alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 2, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                             740
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      842
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (44)
<INVENTORY>                                        946
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,640
<PP&E>                                           1,223
<DEPRECIATION>                                     844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,769
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,363
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,970)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,245
<SALES>                                          6,646
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,646
<CGS>                                            3,894
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (50)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,913)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,915)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,915)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.54)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TODD SCHUTZUES, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-367 Erie

v. )

)

MARILYN BROOKS, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on December 16,

2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13], filed on

August 23, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be dismissed as moot. The

parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service

was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondents. No objections were

filed. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the

Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DISMISSED as moot. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on August 23, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00367-SJM-SPB Document 14 Filed 09/13/06 Page 1 of 1
**President**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Michael G. Clark, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of The European Equity Fund, Inc., on Form N-CSR; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or §15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| February 29, 2008 | /s/Michael G. Clark            |
|-------------------|--------------------------------|
|              | Michael G. Clark               |
|              | President                      |
|              | The European Equity Fund, Inc. |

 

 

 

 

**Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**

**Section 906 Certification under Sarbanes Oxley Act**

 

 

 

I, Paul Schubert, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this report, filed on behalf of The European Equity Fund, Inc., on Form N-CSR; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the periodic report on Form N-CSR (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13 (a) or § 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| February 29, 2008 | /s/Paul Schubert                      |
|-------------------|---------------------------------------|
|              | Paul Schubert                         |
|              | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|              | The European Equity Fund, Inc.        |
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3122 

To amend the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 to provide 

for the denial of certain applications for solar or wind energy development 

projects right-of-way applications. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Mr. RISCH (for himself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 

of 1976 to provide for the denial of certain applications 

for solar or wind energy development projects right-ofway applications. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Don’t Develop Ob5 structive Infrastructure on our Terrain Act’’ or the ‘‘Don’t 

6 DO IT Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3122 IS

1 SEC. 2. DENIAL OF CERTAIN SOLAR AND WIND ENERGY DE2 VELOPMENT PROJECT RIGHT-OF-WAY APPLI3 CATIONS. 

4 Section 501 of the Federal Land Policy and Manage5 ment Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1761) is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(e) SOLAR OR WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT

8 PROJECT RIGHT-OF-WAY APPLICATIONS.—Notwith9 standing any other provision of this section, in the case 

10 of a solar or wind energy development project right-of-way 

11 application submitted under this section, the Secretary 

12 shall deny the application if the Secretary has received 

13 from the Governor of the State in which the proposed 

14 project is located notice that the State legislature has en15 acted legislation disapproving the proposed project.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ConMat Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
F. Sager, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

   (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                        /s/ Edward F. Sager, Jr.
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Edward F. Sager, Jr.
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                        October 18, 2002









                                       17
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

NOV 2201\ 

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY Ms. Deborah Goldberg AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

Earthjustice 

156 William Street, Suite 800 

New York, NY 10038 

Re: TSCA Section 21 Petition Concerning Chemical Substances and Mixtures Used in Oil and 

Gas Exploration or Production 

Dear Ms. Goldberg: 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is continuing its review of the petition 

concerning chemical substances and mixtures used in oil and gas exploration or production 

(E&P) that you and other petitioners filed under section 21 ofthe Toxic Substances Control Act 

(TSCA) on August 4, 20 II. 

Your petition requests that EPA require manufacturers and processors of E&P chemical 

substances and mixtures to : I) develop test data pursuant to TSCA Section 4, and 2) maintain 

records and submit reports to the EPA on E&P chemical substances and mixtures and any data 

on environmental or health effects and exposures pursuant to TSCA section 8(a). Further, it 

requests that EPA have manufacturers, processors and distributors: 1) submit copies of any 

information related to significant adverse reactions to health or environment pursuant to TSCA 

section 8(c), and 2) submit health and safety studies related to E&P chemical substances and 

mixtures pursuant to TSCA section 8( d). 

You have suggested to us that additional data would be useful to inform the work of the 

Agency and the broader Federal government, as well as the public, on this important issue and 

that TSCA may be a valuable authority to provide a national picture of the chemical substances 

and mixtures used in hydraulic fracturing. EPA is therefore considering and conducting 

additional analysis on the TSCA section 8(a) and section 8(d) requests in your petition. We 

need a short but important extension of time for this review and plan to provide a full response to 

the petition no later than November 23, 20 II. 

EPA is denying the TSCA section 4 request in the petition for issuance of a test rule. The 

petition does not set forth sufficient facts to support the assertion that it is "necessary to issue" 

the requested TSCA section 4 rule, as required by TSCA section 21(b)(I). Specifically, the 

petition did not set forth facts sufficient to support the required fmdings under TSCA section 

4(a)(I)(A) or 4(a)(I)(B) for issuance ofa test rule covering all chemical substances and mixtures 

used in oil and gas exploration and production. 

Internet Address (URl) • httpll,WAllepa gov 


Recyc led/Recyclable' Pnnted with Vegetable 011 Based Inks on 100% Poslconsumer, Process ChlOrine Free Recycled Paper 

We believe natural gas is an important component of our domestic energy portfolio but 

that at the same time the resource can and should be responsibly developed, building off the 

important work that has already been done by the states, the industry, and others to disclose 

crucial information to the American public. 

Thank you for your continued interest in the Agency's efforts to assess and manage 

chemical risks. 

c::: Ste~ A. Owens 

AssiS@lt Administrator
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Encore Medical Corporation

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-48240), on Form S-8 of Encore Medical Corporation of our report dated March
1, 2002, related to the balance sheet of Encore Medical Corporation as of
December 31, 2001, and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the
December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Encore Medical Corporation.


                                 /s/ KPMG LLP
Exhibit 31.2
                           Section 302 Certifications

I, Mark Scott, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;

   b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5, 2003)];
and

   c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and

   d) disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  August 10, 2004                 /s/ Mark Scott
                                       -------------------
                                       Mark Scott
                                       Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RYAN KERWIN, )

Plaintiff, )

)

Vs. ) Civil Action No. 05-93 Erie

)

LT. WILLIAM MCCONNELL, )

Defendant. )

O R D E R 

AND NOW, to wit, this 3rd day of April, 2006, after consideration of the 

Plaintiff’s Appeal of Magistrate Judge’s Order dated March 3, 2006

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is DENIED. The March 3, 2006, 

Order of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter is AFFIRMED.

 S/Sean J. McLaughlin 

Sean J. McLaughlin 

United States District Judge

cc: all parties of record

Case 1:05-cv-00093-SJM Document 59 Filed 04/03/06 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 


FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 


ANTONIO D. FERGUSON, ) 

) Civil Action No. 09 - 72E 

Petitioner, ) 

) District Judge Maurice B. Cohill 

v. ) 

) 

SUPERINTENDENT DAVID DIGUGLIELMO; ) 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE ) 

OF PENNSYLVANIA, and THE DISTRICT ) 

ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE, ) 

BRADLEY H. FOULK; ) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

MEMORANDUM ORDER 

On March 31,2009, the above captioned case was initiated by the filing of Petition for Writ 

ofHabeas Corpus and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial 

proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), and Rules 72.1.3 

and 72.1.4 ofthe Local Rules for Magistrate Judges. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed on June 16,2010 (ECF no. 15) 

recommended that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and that a certificate of 

appealability be denied. On July 21, 2010, Petitioner filed Objections to the Report and 

Recommendation (ECF no. 17). Petitioner's objections do not undermine the recommendation of 

the Magistrate Judge. 

Case 1:09-cv-00072-DSC-LPL Document 18 Filed 08/05/10 Page 1 of 2
After de novo review ofthe pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report 

and Recommendation, and the Objections thereto, the following order is entered: 

r;;. AND NOW, this day of August, 2010; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is 

DENIED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF no. 15) 

is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. 

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(I) of the Federal 

Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by 

Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

7He" ;A t':'" t! fa 6.'IlL,\! . MaUrIce B. Cohill 

United States District Judge 

cc: 	 Antonio D. Ferguson 

GB-8731 

SCI Graterford 

P.O. Box 244 


Graterford, P A 19426-0244 


2 


Case 1:09-cv-00072-DSC-LPL Document 18 Filed 08/05/10 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 12.2**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I, DanielGonzález, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of YPF S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financialreporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:March 30, 2015.