alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS H 

WASHINGTON, DC 

10 2016 

In the Matter of: FAA DOCKET No. Not Assigned 

Federal Express Corporation 

Respondent 

Judge Douglas M. Rawald 

FAA Case No.2014SW700042 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FDMS No. 2014-0864 

WITHDRAWAL OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 

NOW COMES the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter 

"FAA") through counsel pursuant to Rule 215 of the Rules of 

Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions, 14 CFR § 13.215. 

Pursuant to Rule 215, the Federal Aviation Administration hereby 

withdraws its Second Amended Complaint in this matter. It 

states the following: 

1. On November 24, 2015, the Federal Aviation Administration 

filed its Second Amended Complaint. 

2. Since the filing of its Second Amended Complaint, we have 

reviewed this matter. We find that legal enforcement action in 

this case is not warranted. Accordingly, we hereby withdraw the 

Second Amended Complaint. 

r''\ 

~=1p 
Patricia A. McNall 

Acting Assistant Chief Counsel 

for Enforcement 

, ,/') I 

Cy"~"'~~ / J ~es Archier, Senror Attorney 

// nforcement Division, Southwest Team 

/ Federal Aviation Administration 

/ 10101 Hillwood Parkway 

Fort Worth, Texas 76177 

E-mail: james.archier@faa.gov 

Telephone: (817) 222-5099 (Main) 

(817) 222-5074 (Direct) 

(817) 222-5945 (Fax) 

2 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Re: Federal Express Corporation, FAA Case No. 2014SW700042 

I hereby certify that on this day, I have sent via Federal 

Express an executed original and one copy of the Withdrawal of 

Second Amended Complaint, addressed as follows: 

Hearing Docket 

Attention Hearing Docket Clerk 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington DC 20591 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

I further certify that on this date, I have sent via 

Federal Express a true copy of the Withdrawal of Second Amended 

Complaint, addressed as follows to: 

TEL: (202) 393-9285 

FAX: (202) 628-0654 

Mr. Greg G. Stofko 

Senior Attorney 

Regulatory Affairs 

Federal Express Corporation 

1700 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Suite 950 

Washington, DC 20006 

EMAIL: greg.stofko@fedex.com 

TEL: (202) 496-7356 

Allan H. Horowitz 

McKenna Long & Alridge LLP 

1900 K Street, NW 

Washington DC 20006 

EMAIL: ahorowitz@mckennalong.com 

3 
The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

Patricia A. McNall 

Acting Assistant Chief Counsel 

for Enforcement 

s Archier, 

~~· Senior Attorney 

Enfo cement Division, Southwest 

Fe ral Aviation Administration 

0101 Hillwood Parkway 

Fort Worth, Texas 76177 

E-mail: james.archier@faa.gov 

Telephone: (817) 222-5099 (Main) 

(817) 222-5074 (Direct) 

(817) 222-5945 (Fax) 

4 

Dated: May 17, 2016
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 

Standard Operating Permit Condition VIII – Visible 

Emissions and Particulate Matter Monitoring Plan 

for Gas-Fired Fuel Burning Equipment 

Permit Condition for Air Quality Permits 

Adopted by Reference in 18 AAC 50.346 

April 1, 2002 

REVISED August 25, 2004
Standard Operating Permit Condition VIII – 

Visible Emissions and Particulate Matter Monitoring 

Plan for Gas-Fired Fuel Burning Equipment 1 April 1, 2002 

Revised August 25, 2004

Standard Operating Permit Condition VIII –Visible Emissions and 

Particulate Matter Monitoring Plan for Gas-Fired Fuel Burning 

Equipment 

Emission Unit [SOURCE] or Stationary Source [FACILITY] Categories This 

Condition Applies to: Gas-fired fuel burning equipment subject to the opacity standard of 18 

AAC 50.055(a)(1), except flares. 

The department will use standard operating permit condition VIII in any operating permit unless 

the department determines that emission unit [SOURCE] or stationary source [FACILITY] 

specific conditions more adequately meet the requirements of 18 AAC 50. 

Circumstances where emission unit [SOURCE] or stationary source 

[FACILITY] specific conditions more adequately meet 18 AAC 50 include: 

1. if the department finds that equipment may not adequately eliminate entrained liquid. 

Permit Wording:

 

1. Visible Emissions. The permittee shall not cause or allow visible emissions, excluding 

condensed water vapor, emitted from <identify emission units [SOURCES]> to reduce 

visibility through the exhaust effluent by more than 20 percent averaged over any six 

consecutive minutes. (18 AAC 50.055(a)(1)) 

1.1 Monitoring, Record Keeping, and Reporting. 

a. The permittee shall use only gas as fuel in emission units [SOURCES] 

<emission unit [SOURCE] citations>. The permittee shall certify in each 

operating report required under condition <insert cross reference to standard 

permit condition VII - operating reports> that the emission unit [SOURCE] 

burned only gas. 

b. The permittee shall report under condition <insert cross reference to standard 

permit condition III - excess emissions and permit deviation reports> if any 

fuel is burned other than gas. 

2. Particulate Matter Emissions. In accordance with 18 AAC 50.055(b)(1), the permittee 

shall not cause or allow particulate matter emitted from <identify emission units

[SOURCES] > to exceed 0.05 grains per cubic foot of exhaust gas corrected to standard 

conditions and averaged over three hours. 
Standard Operating Permit Condition VIII – 

Visible Emissions and Particulate Matter Monitoring 

Plan for Gas-Fired Fuel Burning Equipment 2 April 1, 2002 

Revised August 25, 2004

2.1 Monitoring, Record Keeping, and Reporting. The permittee shall comply with 

condition VIII.1.1.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Manfred Gingl, the Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Tesma International Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
hereby certify that:

|Dated: May 20, 2003. |  |                                                                                                   
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/ MANFRED
GINGL
Manfred Gingl
Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Tesma International Inc.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25813]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-116-006]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

September 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 19, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline 
Company (``Koch'') tendered for filing the following tariff sheets in 
its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, to be effective 
January 1, 1997:

Fifth Revised Volume No. 1

Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 1410
Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 1411
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 1412
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 1413
Second Revised Sheet No. 1414

    Koch is submitting the above-referenced tariff sheets pursuant to 
the Commission's Letter Order dated September 16, 1997, regarding 
Docket No. RP97-116-005. As directed, Koch has revised the tariff 
sheets to allow Customers requesting new firm transportation thirty 
(30) days to execute a service agreement under certain circumstances.
    Koch also states that it has served copies of this filing upon each 
person on the official service list complied by the Secretary in the 
proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
regulations. All such motions or protest must be filed as provided in 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining appropriate action to be 
taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25813 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### STATE of Louisiana Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 6278.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Feb. 6, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 29, 1978.

Sanders, Downing, Kean & Cazdessus by R. Gordon Kean, Jr., Baton Rouge, Plauche, Smith, Hebert & Nieset by Reid K. Hebert, Lake Charles, for defendants-appellants.

Jonathan C. Harris, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GUIDRY, FORET and JOHNSON, JJ.

FORET, Judge.

For the reasons stated in the companion case of *State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Highways v. National Advertising Company,*356 So.2d 557 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1978), in which a separate decision has been rendered by us on this date, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed to the appellants in these consolidated cases, each appellant to bear costs equal to the proportion which the number of signs in issue owned by its bears to the total number of signs in issue owned by all the appellants.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1

J.H Cohn & Company

  75 EISENHOWER PARKWAY                                        LAWRENCEVILLE, NJ
  ROSELAND, NJ 07068-1697                                      NEW YORK, NY
  (201) 228-3500                                               ROSELAND, NJ
                                                               SAN DIEGO, CA


                                                August 7, 1995

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

RE: Skylands Park Management, Inc. (File No. 0-22042)

Gentlemen:

We were previously the principal accountants for Skylands Park Management, Inc.
(the "Company") and on March 17, 1995 we reported on the financial statements of
the Company as of December 31, 1994 and 1993 and for the years ended December
31, 1994, 1993 and 1992. On August 2, 1995 we were informed that we were
dismissed as the principal accountants for the Company. We have read the
Company's statements included pursuant to Item 4 in its Form 8-K Current Report
dated August 7, 1995. At the request of the Company, we hereby state that we
agree with the statements included in the second and third paragraphs thereof
that relate to our firm.

                                                       Very truly yours,


                                                       /s/ J.H. Cohn & Company
                                                       -----------------------
                                                           J.H. COHN & COMPANY
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.127


SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT




THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 24th day of September, 2015, by and between GEORGETOWN HC&R PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“Lessor”) and BLUE RIDGE IN GEORGETOWN, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company (“Tenant”).  


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, Lessor and Tenant are parties to that certain lease dated February 27, 2015, as amended pursuant to that certain First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated March 20, 2015 (as amended, the “Lease”), whereby Tenant leased certain improved property located at 2175 South Island Road, Georgetown, South Carolina 29440; and 


WHEREAS, Lessor and Tenant desire to further amend the Lease as hereinafter set forth.
    
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, paid by each party to the other, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and the mutual covenants and benefits flowing between the parties, Lessor and Tenant, intending to be legally bound, do hereby covenant and agree as follows:


1.Capitalized Terms.  Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized words and phrases used herein shall have the same meanings ascribed to them in the Lease.


2.Base Rent.  Section 2.1(a) of the Lease is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is inserted in lieu thereof:


2.1     Base Rent.  
(a)    Lease Year One.  Commencing on October 1, 2015, Base Rent shall be Twenty-Six Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($26,000.00) per month.
3.Agreement in Effect.  Except as herein specifically provided, all other terms and provisions of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect, and are hereby ratified and reaffirmed by the parties.








[SIGNATURES COMMENCE ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]

HNZW//3583-1






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.




LESSOR:




GEORGETOWN HC&R PROPERTY 
HOLDINGS, LLC,
a Georgia limited liability company 


 
By:    /s/ William McBride
Name:    William McBride
Title:    Manager








LESSEE:




BLUE RIDGE IN GEORGETOWN, LLC,
a South Carolina limited liability company  




By:    /s/ Levi Rudd
Name:    Levi Rudd
Title:    CEO



HNZW//3583-1    2
#### Robert Earl HARRIS v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 46113.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 18, 1971.

Constance Iona Slaughter, Jackson, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by John M. Kinard, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.22

                    [LETTERHEAD OF SIR WILFRID NEWTON CBE]

14 October 1998


Mr D N Odgers
Australia

Dear David.

                       Guy Maunsell International Limited
                       ---------------------------------
                 Group Chief Executive -  Terms of Employment
                 --------------------------------------------

I am writing to confirm the terms of your appointment when you take up your
position as Group Chief Executive based in London. I shall be grateful if you
will sign and return the copy of this letter, which is enclosed.

The terms which have been agreed between us, are as follows:

1.  Salary:
    (L) 140,000 per annum subject to annual review.

2. Housing Allowance:
   A contribution towards housing cost up to (L) 1,000 per week (note
   personal tax will have to be paid on this allowance.)

3. Car Allowance:
   (L) 10,000 per annum.

4. Annual Leave:
   25 working days per annum.

5. Superannuation:
   You will continue to be a member of the Australian scheme and GMIL will make
   the employer's contribution.

6. Health Cover:
   As for UK directors for you and your wife.



<PAGE>


                                      -2-
7.   Home Leave Travel:
     Two business class return fares in each year for your wife and one for
     yourself.

8.   Re-Location Cost:
     GMIL will reimburse reasonable cost of your move to London and your
     eventual return to Australia.

9.   Term of Appointment:
     The term of your appointment is for three years. You will be required to
     give 6 months notice of your intention to leave the company's employment
     and the company in turn will give you one year's notice if it wishes to
     terminate your employment before completion of your three year term. If the
     Company wishes to extend your term beyond three years it will discuss and
     agree any extension with you one year before completion of your three year
     term.

You will, I am confident, fill the post of Group Chief Executive with
distinction and I wish you great success for the future.

With kind regards.


/s/ Wilfrid Newton

Wilfrid Newton


Acceptance Confirmed
--------------------

/s/ D N Odgers

D N Odgers
EXHIBIT 21.0

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
--------------------------

I.       IN & OUT MINI MART, INC.
         100% Owned Subsidiary
         Incorporated in the State of Texas

II.      DIAMOND MINI MART, INC.
         100% Owned Subsidiary of In & Out Mini Mart, Inc.
         Incorporated in the State of Texas

III.     EVANS OIL COMPANY, INC.
         100% Owned Subsidiary
         Incorporated in the State of Texas

IV.      EDCO, INC.
         19% Owned Subsidiary of Evans Systems, Inc.
         81% Owned Subsidiary of Evans Oil Company, Inc.
         Incorporated in the State of Texas

V.       WAY ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
         100% Owned Subsidiary
         Incorporated in the State of Delaware

VI.      EDCO ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
         100% Owned Subsidiary Incorporated in
         the State of Texas

VII.     DISTRIBUTOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION
         100% Owned Subsidiary
         Incorporated in the State of Texas
CLEARCHANNEL ' •''^Sffl'; ^ ^ 

OUTDOOR . -

August 20, 2010 

Keith Livingston 

Senior Accoimt Executive 

Clear Charmel Outdoor-Oca la/Gainesville Divisiou 

731 SW 37"^ Aveiiue 

Ocala,FL 34474 

Jie: Small Community Aiv Service Development Grant 

To whom it may conccra. 

Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. fiilly suppoils the Gaincsville-Alaohua County Regional Airport Authority's 

request for a Small Community Aii" Service Development grant to help support the new American Eagle 

Airlmes service between Gainesville and Miami and the existing local air carriers. Delta Air Lines and 

US Airways. We recognize the importance of au: sci-vice to economic development and the quality of life 

for residents and visitors in .our region. 

We want to lielp ensure the success of the new American Aii'lines service between Gainesville and the 

Miami hub. We arc aheady working closely with the Airport Authority and matching fluids spent. The 

lack of an service to South Florida and adequate connecting service to international destinations has 

forced many to commute to and from other ahports or make the exhausting 5+ hour trip to Miami by 

automobile. Additionally, American's extensive domestic and international route structure from Miami 

will provide new travel options and a greater level of frequency. 

Due to the critical importance of quality air service for our region, wc arc committed to supporting 

American's new service and continued improvement in air service. Therefore, "we will provide matching 

space equivalent to dollars spent with Clear Channel Outdoor-Ocala/Gauiesville Division to help 

American Au-lines establish its new route between GNV and MIA. With reaching over 1.2 million people 

every four (4) weeks, we believe our donation for advertising will help make the new service successful. 

I urge you to proceed with approving the Airport Authority's request for a grant to assist with marketmg 

efforts for the next two years. If you have any questions about Clear Channel Outdoor-Oca la/Gainesville 

Division, please feel free to contact me at 352--479-6936 

/mgston\ 

Senior Account Executive 

Clear Channel Outdoor-OcaWGainesvillc Division 

KeithLivi ngston@ClearChauncl Outdoor.com 

CletrChtnnel Outdoor 

352 

•^79'6300T.I 

731 S\C 37(h Avenue • OciU, PL S^-l?-! • iyivw.cle»rcli»nnel.com Paee 6(i
Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Technest Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 of the
Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:  August 11, 2004                             By: /s/ MARK ALLEN
                                                       -------------------------
                                                           Mark Allen, Director
#### MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al., Petitioners, v. Catherine T. BENOIT, Respondent.

No. 40224.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 7, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### PICHER v. TAYLOR et al.

No. 3196.

Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Jan. 19, 1937.

F. Harold Dubord, of Waterville, Me., for appellant.

Robert B. Williamson, of Augusta, Me. (W.»R. Pattangall and Pattangall, Williamson & Birkenwald, all of Augusta, Me., on the brief),, for appellees.

Before BINGHAM, WILSON and MORTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We are of the opinion that the District Court erred in its decree in allowing the plaintiffs interest on the sum of $3,567.-98 from March 4, 1933 (the date the Peoples-Ticonic National Bank was taken over), to the date of the decree; that the allowance of $300 as a fee for plaintiffs’ attorney was proper, as the services rendered were beneficial to the preservation of the trust estate, and the representative of the trust estate makes no objection to its allowance; and that the allowance of costs and the direction of the payment of the same by the receiver was proper, but that the sum of $4,031.82 also directed to be paid by the receiver should be reduced to $3,567.98.

In this situation the decree of the Disr trict Court is modified as above stated, and so modified is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          488061
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3699854
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     253101
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4462883
<PP&E>                                           63780
<DEPRECIATION>                                   13289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5723615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           646324
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3271
<OTHER-SE>                                     2837951
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5723615
<SALES>                                        4242574
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2568713
<CGS>                                            33556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    33556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                693000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1842157
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1842157
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1842157
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56


</TABLE>