Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 14, 1997 / Notices 53343

conduct would justify revocation of its

DEA Certificate of Registration.’’ Judge

Randall further concluded that

Respondent did not present any

mitigating or rehabilitating evidence as

it relates to its dispensing practices.

Therefore, Judge Randall recommended

that Respondent’s DEA Certificate of

Registration be revoked. Judge Randall

further recommended however, that

‘‘[s]ubsequently, should the Respondent

provide any evidence of proposed

procedural changes for the dispensing of

controlled substances in a new

application for a Certificate of

Registration, and should such evidence

be persuasive, then I would concur with

a favorable decision concerning that

subsequent application.’’

The Acting Deputy Administrator

agrees with the Administrative Law

Judge that the Government has met its

burden of proof and that Respondent’s

registration should be revoked.

However, the Acting Deputy

Administrator does not adopt Judge

Randall’s recommendation that

favorable consideration will be given to

a new application for registration

should Respondent present persuasive

evidence of procedural changes

regarding the dispensing of controlled

substances. A change in procedures, in

and of itself, might not justify granting

Respondent a new registration, since

Mr. Grimes has failed to acknowledge

that he and his pharmacy have done

anything improper. An unexplained

shortage of $80,000 dosage units and the

unauthorized dispensation of over

25,000 dosage units of controlled

substances are not merely minor

technical violations. The egregious

nature of the violations in this matter

demonstrate that Respondent has failed

miserably in its responsibility as a DEA

registrant to protect against the

diversion of controlled substances from

the legitimate chain of distribution.

Respondent is certainly free to apply for

a new DEA Certificate of Registration.

Any such application will be evaluated

in light of all of the relevant

circumstances in existence at that time

to determine whether to grant the

application.

Accordingly, the Acting Deputy

Administrator of the Drug Enforcement

Administration, pursuant to the

authority vested in him by 21 U.S.C. 823

and 824 and 28 CFR 0.100(b) and 0.104,

hereby orders that DEA Certificate

AC5430450, issued to City Drug

Company, be, and it hereby is, revoked.

The Acting Deputy Administrator

further order that any pending

applications for renewal of such

registration, be, and they hereby are,

denied. This order is effective

November 13, 1997.

Dated: October 7, 1997.

James S. Milford,

Acting Deputy Administrator.

[FR Doc. 97–27144 Filed 10–10–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–09–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

Manufacturer of Controlled

Substances; Notice of Registration

By notice dated February 28, 1997,

and published in the Federal Register

on March 28, 1997, (62 FR 14944),

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical

Partners, HC02 State Road 933, KMO.1

Makey Ward, HC–02 Box 19250,

Gurabo, Puerto Rico 00778–9629, made

application by renewal to the Drug

Enforcement Administration (DEA) to

be registered as a bulk manufacturer of

Sufentanil (9740), a basic class of

controlled substance listed in Schedule

II.

DEA has considered the factors in

Title 21, United States Code, Section

823(a) and determined that the

registration of Johnson & Johnson

Pharmaceutical to manufacturer

sufentanil is consistent with the public

interest at this time. Therefore, pursuant

to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and

0.104, the Deputy Assistant

Administrator, Office of Diversion

Control, hereby orders that the

application submitted by the above firm

for registration as a bulk manufacturer

of the basic class of controlled substance

listed above is granted.

Dated: October 1, 1997.

John H. King,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–27143 Filed 10–10–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–09–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary

Privacy Act of 1974; Publication of a

New System of Records; Amendments

To Existing Systems of Records

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Labor.

ACTION: Notice of a new system of

records; amendments to existing

systems of records.

SUMMARY: The Privacy Act of 1974

requires that each agency publish notice

of all of the systems of records that it

maintains. This document adds a new

system of records to this Department’s

current systems of records. With the

addition of this new system of records,

the Department will be maintaining 145

systems of records. This document also

proposes to revise the Routine Uses

Category for two of the Department’s

existing systems of records. The

proposed routine uses provide

additional protection to the privacy

interests of the participants in the

surveys which are being conducted by

the managers of the relevant systems of

records. Finally, various administrative

(non-substantive) changes are being

made to three of the existing systems of

records. Two of the three systems being

amended administratively, are the same

systems which are the subject of the

proposed revised Routine Uses

Category.

DATES: Persons wishing to comment on

this new system of records and on the

proposed new Routine Uses may do so

by November 24, 1997.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Unless there is a further

notice in the Federal Register, the new

system of records, and the proposed

amendments to the two existing

systems, DOL/BLS–13, and DOL/BLS–

17, will become effective on December

8, 1997. The remaining amendments,

which relate to DOL/OAW–1, DOL/

BLS–13 and DOL/BLS–17, are

administrative (non-substantive), and

therefore, will become effective on

October 14, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be

mailed or delivered to Robert A.

Shapiro, Associate Solicitor, Division of

Legislation and Legal Counsel, 200

Constitution Avenue, NW., Room

N–2428, Washington, DC 20210.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Miriam McD. Miller, Counsel for

Administrative Law, Office of the

Solicitor, Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Avenue, NW, Room

N–2428, Washington, DC 20210,

telephone (202) 219–8188.
53344 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 14, 1997 / Notices

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant

to section three of the Privacy Act of

1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)), hereinafter

referred to as the Act, the Department

hereby publishes notice of a new system

of records currently maintained

pursuant to the Act. This document

supplements this Department’s last

publication in full of all of its Privacy

Act systems of records. The document

also proposes to amend the Routine

Uses Category for two of the

Department’s existing systems of

records. On September 23, 1993, in

Volume 58 at page 49548 of the Federal

Register, we published a notice

containing 138 systems of records

which were maintained under the Act.

Subsequent publications of new systems

were made on April 15, 1994 (59 FR

18156) (two new systems); on May 10,

1995 (60 FR 24897) (one new system);

and on June 15, 1995 (60 FR 31495) (one

new system); and on April 7, 1997 (62

FR 16610) (one new system). The new

system published herein will increase

the total number of systems to 145.

1. The new system published herein

is entitled DOL/OSBP–1, Office of Small

Business Programs, Small Entity Inquiry

and Complaint Tracking System. It is a

non-exempt system of records. The new

system is being established in order to

comply with the statutory requirements

of the Small Business Regulatory

Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996

(SBREFA). The system will enable the

Department to report to the Small

Business Administration (SBA), and to

the Congress, on how it assists small

entities in complying with Departmental

regulations.

2. The Department also hereby

proposes to amend two existing systems

of records, DOL/BLS–13, and DOL/BLS–

17, which are each research surveys of

youth, so that a revised Routine Uses

Category can be substituted into these

two systems of records. The revised

Routine Uses Category will provide

additional protection to the privacy

interests of the participants in the

surveys which are being conducted by

the managers of each of these systems of

records. This additional privacy

protection, for the participants in the

survey, is achieved by making several of

the Universal Routine Uses, contained

within the General Prefatory Statement,

inapplicable to these two systems of

records. DOL/BLS–13 was last

published on September 23, 1993 at 58

FR 49592, and DOL/BLS–17 was last

published on April 7, 1997 at 62 FR

16612.

3. This document makes various

administrative (non-substantive)

changes to the above discussed systems,

DOL/BLS–13 and DOL/BLS–17. Since

these administrative amendments are

non-substantive, public comment is not

required. These changes merely refine

each of the systems.

4. Finally, the Department is making

an administrative (non-substantive)

amendment to DOL/OAW–1 at this time

by transferring this system of records

into the Employment Standards

Administration, and by renaming it as

DOL/ESA–45. This amendment is

necessary because the Office of the

American Workplace no longer exists as

a component of the Department of

Labor. The Office of Labor-Management

Standards which created and maintains

this system has been transferred into the

the Employment Standards

Administration.

Universal Routine Use

In its September 23, 1993 publication,

the Department gave notice of eleven

paragraphs containing routine uses

which apply to all of its systems of

records, except for DOL/OASAM–5 and

DOL/OASAM–7. These eleven

paragraphs were presented in the

General Prefatory Statement for that

document, and it appeared at pages

49554–49555 of Volume 58 of the

Federal Register. Those eleven

paragraphs were republished in an April

15, 1994 document in order to correct

grammatical mistakes in the September

23, 1993 version. In the May 10, 1995,

June 15, 1995 and April 7, 1997

publications, the General Prefatory

Statement was republished as a

convenience to the reader of the

document. We are again republishing

the General Prefatory Statement as a

convenience to the reader. At this time

we are making a syntactical change to

paragraph 10.

The public, the Office of Management

and Budget (OMB), and the Congress are

invited to submit written comments on

the proposed amendment in this

document. A report on the new system,

and on the proposed revisions to DOL/

BLS–13 and DOL/BLS–17, has been

provided to OMB and to the Congress as

required by OMB Circular A–130,

Revised, and 5 U.S.C. 552a(r). The

administrative (non-substantive)

amendments do not have to be

submitted for comment to OMB and to

the Congress.

General Prefatory Statement

The following routine uses apply to

and are incorporated by reference into

each system of records published below

unless the text of a particular notice of

a system of records indicates otherwise.

These routine uses do not apply to DOL/

OASAM–5, Rehabilitation and

Counseling File, nor to DOL/OASAM–7,

Employee Medical Records.

1. It shall be a routine use of the

records in this system of records to

disclose them to the Department of

Justice when: (a) The agency or any

component thereof; or (b) any employee

of the agency in his or her official

capacity where the Department of

Justice has agreed to represent the

employee; or (c) the United States

Government, is a party to litigation or

has an interest in such litigation, and by

careful review, the agency determines

that the records are both relevant and

necessary to the litigation and the use of

such records by the Department of

Justice is therefore deemed by the

agency to be for a purpose that is

compatible with the purpose for which

the agency collected the records.

2. It shall be a routine use of the

records in this system of records to

disclose them in a proceeding before a

court or adjudicative body, when: (a)

The agency or any component thereof;

or (b) any employee of the agency in his

or her official capacity; or (c) any

employee of the agency in his or her

individual capacity where the agency

has agreed to represent the employee; or

(d) the United States Government, is a

party to litigation or has an interest in

such litigation, and by careful review,

the agency determines that the records

are both relevant and necessary to the

litigation and the use of such records is

therefore deemed by the agency to be for

a purpose that is compatible with the

purpose for which the agency collected

the records.

3. When a record on its face, or in

conjunction with other records,

indicates a violation or potential

violation of law, whether civil, criminal

or regulatory in nature, and whether

arising by general statute or particular

program statute, or by regulation, rule,

or order issued pursuant thereto,

disclosure may be made to the

appropriate agency, whether Federal,

foreign, State, local, or tribal, or other

public authority responsible for

enforcing, investigating or prosecuting

such violation or charged with enforcing

or implementing the statute, or rule,

regulation, or order issued pursuant

thereto, if the information disclosed is

relevant to any enforcement, regulatory,

investigative or prosecutive

responsibility of the receiving entity,

and by careful review, the agency

determines that the records are both

relevant and necessary to the litigation

and the use of such records is therefore

deemed by the agency to be for a

purpose that is compatible with the

purpose for which the agency collected

the records.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 14, 1997 / Notices 53345

4. A record from this system of

records may be disclosed to a Member

of Congress or to a Congressional staff

member in response to an inquiry of the

Congressional office made at the written

request of the constituent about whom

the record is maintained.

5. Records from this system of records

may be disclosed to the National

Archives and Records Administration or

to the General Services Administration

for records management inspections

conducted under 44 U.S.C. 2904 and

2906.

6. Disclosure may be made to agency

contractors, or their employees,

consultants, grantees, or their

employees, or volunteers who have been

engaged to assist the agency in the

performance of a contract, service, grant,

cooperative agreement or other activity

related to this system of records and

who need to have access to the records

in order to perform the activity.

Recipients shall be required to comply

with the requirements of the Privacy Act

of 1974, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 552a; see

also 5 U.S.C. 552a(m).

7. The name and current address of an

individual may be disclosed from any

system of records to the parent locator

service of the Department of HHS or to

other authorized persons defined by

Public Law 93–647 for the purpose of

locating a parent who is not paying

required child support.

8. Disclosure may be made to any

source from which information is

requested in the course of a law

enforcement or grievance investigation,

or in the course of an investigation

concerning retention of an employee or

other personnel action, the retention of

a security clearance, the letting of a

contract, the retention of a grant, or the

retention of any other benefit, to the

extent necessary to identify the

individual, inform the source of the

purpose(s) of the request, and identify

the type of information requested.

9. Disclosure may be made to a

Federal, State, local, foreign, or tribal or

other public authority of the fact that

this system of records contains

information relevant to the hiring or

retention of an employee, the granting

or retention of a security clearance, the

letting of a contract, a suspension or

debarment determination or the

issuance or retention of a license, grant,

or other benefit.

10. A record from any system of

records set forth below may be disclosed

to the Office of Management and Budget

in connection with the review of private

relief legislation and the legislative

coordination and clearance process.

11. Disclosure may be made to a debt

collection agency that the United States

has contracted with for collection

services to recover debts owed to the

United States.

I. Publication of a New System of

Records

DOL/OSBP–1

SYSTEM NAME:

Office of Small Business Programs,

Small Entity Inquiry and Complaint

Tracking System.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:

None.

SYSTEM LOCATION:

U.S. Department of Labor, Office of

Small Business Programs, Frances

Perkins Building, 200 Constitution Ave.,

NW, Room C–2318, Washington, DC

20210.

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE

SYSTEM:

Individuals who make oral or written

complaints about, or requests or

inquiries concerning, enforcement

activities under the Small Business

Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of

1996 (SBREFA) of the U.S. Department

of Labor (Department).

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

Records include the name and

address of the individuals making

complaints, requests, or inquiries

concerning enforcement activities of the

Department of Labor, and any other

information under SBREFA necessary to

respond to the complaint or request.

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:

Subtitles A and B of The Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), Pub. L.

104–121, Title II, sec. 213, 110 Stat.

858–859.

PURPOSES:

Section 213 of Title II of Pub. L. 104–

121 requires each agency to establish a

program for providing informal

guidance to small entities regulated by

that agency. Section 213(c) requires the

agency to report to Congress on ‘‘the

scope of the agency’s program, the

number of small entities using the

program, and the achievements of the

program to assist small entity

compliance with agency regulations.’’

The records in this system are

maintained for the purpose of

complying with the above statutory

requirements.

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE

SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND

THE PURPOSE OF SUCH USES:

In addition to those Universal Routine

Uses included in the Department’s

General Prefatory Statement, last

republished in the Federal Register on

April 7, 1997, at 62 FR 16611–16612,

relevant records may be disclosed to the

Small Business Administration (SBA).

The records may be disclosed to the

SBA in response to a referral from the

SBA of a complaint filed against this

Department by a small entity. The above

described referrals are authorized by

Subtitles A and B of The Small Business

Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of

1996.

DISCLOSURE TO CONSUMER REPORTING

AGENCIES:

None.

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

STORAGE:

Records are maintained electronically.

RETRIEVABILITY:

Name or Control Number.

SAFEGUARDS:

Accessed by authorized personnel

only. Passwords are used for the data,

which is electronically stored.

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:

Five years.

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:

Director, Office of Small Business

Programs, U.S, Department of Labor,

200 Constitution Ave., NW, Room C–

2318, Washington, DC 20210.

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES:

Mail all inquiries or present in writing

to System Manager at above address.

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:

A request for access shall be

addressed to the system manager at the

address listed above. Individuals must

furnish the following information for

their records to be located and

identified:

a. Name.

b. Approximate date of the creation of

the file.

c. Individuals requesting access must

also comply with the Privacy Act

regulations regarding the verification of

identity at 29 CFR 70a.70.

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:

A petition for amendment shall be

addressed to the system manager and

must meet the requirements of 29 CFR

70a.7.

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:

Individuals who make complaints,

requests, other inquiries concerning

enforcement activities of the

Department of Labor.
53346 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 14, 1997 / Notices

SYSTEMS EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS

OF THE ACT:

None.

II. Publication of a Proposed

Amendment

DOL/BLS–13, National Longitudinal

Survey of Youth (NLSY) Database, is

amended by revising the category for

Routine Uses to read as set forth below.

For the convenience of the reader, the

entire system is being republished in

full. At this time, the various

administrative (non-substantive)

amendments are being published as set

forth below.

DOL/BLS–13

SYSTEM NAME:

National Longitudinal Survey of

Youth 1979 (NLSY79) Database.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:

None.

SYSTEM LOCATION:

National Opinion Research Center

(NORC), University of Chicago, 1155 E.

60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637.

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE

SYSTEM:

A random sample of the general

population who were ages 14–21 on

January 1, 1979, with over

representation of blacks, Hispanics,

poor whites, and persons serving in the

military.

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

Records include name, Social

Security Number, control number,

marital history, education, military

service, Armed Services Vocational

Aptitude Battery scores, job history,

unemployment history, training history,

fertility/family planning, child health

history, alcohol use, drug use, reported

police contacts, assets and income,

school records, Government assistance

program participation, childhood

residence, child development outcomes,

history of mother/child relationship,

time use, time spent on childcare and

household chores, and immigration

history.

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:

29 U.S.C. 2.

PURPOSE(S):

To serve a variety of policy-related

research interests concerning the labor

market problems of youth. Data are used

for studies such as: Diffusion of useful

information on labor, examination of

employment and training programs,

understanding labor markets, guiding

military manpower and measuring the

effect of military service, analysis of

social indicators and measuring

maternal and child inputs and

outcomes.

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE

SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND

THE PURPOSE OF SUCH USES:

The Bureau of Labor Statistics may

release records to the National Opinion

Research Center (NORC) and/or Ohio

State University to compile data which

are not individually identifiable for use

by the general public and other federal

agencies who are conducting labor force

research. Under written agreements to

protect the confidentiality and security

of identifying information, BLS provides

potentially-identifying geographic

information to researchers to conduct

specific research projects which further

the mission and functions of BLS. The

records also may be disclosed where

required by law. Items 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10,

and 11 listed in the General Prefatory

Statement to this document are not

applicable to this system of records.

DISCLOSURE TO CONSUMER REPORTING

AGENCIES:

None.

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

STORAGE:

Files are stored electronically and on

paper.

RETRIEVABILITY:

Name or Control Number.

SAFEGUARDS:

Access by authorized personnel only.

Computer security safeguards are used

for electronically stored data and locked

locations for paper files.

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:

Indefinite.

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:

Program Manager, NLS Youth 1979

Cohort Study, Office of Employment

and Unemployment Statistics, Room

4945, Postal Square Building, 2

Massachusetts Ave., NE, Washington,

DC 20212.

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:

Mail, or present in writing, all

inquiries to the System Manager at the

above address.

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:

As in notification procedure.

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:

As in notification procedure.

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:

From individuals concerned.

SYSTEMS EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS

OF THE ACT:

None.

III. Publication of a Second Proposed

Amendment

DOL/BLS–17, National Longitudinal

Survey of Youth 1996 (NLSY96)

Database, is amended by revising the

category for Routine Uses to read as set

forth below. For the convenience of the

reader, the entire system is being

republished in full. At this time, the

various administrative (non-substantive)

amendments are being published as set

forth below.

DOL/BLS–17

SYSTEM NAME:

National Longitudinal Survey of

Youth 1997 (NLSY97) Database.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION:

None.

SYSTEM LOCATION:

National Opinion Research Center

(NORC), University of Chicago, 1155 E.

60th Street, Chicago, IL 60637.

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE

SYSTEM:

A random sample of the general

population who were ages 12–16 on

December 31, 1995 with over

representation of disabled students.

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

Records include name, Social

Security Number, control number,

marital history, education, job history,

unemployment history, military service,

training history, fertility/family

planning, child health history, alcohol

use, drug use, reported police contacts,

anti-social behavior, assets and income,

school records, Government assistance

program participation, childhood

residence, child development outcomes,

expectations, history of mother/child

relationship, time use, time spent on

child care, immigration history, and

Armed Services Vocational Aptitude

Battery scores.

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:

29 U.S.C. 2.

PURPOSE(S):

To serve a variety of policy-related

research interests concerning the

school-to-work transition and the labor

market problems of youth. Data are used

for studies such as: Diffusion of useful

information on labor, examination of

employment and training programs,

understanding labor markets, analysis of

social indicators, measuring maternal

and child inputs and outcomes,

norming the Department of Defense
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 14, 1997 / Notices 53347

Armed Services Vocational Aptitude

Battery in its computerized adaptive

form, and creation of norms for the

Department of Defense Interest Measure.

ROUTINE USES OF RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE

SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS AND

THE PURPOSE OF SUCH USES:

The Bureau of Labor Statistics may

release records to the National Research

Center (NORC) and/or Ohio State

University to compile data which are

not individually identifiable for use by

the general public and federal agencies

who are conducting labor force research.

Under written agreements to protect the

confidentiality and security of

identifying information, BLS provides

potentially-identifying geographic

information to researchers to conduct

specific research projects which further

the mission and functions of BLS. The

records also may be disclosed where

required by law. Items 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10,

and 11 listed in the General Prefatory

Statement to this document are not

applicable to this system of records.

DISCLOSURE TO CONSUMER REPORTING

AGENCIES:

None.

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:

STORAGE:

Files are stored electronically and on

paper.

RETRIEVABILITY:

Name or Control Number.

SAFEGUARDS:

Access by authorized personnel only.

Computer security safeguards are used

for electronically stored data, and

locked locations for paper files.

RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:

Indefinite.

SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:

Program Manager, NLS Youth 1996

Cohort Study, Office of Employment

and Unemployment Statistics, Room

4945, Postal Square Building, 2

Massachusetts Ave., NE., Washington,

DC 20212.

NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:

Mail, or present in writing, all

inquiries to the System Manager at the

above address.

RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:

As in notification procedure.

CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:

As in notification procedure.

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:

From individuals concerned.

SYSTEMS EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS

OF THE ACT:

None.

IV. Publication of an Administrative

(Non-Substantive)

DOL/OAW–1, entitled Investigative

Files, a system of records maintained by

the Office of Labor-Management

Standards, is amended by transferring it

to the Employment Standards

Administrative and by revising its name

to read as follows:

DOL/ESA–45

SYSTEM NAME:

Investigative Files of the Office of

Labor-Management Standards.

* * * * *

Signed at Washington, DC this 2nd day of

October, 1997.

Alexis M. Herman,

Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 97–27080 Filed 10–10–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–23–P

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of September, 1997.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–33,553; Brainard Rivet Co.,

Girard, OH

TA–W–33,735; Monarch Machine Tool

Co., Sidney, OH

TA–W–33,680; Tubafor Mill, Inc., Crane

Creek Div., Amanda Park, WA

TA–W–33,703; Willamette Industries,

Albany, OR

TA–W–33,719; Liberty Fabrics, North

Bergen, NJ

TA–W–33,749; U.S. Can Co., Racine, WI

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

TA–W–33,778; Oneita Industries,

Cullman, AL

TA–W–33,777; U.S. Ring Binder Corp.,

New Bedford, MA

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–33,799; West Virginia Shoe Co.,

Marlinton, WV

TA–W–33,774; Noma Appliance and

Electronics, Noma, AZ

The investigation revealed that

criteria (2) has not been met. Sales or

production did not decline during the

relevant period as required for

certification.

TA–W–33,493; Honeywell, Inc.,

Arlington Heights Operation,

Arlington Heights, IL

All production at the subject plant

was transferred to other U.S. located

plants. Sales of these products as

reported by the company, have not

declined.

TA–W–33,757; International Titanium

Corp., Cedartown, GA

TA–W–33,737; Klein Bicycle Corp.,

Chehalis, WA

TA–W–33,715; Brandon Apparel Group,

Inc., Columbus, WI

TA–W–33,619; Trinity Industries Ladish

Co., Russellville, AR

TA–W–33,753; Borg Warner Automotive,

Inc., Blytheville, AR

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name & location for each determination