alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27108]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee Cancellation of Open 
Committee Meeting

    According to the provisions of section 10 of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given that the meeting 
of the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee scheduled for 
Thursday, October 23, 1997, has been canceled.
    Information on other meetings can be obtained by contacting the 
Committee's Secretary, Office of Personnel Management, Federal 
Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee, Room 5559, 1900 E Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-1500.

    Dated: October 6, 1997.
Phyllis G. Heuerman,
Chair, Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 97-27108 Filed 10-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M
Exhibit 12.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Carlos Aguirre Gomez, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Grupo Radio Centro,
S.A. de C.V.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
      by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
      to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

      5. The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal
      control over financial reporting.

Date: July 1, 2004

                                           /s/ Carlos Aguirre Gomez
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Carlos Aguirre Gomez
                                           General Director
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 2 Plaintiff-Appellee, 3

v. No. 36,145 4 CHRISTOPHER MALDONADO, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY 7 Fernando R. Macias, District Judge 8 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender 12 Kathleen T. Baldridge, Assistant Appellate Defender 13 Santa Fe, NM 14 for Appellant 15

MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 HANISEE Judge. 172 {1} Defendant has appealed hi s conviction for tampering with evidence. We issued 1 a notice of proposed summary disposition inwhich we proposed to affirm. Defendant 2 has filed a memorandum in opposition, which we have duly considered. Because we 3 remain unpersuaded, we affirm. 4
{2} We previously described the pertinent background and applicable principles of 5 law in the notice of propos ed summary disposition. Wewill avoid undue repetition 6 here. Instead, we will focus on the content of the memorandum in opposition. 7
{3} Defendant continues to ch allenge the sufficiency of the evidence. [MIO 3-7] 8 However, as we previously observed, the testimony of Mr. Ruther and the law 9 enforcement officers who responded to the scene, together with Defendant’s 10 admission to having placed the knife under the sink in order to avoid law enforcement 11 suspicion that he had assaulted his landlord, is sufficient to establish all of the 12 essential elements. [DS 2-3; MIO 1-2] See generally NMSA 1978, § 30-22-5(A) 13 (2003) (prohibiting tampering with evidence); UJI 14-2241 NMRA (defining the 14 elements of the offense). 15
{4} In his memorandum in opposition Defendant contends that the element of the 16 offense which requires specific intent to prevent prosecution should be deemed 17 unsatisfied, because he acted with the intent to prevent the officers from believing that 18 he had committed an offense for which he was ultimately acquitted. [MIO 5-6] 193 However, the statute prohibits the hiding of evidence with the intent to prevent 1 prosecution , not conviction. See id. Moreover, as we observed in the notice of 2 proposed summary disposition, Defendant’s acquittal of the underlying charge of 3 aggravated assault with a deadly weapon does not undermine the validity of the 4 conviction for tampering. See State v. Alvarado , 2012-NMCA-089, ¶ 8, ___ P.3d ___ 5 (observing that “a defendant need not be convicted of the underlying crime to be 6 convicted of tampering with evidence of that crime”). 7
{5} Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed summary 8 disposition and above, we affirm. 9
{6} IT IS SO ORDERED. 10

11 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 12 WE CONCUR: 13

14 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 15

16 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 17
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
     Statements: Form S-8 No. 33-67076 and Form S-8 No. 33-87630 pertaining to
     the BroadBand Technologies, Inc. 1988 Incentive Stock Option Plan; Form S-8
     No. 33-67724 pertaining to the BroadBand Technologies, Inc. 1992
     Nonqualified Stock Option Plan; Form S-8 No. 33-73802 pertaining to the
     BroadBand Technologies, Inc. 401 (k) Plan; Form S-8 No. 333-09661
     pertaining to the BroadBand Technologies, Inc. 5% Convertible Subordinated
     Notes due May 15, 2001 and Form S-8 No. 333-10443 pertaining to the
     BroadBand Technologies, Inc. 1,000,000 shares of common stock issuable upon
     exercise of outstanding warrants of our report dated January 25, 1999 with
     respect to the financial statements of BroadBand Technologies, Inc.
     included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
     1998.




                                                           /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                           ---------------------
                                                               Ernst & Young LLP


Raleigh, North Carolina
March 26, 1999
1 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Index for 

[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0955] 

Revisions to Title V Operating Permits Programs, 

State of California, Five Air Pollution Control Districts

Docket Index 

Category/ Item Number

I. Title V Program Revision Submittal Documents for South Coast AQMD

ß Title V program revision submittal from CARB, dated August 19, 2011 I-A 

ß SCAQMD Rule 3000 - Clean Copy I-B 

ß SCAQMD Rule 3000 - Strikeout Copy I-C 

ß SCAQMD Rule 3001 - Clean Copy I-D 

ß SCAQMD Rule 3001 - Strikeout Copy I-E 

ß SCAQMD Rule 3002 - Clean Copy I-F 

ß SCAQMD Rule 3002 - Strikeout Copy I-G 

ß SCAQMD Rule 3003 - Clean Copy I-H 

ß SCAQMD Rule 3003 - Strikeout Copy I-I 

ß SCAQMD Rule 3005 - Clean Copy I-J 

ß SCAQMD Rule 3005 - Strikeout Copy I-K 

ß SCAQMD Rule 3006 - Clean Copy I-L 

ß SCAQMD Rule 3006 - Strikeout Copy I-M 

ß SCAQMD Final Staff Report, October, 2010 I-N 

II. Title V Program Revision Submittal Documents for San Luis Obispo County APCD

ß Title V program revision submittal from CARB, dated August 19, 2011 II-A 

ß SLOCAPCD Rule 216 - Clean Copy II-B 

ß SLOCAPCD Rule 216 - Strikeout Copy II-C 

ß SLOCAPCD Final Staff Report (undated) II-D 

III. Title V Program Revision Submittal Documents for Ventura County APCD

ß Title V program revision submittal from CARB, dated August 19, 2011 III-A 

ß VCAPCD Rule 33 - Clean Copy III-B 

ß VCAPCD Rule 33 - Strikeout Copy III-C 

ß VCAPCD Rule 33.1 - Clean Copy III-D 

ß VCAPCD Rule 33.1- Strikeout Copy III-E 
2 

ß VCAPCD Final Staff Report, February 25, 2011 III-F 

IV. Title V Program Revision Submittal Documents for Monterey Bay Unified APCD

ß Title V program revision submittal from CARB, dated November 7, 2011 IV-A 

ß MBUAPCD Rule 218 - Clean Copy IV-B 

ß MBUAPCD Rule 218 - Strikeout Copy IV-C 

ß MBUAPCD Final Staff Report (undated) IV-D 

V. Title V Program Revision Submittal Documents for Santa Barbara County APCD

ß Title V program revision submittal from CARB, dated April 21, 2011 V-A 

ß SBCAPCD Rule 1301 - Clean Copy V-B 

ß SBCAPCD Rule 1301 - Strikeout Copy V-C 

ß SBCAPCD Final Staff Report, January 20, 2011 V-D 

VI. Federal Register Notices

ß Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0955 

77 FR 16509 (March 21, 2012) 

ß Notice of Final Rulemaking, EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0955 

77 FR 54382 (September 5, 2012) 

VI-A 

VI-B
Exhibit 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.



|                              |  |                                              
|----------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Subsidiary                    |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|ATIII LLC                     |  | Delaware                                     
|GTC Securities Corporation    |  | Massachusetts                                
|GTC Japan Limited             |  | Japan                                        
|GTC Holding Ltd.              |  | Cayman Islands                               
|TSI Corporation               |  | Delaware                                     
|Taurus hSa LLC                |  | Delaware                                     
|GTC NZ Limited                |  | New Zealand                                  
|GTC Biotherapeutics U.K. Ltd. |  | United Kingdom
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2747 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2747

   To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to extend the 
     Administrative Fine Program for certain reporting violations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 7, 2023

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mrs. Fischer) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to extend the 
     Administrative Fine Program for certain reporting violations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE FINE PROGRAM.

    Section 309(a)(4)(C)(v) of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 
1971 (52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(4)(C)(v)) is amended by striking ``December 
31, 2023'' and inserting ``December 31, 2033''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Michael BRUNNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-374.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 21, 1970.

Harry W. Fogle, of Fogle & Wilson, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of State v. Hayles (Supreme Court of Florida) 240 So.2d 1 filed September 30, 1970.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27616]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

[CA-350-1230-00]


Notice of Intent To Prepare Land Use Plan Amendment

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, Eagle 
Lake Resource Area, California.

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of Intent to Prepare a Land Use Plan 
Amendment for the Fort Sage OHV Area. The planning process to date 
included scoping, a public meeting and development of an Environmental 
Assessment for revised OHV designations. This Notice of Intent is 
specifically to amend the Honey Lake/Beckwourth Management Framework 
Plan of 1976.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Scoping commended on May 20, 1996. A public 
meeting was held June 12, 1996 in Susanville, California. All comments 
received since scoping commenced and during the public meetings, are 
being considered in this process.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Honey Lake/Beckwourth Management 
Framework Plan is in the area of the Northwest Great Basin in 
Southeastern Lassen County, California. The scoping, and public 
participation covers the whole of the Fort Sage OHV Area. This draft 
plan amendment for the Honey Lake/Beckwourth Management Framework Plan 
is scheduled for completion in late December, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR RELATED DOCUMENTS CONTACT: Linda Hansen, 
Area Manager, Eagle Lake Resource Area, 2950 Riverside Drive, 
Susanville, California 96130. Telephone: (916) 257-0456.
Linda Hansen,
Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-27616 Filed 10-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


National N-Viro Tech., Inc. (Ohio)
Midwest N-Viro, Inc. (Illinois)
Tennessee-Carolina N-Viro, Inc. (Tennessee)
N-Viro Soil South, Inc. (Florida)
N-Viro Honolulu, Inc. (Hawaii)
Pan-American N-Viro, Inc. (Delaware)
BioCheck Laboratories, Inc.* (Ohio)
American N-Viro Resources, Inc. (Ohio)


*Assets were sold April 1, 1996 but the entity was never dissolved.



                                       31
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26843]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering & Environmental Systems; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Bioengineering & Environmental 
Systems (1189)
    Date and Time: November 4, 1997; 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 
360, Arlington, VA
    Contact Person: Dr. A. Fred Thompson, Program Director, 
Environmental Technology Program, Division of Bioengineering & 
Environmental Systems, Room 565, NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, 
VA 22230 703/306-1318.
    Purpose of Meeting:  To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Environmental Technology CAREER 
proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 6, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26843 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TransDigm Holding
Company (the Company) for the thirteen weeks ended December 27, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory Rufus, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the
Company for the periods indicated.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 3, 2004



/s/ Gregory RufusTitle:

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




38
#### J. B. KIRKPATRICK, Jr., Appellant, v. J. R. BRIDGES, Appellee.

No. 71-137.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 7, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4392

_____________________________

A. F-K.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County.

William W. Blue, Judge.

March 22, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Jasmine Quintera Russell, 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
##### 



EXHIBIT 11
AGEMARK CORPORATION

STATEMENT CONCERNING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

|                                                      |  |                            |           |      |  |  |           | 
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | --------- | ---- |  |  | --------- | 
|                                                      |  | Six Months Ended March 31,
|                                                      |  |                           
|                                                      |  | 2002                       |           | 2001
|                                                      |  |                            |           |     
|Common shares outstanding, beginning of period        |  |                            | 1,000,000 |      |  |  | 1,000,000 | 
|                                                     
|                                                     
|                                                     
|                                                     
|Shares cancelled due to inability to contact, 10/1/01 |  |                            | -54,393   |      |  |  |           | 
|                                                     
|                                                     
|                                                     
|                                                     
|Weighted average common shares outstanding for period |  |                            | 945,607   |      |  |  | 1,000,000 | 

1) Shares attributable to vested stock options are anti-dilutive
#### Harry KAPLAN, Appellant, v. John STURM, Appellee.

No. 39813.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 14, 1970.

Certiorari dismissed. 234 So.2d 390.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and SAMUEL S. SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

		NO. 2-05-029-CV

CARPETON MILLS, INC.	APPELLANT

	V.

SKEET HOOKS AND WIFE,	APPELLEES

LINDA HOOKS, D/B/A FLOORS						

AND WINDOWS PLUS

	------------

	FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant’s “Unopposed Motion To Dismiss.”  It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM	

PANEL D:	LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 3, 2005
#### Nancy SYMONS, Appellant, v. Ralph SYMONS, Appellee.

No. 69-497.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 10, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
      32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO
 18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
 
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Key Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John J. Ehren,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
   (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/  John J.
Ehren
 John J.
Ehren
 Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 December
11, 2009