alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32


            CERTIFICATION OF BLAIR R. COUEY, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
             AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
               TO 18 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In Connection with the Annual Report of Evans Systems, Inc. ("ESI") on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Blair R. Couey, Chief
Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


/s/ Blair R. Couey
------------------
Blair R. Couey
President and Chief Executive Officer
January 12, 2006



/s/ Blair R. Couey
------------------
Blair R. Couey
As Acting Chief Financial Officer
January 12, 2006







A signed original of this written statement has been provided to ESI and will be
retained by ESI and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00056

- CV

ORCA ASSETS, G.P., L .L.C.,
ORCA/ICI DEVELOPMENT , ORCA PETROLEUM, LTD., AND ALLEN
BERRY APPELLANTS

V.

LOUIS DORFMAN; K.I. HOLDINGS, LTD.; SAM MYERS, J.M .D. RESOURCES, INC.; B ILLY COGDELL BOWDEN; BARB ARA STANDFIELD; STACEY D ORFMAN

KIVOWITZ; JULIA DORF MAN; MARK DORFMAN; DAVID PHILLIP COOK; CHERYL KING CO OK; SAM Y. DORFMAN, JR.; PET ROHAWK PROPERTIES, L.P.; FR ANK MORAVITS, INDIVIDUAL LY AND
AS TRUSTEE OF THE MO RAVITS
CHILDREN TRUST NO. 1 AND
MORAVITS CHILDREN TR UST NO. 2, SHELBY MORAVITS, AND
JERRY KORTZ APPELLEES

NO. 02

- 14

- 00057

- CV

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
AS TRUSTEE OF THE RE D CREST
TRUST APPELLANT2 V.

LOUIS DORFMAN; K.I. HOLDINGS, LTD.; SAM MYERS, J.M .D. RESOURCES, I NC.; BILLY COGDELL BOWDEN; BARB ARA STANDFIELD; STACEY D ORFMAN

KIVOWITZ; JULIA DORF MAN; MARK DORFMAN; DAVID PHILLIP COOK; CHERYL KING CO OK; SAM Y. DORFMAN, JR.; PET ROHAWK PROPERTIES, L.P.; FR ANK MORAVITS, INDIVIDUAL LY AND
AS TRUSTEE OF THE MO RAVITS
CHILDREN TRUST NO. 1 AND
MORAVITS CHILDREN TR UST NO. 2, SHELBY MORAVITS, AND
JERRY KORTZ APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 342ND DISTR ICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 342

- 259139

- 12

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered appellant s ’ joint motions to dismiss their appeal s of

the trial court’s order with respect to appellee Petrohawk Properties, L.P. only.

We grant both motions and dismiss appellants’ appeals with respect to appellee

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.3 Petrohawk Properties, L.P. on ly , with prejudice

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1),

43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal s shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for

which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d)

.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; MCCOY and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 7 , 2014
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KENTLIN HOPKINS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 09-200 Erie

v. )

)

CORRECTIONS OFFICER )

KENDILE, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [1] and civil rights

complaint were received by the Clerk of Court on August 7, 2009 and were referred to

United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation

in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and

72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. However, Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis motion

was unaccompanied by a certified copy of his institutional account statement(s) as

required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). As a result, Magistrate Judge Baxter entered an

order on August 12, 2009 [2] directing the Plaintiff to submit a certified copy of the

required institutional account statement(s) on or before September 1, 2009 or suffer

dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff appealed that order to this

Court [4] and, on August 31, 2009, I entered a text order directing that Plaintiff be

granted an extension of time until October 1, 2009 in which to file the required

institutional account statement(s) or suffer dismissal of this case for failure to prosecute. 

On September 14, 2009, Plaintiff filed an “In Forma Pauperis Verified Statement” [7];

however, no account statement was attached to this document. Accordingly, on

October 21, 2009, Magistrate Judge Baxter issued an order [8] directing the Plaintiff to

submit the required statement(s) on or before November 2, 2009 or suffer dismissal of

this action for failure to prosecute. To date, Petitioner has failed to submit any

institutional account statement(s).

Case 1:09-cv-00200-SJM-SPB Document 10 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Judge Baxter's Report and Recommendation, filed on December 8, 2009 [9],

recommends that the instant civil action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, inasmuch

as Plaintiff has failed to comply with the terms of the courts’ orders by submitting the

required financial documentation. Plaintiff was allowed ten (10) days from the date of

service in which to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail at SCI

Forest, where he is incarcerated. To date, he has filed no objections to the Report and

Recommendation. 

After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the

Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 6 day of April, 2010; th

IT IS ORDERED that the instant civil action be, and hereby is,

DISMISSED for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on

December 8, 2009 [9], is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin 

SEAN J. McLAUGHLIN

United States District Judge

cm: Kentlin Hopkins 

GV-6300 

SCI Forest

PO BOX 945 

Marienville, PA 16239 

U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter

Case 1:09-cv-00200-SJM-SPB Document 10 Filed 04/06/10 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51094-51095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25814]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-161-009]


Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

September 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 17, 1997, Iroquois Gas Transmission 
System, L.P. (Iroquois) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to 
become effective November 1, 1997:

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 47
Original Sheet No. 47A
First Revised Sheet No. 50A
Second Revised Sheet No. 57A
Second Revised Sheet No. 57B
Original Sheet No. 57C

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 59
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 60
First Revised Sheet No. 64A
First Revised Sheet No. 64B
Second Revised Sheet No. 106
Third Revised Sheet No. 120
    In addition, Iroquois also tendered the following sheet to become 
effective June 1, 1997:

Substitute Original Revised Sheet No. 64B

    Iroquois states that the primary purpose of filing all these 
sheets, except Substitute Original Sheet No. 64B, is to comply with the 
Commission's June 27, 1997 Order in this docket accepting Iroquois' pro 
forma tariff sheets. Substitute Original Sheet No. 64B is

[[Page 51095]]

being filed because Iroquois discovered that, in making tariff filings 
in compliance with previous Commission orders in this docket, it had 
inadvertently filed two Original Sheets No. 64B, each with only part of 
the text that should have been included on that sheet. Substitute 
Original Sheet No. 64B includes all of the text from those two sheets 
on one substitute original sheet. No other changes were made on this 
sheet.
    Iroquois also states that copies of this filing were served upon 
all customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25814 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3121 

To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to improve 

provisions relating to dyslexia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 25, 2023 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself and Mr. HICKENLOOPER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 

to improve provisions relating to dyslexia, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘21st Century Dyslexia 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DYSLEXIA. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 602 of the Individuals 

8 with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1401) is 

9 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3121 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (3)(A), by striking ‘‘or specific 

2 learning disabilities’’ and inserting ‘‘specific learning 

3 disabilities, or dyslexia’’; 

4 (2) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(4) DYSLEXIA.—The term ‘dyslexia’ means an 

7 unexpected difficulty in reading for an individual 

8 who has the intelligence to be a much better reader, 

9 most commonly caused by a difficulty in the phono10 logical processing (the appreciation of the individual 

11 sounds of spoken language), which affects the ability 

12 of an individual to speak, read, and spell.’’; and 

13 (3) in paragraph (30)— 

14 (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘dys15 lexia,’’; and 

16 (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘or 

17 of environmental’’ and all that follows and in18 serting ‘‘or dyslexia’’. 

19 (b) PROVISION OF ACCOMMODATIONS AND SERV20 ICES.—The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act is 

21 amended by inserting after section 608 (20 U.S.C. 1407) 

22 the following: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3121 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 608A. PROVISION OF ACCOMMODATIONS AND SERV2 ICES. 

3 ‘‘In determining eligibility for, or providing, an ac4 commodation or service under this title, a local educational 

5 agency or other agency shall provide equal access, to the 

6 accommodation or service, to all eligible children, includ7 ing eligible children who are— 

8 ‘‘(1) children from low-income families; 

9 ‘‘(2) children from families with low socio10 economic status; and 

11 ‘‘(3) children who are limited English pro12 ficient.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 31.2

                           Section 302 Certifications

         I, Satoru Hirai, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

     b)  [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5,
         2003)]; and

     c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
         operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 3, 2004                 /s/ Satoru Hirai
                                        -------------------
                                        Satoru Hirai
                                        Chief Operating Officer and
                                        Former Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report datedDecember 17, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule (which report included an unqualified opinion) included in the Annual Report of Shiloh Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the years endedOctober 31, 2008 and 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Shiloh Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-103152, effective February 12,2003 and File No. 333-21161, effective February 5, 2007). 

/s/    Grant Thornton LLP 

Cleveland, Ohio 

December 17, 2008
PUBLIC LAW 104–2—FEB. 9, 1995 109 STAT. 45

Public Law 104–2

104th Congress

An Act

To amend section 61h–6 of title 2, United States Code.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section

61h–6 of title 2; The Congress, Chapter 4—Officers and Employees

of Senate and House of Representatives; United States Code, is

amended to read as follows:

‘‘§ 61h–6. Appointment of consultants by Majority Leader,

Minority Leader, Secretary of the Senate, and

Legislative Counsel of the Senate; compensation

‘‘(a) The Majority Leader and the Minority Leader, are each

authorized to appoint and fix the compensation of not more than

four individual consultants, on a temporary or intermittent basis,

at a daily rate of compensation not in excess of the per diem

equivalent of the highest gross rate of annual compensation which

may be paid to employees of a standing committee of the Senate.

The Secretary of the Senate is authorized to appoint and fix the

compensation of not more than two individual consultants, on a

temporary or intermittent basis, at a daily rate of compensation

not in excess of the per diem equivalent of the highest gross rate

of annual compensation which may be paid to employees of a

standing committee of the Senate. The Legislative Counsel of the

Senate (subject to the approval of the President pro tempore) is

authorized to appoint and fix the compensation of not more than

two consultants, on a temporary or intermittent basis, at a daily

rate of compensation not in excess of that specified in the first

sentence of this section. The provisions of section 8344 of title

5 shall not apply to any individual serving in a position under

this authority. Expenditures under this authority shall be paid

from the contingent fund of the Senate upon vouchers approved

by the President pro tempore, Majority Leader, Minority Leader,

Secretary of the Senate, or Legislative Counsel of the Senate, as

the case may be.

Feb. 9, 1995

[S. 273]
109 STAT. 46 PUBLIC LAW 104–2—FEB. 9, 1995

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 273:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):

Jan. 24, considered and passed Senate.

Jan. 27, considered and passed House.

Æ

‘‘(b) The Majority Leader, and the Minority Leader, in appointing individuals to consultant positions under authority of this section, may appoint one such individual to such position at an annual

rate of compensation rather than at a daily rate of compensation,

but such annual rate shall not be in excess of the highest gross

rate of annual compensation which may be paid to employees of

a standing committee of the Senate.’’.

Approved February 9, 1995.
THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20590 

O’ 

January 22, 2020 

Policy Statement on the Implementation of the 

Notification and Federal Employee 

Antidiscrimination and Retaliation 

Act of 2002 (No FEAR Act), Pub. L. No. 107-174 

The Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act of 2002 

(No FEAR Act) requires Federal agencies to keep their employees, former employees, and 

applicants for employment informed of their antidiscrimination and whistleblower protections; 

post quarterly statistics on their Web sites; and train all employees regarding the rights and 

remedies to which they are entitled under the law. Federal agencies are required to submit 

annual reports to Congress demonstrating their compliance with the law, as measured by a 

number of specific criteria, not later than 180 days after the end of each fiscal year. 

I fully support the principles of the No FEAR Act, and I am committed to providing a workplace 

environment that is free from discrimination as one of my major equal opportunity goals. It is 

the U.S. Department of Transportation’s policy to prohibit employment discrimination and 

interference or retaliation when protected disclosures are made, as stated in the whistleblower 

protection laws. 

I have assigned the Departmental Office of Civil Rights and the Office of the Assistant Secretary 

for Administration joint responsibility for ensuring the proper implementation of the No FEAR 

Act’s mandatory requirements. I expect all departmental organizations to offer their full support 

to ensure compliance with the requirements of the No FEAR Act. You may obtain further 

information regarding the No FEAR Act by contacting the Departmental Office of Civil Rights 

for assistance or visiting the Office’s Web site at https://www.transportation.gov/civil-rights. 

Elaine L. Chao
#### Miriam COWART, Appellant, v. M. C. LEWIS, Appellee.

No. 69-392.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 20, 1970.

Howard Anderson and J. Russell Horns-by of the Law Offices of J. Russell Horns-by, Orlando, for appellant.

Norma Jean Wagner, of Sam E. Murrell & Sons, Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669.

WALDEN, McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26112]



[[Page 51647]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS), has 
submitted the following public information collection requests (ICRs) 
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in 
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Copies of these individual ICRs, with 
applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by calling the 
Corporation for National and Community Service, Roger L. Hurley, (202) 
606-5000, Extension 144.
    Comments should be sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the Corporation for National and 
Community Service, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, 
Washington, D.C., 20503. (202) 395-7316, within 30 days from the date 
of this publication in the Federal Register.
    The OMB is particularly interested in comments which:
    Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the 
Corporation, including whether the information will have practical 
utility;
    Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
    Enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and
    Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who 
are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
submissions of responses.
    Type of Review: Renewal.
    Agency: Corporation for National and Community Service.
    Title: Americorps NCCC Service Project Application.
    OMB Number: 3045-0010.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Affected Public: Various non-profit organizations/project sponsors.
    Number of Respondents: 800.
    Estimated Time Per Respondent: 3 hrs.
    Total Burden Hours: 2400 hrs.
    Total Annualized capital/startup costs: N/A.
    Total Annual Cost (operating/maintaining systems or purchasing 
services): $33,600.
    Description: The Corporation for National and Community Service 
proposes to renew the AmeriCorps NCCC Service Project Application in a 
revised form, which incorporate lessons learned since the program 
inception. The Form is the means by which various organizations can 
request NCCC Members to assist in community service projects, and by 
which the NCCC evaluates such proposals for approval and selection.

    Dated: September 29, 1997.
Andrew P. Chambers,
AmeriCorps NCCC National Director.
[FR Doc. 97-26112 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-P