT Pedestrian Safety Summit

July 8, 2020

Jessica Cicchino, PhD

Vice President, Research, IIHS
Vehicle designs for pedestrian protection

Streamlined 

contour

Aggressive bumper styling 

contours

Recessed wiper 

mounts

Headlamps 

outside testing 

area 

Hood wraps around 

side of vehicle

Plastic hood 

release and 

recessed 

latch

Thermoplastic bumper

Crushable fender 

standoffs

Lower bumper support

Covered 

strut towers
Vehicle types in single-vehicle fatal pedestrian crashes 

2009–18

0

2009 2010 2011 2012

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

cars, +44%

SUVs, +93%

pickups, +40%

minivans/large 

vans, +2%

medium/heavy 

trucks, +34%
Headlights

GOOD: 2018 Hyundai Kona with 

LED projector headlights

POOR: 2018 Hyundai Kona with 

halogen projector headlights
Pedestrian automatic emergency braking

Percent change in pedestrian-related injury claim frequency, Subaru’s EyeSight

statistically significant

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

More 

claims

Fewer 

claims

20%

Impreza 4dr 4WD Impreza station

wagon 4WD

XV Crosstrek station

wagon 4WD

Forester 4dr 4WD Outback station

wagon 4WD

Legacy 4dr 4WD all vehicles
More information at iihs.org and on our social channels:

iihs.org

/iihs.org

@IIHS_autosafety

@iihs_autosafety

IIHS

Jessica Cicchino

jcicchino@iihs.org
#### Thomas Junior FLINT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-157.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Sept. 5, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
BG

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0454

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

GEORGE ISAAC CARLON,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and

including March 1, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 28 2021

12/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0454
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT, BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW,
STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER EQUITY AND RELATED NOTES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,630
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  171,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,560
<INVENTORY>                                    217,083
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               426,127
<PP&E>                                         158,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 891,274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          156,274
<BONDS>                                        536,534
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   891,274
<SALES>                                        906,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               911,113
<CGS>                                          700,980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               135,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,714
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,273
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,936)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,209
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,614)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,595
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 21
                                        
                           Matrix Capital Corporation

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


1.  Matrix Financial Services Corporation - Incorporated in Arizona

2.  United Financial, Inc. - Incorporated in Colorado

3.  Matrix Capital Bank - Organized pursuant to a Federal savings and loan
    charter

4.  United Special Services, Inc. - Incorporated in Colorado

5.  United Capital Markets, Inc. - Incorporated in Colorado

6.  The Vintage Group Inc. - Incorporated in Texas

7.  Vintage Delaware Holdings, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware

8.  Sterling Trust Company - Incorporated in Texas

9.  First Matrix Investment Services Corp. - Incorporated in Texas

10. Matrix Funding Corp. - Incorporated in Colorado

11. Matrix Advisory Services Corporation - Incorporated in Colorado

12. Equi-Mor Holdings, Inc. - Incorporated in Nevada

13. Matrix Aviation Corporation - Incorporated in Colorado

14. MCNP-1 Corp. - Incorporated in New Mexico

15. Leader Acquisition Corp. - Incorporated in Delaware

                                     II-3
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF SHILOH INDUSTRIES, INC.

The following is a list of the subsidiaries of Shiloh Industries, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"). The common stock of all the
corporations listed below is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by the
Corporation. If indented, the Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of the
corporation under which it is listed unless otherwise noted.

                                                             STATE OF
NAME OF CORPORATION                                        INCORPORATION
--------------------                                       -------------
Shiloh Corporation                                            Ohio
  The Sectional Die Company                                   Ohio
  Sectional Stamping, Inc.                                    Ohio
  Medina Blanking, Inc.(1)                                    Ohio
  Liverpool Coil Processing, Incorporated                     Ohio
  Shiloh of Michigan, LLC(2)                                  Michigan
  VCS Properties, LLC                                         Ohio
Greenfield Die & Manufacturing Corp.                          Michigan
Shiloh Incorporated                                           Michigan
C & H Design Company                                          Michigan
Jefferson Blanking Inc.                                       Georgia
Shiloh Automotive, Inc.                                       Ohio
Shiloh de Mexico S.A. de C.V.(3)                              Mexico
  Shiloh International S.A. de C.V.(4)                        Mexico
Shiloh Industries International Inc.                          Barbados
Shiloh Industries, Inc. Dickson Manufacturing Division        Tennessee
--------
(1) Medina Blanking, Inc. is 22% owned by the Corporation and 78% owned by
    Shiloh Corporation.
(2) Shiloh of Michigan is 80% owned by Shiloh Corporation and 20% owned by
    Shiloh Automotive, Inc.
(3) Shiloh de Mexico S.A. de C.V. is owned 99% by the Corporation and 1% by
    Medina Blanking, Inc.
(4) Shiloh International S.A. de C.V. is owned 98% by the Corporation and 2% by
    Shiloh de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5243-5244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2700]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[NV-050-1020-001]


Mojave-Southern Great Basin Resource Advisory Council--Notice of 
Meeting Locations and Times

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Resource Advisory Council meeting locations and times.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 5 U.S.C., the 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), council 
meeting of the Mojave-Southern Great Basin Resource Advisory Council 
(RAC) will be held as indicated below. The agenda includes a public 
comment period, and discussion of public land issues.
    The Resource Advisory Council develops recommendations for BLM 
regarding the preparation, amendment, and implementation of land use 
plans for the public lands and resources within the jurisdiction of the 
council. For the Mojave-Great Basin RAC this jurisdiction is Clark, 
Esmeralda, Lincoln and Nye counties in Nevada. Except for the purposes 
of long-range planning and the establishment of resource management 
priorities, the RAC shall not provide advice on the allocation and 
expenditure of Federal funds, or on personnel issues.
    The RAC may develop recommendation for implementation of ecosystem 
management concepts, principles and programs, and assist the BLM to 
establish landscape goals and objectives.
    All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written 
comments to the council. Public comments should be limited to issues 
for which the RAC may make recommendations within its area of 
jurisdiction. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment, 
and time available, the time for individual

[[Page 5244]]

oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need 
further information about the meetings, or need special assistance such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Michael Dwyer at the Las Vegas District Office, 4765 
Vegas Dr., Las Vegas, NV 89108, telephone, (702) 647-5000.

DATES, TIMES: Date is February 28, 1997, from 8:30 a.m. to 
approximately 4:30 p.m. The council will meet at the BLM Las Vegas 
District Office, located at 4765 Vegas Dr., Las Vegas, NV 89108. The 
public comment period will begin at 3 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lorraine Buck, Public Affairs Specialist, Las Vegas District, 
telephone: (702) 647-5000.

    Dated: January 23, 1997.
James W. Abbott,
Associate District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-2700 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2731]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-33,016]


Paramount Headwear Mountain Grove, Missouri; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, and investigation 
was initiated on December 16, 1996 in response to a worker petition 
which was filed October 17, 1996 on behalf of workers at Paramount 
Headwear, Mountain Grove, Missouri (TA-W-33,016).
    The petitioning group of workers are covered under an existing 
Trade Adjustment Assistance certification (TA-W-32,433G). Consequently, 
further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 23rd day of January 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-2731 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M