Page 1 of 115

FLORIDA
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 2 of 115

Table of Contents

Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................... 2

Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................................................... 3

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 4

Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................. 5

Program Structure ................................................................................................................................................... 5

Program Administration...................................................................................................................................... 5

Program Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 8

Project Implementation ......................................................................................................................................... 16

Funds Programmed ........................................................................................................................................... 16

General Listing of Projects ............................................................................................................................... 19

Safety Performance ............................................................................................................................................... 29

General Highway Safety Trends ....................................................................................................................... 29

Safety Performance Targets .............................................................................................................................. 42

Applicability of Special Rules .......................................................................................................................... 46

Evaluation ............................................................................................................................................................. 48

Program Effectiveness ...................................................................................................................................... 48

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements ...................................................................... 49

Project Effectiveness ....................................................................................................................................... 107

Compliance Assessment ..................................................................................................................................... 108
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 3 of 115

Disclaimer 

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence 

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or 

data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section [HSIP], shall not be subject to discovery or 

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for 

damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or other data.” 

23 U.S.C. 409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data 

compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of 

potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings, pursuant to sections 

130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement 

project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or 

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for 

damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or data.” 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 4 of 115

Executive Summary 

Florida shares the national traffic safety vision, "Toward Zero Deaths," and formally adopted our own version 

of the national vision, "Driving Down Fatalities," in 2012. Between 2011 and 2015, 12,665 people died on 

Florida’s roadways and an additional 102,759 were seriously injured. The Florida Department of Transportation 

(FDOT) and its traffic safety partners are committed to eliminating fatalities and reducing serious injuries with 

the understanding that the death of any person is unacceptable. Understanding that zero fatalities cannot be 

reached within the Highway Safety Plan (HSP) 2018 year, Florida has developed data models to forecast the 

fatalities that are statistically expected to occur as we diligently strive to drive down fatalities and serious 

injuries with an ultimate vision of zero. [Source: SHSP, HSP] 

The Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is the statewide plan focusing on how to accomplish the vision of 

eliminating fatalities and reducing serious injuries on all public roads. The SHSP is updated at least every five 

years by FDOT in coordination with statewide, regional, and local traffic safety partners and was last updated in 

2016. [Source: HSP] 

Our data-driven SHSP focuses on 13 Emphasis Areas, which reflect ongoing and emerging highway safety 

issues in Florida. Key strategies related to each Emphasis Area are identified, as well as overarching strategies 

that apply across Emphasis Areas. These strategies align with the "4 Es" - engineering, education, enforcement, 

and emergency response. The SHSP also defines a framework for implementation activities to be carried out 

through strategic safety coalitions and specific activities by FDOT, other State agencies, metropolitan planning 

organizations, local governments, and other traffic safety partners. [Source: HSP] 

FDOT received an allocation of about $120 million in Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds 

during the 2016 state fiscal year from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017 (see Question 23) and used it to 

complete 201 projects (see Question 29). The Intersection program completed 87 projects with about $46 

million (see Question 29). The Lane Departure program completed 56 projects with about $36 million (see 

Question 29). The Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety program completed 14 projects with about $4 million (see 

Question 29). Multiple programs and SHSP emphasis areas were addressed by 42 projects with about $31 

million (see Question 29). 

Regarding roadway ownership, state-maintained roadways were addressed by 139 projects using about $106 million in 

HSIP funds. Local roadways were addressed by 49 projects using about $10 million in HSIP funds (see Question 29). Noninfrastructure was supported with 22 projects using about $11 million in HSIP funds (see Question 29).
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 5 of 115

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of achieving 

a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 148(h) and 23 CFR 

924.15, States are required to report annually on the progress being made to advance HSIP implementation and 

evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the HSIP Reporting Guidance dated December 

29, 2016 and consists of five sections: program structure, progress in implementing highway safety 

improvement projects, progress in achieving safety outcomes and performance targets, effectiveness of the 

improvements and compliance assessment.

Program Structure

Program Administration

Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. 

The general structure of the HSIP in Florida is that the program is managed in Central Office with district staff 

performing project activities such as conducting safety studies, project scoping, public involvement, and 

coordinating with production staff on programming safety projects. 

To be eligible for HSIP funds, all safety improvement projects must address a Strategic Highway Safety Plan 

(SHSP) emphasis area, be identified through a data-driven process, and contribute to a reduction in fatalities and 

serious injuries. 

HSIP projects are conducted on state maintained and local maintained roads. For HSIP projects on locally 

maintained roads an application must be coordinated and concurred with local maintaining agencies. Projects 

should not require additional Right of Way, because of added time to project schedules. The scope of work must 

be well defined prior to programming. 

All projects must be able to be constructed, feasible, and cost effective. Field reviews and documentation are 

necessary. Coordination with Local Agency Program (LAP) Administrator and the Florida Department of 

Transportation (FDOT) State Safety Office is essential throughout the project schedule for projects on locally 

maintained roads. Deviations from the identified scope of work when programmed will need to be approved by 

the FDOT State Safety Office.

Each application for local projects shall include the cover letter signed by the highest elected official of the local 

public agency (county, city or town) that owns or maintains the public road(s) where the proposed infrastructure 

project will be constructed. The application cover letter shall document through representative’s signature that 

the project has been reviewed (concurrence not required) by the following the Metropolitan Planning 

Organization (MPO) and the Community Traffic Safety Team (CTST).

The application itself should have several elements - (1) project location and description, (2) problem 

description, (3) previous safety improvements, (4) SHSP emphasis area and proposed improvements, (5) 

roadway characteristics, (6) traffic data, (7) crash information, (8) infrastructure impacts, and (9) a summary. 

The summary should include cost, schedule, benefit-cost analysis, and net present value (NPV).
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 6 of 115

[Source: 2017 HSIP Call for Candidate Safety Projects] 

Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? 

 Other-Engineering and Operations, State Safety Office

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The FDOT HSIP staff primarily includes 2 people in Central Office that directly report to the Chief Safety 

Officer for the State Safety Office. District staff that support the HSIP include the District Safety Engineer who 

directly report to the District Traffic Operations Engineer. 

How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? 

Other-Central Office

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Administration of HSIP Funds are handled out of the Central Office, State Safety Office and are allocated based 

on data based needs.

Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP.

Due to changes in the Florida Traffic Crash Report, Long Form, the State Safety Office (SSO) was unable to 

develop a high crash location list for local roads during the reporting period. However, the SSO supported the 

districts with identifying high crash locations on local roads through Geographic Information Systems 

(GIS) analysis. The SSO developed several analyses of pedestrian and bicyclist involved crashes and 

intersection crashes. The department is working towards developing a replacement system that will once 

again provide high crash listings on local roads. 

Additionally, other local projects are identified through a coordinated effort with the District Safety Engineer 

and the Community Traffic Safety Teams. 

Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) Bureaus, Divisions) 

are involved with HSIP planning.

Traffic Engineering/Safety

Design

Planning 

Operations 

Districts/Regions

Local Aid Programs Office/Division

Governors Highway Safety Office 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 7 of 115

The Florida Highway Safety Plan (HSP) and the HSIP are both managed and maintained through the FDOT 

State Safety Office (SSO) which assists with coordination efforts such as planning with the Governors Highway 

Safety Office. 

Describe coordination with internal partners.

District staff coordinate with planning, design, and operations for planning HSIP projects. Central Office staff 

then coordinates with District staff on programming and funding projects. District staff look at opportunities to 

program HSIP project components concurrently with other projects in the Department's work program. 

Other HSIP planning activites include efforts with the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). Special emphasis 

areas teams have been formed based on the SHSP structure. Each team is made up of key personnel within the 

department and from other agencies or groups which have an interest or responsibility in the emphasis area. The 

teams meet to develop goals, objectives and action items using the SHSP as the guiding principle. Quarterly 

meetings are held to discuss progress on action items, plan new work and share best practices. 

Additionally, the following groups are included in the internal coordination of the HSIP program: Bike and 

Pedestrian Safety Manager, State Safety Office, Safe Routes to School Program, Local Agency Program and 

Work Program Office. 

 

Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning.

Regional Planning Organizations (e.g. MPOs, RPOs, COGs) 

Governors Highway Safety Office 

Local Technical Assistance Program

Local Government Agency 

Tribal Agency

Law Enforcement Agency 

Academia/University

FHWA

Other-Community Traffic Safety Team (CTST)

Other-FACERS

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Describe coordination with external partners.

FDOT has the benefit of the expertise and experience of several additional partners throughout the HSP 

planning process. Input on safety priorities and activities comes from traffic safety coalitions, advocates, FDOT 

District Traffic Safety Engineers, law enforcement officers and their leadership, emergency responders, judges, 

Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), Students Against Destructive Decisions (SADD), and many other 

state and local agencies. Florida’s Community Traffic Safety Teams (CTSTs) also provide consistent input into 

the highway safety planning process. CTSTs are locally based groups of highway safety advocates that are 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 8 of 115

committed to solving traffic safety problems through a comprehensive, multi-jurisdictional, multi-disciplinary 

approach. Members include city, county, state, and occasionally Federal agencies, as well as private industry 

representatives and local citizens. Community boundaries are determined by the organizations comprising a 

CTST: a city, an entire county, a portion of a county, multiple counties, or some other jurisdictional 

arrangement may be the basis for a CTST.

Through the combination of these efforts there are literally thousands of partners that work in concert with 

FDOT toward the goal of a fatality-free roadway system.

[Source: FDOT Highway Safety Plan]

Have any program administration practices used to implement the HSIP changed since the last reporting 

period?

No

Are there any other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to elaborate?

Yes

Describe other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to elaborate. 

The HSIP program is centrally managed for both funding and administration of the program. Each district is 

responsible for submitting projects for funding consideration annually. The State Safety Office reviews district 

submitted projects annually and determines funding based on a need addressed in the Florida Strategic Highway 

Safety Plan, project priorities and the Net Present Value (NPV) of an individual project. 

Program Methodology

Does the State have an HSIP manual or similar that clearly describes HSIP planning, implementation 

and evaluation processes?

Yes

To upload a copy of the State processes, attach files below.

File Name:

FL HSIP Guideline 1991.pdf

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP.

Intersection

Bicycle Safety

Skid Hazard

Pedestrian Safety

Other-Lane Departure
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 9 of 115

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Program: Bicycle Safety 

Date of Program Methodology: 4/20/2017 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area 

FHWA focused approach to safety

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Population 

Roadway 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Other-Projects are identified using GIS analysis of crash locations and frequency. 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process 

Other-Locations are identified through GIS analysis by Central Office or vetted through the districts. District 

submitted projects are evaluated using a Benefit Cost Ratio greater than 1.

Other-Contributing factors such as time of day (75% of fatal pedestrian and bicycle crashes occur during dusk 

or dark hours) 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 10 of 115

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Cost Effectiveness : 1

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Program: Intersection 

Date of Program Methodology: 9/1/2007 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area 

FHWA focused approach to safety

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Traffic Other-Mile Point 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

No

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 11 of 115

The same overall process is used, excluding traffic volume data and crash rates. 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Other-Districts coordinate with staff for projects and submit to Central Office for approval.

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Program: Pedestrian Safety 

Date of Program Methodology: 4/20/2017 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area 

FHWA focused approach to safety

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Population 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Other-Projects are identified using GIS analysis of crash locations and frequency. 

Other-Contributing factors such as time of day (75% of fatal pedestrian and bicycle crashes occur during dusk 

or dark hours) 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 12 of 115

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

The same overall process is used, excluding traffic volume data and crash rates. 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Competitive application process 

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Cost Effectiveness : 1

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

State and local roads are included in this program. Funding is provided for the top 20 priority counties. The 

allocation is based on the percentage of the problem. 

Program: Skid Hazard 

Date of Program Methodology: 9/1/2007 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area 

FHWA focused approach to safety

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Traffic Other-Friction Number 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 13 of 115

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Other-Locations with a high proportion of wet weather crashes are included in the screening process for skid 

hazard project locations. 

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

The same overall process is used, excluding traffic volume data and crash rates. 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Program: Other-Lane Departure 

Date of Program Methodology: 9/1/2007 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area 

FHWA focused approach to safety

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 14 of 115

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Traffic Other-Mile Point 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Crash frequency

Crash rate

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

No

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

The same overall process is used, excluding traffic volume data and crash rates. 

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Other-Districts coordinate with staff for projects and submit to Central Office for approval.

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

What percentage of HSIP funds address systemic improvements?

 3 

 HSIP funds are used to address which of the following systemic improvements? Please check all that 

apply.

Add/Upgrade/Modify/Remove Traffic Signal 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? [Check all that apply]
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 15 of 115

Engineering Study 

Road Safety Assessment

Stakeholder input 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Does the State HSIP consider connected vehicles and ITS technologies? 

No

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Does the State use the Highway Safety Manual to support HSIP efforts?

Yes

Please describe how the State uses the HSM to support HSIP efforts.

The Highway Safety Manual is in the early implementation efforts within the HSIP.

Have any program methodology practices used to implement the HSIP changed since the last reporting 

period?

No

Are there any other aspects of the HSIP methodology on which the State would like to elaborate?

No
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 16 of 115

Project Implementation

Funds Programmed

Reporting period for HSIP funding.

State Fiscal Year

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

No additional comments regarding the HSIP funding reporting period. 

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category.

FUNDING CATEGORY PROGRAMMED OBLIGATED % OBLIGATED/PROGRAMMED

HSIP (23 U.S.C. 148) $120,647,231 $120,114,010 99.56%

HRRR Special Rule (23 U.S.C. 

148(g)(1))

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 154) $0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 164) $0 $0 0%

RHCP (for HSIP purposes) (23 

U.S.C. 130(e)(2))

$0 $0 0%

Other Federal-aid Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

$0 $0 0%

State and Local Funds $0 $0 0%

Totals $120,647,231 $120,114,010 99.56%

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

[Source: FDOT MADDOG]

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) or tribal safety projects?

$10,396,655 

How much funding is obligated to local or tribal safety projects?

$10,395,638 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Reported figures are based on programmed and obligated HSIP funds for "off state highway" and "off federal" 

systems.
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 17 of 115

[Source: FDOT MADDOG]

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$17,096,283 

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$16,961,536 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Reported figures are based on programmed and obligated HSIP funds for work mix descriptions of "preliminary 

engineering", "public information/education", "traffic engineering study", "transportation planning", and 

"transportation statistics".

[Source: FDOT MADDOG]

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas during the reporting 

period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

$0 

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during the reporting 

period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

$139,529 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

FDOT transferred HSIP funds during the state fiscal year 2016/2017 to enhance safety for school crossing zones through 

the Safe Routes to School program and to enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety through Florida’s Pedestrian and 

Bicycle Safety Coalition.

[Source: FDOT MADDOG]

Discuss impediments to obligating HSIP funds and plans to overcome this challenge in the future.

None to report at this time.

[Source: FDOT State Safety Engineer]
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 18 of 115

Does the State want to elaborate on any other aspects of it’s progress in implementing HSIP projects?

No
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 19 of 115

General Listing of Projects

List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period.

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

190258-1 Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

$597883 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

192203-1 Non-infrastructure $171675 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Data

211079-2 Non-infrastructure $339514 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

211079-3 Non-infrastructure $395544 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

211079-4 Non-infrastructure $294203 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

211079-5 Non-infrastructure $405389 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

211079-6 Non-infrastructure $120098 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

211079-8 Non-infrastructure $512932 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

220838-2 $5211 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Multiple

222518-1 Lighting $894313 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

222524-1 Lighting $1247357 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

222668-1 Lighting $1040315 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

222713-1 Lighting $966714 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

222818-1 Lighting $954187 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

230094-6 Non-infrastructure $800000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

230094-7 Non-infrastructure $798000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

237995-1 Non-infrastructure $429645 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

254553-1 Non-infrastructure $2876463 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

254646-1 $224868 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 20 of 115

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

254647-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$463976 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrian and 

Bicyclist Safety

254677-2 $4922576 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

409224-1 Non-infrastructure $179410 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

412479-3 Intersection 

geometry

$3248849 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

418439-1 Non-infrastructure $700340 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

418860-5 Intersection 

geometry

$45301 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

422814-1 $1803092 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

423071-1 Intersection 

geometry

$223199 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

423608-2 Intersection 

geometry

$2442708 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

425646-2 Speed 

management

$249578 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Intersections

425646-3 Non-infrastructure $23791 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Multiple

427004-2 Intersection 

geometry

$9113 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

427280-1 Intersection 

geometry

$2678907 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

427315-2 Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

$3382824 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

427452-1 Lighting $25854 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

428214-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$131 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Pedestrians

428724-1 Roadway $278501 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

428732-1 Roadway $55954 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

429014-1 Intersection 

geometry

$12145 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

429020-1 $345 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

429060-1 Roadway $357590 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 21 of 115

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

429060-2 Intersection 

geometry

$710077 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

429135-2 Intersection traffic 

control

$30099 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

429246-2 Shoulder 

treatments

$13012 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

429343-2 Intersection traffic 

control

$13216 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

429346-2 Lighting $693241 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

429496-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$24432 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

429506-1 Lighting $457164 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

429650-2 Lighting $300000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Multiple

429660-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$1620 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Pedestrian and 

Bicyclist Safety

429664-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$78240 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Pedestrian and 

Bicyclist Safety

429670-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$466 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

429670-2 Shoulder 

treatments

$511 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

429670-4 Shoulder 

treatments

$7779 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

429675-2 Roadway 

delineation

$358 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

429678-2 Shoulder 

treatments

$332 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

429741-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$13309 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

429742-1 Lighting $6412 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

430687-3 Shoulder 

treatments

$1 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

430765-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$31509 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

430768-1 Intersection 

geometry

$150188 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

430777-1 Roadway $211090 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 22 of 115

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

430785-1 Roadway $718182 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

430803-1 Roadway $162254 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

430808-1 Intersection 

geometry

$598393 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

430808-2 Intersection traffic 

control

$82428 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

430852-1 Non-infrastructure $352351 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Multiple

430855-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$728615 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrians

430910-1 Intersection 

geometry

$7955030 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

430911-1 Intersection 

geometry

$618933 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

430914-1 Intersection 

geometry

$5982164 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

430931-1 Lighting $11077 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

431142-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$203 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

431170-4 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$414343 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

431172-1 Roadway $67576 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

431243-1 Roadway $20408 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

431496-1 Roadway $497064 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

431635-1 $988206 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

431820-2 $2394435 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

431820-3 $37152 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

432193-1 Roadway $11000001 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

432412-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$365550 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

432421-1 Intersection 

geometry

$587201 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 23 of 115

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

432586-1 Roadway $1890731 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

432647-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$36021 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

432647-2 Shoulder 

treatments

$3281039 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

432648-1 Intersection 

geometry

$139838 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

432654-1 Roadway 

delineation

$504754 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

432655-1 Roadway 

delineation

$758501 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

432656-1 Intersection 

geometry

$2621913 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway

Agency

Intersections

432657-1 $984489 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

432659-1 Lighting $879471 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

432743-5 Intersection 

geometry

$579113 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

432755-1 Lighting $4199562 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

432952-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$240584 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Pedestrian and 

Bicyclist Safety

433040-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$8930 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433059-2 Access 

management

$38858 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433074-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$7 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Pedestrian and 

Bicyclist Safety

433107-1 $7 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

433111-1 $29493 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

433144-1 $4500000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

433206-1 Intersection 

geometry

$289054 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

433264-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$1194103 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433266-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$559630 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 24 of 115

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

433283-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$1245142 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433375-1 Lighting $11942 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

433390-1 Non-infrastructure $357547 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Multiple

433391-2 Non-infrastructure $742404 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Multiple

433396-1 Lighting $9709 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433408-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$1315 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433409-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$38265 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433412-1 $2922882 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

433416-1 $787534 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

433436-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$484 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

433438-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$3474 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

433451-1 Access 

management

$553987 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433454-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$74964 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

433485-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$70688 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433489-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$12344 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433490-1 Access 

management

$620651 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433491-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$216158 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433492-1 Access 

management

$1183685 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433493-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$672483 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433508-1 Lighting $505661 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

433519-2 Intersection traffic 

control

$352338 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 25 of 115

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

433519-3 Intersection traffic 

control

$12834 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433522-1 Non-infrastructure $162910 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

433522-3 Non-infrastructure $1000000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Data

433786-1 Roadway $1465 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

433787-1 Intersection 

geometry

$1942 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

433875-1 Non-infrastructure $133992 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Intersections

434307-1 $629 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

434308-1 $2816 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

434314-1 Roadway 

delineation

$304171 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

434315-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$410301 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

434327-1 Lighting $159819 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

434328-1 Lighting $121972 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

434337-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$148132 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434340-1 Lighting $22576 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

434342-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$54755 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

434425-1 Access 

management

$5772 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

434488-1 Speed 

management

$351963 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434489-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$88100 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Pedestrian and 

Bicyclist Safety

434502-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$362897 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

434505-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$135180 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434506-1 Lighting $106659 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 26 of 115

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

434507-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$20954 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434509-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$39996 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434510-1 Roadway

delineation

$129749 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

434534-2 Lighting $36739 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434694-1 Intersection 

geometry

$7651 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434701-1 Roadway 

delineation

$308159 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

434728-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$218425 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434778-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$9808 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434779-1 Non-infrastructure $349326 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

434809-1 Lighting $6881 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

434810-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$164588 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

434844-1 Intersection 

geometry

$300 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

435091-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$463618 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

435093-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$278824 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

435095-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$38044 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

435096-1 Lighting $369975 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

435122-1 Intersection 

geometry

$1520517 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

435255-1 Intersection 

geometry

$812 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

435837-1 Intersection 

geometry

$29363 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

436009-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$498893 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

436012-1 Intersection 

geometry

$4896 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 27 of 115

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

436013-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$395522 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Pedestrian and 

Bicyclist Safety

436013-2 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$278311 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Pedestrian and 

Bicyclist Safety

436023-1 Lighting $916642 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrian and 

Bicyclist Safety

436033-1 Roadway 

delineation

$94904 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

436114-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$356833 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrian and 

Bicyclist Safety

436118-1 Access 

management

$625666 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

436119-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$234690 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

436124-1 Lighting $138003 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

436134-1 Roadway 

delineation

$99973 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

436135-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$433939 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrian and 

Bicyclist Safety

436149-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$164000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

436151-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$102674 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

436185-1 Shoulder 

treatments

$98874 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Lane Departure

436235-1 Roadway 

delineation

$98856 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

436236-1 Roadway $60693 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

436237-1 Intersection 

geometry

$589857 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

436300-1 $24940 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Multiple

436310-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$198359 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

436311-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$194221 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

436313-1 Speed 

management

$226875 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Multiple

436356-1 Roadway 

delineation

$99999 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 28 of 115

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE SELECTION

EMPHASIS AREA STRATEGY

436364-1 Roadway 

delineation

$100249 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

436371-1 Roadway 

delineation

$90533 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Lane Departure

436385-1 Lighting $214840 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

436404-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$383578 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

436546-1 Intersection traffic 

control

$45318 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

436548-1 Roadway 

delineation

$81770 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Lane Departure

436553-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$282217 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Intersections

436613-1 Non-infrastructure $298357 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Multiple

436965-1 Intersection 

geometry

$33184 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Intersections

437263-1 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

$738913 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Pedestrian and 

Bicyclist Safety

437451-1 Intersection 

geometry

$6464 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

437630-1 Lighting $487432 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

437634-1 Intersection 

geometry

$15416 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 State Highway 

Agency

Intersections

437647-1 $198120 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

0 Other Local 

Agency

Multiple

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

[Source: FDOT MADDOG and FDOT State Safety Office]
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 29 of 115

Safety Performance

General Highway Safety Trends

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the State for the past five years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Fatalities 3,215 2,985 2,564 2,461 2,400 2,430 2,402 2,494 2,939

Serious Injuries 25,725 23,776 22,755 21,503 20,042 20,028 20,226 20,912 21,551

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 1.565 1.504 1.305 1.257 1.251 1.273 1.246 1.241 1.422

Serious injury rate (per 

HMVMT)

12.523 11.978 11.586 10.985 10.444 10.491 10.496 10.404 10.426

Number non-motorized 

fatalities

650 624 587 583 617 589 633 741 785

Number of non-motorized 

serious injuries

2,459 2,521 2,391 2,415 2,206 2,620 2,514 2,563 2,596
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 30 of 115

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Annual Fatalities

Fatalities 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Annual Serious Injuries

Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 31 of 115

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Fatality rate (per HMVMT)

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 32 of 115

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The number of fatal and serious injuries come from the Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan 

(SHSP) published October 2016. The SHSP injury counts are based on the Florida Department of Highway 

Safety and Motor Vehicles (DHSMV) database for traffic crash reports using Florida's Integrated Report 

Exchange System (FIRES). DHSMV is the official custodian of traffic crash records for the State of Florida. 

The numbers for Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) come from the FDOT Transportation Data and Analytics 

Office.

[Source: FDOT SHSP; DHSMV FIRES; FDOT Transportation Data and Analytics Office]

Describe fatality data source.

State Motor Vehicle Crash Database

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (DHSMV) is the official custodian of traffic 

crash reports. Therefore the DHSMV database is the official crash records database for the State of Florida. 

Additionally traffic crash statistics reported by DHSMV are official for the State of Florida.

To the maximum extent possible, present this data by functional classification and ownership.

Year 2015

2500

2600

2700

2800

2900

3000

3100

3200

3300

3400

3500

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Non Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Fatalities and Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 33 of 115

Functional Classification Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Principal Arterial -

Interstate

96.2 425.8 1.03 5.01

Rural Principal Arterial -

Other Freeways and 

Expressways

117.8 579.6 1.83 8.98

Rural Principal Arterial -

Other

188 634.5 2.59 8.73

Rural Minor Arterial 78.4 359 2.67 12.23

Rural Minor Collector 1 0 0.36 0

Rural Major Collector 8 43.8 1.05 5.76

Rural Local Road or Street 435.5 110.5 921.64 233.85

Urban Principal Arterial -

Interstate

177.2 1,237.2 0.68 4.72

Urban Principal Arterial -

Other Freeways and 

Expressways

76.8 426.4 0.64 3.56

Urban Principal Arterial -

Other

693.8 5,676 1.92 15.74

Urban Minor Arterial 209 1,736 1.67 13.84

Urban Minor Collector 0.5 1.5 0.24 0.71

Urban Major Collector 11 82.6 0.49 3.75

Urban Local Road or Street 614.5 116 186.24 35.16
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 34 of 115

Year 2015

Roadways Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

State Highway Agency 1,550.2 13,665.6 1.01 8.92

County Highway Agency

Town or Township 

Highway Agency

City of Municipal Highway 

Agency

State Park, Forest, or 

Reservation Agency

Local Park, Forest or 

Reservation Agency

Other State Agency

Other Local Agency

Private (Other than 

Railroad)

Railroad

State Toll Authority

Local Toll Authority

Other Public 

Instrumentality (e.g. 

Airport, School, University)

Indian Tribe Nation

Local Roads 839.4 9,791.2 1.93 22.46
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 35 of 115

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities by Functional Classification 

5 Year Average

2007-2011 2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 36 of 115

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries by Functional 

Classification 

5 Year Average

2007-2011 2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 37 of 115

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) by Functional 

Classification 

5 Year Average

2007-2011 2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 38 of 115

0

50

100

150

200

250

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) by Functional 

Classification 

5 Year Average

2007-2011 2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 39 of 115

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

State Highway Agency Local Roads Local Roads

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities by Roadway Ownership 

5 Year Average

2007-2011 2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 40 of 115

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

State Highway Agency Local Roads Local Roads

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries by Roadway 

Ownership 

5 Year Average

2007-2011 2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 41 of 115

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

State Highway Agency Local Roads Local Roads

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) by Roadway 

Ownership 

5 Year Average

2007-2011 2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 42 of 115

0

5

10

15

20

25

State Highway Agency Local Roads Local Roads

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) by Roadway 

Ownership 

5 Year Average

2007-2011 2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

[Source: FDOT Crash Analysis Reporting (CAR) System]

Are there any other aspects of the general highway safety trends on which the State would like to 

elaborate?

No

Safety Performance Targets

Safety Performance Targets

Calendar Year 2018 Targets * 

Number of Fatalities 0.1 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for total fatalities on 

Florida’s roads is forecast to be between 2,716 and 3,052 in 2018. This forecast was 

made by combining FARS data with current state data from 2009 to 2016 to predict 

probable outcomes for 2017 and 2018. Florida’s target for fatalities is zero in 2018. 

While the data forecast indicates Florida’s five year rolling average for fatalities could 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 43 of 115

continue to trend upward in 2017 and 2018, the FDOT State Safety Office expects the 

projects chosen for funding will mitigate the data forecast and ultimately reduce the 

number of traffic fatalities. An interim performance measure is required by our federal 

funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly believe that every life 

counts and although our target for fatalities is zero in 2018, Florida has forecast an 

interim performance measure of 3,052 in order to satisfy the federal requirement. 

Number of Serious Injuries 0.1 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for total serious injuries 

on Florida’s roads is forecast to be between 18,831 and 20,861 in 2018. This forecast 

was made by combining FARS data with current state data from 2009 to 2016 to 

predict probable outcomes for 2017 and 2018. Florida’s target for serious injuries is 

zero in 2018. The data forecast indicates Florida’s five year rolling average for serious 

injuries could continue to trend downward in 2017 and 2018. The FDOT State Safety 

Office expects the projects chosen for funding will enhance this downward trend in the 

number of serious injuries on Florida’s roads. An interim performance measure is 

required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly 

believe that every life counts and although our target for serious injuries is zero in 

2018, Florida has forecast an interim performance measure of 20,861 in order to 

satisfy the federal requirement. 

Fatality Rate 0.100 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for fatality rate per 100 

million VMT on Florida’s roads is forecast to be between 1.06 and 1.65 in 2018. This 

forecast was made by combining FARS data with current state data from 2009 to 2016 

to predict probable outcomes for 2017 and 2018. Florida’s target for fatality rate per 

100 million VMT is zero in 2018. While the data forecast indicates Florida’s five year 

rolling average for fatality rate per 100 million VMT could continue to trend upward 

in 2017 and 2018, the FDOT State Safety Office expects the projects chosen for 

funding will mitigate the data forecast and ultimately reduce the number of traffic 

fatalities. An interim performance measure is required by our federal funding agencies 

in order to receive federal funding. We firmly believe that every life counts and 

although our target for fatality rate per 100 million VMT is zero in 2018, Florida has 

forecast an interim performance measure of 1.65 in order to satisfy the federal 

requirement. 

Serious Injury Rate 0.100 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for serious injury rate per 

100 million VMT on Florida’s roads is forecast to be between 7.57 and 11.06 in 2018. 

This forecast was made by combining FARS data with current state data from 2009 to 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 44 of 115

2016 to predict probable outcomes for 2017 and 2018. Florida’s target for serious 

injury rate per 100 million VMT is zero in 2018. The data forecast indicates Florida’s 

five year rolling average for serious injury rate per 100 million VMT could continue to 

trend downward in 2017 and 2018. The FDOT State Safety Office expects the projects 

chosen for funding will enhance this downward trend in the serious injury rate per 100 

million VMT. An interim performance measure is required by our federal funding 

agencies in order to receive federal funding. We firmly believe that every life counts 

and although our target for serious injury rate per 100 million VMT is zero in 2018, 

Florida has forecast an interim performance measure of 11.06 in order to satisfy the 

federal requirement. 

Total Number of Non-Motorized 0.1 Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

Based on statistical forecasting, the five year rolling average for non-motorized 

fatalities and serious injuries on Florida’s roads is forecast to be between 3,066 and 

3,447 in 2018. This forecast was made by combining FARS data with current state 

data from 2009 to 2016 to predict probable outcomes for 2017 and 2018. Florida’s 

target for non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries is zero in 2018. The data 

forecast indicates Florida’s five year rolling average for non-motorized fatalities and 

serious injuries could continue to trend downward in 2017 and 2018. The FDOT State 

Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will enhance this downward 

trend in non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries. An interim performance measure 

is required by our federal funding agencies in order to receive federal funding. We 

firmly believe that every life counts and although our target for non-motorized 

fatalities and serious injuries is zero in 2018, Florida has forecast an interim 

performance measure of 3,447 in order to satisfy the federal requirement. 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Florida shares the national traffic safety vision, “Toward Zero Deaths,” and formally adopted our own version 

of the national vision, “Driving Down Fatalities,” in 2012. FDOT and its traffic safety partners are committed to 

eliminating fatalities and reducing serious injuries with the understanding that the death of any person is 

unacceptable and based on that, zero deaths is our safety performance target. This target is consistent 

throughout our Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety 

Plan.

Florida’s data forecasts have been established using an ARIMA Hybrid Regression Model (0, 1,1)(2,0,0)(12) 

with VMT. Nine independent variables were tested to assess correlations; only Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) 

and gas consumption have relatively high correlations with fatalities and serious injuries and of these two 

variables only VMT was useful in predicting future fatalities and serious injuries. The first three performance 

measures (number of fatalities, number of serious injuries, and fatality rate per 100M VMT) have been 

forecasted based on a five year rolling average and the remaining performance measures will be forecasted 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 45 of 115

annually. The forecasts for 2017 and 2018 are based on monthly data from 2005 through 2016 using statistical 

forecasting methodologies. 

 

[Source: FDOT Highway Safety Plan]

 

Describe efforts to coordinate with other stakeholders (e.g. MPOs, SHSO) to establish safety performance 

targets. 

The 2016 Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) was updated through collaboration with Florida’s traffic safety 

partners. It is aligned with and builds on the recently adopted Florida Transportation Plan (FTP), the State’s 

long-range transportation plan. Both the FTP and the SHSP share the vision of a fatality-free roadway system to 

protect Florida’s 20 million residents and more than 105 million annual visitors. 

On August 22, 2016, the SHSP's signatory partners met in Tallahassee to pledge their support for the 

implementation of the five-year plan. Partners that reviewed and approved the plan include: 

• Florida Department of Transportation 

• Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 

• Florida Highway Patrol 

• Florida Sheriffs Association 

• Florida Police Chiefs Association

• Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council 

• Florida Rail Enterprise

• Florida Association of County Engineers and Road Superintendents 

• Federal Highway Administration

• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

• Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

Florida shares the national traffic safety vision, “Toward Zero Deaths,” and formally adopted our own version 

of the national vision, “Driving Down Fatalities,” in 2012. FDOT and its traffic safety partners are committed to 

eliminating fatalities and reducing serious injuries with the understanding that the death of any person is 

unacceptable and based on that, zero deaths is our safety performance target. This target is consistent 

throughout our Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety 

Plan.

[Source: FDOT Highway Safety Plan]

Does the State want to report additional optional targets? 

No

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 46 of 115

Applicability of Special Rules

Does the HRRR special rule apply to the State for this reporting period? 

No

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

No reported HRRR funding.

[Source: FDOT MADDOG]

Provide the number of older driver and pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries for the past seven years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number of Older Driver and 

Pedestrian Fatalities

388 439 389 419 409 433 444

Number of Older Driver and 

Pedestrian Serious Injuries

2,421 2,345 2,355 2,377 2,402 2,592 2,702

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

# of Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Years

Number of Older Driver and Pedestrian Fatalities and Serious Injuries by 

Year.

Fatalities Serious Injuries
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 47 of 115

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

[Source: FIRES (Florida's Integrated Report Exchange System) as of 8/21/2017]
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 48 of 115

Evaluation

Program Effectiveness

How does the State measure effectiveness of the HSIP?

Change in fatalities and serious injuries

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Based on the measures of effectiveness selected previously, describe the results of the State's program 

level evaluations.

OVERALL

FDOT administers programs for lane departure, intersections, and non-motorists (i.e. bicyclists and pedestrians) under the Highway Safety 

Improvement Program (HSIP). Based on statistical forecasting total fatalities on Florida’s roads could trend upward for 2017 and 2018 (see 

Question 34), total serious injuries could trend downward for 2017 and 2018 (see Question 34), the fatalities rate per 100 million vehicle miles 

could trend upward for 2017 and 2018 (see Question 34), and serious injuries rate per 100 million vehicle miles could trend downward for 2017 

and 2018 (see Question 34).

LANE DEPARTURE

The five year rolling average of traffic fatalities attributed to lane departure continues to trend upward (see Question 43). The five year rolling 

average of serious injuries attributed to lane departure continues to trend downward (see Question 43). The five year rolling average for fatalities 

rate per 100 million vehicle miles attributed to lane departure continues to trend upward (see Question 43). The five year rolling average for 

serious injuries rate per 100 million vehicle miles attributed to lane departure continues to trend downward (see Question 43). The FDOT State 

Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will mitigate the upward trends related to fatalities and enhance the downward trends 

related to serious injuries attributed to lane departure on Florida’s roads.

INTERSECTIONS

The five year rolling average of traffic fatalities attributed to intersections continues to trend upward (see Question 43). The five year rolling 

average of serious injuries attributed to intersections continues to trend downward (see Question 43). The five year rolling average for fatalities 

rate per 100 million vehicle miles attributed to intersections continues to trend upward (see Question 43). The five year rolling average for serious 

injuries rate per 100 million vehicle miles attributed to intersections continues to trend downward (see Question 43). The FDOT State Safety Office 

expects the projects chosen for funding will mitigate the upward trends related to fatalities and enhance the downward trends related to serious 

injuries attributed to intersections on Florida’s roads.

NON-MOTORISTS (I.E. BICYCLISTS AND PEDESTRIANS)

The five year rolling average of traffic fatalities attributed to non-motorists (i.e. bicyclists and pedestrians) continues to trend upward (see Question 

43). The five year rolling average of serious injuries attributed to non-motorists is down from last year and the overall trend is relatively flat (see 

Question 43). The five year rolling average for fatalities rate per 100 million vehicle miles attributed to non-motorists continues to gradually trend 

upward (see Question 43). The five year rolling average for serious injuries rate per 100 million vehicle miles attributed to non-motorists continues 

to gradually trend upward (see Question 43). The FDOT State Safety Office expects the projects chosen for funding will mitigate the gradual upward 

trends related to fatalities and serious injuries attributed to non-motorists on Florida’s roads.

What other indicators of success does the State use to demonstrate effectiveness and success of the 

Highway Safety Improvement Program?

Other-Reduction in fatalities and serious injuries
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 49 of 115

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Are there any significant programmatic changes that have occurred since the last reporting period? 

No

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements

Present and describe trends in SHSP emphasis area performance measures.

Year 2015

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted 

Crash Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality 

Rate

(per 

HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious 

Injury Rate

(per 

HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Other 1 Other 2 Other 3

Lane Departure 1,188 6,855.2 0.6 3.52

Intersections 610.6 6,836.6 0.31 3.48

Pedestrians and Bicyclists 673 2,499.8 0.34 1.27
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 50 of 115

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Lane Departure Intersections Pedestrians and Bicyclists

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities 

5 Year Average

2007-2011 2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

Lane Departure Intersections Pedestrians and Bicyclists

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries 

5 Year Average

2007-2011 2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 51 of 115

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The number of fatal and serious injuries for years 2011 through 2015 are from the Florida Strategic Highway 

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

Lane Departure Intersections Pedestrians and Bicyclists

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2007-2011 2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Lane Departure Intersections Pedestrians and Bicyclists

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2007-2011 2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 52 of 115

Safety Plan (SHSP). The SHSP injury counts are based on the Florida Department of Highway Safety 

(DHSMV) database called the Florida Integrated Report Exchange System (FIRES).

[Source: FDOT SHSP; DHSMV FIRES]

The number of fatal and serious injuries for 2010 and prior are from the FDOT Crash Analysis Reporting 

(CAR) system.

[Source: FDOT Crash Analysis Reporting (CAR) system]

The definition of intersection-related crashes and lane departure crashes changed around 2012.

[Source: FDOT State Safety Office staff]

Has the State completed any countermeasure effectiveness evaluations during the reporting period?

Yes

Please provide the following summary information for each countermeasure effectiveness evaluation. 

CounterMeasures: New signal at channelized intersection 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 43 

Number of 

Installations: 43 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

16 32 26 -4 19 7 14 17 -63 54 23 39 11 -

10 23 -96 -21 17

Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: New signal at non-channelized intersection 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 53 of 115

Number of 

Installations: 14 

Number of 

Installations: 14 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

6 59 7 3 7 0 14 3 -24 5 30 -

13 5 72 -62 35 7 1

No Yes No No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Add signal and channelization 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 23 

Number of 

Installations: 23 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

16 14 22 11 18 13 -38 28 -16 41 40 22 -28 4 18 33 48 33

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Modify signal at channelized intersection 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 21 

Number of 

Installations: 21 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Modify 

signal at 21 -14

-

165 5 -27 -14 -25 -10 -14 -14 -46 -7 -62

-

116

-

33 24 -32

-

8
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 54 of 115

channelized 

intersection

Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Modify signal at non-channelized intersection 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 5 

Number of 

Installations: 5 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Modify 

signal at 

nonchannelized 

intersection

5 -40 63 -51 -35 -

25 -66 -15 -43 -71 -59 -

150

-

165

-

82

-

18 17 -65 -10

-

127

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Modify both signal and channelization 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 21 

Number of 

Installations: 21 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Modify both 

signal and 

channelization

21 10 59 22 -7 11 -37 -6 14 -13 22 54 -

44 -17 -4 -48 14 -162 16

Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Modify both signal and channelization 

Description: 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 55 of 115

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 21 

Number of 

Installations: 21 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Modify both 

signal and 

channelization

21 10 59 22 -7 11 -37 -6 14 -13 22 54 -

44 -17 -4 -48 14 -162 16

Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Modify signal and add channelization 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 10 

Number of 

Installations: 10 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Modify signal 

and add 

channelization

10 28 -87 27 29 28 30 -1 35 11 37 48 21 -

46

-

20

-

87 38 -17

Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Remove signal 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 56 of 115

Results: Remove 

signal 0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Add flashing warning signal (signalization) 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Add flashing 

warning 

signal 

(signalization)

4 -2 100 -

37 28 -2 59 -22 80 -30

-

117 100 -

63 100 100 46

No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Interconnect traffic signals 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Interconnect 

traffic signals 0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: New LT channelization w/ LT phase (signalized) 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 15 

Number of 

Installations: 15 

Miles Treated: 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 57 of 115

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

New LT 

channelization 

w/ LT phase 

(signalized)

15 15 58 27 1 13 48 14 19 13 10 23 -

111

-

22

-

24 2 30 22 12

Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: New LT channelization w/o LT phase (signalized) 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 11 

Number of 

Installations: 11 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

New LT 

channelization 

w/o LT phase 

(signalized)

11 28 75 35 18 33 -27 33 26 19 48 62 45 31 -9 34 37 -

36 29

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: New LT channelization (nonsignalized intersection) 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 66 

Number of 

Installations: 66 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: New LT 

channelization 66 3 32 7 -2 -4 19 -17 8 -5 2 8 38 -4 -11 5 6 -16 11
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 58 of 115

(nonsignalized 

intersection)

No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Modify intersection at signalized intersection 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 45 

Number of 

Installations: 45 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Modify 

intersection 

at 

signalized 

intersection

45 5 1 12 -1 3 77 0 7 -5 7 18 -59 -

23 13 11 20 2 14

Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Modify intersection at non-signalized intersection 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 12 

Number of 

Installations: 12 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Modify 

intersection 

at nonsignalized 

intersection

12 8 34 15 1 7 30 3 5 -6 11 29 -

41 9 21 -53

-

229 12 16

Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No Yes No No

File Name: Hyperlink
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 59 of 115

CounterMeasures: Modify channelization and add signal 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Modify 

channelization 

and add signal

2 22 21 22 22 -

131 18 11 16 39 33 -6 53 -68 16 -26 5

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Increase storage lane 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 14 

Number of 

Installations: 14 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Increase 

storage 

lane

14 8 -41 10 8 13 -10 -6 13 -4 3 1 -

57 -11 -7 -55 27 -15 7

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Add turn bay 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 15 

Number of 

Installations: 15 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 60 of 115

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Add 

turn 

bay

15 41 49 44 39 43 5 39 44 28 48 27 -

25 18 -15 76 -170 49 41

Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Add right turn 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 12 

Number of 

Installations: 12 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Add 

right 

turn

12 -5 -1 -3 -7 -

14 25 0 -13 -5 -35 -75 -163

-

33

-

18

-

42 24 -

1 3

No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Add LT (T-intersection) 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 6 

Number of 

Installations: 6 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Add LT (Tintersection) 6 43 3 62 24 36 48 -60 64 50 60 70 -

191 27 -83 100 100 57 -19

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No

File Name: Hyperlink
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 61 of 115

CounterMeasures: Add LT (Y-intersection) 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Add LT (Yintersection) 1 42 -

118 53 31 42 24 56 52 48 84 46 17 32 69 -118 27 64

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Add 2nd LT lane in same direction as existing 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 17 

Number of 

Installations: 17 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Add 2nd 

LT lane 

in same 

direction 

as 

existing

17 -5 -16 13 -19 -8 92 -4 -9 -9 2 19 12 -58 15 -

95 -83 0 11

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Guardrail at bridges end 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 2 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 62 of 115

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Guardrail 

at 

bridges 

end

2 -5 -

16

-

16 2 -5 1 1 -21 42 -16

-

8 23 -

160 15

No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Guardrail at steep embankments 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Guardrail at 

steep 

embankments

3 -7 -3 3 -

19 -3 -19

-

68 2 3 -210 -55 40 -125 100 5 -9

No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Guardrail at steep embankments with curve 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 63 of 115

Results: 

Guardrail at 

steep 

embankments 

with curve

1 -

256

-

78

-

256

-

167 100 11

Yes No Yes Yes No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Guardrail at roadside obstacles (piers, sign posts, poles, etc.) 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Guardrail 

at 

roadside 

obstacles 

(piers, 

sign 

posts, 

poles, 

etc.)

1 52 60 37 52 27 62 44 100 68 37 100 100 54

Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Guardrail end treatments 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Guardrail 

end 

treatments

0

File Name: Hyperlink
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 64 of 115

CounterMeasures: Guardrail relocation 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Guardrail 

relocation 0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Guardrail removal 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Guardrail 

removal 0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Add painted median 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Add 

painted 

median

2 43 78 43 40 43 -

273 25 33 14 68 66 62 -44 57 83 -15 39

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 65 of 115

CounterMeasures: Add raised median 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 25 

Number of 

Installations: 25 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Add 

raised 

median

25 16 25 18 15 16 79 19 15 0 23 32 -

19 17 -11 39 11 -75 24

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Increase median width 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Increase 

median 

width

4 -2 -

12 0 -3 -10 100 -19 3 3 -43 5 3 -28 30 -699

-

224 60 45

No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Add two-way LT lanes 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 14 

Number of 

Installations: 14 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 66 of 115

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Add 

twoway 

LT 

lanes

14 40 34 43 37 38 43 32 42 54 30 35 32 35 39 25 -57 27 28

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Install concrete median barrier 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Install 

concrete 

median 

barrier

1 -37 56 -27 -46 -37 -71 -36 -46 -

407 56 94 29 -

112 9 -

58

-

73

-

48

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Install double sided guardrail on wider median 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 15 

Number of 

Installations: 15 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 67 of 115

Results: 

Install 

double 

sided 

guardrail 

on wider 

median

15 -

15 8 -2 -30 -25 8 -9 -17 -26 24 0 -8 -54 38 -80 22 -54

Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Install attenuator type (IBC) barrier 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Install 

attenuator 

type (IBC) 

barrier

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Upgrade to concrete median barrier 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Upgrade to 

concrete 

median 

barrier

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Upgrade to attenuator barrier 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 68 of 115

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Upgrade to 

attenuator 

barrier

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Pavement deslicking 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Pavement 

deslicking 4 -3 -30

-

13 2 -2 -20 -34 3 17 -24 -7 8 -43 8 -399 35 -127 30

No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Skid Hazard overlay 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 115 

Number of 

Installations: 115 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Skid 

Hazard 

overlay

115 -8 -41 -7 -8 -7 -18 -

12 -6 -1 -35 -6 -6 -13 -13 -14 -16 1 15

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Pavement grooving 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 69 of 115

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Pavement 

grooving 0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Eliminate parking 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Eliminate 

parking 4 12 100 11 12 12 8 13 2 29 32 46 25 9 13 63 26

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Change two-way operation to oneway 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Change twoway 

operation to 

one-way

0
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 70 of 115

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Prohibit turns 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Prohibit 

turns

2 -

190 100 -99 -309

-

190 -43 -360

-

218

-

138

-

19

-

19

-

19

-

99

Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Modify speed limit (increase or decrease) 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Modify 

speed 

limit 

(increase 

or 

decrease)

1 52 56 50 53 52 54 -

18 75 85 71 56 100 78

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Delineation of right edge lines 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 71 of 115

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Delineation 

of right edge 

lines

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Delineation of painted median edge lines 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Delineation 

of painted 

median 

edge lines

1 -76 -18 -

155 -76 -65

-

85 -85 7 -85 31 -410

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Centerline striping 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Centerline 

striping 0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Delineation of no passing stripes 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 72 of 115

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Delineation 

of no passing 

stripes

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Delineation of reflectorized guide 

markers 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Delineation 

of 

reflectorized 

guide 

markers

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Delineation of reflectorized raised pavement markers (center line) 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Delineation 

of 

reflectorized 

raised 

1 10 23 11 5 21 16 3 7 7 -

62 100 81 -32 38 100 25 7
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 73 of 115

pavement 

markers 

(center line)

No No No No Yes No No No No No No Yes No No Yes No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: 

Delineation of general pavement 

markings (stop bar, ped. crossing, 

code 46-51) 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Delineation 

of general 

pavement 

markings 

(stop bar, 

ped. 

crossing, 

code 46-51)

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Delineation of guide posts on curves 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Delineation 

of guide 

posts on 

curves

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Intersection delineation 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 74 of 115

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Intersection 

delineation 0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Curve warning Signing 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Curve 

warning 

Signing

2 35 6 49 44 -

306 56 21 72 -2 32 49 49 -2 19

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Chevrons Signing 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Chevrons 

Signing 1 30 12 63 30 -120 78 -120 100 100 -65 100 100 45 -120

No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 75 of 115

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: All-way stops Signing 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: All-way stops 

Signing 0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Overhead directional (where to turn) Signing 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Overhead 

directional 

(where to 

turn) 

Signing

3 -7 100 -9 -5 -7 -

17 -4 -15 16 9 41 14 -21

-

383

-

45

-

11

No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Roadside directional (where to turn) 

Signing 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 76 of 115

Results: 

Roadside 

directional 

(where to 

turn) Signing

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Overhead lane designation Signing 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Overhead 

lane 

designation 

Signing

1 35 7 44 35 7 69 100 53 30 -

87 7

No No No No No Yes Yes No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Minor leg stop control Signing 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Minor leg 

stop control 

Signing

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Yield sign 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 77 of 115

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Yield sign 0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Advanced warning signs 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 1 

Number of Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Advanced 

warning 

signs

1 60 60 60 60 100

No No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Intersection directional or warning 

signs 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Intersection 

directional or 

warning 

signs

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: New roadway segment lighting 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 78 of 115

Number of 

Installations: 67 

Number of 

Installations: 67 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

New 

roadway 

segment 

lighting

67 1 24 8 -9 0 24 14 -6 -4 -5 20 -10 -4 -10 -2 32 18 4

No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Upgrade roadway segment lighting 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 10 

Number of 

Installations: 10 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Upgrade 

roadway 

segment 

lighting

10 -14 13 -12 -17 -

14 100 -3 -20 -25 -31 15 39 -4 -2 -48 0 10 -

1

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: New lighting at intersection 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 10 

Number of 

Installations: 10 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 79 of 115

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

New 

lighting at 

intersection

10 1 37 -4 7 2 -1 23 -9 -

25

-

17 11 31 10 30 -13 -13 39 -20

No No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Upgrade lighting at intersection 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Upgrade 

lighting at 

intersection

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Bridge approach lighting 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Bridge 

approach 

lighting

1 9 -5 21 9 32 -

42 62 37 -26 24

No No No No No No No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Underpass lighting 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 80 of 115

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Underpass 

lighting 0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Intersection flashers four leg red-yellow 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Intersection 

flashers 

four leg 

red-yellow

2 -

59 100 -

59 36 -

91 52

No Yes No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Intersection flashers three leg redyellow 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Intersection 

flashers 

three leg 

red-yellow

0

File Name: Hyperlink
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 81 of 115

CounterMeasures: Intersection flashers four way red 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Intersection 

flashers four 

way red

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Unknown 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Unknown 2 -

157 36 -71 100 -29

-

179 36 -61

Yes No No Yes No Yes No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Advanced warning flashers (curve and intersection) 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 82 of 115

Results: 

Advanced 

warning 

flashers 

(curve & 

intersection)

3 -

239 100 -6 -691

-

264 100 -286

-

220

-

166

-

118

-

1059

-

582 100 -309

Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Install flashing warning signal (flashing beacon) 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 6 

Number of 

Installations: 6 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Install 

flashing 

warning 

signal 

(flashing 

beacon)

6 -22 -

256 -41 -11 -52 22 -86 -4 -70

-

45 15 41 17 -34 70 29 -

31

Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures

: Obstacle Removal/Hazard Mitigation 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 5 

Number of 

Installations: 5 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 83 of 115

Results: 

Obstacle 

Removal/Hazar

d Mitigation

5 25 28 37 5 26 19 33 19 22 37 44 14 4 26 6 -38 6

1

2

8

Yes N

o

Ye

s

N

o

Ye

s

Ye

s

Ye

s

Ye

s

Ye

s

Ye

s

Ye

s

N

o

N

o

Ye

s

N

o

Ye

s

Ye

s

Ye

s

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Relocate obstacle 30 feet from road 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Relocate 

obstacle 30 

feet from 

road

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Convert to breakaway 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Convert to 

breakaway 0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Cushion attenuators 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 84 of 115

Results: Cushion 

attenuators

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Install guardrail 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 11 

Number of 

Installations: 11 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Install 

guardrail 11 -36 40 -15 -61 -47 4 -38 -34 -27 -18

-

104 100 -38 -97

-

53 44 5 -51

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Upgrade substandard bridgerail 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Upgrade 

substandard 

bridgerail

1 25 100 -

125 25 100 -12

-

12

No Yes Yes No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Realignment 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 4 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 85 of 115

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Realignment 4 50 46 41 61 41 100 27 54 42 70 -

50 8 -43

-

437 100 100 8

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Superelevation 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 1 

Number of Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Superelevation 1

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Modify/Close median openings 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 44 

Number of 

Installations: 44 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Modify/Close 

median 

openings

44 7 34 16 -2 7 53 1 10 -6 17 25 -71 -27 -11 -

56 -21 12 12

Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Relocate drives 

Description: 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 86 of 115

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Relocate 

drives 0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Curtail turning movements 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Curtail 

turning 

movements

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Increase radii at intersection 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Increase 

radii at 

intersection

2 38 100 16 58 57 21 44 -5 48 -

5 100 -109

Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Widen travel way 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 87 of 115

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Widen 

travel 

way

2 -52 27 -

31 -66 -2 -149 -40 7 -56

-

136

-

164

-

27 -10 45 -10

-

147

-

65

Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Widen shoulder 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Widen 

shoulder 2 -9 26 -11 -11 16 -845

-

18 5 -178

-

48

-

233 72 -39

-

48

-

78 1

No No No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Add 4 foot shoulders (bike lane) 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 88 of 115

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Add 4 

foot 

shoulders 

(bike 

lane)

1 6 15 3 6 -95 17 -15 -37 57 59 51 -

173 67 -18

No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Construct grade separation 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Construct 

grade 

separation

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Widen bridge (min. of 6 feet) 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 6 

Number of 

Installations: 6 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Widen 

bridge 

(min. 

of 6 

feet)

6 -

20

-

112 -17 -20 -52 47 -21 -27

-

61 -6 -6 100 -29 -6 -6 -6 47 -43

Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Reconstruct road and shoulders 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 89 of 115

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 10 

Number of 

Installations: 10 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Reconstruct 

road & 

shoulders

10 -11 -99 -13 -8 -23 66 -

41 -2 -1 -51 -9 9 -10 -35 -43 -29 -73 12

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Reconstruct curve 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Reconstruct 

curve

3 42 100 53 43 40 54 28 53 23 27 58 100 78 48 100 17 64 27

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Construct interchange 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 90 of 115

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Construct 

interchange 2 31 72 24 35 22 100 24 44 39 22 44 25 16 53 41

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Lengthen accel/decel lanes 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 1 

Number of Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Lengthen 

accel/decel 

lanes

1

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Extend drop lane 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Extend drop 

lane 0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Install rumble strips 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 11 

Number of 

Installations: 11 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 91 of 115

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Install 

rumble 

strips

11 15 46 14 10 39 12 31 -2 -4 7 -

25

-

124 33 14 19 -86 38 5

Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Flatten side slopes 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Flatten side 

slopes 0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Install Accel/Decel lane 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Install 

Accel/Decel 

lane

3 6 100 -9 -2 6 31 -4 32 22 -

118 46 100 100 64 -118

No Yes No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Upgrade signal and add pedestrian feature 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 92 of 115

Number of 

Installations: 18 

Number of 

Installations: 18 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Upgrade 

signal and 

add 

pedestrian 

feature

18 -6 10 15 -21 -6 -7 -8 -22 -21 11 -22 -

19 18 -75

-

2

-

16

-

3

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Sight distance improvements 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Sight distance 

improvements 3 25 -93 38 10 24 25 61 4 13 49 81 52 4 4

No No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Minor structures replaced or improved for safety 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 93 of 115

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Minor 

structures 

replaced 

or 

improved 

for safety

4 -7 -

23 -4 -10 -7 7 -14 -23 -47

-

47 -49 1 -2 51 -9 30 -59

No No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Lanes added to travel way 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 5 

Number of 

Installations: 5 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Lanes 

added 

to 

travel 

way

5 -6 53 2 -

18 -6 6 -10 -39 32 66 -17 -57 14 -

289

-

250 17 -

28

No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Upgraded guardrail 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: Upgraded 

guardrail 3 -43 -75 -28 -75 -31 -61 -25 -57 -64 -29 -194

-

134 15 -28 -647 81 -13

-

17
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 94 of 115

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Sidewalk construction 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 19 

Number of 

Installations: 19 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Sidewalk 

construction 19 -14 -22 -1 -32 -14 -1 -22 -20 -20 -21

-

93

-

51 -5 15 4 -27

-

3

Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Over/Under passes for pedestrians and/or bicycles 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Over/Under 

passes for 

pedestrians 

and/or 

bicycles

3 -59 -39 -94 -

59

-

146

-

29 -26 -65 -605

-

34

-

404

-

202

-

15

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Fencing or other pedestrian barriers 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 95 of 115

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Fencing or 

other 

pedestrian 

barriers

2 -4 100 11 -43 -4 -

61 4 3 10 27 100 -107

-

12 3 -45 1

No Yes No Yes No Yes No No No No No Yes No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Ramps on existing curbs 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Ramps on 

existing 

curbs

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures

: New bikeway/multi-use path construction 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 96 of 115

Results: 

New 

bikeway/multi

-use path 

construction

4 -28 -42 -23 -34 -28 -34 -31 -23 -35 -44

-

24

0

-

21

1

-82 -

13

-

45 -16

-

1

7

-

6

4

Yes N

o

Ye

s

Ye

s

Ye

s

Ye

s

Ye

s

Ye

s

Ye

s

Ye

s

Ye

s

Ye

s

Yes No Ye

s

N

o

N

o

Ye

s

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Bicycle non-construction improvements 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Bicycle nonconstruction 

improvements

4 21 -11 17 25 21 24 21 19 -5 -

80

-

128 -3 10 -9 -36

-

14 30

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Impact Attenuators 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Impact 

Attenuators 3 2 16 -27 2 -14 4 -3 -14 45 -36 26 -36

-

2

-

2 74 2

No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Signing and Pavement Markings 

Description: 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 97 of 115

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 85 

Number of 

Installations: 85 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Signing 

and 

Pavement 

Markings

85 2 11 0 3 2 13 2 3 -3 -23 -53 -95 -

27 -4 -4 -4 -

8

-

9

Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Install Traffic Calming Features 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Install 

Traffic 

Calming 

Features

2 8 100 3 -

16 8 13 20 42 36 42 23 100 71 42

No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Add paved shoulders 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 24 

Number of 

Installations: 24 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 98 of 115

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Add 

paved 

shoulders

24 4 0 11 -

11 7 2 9 2 -4 -5 16 39 13 -2 -7 23 7 15

No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Add turn lane/s and pavement resurfacing 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 9 

Number of 

Installations: 9 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Add turn 

lane/s & 

pavement 

resurfacing

9 35 41 43 25 35 42 31 43 15 38 15 -8 14 70 27 2 44

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No No Yes No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Reconstruct bicycle/multi-use path 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Reconstruct 

bicycle/multiuse path1 37 100 40 33 37 64 24 17 38 52 4 61 36 52 71
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 99 of 115

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Construct median, add signal, and pavmnt.resurfacing 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Construct median, 

add signal, and 

pavmnt.resurfacing

4 9 -

104 34 -30 9 -6 13 31 4 22 -53

-

55 -9 32 100 33

Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Reconstruct median/median improvments 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 19 

Number of 

Installations: 19 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Reconstruct 

median/median 

improvments

19 -6 57 1 -16 -13 38 10 -12 -16 -

26 11 1 -39 -8 2 -25 24 -16

Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Construct LT and RT lanes 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 5 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 100 of 115

Number of 

Installations: 5 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Construct 

LT and RT 

lanes

5 -8 -7 -4 -12 -

12 39 5 -8 -1 -76 11 -22

-

107 15 -114 20 47 19

No No No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Paved shoulders and rumble strips 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 6 

Number of 

Installations: 6 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Paved 

shoulders 

and 

rumble 

strips

6 7 33 -1 13 4 12 -9 18 11 -

19 3 -11 32 -38 6 0 -3 15

No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Upgrade traffic signal 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 101 of 115

Results: 

Upgrade 

traffic 

signal

4 16 22 13 17 9 5 17 25 8 -

44

-

57

-

37 26 -19 50 -19 28

Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No No No No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Traffic signals, guardrail, signing and 

lighting 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Traffic 

signals, 

guardrail, 

signing and 

lighting

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Traffic signals, resurfacing, turn lanes, lighting 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 5 

Number of 

Installations: 5 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Traffic 

signals, 

resurfacing, 

turn lanes, 

lighting

5 -

30 100 -6 -74 -17 -152 -78 -27 -28 -11 -30 -68 -107

-

107 -3 -3 31 -13

Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Resurface, guardrail, signing and pavt. markings 

Description: 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 102 of 115

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Resurface, 

guardrail, 

signing 

and pavt. 

markings

2 -25 12 -

63 -25 -110 -3 -159 1 18 -110

-

57 100 -110

-

372

Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Add Ped crossing mid-block with signals 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Number of 

Installations: 3 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Add 

Ped 

crossing 

midblock 

with 

signals

3 -

24 -93 -21 -27

-

24

-

25 -18 -60

-

19

-

479

-

9 4 4 -148

Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Add Ped crossing mid-block without signals 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 103 of 115

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Add 

Ped 

crossing 

midblock 

without 

signals

4 -53 -2 -35 -75 -53 -38 -65 -67 -59 -

35 -61 -151

-

10

-

171 18 42 -99

Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Add roundabout to intersection 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Number of 

Installations: 2 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Add 

roundabout 

to 

intersection

2 46 100 58 32 46 41 47 65 17 76 -90 44 5 -

1607

-

8 100 66

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Convert shldr inverted rumble to 

audible edgeline 

Description: 

Target Crash Type: 

Number of Installations: 0 

Number of Installations: 0 

Miles Treated: 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 104 of 115

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Convert shldr 

inverted 

rumble to 

audible 

edgeline

0

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: New inverted AUDIBLE marking on CL or edgeline 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 58 

Number of 

Installations: 58 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

New 

inverted 

AUDIBLE 

marking 

on CL or 

edgeline

58 4 21 9 -3 -1 10 3 7 -9 -10 -

75

-

186 4 19 -23 -4 30 1

Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Use of ITS safety system device(s) 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Number of 

Installations: 1 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 105 of 115

Results: 

Use of 

ITS 

safety 

system 

device(s)

1 -18 52 -

45 -18 -3 -11 -267 23 -38 -210

-

210

-

3 83 100 -107

No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: High friction surface treatment (tyregrip, etc.) 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 5 

Number of 

Installations: 5 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

High 

friction 

surface 

treatment 

(tyregrip, 

etc.)

5 15 -

119 -3 30 -20 20 -14 26 21 -137

-

31 54 18 63

No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink

CounterMeasures: Modify signal timing and phasing 

Description: 

Target Crash 

Type: 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Number of 

Installations: 4 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 3 

Years After: 3 

Methodology: Before/after using comparison group 

Results: 

Modify 

signal 

timing 

4 -

18 48 -11 -26 -18 -18 -16 -35 -42 -27 -213

-

37 -56 -91

-

42

-

36
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 106 of 115

and 

phasing

Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes

File Name: Hyperlink
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 107 of 115

Project Effectiveness

Provide the following information for previously implemented projects that the State evaluated this reporting period. 

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

IMPROVEMENT 

TYPE

PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL INJURY

BEFORE

ALL INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

See attachment See attachment

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Reference the attached table for previously implemented projects.

Are there any other aspects of the overall HSIP effectiveness on which the State would like to elaborate?

No
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 108 of 115

Compliance Assessment

What date was the State’s current SHSP approved by the Governor or designated State representative?

 07/28/2016

What are the years being covered by the current SHSP?

From: 2016 To: 2021

When does the State anticipate completing it’s next SHSP update?

 2021

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is the statewide plan focusing on how to accomplish the vision of eliminating fatalities and reducing serious injuries on all public roads. The SHSP is updated at least every five years by FDOT in 

coordination with statewide, regional, and local traffic safety partners and was last updated in 2016. The SHSP is focused on the roadway component of transportation safety. Safety on other modes of transportation is covered by other 

plans. The SHSP and safety plans for other modes align not only with the Florida Transportation Plan (FTP), but also with national programs funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Motor Carrier Safety 

Administration (FMCSA), and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

Our data-driven SHSP focuses on 13 Emphasis Areas, which reflect ongoing and emerging highway safety issues in Florida. Key strategies related to each Emphasis Area are identified, as well as overarching strategies that apply across 

Emphasis Areas. These strategies align with the “4 Es” - engineering, education, enforcement, and emergency response. The SHSP also defines a framework for implementation activities to be carried out through strategic safety coalitions 

and specific activities by FDOT, other State agencies, metropolitan planning organizations, local governments, and other traffic safety partners. 

The SHSP update process included:

• Analysis of safety data collected by FDOT, the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (DHSMV), and other sources to identify trends in the number of traffic fatalities and serious injuries and factors often 

associated with these events. All data presented in the SHSP are from DHSMV for 2011 to 2015 unless otherwise noted. This plan was developed using the most recent data available at the time of plan approval.

• Consideration of extensive partner and public input gathered through the FTP update process in 2015. This process engaged more than 15,000 participants through a 35-member Steering Committee, four advisory groups, three 

statewide events, 13 regional forums and workshops, and more than 350 partner briefings. This input reaffirmed the State’s commitment to maintaining a safe and secure transportation system for residents, visitors, and businesses. 

The process also highlighted several safety issues of concern to the public, including bicycle and pedestrian safety, commercial vehicles, the impacts of changing technologies, and the role of design and operational decisions in 

creating a safe environment.

• Coordination with at least eight strategic safety coalitions representing statewide, regional, and local partners from both the public and private sectors. These coalitions provided targeted input on the emphasis areas specifically 

related to their current strategic plans, and defined key strategies for the next five years.

• Coordination with Florida’s 27 metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs), including review of safety-related goals, objectives, and strategies in MPO plans and targeted outreach sessions through Florida’s Metropolitan Planning

Organization Advisory Council.

• Review and approval by the signing partners.

[Source: FDOT Highway Safety Plan]

Provide the current status (percent complete) of MIRE fundamental data elements collection efforts using the table below. 
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 109 of 115

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

MIRE NAME (MIRE NO.) STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

ROADWAY SEGMENT

Segment Identifier (12) 0 0 0 0 0 0

Route Number (8) 0 0

Route/Street Name (9) 0 0

Federal Aid/Route Type 

(21)

0 0

Rural/Urban Designation 

(20)

0 0 0 0

Surface Type (23) 0 0 0 0

Begin Point Segment 

Descriptor (10)

0 0 0 0 0 0

End Point Segment 

Descriptor (11)

0 0 0 0 0 0

Segment Length (13) 0 0

Direction of Inventory (18) 0 0

Functional Class (19) 0 0 0 0 0 0

Median Type (54) 0 0

Access Control (22) 0 0

One/Two Way Operations 

(91)

0 0

Number of Through Lanes 

(31)

0 0 0 0

Average Annual Daily 

Traffic (79)

0 0 0 0

AADT Year (80) 0 0

Type of Governmental 

Ownership (4)

0 0 0 0 0 0

INTERSECTION

Unique Junction Identifier 

(120)

0 0

Location Identifier for 

Road 1 Crossing Point 

(122)

0 0

Location Identifier for 

Road 2 Crossing Point 

(123)

0 0
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 110 of 115

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

MIRE NAME (MIRE NO.) STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Intersection/Junction 

Geometry (126)

0 0

Intersection/Junction 

Traffic Control (131)

0 0

AADT for Each 

Intersecting Road (79)

0 0

AADT Year (80) 0 0

Unique Approach 

Identifier (139)

0 0

INTERCHANGE/RAMP

Unique Interchange 

Identifier (178)

0 0

Location Identifier for 

Roadway at Beginning of 

Ramp Terminal (197)

0 0

Location Identifier for 

Roadway at Ending Ramp 

Terminal (201)

0 0

Ramp Length (187) 0 0

Roadway Type at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (195)

0 0

Roadway Type at End 

Ramp Terminal (199)

0 0

Interchange Type (182) 0 0

Ramp AADT (191) 0 0

Year of Ramp AADT (192) 0 0

Functional Class (19) 0 0

Type of Governmental 

Ownership (4)

0 0

Totals (Average Percent 

Complete):

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

There are 91,943.360 miles of local roads in the State of Florida for 2016 reporting. Of those 2.604 miles of local roads are State owned. Of those 75,954.079 are paved and 15,989.281 are unpaved.

There are 5,143.956 miles of local roads in the Roadway Characteristic Inventory (RCI) database.
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 111 of 115

For roads in the RCI database segment identifier, rural/urban, and functional classification are coded. 

Begin and End Sector descriptions it is not a Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) requirement, but may be coded in the RCI database. 

Surface type is not reported for HPMS on local roads, but may be coded in the RCI database. 

For roads not in the RCI database, FDOT submitted line work to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for 2016 regarding the All Road Network of Linear Referenced Data (ARNOLD) HPMS reporting requirement. The ARNOLD 

linear reference system (LRS) also includes private local roads because ownership is difficult to determine.

FDOT assigned Segment Identifiers to ARNOLD. Segment identifiers are currently 11 digits for local roads in ARNOLD but they may be as long as 15 characters for non-mainline, dual alignments and connectors. 

2014 smoothed urban boundaries are not applied to ARNOLD as yet. Therefor rural or urban designation is not currently included. 

Surface type and miles of public roads are reported to FDOT however this information is a summary of roads owned local entities. Therefore surface type and miles of public roads are not assigned to specific lines in ARNOLD. 

Begin and End Sector descriptions for ARNOLD are not an requirement of HPMS and FDOT has not assigned this information to ARNOLD.

FDOT will be able to assign Functional Class to the roads, however it is not included for HPMS in 2016. 

Describe actions the State will take moving forward to meet the requirement to have complete access to the MIRE fundamental data elements on all public roads by September 30, 2026.

The Florida Traffic Safety Information System (TSIS) Strategic Plan serves as a guiding document for Florida’s Traffic Records Coordinating Committee (TRCC). The plan covers a five year period from 2017 through 2021. The purpose of the TSIS Strategic Plan is 

to provide a blueprint for measuring progress towards advancing the accessibility, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and uniformity of Florida’s traffic records systems and strengthening the TRCC program. It also provides Florida state agencies 

with a common basis for moving ahead with traffic records systems upgrades, integration, and data analysis required to conduct highway safety analyses in the State. The plan sets forth the specific actions and projects that will be undertaken over the 

next five years to accomplish these goals.

The following goals were identified for Florida's traffic safety information system based on assessment recommendations and stakeholder input during the strategic planning process:

• Goal 1 - Coordination. Provided ongoing coordination in support of multi-agency initiatives and projects which improve traffic records information systems.

• Goal 2 - Data Quality. Develop and maintain complete, accurate, uniform, and timely traffic records data.

• Goal 3 - Integration. Provide the ability to link traffic records data.

• Goal 4 - Accessibility. Facilitate access to traffic records data.

• Goal 5 - Utilization. Promote the use of traffic records data.

Regarding data quality (goal 2), objective 2.1 is to improve completeness of traffic records systems by December 2021. This objective includes improving the completeness of the Roadway Data System with includes MIRE fundamental data elements. The table 

below highlights details regarding strategies, actions, and other details.
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 112 of 115

Objectives Strategies/Action Steps Performance Measure and Method Timeline Leader FY2017 Update 

2.1 Improve completeness of traffic 

records systems by December 2021. 

Improve completeness of the Roadway Data System by reaching out to local governments and community safety 

organization for cooperation on roadway data-gathering for roads under local jurisdiction not covered by the Department’s 

Roadway Characteristics Inventory.

- Establish a plan to create a system to collect additional local roadway characteristics. 

» Collect volume usage data for non-motorized users

» Collect local roadway volume data beyond federally eligible and High Performance Monitoring System (HPMS)

» Increase the collection of additional roadway characteristics (i.e. number of lanes, etc.)

- Publicize the Department’s local roads map and encourage use of the map by local governments in their own applications 

and data interfaces

» Develop software tools for internal use to create links between local roadway/map data and the FDOT’s NavTeq dataset

- Work with local governments to establish relationships for sharing of roadway data

» Gather an inventory of existing data from local governments, MPOs or transportation planning

» Meet with at least 5 new local governments, MPOs or other transportation planning agencies each quarter for the purpose of 

identifying and including authoritative sources of local roadway information in local roads map

- Create data dictionary for the Roadway Data System 

 

Percent of total local roadway 

segments that include location 

coordinates

Number of characteristics collected

Established inventory

Number of local relationships 

established

 

December 2021

Quarterly

December 2021

FDOT

Existing systems that could incorporate data:

ARNOLD Data Set consists of a layer of all public roads (excluding 

those in FDOT network) Submitted to FHWA to meet federal 

requirements. 

Additional work still needed to fully merge local roads data with 

current FDOT linear referencing system.

Safety Office continues to update the All Roads Basemap based on 

NavTeq dataset

FDOT has met with MPOAC to coordinate SHSP safety goals. 

[Source: FDOT TRCC Florida Traffic Safety Information System Strategic Plan 2017-2021] 

Provide the suspected serious injury identifier, definition and attributes used by the State for both the crash report form and the crash database using the table below. Please also indicate whether or not these elements are 

compliant with the MMUCC 4th edition criteria for data element P5. Injury Status, suspected serious injury. 

CRITERIA SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY 

IDENTIFIER(NAME) MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY DEFINITION MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY ATTRIBUTES(DESCRIPTORS) MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * 

Crash Report Form Incapacitating Injury Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes

Crash Report Form Instruction Manual Incapacitating Injury Yes Injury Severity (INJ) = 4. Incapacitating Yes Injury Severity (INJ) = 4. Incapacitating Yes
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 113 of 115

CRITERIA SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY 

IDENTIFIER(NAME) MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY DEFINITION MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY ATTRIBUTES(DESCRIPTORS) MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * 

Incapacitating injuries are disabling injuries, 

such as broken bones, severed limbs, etc. 

These injuries usually

require hospitalization and transport to 

medical facility.

Incapacitating injuries are disabling injuries, 

such as broken bones, severed limbs, etc. 

These injuries usually

require hospitalization and transport to 

medical facility.

Crash Database Incapacitating Injury Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes

Crash Database Data Dictionary Incapacitating Injury Yes Injury Severity (INJ) = 4. Incapacitating

Incapacitating injuries are disabling injuries, 

such as broken bones, severed limbs, etc. 

These injuries usually

require hospitalization and transport to 

medical facility.

Yes Injury Severity (INJ) = 4. Incapacitating

Incapacitating injuries are disabling injuries, 

such as broken bones, severed limbs, etc. 

These injuries usually

require hospitalization and transport to 

medical facility.

Yes

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Information regarding the definition of serious injury comes from Florida's crash manual titled INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE FLORIDA UNIFORM TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT FORMS HSMV 90010S. The Florida 

Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles maintains the manual which was revised March 2015. 

Did the State conduct an HSIP program assessment during the reporting period?

No

When does the State plan to complete it’s next HSIP program assessment. 

2019 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 114 of 115

Optional Attachments

Program Structure:

FL HSIP Guideline 1991.pdf

Project Implementation:

Safety Performance:

Evaluation: 

hsip - crf (2017-08-23).xlsx

hsip2016_fdot_q45.xlsx

Compliance Assessment:
2017 Florida Highway Safety Improvement Program 

Page 115 of 115

Glossary

5 year rolling 

average 

means the average of five individuals, consecutive annual points of data (e.g. annual 

fatality rate). 

Emphasis area means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process. 

Highway safety 

improvement 

project 

means strategies, activities and projects on a public road that are consistent with a State 

strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous road location or 

feature or addresses a highway safety problem. 

HMVMT means hundred million vehicle miles traveled. 

Non-infrastructure 

projects 

are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of non-infrastructure projects 

include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, improvements in the 

collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement activities. 

Older driver special 

rule 

applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and pedestrians over 

the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which data are 

available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance 

dated February 13, 2013. 

Performance 

measure 

means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to monitor changes 

in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and objectives. 

Programmed funds mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects. 

Roadway 

Functional 

Classification 

means the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, 

according to the character of service they are intended to provide. 

Strategic Highway 

Safety Plan (SHSP) 

means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on safety data developed by a 

State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148. 

Systematic refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across a 

system. 

Systemic safety 

improvement 

means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high risk roadway features 

that are correlated with specific severe crash types. 

Transfer 

means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned 

for the fiscal year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.