alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

v. 

JASON SCALISE, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Cr. No. 1:07-cr-00052 Erie 

(Civ. No. 12-61 Erie) 

ORDER ON JOINT REQUEST FOR AN AMENDED JUDGMENT 

On July 20, 2015, the Court granted Petitioner Jason Scalise's Motion to Vacate, Set 

Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, filed at Criminal No. 07-52 Erie, based 

on the parties joint request to resolve the motion to vacate and to proceed to a sentencing 

hearing. ECF No. 120. We granted the 2255 petition, vacated the August 6, 2009 Judgment and 

set a sentencing hearing. The parties have now filed a Joint Request for an Amended Judgment 

indicating that they have come to an agreement as to the appropriate sentence in this case. 

We originally sentenced Mr. Scalise to a total term of imprisonment of 168 months to be 

followed by 10 years of supervised release. The parties request that we impose a sentence of 100 

months' imprisonment at Count 1 and 100 months' imprisonment at Count 2, to be served 

concurrently. The parties further request that the term of imprisonment be followed by 5 years 

of supervised release, with the first 8 months to be served on home detention, with all other 

terms and conditions of supervision originally imposed to remain the same. We will grant this 

request, and enter an Amended Judgment. 

Case 1:07-cr-00052-MBC Document 128 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 2
fi, 

AND NOW, to-wit, this {, day of October, 2015, it is hereby ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Joint Request for an Amended Judgment is hereby 

GRANTED. 

The Court will enter an AMENDED JUDGMENT sentencing Defendant to 100 months 

of incarceration on Count One and 1 00 months of incarceration at Count Two, to be served 

concurrently for a total term of imprisonment of 100 months. The term of imprisonment shall be 

followed by a supervised release of 5 years, with the first 8 months to be served on home 

detention. All other terms and conditions of supervision originally imposed will remain in full 

force and effect. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the sentencing hearing set for November 4, 2015 is 

CANCELLED. 

1«~ /S_~UL, \_ 

Mffiirice B. Cohill, Jr. ... (". 

Senior United States District Judge 

2 

Case 1:07-cr-00052-MBC Document 128 Filed 10/06/15 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3131 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to expand and clarify the 

exclusion for orphan drugs under the Drug Price Negotiation Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Mr. BARRASSO (for himself and Mr. CARPER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to expand 

and clarify the exclusion for orphan drugs under the 

Drug Price Negotiation Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Optimizing Research 

5 Progress Hope And New Cures Act’’ or the ‘‘ORPHAN 

6 Cures Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3131 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXPANDING AND CLARIFYING THE EXCLUSION FOR 

2 ORPHAN DRUGS UNDER THE DRUG PRICE 

3 NEGOTIATION PROGRAM. 

4 Section 1192(e) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1320f–1(e)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1), by adding at the end the 

7 following new subparagraph: 

8 ‘‘(C) TREATMENT OF FORMER ORPHAN

9 DRUGS.—In calculating the amount of time that 

10 has elapsed with respect to the approval of a 

11 drug or licensure of a biological product under 

12 subparagraph (A)(ii) and subparagraph (B)(ii), 

13 respectively, the Secretary shall not taken into 

14 account any period during which such drug or 

15 product was a drug described in paragraph 

16 (3)(A).’’; and 

17 (2) in paragraph (3)(A)— 

18 (A) by striking ‘‘only one rare disease or 

19 condition’’ and inserting ‘‘one or more rare dis20 eases or conditions’’; and 

21 (B) by striking ‘‘such disease or condition’’ 

22 and inserting ‘‘one or more rare diseases or 

23 conditions (as such term is defined in section 

24 526(a)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos25 metic Act)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
*	CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY 
WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A 
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST.


January 8, 1997
Our Ref: B96-7701-RJTL-RJ0350-003


Atlantic Coast Airlines
1 Export Drive, 
Sterling, Virginia,
U.S.A. 20164


Gentlemen,

Letter Agreement No. 003 to Purchase Agreement No. RJ-0350 dated January 8, 
1997 (the "Agreement") between Bombardier Inc. ("BRAD") and Atlantic Coast 
Airlines ("Buyer") relating to the purchase of twelve (12) Canadair Regional 
Jet Aircraft (the "Aircraft")


Subject:		Option Aircraft

1.0	This letter constitutes an integral part of the Agreement and evidences 
our further agreement with the matters set forth below.  All terms used 
herein and in the Agreement and not defined herein, shall have the same 
meaning as in the Agreement.

2.0	




*
[3 PAGES OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS OMITTED]


6.0	*






7.0	*





Should there be any inconsistency between this Letter Agreement and the 
Agreement with respect to the subject matter covered by the terms hereof, then 
this Letter Agreement shall prevail.


Yours truly,
BOMBARDIER INC.



________________________				Date:_____________
Michel Bourgeois
Vice President, Contracts 





Acknowledged and Accepted


Atlantic Coast Airlines



________________________				Date:_____________
James B. Glennon
Sr. Vice President and C.F.O.

 

 
[Footnote continued from previous page]

[Footnote continued on next page]

3
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                     -----------



      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  James  K.  McHugh,  as  the  Chief Financial Officer of N-Viro International
Corporation,  certify  that,  to the best of my knowledge, (i) the Form 10-KSB/A
(Amendment No. 1) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
Form  10-KSB/A  (Amendment No. 1) fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  N-Viro  International
Corporation.


/s/  James  K.  McHugh
----------------------
James  K.  McHugh,  Chief  Financial  Officer
April  29,  2008
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

____________ No. 22

- 40785

____________ Kevin Rashaan Golden, Plaintiff

— Appellant ,

versus City of Longview, Public Works Division ; Rolin McPhee, Director, City of Longview Public Works ; Chi Ping Stephen Ha, Supervisor, Traffic Engineering Department ; Keith Covington, Assistant Supervisor, Traffic Engineering Depart ment ; Mary Ann Miller, Human Resources Director ; Unknown Parties, Interested parties within Gregg County, Texas , Defendants

— Appellees

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC N o. 6:20

- CV

- 620

______________________________ Before Richman , Chief Judge , and Haynes and Duncan , Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : * Pro se plaintiff Kevin Rashaan Golden appeals the dismissal of his

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir

. R

. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 9, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-40785 Document: 00516962517 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/09/2023No. 22

- 40785

2 claims alleging that he was illegally fired on account of his disability

. See Golden v. City of Longview , No. 6:20

- CV

- 00620

- JDK, 2021 WL 3829126 , at *1 0 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 4, 2021) (recommendation to dismiss claims against City

e mployees under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) ); Golden v. City of Longview , No. 6:20

- CV

- 620

- JDK

- JDL, 2021 WL 3809265 , at *1 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2021) (adopting recommendation); Golden v. City of Longview , No. 6:2 0

- CV

- 00620

- JDL, 2022 WL 2704533 , at *1 1 (E.D. Tex. July 11, 2022) (summary judgment dismissing remaining ADA claims); Golden v. City of Longview , 2022 WL 16625713 , at *9 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2022) (same)

. Finding no reversible error, we AFFIRM

. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6. Case: 22-40785 Document: 00516962517 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/09/2023
Exhibit 10.8
 AMENDMENT NUMBER 4
AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY NON-QUALIFIED
RETIREMENT PLAN
 st
 W I T N E S S E T H:
      1.
    
    Article 4.1 of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following revised
Article 4.1:
 Normal Retirement Benefit
  less




---



##### 



(i)
    
    income resulting from grants of Restricted Stocks, Restricted Stock Units, or
Stock Appreciation Rights on or after July 25, 2002 pursuant to the American National
Insurance Company 1999 Stock and Incentive Plan, other than dividends paid on
Restricted Stock prior to the vesting thereof; and
 (ii)
    
    in-service payments under this Plan or any other tax-qualified or
non-qualified employee benefit plan
    AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANYG.  Richard FerdinandtsenPresident, Chief Operating Officer
**Exhibit 10.38.1**

OMNIBUS AMENDMENT REGARDING 

LOAN AGREEMENT 

This OMNIBUS AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) dated December 21, 2009 is entered into by and between LFB Biotechnologies S.A.S. (the“Purchaser”) and GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”). 

WHEREAS, in connection with the execution anddelivery of that certain Loan Agreement dated June 18, 2009 by and between the Purchaser and the Company (the “Loan Agreement”), the Company issued to the Purchaser a Promissory Note dated June 18, 2009 in the original principalamount of Three Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($3,500,000) (the “Note”); 

WHEREAS, on the date hereof, theCompany has issued an Amended and Restated Promissory Note, (as further amended or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Amended Note”) that amends, restates, replaces and supersedes the Note in its entirety; and 

WHEREAS, for the avoidance of doubt, the Company and the Purchaser desire to amend (i) the Loan Agreement, (ii) that certainAmended and Restated Security Agreement by and between the Purchaser and the Company dated as of June 18, 2009 and effective as of December 22, 2008 with respect to certain matters, (iii) that certain Securities Purchase Agreement byand between the Purchaser and the Company dated June 18, 2009, (iv) that certain Second Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing executed by the Company dated December 22, 2008, as amended by Amendment to Mortgage, SecurityAgreement and Fixture Filing dated June 18, 2009, and (v) any other documents and agreements related to the Loan Agreement, each as amended or otherwise modified from time to time (collectively the “Transaction Documents”) suchthat each reference to the Note contained in each of the Transaction Documents is deemed to refer to the Amended Note; and 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration for the mutual covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

**1. Amendment****.** Every reference contained in each of the Transaction Documents to the “Secured Note” shall be deemedto be a reference to the Amended Note. 

**2. Counterparts.**This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterpartsby original or facsimile signature, each such counterpart shall be an original instrument, and all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 

*[remainder left intentionally blank]*

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned hereby executes this Omnibus Amendment as of thedate first set forth above. 

 
**COMPANY:**GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.By: /s/ John B. GreenTitle: John B. Green, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
 
**PURCHASER:**LFB BIOTECHNOLOGIES S.A.S.By: /s/ Christian Béchon
Christian Béchon

President

*Signature Page to Omnibus Amendment*

*(Loan Agreement)*
#### Amos WEAVER, Petitioner, v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE, Respondent.

No. L-421.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

July 31, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark Scott, Chief Operating and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with
the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law.

                                        /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        Chief Operating and Financial Officer
                                        May 15, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BENJAMIN J. WHERRY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 06-100 Erie

v. )

)

WARDEN SHERMAN, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was received by the Clerk of

Court on June 21, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan

Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act,

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 15], filed on

June 23, 2006, recommended that Plaintiff’s motion be denied. The parties were

allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on

Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo

review of the motion and documents in the case, together with the Report and

Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis [Doc. No. 14] is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 15] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on June 23, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:06-cv-00100-SJM-SPB Document 17 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
TransTexas Gas Corporation (the "Company") on Form S-3 (33-91494) of, and the
references to, our reserve report dated February 1, 1999 ("Reserve Report"), and
to the use of our name under the caption "Experts" and elsewhere therein in the
form and context in which they appear. We also consent to the references to our
Reserve Report and to the use of our name in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended January 31, 1999 in the form and context in which they
appear.

                                   NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                   By:  /s/ Danny D. Simmons              
                                      ------------------------------------
                                        Danny D. Simmons
                                        Senior Vice President

Houston, Texas
May 17, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2704 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2704

  To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to establish an exception to 
certain payment limitations in the case of person or legal entity that 
        derives income from agriculture, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2023

Mr. Padilla (for himself and Mr. Tillis) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to establish an exception to 
certain payment limitations in the case of person or legal entity that 
        derives income from agriculture, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Access to Agriculture Disaster 
Programs Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTION FOR INCOME DERIVED FROM AGRICULTURE.

    Section 1001D(b) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (7 U.S.C. 1308-
3a(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``paragraph (3)'' and 
        inserting ``paragraphs (3) and (4)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Exception.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In the case of a payment or 
                benefit described in subparagraph (B), the limitation 
                established by paragraph (1) shall not apply to a 
                person or legal entity during a crop, fiscal, or 
                program year, as appropriate, if not less than 75 
                percent of the average adjusted gross income of the 
                person or legal entity derives from farming, ranching, 
                or silviculture activities, including agritourism, 
                direct-to-consumer marketing of agricultural products, 
                the sale of agricultural equipment owned by such person 
                or entity, and other agriculture-related activities, as 
                determined by the Secretary.
                    ``(B) Payment or benefit described.--A payment or 
                benefit referred to in subparagraph (A) is--
                            ``(i) a payment or benefit under subtitle E 
                        of title I of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 
                        U.S.C. 9081); or
                            ``(ii) a payment or benefit under section 
                        196 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and 
                        Reform Act of 1996 (7 U.S.C. 7333).''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26086]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No RP97-533-000]


Pacific Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Change FERC 
Gas Tariff

September 26, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 22, 1997, Pacific Gas Transmission 
Company (PGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1-A: Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 4. PGT requested 
the above-referenced tariff sheet become effective November 1, 1997.
    PGT asserts that the purpose of this filing is to modify the rate 
for service on PGT's Medford, Oregon Extension under Rate Schedule FTS-
1 (E-2) (WWP) in accordance with the negotiated rate formula for that 
service as specified in PGT's FERC Gas Tariff.
    PGT further states that a copy of this filing has been served on 
PGT's jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest said filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance 
with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26086 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.4


                           Wire One Technologies, Inc.
                                 225 Long Avenue
                           Hillside, New Jersey 07205

                                                          As of January 1, 2003
Mr. Leo Flotron
c/o Wire One Technologies, Inc.
4600 Lyons Road
Miamisburg, OH  45342

Dear Leo:

         This letter, when accepted by you, shall constitute an amendment to the
employment agreement (the "Agreement"), dated January 2, 2001, as amended to
date, between Wire One Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") and you. The Company
and you hereby agree as follows:

         1. The Company has requested that, to contribute to an improvement in
the Company's financial condition and for no other reason, you agree, as an
amendment to paragraph 2(a) of the Agreement, to reduce your base salary
compensation thereunder so as to be payable at the rate of $300,000 per annum
during the period commencing as of the date hereof through December 31, 2003. In
consideration of the agreement by several other of the Company's executives to
salary reductions similar in nature, you hereby agree to the salary reduction
set forth in the preceding sentence.

         2. Except as modified hereby, the Agreement remains in full force and
effect.


                                       Yours very truly,

                                       WIRE ONE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                       By: /s/
                                           -----------------------------------

ACCEPTED:

/s/
-------------------------------
Leo Flotron
### -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74 -73 38 39 40 41 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/06 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 06 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■


## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ● ● ● ●


## ★ ● ● ● ●