Wyoming

Highway Safety Improvement Program

2013 Annual Report

Prepared by: WY
ii

Disclaimer

Protection of Data from Discovery & Admission into Evidence

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section [HSIP], shall not be 

subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered 

for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or 

addressed in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data.” 

23 U.S.C. 409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, 

or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety 

enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway 

crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any 

highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid 

highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State 

court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any 

occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.”
iii

Table of Contents

Disclaimer...................................................................................................................................................... ii

Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................................1

Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................4

Program Structure ........................................................................................................................................4

Program Administration ...........................................................................................................................4

Program Methodology..............................................................................................................................6

Progress in Implementing Projects.............................................................................................................26

Funds Programmed............................................................................................................................. 26

General Listing of Projects.................................................................................................................. 29

Progress in Achieving Safety Performance Targets....................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Overview of General Safety Trends....................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Application of Special Rules................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Improvements (Program Evaluation) ..........................................70

SHSP Emphasis Areas............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

Groups of similar project types.............................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

Systemic Treatments ............................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

Glossary.......................................................................................................................................................93
iv
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

1

Executive Summary

The overall safety goal of WYDOT with respect to safety is to “Reduce the frequency and 

severity of crashes on the state’s roadways with the resources available.”

That essentially translates to getting the most reduction in crashes possible from the dollars 

spent in the name of safety.

The WYDOT Safety Management System is a collection of tools, business processes, crossprogram work flows, and the policy on Highway Safety designed to facilitate the identification 

and correction of safety concerns on the roadway network in Wyoming, and to achieve the 

overall safety goal.

Safety remedies – which range from geometric construction factors (such as shoulder width or 

super elevation) to roadside safety hardware (such as rumble strips or guard rails) to 

intersection traffic control (such as stop signs or signals) are managed as safety assets. The 

deployment of these safety assets is addressed through performance management principles 

that are described below. 

The Safety Management System supports WYDOT business objectives by helping to accomplish 

the following: 

• Optimize safety spending 

o WYDOT will achieve a higher level of safety improvement (reduction in 

frequency and/or severity of crashes) through the project work funded in the 

name of safety.

o WYDOT will be able to get the highest level of benefit of safety spending by 

being able to identify and focus on the projects that will provide the greatest 

reduction for the lowest cost. 

• Transparency 

o WYDOT will be able to provide solid, defensible rationale for decisions regarding 

safety investments, and be able to communicate clearly to the public, the federal 

partners, and state legislature with regards to safety efforts

o The prioritization of safety investments is in line with the WYDOT Balanced Score 

Card measures for safety, as well as with other associated plans (WYDOT 

Strategic Plan, the Strategic Highway Safety Plan, the Traffic Records Strategic 

Plan, etc...) 
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

2

o Focusing on fatal and incapacitating injury crashes (referred together as “critical 

crashes”), while also considering counts of all crashes

• Facilitate Cross-Program efforts 

o Interactions between various parties will be streamlined with smoother flow of 

information and actions between District management, Traffic Operations, 

Project Development, Planning, and Highway Patrol in addition to Highway 

Safety with regards to the development and deployment of safety remedies.

With the SMS at WYDOT, decision-makers have access to higher quality, more useful 

information on which to base their decisions, and with which to resist demands to adopt suboptimal positions.

• The result is higher-level information being available, rather than simply raw data. The 

intent is to provide “actionable intelligence” to the decision-makers.

• This information is available in a timely manner; before the decision needs to be made

• Pertinent and applicable to the types of decisions that are made at the various times 

and the various levels

• Presented in ways that make it easy to understand and communicate, making use of 

evolving display technologies (maps, graphing, stacked graphs, etc.)

A deeper level of focus of the SMS is to provide and support the use of helpful reports, 

repositories, and interactive tools that assist engineers in “peeling back the onion” to better 

understand what factors contribute to a particular high crash location.

• Providing an ensemble of information at ones fingertips, making use of integrated data 

sets and modern access and display technology. The standard Highway Safety Segment 

Report is an example, as are collision diagrams and stacked graphs.

• Helping to select the appropriate remedy (or remedies) for a location, given the types of 

crashes that are occurring, the geometries and layout of the location, and the types of 

remedies already in place

• Capturing and tracking candidate treatments through the lifecycle into deployment, to 

help ensure that the best treatments (in terms of benefit/cost) get deployed, and that 

the information about what was done where and when is available later for 

effectiveness studies.

• These tools are available for use by HWS analysts as well as by other engineers (District, 

Traffic Operations, etc.)

• Supporting interactive analysis tools to explore, understand, and compare crashes and 

remedies. Examples include CARE, the clickable map.
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

3

The overall safety goal for the Wyoming Department of Transportation with respect to highway 

safety is to "Reduce the frequency and severity of crashes on the state's roadways with the 

resources available"

This statement essentially translates to getting the most reduction in crashes possible from the 

dollars spent in the name of highway safety.
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

4

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program 

with the purpose of achieving a significant reduction in fatalities and serious 

injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 148(h) and 23 CFR 924.15, States are 

required to report annually on the progress being made to advance HSIP 

implementation and evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent 

with the HSIP MAP-21 Reporting Guidance dated February 13, 2013 and consists 

of four sections: program structure, progress in implementing HSIP projects, 

progress in achieving safety performance targets, and assessment of the 

effectiveness of the improvements. 

Program Structure

Program Administration

How are Highway Safety Improvement Program funds allocated in a State? 

Central

District

Other

If District, how are the HSIP funds allocated?

Formula

Crash Data

Population

Other Judgement based upon data and rating system used to ID specific projects for highway 

safety funding
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

5

The engineering staff of each District are involved in programming and implementing projects 

within the HSIP.

Describe how local roads are addressed as part of Highway Safety Improvement Program.

The local county roads are included in the HSIP by the Wyoming rural road safety program 

(WRRSP) administered by the UW LTAP center. The program reviews crash and roadway 

feature data to develop high risk road locations. The work done by the LTAP then includes 

assistance in putting projects together with the local jurisdictions to address the identified 

roadway safety needs.

There are two MPO's in Wyoming and they are represented on the Safety Mangagement 

Committee that identifies emphasis areas for the SHSP. Porjects are proposed and developed 

by the MPO's with regard to their own identified needs and assistance is provided in data and 

information.

Identify which internal partners are involved with Highway Safety Improvement Program planning. 

Design

Planning

Maintenance

Operations

Governors Highway Safety Office

Other: 

Briefly describe coordination with internal partners. 

Internal partners are asked to provide their expertise in the various areas that they represent.

The coordination is required at many levels based upon the policies of WYDOT. Information is 

developed and disemminated by the Highway Safety Office. The information is used to make 
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

6

decisions regarding project programming and design by the other WYDOT programs responsible

for that part of the project development and implementation.

Identify which external partners are involved with Highway Safety Improvement Program planning. 

Metropolitan Planning Organizations

Governors Highway Safety Office

Local Government Association

Other: 

Identify any program administration practices used to implement the HSIP that have changed since 

the last reporting period.

Multi-disciplinary HSIP steering committee

Other: Other-Safety Management System has been instituted and is beginning to be used.

Describe any other aspects of Highway Safety Improvement Program Administration on which you 

would like to elaborate.

None

Program Methodology

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP. 

Median Barrier Intersection Safe Corridor

Horizontal Curve Bicycle Safety Rural State Highways
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

7

Skid Hazard Crash Data Red Light Running Prevention

Roadway Departure Low-Cost Spot Improvements Sign Replacement And 

Improvement

Local Safety Pedestrian Safety Right Angle Crash

Left Turn Crash Shoulder Improvement Segments

Other: 

Program: Median Barrier

Date of Program Methodology: 10/9/2006

 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway

All crashes Traffic Median width

Fatal crashes only Volume Horizontal curvature

Fatal and serious injury 

crashes only

Population Functional classification

Other Lane miles Roadside features

Other Other 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency

Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

8

Equivalent property damage only (EPDO Crash frequency)

EPDO crash frequency with EB adjustment

Relative severity index

Crash rate

Critical rate

Level of service of safety (LOSS)

Excess expected crash frequency using SPFs

Excess expected crash frequency with the EB adjustment

Excess expected crash frequency using method of moments

Probability of specific crash types

Excess proportions of specific crash types

Other 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

No

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process

selection committee

Other-District and Traffic Operations input

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

9

Relative Weight in Scoring

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C

Available funding 1

Incremental B/C

Ranking based on net benefit

Cost Effectiveness

Program: Intersection

Date of Program Methodology: 10/9/2011

 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway

All crashes Traffic Median width

Fatal crashes only Volume Horizontal curvature

Fatal and serious injury 

crashes only

Population Functional classification

Other Lane miles Roadside features

Other Other-Rural Intersections and 

the type of traffic control 

present for example signalized or 

not

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

10

Crash frequency

Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

Equivalent property damage only (EPDO Crash frequency)

EPDO crash frequency with EB adjustment

Relative severity index

Crash rate

Critical rate

Level of service of safety (LOSS)

Excess expected crash frequency using SPFs

Excess expected crash frequency with the EB adjustment

Excess expected crash frequency using method of moments

Probability of specific crash types

Excess proportions of specific crash types

Other 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

No

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

No

If no, describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

Rural off sytem intersections are studied independently from on system intersections. Urban 

intersections are also studied within the community that they exist. A statewide program does not 

currently exist.
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

11

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process

selection committee

Other-Disrtict and Traffic operations input

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Relative Weight in Scoring

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C

Available funding 1

Incremental B/C

Ranking based on net benefit

Cost Effectiveness

Program: Horizontal Curve

Date of Program Methodology: 10/9/2009

 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway

All crashes Traffic Median width
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

12

Fatal crashes only Volume Horizontal curvature

Fatal and serious injury 

crashes only

Population Functional classification

Other Lane miles Roadside features

Other Other 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency

Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

Equivalent property damage only (EPDO Crash frequency)

EPDO crash frequency with EB adjustment

Relative severity index

Crash rate

Critical rate

Level of service of safety (LOSS)

Excess expected crash frequency using SPFs

Excess expected crash frequency with the EB adjustment

Excess expected crash frequency using method of moments

Probability of specific crash types

Excess proportions of specific crash types

Other 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

No
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

13

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process

selection committee

Other-Disrtict and Traffic operations input

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Relative Weight in Scoring

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C 2

Available funding 1

Incremental B/C

Ranking based on net benefit

Cost Effectiveness

Program: Crash Data

Date of Program Methodology: 10/9/2008

 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway

All crashes Traffic Median width
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

14

Fatal crashes only Volume Horizontal curvature

Fatal and serious injury 

crashes only

Population Functional classification

Other-Safety Index rating 

system

Lane miles Roadside features

Other Other 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency

Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

Equivalent property damage only (EPDO Crash frequency)

EPDO crash frequency with EB adjustment

Relative severity index

Crash rate

Critical rate

Level of service of safety (LOSS)

Excess expected crash frequency using SPFs

Excess expected crash frequency with the EB adjustment

Excess expected crash frequency using method of moments

Probability of specific crash types

Excess proportions of specific crash types

Other 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

No
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

15

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

No

If no, describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

Crash Data is tailored for the specific study that is being conducted for the other roadways whether they 

be rural counties or urban communities. The Wyoming rural road safety program is utilized for HRRR 

projects.

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process

selection committee

Other-Data improvement projects are developed and implemented by the WY traffic records 

coordinating committe

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Relative Weight in Scoring

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C

Available funding 1

Incremental B/C

Ranking based on net benefit

Cost Effectiveness 2
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

16

Program: Roadway Departure

Date of Program Methodology: 10/9/2006

 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway

All crashes Traffic Median width

Fatal crashes only Volume Horizontal curvature

Fatal and serious injury 

crashes only

Population Functional classification

Other Lane miles Roadside features

Other Other 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency

Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

Equivalent property damage only (EPDO Crash frequency)

EPDO crash frequency with EB adjustment

Relative severity index

Crash rate

Critical rate

Level of service of safety (LOSS)

Excess expected crash frequency using SPFs

Excess expected crash frequency with the EB adjustment

Excess expected crash frequency using method of moments
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

17

Probability of specific crash types

Excess proportions of specific crash types

Other 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

No

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

No

If no, describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

The local roads utilize specific studies to determine project needs.

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process

selection committee

Other-District and Traffic operations input

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Relative Weight in Scoring

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

18

Available funding 1

Incremental B/C

Ranking based on net benefit

Cost Effectiveness

Judgement based - some 

systemic geometric 

improvements and some crashed 

based

2

Program: Low-Cost Spot Improvements

Date of Program Methodology: 10/9/2011

 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway

All crashes Traffic Median width

Fatal crashes only Volume Horizontal curvature

Fatal and serious injury 

crashes only

Population Functional classification

Other Lane miles Roadside features

Other Other 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency

Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

19

Equivalent property damage only (EPDO Crash frequency)

EPDO crash frequency with EB adjustment

Relative severity index

Crash rate

Critical rate

Level of service of safety (LOSS)

Excess expected crash frequency using SPFs

Excess expected crash frequency with the EB adjustment

Excess expected crash frequency using method of moments

Probability of specific crash types

Excess proportions of specific crash types

Other 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

No

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process

selection committee

Other-District and Traffic operations input

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

20

Relative Weight in Scoring

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C 1

Available funding 2

Incremental B/C

Ranking based on net benefit

Cost Effectiveness

Program: Sign Replacement And Improvement

Date of Program Methodology: 10/9/2008

 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway

All crashes Traffic Median width

Fatal crashes only Volume Horizontal curvature

Fatal and serious injury 

crashes only

Population Functional classification

Other Lane miles Roadside features

Other Other-Age and condition of 

signs

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

21

Crash frequency

Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

Equivalent property damage only (EPDO Crash frequency)

EPDO crash frequency with EB adjustment

Relative severity index

Crash rate

Critical rate

Level of service of safety (LOSS)

Excess expected crash frequency using SPFs

Excess expected crash frequency with the EB adjustment

Excess expected crash frequency using method of moments

Probability of specific crash types

Excess proportions of specific crash types

Other-Age of signs in combination with functional classification of the roadway is the main factor 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

No

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

No

If no, describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

Sign replacement and improvement projects are done through the WRRSP methodology for Counties. 

For Urban communities these type of projects are done on a corridor basis.

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation?
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

22

Competitive application process

selection committee

Other-District and Traffic operatins input

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Relative Weight in Scoring

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C

Available funding 2

Incremental B/C

Ranking based on net benefit

Cost Effectiveness

Relative age of signage and 

functional classification

1

Program: Local Safety

Date of Program Methodology: 10/9/2008

 

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

23

All crashes Traffic Median width

Fatal crashes only Volume Horizontal curvature

Fatal and serious injury 

crashes only

Population Functional classification

Other Lane miles Roadside features

Other Other-A simple roadway drive 

through rating is used to identify 

roadway features needing 

improvement

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Crash frequency

Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

Equivalent property damage only (EPDO Crash frequency)

EPDO crash frequency with EB adjustment

Relative severity index

Crash rate

Critical rate

Level of service of safety (LOSS)

Excess expected crash frequency using SPFs

Excess expected crash frequency with the EB adjustment

Excess expected crash frequency using method of moments

Probability of specific crash types

Excess proportions of specific crash types

Other 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

24

Yes

No

If yes, are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

No

If no, describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

The Wyoming Rural Road Safety Program (WRRSP) utilizes crash data and drive through surveys to rank 

and prioritize local road safety needs and assists in identifying projects to address needs.

How are highway safety improvement projects advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process

selection committee

Other 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate 

the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Relative Weight in Scoring

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C

Available funding 2

Incremental B/C

Ranking based on net benefit

Cost Effectiveness 1
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

25

What proportion of highway safety improvement program funds address systemic improvements? 

70

Highway safety improvment program funds are used to address which of the following systemic 

improvments?

Cable Median Barriers Rumble Strips

Traffic Control Device Rehabilitation Pavement/Shoulder Widening

Install/Improve Signing Install/Improve Pavement Marking and/or 

Delineation

Upgrade Guard Rails Clear Zone Improvements

Safety Edge Install/Improve Lighting

Add/Upgrade/Modify/Remove Traffic Signal Other 

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? 

Engineering Study

Road Safety Assessment

Other: Other-Use of Crash Information to identify over-represented crash types to be addressed
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

26

Identify any program methodology practices used to implement the HSIP that have changed since the 

last reporting period.

Highway Safety Manual

Road Safety audits

Systemic Approach

Other: 

Describe any other aspects of the Highway Safety Improvement Program methodology on which you 

would like to elaborate. 

none

Progress in Implementing Projects

Funds Programmed

Reporting period for Highway Safety Improvement Program funding.

Calendar Year

State Fiscal Year

Federal Fiscal Year

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category.
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

27

Funding Category Programmed* Obligated

HSIP (Section 148) 14842000 21 % 14842000 21 %

HRRRP (SAFETEA-LU) 347000 0 % 216000 0 %

HRRR Special Rule

Penalty Transfer -

Section 154

5466661 8 % 5466661 8 %

Penalty Transfer –

Section 164

5466661 8 % 5466661 8 %

Incentive Grants - 

Section 163

Incentive Grants (Section 

406)

Other Federal-aid Funds 

(i.e. STP, NHPP)

40917678 58 % 40917678 59 %

State and Local Funds 2950000 4 % 2950000 4 %

Totals 69990000 100% 69859000 100%

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and maintained) safety projects? 

$2,950,000.00

How much funding is obligated to local safety projects?

$2,950,000.00
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

28

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

$0.00

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$0.00

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas during the reporting 

period?

$0.00

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during the reporting 

period? 

$0.00

Discuss impediments to obligating Highway Safety Improvement Program funds and plans to 

overcome this in the future.

Wyoming doesn't have any impediments to obligating Highway Safety Improvement Program 

funds.

Describe any other aspects of the general Highway Safety Improvement Program implementation 

progress on which you would like to elaborate.

None
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

29

General Listing of Projects

List each highway safety improvement project obligated during the reporting period. 

Project Improvem

ent 

Category 

Outp

ut 

HSIP Cost Total Cost Funding 

Categor

y

Functiona

l 

Classificat

ion

AA

DT

Spe

ed

Roadwa

y 

Owners

hip

Relationship to 

SHSP

Empha

sis 

Area

Strate

gy

HSIP 0.00 

B139027-00 

STWD/VAR LOC/I80US 30/US189

0 -165658 -165658 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HRRR 0.00 

CN07104-00 

HRRR/GO 

CO/SHEEP CR CO 

RD #72

0 -100000 -100000 HSIPHIGH 

RISK 

RURAL 

RDS. 

RE. 

Rural 

Minor 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B139018-00 

STWD/VAR 

LOC/EPOXY 

STRIPING

0 -85965 1155506 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B101021-00 DIST 

0 -57385.21 -73929.14 HIGHW

AY 

Rural 

Principal 

100

0

55 State 

Highway 
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

30

1/VAR LOC/I-25/I80SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Arterial -

Interstate

Agency

HRRR 0.00 

CN12055-00 

HRRR/LN CO/VAR 

LOC/CULVERT EXT

0 -56104.1 -56104.1 HSIPHIGH 

RISK 

RURAL 

ROAD 

Rural 

Minor 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 22.70 

P261031-00 LARACOLO ST 

LINE/GUARDRAIL

0 -42531 394521 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Minor 

Arterial

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B135017-00 DIST 

5/VAR 

LOC/GUARDRAIL

0 -38006 545592 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HRRR 0.00 

CN12060-00 

HRRR/LN CO/CO 

RD #135

0 -30766 -30766 HSIPHIGH 

RISK RU 

RD S-LU 

EXT 

Rural 

Minor 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HRRR 0.00 

CN16022-00 

HRRR/JO CO/VAR 

0 -21454.81 -21454.81 HSIPHIGH 

RISK 

Rural 

Minor 

100

0

55 State 

Highway 
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

31

LOC/09 RURAL 

ROAD 

Collector Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B099018-00 

STWD/VAR 

LOC/EPOXY 

STRIPING

0 -19684.92 -

30996.7100000

001

HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B101021-00 DIST 

1/VAR LOC/I-25/I80

0 -16543.93 -73929.14 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

AML12 104.34 

1401007-00 MNVLLNCE/WYATTE CR

0 -14235 -14235 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B109014-00 

STWD/VAR 

LOC/EPOXY 

STRIPING

0 -10545.94 -18671.1 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B099018-00 

STWD/VAR 

LOC/EPOXY 

0 -

8181.07000000

001

-

30996.7100000

001

HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

32

STRIPING PROG Other

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B109014-00 

STWD/VAR 

LOC/EPOXY 

STRIPING

0 -6774.84 -18671.1 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B103013-00 DIST 

3/VAR 

LOC/GUARDRAIL

0 -3763.28 -3763.28 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 100.49 

0202052-00 LOVLEMBL/STR CJJ & 

CJN

0 -3620 45132.88 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 70.62 

I252156-00 BRDX 

LIGHTING & DMS

0 -3545.19 -6700.68 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B109015-00 

STWD/VAR 

LOC/RUMBLE 

0 -3423.79 -3423.79 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

33

STRIPS/10 PROG 

HSIP-SEP 70.62 

I252156-00 BRDX 

LIGHTING & DMS

0 -3155.49 -6700.68 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B099018-00 

STWD/VAR 

LOC/EPOXY 

STRIPING

0 -3130.72 -

30996.7100000

001

HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

ACHSIP 0.00 

B081058-00 I-25/I80/SIGNS

0 -2029.72 -3412.52 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

ACHSIP 0.00 

B081058-00 I-25/I80/SIGNS

0 -1382.8 -3412.52 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B109014-00 

STWD/VAR 

LOC/EPOXY 

0 -

1350.31999999

995

-18671.1 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SRural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

34

STRIPING LU EXT 

HSIP 203.19 

N854072-00 MULE 

CR JCTNEWC/SNOW 

FENCE

0 -1104.68 -1104.68 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HRRR 0.00 

CN10095-00 

HRRR/FR CO/VAR 

LOC/GUARDRAIL

0 -

0.42999999999

3015

-

0.42999999999

3015

HSIPHIGH 

RISK RU 

RD S-LU 

EXT 

Rural 

Minor 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HRRR 0.00 

CN06065-00 

HRRR/CB CO/VAR 

LOC/09

0 -

0.29000000000

0873

-

0.29000000000

0873

HSIPHIGH 

RISK 

RURAL 

ROAD 

Rural 

Minor 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 16.55 

B132016-00 DIST 

2/VAR 

LOC/GUARDRAIL

0 1810 1390378 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-HP 107.11 

N203064-00 RIVESHOS/HONOR 

FARM ROAD

0 1810 1810 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SRural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

35

LU EXT 

HSIP 0.00 

B139108-00 DIST 2 

& DIST 

3/PAVEMENT 

MARK

0 1916 832273 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 110.80 

N212113-00 WYO 

220/ROBERTSON 

RD

0 2570 28266 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B102076-00 DIST 

2/VARIOUS 

LOC/SIGNS

0 4525 4525 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HP 105.31 

N203055-00 RIVE 

ST/WY789/FEDERL

/PARK INTS

0 4525 4525 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B135041-00 DIST 

5/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 4630 198449 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SRural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

36

LU EXT 

HSIP 187.20 

I804254-00 DIST 

1/I-80/SIGN 

INSTALLATION

0 4638 24184 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 173.74 

N854073-00 LUSKMULE/SEP

0 5123 5123 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B134040-00 DIST 

4/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 5264 404455 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B131037-00 DIST 

1/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 5269 291556 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B132038-00 DIST 

2/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 5269 176389 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SRural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

37

LU EXT 

HSIP 0.00 

B134040-00 DIST 

4/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 5833.84 404455 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 70.55 

N853090-00 CHEYHAWK 

SPRINGS/SEP

0 5871 5871 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 211.46 

I804252-00 RAWL 

MARGINAL/MEDIA

N CABLE

0 6493 6493 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B131102-00 DIST 

1/VAR LOC/EPOXY 

MARKINGS

0 6711 1099926 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 1.42 

2200017-00 

GOOSEBERRY RD

0 9049 9049 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SRural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

38

LU EXT 

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B124028-00 DIST 

4/VAR 

LOC/GRDRAIL 

UPGRADE

0 9050 949643 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 115.20 

P212096-00 

CASP/CY&POPLAR

0 9108 1385142 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B133039-00 DIST 

3/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 9794 189572 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 107.97 

N432059-00 GILL 

STS/UNION 

CHAPEL

0 9794 9794 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B125025-00 DIST 

5/VAR LOC/CURVE 

CHEVRON

0 9954 89820 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SRural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

39

LU EXT 

HSIP-SEP 34.11 

B115031-00 DIST 

5/VAR LOC/BOX 

BEAM GRDRL

0 11094 11094 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Minor 

Arterial

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B131105-00 DIST 

1/DMS & HAR

0 13588.25 388531 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B154020-00 DIST 

4/VAR 

LOC/GUARDRAIL

0 14690 14690 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B154021-00 DIST 

4/VAR LOC/SIGNS

0 14690 14690 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B135041-00 DIST 

5/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 17620 198449 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

40

HSIP 

HSIP 0.00 

B133026-00 DIST 

3/ VAR 

LOC/LIGHTING

0 17860 1423752 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

HSIP 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B134040-00 DIST 

4/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 18688 404455 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

HSIP 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 187.20 

I804254-00 DIST 

1/I-80/SIGN 

INSTALLATION

0 19546 24184 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 110.80 

N212113-00 WYO 

220/ROBERTSON 

RD

0 25696 28266 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B131037-00 DIST 

1/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 26026 291556 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

41

HSIP 

HRRR 0.00 

CN06067-00 

HRRR/CB 

CO/SEMINOE DAM 

RD #351

0 30057 30057 HSIPHIGH 

RISK 

RURAL 

ROAD 

Rural 

Minor 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

1507037-00 CHIEF 

JOSEPH/WYO 

296/GUARDRAIL

0 33160 33160 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B133039-00 DIST 

3/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 34525 189572 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

HSIP 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B134040-00 DIST 

4/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 34887.16 404455 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

ACSTP-CR 0.00 

CN10093-00 FR 

CO/CR #334/17 M 

RD/WEST SEC

0 38911 38911 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

42

PROG 

HSIP-SEP 316.28 

I805168-00 LARACHEY/ACCEL 

RAMPS

0 39151 431316 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B132038-00 DIST 

2/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 39490 176389 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

HSIP 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 22.70 

P261031-00 LARACOLO ST 

LINE/GUARDRAIL

0 39732 394521 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Minor 

Arterial

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B141027-00 DIST 

1/VAR 

LOC/GUARDRAIL

0 46648 46648 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 100.49 

0202052-00 LOVLEMBL/STR CJJ & 

CJN

0 48752.88 45132.88 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SRural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

43

LU EXT 

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B135017-00 DIST 

5/VAR 

LOC/GUARDRAIL

0 52859 545592 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 67.86 

N362036-00 BUFF 

WEST

0 72392 1015185 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B131105-00 DIST 

1/DMS & HAR

0 73760.75 388531 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B139108-00 DIST 2 

& DIST 

3/PAVEMENT 

MARK

0 75487 832273 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

HSIP 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 38.00 

P142048-00 FARSLAND/SLOPE 

FLATTENING

0 79706 876771 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

Rural 

Minor 

Arterial

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

44

PROG 

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B125025-00 DIST 

5/VAR LOC/CURVE 

CHEVRON

0 79866 89820 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HRRR 0.00 

CN12057-00 

HRRR/LN CO/VAR 

LOC/GUARDRAIL

0 83884 83884 HSIPHIGH 

RISK 

RURAL 

ROAD 

Rural 

Minor 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B124028-00 DIST 

4/VAR 

LOC/GRDRAIL 

UPGRADE

0 85509 949643 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 67.86 

N362036-00 BUFF 

WEST

0 85709 1015185 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 9.00 

B142029-00 DIST 

2/VAR LOC/SAFETY 

GRADING

0 86289 86289 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SRural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

45

LU EXT 

HSIP-SEP 34.00 

N361064-00 TENSBUFF/SEP

0 91961 91961 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B131102-00 DIST 

1/VAR LOC/EPOXY 

MARKINGS

0 99383 1099926 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

HSIP 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 115.20 

P212096-00 

CASP/CY&POPLAR

0 112745 1385142 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B139018-00 

STWD/VAR 

LOC/EPOXY 

STRIPING

0 112861 1155506 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

SIB-ACNH 7.83 

N301015-00 

MRANDUBO/ROSIES 

0 124659 124659 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

46

RDGE/RECONST HSIP 

HSIP 0.00 

B133026-00 DIST 

3/ VAR 

LOC/LIGHTING

0 127808 1423752 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

HSIP 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B132038-00 DIST 

2/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 131630 176389 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

HSIP 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B149028-00 

STWD/VAR 

LOC/EPOXY 

STRIPING

0 140912 140912 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B133039-00 DIST 

3/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 145253 189572 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

HSIP 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 16.55 

B132016-00 DIST 

2/VAR 

LOC/GUARDRAIL

0 156299 1390378 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SRural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

47

LU EXT 

HSIP 0.00 

B135041-00 DIST 

5/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 176199 198449 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

HSIP 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HRRR 0.00 

B099075-00 

HRRR/UW/TECH 

TRANS CENTER

0 180000 180000 HSIPHIGH 

RISK 

RURAL 

ROAD 

Rural 

Minor 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B131037-00 DIST 

1/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 260261 291556 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

HSIP 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B131105-00 DIST 

1/DMS & HAR

0 301182 388531 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B134040-00 DIST 

4/VAR LOC/PVMT 

MARKINGS

0 339782 404455 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

48

HSIP 

HSIP-SEP 316.28 

I805168-00 LARACHEY/ACCEL 

RAMPS

0 392165 431316 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 22.70 

P261031-00 LARACOLO ST 

LINE/GUARDRAIL

0 397320 394521 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Minor 

Arterial

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B135017-00 DIST 

5/VAR 

LOC/GUARDRAIL

0 530739 545592 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B104002-00 DIST 

4/VAR LOC/DMS

0 530913 5840042 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Minor 

Arterial

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

ACNH 101.60 

N212107-00 

MUDGCASP/NARROWS/S

0 570170 6271865 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

49

LIDE REPAIR HSIP 

HSIP 0.00 

B139108-00 DIST 2 

& DIST 

3/PAVEMENT 

MARK

0 754870 832273 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

HSIP 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 38.00 

P142048-00 FARSLAND/SLOPE 

FLATTENING

0 797065 876771 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Minor 

Arterial

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B124028-00 DIST 

4/VAR 

LOC/GRDRAIL 

UPGRADE

0 855084 949643 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 67.86 

N362036-00 BUFF 

WEST

0 857084 1015185 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B131102-00 DIST 

1/VAR LOC/EPOXY 

MARKINGS

0 993832 1099926 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

50

HSIP 

HSIP-SEP 0.00 

B139018-00 

STWD/VAR 

LOC/EPOXY 

STRIPING

0 1128610 1155506 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Major 

Collector

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP-SEP 16.55 

B132016-00 DIST 

2/VAR 

LOC/GUARDRAIL

0 1232269 1390378 HWY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG SLU EXT 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 115.20 

P212096-00 

CASP/CY&POPLAR

0 1263289 1385142 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Urban 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B133026-00 DIST 

3/ VAR 

LOC/LIGHTING

0 1278084 1423752 SEC 164 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

HSIP 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

ACNH 101.60 

N212107-00 

MUDGCASP/NARROWS/S

0 1513118 6271865 SEC 154 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

51

LIDE REPAIR HSIP 

ACNH 101.60 

N212107-00 

MUDGCASP/NARROWS/S

LIDE REPAIR

0 4188577 6271865 SEC 164 

PENALT

IES -

FOR 

HSIP 

Rural 

Principal 

Arterial -

Other

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

HSIP 0.00 

B104002-00 DIST 

4/VAR LOC/DMS

0 5309129 5840042 HIGHW

AY 

SAFETY 

IMP 

PROG 

Rural 

Minor 

Arterial

100

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

52

Progress in Achieving Safety Performance Targets

Overview of General Safety Trends

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the state for the past five years. 

Performance Measures* 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Number of fatalities 159 134 153 135 120

Number of serious injuries 748 637 572 485 458

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 1.71 1.44 1.8 1.84 1.73

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 0 0 0 0 0

*Performance measure data is presented using a five-year rolling average.
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

53
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

54
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

55

To the maximum extent possible, present performance measure* data by functional classification and ownership. 

Year - 2012

Function Classification Number of fatalities Number of serious injuries Fatality rate (per HMVMT) Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

RURAL PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE

24 91 0.97 3.68

RURAL PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - OTHER 

FREEWAYS AND 

EXPRESSWAYS

0 0 0 0

RURAL PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - OTHER

39 110 2.37 6.7

RURAL MINOR 

ARTERIAL

9 32 1.9 6.76

RURAL MINOR 

COLLECTOR

6 32 2.42 19.34

RURAL MAJOR 

COLLECTOR

0 0 0 0

RURAL LOCAL ROAD OR 

STREET

0 0 0 0

URBAN PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 0
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

56

ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE

URBAN PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - OTHER 

FREEWAYS AND 

EXPRESSWAYS

0 0 0 0

URBAN PRINCIPAL 

ARTERIAL - OTHER

0 0 0 0

URBAN MINOR 

ARTERIAL

0 0 0 0

URBAN MINOR 

COLLECTOR

0 0 0 0

URBAN MAJOR 

COLLECTOR

0 0 0 0

URBAN LOCAL ROAD 

OR STREET

0 0 0 0

OTHER 0 0 0 0

OTHER 0 0 0 0
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

57
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

58
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

59
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

60
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

61

Year - 2012

Roadway Ownership Number of fatalities Number of serious injuries Fatality rate (per HMVMT) Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

STATE HIGHWAY 

AGENCY

0 0 0 0

COUNTY HIGHWAY 

AGENCY

0 0 0 0

TOWN OR TOWNSHIP 

HIGHWAY AGENCY

0 0 0 0

CITY OF MUNICIPAL 

HIGHWAY AGENCY

0 0 0 0

STATE PARK, FOREST, 

OR RESERVATION 

AGENCY

0 0 0 0

LOCAL PARK, FOREST 

OR RESERVATION 

AGENCY

0 0 0 0

OTHER STATE AGENCY 0 0 0 0

OTHER LOCAL AGENCY 0 0 0 0

PRIVATE (OTHER 

THAN RAILROAD)

0 0 0 0
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

62

RAILROAD 0 0 0 0

STATE TOLL 

AUTHORITY

0 0 0 0

LOCAL TOLL 

AUTHORITY

0 0 0 0

OTHER PUBLIC 

INSTRUMENTALITY 

(E.G. AIRPORT, 

SCHOOL, UNIVERSITY)

0 0 0 0

INDIAN TRIBE NATION 0 0 0 0

OTHER 0 0 0 0

OTHER 0 0 0 0
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

63
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

64
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

65
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

66
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

67

The listed fatal and serious injury statistics are for the major functional classifications for the State. The number of fatalities shown 

for 2012 is 78. The total fatalities for 2012 is 120 and the other 42 were spread out over County Roads, City Streets and other 

roadways. The volume data for these other roadways is difficult to obtain and thus the reporting of it in this manner is not readily 

available.

The ownership data is unavailable for reporting in this format at this time.

Wyoming is working on the ability to report statistics in various formats and will work towards improvements in reporting of 

information for all user needs.
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

68

Describe any other aspects of the general highway safety trends on which you would like to elaborate.

Wyoming is seeing an overall reduction in the fatalities and serious injuries occurring in the 

state. The trend is positive but improvements can still be made. Wyoming crash statistics tend 

to move wildly when compared year to year. We have a relatively few number of fatal crashes 

and are working towards zero deaths.

Application of Special Rules

Present the rate of traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and pedestrians over the 

age of 65. 

Older Driver

Performance Measures

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Fatality rate (per capita) 0 0 0 0 0

Serious injury rate (per 

capita)

0 0 0 0 0

Fatality and serious injury 

rate (per capita)

0 0 0 0 0

*Performance measure data is presented using a five-year rolling average.

Wyoming does not do this type of analysis.
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

69

Does the older driver special rule apply to your state? 

No
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

70

Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Improvements (Program 

Evaluation)

What indicators of success can you use to demonstrate effectiveness and success in the Highway 

Safety Improvement Program?

None

Benefit/cost

Policy change

Other: Other-Fatalities and serious injury crashes are decreasing in the State
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

71

What significant programmatic changes have occurred since the last reporting period? 

Shift Focus to Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Include Local Roads in Highway Safety Improvement Program

Organizational Changes

None

Other: 
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

72

Briefly describe significant program changes that have occurred since the last reporting period. 

Wyoming has rolled out to the decision-makers in the Districts a tool to assess the benefits and 

costs of various treatment options on projects. The tool is just now beginning to be utilized and 

should assist in focusing efforts on the most effective projects for the limited funding available.
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

73

SHSP Emphasis Areas
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

74

For each SHSP emphasis area that relates to the HSIP, present trends in emphasis area performance measures. 

Year - 2012

HSIP-related SHSP 

Emphasis Areas

Target 

Crash Type

Number of 

fatalities

Number of 

serious injuries

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT)

Serious injury rate 

(per HMVMT)

Other1Other2Other3
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

75
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

76
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

77

Wyoming has a bar chart of all of our emphasis areas within the SHSP comparing the numbers of critical crashes in three year 

groupings for comparison purposes. I am unable to upload the chart into the report at this time, but the information is contained in 

our current SHSP.
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

78

Groups of similar project types
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

79

Present the overall effectiveness of groups of similar types of projects.

Year - 2012

HSIP Sub-program 

Types

Target 

Crash Type

Number of 

fatalities

Number of 

serious injuries

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT)

Serious injury rate 

(per HMVMT)

Other1Other2Other3
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

80
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

81
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

82
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

83

Wyoming doesn't track sub-program types at this time. The development of information on sub-program grouping of project types 

is on going. For this report the question does not apply.
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

84

Systemic Treatments
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

85

Present the overall effectiveness of systemic treatments.. 

Year - 2012

Systemic 

improvement

Target 

Crash Type

Number of 

fatalities

Number of 

serious injuries

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT)

Serious injury rate 

(per HMVMT)

Other1Other2Other3
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

86
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

87
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

88
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

89

The information for Systemic Treatments is unavailable at this time. Work is being done to create a geometric index for on system 

roadways in the State of Wyoming to address systemic treatments and their effectiveness.
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

90

Describe any other aspects of the overall Highway Safety Improvement Program effectiveness on 

which you would like to elaborate. 

The overall trend for crashes in Wyoming is down. We are implementing various projects 

related to our SHSP. We can improve the focus but have a pretty good idea of what types of 

projects and improvements are giving us the best results for our main crash problem which is 

leaving your lane and running off the road. Single vehicle crashes. Many of the systemic 

treatments that we have implemented over the past five years are targeted toward this crash 

type.
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

91

Provide project evaluation data for completed projects (optional). 

Location Functional 

Class

Improvement 

Category

Improvement 

Type

BefFatalBefSerious 

Injury

BefOther 

Injury

BefPDOBefTotalAftFatalAftSerious 

Injury

AftOther 

Injury

AftPDOAftTotalEvaluation 

Results 

(Benefit/ 

Cost Ratio)

Statewide All 

functional 

classes

Roadway Rumble strips -

edge or 

shoulder

Wyoming does not have this information available at this time. We are working on a methodology to address systemic treatments.
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

92

Optional Attachments

Sections Files Attached
2013 Wyoming Highway Safety Improvement Program

93

Glossary

5 year rolling average means the average of five individual, consecutive annual points of data (e.g. 

annual fatality rate).

Emphasis area means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process. 

Highway safety improvement project means strategies, activities and projects on a public road that are 

consistent with a State strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous road location 

or feature or addresses a highway safety problem. 

HMVMT means hundred million vehicle miles traveled.

Non-infrastructure projects are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of noninfrastructure projects include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, 

improvements in the collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement 

activities.

Older driver special rule applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and 

pedestrians over the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which data 

are available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance dated 

February 13, 2013. 

Performance measure means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to monitor 

changes in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and objectives.

Programmed funds mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects.

Roadway Functional Classification means the process by which streets and highways are grouped into 

classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on safety 

data developed by a State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148. 

Systemic safety improvement means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high risk 

roadway features that are correlated with specific severe crash types. 

Transfer means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal 

year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.