alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2878 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2878

   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exclude certain 
         activities from hours worked, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2023

  Mr. Budd (for himself, Mr. Braun, and Mr. Marshall) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exclude certain 
         activities from hours worked, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flexibility for Workers Education 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF ATTENDANCE OR PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN ACTIVITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 
1938 (29 U.S.C. 203(o)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(o) Hours Worked.--In determining for the purposes of sections 6 
and 7 the hours for which an employee is employed, there shall be 
excluded--
            ``(1) any time spent in changing clothes or washing at the 
        beginning or end of each workday which was excluded from 
        measured working time during the week involved by the express 
        terms of or by custom or practice under a bona fide collective-
        bargaining agreement applicable to the particular employee; and
            ``(2) any time spent attending or participating in 
        lectures, education or training programs, and similar 
        activities, regardless of whether the activity is offered or 
        facilitated by the employer, provided that--
                    ``(A) the attendance or participation occurs 
                outside of the regular working hours of the employee;
                    ``(B) the attendance or participation is voluntary 
                and the continuation of employment and the working 
                conditions related to such employment is not adversely 
                affected by non-attendance or non-participation; and
                    ``(C) the employee does not perform any productive 
                work for the employer during the attendance or 
                participation.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to hours worked on or after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
110 STAT. 1412 PUBLIC LAW 104–160—JULY 9, 1996

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3364:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–611 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

June 10, considered and passed House.

June 27, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–160

104th Congress

An Act

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 235

North Washington Avenue in Scranton, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘William J. Nealon

Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 235 North Washington Avenue in Scranton, Pennsylvania, shall

be known and designated as the ‘‘William J. Nealon Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building and

United States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

to be a reference to the ‘‘William J. Nealon Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

Approved July 9, 1996.

July 9, 1996

[H.R. 3364]
Exhibit 23

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 of Matrix Bancorp, Inc. listed below of our report dated February 23,
2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Matrix Bancorp,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2000 expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about March 15, 2001:

1.   Registration Statement Number 333-51516, filed with the Securities and
     Exchange Commission on December 8, 2000 pertaining to the Executive
     Deferred Compensation Plan of Matrix Bancorp, Inc.;

2.   Registration Statement Number 333-40482, filed with the Securities and
     Exchange Commission on June 29, 2000 pertaining to the 1996 Amended and
     Restated Employee Stock Option Plan and the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase
     Plan of Matrix Bancorp, Inc.; and

3.   Registration Statement Number 333-36671, filed with the Securities and
     Exchange Commission on September 29, 1997 pertaining to the 1996 Amended
     and Restated Employee Stock Option Plan and the 1996 Employee Stock
     Purchase Plan of Matrix Bancorp, Inc.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
March 14, 2001
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Jim VAUGHN, Relator, v. Russell H. McINTOSH, Judge of Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-289.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 8, 1970.

Prohibition denied.
Exhibit 32.3

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
Scott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
company for the dates and periods covered by the report.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company (or equivalent) with the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used by any person
or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.


                                        /s/ Mark E. Scott
                                        -----------------
                                        Mark E. Scott
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        April 14, 2004
Exhibit
        23.2
 
 
 
 
  **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
  We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
        333-128512, 333-50130, 33-71108, and 333-2396 on Form S-8 of our report on
        the
        financial statements of Key Technology, Inc. dated December 16, 2004, appearing
        in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Key Technology, Inc. for the year ended
        September 30, 2005.
  /s/ *DELOITTE
        & TOUCHE LLP*
  Portland,
        Oregon
 December
        27, 2005
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We consent
to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-149313 of our report dated April 10, 2008, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of YPF SOCIEDAD ANONIMA (“YPF”) (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the
accounting principles generally accepted in Argentina vary in certain
significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, that the information relating to the nature and effect of
such differences is presented in Notes 13, 14, and 15 to the consolidated
financial statements of YPF), and of our report dated April 10, 2008, relating
to the effectiveness of YPF’s internal control
over financial reporting, both reports appearing in the Annual Report on Form
20-F/A (Amendment No. 2) of YPF for the year ended December 31,
2007.
 
 
 Buenos
Aires, Argentina
 October
17, 2008
 
 
 
 Deloitte
& Co. S.R.L.
 
 
 
 /s/
Ricardo C. Ruiz
 Ricardo C.
Ruiz
 Partner
EXHIBIT 21.1

                              TARRANT APPAREL GROUP

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


                                                              JURISDICTION OF
NAME                                                           ORGANIZATION
----                                                           ------------

Private Brands, Inc.......................................      California

Fashion Resource (TCL), Inc...............................      California

Tag Mex, Inc..............................................      California

NO! Jeans, Inc............................................      California

Rocky Apparel, LLC........................................      Delaware

Tag Mex, LLC..............................................      California

United Apparel Ventures, LLC..............................      California

PBG7, LLC.................................................      California

PBCR, Inc.................................................      California

Jane Doe International, LLC...............................      Delaware

Tarrant Company Limited...................................      Hong Kong

Marble Limited............................................      Hong Kong

Trade Link Holdings Limited...............................      Hong Kong

Jane Doe Hong Kong Ltd....................................      Hong Kong

Tarrant Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.........................      Mexico

TAG Fin, S.A. de C.V......................................      Mexico

Tarrant Luxembourg, Sarl..................................      Luxembourg
#### Patricia Marcel SHUMATE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Gerri Huff NICKELS, Appellant, v. STATE OF Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 51120, 51119.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 31, 1978.

Robert W. Pope of the Law Offices of Robert W. Pope, St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mary Jo M. Gallay, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The constitutional issue having been resolved in our recent opinion in *State v. Bales,*343 So.2d 9 (1977), it appears that the only substantial issue involved is within the jurisdiction of the Circuit Court for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, therefore, pursuant to the provisions of Florida Appellate Rules, it is ordered that this cause be transferred to said Circuit Court for the Twelfth Circuit, for consideration and determination after five (5) days from this date unless, in the meantime, attorneys of record for the parties, or any of them, shall bring to the attention of the court that the cause is one which should be heard and determined by this court. Unless such cause is shown by writing filed in this court within the time stated, the Clerk shall complete the transfer in accord with the above directive without further order.

OVERTON, C. J. and BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

ADKINS, J., dissents.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26891]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Task Force on Defense Reform

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Task Force on 
Defense Reform (the Task Force). The meeting will be open to the 
public. One purpose of the meeting is to meet with the labor unions 
representing federal employees in DoD. In addition, time will be set 
aside for anyone who wishes to address the Task Force with ideas about 
streamlining, restructuring, and reengineering OSD and other components 
or elements of the Department of Defense.
    The Task Force on Defense Reform was established to make 
recommendations to the Secretary of Defense and Deputy Secretary of 
Defense on alternatives for organizational reforms, reductions in 
management overhead, and streamlined business practices in the 
Department of Defense, with emphasis on the Office of the Secretary of 
Defense, the Defense Agencies and the DoD Field Activities, and the 
Military Departments.

DATES: Tuesday, October 21, 1997, at 3:30 P.M.

ADDRESSES: Room 3E869, the Pentagon, Washington, DC. Seating is 
limited. Must call Ms. Lynn Cline at the number listed in FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION section below to arrange for access to Pentagon.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Ms. Lynn Cline, Task Force on 
Defense Reform, Room 3C965, Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301. Telephone: 
(703) 614-7522. Interested parties should call Ms. Cline before 1:00 
p.m., Tuesday, October 21, 1997.

    Dated: October 6, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-26891 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3196 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide a State option 

to extend Medicaid coverage for foster care children while receiving 

treatment from a qualified residential treatment program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2023 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 

a State option to extend Medicaid coverage for foster 

care children while receiving treatment from a qualified 

residential treatment program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Medicaid 

5 Continuity for Children in Foster Care Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3196 IS

1 SEC. 2. STATE OPTION TO EXTEND MEDICAID COVERAGE 

2 FOR FOSTER CARE CHILDREN WHILE RE3 CEIVING TREATMENT FROM A QUALIFIED 

4 RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT PROGRAM. 

5 Section 1902(e) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1396a(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(17) EXTENDING COVERAGE FOR FOSTER

8 CARE CHILDREN WHILE RECEIVING TREATMENT

9 FROM A QUALIFIED RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT PRO10 GRAM.— 

11 ‘‘(A) STATE OPTION.—At the option of the 

12 State, the State plan (or a waiver of such State 

13 plan) may provide that a child in foster care 

14 under the responsibility of a State who is eligi15 ble for medical assistance under such plan (or 

16 waiver) (including during a period of retroactive 

17 eligibility under subsection (a)(34)), shall re18 main eligible under such plan (or waiver) for 

19 medical assistance during any period in which 

20 the child— 

21 ‘‘(i) receives treatment provided by 

22 any qualified residential treatment pro23 gram (as defined in section 472(k)(4)) in 

24 which the child has been placed in accord25 ance with the requirements of sections 

26 472(k)(3) and 475A(c); and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3196 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) continues to be in foster care 

2 under the responsibility of a State. 

3 ‘‘(B) FEDERAL FINANCIAL PARTICIPA4 TION.—A State that has elected the option 

5 under subparagraph (A) shall receive payment 

6 under section 1903(a) for amounts expended to 

7 provide medical assistance to a child described 

8 in such subparagraph, including amounts ex9 pended for medical assistance for items or serv10 ices that are provided to any such child outside 

11 of the facility (or distinct part thereof) in which 

12 a qualified residential treatment program (as so 

13 defined) is located.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### George Bogensky, Plaintiff, *v.*Harry Rosenberg, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Trial Term, Suffolk County,

September 22, 1952.

*PLarry Rosenberg,*defendant in person.

*Diamond $ Robinson*for plaintiff.

Ritchie, J.

Motion by defendant to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff sustained damages by reason of the misconduct of the defendant, in his office as a notary public, in certifying to the acknowledgment of a deed containing a covenant against encumbrances when, it is alleged in the complaint, such premises were encumbered to the knowledge of the defendant.

The action is brought under the provisions of section 135 of the Executive Law which specifically sets forth the powers and duties of notaries public which are, among other things, “ to receive and certify acknowledgments or proof of deeds ”. The section thereafter provides “ For any misconduct by a notary public in the performance of any of his powers such notary public shall be liable to the parties injured for all damages sustained by them.”

The complaint fails to set forth any misconduct by the defendant in the performance of *Ms powers as a notary public*in certifying to the acknowledgment of the deed described in the complaint. Accordingly, the motion is granted.
#### AEROSONIC CORPORATION and Diversified Components Division of B & F of Clearwater, Inc., Appellant, v. DIVERSIFIED CONSTRUCTION COMPONENTS, INC., Appellee.

No. 71-155.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 13, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
#### The UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Mike POPOLA, Appellant.

No. 264.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Feb. 15, 1937.

David Goldstein and George A. Saden, both of Bridgeport, Conn., for appellant.

Robert P. Butler, U. S. Atty., of Hartford, Conn., and Arthur T. Gorman, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New. Haven, Conn.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report of Trestle Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the
undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officer’s knowledge:







(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Date:  January
20,
2009                                                                  /s/ ERIC
STOPPENHAGEN


Eric Stoppenhagen


Interim President and Corporate
Secretary
March 29, 2021 

Access to Programs, Services, Information, and Technology 

Policy Statement 

The U.S. Department of Transportation will take appropriate steps to ensure equal access in 

compliance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, which prohibits 

disability discrimination in any program or activity that receives Federal funds or is conducted 

by an executive agency. The Department will ensure that people with disabilities will enjoy 

equal opportunity and benefit from all its programs, services, activities, and facilities. 

Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requires all electronic and information technology 

purchased, developed, maintained, or used by the Department to meet accessibility standards for 

information that is shared with the American public and employees. 

Simply put, to achieve organizational excellence, the Department must maintain an accessible 

work environment. This is crucial to ensuring that all individuals with disabilities have equal 

employment opportunities. Supervisors and managers are responsible for effective leadership 

that demonstrates our commitment and accomplishes the goal of equal access. The Chief 

Information Officer, the Assistant Secretary for Administration, and the Director of our 

Departmental Office of Civil Rights are available to provide policy guidance and technical 

assistance on how to create and maintain an accessible work environment. 

Pete Buttigieg
EXHIBIT
31.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Richard K. Matros, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Sun Healthcare Group,
Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.











Date:
      January 8, 2009
            /s/
      Richard K. MatrosRichard
      K. Matros
              Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)