Page 1 of 42

OKLAHOMA 

2020 ANNUAL REPORT 
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 2 of 42

Table of Contents

Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................................. 3

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence ............................................................. 3

Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4

Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5

Program Structure................................................................................................................................. 5

Program Administration ..................................................................................................................... 5

Program Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 6

Project Implementation .......................................................................................................................13

Funds Programmed .........................................................................................................................13

General Listing of Projects ..............................................................................................................15

Safety Performance ............................................................................................................................25

General Highway Safety Trends ......................................................................................................25

Safety Performance Targets............................................................................................................30

Applicability of Special Rules ...........................................................................................................32

Evaluation ...........................................................................................................................................33

Program Effectiveness ....................................................................................................................33

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements .......................................................33

Project Effectiveness .......................................................................................................................37

Compliance Assessment.....................................................................................................................38

Optional Attachments ..........................................................................................................................41

Glossary ..............................................................................................................................................42
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 3 of 42

Disclaimer

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or 

data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section[HSIP], shall not be subject to discovery or 

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action 

for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, 

schedules, lists, or other data.

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or 

data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section[HSIP], shall not be subject to discovery or 

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action 

for damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, 

schedules, lists, or other data.23 U.S.C. 409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, 

surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning 

the safety enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway 

crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway 

safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall 

not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for 

other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in 

such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.”
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 4 of 42

Executive Summary

ODOT obligated $17.2 million in HSIP funds for FY2019. 48 percent of HSIP funds were obligated for signing 

projects, followed by 20 percent on striping, 15 percent on cable barrier, and 12 percent on ADA The remaining 

funds were obligated for intersection improvements, traffic signals, rumble strips, school zones, guardrail 

replacement, ITS operations and infrastructure, and bridge projects.
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 5 of 42

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of achieving 

a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 148(h) and 23 CFR 

924.15, States are required to report annually on the progress being made to advance HSIP implementation 

and evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the HSIP Reporting Guidance dated 

December 29, 2016 and consists of five sections: program structure, progress in implementing highway safety 

improvement projects, progress in achieving safety outcomes and performance targets, effectiveness of the 

improvements and compliance assessment.

Program Structure

Program Administration

Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. 

The Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) is the agency primarily responsible for the 

implementation of the HSIP program in Oklahoma. ODOT is responsible for funding and tracking the progress 

of HSIP projects. The Traffic Division oversees the HSIP program and is responsible for preparing this annual 

report.

Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? 

 Engineering

How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? 

 Other-Central Office

Funds are divided between the Oklahoma Department of Transportation's Traffic Division and the Agency's 8-

year Construction Plan.

Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP.

Local and tribal road projects do not currently use HSIP funds.

Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) 

Bureaus, Divisions) are involved with HSIP planning.

 Local Aid Programs Office/Division

 Traffic Engineering/Safety

 Other-Rail Programs

Describe coordination with internal partners.

The Traffic Division is responsible for administering a portion of the HSIP funds, which is approximately $12M. 

The remaining funds are distributed within field divisions, Local Government Division, and Rail Programs 

Division. The Traffic Division provides field offices with an annual Collision Digest, which can be used for 

selecting optimal safety project locations.
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 6 of 42

Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning.

 Governors Highway Safety Office

 Law Enforcement Agency

 Local Government Agency 

ODOT confers with the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office in the setting of performance measures. On a caseby-case basis, ODOT will also confer with local governments and enforcement partners.

Describe coordination with external partners.

ODOT confers with the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office annually in establishing performance measure 

targets.

Program Methodology

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP.

 Horizontal Curve

 Intersection

 Median Barrier

 Roadway Departure

 Sign Replacement And Improvement

 Other-Striping

Program: Horizontal Curve

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2018

What is the justification for this program? 

 Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

 Other-Run off road injury/fatal  Traffic

 Lane miles

 Horizontal curvature

 Roadside features

 Other-Speed Limit

 Other-Shoulder width

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

 Excess expected crash frequency with the EB adjustment

 Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

 Probability of specific crash types
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 7 of 42

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

 selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Available funding:2

Cost Effectiveness:1

Program: Intersection

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

 Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

 Other-Angle crashes

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

 Crash frequency

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 8 of 42

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

 selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Other-Crash frequency:1

Program: Median Barrier

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

 Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

 Other-Crossover  Other-Access Control

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

 Crash frequency

 Other-Systemic Approach

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

 selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 9 of 42

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Other-District Selection:1

Program: Roadway Departure

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

 Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

 Other-run off road injury/fatal  Traffic

 Lane miles

 Roadside features

 Other-terrain type

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

 Expected crash frequency with EB adjustment

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

 selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Ranking based on B/C:1
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 10 of 42

Program: Sign Replacement And Improvement

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 

 Other-Safety Infrastructure

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

 Other-Age and Condition of 

Signs

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

 Other-Selection Committee

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

 selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Other-Selection Committee:1

Program: Other-Striping

Date of Program Methodology:1/1/2017

What is the justification for this program? 
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 11 of 42

 Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? 

Funding set-aside

What data types were used in the program methodology? 

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

 Other-Weather 

related/nighttime

What project identification methodology was used for this program? 

 Other-District Selection

 Other-Selection Committee

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this 

program?

No

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

 Other-District Selection

 selection committee

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods 

selected, indicate the relative importance of each process in project prioritization. 

Enter either the weights or numerical rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must 

equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving both processes the same rank 

and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Other-District Selection:1

Other-Selection Committee:2

What percentage of HSIP funds address systemic improvements? 

 14.9

 HSIP funds are used to address which of the following systemic 

improvements? 

 Cable Median Barriers 

 High friction surface treatment 
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 12 of 42

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? 

 Crash data analysis

 Data-driven safety analysis tools (HSM, CMF Clearinghouse, SafetyAnalyst, usRAP)

 Engineering Study

 Road Safety Assessment

 SHSP/Local road safety plan

 Stakeholder input

Does the State HSIP consider connected vehicles and ITS technologies? 

Yes

Describe how the State HSIP considers connected vehicles and ITS technologies. 

Can be considered during the engineering design phase of projects.

Does the State use the Highway Safety Manual to support HSIP efforts?

Yes

Please describe how the State uses the HSM to support HSIP efforts.

ODOT uses crash modification factors to evaluate potential countermeasures for a project. ODOT uses an 

Empirical Bayes predictive method is used to evaluate potential benefits of projects.
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 13 of 42

Project Implementation

Funds Programmed

Reporting period for HSIP funding.

Federal Fiscal Year

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category.

FUNDING CATEGORY PROGRAMMED OBLIGATED % 

OBLIGATED/PROGRAMMED

HSIP (23 U.S.C. 148) $37,793,800 $17,207,759 45.53%

HRRR Special Rule (23 

U.S.C. 148(g)(1))

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

154)

$0 $0 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 

164)

$14,019,809 $13,981,379 99.73%

RHCP (for HSIP 

purposes) (23 U.S.C. 

130(e)(2))

$0 $0 0%

Other Federal-aid Funds 

(i.e. STBG, NHPP)

$237,319,193 $237,261,382 99.98%

State and Local Funds $0 $0 0%

Totals $289,132,802 $268,450,520 92.85%

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) or tribal 

safety projects?

0%

How much funding is obligated to local or tribal safety projects?

0%

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$3,465,718

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects?

$2,783,654

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas 

during the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

0%
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 14 of 42

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during 

the reporting period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

0%

Discuss impediments to obligating HSIP funds and plans to overcome this challenge in 

the future.

Impediment: Having staff with expertise to prioritize projects using up-to-date statistical methods and other 

valid technical criteria. 

Plan to Overcome: Hire knowledgeable staff or provide adequate training.
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 15 of 42

General Listing of Projects

List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period.

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

196406 Roadway Roadway -

restripe to revise 

separation 

between 

opposing lanes 

and/or shoulder 

widths 

1 Miles $0 $4471365 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 8,200 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

637459 Roadway Roadway - other 1.1 Miles $0 $2446919 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate88,500 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Right Of Way

903309 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Miles $0 $1000000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate83,000 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Right Of Way

2031105 Roadway Roadway - other 10 Miles $0 $483666 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,200 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Right Of Way

2089504 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Miles $-624529.01 $8390079.99 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,000 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2099705 Roadway Roadway - other 5.75 Miles $0 $2975000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 9,240 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Right Of Way

2099711 Noninfrastructure Transportation 

safety planning

10 Miles $0 $1963100 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther9,241 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety Planning

2099718 Roadway Roadway - other 0.2 Miles $-146929.34 $3400228 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Major Collector 6,200 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2103405 Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

Advanced 

technology and 

ITS - other

5 ITS 

MAINTENANCE 

& 

OPERATIONS

$-686747.99 $733390 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate123,547 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot None ITS 

Operations

2190904 Roadway Roadway - other 0.04 Miles $0 $1577684 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 5,100 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2191804 Roadway Roadway - other 0.05 Miles $-35195.87 $2501679 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 4,160 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 16 of 42

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

2317009 Roadside Barrier- metal 3 Locations $4872 $321598 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther14,400 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Guardrail 

Replacement

2324307 Roadway Roadway - 

restripe to revise 

separation 

between 

opposing lanes 

and/or shoulder 

widths 

1 Miles $0 $2870382 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 863 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown Roadway 

Departure

Bridge 

Projects

2370806 Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection 

traffic control - 

other

1 Miles $0 $122082.87 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Local Road or 

Street

0 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal

2394404 Railroad grade 

crossings

Upgrade railroad 

crossing signal

0.1 Miles $-53069.09 $755725 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Local Road or 

Street

0 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot None Railroad 

Crossing

2394504 Railroad grade 

crossings

Upgrade railroad 

crossing signal

0.1 Miles $-0.94 $152585 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Local Road or 

Street

0 0 City or 

Municipal 

Highway 

Agency

Spot None Railroad 

Crossing

2413204 Alignment Horizontal curve 

realignment

1 Miles $-241498.83 $3642761.96 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,030 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Horizontal 

Curve

2414704 Roadway Roadway - other 0.5 Miles $1083683 $6057460 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,274 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2421907 Roadway Roadway - other 5.09 Miles $0 $1430029 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther4,800 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Planning

2422810 Intersection 

geometry

Intersection 

geometry - other

0.24 Miles $0 $3944578 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 4,461 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Modification

2432307 Roadway Roadway - other 3.1 Miles $-451129 $14712440 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,200 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2436605 Roadway Roadway - other 6.05 Miles $0 $3993000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,377 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Right Of Way

2436606 Roadway Roadway - other 6.05 Miles $-235339.03 $2979360 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,377 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Utilities
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 17 of 42

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

2555212 Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

Advanced 

technology and 

ITS - other

1 ITS 

MAINTENANCE 

& 

OPERATIONS

$-0.46 $690362 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot None ITS 

Operations

2555213 Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

Advanced 

technology and 

ITS - other

1 ITS 

MAINTENANCE 

& 

OPERATIONS

$-113391.39 $786609 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot None ITS 

Operations

2590948 Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

Advanced 

technology and 

ITS - other

1 ITS 

MAINTENANCE 

& 

OPERATIONS

$0 $3998018 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot None ITS 

Operations

2617804 Roadway Roadway - other 0.2 Miles $-214405.41 $3653430 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,700 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2626504 Roadside Barrier - cable 5 Miles $0 $0 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate20,509 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

2634804 Roadway Roadway - other 0.1 Miles $-4600.79 $1151718 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,175 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2649504 Roadway Roadway - other 0.51 Miles $0 $1420318 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 700 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2700506 Roadside Barrier - cable 3 Locations $-32098.4 $228284 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate6,300 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

2700507 Lighting Intersection 

lighting

0.57 Miles $-22871.77 $101874 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate4,700 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Unknown Intersections None

2707404 Roadway Roadway - other 0.25 Miles $392479 $4321530 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,700 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2714204 Roadway Roadway - other 0.2 Miles $-414181.99 $6886121 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,280 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2716704 Intersection 

traffic control

Intersection 

traffic control - 

other

0.55 Miles $0 $3271022 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate10,952 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal

2803204 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Miles $0 $2729379 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 400 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 18 of 42

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

2803804 Roadway Roadway - other 0.88 Miles $-151995.29 $5000000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,000 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2882804 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Miles $0 $18234167.25 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,700 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2883411 Roadway Roadway - other 2.38 Miles $-35542.23 $196644 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 4,400 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Modification

2896108 Roadway Roadway - other 0.25 Miles $-8287 $82878 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate22,600 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2896704 Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - 

add left-turn lane

4.7 Miles $93917.04 $1096320.05 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate575 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Left-turn lane

2907607 Roadway Roadway - other 0.2 Miles $-26664 $133320 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

40,500 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2918604 Roadside Barrier - cable 5.2 Miles $175096 $410165 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate12,000 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

2918904 Roadside Barrier - cable 6.6 Miles $0 $2248402 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate16,200 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

2944804 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Miles $0 $1969922 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 832 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2971404 Roadway Roadway - other 0.6 Miles $-156861 $2165793 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,968 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

2976004 Roadside Barrier - cable 3.51 Miles $437201.2 $3233070.25 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther21,029 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3017304 Roadside Barrier - cable 16.5 Miles $-122937.72 $1732652 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther13,900 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3027004 Roadside Barrier - cable 6 Miles $-111551.66 $1489405 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther22,500 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3057107 Intersection 

geometry

Intersection 

geometry - other

0.5 Miles $1120956 $1401195 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther20,400 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Intersection 

Modification
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 19 of 42

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3085104 Roadside Barrier - cable 5.5 Miles $59.13 $1687339 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther3,100 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3093504 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

26.31 Miles $-131795.92 $154371 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther8,500 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3099804 Roadway Roadway - other 0.5 Miles $0 $16264089.77 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther7,500 25 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Bridge 

Projects

3147304 Roadside Barrier- metal 6 Miles $-18909.75 $182273 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther11,500 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Guardrail 

Replacement

3164004 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

39.85 Miles $-34965.8 $382850 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialInterstate23,700 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3168004 Roadway Roadway - other 1.8 Miles $0 $458905 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,500 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Clearzone 

Mitigation

3169104 Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

Advanced 

technology and 

ITS - other

1 ITS 

MAINTENANCE 

& 

OPERATIONS

$0 $300000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot None ITS 

Operations

3210607 Roadway Roadway - other 0.5 Miles $352220 $440276 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate21,200 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Access 

Improvements

3243004 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

0.01 Miles $-0.74 $111477 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

18,400 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal

3248404 Roadside Barrier- metal 9.11 Miles $39270 $2710724 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 16,960 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Guardrail 

Replacement

3248504 Roadside Barrier - cable 2.3 Miles $-34694.98 $756077 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

38,360 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3248604 Roadside Barrier - cable 4 Miles $8591 $724954.77 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther52,040 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3256304 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

0.54 Miles $0 $33412 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther12,300 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 20 of 42

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3262504 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

36.73 Miles $2112472.55 $5397580.55 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate146,700 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety Lane 

Departure

Signing

3262604 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

14.47 Miles $733782.5 $733782.5 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialInterstate106,500 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety Lane 

Departure

Signing

3265904 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

23.2 Miles $0 $445000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther21,200 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3266204 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

60.29 Miles $0 $349000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther6,600 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3266504 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

20.09 Miles $0 $202000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther13,500 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3267104 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

4.1 Miles $-2760.27 $59842 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther9,900 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3267204 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

23.76 Miles $0 $250000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther34,500 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3267404 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

13.24 Miles $66221.6 $264391 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate89,800 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3267504 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

28.7 Miles $0 $364900 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

28,300 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3270204 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

0.2 Miles $487393 $609243 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther12,400 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal

3274504 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1.01 Miles $-105253 $928709 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther6,400 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3279804 Roadway Rumble strips - 

center

14.87 Miles $0 $85813 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 11,600 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

Centerline 

Rumble Strip
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 21 of 42

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3279805 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

13.1 Miles $0 $65987 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,900 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3283804 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.5 Miles $456588.12 $456588.12 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 3,000 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3287604 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

497.03 Miles $-37468.92 $530692 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate120,300 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety Roadway 

Departure

Signing

3290504 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 1 Miles $57029 $239760 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,400 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3293504 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.51 Miles $-8927 $169908 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther9,100 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3293704 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.66 Miles $232729.02 $232729.02 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 5,800 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3293804 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.25 Miles $8083 $90731 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther13,500 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3293904 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.95 Miles $236406.38 $236406.38 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther12,600 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3294004 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.8 Miles $-126632 $134042 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,600 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3294804 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.3 Miles $619480.91 $619480.91 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 3,700 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3295204 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.6 Miles $-64466 $528090 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther14,600 40 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3295604 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 4.76 Miles $560275.69 $560275.69 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther8,500 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3296704 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.06 Miles $15182 $101077 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,800 25 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 22 of 42

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3307704 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

0.1 Miles $-1921.76 $151104 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

22,100 50 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal

3307804 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

0.1 Miles $5476.11 $183751.04 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther15,280 30 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal

3309504 Roadside Barrier - cable 5 Miles $34557 $1208221 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

18,400 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3312104 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Statewide $250000 $473427 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Planning

3315904 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

0.02 Miles $24157.16 $180872 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther7,500 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal

3323604 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

42.08 Miles $5584 $359584 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialOther16,900 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3325004 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

27.51 Miles $31312 $364312 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther18,800 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3325204 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

72.04 Miles $76177.55 $711881.92 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther Freeways & 

Expressways

22,000 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety Roadway 

Departure

Signing

3325304 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

0.3 Miles $814.37 $26455 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 2,300 45 State 

Highway 

Agency

Request None School Zone

3325404 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

0.1 Miles $4499 $267187.61 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialOther19,750 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal

3329604 Roadway Rumble strips - 

center

8.6 Miles $-7256.44 $56474 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 1,500 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

Centerline 

Rumble Strip

3329704 Roadway Rumble strips - 

center

5.3 Miles $-8822.28 $14744 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther3,000 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

Centerline 

Rumble Strip

3329804 Roadway Rumble strips - 

center

11 Miles $-52838.94 $170775 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther9,200 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane 

Departure

Centerline 

Rumble Strip
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 23 of 42

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3330204 Roadway Pavement 

surface - high 

friction surface

3.4 Miles $0 $451793.51 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 4,600 55 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane 

Departure

Curve 

Treatment

3336004 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

31.77 Miles $-105674.29 $333836 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Principal ArterialInterstate28,500 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3341004 Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Install sidewalk 0.5 Miles $155677.86 $155677.86 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Minor Arterial 2,200 25 State 

Highway 

Agency

Mobility Pedestrians ADA 

Compliance

3347804 Roadside Barrier - cable 7.07 Miles $2120706.79 $2120706.79 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther8,000 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3347904 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

0.2 Miles $1587 $26700 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,500 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Request None School Zone

3348704 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

1 Statewide $250000 $300000 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Multiple/Varies Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Request None School Zone

3360604 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

and traffic control 

- other

0.01 Miles $9302 $177702.61 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Minor Arterial 18,600 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Traffic Signal

3360704 Roadside Barrier - cable 8 Miles $99267 $1657042 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther8,900 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Cable Barrier

3370304 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

0.5 Miles $-6142 $18634 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Major Collector 1,500 35 State 

Highway 

Agency

Request None School Zone

3373004 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

38.7 Miles $874500 $2143495.15 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate13,100 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3373204 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

45.16 Miles $74354 $447254 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialOther2,500 65 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping

3386004 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

1 Division $2884672.9 $3605841.13 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate19,600 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety Roadway 

Departure

Signing

3396007 Railroad grade 

crossings

Upgrade railroad 

crossing signal

1 Locations $200299 $445110 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Local Road or 

Street

0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Spot None Railroad 

Crossing
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 24 of 42

PROJECT 

NAME

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE

HSIP 

PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

LAND 

USE/AREA 

TYPE

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP

METHOD 

FOR SITE 

SELECTION

SHSP 

EMPHASIS 

AREA

SHSP 

STRATEGY

3408904 Roadway Roadway - other 1 Statewide $230055.47 $230055.47 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Multiple/Varies 0 0 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety None Planning

3414404 Roadway signs 

and traffic 

control

Roadway signs 

(including post) - 

new or updated

55.79 Miles $2496292.44 $2496292.44 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Rural Principal ArterialInterstate33,600 70 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy/Safety Roadway 

Departure

Signing

3414904 Roadway 

delineation

Longitudinal 

pavement 

markings - 

remarking

15.3 Miles $2722837.99 $2722837.99 HSIP (23 

U.S.C. 148)

Urban Principal ArterialInterstate133,100 60 State 

Highway 

Agency

Policy Lane 

Departure

Striping
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 25 of 42

Safety Performance

General Highway Safety Trends

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the State for the past five 

years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Fatalities 696 709 678 669 645 687 657 655 640

Serious Injuries 3,598 3,502 3,072 3,042 2,826 2,788 2,645 2,452 2,225

Fatality rate (per 

HMVMT)

1.470 1.480 1.410 1.400 1.352 1.402 1.330 1.442 1.433

Serious injury rate (per 

HMVMT)

7.580 7.340 6.400 6.380 5.923 5.688 5.354 5.397 4.983

Number non-motorized 

fatalities

53 73 74 56 74 96 90 80 101

Number of nonmotorized serious 

injuries

207 192 192 183 213 212 198 166 189
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 26 of 42

600

620

640

660

680

700

720

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Annual Fatalities

Fatalities 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Annual Serious Injuries

Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 27 of 42

1.25

1.3

1.35

1.4

1.45

1.5

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Fatality rate (per HMVMT)

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 28 of 42

Describe fatality data source. 

Other

If Other Please describe

Oklahoma Highway Safety Office

To the maximum extent possible, present this data by functional classification and 

ownership. 

Year 2019

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - 

Interstate

42 108.2 0.78 2.02

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Rural Principal 

Arterial (RPA) - Other

75 190 1.43 3.63

Rural Minor Arterial 85.4 189.4 2.88 6.4

Rural Minor Collector 2.2 8.4 1.26 4.82

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Non Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Fatalities Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 29 of 42

Functional 

Classification

Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Major Collector 131.6 388 2.36 6.97

Rural Local Road or 

Street

56.8 215.6 2.25 8.53

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - 

Interstate

43 163 0.76 2.88

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

18.6 99.2 0.59 3.18

Urban Principal 

Arterial (UPA) - Other

67.6 437.6 1.19 7.7

Urban Minor Arterial 52.6 368.4 1.06 7.42

Urban Minor Collector 0 1.6 0 1.75

Urban Major Collector 18 107.8 1.19 7.14

Urban Local Road or 

Street

53.2 245 1.61 7.09
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 30 of 42

Year 2019

Roadways Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

State Highway 

Agency

280.6 975.2 1.05 3.66

County Highway 

Agency

Town or Township 

Highway Agency

City or Municipal 

Highway Agency

State Park, Forest, or 

Reservation Agency

Local Park, Forest or 

Reservation Agency

Other State Agency

Other Local Agency 225 1,210 1.33 7.13

Private (Other than 

Railroad)

Railroad

State Toll Authority 24 63.6 0.67 1.78

Local Toll Authority

Other Public 

Instrumentality (e.g. 

Airport, School, 

University)

Indian Tribe Nation

Safety Performance Targets

Safety Performance Targets

Calendar Year 2021 Targets *

Number of Fatalities:681.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

This target was set by the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office using an ARIMA model. Oklahoma is on track for 

meeting the SHSP goal of 687 fatalities by 2023.
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 31 of 42

Number of Serious Injuries:2462.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

This target was set by the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office using an ARIMA model. Serious injuries in 

Oklahoma are on a downward trend, but the current rate of decrease is not enough to meet the SHSP goal of 

2013 serious injuries by 2023. However, there may be a significant change to the trajectory of the trend line 

due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Fatality Rate:1.420

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

This target was set by the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office using an ARIMA model. The fatality rate in 

Oklahoma is on a mostly flat/slightly downward trend. The current rate of decrease is not enough to meet the 

SHSP goal of a fatality rate of 1.34 by 2023. However, there may be a significant change to the trajectory of 

the trend line due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Serious Injury Rate:5.290

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

This target was set by the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office using an ARIMA model. The serious injury rate in 

Oklahoma is on a downward trend, but not enough to meet the SHSP goal of 4.90 by 2023. However, there 

may be a significant change to the trajectory of the trend line due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Total Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries:251.0

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals.

This target was set by the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office using an ARIMA model. Oklahoma is already 

meeting the non-motorized fatality and serious injury goal of 338 injuries by 2023.

Describe efforts to coordinate with other stakeholders (e.g. MPOs, SHSO) to establish 

safety performance targets. 

Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) collaborates with the Oklahoma Highway Safety Office 

(OHSO) on the setting of performance targets. For the past several years, OHSO has used an ARIMA model 

produced from a local university to set the targets. OHSO and ODOT jointly review the results of the ARIMA 

model before setting the official targets each year.

Does the State want to report additional optional targets? 

No

Describe progress toward meeting the State’s 2019 Safety Performance Targets (based 

on data available at the time of reporting). For each target, include a discussion of any 

reasons for differences in the actual outcomes and targets.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES TARGETS ACTUALS

Number of Fatalities 699.0 656.8

Number of Serious Injuries 2806.0 2587.2
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 32 of 42

Fatality Rate 1.430 1.392

Serious Injury Rate 27.580 5.469

Non-Motorized Fatalities and 

Serious Injuries

812.0 283.8

Oklahoma has met the targets for number of fatalities, number of serious injuries, and fatality rate. Because of 

a change in the definition of serious injuries, the 2018 targets set for serious injury rate and non-motorized 

fatalities and serious injuries are no longer valid. The revised targets for serious injury rate and non-motorized 

fatalities and serious injuries that were generated for the 2019 HSIP were 5.44 and 300 respectively. 

Oklahoma has not met those revised targets.

Applicability of Special Rules

Does the HRRR special rule apply to the State for this reporting period? 

No

Based on the FHWA Table: PENALTY FUNDS AND ASSOCIATED OBLIGATION LIMITATION FOR FISCAL 

YEAR 2020 FOR PENALTY PROVISIONS UNDER SECTIONS 154 AND 164 OF TITLE 23, UNITED STATES 

CODE, Oklahoma has 0 penalty for Section 154 and 164.

Provide the number of older driver and pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries 65 

years of age and older for the past seven years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Fatalities

73 95 83 76 87 94 78

Number of Older Driver 

and Pedestrian Serious 

Injuries

223 191 217 225 192 210 166
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 33 of 42

Evaluation

Program Effectiveness

How does the State measure effectiveness of the HSIP?

 Change in fatalities and serious injuries

 Increased awareness of safety and data-driven process

Based on the measures of effectiveness selected previously, describe the results of 

the State's program level evaluations.

Fatalities are showing a slight downward trend, and serious injuries are showing a significant downward trend. 

However, it is unclear what impact the current pandemic will have on these trends going forward.

What other indicators of success does the State use to demonstrate effectiveness and 

success of the Highway Safety Improvement Program?

 # miles improved by HSIP

 Increased awareness of safety and data-driven process

 More systemic programs

 Policy change

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements

Present and describe trends in SHSP emphasis area performance measures.

Year 2019

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted Crash 

Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury 

Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Lane Departure Includes rollover, 

head-on, fixed 

object, and 

sideswipeopposite 

direction

347.8 1,008.2 0.74 2.13

Roadway Departure Select all except 

"No Roadway 

Departure"

461.6 1,430.8 0.98 3.03

Intersections Int. Rel. = 1 139 930.2 0.29 1.97

Pedestrians Unit Type = P 75 142.6 0.16 0.3

Bicyclists Unit Type = B 9 43.6 0.02 0.09

Older Drivers Driver of Vehicle 

= Y, Age 65+

82.2 200.6 0.17 0.42
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 34 of 42

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted Crash 

Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury 

Rate

 (per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Motorcyclists Vehicle Type = 

15

81.6 293.8 0.17 0.62

Work Zones Work Zone = Y 16.6 56.2 0.04 0.12
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 35 of 42

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities 

5 Year Average

2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries 

5 Year Average

2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 36 of 42

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2011-2015 2012-2016 2013-2017 2014-2018 2015-2019
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 37 of 42

Project Effectiveness

Provide the following information for previously implemented projects that the State evaluated this reporting period. 
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 38 of 42

Compliance Assessment

What date was the State’s current SHSP approved by the Governor or designated State representative?

 04/27/2018

What are the years being covered by the current SHSP?

From: 2018 To: 2022

When does the State anticipate completing it’s next SHSP update?

 2022

Provide the current status (percent complete) of MIRE fundamental data elements collection efforts using the table below. 

*Based on Functional Classification (MIRE 1.0 Element Number) [MIRE 2.0 Element Number]

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

ROADWAY SEGMENT Segment Identifier 

(12) [12]

1 1 1 1 1 1

Route Number (8) 

[8]

1

Route/Street Name 

(9) [9]

1 1

Federal Aid/Route 

Type (21) [21]

1 1

Rural/Urban 

Designation (20) [20]

1 1 1 1

Surface Type (23) 

[24]

1 1 1 1

Begin Point 

Segment Descriptor 

(10) [10]

1 1 1 1 1 1

End Point Segment 

Descriptor (11) [11]

1 1 1 1 1 1

Segment Length 

(13) [13]

1 1

Direction of 

Inventory (18) [18]

1 1

Functional Class 

(19) [19]

1 1 1 1 1 1
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 39 of 42

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Median Type (54) 

[55]

1 1

Access Control (22) 

[23]

1 1

One/Two Way 

Operations (91) [93]

1 1

Number of Through 

Lanes (31) [32]

1 1 1 1

Average Annual 

Daily Traffic (79) [81]

1 1 1 1

AADT Year (80) [82] 1 1

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4) [4]

1 1 1 1 1 1

INTERSECTION Unique Junction 

Identifier (120) [110]

0.05

Location Identifier 

for Road 1 Crossing 

Point (122) [112]

0.05

Location Identifier 

for Road 2 Crossing 

Point (123) [113]

0.05

Intersection/Junction 

Geometry (126) 

[116]

0.05

Intersection/Junction 

Traffic Control (131) 

[131]

0.05

AADT for Each 

Intersecting Road 

(79) [81]

1 1

AADT Year (80) [82] 1 1

Unique Approach 

Identifier (139) [129]

0.05

INTERCHANGE/RAMP Unique Interchange 

Identifier (178) [168]

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 40 of 42

ROAD TYPE *MIRE NAME (MIRE 

NO.)

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (197) [187]

Location Identifier 

for Roadway at 

Ending Ramp 

Terminal (201) [191]

Ramp Length (187) 

[177]

1 1

Roadway Type at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (195) [185]

1

Roadway Type at 

End Ramp Terminal 

(199) [189]

1

Interchange Type 

(182) [172]

Ramp AADT (191) 

[181]

1 1

Year of Ramp AADT 

(192) [182]

1 1

Functional Class 

(19) [19]

1 1

Type of 

Governmental 

Ownership (4) [4]

1 1

Totals (Average Percent Complete): 1.00 0.94 0.29 0.25 0.64 0.45 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

*Based on Functional Classification (MIRE 1.0 Element Number) [MIRE 2.0 Element Number]

Describe actions the State will take moving forward to meet the requirement to have complete access to the MIRE fundamental data elements on all public roads by September 30, 2026. 

The next major step for ODOT with the MIRE data elements will be completion of the intersection data points in the next 1.5 to 2 years. This will be facilitated by ODOT moving to the next iteration of our desktop platform, ESRI's ArcGIS 

Pro, which, in combination with the continued advancement of the LRS Management Software and ESRI's Roads & Highways Package, will allow different elements of the roadway network to talk to each other. Once the intersections are 

done, ODOT will be able to create the interchange identifiers and polygon areas. ODOT is on track to meet the 2026 deadline.
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 41 of 42

Optional Attachments

Program Structure:

Project Implementation:

Safety Performance:

Evaluation:

Compliance Assessment:
2020 Oklahoma Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 42 of 42

Glossary

5 year rolling average: means the average of five individuals, consecutive annual points of data 

(e.g. annual fatality rate).

Emphasis area: means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process.

Highway safety improvement project: means strategies, activities and projects on a public road 

that are consistent with a State strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous 

road location or feature or addresses a highway safety problem.

HMVMT: means hundred million vehicle miles traveled.

Non-infrastructure projects: are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of noninfrastructure projects include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, 

improvements in the collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement 

activities.

Older driver special rule: applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and 

pedestrians over the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which 

data are available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance 

dated February 13, 2013.

Performance measure: means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to 

monitor changes in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and 

objectives.

Programmed funds: mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects.

Roadway Functional Classification: means the process by which streets and highways are 

grouped into classes, or systems, according to the character of service they are intended to provide.

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP): means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on 

safety data developed by a State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148.

Systematic: refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across 

a system.

Systemic safety improvement: means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high 

risk roadway features that are correlated with specific severe crash types.

Transfer: means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal 

year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.