alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Nutritional Sourcing
 Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
 November 1, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
 the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William T. Keon III, Chief Executive
 Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
 the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
 Company.


 Dated:  January 28, 2004


                                                /s/ William T. Keon III
                                                ---------------------------
                                                William T. Keon III
                                                Chief Executive Officer


 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed
 as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

















<PAGE> 2
- 2 -
NO. 07-08-0475-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	APRIL 14, 2009

	______________________________

	JOSEPH G. NUNEZ,

										Appellant

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS,

										Appellees

	______________________________

	FROM THE 140th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2007-415790; HON. JIM BOB DARNELL, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

	Appellant Joseph G. Nunez appeals from his conviction for the offense of capital murder.  On March 6, 2009, the clerk’s record was filed.  The reporter’s record was due on March 5, 2009.  On March 13, 2009, this Court notified the reporter by letter that the record had not been filed and to advise the Court of the status of the record on or before March 23, 2009.  On March 24, 2009, the reporter filed a motion for extension of time to file the record, which was granted to April 6, 2009.  On April 8, 2009, the reporter filed a second extension motion requesting until June 8, 2009, to file the record.

	Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 140th District Court of Lubbock County (trial court) for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine:

		when the reporter’s record can reasonably be transcribed into written form and filed in a manner that does not further delay the prosecution of this appeal or have the practical effect of depriving the appellant of their right to appeal.

	The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed.  So too shall it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cause to be developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing, if any.  Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this court on or before May 14, 2009.  Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before May 14, 2009.

	It is so ordered.

							Per Curiam

Do not publish.
No. 72-1029.

#### District 65, Distributive Workers of America *v.*R & M Kaufmann, a Division of Russ Togs, Inc., et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as

adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of SRA International, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard J. Nadeau, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  August 17, 2012 | /S/ RICHARD J. NADEAU                               
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------
|                       | Richard J. Nadeau                                   
|                       | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                       | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 14-1909

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Jose Luis Sanchez Adame

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________

 Submitted: January 15, 2015

 Filed: January 21, 2015

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Jose Luis Sanchez Adame (Adame) challenges

his sentence imposed by the district court after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to

1

The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the

1

Southern District of Iowa.
distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture orsubstance containing methamphetamine,

and 50 grams or more of actual methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A) and 846. In a brief filed under Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), counsel argues that Adame’s 120-month prison sentence, a sentence 

below the Guidelines imprisonment range of 188-235 months, is unreasonable. The

argument fails, because 120 months wasthe statutoryminimum, the shortestsentence

possible absent a government motion. See 21 U.S.C § 841(b)(1)(A); United States

v. Woods, 717 F.3d 654, 659 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review; statutorymandatory

minimum sentence was shortest sentence possible absent government motion, and

was not substantively unreasonable). To the extent Adame’s pro se brief asserts a

challenge to the district court’s application of an aggravating-role enhancement in

determining Adame’s Guidelines imprisonment range, the enhancement had no

bearing on his ultimate sentence. 

We have independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s judgment. 

______________________________

-2-
S. 2787 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty three 

An Act 

To authorize the Federal Communications Commission to process applications for 

spectrum licenses from applicants who were successful bidders in an auction 

before the authority of the Commission to conduct auctions expired on March 

9, 2023. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘5G Spectrum Authority Licensing 

Enforcement Act’’ or the ‘‘5G SALE Act’’. 

SEC. 2. FCC PROCESSING OF APPLICATIONS FOR SPECTRUM LICENSES 

AWARDED BY AUCTION. 

In the case of any applicant for a license or permit for the 

use of spectrum in the band of frequencies between 2496 megahertz 

and 2690 megahertz, inclusive, that the Federal Communications 

Commission selected through a system of competitive bidding conducted under section 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934 

(47 U.S.C. 309(j)) on or before March 9, 2023, and to whom the 

Commission has not granted the license or permit as of the date 

of enactment of this Act, the Commission may process the application of the applicant during the 90-day period beginning on the 

date of enactment of this Act. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 8.1
  List of
Subsidiaries
  The
following is a list of the Company’s significant subsidiaries, all of which were
organized in Mexico:
  Radio
Stations:
  XEQR, S.A. de C.V.
  XERC,
S.A. de C.V.
  XEEST,
S.A. de C.V.
  XEQR-FM,
S.A. de C.V.
  XERC-FM,
S.A. de C.V.
  XEJP-FM,
S.A. de C.V.
  XEDKR-AM,
S.A. de C.V.
  XESTN-AM,
S.A. de C.V.
  Radio
Red, S.A. de C.V.
  Radio
Red-FM, S.A. de C.V.
  Radio
Sistema Mexicano, S.A.
  Estación
Alfa, S.A. de C.V.
  Emisora
1150, S.A. de C.V.
  
  Marketing
Companies:
  GRC
Comunicaciones, S.A. de C.V.
  GRC
Radiodifusión, S.A. (formerly Aerocer, S.A.)
  
  Service
Companies:
  Promotora
Técnica de Servicios Profesionales, S.A. de C.V.
  Publicidad
y Promociones Internacionales, S.A. de C.V.
  To2
México, S.A. de C.V.
  Promo
Red, S.A. de C.V.
  
 
  Real estate
Companies:
  Universal
de Muebles e Inmuebles, S.A. de C.V.
  Inmobiliaria
Radio Centro, S.A. de C.V.
  
  Sub-holding
Companies:
  Desarrollos
Empresariales, S.A. de C.V.
  Radiodifusión
Red, S.A. de C.V.
  Enlaces
Troncales, S.A. de C.V.
  
  Non-operating
Companies:
  Música,
Música, Música, S.A. de C.V.
  Promotora
de Éxitos, S.A. de C.V.
  Producciones
Artísticas Internacionales, S.A. de C.V.
  
  
  
 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40935 Conference Calendar

DEREK GLEN ADKINS, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus N. L. CONNOR, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CV-213

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Derek Glen Adkins, federal prisoner # 24400-077, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Because Adkins’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenged the validity of his conviction and sentence, Adkins had to show that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 provided him with an inadequate or ineffective remedy. Tolliver v. Dobre , 211 F.3d 876, 878 (5th Cir. 2000). “[T]he savings clause of [28 U.S.C.]No. 03-40935 -2-

** 347 U.S. 260 (1954). § 2255 applies to a claim (i) that is based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision which establishes that the petitioner may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense and (ii) that was foreclosed by circuit law at the time when the claim should have been raised in the petitioner’s trial, appeal, or first [28 U.S.C.] § 2255 motion.” Reyes-Requena v. United
States , 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Adkins argues that the indictment was defective and in violation of the fair warning, Accardi v. Shaughnessy , ** and no evidence doctrines because it failed to allege all elements of the offenses charged. Thus, he pleaded guilty to non-existent offenses and was actually innocent. Adkins’ claims are not based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision which establishes that he may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense. See Reyes-Requena , 243 F.3d at 904. To the extent that his claims are based upon the Supreme Court’s decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), Apprendi does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review and an Apprendi claim does not satisfy the test for filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition under the savings clause. See Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary, Beaumont, TX , 305 F.3d 343, 347-48 (5th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, Adkins fails to qualify for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255's savings clause provisions. The district court’s dismissal of Adkins’ 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition isNo. 03-40935 -3- therefore AFFIRMED. Adkins’ motion for leave to file a reply brief out of time is DENIED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
This directory does not contain a complete run of the journal as a complete run was not available at the time of harvest. 03/25/2014
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2777]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-81-001]


K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Tariff Filing

January 30, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 24, 1997 K N Interstate Gas 
Transmission Company Co. (KNI) tendered for filing as part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1-B, the following revised tariff 
sheets to be effective January 1, 1997:

First Revised Sheet No. 36
Substitute Original Sheet No. 89

    KNI states that these tariff sheets are being submitted to comply 
with the Commission's December 31, 1996 Order in this proceeding.
    KNI states that copies of the filing were served upon KNI's 
mainline jurisdictional customers, interested public bodies, and all 
parties to the proceedings.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such protests 
must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. All protests filed with the Commission will be considered 
by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not 
serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2777 Filed 2-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 1:05-cv-00316-MBC-SPB   Document 15   Filed 09/06/06   Page 1 of 1
| INTEGRITY MUTUALFUNDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | Exhibit 32.1 |
|----------------------------------------------|--------------|

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO				18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,				AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO				SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. (the"Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, asfiled with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Walstad, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to thebest of my knowledge: 

(1)          the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and 

(2)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

  
| Date:  March27, 2006 | By /s/ Robert E.Walstad |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|
|                      | Robert E.Walstad        |
|                      | Chief ExecutiveOfficer, |
|                      | Chairman, andDirector   |
#### Chester Amos ISSAC, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2310.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 17, 1969.

Robert G. Ferrell, III, Public Defender, Cocoa, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James M. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The record in this case permits an informed judgment by this court that the in-court identification by the victim had a source wholly independent of the police station lineup confrontation. This is the only point raised on appeal and the judgment is therefore affirmed on the authority of United States v. Wade, 1967, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149; Stovall v. Denno, 1967, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199, and Anderson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 618.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR

                      RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Pangea Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Charles B. Pollock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November12, 2004              By: /s/ Charles B. Pollock
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                    Charles B. Pollock
                                    Chief Executive Officer

                                       11
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

APPOINTMENT TO THE 

MINOR COURT RULES COMMITTEE

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 394 

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of February, 2016, Daniel G. Vitek, Esquire, Allegheny

County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Minor Court Rules Committee for a

term of three years.

Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
ARS HomeCrop Production and ProtectionPlant DiseasesResearch

----

- Joseph Munyaneza
- Tim Rinehart
- Oswald Crasta
- Jack Okamuro
- Roy Scott
2022 Research Highlights
- Combating Citrus Greening Disease
- Monitoring and Mitigating the Spread of Plant Disease
Program Input
- ARS Culture Collection
Program Planning
-                 Strategic Vision             
-                 Action Plan 2017-2021             
-                 Action Plan 2022-2026             
Program Reports
-                 Annual Reports             
-                 Retrospective Assessment 2020             
Project Information
- List of Projects in this Program
- List of Project Annual Reports in this program

**Listed below are the Annual Reports for currently active projects directly assigned to this National Program.**
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > U.S. Multinational Companies

              																	United States. Department of Commerce					 and 	United States. Bureau of Economic Analysis. 						*U.S. Multinational Companies : U.S. Merchandise Trade, Worldwide Sales, and Technology-Related Activities in 1977*,										August 1983,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/337,			accessed on September 14, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### J. I. KISLAK MORTGAGE CORPORATION OF FLORIDA, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. Dock ROBERTS and Lorene Roberts, a/k/a Lorene P. Roberts, his wife, North Broward Hospital District, a Special Tax District, and M. I. Robbins, Appellees.

No. 69-689.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 13, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 17, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John DEFRANCES, Jeffrey Defrances, Allen Defrances, Kimberly Bishop, Lynn Lewis, Tonya Baker and Sue Gamble.

No. 60575.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 4, 1977.

Amended Order Dec. 5, 1977.

In re: John Defrances, et al. applying for writ of certiorari (review) prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied as to Assignment No. 1. Writ granted as to Assignment No. 2. The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Monty M. Wyche, Judge of the 26th Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Bossier, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 20th day of December, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this Court why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

AMENDED ORDER

Writ denied as to Assignment No. Writ granted as to Assignment No. 2. 1.
#### STATE of Louisiana Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 6276.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Feb. 6, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 29, 1978.

Sanders, Downing, Kean & Cazdessus by R. Gordon Kean, Jr., Baton Rouge, Plauche, Smith, Hebert & Nieset by Reid K. Hebert, Lake Charles, for defendants-appellants.

Jonathan C. Harris, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellee.

*569Before GUIDRY, FORET and JOHNSON, JJ.

FORET, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the companion case of *State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Highways v. National Advertising Company,*356 So.2d 557 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1978), in which a separate decision has been rendered by us on this date, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed to the appellants in these consolidated cases, each appellant to bear costs equal to the proportion which the number of signs in issue owned by it bears to the total number of signs in issue owned by all the appellants.

AFFIRMED.