USA Banner
  U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Here's how you knowOfficial US Government Icon
              **Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
            Secure Site Icon
              **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
 U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation
 Search DOT
            Search
                    About FHWAFHWA Organization
                Headquarters Offices
                Field Offices
                Strategic Plan
                Business Opportunities
                Staff Directories
                Careers
                Highway History
                Contact UsProgramsAcquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                Safety
                Browse by TopicsResourcesCore Highway Topics
                Federal Aid Essentials
                Automation
                Complete Streets
                Laws and Regulations
                Policy & Guidance Center
                Section 508
                Publications and Statistics
                Professional Development
                National Highway Institute
                Resource Center
                Accessibility Resource Library
                FHWA Research LibraryNewsroomPress Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Photos
                Videos
                Media ContactsMenu FHWA Highway Safety Programs Home
                        Safety
                        Roadway Departure Safety
                        Reduce Crash Severity


            
            In This Section
        Roadway Departure Safety
                Strategic Approach
                                Strategic Plan
                Crash Emphasis Brochures
                Focused Approach
                Noteworthy Practices
                Partner Resources
                Keep Vehicles on the Road
                                Pavement Friction
                Horizontal Curve Safety
                Rumble Strips and Rumble Stripes
                Nighttime Visibility
                Provide for a Safe Recovery
                                SafetyEdge
                Clear Zones
                Reduce Crash Severity
                                Overview
                Hardware Eligibility Letters
                Focus on Reducing Rural Roadway Departures (FoRRRwD)
                                Overview
                All Public Roads
                Proven Countermeasures
                Systemic Approach
                Safety Action Plans
                FoRRRwD Resources
                
                Memorandum: Supplementary Guidance for the Selection of W-Beam Barrier Terminals
memo1105a.pdf (230.67 KB)
    
    
          **Subject:** ACTION: Supplementary Guidance for the Selection of W-Beam Barrier Terminals

**Date:** November 17, 2005

**From:** John R. Baxter, P.E., Director Office of Safety Design

**In Reply Refer To:** HSA-10

**To:** Safety Field

My October 26, 2004, memorandum, "Guideline for the Selection of W-beam Terminals", transmitted detailed information intended for use by roadway designers as an aid in selecting the most appropriate W-beam terminal for a specific site. The guidelines presented therein are currently being reviewed by members of the AASHTO Technical Committee for Roadside Safety for inclusion in the next edition of the AASHTO Roadside Design Guide(RDG). In the meantime, some have expressed a concern that the federal guideline safe misleading in the regard to the runout areas needed behind and beyond gating terminals. This memorandum provides additional information to assist designers in making appropriate barrier terminal selections.

Current terminal selection recommendations, both in the FHWA Guidelines and in the 2002 RDG, call for a minimum distance of 75' x 20' adjacent to the backside of the W-beam immediately downstream from the terminal end. This distance is clearly noted as being a minimum distance based on the final resting position of the 1800-lb small car in several W-beam terminal end-on tests (NCHRP Report 350 test 3-30). Given the greater weight and resultant impact severity of the 4400-lb pickup truck, it is obvious that a greater runout area would be needed for the truck impact at the same speed and angle (test 3-31). Several individual acceptance letters have specifically noted the distance traveled by the pickup truck in the certification tests and have recommended a minimum length of barrier to accommodate the observed post-crash trajectory.

To assist the designer in selecting an appropriate terminal at a specific site, I am attaching both a tabular and a graphic summary showing the distances traveled and the reported resting positions of both types of test vehicles in selected certification tests. These test data show the reported resting positions of both the small car and the pickup truck after the impacts into energy-absorbing designs (BEST, ET-series, SKT, and FLEAT) and non-energy absorbing designs (REGENT, SRT). As would be expected, in the end-on tests (3-30 and 3-31) the impacting vehicles traveled a greater distance behind the barrier after striking non-energy absorbing terminals. Also as expected, terminal type has little affect on a vehicle's post-crash travel distance when impacted at an angle(tests 3-32 and 3-33) because energy-absorbing terminals are most effective in limiting penetration behind the barrier in head-on crashes. Finally, as noted above, higher weight vehicles traveled further distances after impact.

The selection of an appropriate W-beam terminal must be a deliberate choice based on specific site conditions. At locations where:

flat angle impacts are possible and the terrain behind and adjacent to the barrier could allow a vehicle to reach the shielded hazard, or
	where the terrain behind and adjacent to the barrier in advance of the primary (shielded) area of concern is itself likely to cause serious occupant injuries in a crash.***either the barrier itself should be lengthened*** to lessen the likelihood that a vehicle behind the rail will reach the primary (or any secondary) fixed object or non-traversable terrain, or ***an energy-absorbing terminal should be considered***. Even in the latter instance, the recommended minimum runout area should be provided wherever practical.

Please discuss barrier terminal selection procedures with those in the State DOT responsible for this activity to ensure they are aware of current guidelines and are taking them into consideration in their terminal selection and installation decisions. States not already doing so should also be asked to investigate all fatal crashes involving barrier terminals to determine if the barrier length or terminal type/location may have contributed to the crash severity. In-service performance evaluation of all safety appurtenances is the only means available to verify the assumed crashworthiness of safety hardware based on limited certification tests and to identify unforeseen problems with hardware that need to be addressed.

Full Scale Crash Test Results for W-Beam Terminals

(Final Resting Position of Vehicle Shown for TL-3 Impact Condition)
	System Type / Name
			Test 3-30 820kg / 0 deg / offset W/4
			Test 3-31 2000kg / 0 deg / centered
			Test 3-32 820kg / 15 deg / centered
			Test 3-33 2000kg / 15 deg / centeredTangent BEST Energy Absorbing
			Lat. 8.8 m (28.9 ft) Long. 17.1 m (56.1 ft)
			Lat. 0.9 m (3.0 ft) Long. 8.9 m (29.2 ft)
			Lat. 13.2 m (43.3 ft) Long. 21.7 m (71.2 ft)
			Lat. 21.3 m (69.9 ft) Long. 36.6m (120 ft)Tangent ET 2000 Energy Absorbing
			Lat. 1.7 m (5.6 ft) Long. 6.3 m (20.7 ft)
			Lat. 2.0 m (6.6 ft) Long. 7.62 m (25.0 ft)
			Lat. 4.6 m (15.1 ft) Long. 17.1 m (56.1 ft)
			Lat. 36.6 m (120 ft) Long. 107.9 m (354 ft)Lat. 0.0 m (0.0 ft) Long. 12.0 m (39.4 ft)Tangent SKT Energy Absorbing
			Lat. 5.0 m (16.4 ft) Long. 10 m (32.8 ft)
			Lat. 0.0 m (0.0 ft) Long. 15.2 m (49.9 ft)
			Lat. 2.0 m (6.6 ft) Long. 37.0 m (121 ft)
			Lat. 35 m (115 ft) Long. 90 m (295 ft)Lat. 5.7 m (18.7 ft) Long. 8.5 m (27.9 ft)
			Lat. 0.0 m (0.0 ft) Long. 17.5 m (57.4 ft)Flared FLEAT Energy Absorbing
			Lat. 0.0 m (0.0 ft) Long. 5.5 m (18.0 ft)
			Lat. 1.7 m (5.6 ft) **Long. 32.0 m (105 ft)
			Did Not Conduct
			Did Not ConductLat. 1.6 m (5.3 ft) Long. 9.7 m (31.8 ft)Flared REGENT Non-Energy Absorbing
			Lat. 3.0 m (9.8 ft) Long. 19.0 m (62.3 ft)
			Lat. 1.0 m (3.3 ft) Long. 44.0 m (144 ft)
			Did Not Conduct
			Did Not ConductLat. 1.5 m (4.9 ft) Long. 29.5 m (96.8 ft)
			Lat. 4.6 m (15.1 ft) Long. 77.2 m (253 ft)Flared SRT Non-Energy Absorbing
			Numbers Were Not Reported
			Lat. 5.2 m (17.1 ft) Long. 41.8 m (137 ft)
			Did Not Conduct
			Did Not ConductLat. Not Reported Long. Past the 53.3 m (175 ft) test installation** The FLEAT 3-31 Long. 32.0 m (105 ft) value is from a test involving the impact head deforming sufficiently to block the rail outlet. The rail kinking stopped after only about 1.5 m (5 ft). When the impact head was further reinforced to prevent this behavior the vehicle stopped about 1/3 the distance.

Post Impact Vehicle Trajectories

**Shown are Final Resting Positions for Various NCHRP 350 Roadside Terminals)**

"This is a very complex chart showing the information from the above table in a graphic."



Page last modified on February 17, 2017 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Highway Administration**

1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE

WASHINGTON, DC 20590

202-366-4000Subscribe to email updates
                    About
  

        
              About FHWA
                Careers
                Org Chart
                Staff Directories
                Work with UsPrograms
  

        
              Acquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                SafetyPolicies, Rights, Legal
  

        
              About DOT
                Accessibility
                Budget and Performance
                Civil Rights
                FOIA
                Information Quality
                No FEAR Act
                Office of Inspector General
                Privacy Policy
                USA.gov
                Web Policies and Notices
                Web StandardsNews & Events
  

        
              Newsroom
                Press Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Media Contacts
                Connect with Us