alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 10393 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
GEORGE HENRY PURDY , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16

- CR

- 196

- 1

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and H O, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent George Henry Purdy has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Purdy h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 20 , 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-10393 Document: 00514353369 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/20/2018No. 17

- 10393

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GR ANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-10393 Document: 00514353369 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/20/2018
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MANSOUR W. SAIKALY, 

Petitioner, 

v. C.A. No. 06-73 Erie 

1 District Judge McLaughlin JAMES SHERMAN, 1 Magistrate Judge Baxter 

Respondent ) 

ORDER 

On March 23,2006, Petitioner, a federal prisoner appearingpro se, filed the instant 

petition for writ of habeas corpus. This matter was assigned to United States District Judge 

Sean J. McLaughlin and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter 

for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. 5 636(b)(1), 

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

On May 30,2006, Magistrate Judge Baxter issued a Report and Recommendation 

recommending that this case be dismissed due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Document # 

7. 

No objections have been filed. However, Petitioner filed a motion to transfer the case to 

the Eastern District of California on June 15,2006. 

AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2006; 

Following a de novo review of the record in this case, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate 

Judge Baxter on May 22,2006 is adopted as the opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER 

Case 1:06-cv-00073-SJM-SPB Document 9 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED that the Clerk of Courts close this case. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to transfer [Document # 81 is 

dismissed as moot. Petitioner may choose to refile his petition for writ of habeas corpus in the 

district court in which he is incarcerated. 

S1 Sean J. McLauahlin 

SEAN J. MCLAUGHLIN 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:06-cv-00073-SJM-SPB Document 9 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40864

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

AURELIO REYES-NAVARRO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-611-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Aurelio ReyesNavarro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Reyes-Navarro has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 27, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40864 Document: 00513927032 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2017
No. 16-40864

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40864 Document: 00513927032 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/27/2017
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of National Golf Properties, Inc. on Form S-8 (and related prospectus) (File
No. 33-67350), of our report dated March 4, 1997, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of National
Golf Properties, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
                                          COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
Los Angeles, California
March 4, 1997
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, David Hills, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



Date: May 10, 2005By:

/s/ David B. HillsName:

David B. HillsTitle:

Chief Executive Officer




I, William B. Lonergan, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of LookSmart, Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of LookSmart, Ltd.



Date: May 10, 2005By:

/s/ William B. LonerganName:

William B. LonerganTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




40
EXHIBIT 32.2

Section 1350 Certification

I, Mark E. Lemma, the chief financial officer of ALCiS Health, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the Company), certify pursuant to section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge:

(i)
the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: June 29, 2006



|                 
|-----------------
|/s/ Mark E. Lemma
|Mark E. Lemma    



---

|* | The material contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



71
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26756]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT98-1-000]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed 
Changes In FERC Gas Tariff

October 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 1, 1997, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised 
tariff sheets to become effective October 1, 1997:

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 776
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 777
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 825
Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 827
Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 829
Seventeenth Revised Sheet No. 831
Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 832
Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 833

    Williston Basin states that the revised tariff sheets are being 
filed simply to update its Master Receipt/Delivery Point List.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26756 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Lee BROOK, Appellant, v. Margott BROOK, Appellee.

No. 69-754.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 16, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
in connection with the filing of the form 10-K of Shiloh Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended October 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned officers of the Company certifies, that, to such officers knowledge:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dated:  January 24, 2003





/s/    THEODORE K.
ZAMPETISTheodore K. Zampetis President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  January 24, 2003





/s/    STEPHEN E.
GRAHAMStephen E. Graham Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SEAN DURRANT, :

:

Petitioner :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-14-1099

:

SUPERINTENDENT BICKELL, : (Judge Brann)

:

Respondent :

ORDER

December 7, 2015

In accordance with the Memorandum, previously docketed as

separate record documenter no. 28, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Durrant’s habeas corpus petition is DENIED. 

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

3. Based on the Court’s conclusion herein, there is no basis

for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

 s/Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

1

Case 4:14-cv-01099-MWB-JVW Document 29 Filed 12/07/15 Page 1 of 1
No. 00-7112.

#### Padilla *v.*Dorsey, Warden, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GREAT
NORTHERN INSURED ANNUITY CORPORATION FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                             4,732
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                       1,045
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                   6,073
<CASH>                                               0
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                              90
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,412
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  5,356
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                      11
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                         869
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,412
<PREMIUMS>                                          18
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                442
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   9
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       8
<BENEFITS>                                         308
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                         19
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     99
<INCOME-TAX>                                        32
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 67
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        67
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        




</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DARYL LUDY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 06-74 Erie

v. )

)

JAMES F. SHERMAN, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on Mrch 23, 2006, and

was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and

recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and

Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

 The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 14], filed on July

19, 2006, recommended that Plaintiff’s application for emergency restraining order,

included as part of his Complaint [Doc. No. 5] be denied. The parties were allowed ten

(10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by

certified mail and on Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the

application and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation,

the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 16th day of August, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s application for emergency

restraining order included as part of his Complaint is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 14] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on July 19, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:06-cv-00074-SJM-SPB Document 15 Filed 08/16/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     THE BALANCE SHEETS AND INCOME STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
     ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.     
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         758
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               758
<PP&E>                                         21,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                 575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 22,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,188
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,666
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   22,898
<SALES>                                        4,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,855
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               411
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (309)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (309)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (309)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.29)
        


 
</TABLE>
THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20590 

January 22, 2020 

Policy Statement on Employment and Advancement of 

Persons with Disabilities 

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) is committed to enhancing access to employment 

of people with disabilities by ensuring equal employment opportunity. I encourage effective 

outreach, recruitment, selection, and advancement of qualified people with disabilities. I am 

committed to making DOT a model employer of persons with disabilities, especially those with 

severe disabilities referred to as “targeted disabilities.” 

The DOT will comply with Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, which 

prohibits Federal agencies from discriminating against qualified individuals with disabilities. 

The DOT will provide hiring, placement, and advancement opportunities for persons with 

disabilities. Violations of this law will result in appropriate disciplinary actions against the 

offenders, up to and including dismissal. 

The DOT will continue to identify and remove barriers to hiring, retaining, and promoting 

persons with disabilities. In accordance with Executive Order 13548 “Increasing Federal 

Employment of Individuals with Disabilities,” and the respective DOT Plan to Increase 

Employment of People with Disabilities, all departmental organizations will work with their 

Offices of Human Resources in outreach efforts to provide internship, employment, and 

advancement opportunities to persons with disabilities, especially those with targeted disabilities. 

The DOT will provide a work environment that welcomes qualified individuals with disabilities 

and effectively uses their skills, knowledge, and abilities. Each of us has a role in identifying, 

reporting and eliminating barriers to the employment ofpeople with disabilities. Guidance on 

how to handle requests for reasonable accommodation by employees and employment applicants 

is contained in DOT Order 1011.1 A, “Procedures for Processing Reasonable Accommodation 

Requests from DOT Job Applicants and Employees with Disabilities” (available on the 

Department’s Web site at https://www.transportation.gov/civil-rights). 

Please join me in ensuring equal employment opportunities for people with disabilities. 

Together, we can make DOT a model employer and a better workplace for all. 

Elaine L. Chao
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26201]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Certification on Conversion of Military Positions to Civilian 
Positions

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel 
and Readiness.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is being published in accordance with the National 
Defense Authorization Act for FY 1997. This Act requires that the 
Department of Defense provide notification upon its certification to 
Congress that 3,000 military positions were converted to civilian 
positions during FY 1996. The Certification was submitted to the 
Congress on September 22, 1997. Further details concerning the 
conversion may be obtained by contacting the Office of the Director, 
Requirements, Department of Defense.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John Davey, 703-614-5133.


    Dated: September 29, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-26201 Filed 10-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M