Page 1 of 40

OKLAHOMA

2021 ANNUAL REPORT

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

Federal Highway Administration 

HIGHWAY SAFETY 

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 

Photo source: Federal Highway Administration
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 2 of 40

Table of Contents

Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................................. 3

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence............................................................. 3

Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4

Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5

Program Structure................................................................................................................................. 5

Program Administration..................................................................................................................... 5

Program Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 6

Project Implementation .......................................................................................................................13

Funds Programmed.........................................................................................................................13

General Listing of Projects ..............................................................................................................15

Safety Performance ............................................................................................................................23

General Highway Safety Trends......................................................................................................23

Safety Performance Targets............................................................................................................28

Applicability of Special Rules...........................................................................................................30

Evaluation ...........................................................................................................................................31

Program Effectiveness ....................................................................................................................31

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements .......................................................31

Project Effectiveness.......................................................................................................................35

Compliance Assessment ....................................................................................................................36

Optional Attachments..........................................................................................................................39

Glossary..............................................................................................................................................40
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 3 of 40

Disclaimer

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or 

data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section[HSIP], shall not be subject to discovery or 

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action 

for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, 

schedules, lists, or other data.

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or 

data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section[HSIP], shall not be subject to discovery or 

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action 

for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, 

schedules, lists, or other data.23 U.S.C. 409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, 

surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning 

the safety enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway 

crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway 

safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall 

not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for 

other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in 

such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.”
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 4 of 40

Executive Summary

In April 2018, Oklahoma updated its Strategic Highway Safety Plan. The following report summarizes 

Oklahoma’s progress in meeting the objectives of that plan. 

The Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) obligated $54.9 million in Highway Safety Improvement 

Program (HSIP) funds for FY2020. HSIP funds were obligated as follows: 41 percent for bridge projects, 21 

percent on signing projects, 7 percent on rumble strips, and 6 percent on Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) 

projects. The remaining funds were obligated for striping, intersection improvements, traffic signals, cable 

barrier, school zones, guardrail replacement, and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) operations.

There are ongoing changes with ODOT's safety program. The Department is currently undergoing a 

reorganization which could impact how internal partners coordinate to identify and prioritize safety projects. 

Another major change is that ODOT is transitioning from Safe-T to Numetric for generating collision data. 

Numetrics is an AASHTOWare product and using Numetrics will give ODOT the ability to interact with 

Numetrics users in other states to help determine solutions to traffic safety problems.
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 5 of 40

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of achieving 

a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 148(h) and 23 CFR 

924.15, States are required to report annually on the progress being made to advance HSIP implementation 

and evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the HSIP Reporting Guidance dated 

December 29, 2016 and consists of five sections: program structure, progress in implementing highway safety 

improvement projects, progress in achieving safety outcomes and performance targets, effectiveness of the 

improvements and compliance assessment.

Program Structure

Program Administration

Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. 

The Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) is the agency primarily responsible for the 

implementation of the HSIP program in Oklahoma. ODOT is responsible for funding and tracking the progress 

of HSIP projects. The Traffic Division oversees the HSIP program and is responsible for preparing this annual

report.

Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? 

 Other-Traffic Engineering Division

How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? 

• Other-Central Office

Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP.

Local and tribal road projects do not currently use HSIP funds. STP funding is available for local and tribal road 

project.

Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) 

Bureaus, Divisions) are involved with HSIP planning.

• Local Aid Programs Office/Division

• Traffic Engineering/Safety

• Other-Rail Programs

Describe coordination with internal partners.

The HSIP funds are distributed between the Traffic Division, Local Government Division, the Rail Programs 

Division, and the eight field districts. The Traffic Division provides field offices with an annual Collision Digest, 

which can be used for selecting optimal safety project locations.

Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning.

• FHWA

• Governors Highway Safety Office
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 6 of 40

• Law Enforcement Agency

• Local Government Agency 

• Regional Planning Organizations (e.g. MPOs, RPOs, COGs)

• Tribal Agency

Describe coordination with external partners.

ODOT confers with the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office annually in establishing performance measure 

targets. Other partners include FHWA, the Department of Public Safety, municipal and tribal law enforcement, 

regional planning organizations, local government agencies, and academia.

Program Methodology

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP.

• Horizontal Curve

• Intersection

• Median Barrier

• Roadway Departure

• Sign Replacement And Improvement

• Other-Striping

Program: Horizontal Curve

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2018

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• Other-Run off road injury/fatal • Traffic

• Lane miles

• Horizontal curvature

• Roadside features

• Other-Speed Limit

• Other-Shoulder width

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Excess expected crash frequency with the EB adjustment

• Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

• Probability of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 7 of 40

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Available funding:2

Cost Effectiveness:1

Program: Intersection

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• Other-Angle crashes

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• selection committee
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 8 of 40

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Other-Crash frequency:1

Program: Median Barrier

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• Other-Crossover • Other-Access Control

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Other-Systemic Approach

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 9 of 40

Rank of Priority Consideration

Other-District Selection:1

Other-Selection Committee :2

Program: Roadway Departure

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• Other-run off road injury/fatal • Traffic

• Lane miles

• Roadside features

• Other-terrain type

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Other-Total number of incidents/facility type

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C:1
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 10 of 40

Program: Sign Replacement And Improvement

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• Other-Safety Infrastructure

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• Other-Age and Condition of 

Signs

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Other-Selection Committee

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Other-Selection Committee:1

Program: Other-Striping

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 11 of 40

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

• Other-Weather 

related/nighttime

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Other-District Selection

• Other-Selection Committee

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

• Other-District Selection

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Other-District Selection:1

Other-Selection Committee:2

What percentage of HSIP funds address systemic improvements?

 3.24

 HSIP funds are used to address which of the following systemic 

improvements? 

• Cable Median Barriers
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 12 of 40

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? 

• Crash data analysis

• Data-driven safety analysis tools (HSM, CMF Clearinghouse, SafetyAnalyst, usRAP)

• Engineering Study

• Road Safety Assessment

• SHSP/Local road safety plan

• Stakeholder input

Does the State HSIP consider connected vehicles and ITS technologies? 

Yes

Describe how the State HSIP considers connected vehicles and ITS technologies. 

Can be considered during the engineering design phase of projects.

Does the State use the Highway Safety Manual to support HSIP efforts?

Yes

Please describe how the State uses the HSM to support HSIP efforts.

ODOT uses crash modification factors to evaluate potential countermeasures for a project. ODOT uses an 

Empirical Bayes predictive method to evaluate potential benefits of projects.
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 13 of 40

Project Implementation

Funds Programmed

Reporting period for HSIP funding.

Federal Fiscal Year

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category.

FUNDING CATEGORY PROGRAMMED OBLIGATED % 

OBLIGATED/PROGRAMMED

HSIP (23 U.S.C. 148) $13,421,465 $54,895,003 409.01%

HRRR Special Rule (23 

U.S.C. 148(g)(1))

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

154)

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

164)

$0 $0 0%

RHCP (for HSIP 

purposes) (23 U.S.C. 

130(e)(2))

$0 $0 0%

Other Federal-aid Funds 

(i.e. STBG, NHPP)

$755,675,079 $686,264,643 90.81%

State and Local Funds $608,124,377 $12,393,432 2.04%

Totals $1,377,220,921 $753,553,078 54.72%

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) or tribal 

safety projects?

0%

How much funding is obligated to local or tribal safety projects?

0%

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$0

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$1,500,000

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas 

during the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

0%
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 14 of 40

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during 

the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

0%

Discuss impediments to obligating HSIP funds and plans to overcome this challenge in 

the future.

Impediment: Having staff with expertise to prioritize projects using up-to-date statistical methods and other 

valid technical criteria.

Plan to Overcome: Hire knowledgeable staff or provide adequate training.
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 15 of 40

General Listing of Projects

List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period.

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

196406 Roadway Roadway - other 2.1 Miles $26155.32 $4497520.32 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 5,500 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects

1496404 Roadway Roadway - other 2.5 Miles $0 $18943842.64 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 25,900 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects

2026611 Roadway Roadway - other 3 Miles $17459620.4 $17459620.4 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 10,000 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects

2313904 Roadway Roadway - other 1.76 Miles $0 $3798818 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,600 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects

2324307 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Miles $137804 $3008186 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 790 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Signing & 

Striping

2370806 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

1 Miles $100199 $224577.3 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Major Collector 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal

2411405 Roadway Roadway - other 3.8 Miles $-216744.65 $1178725.35 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,600 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None RIGHT OF WAY

2413204 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Miles $79375.36 $3741981.16 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,900 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Signing & 

Striping

2414704 Roadway Roadway - other 0.5 Miles $358416.08 $6505480.1 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,500 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects

2436605 Roadway Roadway - other 6.052 Miles $315000 $4308000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Major Collector 3,200 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None RIGHT OF WAY

2555218 Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

Advanced 

technology and 

ITS - other

1 Statewide $950000 $950000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 Spot None ITS 

MAINTENANCE 

& 

OPERATIONS

2590948 Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

Advanced 

technology and 

ITS - other

1 Statewide $0 $3998018 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther11,100 Spot None ITS 

MAINTENANCE 

& 

OPERATIONS
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 16 of 40

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

2649504 Roadway Roadway - other 0.508 Miles $0 $1420318.42 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 890 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects

2703904 Roadway Roadway - other 0.34 Miles $278644.52 $6907275.06 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Major Collector 2,200 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects

2704504 Roadway Roadway - other 0.15 Miles $-142122 $3723133.32 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 490 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects

2707404 Roadway Roadway - other 0.25 Miles $-5712.24 $4315817.76 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,800 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects

2713804 Roadway Roadway - other 0.52 Miles $331504.74 $1601385.83 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,100 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects

2716704 Roadway Roadway - other 0.55 Miles $-53081.41 $3195191.39 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther14,000 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Modification

2792504 Roadway Roadway - other 0.35 Miles $0 $7452542.83 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,000 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects

2799704 Roadway Roadway - other 0.02 Miles $0 $5220224.68 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 5,400 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects

2803204 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Miles $0 $2729379 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,500 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects

2883408 Roadway Roadway - other 1.1 Miles $-176871.41 $1603943.59 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,700 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Modification

2896204 Roadway Roadway - other 0.25 Miles $285179.04 $7786475.79 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,300 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects

2897404 Roadway Roadway - other 0.4 Miles $-101335.49 $2997329.26 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther21,200 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects

2918604 Roadside Barrier – cable 5.2 Miles $161481.37 $571646.37 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate11,600 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

2968904 Roadway Roadway - other 0.77 Miles $4201375.22 $4201375.22 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,200 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge Projects
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 17 of 40

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3078704 Roadside Barrier – cable 14 Miles $0 $3209500 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther17,400 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3093704 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

27.05 Miles $-19570.56 $380429.44 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther17,100 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Signing & 

Striping

3110504 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

45.26 Miles $69494.64 $730241.14 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther22,800 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Signing & 

Striping

3140004 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

74.33 Miles $11481.91 $974437.66 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Minor Arterial 5,000 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3168004 Roadway Roadway - other 1.8 Miles $0 $458905 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,800 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Clear Zone 

Mitigation

3169104 Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

Advanced 

technology and 

ITS - other

1 ITS 

MAINTENANCE 

& 

OPERATIONS

$0 $300000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot None ITS 

MAINTENANCE 

& 

OPERATIONS

3248404 Roadside Barrier- metal 9.11 Miles $-19482.47 $2691241.55 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther16,000 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

GUARDRAIL

3248604 Roadside Barrier – cable 4 Miles $-0.76 $724954.01 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther23,700 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3256304 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

0.54 Miles $566 $34544 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther7,500 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal

3262504 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

36.73 Miles $65002.38 $5462582.93 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate135,900 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety Lane 

Departure

Signing

3262604 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

14.47 Miles $-327347.88 $406434.62 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate93,200 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety Lane 

Departure

Signing

3265904 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

23.2 Miles $0 $445000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther19,300 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 18 of 40

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3266204 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

60.29 Miles $-25219.86 $323780.14 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther7,900 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3266504 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

20.09 Miles $-8372.71 $193627.29 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Major Collector 12,100 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3274504 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1.01 Miles $32598.03 $961307.03 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther6,600 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3274604 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.5 Miles $-198662.11 $549337.89 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 8,500 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3283804 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.5 Miles $599.91 $457188.03 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 10,300 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3283904 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.495 Miles $421544 $421544 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 7,500 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3290504 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1 Miles $10801.74 $250561.74 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,600 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3293404 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1.95 Miles $7977.61 $514421.17 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Major Collector 14,200 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3293504 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.51 Miles $17041.91 $186949.91 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther4,600 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3293804 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.25 Miles $4817.24 $95548.24 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther10,100 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3293904 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.95 Miles $131467.5 $367873.88 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther12,700 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3294004 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.8 Miles $1521.2 $135563.2 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 1,400 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3294704 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.1 Miles $46592.4 $932686.4 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 1,900 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 19 of 40

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3295204 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.6 Miles $63561.31 $591651.31 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Minor Arterial 14,700 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3295304 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1.596 Miles $1252056 $1252056 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther14,600 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3295604 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 4.76 Miles $195674.78 $755950.47 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther7,000 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3295704 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.46 Miles $245751.5 $245751.5 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther4,300 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3296604 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.29 Miles $4363.13 $355613.13 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 2,300 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3296804 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1.6 Miles $500215.39 $500215.39 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther11,800 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3307704 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

0.1 Miles $1915.71 $153657.36 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

23,800 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal

3309504 Roadside Barrier – cable 5 Miles $-89606.74 $1118614.26 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 16,200 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3324904 Roadside Barrier- metal 4.72 Miles $-89149.48 $2195802.52 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,400 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

GUARDRAIL

3325004 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

27.51 Miles $501.45 $364813.45 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther17,700 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3325104 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

0.1 Miles $19477.88 $347524.35 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther8,700 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal

3325404 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

0.1 Miles $944.1 $268366.48 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther15,800 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal

3325504 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

18.31 Miles $10785.74 $361766.22 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate92,000 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 20 of 40

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3330204 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

3.4 Miles $0 $451793.51 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,100 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Curve 

Treatment

3340804 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.14 Miles $155820 $155820 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 1,400 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3341004 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.5 Miles $123838.56 $279516.42 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Minor Arterial 2,100 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3341204 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.25 Miles $309692.86 $309692.86 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 930 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3347804 Roadside Barrier – cable 7.07 Miles $-456571.77 $1664135.02 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther7,200 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3347805 Roadside Barrier – cable 7.28 Miles $1574984.87 $1574984.87 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther6,400 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3347904 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

0.2 Miles $12821.58 $40945.17 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 2,700 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3348004 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

91.62 Miles $-218393.45 $1284376.55 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther4,600 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3360604 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

0.01 Miles $-9760.42 $166856.23 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 12,000 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections Cable Barrier

3370304 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

0.5 Miles $1338.57 $20120.66 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Major Collector 1,300 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3370404 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

46.6 Miles $2102.81 $944502.81 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate17,600 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3381704 Roadside Barrier – cable 7.33 Miles $801401.27 $1001751.59 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 12,700 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3381804 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

1 County $5516246.58 $6895308.21 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 Policy/Safety Lane 

Departure

Signing
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 21 of 40

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3382004 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

1 County $5597510.22 $6996887.76 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 Policy/Safety Lane 

Departure

Signing

3386004 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

1 City $-605502.08 $2848963.52 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 Policy/Safety Lane 

Departure

Signing

3386704 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

1 District $1448730.52 $1698730.52 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 Policy/Safety Lane 

Departure

Signing

3391304 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

247.5 Miles $2077470.15 $2077470.15 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping & 

Centerline 

Rumble Strip

3393104 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

222 Miles $1878947.52 $1878947.52 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping & 

Centerline 

Rumble Strip

3395404 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

492 Miles $3217638.87 $3217638.87 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialInterstate0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Recessed 

Centerline 

Pavement 

Markings

3408904 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Statewide $1500000 $1730055.47 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Major Collector 0 Policy/Safety None Planning

3414104 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

0.03 Miles $712525.22 $890656.52 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther17,200 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal

3414404 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

55.79 Miles $61855.19 $2558147.63 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate39,500 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety Lane 

Departure

Signing

3414904 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

15.3 Miles $121530 $2844367.99 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

153,000 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3420204 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

12.896 Miles $1314061.21 $1314061.21 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

125,700 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3444604 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

204 Miles $1729826.83 $1729826.83 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Major Collector 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 22 of 40

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3445304 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

156.5 Miles $1378658.79 $1378658.79 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Major Collector 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping & 

Rumble Strip

3469504 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

1 Statewide $320000 $320000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 Request None School Zone
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 23 of 40

Safety Performance

General Highway Safety Trends

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the State for the past five 

years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Fatalities 709 678 669 645 687 657 655 640 654

Serious Injuries 3,502 3,072 3,042 2,826 2,788 2,645 2,452 2,225 2,061

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT)

1.480 1.410 1.400 1.352 1.402 1.330 1.442 1.433 1.551

Serious injury rate (per 

HMVMT)

7.340 6.400 6.380 5.923 5.688 5.354 5.397 4.983 4.888

Number non-motorized 

fatalities

73 74 56 74 96 90 80 101 98

Number of nonmotorized serious 

injuries

192 192 183 213 212 198 166 189 184
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 24 of 40

600

620

640

660

680

700

720

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Fatalities 5 Year Rolling Avg.

Annual Fatalities

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.

Annual Serious Injuries
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 25 of 40

1.2

1.25

1.3

1.35

1.4

1.45

1.5

1.55

1.6

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.

Fatality rate (per HMVMT)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 26 of 40

Describe fatality data source.

Other

If Other Please describe

Oklahoma Highway Safety Office

To the maximum extent possible, present this data by functional classification and 

ownership.

Year 2020

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Interstate

45.2 104.4 0.84 1.93

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other

76.6 178.2 1.45 3.37

Rural Minor Arterial 80.6 177.4 2.58 5.64

Rural Minor Collector 2.8 8 1.51 2.7

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Fatalities Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.

Non Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 27 of 40

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Major Collector 135.6 371.8 63.7 181.01

Rural Local Road or 

Street

57.6 197 2.41 8.13

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Interstate

46 150.8 0.84 2.74

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

18.4 96.2 0.59 3.14

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other

70 404.2 1.23 7.11

Urban Minor Arterial 53.6 340.8 1.05 6.69

Urban Minor Collector 0 1.8

Urban Major Collector 18 94.2 17.99 101.33

Urban Local Road or 

Street

50.4 251.8 1.56 7.39
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 28 of 40

Year 2020

Roadways Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

State Highway 

Agency

283 912.8 1.06 3.42

County Highway 

Agency

Town or Township 

Highway Agency

City or Municipal 

Highway Agency

State Park, Forest, or 

Reservation Agency

Local Park, Forest or 

Reservation Agency

Other State Agency

Other Local Agency 222.8 1,116.6 1.42 7.04

Private (Other than 

Railroad)

Railroad

State Toll Authority 138.8 320.4 3.96 9.13

Local Toll Authority

Other Public 

Instrumentality (e.g. 

Airport, School, 

University)

Indian Tribe Nation

Safety Performance Targets

Safety Performance Targets

Calendar Year 2022 Targets *

Number of Fatalities:656.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 29 of 40

This target was set by the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office using an ARIMA model. Currently there is an 

upward trend in fatalities and Oklahoma is therefore unlikely to meet the target of 656 fatalities for 2022.

Number of Serious Injuries:2200.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

This target was set by the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office using an ARIMA model. Serious injuries in 

Oklahoma are on a downward trend, and Oklahoma may meet the target of 2200 serious injuries for 2022.

Fatality Rate:1.440

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

This target was set by the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office using an ARIMA model. The fatality rate in 

Oklahoma is on an increasing trend, and Oklahoma is therefore unlikely to meet the fatality rate target of 1.44 

for 2022. Furthermore, ODOT may change the method of determining AADT in the future, which will cause an 

apparent increase in the fatality rate.

Serious Injury Rate:4.790

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

This target was set by the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office using an ARIMA model. The serious injury rate in 

Oklahoma is currently on a downward trend, and Oklahoma may meet the serious injury rate target of 4.79 for 

2022. ODOT may change the method of determining AADT in the future, which will cause an apparent 

increase in the serious injury rate.

Total Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries:313.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

This target was set by the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office using an ARIMA model. Oklahoma should be able 

to meet to meet the non-motorized fatality and serious injury target of 313 for 2022.

Describe efforts to coordinate with other stakeholders (e.g. MPOs, SHSO) to establish 

safety performance targets. 

Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) collaborates with the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office 

(OHSO) on the setting of performance targets. For the past several years, OHSO has used an ARIMA model 

produced from a local university to set the targets. OHSO and ODOT jointly review the results of the ARIMA 

model before setting the official targets each year.

Does the State want to report additional optional targets? 

No

Describe progress toward meeting the State’s 2020 Safety Performance Targets (based 

on data available at the time of reporting). For each target, include a discussion of any 

reasons for differences in the actual outcomes and targets.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES TARGETS ACTUALS
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 30 of 40

Number of Fatalities 662.0 658.6

Number of Serious Injuries 2465.0 2434.2

Fatality Rate 1.320 1.432

Serious Injury Rate 5.140 5.262

Non-Motorized Fatalities and 

Serious Injuries

281.0 282.8

Oklahoma has met the targets for fatalities and number of serious injuries. The three remaining targets (fatality 

rate, serious injury rate, and non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries) are then compared to their baselines:

Performance Measure Actual Baseline (2014-2018) Actual less than Baseline?

Fatality Rate 1.432 1.385 No

Serious Injury Rate 5.262 5.748 Yes

Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries 282.8 194.4 No

Oklahoma's result for serious injury rate (2014-2018) is less than the baseline, so Oklahoma is making 

satisfactory progress for that category. Oklahoma did not meet the targets or the baseline values for fatality 

rate or number of non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries.

Applicability of Special Rules

Does the HRRR special rule apply to the State for this reporting period? 

No

Provide the number of older driver and pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries 65 

years of age and older for the past seven years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Fatalities

95 83 76 87 94 78 79

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Serious 

Injuries

191 217 225 192 210 166 202

2014-2020 older driver/pedestrian data was provided by OHSO for this year's HSIP report.
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 31 of 40

Evaluation 

Program Effectiveness

How does the State measure effectiveness of the HSIP?

• Change in fatalities and serious injuries

• Increased awareness of safety and data-driven process

Based on the measures of effectiveness selected previously, describe the results of 

the State's program level evaluations.

Fatalities are showing an upward trend, but serious injuries continue to show a significant downward trend. 

Results may have been impacted by unforeseen factors such as covid. 

What other indicators of success does the State use to demonstrate effectiveness and 

success of the Highway Safety Improvement Program?

• # miles improved by HSIP

• Increased awareness of safety and data-driven process

• More systemic programs

• Policy change

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements

Present and describe trends in SHSP emphasis area performance measures.

Year 2020

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted Crash 

Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury 

Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Unsafe - Unrestrained All 344.4 809.6 0.75 1.75

Unsafe - Unsafe Speed All 115.6 411.2 0.25 0.89

Unsafe - Inattentive All 34 181.4 0.07 0.39

Unsafe - BAC .08 or 

Above

All 54.4 0.12

Lane Departure Run-off-road 450 1,218.4 0.98 2.64

Intersection Collisions Intersections 139.4 865 0.3 1.88

Young Drivers All 38.2 171.2 0.08 0.37

CMVs Truck-related 102.2 191.4 0.22 0.41

Native American All 84.75 0.18
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 32 of 40

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted Crash 

Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury 

Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Motorcycles Motorcycle 77.6 285 0.17 0.62

Older Drivers All 81.4 196.2 0.18 0.43

Non-Motorized Pedestrian/Bicycle 91.8 188.4 0.2 0.41
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 33 of 40

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Fatalities

2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020

Number of Fatalities 

5 Year Average

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Serious Injuries

2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020

Number of Serious Injuries 

5 Year Average
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 34 of 40

Native American data is four-year average for 2015-2018. Unsafe BAC numbers are for drivers.

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

Fatality Rate

2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Serious Injury Rate

2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019 2016-2020

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 35 of 40

Project Effectiveness

Provide the following information for previously implemented projects that the State evaluated this reporting period. 
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 36 of 40

Compliance Assessment

What date was the State’s current SHSP approved by the Governor or designated State representative?

 04/27/2018

What are the years being covered by the current SHSP?

From: 2018 To: 2022

When does the State anticipate completing it’s next SHSP update?

 2022

Provide the current status (percent complete) of MIRE fundamental data elements collection efforts using the table below. 

*Based on Functional Classification (MIRE 1.0 Element Number) [MIRE 2.0 Element Number]

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

ROADWAY SEGMENT Segment Identifier 

(12) [12]

100 100 100 100 100 100

Route Number (8) 

[8]

100

Route/Street Name 

(9) [9]

100 100

Federal Aid/Route 

Type (21) [21]

100 100

Rural/Urban 

Designation (20) [20]

100 100 100 100

Surface Type (23) 

[24]

100 100 100 100

Begin Point 

Segment Descriptor 

(10) [10]

100 100 100 100 100 100

End Point Segment 

Descriptor (11) [11]

100 100 100 100 100 100

Segment Length 

(13) [13]

100 100

Direction of 

Inventory (18) [18]

100 100

Functional Class 

(19) [19]

100 100 100 100 100 100
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 37 of 40

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Median Type (54) 

[55]

100 100

Access Control (22) 

[23]

100 100

One/Two Way 

Operations (91) [93]

100 100

Number of Through 

Lanes (31) [32]

100 100 100 100

Average Annual 

Daily Traffic (79) [81]

100 100 100 100

AADT Year (80) [82] 100 100

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4) [4]

100 100 100 100 100 100

INTERSECTION Unique Junction 

Identifier (120) [110]

100 100

Location Identifier 

for Road 1 Crossing 

Point (122) [112]

100 100

Location Identifier 

for Road 2 Crossing 

Point (123) [113]

100 100

Intersection/Junction 

Geometry (126) 

[116]

100 100

Intersection/Junction 

Traffic Control (131) 

[131]

100 5

AADT for Each 

Intersecting Road 

(79) [81]

100 100

AADT Year (80) [82] 100 100

Unique Approach 

Identifier (139) [129]

100 100

INTERCHANGE/RAMP Unique Interchange 

Identifier (178) [168]

100

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

100
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 38 of 40

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (197) [187]

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

Ending Ramp 

Terminal (201) [191]

100

Ramp Length (187) 

[177]

100 100

Roadway Type at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (195) [185]

100

Roadway Type at 

End Ramp Terminal 

(199) [189]

100

Interchange Type 

(182) [172]

100

Ramp AADT (191) 

[181]

100 100

Year of Ramp AADT 

(192) [182]

100 100

Functional Class 

(19) [19]

100

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4) [4]

100 100

Totals (Average Percent Complete): 100.00 94.44 100.00 88.13 100.00 36.36 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00

*Based on Functional Classification (MIRE 1.0 Element Number) [MIRE 2.0 Element Number]

Describe actions the State will take moving forward to meet the requirement to have complete access to the MIRE fundamental data elements on all public roads by September 30, 2026.

The next steps for ODOT with the MIRE data elements will be the completion of the Traffic Control data for Non-Local, Non-State-Owned Intersections. This will be facilitated using ODOT personnel and publicly available imagery to work 

from the top down in terms of road size and Traffic Control Type. This will also help finish out the Non-Local, Non-State-Owned Interchanges. ODOT is on track to meet the 2026 deadline. ODOT has worked with FHWA and a consultant 

about differences between ODOT's descriptions on data items and the MIRE elements so that ODOT will be better able to compare it's data to the MIRE elements. This will also help ODOT determine what gaps might be present. 
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 39 of 40

Optional Attachments

Program Structure:

Project Implementation:

Copy of 2021 project listing template2.xlsm

Safety Performance:

Evaluation:

Compliance Assessment:
2021 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 40 of 40

Glossary

5 year rolling average: means the average of five individuals, consecutive annual points of data 

(e.g. annual fatality rate).

Emphasis area: means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process.

Highway safety improvement project: means strategies, activities and projects on a public road 

that are consistent with a State strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous 

road location or feature or addresses a highway safety problem.

HMVMT: means hundred million vehicle miles traveled.

Non-infrastructure projects: are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of noninfrastructure projects include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, 

improvements in the collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement 

activities.

Older driver special rule: applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and 

pedestrians over the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which 

data are available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance 

dated February 13, 2013.

Performance measure: means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to 

monitor changes in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and 

objectives.

Programmed funds: mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects.

Roadway Functional Classification: means the process by which streets and highways are 

grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP): means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on 

safety data developed by a State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148.

Systematic: refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across 

a system.

Systemic safety improvement: means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high 

risk roadway features that are correlated with specific severe crash types.

Transfer: means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal 

year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.