alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 30 

To authorize major medical facility projects for the Department of Veterans 

Affairs for fiscal year 2023, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 2023 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize major medical facility projects for the Department of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2023, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Year 2023 Vet5 erans Affairs Major Medical Facility Authorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF MAJOR MEDICAL FACILITY 

7 PROJECTS OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

8 AFFAIRS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

10 may carry out the following major medical facility projects 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 30 IS

1 in fiscal year 2023 at the locations specified and in an 

2 amount for each project not to exceed the amount speci3 fied for such location: 

4 (1) Construction of a community-based out5 patient clinic and national cemetery in Alameda, 

6 California, in an amount not to exceed 

7 $395,000,000. 

8 (2) Construction of a community living center 

9 and renovation of domiciliary and outpatient facili10 ties in Canandaigua, New York, in an amount not 

11 to exceed $506,400,000. 

12 (3) Construction of a new health care center in 

13 El Paso, Texas, in an amount not to exceed 

14 $700,000,000. 

15 (4) Seismic upgrade and specialty care improve16 ments in Fort Harrison, Montana, in an amount not 

17 to exceed $88,600,000. 

18 (5) Realignment and closure of the Livermore 

19 campus in Livermore, California, in an amount not 

20 to exceed $490,000,000. 

21 (6) Construction of a new medical facility in 

22 Louisville, Kentucky, in an amount not to exceed 

23 $1,013,000,000. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 30 IS

1 (7) Seismic retrofit and renovation of buildings 

2 100 and 101 in Portland, Oregon, in an amount not 

3 to exceed $523,000,000. 

4 (8) Replacement of the VA Sierra Nevada 

5 Health Care System Medical Center in Reno, Ne6 vada, in an amount not to exceed $223,800,000. 

7 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

8 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Veterans 

9 Affairs for fiscal year 2023 or the year in which funds 

10 are appropriated for the Construction, Major Projects ac11 count, $3,939,800,000 for the projects authorized in sub12 section (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-63863, No. 333-63861, No. 33-66624, No. 33-85420
and No. 333-00404) of Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc. of our report dated
October 8, 1999 relating to the financial statements, which appears on page 32
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Washington, D.C.
October 27, 1999
#### Patricia A. KUHNS, Appellant, v. The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-352.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec 17, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Graham JACKSON, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-173.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 19, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INDUSTRIAL OUTDOOR DISPLAYS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 6274.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Feb. 6, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 29, 1978.

Sanders, Downing, Kean & Cazdessus by R. Gordon Kean, Jr., Baton Rouge, Plauche, Smith, Hebert & Nieset by Reid K. Hebert, Lake Charles, for defendants-appellants.

Jonathan C. Harris, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GUIDRY, FORET and JOHNSON, JJ.

FORET, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the companion case of *State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Highways v. National Advertising Company,*356 So.2d 557 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1978), in which a separate decision has been rendered by us on this date, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed to the appellants in these consolidated cases, each appellant to bear costs equal to the proportion which the number of signs in issue owned by it bears to the total number of signs in issue owned by all the appellants.

AFFIRMED.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

29–011 2013

113th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 113–57 

AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR LOCALITY PAY 

INCREASES 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR LOCALITY PAY INCREASES PAYABLE 

TO CIVILIAN FEDERAL EMPLOYEES COVERED BY THE GENERAL 

SCHEDULE (GS) AND CERTAIN OTHER PAY SYSTEMS FOR 2014, 

PURSUANT TO 5 U.S.C. 5305(a)(3) 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2013.—Referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform and ordered to be printed 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with HDOCE:\Seals\Congress.#13

pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with HDOC
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, August 30, 2013. 

Hon. JOHN BOEHNER, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: I am transmitting an alternative plan for 

pay increases for civilian Federal employees covered by the General 

Schedule (GS) and certain other pay systems for 2014. 

Civilian Federal employees have already made significant sacrifices as a result of a three-year pay freeze. As our country continues to recover from serious economic conditions affecting the 

general welfare, however, we must maintain efforts to keep our Nation on a sustainable fiscal course. 

Accordingly, I have determined that it is appropriate to exercise 

my statutory alternative plan authority under 5 U.S.C. 5303(b) and 

5304a to set alternative 2014 across-the-board and locality pay adjustments. Specifically, I have determined that for 2014, across-theboard pay increases will be 1.0 percent, and the current locality 

pay percentages shown in Schedule 9 of Executive Order 13641 of 

April 5, 2013, will remain at their 2013 levels. This decision will 

not materially affect the Federal Government’s ability to attract 

and retain a well-qualified Federal workforce. 

The adjustments described above shall take effect on the first applicable pay period beginning on or after January 1, 2014. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with HDOC
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Richard J. Westin, Chief Executive Officer of Agemark Corporation (the
Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to which this
certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and



| |                                                                                                                                                            
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrant.

|                    |  |                                           |  | 
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: May 29, 2003 |  | /s/ RICHARD J. WESTIN                     |  | 
|                    |  |                                           |  | 
|                    |  | Richard J. Westin
Chief Executive Officer |  | 

19
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350 Certification of Principal Accounting Officer*

I, Mark E. Lemma, the Chief
Financial Officer of ALCiS Health, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), certify pursuant to section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                      |  |                               
| |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------------
| |  | Dated: June 27, 2008
| |  |                     
| |  | By:                  |  | /s/ MARK E LEMMA              
| |  |                      |  | Chief Financial Officer       
| |  |                      |  | (Principal Accounting Officer)



|* | The material contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of IKON Receivables, LLC and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0001077175
<NAME> IKON RECEIVABLES, LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     Sep-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                          1
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                           1,728,134<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                0
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          1,822,777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           0
<BONDS>                                 1,414,614
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                403,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            1,822,777
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          113,356
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            6,235
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         58,198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            48,923
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        48,923
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               48,923
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0<F2>
<FN>
<F1> Includes net investments in leases of $1,679,654  and other accounts
     receivable.
<F2> Not required as the registrant is a wholly-owned subsidiary.
</FN>


</TABLE>
PUBLIC LAW 104–151—JULY 1, 1996 110 STAT. 1383

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3029 (S. 1510):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–588 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Feb. 7, S. 1510 considered and passed Senate.

June 10, H.R. 3029 considered and passed House.

June 18, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–151

104th Congress

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse in Washington, District of Columbia,

as the ‘‘E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF COURTHOUSE.

The United States courthouse located at 3rd Street and Constitution Avenue, Northwest, in Washington, District of Columbia,

shall be designated and known as the ‘‘E. Barrett Prettyman United

States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the

‘‘E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse’’.

Approved July 1, 1996.

40 USC 129a

note.

40 USC 129a

note.

July 1, 1996

[H.R. 3029]
PUBLIC LAW 104–149—MAY 29, 1996 110 STAT. 1379

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2066:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–561 (Comm. on Economic and Educational Opportunities).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

May 14, considered and passed House.

May 16, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–149

104th Congress

An Act

To amend the National School Lunch Act to provide greater flexibility to schools

to meet the Dietary Guidelines for Americans under the school lunch and school

breakfast programs.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Healthy Meals for Children

Act’’.

SEC. 2. INCREASED FLEXIBILITY FOR SCHOOLS TO MEET THE DIETARY

GUIDELINES FOR AMERICANS UNDER THE NATIONAL

SCHOOL LUNCH ACT.

Section 9(f)(2) of the National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C.

1758(f)(2)) is amended by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting

the following:

‘‘(D) USE OF ANY REASONABLE APPROACH.—

‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—A school food service authority may use

any reasonable approach, within guidelines established by the

Secretary in a timely manner, to meet the requirements of

this paragraph, including—

‘‘(I) using the school nutrition meal pattern in effect

for the 1994–1995 school year; and

‘‘(II) using any of the approaches described in subparagraph (C).

‘‘(ii) NUTRIENT ANALYSIS.—The Secretary may not require

a school to conduct or use a nutrient analysis to meet the

requirements of this paragraph.’’.

Approved May 29, 1996.

42 USC 1751

note.

Healthy Meals

for Children Act.

May 29, 1996

[H.R. 2066]
Exhibit 3.1a

**AMENDMENT TO THE BYLAWS**

**OF**

**DWS RREEF REAL ESTATE FUND, INC.**

 

This Amendment to the Bylaws of DWS RREEF Real Estate Fund, Inc., a Maryland corporation, is effective as of March 11, 2009.  

 

The Bylaws are hereby amended as follows (underlined text is added, deleted text is stricken):

1.     The heading of Section 6 of Article II of the Bylaws is hereby amended from “Quorum” to “Quorum; Adjournment.”

2.         The second paragraph of Section 6 of Article II of the Bylaws is hereby amended as follows (double underline indicates addition; strikethrough indicates deletion):

 

“Whether or not a quorum is present at any meeting of stockholders,~~If, however, such quorum shall not be present at any meeting of the stockholders~~, the chairman of the meeting or the stockholders entitled to vote at such meeting, present in person or by proxy, shall have the power to adjourn the meeting from time to time to a date not more than 120 days after the original record date without notice other than announcement at the meeting.  At such adjourned meeting at which a quorum shall be present, any business may be transacted which might have been transacted at the meeting as originally notified.”
#### William H. Paul DANIEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-444.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Oct. 23, 1969.

William H. Paul Daniel, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Horace A. Knowlton, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

*337PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant’s post-conviction motion to mitigate the sentences imposed upon him and to permit him to withdraw his plea of guilty to charges of breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and for unlawful possession of narcotic drugs is affirmed on the authority of Parker v. State, 214 So.2d 632 (Fla.App.1968); and Pitts v. State, 181 So. 2d 739 (Fla.App. 1966).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27466]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel for Genetics; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Panel for Genetics (1149) (Panel A).
    Date and Time: Thursday, November 6, 1997 through Friday, 
November 7, 1997, 8:30 am to 5 pm.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
360, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Philip Harriman, Program Director for 
Microbial Genetics, Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, 
Room 655, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 306-1439.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate research proposals submitted to 
the Microbial Genetics Program as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 10, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-27466 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
EXHIBIT
32
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (SUBSECTIONS
(a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
 UNITED
STATES CODE)
 
 Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Trestle Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “10-KSB Report”) that:
 
 (1)
    the
      10-KSB Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 (2)
    the
      information contained in the 10-KSB Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company. 
 
 
 
 Date:
March 30, 2005   /s/
MAURIZIO VECCHIONE
 Maurizio
Vecchione
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Date:
March 30, 2005   /s/
BARRY HALL__________
 Barry
Hall
 President,
Chief Financial Officer and
 Corporate
Secretary
Order entered December 19, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01183
- CV IN RE JAMES DONDERO, Relator
O rigina l Proceeding from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 11
- 16417



### O RDER Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of
mandamus. We LIFT the Court’s October 15, 2018 stay of the trial court’s July 23, 2018 “Temporary Order During Appeal.”

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
### SERVED: SEPTEMBER 23, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF ARCTIC AIR ALASKA, INC. DOCKETNO. FAA2014-0316 (Civil Penalty Action).

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DECISION ';'

OnJuly 22,2014 the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA") filed a Motionfor Decision. On August 26, 2014 we served our Orderto Show Cause. On September 8, 2014, Arctic Air Alaska, Inc. (hereinafter "Respondent") filed a letter whichwe treated as aresponse to our Order to Show Cause. In Respondent's letter he represents Respondent is a small company. Respondent is currently

### prose. We amended our Procedural Order. We will treat Respondent's letter as an Answer to the Complaint. Respondent also filed tax returns which we will seal under Protective Order until further review. WHEREFORE, FAA's Motion for Decision and Respondent's letter having beenread and considered itbe and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. FAA's Motion for Decision is DENIED, without prejudice.

....,. ., :,-: i
.**~** .. :':"\,. '·· ·-,,
Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment- Service List
1SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ·
James I.Hamilton, President /CEO Arctic Air Alaska, Inc., 

### Respondent 3540 University Ave. South Fairbanks, AK 99709 Peter Lynch, 

### Complainant's Counsel Assistant Chief Counsel for Enforcement Office ofthe Chief Counsel, AGC-300 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591

TEL: 202-267-7728 FAX: 202-267-5106 ONE COPY



### The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 Docket No. FAA-2014-0316 (Civil Penalty Action)

1

### S~rvice was by

# p.s. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following

address: Federa Aviation Administration, 600 IndependenceAvenue, S.W., WilburWrig_htBuilding-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430.
2
#### Leroy COLBROTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-538.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 5, 1969.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; John G. Ferris, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Case 1:06-cv-00199-MBC   Document 4   Filed 09/11/06   Page 1 of 1