alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sally A. KEENAN, Appellant, v. GAMBLE ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida corporation, d/b/a Florida Personnel Service, Appellee.

No. K-424.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

July 3, 1969.

P. Donald DeHoff, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Robert E. Hucker, Jacksonville, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 5, 2019

t0329 

# Order

Clerk April 5, 2019

157667 & (47)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant/

Cross

- Appellee,

v SC: 157667

COA: 336550

Kent CC: 93

- 064278

- FC

GREGORY WINES,

Defendant

- Appellee/

Cross

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 8, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross

appellant are considered and

, it appearing to this Court that the case of People v Turner

(Docket No. 158068) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that

case may resolve an issue raised in the present applications for leave to appeal, we

ORDER that the applications be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3229 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3229

 To prohibit Federal agencies from restricting the use of convertible 
  virtual currency by a person to purchase goods or services for the 
               person's own use, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 6, 2023

   Mr. Budd introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit Federal agencies from restricting the use of convertible 
  virtual currency by a person to purchase goods or services for the 
               person's own use, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON RESTRICTING USE OF CONVERTIBLE VIRTUAL 
              CURRENCY BY A PERSON TO PURCHASE GOODS OR SERVICES FOR 
              THE PERSON'S OWN USE.

    (a) In General.--No agency head may prohibit or otherwise restrict 
the ability of a covered user to--
            (1) use virtual currency or its equivalent for such user's 
        own purposes, such as to purchase real or virtual goods and 
        services for the user's own use; or
            (2) conduct transactions through a self-hosted wallet.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Convertible virtual currencies.--A medium of exchange 
        that--
                    (A) has an equivalent value as currency (as defined 
                in section 1010.100 of title 31, Code of Federal 
                Regulations (or successor regulations)); or
                    (B) acts as a substitute for currency but may not 
                possess all the attributes (including legal tender 
                status) specified under such section 1010.100.
            (2) Covered user.--The term ``covered user'' means a person 
        that obtains convertible virtual currency to purchase goods or 
        services on that person's own behalf, without regard to the 
        method in which such covered user obtained such convertible 
        virtual currency.
            (3) Self-hosted wallet.--The term ``self-hosted wallet'' 
        means an interface--
                    (A) used to secure and transfer convertible virtual 
                currency; and
                    (B) under which the owner of convertible virtual 
                currency retains independent control over such 
                convertible virtual currency that is secured by such 
                digital interface.
                                 <all>
```
#### Roger R. MARTIN, Appellant, v. Henrietta A. MARTIN, Appellee.

No. 70-179.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 25, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stewart F. LaMotte, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
No. 00-7107.

#### Barahl *v.*Yukins, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Objective Communications, Inc. (a development stage enterprise) on Form S-3
(File No. 333-20625), Form S-8 (File No. 333-49763) and Form S-8 (File No.
333-49765) of our report dated February 26, 1999, except for Note 14, as to
which the date is April 14, 1999, on our audits of the financial statements of
Objective Communications, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the
years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 and for the period October 5, 1993
(date of inception) to December 31, 1998, which report is included in Objective
Communications, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A.



                                                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
July 26, 1999
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with IA Global, Inc.s (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian Hoekstra, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.  This certification is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.  /s/ Brian Hoekstra Brian Hoekstra Chief Executive Officer August 16, 2010  In connection with IA Global, Inc.s (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Scott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.  This certification is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.  /s/ Mark Scott Mark Scott Chief Financial Officer August 16, 2010
Exhibit 4.1   Form of Irrevocable Proxy Granted to Chief Executive Officer dated
              January 30 or 31, 2003

                                IRREVOCABLE PROXY

The  undersigned  shareholder  ("Holder")  of  Quintek  Technologies,   Inc.,  a
California  corporation  (the  "Company"),  hereby  irrevocably  (to the fullest
extent permitted by law) grants the Chief Executive Officer  (currently,  Robert
Steele)  of the  Company  the full  power to vote and  exercise  all  voting and
related  rights (to the full extent that the  undersigned  is entitled to do so)
with  respect  to all of the  shares of capital  stock of the  Company  that are
beneficially  owned  by the  undersigned,  and  any  and  all  other  shares  or
securities of the Company  issued or issuable in respect  thereof as of the date
hereof (the "Record Date") (collectively,  the "Shares"), in accordance with the
terms of this Proxy. The Shares  beneficially  owned by Holder as of the date of
this Proxy are listed on Schedule 1 to this Proxy.

This  Proxy is  irrevocable  (to the  fullest  extent  permitted  by law),  and,
pursuant to California Corporation Code Section 705 is granted by the Holder (a)
to secure the performance of the Chief Executive  Officer's duties as an officer
of the  Company,  and (b) in  consideration  of  ________ ' s twelve  (12) month
employment  agreement.  As used in this Proxy, the term "Expiration  Date" shall
mean such time as 12 months from the Record Date.

The Chief Executive Officer of the Company is hereby authorized and empowered by
the  undersigned,  at any  time  prior  to the  Expiration  Date,  to act as the
undersigned's attorney and proxy to vote all of Holder's Shares, and to exercise
all voting, consent and similar rights of the undersigned.

         Any obligation of the  undersigned  hereunder shall be binding upon the
         successors and assigns of the undersigned.  This Proxy shall terminate,
         and  be  of  no  further  force  and  effect,  automatically  upon  the
         Expiration Date.

Dated: ____________, 2003
                                           _____________________________________
                                           Signature
                                           _____________________________________
                                           Print Name
                                           _____________________________________
                                           _____________________________________
                                           Address


                                           Company Capital Stock:  _____________
                                           Common Stock:________________________
                                           Company Options:_____________________
                                           Company Warrants:____________________
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of NeoGenomics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ Douglas M. VanOort                              
|                     |  |  |  | Douglas M. VanOort                                  
|                     |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 6, 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ George Cardoza                                  
|                     |  |  |  | George Cardoza                                      
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer                             
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 6, 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ Edwin F. Weidig III                             
|                     |  |  |  | Edwin F. Weidig III                                 
|                     |  |  |  | Director of Finance and Principal Accounting Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is
not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic
version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



32
BERNARD C. MCGEE

,

Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL D. CREWS, SECRETARY, FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 4688

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 23, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. James C. Hankinson , Judge

.

Bernard C. McGee, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS

, C.J., BENTON and MARSTILLER

, J J

. , CONCUR.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                  List of Subsidiaries, as of December 18, 2001
                  ---------------------------------------------

       Key Technology, Inc., an Oregon corporation (the Registrant)
         .  Key Technology FSC, Inc., a Guam corporation
         .  Key Technology Holdings USA LLC, an Oregon limited liability company
            .  Suplusco Holding B.V., a Netherlands corporation
               .  Key Technology B.V., a Netherlands corporation
         .  Key Technology AMVC LLC, an Oregon limited liability company
            .  Applied Laser Systems, Inc., a California corporation
            .  ARC Netherlands B.V., a Netherlands corporation

                                       58
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Fresh Breath
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6 mons
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-30-99
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-00
<CASH>                                         599
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               599
<PP&E>                                         5,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,976)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          93,120
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       11,748
<OTHER-SE>                                     (100,519)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,349
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,638
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9,634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (132,272)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (132,272)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)





</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Hollywood Entertainment
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/S/ F. Bruce Giesbrecht                   /S/ Timothy R. Price
-------------------------                 --------------------------
F. Bruce Giesbrecht                       Timothy R. Price
President and Chief                       Chief Financial Officer
Executive Officer


Dated: March 15, 2005
NO. 90-155 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

1991 

GILT EDGE MINING CORPORATION, 

a Delaware Corporation; and 

BLUE RANGE MINING CO., a corporation, 

Plaintiffs and Respondents, 

GOLDEN MAPLE MINING AND LEACHING CO., INC., 

a corporation, 

Defendant and Respondent, 

and 

SERONA RESOURCES CORPORATION, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Tenth Judicial District, 

In and for the County of Fergus, 

The Honorable John Warner, Judge presiding. 

COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

For Appellant: 

Robert L. Johnson, Lewistown, Montana 

For Respondent: 

James M. Regnier; Regnier, Lewis & Boland; Great 

Falls, Montana 

Jon A. Oldenburg, Lewistown, Montana 

Patricia OtBrien Cotter; Cotter & Cotter; Great 

Falls, Montana 

Filed: 

Submitted on Briefs: December 20, 1990 

Decided: February 1, 1991 

iP 

f 

Clerk 
Justice R. C. McDonough delivered the Opinion of the Court. 

Serona Resources Corporation appeals an order of the Tenth 

Judicial District, Fergus County, granting an order of summary 

judgment in favor of plaintiffs/respondents Gilt Edge Mining 

Corporation and Blue Range Mining Company. 

Rule 56 (c) , M.R.Civ.P., states that summary judgment shall be 

granted upon request, "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to 

interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the 

affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any 

material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment 

as a matter of law." Serona Resources, as a sublessee, maintains 

that it has a right to mine certain claims owned by 

plaintiffs/respondents. However, it is uncontested that the lease 

between Gilt Edge Mining Corporation and Golden Maple Mining 

Company, who purportedly subleased the claim to Serona, required 

Gilt Edge's written consent before any sublease would be valid. 

This consent was not given by Gilt Edge; nor is there any evidence 

that Gilt Edge acquiesced to the sublease or otherwise waived its 

rights under the lease agreement with Golden Maple. It is 

therefore clear, this sublease is not binding upon the 

plaintiffs/respondents as a matter of law. Section 70-26-103, MCA. 

The District Court's order granting summary judgment is affirmed. 

Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court 

Operating Rules, this decision shall not be cited as precedent and 

shall be published by its filing as a public document with the 

Clerk of this Court and by a report of its result to West 

publishing Company. 

Let remittitur issue forthwith. 

Justice / /
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 13, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00762

- CR

Jason Robert VANWINKLE

, Appellant

v

.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR

- 14

- 0000041 Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The Appellant ’ s brief is due April 20, 2015.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of April, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27226]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL GAMBLING IMPACT STUDY COMMISSION


Meeting

AGENCY: National Gambling Impact Study Commission.

    Time and Date: Friday, October 31, 1997, 9:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Place: The meeting site will be: The Grand Ballroom, Washington 
Dulles Airport Hilton, 13869 Park Center Road, Herndon, VA 20171.
    Status: The meeting will be open to the public from 9:30 a.m. to 
3:00 p.m., except that the meeting will be closed to the public from 
11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. for the purposes of considering internal 
personnel rules and practices and to allow for discussion of 
information of a personal nature during the consideration of hiring 
staff. Accordingly, it has been determined that this portion of the 
meeting will concern matters within sections 552b(c)(2) and (6) of 
Title 5, United States Code, and will be duly closed to public 
participation.
    Notice: At its third public meeting, the National Gambling 
Impact Study Commission, established under Public Law 104-169, dated 
August 3, 1996, will hear presentations from the National Research 
Council and the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations; 
receive an update from the Research Subcommittee; discuss the 
workplan; consider any nominee(s) for executive director; discuss 
the rules of operation; and review rules for upcoming public 
comment.
    Contact Persons: For further information, contact Amy Ricketts 
at (202) 523-8217 or write to 800 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 
450, Washington, D.C. 20002.
Kay C. James,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 97-27226 Filed 10-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-ET-P