alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Potential Risk Factors

The systemic approach focuses on risk rather than exact locations. 

Once states identify a risk factor that involves a number of crashes, they can be 

proactive and fix the problem wherever that risk feature exists. Following is a list of potential risk factors where 

states may want to examine their crash database to determine whether there is a problem. 

Roadway and Intersection Features

 Number of lanes 

 Lane width 

 Shoulder surface width/type 

 Median width/type 

 Horizontal curvature, delineation, or advance warning 

 Horizontal curve and tangent speed differential 

 Roadside or edge hazard rating (potentially including sideslope design)

 Driveway density 

 Presence of shoulder or centerline rumble strips 

 Presence of lighting 

 Presence of on-street parking 

 Intersection skew angle 

 Intersection traffic control device 

 Number of signal heads versus number of lanes 

 Presence of backplates 

 Presence of advanced warning signs 

 Intersection located in/near horizontal curve 

 Presence of left-turn or right-turn lanes 

 Left-turn phasing 

 Allowance of right-turn-on-red 

 Overhead versus pedestal mounted signal heads 

 Pedestrian crosswalk presence, crossing distance, signal head type 

Traffic Volume

 Average daily traffic volumes 

 Average daily entering vehicles 

Other Features

 Posted speed limit or operating speed 

 Presence of nearby railroad crossing 

 Presence of automated enforcement 

 Adjacent land use type, such as schools, commercial, or alcohol-sales establishments 

 Location and presence of bus stops
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          99,244
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               173,295
<PP&E>                                       1,106,559
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,279,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,678
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,651
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,478,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,279,854
<SALES>                                        115,425
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,425
<CGS>                                           94,970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,455
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,455
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
SERVED: JANUARY 13, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS '' ^'^^-tJ OPEMwh 

WASHINGTON, DC 

'I'^ll MH 13 P 2^ 28 

INTHEMAITEROF 

AIR AMBULANCE BY AIR TREK, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penally Action) 

FDMSNO. FAA-201I-1003 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009EA030037) has been assigned 

to the undersigned. All iutiire pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding 

shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached 

Service List. 

Ron;l1e A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1003 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30 . 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1OOO' 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winlon, Esq., Respondenl's Counsel 

The Aviation Law Firm 

One Research Court, Suite 350 

RockviIle,MD 20850 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

Stephen W. Brice Esq., Complaiminf 's Counsel 

Eastern Region, AEA-7 

Fedeml Aviation Administration 

I Aviation Plaza, Room 561 

Jamaica. NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3268 

FAX: 718-533-5699 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use ihe following address: Federal 

Aviation Adniinistration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Wasliinglon, 

DC 20591; AiteiUion: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2701]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the Arts


Federal Advisory Committee on International Exhibitions Advisory 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Federal Advisory Committee on International Exhibitions will be 
held on February 11, 1997 from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. This meeting 
will be held in Room 716, at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20506.
    Portions of this meeting will be open to the public from 10:00 a.m. 
to 11:00 a.m. for welcome and introductions and from 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 
p.m. for a policy discussion.
    The remaining portion of this meeting from 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. 
is for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and 
recommendation on applications for financial assistance under the 
National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as 
amended, including information given in confidence to the agency by 
grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman 
of June 22, 1995, this session will be closed to the public pursuant to 
subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 5, United 
States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-5532, TDY-
TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC, 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: January 28, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-2701 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2981 

To require review of tax regulatory actions by the Office of Information 

and Regulatory Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Mr. LANKFORD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require review of tax regulatory actions by the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘IRS Accountability and 

5 Transparency Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. OIRA REVIEW OF TAX REGULATORY ACTIONS. 

7 Section 553 of title 5, United States Code, is amend8 ed by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(f)(1) In this subsection— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2981 IS

1 ‘‘(A) the term ‘regulatory action’ means 

2 any substantive action by an agency (normally 

3 published in the Federal Register) that promul4 gates or is expected to lead to the promulgation 

5 of a final rule, including notices of inquiry, ad6 vance notices of proposed rulemaking, and no7 tices of proposed rulemaking; and 

8 ‘‘(B) the term ‘tax regulatory action’ 

9 means a regulatory action issued by the Inter10 nal Revenue Service, whether pursuant to the 

11 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or with respect 

12 to any other United States Federal income, ex13 cise, estate, gift, or employment tax, that 

14 may— 

15 ‘‘(i) create a serious consistency or 

16 otherwise interfere with an action taken or 

17 planned by another agency; 

18 ‘‘(ii) raise novel legal or policy issues, 

19 such as by prescribing a rule of conduct 

20 backed by an assessable payment; or 

21 ‘‘(iii) have an annual non-revenue ef22 fect on the economy of $100,000,000 or 

23 more, measured against a no-action base24 line. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 2981 IS

1 ‘‘(2) Each tax regulatory action shall be subject to 

2 review by the Office of Information and Regulatory Af3 fairs, including compliance under section 6 of Executive 

4 Order 12866 (5 U.S.C. 601 note; relating to regulatory 

5 planning and review).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 8, 1997 / Presidential Documents 52477

Presidential Determination No. 97–39 of September 30, 1997

Delegation of Authority Under Section 1322(c) of the

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996

(Public Law 104–106)

Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United

States of America, I hereby delegate to the Secretary of Defense the duties

and responsibilities vested in the President by section 1322(c) of the National

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996 (‘‘the Act’’) (Public Law

104–106, 110 Stat. 478–479 (1996)).

The reporting requirement delegated by this memorandum may be redelegated not lower than the Under Secretary level. The Department of Defense

shall obtain concurrence on the report from the following agencies: the

Department of Commerce, the Department of State, the Department of the

Treasury, and the Director of Central Intelligence on behalf of the intelligence

community prior to submission to the Congress.

Any reference in this memorandum to the provisions of any Act shall

be deemed to be a reference to such Act or its provisions as may be

amended from time to time.

The Secretary of Defense is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register

œ–.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, September 30, 1997. [FR Doc. 97–26867

Filed 10–7–97; 8:45 am]

Billing code 5000–04–M
256 La. 63

#### CITY *OF*NEW ORLEANS v. Calvin RICHARDS.

No. 50604.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1970.

In re: Calvin Richards applying for stay of execution of sentence.

Application denied. The showing made does not warrant the relief sought.
Incorporation by Reference Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0560 July 8, 2010

The contents of the following dockets are he reby incorporated by re ference into and are considered to be included in, contained in and to have been placed in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR2010-0560 (Call for Information: Information on GHG Emissions from Bioenergy and Other Biogenic Sources):

1) EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0508 (Greenhous e Gas Reporting Program) 2) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0517 (Prevention of Signi ficant Deterioration and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule) 3) EPA- HQ–OAR–2005–0161 (Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Renewable Fuel Program)

Accessing dockets: Publicly available docket materials are available either el ectronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA’s Docket Center, P ublic Reading Room, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004. This Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, ex cluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Readi ng Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BERALDO FONSECA, )

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) Civil Action No. 05-351 ERIE

)

JAMES SHERMAN, Warden, )

Respondent. )

)

ORDER

AND NOW this 17th day of October, 2006, after consideration of the Petitioner’s 

Motion for Relief from Judgment (Doc # 23)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said Motion is DENIED 

 S/Sean J. McLaughlin 

Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: counsel/parties of record NK 

Case 1:05-cv-00351-SJM-SPB Document 24 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>


Norske Skog Canada Limited
9th Floor, 700 West Georgia Street
PO. Box 10058 Pacific Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada V7Y 1J7



memorandum                                                          NORSKECANADA

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
to                                                  date    November 21, 2001
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
from          Russell Horner                        fax     604-654-4145

email         russell.horner@norskecanada.com       phone   604-654-4000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear,

Following the acquisition of Pacifica Papers, our Board of Directors approved a
SPECIAL SYNERGY INCENTIVE PLAN FOR KEY MEMBERS OF OUR MANAGEMENT TEAM WHO WOULD
BE INSTRUMENTAL IN ACHIEVING SYNERGIES, AND WHO REMAIN IN THE EMPLOY OF THE
COMPANY UNTIL THE DATE OF PAYOUT. This Plan is in addition to Base Salary and
Variable Pay Plans.
Key aspects of the Plan would be as follows:

Target Payment                             60% of Base Salary as of payment date

Target Synergies                           $60 million per annum

Starting Date                              Date of closure

Payment                                    50% Cash
                                           50% Options


In addition to the base amount shown above, the Plan would pay an additional 15%
of target for every additional $10 million per annum in synergies achieved, to a
maximum of twice Base Salary. The earliest a payout would be made is one year
after the inception of the Plan. The calculation of synergies would be based on
cost savings to the Company as demonstrated in monthly run rates prior to the
payout.

The Incentive Plan is based on the payment of a base amount which is larger or
smaller, depending on how quickly the "base" $60 million in synergies is
achieved. The size of the base payment is fixed based on when $60 million is
achieved. If it takes more than 18 months, the base is zero. If it takes 18
months the base is 60% of target; if it takes 12 months, then the base is 100%
of target (or 60% of salary). Synergies in excess of $60 will trigger additional
payments of 15% of target per $10 million per annum additional synergy value
achieved by the end of 24 months. Hitting the target $60 million by 12 months
would also trigger the 100% payment at 12


<PAGE>

months, rewarding the speedy achievement of the company's goals with a quicker
payment of the base incentive. The Plan would be capped at 200% of target. A
table showing the potential payouts is attached.

I am pleased to include you in this Special Synergy Incentive Plan. You have
been identified as a key member of our team responsible for delivering an
important part of the identified synergies. Please remember that this Plan is
confidential. Any Plan member who breaches the confidentiality of this Plan will
be removed from the Plan, and will forfeit receipt of any payment from the Plan.



Regards,



Russell J. Homer
President and Chief Executive Officer



Encl.



RJH/ef
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 02-710.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Joint Strike Fighter Program 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the NETHERLANDS 

Supplementing the 

Memorandum of Understanding 

of January 17, 2001 

Signed at Soesterberg Airbase and 

Washington June 5 and 10, 2002 

 

with 

Annexes 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 NETHERLANDS 

Defense: Joint Strike Fighter Program 

 Agreement supplementing memorandum of 

 understanding of January 17, 2001. 

 Signed at Soesterberg Airbase and Washington 

 June 5 and 10, 2002; 

 Entered into force July 10, 2002. 

 With annexes.
EXHIBIT 10


EXHIBIT 10.2




Capco Energy, Inc.




Agreement










Dennis R. Staal shall serve as a Director of Capco Energy, Inc., Meteor Enterprises, Inc. and Jovian Energy, Inc. 




As compensation Mr. Staal shall receive $750 every other week, he and his dependents shall receive medical and health coverage, as provided to employees, at no cost to him or his dependents, he shall be entitled to the other non-cash benefits provided to outside directors of each company and he shall be reimbursed for expenses incurred in carrying out his duties as a director.




His initial non-cash benefit shall be an option to acquire 50,000 shares of Jovian Energy, Inc. exercisable at the public offering price, 25,000 shares shall vest immediately and 25,000 will vest at the end of one year, the option will be for a five-year period of time. He is also entitled to an option to acquire stock in any public spin-off or merger of the companies or their assets or subsidiaries, the terms of which will be mutually agreeable. 
















/s/ Ilyas Chaudhary 

/s/ Dennis R. Staal

Ilyas Chaudhary                                                               Dennis R. Staal




October 4, 2002

     October 4, 2002

Date                                                                                   Date
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, in connection  with the filing of the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the Fiscal  Year Ended  December  31,  2003 (the  "Report")  by
Tarrant Apparel Group ("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   to  the  best  of  my  knowledge,   the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
     requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934; and

2.   to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
     presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
     operations of Registrant.



Date:    April 7, 2004                      By:    /s/    Patrick Chow
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                          Patrick Chow,
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 vs. ) CR 12-38 

 ) 

SHANTELL JONES ) 

MEMORANDUM ORDER 

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for the Return of Property [ECF 73]. By 

this Motion, Defendant seeks the return of three items: (1) Samsung 4G; (2) LC Cellular Phone; 

and (3) Samsung Cellular Phone (“the Property”). The Government has indicated to the Court 

that it does not object to Defendant’s Motion. Accordingly, this 12th day of May, 2016, it is 

hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant’s Motion for the Return of 

Property [ECF 73] is GRANTED. 

It is further hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Government 

shall contact Defendant within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order to make the necessary 

arrangements for the Property to be released to an appropriate representative of Defendant. 

S/ Maurice B. Cohill, Jr. _______________ 

 Maurice B. Cohill, Jr. 

 Senior United States District Court Judge 

cc: Shantell Jones 

 FCI McKean 

P.O. Box 8000 

Bradford, PA 16701 

Case 1:12-cr-00038-DWA Document 75 Filed 05/12/16 Page 1 of 2
 

Case 1:12-cr-00038-DWA Document 75 Filed 05/12/16 Page 2 of 2
PUBLIC LAW 104–103—FEB. 8, 1996 110 STAT. 55

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2924 (S. 1555):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Feb. 1, considered and passed House and Senate.

WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 32 (1996):

Feb. 8, Presidential statement.

Æ

Public Law 104–103

104th Congress

An Act

To guarantee the timely payment of social security benefits in March 1996.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TIMELY PAYMENT OF MARCH 1996 SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS GUARANTEED.

(a) FINDINGS.— (1) Congress intends to pass an increase in the public

debt limit before March 1, 1996.

(2) In the interim, social security beneficiaries should be

assured that social security benefits will be paid on a timely

basis in March 1996.

(b) GUARANTEE OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFIT PAYMENTS.—In

addition to any other authority provided by law, the Secretary

of the Treasury may issue under chapter 31 of title 31, United

States Code, obligations of the United States before March 1, 1996,

in an amount equal to the monthly insurance benefits payable

under title II of the Social Security Act in March 1996. (c) OBLIGATIONS EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DEBT LIMIT.— (1) IN GENERAL.—Obligations issued under subsection (b)

shall not be taken into account in applying the limitation

in section 3101(b) of title 31, United States Code.

(2) TERMINATION OF EXEMPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall cease

to apply on the earlier of—

(A) the date of the enactment of the first increase

in the limitation in section 3101(b) of title 31, United

States Code, after the date of the enactment of this Act,

or

(B) March 15, 1996.

Approved February 8, 1996.

31 USC 3101

note.

Feb. 8, 1996

[H.R. 2924]