Page 1 of 59

LOUISIANA

2019 ANNUAL REPORT
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 2 of 59

Table of Contents

Table of Contents.................................................................................................................................. 2

Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................................. 3

Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4

Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 9

Program Structure................................................................................................................................. 9

Program Administration..................................................................................................................... 9

Program Methodology .....................................................................................................................11

Project Implementation .......................................................................................................................17

Funds Programmed.........................................................................................................................17

General Listing of Projects ..............................................................................................................19

Safety Performance ............................................................................................................................39

General Highway Safety Trends......................................................................................................39

Safety Performance Targets............................................................................................................44

Applicability of Special Rules...........................................................................................................49

Evaluation ...........................................................................................................................................50

Program Effectiveness ....................................................................................................................50

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements .......................................................50

Project Effectiveness.......................................................................................................................54

Compliance Assessment.....................................................................................................................55
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 3 of 59

Disclaimer

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section[HSIP], shall not be subject 

to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other 

purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed 

in the reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or other data.”

23 U.S.C. 409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, 

or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety 

enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway 

crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any 

highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid 

highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court 

proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence 

at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.”
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 4 of 59

Executive Summary

Louisiana has set an aggressive target for reducing death and injury on the roadways –Destination Zero 

Deaths. Great progress has been made since the development and implementation of the 2006 Strategic 

Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) and its subsequent update in October, 2011 and July, 2017. The 2017 SHSP 

targets five emphasis areas: impaired driving, occupant protection, infrastructure and operations, crashes 

involving young drivers and distracted driving. Since 2007, traffic fatalities have dropped from 993 to as low as 

677 in 2011 and serious injuries were reduced from 1830 in 2008 to 1262 in 2018. In 2017, 771 people died on 

Louisiana’s highways and approximately 1300 people were seriously injured. Although preliminary, Louisiana 

is showing no increase or decrease in fatalities for 2018 at 771. Louisiana remains below our SHSP target of 

reducing fatalities in half by 2030.

Louisiana has accomplished a number of successes in each emphasis area including the following:

Infrastructure and Operations 

Data and analysis improvements: State-specific safety performance functions (SPFs) for intersection network 

screening have been developed and state specific SPF for segments are being used for network screening on 

state routes. The goal is to institutionalize the use of the network screening results and share this information 

with the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) and other programs at LADOTD for further integration of 

quantitative safety in the planning process. In addition, we have conducted various safety analysis training 

sessions for engineers and planners statewide. The training sessions primarily focused on how to conduct a 

comprehensive project level crash data analysis using LADOTD’s internal excel-based Crash Analysis Tool 

(CAT Scan) using state specific SPFs.

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Project Selection Guide outlines the criteria that is used to 

select and prioritize all HSIP infrastructure projects on state routes. Similar guides have been provided for 

Local Road Safety Program and Safe Routes to Public Places Program projects. Also for evaluation of the 

SHSP, web-based data dashboards have been updated for safety stakeholders and regional safety coalitions 

to assess progress ( http://datareports.lsu.edu/shsps.aspx ) and use in conjunction with SHSP action plans.

Also, in coordination with the Local Technical Assistance Program (LTAP), we continue to use the crash data 

profiles for the top 20 parishes. These crash data profiles include local road crash data by jurisdiction and help 

inform Regional Safety Coalition Infrastructure and Operations Teams on highest safety priorities for a parish 

based on location. This also has influences the LRSP project identification process to be more data driven.

We are continuing to work with the Regional Safety Coalition SHSP Infrastructure and Operations teams to 

develop district-wide (state owned routes) and/or parish-wide (locally owned routes) safety plans to identify the 

highest priority sites with the largest safety potential for HSIP funding on state and locally owned routes. We 

are also funding the MPOs through the safety coalitions contracts to develop the parish-wide local road safety 

plans for the top 20 parishes. 

We have completed the first phase of the local road contract to collect video and the MIRE FDE's on all locally 

owned public roads. The State is collaborating with locals to fill in the remainder of the local roads that were 

missed as part of the original contract. The State has collected approximately 99% (90% of FDE are 

completed) of all the local public roads statewide. The State system has been loaded into the enterprise 

system and is working through LRS issues with the local system. Many of these data elements combined with 

crash data are being used by a FHWA team to develop a LADOTD Roadway Departure Implementation Plan 

to identify potential high priority routes/corridors for future HSIP projects. This project was requested as part of 

the FHWA Focused Approach for Roadway Departure.

We hosted a safety data integration peer exchange in April 2018 to discuss opportunities to integrate our 

roadway and crash data for advancing our HSIP. One significant outcome of this was a pilot project with 
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 5 of 59

Acadiana MPO to develop a data integration plan that could be used as a framework for all local entities who 

would like to obtain and utilize LADOTD roadway data for state and locally owned roads.

In addition, LADOTD has established a data governance committee and is in the process of hiring a consultant 

to implement a governance structure for more informative collaboration among various sections and agencies 

who are using our roadway data. As part of data governance related to roadway data, the State has developed 

a data dictionary that applies to all public roads. So when we collect data on local roads it will comply with the 

data dictionary. MIRE FDE's and additional elements, are documented in the data dictionary.

The major partners of the SHSP (LSP, LHSC and DOTD) work closely with Traffic Records Coordinating 

Committee to update the crash report manual to include new definitions for coding injuries using the KABCO 

scale. The major motivation for this was to make our data more consistent statewide and to be more aligned 

with national standards. The next phase of this project will include updating the actual crash report form itself. 

As a follow up of the Data Driven Safety Analysis EDC and DDSA peer exchange in July 2018, LADOTD and 

FHWA have worked together to update the 2011 HSM Implementation Plan to be a DDSA Implementation 

Plan with the purpose of including more safety analyses in the overall LADOTD project delivery process. Next 

steps include establishing a DDSA Task Force with all LADOTD sections represented so they can finalize the 

action plan and carry it forward.

Systemic safety improvements:

We are continuing to implement cable barrier projects statewide based on a statewide systemic cable median 

barrier study which produced a prioritized list of candidate locations where median barrier would be considered 

for installation. High speed, controlled access facilities with a median width less than 100' were analyzed in the 

study.

As of June 2019, the LADOTD has installed approximately 355 miles of cable barriers throughout the State at 

an investment of approximately $52 million. There are currently another 239 miles under construction along I10, I-55, I-59 and I-49 corridors for approximately $35 million.

We are also continuing to implement districtwide low cost safety improvement projects targeted at curves for 

roadway departure. The state is updating the specification on High Friction Surface Treatment again to provide 

the best possible application and road treatment possible for our motorists. LADOTD Highway Safety Office 

and Traffic Office have partnered together to fund enhanced signing at curves on rural two-lane roads. We 

anticipate having this complete for MUTCD deadline. We are working with LTAP for a similar initiative on local 

roads in conjunction with rural roadway departure EDC. 

Non-Motorized Users

As part of EDC 5, safe transportation for every pedestrian (STEP), LA DOTD is leading a project with 

LSU/HSRG to analyze non-motorized user crashes for the last 5 years. Additional crash data elements not 

currently captured on the crash report are being complied based on narrative and diagram. We anticipate this 

crash data assessment will give us more insight into trends and patterns statewide. This will also help us focus 

our safety funds and determine which countermeasure we should target and where we should focus training. 

LADOTD prepared the annual statewide Complete Streets Performance Measures Report and developed a 

draft Complete Streets Implementation Plan. Safety considerations have been used for these efforts to help 

bring awareness to potential concerns and identify opportunities where improvements can be made on new 

projects.

Under the FHWA Focused Approach for Pedestrians and Bicyclists, LADOTD is managing a Bicycle and 

Pedestrian Safety Action Plan and Masterplan for the City of Baton Rouge – Parish of East Baton Rouge. This 

plan will prioritize locations for safety improvements as part of a larger recommended network for the entire 

City-Parish.
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 6 of 59

Occupant Protection

The State of Louisiana’s statewide seat belt use rate for 2018 is 86.9%. The 2018 survey was conducted midyear, like most statewide surveys in years past. The statewide use rate fell short of the historic high measured 

in December 2016 (87.8%), but the difference is not statistically significant. The 2018 rate was also higher 

compared to the next most recent June survey, in 2015, which yielded an 85.9% usage rate, and the difference 

between those two years was also not statistically significant. The proportion of pickup truck occupants in the 

2018 survey is similar compared to previous June statewide surveys (2012-2015 and 2017). Interestingly, 

there was a smaller proportion of pickup truck occupants compared to the previous year’s sample, conducted 

December 2016. Lower usage among pickup truck occupants has a downward pull on the overall statewide 

rate. In other words, when there are more pickup truck occupants in the sample, there is likely more of a 

downward pull on the overall use rate and when there are fewer there is less of a pull downward. The 

December 2016 survey had fewer pickup trucks and less of a pull. It is also worth noting that lower usage 

among Black occupants is much improved now compared to recent years. The gap between Black and White 

occupant belt use has shrunk from 10.0 percentage points in 2015 to only 4.0 points in 2018.Overall seat belt 

use in Louisiana generally shows an upward trend, increasing 12.4 percentage points since 2009 when only 

three-in-four were observed wearing a seat belt (74.5%). Every region in the State of Louisiana has 

experienced improvement in seat belt usage since 2010. Comparing 2010 to 2018, the Lake Charles region 

had a large increase of 17.2 percentage points, followed by Lafayette region with an increase of 15.4 

percentage points. The Shreveport and Alexandria region had the smallest increases with 4.8 and 6.3 

percentage points, respectively. For the fourth year, all regions of Louisiana had a seatbelt use rate above 80

percent. In 2018, all but two regions were above 85%. Education and outreach activities were conducted by 

University Medical Center, ThinkFirst of Ark-La-Tex, Louisiana Passenger Safety Task Force, YMCA of New 

Orleans, Ready, Set, Drive, BRAKES Program, and Rock the Belt. LHSC provided overtime enforcement 

funding to 46 local police departments and sheriff's offices along with Louisiana State Police.

Young Drivers

Through the Young Driver SHSP Emphasis Area Team, LADOTD is partnering with Office of Motor Vehicles 

(OMV), Louisiana State Police (LSP) and LHSC to revise the State's 30-hour novice driver education 

curriculum and to deliver a complete comprehensive curriculum, with lesson plans, to the State. Sudden 

Impact Program (comprehensive injury prevention program targeting adolescents) reached just over 17,878 

students. Think First Program coordinated and implemented 74 traffic safety programs reaching a total of 

6,124 people: 4,535 students and 1,589 adults in the 2018 calendar year. 

Impaired Driving

LADOTD and LHSC collaborated to revise the 2019 Statewide Impaired Driving Plan for 405d Funds. The plan 

is required in order to receive federal funding. The plan was approved by the SHSP Impaired Driving Emphasis 

Area Team on May 9, 2018 and submitted to NHTSA in June 2018. DWI overtime enforcement was 

implemented in Tier One Alcohol Problem ID Parishes corresponding with national and state mobilizations. 

There are a total of eight DWI courts serving clients in twelve parishes throughout the state. No Refusal 

Programs are expanding across the state at this time. An additional 28 law enforcement officers were trained 

as Drug Recognition Experts, and the state launched its first Judicial Outreach Liaison program. 

In 2018, Governor John Bel Edwards reestablished the Governor's Task Force on DWI within the Office of 

Drug Policy. LADOTD and LHSC as well as SHSP Impaired Driving Team Leader serve on the task force and 

have presented on the SHSP and SHSP Impaired Driving Action plan.

SHSP Implementation & Update

Louisiana is using a two-tiered approach to implement the SHSP: Statewide Emphasis Area Teams create 

data-driven action plans and track implementation of SHSP strategies and action steps, and regional Safety 

Coalitions utilize data to identify regional safety needs and develop data-driven five-year regional safety plans 

which identify emphasis areas consistent with the SHSP. 

In 2018, a new vision for future state and regional action plans was developed to provide the following: 
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 7 of 59

• Provide enriched standardization and clarity 

• Deliver clear interpretation of data, strategies, actions 

• Create data and documentation portal 

• Promote parallel accountability between state and regions 

• Enhance distinct performance and attainment metrics 

• Improve transparency of action effectiveness tool 

• Intensify data driven annual comparison method 

• Develop and map action plan adjustment process 

• Prevent duplication of efforts 

LADOTD collaborated with federal, state, regional, and/or local representatives in the development of new 

program content relating to the performance, quality and compliance monitoring of action plans, projects and/or 

processes that will further enhance and support the engagement, effectiveness, tracking, goals and objectives 

of the SHSP and its associated operative platforms. Strategies were determined, outcomes were defined, 

performance indicators were identified and action plans were developed. Quarterly and annual reviews are 

conducted at the statewide and regional levels to evaluate attainment, ensure action plans are data driven and 

are enhancing effectiveness of overall goal achievement.

LADOTD and LSU/HSRG have developed HSIP performance measure dashboards to assist MPOs with 

annual target setting. This has been an effective visualization tool for MPOs/Regional Safety Coalitions as they 

discuss safety with technical committees in their regions. 

The SHSP Implementation Team oversees overall implementation of the Plan and is supported by an 

Executive Committee. The team consists of representatives from the Louisiana Department of Transportation 

and Development (LADOTD), Louisiana State Police (LSP), Louisiana Highway Safety Commission (LHSC), 

Local Technical Assistance Program (LTAP), Louisiana Planning Council (LPC), Louisiana Municipal 

Association (LMA), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 

(FMCSA), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), in addition to the statewide emphasis area 

team leaders and regional safety coalition coordinators.

Regional Highway Safety Coalitions

Through a partnership with Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO), we established nine regional 

transportation safety coalitions across the State. Led by safety coalition coordinators housed within each of the 

MPOs and championed by leaders from a range of agencies and organizations, each coalition comprises local 

experts and advocates working toward the development and implementation of regional safety plans based on 

the SHSP. This regional, grassroots, 4E approach (engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency 

response) to saving lives has proven to be highly effective.

The Louisiana two-tiered approach to lowering fatalities and serious injuries is accomplished in part by 

developing and continually implementing the federally required SHSP. Each region is charged with forming a 

multidisciplinary or 4E safety coalition, reviewing the regional and local crash data, and developing a 

continually evolving, data driven action plan that is linked to the SHSP. All nine Regional Safety Coalitions 

have adopted and are in the process of implementing regional safety action plans.

Local Road Safety Program

The Local Road Safety Program (LRSP) is allocated approximately $3-5 million per year. Eligible projects 

include those for roadways in transportation systems owned and operated by Parish and municipal road 

agencies. Specific funds are available for selected local safety data-driven projects and additional funding 

sources for resources may be available depending on the type of project. Funding for local road safety 

improvement projects is available through the LRSP.

LADOTD administers the LRSP in coordination with LTAP. LTAP coordinates activities and resources in 

conjunction with the LADOTD to facilitate quarterly project submittals, review and scoring, and 

recommendation of qualifying project applications for the Local Road Safety Improvement projects. LTAP 
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 8 of 59

delivered crash data workshops to better inform the data driven process using crash data profiles. LTAP also 

worked with the Regional Safety Coordinators to begin developing Local Road Safety Plans in at least one 

parish per Coalition. Additionally, LADOTD and LTAP participated in Local Road Safety Peer Exchanges in 

September 2018 and May 2019.

Safe Routes to Public Places Program

The Safe Routes to Public Places Program (SRTPPP) is allocated approximately $3-5 million per year as part 

of the HSIP. Eligible projects include those roadways in transportation systems owned and operated State, 

Parish and municipal road agencies. Specific funds are available for selected safety data-driven projects and 

additional funding sources for resources may be available depending on the type of project. Funding for these 

projects is available through the SRTPPP.

LADOTD administers the SRTPPP. LADOTD coordinates activities and resources to facilitate yearly project 

application submittals, review and scoring, and recommendation of qualifying project applications. Due to an 

anticipated lack of resources to manage and deliver new projects, a call for projects was not held between July 

2018 and June 2019. LADOTD plans to conduct a call for projects in 2020 as additional resources become 

available.
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 9 of 59

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of 

achieving a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 

148(h) and 23 CFR 924.15, States are required to report annually on the progress being made to 

advance HSIP implementation and evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the 

HSIP Reporting Guidance dated December 29, 2016 and consists of five sections: program structure, 

progress in implementing highway safety improvement projects, progress in achieving safety 

outcomes and performance targets, effectiveness of the improvements and compliance assessment.

Program Structure

Program Administration

Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. 

Projects that are identified through the Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP) have the overall goal of 

reducing the number and severity of crashes and decreasing the potential for crashes on all public roads.

LA DOTD performs HSIP components of planning, implementation, and evaluation to accomplish requirements 

of the program. These components involve the following: data-driven identification of crash locations, 

development and implementation of an annual program of projects and report annually to the Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA) on progress and effectiveness. FHWA is involved in all three components, both 

formally and through informal technical assistance.

LADOTD has developed Safe Routes to Public Places Program Guidelines, Local Road Safety Program 

Guidelines and Highway Safety Improvement Program Infrastructure Project Selection Guide for State Routes. 

Please see the attached documents that explain how HSIP projects are identified, selected, designed, 

implemented and evaluated.

Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? 

 Planning

How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? 

• Central Office via Statewide Competitive Application Process

• SHSP Emphasis Area Data 

Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP. 

LRSP is allocated approximately $3-5 million per year. Eligible projects include those for roadways in 

transportation systems owned and operated by Parish and municipal road agencies. Specific funds are 

available for selected local safety data-driven projects and additional funding sources for resources may be 

available depending on the type of project. Funding for local road safety improvement projects is available 

through the LRSP.

LADOTD administers the LRSP in coordination with LTAP. LTAP coordinates activities and resources in 

conjunction with the LADOTD to facilitate quarterly project submittals, review and scoring, and 
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 10 of 59

recommendation of qualifying project applications for the Local Road Safety Improvement projects. LTAP 

delivered crash data workshops to better inform the data driven process. LTAP also worked with the Regional 

Safety Coordinators to begin developing Local Road Safety Plans in at least one parish per Coalition. 

Additionally, LADOTD and LTAP participated in Local Road Safety Peer Exchanges in September 2018 and 

May 2019.

Safe Routes to Public Places Program

The SRTPPP is allocated approximately $3-5 million per year. Eligible projects include those roadways in 

transportation systems owned and operated State, Parish and municipal road agencies. Specific funds are 

available for selected safety data-driven projects and additional funding sources for resources may be 

available depending on the type of project. Funding for these projects is available through the SRTPPP.

LADOTD administers the SRTPPP. LADOTD coordinates activities and resources to facilitate yearly project 

application submittals, review and scoring, and recommendation of qualifying project applications. Due to an 

anticipated lack of resources to manage and deliver projects a call for projects was not held between July 2018 

and June 2019.

Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) 

Bureaus, Divisions) are involved with HSIP planning. 

• Design

• Districts/Regions

• Operations

• Planning

• Traffic Engineering/Safety

Describe coordination with internal partners. 

Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LA DOTD) Design assists with Highway Safety 

Improvement Program (HSIP) by providing quality reviews of scope, budgets, and design alternatives 

considered during feasibility stage as needed. LA DOTD Districts perform an annual review of High Potential 

Safety Improvement List (HPSI List) and prioritizes potential safety projects within each district. Once locations 

are identified, they perform crash data analysis to select appropriate countermeasures and prepare scope and 

budget for proposed alternatives, including economic evaluation. LA DOTD Planning unit assists with feasibility 

studies which in turn provides guidance as to whether or not a project is a good fit for the safety program. LA 

DOTD Traffic Engineering unit provide input and feedback regarding safety intersection improvements such as 

traffic signals and roundabouts. LA DOTD Operations guidance and feedback is sought when a statewide, 

systemic approach has been identified as a safety improvement and will require long-term commitment to 

maintain (guardrail upgrades, cable barrier, etc.).

Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning. 

• Academia/University

• FHWA

• Governors Highway Safety Office

• Law Enforcement Agency

• Local Government Agency 

• Local Technical Assistance Program

• Regional Planning Organizations (e.g. MPOs, RPOs, COGs)

• Other-State Police
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 11 of 59

Describe coordination with external partners. 

About 25 percent of roadway deaths and 40 percent of all crashes in Louisiana occur on the local road system. 

Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LA DOTD) partnered with the Louisiana Local 

Technical Assistance Program (LTAP) to manage the Local Road Safety Program (LRSP) to provide training, 

technical assistance, and outreach to local jurisdictions through an application process.

The Louisiana Highway Safety Commission (LHSC) is actively involved in the development of the SHSP 

particularly the emphasis area plans. As such, the projects and activities funded by the Highway Safety Plan 

(HSP) are reflected in these emphasis area action plans. The second goal in Louisiana’s Statewide 

Transportation Plan (STP) is coordinated with the HSIP and SHSP to provide safe and secure travel conditions 

across all transportation modes through physical infrastructure improvements, operational controls, programs, 

and public education and awareness. One of the ways to achieve this goal is through the objective of reducing 

the number and rate of highway-related crashes, fatalities, and serious injuries, which corresponds to the 

performance targets for the HSIP and HSP and the measurable objectives in the Strategic Highway Safety 

Plan (SHSP). A review of the Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan (CVSP) found several areas that link to the 

SHSP including removing alcohol- and drug-impaired commercial vehicle operators from the road and 

outreach and education on seat belt use.

LA DOTD works closely with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) division office on statewide and regional 

initiatives related to SHSP strategies and HSIP, in particular those related to safety data and planning and 

HSIP infrastructure projects. LA DOTD has also been in contact with one of the state’s tribes. We met earlier in 

the year to discuss our process. After the initial meeting, LA DOTD worked along with the local parish to further 

review and analyze data in this area with the expectations that projects may be developed in the future.

Local and state law enforcement agencies actively participate in the statewide SHSP emphasis area teams 

and the regional safety coalitions. Their involvement is critical as SHSP strategies are initiated and achieved at 

the regional level. Their participation is also key for statewide safety initiatives/campaigns. In addition, the law 

enforcement agencies participate in the Road Safety Audits.

LA DOTD also employs a law enforcement liaison to assist with trainings and outreach to the various law 

enforcement agencies statewide to increase the quality of data. Additional duties include Traffic Incident 

Management and Work Zone law enforcement training. 

Regional Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) are actively engaged within the regional safety coalitions. 

Each MPO employs a safety coalition coordinator to oversee the activities of each coalition. The planning 

organizations also work with the LA DOTD planners to use safety and roadway data for their internal analyses 

and assist with their internal prioritization of projects. Many of the MPOs have committed to developing local 

road safety plans at parish level and reaching out to local entities to discuss potential opportunities for 

addressing safety concerns.

The Highway Safety Research Group (HSRG) at Louisiana State University (LSU) provides assistance to LA 

DOTD for fatal Accident Reporting System, crash report software development and training, data quality 

reviews, and real-time reporting tools for stakeholders. HSRG also conducts specialized crash data analysis 

studies as requested by LHSC, LA DOTD, or Louisiana State Police (LSP).

Program Methodology

Does the State have an HSIP manual or similar that clearly describes HSIP planning, 

implementation and evaluation processes? 

Yes
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 12 of 59

FileName:

13.docx

2016_LRSP App_ Jan.pdf

2018 Safe Routes to Public Places Program Evaluation and Selection Policy.pdf

2018 Safe Routes to Public Places Program Guidelines.pdf

2018 SRTPPP Project Application Evaluation Form HSIPPEN.xlsx

LRSP 2018 Application Evaluation Form.xlsx

LRSP 2018 Guidelines & Policies.docx

FINAL_REVISED_HSIP Infrastructure State Routes Project Selection Guide v17_REV.pdf

2018 SRTPPP Application.docx

LRSP_2018_Project_Application.docx

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP. 

• HRRR

• HSIP (no subprograms)

• Local Safety

• Other-Safe Routes to Public Places

Program: HRRR

Date of Program Methodology:7/31/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• FHWA focused approach to safety

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Volume Functional classification 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash rate

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Other-Identified through Planning
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 13 of 59

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Available funding:1

Program: HSIP (no subprograms)

Date of Program Methodology:6/30/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

• FHWA focused approach to safety

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Volume Functional classification 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Crash rate

• Excess expected crash frequency using SPFs

• Excess expected crash frequency with the EB adjustment

• Excess proportions of specific crash types

• Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

• Level of service of safety (LOSS)

• Probability of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• selection committee
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 14 of 59

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Rank of Priority Consideration 

Available funding:2

Cost Effectiveness:1

Program: Local Safety

Date of Program Methodology:12/20/2016

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

• Other-Allows LA DOTD to address crashes on all public roads.

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

No

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program. 

Top 20 parish crash data profiles were developed.

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Competitive application process

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 15 of 59

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Relative Weight in Scoring 

Available funding:2

Cost Effectiveness:1

Total Relative Weight:3

Program: Other-Safe Routes to Public Places

Date of Program Methodology:2/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

• Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Other-Demand 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

• Crash frequency

• Excess proportions of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program? 

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads? 

Yes

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation? 

• Competitive application process

• selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 16 of 59

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4). 

Relative Weight in Scoring 

Available funding:2

Cost Effectiveness:1

Total Relative Weight:3

What percentage of HSIP funds address systemic improvements? 

 26.3

 HSIP funds are used to address which of the following systemic improvements? 

• Add/Upgrade/Modify/Remove Traffic Signal

• Cable Median Barriers

• High friction surface treatment

• Install/Improve Pavement Marking and/or Delineation

• Install/Improve Signing

• Other-Roadway Departure Projects-Curves

• Rumble Strips

• Safety Edge

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? 

• Crash data analysis

• Data-driven safety analysis tools (HSM, CMF Clearinghouse, SafetyAnalyst, usRAP)

• Engineering Study

• Road Safety Assessment

• SHSP/Local road safety plan

• Stakeholder input

Does the State HSIP consider connected vehicles and ITS technologies? 

No

Does the State use the Highway Safety Manual to support HSIP efforts? 

Yes

Please describe how the State uses the HSM to support HSIP efforts. 

The Highway Safety Manual (HSM) was consulted for determining better methodologies for network screening 

and project level data analysis. Louisiana has developed state-specific safety performance functions and 

excel-based diagnostic tools for better targeting Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP) funds. Additionally, 

LA DOTD utilizes the HSM spreadsheets and CMF Clearing House for project level analysis. 
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 17 of 59

Project Implementation

Funds Programmed

Reporting period for HSIP funding. 

State Fiscal Year

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category. 

FUNDING CATEGORY PROGRAMMED OBLIGATED

% 

OBLIGATED/PROGRAMM

ED

HSIP (23 U.S.C. 148) $12,875,569 $59,553,407 462.53%

HRRR Special Rule (23 

U.S.C. 148(g)(1))

$3,085,174 $20,123 0.65%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

154)

$15,040,744 $13,824,928 91.92%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

164)

$15,040,744 $12,751,195 84.78%

RHCP (for HSIP purposes) 

(23 U.S.C. 130(e)(2))

$0 $0 0%

Other Federal-aid Funds 

(i.e. STBG, NHPP)

$30,300,000 $29,525,506 97.44%

State and Local Funds $0 $6,337,484 0%

Totals $76,342,231 $122,012,643 159.82%

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) or tribal 

safety projects?

$5,989,388

How much funding is obligated to local or tribal safety projects? 

$4,739,181

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

$250,000

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects? 

$6,204,270

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas 

during the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126? 

$3,085,174
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 18 of 59

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during 

the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126? 

$0

Discuss impediments to obligating HSIP funds and plans to overcome this challenge in 

the future. 

Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LA DOTD) has no impediments to obligating funds.
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 19 of 59

General Listing of Projects

List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period. 

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.001557 LA 4: Banks 

Springs-Jct. US 165

Roadway Roadway widening - travel 

lanes

1 Number

s

$5216.46 $5796.07 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.001557 LA 4: Banks 

Springs-Jct. US 165

Roadway Roadway widening - travel 

lanes

1 Number

s

$579.61 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.001749 LA 5 

Realignment and 

Cross Slop 

Improvement

Roadway Superelevation / cross slope 1 Number

s

$48357.31 $57514.97 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.001749 LA 5 

Realignment and 

Cross Slop 

Improvement

Roadway Superelevation / cross slope 1 Number

s

$9157.66 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.001769 LA 511: LA 

523-Fern Ave

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add two-way 

left-turn lane

1 Number

s

$-23719.1 $-26354.56 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.001769 LA 511: LA 

523-Fern Ave

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add two-way 

left-turn lane

1 Number

s

$-2635.46 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.002059 LA 384 @ 

LA 385

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$2264494.76 $2516105.29 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.002059 LA 384 @ 

LA 385

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$11689.99 $0 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e.

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.002059 LA 384 @ 

LA 385

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$239920.54 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.002163 

Roundabout on LA 

342 @ LA 724

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$207909.12 $207909.12 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.002370 LA 42 (US 

61 - LA 44)

Roadway Roadway widening - add 

lane(s) along segment

1 Number

s

$-261793.88 $-261793.88 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.002672 

Jackson(LA1208-3) 

@ Horseshoe 

Roundabout

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$1836940.35 $1836940.35 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 20 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.002822 Nicholson 

@ Brightside Lane

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$185962.58 $185962.58 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.003014 I-10: LA 347 

to Atchafalaya Fldwy

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$2039061.14 $2548826.42 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.003014 I-10: LA 347 

to Atchafalaya Fldwy

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$854082.46 $0 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.003014 I-10: LA 347 

to Atchafalaya Fldwy

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$-344317.18 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.006187 LA 15 @ 

Deer Park (S of LA 

565-Levee)

Roadway Roadway widening - curve 1 Number

s

$96300.88 $1292269.44 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.006524 Gretna 

Sidewalks and Safety 

Improvements

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1 Number

s

$513104.09 $11827.24 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.006524 Gretna 

Sidewalks and Safety 

Improvements

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1 Number

s

$58015.62 $0 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.006531 

Roundabout at Girard 

Pk and Hospital Dr.

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$582980 $802374.35 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.006531 

Roundabout at Girard 

Pk and Hospital Dr.

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$219394.35 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.006546 Intersection 

Upgrade N Canal & 

7th St.

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal - 

modernization/replacement

1 Number

s

$609624.85 $837288.32 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.006738 Kids On 

The Move! (Phase III)

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

1 Number

s

$5861.76 $5861.76 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.008178 LA 1030: 

LA 16 - LA 1026

Roadway Roadway widening - add 

lane(s) along segment

1 Number

s

$-273207.77 $-263564.18 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.008178 LA 1030: 

LA 16 - LA 1026

Roadway Roadway widening - add 

lane(s) along segment

1 Number

s

$-26356.41 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.008248 LA 1: 

Hospital Road & WB 

Left Turn Lane

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add two-way 

left-turn lane

1 Number

s

$0.11 $0.11 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.009152 Cleveland 

Ave: NS RR Xing

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection traffic control - 

other

1 Number

s

$7481.04 $7481.04 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 21 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.009282 St. John the 

Baptist Parish 

Sidewalks

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

1 Number

s

$3488.82 $621937.08 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.009308 New 

Orleans DPW SRTS 

Sidewalk

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Modify existing crosswalk 1 Number

s

$217408.52 $0 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.009460 St. 

Tammany Parish 

Signing & Striping

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

1 Number

s

$0 $638951.16 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.009475 LA 538: 

Roundabout At 

Ravendale 

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - no control to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$-42126.84 $-42126.84 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.009726 US 90: JTurns (Access Mgmt)Access 

management

Median crossover - directional 

crossover

1 Number

s

$102435.95 $114645.1 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 corridor Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.009726 US 90: JTurns (Access Mgmt)Access 

management

Median crossover - directional 

crossover

1 Number

s

$12209.15 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 corridor Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.009863 BNSF (New 

Iberia) Evangeline St.

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$206.55 $206.55 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.009875 UP (Eunice) 

Samuel Dr.

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$430997.77 $430997.77 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010069 UP (W. 

Baton Rouge) 

Winterville

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$333531.51 $333531.51 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010077 IC 

(Reserve) Several RR 

X-Ing

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$912878.44 $912878.44 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010082 IC 

(Lutcher/Gramercy) 

Several

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$252285.02 $252285.02 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010087 US 51 B @ 

I-12: Clear & 

Grub(Roundabouts)

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$-43063.73 $-47848.59 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010087 US 51 B @ 

I-12: Clear & 

Grub(Roundabouts)

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$-4784.86 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010088 KCS 

(DeRidder) Several 

RR X-Ing

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$726010.46 $726010.46 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 22 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.010098 KCS 

(Vernon) Several RR 

X-Ing Vernon Parish

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$12483.14 $12483.14 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010100 Pesson 

Elementary Sidewalks

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1 Number

s

$3220 $29508.74 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.010109 Raceland 

and Bayou Blue 

Sidewalks

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1 Number

s

$1932946.88 $0 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.010109 Raceland 

and Bayou Blue 

Sidewalks

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1 Number

s

$91843.35 $2024790.23 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.010124 LA 16: 

Roundabout @ LA 

447

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$1838662.09 $1838662.09 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010178 LA 120: 

Curve Realignment

Alignment Horizontal curve realignment 1 Number

s

$-77787.52 $-86430.58 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.010178 LA 120: 

Curve Realignment

Alignment Horizontal curve realignment 1 Number

s

$-8643.06 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.010184 LA 59:

Curve Realign and 

Tunnel

Alignment Horizontal curve realignment 1 Number

s

$2180943.72 $2423270.8 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.010184 LA 59: 

Curve Realign and 

Tunnel

Alignment Horizontal curve realignment 1 Number

s

$242327.08 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.010197 US 171: JTurn @ N. Perkins 

Ferry Rd.

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other 1 Number

s

$-202966.03 $-225517.82 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010197 US 171: JTurn @ N. Perkins 

Ferry Rd.

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other 1 Number

s

$-22551.79 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010202 I-20: Exit 

Lane Extension (Exits 

3 & 5)

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$-4533.96 $-5037.73 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010202 I-20: Exit 

Lane Extension (Exits 

3 & 5)

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$-503.77 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010204 US 425: 

Roundabout @ Julia & 

Louisa

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - traffic signal to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$817116.86 $817116.86 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 23 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.010255 I-20 Tree 

Removal in Bienville

Roadside Removal of roadside objects 

(trees, poles, etc.)

1 Number

s

$-4597.45 $-5108.28 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.010255 I-20 Tree 

Removal in Bienville

Roadside Removal of roadside objects 

(trees, poles, etc.)

1 Number

s

$-510.83 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.010275 LA 792: 

Curve Improvement

Alignment Horizontal curve realignment 1 Number

s

$-155325.62 $-172584.02 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.010275 LA 792: 

Curve Improvement

Alignment Horizontal curve realignment 1 Number

s

$-17258.4 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.010280 US 167: 

Left Turn Lane SB 

from LA 28

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$-19.84 $-22.04 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010280 US 167: 

Left Turn Lane SB 

from LA 28

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$-2.2 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010287 LA 3249: 

Roundabout @ I20/Well Rd.

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$10629.55 $10629.55 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010353 US 167: 

Access Management 

(Lft Turn Lns)

Access 

management

Median crossover - directional 

crossover

1 Number

s

$14801025.6

5

$16445584.0

5

HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 corridor Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010353 US 167: 

Access Management 

(Lft Turn Lns)

Access 

management

Median crossover - directional 

crossover

1 Number

s

$1644558.4 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 corridor Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010443 LA 308: 

Curve Realign and 

Shoulders

Roadway Roadway widening - curve 1 Number

s

$31381.33 $0 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.010443 LA 308: 

Curve Realign and 

Shoulders

Roadway Roadway widening - curve 1 Number

s

$52366.58 $2829922.3 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.010443 LA 308: 

Curve Realign and 

Shoulders

Roadway Roadway widening - curve 1 Number

s

$277755.57 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.010683 I-55: 

Median Cable Barrier

Roadside Barrier - cable 1 Number

s

$334729.76 $334729.76 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.010688 LA 3235: 

Imp @ LA 3162, LA 

3161 & LA 657

Access 

management

Median crossover - directional 

crossover

1 Number

s

$4413859.16 $4904287.96 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 corridor Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010688 LA 3235: 

Imp @ LA 3162, LA 

3161 & LA 657

Access 

management

Median crossover - directional 

crossover

1 Number

s

$490428.8 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 corridor Intersection

s

Pages 3-12
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 24 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.010795 LA 42: 

Roundabout at Joe 

Sevario Rd.

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$15996.18 $15996.18 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010864 I-10: District 

07 Cable Barrier

Roadside Barrier - cable 1 Number

s

$335178.15 $335178.15 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.010865 I-210: Cove 

Ln Intg - E Jct I-10

Roadside Barrier - cable 1 Number

s

$62100.45 $62100.45 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.010894 US 165: 

Right Turn Lane at LA 

112

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$-9797.99 $-10886.65 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010894 US 165: 

Right Turn Lane at LA 

112

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$-1088.66 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.010922 LA 88 

Realign Curves in 

Coteau

Roadway Roadway widening - curve 1 Number

s

$14923.76 $16581.96 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.010922 LA 88 

Realign Curves in 

Coteau

Roadway Roadway widening - curve 1 Number

s

$1658.2 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011024 I-10: Med 

Protection, Oak 

Harbor

Roadside Barrier - other 1 Number

s

$3485832.33 $14850510.2

5

HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011024 I-10: Med 

Protection, Oak 

Harbor

Roadside Barrier - cable 1 Number

s

$2772359.59 $14850510.2

5

Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011024 I-10: Med 

Protection, Oak 

Harbor

Roadside Barrier - other 1 Number

s

$1548261.25 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011030 LA 59: 

Roundabout @ 

Lonesome Rd.

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$2278176.44 $2293120.64 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011030 LA 59: 

Roundabout @ 

Lonesome Rd.

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$14944.2 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011108 NS Several 

RR Xings (New 

Orleans)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection signing - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$677670.31 $677670.31 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011135 E. Perdue: 

IC RR Xing (Baton 

Rouge)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$274006.2 $274006.2 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 25 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.011144 ALM 

Several RR 

Xings(Ouach & 

Morehouse)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection signing - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$339680.2 $339680.2 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011196 Lake 

Charles SRTS Proj. 

Barbe Elem.

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1 Number

s

$-26565.96 $-26565.96 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.011216 City of 

Slidell Pavement 

Markings

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

1 Number

s

$74928.79 $46628.79 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011220 I-10: NO 

CBD2 CarrolltonLafitte Ave

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

1 Number

s

$8294737.51 $8294737.51 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011224 US 190: 

Guardrail/Rutting Rep. 

(Phase 1)

Roadside Barrier- metal 1 Number

s

$689132.76 $689132.76 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011261 LA 427: S. 

Acadian Thruway, I10-LA 73

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometrics - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$3666599.48 $3666599.48 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011278 I-12: 

Median Cable Barrier

Roadside Barrier - cable 1 Number

s

$5278967.47 $5278967.47 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011291 Dale, LA 

677 & 344: LDRR 

Xings (New Iberia)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$803113.25 $803113.25 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011295 LA 73 (Govt 

St) East Blvd-Lobdell 

Ave

Roadway Roadway narrowing (road diet, 

roadway reconfiguration)

1 Number

s

$3011396.58 $3307559.53 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.011295 LA 73 (Govt 

St) East Blvd-Lobdell 

Ave

Roadway Roadway narrowing (road diet, 

roadway reconfiguration)

1 Number

s

$296162.95 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.011296 LCHD 

Several RR Xings

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection signing - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$157963.06 $157963.06 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011302 LA 28: Left 

Turn Lanes At LA 116

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$-21309.37 $-23677.08 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011302 LA 28: Left 

Turn Lanes At LA 116

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$-2367.71 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011306 Robbins 

Rd: UP RR Xing 

(Forest Hill)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$328977.15 $328977.15 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 26 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.011314 LA 22: Near 

I-10 Geometric Improv

Access 

management

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access

1 Number

s

$9075.23 $36282.57 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011314 LA 22: Near 

I-10 Geometric Improv

Access 

management

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access

1 Number

s

$27207.34 $0 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011315 GOGR 

Several RR Xings 

(EBR & E. Feliciana)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$102319.69 $102319.69 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011323 

Nighthawk/Span Trl: 

BNSF RR

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$28769.66 $28769.66 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011424 LA 157: 

Booker Rd to LA 614 

Corridor Study

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-5114.02 $-5114.02 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Planning Pages 3-8

H.011428 LA 3105: 

Greenacres to LA 72 

Corridor Study

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-14926.65 $-14926.65 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Planning Pages 3-8

H.011660 LA 3225: 

Turn Lanes at LA 623

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$83100.09 $161113.99 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011660 LA 3225: 

Turn Lanes at LA 623

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$78013.9 $0 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011688 US 165: 

Corridor Study

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-15429.28 $-16991.88 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Planning Pages 3-8

H.011688 US 165: 

Corridor Study

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-1562.6 $0 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Planning Pages 3-8

H.011723 Cotton & 

Silo: BNSF RR Xings 

(St.Mary)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$245852.89 $245852.89 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011786 Railroad 

St.: BNSF RR Xing 

(Cade)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$579307 $696614 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011786 Railroad 

St.: BNSF RR Xing 

(Cade)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$117307 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011789 LA 14 BYP: 

Right Turn Lane at US 

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$322542.23 $358380.26 HSIP (23

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 27 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.011789 LA 14 BYP: 

Right Turn Lane at US 

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$35838.03 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011846 Desiard 

Street Striping

Intersection 

traffic control

Pavement markings - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$-79863.22 $-79863.22 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011880 Districts 08 

& 58 Low Cost Safety

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

1 Number

s

$-28692.26 $-222427.46 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011880 Districts 08 

& 58 Low Cost Safety

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

1 Number

s

$62570.07 $0 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011880 Districts 08 

& 58 Low Cost Safety

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

1 Number

s

$-131165.13 $0 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011881 KCS (New 

Roads) Corridor

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$2442919.39 $2442919.39 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 corridor Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.011895 City of 

Monroe Guardrail

Roadside Barrier- metal 1 Number

s

$-2431.62 $-2431.62 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011910 LA 3132 

Cable Barrier: I-20 to 

LA 523

Roadside Barrier - cable 1 Number

s

$-328190.43 $-328190.43 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011917 I-49: MLK 

Dr. to Arkansas S/L

Roadside Barrier - cable 1 Number

s

$6769307.65 $8456077.57 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011917 I-49: MLK 

Dr. to Arkansas S/L

Roadside Barrier - cable 1 Number

s

$1686769.92 $0 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011918 Vidalia 

Traffic Study

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-3325.43 $-3325.43 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 corridor Planning Pages 3-8

H.011925 I-310 

Median Cable Barrier

Roadside Barrier - cable 1 Number

s

$-87741.46 $-87741.46 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011926 I-10 & I-59: 

Median Cable Barrier

Roadside Barrier - cable 1 Number

s

$269254.47 $269254.47 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011931 LA 184: LA 

184 & LA 468

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - two-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$208092.86 $208092.86 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 28 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.011933 US 190 

Median Barrier

Roadside Barrier - cable 1 Number

s

$782571.65 $782571.65 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011943 District 05 

Low Cost Safety

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

1 Number

s

$167991.93 $190972.45 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011943 District 05 

Low Cost Safety

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

1 Number

s

$4314.75 $0 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.011943 District 05 

Low Cost Safety

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

1 Number

s

$18665.77 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.012049 I-20: WB 

Exit Ramp Extension 

At Minden

Interchange 

design

Extend existing lane on ramp 1 Number

s

$452396.07 $502662.3 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012049 I-20: WB 

Exit Ramp Extension 

At Minden

Interchange 

design

Extend existing lane on ramp 1 Number

s

$50266.23 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012078 LA 429: 

Improvements At LA 

431

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$455077.8 $568847.26 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012078 LA 429: 

Improvements At LA 

431

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$113769.46 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012081 LA 338 @ 

LA 14-Bypass

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$605729.26 $757161.58 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012081 LA 338 @ 

LA 14-Bypass

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$151432.32 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012143 LA 451: LA 

114 to P Laborde Rd.

Roadway Roadway widening - add 

lane(s) along segment

1 Number

s

$20123.01 $20123.01 HRRR 

Special 

Rule (23 

U.S.C. 

148(g)(1))

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-12

H.012194 US 167: 

Cable Barriers 

Rapides

Roadside Barrier - cable 1 Number

s

$-1970.34 $-1970.34 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 29 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.012205 GOGR 

Several RR Xings 

(District 61)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection signing - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$71165.01 $71165.01 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012236 North 

Kenner Pedestrian 

Safety

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1 Number

s

$227496.8 $227496.8 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.012272 LA 3060: Rt 

Turn Lane @ US 90

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$150149.64 $187687.05 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012272 LA 3060: Rt 

Turn Lane @ US 90

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$37537.41 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012276 US 61: JTurns at Thomas Rd.Access 

management

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access

1 Number

s

$1291880.18 $1435422.43 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012276 US 61: JTurns at Thomas Rd.Access 

management

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access

1 Number

s

$143542.25 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012279 Endom 

Bridge Approach 

Realignment

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometrics - 

modify intersection corner 

radius

1 Number

s

$90950.57 $90950.57 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012287 I-49 NB Exit 

Ramp at LA 98

Interchange 

design

Interchange design - other 1 Number

s

$115119.54 $127910.6 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012287 I-49 NB Exit 

Ramp at LA 99

Interchange 

design

Interchange design - other 1 Number

s

$12791.06 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012297 McMillan 

Rd/Blanchard St.

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Pedestrian signal 1 Number

s

$141269.03 $141269.03 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.012324 US 61: Fl 

Blvd-Miss River 

(Study)

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$0 $419851.97 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.012331 2017-2024 

LSU Data 

Entry/Analysis

Noninfrastructure Data/traffic records 1 Number

s

$4101358.72 $1868977.95 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 planning Data Pages 3-8

H.012347 LA 182: Rt 

Turn Lanes @ LA 660 

& LA 316

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$618990.96 $773738.7 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012347 LA 182: Rt 

Turn Lanes @ LA 660 

& LA 316

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$154747.74 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 30 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.012350 LA 128: 

Gilbert - Como

Roadway Roadway widening - travel 

lanes

1 Number

s

$206705.2 $2184870.05 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 corridor Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.012350 LA 128: 

Gilbert - Como

Roadway Roadway widening - travel 

lanes

1 Number

s

$38980.03 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 corridor Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.012356 Ellerbe & 

Yearwood: UP RR 

Xings

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$612900.57 $612900.57 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012369 US 190 

Barrier Feasibility

Study

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-46695.69 $-46695.69 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.012393 LA 98: 

Roundabout at Mills

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - all-way stop to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$20876.73 $20876.73 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Planning Pages 3-8

H.012424 I-610 at St. 

Bernard Ave

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

1 Number

s

$692778.13 $-89232.87 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.012433 Holly St.: 

KCS RR Xing 

(DeQuincy)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$339086.36 $339086.36 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012434 Holbrook 

Park Rd: KCS RR 

Xing(Calcasieu)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$380597.02 $380597.02 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012436 Calhoun 

Dairy Rd: KCS RR 

Xing

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$276243.33 $276243.33 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012443 LA 22: 

Audible Thermoplastic

Roadway Rumble strips - unspecified or 

other

1 Number

s

$-27126.52 $-27126.52 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.012464 Dist. 58 

FYA

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal - add 

flashing yellow arrow

1 Number

s

$765050.99 $765050.99 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Systemic Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012473 Zachary 

Taylor & Marconi Dr

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1 Number

s

$94253.48 $145631.8 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.012473 Zachary 

Taylor & Marconi Dr

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1 Number

s

$51378.32 $0 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 31 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.012477 Kenner 

Signs & Pavement

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

1 Number

s

$184735.63 $-0.01 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012477 Kenner 

Signs & Pavement

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

1 Number

s

$23747.34 $0 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012479 Audubon 

Ave & Ardoyne Dr. 

Mini Roundabout

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - no control to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$0 $404059.83 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012482 LA 46: St. 

Claude @ Elysian 

Fields

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometrics - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$-15784.48 $-17538.31 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012482 LA 46: St. 

Claude @ Elysian 

Fields

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometrics - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$-1753.83 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012527 Local Road 

Safety Upgrades (W 

Feliciana)

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

1 Number

s

$77990.86 $77990.86 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.012553 LA 541: LA 

18(Louisiana)-LA 18

(4th)

Intersection 

traffic control

Pavement markings - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$599463.18 $2387333 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 corridor Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012553 LA 541: LA 

18(Louisiana)-LA 18 

(4th)

Intersection 

traffic control

Pavement markings - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$5908.97 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 corridor Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012593 LA 308: 

Turn Lane at LA 648

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$395344 $494180.01 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012593 LA 308: 

Turn Lane at LA 648

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$98836.01 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012600 LA 18: Left 

Turn Lane @ LA 3060

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$357129.57 $446411.97 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012600 LA 18: Left 

Turn Lane @ LA 3060

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$89282.4 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012609 LA 182: 

Right Turn Lane @ LA 

24

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$234666.4 $293333 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 32 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

STBG, 

NHPP)

H.012609 LA 182: 

Right Turn Lane @ LA 

24

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$58666 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012612 LA 39: 

Right Turn Lane @ Dr 

Meraux Blvd

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$79457.26 $99321.58 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012612 LA 39: 

Right Turn Lane @ Dr 

Meraux Blvd

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$19864.32 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012640 LA 3246@I10 Signal 

Performance Measure

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal - 

modernization/replacement

1 Number

s

$190148.13 $190148.13 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012670 US 51B 

Near CM Fagan Dr. 

Signal Perf Meas

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal - 

modernization/replacement

1 Number

s

$153734.38 $153734.38 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012687 I-49 

Interchange Safety 

Improvement Studies

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-30094.96 $-30094.96 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Planning Pages 3-8

H.012720 Snooky's 

Rd: UP RR Xing 

(Allen)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$335472.2 $335472.2 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012724 Bolinger 

Cutoff Rd: UP-N of 

Plain Dealing

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$273414.81 $273414.81 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012725 Avenue G: 

NOGC Xing (Belle 

Chase)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$0 $442000.45 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012747 LA 20: Low 

Cost Safety

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - new

1 Number

s

$-4709.71 $-5233.01 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.012747 LA 20: Low 

Cost Safety

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - new

1 Number

s

$-523.3 $0 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.012770 LDRR CBA 

Project (Districts 02, 

03,61)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection signing - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$0 $448800.67 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Intersection

s

Pages 3-12
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 33 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.012782 JenningsFrank-Chateb'ry UP 

(St. Landry)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$1399843.36 $1399843.36 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012784 TIBR CBA 

Project(Beauregard)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection signing - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$96019.04 $96019.04 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012798 LA 594: 

Roundabout at 

Rowland

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify control - no control to 

roundabout

1 Number

s

$47458.52 $47458.52 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012800 Local 

Roads HFST 

(Lafayette)

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

1 Number

s

$44563.45 $44563.45 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.012817 LA 928: 

Low Cost Safety

Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal pavement 

markings - new

1 Number

s

$-44988.17 $-46534.31 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.012817 LA 928: 

Low Cost Safety

Roadway 

delineation

Raised pavement markers 1 Number

s

$-1546.14 $0 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.012820 LA 378 @ 

LA 378 Spur: 

Intersection Improv

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometrics - reassign existing lane use1 Number

s

$29720.55 $33022.83 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012820 LA 378 @ 

LA 378 Spur: 

Intersection Improv

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometrics - reassign existing lane use1 Number

s

$3302.28 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012836 LA 3127: 

Right Turn Lane at LA 

3141

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$135840.64 $169800.8 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012836 LA 3127: 

Right Turn Lane at LA 

3141

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add right-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$33960.116 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012858 Choctaw 

Road Striping

Roadway 

delineation

Improve retroreflectivity 1 Number

s

$53729.25 $53729.25 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 corridor Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.012874 I-55: LA 22 

Interstate Lighting

Lighting Site lighting - intersection 1 Number

s

$1836206.39 $2040229.33 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012874 I-55: LA 22 

Interstate Lighting

Lighting Site lighting - intersection 1 Number

s

$204022.94 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 34 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.012875 I-12: LA 

1026 (Juban Rd) 

Intchg Lighing

Lighting Site lighting - interchange 1 Number

s

$1051879.63 $1168755.15 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012875 I-12: LA 

1026 (Juban Rd) 

Intchg Lighing

Lighting Site lighting - interchange 1 Number

s

$116875.52 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012903 LA 70: 

RCUT at LA 3120

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - add left-turn 

lane

1 Number

s

$-403009.08 $-403009.08 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012911 US 90: 

Median Crossover 

Removal

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other 1 Number

s

$604771.68 $755964.61 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.012911 US 90: 

Median Crossover 

Removal

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other 1 Number

s

$151192.93 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.013029 Baton 

Rouge Ped/Bike 

Safety

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$250003 $0 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.013029 Baton 

Rouge Ped/Bike 

Safety

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-283003.4 $-33000.4 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.013058 Brooklawn 

Dr: BRS RR Xing(East 

Baton Rouge)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection signing - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$7197.42 $7197.42 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.013059 LAS RR 

CBA Project (Dist 04, 

05, & 08)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection signing - 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$530008 $530008 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Systemic Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.013084 Peltier Park 

Sidewalk

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1 Number

s

$223419.85 $223419.85 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.013088 Hatchell 

Lane Sidewalks

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1 Number

s

$-228.94 $-228.94 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.013090 Gretna 

Downtown Pedestrian 

Improvements

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1 Number

s

$162617.59 $162617.59 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Pedestrians Pages 3-8
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 35 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.013099 US 165 @ 

US 84: J-Turns

Access 

management

Median crossover - directional 

crossover

1 Number

s

$249051.59 $276723.99 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.013099 US 165 @ 

US 84: J-Turns

Access 

management

Median crossover - directional 

crossover

1 Number

s

$27672.4 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.013278 Dist. 02BC 

Flashing Yellow Arrow 

Part 1

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal - add 

flashing yellow arrow

1 Number

s

$4354514.58 $4354514.58 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Systemic Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.013322 LA 3040 

Feasibility Study

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$0 $327337.68 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Planning Pages 3-8

H.013532 Denham 

Springs Road Signing 

& Striping

Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs (including post) 

- new or updated

1 Number

s

$79240 $79240 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.013539 South 

Central Bike Ped 

Safety

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$0 $67389.07 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 planning Pedestrians Pages 3-8

H.013561 I-10: 

Pavement Marker 

Replacement I

Roadway 

delineation

Raised pavement markers 1 Number

s

$107925 $107925 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.013563 I-20: 

Pavement Marker 

Replacement VI

Roadway 

delineation

Raised pavement markers 1 Number

s

$208825 $208825 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.013565 I-10: 

Pavement Marker 

Replacement II

Roadway 

delineation

Raised pavement markers 1 Number

s

$139015.3 $139015.5 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.013566 I-110: 

Pavement Marker 

Replacement I

Roadway 

delineation

Raised pavement markers 1 Number

s

$209600 $209600 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.013568 I-49: 

Paement Marking 

Replacement VII

Roadway 

delineation

Raised pavement markers 1 Number

s

$386550.5 $386550.5 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 36 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.013586 I-10: Canal 

St - St. Philip St

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

1 Number

s

$2405110.87 $2405110.87 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.013592 2018-2012 

SHSP Acadiana 

Regional Coal

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$26095.48 $26095.48 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.013660 2018-2023 

SHSP Southwest 

Regional Coal

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$227746.57 $227746.57 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 Planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.013716 US 167: 

Camellia BlvdChurchill Dr (study)

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$3763.21 $3763.21 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.013720 Bonner St 

Bridge Ped Impr 

(study)

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$3763.21 $3763.21 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.013722 Morgan City 

Sidewalks & Shared 

Use Path(study)

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$3763.21 $3763.21 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.013751 Downtown 

Greenway LA 

Connector (study)

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$3763.21 $3763.21 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.013763 LRSP Signs 

& Striping (Vernon, 

Sabine)

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$7526.43 $7526.43 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.013766 Local Road 

Signs & 

Striping(Caddo)

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$7526.43 $7526.43 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.013767 Signs & 

Markings(St. Landry & 

St.Martin)(Study)

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$7526.43 $7526.43 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.013769 Local Road 

Signing (Bienville) 

(Study)

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$3763.21 $3763.21 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.013770 LRSP 

Signing/Striping(Iberia

) (study)

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$7526.43 $7526.43 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.013772 Systemic 

Curve Signing 

(Acadia)(study)

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$3763.21 $3763.21 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.013773 2018-2012 

SHSP N.O & N. Shore 

Coalitions

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$316134.88 $316134.88 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 37 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.013789 Curve 

Signing & 

Striping(Evangeline) 

(Study)

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$3763.21 $3763.21 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Planning Pages 3-8

H.013799 2018-2023 

SHSP Northwest 

Regional Coal.

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$306119.87 $306119.87 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.013807 US 

190:0.04 MI W of S 

Frusha Dr

Roadway 

delineation

Roadway delineation - other 1 Number

s

$107501.88 $107501.88 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 Spot Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.013826 District 07 

Safety Investment 

Plan

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$302079.73 $302079.73 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 planning Data Pages 3-8

H.013853 Idustrial 

Park Rd: AKDN 

Xing(Evangeline)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$0 $325649.3 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.013878 LA 28 

Signal Performance 

Measures

Intersection 

traffic control

Modify traffic signal - 

modernization/replacement

1 Number

s

$207110.16 $207110.16 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.013879 US 79: TX 

S/L to 0.2 MI E of TX 

S/L

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other 1 Number

s

$353756.26 $442195.33 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.013879 US 79: TX 

S/L to 0.2 MI E of TX 

S/L

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other 1 Number

s

$88439.07 $0 State and 

Local Funds

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.013893 I-20: I220-

I220 & I-49: LA 3132-

I20 RPM

Roadway 

delineation

Raised pavement markers 1 Number

s

$901460 $901460 Other 

Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, 

NHPP)

0 0 Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Pages 3-

11/12

H.971121 KCS (Delta) Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$-496.85 $-496.85 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.971236 BNSF 

(Morgan City)

Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection flashers - add 

miscellaneous/other/unspecifie

d

1 Number

s

$22.26 $22.26 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

0 0 Spot Intersection

s

Pages 3-12

H.972128 Capital 

Region Coalition

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-0.01 $-0.01 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 38 of 59

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMEN

T CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS

OUTPU

T TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGOR

Y

LAND 

USE/ARE

A TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATIO

N

AAD

T

SPEE

D

OWNERSHI

P

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTIO

N

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEG

Y

H.972137 LCG 

Coalition Coordinator

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-19633.08 $-19633.08 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.972143 Northeast 

Regional Coal. Coord.

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-2635.43 $-2635.43 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.972144 Central LA 

Regional Coal. Coord.

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-405.57 $-405.57 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.972145 Southwest 

Reg. Coal. Coord.

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-23624.37 $-23624.37 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.972160 S Central 

Reg. Coal. Coord.

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-62388.57 $-62388.57 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.972177 LA Center 

for Transp. Safety

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-145829.91 $-145829.91 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.972277 Section 33 

LTAP 1/1/2017-

12/31/2017

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$-68151.03 $-68151.03 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.972313 Planning 

Work Program 

7/1/2018

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$1323480 $1323480 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 164)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8

H.972316 Section 33 

LTAP 1/1/2018-

12/31/2018

Noninfrastructure Transportation safety planning 1 Number

s

$16061.47 $16061.47 Penalty 

Funds (23 

U.S.C. 154)

0 0 planning Planning Pages 3-8
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 39 of 59

Safety Performance

General Highway Safety Trends

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the State for the past five 

years.

PERFOR

MANCE 

MEASUR

ES

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Fatalities 721 680 723 703 740 752 757 771 771

Serious 

Injuries

1,443 1,416 1,396 1,330 1,346 1,396 1,398 1,327 1,263

Fatality 

rate (per 

HMVMT)

1.580 1.460 1.550 1.470 1.530 1.560 1.550 1.570 1.520

Serious 

injury rate 

(per 

HMVMT)

3.170 3.050 2.980 2.780 2.800 2.900 2.860 2.690 2.520

Number 

nonmotorized 

fatalities

90 111 145 111 122 142 150 139 195

Number 

of nonmotorized 

serious 

injuries

145 159 156 185 181 199 201 206 222
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 40 of 59

620

640

660

680

700

720

740

760

780

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Annual Fatalities

Fatalities 5 Year Rolling Avg.

1150

1200

1250

1300

1350

1400

1450

1500

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Annual Serious Injuries

Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 41 of 59

1.4

1.42

1.44

1.46

1.48

1.5

1.52

1.54

1.56

1.58

1.6

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Fatality rate (per HMVMT)

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 42 of 59

Describe fatality data source. 

FARS

To the maximum extent possible, present this data by functional classification and 

ownership. 

Year 2018

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

 (5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

 (5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Interstate

43.6 31.2 0.72 0.52

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other

42.6 25.4 1.53 0.91

Rural Minor Arterial 61.8 44.6 1.97 1.43

Rural Minor Collector 30.2 18.4 2.69 1.64

Rural Major Collector 94.4 46.4 2.76 1.35

Rural Local Road or 

Street

9.8 9.2 2.35 2.33

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Non Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Fatalities Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 43 of 59

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

 (5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

 (5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Interstate

69.2 132.4 0.75 1.45

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

5.4 8.2 0.46 0.78

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other

115 296.6 1.58 4.08

Urban Minor Arterial 85.8 133.6 1.95 3.03

Urban Minor Collector

Urban Major Collector 40.6 44.2 2.94 3.2

Urban Local Road or 

Street
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 44 of 59

Year 2018

Roadways Number of Fatalities

 (5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

 (5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

 (5-yr avg)

State Highway 

Agency

605.8 817.2 1.49 2.01

County Highway 

Agency

77.4 176.2 4.13 9.4

Town or Township 

Highway Agency

City or Municipal 

Highway Agency

70.2 345.4 1.18 5.79

State Park, Forest, or 

Reservation Agency

Local Park, Forest or 

Reservation Agency

Other State Agency

Other Local Agency

Private (Other than 

Railroad)

Railroad

State Toll Authority

Local Toll Authority 18.4

Other Public 

Instrumentality (e.g. 

Airport, School, 

University)

Indian Tribe Nation

Urban local road is not populating correctly. Statewide routes are only provided. Non state owned roadways 

are not included.

Safety Performance Targets

Safety Performance Targets 

Calendar Year 2020 Targets *

Number of Fatalities:743.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 45 of 59

The overall goal is to reduce fatal and serious injury crashes on Louisiana roadways. As mentioned 

previously, Louisiana Highway Safety Commission (LHSC) and the Louisiana Department of 

Transportation and Development (LA DOTD) teamed up to identify consistent goals to be adopted by 

both agencies. The two agencies agreed to adopt the American Association of State Highway and 

Transportation Officials (AASHTO) goal of halving fatalities by 2030. Louisiana’s Strategic Highway 

Safety Plan (SHSP), which the LA DOTD oversees, reflects this overall goal as well. Despite an 

increase in fatalities and serious injuries over the last few years, it was decided to renew the 

commitment to saving lives and continue to set decreasing targets. LA DOTD reviewed the actual and 

linear trend of fatalities, fatality rate, serious injuries, serious injury rate and the statewide nonmotorized fatalities and serious injuries over 5 year moving periods dating back to 2005. Trends were 

evaluated to determine if a linear trend could be established and carried through 2020. In most cases, 

a linear trend-derived target was adopted. These targets are less aggressive than in years past and 

represent a 1% annual decrease from the most current 5-year average. Based on historical data, the 

number of fatalities has increased annually over the last 5 years from 740 in 2014 to 769 in 2018. A 

steady percentage based reduction was chosen as the most practical justification for determine the 

2020 target. To achieve the 2020 target, fatalities will have to be reduced by two percent from 758 

(2014 to 2018 average) to 743.0 in 2020.

Number of Serious Injuries:1319.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. The overall goal is to 

reduce fatal and serious injury crashes on Louisiana roadways. As mentioned previously, LHSC and 

the LA DOTD teamed up to identify consistent goals to be adopted by both agencies. The two 

agencies agreed to adopt the AASHTO goal of halving fatalities by 2030. The SHSP, which the LA 

DOTD oversees, reflects this overall goal as well. Despite an increase in fatalities and serious injuries 

over the last few years, it was decided to renew the commitment to saving lives and continue to set 

decreasing targets. LA DOTD reviewed the actual and linear trend of fatalities, fatality rate, serious 

injuries, serious injury rate and the statewide non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries over 5 year 

moving periods dating back to 2005. Trends were evaluated to determine if a linear trend could be 

established and carried through 2019. In most cases, a linear trend-derived target was adopted. 

These targets are less aggressive than in years past and represent a 1% annual decrease from the 

most current 5-year average. Serious injuries have fluctuated over the last five years and have 

decreased from a five-year high of 1398 in 2016 to a five-year low of 1262 in 2018. A five-year 

average trend line was chosen as the most practical justification for determining the 2020 target 

based on trends and current programs enacted to address overall serious injuries in the State. To 

achieve the 2020 target, serious injuries will have to be reduced by two percent from 1346 (2014 to 

2018 average) to 1319 in 2020.

Fatality Rate:1.518

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

The overall goal is to reduce fatal and serious injury crashes on Louisiana roadways. As mentioned 

previously, LHSC and the LA DOTD teamed up to identify consistent goals to be adopted by both 

agencies. The two agencies agreed to adopt the AASHTO goal of halving fatalities by 2030. The 

SHSP, which the LA DOTD oversees, reflects this overall goal as well. Despite an increase in 

fatalities and serious injuries over the last few years, it was decided to renew the commitment to 

saving lives and continue to set decreasing targets. LA DOTD reviewed the actual and linear trend of 
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 46 of 59

fatalities, fatality rate, serious injuries, serious injury rate and the statewide non-motorized fatalities 

and serious injuries over 5 year moving periods dating back to 2005. Trends were evaluated to 

determine if a linear trend could be established and carried through 2020. In most cases, a linear 

trend-derived target was adopted. These targets are less aggressive than in years past and represent 

a 1% annual decrease from the most current 5-year average. The 1% decrease was chosen despite 

the probable increase in vehicle miles driven. To achieve the 2020 target, the fatality rate per 100 

MVMT will have to be reduced by 2.0 percent from 1.548 (2014 to 2018 average) to 1.518 in 2020.

Serious Injury Rate:2.696

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

The overall goal is to reduce fatal and serious injury crashes on Louisiana roadways. As mentioned 

previously, LHSC and the LA DOTD teamed up to identify consistent goals to be adopted by both 

agencies. The two agencies agreed to adopt the AASHTO goal of halving fatalities by 2030. The 

SHSP, which the LA DOTD oversees, reflects this overall goal as well. Despite an increase in 

fatalities and serious injuries over the last few years, it was decided to renew the commitment to 

saving lives and continue to set decreasing targets. LA DOTD reviewed the actual and linear trend of 

fatalities, fatality rate, serious injuries, serious injury rate and the statewide non-motorized fatalities 

and serious injuries over 5 year moving periods dating back to 2005. Trends were evaluated to 

determine if a linear trend could be established and carried through 2020. In most cases, a linear 

trend-derived target was adopted. These targets are less aggressive than in years past and represent 

a 1% annual decrease from the most current 5-year average. The 1% decrease was chosen despite 

the probable increase in vehicle miles driven. To achieve the 2020 target, the serious injury rate per 

100 MVMT will have to be reduced by 2.0 percent from 2.745 (2014 to 2018 average) to 2.696 in 

2020.

Total Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries:345.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

The overall goal is to reduce fatal and serious injury crashes on Louisiana roadways. This goal is 

especially critical for our most vulnerable non-motorized users, a population that has seen rapid 

growth in recent years. As mentioned previously, LHSC and the LA DOTD teamed up to identify 

consistent goals to be adopted by both agencies. The two agencies agreed to adopt the AASHTO 

goal of halving fatalities by 2030 for all road users. The SHSP, which the LADOTD oversees, reflects 

this overall goal as well. Despite an increase in fatalities and serious injuries over the last few years, it 

was decided to renew the commitment to saving lives and continue to set decreasing targets. LA 

DOTD reviewed the actual and linear trend of fatalities, fatality rate, serious injuries, serious injury 

rate and the statewide non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries over 5 year moving periods dating 

back to 2005. Trends were evaluated to determine if a linear trend could be established and carried 

through 2020. In most cases, a linear trend-derived target was adopted. These targets are less 

aggressive than in years past and represent a 1% annual decrease from the most current 5-year 

average. Non-motorized user fatalities and serious injuries have increased in 2018 to an all-time high 

(since tracking began in 2005) of 417, up 38% from 303 in 2014. However as practical solutions are 

implemented and as awareness is heightened we feel confident that a 1% decrease annually can be 

realized. To achieve the 2020 target, the non-motorized users fatalities and serious injuries will have 

to be reduced by 2.0 percent from 352 (2014 to 2018 average) to 345.0 in 2020.
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 47 of 59

Describe efforts to coordinate with other stakeholders (e.g. MPOs, SHSO) to establish 

safety performance targets. 

For support on safety performance management and target setting, Louisiana Department of Transportation 

and Development (LA DOTD) works with the Highway Safety Research Group (HSRG) at Louisiana State 

University. HSRG has developed several web-based dashboards to support the SHSP, including one for target 

setting. The dashboard calculates five year averages and shows how they compare to the Strategic Highway 

Safety Plan (SHSP) goal, which is halving fatalities by 2030. It also calculates a linear trend forecast. It is 

possible to filter the data in the target setting dashboard by the nine Regional Safety Coalitions established to 

implement the SHSP. Each regional coalition has its own SHSP safety goal, which is a proportion of the total 

State SHSP goal. Coalitions can use the dashboard to look at trend lines. Given that the regional safety 

coalitions represent larger areas than the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) and already have their 

own strategic goals related to the SHSP, participants noted it may be confusing for the MPOs to set additional 

safety targets.

For annual performance targets the Louisiana Highway Safety Commission (LHSC) has used three and fiveyear average linear trends to set targets. Generally they have used three-year averages, which has better Rsquared values indicating how well the trend line fit the data. For some emphasis areas, such as nonmotorized crashes, they have chosen a target of maintenance of the same value. In the future LHSC targets 

for the common measures will need to be set using five-year rolling averages to be in alignment with the 

FHWA rule and so LADOTD/SHSO targets will be identical.

LA DOTD and LHSC have been working together for the past several years to obtain agreement on targets. 

They have reviewed trends using three and five year averages and chosen targets based on the trend line that 

seems most reasonable based on the R-squared and the annual percentage reduction required to meet the 

target. Louisiana has an SHSP Implementation team, which meets twice per year. The group met in 2018 and 

agreed on safety targets for the required performance measures.

According to the Planning Final Rule (Statewide and Nonmetropolitan Transportation Planning; Metropolitan 

Transportation Planning Final Rule issued May 27, 2016) Metropolitan Transportation Plans (MTPs) will need 

to discuss how the plan will achieve safety targets. The MPOs Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 

the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) also must discuss how they will achieve targets. 

Every MTP update will include development of a System Performance Report, which will state what targets are 

and whether the region achieved targets.

Safety performance management happens annually. However for other performance measures it will not be 

reported annually.

The review of MPO target achievement will be part of FHWA planning process reviews. Any needed changes 

will happen within the planning process review. There is no consequence for MPOs in the Federal legislation. 

MPOs will report their targets (either targets specific to the region or support of the five State safety targets, or 

a combination of the two) to the LA DOTD. A method for reporting to the State DOT is not prescribed. The LA 

DOTD needs to determine how that will happen. For example, reporting could take the form of MPO minutes 

that are copied to the LA DOTD or letter from MPO Executive director to LA DOTD.

Does the State want to report additional optional targets? 

No
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 48 of 59

Describe progress toward meeting the State’s 2018 Safety Performance Targets (based 

on data available at the time of reporting). For each target, include a discussion of any 

reasons for differences in the actual outcomes and targets. 

Fatalities

Louisiana did not achieve the 2018 safety performance target for total fatalities. This is primarily attributed to a 

rise in non-motorized user fatalities despite ongoing efforts to improve safety infrastructure and promote 

awareness for non-motorized users. Louisiana observed motor vehicle occupant fatalities down to a sevenyear low in 2018 while pedestrian fatalities increased 43%, to the highest level observed in modern times. Had 

Louisiana made any significant progress in reducing pedestrian fatalities, the 2018 target would have easily 

been achieved. Moving forward, we will be looking at these user groups independently and adjusting our safety 

performance targets accordingly.

Suspected Serious Injury

Louisiana has achieved the 2018 safety performance target for suspected serious injury. This is the result of a 

nearly 5% decrease in suspected serious injuries across the state from 2017 to 2018, thanks to ongoing 

infrastructure, enforcement, and education activities. In 2019, Louisiana updated its definition of serious injury 

to conform with the Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria Guideline and thus it is expected that Louisiana 

suspected serious injuries will increase to a number of instances closer to what was observed in 2017 due to 

the new definition encompassing a wider type of injury than the previous definition. 

Fatality Rate

Louisiana did not achieve the 2018 safety performance target for total fatality rate despite an increase in 

vehicle miles traveled across the state. This is primarily attributed to a rise in non-motorized user fatalities 

despite ongoing efforts to improve safety infrastructure and promote awareness for non-motorized users. 

Louisiana observed motor vehicle occupant fatality rate down to a seven-year low in 2018 while pedestrian 

fatalities increased 43%, to the highest level observed in modern times. Had Louisiana made progress in 

reducing pedestrian fatalities, the 2018 fatality rate target would have been achieved. Moving forward, we will 

be looking at these user groups independently and adjusting our safety performance targets accordingly.

Suspected Serious Injury Rate

Louisiana has achieved the 2018 safety performance target for suspected serious injury rate. This is the result 

of a nearly 5% decrease in suspected serious injuries across the state from 2017 to 2018 coupled with an 

increase in vehicle miles traveled over the same period. This can be attributed to ongoing infrastructure, 

enforcement, and education activities throughout the state. In 2019, Louisiana updated its definition of serious 

injury to conform with the Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria Guideline and thus it is expected that 

Louisiana suspected serious injuries will increase to a number of instances closer to what was observed in 

2017 due to the new definition encompassing a wider type of injury than the previous definition. 

Non-motorized Fatalities & Suspected Serious Injuries

Louisiana did not achieve the 2018 safety performance target for non-motorized fatalities and suspected 

serious injuries. This is primarily attributed to a 43% increase in pedestrian fatalities from 2017 to 2018 despite 

ongoing efforts to improve safety infrastructure and promote awareness for non-motorized users. Additionally 

bicyclist fatalities increased 29%, pedestrian suspected serious injuries were up 9%, while bicyclist suspected 

serious injuries have been steady from 2016-2018 despite a significant decrease in total suspected serious 

injuries in 2018. Louisiana needs to continue making major investments to non-motorized user infrastructure 

and improve safety culture to make significant progress towards improving transportation safety for these user 

groups. 
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 49 of 59

Applicability of Special Rules

Does the HRRR special rule apply to the State for this reporting period? 

Yes

Provide the number of older driver and pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries 65 

years of age and older for the past seven years. 

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Fatalities

70 65 67 84 75 78 94

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Serious 

Injuries

69 86 71 89 90 89 82

FARS data was used for fatalities
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 50 of 59

Evaluation

Program Effectiveness

How does the State measure effectiveness of the HSIP? 

• Change in fatalities and serious injuries

• Other-Change in all crashes at locations in the HSIP

Based on the measures of effectiveness selected previously, describe the results of 

the State's program level evaluations. 

Based on 2018 statewide crash data, we have observed a decline in motor vehicle occupant fatalities and 

serious injuries. We believe this is due to our focus on roadway departure projects. However, we have seen a 

significant increase in pedestrian and bicycle fatalities. We have initiated a crash data assessment on nonmotorized users over the last 5 years to gain insight into potential causes and strategies to address this.

Also, before/after crash rate evaluations were calculated for fourteen completed HSIP Safety Projects with 

Final Inspection dates in 2015. The fourteen projects were broken down into 24 sites; 7 intersections and 17 

segments. Overall, we saw a crash rate reduction of 6% for these projects.

What other indicators of success does the State use to demonstrate effectiveness and 

success of the Highway Safety Improvement Program? 

• HSIP Obligations

• Increased awareness of safety and data-driven process

• Increased focus on local road safety

• More systemic programs

• Policy change

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements

Present and describe trends in SHSP emphasis area performance measures. 

Year 2018

SHSP Emphasis 

Area

Targeted Crash 

Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury 

Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Other-Impaired 

Driving

330 308 0.67 0.63

Other-Distracted 

Driving

65 176.6 0.13 0.35

Occupant 

Protection

277.2 234 0.53 0.48

Infrastructure and 

OperationsIntersections

154.8 502.8 0.44 0.9
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 51 of 59

SHSP Emphasis 

Area

Targeted Crash 

Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury 

Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Young Drivers 196.8 416.4 0.4 0.85

Infrastructure and 

OperationsRoadway 

Departure

456.6 571.4 0.93 1.17
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 52 of 59

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 53 of 59

Has the State completed any countermeasure effectiveness evaluations during the 

reporting period? 

No

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 54 of 59

Project Effectiveness

Provide the following information for previously implemented projects that the State evaluated this reporting period. 

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

BEFORE

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

na
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 55 of 59

Compliance Assessment

What date was the State’s current SHSP approved by the Governor or designated State representative? 

 07/27/2017

What are the years being covered by the current SHSP? 

From: 2017 To: 2021

When does the State anticipate completing it’s next SHSP update? 

 2022

Provide the current status (percent complete) of MIRE fundamental data elements collection efforts using the table below. 

ROAD TYPE MIRE NAME 

(MIRE NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

ROADWAY 

SEGMENT

Segment Identifier 

(12)

100 100 100 100 100 100

Route Number (8) 100 100

Route/Street Name 

(9)

100 100

Federal Aid/Route 

Type (21)

100 100

Rural/Urban 

Designation (20)

100 100 100 100

Surface Type (23) 100 100

Begin Point 

Segment 

Descriptor (10)

100 100 100 100 100 100

End Point Segment 

Descriptor (11)

100 100 100 100 100 100

Segment Length 

(13)

100 100

Direction of 

Inventory (18)

100 100

Functional Class 

(19)

100 100 100 100 100 100

Median Type (54) 100

Access Control 

(22)

100
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 56 of 59

ROAD TYPE MIRE NAME 

(MIRE NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

One/Two Way 

Operations (91)

100 100

Number of Through 

Lanes (31)

100 100

Average Annual 

Daily Traffic (79)

75 5 75 5

AADT Year (80) 75 5

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4)

100 100 100 100 100 100

INTERSECTION Unique Junction 

Identifier (120)

Location Identifier 

for Road 1 

Crossing Point 

(122)

Location Identifier 

for Road 2 

Crossing Point 

(123)

Intersection/Juncti

on Geometry (126)

100

Intersection/Juncti

on Traffic Control 

(131)

100

AADT for Each 

Intersecting Road 

(79)

75 5

AADT Year (80) 75 5

Unique Approach 

Identifier (139)

INTERCHANGE/R

AMP

Unique 

Interchange 

Identifier (178)

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (197)

100 100

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

100 100
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 57 of 59

ROAD TYPE MIRE NAME 

(MIRE NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Ending Ramp 

Terminal (201)

Ramp Length (187) 100 100

Roadway Type at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (195)

100 100

Roadway Type at 

End Ramp 

Terminal (199)

100 100

Interchange Type 

(182)

Ramp AADT (191) 10

Year of Ramp 

AADT (192)

10

Functional Class 

(19)

100 100

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4)

100 100

Totals (Average Percent Complete): 97.22 67.22 43.75 1.25 65.45 63.64 97.22 67.22 100.00 100.00

*Based on Functional Classification

Describe actions the State will take moving forward to meet the requirement to have complete access to the MIRE fundamental data elements on all public roads by September 30, 2026. 

Between 2012 and 2016, DOTD collected roadway attribute data for all public roads including those that are locally classified. This process involved the use of a Data Collection Vehicle that captured video imagery. MIRE FDEs that could 

be captured from video were included in the data delivery. The raw data has been made available to local agencies as DOTD develops methods to maintain the road centerline and attribute data that are not owned by the State. During 

this time frame, an Enterprise GIS system is being implemented in order to manage and properly distribute the data using an established Linear Reference System. DOTD is piloting an effort with the Acadiana Planning Commission to 

establish standards and protocols for obtaining updates from local agencies. This includes developing a data dictionary, complete with schema and domain values. The raw attribute data for the non-state system is currently being 

translated to include the Linear Reference System established by the Enterprise GIS. Once complete and loaded into the Enterprise, DOTD will have the ability to publish GIS data and maps that can be shared and used for collaboration 

purposes.

Items outside of the collection scope include traffic volume information as well as unique identifiers for intersection attributes. While DOTD has an extensive Traffic Monitoring Program for State Highways, it continues to study the use of 

vehicle probe data in order to acquire complete AADT coverage on locally classified roads. Additional efforts are underway within GIS to establish intersection identification and create unique identifiers for attaching related data items.

Did the State conduct an HSIP program assessment during the reporting period? 

No

When does the State plan to complete its next HSIP program assessment.

2020
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 58 of 59

Optional Attachments

Program Structure:

2018 SRTPPP Application.docx

LRSP_2018_Project_Application.docx

13.docx

2016_LRSP App_ Jan.pdf

2018 Safe Routes to Public Places Program Evaluation and Selection Policy.pdf

2018 Safe Routes to Public Places Program Guidelines.pdf

2018 SRTPPP Project Application Evaluation Form HSIPPEN.xlsx

LRSP 2018 Application Evaluation Form.xlsx

LRSP 2018 Guidelines & Policies.docx

FINAL_REVISED_HSIP Infrastructure State Routes Project Selection Guide v17_REV.pdf

Project Implementation:

Safety Performance:

Evaluation:

Compliance Assessment:
2019 Louisiana Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 59 of 59

Glossary

5 year rolling average: means the average of five individuals, consecutive annual points of data 

(e.g. annual fatality rate).

Emphasis area: means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process.

Highway safety improvement project: means strategies, activities and projects on a public road 

that are consistent with a State strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous 

road location or feature or addresses a highway safety problem.

HMVMT: means hundred million vehicle miles traveled.

Non-infrastructure projects: are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of noninfrastructure projects include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, 

improvements in the collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement 

activities.

Older driver special rule: applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and 

pedestrians over the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which 

data are available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance 

dated February 13, 2013.

Performance measure: means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to 

monitor changes in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and 

objectives.

Programmed funds: mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects.

Roadway Functional Classification: means the process by which streets and highways are 

grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP): means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on 

safety data developed by a State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148.

Systematic: refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across 

a system.

Systemic safety improvement: means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high 

risk roadway features that are correlated with specific severe crash types.

Transfer: means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal 

year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.