Memorandum

Subject: ACTION: 23 U.S.C. 148(g) Highway 

Safety Improvement Program Special 

Rules Guidance 

Date: February 2, 2022

 

From: Cheryl J. Walker In Reply Refer To:

Associate Administrator, Office of Safety HSA-1 

 

To: Division Administrators

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) (Pub. L. 117-58, also known as the 

“Bipartisan Infrastructure Law” (BIL)), was signed into law on November 15, 2021. Among 

other things, the BIL established a new Special Rule under the Highway Safety Improvement 

Program (HSIP) for vulnerable road user (VRU) safety and continued the two existing special 

rules for High-Risk Rural Roads (HRRR) and Older Drivers and Pedestrians without change. 

The VRU Special Rule is part of a larger focus on non-motorist safety that includes a new

requirement for States to complete VRU safety assessments. 

This memorandum provides guidance to support implementation of the three Special Rules in 

section 148(g) of title 23 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) as part of the HSIP:

• HRRR Special Rule (23 U.S.C. 148(g)(1)); 

• Older Drivers and Pedestrians Special Rule (23 U.S.C. 148(g)(2)); and

• VRU Safety Special Rule (23 U.S.C. 148(g)(3)). 

For each Special Rule, the guidance includes the statutory reference, purpose, definitions, a 

description of how FHWA will determine if the special rule applies, and a description of how 

States should implement each Special Rule. This guidance replaces guidance FHWA issued on 

December 27, 2012, related to the HRRR Special Rule and on February 13, 2013 and May 19, 

2016, related to the Older Drivers and Pedestrians Special Rule.

FHWA also issued guidance on December 16, 2021 (“Policy on Using Bipartisan Infrastructure 

Law Resources to Build a Better America,” hereafter “Policy”) that serves as an overarching 

framework to prioritize the use of BIL resources on projects that will Build a Better America. 

That Policy is available on FHWA’s BIL implementation website at the following URL: 

https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bipartisan-infrastructure-law/docs/building_a_better_americapolicy_framework.pdf. 

Except where required by statute or regulations, the contents of this document do not have the 

force and effect of law and are not meant to bind States in any way. This document is intended 

only to provide clarity to States regarding existing requirements under the law or agency 
2 

policies. While this is non-binding guidance, compliance with applicable statutes or regulations 

cited is required.

High-Risk Rural Roads (HRRR) Special Rule 

Guidance

Statutory Reference

The HRRR Special Rule at 23 U.S.C. 148(g)(1) provides: "If the fatality rate on rural roads in a 

State increases over the most recent 2-year period for which data are available, that State shall be 

required to obligate in the next fiscal year for projects on high risk rural roads an amount equal to 

at least 200 percent of the amount of funds the State received for fiscal year 2009 for high risk 

rural roads under subsection (f) of this section, as in effect on the day before the date of 

enactment of the MAP-21." 

Purpose

The purpose of this section of the guidance is to clarify: A) how to interpret the definition of 

HRRR in a State; B) how FHWA will determine if the Special Rule applies to a State; and C) 

how a State should implement the HRRR Special Rule. 

Definition 

The definition of high risk rural road is provided in 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(1) as: “any roadway 

functionally classified as a rural major or minor collector or a rural local road with significant 

safety risks, as defined by a State in accordance with an updated State strategic highway safety 

plan.” 

The definition of a HRRR provides flexibility to States in determining their HRRRs. The 

definition of a HRRR is limited to the same functional classifications as under the Safe, 

Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) Pub. 

L. 109-59), of rural major and minor collectors and rural local roads. However, only the roads 

within those functional classifications "with significant safety risks" will become the roadways 

designated as HRRRs. 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(1) requires that States define the significant safety risks 

of these functionally classified roads in accordance with their updated State Strategic Highway 

Safety Plans (SHSPs).

To determine what a "significant safety risk" is, States may develop their own methodologies in 

accordance with their updated SHSPs for the specified roadway functional classifications. Some 

examples of definitions for "significant safety risk" are provided below and may be used 

singularly or in combination: 

1. Continue to use the SAFETEA-LU definition: Roadways with a fatality rate that is higher 

than roadways of similar functional classifications in that State. For instance, a roadway 

with a fatality rate 10 percent higher than roads with a similar classification in that State. 

Alternatively, a State may use crash rates resulting in fatalities and serious injuries.
3 

2. Use roadways with a crash frequency above a designated threshold, which eliminates the 

comparison calculation to other roadways.

3. Define high-risk rural roadway characteristics that are correlated with specific severe 

crash types, such as cross-section width, lack of shoulders, substandard alignment, 

hazardous roadside, etc.

4. Use information gathered through means such as field reviews, safety assessments, road 

safety audits, and local knowledge and experience. Using information from observations 

in the field can identify high-risk locations that may not be identified through data 

analysis or by identifying roadway characteristics.

FHWA Determination of Whether the HRRR Special Rule Applies

If the fatality rate on rural roads in a State increases over the most recent 2-year period for which 

data are available, then the HRRR Special Rule applies. (23 U.S.C. 148(g)(1)). The FHWA will 

use the fatality rate per 100 million vehicle miles traveled (100 MVMT) for roads in the State 

classified as rural major and minor collectors and rural local roads. The FHWA will use the 

Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) data and Highway Performance Monitoring System 

(HPMS) data to calculate the fatality rate.

Consistent with other safety performance measures, FHWA uses a 5-year rolling average for the 

fatality rate. This approach provides a balance between the stability of the data (by averaging 

multiple years) and providing an accurate trend of the data (by minimizing how far back in time 

to consider data). The table below shows the relationship of the annual fatality rates of available 

data to the fiscal year for which the Special Rule would apply. 

Table: Timeline of HRRR Special Rule Determination

5-year averages

to compare

FHWA Notifies State DOT if

HRRR Special Rule Applies

Fiscal Year that HRRR Special

Rule would apply

2014-2018 

to

2016-2020 

By March 2022 FY 2023

Oct. 1, 2022 to Sept. 30, 2023

2015-2019 

to

2017-2021 

By March 2023 FY 2024

Oct. 1, 2023 to Sept. 30, 2024

2016-2020 

to

2018-2022 

March 2024 FY 2025

Oct. 1, 2024 to Sept. 30, 2025

2017-2021 

to

2019-2023 

March 2025 FY 2026 

Oct. 1, 2025 to Sept. 30, 2026 

This process would continue each year.

Specifically, the FHWA will— 
4 

• Calculate fatality rates for the two 5-year periods using FARS and HPMS. 

• Calculate the difference between the two 5-year average fatality rates. 

• Round the difference to the nearest hundredth. If the rounded difference results in an 

increase of 0.01 or greater, then the HRRR Special Rule applies. 

For example:

The State of Lincoln's 5-year average fatality rates based on 100 MVMT on the three 

functional classifications of rural roads for the periods ending 2018 and 2020 increased 

from 2.110 to 2.113. Comparing the two 5-year average fatality rates, the difference is 

0.003. Rounded to the nearest hundredth, the difference would be 0.00. Therefore, the 

HRRR Special Rule would not apply to the State of Lincoln for the next fiscal year.

The State of Jefferson's 5-year average fatality rates in 100 MVMT on the three 

functional classifications of rural roads for the periods ending in 2018 and 2020 increased 

from 2.308 to 2.392. Comparing the two 5-year average fatality rates, the difference is 

0.084. Rounded to the nearest hundredth, the difference would be 0.08. Therefore, the 

HRRR Special Rule would apply to the State of Jefferson for the next fiscal year.

State Implementation of the HRRR Special Rule

If the HRRR Special Rule applies to a State, 23 U.S.C. 148(g)(1) requires that the State obligate 

in the next fiscal year for high-risk rural roads, as defined in accordance with their updated 

SHSP, an amount at least equal to 200 percent of its FY 2009 high-risk rural roads set-aside. The 

amount for each State if the HRRR Special Rule were to be triggered is provided as a Table in 

the Attachment. 

If the HRRR Special Rule applies to a State in a particular fiscal year, the FHWA will set aside 

the required amount from that year's HSIP apportionment with an associated obligation 

limitation of one year. This set-aside will have its own FMIS code. Please visit FHWA’s Notices 

website (https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/notices/) for more information on HRRR 

Special Rule set-aside funding amounts per fiscal year at the appropriate future time.

The FHWA will provide regular updates to the Division Offices to track the progress of 

obligating the required amount for States where the HRRR Special Rule applies. If the HRRR 

Special Rule applies to a State, the State should include information in its annual HSIP report 

required under 23 U.S.C. 148(h)(1)(A), verifying that it met the requirements of the HRRR 

Special Rule. 

Obligation limitation associated with HRRR Special Rule funds is only available for one fiscal 

year. If a State cannot obligate HRRR Special Rule funds in the first fiscal year, the State should 

explain why it is unable to obligate the HRRR Special Rule funds and must return any unused 

obligation limitation for August Redistribution. The State will be required to set aside formula 

obligation limitation in the second fiscal year for use only with the carried over HRRR Special 

Rule funds.
5 

If a State de-obligates HRRR Special Rule funds due to project underruns or project cancellation, 

the State must obligate the remaining HRRR Special Rule funds on another HRRR project by the 

end of the fiscal year. The following table outlines the HRRR Special Rule requirements, 

funding, and obligation limitation by year.

Table: HRRR Special Rule Requirements, Funding, and Obligation Limitation

 Year 1

FY in which HRRR Special Rule is

Triggered

Year 2

If Unobligated Balance Remains

Requirement States are required to obligate all 

HRRR Special Rule funds in the 

triggered FY (Year 1)

States required to obligate 

remaining HRRR Special Rule 

funds 

Funds 

(Contract 

Authority)

Set aside by HCF with designated 

program code

Funds will continue to be 

available for obligation

Obligation 

Limitation 

HCF will set aside HRRR Special 

Rule obligation limitation for Year 1 

funds in an amount equal to the 

contract authority

State required to set aside formula 

obligation limitation in an amount 

equal to the HRRR funds carried 

over from the prior year

August 

Redistribution

State must return unused set-aside 

HRRR Special Rule obligation 

limitation for August Redistribution. If 

not returned, the obligation limitation 

will expire and be removed from 

FMIS. Returned limitation will not be 

restored in the following year

State must return unused setaside formula obligation 

limitation for August 

Redistribution. If not returned, the 

obligation limitation will expire 

and be removed from FMIS. 

Returned limitation will not be 

restored in the following year

De-obligation If a State de-obligates previous years’ HRRR Special Rule funds for a 

legitimate reason, funds must be re-obligated that same FY on one or more 

HRRR projects.

Older Drivers and Pedestrians Special Rule Guidance

Statutory Reference

The Older Drivers and Pedestrians Special Rule at 23 U.S.C. 148(g)(2) provides: “If traffic 

fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and pedestrians over the age of 65 in a State 

increases during the most recent 2-year period for which data are available, that State shall be 

required to include, in the subsequent Strategic Highway Safety Plan of the State, strategies to 

address the increases in those rates, taking into account the recommendations included in the 

publication of the Federal Highway Administration entitled 'Highway Design Handbook for 
6 

Older Drivers and Pedestrians' (FHWA-RD-01-103), and dated May 2001, or as subsequently 

revised and updated.” 

In June 2014, FHWA revised and renamed its Handbook to incorporate new research findings 

and treatments to improve the safety of the transportation system for the aging population. 

Accordingly, for purposes of implementation of this Special Rule, States should refer to FHWA's 

“Handbook for Designing Roadways for the Aging Population” (FHWA-SA-14-103), available 

at: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/older_users/handbook/aging_driver_handbook_2014_final%20.pdf. 

Purpose

The purpose of this section of the guidance is to clarify: A) the definition of serious injury; B) 

how FHWA will determine if the Older Drivers and Pedestrians Special Rule applies to a State; 

and C) how States should implement this Special Rule.

Definitions

The FHWA has developed performance measures, as required in 23 U.S.C. 150(d), and provided 

the definition of "serious injury" as it relates to those measures. A serious injury is defined as any 

crash involving a motor vehicle traveling on a public roadway that is coded "Suspected Serious 

Injury (A)" as defined in the Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC).

1 (23 CFR 

490.205). 

FHWA Determination of Whether the Older Drivers and Pedestrians Special Rule Applies

To determine whether the Older Drivers and Pedestrians Special Rule applies in a State, the 

FHWA will consider older drivers and older pedestrians collectively. If the rate of traffic 

fatalities and serious injuries for drivers and pedestrians 65 years of age and older (referred to as 

"older drivers and pedestrians" in this document) in a State increases during the most recent 2-

year period, then the Older Drivers and Pedestrians Special Rule applies.

Specifically, the FHWA will– 

• Add together the number of fatalities for older drivers and pedestrians from the FARS 

Annual Report File and the number of serious injuries as reported in the State's annual 

Highway Safety Improvement Program report for drivers and pedestrians 65 years of age 

and older;

• Divide that combined amount by the population per 1,000 of State residents that are 65 

years of age or older from the U.S. Census Bureau; and

• Calculate the difference between the two 5-year average rates of fatalities and serious 

injuries. 

• Round the difference to the nearest hundredth. If the rounded difference results in an 

increase of 0.01 or greater, then the Older Drivers and Pedestrians Special Rule applies. 

1 Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (DOT HS 812 433, July 2017), or as subsequently revised and updated,

https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/Publication/812433.
7 

For example:

The State of Lincoln's 5-year average rate of fatalities and serious injuries per 1,000 

capita for older drivers and pedestrians was 202.120 for the period ending 2018 and 

202.123 for the period ending 2020. Comparing the two 5-year average fatality and 

serious injury rates, the difference is 0.003. Rounded to the nearest hundredth, the 

difference would be 0.0. Therefore, the Older Drivers and Pedestrians Special Rule would 

not apply to the State of Lincoln. 

The State of Jefferson's 5-year average rate of fatalities and serious injuries per 1,000 

capita for older drivers and pedestrians was 202.308 for the period ending 2018 and 

202.392 for the period ending 2020. Comparing the two 5-year average fatality and 

serious injury rates, the difference is 0.084. Rounded to the nearest hundredth, the 

difference would be 0.08. Therefore, the Older Drivers and Pedestrians Special Rule 

would apply to the State of Jefferson.

If the Older Drivers and Pedestrians Special Rule applies to a State in a particular fiscal year, the 

FHWA will notify the State by March of that fiscal year, after the data is available and the 

average rates of fatalities and serious injuries for older drivers and pedestrians are calculated.

State Implementation of the Older Drivers and Pedestrians Special Rule

If it is determined that the Older Drivers and Pedestrians Special Rule applies to a State, per 23 

U.S.C. 148(g)(2), that State shall include, in its subsequent SHSP update, strategies to address 

the increase in the older driver and older pedestrian fatal and serious injuries rate, taking into 

account the recommendations included in the 2014 FHWA publication, "Handbook for 

Designing Roadways for the Aging Population" and any subsequently revised and updated 

versions. The State also should conduct a secondary analysis to determine whether the increase is 

attributable to driver fatalities and injuries, pedestrian fatalities and injuries, or a combination of 

the two. This helps a State determine whether the emphasis on safety programs and 

countermeasures should be focused on drivers and/or pedestrians. 

Vulnerable Road User (VRU) Safety Special Rule

Statutory Reference

The new VRU Special Rule at 23 U.S.C. 148(g)(3) provides: “If the total annual fatalities of 

vulnerable road users in a State represents not less than 15 percent of the total annual crash 

fatalities in the State, that State shall be required to obligate not less than 15 percent of the 

amounts apportioned to the State under section 104(b)(3) for the following fiscal year for 

highway safety improvement projects to address the safety of vulnerable road users.’’

Purpose

The purpose of this section of the guidance is to clarify: A) the definition of “vulnerable road 

user”; B) how FHWA will determine if the VRU Special Rule applies to a State; and C) how a 

State should implement the VRU Special Rule.
8 

Definitions

The definition of “vulnerable road user” is provided in 23 U.S.C. 148(a)(15) as “a nonmotorist— 

‘‘(A) with a fatality analysis reporting system person attribute code that is included in the 

definition of the term ‘number of non-motorized fatalities’ in section 490.205 of title 23, 

Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations); or

‘‘(B) described in the term ‘number of non-motorized serious injuries’ in that section.”

While the statutory definition for “vulnerable road user” includes both “number of nonmotorized fatalities” and “number of serious injuries,” the VRU Special Rule only considers 

non-motorized fatalities, per 23 U.S.C. 148(g)(3).

2

 

 

FHWA Determination of Whether the VRU Safety Special Rule Applies

If the number of traffic fatalities for vulnerable road users (also referred to as "non-motorists") is 

equal to or greater than fifteen (15) percent of the total State fatalities in a single year period, 

then the VRU Special Rule applies. The FHWA will determine if the VRU Special Rule applies 

to each State and notify States of the determinations each year.

The FHWA will collect the annual number of fatalities for non-motorists and the total number of 

fatalities from the FARS. The number of non-motorist fatalities will then be divided by the total 

fatalities and multiplied by 100 to get a percentage. The VRU Special Rule applies if the 

calculated value is 15% or greater.

The VRU Special Rule requires the use of single year data. Since the number of fatalities for 

non-motorists and the total number of fatalities are whole integers, the percent will be rounded to 

the nearest whole integer. 

The table below shows the year of available fatality data that will be used in the determination 

and the fiscal year for which the VRU Special Rule would apply.

Table: Timeline of VRU Special Rule Determination

Annual 

data 

FHWA Notifies State DOT if

VRU Special Rule Applies

Fiscal Year that VRU Special

Rule would apply

2020 By March 2022 FY 2023

Oct. 1, 2022 to Sept. 30, 2023

2021 By March 2023 FY 2024

Oct. 1, 2023 to Sept. 30, 2024

2 The VRU Special Rule only considers non-motorized fatalities, which, by reference to 23 CFR 490.205, refers to 

fatalities with the FARS person attribute codes for Pedestrian, Bicyclist; Other Cyclist, and Person on Personal 

Conveyance. The FARS person attribute codes only describe the role of the person involved in the crash and may 

include other types of individuals that fall under the definition of these attribute codes. For example, a construction 

worker may be viewed as a Pedestrian (and therefore a vulnerable road user) if the construction worker is not in a 

vehicle.
9 

2022 By March 2024 FY 2025

Oct. 1, 2024 to Sept. 30, 2025

2023 March 2025 FY 2026 

Oct. 1, 2025 to Sept. 30, 2026 

State Implementation of the VRU Special Rule

If the VRU Special Rule applies to a State, that State shall be required to obligate in the next 

fiscal year not less than 15 percent of the amounts apportioned to the State under 23 U.S.C. 

104(b)(3) for the following fiscal year for highway safety improvement projects to address the 

safety of vulnerable road users. (23 U.S.C. 148(g)(3)). All highway safety improvement projects, 

including those implemented under the VRU Special Rule, must be on a public road consistent 

with the State’s SHSP and correct or improve a hazardous road location or feature, or address a 

highway safety problem (23 U.S.C. 148(a)(4)(A)). Therefore, States should ensure that the SHSP 

takes into consideration fatalities and serious injuries to pedestrians and bicyclists (See 23 U.S.C. 

148(d)(1)(B)(v)). States also should ensure the SHSP analyzes and makes effective use of safety 

data to address safety problems and opportunities on all public roads and for all road users (23 

CFR 924.9(a)(3)(vi)). 

If the VRU Special Rule applies to a State in a particular fiscal year, the FHWA will set aside the 

required amount of funds from that fiscal year’s HSIP apportionment along with associated 

obligation limitation of one year. This set-aside will have its own FMIS code. Please visit 

FHWA’s Notices website (https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/notices/) for more 

information on VRU Special Rule set-aside funding amounts per fiscal year at the appropriate 

future time.

The FHWA will provide regular updates to the Division Offices to track the progress of 

obligating the required amount for States where the VRU Special Rule applies. If the VRU 

Special Rule is applied to a State, the State should include information in its annual HSIP report 

required under 23 U.S.C. 148(h)(1)(A), verifying that it met the requirements of the VRU 

Special Rule.

Obligation limitation associated with VRU Special Rule funds is only available for one fiscal 

year. If a State does not obligate VRU Special Rule funds in the first fiscal year, the State should 

explain why it is unable to obligate the VRU Special Rule funds and must return any unused 

obligation limitation for August Redistribution. The State will be required to set aside formula 

obligation limitation in the second fiscal year for use only with the carried over VRU Special 

Rule funds.

If a State de-obligates VRU Special Rule funds due to project underruns or project cancellation, 

the State must obligate the remaining VRU Special Rule funds on another VRU project by the 

end of the fiscal year. The following table outlines the VRU Special Rule requirements, funding, 

and obligation limitation by year.
10 

Table: VRU Special Rule Requirements, Funding, and Obligation Limitation

 Year 1

FY in which VRU Special Rule is 

Triggered

Year 2

If Unobligated Balance Remains

Requirement States are required to obligate all 

VRU Special Rule funds in the 

triggered FY (Year 1)

States required to obligate 

remaining VRU Special Rule funds

Funds 

(Contract 

Authority)

Set aside by HCF with designated 

program code

Funds will continue to be available 

for obligation

Obligation 

Limitation 

HCF will set aside VRU Special 

Rule obligation limitation for Year 1 

funds in an amount equal to the 

contract authority

State required to set aside formula 

obligation limitation in an amount 

equal to the VRU funds carried over 

from the prior year

August 

Redistribution

State must return unused set-aside 

VRU Special Rule obligation 

limitation for August Redistribution. 

If not returned, the obligation 

limitation will expire and be 

removed from FMIS. Returned 

limitation will not be restored in the 

following year

State must return unused set-aside 

formula obligation limitation for 

August Redistribution. If not 

returned, the obligation limitation 

will expire and be removed from 

FMIS. Returned limitation will not 

be restored in the following year

De-obligation If a State de-obligates previous years’ VRU Special Rule funds for a 

legitimate reason, funds must be re-obligated that same FY on one or more 

VRU projects

Attachment

Table: 2009 Set-Aside Amounts and Obligation Requirements for HRRR Special Rule
11 

Attachment

Table: 2009 Set-Aside Amounts and Obligation Requirements for HRRR Special Rule

Source: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/notices/n4510742/n4510742t17.cfm 

State* 2009 HRRR 

set-aside funds

Funds required to be

obligated in a fiscal year for 

HRRR if the Special Rule 

applies

ALABAMA $2,062,489 $4,124,978

ALASKA $450,000 $900,000

ARIZONA $2,046,858 $4,093,716

ARKANSAS $1,374,327 $2,748,654

CALIFORNIA $8,781,564 $17,563,128

COLORADO $1,413,042 $2,826,084

CONNECTICUT $751,445 $1,502,890

DELAWARE $450,000 $900,000

DIST. OF COL. $450,000 $900,000

FLORIDA $4,722,502 $9,445,004

GEORGIA $3,149,726 $6,299,452

HAWAII $450,000 $900,000

IDAHO $647,399 $1,294,798

ILLINOIS $3,024,273 $6,048,546

INDIANA $1,756,64 5 $3,513,290

IOWA $1,335,895 $2,671,790

KANSAS $1,575,055 $3,150,110

KENTUCKY $1,439,993 $2,879,986

LOUISIANA $1,542,587 $3,085,174

MAINE $450,000 $900,000

MARYLAND $1,331,794 $2,663,588

MASSACHUSETTS $1,136,838 $2,273,676

MICHIGAN $2,926,006 $5,852,012

MINNESOTA $1,810,055 $3,620,110

MISSISSIPPI $1,639,574 $3,279,148

MISSOURI $2,328,568 $4,657,136

MONTANA $694,880 $1,389,760

NEBRASKA $938,461 $1,876,922

NEVADA $743,907 $1,487,814

NEW HAMPSHIRE $450,000 $900,000

NEW JERSEY $1,666,605 $3,333,210

NEW MEXICO $943,712 $1,887,424

NEW YORK $3,095,686 $6,191,372

NORTH CAROLINA $2,363,489 $4,726,978

NORTH DAKOTA $628,833 $1,257,666

OHIO $2,757,751 $5,515,502

OKLAHOMA $1,899,409 $3,798,818
12 

State* 2009 HRRR 

set-aside funds

Funds required to be

obligated in a fiscal year for 

HRRR if the Special Rule 

applies

OREGON $1,220,060 $2,440,120

PENNSYLVANIA $2,883,447 $5,766,894

RHODE ISLAND $450,000 $900,000

SOUTH CAROLINA $2,008,769 $4,017,538

SOUTH DAKOTA $758,550 $1,517,100

TENNESSEE $2,118,260 $4,236,520

TEXAS $7,286,076 $14,572,152

UTAH $665,659 $1,331,318

VERMONT $450,000 $900,000

VIRGINIA $2,229,887 $4,459,774

WASHINGTON $1,572,286 $3,144,572

WEST VIRGINIA $805,658 $1,611,316

WISCONSIN $1,868,071 $3,736,142

WYOMING $453,909 $907,818 

* The Puerto Rico Highway Program is an allocated program and not subject to the HRRR 

Special Rule (23 U.S.C. 165). 
13 

cc: 

Directors of Field Services

Safety Field

HCC

HCF

HPL

HSA