alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND )

DENNIS P. ZMUDZIN, REVENUE )

OFFICER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE )

SERVICE, )

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-69E

v. ) JUDGE MCLAUGLIN

) ELECTRONICALLY FILED 

DAVID J. MOLLER, )

Respondent. )

ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2006, upon consideration of the testimony and

documentary evidence produced by the United States of America at the Show Cause hearing held

on July 13, 2006, the Court finds as follows:

1. The United States of America first served a summons for documents concerning

the assets and liabilities of David J. Moller on June 6, 2005.

2. The United States subsequently filed a Complaint in this Court to Enforce the

Internal Revenue Summons ("IRS") issued to Mr. Moller regarding an investigation by Revenue

Officer Dennis P. Zmudzin into the collectibility of the income tax liability of Mr. Moller for the

tax years ending December 31, 1998 and December 31, 1999.

3. The Show Cause Hearing was conducted on Thursday, July 13, 2006 at 1:30 p.m.. 

Respondent failed to appear.

4. As set forth more fully on the record at the hearing, the Court finds:

a. That the United States has met its burden in the issuance of the

summons, and that the IRS is conducting an investigation for a legitimate

purpose;

Case 1:06-cv-00069-SJM Document 13 Filed 07/19/06 Page 1 of 2
b. That the summoned documents may be relevant to the purpose of the

investigation; 

c. That the documents and information contained therein is not in the

possession of the IRS;

d. That the IRS properly followed all administrative steps required under

the laws of the United States of America, and;

e. That enforcement of the summons is not an abuse of this Court's

powers. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that David J. Moller appear

at the offices of the Internal Revenue Service, 228 Walnut Street, Room 620, P.O. Box 866,

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17108 (Telephone Number: 717-221-3490, Extension 131) on

Monday, August 21, 2006, at 9:00 a.m., and bring any and all documents as detailed in the June

6, 2005 summons of Revenue Officer Dennis P. Zmudzin. 

 

SEAN J. MCLAUGHLIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: All parties of record

 David J. Moller, Certified Mail

 RR 2 Box 2785

 Russell, PA 16345-9304

 

Case 1:06-cv-00069-SJM Document 13 Filed 07/19/06 Page 2 of 2
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.48 N 77.37 W Meters AGL
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 97-530 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SPACE COOPERATION 

Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and JAPAN 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington May 30, 1997 

and 

Memorandum of Understanding 

Signed at Washington October 20, 1995 

with 

Agreement amending Memorandum of Understanding 

Signed at Tokyo June 2, 1997 

and 

Agreement Extending the Agreement of May 30, 1997 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington May 28, 2002 

 and 

Agreement Extending the Agreement of May 30, 1997 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington May 22, 2008 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 JAPAN 

Space Cooperation: Tropical Rainfall 

 Measuring Mission 

Agreement effected by exchange of notes at Washington 

 May 30, 1997; 

Entered into force May 30, 1997. 

And memorandum of understanding signed at 

 Washington October 20, 1995; 

Entered into force October 20, 1995. 

With agreement amending the memorandum of 

 understanding. 

Signed at Tokyo June 2, 1997; 

Entered into force June 2, 1997. 

And agreement extending the agreement of 

 May 30, 1997. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Washington 

 May 28, 2002; 

Entered into force May 28, 2002. 

And agreement extending the agreement of 

 May 30, 1997. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Washington 

 May 22, 2008; 

Entered into force May 22, 2008.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

JOHN COTTILLION and BEVERLY ) 

ELDRIDGE, on behalf of themselves ) 

and all others similarly situated, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

-v- ) Case No. 1:09-cv-00140-SJM 

 ) 

UNITED REFINING COMPANY, ) 

UNITED REFINING COMPANY ) 

PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED ) 

EMPLOYEES, UNITED REFINING ) 

COMPANY RETIREMENT ) 

COMMITTEE, and JOHN AND MARY ) 

DOES 1 to 10, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

Having carefully considered Defendants’ motion for leave to file documents under seal 

(Doc. 65), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

Defendants’ motion for leave to file the following documents under seal in connection 

with Defendants’ Reply Brief in Support of Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Protective Order 

(“Defendant’s Brief”) is GRANTED: 

 (a) URC 001331-1336 CONFIDENTIAL, designated in Defendants’ Brief as 

 Exhibit P; and 

 (b) The chart entitled “Corrections of Plaintiffs Representations,” designated 

 in Defendants’ Brief as Exhibit G 

for the following reasons: 

1. The Court entered the Stipulated Protective Order (Doc. 41) in this action on 

October 8, 2010, and the Addendum on January 27, 2011 (Doc. 43), which allow for certain 

Case 1:09-cv-00140-SJM Document 66 Filed 04/18/11 Page 1 of 2 Case 1:09-cv-00140-CB Document 67 Filed 04/18/11 Page 1 of 2
 2 

documents, information and things involved in this litigation to be designated and kept 

confidential in order to protect the sensitive or proprietary business, commercial, or personal 

information of the parties and certain third parties. 

2. The Stipulated Protective Order and Addendum have been entered in accordance 

with the discretion afforded to the Court under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26. 

3. In accordance with the Stipulated Protective Order and the Addendum, 

Defendants and third parties have produced certain documents that they have designated as 

“Confidential Material.” 

4. In connection with Defendants’ Brief, Defendants intend to rely upon certain 

documents that have been designated as Confidential Material, pursuant to the Stipulated 

Protective Order and Addendum, and upon documents that contain references to Confidential 

Material. 

5. Accordingly, good cause exists to permit the aforementioned documents to be 

filed under seal. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: ________________, 2011 ____________________________________ 

 SEAN J. McLAUGHLIN 

 United States District Judge 

Case 1:09-cv-00140-SJM Document 66 Filed 04/18/11 Page 2 of 2 Case 1:09-cv-00140-CB Document 67 Filed 04/18/11 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3057 

To prohibit allocations of Special Drawing Rights at the International Monetary Fund for perpetrators of genocide and state sponsors of terrorism 

without congressional authorization. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2023 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. HAGERTY, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. 

GRASSLEY, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, and Mr. BARRASSO) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To prohibit allocations of Special Drawing Rights at the 

International Monetary Fund for perpetrators of genocide and state sponsors of terrorism without congressional authorization. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Dollars for Dic5 tators Act of 2023’’. 

2 

•S 3057 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ALLOCATIONS OF SPECIAL DRAW2 ING RIGHTS AT INTERNATIONAL MONETARY 

3 FUND FOR PERPETRATORS OF GENOCIDE 

4 AND STATE SPONSORS OF TERRORISM WITH5 OUT CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORIZATION. 

6 Section 6 of the Special Drawing Rights Act (22 

7 U.S.C. 286q) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(c) Unless Congress by law authorizes such action, 

10 neither the President nor any person or agency shall on 

11 behalf of the United States vote to allocate Special Draw12 ing Rights under article XVIII, sections 2 and 3, of the 

13 Articles of Agreement of the Fund to a member country 

14 of the Fund, if the government of the member country 

15 has— 

16 ‘‘(1) committed genocide at any time during the 

17 10-year period ending with the date of the vote; or 

18 ‘‘(2) been determined by the Secretary of State, 

19 as of the date of the enactment of the No Dollars 

20 for Dictators Act of 2023, to have repeatedly pro21 vided support for acts of international terrorism, for 

22 purposes of— 

23 ‘‘(A) section 1754(c)(1)(A)(i) of the Ex24 port Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 

25 4813(c)(1)(A)(i)); 

3 

•S 3057 IS

1 ‘‘(B) section 620A of the Foreign Assist2 ance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371); 

3 ‘‘(C) section 40(d) of the Arms Export 

4 Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780(d)); or 

5 ‘‘(D) any other provision of law.’’. 

Æ
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Patrick Joseph HAGGERTY, Relator, v. Louis L. WAINWRIGHT, Director Florida Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 69-1059.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 18, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas Corpus denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Shiloh Industries, Inc. (the Company) on form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: December 20, 2007



/S/    THEODORE K.
ZAMPETISTheodore K. Zampetis President and Chief Executive Officer/S/    STEPHEN E. GRAHAMStephen E. Graham Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### In the Matter of Claude J. FULLER, Bankrupt. Claude J. FULLER v. NEW YORK LIFE.

No. 7625.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 9, 1937.

O. L. McMahan, of Morristown, Tenn., for appellant.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Comes the appellant, Claude J. Fuller, and moves the court that he be permitted to dismiss his appeal, which motion, being well understood, is by the court allowed.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, and the case is remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Northeastern Division of the Eastern District of Tennessee, for ascertainment of damages, if any, in favor of New York Life Insurance Company and for further proceedings necessary and proper to a final dismissal of the petition.
### Magnitude and frequency of floods in the United States; part 1-B. North Atlantic slope basins, New York to York River

By: Richard H. Tice

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1672

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Flood magnitude-frequency relation applicable to streams in the North Atlantic slope basins, New York to York River, Va., are presented in this report.  The relations are based on flood data collected at 487 gaging stations having 5 or more years of record not materially affected by regulation. For sites on most streams, the magnitude of a flood of any given frequency between 1.1 and 50 years can be determined from two curves - one expressing the relation between the mean annual flood and size of draining basin and the other expressing the ratio to the mean annual flood of floods of other recurrence intervals. For New Jersey streams, an adjustment to the mean annual flood is based on the percentage of surface area covered by lakes and swamps in the basin.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**INSWEB CORPORATION**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I,William D. Griffin, Chief Financial Officer of InsWeb Corporation, certifythat:

 

(1)           Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of InsWeb Corporation;

 

(2)           Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

(3)           Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

(4)           Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

 

a.     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b.     Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c.     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

(5)           Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

a.     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b.     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| ** **              | **/s/  WILLIAM D. GRIFFIN** | ** ** |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------|------------|
| Dated:  August 11, 2005 | **William D. Griffin**      |
|                    | Chief  Financial Officer    |

 

1

----
#### Charles GRIMMETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-256.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 23, 1970.

Charles Grimmett, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY, and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defend*5ant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53013-53014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26883]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Office of Research on Women's Health; Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the meeting of 
the Advisory Committee on Research on Women's Health (ACRWH) to be held 
November 17, 1997 at the Bethesda Marriott (formerly Pooks Hill 
Marriott), Bethesda, Maryland 20892. The entire meeting will be open to 
the public from 8:30 a.m. to adjournment at 12:00 p.m. The purpose of 
the meeting will be for the Committee to provide advice to the Office 
of Research on Women's Health (ORWH) on its research agenda and to 
provide recommendations regarding ORWH activities. Attendance by the 
public will be limited to space available.
    The agenda will include an update on ORWH activities and programs 
to meet

[[Page 53014]]

the mandates of the office, and a report from the Special Ad Hoc 
Working Group on the Women's Health Initiative. The Committee will also 
discuss ongoing activities to update the NIH research agenda on women's 
health, including the national meeting, ``Beyond Hunt Valley: Research 
on Women's Health for the 21st Century.'' The national meeting is the 
culmination of a series of public hearings and scientific workshops 
held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, New Orleans, Louisiana, and Santa 
Fe, New Mexico, and will be conducted November 17-19, 1997 at the 
Bethesda Marriott.
    Joyce Rudick, Acting Executive Secretary, ACRWH, and Acting Deputy 
Director, ORWH, Office of the Director, NIH, Building 1, Room 201, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892, 301/402-1770, 301/402-1798 (Fax), will 
furnish the meeting agenda, roster of Committee members, and 
substantive program information upon request.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact Ms. Rudick in advance of the meeting.

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
LeVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-26883 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LARRY SMITH, :

:

Plaintiff : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-04-2267

:

v. : (Judge Jones)

:

DUANE BLACK, Warden, :

:

Defendant :

Order

September 1, 2005

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

The plaintiff Larry Smith (“Plaintiff” or “Smith”), an inmate presently confined

in the Luzerne County Correctional Facility, in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, filed this

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He seeks damages and injunctive

relief for an alleged violation of his First Amendment right to exercise his religion. 

On August 2, 2005, the defendant, Duane Black (“Defendant” or “Black”), filed a

Motion for Summary Judgment, along with a statement of material facts and

supporting brief. (Rec. Docs. 14-16). Plaintiff's brief in opposition to this motion is

now long overdue and Plaintiff has neither made an appropriate filing nor requested

Case 4:04-cv-02267-JEJ-DB Document 17 Filed 09/01/05 Page 1 of 3
1. By Order dated October 18, 2004, this Court directed the parties' attention to the Local Rules of

Court. (See Rec. Doc. 5). The Order referred specifically to an opposing party's duty to file a brief in

opposition to a motion within fifteen (15) days after service of the movant's brief. (See M.D. Pa. Local

Rule 7.6).

an extension of time in which to do so. Thus, we will direct Plaintiff to file a brief in

opposition.1 M.D. Pa. Local Rule 7.6.

Generally, a dispositive motion may not be granted merely because it is

unopposed; however, when a Plaintiff fails to prosecute or comply with a court order,

the court may dismiss the action pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. We will consider dismissing this case for failure to prosecute and comply

with a court order under the authority of Rule 41(b) if Plaintiff fails to file a brief in

opposition to the Motion or otherwise communicate with the Court within twenty (20)

days of the date of this Order.

Case 4:04-cv-02267-JEJ-DB Document 17 Filed 09/01/05 Page 2 of 3
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff shall file a brief in opposition to Defendant's Motion or

otherwise communicate with the Court within twenty (20) days of

the date of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file a brief in opposition,

we will consider dismissing Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Rule

41(b) for failure to prosecute and comply with a court order.

s/ John E. Jones III 

JOHN E. JONES III

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-02267-JEJ-DB Document 17 Filed 09/01/05 Page 3 of 3