alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of TransDigm Holding Company
(the "Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

        (i)     the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
     for the quarterly period ended March 29, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
     with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated: May 12, 2003                           /s/ W. Nicholas Howley
                                             ---------------------------
                                             W. Nicholas Howley
                                             Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
No. 00-7056.

#### Parrott *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

APPOINTMENT TO THE MINOR COURT RULES COMMITTEE : : : : : NO. 394 MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

**ORDER PER CURIA** **M AN**  **D NOW**  , this 19 th day of February , 2016, Daniel G. Vitek, Esquire, Allegheny County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Minor Court Rules Committee for a term of three years. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26360]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984.
    Interested parties can review or obtain copies of agreements at the 
Washington, DC offices of the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, 
N.W., Room 962. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement 
to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, 
within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.

Agreement No.: 224-201033
Title: Broward County/Maritime Entertainment Terminal Agreement
Parties:
    Broward County, Florida (Port Everglades)
    Maritime Entertainment, Ltd., Inc.
Synopsis: The proposed Agreement authorizes Broward County to provide 
berthing and related terminal facilities, and passenger wharfage at a 
reduced rate, to Maritime Entertainment in exchange for its agreement 
to provide daily passenger cruise service from Port Everglades.

    Dated: September 30, 1997.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26360 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 126 (Thursday, June 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 38371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16658]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

Sunshine Act Meeting

    The White House Council for Community Solutions gives notice of the 
following meeting:

DATE AND TIME: Friday, July 15, 2011, 3 p.m.-4 p.m. Eastern Daylight 
Time.

PLACE: The Council will meet via phone conference call. The meeting 
will be open to the public in Listen-Only mode and it will be recorded. 
To dial in, please call 1-866-525-0652. More details and materials will 
be available on the Council's Web site (http://www.serve.gov/communitysolutions) on Thursday, July 14th.

PUBLIC COMMENT: The public is invited to submit publicly available 
comments through the Council's Web site. To send statements to the 
Council, please send written statements to the Council's electronic 
mailbox at WhiteHouseCouncil@cns.gov. The public can also follow the 
Council's work by visiting its Web site: http://www.serve.gov/communitysolutions.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The purpose of this meeting is to review the 
Council's recommended next steps. The recommendations are the result of 
what the Council has learned through its outreach and other efforts 
about issues facing young Americans who are neither in school nor in 
the workplace and promising solutions to address this challenge. These 
recommendations will guide the work of the Council going forward.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Leslie Boissiere, Executive 
Director, White House Council for Community Solutions, Corporation for 
National and Community Service, 10th Floor, Room 10911, 1201 New York 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone: (202) 606-3910. Fax: (202) 
606-3464. E-mail: lboissiere@cns.gov.

    Dated: June 28, 2011.
Leslie Boissiere,
Executive Director, White House Council for Community Solutions.
[FR Doc. 2011-16658 Filed 6-28-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-$$-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26953]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-151-006]


Mid Louisiana Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes In FERC Gas 
Tariff

October 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 1, 1997, Mid Louisiana Gas Company (Mid 
Louisiana) tendered for filing to be included in its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following Tariff Sheets, with an 
effective date of November 1, 1997:

Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 77
Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 78
Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 79
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 87
Second Revised Sheet No. 166

    Mid Louisiana asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply 
with the Commission's Letter Order, dated July 15, 1997 in Docket No. 
RP97-151-002 wherein the Commission directed Mid Louisiana to revise 
previously submitted PRO FORMA sheets to reflect version numbers for 
certain GISB standards incorporated by Mid Louisiana into its tariff 
provisions by reference and to include GISB Standard 2.3.31 by 
reference.
    The modifications evidenced on the enclosed tariff sheets reflect 
Mid Louisiana's compliance with such directives. The sheet(s) are 
submitted as directed in FERC Order No. 587-C (78 FERC para. 61,231) 
with an effective date of November 1, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest said compliance filing should file a 
protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 
385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests 
should be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this compliance 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26953 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana Corporation, Appellant, v. SMITH & SAPP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 70-801.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 16, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
July 6, 2011 

Mr. Craig Chilcote 

Vice President Safety, Security and Compliance 

Pinnacle Airlines, Inc. 

1689 Nonconnoh Boulevard, Ste. 111 

Memphis, TN 38132 

Dear Mr. Chilcote: 

This is in response to your June 23, 2011 letter (public docket No. FAA-2011-0049) 

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Pinnacle Airlines, Inc, 

(Pinnacle) for a reconsideration of denial of an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Pinnacle to operate its 

drug and alcohol testing program in unison with Mesaba Aviation, Inc. d.b.a. Mesaba 

Airlines (Mesaba), drug and alcohol program. 

After careful consideration, the FAA does not consider this a reconsideration of our denial 

based on your admission that the plans for the merger of Mesaba have changed. Because of 

your new situation and circumstances you should submit a new request for exemption, based 

on the current merger with Mesaba and Colgan. It's important that you include the facts and 

circumstances of how this exemption would meet Part 11 requirements. For us to consider 

the new request, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it 

would benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2

Lastly, to ensure every aspect would be considered, please ensure your new petition for 

exemption is coordinated along with Colgan’s petition. 

At this time, we will take no further action on your petition. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Ida M. Klepper 

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division
EXHIBIT 10.6 Loan Application Form September 11, 2006 Translated From Japanese  Dear Risona Bank,  I would like to apply for the loan with the details below.  Address:
        West Shinjuku Showa bldg. 11F,
 1-13-12, Nishi-Shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku. Tokyo
 I.A. Partners K.K.
  Name:
        Representative Director
 Hideki Anan
  Amount Requested
        45,000,000 YEN
        
        
        
        
        Desired Loan
        1.625%Desired date of loan
        September 11, 2006
        
        
        
        
        interest rateDesired term of loan
        August 31,2007Fund Allocation
        working fund/funds of equipment/others (amount) 45,000,000 YEN
        Financial PlanRisona Bank 45,000,000 YENPayment Resources
        Collected SalesMethod of Repayment
        November 11, 2006 is the first repayment date, and after that, 4,500,000 YEN should be repaid every end of the month,and 4,500,000 YEN should be repaid by the final repayment due date.Method of InterestPayment
        On the day of loan, the amount up to the mid-term of your specified term of loan should be paid in advance.After that, the amount for the next installment payment date or loan term is paid in advance on everyinstallment payment dateSecurity for loan
        Hideki AnanTime deposit of 45,000,000 YEN
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-K/A
AMENDMENT NUMBER 2

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE 
ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996

Commission file number 0-21976

ATLANTIC COAST AIRLINES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

	Delaware	                               	13-3621051
	(State of incorporation)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

	515-A Shaw Road, Dulles, Virginia						      20166
	(Address of principal executive offices)			(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (703) 925-6000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock par value $ .02       	NASDAQ National Market
            (Title of Class)   (Name of each exchange on which registered)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports 
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the 
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject 
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
	Yes   X   		No__

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to 
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be 
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or 
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this 
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ______

The aggregate market value of voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the 
registrant as of March 11, 1997 was approximately $112,810,113

As of  March  11, 1997 there were 8,519,578 shares of Common Stock of 
the registrant issued and 8,507,078 shares of Common Stock were 
outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Certain portions of the documents listed below have been incorporated by 
reference into the indicated part of this Form 10-K.

Document Incorporated				Part of Form 10-K
Proxy Statement for 1996 Annual	 Meeting of Shareholders Part III, Items 
10-13


Introductory Statement

The following is being filed to amend the Company's Annual Report on 
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 to add to the Form 10-K the
attached Exhibit 10.40.







SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 
the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by 
the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.





						ATLANTIC COAST AIRLINES, INC.



April 1, 1997				By:	/S/ Paul H. Tate	

							Paul H. Tate
							Senior Vice President and 	
						Chief Financial Officer


April 1, 1997				By: 	/S/ Kerry B. Skeen		
							Kerry B. Skeen
							President and Chief 		
						Executive Officer
Exhibit  32.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alexis Korybut, Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)  the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Tactical
      Air Defense Services, Inc.November
      19, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Alexis
      KorybutAlexis
      KorybutChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SYDNEY E. SMITH, III, et al., )

Plaintiffs, )

v. ) C.A. No. 02-264 Erie

) District Judge McLaughlin

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Magistrate Judge Baxter

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff’s complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on September 5, 2002, and was

referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for a report and recommendation

in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the

Local Rules for Magistrates. On July 23, 2004, this Court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s report

recommending that we grant in part and deny in part Defendant’s motion for partial summary

judgment. On March 31, 2005, Plaintiff filed a motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. #54),

and this case was again referred to Magistrate Judge Baxter for a report and recommendation. On

May 6, 2005, Defendant filed a cross motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. #61). 

The Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation (Doc. #69), filed on July 22, 2005,

recommended that the District Court grant the Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment

and deny the Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment. The parties were allowed ten (10)

days from the date of service to file objections. Objections were filed by Plaintiff on August 1, 2005

(Dkt. #73). After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the

report and recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 19th Day of September, 2005;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

(Doc. #61) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc.#54) is

DENIED.

Case 1:02-cv-00264-SJM Document 82 Filed 09/19/05 Page 1 of 2
The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated July 22, 2005, is adopted

as the opinion of the court.

/s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

SEAN J. McLAUGHLIN

United States District Judge

cc: Susan Paradise Baxter

 U.S. Magistrate Judge

all parties of record _____

Case 1:02-cv-00264-SJM Document 82 Filed 09/19/05 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. CP88-391-021 and RP93-162-006]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Annual 
Cash-Out Report

October 8, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 25, 1997, Transcontinental Gas Pipe 
Line Company (Transco) filed its annual report of cash-out purchases 
for the period August 1, 1996, through July 31, 1997. The report was 
filed to comply with the cash-out provisions in Section 15 of the 
General Terms and Conditions of Transco's FERC Gas Tariff.
    Pursuant to the requirements of the Commission's order issued 
December 3, 1993, in Docket No. RP93-162-002, Transco also submitted a 
summary of activity showing the volumes and amounts paid under each 
Pipeline Interconnect Balancing Agreement during the aforementioned 
period.
    Transco states that the report shows that for the annual period 
ending July 31, 1997, Transco had a net underrecovery of $6,128,461. 
Transco has carried forward a net underrecovery of $1,268,589 from the 
previous twelve-month period. This results in a net underrecovery cash-
out balance of $7,397,050 as of July 31, 1997. Transco states that in 
accordance with Section 15 of its tariff it will carry forward such net 
underrecovery to offset any net overrecovery that may occur in future 
cash-out periods.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before October 16, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27174 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                           |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ James              W.              France                                                                                                             |   |   |   |
| James                W. FrancePresident                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal                Executive Officer)November                10, 2006 |   |   |        |

|                                                                                                     |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Wade                S.                Estep                                                     |   |   |   |
| Wade                  S. EstepChief                  Financial OfficerNovember                  10, 2006 |   |   |        |

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6078
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ZAFAR AZIZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR92-341-S, CA-96-3909-S) Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 6, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Zafar Aziz, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Aziz v. United States , CR-92-341-S (D. Md. Dec. 26, 1996).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
254 La. 917

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert E. DAVIS.

No. 50245.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1969.

In re: Robert E. Davis applying for writ of habeas corpus and speedy trial.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.