alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WILLIAM O. LANTANASIO, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-162 Erie

v. )

)

JEFFREY A. BEARD, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

On May 24, 2005, Petitioner commenced this case by filing a motion to proceed

in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 1] which was unaccompanied by a certified copy of his

inmate account statement, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). The matter was

referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and

recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and

Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on June 3, 2005,

recommended that the case be dismissed without prejudice since Petitioner had failed

to submit the requisite certified copy of his inmate account statement. The parties were

allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. On June 17, 2005,

Petitioner filed an objection to Magistrate Judge Baxter’s Report and Recommendation

requesting a ten (10) day extension in which to file another in forma pauperis request

accompanied by a certified account statement. However, as of August 1, Petitioner had

failed to file the required account statement in support of his pending in forma pauperis

request. Accordingly, on August 2, 2005, Magistrate Judge Baxter entered an order

directing Petitioner to show cause, on or before August 16, 2005, for his failure to file a

certified copy of his inmate account statement for the six month period immediately

preceding the filing of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. This August 2, 2005

order instructed Petitioner that, if he failed to file a certified account statement with this

Case 1:05-cv-00162-SJM-SPB Document 5 Filed 08/17/05 Page 1 of 2
2

Court on or before August 16, 2005, the case would be dismissed for failure to

prosecute in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s June 3, 2005 Report and

Recommendation. To date, Petitioner has failed to file the required account statement.

After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the

Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 17th day of August 2005;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is 

DISMISSED without prejudice.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on

June 3, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00162-SJM-SPB Document 5 Filed 08/17/05 Page 2 of 2
#### THE MACCABEES, a corporation, Appellant, v. Abe WILENSKY, Appellee.

No. 71-61.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 19, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Howard Philip Welt, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of N2H2, Inc. (N2H2);

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of N2H2 as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.   N2H2's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for N2H2 and have:

     a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to N2H2,
         including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
         within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
         report is being prepared;

     b)  evaluated the effectiveness of N2H2's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)  disclosed in this report any change in N2H2's internal control over
         financial reporting that occurred during N2H2's most recent fiscal
         quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
         materially affect, N2H2's internal control over financial reporting;
         and

5.   N2H2's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to N2H2's auditors and the audit committee of N2H2's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
         operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect N2H2's ability to record,
         process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in N2H2's internal control over
         financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2003


/s/   HOWARD PHILIP WELT
-------------------------------------
Howard Philip Welt
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ERIC HOUSTON, :

:

Plaintiff :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-13-3063

:

WARDEN JEFF THOMAS, ET AL., : (Judge Brann)

:

Defendants :

ORDER

January 15, 2016

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff’s action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for

failure to prosecute.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

3. Any appeal from this Order will be deemed frivolous, without

probable cause and not taken in good faith.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann 

United States District Judge

Case 4:13-cv-03063-MWB-JVW Document 21 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:04-cv-00230-MBC Document 187 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 8Case 1:04-cv-00230-MBC Document 187 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 8Case 1:04-cv-00230-MBC Document 187 Filed 06/20/06 Page 3 of 8Case 1:04-cv-00230-MBC Document 187 Filed 06/20/06 Page 4 of 8Case 1:04-cv-00230-MBC Document 187 Filed 06/20/06 Page 5 of 8Case 1:04-cv-00230-MBC Document 187 Filed 06/20/06 Page 6 of 8Case 1:04-cv-00230-MBC Document 187 Filed 06/20/06 Page 7 of 8Case 1:04-cv-00230-MBC Document 187 Filed 06/20/06 Page 8 of 8
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26481]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-104-005]


Kentucky West Virginia Gas Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Proposed 
Changes In FERC Gas Tariff

October 1, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 26, 1997, Kentucky West Virginia Gas 
Company, L.L.C. (Kentucky West) tendered for filing as part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff 
sheets to become effective November 1, 1997:

Second Revised Sheet No. 119
Second Revised Sheet No. 120
First Revised Sheet No. 120A
First Revised Sheet No. 120B
First Revised Sheet No. 134
First Revised Sheet No. 135
First Revised Sheet No. 136
Second Revised Sheet No. 137
Second Revised Sheet No. 171
Third Revised Sheet No. 172

    Kentucky West states that the purpose of this filing is to comply 
with the Commission's June 25, 1997 in the captioned docket, and to 
implement the business practices standards which were adopted in Order 
No. 587-C.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests should be filed 
as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26481 Filed 10-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 183 (Monday, September 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25149]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:40 a.m. on 
Tuesday, September 16, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
relating to the Corporation's supervisory and administrative 
enforcement activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director 
Joseph H. Neely (Appointive), seconded by Director Eugene A. Ludwig 
(Comptroller of the Currency), concurred in by Mr. John Downey, acting 
in place and stead of Director Nicolas P. Retsinas (Director, Office of 
Thrift Supervision), and Acting Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., that 
Corporation business required its consideration of the matters on less 
than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the 
meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require 
consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; 
and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by 
authority of subsections (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), and (c)(9)(A)(ii) of 
the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(4), (c)(6), 
(c)(8), and (c)(9)(A)(ii)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550--17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: September 16, 1997.

    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25149 Filed 9-17-97; 4:34 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
Exhibit 16

                         Letter re Change of Accountant
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 16



Accountants and Management Advisors                     Grant Thornton {logo}


December 21, 2004

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Office of the Chief Accountant
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549


Re: United Bancshares, Inc.
File No. 0-25976


Dear Sirs or Madams:

     We have read Item 4.01 of Form 8-K of United Bancshares, Inc. dated
December 21, 2004 and agree with the statements concerning our Firm in
paragraphs (i), (ii), (iv), and (v); however, we are not in a position to agree
or disagree with the statement in the last sentence of paragraph (i) as to the
reason for changing independent accountants.


Very truly yours,


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
-----------------------
Grant Thornton LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
December 21, 2004






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Suite 3100
Two Commerce Square
2001 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-7080
T  215.561.4200
F  215.561.1066
W  www.grantthornton.com

Grant Thornton LLP
US Member of Grant Thornton International
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 23.3

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 33-62787) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 
(Nos. 33-57083, 33-57077, 33-57081 and 33-64553) of AirTouch Communications, 
Inc. of our report dated February 16, 1996, relating to the consolidated 
financial statements and schedule of Cellular Communications, Inc. included in
its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1995.




                                               Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 26, 1996
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Derek Schneideman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

   b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8238 (June 5, 2003)];

   c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. As the registrant's certifying officer I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2007                      /s/ Derek Schneideman
                                        Derek Schneideman
                                        Chief Executive Officer
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated, January 13, 1997, accompanying the consoli-
dated financial statements incorporated by reference in the Annual Report of
Georgia Bancshares, Inc on Form-10KSB for the year ended December 31, 1996.
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statement of Georgia Bancshares, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No.
333-09829, effective August 9, 1996).

                                                 PORTER KEADLE MOORE, LLP



                                                 /s/ Porter Keadle Moore, LLP

                                                 Successor to the practice:
                                                 Evans, Porter, Bryan & Co.
J

~~~ ED STq T

~ S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY o 

### ~~~~ Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 y ~ 11(I r

0 PROS' G

~ ` 

### SEP i 6 20;3 1
Mr. J. R. Stroble OFFICE OF Manager, National TRU Program AIR AND RADIATION Carlsbad Field Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090
Dear Mr. Stroble:
On May 30, 2013, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) requested that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approve, as a Tier 1(T1) change, the addition of Contact-Handled (CH) transuranic (TRU) debris waste from the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to the supercompacted CH debris Waste Strearn of the Advanced Mixed Waste Treatment Project (AMWTP) at the Idaho National Laboratory. The Idaho Treatment Group (ITG) at AMWTP is responsible for characterization of supercompacted or direct shipped CH TRU debris waste using the EPA-approved CH TRU waste characterization processes. The enclosed report (EPA Air pocket No. A-98-49; II-A4-178) discusses EPA's evaluation of pertinent T1 change information and our approval. As a result, upon processing and characterization, AMWTP may dispose of LANL's CH debris waste from already approved LANL-CCP waste streams as part of the supercompacted AMWTP Waste Stream at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). In October 2006, EPA approved the CH TRU waste characterization processes implemented by the Central Characterization Project (CCP) (see EPA Docket No. A-98-49; II-A4-66). Since late 2011, ITG has been responsible for continued implementation of this EPA-approved CH TRU waste characterization of CH TRU debris waste containers for WIPP disposal. In Apri12013, EPA issued a report which verified ITG's continued compliance with EPA regulations at 40 CFR 194.24 (see EPA Docket No. A-98-49; II-A4-173). If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462 or Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422.
Sinc ,
om Peake, Director Center for Waste Management and Regulations
Enclosure

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov

Recycled/Recyclable o Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Papercc: Electronic Distribution

Doug Tonkay, DOE EM Alton Harris, DOE EM Joe Franco, CBFO Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP Tom Morgan, CBFO NTP Mark Pearcy, WTS-CCP Ben Roberts, DOE ID Jenry Wells, DOE ID Dave Haar, AMWTP-ITG Trais Kliphuis, NMED Raymond Lee, EPA HQ Site Documents
255 La. 813

#### Frank M. COURVILLE v. B & B ENGINEERING AND SUPPLY CO., Inc., the Travelers Insurance Company, and B. E. Townsend.

No. 50434.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 3, 1970.

In re: B & B Engineering and Supply Co., Inc., The Travelers Insurance Company and B. E. Townsend applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 230 So.2d 377.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.
Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

J. 

order as certification of the district court's intention to grant 

reconsideration. We grant the motion and we 

ORDER this matter REMANDED to the district court.' 

cc: Hon. Jerome Polaha, District Judge 

Mary Lou Wilson 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

3-This order constitutes our final disposition of this appeal. Any 

subsequent appeal shall be docketed as a new matter. 

2
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 1364

JOHN DOE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. BILL CROUCH, in his official capacity as Cabinet Secretary of the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources; AYNE AMJAD, in her official capacity as Commissioner for the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resouces, Bureau of Public H ealth and State Health Officer, and; MATTHEW WICKERT, in his official capacity as the State Registar for Vital Statistics , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Charl eston

. Joseph R. Goodwin, District Judge. ( 2:22

- cv - 00328 )

Submitted : July 25 , 2023 Decided: July 28, 2023

Before WYNN and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

John Doe , Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Sara See , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA , Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1364 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: John Doe appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation with modifications, dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action challenging application of W. Va. Code. § 16

- 5

- 10(e) for lack of Article III standing and as barred by the Rooker

- Feldman ∗ doctri ne, and directing him to show cause why a prefiling injunction should not issue. Doe confines his appeal to the district court’s dismissal of his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
See Episcopal Church in S.C. v. Church Ins. Co. of Vt. , 997 F.3d 149, 154 (4th Cir. 2021) (reviewing de novo dismissal for lack of standing); Hulsey v. Cisa , 947 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2020) (reviewing de novo dismissal of claims as barred by Rooker

- Feldman ). Accordingly, we affirm the distr ict court’s order. Doe v. Crouch , No. 2:22

- cv - 00328 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 30, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional p rocess.
AFFIRMED

∗ D.C. Ct. of App. v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Tr. Co. , 263 U.S. 413 (1923). USCA4 Appeal: 23-1364 Doc: 7 Filed: 07/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Case 1:05-cv-00322-GLL   Document 30   Filed 04/26/06   Page 1 of 12

Case 1:05-cv-00322-GLL   Document 30   Filed 04/26/06   Page 2 of 12

Case 1:05-cv-00322-GLL   Document 30   Filed 04/26/06   Page 3 of 12

Case 1:05-cv-00322-GLL   Document 30   Filed 04/26/06   Page 4 of 12

Case 1:05-cv-00322-GLL   Document 30   Filed 04/26/06   Page 5 of 12

Case 1:05-cv-00322-GLL   Document 30   Filed 04/26/06   Page 6 of 12

Case 1:05-cv-00322-GLL   Document 30   Filed 04/26/06   Page 7 of 12

Case 1:05-cv-00322-GLL   Document 30   Filed 04/26/06   Page 8 of 12

Case 1:05-cv-00322-GLL   Document 30   Filed 04/26/06   Page 9 of 12

Case 1:05-cv-00322-GLL   Document 30   Filed 04/26/06   Page 10 of 12

Case 1:05-cv-00322-GLL   Document 30   Filed 04/26/06   Page 11 of 12

Case 1:05-cv-00322-GLL   Document 30   Filed 04/26/06   Page 12 of 12