alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



WRITTEN STATEMENT
 PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





The undersigned, Richard K. Matros, the Chief Executive Officer, of Sun Healthcare Group, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, hereby certifies that:



(i)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Richard K. Matros
|------------------- | ---------------------
|                    | Richard K. Matros
#### CLINCHFIELD RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. C. David DUKE, Appellee.

No. N-512.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 1, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 22, 2019

No. 04-17-00674-CV

Christopher Todd RUST,

Appellant

v.

Aslynn Tanis RUST,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-470

Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice 

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice 

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice 

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice 

Irene Rios, Justice 

Beth Watkins, Justice 

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice 

The panel has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is 

DENIED. 

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of February, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Opinion issued March 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00261-CV

———————————

MARY RUSSELL AND RANDY RUSSELL, Appellants

V.

LAURA CASARES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 269th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-22358

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. No opinion has 

issued. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. 
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Sharp, and Huddle.
Scaled RRF - SJV 4k DomainBakersfield - PlanzNH4 NO3 SO4 OC EC OTRQ1 0.78 0.75 0.97 0.74 0.88 0.98Q2 0.70 0.62 0.99 0.82 0.89 0.99Q3 0.67 0.60 0.98 0.84 0.89 0.99Q4 0.79 0.77 0.95 0.73 0.88 0.99Annual2011-2013 STN with SandwichNH4 NO3 SO4 OCMmb EC Crustal Water BlankFilter Mass 2011 2012 20132011-2013Q1 1.97 5.49 1.14 6.06 0.94 1.53 1.08 0.50 18.71 18.4 15.2 21.5 18.37Q2 0.24 0.00 1.38 3.84 0.43 1.68 0.49 0.50 8.57 8.8 10.9 13.4 11.05Q3 0.30 0.00 1.58 3.41 0.57 3.33 0.57 0.50 10.26 10.4 13.1 14.8 12.77Q4 1.52 4.54 1.20 6.41 1.21 2.12 0.91 0.50 18.42 20.3 19.6 37.0 25.64Annual 1.01 2.51 1.33 4.93 0.79 2.16 0.76 0.50 13.99 14.48 14.70 21.69 16.962018-2020 Controlled PM2.5NH4 NO3 SO4 OCMmb EC Crustal Water BlankFilter Mass 2018 2019 20202018-2020Q1 1.53 4.10 1.11 4.50 0.83 1.50 0.83 0.50 14.90 14.66 12.13 17.12 14.64Q2 0.17 0.00 1.36 3.14 0.39 1.66 0.49 0.50 7.70 7.91 9.78 12.05 9.91Q3 0.20 0.00 1.55 2.87 0.51 3.29 0.56 0.50 9.48 9.61 12.10 13.67 11.79Q4 1.21 3.51 1.14 4.69 1.06 2.09 0.72 0.50 14.93 16.44 15.87 29.89 20.73Annual 0.78 1.90 1.29 3.80 0.70 2.14 0.65 0.50 11.75 12.15 12.47 18.18 14.27Design ValueFuture Design Value
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2584]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Docket No. C-3703]


AAF-McQuay, Inc.; Prohibited Trade Practices, and Affirmative 
Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order prohibits, among other things, a 
Kentucky-based manufacturer of residential air filters from making any 
representation regarding the performance, health or other benefits, or 
efficacy of air cleaning products, unless the respondent possesses 
competent and reliable scientific evidence to substantiate such 
representations.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued January 6, 1997.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Milgrom, Federal Trade Commission, Cleveland Regional Office, 
668 Euclid Avenue, Suite 520-A, Cleveland, OH 44114-3006. (216) 522-
4210.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Monday, October 28, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 61 FR 55641, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of AAF-McQuay, Inc., for the 
purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties were given 
sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or objections 
regarding the proposed form of the order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to cease and 
desist, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45)
Benjamin I. Berman,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2584 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
Exhibit 31.2
                                                                     -----------


                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, James K. McHugh, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of N-Viro International
Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for internal purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Dated:  March  31,  2008


/s/  James  K.  McHugh
----------------------
James  K.  McHugh
Chief  Financial  Officer
#### CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a municipal corporation, Appellant, v. Irving CYPEN, et al., Appellee.

No. 68-1037.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 9, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT
23.1








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and amendments thereto:





Form S-8
No. 333-115851


Form S-3
No. 333-113710


Form S-8
No. 333-130916


Form S-3
No. 333-135549


Form S-8
No. 333-135525


Form S-3
No. 333-150561


Form S-4
No. 333-144497


Form S-3
No. 333-115288





of Sun
Healthcare Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 5, 2008 (except for Notes 1
and 8(b) as to which the date is March 3, 2009), with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sun Healthcare Group, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2008.








/s/ Ernst
& Young LLP








Dallas,
Texas


March 3,
2009
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                   SELECTICA, INC. 1999 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

                          NOTICE OF STOCK OPTION GRANT

            You have been granted the following option to purchase Common Stock
of Selectica, Inc. (the "Company"):

            Name of Optionee:                  SANJAY MITTAL

            Total Number of Shares Granted:    500,000

            Type of Option:                    Nonstatutory Stock Option

            Exercise Price Per Share:          $2.56

            Date of Grant:                     DECEMBER 11, 2002

            Vesting Commencement Date:         DECEMBER 11, 2002

            Vesting Schedule:                  This option becomes exercisable
                                               with respect to 1/36 of the
                                               shares subject to this option
                                               when you complete each month of
                                               continuous service following the
                                               Vesting Commencement Date. In
                                               the event of Involuntary Term-
                                               ination (as defined in the Plan)
                                               within 12 months following a
                                               Change in Control (as defined
                                               in the Plan), this option
                                               becomes vested and exercisable
                                               in full.



            Expiration Date:                   December 10, 2012

By your signature and the signature of the Company's representative below, you
and the Company agree that this option is granted under and governed by the
terms and conditions of the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") and the
Stock Option Agreement, both of which are attached to and made a part of this
document. By your signature below, you agree that this option represents the
only option that you are eligible to receive pursuant to the employment
agreement between you and the Company dated January 1, 2003, and that any
previous documentation to evidence this option that may have been provided to
you is hereby superseded in its entirety.

OPTIONEE:                               SELECTICA, INC.

/s/ SANJAY MITTAL                       By: /s/ STEPHEN BENNION
----------------------------               -------------------------------------
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Motorvehicle use map. Inyo National Forest. June Lake & Mammoth, California**
 
2010:Front | Back
2013:Front | Back
2015:Front | Back
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:IN 8/4/JUNE/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:000911625
 
June 26, 2018
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No

. 201 700300

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v. 

### ZACKERY E. RIBEIRO Seaman ( E

- 3 ) , U

. S

. Navy Appellant

_________________________ Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Commander William Weiland, JAGC, USN

. Convening Authority: C ommand er, Navy Region Mid

- Atlantic, Norfolk, VA

. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Commander I.C. Lemoyne
, JAGC, USN

. For App ellant : Lieutenant R. Andrew Austria, JAGC, USN

.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ Decided 12 July 2018

_________________________ Before H UTCHISON , F ULTON , and S AYEGH , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ After ca reful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). The supplemental court

- martial order wil l reflect that the appellant is entitled to 134 days of pretrial confinement credit.
For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-18-00075-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.K., S.M., JR., AND A.M., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 336th District Court

Fannin County, Texas

Trial Court No. FA-17-43335

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The appellant has filed a motion with this Court seeking to voluntarily dismiss this appeal. 

Pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the motion is granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: November 6, 2018

Date Decided: November 7, 2018
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EDWARD J. NICHOLAS, )

Plaintiff, )

) C.A. No. 06-212 Erie

v. )

) District Judge McLaughlin

AMERICAN DETECTIVE AGENCY, ) Magistrate Judge Baxter

et al., )

Defendants. )

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I. RECOMMENDATION

It is respectfully recommended that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without prejudice

to Plaintiff’s right to pay the filing fee of $350.00 before October 23, 2006. 

II. REPORT

Plaintiff, an inmate incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Albion, presented

this civil rights complaint, along with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Section 804(g) of Pub.L. No. 104-134, enacted April 26, 1996, amended 28 U.S.C. §

1915 to provide:

[i]n no events shall a prisoner bring a civil action ... under this section if the

prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any

facility, brought an action or appeal in the court of the United States that was

dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger

of serious physical injury.

28 U.S.C. §1915(g).

Plaintiff has been a prolific advocate in this federal court. At least three of Plaintiff’s

prior lawsuits have been dismissed as legally frivolous: Civil Actions Numbers 06-98 Erie, 06-

112 Erie, and 06-201 Erie, all filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of

Case 1:06-cv-00212-SJM-SPB Document 3 Filed 10/03/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Pennsylvania. 

An indigent inmate may overcome the “Three Strikes Rule” if he can show that he is

under “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307

(3d Cir. 2001) (interpreting imminent danger). Plaintiff has not alleged such imminent danger.

Accordingly, Plaintiff must pay the full filing fee before October 23, 2006, or risk

dismissal of this action.

III. CONCLUSION

Because of these prior dismissals, and because Plaintiff has not alleged that he is in

imminent danger of serious physical injury, it is recommended that the complaint be dismissed

without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to pay the full filing fee of $350.00 to the Clerk of Courts

before October 23, 2006. 

In accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Local

Rule 72.1.4B, the parties are allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file written

objections to this report. Any party opposing the objections shall have seven (7) days from the

date of service of objections to respond thereto. Failure to timely file objections may constitute

a waiver of any appellate rights.

S/ Susan Paradise Baxter

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: October 3, 2006

Case 1:06-cv-00212-SJM-SPB Document 3 Filed 10/03/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 10.8

                               DELTA MUTUAL, INC.
                       1730 Rhode Island Avenue, Suite 812
                             Washington, D.C. 20036
                                  203-820-4831

February 3, 2003

Mr. Peter Russo
73 Watercrest Drive
Doylestown, Pennsylvania 18901

Dear Mr. Martin:

This shall serve as the agreement by and between Delta Mutual, Inc., a Delaware
Corporation (the "Company") and you, in your capacity as an agent to the
Company(the "Agent") to provide Agent with full compensation for your past
services rendered to the Company.

The Company acknowledges that the Agent has performed corporate and business
planning services, for and on behalf of the Company, which services have
included (1)the preparation of presentations for submittal to the United States
Trade Development Agency in connection with the Company's plan to develop new
business operations in the energy and environmental sectors in the former
republics of the USSR; (2) established communications with responsible members
overseeing the environmental section of the World Bank in connection with
proposed projects in the Republic of the Ukraine, including two business trips
to Washington, D.C., and(3) devoted no less that 200 hours to these endeavors,
which included approximately 10 business trips to New Jersey, Texas and New York
in connection with the establishment of business operations in the energy and
environmental sectors. All of these past services have resulted in an
outstanding Company debt due Agent in the approximate amount of $20,000.
Pursuant to our discussions, Agent has agreed to accept 40,000 restricted shares
of the Company's common shares (the "Shares") In full payment of the Company's
debt. In addition and as further consideration for Agent's agreement to accept
the Shares as payment, the Company shall utilize its best efforts to register
the Shares for sale to the public by including them in a Form S-8 registration
statement that the Company shall file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933 Act"). The
Company shall issue the Shares in your individual name and identity you as the
selling shareholder in the registration statement. Upon the filing of this Form
S-8, we shall notify you of the date of its effectiveness and provide you with
the necessary copies of the prospectus to be used in any proposed sale of the
Shares.

Please indicate your agreement to the terms set forth in this correspondence by
signing your name where indicated below, returning a signed copy to me at your
convenience.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Kenneth Martin
--------------------------
DELTA MUTUAL, INC.
Kenneth Martin, President


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

/s/ Peter Russo
---------------------------
Peter Russo, Agent
#### FIRST NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF DUNEDIN, Appellant, v. H. R. OVERTON a/k/a Harley R. Overton, Appellee.

No. 69-660.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 19, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
Opinion issued February 24, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00943-CR

———————————

VAUGHN MONROE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1445412

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Vaughn Monroe, was previously convicted of the offense of 

aggravated sexual assault of a child, which carries with it a requirement to register 
2

with the Texas sex offender registration program.1 Monroe was charged with 

failure to comply with the applicable sex offender registration requirements. The 

trial court found Monroe guilty, and in accordance with Monroe’s plea bargain 

agreement with the State, sentenced Monroe to confinement for six years. Monroe

filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were 

raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial 

court’s permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 

2006); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification

showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the 

record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

The trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal is included in the 

record. The trial court’s certification correctly states that that Monroe has no right 

of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports the trial court’s 

certification. Because Monroe has no right of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for 

want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

 

1

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021(West 2011); TEX. CODE CRIM. P. §62.001 

(West 2014).
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

34 36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 05/31 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
#### Jose ANDRACA, Appellant, v. The CITY OF MIAMI, Appellee.

No. 69-750.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 16, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### PLAQUEMINES MATERIALS INC. v. Larry K. BESS.

No. 62085.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1978.

In re: Larry K. Bess applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Plaque-mines.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.