alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Description of performance bonus arrangement for executive officers for the 
calendar year ending December 31, 1999 ("1999"):

For the first half of calendar 1999, the Company's executive officers will be 
eligible for discretionary bonus compensation of up to 20% of base salary if 
positive net income is realized year-to-date through June 30, 1999. 

The bonus plan for the second half of 1999 is based on two components: 1)
Return on Capital and 2) Unit Growth.  Bonuses (if any) are to be calculated and
paid quarterly, based upon stand alone quarterly results.  Potential bonuses are
also to be calculated on full year amounts at year end, with such year end
calculation determined at four times the applicable quarterly rate, less any
interim payments.  No return of a prior bonus is required if the full year
calculation yields less than the sum of prior quarter payments.

Return on Capital ("ROC") is defined to equal, for the applicable time period 
calculated, the product of (a) income from operations before bonus accruals 
pursuant to this plan (either for the full year, or annualized by multiplying 
quarterly pre-bonus income from operations by four, as applicable), divided by 
(b) the sum of (i) average shareholders' equity and (ii) average funded debt. 
If ROC is 5% or greater, the ROC bonus shall be actual ROC for the applicable 
period times the employee's full year base salary.

Unit Growth is to equal actual unit volume for the applicable quarterly or 
full year period, less actual unit volume for the comparable prior year 
period, divided by actual unit volume for the comparable prior year period.
The Unit Growth component of the applicable employee's bonus shall be 
determined as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   If Unit                 the ROC Bonus is at least as follows,   
  Growth is      and           then Unit Growth Bonus % is:
--------------		------------------------------------------
                              5%          10%         15%
                             ----        -----       -----
<S>                          <C>         <C>         <C>
Zero or less                 (1.0)%      (2.0)%      (3.0)%
 0.01% to  9.99%               -           -           -
10.00% to 14.99%              2.5%        5.0%       10.0%
15.00% to 19.99%              5.0%       10.0%       15.0%
20.00% or more               10.0%       15.0%       20.0%


</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-2870

___________________________ Clayton Walker lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. Steve Barnett, Secretary of State, in his official capacity; Shantel Krebs, in her individual capacity; Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity; Jason Ravnsborg, in

his official capacity; Kea Warne, in her official capacity lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Southern

____________ Submitted: March 22, 2021 Filed: April 2, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before SHEPHERD, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Clayton Walker appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of

summary judgment in his civil action challenging the constitutionality of certain South Dakota election laws. Upon careful de novo review, see Odom v. Kaizer, 864 F.3d 920, 921 (8th Cir. 2017) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo); Libertarian Party of N.D. v. Jaeger, 659 F.3d 687, 692-93 (8th Cir. 2011) (dismissal for failure to state a claim is reviewed de novo), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Walker’s appellate motions.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota. -2-
GUARANTY

        For value received, Paradigm Group II, LLC (the "Obligor"), the undersigned (collectively, "Guarantor") hereby personally and severally guarantees (hereinafter the "Guaranty") to XML - GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (XML), subject to the terms and conditions of this Guaranty, prompt payment of the attached January 27, 2003 promissory note (hereinafter the "Note").


        Notwithstanding anything in this Guaranty to the contrary, Guarantor's maximum limit of liability hereunder (hereinafter the "Guaranty Balance") shall be reduced dollar for dollar for any and all payments made by Obligor to XML pursuant to the Note, and/or payments made by Guarantor to XML, and such that this Guaranty shall terminate when the cumulative total amounts paid by the Obligor to XML and or total amounts paid by the Guarantor to XML, as the case may be, equals or exceeds the Guaranty Balance to zero.


        EXECUTED this _____ day of January 29, 2003.


	
Corporate Paradigm Group II, LLC:
	 	 
	
By:______________________________

Sheldon Drobny, managing member
	
By:______________________________

Aaron Fischer, managing member
	 
	
_________________________________

Reevy Rosenberg, managing member
	 	 
	 	 	 
	
Personal Guarantys:
	 	 
	 	 	 
	
If, for any reason, Paradigm Group II, LLC does not or can not complete the payments due under this Guaranty, we the undersigned, jointly and severally, do personally guaranty said payments.

	
_________________________________

Sheldon Drobny
	
________________________________

Aaron Fischer
	 
	
______________________________

Reevy Rosenberg
	
________________________________

Randall S. Goulding
	 




Subscribed and sworn to before me

on this _____ day of January 27, 2003.



_________________________________

Notary Public
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   92,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,239
<INVENTORY>                                     67,444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,272
<PP&E>                                          20,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 198,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,258
<BONDS>                                         63,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   198,062
<SALES>                                        141,519
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,519
<CGS>                                          119,322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   320
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,436
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,318
<INCOME-TAX>                                       957
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,361
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,361
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21



</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

EARNEST BYRD , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2801

[February 15, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; David French , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2017

- CA

- 008603

- XXXXMB

- AJ

.
Earnest Byrd, Crestview, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ROSS , C IK LIN and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------



      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Timothy  R.  Kasmoch,  the  Chief  Executive Officer of N-Viro International
Corporation,  certify  that  (i)  the  Form  10-KSB  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and  (ii)  the  information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of N-Viro
International  Corporation.


/s/ Timothy  R.  Kasmoch
------------------------
Timothy  R.  Kasmoch,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer
April  2,  2007
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3044 

To redesignate the Mount Evans Wilderness as the ‘‘Mount Blue Sky 

Wilderness’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 16, 2023 

Mr. HICKENLOOPER (for himself and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Mount Evans Wilderness as the ‘‘Mount 

Blue Sky Wilderness’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mount Blue Sky Wil5 derness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF THE MOUNT EVANS WILDER7 NESS AS THE ‘‘MOUNT BLUE SKY WILDER8 NESS’’. 

9 (a) REDESIGNATION.—Section 102(a)(10) of Public 

10 Law 96–560 (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; 94 Stat. 3267) is 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3044 IS

1 amended by striking ‘‘as the Mount Evans Wilderness;’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘as the ‘Mount Blue Sky Wilderness’;’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the Mount Evans Wilderness shall be deemed 

6 to be a reference to the ‘‘Mount Blue Sky Wilderness’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2912 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2912

To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
  allow the Secretary of Agriculture to enter into self-determination 
  contracts with Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations to carry out 
              supplemental nutrition assistance programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2023

 Ms. Smith (for herself and Mr. Rounds) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act to 
  allow the Secretary of Agriculture to enter into self-determination 
  contracts with Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations to carry out 
              supplemental nutrition assistance programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SNAP Tribal Food Sovereignty Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. SELF-DETERMINATION FOR SNAP.

    Title I of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance 
Act (25 U.S.C. 5321 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:

``SEC. 112. SELF-DETERMINATION FOR SNAP.

    ``(a) Agriculture Self-Determination Authorized.--The Secretary of 
Agriculture shall enter into self-determination contracts, in 
accordance with subsection (b), with Indian Tribes and Tribal 
organizations, on the request of any Indian Tribe by Tribal resolution, 
to plan, conduct, and administer any function, service, or activity of 
the supplemental nutrition assistance program established under the 
Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) for the Indian 
Tribe.
    ``(b) Self-Determination Contract.--A self-determination contract 
entered into under subsection (a) shall have the same terms and 
conditions, and be subject to the same procedures, regulations, and 
requirements, as a self-determination contract entered into under 
section 102, except that the Secretary of Agriculture and the 
Department of Agriculture shall be the appropriate Secretary and agency 
for purposes of a self-determination contract entered into under 
subsection (a).
    ``(c) Technical Assistance.--The Office of Self-Governance of the 
Bureau of Indian Affairs shall provide technical assistance regarding 
the self-determination contracts authorized under this section to--
            ``(1) the Secretary of Agriculture; and
            ``(2) Indian Tribes and Tribal organizations that request 
        that assistance.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### CHAMPION DEVELOPERS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. FLORIDA FOREST PRODUCTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-171.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 28, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         700,432
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,361
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               744,350
<PP&E>                                         363,272
<DEPRECIATION>                                 168,171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,181,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          505,646
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,834,448
<COMMON>                                        26,362
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,635,571)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,181,019
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               424,701
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  412,380
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,321
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,321
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,321
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark Scott, Chief Operating and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with
the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law.

                                        /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        Chief Operating and Financial Officer
                                        August 19, 2008
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-31172

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DONALD JOSEPH BARNE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:06-CR-162-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Donald Joseph Barne

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Barne has not filed a response. The record

is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of any potential

claim of ineffective assistance of counsel identified by counsel; such a claim

generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [it] has not been raised

before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 15, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-31172

2

merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th

Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent

review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
**Exhibit 23.3**

**DEGOLYER  AND MACNAUGHTON**

5001 SPRING VALLEY  ROAD  SUITE 800 EAST  DALLAS, TEXAS 75244

May 14, 2012

YPF S.A.  Macacha Guemes 515  C1106BKK Buenos Aires  Argentina

Ladies and Gentlemen:

    We hereby consent to the references  to DeGolyer and MacNaughton and to the inclusion of our third-party letter report  dated February 17, 2012, as set forth under the sections “Item 4. Information  on the Company-Exploration and Production-Oil and Gas Reserves,” “Item  19. Exhibits,” and as Exhibit 99.2 in YPF S.A.’s report on Form 20-F  for the year ended December 31, 2011, to be filed with the United States Securities  and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the incorporation by reference of the same  information in Form F-3 documents that have been filed with the SEC by YPF S.A.

     Our third-party letter report  contains our independent estimates of the proved crude oil, condensate, natural  gas liquids, gasoline, marketable gas, and oil equivalent reserves as of September  30, 2011, of certain selected properties in the Golfo San Jorge and Neuquina  basins in Argentina in which YPF S.A. holds interests.

|   | Very truly yours,                       |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON            |
|   | DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON                |
|   | Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716 |
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 11-1122 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Cooperation 

 Protocol Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and KAZAKHSTAN 

Amending the Agreement of June 20, 2010 

Signed at Washington July 8, 2011 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
KAZAKHSTAN 

 Defense: Cooperation 

 Protocol amending agreement of June 20, 2010. 

 Signed at Washington July 8, 2011; 

 Entered into force November 22, 2011. 
Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Support for

Commercial Rail Transit of Special Cargo through the Territory of the

Republic of Kazakhstan in Connection with the Participation of the

United States of America in Efforts for the Stabilization and

Reconstruction of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan

The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the

Republic of Kazakhstan,

In accordance with paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 13 of the Agreement

Between the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Government of the

United States of America on Support for Commercial Rail Transit of Special Cargo

through the Territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan in Connection with the

Participation of the United States of America in Efforts for the Stabilization and

Reconstruction of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, signed on June 20, 2010, in

Astana (hereinafter, the Agreement),

Have agreed to amend the Agreement as follows:

Article 1

Paragraph 2 of Article 3 of the Agreement shall read as follows:

"2. The commercial rail transit of special cargo and escort personnel shall

take place through the following checkpoints:

a) from the Russian Federation/to the Russian Federation: Iletsk/Zhaysan;

b) from the Republic of Uzbekistan/to the Republic of Uzbekistan: SaryAgach/Keles and/or Beyneu/Karakalpakia."

Article 2

This Protocol shall enter into force in accordance with the procedure provided

for by Article 13 of the Agreement.

Done at Washington on July 8, 2011, in duplicate, in the Kazakh, English, and

Russian languages, all texts being equally authentic.

Ptv-vJ-d

For the Government of the

United States of America

For the Gov ment of the

Republic of azakhstan