alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

Order 

June 1, 2018

157097

FAYTREON ONEE WEST,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 157097

COA: 335190

Wayne CC: 15-005357-NO

CITY OF DETROIT,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 12, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this 

order addressing: (1) whether strict or substantial compliance is required with the notice 

provision contained within MCL 691.1404(2), compare Rowland v Washtenaw County 

Road Commission, 477 Mich 197 (2007), with Plunkett v Dep’t of Transportation, 286 

Mich App 168 (2009); (2) whether the plaintiff’s notice failed to comply with MCL 

691.1404(2) under either a strict or substantial compliance standard; (3) whether the 

Legislature’s use of the word “shall” in MCL 691.1404(1) and the word “may” in MCL 

691.1404(2) indicates that service on an individual is not the only method of serving 

proper notice; and (4) whether an individual described in MCR 2.105(G)(2) can delegate 

the legal authority to accept lawful process under MCL 691.1404(2), see 1 Mich Civ Jur 

Agency § 1 (2018). In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electronically file an 

appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must 

provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall 

file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The 

appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use 

of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant 

within 14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit 

mere restatements of their application papers.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 1, 2018

d0529

2

Clerk

Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this 

case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

We further direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same 

future session of the Court when it will hear oral argument in Wigfall v City of Detroit

(Docket No. 156793).
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 99-630 

________________________________________________________________________ 

FISHERIES 

Pacific Salmon 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CANADA 

Relating to and Amending 

Annexes I and IV of the 

Treaty of January 28, 1985, as 

Amended 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington June 30, 1999 

with 

Attachments 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
CANADA 

Fisheries: Pacific Salmon 

 Agreement relating to and amending Annexes I and IV of 

 the treaty of January 28, 1985, as amended. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at Washington 

 June 30, 1999; 

 Entered into force June 30, 1999. 

 With attachments. 





















NOTE: Paragraph numbers after paragraph 3 appear to be out of sequence.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52600-52601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26574]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Scudder Spain and Portugal Fund, Inc., Common Stock, 
$0.01 Par Value) File No. 1-9719

October 1, 1997.
    Scudder Spain and Portugal Fund, Inc. (``Company'') has filed an 
application with Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), 
pursuant to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') and Rule 12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the 
above specified security (``Security'') from listing and registration 
on the American Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'' or ``Exchange'').
    The reasons cited in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    Pursuant to the rules of the Amex regarding de-listing, and in 
particular Rule 18 of the Amex, the Company has transmitted to the Amex 
a certified copy of resolutions adopted by its Board of Directors 
(``Board'') authorizing the withdrawal of the Security from listing on 
the Amex.
    The Board and management of the Company have determined that 
listing the Security on the New York Stock Exchange (``NYSE'') may 
provide potential benefits to the Company and the Company's 
stockholders, including increased market visibility and increased 
exposure of the Company among the financial community, and a potential 
for increased trading volume for the Security, which, if realized, 
could provide increased liquidity and a decrease in the discount in the 
market price of the Security as compared to the Company's net asset 
value per share of Security. The Company's Security began trading on 
the NYSE on July 30, 1997.
    By letter dated July 18, 1997, the Amex informed the Company that 
the Exchange would not object to the Company's filing of the 
application to be removed from listing and registration on the 
Exchange.
    Any interested person may, on or before October 23, 1997, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and

[[Page 52601]]

Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, 
facts bearing upon whether the application has been made in accordance 
with the rules of the exchange and what terms, if any, should be 
imposed by the Commission for the protection of investors. The 
Commission, based on the information submitted to it, will issue an 
order granting the application after the date mentioned above, unless 
the Commission determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26574 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EDWARD J. NICHOLAS, )

Plaintiff, )

) C.A. No. 06-210 Erie

v. )

) District Judge McLaughlin

SCOTT A. EVANS, et al., ) Magistrate Judge Baxter

Defendants. )

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I. RECOMMENDATION

It is respectfully recommended that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without prejudice

to Plaintiff’s right to pay the filing fee of $350.00 before October 23, 2006. 

II. REPORT

Plaintiff, an inmate incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Albion, presented

this civil rights complaint, along with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Section 804(g) of Pub.L. No. 104-134, enacted April 26, 1996, amended 28 U.S.C. §

1915 to provide:

[i]n no events shall a prisoner bring a civil action ... under this section if the

prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any

facility, brought an action or appeal in the court of the United States that was

dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger

of serious physical injury.

28 U.S.C. §1915(g).

Plaintiff has been a prolific advocate in this federal court. At least three of Plaintiff’s

prior lawsuits have been dismissed as legally frivolous: Civil Actions Numbers 06-98 Erie, 06-

112 Erie, and 06-201 Erie, all filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of

Pennsylvania. 

Case 1:06-cv-00210-SJM-SPB Document 4 Filed 10/03/06 Page 1 of 2
2

An indigent inmate may overcome the “Three Strikes Rule” if he can show that he is

under “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307

(3d Cir. 2001) (interpreting imminent danger). Plaintiff has not alleged such imminent danger.

Accordingly, Plaintiff must pay the full filing fee before October 23, 2006, or risk

dismissal of this action.

III. CONCLUSION

Because of these prior dismissals, and because Plaintiff has not alleged that he is in

imminent danger of serious physical injury, it is recommended that the complaint be dismissed

without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to pay the full filing fee of $350.00 to the Clerk of Courts

before October 23, 2006. 

In accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Local

Rule 72.1.4B, the parties are allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file written

objections to this report. Any party opposing the objections shall have seven (7) days from the

date of service of objections to respond thereto. Failure to timely file objections may constitute

a waiver of any appellate rights.

S/ Susan Paradise Baxter

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: October 3, 2006

Case 1:06-cv-00210-SJM-SPB Document 4 Filed 10/03/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection  with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Elite
Information Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) for the three month period ended August
31, 2009 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on
the date  hereof  (the “Report”),  I, Li Kin
Shing, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
  
 
 Date:  October
      15, 2009
              By
              /s/
      Li Kin ShingLi
      Kin ShingPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700300

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

ZACKERY E. RIBEIRO

Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Commander William Weiland, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commander, Navy Region Mid-Atlantic, 

Norfolk, VA.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Commander I.C. Lemoyne, 

JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Lieutenant R. Andrew Austria, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 12 July 2018

_________________________

Before HUTCHISON, FULTON, and SAYEGH, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

The supplemental court-martial order will reflect that the appellant is 

entitled to 134 days of pretrial confinement credit.

 For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
#### Jack J. JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2624.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 8, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 17, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT  OF  OPERATIONS  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         270,295
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,736,955
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,000
<INVENTORY>                                    465,038
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,730,282
<PP&E>                                       7,472,526
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,202,152
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,938,889
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,962,127
<BONDS>                                      5,720,247
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,329
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,178,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,938,889
<SALES>                                     13,167,993
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,167,993
<CGS>                                        9,923,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,923,890
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,603,156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             515,038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (874,091)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (874,091)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (874,091)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Annual Report of SureWest Communications (the “Company”),on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: March 12, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Steven C. Oldham    |   |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Steven C. Oldham,       |
|                 |   | President and           |
|                 |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to SureWest Communications and will be retained by SureWestCommunications and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

Theforegoing certificate is being furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed aspart of the Form 10-K.

----
```

[104th Congress Private Law 3]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl0003.104]

[[Page 1]]

Private Law 104-3
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 For the relief of Oscar Salas-Velazquez. <<NOTE:  Oct. 9, 1996 -  [H.R. 
                                1031]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF GROUNDS FOR DISAPPROVAL OF REQUESTS FOR 
            CLASSIFICATION AND ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.

    (a) <<NOTE: Jennifer Christine Brady.>> In General.--Notwithstanding 
section 204(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Attorney 
General may not disapprove a petition for classification of Oscar Salas-
Velazquez under section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of such Act, or an application 
for adjustment of the status of Oscar Salas-Velazquez under section 245 
of such Act, on any ground relating to a determination that the marriage 
of Oscar Salas-Velazquez and Jennifer Christine Brady was entered into 
for the purpose of evading the immigration laws.

    (b) Waiver of Inadmissibility.--Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A), 
(B), and (C) of section 212(a)(6) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act, Oscar Salas-Velazquez may not be considered to be within a class of 
excludable aliens at any time on or after the date of the enactment of 
this Act on any ground relating to--
            (1) a determination that the marriage of Oscar Salas-
        Velazquez and Jennifer Christine Brady was entered into for the 
        purpose of evading the immigration laws; or
            (2) the deportation of Oscar Salas-Velazquez on February 9, 
        1995.

    (c) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Oscar Salas-
Velazquez shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Oscar Salas-Velazquez, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, for 
the current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide level of 
family-sponsored immigrants under section 201(c)(1)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act.

  Approved October 9, 1996.
```
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Company's registration
statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-41494) of our report dated April 30, 1997 on
our audits of the financial statements and financial statement schedule as of
January 31, 1997 and 1996 and July 31, 1995 and for the year ended January 31,
1997, the six month period ended January 31, 1996 and each of the two years in
the period ended July 31, 1995, which report is included in this annual report
on Form 10-K.
 
                                          Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
 
Houston, Texas
May 1, 1997
Revised RTR preamble & rule 

Penny Lassiter to: Higgins, Cortney 03/30/2011 04:11 PM

Cc: Mary Kissell, Ann Johnson

Cortney,

Attached please find a clean and a redline version. I am sending a redline so that you can see:

1. Where we made changes to 2 responses to comments on Marine Tank Vessels and one response to 

comment on P&R I where OGC felt the responses in the previous version you saw were not clear.

2. The rule text we accidentally omitted to add a new paragraph (n) in section 63.567 of the Marine 

Vessel Loading subpart Y. You already have seen the other rule text language for subpart Y

3. Where we made some editorial and format cleanups of the package.

Penny Lassiter

Group Leader

Refining and Chemicals Group (D205-01)

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. EPA

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541-5396
#### James W. PRYOR v. Carolyn M. PRYOR (Wenzel).

No. 50669.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 16, 1978.

Tubb, Stevens & Morrison, T. Murray Tubb, Thomas J. Tubb, West Point, for appellant.

Joe 0. Sams, Jr., Columbus, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J), and BROOM and COFER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
p.1 

OAR Box 1415 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

9) IV-E-9 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/15/2008 9:38:25 AM Sheet 9 of 130 
P.2 

J.3X5^»J.6XUt« ,p l^-l*"*'

 vv ** 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Company: 

Contact Report 

Kenneth R. Meardon 

Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PBS) 

March 20,2002 

Mr. Kurt Anderson, Director EH&S 

Monaco Coach Corporation, Wakaruga, IN 

Telephone Number: (219)862-7347 

Fax Number: (219)862-7313 

r 

EPA AIR DOCKET 

Contact Summary: 

I contacted Mr. Anderson to determine if their facility uses unfilled resins or filled resins. 

Mr, Anderson indicated that they use unfilled resins. Mr. Anderson also noted that their facility 

opened two years ago as a Section 112(g) facility meeting pnemMACT level of control. He 

indicated that this is why the emissions from the facility are so low. 

&K**4^ 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE: t#, ($iU~-— ShJilm^ 

ease enter name and date1

(Please enter name and date) ! /
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3060 

To establish a Youth Mental Health Research Initiative in the National 

Institutes of Health for purposes of encouraging collaborative research 

to improve youth mental health. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2023 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mrs. BRITT) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To establish a Youth Mental Health Research Initiative in 

the National Institutes of Health for purposes of encouraging collaborative research to improve youth mental 

health. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Youth Mental Health 

5 Research Act’’. 

2 

•S 3060 IS

1 SEC. 2. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH ON YOUTH MENTAL 

2 HEALTH. 

3 Part B of title IV of the Public Health Service Act 

4 (42 U.S.C. 284 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 409K. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH ON YOUTH MEN7 TAL HEALTH. 

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Director of NIH shall estab9 lish a Youth Mental Health Research Initiative, to be led 

10 by the Director of the National Institute of Mental Health, 

11 in collaboration with the Director of the Eunice Kennedy 

12 Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human 

13 Development and the Director of the National Institute 

14 on Minority Health and Health Disparities, to coordinate 

15 and encourage collaboration among the national research 

16 institutes and national centers with respect to funda17 mental and applied research on youth mental health, in18 cluding— 

19 ‘‘(1) social, behavioral, cognitive, and develop20 mental research, to build resilience, increase the ca21 pacity of communities to identify and care for youth 

22 at risk or in crisis; and 

23 ‘‘(2) research to improve the targeting and de24 livery of mental health interventions in clinical and 

25 community settings where youth live, play, work, 

26 and learn. 

3 

•S 3060 IS

1 ‘‘(b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

2 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

3 $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 

4 2028.’’. 

Æ