USA Banner
  U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Here's how you knowOfficial US Government Icon
              **Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
            Secure Site Icon
              **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
 U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation
 Search DOT
            Search
                    About FHWAFHWA Organization
                Headquarters Offices
                Field Offices
                Strategic Plan
                Business Opportunities
                Staff Directories
                Careers
                Highway History
                Contact UsProgramsAcquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                Safety
                Browse by TopicsResourcesCore Highway Topics
                Federal Aid Essentials
                Automation
                Complete Streets
                Laws and Regulations
                Policy & Guidance Center
                Section 508
                Publications and Statistics
                Professional Development
                National Highway Institute
                Resource Center
                Accessibility Resource Library
                FHWA Research LibraryNewsroomPress Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Photos
                Videos
                Media ContactsMenu FHWA Highway Safety Programs Home
                        Safety
                        Roadway Departure Safety
                        Reduce Crash Severity
                        Hardware Eligibility Letters


            
            In This Section
        Roadway Departure Safety
                Strategic Approach
                                Strategic Plan
                Crash Emphasis Brochures
                Focused Approach
                Noteworthy Practices
                Partner Resources
                Keep Vehicles on the Road
                                Pavement Friction
                Horizontal Curve Safety
                Rumble Strips and Rumble Stripes
                Nighttime Visibility
                Provide for a Safe Recovery
                                SafetyEdge
                Clear Zones
                Reduce Crash Severity
                                Overview
                Hardware Eligibility Letters
                Focus on Reducing Rural Roadway Departures (FoRRRwD)
                                Overview
                All Public Roads
                Proven Countermeasures
                Systemic Approach
                Safety Action Plans
                FoRRRwD Resources
                
                Safety Eligibility Letter B-150A
  
  **Hardware Type:**
            Longitudinal Barriers and Bridge Rails
                          **Code:**
            B-150A
                          **Date:**
            03/26/2008
                          **Testing Criteria:**
            MASH
                          **Manufacturer:**
            Gregory Highway Products
                          **Device Description:**
            GMS roadside and median Guardrail to MASH08
                          **View PDF:**
            b150a.pdf (1.35 MB)
    
    "FHWA Logo"

1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E.
Washington, D.C. 20590

March 26, 2008

In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-150A

Mr. Andrew Artar
Vice President Sales and Marketing
Gregory Highway Products
4100 13th Street, SW
Canton, OH 44710

Dear Mr. Artar:

This is in response to your letter of November 1, 2007, requesting the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) acceptance of your company’s single- and dual-face w-beam Gregory Mini Spacer (GMS) Guardrail Systems as a test level 3 (TL-3) device for use on the National Highway System (NHS). Accompanying your letter were reports of crash testing conducted by Southwest Research Institute. You requested that we find this device acceptable for use on the NHS under the provisions of the forthcoming American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Manual on Assessing Safety Hardware-2008 (MASH08), which is expected to supersede Report 350 in the near future.

**Introduction**
The FHWA guidance on crash testing of roadside safety hardware is contained in a memorandum dated July 25, 1997, titled “INFORMATION: Identifying Acceptable Highway Safety Features” and recognizes National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 “Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features” as the current crash test guidance. The Gregory Highway Products has chosen to anticipate the adoption of MASH08 by testing with the 2270P vehicle, an option that FHWA has offered with the understanding that testing may need to be done over if changes to the test criteria are made before MASH08 is formally adopted.

The GMS system was found acceptable under NCHRP Report 350 criteria in our FHWA acceptance letter B-150 dated October 27, 2006. Your present request is for MASH08 acceptance of the same barrier system, described as follows:

The GMS system consists of 12-gauge steel W-beam panels mounted directly onto standard, unmodified 6-foot long W6 x 8.5 steel posts with no offset blocks or backup plates, spaced at 6 feet 3 inches and with a top-of-rail height of either 31 inches or 27 5/8 inches. The rail was attached to each post using a 5/16-inch diameter standard hex head bolt incorporated into a proprietary releasable fastener called a “GMS” that enables conventional guardrail and posts to perform without the need for offset blocks.

The two test summary sheets using the 2270P vehicle, one each for the 27 5/8 inch height (Test GMS-4) at TL-2 and one for the same mounting height (Test GMS-6) at TL-3, are enclosed for reference. Testing with the 820C vehicle on the 31 inch dual-face w-beam barrier having two splices at every other post had been conducted under the initial testing (Test GMS-2) and is considered a “worst case scenario” as it used a lighter vehicle than called for in MASH08 potentially subjecting vehicle occupants to higher impact forces, especially since there were two rail connections at each post contacted by the vehicle.

**Testing**
Full-scale automobile and pickup testing has been conducted on the GMS barrier. Tests GMS-1 and GMS-2 supported FHWA acceptance letter B-150. Tests GMS-4 and GMS-6 were conducted to support the present request. The GMS-4 was intended to be a TL-3 test but a testing malfunction resulted in inadequate impact speed and re-run as GMS-6. Selected barrier and crash test details, including dynamic deflection, are summarized in the following table.

Test #
			Test Designation
			Barrier Height*
			Barrier
			Deflection**GMS-1
			MASH08 TL-3 / 3-11
			31 inches.
			Single faced.
			2.92 ftGMS-2
			Report 350 TL-3 / 3-10
			31 inches
			Dual faced
			2.20 ftGMS-4
			MASH08 TL-2 / 2-11
			27-5/8 inches
			Single faced
			2.25 ftGMS-6
			MASH08 TL-3 / 3-11
			27-5/8 inches
			Single faced
			4.33 ft* Height to top of rail.
** Maximum dynamic deflection. Our current criteria sets the “design deflection distance” at the maximum dynamic deflection recorded in *Report 350* test 3-11. From the crash testing you performed and your analysis (a method that agrees with a tuned Barrier VII analysis), you came up with recommended Report 350 test 3-11 (2000P) deflection criteria. You recommend that the minimum distances at which the face of a GMS installation be placed from the face of a rigid obstacle (e.g., bridge pier or overhead sign support) be 1.25 m (49 inches), 1.12 m (44 inches), and 0.90 m (35 inches) for standard (6 ft 3 inch), 1/2, and 1/4 post spacing, respectively. These offsets are based on the “working width” deflections seen in the crash tests/analysis and include some degree of pickup truck penetration beyond the vertical plane of the barrier’s dynamic deflection. As with all traffic barriers, larger offset distances would be required to shield similar features from vehicles with higher centers of gravity, such as single-unit trucks or buses, because of the relatively high roll angles seen with these vehicles in rigid and semi-rigid barrier tests of similar height.

**Findings**
As noted in the enclosed test data summary sheets the test vehicles were smoothly redirected and met occupant impact force and occupant compartment deformation criteria. Therefore, the system described above is acceptable for use on the NHS under the range of conditions tested, when such use is acceptable to the contracting authority. You also requested the following be included in this acceptance letter:

The GMS-WB system may be installed with top-of-rail height between 27 and 32 inches.
	The GMS-WB may be installed with splices at or between posts.
	The GMS-WB may be installed with Modified G4(1S) W6 x 8.5 steel posts or with G4(2W) nominal 6 x 8 inch rectangular or G4(RW) nominal 7 inch diameter round timber posts.
	The GMS spacer called a “Mini Spacer” may be used on any non-proprietary strong or weak post w-beam barrier length-of-need with or without the use of a spacer block, and such usage will not change the test level of the barrier on which it is used.We concur in these variations for both single face and dual face installations.

Please note the following standard provisions that apply to the FHWA letters of acceptance:

This acceptance is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the devices.
	Any changes that may adversely influence the crashworthiness of the device will require a new acceptance letter.
	Should the FHWA discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in-service performance reveals unacceptable safety problems, or that the device being marketed is significantly different from the version that was crash tested we reserve the right to modify or revoke its acceptance.
	You will be expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design and installation requirements to ensure proper performance.
	You will be expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has essentially the same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for acceptance, and that they will meet the crashworthiness requirements of the FHWA and MASH08.
	To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of acceptance is designated as number B-150A and shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test documentation upon which this letter is based are public information. All such letters and documentation may be reviewed at our office upon request.
	The Gregory Mini Spacer is a patented product and considered proprietary. If proprietary devices are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid projects, except exempt, non-NHS projects, they: (a) must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally suitable unpatented items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are essential for synchronization with the existing highway facilities or that no equally suitable alternative exists; or (c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes. Our regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 635.411.
	This acceptance letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to use, manufacture, or sell any patented device for which the applicant is not the patent holder. The acceptance letter is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the candidate device, and the FHWA is neither prepared nor required to become involved in issues concerning patent law. Patent issues, if any, are to be resolved by the applicant.Sincerely yours,

			"David A. Nicol signature"

			David A. Nicol, P.E.
			Director, Office of Safety Design
			Office of Safety U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Highway Administration**

1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE

WASHINGTON, DC 20590

202-366-4000Subscribe to email updates
                    About
  

        
              About FHWA
                Careers
                Org Chart
                Staff Directories
                Work with UsPrograms
  

        
              Acquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                SafetyPolicies, Rights, Legal
  

        
              About DOT
                Accessibility
                Budget and Performance
                Civil Rights
                FOIA
                Information Quality
                No FEAR Act
                Office of Inspector General
                Privacy Policy
                USA.gov
                Web Policies and Notices
                Web StandardsNews & Events
  

        
              Newsroom
                Press Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Media Contacts
                Connect with Us