alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

# **INSWEBCORPORATION**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I,Kiran Rasaretnam, Chief Financial Officer of InsWeb Corporation, certify that:

 

(1)                                  I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of InsWeb Corporation;

 

(2)                                  Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

(3)                                  Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

(4)                                  The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e), for the registrant and we have:

 

a.           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.           Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 (5)                               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

 

a.           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b.          Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| ** **                | **/s/  KIRAN RASARETNAM** |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|
| Dated:  November 14, 2007 | **Kiran Rasaretnam**      |
|                      | Chief  Financial Officer  |

 

----
60°0'0"E 62°0'0"E 64°0'0"E 66°0'0"E 68°0'0"E 70°0'0"E 72°0'0"E 74°0'0"E 76°0'0"E

38°0'0"N

36°0'0"N

34°0'0"N

32°0'0"N

30°0'0"N

1 Khanneshin

Carbonatite

EXPLANATION

Area of interest

Province border

Country border

Scale 1:7,000,000

15 South Helmand

Travertine, copper, gold

10 Tourmaline

Tin

9 Dusar-Shaida

Copper, tin

20 Herat

Baruim, limestone

12 Nalbandon

Lead, zinc

25 Ahankashan

Gold, copper

26 Kandahar

Bauxite

 11

KharnakKanjar

Mercury

 21

Bakhud

Flourite 8 Kundalyan

Gold, copper

14 Katawas

Gold

23 Ghunday-Achin

Magnesite, talc

5 Aynak

Copper

3 Haji-Gak

Iron

2 Balkhab

Copper

16 Baghlan

Clay, gypsum

 18

Dudkash

Industrial

minerals

19 Kunduz

Celestite

28 N. Bamyan

Copper

27 S. Bamyan

Spectral anomaly

13 Panjsher Valley

Emeralds, 

 silver

24 Nuristan

Pegmatites

17 Takhar

Evaporite

 4

 North 

Takhar

Placer gold

 6

Badakhshan

Lode gold

HERAT

FARAH

NIMROZ

HELMAND

KANDAHAR

ZABUL

GHAZNI

PAKTIKA

URUZGAN

GHOR

DAYKUNDI

BADGHIS

FARYAB

SARI-PUL

JAWZJAN

BALKH

SAMANGAN

BAMYAN WARDAK

LOGAR

KABUL

PAKTYA

KHOST

NANGARHAR

LAGHMAN

KUNAR

BADAKHSHAN

TAKHAR

KUNDUZ

BAGHLAN

PARWAN KAPISA

NURISTAN

0 100 200 KILOMETERS

0 75 150 MILES

PANJSHER

22 Uruzgan

Tin, tungsten

7 Zarkashan

Gold, copper

29 Parwan

Gold, copper
#### Honorable Robert A. BUTTERWORTH, in his capacity as a County Court Judge in and for Broward County, Florida, Petitioner, v. Robert W. HARDIN, Respondent.

No. 77-278.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 13, 1978.

*454Michael J. Satz, State’s Atty., and William W. Herring and Patti Englander, Asst. State’s Attys., Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Bernard S. Yedlin, Miami, for respondent.

DOWNEY, Chief Judge.

The State of Florida has appealed the issuance of a writ of prohibition in which the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit prohibited the County Court from proceeding to trial of appellee for violation of a municipal ordinance.

Appellee filed a request for transfer of his ordinance violation from the Municipal Court of Pembroke Pines to the County Court of Broward County. The Municipal Judge signed the order of transfer and seven days later the Clerk of the Municipal Court received the order and effected the transfer on that same day. Appellee sought a writ of prohibition in the Circuit Court to prohibit the Appellant County Judge from proceeding with a trial of his case. It was appellee’s contention that the Municipal Court had not complied with the three day requirement for transfer of the record to the County Court.

Section 932.61, Florida Statutes (1975), requires a municipal judge to forthwith entertain a petition for transfer to a court providing jury trials and, upon finding the petition to be correct, order by written endorsement on the petition, the transfer of the cause to the appropriate court. The statute goes on to provide that the Clerk of the Municipal Court shall within three days from receipt of the judge’s order transfer the original record to the appropriate court.

There is no claim here that the municipal judge did not entertain the petition forthwith or that the clerk did not transfer the record within three days as required by the statute. On the contrary, appellee alleged in his petition for writ of prohibition in the Circuit Court that “the municipality had failed to transfer the said cause to the County within the requisite three (3) days from the date of the signing of the order of transfer, pursuant to F.S. 932.61(4).” Ap-pellee argued the three day requirement was mandatory and jurisdictional and, thus, the County Court should not be allowed to proceed.

We need not reach the merits of appel-lee’s contention regarding the mandatory versus directory aspect of the statutory section involved because the three day time specification was complied with. That requirement pertains to the clerk’s transfer of the record *after receipt*of the judge’s order, not three days after the date of the order.

In view of the foregoing the County Court acted within its jurisdiction in denying appellee’s motion to dismiss the charges and the issuance of the writ of prohibition was error and is accordingly reversed.

*455CROSS, J., concurs.

DAUKSCH, J., dissents without opinion.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26223]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Public Outreach Meeting

September 29, 1997.
    The Office of Hydropower Licensing will hold a public Outreach 
Meeting in Sacramento, California, on Thursday, October 23, 1997. The 
Outreach Meeting is scheduled to start at 9:00 am and finish at 5:00 
pm.
    The purpose of the outreach program is to familiarize federal, 
state, and other government agencies, Indian tribes, nongovernmental 
organizations, licensees, and other interested parties with the 
Commission's hydropower licensing program. The topics for the Outreach 
Meeting are pre-licensing, licensing, and post-licensing procedures for 
hydroelectric projects in California whose licenses expire between 
calender years 2000 and 2010.
    Staff from the Commission's Office of Hydropower Licensing will 
preside over the meetings.
    The location of the Outreach Meeting is: U.S. Fish & Wildlife 
Service, Sacramento Field Office, Conference Room A&B, 3310 El Camino 
Ave, Sacramento, CA 95821, (916) 979-2117.
    The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service office is located approximately 8 
miles northeast of downtown Sacramento; off--U.S. Business--80 at El 
Camino Ave.
    If you plan to attend, notify John Blair, Western Outreach 
Coordinator, fax: 202-219-2152; telephone: 202-219-2845).
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26223 Filed 10-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### Jimmie Lee TUGGERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-365.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 15, 1970.

Jimmie Lee Tuggerson, in Pro. Per., appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is Affirmed. See Ward v. State, 236 So.2d 187 (Fla.App.1970).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the:

1. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-74634) pertaining to the Regal 
Cinemas, Inc. Participant Stock Option Plan, Regal Cinemas, Inc. Employee Stock 
Option Plan, 1993 Employee Stock Incentive Plan and 1993 Outside Directors' 
Stock Option Plan of Regal Cinemas, Inc.;

2. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-13295) pertaining to the 401(k) 
Profit Sharing Plan of Regal Cinemas, Inc.;

3. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-13291) pertaining to the 1993 
Employee Stock Incentive Plan of Regal Cinemas, Inc.;

4. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-52943) pertaining to the Regal 
Cinemas, Inc. Participant Stock Option Plan, Regal Cinemas, Inc. Employee Stock 
Option Plan, 1993 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, and 1998 Stock Purchase and 
Option Plan for Key Employees of Regal Cinemas, Inc.;

of our report dated July 2, 1997 (with respect to the consolidated financial 
statements of Cobb Theatres, L.L.C. for the year ended December 31, 1996 
included in the Current Report on Form 8-K/A (Amendment No. 1) dated September 
10, 1997 of Regal Cinemas, Inc.) appearing in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of 
Regal Cinemas, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998.







                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                          ---------------------




Birmingham, Alabama
March 29, 1999
Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATE OF MARTIN NIELSON
                           AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Magtron International Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, Martin Nielson, Chief Executive Officer and Anthony Lee, Chief Financial
Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Martin Nielson
-----------------------
Martin Nielson
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2005


/s/ Anthony Lee
-----------------------
Anthony Lee
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2005
PUBLIC LAW 104–23—SEPT. 6, 1995 109 STAT. 261

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 535:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–34 (Comm. on Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):

June 7, considered and passed House.

Aug. 9, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–23

104th Congress

An Act

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Corning National Fish Hatchery

to the State of Arkansas.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Corning National Fish Hatchery

Conveyance Act’’.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF CORNING NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY TO

THE STATE OF ARKANSAS.

(a) CONVEYANCE REQUIREMENT.—Within 180 days after the

date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior

shall convey to the State of Arkansas without reimbursement all

right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the property

described in subsection (b), for use by the Arkansas Game and

Fish Commission as part of the State of Arkansas fish culture

program.

(b) PROPERTY DESCRIBED.—The property referred to in subsection (a) is the property known as the Corning National Fish

Hatchery (popularly known as the William H. Donham State Fish

Hatchery), located one mile west of Corning, Arkansas, on Arkansas

State Highway 67 in Clay County, Arkansas, consisting of 137.34

acres (more or less), and all improvements and related personal

property under the control of the Secretary that is located on

that property, including buildings, structures, and equipment.

(c) USE AND REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—The property conveyed

to the State of Arkansas pursuant to this section shall be used

by the State for purposes of fishery resources management, and

if it is used for any other purpose all right, title, and interest

in and to all property conveyed pursuant to this section shall

revert to the United States. The State of Arkansas shall ensure

that the property reverting to the United States is in substantially

the same or better condition as at the time of transfer.

Approved September 6, 1995.

Corning National

Fish Hatchery

Conveyance Act.

Sept. 6, 1995

[H.R. 535]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3093 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3093

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act and the Child 
Nutrition Act of 1966 to increase reimbursement rates of school meals, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 19, 2023

Mr. Heinrich (for himself, Mr. Fetterman, Mr. Warnock, Mrs. Gillibrand, 
Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Welch, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. 
Padilla, Mr. Reed, Ms. Hirono, and Mr. Booker) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act and the Child 
Nutrition Act of 1966 to increase reimbursement rates of school meals, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited ``Healthy Meals Help Kids Learn Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. INCREASING THE REIMBURSEMENT RATE OF SCHOOL MEALS.

    (a) School Lunch Increase.--Section 4(b) of the Richard B. Russell 
National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1753(b)) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``(4) Non-Performance-Based Additional Reimbursement.--
            ``(A) In general.--Beginning on July 1, 2024, each lunch 
        served in school food authorities shall receive an additional 
        45 cents.
            ``(B) Adjustment.--The amount in subparagraph (A) shall be 
        adjusted in accordance with section 11(a)(3) beginning on July 
        1, 2025.''.
    (b) School Breakfast Increase.--Section 4(b)(1) of the Child 
Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1773(b)(1)) is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``(F) Non-Performance-Based Additional Reimbursement.--
            ``(i) In general.--Beginning on July 1, 2024, each free 
        breakfast, reduced price breakfast, and breakfast served to 
        children not eligible for free or reduced price meals served in 
        school food authorities shall receive an additional 28 cents.
            ``(ii) Adjustment.--The amount in clause (i) shall be 
        adjusted in accordance with section 11(a)(3) of the Richard B. 
        Russell National School Lunch Act beginning on July 1, 2025 (42 
        U.S.C. 1759a(a)(3)).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Willie PRATT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-195.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 27, 1970.

Douglas M. Midgley, Public Defender, and William J. Nelson, Asst. Public Defender, Fort Myers, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

McNULTY, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of the denial of his motion filed pursuant to CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A. We affirm.

Appellant’s motion is a ten-page handwritten document alleging several grounds for relief, including one small paragraph as follows:

> “ * * * the defendant * * * told Assistant Public Defender * * * on the day of the defendant [sic] conviction, * * * that he the defendant wanted to appeal his Case and Assistant Public Defender, * * * told the Defendant that he, Assistant Public Defender * * would take care of the appeal * * * the Defendant have [sic] never talked to, or received any information concerning the appeal for the Defendant * * ”

None of the grounds relied upon form a sufficient predicate for relief under the aforesaid Rule 1.850, so the order denying said motion was proper. But the ground suggested in the quoted paragraph above, i. e., that appellant was wrongfully deprived *249of an orderly appeal, may be urged on a petition for habeas corpus.1

Accordingly, we pursue the course followed by our sister court in Jackson v. State, *supra,*and affirm without prejudice to the right of the appellant to file a petition for habeas corpus in this court, alleging sufficient grounds to warrant a full appellate review.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE, J., concur.

1

. *See*Baggett v. Wainwright (Fla.1969), 229 So.2d 239; and Jackson v. State (Fla.App.4th 1969), 227 So.2d 354.
**Exhibit  23.4**

 

May 14, 2012

**YPF S.A.**Macacha Guemes 515  (C1035AAC)  Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires  Argentina

| **Consent        of Independent Petroleum Engineers** |
|-------------------------------------------------------|

Gentlemen:

Ryder Scott Company, L.P.    hereby consents and authorizes the use and insertion by YPF S.A. of references    to our firm and to our report that set forth the results of our reserve estimations,    as of December 31, 2011, for YPF S.A.’s interest in the Vaca Muerta formation    in Argentina, in YPF S.A.’s annual report on Form 20-F and the F3 filing    for the year ended December 31, 2011.

|   | Very        truly yours,                                                                                                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                                                                                      |   |
|   | **RYDER        SCOTT COMPANY, L. P.**TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580                                                    |   |
|   |                                                                                                                      |   |
|   |                                                                                                                      |   |
|   | \s\        Herman G. Acuña                                                                                           |   |
|   |                                                                                                                      |   |
|   |                                                                                                                      |   |
|   | Herman        G. Acuña, P.E.        Texas P.E. License No. 92254        Managing Senior Vice President-International |   |

 

 

 

|   | 1015 4TH      STREET, S.W. SUITE 600  CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1J4                        | TEL      (403) 262-2799 |   | FAX      (403) 262-2790 |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |     621      17TH STREET, SUITE 1550  DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501 | TEL      (303) 623-9147 |   | FAX      (303) 623-4258 |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Derek
Schneideman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with
the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law.

                                        /s/ Derek Schneideman
                                        Derek Schneideman
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        August 20, 2007