alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered November 2 6 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 01223 - CV MICHAEL MORFORD D/B/ A NEMAHA WATER SERVI CES, ET AL, Appellant s V. ESPOSITO SECURITIES, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 44th Judicial Dist rict Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 14 - 05795



### O RDER Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang

- Miers and Stoddart Before the Court are (1) the parties’ jurisdictional briefs, filed at the Court’s direction; (2) appellants’ October 3, 2014 amended emergency motion for temporary relief; (3) appellants’ November 5, 2014 second amended emergency motion for temporary relief; and (4) appellants’ November 13, 2014 request to expedite appeal

. We GRANT the request s for temporary relief and ORDER the arbitration proceedings before the American Arbitration Association STAYED pending further order of this Court. Pursuant to section 171.021(c), a stay of the trial court proceedings is automatic. See T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE A NN . § 171.021(c ) (West 201 1 )

. We DENY the request to expedite appeal as t he appeal is docketed as an accelerated appeal.We defer the jurisdictional issue to the submissions panel. As the record has been filed,

we ORDER appellants to file their brief on the merits n o later than December 1 6 , 2014.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
110 STAT. 1694 PUBLIC LAW 104–183—AUG. 6, 1996

Public Law 104–183

104th Congress

An Act

To amend the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act to

extend the Act, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act Amendments of 1996’’.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF ALLOTMENTS FOR STATES.

Section 130 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and

Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6030) is amended by striking ‘‘the

fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and inserting ‘‘the fiscal years 1995

through 1999’’.

SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS.

Section 143 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and

Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6043) is amended by striking ‘‘the

fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and inserting ‘‘the fiscal years 1995

through 1999’’.

SEC. 4. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED PROGRAMS.

Section 156(a) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and

Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6066(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘the

fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and inserting ‘‘the fiscal years 1995

through 1999’’.

42 USC 6000

note.

Developmental

Disabilities

Assistance and

Bill of Rights Act

Amendments of

1996.

Aug. 6, 1996

[S. 1757]
PUBLIC LAW 104–183—AUG. 6, 1996 110 STAT. 1695

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1757 (H.R. 3867):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–719 accompanying H.R. 3867 (Comm. on Commerce).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

July 12, considered and passed Senate.

July 30, H.R. 3867 and S. 1757 considered and passed House.

WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 32 (1996):

Aug. 6, Presidential statement.

Æ

SEC. 5. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO

PROJECTS OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE.

Section 163(a) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and

Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6083(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘the

fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and inserting ‘‘the fiscal years 1995

through 1999’’.

Approved August 6, 1996.
Aug. 13, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11842 ProFly Drones Freefly – Alta

This is a request for an amendment to Ex emption No. 11842 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015– 1148, granted to ProFly Drones. This amendment will provide for the addition of the Freefly – Alta sUAS to the inventory of approved airc raft for use during VLOS operations currently covered under Exemption 11842.

These airframes are commercially available to the gene ral public, as are a ll components used to complete them. In addition, all configurations of these components follow standard, wellestablished practices. No aspect of these aircraft is proprietary to ProFly Drones in design or

manufacture.

Freefly – Alta WEB-ALTA_Manual_RevC_03.pdf (Uploaded to Docket)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26654]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday, October 17, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    Rule enforcement review.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Catherine Dixon, 202-418-5100.
Catherine Dixon,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-26654 Filed 10-3-97; 11:40 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### Sylvester TRIBBIT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-612.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Sept. 5, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
11/19/201 0 16:0 6 FAX 2024935142 FAA ^ DMS @|001/002 

In the matter of; 

WESTERN AVIATORS, INC. 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ^' E t^^RTMENT OF 

nAMSPORWiON 

2P/0 - ^3/ / 

F A A Docket No. CP10NM003 

Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

Hearing Location: Denver, Colorado 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to 14 C-F.R. § 13.215 of the Rules of Practice in Federal Aviation 

Administration Civil Penalty Actions the Complainant, the Federal Aviation 

Administration, hereby files this motion to withdraw the complaint in this matter because 

a settlement was reached by the FAA and Western Aviators on November 18, 2010. 

WHEREFORE, the FAA respectfully requests that the complaint be dismissed 

and that ihi.s matter be tenninated. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division, AGC-30 0 

^>u<»<VvvJ/01^;tyLfrv^^ 

Susan S. Caron 

Attorney, AGC-300 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Telephone: (202) 267-7721 

Facsimile: (202) 267-5106 

Date: November 19, 2010 
11/19/2010 16:06 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS @l002/002 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this date 1 sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, certified 

return-receipt requested, a copy of the Complainant's Motion to Withdraw Complaint in 

the case of/n the Maiter of Western Aviaiiors, Inc., FAA Docket No. CP10NM003, 

addressed to: 

Mr. Richard L. Fowler, President 

Western Aviators, Inc. 

2533 Lanyon Drive 

Longmont, CO 80503 

In addition, I hereby certify that on this date 1 personally delivered the original 

and one copy of the foregoing document to: 

I'ederal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Wilbur Wright Building • Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attention; Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Name lUj>^(i> 

Dale: AU, /?, It^ln
EXHIBIT 4.1
                      SPECIMEN CERTIFICATE OF COMMON STOCK

[CERTIFICATE  NUMBER]                                       [NUMBER  OF]  SHARES

              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

                            LAPIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                    TOTAL AUTHORIZED ISSUE 105,000,000 SHARES

                                 See Reverse for
                               Certain Definitions

     100,000,000 Shares $.001 Par Value     5,000,000 Shares $.001 Par Value
                Common Stock                          Preferred Stock

                                    SPECIMEN
     This is to certify that ___________________________________ is the owner of
              ____________________________________________________

             FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF

                            LAPIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

    transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder thereof in
    person or by a duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate
  properly endorsed.  Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of
                          its duly authorized officers.



                                                                             E-1
<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54098-54099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27536]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Exclusive License Announcement: U.S. Army Research Laboratory

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(I), announcement is made 
of prospective exclusive license of U.S. Patent 5,617,031, ``Buried 
Pipe Locator Utilizing a Change in Ground Capacitance,'' for the 
purpose of manufacturing, using, and selling a product for buried pipe 
and cable finder.
    This invention is described as a buried pipe detection device based 
upon the principle of sensing of differences in the dielectric/
conductive properties of the ground in the vicinity of where the pipe 
is disclosed. The right to this United States Patent is owned by the 
United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of the Army. 
Under the authority of section 11(a)(2) of the Federal Technology 
Transfer Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-502) and section 207 of title 35 
United States Code, the Department of the Army, as represented by the 
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, intends to grant a limited term 
exclusive license of the above mentioned patent to Charles Machine 
Works, Inc., 1959 West Fir Avenue, Perry, Oklahoma, represented by, 
General Manager, Subsite Electronics, 1950 W. Fir, Perry, Oklahoma, for 
buried pipe and cable finder.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Norma Vaught, Technology Transfer 
Office, AMSRL-CS-TT, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD 20783-
1197; tel: (301) 394-2952; fax (301) 394-5815; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cfa1b9aebaa8a7bb8faebda3e1a2a6a3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81eff7e0f4e6e9f5c1e0f3edafece8ed">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(I), any 
interested party may file written objections to this prospective 
exclusive license arrangement. Written objections should

[[Page 54099]]

be directed to the above address on or before 60 days from the 
publication of this notice.
Mary V. Yonts,
Alternate Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-27536 Filed 10-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Tactical Air Defense Services, Inc.,
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Alexis Korybut, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Alexis
Korybut





Alexis
Korybut


Chief
Financial Officer


August
23, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 190 (Wednesday, October 1, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51378-51379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25680]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 43

[CC Docket No. 90-337, FCC 96-160]


Regulation of International Accounting Rates

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; announcement of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The rule amended by the Commission establishing standards for 
reporting when a carrier interconnects an international private line to 
the U.S. Public Switched Network (PSN), shall become effective October 
1, 1997. The decision, which contained new information collection 
requirements, was published in the Federal Register on November 21, 
1996.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The amendment to 47 CFR Sec. 43.51 published at 61 FR 
59198 (November 21, 1996) is effective October 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan O'Connell, Attorney-Advisor, 
Policy and Facilities Branch, Telecommunications Division, 
International Bureau, (202) 418-1470.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 9, 1996, the Commission adopted a 
Third Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration (``Order'') (FCC 
96-160) establishing standards for reporting when a carrier 
interconnects an international private line to the U.S. Public Switched 
Network (PSN), a summary of which was published in the Federal 
Register. See 61 FR 59198, November 21, 1996. We stated that the ``rule 
was effective December 23, 1996, except Sec. 43.51(d), which contains 
new information collections which will not become effective until 
approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).'' We also stated 
that ``the Commission will publish a document in the Federal Register 
at a later date establishing the effective date.'' This statement 
requires further action by the Commission to establish the effective 
date, notwithstanding the preceding statement in the summary that the 
rule change would become effective upon OMB approval. In order to 
resolve this matter in a manner that most appropriately provides 
interested parties with proper notice, the rule changes adopted in the 
Order shall become effective October 1, 1997. The information 
collection contained in Sec. 43.51(d) was approved by OMB on January 6, 
1997. See OMB No. 3060-0751.

[[Page 51379]]

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 43

    Communications common carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

Federal Communications Commission.
Shirley S. Suggs,
Chief, Publications Branch.
[FR Doc. 97-25680 Filed 9-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

** Honorable Robin J. Cauthron, District Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Oklahoma, sitting by designation.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAR 14 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

DAVID H. JOHNS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

STEPHEN W. KAISER, Warden;

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF OKLAHOMA,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 96-7031

(D.C. No. CV-90-23-S)

(E.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BRORBY and KELLY, Circuit Judges, and CAUTHRON,** District Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Petitioner appeals the district court’s denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6)

motion seeking relief from that court’s 1990 judgment denying him federal habeas

relief, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, from his Oklahoma convictions for felony murder and

conspiracy to commit armed robbery. This court dismissed the appeal from the

1990 denial of habeas relief because petitioner failed to make a substantial

showing of the denial of a federal right. Petitioner may not use Rule 60(b) to

circumvent rules against abuse of the writ. Petitioner fails to allege or prove any

circumstances that would justify the filing of a successive writ or that would

require reconsideration of his original grounds for relief. Because we review the

district court’s denial of Rule 60(b)(6) relief for an abuse of discretion, Metz v.

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 39 F.3d 1482, 1491 (10th Cir. 1994),

we affirm. 

Petitioner contends that intervening changes in the law, retroactively

applicable to his case, require reconsideration of his § 2254 claims. Aside from

the fact that between his first and second petitions, there have been no intervening

changes in the law, even if there have been, ordinarily new constitutional rules of

criminal procedure will not be applied on collateral review. See generally Teague

v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 305-10 (1989). 

Petitioner is not entitled to Rule 60(b)(6) relief on his claims both because

relief based upon post-judgment changes in the law is ordinarily not available
-3-

under Rule 60(b)(6), see Johnston v. Cigna Corp., 14 F.3d 486, 497 (10th Cir.

1993), and because petitioner’s purported new authority is not relevant. 

The judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Oklahoma is, therefore, AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
#### WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC., etc., Petitioner, v. Mary CAPONE, etc., Respondent.

No. 39628.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 2, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 233 So.2d 175.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00119

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A CHILD

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC

- 14

- 81

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial

court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that Appellees recover the costs of appeal from Appellants.

SIGNED October 28, 201 5.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
1 Ru le 10 (C ourt o f Ap pea ls). Affi rmance W it hout Opi nion . -- (a) T he C ourt, w ith the concurren ce of

all jud ge s p ar ticip atin g in the case, may affi rm the acti on of t he tr ial court by or der wi thout renderi ng a for mal opini on when an opinion would have no preced ential val ue and on e or m ore of t he fol lowi ng cir cumstances ex ist a nd are dis po sitiv e o f th e a pp ea l: (1) T he C ourt c onc urs in the fa cts a s fou nd o r as f oun d by ne ces sar y imp lication b y the trial co urt. (2 ) T he re is m ate ria l ev ide nc e to su pp or t the ve rd ict o f th e ju ry. (3) No r eversi ble er ror of law app ears. 

# FILED

Ap ril 12, 1996 Cecil W. Crowson Ap pellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COU RT OF A PPEA LS OF TENN ESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT NA SHVILLE

METROPOLIT

AN GOVERNMEN T OF ) NASHVILLE-DA

VIDSON COUNTY , ) Davidso n Circuit No. 94C-2930 ) Plaintiff/Appellee, ) Ap peal No. 01A 01-9511-CV-004 97 ) vs. ) ) DIANNA SADLER, ) ) Defendant/Appellant. )

RULE 10 ORD ER A ND OPINION

This appears to be a pr oper matter for co nsideration pur suant to Court of Appeals Rule 10(a). 1

In thi s ca se, appellant, D ianna Sadler, ap peals from the tri al court’s judgment finding that her dogs are “vici ous” wi thin the meaning of Metropolit an Code § 8.08.010. The trial
court ordered appell ant to remove the dogs from her premises and c onfine them upon her father’s property in Cheatham County. The a ppellant filed a Notice of Appeal, but did not file a Transcript of the Procee dings within 90 da ys thereafter, as r equired by Rule 24(b) of the Tennessee Rules

of Appellate Proc edure.

Appellant’s sole issue on appeal is whethe r the evi dence preponderates against the trial court’s findi ng of fact that the dog s were “ vicious. ” Howev

er, the evi dence and testimony

considered by

the trial j udge in reac hing this conclusion ar e abs ent fr om the record. It is w ell-establi shed that in the absence of a transc ript of the evidence, this court
must conclusiv ely presu me that there was sufficient evidence to support th e trial court’s judgment and must, therefore, affirm. Reago r v. Dyer C ounty , 651 S.W.2d 700, 701 (Tenn. 1983); Leek v. Powell , 884 S.W.2d 121 (Tenn. App. 1994); Coakley v. Daniels , 840 S.W.2d2

367, 370 (Tenn. Ap p. 1992).

According ly, it i s ORDERED that the trial court’s j udgment is affirmed in accordance with Court of Appeals Rule 10(a). Costs in thi s cause are tax ed to ap pell ant, fo r which

execu tion may is sue i f ne cess ary.

HIGHERS, J.

FARMER, J.

LILLARD, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001076700
<NAME>                        VIRILITEC INDUSTRIES, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         6,946
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,640
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,586
<PP&E>                                         3,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,800)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 (25,886)
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,201
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       471
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,214
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   25,886
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (49,888)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (49,888)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (49,888)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (49,888)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>