alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6283

JOHN RICHARD NEWSOME,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

REGINALD FLOYD; K. JEFFORDS; C. SPAZIANI,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

R. Bryan Harwell, Senior District Judge. (4:23-cv-03968-RBH)

Submitted: July 25, 2024 Decided: July 30, 2024

Before GREGORY, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Richard Newsome, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6283 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/30/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

John Richard Newsome appeals the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Newsome’s amended 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b). 

Limiting our review of the record to the issues raised in Newsome’s informal briefs, we

find no reversible error. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 

177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit 

rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s judgment. Newsome v. Floyd, No. 4:23-cv-03968-RBH (D.S.C. 

Mar. 18, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6283 Doc: 9 Filed: 07/30/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.2


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



                  KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Allan R. Raphael
constitutes and appoints Jeffrey A. Montgomery and Gregory M. Yulish, and each
of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place, and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective
amendments) to this Form 10-KSB, and to file same, with all exhibits thereto,
and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the foregoing, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitute, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


          /s/  Allan R. Raphael             Director          March 28, 1997
------------------------------------------
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TONY PUNCH, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No. 12-154E

)

v. ) Judge Cathy Bissoon

) Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter

DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Having carefully reviewed all of the relevant materials, the Court concludes that 

Magistrate Judge Baxter’s rulings regarding the medical/educational records of Plaintiffs’ other 

children were neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Accordingly, Dollar Connection’s 

Objections (Doc. 128) are OVERRULED, and Judge Baxter’s rulings are AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

July 21, 2015 s\Cathy Bissoon

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge

cc (via ECF email notification):

All Counsel of Record

Case 1:12-cv-00154-CB-SPB Document 129 Filed 07/21/15 Page 1 of 1
254 La. 646

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles Ray MERGE.

No. 50118.

Supremo Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 17, 1969.

In re: Charles R. Merge applying for writ of mandamus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
Exhibit 31.2
                           Section 302 Certifications

I, Mark Scott, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;

   b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5, 2003)];
and

   c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this Quarterly Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this Quarterly Report based on such evaluation; and

     d) disclosed in this Quarterly Report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  May 17, 2004                    /s/ Mark Scott
                                       -------------------
                                       Mark Scott
                                       Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement No. 333-149486 on Form F-3 of our report dated June 29, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements of YPF SOCIEDAD ANONIMA (YPF), which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph stating that the accounting principles generally accepted in Argentina vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, that the information relating to the
nature and effect of such differences is presented in Notes 13, 14, and 15 to the consolidated financial statements of YPF, and of our report dated June 29, 2009, relating to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of YPF for the year ended December 31, 2008.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Buenos Aires, Argentina
|June 29, 2009          
|                       
|Deloitte & Co. S.R.L.  
|                       
|/s/ Ricardo C. Ruiz    
|Ricardo C. Ruiz        
|Partner
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-12-0000036 

25-SEP-2014 

08:16 AM 

SCWC-12-0000036
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR


STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION TRUST 2006-WF1,


Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,
 

vs.
 

ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF MAKAHA VALLEY PLANTATION,


Respondent/Defendant-Appellant,
 

and
 

JOHN ROBERT BAUTISTA; MAUREEN PALANGGOY BAUTISTA; MORTGAGE


ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.,


Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-12-0000036; CIV. NO. 09-1-2489)
 

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the abovereferenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court 

of Appeals at the time the application for certiorari was filed, 

see Hawai'i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2013); see also 

Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012), 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s application for
 

writ of certiorari, filed September 22, 2014, is dismissed
 

without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP
 
Rule 40.1(a) (2014) (“The application shall be filed within
 

thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of
 

appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time
 

for filing the application is extended in accordance with this
 

rule.”).
 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, September 25, 2014. 

Robert E. Chapman

and Mary Martin


for petitioner
 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald


/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
 

2
EXHIBIT 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)


     Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of
the  undersigned  officers  of  Sunland  Entertainment  Co.,  Inc.,  a  Delaware
corporation (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify with respect to the Amendment
No. 2 to the Annual  Report of the Company on Form  10-KSB/A  for the year ended
December  31, 2002 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the
"10-KSB/A Report") that:

(1)  the 10-KSB/A  Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the 10-KSB/A Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.




Date:  August 1, 2003                      /s/ David Weiner
                                          ------------------------------
                                             Co-President






Date:  August 1, 2003                      /s/ Gary Freeman
                                          ------------------------------
                                             Gary Freeman
                                             Chief Financial Officer and
                                             Corporate Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52704-52705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26749]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-2-110-000]


Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

October 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 30, 1997, Iroquois Gas Transmission 
System, L.P. (Iroquois) tendered for filing Eighteenth Revised Sheet 
No. 4 to its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1. The proposed 
effective

[[Page 52705]]

date of this revised tariff sheet is November 1, 1997.
    Iroquois states that pursuant to Part 154 of the Commission's 
Regulations and Section 12.3 of the General Terms and Conditions of its 
tariff, Iroquois is filing the referenced tariff sheet and supporting 
workpapers as part of its annual update of its Deferred Asset Surcharge 
to reflect the annual revenue requirement associated with its Deferred 
Asset for the amortization period commencing November 1, 1997. The 
revised tariff sheet reflects a decrease of $.0001 per Dth in Iroquois 
effective Deferred Asset Surcharge for Zone 1 (from $.0008 to $.0007 
per Dth) and an increase in the Zone 2 surcharge of $.0001 per Dth 
(from $.0006 to $.0007 per Dth). The Inter-Zone surcharge of $.0015 per 
Dth remains unchanged.
    Iroquois states that copies of its filing were served on all 
jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedures. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26749 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[104th Congress Public Law 175]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ175.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 1556]]

Public Law 104-175
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To authorize a circuit judge who has taken part in an in banc hearing of 
   a case to continue to participate in that case after taking senior 
   status, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Aug. 6, 1996 -  [S. 531]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    The last sentence of section 46(c) of title 28, United States Code, 
is amended by inserting ``(1)'' after ``eligible'' and by inserting 
before the period at the end of the sentence ``, or (2) to continue to 
participate in the decision of a case or controversy that was heard or 
reheard by the court in banc at a time when such judge was in regular 
active service''.

    Approved August 6, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 531:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-697 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 141 (1995):
                                    Sept. 28, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.
                                                        Vol. 142 (1996):
                                    July 29, considered and passed 
                                        House.

                                  <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, in connection  with the filing of the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the Year Ended  December  31,  2006 (the  "Report")  by Tarrant
Apparel Group ("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.


Date:    March 27, 2007              By:    /s/ Gerard Guez
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Gerard Guez,
                                            Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000904979
<NAME> SHILOH CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         191,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               50,151,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                   849,554
<INVENTORY>                                 31,148,360
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            85,783,063
<PP&E>                                     248,908,808
<DEPRECIATION>                              61,730,042
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             289,626,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       40,299,841
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       130,387
<OTHER-SE>                                 146,488,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               289,626,230
<SALES>                                    273,161,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           273,161,251
<CGS>                                      214,343,391
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              239,900,228
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (726,120)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,219,003
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             31,768,140
<INCOME-TAX>                                11,674,793
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         20,093,347
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                20,093,347
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.54
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

 

FORM N-CSR

 

| Investment Company Act file number | 811-5896 |
|------------------------------------|----------|

 

DWS Target Fund

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

 (Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

 

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190

 

Paul Schubert

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10154-0004

(Name and Address of Agent for Service)

 

| Date of fiscal year end: | 07/31 |
|--------------------------|-------|

 

| Date of reporting period: | 07/31/08 |
|---------------------------|----------|

 

 

**ITEM 1.**           **REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS**

 

 

----
1

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EDWARD J. MCNATT, )

Petitioner, )

v. ) C.A. No. 04-225 Erie

) District Judge McLaughlin

PA BD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, ) Magistrate Judge Baxter

Respondent. )

O R D E R

On August 14, 2004, Petitioner, a prisoner appearing pro se, filed the instant petition for

writ of habeas corpus. This matter was assigned to United States District Judge Sean J.

McLaughlin and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and

Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

By Order dated July 12, 2005, Petitioner was directed to show cause for his failure to

cooperate with the U.S. Marshal Service to serve this case. Document # 7. Petitioner responded

explaining that there had been a mixup over payments at the Marshal Service with several of his

cases. This Court responded giving Petitioner until August 10, 2005 to provide proof of

payment of the service fees in this case. Petitioner did not respond by August 10, 2005.

On August 11, 2005, this Court issued a Report and Recommendation recommending the

dismissal of this matter for failure to prosecute. Document # 9. Petitioner filed Objections to

the Report and Recommendation requesting that he have until August 22, 2005 to provide proof

of payment of the service fees. 

As of today’s date, Petitioner has still not provided this Court with proof of his

cooperation with the U.S. Marshal Service. This case is over a year old and Petitioner has taken

Case 1:04-cv-00225-SJM-SPB Document 11 Filed 09/06/05 Page 1 of 2
2

none of the initial steps to accomplish service.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of September, 2005;

Following a de novo review of the record in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

the Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Baxter is adopted as the opinion of this

Court. This case is dismissed without prejudice due to Petitioner’s failure to prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Courts close this case.

S/ Sean J. McLaughlin 

SEAN J. MCLAUGHLIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:04-cv-00225-SJM-SPB Document 11 Filed 09/06/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Technest Holdings, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
do hereby certify, to their best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Gino M.
      Pereira
            /s/ Nitin V.
      KotakGino
      M. Pereira
            Nitin
      V. KotakChief
      Executive Officer
            Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
      February 19, 2008
            Date:
      February 19, 2008
CONFIDENTIAL

{

 1