alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Memorandum

Subject: INFORMATION: Change to the December 31,

2018 sunset date in the AASHTO/FHWA Joint 

Implementation Agreement for the AASHTO 

Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, 2016 

Edition

Date: 

From: Michael S. Griffith

Director, Office of Safety Technologies 

In Reply Refer To: 

HSST-1 

To: Division Administrators

Directors of Field Services

Federal Lands Highway Division Directors 

PURPOSE

The purpose of this memorandum is to announce exceptions to the December 31, 2018 

sunset date for cable barriers and cable barrier terminals relative to implementing the 

AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH), 2016 Edition. 

INFORMATION

AASHTO and FHWA release the following change to the AASHTO/FHWA Joint 

Implementation Plan for implementing AASHTO MASH, 2016 Edition. The change 

extends the deadline date for cable barriers and cable barrier terminals to December 31, 

2019 as described below.

What is included in the December 31, 2018 sunset date in the AASHTO/FHWA 

Joint Implementation Agreement? 

The AASHTO/FHWA Joint Implementation Agreement states that for contracts on the 

National Highway System with a letting date after December 31, 2018, new permanent 

installations and full replacements of cable barriers, cable barrier terminals and crash 

cushions must be MASH 2016-compliant. This sunset date now only covers crash 

cushions. Cable barriers and cable barrier terminals are now included in the December 

31, 2019, sunset date for “all other longitudinal barriers” and “all other terminals.” 

This change supplements the Q&A document dated May 9, 2018 entitled “Clarifications 

on Implementing the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, 2016.” This 

information, along with additional MASH implementation resources, may be accessed 

at: https://design.transportation.org/mash-implementation/. 
2 

SUMMARY

Please share this memorandum with your State DOT. AASHTO and FHWA will 

continue to monitor the implementation of AASHTO’s MASH and will provide 

clarification and changes as needed on the above referenced website. If you need 

further information, please contact William P. Longstreet at 202-366-0087.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Louis J. CARMOUCHE.

No. 60970.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

In re: Louis J. Carmouche, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for stay order.

*705Writ denied. There is some evidence to support probable cause for the arrest. This Court does not weigh the sufficiency of the evidence.

DIXON, J.,

dissents. The attempted arrest by the officer was clearly unjustified.

CALOGERO, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
1

Ostigaard, Crystal

From: Robert Merchant [merch57@gmail.com]

Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 4:11 PM

To: Ostigaard, Crystal

Subject: Designate Yellowstone County, Montana, as a non-attainment area for air quality.

Dear Ms. Ostigaard, 

 

As a physician specializing in lung disease in Billings, MT I care for many people who are adversely impacted 

by the air quality here. The research data is very clear that even SO2 at levels deemed acceptable by EPA 

standards are causing harm. It is therefor extremely important that the current standards be enforced. The 2010 

data can not be ignored. Yellowstone County should be designated as in non-attainment in locations where 

2009 to 2011 show one hour violations. All the areas with SO2 violations should be included in the nonattainment areas. 

 

The EPA has done a incredible job safeguarding our health. Thank you for your work and efforts. 

 

Sincerely, 

Robert K. Merchant, M.D. 

3270 Gregory Dr. W. 

Billings, MT 59102 

406-652-6420
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TransDigm Holding
Company (the Company) for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended June 26, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory Rufus, Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the
Company for the periods indicated.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 5, 2004



/s/ Gregory RufusTitle:

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary
O rder filed July 22 , 202 1



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________


### No. 11

- 2 0

- 00 225

- C R

__________



### ROCKY DEE HIDROGO, JR., A ppellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 220th District Court Comanche County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR03104

O R D E R
After a careful review of the record, Appellant, Rocky Dee Hidrogo , Jr.’s
appointed counsel, E. Alan Bennett, determined that this appeal presents no issues of
arguable merit. Mr. Bennett filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 385 U.S.
738, 744 (1967), and a motion to withdraw. We grant the moti on.

PER CURIAM
July 22, 2021

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
Trotter

, J. , and Williams , J.
SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY CONVERSION

INJURY CODE CONVERSION DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Suspected Serious Injury 2006 - Present An injury is bodily harm to a person. This excludes effects of diseases such as stroke, heart 

attack, diabetic coma, or epileptic seizure.

Guide to MN Crash Data Files 2006,

MN Law Enforcement Accident Report 

Instruction Manual 2003

A – Incapacitating injury A

An incapacitating injury is any injury, other than a fatal injury, which prevents the injured 

person from walking, driving or normally continuing the activities the person was capable of 

performing before the injury occurred

Inclusions: Severe lacerations, broken or distorted limbs, skull or chest injuries, abdominal 

injuries, unconsciousness at or when taken from the accident scene, unable to leave the 

accident scene without assistance

Exclusions: momentary unconsciousness

16. Injury Severity

codes found on Data Files pg22 

(PDF pg33), 

definitions found on pg62 (PDF 

pg64).

PEDESTRIAN AND PEDALCYCLIST (NON-MOTORIZED) CONVERSION

PERSON TYPE CODE STATE DEFINITIONS / INSTRUCTIONS / NOTES SOURCE LOCATION

Pedestrian 2006 - Present

MN Guide To Crash Data Files 2006,

MN Accident Report Instruction Manual 

2003,

MN Accident Report 2003

Pedestrian 51 any other person who is in the crash but who is not in or on a motor vehicle (e.g.: persons in 

wheelchairs, horseback riders, and so on). 17. Vehicle Type

code found on Data Files pg23 (PDF 

pg25), Manual pg28 (PDF pg30), 

definition found on pg17 (PDF 

pg28). 

Skater 52 No definition found. 17. Vehicle Type code found on Data Files pg23 (PDF 

pg25), Manual pg28 (PDF pg30)

Pedalcyclist 2006 - Present

Bicyclist 53 No definition found. 17. Vehicle Type code found on Data Files pg23 (PDF 

pg25), Manual pg28 (PDF pg30)

Minnesota
Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Technest Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of
the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:  November __, 2003                                 By:/s/ MARK ALLEN
                                                            --------------------
                                                                Mark Allen,
                                                                Director
#### Elijah BIVENS, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 71-239.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 13, 1971.

Habeas corpus denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27780]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-9-002]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 15, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 10, 1997, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised, Volume No. 1, Sub Ninth Revised Sheet No. 26, 
with an effective date of October 1, 1997.
    Tennessee states that this tariff sheet is filed in compliance with 
the Commission's September 29, 1997 Order of the Director Accepting, 
Rejecting and Allowing Withdrawal of Tariff Sheets in the above-
referenced dockets. (September 29 Order). Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company, 80 FERC para. 62,290 (1997). In the September 29, Order, the 
Commission directed Tennessee to file substitute tariff sheets to 
reflect the Commission's rejection of Ninth Revised Sheet No. 26 and 
First Revised Sheet No. 26A.1 in Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, 80 
FERC para. 61,256 (1997). In accordance with the September 29 Order, 
Tennessee requests an effective date of October 1, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
this proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27780 Filed 10-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Hubert Jerome ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-406.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 18, 1969.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Russell E. Seay, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
From: Ryan Parker [ mailto:rparker@endicott.com ]

Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 2:53 PM

To: Nizich, Sharon

Subject: Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing MACT

- Endicott supplemental

information

Ms. Nizich,

I am following

- up on my letter of September 4, 2015, that addressed my concerns over the no visible emission requirement as proposed in the Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing MACT, Docket No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2013

- 0291. In furthering the details o f my letter I wanted to let you know that based on our recent stack test we comply with the PM limit as proposed for existing

sources. In addition, we have personnel that are trained and certified in Method 9 and our kiln stack test readings have been at or below 10%.

Regards, Ryan Parker

Ryan L. Parker | President & CEO P.O. Box 17 | Fairbury, NE 68352

PH: 402

- 729

- 3315 FAX: 402

- 729

- 5804

BRICK • THIN BRICK • PAVERS • TILE | endicott.com

This commun ication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and state law governing electronic communications and may contain confidential and legally privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notif ied that any dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please reply immediately to the sender and delete this message. Thank you.
1 

### MEMORANDUM

TO: Maj’d El-Zoobi, EPA/OPPT/CEB

FROM: Anjali Lamba, ERG

DATE: January 20, 2009

SUBJECT: Work Assignment 3-01; IH review of responses to P07-0601 test data

limitations.

The purpose of this memorandum is to review responses to the comments provided by ERG in its earlier review of the worker inhala tion monitoring test data submitted by . The monitoring was performed by at , the , and the from September 17 through September 19, 2008.

This review ascertains whether the respons es provided by the submitter adequately address the study limitations identified in the ERG review. Additional information included by the submitter on the analytical method chosen, the sampling duration, the nature of the assembly process, and the build ing and process systems alleviates some of the concerns noted previously by ERG. Since it has been clearly stated by the industrial hygiene program manager that the driver for selecting a specific number of employees for monitoring was internal experience as well ex ternal observations, the need to include a total number of workers by each job title is no longer an issue.

The only two areas from the previous ERG review which the submitter has failed to

address are listed below:

• The study does not provide information on whether there may be other tasks with potential for worker exposure; e.g., task s performed by workers involved in nonroutine activities . Note, these workers might not belong to the same job classifications as those associated with of the .

• If different employees work different shif ts, or an employee works different shifts on different days, then exposures shoul d be characterized for each shift.

It is recommended that the submitter provide cl arifications to indicate whether there is any potential for exposure of workers above the monitoring result values when engaged in non-routine activities or during th e type of shift work noted above.
# The Attorney General of Texas October 4, 1979 MARK WiiltE AttorneyQeneml

4sN rIben. An., suite lso El PW. TX. wsos 0ws13-34M Dr. Kenneth II. Ashwath

Coordinating Board Texas College and University System P. 0. Box12788,Capitol Station Austin, Texas 787ll Opinion No. MW-64 Re: Authority of governing board to change name of statutorily authorized institutions of higher education. Dear Dr. Ashwath: You inquire about the authority of governing boards and the Coordinating Board, Texas College and Unfverslty System, to rename statutorily authorized institutions ofhigher education. The names of the institutions about which you inquire are established by statute. Webelleve an administrative body lacks authority to chaige a statutorily established name. An administrative agency has only those powers expressly conferred by statute or .implIed therefrom. Stauffer v. City of San Antonio, 344 S.W.2d158(Tex. 198ll. It may not promulgate rules that conflict with general law. State v. Jackson, 378S.W.2d341(Tex. 1984); see also Brown Bxpreor, Inc. v. Railroad Commission, 415S.W.2d 394 (Tex. =82 ” IIY Industrial Accident Board, 358 S.W.2d874 (Tex. Civ. App.-

, writ ref%B. The legislature has amen&d the Education Code on numerous occasions to change the name of a state college or university.

Code S87.001(Tarleton State University); S87.101(Prairie See, e.g., Educ. View A&M Unlversityk S104.01(University System of South Texas); 9ll3.01 (Texas Eastern University). See also Attorney General Opinions WW-1035 (198B(name of the “Agricultural and Mechanical Collage of Texas” may be changed by act of the legislature and does not require constitutional amendment); WW-473(1958)(water control and improvement district may not change its name). ‘We find no provision expressly authorizing the Coordinating Board cr the Regents of the various colleges and universities to change the name of an institution under their jurisdiction. Accordingly, the statutorily established name of a state-supported college or university may not be changed in the absence ofauthority granted by the legislature. SUMMARY The Coordinating Board and the governing boards of state-supported colleges and universities may not

P. 199Dr. Kenneth II. Ashworth - Page TWO (Mw-641

change the legislatively established name of an institution under H their jurisdiction. 

# vwLrz

MARK WHITE Attorney General of Texas JOHNW.PAINTER,JR. First Assistant Attorney General TEDL. HARTLEY Executive Assistant Attorney General Prepared by Susan Garrison Assistant Attorney General % APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMITTEE C. Robert Heath, Chairman DavidB.Brooks Susan Garrison Rick Gilpin WilliamGReid Bruce Youngblood Lonny Zwiener

p. 20.0
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          23,356
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,356
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,701
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,170
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,356
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,950
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,950)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,950)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.003)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27439]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: NIAMS SEP Training Review (Teleconference).
    Date: December 12, 1997.
    Time: 10:00 a.m.-11:30 a.m.
    Place: Grants Review Branch, Natcher Building, Room 5AS25U, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20815.
    Contact Person: Aftab A. Ansari, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, RM 5AS25U, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-6500, Telephone: 301-594-4952.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review research grant 
applications.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. The 
discussion of these applications could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. [93.846, 
Project Grants in Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases 
Research], National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 9, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-27439 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
127 STAT. 554 PUBLIC LAW 113–43—OCT. 4, 2013 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1348: 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 113–109 (Comm. on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013): 

Sept. 26, considered and passed Senate. 

Sept. 30, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–43 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Award Program 

Reauthorization Act of 2013’’. 

SEC. 2. TERMINATION. 

Section 108 of the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 808) 

is amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘October 

1, 2018’’. 

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

This Act shall take effect as of October 1, 2013. 

Approved October 4, 2013. 

2 USC 808 note. 

Congressional 

Award Program 

Reauthorization 

Act of 2013. 

2 USC 801 note. 

Oct. 4, 2013 

[S. 1348] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS