alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Nicklebys.com,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Scott Thornock,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Scott Thornock
--------------------------
Scott Thornock
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Mark Scott, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

   b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)];

   c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. As the registrant's certifying officer I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: August 15, 2005                   /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDAJAH SPENCER, a minor, )

by APRIL SPENCER, her mother, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 04-179 Erie

v. )

)

JOANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff’s social security complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on June

24, 2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter

for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 12], filed on

August 3, 2005, recommended that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No.

8] be denied, and that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 10] be

granted. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file

objections. Plaintiff filed objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter’s Report and

Recommendation on August 17, 2005 [Doc. No. 13-1]. After de novo review of the

documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the

objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2005;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc.

No. 8] is DENIED, and that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 10] is

GRANTED. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 12] of Magistrate Judge

Baxter, filed on August 3, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. Judgement is

hereby entered in favor of Defendant, Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social

Security, and against Plaintiff, Midajah Spencer, a minor, by April Spencer, her mother. 

Case 1:04-cv-00179-SJM-SPB Document 14 Filed 09/19/05 Page 1 of 2
2

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:04-cv-00179-SJM-SPB Document 14 Filed 09/19/05 Page 2 of 2
#### Alvis E. ADKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 52993.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 18, 1978.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Frank B. Kessler, Chief Asst. Public Defender, and Jerry L. Schwarz, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marsha G. Madorsky and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

ENGLAND, J., concurs specially with an opinion.

ENGLAND, Justice,

concurring specially.

I would dismiss the appeal as being frivolous.
#### O. H. ROBERTS and Adelaide M. Roberts, his wife, Appellants, v. Harley G. MORSE, operating and doing business as Morse and Company, Appellee.

No. 68-353.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

May 7, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sense Technologies
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and Rule 13a-14(b), that to his
knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.



|Dated: October 15, 2007 | By: | /s/ Bruce E. Schreiner                         
|----------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Bruce E. Schreiner                             
|                        |     | President and Principal Financial
      Officer

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-31086

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK THOMAS MATTHEWS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CR-30015

- - - - - - - - - -

December 22, 1997

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Patrick Matthews has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      20,502,536
<SECURITIES>                                 2,002,266
<RECEIVABLES>                                  101,281
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    400,167
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,731,848
<PP&E>                                      16,139,606
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,456,926
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,179,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,544,285
<BONDS>                                      8,592,755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,354
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,193,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,179,990
<SALES>                                        600,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,268,368
<CGS>                                          334,989
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  696,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,318,234
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,201,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         12,746,117
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,746,117
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan
Margerison, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                        /s/ Alan Margerison
                                        -------------------
                                        Alan Margerison
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        February 3, 2004
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Steven H. Davis, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report of CET Services, Inc.:

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

         (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business
issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5.  The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 2, 2006


/s/ Steven H. Davis
Steven H. Davis
Chief Executive Officer
### I T O F TRANSPORTATIO N AN D PUBLI C FACILITIE S OFFIC E O F TH E COMMISSIONE R SEA N PARNELL , GOVERNO R 411 1 AVIATIO N AVENU E P O Bo x19690 0 ANCHORAGE , ALASK A 99519-690 0 PHONE : (907 ) 269-073 0 FAX : (907 ) 269-048 9 WEB : dot.state.ak.u s

Jun e 25 , 201 0

''•c;; > e > Mr . DennisJ . Deyany___

_ Chief , EA S an dDomesti c Analysi s Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 RE : DOT-OS T 1997-313 4 Dear Mr . DeVany : Thi s lette r

i s t o expres s support

for th e continuatio n o f

th e Essentia l Ai r

Servic e (EAS ) progra m i n Alask aan dth e crucia l coimectio n i t bring s t o ou r

remot e communities . Du e t o th e isolate dlocatio n o f thes e communitie s an dth e complet e lac k o f an y roa dsyste m connection , thi s subsidize dai r servic e i s thei r

onl y for mo f schedule dtransportation . Th e communitie s o f

Chatha man dFunte r

Bay depen do n schedule dai r freight , passenge r

an dmai l servic e for

basi c necessities , routin e medica l an dhealt h services , an deconomi c welfare . Th e Stat e o f

Alask acontinue s t o asser t tha t th e loca l resident s ar e bes t positione dt o commen t

o n particula r

^hedule s o r

aitLcarrier s an dtherefor e w e leaveJJios e specificareas-fo r th e community t o commen t

on . I respectfull y urg e USDO T t o support an dcontinu e th e EA S servic e at Chatha man dFunte r

Bay . Sincerely , Mar c LuiJc ^ Deput y Commissione r

o f Aviatio n cc : Le o vo n Scheben , Commissioner , DOT«&;P F

"Providing/o r

th e saf e movement

o f peopl e an dgood s an dth e delivery o f stat e services .
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

IN RE: )

)

CENTER FOR ADVANCED )

MANUFACTURING & TECHNOLOGY, )

a/k/a CAMTECH, )

)

Debtor )

)

CENTER FOR ADVANCED )

MANUFACTURING & TECHNOLOGY, )

a/k/a CAMTECH, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 05-297 Erie

)

REGIONAL CAREER AND )

TECHNICAL CENTER, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 2005, upon consideration of the Motion to

Dismiss Adversary Proceeding [Doc. No. 10] filed by the Plaintiff/Debtor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the above-captioned Adversary Proceeding against

Defendant Regional Career and Technical Center is DISMISSED. 

The clerk is directed to mark the case closed. 

s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: All parties of record. 

Case 1:05-cv-00297-SJM Document 11 Filed 12/28/05 Page 1 of 1
Order entered August 15 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00840 - CV RICK MILTEER, Appellant

V. PARK VENTURE ENDOSCO PY CENTER L.L.C. , ET AL. , Appellee s

On A ppeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 18 - 18465



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s August 14, 2019 motion for an extension of time to file the jurisdictional letter brief requested by this Court. W e GRANT the motion and extend the time to September 3, 2019

. /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
Searched for **http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/mutual%20accountability.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/mutual%20accountability.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-2592NE

_____________

Bernard Niewohner, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Nebraska.

*

First American Title Insurance * [UNPUBLISHED]

Company, *

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: February 24, 1999

Filed: March 9, 1999

_____________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Bernard Niewohner appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary

judgment in this diversity-based title insurance case. We review a grant of summary

judgment under a well-established standard. Because this is a diversity action, we

review de novo questions of state law. Having considered the record and the parties'

submissions, we are satisfied the district court correctly applied the law and the

record supports the district court's ruling. We also conclude a comprehensive opinion

in this diversity case would lack precedential value. We thus affirm on the basis of

the district court's ruling without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-3124

___________________________

Vickie Ann Wright

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Missouri

 ____________

 Submitted: April 11, 2023

Filed: April 20, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Vickie Wright appeals an order affirming the denial of disability insurance

benefits and supplemental security income. We agree substantial evidence in the
record as a whole supports the adverse decision and affirm.1

 See Kraus v. Saul, 988

F.3d 1019, 1023-24 (8th Cir. 2021) (standard of review).

Specifically, we find the administrative law judge (ALJ) properly discounted

Wright’s subjective complaints, and substantial evidence supported the ALJ’s

residual functional capacity (RFC) determination. See Whitman v. Colvin, 762 F.3d

701, 706 (8th Cir. 2014) (concluding ALJ properly considered claimant’s lack of

medical care in considering his allegations of debilitating symptoms); Krogmeier v.

Barnhart, 294 F.3d 1019, 1024 (8th Cir. 2002) (concluding substantial evidence

supported RFC determination based on medical records, medical opinions, and some

aspects of claimant’s testimony). We find the ALJ did not err in proceeding with

Wright’s hearing despite her pro se status, as Wright received written notice of her

right to representation and a list of organizations to contact regarding representation,

and as she acknowledged and waived the right to representation at the hearing. See

Wingert v. Bowen, 894 F.2d 296, 298 (8th Cir. 1990) (noting notice of hearing, which

explained right to counsel, and claimant’s reply indicating he wished to proceed

without counsel showed he was properly advised of and knowingly waived right). 

Finally, we find no merit to Wright’s contention that the district court was biased

against her. See Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994) (noting “judicial

rulings alone almost never constitute valid basis for a bias” finding).

The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

1The Honorable Abbie Crites-Leoni, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-