alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-48692 and 333-26117 on Form S-8of our report dated March 19, 2004 relating to the consolidated financialstatements of Poore Brothers, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 27, 2003 andDecember 28, 2002, and for the two years ended December 27, 2003 (which reportexpresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relatingto the application of procedures relating to certain disclosures andreclassifications of financial statement amounts related to the 2001 financialstatements that were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations andfor which we have expressed no opinion or other form of assurance other thanwith respect to such disclosures and reclassifications, and an explanatoryparagraph relating to the change in the method of accounting for goodwill andother intangible assets with indefinite lives as required by the Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”,which was effective January 1, 2002), appearing in this Annual Report on Form10-K of Poore Brothers, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 27,2003.

 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Phoenix, Arizona

March 22, 2004

 

----
#### Vernon Junior WALLACE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-531.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 28, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 1971.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Milton E. McKay, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Rodney Durrance, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs, the record on appeal and the oral argument, we are of the opinion that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The final judgment from which this appeal is taken is, therefore, affirmed. See Cornelius v. State, Fla.1950, 49 So.2d 332, and Beard v. State, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 680.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., MAGER, J., and Mc-LANE, RALPH M., Associate Judge, concur.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: | December                6, 2007 | By:                  /s/ E. Larry                Ryder                                             E.                  Larry Ryder        Executive                  Vice President - Finance                  and        Administration and                  Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
|-------|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of RPM Advantage.
(the "Registrant") for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David R. Pressler, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:   July 15, 2011


By:

/s/ DAVID R. PRESSLER


David R. Pressler
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
# WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE Legislative Rule-Making Review Committee
SenatorHerb Snyder. C~Chair Delegore MerhoPoore, Cc-Chair Debra A. Crahrlm, Chip/Counsel Jared Wyricli. kgirlotireAnalyst Mark W5itc. LtgisI~1riw Analyst Thn Hanky, Commincr Clerk 

# C-""=
,.,



# --- ' "'-8," 

## ~r:~- 

# ,,,,:c i :.,-iJi,.sA 

# SEC;rTr,pcp 

# 3T~~ Counsel Brian Skinner. Asrociutc Counsel

Kevin Baker. Associate Counsel Robcn NTlliams, Associate Counrel JqffJohnron. Associate Counsel SarahSlewan, Associ(1Ie Counsel Brandon Hafleld, Associate Counsel September 11.2014 NOTlCE OF ACTION TAKEN BY THE LEGISLATIVE RULE-MAKING REVIEW COMMITTEE TO: Natalie E. Tennant, Secretary of State. State Register TO: KristinA. Boggs DEP -Air Quality 601 57th Street. SE Charleston, WV 25304
FROM: Legislative Rule-Making Committee Proposed Rule: Requirementsfor Operating Permits. 45CSR30 The Legislative Rule-Making Review Committee Recommends that the West Virginia Legislature 

### 1. Authorize the agency to promulgate the Legislative rule: (A) as originally filed 

### X (B) as modified by the agency 2. Authorize the agency to promulgatethe Legislative rule with certain amendments; amendments and a statement of reasons for such recommendationis attached. 

### 3. Authorizethe agency to promulgate the Legislative rule as modified with certain amendments; amendments and a statement of reasons for such recommendation is attached.
4. Recommends that the Legislature rule be withdrawn; a statement of reasons for the recommendationis attached.

Building 1, Room MB49 I900 Kunuwhn Boulevard, East Chururlesron 

## ,W25305 Phone: (304)3474840 Fax: (304)3474901 entail: debru.gruhum~'wvlegkIur~re.gov : jured.~ric~wvsenute.gov
255 La. 819

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. James DUNN v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 50461.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 3, 1970.

In re: James Dunn applying for writ of habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the relief sought.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26346]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Statement of Organization, Functions and Delegations of Authority

    Notice is hereby given that I delegate to the Assistant Secretary 
for Children and Families, with authority to redelegate, the following 
authorities vested in the Secretary under the Personal Responsibility 
and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, P.L. 104-193, as 
amended now and hereafter.
    (a) Authorities Delegated:
    (1) Authority to administer the provisions of Title I, Block Grants 
for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) under Sections 101-
103, 106-110, 112, 115 and 116 of the Personal Responsibility and Work 
Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, 42 U.S.C. 1305 note, 42 U.S.C. 
601 et seq., and as amended now and hereafter. In addition, in 
exercising authority under Section 103, ``Section 413, Research, 
Evaluations, and National Studies,'' of the Social Security Act, the 
Administration for Children and Families is expected to consult with 
the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation.
    (2) Authority to administer the provisions of the Child Care and 
Development Block Grant Amendments of 1996, 42 U.S.C. 9801 note, under 
Sections 601-615 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 
Reconciliation Act of 1996, 42 U.S.C. 1305 note, 42 U.S.C. 601 et seq., 
and as amended now and hereafter.
    (b) Effect on existing delegations. None.
    These delegations shall be exercised under the Department's 
existing delegation of authority and policy on regulations. These 
delegations of authority are effective upon date of signature. In 
addition, I hereby, affirm and ratify any actions taken by the 
Assistant Secretary for Children and Families or any other 
Administration for Children and Families official which, in effect, 
involved the exercise of these authorities prior to the effective date 
of these delegations.

    Dated: September 16, 1997.
Donna E. Shalala,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26346 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Argued September 18, 2013

Decided September 20, 2013

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER Circuit Judge

No. 13

‐ 1432

M ACNEIL A UTOMOTIVE P RODUCTS

L IMITED

, Plaintiff

‐ Appellee

,

v.

C ANNON A UTOMOTIVE L IMITED

, et al.

, Defendants

‐ Appellants

. Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern

District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 08 C 139

J oan B. Gottschall, Judge

.

O R D E R

The plaintiff sued the defendants, affiliated U.K. companies that we’ll call

Cannon, under the alienage branch of diversity jurisdiction, in 2008, charging breach of

contract and related wrongs. The primary defendant is Cannon Automotive Limited,

the company with which MacNeil had its contract; but the plaintiffs contend that the

two Cannon affiliates that are the other defendants will, if MacNeil obtains a judgment NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1Page 2 No. 13

‐ 1432

that Cannon Automotive can’t pay, be liable under veil

‐ piercing or related doctrines of

derivative liability of affiliates of a primary defendant.

Recently the defendants brought suit against MacNeil in a U.K. court, seeking a

declaration that the affiliates will not be liable for any judgment that MacNeil may

obtain against Cannon Automotive in the present suit. The district court issued a

preliminary injunction against proceedings in the U.K. suit, and the three Cannon

companies have appealed.

At argument we suggested to counsel that proceedings, whether in the U.K. or in

the federal district court in Chicago, concerned with the potential liability of the

affiliates, were premature. If MacNeil obtains no judgment, the liability of the affiliates

will be moot. So too if MacNeil obtains a judgment that Cannon Automotive can pay. If

MacNeil obtains a judgment and Cannon Automotive cannot pay it, MacNeil will

doubtless commence collection proceedings of some sort against the affiliates. To

commence those proceedings, whether in the U.K. or in the United States, before the

district court renders a judgment on the merits would therefore be premature, and

should be postponed until such a judgment is rendered.

Counsel for both parties agreed with our suggestion. We therefore affirm the

district court, emphasizing however that the injunction it issued is merely preliminary,

and will have to be reexamined when and if the case moves into the collection stage.

But in accordance with the parties’ agreement, we direct the district judge to postpone

proceedings in its court against the Cannon affiliates until final judgment is rendered on

the claims against Cannon Automotive. Whether discovery relating to collection should

be allowed before then we leave to the discretion of the district court. We also urge the

court to expedite the litigation, which has made little progress in the five years since it

was commenced.

A FFIRMED

.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1892 

To amend Public Law 107–153 to modify a certain date. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2005 

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself and Mr. DORGAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend Public Law 107–153 to modify a certain date. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SETTLEMENT OF TRIBAL CLAIMS. 

4 Section 1(a) of Public Law 107–153 (25 U.S.C. 4044 

5 note; 116 Stat. 79) is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 

6 1999’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2005’’. 

Æ
Osbaldo A. Saenz Sr., Estela G. Saenz Trust by and through

its trustee Esther A.S. Salmon

and the Estate of Alfredo G.



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 3, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00040

- CV

Osbaldo A. SAENZ

, Jr., Appellant

v.

Osbaldo A. SAENZ

, Sr., Estela G. Saenz

, Trust by an d through its T rustee Esther A.S. Salmon

and the Estate of Alfredo G. Tijerina and Estella Tijerina,

Appellee s

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC

- 12

- 520 Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On January 28 , 2014 , the district clerk filed a notification of late record stating that the

clerk’s record has not be en filed because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the

fee.

Accordingly , it is ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements h ave been made to pay the cle rk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. If appellant fail s to respond within the time provided, this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court o n this 3rd day of February, 2 014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       8,179,496
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,677
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    287,802
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,574,194
<PP&E>                                      17,707,468
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,632,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,421,502
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,037,012
<BONDS>                                      4,744,216
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,057
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,970,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,421,502
<SALES>                                        726,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,631,809
<CGS>                                          440,759
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  988,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,532,573
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,305,549
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (15,888,928)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (15,888,928)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements included in this report and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          81,771                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,717,313                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,375,562                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,242,831                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,959,678                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 990,000                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,575,505                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,176,620                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          500,000                       0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,171                       0
<COMMON>                                         2,175                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,007,194)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                      3,139,862               3,076,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,139,862               3,076,866
<CGS>                                        2,318,378               2,343,938
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,318,378               2,343,938
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               624,837                 541,865
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             131,364                 102,129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                353,286               (464,011)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,700                  32,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,313                  56,734
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,313                  56,734
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01                    0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01                    0.01



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.17

                            CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION

                                       OF

                           CAPITAL ONE CAPITAL II, LLC


     This Certificate of Formation of Capital One Capital II, LLC (the
"Company"), dated as of January 23, 2002, has been duly executed and is being
filed by Bernard J. Kelley, as an authorized person, to form a limited liability
company under the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (6 Del. C. (S)18-101,
                                                            -------
et seq.), as amended from time to time.
-- ---

     FIRST. The name of the limited liability company formed hereby is Capital
One Capital II, LLC.

     SECOND. The address of the registered office of the Company in the State of
Delaware is c/o The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209
Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware 19801.

     THIRD. The name and address of the registered agent for service of process
on the Company in the State of Delaware are The Corporation Trust Company,
Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle County,
Delaware 19801.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned authorized person has executed this
Certificate of Formation as of the date first above written.


                                         /s/ Bernard J. Kelley
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Name: Bernard J. Kelley
                                        Authorized Person
EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Smooth Global (China)
Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that:




1.           The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30,
2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
      November 13, 2009
            By:
      /s/ Zheng
      ShuyingZheng
      Shuying, Chief Executive Officerand
      Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133299 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133299 COA: 264416 Wayne CC: 05-002483-01 JOSEPH TATE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk