alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26438]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5905-5]


Governmental Advisory Committee to the U.S. Representative to the 
North American Commission on Environmental Cooperation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) gives notice of a 
meeting of the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) to the U.S. 
Government Representative to the North American Commission on 
Environmental Cooperation (CEC).
    The Committee is established within the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) to advise the Administrator of the EPA in her 
capacity as the U.S. Representative to the CEC. The Committee is 
authorized under Article 18 of the North American Agreement on 
Environmental Cooperation, North America Free Trade Implementation Act, 
Public Law 103-182 and is directed by Executive Order 12915, entitled 
``Federal Implementation of the North American Agreement on 
Environmental Cooperation''. The Committee is responsible for providing 
advice to the U.S. Representative on implementation and further 
elaboration of the agreement.
    The Committee consists of a group of 10 representatives drawn from 
state, local and tribal governments.

DATES: The Committee will meet on October 30,1997 from 8:30 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m. and October 31,1997 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Ramada Plaza Hotel Old Town, 901 N. Fairfax Street, 
Alexandria, Virginia. The meeting is open to the public, with limited 
seating on a first-come, first-served basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Hardaker, Designated 
Federal Officer, U.S. EPA, Office of Cooperative Environmental 
Management, telephone 202-260-2477.

    Dated: September 25, 1997.
Robert Hardaker,
Designated Federal Officer, Governmental Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 97-26438 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                                110
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      110
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      1,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 400
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                              500
<OTHER-SE>                                          1,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        1,377
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       164
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   164
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                          164
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .00



</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John P. MIRANDA a/k/a John Regan.

No. 61259.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1978.

Clifford E. Cardone, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Brian G. Meissner, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
No. 00-7029.

#### Bailey *v.*Artuz, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 53042]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26970]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 2611]


Shipping Coordinating Committee; Subcommittee on Ocean Dumping; 
Notice of Meeting

    The Subcommittee on Ocean Dumping of the Shipping Coordinating 
Committee will hold an open meeting on October 21, 1997 from 1:30 pm to 
3:30 pm to obtain public comment on the issues to be addressed at the 
October 27-31, 1997 Nineteenth Consultative Meeting of the Contracting 
Parties to the London Convention, which is the global international 
treaty regulating ocean dumping. The meeting will also review the 
results of the Twentieth Scientific Group Meeting of the London 
Convention held in May 1997.
    The meeting will be held at Environmental Protection Agency offices 
located at the Fairchild Building, 499 South Capitol Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20003, Room 709. Interested members of the public are 
invited to attend, up to the capacity of the room.

    For further information, please contact Mr. John Lishman, Chief, 
Marine Pollution Control Branch, telephone (202) 260-1952.

    Dated: September 25, 1997.
Russell A. LaMantia,
Chairman, Shipping Coordinating Committee.
[FR Doc. 97-26970 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00197

- CR

Janelle Vanei Loggins

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 1

o f Tarrant County ( 1266511W )

March 7, 2013

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

T his court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM2 

## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00197

- CR NO. 02

- 12

- 00198

- CR

JANELLE VANEI LOGGIN S APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT CO URT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------


### MEMORANDUM OPI NION 1

----------
Appellant Janelle Vanei Loggins appeals her conviction s for attempted

evading arrest or detention and for endangering a child

– criminal negligence

after the trial court revoked her deferred adjudication community supervision,

adjudicated her guilty, and sentenced her to six months’ confinement in each

case, to be served concurrently

. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § § 22.041 (c)

, 38.04

(West 2011 & Supp. 2012 ).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.3

Loggins ’s court

- appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw

as cou nsel and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel’s brief and motion meet

the requirements of Anders v. Californi a , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967)

, by

presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are

no arguable ground s for relief. This court afforded Loggins the opportunity to file

a pro se brief on her own behalf, but s he did not do so. The State did not file a

brief.

As the reviewing court, we must conduct an independent evaluation of the

record to determine whethe r counsel is correct in determining that the appeal s

are frivolous. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App.

1991); Mays v. State , 904 S.W.2d 920, 923 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1995, no

pet.). Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to wit hdraw. See Penson v.

Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 82

– 83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree with

counsel that th ese appeal s are wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing

in the record that arg uably might support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State , 178

S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment s

.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, GARDNER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PU BLISH Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b )4

DELIVERED: March 7, 2013
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Kenneth D. Paskar and Friends 

of LaGuardia Airport Inc. 

Complainant 

v. 

The Port Authority of New York and 

New Jersey, an Interstate Compact 

Agency Pursuant to Article I, Section 6 

of the US Constitution 

Respondent 

FAA Docket No. 16-11-04 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR, Part 16, subpart B, 

the date by which the Final Agency Decision will be issued in this matter is hereby extended 

to on or about June 19,2015. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case . 

. V Eduardo A. Angeles \5',--Associate Administrator 1 for Airports 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on 1Art( . , I caused to be placed in the United 

States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the Notice of Extension of Time, 

addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant 

Steven M. Taber 

Taber Law Group 

P.O. Box 60036 

Irvine, CA 92602-0036 

Counsel for Respondent 

Carlene V. Mcintyre, Assistant General Counsel 

Arnold D. Kolikoff, Attorney 

Law Department 

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey 

150 Greenwich Street, 251

h Floor 

New York, NY 10006 

Hand Delivered to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-1 00 

FAA Eastern Region, AEA-600 

/ z;·· ;;· , r/ ,. Yj .· I

' /; j ' . 

fllt~! ( ·' 

L~Avt A ... · ·.. \ /l;r\J 

/- audia Roberts 

Airport Compliance and Management 

Analysis
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHAEL HILL, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 03-323 Erie

v. )

)

JOHN LAMANNA, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on October 7, 2003,

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

 The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 89], filed on July

31, 2006, recommended that Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative,

motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 82] be granted in part and denied in part. The

parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service

was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. Objections were filed by

Defendants on August 9, 2006 [Doc. 91]. After de novo review of the motion and

documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the

objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the

alternative, motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 82] is GRANTED in part and

DENIED in part. Specifically, Defendants’ motion with respect to Plaintiff’s FTCA claim

regarding silica dust exposure is GRANTED and such claim is dismissed for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction based upon Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative

remedies; Defendants’ motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s FTCA claim

regarding negligent dental care; Defendants’ motion is DENIED with respect to

Plaintiff’s Bivins claim regarding silica dust exposure; and Defendants’ motion is

Case 1:03-cv-00323-SPB Document 92 Filed 08/18/06 Page 1 of 2
2

DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s Bivins claim regarding dental care as to alleged

deliberate indifference stemming from the lengthy delay in medical treatment, and is

GRANTED as to the actual tooth extraction as Defendants were not deliberately

indifferent to Plaintiff’s medical needs. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 89] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on July 31, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:03-cv-00323-SPB Document 92 Filed 08/18/06 Page 2 of 2
Case 05-27929-MBM Doc 25 Filed 12/23/05 Entered 12/23/05 12:34:25 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case 05-27929-MBM Doc 25 Filed 12/23/05 Entered 12/23/05 12:34:25 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Case 05-27929-MBM Doc 25 Filed 12/23/05 Entered 12/23/05 12:34:25 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------

                  Report and Consent of Independent Auditors

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of TranSwitch Corporation:

The audits referred to in our report dated January 21, 1999, except for Note 12,
which is as of February 12, 1999, included the related financial statement 
schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998,
included in the TranSwitch Corporation 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K. This 
financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. 
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule
based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein.

We consent to the use of our reports included herein and incorporated by 
reference in the Registration Statements of TranSwitch Corporation on Form S-8 
(No. 33-94234) and Form S-3 (No. 333-40897), relating to the consolidated 
balance sheets of TranSwitch Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,
1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related financial statement schedule
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which
reports appear in the TranSwitch Corporation 1998 Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                                    KPMG LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 26, 1999
Exhibit 32



EVANS SYSTEMS, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Evans System, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-k for the year ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Blair R. Couey, President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Blair R. Couey                    
|--------------------------------------
|Blair R. Couey                        
|President, Chief Executive Officer and
|Acting Chief Financial Officer        

January 12, 2004
fly 10 the tim point of intended landing and. assuming normal cruising :!peed. (1) during the 

day, 10 fly alter that tor at leQst 30 minutes [emphasis added). 

'l ,_ '1f J:S the CVI.J h ' 

S9Ciion 91 .203(a) prohibits, in pertinent part, any parson from operating a civil aircraft unless 

it has within It ( 1) on appropriate and current airwol1hiness certificate; and (2) an effective 

U.S. registration oanificate issued to s owner or, tor operatiOn within the United States, the 

second copy ot the Aircraft registratiOn Application as provided tor In § 47.31 (c). 

"'" 1 "~ mp n · n<;ucstcd for th ~ .:1 ~ '"tf n • ( ' 1t w·(_ th Phantom :! dOC' 

1( t ", rlf ' <, 

Section 9t.203(b) prescribes. in pertinent part_ that no person may operate a civil aircraff 

unless the airwonhinoss certifica!e or a special flight authortZatiOn issued under§ 91 .71 5 is 

displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that " is legible 10 passengers or crew. 

5 

Section 91.405(a) requires. in pertinent part_ that an aircraff operator or owner shall have that 

aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of the same part and shall, between required 

inspectiOns, except as provided in paragraph (c) of the same sactiOn, have discrepancies 

repaired as prescribed in pan 43 ot the chapter.4 

I 

Tt!cr • r no ~wi-'ruvecl mamtel)aor:P iJit'!lf·Jm tm tl11 I'I!.Ultc>m lflflll'v'f'' .w!l rm:;um tho111t 

.,, · t1110111111 compif'!O ow"!; haul by an JDpwvc. d OJI m Jtnt n.!nrf' '- •r!;nnfJP.,' ~mrw.Jfly 

section 9t .407(a)( t) prohibits, in ~rtin nt part. any per$Ofl from operating an aircraft that has 

undergone maintenance, preverrtive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless~ has been 

approved for relum 10 service by a pe<SOO authorized under § 43.7 ot the same chapter . • 

Soction 91 .409(a)(2) prescribes, in pertinent part_ that no peraon may operate an aircraft 

unless, within the precedii')Q 12: calendar months, it has had an inspection for the issuance o1
EXHIBIT 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

   The undersigned, Bryan Shaul, the Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), of SunHealthcare Group, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, hereby certifies that: 

(i)   theAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 of the Company(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(ii)   theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
| Date: March 9, 2006 | /s/ Bryan Shaul                                         |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     | Bryan Shaul                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*



In connection with the Annual Report of TranSwitch Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Peter J. Tallian, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



By:

/S/     PETER J.
TALLIANPeter J. Tallian Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer




March 11, 2005

---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TranSwitch Corporation and will be retained by TranSwitch Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3068 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3068

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To require each enterprise to include on the Uniform Residential Loan 
   Application a disclaimer to increase awareness of the direct and 
 guaranteed home loan programs of the Department of Veterans Affairs, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA Home Loan Awareness Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. MILITARY SERVICE QUESTION.

    (a) In General.--Subpart A of part 2 of the Federal Housing 
Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4541 
et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 1329. UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL LOAN APPLICATION.

    ``Not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this 
section, the Director shall, by regulation or order, require each 
enterprise to include a disclaimer below the military service question 
on the form known as the Uniform Residential Loan Application stating, 
`If yes, you may qualify for a VA Home Loan. Consult your lender 
regarding eligibility.'.''.
    (b) GAO Study.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 
shall conduct a study and submit to Congress a report on whether not 
less than 80 percent of lenders using the Uniform Residential Loan 
Application have included on that form the disclaimer required under 
section 1329 of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and 
Soundness Act of 1992, as added by subsection (a).

            Passed the Senate July 11 (legislative day, July 10), 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3068

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To require each enterprise to include on the Uniform Residential Loan 
   Application a disclaimer to increase awareness of the direct and 
 guaranteed home loan programs of the Department of Veterans Affairs, 
                        and for other purposes.
```