<PAGE>


                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 10-K

               (x) Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                  For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2000
                                       or
                  ( ) Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13
                 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                       Commission file number: 0-22448

                      THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND (SM) VI L.P.
             ------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                  DELAWARE                              13-3714541
       -------------------------------           -----------------------
       (State or other jurisdiction of               (I.R.S. Employer
       incorporation or organization)               Identification No.)

                   C/O MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT PARTNERS INC.
                           PRINCETON CORPORATE CAMPUS
                       800 SCUDDERS MILL ROAD - SECTION 2G
                          PLAINSBORO, NEW JERSEY 08536
                          ----------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (609) 282-6996

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: None

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
Limited Partnership Units

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
                                                        Yes  X          No
                                                           -----           -----

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained,
to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.                              [X]

Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates of the registrant: the registrant is a limited partnership: as of
February 1, 2001, limited partnership units with an aggregate value of
$12,030,507 were outstanding and held by non-affiliates.

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The registrant's "2000 Annual Report and Independent Auditors' Report," the
annual report to security holders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000,
is incorporated by reference into Part II, Item 8 and Part IV hereof and filed
as an Exhibit herewith.

- Guarantee comments to annual report - open

<PAGE>




                      THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND (SM) VI L.P.

                       ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2000 ON FORM 10-K

                              Table of Contents
                              -----------------


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       PART I                                                  PAGE
                                                       ------                                                  ----
<S>           <C>                                                                                              <C>
Item 1.       Business......................................................................................     1

Item 2.       Properties....................................................................................     6

Item 3.       Legal Proceedings.............................................................................     6

Item 4.       Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders...........................................     6


                                                      PART II
                                                      -------

Item 5.       Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.........................     6

Item 6.       Selected Financial Data.......................................................................     7

Item 7.       Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.........     9

Item 7A.      Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk....................................    15

Item 8.       Financial Statements and Supplementary Data...................................................    16

Item 9.       Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure..........    16


                                                     PART III
                                                     --------

Item 10.      Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant............................................    16

Item 11.      Executive Compensation........................................................................    18

Item 12.      Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management................................    18

Item 13.      Certain Relationships and Related Transactions................................................    18


                                                     PART IV
                                                     -------

Item 14.      Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K...............................    20

</TABLE>


<PAGE>



                                     PART I
ITEM 1:  BUSINESS

         (a)      General Development of Business:
                  -------------------------------

                  The SECTOR Strategy Fund (SM) VI L.P. (the "Partnership") was
organized under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act on April
23, 1993 and began trading operations on September 10, 1993. The Partnership
made a single offering of its units of limited partnership interest ("Units").
Units may be redeemed as of the end of each calendar month. The Partnership
engages (currently, through an investment in a limited liability company, see
below) in the speculative trading of a portfolio of futures, options on futures,
forwards and options on forward contracts and related options in the currencies,
interest rates, stock index, metals, agricultural and energy sectors of the
world futures markets. The Partnership's objective is achieving, through
speculative trading, substantial capital appreciation, over time, while also
assuring investors of at least a predetermined minimum Net Asset Value per Unit
as of the Principal Assurance Date.

                  Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc. ("MLIP") is the
general partner of the Partnership and selects and allocates the
Partnership's assets (through the Partnership's investment in ML
Multi-Manager Portfolio LLC ("MM LLC") among professional advisors
("Advisors"), each unaffiliated with MLIP and each of which trades
independently of the others. The Partnership and MM LLC are referred to
throughout this document, either individually and/or collectively, as the
"Partnership". MLIP also determines what percentage of the Partnership's
assets to allocate to trading and what percentage to hold in reserve. MLIP is
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch Group, Inc., which, in turn, is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. ("Merrill Lynch").
Merrill Lynch Futures Inc. ("MLF") is the Partnership's commodity broker. MLF
is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch.

                  MLIP became a member of Merrill Lynch Investment Managers
("MLIM") - Alternative Investments Group during October 2000.  MLIM's
Alternative Investments Group creates and manages a variety of alternative
investment products, including managed futures funds, hedge funds, funds of
funds, exchange funds and private equity funds.  MLIP is currently intending
to convert to a Delaware limited liability company to be named MLIM
Alternative Strategies LLC.  This conversion is expected to occur during 2001.

                  Prior to October 1, 1996, the Partnership placed assets
with the Advisors by opening individual managed accounts with them. For the
period from October 1, 1996 to May 31, 1998, the Partnership placed assets
with certain of the Advisors through investing in private funds ("Trading
LLCs") sponsored by MLIP, through which the trading accounts of different
MLIP-sponsored funds managed by the same Advisor pursuant to the same
strategy were consolidated. The only members of the Trading LLCs were
commodity pools sponsored by MLIP. Placing assets with an Advisor through
investing in a Trading LLC rather than a managed account had no economic
effect on the Partnership, except to the extent that the Partnership
benefited from the Advisor not having to allocate trades among a number of
different accounts (rather than acquiring a single position for the Trading
LLC as a whole). As of June 1, 1998, MLIP consolidated the trading accounts
of nine of its multi-advisor funds (the "Multi-Advisor Funds"), including the
Partnership. The consolidation was achieved by having these Multi-Advisor
Funds invest in a single Delaware limited liability company, MM LLC, which
opened a single account with each Advisor selected. MM LLC is managed by
MLIP, has no investors other than the Multi-Advisor Funds and serves solely
as the vehicle through which the assets of such Multi-Advisor Funds are
combined in order to be managed through single rather than multiple accounts.
As of September 2000, two additional Multi-Advisor Funds were added to MM
LLC. The placement of assets into MM LLC did not change the operations or fee
structure of the Partnership. The administrative authority over the
Partnership, as well as MM LLC, remains with MLIP.

                                      -1-
<PAGE>

                  As of December 31, 2000, the Partnership's capitalization
was $12,483,383, and the Net Asset Value of a Unit originally $100 as of
September 10, 1993 had risen to $128.22.

                  Merrill Lynch guaranteed that the Net Asset Value per Unit
would equal at least $98.27 as of December 31, 2000 (the "Principal Assurance
Date"). On January 1, 2001 the Partnership did not renew its guarantee for a
new Time Horizon and currently operates without a principal protected
feature. This guarantee served only as a form of "stop loss," limiting the
maximum loss which investors who retain their Units until the Principal
Assurance Date can incur.

                  Through December 31, 2000, the highest month-end Net Asset
Value per Unit was $128.22 (December 31, 2000) and the lowest was $92.71 (April
30, 1994).

         (b)      Financial Information About Segments:
                  ------------------------------------

                  The Partnership's business constitutes only one segment for
financial reporting purposes, i.e., a speculative "commodity pool." The
Partnership does not engage in sales of goods or services.

         (c)      Narrative Description of Business:
                  ---------------------------------

                  GENERAL

                  The Partnership trades (currently, through its investment in
MM LLC) in futures, options on futures, forwards and options on forward
contracts in major sectors of the world economy, with the objective of achieving
substantial capital appreciation over time.

                  MLIP is the Partnership's trading manager, with responsibility
for selecting Advisors to manage MM LLC's assets, allocating and reallocating MM
LLC assets among different Advisors and determining the percentage of the
Partnership's assets to be invested in MM LLC.

                  Although considered as a whole, the Partnership (currently,
through an investment in MM LLC) trades in a diversified range of international
markets. Certain Advisors, considered individually, concentrate primarily
on trading in a limited portfolio of markets. The composition of the "sectors"
included in the Partnership's portfolio varies substantially over time.

                  MLIP may, from time to time, direct certain individual
Advisors to manage their Partnership accounts as if they were managing more
equity than the actual capital allocated to them.

                  One of the objectives of the Partnership is to provide
diversification for a limited portion of the risk segment of the Limited
Partners' portfolios. Commodity pool performance has historically demonstrated a
low degree of performance correlation with traditional stock and bond holdings.
Since it began trading, the Partnership's returns have, in fact, frequently been
non-correlated with the United States stock and bond markets.


                                      -2-
<PAGE>

                 MERRILL LYNCH'S PREVIOUS "PRINCIPAL PROTECTION" UNDERTAKING
TO THE PARTNERSHIP

                  Merrill Lynch, the parent company of the Merrill Lynch
organization, which includes MLIP and MLF, agreed to contribute sufficient
capital to the Partnership so that it would have adequate funds, after
adjustment for all liabilities to third parties, and so that the Net Asset
Value per Unit would be no less than $98.27 as of the second Principal
Assurance Date (December 31, 2000). This guarantee, which was effective only
as of the Principal Assurance Date, was a guarantee only of the minimum
assured Net Asset Value, (plus distributions, if any), not against the loss
of the use of time value of such investment or a guarantee of profit.
Merrill Lynch was not required to make any payments pursuant to this
guarantee. Such guarantee is no longer in place.

                  OPERATION OF THE PARTNERSHIP AFTER THE SECOND PRINCIPAL
                  ASSURANCE DATE

                  When the Partnership reached its first Principal Assurance
Date, MLIP "restarted" the Partnership's trading program and the Merrill
Lynch guarantee for a two-year period ending December 31, 2000.  MLIP
notified investors that they would continue to operate the Partnership
without a "principal protection" feature as of January 1, 2001.

                  USE OF PROCEEDS AND INTEREST INCOME

                  MARKET SECTORS

                  The Partnership (currently, through its investment in MM
LLC) trades in a diversified group of markets under the direction of multiple
independent Advisors. These Advisors from time to time materially alter the
allocation of their overall trading commitments among different market
sectors. Except in the case of certain trading programs which are
purposefully limited in the markets which they trade, there is essentially no
restriction on the commodity interests which may be traded by any Advisor or
the rapidity with which an Advisor may alter its market sector allocations.

                  MARKET TYPES

                  The Partnership trades (currently, through its investment
in MM LLC) on a variety of United States and foreign futures exchanges.
Substantially all of the Partnership's non-exchange trading takes place in
the highly liquid, institutionally-based currency forward markets.

                  Many of the Partnership's currency trades are executed in
the spot and forward foreign exchange markets (the "FX Markets") where there
are no direct execution costs. Instead, the participants, banks and dealers
in the FX Markets take a "spread" between the prices at which they are
prepared to buy and sell particular currencies and such spreads are built
into the pricing of the spot or forward contracts with the Partnership.
In its exchange of futures for physical ("EFP") trading, the Partnership
acquires cash currency positions through banks and dealers. The Partnership
pays a spread when it exchanges these positions for futures. This spread
reflects, in part, the different settlement dates of the cash and the futures
contracts, as well as prevailing interest rates, but also includes a pricing
spread in favor of the banks and dealers, which may include a Merrill Lynch
entity.

                  As in the case of its market sector allocations, the
Partnership's commitments to different types of markets -- U.S. and non-U.S.,
regulated and non-regulated -- differ substantially from time to time, as well
as over time.

                  CUSTODY OF ASSETS

                  The majority of the Partnership's assets are currently held
in customer accounts at Merrill Lynch.

                  CASH MANAGEMENT

                  As of June 2000, the Partnership, through MM LLC, began an
Income Enhancement Program, whereas, a portion of its assets is invested in
Commercial Paper. This was done to improve the yield on the cash assets not
required for margin for trading purposes at MLF. These holdings generally
have maturities of 30, 60 or 90 days and are held to maturity.

                                      -3-
<PAGE>

                  INTEREST PAID BY MERRILL LYNCH ON THE PARTNERSHIP'S U.S.
                  DOLLAR AND NON U.S. DOLLAR ASSETS

                  A portion of the Partnership's U.S. dollar assets are
maintained at MLF. On assets held in U.S. dollars, Merrill Lynch credits the
Partnership with interest at the prevailing 91-day U.S. Treasury bill rate.
The Partnership is credited with interest on any of its assets and net gains
actually held by Merrill Lynch in non-U.S. dollar currencies at a prevailing
local rate received by Merrill Lynch. Merrill Lynch may derive certain
economic benefit, in excess of the interest which Merrill Lynch pays to the
Partnership, from possession of such assets.

                  Merrill Lynch charges the Partnership Merrill Lynch's cost of
financing realized and unrealized losses on the Partnership's non-U.S.
dollar-denominated positions.
                                   -----------------------

                  CHARGES

                  The following table summarizes the charges incurred by the
Partnership during 2000, 1999 and 1998.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                          2000                     1999                     1998
                 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Average                  Average                     Average
                  Dollar       Month-End     Dollar     Month-End      Dollar       Month-End
   Charges        Amount       Net Assets    Amount     Net Assets     Amount      Net Assets
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>               <C>          <C>           <C>        <C>            <C>         <C>
Brokerage
Commissions       $     -          0.00%     $     -         0.00%      $166,505         0.75%
Administrative
Fees                    -          0.00%           -         0.00%         4,757         0.02%
                 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total             $     -          0.00%     $     -         0.00%      $171,262         0.77%
                 =============================================================================
</TABLE>

                               --------------------

                  Subsequent to October 1, 1996, Brokerage Commissions,
Administrative Fees and Profit Shares are not representative of the actual
amounts paid by the Partnership, because the Partnership paid the bulk of
these fees as an investor in the Trading LLCs or MM LLC. See "Description of
Current Charges." During 1999 and 2000, the Partnership had 100% of its
assets invested in MM LLC.

                  The foregoing table does not reflect the bid-ask spreads paid
by the Partnership on its forward trading, or the annual benefits which may be
derived by Merrill Lynch from the deposit of certain of the Partnership's U.S.
dollar assets in offset accounts.

                  The Partnership's average month-end Net Assets during 2000,
1999 and 1998 equaled $13,136,698, $17,064,997, and $22,237,083, respectively.

                  Subsequent to October 1, 1996, interest income is not
representative of the actual amounts received by the Partnership since a bulk
of the interest was received by the Partnership as an investor in the Trading
LLCs or MM LLC. During 1999 and 2000 the Partnership invested 100% of its
assets in MM LLC.

                  During 1998, the Partnership earned $289,431 in interest
income, or 1.30% of the Partnership's average month-end Net Assets.

                  The  variations in charges are primarily due to placing assets
in the Trading LLCs and MM LLC (See Item 7).


                                      -4-
<PAGE>


                               DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

RECIPIENT             NATURE OF PAYMENT            AMOUNT OF PAYMENT
---------             -----------------            -----------------
<S>                   <C>                          <C>
MLF                   Brokerage Commissions        A flat-rate monthly commission of 0.729 of 1% (a 8.75%
                                                   annual rate) of the Partnership's month-end assets
                                                   allocated to trading. As of December 31, 2000, 100% of
                                                   the Partnership's assets were allocated to trading in
                                                   MM LLC.

                                                   Prior to the Investment in MM LLC, the round-turn
                                                   (each purchase and sale or sale and purchase of a
                                                   single futures contract) equivalent rate of the Partnership's
                                                   flat-rate Brokerage Commissions for the year ended
                                                   December 31, 1998 was approximately $54.  During 1999 and 2000,
                                                   the Partnership paid round-turn commissions through its
                                                   investment in MM LLC.  The estimated aggregate round-turn
                                                   commission rates for MM LLC for the years ended December 31,
                                                   2000 and 1999 are $82 and $136, respectively.

MLF                   Use of Partnership assets    Merrill Lynch may derive certain economic benefits from the
                                                   deposit of certain of the Partnership's U.S. dollar assets
                                                   in offset accounts.

MLIP                  Administrative Fees          The Partnership pays MLIP a monthly Administrative Fee
                                                   equal to 0.021 of 1% (a 0.25% annual rate) of the Partnership's
                                                   month-end assets allocated to trading. As of December 31, 2000,
                                                   100% of the Partnership's assets were allocated to trading in
                                                   MM LLC. MLIP pays all of the Partnership's routine administrative
                                                   costs.

Other                 Bid-ask spreads              Bid-ask spreads on forward and related trades.
Counterparties

Advisors              Profit Shares                All Advisors can receive quarterly or annual Profit
                                                   Shares ranging from 20% to 23% (depending on the
                                                   Advisor) of any New Trading Profit achieved by
                                                   their Partnership account. Profit Shares are also paid
                                                   upon redemption of Units and upon the net reallocation
                                                   of assets away from an Advisor. New Trading Profit is
                                                   calculated separately in respect of each Advisor,
                                                   irrespective of the overall performance of the
                                                   Partnership. The Partnership and MM LLC may pay
                                                   substantial Profit Shares during periods when it is
                                                   incurring significant overall losses.

Advisors              Consulting Fees              MLF currently pays the Advisors annual Consulting Fees up
                                                   to 2% of the Partnership's average month-end assets
                                                   allocated to them for management, after reduction for a
                                                   portion of the brokerage commissions.

MLF;                  Extraordinary expenses       Actual costs incurred; none paid to date.
  Others
</TABLE>

                                      -5-


<PAGE>



                  REGULATION

                  MLIP, the Advisors and MLF are each subject to regulation
by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the "CFTC") and the National
Futures Association ("NFA"). Other than in respect of its periodic reporting
requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Partnership
itself is generally not subject to regulation by the Securities and Exchange
Commission. However, MLIP itself is registered as an "investment adviser"
under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

                  (i) through (xii)-- not applicable.

                  (xiii)  The Partnership has no employees.

         (d)      FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC OPERATIONS
                  AND EXPORT SALES:

                  The Partnership trades, through its investment in MM LLC, on a
number of foreign commodity exchanges. The Partnership does not engage in the
sales of goods or services.

ITEM 2:  PROPERTIES

                  The Partnership does not use any physical properties in the
conduct of its business.

                  The Partnership's only place of business is the place of
business of MLIP (Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc., Princeton Corporate
Campus, 800 Scudders Mill Road - Section 2G, Plainsboro, New Jersey 08536).
MLIP performs all administrative services for the Partnership from the MLIP's
offices.

ITEM 3:  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

                  Merrill Lynch -- the sole stockholder of Merrill Lynch Group,
Inc. (which is the sole stockholder of MLIP) -- as well as certain of its
subsidiaries and affiliates have been named as defendants in civil actions,
arbitration proceedings and claims arising out of their respective business
activities. Although the ultimate outcome of these actions cannot be predicted
at this time and the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with
certainty, it is the opinion of management that the result of these matters will
not be materially adverse to the business operations of financial condition of
MLIP or the Partnership.

                  MLIP itself has never been the subject of any material
litigation.

ITEM 4:  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

                  The Partnership has never submitted any matter to a vote of
its Limited Partners.

                                     PART II

ITEM 5:  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Item 5(a)

         (a)      MARKET INFORMATION:

                  There is no established public trading market for the
Units, nor will one develop. Limited Partners may redeem Units as of the end
of each month at Net Asset Value.

                                      -6-
<PAGE>

         (b)      HOLDERS:

                  As of December 31, 2000, there were 584 holders of Units,
including MLIP.

         (c)      DIVIDENDS:

                  The Partnership has made no distributions, nor does MLIP
presently intend to make any distributions in the future.

Item 5(b)

                  Not applicable.

ITEM 6:  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected financial data has been derived from the audited
financial statements of the Partnership:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  FOR THE YEAR     FOR THE YEAR      FOR THE YEAR     FOR THE YEAR        FOR THE YEAR
                                     ENDED            ENDED             ENDED            ENDED                ENDED
                                  DECEMBER 31,     DECEMBER 31,      DECEMBER 31,     DECEMBER 31,         DECEMBER 31,
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS              2000             1999              1998             1997                  1996
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                               <C>             <C>              <C>               <C>                <C>
Revenues:

Trading (Loss) Profit:
     Realized (Loss)               $       -        $       -      $   (267,771)     $   222,536         $  4,174,847
     Change in Unrealized                  -                -          (112,024)          51,814           (2,454,976)
                                  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Total Trading Results                 -                -          (379,795)         274,350            1,719,871
                                  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest Income                            -                -           289,431          790,813            1,661,887
                                  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Total Revenues                        -                -           (90,364)       1,065,163            3,381,758
                                  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Expenses:
     Brokerage Commissions                 -                -           166,505          519,637            2,243,462
     Administrative Fees                   -                -             4,757           14,688               57,524
     Profit Shares                         -                -                 -            2,914              434,053
                                  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Total Expenses                        -                -           171,262          537,239            2,735,039
                                  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income (Loss) from Investments       603,225         (213,362)        1,036,655        1,679,221              984,327
                                  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net Income (Loss)                  $ 603,225      $  (213,362)      $   775,029       $2,207,145         $  1,631,046
                                  =========================================================================================
</TABLE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  DECEMBER 31,      DECEMBER 31,        DECEMBER 31,        DECEMBER 31,         DECEMBER 31,
BALANCE SHEET DATA                    2000              1999                1998                1997                 1996
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                               <C>               <C>                 <C>                 <C>                  <C>
Partnership Net Asset Value        $12,483,383       $15,298,518         $19,571,183         $26,918,481          $30,946,907
Net Asset Value per Unit               $128.22           $121.41             $122.84             $117.64              $108.85
                                  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

The variations in income statement line items are primarily due to investing in
Trading LLCs and in MM LLC.

                                      -7-


<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      MONTH-END NET ASSET VALUE PER UNIT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Jan.     Feb.     Mar.    Apr.      May     June     July     Aug.    Sept.    Oct.     Nov.     Dec.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>     <C>      <C>     <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>     <C>      <C>      <C>     <C>
  1996  $107.43  $103.23 $105.23  $108.01  $104.83  $104.48   $98.33  $99.85  $101.79  $106.19  $110.86 $108.85
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  1997  $110.66  $112.34 $112.02  $110.16  $109.61  $110.30  $116.70 $112.09  $115.05  $113.71  $114.47 $117.64
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  1998  $117.10  $117.18 $116.93  $112.78  $114.81  $114.98  $115.21 $120.33  $122.49  $122.27  $122.38 $122.84
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  1999  $121.29  $122.74 $122.19  $123.53  $122.56  $123.02  $123.26 $122.43  $120.65  $117.35  $120.50 $121.41
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  2000  $121.82  $120.90 $118.80  $118.95  $120.71  $119.23  $117.52 $117.90  $114.34  $114.54  $121.07 $128.22
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

                      THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND (SM) VI L.P.
                                DECEMBER 31, 2000

      TYPE OF POOL: SELECTED-ADVISOR/PUBLICLY-OFFERED/"PRINCIPAL PROTECTED"(1)
                    INCEPTION OF TRADING: September 10, 1993
                      AGGREGATE SUBSCRIPTIONS: $108,693,900
                       CURRENT CAPITALIZATION: $12,483,383
                    WORST MONTHLY DRAWDOWN(2): (5.89)% (7/96)
             WORST PEAK-TO-VALLEY DRAWDOWN(3): (8.97)% (5/96-8/96)

                                   -------------

              NET ASSET VALUE PER UNIT, DECEMBER 31, 2000: $128.22

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          MONTHLY RATES OF RETURN(4)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    MONTH                 2000       1999       1998       1997      1996
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    <S>                 <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>
    January                 0.34%    (1.26)%    (0.46)%     1.66%      3.25%
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    February               (0.75)     1.20       0.07       1.52      (3.91)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    March                  (1.74)    (0.45)     (0.21)     (0.28)      1.94
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    April                   0.13      1.10      (3.55)     (1.66)      2.64
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    May                     1.48     (0.79)      1.79      (0.50)     (2.95)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    June                   (1.23)     0.38       0.16       0.63      (0.33)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    July                   (1.43)     0.20       0.20       5.80      (5.89)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    August                  0.33     (0.67)      4.44      (3.95)      1.55
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    September              (3.02)    (1.45)      1.80       2.64       1.95
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    October                 0.17     (2.74)     (0.18)     (1.16)      4.32
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    November                5.70      2.68       0.09       0.67       4.40
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    December                5.91      0.76       0.38       2.77      (1.82)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Compound Annual
    Rate of Return          5.62%    (1.17)%     4.43%      8.08%      4.61%
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


                                      -8-
<PAGE>

                  (1) Pursuant to applicable CFTC regulations, a
"Multi-Advisor" fund is defined as one that allocates no more than 25% of its
trading assets (i.e., assets committed to trading) to any single manager. As
the Partnership may allocate more than 25% of its trading assets to one or
more Advisors, it is referred to as a "Selected-Advisor" fund. Applicable
CFTC regulations define a "Principal Protected" fund as one which is designed
to limit the loss of participants' initial investment. Until December 31,
2000, MLIP's trading leverage policies and the Merrill Lynch guarantee
limited Limited Partners' losses on their Units at the Principal Assurance
Date to 20% of the Net Asset Value of their Units as of the beginning of each
new Time Horizon. The Principal Protection feature was discontinued as of
January 1, 2001.

                  (2) Worst Monthly Drawdown represents the largest negative
Monthly Rate of Return experienced since January 1, 1996 by the Partnership; a
drawdown is measured on the basis of month-end Net Asset Value only, and does
not reflect intra-month figures.

                  (3) Worst Peak-to-Valley Drawdown represents the greatest
percentage decline since January 1, 1996 from a month-end cumulative Monthly
Rate of Return without such cumulative Monthly Rate of Return being equaled or
exceeded as of a subsequent month-end. For example, if the Monthly Rate of
Return was (1)% in each of January and February, 1% in March and (2)% in April,
the Peak-to-Valley Drawdown would still be continuing at the end of April in the
amount of approximately (3)%, whereas if the Monthly Rate of Return had been
approximately 3% in March, the Peak-to-Valley Drawdown would have ended as of
the end of February at approximately the (2)% level.

                  (4) Monthly Rate of Return is the net performance of the
Partnership during the month of determination (including interest income and
after all expenses have been accrued or paid) divided by the total equity of the
Partnership as of the beginning of such month.

ITEM 7:  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
         OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     ADVISOR SELECTIONS

                  The Partnership's results of operations depend on MLIP's
ability to select Advisors and the Advisors' ability to trade profitably. MLIP's
selection procedures and trading leveraging analysis, as well as the Advisors'
trading methods, are confidential, so that substantially the only available
information relevant to the Partnership's results of operations is its actual
performance record to date. Because of the speculative nature of its trading,
the Partnership's past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future
results.

                  MLIP has made and expects to continue making frequent changes
to both trading asset allocations among Advisors and Advisor combinations as
well as from time to time adjusting the percentage of the Partnership's assets
committed to trading.

                  MLIP's decision to terminate or reallocate assets among
Advisors is based on a combination of numerous factors. Advisors are, in
general, terminated primarily for unsatisfactory performance, but other factors
-- for example, a change in MLIP's or an Advisor's market outlook, apparent
deviation from announced risk control policies, excessive turnover of positions,
changes in principals, commitment of resources to other business activities,
etc. -- may also have a role in the termination or reallocation decision. The
market judgment and experience of MLIP's principals is an important factor in
its asset allocation decisions.

                  MLIP has no timetable or schedule for making Advisor changes
or reallocations, and generally makes a medium- to long-term commitment to all
Advisors selected. There can be no assurance as to the frequency or number of
Advisor changes that may take place in the future, or as to how long any of the
current Advisors will continue to manage assets for the Partnership.


                                      -9-
<PAGE>

                  GENERAL

                  A number of the Advisors are trend-following traders, whose
programs do not attempt to predict price movements. No fundamental economic
supply or demand analyses are used by these Advisors, and no macroeconomic
assessments of the relative strengths of different national economies or
economic sectors are evaluated. Instead, the programs apply proprietary
computer models to analyze past market data, and from this data alone attempt
to determine whether market prices are trending. These technical traders base
their strategies on the theory that market prices reflect the collective
judgment of numerous different traders and are, accordingly, the best and
most efficient indication of market movements. However, there are frequent
periods during which fundamental factors external to the market dominate
prices.

                  If a trend-following Advisor's models identify a trend, they
signal positions which follow it. When these models identify the trend as having
ended or reversed, these positions are either closed out or reversed. Due to
their trend-following character, these Advisors' programs do not predict either
the commencement or the end of a price movement. Rather, their objective is to
identify a trend early enough to profit from it and detect its end or reversal
in time to close out the Partnership's positions while retaining most of the
profits made from following the trend.

                  In analyzing the performance of trend-following programs,
economic conditions, political events, weather factors, etc., are not directly
relevant because only market data has any input into trading results.
Furthermore, there is no direct connection between particular market conditions
and price trends. There are so many influences on the markets that the same
general type of economic event may lead to a price trend in some cases but not
in others. The analysis is further complicated by the fact that the programs are
designed to recognize only certain types of trends and to apply only certain
criteria of when a trend has begun. Consequently, even though significant price
trends may occur, if these trends are not comprised of the type of intra-period
price movements which the programs are designed to identify, a trend-following
Advisor may miss the trend altogether.

                  In the case of the Advisors which implement strategies which
rely more on discretion and market judgment, it is not possible to predict, from
their performance during past market cycles, how they will respond to future
market events.

                  PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

                  This performance summary is an outline description of how the
Partnership performed in the past, not necessarily any indication of how it will
perform in the future. In addition, the general causes to which certain price
movements are attributed may or may not in fact have caused such movements, but
simply occurred at or about the same time.

                  The Advisors, as a group, are unlikely to be profitable in
markets in which such trends do not occur. Static or erratic prices are likely
to result in losses. Similarly, unexpected events (for example, a political
upheaval, natural disaster or governmental intervention) can lead to major
short-term losses as well as gains.

                  While there can be no assurance that any Advisor will be
profitable, under any given market condition, markets in which substantial and
sustained price movements occur typically offer the best profit potential for
the Partnership.

                  The performance of the Partnership is also materially affected
by the percentage of its assets allocated to trading. The greater the percentage
of the Partnership's assets allocated to trading, the greater its profit
potential, risk and performance volatility.


                                      -10-
<PAGE>

                  2000

                  During 2000, all of the Partnership's assets were invested
in MM LLC.  The Partnership received trading profits and losses as an investor
in MM LLC.  The following commentary of 2000 describes the trading results for
MM LLC during the year.

                  The Partnership's overall trading strategy was profitable for
2000. Gains were realized by trading in the interest rate, currency and
energy markets. Losses were sustained in the agricultural, metals and stock
index sectors. Trading was volatile and unprofitable through September,
however, gains realized in the interest rate and currency markets in November
and December eradicated those losses.

                  Interest rate trading was profitable for the Partnership.
Short Eurodollar trading was profitable early in the year as the European
Union ministers blamed the Euro's decline on rapid U.S. growth and fears that
the Federal Reserve would continue to increase interest rates. By mid year,
losses were incurred from U.S. Treasury bond and Euro 10- year bond trading
as investors shifted to Treasuries due to increased volatility in the NASDAQ
and other equity markets. Short Eurodollar turned unprofitable as the Euro
improved after the European Central Bank's 50 basis point repo rate hike.
Uncertainty surrounding the U.S. Presidential election caused investors to
favor the bond markets over equities, resulting in significant gains for the
Partnership's various long positions.

                  Trading in the currency markets was also successful. Short
euro positions were profitable after officials from the Group of Seven met in
January and failed to express concern about the low levels of the currency.
Despite steep interest rate hikes by the Swiss National Bank ("SNB") and the
general weakness of the Euro, the SNB said it will not keep the Swiss franc
from rising. Short British pound positions were profitable as the pound was
weak in the wake of the Bank of England's references to "sterling
overvaluation". Short Japanese yen trading yielded gains in July as the yen
finished weaker against the U.S. dollar in anticipation that the U.S. Federal
Reserve would continue to raise interest rates. Short positions in the
Canadian dollar resulted in gains as the currency weakened during November
despite worsening U.S. dollar fundamentals, a large Canadian budget surplus
and plans for tax cuts in Canada.

                  Energy trading was profitable throughout the year as prices
continued to surge. Despite the possibility of OPEC increasing oil
production, crude oil prices continued to rise as such a hike would still
leave oil inventories much below normal. Light crude oil prices continued to
rise in June even though OPEC agreed to increase production on July 1. The
market was looking for a larger production hike. By November, oil prices were
pushed higher as a result of significantly lower temperatures than the
previous year, combined with a large inventory deficit.

                  Agriculture trading sustained modest losses for the year.
Corn prices fluctuated early on numerous changes in weather forecasts. A
USDA grain crop report projected a 12% rise in soybean inventories from the
previous season. This led to fears of an abundance of supply, lowering
prices. Short wheat trading was beneficial in July as drought warnings issued
in early spring proved inaccurate. As a result of good global grain and
oilseed crops, supply exceeded demand, resulting in profits in short soyoil
positions at year-end.

                  Metals trading alternated between profitability to
unprofitability during the year. Copper trading resulted in losses after a
Freeport, Indonesia mine announced output cuts would not be as severe,
damaging the Partnership's long positions. Gold prices declined for most of
2000 as investors were discouraged from the drop in the euro, severe weakness
in the Australian dollar along with sharp decreases in the South African rand
and Indian rupee. Nickel prices declined from slowing demand for stainless
steel in Europe and Asia.

                  Stock index markets trading was unprofitable during a
volatile year. Signs of rising inflation fueled fears that the Federal
Reserve would continue to raise interest rates aggressively to slow the
economy. S&P 500 positions sustained losses as buyers retreated due to fears
of an U.S. economic slowdown. Long positions were generally unprofitable
throughout the year, with minimal gains realized from the Partnership's
short positions.


                                      -11-
<PAGE>

1999

                  During 1999, all of the Partnership's assets were invested
in MM LLC. The Partnership received trading profits and losses as an investor
in MM LLC. The following commentary for 1999 describes the trading results
for MM LLC during the year.

                  The Partnership finished 1999 with gains in energy, stock
index and agricultural trading and losses in currency, interest rate and
metal trading. Commodities spent 1999 in a transition phase, shifting from
bearishness to a more neutral position. Lack of demand, particularly in Asia,
was the dominant factor in the overall decline in commodity prices.

                  Overall, the Partnership profited from trading in crude
oil, heating oil, and unleaded gas in 1999. Positions in crude oil offset
losses from short positions in natural gas and gas oil trading. In March,
OPEC ratified new production cuts totaling 1.716 million barrels per day at
its conference, which resulted in higher prices for crude. In the natural gas
markets, prices rallied sharply resulting from a decline in U.S. natural gas
production, along with high levels of energy consumption and weather scares
throughout the country. Near the end of the year, there was a continued
upward momentum in crude oil reflecting the tightening between supply and
demand and a new, higher OPEC-indicated target price.

                  Stock index trading was profitable for the first half of
1999. Also of note, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed above the 10,000
mark for the first time ever at the end of March, setting a record for the
index, and equity markets rallied worldwide in April and June. In the second
half of the year, the Partnership suffered losses in stock index positions as
trading was mixed due to significant volatility globally. However, there was
profitable trading in Hang Seng, Nikkei 225 and Topix Indices which resulted
in gains during November and December. Such activity depicted evidence of
Japan's stronger-than-expected recovery coupled with a sudden decline in its
unemployment rate.

                  In agricultural trading, gains in live hogs and live cattle
offset losses in corn positions. Initially, the corn market continued to
struggle due to supply/demand imbalances and ongoing favorable weather in South
America. These factors also led to an increase in prices as there was a sharp
decline in crop ratings during the second half of the year. There was also a
sharp upturn in soy prices, and losses in coffee trading became evident due to
cold temperature and lack of rainfall in Brazil.

                  Currency trading produced losses for the Partnership
throughout the year. Long Japanese yen positions resulted in losses despite
the yen trading higher against the U.S. dollar. The Bank of Japan lowered
rates to keep its economy sufficiently liquid to allow fiscal spending to
restore some growth to the economy and to drive down the surging yen. The
European Central Bank raised the repo rate in November due to inflation
pressures. On a trade-weighted basis, the Swiss franc ended the first quarter
to close at a seven-month low, mostly as a result of the stronger U.S.
dollar. The Canadian dollar also underwent similar fluctuations throughout
the year.

                  Interest rate trading was also volatile as the flight to
quality in the bond market reversed during the first half of 1999 and the
Federal Reserve raised interest rates three times during the year. Early in
the year, interest rate trading proved unprofitable for the Partnership,
which was triggered by the Japanese Trust Fund Bureau's decision to absorb a
smaller share of futures issues, leaving the burden of financing future
budget deficits to the private sector. Interest rate trading did gain
strength at mid-year as the flight to quality in the bond market reversed and
concerns about higher interest rates in the U.S. continued to rattle the
financial markets. During the third quarter, Eurodollar trading generated
losses amidst speculation of the probability of a tightening by the U.S.
Federal Reserve, which became evident with the higher interest rates in their
November 16 meeting due to concerns of inflation. In December, the yield on
the 30-year Treasury bond recently surpassed its October high propelled by
inflation worries and fears the Federal Reserve might tighten further in 2000.


                                      -12-
<PAGE>

                  Metals trading was mixed for the year as gold played a
major part in the volatility of the metals market. Gold had failed to
maintain its status as a safety vehicle and a monetary asset during the first
half of 1999. In early June, gold had reached its lowest level in over 20
years. A major statement from the president of the European Central Bank
stated that the member banks had agreed not to expand their gold lending.
This sent gold prices sharply higher in late September. Unfortunately, the
Partnership held short positions in gold futures at that time. Gold prices
had stabilized in the fourth quarter following the price surge. Early in the
year, burdensome warehouse stocks and questionable demand prospects weighed
on base metals as aluminum fell to a five-year low and copper fell to nearly
an 11-year low. The economic scenario for Asia, Brazil, Europe and emerging
market nations helped to keep copper and other base metals on the defensive
as demand receded with virtually no supply side response in the second
quarter. A substantial increase in Chinese imports combined with the recovery
in the rest of Asia and Europe had significantly improved demand for aluminum
pushing prices higher during December.

1998

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          Total Trading
                                             Results
<S>                                    <C>

 Interest Rates                           $  (39,575)
 Stock Indicies                             (208,161)
 Commodities                                 (38,600)
 Currencies                                 (103,404)
 Energy                                       37,352
 Metals                                      (27,407)
                                      -----------------
                                          $ (379,795)
                                      =================
</TABLE>

                  Global interest rate markets provided the Partnership with
its most profitable positions for the first quarter, particularly in European
bonds where an extended bond market rally continued despite an environment of
robust growth in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, as well as
a strong pick-up in growth in continental Europe. In the second quarter,
swings in the U.S. dollar and developments in Japan affected bond markets,
causing the Partnership's interest rate trading to result in losses. This was
turned around in the third quarter, as markets worldwide were turned upside
down and the Partnership's non-correlation with general equity and debt
markets was strongly exhibited, and trading was particularly profitable in
positions in Eurodollars, German and Japanese bonds, and U.S. Treasury notes
and bonds. Global investors staged a major flight to quality, resulting in a
significant widening of credit spreads on a global basis. In October,
investors pushed the yields on U.S. Treasury bonds to a 31-year low. The long
bond yield fell about 75 basis points in 1998 as the world economy slowed
more than expected, inflation continued to fall, the anticipated small U.S.
budget deficit turned into substantial surplus, and the Fed lowered interest
rates.

                  In currency markets, results early in the year were
unprofitable. During the second quarter, strong gains were realized in
positions in the Japanese yen, which weakened during June to an eight-year
low versus the U.S. dollar. Significant gains from Japanese yen trading
continued into the third quarter, and Japan's problems spread to other
sectors of the global economy, causing commodities prices to decline as
demand from the Asian economies weakened. Japan's deepening recession and
credit crunch continued through the fourth quarter, and the Partnership
achieved gains from long yen positions.


                                      -13-
<PAGE>

                  Trading results in stock index markets were also mixed in
early 1998, despite a strong first-quarter performance by the U.S. equity
market as several consecutive weekly gains were recorded with most market
averages setting new highs. Second quarter results were profitable as the
Asia-Pacific region's equity markets weakened across the board. In
particular, Hong Kong's Hang Seng index trended downward during most of the
second quarter and traded at a three-year low. As U.S. equity markets
declined in July and August, the Partnership profited from short positions in
the S&P 500, most notably during August, when the index dropped 14.5%.
Volatility in September made for a difficult trading environment in the stock
index sector, and the Partnership incurred modest losses, although results
remained profitable for the quarter and the year overall in these markets.

                  In agricultural commodity markets, 1998 began with strong
gains as live cattle and hog prices trended downward throughout the first
quarter. In the second quarter, although the U.S. soybean crop got off to a
good start which contributed to higher yield expectations and a more
burdensome supply outlook, soybean prices traded in a volatile pattern. Sugar
futures maintained mostly a downtrend, as no major buyers emerged to support
the market. Similarly, coffee prices trended downward, as good weather
conditions in Central America and Mexico increased the prospects of more
output from these countries. The third quarter resulted in losses as the U.S.
soybean crop increased relative to the USDA's production estimate as a result
of timely rains, which contributed to lower prices. These losses continued
into the fourth quarter as the Partnership was caught on the short side of
the soybean complex, as the soybean supply surplus became more manageable
following the November 10th USDA reports, causing prices to gain upward
momentum.

                  Gold prices began the year drifting sideways, and continued to
weaken following news in the second quarter of a European Central Bank consensus
that ten to fifteen percent of reserves should be made up of gold bullion, which
was at the low end of expectations. Gold was unable to extend third quarter
rallies or to build any significant upside momentum, resulting in a trendless
environment. This was also the case in the fourth quarter, as gold's cost of
production declined. Also, silver markets remained range-bound, while also
experiencing a significant selloff in November, and aluminum traded at its
lowest levels since 1994, with many aluminum smelters operating at a loss.

                  In energy markets, demand for crude oil in the Middle East
was affected by low oil prices early in the year, and trading resulted in
losses. Initially buoyed on concerns about a U.S.-led military strike against
Iraq, crude oil fell to a nine-year low, as the globally warm winter, the
return of Iraq as a producer and the Asian economic crisis added to OPEC's
supply glut problems. Despite production cuts initiated by OPEC at the end of
March, world oil supplies remained excessive and oil prices stood at
relatively low levels throughout the first half of 1998. Short heating oil
positions in the third quarter proved profitable for the Partnership as the
market for heating oil prices dropped to its lowest level in more than a
decade. In early December, oil and natural gas prices dropped sharply, causing
continued problems for many emerging market countries that depend on commodity
exports for economic growth and government financing. These price pressures
were mainly due to excessive supply availability and near-term weather
indications that inventories would remain at more than adequate levels even in
the event of a cold Northern Hemisphere winter. Also, the December U.S. air
attack on Iraq failed to cause any damage to oil pumping and shipping
operations, and oil prices fell over 10%.

VARIABLES AFFECTING PERFORMANCE

                  The principal variables which determine the net performance of
the Partnership are gross profitability and interest income. Gross profitability
is, in turn, effected by the percentage of the Partnership's assets allocated to
trading.


                                      -14-
<PAGE>

                  During all periods set forth under "Selected Financial
Data," the interest rates in many countries were at unusually low levels. The
interest rates in the United States (although higher than in many other
countries) negatively impacted revenues because interest income is typically
a major component of the Partnership's profitability. In addition, low
interest rates are frequently associated with reduced fixed income market
volatility, and in static markets the Partnership's profit potential
generally tends to be diminished. On the other hand, during periods of higher
interest rates, the relative attractiveness of a high risk investment such as
the Partnership may be reduced as compared to high yielding and much lower
risk fixed-income investments.

                  The Partnership's Brokerage Commissions and Administrative
Fees are a constant percentage of the Partnership's assets allocated to trading.
The only Partnership costs (other than the insignificant currency trading costs)
which are not based on a percentage of the Partnership's assets (allocated to
trading or total) are the Profit Shares payable to the Advisors on an
Advisor-by-Advisor basis. Gross profitability is in turn affected by the
percentages of the Partnership's assets allocated to trading. During periods
when Profit Shares are a high percentage of net trading gains, it is likely that
there has been substantial performance non-correlation among the Advisors (so
that the total Profit Shares paid to those Advisors which have traded profitably
are a high percentage, or perhaps even in excess, of the total profits
recognized, as other Advisors have incurred offsetting losses, reducing overall
trading gains but not the Profit Shares paid to the successful Advisors) --
suggesting the likelihood of generally trendless, non-consensus markets.

                  Unlike many investment fields, there is no meaningful
distinction in the operation of the Partnership between realized and unrealized
profits. Most of the contracts traded by the Partnership are highly liquid and
can be closed out at any time.

                  Except in unusual circumstances, factors (e.g. regulatory
approvals, cost of goods sold, employee relations and the like) which often
materially affect an operating business have virtually no impact on the
Partnership.

LIQUIDITY; CAPITAL RESOURCES

                  The Partnership borrows only to a limited extent and only on a
strictly short-term basis in order to finance losses on non-U.S. dollar
denominated trading positions pending the conversion of the Partnership's dollar
deposits. These borrowings are at a prevailing short-term rate in the relevant
currency. They have been immaterial to the Partnership's operation to date and
are expected to continue to be so.

                  Substantially all of the Partnership's assets are held in
cash. The Net Asset Value of the Partnership's cash is not affected by
inflation. However, changes in interest rates could cause periods of strong up
or down price trends, during which the Partnership's profit potential generally
increases. Inflation in commodity prices could also generate price movements
which the strategies might successfully follow.

                  Except in very unusual circumstances, the Partnership should
be able to close out any or all of its open trading positions and liquidate any
or all of its contract holdings quickly and at market prices. This permits an
Advisor to limit losses as well as reduce market exposure on short notice should
its strategies indicate doing so. In addition, because there is a readily
available market value for the Partnership's positions and assets, the
Partnership's monthly Net Asset Value calculations are precise, and investors
need only wait ten business days to receive the full redemption proceeds of
their Units.

ITEM 7A: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

                  Not applicable.


                                      -15-
<PAGE>

ITEM 8:  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

                  The financial statements required by this Item are included in
Exhibit 13.01.

                  The supplementary financial information ("selected quarterly
financial data" and "information about oil and gas producing activities")
specified by Item 302 of Regulation S-K is not applicable.

ITEM 9:  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
         FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

                  There were no changes in or disagreements with independent
auditors on accounting or financial disclosure.

                                    PART III

ITEM 10:  DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

         (a,b)    Identification of Directors and Executive Officers:
                  --------------------------------------------------

                  As a limited partnership, the Partnership itself has no
officers or directors and is managed by MLIP. Trading decisions are made by the
Advisors on behalf of the Partnership. MLIP promotes the Partnership and is
its controlling person.

                  The directors and executive officers of MLIP and their
respective business backgrounds are as follows:

RONALD S. ROSENBERG        Chairman and Director

FABIO P. SAVOLDELLI        President and Director

FRANK M. MACIOCE           Vice President and Director

STEVEN B. OLGIN            Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer
                           and Director

MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO        Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


                  Ronald S. Rosenberg was born in 1962. Mr. Rosenberg is
Chairman and a Director of MLIP and head of the Alternative Investments Group
for MLIM Americas, which creates alternative investment products and
strategies for Merrill Lynch's large institutional and high net worth private
clients. These products include funds of funds investing in hedge funds,
private equity funds, exchange funds, as well as other specialized investment
products. Most recently, Mr. Rosenberg ran the Global Hedge Fund Sales Group
and International Fixed Income Groups which sold investment products to hedge
funds worldwide. He joined Merrill Lynch in 1995 from JP Morgan, where he was
also responsible for sales groups that sold investment products to hedge
funds. Mr. Rosenberg was educated at the Wharton Business School, where he
received a Master of Business Administration in Finance. He graduated Phi
Beta Kappa from Rutgers University with a Bachelor of Arts in Computer
Science and Economics.

                  Fabio P. Savoldelli was born in 1961. Mr. Savoldelli is
President and a Director of MLIP. He will oversee the Partnership's
investments. Most recently, Mr. Savoldelli was Chief Investment Officer for
the Americas at the Chase Manhattan Private Bank, responsible for managers
investing assets in international and domestic institutional, private client
and ERISA funds. Previously, he was Deputy Chief Investment Officer and Head
of Fixed Income and Foreign Exchange at Swiss Bank Corp. London Portfolio
Management International. Mr. Savoldelli was educated at the University of
Windsor, Canada, and the London School of Economics.

                                      -16-
<PAGE>

                  Frank M. Macioce was born in 1945. Mr. Macioce is a Vice
President and a Director of MLIP and the senior legal counsel responsible for
Alternative Investments. He joined MLIM in February 2000. From 1995 to 2000, Mr.
Macioce was General Counsel of Operations, Services and Technology for Merrill
Lynch, and from 1993 to 1995 served as Merrill Lynch Investment Banking General
Counsel. From 1980 to 1993 he served as Assistant General Counsel of Merrill
Lynch responsible for Corporate Law. During his 28 years with Merrill Lynch, he
has served as a director and officer of a number of its affiliates. Mr. Macioce
graduated from Purdue University with a Bachelor of Science in Economics and
Psychology in 1967 and from Vanderbilt Law School with a Juris Doctor in 1972.
Mr. Macioce is a member of the New York Bar.

                  Steven B. Olgin was born in 1960. Mr. Olgin is Vice
President, Chief Administrative Officer and Director of MLIP. He joined
MLIP in July 1994 and became a Vice President in July 1995. From 1986 until
July 1994, Mr. Olgin was an associate of the law firm of Sidley & Austin. In
1982, Mr. Olgin graduated from The American University with a Bachelor of
Science in Business Administration and a Bachelor of Arts in Economics. In
1986, he received his Juris Doctor from The John Marshall Law School. Mr.
Olgin is a member of the Managed Funds Association's Government Relations
Committee and has served as an arbitrator for the National Futures
Association. Mr. Olgin is a member of the Illinois Bar.

                  Michael L. Pungello was born in 1957. Mr. Pungello is Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of MLIP. He was First Vice
President and Senior Director of Finance for Merrill Lynch's Operations,
Services and Technology Group from January 1998 to March 1999. Prior to that,
Mr. Pungello spent over 18 years with Deloitte & Touche LLP, and was a
partner in their financial services practice from June 1990 to December 1997.
He graduated from Fordham University in 1979 with a Bachelor of Science in
Accounting and received his Master of Business Administration in Finance from
New York University in 1987.

                  As of December 31, 2000, the principals of MLIP had no
investment in the Partnership, and MLIP's general partner interest in the
Partnership was valued at $135,803.

                  MLIP acts as general partner to eleven public futures funds
whose units of limited partnership interest are registered under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934: The Futures Expansion Fund Limited
Partnership, ML Futures Investments II L.P., ML Futures Investments L.P.,
John W. Henry & Co./Millburn L.P., The SECTOR Strategy Fund (SM) II L.P., The
SECTOR Strategy Fund (SM) V L.P., The SECTOR Strategy Fund (SM) L.P., ML
Global Horizons L.P., ML Principal Protection L.P., ML JWH Strategic
Allocation Fund L.P. and the Partnership. Because MLIP serves as the sole
general partner of each of these funds, the officers and directors of MLIP
effectively manage them as officers and directors of such funds.

         (c)      Identification of Certain Significant Employees:
                  -----------------------------------------------

                  None.

         (d)      Family Relationships:
                  --------------------

                  None.

         (e)      Business Experience:
                  -------------------

                  See Item 10(a)(b) above.

         (f)      Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings:
                  ----------------------------------------

                  None.

         (g)      Promoters and Control Persons:
                  -----------------------------

                  Not applicable.


                                      -17-
<PAGE>

ITEM 11:  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

                  The directors and officers of MLIP are remunerated by MLIP.
The Partnership does not itself have any officers, directors or employees.
The Partnership pays Brokerage Commissions to an affiliate of MLIP and
Administrative Fees to MLIP. MLIP or its affiliates may also receive certain
economic benefits from holding the Partnership's dollar assets. The directors
and officers receive no "other compensation" from the Partnership, and the
directors receive no compensation for serving as directors of MLIP. There are
no compensation plans or arrangements relating to a change in control of
either MLIP or the Partnership.

ITEM 12:  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

         (a)      Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners:
                  -----------------------------------------------

                  As of December 31, 2000, no person or "group" is known to be
or have been the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Units.

         (b)      Security Ownership of Management:
                  --------------------------------

                  As of December 31, 2000, MLIP owned 1059 Units
(unit-equivalent general partnership interests), which was less than 1.1% of
the total Units outstanding.

         (c)      Changes in Control:
                  ------------------

                  None.

ITEM 13:  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

         (a)      Transactions Between Merrill Lynch and the Partnership
                  ------------------------------------------------------

                  All of the service providers to the Partnership, other than
the Advisors, are affiliates of Merrill Lynch. Merrill Lynch negotiated with the
Advisors over the level of its advisory fees and Profit Share. However, none of
the fees paid by the Partnership to any Merrill Lynch party were negotiated, and
they are higher than would have been obtained in arm-length bargaining.

                  The Partnership pays Merrill Lynch substantial Brokerage
Commissions and Administrative Fees as well as bid-ask spreads on forward
currency trades. The Partnership also pays MLF interest on short-term loans
extended by MLF to cover losses on foreign currency positions.

                  Within the Merrill Lynch organization, MLIP is the direct
beneficiary of the revenues received by different Merrill Lynch entities from
the Partnership. MLIP controls the management of the Partnership and serves as
its promoter. Although MLIP has not sold any assets, directly or indirectly, to
the Partnership, MLIP makes substantial profits from the Partnership due to the
foregoing revenues.

                  No loans have been, are or will be outstanding between MLIP or
any of its principals and the Partnership.

                  MLIP pays substantial selling commissions and trailing
commissions to MLPF&S for distributing the Units. MLIP is ultimately paid back
for these expenditures from the revenues it receives from the Partnership.


                                      -18-
<PAGE>

         (b)      Certain Business Relationships:
                  ------------------------------

                  MLF, an affiliate of MLIP, acts as the principal commodity
broker for the Partnership.

                  In 2000, the Partnership, through MM LLC, expensed the
following fees: (i) Brokerage Commissions of $1,124,411 to MLF, which
included approximately $154,189 in consulting fees earned by the Advisors;
and (ii) Administrative Fees of $32,126 to MLIP. In addition, MLIP and its
affiliates may have derived certain economic benefits from possession of the
Partnership's assets, as well as from foreign exchange and EFP trading.

                  See Item 1(c), "Narrative Description of Business -- Charges"
and "Description of Current Charges" for a discussion of other business dealings
between MLIP affiliates and the Partnership.


         (c)      Indebtedness of Management:
                  --------------------------

                  The Partnership is prohibited from making any loans, to
management or otherwise.

         (d)      Transactions with Promoters:
                  ---------------------------

                  Not applicable.


                                      -19-
<PAGE>

                                     PART IV

ITEM 14:  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         (a)1.    Financial Statements:                                                               Page
                  --------------------                                                                ----
                  <S>                                                                                 <C>

                  Independent Auditors' Report                                                           1

                  Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2000 and 1999                     2

                  For the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
                           Statements of Operations                                                      3
                           Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital                                    4

                  Notes to Financial Statements                                                       5-11

</TABLE>

         (a)2.    Financial Statement Schedules:
                  -----------------------------

                  Financial statement schedules not included in this Form 10-K
                  have been omitted for the reason that they are not required
                  or are not applicable or that equivalent information has been
                  included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

         (a)3.    Exhibits:
                  --------

                  The following exhibits are incorporated by reference or are
                  filed herewith to this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Designation                Description
-----------                -----------
<S>                        <C>

3.01(i)                    Amended and Restated  Certificate of Limited Partnership of the
                           Registrant,  dated July 27, 1995.

EXHIBIT 3.01(i):           Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.01(d)
                           contained in the Registrant's report on Form 10-Q for
                           the Quarter Ended June 30, 1995.

3.01(ii)                   Limited Partnership Agreement of the Partnership.

EXHIBIT 3.01(ii):          Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 3.01(a)
                           contained in Amendment No. 1 (as Exhibit A) to the
                           Registration Statement (File No. 33-34432) filed on
                           May 25, 1990 on Form S-1 under the Securities Act of 1933
                           (the "Registrant's Registration Statement").

10.01(o)                   Form of Advisory Agreement between the Partnership,  Merrill Lynch
                           Investment Partners Inc., Merrill Lynch Futures Inc. and
                           each Advisor.

EXHIBIT 10.01(o):          Is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.01(o)
                           contained in the Registrant's report on Form 10-Q for the
                           Quarter Ended June 30, 1995.

10.02(a)                   Form of Consulting  Agreement  between each Advisor of the
                           Partnership and Merrill Lynch Futures Inc.


                                      - 20-
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.02(a):          Is incorporated  herein by reference from Exhibit  10.02(a)
                           contained in the Registrant's Registration Statement.

10.03(a)                   Form of Customer Agreement between the Partnership and Merrill
                           Lynch Futures Inc.

EXHIBIT 10.03(a):          Is  incorporated  herein by reference from Exhibit  10.03(a) contained in the  Registrant's
                           Registration Statement.

10.05                      Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Guarantee.

EXHIBIT 10.05:             Is  incorporated  herein by  reference  from  Exhibit 10.05  contained  in the  Registrant's
                           Registration Statement.

10.06                      Foreign Exchange Desk Service  Agreement among Merrill Lynch Investment Bank,  Merrill Lynch
                           Investment Partners Inc., Merrill Lynch Futures Inc. and the Partnership.

EXHIBIT 10.06:             Is incorporated herein by reference from
                           Exhibit 10.06 contained in the Registrant's report on
                           Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.

10.07(a)                   Form of Advisory and Consulting  Agreement Amendment among Merrill Lynch Investment Partners
                           Inc., each Advisor, the Partnership and Merrill Lynch Futures Inc.

EXHIBIT 10.07(a):          Is incorporated herein by reference from
                           Exhibit 10.07(a) contained in the Registrant's report
                           on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.

10.07(b)                   Form of Amendment to the Customer Agreement among the Partnership and MLF.

EXHIBIT 10.07(b):          Is incorporated herein by reference from
                           Exhibit 10.07(b) contained in the Registrant's report
                           on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.

13.01                      2000 Annual Report and Independent Auditors' Report.

EXHIBIT 13.01:             Is filed herewith.

13.01(a)                   2000 Annual Report and Independent Auditors' Report for the following  Trading  Limited
                           Liability Company sponsored by Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc.:
                           ML Multi-Manager Portfolio LLC

EXHIBIT 13.01(a):          Is filed herewith.

28.01                      Prospectus of the Partnership dated June 1, 1990.

EXHIBIT 28.01:             Is incorporated by reference as filed with the
                           Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule
                           424 under the Securities Act of 1933 (File No. 33-34432) filed on June 7, 1990.


         (b)      REPORT ON FORM 8-K:

                  No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the fourth quarter of 2000.
</TABLE>

                                     -21-


<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES


         Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                            THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND (SM) VI L.P.
                            (SAFETY OF EQUITY CAPITAL; TARGETING OVERALL RETURN)

                            By:  MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT PARTNERS INC.
                                   General Partner

                            By: /S/ RONALD S. ROSENBERG
                                -----------------------
                                    Ronald S. Rosenberg
                                    Chairman and Director
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)


         Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed on March 30, 2001 by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Signature                           Title                                                              Date
---------                           -----                                                              ----
<S>                                 <C>                                                          <C>
/s/Ronald S. Rosenberg              Chairman and Director                                        March 30, 2001
----------------------              (Principal Executive Officer)
Ronald S. Rosenberg

/s/Fabio P. Savodelli               President and Director                                       March 30, 2001
---------------------
Fabio P. Savodelli

/s/Steven B. Olgin                  Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer                 March 30, 2001
------------------                  and Director
Steven B. Olgin

/s/Michael L. Pungello              Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer        March 30, 2001
----------------------              (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Michael L. Pungello

</TABLE>

(Being the principal executive officer, the principal financial and accounting
officer and a majority of the directors of Merrill Lynch Investment Partners
Inc.)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>                                  <C>                                                           <C>
MERRILL LYNCH INVESTMENT             General Partner of Registrant                                 March 30, 2001
   PARTNERS INC.

By/s/ Ronald S. Rosenberg
  -----------------------
      Ronald S. Rosenberg
</TABLE>


                                     -22-


<PAGE>



                      THE SECTOR STRATEGY FUND (SM) VI L.P.

                                 2000 FORM 10-K

                                INDEX TO EXHIBITS


                                    Exhibit
                                    -------


Exhibit 13.01        2000 Annual Report and Independent Auditors' Report

Exhibit 13.01(a)     2000 Annual Report and Independent Auditors' Report
                     for the following Trading Limited Liability Company
                     sponsored by Merrill Lynch Investment Partners Inc.:
                     ML Multi Manager Portfolio LLC.










                                     -23-