alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
258 La. 350

#### James Rodney PHILLIPS v. Carol E. Bailey PHILLIPS.

No. 51282.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 14, 1971.

In re: Carol E. Bailey Phillips applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster. 244 So.2d 652.

Application denied; no error of law noted.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF SHILOH INDUSTRIES, INC.


         The following is a list of the subsidiaries of Shiloh Industries, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"). The common stock of all the
corporations listed below is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by the
Corporation. If indented, the corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of the
corporation under which it is listed unless otherwise noted.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF CORPORATION                                            STATE OF INCORPORATION
<S>                                                                     <C>
Shiloh Corporation                                                      Ohio
         The Sectional Die Company                                      Ohio
                   Sectional Stamping, Inc.                             Ohio
Valley City Steel Company (1)                                           Ohio
         Medina Blanking, Inc. (2)                                      Ohio
         Liverpool Coil Processing, Incorporated                        Ohio
Greenfield Die & Manufacturing Corporation                              Ohio
C&H Design Company                                                      Michigan
Jefferson Blanking, Inc.                                                Georgia
</TABLE>

The Corporation also owns an 80% equity interest in Shiloh of Michigan, L.L.C.,
a Michigan limited liability company. The Corporation owns an 19.75% equity
interest in Bing Banking L.L.C., a Michigan limited liability company.

----------

(1)      Valley City Steel Company is 49% owned by the Corporation and 51% owned
         by Shiloh Corporation.

(2)      Medina Blanking, Inc. is 22% owned by the Corporation, 22% owned by
         Shiloh Corporation and 56% owned by Valley City Steel Company.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Key Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted
R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

/s/  Ted R. Sharp
-----------------
Ted R. Sharp
Chief Financial Officer
December 19, 2002
#### Kenneth Harlan RICHARDSON v. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 39056.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Petitions for writ of injunction denied without opinion.
No. 00-7091.

#### Clark *v.*Stinson, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 1 CARLOS J. SANTOS, 1 II Plaintiff, 

11 JAMES F. SHERMAN, et al., 

Civil Action No. 05-31 3 Erie 

I I Defendants. 

MEMORANDUMORDER 

11 This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on October 21, 2005, 

11 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report 11 and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(I), 11 and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's oral Report and Recommendation, entered on the record 

on January 6, 2006 [Doc. No. 141, recommended that Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary 

lnjunction [Doc. No. 121 be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the 

11 date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on 11 Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the motion and 11 documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following 

11 order is entered: 

I1 AND NOW, this 25Ih day of January, 2006; 

II IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary lnjunction [Doc. 

11 No. 121 is DENIED. 

11 The oral Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, entered on 

11 the record on January 6, 2006 [Doc. No. 141, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. 

sl Sean J. McLaughlin United States District Judge 

cm: All parties of record 

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:05-cv-00313-SJM-SPB Document 15 Filed 01/25/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27660]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. CP96-311-000 and CP96-311-001]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Meeting

October 14, 1997.
    Take notice that there will be a meeting on October 22, 1997, at 
10:00 a.m. in Room 71-56, between representatives of Williams Natural 
Gas Company (Williams) and the Commission staff. The purpose of the 
meeting is to review the technical details of Williams' reservoir 
engineering study and new operational plan for Williams' Elk City 
Storage Field, both of which Williams must file with the Commission by 
November 30, 1997.
    In order that we may assess whether the seating at the designated 
location will be adequate, those planning to attend should notify Mr. 
Marc Poole, at (200) 208-0482, of the number of representatives that 
you expect to send to the meeting.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27660 Filed 10-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52794-52795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26820]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Reclearance of an 
Information Collection: Form RI 30-1

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management intends to submit to the Office of Management and 
Budget a request for reclearance of an information collection. RI 30-1, 
Request to Disability Annuitant for Information on Physical Condition 
and Employment, is used by retirees who are not age 60 and who are 
receiving disability annuity. These retirees must provide information 
about their medical condition as OPM deems necessary to continue their 
benefit. RI 30-1 requests

[[Page 52795]]

information about changes in the work disabling condition.
    Approximately 8000 RI 30-1 forms will be completed annually. We 
estimate it takes approximately 60 minutes to complete the form. The 
annual burden is 8000 hours.
    Comments are particularly invited on:

--Whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of functions of the Office of Personnel Management, and 
whether it will have practical utility;
--Whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection is 
accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; and
--Ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on those who are to respond, through use of the appropriate 
technological collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Jim Farron on (202) 418-3208, 
or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fa90979c9b88889594ba958a97d49d958c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c5afa8a3a4b7b7aaab85aab5a8eba2aab3">[email protected]</span></a>

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before 
December 8, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to-- Lorraine E. Dettman, Chief, 
Operations Support Division, Retirement and Insurance Service, U.S. 
Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW, Room 3349, 
Washington, DC 20415.

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION--CONTACT: Mary 
Beth Smith-Toomey, Management Services Division, (202) 606-0623.

Office of Personnel Management.
Janice R. Lachance,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 97-26820 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     I, Scott Thornock, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Nicklebys.com,
Inc.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
     controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
     date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          (c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
     internal controls that could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
     record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
     for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
     and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls.

     6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  October 23, 2003

                                   /s/ Scott Thornock
                                   -------------------
                                   Scott Thornock, President and Treasurer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 


FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 


PURCELL BRONSON, ) 

Plaintiff ) 

) 

vs. ) Civil Action No. 08-52E 

) Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge Amy Reynolds Hay 

MAXINE OVERTON; DOCTOR ) 

BAKER; RAYMOND SOBINA; CINDY ) 

WATSON, ) 

Defendants ) 

~ER 

AND NOW, this~ day of June, 2010, after the Plaintiff, Purcell Bronson, 

filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis was 

filed by Plaintiff, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States 

Magistrate Judge granting the parties until June 14,2010, to file written objections thereto, and 

Plaintiff having filed a Motion for Case Management Conference instead of objections to the 

Report and Recommendation, and upon independent review of the record, and upon 

consideration ofthe Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the 

opinion of this Court, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order granting Plaintiff's application for leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis is V ACA TED; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is given until July 17,2010, in which 

to pay the filing fee and ifhe fails to do so, the Court will enter an order dismissing the action for 

failure to prosecute. 

Case 1:08-cv-00052-ANB-ARH Document 94 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Case Management 

Conference [90] is DENIED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(l) ofthe Federal Rules of 

Appellate Procedure, if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order he must do so within thirty 

(30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed. R. App. P. 

ALAN N. BLOCH 

United States District Judge 

cc: 	 Honorable Amy Reynolds Hay 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Purcell Bronson 


AF-8163 


SCI Houtzdale 


Box 1000 


Houtzdale, P A 16698-1000 


All Counsel of Record by electronic filing 

Case 1:08-cv-00052-ANB-ARH Document 94 Filed 06/17/10 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as

adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of SRA International, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Ernst Volgenau, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Dated: September 29, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/
ERNST VOLGENAU                             
|------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                          |  |  |  | Ernst Volgenau                                 
|                          |  |  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

DAVID ADDISON GRANT MURRAY,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2939 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 3 DB 2023

Attorney Registration No. 330036

(Chester County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2023, upon consideration of the

Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint Petition 

in Support of Discipline on Consent is granted, and David Addison Grant Murray is 

suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year, retroactive to 

February 7, 2023. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and pay 

costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
Case 1:07-cr-00022-SJM Document 21 Filed 06/25/07 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cr-00022-SJM Document 21 Filed 06/25/07 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cr-00022-SJM Document 21 Filed 06/25/07 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cr-00022-SJM Document 21 Filed 06/25/07 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cr-00022-SJM Document 21 Filed 06/25/07 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cr-00022-SJM Document 21 Filed 06/25/07 Page 6 of 6
EXHIBIT 10.8

         AMENDMENT dated May 21st, 2003 to EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated February
3, 2003 (the "Employment Agreement") by and between IA GLOBAL, INC., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company") and SATORU HIRAI ("Executive").

                                   -----------


         The Company and the Executive have heretofore entered into the
Employment Agreement which, among other matters, provides that the Executive
shall receive Base Compensation (as therein defined) from the Company at an
annual rate of $91,200.

         The Company and the Executive wish to amend the Employment Agreement to
provide for the payment of a higher level of Base Compensation.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

         1. From and after the date hereof with retroactive effect to March,
2003, the Executive's Base Compensation shall be at an annual rate of $120,000.
Executive shall receive a balance of $9,600 at end of May, 2003.

         2. All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall
remain unmodified and in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to
the Employment Agreement as of the date set forth above.

                                    IA GLOBAL, INC.


                                    By: /s/ Alan Margerison
                                        -------------------
                                    Name:  Alan Margerison
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer



                                    /s/ Satoru Hirai
                                    ----------------
                                    Satoru Hirai
II 

Calendar No. 531 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3181 

To designate the Air and Marine Operations Marine Unit of the U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection located at 101 Km 18.5 in Cabo Rojo, Puerto 

Rico, as the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Marine Unit’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2023 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, and Mr. PADILLA) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the Air and Marine Operations Marine Unit 

of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection located at 

101 Km 18.5 in Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Michel 

O. Maceda Marine Unit’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Me5 morial Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3181 RS

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

2 Congress makes the following findings: 

3 (1) Marine Interdiction Agent Michel O. 

4 Maceda served honorably in the United States Army 

5 as a wheeled vehicle mechanic prior to joining the 

6 United States Border Patrol as an Agent in Doug7 las, Arizona, in April 2016. 

8 (2) In 2021, Agent Maceda became a Marine 

9 Interdiction Agent with U.S. Customs and Border 

10 Protection, Air and Marine Operations in Mayagu ̈ez, 

11 Puerto Rico. 

12 (3) On November 17, 2022, Agent Maceda and 

13 2 other agents were conducting a drug interdiction 

14 stop off the coast of Puerto Rico, during which the 

15 agents boarded the target vessel. 

16 (4) During the stop, Agent Maceda was mor17 tally wounded when 1 of the occupants of the vessel 

18 shot the boarding agents with a firearm. 

19 (5) Agent Maceda is survived by his daughter, 

20 brother, and parents. 

21 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION. 

22 The Air and Marine Operations Marine Unit of the 

23 U.S. Customs and Border Protection located at 101 Km 

24 18.5 in Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico, shall forever be known 

25 and designated as the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Marine Unit’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3181 RS

1 SEC. 4. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the marine 

4 unit referred to in section 3 shall be deemed to be a ref5 erence to the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Marine Unit’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 531 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3181 

A BILL 

To designate the Air and Marine Operations MaUnit’’, and for other purposes. Puerto Rico, as the ‘‘Michel O. Maceda Marine tection located at 101 Km 18.5 in Cabo Rojo, rine Unit of the U.S. Customs and Border ProSEPTEMBER 25, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DANIEL VEROSKO, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 10-25 Erie

v. )

)

MICHAEL NOLAN, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This action was received by the Clerk of Court on February 2, 2010, and was

referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and

recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and

Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 6], filed on May

10, 2010, recommended that the action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff

was allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections and service was

made on Plaintiff by certified mail. No objections were filed. After de novo review of

the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the

following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 1 day of June, 2010; st

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 6] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on May 10, 2010, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The clerk is directed to mark

the case closed. 

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00025-SJM-SPB Document 7 Filed 06/01/10 Page 1 of 1