alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Specimen of Unit Certificate



Exhibit 4.1 
 
CITIGROUP DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P. 
 
A NEW YORK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 
 
CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST 
 
 

	  This is to certify that
	  	  
	
	  is the owner of
	  	  UNITS


 
of Limited Partnership
interest in Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P., a limited partnership organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York, and that such Units are held pursuant to an Agreement of Limited Partnership and are issued, owned, held and
transferable subject to the limitations, conditions and provisions of the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Partnership. No assignee or transferee of the Units of Limited Partnership Interest represented hereby may become a substituted limited
partner in Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P. without the consent of the General Partner, which consent may be withheld in the General Partner’s sole and absolute discretion. 
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P. by its General Partner has issued this
Certificate as evidence of the ownership of the aforesaid Units of Limited Partnership Interest this      day of
                        , 2003. 
 
 

	  CITIGROUP DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.

	
	  By: Smith Barney Futures Management LLC, its General Partner
STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

and

THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

TRADING AGREEMENT AND

ORDER NO. 8092 MODIFICATION

TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER MODIFICATION

[11 the matter of a Trading Agreement and Order between the Commissioner of Environmental

Protection ("Commissioner") and The United Illuminating Company ("UI").

WHEREAS. the Commissioner and UI, having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth

in Trading Agreement and Order o. 8092 issued on May J8, 1995, do now, by mutual agreement,

modify paragraph B. as follows:

1. Change the first date specified in paragraph B. fTom April 30, 1999 to

April 30, 2003 and change the second date specified in paragraph B. from

April 30, 199910 April 30, 2003.

All other terms and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order No. 8092 issued by the

Commissioner acting under Sections 22a-6, 22a-171. 22a-174, 22a-176. 22a-177 and 22a-178 of

the Connecticut Gencral Slatutes shall rcmain in effcct.

, " '"

Initials: C"'i'5S \ -

(Printed on Recycled Paper)

79 Elm Street • Hartford, CT 06106·5127

http://dep.$lat e.CI.UI

An Eqllfll Opporrllnit)' Emplfl)'U

Date #~M
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING

COMPANY

2 TRADING AGREEMENT AND

ORDER NO. 8092

MODIFICATION

The United Illuminating Company hereby consents to the entry of this modification to the Trading

Agreement and Order without further notice.

The United Illuminating Company

Type Name: Albert N. Henricksen

Type Title: Group Vice President - Support Services

Date: April 30. 1999

Entered as a modification of an Order of the Commissioner ofEnvironmental Protection numbered

8092 this __-'S"""-'O'----tA__day of -J..4....,.J=:.:o;..· ,-_ 1999.

hur 1. Rocque, Jr.

ommissioner

CITY OF BRIDGEPORT

LAND RECORDS

MAILED CERTIFIED MAIL,

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Certified Document No.
EXHIBIT  32.02

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of AvStar Aviation Group, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"), the
undersigned,  in  the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  his  knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.     The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 22,  2011                        /s/  Robert  Wilson
                                                -------------------
                                                Robert  Wilson,
                                                Chief  Financial  Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

      I, Francis J. Alfano, Chief Executive Officer of MTM Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|        | 1. |   | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2005, which this certification accompanies (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------------------------------------|----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        | 2. |   | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                          |

Dated: June 29, 2005

|                                                                              | /s/ FRANCIS J. ALFANO**Francis J. AlfanoChief Executive Officer** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
### - r-ARTMEH T01 - VA^iPPORT/VIIO N jCKE t 0FERM10M 3 \ \ ^;^ V 1 5 P ! • 0 2 

# CIT Y O F JONESBOR O

Novembe r7 , 201 1 Denni s J . DeVan y 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D

C 2059 0 Dea rDenni s J . DeVany : Than k yo u fo rth e updat e yo u submitte d t o u s o n Octobe r24t h 2011 . I believ e tha t th e continuanc e o fth e ai rtransportatio n servic e i s essentia l t o Jonesboro' s grov\/th . A s th e cit y continue s t o gro wan d prospe rthi s servic e wil l becom e exceedingl yrelevant . Althoug h I understan d th e subjec t matte ro f thi s lette ri s fo rcomments , I woul d lik e t o tak e thi s opportunit yt o stat e tha t th e Cityo fJonesbor o woul d accep t th e offe ro f Ai rChoic e One . Than k yo u agai n fo rth e updat e an d I loo k forwar d t o hearin g a decisio n i n th e nea rfuture . Sincerely , Harol d Perri n Mayo r HP/cl g

Executive Ojfice -Cit y Hal l • P.O . Bo x 184 5 • Jonesboro , Arkansa s 72403-184 5 • (870 ) 932-105 2 • FAX: (870 ) 933-461 9
#### Brian D. STRALEAU, a minor, by and through his father, natural guardian and next friend, Elvin Straleau, and Elvin Straleau, individually, Petitioners, v. CANADA DRY BOTTLING COMPANY OF FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation, and Owens-Illinois Glass Company, a foreign corporation, Respondents.

No. 69-867.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 13, 1970.

Rehearing Denied April 30, 1970.

Certiorari quashed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alexis Korybut, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Alexis Korybut





Alexis Korybut


Chief Executive Officer


May 23, 2011
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                    EVANS SYSTEMS, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Evans System, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lee Ann Cooper,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Lee Ann Cooper
-------------------------------
Lee Ann Cooper
Chief Financial Officer
December 30, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-61-009]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC GAS Tariff

October 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 29, 1997, NorAm Gas Transmission 
Company (NGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets to be 
effective November 1, 1997:

Second Revised Sheet No. 168
Third Revised Sheet No. 192
Third Revised Sheet No. 204
Third Revised Sheet No. 217

    NGT states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
letter order issued in this docket on June 30, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests must be 
filed as provided in Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26594 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Order filed, January 03, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00995

- CV

____________ JOHN TERMEER , Appellant

V.

RAMON MARTINEZ AND W ENONA MARTINEZ , Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 00604



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due November 15, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the co urt. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Patricia Palmer , the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
No. 00-18.

#### Booker, Warden *v.*Ward et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Lopez*v. *Davis, ante,*p. 230.
#### Willie Mae STEVENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-144.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 4, 1971.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-defendant appeals the judgment of conviction and sentence of five years for possession of narcotic drugs and ten years for sale of narcotic drugs.

Appellant’s primary point on appeal is that the trial court erred in permitting the introduction of a bag of heroin into evidence when the chain of custody had not been proven. The prosecution, by competent evidence, proved that there was no tampering with the contraband between the time it was purchased from appellant and the time it was analyzed by the State chemist and subsequently introduced into evidence. Stunson v. State, 228 So.2d 294 (Fla.App.3d 1969), and Gallego v. United States, 9 Cir., 276 F.2d 914. The analysis reflected without dispute that the package seized contained heroin. The evidence showed that this heroin had been sold by appellant.

The second point raised by appellant does not merit discussion. The judgment appealed from is

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K„ and RAWLS, JJ-, concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                  SECTION 1350
                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Robert Fallah,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Key  Command  International  Corp.,  hereby  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September
30,  2004 (the  "Quarterly  Report")  which  this  statement  accompanies  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  information  contained in the  Quarterly  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of Key
Command International Corp.


Dated:  June 6, 2005                                 /s/ Robert Fallah
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Robert Fallah
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating,  acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been  provided to Key Command  International  Corp.
and will be retained by Key Command  International  Corp.  and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Troop Support provides food, generators for Hurricane Harvey relief
 
  By Michael Tuttle, DLA Troop Support Public Affairs
  The Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support is providing food, water, generators and other materials in support of Hurricane Harvey relief efforts. The materials are being provided to the Federal Emergency Management Agency and U.S. Northern Command in support of state and local disaster response efforts.

“The people of Texas and Louisiana are suffering terribly in the wake of Hurricane Harvey’s devastation and it is a priority for us to help alleviate as much of that suffering as we can,” said Richard Ellis, DLA Troop Support deputy commander. “DLA Troop Support is uniquely positioned to respond quickly to crises like Hurricane Harvey with world-class logistics to help ensure disaster responders have what they need,’ he said. “Troop Support’s expertise and our strong relationships with industry partners allows us to support U.S. Northern Command and FEMA, in support of local disaster response efforts to assist those affected by the storm.” DLA Troop Support’s Subsistence supply chainis working with industry partners to deliver 18.4 million meals to FEMA. Deliveries are scheduled to begin Sept. 1.

Subsistence managed the delivery of 42,432 Meals, Ready-to-Eat for the Texas Army National Guard and 7,896 MREs for the Marines Corps Reserves. Subsistence is also managing the delivery of 1.5 million bottles of water to FEMA. TheConstruction and Equipment supply chainis managing the delivery of 3,983 cots for the Texas Army National Guard. C&E also provided 11 generators and 14,500 sandbags to the incident support base at Joint Base San Antonio-Seguin Auxiliary Airfield. The ISB was set up to stage supplies for the disaster relief efforts.

C&E is supporting FEMA with 575 personal flotation devices that will be delivered to Houston for search and rescue efforts. DLA Troop Support’s Hurricane Harvey relief effort support is in addition to fuel and distribution support that DLA Energy and DLA Distribution are providing.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EDWARD J. NICHOLAS, )

Plaintiff, )

) C.A. No. 06-200 Erie

v. )

) District Judge McLaughlin

DONALD HEFFNER, et al, ) Magistrate Judge Baxter

Defendants. )

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I. RECOMMENDATION

It is respectfully recommended that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without prejudice

to Plaintiff’s right to pay the filing fee of $350.00 before October 23, 2006. 

II. REPORT

Plaintiff, an inmate incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Albion, presented

this civil rights complaint, along with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Section 804(g) of Pub.L. No. 104-134, enacted April 26, 1996, amended 28 U.S.C. §

1915 to provide:

[i]n no events shall a prisoner bring a civil action ... under this section if the

prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any

facility, brought an action or appeal in the court of the United States that was

dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger

of serious physical injury.

28 U.S.C. §1915(g).

Plaintiff has been a prolific advocate in this federal court. At least three of Plaintiff’s

prior lawsuits have been dismissed as legally frivolous: Civil Actions Numbers 06-98 Erie, 06-

112 Erie, and 06-201 Erie, all filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of

Pennsylvania. 

Case 1:06-cv-00200-SJM-SPB Document 7 Filed 10/03/06 Page 1 of 2
2

An indigent inmate may overcome the “Three Strikes Rule” if he can show that he is

under “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307

(3d Cir. 2001) (interpreting imminent danger). Plaintiff has not alleged such imminent danger.

Accordingly, Plaintiff must pay the full filing fee before October 23, 2006, or risk

dismissal of this action.

III. CONCLUSION

Because of these prior dismissals, and because Plaintiff has not alleged that he is in

imminent danger of serious physical injury, it is recommended that the complaint be dismissed

without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to pay the full filing fee of $350.00 to the Clerk of Courts

before October 23, 2006. 

In accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Local

Rule 72.1.4B, the parties are allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file written

objections to this report. Any party opposing the objections shall have seven (7) days from the

date of service of objections to respond thereto. Failure to timely file objections may constitute

a waiver of any appellate rights.

S/ Susan Paradise Baxter

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: October 3, 2006

Case 1:06-cv-00200-SJM-SPB Document 7 Filed 10/03/06 Page 2 of 2
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000036 25-SEP-2014 08:16 AM

SCWC-12-0000036 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATION TRUST 2006-WF1, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF MAKAHA VALLEY PLANTATION, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant, and JOHN ROBERT BAUTISTA; MAUREEN PALANGGOY BAUTISTA; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000036; CIV. NO. 09-1-2489) ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the abovereferenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court of Appeals at the time the application for certiorari was filed,
see Hawai ' i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2013); see also Hawai ' i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s application for writ of certiorari, filed September 22, 2014, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAPRule 40.1(a) (2014) (“The application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is extended in accordance with this rule.”). DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, September 25, 2014. Robert E. Chapman and Mary Martin for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In re: Clyde Ura Cain, Sr.

No. 06-14-00203-CR

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief 

Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the petition for writ of 

mandamus should be dismissed. Therefore, we dismiss the petition.

RENDERED DECEMBER 3, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk