USA Banner
  U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Here's how you knowOfficial US Government Icon
              **Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
            Secure Site Icon
              **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
 U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation
 Search DOT
            Search
                    About FHWAFHWA Organization
                Headquarters Offices
                Field Offices
                Strategic Plan
                Business Opportunities
                Staff Directories
                Careers
                Highway History
                Contact UsProgramsAcquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                Safety
                Browse by TopicsResourcesCore Highway Topics
                Federal Aid Essentials
                Automation
                Complete Streets
                Laws and Regulations
                Policy & Guidance Center
                Section 508
                Publications and Statistics
                Professional Development
                National Highway Institute
                Resource Center
                Accessibility Resource Library
                FHWA Research LibraryNewsroomPress Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Photos
                Videos
                Media ContactsMenu FHWA Highway Safety Programs Home
                        Safety
                        Roadway Departure Safety
                        Reduce Crash Severity
                        Hardware Eligibility Letters


            
            In This Section
        Roadway Departure Safety
                Strategic Approach
                                Strategic Plan
                Crash Emphasis Brochures
                Focused Approach
                Noteworthy Practices
                Partner Resources
                Keep Vehicles on the Road
                                Pavement Friction
                Horizontal Curve Safety
                Rumble Strips and Rumble Stripes
                Nighttime Visibility
                Provide for a Safe Recovery
                                SafetyEdge
                Clear Zones
                Reduce Crash Severity
                                Overview
                Hardware Eligibility Letters
                Focus on Reducing Rural Roadway Departures (FoRRRwD)
                                Overview
                All Public Roads
                Proven Countermeasures
                Systemic Approach
                Safety Action Plans
                FoRRRwD Resources
                
                Safety Eligibility Letter B-235
  
  **Hardware Type:**
            Longitudinal Barriers and Bridge Rails
                          **Code:**
            B-235
                          **Date:**
            07/09/2012
                          **Testing Criteria:**
            NCHRP 350
                          **Manufacturer:**
            CalTrans
                          **Device Description:**
            Caltrans Low Profile Reinforced Concrete Barrier
                          **View PDF:**
            b235.pdf (1.22 MB)
    
    Safety Eligibility Letter B-235


						
**Download Version**PDF [1.05 MB]

DOT logoU.S. Department of Transportation**Federal Highway Administration**

			1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E.Washington, D.C. 20590

July 9, 2012
In Reply Refer To: 
  HSST/B-235
Mr. Vue Her
  Transportation Engineer
  Office of Roadside Safety and Cooperative Research
  Division of Research and Innovation
  California Department of Transportation
  5900 Folsom Blvd., MS-5
  Sacramento, California   95819
Dear Mr. Her:
This letter is in response to your request for the Federal  Highway Administration (FHWA) to review a roadside safety system for  eligibility for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway program.

Name of system:

 	 California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) 
  Low-Profile  Reinforced Concrete BarrierType of system:

 	 Permanent Longitudinal BarrierTest Level:

 	 NCHRP 350 Test Level 2 (TL-2)Testing conducted by:
  	  
  	  CalTrans Roadside Safety Research GroupTask Force 13 Designator:
  	  SGR45Date of request:
  	  November 16, 2010Date initially acknowledged:
  	  November 16, 2010Date of completed package:
  	  May 1, 2012**Decision:**
  The following device is eligible, with details provided as  attached as an integral part of this letter:
CalTrans TL-2 Low-Profile Reinforced Concrete BarrierBased on a review of crash test results submitted by the  manufacturer certifying the device described herein meets the crashworthiness  criteria of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report  350, the device is eligible for reimbursement under the Federal-aid highway  program.  Eligibility for reimbursement  under the Federal-aid highway program does not establish approval or  endorsement by the FHWA for any particular purpose or use.
The FHWA, the Department of Transportation, and the United  States Government do not endorse products or services and the issuance of a  reimbursement eligibility letter is not an endorsement of any product or  service.
**Requirements**
To be found eligible for Federal-aid funding, roadside  safety devices should meet the crash test and evaluation criteria contained in  the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 or the American Association of State Highway and Transportation  Officials’ Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH).
**Description**
  The  low-profile barrier test article was constructed at the Caltrans Dynamic Test  Facility. The
  test  article was 30.48 m (100 feet) long with a nominal height of 0.4572 m (18  inches).  It
  consisted  of a 0.305 m (12 inch) deep foundation, a 0.105 m (6 inch) curb, with nine  0.305 m (12
  inch)  posts spaced at 3.048 m (10 feet) on center, and a 3x8x3/8 inch structural steel  rail.
  Because  existing soils were non-homogeneous due to an assortment of previous projects  at the construction location, a 2.44 x 0.61 x 30.48 meter (8 x 2 x 100 feet)  soil bed was excavated then backfilled with soil from a local gravel provider.  The soil analysis of the fill soil was  completed by the Caltrans Geotechnical Lab and classified as fine sandy silt.  At a 90% relative compaction and an optimum  moisture content of 12.3%, the maximum dry density was 114.6 pcf.  Upon completion of the excavation, the bed was  filled with soil, 0.1016 meters to 0.1524 meters (4inches to 6inches) per  lift.  Each lift was moisture-conditioned  and compacted using a vibratory roller.  After  the bed was completely filled and compacted, a nuclear gauge was used to test  the compaction.  The minimum relative  compaction required was 90% under Caltrans 2006 Standard Specifications.  A 93% relative compaction was achieved with a  density of 122.4 pcf.  The low-profile  barrier was constructed and installed in two phases: pouring of the footing and  attachment of the rail.  The soil was  re-excavated 1.016 meters x 0.3048 meter x 30.48 meters (3.3 feet x 1 foot x  100 feet) to install the footing of the barrier.  The footing and the curb were constructed in  one pour.
The  footing was 30.48 m (100 feet) long and had 9 posts spaced 3.048 m (10 feet) on  center.
  The rail came in 4 pieces and spanned 30.48 m (100 feet).
Once  the formwork for the footing was complete, the reinforcing steel and anchor  bolts were
  positioned  and tied in.  Concrete was then poured  into the formwork while being consolidated with a concrete vibrator.  All exposed steel components were galvanized  from the manufacturer prior to installation. The footing was placed on December  4, 2009.  The posts and rails were installed  on December 15, 2009. Because of the timing of the pour and when staff was  available to test the compressive strength of the concrete, the 28-day test  could not be conducted.  Instead, the  compressive strength was tested at 31 days and was determined to be 40.6 MPa  (5890 psi).
The  adjacent pavement elevation varied along the length of the low-profile barrier.   Thus the  height of the barrier ranged from 0.4572 to 0.4826 meters  (18 inches to 19 inches).
Design details are provided as enclosure to this  correspondence.
**Summary and Standard Provisions**
  The low-profile barrier was crashed test in accordance  with NCHRP Report 350 evaluation criteria.
Test  701 was tested at NCHRP Test Level 2 (Test 2-11). The vehicle tracked smoothly  into the barrier, impacting 400 millimeters (15.75 inches) downstream of the  5th barrier post. The front tire (red) made contact with the sleeve of the rail  530 millimeters (20.8 inches) downstream of the center of the post.  The rear tire (green) made contact 1430 millimeters  (56.3 inches) downstream of the post. The vehicle lost contact with the barrier  at 0.412 seconds after impact. The impact speed and angle were 70.2 km/h and  25.3°, respectively.  The exit speed and  angle were 62.3 km/h and 7.8°, respectively.  The vehicle remained upright during and after  the impact and vehicle stability was considered satisfactory. Occupant risk  factors satisfied the test criteria and the vehicle exit trajectory remained  within acceptable limits.
**Findings**
  Test  702 was performed at NCHRP Report 350 Test Level 2 (2-10). The vehicle tracked  smoothly into the barrier. The front tire (red) made contact 1260 millimeters  (49.6 inches) upstream of the 3rd barrier post.  The rear tire (green) made contact 630  millimeters (24.8 inches) downstream of the post.  The vehicle lost contact with the barrier at  0.364 seconds after impact.  The impact  speed and angle were 70.8 km/h and 21°, respectively. The exit speed and angle  were 63.1 km/h and 9.6°.  The vehicle  remained upright during and after the impact and vehicle stability was  considered satisfactory.  Occupant risk  factors satisfied the test criteria and the vehicle exit trajectory remained  within acceptable limits.****
  Therefore, the system described and detailed in the  attached form is eligible for reimbursement and may be installed under the  range of conditions tested.
Please note the following standard provisions that apply  to FHWA eligibility letters:
This letter provides a AASHTO/ARTBA/AGC Task Force 13 designator that should be used for the purpose of the creation of a new and/or the update of existing Task Force 13 drawing for posting on the on-line ‘Guide to Standardized Highway Barrier Hardware’ currently referenced in AASHTO Roadside Design Guide.
  This finding of eligibility does not cover other structural features of the systems, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
  Any changes that may influence system conformance with NCHRP Report 350 criteria will require a new reimbursement eligibility letter.
  Should the FHWA discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in-service performance reveals safety problems, or that the system is significantly different from the version that was crash tested, we reserve the right to modify or revoke this letter.
  You are expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design and installation requirements to ensure proper performance.
  You are expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has the same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for review, and that it will meet the crash test and evaluation criteria of the NCHRP Report 350.
  To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of eligibility is designated as number B-235 and shall not be reproduced except in full.  This letter and the test documentation upon which it is based are public information.  All such letters and documentation may be reviewed at our office upon request.
  This letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to use, manufacture, or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent holder.  The FHWA does not become involved in issues concerning patent law.  Patent issues, if any, are to be resolved by the applicant.
  CalTrans Low-Profile Reinforced Concrete Barrier is  considered a generic barrierSincerely yours,
  
  */* Signature of Michael S. Griffith */*
  
  Michael S. Griffith
 Director, Office of Safety Technologies
 Office of SafetyEnclosures U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Highway Administration**

1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE

WASHINGTON, DC 20590

202-366-4000Subscribe to email updates
                    About
  

        
              About FHWA
                Careers
                Org Chart
                Staff Directories
                Work with UsPrograms
  

        
              Acquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                SafetyPolicies, Rights, Legal
  

        
              About DOT
                Accessibility
                Budget and Performance
                Civil Rights
                FOIA
                Information Quality
                No FEAR Act
                Office of Inspector General
                Privacy Policy
                USA.gov
                Web Policies and Notices
                Web StandardsNews & Events
  

        
              Newsroom
                Press Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Media Contacts
                Connect with Us