alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
Scott, Chief Operating and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with
the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law.

                                        /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        Chief Operating and Financial Officer
                                        August 20, 2007
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 773
Acquisition ParametersHome | Acronyms | Contents | Navigation | Profiles | Logs | Metadata | Software | Index Page
Table 1. 99FGS01 and 99FGS02 boomer data acquisition parameters.
PowerLevel(J)      SampleFrequency(Hz)      RecordLength(ms)      ShotRate(s)      ShotSpacing*(m)      NavigationSystem      NavigationReceiverAccuracy(m)300      8000      100      1      1.54      GPS      3 - 5
*Shot spacing was highly variable and is approximated on the basis of a survey speed of 3 knots.
Home | Acronyms | Contents | Navigation | Profiles | Logs | Metadata | Software | Index Page
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/773/html/table1.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, July 18, 2013, 04:46:50 PM
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Key Technology, Inc. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald W. Burgess,
        Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/
        Ronald W. Burgess
 Ronald
        W.
        Burgess
 Senior
        Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 December
        22, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52332-52333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26483]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-109-007]


Sabine Pipe Line Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 1, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 29, 1997, Sabine Pipe Line Company 
(Sabine) tendered for filing the tariff sheets listed on Attachment A 
to the filing, with an effective date of November 1, 1997.
    Sabine states that the instant filing is being made to comply with 
the provisions of Order No. 587-C issued March 4, 1997, in Docket No. 
RM96-1-004, and the Commission's order issued June 18, 1997 in Docket 
No. RP97-109-004.
    Sabine states that copies of this filing are being mailed to its 
customers, state commissions and other interested parties.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 
385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests 
must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public

[[Page 52333]]

inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26483 Filed 10-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for **

decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

AL SHLOMO KLAUS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-56444

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00579-WDK-E

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

William D. Keller, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 10, 2013** 

Pasadena, California

Before: NOONAN, WARDLAW, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Al Shlomo Klaus appeals the award of $1,710,000 in damages following a

jury trial in a civil action brought by the United States to recover fire suppression

costs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

MAY 20 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

The government’s expert damages witness, a financial analyst with the

United States Forest Service, testified concerning the costs the federal government

incurred to fight the Crown Fire and the Forest Service’s methods of ensuring that

only costs incurred in fighting the Crown Fire, as opposed to those relating to the

contemporaneous Foothill Fire, were attributed to that fire. This testimony,

coupled with the government’s extensive documentary evidence of its expenses,

was sufficient to support the jury’s damages award. See L.A. Mem’l Coliseum

Comm’n v. Nat’l Football League, 791 F.2d 1356, 1365-66 (9th Cir. 1986).

Klaus argues that the jury’s damages award was necessarily speculative

because the jury (1) rejected the full amount of damages claimed by the

government and (2) deliberated for only one day, a purportedly insufficient amount

of time to examine “each piece of paper” produced by the government “to ascertain

if charges were properly allocable to the Crown Fire.” These arguments are

unavailing. First, “the jury is not bound to accept the bottom line provided by any

particular damages expert,” and the jury had ample evidence before it from which

to arrive at its own proper calculation. In re First Alliance Mortg. Co., 471 F.3d

977, 1002 (9th Cir. 2006); accord Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Indus. Accident

Comm’n, 199 P.2d 302, 306 (Cal. 1948) (“The trier of fact may accept the evidence

of any one expert or choose a figure between them based on all the evidence.”). 
3

Second, the jury was not required to conduct its own audit of the government’s

source documentation to avoid arriving at a “speculative” award. Instead, it was

entitled to rely on the evidence that was presented to it, including the testimony of

two damages experts and numerous exhibits, at least three of which were

summary-type documents that could be carefully reviewed in less than a day. See

L.A. Mem’l Coliseum Comm’n, 791 F.2d at 1366.

Because the jury’s finding of the amount of damages is supported by

substantial evidence and was not speculative, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ABIMAEL MANSO-DIAZ, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) C.A. No. 05-192 Erie

)

JAMES SHERMAN, Warden, )

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on 

June 20, 2005 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise

Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, filed on January 12,

2006, recommended that Defendant’s motion [Doc. No. 10] to dismiss, or in the

Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and that the complaint be

dismissed based upon a failure of the Plaintiff to have exhausted his administrative

remedies. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file

objections. Plaintiff filed his objections [Doc. No. 18] on January 30, 2006.

After de novo review of the Complaint and the documents in the case, together

with the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s objections, the following order is

entered:

AND NOW, this 1st Day of March, 2006, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #10-1] or, in the alternative, Motion for

Summary Judgment [Doc. # 10-2] is GRANTED 

Case 1:05-cv-00192-SJM-SPB Document 19 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 2
The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter dated

January 30, 2006 is adopted as the opinion of this Court. The Clerk is directed to mark

this case “CLOSED.” 

s/ Sean J. McLaughlin 

United States District Judge

cm: all parties of record .nk

Case 1:05-cv-00192-SJM-SPB Document 19 Filed 03/01/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MATTHEW BOBENRIETH, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 05-332 Erie

)

WAL-MART STORES, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

On December 9, 2005, this Court entered an Order following the Plaintiff’s failure to file

a Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 3], ordering Plaintiff to show cause as

to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute [Doc. No. 5].

AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2005, Plaintiff having failed to show cause and/or

file a response to Defendant’s motion to dismiss, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this matter is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to

prosecute. 

The clerk is directed to mark the case closed. 

s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: All parties of record. 

Case 1:05-cv-00332-SJM Document 6 Filed 12/27/05 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27291]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33302]


R.J. Corman Railroad Co./Allentown Lines, Inc.--Acquisition and 
Operation Exemption--Consolidated Rail Corp.

    R.J. Corman Railroad Company/Allentown Lines, Inc. (RJCN), a Class 
III rail carrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 
1150.41 to acquire and operate a total of approximately 2.76 miles of 
rail line owned by Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail), known as 
Cornwall Industrial Track, between milepost 0.9 and milepost 3.66 in 
Lebanon County, PA. RJCN will also acquire a 0.6-mile segment of 
Conrail's Lebanon Industrial Track between approximately milepost 18 
and approximately milepost 18.6, which is parallel and adjacent to a 
portion of the Cornwall Industrial Track.\1\ The transaction was 
expected to be consummated on or soon after September 30, 1997.
    If the notice contains false or misleading information, the 
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 
U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to 
revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33302, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit,1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001 and served on: Kevin M. Sheys, Oppenheimer 
Wolff & Donnelly, 1020 Nineteenth Street, NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 
20036.

    Decided: October 7, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27291 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
1 EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

Submittal Date May 13, 2014

District Name Placer

Date Reviewed July 3,2014

EPA Reviewer Arnold Lazarus Key:

C = Complete

I = Incomplete

N/A = Not Applicable To Rule

O = Material Missing

N/S = None Submitted

RULE #: 247 249 502

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee C C C

(b) Evidence of adoption C C C

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt C C C

(d1) Copy of actual rule/plan C C C

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross

- out C N/A C

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements C C C

(f) Copy of public notice C C C

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice C C C

(h) Public comments & agency response N/S N/S N/S

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified C C C

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified C C N/A

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact C C N/A

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A N/A N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions C C N/A

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements C C N/A

(h) Compliance/enforcement strategies C C N/A

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A N/A N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS C C C
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3046 

To make permanent the authority to collect Shasta-Trinity National Forest 

marina fees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 16, 2023 

Mr. PADILLA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To make permanent the authority to collect Shasta-Trinity 

National Forest marina fees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT AUTHORIZATION TO COLLECT 

4 SHASTA-TRINITY NATIONAL FOREST MARINA 

5 FEES. 

6 Section 422 of the Department of the Interior, Envi7 ronment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008 

8 (Public Law 110–161; 121 Stat. 2149; 123 Stat. 747; 128 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3046 IS

1 Stat. 346), is amended by striking ‘‘through fiscal year 

2 2019’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27165]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Amendment to Declaration of Disaster #2976]


State of North Carolina; (And Contiguous Counties in South 
Carolina)

    The above-numbered declaration is hereby amended to extend the 
filing deadline for physical damage to November 5, 1997.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the deadline for 
filing applications for economic injury is May 5, 1998.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: October 5, 1997.
Aida Alvarez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-27165 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Case 09-29574-GLT Doc 167 Filed 06/04/15 Entered 06/04/15 16:09:50 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 10
Case 09-29574-GLT Doc 167 Filed 06/04/15 Entered 06/04/15 16:09:50 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 10
Case 09-29574-GLT Doc 167 Filed 06/04/15 Entered 06/04/15 16:09:50 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 10
Case 09-29574-GLT Doc 167 Filed 06/04/15 Entered 06/04/15 16:09:50 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 10
Case 09-29574-GLT Doc 167 Filed 06/04/15 Entered 06/04/15 16:09:50 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 10
Case 09-29574-GLT Doc 167 Filed 06/04/15 Entered 06/04/15 16:09:50 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 10
Case 09-29574-GLT Doc 167 Filed 06/04/15 Entered 06/04/15 16:09:50 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 10
Case 09-29574-GLT Doc 167 Filed 06/04/15 Entered 06/04/15 16:09:50 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 10
Case 09-29574-GLT Doc 167 Filed 06/04/15 Entered 06/04/15 16:09:50 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 10
Case 09-29574-GLT Doc 167 Filed 06/04/15 Entered 06/04/15 16:09:50 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOHN LEGGETT )

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) C.A. No. 05-283 Erie

)

MARILYN BROOKS )

Respondent. )

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2005, after Petitioner presented a petition for a

writ of habeas corpus which he seeks leave to prosecute in forma pauperis, and it appearing that

he has an average monthly balance of $ 28.43 in his account at the prison which sum is far in

excess of the $ 5.00 filing fee required to commence this action, and it further appearing that

requiring the petitioner to pay the filing fee will not deprive him of any necessities of life at the

Institution, 

It is recommended that leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied.

Petitioner shall have until October 19, 2005, in which to file objections to said Report

and Recommendation. Failure to file timely objections may constitute a waiver of any appellate

rights.

S/ Susan Paradise Baxter 

 SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00283-SJM-SPB Document 2 Filed 10/04/05 Page 1 of 1
#### Stanley J. KLINE et al., Appellants, v. PYMS SUCHMAN REAL ESTATE COMPANY et al., Appellees.

Nos. 77-1602, 77-1662.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 11, 1978.

Papy, Duval, Poole & Usich and Sheridan K. Weissenborn, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Pallot, Stern, Proby & Adkins, Goodwin, Ryskamp, Welcher & Carrier and Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Jepeway, August, Gassen & Pohlig, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: *Dade County Classroom Teachers’ Association, Inc. v. Rubin,*238 So.2d 284 (Fla.1970); *State of Florida Department of Transportation v. Florida East Coast Railway Company,*275 So.2d 289 (Fla.3d DCA 1973); *Airvac, Inc. v. Ranger Insurance Co.,*330 So.2d 467 (Fla.1976).
Case 1:04-cv-00186-MBC Document 31 Filed 09/13/06 Page 1 of 12Case 1:04-cv-00186-MBC Document 31 Filed 09/13/06 Page 2 of 12Case 1:04-cv-00186-MBC Document 31 Filed 09/13/06 Page 3 of 12Case 1:04-cv-00186-MBC Document 31 Filed 09/13/06 Page 4 of 12Case 1:04-cv-00186-MBC Document 31 Filed 09/13/06 Page 5 of 12Case 1:04-cv-00186-MBC Document 31 Filed 09/13/06 Page 6 of 12Case 1:04-cv-00186-MBC Document 31 Filed 09/13/06 Page 7 of 12Case 1:04-cv-00186-MBC Document 31 Filed 09/13/06 Page 8 of 12Case 1:04-cv-00186-MBC Document 31 Filed 09/13/06 Page 9 of 12Case 1:04-cv-00186-MBC Document 31 Filed 09/13/06 Page 10 of 12Case 1:04-cv-00186-MBC Document 31 Filed 09/13/06 Page 11 of 12Case 1:04-cv-00186-MBC Document 31 Filed 09/13/06 Page 12 of 12
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-67350), Form S-8 (No. 333-33775) and Form S-3
(No. 333-67403) of National Golf Properties, Inc. of our reports dated
February 28, 2001 and March 2, 2001 on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of National Golf
Properties, Inc. and American Golf Corporation and Subsidiaries, respectively,
which appear in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Los Angeles, CA
March 27, 2001
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
 1. Berg Technology, Inc., a Nevada corporation
 
 2. Berg Holdings U.S., Inc., a Delaware corporation
 
 3. Berg Electronics Korea Ltd., a Korean corporation
 
 4. Berg Electronics, B.V., a Netherlands corporation
 
 5. Berg Electronics Manufacturing B.V., a Netherlands corporation
 
 6. Berg Electronics Distributor B.V., a Netherlands corporation
 
 7. Berg Connector Systems, S.L., a Spanish corporation
 
 8. Berg Connector Systems GmbH, a German corporation
 
 9. Bergtronics, O.y., a Finnish corporation
 
10. Berg Electronics, S.r.L., an Italian corporation
 
11. Berg Electronics Canada, Inc., a Canadian corporation
 
12. Berg Electronics Hong Kong Limited, a Hong Kong corporation
 
13. Berg Electronics Singapore PTE Ltd., a Singapore corporation
 
14. Berg Electronics S.A., a French corporation
 
15. CBOS Electronics, AB, a Swedish corporation
 
16. Berg Electronics S.A., a Swiss corporation
 
17. Connector Systems Limited, a United Kingdom corporation
 
18. Connector Systems (U.S.), Inc., a Delaware corporation
 
19. Berg Electronics Taiwan Ltd., a Taiwanese corporation
 
20. Berg Electronics, Japan K.K., a Japanese corporation
 
21. Berg Electronics Engineering K.K., a Japanese corporation
 
22. Connector Systems Technology, N.V., an Antilles corporation
 
23. TVS Berg Ltd., an Indian corporation (a 40% owned joint venture)
 
24. Harbor Electronics, Inc., a Delaware corporation
 
25. Socket Express, Inc., a New Jersey corporation
 
26. Berg Electronics Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation
 
27. Specialty Connector Company, a Delaware corporation
 
28. Berg Employment Company, a Delaware corporation
 
29. Berg Connectors Sweden AB, a Swedish corporation
 
30. Berg Electronics China Ltd., a Hong Kong corporation
 
31. Berg Electronics Nantong, Ltd., a People's Republic of China corporation
 
32. Berg Electronics Ireland B.V., a Netherlands corporation
 
33. Berg (UK) Limited, a United Kingdom corporation
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Freedomof navigation (FON) report for fiscal year (FY)**
 
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.142:
Item Number:0306-A-92 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001079717
 
September 12, 2018