alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3091 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3091

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit certain 
  clinics to qualify as a rural emergency hospital under the Medicare 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 19, 2023

 Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Sullivan) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit certain 
  clinics to qualify as a rural emergency hospital under the Medicare 
                                program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Inclusion Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING CERTAIN CLINICS TO QUALIFY AS A MEDICARE RURAL 
              EMERGENCY HOSPITAL.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(kkk) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(kkk)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; or''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraph:
                    ``(C) was a Federally qualified health center (as 
                defined in subsection (aa)(4)) that formerly 
                participated in the frontier extended stay clinic 
                demonstration under section 434 of the Medicare 
                Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act 
                of 2003.''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (4)(B)(i), by inserting ``or, in the 
        case of a facility described in paragraph (3)(C), as a 
        Federally qualified health center,'' after ``1886(d)(1)(B)),''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BENJAMIN J. WHERRY, )

Plaintiff, )

)

vs ) C.A. No. 06-100 Erie

)

WARDEN SHERMAN, et al., )

Defendants. )

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2006, after Plaintiff Rasheen Newkirk presented a

civil rights complaint which he seeks leave to prosecute in forma pauperis [Document # 14], and

it appearing that he has an average monthly balance of $ 875.33 in his account at FCI-McKean,

which sum is far in excess of the $ 350.00 filing fee required to commence this action, and it

further appearing that requiring said Plaintiff to pay the filing fee will not deprive him of any

necessities of life at the Institution, 

It is recommended that Plaintiff Newkirk's motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis [Document # 14] be denied.

Plaintiff Newkirk shall have ten (10) days from the date of service to file written

objections to this Report and Recommendation. Failure to file timely objections may constitute a

waiver of any appellate rights.

 S/Susan Paradise Baxter 

 SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge

cc: Rasheen Newkirk # 11341-055

 FCI-McKean

 P.O. Box 8000 

 Bradford, PA 16701

Case 1:06-cv-00100-SJM-SPB Document 15 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Fisheries Certificate of Origin.
    Agency Form Number: NOAA Form 370.
    OMB Approval Number: New number being requested but formerly under 
0648-0040.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement of a collection but with a request 
to assign a new OMB Control Number.
    Burden: 1,033 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 350 respondents with a total 4,000 
responses.
    Avg Hours Per Response: 20 minutes for processors and importers/
exporters and 5 minutes for vessel captains.
    Needs and Uses: The purpose of the collection of information is to 
comply with the requirements of the Marine Mammal Protection Act. The 
Act requires the Secretary of Commerce to promulgate regulations 
restricting the importation of tuna from those nations without a marine 
mammal protection program comparable to that of the United States. In 
addition, tuna that is not dolphin-safe cannot be transported or sold 
in the United States. The collection serves three purposes: (1) 
documents that the shipment is dolphin safe, (2) verifies that the fish 
was not harvested by large-scale high seas driftnets, and (3) verifies 
that tuna was not harvested by a nation under primary or secondary 
embargo.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to 
David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office 
Building, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: September 19, 1997.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 97-25440 Filed 9-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### Clayton ADAMS, Appellant, v. J. G. WHITFIELD et al., Appellees.

No. S-51.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 10, 1973.

Wilmer H. Mitchell, of Holsberry, Emmanuel, Sheppard, Mitchell & Condon, Pensacola, for appellant.

Robert P. Gaines, of Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis, Pensacola, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-plaintiff brings this appeal from that portion of a post trial order and final judgment setting aside a jury verdict awarding him punitive damages in the amount of $7,500.00 in a malicious prosecution action. Appellees-defendants cross-appealed the final judgment in favor of *9appellant for compensatory damages in the amount of $12,000.00.

After reviewing the record and transcript of the trial, it is the opinion of this Court that the trial judge was correct in setting aside punitive damages as awarded by the jury. However, we hold that the jury verdict as to compensatory damages is appropriate.

The judgment appealed is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and SPECTOR and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kenneth LORD.

No. 61520.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 3, 1978.

In re: Kenneth Lord, applying for writs of certiorari.

Granted, the order of the district judge on sequestration of jurors is reversed and the jury is ordered sequestered.

SANDERS, C. J. dissents.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GREGORY BROWN 

Plaintiff,

v.

WARREN STATE HOSPITAL, 

 Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civ. A. No. 05-274

District Judge McLaughlin 

Magistrate Judge Baxter

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I. RECOMMENDATION

It is respectfully recommended that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

[Document # 1] be denied and the case dismissed without prejudice.

II. REPORT

When submitting a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, the Plaintiff is required to submit

“an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such prisoner possesses that the person is unable

to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). In addition to the aforementioned affidavit, Plaintiff is further required to “submit a certified copy of the trust fund account

statement (or institutional equivalent) forthe prisonerforthe 6-monthperiod immediately preceding

the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison

at which the prisoner is or was confined.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).

In this case, Plaintiff has failed to submit a copy of his institutional account statement,

certified or otherwise. Because Plaintiff has failed to comply with the statutory prerequisites for

proceeding In Forma Pauperis, Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis should be denied

and the case dismissed without prejudice.

III. CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth above, it is respectfully recommended that the Plaintiff’s Motion

Case 1:05-cv-00274-SJM-SPB Document 2 Filed 09/27/05 Page 1 of 2
2

to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Document # 1] be denied and the case dismissed without prejudice.

In accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule

72.1.4(B) of the Local Rules for Magistrates, the parties are allowed ten (10) days from the date of

service to file objections to this report and recommendation. Any party opposing the objections

shall have seven (7) days from the date of service of objections to respond thereto. Failure to file

timely objections may constitute a waiver of any appellate rights.

S/Susan Paradise Baxter 

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge

Dated: September 27, 2005

cc: The Honorable Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00274-SJM-SPB Document 2 Filed 09/27/05 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
            32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification
  
 Pursuant
            to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
            Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of The Bralorne Mining
            Company (the “Company”) certifies that:
  1. The
            Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended March
            31,
            2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
            and
  2. The
            information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects,
            the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
                    May 21, 2007
                /s/
                    Zheng
                    ShuyingZheng
                    Shuying, Chief Executive Officer
                  and
                    Chief Financial Officer
                   
 *     
        *      *     
*      *
<PAGE>
						    Exhibit 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



To the Board of Directors
Micros-to-Mainframes, Inc.


We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (No. 333-72269) on Form S-8 of Micros-to-Mainframes, Inc. of
our report dated May 18, 2000 related to the consolidated balance sheets
of Micros-to-Mainframes, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000 and
1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders'
equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in
the March 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Micros-to-Mainframes,
Inc.




GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP
New York, New York

June 28, 2000




<PAGE>




Consent from Ernst & Young LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-72269) pertaining to the 1996 and 1998 Stock Option Plans
of Micros-To-Mainframes, Inc., of our report dated May 29, 1998, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Micros-To-Mainframes, Inc. for
the year ended March 31, 1998, included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended March 31, 2000, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.



					       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Stamford, Connecticut
June 28, 2000
form-sb2_021113



                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                             NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

     This Amendment No. 1 to the Note Purchase  Agreement dated February 4, 2003
shall serve to amend the Note Purchase Agreement and the convertible note issued
thereunder (the "Note"), dated as of March 31, 2000 (collectively referred to as
the  "Financing  Documents"),  by and  among  iDial  Networks,  Inc.,  a  Nevada
corporation (the "Company") and Mark T. Wood (the "Holder").

     The undersigned  parties hereby amend the Financing  Documents  whereby the
Company and the Holder agree that:

1.   The  Holder  agrees to defer all  payments  from the  Company  as set forth
     pursuant to the  Financing  Documents  until the earlier of (i) February 6,
     2004 or (ii)  AJW  Partners,  LLC,  AJW  Offshore,  Ltd.  or AJW  Qualified
     Partners, LLC no longer hold secured convertible debentures of the Company;
     provided,  however,  the Holder will be entitled to receive  payments under
     the Note in the event that the Company  has  generated  net  income,  which
     payments shall not exceed the amount of such net income.

2.   The Holder agrees to defer  conversion of the Note as set forth pursuant to
     the Financing  Documents until six (6) months after AJW Partners,  LLC, AJW
     Offshore,  Ltd.  or AJW  Qualified  Partners,  LLC no longer  hold  secured
     convertible debentures of the Company.

3.   In  consideration  of the Holder waiving his right to conversion  under the
     Financing  Documents,  Section  2. of the Note shall be  replaced  with the
     following:

"The Holder has the right to convert the  outstanding  principal  plus  interest
into common stock of the Company at a 50%  discount of the current  market price
at the time of conversion."

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the
Note Purchase Agreement as of the date first written above.

                                    COMPANY:

                                    IDIAL NETWORKS, INC.


                                    By:_____________________
                                    Name:
                                    Title:

                                    HOLDER:



                                    ------------------------
                                    Mark Wood
Exhibit 99.2

                            PRESIDENT'S CERTIFICATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report of The Bralorne Mining Company (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2002, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Rene Bernard,  President,  Chief  Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.




                                       /S/"Rene Bernard",
                                        ----------------
                                         Rene Bernard
                                  Chief  Executive  Officer
                                   President and Director

Date: January 12, 2004
Exhibit 23.1








Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We have issued our report dated December 10, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Key Technology, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Key Technology, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-71108, effective November 1, 1993; 333-2396, effective March 15, 1996; 333-128512, effective September 23, 2005; 333-50130, effective September 11, 2007; and 333-152506, effective July 24, 2008).




/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP





Seattle, Washington


December 10, 2010
Exhibit 32.3

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark E.
Scott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                        /s/ Mark E. Scott
                                        -----------------
                                        Mark E. Scott
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        February 3, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                    539,830
<SECURITIES>                              273,616
<RECEIVABLES>                              24,905
<ALLOWANCES>                              (20,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,130,007
<PP&E>                                  1,192,495
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          3,659,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,349,292
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                  105,162
<OTHER-SE>                              2,205,461
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            3,659,915
<SALES>                                   514,214
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          514,214
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        6,322,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (5,749,980)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                           (5,749,980)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0



</TABLE>
#### AMERICAN STORES CO. v. MURRAY et ux.

No. 6177.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Jan. 27, 1937.

*895Richard A. Smith, Louis Wagner, and Thomas J. Clary, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Maurice G. Weinberg, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below George Murray, a citizen of Pennsylvania, recovered a verdict against the American Stores Company, a corporate citizen of Delaware, for damages sustained by, him as the result of injury to his wife alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant. His wife also recovered a verdict for injuries suffered by her. The cases were tried by the same jury and on entry of judgments, the defendant took this appeal.

The proofs of the plaintiffs tended to show that defendant maintained a store and Mrs. Murray, who was a customer, entered the store and made a purchase. A step with risers led from the street to the store floor and on her stepping on the upper tread, it tilted and caused her to fall. A clerk who came out of the store and assisted her to a seat on the tilting step stamped on the nail to hold it in place. One witness who saw the accident testified he too was a customer at the store and that the step was “awful shaky”; that he had called the attention of several people to it and that “from time to -time I have taken my heel and mashed the nail down in the step for fear it would hook somebody’s feet.” Another customer testified that on her way out she fell on the steps because they were shaky.

On this appeal defendant contends it is not liable because “there is no proof that the defendant company had either actual or constructive notice” of the alleged condition of the step. After due consideration, we are of opinion no notice was required. The plaintiff Charlotte Murray was its commercial invitee. The store owed such customer the affirmative duty of keeping the store approach reasonably safe and of itself giving warning of its unsafe condition. The customer had a right to assume defendant had done its duty and, in the absence of any patent defect in the steps, was justified in using them. She was not required to stop and inspect the steps before using them. Notice of defects was to come from the store and not from the customer.

Finding no reversible error, the judgments below are affirmed.
EXHIBIT32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the undersigned ChiefFinancial Officer of Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the"Company"), hereby certify that thisamendment to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for theyear ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report")fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:May 25, 2004

|  | /s/ Howard B.Johnson Howard B. Johnson Chief FinancialOfficer |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------|

----