alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27406]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Acadia National Park, Bar Harbor, Maine; Acadia National Park 
Advisory Commission; Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770, 5 U.S.C. App. 1, Sec. 10), 
that the Acadia National Park Advisory Commission will hold a meeting 
on Monday, October 27, 1997.
    The Commission was established pursuant to Pub. L. 99-420, sec. 
103. The purpose of the commission is to consult with the Secretary of 
the Interior, or his designee, on matters relating to the management 
and development of the park, including but not limited to the 
acquisition of lands and interests in lands (including conservation 
easements on islands) and termination of rights of use and occupancy.
    The meeting will convene in the Chart Room, Youth Center Bldg., 
U.S. Navy Base, Winter Harbor, Maine, at 1 p.m. to consider the 
following agenda:
    1. Review and approval of minutes from the meeting held July 28, 
1997.
    2. Tour of Schoodic Peninsula.
    3. Land Conservation Committee report.
    4. U.S. Naval Security Group Activity current mission and future 
projections.
    5. Old business.
    6. Superintendent's report.
    7. Public comments.
    8. Proposed agenda and date of next Commission meeting.
    The meeting is open to the public. Interested persons may make 
oral/written presentations to the Commission or file written 
statements. Such requests should be made to the Superintendent at least 
seven days prior to the meeting.
    Further information concerning this meeting may be obtained from 
the Superintendent, Acadia National Park, P.O. Box 177, Bar Harbor, 
Maine 04609, tel: (207) 288-3338.

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
Paul F. Haertel,
Superintendent, Acadia National Park.
[FR Doc. 97-27406 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE U.S SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sense Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and Rule 13a-14(b), that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    September 10, 2009


|                                             | 
|-------------------------------------------- | 
|/S/ BRUCE E. SCHREINER                       | 
|Bruce E. Schreiner, President                | 
|(principal financial and accounting officer) | 

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pinpoint Recovery Solutions Corp. and will be retained by Pinpoint Recovery Solutions Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

Order 

July 22, 2011 

143304-5 

_________________________________________ 

 SC: 143304 

In re RIDLING/RIDLING-FOSTER/FOSTER, COA: 299729 

Minors. Oakland CC Family Division: 

 08-752006-NA 

_________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v 

KARRI RIDLING-FOSTER, 

Respondent-Appellant, 

and 

ARTHUR FOSTER, 

Respondent. 

_________________________________________/ 

 SC: 143305 

In re RIDLING-FOSTER/FOSTER, Minors. COA: 299730 

 Oakland CC Family Division: 

________________________________________ 08-752006-NA 

 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v 

KARRI RIDLING-FOSTER, 

Respondent-Appellant, 

and 

ARTHUR FOSTER, 

Respondent. 

_________________________________________/
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 22, 2011 

h0719 

 

2

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 2, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25627]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments and Recommendations

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to 
request approval on a new, and/or currently approved information 
collection.

DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before November 25, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, Small Business Administration, 409 
3rd Street, S.W., Suite 5000, Washington, D.C. 20416. Phone Number: 
202-205-6629.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title: ``Request for Management and Technical Assistance''.
    Type of Request: Revision of Currently Approved Collection.
    Form No: 641.
    Description of Respondents: Individuals Requesting Counseling 
Management Counseling from SBA.
    Annual Responses: 450,000.
    Annual Burden: 59,850.

    Title: ``Counselor's Case Report''.
    Tye of Request: Revisions of Currently Approved Collection.
    Form No: 641A.
    Description of Respondents: SBI and Score Counselors.
    Annual Responses: 450,000.
    Annual Burden: 90,000.
    Comments: Send all comments regarding these information collections 
to John Bebris, Director, Business Education & Resource Management, 
Small business Administration, 409 3rd Street, S.W., Suite 6100, 
Washington, D.C. 20416. Phone No: 202-205-7424. Send comments regarding 
whether these information collections are necessary for the proper 
performance of the function of the agency, accuracy of burden estimate, 
in addition to ways to minimize these estimates, and ways to enhance 
the quality.
Jacqueline White,
Chief, Administrative Information Branch.
[FR Doc. 97-25627 Filed 9-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**
















**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**




















The
      certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
      15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with Section 1350 of
      Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Charles Searock, the President
      and Principal Executive Officer of Tactical Air Defense Services ,Inc. hereby
      certifies that:





1.
      the
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tactical Air
      Defense Services, Inc.











Date:
      November 13, 2006         TACTICAL
      AIR DEFENSE
      SERVICES, INC., Registrant




/s/
      Charles
      Searock




By:
      Charles Searock, President and Principal Executive
      Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27690]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:03 a.m. on 
Tuesday, October 14, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
relating to the Corporation's corporate and supervisory activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of John F. 
Downey, acting in the place and stead of Director Nichols P. Retsinas 
(Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), seconded by Julie L. 
Williams, acting in the place and stead of Eugene A. Ludwig 
(Comptroller of the Currency), concurred in by Director Joseph H. Neely 
(Appointive), and Acting Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., that Corporation 
business required its consideration of the matters on less than seven 
days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was 
practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of 
the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the 
matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of 
subsections (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B) 
and (c)(10) of the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and 
(c)(10)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550--17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

    Dated: October 14, 1997.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James D. LaPierre,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-27690 Filed 10-15-97; 10:14 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27095]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) 
meetings:

    Name of SEP: Transfusion-Associated Immunomodulation (TRIM) 
Telephone Conference Call.
    Date: November 5, 1997.
    Time: 1:30 p.m.
    Place: Two Rockledge Center, Room 7214, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    Contact Person: Louise Corman, Ph.D., Two Rockledge Center, Room 
7180, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-0270.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.

    Name of SEP: Lipoprotein Metabolism in Atherosclerosis.
    Date: December 8-9, 1997.
    Time: 7:30 p.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, Maryland 20815.
    Contact Person: Ivan Baines, Ph.D., Two Rockledge Center, Room 
7184, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-0277.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    These meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C. 
Applications and/or contract proposals and the discussions could 
reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of 
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.837, Heart 
and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; and 
93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes 
of Health)

    Dated: October 6, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-27095 Filed 10-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 10.89

May 2,
2000

Mr. Rick
Karo
Hearst Entertainment
1640 S. Sepulveda Blvd., 4th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90025

| | Re: |  | Term Sheet: Hearst Entertainment/The Harvey Entertainment Company Joint Venture
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Rick:

This
letter shall confirm the terms of our agreement regarding the strategic alliance between The Harvey Entertainment Company ("Harvey") and Hearst Entertainment ("Hearst") in
connection with the licensing and merchandising activities of Harvey and the Harvey characters, as follows:



---



We
look forward to our mutually beneficial relationship. Please indicate your agreement to the terms and conditions herein by signing in the space provided below. Please be advised
that Harvey's agreement shall be subject to approval by its Board of Directors.

|Best regards,                                 |  |             
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|/s/RICK MISCHELRick Mischel President and COO |  |             
|Agreed and Accepted:                          |  |             
|HEARST ENTERTAINMENT                          |  |             
|By:                                           |  | /s/RICK KARO
|Its:                                          |  | Exec. V.P.  
|Date:                                         |  | 5/24/00     

2

---

QuickLinks
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Kelly Wayne Lamon, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00241

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 102nd District Court of Red River County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR

02184 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial cou rt

. We note that the appellant, Kelly Wayne Lamon, has adequately indicated his inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 19, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 31.1

NUTRITIONAL SOURCING CORPORATION
CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, William T. Keon III, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Nutritional Sourcing
    Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
    of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
    report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material
    respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
    the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
    to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
    board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
     are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability
     to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
     and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
     internal control over financial reporting.


Date: December 23, 2004

/s/ William T. Keon III_
William T, Keon III
Chief Executive Officer
#### Columbus "Peter" MARTIN v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 45912.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 12, 1970.

Johnny N. Tackett, Aberdeen, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Guy N. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John N. Kinard, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

ROBERTSON, Justice:

The appellant, Columbus “Peter” Martin, was indicted for murder in the Circuit Court of Monroe County, Mississippi. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of manslaughter and asked “for mercy of the court.” The court sentenced the appellant *133to fifteen years in the State penitentiary, with ten years suspended indefinitely.

The only assignment of error was that the court erred in permitting Officer Russell Newman to testify as to statements made by Leroy Young as he stood over the appellant, the appellant contending that he was unconscious at the time.

Officer Newman testified on direct examination :

> “Leroy Young was standing over Columbus Martin, in the room there, crying and taking on and hollering that Columbus had shot his wife, and he had a pistol in his hand and he handed the gun to me, and said that Columbus bad shot his wife, and that he ought to kill him.”

Leroy Young had already testified that he had seen the appellant shoot his wife, Arie Lou Young, with a pistol and that he, Leroy, had taken the pistol away from the appellant and had hit him with it, knocking him to the floor.

On cross-examination Officer Newman was asked if “Peter” Martin was not unconscious at the time Officer Newman took the pistol from Leroy Young. Officer Newman answered that Martin was groaning and trying to get up off of the floor, and that he obeyed Officer Newman to lie down until the ambulance arrived. On redirect examination, Officer Newman expressed the opinion that the appellant was drunk.

Be that as it may, Officer Newman’s testimony as to what Leroy Young said was on an issue that was not in dispute. Lois Jean Clay and Leroy Young had already testified that they saw the appellant shoot Arie Lou Young. Their testimony was positive and unequivocal, and the identity of the killer had already been established at the time Officer Newman testified.

Officer Newman further testified that he and his partner, Harold Lindsey, were only two blocks away and arrived on the scene two or three minutes after receiving the radio call.

What Leroy Young said in the presence of Officer Newman could very well have been considered as part of the res gestae, because Young’s statements were spontaneously and emotionally made at the scene right after the shooting.

From the testimony, the jury could have believed that the appellant was not unconscious but merely drunk and, therefore, responsible for his unsteady and. unstable condition. This might have been why the jury recommended mercy and the court granted it.

We are of the opinion that the only assignment of error is without merit, and that the judgment and sentence of the trial court should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

GILLESPIE, P. J., and JONES, BRADY and INZER, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3199 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3199

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase penalties for 
            unauthorized disclosure of taxpayer information.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2023

  Mr. Daines introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase penalties for 
            unauthorized disclosure of taxpayer information.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Increasing Rightful Sentences Act'' 
or the ``IRS Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN PENALTIES FOR UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURES OF TAXPAYER 
              INFORMATION.

    (a) In General.--Paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of section 7213(a) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are each amended by striking ``a fine 
in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 
years'' and inserting ``, with respect to each person whose return or 
return information was disclosed, a fine in any amount not less than 
$5,000 and not greater than $10,000, or imprisonment of not more than 
10 years''.
    (b) Solicitation.--Paragraph (4) of section 7213(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``a fine in any amount not 
exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years'' and 
inserting ``, with respect to each person whose return or return 
information was received, a fine in any amount not less than $5,000 and 
not greater than $10,000, or imprisonment of not more than 10 years''.
    (c) Shareholders.--Paragraph (5) of section 7213(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``a fine in any amount not 
to exceed $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years'' and 
inserting ``, with respect to each corporation or subsidiary thereof 
for which return or return information was disclosed, a fine in any 
amount not less than $5,000 and not greater than $10,000, or 
imprisonment of not more than 10 years''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to disclosures made after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
259 La. 59

#### J. C. SINGLETON v. YOUNGER BROTHERS, INC. and Employers Mutual Liability Ins. Co. of Wisconsin.

No. 51483.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 21, 1971.

In re: Younger Brothers, Inc. and Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 247 So.2d 273.

Application denied. No error of law in the judgment.