alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21


                        SUBSIDIARIES OF NTL INCORPORATED

All of the corporations listed below were organized in the United Kingdom.

CableTel Cardiff Ltd.
CableTel Central Hertfordshire Limited
CableTel Glasgow
CableTel Hertfordshire Limited
CableTel Herts and Beds Limited
CableTel Investments Limited
CableTel Kirklees
CableTel Limited
CableTel Newport
CableTel North Bedfordshire Limited
CableTel Northern Ireland Limited
CableTel Scotland Ltd.
CableTel South Wales Ltd.
CableTel Surrey and Hampshire Limited
CableTel Telecom Supplies Limited
CableTel (UK) Limited
CableTel West Glamorgan Ltd.
CableTel West Riding Limited
Chamber Online Limited
Columbia Management Limited
Digital Television Network Limited
DTELS Limited
Enablis Limited
Metro Hertfordshire Limited
Metro South Wales Limited
National Transcommunications Limited
NTL Group Limited
NTL Insurance Limited
NTL Internet Limited
NTL Investment Holdings Limited
NTL Limited
NTL Networks Limited
NTL Trustees Limited
Prospectre Limited
Secure Backup Systems Limited
<PAGE>


All of the corporations listed below were incorporated in Delaware:

CableTel Programming, Inc.
CableTel Ventures Limited
Cellular Paging, Inc.
L.D. Data, Inc.
NTL International Services, Inc.
NTL (UK) Group, Inc.
OCOM Corporation
OCOM New York, Inc.
OCOM Pennsylvania, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         282,115
<SECURITIES>                                     1,401
<RECEIVABLES>                                  788,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,191,393
<PP&E>                                         621,558
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,166,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,477,347
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        20,943
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,166,937
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,223,873
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,797,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,750,650
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (192,961)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (192,961)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27079]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,624]


Fruit of the Loom, Sherman Warehouse Distribution Center, 
Sherman, MS; Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on July 7, 1997, in response to a worker petition which 
was filed on behalf of workers at Fruit of the Loom, Sherman Warehouse 
Distribution Center, located in Sherman, Mississippi.
    An active certification covering the petitioning group of workers 
is already in effect (TA-W-33,767E). Consequently, further 
investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC this 29th day of September, 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-27079 Filed 10-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RUBEN ISRAEL RIVERA, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 06-142 Erie

v. )

)

FRANKLIN J. TENNIS, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was received by the Clerk of

Court on June 28, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan

Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act,

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 2], filed on July

10, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Motion [Doc. No. 1] be denied. The parties

were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was

made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondent. No objections were filed. 

After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the

Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis [Doc. No. 1] is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 2] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on July 10, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:06-cv-00142-SJM-SPB Document 6 Filed 08/01/06 Page 1 of 1
*	CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY 
WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A 
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST.



January 8, 1997
Our Ref: B96-7701-RJTL-RJ0350-011

Atlantic Coast Airlines
1 Export Drive, 
Sterling, Virginia,
U.S.A. 20164


Gentlemen,

Letter Agreement No. 011 to Purchase Agreement No. RJ-0350 dated 
January 8, 1997 (the "Agreement" between Bombardier Inc. ("BRAD") 
and Atlantic Coast Airlines ("Buyer") relating to the purchase of 
twelve (12) Canadair Regional Jet Aircraft (the "Aircraft")


Subject:		Spares


1.0	This letter constitutes an integral part of the Agreement 
and evidences our further agreement with the matters set 
forth below.  All terms used herein and in the Agreement and 
not defined herein, shall have the same meaning as in the 
Agreement.

2.0	*


3.0	*














4.0	The provisions of this Letter Agreement are personal to 
Buyer and shall not be assigned or otherwise disposed of by 
Buyer except as part of an assignment of the Agreement (in 
whole but not in part) expressly permitted by Article 20 of 
the Agreement.

5.0	This Letter Agreement constitutes an integral part of the 
Agreement and subject to the terms and conditions contained 
therein.

6.0	In the event of the Termination of the Agreement, this 
Letter Agreement shall become automatically null and void.
	




Should there be any inconsistency between this Letter Agreement 
and the Agreement with respect to the subject matter covered by 
the terms hereof, then this Letter Agreement shall prevail.


Yours very truly,
BOMBARDIER INC.



________________________				Date:_____________
Michel Bourgeois
Vice President, Contracts 





Acknowledged and Accepted


Atlantic Coast Airlines



________________________				Date:_____________
James B. Glennon
Sr. Vice President and C.F.O.

 

 
[Footnote continued from previous page]

[Footnote continued on next page]

3
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003)
 
 I, Donald R. Katz, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of Audible, Inc. (the Registrant), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 of the Registrant (the Report):
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) [15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 
 /s/ Donald R. KatzName:
Donald R. KatzDate:
May 17, 2004
#### Willie Joe BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-786.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 14, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### John F. ADERHOLD, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. BLAIR CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. EE-355.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 6, 1977.

Samuel Z. Goldman of Hastings & Goldman, Miami, for appellants.

James C. Rinaman, Jr., and William S. Burns, Jr. of Marks, Gray, Conroy & Gibbs, and Robert M. Sharp of Bullock, Sharp & Childs, Jacksonville, for appellees.

*551PER CURIAM.

The record supports the trial court’s determination that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that appellant, when injured on the job, was an employee of the contractor who was engaged to perform the owner’s work. The subcontractor whose negligence allegedly caused appellant’s injury was immune from liability, as the trial court held in granting the motion for summary judgment. Sections 440.-10, .11, Florida Statutes (1971).

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50861 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOEL ELOY GOMEZ-PERALTA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-98-CR-405-All-H

- - - - - - - - - -

April 15, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Joel Eloy Gomez-Peralta (Gomez) appeals his conviction and

sentence for importation of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 952(a) and 960(a)(1), and possession with intent to distribute

cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Gomez contends

that the district court abused its discretion when it refused to

submit a proposed verdict form that would allow the jury to

consider a charge of importation and possession with intent to

distribute marijuana, rather than cocaine. See United States v. 
No. 98-50861

-2-

Townsend, 31 F.3d 262, 270 (5th Cir. 1994)(holding that

challenges to jury instructions are reviewed for abuse of

discretion); see also Solis v. Rio Grande City Indep. School, 734

F.2d 243, 249 (5th Cir. 1984)(holding that refusal to include a

requested special verdict is reviewed for abuse of discretion). 

Although Gomez knew he was smuggling a controlled substance,

he testified at trial that he did not know he was smuggling

cocaine. Rather, he thought he was smuggling marijuana. This

court has held that the government is not required to prove that

a defendant knew the exact nature of the substance with which he

was dealing; it is sufficient that he was aware that he possessed

some controlled substance. United States v. Gonzalez, 700 F.2d

196, 200 (5th Cir. 1983). The district court did not abuse its

discretion when refusing to submit Gomez’s requested verdict form

to the jury, because knowledge of the exact controlled substance

is not an element of the offense. Id. Consequently, Gomez’s

conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
## Docket No. FAA**- 2012**  **- 1321** 
**Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  7/1/11 **Regional Airline Association Co**  **nnie Arnold**  7/1/11

**Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  7/1/11 **ATA Joe White**  7/1/11
#### George William COATES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-507.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 12, 1971.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and W. Daniel Kearney, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Shaw, Fla.App. 1969, 219 So.2d 49.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3229 

To prohibit Federal agencies from restricting the use of convertible virtual 

currency by a person to purchase goods or services for the person’s 

own use, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 6, 2023 

Mr. BUDD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal agencies from restricting the use of 

convertible virtual currency by a person to purchase 

goods or services for the person’s own use, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON RESTRICTING USE OF CON4 VERTIBLE VIRTUAL CURRENCY BY A PERSON 

5 TO PURCHASE GOODS OR SERVICES FOR THE 

6 PERSON’S OWN USE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—No agency head may prohibit or 

8 otherwise restrict the ability of a covered user to— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3229 IS

1 (1) use virtual currency or its equivalent for 

2 such user’s own purposes, such as to purchase real 

3 or virtual goods and services for the user’s own use; 

4 or 

5 (2) conduct transactions through a self-hosted 

6 wallet. 

7 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

8 (1) CONVERTIBLE VIRTUAL CURRENCIES.—A 

9 medium of exchange that— 

10 (A) has an equivalent value as currency (as 

11 defined in section 1010.100 of title 31, Code of 

12 Federal Regulations (or successor regulations)); 

13 or 

14 (B) acts as a substitute for currency but 

15 may not possess all the attributes (including 

16 legal tender status) specified under such section 

17 1010.100. 

18 (2) COVERED USER.—The term ‘‘covered user’’ 

19 means a person that obtains convertible virtual cur20 rency to purchase goods or services on that person’s 

21 own behalf, without regard to the method in which 

22 such covered user obtained such convertible virtual 

23 currency. 

24 (3) SELF-HOSTED WALLET.—The term ‘‘self25 hosted wallet’’ means an interface— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3229 IS

1 (A) used to secure and transfer convertible 

2 virtual currency; and 

3 (B) under which the owner of convertible 

4 virtual currency retains independent control 

5 over such convertible virtual currency that is se6 cured by such digital interface. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BENJAMIN B. BUCKHANNAN, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-181 Erie

v. )

)

JAMES SHERMAN, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on June 10, 2005,

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 8], filed on

October 26, 2005, recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 3]

be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file

objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondent. No

objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case,

together with the Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following

order is entered:

AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2005;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 3]

is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 8] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on October 26, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00181-SJM-SPB Document 9 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 1
Hardesty Parraguirre J. order as certification of the district court's intention to grant reconsideration. We grant the motion and we

ORDER this matter REMANDED to the district court.'

cc: Hon. Jerome Polaha, District Judge Mary Lou Wilson Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

3 -This order constitutes our final disposition of this appeal. Any subsequent appeal shall be docketed as a new matter. 2
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND 
  RULE 13a-14(b)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sense Technologies Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and
on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and Rule 13a-14(b), that to his knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: July 20, 2005 | By: | /s/ Bruce Schreiner                       
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                     |     | Bruce E. Schreiner                        
|                     |     | President and Principal Accounting Officer

---
What Is the Exploratory 

Advanced Research Program?

FHWA’s Exploratory Advanced Research 

(EAR) Program focuses on long-term, highrisk research with a high payoff potential. 

The program addresses underlying gaps 

faced by applied highway research 

programs, anticipates emerging issues 

with national implications, and reflects 

broad transportation industry goals and 

objectives. 

To learn more about the EAR Program, 

visit the Exploratory Advanced Research 

Web site at www.fhwa.dot.gov/

advancedresearch. The site features 

information on research solicitations, 

updates on ongoing research, links to 

published materials, summaries of past 

EAR Program events, and details on 

upcoming events. For additional 

information, contact David Kuehn at FHWA, 

202-493-3414 (email: david.kuehn@dot.gov), 

or Terry Halkyard at FHWA, 202-493-3467 

(email: terry.halkyard@dot.gov).
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 188 (Monday, September 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25706]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amend (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Name of Committee: Environmental Health Sciences Review 
Committee.
    Date: November 20-21, 1997.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.
    Place: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 
South Campus, Building 101, Conference Room B, Research Triangle 
Park, North Carolina 27709.
    Contact Person: Dr. Ethel B. Jackson, Scientific Review 
Administrator, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-24, Research Triangle Park, NC 
27709, (919) 541-7826.
    Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.113, 
Biological Response to Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied 
Toxicological Research and Testing; 93.115, Biometry and Risk 
Estimation; 93.894, Research and Manpower Development, National 
Institutes of Health)

    Dated: September 23, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-25706 Filed 9-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1222

(Interference No. 105,602)

JONES J. ROBERTSON and ROBERT M. CURRIE,

Appellants,

v.

JOS TIMMERMANS and JEAN C. RAYMOND,

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office,

Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

ON MOTION

ORDER

David H. Voorhees moves for leave to withdraw as counsel.

The court notes that Voorhees did not enter an appearance in this case and thus

it is unnecessary for counsel to move for leave to withdraw. The court was serving

Voorhees with documents in the case until counsel entered an appearance. Other

attorneys have recently entered appearances on behalf of the appellants.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is denied as unnecessary.

FOR THE COURT

JUN -4 2009

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Date	

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc:	Christian J. Garascia, Esq.

Alton W. Payne, Esq.

David H. Voorhees, Esq.

s8 JUN 04 2009

JAN HORIJALY

CLERK
PUBLIC LAW 104–81—DEC. 28, 1995 109 STAT. 795

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 69:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):

Nov. 7, considered and passed House.

Dec. 20, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–81

104th Congress

Joint Resolution

Providing for the reappointment of Homer Alfred Neal as a citizen regent of the

Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance

with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States

(20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress,

occurring by reason of the expiration of the term of Homer Alfred

Neal of Michigan on December 6, 1995, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent for a term of six years, effective December

7, 1995.

Approved December 28, 1995.

Dec. 28, 1995

[H.J. Res. 69]