53610 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 199 / Wednesday, October 15, 1997 / Notices

protestants parties to the proceedings.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–27180 Filed 10–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP98–1–000]

Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation; Notice of Request Under

Blanket Authorization

October 8, 1997.

Take notice that on October 1, 1997,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia), P.O. Box 1273, Charleston,

West Virginia 25325–1273, filed in

Docket No. CP98–1–000 a request

pursuant to Sections 157.205 and

157.211 of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) for

authorization to construct and operate a

new point of delivery, located in Knox

County, Ohio, to Columbia Gas of Ohio

(COH), under Columbia’s blanket

certificate issued in Docket No. CP83–

76–000, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the

Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request that is on file with

the Commission and open to public

inspection.

Columbia proposes to construct and

operate an additional point of delivery

of COH, in Knox County, Ohio and to

reassign a portion of the Maximum

Daily Delivery Obligation (MMDO) from

an existing point of delivery to COH and

institute a corresponding reduction at

an existing point of delivery. Columbia

states that as part of the firm

transportation service to be provided,

COH has requested that its existing

Storage Service Transportation

Agreement be amended by increasing

the MMDO by 350 Dth/day at the

proposed new point of delivery and

reducing the MMDOs at the existing

point of delivery by 350 Dth/day.

Columbia estimates annual quantities of

natural gas to be delivered at the new

point of delivery to be 30,600 Dth

annually.

Columbia asserts the end use of the

new point of delivery will be industrial

and utilized to serve a grain dryer

operation. Columbia states the

interconnecting and appurtenant

facilities required to establish the new

delivery point are estimated to cost

$14,000, with COH reimbursing

Columbia 100% of the total cost of the

proposed construction.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–27175 Filed 10–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP97–542–001]

Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation; Notice of Proposed

Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

October 8, 1997.

Take notice that on October 2, 1997,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia) tendered for filing as part of

its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised

Volume No. 1, the following revised

tariff sheet to become effective October

1, 1997:

[Substitute Twenty-First Revised Sheet No.

25]

On September 30, 1997, Columbia

filed revised tariff sheets, in Docket No.

RP97–542–000, to remove the SFC

charge from its rates effective October 1,

1997. However, subsequent to that

filing, Columbia has determined that it

made an inadvertent error in Footnote 5

on Twenty-First Revised Sheet No. 25.

The incremental surcharge applicable to

the former X–70 Rate Schedule did not

reflect the adjustment for the removal of

the SFC rate component, but should

have. Therefore, as shown on Substitute

Twenty-First Revised Sheet No. 25, the

instant filing incorporates a revision to

Footnote 5 to reflect the removal of the

SFC rate component.

Columbia states further that copies of

this filing have been mailed to all of its

customers, affected state regulatory

commissions, and all parties in Docket

No. RP95–408, et al proceedings.

Any person desiring to protest this

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with Section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed as provided in Section 154.210 of

the Commission’s Regulations. Protests

will be considered by the Commission

in determining the appropriate action to

be taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Copies of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the Public Reference

Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–27202 Filed 10–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. TM98–2–2–000]

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company;

Notice of Compliance Filing

October 8, 1997.

Take notice that on October 2, 1997

East Tennessee Natural Gas Company

(East Tennessee) submitted Thirteenth

Revised Sheet No. 4 for inclusion in

East Tennessee’s FERC Gas Tariff,

Second Revised Volume No. 1. East

Tennessee Tendered this revised tariff

sheet as its Annual Transportation Cost

Rate Adjustment (TCRA) filing to revise

the TCRA commodity surcharge under

Rate Schedules FT–A and FT–GS. East

Tennessee requests an effective date of

November 1, 1997.

East Tennessee states that Thirteenth

Revised Sheet No. 4 reflects changes to

its TCRA pursuant to Section 25 of the

General Terms and Conditions of its

tariff.

East Tennessee states that copies of

the filing have been mailed to all

affected customers and state regulatory

commissions.

Any person desiring to protest with

reference to said filing should file a

protest with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First

Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20426 in

accordance with Section 385.211 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations.

All such protests must be filed in

accordance with Section 154.210 of the