alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark Scott, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with
the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law.

                                        /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        President and Chief Financial Officer
                                        December 21, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GREGORY GARRETT BROWN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) C.A. No. 04-270 Erie

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on 

September 20, 2004 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan

Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act,

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on August 2, 2005,

recommended that the Defendant’s motion to dismiss [12] be granted and the case

dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and/or failure to state a cognizable legal

claim. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file

objections. Service was attempted on Plaintiff by certified mail at the Erie County

Prison, Plaintiff’s address of record, and on the Defendant. No objections were filed. 

After de novo review of the complaint and documents in the case, together with the

report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2005;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s motion to dismiss the

complaint [12] be granted and that the above-captioned case be DISMISSED for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction and/or failure to state a cognizable legal claim.

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated

August 2, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: all parties of record 

Case 1:04-cv-00270-SJM-SPB Document 17 Filed 08/22/05 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                110
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      110
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      1,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 400
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              500
<OTHER-SE>                                          1,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        1,377
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       164
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   164
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                          164
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .00



</TABLE>
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 08-724 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ENERGY 

Cooperation 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and OTHER GOVERNMENTS 

Signed at Victoria July 23, 2007 

 with 

Annexes 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MULTILATERAL 

Energy: Cooperation 

 Agreement signed at Victoria July 23, 2007; 

 Entered into force July 24, 2008. 

 With annexes.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2188 

To suspend temporarily the duty on hydrazine hydrate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2006 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on hydrazine hydrate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HYDRAZINE HYDRATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.28.25 Hydrazine hydrate (CAS No. 

7803-57-8) (provided for in 

subheading 2825.10) ........... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•S 2188 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE U.S SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sense Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and Rule 13a-14(b), that to his knowledge:  1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    June 25, 2010 /S/ BRUCE E. SCHREINERBruce E. Schreiner, President(principal financial and accounting officer)
#### KRAUSE & MANAGAN LUMBER COMPANY, LTD., Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Lionel VINCENT et al., Defendants and Appellants.

No. 6283.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Feb. 6, 1978.

Rogers & St. Romain by Phillip St. Ro-main, Lake Charles, for defendants and appellants.

Anderson, Leithead, Scott, Boudreau & Savoy by James A. Leithead, Lake Charles, for plaintiff and appellee.

Before CULPEPPER, DOMENGEAUX and WATSON, JJ.

*559CULPEPPER, Judge.

Plaintiff and defendants are owners in indivisión of 144.75 acres of land in Calca-sieu Parish. Plaintiff owns 89%, four defendants own 2% each, and a fifth defendant owns 3%. Plaintiff sued for a partition by licitation, and the defendants (all of whom are majors residing outside of Louisiana) answered, asking for a partition in kind.

After a trial on the merits, the district judge held that the subject property could not be divided into 784 lots of approximately equal value, as would be necessary for a partition in kind.

In a motion for a new trial, defendants alleged they would agree to combine their interests to permit the land to be divided into only nine lots of equal value. They argued they could draw one of the nine, which they would own in indivisión, and the remaining eight parcels would be owned by the plaintiff. The district judge denied the motion for a new trial.

On appeal, defendants do not question the trial judge’s finding that the property cannot be divided into 784 lots of equal value. They now urge only the argument made in their motion for a new trial.

Defendants cite no case which expressly approves a portion of the owners in indivi-sión combining their interest for purposes of drawing lots. They cite cases applying the rule that partition in kind is favored by the law. *Hoss v. Hardeman,*156 La. 371, 100 So. 532 (1924); *Kaffie v. Wilson,*130 La. 350, 57 So. 1001 (1911).

Even assuming, without deciding, that defendants can combine their interests, and assuming that the mere allegations in their motion for a new trial that they “would be willing to draw as a group” is a sufficient agreement to do so, the record supports the decision of the trial judge in denying the new trial on the basis that the propérty cannot be divided into nine lots of approximately equal value without substantial loss and inconvenience. The tract is irregular in shape with various portions inaccessible from public roads. The Kansas City Southern Railroad runs through the tract, as does the Sabine Water Canal. The nature of the land with respect to its present use is varied with parts being agricultural, others cut-over pine land, and another a pecan grove. Defendants have not even suggested to the trial court or to this court any method of dividing the property into nine lots.

For the above reasons, we affirm the judgment appealed. Costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendants-appellants.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1


               Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
Atlantic Coast Airlines Holdings, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statements  (No.  333-41800, 333-66265,  333-15795  and  33-
67492) on Form S-8 of Atlantic Coast Airlines Holdings, Inc.
of our report dated January 30, 2002 except as to Notes 1(f)
and  13, which are as of March 29, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated  balance  sheets  of  Atlantic  Coast  Airlines
Holdings,  Inc.  as of December 31, 2000 and  2001  and  the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity  and  cash flows for each of the years in the  three-
year period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in
the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Atlantic
Coast Airlines Holdings, Inc.

Our report refers to a change, effective January 1, 1999  in
the Company's method of accounting for preoperating costs.





McLean, Virginia
March 29, 2002
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices 

# Order

November 14, 2006

132457 (19)

ARTHUR PORTER, #339222

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 132457 CoA: 271239 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is DENIED because MCL 600. 2963; MSA 27A.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $69.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partia l fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $306.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file furth er appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of th is order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 14, 2006

jm
Exhibit 31.1

                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, Alan Margerison, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IA Global, Inc.
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

     b)  [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5,
         2003)]; and

     c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
         operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 3, 2004                 /s/ Alan Margerison
                                        -------------------
                                        Alan Margerison
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.



|                              |  |                                              
|----------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Subsidiary                    |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|                              | 
|ATIII LLC                     |  | Delaware                                     
|                              | 
|GTC Securities Corporation    |  | Massachusetts                                
|                              | 
|GTC Japan Limited             |  | Japan                                        
|                              | 
|GTC Holding Ltd.              |  | Cayman Islands                               
|                              | 
|TSI Corporation               |  | Delaware                                     
|                              | 
|Taurus hSA LLC                |  | Delaware                                     
|                              | 
|GTC NZ Limited                |  | New Zealand                                  
|                              | 
|GTC Biotherapeutics U.K. Ltd. |  | United Kingdom
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                             0001077552
<NAME>                            GENTEK INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000
       
<S>                               <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<CASH>                                  34,544 
<SECURITIES>                                 0 
<RECEIVABLES>                           88,505 
<ALLOWANCES>                             4,245 
<INVENTORY>                             42,825 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       178,738 
<PP&E>                                 459,751 
<DEPRECIATION>                         227,220 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         598,306 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  166,346 
<BONDS>                                346,013 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0 
<PREFERRED>                                  0 
<COMMON>                                   224 
<OTHER-SE>                             (47,023)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           598,306 
<SALES>                                127,763 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       127,763 
<CGS>                                   92,985 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           92,985 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       4,308 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         14,281 
<INCOME-TAX>                             6,071 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      8,210 
<DISCONTINUED>                           1,195 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0 
<CHANGES>                                    0 
<NET-INCOME>                             9,405 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .45 
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .44 
        




</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Roo Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the quarter  ended
      March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date
      hereof (the “Report”), I, Robin Smyth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  1350
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the SecuritiesExchange
                  Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  1350
      and
      is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      of
      the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
      general incorporation language in such filing.




Dated:     
                  May 15 , 2008
              By:
              /s/
                  Robin SmythRobin
                  SmythChief
                  Financial Officer