alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Transource Computers, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W91QUZ-06-D-0006 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59458 

Heather A. James, Esq. 

Whiteford, Taylor & Preston L.L.P. 

Washington, DC 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Michael G. Pond, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 23 October 2014 

~~- Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59458, Appeal ofTransource 

Computers, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26679]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research; Notice of Sunshine 
Act Meeting

NAME AND COMMITTEE CODE: Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research 
#1203.

DATE AND TIME: October 27, 1997, 8 am-5 pm.

PLACE: Room 380, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230.

TYPE OF MEETING: Closed.

TYPE OF PROPOSAL: Career Proposals in Polymers.

CONTACT PERSON: Dr. Andrew J. Lovinger, Senior Staff Associate, 
Division of Materials Research, Room 1065, 703-306-1839.

PURPOSE OF MEETING: To provide advice and recommendations concerning 
proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.

AGENDA: To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the Directorate 
as part of the selection process for awards.

REASON FOR CLOSING: The proposals being reviewed includes information 
of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical 
information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are 
exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the 
Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26679 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Ex parte Gabriel HAGENDORFER.

SC 2710.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 26, 1977.

BEATTY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, FAULKNER and SHORES, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26757]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Surrender of License

October 3, 1997.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Surrender of License.
    b. Project No.: 1473-013.
    c. Date Filed: August 28, 1997.
    d. Applicant: Granite County.
    e. Name of Project: Flint Creek.
    f. Location: On Flint Creek, in Deer Lodge and Granite Counties, 
Montana.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 USC Section 791(a)-
825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Allen A. Morrison, Chairman, Board of County 
Commissioners, Granite County, P.O. Box B, Philipsburg, MT 59858, (406) 
859-3771.
    i. FERC Contact: Regina Saizan, (202) 219-2673.
    j. Comment Date: November 17, 1997.
    k. Description of Application: The licensee seeks to surrender its 
license because rehabilitation of the project is uneconomical.
    l. This notice also consists of the following standard paragraphs: 
B, C1, and D.
    B. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene--Anyone may submit 
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211, 
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission 
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who 
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules 
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or 
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified 
comment date for the particular application.
    C1. Filing and Service Responsive Documents--Any filings must bear 
in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 
TERMS AND CONDITIONS'', ``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as 
applicable, and the Project Number of the particular application to 
which the filing refers. Any of the above-named documents must be filed 
by providing the original and the number of copies provided by the 
Commission's regulations to: The Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. A copy of any 
motion to intervene must also be served upon each representative of the 
Applicant specified in the particular application.
    D2. Agency Comments--Federal, state, and local agencies are invited 
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the 
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If 
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing 
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an 
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26757 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Page
                                               Exhibit 23.1

              Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
Atlantic Coast Airlines Holdings, Inc.:

We   consent   to   incorporation  by  reference   in   the
registration statements (No. 333-66265, 333-15795  and  33-
67492)  on  Form  S-8 of Atlantic Coast Airlines  Holdings,
Inc. of our report dated January 26, 2000, relating to  the
consolidated  balance  sheets of  Atlantic  Coast  Airlines
Holdings,  Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1999,  and  the
related     consolidated    statements    of    operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the  years
in  the  three-year period ended December 31,  1999,  which
report  appears in the December 31, 1999, annual report  on
Form 10-K of Atlantic Coast Airlines, Holdings, Inc.

Our  report refers to a change, effective January 1,  1999,
in  the  Company's  method of accounting  for  preoperating
costs.

KPMG LLP


McLean, Virginia
March 27, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Fairfield
Manufacturing Co., Inc's 1997 Form 10-K/A and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such Form 10-K/A filing and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000904543
<NAME> FAIRFIELD MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,059
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (600)
<INVENTORY>                                     23,875
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,048
<PP&E>                                         153,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                (84,301)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,891
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           47,850
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                    (52,270)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,212
<SALES>                                        192,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,281
<CGS>                                          157,715
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  174,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    80
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,821
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,640
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,181
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,181
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)
        

</TABLE>
March 23, 2015

Mr. John Cassel

879 Jonathan Drive

Telford, PA 18969

Dear Mr. Cassel:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your January 9, 2015 exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0043), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of 

the relief you seek.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9521.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 32.2 - Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of RPM Advantage, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
thereof (the "Report").

I, David R. Pressler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David R. Pressler
--------------------------
    David R. Pressler
    CEO President and Director


Date  April 25, 2011
      -----------------
#### Sheldon COOK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-524.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 20, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 28, 1978.

Engel, Aronson, Fried & Cohn and Don S. Cohn, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and James H. Greason, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of *State ex rel. D’Amato v. Morphonios,*358 So.2d 575 (Fla.3d DCA 1978) (No. 77-1954, opinion filed May 4, 1978).
TEST REPORT Analysis Nr. : 294549

.

Received on : 31.05.94 Account Nr. : 

Project : SAN 582

Product/Step : Prod. Nr. :

Local Nr. :

Reason : tel quel :YES

Description : CONCENTRATED ORGANIC STREAM see.Anal.Nr. :

Appearance : PASTE (HIGHLY VISCOUS) , DARK BROWN

TEST-REPORT

DSC

- EXOTHEBMIC REACTION STARTING AT

- SPONTANEOUS EXOTHERMIC REACTION

- ENTHALPY (EXOTHERMIC) LARGER THAN

- ENDOTHERMIC REACTION STARTING AT

- SAMPLE TUBE

’ SEDF~X ISOPERIBOLIC

BOO c

NO

97

210:C

STAINLESS STEEL PRESSURE

CRUCIBLE (CLOSED UNDER ARGON)

- EXPOSURE TIME

- TF~LOERATURE

EXOTHERM OBSERVED

- ATMOSPHERE

- FREE GAS VOLUME APPROX.

- SAMPLE TUBE

APPEARANCE OF THE SABLE AFfER THE TEST

19 h

I00 C

NO

ARGON, CLOSED

25 % DES GEFAESSVOLUMENS

50 ML MIDIALvfOCLAVE WITH GLASS

WALLS

5q~C}L~NGED

SEDEX ISOPERIBOLIC

- EXPOSURE TIME

- TF~PERATURE

EXOTHERM OBSERVED

- ATMOSPHERE

- FREE GAS VOLUME APPROX.

- SA~LE TUBE

APPEARANCE OF THE SAMPLE AFTER THE TEST

24 h

i00 C

NO

AIR, CLOSED

25 ~ DES GEFAESSVOLUMENS

50 ML MIDIAUTOCLAVE WITH GLASS

WALLS

UNCH~GED

D COMMENT

Under inert atmosphere, no exothermal reaction was detected in the rsnge of the

jacket-temperature of 50 C.
2,94.34~ SAN 582 ST,

8.040 mg Rate: 5.0 "C/mln

A.T File: 02037.00{ DSC METTLER 07-Jun-94

Ident: 24349.0 GraphWare TA72PS.5

Integration

97.3 J/g

Peak 339.2"C

o.~ w

,

Integratib’n ’

Delta H 76 mJ

9.5 J/g

Peak 270.8"C

-o.o W/g

~00. 200. 300. 400.
~5-JUN-94 8:58 Page

21.57 g SAN 582 S NCENTRATED ORGANIC STREAN1

2°0°

~9 h bei ~00 C

0

ZeSt [m~n]
ONCENTRATED ORGANIC STREAM]

2*5"

2.0-

0.0"

21 h bei 100 C

Zeit [mln)
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No

. 201 600404

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v. 

### NICHOLAS R. FAIRBROTHER Gunner’s Mate First Class (E

- 6 ), U.S. Navy

Appellant

__________________

_______ Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Bethany L. Payton

- O’Brien
, JAGC, US N

. Convening Authority: C ommanding Officer, Naval Air Station, Lemoore, CA

. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenan t Co mmander

Matthew S. Bailey, JAG, USN

. For Appellant : Lieutenant Kurt W. Siegal
, JAGC, USN

.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ Decided 21 September 2017

_________________________ Before H UTCHISON , F ULTON , and S AYEGH , Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.3

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (No. 33-62787); Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No.  333-03107)
and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-57083, 33-57077,
33-57081, 33-64553, 333-10389 and 333-17891) of AirTouch Communications, Inc.
of our report dated February 16, 1996, relating to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Cellular Communications, Inc. included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1995.



                                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York
March 20, 1997
#### The STATE of Florida ex rel. David Albert MORRISON, Relator, v. The Honorable Paul BAKER, as Judge of the Criminal Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-337.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 22, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition denied.
```

[104th Congress Public Law 68]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ68.104]

[[Page 109 STAT. 766]]

Public Law 104-68
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the Federal Triangle Project under construction at 14th 
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest, in the District of Columbia, <<NOTE:  
   Dec. 22, 1995 -  [H.R. 2481]>> as the ``Ronald Reagan Building and 
                      International Trade Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 40 USC 1101 note.>> DESIGNATION.

    The Federal Triangle Project under construction at 14th Street and 
Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest, in the District of Columbia, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Ronald Reagan Building and International 
Trade Center''.

SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 40 USC 1101 note.>> REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ronald Reagan Building and 
International Trade Center''.

    Approved December 22, 1995.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2481 (S. 1315):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-414 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):
            Dec. 18, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 20, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Skip Links
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
Data Series 773
>> Pubs Warehouse >DS 773Archive of Digital Boomer Subbottom Data Collected During USGS Cruises 99FGS01 and 99FGS02 Offshore Southeast and Southwest Florida, July and November 1999By Arnell S. Forde, Shawn V. Dadisman, Dana S. Wiese, Daniel C. PhelpsSummary
In July (19 - 26) and November (17 - 18) of 1999, the USGS, in cooperation with the       Florida Geological Survey (FGS), conducted two geophysical       surveys in: (1) the Atlantic Ocean offshore of Florida's east coast from       Orchid to Jupiter, FL, and (2) the Gulf of Mexico offshore of Venice, FL.       This report serves as an archive of unprocessed digital boomer subbottom       data, trackline maps, navigation files, GIS files, Field Activity       Collection System (FACS) logs, and formal       Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) metadata. Filtered       and gained (showing a relative increase in signal amplitude) digital       images of the subbottom profiles are also provided.

The USGS St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center       (SPCMSC)       assigns a unique identifier to each cruise or field activity. For example,       identifiers 99FGS01 and 99FGS02 refer to field data collected in 1999 for       cooperative work with the FGS. The numbers 01 and 02       indicate the data were collected during the first and second field       activities for that project in that calendar year. Refer to http://walrus.wr.usgs.gov/infobank/programs/html/definition/activity.html       for a detailed description of the method used to assign the field activity       identification (ID).

First posted July 22, 2013
- Data         Series 773  (18.3 KB)

For additional information contact:St.       Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science CenterU.S. Geological Survey       600 Fourth Street SouthSt. Petersburg, FL 33701 http://coastal.er.usgs.gov/

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable       Document Format (PDF); the latest version of Adobe Reader or similar       software is required to view it. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of       charge.
Suggested citation:
Forde, A.S., Dadisman, S.V., Wiese, D.S., and Phelps, D.C., 2013, Archive of digital boomer subbottom data collected during USGS cruises 99FGS01 and 99FGS02 offshore southeast and southwest Florida, July and November, 1999: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 773, 1 DVD, http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/773. 
Contents
Information Statement

System Requirements

Getting Started

Disc Organization

Project Summary

Acknowledgments 

References Cited

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/773/Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Monday, July 22, 2013, 02:41:13 PM
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GenTek Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Richard R.
Russell, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Matthew R. Friel, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 'SS' 1350, as adopted pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/  Richard R. Russell
     -------------------------------
     Richard R. Russell
     Chief Executive Officer
     November 14, 2002


/s/  Matthew R. Friel
     -------------------------------
     Matthew R. Friel
     Chief Financial Officer
     November 14, 2002


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of 'SS' 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.