Page 1 of 39

OKLAHOMA

2019 ANNUAL REPORT
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 2 of 39

Table of Contents

Table of Contents.................................................................................................................................. 2

Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................................. 3

Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4

Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5

Program Structure................................................................................................................................. 5

Program Administration..................................................................................................................... 5

Program Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 6

Project Implementation .......................................................................................................................13

Funds Programmed.........................................................................................................................13

General Listing of Projects ..............................................................................................................15

Safety Performance ............................................................................................................................22

General Highway Safety Trends......................................................................................................22

Safety Performance Targets............................................................................................................27

Applicability of Special Rules...........................................................................................................29

Evaluation ...........................................................................................................................................30

Program Effectiveness ....................................................................................................................30

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements .......................................................30

Project Effectiveness.......................................................................................................................34

Compliance Assessment.....................................................................................................................35
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 3 of 39

Disclaimer

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section[HSIP], shall not be subject 

to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other 

purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed 

in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data.”

23 U.S.C. 409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, 

or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety 

enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway 

crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any 

highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid 

highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court 

proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence 

at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.”
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 4 of 39

Executive Summary

ODOT obligated $48.6 million in HSIP funds for FFY2018. 65 percent of HSIP funds were obligated for bridge 

projects, followed by 7.5 percent on cable barrier, 7.4 percent on ADA compliance, 6.5 percent on Horizontal 

Curves, and 6.0 percent on striping. Remaining funds were obligated for rumble strips, intersection 

improvements, guardrail replacement, ITS operations and infrastructure, signing, and pedestrian 

improvements.
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 5 of 39

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of 

achieving a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 

148(h) and 23 CFR 924.15, States are required to report annually on the progress being made to 

advance HSIP implementation and evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the 

HSIP Reporting Guidance dated December 29, 2016 and consists of five sections: program structure, 

progress in implementing highway safety improvement projects, progress in achieving safety 

outcomes and performance targets, effectiveness of the improvements and compliance assessment.

Program Structure

Program Administration

Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. 

HSIP funding is distributed among field offices and the central Traffic Division office. Safety infrastructure 

programs using HSIP funds administered by Traffic Engineering Division constitute a minority of HSIP funds 

allocated.

Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? 

 Engineering

How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? 

• Other-Central Office

Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP. 

Local road projects do not currently use HSIP funds.

Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) 

Bureaus, Divisions) are involved with HSIP planning. 

• Design

• Districts/Regions

• Traffic Engineering/Safety

Describe coordination with internal partners. 

The majority of HSIP funds are not allocated to the Division (Traffic) which is responsible for preparing this 

report. This report applies primarily to those funds which are allocated to Traffic Division. Traffic Division is not 

able to report on the administrative practices relevant to the remainder of the HSIP spending. The Traffic 

Division provides field offices with an annual Crash Digest, which can be used for selecting optimal safety 

project locations.
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 6 of 39

Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning. 

• Other-None

Describe coordination with external partners. 

Coordination with external partners does not involve use of HSIP funds at this time.

Program Methodology

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP. 

• Horizontal Curve

• Intersection

• Median Barrier

• Roadway Departure

• Sign Replacement And Improvement

• Other-Striping

Program: Horizontal Curve

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2018

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Other-run off road injury/fatal Traffic 

Lane miles 

Horizontal curvature 

Roadside features 

Other-Shoulder Width 

Other-Speed Limit 

Other-Design Speed 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Excess expected crash frequency with the EB adjustment

• Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

• Probability of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

No
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 7 of 39

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Ranking based on B/C:3

Available funding:4

Incremental B/C:5

Ranking based on net benefit:1

Cost Effectiveness:2

Program: Intersection

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Other-Angle Crashes 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 8 of 39

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Other-Crash Frequency:1

Program: Median Barrier

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Other-Crossover Crashes Traffic 

Lane miles 

Median width 

Other-Access Control 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

• Other-Crash Severity Prediction Function

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 9 of 39

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Ranking based on B/C:1

Program: Roadway Departure

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Other-run off road injury/fatal Traffic 

Lane miles 

Roadside features 

Other-terrain type 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Ranking based on B/C:1
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 10 of 39

Program: Sign Replacement And Improvement

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• Other-Safety Infrastructure

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Other-None 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Other-District Selection

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Other-District Selection

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Other-District Selection:1

Program: Other-Striping

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 11 of 39

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Other-option of field districts

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

What percentage of HSIP funds address systemic improvements? 

 5.62

 HSIP funds are used to address which of the following systemic improvements? 

• Cable Median Barriers

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? 

• Crash data analysis

• Data-driven safety analysis tools (HSM, CMF Clearinghouse, SafetyAnalyst, usRAP)

• Engineering Study

• Road Safety Assessment

• SHSP/Local road safety plan

• Stakeholder input

Does the State HSIP consider connected vehicles and ITS technologies? 

No

Does the State use the Highway Safety Manual to support HSIP efforts? 

Yes
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 12 of 39

Please describe how the State uses the HSM to support HSIP efforts. 

HSM predictive method is used to evaluate potential benefits of projects.

Describe other aspects of the HSIP methodology on which the State would like to 

elaborate. 

Most HSIP projects created by Traffic Division are systemic. Predictive methods are used to prioritize locations 

for treatment where practicable, otherwise crash frequency is used. Predictive methods have been used in one 

case (median cable barrier) as a way of indirectly prioritizing one program in comparison to others. Predictive 

methods are also used to help identify hot spot locations and (outside of Traffic Division) to prioritize locations 

for treatment. The core metric for prioritization is benefit/cost ratio, either explicitly or through some metric that 

is an approximate surrogate.
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 13 of 39

Project Implementation

Funds Programmed

Reporting period for HSIP funding. 

Federal Fiscal Year

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category. 

FUNDING CATEGORY PROGRAMMED OBLIGATED % 

OBLIGATED/PROGRAMMED

HSIP (23 U.S.C. 148) $48,623,968 $38,721,795 79.64%

HRRR Special Rule (23 

U.S.C. 148(g)(1))

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

154)

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

164)

$13,979,118 $14,017,548 100.27%

RHCP (for HSIP 

purposes) (23 U.S.C. 

130(e)(2))

$0 $0 0%

Other Federal-aid Funds 

(i.e. STBG, NHPP)

$0 $237,261,382 0%

State and Local Funds $71,246,298 $174,350,377 244.71%

Totals $133,849,384 $464,351,102 346.92%

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) or tribal 

safety projects?

0%

How much funding is obligated to local or tribal safety projects? 

0%

Local government safety projects are funded through STP.

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

$600,000

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

$600,000

Funding was spent on ITS Operations.
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 14 of 39

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas 

during the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126? 

0%

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during 

the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126? 

0%

Discuss impediments to obligating HSIP funds and plans to overcome this challenge in 

the future. 

Funds are obligated at a level above Traffic Engineering's influence. There are no plans to overcome this 

challenge in the future.
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 15 of 39

General Listing of Projects

List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period. 

PROJEC

T NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3325104 Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection traffic control - other 1 Intersection

s

$258541 $323177 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther10,60

0

65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Traffic Signals

2700507 Lighting Intersection lighting 1 Intersection

s

$124744 $124744 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther3,800 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown Intersection

s

None

3336004 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

31.77 Miles $439510 $439510 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

2883408 Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection signing - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

2 Intersection

s

$1780815 $1780815 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,600 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown Intersection

s

Signing

3325404 Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection traffic control - other 1 Intersection

s

$209250 $261564 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther19,30

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Traffic Signals

3296704 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

1 Locations $85895 $85895 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,900 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility None ADA 

Compliance

3296604 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

1 Locations $351250 $351250 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,800 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility None ADA 

Compliance

3360604 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Pedestrian signal - Pedestrian 

Hybrid Beacon

0.63 Miles $150629 $167367 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 16,00

0

35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Pedestrians Pedestrian 

Hybrid Beacon

3347904 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

1 Locations $22442 $24937 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,000 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Request None School Zone

3294704 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

1 Locations $886094 $886094 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,400 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility None ADA 

Compliance

3309504 Roadside Barrier - cable 5 Miles $1173664 $1173664 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 17,80

0

65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3370404 Roadway Rumble strips - center 46.6 Miles $942400 $942400 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Other Lane 

Departure

CLRS
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 16 of 39

PROJEC

T NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

2896104 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Bridge $9774760 $9774760 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate18,70

0

70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown None Bridge Projects

3079304 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

1 Locations $61841 $77301 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther22,60

0

35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Request None School Zone

2976004 Roadside Roadside - other 3.5 Miles $2149255 $2686567 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther20,30

0

65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Cable 

Barrier/Other

3373104 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

1 Division $114200 $114200 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

2190904 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Bridge $77682 $1577682 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 5,000 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown None Bridge Projects

2191804 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Bridge $36874 $2536874 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 4,100 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown None Bridge Projects

2317009 Roadside Barrier- metal 3 Locations $252406 $315508 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther16,50

0

50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Guardrail 

Replacement

2394504 Railroad grade 

crossings

Railroad grade crossing gates 1 Locations $137327 $169943 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Local Road or 

Street

300 30 Railroad Unknown None Railroad 

Crossing

2413204 Alignment Horizontal curve realignment 1 Locations $3155708 $3944635 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,100 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown Roadway 

Departure

Horizontal 

Curve

2432307 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Bridge $12221080 $15276351 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,400 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown None Bridge Projects

2555214 Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

Advanced technology and ITS - 

other

1 Operation $600000 $1300000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

N/A 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown None ITS Operations

2634804 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Bridge $77399 $1151718 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Collector 2,000 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown None Bridge Projects

2647504 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Intersection

s

$7389.67 $1436377 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther23,80

0

40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Intersection 

Modification

2700408 Railroad grade 

crossings

Upgrade railroad crossing 

signal

1 Locations $44709 $55886 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate40,70

0

70 Railroad Unknown None Railroad 

Crossing
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 17 of 39

PROJEC

T NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

2704504 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Bridge $64913 $3865174.1

9

HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 460 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown None Bridge Projects

2707404 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Bridge $511020 $3929051 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,400 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown None Bridge Projects

2792504 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Bridge $17938.79 $7393733.7

9

HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,700 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown None Bridge Projects

2882804 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Bridge $9005802.0

7

$18249989.

4

HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,000 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown None Bridge Projects

2896704 Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - extend existing 

left-turn lane

1.542 Miles $783139 $978923 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther19,30

0

65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown Intersection

s

Turn Lanes

2907607 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Bridge $133320 $166650 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

36,60

0

65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown None Bridge Projects

2919104 Roadside Barrier - cable 2 Locations $-225851.89 $565862 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate20,50

0

65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

30730 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal - add 

backplates with retroreflective 

borders

6 Divisions $-212396.63 $1520709 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Retroreflective 

Backplates

3073704 Roadside Barrier - other 1 Division $-85065.43 $1686889 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Guardrail/Cabl

e Barrier

3078704 Roadside Barrier - cable 14 Miles $-928882 $3209500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther19,99

0

70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3078804 Roadside Barrier - cable 5 Miles $127.18 $719537 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther9,300 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3085104 Roadside Barrier - other 5 Locations $33770 $1687278 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Guardrail/Cabl

e Barrier

3110504 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

45.26 Miles $-311.5 $660747 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3132504 Roadside Barrier - cable 2 Miles $-24560.37 $254497 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate39,20

0

70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 18 of 39

PROJEC

T NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3148904 Roadside Barrier - other 20 Miles $-44876.32 $698379 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther4,000 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Guardrail/Cabl

e Barrier

3155804 Roadside Barrier - cable 7.08 Miles $-10355.42 $1706388 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate35,70

0

70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3160304 Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

Advanced technology and ITS - 

other

223.67 Miles $289792 $816661 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown None ITS 

Infrastructure

3164504 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

8.44 Miles $1824.08 $110425 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3238404 Roadside Barrier end treatments (crash 

cushions, terminals)

12 Approaches $-52873.38 $220875 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Principal ArterialInterstate0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Impact 

Attenuators

3240404 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Intersection

s

$-181.21 $232149 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 28,30

0

50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Intersection 

Modification

3243004 Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

"when flashing" warning signmounted

2 Intersection

s

$3950 $111477 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 18,30

0

65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Flashing 

Signing

3248404 Roadside Barrier- metal 22.15 Miles $20373 $2671454 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther16,30

0

70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Guardrail 

Replacement

3248504 Roadside Barrier - cable 2.3 Miles $136824 $790771 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

36,40

0

60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3256305 Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1.628 Miles $137267 $914109 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther11,80

0

35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Request Intersection

s

Intersection 

Modification

3258804 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

1 Locations $-3236.21 $22446 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther5,700 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Request None School Zone

3262504 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

36.73 Miles $-1628925 $3285108 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate91,70

0

70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown None Signing

32663 Roadway Rumble strips - center 150 Miles $-144025.27 $1059507 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther2,900 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Other Lane 

Departure

Centerline 

Rumble Strips

3266404 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

11.58 Miles $-27160.65 $153618 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate38,00

0

70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 19 of 39

PROJEC

T NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3274504 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

1.01 Miles $1033962 $1033962 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther6,800 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility None ADA 

Compliance

3274604 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

0.5 Miles $-9837 $748000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 8,700 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility None ADA 

Compliance

3279604 Roadway Rumble strips - center 8.9 Miles $-5067.6 $77911 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,600 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

Centerline 

Rumble Strips

32797 Roadway Rumble strips - center 1 Division $3936.91 $180342 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

Centerline 

Rumble Strips

3280004 Roadway Rumble strips - center 7.42 Miles $-3437.71 $31941 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther6,200 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

Centerline 

Rumble Strips

3280104 Roadway Rumble strips - center 20 Miles $566.18 $94976 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

Centerline 

Rumble Strips

3288004 Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection traffic control - other 1 Intersection

s

$-3322.75 $165497 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 13,40

0

55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersection

s

Traffic Signals

3290504 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

1 Miles $182731 $182731 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 6,400 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility None ADA 

Compliance

3293404 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

1.95 Miles $-5788 $508445 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 13,30

0

30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility None ADA 

Compliance

3293504 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

0.51 Miles $178835 $178835 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther5,700 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility None ADA 

Compliance

3293804 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

0.25 Miles $82648 $82648 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther13,40

0

30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility None ADA 

Compliance

3294004 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

0.8 Miles $260674 $260674 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,500 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility None ADA 

Compliance

3295204 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

0.6 Miles $592556 $592556 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther22,00

0

40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility None ADA 

Compliance

3307604 Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - modify 

existing

1 Intersection

s

$-4173.03 $42402 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 4,500 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown Intersection

s

Intersection 

Modification
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 20 of 39

PROJEC

T NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3307804 Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection traffic control - other 1 Intersection

s

$-74836 $176904 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther10,60

0

25 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown Intersection

s

Traffic Signals

3309404 Roadside Barrier - cable 2.81 Miles $-179027 $254206 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther9,800 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3315104 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

0.2 Miles $23887.65 $94940 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,300 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Request None School Zone

3315904 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Pedestrian signal - Pedestrian 

Hybrid Beacon

0.2 Miles $-40459 $153929 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther6,500 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility None ADA 

Compliance

3319404 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

1 Division $-8976.9 $441024 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3324904 Roadside Barrier - other 1 Division $173944 $2284952 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Guardrail/Cabl

e Barrier

3325204 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

1 Division $-715978 $610513.92 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown None Signing

3325304 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

0.32 Miles $2483 $24466 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,700 State 

Highway 

Agency

Request None School Zones

3325504 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

1 Division $-142822 $350980.48 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3329304 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

1 Division $-8521 $0 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3329404 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

1 Division $-252319.85 $28.54 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3329504 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

2.2 Miles $-14014 $7070 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,500 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3329604 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

8.6 Miles $-18442 $63730 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,300 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3329704 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

5.3 Miles $-27071 $23566 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther3,800 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 21 of 39

PROJEC

T NAME

IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPUT 

TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AADT SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3329804 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

1 Division $-404153 $223613.64 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3330204 Roadside Barrier- metal 1 Division $239810 $451793.51 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

Guardrail 

Replacement

3348004 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

1 Division $517770 $1502770 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3348704 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

1 Statewide $50000 $50000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Request None School Zones

3360704 Roadside Barrier - cable 8 Miles $1557775 $1557775 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3370304 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs and traffic 

control - other

0.5 Miles $22912 $25458 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,500 25 State 

Highway 

Agency

Request None School Zones

3370404 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

1 Division $942400 $942400 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3373104 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

1 Division $114200 $114200 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3373204 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

1 Division $372900 $372900 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3385104 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - remarking

1 Division $1301000 $1301000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varie

s

Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 22 of 39

Safety Performance

General Highway Safety Trends

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the State for the past five 

years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Fatalities 668 696 709 678 669 645 687 657 678

Serious Injuries 3,679 3,598 3,502 3,072 3,042 2,826 2,788 2,646 3,046

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT)

1.400 1.470 1.480 1.410 1.400 1.350 1.400 1.330 1.410

Serious injury rate (per 

HMVMT)

7.710 7.580 7.340 6.400 6.380 5.920 5.700 5.360 6.350

Number non-motorized 

fatalities

78 53 73 74 56 78 96 89 75

Number of nonmotorized serious 

injuries

188 207 192 192 183 225 212 195 200
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 23 of 39

600

620

640

660

680

700

720

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Annual Fatalities

Fatalities 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Annual Serious Injuries

Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 24 of 39

1.25

1.3

1.35

1.4

1.45

1.5

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Fatality rate (per HMVMT)

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 25 of 39

Describe fatality data source. 

State Motor Vehicle Crash Database

To the maximum extent possible, present this data by functional classification and 

ownership. 

Year 2018

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

 (5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

 (5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Interstate

42.8 119.8 0.81 2.29

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

0 0.6

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other

80.2 207 1.56 4.03

Rural Minor Arterial 84.6 198.4 2.89 6.78

Rural Minor Collector 3 10.2 1.71 5.88

Rural Major Collector 134 403 2.42 7.27

Rural Local Road or 

Street

57.4 234.8 2.25 9.29

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Non Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Fatalities Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 26 of 39

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

 (5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

 (5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Interstate

44.4 186.6 0.79 3.35

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

22 104.8 0.7 3.34

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other

66.8 478.8 1.16 8.29

Urban Minor Arterial 49.2 386.2 0.97 7.65

Urban Minor Collector 0 1.4 0 1.52

Urban Major Collector 18.2 118 1.21 7.88

Urban Local Road or 

Street

41 248.4 0.96 5.52
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 27 of 39

Year 2018

Roadways Number of Fatalities

 (5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

 (5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

State Highway 

Agency

282.8 1,051.2 1.08 4.03

County Highway 

Agency

Town or Township 

Highway Agency

City or Municipal 

Highway Agency

State Park, Forest, or 

Reservation Agency

Local Park, Forest or 

Reservation Agency

Other State Agency

Other Local Agency 229.4 1,310.6

Private (Other than 

Railroad)

Railroad

State Toll Authority 135.2 353.2

Local Toll Authority

Other Public 

Instrumentality (e.g. 

Airport, School, 

University)

Indian Tribe Nation

Urban or rural classification was based on Urban Area Type. For local roads, county roads are considered rural 

and city streets are considered urban. 2018 data are preliminary.

Safety Performance Targets

Safety Performance Targets 

Calendar Year 2020 Targets *

Number of Fatalities:662.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 28 of 39

This target was set by the Highway Safety Office using an ARIMA model. It predicts that the recent 

decrease can be sustained.

Number of Serious Injuries:2465.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

This target was set by the Highway Safety Office using an ARIMA model. It predicts that the decrease 

can be sustained.

Fatality Rate:1.320

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

This target was set by the Highway Safety Office using an ARIMA model. It predicts that the recent 

decrease can be sustained.

Serious Injury Rate:5.140

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

This target was calculated by using an ARIMA model. It predicts that the decrease can be sustained.

Total Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries:281.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

This target was calculated by using an ARIMA model. It predicts a limit to an increasing trend.

Describe efforts to coordinate with other stakeholders (e.g. MPOs, SHSO) to establish 

safety performance targets. 

ODOT has met regularly with HSO to discuss goal setting methodology.

Does the State want to report additional optional targets? 

No

Describe progress toward meeting the State’s 2018 Safety Performance Targets (based 

on data available at the time of reporting). For each target, include a discussion of any 

reasons for differences in the actual outcomes and targets. 

For fatalities and fatality rate, the state met the 2018 Safety Performance Targets. For the remaining targets, 

due to the change in Suspected Serious Injury reporting, the state met the targets. However it should be noted 

that due to the change, the state expects to have an unpredictable variation in outcomes involving suspected 

serious injuries.
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 29 of 39

Applicability of Special Rules

Does the HRRR special rule apply to the State for this reporting period? 

No 

Provide the number of older driver and pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries 65 

years of age and older for the past seven years. 

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Fatalities

88 97 103 98 84 98 100

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Serious 

Injuries

238 222 189 223 222 194 208

Data is from the State Collision Database and reflects the number of fatalities and suspected serious injuries 

for drivers and pedestrians 65 or older.
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 30 of 39

Evaluation

Program Effectiveness

How does the State measure effectiveness of the HSIP? 

• Benefit/Cost Ratio

• Change in fatalities and serious injuries

There is no measure for the HSIP as a whole. Specific projects and programs may be evaluated by 

Benefit/Cost ratio or by reductions in targeted crash types.

Based on the measures of effectiveness selected previously, describe the results of 

the State's program level evaluations. 

Median Cable Barrier: Crossover crashes with death or severe injury on access controlled state highways 

(where most of the median cable barrier has been installed) declined from an average of 34.4 per year from 

2002-2006 (the last period before significant construction began) to an average of 7.6 per year from 2012-

2016.

High Friction Surface Treatment: Empirical Bayes before and after studies have suggested a statistically 

significant decrease in KAB collisions for the pilot sites. 

Systemic Intersection Improvements: A naive before and after analysis showed a statistically significant 

decrease in KAB collisions at a 95 % confidence interval.

Crash data are insufficient for evaluation, or cannot be isolated, for signal backplate upgrades, centerline 

rumble strip, guardrail upgrades, ITS installations, bridge upgrades, ADA compliance, School Zones, and 

district signing and striping.

What other indicators of success does the State use to demonstrate effectiveness and 

success of the Highway Safety Improvement Program? 

• # miles improved by HSIP

• Increased awareness of safety and data-driven process 

• More systemic programs

• Policy change

Miles of improvement has been used for median cable barrier. Recent systemic programs include intersection 

sign and marking improvement, retroreflective backplate upgrades, curve delineation, centerline rumble strip, 

and high friction surface treatment. The introduction of centerline rumble strips represents a policy change.

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements

Present and describe trends in SHSP emphasis area performance measures. 

Year 2018
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 31 of 39

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted Crash 

Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury 

Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Lane Departure Exclude 

intersection, 

head-on, 

sideswipe, fixed 

object, rollover

305.4 877 0.59 1.72

Roadway Departure Roadway 

Departure > 0

469 1,513 0.99 3.16

Intersections Intersections 143.8 989 0.31 2.05

Pedestrians Unit Type = P 68.4 144.2 0.14 0.3

Bicyclists Unit Type = B 7.6 40.6 0.01 0.08

Older Drivers Driver=Y, 

Age>=65

81.6 205 0.17 0.43

Motorcyclists Unit Type=D, 

Vehicle Type=15

77.4 305.4 0.17 0.64

Work Zones Special 

Feature=5

14.6 58 0.03 0.12
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 32 of 39

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 33 of 39

2018 data are preliminary. Data provided by the State Crash Database.

Has the State completed any countermeasure effectiveness evaluations during the 

reporting period? 

No

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 34 of 39

Project Effectiveness

Provide the following information for previously implemented projects that the State evaluated this reporting period. 
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 35 of 39

Compliance Assessment

What date was the State’s current SHSP approved by the Governor or designated State representative? 

 04/27/2018

What are the years being covered by the current SHSP? 

From: 2018 To: 2023

When does the State anticipate completing it’s next SHSP update?

 2020

Provide the current status (percent complete) of MIRE fundamental data elements collection efforts using the table below. 

ROAD TYPE MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

ROADWAY SEGMENT Segment Identifier 

(12)

100 100 100 100 100 100

Route Number (8) 100

Route/Street Name 

(9)

100 100

Federal Aid/Route 

Type (21)

100 100

Rural/Urban 

Designation (20)

100 100 100 100

Surface Type (23) 100 100 100 100

Begin Point 

Segment Descriptor 

(10)

100 100 100 100 100 100

End Point Segment 

Descriptor (11)

100 100 100 100 100 100

Segment Length 

(13)

100 100

Direction of 

Inventory (18)

100 100

Functional Class 

(19)

100 100 100 100 100 100

Median Type (54) 100 100

Access Control (22) 100 100

One/Two Way 

Operations (91)

100 100
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 36 of 39

ROAD TYPE MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Number of Through 

Lanes (31)

100 100 100 100

Average Annual 

Daily Traffic (79)

100 100 100 100

AADT Year (80) 100 100

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4)

100 100 100 100 100 100

INTERSECTION Unique Junction 

Identifier (120)

5

Location Identifier 

for Road 1 Crossing 

Point (122)

5

Location Identifier 

for Road 2 Crossing 

Point (123)

5

Intersection/Junction 

Geometry (126)

5

Intersection/Junction 

Traffic Control (131)

5

AADT for Each 

Intersecting Road 

(79)

100 100

AADT Year (80) 100 100

Unique Approach 

Identifier (139)

5

INTERCHANGE/RAMP Unique Interchange 

Identifier (178)

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (197)

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

Ending Ramp 

Terminal (201)

Ramp Length (187) 100 100
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 37 of 39

ROAD TYPE MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Roadway Type at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (195)

Roadway Type at 

End Ramp Terminal 

(199)

Interchange Type 

(182)

Ramp AADT (191) 100 100

Year of Ramp AADT 

(192)

100 100

Functional Class 

(19)

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4)

100 100

Totals (Average Percent Complete): 100.00 94.44 28.75 25.00 36.36 36.36 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

*Based on Functional Classification

Describe actions the State will take moving forward to meet the requirement to have complete access to the MIRE fundamental data elements on all public roads by September 30, 2026. 

ODOT intends to implement the MIRE implementation plan and data collection is underway.

Did the State conduct an HSIP program assessment during the reporting period? 

No

When does the State plan to complete its next HSIP program assessment.

2020
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 38 of 39

Optional Attachments

Program Structure:

Project Implementation:

Safety Performance:

Evaluation:

Compliance Assessment:
2019 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 39 of 39

Glossary

5 year rolling average: means the average of five individuals, consecutive annual points of data 

(e.g. annual fatality rate).

Emphasis area: means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process.

Highway safety improvement project: means strategies, activities and projects on a public road 

that are consistent with a State strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous 

road location or feature or addresses a highway safety problem.

HMVMT: means hundred million vehicle miles traveled.

Non-infrastructure projects: are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of noninfrastructure projects include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, 

improvements in the collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement 

activities.

Older driver special rule: applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and 

pedestrians over the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which 

data are available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance 

dated February 13, 2013.

Performance measure: means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to 

monitor changes in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and 

objectives.

Programmed funds: mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects.

Roadway Functional Classification: means the process by which streets and highways are 

grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP): means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on 

safety data developed by a State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148.

Systematic: refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across 

a system.

Systemic safety improvement: means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high 

risk roadway features that are correlated with specific severe crash types.

Transfer: means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal 

year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.