alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52683-52684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26715]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[A-533-809]


Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges From India; Extension of 
Time Limit for New Shipper Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Extension of time limit for new shipper antidumping duty 
administrative review of certain forged stainless steel flanges from 
India.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is extending 
the time limit for the preliminary results of the new shipper 
antidumping duty administrative review of the antidumping order on 
certain forged stainless steel flanges from India. This review covers 
one manufacturer and exporter of the subject merchandise, Panchmahal 
Steels, Ltd., for the period February 1, 1996 through January 31, 1997. 
This extension is made pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (``the Act''), and the Department's

[[Page 52684]]

regulations as published in the Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60 FR 
25130).

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 9, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Killiam, Alain Letort or John 
R. Kugelman, AD/CVD Enforcement Group III--Office 8, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington D.C. 
20230, telephone (202) 482-2704, 482-4243 or 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department initiated this new shipper 
review on May 2, 1997 (62 FR 24088). The current deadline for the 
preliminary results is October 27, 1997. Pursuant to 19 CFR 
Sec. 353.22(h)(7), the Department has determined that this case is 
extraordinarily complicated and, therefore, is extending the deadline 
for issuing the preliminary results. This extension is necessary to 
provide the Department additional time to consider certain issues of 
complex nature, including whether certain transactions were home-
market, third-country, or U.S. sales, and the nature of home-market 
customers (e.g., producers, end-users, or resellers to the United 
States).
    In accordance with 19 CFR Sec. 353.22(h)(7), the Department will 
extend the time limit for completion of the preliminary results of this 
new shipper review to no later than January 27, 1998. We plan to issue 
the final results within 90 days after the date the preliminary results 
are issued.
    This extension of time limit is in accordance with section 
751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act.

    Dated: September 29, 1997.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary AD/CVD Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 97-26715 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   Exhibit 10.35



June 19, 1997


Mr. Daniel J. O'Leary
5221 Oyster Bay Drive
Boardman, Ohio 44512

Dear Dan:

         I wish to confirm to you our offer of employment with Pueblo
International, Inc. (the "Company") as Executive Vice President - Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer effective June 24, 1997, reporting to me. Your
base salary will at the rate of $225,000 per year payable in accordance with
the Company's normal payroll practices and you will be eligible for a target
bonus of forty percent of your base salary subject to achieving certain fiscal
1999 budget objectives and in accordance with the company's annual Key
Management Incentive Bonus Plan. For the period from your date of employment
until the Company's 1998 fiscal year end (last Saturday in January 1998) you
will receive a guaranteed bonus for this period equivalent to forty percent of
the base salary received. You will further be eligible to participate in all
executive benefit programs other than the Company's LTIP (Long Term Incentive
Program), and receive an automobile allowance. The Company's relocation policy
will be available to assist you in relocating to Pompano Beach area, where your
position will be based. You will be responsible for all financial and
information systems functions.

         By your coming on board I will have rounded out a strong management
team that will take the company to new growth and performance levels. I look
forward to seeing you on the twenty fourth. Best regards.


Sincerely,



William T. Keon, III
President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**








**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**


**(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003)**





I, Donald R. Katz, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of Audible, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 of the Registrant (the "Report"):





| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) [15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




August 13, 2004
By:
/s/ Donald R. KatzDonald R. Katz
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 29, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

06-20202 Summary Calendar

MAXINE NICHOLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. SPRING SAND & CLAY LP, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas, Houston

4:04-cv-01601

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appellant appeals pro se from a jury verdict in favor of her employer in a discrimination case. Appellant points to no error. There is no legal argument or citation in the brief—only general conclusions. Although this Court liberally construes the briefs of pro se appellants, we also require that arguments be briefed to be preserved. Price v. Digital Equip. Corp. , 846 F.2d 1026, 1028 (5th2

Cir. 1988) (citations omitted). Accordingly, Appellant has abandoned her arguments by failing to argue them in the body of her brief. Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993) (citing Fed.R.App.P. 28(a)(4)). In addition, to the extent her brief reflects her disappointment with counsel, the Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not apply to civil proceedings. Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986). AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,880
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,748
<ALLOWANCES>                                      ( 41)

<INVENTORY>                                      1,458
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   426
<PP&E>                                           1,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (627)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,805
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,339
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,428
<SALES>                                         58,062
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,062     
<CGS>                                           47,549    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,698
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,530 
<INCOME-TAX>                                       620
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       910
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FREDERICK B. WILLIAMS, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-177 Erie

v. )

)

JAMES SHERMAN, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on June 7, 2005,

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 11], filed on

October 27, 2005, recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 4]

be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file

objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondent. 

Petitioner filed objections on November 10, 2005 [Doc. No. 12]. After de novo review of

the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation

and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 14th day of November, 2005;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 4]

is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 11] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on October 27, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00177-SJM-SPB Document 13 Filed 11/14/05 Page 1 of 1
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A1 00 2 . ROBERT DEREK BAI LEY v . RHONDA BUNN BAI LEY.

Ro b ert D erek Bai l ey fi l ed a p ro se n o t ice of ap p eal o f t h e p art i es ’ fi n al
ju d g m en t an d d ecree o f d i v o rce. W e l a c k j uri s d i ct i o n b ecau s e

— p ret erm i t t i n g
wh et h er t h e n o t i ce o f ap p eal w a s a n u l l i t y o n t h e b as i s th at M r. Bai l ey was

rep res en t ed b y co u ns el w h en h e fi l ed i t

, s ee To l b er t v. To o l e , 2 9 6 G a. 3 5 7, 3 6 1 -3 6 3
(3 ) (7 6 7 SE2 d 2 4 ) (2 01 4 ); Ja co b s en v. Ha l di

, 2 10 G a. A p p

. 81 7

, 8 1 8 -8 1 9 (1 ) (4 3 7

SE2 d 8 1 9 ) (1 99 3)

— ap p eal s fro m “ ju d g m en t s o r o rd ers i n d i v orce, al i m o n y , an d

o t h er d om es t i c rel at i o n s cas es ” m u s t b e m ad e b y ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (2 ). “ [C] o m p l i an ce wi th t h e d i s cret i o n ary ap peal s p r o c e d u r e i s ju ri s d i c t i o n a l .” Fa b e v. Fl o yd

, 1 9 9 Ga. Ap p

. 3 2 2

, 3 3 2 (1 ) (4 0 5 SE2 d 2 6 5 ) (1 9 9 1 ).

M r. Bai l ey ’ s fai l u re t o fo l l o w t h e d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal s pro ced u re d ep ri v es u s o f
ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h is d i rect ap p eal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. March 12, 2021

03/12/2021
#### Willie Mae ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2402.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 16, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 20, 1978.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Charles D. Peters, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Harry M. Hipler and Kenneth Spillias, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellant was indicted for murder in the First Degree and convicted of murder in the Second Degree after a jury trial. As tenuous as it might have been the appellant had a defense of justifiable homicide to present to the jury. She testified as to her acting in self defense, which, if sufficiently established, can permit the jury to acquit under the definition of justifiable homicide. *362After she testified the court ruled she could not present her witnesses as to the violent character and reputation of the deceased and she would not be permitted to have the jury charged on the law of justifiable homicide. It is noted, however, the court did charge the jury on justifiable homicide.1 It was error for the trial judge to on the one hand disallow the appellant from presenting her witnesses’ testimony about the character and propensities of the deceased and then charge the jury that it may consider evidence of the character of the deceased. The error was not the giving of the charge but the disallowing of the testimony. The judgment and sentence are reversed and the matter remanded for new trial. *Palm v. State,*135 Fla. 258, 184 So. 881 (1938); *Garner v. State,*28 Fla. 113, 9 So. 835 (1891); *Banks v. State,*351 So.2d 1071 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); *Coker v. State,*212 So.2d 648 (Fla. 1 DCA 1968); *Cole v. State,*193 So.2d 47 (Fla. 1 DCA 1966).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LETTS, J., and BLACK, SUSAN H., Associate Judge, concur.

1

. It is further noted neither the appellant’s nor the appellee’s brief indicate appellate counsel were aware of this fact. One of the principal errors alleged was the failure to give that instruction.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2684]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency Recordkeeping/Reporting Requirements Under Emergency 
Review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

    Title: Standard Federally-approved form for use by the State Child 
Support Enforcement (CSE) programs: ``Notice of Interstate Lien''.
    OMB No.: New.
    Description: PRWORA '96 (P.L. 104-193), section 324, requires the 
Secretary of DHHS to promulgate an interstate lien form to be used by 
the State CSE programs to secure delinquent child support obligations.
    Respondents: States, Guam, Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico and District 
of Columbia.
    Annual Burden Estimates:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          Number of                             
                                                            Number of     responses      Average    Total burden
                       Instrument                          respondents       per      burden hours      hours   
                                                                         respondent   per response              
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interstate lien.........................................       53,254             1           .25        13,313 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 13,313.
    Additional Information: ACF is requesting that OMB grant a 180 day 
approval for this information collection under procedures for emergency 
processing by February 28, 1997. A copy of this information collection, 
with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by calling 
the Administration for Children and Families, Reports Clearance 
Officer, Douglas J. Godesky at (202) 401-4852.
    Comments and questions about the information collection described 
above should be directed to the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for ACF, Office of Management and 
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, 
DC 20503, (202) 395-7316.

    Dated: January 29, 1997.
Douglas J. Godesky,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-2684 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2615]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

The National Partnership Council; Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

.ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TIME AND DATE: 1 p.m., February 12, 1997.

PLACE: OPM Conference Center, Room 1350, Theodore Roosevelt Building, 
1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415-0001. The conference center is 
located on the first floor.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public. Seating will be 
available on a first-come, first-served basis. Individuals with special 
access needs wishing to attend should contact OPM at the number shown 
below to obtain appropriate accommodations.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The National Partnership Council (NPC) will 
receive a briefing on the status of career transition services to 
Federal employees. Also, there will be a presentation of the NPC 
Project Team plan for working with labor-management partnerships that 
are facing difficulties, and a presentation on the findings of the 
Senior Executives Association survey of senior executives in the 
Federal Government.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Michael Cushing, Director, Center 
for Partnership and Labor-Management Relations, Office of Personnel 
Management, Theodore Roosevelt Building, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 7H28, 
Washington, DC 20415-0001, (202) 606-0010.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We invite interested persons and 
organizations to submit written comments. Mail or deliver your comments 
to Michael Cushing at the address shown above. To be considered at the 
February 12 meeting, written comments should be received by February 7.

Office of Personnel Management.
James B. King,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-2615 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Hooker Furniture Corporation (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul B. Toms, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                                          
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: April 5, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Paul B. Toms, Jr.
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                       | 
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Paul B. Toms, Jr. Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*	CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY 
WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A 
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST.


January 8, 1997
Our Ref: B96-7701-RJTL-RJ0350-004


Atlantic Coast Airlines
1 Export Drive, 
Sterling, Virginia,
U.S.A. 20164


Gentlemen,

Letter Agreement No. 004 to Purchase Agreement No. RJ-0350 dated January 8, 
1997 (the "Agreement" between Bombardier Inc. ("BRAD") and Atlantic Coast 
Airlines ("Buyer") relating to the purchase of twelve (12) Canadair Regional 
Jet Aircraft (the "Aircraft")


Subject:		Options

1.0	This letter constitutes an integral part of the Agreement and evidences 
our further agreement with the matters set forth below.  All terms used 
herein and in the Agreement and not defined herein, shall have the same 
meaning as in the Agreement.

2.0	*


*
[TWO PAGES OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS OMITTED]



5.0	*




Should there be any inconsistency between this Letter Agreement and the 
Agreement with respect to the subject matter covered by the terms hereof, then 
this Letter Agreement shall prevail.


Yours truly,
BOMBARDIER INC.



________________________				Date:_____________
Michel Bourgeois
Vice President, Contracts 





Acknowledged and Accepted


Atlantic Coast Airlines



________________________				Date:_____________
James B. Glennon
Sr. Vice President and C.F.O.

 

 
[Footnote continued from previous page]

[Footnote continued on next page]

3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19
- 0 3 50 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL JOSEPH CROWELL,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 2 0 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 14 2020

09/14/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0350