alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.1**

**302 CERTIFICATION**

I, RicardoDarré, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of YPF S.A.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this reportany change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:April 7, 2017.
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,

# FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS MATTHEW POWELL NO. 

### 2021 KW 1594 MARCH 14, 

### 2022 In Re: Matthew Powell, 

### applying for supervisory writs, 

### 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, No. 

### 19- 01661. BEFORE: GUIDRY, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The district court 

### is ordered to act on relator' s " Motion to Amend 

### Sentence to Receive Concurrent Imposition" 

## filed May27, 2021, 

## if it has not already done so. JMG GH WRC

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

# AwUft CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
EXHIBIT
31.1




CERTIFICATIONS




I,
William Yan Sui Hui, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, of Innocom
Technology Holdings, Inc.:




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and




5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internalcontrol over
financial reporting.





Date:
      May 20, 2009
              
              
              /s/
      William Yan Sui HuiWilliam
      Yan Sui Hui ,
                  Chief
      Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.2


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      We  have  issued  our  report  dated  March  24,  2005,  accompanying  the
consolidated  financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
Tarrant Apparel Group and  subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006. We hereby consent to the  incorporation by reference of said report in
the  Registration  Statements  of Tarrant  Apparel  Group on Forms S-3 (File No.
333-110090,  effective November 6, 2003, File No. 333-111092, effective December
23, 2003, File No. 333-122043,  effective June 10, 2005 and File No. 333-136585,
effective  September 21, 2006) and on Forms S-8 (File No.  333-49810,  effective
November 13,  2000,  File No.  333-106151,  effective  June 16,  2003,  File No.
333-106152,  effective June 16, 2003,  File No.  333-106153,  effective June 16,
2003,  File No.  333-114377,  effective  April 9, 2004 and File No.  333-136697,
effective August 17, 2006).


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

GRANT THORNTON LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 27, 2007
#### Ulas M. WILLIAMS v. SOUTHERN BUILDERS, INC. and American Insurance Co.

No. 61980.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 5, 1978.

In re: Ulas M. Williams, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of *633Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 357 So.2d 579.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         944853
<NAME>                        JENNA LANE, INC.
             
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     MAR-31-1998              
<PERIOD-START>                        APR-01-1997        
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-1998     
<CASH>                                      6,595        
<SECURITIES>                                    0     
<RECEIVABLES>                           4,440,310            
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0    
<INVENTORY>                             5,888,085          
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       10,757,260             
<PP&E>                                    664,249          
<DEPRECIATION>                            162,632          
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         11,537,169       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   3,430,963      
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0 
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                   47,290
<OTHER-SE>                              8,025,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           11,537,169
<SALES>                                42,561,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       42,561,796
<CGS>                                  34,514,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          41,642,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           919,322
<INCOME-TAX>                              402,165
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       517,157 
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              517,157
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.09
        


</TABLE>
### Ground water in the Raft River Basin, Idaho, with special reference to irrigation use, 1956-60

By: Maurice John MundorffH.G. Sisco

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1619CC

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

In the Raft River basin in south-central Idaho, ground-water withdrawals for irrigation have more than doubled since 1955, when data were compiled for a comprehensive report on the area. The present report summerizes data on the ground-water use and changes in the water regimen during the intervening 5 years. Water levels have declined 10 to 20 feet in the areas of heaviest pumping and 3 to 5 feet throughout the remainder of the area. These water-level declines are related to increased ground-water pumpage and below-normal precipitation in the basin. The total pumpage during the 1960 irrigation season is estimated to be about 127,000 acre-feet, of which about half was consumed by crops or evaporated. The remainder returned to the aquifer.

Irrigation development is acting to reduce the amount of underflow out of the basin. The water table can be lowered considerably more before underflow from the basin would be reduced substantially.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Of the Northern District of Florida, sitting by *

designation.

Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter.

 United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 04-1477

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

CLINT JOSEPH,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Joseph A. DiClerico, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Torruella and Lynch, Circuit Judges,

Stafford, Senior District Judge. *

Elaine Mittleman on brief for appellant.

Aixa Maldonado-Quiñones, Assistant United States Attorney, and

Thomas P. Colantuono, United States Attorney, on brief for

appellee.

May 23, 2008
-2-

Per Curiam. This is a sentencing appeal. Clint Joseph

pled guilty in December 2003 to possession with intent to

distribute five grams or more of cocaine base. 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B)(iii). On March 19, 2004, he was

sentenced to eighty-seven months' imprisonment, five years of

supervised release, and a special assessment of $100. The sentence

was at the low end of the Guidelines range. The court rejected

Joseph's argument that he receive the mandatory minimum sentence of

sixty months.

The sentence was imposed before the Supreme Court's

decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). Joseph's

first argument is that his sentence should be vacated and the case

remanded to the sentencing court under Booker. But Joseph plainly

does not meet the standards for such a remand under the circuit's

plain error standard for unpreserved claims of Booker error, set

out in United States v. Antonakopoulos, 399 F.3d 68, 75 (1st Cir.

2005). We affirm his sentence.

Joseph also argues the case should be remanded in light

of two arguments he has never presented to the district court.

First, he argues that he should be resentenced in light of a recent

amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines reducing the base offense

level for most crack cocaine offenses. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1; id.

app. C, amend. 711 (effective Nov. 1. 2007). On March 3, 2008,

this amendment to the Guidelines was made retroactive, which allows
-3-

defendant to file a post-sentencing motion with the district court

to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). See id. §

1B1.10. Second, he argues that the Guideline which makes the

amendment retroactive, section 1B1.10, is itself unconstitutional,

because according to Joseph, the provision provides limitations on

the court's discretion once the court calculates the amended

Guidelines range.

If Joseph so chooses, he may file appropriate motions to

raise these issues in the district court. Nothing in this judgment

precludes that. We simply affirm his original sentence and remand

the matter to the district court to entertain any motions defendant

may promptly file. See United States v. Connell, 960 F.2d 191, 197

(1st Cir. 1992).

So ordered.
#### Jack DEAN, E. F. Van Kessel, E. D. Gaynor, Edward Bandlow, George V. Warren and E. W. Weaver, County Commissioners of Palm Beach County, Florida, David L. Reid, County Tax Assessor of Palm Beach County, Florida, Ernie McGehee, County Tax Collector of Palm Beach County, Florida, and Fred O. Dickinson, Jr., Comptroller of the State of Florida, Appellants, v. PALM BEACH MALL, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-835.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 10, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James C. Downey, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26844]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Microelectronic Information Processing 
Systems; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel In Microelectronic Information 
Processing Systems (1206).
    Date and Time: November 5, 1997; 8:30 a.m. to 5;00 p.m.
    Place: Room 340, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Michael Foster, Program Director, 
Microelectronic Information Processing Systems Division, National 
Science Foundation, Rm. 1155, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 
22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1936.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the NSF 
CAREER program in the area of microelectronic information processing 
systems.
    Reason for Closing: the meeting is closed to the public because 
the Committee is reviewing proposals that will include privileged 
intellectual property and personal information that could harm 
individuals if they are disclosed. If discussions were open to the 
public, these matters that are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act would be improperly 
disclosed.

    Dated: October 6, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26844 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26338]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 30, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Betsy Buttrill White, Senior 
Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Canisteo Valley Corporation, Canisteo, New York; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
First State Bank, Canisteo, New York.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Great Southern Capital Corporation Employee Stock Ownership 
Trust, Meridian, Mississippi; to acquire at least 50 percent of the 
voting shares of Great Southern Capital Corporation, Meridian, 
Mississippi, and thereby indirectly acquire Great Southern National 
Bank, Meridian, Mississippi.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. First Citizens Bancshares, Inc., Dyersburg, Tennessee; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Bank of Troy, Troy, 
Tennessee.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 30, 
1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-26338 Filed 10-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26141]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel for Neuroscience; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Panel for Neuroscience (1158).
    Date and Time: November 20 & 21, 1997; 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 340, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open.
    Contact Persons: Dr. Christopher Platt, Program Director, Dr. 
Daniel Hartline, Program Director; Division of Integrative Biology 
and Neuroscience; room 685, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230; Telephone: (703) 306-1423.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact persons listed above.
    Agenda: Open Session: November 21, 1997; 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., 
To discuss research trends and opportunities in Neuronal and Glial 
Mechanisms.
    Closed Session: November 20, 1997; 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; 
November 21, 1997, 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.; 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. To 
review and evaluate Neuronal and Glial Mechanisms proposals as part 
of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 29, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26141 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Case 1:04-cv-00025-GLL   Document 48   Filed 08/02/06   Page 1 of 7

Case 1:04-cv-00025-GLL   Document 48   Filed 08/02/06   Page 2 of 7

Case 1:04-cv-00025-GLL   Document 48   Filed 08/02/06   Page 3 of 7

Case 1:04-cv-00025-GLL   Document 48   Filed 08/02/06   Page 4 of 7

Case 1:04-cv-00025-GLL   Document 48   Filed 08/02/06   Page 5 of 7

Case 1:04-cv-00025-GLL   Document 48   Filed 08/02/06   Page 6 of 7

Case 1:04-cv-00025-GLL   Document 48   Filed 08/02/06   Page 7 of 7

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2014-03-10T22:33:35-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO