alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 54121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27517]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Meeting

SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary is 
announcing a public meeting of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public 
Advisory Group.

DATES: November 4-5, 1997, at 8:30 a.m.

ADDRESS: Fourth floor conference room, 645 ``G'' Street, Anchorage, 
Alaska.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Mutter, Department of the 
Interior, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance, 1689 ``C'' 
Street, Suite 119, Anchorage, Alaska, (907) 271-5011.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Public Advisory Group was created by 
Paragraph V.A.4 of the Memorandum of Agreement and Consent Decree 
entered into by the United States of America and the State of Alaska on 
August 27, 1991, and approved by the United States District Court for 
the District of Alaska in settlement of United States of America v. 
State of Alaska, Civil Action No. A91-081 CV. The agenda will include a 
discussion of the restoration reserve fund.
Willie R. Taylor,
Director, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 97-27517 Filed 10-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RG-P
April 19, 2004 

Refer to: HSA-10/LS-57 

Mr. Bob Sik 

Vice President 

Akron Foundry Company 

2728 Wingate Avenue 

P.O. Box 27028 

Akron, Ohio 44319-0009 

Dear Mr. Sik: 

Thank you for your letter dated March 24 requesting Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) 

acceptance of a modification to your company’s TB1-17 breakaway cast aluminum transformer 

base for use on the National Highway System under the provisions of National Cooperative 

Highway Research Program Report 350 “Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance 

Evaluation of Highway Features.” 

You requested that we find the TB1-17 base acceptable when used on a 13-1⁄2 inch bolt circle 

with a modified stack pack washer arrangement. This change is requested to accommodate the 

State of Nebraska in order to retrofit existing poles (currently installed on failing frangible 

couplings) mounted on 13 1⁄2 inch bolt circles. 

We have reviewed the results of prior crash testing of the TB1-17 bases, which had been found 

acceptable when used with up to 13 inch bolt circles, and concur that this minor modification 

would have no significant impact on the breakaway performance of your company’s transformer 

bases. All appropriate conditions in the previous FHWA acceptance letters dealing with Akron 

Foundry cast aluminum transformer bases continue to apply. 

Sincerely yours, 

 

 /Original Signed by/ 

 

John R. Baxter, P.E. 

Director, Office of Safety Design 

 Office of Safety 

FHWA:HSA-10:NArtimovich:tb:x61331:4/15/04 

File: h://directory folder/nartimovich/LS57-AkronFIN 

cc: HSA-10 (Reader, HSA-1; Chron File, HSA-10; 

 N. Artimovich, HSA-10)
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**INSWEB CORPORATION**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of InsWeb Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of theundersigned, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to InsWeb Corporation, and will be retained by InsWeb Corporation andfurnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| **/s/ HUSSEIN A. ENAN**               | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------|------------|
| Hussein  A. Enan                      |
| Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |
| Dated:  August 11, 2005               |
|                                  |
|                                  |
| **/s/ WILLIAM D.GRIFFIN**             | ** ** |
| William  D. Griffin                   |
| Chief  Financial Officer              |
| Dated  : August 11, 2005              |

 

1

----
Section 906 Certification - CFO



Exhibit 10.2 
 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
 
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Matrix Service Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on form 10-Q for the period
ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Bradley S. Vetal, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge: 
 

	  	 3.	  	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

	  	 4.	  	 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


 
This certification is deemed to accompany this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, but is not deemed “filed” for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise. 
 


 
Michael J. Hall 
Vice President – Financial 
And Chief Financial Officer 
October 10, 2002 
 

-20-
#### Ulysses BYRD v. STATE ATTORNEY’S OFFICE OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, Florida.

No. 38955.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





CERTIFICATION
      OF SOLE REMAINING OFFICER-DIRECTOR





In
      connection with this Quarterly Report of *GYK
      Ventures, Inc.* ,
      a
      Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-QSB for June 30, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dan
      Sifford, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 15, 2005


/s/J.
      Dan Sifford
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

BENNIE E. BARNES, ) 

Plaintiff, ) 

v. 

) 

) Civil Action No. 05-1 12 Erie 

) STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., ) 

Defendant. ) 

) 

MEMORANDUM ORDER 

Plaintiff's civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on April 11, 

2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for 

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The magistrate judge's report and recornmenda,tion, filed on November 29, 2005, 

recommended that this action be dismissed as legally frivolous in accordance with 28 

U.S.C. § 191 5(d). The parties were allowed ten (1 0) days from the date of service to 

file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail at SCI Albion, Plaintiff's 

address of record, and on the Defendant. No objections were filed. After de novo 

review of the complaint and documents in the case, together with the report and 

recommendation, the following order is entered: 

AND NOW, .this 21" day of December, 2005; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within action be dismissed as legally 

frivolous in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). 

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated 

November 29, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the court. 

S/ SEAN J. McLAUGHLlN 

Un~ted States D~strict Judge 

cc: all parties of record 

Case 1:05-cv-00112-SJM-SPB Document 20 Filed 12/21/05 Page 1 of 1
#### John Thomas PRIMM, Appellant, v. ARCHIE DAVIS, INC., a Florida corporation, Ozell Debose and Dempsey Wingo, Appellees.

No. M-51.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 22, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
      32.2








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Key Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John J. Ehren,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  John J.
Ehren


John J.
Ehren


Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


December
12, 2008
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

AMANDA GESSNER, )

Plaintiff, ) C.A. No. 13-22 Erie

)

v. )

) District Judge Schwab

LT. NIXON, et al., ) Magistrate Judge Baxter

Defendants. )

MAGISTRATE JUDGE=S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I. RECOMMENDATION

It is respectfully recommended that Plaintiff=s motion for preliminary injunction and/or 

temporary restraining order [ECF No. 27] be denied for lack of personal jurisdiction over the 

persons that Plaintiff seeks to enjoin.

II. REPORT

Plaintiff initiated this action on January 22, 2013, by filing a pro se civil rights complaint 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983 against multiple employees of the Pennsylvania Department of 

Corrections employed at the State Correctional Institution at Cambridge Springs, Pennsylvania. 

Plaintiff is now incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Muncy, Pennsylvania (ASCIMuncy@), which is within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of Pennsylvania.

Presently pending before this Court is Plaintiff=s motion for preliminary injunction 

and/or temporary restraining order, in which Plaintiff seeks an order of this Court enjoining 

officials at SCI-Muncy from harassing and retaliating against her. [ECF No. 200]. None of the 

officials in Plaintiff=s motion are Defendants in this case. Thus, Plaintiff is asking this Court to 

Case 1:13-cv-00022-SPB Document 37 Filed 09/18/13 Page 1 of 2
2

enjoin the actions of individuals who are not parties to this proceeding and who do not live or 

work within this Court=s jurisdictional limits. This Court has no authority over the institution 

where Plaintiff is incarcerated (located within the Middle District of Pennsylvania) and no 

personal jurisdiction over the individuals working there. If Plaintiff wishes to bring a civil rights 

action against these individuals, she may do so by filing a separate action in the appropriate 

district. Accordingly, Plaintiff=s motion for preliminary injunction [ECF No. 27] should be 

denied. 

In accordance with the Federal Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1), and Fed.R.Civ.P. 

72(b)(2), the parties are allowed fourteen (14) days from the date of service to file written 

objections to this report and recommendation. Any party opposing the objections shall have 

fourteen (14) days from the date of service of objections to respond thereto. Failure to file 

objections will waive the right to appeal. Brightwell v. Lehman, 637 F. 3d 187, 193 n. 7 (3d Cir.

2011).

/s/ Susan Paradise Baxter 

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: September 18, 2013

cc: The Honorable Arthur J. Schwab

United States District Judge

Case 1:13-cv-00022-SPB Document 37 Filed 09/18/13 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Regal Cinemas, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-74634, 333-13292 and 333-13295) of
our report dated February 6, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Regal Cinemas, Inc. as of December 28, 1995 and January 2, 1997,
and for each of the three years in the period ended January 2, 1997, which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                           COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.





Knoxville, Tennessee
March 26, 1997
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

**FORM N-PX**

**ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF**

**Government & Agency Securities Portfolio, Money Market Portfolio and Tax-Exempt Portfolio**

**Each a Series of Cash Account Trust**

Investment Company Act file number  811-5970

Cash Account Trust

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

 

345 Park Avenue

New York, NY  10154

(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip code)

John Millette

Secretary

One Beacon Street

Boston, MA  02108-3106

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  617-295-1000

Date of fiscal year end:  04/30

Date of reporting period:  7/1/07-6/30/08

Form N-PX is to be used by a registered management investment company, other than a small business investment company registered on Form N-5 (§§ 239.24 and 274.5 of this chapter), to file reports with the Commission, not later than August 31 of each year, containing the registrant's proxy voting record for the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, pursuant to section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 and rule 30b1-4 thereunder (17 CFR 270.30b1-4). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-PX in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.

A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-PX, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-PX unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget ("OMB") control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. § 3507.

 
```

******************************* FORM N-Px REPORT *******************************

ICA File Number: 811-05970
Reporting Period: 07/01/2007 - 06/30/2008
Cash Account Trust

=================== GOVERNMENT & AGENCY SECURITIES PORTFOLIO ===================

NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND

============================ MONEY MARKET PORTFOLIO ============================

NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND

============================= TAX-EXEMPT PORTFOLIO =============================

NO PROXIES RECEIVED OR VOTED FOR THIS FUND

========== END NPX REPORT
```

 

----
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Nicklebys.com,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report'),  I, Scott Thornock,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.




/s/ Scott Thornock
-----------------------
Scott Thornock
Chief Executive Officer
August 11, 2003
Exhibit 21.1
                                                                    ------------

List of Subsidiaries of the Company
-----------------------------------

National  N-Viro  Tech.,  Inc.  (Ohio)
Midwest  N-Viro,  Inc.  (Illinois)
Tennessee-Carolina  N-Viro,  Inc.  (Tennessee)
N-Viro  Soil  South,  Inc.  (Florida)
N-Viro  Honolulu,  Inc.  (Hawaii)
Pan-American  N-Viro,  Inc.  (Delaware)
BioCheck  Laboratories,  Inc.  (Ohio)
American  N-Viro  Resources,  Inc.  (Ohio)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RUSSELL ALAN LATONA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 07-1 Erie

v. )

)

OFFICER MATTHEW POLLACK, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on January 3, 2007,

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 78], filed on

January 8, 2010, recommended that the motion for summary judgment filed by

Defendants Prison Health Services, Inc., Renee Wnek and Susan George [Doc. No. 66]

be granted, and that the Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a “Fourth Amended

Complaint” [Doc. No. 71] be denied as futile. The parties were allowed ten (10) days

from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified

mail and on Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the motions

and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the

following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 25 day of January, 2010; th

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment filed by

Defendants Prison Health Services, Inc., Renee Wnek and Susan George [Doc. No. 66]

is GRANTED and JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of Defendants Prison Health

Services, Inc., Renee Wnek and Susan George, and against Plaintiff, Russell Alan

Latona. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a “Fourth

Amended Complaint” [Doc. No. 71] is DENIED as futile. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 78] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

Case 1:07-cv-00001-SJM-SPB Document 79 Filed 01/25/10 Page 1 of 2
2

on January 8, 2010, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:07-cv-00001-SJM-SPB Document 79 Filed 01/25/10 Page 2 of 2
#### Elisha Jack TAYLOR, Jr., Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-700.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 27, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

December 23, 2002

Gerardo Capiel
Chief Technology Officer
Digital Impact, Inc.
214 W. 39th St., Penthouse
New York, NY 10018

RE:      RETENTION PROGRAM AMENDMENT

Dear Gerardo:

         Reference is made to the letter dated January 11, 2002 describing your
Retention Program approved by our board of directors (the "LETTER"). As we have
discussed, both you and the Company agree that it would be in the best interests
of the Company and its stockholders to amend the Letter to delay the second
payment under the Program as set forth below. All capitalized terms used herein
without definition shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Letter.

         Under the Letter, your retention payment schedule provides for payments
of $50,000 on each of the following dates, subject to your continued Service
with the Company on that date:

                                 July 1, 2002
                                 January 1, 2003
                                 July 1, 2003

         Your first retention payment of $50,000 was made by the Company on July
1, 2002. The Letter is hereby amended to provide that your second payment of
$50,000 will be made on July 1, 2003 together with the third payment, also
scheduled for that date, subject to the same conditions as set forth in the
Letter.

         Except as otherwise modified herein, all terms of the Letter shall
remain in full force and effect. This agreement may only be amended, modified or
terminated by an agreement in writing signed by you and the Company. This
agreement shall be binding upon the Company and its successors and assigns.

<PAGE>

         This agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of
California without regard to principles of conflict of laws.

Very truly yours,

DIGITAL IMPACT, INC.

By:________________________________
     David Oppenheimer
     Senior Vice President &
     Chief Financial Officer

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

___________________________________
Gerardo Capiel

                                       2
No. 00-898.

#### Haskins *v.*Prudential Insurance Company of America.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
The United States Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) invites you to participate in the U.S. DOT

Summit on Pedestrian Safety: Virtual Series. The purpose of this webinar series is to provide a virtual 

platform for dialogue and opportunity to discuss pedestrian safety issues and priorities. The webinars will 

include remarks from U.S. DOT Secretary Elaine L. Chao, FHWA’s Administrator Nicole R. Nason and 

NHTSA’s Deputy Administrator James C. Owens in addition to guest speakers from leading transportation 

safety organizations. 

Webinar 1 ‐ Taking Action on Pedestrian Safety – Part 1: Introduction and Safe System Approach

July 8, 2020 1:00‐2:30 p.m. EDT

Agenda Item Speaker 

Welcome and Introductions Cheryl Walker, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) 

Jamie Pfister, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) 

Opening Remarks Secretary Elaine L. Chao, Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation 

(U.S. DOT) 

Mala Parker, Deputy Administrator, FHWA 

James Owens, Deputy Administrator, NHTSA 

Guest Speakers Patrick McKenna, President, American Association of State Highway 

Transportation Officials (AASHTO) 

Chuck DeWeese, President, Governors Highway Safety Association 

(GHSA) 

Data Overview Rajesh Subramanian, NHTSA 

Overview of Draft U.S. DOT 

current and planned actions 

to enhance pedestrian safety 

Mike Griffith, FHWA 

Safe System Approach Jeff Paniati, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 

Mary Ann Koos, Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals 

(APBP) 

Jessica Cicchino, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) 

Facilitated Session Mike Griffith, FHWA 

Closing Remarks Nicole Nason, Administrator, FHWA