alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26955]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-156-004]


Viking Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 30, 1997, Viking Gas Transmission 
Company (Viking) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the following actual tariff sheets:


Third Revised Sheet No. 40
First Revised Sheet No. 41A
Third Revised Sheet No. 49
Second Revised Sheet No. 51
Third Revised Sheet No. 87 (incorporating Standard 4.3.6)
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 87 (incorporating Standards 1.2.5, 1.2.7, 
1.3.7, 1.3.24-1.3.31, 1.3.33, 1.3.34, 5.3.22)


    For Sheet No. 87 that incorporates Standard 4.3.6, Viking proposes 
an effective date of August 1, 1997. For the remaining sheets including 
Sheet No. 87 that incorporates Standards 1.2.5, 1.2.7, 1.3.7, 1.3.24-
1.3.31, 1.3.33, 1.3.24, and 5.3.22, Viking proposes an effective date 
of November 1, 1997.
    Viking states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Letter Order issued by the Office of Pipeline Regulation, Rate Review 
Branch II, on June 11, 1997. The June 11, 1997 Letter Order directed 
Viking to file actual tariff sheets when it filed to comply with Order 
No. 587-C, Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas 
Pipelines, Docket No. RM96-1-004, FERC Regulations Preambles 
para.31,050 (1997), issued on March 4, 1997.
    Order No. 587-C required pipelines to make pro forma tariff filings 
to implement the GISB practices and standards by May 1, 1997. Viking 
filed prop forma tariff sheets when it made its May 1, 1997, filing to 
comply with Order No. 587-C.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests should 
be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26955 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

EVER VELAZQUEZ-HELSEON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10651

D.C. No. 3:12-cr-00040-LRH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 24, 2013** 

Before: ALARCÓN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Ever Velazquez-Helseon appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

being a deported alien found unlawfully in the United States, in violation of 8

U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

AUG 01 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-10651

Velazquez-Helseon contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable,

because (i) the 16-level enhancement resulted in a Guidelines range that overstates

the seriousness of his offense, and (ii) his sentence is substantially longer than the

15-month sentence he received for a prior immigration offense. The district court

did not abuse its discretion in imposing Velazquez-Helseon’s sentence. See Gall v.

United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). Notwithstanding the length of VelazquezHelseon’s previous sentence, his current sentence at the bottom of the Guidelines

range is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing

factors and the totality of the circumstances, including his violent criminal history

and two prior deportations. See id.

AFFIRMED.
NUMBER 13-18-00055-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE GREGORY WALLACE

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Longoria, and Hinojosa

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rodriguez1

By pro se petition for writ of mandamus, Gregory Wallace seeks to compel the trial 

court to “enforce the Default Judgment filed on January 10, 2018.” Relator contends that 

his “Writ in the Nature of Discovery was not Honored,” and therefore the default judgment 

must be enforced and “all claims, petitions, suits, [and filings] with any third party 

corporations regarding [relator’s] credit history [must] be dismissed and expunged.”

 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in 

any other case,” but when “denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do 

so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy. In re H.E.B. Grocery Co., 492 S.W.3d 300, 

302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Mandamus relief is proper to correct a 

clear abuse of discretion when there is no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Christus 

Santa Rosa Health Sys., 492 S.W.3d 276, 279 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding). An abuse 

of discretion occurs when a trial court's ruling is arbitrary and unreasonable or is made 

without regard for guiding legal principles or supporting evidence. In re Nationwide Ins. 

Co. of Am., 494 S.W.3d 708, 712 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding); Ford Motor Co. v. Garcia, 

363 S.W.3d 573, 578 (Tex. 2012). We determine the adequacy of an appellate remedy 

by balancing the benefits of mandamus review against the detriments. In re Essex Ins. 

Co., 450 S.W.3d 524, 528 (Tex. 2014) (orig. proceeding); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 

148 S.W.3d 124, 136 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). 

The relator bears the burden of demonstrating his entitlement to mandamus relief. 

In re H.E.B. Grocery Co., 492 S.W.3d at 302; Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 

(Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding); see also Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. 

App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding) (“Even a pro se applicant for a writ of 

mandamus must show himself entitled to the extraordinary relief he seeks.”); see 

generally TEX. R. APP. P. 52 (governing original proceedings). This burden includes 

providing this Court with a record sufficient to make that showing. See Walker, 827 

S.W.2d at 837; see generally TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k) (specifying the required contents for 

the appendix); id. R. 52.7(a) (specifying the required contents for the record).

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and the applicable law, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the 
3

relief sought. Accordingly, we DENY the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.8(a). 

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

Justice

Delivered and filed the 23rd

day of January, 2018.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-103152 and 333-21161 of Shiloh Industries,Inc. on Form S-8 of our reports dated December 21, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Shiloh Industries, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatoryparagraph relating to the adoption of a new accounting standard), and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Shiloh Industries, Inc. for the yearended October 31, 2006. 

 

/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

Cleveland, Ohio 

December 21, 2006
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRENT EVAN WEBSTER, 

Appellant, 

 v. 

U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT, 

Appellee.

No. 20-35979 

D.C. No. 3:20-cv-01403-MO 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Brent Evan Webster appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion for 

conversion to chapter 12. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We 

affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-35979 

In his opening brief, Webster fails to address how the district court erred by 

dismissing his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. As a result, Webster has waived his 

challenge to the district court’s order. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 

(9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]n appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief 

are deemed waived.”); Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We 

will not manufacture arguments for an appellant, and a bare assertion does not 

preserve a claim . . . .”). 

We do not consider matters raised for the first time on appeal. See Mano-Y 

& M, Ltd. v. Field (In re Mortg. Store, Inc.), 773 F.3d 990, 998 (9th Cir. 2014); 

Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INTERIM
UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,229,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,759
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,560,898
<PP&E>                                         363,625
<DEPRECIATION>                                 193,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,923,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          390,339
<BONDS>                                        471,796
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,966,912
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,305
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,644
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,923,996
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               708,347
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,858,957
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,160,435)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,160,435)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,160,435)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**677 KA 07-02647**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
EDDIE AMARO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (CHRISTINE M. COOK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), rendered September 19, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed ( see People v Hidalgo , 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: June 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 31.3

                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, Mark E. Scott, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of IA Global,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Amended Quarterly Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
Amended Quarterly Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Amended Quarterly Report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Amended
Quarterly Report;

Date: April 14, 2004                    /s/ Mark E. Scott
                                        -----------------------
                                        Mark E. Scott
                                        Chief Financial Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3070 

To amend the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act to reauthorize 

the youth prevention and recovery initiative. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 18, 2023 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Mrs. CAPITO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities 

Act to reauthorize the youth prevention and recovery 

initiative. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Youth Prevention and 

5 Recovery Reauthorization Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF YOUTH PREVENTION AND 

7 RECOVERY INITIATIVE. 

8 Section 7102(c)(9) of the SUPPORT for Patients 

9 and Communities Act (42 U.S.C. 290bb–7a(c)(9)) is 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3070 IS

1 amended by striking ‘‘2019 through 2023’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘2024 through 2028’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27159]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings of the National Institute of Mental Health Initial Review 
Group:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Committee Name: Clinical AIDS and Immunology Review Committee.
    Date: November 5-November 6, 1997.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.
    Place: One Washington Circle, One Washington Circle, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Regina M. Thomas, Parklawn, Room 9C-26, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-6470.

    Committee Name: Mental Health Small Business Research Review 
Committee.
    Date: November 6-November 7, 1997.
    Time: 9 a.m.
    Place: River Inn, 924 25th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Yolanda M. White, Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-1367.

    Committee Name: Neuro-Immunology, Virology, and AIDS Review 
Committee.
    Date: November 10, 1997.
    Time: 8.30 a.m.
    Place: Wyndham Bristol Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Rehana A. Chowdury, Parklawn, Room 9C-26, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: 301, 443-6470.

    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93.282)

    Dated: October 7, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-27159 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26449]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE


Appointments to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission

AGENCY: General Accounting Office.

ACTION: Notice of appointments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 establishes the Medicare 
Payment Advisory Commission, with members to be appointed by the 
Comptroller General. This notice announces the appointment and terms of 
the initial members, and the designation of the chairman and vice 
chairman, of the Commission.

DATES: Appointments effective October 1, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The General Accounting Office is at 441 G St. NW., 
Washington, DC, 20548. The Office of the Chairman of the Medicare 
Payment Advisory Commission will be at 2120 L St. NW., Washington, DC, 
20037-1527.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: General Accounting Office: Walter S. 
Ochinko, 202-512-7157. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission: Lauren 
LeRoy, 202-653-7220, or Don Young, 202-401-8986.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 1805 of the Social Security Act, as 
added by section 4022 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (Pub. L. 105-
33, 111 Stat. 251, 350) provided for creation of the Medicare Payment 
Advisory Commission, comprising 15 members appointed by the Comptroller 
General. The Comptroller General is to designate one member as chairman 
and one member as vice chairman. Members serve 3-year terms, except 
that the Comptroller General is to establish staggered terms for the 
members first appointed.
    The appointments, to be effective October 1, 1997, are: Gail R. 
Wilensky, Chair; Joseph P. Newhouse, Vice Chair; P. William Curreri, 
M.D.; Anne B. Jackson; Spencer Johnson; Peter Kemper; Judith R. Lave; 
Donald T. Lewers, M.D.; Hugh W. Long, William A. MacBain; Woodrow A. 
Myers, Jr., M.D.; Janet G. Newport; Alice F. Rosenblatt; John W. Rowe, 
M.D.; and Gerald M. Shea.
    The following members will serve 1-year terms, to expire September 
30, 1998: P. William Curreri, Anne B. Jackson, Spencer Johnson, Donald 
T. Lewers, M.D., and Janet G. Newport. The following members will serve 
2-year terms, to expire September 30, 1999: Peter Kemper, Judith R. 
Lave, Hugh W. Long, William A. MacBain, and Gerald M. Shea. The 
following members will serve 3-year terms, to expire September 30, 
2000: Gail R Wilensky, Joseph P. Newhouse, Woodrow A. Myers, Jr., M.D., 
Alice F. Rosenblatt, and John W. Rowe, M.D. Subsequent appointments 
will be for 3 years.
James F. Hinchman,
Acting Comptroller General of the United States.
[FR Doc. 97-26449 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27107]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


General Management Plan; Point Reyes National Seashore, 
California; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement

SUMMARY: The National Park Service will prepare a General Management 
Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (GMP/EIS) for Point Reyes National 
Seashore and initiate the scoping process for this document. This 
notice is in accordance with 40 CFR 1501.7 and 40 CFR 1508.22, of the 
regulations of the President's Council on Environmental Quality for the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Public Law 91-190.

Background

    The purpose of the GMP/EIS will be to state the management 
philosophy for the Seashore and provide strategies for addressing major 
issues. Two types of strategies will be presented in the GMP: (1) Those 
required to manage and preserve cultural and natural resources; and (2) 
those required to provide for safe, accessible and appropriate use of 
those resources by visitors. Based on these strategies, the GMP will 
identify the programs, actions and support facilities needed for their 
implementation.
    Persons wishing to comment or express concerns on the management 
issues and future management direction of Point Reyes National Seashore 
should address these to the Superintendent, Point Reyes National 
Seashore, Point Reyes, California 94956. Questions regarding the plan 
should be addressed to the superintendent either by mail to the above 
address, or by telephone at (415) 663-8522. Comments on the scoping of 
the proposed GMP/EIS should be received no later than January 31, 1998.
    Public scoping sessions to receive comments and suggestions will be 
conducted during the scoping period at the park and in the vicinity. 
The times and locations of these sessions will be announced in the 
local media.
    The responsible official is John J. Reynolds, Regional Director, 
Pacific West Region, National Park Service. The draft GMP/EIS is 
expected to be available for public review in the spring of 1999, and 
the final GMP/EIS and Record of Decision completed early in 2000.

    Dated: September 30, 1997.
John Reynolds,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. 97-27107 Filed 10-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00577

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.M.W. , a Child

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021PA01534

Honorable Kimberly Burley , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial

court is AFFIRMED. Costs of appeal are not assessed against appellants because they qualify as

indigent.

SIGNED March 6, 2023.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice