alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 772
11BIM01 Area 5 MapHome | Acronyms | Contents | Navigation | Profiles | Logs | Metadata | Software | Index
Click on the line name below to view the printable profile image.

Location Map | Area 1 | Area 2 | Area 3 | Area 4 | Area 5 | Area 6
Figure 7. Area 5 detailed trackline map of digital subbottom profile data collected during USGS field activity 11BIM01, offshore of the Chandeleur Islands (refer to Area 5 on figure 1 for location). Home | Acronyms | Contents | Navigation | Profiles | Logs | Metadata | Software | Index
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/772/html/area5.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, July 18, 2013, 12:02:26 PM
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2966 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2966

To amend the Public Health Service Act to encourage programs to address 
                     college athlete mental health.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 28 (legislative day, September 22), 2023

 Mr. Boozman (for himself, Mr. Booker, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Blumenthal, 
and Mr. Wicker) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to encourage programs to address 
                     college athlete mental health.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Targeting Emotional and Mental 
Stability Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. COLLEGE ATHLETE MENTAL HEALTH.

    Section 520E-2 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 290bb-
36b) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(13) Carrying out one or more school-based programs to 
        address mental health disorders among the college athlete 
        population, including providing access to--
                    ``(A) mental health care services for college 
                athletes, including real-time counseling and telehealth 
                services;
                    ``(B) peer-to-peer counseling;
                    ``(C) existing crisis lifeline services, including 
                the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline;
                    ``(D) training for students, faculty, athletic 
                coaches, and staff to respond effectively to students 
                exhibiting signs of mental distress or substance use 
                disorder; or
                    ``(E) campus-wide education initiatives to address 
                the stigma associated with mental health issues among 
                college athletes.''; and
            (2) in subsection (d), by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) For an institution of higher education proposing to 
        use the grant for an activity described in paragraph (13) of 
        subsection (b), a letter of support from the athletics 
        department of the institution of higher education.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1997 - KYZEN CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         710,778
<SECURITIES>                                    99,208
<RECEIVABLES>                                  810,468
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,068
<INVENTORY>                                    332,367
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,980,800
<PP&E>                                       1,421,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                 493,112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,226,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          730,212
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,068
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,378,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,226,326
<SALES>                                      5,459,846
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,459,846
<CGS>                                        2,684,130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,684,130
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,422,479
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (572,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (572,008)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (572,008)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 10-K

                  Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                      For the year ended December 31, 1998

Commission File Number 0-28350


                  SMITH BARNEY PRINCIPAL PLUS FUTURES FUND L.P.
   -------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

               New York                           13-3823300
     (State or other jurisdiction of                 (I.R.S. Employer
          incorporation or organization)            Identification No.)

                    c/o Smith Barney Futures Management Inc.
                           390 Greenwich St. - 1st Fl.
                            New York, New York 10013
              (Address and Zip Code of principal executive offices)

                                 (212) 723-5424
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Units
                                                            of Limited
                                                            Partnership
                                                            Interest
                                                            (Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the  preceding 12 months (or for such  shorter  period that the  registrant  was
required  to file  such  reports),  and  (2) has  been  subject  to such  filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

                                                          Yes   X    No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent  filers  pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation  S-K is not contained  herein,  and will not be contained,  to the
best of registrant's  knowledge,  in definitive proxy or information  statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
form 10-K [X]

As of February  28,  1999  Limited  Partnership  Units with an  aggregate  value
of  $32,982,360  were  outstanding  and held by non-affiliates.

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
                                      NONE
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 190 (Wednesday, October 1, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 51378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26053]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 25

[IB Docket No. 95-117; FCC 96-425]


Satellite Application and Licensing Procedures

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communication Commission published in the Federal 
Register of February 10, 1997, a document concerning changes to the 
Commission's rules in 47 CFR part 25. Only the introductory text of 
Sec. 25.143(e)(1) should have been corrected and a typographical error 
appeared in Sec. 25.212(c). This document corrects these errors.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Effective upon October 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Campbell, International 
Bureau, Satellite Policy Branch (202) 418-0753.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In December 1996, the Commission adopted 
modifications to its rules in 47 CFR Part 25. On February 10, 1997, a 
summary of the final rules was published in the Federal Register, 62 FR 
5924 (February 10, 1997). This document corrects two errors contained 
in that summary. The amendatory language for Sec. 25.143 in Item 16 was 
incorrect and a typographical error appeared in Sec. 25.212(c) of Item 
20.
    1. The amendatory language of Item 16, page 5930, is corrected to 
read as follows:
    16. Section 25.143(e)(1) is amended by revising the introductory 
sentence to read as follows:


Sec. 25.212  [Corrected]

    2. In Item 20, page 5931, in Sec. 25.212, paragraph (c) is 
corrected to read as follows:
* * * * *
    (c) In the 14 GHz band, an earth station with an equivalent 
diameter of 1.2 meters or greater may be routinely licensed for 
transmission of narrowband analog services with bandwidths up to 200 
kHz if the maximum input power density into the antenna does not exceed 
-8 dBW/4 kHz and the maximum transmitted satellite carrier EIRP density 
does not exceed 13 dBW/4 kHz, and for transmission of narrowband and/or 
wideband digital services, if the maximum input power density into the 
antenna does not exceed -14 dBW/4 kHz and the maximum transmitted 
satellite carrier EIRP density does not exceed +6.0 dBW/4 kHz.

* * * * *
Federal Communications Commission.
Shirley S. Suggs,
Chief, Publications Branch.
[FR Doc. 97-26053 Filed 9-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
# STATE OF LOUl

# 111SIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL, FIRSTCIRCUIT CARROLL JEFFERSON, LARRY JEFFERSON, AND LIONEL JEFFERSON NO. 2022 CW 1341 VERSUS ROSALYN ROBINSON SMITH 

### MAY 8, 

### 2023 In Re: BEFORE: Rosalyn

Judicial 111307. Smith, applying for' supervisory writs,

District Court, Parish of Washington,
I THERIOT, CHUTZ, and HESTER, J~. 22nd 

### No. MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT DENIED.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

FOR THE COURT MRT WRC CHH
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 99-914.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EXTRADITION 

 Treaty Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and GRENADA 

Signed at St. George’s May 30, 1996 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 GRENADA 

 Extradition 

Treaty signed at St. George’s May 30, 1996; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate July 30, 1997 (Treaty Doc. 105-19, 

 105th Congress, 1st Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 October 14, 1998 (Senate Executive Report No. 105-23, 

 105th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 October 21, 1998; 

Ratified by the President January 20, 1999; 

Ratified by Grenada July 8, 1999; 

Exchange of instruments of ratification at St. George’s 

 September 14, 1999; 

Entered into force September 14, 1999.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 4:14-CR-203

:

v. : (Chief Judge Conner)

:

ADAM N. RIEGEL :

PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. As a result of the guilty plea to Count One of the Indictment, and the 

plea agreement entered by defendant, in which the Government sought forfeiture 

pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853, the defendant shall forfeit to the United States 

$52,000.00 in United States currency. 

2. The Court has determined, based upon the defendant’s guilty plea and 

the plea agreement, that the above property is subject to forfeiture and that the 

government has established the requisite nexus between such property and such 

offenses. 

3. After the disposition of any motion filed under Fed. R.Crim. 

P. 32.2(c)(1)(A) and before a hearing on the petition, discovery may be conducted in 

accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure upon a showing that such 

discovery is necessary or desirable to resolve factual issues. 

Case 4:14-cr-00203-CCC Document 38 Filed 01/21/15 Page 1 of 2
2

4. The United States shall have clear title to the subject property 

following the Court’s disposition of all third-party interests, or, if none, following the 

expiration of the period provided in 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(1) for the filing of third party 

petitions. 

5. Upon adjudication of all third-party interests, this Court will enter a 

Final Order of Forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(1), in which all interests will 

be addressed. 

6. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order, and to amend 

it as necessary, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(e). 

7. The Clerk of Court shall forward four certified copies of this order to 

Assistant U.S. Attorney James T. Clancy, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Middle District of 

Pennsylvania. 

SO ORDERED this 21st day of January, 2015.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania

Case 4:14-cr-00203-CCC Document 38 Filed 01/21/15 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:05-cv-00213-MBC-SPB Document 16 Filed 02/28/06 Page 1 of 2Case 1:05-cv-00213-MBC-SPB Document 16 Filed 02/28/06 Page 2 of 2
November 15, 2001


Stephanie L. Brady
c/o Intercallnet, Inc.
6340 NW 5th Way
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309

Re:  Repayment of Payroll

Dear Ms. Brady;

Please accept this letter as the official terms and conditions surrounding the
payroll deferral between you and Intercallnet, Inc. (the Company). You have
agreed to defer drawing payroll from the Company commencing with the payroll
period dated November 23, 2001 which represents the two week pay period ended
November 16,2001. Such payroll deferral will continue until the Company's cash
flow is sufficient to support the payment of payroll to you, as an executive of
the Company, but shall continue no longer than through December 31, 2001.
Interest shall accrue at a rate of prime plus 2% on a bi-weekly basis to be
calculated over the time period that such deferred amounts are outstanding.

When the Company's cash flow is sufficient to support the payment of payroll to
you as an executive, then bi-weekly payroll shall resume. At such time, the
total amount of the deferred payroll (including accrued interest) will be
reviewed and the repayment terms will be determined as either a lump sum
repayment or scheduled payments over a specific time period depending on the
financial condition of the Company.



Sincerely,                                       Accepted By:

/s/ George A. Pacinelli                          /s/ Stephanie L. Brady
---------------------------                      -------------------------------
George A. Pacinelli                              Stephanie L. Brady
President                                        Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 99.2


                        REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of AirTouch Communications, Inc.:

We have audited the consolidated statements of income, stockholder's equity, and
cash flows for AirTouch Communications, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company")
for the period ended December 31, 1994. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the
1994 financial statements of Mannesmann Mobilfunk GmbH ("MMO"), an equity
investee of the Company, which statements reflect net income of $69,072,000 for
the year ended December 31, 1994. Those statements were audited by other
auditors whose reports have been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it
relates to the amounts included for MMO, is based solely on the reports of the
other auditors.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits and the reports of other auditors provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, based on our audits and the reports of other auditors, the
consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated results of their operations and their cash
flows for the period ended December 31, 1994, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles.

We have also audited the Supplementary Selected Proportionate Financial Data for
the period ended December 31, 1994, presented on Page 54, certain of which data
includes amounts derived from financial statements of MMO, which statements are
audited by other auditors as stated above. As described on Page 55, the
Supplementary Selected Proportionate Financial Data have been prepared by
management to present relevant financial information that is not provided by the
consolidated financial statement and is not intended to be a presentation in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

In our opinion, the Supplementary Selected Proportionate Financial Data referred
to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein on the basis of accounting described on Page 55.

/s/ Coopers and Lybrand L.L.P.
San Francisco, California
March 13, 1995
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.24
                        [LETTERHEAD OF SOUTHTRUST BANK]

August 13, 2001

Mr. Morris E. Van Asperen
CFO
Color Imaging, Inc.
4350 Peachtree Industrial Blvd.
Suite 100
Norcross, Georgia 30071

RE:    Loan and Security Agreement (the "Loan Agreement") dated as of May 5,
       2000, as amended, among SouthTrust Bank ("Lender") and collectively as
       "Borrower", Color Image, Inc., Color Imaging, Inc., Logical Imaging
       Solutions, Inc. and Alorex Corp.

Dear Van:

Please refer to the above referenced Loan Agreement. All capitalized terms used
herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Loan Agreement.

Borrower has requested Lender to waive the right to exercise Lenders remedies
under the Loan Documents in regard to Borrower's violation of certain financial
covenants contained in Article VI of the loan Agreement for the quarter ended
June 30, 2001.

Lender, subject to the terms of this letter, agrees to waive the right to
exercise its remedies solely for the following covenant defaults (collectively,
the "Specified Defaults") occurring as of June 30, 2001:

1.   Breach of Financial Covenant to maintain a minimum Fixed Charge Ratio of
     1.20:1; and

2.   Breach of Financial Covenant to maintain a maximum ratio of Funded Debt to
     EBITDA of not more than 4.0:1.

Except to the extent set forth herein, the Loan Agreement together with all
other documents remain in full force and effect without amendment or waiver.
Further, this waiver constitutes a waiver of the specific violations and dates
listed herein and does not constitute a waiver of any future violations of the
Loan Agreement. The bank retains its rights and remedies under the loan
documents with respect to any future defaults.

<PAGE>

Color Imaging, Inc.
Financial Covenant Waiver
August 13, 2001





/s/ Scott M. Smith
--------------------
Scott M. Smith
Commercial Loan Officer

                         [LOGO] SouthTrust Bank, N.A.
#### Richard BETTERIN, Appellant, v. Joseph LIQUORI et al., Appellees.

No. 71-88.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 13, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2262

MICHAEL W. MCRAE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE STATE OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND CLASSIFIED

EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA98-2271-S)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael W. McRae, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael W. McRae appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Because the appeal is frivolous, we deny leave to proceed in forma

pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See McRae v. Maryland, No. CA-98-2271-S (D. Md. Aug. 7,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED