alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,694,847
<SECURITIES>                                   156,443
<RECEIVABLES>                                  742,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              3,722,205
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,311,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            255,590
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                           6,445
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,079,198
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,311,233
<SALES>                                        1,685,245
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,685,245
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,138,043
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  547,202
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              547,202
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (119,678)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                     427,524
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .07
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Demegen, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard D. Ekstrom,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Richard D. Ekstrom



Richard D. Ekstrom
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2002
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

REGINALD REAVES, )

Petitioner, )

) C.A. No. 05-347Erie

vs. ) District Judge McLaughlin 

) Magistrate Judge Baxter 

PA BD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, )

Respondent )

O R D E R 

AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion to stay, vacate and reopen

[Document # 27] be DENIED as this case has already been transferred to the U.S. District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 

S/ Sean J. McLaughlin

Sean J. McLaughlin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:05-cv-00347-SJM-SPB Document 28 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.2





Consent of UHY LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-162609) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-75800, 333-70344, 333-44032, 333-83187, 33-94234, 333-89798, 333-131773, 333-126129, 333-151113, 333-161231 and 333-167324) of TranSwitch Corporation of our report dated March 16, 2010, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of TranSwitch Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2009, and the related financial statement schedule for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2009, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of TranSwitch
Corporation and subsidiaries.





/s/ UHY LLP





Houston, Texas


March 15, 2011
Case 1:04-cv-00354-MBC-SPB   Document 22   Filed 08/11/05   Page 1 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00354-MBC-SPB   Document 22   Filed 08/11/05   Page 2 of 3

Case 1:04-cv-00354-MBC-SPB   Document 22   Filed 08/11/05   Page 3 of 3

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2014-03-11T00:35:24-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

Subject: Notice of Communication in Docket: 

DOT-OST-2010-0018 

From: The Secretary 

To: Renee Wright, Progra 

Docket Management 

Memorandum 

Date: 

Reply to 

Attn. of: 

OCT 19 2012 

In accordance with Department rules (14 CFR Part 300), I am reporting the following 

communication. 

On October 5, 2012, during a call with Congressman Adam Smith of Washington, the 

Congressman expressed his support for the application of Delta Air Lines to operate between 

Seattle and Tokyo's Haneda International Airport. 

I informed the Congressman that, while I appreciated his interest in this case, l could not 

comment on its merits because the proceeding was under active consideration by the Department. 

Please place this memorandum in the appropriate file and in the Docket. 

CC: Congressman Adam Smith
Panel rehearing granted and rehearing en banc denied in No. 03-1220 by order filed 10/29/03UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1057

GEORGE ROGER SIEGEL, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ARLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT, and Its Agencies; CRESCENT RESOURCES, LLC; FRANK LASCH, Mid/Atlantic Property Manager; ARLINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, 17th Circuit Court and its Judges and Staff; UNITED STATES CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION; SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; UNKNOWN AGENTS, and Officers of Department of the Interior; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA; COMMONWEALTH ATLANTIC PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED; CRESCENT POTOMAC PROPERTIES, LLC; EDWARD M. SMITH, c/o BM Smith & Associates, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 03-1220

GEORGE ROGER SIEGEL, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus3 ARLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT, and Its Agencies; CRESCENT RESOURCES, LLC; FRANK LASCH, Mid/Atlantic Property Manager; ARLINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, 17th Circuit Court and its Judges and Staff; UNITED STATES CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION; SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA; COMMONWEALTH ATLANTIC PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED; CRESCENT POTOMAC PROPERTIES, LLC; EDWARD M. SMITH, c/o BM Smith & Associates; UNKNOWN AGENTS, and Officers of Department of the Interior, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-02-902-A) Submitted: May 22, 2003 Decided: May 30, 2003
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Roger Siegel, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).4 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, George Roger Siegel appeals two orders of the district court. In No. 03-1057, he challenges the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We review de novo the district court’s decision to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Tillman v. Resolution Trust Corp. , 37 F.3d 1032, 1034 (4th Cir. 1994). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeSiegel v. Arlington County Dep’t of Community Planning , No. CA-02-902-A (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 2, 2003 & entered Dec. 5, 2002; filed Jan. 23, 2003 & entered Jan. 24, 2003). In No. 03-1220, Siegel appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider under Rule 60, Fed. R. Civ. P. We review denial of a motion to reconsider for abuse of discretion, Werner v. Carbo , 731 F.2d 204, 206 (4th Cir. 1984), and we find no such abuse here. We deny Siegel’s motion to remand; we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 1 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 2 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 3 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 4 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 5 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 6 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 7 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 8 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 9 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 10 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 11 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 12 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 13 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 14 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 15 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 16 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 17 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 18 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 19 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 20 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 21 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 22 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 23 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 24 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 25 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 26 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 27 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 28 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 29 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 30 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 31 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 32 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 33 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 34 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 35 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 36 of 37

Case 4:14-cv-01562-MWB   Document 53   Filed 07/29/16   Page 37 of 37

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2020-12-31T12:33:04-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
EXHIBIT 22.0

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

I.    EVANS OIL OF LOUISIANA, INC.
      100% Owned Subsidiary
      Incorporated in the State of Louisiana

II.   IN & OUT MINI MART, INC.
      100% Owned Subsidiary
      Incorporated in the State of Texas

III.  DIAMOND MINI MART, INC.
      100% Owned Subsidiary of In & Out Mini Mart, Inc.
      Incorporated in the State of Texas

IV.   EVANS OIL COMPANY, INC.
      100% Owned Subsidiary
      Incorporated in the State of Texas

V.    EDCO, INC.
      19% Owned Subsidiary of Evans Systems, Inc.
      81% Owned Subsidiary of Evans Oil Company, Inc.
      Incorporated in the State of Texas

VI.   WAY ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
      100% Owned Subsidiary
      Incorporated in the State of Delaware

VII.  EDCO ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC.
      100% Owned Subsidiary
      Incorporated in the State of Texas

VIII. DISTRIBUTOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION
      100% Owned Subsidiary
      Incorporated in the State of Texas
#### Milan Levan PERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-119.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 10, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Russell E. Seay, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DONALD GRANBERRY, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 04-241 Erie

)

SUPER. BROOKS, et al., ) 

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Donald Granberry’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus was received by the Clerk of

Court on August 26, 2004, and was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge Susan

Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, filed on July 8, 2005, [Doc. No. 23]

recommended that Petitioner’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order or Preliminary

Injunction [Doc. No. 22] be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of

service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Defendants. 

Objections were filed by Petitioner on July 25, 2005. After de novo review of the case, together

with the report and recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2005,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Motion for Temporary Restraining

Order or Preliminary Injunction [Doc. No. 22] is DENIED. 

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated July 8, 2005, is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: All parties of record. 

Case 1:04-cv-00241-SJM-SPB Document 25 Filed 08/02/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

AMERICAN NATIONAL
INSURANCE COMPANY

In connection with the Annual Report of American National Insurance Company (the Company) on
Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), We, Robert L. Moody, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John
J. Dunn, Jr., Corporate Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



/s/ Robert L. MoodyRobert L. MoodyChairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ John J. Dunn, Jr.John J. Dunn, Jr.Corporate Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


Dated: March 8, 2013

This certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to
the liability of that section. This certification will not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Derek Schneideman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with
the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law.

                                        /s/ Derek Schneideman
                                        Derek Schneideman
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        November 19, 2007
EXHIBIT  32.02

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of AvStar Aviation Group, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"), the
undersigned,  in  the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  his  knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.     The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May  16,  2011                    /s/  Robert  Wilson
                                          -------------------
                                          Robert  Wilson,
                                          Chief  Financial  Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

TheBoard of Directors

Merge Technologies Incorporated:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-34884, 333-100104, 333-107997,333-40832, 333-40882, 333-107991, 333-125386) on Form S-8 of Merge TechnologiesIncorporated of our reports dated August 29, 2006, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Merge Technologies Incorporated as of December31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations,shareholders’ equity, comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each ofthe years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting asof December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31,2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Merge Technologies Incorporated. Our reportrefers to the Company’s restatement of its consolidated financial statements asof and for the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the year endedDecember 31, 2003.

Ourreport dated August 29, 2006, on management’s assessment of the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, expresses our opinionthat Merge Technologies Incorporated did not maintain effective internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 because of the effectsof material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of the controlcriteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states that managementidentified and included in management’s assessment material weaknesses relatingto revenue recognition, income taxes, business combinations and an ineffectivecontrol environment.
| /s/ KPMG LLP      |   |   |
|-------------------|--------|--------|
| Chicago, Illinois |   |
| August 29, 2006   |   |

 

----
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 772
11BIM01 Area 4 MapHome | Acronyms | Contents | Navigation | Profiles | Logs | Metadata | Software | Index
Click on the line name below to view the printable profile image.

Location Map | Area 1 | Area 2 | Area 3 | Area 4 | Area 5 | Area 6
Figure 6. Area 4 detailed trackline map of digital subbottom profile data collected during USGS field activity 11BIM01, offshore of the Chandeleur Islands (refer to Area 4 on figure 1 for location). Home | Acronyms | Contents | Navigation | Profiles | Logs | Metadata | Software | Index
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/772/html/area4.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, July 18, 2013, 12:02:06 PM
#### HILLIARD BROTHERS, INC., Appellant, v. UNIVERSAL C. I. T. CREDIT CORPORATION, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-502.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 9, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Roger A. Barker, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.