alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26682]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Social, Behavioral, and Economic 
Sciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Public Law 
92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Social, Behavioral, and Economic 
Sciences (1766).
    Date and Time: October 28, 1997; 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 375, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: M. Marge Machen, Project Officer, Division of 
Science Resources Studies, Research and Development Statistics 
Program, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Suite 965, Arlington, VA 22230, 
Telephone: (703) 306-1772, ext. 6934, Fax: (703) 306-0508, Internet: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#315c5c505259545f715f42571f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fa97979b99929f94ba94899cd49d958c">[email protected]</span></a>
    Minutes may be obtained from the contact person at the above 
address.
    Purpose of Meeting: To review and comment on issues affecting 
the annual Survey of Science and Engineering Research and 
Development Expenditures at Universities and Colleges.
    Agenda: Discussion on multidisciplinary research; Federal funds 
for R&D expenditures by agency and by field; and non-science and 
engineering R&D expenditures.

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26682 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3041 

To reinstate certain sanctions imposed with respect to Iran. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 16, 2023 

Mr. COTTON (for himself, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mrs. BRITT, 

Mrs. CAPITO, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DAINES, Ms. 

ERNST, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. HAGERTY, Mr. 

HAWLEY, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. 

RICKETTS, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. 

SULLIVAN, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mr. VANCE, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

BOOZMAN, Mr. BUDD, Mr. BRAUN, and Mr. YOUNG) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To reinstate certain sanctions imposed with respect to Iran. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT OF CERTAIN SANCTIONS IM4 POSED WITH RESPECT TO IRAN. 

5 Any statutory sanctions imposed with respect to Iran 

6 pursuant to section 1244(c)(1) or 1247(a) of the Iran 

7 Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 (22 

8 U.S.C. 8803(c)(1) and 8806(a)), or section 1245(d)(1) of 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3041 IS

1 the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8513a(d)(1)), that were waived, sus3 pended, reduced, or otherwise relieved pursuant to an 

4 agreement between the United States and the Islamic Re5 public of Iran, including any waiver that is the subject 

6 of the document entitled ‘‘Waiver of Sanctions with Re7 spect to the Transfer of Funds from the Republic of Korea 

8 to Qatar’’ and transmitted to Congress on September 11, 

9 2023, are hereby reinstated and any action by the United 

10 States Government to facilitate the release of funds or as11 sets to Iran pursuant to such agreement, or provide any 

12 further waiver, suspension, reduction, or other relief pur13 suant to such agreement, is hereby prohibited. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

      We consent to the references to our reserve report as of February 1, 2003,
and to the use of our name in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TransTexas Gas
Corporation for the year ended January 31, 2003 in the form and context in which
they appear.

                                 NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.

                               By:            /s/ DANNY D. SIMMONS
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                             Danny D. Simmons
                                             Executive Vice President

Houston, Texas
May 1, 2003

                                       39
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26825]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Review of a Revised 
Information Collection: Form RI 38-31

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public 
Law 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) intends to submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget a request for review of a revised information 
collection. RI 38-31, Request for Information About Your Missing 
Payment, is sent in response to a notification by an individual of the 
loss or non-receipt of a payment from the Civil Service Retirement and 
Disability Fund. The form requests the information needed to enable the 
OPM to trace and or reissue payment.
    Approximately 998 RI 38-31 forms will be completed annually. We 
estimate it takes approximately 11 minutes to complete the form. The 
annual burden is 183 hours.
    Comments are particularly invited on:

--whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of functions of the Office of Personnel Management, and 
whether it will have practical utility;
--whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection is 
accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; and
--ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on those who are to respond, through use of the appropriate 
technological collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.

    For copies of this proposal, contact Jim Farron on (202) 418-3208, 
or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ff9592999e8d8d9091bf908f92d1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c16111a1d0e0e13123c130c11521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 60 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--Lorraine E. Dettman, 
Chief,Operations Support Division, Retirement and Insurance Service, 
U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW, Room 3349 
Washington, DC 20415.
FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION CONTACT: Mary 
Beth Smith-Toomey, Management Services Division, (202) 606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Janice R. Lachance,
Acting Director.
[FR Doc. 97-26825 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 99.4
                       SECRETARY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report of The Bralorne Mining Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Liu,  Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Secretary Treasurer and
Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my  knowledge  and  belief:

     (1)  the  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.




                                /s/ "Michael Liu"
                               -------------------
                                  Michael  Liu
                Chief  Accounting  Officer,  Chief  Financial Officer
                         Secretary  Treasurer  and  Director

Date: October 19, 2004
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Nicklebys.com,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  September  30,  2004,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'),  I, Bruce
Capra, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Bruce Capra
----------------------------------------
Bruce Capra
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2004































                                       14
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-1613

ABDALKARIM S. M. QANDEEL; MAISAA MOHD AMEEN KAME ALHINDI,

 Petitioners,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH,

 Respondent.

No. 14-2411

ABDALKARIM S. M. QANDEEL; MAISAA MOHD AMEEN KAME ALHINDI,

 Petitioners,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH,

 Respondent.

On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: July 20, 2015 Decided: July 30, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
2

Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ira J. Kurzban, KURZBAN KURZBAN WEINGER TETZELI & PRATT, P.A., 

Miami, Florida, for Petitioners. Benjamin C. Mizer, Acting 

Assistant Attorney General, Carl McIntyre, Assistant Director, 

Margaret A. O’Donnell, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Abdulkarim S.M. Qandeel, a stateless Palestinian, and his 

wife, derivative beneficiary Maisaa Mohd Ameen Kame Alhindi, a 

native of Saudi Arabia and a citizen of Jordan, petition for 

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) 

dismissing their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s denial of 

Qandeel’s requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and 

protection under the Convention Against Torture. Petitioners 

also seek review of the Board’s order denying their motion to 

reopen. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the 

transcript of Qandeel’s merits hearing, his asylum application, 

and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record 

evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the 

administrative findings of fact, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) 

(2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s 

decision denying relief from removal. See INS v. 

Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). We further find that 

the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to 

reopen. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992).

Accordingly, we deny the petitions for review for the 

reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Qandeel (B.I.A. May 30 

& Dec. 16, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
4

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

PETITIONS DENIED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JERMAINE WEEKS, :

:

Petitioner :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-15-2211

:

CYNTHIA LINK, : (Judge Brann)

:

Respondent :

ORDER

January 7, 2016

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1. In accordance with the Petitioner’s Notice of Election (Doc. 6)

to discontinue this action, the instant petition is DEEMED

WITHDRAWN.

2. DISMISSAL IS WITHOUT PREJUDICE and Weeks may

file another § 2254 petition raising all grounds for relief from

his conviction within the one (1) year statutory period

prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). 

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

1

Case 4:15-cv-02211-MWB-JVW Document 8 Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 2
4. There is no basis for the issuance of a Certificate of

Appealability.

5. Petitioner’s motion (Doc. 5) seeking appointment of counsel is

DISMISSED AS MOOT.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

2

Case 4:15-cv-02211-MWB-JVW Document 8 Filed 01/07/16 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 12.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I,
Luis Pacheco de Melo, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the company and have:



5.     The
company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors
and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
April 16, 2010

By:

/s/ LUIS PACHECO DE MELOName:

Luis Pacheco de MeloTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### U. S. PLYWOOD-CHAMPION PAPERS, INC., an Ohio corporation, Appellant, v. Willis V. McCALL, as Sheriff of Lake County, Florida, and Walter E. Heller & Company of Florida, a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 69-618.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 24, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Barry Wayne BROWN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-434.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 4, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 12.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I,
Luis Pacheco de Melo, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the company and have:



5.     The
company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors
and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
April 30, 2013

By:

/s/ LUIS PACHECO DE MELOName:

Luis Pacheco de MeloTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
district court dismissed the petition without prejudice because the petition

was not "brought to trial" within 5 years as required by NRCP 41(e).

We conclude that the district court erred in dismissing appellant's petition pursuant to NRCP 41(e). There is no requirement under NRS Chapter 34 for a petitioner to take further action after the filing of the petition. Rather, NRS Chapter 34 places the obligation on the
district court to take the next action. See, e.g., NRS 34.740 (requiring the clerk of the court to present the original petition promptly to a district judge); NRS 34.745(1) (requiring the district judge to determine whether an evidentiary hearing is required after reviewing the return, answer, and all supporting documents which are filed).

We nevertheless affirm the dismissal of the petition because appellant failed to demonstrate a violation of due process in connection with the prison disciplinary hearing. See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298, 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (holding that a correct result will not be reversed simply because it is based on the wrong reason). In his petition, appellant claimed that the rule he violated did not specify •what constitutes prohibited or unauthorized use, his behavior did not constitute an offense, and the disciplinary hearing officer was biased because he was a personal friend of a correctional officer who was disciplined based on an investigation initiated by appellant. Appellant failed to demonstrate a violation of due process because he did not allege that he was deprived of advance written notice of the charges, a written statement of the evidence relied upon and the reasons for disciplinary action, or a qualified right to call witnesses and present evidence. Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-69 (1974). The record indicates that some evidence supports the

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947Aaz---S 7 61c 

### Parraguirre decision by the prison disciplinary hearing officer, Superintendent u. Hill, 

### 472 U.S. 445, 455 (1985), and appellant failed to demonstrate that the hearing officer was not impartial. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

J. Saitta

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Frank Milford Peck Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 

### 3

(0) 1947A aelp
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.34


                     EXECUTIVE FINANCIAL COUNSELING PROGRAM

General Description of Services

The Company offers a financial counseling program to executives.  Participants
may select from two financial counseling firms utilized by the Company:  The
AYCO Company and Asset Management Group.  The executive is then assigned a
counselor from the chosen firm who works with the executive over time to provide
services including:

                  COMPANY PROVIDED BENEFITS PLANNING

                  ESTATE PLANNING

                  INSURANCE PLANNING

                  INVESTMENT PLANNING

                  INCOME TAX PLANNING

In addition to the above services, the Program covers the cost of personal
income tax preparation.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5229-5230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2708]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5683-9]


Notice of Modification to 1994 Publicker Site Purchaser Agreement 
Pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and 
Liability Act of 1980, as Amended

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that on December 19, 1996, the United 
States Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'') made effective a 
Modification to the 1994 purchaser agreement concerning the Publicker 
Industries Inc. Superfund Site located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 
The purchaser agreement, which was executed on June 23, 1994, became 
effective on December 5, 1994 after a public comment period. The 
Modification, which was also executed by Delaware Avenue Enterprises, 
Inc., Cresmont Limited Partnership, Holt Cargo Systems, Inc. 
(collectively, the ``Purchasers'') and the Pennsylvania Department of 
Environmental Protection (``PADEP'), essentially approves the petition 
of the Purchasers to perform, with EPA oversight, the final, site-wide 
CERCLA remedy as selected by EPA in the December 28, 1995 Record of 
Decision (the ``ROD'' for Operable Unit 3, or ``OU3 ROD''). The 
original purchaser agreement provided for this petition process, which 
enables the Purchasers to conduct an EPA-approved CERCLA remediation in 
an expeditious and cost-efficient manner.
    Briefly, the OU3 ROD selected the abandonment of on-site ground 
water wells; the removal, treatment, and off-

[[Page 5230]]

site disposal of liquids and sediments in contaminated electric 
utilities; the removal, treatment, and off-site disposal of liquids and 
sediments in contaminated stormwater trenches and utilities; and the 
removal, treatment, and off-site disposal of miscellaneous wastes. In 
exchange for this privately-performed remediation and as provided for 
in the purchaser agreement, EPA and PADEP will evaluate the Purchasers' 
costs related to the implementation of the OU3 ROD and will determine 
the dollar value of the offsets to Purchasers' future cash payment 
installment obligations under the purchaser agreement.

    Availability: The Modification and additional background 
information relating to the original purchaser agreement are available 
for public inspection at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian M. Nishitani (3RC21), Senior 
Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 841 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, 
Pennsylvania 19107, (215) 566-2675.

    Dated: January 28, 1997.
W. Michael McCabe,
Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
III.
[FR Doc. 97-2708 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### DIESEL TANKER J. A. MARTIN, INC., Petitioner, v. KEY BISCAYNE BANK, Respondent.

No. 40773.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 6, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 242 So.2d 727.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, CARLTON and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.