alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-44,581-02

EX P ARTE NICK

Y CHARUN E AGN EW, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 007-1194-11-AIN THE 7T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM SMITH COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Ap p l i ca nt was convicted of the offense of possession of a c ontrolled substance and sente nced to imprisonment for life
. Applicant complains that: appellate counsel was ineffe ctive r e g a r d in g a mo ti o n f

o r r ehea ring ; trial counsel was ineffe ctive for abandoning a meritorious suppression arg ument; trial counsel was ineffe ctive for failing to object t o t es t imony from a DEA ag ent; trial counsel was ineffe ctive for failing to object to testimony reg arding coca ine addicts; and trial counsel was ineffe ctive for failingto object to closing arg ument. Strickland v. W ashington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984).

We order that this application be filed and set fo r s u b m ission on Applicant’s claim of ineffe cti v e as sistance of appellate counsel to deter mine whether the State Trooper who stopped Applicant for a traff

ic violation had rea sonable suspicion to continue Applicant’s detention afte r the purpose for the traff

ic-stop had ended, whether the drug -evide nce discovere d afte r a canine -assisted
sear ch should have been s u p p re s s ed, and whether appellate counsel was ineffe ctive for failing to proper ly raise the issue befor e the appellate court. The parties shall brief these i ssues. This Court has indepe ndently

revie wed Applica

nt’s rema ining c laims, and habe as re lief as to them is denied. I t appea rs that Applicant is repr esente d by counsel. I f that is not corr ect, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indigent. I f Applica nt is indi g ent and desires to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art 26.04. The trial court shall send t o t h i s C o u rt, within 60 day s of the date of this order , a
s u p p l em en tal transcr ipt containing : a confirma tion that Applicant is repr esente d by counsel; t h e order appointing counsel; or a statement that Applicant is not indige nt. All briefs shall be filed with this Court wit hin 90 day s of the date of this order.
Filed: September

12, 2018 Do not publish
EXHIBIT 10.56


                                December 5, 2001


Silicon Valley Bank
3003 Tasman Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95054

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Reference is made to the Loan and Security Agreement (Exim Program),
dated of even date, between us (the "Exim Loan Agreement") and the documents
relating thereto being signed concurrently (with the Exim Loan Agreement,
collectively, the "Exim Loan Documents".)

         This will confirm that the Exim Loan Agreement and the other Exim Loan
Documents represent the final agreement between the parties and may not be
contradicted by evidence of prior, contemporaneous, or subsequent oral
agreements of the parties. There are no unwritten oral agreements between the
parties.

                                       Very truly yours,

                                          VISEON, INC.


                                          By
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                President or Vice President

Accepted and agreed:

SILICON VALLEY BANK


By
   -----------------------------------
Title
      --------------------------------
256 La. 84

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Kenneth McNEELY v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 50622.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 1970.

In re: Kenneth McNeely applying for writ of habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
109 STAT. 266 PUBLIC LAW 104–27—SEPT. 6, 1995

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2077:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):

Aug. 4, considered and passed House.

Aug. 9, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–27

104th Congress

An Act

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 33 College Avenue

in Waterville, Maine, as the ‘‘George J. Mitchell Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF GEORGE J. MITCHELL POST OFFICE

BUILDING.

The United States Post Office building located at 33 College

Avenue in Waterville, Maine, shall be known and designated as

the ‘‘George J. Mitchell Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States Post

Office building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

a reference to the ‘‘George J. Mitchell Post Office Building’’.

Approved September 6, 1995.

Sept. 6, 1995

[H.R. 2077]
#### REDLAND CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. BEISWENGER, HOCH & ASSOCIATES, INC., a Florida Corp., Appellee.

No. 77-2046.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 11, 1978.

Raffel & Knight, Homestead, for appellant.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Miami, H. Lawrence Asher, North Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, NATHAN and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Cuna Mutual Insurance Society*v. *Adamides,*334 So.2d 75, 76 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); *Pope v. O’Brien,*213 So.2d 620, 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968).
SERVED: DECEMBER 19, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

KEYSTONE LABORATORIES 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS No. F AA-20 12-0203 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On April 9, 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter referred to as 

"Complainant") filed a Complaint. On March 23, 2(>12, Respondent Keystone Laboratories 

. (hereinafter "Respondent") had requested a hearing. On December 18, 2012, Complainant, on 

behalf of both parties, moved to terminate the proceedings and dismiss the case, citing 

settlement. Complainant's motion is the functional equivalent of, and will be treated as, a 

withdrawal of its Complaint. 

14 C.P.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney 

may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the 

consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint or 

a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative law judge 

shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." 
2 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Complaint having been read and 

considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Complainant's Withdrawal of Complaint be and is hereby granted; and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Adam D. Otto, Respondent's Counsel 

Otto Law Office 

P.O. Box 1356 

303 South Second Avenue West 

Newton, lA 50208 

TEL: 641-792-7000 

FAX: 641-792-7001 

ONE COPY 

Gayle E. Townsend, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Central Region, ACE7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Room 506, DOT Building 

901 Locust 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3766 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0203 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2683]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families

Agency Recordkeeping/Reporting Requirements Under Emergency 
Review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

    Title: Standard Federally-approved form for use by the State Child 
Support Enforcement (CSE) programs: ``Interstate Subpoena''.
    OMB No.: New.
    Description: PRWORA '96 (Pub. L. 104-193), section 324, requires 
the Secretary of DHHS to promulgate an interstate administrative 
subpoena form to be used by the State CSE programs to collect wage and 
income information for use in the establishment, modification and 
enforcement of child support orders.
    Respondents: States, Guam, Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico and District 
of Columbia.
    Annual Burden Estimates:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          Number of                             
                                                            Number of     responses      Average    Total burden
                       Instrument                          respondents       per      burden hours      hours   
                                                                         respondent   per response              
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interstate subpoena.....................................       15,391             1            .5         7,696 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 7,696.
    Additional Information: ACF is requesting that OMB grant a 180 day 
approval for this information collection under procedures for emergency 
processing by February 28, 1997. A copy of this information collection, 
with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by calling 
the Administration for Children and Families, Reports Clearance 
Officer, Douglas J. Godesky at (202) 401-4852.
    Comments and questions about the information collection described 
above should be directed to the Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for ACF, Office of Management and 
Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street N.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20503, (202) 395-7316.

    Dated: January 29, 1997.
Douglas J. Godesky,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-2683 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
```
EXHIBIT
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR






RULE
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,






AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the quarterly report of Pangea Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Charles B. Pollock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:






(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      November 14, 2008
            By: /s/
      Charles B. PollockCharles
      B. PollockChief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Hooker Furniture Corporation (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, E. Larry Ryder, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                        
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: July 11, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ E. Larry Ryder     
|                    |  |     |  | E. Larry Ryder         
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 188 (Monday, September 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50981-50982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25737]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

[Treasury Order Number 165-30]


Designation of Acting Commissioner of Customs; Authority 
Delegation

Dated: September 17, 1997.
    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Secretary of the Treasury, 
including the

[[Page 50982]]

authority vested by 31 U.S.C. 321(b) and 19 U.S.C. 2072(b), and it is 
ordered that:
    1. Samuel H. Banks, Deputy Commissioner, United States Customs 
Service, shall act as Commissioner of Customs until a new Commissioner 
of Customs who is appointed pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2071 executes the 
oath of office. Mr. Banks is authorized to use the title of Acting 
Commissioner of Customs.
    2. All duties and powers carried out by the Commissioner of Customs 
prior to the effective date of this Order shall be carried out by the 
Acting Commissioner of Customs.
    3. Effective Date. The foregoing arrangements are effective as of 
September 1, 1997. To the extent that any action heretofore taken 
consistent with this Order may require ratification, it is hereby 
approved and ratified.
    4. Cancellation. This temporary Order shall terminate without any 
further action when a new Commissioner of Customs who is appointed 
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2071 executes the oath of office.
Robert E. Rubin,
Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 97-25737 Filed 9-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

KEVIN WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

v.

GLOBEL TEL*LINK CORP., ET. AL.,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 449 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52599-52600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26575]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Apollo Eye Group, Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value and 
Redeemable Warrants) File No. 1-12812

October 1, 1997.
    Apollo Eye Group (``Company'') has filed an application with 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),

[[Page 52600]]

pursuant to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') and Rule 12d-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the 
above specified securities (``Securities) from listing and registration 
on the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. (``BSE'' or ``Exchange'').
    The reasons cited in the application for withdrawing the Securities 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, the Company's Common Stock is listed on 
the Nasdaq Bulletin Board and is held of record by less than one 
hundred (100) holders. The Company's Warrants are held by record by 
twenty-six (26) holders, and are quoted on Nasdaq.
    The Company cannot justify the expense of being listed in more than 
one market and thereby, wishes to withdraw from the BSE.
    By letter dated April 1, 1997, the BSE informed the Company that it 
had no objection to the withdrawal of the Company's Securities for 
listing on the Exchange.
    Any interested person may, on or before October 23, 1997, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
exchange and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application for the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegate authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26575 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Smooth Global (China) Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that:




1.             The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: November 18, 2010
By: /s/ Zheng ShuyingZheng Shuying, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
### Testimonyin support oftheproposed EPAcarbon rule Aviva Glaser, SeniorPolicySpecialist, NationalWildlife Federation July 29, 2014
Like manypeople who live in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, I feel a deep attachment to the streams, marshes, and shores thatprovide critical habitat for wildlife in this region. I don't think I will ever tire ofseeing the glossy ibises, snowy egrets, and American oystercatchers that gather in great numbers in our wetlands during spring migration, and I can't foresee a time in the future when seeing fiddler crabs scurrying around mudflats won'tbring a smile to my face,
or when catching a glimpse ofa great blue heron feeding in the marshes alongside mytrain during my morning commute doesn't make my dayjusta little bit better.

I have six young nephews who live in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, and seeing them begin to explore the natural world around them is an amazing thing. Justthis weekend, my 5 year old nephew told me thathe was learning to fish. "We didn't catch anybig fish," he said, jumpingup and down, his excitement bubbling over, "but I got to look at crabs and shrimp and I can't wait to go fishing again!"

Yet the fish andwildlife I love and that my nephews have begun to love here in the Chesapeake Bay watershed are faced with an unprecedented threat right now. Climate change threatens the very habitat that these vulnerable species depend on.
Thatis why we need action now, more than ever before, and that is why I support efforts to protect wildlife from the threat ofclimate change. EPA's proposed limits onindustrial carbon pollution are critically needed to protectAmerica's wildlife from the worst impacts ofclimate change. To protect the Chesapeake Bay's outdoor heritage for future generations, we must act
now to cut climate-disrupting carbon pollution.

As this rule moves forward, itis importantthatitbe implemented in a way that ensures that biomass energyis done right, in a way thattakes into account wildlife and carbon sequestration. We need biomass that replenishes forest habitatratherthan degrading forests, and there is information available now that canbe used to achieve that. And we needbiomass thatretains forest carbon storage in the nearterm, not far offinto the future. Ifbiomass is included underthe rule, emissions reductions must occur by 2030, and not anylater.

Power plants account for 40% ofthe carbon pollution in the United States, contributing significantlyto climate change. Ifwe continue as is, we will face a future ofmore frequent and increasinglyviolent extreme weather events, sea level rise, and stressors that will threaten public health and destroy and degrade wildlife habitat.

I hope that there will never be a time when the spring migration doesn'tbring ibises, herons, and egrets to the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. I want a future where wildlife thrives. Afuture where my nephews can go fishing and can continue to discover new wonders in nature every day. Thatis why I believe that we need to act on climate change, and we need to act today. I support EPA's Clean Power Plan.
#### Joyce DOHM, Appellant, v. JEFFERSON STORES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Appellee.

No. 2538.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 11, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; James F. Minnet, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.