alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 96-50555 Summary Calendar

_____________________

ROBERT BOHLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

EXPRESS TECH, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(SA-95-CV-770)

_________________________________________________________________ January 23, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Robert Bohler appeals the summary judgment awarded Express

Tech, Inc., his form er employer, on Bohler’s claims under the

Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654; the

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 -12213;

and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 791-793.

The FMLA claim fails because Bohl er presented insufficient

evidence that Express Tech employed over 50 employees, as required

by that act. S ee 29 U.S.C. § 2611(2)(B)(ii). His ADA claim fails- 2 -

because, assuming arguendo that his diabetic conditi on is a

“disability”, he presented no evidence that he requested (and was

denied) reasonable accommodation. S ee 42 U.S.C. § 12112(b)(5)(A).

Finally, as conceded by Bohler in his app ellate brief, the

Rehabilitation Act claim fails because Express Tech is a federal

contractor, and the that Act does not provide a private cause of

action for employees. See 29 U.S.C. § 793(b).

That summary judgment was proper is reflected in the district

court’s 14 June 1996 Order Granting Summa ry Judgment. Bohler

claims also that the district court abused its disc retion in

denying his motion to withdraw deemed admissions. S ee F ED R. C IV

.

P. 36. (Bohler never responded to Express-Tech’s request for

admissions, which were properly deemed admitted. F E D

. R. C IV

. P.

36(a).) The court determined in its summary judgment ruling that

Bohler had failed to show either good cause to reopen discovery or

a lack of pre judice to Express-Tech. F E D

. R. C IV

. P. 36(b). We

find no abuse of discretion in this ruling.

AFFIRMED
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3048 

To amend the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 to prohibit an employer 

from recovering any health care premium paid by the employer for 

an employee if the employee fails to return to work due to the birth 

of a child, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2023 

Mr. VANCE (for himself and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 to 

prohibit an employer from recovering any health care 

premium paid by the employer for an employee if the 

employee fails to return to work due to the birth of 

a child, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness for Stay-at5 Home Parents Act’’. 

2 

•S 3048 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL 

2 LEAVE ACT OF 1993. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 104(c)(2)(B) of the Fam4 ily and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 

5 2614(c)(2)(B)) is amended— 

6 (1) in clause (i), by striking the ‘‘or’’ at the 

7 end; 

8 (2) by redesignating clause (ii) as clause (iii); 

9 and 

10 (3) by inserting after clause (i) the following: 

11 ‘‘(ii) the birth of a son or daughter of 

12 the employee; or’’. 

13 (b) NOTICE.—Section 104(c) of the Family and Med14 ical Leave Act of 1993 (29 U.S.C. 2614(c)) is amended 

15 by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(4) NOTICE REGARDING OPTION TO NOT RE17 TURN FROM LEAVE.—An employer shall notify any 

18 eligible employee that takes leave for the birth of a 

19 son or daughter of the employee that the employer 

20 may not recover any premium described in para21 graph (2) that the employer paid for maintaining 

22 coverage for the employee if the employee fails to re23 turn due to such birth.’’. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53791-53792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27450]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Special Emphasis Panel Meeting.

    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Name of Committee: NIDA Special Emphasis Panel (Molecular, 
Cellular and Chemical Neurobiology).
    Date: October 24, 1997.
    Time: 11:00 a.m.
    Place: Marriott Hotel of New Orleans, 555 Cannal Street, New 
Orleans, LA 70130.
    Contact Person: Gamil Debbas, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Extramural Program Review, National 
Institute on Drug Abuse, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 10-22, Telephone 
(301) 443-2620.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. The 
applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, disclosure of

[[Page 53792]]

which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers: 93.277, 
Drug Abuse Research Scientist Development and Research Scientist 
Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse Research Programs)

    Dated: October 10, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-27450 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Hooker Furniture Corporation (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Paul B. Toms, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: October 6, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Paul B. Toms, Jr.               
|                      |  |     |  | Paul B. Toms, Jr.                   
|                      |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
[Cite as State v. Mercado, 2020-Ohio-4185.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

 WARREN COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, 

 Appellee, 

 - vs - 

NYESHI MERCADO, 

 Appellant. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

CASE NO. CA2020-03-024 

D E C I S I O N 

 8/24/2020 

APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. 20CR36326 

David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, Kirsten A. Brandt, 520 Justice 

Drive, Lebanon, Ohio 45036, for appellee 

Kidd & Urling LLC, Thomas W. Kidd, Jr., 8913 Cincinnati-Dayton Road, West Chester, Ohio 

45069, for appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant, Nyeshi Mercado, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of 

proceedings and original papers from the Warren County Court of Common Pleas, and 

upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. 
Warren CA2020-03-024 

{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of 

the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; 

(2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744, 87 

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine 

whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for 

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both 

the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason 

that it is wholly frivolous. 

HENDRICKSON, P.J., RINGLAND and PIPER, JJ., concur.
Case 1:05-cv-00008-MBC-SPB   Document 9   Filed 03/28/06   Page 1 of 1
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

AUGUST 28, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-10266

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 98-02237-CV-T-23-TGW

BEVERLY DILLON, as trustee of L.I.G. Trust

and El Fuente Trust, NEIL A. STUBBS, as

trustee of Neal A. Stubbs, D.D.S. P.A. Profit 

Sharing Plan & Trust, CORPUS HAREM, LTD.,

Plaintiffs-Counter-DefendantsAppellees,

versus

AXXSYS INT’L INC., formerly known as 

Internet Access Co., Inc., et al.,

Defendants,

ADAM M. REISER, individually,

Defendant-Counter-Claimant, 

DEBORAH AUSTIN REISER, individually,

Defendant-Appellant.
2

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

 (August 28, 2007)

Before WILSON, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs

brought by Deborah Austin Reiser who was a defendant/appellee/cross-appellant

in this matter. We affirmed the judgments entered in the district court in Dillon v.

Axxsys International, Inc., 185 Fed. Appx. 823 (11 Cir. 2006). th

We now affirm the rulings of the district court denying these motions for the

reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge dated November 14, 2006 which was adopted by the United

States District Judge by Order dated December 19, 2006. 

AFFIRMED.
Status : 18 June 2010 

## REACH Consortium for Bentonite acid-leached

CLP Classification

According to the information available through the REACH IT portal, you are a member of the SIEFs for Bentonite acid-leached (EC number: 274-324-8, C AS number: 70131-50-9) and/or Montmorillonite acid-activated (EC number: 291-621-8, CAS number: 9 0431-92-8).

The REACH Consortium for Bentonite acid-leached wou ld like to inform you of the outcome of the

hazard assessment it has conducted on the substance Bentonite acid-leached. The classification has been made against the criteria of the Regulation (E C) 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures. The joint reg istration dossier will contain the classification information in the IUCLID section 2 and the support ing documents will be summarised in the other

relevant sections.

For Bentonite acid-leached, the warranted classific ation is “no classification” as the hazard

assessment so far demonstrates that it is a non-haz ardous substance. Although the Consortium still waits for some testing results, the warranted “not classified” status is not expected to change. Shoul d there be any modification in the classification, yo u will be immediately informed by email and on the

IMA REACH Hub.

Please note that SIEF members with REACH registrati on duties by 31 May 2013 and 31 May 2018 still have to notify the “not classified” status for thei r substance Bentonite acid-leached to the ECHA Classification & Labelling inventory by 3 January 2011 unless they submit thei r registration under REACH for calcium carbonate by 30 November 2010. Fo r the SIEF members who will join the joint registration and register Bentonite acid-leached by 30 November 2010, the notification of classificati on is indeed already covered in the joint registration dossier.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,909
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,566
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     61,482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,445
<PP&E>                                         234,497
<DEPRECIATION>                                 140,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 689,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,843
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       247,950
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   689,123
<SALES>                                         81,974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               500,501
<CGS>                                           53,471
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  458,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,343
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,784
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    563
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,996
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEETS AND INCOME STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                       OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               374
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     374
<PP&E>                                               22219
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1040
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       22260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                1631
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           5615
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         22260
<SALES>                                              2535
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     2539
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2222
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     396
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   239
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (318)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (318)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (318)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.27)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26939]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-62-007]


Wyoming Interstate Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 6, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 1, 1997, Wyoming Interstate Company 
LTD. (WIC), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 2, the tariff sheets listed in Appendix A to 
the filing, to be effective November 1, 1997.
    WIC states that the purpose of this compliance filing is to confirm 
WIC's tariff to requirements of the order issued June 13, 1997 in 
Docket No. RP97-62-003 and Order No. 387-C.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should filed a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26939 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3088 

To establish limitations regarding Confucius Institutes, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2023 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. HAWLEY, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. 

MARSHALL, Mr. GRASSLEY, and Mr. HAGERTY) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To establish limitations regarding Confucius Institutes, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Concerns Over Nations 

5 Funding University Campus Institutes in the United 

6 States Act’’ or the ‘‘CONFUCIUS Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS ON CONFUCIUS INSTITUTES. 

8 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘Confu9 cius Institute’’ means a cultural institute directly or indiVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:35 Oct 20, 2023 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3088.IS S3088

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3088 IS

1 rectly funded by the Government of the People’s Republic 

2 of China. 

3 (b) RESTRICTIONS ON CONFUCIUS INSTITUTES.—An 

4 institution of higher education or other postsecondary edu5 cational institution (referred to in this section as an ‘‘insti6 tution’’) shall not be eligible to receive Federal funds from 

7 the Department of Education (except funds under title IV 

8 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 

9 et seq.) or other Department of Education funds that are 

10 provided directly to students) unless the institution en11 sures that any contract or agreement between the institu12 tion and a Confucius Institute includes clear provisions 

13 that— 

14 (1) protect academic freedom at the institution; 

15 (2) prohibit the application of any foreign law 

16 on any campus of the institution; and 

17 (3) grant full managerial authority of the Con18 fucius Institute to the institution, including full con19 trol over what is being taught, the activities carried 

20 out, the research grants that are made, and who is 

21 employed at the Confucius Institute. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS