alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

BRYAN POULIN, I 

Petitioner, 1 Civil Action No. 04-350 Erie 

WARDEN, F.C.I. IWcKEAN, \ 

Respondent. I 

MEMORANDUMORDER 

This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on 

December 3, 2004 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise 

Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(I), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on April 13, 2006, 

recorr~mends that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. The parties were 

allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on 

Petitioner by certified mail at FCI McKean, where he is incarcerated. Petitioner has 

filed no objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report and Recommendation. After & 

novo review' of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and 

Recommendation, the following order is entered: 

AND NOW, this gth day of May, 2006, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is 

DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on 

April 1 3, 2006 [Doc. # 101, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. 

sl Sean J. McLaughlin Ur~ited States District Judge 

cm: All parties of record 

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:04-cv-00350-SJM-SPB Document 11 Filed 05/09/06 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 12.1**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I, Miguel Galuccio, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of YPF S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: April 26, 2013.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2013

p0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2013

147304

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147304

COA: 308407

Wayne CC: 11-005434-FH

JAMES LAWRENCE QUINNEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 28, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5273-5274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2695]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[STB Docket No. AB-227 (Sub-No. 7X)]


Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Company--Abandonment Exemption--in 
Wyandot County, OH

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board, under 49 U.S.C. 10502, exempts from the prior 
approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10903 the abandonment by the 
Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Company of its 2.3-mile Carey Spur line 
between milepost 55.3 and milepost 53.0 near Carey, in Wyandot County, 
OH, subject to labor protective conditions and an environmental 
condition.

DATES: Provided no formal expression of intent to file an offer of 
financial assistance (OFA) has been received, this exemption will be 
effective on March 6, 1997. Formal expressions of intent to file an OFA 
<SUP>1 under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2) and requests for interim trail use/
rail banking under 49 CFR 1152.29 must be filed by February 14, 1997; 
petitions to stay must be filed by February 19, 1997; requests for a 
public use condition under 49 CFR 1152.28 must be filed by February 24, 
1997; and petitions to reopen must be filed by March 3, 1997.

    \1\  See Exempt. of Rail Abandonment--Offers of Finan. Assist., 
4 I.C.C.2d 164 (1987).

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings referring to STB Docket No. AB-227 (Sub-No. 
7X): (1) Office of the Secretary, Case Control

[[Page 5274]]

Branch, Surface Transportation Board, 1201 Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423, and (2) William C. Sippel, Oppenheimer Wolff & 
Donnelly, Two Prudential Plaza, 45th Floor, 180 North Stetson Avenue, 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chicago, IL 60601.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 927-5660. 
[TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: DC News & Data, Inc., Room 2229, 1201 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-
4357/4359. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through 
TDD services (202) 927-5721.]

    Decided: January 23, 1997.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2695 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

AMOS TATE, )

Plaintiff, )

 )

V. ) Civil Action 05-175 Erie

 )

MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ERIE, PA et. al., )

Defendants.

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2006, upon consideration of the Defendants 

Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 17)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the same be and hereby is GRANTED.

By way of brief background a status conference was previously scheduled on November 29,

2005, and plaintiff failed to appear despite notice. The plaintiff failed to perfect service on

defendant Magistrate Sue Mack, and said defendant was dismissed by order of court dated April

4, 2006. On April 4, 2006, defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgement with Supporting

Brief. Thereafter, this court entered an order dated April 4, 2006 which stated in relevant part:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff file a 

Brief in Opposition to this Motion on or before 

April 17, 2006. Failure to comply with this Order 

will result in the dismissal of this action for 

failure to prosecute.

The plaintiff has failed to file a response to the defendants Motion for Summary Judgment.

The court concludes that dismissal is appropriate for failure to prosecute. The

Plaintiff is personally responsible for his inactivity on this case. The defendants are prejudiced

by plaintiffs failure and the plaintiff has demonstrated a history of non compliance with court

orders. It would appear that the conduct is willful and the Court can think of no other sanction

that would be effective other then dismissal. Finally, the Court does not find the plaintiffs claim

to be meritorious. Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 747F2d 863,868 (3d Cir.1984).

The Clerk is directed to mark this case closed.

 s/Sean J. McLaughlin 

SEAN J. MCLAUGHLIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: parties of record

Case 1:05-cv-00175-SJM Document 22 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                     REMOTE DYNAMICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Remote Dynamics, Inc. (the "Company"),
on Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis R. Casey,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Dennis R. Casey
--------------------------
Dennis R. Casey
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
November 15, 2004
*	CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS HAVE BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY 
WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A 
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUEST.


January 8, 1997
Our Ref: B96-7701-RJTL-RJ0350-012

Atlantic Coast Airlines
1 Export Drive, 
Sterling, Virginia,
U.S.A. 20164


Gentlemen,

Letter Agreement No. 012 to Purchase Agreement No. RJ-0350 dated January 
8, 1997 (the "Agreement" between Bombardier Inc. ("BRAD") and Atlantic 
Coast Airlines ("Buyer") relating to the purchase of twelve (12) 
Canadair Regional Jet Aircraft (the "Aircraft")

Subject:		Marketing Support

1.0	This letter constitutes an integral part of the Agreement and 
evidences our further agreement with the matters set forth below.  
All terms used herein and in the Agreement and not defined herein, 
shall have the same meaning as in the Agreement.

2.0	*



3.0	The provisions of this Letter Agreement are personal to Buyer and 
shall not be assigned or otherwise disposed of by Buyer except as 
part of an assignment of the Agreement expressly permitted under 
Article 20 of the Agreement.

4.0	This Letter Agreement constitutes an integral part of the 
Agreement and subject to the terms and conditions contained 
therein.

5.0	In the event of the Termination of the Agreement, this Letter 
Agreement shall become automatically null and void.
	

Should there be any inconsistency between this Letter Agreement and the 
Agreement with respect to the subject matter covered by the terms 
hereof, then this Letter Agreement shall prevail.


Yours very truly,
BOMBARDIER INC.



________________________				Date:_____________
Michel Bourgeois
Vice President, Contracts 





Acknowledged and Accepted


Atlantic Coast Airlines



________________________				Date:_____________
James B. Glennon
Sr. Vice President and C.F.O.


 

 
[Footnote continued from previous page]

[Footnote continued on next page]

2
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT M. BOURNE )

Plaintiff )

) C.A. No. 06-35 Erie

vs. ) District Judge Cohill

) Magistrate Judge Baxter

LANCASTER NEWSPAPER INC. )

Defendant. )

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

I. REPORT

It is respectfully recommended that this action be transferred to the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 

The Report and Recommendation issued February 24, 2006 is hereby withdrawn.

II. RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Robert Bourne, presently incarcerated at the Lancaster County Prison in

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, brings this action pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims

that Defendant violated his civil rights by maliciously slandering him and defaming his

character. In addition to his complaint, Plaintiff has filed a motion to proceed in forma

pauperis. 

Title 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) provides that “for the convenience of the parties and witnesses,

in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or

division where it might have been brought.” 

Title 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) provides that venue is proper in civil rights actions in (1) a

judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same state, (2) a

judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim

occurred. In this case, Defendant is not located within this District and the act of defamation is

not alleged to have occurred within this District. This Court also notes that Plaintiff is not

Case 1:06-cv-00035-MBC-SPB Document 4 Filed 04/12/06 Page 1 of 2
2

incarcerated within this District. 

For the convenience of the parties, this Court recommends that this case be transferred to

the Eastern District.

III. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, this case be transferred to the United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 

The Report and Recommendation issued February 24, 2006 is hereby withdrawn.

In accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule

72.1.4(B) of the Local Rules for Magistrates, the parties are allowed ten days from the date of

service to file objections to this Report and Recommendation. 

S/ Susan Paradise Baxter 

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: April 11, 2006

Case 1:06-cv-00035-MBC-SPB Document 4 Filed 04/12/06 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26718]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CO-930-1430-01; COC-60906]


Proposed Withdrawal; Opportunity for Public Meeting; Colorado

September 30, 1997.
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management proposes to withdraw 
approximately 129.8 acres of public lands for 20 years to protect three 
recreation sites. This notice closes these lands to operation of the 
public land laws including location and entry under the mining laws for 
up to two years. The lands have been and remain open to mineral 
leasing.

DATES: Comments on this proposed withdrawal or requests for public 
meeting must be received on or before January 7, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments and requests for a meeting should be sent to the 
Colorado State Director, BLM, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, 
Colorado 80215-7076.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris E. Chelius, 303-239-3706.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 26, 1997, a petition was 
approved allowing the Bureau of Land Management to file an application 
to withdraw the following described public lands from settlement, sale, 
location, or entry under the general land laws, including the mining 
laws, subject to valid existing rights:

Sixth Principal Meridian

 Mud Springs

T. 13 S., R. 102 W.,
    Sec. 24, S\1/2\NW\1/4\SE\1/4\ and N\1/2\SW\1/4\SE\1/4\.

Dominguez

T. 15 S., R. 100 W.,
    Sec. 15, SW\1/4\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\, SE\1/4\NW\1/4\SE\1/4\, NE\1/
4\SW\1/4\SE\1/4\, and NW\1/4\SE\1/4\SE\1/4\

Miracle Rock

T. 12 S., R. 103 W.,
    Sec. 26, West 10 chains of Lot 3, and that portion of the SE\1/
4\SW\1/4\ within acquired parcel C-832;
    Sec. 35, West 10 chains of Lot 2, and that portion of the NE\1/
4\NW\1/4\ within acquired parcel C-832.

    The areas described aggregate approximately 129.8 acres in Mesa 
County.

    For a period of 90 days from the date of publication of this 
notice, all parties who wish to submit comments, suggestions, or 
objections in connection with this proposed action, or to request a 
public meeting, may present their views in writing to the Colorado 
State Director. If the authorized officer determines that a meeting 
should be held, the meeting will be scheduled and conducted in 
accordance with 43 CFR 2310.3-1(c)(2)).
    This application will be processed in accordance with the 
regulations set forth in 43 CFR part 2310.

    For a period of two years from the date of publication in the 
Federal Register, these lands will be segregated as specified above 
unless the application is denied or cancelled or the withdrawal is 
approved prior to that date. During this period the Bureau of Land 
Management will continue to manage this land.
Jenny L. Saunders,
Realty Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26718 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-M
#### Mettie Lee FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40392.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 28, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 239 So. 2d 630. ,

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
0601061 CHICKEN_BRO 1/18/06 4:19 PM Page 9

DICCIONARIO
DICTIONARY

TIEMPO DE REACCION REACTION TIME

Cuando usted bebe alcohol tarda mas tiempo en reac-
cionar. Quiza no pueda evitar—o incluso ver—un coche.
When you drink alcohol, you take longer to react. You
might not be able to avoid—or even see—a car.

MEDICACION MEDICATION

No beba si ha tomado cualquier tipo de medica-
eI = mento. Algunos medicamentos reaccionan
x negativamente con el alcohol. Otros medicamentos
pueden aumentar los efectos del alcohol.
Do not drink if you've taken any kind of medication.
Some medications react badly with alcohol. Other
medications might increase the effects of alcohol.

AMIGO FRIEND

Si ha estado bebiendo, no camine a casa
solo, es mejor ir acompafiado por un amigo
que esté sobrio. Por lo que pueda pasar.

If you have been drinking, don’t walk home
alone. It's better to have a sober friend
nearby. Just in case.

Cada siete minutos

un peaton muere 0 es
gravemente herido en
un accidente de trafico.
Casi la mitad de ellos
se encuentra bajo la

eee ne Tres ruwa-sa-05-018 Wid Gham Pai esis influencia del alcohol.



CHICKEN_BRO 1/18/06 4:19 PM Page 10 ©

ALCOHOL AFFECTS ALCOHOL AFFECTS HOW YOU THINK
HOW YOU MOVE — animpact on yourjudgment.
Drinking impairs your ability to walk, cycle, and drive. ; ‘ ALCOHOL AFECTA
ccna. ao [9M on
= © USTED PIENSA
USTED SE MUEVE #

La bebida disminuye su
habilidad para caminar, montar
en bicicleta, y conducir.

ALCOHOL AFFECTS
HOW YOU FEEL

Drinking creates a false

Incluso una pequefia cantidad
de alcohol tiene un gran
impacto en usted.

me DRINK WITH CAUTION

Almost half of the pedestrians
qaee killed or injured in crashes
were walking under the

sense of security. 4 influence of alcohol.

EL ALCOHOL AFECTA EL MODO EN BEBA CON PRECAUCION
QUE USTED SE SIENTE Casi la mitad de los peatones muertos o

gravemente heridos en accidentes de trafico se

La bebida crea una falsa sensaci6n de seguridad. encuentra bajo la influencia del alcohol.

—p—
EXHIBIT 10.7


                               DELTA MUTUAL, INC.
                       1730 Rhode Island Avenue, Suite 812
                             Washington, D.C. 20036
                                  203-820-4831

January 13, 2003

Martin & Associates
6723 Whittier
McLean, Virginia 22101

Dear Mr. Martin:

This shall serve as the agreement by and between Delta Mutual, Inc., a Delaware
Corporation (the "Company") and Kenneth Martin of McLean, Virginia ( the
"Employee") to provide Employee with full compensation for its past services
rendered to the Company.

The Company acknowledges that the Employee has performed administrative and
corporate services, for and on behalf of the Company, in his role as chief
executive officer of the Company from April 2001 to the present. These services
have included bookkeeping, corporate administration, securities filings and
communications for and on behalf of the Company. All of these past services have
resulted in an outstanding Company debt due Employee in the approximate amount
of $15,OOO.00. Pursuant to our discussions, Employee has agreed to accept 30,000
restricted shares of the Company's common shares (the "Shares") 1n full payment
of the Company's debt. In addition and as further consideration for Employee's
agreement to accept the Shares as payment, the Company shall utilize its best
efforts to register the Shares for sale to the public by including them in a
Form S-8 registration statement that the Company shall file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933
Act"). The Company shall issue the Shares in your individual name and identity
you as the selling shareholder in the registration statement. Upon the filing of
this Form 8-8, we shall notify you of the date of its effectiveness and provide
you with the necessary copies of the prospectus to be used in any proposed sale
of the Shares.

Please indicate your agreement to the terms ser forth in this correspondence by
signing your name where indicated below, returning a signed copy to me at your
convenience.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Kenneth Martin
-------------------------------
DELTA MUTUAL, INC.
Kenneth Martin, President


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:
Kenneth Martin
By: /s/ Kenneth Martin
    ---------------------------
        Kenneth Martin