alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  HMH
Properties,  Inc. and Subsidiaries  Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated
Statements  of  Operations  as of and for the year ended  January 3, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000905038
<NAME>                        HMH Properties, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000
<CURRENCY>                                     $
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jan-3-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Dec-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jan-3-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         108
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         1,148
<DEPRECIATION>                                 204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        732
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,285
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               216
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             69
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                34
<INCOME-TAX>                                   14
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            20
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   20
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        




</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1900 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to stabilize the amount 

of the medicare part B premium. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 20, 2005 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. LAUTENBERG, 

and Mr. CORZINE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to stabilize 

the amount of the medicare part B premium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep the Promise of 

5 Medicare Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STABILIZATION OF MEDICARE PART B PREMIUM. 

7 Section 1839(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 1395r(a)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the 

9 following new sentence: ‘‘Notwithstanding the preceding 

10 sentences, the monthly premium rate determined under 
2 

•S 1900 IS

1 this paragraph for each month in 2006 may not exceed 

2 an amount equal to the monthly premium rate determined 

3 under this paragraph for each month in 2005 adjusted 

4 by the percentage change in the average Consumer Price 

5 Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers 

6 (CPI–W) for the third quarter of 2004 to the third quar7 ter of 2005.’’. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2666]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[OR-958-0777-54; GP6-0216; OR-22221 (WA)]


Public Land Order No. 7240; Revocation of Secretarial Order Dated 
June 28, 1943; Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public Land Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order revokes in its entirety a Secretarial order which 
withdrew 4.25 acres of public land for the Bureau of Land Management's 
Powersite Classification No. 342. The land is no longer needed for the 
purpose for which it was withdrawn. The land is included in another 
existing withdrawal and remains closed to surface entry and mining. The 
land has been and remains open to mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 4, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Betty McCarthy, BLM Oregon/Washington 
State Office, P.O. Box 2965, Portland, Oregon 97208-2965, 503-952-6155.
    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
by Section 204 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 
43 U.S.C. 1714 (1988), it is ordered as follows:
    1. The Secretarial Order dated June 28, 1943, which established 
Powersite Classification No. 342, is hereby revoked in its entirety:

Willamette Meridian

T. 11 N., R. 4 E.,
    Sec. 2, lot 1.

    The area described contains 4.25 acres in Lewis County.

    2. The land is included in Power Project No. 2016 and remains 
withdrawn from operation of the public land laws, including the mining 
laws. The land has been and continues to be open to applications and 
offers under the mineral leasing laws.

    Signed: January 23, 1997.
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 97-2666 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-257]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meetings:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research #1203.
    Dates and Times: 1/28-29/97, 8:00 am-6:00pm and 1/30-31/97, 
8:am-5:00pm
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Rooms 
320 & 340 and 380 & 390, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Ulrich Strom, Program Director, Division of 
Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230; Telephone (703) 306-1832.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning CAREER proposals submitted to the Condensed Matter 
Physics Program.
    Agenda: Evaluation of career proposals.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed includes 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data such as salaries, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b (c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 2, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-257 Filed 1-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
```
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, James A. Prestiano, the President and sole officer of Hartscup Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002, to which this certification accompanies (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(b) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 19, 2002


                                              /s/ James A. Prestiano
                                              -----------------------------
                                              James A. Prestiano, President
EXHIBIT 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF SHILOH INDUSTRIES, INC.

The
following is a list of the subsidiaries of Shiloh Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Corporation). The common stock of all the corporations listed below is wholly owned, directly or indirectly, by the Corporation. If indented,
the Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of the corporation under which it is listed unless otherwise noted.



|                                                       |  |                      
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------
|NAME OF CORPORATION                                    |  | STATE OFINCORPORATION
|Shiloh Corporation                                     |  | Ohio                 
|The Sectional Die Company                              |  | Ohio                 
|Sectional Stamping, Inc.                               |  | Ohio                 
|Medina Blanking, Inc.(1)                               |  | Ohio                 
|Liverpool Coil Processing, Incorporated                |  | Ohio                 
|VCS Properties, LLC                                    |  | Ohio                 
|Greenfield Die & Manufacturing Corp.                   |  | Michigan             
|Shiloh Incorporated                                    |  | Michigan             
|C & H Design Company                                   |  | Michigan             
|Jefferson Blanking Inc.                                |  | Georgia              
|Shiloh Automotive, Inc.                                |  | Ohio                 
|Shiloh de Mexico S.A. de C.V.(2)                       |  | Mexico               
|Shiloh International S.A. de C.V.(3)                   |  | Mexico               
|Shiloh Industries, Inc. Dickson Manufacturing Division |  | Tennessee            



|(1) | Medina Blanking, Inc. is 22% owned by the Corporation and 78% owned by Shiloh Corporation.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Shiloh de Mexico S.A. de C.V. is owned 99% by the Corporation and 1% by Medina Blanking, Inc.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | Shiloh International S.A. de C.V. is owned 98% by the Corporation and 2% by Shiloh de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### VERMILION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry J. BROUSSARD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 6260.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Feb. 6, 1978.

Mouton, Roy, Carmpuche, Hill, Bivens & NcNamara by John K. Hill, Jr, Lafayette, for defendant-appellant.

Cooper & Sonnier by Charles R. Sonnier, Abbeville, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CULPEPPER, DOMENGEAUX and WATSON, JJ.

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

This ig a companion ease to the matter entitled *“Vermilion Corporation v. Norman Vaughn”,*No. 6258 on the docket of this court, 356 So.2d 551.

For the reasons assigned therein the judgment of the district court enjoining the defendant from using plaintiff’s property without permission is affirmed at appellant’s costs.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21

                          MATRIX CAPITAL CORPORATION

                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant

1.  Matrix Financial Services Corporation - Incorporated in Arizona

2.  United Financial, Inc. - Incorporated in Colorado

3.  Matrix Capital Bank - Organized pursuant to a Federal savings and loan
     charter

4.  United Special Services, Inc. - Incorporated in Colorado

5.  United Capital Markets, Inc. - Incorporated in Colorado

6.  The Vintage Group Inc. - Incorporated in Texas

7.  Vintage Delaware Holdings, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware, wholly owned
      subsidiary of The Vintage Group Inc.

8.  Sterling Trust Company - Incorporated in Texas, wholly owned subsidiary of
      Vintage Delaware Holdings, Inc.

9.  First Matrix Investment Services Corp. - Incorporated in Texas, wholly owned
      subsidiary of Vintage Delaware Holdings, Inc.

10.  Matrix Funding Corp. - Incorporated in Colorado, wholly owned subsidiary of
       Matrix Financial Services Corporation
# Sheet1

# Sheet4
Exhibit 32.2 - Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Communications of America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the "Report").

I, David R. Pressler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David R. Pressler
--------------------------
    David R. Pressler
    CEO President and Director


Date  August 15, 2006
      -----------------
June 15, 2015 

Mr. Ted Collins 

665 Ferguson Court 

Dixon, CA 95620 

Dear Mr. Collins: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 8, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1244), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
Case 1:06-cv-00010-MBC-SPB Document 16 Filed 10/05/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26680]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Engineering Education and Centers; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel Engineering Education and Centers 
(#173).
    Date/Time: October 27-28 1997, 8:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 360, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Janet Rutledge, Program Director, Engineering 
Education and Centers Division, National Science Foundation, Room 
585, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the 
Research Experiences for Undergraduates Program as part of the 
selection process for awards.
    Reason For Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b. (c)(4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26680 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT

U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585 Tuesday, September 23, 2008 9 a.m. - 5 p.m. ET, Room 8E-089



## Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) will receive comments on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) and the proposed standards as stated in the notice. In addition, DOE will present the methodology used for the NO PR analysis and example results. The Department will present its plans for the remaining analysis—the analysis to support the Final Rule—and will seek input from stakeholders on the methodologies, assumptions, data sources and analysis results.



## Agenda

9:00-9:05 am Welcome

9:05-9:15 am Opening Remarks, In troductions and Agenda Review Doug Brookman

9:15-9:30 am Rulemaking Overview

Charles Llenza Overview of the analyses in the rulemaking, the tools DOE uses to generate results for each analysis, and the issues on which DOE would like input during today’s meeting.

9:30-10:00 am Comments from Participants Doug Brookman Open forum for participants to make a brief summary statement and/or identify thei r key issues regarding the NOPR analyses, methods, data, and results.

10:00-11:00 am Engineering Analysis

Aris Marantan and Matt Millard Summary presentation and di scussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the market and technology assessment, screeni ng analysis, and engineering analysis, and a characterization of the results.

11:00-11:15 am Break2 11:15 am-12:00 pm Energy Use Analysis and Life-Cycle Cost Analysis

Dave Winiarski Summary presentation and di scussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the markups to determine equipment price analysis, energy use analysis, life-cycle cost and payback period analyses, and a

characterization of the results.

12:00-1:00 pm Break for Lunch (on your own)

1:00-1:30 pm National Impact Analysis

Dave Winiarski Summary presentation and di scussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the national energy savings, net present value, and shipments analysis,

and a characterization of the results.

1:30- 2:15 Trial Standard Levels and Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Dave Winiarski and Aris Marantan Summary presentation and di scussion regarding trial

standard levels and the a pproach used, factors to consider for the manufacturer impact analysis.

2:15-2:45 Utility Impact Analys is, Employment Impact Analysis, Environmental Assessment, Regulatory Impact Analysis

Dave Winiarski Summary presentation a nd discussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the utility, employment, environmental, regulatory analyses and a

characterization of the results.

2:45-3:15 pm Break

3:15-3:45 pm Discussi on of Other Issues Doug Brookman Open forum to discuss any re maining questions or issues identified by participants.

3:45-4:30 pm Next Steps and Closing Remarks

Charles Llenza Participants will discuss outstanding issues and concluding

remarks.

4:30 pm Adjourn
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ LARRY J. CANTY , Claimant

- Appellant,

v. Eric K. S hinseki, SECRETARY OF VETERAN S AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee.

__________________________
201 3-7 053

__________________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in N o. 11

- 1521, Judge William A. Moo rman

.

__________________________

Before R ADER , Chief Judge , D YK a nd W ALLACH , Circuit Judges

.

P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R
On February 11, 2013 order, the court directed the parties to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. Larry J. Canty has not responded to the order. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs responds. Case: 13-7053 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 04/25/2013L ARRY CANTY v. SHINSEKI 2
On November 7 , 2012 , the United States Court of A ppeals for Veterans Claim s entered judgment in Canty’s

case

. The court received Canty ’s notice of appeal on January 16 , 201 3
, 70 days after the date of judgment. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be received by the Court of Ap peals for Veterans Claims within 60 days of the entry of judgment. See 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The statutory deadline for taking an appeal to this court is jurisdictio nal, mandatory, and cannot be waived. See B owles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007) ; see also Henderson v. Shinseki , 131 S. Ct. 1197, 1204

- 05 (2011) (the language of Section 729 2(a) “clearly signals an intent” to impose the same jurisdictional restrictions on an appeal from the Veterans Court to the Federal Circuit as imposed on appeals from a district court to a court of appeals). Because Canty’s appeal as to the underlying judgment was filed outside of the statutory deadline for taking an appeal to this court, we must dismiss the appeal Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The appeal is dismissed

. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs

. F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s 26 Case: 13-7053 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 04/25/2013