alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Richmond H. NEALE, Appellant, v. Elizabeth B. NEALE, Appellee.

No. 77-1456.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 20, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 28, 1978.

Alfred Gustinger, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Joseph S. Marcus, Homestead, Harold Mendelow, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and KE-HOE, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

The appellant was the respondent husband in a dissolution of marriage proceeding. During the course of the litigation, the parties, by a letter agreement, sought to make a property settlement. The appellant moved the court to enforce the agreement and the court granted the motion with provisions not relevant to this appeal. The letter agreement provided, in part, as follows:

> “My client offered $20,000 to be paid to your client, in full and complete settlement of all obligations he has or may have in this situation, including but not limited to alimony, support, rehabilitation and/or property settlement and in addition child support. That in return your client shall transfer to Mr. Neale clear title to all real and personal property owned by the parties.”

*441The court subsequently entered its judgment which contained the following provision concerning certain property:

> “3. That in accordance with the agreement of September 13,1976 and the testimony and evidence received during the final hearing, the Court determined that the property legally described as:

> Lot 17 in Block 15 of ESSEX VILLAGE THIRD ADDITION, according to the Plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 47, at Page 94 of the Public Records of Dade County, Florida,

> and the mortgage resulting from the sale of the property legally described as:

> The North 66 feet of the South 330 feet of the West *xk*of the West *lh*of the Northwest Vi of the Southeast Vi of Section 28, Township 56 South, Range 29 East, lying and being in Dade County, Florida.

> and the diamond ring owned by the parties shall be the property of the Petitioner, ELIZABETH B. NEALE, free and clear of the claim of the Respondent, RICHMOND H. NEALE.”

The burden of appellant’s argument is that the court, having held the agreement enforceable, could not vary the terms of the agreement. He relies on *Underwood v. Underwood,*64 So.2d 281 (Fla.1953); and *Davis v. Davis,*301 So.2d 154 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

We hold that the court, as the trier of law and fact, had the authority to interpret the language of the agreement, as it did, so as not to include these parcels of property owned separately by the wife. See the principles of law in *Pipkin v. FMC Corporation,*427 F.2d 353 (5th Cir. 1970).

A second point claims error upon the denial of the husband’s motion for attorney’s fees. The denial was proper where, as here, the husband secured by the agreement all of the jointly-held property of the parties, which was extensive.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10.3

                         PROMISSORY NOTE

                                                        Salt Lake City, Utah
$20,548.00                                           Date: November 30, 2001


      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, DRACO HOLDING CORPORATION
(hereinafter "Maker") promises to pay to the order of STEVEN D. MOULTON, at
4843 South Wallace Lane, Salt Lake City, Utah 84117 (hereinafter "Payee"), the
principal sum of Twenty Thousand Five Hundred Forty Eight and 00/100 Dollars
($20,548.00) in lawful money of the United States of America, together with
interest thereon at the rate of ten percent (10.0%) per annum until paid in
full.  The principal balance of this Note represents various loans and
advances made by Payee to Maker during the first eleven (11) months of 2001.

     Payment of principal together with all accrued interest shall be due upon
demand by the holder hereof.

     The Maker of this Promissory Note shall have the privilege, without
penalty or premium, of paying in advance the entire principal or any portion
thereof.

     In the event that any portion of principal or interest is not paid when
due, it shall thereafter bear interest at the rate of twelve percent (12.0%)
per annum, both before and after judgment, until paid in full.  In the event
of default on any payment herein provided for, then without notice,
presentment or demand, the principal sum hereof together with any accrued
interest thereon shall, at the option of the holder of this Promissory Note,
become due and payable immediately.  Failure to delay in exercising its option
shall not constitute a waiver of any such breach or default nor waiver of the
holder's right to exercise said option upon any subsequent breach or default.

     The undersigned hereby expressly waives all statutes of limitation
affecting the enforceability of this Promissory Note, and agree to pay all
reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred in collection of payments due, or
in the enforcement of any right or remedy hereunder.  The Makers, assumers,
endorsers, sureties, and guarantors of this Promissory Note consent to all
renewals, indulgences, extensions, and all releases of security granted or
permitted by the owner or holder without notice.

     Payment of this promissory note is unsecured.

                                  MAKER:

                                  DRACO HOLDING CORPORATION



                                  By /s/ Lane Clissold
                                     Lane Clissold, President
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GSI Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael E. Katzenstein, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael E. KatzensteinMichael E. Katzenstein
Principal Executive Officer


October 1, 2010

This Certification shall not
be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, or incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filings to the Report.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GSI Group Inc. and will be retained by GSI Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3060 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3060

To establish a Youth Mental Health Research Initiative in the National 
Institutes of Health for purposes of encouraging collaborative research 
                    to improve youth mental health.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2023

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mrs. Britt) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish a Youth Mental Health Research Initiative in the National 
Institutes of Health for purposes of encouraging collaborative research 
                    to improve youth mental health.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Youth Mental Health Research Act''.

SEC. 2. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH ON YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH.

    Part B of title IV of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 284 
et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 409K. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH ON YOUTH MENTAL HEALTH.

    ``(a) In General.--The Director of NIH shall establish a Youth 
Mental Health Research Initiative, to be led by the Director of the 
National Institute of Mental Health, in collaboration with the Director 
of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development and the Director of the National Institute on 
Minority Health and Health Disparities, to coordinate and encourage 
collaboration among the national research institutes and national 
centers with respect to fundamental and applied research on youth 
mental health, including--
            ``(1) social, behavioral, cognitive, and developmental 
        research, to build resilience, increase the capacity of 
        communities to identify and care for youth at risk or in 
        crisis; and
            ``(2) research to improve the targeting and delivery of 
        mental health interventions in clinical and community settings 
        where youth live, play, work, and learn.
    ``(b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $100,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2024 through 2028.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ex parte STATE PERSONNEL BOARD of the State of Alabama et al.

77-383.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 28, 1978.

SHORES, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26448]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 31, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Philip Jackson, Applications 
Officer) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. Midland Bancshares, Inc., Kincaid, Illinois; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of The 
Midland Community Bank, Kincaid, Illinois.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Pat Marshall, Manager of 
Analytical Support, Consumer Regulation Group) 101 Market Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. Greater Bay Bancorp, Palo Alto, California; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Peninsula Bank of Commerce, Millbrae, 
California.
    2. Heritage Financial Corporation, Olympia, Washington; to become a 
bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Heritage Savings Bank, Olympia, Washington. Applicant is converting 
from mutual to stock form.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 1, 
1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-26448 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
## **EXHIBIT 31.2**

# **INSWEB CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, William D. Griffin, Chief Financial Officer ofInsWeb Corporation, certify that:

(1)                                  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of InsWeb Corporation;

(2)                                  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

(3)                                  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

(4)                                  The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), for theregistrant and we have:

a.           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.           Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 (5)                               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors:

a.           All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
|                       | ** ** | **/s/ WILLIAM D. GRIFFIN** | ** ** |
|-----------------------|------------|----------------------------|------------|
| Dated: August 9, 2006 | ** ** | **William D. Griffin**     |
|                  |       | Chief Financial Officer    |

 

----
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 30 

AN ACT 

To authorize major medical facility projects for the Department of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2023, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 30 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Year 2023 Vet3 erans Affairs Major Medical Facility Authorization Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF MAJOR MEDICAL FACILITY 

5 PROJECTS OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

6 AFFAIRS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

8 may carry out the following major medical facility projects 

9 in fiscal year 2023 at the locations specified and in an 

10 amount for each project not to exceed the amount speci11 fied for such location: 

12 (1) Construction of a community-based out13 patient clinic and national cemetery in Alameda, 

14 California, in an amount not to exceed 

15 $395,000,000. 

16 (2) Construction of a community living center 

17 and renovation of domiciliary and outpatient facili18 ties in Canandaigua, New York, in an amount not 

19 to exceed $506,400,000. 

20 (3) Construction of a new health care center in 

21 El Paso, Texas, in an amount not to exceed 

22 $700,000,000. 

23 (4) Seismic upgrade and specialty care improve24 ments in Fort Harrison, Montana, in an amount not 

25 to exceed $88,600,000. 
3 

†S 30 ES

1 (5) Realignment and closure of the Livermore 

2 campus in Livermore, California, in an amount not 

3 to exceed $490,000,000. 

4 (6) Construction of a new medical facility in 

5 Louisville, Kentucky, in an amount not to exceed 

6 $1,013,000,000. 

7 (7) Seismic retrofit and renovation, roadway 

8 and site improvements, construction of a new spe9 cialty care facility, demolition, and expansion of 

10 parking facilities in Portland, Oregon, in an amount 

11 not to exceed $523,000,000. 

12 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

13 authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Veterans 

14 Affairs for fiscal year 2023 or the year in which funds 

15 are appropriated for the Construction, Major Projects ac16 count, $3,716,000,000 for the projects authorized in sub17 section (a). 

Passed the Senate March 21, 2023. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 30 

AN ACT 

To authorize major medical facility projects for the 

2023, and for other purposes. Department of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51648-51649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26080]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3765-000]


Allegheny Power Service Corporation, on Behalf of Monongahela 
Power Company, the Potomac Edison Company, and West Penn Power Company 
(Allegheny Power); Notice of Filing

September 26, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 4, 1997, Allegheny Power Service 
Corporation on behalf of Monongahela Power Company, the Potomac Edison 
Company, and West Penn Power Company tendered for filing an amendment 
in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before October 10, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the

[[Page 51649]]

Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26080 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2970 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to designate Indigenous Peoples’ 

Day as a legal public holiday, to replace the term ‘‘Columbus Day’’ 

with the term ‘‘Indigenous Peoples’ Day’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Mr. HEINRICH (for himself, Mr. LUJA ́N, Mr. PADILLA, Ms. SMITH, Mr. 

KAINE, Ms. WARREN, Mr. MERKLEY, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. SCHATZ, 

Mr. HICKENLOOPER, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. SANDERS, and Mr. BOOKER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to designate Indigenous Peoples’ Day as a legal public holiday, to replace 

the term ‘‘Columbus Day’’ with the term ‘‘Indigenous 

Peoples’ Day’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Indigenous Peoples’ 

5 Day Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2970 IS

1 SEC. 2. INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ DAY AS A LEGAL PUBLIC 

2 HOLIDAY. 

3 Section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code, is 

4 amended by striking the item relating to Columbus Day 

5 and inserting the following: 

6 ‘‘Indigenous Peoples’ Day, the second Monday 

7 in October.’’. 

8 SEC. 3. TERM ‘‘COLUMBUS DAY’’ REPLACED. 

9 Any reference to ‘‘Columbus Day’’ in any law, rule, 

10 regulation, or other official paper in effect as of the date 

11 of enactment of this Act shall be deemed to be a reference 

12 to ‘‘Indigenous Peoples’ Day’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT
23.2








CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and amendments thereto:





Form S-8
No. 333-115851


Form S-8
No. 333-161138


Form S-8
No. 333-157728


Form S-8
No. 333-135525


Form S-4
No. 333-144497


Form S-3
No. 333-150561





of Sun
Healthcare Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 5, 2008 (except for Notes 2(n)
and 8(b) as to which the date is March 4, 2010), with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sun Healthcare Group, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2009.








/s/ Ernst
& Young LLP








Dallas,
Texas


March 4,
2010
#### David GOLDNER, Appellant, v. Helen B. GOLDNER, Appellee.

No. 69-460.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 26, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.