alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
March 5, 2012

Mr. Peter Borneman Helicopter Flight

2111 Smithtown Avenue Ronkonkoma, NY 11779

Dear Mr. Borneman:

This is in response to your February 13, 2012 letter (public docket No. FAA-2012-0165) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Helicopter Flight for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Fe deral Regulations (CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Helicopter Flight to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program while operating under separate parts of the regulation.

Our records indicate that Helicopter Flight is an active air tour operator (defined under § 91.147) with a Letter of Authorization (# HF XJ2111), and Aircraft Maintenance Specialists (AMS) is a contractor with an active registra tion (# CONN093A). As an air tour operator, Helicopter Flight is required to have an LOA and implement their program prior to the start of operations. As a contractor, AMS is not required to have a program; however, they may choose to implement a program on their own. Ultimately, the air tour operator has the option to include their AMS employees under a single program without an exemption. To do this, Helicopter Flight must request their contractor registration to be terminated by contacting the FAA’s Drug Abatement Division directly at (202) 267-8442 or drugabatement@faa.gov.2 Because the relief you seek is covered under 14 CFR part 120, and the exemption does not apply, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Rafael Ramos Manager, Drug Abatement Division

Enclosure
CONSENT OF MINISTER OF ECONOMY & FINANCE



 
EXHIBIT 4(8)








 
[Letterhead of
Ministry of Economy and Finance] 
 
February 13, 2003

 
CONSENT 
 
I, Norberto Delgado Durán, Minister of Economy and
Finance of the Republic of Panama, hereby consent to the reference to my name, in my official capacity, as the Minister of Economy and Finance under the caption “Official Statements” in the Prospectus included in this Registration
Statement of the Republic of Panama filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. 
 

	
	  	   	  /s/ Norberto Delgado Durán

  Norberto Delgado Durán
  Minister of
Economy and Finance
Case 05-90050-WWB Doc 20 Filed 12/27/05 Entered 12/27/05 15:26:33 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 2
Case 05-90050-WWB Doc 20 Filed 12/27/05 Entered 12/27/05 15:26:33 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: TELETRAC, INC.

, Relator. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 3

- 00 063

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS



### O R D E R

The Court has this day considered the Relator’s petition for writ o f mandamus and

is of the opinion that the case should be set for submission with out oral argument. A submission

date has not yet been determined. The parties will be provided with advanced notice of the

setting. S EE TEX

. R

. APP

. P

. 39.8.

IT IS SO ORDERE D THIS 31ST DAY OF MAY , 2013

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
#### Perry Furn GREENE, III, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-403.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 18, 1970.

Henry Clay Mitchell, Jr., Pensacola, and Brooks Taylor, Crestview, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Horace A. Knowlton, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed herein is affirmed on the authority of the decision rendered by this court in the companion case of Greene et al., v. State of Florida, Fla.App., 237 So.2d 46, which has this day been filed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON, and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20590 

January 22, 2020 

Access to Programs, Services, Information, and Technology 

Policy Statement 

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) will take appropriate steps to ensure equal access 

in compliance with Section 504 ofthe Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, which prohibits 

disability discrimination in any program or activity that receives Federal funds or is conducted 

by an executive agency. The DOT will ensure that persons with disabilities have access to all of 

its programs, services, activities, and information that is comparable to the access provided to 

persons without disabilities. 

Similarly, Section 508 of the Act requires that all electronic and information technology (EIT) 

purchased, developed, maintained, or used by DOT must meet the Section 508 accessibility 

standards for the public and employees. The DOT will comply with all statutory requirements so 

employees with disabilities have access to and use of EIT to perform their assigned duties. The 

accessibility and usability of EIT will be comparable for all employees, regardless of disability, 

unless an undue burden would be imposed on the Department. 

To achieve our organizational excellence goal, DOT must maintain an accessible work 

environment. This is crucial to ensuring that all individuals with the appropriate skills and 

talents have equal employment opportunities. Supervisors and managers should provide 

effective leadership to accomplish disability assessment goals. The Chief Information Officer, 

the Assistant Secretary for Administration, and the Director of the Departmental Office of Civil 

Rights are available to provide employees with policy guidance and technical assistance. 

Elaine L. Chao
TP 7245E

1 of 1 

AD Number: CF-2015-07

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued pursuant to Civil Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521.427. 

No person shall conduct a take-off or permit a take-off to be conducted in an aircraft that is in their legal 

custody and control, unless the requirements of CAR 605.84 pertaining to ADs are met. Standard 625 - 

Aircraft Equipment and Maintenance Standards Appendix H provides information concerning alternative 

means of compliance (AMOC) to ADs.

Number:

CF-2015-07

ATA:

27

Effective Date:

28 April 2015 

Type Certificate:

A-142

Subject: 

Flight Control System – Cracking of the Spoiler Power Control Unit

Applicability:

Bombardier Inc. model DHC-8-400 Series 401 and 402 aeroplanes, serial numbers 4001 and 4003 

through 4453, equipped with spoiler Power Control Unit (PCU) part number (P/N) 390700-1007 and -

1009, serial numbers 0474 through 1321 and 1394 through1876 without suffix ‘A’.

Compliance:

Within 12 000 hours air time or 72 months, whichever occurs first, from the effective date of this AD, 

unless already accomplished.

Background:

During endurance and impulse testing of the spoiler PCU, cracks were discovered on two test spoiler 

PCU manifolds. Investigation determined that the crack initiation was due to the heat treat process. A 

cracked spoiler PCU manifold could cause the loss of one of the two hydraulic systems, resulting in the 

loss of multiple flight controls and landing gear systems. This condition, if not corrected, could adversely 

affect the continued safe operation and landing of the aeroplane.

This AD mandates the replacement of the affected spoiler PCUs.

Corrective Actions:

Remove and replace the affected spoiler PCUs with the PCUs that have serial numbers outside the 

affected range as shown in the Applicability section of this AD or reworked PCUs with serial numbers that 

have suffix “A”. Bombardier Aerospace Service Bulletin (SB) 84-27-64, original issue, dated 15 July 2014, 

or later revisions approved by the Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada, provides approved 

instructions for replacing the spoiler PCUs.

Upon completion of SB 84-27-64, original issue, dated 15 July 2014 or later revisions, approved by the 

Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada, it is prohibited for anyone to install the spoiler PCUs 

P/N 390700-1007 and -1009, serial numbers 0474 through 1321 and 1394 through 1876 without suffix ‘A’.

Authorization:

For the Minister of Transport, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

Derek Ferguson

Chief, Continuing Airworthiness

Issued on 14 April 2015

Contact:

Gordanko Jeremic, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 613-996-9178 

or e-mail AD-CN@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sense Technologies
  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended August
  31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 21,
  2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
  dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
  his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: | October 21, 2003 | By: James H. Cotter                       
|----- | ---------------- | ------------------------------------------
|      |                  | James H. Cotter                           
|      |                  | President and Principal Accounting Officer

---
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 11
                               AGEMARK CORPORATION

             STATEMENT CONCERNING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                                         ------------------------------
                                                                           2001                 2000
                                                                         ---------            ---------
<S>                                                                      <C>                  <C>
Weighted average common shares actually outstanding                      1,000,000            1,000,000

Net shares assumed issued prior to the period attributable to              191,584              187,987
  stock options issued prior to the period

Net shares attributable to options ceded during the period                  -7,365               -1,680

Net shares assumed issued at March 31, 2000                                                       4,599

Weighted average common shares assumed outstanding for period            1,184,219            1,190,906
</TABLE>



                                       15
EXHIBIT
31.3





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Jerome
J. Dvonch, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 of NeoGenomics, Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





February
      17, 2011
              
              /s/
      Jerome J. DvonchJerome J.
      DvonchDirector
      of Finance and Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 99.1

       Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
         By Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
       Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings

I, James A. Prestiano, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2002;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant is made known to me by
         others, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the registrant's board of directors:

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  November 13, 2002.


                                       /s/ James A. Prestiano
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       James A. Prestiano, President
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Roy A. GARLAND.

No. 60150.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

Lawrence J. Genin, Chauppette, Genin & Parent, Marrero, A. J. Boudreaux, Staff Appeals Atty., Indigent Defender Board, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John M. Mam-oulides, Dist. Atty., Kenneth L. Sanders, Asst. Dist. Atty., Abbott J. Reeves, Director, Research and Appeals Div., Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

*700PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The post-conviction habeas corpus is not considered. *See*La.C.Cr.P. Art. 363.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1134** 

MICHAEL HUDGENS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville
. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 6:13

- cv - 03108

- TMC )

Submitted : August 27, 2015 Decided: August 31, 2015

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Michael Hudgens, Appellant Pro Se. Molly Elizabeth Carter, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts; William Norman Nettles, United States Attorney, Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Hudgens appeals the district court ’ s order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of disability benefits
. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) ( 2012 ). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Hudgens that failure to file timely , specific objections to this recommendation co uld waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the p arties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas
v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Hudgens has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process
. AFFIRMED
#### John "Johnny" Earl HALL v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50052.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 31, 1977.

Henry E. Pope, Columbia, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Henry T. Wingate, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County; R. I. Prichard, III, Judge.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG and WALKER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Subsidiaries of the Registrant**

Systems Research and Applications Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the registrant and a corporation organized under the laws ofthe Commonwealth of Virginia 

Touchstone Consulting Group, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Systems Research andApplications Corporation and a corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia 

Spectrum Solutions Group,Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Systems Research and Applications Corporation and a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maryland. 

RABA Technologies, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Systems Research and Applications Corporation and a limited liability companyorganized under the laws of the State of Maryland 

Orion Security Solutions, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of SystemsResearch and Applications Corporation and a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Delaware 

Constella Group, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Systems Research and Applications Corporation and a limited liability companyorganized under the laws of the State of North Carolina 

SRA Global Clinical Development, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary ofConstella Group, LLC and a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of North Carolina 

SRA GlobalClinical Development Holdings Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of SRA Global Clinical Development, LLC and a limited company organized under the laws of the United Kingdom 

SRA Global Clinical Development Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of SRA Global Clinical Development Holdings Limited. and a limitedcompany organized under the laws of the United Kingdom 

SRA Global Clinical Development S.A.R.L., a wholly owned subsidiarySRA Global Clinical Development Holdings Limited. and a company organized under the laws of France 

SRA Global ClinicalDevelopment GbmH, a wholly owned subsidiary of SRA Global Clinical Development Holdings Limited. and a company organized under the laws of Germany 

SRA Global Clinical Development d.o.o., a wholly owned subsidiary of SRA Global Clinical Development Holdings Limited. and a companyorganized under the laws of Croatia 

Interface and Control Systems, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Systems Research andApplications Corporation and a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Florida 

Era Systems Corporation, a whollyowned subsidiary of Systems Research and Applications Corporation and a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware 

Rannoch CZ s.r.o., a wholly owned subsidiary of Era Systems Corporation and a limited liability entity organized under the laws of theCzech Republic 

ERA a.s., a wholly owned subsidiary of Rannoch CZ s.r.o and a company organized under the laws of the CzechRepublic 

Perrin Quarles Associates, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Systems Research and Applications Corporation and acorporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,362
<SECURITIES>                                    36,871
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,899
<ALLOWANCES>                                       206
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,072
<PP&E>                                          11,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  63,003
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,838
<BONDS>                                            554
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        93,250
<OTHER-SE>                                    (33,825)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    63,003
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,182
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,898
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,156)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,038)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,038)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,038)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)


</TABLE>