alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Alan Margerison, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

   b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)];
      and

   c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2005                      /s/ Alan Margerison
                                        Alan Margerison
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STANLEY PRINCE, :

:

Plaintiff, : Case No. 06-CV-1565

:

v. :

:

PEERLESS INSURANCE CO., : (Judge McClure)

A New Hampshire Corporation, :

:

Defendant :

O R D E R

November 29, 2006

BACKGROUND:

On June 7, 2006, plaintiff commenced this action by filing a writ of

summons with the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County, Pennsylvania. 

Defendant was served with a complaint on July 26, 2006. On August 11, 2006,

defendant, a New Hampshire corporation, filed a notice of removal of the action to

the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1441. The case arises out of a fire that occurred in Jersey Shore,

Pennsylvania. The plaintiff is the owner of the premises and filed an insurance

claim following the fire. 

The parties are now conducting discovery and as part of that discovery, the

Case 4:06-cv-01565-JFM Document 12 Filed 11/29/06 Page 1 of 3
2

defendant has requested an inspection of the premises. On November 13, 2006,

defendant filed a “Motion for Inspection of Premises.” (Rec. Doc. No. 11-1). 

Evidently, the two parties attempted to schedule the inspection, but based on the

filing of the present motion, it appears that they were unable to do so. No brief

was filed in support of this motion. For the following reasons, we will deem this

motion withdrawn.

DISCUSSION:

Local Rule 7.5 of the Middle District of Pennsylvania requires a supporting

brief to be filed within ten days of the filing of any pretrial motion. The rule

further states that if a supporting is not filed within ten days, the motion shall be

deemed to be withdrawn, unless the motion is for an enlargement of time,

appointment of counsel, or the motion has concurrence of all counsel. Id.

In the present case, ten days have passed since the filing of defendant’s

motion. Although defendant’s motion claims that “no objection has been made to

the requested inspection,” the defendant has not filed a certificate of concurrence. 

Furthermore, this is the type of motion that if the plaintiff did in fact concur, there

would be no reason for the court to be involved. Therefore, the court will deem the

motion to be withdrawn pursuant to Local Rule 7.5.

Case 4:06-cv-01565-JFM Document 12 Filed 11/29/06 Page 2 of 3
3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

Defendant’s “Motion for Inspection of Premises” is withdrawn. (Rec. Doc.

No. 11-1).

 s/ James F. McClure, Jr. 

James F. McClure, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-01565-JFM Document 12 Filed 11/29/06 Page 3 of 3
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

The Gold Room, Inc. :

:

v. : No. 1656 C.D. 2019

:

Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, :

Appellant :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 3

rd day of February, 2021, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

the above-captioned opinion filed December 16, 2020, shall be designated 

OPINION rather than MEMORANDUM OPINION and it shall be reported.

_____________________________________

ELLEN CEISLER, Judge
Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 1 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 2 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 3 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 4 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 5 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 6 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 7 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 8 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 9 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 10 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 11 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 12 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 13 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 14 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 15 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 16 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 17 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 18 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 19 of 20

Case 1:06-cv-00091-MBC   Document 18   Filed 08/29/06   Page 20 of 20
#### Samuel ST. CLAIR and Rachel St. Clair, his wife, Appellants, v. CITY OF DUNEDIN et al., Appellees.

No. 69-669.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 4, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
1

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EDWARD J. NICHOLS, )

Petitioner, )

v. ) C.A. No. 06-113 Erie

) District Judge McLaughlin

MARILYN BROOKS, et al., ) Magistrate Judge Baxter

Respondents )

O R D E R

On May 15, 2006, Petitioner, a state prisoner appearing pro se, filed the instant petition

for writ of habeas corpus. This matter was assigned to United States District Judge Sean J.

McLaughlin and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and

Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

On May 22, 2006, Magistrate Judge Baxter issued a Report and Recommendation

recommending that this case be transferred to the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Document #

3.

No objections have been filed.

AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2006;

Following a de novo review of the record in this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

the Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Baxter on May 22, 2006 is

adopted as the opinion of this Court. This case is hereby transferred to the Middle District of

Pennsylvania. 

Case 1:06-cv-00113-SJM-SPB Document 6 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 2
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Courts close this case. Although motions

are presently pending in this case, the transferee court is in the best position to decide them.

S/ Sean J. McLaughlin 

SEAN J. MCLAUGHLIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00113-SJM-SPB Document 6 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 2
December 6, 2001


Scott R. Gershon
c/o Intercallnet, Inc.
6340 NW 5th Way
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309


Re:  Short Term Loan


Dear Mr. Gershon;


Please accept this letter as the official terms and conditions surrounding the
temporary loan between you and Intercallnet, Inc. (the "Company"). You have
agreed to loan to the Company an amount equal to $23,720.74 for payment of the
November 2001 rent for the Cypress Creek facility. Interest shall accrue at a
rate of prime plus 2%, per annum, to be calculated over the time period that
such temporary loan is outstanding.

When the Company's cash flow is sufficient, the total amount of the temporary
loan (including accrued interest) will be reviewed and the repayment terms will
be determined as either lump sum repayment or scheduled payments over a specific
time period depending on the financial condition of the Company.








Sincerely,                                        Accepted By:

/s/ George A. Pacinelli                           Scott R. Gershon
---------------------------                       --------------------------
George A. Pacinelli                               Scott R. Gershon
President                                         Chief Executive Officer
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 07019 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** 

### x 07019\07019_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 07019\07019_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### x 07019\07019_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07019\07019_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07019\07019_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07019\07019_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07019\07019_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 07019\Supplemental Documents\07019_Asbury Plant aerial with info Map 1.jpg Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 07019\Supplemental Documents\07019_Asbury Plant aerial with info Map 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 07019\Supplemental Documents\07019_Asbury Plant aerial with info Map 1.psd Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07019\Supplemental Documents\07019_Asbury Plant aerial with info Map 2.jpg Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07019\Supplemental Documents\07019_Asbury Plant aerial with info Map 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07019\Supplemental Documents\07019_Asbury Plant aerial with info Map 2.psd Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07019\Supplemental Documents\07019_Part A - Section 5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07019\Supplemental Documents\07019_Part D - Question 4.3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
#### Edmund WEISLO and Marie E. Weislo, his wife, Appellants, v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF MARTIN COUNTY, a United States corporation, Theodore R. De Vary and Lida L. De Vary, his wife, also known as Lida L. Menninger, a free agent, and Gerald Solomon and Theodora Solomon, his wife, Appellees.

No. 2534.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 21, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 2, 1970.

Elton H. Schwarz, Stuart, for appellants.

Larry E. Buchanan, of Heiman & Crary, Stuart, for appellee-First Federal.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Reasoner v. Fisikelli, 1934, 114 Fla. 102, 153 So. 98, and Roberts v. Bass, Fla.App.1959, 111 So.2d 455.

McCAIN and OWEN, JJ-, and DRIVER, B. J., Associate Judge, concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR






RULE
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,






AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the quarterly report of Pangea Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Scott Duncan, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      November 14, 2008
            By: /s/
      Scott
      DuncanScott
      DuncanChief
      Financial Officer andPrincipal
      Financial Officer
```

[104th Congress Public Law 80]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ80.104]

[[Page 109 STAT. 794]]

[[Page 109 STAT. 794]]

Public Law 104-80
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 800 Market Street 
  in Knoxville, Tennessee, as the ``Howard H. Baker, Jr. United States 
          Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Dec. 28, 1995 -  [H.R. 2547]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 800 Market Street in 
Knoxville, Tennessee, shall be known and designated as the ``Howard H. 
Baker, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Howard H. Baker, 
Jr. United States Courthouse''.

    Approved December 28, 1995.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2547 (S. 1388):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-417 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):
            Dec. 18, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 20, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, James A. Prestiano, the President and sole officer of Voyer One, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002, to which this certification accompanies (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(b) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 19, 2002


                                              /s/ James A. Prestiano
                                              ------------------------------
                                              James A. Prestiano, President
Amendment to Offer Letter



 
EXHIBIT 10.41

 
January 24, 2003

 
Kevin Kennedy 
1400 Seaport Boulevard 
Redwood City, CA 94063 
 
Re: Amendment to Offer Letter 
 
Dear Kevin: 
 
This
letter amends your employment letter agreement between you and Openwave Systems Inc. (the “Company”) dated August 28, 2001 (the “Original Employment Letter”), and memorializes that to which we previously agreed. As we previously
agreed, the terms set forth below are effective as of October 1, 2002. 
 
Provided you are employed as a regular full time employee on September 30, 2003, and that you achieve mutually agreed upon Company financial performance objectives established by the CEO in consultation with the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors, you will receive a one-time bonus payment of $500,000 (the “Performance Bonus”). If your employment is terminated without Cause prior to September 30, 2003, notwithstanding any other severance benefits
to which you are entitled, the Company shall pay to you the Performance bonus to the extent not yet paid, promptly following such termination. As used herein, “Cause” means: (i) gross negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of
your duties to the Company; (ii) repeated unexplained or unjustified absences from the Company; (iii) a material and willful violation of any federal or state law which if made public would injure the business or reputation of the Company as
reasonably determined by the Board of Directors of the Company; (iv) refusal or willful failure to act in accordance with any specific lawful direction or order of the Company or stated written policy of the Company; (v) commission of any act of
fraud with respect to the Company; or (vi) conviction of a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude causing material harm to the standing and reputation of the Company, in each case as reasonably determined by the Board of Directors of the
Company. 
 
You should be aware that your employment with the
Company is for no specified period and constitutes “at will” employment. As a result, you are free to resign at any time, for any reason or for no reason. Similarly, the Company is free to conclude its employment relationship with you at
any time, with or without cause, subject to the severance obligations under this letter and any other applicable agreements and policies in effect. 
 
In consideration of the foregoing, you hereby reconfirm your obligations under the Confidentiality and Invention Assignment Agreement dated October 12,
2001. Except as otherwise provided herein, the terms and conditions of your Original Employment Letter shall remain in effect. 
 
Please review these terms to make sure they are consistent with your understanding. If so, please return the original signed letter to Tim Silvera within
five days of your receipt of this letter. 
 

	  	  	  	  	  Accepted by:

	
	   

	  	  	  	   


	  Donald J. Listwin
  CEO
	  	  	  	  Kevin Kennedy
Exhibit 14.1
                                                                     -----------

                        N-VIRO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

                                 CODE OF ETHICS

     The  Board of Directors has determined that the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company hold important and elevated roles in
corporate  governance.  While  members of the management team, they are uniquely
capable  and  empowered  to  ensure  that  all  stakeholders'  interests  are
appropriately  balanced, protected and preserved.  This Code provides principles
to  which  these  individuals  are expected to adhere and advocate.  They embody
rules  regarding  individual  and  peer  responsibilities  to  the  Company, the
Company's  clients  and  shareholders.  Violations  of  the  Code  of Ethics may
subject  the  officer  to  censure,  suspension  or  termination.

     Each  of  the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer shall, at
all  times:

1.     Act  with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of
interest  in personal and professional relationships.  All material transactions
and relationships involving a potential conflict of interest between the Company
and  the  Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer must be approved in
advance  by  the  Board  of  Directors  of  the  Company.

2.     Provide  full,  fair,  accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in
reports and documents that the Company files with, or submits to, the Securities
and  Exchange Commission and in other public communications made by the Company.

3.     Comply  with  applicable  rules  and  regulations  of  federal,  state,
provincial  and  local  governments,  and  other  appropriate private and public
regulatory  agencies.

4.     Act  in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence,
without  misrepresenting  material facts or allowing his independent judgment to
be  subordinated.

5.     Respect  the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of his
work  except  when  authorized  or  otherwise  legally  obligated  to  disclose.
Confidential  information  acquired  in the course of his work shall not be used
for  personal  advantage.

6.     Share  knowledge  and  maintain  skills  important  and  relevant  to the
Company's  needs.

7.     Proactively promote ethical behavior as a responsible partner among peers
in  his  work  environment.

8.     Achieve  responsible  use  of  and  control  over  all Company assets and
resources  employed  or  entrusted  to  him.

9.     Report  promptly  known  or  suspected  violations  of  this  Code to the
Chairman  of  the  Audit  Committee.

     Each  waiver  of  a  provision  of  this  Code of Ethics, and each material
transaction  and  relationship  involving  a  conflict  of  interest between the
Company  and  the  Chief  Executive  Officer or Chief Financial Officer which is
approved  by  the  Board of Directors, must be disclosed in the periodic reports
filed  by  the  Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to
the  rules  of  the  Commission.