alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52328-52329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26471]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-740-000]


Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

October 1, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 9, 1997, Iroquois Gas Transmission 
System, L.P. (Iroquois), One Corporate Drive, Suite 600, Shelton, 
Connecticut 06484, filed in Docket No. CP7-740-000 a request pursuant 
to Sections 157.205 and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 
157.205, 157,212) under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to 
add a new delivery point and to construct and operate appurtenant 
facilities on behalf of New York State Electric & Gas Company (NYSEG), 
an existing shipper, in Lewis County, New York, for Part 284 
transportation services by Iroquois, under Iroquois' blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. GP89-634-000, et al., all as more 
fully set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and 
open to public inspection.
    Iroquois proposes to add the new delivery point for service to 
NYSEG, as local distribution company, and states that NYSEG will 
construct and operate the associated metering and regulating facilities 
under New York State jurisdiction. It is stated that the Iroquois is 
not presently delivering any volumes at the proposed new delivery 
point. Iroquois and NYSEG estimate that

[[Page 52329]]

Iroquois would deliver up to 5,000 Mcf per day of NYSEG's current 
contract quantity at the proposed delivery point. It is asserted that 
the deliveries would have no effect on Iroquois' peak day and annual 
deliveries.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26471 Filed 10-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 50244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25278]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Marketing Service

7 CFR Part 1205


1997 Amendment to Cotton Board Rules and Regulations Adjusting 
Supplemental Assessment on Imports

AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.

ACTION: Correction to final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the final rule published September 2, 
1997 (62 FR 46412) which amended the Cotton Board Rules and Regulations 
by lowering the value assigned to imported cotton for the purpose of 
calculating supplemental assessments collected for use by the Cotton 
Research and Promotion Program.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 2, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig Shackelford, (202) 720-2259.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) amended the Cotton Board 
Rules and Regulations by lowering the value assigned to imported cotton 
for the purpose of calculating supplemental assessments collected for 
use by the Cotton Research and Promotion Program. This action is 
required by this regulation on an annual basis to ensure that the 
assessments collected on imported cotton and the cotton content of 
imported products remain similar to those paid on domestically produced 
cotton. As a result of changes in the 1997 Harmonized Tariff Schedule 
(HTS), numbering changes in the import assessment table are amended. 
Eleven HTS numbers were to be eliminated from the assessment table 
because negligible assessments have been collected on these numbers and 
their elimination would contribute to reducing the overall burden to 
importers.

Need for Correction

    In rule FR Doc. 97-23218 published on September 2, 1997 (62 FR 
46412), make the following correction. On page 46415, in the third 
column, immediately following the HTS number 5212216090 remove the 
entries for HTS numbers 5309214010, 5309214090, 5309294010, 5311004020, 
5407810010, 5407810030, 5407912020, 5408312020, 5408329020, 5408349020, 
and 5408349095.

    Dated: September 18, 1997.
Norma McDill,
Acting Director, Cotton Division.
[FR Doc. 97-25278 Filed 9-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
#### Roy ROLAND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-678.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 7, 1971.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Humes T. Lasher, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50567-50568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25536]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-749-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

September 22, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 11, 1997, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas), Post Office Box 20008, Owensboro, Kentucky 
42304, filed in Docket No. CP97-749-000 a request pursuant to 
Secs. 157.205, 157.212, and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations 
under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205, 157.212, and 157.216) for 
authorization to replace, relocate, and consolidate three existing 
delivery points in Hart County, Kentucky. Texas Gas avers that such 
proposal would upgrade the existing measurement facilities, and 
relocate the meters to a site which is more convenient for the 
operation and maintenance of the station. Texas Gas makes such request 
under its blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-407-000 
pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set 
forth in the request on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Specifically, Texas Gas proposes to replace, relocate and 
consolidate its existing Rowletts, Woodsonville and Munfordville 
delivery points which are used to serve Western Kentucky Gas Company 
(WKG), a local distribution company. Texas Gas then proposes to replace 
those three delivery points with a new consolidated delivery point that 
will be know as the River Oaks delivery meter station. Texas Gas states 
that since this proposal is merely a relocation and consolidation of 
existing meter stations into one new station, service to the customers 
of WKG will not be affected by this abandonment. It is further stated 
that since no increase in contract quantity has been requested by WKG, 
this proposal will not have a significant effect on Texas Gas' peak day 
and annual deliveries.

[[Page 50568]]

    Texas Gas estimates the cost of these replacements and relocations 
to be approximately $81,000.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instate notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Sec. 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the 
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25536 Filed 9-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 4:06-cv-02000-JEJ Document 4 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:06-cv-02000-JEJ Document 4 Filed 10/17/06 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:06-cv-02000-JEJ Document 4 Filed 10/17/06 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24455]



[[Page 48638]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-339-003]


KO Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

September 10, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 8, 1997, KO Transmission Company (KO 
Transmission) tendered for filing Second Revised Sheet No. 147 to 
comply with the GISB Standards in Order No. 587. KO Transmission 
proposes an effective date of September 8, 1997 for the revised tariff 
sheet.
    KO Transmission states that the revised tariff sheet reflects 
changes to comply with an August 27, 1997 Letter Order in this docket.
    KO Transmission states that copies of this filing were served to 
all of its customers.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. All 
protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make any protestant a party to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24455 Filed 9-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2392-2393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00581]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New Mexico Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that an orientation and 
planning meeting of the New Mexico Advisory Committee to the Commission 
will convene at 1:00 p.m. (MDT) on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, in the 
Wells Fargo Board Room, Albuquerque Hispano Chamber of commerce, 1309 
Fourth Street NW., Albuquerque, NM 87102. The purpose of the 
orientation meeting is to inform the newly appointed Committee members 
about the rules of operation of federal advisory committees and to 
select additional officers, as determined by the Committee. The purpose 
of the planning meeting is to discuss potential topics that the 
Committee may wish to study.

[[Page 2393]]

    Persons who desire additional information may contact the Rocky 
Mountain Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1961 Stout 
Street, Suite 13-201, Denver, CO 80294, phone 303-866-1040 and fax 303-
866-1050, or email to Evelyn Bohor at ebohor@usccr.gov.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Rocky 
Mountain Regional Office at least 10 working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, as they become available, both 
before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the word of this 
advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at the 
above phone number, email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provision of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated January 12, 2015.
David Mussatt,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2015-00581 Filed 1-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of The Cyber Group Network Corporation
        (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        the undersigned, Chief Financial Officer, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to The Cyber Group Network Corporation
        and
        will be retained by The Cyber Group Network Corporation and furnished to
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 Dated: 
                December 1, 2005
              By:
              /s/ Erna
                GaoErna
                  Gao
                Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-82982, 33-97024, 333-25769, 333-49497, 333-51657, 333-59245, 333-94187, 333-50874, 333-108109, 333-111464, 333-127708, 333-129166, 333-135054, 333-142564, 333-142566) and Form S-8 (File Nos.
333-29059, 333-29975, 333-34119, 333-56749, 333-56747, 333-80623, 333-38490, 333-38494, 333-91468, 333-91470, 333-106066, 333-117923, 333-38484) of GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2009 relating to the financial
statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading Selected Financial Data in this Form 10-K.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|Boston, Massachusetts         
|February 27, 2009
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Patrick D Matthews, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of Primary Business Systems, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August 14, 2003 | /s/ Patrick D Matthews  |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|
|                  | Patrick D Matthews      |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52703-52704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26759]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-542-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

October 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 30, 1997 Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff 
sheets to become effective October 1, 1997:

Twenty-first Revised Sheet No. 25
Twenty-first Revised Sheet No. 26
Twenty-first Revised Sheet No. 27
Twenty-second Revised Sheet No. 28
Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 29
Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 30


[[Page 52704]]


    Columbia states that this filing is being submitted pursuant to 
Article III, Section C, Collections under Section 46 of the General 
Terms and Conditions of Columbia's Tariff SFC Provision of the 
Stipulation and Agreement in Docket No. RP95-408, et al., approved by 
the Commission on April 17, 1997 (79 FERC para. 61,044 (1997)). In 
accordance with this provision, Columbia was permitted to collect $22.4 
million via the SFC rate. As of September 30, 1997, Columbia has 
collected $22.9 million of SFC revenues. By this filing, Columbia 
states that it is proposing to terminate the SFC rate effective October 
1, 1997. In addition, Columbia will refund to customers via a billing 
credit approximately $0.5 million of collections in the month of 
September 1997 over the $22.4 million cap. The total excess collections 
will be allocated to customers based on total collections during the 
month of September 1997.
    Columbia requests a waiver of Section 154.207 of the Commission's 
regulations in order to permit Columbia to remove the SFC Rate 
effective October 1, 1997. Granting this waiver allows Columbia's 
customers to avoid any additional over-recoveries of SFC revenues.
    Columbia states further that copies of this filing have been mailed 
to all of its customers, affected state regulatory commissions, and all 
parties on the official service in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26759 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7445

CHARLES WARNER JONES, a/k/a Charles Jones,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

COMMISSIONERS; SERGEANT MCDONALD; CO II

SELLMAN; CO II SOFELLO; CO IV PAINTER; JAMES

PEGUESE, Each Defendant is hereby sued

individually and severally,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

SECURITY OFFICER STITCH,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA03-412-RDB)

Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 8, 2003

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Charles Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney

General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Charles Jones appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Maryland

Dep’t of Corr. Comm’rs, No. CA-03-412-RDB (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2003).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 23.6

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 33-62787) of AirTouch Communications, Inc. and in the related
Prospectus and in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 33-57081 and
33-64553, No. 33-57077, and No. 33-57083) pertaining to the AirTouch
Communications, Inc. 1993 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, the AirTouch
Communications, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the AirTouch
Communications, Inc. Retirement Plan, of our report dated February 16, 1996, 
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of New Par,
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of AirTouch Communications Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 1995.



                                                Ernst & Young LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 26, 1996