alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
110 STAT. 1414 PUBLIC LAW 104–162—JULY 18, 1996

Public Law 104–162

104th Congress

An Act

To authorize the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (most-favored-nation

treatment) to the products of Bulgaria.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS AND SUPPLEMENTAL ACTION.

(a) CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that Bulgaria—

(1) has received most-favored-nation treatment since 1991

and has been found to be in full compliance with the freedom

of emigration requirements under title IV of the Trade Act

of 1974 since 1993;

(2) has reversed many years of Communist dictatorship

and instituted a constitutional republic ruled by a democratically elected government as well as basic market-oriented

reforms, including privatization;

(3) is in the process of acceding to the General Agreement

on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the World Trade Organization

(WTO), and extension of unconditional most-favored-nation

treatment would enable the United States to avail itself of

all rights under the GATT and the WTO with respect to Bulgaria; and

(4) has demonstrated a strong desire to build friendly relationships and to cooperate fully with the United States on

trade matters.

(b) SUPPLEMENTAL ACTION.—The Congress notes that the

United States Trade Representative intends to negotiate with Bulgaria in order to preserve the commitments of that country under

the bilateral commercial agreement in effect between that country

and the United States that are consistent with the GATT and

the WTO.

19 USC 2434

note.

July 18, 1996

[H.R. 2853]
PUBLIC LAW 104–162—JULY 18, 1996 110 STAT. 1415

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2853:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–466 (Comm. on Ways and Means).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 104–265 (Comm. on Finance).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):

Mar. 5, considered and passed House.

June 28, considered and passed Senate.

WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 32 (1996):

July 18, Presidential statement.

Æ

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV OF THE TRADE

ACT OF 1974 TO BULGARIA.

(a) PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATIONS AND EXTENSION OF NONDISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT.—Notwithstanding any provision of

title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.), the

President may—

(1) determine that such title should no longer apply to

Bulgaria; and

(2) after making a determination under paragraph (1) with

respect to Bulgaria, proclaim the extension of nondiscriminatory

treatment (most-favored-nation treatment) to the products of

that country.

(b) TERMINATION OF APPLICATION OF TITLE IV.—On and after

the effective date of the extension under subsection (a)(2) of nondiscriminatory treatment to the products of Bulgaria, title IV of

the Trade Act of 1974 shall cease to apply to that country.

Approved July 18, 1996.

19 USC 2434

note.
#### Shirley S. MERRIFIELD, Appellant, v. Albert L. MERRIFIELD, Appellee.

No. 70-14.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 25, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; John H. Moore, II, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Merle H. KELLER, Joe Taylor and Merle H. Keller, d/b/a Bet-R-Maid Cabinet Company and Bet-R-Maid Cabinet Company, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. Mable C. GEORGE, Appellee.

No. 69-266.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 17, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Nicklebys.com,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  March  31,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'),  I, Scott
Thornock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Scott Thornock
---------------------------
Scott Thornock
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of Key Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John J. Ehren, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/  John J. Ehren


John J. Ehren


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


December 10, 2010
#### Earl Roscoe LEE, Jr., d/b/a Earl R. Lee Trucking Company, Appellant, v. Mary Lucille STONE, as Administratrix of the Estate of Bobby Ray Stone, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 68-371.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Aug. 4, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Dolla M. GOSSETT, Appellant, v. George Washington BROWN, Appellee.

No. 69-512.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 13, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3222 

To ensure the security of office space rented by Senators, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2023 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 

considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To ensure the security of office space rented by Senators, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SECURITY OF OFFICE SPACE RENTED BY SEN4 ATORS. 

5 Section 3 of the Legislative Branch Appropriation 

6 Act, 1975 (2 U.S.C. 6317) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (b)— 

8 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) 

9 through (12) as subparagraphs (A) through 

10 (L), respectively; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3222 CPS

1 (B) by striking ‘‘The aggregate’’ and in2 serting ‘‘(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the ag3 gregate’’; and 

4 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(2) The aggregate square feet of office space for 

6 purposes of paragraph (1) shall not include any portion 

7 of the office space used for security or safety enhance8 ments that are— 

9 ‘‘(A) of a kind authorized by the Committee on 

10 Rules and Administration of the Senate, which shall 

11 include an information technology security closet 

12 and a secure lobby or reception area; and 

13 ‘‘(B) approved by the Sergeant at Arms and 

14 Doorkeeper of the Senate.’’; and 

15 (2) in subsection (c)(1)— 

16 (A) by striking ‘‘The maximum’’ and in17 serting ‘‘(A) Subject to subparagraph (B), the 

18 maximum’’; and 

19 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

20 ‘‘(B) The portion of the cost of a rental described 

21 in subparagraph (A) that is attributable to building secu22 rity and safety measures shall not be included in deter23 mining the annual rate paid for the rental for purposes 

24 of subparagraph (A) if— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3222 CPS

1 ‘‘(i) the costs are for building security and safe2 ty measures— 

3 ‘‘(I) of a kind authorized by the Committee 

4 on Rules and Administration of the Senate, 

5 which shall include guard services, access con6 trol, and facility monitoring; and 

7 ‘‘(II) approved by the Sergeant at Arms 

8 and Doorkeeper of the Senate; and 

9 ‘‘(ii) such costs are itemized separately in a 

10 manner approved by the Sergeant at Arms and 

11 Doorkeeper of the Senate.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
#### Earl R. LITTLE, Appellant, v. Hazel M. LITTLE, Appellee.

No. 77-609.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 19, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 9, 1977.

Silver S. Squarcia, Miami, for appellant,

David M. Krause, Miami, and Neil P. Linden, North Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant husband appeals an order denying his motion to dismiss his wife’s *1202petition for dissolution of marriage pursuant to his motion claiming reconciliation.1 Upon review of the record, the denial of the husband’s motion is affirmed upon the basis of the rule stated in *Busot v. Busot,*338 So.2d 1332, 1334 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).

A second order appealed from is an order adjudging respondent in contempt for his failure to comply with orders of the court of October 17, 1975, April 30, 1976, and May 12,1976, all of which required that the respondent vacate the marital domicile of the parties. The finding of the trial judge is supported by clear evidence in the record that the husband has willfully failed to comply with the trial court’s order even though given every opportunity to do so. See *Faircloth v. Faircloth,*339 So.2d 650 (Fla.1976).

The orders appealed from are affirmed.

1

. Previous appearances in this court of this litigation are reported at *Little v. Little,*325 So.2d 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *Little v. Little,*336 So.2d 622 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT Sep. 12, 2012 Report Request ID: 1018567 Report Code: AMP430

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID:KHO

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date 06 06 101

115 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS Parameter Classification Parameter Method Duration CRITERIA 88101

SELECTED OPTIONS

OZONE EVALUATION AGENCY ROLE MERGE PDF FILES Option Type Option Value SEASONAL-HOURLY REPORTING YES SORT ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Order Column

EPA_REGION STATE_CODE MONITOR_TYPE COUNTY_CODE SITE_ID PARAMETER_CODE POC GLOBAL DATES

2011 Start Date End Date 2011 01 12 Tribal CodeSep. 12, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 1 of 3 MONITORS NOT REPORTINGSep. 12, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 2 of 3 DATE RANGE: REGION:(09) SAN FRANCISCO

California MONITOR TYPE: California Air Resources Board SLAMS JAN. 01, 2011 DEC. 31, 2011

THRU

SITE ID CITY ADDRESS PARAMETER POCDURATION METHOD ------------------------------- OBSERVATIONS ------------------------------- NUMBER / PERCENT
06-101-0003 88101PM2.5 - Local Conditions 1 7 Yuba City 773 ALMOND ST, YUBA CITY 118 22 71% 22

79% 27 87% 22 73% 26 84% 27 90% 29

94% 30 97% 28 93% 25

81% 30 100% 30

97% 318

87% MONITORS REPORTING

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR STATE: REP ORG:Sep. 12, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 3 of 3 DATE RANGE: REGION:(09) SAN FRANCISCO

California

MONITOR TYPE:

California Air Resources Board SLAMS JAN. 01, 2011 DEC. 31, 2011

THRU

PARAMETER ACTIVE MONITORS # NOT REPORTING # MONITORS > 75% MONITORS AVG COMPLETENESS 88101 PM2.5 - Local Conditions 1 0 1 87.0% 1 0 1 87.0% 1 0 1 87.0% 1 0 1 87.0% 1 0 1 87.0% 1 0 1 87.0% California Air Resources Board California REGION SUMMARY:(09) SAN FRANCISCO REPORT SUMMARY: MT SUMMARY:SLAMS REPORT SUMMARY

STATE:

STATE SUMMARY: REP ORG:

RO SUMMARY:
#### Marcus Augustus SUTHERLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-204.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 8, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
23.1
 
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Nos.
333-143096, 333-135570, 333-135568, and 333-135567) on Forms S-8 and
Registration Statement (No. 333-130550) on Form S-3 of United Western Bancorp,
Inc. of our reports dated March 6, 2008 relating to our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting,
which appear in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of United Western Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
 
 
 /s/
McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
 
 Denver,
Colorado
 March 6,
2008