1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

 Washington, D.C. 20590

May 1, 2013

FHWA: HSST: WLongstreet: sf.x60087: WLongstreet: 4/24/13

File: h://directory folder/HSST/ CC-115D_TL3 SOFT-STOP Terminal.docx

cc: HSST Will Longstreet

In Reply Refer To:

HSST/CC-115D

Mr. Brian Smith

Trinity Highway Products, LLC

2525 North Stemmons Freeway

Dallas, Texas 75207

Dear Mr. Smith:

This correspondence supersedes existing eligibility letter HSST/CC-115A dated September 7, 

2012 and is in response to your request for additional system details for furthered consideration 

for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) review of the as-described roadside safety system 

for eligibility for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program.

Name of system: Trinity TL3 SOFT-STOP Terminal

Type of system: W-Beam Guardrail Terminal

Test Level: MASH Test Level 3 (TL-3)

Testing conducted by: Original testing by Texas Transportation Institute

Task Force 13 Designator: SEW22

Date of request: January 23, 2013

Date of final package: April 12, 2013

Decision:

The following device is eligible, with details provided in the form which is attached as an 

integral part of this letter.

• Trinity TL3 SOFT-STOP Terminal 

Based on a review of previous crash tests submitted by the manufacturer certifying the device 

described herein meets the crash test and evaluation criteria of the American Association of State 

Highway and Transportation Officials’ Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH), the 

device is eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program. Eligibility for 

reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program does not establish approval or 

endorsement by the FHWA for any particular purpose or use.

The FHWA, the Department of Transportation, and the United States Government do not 

endorse products or services and the issuance of a reimbursement eligibility letter is not an 

endorsement of any product or service.
2

Requirements

To be found eligible for Federal-aid funding, roadside safety devices should meet the crash test 

and evaluation criteria contained in the American Association of State Highway and 

Transportation Officials’ Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). 

Description

The device and supporting documentation are described in the attached form.

Summary and Standard Provisions

Therefore, the system described and detailed in the attached form is eligible for reimbursement 

and may be installed under the range of conditions tested. 

Please note the following standard provisions that apply to FHWA eligibility letters:

• This letter provides a AASHTO/ARTBA/AGC Task Force 13 designator that 

should be used for the purpose of the creation of a new and/or the update of existing 

Task Force 13 drawing for posting on the on-line ‘Guide to Standardized Highway 

Barrier Hardware’ currently referenced in AASHTO Roadside Design Guide.

• This finding of eligibility does not cover other structural features of the systems, 

nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.

• Any changes that may influence system conformance with MASH will require a 

new reimbursement eligibility letter.

• Should the FHWA discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in-service 

performance reveals safety problems, or that the system is significantly different 

from the version that was crash tested, we reserve the right to modify or revoke this 

letter.

• You are expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design 

and installation requirements to ensure proper performance.

• You are expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has the 

same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for review, 

and that it will meet the test and evaluation criteria of the MASH.

• To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of eligibility is designated as

number CC-115D and shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test 

documentation upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and 

documentation may be reviewed at our office upon request. 

• This letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to use, 

manufacture, or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent 

holder. The FHWA does not become involved in issues concerning patent law. 

Patent issues, if any, are to be resolved by the applicant.

• The Trinity SOFT-STOP Terminal is a patented product and considered proprietary. 

If proprietary systems are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid 

projects: (a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally

suitable unpatented items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are 

essential for synchronization with the existing highway facilities or that no equally 

suitable alternative exists; or (c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive 

type of construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes. 
3

Our regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23, Code of 

Federal Regulations, Section 635.411.

Sincerely yours,

Michael S. Griffith

Director, Office of Safety Technologies

Office of Safety

Enclosures
US. Deportment 

of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration 

Mr. Brian Smith 

Trinity Highway Products, LLC 

2525 North Stemmons f.'reeway 

Dallas, Texas 75207 

Dear Mr. Smith: 

May I, 20 13 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

In Reply Refer To: 

HSST/CC-115D 

This correspondence supersedes existing eligibility letter HSST/CC-115A dated September 7, 

2012 and is in response to your request for additional system details for furthered consideration 

for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) review of the as-described roadside safety system 

for eligibility for reimbursement under the rederal-aid highway program. 

Name of system: Trinity TL3 SOFT-STOP Terminal 

Type of system: W-Beam Guardrail Terminal 

Test Level: MASH Test Level 3 (TL-3) 

Testing conducted by: Original testing by Texas Transportation Institute 

Task Force 13 Designator: SEW22 

Date of request: January 23, 2013 

Date of final package: April 12, 20 13 

Decision: 

The following device is eligible. with details provided in the form which is attached as an 

integral part of this letter. 

• Trinity TL3 SOf.'T-STOP Terminal 

Based on a review of previous crash tests submitted by the manufacturer certifying the device 

described herein meets the crash test and evaluation criteria of the American Association of State 

Highway and Transportation Officials' Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH), the 

device is eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program. Eligibility for 

reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program does not establish approval or 

endorsement by the FII WA for any particular purpose or use. 

The FHWA, the Department of Transportation. and the United States Government do not 

endorse products or services and the issuance of a reimbursement eligibility letter is not an 

endorsement of any product or service. 
Requirements 

To be found eligible for Federal-aid funding, roadside safety devices should meet the crash test 

and evaluation criteria contained in the American Association of State Highway and 

Transportation Officials' Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). 

Description 

The device and supporting documentation are described in the attached form. 

Summary and Standard Provisions 

Therefore, the system described and detailed in the attached form is eligible for reimbursement 

and may be installed under the range of conditions tested. 

Please note the following standard provisions that apply to FHW A eligibility letters: 

2 

• This letter provides a AASHTO/ARTBA/AGC Task Force 13 designator that 

should be used for the purpose of the creation of a new and/or the update of existing 

Task Force 13 drawing for posting on the on-line 'Guide to Standardized Highway 

Barrier Hardware' currently referenced in AASHTO Roadside Design Guide. 

• This finding of eligibility does not cover other structural features of the systems, 

nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 

• Any changes that may influence system conformance with MASH will require a 

new reimbursement eligibility letter. 

• Should the FHW A discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in-service 

performance reveals safety problems, or that the system is significantly different 

from the version that was crash tested, we reserve the right to modify or revoke this 

letter. 

• You are expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design 

and installation requirements to ensure proper performance. 

• You are expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has the 

same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for review, 

and that it will meet the test and evaluation criteria of the MASH. 

• To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of eligibility is designated as 

number CC-1150 and shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test 

documentation upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and 

documentation may be reviewed at our office upon request. 

• This letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHW A to use, 

manufacture, or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent 

holder. The FHW A does not become involved in issues concerning patent law. 

Patent issues, if any, are to be resolved by the applicant. 

• The Trinity SOFT-STOP Terminal is a patented product and considered proprietary. 

If proprietary systems are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid 

projects: (a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally 

suitable unpatented items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are 

essential for synchronization with the existing highway facilities or that no equally 

suitable alternative exists; or (c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive 

type of construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes. 
Enclosures 

Our regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23, Code of 

Federal Regulations, Section 635.411. 

Sincerely yours, 

Michael S. Griffith 

Director, Office of Safety Technologies 

Office of Safety 

3 
Version 4_1 (10/ll) 

Page 2 of 6 

Request for Federal Aid Rein1bursement Eligibility 

Of Highway ·safety Harchvare 

.~ Name: oc.,o_G!.ipQ~.-.: - .... 

~ Company: TR.lNl!f.HIGHWAYPRQDU~!J.:C : 

~1-----,Ar.:r.::dtlr::lres=s=-: +25~ •.. .,.,...2?_:· .:,-5-tEM-:--.:-._M-O..,.._N.S-=-_·..,..._F-REE__:.W:-A-Y.--:-;b...,._Al.lA:._ .. .,.,..·_-.. -:-.~-,lX~.~.-. _-75-.1..,....0..,.."{:- .. ~-... ::-,-.. .....,..:.--:-1 

To: MichaelS. Griffith, Din!ctor 

fHWA, Office of Safety Technologies 

I request the following devices be considered eligible for reimbursement under the Federar-aid 

highway program. 

·System Type Devke Name/Variant Testing Criterion Test 

Level 

By submitting this request for review and evaluation by the Federal Highway Administration, I certify 

that the product(s) was (were) tested in conform1ty with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety 

Hardware and that the test f evaluation results meet the appropriate evaluation criteria in the MASH_ 

ldentifkotion of the individual or o,..nha!ion respon~ble for the produ~/,~ 9) ~ ContactName: B~IAN:S~flli:, (f/. • 

Company Name: TRINh:Y._HI(;tiWAY?ROQUCTS, LLc · 

Addressl: 

o~:ro,.rx}5297 . . . City/State/Zip~ 

CountJy! 

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 

. . . . ,· r:· . --: . .. ·- , - . :- . : - . . ... . ··~ . 

. JS.re.qt•~stJ~:tO:ac~p~th:e~s-t~~~ryJ¢1e-iss l?.erqc~1J5for.th~foll~~~ng~ · . - . . . . . . ~ •, . ··~ ·. ';. '.' ~ ' . •. . . . -. ·. . . ' .. - . . - ' .. . . . .. 

. ]. .(~TG-3:5oftstqpT~~~na{wrih ~."ien~ of:so·~9ji2· .· · 2.: ,~ rr)cti.<?f.S. .fitd:~ w9<tdic$ir.lP,b.sJ~ blP'kouts. · . · · . a. Anoffs~2~orifro~t(r19ent,fla~ iaie.ofi5i1. . . . . . . . .. . 4; :Foratta~tnn~ntto S~foch/12-:lrkh bf6Cfcoutsy.stems or .no blockoutW-beam 9uardrallsystems~: . -~ . ~ . ·.. . . - ' . - - . . . . 
Version 4.1 (10/11) 

Page 1 of 5 

.. 

Ql 

t: 

e 

.a 

:I 

en 

Request for Federal Aid Reimbursement Eligibility 

Of Highway Safety Hardware 

Date of Request: April11, 2013 

Name: DonGripne 

Company: TRINITY HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, LLC 

Address: 2525 STEMMONS FREEWAY, DALLAS, TX 75207 

To: Michael S. Griffith, Director 

FHWA, Office of Safety Technologies 

I request the following devices be considered eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid 

highway program. 

System Type Device Name I Variant Testing Criterion Test 

Level 

'CC': Crash Cushions, Attenuators, & T TRINITYn-3 SOFT-STOP TERMINAL AASHTOMASH n3 

By submitting this request for review and evaluation by the Federal Highway Administration, I certify 

that the product(s) was (were) tested in conformity with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety 

Hardware and that the test I evaluation results meet the appropriate evaluation criteria in the MASH. 

Identification of the individua I or organization responsible for the product: 

Contact Name: BRIAN SMITH 

Company Name: TRINITY HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, LLC 

Address 1: 2525 STEMMONS FREEWAY 

Address 2: 

City/State/Zip: DALLAS, TX 75207 

Country: USA 

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 

Modification to Existing Hardware Non-Significant- Effect is positive or Inconsequential 

The original crash test of the Trinity Soft Stop (TTl Crash Report 2009) as per Eligibility Letter CC-115 dated 

December 19, 2011 specified steel post and w-beam guardrail using 12-inch wood block out. The crash test 

was conducted by Texas Transportation Institute (Til) entitled NCHRP 350 Crash Testing and Evaluation of the 

Vertical Squisher' dated February 2009 (Til Crash Report 2009). 

This request is to accept the as-tested article as per CC -11 5 for the following: 

1. A MASH TL-3 Soft Stop Terminal with a length of 50'-91/2". 

2. 12 inch or 8 inch wood/composite block outs. 

3. An offset 2-foot from tangent, flare rate of 25:1. 

4. For attachment to 8-inch/12-lnch block out systems or no blackout W-beam guardrail systems. 

This modification is considered Non-significant, Effect is Positive or Inconsequential. 
CRASH TESTING 

Version 4.1 (10/11) 

Page 2 of 5 

A brief description of each crash test and its result: 

Required Test Narrative Evaluation 

Number Description Results 

As per Til Crash Report 2009, an 11 OOC (2425 1 b) passenger car impacting 

the terminal end-on at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mi/h and 

0 degree, respectively, with the quarter point of the vehicle aligned with 

the center line of the nose of the terminal. This test is primarily intended 

to evaluate occupant risk and vehicle trajectory criteria. The SOFT -STOP 

slowed and redirected the 11 OOC vehicle. No occupant compartment 

3-30 (1100() deformation occurred. The 1100C vehicle remained upright during and WAIVER REQUES 

after the collision event. Maximum roll was 25 degrees, and maximum 

pitch was 7 degrees. Occupant risk factors were within the limits specified 

for MASH test 3-30. The vehicle subsequently came to rest 27 feet 

downstream of impact and 34 feet toward traffic lanes. The SOFT-STOP 

performed acceptably according to the evaluation criteria of MASH test 

3-30. 

As per Til Crash Report 2009, A 2270P (5000 I b) pickup truck impacting 

the terminal end-on at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mi/h and 

0 degree, respectively, with the center line of the vehicle aligned with the 

center line of the nose of the terminal. This test is primarily intended to 

evaluate occupant risk and vehicle trajectory criteria. The SOFT-STOP 

3-31 (2270P) brought the 2270P vehicle to a controlled stop. No occupant WAIVER REQUES compartment deformation occurred. The 2270P vehicle remained upright 

during and after the collision event. Maximum roll was 4 degrees, and 

maximum pitch was -3 degrees. Occupant risk factors were within the 

limits specified for MASH test 3-31. The 2270P vehicle came to rest within 

the installation. The SOFT-STOP performed acceptably according to the 

evaluation criteria of MASH test 3-31. 

As per Til Crash Report 2009, an 11 OOC (24251 b) passenger car impacting 

the terminal end-on at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mph and 

5/15 degrees, respectively, with the center line of the vehicle aligned with 

the center line of the nose of the terminal. This test is primarily intended 

to evaluate occupant risk and vehicle trajectory criteria. The SOFT -STOP 

slowed and stopped the 11 OOC vehicle. No occupant compartment 

3-32 (1100C) deformation occurred. The 1100C vehicle remained upright during and WAIVER REQUES 

after the collision event. Maximum roll was 28 degrees, and maximum 

pitch was -26 degrees. Occupant risk factors were within the limits 

specified for MASH test 3-32. The vehicle subsequently came to rest 

with the front of the vehicle adjacent to post 4 of the terminal, with most 

of the vehicle toward the field side. The SOFT -STOP performed 

acceptably according to the evaluation criteria of MASH test 3-32. 

As per Til Crash Report 2009, the 2000P vehicle, traveling at an impact 

speed of 62.7 mi/h, impacted the nose of the Vertical Squisher end-on at 

an impact angle of 16.3 degrees. At 0.044 s after impact, the head ofthe 

terminal began to move along the rail, and at 0.093 s, the 2000P vehicle 

began to redirect toward the field side. The front right tire contacted the 

3-33 (2270P) terminal at 0.207 s. The vehicle began to travel parallel with the guardrail WAIVER REQUES at 0.285 s, at a speed of 48.2 mi/h (77.6 km/h). At 0.372 s, the 2000P 

vehicle overrode the terminal and lost contact with the guardrail and was 

traveling at an exit speed and angle of 51.7 mi/h (83.2 km/h) and 1.8 

degrees, respectively. After completely exiting the installation, the 2000P 

vehicle partially traversed a steep mound of soil and came to rest on its 

right side 242ft downstream and 30ft toward the field side. 
Required Test 

Number 

3-34(1100C) 

3-35 (2270P) 

3-36 (2270P) 

3-37 (2270P) 

Version 4.1 (10/11) 

Page 3 of S 

Narrative Evaluation 

Description Results 

As per TTl Crash Report 2009, an 11 OOC (2425 1 b) passenger car impacting 

the terminal at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mi/h and 15 

degrees, respectively, with the comer of the vehicle bumper aligned with 

the critical impact point (CIP) ofthe length of need (LON) of the 

terminal. This test Is primarily intended to evaluate occupant risk and 

vehicle trajectory criteria. The SOFT-STOP contained and redirected the 

11 OOC vehicle. The vehicle did not penetrate or override the installation. 

Maximum dynamic deflection was 1.96 feet and the head fed through 6.2 WAIVER REQUES feet of w-beam rail element. Maximum occupant compartment 

deformation was 1.0 inch inward in the area of the instrument panel on 

the left side. The 11 OOC vehicle remained upright during and after the 

collision event. Maximum roll was 1 0 degrees, and maximum pitch was -4 

degrees. Occupant risk factors were within the limits specified for MASH 

test 3-34. The vehicle subsequently came to rest 15 feet toward traffic 

lanes in front of post 8. The SOFT -STOP performed acceptably according 

to the evaluation criteria of MASH test 3-34. 

As perm Crash Report 2009, a 2270P (5000 lb) pickup truck impacting 

the terminal at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mi/h and 25 

degrees, respectively, with the comer of the vehicle bumper aligned with 

the beginning of the LON of the terminal. This test is primarily intended to 

evaluate structural adequacy and vehicle trajectory criteria. The SOFTSTOP contained and redirected the 2270P. The vehicle did not under ride 

or override the installation. Although thew-beam rail anchorage released 

late in the impact event, the vehicle did not penetrate the installation. 

While the vehicle was in contact with thew-beam, the maximum dynamic WAIVER REQUES deflection was I 0.4 feet. However, the upstream anchor released 

and as the vehicle lost contact with thew-beam, thew-beam continued 

to deflect, reaching a maximum displacement of 11.6 feet. The kickpanel 

of the left side was deformed inward 0.4 inch. The 2270P vehicle 

remained upright during and after the collision event. Maximum roll was 

-30 degrees, and maximum pitch was -12 degrees. Occupant risk factors 

were within the preferred limits specified for MASH test 3-31. The 2270P 

vehicle exited within the exit box. The SOFT -STOP performed acceptably 

according to the evaluation criteria of MASH test 3-35. 

As per TTl Crash Report 2009, a 2270P (5000 I b) pickup truck impacting 

the terminal at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mi/h and 25 

degrees, respectively, with the comer of the vehicle bumper aligned with 

the CIP with respect to the transition to the stiff barrier or backup 

structure. As a w-beam guardrail terminal, the SOFT-STOP will never be 

attached directly to a backup structure, and the transition to a stiff barrier WAIVER REQUES 

is basically at Post 3. Therefore, Trinity feels that Test 3-36 is irrelevant and 

was therefore not conducted. 

Eligibility Letter CC-11 5 indicated that MASH test 3-36 may be waived 

because the SOFT-STOP will not be connected to any stiffer device than 

W -beam guardrail. 

As perm Crash Report 2009, a 2270P (5000 I b) pickup truck impacting 

the terminal at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mi/h and 25 

degrees, respectively, mid-point between the nose and the end of the 

terminal in the reverse direction. This test is intended to evaluate the 

performance of a terminal for a "reverse" hit. However, researchers at TTl WAIVER REQUES believe that the reverse direction impact would be more critical for the 

11 OOC (2425 lb) passenger car than for the 2270P pickup. Therefore, an 

11 OOC (2425 lb) passenger car was used in Test 3-37. 

Eligibility Letter CC -115 indicated that the substitution of the 11 OOC 

vehicle to evaluate the reverse direction impact was appropriate. 
Version 4.1 (10/11) 

Page 4 of 5 

As per Til Crash Report 2009, a 1 SOOA (33071 b) passenger car impacting 

the terminal end-on at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mi/h and 

0 degree, respectively, with the center line of the vehicle aligned with the 

center line of the nose of the terminal. This test is primarily intended to 

evaluate the performance of the staged anenuator/terminal when 

impacted by a mid-size vehicle. The SOFT-STOP is not a staged device. 

Therefore Test3-38 was not conducted. However, as per Appendix G of 

3-38 (1500A) MASH, calculations based on Test 3-31 have been performed to predict WAIVER REQUES the occupant risk values for the 1500A (33071 b) vehicle. The results of 

these calculations (shown on the enclosed document) predict that in 

crash testing with the 1500A (33071 b) vehicle, the SOFT-STOP Terminal, 

would perform acceptably according to the Test Level 3 (TL-3) evaluation 

criteria set out in the MASH guidelines for terminals. 

Eligibility Lener CC-115 indicates t hat test 3-38 is not necessary because 

the SOFT-STOP is not a staged device and that manufacturers calculations 

predict crash worthy performance with the 1 500A vehicle. 

3-40 (1 1 OOC) Does not apply to non-gating/energy absorbing devices. 

3-41 (2270P) Does not apply to non-gating/energy absorbing devices. 

3-42 (1 100() Does not apply to non-gating/energy absorbing devices. 

3-43 (2270P) Does not apply to non-gating/energy absorbing devices. 

3-44 (2270P) Does not apply to non-gating/energy absorbing devices. 

3-45 (1500A) Does not apply to non-gating/energy absorbing devices. 

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the fo llowing accredit ed crash test 

laboratory (cite the laboratory's accreditation status as noted in the crash t est reports.): 

Laboratory Name: Texas Transportation Institute 

Laboratory Contact: Dean Alberson 

Address: 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX. 77843-3135 

Country: USA 

Accredit ation Certificat e Mechanical 2821.01, Current date April 30, 2013 

Number and Date: 

ATTACHMENTS 

Attach to this form: 

1) A copy of the Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in support of this request. 

2) A drawing or drawings of t he device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications 

[Hardware Guide Drawing Standards]. For proprietary products, a single isometric line drawing is 

usually acceptable to illustrate the product, with detailed specifications, intended use, and contact 

information provided on the reverse. Additional drawings (not in TF-13 fo rmat) show ing details that 

are key to underst anding the performance of th e device should also be submitted to facilitate our 

review. 
FHWA Official Business Only: 

Eligibility Letter 

Number Date 

CC-1150 April22, 2013 

AASHTOTF13 

Designator 

SEW22 

Key Words 

Version 4.1 (10/11) 

Page 5 of 5 

TL3, non-gating/energy absorbing terminal, 

tensioned wbeam guardrail terminal, steel yielding 

terminal posts, deflector term ina I head. 
.,4'ill "lSI~ J (i.-J) LL...CTI1 'Y T.I\Nf'o' Scf~;; ~ 

!.t-Jf/"1" 

1'-T 1'-T 

Lc ~----------------------------------------~"r--------------~----------------~ 

liDO 

l)lllllRID~ASSIIIUIIo\NUAI. 

2) ~ IS A IWII liSt LNI. J (IL-l) liD li[A!IDT, 

POm"'~ 

J) r COP PWilC OfF!lT 11.00<$ (flflUI!Ii) 1>1/l oiiXI1T>IU A-m. lllllliiiG.T IVoD AND IIJl 

4) IH[- IOAIUAC1U2111 SUCIIS1S MltiD II)-li!NC1lllillA!a. IF --·?fi~~=-' 

SECTION "C-C (IGSISfl"ill) 

FOST fl "' 15203 ('ID&Il.~ . 

fOST"' ISIIID , •• ll.~ 

DETAIL "C" (FOSifl, ___ , 

DO IIDT AnAOt 1M 

r-r--...t:,--..;,•r-:' POST P 

SECTION "8-B" 

(FOSfp) 

-fQST"' ••• s 

DETAIL "B" 

(AI .IIOtCII FOSIIJ l 

DETAIL "A" 

1••--IJ) 

L. 

DETAIL "D" (I'OSTfl) 

1111NITY SoltStop TEIMNAl (8" Bl.OCKS} 

PLAN, El.£VA n())f & SECllON 

MASH TEST lE\U J (ll-J) 

TRNITY HIGHWAY Pi!ODUCTS. UC. 

---· DAlW. ll '1!2117 
WA!li n~T l[\'H J (rl.-J) UloC"H OJ ~"'f' St.l~\1~" HrN.N.AL 

~-111/'1" 

1110 

l)IIIJlliiO-AS!IIB.TJIMijAI. 

I) - IIA 0AS11 1ISf 1N1. J (lL-J) Ill) litAIIDT. 

J) 12" DID' I\JIS1lC cmrt IIJlCZS (IM[D) 16% NXIPtiiU AL!WIOU 

., --SUfXU1S QISTtiiR 10-IUIK1ai!LIIIQII Of IICIIJ>IJJOI. 

1'1111;~ ,_,1 .... 

.allSI'IIWO 

CIIOUII)sna/1 "'fmJ IMIOIIIOI.IICAD ~~~ .. n~:;=IIOI.' A110 11/1 

I'OST(ll'lll»CJ 

(II•~ • 

DETAIL "C" 

(PCIITfi.--GiiWCI) 

CO lilT ATW>t W. 

~II'OSTP, 

OCIIII'II we 1111~ 

POSTI'II150CIO 

••·r.~ 

"' .:. ,.., 

.:. 

Lc L . 

IIA~ ~:JYJ;MIIOI.' ct.aT..: AI W:t:O U'GI EAT NlAD MD llln 

Q~'=' 

DETAIL "B" 

(Al-FOS'IfO) 

-CI-..a.I'IIWCO IIAI'IDC !cOSt:o ~ 

(rUIUl) -- -~ 

T~ '=!:z~t.ciE::J lJ. 

SECTION "C-C 

I FQilS fJ -Ill 

SECTION "B-B" 

( I'05T fO) 

DETAIL "A" (AT-I'OSTfO) 

51!1'• I I 1/'F 10 It) 1101.1 llllt JUIAII) OSIDS 

J.OaJIIIOI.T IIIAO Alii ICUT 

1'05Tfli'IIJ5m t-- ...... --

DETAIL "D" ( FOST fl) 

lR!NllY SofiSiop TERUIMAL (12" BlOCKS) 

PlAN, n£VA 1lON &: SECTION 

UASH lEST l.E\a J (Tl-J) 

1'RIHITY HlGMWAY PROOUCTS, UC. 

---· IIAUAS,11'1S201 

... mae 
r;.~ ; ::::.!!'.~1'..::.-~ r:_...-..~"M .. O!I:!I!!!IIP.~- ..,.-,_.,_ 

·~··.\t:l 

\HIIIl.J0.000 s 

\"of 

~ 

I 

General lnlonnetlon 

..... . ,. 

0.137 

.. ,. 

r ---l"!'f"'\ QD ~·· , 1\'l-nlot!l. "' ,., :Ut.IJ \T &I •I \1"11 • "11'.\1 I 

Test Agency ............................. Te118!1 Transportation lnsUtute 

Test No ................................... 400001-TSQ1 

Dale ......................................... 2009-10.01 

Test Article 

Type ................ '" ...................... Terminal 

Name ....................................... Ver1ically Loacfmg Terminal (VI.. T) 

Installation Length ................... 151.75 ft 

Mll1erial or Key Elements ........ 311n tall 12 ga ~am, steel posts 

Soli Type and Condition ........... StandaRI Soil, Damp 

TGfit Vehicle 

TypeJDeslgnelion ..................... 2270P 

Make and Model ...................... 2003 Dodge Ram 1500 quad-cab pickup 

CUib ......................................... 4708 lb 

Test Inertial.............................. 5028 1b 

Dummy .................................... No dummy 

Grass Sialic ••...•.....••...•••.•••...••• 50281b 

i 

. 

•• I' •• ,.w· 

·····- .. _.,. ... ,.. 

Impact Conditions 

Speed ................................... .&3.5 mllh 

Angle .................................... 26.4 degrees 

LocaUonfOitentation .••......•••• At Post 3 

EldtCon~ns 

Speed ................................... .out of view 

Angla ••••••.•.•••.•..................•••• .out of view 

Occupant RJsk Vatuoe 

Impact Velocity 

Longitudinal ........................ 15.8 ftls 

Laleral ................................ 14.4 ftls 

Ridadown Aalalerations 

L.onglludinal ........................ -11.0 G 

Lateral ................................ 7.9 G 

THIV ..................................... 21.0 kmlh 

PHD ....................................... 11.6G 

Max. 0.050-s Awrage 

Longltudlnal ........................ -4.7 G 

Lateral ................................ 5.0 G 

VCifllcal ............................... 2.5 G 

t t 

Post-Impact Trajectory 

....... .. -... 

SIDpplng Dlslance ......................... 62.5 ft dwnslrm 

9.4 ft lwd ltaffic 

Vohlcle Stability 

Mulmum Yaw Angle..................... 74 degrees 

Maximum Pitch Angle .................... -12 degrees 

Maximum Roll Angle ...................... -3D degrees 

Vehids Snaoolng. .......................... No 

Vehicle Pockellng .......................... No 

TeS1 Anlde Deflections 

Dynamlc ......................................... 11.6 ft 

Permanent ..................................... 11.2 ft 

Wotlclng Width ............................... 10.4 ft 

Vohldo Damage 

ws ............................................... 11LFQ4 

CDC ............................................... 11FDEW3 

Max. Extarior DerormaUon ............. 16.0 Inches 

Max. Occupant Compartment 

Dero:malion ............................. o.4 Inch 

Summary of results for MASH test 3-35 on the VL T. 
n 

General Information 

Test Agency ............................. Tmcas Transpol1alion Institute 

Test No ................................... 4000D1·TS06 

Dale ......................................... 2010.01-06 

Test Article 

Type ......................................... Tennlnal 

. -. 

Nama ....................................... Vertically loading Terminal (Vl T) 

Installation Long1h ................... 151.75 ft 

Material or Key Elements ........ 311n laU 12 ga w-beam. steel posts 

Soil Type and Cond~n ........... S1andard Soil, Damp 

TeatVehlclo 

Typell)eslgnallu ..................... 2270P 

Make ami Model ...................... 2003 Dodgo Ram 1 SOU quad-cab pickup 

Curb ......................................... 46951b 

Test Inertial .............................. 49581b 

Dummy .................................... No dummy 

GftiSS Sialic ............................. 49581b 

Impact Condld11ns 

Speed ................................... .60.9 milh 

Angle ..................................... 7.3 deglves 

Localion/Orientalion .•••••..•.••• .Enlkn 

Exit Conditione 

Speed •••.•••••••...•..•••.•.•••••.••••.• .OUt of view 

Angle .••••••••••..•.••..•.......•••••.•... Out of view 

Occupant Rbik Vl:lfUH 

Impact Velocity 

Longi1Udlnal •••••••••••••••.•.•...• .21.0 ftls 

Lalend ................................ 3.0 ftls 

Rldodovm Acculerallons 

longiWdinal ........................ -9.5 G 

Lateral ................................ 3.8 G 

THIV ..................................... .23.3kmll'l 

PHD ....... "" ........................ - •• 9.7 G 

Max. 0.050-s AY818!J8 

longlludlnaJ,., .. ,,, .. .,,., .... ,mol'7.3 G 

Lateral ................................ 2.8 G 

Vettk:al ............................... -3.1 G 

.. .,.,.,. ........ _ ::-:.-:: . 

Poat.Jmpad TraJectory 

Stopping Distanm ......................... 28 ft dwnslnn 

Adjcnl to field llkle 

Vehicle StabJIJty 

Maximum Yaw Angle ..................... as degrees 

Maximum Pilch Angle.................... 5 degrees 

Maldmum Roll Angle ...................... -21 degrees 

Vehlde Snagging ............... "" ......... No 

Vehlde Podceling .......................... No 

Test Article Deflections Dynamic......................................... 2.0 ft 

Pennane~ ..................................... 2.0 ft 

Working WidU'I ............................... 14.7 ft 

Vehlde Dl:lmage 

VDS ............................................... 12FC5 

CDC ............................................... 12FCEN4 

Max. Exterior Defonnatllm ............. 17.75 lndlas 

Max. Oc:c:upant Compaltment 

Defolmallon ............................. 0 

Summary of results for MASH test 3-33 on the VLT. 
... 

, ... .. r!Sj"' 1-. ""tr.· •• 

GenonJllnfonnatlon 

Test Agency ............................. Texas Transportation Institute 

Test No ................................... 400001-TS07 

Date •..••..••••.••....••••••.••••...••••.••.• 201()-()1-12 

TwtArtlclo 

Type •••••••••••.••.......•........•.••..•..•• Telminal 

Name ....................................... Veftit:ally l..oading Tonninal (Vl T) 

lns1allalion Length ••·•·••••·•••••••·• 151.75 ft Material or Key Bamonts •.••••.. 311n ta!l12 ga w-beam. steel pos1s 

SoU 1)pe ond Condition ........... Stamfa!d So~. Damp 

Test Velllclo 

Typell)llli;nallon ..................... 2270P 

Make and Modal ...................... 2002 Dodge Ram 1500 quad-<:ab pickup 

CUrb ......................................... 5024 lb 

Test lneltlal .............................. 5084 lb 

Dummy .................................... No dummy 

Gross S1DIIc ............................. 50841b 

., ... , . ........ 

_, .. ~~w~~~ 

-,------t . . + •· . \.. '.. . ~ : ...... , .. ; ;- ........... l I t I 

Impact Conditions 

Speed ................................... .81.1 mllh 

Angle ..................................... 1 A degrees 

LocatloniOrlantatlon ............. .Enlkm 

EDt Conditions 

Speed ................................... .out of view 

Angle .................................... .5.0 degrees 

Occupant Risk Values 

Impact Valllcity 

Longltudlnal ....................... 20.0 Ills 

Lalarlll ............ .................... 0.0 fils 

Ridedown Accelerations 

Longltudlnal ........................ -8.6 G 

Lataral ................................ -2.3 G 

THIV ..................................... .21.8 kmlh 

PHD ....................................... 8.6G 

Max. 0.050-s Avensga 

Longltudlnel ....................... .-5.0 G 

Lateral ................................ .0.8 G 

Valtlcal ............................... 2.3 G 

Post.wpact Trajectory 

Stopping Dlstance ......................... 37.5 ft dwnstnn 

Over posts 6-7 

Vehicle SIDblllty 

Maximum Yaw Angle..................... 3 degrees 

MaJ0murn Pl!c:h Angle .................... -3 degrees 

Maximum RoD Angle ...................... 4 degrees 

Vehicle Snagging ........................... No 

Vehlde Podcelin!J •••••..•....•••.......••.. No 

Test Article DoftGctlons 

Dynamic. ........................................ 45.7 ft 

Pennanen\ ..................................... 45.7 ft 

WoJtdng Wllflh ............................... 4.4 ft 

VCihlde Damage 

VDS ............................................... 12FC5 

CDC ............................................... 12FCEN4 

Max. Exterior Dehlrmallon ............. 17.0 inches 

Max. Occupant Compal1ment 

Darormation ............................. 0 

Summary of results for MASH test 3-31 on the VL T. 
US. Deportment 

of Transportation 

Federal Highway 

Administration 

Mr. Brian Smith 

Trinity Highway Products, LLC 

2525 North Stemmons f.'reeway 

Dallas, Texas 75207 

Dear Mr. Smith: 

May I, 20 13 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

In Reply Refer To: 

HSST/CC-115D 

This correspondence supersedes existing eligibility letter HSST/CC-115A dated September 7, 

2012 and is in response to your request for additional system details for furthered consideration 

for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) review of the as-described roadside safety system 

for eligibility for reimbursement under the rederal-aid highway program. 

Name of system: Trinity TL3 SOFT-STOP Terminal 

Type of system: W-Beam Guardrail Terminal 

Test Level: MASH Test Level 3 (TL-3) 

Testing conducted by: Original testing by Texas Transportation Institute 

Task Force 13 Designator: SEW22 

Date of request: January 23, 2013 

Date of final package: April 12, 20 13 

Decision: 

The following device is eligible. with details provided in the form which is attached as an 

integral part of this letter. 

• Trinity TL3 SOf.'T-STOP Terminal 

Based on a review of previous crash tests submitted by the manufacturer certifying the device 

described herein meets the crash test and evaluation criteria of the American Association of State 

Highway and Transportation Officials' Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH), the 

device is eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program. Eligibility for 

reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program does not establish approval or 

endorsement by the FII WA for any particular purpose or use. 

The FHWA, the Department of Transportation. and the United States Government do not 

endorse products or services and the issuance of a reimbursement eligibility letter is not an 

endorsement of any product or service. 
Requirements 

To be found eligible for Federal-aid funding, roadside safety devices should meet the crash test 

and evaluation criteria contained in the American Association of State Highway and 

Transportation Officials' Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH). 

Description 

The device and supporting documentation are described in the attached form. 

Summary and Standard Provisions 

Therefore, the system described and detailed in the attached form is eligible for reimbursement 

and may be installed under the range of conditions tested. 

Please note the following standard provisions that apply to FHW A eligibility letters: 

2 

• This letter provides a AASHTO/ARTBA/AGC Task Force 13 designator that 

should be used for the purpose of the creation of a new and/or the update of existing 

Task Force 13 drawing for posting on the on-line 'Guide to Standardized Highway 

Barrier Hardware' currently referenced in AASHTO Roadside Design Guide. 

• This finding of eligibility does not cover other structural features of the systems, 

nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 

• Any changes that may influence system conformance with MASH will require a 

new reimbursement eligibility letter. 

• Should the FHW A discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in-service 

performance reveals safety problems, or that the system is significantly different 

from the version that was crash tested, we reserve the right to modify or revoke this 

letter. 

• You are expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design 

and installation requirements to ensure proper performance. 

• You are expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has the 

same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for review, 

and that it will meet the test and evaluation criteria of the MASH. 

• To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of eligibility is designated as 

number CC-1150 and shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test 

documentation upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and 

documentation may be reviewed at our office upon request. 

• This letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHW A to use, 

manufacture, or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent 

holder. The FHW A does not become involved in issues concerning patent law. 

Patent issues, if any, are to be resolved by the applicant. 

• The Trinity SOFT-STOP Terminal is a patented product and considered proprietary. 

If proprietary systems are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid 

projects: (a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally 

suitable unpatented items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are 

essential for synchronization with the existing highway facilities or that no equally 

suitable alternative exists; or (c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive 

type of construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes. 
Enclosures 

Our regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23, Code of 

Federal Regulations, Section 635.411. 

Sincerely yours, 

Michael S. Griffith 

Director, Office of Safety Technologies 

Office of Safety 

3 
Version 4_1 (10/ll) 

Page 2 of 6 

Request for Federal Aid Rein1bursement Eligibility 

Of Highway ·safety Harchvare 

.~ Name: oc.,o_G!.ipQ~.-.: - .... 

~ Company: TR.lNl!f.HIGHWAYPRQDU~!J.:C : 

~1-----,Ar.:r.::dtlr::lres=s=-: +25~ •.. .,.,...2?_:· .:,-5-tEM-:--.:-._M-O..,.._N.S-=-_·..,..._F-REE__:.W:-A-Y.--:-;b...,._Al.lA:._ .. .,.,..·_-.. -:-.~-,lX~.~.-. _-75-.1..,....0..,.."{:- .. ~-... ::-,-.. .....,..:.--:-1 

To: MichaelS. Griffith, Din!ctor 

fHWA, Office of Safety Technologies 

I request the following devices be considered eligible for reimbursement under the Federar-aid 

highway program. 

·System Type Devke Name/Variant Testing Criterion Test 

Level 

By submitting this request for review and evaluation by the Federal Highway Administration, I certify 

that the product(s) was (were) tested in conform1ty with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety 

Hardware and that the test f evaluation results meet the appropriate evaluation criteria in the MASH_ 

ldentifkotion of the individual or o,..nha!ion respon~ble for the produ~/,~ 9) ~ ContactName: B~IAN:S~flli:, (f/. • 

Company Name: TRINh:Y._HI(;tiWAY?ROQUCTS, LLc · 

Addressl: 

o~:ro,.rx}5297 . . . City/State/Zip~ 

CountJy! 

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 

. . . . ,· r:· . --: . .. ·- , - . :- . : - . . ... . ··~ . 

. JS.re.qt•~stJ~:tO:ac~p~th:e~s-t~~~ryJ¢1e-iss l?.erqc~1J5for.th~foll~~~ng~ · . - . . . . . . ~ •, . ··~ ·. ';. '.' ~ ' . •. . . . -. ·. . . ' .. - . . - ' .. . . . .. 

. ]. .(~TG-3:5oftstqpT~~~na{wrih ~."ien~ of:so·~9ji2· .· · 2.: ,~ rr)cti.<?f.S. .fitd:~ w9<tdic$ir.lP,b.sJ~ blP'kouts. · . · · . a. Anoffs~2~orifro~t(r19ent,fla~ iaie.ofi5i1. . . . . . . . .. . 4; :Foratta~tnn~ntto S~foch/12-:lrkh bf6Cfcoutsy.stems or .no blockoutW-beam 9uardrallsystems~: . -~ . ~ . ·.. . . - ' . - - . . . . 
Version 4.1 (10/11) 

Page 1 of 5 

.. 

Ql 

t: 

e 

.a 

:I 

en 

Request for Federal Aid Reimbursement Eligibility 

Of Highway Safety Hardware 

Date of Request: April11, 2013 

Name: DonGripne 

Company: TRINITY HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, LLC 

Address: 2525 STEMMONS FREEWAY, DALLAS, TX 75207 

To: Michael S. Griffith, Director 

FHWA, Office of Safety Technologies 

I request the following devices be considered eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid 

highway program. 

System Type Device Name I Variant Testing Criterion Test 

Level 

'CC': Crash Cushions, Attenuators, & T TRINITYn-3 SOFT-STOP TERMINAL AASHTOMASH n3 

By submitting this request for review and evaluation by the Federal Highway Administration, I certify 

that the product(s) was (were) tested in conformity with the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety 

Hardware and that the test I evaluation results meet the appropriate evaluation criteria in the MASH. 

Identification of the individua I or organization responsible for the product: 

Contact Name: BRIAN SMITH 

Company Name: TRINITY HIGHWAY PRODUCTS, LLC 

Address 1: 2525 STEMMONS FREEWAY 

Address 2: 

City/State/Zip: DALLAS, TX 75207 

Country: USA 

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 

Modification to Existing Hardware Non-Significant- Effect is positive or Inconsequential 

The original crash test of the Trinity Soft Stop (TTl Crash Report 2009) as per Eligibility Letter CC-115 dated 

December 19, 2011 specified steel post and w-beam guardrail using 12-inch wood block out. The crash test 

was conducted by Texas Transportation Institute (Til) entitled NCHRP 350 Crash Testing and Evaluation of the 

Vertical Squisher' dated February 2009 (Til Crash Report 2009). 

This request is to accept the as-tested article as per CC -11 5 for the following: 

1. A MASH TL-3 Soft Stop Terminal with a length of 50'-91/2". 

2. 12 inch or 8 inch wood/composite block outs. 

3. An offset 2-foot from tangent, flare rate of 25:1. 

4. For attachment to 8-inch/12-lnch block out systems or no blackout W-beam guardrail systems. 

This modification is considered Non-significant, Effect is Positive or Inconsequential. 
CRASH TESTING 

Version 4.1 (10/11) 

Page 2 of 5 

A brief description of each crash test and its result: 

Required Test Narrative Evaluation 

Number Description Results 

As per Til Crash Report 2009, an 11 OOC (2425 1 b) passenger car impacting 

the terminal end-on at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mi/h and 

0 degree, respectively, with the quarter point of the vehicle aligned with 

the center line of the nose of the terminal. This test is primarily intended 

to evaluate occupant risk and vehicle trajectory criteria. The SOFT -STOP 

slowed and redirected the 11 OOC vehicle. No occupant compartment 

3-30 (1100() deformation occurred. The 1100C vehicle remained upright during and WAIVER REQUES 

after the collision event. Maximum roll was 25 degrees, and maximum 

pitch was 7 degrees. Occupant risk factors were within the limits specified 

for MASH test 3-30. The vehicle subsequently came to rest 27 feet 

downstream of impact and 34 feet toward traffic lanes. The SOFT-STOP 

performed acceptably according to the evaluation criteria of MASH test 

3-30. 

As per Til Crash Report 2009, A 2270P (5000 I b) pickup truck impacting 

the terminal end-on at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mi/h and 

0 degree, respectively, with the center line of the vehicle aligned with the 

center line of the nose of the terminal. This test is primarily intended to 

evaluate occupant risk and vehicle trajectory criteria. The SOFT-STOP 

3-31 (2270P) brought the 2270P vehicle to a controlled stop. No occupant WAIVER REQUES compartment deformation occurred. The 2270P vehicle remained upright 

during and after the collision event. Maximum roll was 4 degrees, and 

maximum pitch was -3 degrees. Occupant risk factors were within the 

limits specified for MASH test 3-31. The 2270P vehicle came to rest within 

the installation. The SOFT-STOP performed acceptably according to the 

evaluation criteria of MASH test 3-31. 

As per Til Crash Report 2009, an 11 OOC (24251 b) passenger car impacting 

the terminal end-on at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mph and 

5/15 degrees, respectively, with the center line of the vehicle aligned with 

the center line of the nose of the terminal. This test is primarily intended 

to evaluate occupant risk and vehicle trajectory criteria. The SOFT -STOP 

slowed and stopped the 11 OOC vehicle. No occupant compartment 

3-32 (1100C) deformation occurred. The 1100C vehicle remained upright during and WAIVER REQUES 

after the collision event. Maximum roll was 28 degrees, and maximum 

pitch was -26 degrees. Occupant risk factors were within the limits 

specified for MASH test 3-32. The vehicle subsequently came to rest 

with the front of the vehicle adjacent to post 4 of the terminal, with most 

of the vehicle toward the field side. The SOFT -STOP performed 

acceptably according to the evaluation criteria of MASH test 3-32. 

As per Til Crash Report 2009, the 2000P vehicle, traveling at an impact 

speed of 62.7 mi/h, impacted the nose of the Vertical Squisher end-on at 

an impact angle of 16.3 degrees. At 0.044 s after impact, the head ofthe 

terminal began to move along the rail, and at 0.093 s, the 2000P vehicle 

began to redirect toward the field side. The front right tire contacted the 

3-33 (2270P) terminal at 0.207 s. The vehicle began to travel parallel with the guardrail WAIVER REQUES at 0.285 s, at a speed of 48.2 mi/h (77.6 km/h). At 0.372 s, the 2000P 

vehicle overrode the terminal and lost contact with the guardrail and was 

traveling at an exit speed and angle of 51.7 mi/h (83.2 km/h) and 1.8 

degrees, respectively. After completely exiting the installation, the 2000P 

vehicle partially traversed a steep mound of soil and came to rest on its 

right side 242ft downstream and 30ft toward the field side. 
Required Test 

Number 

3-34(1100C) 

3-35 (2270P) 

3-36 (2270P) 

3-37 (2270P) 

Version 4.1 (10/11) 

Page 3 of S 

Narrative Evaluation 

Description Results 

As per TTl Crash Report 2009, an 11 OOC (2425 1 b) passenger car impacting 

the terminal at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mi/h and 15 

degrees, respectively, with the comer of the vehicle bumper aligned with 

the critical impact point (CIP) ofthe length of need (LON) of the 

terminal. This test Is primarily intended to evaluate occupant risk and 

vehicle trajectory criteria. The SOFT-STOP contained and redirected the 

11 OOC vehicle. The vehicle did not penetrate or override the installation. 

Maximum dynamic deflection was 1.96 feet and the head fed through 6.2 WAIVER REQUES feet of w-beam rail element. Maximum occupant compartment 

deformation was 1.0 inch inward in the area of the instrument panel on 

the left side. The 11 OOC vehicle remained upright during and after the 

collision event. Maximum roll was 1 0 degrees, and maximum pitch was -4 

degrees. Occupant risk factors were within the limits specified for MASH 

test 3-34. The vehicle subsequently came to rest 15 feet toward traffic 

lanes in front of post 8. The SOFT -STOP performed acceptably according 

to the evaluation criteria of MASH test 3-34. 

As perm Crash Report 2009, a 2270P (5000 lb) pickup truck impacting 

the terminal at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mi/h and 25 

degrees, respectively, with the comer of the vehicle bumper aligned with 

the beginning of the LON of the terminal. This test is primarily intended to 

evaluate structural adequacy and vehicle trajectory criteria. The SOFTSTOP contained and redirected the 2270P. The vehicle did not under ride 

or override the installation. Although thew-beam rail anchorage released 

late in the impact event, the vehicle did not penetrate the installation. 

While the vehicle was in contact with thew-beam, the maximum dynamic WAIVER REQUES deflection was I 0.4 feet. However, the upstream anchor released 

and as the vehicle lost contact with thew-beam, thew-beam continued 

to deflect, reaching a maximum displacement of 11.6 feet. The kickpanel 

of the left side was deformed inward 0.4 inch. The 2270P vehicle 

remained upright during and after the collision event. Maximum roll was 

-30 degrees, and maximum pitch was -12 degrees. Occupant risk factors 

were within the preferred limits specified for MASH test 3-31. The 2270P 

vehicle exited within the exit box. The SOFT -STOP performed acceptably 

according to the evaluation criteria of MASH test 3-35. 

As per TTl Crash Report 2009, a 2270P (5000 I b) pickup truck impacting 

the terminal at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mi/h and 25 

degrees, respectively, with the comer of the vehicle bumper aligned with 

the CIP with respect to the transition to the stiff barrier or backup 

structure. As a w-beam guardrail terminal, the SOFT-STOP will never be 

attached directly to a backup structure, and the transition to a stiff barrier WAIVER REQUES 

is basically at Post 3. Therefore, Trinity feels that Test 3-36 is irrelevant and 

was therefore not conducted. 

Eligibility Letter CC-11 5 indicated that MASH test 3-36 may be waived 

because the SOFT-STOP will not be connected to any stiffer device than 

W -beam guardrail. 

As perm Crash Report 2009, a 2270P (5000 I b) pickup truck impacting 

the terminal at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mi/h and 25 

degrees, respectively, mid-point between the nose and the end of the 

terminal in the reverse direction. This test is intended to evaluate the 

performance of a terminal for a "reverse" hit. However, researchers at TTl WAIVER REQUES believe that the reverse direction impact would be more critical for the 

11 OOC (2425 lb) passenger car than for the 2270P pickup. Therefore, an 

11 OOC (2425 lb) passenger car was used in Test 3-37. 

Eligibility Letter CC -115 indicated that the substitution of the 11 OOC 

vehicle to evaluate the reverse direction impact was appropriate. 
Version 4.1 (10/11) 

Page 4 of 5 

As per Til Crash Report 2009, a 1 SOOA (33071 b) passenger car impacting 

the terminal end-on at a nominal impact speed and angle of 62 mi/h and 

0 degree, respectively, with the center line of the vehicle aligned with the 

center line of the nose of the terminal. This test is primarily intended to 

evaluate the performance of the staged anenuator/terminal when 

impacted by a mid-size vehicle. The SOFT-STOP is not a staged device. 

Therefore Test3-38 was not conducted. However, as per Appendix G of 

3-38 (1500A) MASH, calculations based on Test 3-31 have been performed to predict WAIVER REQUES the occupant risk values for the 1500A (33071 b) vehicle. The results of 

these calculations (shown on the enclosed document) predict that in 

crash testing with the 1500A (33071 b) vehicle, the SOFT-STOP Terminal, 

would perform acceptably according to the Test Level 3 (TL-3) evaluation 

criteria set out in the MASH guidelines for terminals. 

Eligibility Lener CC-115 indicates t hat test 3-38 is not necessary because 

the SOFT-STOP is not a staged device and that manufacturers calculations 

predict crash worthy performance with the 1 500A vehicle. 

3-40 (1 1 OOC) Does not apply to non-gating/energy absorbing devices. 

3-41 (2270P) Does not apply to non-gating/energy absorbing devices. 

3-42 (1 100() Does not apply to non-gating/energy absorbing devices. 

3-43 (2270P) Does not apply to non-gating/energy absorbing devices. 

3-44 (2270P) Does not apply to non-gating/energy absorbing devices. 

3-45 (1500A) Does not apply to non-gating/energy absorbing devices. 

Full Scale Crash Testing was done in compliance with MASH by the fo llowing accredit ed crash test 

laboratory (cite the laboratory's accreditation status as noted in the crash t est reports.): 

Laboratory Name: Texas Transportation Institute 

Laboratory Contact: Dean Alberson 

Address: 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX. 77843-3135 

Country: USA 

Accredit ation Certificat e Mechanical 2821.01, Current date April 30, 2013 

Number and Date: 

ATTACHMENTS 

Attach to this form: 

1) A copy of the Test Data Summary Sheet for each test conducted in support of this request. 

2) A drawing or drawings of t he device(s) that conform to the Task Force-13 Drawing Specifications 

[Hardware Guide Drawing Standards]. For proprietary products, a single isometric line drawing is 

usually acceptable to illustrate the product, with detailed specifications, intended use, and contact 

information provided on the reverse. Additional drawings (not in TF-13 fo rmat) show ing details that 

are key to underst anding the performance of th e device should also be submitted to facilitate our 

review. 
FHWA Official Business Only: 

Eligibility Letter 

Number Date 

CC-1150 April22, 2013 

AASHTOTF13 

Designator 

SEW22 

Key Words 

Version 4.1 (10/11) 

Page 5 of 5 

TL3, non-gating/energy absorbing terminal, 

tensioned wbeam guardrail terminal, steel yielding 

terminal posts, deflector term ina I head. 
.,4'ill "lSI~ J (i.-J) LL...CTI1 'Y T.I\Nf'o' Scf~;; ~ 

!.t-Jf/"1" 

1'-T 1'-T 

Lc ~----------------------------------------~"r--------------~----------------~ 

liDO 

l)lllllRID~ASSIIIUIIo\NUAI. 

2) ~ IS A IWII liSt LNI. J (IL-l) liD li[A!IDT, 

POm"'~ 

J) r COP PWilC OfF!lT 11.00<$ (flflUI!Ii) 1>1/l oiiXI1T>IU A-m. lllllliiiG.T IVoD AND IIJl 

4) IH[- IOAIUAC1U2111 SUCIIS1S MltiD II)-li!NC1lllillA!a. IF --·?fi~~=-' 

SECTION "C-C (IGSISfl"ill) 

FOST fl "' 15203 ('ID&Il.~ . 

fOST"' ISIIID , •• ll.~ 

DETAIL "C" (FOSifl, ___ , 

DO IIDT AnAOt 1M 

r-r--...t:,--..;,•r-:' POST P 

SECTION "8-B" 

(FOSfp) 

-fQST"' ••• s 

DETAIL "B" 

(AI .IIOtCII FOSIIJ l 

DETAIL "A" 

1••--IJ) 

L. 

DETAIL "D" (I'OSTfl) 

1111NITY SoltStop TEIMNAl (8" Bl.OCKS} 

PLAN, El.£VA n())f & SECllON 

MASH TEST lE\U J (ll-J) 

TRNITY HIGHWAY Pi!ODUCTS. UC. 

---· DAlW. ll '1!2117 
WA!li n~T l[\'H J (rl.-J) UloC"H OJ ~"'f' St.l~\1~" HrN.N.AL 

~-111/'1" 

1110 

l)IIIJlliiO-AS!IIB.TJIMijAI. 

I) - IIA 0AS11 1ISf 1N1. J (lL-J) Ill) litAIIDT. 

J) 12" DID' I\JIS1lC cmrt IIJlCZS (IM[D) 16% NXIPtiiU AL!WIOU 

., --SUfXU1S QISTtiiR 10-IUIK1ai!LIIIQII Of IICIIJ>IJJOI. 

1'1111;~ ,_,1 .... 

.allSI'IIWO 

CIIOUII)sna/1 "'fmJ IMIOIIIOI.IICAD ~~~ .. n~:;=IIOI.' A110 11/1 

I'OST(ll'lll»CJ 

(II•~ • 

DETAIL "C" 

(PCIITfi.--GiiWCI) 

CO lilT ATW>t W. 

~II'OSTP, 

OCIIII'II we 1111~ 

POSTI'II150CIO 

••·r.~ 

"' .:. ,.., 

.:. 

Lc L . 

IIA~ ~:JYJ;MIIOI.' ct.aT..: AI W:t:O U'GI EAT NlAD MD llln 

Q~'=' 

DETAIL "B" 

(Al-FOS'IfO) 

-CI-..a.I'IIWCO IIAI'IDC !cOSt:o ~ 

(rUIUl) -- -~ 

T~ '=!:z~t.ciE::J lJ. 

SECTION "C-C 

I FQilS fJ -Ill 

SECTION "B-B" 

( I'05T fO) 

DETAIL "A" (AT-I'OSTfO) 

51!1'• I I 1/'F 10 It) 1101.1 llllt JUIAII) OSIDS 

J.OaJIIIOI.T IIIAO Alii ICUT 

1'05Tfli'IIJ5m t-- ...... --

DETAIL "D" ( FOST fl) 

lR!NllY SofiSiop TERUIMAL (12" BlOCKS) 

PlAN, n£VA 1lON &: SECTION 

UASH lEST l.E\a J (Tl-J) 

1'RIHITY HlGMWAY PROOUCTS, UC. 

---· IIAUAS,11'1S201 

... mae 
r;.~ ; ::::.!!'.~1'..::.-~ r:_...-..~"M .. O!I:!I!!!IIP.~- ..,.-,_.,_ 

·~··.\t:l 

\HIIIl.J0.000 s 

\"of 

~ 

I 

General lnlonnetlon 

..... . ,. 

0.137 

.. ,. 

r ---l"!'f"'\ QD ~·· , 1\'l-nlot!l. "' ,., :Ut.IJ \T &I •I \1"11 • "11'.\1 I 

Test Agency ............................. Te118!1 Transportation lnsUtute 

Test No ................................... 400001-TSQ1 

Dale ......................................... 2009-10.01 

Test Article 

Type ................ '" ...................... Terminal 

Name ....................................... Ver1ically Loacfmg Terminal (VI.. T) 

Installation Length ................... 151.75 ft 

Mll1erial or Key Elements ........ 311n tall 12 ga ~am, steel posts 

Soli Type and Condition ........... StandaRI Soil, Damp 

TGfit Vehicle 

TypeJDeslgnelion ..................... 2270P 

Make and Model ...................... 2003 Dodge Ram 1500 quad-cab pickup 

CUib ......................................... 4708 lb 

Test Inertial.............................. 5028 1b 

Dummy .................................... No dummy 

Grass Sialic ••...•.....••...•••.•••...••• 50281b 

i 

. 

•• I' •• ,.w· 

·····- .. _.,. ... ,.. 

Impact Conditions 

Speed ................................... .&3.5 mllh 

Angle .................................... 26.4 degrees 

LocaUonfOitentation .••......•••• At Post 3 

EldtCon~ns 

Speed ................................... .out of view 

Angla ••••••.•.•••.•..................•••• .out of view 

Occupant RJsk Vatuoe 

Impact Velocity 

Longitudinal ........................ 15.8 ftls 

Laleral ................................ 14.4 ftls 

Ridadown Aalalerations 

L.onglludinal ........................ -11.0 G 

Lateral ................................ 7.9 G 

THIV ..................................... 21.0 kmlh 

PHD ....................................... 11.6G 

Max. 0.050-s Awrage 

Longltudlnal ........................ -4.7 G 

Lateral ................................ 5.0 G 

VCifllcal ............................... 2.5 G 

t t 

Post-Impact Trajectory 

....... .. -... 

SIDpplng Dlslance ......................... 62.5 ft dwnslrm 

9.4 ft lwd ltaffic 

Vohlcle Stability 

Mulmum Yaw Angle..................... 74 degrees 

Maximum Pitch Angle .................... -12 degrees 

Maximum Roll Angle ...................... -3D degrees 

Vehids Snaoolng. .......................... No 

Vehicle Pockellng .......................... No 

TeS1 Anlde Deflections 

Dynamlc ......................................... 11.6 ft 

Permanent ..................................... 11.2 ft 

Wotlclng Width ............................... 10.4 ft 

Vohldo Damage 

ws ............................................... 11LFQ4 

CDC ............................................... 11FDEW3 

Max. Extarior DerormaUon ............. 16.0 Inches 

Max. Occupant Compartment 

Dero:malion ............................. o.4 Inch 

Summary of results for MASH test 3-35 on the VL T. 
n 

General Information 

Test Agency ............................. Tmcas Transpol1alion Institute 

Test No ................................... 4000D1·TS06 

Dale ......................................... 2010.01-06 

Test Article 

Type ......................................... Tennlnal 

. -. 

Nama ....................................... Vertically loading Terminal (Vl T) 

Installation Long1h ................... 151.75 ft 

Material or Key Elements ........ 311n laU 12 ga w-beam. steel posts 

Soil Type and Cond~n ........... S1andard Soil, Damp 

TeatVehlclo 

Typell)eslgnallu ..................... 2270P 

Make ami Model ...................... 2003 Dodgo Ram 1 SOU quad-cab pickup 

Curb ......................................... 46951b 

Test Inertial .............................. 49581b 

Dummy .................................... No dummy 

GftiSS Sialic ............................. 49581b 

Impact Condld11ns 

Speed ................................... .60.9 milh 

Angle ..................................... 7.3 deglves 

Localion/Orientalion .•••••..•.••• .Enlkn 

Exit Conditione 

Speed •••.•••••••...•..•••.•.•••••.••••.• .OUt of view 

Angle .••••••••••..•.••..•.......•••••.•... Out of view 

Occupant Rbik Vl:lfUH 

Impact Velocity 

Longi1Udlnal •••••••••••••••.•.•...• .21.0 ftls 

Lalend ................................ 3.0 ftls 

Rldodovm Acculerallons 

longiWdinal ........................ -9.5 G 

Lateral ................................ 3.8 G 

THIV ..................................... .23.3kmll'l 

PHD ....... "" ........................ - •• 9.7 G 

Max. 0.050-s AY818!J8 

longlludlnaJ,., .. ,,, .. .,,., .... ,mol'7.3 G 

Lateral ................................ 2.8 G 

Vettk:al ............................... -3.1 G 

.. .,.,.,. ........ _ ::-:.-:: . 

Poat.Jmpad TraJectory 

Stopping Distanm ......................... 28 ft dwnslnn 

Adjcnl to field llkle 

Vehicle StabJIJty 

Maximum Yaw Angle ..................... as degrees 

Maximum Pilch Angle.................... 5 degrees 

Maldmum Roll Angle ...................... -21 degrees 

Vehlde Snagging ............... "" ......... No 

Vehlde Podceling .......................... No 

Test Article Deflections Dynamic......................................... 2.0 ft 

Pennane~ ..................................... 2.0 ft 

Working WidU'I ............................... 14.7 ft 

Vehlde Dl:lmage 

VDS ............................................... 12FC5 

CDC ............................................... 12FCEN4 

Max. Exterior Defonnatllm ............. 17.75 lndlas 

Max. Oc:c:upant Compaltment 

Defolmallon ............................. 0 

Summary of results for MASH test 3-33 on the VLT. 
... 

, ... .. r!Sj"' 1-. ""tr.· •• 

GenonJllnfonnatlon 

Test Agency ............................. Texas Transportation Institute 

Test No ................................... 400001-TS07 

Date •..••..••••.••....••••••.••••...••••.••.• 201()-()1-12 

TwtArtlclo 

Type •••••••••••.••.......•........•.••..•..•• Telminal 

Name ....................................... Veftit:ally l..oading Tonninal (Vl T) 

lns1allalion Length ••·•·••••·•••••••·• 151.75 ft Material or Key Bamonts •.••••.. 311n ta!l12 ga w-beam. steel pos1s 

SoU 1)pe ond Condition ........... Stamfa!d So~. Damp 

Test Velllclo 

Typell)llli;nallon ..................... 2270P 

Make and Modal ...................... 2002 Dodge Ram 1500 quad-<:ab pickup 

CUrb ......................................... 5024 lb 

Test lneltlal .............................. 5084 lb 

Dummy .................................... No dummy 

Gross S1DIIc ............................. 50841b 

., ... , . ........ 

_, .. ~~w~~~ 

-,------t . . + •· . \.. '.. . ~ : ...... , .. ; ;- ........... l I t I 

Impact Conditions 

Speed ................................... .81.1 mllh 

Angle ..................................... 1 A degrees 

LocatloniOrlantatlon ............. .Enlkm 

EDt Conditions 

Speed ................................... .out of view 

Angle .................................... .5.0 degrees 

Occupant Risk Values 

Impact Valllcity 

Longltudlnal ....................... 20.0 Ills 

Lalarlll ............ .................... 0.0 fils 

Ridedown Accelerations 

Longltudlnal ........................ -8.6 G 

Lataral ................................ -2.3 G 

THIV ..................................... .21.8 kmlh 

PHD ....................................... 8.6G 

Max. 0.050-s Avensga 

Longltudlnel ....................... .-5.0 G 

Lateral ................................ .0.8 G 

Valtlcal ............................... 2.3 G 

Post.wpact Trajectory 

Stopping Dlstance ......................... 37.5 ft dwnstnn 

Over posts 6-7 

Vehicle SIDblllty 

Maximum Yaw Angle..................... 3 degrees 

MaJ0murn Pl!c:h Angle .................... -3 degrees 

Maximum RoD Angle ...................... 4 degrees 

Vehicle Snagging ........................... No 

Vehlde Podcelin!J •••••..•....•••.......••.. No 

Test Article DoftGctlons 

Dynamic. ........................................ 45.7 ft 

Pennanen\ ..................................... 45.7 ft 

WoJtdng Wllflh ............................... 4.4 ft 

VCihlde Damage 

VDS ............................................... 12FC5 

CDC ............................................... 12FCEN4 

Max. Exterior Dehlrmallon ............. 17.0 inches 

Max. Occupant Compal1ment 

Darormation ............................. 0 

Summary of results for MASH test 3-31 on the VL T.