alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Regal Cinemas, Inc. on  Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-52943, 33-74634, 333-13291, and
333-13295) of our report dated February 6, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Regal Cinemas, Inc. as of January 2, 1997
and January 1, 1998, and for each of the three years in the period ended January
1, 1998, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Knoxville, Tennessee
March 29, 1999
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003)
 
 I, Donald R. Katz, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of Audible, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"):
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) [15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 /s/ Donald R. KatzName: Donald R. KatzDate: August ___, 2003
#### C. I. INC., a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. TRAVEL INTERNATIONALE, LTD., a foreign corporation, George E. Batchelor and International Aerodyne, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Appellees.

No. 69-463.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 28, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 21, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### ASHLAND EXPLORATION, INC. v. LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION et al.

No. 62118.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1978.

Liskow & Lewis, John M. Wilson, New Orleans, Snellings, Breard, Sartor, Shafto & Inabnett, D. R. Sartor, Jr., Monroe, for plaintiff-appellee.

Marshal] B. Brinkley, Gen. Counsel, Baton Rouge, for defendants-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.
0601061 CHICKEN_BRO 1/18/06 4:18 PM Page 1

DICCIONARIO
DICTIONARY

CAMINAR WALK

La sefial que indica caminar no significa que es
seguro cruzar la calle. Sdlo indica que es su
turno para cruzar.

ih ia The walk signal does not mean it is safe to step into
the street. It only means that it is your turn to cross.

ESPERAR WAIT

Cuando la mano esté iluminada
con la luz roja constante, no cruce.
When the illuminated hand is a steady red.

do not cross.
"a

ACERA SIDEWALK

Use las aceras cuando las haya. Si no hay aceras,
camine de frente al trafico para que pueda salir a
tiempo de la carretera si un coche se desvia.

Use sidewalks where provided. If there are no
sidewalks, walk facing the traffic so you can get
out of the way if a car leaves the road

For information about this material go to hitp:/safely hwa.dot gov/ped_bike/ped_bike_hsp.htm FHWA-SA-05-014

Aunque se sienta
seguro al cruzar las
calles de alrededor
de su casa, no asuma
que los coches
pararan cuando cruce.

Highway Administration

National Highway Traffi Admi



0601061 CHICKEN_BRO 1/18/06 4:18 PM Page 2 ©

CROSS WITH CARE OBEY TRAFFIC SIGNALS

Make sure traffic has stopped Stop at the steady red hand.
before crossing when Do not cross.
the walk signal is lit.

CRUCE CON CUIDADO ~

Asegurese de que el trafico
ha parado antes de cruzar
cuando la sefal que indica

caminar esta encendida.

RESPETE LAS SENALES
DE TRAFICO

Pare cuando la mano esté
en luz roja constante. No cruce.

BE ALERT

Look both ways before you
cross. Watch for turning

BE CAUTIOUS

Don’t start to cross if the
red hand is flashing.
Finish crossing quickly if
you have started.

vehicles. Use crosswalks.

ESTE ALERTA

Mire a ambos lados antes de cruzar.

TENGA CUIDADO Cuidado con los vehiculos que giran en la

esquina. Utilice los pasos de peatones.
No empiece a cruzar si la luz esta intermitente.
Termine de cruzar si ya ha empezado.

—p—
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r 

### 136872 Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136872 COA: 284490 Muskegon CC: 06-054145-FH LONDORA LATASHA KITCHENS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 27, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0915 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 22, 2008

Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

JOHN DARE, 

Petitioner, 

UNITED STATES PAROLE 

COMMISSION, et al., 

Respondents. 

Civil Action No. 05-257 Erie 

MEMORANDUMORDER 

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on September 9, 

2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for 

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(I), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 231, filed on 11 April 12, 2006, recommended that Petitioner's Petition be denied. The parties were 

allowed ten (1 0) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on 

Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondents. Petitioner filed objections [Doc. No. 

11 261 on April 24, 2006. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, 

11 together with the Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following 11 order is entered: 

11 AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus [Doc. No. I] is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 231 of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed 

I1 on April 12, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. 

S/ Sean J. McLaughlin United States District Judge 

cm: All parties of record 

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:05-cv-00257-SJM-SPB Document 29 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 21.1

                                                     Subsidiaries

Truck Components Inc.
         Gunite Corporation
                  Gunite EMI Corporation
         Brillion Iron Works, Inc.
         Fabco Automotive Corporation

Bostrom Holdings, Inc.
         Bostrom Seating, Inc.
                  Bostrom Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Mexican company)
         Bostrom Specialty Seating, Inc.
Imperial Holdings Corp. - 1 (General Partner - 1% in Imperial Group, LP)
Imperial Holdings Corp. - 2 (Limited Partner - 99% in Imperial Group LP)
         Imperial Group, LP
TTII Sales Corporation
JAII Management Company

All subsidiaries  are Delaware  corporations and are 100% directly or indirectly
owned,  except (1) Imperial Group, LP which is a Delaware  limited  partnership,
(2)  Bostrom  Mexico S.A. de C.V.  which is a Mexican  corporation  and (3) TTII
Sales Corporation which is a Barbados corporation.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3220 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3220

To expand the tropical disease product priority review voucher program 
      to encourage prevention and treatment of coccidioidomycosis.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2023

 Mr. Kelly (for himself and Ms. Sinema) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To expand the tropical disease product priority review voucher program 
      to encourage prevention and treatment of coccidioidomycosis.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANDING THE TROPICAL DISEASE PRODUCT PRIORITY REVIEW 
              VOUCHER PROGRAM TO ENCOURAGE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF 
              COCCIDIOIDOMYCOSIS.

    Section 524(a)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 360n(a)(3)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraph (S) as subparagraph (T); 
        and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (R) the following:
                    ``(S) Coccidioidomycosis.''.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-15-00403-CV

David Musick & Kayla Musick 

v.

Federal National Mortgage Association

NO. 1048329 IN THE CO CIVIL CT AT LAW NO 2 OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING

CLK RECORD

$10.00

$175.00

$20.00

$89.00

07/17/2015

05/29/2015

05/29/2015

05/21/2015

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$294.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this October 23, 2015.
(A)

US Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration

:24 PM Page 9

Alcohol and drugs impair your ability
to walk or ride a bicycle.

y Traffic Safety Administration

FHWA-SA-05-023

For information about this material go to htip //safely fhwa dot gov/ped_bike/ped_bike_ hsp. hi



0601061 CHICKEN FLY 1/ 4:24 PM Page 10

i Sabia Usted?

El alcohol y las drogas disminuyen
su: capacidad para caminar y

= montar en bicicleta.
(2)
jesaeiiteeecy Nesneaes

Para informacion sobre este material visite la pagina web
FHWA-SA-05-023 http/safetyfnwa det gov/ped_bike/ped bike hsp.htm
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROBERTO PEREZ-GARCIA, JR.

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-24-00215-CR

Appeal from the

409th District Court 

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#20230D03331)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on Appellant’s voluntary motion to dismiss the appeal 

and concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. We further order this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**CLARENCE COLEMAN,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 72 WM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 27th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File a Petition for** 

**Allowance of Appeal** Nunc Pro Tunc **is** DENIED

**.**

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27076]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR


Employment and Training Administration

The Lovable Company

TA-W-33,5845 Buford, Georgia
TA-W-33,584C, St. Augustine, Florida
TA-W-33,584D, Orlando, Florida
TA-W-33,584E, Branson, Missouri
TA-W-33,584F, Osage Beach, Missouri
TA-W-33,584G, Sikeston, Missouri
TA-W-33,584H, Commerce, Georgia
TA-W-33,584I, Locust Grove, Georgia
TA-W-33,584J, Eddyville, Kentucky
TA-W-33,584K, Horse Cave, Kentucky
TA-W-33,584L, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
TA-W-33,584M, Normal, Illinois
TA-W-33,584N, Nashville, Tennessee
TA-W-33,584O, Woodbridge, Virginia

Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on July 29, 1997, applicable to 
all workers of The Lovable Company, Buford, Georgia. The notice was 
published in the Federal Register on September 4, 1997 (62 46775).
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
all workers will be separated at The Lovable Company's various outlet 
stores when they close in September, 1997. The workers provide retail 
selling of ladies' undergarments that are manufactured by The Lovable's 
production facilities.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of The Lovable Company adversely affected by increased imports 
of ladies' undergarments.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-33,584 is hereby issued as 
follows:
    ``All workers of The Lovable Company, Buford, Georgia (TA-W-
33,584); and at the various locations cited below, who became totally 
or partially separated from employment on or after June 9, 1996 are 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the 
Trade Act of 1974:

TA-W-33,584C  St. Augustine, Florida
TA-W-33,584D  Orlando, Florida
TA-W-33,584E  Branson, Missouri
TA-W-33,584F  Osage Beach, Missouri
TA-W-33,584G  Sikeston, Missouri
TA-W-33,584H  Commerce, Georgia
TA-W-33,584I  Locust Grove, Georgia
TA-W-33,584J  Eddyville, Kentucky
TA-W-33,584K  Horse Cave, Kentucky
TA-W-33,584L  Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
TA-W-33,584M  Normal, Illinois
TA-W-33,584N  Nashville, Tennessee
TA-W-33,584O  Woodbridge, Virginia.''

    Signed at Washington D.C. this 24 day of September, 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-27076 Filed 10-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0421 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-042-AD 

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update 

accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection of Left 

Windshields 1.5 $ 127.50 $0 $ 127.50 664 $84,660.00

Inspection of Right 

Windshields 1.5 $ 127.50 $0 $ 127.50 664 $84,660.00

Replacement and 

Wiring Changes of 

Left Windshield, 

(including access, 

tests, & close)

8.5 $ 722.50 $19,687 $20,409.50 664 $13,551,908.

00

Replacement and 

Wiring Changes of 

Right Windshield, 

(including access,

tests, & close)

8.5 $ 722.50 $19,687 $20,409.50 664 $13,551,908.

00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $27,273,136

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs 

table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):Estimated cost 
of the “Top Kit” windshield replacement with pin/socket type and hydrophobic coating, is 

$16,480.00.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain

for either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements 

for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as

adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of SRA International, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stephen C. Hughes, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 15, 2007



/S/    STEPHEN C.
HUGHESStephen C. Hughes Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President Operations (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 316 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 25
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 316

  To repeal the authorizations for use of military force against Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 9, 2023

  Mr. Kaine (for himself, Mr. Young, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Grassley, Mr. 
 Durbin, Mr. Lee, Mr. Coons, Mr. Paul, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Daines, Ms. 
 Hirono, Mr. Marshall, Mr. King, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Moran, 
  Mr. Lujan, Ms. Collins, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Braun, Mr. Booker, Ms. 
 Lummis, Mr. Reed, Mr. Vance, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Schatz, and 
 Mrs. Shaheen) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

                             March 8, 2023

              Reported by Mr. Menendez, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the authorizations for use of military force against Iraq.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST 
              IRAQ RESOLUTION.

    The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution 
(Public Law 102-1; 105 Stat. 3; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby 
repealed.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ 
              RESOLUTION OF 2002.

    The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution 
of 2002 (Public Law 107-243; 116 Stat. 1498; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is 
hereby repealed.
                                                        Calendar No. 25

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 316

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To repeal the authorizations for use of military force against Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 8, 2023

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 12

                              Matrix Bancorp, Inc.

                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                                   (Unaudited)

                             (Dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<S>    <C>

                                                                         Year Ended December 31,
                                                     2004         2003          2002           2001           2000
                                                  -----------  ------------  ------------   ------------  ------------
A.  Matrix Bancorp, Inc. and  subsidiaries
    (consolidated)
Earnings:
    1.  Income (loss) before income taxes ...     $  32,119        (3,572)   $  (17,025)    $        5    $   10,038
    2.  Plus interest expense (A) ...........        32,273        32,910        42,306         65,884        68,089
                                                  -----------  ------------  ------------   ------------  ------------
    3.  Earnings including interest on deposits      64,392        29,338        25,281         65,889        78,127
    4.  Less interest on deposits............        10,665        13,339        21,496         34,872        26,275
                                                  -----------  ------------  ------------   ------------  ------------
    5.  Earnings excluding interest on deposits   $  53,727        15,999    $    3,785     $   31,017    $   51,852
                                                  ===========  ============  ============   ============  ============
Fixed Charges:
    6. Including interest on deposits excluding
          capitalized interest...............     $  32,273        32,910    $   42,306     $   66,119    $   68,218
    7.  Less interest on deposits (Line 4)...        10,665        13,339        21,496         34,872        26,275
                                                  -----------  ------------  ------------   ------------  ------------
    8.  Excluding interest on deposits.......     $  21,608        19,571    $   20,810     $   31,247    $   41,943
                                                  ===========  ============  ============   ============  ============
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges:
           Including interest on deposits
           (Line 3 divided by Line 6) .......          2.00x         0.89x         0.60x          1.00x         1.15x
           Excluding interest on deposits
           (Line 5 divided by Line 8) .......          2.49x         0.82x         0.18x          1.00x         1.24x

------------
(A) Includes amounts representing the estimated interest component of net rental payments.
</TABLE>