alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC LAW 104–25—SEPT. 6, 1995 109 STAT. 263

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 614:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–36 (Comm. on Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):

June 7, considered and passed House.

Aug. 9, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–25

104th Congress

An Act

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey to the State of Minnesota the

New London National Fish Hatchery production facility.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF NEW LONDON NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY PRODUCTION FACILITY.

(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—Notwithstanding any other

provision of law and within 180 days after the date of the enactment

of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to the State

of Minnesota without reimbursement all right, title, and interest

of the United States in and to the property comprising the New

London National Fish Hatchery production facility, located outside

of downtown New London, Minnesota, including—

(1) all easements and water rights relating to that property,

and

(2) all land, improvements, and related personal property

comprising that production facility.

(b) USE OF PROPERTY.—All property and interests conveyed

under this section shall be used by the Minnesota Department

of Natural Resources for the Minnesota fishery resources management program.

(c) USE AND REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—The property conveyed

to the State of Minnesota pursuant to this section shall be used

by the State for purposes of fishery resources management, and

if it is used for any other purpose all right, title, and interest

in and to all property conveyed pursuant to this section shall

revert to the United States. The State of Minnesota shall ensure

that the property reverting to the United States is in substantially

the same or better condition as at the time of transfer.

Approved September 6, 1995.

Sept. 6, 1995

[H.R. 614]
#### UNITED STATES of America v. HYMAN MICHAELS COMPANY.

No. 6073.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Nov. 4, 1936.

Before EVANS, SPARKS, and AL-SCHULER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

On petition of counsel for appellant; it is now here ordered and adjudged that this cause be docketed in this court and that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,419
<INVENTORY>                                     69,111
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,500
<PP&E>                                          24,107
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,248
<BONDS>                                         75,205
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,047
<SALES>                                        454,635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               454,635
<CGS>                                          375,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  375,609
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   440
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,075
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,975
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,100
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25471]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Vermont Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that the Vermont 
Advisory Committee to the Commission will conduct a two-day community 
forum on November 4 and 5, 1997. The November 4 session will be held at 
the Sheraton Hotel and Conference Center, Emerald Room I and II, 870 
Williston Road, Burlington, Vermont 05403, from 1:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. 
and 7:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. The November 5 session will be held at the 
Franklin Conference Center, Howe Center, One Scale Avenue, Rutland, 
Vermont 05701, from 1:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. 
The Advisory Committee will receive information from Federal and State 
government officials, community leaders, minority students, and parents 
concerning racial harassment in the Vermont public schools.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Kimberly B. 
Cheney, 802-229-0334, or Ki-Taek Chun, Director of the Eastern Regional 
Office, 202-376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired persons who 
will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five (5) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, September 15, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-25471 Filed 9-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
#### GROVE-GABLES REALTY, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. N. E. 71ST STREET BUILDING CORP., a Florida corporation, and the Keyes Company, a corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-637.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 23, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 25, 1971.

Eli Breger, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Davant, and Miller & Miller, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Howell v. Blackburn, 100 Fla. 114, 129 So. 341 (1930) ; City Builders’ Finance Co. v. Stahl, 90 Fla. 357, 106 So. 77 (1925); and Ivy Jay Corporation v. Davis, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 715.
256 La. 63

#### Joseph A. POPICH v. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND. H. Bennett FOX v. Joseph A. POPICH.

No. 50504.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 1970.

In re: Joseph A. Popich applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Pla-quemines. 231 So.2d 604.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

Writ granted but limited to the issue of attorney’s fees. In all other respects, the application is refused.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26758]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-152-004]


Michigan Gas Storage Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

October 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 29, 1997, Michigan Gas Storage 
Company (MGS) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, a number of revised tariff sheets (Sheet Nos. 1, 
41, 41A, 54A, 67 and 67A) with effective dates of November 1, 1997. The 
sheets were filed in compliance with a letter order of June 18, 1997 in 
this docket. The sheets and order deal with Gas Industry Standards 
Board standards.
    MGS states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
customers and applicable state regulatory agencies, as well as on all 
those who are either on the official service list in this docket or on 
the official service list in Docket RP96-290-000.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make Protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26758 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 277 

To take certain land located in San Diego County, California, into trust 

for the benefit of the Pala Band of Mission Indians, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2023 

Mr. PADILLA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To take certain land located in San Diego County, California, 

into trust for the benefit of the Pala Band of Mission 

Indians, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pala Band of Mission 

5 Indians Land Transfer Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF LAND INTO TRUST FOR THE PALA 

7 BAND OF MISSION INDIANS. 

8 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

9 (1) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

10 the Secretary of the Interior. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 277 IS

1 (2) TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Tribe’’ means the Pala 

2 Band of Mission Indians. 

3 (b) TRANSFER AND ADMINISTRATION.— 

4 (1) TRANSFER OF LAND INTO TRUST.—If, not 

5 later than 180 days after the date of enactment of 

6 this Act, the Tribe transfers title to the land re7 ferred to in subsection (c) to the United States, the 

8 Secretary, not later than 180 days after the date of 

9 that transfer, shall take that land into trust for the 

10 benefit of the Tribe. 

11 (2) ADMINISTRATION.—The land taken into 

12 trust under paragraph (1) shall be part of the Pala 

13 Indian Reservation and administered in accordance 

14 with the laws and regulations generally applicable to 

15 land held in trust by the United States for an Indian 

16 Tribe. 

17 (c) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The land referred to in 

18 subsection (b)(1) is the approximately 721.12 acres of 

19 land located in San Diego County, California, generally 

20 depicted as ‘‘Gregory Canyon Property Boundary’’ on the 

21 map entitled ‘‘Pala Gregory Canyon Property Boundary 

22 and Parcels’’ and dated May 12, 2020. 

23 (d) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec24 tion— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 277 IS

1 (1) enlarges, impairs, or otherwise affects any 

2 right or claim of the Tribe to any land or interest 

3 in land that is in existence before the date of enact4 ment of this Act; 

5 (2) affects any water right of the Tribe in exist6 ence before the date of enactment of this Act; or 

7 (3) terminates or limits any access in any way 

8 to any right-of-way or right-of-use issued, granted, 

9 or permitted before the date of enactment of this 

10 Act. 

11 (e) RESTRICTED USE OF TRANSFERRED LANDS.— 

12 The Tribe may not conduct, on the land taken into trust 

13 under subsection (b)(1), gaming activities— 

14 (1) as a matter of claimed inherent authority; 

15 or 

16 (2) under any Federal law, including the Indian 

17 Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) 

18 and regulations promulgated by the Secretary or the 

19 National Indian Gaming Commission under that 

20 Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Louisiana Complete Streets Policy Update 

Elements of a Complete Streets Policy that Support Pedestrian Crossings

Sponsoring Agency: Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development (DOTD)

Plan Date: 2017

URL: http://wwwsp.dotd.la.gov/Inside_LaDOTD/Divisions/Multimodal/Highway_Safety/Complete_Streets/Pages/

default.aspx

Summary 

This policy creates a comprehensive and connected 

transportation network for Louisiana and aims to balance 

access, mobility, and safety needs of motorists, transit users, 

bicyclists, pedestrians of all ages and abilities, and users of 

wheelchairs and mobility aids. DOTD will implement effective 

pedestrian countermeasures to improve safety.

Highlights

SAFETY: All projects shall be considered for the impact that 

improvements will have on safety for all users and mitigate 

negative impacts on non-motorized modes. (Policy 5.a.)

INCLUSION OF PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES: All new and reconstruction 

roadway projects that serve adjacent areas with existing or 

reasonably foreseeable future development of transit service, 

DOTD should plan, fund, and design sidewalks and other 

pedestrian facilities. (p. 1)

INSTITUTIONALIZATION: Consideration of Complete Street facilities 

for non-motorized access and mobility shall be included in 

feasibility of project development. (Policy 5. J.)

ROAD DIET: Typical measures applied in a Road Diet include a reduction in the number of travel lanes, 

travel lane width, or introduction of space shared with or reserved for other non-vehicular uses such as bike 

lanes, pedestrian refuge islands, and sidewalks. (p. ix) 

UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS: Provide appropriate crossings at uncontrolled locations that utilize design 

measures to improve pedestrian safety, particularly those on roadways with three or more travel lanes. (p. 

19)

CONNECTIVITY: In assessing the need for a particular facility, the DOTD shall give priority to the connection of 

pedestrian, transit, and/or bicycle traffic generators. (Policy 5.g.)

IMPLEMENTATION: DOTD will provide the leadership to implement this policy on all transportation projects 

that involve Federal or State funding or approval. (p. 1)

COORDINATION WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT: The DOTD Project Manager shall contact the local government to 

determine if a Complete Street plan exists, and shall request a written recommendation from the affected 

local entity concerning the need for Complete Streets facilities in the project. (Policy 6.b.)

FHWA-SA-18-057

Image Source: Louisiana Compete Streets Update
EXHIBIT (32.2) (B)
 
 
       
 105
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of United Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brenda M. Hudson-Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '1350, as adopted pursuant to '906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Brenda M. Hudson-Nelson
 
 Brenda M. Hudson-Nelson
 Executive Vice President
 Principal Financial Officer
 April 16, 2012
Exhibit 32.1    Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   I, Timothy R. Kasmoch, as the Chief Executive Officer of N-Viro International Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the Form 10-K) (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of N-Viro International Corporation.   /s/  Timothy R. Kasmoch Timothy R. Kasmoch, President and Chief Executive Officer  April 16, 2013
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GREGORY GARRETT BROWN, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 09-103 Erie

v. )

)

RAYMOND LAWLER, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on May 5, 2009

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 2], filed on May

19, 2009, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

and that a certificate of appealability be denied. It was further recommended that

Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be dismissed. Petitioner was

allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections and service was made

on Petitioner by certified mail. Petitioner filed objections on June 4, 2009 [Doc. No. 3]. 

After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the

Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 3 day of February, 2010; rd

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition is DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that

Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DISMISSED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 2] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on May 19, 2009, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Case 1:09-cv-00103-SJM-SPB Document 4 Filed 02/03/10 Page 1 of 2
2

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:09-cv-00103-SJM-SPB Document 4 Filed 02/03/10 Page 2 of 2
256 La. 321

#### Mike CHARLES et al. v. SEWERAGE DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ST. CHARLES PARISH et al.

No. 50668.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 19, 1970.

In re: The Board of Supervisors District No. 2 of the Parish of St. Charles, Melvin Morgan, Leonard E. Woodruff and Eugene Mire and said District applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs granted. See order.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that Writs of Prohibition, Mandamus and Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Morris G. Becnel, Judge of the 29th Judicial District Court for the Parishes of St. Charles and St. John the Baptist, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 8th day of October, 1970, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings in:

> Mike Charles, et al v. Sewerage District No. 2 of St. Charles Parish, et al., No. 11,964 on the docket of the 29th Judicial District Court, and

> Stanford J. Caillouet, Sr., et al. v. Sewerage District No. 2 of the Parish of St. Charles, No. 11,856 on the docket of the 29th Judicial District Court.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court, and respondent, Mike Charles, et al. and the plaintiffs in suit No. 11,856, Stanford J. Caillouet, Sr., et al., shall show cause, in this Court, on the date aforesaid at 11:00 o’clock A.M. why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

It is further ordered that counsel for plaintiffs and defendants in both suits be notified.

It is further ordered that the Order signed by the Honorable Morris G. Becnel on May 8, 1970, permitting the Clerk of Court to receive from plaintiffs below, certain checks and money orders paid under protest, be and the same is hereby vacated and rescinded, said order not being authorized under law.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-1744WA

_____________ Winona P. Young, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western v. * District of Arkansas. * Marvin Runyon, Postmaster General, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: February 24, 1998

Filed: February 27, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Winona P. Young appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment inYoung' s employment discrimination action. Having reviewed the record and th e parties' briefs, we conclude the district court correctly rejected Young's contention that the doctrin es of waiver, estoppel, and equitable tolling excuse her failure timely t o exhaust administrative remedies. We th us deny Young's motions on appeal and affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM HMH
PROPERTIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000905038
<NAME> HMH PROPERTIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-1998
<CASH>                                             240
<SECURITIES>                                       191
<RECEIVABLES>                                       31
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                     315
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          1,803
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,532
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   424
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     78
<INCOME-TAX>                                        31
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 47
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        47
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>