UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Criminal No. 12-65 (CKK) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

(January 13, 2013) 

Defendant Paul David Hite is charged by Superseding Indictment with two counts of 

attempted coercion and enticement of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). The 

Government alleges that the Defendant engaged in a series of online chats and telephone 

conversations with an undercover police detective posing as an adult and arranged to engage in 

illicit sexual activity with a fictitious three year-old boy and twelve year-old girl. Presently 

before the Court is the Government’s [26] Motion in Limine to Introduce Evidence Pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). The Government seeks to admit a variety of evidence 

recovered from a laptop seized from the Defendant’s residence comprised primarily of (1) 

evidence of the Defendant allegedly accessing child pornography; and (2) evidence of the 

Defendant’s online chats and email exchanges with other adults discussing illicit sexual activity 

with minors. Upon consideration of the pleadings,1

 the relevant legal authorities, and the record 

as a whole—including an in camera review of the proposed photographic evidence—the Court 

finds that certain redacted evidence proffered by the Government meets the standard for 

 1

 Gov’t Mot., ECF No. [26]; Def.’s Opp’n, ECF No. [30]; Gov’t Reply, ECF No. [32]. 

The Defendant’s [34] Motion for Leave to File a Surreply is GRANTED. The Court considered 

the Defendant’s Surreply in resolving the Government’s motion. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 v. 

PAUL DAVID HITE, 

 Defendant. 
2 

admissibility under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). The Court will require the Government to 

redact certain portions of various proposed exhibits to exclude irrelevant and/or unduly 

prejudicial evidence that substantially outweighs its probative value. The probative value of the 

redacted evidence which the Court finds admissible is not substantially outweighed by the 

danger of undue prejudice under Federal Rule of Evidence 403. Accordingly, the Government’s 

Motion in Limine to Introduce Evidence Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) is 

GRANTED IN PART as set forth below. 

The Court shall provide the Defendant an opportunity to review and object to the 

proposed images and redacted chats with other individuals that the Government seeks to have 

admitted, but that the Defendant has not had an opportunity to review in their current form prior 

to filing his opposition to the Government’s motion. 

I. BACKGROUND 

 The Court set forth the factual history leading to the Defendant’s arrest at length in prior 

opinions, and those discussions are incorporated by reference herein. 6/30/12 Mem. Opin. at 1-

13; 10/9/12 Mem. Opin. at 2-4. The Court will reference certain aspects of the Defendant’s 

discussions with the undercover detective known to the Defendant as “JP,” as necessary, and 

assumes the parties are familiar with the conversations.2

II. LEGAL STANDARD 

Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) provides that “[e]vidence of a crime, wrong, or other 

acts is not admissible to prove a person’s character in or to show that on a particular occasion the 

person acted in accordance with the character,” but “may be admissible for another purpose,” 

 2

 The chats between the Defendant and “JP” are reproduced in their entirety in Docket 

Number [11-1]. 
3 

including proving “motive, opportunity, intent, . . . [or] absence of mistake.” Fed. R. Evid. 

404(b)(1), (2). The rule is one of “inclusion rather than exclusion. Although the first sentence of 

Rule 404(b) is framed restrictively, the rule itself is quite permissive, prohibiting the admission 

of other crimes evidence in but one circumstance—for the purpose of proving that a person's 

actions conformed to his character.” United States v. Bowie, 232 F.3d 923, 929-30 (D.C. Cir. 

2000) (internal quotations omitted). 

In addressing trial court determinations on the admissibility of bad acts evidence 

under the Federal Rules of Evidence, this circuit has employed a two-step mode 

of analysis. Under the first step, which addresses Rule 404(b), “[the court] must 

determine whether the evidence is relevant to a material issue other than 

character. If so, [the court] proceeds to the second inquiry,” under Federal Rule 

of Evidence 403, “whether the probative value is substantially outweighed by the 

prejudice.” 

United States v. Burch, 156 F.3d 1315, 1323 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting United States v. Mitchell, 

49 F.3d 769, 775 (D.C. Cir. 1995)). 

III. DISCUSSION 

 The Government seeks to introduce five categories of evidence pursuant to Rule 404(b): 

(1) Twenty-four images of child pornography in thumbnail view and larger views of 

five of the twenty-four images. The images are a sample of 421 image and video 

files found in a “thumbcache” database file on the Defendant’s laptop, Gov’t Mot. 

at 12, Gov’t Notice, ECF No. [49]; 

(2) A printout of forensic analysis of the Internet Explorer web browsing history and 

recently accessed files indicating that on certain dates at certain times, the laptop 

user accessed image and media files with names “consistent with child 

pornography,” see Gov’t Reply Ex. B (browser history); Gov’t Reply Ex. C 

(recently accessed files); 

(3) Yahoo Instant Messenger chats between the Defendant and four separate 

individuals (Yahoo User1, Yahoo User2, Yahoo User3, and Yahoo User4) on 

various dates since June 2011, see Gov’t Reply Ex. D; 

(4) Emails obtained from the Defendant’s Yahoo email address indicating the 

Defendant established a Skype account, see Gov’t Reply Ex. E; and 
4 

(5) Three emails exchanged by the Defendant and another individual (Yahoo User5), 

including three images attached to the emails showing an adult male and a two- to 

three-year old boy. 

Gov’t Mot. at 11-17. During discovery, the Government provided the Defendant all of the 

evidence at issue and provided defense counsel the opportunity to review the photographic 

evidence. The Government initially offered only a description of the precise evidence it sought 

to have admitted, but did not provide the proposed non-photographic evidence until its Reply 

brief. The Defendant filed a Surreply addressing the thumbcache evidence, but did not include 

any objections to the other proposed exhibits. 

The Government contends that this evidence is “highly relevant to prove the defendant’s 

intent, knowledge, plan, and absence of mistake in committing the charged offense.” Id. at 18. 

The Defendant argues that the evidence proffered by the Government is irrelevant to the issue of 

the Defendant’s intent to entice or coerce the minors at issue in the Superseding Indictment, but 

does not address the admissibility of the evidence as probative of his knowledge or absence of 

mistake. The Court finds the proposed Rule 404(b) evidence is probative of the Defendant’s 

intent in this case. The Court further agrees with the Government’s analysis—which the 

Defendant does not dispute—that the evidence is generally relevant to the Defendant’s 

knowledge and absence of mistake. However, the evidence at issue in the Government’s motion 

is not probative of a “plan” under Rule 404(b). The Government does not identify a common 

scheme or plan, or describe how the proposed Rule 404(b) evidence is probative of that plan. 

See United States v. Burkley, 591 F.2d 903, 920 (D.C. Cir. 1978) (noting plan evidence is 

admissible under Rule 404(b) “to show the existence of a common scheme or plan embracing the 

commission of two or more crimes so related to each other that proof of the one tends to 

establish the other”) (citation omitted). Accordingly, for the reasons explained below, the Court 
5 

finds the proposed evidence is probative of the Defendant’s intent, knowledge, and absence of 

mistake. 

As reflected in the motions practice thus far in the case, the defense will likely contend at 

trial that the Defendant lacked the intent to coerce the fictitious minors, and that his 

conversations with the detective were merely “fantasies.” The Defendant generally argues that 

the proposed 404(b) evidence is inadmissible because it does not “constitute other instances of 

using an instrumentality of interstate commerce to persuade, induce, coerce or entice a minor, the 

conduct charged in the superseding indictment.” Opp’n at 6. Contrary to the Defendant’s 

assertion, a prior bad act does not have to involve the exact same intent of the charged offense in 

order to be relevant. United States v. Long, 328 F.3d 655, 661 (D.C. Cir. 2003). “Evidence of a 

similar act must meet a threshold level of similarity in order to be admissible to prove intent,” 

but that evidence is not required to have the “exact congruence” the Defendant articulates. Id. 

“[T]he admissible bad acts evidence need not show incidents identical to the events charged, so 

long as they are closely related to the offense, and are probative of intent rather than mere 

propensity.” Id. (citation omitted). 

 In Long, the D.C. Circuit rejected the precise argument the Defendant makes here: that 

“[e]xtrinsic act evidence is admissible under the intent theory . . . only if the intent underlying the 

extrinsic act is the same illegal intent required for the charged act.” 328 F.3d at 661. Long was 

charged with interstate transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity 

and possession of photographs of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct. Id. at 658. 

Pursuant to Rule 404(b), the Court admitted testimony of two individuals (“FM” and “AG”) who 

had sexual contact with Long while they were between the ages of sixteen and nineteen as 

relevant to, among other things, Long’s intent. Id. at 659. On appeal, Long argued that the 
6 

testimony should have been excluded because it was not relevant to the question of his intent to 

engage in unlawful sexual activity with minors. Id. at 661. The D.C. Circuit rejected this 

argument, finding that although Long’s sexual contact with FM and AG was lawful, the fact that 

he admittedly had sexual contact with teenagers was probative of his intent to engage in unlawful 

sexual activity with minors at issue in the case. Id. at 662. 

 The Defendant attempts to distinguish Long on the grounds that the intent requirement 

under the applicable statute in Long—the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity with a 

minor—is distinct from the intent relevant in this case—the Defendant’s intent to entice or 

coerce a minor to engage in criminal sexual activity. Compare 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) with 18 

U.S.C. § 2422(b). Certainly, the mens rea the Government must prove in order to convict a 

defendant under the relevant statutory provisions in Long and in this case are distinct. However, 

the underlying principle in Long, reflected in jurisprudence from numerous other Circuits 

discussed infra, is that evidence of a defendant’s sexual attraction to children (or teenagers) is 

probative of the specific intent element of criminal statutes involving sexual activity with minors. 

See e.g., United States v. Chambers, 642 F.3d 588, 595 (7th Cir. 2011) (“Prior instances of 

sexual misconduct with a child victim may establish a defendant’s sexual interest in children and 

thereby serve as evidence of the defendant’s motive to commit a charged offense involving the 

sexual exploitation of children.”) (citations omitted). Thus, as a general principle, the Rule 

404(b) evidence proffered by the Government is probative of the Defendant’s sexual attraction to 

children, and as a result, is probative of his intent to entice or coerce the fictitious minors in this 

case. 

 The Defendant also argues that “expert testimony rebuts the bald conclusory intuitive 

assertion the Government makes in its Motion that the possession of child pornography or other 
7 

manifestations of interest in sex with minors evidences an intent to persuade, induce, coerce or 

entice a minor to engage in sex.” Def.’s Opp’n at 11. In order to be relevant, the Government’s 

proposed Rule 404(b) evidence does not have to prove the Defendant’s intent, it need only make 

it more probable that the Defendant possessed the requisite intent. Fed. R. Evid. 401(a). 

Whether or not the Defendant is sexually attracted to children, though not necessarily 

dispositive, is relevant to the broader question of whether, based on all of the evidence presented 

to the jury, the Defendant intended to entice or coerce the fictitious minors to engage in illicit 

sexual activity. In fact, at least five Circuits have found the relevance of evidence of a 

defendant’s sexual attraction to children in section 2422(b) prosecutions to be so obvious as to 

not warrant discussion. United States v. Lewis, 318 F. App’x 1, 2 (D.C. Cir. 2009); accord

United States v. Cooke, 675 F.3d 1153, 1157 (8th Cir. 2012); United States v. Wolford, 386 F. 

App’x 479, 484 (5th Cir. 2010); United States v. Godwin, 399 F. App’x 484, 489-90 (11th Cir. 

2010). The Defendant may ultimately convince the jury that despite evidence indicating a sexual 

attraction to children, he did not intend to entice the minors in question. That is a factual 

question for the jury to consider, not a question of admissibility of the Government’s proposed 

evidence. With the threshold relevance of this general type of evidence established, the Court 

will turn to the specific evidence the Government seeks to admit. 

A. Thumbcache images 

A forensic analysis of the Defendant’s laptop discovered a “thumbcache” database file on 

the laptop containing thumbnail images from still photographs, images or video files containing 

child pornography. The database contained 421 thumbnail images, 408 of which were created, 

last modified, and last accessed on October 21, 2009. The remaining thirteen images were 

created, last modified, and last accessed between February 8 and February 10, 2012. The 
8 

Government indicated its expert will testify that the thumbnail images were created when an 

external hard drive containing the explicit images was connected to the computer and the images 

were opened. Gov’t Reply at 2-3; Gov’t Mot., Ex. A (Computer Forensic Exam. Report) at 1. 

The Government does not contend that the images were ever saved to the laptop, or that the 

images were accessible on the laptop at the time it was seized from the Defendant’s home. Id. 

The Defendant asserts that his expert will testify that the thumbcache file was automatically 

created by the operating system when the external drive containing the explicit images was 

connected to the computer. Def.’s Surreply at 4 & n.1. 

As a threshold matter, as explained in detail above, the Defendant’s access to child 

pornography is relevant to the Defendant’s intent in this case insofar as it is probative of his 

sexual attraction to children. United States v. Lewis, 318 F. App’x 1, 2 (D.C. Cir. 2009); see also 

United States v. Levinson, No. 11-13268, 2013 WL 49718 (11th Cir. Jan. 4, 2013). The parties 

do not dispute that thumbnail images depict child pornography. Nor do the parties dispute that 

the thumbcache database was created when an external drive containing child pornography was 

connected to the laptop. The only dispute between the parties is whether the Defendant opened 

the explicit images while the external drive was connected to the laptop. 

The Defendant argues that the Court should conduct a hearing in order to resolve the 

dispute between the parties’ respective experts as to how the thumbcache database was created. 

The Defendant did not file a Daubert motion or otherwise challenge the admissibility of the 

Government’s expert testimony concerning the forensic analysis of the Defendant’s laptop. See

Gov’t Notice of Expert Testimony, ECF No. [27]. The Government must introduce evidence 

sufficient from which a reasonable jury could find by a preponderance of the evidence that the 

defendant committed the other bad act. United States v. Burwell, 642 F.3d 1062, 1066 (D.C. Cir. 
9 

2011); Long, 328 F.3d 655. The Court is not required to “reach[] a preliminary determination 

[prior to trial] as to whether the government had presented sufficient evidence to support a 

finding that defendants committed the uncharged acts.” Id. Moreover, from the present record, 

the Government has proffered sufficient evidence to allow a reasonable jury to conclude the 

Defendant accessed the explicit images. If the jury credits the Government expert’s testimony, 

there will be sufficient evidence to support a finding by the jury that the Defendant accessed the 

images. Even if the jury were to credit the Defendant’s expert, or credit each expert in part, there 

would still be sufficient evidence for the jury to conclude by a preponderance of the evidence 

that the Defendant had access to certain child pornography. 

Pursuant to the Court’s January 10, 2013 Minute Order, on January 11, 2013, the 

Government brought to Chambers the precise exhibits from the thumbcache database it seeks to 

admit: one 8 1⁄2 by 11 inch piece of paper containing twenty-four thumbnail images, and five 8 1⁄2 

by 11 pieces of paper, each containing an enlarged3

 version of one of the thumbnail images. All 

of the photos were in color. The Government indicated that the twenty-four images represented 

a sample of the 421 thumnail images in the thumbcache database, selected based on the 

similarity of the image to the type of sexual conduct the Defendant discussed with “JP.” The 

five enlarged images were selected given their similarity to what the Defendant and JP had 

discussed doing with the three year-old boy and the twelve year-old girl. The Government did 

not indicate whether the images presented to the Court were created in October 2009 or February 

2012. 

The Court finds these images are probative evidence of the Defendant’s intent and 

 3

 The Court uses the term “enlarged” to indicate the images are larger than the bookmark 

images. The Court has no information regarding the size of original images stored on the 

external hard drive. 
10 

absence of mistake in this case, and are admissible as other crimes evidence under Rule 404(b). 

Although the images created and accessed in February 2012 are more highly probative to the 

Defendant’s intent in conversing with JP during that same time frame, the images created and 

accessed in October 2009 are still probative of the Defendant’s intent. Accordingly, the 

Government shall create a revised exhibit of not more than 24 thumbnail images and not more 

than 5 enlarged images.4 The revised exhibit should include images accessed in 2012 to the 

extent they are representative of the type of sexual conduct the Defendant discussed with JP. 

Once the Defendant has had an opportunity to review the revised exhibits and lodge objections 

with the Court, the Court shall conduct a second in camera review to determine the admissibility 

of the images individually and as a whole under Rule 403. 

B. Internet Browser History and Recently Accessed Files 

The Defendant objects to the second and third types of evidence—browser history and 

list of recently accessed files on his laptop—on the grounds the Government offers no evidence 

as to the content of the files. The Defendant does not dispute that certain file names that appear 

in the proposed exhibits are indicative of child pornography. Nor does the Defendant claim that 

some other user accessed the files on the laptop. The Government proffered sufficient evidence 

from which the jury could conclude that the Defendant accessed child pornography. Long, 328 

F.3d at 660 (noting evidence of a defendant’s other bad acts must be “sufficient to support a jury 

finding that the defendant committed the other crime or act”). The fact that the Government has 

not produced the actual images or files accessed on the laptop may go to the weight of the 

evidence, but does not bar its admission. See United States v. Godwin, 399 F. App’x 484, 489 

 4

 The Court has not yet determined that a total of twenty-four thumbnail images and/or 

five enlarged images are necessarily admissible. 
11 

(11th Cir. 2010) (upholding admission of the statement by the Defendant to the police following 

his arrest that he had engaged in “online sex talk” with other minor girls as relevant to 

“Godwin’s intent to induce [the minor] to engage in illegal sexual activity”). 

 1. Internet Browser History 

The proposed evidence of the Defendant’s browser history, Exhibit B to the 

Government’s Reply, is a report generated from forensic software used to analyze the web 

browser history on the Defendant’s laptop. The report includes the type of file, last visited date, 

user, number of hits, and the uniform resource locator (“URL”) for the relevant file. Seventy 

three URLs are listed in the report, including five jpeg files with URLs indicative of child 

pornography, including in relevant part “Boys-Teen%20Boy%20Fucking%20Preteen” (reported 

twice), “boyman69,” “boynbaby,” and “boydadrape.” One additional URL is indicative of 

pornography generally (“fuckbrothers2”). Twenty-two of the non-explicit URLs were last 

accessed on January 1, 2011 between 10:31 PM and 10:32 PM. Twenty-eight of the URLs, 

including four of the child pornography-related URLs, were last visited on January 2, 2011 

between 2:04 AM and 2:44 AM. The remaining twenty-three URLs, including the “boydadrape” 

URL, were last visited on January 20, 2011 between 9:34 PM and 9:35 PM. 

The five file names indicative of child pornography are appropriate Rule 404(b) evidence 

that is probative of the Defendant’s intent, knowledge, and absence of mistake in communicating 

with JP regarding the two fictitious minors, in particular the three year-old boy. The report 

indicates each jpeg was last accessed in January 2011, which is sufficiently close in time to the 

events at issue—which took place in February 2012—to make the evidence probative of the 

Defendant’s intent with respect to the charges in this case. See United States v. Cooke, 675 F.3d 

1153, 1157 (8th Cir. 2012) (holding sexually explicit emails exchanged fourteen months before 
12 

the charged offense were “not too remote in time” to be probative of the defendant’s intent to 

entice or coerce a minor to engage in illicit sexual activity). 

Upon review of each of the explicit URLs and the exhibit as a whole, the Court finds the 

probative value of the five URLs indicative of child pornography is not substantially outweighed 

by the risk of undue prejudice. The URLs reflect sexual activity involving minor children, which 

is highly probative of the Defendant’s intent. There is some risk of prejudice given the explicit 

nature of the URLs, but the potential prejudice is extremely limited, for two reasons. First, the 

risk of unfair prejudice is minimized by the “already-graphic nature of the case.” Wolford, 386 

F. App’x at 484. Second, the explicit images are not being shown to the jury. Thus the Court 

shall admit a list of the five URLs indicative of child pornography pursuant to Rule 404(b).5

 2. Recently Accessed Files 

 The Government also seeks to introduce a report listing the most recently accessed files 

on the Defendant’s laptop. Gov’t Reply Ex. C. The list includes in relevant part the names of 

fifty-six “.lnk” files and the date each file was last modified. Eleven of the file names are 

indicative of child pornography, including “10yroldsckcock,” “daddy sucks boya,” and 

“kid+cumming[1].” Id. at 1. Eight of the explicitly named files have modification dates of July 

25, 2010, one file was last modified on January 17, 2011, and two files have modification dates 

of March 5, 2011. Id. at 1-2. Several other file names imply pornographic content, but it is 

unclear whether the files include child pornography, for example “13facerape,” and 

“Beto_Gets_Fucked.” Id. 

 The eleven file names indicative of child pornography are appropriate Rule 404(b) 

 5

 If the Defendant believes it is important, the Court will admit the entire exhibit attached 

to the Government’s Reply. 
13 

evidence that is probative of the Defendant’s intent, knowledge, and absence of mistake in 

communicating with JP regarding the two fictitious minors, in particular the three year-old boy. 

The Court shall admit only the three names indicative of child pornography with modification 

dates after January 1, 2011: 10yroldsckcock,” (last modified January 17, 2011) “daddy sucks 

boya,” (last modified March 5, 2011) and “zadoom pedo rizmastar kdv rbv (rizmastar hots) 

preteen boys hard sex 7yo 8yo 9yo 10yo boy (03.2005new) 028,” (last modified March 5, 2011). 

The potential for unfair prejudice is limited: the Court is admitting only three images and the 

actual images will not be admitted or shown to the jury. On this basis, the Court finds the risk of 

undue prejudice does not substantially outweigh the probative value of the file names.6

C. Transcripts of Other Online Chats 

The Government also seeks to admit transcripts of separate online chats between the 

Defendant and four different individuals. The Defendant objects to the admission of transcripts 

solely on the basis of relevance: the Defendant argues that since none of the chats were with 

minors, they are not probative of his intent to entice or coerce the minors in this case. The Court 

has twice rejected this argument. 6/30/12 Mem. Opin.; 10/9/12 Mem. Opin. Moreover, evidence 

the Defendant engaged in explicit discussions of sexual contact with minors, regardless of 

whether or not he followed through with plans to meet in person, is probative of his intent to 

entice or coerce the minors to engage in illicit sexual activity. E.g., United States v. Levinson, 

No. 11-13268, 2013 WL 49718, at *3 (11th Cir. Jan. 4, 2013); United States v. Cooke, 675 F.3d 

1153, 1157 (8th Cir. 2012) (upholding admission of sexually explicit emails exchanged with a 

sixteen year-old girl fourteen months before the conduct at issue); United States v. McDarrah, 

 6

 If the Defendant believes it is important, the Court will admit all file names dated after 

January 1, 2011. 
14 

351 F. App’x 558, 563 (2d Cir. 2009) (affirming introduction of defendant’s email responses to 

craigslist ads indicating his interest in sex with girls under the age of eighteen as evidence 

corroborating his intent to engage in actual sexual conduct with minor at issue in the case); see 

also United States v. Knowles, 655 F.3d 647 657-58 (7th Cir. 2011) (holding chat transcripts in 

which the defendant expressed an interest in having sex with minors and asked to meet with the 

minors were relevant Rule 404(b) evidence even absent proof the defendant actually attempted to 

meet with the minors). The Court reviewed each conversation line-by-line in order to evaluate 

the probative value and potential prejudice of the discussions individually, and as a whole. The 

Court shall admit portions of conversations with all four individuals as set forth below. 

1. Yahoo User1: “Riley” 

Yahoo User1 used a screen name abbreviated to “Riley,” and chatted with the Defendant 

on June 24, 2011. Ex. D at 6-7. During the chat, riley describes seeing his 11 year-old nephew 

naked in the bathroom and recording him undressing, to which the Defendant replies 

“MMMMM,” “fuckin HOT,” and “sexy as hell?” Id. at 6. Riley then describes wanting to have 

sexual contact with the boy, and “need[ing] to get a roofie to knock him out to fuck him.” Id. 

The Defendant suggests “Benadryl, anti-histamine, [or] cold-medicine,” but Riley indicated he 

did not have any. 

Having reviewed each line of the chat between Riley and the Defendant, the Court finds 

the risk of unfair prejudice does not substantially outweigh the probative value of the 

conversation. The Defendant’s chat with Riley is relevant evidence of his intent, knowledge, and 

absence of mistake in that it is probative of his sexual attraction to young children, and reflects 

the fact that Defendant and Riley had previous conversations about similar topics. The chat is 

also probative of the Defendant’s intent with JP because in both cases the Defendant suggests 
15 

using Benadryl to sedate the child before engaging in sexual activity. The conversation took 

place approximately six months before the events in this case, which is sufficiently close in time 

to make the conversation probative of the Defendant’s intent when conversing with JP. The 

graphic nature of the chat may cause some prejudice, but the chat is brief and the risk of unfair 

prejudice does not substantially outweigh the immense probative value. Accordingly, the 

Defendant’s chat with Riley is admissible under Rules 404(b) and 403.7 

2. Yahoo User2: “Justin” 

Yahoo User2 used a screen name abbreviated to “Justin,” and chatted with the Defendant 

extensively during the evening of January 6 and early morning of January 7, 2012. Ex. D. at 7-

23. The transcript implies that the Defendant asked Justin to prove that he was not a police 

officer, so the parties saw each other over a web cam. Id. at 10 (“did not realize was going to be 

on cam”). The discussion further implies that Justin is significantly younger than the Defendant, 

though Justin’s age is never explicitly stated in the chat log produced to the Court. For example, 

at one point in the conversation Justin asks the Defendant “did you see my ass?” and “you like 

younger ass?” The Defendant replies “oh yeah---on BOTH accounts.” Id. at 14. In reference to 

their web cam session, Justin later says “im just a lil boi and you saw it and no cops.” Id. at 15. 

The parties also briefly discuss a thirteen year-old girl that purportedly lives next to Justin. 

Certain aspects of the conversation with Justin are particularly probative of the 

Defendant’s intent, knowledge, and absence of mistake. The Defendant expresses an interest in 

sexual activity with a thirteen year-old girl, similar to the twelve year-old girl at issue in Count 

Two of the Superseding Indictment. The Defendant asking Justin to participate in a web cam 

 7

 The Court is not requiring the Government to redact any portion of the Defendant’s 

chat with Riley, but for the sake of completeness, the Court reproduced the chat with Riley in the 

Appendix. 
16 

session reflects a similar pattern to what the Defendant proposed to JP: having JP engage in a 

web cam session before the Defendant traveled to the District of Columbia. To be fair, portions 

of the chat are potentially prejudicial: Justin’s age is not entirely clear, and most of the chat is 

comprised of Justin proposing he and Defendant engage in sexual conduct, or asking the 

Defendant if he wants to watch Justin perform certain sexual acts. The Court redacted the most 

prejudicial and least probative portions of the chat, as set forth in the Appendix to this 

Memorandum. The probative value of the redacted chat with Justin is not substantially 

outweighed by the risk of undue prejudice, and is therefore admissible. 

3. Yahoo User3: “Aussie” 

Yahoo User3 used a screen name abbreviated to “Aussie,” and chatted with the 

Defendant at various points on January 29, January 30, February 1, and February 9, 2012. Ex. D 

at 24-29, 36-41, & 74-75. The parties primarily discussed Aussie’s sexual activity with three 

children: his seventeen month-old nephew, his four year-old niece, and his seven year-old 

nephew. E.g., id. at 24. The Defendant and Aussie also discussed Aussie having sexual contact 

with one of the children while another individual watched via webcam, and briefly discussed 

getting together the next time Aussie was in the United States. 

The discussions with Aussie as a whole are relevant to Defendant’s intent given the 

subject matter discussed by the parties. Specific portions of the conversations are particularly 

probative of the Defendant’s intent, knowledge, and absence of mistake in this case. First, the 

Defendant admits to Aussie, just as he did to JP, that in the past he had sexual contact with an 

eleven year-old boy. Ex. D at 24, 26, & 37. Such admissions are highly relevant to the 

Defendant’s intent to actually coerce or entice the minors at issue in this case. The Second 

Circuit in United States v. Douglas, 415 F. App’x 271 (2d Cir. 2011), upheld the admission of 
17 

testimony from the defendant’s ex-girlfriend that she once saw a transcript of a chat in which the 

defendant claimed to have molested his niece and other minor children. Id. at 273. Similarly, 

the Seventh Circuit in United States v. Zahursky, 580 F.3d 515 (7th Cir. 2009), affirmed the 

district court’s decision to admit transcripts of chats the defendant engaged in with various 

female minors as Rule 404(b) evidence. In the chats, the Zahursky “expressed his sexual interest 

in fourteen-year-old-girls,” and he “admi[tted] to having had sex with a fourteen-year-old,” 

which was relevant to intent to entice the minor female at issue in the case. Id. at 524. The 

Defendant’s repeated admission to Aussie is likewise probative evidence of his intent in this 

case. 

Second, referring to the eleven year-old boy the Defendant admitted to having sexual 

contact with, the Defendant indicated that he “got [the boy] stoned,” which serves as further 

corroboration of the Defendant’s plan to use drugs of some kind when having sexual contact 

with children discussed with JP. Ex. D at 39. Third, the Defendant told Aussie that he would 

“love to find a guy with access who needs a bud to help him out,” id. at 27, which is consistent 

with what the Government claims the Defendant intended in this case: to engage in sexual 

conduct with JP and a minor simultaneously. Fourth, the parties not only discussed conversing 

over Skype, but that same day the Defendant opened an account with Skype. Id. at 28, 29; Gov’t 

Reply Ex. E. This portion of the parties’ conversation is significant because Aussie indicated in 

earlier discussions that he would have illicit sexual contact with children while other adults 

watched via Skype. The fact that the Defendant took the step of creating a Skype account to 

allow him to interact with Aussie is highly relevant to the jury’s determination as to whether the 

Defendant’s discussions with JP were mere “fantasies,” or whether the Defendant intended to 

coerce or entice the minors in question. 
18 

The subject matter of the Defendant’s conversations with Aussie creates some risk of 

prejudice. However, in a case that by definition concerns sexual activity with minors, the 

discussions with Aussie are not unduly prejudicial. Moreover, the Court reviewed each line of 

the chat, and redacted the most prejudicial but least probative portions of the chat as set forth in 

the Appendix. In light of the extensive probative value of the Defendant’s conversations with 

Aussie, the probative value of the redacted chat is not substantially outweighed by the risk of 

undue prejudice. The Court shall admit the redacted chat with Aussie, as well as the emails 

confirming the Defendant’s creation of a Skype account.8

4. Yahoo User4: “adt” 

Yahoo User4 used a screen name abbreviated to “adt,” and conversed with the Defendant 

on January 16, February 7, and February 14, 2012. Ex. D at 23-24, 69-71, & 86-91. Most of the 

conversations concerned how busy both individuals were, id. at 69-71, and their mutual interest 

in motorcycles, id. at 86-89. On February 14, after a discussion of their motorcycles, the 

Defendant states “love a hot motorcycle pervy guy—hehe.” Id. at 89. adt suggests that he and 

the Defendant “go riding sometime,” and “see if [they] can attract any passengers.” Id. The 

Defendant replied “SURE,” and asked adt “who would be your fantasy passenger?” Id. In 

response, adt said “lol,” and “not sure he’d reach teh pegs.” Id. The Defendant indicated he 

“love[d] that, too.” Id. After adt asked if the Defendant was located in Maryland, the Defendant 

replied that he was in fact in Richmond, Virginia. Id. at 90. The parties briefly discussed 

meeting in person, joking about the lack of large towns between their respective locations. Id. 

 8

 The Defendant argues that the Skype emails fall outside the scope of Rule 404(b) 

because they are not evidence of “other crimes.” As explained by the D.C. Circuit: “[t]he other 

activity need not have resulted in a charge or conviction; indeed, the defendant may even have 

been acquitted of the conduct, or the conduct may have been entirely lawful.” United States v. 

Long, 328 F.3d 655, 661 (D.C. Cir. 2003). 
19 

Two of the Defendant’s conversations with adt implicitly mention the parties’ interests in 

sexual contact with minors, though neither is explicit. The February 14, 2012 conversation is 

perhaps the most probative of those with adt because it involved the Defendant raising that topic 

towards the end of an otherwise innocuous discussion of motorcycles. Additionally, the fact that 

the Defendant disclosed his actual geographic location and expressed interest in meeting up with 

adt for an implied illicit purpose is probative of the Defendant’s intent in this case. The 

Defendant’s chats with adt pose a minimal risk of prejudice because they only implicitly refer to 

sexual contact with children. The Court shall admit a limited portion of the Defendant’s 

February 14, 2012 chat with adt, as set forth in the Appendix. The minimal risk of undue 

prejudice does not substantially outweigh the probative value of the portions the Court is 

admitting. 

D. Emails with Yahoo User5 

Finally, the Government proposes to introduce at trial a series of emails between the 

Defendant and “James Cox,” referred to by the Government as Yahoo User5. On October 28, 

2011, Cox sent the Defendant an email with the subject line “us,” and three attachments: two 

photos of a male who appears to be in his early twenties posing with a two to three year-old boy, 

and one photo of the boy alone.9

 None of the photos would be considered explicit or sexual in 

nature. On October 2, 2011, the Defendant replied with the greeting “hey handsomes,” and 

stated that he “really have enjoyed our chats and want to do more. just to let you know I am 

thinking about you.” Gov’t Reply Ex. F. Two days later, the Defendant contacted Cox again 

saying “missed you in chat last evening,” and “[s]till thinking about you and common interests.” 

 9

 The Government submitted the text of the emails as Exhibit F to its Reply. Because the 

male minor has not been identified, the Government did not file the attached images on the 

public docket, but provided a copy of the images to the Court on January 11, 2013. 
20 

Id. 

The Defendant objects to introduction of the emails and attached photos under the rubric 

of Rule 404(b) because they are not sexual in nature. Although not explicit or graphic, the 

Defendant addressed the first reply email to both Cox and the boy, indicated he “want[ed] to do 

more,” and followed up two days later referencing their “common interests.” The language in 

the emails is consistent with the language the Defendant used in online chats to refer to sexual 

contact with children. The suggestive nature of the Defendant’s emails is sufficiently probative. 

See United States v. Thurber, 377 F. App’x 658, 660 (9th Cir. 2010) (holding that the 

defendant’s sexually suggestive online screen name and profile picture were probative of his 

intent in contacting individuals in online chat rooms). 

The use of this suggestive language in the Defendant’s emails is probative of the 

Defendant’s intent to coerce JP’s three year-old nephew to engage in illicit sexual conduct, given 

the implied involvement of a minor child. Moreover, the fact that the Defendant took the 

initiative to email Cox after he was not online on a particular night is particularly strong evidence 

that the Defendant intended to follow through with the implied discussion of sexual conduct 

involving the pictured minor child. The fact that the child in the picture appears to be 

approximately the same age as JP’s fictional nephew makes the emails and pictures even more 

probative of the Defendant’s intent. For these reasons, the Court finds the Defendant’s emails 

with James Cox are appropriate Rule 404(b) evidence of the Defendant’s intent, knowledge, and 

absence of mistake in this case. The Court shall permit the Government to introduce the photo of 

Cox and the unidentified minor in which Cox is holding the boy and is not wearing a shirt. The 

photograph is probative of the Defendant’s intent insofar as it demonstrates the Defendant was 

addressing his reply email to both the adult and the minor child. The Court will exclude the 
21 

other two photographs as duplicative. There is minimal risk of undue prejudice because the 

photo and the emails are not sexually explicit. Accordingly, the Court finds the probative value 

of the emails and the single photo is not substantially outweighed by the risk of undue prejudice. 

IV. CONCLUSION 

 The proposed Rule 404(b) evidence proffered by the Government is probative evidence 

of the Defendant’s intent, knowledge, and absence of mistake in this case. The evidence may not 

be dispositive of the Defendant’s intent, and the Defendant may ultimately convince the jury that 

although there is evidence he is sexually attracted to children, he did not have the requisite intent 

under section 2422(b). Evidence in the form of images depicting child pornography and recently 

accessed websites and files with names indicative of child pornography is relevant to show the 

Defendant’s sexual attraction to children, and is thus probative of his intent to persuade or coerce 

the minors at issue in this case to engage in illicit sexual activity. In chats with other individuals, 

the Defendant discussed the logistics of engaging in sexual contact with minors and his interest 

in having sexual contact with minors (including with the participation of another adult), which is 

probative of his intent in engaging in similar conversations with JP. Overall, the redacted 

evidence is highly probative of the Defendant’s criminal intent, which will likely be the primary 

focus of the defense. The redacted Rule 404(b) evidence is necessary to enable the jury to 

properly evaluate the Defendant’s intent in a case where the Defendant’s conduct is generally 

undisputed. At this stage, the Government has met its burden to show that the redacted evidence 

is probative of non-propensity purposes under Rule 404(b), and there is sufficient evidence to 

support a finding by the jury that the Defendant committed each of the other acts. 

 The Court will make a determination as to the admissibility of the thumbcache images 

(individually and in combination) once the Defendant is given an opportunity to review the 
22 

images and lodge objections. As set forth above, the Court reviewed each line of the other 

exhibits proposed by the Government, and finds that the probative value of the evidence is not 

substantially outweighed by the risk of undue prejudice. Furthermore, the Court finds that all of 

the Rule 404(b) evidence in combination is not unduly prejudicial. The Court is admitting only 

five lines from the Defendant’s browser history and the names of three recently accessed files. 

The chats have been substantially redacted so as to limit the overall volume of evidence and 

remove the least probative but most prejudicial aspects of the chats. Moreover, the chats each 

have separate probative value such that redacted chats will not be cumulative. The overall 

amount of Rule 404(b) evidence is appropriate given that it is all relevant to the Defendant’s 

intent, which is likely to be the central issue in the case. Ultimately, the evidence in this case is 

probative in part because it concerns the disturbing topics the Defendant discussed in the 

conversations leading to the Superseding Indictment. Finally, the Court shall instruct the jury as 

to the limited purposes for which the evidence is admitted, at the time of admission and in the 

final instructions, which substantially limits any risk of unfair prejudice. Long, 328 F.3d at 662. 

Accordingly, the Court finds the probative value of the evidence at issue, in isolation and 

considered together, is not substantially outweighed by the risk of undue prejudice. 

Accordingly, the Government’s [26] Motion in Limine to Introduce Evidence Pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) is GRANTED IN PART and otherwise HELD IN ABEYANCE 

as set forth above. 

An appropriate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. 

 /s/ 

 COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Criminal No. 12-65 (CKK) 

APPENDIX 

TO 

JANUARY 13, 2013 MEMORANDUM OPINION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 v. 

PAUL DAVID HITE, 

 Defendant. 
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User1 ("riley")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message6/24/11 12:27 AM riley corvette_2007 i saw my sisters boy naked

6/24/11 12:27 AM riley corvette_2007 his a cam in bathroom b4 he showered

6/24/11 12:27 AM corvette_2007 rileymarc hey stud

6/24/11 12:27 AM riley corvette_2007 recorded him getting undresses

6/24/11 12:27 AM riley corvette_2007 recorded him getting undresses

6/24/11 12:27 AM corvette_2007 riley MMMMM

6/24/11 12:27 AM corvette_2007 riley fuckin HOT

6/24/11 12:29 AM corvette_2007 riley sexy as hell?

6/24/11 12:29 AM riley corvette_2007

god i want to fuck him so bad now hes got a tiny lil cock hes 

balls and cock of a baby

6/24/11 12:29 AM riley corvette_2007

god i want to fuck him so bad now hes got a tiny lil cock hes 

balls and cock of a baby

6/24/11 12:29 AM riley corvette_2007 but its so hot seeing it

6/24/11 12:29 AM corvette_2007 riley fuckin hot stud

6/24/11 12:29 AM corvette_2007 riley sure it is fantastic

6/24/11 12:29 AM corvette_2007 riley he the one that spent the night a while back?

6/24/11 12:30 AM riley corvette_2007 yea

6/24/11 12:30 AM corvette_2007 riley gotta have him back over SOON

6/24/11 12:30 AM riley corvette_2007 hes on counch sleepin but I need to get a roofie to knock him 

6/24/11 12:30 AM riley corvette_2007 hes on counch sleepin but I need to get a roofie to knock him 

6/24/11 12:31 AM corvette_2007 riley damn‐‐‐he over at your house now?

6/24/11 12:31 AM riley corvette_2007 yea

6/24/11 12:31 AM riley corvette_2007 yea

6/24/11 12:31 AM riley corvette_2007 but nothing to give him right now

6/24/11 12:31 AM corvette_2007 riley WOW

6/24/11 12:31 AM corvette_2007 riley MMMMM

6/24/11 12:32 AM corvette_2007 riley got me fuckin boned
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User1 ("riley")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

6/24/11 12:33 AM riley corvette_2007 hes gettin a lil chubby but still got nice but too

6/24/11 12:33 AM corvette_2007 riley I bet‐‐‐have any Benadryl, anti‐histamine, cold medicine?

6/24/11 12:34 AM riley corvette_2007 nope i need something that he wont stir for at least an hour 

6/24/11 12:34 AM riley corvette_2007 nope i need something

tha0é$n[tab]*åHå≈[cr]áé$φ0é$Θ10[tab]+[eof]0é[tab]╤[tab]

é7[lf]áé[tab]┬0é[tab]╛0[lf]+é79└Iò7k╜F¬uZ7[esc]╧[cr]110782042Z0
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User2 ("justin")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message1/6/12 11:42 PM justin corvette_2007 hey

1/6/12 11:43 PM corvette_2007 justin hi cutie

1/6/12 11:43 PM justin corvette_2007 hey sweetie1/6/12 11:43 PM justin corvette_2007 hey sweetie1/6/12 11:43 PM justin corvette_2007 told you i wasnt the cops!1/6/12 11:43 PM justin corvette_2007 told you i wasnt the cops!

1/6/12 11:43 PM corvette_2007 lol‐‐‐never thought you were

1/6/12 11:43 PM justin corvette_2007 wtf?1/6/12 11:43 PM justin corvette_2007 i know you didnt

1/6/12 11:43 PM justin corvette_2007 just was mad you though I was

*****1/6/12 11:47 PM justin corvette_2007 this is me and eric lookin up at you

1/6/12 11:48 PM justin corvette_2007 did you really think i was a cop?

1/6/12 11:48 PM justin corvette_2007 did you really think i was a cop?

1/6/12 11:48 PM justin corvette_2007 ????????1/6/12 11:48 PM justin corvette_2007 ????????1/6/12 11:48 PM corvette_2007 justin mmmm‐‐‐mega hot

1/6/12 11:48 PM justin corvette_2007 you lucked out!1/6/12 11:48 PM justin corvette_2007 and you know you did.

*****1/6/12 11:50 PM justin corvette_2007 told you i wasnt a cop!1/6/12 11:50 PM justin corvette_2007 lmao1/6/12 11:50 PM justin corvette_2007 lmao1/6/12 11:51 PM corvette_2007 justin lol

1/6/12 11:51 PM corvette_2007 justin same here

1/6/12 11:51 PM justin corvette_2007 are you glad and relieve a bit?

1/6/12 11:51 PM corvette_2007 justin for sure

1/6/12 11:51 PM corvette_2007 justin what you drinking?

1/6/12 11:51 PM justin corvette_2007 not detective dan behind the screen name

*****1/6/12 11:56 PM corvette_2007 justin did not realize was going to be on cam

1/6/12 11:56 PM justin corvette_2007 i told you no cops

*****
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User2 ("justin")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

1/6/12 11:59 PM justin corvette_2007 mmmm....told you i was safe....lmao! will you freaking just s

1/6/12 11:59 PM justin corvette_2007 i would NEVER set anyone up

1/6/12 11:59 PM corvette_2007 justin you are right‐‐‐‐MY bad

1/6/12 11:59 PM justin corvette_2007 thanks baby1/6/12 11:59 PM corvette_2007 justin you are welcome, cutie

1/6/12 11:59 PM justin corvette_2007 i could show you more...i am open for whaterver

*****1/7/12 12:03 AM corvette_2007 justin just chatting with you is pleasing me

1/7/12 12:03 AM justin corvette_2007 btw....if this was the cops they would have arrested you abo

*****1/7/12 12:15 AM justin corvette_2007 did you see my ass?1/7/12 12:15 AM corvette_2007 justin mmmm‐‐‐yes

1/7/12 12:16 AM justin corvette_2007 mmmm

1/7/12 12:16 AM justin corvette_2007 you like younger ass?

1/7/12 12:16 AM justin corvette_2007 its tight right?

1/7/12 12:16 AM corvette_2007 justin oh yeah‐‐‐on BOTH accounts

*****1/7/12 12:18 AM corvette_2007 justin you are HOT

1/7/12 12:18 AM justin corvette_2007 im so glad you like it....now can you admit you are a pedoph

1/7/12 12:18 AM justin corvette_2007 im so glad you like it....now can you admit you are a pedoph

1/7/12 12:18 AM justin corvette_2007 please????

1/7/12 12:19 AM justin corvette_2007 i wont hold against you until you do

1/7/12 12:19 AM corvette_2007 justin lol‐‐‐‐thanks

1/7/12 12:19 AM corvette_2007 justin we LIKE the same things

1/7/12 12:19 AM justin corvette_2007 dont be ashamed

1/7/12 12:19 AM justin corvette_2007 and you know im not a cop

1/7/12 12:19 AM justin corvette_2007 and you know im not a cop

1/7/12 12:19 AM justin corvette_2007 that turned you on didnt it?

1/7/12 12:19 AM justin corvette_2007 that turned you on didnt it?

1/7/12 12:20 AM corvette_2007 justin lol‐‐‐YES

1/7/12 12:20 AM corvette_2007 justin of course it did
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User2 ("justin")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

1/7/12 12:20 AM justin corvette_2007 mmmmmmmmmmmm yesssssss

1/7/12 12:20 AM justin corvette_2007 and guessssss what no cops around your house

1/7/12 12:20 AM justin corvette_2007 you can talk freeley around me

1/7/12 12:20 AM justin corvette_2007 are you learning that.

1/7/12 12:20 AM justin corvette_2007 are you learning that.

1/7/12 12:20 AM justin corvette_2007 ?

1/7/12 12:20 AM justin corvette_2007

co¡╢öà╞Ç1[tab]x8(╨±çI@F4£;0Θ╞2|\`╡1N╪LPNW/¿╟3NXF

#'`'ûâH╟5'%

1/7/12 12:20 AM justin corvette_2007

co¬╖[eof]█Ü>`0 d2@ûká(Ç@╔ █£Ωôî£v}£·

AN╙4█N≥f+4Nñ[lf]N[tab]₧▄ÉE█Na('ö'

1/7/12 12:20 AM justin corvette_2007

co ╪ αJFIFHH

█C[lf][lf][lf][cr][cr]

█C[tab][tab]

1/7/12 12:21 AM corvette_2007 justin I am‐‐‐‐thanks

1/7/12 12:21 AM justin corvette_2007 im just a lil boi and you saw it and no cops

1/7/12 12:21 AM justin corvette_2007 im just a lil boi and you saw it and no cops

1/7/12 12:21 AM justin corvette_2007 did i lie?

1/7/12 12:21 AM corvette_2007 justin not at all

1/7/12 12:22 AM justin corvette_2007 you like what you see?

1/7/12 12:22 AM corvette_2007 justin mmmm‐‐‐yes

*****1/7/12 1:07 AM corvette_2007 justin your friends still there?

1/7/12 1:07 AM justin corvette_2007 mmmmmm.....thanks baby....you are the one who looks hot

1/7/12 1:07 AM justin corvette_2007 no i wish....but lil girl next door wants to cum over.

1/7/12 1:07 AM justin corvette_2007 should i?

1/7/12 1:07 AM justin corvette_2007 should i?

1/7/12 1:08 AM corvette_2007 justin lil girl?

1/7/12 1:08 AM justin corvette_2007 my dad is fucking her now....she is 13

1/7/12 1:08 AM justin corvette_2007 my dad is fucking her now....she is 13

1/7/12 1:08 AM corvette_2007 justin wow‐‐‐mega HOT1/7/12 1:08 AM corvette_2007 justin you ever fuck her?1/7/12 1:09 AM justin corvette_2007 haha.....what kinda of freak do you think i am...1/7/12 1:09 AM justin corvette_2007 haha.....what kinda of freak do you think i am...
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User2 ("justin")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

1/7/12 1:09 AM justin corvette_2007 no

1/7/12 1:09 AM justin corvette_2007 but i want to.

1/7/12 1:09 AM justin corvette_2007 lmao

1/7/12 1:09 AM corvette_2007 justin damn‐‐‐you should tap that pussy

1/7/12 1:09 AM justin corvette_2007 if i do you want to watch?

1/7/12 1:09 AM corvette_2007 justin yes

1/7/12 1:10 AM justin corvette_2007 ok brb...let me see...

1/7/12 1:11 AM justin corvette_2007 OMG....DAD is fucking here blind

1/7/12 1:11 AM justin corvette_2007 lmao

1/7/12 1:11 AM justin corvette_2007 lmao

1/7/12 1:11 AM corvette_2007 justin lol

1/7/12 1:11 AM corvette_2007 justin now?

1/7/12 1:12 AM justin corvette_2007 yeah its rotten...she is screaming....and its his name.

1/7/12 1:12 AM corvette_2007 justin mmmm‐‐‐‐in your house?1/7/12 1:12 AM justin corvette_2007 yeah...shit goes down in my house!

*****1/7/12 1:14 AM corvette_2007 justin love to see you with the girl1/7/12 1:14 AM corvette_2007 justin mmmmm1/7/12 1:14 AM justin haha....mmmm...if you stay up i will have her.

1/7/12 1:15 AM corvette_2007 justin mmmmm

1/7/12 1:15 AM corvette_2007 justin mmmmm1/7/12 1:15 AM corvette_2007 justin that would be HOT

1/7/12 1:15 AM corvette_2007 justin that would be HOT

1/7/12 1:16 AM justin corvette_2007 mmmm....she is sooooo young

1/7/12 1:16 AM justin corvette_2007 she is crying.....mmmmmm yeah i want it

1/7/12 1:16 AM corvette_2007 justin you know I lOVE it

1/7/12 1:16 AM corvette_2007 justin HOT1/7/12 1:16 AM justin corvette_2007 its going to be a bit....dad has to unload in her first.

1/7/12 1:17 AM justin corvette_2007 he fucks all lil girls in neighborhood

1/7/12 1:17 AM corvette_2007 justin damn‐‐‐‐understand1/7/12 1:17 AM corvette_2007 justin MMMMMMMMMM

1/7/12 1:17 AM corvette_2007 justin HOT

1/7/12 1:17 AM corvette_2007 justin GOOD dad
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User2 ("justin")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

1/7/12 1:18 AM justin corvette_2007 haha i just dont want to him to get her preggers

1/7/12 1:18 AM corvette_2007 justin understand

*****1/7/12 1:26 AM justin corvette_2007 we have to chase our own girls

1/7/12 1:26 AM corvette_2007 justin lol‐‐‐so you can't use his merchandise?

1/7/12 1:27 AM corvette_2007 justin that what you are saying?

1/7/12 1:28 AM justin corvette_2007 hey you want a girl we can fuck?

1/7/12 1:28 AM corvette_2007 justin mmmmm

1/7/12 1:28 AM corvette_2007 justin maybe

1/7/12 1:29 AM corvette_2007 justin tell me more

1/7/12 1:29 AM justin corvette_2007 omg....he sent her down......
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User3 ("aussie")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message1/29/12 11:59 PM aussie corvette_2007 hey

1/30/12 12:14 AM corvette_2007 aussie hey guy

1/30/12 12:14 AM aussie corvette_2007 sorry missed u.. how u doing

1/30/12 12:14 AM corvette_2007 aussie horned here‐‐‐you?

1/30/12 12:15 AM aussie corvette_2007 same, horned and perved

1/30/12 12:15 AM aussie corvette_2007 same, horned and perved

1/30/12 12:15 AM corvette_2007 aussie love the perv‐‐‐‐hehe

1/30/12 12:16 AM aussie corvette_2007 sweet... yeah.. what gets ur hard then?

1/30/12 12:16 AM aussie corvette_2007 sweet... yeah.. what gets ur hard then?

1/30/12 12:16 AM corvette_2007 aussie boys‐‐‐‐you?

1/30/12 12:16 AM aussie corvette_2007 oh yes

1/30/12 12:17 AM corvette_2007 aussie mmmm‐‐‐‐you got any?1/30/12 12:17 AM aussie corvette_2007 yep.. u ;‐)

1/30/12 12:17 AM aussie corvette_2007 what are ur stats again mate?

1/30/12 12:17 AM corvette_2007 aussie fuckin A‐‐‐‐no, dammit‐‐‐‐wish I did

1/30/12 12:18 AM aussie corvette_2007 its so fucking intense

1/30/12 12:18 AM corvette_2007 aussie 50 6' 190 34w 44c 6c

1/30/12 12:18 AM corvette_2007 aussie mmmm

1/30/12 12:18 AM aussie corvette_2007 hm nice

1/30/12 12:18 AM aussie corvette_2007 38 here, 6'2", 80kgs, 7"c

1/30/12 12:18 AM corvette_2007 aussie tell me about your boy

1/30/12 12:18 AM corvette_2007 aussie mmmmm‐‐‐‐NICE

1/30/12 12:19 AM aussie corvette_2007 i have access to b17month, g4, b7

1/30/12 12:19 AM corvette_2007 aussie damn‐‐‐‐WOW

1/30/12 12:19 AM corvette_2007 aussie love that

1/30/12 12:19 AM aussie corvette_2007 yeah its intense

1/30/12 12:19 AM corvette_2007 aussie for fuckin SURE

1/30/12 12:20 AM corvette_2007 aussie what you do with them?

1/30/12 12:23 AM corvette_2007 aussie count me in

1/30/12 12:31 AM aussie corvette_2007 what ever i can get away with.. they are my sisters kids

1/30/12 12:32 AM corvette_2007 aussie hehe‐‐‐mmm‐‐‐‐HOT

1/30/12 12:32 AM aussie corvette_2007 u done anything?

1/30/12 12:32 AM aussie corvette_2007 u done anything?
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User3 ("aussie")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

1/30/12 12:32 AM corvette_2007 aussie yrs ago‐‐‐‐son of a bud

1/30/12 12:33 AM aussie corvette_2007 oh mate.. and now u crave it eh..shared or he does not know

1/30/12 12:33 AM corvette_2007 aussie crave it for sure

1/30/12 12:33 AM aussie corvette_2007 yeah once tasted. always deired

1/30/12 12:33 AM aussie corvette_2007 yeah once tasted. always deired

1/30/12 12:33 AM aussie corvette_2007 desired

1/30/12 12:33 AM corvette_2007 aussie he knew‐‐‐‐perv bud

1/30/12 12:33 AM corvette_2007 aussie mmmm

1/30/12 12:34 AM aussie corvette_2007 fuck nice

1/30/12 12:34 AM aussie corvette_2007 fuck nice

1/30/12 12:34 AM corvette_2007 aussie what you done so far with them?

1/30/12 12:34 AM aussie corvette_2007 u lucky fuck.. always wanted to do with a mate, but always a

1/30/12 12:34 AM corvette_2007 aussie wish I was there to share with you

1/30/12 12:34 AM aussie corvette_2007 jacked, in and over, sucked, had them suck me.. fingered

1/30/12 12:34 AM aussie corvette_2007 jacked, in and over, sucked, had them suck me.. fingered

1/30/12 12:35 AM corvette_2007 aussie MMMMMMMMMM

1/30/12 12:35 AM corvette_2007 aussie the b7 love it?

1/30/12 12:38 AM aussie corvette_2007 yeah loves the attention

1/30/12 12:38 AM aussie corvette_2007 yeah loves the attention

1/30/12 12:38 AM aussie corvette_2007 our secret games

1/30/12 12:38 AM aussie corvette_2007 our secret games

1/30/12 12:38 AM corvette_2007 aussie HOT

1/30/12 12:38 AM corvette_2007 aussie he get naked and hard?

2/1/12 4:01 PM aussie corvette_2007 hey mate perving?2/1/12 4:01 PM corvette_2007 aussie hey stud‐‐‐oh YEAH‐‐‐‐you?

2/1/12 4:03 PM aussie corvette_2007 yes mate

*****2/1/12 4:04 PM corvette_2007 aussie love your secret games2/1/12 4:05 PM corvette_2007 aussie none currently

2/1/12 4:05 PM aussie corvette_2007 hot eh.. so fucking intense

2/1/12 4:05 PM aussie corvette_2007 i had a hot session last night on skype with english mate
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User3 ("aussie")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

2/1/12 4:06 PM corvette_2007 aussie nice‐‐‐‐‐just you 2?2/1/12 4:06 PM aussie corvette_2007 yeah ;‐02/1/12 4:07 PM aussie corvette_2007 i love others seeing

2/1/12 4:07 PM corvette_2007 aussie mmmm‐‐‐but you were alone or have one of your hotties wi

2/1/12 4:07 PM aussie corvette_2007 a hottie with me

2/1/12 4:08 PM corvette_2007 aussie DAMN‐‐‐LOVE to see sometime

2/1/12 4:09 PM aussie corvette_2007 he has 6yo..

2/1/12 4:09 PM aussie corvette_2007 he has 6yo..

2/1/12 4:09 PM corvette_2007 aussie ahhh‐‐‐‐MMMMM

2/1/12 4:09 PM corvette_2007 aussie which one were you with last night?

2/1/12 4:10 PM aussie corvette_2007 yngest boy2/1/12 4:10 PM aussie corvette_2007 yngest boy2/1/12 4:10 PM aussie corvette_2007 its safer

2/1/12 4:11 PM corvette_2007 aussie MMMMMM‐‐‐the 17m?

2/1/12 4:11 PM aussie corvette_2007 yes2/1/12 4:11 PM aussie corvette_2007 yes2/1/12 4:11 PM aussie corvette_2007 good memory

2/1/12 4:11 PM aussie corvette_2007 good memory

2/1/12 4:12 PM corvette_2007 aussie hehe‐‐‐‐love pedo‐‐‐‐totally remember

2/1/12 4:12 PM corvette_2007 aussie what did you do with him on cam?

2/1/12 4:13 PM aussie corvette_2007 play with cock. rubb mine on him etc. depends what the dud

2/1/12 4:13 PM corvette_2007 aussie fuckin love that

2/1/12 4:14 PM corvette_2007 aussie he suck your cock?2/1/12 4:15 PM aussie corvette_2007 yes.. i nuzzle into his mouth

2/1/12 4:16 PM corvette_2007 aussie mmm‐‐‐‐shoot in his mouth?

2/1/12 4:17 PM aussie corvette_2007 u have access?

2/1/12 4:17 PM corvette_2007 aussie dammit‐‐‐not currently‐‐‐‐2/1/12 4:18 PM aussie corvette_2007 love guys who get off on it too

2/1/12 4:18 PM aussie corvette_2007 u done anything?

2/1/12 4:18 PM corvette_2007 aussie yrs ago‐‐‐‐son of a perv bud

2/1/12 4:21 PM aussie corvette_2007 fuck nice...2/1/12 4:21 PM aussie corvette_2007 yeah dont u just crave it

2/1/12 4:21 PM aussie corvette_2007 i know im into it cause mums bf got me going at 8
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User3 ("aussie")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

2/1/12 4:22 PM aussie corvette_2007 its in my blood

2/1/12 4:22 PM aussie corvette_2007 its in my blood

2/1/12 4:22 PM aussie corvette_2007 and will be in my boys too

2/1/12 4:22 PM aussie corvette_2007 and will be in my boys too

2/1/12 4:22 PM corvette_2007 aussie lol‐‐‐‐MMMMMMMMMMMM‐‐‐‐‐fuckin HOT

2/1/12 4:22 PM corvette_2007 aussie TOTALLY crave it here

2/1/12 4:23 PM aussie corvette_2007 i dont get much time alone.. so when i do.. ;‐)

2/1/12 4:23 PM corvette_2007 aussie hehe‐‐‐‐NICE

2/1/12 4:23 PM aussie corvette_2007

loads of hot vids too.. inspirational.. but risky.. i prefer to hav

to watch.. never had someone here in person though.. id lfu

2/1/12 4:23 PM aussie corvette_2007

loads of hot vids too.. inspirational.. but risky.. i prefer to hav

to watch.. never had someone here in person though.. id lfu

2/1/12 4:24 PM corvette_2007 aussie oh yeah‐‐‐‐love all of the above

2/1/12 4:24 PM corvette_2007 aussie love to find a guy with access who needs a bud to help him o

2/1/12 4:25 PM ctWbc$$$$$fpΦ

2/1/12 4:26 PM aussie corvette_2007 wish u were local

2/1/12 4:27 PM corvette_2007 aussie SAME for sure2/1/12 4:27 PM corvette_2007 aussie love to see you with the 7b also‐‐‐‐MMMMMM

2/1/12 4:29 PM aussie corvette_2007 he is cute, slim.. see his bone outline.. love that.. cute as

2/1/12 4:29 PM aussie corvette_2007 gets nice and hard for dad

2/1/12 4:30 PM corvette_2007 aussie MMMM‐‐‐love to suck his cock and eat out his boy ass

2/1/12 4:31 PM corvette_2007 aussie ever cam with him?

2/1/12 4:32 PM aussie corvette_2007 yes but have to be careful, dont want him tellin dudes

2/1/12 4:33 PM corvette_2007 aussie tellin dudes?

2/1/12 4:35 PM aussie corvette_2007

yeah i dont want to get into trouble.. so i keep it with other 

normalises it.. but try to keep it our secret

2/1/12 4:35 PM aussie corvette_2007

yeah i dont want to get into trouble.. so i keep it with other 

normalises it.. but try to keep it our secret

2/1/12 4:35 PM corvette_2007 aussie TOTALLY got ya2/1/12 4:36 PM corvette_2007 aussie mmmm‐‐‐‐wish I had someone to share with you on cam
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User3 ("aussie")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

2/1/12 4:37 PM aussie corvette_2007

me too.. but would do vids.. see how things go.. develop som

any stuff?

2/1/12 4:38 PM corvette_2007 aussie

mmmm‐‐‐love to keep chatting and develop trust‐‐‐‐I did hav

and got cold feet a few motnhs ago and destroyed them

2/1/12 4:39 PM aussie corvette_2007 yeah im the same mate

2/1/12 4:39 PM aussie corvette_2007 its risk

2/1/12 4:39 PM aussie corvette_2007 its risk

2/1/12 4:39 PM corvette_2007 aussie regret it now but were risky as you say2/1/12 4:39 PM aussie corvette_2007 risky

2/1/12 4:39 PM aussie corvette_2007 i get scared im going to lose everything

2/1/12 4:39 PM corvette_2007 aussie SAME here

2/1/12 4:40 PM aussie corvette_2007 anyway happy to chat on skpe if u want.. add me if u like.. se

2/1/12 4:40 PM corvette_2007 aussie SURE‐‐‐‐don't have skype‐‐‐‐‐this won't work?

2/1/12 4:41 PM aussie corvette_2007

yeah this isnt safe.. skype is encrypted.. much safer and it jus

us.. this goes via yahoo and i know they check stuff

2/1/12 4:42 PM corvette_2007 aussie gotcha‐‐‐‐will have to download skype

2/1/12 4:42 PM aussie corvette_2007 its up to u mate

2/1/12 4:43 PM aussie corvette_2007 hey ur in uk yeah?

2/1/12 4:43 PM corvette_2007 aussie no‐‐‐usa

*****2/1/12 4:50 PM corvette_2007 aussie MMMMMM‐‐‐‐would LOVE to do Disney with you2/1/12 4:50 PM aussie corvette_2007 i take the boys, gf takes the girl.. we split up2/1/12 4:50 PM aussie corvette_2007 is it a good place to perv?

2/1/12 4:50 PM aussie corvette_2007 love it if there was a private place to play there

2/1/12 4:51 PM aussie corvette_2007 would make it so pervy..

2/1/12 4:51 PM corvette_2007 aussie hehe‐‐‐not sure about pervin‐‐‐‐‐except at the hotel

*****2/1/12 4:54 PM aussie corvette_2007 bad eh.. u single or have partner?

2/1/12 4:54 PM corvette_2007 aussie love bad‐‐‐‐lol‐‐‐single here2/1/12 4:55 PM aussie corvette_2007 wow freedom to have fun eh

2/1/12 4:55 PM aussie corvette_2007 ur older yeah..lvoe to see em with older guy

2/1/12 4:55 PM aussie corvette_2007 ur older yeah..lvoe to see em with older guy

2/1/12 4:56 PM corvette_2007 aussie lol‐‐‐‐much freedom‐‐‐‐‐MMMMMM‐‐‐‐50 here‐‐‐‐LOVE to b
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User3 ("aussie")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

2/1/12 4:56 PM hot

2/1/12 4:56 PM hot2/1/12 4:56 PM mate have to go.. get skype for next time see u

2/1/12 6:58 PM aussie corvette_2007 hey mate back on .. anything happening?

2/1/12 6:59 PM corvette_2007 aussie hey stud‐‐‐‐just pervin here‐‐‐‐hehe‐‐‐you?

2/1/12 6:59 PM aussie corvette_2007 at work with blue balls now.. after our chat

2/1/12 6:59 PM aussie corvette_2007 at work with blue balls now.. after our chat

2/1/12 7:00 PM corvette_2007 aussie mmm‐‐‐lol‐‐‐‐can relate

2/1/12 7:01 PM aussie corvette_2007 feel like picking up nate from school for quality time togethe

2/1/12 7:01 PM corvette_2007 aussie fuckin LOVE your scene

2/1/12 7:01 PM corvette_2007 aussie hehe‐‐‐‐he would LOVE that

2/1/12 7:02 PM corvette_2007 aussie nate is 7?2/1/12 7:02 PM aussie corvette_2007 yes

2/1/12 7:03 PM aussie corvette_2007 daniel is the one one.. and katie is 4

2/1/12 7:03 PM aussie corvette_2007 daniel is the one one.. and katie is 4

2/1/12 7:03 PM corvette_2007 aussie fuckin A, stud‐‐‐‐all MEGA HOT

2/1/12 7:03 PM aussie corvette_2007 oh yes2/1/12 7:03 PM aussie corvette_2007 u hairy or smooth?

2/1/12 7:03 PM corvette_2007 aussie hairy here‐‐‐‐you?2/1/12 7:04 PM aussie corvette_2007 perfect same

2/1/12 7:04 PM aussie corvette_2007 love feeling em against me

2/1/12 7:04 PM aussie corvette_2007 love feeling em against me

2/1/12 7:05 PM corvette_2007 aussie mmm‐‐‐‐same‐‐‐‐love the contrast

2/1/12 7:05 PM aussie corvette_2007

yes perfect, hairy smooth, big small, yng old, innocent contro

power.. fuck its awesome

2/1/12 7:05 PM aussie corvette_2007

yes perfect, hairy smooth, big small, yng old, innocent contro

power.. fuck its awesome

2/1/12 7:06 PM corvette_2007 aussie lol‐‐‐‐TOTALLY agreed2/1/12 7:06 PM corvette_2007 aussie MMMMMM2/1/12 7:06 PM corvette_2007 aussie tongue kiss with them?2/1/12 10:18 PM aussie corvette_2007 u still perving?
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User3 ("aussie")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

2/1/12 10:19 PM corvette_2007 aussie hey stud‐‐‐you KNOW it‐‐‐lol2/1/12 10:19 PM aussie corvette_2007 oh hot.. edgin eh

2/1/12 10:19 PM corvette_2007 aussie mmm‐‐yes‐‐‐‐just wish you were here

2/1/12 10:27 PM aussie corvette_2007 yeah be hot eh..

2/1/12 10:27 PM aussie corvette_2007 yeah be hot eh..

2/1/12 10:27 PM aussie corvette_2007 love to play with a daddy type.. u could be gramps.. a happy 

2/1/12 10:27 PM corvette_2007 aussie fuckin A, stud‐‐‐mmm‐‐‐lol‐‐‐‐would love to in a happy family

2/1/12 10:28 PM aussie corvette_2007 ;‐) so how did u get into it.. did u play when u wre ynger?

2/1/12 10:28 PM aussie corvette_2007 ;‐) so how did u get into it.. did u play when u wre ynger?

2/1/12 10:29 PM corvette_2007 aussie no‐‐‐lol‐‐‐had a fuck bud yrs ago that was pervy‐‐‐‐he got me 

2/1/12 10:30 PM aussie corvette_2007 fuck ur lucky.. must have been nice.. make ur head spin?

2/1/12 10:30 PM aussie corvette_2007 fuck ur lucky.. must have been nice.. make ur head spin?

2/1/12 10:30 PM corvette_2007 aussie was lucky‐‐‐‐but did not last‐‐‐‐TOTALLY‐‐‐‐LOVED it

2/1/12 10:30 PM aussie corvette_2007 pity u lost touch.. his boy is prob a dad now

2/1/12 10:31 PM aussie corvette_2007 why did it not last

2/1/12 10:31 PM aussie corvette_2007 why did it not last

2/1/12 10:31 PM corvette_2007 aussie he moved away‐‐‐‐wife was after him

2/1/12 10:32 PM aussie corvette_2007 oh fuck.. maybe she knew?

2/1/12 10:32 PM aussie corvette_2007 oh fuck.. maybe she knew?

2/1/12 10:33 PM aussie corvette_2007 how ood was his boy? was he into it?

2/1/12 10:33 PM aussie corvette_2007 how ood was his boy? was he into it?

2/1/12 10:33 PM corvette_2007 aussie not sure‐‐‐‐think he left the country‐‐‐‐very sudden‐‐‐‐11‐‐‐‐h

2/1/12 10:33 PM aussie corvette_2007 oh fuck perfect

2/1/12 10:33 PM aussie corvette_2007 oh fuck perfect

2/1/12 10:33 PM aussie corvette_2007

yeah prob in trouble.. why the fuck does it have to be so har

perfect

2/1/12 10:34 PM corvette_2007 aussie AGREED‐‐‐‐we ALL loved it

2/1/12 10:34 PM corvette_2007 aussie I KNOW‐‐‐and SO natural‐‐‐kids love it too

2/1/12 10:34 PM aussie corvette_2007 oh yeah.. they totally love it.. so who says its 18.. its fucked

2/1/12 10:35 PM aussie corvette_2007 and.. their bodies respond

2/1/12 10:35 PM aussie corvette_2007 and.. their bodies respond

2/1/12 10:35 PM corvette_2007 aussie just victorian puritan bullshit‐‐‐lol
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User3 ("aussie")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

2/1/12 10:35 PM corvette_2007 aussie TOTALLY

2/1/12 10:36 PM aussie corvette_2007 they even hae amazing boygasms

2/1/12 10:36 PM aussie corvette_2007 they even hae amazing boygasms

2/1/12 10:36 PM corvette_2007 aussie lol‐‐‐yes‐‐‐‐nate had dry cums yet?

2/1/12 10:38 PM aussie corvette_2007 yes2/1/12 10:38 PM aussie corvette_2007 yes2/1/12 10:38 PM aussie corvette_2007 last year was first time

2/1/12 10:38 PM aussie corvette_2007 last year was first time

2/1/12 10:38 PM aussie corvette_2007 i had to coach him to relax and enjoy, he was worried

2/1/12 10:38 PM aussie corvette_2007 so hot

2/1/12 10:38 PM aussie corvette_2007 so hot2/1/12 10:38 PM corvette_2007 aussie MMMMMMMMMM

2/1/12 10:38 PM corvette_2007 aussie NICE

2/1/12 10:38 PM aussie corvette_2007 fuck yes

2/1/12 10:38 PM corvette_2007 aussie bet he LOVES it now

2/1/12 10:39 PM corvette_2007 aussie what gets him off?

2/1/12 10:39 PM aussie corvette_2007 yes

2/1/12 10:39 PM aussie corvette_2007 yes2/1/12 10:39 PM aussie corvette_2007 concentrated work on his cock.. particularly the head, nice a

2/1/12 10:39 PM aussie corvette_2007 concentrated work on his cock.. particularly the head, nice a

2/1/12 10:40 PM corvette_2007 aussie hot‐‐‐‐kissing his cock?

2/1/12 10:40 PM aussie corvette_2007 yes and lips

2/1/12 10:40 PM corvette_2007 aussie wow‐‐‐he likes to mouth kiss?

2/1/12 10:41 PM aussie corvette_2007 yeah i have from early age..

2/1/12 10:41 PM aussie corvette_2007 he likes it cause its adult thing to do

2/1/12 10:41 PM aussie corvette_2007 he likes it cause its adult thing to do

2/1/12 10:42 PM corvette_2007 aussie LOVE that‐‐‐‐so fuckin HOT

2/1/12 10:42 PM corvette_2007 aussie he like tongue?

2/1/12 10:42 PM aussie corvette_2007 yeah ;‐) its a game for him, so phot for me

2/1/12 10:42 PM aussie corvette_2007 u do that with ur mates boy?

2/1/12 10:42 PM corvette_2007 aussie YES
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User3 ("aussie")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

2/1/12 10:43 PM corvette_2007 aussie loved it all‐‐‐particularly if you got him stoned‐‐‐‐hehe

2/1/12 10:44 PM aussie corvette_2007 oh mate.. thats so kewl

2/1/12 10:45 PM aussie corvette_2007 yeah some alchol is hot too

2/1/12 10:45 PM corvette_2007 aussie oh yeah‐‐‐‐‐great for relaxing a bit

2/1/12 10:46 PM aussie corvette_2007 totally

2/1/12 10:46 PM aussie corvette_2007 love to meet ur mate.. who corrupted u.. introduced u to it.. 

2/1/12 10:46 PM aussie corvette_2007 love to meet ur mate.. who corrupted u.. introduced u to it.. 

2/1/12 10:47 PM corvette_2007 aussie

yes‐‐‐‐we had played a while before and he started "feeling m

scene

2/1/12 10:48 PM aussie corvette_2007 hot.. nice one.. u think it was odd? or he very persuasive?

2/1/12 10:49 PM corvette_2007 aussie he knew I was open and pervy

2/1/12 10:55 PM aussie corvette_2007 ah sweet

2/1/12 10:55 PM aussie corvette_2007 ah sweet

2/1/12 10:55 PM aussie corvette_2007 ur lucky mate.. bet it was love

2/1/12 10:56 PM corvette_2007 aussie was sweet for the few weeks it lasted‐‐‐‐‐LOVED it here

2/1/12 10:56 PM aussie corvette_2007

oh.. weeks, thats sad. hope u appreciated it at the time.. its 

why i wanna share with right person

2/1/12 10:57 PM corvette_2007 aussie TOTALLY amazing‐‐‐‐‐was in utopia

2/1/12 10:57 PM corvette_2007 aussie love to find similar situation again

2/1/12 11:00 PM aussie corvette_2007 i get lots saying the same.. but has to be right.. u know.. its s

2/1/12 11:01 PM corvette_2007 aussie TOTALLY concur‐‐‐‐right there with you

2/1/12 11:08 PM aussie corvette_2007

there is one dude locally.. we have chatted for ages.. never s

hes ynger, but hot and lives interstate.. never been able to a

here i have family events or something

2/1/12 11:08 PM aussie corvette_2007 but its so intense, im patient

2/1/12 11:09 PM corvette_2007 aussie think patience and instinct the key‐‐‐‐‐have to develop trust 

2/1/12 11:10 PM aussie corvette_2007 yeah2/1/12 11:10 PM aussie corvette_2007

thx for chatting i appreciate it.. i value that you have had exp

other side

2/1/12 11:11 PM corvette_2007 aussie you are more than welcome‐‐‐‐love to chat about pedo

*****
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User3 ("aussie")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

2/1/12 11:10 PM aussie corvette_2007 so u got any yng mates or fuck buddies? *****

*****2/1/12 11:20 PM corvette_2007 aussie

yw‐‐‐‐‐wow‐‐‐‐nice‐‐‐‐‐nothing routine currently‐‐‐‐just a rand

now and then

2/1/12 11:21 PM corvette_2007 aussie so hung up on perv‐‐‐‐lol‐‐‐‐THAT is what really bones me an

2/1/12 11:21 PM aussie corvette_2007 yeah understand same here.. a perv orgasm is amazing

2/1/12 11:22 PM corvette_2007 aussie the boner I get with perv is amazing

2/1/12 11:22 PM corvette_2007 aussie nothing else compares

2/1/12 11:26 PM aussie corvette_2007 exactly

2/1/12 11:27 PM corvette_2007 aussie hehe‐‐‐been boned all day chatting with you

*****2/1/12 11:49 PM aussie corvette_2007

my perv time is usually saturday morning when she works, k

and choose one to play with.. they lvoe playstation or dvds

2/1/12 11:50 PM corvette_2007 aussie nice‐‐‐‐so the other 2 entertain themselves while you play w

2/1/12 11:50 PM corvette_2007 aussie HOT

2/1/12 11:50 PM aussie corvette_2007

yes.. figure its safer that way, other time is if she is out even

bed.. then fun time in their room

2/1/12 11:50 PM aussie corvette_2007

yes.. figure its safer that way, other time is if she is out even

bed.. then fun time in their room

2/1/12 11:50 PM aussie corvette_2007 sometimes they sleep

2/1/12 11:50 PM aussie corvette_2007 sometimes they sleep

2/1/12 11:51 PM corvette_2007 aussie fuckin HOT

2/1/12 11:51 PM corvette_2007 aussie so they live with you?

2/1/12 11:55 PM aussie corvette_2007 yes

*****2/9/12 11:01 PM aussie corvette_2007 mate hows things?

2/9/12 11:05 PM corvette_2007 aussie hey stud

2/9/12 11:05 PM corvette_2007 aussie pervin‐‐‐lol‐‐‐you?

*****2/9/12 11:09 PM corvette_2007 aussie love to see you (and others) on cam sometime
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User3 ("aussie")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

2/9/12 11:13 PM corvette_2007 aussie mmm‐‐‐‐gotta run here‐‐‐‐thanks for saying hello‐‐‐‐keep in t
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User4 ("adt")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message2/14/12 10:25 PM corvette_2007 adt love a hot motorcycle pervy guy‐‐‐‐hehe

2/14/12 10:26 PM adt corvette_2007 lol

2/14/12 10:26 PM adt corvette_2007 we chould go riding sometime.

2/14/12 10:26 PM corvette_2007 adt other area we have in common

2/14/12 10:26 PM adt corvette_2007 see if we can attract any passangers. :P2/14/12 10:26 PM adt corvette_2007 see if we can attract any passangers. :P2/14/12 10:26 PM corvette_2007 adt SURE

2/14/12 10:26 PM corvette_2007 adt mmmmm

2/14/12 10:27 PM corvette_2007 adt who would be your fantasy passenger?

2/14/12 10:28 PM adt corvette_2007 lol

2/14/12 10:28 PM adt corvette_2007 not sure he'd reach teh pegs.

2/14/12 10:28 PM adt corvette_2007 not sure he'd reach teh pegs.

2/14/12 10:29 PM corvette_2007 adt oh YEAH

2/14/12 10:29 PM corvette_2007 adt love that, too

****2/14/12 10:37 PM adt corvette_2007 you are in md, right?

2/14/12 10:38 PM corvette_2007 adt no‐‐‐‐va‐‐‐‐Richmond

2/14/12 10:38 PM adt corvette_2007 Oh ok.

2/14/12 10:38 PM adt corvette_2007 i knew you were close.

2/14/12 10:38 PM adt corvette_2007 i knew you were close.

2/14/12 10:38 PM corvette_2007 adt yes‐‐‐‐not too far at all

2/14/12 10:39 PM adt corvette_2007 :)

2/14/12 10:40 PM adt corvette_2007 hey we could meet in the middle in the big town of...........

2/14/12 10:40 PM adt adt well.

2/14/12 10:40 PM adt adt lol

2/14/12 10:40 PM corvette_2007 adt sure‐‐‐‐will have to do that sometime

2/14/12 10:41 PM adt corvette_2007 lol2/14/12 10:41 PM adt corvette_2007 lol2/14/12 10:41 PM adt corvette_2007 meaning there really isnt much between us
Yahoo Chat Logs

Yahoo User4 ("adt")

Date/Time (Local) Sender Rexipient Message

2/14/12 10:41 PM adt corvette_2007 meaning there really isnt much between us

2/14/12 10:41 PM adt corvette_2007 lots a trees

2/14/12 10:41 PM adt corvette_2007 lots a trees

2/14/12 10:41 PM corvette_2007 adt you are correct

2/14/12 10:41 PM corvette_2007 adt pick a tree‐‐‐‐hehe