alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[104th Congress Public Law 183]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ183.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 1694]]

Public Law 104-183
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights 
     Act to extend the Act, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Aug. 6, 
                          1996 -  [S. 1757]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Developmental 
Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act Amendments of 1996.>> 

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 42 USC 6000 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Developmental Disabilities Assistance 
and Bill of Rights Act Amendments of 1996''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF ALLOTMENTS FOR STATES.

    Section 130 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of 
Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6030) is amended by striking ``the fiscal years 
1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 through 1999''.
SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PROTECTION AND 
                    ADVOCACY OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS.

    Section 143 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of 
Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6043) is amended by striking ``the fiscal years 
1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 through 1999''.
SEC. 4. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO UNIVERSITY 
                    AFFILIATED PROGRAMS.

    Section 156(a) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill 
of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6066(a)) is amended by striking ``the fiscal 
years 1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 through 
1999''.

[[Page 110 STAT. 1695]]

SEC. 5. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PROJECTS OF 
                    NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE.

    Section 163(a) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill 
of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6083(a)) is amended by striking ``the fiscal 
years 1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 through 
1999''.

    Approved August 6, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1757 (H.R. 3867):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-719 accompanying H.R. 3867 (Comm. on Commerce).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):
            July 12, considered and passed Senate.
            July 30, H.R. 3867 and S. 1757 considered and passed House.
WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 32 (1996):
            Aug. 6, Presidential statement.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3027 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3027

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the energy credit 
                   for qualified fuel cell property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 4, 2023

Mr. Carper (for himself and Mr. Graham) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the energy credit 
                   for qualified fuel cell property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ENERGY CREDIT FOR QUALIFIED FUEL CELL PROPERTY.

    Section 48(c)(1)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 
by striking ``January 1, 2025'' and inserting ``January 1, 2033''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RICHARD GRANDE, )

Petitioner ) Civil Action No. 06-190 Erie

) District Judge McLaughlin

v. ) Magistrate Judge Baxter

)

GEORGE W. PATRICK, et al., )

Respondents. )

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2006, after Petitioner presented a petition for a

writ of habeas corpus which he seeks leave to prosecute in forma pauperis, and it appearing that

he has an average monthly balance of $ 297.46 in his account at the State Correctional Institution

at Houtzdale, Pennsylvania, which sum far exceeds the $5.00 filing fee required to commence

this action, and it further appearing that requiring the Petitioner to pay the filing fee will not

deprive him of any necessities of life at the prison, 

It is recommended that leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. Petitioner must

pay the filing fee on or before September 23, 2006, or this case will be dismissed for failure to

prosecute.

Petitioner shall have ten (10) days from the date of service in which to file written

objections to this Report and Recommendation. Failure to file timely objections may constitute a

waiver of any appellate rights.

 S/Susan Paradise Baxter 

 SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge

cc: Richard Grande # DN-6842

 SCI Houtzdale 

P.O. Box 1000

Houtzdale, PA 16698-1000

Case 1:06-cv-00190-SJM-SPB Document 2 Filed 08/23/06 Page 1 of 1
#### LOUISIANA LIVESTOCK SANITARY BOARD v. Jesse JOHNSON.

No. 61563.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1978.

In re: Jesse Johnson, applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Evangeline, 335 So.2d 784.

Writ denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26583]



[[Page 52532]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-784-000]


K N Interstate Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

October 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 30, 1997, K N Interstate Gas 
Transmission Company (KNI), Post Office Box 281304, Lakewood, Colorado 
80228-8304, filed a prior notice request with the Commission in Docket 
No. CP97-784-000 pursuant to Section 157.205 of the Commission's 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to 
install and operate two new delivery taps and appurtenant facilities in 
Holt and Sheridan Counties, Nebraska, under KNI's blanket certificates 
issued in Docket Nos. CP83-140-000, CP83-140-001, and CP89-1043-000 
pursuant to Section 7 of the NGA, all as more fully set forth in the 
request which is open to the public for inspection.
    KNI proposes to install and operate both delivery taps under a 
transportation agreement with K N Energy, Inc. (K N Energy). KNI states 
that it would install one tap on its main transmission system in Holt 
County at a cost of $20,000 to deliver approximately 530 Mcf of natural 
gas on a peak day and 193,000 Mcf annually for a retail customer. KNI 
also states that it would install the other tap on its main 
transmission system in Sheridan County at a cost of $1,500 to deliver 
approximately 4 Mcf of natural gas on a peak day and 250 Mcf annually 
for a domestic customer. KNI further states that the addition of the 
proposed taps is not prohibited by its FERC Gas Tariff and that 
addition of the taps would not have any adverse impact on a daily or 
annual basis upon KNI's existing customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If 
no protest is filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity 
shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time 
allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn 
within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of the NGA.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26583 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
sourceTypeIDmonthID roadTypeIDdayID dayVMTFraction

11 7 1 5 0.762365

11 7 2 5 0.762365

11 7 3 5 0.762365

11 7 4 5 0.762365

11 7 5 5 0.762365

21 7 1 5 0.762365

21 7 2 5 0.762365

21 7 3 5 0.762365

21 7 4 5 0.762365

21 7 5 5 0.762365

31 7 1 5 0.762365

31 7 2 5 0.762365

31 7 3 5 0.762365

31 7 4 5 0.762365

31 7 5 5 0.762365

32 7 1 5 0.762365

32 7 2 5 0.762365

32 7 3 5 0.762365

32 7 4 5 0.762365

32 7 5 5 0.762365

41 7 1 5 0.762365

41 7 2 5 0.762365

41 7 3 5 0.762365

41 7 4 5 0.762365

41 7 5 5 0.762365

42 7 1 5 0.762365

42 7 2 5 0.762365

42 7 3 5 0.762365

42 7 4 5 0.762365

42 7 5 5 0.762365

43 7 1 5 0.762365

43 7 2 5 0.762365

43 7 3 5 0.762365

43 7 4 5 0.762365

43 7 5 5 0.762365

51 7 1 5 0.762365

51 7 2 5 0.762365

51 7 3 5 0.762365

51 7 4 5 0.762365

51 7 5 5 0.762365

52 7 1 5 0.762365

52 7 2 5 0.762365

52 7 3 5 0.762365

52 7 4 5 0.762365

52 7 5 5 0.762365

53 7 1 5 0.762365

53 7 2 5 0.762365

53 7 3 5 0.762365

53 7 4 5 0.762365

53 7 5 5 0.762365

54 7 1 5 0.762365
54

725 0.762365

54735 0.762365

54745 0.762365

54755 0.762365

61715 0.762365

61725 0.762365

61735 0.762365

61745 0.762365

61755 0.762365

62715 0.762365

62725 0.762365

62735 0.762365

62745 0.762365

62755 0.762365
Santa Barbara County APCD 3

- 1 September 20, 2010

Public Comm ents and Responses to Comments

- Amended Ru le s 102, 202, and 321 ATTACHMENT 3

PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESP ONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENTS

Comment s from Lyondell Chemical Company, Email Dated August 5, 2010

[COMMENT 1]

As the developer and producer of tertiary

butyl acetate (TBAC) and a supplier of Propylene carbonate (PC), Lyondell Chemical appreciates the opportu nity to comment on the proposed amendments to

Rule 102. We support the County’s proposal to add TBAC and PC to the list of

VOC

- exempt compounds in rule 102. These exemptions are based on sound science and are fully consistent with the 2004 and 2009

EPA r ulemakings.

[RESPONSE TO COMMENT 1]

Propylene carbonate use will not be restricted under the proposed amended Rules. However, the use of tertiary

- butyl acetate in excess of one gallon per year per stationary source will require an Authority

to Construct and Permit to Operate per the proposed amended Rule 202.D.10.l.2 provision. Also, consistent with the EPA regulation on exempting tertiary

- butyl acetate, we have included the following statement in proposed amended Rules 102

and 202:

Tertiary

- butyl acet ate (also known as t

butyl acetate or tBAc) shall be considered exempt as a reactive organic compound only for purposes of reactive organic compound emissions limitations or reactive organic compound content requirements and will continue to be a

reactive organic compound for purposes of all recordkeeping, emissions reporting, photochemical dispersion modeling, and inventory requirements which apply to reactive organic compounds.

[ COMMENT 2 ]

This exemption will not only benefit human

health and the enviro nment but will provide businesses in the County two cost

- effective compliance tools and the County with two

more ways to reduce TAC and VOC emissions and improve air quality.

[RESPONSE TO COMMENT 2 ]

The California State Board has determined

that tBAc is a toxic air contaminant (TAC). Hence, any n ew and increased use of tBAc

will cause an increase in TAC emissions (unless 100 percent controlled)

. Under the proposed amendments, the use of tBAc in a solvent cleaning machine or when performing solvent clea ning will be subject

to Rule 321

.

[ COMMENT 3 ]

We also appreciate the opportunity to work with the County on this important rulemaking.

[RESPONSE TO COMMENT 3 ]

The District appreciates receiving input from stakeholders and being able to develop

mutual ly

- acceptable approaches

.
**EXHIBIT32**

### **INSWEB CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of InsWeb Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toInsWeb Corporation, and will be retained by InsWeb Corporation and furnished tothe Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| **/s/ HUSSEIN A. ENAN**              | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------|------------|
| Hussein A. Enan                      |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| Dated: August 14, 2007               |
|                                 |
|                                 |
| **/s/ KIRAN RASARETNAM**             | ** ** |
| Kiran Rasaretnam                     |
| Chief Financial Officer              |
| Dated : August 14, 2007              |

 

----
Exhibit 32



GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended January 2, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                             
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.                                   
|                     | 
|Date: March 15, 2005 |  | /s/ Geoffrey F. Cox                                         
|                     |  | Geoffrey F. Cox                                             
|                     |  | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer



|                     |  |                                                             
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2005 |  | /s/ John B. Green                                           
|                     |  | John B. Green                                               
|                     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ELIZABETH MARTE, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 06-140 Erie

v. )

)

FDC-PHILADELPHIA, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on June 22, 2006,

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 1], filed on July

23, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition [Doc. No. 1] be transferred to the

Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date

of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on

Respondent. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and

documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following

order is entered:

AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus [Doc. No. 1] is transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 2] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on July 23, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:06-cv-00140-SJM-SPB Document 3 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:04-cv-00369-MBC-SPB Document 78 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 2Case 1:04-cv-00369-MBC-SPB Document 78 Filed 10/17/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Hooker Furniture Corporation (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul B. Toms, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: July 11, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Paul B. Toms, Jr.  
|                    |  |     |  | Paul B. Toms, Jr.      
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer

|
|

|
|
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE U.S SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  I, Bruce E. Schreiner, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report of the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2008 of Sense Technologies, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statement, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15e)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the annual report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.  5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers control over financial reporting.  By: /s/ Bruce E. Schreiner Bruce E. Schreiner Dated January 20, 2009 President and Principal Financial Officer