alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27157]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee will meet in 
closed session from 9 am until 4 pm, October 29, 1997 and from 9 am 
until 4 pm, October 30, 1997 in the Pentagon, Washington, DC.
    The mission of the Defense Policy Board is to provide the Secretary 
of Defense, Deputy Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of 
Defense for Policy with independent, informed advice and opinion 
concerning major matters of defense policy. At this meeting the Board 
will hold classified discussions on national security matters.
    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1982), it has been 
determined that this Defense Policy Board meeting concerns matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this meeting 
will be closed to the public.

    Dated: October 8, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-27157 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
### Magnitude and frequency of floods in the United States. Part 3-B. Cumberland and Tennessee River basins

By: Paul R. SpeerC. R. Gamble

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1676

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD 

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

 OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION

MEMORANDUM

 

SUBJECT: November 4, 2009 Meeting with General Motors (GM) 

FROM: Brian Nelson 

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0472 

DATE: March 15, 2010 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

On November 4, 2009, we met with GM to discuss air conditioning- and GHG-related topics in 

the September 28, 2009 Proposed Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Greenhouse Gas 

Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy. Topics included a general discussion 

of credits for reducing refrigerant leakage, credits for improving air conditioning system 

efficiency, and the A/C CO2 Idle Test. In addition, vehicle and engine technologies for reducing 

GHGs were discussed. 

Attendees from GM were: 

Barbara Kiss 

Ken Porrett 

Bill Saindon 

Fred Sciance 

Curtis Vincent 

Attendees from EPA were: 

William Charmley 

Tony Fernandez 

Ed Nam 

Brian Nelson 

Attendees from NHTSA were: 

 Kevin Green 

 Ryan Harrington 

Angel Jackson 

Greg Powell 

James Tamm 

Rebecca Yoon
Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacons in Maine

A Simple Approach to Promote this Safety Countermeasure

Sponsoring Agency: Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT)

Plan Date: 2017 and on-going 

Summary

Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) is 

one of MaineDOT’s most common pedestrian 

countermeasures. In addition to installing RRFBs 

through their typical project development process, 

the Department has reached out to communities 

to become partners in the installation and 

maintenance of the RRFB. MaineDOT created 

a single procurement-only contract for RRFBs 

where municipalities pay for installation outside 

the Federal contract, which allows MaineDOT 

to support the countermeasure and avoid the 

duplicative process associated with multiple 

Federal contracts. 

Highlights

MaineDOT’s Highway Safety Improvement Program 

(HSIP) involves the identification, analysis, and 

prioritization of problem safety areas and projects 

in alignment with the Strategic Highway Safety Plan 

(SHSP). Pedestrians and bicyclists are focus areas 

in the SHSP. MaineDOT requires that projects: be 

site specific or systemic, consistent with the SHSP, 

correct or improve a hazardous road location, and/

or address a highway safety problem. 

There are three ways an RRFB can be installed at a 

location in accordance with MaineDOT’s Crosswalk Policy as a part of the HSIP RRFB project.

1. Municipality participates in a crosswalks and sidewalks training course.

2. MaineDOT receives a specific request to install RRFB at an unsafe location and conducts a site review.

3. MaineDOT Pedestrian Forums, held by a team of experts in cities and towns across the State with high 

numbers of pedestrian crashes, identify an unsafe location and determine if an RRFB is an appropriate 

countermeasure. 

To encourage local agencies to be involved in the process, MaineDOT contracts exclusively for RRFBs for 

procurement. There is no construction phase included in the contract. RRFBs are installed outside the 

Federal contract with local forces using local funds. Communities are responsible for maintaining the RRFBs 

and a list of locations is kept by MaineDOT in accordance with the MUTCD Interim Approval (IA-21)1.

1 In March of 2018, FHWA announced that a RRFB patent dispute had been settled, allowing its production by all 

manufacturers. This led the Federal Highway Administration to issue Interim Approval (IA-21). All agencies must submit or resubmit requests to FHWA to use the RRFB following the standard interim approval process. FHWA-SA-18-054

Image Source: Toole Design

Activated Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacon
EXHIBIT 23.1



                  ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULES


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
CORT Business Services Corporation and subsidiary:

The audits  referred  to in our report  dated  February  12, 1999  included  the
related financial  statement schedules as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for
each of the years in the  three-year  period ended  December 31, 1998,  included
herein.  These  financial  statement  schedules  are the  responsibility  of the
Company's  management.  Our  responsibility  is to  express  an opinion on these
financial  statement  schedules  based  on  our  audits.  In our  opinion,  such
financial  statement  schedules,  when  considered  in  relation  to  the  basic
consolidated  financial  statements  taken as a  whole,  present  fairly  in all
material respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Forms
S-8 (Nos. 33-72724, 333-15611, 333-15613, 333-52641, 333-52643) of CORT Business
Services  Corporation  of our report dated  February  12, 1999,  relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of CORT Business Services Corporation and subsidiary
as of December 31, 1998 and 1997,  and the related  consolidated  statements  of
operations,  stockholders'  equity  and cash  flows for each of the years in the
three-year  period ended  December 31, 1998,  and all related  schedules,  which
reports  appear,  or are  incorporated  by  reference,  in the December 31, 1998
annual report on form 10-K of CORT Business Services Corporation.



                                        KPMG LLP


Washington, DC
March 31, 1999
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-0448 Directorate ID: 2007-SW-51-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model EC 120B Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 114 helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: This AD is prompted by an incident in which the pilot encountered a sudden restriction 

of the cyclic control movement during flight. 

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $50

Labor per Helicopter

(3 x $85/work-hour)

$255

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $305

Total US Fleet Cost $34,770

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Gary Roach
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2853 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

and the Secretary of Labor to conduct a study and 

issue a report on grant programs to support the nursing 

workforce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2853 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Train More Nurses 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REVIEW OF AND REPORT ON PROGRAMS SUP5 PORTING THE NURSING WORKFORCE. 

6 The Secretary of Health and Human Services and the 

7 Secretary of Labor, jointly, shall— 

8 (1) conduct a review of all grant programs car9 ried out by the Department of Health and Human 

10 Services or the Department of Labor that support 

11 the nurse workforce; and 

12 (2) not later than 1 year after the date of en13 actment of this Act, submit to Congress a report on 

14 the review under paragraph (1) that includes rec15 ommendations for changes to such grant programs 

16 to improve upon the goals of— 

17 (A) increasing nurse faculty, particularly 

18 in underserved areas; 

19 (B) providing pathways for nurses who 

20 have more than 10 years of clinical experience 

21 to become faculty at schools of nursing; and 
3 

†S 2853 ES

1 (C) encouraging and increasing the nurs2 ing pipeline through pathways for licensed prac3 tical nurses to become registered nurses. 

Passed the Senate January 24, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2853 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human 

support the nursing workforce. a study and issue a report on grant programs to Services and the Secretary of Labor to conduct
#### EQUILEASE CORPORATION, a subsidiary of Eltra Corp., a New York corporation, Appellant, v. Dr. Samuel L. CLIFFORD and Joseph Bobba, d/b/a Broadway Joe’s, Appellees.

No. 71-438.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 27, 1971.

Smith, Mandler, Smith & Parker, Joe N. Unger, Miami Beach, for appellant.

E. N. Stephens, Pensacola, for appellees.

Before SWANN, C. J., and HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

BARKDULL, Judge.

Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks interlocutory review of an order of the trial court transferring venue of the cause to the Circuit Court, First Judicial Circuit in and for Escambia County, Florida. The action in the trial court sought damages for breach of a lease. The order reads in part as follows:

“This Court finds that the Defendant is a resident of Escambia County, Florida, and has a right under Florida Statute 47.011, F.S.A. to be sued in the County where he resides, and therefore the Defendant’s Motion to transfer be and the same is hereby granted.”

* ‡ * * ‡

This is error. The plaintiff has the option to choose the forum; not the de*41fendant. And, if the cause of action arises in Dade County, he has a right to elect to proceed in the courts of said County. See: Greyhound Corporation v. Rosart, Fla.App.1960, 124 So.2d 708, wherein the following is found:

> 

> “In Florida, the election of venue is with the plaintiff and although it may be more convenient to the defendant and possibly to the plaintiff that the action be prosecuted in another county or circuit, nevertheless, if the election is one which the plaintiff has properly exercised under the statute, then the election still remains his and not one which can be dictated by the defendant. * * * To hold otherwise would be to nullify the venue statute which gives the plaintiff the right to file his action in a particular place under certain specified conditions.”

> >{« >Ji j{s i(i

Therefore, the order here under review be and the same is hereby reversed with directions to proceed with the matter.1

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

1

. The applicability of the doctrine of forum non conveniens, as recognized by § 47.122, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., was not presented in the trial court nor is the applicability of the doctrine reflected in the proceedings revealed by the record on appeal.
258 La. 342

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Henry BAPTISTE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 51263.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 7, 1971.

In re: Henry Baptiste applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. The showing made does not justify the exercise of our jurisdiction.

SUMMERS, J.,

is of the opinion the writ is properly denied. There is no allegation that an appeal would have resulted in a reversal of the conviction, McGarry v. Fogliana, 9 Cir., 370 F.2d 42.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion an evi-dentiary hearing is warranted.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27755]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: [62 FR 53040, 
October 10, 1997].

STATUS: Closed Meeting.

PLACE: 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

DATE PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED: October 7, 1997.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: Time Change/Deletions.
    The closed meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 14, 1997, at 
11:00 a.m. was changed to Tuesday, October 14, 1997, at 2:00 p.m. and 
the following items were not considered:
    Institution of injunctive actions.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact: The Office of the Secretary (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: October 15, 1997.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27755 Filed 10-15-97; 3:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
J. After considering "the canvass and the circumstances," the district court concluded that there was no evidence which suggested counsel "in any way" coerced Bennett into entering a plea and the record otherwise demonstrated that the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered. See Crawford, 117 Nev. at 721-22, 30 P.3d at 1125-26 ("To determine whether the defendant advanced a substantial, fair, and just reason to withdraw a plea, the district court must consider the totality of the circumstances to determine whether the defendant entered the plea voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently."). Our review of the record supports these determinations. See id. • at 722, 30 P.3d at 1126 ("A thorough plea canvass coupled with a detailed, consistent, written plea agreement supports a finding that the defendant entered the plea voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently."). Moreover, Bennett failed to demonstrate that counsel was ineffective. See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 58-59 (1985) (a petitioner must demonstrate that counsel's performance was deficient and but for counsel's errors he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial); Kirksey v. State, 112 Nev. 980, 988, 923 P.2d 1102, 1107 (1996). Accordingly, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Bennett's motion, and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Hardesty

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A 454M444

### cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Monique A. McNeill Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 

### 3
(0) 1947A
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3201 

To prohibit drilling in the Arctic Ocean. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2023 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. WARREN, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. WELCH, Mr. SANDERS, and Mr. MENENDEZ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit drilling in the Arctic Ocean. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Arctic Ocean 

5 Drilling Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN ARCTIC 

7 AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF. 

8 Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

9 (43 U.S.C. 1337) is amended by adding at the end the 

10 following: 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3201 IS

1 ‘‘(q) PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN

2 ARCTIC AREAS OF THE OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.— 

3 ‘‘(1) DEFINITION OF ARCTIC.—In this sub4 section, the term ‘Arctic’ has the meaning given the 

5 term in section 112 of the Arctic Research and Pol6 icy Act of 1984 (15 U.S.C. 4111). 

7 ‘‘(2) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other 

8 provision of this Act or any other law, the Secretary 

9 of the Interior shall not issue or extend a lease or 

10 any other authorization for the exploration, develop11 ment, or production of oil, natural gas, or any other 

12 mineral on Arctic areas of the outer Continental 

13 Shelf.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32





INSWEB CORPORATION





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of InsWeb Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to InsWeb Corporation, and will be retained by InsWeb Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ HUSSEIN A. ENANHussein A. EnanChairman and Chief Executive OfficerDated: November 10, 2009/s/ KIRAN RASARETNAMKiran RasaretnamChief Financial OfficerDated : November 10, 2009
<PAGE>
EXECUTED AS A DEED BUT NOT
DELIVERED UNTIL THE DATE
HEREOF by INVERESK RESEARCH LIMITED

acting by
/s/ Walter S. Nimmo          Director
____________________________
    Walter S. Nimmo          Full Name
____________________________
                             Director/Secretary
____________________________
                             Full Name
____________________________

EXECUTED AS A DEED BUT NOT
DELIVERED UNTIL THE DATE
HEREOF by INVERESK RESEARCH INC.

acting by
/s/ Walter S. Nimmo          Director
____________________________
    Walter S. Nimmo          Full Name
____________________________
/s/ Alastair S. McEwan       Director/Secretary
____________________________
    Alastair S. McEwan       Full Name
____________________________


EXECUTED AS A DEED BUT NOT
DELIVERED UNTIL THE DATE
HEREOF by CTBR BIO-RESEARCH INC.

acting by
/s/ Walter S. Nimmo          Director
____________________________
    Walter S. Nimmo          Full Name
____________________________
                             Director/Secretary
____________________________
                             Full Name
____________________________
#### CITY OF CORAL GABLES, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. CORAL GABLES WAR MEMORIAL YOUTH CENTER ASSOCIATION, a Florida corporation not for profit, Appellee.

No. 68-1036.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 29, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Key Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Phyllis C. Best, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Phyllis C. Best |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Phyllis C.  Best          |
| Chief  Financial Officer  |
| December 19,  2003        |

 

----