alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
                                                                    ------------


                                  CERTIFICATION

I,  Timothy  R.  Kasmoch,  President  and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of N-Viro International
Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Dated:  April  2,  2007


/s/ Timothy  R.  Kasmoch
------------------------
Timothy  R.  Kasmoch
President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer
Exhibit 31.4

GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John B. Green, certify
that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                             
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 5, 2006 |  | /s/ John B. Green                                           
|                      |  | John B. Green                                               
|                      |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 20, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 20, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0013. WASEEM DAKER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2020CV355699
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Micros- to-Mainframes,Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve H. Rothman
Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
        section 78m(a)); and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
        all material respects, the financial condition and result of
        operations of the Company.


/s/  Steve H. Rothman
       ----------------------
     Steve H. Rothman
     Chairman and
     Chief Financial Officer
     June 26, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from this Form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,720
<SECURITIES>                                       249
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,835
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,263
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,837
<PP&E>                                           8,299
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,426
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          6
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,444)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,497
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,701
<CGS>                                           18,013
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,851)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (30,851)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (30,851)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.22)


</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND
RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE U.S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sense Technologies
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and Rule 13a-14(b), that to his
knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





|Dated: October 20, 2006 | By: | /s/ Bruce E. Schreiner                         
|----------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------
|                        |     | Bruce E. Schreiner                             
|                        |     | President and Principal Financial
      Officer

---
#### Raymond GEIGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-479.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Dec. 3, 1969.

Walter N. Colbath, Public Defender, and Bruce J. Daniels, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on before us on a motion filed by the public defender for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit to withdraw as counsel of record in connection with the present appeal because of an asserted conflict of interest between himself and the appellant. The public defender alleges that the appellant desires to argue before this court as a ground for reversal that he did not have competent counsel in the trial court. Since the appellant was represented by the public defender during trial, the public defender contends that a conflict of interest now arises between himself and the appellant.

It is our view that the issue of the competency of trial counsel cannot be raised in connection with a full appeal from the adjudication and sentence which is what we have before us at the present time. We are persuaded to this view by several reasons. First, we believe that it is implicit in the Florida Appellate Rules that only judicial errors may be reviewed on full appeal. See Rule 3.5(c) FAR, 32 F.S.A., which states that assignments of error shall designate “identified judicial *450acts.” Incompetent performance by counsel is not a *judicial*act.

Secondly, any denial of the appellant’s right to competent counsel may be raised by the appellant by a motion to vacate filed pursuant to Rule 1.850 Cr. P.R., 33 F.S.A. A motion filed under Rule 1.850 places the issue where it may best be determined in the first instance, i. e., in the trial court in which the appellant was convicted.

Finally, it is our view that if we granted the present motion, the purpose of the public defender’s office could be largely frustrated by frequent and bogus claims of incompetency which would lead to equally frequent motions to withdraw.

For the foregoing reasons, the aforesaid motion be and the same is hereby denied.

McCAIN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
#### Merle H. HORWITZ, Robert Dale Heron, and Eleanor Welgoss, Appellants, v. Henry END, Appellee.

No. 70-366.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 9, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 25, 1971.

Smith, Mandler, Smith & Parker, and Joe N. Unger, Miami Beach, for appellants.

*118Sams, Anderson, Alper & Spencer; Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Herron v. Passailaique, 92 Fla. 818, 110 So. 539; Peterson v. Paoli, Fla. 1950, 44 So.2d 639; Hinchee v. Fisher, Fla.1957, 93 So.2d 351; Welgoss v. End, Fla.App. 1959, 112 So.2d 390; Porter v. Porter, 101 Ariz. 131, 416 P.2d 564; Hammell v. Britton, 19 Cal.2d 72, 119 P.2d 333; Kessler v. Fauquier National Bank, 195 Va. 1095, 81 S.E.2d 440.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0369

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ERIN ELLIOT HOLCOMB,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 4, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 29 2024

07/29/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0369
#### N. A. JOHANSEN v. PORT JEWELL, INC. and Edward J. Jewell. Alfred C. NOYES v. PORT JEWELL, INC. and Edward J. Jewell.

No. 61004.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

In re: Edward Jewell and Associates, Inc., Edward J. Jewell and Bonnie C. Je*706well, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 351 So.2d 184.

Not considered; the judgment complained of is final; there was no application for rehearing in the court of appeal.

MARCUS, J., recused, having acted on case in trial court.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26881]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: NICHD Training Grant Review.
    Date: October 22-23, 1997.
    Time: October 22-8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; October 23-8:00 a.m.-
adjournment.
    Place: Holiday Inn--Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver 
Spring, Maryland 20910.
    Contact Person: Gopal M. Bhatnagar, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, DSR, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5E01, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892. Telephone: 301-496-1485.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review research grant 
applications.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. The 
discussion of these applications could reveal confidential trade 
secrets of commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. [93.864, 
Population Research and No. 93.865, Research for Mothers and 
Children], National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-26881 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-23-00205-CV

IN RE PENNENERGY RESOURCES, LLC

Original Proceeding

From the 82nd District Court

Robertson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 22-09-21523-CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator PennEnergy Resources, LLC’s “Petition for Writ of Mandamus” is denied. 

Relator’s “Verified Emergency Motion to Stay Pending Mandamus Review” is dismissed 

as moot.

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and 

Justice Smith

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed July 7, 2023

[OT06]
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.17

December 23, 2002

William C. Park
Chief Executive Officer
Digital Impact, Inc.
177 Bovet Road, Suite 200
San Mateo, CA 94402

RE:      RETENTION PROGRAM AMENDMENT

Dear Bill:

         Reference is made to the letter dated January 11, 2002 describing your
Retention Program approved by our board of directors (the "LETTER"). As we have
discussed, both you and the Company agree that it would be in the best interests
of the Company and its stockholders to amend the Letter to delay the first
payment under the Program as set forth below. All capitalized terms used herein
without definition shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Letter.

         Under the Letter, your retention payment schedule provides for payments
of $100,000 on each of the following dates, subject to your continued Service
with the Company on that date:

                                 January 1, 2003
                                 January 1, 2004
                                 January 1, 2005

         The Letter is hereby amended to provide for the payment of $100,000 on
each of the following dates, subject to the same conditions as set forth in the
Letter:

                                 July 1, 2003
                                 January 1, 2004
                                 January 1, 2005

         Except as otherwise modified herein, all terms of the Letter shall
remain in full force and effect. This agreement may only be amended, modified or
terminated by an agreement in writing signed by you and the Company. This
agreement shall be binding upon the Company and its successors and assigns.

<PAGE>

         This agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of
California without regard to principles of conflict of laws.

Very truly yours,

DIGITAL IMPACT, INC.

By:_____________________________________
   David Oppenheimer
   Senior Vice President &
   Chief Financial Officer

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

________________________________________
William C. Park

                                       2
Exhibit 23.1




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement Nos.
333-50130, 33-71108, and 33-32396 of Key Technology, Inc. on Form S-8 of our
report dated November 13, 2000 (December 14, 2000 as to information in Note 6),
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Key Technology, Inc. for the year
ended September 30, 2000.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Portland, Oregon
December 14, 2000

























                                       60
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of QCR Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), I, Douglas M. Hultquist, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Douglas M. Hultquist                        

 

 

 

Douglas M. Hultquist

Chief Executive Officer

January 5, 2016
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KEVIN L. BURROWS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) Civil Action No. 09-314 Erie

)

JEFFREY BEARD, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on December

16, 2009 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter

for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [10], filed on January 22,

2010, recommends that the within action be dismissed as legally frivolous in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the

date of service in which to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified

mail at SCI Rockview, where he is incarcerated. No objections were filed. After de

novo review of the complaint and documents in the case, together with the Report and

Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 17 day of February, 2010; th

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within action be, and hereby is,

DISMISSED as legally frivolous in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter [10], dated

January 22, 2010, is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

 s/ SEAN J. McLAUGHLIN

Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: all parties of record 

United States Magistrate Judge Baxter

Case 1:09-cv-00314-SJM-SPB Document 11 Filed 02/17/10 Page 1 of 1
#### AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Appellant, v. David LOWRY, a minor, by and through his father and next friend, Ernest Lowry, Appellee.

No. 77-1255.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 20, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 28, 1978.

*440Ress, Gomez, Rosenberg, Berke *&*How-land and Roland H. Gomez, North Miami, for appellant.

Schwartz, Klein & Steinhardt and Norman S. Klein, North Miami Beach, for ap-pellee.

Before BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: *Carol City Utilities, Inc. v. Gaines Construction Co.,*201 So.2d 242 (Fla.3d DCA 1967); Section 682.13, Florida Statutes (1975).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26931]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-20-010]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Changes In FERC Gas Tariff

October 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 1, 1997, El Paso Natural Gas Company 
(El Paso), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1-A, the following tariff sheets, effective November 
1, 1997.

Second Revised Sheet No. 202A
Second Revised Sheet No. 202B

    El Paso states that the tariff sheets are being filed to implement 
the scheduling and invoicing standards from the second phase (Round 2) 
of the Gas Industry Standards Board (GISB) standards Order No. 587-C.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26931 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M