Page 1 of 67

FLORIDA

2018 ANNUAL REPORT
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 2 of 67

Table of Contents

Table of Contents.................................................................................................................................................... 2

Disclaimer............................................................................................................................................................... 3

Executive Summary................................................................................................................................................ 4

Introduction............................................................................................................................................................. 5

Program Structure ................................................................................................................................................... 5

Program Administration...................................................................................................................................... 5

Program Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 9

Project Implementation......................................................................................................................................... 19

Funds Programmed ........................................................................................................................................... 19

General Listing of Projects............................................................................................................................... 22

Safety Performance............................................................................................................................................... 36

General Highway Safety Trends....................................................................................................................... 36

Safety Performance Targets.............................................................................................................................. 50

Applicability of Special Rules.......................................................................................................................... 53

Evaluation ............................................................................................................................................................. 56

Program Effectiveness...................................................................................................................................... 56

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements ...................................................................... 57

Year 2016.............................................................................................................................................................. 57

Project Effectiveness......................................................................................................................................... 61

Compliance Assessment ....................................................................................................................................... 62
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 3 of 67

Disclaimer

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence 

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or 

data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section [HSIP], shall not be subject to discovery or 

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for 

damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or other data.” 

23 U.S.C. 409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data 

compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of 

potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings, pursuant to sections 

130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement 

project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or 

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for 

damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or data.” 
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 4 of 67

Executive Summary

Florida shares the national traffic safety vision, "Toward Zero Deaths", and formally adopted our own version of 

the national vision with our "Driving Down Fatalities," in 2012. The Florida Department of Transportation 

(FDOT) and its traffic safety partners are committed to eliminating fatalities and serious injuries with the 

understanding that the death of any person is unacceptable. Understanding that zero fatalities cannot be 

reached within 2018, Florida developed data models to forecast the fatalities that are statistically expected to 

occur as we diligently strive to drive down fatalities and serious injuries with an ultimate vision of zero.

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose to achieve 

a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. The Strategic Highway Safety 

Plan (SHSP) is the statewide plan focusing on how to accomplish the vision of eliminating fatalities and serious 

injuries on all public roads. The HSIP is a main component of the SHSP. The SHSP is updated at least every 

five years by FDOT in coordination with statewide, regional, and local traffic safety partners and was last 

updated in 2016.

FDOT received an allocation of about $117 million in HSIP funds during the 2017 state fiscal year from July 1, 

2017 through June 30, 2018 (see Question 23). FDOT used HSIP funds to complete 287 projects (see 

Question 29 ). The Intersection program completed 76 projects with about $30 million (see Question 29). The 

Lane Departure program completed 51 projects with about $38 million (see Question 29). The Pedestrian and 

Bicyclist Safety program completed 90 projects with about $15 million (see Question 29). Multiple programs 

and SHSP emphasis areas including data were addressed by 70 projects with about $33 million (see Question 

29).

Regarding roadway ownership, state-maintained roadways were addressed by 233 projects using about $97 

million in HSIP funds (see Question 29). Local roadways were addressed by 54 projects using about $20 

million (see Question 29). Non-infrastructure such as preliminary engineering, public information or education, 

traffic engineering studies, and transportation statistics was supported with 21 projects using about $7 million 

(see Question 29).

[Source: HSIP Question 23, Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category. 

2018]

[Source: HSIP Question 29, List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period. 2018]

[Source: Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan, 2016]

[Source: Florida Highway Safety Plan, 2018]

[Source: FDOT HSIP Manual, 2018 draft]
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 5 of 67

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of achieving 

a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 148(h) and 23 CFR 

924.15, States are required to report annually on the progress being made to advance HSIP implementation and 

evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the HSIP Reporting Guidance dated December 

29, 2016 and consists of five sections: program structure, progress in implementing highway safety 

improvement projects, progress in achieving safety outcomes and performance targets, effectiveness of the 

improvements and compliance assessment.

Program Structure

Program Administration

Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. 

The general structure for the Florida HSIP is that the program is managed by the Central Office with district 

staff performing project activities such as conducting safety studies, project scoping, public involvement, and 

coordinating with production staff on programming safety projects.

To be eligible for HSIP funds, all safety improvement projects must address a Strategic Highway Safety Plan 

(SHSP) emphasis area, be identified through a data-driven process, and contribute to a reduction in fatalities 

and serious injuries. 

HSIP projects are implemented on state maintained and locally maintained roads. For HSIP projects on locally 

maintained roads an application must be coordinated and concurred with local maintaining agencies. Projects 

should not require additional right-of-way, because of added time to project schedules. The scope of work must 

be well defined prior to programming.

All projects must be able to be constructed, feasible, and cost effective. Field reviews and documentation are 

necessary. Coordination with the District Local Agency Program (LAP) Administrator and the Florida 

Department of Transportation (FDOT) District Safety Engineer is essential throughout the project schedule for 

projects on locally maintained roads. Deviations from the identified scope of work when programmed will need 

to be approved by the FDOT State Safety Office.

Each application for local projects shall include a cover letter signed by the highest elected official of the local 

public agency (county, city or town) that owns or maintains the public road(s) where the proposed 

infrastructure project will be constructed. The application cover letter shall document through the 

representative’s signature that the project has been reviewed (concurrence not required) by the Metropolitan 

Planning Organization (MPO) and the Community Traffic Safety Team (CTST).

The application itself shall contain several elements - (1) project location and description, (2) problem 

description, (3) previous safety improvements, (4) SHSP emphasis area and proposed improvements, (5) 

roadway characteristics, (6) traffic data, (7) crash information, (8) infrastructure impacts, and (9) a summary. 

The summary should include cost(s), schedule, benefit-cost analysis, and net present value (NPV).

[Source: 2017 HSIP Call for Candidate Safety Projects ]
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 6 of 67

Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? 

 Other-Engineering and Operations, State Safety Office

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The following FDOT staff are the primary contacts for the HSIP.

• FDOT State Safety Office and general information:

o Lora Hollingsworth, PE, Chief Safety Officer.

• FDOT HSIP and Safety Engineering: 

o Joseph Santos, PE, Transportation Safety Engineer.

• FDOT Crash Records: 

o Benjamin Jacobs, Crash Records and Research Administrator.

[Source: FDOT HSIP Manual, 2018]

How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? 

Other-Central Office

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

HSIP funds are allocated based on need. The HSIP is a state-administered, federal-aid, highway safety 

program. Funding is apportioned to Florida per FAST Act apportionment formulas. A prioritized list of funded 

and unfunded project needs is maintained by FDOT SSO for present and future fiscal years. Ideally, all 

apportioned funds for a given year should be obligated to the set of projects that yield the highest reduction in 

fatalities and serious injuries in Florida.

[Source: FDOT HSIP Manual, 2018]

Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP.

The FDOT SSO uses Geographic Information Systems (GIS) analysis to support the districts with identifying 

high crash locations on local roads. The SSO also developed several analyses of non-motorist (cyclist or 

pedestrian) involved crashes and intersection crashes. FDOT SSO continues to develop a replacement system 

to provide high crash listings on local roads. Coordination between FDOT District Safety Engineers and the 

Community Traffic Safety Teams identifies other local projects and training opportunities.

[Source: FDOT SSO Staff]

Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) Bureaus, Divisions) 

are involved with HSIP planning.

Traffic Engineering/Safety
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 7 of 67

Design

Planning

Operations

Districts/Regions

Local Aid Programs Office/Division

Governors Highway Safety Office

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Describe coordination with internal partners.

The FDOT SSO is responsible for administering the HSIP statewide. The FDOT SSO issues guidance and 

policy related to HSIP and approves HSIP projects for inclusion in the FDOT Work Program and Statewide 

Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The FDOT SSO is responsible for coordinating the HSIP with 

other roadway safety programs and initiative within FDOT and external partners.

The FDOT Districts are responsible for investigating roadway safety issues within their jurisdictions, evaluating 

options to address those issues, proposing projects for HSIP funding, and implementing those projects. 

Districts also report performance measures to support project evaluation. FDOT Districts also coordinate safety 

improvement efforts with local jurisdictions and assists them in coordinated efforts to reduce fatal and serious 

injuries within the District.

Many FDOT business areas coordinate and support effective administration of the HSIP. These offices and 

business areas include design, operations, utilities, finance, construction, and maintenance. All FDOT offices 

work with FDOT SSO to provide appropriate attention and consideration to all project decisions.

The Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) guides state and local governments in addressing safety, helps 

them coordinate the safety performance measures required for states and MPOs, and addresses federal 

funding through the HSIP. To qualify for HSIP funding, a project must be reflected in the SHSP.

Additionally, the following groups are included in the internal coordination of the HSIP program: Bike and 

Pedestrian Safety Manager, State Safety Office, Safe Routes to School Program, Local Agency Program and 

Work Program Office.

[Source: FDOT HSIP Manual, 2018]

[Source: Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan, 2016]

[Source: FDOT State Safety Office Staff]

Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning.

Regional Planning Organizations (e.g. MPOs, RPOs, COGs)

Governors Highway Safety Office

Local Technical Assistance Program

Local Government Agency 

Tribal Agency

Law Enforcement Agency

Academia/University

FHWA
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 8 of 67

Other-Community Traffic Safety Team (CTST)

Other-FACERS

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Florida’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is aimed at all public roads. Federal Highway Administration 

safety funding can be used for state and local safety projects. In developing the SHSP, efforts were made to 

reach out to local engineers and planners and the state’s 27 MPOs to provide information on ways to improve 

safety. Local roads account for 39 percent of roadway fatalities. That is why coordination and collaboration 

through the SHSP is important as it helps achieve a shared vision for safety.

The SHSP guides state and local governments in addressing safety, helps them coordinate the safety 

performance measures required for states and MPOs, and addresses federal funding through the Highway 

Safety improvement Program (HSIP). To qualify for HSIP funding, a project must be reflected in the SHSP.

Input on safety priorities and activities comes from traffic safety coalitions, advocates, FDOT District Traffic 

Safety Engineers, law enforcement officers and their leadership, emergency responders, judges, Mothers 

Against Drunk Driving (MADD), Students Against Destructive Decisions (SADD), and many other state and 

local agencies. Through the combination of these efforts there are literally thousands of partners that work in 

concert with FDOT toward the goal of a fatality-free roadway system.

[Source: Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan, 2016]

[Source: FDOT FY2019 Highway Safety Plan, 2018]

Describe coordination with external partners.

The goals of Florida's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) are echoed in the Highway Safety Improvement 

Program (HSIP) and Florida’s Highway Safety Plan (HSP) . All three plans cite the goal of reducing traffic 

crashes, fatalities, and serious injuries, with an ultimate target of zero deaths. In developing the SHSP, efforts 

were made to reach out to local engineers and planners and the state’s 27 MPOs to provide information on 

ways to improve safety.

FDOT has the benefit of the expertise and experience of several additional partners throughout the HSP 

planning process. Input on safety priorities and activities comes from traffic safety coalitions, advocates, FDOT 

District Traffic Safety Engineers, law enforcement officers and their leadership, emergency responders, judges, 

Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), Students Against Destructive Decisions (SADD), and many other 

state and local agencies. Florida’s Community Traffic Safety Teams (CTSTs) also provide consistent input into 

the highway safety planning process.

CTSTs are locally based groups of highway safety advocates that are committed to solving traffic safety 

problems through a comprehensive, multi-jurisdictional, multi-disciplinary approach. Members include city, 

county, state, and occasionally Federal agencies, as well as private industry representatives and local citizens. 

Community boundaries are determined by the organizations comprising a CTST: a city, an entire county, a 

portion of a county, multiple counties, or some other jurisdictional arrangement may be the basis for a CTST.

Through the combination of these efforts there are literally thousands of partners that work in concert with 

FDOT toward the goal of a fatality-free roadway system.
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 9 of 67

[Source: Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan, 2016]

[Source: FDOT FY2019 Highway Safety Plan, 2018]

Have any program administration practices used to implement the HSIP changed since the last reporting 

period?

No

Are there any other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to elaborate?

Yes

Describe other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to elaborate. 

The HSIP program is centrally managed for both funding and administration of the program. Each district is 

responsible for submitting projects for funding consideration annually. The SSO reviews district submitted 

projects annually and determines funding based on a need addressed in the Florida Strategic Highway Safety 

Plan, project priorities and the Net Present Value (NPV) of an individual project.

[Source: FDOT Transportation Safety Engineer, 2018]

Program Methodology

Does the State have an HSIP manual or similar that clearly describes HSIP planning, implementation 

and evaluation processes?

Yes

To upload a copy of the State processes, attach files below.

File Name:

FL HSIP Guideline 1991.pdf

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP.

Intersection

Bicycle Safety

Skid Hazard

Pedestrian Safety

Other-Lane Departure

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Program: Bicycle Safety 
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 10 of 67

Date of Program Methodology: 9/1/2007 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

FHWA focused approach to safety

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Traffic Other-Friction Number 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Other-Locations with a high proportion of wet weather crashes are included in the screening process for skid 

hazard project locations. 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Other-Locations are identified through GIS analysis by Central Office or vetted through the districts. District 

submitted projects are evaluated using a Benefit Cost Ratio greater than 1.

Other-Contributing factors such as time of day (75% of fatal pedestrian and bicycle crashes occur during dusk 

or dark hours)

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 11 of 67

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Florida’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Coalition is a diverse group of national, state, and local partners and 

safety advocates that prioritizes and implements the strategies identified in the statewide Pedestrian and 

Bicycle Strategic Safety Plan (PBSSP) to reduce pedestrian and bicycle related fatalities and serious injuries 

as a result of traffic crash involvement on Florida’s roadways.

The PBSSP was finalized in 2013 in response to a pedestrian fatality rate that was nearly double the national 

average and a bicyclist rate that was nearly triple. The Coalition meets regularly to discuss and update the 

progress of the PBSSP implementation.

The goal of the PBSSP is to:

• Advance data collection, analysis, and evaluation. 

• Establish clear priorities that guide the implementation of safety strategies towards areas with the 

highest representation of traffic crashes resulting in fatalities or serious injuries to pedestrians and 

bicyclists. 

• Eliminate pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities and serious injuries resulting from traffic crashes on public 

roads by decreasing the number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries based 

on the five-year rolling average as established in the State Highway Safety Improvement Plan and/or 

Strategic Highway Safety Plan. 

[Source: Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan, 2016]

[Source: Florida Pedestrian and Bicyclist Strategic Safety Plan, 2017]

Program: Intersection 

Date of Program Methodology: 9/1/2007 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

FHWA focused approach to safety

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Traffic Other-Mile Point 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 12 of 67

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

No

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

The same overall process is used, excluding traffic volume data and crash rates. 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Other-Districts coordinate with staff for projects and submit to Central Office for approval.

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C : 2

Cost Effectiveness : 1

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The mission of the Lane Departure and Intersection Coalition is to analyze data, develop strategies, and 

implement improvements to eliminate fatal and serious injury crashes for both intersections and lane 

departures. With assistance from the Federal Highway Administration, the Coalition has developed a Lane 

Departure Implementation Plan and is working on developing a similar plan for Intersections. In putting the plan 

together, the Coalition also relied on the progress made by other statewide coalitions such as the Safe Mobility 

for Life Coalition and the Florida Impaired Driving Coalition.

[Source: Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan, 2016]

Program: Pedestrian Safety 

Date of Program Methodology: 4/20/2017 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

FHWA focused approach to safety
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 13 of 67

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Population 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Other-Projects are identified using GIS analysis of crash locations and frequency.

Other-Contributing factors such as time of day (75% of fatal pedestrian and bicycle crashes occur during dusk 

or dark hours)

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

The same overall process is used, excluding traffic volume data and crash rates. 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Cost Effectiveness : 1

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Florida’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Coalition is a diverse group of national, state, and local partners and 
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 14 of 67

safety advocates that prioritizes and implements the strategies identified in the statewide Pedestrian and 

Bicycle Strategic Safety Plan (PBSSP) to reduce pedestrian and bicycle related fatalities and serious injuries 

as a result of traffic crash involvement on Florida’s roadways.

The PBSSP was finalized in 2013 in response to a pedestrian fatality rate that was nearly double the national 

average and a bicyclist rate that was nearly triple. The Coalition meets regularly to discuss and update the 

progress of the PBSSP implementation.

The goal of the PBSSP is to:

• Advance data collection, analysis, and evaluation. 

• Establish clear priorities that guide the implementation of safety strategies towards areas with the 

highest representation of traffic crashes resulting in fatalities or serious injuries to pedestrians and 

bicyclists. 

• Eliminate pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities and serious injuries resulting from traffic crashes on public 

roads by decreasing the number of non-motorized fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries based 

on the five-year rolling average as established in the State Highway Safety Improvement Plan and/or 

Strategic Highway Safety Plan.

[Source: Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan, 2016]

[Source: Florida Pedestrian and Bicyclist Strategic Safety Plan, 2017]

Program: Skid Hazard 

Date of Program Methodology: 9/1/2007 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

FHWA focused approach to safety

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Traffic Other-Friction Number 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Other-Locations with a high proportion of wet weather crashes are included in the screening process for skid 

hazard project locations. 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 15 of 67

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

The same overall process is used, excluding traffic volume data and crash rates. 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Program: Other-Lane Departure 

Date of Program Methodology: 9/1/2007 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

FHWA focused approach to safety

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Traffic Other-Mile Point 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 16 of 67

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

No

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

The same overall process is used, excluding traffic volume data and crash rates. 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Other-Districts coordinate with staff for projects and submit to Central Office for approval.

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C : 2

Cost Effectiveness : 1

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The mission of the Lane Departure and Intersection Coalition is to analyze data, develop strategies, and 

implement improvements to eliminate fatal and serious injury crashes for both intersections and lane 

departures. With assistance from the Federal Highway Administration, the Coalition has developed a Lane 

Departure Implementation Plan and is working on developing a similar plan for Intersections. In putting the plan 

together, the Coalition also relied on the progress made by other statewide coalitions such as the Safe Mobility 

for Life Coalition and the Florida Impaired Driving Coalition.

[Source: Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan, 2016]

What percentage of HSIP funds address systemic improvements?

 86

 HSIP funds are used to address which of the following systemic improvements? Please check all that 

apply.

Rumble Strips

Pavement/Shoulder Widening

Install/Improve Signing

Install/Improve Pavement Marking and/or Delineation

Install/Improve Lighting

Add/Upgrade/Modify/Remove Traffic Signal

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 17 of 67

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? [Check all that apply]

Engineering Study

Road Safety Assessment

Data-driven safety analysis tools (HSM, CMF Clearinghouse, SafetyAnalyst, usRAP)

Stakeholder input

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The objective of countermeasure selection is to choose countermeasures that address the concerns identified 

in site diagnosis. Rather than selecting a preferred countermeasure at this point, FDOT Districts compile a list 

of potentially applicable countermeasures for economic appraisal and prioritization (unless there is only one 

clear or acceptable solution). The best practice starts by considering low-cost countermeasures and then 

moving to higher cost options when lower-cost countermeasures are not desirable or appropriate for the site of 

interest.

[Source: FDOT HSIP Manual]

Does the State HSIP consider connected vehicles and ITS technologies? 

No

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The Florida HSIP does not consider connected vehicles and ITS (Intelligent Transportation System) 

technologies directly. However, the FDOT has an ITS Strategic Plan to provide statewide direction and 

guidance for the FDOT, Florida's Metropolitan Planning Organizations, and local governments in planning, 

programming, and implementing integrated multi-modal ITS elements to maximize the safety and efficiency of 

Florida's Transportation System. The priorities set by Florida’s ITS Strategic Plan align with the goals outlined 

in the 2025 Florida Transportation Plan . Each goal is supported by a corresponding group of ITS objectives 

and strategies that can be tracked using a common set of performance measures.

Florida’s ITS Strategic Plan defines the goals, objectives, and strategies for the statewide ITS Program over 

the next three to five years. During this time, many initiatives and programs will begin to mature and, therefore, 

should be considered by FDOT. These projects and programs include but are not limited to connected vehicles 

and ITS technologies and applications.

[Source: Florida Intelligent Transportation Systems Strategic Plan, 2014]

Does the State use the Highway Safety Manual to support HSIP efforts?

Yes

Please describe how the State uses the HSM to support HSIP efforts.
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 18 of 67

The Highway Safety Manual is in the early implementation efforts within the HSIP.

[Source: FDOT Traffic Safety Engineer, 2018]

Have any program methodology practices used to implement the HSIP changed since the last reporting 

period?

No

Are there any other aspects of the HSIP methodology on which the State would like to elaborate?

No
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 19 of 67

Project Implementation

Funds Programmed

Reporting period for HSIP funding.

State Fiscal Year

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category.

FUNDING CATEGORY PROGRAMMED OBLIGATED % OBLIGATED/PROGRAMMED

HSIP (23 U.S.C. 148) $116,745,345 $116,581,900 99.86%

HRRR Special Rule (23 U.S.C. 

148(g)(1))

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 154) $0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 164) $0 $0 0%

RHCP (for HSIP purposes) (23 

U.S.C. 130(e)(2))

$0 $0 0%

Other Federal-aid Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

$1,139,679 $1,121,489 98.4%

State and Local Funds $0 $0 0%

Totals $117,885,024 $117,703,389 99.85%

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Financial information based on data in FDOT Work Program and Budget Office systems.

[Source: MADDOG, FY2017/2018, as of 2018-06-18]

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) or tribal safety projects?

$18,000,713

How much funding is obligated to local or tribal safety projects?

$17,982,480

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Financial information is based on data in FDOT Work Program and Budget Office systems.

[Source: MADDOG, FY2017/2018, as of 2018-06-18]
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 20 of 67

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$7,438,351

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$7,438,249

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Reported figures are based on programmed and obligated HSIP funds for work mix descriptions of "preliminary 

engineering", "public information/education", "traffic engineering study", and "transportation statistics".

Financial information based on data in FDOT Work Program and Budget Office systems.

[Source: MADDOG, FY2017/2018, as of 2018-06-18]

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas during the reporting 

period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

$0

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during the reporting 

period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

$6,939,000

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

FDOT transferred HSIP funds during the state fiscal year 2017/2018 to enhance safety for school crossing 

zones through the Safe Routes to School program and to enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety through 

Florida’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Coalition.

Financial information is based on data in FDOT Work Program and Budget Office systems.

[Source: MADDOG, FY2017/2018, as of 2018-06-18]

Discuss impediments to obligating HSIP funds and plans to overcome this challenge in the future.

None to report at this time.

[Source: FDOT State Safety Engineer, 2018]

Does the State want to elaborate on any other aspects of it’s progress in implementing HSIP projects?
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 21 of 67

No
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 22 of 67

General Listing of Projects

List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period.

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

190258-1 Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

$294358 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Data

211079-2 Non-infrastructure $407617 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

211079-3 Alignment $374521 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

211079-4 Non-infrastructure $302154 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

211079-5 Non-infrastructure $171540 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

211079-6 Non-infrastructure $83971 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

211079-8 Non-infrastructure $423814 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

220838-2 $500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

222518-1 Lighting $34181 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

222524-1 Lighting $13741 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

222668-1 Lighting $86253 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

222713-1 Lighting $74454 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

222818-1 Lighting $57027 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

233166-2 Intersection 

geometry

$108708 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

237995-1 Non-infrastructure $474386 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

254553-1 Non-infrastructure $1418131 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

254646-1 $129008 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

254647-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$921877 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

254677-2 $4714862 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 23 of 67

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

256881-5 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$316986 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

258660-2 Roadway $15 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

405615-4 $140333 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

409224-1 Non-infrastructure $445906 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

412473-7 Roadway $833330 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

412473-9 $141921 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

412479-3 Roadway $4698 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

418439-1 Non-infrastructure $184103 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

423071-1 Interchange 

design

$48471 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

423608-2 Intersection 

geometry

$432991 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

425646-2 $100320 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

425646-3 Non-infrastructure $25549 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

425979-2 Roadway $25090 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

427280-1 Roadway $25000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

427452-1 Lighting $27449 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

427937-1 $76915 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

427937-2 Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

$389075 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Data

427938-1 $230645 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

428719-1 Roadway $1351754 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

428724-1 Roadway $4528 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

428725-1 Roadway $730061 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 24 of 67

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

428733-1 Roadway $566974 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

429014-1 Intersection 

geometry

$123179 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

429060-1 Roadway $26014 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

429060-2 Intersection 

geometry

$1295 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

429346-2 Lighting $30393 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

429506-1 Lighting $36450 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

429585-2 Intersection 

geometry

$2228190 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

429650-2 $300000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

429670-2 $539 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

429670-4 Shoulder 

treatments

$614 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

429675-2 Roadway 

delineation

$1032 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

429750-2 Shoulder 

treatments

$108 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

430590-2 Intersection traffic 

control

$127889 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

430608-2 Intersection traffic 

control

$76387 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

430768-1 Intersection 

geometry

$49307 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

430785-1 Roadway $943 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

430803-1 Roadway $20123 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

430808-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$62935 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

430852-1 Non-infrastructure $184661 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

430855-1 Access 

management

$9 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

430910-1 Intersection 

geometry

$114223 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 25 of 67

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

430911-1 Intersection 

geometry

$658925 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

430914-1 Intersection 

geometry

$1028155 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

431243-1 Roadway $10529 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

431635-1 $281428 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

431635-2 $349709 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

431657-1 $60000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

431666-1 $75239 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

431672-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$54677 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Pedestrians

431820-2 $670314 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

431820-3 $138600 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

432193-1 Roadway $11000001 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

432323-1 Roadway $185481 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

432404-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$791371 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

432421-1 Intersection 

geometry

$3807 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

432586-1 Roadway $2681 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

432647-2 Shoulder 

treatments

$8267 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

432648-1 Intersection 

geometry

$227563 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

432656-1 Roadway $443500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

432657-1 Intersection 

geometry

$65601 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

432659-1 $8077 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

432698-1 Roadway $656392 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 26 of 67

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

432720-1 Roadway $377381 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

432748-1 $55055 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

432748-2 Lighting $207150 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

432748-3 Lighting $366818 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

432883-2 Lighting $4832 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

432952-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$1782 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Pedestrians

433040-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$981800 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433059-2 $1233333 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

433111-1 Interchange 

design

$1541 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433206-1 Intersection 

geometry

$516 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

433264-1 Intersection 

geometry

$39583 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433286-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$499800 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

433376-1 Lighting $29 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

433390-1 Non-infrastructure $396912 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

433391-2 Non-infrastructure $510647 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

433391-3 Non-infrastructure $498692 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

433407-1 Intersection 

geometry

$6770 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433412-1 $1900609 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

433416-1 $497245 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

433436-1 Intersection 

geometry

$518 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

433455-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$18217 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 27 of 67

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

433455-2 Lighting $10000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

433485-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$1116 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433489-1 Intersection 

geometry

$19949 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433490-1 Access 

management

$72673 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433492-1 Access 

management

$37798 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433493-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$21500 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

433519-2 Intersection traffic 

control

$84021 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433519-3 Intersection 

geometry

$2960 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433522-1 Non-infrastructure $97726 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

433522-3 Non-infrastructure $1000000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

433564-2 Roadway $1079661 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

433875-1 Non-infrastructure $118486 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

434308-1 Intersection 

geometry

$604 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434314-1 Roadway 

delineation

$7032 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

434315-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$6842 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

434327-1 Lighting $1126222 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

434328-1 Lighting $1081158 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

434330-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$1656928 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Bicyclists

434333-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$52173 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

434337-1 Intersection 

geometry

$3738778 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434340-1 Lighting $2007550 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 28 of 67

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

434342-1 $4404133 HRRR Special 

Rule (23 U.S.C. 

148(g)(1))

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

434422-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$493607 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

434424-1 Access 

management

$1376574 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

434425-1 Access 

management

$1182048 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434426-1 Roadway $2074978 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434449-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$435890 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

434489-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$1018748 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

434502-1 Intersection 

geometry

$15237 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Pedestrians

434505-1 Intersection 

geometry

$742424 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434506-1 Lighting $617496 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434507-1 Intersection 

geometry

$761876 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

434508-1 Intersection 

geometry

$1413330 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

434509-1 Intersection 

geometry

$1389024 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434694-1 Intersection 

geometry

$542034 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434700-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$2893029 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

434701-1 Roadway 

delineation

$2011 HRRR Special 

Rule (23 U.S.C. 

148(g)(1))

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

434728-1 Intersection 

geometry

$1230 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

434768-1 $445383 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

434768-2 $422485 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434772-1 $399213 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 29 of 67

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

434773-1 Access 

management

$98050 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

434776-1 Intersection 

geometry

$1734373 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

434779-1 Non-infrastructure $210292 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434807-1 Roadway $715898 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434841-1 Roadway $1668965 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

434844-1 Intersection 

geometry

$257 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

434848-1 $25846 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

435052-1 Lighting $940056 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

435053-1 Lighting $1354452 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

435054-1 Lighting $3191587 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

435056-1 Lighting $813775 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

435057-1 Lighting $892724 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

435059-1 Lighting $5559216 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

435095-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$540186 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

435101-1 Roadway $1028210 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

435160-1 $7872 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

435255-1 Intersection 

geometry

$379061 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

435837-1 Intersection 

geometry

$29635 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

436011-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$1159871 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

436012-1 Intersection 

geometry

$2568 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

436013-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$3576 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 30 of 67

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

436013-2 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$4154 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

436023-1 Lighting $59850 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

436024-1 Intersection 

geometry

$704077 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

436041-1 Intersection 

geometry

$679144 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

436111-1 Lighting $104084 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

436113-1 Lighting $41290 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

436114-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$537733 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

436118-1 Access 

management

$38651 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

436119-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$255 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Pedestrians

436124-1 Lighting $10535 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

436135-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$22110 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

436235-1 Roadway 

delineation

$42557 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

436236-1 Roadway $70767 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

436237-1 Intersection 

geometry

$70079 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

436311-1 Intersection 

geometry

$16180 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

436312-1 Roadway signs 

and traffic control

$694532 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

436313-1 $16447 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

436385-1 $9083 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

436404-1 Intersection 

geometry

$25681 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

436547-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$87910 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

436551-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$120460 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 31 of 67

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

436569-1 Lighting $373960 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

436613-1 Non-infrastructure $109141 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Bicyclists

436614-1 Lighting $237900 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

437302-1 Roadway 

delineation

$98696 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

437354-1 Intersection 

geometry

$511276 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

437451-1 Intersection 

geometry

$398564 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

437458-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$167320 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

437485-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$120000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

437486-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$32000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

437592-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$355000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

437604-1 $166502 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

437605-1 Lighting $3121 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

437627-1 Roadway signs 

and traffic control

$3690 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

437629-1 Intersection 

geometry

$664819 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

437630-1 Lighting $5795 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

437634-1 Intersection 

geometry

$1235262 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

437647-1 $3804 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Pedestrians

437687-1 Intersection 

geometry

$1453294 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

437701-1 Lighting $597628 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

437702-1 $100000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

437707-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$295410 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 32 of 67

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

437708-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$155155 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

437718-1 Lighting $153520 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

437731-1 Lighting $23586 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

437807-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$285709 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

437916-1 $209280 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

437917-1 Intersection 

geometry

$150000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

437922-1 $167282 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

437923-1 $148204 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

438271-1 Lighting $71559 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

438275-1 Lighting $96601 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

438275-2 Lighting $170362 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

438276-1 Roadway signs 

and traffic control

$59864 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

438371-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$277606 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

438374-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$219828 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

438376-1 Intersection 

geometry

$150488 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439368-1 Intersection 

geometry

$1000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439458-1 Access 

management

$263890 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

439524-1 Roadway signs 

and traffic control

$716627 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

439557-1 Lighting $129955 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

439558-1 Lighting $57907 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

439561-1 Lighting $66984 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 33 of 67

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

439573-1 Lighting $95531 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439574-1 Lighting $267094 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439575-1 Lighting $246550 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439576-1 Lighting $74810 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439577-1 Lighting $206274 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439578-1 Lighting $108331 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439579-1 Lighting $119980 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439580-1 Lighting $112719 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439581-1 Lighting $105329 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439582-1 Lighting $24649 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439584-1 Lighting $76037 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439585-1 Lighting $40810 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439587-1 Lighting $98021 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439588-1 Lighting $28315 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439596-1 $13347 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Pedestrians

439679-1 Lighting $388687 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439782-1 Lighting $111077 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

439783-1 Lighting $212444 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439784-1 Lighting $121004 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439786-1 Lighting $72504 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439788-1 Lighting $31642 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 34 of 67

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

439789-1 Lighting $63856 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439790-1 Lighting $135285 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439792-1 Lighting $71745 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439793-1 Lighting $66007 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439795-1 Lighting $109810 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439829-1 Lighting $1335526 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439850-1 $750561 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439851-1 $750592 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439880-1 Lighting $45547 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

439880-3 Lighting $4538 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

439880-4 Lighting $123 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439880-5 Lighting $4769 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439880-6 Lighting $37971 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439880-7 Lighting $1731 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439881-1 Lighting $35621 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439881-2 Lighting $28480 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439881-3 Lighting $17075 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439881-4 Lighting $35874 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439881-5 Lighting $16811 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439883-1 Lighting $8146 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439883-2 Lighting $52219 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 35 of 67

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

439883-3 Lighting $49404 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439885-1 Lighting $84691 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439886-1 Lighting $232537 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

439887-1 Lighting $12158 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

440116-1 Lighting $675 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

440117-1 Lighting $165258 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

440125-1 Lighting $62 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

440126-1 Lighting $215 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

440128-1 Lighting $215 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

440133-1 Lighting $101 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

440135-1 Lighting $47 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

440137-1 Lighting $43 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

440138-1 Lighting $78 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

440663-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$34499 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Pedestrians

440679-1 $20224 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

441087-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$4120 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Financial and project information are from data systems maintained by the FDOT Work Program and Budget Office.

Projects with a blank for "Relevant SHSP Emphasis Area" address multiple SHSP emphasis areas.

Projects with HSIP Project Cost($) of a couple thousand or less refer to final administrative tasks for completed projects.

[Source: MADDOG, 2018]

[Source: FDOT HSIP Reporter, 2018]
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 36 of 67

Safety Performance

General Highway Safety Trends

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the State for the past five years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Fatalities 2,985 2,564 2,461 2,400 2,430 2,402 2,494 2,939 3,176

Serious Injuries 23,776 22,755 21,503 20,042 20,028 20,226 20,912 21,551 21,645

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 1.504 1.305 1.257 1.251 1.273 1.246 1.241 1.422 1.480

Serious injury rate (per 

HMVMT)

11.978 11.586 10.985 10.444 10.491 10.496 10.404 10.426 10.084

Number non-motorized 

fatalities

624 587 583 617 589 633 741 785 807

Number of non-motorized 

serious injuries

2,521 2,391 2,415 2,206 2,620 2,514 2,563 2,596 2,523
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 37 of 67

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Annual Fatalities

Fatalities 5 Year Rolling Avg.

18000

19000

20000

21000

22000

23000

24000

25000

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Annual Serious Injuries

Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 38 of 67

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Fatality rate (per HMVMT)

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.

9

9.5

10

10.5

11

11.5

12

12.5

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 39 of 67

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Florida shares the national traffic safety vision, "Toward Zero Deaths," and formally adopted our own version of 

the national vision, "Driving Down Fatalities," in 2012. The Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), updated in 

2016, is the statewide plan focusing on how to accomplish the vision of eliminating fatalities and reducing 

serious injuries on all public roads. Thirteen emphasis areas are the primary focus for Florida's traffic safety 

improvement efforts. FDOT supports a broad range of programs aimed at improving transportation safety.

The traffic safety programs include Aggressive Driving & Speed; Aging Road Users; Bicycle and Pedestrian 

Safety; Community Traffic Safety Teams; Occupant Protection; Distracted Driving; Drowsy Driving; Impaired 

Driving; Industrial Safety (worker safety); Motorcycle Safety; Police Traffic Service; Safe Routes to School; 

Safety Engineering (crash data); School Crossing Guard Training; Teen Drivers; Traffic Records System; 

Traffic Records Coordinating Committee (TRCC); and Work Zone Safety.

Florida traffic safety coalitions bring together multiple traffic safety partners, working to make Florida's 

roadways not only an efficient, but safe transportation system. Traffic safety coalitions include Florida Lane 

Departure and Intersection Coalition; Florida Impaired Driving Coalition; Florida's Pedestrian and Bicycle 

Safety Coalition; Florida Occupant Protection Coalition; Motorcycle Safety Coalition; Safe Mobility for Life 

Coalition; Distracted Driving Coalition; and the Work Zone Safety Coalition.

The number of fatal and serious injuries come from previous HSIP annual reports, the state crash data system 

managed by the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (DHSMV), and the Traffic Crash 

Report published by DHSMV based on the state crash data system.

[Source: Florida SHSP, 2016]

[Source: FDOT State Safety Office, Programs website ( http://www.fdot.gov/safety/2APrograms/Programs.shtm ), as of 2018-07-16]

[Source: FDOT State Safety Office, Traffic Safety Coalitions website ( 

2500

2600

2700

2800

2900

3000

3100

3200

3300

3400

3500

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Non Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Fatalities and Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 40 of 67

http://www.fdot.gov/safety/safety%20coalitions/coalitonsresources.shtm ), as of 2018-07-16]

[Source: Florida HSIP Annual Report, 2017]

[Source: Traffic Crash Facts, 2016]

[Source: FIRES (Florida's Integrated Report Exchange System) by DHSMV as of 2018-06-22]

[Source: FDOT Public Mileage Report, 2008-2016]

Describe fatality data source.

State Motor Vehicle Crash Database

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles is the official custodian of the state motor 

vehicle crash database. Access to the data is available through the Traffic Crash Facts annual report (which is 

static) or through FIRES (Florida's Integrated Report System).

[Source: Traffic Crash Facts Annual Report, 2016]

[Source: FIRES, https://www.firesportal.com/Pages/Public/Home.aspx ]

To the maximum extent possible, present this data by functional classification and ownership.

Year 2016

Functional Classification Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Principal Arterial 

(RPA) - Interstate

93 424.6 0.97 4.43

Rural Principal Arterial 

(RPA) - Other Freeways 

and Expressways

162.6 672.4 5.43 21.33

Rural Principal Arterial 

(RPA) - Other

40.6 139.8 0.55 1.9

Rural Minor Arterial 79.4 358.4 2.52 11.29

Rural Minor Collector 12.2 2.6 1.14 1.17

Rural Major Collector 15 41.2 0.78 1.59

Rural Local Road or Street 152.6 39.6 2.73 0.71

Urban Principal Arterial 

(UPA) - Interstate

191.4 1,293.8 0.7 4.75

Urban Principal Arterial 

(UPA) - Other Freeways 

and Expressways

80.4 403 0.63 3.19

Urban Principal Arterial 

(UPA) - Other

762.4 5,871 1.93 15.05

Urban Minor Arterial 266.8 1,722.4 1.49 10.67

Urban Minor Collector 4.6 1.2 0.22 0.21
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 41 of 67

Functional Classification Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Urban Major Collector 29.6 80.6 0.36 2.45

Urban Local Road or Street 210 43.2 0.54 0.11
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 42 of 67

Year 2016

Roadways Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

State Highway Agency 1,740.8 11,372.6 1.31 8.81

County Highway Agency

Town or Township 

Highway Agency

City of Municipal Highway 

Agency

State Park, Forest, or 

Reservation Agency

Local Park, Forest or 

Reservation Agency

Other State Agency

Other Local Agency 144 1,984 0.32 4.43

Private (Other than 

Railroad)

Railroad

State Toll Authority

Local Toll Authority

Other Public 

Instrumentality (e.g. 

Airport, School, University)

Indian Tribe Nation
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 43 of 67

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities by Functional Classification 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 44 of 67

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries by Functional 

Classification 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 45 of 67

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) by Functional 

Classification 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 46 of 67

0

5

10

15

20

25

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) by Functional 

Classification 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 47 of 67

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

State Highway Agency Other Local Agency Local Roads

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities by Roadway Ownership 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 48 of 67

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

State Highway Agency Other Local Agency Local Roads

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries by Roadway 

Ownership 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 49 of 67

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

State Highway Agency Other Local Agency Local Roads

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) by Roadway 

Ownership 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 50 of 67

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The number of fatal and serious injuries come from previous HSIP annual reports, the state crash data system 

managed by the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (DHSMV), and the Traffic Crash 

Report published by DHSMV based on the state crash data system.

[Source: Florida HSIP Annual Report, 2017]

[Source: Traffic Crash Facts, 2016]

[Source: FIRES (Florida's Integrated Report Exchange System) by DHSMV as of 2018-06-22]

[Source: FDOT Public Mileage Report, 2008-2016]

Are there any other aspects of the general highway safety trends on which the State would like to 

elaborate?

No

Safety Performance Targets

Safety Performance Targets

Calendar Year 2019 Targets * 

Number of Fatalities 0.0 

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

State Highway Agency Other Local Agency Local Roads

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) by Roadway 

Ownership 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 51 of 67

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for total fatalities on 

Florida's roads is forecast to be between 2,797 and 3,117 in 2019. This forecast was 

made by combining FARS data with current state data from 2009 to 2017 to predict 

probable outcomes for 2018 and 2019. Florida's target for fatalities is zero in 2019. 

While the data forecast indicates Florida's five year rolling average for fatalities could 

continue to trend upward in 2018 and 2019, the FDOT State Safety Office expects the 

projects chosen for funding will mitigate the data forecast and ultimately reduce the 

number of traffic fatalities. An interim performance measure is required by our federal 

funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly believe that every life 

counts and although our target for fatalities is zero in 2019, Florida has forecast an 

interim performance measure of 3,117 in order to satisfy the federal requirement. 

Number of Serious Injuries 0.0 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for total serious injuries 

on Florida's roads is forecast to be between 19,340 and 21,107 in 2019. This forecast 

was made by combining FARS data with current state data from 2009 to 2017 to 

predict probable outcomes for 2018 and 2019. Florida's target for serious injuries is 

zero in 2019. The data forecast indicates Florida's five year rolling average for serious 

injuries could continue to trend downward in 2018 and 2019. The FDOT State Safety 

Office expects the projects chosen for funding will enhance the downward trend in the 

number of serious injuries on Florida's roads. An interim performance measure is 

required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly 

believe that every life counts and although our target for serious injuries is zero in 

2019, Florida has forecast an interim performance measure of 21,107 in order to 

satisfy the federal requirement. 

Fatality Rate 0.000 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for fatality rate per 100 

million Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) on Florida's roads is forecast to be between 

1.08 and 1.63 in 2019. This forecast was made by combining FARS data with current 

state data from 2009 to 2017 to predict probable outcomes for 2018 and 2019. 

Florida's target for fatality rate per 100 million VMT is zero in 2019. While the data 

forecast indicates Florida's five year rolling average for fatality rate per 100 million 

VMT could continue to trend upward in 2018 and 2019, the FDOT State Safety Office 

expects the projects chosen for funding will mitigate the data forecast and ultimately 

reduce the fatality rate per 100 million VMT. An interim performance measure is 

required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly 

believe that every life counts and although our target for fatality rate per 100 million 

VMT is zero in 2019, Florida has forecast an interim performance measure of 1.63 in 

order to satisfy the federal requirement. 
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 52 of 67

Serious Injury Rate 0.000 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for total serious injury 

rate per 100 million VMT on Florida's roads is forecast to be between 7.789 and 

10.846 in 2019. This forecast was made by combining FARS data with current state 

data from 2009 to 2017 to predict probable outcomes for 2018 and 2019. Florida's 

target for serious injury rate per 100 million VMT is zero in 2019. The data forecast 

indicates Florida's five year rolling average for serious injury rate per 100 million 

VMT could continue to trend downward in 2018 and 2019. The FDOT State Safety 

Office expects the projects chosen for funding will enhance the downward trend in the 

serious injury rate per 100 million VMT on Florida's roads. An interim performance 

measure is required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal 

funding. We firmly believe that every life counts and although our target for serious 

injury rate per 100 million VMT is zero in 2019, Florida has forecast an interim 

performance measure of 10.846 in order to satisfy the federal requirement. 

Total Number of Non-Motorized 

Fatalities and Serious Injuries 0.0 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for non-motorized 

fatalities and serious injuries on Florida's roads is forecast to be between 3,117 and 

3,801 in 2019. This forecast was made by combining FARS data with current state 

data from 2009 to 2017 to predict probable outcomes for 2018 and 2019. Florida's 

target for non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries is zero in 2019. The data 

forecast indicates Florida's five year rolling average for non-motorized fatalities and 

serious injuries could continue to tend downward in 2018 and 2019. The FDOT State 

Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will enhance this downward 

trend in non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries. An interim performance measure 

is required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We 

firmly believe that every life counts and although our target for non-motorized 

fatalities and serious injuries is zero in 2019, Florida has forecast an interim 

performance measure of 3,801 in order to satisfy the federal requirement. 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Florida shares the national traffic safety vision, "Toward Zero Deaths," and formally adopted our own version of 

the national vision, "Driving Down Fatalities," in 2012. FDOT and its traffic safety partners are committed to 

eliminating fatalities and reducing serious injuries with the understanding that the death of any person is 

unacceptable and based on that, zero deaths is our safety performance target. This target is consistent 

throughout our Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety 

Plan.

Florida’s data forecasts have been established using an ARIMA Hybrid Regression Model (0, 1,1)(2,0,0)(12) 

with VMT. Nine independent variables were tested to assess correlations; only Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) 

and gas consumption have relatively high correlations with fatalities and serious injuries and of these two 

variables only VMT was useful in predicting future fatalities and serious injuries. The first three performance 
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 53 of 67

measures (number of fatalities, number of serious injuries, and fatality rate per 100M VMT) have been 

forecasted based on a five year rolling average and the remaining performance measures will be forecasted 

annually. The forecasts for 2017 and 2018 are based on monthly data from 2005 through 2016 using statistical 

forecasting methodologies.

Forecasts for serious injury rate per 100 million VMT and non-motorist fatal and serious injuries have been 

established using the AAA version of the Exponential Smoothing (ETS) algorithm.

[Source: FDOT Highway Safety Plan, 2018]

Describe efforts to coordinate with other stakeholders (e.g. MPOs, SHSO) to establish safety performance 

targets. 

Florida's transportation system is large, multimodal, and owned by a number of entities including the state 

government, local governments (cities and counties), the federal government, and the private sector. The 2016 

SHSP (Strategic Highway Safety Plan) is aimed at all public roads and was updated through collaboration with 

Florida’s safety partners. It is aligned with and builds on the recently adopted FTP (Florida Transportation 

Plan), the state’s long range transportation plan. Stakeholders include:

• Florida Department of Transportation, 

• Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, 

• Florida Highway Patrol, 

• Florida Sheriffs Association, 

• Florida Police Chiefs Association, 

• Metropolitan Planning Organizations Advisory Council, 

• Florida Rail Enterprise, 

• Florida Association of County Engineers and Road Superintendents, 

• Federal Highway Administration, 

• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and 

• Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. 

Florida shares the national traffic safety vision, "Toward Zero Deaths," and formally adopted our own version of 

the national vision, "Driving Down Fatalities," in 2012. FDOT and its traffic safety partners are committed to 

eliminating fatalities and reducing serious injuries with the understanding that the death of any person is 

unacceptable and based on that, zero deaths is our safety performance target. This target is consistent 

throughout our SHSP, HSIP, and HSP (Highway Safety Plan).

[Source: Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan, 2016]

[Source: Florida Highway Safety Plan, 2018]

Does the State want to report additional optional targets? 

No

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Applicability of Special Rules
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 54 of 67

Does the HRRR special rule apply to the State for this reporting period? 

No

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

According to Section 148(g)(1) of title 23, United States Code (USC) establishing a HRRR Special Rule, the 

rule is triggered if the fatality rate on rural roads increases over the most recent 2-year period. The rural road 

fatality rate per 100 million VMT on Florida's roads is 2.636 for 2015 and 2.398 for 2016.

[Source: FHWA Memorandum, 23 USC 148(g)(1) High Risk Rural Roads Special Rule, 2017]

[Source: FDOT SSO Staff, 2018]

Provide the number of older driver and pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries 65 years of age and 

older for the past seven years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Number of Older Driver and 

Pedestrian Fatalities

439 389 419 409 433 444 554

Number of Older Driver and 

Pedestrian Serious Injuries

2,345 2,355 2,377 2,402 2,592 2,702 2,824

Older Population per 1K 3,260 3,359 3,509 3,479 3,631 3,735 3,867

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

# of Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Years

Number of Older Driver and Pedestrian Fatalities and Serious Injuries by 

Year.

Fatalities Serious Injuries
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 55 of 67

Florida shares the national traffic safety vision, "Toward Zero Deaths," and formally adopted our own version of 

the national vision, "Driving Down Fatalities," in 2012. The Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), updated in 

2016, is the statewide plan focusing on how to accomplish the vision of eliminating fatalities and reducing 

serious injuries on al public roads. FDOT supports the Aging Road Users program aimed at improving 

transportation safety.

Florida is also leading the nation in preparing to meet the transportation safety and mobility challenges that 

arise from the inevitable increases to the aging population. FDOT developed and maintains a website to 

support work and efforts of our Safe Mobility for Life Coalition. It is the coalition's mission to reduce crashes by 

improving the safety, access, and mobility of Florida's aging road users ( 

http://www.FLsams.org/floridacoalition.htm ). The coalition oversees the development and implementation of 

Florida's Aging Road User Strategic Plan that includes six focus areas - program management, data, and 

evaluation; outreach and advocacy; aging in place; licensing and enforcement; prevention and assessment; 

transitioning from driving. The purpose of the strategic plan is to improve the safety, access, and mobility of 

Florida's aging population by addressing areas critical to the needs and concerns of the target population.

The number of fatal and serious injuries come from previous HSIP annual reports, the state crash data system 

managed by the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (DHSMV), and the Traffic Crash 

Report published by DHSMV based on the state crash data system.

[Source: Florida SHSP, 2016]

[Source: Florida Aging Road User Strategic Safety Plan, 2017]

[Source: FDOT State Safety Office, Programs website ( http://www.fdot.gov/safety/2APrograms/Programs.shtm ), as of 2018-07-16]

[Source: FDOT State Safety Office, Traffic Safety Coalitions website ( 

http://www.fdot.gov/safety/safety%20coalitions/coalitonsresources.shtm ), as of 2018-07-16]

[Source: Florida HSIP Annual Report, 2017]

[Source: Traffic Crash Facts, 2016]

[Source: FIRES (Florida's Integrated Report Exchange System) by DHSMV as of 2018-06-22]

[Source: UF BEBR (Bureau of Economic and Business Research) as of 2018-06-26]
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 56 of 67

Evaluation

Program Effectiveness

How does the State measure effectiveness of the HSIP?

Change in fatalities and serious injuries

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and its partners are committed to eliminating fatalities and 

reducing serious injuries with the understanding that the death of any person is unacceptable. Therefore, the 

effectiveness of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is measured by its effect on fatalities and 

serious injuries in the State of Florida.

[Source: Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan, 2016]

Based on the measures of effectiveness selected previously, describe the results of the State's program 

level evaluations.

OVERALL

FDOT administers programs for lane departure, intersections, and non-motorists (i.e. bicyclists and 

pedestrians) under the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). Based on statistical forecasting total 

fatalities on Florida's roads could trend upward for 2018 and 2019 (see Question 34), total serious injuries 

could trend downward for 2018 and 2019 (see Question 34), the fatalities rate per 100 million vehicle miles 

could trend upward for 2018 and 2019 (see Question 34), and serious injuries rate per 100 million vehicle mils 

could trend downward for 2018 and 2019 (see Question 34).

LANE DEPARTURE

The five year rolling average of traffic fatalities attributed to lane departure continues to trend upward (see 

Question 43). The five year rolling average of serious injuries attributed to lane departure has an over trend 

downward (see Question 43). The five year rolling average for fatalities rate per 100 million vehicle miles 

attributed to lane departure has an overall trend downward (see Question 43). The FDOT State Safety Office 

expects the projects chosen for funding will mitigate the upward trends related to fatalities and enhance 

downward trends related to serious injuries attributed to lane departure on Florida's roads.

INTERSECTIONS

The five year rolling average of traffic fatalities attributed to intersections continues to trend upward (see 

Question 43). The five year rolling average of serious injuries attributed to intersections continues to trend 

downward (see Question 43). The five year rolling average for fatalities rate per 100 million vehicle miles 

attributed to intersections continues to trend upward (see Question 43). The five year rolling average for 

serious injuries rate per 100 million vehicle miles attributed to intersections continues to trend downward (see 

Question 43). The FDOT State Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will mitigate the upward 

trends related to fatalities and enhance the downward trends related to serious injuries attributed to 

intersections on Florida's roads.
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 57 of 67

NON-MOTORISTS (I.E. BICYCLISTS AND PEDESTRIANS)

The five year rolling average of traffic fatalities attributed to non-motorists (i.e. bicyclists and pedestrians) 

continues to trend upward (see Question 43). The five year rolling average of serious injuries attributed to nonmotorists has an overall trend that is relatively flat (see Question 43). The five year rolling average for fatalities 

rate per 100 million vehicle miles attributed to non-motorists continues to gradually trend upward (see Question 

43). The five year rolling average for serious injuries rate per 100 million vehicle miles attributed to nonmotorists has an overall trend that is relatively flat (see Question 43). The FDOT State Safety Office expects 

the projects chosen for funding will mitigate the gradual upward trends related to fatalities and serious injuries 

attributed to non-motorists on Florida's roads.

What other indicators of success does the State use to demonstrate effectiveness and success of the 

Highway Safety Improvement Program?

Other-Reduction in fatalities and serious injuries

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and its partners are committed to eliminating fatalities and 

reducing serious injuries with the understanding that the death of any person is unacceptable. Therefore, the 

effectiveness and success of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is measured by its effect on 

fatalities and serious injuries in the State of Florida.

[Source: Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan, 2016]

Are there any significant programmatic changes that have occurred since the last reporting period? 

No

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements

Present and describe trends in SHSP emphasis area performance measures.

Year 2016

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted 

Crash Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality 

Rate

(per 

HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious 

Injury Rate

(per 

HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Other 1 Other 2 Other 3

Lane Departure 1,129.4 5,666.4 0.56 2.8 0 0 0

Intersections 856.6 8,867 0.43 4.42 0 0 0

Pedestrians and Bicyclists 713 2,342.2 0.35 1.17 0 0 0
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 58 of 67

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Lane Departure Intersections Pedestrians and Bicyclists

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

Lane Departure Intersections Pedestrians and Bicyclists

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 59 of 67

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The number of fatal and serious injuries come from previous HSIP annual reports, the state crash data system 

managed by the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (DHSMV), and the Traffic Crash 

Report published by DHSMV based on the state crash data system. The number of fatal and serious injuries 

for lane departures come from a copy of the state crash data system managed by the Florida Department of 

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Lane Departure Intersections Pedestrians and Bicyclists

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Lane Departure Intersections Pedestrians and Bicyclists

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 60 of 67

Transportation (FDOT).

[Source: Florida HSIP Annual Report, 2017]

[Source: Traffic Crash Facts, 2016]

[Source: FIRES (Florida's Integrated Report Exchange System) by DHSMV as of 2018-06-22]

[Source: FDOT Public Mileage Report, 2008-2016]

Has the State completed any countermeasure effectiveness evaluations during the reporting period?

Yes

Please provide the following summary information for each countermeasure effectiveness evaluation. 

CounterMeasures: All 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 

Number of Installations: 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 

Years After: 

Methodology: 

Results: 

FDOT has CRF (crash reduction 

factor) values for over 130 different 

countermeasures. A file listing 

improvement types, number of 

projects and other information 

including CRF values is attached. 

File Name: hsip 2018 - crf data (2018-04-09).xlsx
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 61 of 67

Project Effectiveness

Provide the following information for previously implemented projects that the State evaluated this reporting period. 

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

BEFORE

ALL OTHER 

INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

All

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

According to the CRASH (Crash Reduction Analysis System Hub) application maintained by the FDOT State Safety Office, 991 projects were used for evaluation. A data file with summary results for each project is attached to the Project 

Effectiveness section.

[Source: CRASH application by FDOT State Safety Office, as of 2018-06-27]

Are there any other aspects of the overall HSIP effectiveness on which the State would like to elaborate?

No
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 62 of 67

Compliance Assessment

What date was the State’s current SHSP approved by the Governor or designated State representative?

 07/28/2016

What are the years being covered by the current SHSP?

From: 2016 To: 2021

When does the State anticipate completing it’s next SHSP update?

 2021

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Provide the current status (percent complete) of MIRE fundamental data elements collection efforts using the table below. 

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

MIRE NAME (MIRE NO.) STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

ROADWAY SEGMENT

Segment Identifier (12) 100 100 0 100 0 100

Route Number (8) 100 100

Route/Street Name (9) 100 100

Federal Aid/Route Type 

(21)

100 100

Rural/Urban Designation 

(20)

100 100 0 0

Surface Type (23) 100 100 0 0

Begin Point Segment 

Descriptor (10)

100 100 0 100 0 0

End Point Segment 

Descriptor (11)

100 100 0 100 0 0

Segment Length (13) 100 100

Direction of Inventory (18) 100 100

Functional Class (19) 100 100 0 100 0 100

Median Type (54) 100 100

Access Control (22) 100 100
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 63 of 67

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

MIRE NAME (MIRE NO.) STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

One/Two Way Operations 

(91)

100 100

Number of Through Lanes 

(31)

100 100 0 0

Average Annual Daily 

Traffic (79)

100 100 0 100

AADT Year (80) 100 100

Type of Governmental 

Ownership (4)

100 100 0 0 0 0

INTERSECTION

Unique Junction Identifier 

(120)

100 100

Location Identifier for 

Road 1 Crossing Point 

(122)

100 100

Location Identifier for 

Road 2 Crossing Point 

(123)

100 100

Intersection/Junction 

Geometry (126)

0 0

Intersection/Junction 

Traffic Control (131)

0 100

AADT for Each 

Intersecting Road (79)

100 100

AADT Year (80) 100 100

Unique Approach 

Identifier (139)

100 100

INTERCHANGE/RAMP

Unique Interchange 

Identifier (178)

0 0

Location Identifier for 

Roadway at Beginning of 

Ramp Terminal (197)

100 100

Location Identifier for 

Roadway at Ending Ramp 

Terminal (201)

100 100

Ramp Length (187) 100 100

Roadway Type at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (195)

100 100

Roadway Type at End 

Ramp Terminal (199)

100 100
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 64 of 67

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

MIRE NAME (MIRE NO.) STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Interchange Type (182) 100 100

Ramp AADT (191) 100 100

Year of Ramp AADT (192) 100 100

Functional Class (19) 100 100

Type of Governmental 

Ownership (4)

100 100

Totals (Average Percent 

Complete):

100.00 100.00 75.00 87.50 90.91 90.91 0.00 55.56 0.00 40.00

*Based on Functional Classification

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The FDOT Transportation Data and Analytics (TDA) Office is the central clearing house and principal source for highway, traffic, travel time, multimodal, and freight and passenger data information. FDOT TDA manages the Roadway 

Characteristics Inventory (RCI) which contains MIRE (Model Inventory Roadway Element) FDE (Fundamental Data Element) information for state-maintained public roads and some locally-maintained public roads.

[Source: FDOT Transportation Data and Analytics Office website ( http://www.fdot.gov/statistics/ ), as of 2018-07-03]

Describe actions the State will take moving forward to meet the requirement to have complete access to the MIRE fundamental data elements on all public roads by September 30, 2026.

The Florida TRCC (Traffic Records Coordinating Committee) provides a statewide forum to facilitate the planning, coordination, and implementation of projects to improve the State of Florida's traffic records system. Objective 2.1 of the 

Action Plan for the 2011-2021 Florida Traffic Records Strategic Plan includes improving completeness of the Roadway Data System. Objective 2.3 includes improving uniformity of the Roadway Data System and working toward an 

integrated roadway data system with a map meeting the needs of multiple offices. Percent completion of MIRE (Model Inventory Roadway Elements) compliant data elements in the Roadway Data System is a performance measure.

The custodian of Florida's roadway data system is the Florida Department of Transportation. The FDOT roadway data system, called the Roadway Characteristics Inventory, contains 36,280 centerline miles of estimated state total of 

122,848 centerline miles. Out of the 36,280 centerline miles about 12,107 is considered State Highway System that is maintained by FDOT. The 24,173 centerline miles not maintained by FDOT are considered Off-System include 

functional classifications above local classifications as well as local classification. The remaining estimated 86,568 centerline miles not in the RCI are primarily roads that are maintained by local agencies in cities and counties. These local 

agencies submit paved and unpaved mileage data to support the State Certified Public Mileage and do not submit the necessary MIRE roadway data elements.

Meeting the advisory would require the inclusion of data for all public roadways and to have performance measures applied to the entire system. In addition to including local data, consideration should be given to interfacing with regional 

and local data custodians, such as MPOs. The collected data elements should be updated for inclusion of the MIRE FDEs. Finally, a review of the data dictionary should be made with the addition of any data elements that might be 

needed to apply to the inclusion of roadway data for non-State-maintained roadways.

The State indicated that not all of the MIRE FDE (Fundamental Data Elements) are collected for all public roads. The Florida All Roads BaseMap (ARBM) is published on FDOT's Unified Basemap Repository (UBR). The ARBM contains 

some MIRE FDEs for all public roads, for example Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT). The FDOT also sponsored research to collect MIRE FDEs for all public roads. Contract BDV29-977-07 focused on the extraction of basic roadway 

information for non-State roads. The FDOT State Safety Office indicates multiple teams in FDOT are working to acquire MIRE on all public roads with a priority for MIRE FDE.

[Source: Florida Traffic Safety Information System Strategic Plan, 2017]

[Source: FDOT Unified Basemap Repository ( https://ubr.fdot.gov/featured ), as of 2018-07-03]

[Source: FDOT Research Center, Documents and Publications ( http://www.fdot.gov/research/documents.shtm ), as of 2018-07-02]

[Source: FDOT State Safety Office Staff, 2018]

[Source: FDOT Transportation Data and Analytics Staff, 2018]

Provide the suspected serious injury identifier, definition and attributes used by the State for both the crash report form and the crash database using the table below. Please also indicate whether or not these elements are 

compliant with the MMUCC 4th edition criteria for data element P5. Injury Status, suspected serious injury. 
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 65 of 67

CRITERIA SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY 

IDENTIFIER(NAME) MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY DEFINITION MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY ATTRIBUTES(DESCRIPTORS) MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * 

Crash Report Form Incapacitating Injury Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes

Crash Report Form Instruction Manual Incapacitating Injury Yes Injury Severity (INJ) = 4. Incapacitating

Incapacitating injuries are disabling injuries, 

such as broken bones, severed limbs, etc. 

These injuries usually

require hospitalization and transport to 

medical facility.

Yes Injury Severity (INJ) = 4. Incapacitating

Incapacitating injuries are disabling injuries, 

such as broken bones, severed limbs, etc. 

These injuries usually

require hospitalization and transport to 

medical facility.

Yes

Crash Database Incapacitating Injury Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes

Crash Database Data Dictionary Incapacitating Injury Yes Injury Severity (INJ) = 4. Incapacitating

Incapacitating injuries are disabling injuries, 

such as broken bones, severed limbs, etc. 

These injuries usually

require hospitalization and transport to 

medical facility.

Yes Injury Severity (INJ) = 4. Incapacitating

Incapacitating injuries are disabling injuries, 

such as broken bones, severed limbs, etc. 

These injuries usually

require hospitalization and transport to 

medical facility.

Yes

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Did the State conduct an HSIP program assessment during the reporting period?

No

When does the State plan to complete it’s next HSIP program assessment.

2018

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 66 of 67

Optional Attachments

Program Structure:

FL HSIP Guideline 1991.pdf

Project Implementation:

Safety Performance:

Evaluation:

hsip 2018 - crf data (2018-04-09).xlsx

hsip 2018 - implemented project eval (2018-06-27).xlsx

Compliance Assessment:
2018 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 67 of 67

Glossary

5 year rolling 

average 

means the average of five individuals, consecutive annual points of data (e.g. annual 

fatality rate). 

Emphasis area means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process. 

Highway safety 

improvement 

project 

means strategies, activities and projects on a public road that are consistent with a State 

strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous road location or 

feature or addresses a highway safety problem. 

HMVMT means hundred million vehicle miles traveled. 

Non-infrastructure 

projects 

are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of non-infrastructure projects 

include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, improvements in the 

collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement activities. 

Older driver special 

rule 

applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and pedestrians over 

the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which data are 

available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance 

dated February 13, 2013. 

Performance 

measure 

means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to monitor changes 

in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and objectives. 

Programmed funds mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects. 

Roadway 

Functional 

Classification 

means the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, 

according to the character of service they are intended to provide. 

Strategic Highway 

Safety Plan (SHSP) 

means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on safety data developed by a 

State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148. 

Systematic refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across a 

system. 

Systemic safety 

improvement 

means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high risk roadway features 

that are correlated with specific severe crash types. 

Transfer 

means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned 

for the fiscal year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.