Page 1 of 69

MISSOURI
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 2 of 69

Table of Contents

Table of Contents.................................................................................................................................................... 2

Disclaimer............................................................................................................................................................... 3

Executive Summary................................................................................................................................................ 4

Introduction............................................................................................................................................................. 5

Program Structure ................................................................................................................................................... 5

Program Administration...................................................................................................................................... 5

Program Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 8

Project Implementation......................................................................................................................................... 17

Funds Programmed ........................................................................................................................................... 17

General Listing of Projects............................................................................................................................... 19

Safety Performance............................................................................................................................................... 36

General Highway Safety Trends....................................................................................................................... 36

Safety Performance Targets.............................................................................................................................. 49

Applicability of Special Rules.......................................................................................................................... 51

Evaluation ............................................................................................................................................................. 53

Program Effectiveness...................................................................................................................................... 53

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements ...................................................................... 54

Project Effectiveness......................................................................................................................................... 58

Compliance Assessment ....................................................................................................................................... 64
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 3 of 69

Disclaimer

Protection of Data from Discovery Admission into Evidence 

23 U.S.C. 148(h)(4) states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or 

data compiled or collected for any purpose relating to this section [HSIP], shall not be subject to discovery or 

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for 

damages arising from any occurrence at a location identified or addressed in the reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or other data.” 

23 U.S.C. 409 states “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data 

compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of 

potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings, pursuant to sections 

130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement 

project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or 

admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for 

damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, 

lists, or data.” 
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 4 of 69

Executive Summary

The Missouri Coalition for Roadway Safety and the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) are dedicated to 

improving safety of the motoring public through education, engineering, enforcement and emergency medical services 

initiatives. Safety is one of the Department’s core values: "Be Safe." This message is also reinforced in the 

Department’s Practical Design Guide that states, "Safety will not be compromised. Every project we do will make the 

facility safer after its completion." Additionally, "keeping our customers and ourselves safe" is a MoDOT Tangible 

Result.

Missouri's Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is driven by the state's Strategic Highway Safety Plan 

(SHSP). In October 2016, Missouri introduced its fourth edition of the SHSP and established a highway safety goal of 

700 or fewer fatalities by 2020. Missouri’s Blueprint: A Partnership to Zero Deaths guides the State’s safety 

initiatives and addresses safety from a comprehensive standpoint including engineering, enforcement, education, 

emergency medical services, technology and public policy solutions. The Blueprint focuses on implementing strategies 

that will reduce both fatal and serious injuries on Missouri roadways. The Blueprint and the statewide fatality goal are 

considered in the development and implementation of each of the Department’s highway safety plans.

Evidenced-based decision-making is paramount to a sound safety program. Data analysis is a critical part of 

identifying overrepresented crash types, locations, driver age, driver gender, and driver behaviors. These findings 

guide the deployment of effective and appropriate strategies to improve safety on the entire system. Efforts are made 

to analyze fatal and serious injury crashes to help discern where limited safety funding should be applied so that 

maximum safety improvements and benefits are attained.

From 2005-2014, Missouri experienced a steady decline in both fatalities and serious injuries. During that time, 

fatalities decreased by 40 percent (1,257 in 2005 to 766 in 2014) and serious injuries decreased by 46 percent (8,621 

in 2005 to 4,567 in 2014). Over the last two years, the fatalities and serious injuries have been rising. In 2016, 

preliminary data indicates 949 fatalities and 4,719 serious injuries in Missouri. This results in a 24% increase in 

fatalities and 3% increase in serious injuries compared to 2014. The 2016 fatality rate in Missouri was 1.27. The 5-

year average for fatalities increased in 2016 to 834, while the 5-year average for serious injuries decreased (4,860) 

for the 11th year in a row.
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 5 of 69

Introduction

The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a core Federal-aid program with the purpose of achieving 

a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. As per 23 U.S.C. 148(h) and 23 CFR 

924.15, States are required to report annually on the progress being made to advance HSIP implementation and 

evaluation efforts. The format of this report is consistent with the HSIP Reporting Guidance dated December 

29, 2016 and consists of five sections: program structure, progress in implementing highway safety 

improvement projects, progress in achieving safety outcomes and performance targets, effectiveness of the 

improvements and compliance assessment.

Program Structure

Program Administration

Describe the general structure of the HSIP in the State. 

The overall HSIP is administered by MoDOT's Highway Safety and Traffic Division. However, the division does not 

typically identify individual projects as part of this process. Instead, HSIP funds are distributed to each of MoDOT's 

seven districts based on the number of crashes and other factors within each region. From there, each district 

identifies how their share of HSIP funds will be programmed in accordance with Missouri's SHSP and MoDOT guidance. 

The districts carry out the projects to completion, and all HSIP projects are reported by the Highway Safety and Traffic 

Division. Occasionally, statewide safety projects may be carried out by the Highway Safety and Traffic Division. 

Missouri's HSIP is primarily developed by MoDOT. However, since the state's SHSP involves input from external 

stakeholders throughout the state, the HSIP is influenced by external partners as well.

Where is HSIP staff located within the State DOT? 

 Operations

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The Highway Safety and Traffic Division lead the HSIP reporting effort. The District Traffic Offices help in 

the selection of HSIP projects and implementation of the HSIP program.

How are HSIP funds allocated in a State? 

Formula via Districts/Regions

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

The Highway Safety and Traffic Division also have some HSIP funds distributed to them.

Describe how local and tribal roads are addressed as part of HSIP.

Our local roads are included in the crash data system analysis. We evaluate all roadways in the state and place 

emphasis on severe crashes. This analysis is performed for both intersections and non-intersection locations. To 

date we have used an analysis method, which places weight on the severe crashes and locations that have 

experienced a higher frequency of severe crashes and are often those that will find their way on our top priority 
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 6 of 69

lists. While most of the locations to date have been on the state system roadways, we have recently seen a few 

of the local roads locations make these high priority lists. While we continue to believe that the majority of the 

problem locations will be state system locations, we have evaluated non-state system severe crash locations and 

have determined that 55% of our non-state system fatalities are in seven counties. Local strategic highway 

safety plans (SHSP) have been developed for these seven counties (Jackson, Jefferson, St. Louis City, Greene, 

St. Louis, Franklin, and St. Charles). The local SHSPs identify systemic countermeasures and high priority 

projects. To date we have communicated the problem locations to the planning entities like our Metropolitan 

Planning Organizations and Regional Planning Commissions. We also work with our LTAP center to continue 

to move safety forward in our state. Additionally, we have used the RSA process to better address local road 

issues on occasion, we have a Transportation Engineering Assistance Program (TEAP) to assist locals, and we 

also have a subcommittee from our SHSP that focuses on infrastructure improvement opportunities for local 

roads.

Identify which internal partners (e.g., State departments of transportation (DOTs) Bureaus, Divisions) 

are involved with HSIP planning.

Traffic Engineering/Safety

Design

Planning

Maintenance

Operations

Districts/Regions

Governors Highway Safety Office

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

There is some overlap in these selections with the way MoDOT is structured. Traffic engineering/safety could 

be included under operations, however operations is more inclusive in other traffic areas that both were 

selected.

Describe coordination with internal partners.

MoDOT has focused for some time on system-wide safety solutions. We have worked with our Design Division 

to address our Engineering Policy, our Operations and Maintenance staff to improve the roadsides, and our 

Planning staff to better evaluate and select safety needs for improvements. We have also worked with the 

previously mentioned internal partners on the training and use of the Highway Safety Manual (HSM). 

Additionally, we work daily with the Highway Safety office to evaluate and monitor the crash types. It is vital 

that all areas in our department work together and focus on safety improvements. We have begun efforts to 

improve our safety situation on the local roads and have developed local SHSPs for our top counties. We are 

also working with our Planning and Design Divisions to consider how we might best administer safety projects 

on local roads.

Identify which external partners are involved with HSIP planning.

Regional Planning Organizations (e.g. MPOs, RPOs, COGs)

Governors Highway Safety Office

Local Government Agency 
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 7 of 69

Law Enforcement Agency

Academia/University

FHWA

Other-National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Other-Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

Other-Emergency Services, Department of Revenue, etc

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Describe coordination with external partners.

Missouri's Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is the umbrella document that identifies emphasis areas and 

prioritizes strategies for reducing fatalities and serious injuries on all Missouri roadways. The development of 

the SHSP utilized significant involvement from external stakeholders throughout the state, including 

metropolitan planning organizations and local government agencies.

MoDOT has also identified the top counties where non-state system fatalities have occurred and worked with 

them to develop localized strategic safety plans. These plans identify systemic countermeasures and high 

priority projects. 

Additionally, when setting the new safety performance targets, MoDOT had an inclusive process 

which thoroughly involved collaboration with our MPOs and other planning partners to come to a consensus on 

the 2018 targets.

Have any program administration practices used to implement the HSIP changed since the last reporting 

period?

Yes

Describe HSIP program administration practices that have changed since the last reporting period.

The total distribution of HSIP funds to the districts increased by $7 million in state fiscal year 2017, which 

started July 1st, 2016. Another $3 million in HSIP was administered by Central Office during state fiscal year

2017. This was included in last year's report, as well as, this year's report, since the fiscal year that this change 

took place overlaps HSIP reporting periods.

Are there any other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to elaborate?

Yes

Describe other aspects of HSIP Administration on which the State would like to elaborate. 
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 8 of 69

Safety initiatives continue to be driven by the State SHSP. The State SHSP includes numerous safety initiatives 

that are data driven. Each district develops a regional district safety plan for their available HSIP funds. These 

district plans must support the overarching goals of the statewide SHSP at the district level.

Program Methodology

Does the State have an HSIP manual or similar that clearly describes HSIP planning, implementation 

and evaluation processes?

No

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

MoDOT has an EPG article that outlines the safety program guidelines.

http://epg.modot.org/index.php?title=907.1_Safety_Program_Guidelines

Select the programs that are administered under the HSIP.

Median Barrier

Intersection

Horizontal Curve

Skid Hazard

Roadway Departure

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

While no HSIP funds have been spent on Local Roadways, our District staff coordinates with our local agency 

partners to prioritize projects and assist with the development of localized safety plans.

Program: Horizontal Curve 

Date of Program Methodology: 2/8/2013 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 9 of 69

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Volume Horizontal curvature 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Crash frequency

Relative severity index

Excess proportions of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Other-Systemic evaluation

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Other-Systemic safety initiative : 1

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Program: Intersection 

Date of Program Methodology: 1/21/2009 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 10 of 69

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Volume Functional classification 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Crash frequency

Relative severity index

Excess proportions of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Other-Systemic evaluation

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Other-Systemic safety initiative : 1

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Program: Median Barrier 

Date of Program Methodology: 9/27/2002 
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 11 of 69

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Volume 

Horizontal curvature 

Functional classification 

Roadside features 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Crash frequency

Relative severity index

Excess proportions of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Other-Systemic evaluation

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Other-Systemic safety initiative : 1
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 12 of 69

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Program: Roadway Departure 

Date of Program Methodology: 10/1/2004 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only Volume Functional classification 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Crash frequency

Relative severity index

Excess proportions of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?

Other-Systemic evaluation

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 13 of 69

Rank of Priority Consideration

Other-Systemic safety initiative : 1

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Program: Skid Hazard 

Date of Program Methodology: 2/8/2013 

What is the justification for this program? [Check all that apply]

Addresses SHSP priority or emphasis area

What is the funding approach for this program? [Check one]

Competes with all projects

What data types were used in the program methodology? [Check all that apply]

Crashes Exposure Roadway 

All crashes 

Fatal and serious injury crashes only 

Other-Wet pavement crashes 

Horizontal curvature 

What project identification methodology was used for this program? [Check all that apply]

Crash frequency

Relative severity index

Excess proportions of specific crash types

Are local roads (non-state owned and operated) included or addressed in this program?

Yes

Are local road projects identified using the same methodology as state roads?

Yes

Describe the methodology used to identify local road projects as part of this program.

How are projects under this program advanced for implementation?
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 14 of 69

Other-Systemic evaluation

Select the processes used to prioritize projects for implementation. For the methods selected, indicate the 

relative importance of each process in project prioritization. Enter either the weights or numerical 

rankings. If weights are entered, the sum must equal 100. If ranks are entered, indicate ties by giving 

both processes the same rank and skip the next highest rank (as an example: 1, 2, 2, 4).

Rank of Priority Consideration

Other-Systemic safety initiative : 1

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

What percentage of HSIP funds address systemic improvements?

 80

 HSIP funds are used to address which of the following systemic improvements? Please check all that 

apply.

Cable Median Barriers

Rumble Strips

Pavement/Shoulder Widening

Install/Improve Signing

Install/Improve Pavement Marking and/or Delineation

Upgrade Guard Rails

Safety Edge

Horizontal curve signs

High friction surface treatment

Other-Intersection improvments, wrong-way driving countermeasures, high friction surface treatments, and 

local safety initiatives. Other initiatives implemented due to policy change.

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

What process is used to identify potential countermeasures? [Check all that apply]

Engineering Study

Road Safety Assessment

Crash data analysis

SHSP/Local road safety plan

Data-driven safety analysis tools (HSM, CMF Clearinghouse, SafetyAnalyst, usRAP)

Stakeholder input

Other-Enforcement and other stakeholders input.

Other-Peer Exchange - lessons learned
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 15 of 69

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

All of the countermeasure identification processes listed here are applicable to MoDOT's countermeasure 

selection, although they vary depending on how the safety need was identified (Systemic, Spot, RSA).

Does the State HSIP consider connected vehicles and ITS technologies? 

Yes

Describe how the State HSIP considers connected vehicles and ITS technologies. 

In Emphisis Area 1, Serious Crash Types, there are six focus areas.

Lane Departure

• Run-Off-Road - Not in a Curve

• Run-Off-Road - In a Curve

• Collision with Tree and/or Utility Pole

• Head-On

Intersections

• Non-signalized

• Signalized

Each of these focus areas have key strategies identified, including supporting vehicle-toinfrastructure communications. One such example would be to provide an in-vehicle warning to the driver 

when approaching a red light at a traffic signal.

MoDOT is also currently investigating autonomous Truck Mounted Attenuators for mobile work zones.

Does the State use the Highway Safety Manual to support HSIP efforts?

Yes

Please describe how the State uses the HSM to support HSIP efforts.

The HSM is utilized when performing alternative analysis of safety countermeasures for a particular 

project. This often involves using crash modification factors from the CMF clearing house.

The HSM is also used to develop a safety benefit for a project, which is used to both justify using safety dollars 

and prioritize the project.
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 16 of 69

Have any program methodology practices used to implement the HSIP changed since the last reporting 

period?

Yes

Describe program methodology practices that have changed since the last reporting period.

New tools have been developed to perform network screening for each MoDOT District to assist with their 

prioritization of safety projects. These screening tools evaluate particular safety issues, which include:

• Horizontal Curve Analysis

• Shoulder Analysis

• Expressway Intersection Analysis

• Wet Crash Analysis

• Crossed Centerline Analysis

• High Severity Analysis

• Unrestrained Analysis

• Impaired Analysis

Are there any other aspects of the HSIP methodology on which the State would like to elaborate?

Yes

Describe other aspects of the HSIP methodology on which the State would like to elaborate.

MoDOT uses a systemic approach to safety project implementation. The top crash types have been 

determined and focus strategies have been identified for implementation for each district. The 

strategies are listed in MoDOT's Engineering Policy Guide at 

http://epg.modot.org/index.php?title=907.1_Safety_Program_Guidelines. 
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 17 of 69

Project Implementation

Funds Programmed

Reporting period for HSIP funding.

State Fiscal Year

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Enter the programmed and obligated funding for each applicable funding category.

FUNDING CATEGORY PROGRAMMED OBLIGATED % OBLIGATED/PROGRAMMED

HSIP (23 U.S.C. 148) $46,332,000 $97,638,530 210.74%

HRRR Special Rule (23 U.S.C. 

148(g)(1))

$0 $281 0%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 154) $18,109,000 $17,830,249 98.46%

Penalty Funds (23 U.S.C. 164) $0 $0 0%

RHCP (for HSIP purposes) (23 

U.S.C. 130(e)(2))

$0 $0 0%

Other Federal-aid Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

$0 $791,729 0%

State and Local Funds $4,633,200 $9,922,199 214.15%

Totals $69,074,200 $126,182,988 182.68%

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

A 10% match for HSIP funds was assumed for State and Local Funds. A 20% match for Other Federal funds 

was assumed for State and Local Funds.

The programmed dollar amounts are for projects identified in the SFY 2017 STIP. The obligated amounts 

include all safety dollars spent in SFY 2017, which could include projects that were programmed in prior fiscal 

years or for operations, which is not included in the STIP.

How much funding is programmed to local (non-state owned and operated) or tribal safety projects?

0%

How much funding is obligated to local or tribal safety projects?

0%
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 18 of 69

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

How much funding is programmed to non-infrastructure safety projects?

0%

How much funding is obligated to non-infrastructure safety projects?

0%

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

How much funding was transferred in to the HSIP from other core program areas during the reporting 

period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

0%

How much funding was transferred out of the HSIP to other core program areas during the reporting 

period under 23 U.S.C. 126?

0%

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Discuss impediments to obligating HSIP funds and plans to overcome this challenge in the future.

Due to limited state funding over the past few years, MoDOT's construction budget has been constrained and 

restricted the number of systemic safety improvements that could be implemented. This created an issue with fully 

programming safety projects and resulted in a growth of unobligated HSIP funding.

Beginning in state fiscal year 2017, (started July 1, 2016) MoDOT's overall construction program has increased to 

near normal levels. MoDOT's leadership also increased the amount of safety funds available for programming by $10 

million for FY2017. Additionally, there has been a concerted effort to prioritize and over-program safety projects to 

bring the unobligated balance down. Together, these changes will enhance MoDOT's ability to fully obligate and 

program HSIP funds.

Does the State want to elaborate on any other aspects of it’s progress in implementing HSIP projects?

No
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 19 of 69

General Listing of Projects

List the projects obligated using HSIP funds for the reporting period.

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

Northwest -

Atchison - US 136 

(1P2224) 

Pavement and 

shoulder 

improvements 

from the Tarkio 

River bridge, near 

Tarkio, to the 

Little Tarkio 

Creek bridge 0.3 

mile east of Rte. 

M.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

5.958 Miles $450000 $1622000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

600 60 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add & improve 

shoulders

Northwest -

Buchanan - US 

36 (1P3179) High 

friction surface 

treatment on Rte. 

36 westbound 

lanes between I229 and 10th 

Street in St. 

Joseph, and 1.5 

miles east of Rte. 

31 near 

Stewartsville in 

DeKalb County. 

$175,000 from 

Statewide Safety 

Funds.

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

0.51 Miles $180000 $180000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

11,000 65 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane Departure Improve 

pavement friction

Northwest -

Chariton - US 24 

(1P3005) 

Pavement and 

shoulder 

improvements 

from Rte. 5 in 

Keytesville to 

Randolph County 

line. $2,600,000 

from SAFETEALU Demo ID # 

MO145.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

13.16 Miles $1000000 $4049000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

1,700 60 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add & improve 

shoulders

Northwest -

Daviess - US 69 

(1S3028) 

Pavement and 

shoulder 

improvements 

from I-35 to 

Pence Road, 0.4 

mile north of Rte. 

36 in Cameron. 

$690,000 Open 

Container Funds.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

7.292 Miles $690000 $1837000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

2,600 60 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add & improve 

shoulders
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 20 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

Northwest -

Various - Various 

(1P3022) Job 

Order Contracting 

for guard cable 

and guardrail 

repair at various 

major route 

locations in the 

Northwest 

District.

Roadway Roadway - other 1 Numbers $353000 $353000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Improve guard 

cable & guardrail

Northwest -

Various - Various 

(1P3154) On-call 

work zone law 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in the Northwest 

District.

Roadway Roadway - other 1 Numbers $50000 $50000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Work Zones Increase 

enforcement 

efforts

Northeast -

Lincoln - RT H 

(2S3109) Replace 

bridge over 

Cuivre River 4.3 

miles north of 

Rte. 47 near Troy. 

Project involves 

bridge P0111. 

$250,000 Open 

Container funds.

Roadway Roadway - other 0.624 Miles $250000 $1940000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

942 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

other

Northeast -

Marion - US 61 

(2P3164) 

Pavement 

treatment for 

safety 

improvements on 

horizontal curves 

at Rtes. 24 and 

61 interchange at 

Taylor.

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

0.49 Miles $210000 $210000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

8,174 65 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Improve 

pavement friction

Northeast -

Montgomery - MO 

161 (2S3072) 

Replace bridge 

over Cuivre River 

0.2 mile south of 

Rte. T near 

Middletown. 

$85,000 Open 

Container funds. 

Project involves 

bridge S0806.

Roadway Roadway - other 0.105 Miles $85000 $968000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Rural Minor 

Collector

296 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

other

Northeast - Pike -

US 61 (2P3116) 

Pavement 

improvements on 

southbound lanes 

from 0.6 mile 

south of Rte. 161 

Roadway Pavement surface -

miscellaneous

18.801 Miles $160000 $4786000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

6,548 65 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

other
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 21 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

to Rte. E near 

Auburn in Lincoln 

County. $160,000 

Open Container 

funds.

Northeast - Ralls -

US 61 (3P2206) 

Pavement and 

intersection 

improvements 

from Warren 

Barrett Drive in 

Hannibal to 0.5 

mile south of Rte. 

19 near New 

London. $565,000 

Open Container 

funds. $3,085,291 

from SAFETEALU Demo ID # 

MO145.

Roadway Pavement surface -

miscellaneous

7.89 Miles $565000 $5088000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

19,132 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Improve 

intersection safety

Northeast -

Randolph - US 24 

(2P3051) 

Pavement and 

shoulder 

improvements 

from the Chariton 

County line to 1.5 

miles west of Rte. 

C near Huntsville. 

$225,000 Open 

Container funds.

Roadway Pavement surface -

miscellaneous

7.636 Miles $225000 $1799000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

1,870 60 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add & improve 

shoulders

Northeast -

Various - Various 

(2P3093) Job 

Order Contracting 

for guardrail 

repair at various 

locations in the 

Northeast District.

Roadway Roadway - other 1 Numbers $137000 $137000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Improve guard 

cable & guardrail

Northeast -

Various - Various 

(2P3145) On-call 

work zone 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in the Northeast 

District.

Roadway Roadway - other 1 Numbers $10000 $10000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Work Zones Increase 

enforcement 

efforts

Kansas City -

Jackson - US 24 

(4P3081) 

Pavement and 

ADA Transition 

Plan 

improvements 

from Rte. 291 to 

Rte. 7 in 

Independence. 

$171,000 

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians and 

bicyclists

5.923 Miles $650000 $3046000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Pedestrians Engineering; 

Upgrade ADA 

facilities
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 22 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

Statewide 

Transportation 

Alternatives 

funds.

Kansas City -

Johnson - MO 

131 (3P3077) 

Safety and 

intersection 

improvements at 

Rte. 131. 

$1,200,000 

District Operating 

Budget.

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other 1.304 Miles $848000 $2048000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

18,100 65 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Engineering; 

Install J-turn

Kansas City -

Lafayette - IS 70 

(3I3042) 

Pavement 

improvements 

from east of the 

Jackson County 

line to east of 

Johnson Drive 

near Odessa. 

$321,000 Open 

Container funds. 

$49,000 

Accelerated 

Innovation and 

Deployment (AID) 

Demonstration 

funds.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

9.391 Miles $321000 $4996000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Interstate

35,000 70 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure Engineering; 

Rumblestripes

Kansas City -

Lafayette - RT Z 

(3P3085B) To 

improve safety at 

Rte. TT 

intersection. 

$396,000 District 

Operating 

Budget.

Alignment Vertical alignment or elevation 

change

0.202 Miles $16000 $412000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Rural Major 

Collector

1,400 55 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections Engineering; Cut 

hill to increase 

sight distance

Kansas City -

Lafayette - US 24 

(3P3057) 

Intersection 

improvements at 

Rte. 131 south of 

Wellington. 

$453,000 Open 

Container funds 

and $283,000 

District Operating 

Budget.

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry - other 0.4 Miles $523000 $806000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

2,900 65 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Engineering; 

Install 

Roundabout

Kansas City -

Pettis - US 50 

(3P3056) Signal 

improvements 

from Winchester 

Road to Engineer 

Avenue in 

Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

Advanced technology and ITS -

other

1 Numbers $100000 $106000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

15,400 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Data Technology; 

Connect our 

signals to ATMS
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 23 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

Sedalia. $100,000 

Open Container 

funds.

Kansas City -

Platte - IS 29 

(4I3105) 

Pavement 

improvements 

from Todd Creek 

to US 69 (Vivion 

Rd.). $1,525,000 

Open Container 

funds. $1,332,886 

from TEA-21 

Demo ID # 

MO019. 

$4,005,900 from 

SAFETEA-LU 

Demo ID # 

MO156. $500,000 

from SAFETEALU Demo ID

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

12.273 Miles $1525000 $12297000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Interstate

0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure Engineering; 

Rumblestripes

Kansas City -

Platte - MO 152 

(4S3207) Install 

median guard 

cable from I-435 

to Congress Ave. 

$1,092,000 

District 

Operations 

Budget.

Roadside Barrier - cable 4.81 Miles $98000 $1190000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

8,000 65 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Engineering; 

Install High 

Tension Guard 

Cable

Kansas City -

Platte - MO 9 

(4S3208) Install 

median guard 

cable from I-635 

to Rte. 169. 

$449,000 District 

Operations 

Budget.

Roadside Barrier - cable 1.332 Miles $40000 $489000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

10,702 55 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Engineering; 

Install High 

Tension Guard 

Cable

Kansas City -

Platte - MO 92 

(4P3139) 

Pavement 

improvements 

from Rte. 371 in 

Platte City to Rte. 

DD. Includes Rte. 

273 from Rte. 371 

to Spur 92, Spur 

92 from Rte. 273 

to Rte. 92, and 

Rte. 92 from Spur 

92 to Rt $282,000 

Open Container 

funds.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

15.242 Miles $282000 $3623000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

5,200 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure Engineering; 

Rumblestripes

Kansas City -

Various - Various 

(3I3023) On-call 

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Roadway signs and traffic 

control - other

1 Numbers $11000 $11000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Work Zones Enforcement; 

Increased 

Presence in WZ
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 24 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

work zone 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in the rural 

Kansas City 

District.

Kansas City -

Various - Various 

(3S3079) 

Chevron sign 

installations at 

various locations 

in the rural 

Kansas City 

District. $46,000 

District Operating 

Budget.

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

1 Numbers $163000 $209000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Engineering; 

Install chevrons 

on curves

Kansas City -

Various - Various 

(4I3044) On-call 

work zone 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in the urban 

Kansas City 

District.

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Roadway signs and traffic 

control - other

1 Numbers $162000 $162000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Work Zones Enforcement; 

Increased 

Presence in WZ

Kansas City -

Various - Various 

(4P3142) Signal 

improvements at 

various locations 

in Clay, Platte 

and Jackson 

counties in the 

urban Kansas 

City District. 

$450,000 Open 

Container Funds, 

$50,000 District 

Operations 

Budget.

Advanced 

technology and 

ITS

Advanced technology and ITS -

other

1 Numbers $450000 $510000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Data Technology; 

Connect our 

signals to ATMS

Kansas City -

Various - Various 

(4P3231) Safety 

improvements at 

various locations 

in the urban 

Kansas City 

District.

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

1 Numbers $278000 $278000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Engineering; 

Increase 

pavement friction

Central - Boone -

MO 124 (5P3225) 

Pavement and 

shoulder 

improvements 

from Hallsville to 

Centralia. 

Includes 

pavement and 

shoulder 

improvements on 

Shoulder 

treatments

Pave existing shoulders 14.797 Miles $946000 $3213000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

5,954 60 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Engineering; 

Improve 

Shoulders
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 25 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

Rte. B from 

Hallsville to 

Brown Station 

Road at 

Columbia.

Central -

Callaway - US 54 

(5P3119) Bridge 

improvements 

from 2.2 miles 

south of Rte. BB 

to I-70 near 

Fulton. Project 

includes safety 

improvements 

from 0.1 mile 

west of Rte. W to 

I-70 at Kingdom 

City. Involves 

bridges L0964, 

H0284, A2109, 

A2110, A2111

Roadside Barrier - cable 28.863 Miles $3607000 $10278000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

0 70 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Engineering; 

median barrier 

cable

Central - Camden 

- RT F (5S3148) 

Pavement and 

shoulder 

improvements 

from Rte. 5 to end 

of state 

maintenance. 

Includes 

pavement and 

shoulder 

improvements on 

Rte. TT to end of 

state 

maintenance and 

on Rte. MM from 

Rte. T

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - paved or 

other

14.035 Miles $475000 $2686000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

1,652 45 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Engineering; 

widen shoulders

Central - Camden 

- US 54 (5P3221) 

Safety 

improvements 1.2 

miles west of Rte. 

Y. Includes safety 

improvements on 

Rte. 5 from 0.2 

mile south of Rte. 

7 north Jct. to 0.7 

mile south of Rte. 

7 north Jct. in 

Camden Co. and 

Rte. W from 0.1 

mile north of Wel

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

0.985 Miles $271000 $271000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane Departure Engineering; High 

Friction Surface 

Treatment

Central - Cole -

RT B (5S3149) 

Pavement and 

shoulder 

improvements 

from Lorenzo 

Green Drive in 

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - paved or 

other

19.634 Miles $1255000 $5109000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Major 

Collector

7,390 55 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Engineering; 

Improve 

Shoulders
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 26 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

Jefferson City to 

Rte. 133 in Meta. 

$17,187 from City 

of Meta.

Central - Cole -

US 50 (5P3056) 

Intersection 

improvements at 

Liberty Road in 

Jefferson City. 

Includes 

intersection 

improvements at 

Lisletown Road 

0.7 mile east of 

Rte. J at Taos.

Access 

management

Change in access - close or 

restrict existing access

0.761 Miles $19000 $457000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

17,497 65 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Engineering; 

intersection 

improvements: 

median 

improvements 

(restrict access), 

acceleration 

lanes, 

deceleration lanes

Central - Cooper -

MO 5 (5P3170) 

Pavement and 

shoulder 

improvements 

from I-70 to Rte. 

50. $2,312,000 

from Open 

Container funds.

Shoulder 

treatments

Pave existing shoulders 19.754 Miles $2312000 $4784000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

1,392 55 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Engineering; 

Improve 

Shoulders

Central - Morgan 

- MO 52 (5P3117) 

Pavement and 

shoulder 

improvements 

from Rte. 5 west 

junction at 

Versailles to 

Aurora Street at 

Eldon. $49,000 

Accelerated 

Innovation 

Deployment (AID) 

Demonstration 

funds.

Shoulder 

treatments

Pave existing shoulders 17.93 Miles $877000 $3632000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Engineering; 

Improve 

Shoulders

Central - Various 

- Various 

(5P3180) On-call 

work zone 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in the Central 

District.

Speed 

management

Traffic calming feature 1 Numbers $0 $35000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Work Zones Enforcement

Central - Various 

- Various 

(5P3204) 

Chevron 

installation on 

various curves in 

Boone and 

Callaway 

Counties.

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

1 Numbers $12000 $326000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure Engineering; 

Improve roadway 

visibility
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 27 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

St. Louis -

Franklin - RT BB 

(6S3137) 

Pavement and 

shoulder 

improvements 

from Rte. A to 

Rte. 50.

Roadway Roadway - other 3.074 Miles $262000 $1391000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Major 

Collector

1,586 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Add shoulders 

and improve 

pavement

St. Louis -

Jefferson - CRD 

OLD HWY 21 

(6S3174) Install 

new signal at 

Konert Road.

Intersection traffic 

control

Systemic improvements -

signal-controlled

0.02 Miles $184000 $184000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Collector

5,397 40 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Improve 

intersection safety

St. Louis -

Jefferson - MO 

141 (6P3143) 

Intersection 

improvements at 

Ridgewood 

School Road.

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometrics -

miscellaneous/other/unspecified

0.087 Miles $946000 $955000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

16,955 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Improve 

intersection safety

St. Louis - St. 

Charles - MO 364 

(6P3135) Safety 

improvements 

from I-64 to Mid 

Rivers Mall Drive.

Roadside Barrier - other 8.61 Miles $1178000 $1178000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

14,938 60 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Install median 

barrier and 

guardrail

St. Louis - St. 

Louis - MO 141 

(6P3164) Install 

guard cable from 

Casino Center 

Drive to River 

Valley Drive.

Roadside Barrier - cable 2.478 Miles $494000 $494000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

8,220 45 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Install median 

barrier

St. Louis - St. 

Louis - RP 

IS270W TO 

MO364E 

(6S3199) High 

friction surface 

treatments on 

seven locations in 

counties of 

Franklin, St. 

Charles, St. 

Louis, and St 

Louis City.

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

1.704 Miles $567000 $567000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Improve curve 

safety

St. Louis -

Various - Various 

(6P3194) Safety 

improvements on 

various routes in 

the St. Louis 

District. 

$5,032,000 Open 

Container funds. 

Design Build 

project.

Roadway Roadway - other 1 Numbers $22608000 $22608000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Various Various
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 28 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

St. Louis -

Various - Various 

(6P3319) On-call 

work zone 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in the St. Louis 

District.

Non-infrastructure Enforcement 1 Numbers $270000 $270000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Work Zones Improve work 

zone safety

Southwest - Barry 

- MO 76 

(7S2227B) 

Pavement and 

safety 

improvements 

from County 

Road 2182 to 

north of Fourth 

Street in Cassville 

and from Rte. 112 

to Flat Creek 

Road.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

21.299 Miles $730000 $2583000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Major 

Collector

1,434 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add 2' Shoulders 

and Edgeline 

Rumbles

Southwest - Barry 

- RT W (7S3185) 

Pavement and 

safety 

improvements 

from Rte. 86 to 

Rte. 37.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

8.815 Miles $465000 $1148000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Major 

Collector

2,500 55 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add 2' Shoulders 

and Edgeline 

Rumbles

Southwest -

Cedar - MO 32 

(7P3097) Safety 

improvements at 

Rte. CC.

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

0.129 Miles $58000 $58000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

1,449 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane Departure High Friction 

Surface 

Treatment

Southwest -

Christian - MO 14 

(7P3089) 

Pavement and 

safety 

improvements 

from Rte. OO to 

Rte. 125 south 

junction.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

2.719 Miles $172000 $527000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

8,655 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add 2' Shoulders 

and Centerline 

and Edgeline 

Rumbles

Southwest -

Christian - MO 14 

(8P3057) 

Pavement and 

safety 

improvements 

from Rte. W to 

Rte. OO.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

2.885 Miles $208000 $575000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

11,552 55 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add 2' Shoulders 

and Centerline 

and Edgeline 

Rumbles

Southwest -

Dallas - MO 32 

(7P3091) 

Pavement and 

safety 

improvements 

from Rte. 65 to 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

2.847 Miles $19000 $477000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

5,650 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add 2' Shoulders 

and Edgeline 

Rumbles. 

Upgrade guardrail 

to MGS
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 29 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

0.6 mile west of 

Rte. H.

Southwest -

Greene - IS 44 

(8I3055) Safety 

improvements on 

freeway ramps 

from Rte. 160 

(West Bypass) to 

Rte. H/Loop 44 

(Glenstone 

Avenue).

Roadway Roadway - other 5.692 Miles $1845000 $1845000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Interstate

30,750 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Extending 

Acceleration and 

Deceleration 

Lanes at 

Interchanges to 

meet AASHTO

Southwest -

Greene - LP 44 

(8S3062) Safety 

improvements on 

the westbound 

lanes east of 

College Road in 

Springfield.

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

0.14 Miles $57000 $57000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and

Expressways

9,404 40 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane Departure High Friction 

Surface 

Treatment

Southwest -

Greene - MO 13 

(8P3007D) 

Pedestrian 

crossing safety 

improvements at 

Rte. 13 (Kansas 

Expressway) and 

Grand Street and 

at Rte. 160 (West 

Bypass) and Loop 

44 (Chestnut 

Expressway). 

$128,000 

Statewide 

Transportation 

Alternatives 

funds.

Roadway Roadway - other 0.315 Miles $179000 $389000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

28,000 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Pedestrians Adding Pedestian 

Accomodations 

(Cut Thrus, 

Countdown Peds, 

Crosswalk 

Markings)

Southwest -

Greene - MO 13 

(8S3063) Safety 

improvements on 

the southbound 

lanes north of 

Division Street in 

Springfield.

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

0.151 Miles $51000 $51000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

15,002 40 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane Departure High Friction 

Surface 

Treatment

Southwest -

Greene - MO 360 

(8P3102) 

Pavement and 

operational 

improvements on 

ramps at various 

locations on Rte. 

60 (James River 

Freeway) from 

0.2 mile west of 

Rte. MM to Rte. 

65.

Roadway Roadway - other 12.477 Miles $500000 $3935000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

26,756 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Extending 

Acceleration and 

Deceleration 

Lanes at 

Interchanges to 

meet AASHTO. 

Upgrade 

guardrail.
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 30 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

Southwest -

Greene - RT AB 

(8S3059) 

Pavement and 

safety 

improvements 

from Rte. 160 to 

Rte. 266.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

6.095 Miles $227000 $856000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

3,680 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add 2' Shoulders 

and Edgeline 

Rumbles

Southwest -

Greene - RT EE 

(8S3058) 

Pavement and 

safety 

improvements 

from Rte. AB to 

Rte. 160.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

5.077 Miles $251000 $799000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

3,190 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add 2' Shoulders 

and Edgeline 

Rumbles

Southwest -

Greene - US 60 

(8P3056) Safety 

improvements at 

various 

intersections on 

Rtes. 413/60 from 

Rte. 174 in 

Republic to 0.5 

mile west of Rte. 

160 (West 

Bypass) in 

Springfield. 

$815,000 Open 

Container Funds.

Roadway Roadway - other 6.968 Miles $3192000 $3205000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

29,314 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Intersections Construct full 

length left turn 

decel lanes, offset 

left turns, and 

offset right turns.

Southwest -

Greene - US 60 

(8P3094) 

Guardrail 

improvements on 

James River 

Freeway from 0.3 

mile south of I-44 

to Rte. 65.

Roadway Roadway - other 13.411 Miles $1539000 $1539000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Upgrade 

Guardrail to 

current standards.

Southwest -

Greene - US 65 

(8P3079) 

Guardrail 

improvements 

from Rte. 744 

(Kearney Street) 

to 0.3 mile north 

of Rte. D 

(Sunshine Street).

Roadway Roadway - other 3.711 Miles $431000 $431000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

0 60 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Upgrade 

Guardrail to 

current standards.

Southwest -

Henry - MO 52 

(7P3114) 

Pavement and 

safety 

improvements 

from Rte. 7 in 

Clinton to Rte. B 

east of Windsor.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

18.536 Miles $1130000 $3374000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

3,140 55 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add 2' Shoulders 

and Edgeline 

Rumbles. 

Upgrade guardrail 

to MGS
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 31 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

Southwest -

Jasper - MO 37 

(7P3093) 

Pavement and 

safety 

improvements 

from Rte. 96 to 

south of Joplin 

Avenue in 

Sarcoxie. 

$421,000 Open 

Container Funds.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

11.845 Miles $492000 $1650000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

2,606 55 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add 2' Shoulders 

and Edgeline 

Rumbles. 

Upgrade guardrail 

to MGS

Southwest -

Jasper - MO 96 

(7S3095) 

Pavement and 

safety 

improvements 

from Rte. 571 to 

Rte. YY in 

Lawrence County.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

16.838 Miles $250000 $2676000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

6,961 65 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Upgrade 

Guardrail to 

current standards.

Southwest -

Lawrence - MO 

39 (8S2272) 

Pavement and 

safety 

improvements 

from I-44 to 0.2 

mile north of Olive 

Street in Aurora 

and on Rte. M 

from Rte. 96 to 

Rte. 174. Project 

involves bridge 

K0008. $849,000 

Open Container 

funds. $800,000 

from SAFETEA-L

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

14.303 Miles $849000 $2225000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

5,180 55 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add 2' Shoulders 

and Edgeline 

Rumbles. 

Upgrade guardrail 

to MGS

Southwest -

McDonald - MO 

76 (7S3176) 

Pavement and 

safety 

improvements 

from 1 mile east 

of I-49 to Rte. U.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

20.796 Miles $689000 $2371000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Rural Major 

Collector

1,454 55 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add 2' Shoulders 

and Edgline 

Rumbles.

Southwest -

Stone - MO 76 

(7P3098) Safety 

improvements on 

curves near 

Deerfoot trail east 

of Cape Fair.

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

0.228 Miles $87000 $87000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

3,872 50 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane Departure High Friction 

Surface 

Treatment

Southwest -

Taney - MO 76 

(7S3094) 

Pavement and 

safety 

improvements 

from east of Rte. 

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

12.283 Miles $597000 $1945000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

20,353 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add 2' Shoulders 

and Edgeline 

Rumbles. 

Upgrade guardrail 

to MGS
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 32 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

65 in Branson to 

Bull Shoals Lake. 

$597,000 Open 

Container Funds.

Southwest -

Taney - MO 76 

(8P2386) Safety 

improvements at 

Lakeshore Drive 

near Hollister.

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

0.112 Miles $49000 $49000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

6,516 50 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane Departure High Friction 

Surface 

Treatment

Southwest -

Taney - MO 76 

(8P2402) 

Intersection 

improvements at 

Lakeshore Drive 

near Hollister.

Roadway Superelevation / cross slope 0.055 Miles $77000 $77000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

18,780 35 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Add Low Profile 

Island. Fix 

Superelevation in 

the curve.

Southwest -

Taney - US 160 

(7P3161) Safety 

improvements 

near Silver Creek 

Road and at Rte. 

H.

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

0.544 Miles $217000 $217000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

6,516 55 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane Departure High Friction 

Surface 

Treatment

Southwest -

Various - Various 

(7P3080) On-call 

work zone 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in the rural 

Southwest 

District.

Speed 

management

Speed management - other 1 Numbers $25000 $25000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Work Zones Speed Limit 

Enforcement in 

Workzones

Southwest -

Various - Various 

(7P3196) Install 

chevron signs at 

various curves on 

various routes in 

the rural 

Southwest 

district.

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

1 Numbers $784000 $784000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 10,911 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Adding Chevrons 

to Curves.

Southwest -

Various - Various 

(8P3054) On-call 

work zone 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in the urban 

Southwest 

District.

Speed 

management

Speed management - other 1 Numbers $37000 $37000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Work Zones Speed Limit 

Enforcement in 

Workzones

Southwest -

Various - Various 

(8P3100) 

Intersection 

improvements to 

off-set left turns at 

Roadway Roadway - other 1 Numbers $1902000 $1902000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Intersections Offset lefts to 

allow turning 

vehicles to 

greater visibility.
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 33 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

various 

intersections in 

the urban 

Southwest 

District.

Southwest -

Vernon - US 54 

(7P3092) 

Pavement 

improvements 

east of Rte. AA.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

0.67 Miles $349000 $349000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

5,741 65 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Upgrade 

Guardrail to 

current standards.

Southwest -

Webster - IS 44 

(7I3099) Safety 

improvements on 

the eastbound 

lanes at Rte. B.

Roadway Pavement surface - high friction 

surface

1.333 Miles $460000 $460000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Interstate

17,302 70 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Lane Departure High Friction 

Surface 

Treatment

Southeast - Butler 

- RT B (9S3249) 

Pavement 

improvements 

and installation of 

rumble stripes 

from Bus. 60 to 

Rte. 51.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

7.198 Miles $889000 $1753000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

3,100 55 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add and improve 

shoulders

Southeast -

Howell - US 60 

(9P3300) 

Installation of 

rumble stripes at 

various locations 

from Bus. 63 in 

Willow Springs to 

County Road 256 

in Carter County.

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

80.856 Miles $179000 $179000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

2,400 65 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add and improve 

shoulders

Southeast -

Reynolds - MO 21 

(9P3162) 

Pavement 

improvements, 

addition of 

shoulders and 

railroad crossing 

upgrade from Rte. 

K near Ellington 

to Rte. 49 west of 

Lesterville and at 

Rte. K/Union 

Pacific railroad 

crossing in 

Annapolis. 

$1,668,000 Open 

Con

Roadway Roadway - other 20.346 Miles $1668000 $4543000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Various 1,800 60 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Roadway 

Departure

Improve roadway

Southeast - Scott 

- IS 55 (9I3111) 

Pavement and 

safety 

improvements 

Roadway Pavement surface -

miscellaneous

31.266 Miles $230000 $13112000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Lane Departure Improve roadway
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 34 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

from I-57 to N. of 

Rte. 61/62 

(Ristin), 3 miles 

S. of 162 

(Portageville) to 

0.8 mile S. of I155 (Hayti) and 

2.6 miles S. of 

Rte. E (Holland) 

to Arkan 

$801,180 MO119, 

$1,501,526 MO15

Southeast - Ste. 

Genevieve - RT H 

(9S3166) 

Pavement 

improvements 

and addition of 

two foot 

shoulders from 

east of Rte. 61 to 

Rte. 51.

Roadway Pavement surface -

miscellaneous

6.838 Miles $525000 $812000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Rural Major 

Collector

1,300 55 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add and improve 

shoulders

Southeast -

Stoddard - MO 51 

(9S3179) 

Pavement 

improvements 

and addition of 

two foot 

shoulders from 

0.9 mile south of 

Rte. 60 to Rte. B. 

$147,000 District 

Operating 

Budget.

Roadway Pavement surface -

miscellaneous

3.014 Miles $5000 $152000 Other Federal-aid 

Funds (i.e. 

STBG, NHPP)

Urban Major 

Collector

1,900 55 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add and improve 

shoulders

Southeast -

Texas - MO 17 

(9P3161) 

Pavement 

improvements 

and addition of 

two foot 

shoulders from 

Rte. 63 in 

Houston to Rte. 

106 in 

Summersville. 

$49,000 

Accelerated 

Innovation 

Deployment (AID) 

Demonstration 

funds.

Roadway Pavement surface -

miscellaneous

22.4 Miles $1663000 $3702000 Penalty Funds 

(23 U.S.C. 154)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

2,800 55 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Add and improve 

shoulders

Southeast -

Various - Various 

(9P3237) On-call 

work zone 

enforcement at 

various locations 

in Southeast 

District.

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Roadway signs and traffic 

control - other

1 Numbers $75000 $75000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 0 45 State Highway 

Agency

Spot Work Zones Increase 

Enforement 

efforts
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 35 of 69

RELATIONSHIP TO SHSP

PROJECT NAME IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY

SUBCATEGORY OUTPUTS OUTPUT TYPE HSIP PROJECT 

COST($)

TOTAL 

PROJECT 

COST($)

FUNDING 

CATEGORY

FUNCTIONAL 

CLASSIFICATION

AADT SPEED OWNERSHIP METHOD FOR 

SITE 

SELECTION

EMPHASIS 

AREA

STRATEGY

Southeast -

Various - Various 

(9P3304) Install 

chevrons at 

various locations 

in Southeast 

District.

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning signs 

and flashers

1 Numbers $322000 $322000 HSIP (23 U.S.C. 

148)

Various 0 0 State Highway 

Agency

Systemic Roadway 

Departure

Improve Curve 

Safety

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

AADT and Speed were set at zero (0) if there were various speeds/AADT through the project.
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 36 of 69

Safety Performance

General Highway Safety Trends

Present data showing the general highway safety trends in the State for the past five years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Fatalities 960 878 821 786 826 757 766 870 949

Serious Injuries 6,932 6,540 6,096 5,643 5,506 4,938 4,567 4,573 4,719

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 1.410 1.271 1.162 1.143 1.208 1.092 1.080 1.210 1.273

Serious injury rate (per 

HMVMT)

10.181 9.465 8.631 8.203 8.049 7.123 6.438 6.360 6.332

Number non-motorized 

fatalities

68 73 64 76 92 79 73 113 109

Number of non-motorized 

serious injuries

357 331 337 375 302 342 304 291 321
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 37 of 69

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Annual Fatalities

Fatalities 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Annual Serious Injuries

Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 38 of 69

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Fatality rate (per HMVMT)

Fatality rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT)

Serious injury rate (per HMVMT) 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 39 of 69

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Describe fatality data source.

FARS

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

To the maximum extent possible, present this data by functional classification and ownership.

Year 2016

Functional Classification Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Principal Arterial -

Interstate

40 177.6 0.06 0.25

Rural Principal Arterial -

Other Freeways and 

Expressways

44.2 191.8 0.06 0.27

Rural Principal Arterial -

Other

62.2 265.2 0.09 0.38

Rural Minor Arterial 88.2 407.8 0.12 0.58

340

360

380

400

420

440

460

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Non Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Fatalities and Serious Injuries 5 Year Rolling Avg.
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 40 of 69

Functional Classification Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Rural Minor Collector 21.4 104.6 0.03 0.15

Rural Major Collector 147 719.8 0.21 1.02

Rural Local Road or Street 78.6 433.4 0.11 0.61

Urban Principal Arterial -

Interstate

70.8 390.4 0.1 0.55

Urban Principal Arterial -

Other Freeways and 

Expressways

45.4 245.6 0.06 0.35

Urban Principal Arterial -

Other

83.2 640.6 0.12 0.9

Urban Minor Arterial 75 624.6 0.11 0.88

Urban Minor Collector 1.4 7.4 0 0.01

Urban Major Collector 31.2 285.6 0.04 0.4

Urban Local Road or Street 44.4 374.2 0.06 0.53
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 41 of 69

Year 2016

Roadways Number of Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious Injury Rate

(per HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

State Highway Agency 612.4 3,235.4 0.86 4.57

County Highway Agency

Town or Township 

Highway Agency

City of Municipal Highway 

Agency

State Park, Forest, or 

Reservation Agency

Local Park, Forest or 

Reservation Agency

Other State Agency

Other Local Agency

Private (Other than 

Railroad)

Railroad

State Toll Authority

Local Toll Authority

Other Public 

Instrumentality (e.g. 

Airport, School, University)

Indian Tribe Nation

City and County Highway 

Agency

221.2 1,644 0.31 2.32
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 42 of 69

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities by Functional Classification 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 43 of 69

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries by Functional 

Classification 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 44 of 69

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) by Functional 

Classification 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 45 of 69

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) by Functional 

Classification 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 46 of 69

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

State Highway Agency County and City

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities by Roadway Ownership 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 47 of 69

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

State Highway Agency County and City

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries by Roadway 

Ownership 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 48 of 69

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

State Highway Agency County and City

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) by Roadway 

Ownership 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 49 of 69

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Are there any other aspects of the general highway safety trends on which the State would like to 

elaborate?

Yes

Provide additional discussion related to general highway safety trends.

Overall fatalities and serious injuries were up in Missouri for 2016, which could be due to an increase in 

aggressive driving behaviors. Motorcycle and Pedestrian fatalities have been trending upward in recent 

years. MoDOT has started to place a large safety emphasis on providing safety improvements on state 

maintained minor roads. These safety improvements primarily consist of adding 2-foot shoulders with rumble 

strips as well as installing chevron signs on horizontal curves.

Safety Performance Targets

Safety Performance Targets

Calendar Year 2018 Targets * 

Number of Fatalities 857.7 

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

State Highway Agency County and City

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) by Roadway 

Ownership 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 50 of 69

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

The target is based on our 2016 Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). In this plan, 

the goal is to have fewer than 700 fatalities by 2020. The 2018 target was based on the 

historical 5-year rolling average of fatalities, the 2020 goal in the SHSP, and 

extrapolating an interim 5-year rolling average target for 2018. This target is in line 

with the SHSP to reduce the number of fatalities on Missouri's roadways. 

Number of Serious Injuries 4559.3 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

This target was developed by projecting the historical 5-year rolling average of serious 

injury crashes to 2018. The historical data used to develop the trend line consisted of a 

5-year rolling average from 2005 to 2015. This target is in line with the SHSP to 

reduce the number of serious injuries on Missouri's roadways. 

Fatality Rate 1.163 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

The fatality rate was calculated by taking a 5-year rolling average of historical and 

forecasted annual fatality rates. Historical fatality rates were derived from observed 

fatality totals and estimated Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). Forecasted rates 

were determined by using the number of fatalities target (developed from the SHSP 

target) and dividing by the estimated Annual VMT. It was assumed that Annual VMT 

would grow at a rate of 1% per year. This target is in line with the SHSP to reduce the 

number of fatalities on Missouri's roadways. 

Serious Injury Rate 6.191 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

The serious injury rate was calculated by taking a 5-year rolling average of historical 

and forecasted annual serious injury rates. Historical serious injury rates were derived 

from observed serious injury totals and estimated Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled 

(VMT). Forecasted rates were determined by using the number of serious injuries 

target and dividing by the estimated Annual VMT. It was assumed that Annual VMT 

would grow at a rate of 1% per year. This target is in line with the SHSP to reduce the 

number of serious injuries on Missouri's roadways. 

Total Number of Non-Motorized 

Fatalities and Serious Injuries 431.9 

Describe the basis for established target, including how it supports SHSP goals. 

In Missouri, there are approximately four non-motorized serious injuries for every 

non-motorized fatality. For this reason, the methodology for this target was influenced 

by the target for the number of motorized serious injuries. Achieving the 2018 number 

of serious injuries target requires an annual reduction of 4% in serious injury crashes. 
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 51 of 69

This 4% reduction was then applied to the non-motorized fatalities and serious injuries 

to forecast future year estimates. These future estimates, combined with historical 

data, allowed for calculating a 5-year rolling average, which was used to determine the 

Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries Target for 2018. This target 

is in line with the SHSP to reduce the number of non-motorized fatalities and serious 

injuries on Missouri's roadways. 

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Describe efforts to coordinate with other stakeholders (e.g. MPOs, SHSO) to establish safety performance 

targets. 

Missouri DOT includes the Highway Safety Division so the engineering and safety staff have been collaborating 

for more than a decade. MoDOT updated its Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) using a collaborative, team 

approach from Aug. 2015 to Oct. 2016. The team included external partners from emergency management, 

FHWA, FMCSA, hospitals, law enforcement, Missouri Department of Revenue, MPOs, NHTSA, RPCs and 

universities. The 2016 SHSP team identified a goal of fewer than 700 fatalities by 2020. SHSP revisions were 

shared periodically with the MPOs and RPCs. 

FHWA piloted its Safety Target Setting Coordination Workshop at MoDOT in May 2016 with FHWA, MoDOT, 

MPO, and NHTSA staff. Missouri safety data was reviewed for trends, along with assumptions and challenges. 

MoDOT conducts monthly calls with planning stakeholders. During the Sept. and Oct. 2016 calls, a draft target 

coordinating process was presented with feedback and consensus from the MPOs. In March of 2017, MoDOT 

calculated statewide and MPO data trends for each safety performance measure. This information was shared 

and discussed with MoDOT’s Executive Team, MPOs, FHWA, NHTSA, and FMCSA. After further feedback from 

partner groups, the methods and assumptions used to develop the performance targets were finalized in April 

2017. MoDOT then applied the agreed upon methodology to develop the safety performance targets and 

communicated them with the partners.

Does the State want to report additional optional targets? 

No

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Applicability of Special Rules

Does the HRRR special rule apply to the State for this reporting period? 

No

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 52 of 69

Provide the number of older driver and pedestrian fatalities and serious injuries for the past seven years.

PERFORMANCE 

MEASURES 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number of Older Driver and 

Pedestrian Fatalities

98 116 94 103 110 120 137

Number of Older Driver and 

Pedestrian Serious Injuries

441 402 379 378 352 355 361

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

# of Fatalities and Serious Injuries

Years

Number of Older Driver and Pedestrian Fatalities and Serious Injuries by 

Year.

Fatalities Serious Injuries
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 53 of 69

Evaluation

Program Effectiveness

How does the State measure effectiveness of the HSIP?

Change in fatalities and serious injuries

Other-Evaluation of individual HSIP projects and programs

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Based on the measures of effectiveness selected previously, describe the results of the State's program 

level evaluations.

MoDOT will evaluate specific HSIP projects to assess their effectiveness at reducing fatal and serious injury 

crashes. This information is then used to promote or discourage the use of a particular safety countermeasure.

For systemic improvements, MoDOT tracks the change in the number of fatalities as the amount of a 

safety improvement is further deployed. This allows MoDOT to monitor the safety benefits returned on its 

continued investment of a systemic strategy.

What other indicators of success does the State use to demonstrate effectiveness and success of the 

Highway Safety Improvement Program?

HSIP Obligations

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

MoDOT's planning office tracks the programming of safety funds to ensure they do not lapse on HSIP funds.

Are there any significant programmatic changes that have occurred since the last reporting period? 

Yes

Describe significant program changes that have occurred since the last reporting period.

MoDOT's leadership increased the amount of safety funds available for programming by $10 million for 

FY2017.

As of this reporting period, every MoDOT district now has a curve treated with a High Friction Surface 

Treatment (HFST). This has provided the opportunity for MoDOT staff to become familiar with this safety 

countermeasure and get first hand experience with its application in the field.
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 54 of 69

Effectiveness of Groupings or Similar Types of Improvements

Present and describe trends in SHSP emphasis area performance measures.

Year 2016

SHSP Emphasis Area Targeted 

Crash Type

Number of 

Fatalities

(5-yr avg)

Number of 

Serious 

Injuries

(5-yr avg)

Fatality 

Rate

(per 

HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Serious 

Injury Rate

(per 

HMVMT)

(5-yr avg)

Other 1 Other 2 Other 3

Lane Departure 665 3,215.4 0.94 4.54

Intersections 135.4 2,186.6 0.19 3.09

Pedestrians 86.6 251.2 0.12 0.35

Bicyclists 6.6 60.8 0.01 0.09

Older Drivers 173.2 741.4 0.24 1.05

Motorcyclists 95.2 586.8 0.13 0.83

Work Zones 8.2 49.6 0.01 0.07
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 55 of 69

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Fatalities

Number of Fatalities 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 56 of 69

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Lane Departure includes Two Vehicle Analysis = “Front to Front” or “Sideswipe (Opposite Direction), Sequence of Events 

= “Cross Center of Road” or “Ran off Road - Right” or “Ran off Road - Left”.

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

Fatality Rate

Fatality Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Serious Injury Rate

Serious Injury Rate (per HMVMT) 

5 Year Average

2008-2012 2009-2013 2010-2014 2011-2015 2012-2016
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 57 of 69

All rates are based off of the total statewide VMT. MoDOT does not collect VMT specific to motorcycles, 

older drivers, etc.

Has the State completed any countermeasure effectiveness evaluations during the reporting period?

Yes

Please provide the following summary information for each countermeasure effectiveness evaluation. 

CounterMeasures: RCUT (J-Turns) 

Description: 

This was an internal study that 

evaluated the safety impacts of 

installing J-Turns (RCUT) on 

Missouri roadways. 

Target Crash Type: Angle 

Number of Installations: 19 

Number of Installations: 19 

Miles Treated: 

Years Before: 5 years for 15 locations 

Years After: 61 years over 19 locations 

Methodology: Simple before/after 

Results: 

The net benefit of the 19 J-Turn 

locations across the state has been 

significant. Collectively, total 

crashes at these intersections are 

down 25%. More importantly, 

fatal crashes are down 88% and 

serious injury crashes are down 

78%. In addition, right angle 

crashes, the crash type most 

responsible for fatalities and 

serious injuries at intersections, 

are also down 88%. 

File Name: Statewide Analysis of J-Turns.pdf
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 58 of 69

Project Effectiveness

Provide the following information for previously implemented projects that the State evaluated this reporting period. 

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY IMPROVEMENT TYPE PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL INJURY

BEFORE

ALL INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

MO 32 Shoulder 

Improvements in 

Dent County 

(5P3013)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

18.00 12.00 1.00 10.00 4.00 10.00 16.00 39.00 32.00 7.6

US 54 Intersection 

Improvements in 

Cole County 

(9P2263B)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

Intersection 

geometry

Auxiliary lanes - modify 

left-turn lane offset

3.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 3.00 0.3

Route M Cole 

County Pavement 

and Signing 

Improvements 

(5L1701C)

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Curve-related warning 

signs and flashers

10.00 2.00 1.00 4.00 14.00 3.00 -388.6

MO 87 Pavement 

and shoulder 

improvements 

from I-70 to 

California 

(5S3012)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

51.00 43.00 2.00 1.00 10.00 2.00 15.00 11.00 78.00 57.00 3.4

MO 6 

Daviess/DeKalb 

Shoulders and 

rumble stripe 

(1P3027)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

18.00 24.00 2.00 1.00 9.00 6.00 29.00 31.00 0.6

US 36 

Buchanan/DeKalb 

Resurfacing, 

shoulders and 

rumble stripe 

(1P2195)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

20.00 30.00 1.00 1.00 15.00 16.00 36.00 47.00 -0.2

US 71 Andrew 

Rurfacing, 

shoulders and 

rumble stripe 

(1P1039)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

6.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 12.00 5.00 8

US 169 Buchanan 

Shoulders and 

rumble stripe 

(1P2215)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

72.00 72.00 2.00 7.00 12.00 30.00 31.00 109.00 117.00 -12.1

MO 13 Lafayette 

Shoulders and 

rumble stripe 

(3P3012)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

11.00 24.00 2.00 1.00 10.00 8.00 23.00 33.00 1

I-49 at MO 58 

Cass Interchange 

Improvements 

(4P2389)

Urban Principal 

Arterial -

Interstate

Interchange 

design

Interchange design - other 8.00 1.00 3.00 11.00 1.00 0.5
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 59 of 69

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY IMPROVEMENT TYPE PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL INJURY

BEFORE

ALL INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

US 69 and MO 45 

Clay Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(4P3030)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

86.00 80.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 21.00 25.00 111.00 110.00 -2.7

MO 273 Platte 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(4S2182)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

9.00 14.00 3.00 11.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 14.00 30.00 -269.6

MO 2 Cass 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(4S3031)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

22.00 14.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 16.00 9.00 43.00 25.00 9.3

MO 47 Lincoln 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble 

stripes(3P2228G)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

149.00 121.00 2.00 3.00 17.00 22.00 67.00 59.00 235.00 205.00 -6.2

MO 79 Marion 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(3P2193)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

19.00 14.00 1.00 4.00 2.00 6.00 6.00 30.00 22.00 37.6

US 24 Marion 

Friction 

improvements for 

interchange ramps 

(2P3012)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

Roadway Pavement surface - high 

friction surface

14.00 13.00 1.00 4.00 9.00 3.00 28.00 16.00 32.4

MO 3 Randolph 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(2P3010)

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

11.00 13.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 2.00 16.00 17.00 -32

MO 30 

Intersection 

improvements at 

Dillion Rd, 

Caroline Rd, and 

Delores Dr 

(J6P2373C)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Intersection 

geometry

Intersection geometry -

other

61.00 50.00 4.00 3.00 12.00 15.00 77.00 68.00 0.1

MO 30 Signing 

and guardrail from 

Rte. 141 to Rte. B. 

(J6P2373F)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Roadway signs 

and traffic control

Roadway signs and traffic 

control - other

1562.00 804.00 10.00 9.00 109.00 63.00 406.00 206.00 2087.00 1082.00 129.2

MO 30 Safety 

improvements 

including signal 

upgrades and 

advanced warning 

systems from Rte. 

141 to Rte. B. 

(J6P2373G)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other 

Freeways and 

Expressways

Intersection traffic 

control

Intersection signing - add 

basic advance warning

910.00 848.00 3.00 12.00 64.00 54.00 241.00 185.00 1218.00 1099.00 -33.7

Rt PP Pavement, 

shoulder, and 

curve 

Rural Major 

Collector

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - paved or 

other

23.00 21.00 3.00 6.00 12.00 29.00 36.00 -2.3
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 60 of 69

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY IMPROVEMENT TYPE PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL INJURY

BEFORE

ALL INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

improvements 

from Twin Rivers 

Road to Rte. 30. 

(J6S3021)

Rt D Pavement, 

shoulder and 

curve 

improvements 

from Rte. Z to MO 

94. (J6S2192C)

Rural Major 

Collector

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - paved or 

other

27.00 71.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 4.00 10.00 10.00 39.00 87.00 -7.6

Rt D Pavement, 

shoulder, and 

curve 

improvements 

from Rte. T to Rte. 

Z (J6S3018)

Rural Major 

Collector

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - paved or 

other

17.00 26.00 1.00 6.00 5.00 23.00 32.00 -3.5

Rt DD Pavement, 

shoulder and 

curve 

improvements 

from 2 miles north 

of Rte. D to Rte. 

94 (J6S2310B)

Rural Major 

Collector

Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - paved or 

other

21.00 16.00 1.00 9.00 3.00 31.00 19.00 0.6

Rt Z Pavement 

and shoulder 

improvements 

from I-70 to Rte. 

D. (J6S2322)

Urban Collector Shoulder 

treatments

Widen shoulder - paved or 

other

42.00 93.00 2.00 4.00 2.00 11.00 13.00 59.00 108.00 6.7

MO 109 

Intersection 

improvements at 

Pond Grover 

Loop. (J6S2046B) 

Urban Minor 

Arterial

Intersection traffic 

control

Modify traffic signal -

modernization/replacement

5.00 11.00 5.00 11.00 -0.1

Rt D Signal, 

lighting and ADA 

facilities 

improvements at 

Skinker Parkway, 

Hodiamont 

Avenue and Union 

Blvd. (J6S2242)

Urban Principal 

Arterial - Other

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Pedestrian signal - modify 

existing

77.00 104.00 3.00 3.00 38.00 37.00 118.00 144.00 -0.1

MO 366 

Pavement Seal 

and ADA facility 

improvements 

from the City 

Limits to 

Broadway 

(J6S2234)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians 

and bicyclists

485.00 457.00 1.00 8.00 5.00 184.00 136.00 678.00 598.00 57.2

MO 100 

Pavement Overlay 

and ADA Facility 

improvements 

from the City 

Limits to 

Vandeventer 

(J6P2236), 

inlcuded road diet 

from McCausland 

Urban Minor 

Arterial

Pedestrians and 

bicyclists

Miscellaneous pedestrians 

and bicyclists

194.00 204.00 2.00 1.00 4.00 4.00 77.00 61.00 277.00 270.00 34.9
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 61 of 69

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY IMPROVEMENT TYPE PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL INJURY

BEFORE

ALL INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

to Kingshighway 

to include 

dedicated bike 

lanes.

US 54 Benton 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(5P0915)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

133.00 59.00 3.00 10.00 3.00 28.00 13.00 174.00 75.00 33.6

MO 7, MO 83, & 

RT U Benton 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(5P2155)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

92.00 65.00 6.00 4.00 17.00 17.00 115.00 86.00 1.8

MO 76 Stone 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(7P3012) 

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

42.00 65.00 1.00 1.00 8.00 4.00 29.00 29.00 80.00 99.00 1.4

US 160 Taney 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(8L1300L)

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

209.00 191.00 1.00 1.00 19.00 17.00 69.00 61.00 298.00 270.00 2.7

MO 176 Taney 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(8L1300O)

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

7.00 9.00 5.00 3.00 12.00 12.00 0.6

US 160 Greene 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(8L1300T)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

16.00 30.00 1.00 2.00 5.00 3.00 9.00 8.00 31.00 43.00 -11

MO 86 Stone 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(8P2385)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

52.00 79.00 3.00 1.00 21.00 8.00 6.00 30.00 82.00 118.00 18.8

US 65 Christian 

Intersection safety 

improvements at 

BB and A 

(8P2418)

Rural Principal 

Arterial - Other

Intersection traffic 

control

Intersection flashers - add 

"when flashing" warning 

sign-mounted

3.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 1.6

MO 265 Taney 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(8S2442)

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

24.00 31.00 1.00 4.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 38.00 42.00 -69

MO 38 Webster 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(8S2457B)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

26.00 34.00 1.00 4.00 3.00 7.00 5.00 37.00 43.00 -4.2
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 62 of 69

LOCATION FUNCTIONAL 

CLASS

IMPROVEMENT 

CATEGORY IMPROVEMENT TYPE PDO

BEFORE

PDO

AFTER

FATALITY

BEFORE

FATALITY

AFTER

SERIOUS 

INJURY

BEFORE

SERIOUS 

INJURY

AFTER

ALL INJURY

BEFORE

ALL INJURY

AFTER

TOTAL

BEFORE

TOTAL

AFTER

EVALUATION 

RESULTS

(BENEFIT/COST 

RATIO)

MO 125 Greene 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(8S3018)

Urban Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

27.00 27.00 1.00 1.00 6.00 2.00 23.00 20.00 57.00 50.00 1.7

MO 64 Polk 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(9P2261B)

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

17.00 15.00 13.00 17.00 30.00 32.00 -0.9

RT DD Webster 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(9P2261D)

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

6.00 15.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 4.00 12.00 20.00 0.2

9P2261E Greene 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(9P2261E)

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

16.00 16.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 5.00 7.00 13.00 27.00 36.00 -2.7

MO 34 Bollinger 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(0P0922)

Other Principle 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

0

MO 51 Bollinger 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(0S2262)

Rural Minor 

Arterial

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

52.00 33.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 11.00 13.00 68.00 47.00 3

US 61 New 

Madrid Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(0S2287)

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

61.00 80.00 1.00 2.00 8.00 10.00 34.00 23.00 104.00 115.00 -66.3

IS 55 Scott Install 

guardcable from 

IS 57 to Arkansas 

State Line 

(9P2263)

Interstate Roadside Barrier - cable 134.00 227.00 1.00 1.00 10.00 10.00 39.00 39.00 184.00 277.00 0

RT Y St Francois 

Shoulder 

improvements and 

rumble stripes 

(9P2261)

Rural Major 

Collector

Roadway Rumble strips - edge or 

shoulder

36.00 24.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 4.00 10.00 7.00 50.00 37.00 -0.4

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Evaluation Results are based on a benefit/cost of the net reduction in crashes over the cost to implement the improvement.

The following crash costs were used in the evaluation (2015 Crash Costs in Missouri)

• Fatal = $5,026,924
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 63 of 69

• Serious Injury = $314,183

• Minor Injury = $81,687

• PDO Crash = $4,569

Overall, fatal crashes increased by 11 after these safety improvements were deployed. This could be due to the increase in aggressive driving behaviors on Missouri's roadways. That said, serious injury, minor injury, and pdo crashes all 

decreased after the safety improvements were installed. These reductions help to support the benefits that these safety devices have had for Missourians.

• Fatal = Increased by 11

• Serious Injury = Decreased by 102

• Minor Injury = Decreased by 358

• PDO Crash = Decreased by 713

Are there any other aspects of the overall HSIP effectiveness on which the State would like to elaborate?

Yes

Describe any other aspects of HSIP effectiveness on which the State would like to elaborate.

In November 2016, MoDOT hosted a peer exchange with local agencies to learn best practices for using HSIP on local roadways. Overall, Missouri has had historical success in reducing roadway fatalities and serious injuries due to the 

systemic approach used in the state.
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 64 of 69

Compliance Assessment

What date was the State’s current SHSP approved by the Governor or designated State representative?

 10/17/2016

What are the years being covered by the current SHSP?

From: 2016 To: 2020

When does the State anticipate completing it’s next SHSP update?

 2020

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Provide the current status (percent complete) of MIRE fundamental data elements collection efforts using the table below. 

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

MIRE NAME (MIRE NO.) STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

ROADWAY SEGMENT

Segment Identifier (12) 100 100 100 100 100 100

Route Number (8) 100 100

Route/Street Name (9) 100 100

Federal Aid/Route Type 

(21)

100 100

Rural/Urban Designation 

(20)

100 100 100 100

Surface Type (23) 100 30 100 30

Begin Point Segment 

Descriptor (10)

100 100 100 100 100 100

End Point Segment 

Descriptor (11)

100 100 100 100 100 100

Segment Length (13) 100 100

Direction of Inventory (18) 100 100

Functional Class (19) 100 100 100 100 100 100

Median Type (54) 30 30
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 65 of 69

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

MIRE NAME (MIRE NO.) STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Access Control (22) 100 20

One/Two Way Operations 

(91)

100 20

Number of Through Lanes 

(31)

100 30 100 20

Average Annual Daily 

Traffic (79)

100 80 100 0

AADT Year (80) 100 80

Type of Governmental 

Ownership (4)

100 100 100 100 100 100

INTERSECTION

Unique Junction Identifier 

(120)

100 100

Location Identifier for 

Road 1 Crossing Point 

(122)

100 100

Location Identifier for 

Road 2 Crossing Point 

(123)

100 100

Intersection/Junction 

Geometry (126)

100 100

Intersection/Junction 

Traffic Control (131)

100 80

AADT for Each 

Intersecting Road (79)

100 80

AADT Year (80) 100 80

Unique Approach 

Identifier (139)

100 100

INTERCHANGE/RAMP

Unique Interchange 

Identifier (178)

100 100

Location Identifier for 

Roadway at Beginning of 

Ramp Terminal (197)

100 100

Location Identifier for 

Roadway at Ending Ramp 

Terminal (201)

100 100

Ramp Length (187) 100 100

Roadway Type at 

Beginning of Ramp 

Terminal (195)

100 100
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 66 of 69

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - SEGMENT

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - INTERSECTION

NON LOCAL PAVED

ROADS - RAMPS LOCAL PAVED ROADS UNPAVED ROADS

MIRE NAME (MIRE NO.) STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE STATE NON-STATE

Roadway Type at End 

Ramp Terminal (199)

100 100

Interchange Type (182) 100 100

Ramp AADT (191) 100 100

Year of Ramp AADT (192) 100 100

Functional Class (19) 100 100

Type of Governmental 

Ownership (4)

100 100

Totals (Average Percent 

Complete):

96.11 77.22 100.00 92.50 100.00 100.00 100.00 72.22 100.00 100.00

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Describe actions the State will take moving forward to meet the requirement to have complete access to the MIRE fundamental data elements on all public roads by September 30, 2026.

MoDOT will use several methods over the next several years to meet the requirements for the collection of FDE’s on all public roads. MoDOT will prioritize these needs by addressing the Non-Local Paved roads data gaps first.

Surface Type/Number of Lanes/one-two way operations/access control/Median Type – These data items will be addressed through the cooperative program we have with our local authorities that ensures we have complete and correct geospatial network. As we continue these reviews in the future, we will ask 

them to provide these additional four items. Also, much of this data can be collected through other sources such as aerial photography and video logging. The targeted completion data for the collection and storage of this data is December 31, 2023.

The second priority will be the Local Paved Roads.

Surface Type/Number of through lanes – These items will be collected at the same time they are collected on Non-Local Paved roads. Since geospatial reviews include all public roads, this data will have already been collected.

AADT – it is estimated that an additional 80,000 traffic count locations will be needed to fulfill this requirement. Based on historical cost and practices, this will equate to an additional cost of $2 million annually. After a complete inventory of the other FDE’s is available, a better estimate will be able to be 

established. The funding required to collect these additional volume counts will come at the expense of an equal value of safety improvements on the system. In addition, MoDOT has worked with several local agencies to “share” traffic data, but there has been little success. Few agencies collect traffic data in a 

manner that allows the calculation of AADT. Local government collect traffic data, often one time only, for specific purposes like signal timing. Local agencies do not have permanent sites or a history of short term counts available to create AADT’s. We anticipate, with the additional investment of $2 million 

annually, the AADT data for Local Paved Roads could be completed by September 30, 2026.

Provide the suspected serious injury identifier, definition and attributes used by the State for both the crash report form and the crash database using the table below. Please also indicate whether or not these elements are 

compliant with the MMUCC 4th edition criteria for data element P5. Injury Status, suspected serious injury. 

CRITERIA SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY 

IDENTIFIER(NAME) MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY DEFINITION MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY ATTRIBUTES(DESCRIPTORS) MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * 

Crash Report Form Disabling No N/A No N/A No

Crash Report Form Instruction Manual Disabling No When observed at the scene, the person 

sustained non-fatal injuries that prevent 

walking, driving, or continuing activities the 

person was capable of performing prior to 

the crash. Transport by ambulance from 

the scene does not necessarily indicate the 

individual sustained disabling injuries.

No Severe laceration

Broken or distorted limb

Skull or chest injury

Abdominal injury

Unconsciousness at or when taken from 

the crash scene

Unable to leave the crash scene without 

assistance

No

Crash Database Disabling No N/A No N/A No

Crash Database Data Dictionary Disabling No When observed at the scene, the person 

sustained non-fatal injuries that prevent 

walking, driving, or continuing activities the 

No Severe laceration

Broken or distorted limb

Skull or chest injury

No
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 67 of 69

CRITERIA SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY 

IDENTIFIER(NAME) MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY DEFINITION MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * SUSPECTED SERIOUS INJURY ATTRIBUTES(DESCRIPTORS) MMUCC 4TH EDITION COMPLIANT * 

person was capable of performing prior to 

the crash. Transport by ambulance from 

the scene does not necessarily indicate the 

individual sustained disabling injuries. 

Abdominal injury

Unconsciousness at or when taken from 

the crash scene

Unable to leave the crash scene without 

assistance

Please describe the actions the State is taking to become compliant by April 15, 2019.

The Missouri State Highway Patrol (MSHP) has already begun communicating with their staff and local law enforcement partners regarding upcoming changes to the crash report form and instruction manual in order to implement the new 

Suspected Serious Injury definition. MoDOT's crash database utilizes the same definition as what is used by the MSHP and will be updated concurrently with MSHP's rollout of the new definition.

Enter additional comments here to clarify your response for this question or add supporting information.

Did the State conduct an HSIP program assessment during the reporting period?

Yes

Describe the purpose and outcomes of the State’s HSIP program assessment.

The 2016 HSIP assessment highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of Missouri's HSIP process. Some of the best practices identified include:

• The ability to align its safety projects with other transportation improvements to save on costs and extend HSIP benefits.

• The flexibility for each district to program HSIP funds to projects that best suit the needs of their region.

• The systemic approach to safety improvements, which has been widely regarded as a best practice nationally.

One of the weaknesses of the current HSIP is a lack of safety improvements on local roads. Recognizing this issue, MoDOT hosted a peer exchange, in the fall of 2016, with Federal, State, and local agencies from a variety of states. Key 

takeaways from the peer exchange included:

• Strong relationships and partnerships between State and local agencies are key to successful HSIP local road safety policies.

• Local agencies and officials often need technical support or techinical guianace to overcome technical expertise barriers.

• Data driven and systemic safety improvement practices lend authority to project selection decisions and make it easier to work with stakeholders.

• Regional or county/parish safety plans can be a useful tool for guiding project selection and spending.

• Application and implementation procedures need to be documented but flexible enough to handle unique circumstances and needs.
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 68 of 69

Optional Attachments

Program Structure:

Project Implementation:

Safety Performance:

Evaluation:

Statewide Analysis of J-Turns.pdf

Compliance Assessment:
2017 Missouri Highway Safety Improvement Program

Page 69 of 69

Glossary

5 year rolling 

average 

means the average of five individuals, consecutive annual points of data (e.g. annual 

fatality rate). 

Emphasis area means a highway safety priority in a State’s SHSP, identified through a data-driven, 

collaborative process. 

Highway safety 

improvement 

project 

means strategies, activities and projects on a public road that are consistent with a State 

strategic highway safety plan and corrects or improves a hazardous road location or 

feature or addresses a highway safety problem. 

HMVMT means hundred million vehicle miles traveled. 

Non-infrastructure 

projects 

are projects that do not result in construction. Examples of non-infrastructure projects 

include road safety audits, transportation safety planning activities, improvements in the 

collection and analysis of data, education and outreach, and enforcement activities. 

Older driver special 

rule 

applies if traffic fatalities and serious injuries per capita for drivers and pedestrians over 

the age of 65 in a State increases during the most recent 2-year period for which data are 

available, as defined in the Older Driver and Pedestrian Special Rule Interim Guidance 

dated February 13, 2013. 

Performance 

measure 

means indicators that enable decision-makers and other stakeholders to monitor changes 

in system condition and performance against established visions, goals, and objectives. 

Programmed funds mean those funds that have been programmed in the Statewide Transportation 

Improvement Program (STIP) to be expended on highway safety improvement projects. 

Roadway 

Functional 

Classification 

means the process by which streets and highways are grouped into classes, or systems, 

according to the character of service they are intended to provide. 

Strategic Highway 

Safety Plan (SHSP) 

means a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary plan, based on safety data developed by a 

State Department of Transportation in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 148. 

Systematic refers to an approach where an agency deploys countermeasures at all locations across a 

system. 

Systemic safety 

improvement 

means an improvement that is widely implemented based on high risk roadway features 

that are correlated with specific severe crash types. 

Transfer 

means, in accordance with provisions of 23 U.S.C. 126, a State may transfer from an 

apportionment under section 104(b) not to exceed 50 percent of the amount apportioned 

for the fiscal year to any other apportionment of the State under that section.