USA Banner
  U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Here's how you knowOfficial US Government Icon
              **Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
            Secure Site Icon
              **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
 U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation
 Search DOT
            Search
                    About FHWAFHWA Organization
                Headquarters Offices
                Field Offices
                Strategic Plan
                Business Opportunities
                Staff Directories
                Careers
                Highway History
                Contact UsProgramsAcquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                Safety
                Browse by TopicsResourcesCore Highway Topics
                Federal Aid Essentials
                Automation
                Complete Streets
                Laws and Regulations
                Policy & Guidance Center
                Section 508
                Publications and Statistics
                Professional Development
                National Highway Institute
                Resource Center
                Accessibility Resource Library
                FHWA Research LibraryNewsroomPress Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Photos
                Videos
                Media ContactsMenu FHWA Highway Safety Programs Home
                        Safety
                        Roadway Departure Safety
                        Reduce Crash Severity
                        Hardware Eligibility Letters


            
            In This Section
        Roadway Departure Safety
                Strategic Approach
                                Strategic Plan
                Crash Emphasis Brochures
                Focused Approach
                Noteworthy Practices
                Partner Resources
                Keep Vehicles on the Road
                                Pavement Friction
                Horizontal Curve Safety
                Rumble Strips and Rumble Stripes
                Nighttime Visibility
                Provide for a Safe Recovery
                                SafetyEdge
                Clear Zones
                Reduce Crash Severity
                                Overview
                Hardware Eligibility Letters
                Focus on Reducing Rural Roadway Departures (FoRRRwD)
                                Overview
                All Public Roads
                Proven Countermeasures
                Systemic Approach
                Safety Action Plans
                FoRRRwD Resources
                
                Safety Eligibility Letter SS-25
  
  **Hardware Type:**
            Sign Supports, Mailboxes, and Delineator Posts
                          **Code:**
            SS-25
                          **Date:**
            06/04/1991
                          **Testing Criteria:**
            NCHRP 350
                                  **Device Description:**
            a. Single or dual 4"x4" wood, undrilled
b. Single 6"x8" wood with 3.0" holes
c. Single 6"x6" wood with 2.0" holes
d. Single 4"x6" wood with 1.5" holes
e. Dual W6x12 steel post on slip base
 (up to 18 ppf for dual supports OK
                          **View PDF:**
            ss25.pdf (105.93 KB)
    
    United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration

June 4, 1991

Refer to: HNG-14/SS-25

Regional Federal Highway Administrators
Federal Lands Highway Program Administrator

Our July 6, 1990, memorandum "Breakaway Sign and Luminaire Supports" discussed the National pooled-fund study, "Testing of Small and Large Sign Supports." Full-scale crash tests of sign supports currently in sue by the pooled-fund States are being conducted under this 41-month contract. Because the final results from this study will not be available for at least another 21 months we are transmitting some preliminary information that may be useful to States planning to revise their standard drawings in the near future.

A variety of signpost systems have been tested to date. Those systems that failed crash testing are unacceptable for use on Federal-aid highway projects. Because these systems ere all "grandfathered" by virtue of their inclusion in the pooled-fund study they are still is use in many States. Any States still using systems which have failed crash testing should be requested to change their sign support standards to acceptable designs as soon as practical. These States should be encourage to adopt small sign support systems which have already been successfully tested in both strong and weak soils. Lists of crashworthy roadside hardware, including breakaway sign supports, have previously been sent to your office. Should you need copies of any of the acceptance letters, or an updated list at any time, please contact Mr. Nicholas Artimovich at (FTS) 366-1331. Following is a summary of the testing and a discussion of the results. All tests used automobiles ballasted to weigh 840 kg. (1,850 pounds.) Grade 2 air-dried southern yellow pine posts were used for all wood posttests.

Acceptable – Dual Unmodified 89-mm x 89-mm (4- x 4-inch) Wood PostsTest Number
			90F050
			90F054
			90F055
			90F015Soil Type
			Weak
			Weak
			Strong
			StrongImpact Speed, km/h (mph)
			32.7 (20.3)
			97.0 (60.3)
			33.3 (20.7)
			94.9 (59.0)Vehicle Delta V, m/s (fps)
			1.31 (4.3)
			0.61 (2.0)
			0.98 (3.2)
			1.21 (4.0)Occupant Impact, m/s (fps)
			No impact
			No impact
			No impact
			No impactStub Height – (No stubs were left protruding above the soil.)The test results met the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) breakaway requirements for velocity change and stub height. Therefore, a sign supported by one or two unmodified 4- x 4-inch (actual dimensions 89- x 89-mm (3.5- x 3.5-inch)) wood posts in strong or weak soil is acceptable for use on Federal-aid highway projects, if requested by a State.

Acceptable – Drilled 140- x 190-mm (6- x 8-inch) Wood PostTest Number
			90F045
			90F046Soil Type
			Weak
			WeakImpact Speed, km/h (mph)
			33.5 (20.8)
			97.0 (60.3)Vehicle Delta V, m/s (fps)
			5.34 (17.5)
			1.25 (4.1)Occupant Impact, m/s (fps)
			3.23 910.6)
			No impactStub Height, mm (in)
			76 (3)
			76 (3)The weak soil tests were judged to be the worst-case scenario; therefore, no strong soil tests were conducted. The occupant changes in velocity in both tests met FHWA requirements. The stub heights also met FHWA criteria. Therefore, a sign mounted on a single 6- x 8-inch (actual dimensions 140- x 190-mm (5.5- x 7.5-inch)) wood post with 75-mm (3-inch) diameter holes drilled at 100 mm (4 inches) and 460 mm (18 inches) above the groundline, perpendicular to the roadway centerline, is acceptable for use on Federal-aid highway projects if requested by a State. If multiple 140- x 190-mm (6- x 8-inch) drilled posts are used they must be spaced 2.15 m (7 feet) or more apart.

Acceptable – Drilled 89- x 140-mm (4- x 6-inch) and 140- x 140-mm (6- x 6-inch) Wood PostsUnacceptable – Unmodified 89- x 140-mm (4- x 6-inch) Wood PostsTest Number
			90F037 (Single 89 mm x 140 mm unmodified)Soil Type
			WeakImpact Speed, km/h (mph)
			33.0 (20.5)Vehicle Delta V, m/s (fps)
			7.68 (25.2)Occupant Impact, m/s (fps)
			5.54 (18.2)The unmodified 89- x 140-mm (4- x 6-inch) wood post in weak soil failed its crash test. This single post system was directly buried I the soil with no weakening features. However, because of the performance of the 89- x 89-mm (4- x 4-inch) unmodified posts and the 140- x 190-mm (6- x 8-inch) post with holes drilled perpendicular to roadway centerline, we believe that single 89- x 140-mm (4- x 6-inch) wood posts modified with 38-mm (1 1⁄2-inch) diameter holes and 140- x 140-mm (6- x 6-inch) wood posts modified with 50-mm (2-inch) diameter holes would be crashworthy. The holes should be centered at 100 mm (4 inches) and 460 mm (18 inches) above the groundline and perpendicular to the roadway centerline. Therefore 89- x 140-mm, 140- x 140-mm, and 140- x 190-mm (4- x 6-inch, 6- x 6-inch, and 6- x 8-inch) wood posts in soil, modified by the appropriate size holes, are acceptable when spaced 2.15 m (7 feet) or more apart.

No tests of wood supports placed in concrete have been conducted under the contract. Since we do not know where or how a wood post would fail when constrained by a concrete foundation, we will not discuss concrete foundations for wood posts at this time.

Acceptable – Dual Leg W6x12 and other Structural Shapes on Slip-BasesTest Number
			90F043
			90F044Soil Type
			(Slip-Bases Mounted on Simulated concrete Foundation)Bolt Torque, N.m (ft-lb)
			75 (55)
			75 (55)Impact Speed, km/h (mph)
			33.8 (21.0)
			96.4 (59.9)Vehicle Delta V, m/s (fps)
			2.44 (8.0)
			2.41 (7.9)Occupant Impact, m/s (fps)
			No impact
			No impactStub Height, mm (in)
			76 (3)
			76 (3)The dual legged W6x12 structural steel shape on rectangular slip-bases mounted on simulated concrete foundations passed the required crash tests. We recommend that the bolt torques shown in Table 4.1 of the Roadside Design Guide be used. In any event the bolt torques should not exceed those of the tested sign support.

Since both posts were struck during the successful tests, two posts up to 18 kg/m (12 pounds-per-foot) each may be used within a 2.15 m (7 foot) span for a large roadside sign. Prior testing had shown that a single post of up to 67 kg/m (45 pounds-per-foot) is acceptable for multiple post supports when the posts are more than 2.15 m (7 feet) apart. That will remain valid. However, it is not acceptable to use two posts whose total unit weight is up to 67 kg/m 45 pounds-per-foot). On the other hand, from the relatively low delta V's in dual-leg impact tests and those in the 67 kg/m (45 pound-per-foot) posttest series [3.0 m/s (9.9 fps) and 2.7 m/s (8.8 fps) for 20-m.p.h. and 60-m.p.h. respectively] it is obvious dual posts each weighing more than 18 kg/m (12 pounds-per-foot) should be allowed. Without further testing, FHWA will accept dual slip-base supports within a 2.1 m (7-foot) span when each support weighs no more than 27 kg/m (18 pounds-per-foot).

Unacceptable – Full-Length, 6-kg/m (4 pound/foot) Dual Flanged Channel "U" Posts and 6-kg/m (4 pound/foot) Dual Flanged Channel "U" Posts with 460-mm (18-inch) Lapped Splice at GroundlineTest Article
			Dual Base Bending "U" Post
			Dual Spliced "U" PostTest Number
			90F047
			90F049Soil Type
			Weak
			WeakImpact Speed, km/h (mph)
			32.5 920.2)
			32.7 (20.3)Vehicle Delta V, m/s (fps)
			8.3 (27.3)
			9.0 (29.6)Occupant Impact, m/s (fps)
			6.0 (19.7)
			6.6 (21.8)Dual base bending 6-kg/m (4 pound/foot) flanged channel "U" posts failed their crash test. Therefore, this system is no longer acceptable for use on Federal-aid highway projects. A spliced version of the dual legged 6-kg/m (f pound/foot) "U" channel support system also failed a crash test. However, the 460-mm (18-inch) long splices were much stronger than the 100-mm (4-inch) breakaway lap splices at the groundline that were successfully crash tested in strong soil under an earlier Arizona Department of Transportation study. We are withholding action on the breakaway lap splice at this time, so it may continue to be used in strong soils per our prior acceptance.

Unacceptable – Dual Back-to-Back 3-kg/m (2-pound/foot) Flanged Channel "U" PostsTest Number
			90F048Soil Type
			WeakImpact Speed, km/h (mph)
			32.8 (20.4)Vehicle Delta V, m/s (fps)
			9.3 (30.4)Occupant Impact, m/s (fps)
			6.4 (21.1)Dual base bending back-to-back 3-kg/m (2-pound/foot) flanged channel "U" post (total 6-kg/m (4-pound/foot)), failed crash testing. Therefore, dual legged direct burial posts of back-to-back 33kg/m (2-pound-per-foot) flanged-channel supports are not acceptable for use on Federal-aid highway projects.

Unacceptable – Round Steel Pipe, 50-mm (2-inch) Diameter Schedule 40Test Number
			90F051
			90F053
			90F056
			90F057Soil Type
			Weak
			Weak
			Strong
			StrongImpact Speed, km/h (mph)
			31.9 (19.8)
			94.6 (58.8)
			32.7 (20.3)
			95.1 (59.1)Vehicle Delta V, m/s (fps)
			4.51 (14.8)
			3.32 (10.9)
			4.3 (14.1)
			7.14 (23.4)Occupant Impact, m/s (fps)
			3.66 (12.0)
			No impact
			3.97 (13.0)
			6.89 (22.6)Stub Height, mm (in)
			10 (4)
			None
			Insignificant
			NoneFifty-mm (2-inch) diameter, schedule 40 steel pipe in soil failed the crash testing program and is no longer acceptable for use on Federal-aid projects. This single post system was directly buried in the soil with no weakening features.

A summary of acceptable and not acceptable systems is attached for your convenience.

L. A. Staron, Chief
Federal-Aid and Design Division

Attachment

Geometric and Roadside Design Acceptance Letter Number SS-25
 

SummarySystem
			Acceptable
			Not AcceptableWood Post Systems

			(Grade 2 Southern Yellow Pine*)89- x 89-mm (4- x 4-inch) Unmodified Single Post
			X89- x 89-mm (4- x 4-inch) Unmodified Dual Post
			X140- x 190-mm (6- x 8-inch) Drilled Single Post

			(3-inch holes)
			X89- x 140-mm (4- x 6-inch) Drilled Single Post

			(1.5-inch holes)
			X140- x 140-mm (6- x 6-inch) Drilled Single Post

			(2-inch holes)
			X89- x 140-mm (4- x 6-inch) Unmodified Single Post
			
			XOther Tested SystemsDual W6x12** Steel Posts on Slip-Bases
			XSingle W12x45 Steel Post on Slip-Base
			X***"U" Post 6-kg/m (4-pound/foot) Base Bending Dual Posts
			
			X"U" Post 6-kg/m (4-pound/foot) with Long Groundline Splice, Dual Posts
			
			X****Back to Back 3-kg/m (2-pound/foot) "U" Channel Dual Posts
			
			X50-mm (2-inch) Schedule 40 Single Round Steel Pipe
			
			X*Southern Yellow Pine is a relatively strong softwood, therefore most other softwoods and some hardwoods will be acceptable for use as breakaway signposts. Care should be taken in specifying wood for posts to ensure that the strength does not significantly exceed that of the Grade 2 Southern Yellow Pine tested.

All the metric units shown are actual lumber sizes while the parenthetical units are nominal sizes for dressed lumber. Thus, the actual dimensions for the post lumber in English units are one half inch less than the values shown.

**Use of other shapes weighing up to 27 kg/m (18 pounds per foot) is also acceptable.

***Covered in June 15, 1987, memorandum. Lighter weight sections are also acceptable.

****No new information is available on "U" posts using short ground-level splices.

FHWA Safety Home| FHWA Home | Feedback

FHWA

United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Highway Administration**

1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE

WASHINGTON, DC 20590

202-366-4000Subscribe to email updates
                    About
  

        
              About FHWA
                Careers
                Org Chart
                Staff Directories
                Work with UsPrograms
  

        
              Acquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                SafetyPolicies, Rights, Legal
  

        
              About DOT
                Accessibility
                Budget and Performance
                Civil Rights
                FOIA
                Information Quality
                No FEAR Act
                Office of Inspector General
                Privacy Policy
                USA.gov
                Web Policies and Notices
                Web StandardsNews & Events
  

        
              Newsroom
                Press Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Media Contacts
                Connect with Us