Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 50313 Su m m ar y Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. TERRE N CE D OYLE M I TCH ELL D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he W es t er n D i st r i c tof Texas U S D C N o . 1 :04 -C R -2 0 3 -1 B ef ore JO N E S , C h i ef

Ju dg e, an d D AV IS an d W IE N E R , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * T errence D oyl e M i t chel l , federalpri soner # 041 06-180, app eal s thedi s t ri ct c o u r t ’ s o r d e rd e n y i n gh i s mo t i o n t o mo d i f yh i s s e nt e nc e p u r s u a n tt o 1 8 U. S . C. § 3 582(c ) . M i t c hel lpl eade d gui l t y t o po ss es si on w i t h i nt entt o di st r ibut e 5 00 gr am s orm or e o f

c oc ai ne and pos se ss i on o f c ount er feitc urr enc y. M i t c he l la r gue s t hathe i s e nt i t l e d t o ha ve hi s s e nt e nc e r e duc e d p ur s uant t o Am en d m en t 70 9, w hi c h addre ss ed t w o a r eas of t he G ui del i nes ’c r i m i nal hi s t o r y r ul e s . M i t che l lc o nc e de s t hatt he a m e ndm e ntw e nti nt o e f fe c ta f t e rhe United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D September

2, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 50313

2 w as sen te n ce d an d that i ti s not l i st ed byt h e Sen t en ci n g C om m i ssi on ’ s pol i cy st atem en ti n U . S . S . G . § 1B 1. 10 a s a guidel i n e am en dm en tt h at appli es r e t r o ac t ive l y. H e ar gue s , ho w e ve r , t hatt he di s t r i c tc o ur tw as no tl i m i t e d b y t he G u i del i n es’l i stof

ret roact ivel y ap pl i cabl e am e n dm en t s because, af t er Un i t ed St at e s v . Book er , 5 4 3 U .S . 2 2 0 (2 0 0 5 ), th e G u id e lin e s a r e a d v is o r y . M itc h e ll n otes th a t A m en d m en t 71 7 to t h e G u i d eli n es re cog n i ze s th a t B ooker rend ered t he G ui del i nes advi so r y. W e r e v iew t h e di st ri ctcourt ’ s den i alof M i t chel l ’ s § 358 2(c) m ot i on f or a b u s e o f d is c r e tio n . S ee Uni t e d St at e s v . Shaw , 3 0 F .3d 2 6 , 2 8 -2 9 (5 th C ir. 1 9 9 4 ). A m en dm en t709 , on w h i ch M i t chel lrel i es f or h i s § 35 82(c) m ot i on , i s not l i st ed a s a n a m e n d m e n t c o v e r e db yth e p o lic ys ta te m e n t in § 1 B 1 .1 0 . S ee§ 1 B 1 .10 (c). T h eref ore, t h e pl ai n l an gu age of § 3582 (c) di ct ated t h at t h e di st ri ct court w as not a u th o r iz e dto re d u c e a s e n te n c e b a s e do n A m e n d m e n t 7 0 9 b e c a u s e t h a t w o u ld b e in con sist en t w ithS e n te n c in gC o m m is s io n p o lic y . S ee § 1 B .10 , co m m e n t. (n .1); § 3 5 8 2 (c)(2 ). M ore ov er, th i s cou rt ha s h eld th a t “ Boo ke rd oes no ta l t e rt he m a n d a to r ych a r a c t e ro f § 1 B 1 .1 0 ’ s lim ita tio n s o n s e n te n c e re d u c tio n s .” S eeUn itedS ta tes v. D o u b lin , ___ F. 3d _

__ , 2009 W L 1743661 ( 5t h C i r . June 22, 20 09 ) . The di s t r i c tc o ur t ’ s j udg m e nti s a f f i r m e d. M i t c hel lal soas ks t hi s c our tt o r ec al lt he m andat e i n appealno. 05- 50203 a n dto re m a n dth e ca s e to th e d is tr ic t c o u r t fo ra n e v id e n tia r yh e a r in go n h is c la im th a t c o u n s e l’ s a lle g e din e ffe c tiv e a s s is ta n c e ca u s e dth e d is m i s s a l o f h is di r e c ta ppealfo rw anto f pr o s e c ut i o n. M i t c he l l ’ s r e que s tf o rar e c allo f

t he m a n d a te is b e y o n dt h e s c o p e o f r e lie f p r o v id e dfo ru n d e r§ 3 5 8 2 , a n d , i n fa ct, M i t c he l le xp r e s s l y s t at e s t hathe i s nots e e ki ng a r e c allo f t he m and at e pur s uant to § 3 5 8 2 . W h ile th is co u r t m a yre c a ll am a n d a te t o p r e v e n tinju s tic e , see5 TH C IR . R . 41. 2 , M itch e l l ’ s r equ estf or s u ch rel i ef

ha s not been properl y presented in th e fo r m o f am o tio n to th is co u r t. S ee5 t h C i r. R . 27. A ccor di n gl y, w e do n ot en t ert ai n i n t h i s app ealM i t chel l ’ s r equ estf or a r ecal lof

t h e m an da t e. AF F I RMED.