alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26226]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-535-000]


MIGC, Inc., Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

September 29, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 24, 1997, MIGC, Inc. (MIGC) tendered 
for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, 
First Revised Sheet No. 37, with an effective date of November 1, 1997.
    MIGC states that the filing is being filed pursuant to Subpart C of 
Part 154 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Regulations 
Under the Natural Gas Act and Order No. 636-C issued February 27, 1997 
at Docket Nos. RM91-11-006 and RM87-34-072 (Order No. 636-C)
    MIGC states that this tariff sheet revises the Right-of-First 
Refusal provision to provide for a five year maximum term for bid 
evaluations.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26226 Filed 10-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
RECORD OF COMMUNICATION

TELEPHONE CALL

DATE: August 3, 2012

SUBJECT: Los Angeles County Sanitation District – Discharge Limit for Industrial Wastewater –

Oil and Grease

FROM: Nicole Law – EPA Region IX, Rules Office

Stanley Tong – EPA Region IX, Rules Office

TO: Kai Kuo – Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Sanitation District, Industrial 

Waste Section, (562) 908-4288 x 2913

SUMMARY OF COMMUNICATION:

1. The limit for disposal of <25,000 gallons/day wastewater through the sanitary sewer system from oil 

fields is 60 mg/L non-polar oil and grease.

2. The limit for disposal of >25,000 gallons/day wastewater from oil fields is 75 mg/L total oil and 

grease.

3. The 60 – 75 mg/L limit is not specifically listed on their discharge limit web site. There are limits for 

the disposal of other contaminates into the industrial sewer system. 

http://www.lacsd.org/wastewater/industrial_waste/iwpolicies/discharge_limits.asp
Case 1:04-cv-00138-MBC Document 9 Filed 08/23/06 Page 1 of 9Case 1:04-cv-00138-MBC Document 9 Filed 08/23/06 Page 2 of 9Case 1:04-cv-00138-MBC Document 9 Filed 08/23/06 Page 3 of 9Case 1:04-cv-00138-MBC Document 9 Filed 08/23/06 Page 4 of 9Case 1:04-cv-00138-MBC Document 9 Filed 08/23/06 Page 5 of 9Case 1:04-cv-00138-MBC Document 9 Filed 08/23/06 Page 6 of 9Case 1:04-cv-00138-MBC Document 9 Filed 08/23/06 Page 7 of 9Case 1:04-cv-00138-MBC Document 9 Filed 08/23/06 Page 8 of 9Case 1:04-cv-00138-MBC Document 9 Filed 08/23/06 Page 9 of 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
GREAT NORTHERN INSURED ANNUITY CORPORATION FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           5,056
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                              0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                0
<EQUITIES>                                         0
<MORTGAGE>                                     1,204
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 6,623
<CASH>                                             0
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                 0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                            98
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,082
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                6,004
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                    19
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                              0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           3
<OTHER-SE>                                       790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,082
<PREMIUMS>                                        61
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              475
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                20
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     8
<BENEFITS>                                        36
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      (8)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                              42
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  107
<INCOME-TAX>                                      36
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               71
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                      71
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                     0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                  0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                 0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                   0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                    0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                            0
        

</TABLE>
#### CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, Florida, etc., Appellant, v. MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Appellees.

No. 40260.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 15, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 239 So.2d 272.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Richard K. Matros, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sun Healthcare Group,
Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.








Date:
      March 6, 2008
            /s/
      Richard K. MatrosRichard
      K. Matros
              Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

v. 

JASON SCALISE, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER 

Cr. No. 1:07-cr-00052 Erie 

(Civ. No. 12-61 Erie) 

Pending before the Court is Petitioner Jason Scalise's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or 

Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, filed at Criminal No. 07-52 Erie. ECF No. 86. 

An Evidentiary Hearing on the motion was set for Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. The 

parties have filed a joint request to resolve the motion to vacate and to proceed to a sentencing 

hearing. We will grant the request and set a sentencing hearing. Accordingly, the following 

Order is hereby entered. 

AND NOW, to-wit, this ~ w.. 

day of July, 2015, it is hereby ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Joint Request to Resolve Motion to Vacate, Set aside, or 

Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 2255 is GRANTED as follows. 

1. Petitioner's Motion to Vacate Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is GRANTED. 

2. The Judgment of Sentence entered August 6, 2009 is hereby VACATED. 

3. A new Sentencing hearing is hereby set for Thursday, September 17, 2015, at 

10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8A, gth Floor, United States Courthouse, 700 Grant 

Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 

4. The evidentiary hearing set for July 23,22015 is CANCELLED. 

5. The Parties may file a Position with Respect to Sentencing Factors no later than 

August 27, 2015. A party may file a response to the opposing party's Position 

with Respect to Sentencing Factors no later than September 3, 2015. A party may 

file supplemental information or a Sentencing Memorandum no later than 

September 10, 2015. 

114,,~ .. ~ c. eo fdA. ~. Maurice B. Cohill, Jr. 

Senior United States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cr-00052-MBC Document 120 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 1
#### H. R. GARDNER, Appellant, v. Roy M. POOLEY, Jr. and Arlinghouse, Ltd., a Limited Partnership, Appellees.

No. O-41.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 20, 1971.

John Paul Howard, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto, Dean and Hallowes, Jacksonville, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment appealed from is affirmed. See Buchanan v. Miami Herald Publishing Company, Fla., 230 So,2d 9, page 11.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS, J., and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge, concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2159 

To provide for reimbursement of the cost of certain projects at the Fern 

Ridge Dam, Oregon. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 21, 2005 

Mr. SMITH (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To provide for reimbursement of the cost of certain projects 

at the Fern Ridge Dam, Oregon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FERN RIDGE DAM, OREGON. 

4 (a) DEFINITION OF DAM SAFETY PROJECT.—Not5 withstanding any other provision of law (including a regu6 lation), the repairs initiated at Fern Ridge Dam, Oregon, 

7 during fiscal year 2005 shall be considered to be a dam 

8 safety project, as that term is defined by the Chief of En9 gineers. 

10 (b) COSTS OF PROJECTS.— 
2 

•S 2159 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para2 graph (2), the cost of the repairs described in sub3 section (a) shall be reimbursable in accordance with 

4 section 1203 of the Water Resources Development 

5 Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 467n). 

6 (2) EXCEPTION.—The portion of repair costs 

7 allocated to irrigation as a project benefit shall not 

8 be reimbursable. 

Æ
Description of performance bonus arrangement for executive officers for
the year ending December 31, 2001 ("2001"):

The bonus plan for 2001 is based on two components: 1) Return on
Capital and 2) Unit Growth.  Bonuses (if any) are to be calculated and
paid quarterly, based upon stand alone quarterly results.  Potential
bonuses are also to be calculated on full year amounts at year end,
with such year end calculation determined at four times the applicable
quarterly rate, less any interim payments.  No return of a prior bonus
is required if the full year calculation yields less than the sum of
prior quarter payments.

Return on Capital ("ROC") is defined to equal, for the applicable time
period calculated, the product of (a) income from operations before
bonus accruals pursuant to this plan (either for the full year, or
annualized by multiplying quarterly pre-bonus income from operations by
four, as applicable), divided by (b) the sum of (i) average
shareholders' equity and (ii) average funded debt. If ROC is 5% or
greater, the ROC bonus shall be actual ROC for the applicable period
times the employee's full year base salary.

Unit Growth is to equal actual unit volume for the applicable quarterly
or full year period, less actual unit volume for the comparable prior
year period, divided by actual unit volume for the comparable prior
year period.

The Unit Growth component of the applicable employee's bonus shall be
determined as follows:

   If Unit                 the ROC Bonus is at least as follows,
  Growth is      and           then Unit Growth Bonus % is:
--------------		------------------------------------------
                              5%          10%         15%
                             ----        -----       -----
Zero or less                 (1.0)%      (2.0)%      (3.0)%
 0.01% to  9.99%               -           -           -
10.00% to 14.99%              2.5%        5.0%       10.0%
15.00% to 19.99%              5.0%       10.0%       15.0%
20.00% or more               10.0%       15.0%       20.0%

For the executive officers of the Company, the above calculations will
be based on consolidated results for 50% of the quarterly bonus total,
if any, with the other 50% based upon the results of the separate
divisions of the Company.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3222 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3222

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To ensure the security of office space rented by Senators, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SECURITY OF OFFICE SPACE RENTED BY SENATORS.

    Section 3 of the Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1975 (2 
U.S.C. 6317) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (12) as 
                subparagraphs (A) through (L), respectively;
                    (B) by striking ``The aggregate'' and inserting 
                ``(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the aggregate''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) The aggregate square feet of office space for purposes of 
paragraph (1) shall not include any portion of the office space used 
for security or safety enhancements that are--
            ``(A) of a kind authorized by the Committee on Rules and 
        Administration of the Senate, which shall include an 
        information technology security closet and a secure lobby or 
        reception area; and
            ``(B) approved by the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of 
        the Senate.''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(1)--
                    (A) by striking ``The maximum'' and inserting ``(A) 
                Subject to subparagraph (B), the maximum''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(B) The portion of the cost of a rental described in subparagraph 
(A) that is attributable to building security and safety measures shall 
not be included in determining the annual rate paid for the rental for 
purposes of subparagraph (A) if--
            ``(i) the costs are for building security and safety 
        measures--
                    ``(I) of a kind authorized by the Committee on 
                Rules and Administration of the Senate, which shall 
                include guard services, access control, and facility 
                monitoring; and
                    ``(II) approved by the Sergeant at Arms and 
                Doorkeeper of the Senate; and
            ``(ii) such costs are itemized separately in a manner 
        approved by the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the 
        Senate.''.

            Passed the Senate November 2, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 3222

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To ensure the security of office space rented by Senators, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
March 29, 2021 

Policy Statement on Employment and Advancement of 

Persons with Disabilities 

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) is committed to providing fair and equitable 

employment to people with disabilities. As Secretary, I will strive to make the Department a 

model employer of persons with disabilities, especially those with severe disabilities—referred to 

as “targeted disabilities”—by affording them hiring, placement, and advancement opportunities. 

I expect all managers, supervisors, and employees to contribute to making this commitment a 

reality. 

The Department complies with Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 

which prohibits Federal agencies from discriminating against individuals with disabilities. 

Violations of this law will result in swift and appropriate disciplinary actions against the 

offenders, up to and including dismissal. 

The Department will continue to identify and remove barriers to hiring, retaining, and promoting 

persons with disabilities. In accordance with Executive Order 13548, “Increasing Federal 

Employment of Individuals with Disabilities,” and the respective Departmental Plan to Increase 

Employment of People with Disabilities, all departmental organizations will work with their 

Offices of Human Resources in outreach efforts to provide internship, employment, and 

advancement opportunities to persons with disabilities, especially those with targeted disabilities. 

The Department also will ensure that employees and applicants with disabilities have access to 

reasonable accommodations. Guidance on how to handle requests for reasonable 

accommodation by employees and employment applicants is contained in the DOT Order 

entitled “Procedures for Processing Reasonable Accommodation Requests from DOT Job 

Applicants and Employees with Disabilities” (available on the Department’s website at 

https://www.transportation.gov/civil-rights). Additional guidance is available from our 

Departmental Office of Civil Rights. 

Pete Buttigieg
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TC Global,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2009 (the Report), I, Carl W. Pennington, Sr., President (principal
executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/S/    CARL W. PENNINGTON,
SR.         
|Carl W. Pennington, Sr.                
|President (principal executive officer)
|June 29, 2009
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 3

- NM

- 1 40

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)