alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Florida, ex rel. Tullio COSTARELLI, Relator, v. CRIMINAL COURT OF RECORD IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY, Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-1055.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 16, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Mandamus denied.
#### ROCKLEDGE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Appellee.

No. 69-178.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Dec. 19, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32

GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended
December 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                                             
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.                                   
|                    | 
|Date: March 6, 2008 |  | /s/ Geoffrey F. Cox                                         
|                    |  | Geoffrey F. Cox                                             
|                    |  | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                    | 
|Date: March 6, 2008 |  | /s/ John B. Green                                           
|                    |  | John B. Green                                               
|                    |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--IOPS.ORG Project

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 2, 1997, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Corporation For National 
Research Initiatives (``CNRI'') has filed written notifications on 
behalf of a Joint Venture between CNRI and participants known as the 
IOPS.ORG (``IOPS'') Project simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the 
parties and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 
Act, the identities of the parties are CNRI, Reston, VA; ANS CO+RE 
Systems, Inc., Elmsford, NY; AT&T Corporation, Basking Ridge, NJ; BBN 
Corporation, Cambridge, MA; EarthLink Network, Inc., Pasadena, CA; GTE 
Intelligent Network Services Incorporated, Irving, TX; MCI 
Telecommunications, Washington, DC; NETCOM On-Line Communications 
Services, Inc., San Jose, CA; PSINet, Inc., Herndon, VA; Sprint 
Communications Company, L.P., Kansas City, MO; and UUNET Technologies, 
Inc., Fairfax, VA.
    The nature of the Project will be to promote, in the public 
interest, industry cooperation on the joint engineering efforts to help 
ensure an operational global Internet, by addressing issues that 
require coordination and information-sharing across and among Internet 
service providers, and to support engineering analysis, system 
simulation and testing, and interaction with other groups and 
organizations as appropriate for the accomplishment of its goal of 
improving the reliability and robustness of the Internet.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-26424 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**INSWEB CORPORATION**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I,Hussein A. Enan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of InsWeb Corporation,certify that:

 

(1)           I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of InsWeb Corporation;

 

(2)           Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

(3)           Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

(4)           The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e), for the registrant and we have:

 

a.    Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b.   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c.    Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

(5)           The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

 

a.    All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b.   Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| ** **          | **/s/  HUSSEIN A. ENAN**              |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Dated:  May12, 2008 | **Hussein A. Enan**                   |
|                | Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Motion Granted and Abatement Order filed July 12, 2012

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 12
- 00511
- CV

____________ IN THE ESTATE OF NED THEODORE GORDON, DEC EASED

On Appeal from the County Court at Law #4

Fort Bend County, Texa s Trial Court Cause No. 09
- CPR
- 022104


### A B A T E M E N T O R D E R On May 21, 2012, appellant, Marshall Gordon , filed a notice of appeal from a portion of a judgment signed August 8, 2011, which was purported ly made final and appealable by a final summa ry judgment signed April 20, 2012. The record has not yet been filed. On June 19, 2012, appellant filed an opposed motion to abate this appeal pending resolution of his motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction a related appeal docketed under our case num

ber 14

- 11

- 00812

- CV , and styled Patricia Vickery v. Marshall Gordon & Clardy, Davis & Knowles, . On July 3, 2012, appellee in this case , Patricia Vickery, filed a response in opposition to the motion. Appellee asserts that jurisdiction has not been properly invoked over this appeal , and she will file a motion to dismiss the appeal2

after the record has been filed . Appellant contends , however, that the ruling on the pending motion to dismiss in the related appeal may determine whether this appeal will continue. Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion and issue the following order: This appeal is ordered ABATED until appellant’s motion to dismiss filed in case number 14

- 11

- 00812

- CV has been decided, or until further order of this court. The appeal is abated, tre ated as a closed case, and removed from this court = s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court = s active docket when the jurisdictional motion filed in case number 14

- 11

- 00812

- CV has been decided. The court will also consider an appropria te motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion.

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001077670
<NAME> TRANSDIGM INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             894
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,756
<ALLOWANCES>                                       485
<INVENTORY>                                     33,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,068
<PP&E>                                          48,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,534
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,532
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,996
<BONDS>                                        254,765
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,169
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       102,238
<OTHER-SE>                                   (225,266)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,532
<SALES>                                         70,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,168
<CGS>                                           37,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,110
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,156
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,817
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,817
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# ugl

# ugm3
##### 



EXHIBIT 11
AGEMARK CORPORATION

STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

|                                                              |  |                            |           |      |  |  |           | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | --------- | ---- |  |  | --------- | 
|                                                              |  | Six Months Ended March 31,
|                                                              |  |                           
|                                                              |  | 2003                       |           | 2002
|                                                              |  |                            |           |     
|Common shares issued                                          |  |                            | 1,109,481 |      |  |  | 1,000,000 | 
|                                                              |  |                            |           |      |  |  |           | 
|Shares cancelled, assumed abandoned                           |  |                            |           |      |  |  | 54,393-   | 
|                                                              |  |                            |           |      |  |  |           | 
|Weighted average common shares assumed outstanding for period |  |                            | 1,109,481 |      |  |  | 945,607   | 



---

|(1) |  | Shares attributable to vested stock options are anti-dilutive.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------

18
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Nicklebys.com,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  March  31,  2004,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report'),  I, Scott
Thornock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ Scott Thornock
---------------------------------
Scott Thornock
Chief Executive Officer
May 19, 2004
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25557]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4351-000]

Illinois Power Company; Notice of Filing

September 22, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 15, 1997, Illinois Power Company 
tendered for filing firm transmission agreements under which Illinois 
State University will take transmission service pursuant to its open 
access transmission tariff. The agreements are base on the Form of 
Service Agreement in Illinois Power's tariff.
    Illinois Power has requested an effective date of August 1, 1997.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filings should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before October 2, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25557 Filed 9-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

VINCENT A. GANT, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 04-219 Erie

)

JAMES SHERMAN, Warden, et al., ) 

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on August 2,

2004, and was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules

72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, filed on August 2, 2005, [Doc. No.

24] recommended that Petitioner’s Petition [Doc. No. 2] be denied. The parties were allowed ten

(10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified

mail and on Respondent. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the case, together

with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2005,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

[Doc. No. 2] is DENIED. 

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated August 2, 2005, is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

The clerk is directed to mark the case closed.

s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: All parties of record. 

Case 1:04-cv-00219-SJM-SPB Document 25 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26370]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION


Membership of the USCCR Performance Review Board

Agency: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of Membership of the USCCR Performance Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary: This notice announces the appointment of the Performance 
Review Board (PRB) of the United States Commission on Civil Rights. 
Publication of PRB membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).
    The PRB provides fair and impartial review of the U.S. Commission 
on Civil Rights' Senior Executive Service performance appraisals and 
makes recommendations regarding performance ratings and performance 
awards to the Staff Director, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights for the 
FY 1997 rating year.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. M. Catherine Gates, Director of 
Human Resources, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 9th Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20425, (202) 376-8364.

Members

Gloria Gutierrez, Actg. Deputy Associate Commissioner for 
Administration and Quality Services, Patent and Trademark Office, 
Department of Commerce.
Mary Jennings, General Counsel, Merit System Protection Board.
Robert Kugelman, Director of Administration, Department of Commerce.
Stephanie Moore,
Acting Solicitor.
[FR Doc. 97-26370 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-205-000]


Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

January 29, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 24, 1997, Southern Natural Gas Company 
(Southern), Post Office Box 2563, Birmingham, Alabama 35202-2563, filed 
in Docket No. CP97-205-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 
157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 
CFR 157.205, 157.216) for authorization to abandon certain measurement 
facilities at certain farm tap locations in Louisiana, Mississippi, and 
Alabama, under Southern's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. 
CP82-406-000, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, all as 
more fully set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission 
and open to public inspection.
    Southern proposes to abandon: (1) the J.C. Kemp Farm Tap, located 
in West Carroll Parish, Louisiana, (2) United Cement No. 1 and No. 2 
Farm Taps, both located in Lowndes County, Mississippi, (3) the Fannie 
Strickland Farm Tap, located in Elmore County, Alabama, and (4) the 
L.A.Walter Farm Tap, located in West Carroll Parish, Louisiana.
    Southern states it seeks to abandon these farm tap facilities 
because it no longer provides service to the customers located at any 
of the five farm taps.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2649 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT MCNAIRY, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-323 Erie

v. )

)

JAMES SHERMAN, WARDEN, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on October 31,

2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 10], filed on

October 27, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be dismissed as moot. The

parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service

was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondent. No objections were filed. 

After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the

Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DISMISSED as moot. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 10] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on October 27, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00323-SJM-SPB Document 11 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of RPM Advantage.
(the "Registrant") for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David R. Pressler, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:   July 15, 2011


By:

/s/ DAVID R. PRESSLER


David R. Pressler
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
#### Herman MITCHELL, d/b/a Stratford Court Apartments, and Warren Ringe, Appellant, v. Walter A. JOHNSON, Appellee.

No. 69-809.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 3, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.