alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JANUARY 31, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                          18,288
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,741
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,654
<PP&E>                                         327,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 369,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,754
<BONDS>                                        251,570
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           740
<OTHER-SE>                                       (740)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   369,254
<SALES>                                        111,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,732
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,526
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,825
<INCOME-TAX>                                   101,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,175)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                436,490
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   429,315
<EPS-BASIC>                                       7.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.46


</TABLE>
WHOLE COURT

N O T IC E : M otions for re c ons i de r a tion m us t be phy s ic a lly re ce iv e d in our cle r k’s off i c e w ithin te n da y s of the da te of de c is ion to be de e m ed tim e ly file d.

http://w w w .ga a ppe a l s .us /r ule s Januar y 13, 2020



# I n th e Co u r t o f

A p p eals o f

G eo r g ia

A1 7 A0 90 2

. GOULD v . H O U S ING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF AUGUSTA.
M C F A D D E N , Ch i ef J u d g e. In H o u s i n g Au th

. of t h e Ci t

y o f Au g us t a v. Go u l d , 3 0 5 Ga. 5 45 (8 26 SE2 d 1 0 7 ) (2 0 1 9), t h e Su p rem e Co u rt of G eo rg i a rev ers ed t h e ju d gm en t o f t h i s co u rt i n Go u ld

v. Ho u s i n g Au t h

. of t he Ci t y o f Au g u s t a , 3 4 3 Ga. Ap p . 7 6 1 (8 08 SE2 d 1 0 9 ) (2 0 1 7 ). Acco rd in g ly , we vacat e o u r earl i er o p in i o n, ad op t t h e o p i n i on o f t h e Su p rem e Co u rt

as o u r o wn , an d affi rm t h e su p eri o r c o u rt ’ s d is m i s s al o f Carri e G o u ld ’ s p et i t i o n fo r
cert io rari

. Ju d gmen t a f f i r med

. B a r n es , P. J., Mi l l er , P. J., Do yl e, P. J., McMi l l ia n , P. J., Mer ci er , Rees e, Go b ei l

, a n d Co o mer , JJ., co n cu r .
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-20-00285-CV

__________________

ABEL VILLARREAL, Appellant

V.

KENDAL NICOLE VILLARREAL, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 418th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 19-10-14652-CV

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Appellant, Abel Villarreal, filed a motion for appellate review of the trial 

court’s order of January 26, 2021, which required appellant to pay the cost for the 

record by making an initial $180 payment and thereafter by making $100 monthly 

payments until the cost for the record has been paid. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(f)(7). 

Appellant challenges the trial court’s finding that he makes approximately 

$39,000 annually at his current employment. The evidence before the trial court 

included appellant’s testimony that he earns $2,480 per month and a pay stub for a 
2

two-week period in December 2020 that showed he earned $15.50 per hour with 

additional overtime and holiday pay. According to the pay stub, appellant earned 

approximately $1,524 in gross pay, including holiday pay of $248, from which taxes 

of $273 and child support in the amount of approximately $625 had been withheld. 

Appellant claimed monthly expenses of $2,860, but he provided no 

documentary support for any expenses other than child support. The trial court found 

appellant’s testimony was not credible and was contradicted by his previous

statements of inability to pay costs. A statement signed on November 11, 2020,

stated appellant’s monthly expenses were $1,855. Appellant testified he had $180 at 

the time of the hearing. Given the evidence that appellant’s average monthly income 

was somewhere between $2,480 and $2,680 with additional income from holiday 

pay, as indicated by appellant’s paystub, and his monthly expenses were somewhere 

between $1,855 and $2,860, as indicated in his statements, the trial court’s finding 

that appellant could afford to pay $180 down and $100 per month for the record is 

supported by the record.

On this record, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by 

finding that appellant failed to carry his burden under Rule 145 and that appellant is 

able to afford payment in installments. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(f). We deny 

appellant’s motion to challenge and affirm the trial court’s order to pay costs. See 

Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(g).
3

ORDER ENTERED February 22, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS


I, Gary M. Kapral, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Microfield Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  May 20, 2004
                   -------------------


      /s/ Gary M. Kapral
      --------------------------------
      Gary M. Kapral
      Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26799]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Board of Visitors, United States Military Academy

AGENCY: U.S. Military Academy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
meeting:
    Name of Committee: Board of Visitors, United States Military 
Academy (USMA).
    Date of Meeting: October 31, 1997.
    Place of Meeting: Superintendent's Conference Room, Taylor Hall, 
United States Military Academy, West Point, New York.
    Start Time of Meeting: Approximately 8 a.m.
    Proposed Agenda: Preparation of the Annual Report to the President, 
Annual Reviews of the Athletic and Admissions programs at USMA and a 
program review of the United States Military Academy Preparatory 
School. All proceedings are open.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph A. Dubyel, 
United States Military Academy, West Point, NY 10996-5000, (914) 938-
4200.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26799 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. ORMOND BEACH FIRST NATIONAL BANK, Appellee.

No. L-71.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Sept. 16, 1969.

William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. U.S. Atty. Gen., Edward F. Boardman, U.S. Atty., Robert V. Zener and Daniel Joseph, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Raymond, Wilson, Karl, Conway & Barr, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. See United States of America v. Cless, 254 F.2d 590 (U.S.C.A., 3rd Cir., 1958).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
#### William FISHER, Jr. v. Ralph M. McLANE.

No. 38954.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 52952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-27000]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

44 CFR Part 206


Disaster Assistance; Hazard Mitigation Grant Program

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice of waiver.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice states FEMA's intent to streamline the Hazard 
Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) process by allowing States to use a 
one-time effort to apply statewide eligibility criteria to the HMGP for 
all disasters declared before April 7, 1997.

DATES: October 10, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert F. Shea, Mitigation 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3619, (facsimile) (202) 646-3104.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the past, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program 
(HMGP) funds were only available in counties designated as eligible by 
FEMA for Individual Assistance (IA) or Public Assistance (PA). Under 
the Stafford Act both IA and PA funds address damage or hardship 
resulting from the major disaster, but HMGP funds are intended to 
reduce the risk of future damage or hardship. As a result, FEMA has 
determined that the use of HMGP funds should not be limited only to 
counties designated as eligible for IA or PA funds. In an effort to 
streamline the HMGP, FEMA will automatically designate all counties 
within the declared State as eligible to receive HMGP funds for all 
disasters declared on or after April 7, 1997.
    In addition, FEMA has determined that States declared before this 
time should be permitted to take advantage of this policy. In order to 
ensure consistency in the availability of HMGP funds among all States 
with open disasters, FEMA is temporarily waiving its regulatory 
requirement at 44 CFR 206.40(d) that requires a State to request 
additional areas for designation within 30 days of the incident or 
declaration. Therefore, this notice makes public that States have until 
November 10, 1997, to submit to their FEMA Regional Office the open 
disasters for which they are requesting the designation of additional 
counties. For every disaster for which a State is amending the 
designated areas, States will have until February 9, 1998, or 18 months 
after the date of the disaster declaration, whichever is later, to 
submit HMGP project applications to the Regional Office.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)

    Dated: October 2, 1997.
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-27000 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
| a.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      December 9, 2009 | By: /s/ Paul      B. Toms,      Jr.               |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | Paul B. Toms, Jr.Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By: /s/ E.      Larry      Ryder                    |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | E. Larry RyderExecutive      Vice President - Finance andAdministration      and Chief Financial Officer |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
LOLO M. MOLIGA QOVlAHOR

March 2, 2016
Byron K. Huffman Acting Director OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR AMERICAN S AM OA GOVE RN MENT Telephone: (684) 633-4116 Fax : (684) 633-2269

Federal Aviation Administration Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Dear Director, LEMANU P
. MAUGA LIEUTENANT OOVlANOA Serial: 078

On November 24, 2015, my office received your letter requesting for our territory's eventual compliance with Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use ofAirport Revenue; Proceeds from Taxes on Aviation Fuel (79 Fed. Reg. 6628) and FAA' s Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use ofAirport Revenue (64 Fed. Reg
. 7696, February 16, 1999). I am pleased to inform you that our territory is currently in compliance. Under 49 U.S.C. 41707(b), airport revenues are to 

### be used for 1) the airport, 2) the local airport system , or 3) other local facilities owned or operated by the airport owner or operator and directly and substantially related to the airtransportation ofpassengers or property. The FAA rules clarified and reiterated that proceeds from taxes on aviation fuel are airport revenue that must 

### be used for the above purposes. Under our local law, A.S.C
.A. 11.1002(a)(4)(E), proceeds from taxes on aviation fuel are, ' 'to be placed in the enterprise fund for the operation ofPago Pago International airport"
. Your letter asks for an Action Plan outlining our plan for compliance. This will 

### be unnecessary as our aviation fuel tax laws are in compliance with federal law and FAA policy. Please contact my office ifthere is any other verification that needs to 

### be submitted to the FAA. Sincerely, 

# LA /Y). 

# h1'"4• Lolo M. Moliga Governor ofAmerican Samoa
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7433** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. BOBBY RAY WHITE, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easter n District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:98

- cr - 00158

- BO

- 1 )

Submitted : June 17, 2010 Decided: June 23, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Bobby Ray White, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolph A. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bobby Ray White, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district cou rt. United States v. White , No. 5:98

- cr - 00158

- BO

- 1 (E.D.N.C. July 21, 2009) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional proce ss.
AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000904020
<NAME>                        ATLANTIC COAST AIRLINES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         39,167
<SECURITIES>                                   10,737
<RECEIVABLES>                                  21,890
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (269)
<INVENTORY>                                     2,477
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               76,857
<PP&E>                                         49,364
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,726)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,680
<BONDS>                                         73,855
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       40,471
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,666)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,992
<SALES>                                        202,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,444
<CGS>                                          176,501
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               26,839
<INCOME-TAX>                                   12,339
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            14,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   14,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.61


</TABLE>
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3000 

To repeal Freedom Support Act section 907 waiver authority with respect 

to assistance to Azerbaijan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Mr. PETERS (for himself, Mr. RUBIO, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. VAN

HOLLEN, Mr. RICKETTS, and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To repeal Freedom Support Act section 907 waiver authority 

with respect to assistance to Azerbaijan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Armenian Protection 

5 Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FREEDOM SUPPORT ACT SECTION 907 WAIVER RE7 PEAL. 

8 Title II of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, 

9 and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2002 (Public 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3000 IS

1 Law 107–115) (22 U.S.C. 5812 note) is amended, under 

2 the heading ‘‘ASSISTANCE FOR THE INDEPENDENT

3 STATES OF THE FORMER SOVIET UNION’’, in subsection 

4 (g)— 

5 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘(1)’’; 

6 (2) by striking paragraphs (2) through (6); and 

7 (3) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through 

8 (F) as paragraphs (1) through (6), respectively. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB