alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Grady PATRICK, as father and next friend of David Michael Patrick, a deceased minor, Appellant, v. W. E. GILLEN and Kathleen Gillen, his wife, Appellees.

No. 68-867.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 18, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3011 

To prohibit the Secretary of State from issuing a passport, passport card, 

or Consular Report of Birth Abroad that includes the unspecified (X) 

gender designation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 4, 2023 

Mr. VANCE (for himself, Mr. CASSIDY, and Mr. BUDD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of State from issuing a passport, 

passport card, or Consular Report of Birth Abroad that 

includes the unspecified (X) gender designation, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Passport Sanity Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3011 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION REGARDING CERTAIN GENDER DES2 IGNATION ON PASSPORTS, PASSPORT CARDS, 

3 AND CONSULAR REPORTS OF BIRTH ABROAD 

4 ISSUED BY DEPARTMENT OF STATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State shall— 

6 (1) ensure each application for a covered docu7 ment includes only the gender designations male and 

8 female; and 

9 (2) prohibit the issuing of a covered document 

10 that includes the unspecified (X) gender designation. 

11 (b) COVERED DOCUMENT DEFINED.—In this section, 

12 the term ‘‘covered document’’ means a passport, passport 

13 card, or Consular Report of Birth Abroad issued by the 

14 Department of State. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          34,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,400
<INVENTORY>                                     39,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,300
<PP&E>                                         751,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                 408,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 623,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          253,900
<BONDS>                                        406,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (85,200)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   623,000
<SALES>                                      1,360,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,360,700
<CGS>                                          391,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,323,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (15,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (300)
<CHANGES>                                         (700)
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,400
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
#### The LEWIS STATE BANK, Appellant, v. Paul FRANK, a/k/a Paul R. Frank, David Hirsch, Robert Greenberg, and Mary Lou Nix, Appellees.

No. HH-374.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 19, 1978.

John D. Buchanan, Jr., of Henry, Buchanan, Mick & English, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim L. Dye of Dye & Thrasher, Mark H. Rodman, Tallahassee, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs, the record and oral argument, we affirm the judgment of the trial court which found that the appellees were discharged by payment of the original note executed by the parties. Having affirmed on this issue, it is unnecessary and we do not consider the other issues raised by either the appellant or the appel-lees.

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

McCORD, C. J., and MILLS and BOYER, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
advisory committee meeting of the National Institute of Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel

    Committee Name: MBRS Subcommittee.
    Date: November 13-14, 1997.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: Natcher Conference Center, Conference Room C, 45 Cener 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-6200.
    Contact Person: Bruce K. Wetzel, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIGMS, Office of Scientific Review, 45 Center Drive, 
Room 2AS-19, Bethesda, MD 20892-6200.
    Purpose: To review and evaluate program project applications.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6). Title 5 U.S.C. The 
discussions of these applications could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.821, 
Biophysics and Physiological Sciences; 93.859, Pharmacological 
Sciences; 93.862, Genetics Research; 93.863, Cellular and Molecular 
Basis of Disease Research; 93.880, Minority Access Research Careers 
[MARC]; and 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support [MBRS].)

    Dated: October 9, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-27444 Filed 10-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Connie W. PENNINGTON v. Wayne PENNINGTON.

No. 50154.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 22, 1978.

Thomas R. Mayfield, Jackson, for appellant.

Tullos & Tullos, Eugene C. Tullos, Raleigh, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Smith County; J. W. Walker, Chancellor.

Before SMITH, P. J., and ROBERTSON and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., and SUGG, WALKER, BROOM, BOWLING and COFER, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-60334

LUIS ENRIQUE LOO KUNG-LAY, Petitioner,

VERSUS

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration and Naturalization Service

(A72-807-758) February 8, 1999 Before JOLLY, DAVIS and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * After careful review of the record and consideration of the briefs and argument of counsel, we are persuaded that the decision of the BIA is supported by substantial evidence and that the BIA committed no reversible error. Accordingly, its order of May 5, 1997 is
AFFIRMED.
STEPHEN ANTONIO 

HAWKINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-0368

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 8, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Russell L. Healey, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel Steinberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm this appeal in all respects, but write to address the trial court’s 

imposition of the $100 Sheriff’s Investigatory Costs. The appellant filed a Florida
2

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) motion challenging the imposition of the 

costs where there was no record indication that the agency had requested them, and 

the State concedes error. While the trial court eventually entered an order partially 

granting the appellant’s motion and striking the costs, the order and the amended 

judgment and sentence were filed more than sixty days from the date the appellant 

filed his motion. As such, the order and corrected judgment and sentence are legal 

nullities. See Ogden v. State, 117 So. 3d 479, 480 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). 

We affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence, but remand for entry of a 

corrected judgment and sentence striking the $100 Sheriff’s Investigatory Costs.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
**Exhibit 32.4**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the Amendment to the Annual Report of KeyTechnology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period endingSeptember 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Phyllis C. Best, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Phyllis C. Best |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Phyllis C. Best           |
| Chief Financial Officer   |
| January 23, 2004     |

 

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of TransTexas Gas Corporation (the "Company") on Form S-3 (33-91494) of, and the
references to, our reserve report dated February 1, 2000 ("Reserve Report"), and
to the use of our name under the caption "Experts" and elsewhere therein in the
form and context in which they appear. We also consent to the references to our
Reserve Report and to the use of our name in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended January 31, 2000 in the form and context in which they
appear.

                                        NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

                                        By:       /s/ DANNY D. SIMMONS
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                     Danny D. Simmons
                                                   Senior Vice President

Houston, Texas
May 1, 2000
Exhibit 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Satoru
Hirai, Former Chief Operating and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
company for the dates and periods covered by the report.

This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the
Chief Executive Officer of the Company (or equivalent) with the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be used by any person
or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.


                                        /s/ Satoru Hirai
                                        -----------------
                                        Satoru Hirai
                                        Former Chief Operating and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        April 14, 2004
**EXHIBIT 10.10**            **AmendmentNo. 2 Severance Agreement**

             ThisAmendment No. 2 to Severance Agreement is made and entered into as of the 28thday of November 2000, by and between Fourth Shift Corporation, a Minnesotacorporation (the “Company”) and M. M. Stuckey (“Executive”) the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company.

             WHEREAS,Executive and the Company are parties to that certain Amended and RestatedSeverance Agreement dated as of October 21, 1997, as amended by the Amendmentthereto dated April 20, 1999 (the “Agreement”);

             WHEREAS,the Executive and the Company wish to further amend the Agreement to extend itsterm, provide for extended exerciseability of Executive’s stock options after achange of control, and to provide for lump sum payment of any welfare benefitsprovided Executive upon such change of control.

             NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, and for other good andvaluable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is herebyacknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1.          Termof Agreement.  The Agreement is hereby extended so as toremain in effect until cancelled by mutual written agreement of the Company andthe Executive.

2.          Extensionof Option Exercise.  Section 2(i)(x) of the Agreement is herebyamended to provide that Executive shall have the right to exercise all optionsto the extent specified therein for a period of either (i) the time aftertermination set forth in the option agreement or (ii) at the election of theExecutive, and provided that the Executive agrees that the option shall becomea nonqualified stock option after such election, for the remainder of theregular term of such option.

3.          Benefits.  Section 4(b)(ii) of the Agreement is herebyamended to read in its entirety as follows:

             “(ii)(x) pay to the insurer, all remaining premiums under the Medical Plan and theLong Term Care Policy outlined in the Executive Retirement Plan dated as ofJuly 7, 1999, up to a maximum of $4,500 a month through July 1, 2004, and (y)pay to the life insurer all remaining Company premiums that would be payable bythe Company for the Company’s contribution under the Executive’s split dollar life insurance policydated September 1, 1991.”

             INWITNESS, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 2 as of the date firstabove written.

 

FOURTH SHIFT CORPORATION
| By                                   |                                        |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|  Its                            |     M.  M. Stuckey |
|                                 |                                   |
| Approved  by Compensation Committee: |                                   |
|                                 | Robert  M. Price                       |  |
|                                 | Mike  Adams                            |  |
|                                      |                                        |  |  |
Case 1:06-cv-00036-MBC   Document 22   Filed 06/19/06   Page 1 of 2

Case 1:06-cv-00036-MBC   Document 22   Filed 06/19/06   Page 2 of 2
Memorandum

Subject: INFORMATION: Clarifications on 

Implementing the AASHTO Manual for 

Assessing Safety Hardware, 2016 Edition 

Date: 

HAY O 8 2018

1 From: Michael S. Griffith~~- ---, / AJO In Reply Refer To: 

Director, Office of Safety Technologies ~ HSST-1 

To:· Division Administrators 

Directors of Field Services 

Federal Lands Highway Division Directors 

PURPOSE 

The purpose ofthis memorandum is to provide clarification on technical and 

implementation issues pertaining to the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety 

Hardware (MASH), 2016 Edition. 

INFORMATION 

In December 2015, the AASHTO/FHWA joint implementation agreement for 

AASHTO MASH was successfully balloted by AASHTO's former Standing Committee 

on Highways and approved by FHWA. The agreement was executed to define actions 

needed for full implementation of MASH by December 31 , 2019. The agreement 

establishes sunset dates for AASHTO MASH compliance for various types of safety 

hardware as well as defines FHWA and AASHTO's responsibilities in implementing 

MASH. 

Since the release ofthe Memorandum pertaining to the AASHTO/FHWA Joint 

Implementation Agreement for AASHTO MASH, dated January 7, 2016, we have 

received many questions on how FHWA and AASHTO are moving forward with the 

joint implementation agreement. In response, FHWA's Office of Safety and 

AASHTO's Technical Committee on Roadside Safety (TCRS) established a joint 

AASHTO/FHWA technical working group of staff from State transportation 

departments, FHWA, and accredited crash testing laboratories. The working group · 

developed responses to the most common questions received on MASH 

implementation. The responses can be viewed at 

(https://desi gn. transportation.org/mash-implementatioDL). 
2 

SUMMARY 

Please share this memorandum with your State DOT. AASHTO TCRS and FHW A will 

continue to monitor the implementation of AASHTO's MASH and will provide 

clarification as needed on the above referenced website. If you need further 

information, please contact William P. Longstreet at 202-366-0087.
Exhibit 32.1


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of The Bralorne  Mining  Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  October 24, 2005


/s/ Jeff Yenyou Zheng
---------------------------------------
Jeff Yenyou Zheng, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. John T. BOND, Respondent.

No. 41088.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 12, 1971.

Patrick A. Podsaid, Coral Gables, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

William D. Fabing, Miami, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review a petition by John T. Bond that he be allowed to resign from The Florida Bar for a period of not less than three years. The Florida Bar through counsel has concluded that the requested resignation will not adversely affect the public interest, purity of the courts, will not hinder the administration of justice, nor damage public confidence in the legal profession. It appears from the record that restitution has been made of moneys, possession of which by Respondent Bond was the subject of complaints to The Bar.

It is the judgment of the Court that Respondent be permitted to resign from the practice of law and membership in The Bar for three years, and thereafter until he shall have demonstrated to The Bar fitness to resume practice.

Costs of these proceedings shall be taxed against Respondent.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### John Henry BATTLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1202.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 13, 1978.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marsha G. Madorsky and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DOWNEY, Chief Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

In his petition for rehearing the appellee has pointed out that in the recent case of *State v. Abreau,*363 So.2d 1063 (1978) by the Supreme Court of Florida, the court held that the rule set forth in *DeLaine v. State,*262 So.2d 655 (Fla.1977), is still the law of Florida. Having reconsidered our opinion filed June 7, 1978, in the light of *State v. Abreau,*supra, the appellee’s petition for rehearing is granted, our opinion filed June 7, 1978, is withdrawn and the judgment and sentence appealed from is affirmed.

LETTS and MOORE, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (No. 333-13095 and No. 333-82021) on Form S-8 and Form S-3/A,
respectively, of Kyzen Corporation of our report dated February 6, 2004, with
respect to the balance sheet of Kyzen Corporation as of December 31, 2003, and
the related statements of income, shareholders' equity and comprehensive income,
and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31,
2003 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Kyzen Corporation.

/s/  KPMG LLP

Nashville, Tennessee

March 30, 2004
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                (Before Payment of Capital or Issuance of Stock)


                        CORPORATE ADVISORY SERVICE, INC.
                        -------------------------------
                              Name of Incorporator


                                  certify that


1.   He contributes two-thirds of the original incorporators BRIDGE CAPITAL.COM,
                                                             -------------------
     INC.  a  Nevada  Corporation.
     ---

2.   The original Articles were filed in the Office of the Secretary of State on
     2/10/99.
     --------

3.   As  of  the  date of this certificate, no stock of the corporation has been
     issued.

     They hereby adopt the following amendments to the Articles of Incorporation
     of  the  corporation:

Article  FIRST  is  amended  to  read  as  follows:
         -----

         FIRST.  The  name  of  the  corporation  is:
         -----

                        DENALI CONCRETE MANAGEMENT, INC.






                                               ---------------------------------
                                                    Sara A. Zaro, Vice-President