alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FRANK JULIO VICARY, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-195 Erie

v. )

)

WARDEN JAMES VESHECCO, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on June 22, 2005, 

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 5], filed on

August 1, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be dismissed as moot and that

a certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the

date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and

on Respondent. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and

documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following

order is entered:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DISMISSED as moot and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 5] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on August 1, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00195-SJM-SPB Document 6 Filed 08/22/06 Page 1 of 1
sUAS CHECKLIST

Before power up check

Arms - extended and/or secured, ensuring no loose or missing screws, cracks, or damage.

Component inspection - Ensure all wires and components are connected and secured away 

from props. Exterior components should be securely attached, vibration dampeners as not torn, 

and wires are secured to frame.

GPS Antenna - Locked in upright position and arrow pointed to the front of craft.

Prop check - ensure all props are securely attached and no damage.

Battery check - check battery voltage and note battery rating for estimated flight duration

Video camera check - ensure camera has memory card install, battery installed, power up 

camera, format memory card if desired, verify desire shooting mode is selected, ensure camera 

is installed on gimbal and attachments are secure.

Radio Check

Radio configured - ensure all radio switches are in their proper positions

Course mode: Off

GPS mode: on

Yaw: 100%

Radio Power - power on radio and verify radio battery voltage is sufficient for flight.

Telemetry info and video downlink

Monitor - mounted to tripod or other secure point accessible for viewing

Battery - confirm battery voltage

Receiver - verify antenna attached and orientated correctly 

plug in battery

power on monitor

Page 1 of 3
sUAS CHECKLIST

Power Up

Launch area - area for take-off should, level, be free of debris, and provide 20 feet of clearance 

of obstacles and personnel

Camera - power camera on

Radio - securely in the hands of VO

Install sUAS Battery 

Connect battery connecter to main power wires

ensure power up tones are heard

gimbal should become alive and center

LED indicator should flash red

Downlink - ensure telemetry in viewable on monitor

Altitude should read zero

GPS satellites should show 6 or more

LED on sUAS should go from yellow to green flashes

Camera - if recording is to be done, start recording prior to starting props

Prop Start

Telemetry - very flight data, altitude, battery voltage, GPS signals

Clear - Clear area and verbally announce “Clear”

Start props - initiate prop start command on radio

Launch

Motors - listen for abnormal sounds from motors

Throttle - apply throttle for liftoff 

climb to 10-20 feet AGL

Control check - perform control input check

climb/descend

left/right

forward/aft

yaw left/right

camera gimbal movement

Page 2 of 3
sUAS CHECKLIST

Flight

Telemetry - While maintaining visual of the sUAS cross check flight data

Altitude, GPS signal, lateral distance

Landing

bBring sUAS over the intended landing zone

Descent - visual clear and verbalize “Landing” in the landing zone 

Land - Landing should be slow and soft

Initiate prop shutdown

Power - disconnect Battery

All clear - verbalize the “All Clear”

Camera - stop recording and power off

Post Flight

Power - ensure battery is disconnected

Battery - remove battery

Props - check props for damage

components - check wires, and frame of any in flight damage.

Radio - power off radio

Telemetry - disconnect power to monitor

Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement No. 333-149313 on Form F-3 of our report dated June 29, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements of YPF SOCIEDAD ANONIMA (YPF), which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph stating that the accounting principles generally accepted in Argentina vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, that the information relating to the
nature and effect of such differences is presented in Notes 13, 14, and 15 to the consolidated financial statements of YPF, and of our report dated June 29, 2009, relating to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of YPF for the year ended December 31, 2008.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Buenos Aires, Argentina
|June 29, 2009          
|                       
|Deloitte & Co. S.R.L.  
|                       
|/s/ Ricardo C. Ruiz    
|Ricardo C. Ruiz        
|Partner
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TransDigm Holding
Company (the Company) for the thirteen weeks ended December 27, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Nicholas Howley, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the
Company for the periods indicated.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 3, 2004



/s/ W. Nicholas HowleyName:

W. Nicholas HowleyTitle:

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)




37
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EDWARD J. NICHOLAS, 

Plaintiff,

v.

PATRICIA THOMPSON, et al., 

 Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civ. A. No. 06-118 Erie

District Judge McLaughlin 

Magistrate Judge Baxter

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I. RECOMMENDATION

It is respectfully recommended that the Petitioner’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

[Document # 1] be denied and the case dismissed without prejudice.

II. REPORT

When submitting a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, the Plaintiff is required to submit

“an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such prisoner possesses that the person is unable

to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). In addition to the aforementioned affidavit, Plaintiff is further required to “submit a certified copy of the trust fund account

statement(orinstitutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding

the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison

at which the prisoner is or was confined.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).

In this case, Plaintiff has failed to submit a copy of his institutional account statement,

certified or otherwise. Because Plaintiff has failed to comply with the statutory prerequisites for

proceeding In Forma Pauperis, Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis should be denied

and the case dismissed without prejudice.

Case 1:06-cv-00118-SJM-SPB Document 6 Filed 05/26/06 Page 1 of 2
2

III. CONCLUSION

For the reasons set forth above, it is respectfully recommended that the Petitioner’s Motion

to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Document # 1] be denied and the case dismissed without prejudice.

In accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule

72.1.4(B) of the Local Rules for Magistrates, the parties are allowed ten (10) days from the date of

service to file objections to this report and recommendation. Any party opposing the objections

shall have seven (7) days from the date of service of objections to respond thereto. Failure to file

timely objections may constitute a waiver of any appellate rights.

S/Susan Paradise Baxter 

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge

Dated: May 23, 2006

cc: The Honorable Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

Case 1:06-cv-00118-SJM-SPB Document 6 Filed 05/26/06 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

I, James P. Tolley, the principal accounting officer of Agemark Corporation (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

                  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Registrant, to
                  which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the
                  "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m);
                  and

                  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Registrant.

Dated: February  17, 2004

/s/ JAMES P. TOLLEY
-------------------
James P. Tolley
Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.

                                      -14-
#### C. O. BARNARD & SON CONSTRUCTION CO., Inc., Appellant, v. DAVID M. WOOLIN & SON, INC., B. E. Hensley, d/b/a Hensley Concreform Co., Inc., Appellees.

No. 69-935.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 4, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1595** 

JAMES ARTHUR SMITH , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. ANTHEM, INC. , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 2:15

- cv - 00197

- AWA

- LRL )

Submitted : August 18, 2016 Decided: August 22, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. James Arthur Smith, Appellant Pro Se. David Edward Constine, III, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Arthur Smith appeal s the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Anthem, Inc ., on Smith’s discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 ( 2012 ) , and the Americans with Disabilities
Ac t, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101

- 12300 (2012)
. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Smith’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s dispositive rulings , Smith ha s forfeited appellate review of the district court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc. , 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004); s ee also Edwards v. City of Goldsboro , 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999) (failure to raise is sue in opening brief constitutes abandonment of that issue). Accordingly, we deny Smith’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment
. See Smith v. Anthem, Inc. , No. 2:15

- cv - 00197

- AWA

- LRL (E.D. Va. May 20, 2016). We dispense with oral a rgument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1    CERTIFICATIONS  I, Bruce E. Schreiner, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report of the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2009 of Sense Technologies, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statement, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15e)) for the small business issuer and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made know to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the annual report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.  5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers control over financial reporting.   October 20, 2009


|                                            | 
|------------------------------------------- | 
|S/ BRUCE E. SCHREINER                       | 
|Bruce E. Schreiner, Chief Executive Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3068 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3068

 To require each enterprise to include on the Uniform Residential Loan 
   Application a disclaimer to increase awareness of the direct and 
 guaranteed home loan programs of the Department of Veterans Affairs, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 18, 2023

   Mr. Braun (for himself, Mr. Brown, Ms. Rosen, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. 
   Sinema, Mr. Budd, Mr. Sanders, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. 
Tillis, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Warnock, Mr. Reed, Mr. King, and Mr. 
Welch) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
        to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require each enterprise to include on the Uniform Residential Loan 
   Application a disclaimer to increase awareness of the direct and 
 guaranteed home loan programs of the Department of Veterans Affairs, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA Home Loan Awareness Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. MILITARY SERVICE QUESTION.

    (a) In General.--Subpart A of part 2 of the Federal Housing 
Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4541 
et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 1329. UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL LOAN APPLICATION.

    ``Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this 
section, the Director shall, by regulation or order, require each 
enterprise to include a disclaimer below the military service question 
on the form known as the Uniform Residential Loan Application stating, 
`If yes, you may qualify for a VA Home Loan. Consult your lender 
regarding eligibility.'.''.
    (b) GAO Study.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 
shall conduct a study and submit to Congress a report on whether not 
less than 80 percent of lenders using the Uniform Residential Loan 
Application have included on that form the disclaimer required under 
section 1329 of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and 
Soundness Act of 1992, as added by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Frank VOELKER, III, et al.

No. 61037.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

In re: Frank Voelker, III applying for writs of review, certiorari and stay order.

*704Granted. (Parish of Webster).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Monty M. Wyche, Judge of the 26th Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Webster, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 16th day of December, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this court, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
#### Charles Edward CALHOUN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-195.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

July 31, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 26,1969.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James McGuirk, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Microfield Group, Inc. (the
"Company") for the twelve months ended December 29, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I,
the principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that:





The
Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





The
information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of this 28th day of March
2008.








/s/
      RANDALL R.
      REEDRandall
      R. ReedChief
      Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SHAKEER REESE, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-281 Erie

v. )

)

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF ) 

PROBATION AND PAROLE, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2006, and upon review, nunc pro tunc, of

Petitioner’s untimely filed objections [Doc. No. 21] to Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise

Baxter’s report and recommendation [Doc. No. 18] filed November 13, 2006 

recommending that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habaes Corpus be dismissed and

that a certificate of appealability be denied, the following order is entered:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

DISMISSED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 18] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on November 13, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. 

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00281-SJM-SPB Document 22 Filed 12/08/06 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection  with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Elite Information Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) for the three month period ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the “Report”),  I, Li Kin Shing, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:  July 15, 2010
By
/s/ Li Kin ShingLi Kin ShingPresident, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer