alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JALANI DUPREE MARTIN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 207 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### Walter H. HEAD, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40355.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 17, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 239 So.2d 537.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 11
                               AGEMARK CORPORATION

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                        THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                            DECEMBER 31,
                                                                                   ----------------------------
                                                                                       2000            1999
                                                                                   ------------    ------------

<S>                                                                                  <C>              <C>
Weighted average common shares actually outstanding                                  1,000,000        1,000,000

Net shares assumed issued prior to the period attributable to stock options
   issued prior to the period                                                          191,584          187,987

Net shares attributable to options ceded during the period                              -5,890             -405

Stock options issued November 10, 1999 at $1.00 per share                                                 5,000

Assumed proceeds of exercise                                                                             $5,000

Number of shares assumed purchased at 5.97/share(1)                                                         838

Net shares assumed issued at December 1, 1999                                                             4,162

Weighted average common shares assumed outstanding for period                        1,185,694        1,188,969

-------------------

(1)  There is no market for the Company's shares. For computational purposes the
     value assumed is the September 30, 1998 book value per share.
</TABLE>

                                      -15-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MOLLY A. GRINOLDS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 09-95 Erie

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTURE, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff’s social security complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on April

27, 2009 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter

for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13], filed on July

22, 2010, recommended that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 7] be

denied, and that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 9] be granted. 

The parties were allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file objections. 

No objections were filed. After de novo review of the documents in the case, together

with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 10 day of August, 2010; th

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc.

No. 7] is DENIED, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 9] is

GRANTED. JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of Defendant, Michael J. Astrue,

Commissioner of Social Security, and against Plaintiff, Molly A. Grinolds. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on July 22, 2010, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. 

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

Case 1:09-cv-00095-SJM-SPB Document 14 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 2
cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

2

Case 1:09-cv-00095-SJM-SPB Document 14 Filed 08/10/10 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53597-53598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27156]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Defense Technology Base of 
the 21st Century; meeting

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Defense Technology 
Base

[[Page 53598]]

of the 21st Century will meet in closed session on October 29-30, 1997 
at Strategic Analysis, Inc., 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, 
Virginia.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting the Task 
Force will address the issues involved in assuring that the U.S. has 
adequate/appropriate technology base from which to develop sustained 
military superiority for the 21st century; such a base includes 
technology developed by DoD, but also access to technology developed 
elsewhere as well as an assured stream of scientists and engineers that 
will develop technology and build military materiel. Many internal and 
external changes influence DoDs options.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has been 
determined that this DSB Task Force meeting concerns matters listed in 
5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that accordingly this meeting will be closed 
to the public.

    Dated: October 8, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-27156 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Gino M. Pereira, the Chief Financial Officer of Technest Holdings, Inc., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Technest Holdings, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) [intentionally omitted];



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and to the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: February
21, 2006

/s/Gino M. Pereira



Gino M. Pereira

Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-536-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

October 1, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 25, 1997, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on 
Appendix A to the filing, to become effective November 1, 1997.
    Panhandle states that the purpose of the filing is to reinstate the 
Stranded Transportation Cost Reservation Surcharge (ST Reservation 
Surcharge) and the Stranded Transportation Cost Volumetric Surcharge 
(ST Volumetric Surcharge) pursuant to Section 18.13(g) of the General 
Terms and Conditions of Panhandle's tariff. A Reconciliation Recovery 
Period is to be established if Panhandle has not fully recovered the 
total Stranded Transportation Costs at the conclusion of the initial 
recovery period. Panhandle has not completed the recovery of the 
Stranded Transportation Costs as of June 30, 1997 and accordingly is 
proposing to implement a ST Reservation Surcharge of $0.01 per Dt. 
applicable to Rate per Dt. applicable to Rate Schedule SCT and a ST 
Volumetric Surcharge of 0.03 cents per Dt. applicable to Rate Schedules 
IT and EIT to be in effect during the twelve month Section 18.13 
Reconciliation Recovery Period which commences November 1, 1997.
    Panhandle states that copies of its filing are being served on all 
affected customers and applicable state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding.
    Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26485 Filed 10-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Steven Wayne TRIMBOLI, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1008.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 30, 1978.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and W. C. McLain, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Mary Jo M. Gallay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed. *See*Section 924.06(3), Florida Statutes (1977); *Honeycutt*v. *State,*359 So.2d 503 (Fla.2d DCA 1978).

HOBSON A. C. J., and OTT and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53648-53649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27163]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis 
Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Conference on Toward the Genetic Manipulation of 
Insects (Telephone Conference Call).
    Date: October 16, 1997.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to Adjournment.
    Place: Teleconference, 6003 Executive Boulevard, Solar Building, 
Room 4C01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-2550.
    Contact Person: Dr. Sayeed Quraishi, Scientific Review Adm., 
6003 Executive Boulevard, Solar Bldg., Room 4C22, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 496-7465.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate grant application.

    Name of SEP: AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Group Mucosal Immunology 
Laboratory (Telephone Conference Call).
    Date: October 22, 1997.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to Adjournment.
    Place: Teleconference, 6003 Executive Boulevard, Solar Building, 
Room 1A2, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-2550.
    Contact Person: Dr. Sayeed Quraishi, Scientific Review Adm., 
6003 Executive Boulevard, Solar Bldg., Room 4C22, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 496-7465.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate contract proposal.

    Name of SEP: Pneumococcal Reference Laboratory and Clinical 
Trail Laboratory Support (Telephone Conference Call).
    Date: October 27, 1997.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to Adjournment.
    Place: Teleconference, 6003 Executive Boulevard, Solar Building, 
Room 1A2, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-2550.
    Contact Person: Dr. Sayeed Quraishi, Scientific Review Adm., 
6003 Executive Boulevard, Solar Bldg., Room 4C22, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 496-7465.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate contract proposals.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure

[[Page 53649]]

of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meetings due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed 
by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.855, 
Immunology, Allergic and Immunologic Diseases Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health.)

    Dated: October 7, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-27163 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 23.1
  **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-50130, 33-71108, and 333-02396 of Key Technology, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated December 16, 2004 (which report includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the adoption of the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 03-06, *Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement 128* , and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, *Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets* ) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Key Technology, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2004.
   /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
  Portland, Oregon
 December 16, 2004
EXHIBIT 4.5  SUMMARY OF THE AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF SHARES OF BRASILCEL, N.V., DATED JULY 28, 2010, AMONG TELEFÓNICA, S.A., PORTUGAL TELECOM, SGPS, S.A. AND PT MÓVEIS  SERVIÇOS DE TELECOMUNICAÇÕES, SGPS, S.A.  On July 28, 2010, we signed an agreement with Telefónica, S.A., for the acquisition by Telefónica of the 50% of the capital stock of Brasilcel we owned. Brasilcel owned approximately 60% of the total share capital of Vivo Participações, S.A. (Vivo Participações). The acquisition price of such capital stock was 7,500 million, 4,500 million of which was paid at the closing of the transaction on September 27, 2010 and 1,000 million of which was paid on December 30, 2010, with the remaining 2,000 million due on October 31, 2011 (though we may request that this final payment be made on July 29, 2011, in which case such final payment, and correspondingly, the total price of the acquisition, would be reduced by 25 million). The agreement also provided for certain other commercial arrangements between Telefónica and us which were subsequently rendered inapplicable. Upon closing of the transaction, the respective subscription and shareholders agreements entered into by Telefónica and us in 2002 relating to our joint venture in Brazil were terminated.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Roger D. PERKINS.

No. 61108.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 1, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 14, 1977.

In re: Roger D. Perkins applying for supervisory writ of review, prohibition, mandamus and stay order.

Writ granted. The trial court is ordered to allow inspection and scientific testing by defendant of the evidence intended for use *703by the state as evidence at the trial under the court’s supervision, See L.C.Cr.P. art. 718.

SANDERS, C. J.,

dissents from the order issued but would order an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the quantity of the narcotic left is sufficient to permit further testing.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents. I do not agree that the ruling of the trial judge is erroneous.

Rehearing denied;

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., were of the opinion that rehearing should be granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 316 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 316

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To repeal the authorizations for use of military force against Iraq.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST 
              IRAQ RESOLUTION.

    The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution 
(Public Law 102-1; 105 Stat. 3; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby 
repealed.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ 
              RESOLUTION OF 2002.

    The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution 
of 2002 (Public Law 107-243; 116 Stat. 1498; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is 
hereby repealed.

            Passed the Senate March 29, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 316

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To repeal the authorizations for use of military force against Iraq.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26595]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-148-006]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

October 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 30, 1997, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, Third Revised Sheet No. 
371, to become effective November 1, 1997.
    Williston Basin states that the revised tariff sheet reflects 
modifications to Williston Basin's FERC Gas Tariff in compliance with 
the Commission's Letter Order issued July 24, 1997 in Docket No. RP97-
148-004. The tariff sheet reflects the Gas Industry Standards Board 
(GISB) Standards adopted by the Commission in Order No. 587-C to become 
effective November 1, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests should 
be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of the filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26595 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27333]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-3-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

October 9, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 2, 1997, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia), 1700 MacCorkle Avenue, S.E., Charleston, West 
Virginia 25314-1599, filed in Docket No. CP98-3-000 a request pursuant 
to sections 157.205, and 157.211, of the Commission's Regulations under 
the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) for authorization to 
construct and operate a new point of delivery to Bayer Corporation in 
Wetzel Country, West Virginia, under Columbia's blanket certificate 
issued in Docket No. CP83-76-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural 
Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is on file 
with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Columbia states that the point of delivery has been requested by 
Bayer Corporation for industrial service. The estimated quantities of 
natural gas to be delivered will be up to 2,737,500 Dth/annually with a 
volume of 20,000 Dth/day. The estimated cost to construct is $250,000.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27333 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M