NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy 

Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308

From the Building to the Grid: 

An Energy Revolution and 

Modeling Challenge

Workshop Proceedings

Benjamin Kroposki and Connie Komomua

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Mark O’Malley

University College Dublin

Technical Report

NREL/TP-6A00-56056

January 2013
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy 

Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

15013 Denver West Parkway

Golden, Colorado 80401

303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov

Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308

From the Building to the Grid: 

An Energy Revolution and 

Modeling Challenge 

Workshop Proceedings

Benjamin Kroposki and Connie Komomua

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Mark O’Malley

University College Dublin

Prepared under Task No.2940.5017

Technical Report

NREL/TP-6A00-56056

January 2013
NOTICE

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. 

Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, 

express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of 

any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately 

owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, 

trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, 

or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors 

expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof.

Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/bridge

Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy

and its contractors, in paper, from:

U.S. Department of Energy

Office of Scientific and Technical Information

P.O. Box 62

Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062

phone: 865.576.8401

fax: 865.576.5728

email: mailto:reports@adonis.osti.gov

Available for sale to the public, in paper, from:

U.S. Department of Commerce

National Technical Information Service

5285 Port Royal Road

Springfield, VA 22161

phone: 800.553.6847

fax: 703.605.6900

email: orders@ntis.fedworld.gov

online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/help/ordermethods.aspx

Cover Photos: (left to right) PIX 16416, PIX 17423, PIX 16560, PIX 17613, PIX 17436, PIX 17721

Printed on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 10% post consumer waste.
Acknowledgments

This report summarizes two workshops jointly sponsored by the National Renewable Energy 

Laboratory and University College Dublin. The authors would like to thank everyone involved in the 

logistics of making these workshops a huge success. And a special thanks goes out to the participants–

on both continents–who freely shared their technical expertise and are respected for their enthusiasm, 

commitment, and key contributions. Mark O’Malley acknowledges the financial support of Science 

Foundation Ireland under Grant Number SFI/09/SRC/E1780 and travel fellowship 06/CP/E005-STTF11.
v 

Table of Contents

1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1

1.1 Workshop Motivation .................................................................................................................. 1

1.2 Workshop Objective..................................................................................................................... 1

1.3 Workshop Structure and Guiding Questions............................................................................... 1

2 NREL, Golden, Colorado (May 1-2, 2012) ........................................................................................... 2

2.1 Participants................................................................................................................................... 2

2.2 Agenda .......................................................................................................................................... 2

2.3 Workshop Objectives: Group Discussion ..................................................................................... 3

2.4 Workshop Questions: Roundtable Discussion ............................................................................. 4

2.5 NREL Workshop Results............................................................................................................... 7

2.6 Next Steps: Action Items............................................................................................................ 14

2.7 NREL’s Energy Systems Integration Facility ............................................................................... 14

3 University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland (June 6-7, 2012)............................................................. 14

3.1 Participants................................................................................................................................. 15

3.2 Agenda ........................................................................................................................................ 15

3.3 Workshop Objectives: Group Discussion ................................................................................... 16

3.4 Workshop Questions: Roundtable Discussion ........................................................................... 17

3.5 Workshop Results....................................................................................................................... 19
1 

1 Introduction 

Buildings are universal and shelter virtually every aspect of our lives—we work, live, learn, govern, heal, 

worship, and play in buildings. As a result, buildings have a significant impact on energy use and the 

environment. According to the U.S. Energy Information Agency, homes and commercial buildings use 71% 

of the electricity in the United States and this number will rise to 75% by 2025. Opportunities abound for 

reducing the enormous amount of energy consumed by buildings. NREL is at the forefront in developing 

advanced building technology and science to reduce the amount of energy consumed in our nation's 

buildings—our goal is to significantly improve the energy efficiency of buildings and to accelerate the 

use of renewable energy technologies within the next decade.

1.1 Workshop Motivation

To address modeling and simulation challenges in integrating building energy management systems with 

those of the grid, the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 

in conjunction with the University College Dublin held two industry workshops entitled: From the 

Building to the Grid: An Energy Revolution and Modeling Challenge. The first workshop was held on May 

1-2, 2012 on NREL’s campus in Golden, Colorado. The second was held on June 6-7, 2012 at the 

University College Dublin, in Dublin, Ireland. 

1.2 Workshop Objective

The objective of these workshops was to engage the university and laboratory research communities to 

identify and define research directions for building energy management systems modeling and 

integration with the grid. Desired outcomes for the workshop were to 1) determine the value of 

integrating building energy management models with the grid and 2) generate and document a research 

agenda for advancing the development of new integrated models that link systems and models of 

buildings and grids. 

1.3 Workshop Structure and Guiding Questions

The structure of the workshop was mostly open forum discussion designed to encourage interaction 

among the group of participants. Workshop discussions were guided by the following four framing 

questions: 

1. Is there value to integrating the existing models in building energy management systems with 

those of the grid?

a. If so, what are the particular research problems that these integrated models can 

tackle?

b. If there is not then how should these two modeling domains interact?

2. Is there a need to develop new models that span both domains?

a. If so, what are the particular research problems that these integrated models can 

tackle?

3. Does the ability to collect and process large amounts of performance data enable better models 

and create linkages between the actual systems and models of buildings and grids? 

4. What is the role of hardware-in-the-loop testing?
2 

The findings from each workshop are documented in this summary report. 

2 NREL, Golden, Colorado (May 1-2, 2012)

The first From the Building to the Grid: An Energy Revolution and Modeling Challenge workshop was 

held on the NREL campus in Golden, Colorado on May 1-2, 2012. 

2.1 Participants

Name Affiliation

Amir Roth DOE 

Annabelle Pratt Intel 

Ben Kroposki NREL 

Bruce D’Amora IBM 

Connie Komomua NREL

Duncan Callaway UC Berkely 

Greg Dobbs GPIC/Penn State 

Gregor Henze CU Boulder 

Jim McCally Iowa State 

Josh Hambrick NREL 

Kara Clark NREL 

Larry Brackney NREL 

Mark O’Malley UC Dublin 

Ralph Muehlesien Argonne 

Roger Dugan EPRI 

Sid Suryanaraynan CSU 

Sila Kiliccote LBNL 

Zhi Zhou Argonne 

2.2 Agenda

From the Building to the Grid: An Energy Revolution and Modeling Challenge

Workshop Agenda

May 1, 2012

8:30-9:00 Welcome and Introductions

9:00-10:00 Background 

• Energy systems integration (O’Malley)

• ESIF (Kroposki)

• Discussion of workshop objectives

10:30-12:00 Round Table discussion of workshop questions (Each person is given 5 minutes to discuss 

these questions)
3 

• Is there value to integrating the existing models in building energy management systems with 

those of the grid?

o If so, what are the particular research problems that these integrated models can tackle?

o If there is not then how should these two modeling domains interact?

• Is there a need to develop new models that span both domains?

o If so, what are the particular research problems that these integrated models can tackle?

• Does the ability to collect and process large amounts of performance data enable better models 

and create linkages between the actual systems and models of buildings and grids and what is the 

role of hardware-in-the-loop testing?

1:00-3:00 Summarize morning discussion – come to consensus on issues. 

Develop up to six research questions in ESI.

3:30-4:30 Development of hypothetical research program around the key issues

4:30-5:30 Tour of RSF and ESIF

May 2, 2012

8:30-10:00 Summarize yesterday’s meeting and discussion

• Develop specific actions that group can take on in the ESI area

• Arrange panel sessions at conference, influence research agencies, influence IEA working groups, 

collaborative papers or invited papers

• Understand how ESIF can play a significant role

10:30-11:15 Summarize workshop (possible read out to select ESI TRP members)

11:15 Conclude workshop

11:15-noon Optional RSF tour

The workshop agenda featured introductory presentations by Mark O’Malley, UCD, on energy systems 

integration and Ben Kroposki, NREL, on the Energy Systems Integration Facility at NREL. The 

presentations were followed by a group discussion on the workshop objectives. 

2.3 Workshop Objectives: Group Discussion

At the beginning of the first day, participants were asked to share their expectations of the 

workshop. They expressed the following needs that focused around EVs, timescales, 

characterization of sources, and control strategies: 

• Need enabling technology like real-time pricing

• Need Increased utility participation 

• Need to figure out RTO modeling requirements

o Control systems capable of responding to reliability events

o On what time scale?

o Operational, production costs, etc. 

• Need modeling capabilities need to span from design and site plan to operations 

• Need large scale simulation and testing capabilities 
4 

• Need frequency regulation and peak avoidance models for EV charging in residential vehicles 

• Need to figure out the effect of new technologies (from a short term/long term viewpoint) on 

the distribution system

• Need transparencies in the data. Need to be able to show the effect of the technologies to make 

change to policy and rate design.

• Need to be able to analyze demand charges versus energy charges for better optimization. 

• Need to be able to see into the level of the building model with a level of granularity not 

currently available.

• Need to education building energy managers

• Need models to look at aggregation of loads and characterizing loads, plus the controls that go 

with it.

The general consensus of the group was that it is better to simulate first; then build. The more that is 

known ahead of time the better. Know what these systems should look like and how the perform before 

buildings them. Work should be done up front, not after. 

2.4 Workshop Questions: Roundtable Discussion

Participants were then given 5 minutes each to comment from an industry perspective on the workshop 

questions. The following is a summary of participant comments grouped by industry focus. 

Distribution Modeling and Simulation 

Building models are no use to electrical models. Need higher fidelity load models and can’t get that from 

a building model. Zip models don’t help is understand “energy over time” – needed for a building / 

electrical modeling framework. The question then is: what type of interaction between building energy 

performance and electrical load models do we need? Trying to understand areas where you would need 

results from both.

• Conservation voltage reduction

• Grid-scale energy storage (not worked out yet or easy to model) 

• AC/DC hybrid microgrids

The more we can take the two frameworks and work together, the better.

Transmission

What is the variability of the load in aggregate? Chasing aggregate load is the focus, not one building or 

group of buildings. 

Maybe something is needed in the middle, aggregated and individual loads. But, beware of creating an 

“unmanageable giant”. 

Utility load modeling is always a challenge, how will they manage integration pieces that come onto the 

grid? 

• Making better use of transmission is important because of procedural and operational 

constraints we put on the system. 
5 

• Make the system more flexible in its ability to respond. 

Buildings

Particularly concerned about understand the end-uses in the building. 

Big system models don’t let us get into the individual variability in loads – basically, we look at loads in 

dis-aggregate: 

• Building grid control issues

• Managing site renewables and storage

We need to make sure that solutions that start from building management to the grid connected model 

have the ability to reach HIL solution and the ability to swap hardware in and out to assess the 

characteristics of an optimal design solution. 

We need to aggregate loads at some level, but not at the base. A possible new business entity: an 

aggregator between the two: buildings-to-grid. 

From the aggregator level, the building model should know aggregator and the other buildings. What 

piece of the building model does the grid need to understand? 

• Aggregator can provide load demand curve. 

• Capability of building to be able to provide ancillary services; spinning reserves.

• Real time pricing information important to help demand response management.

Architectural Engineering

Retail meters are artificial barriers. Benefits reside on timescales. Buildings can provide electricity by 

relying on forecasting strategies. 

Buildings can provide ancillary services, spinning reserves. What impact does this have on reliability? If 

we allow them to participate in frequency regulation how do we regulate and verify?

Harnessing large amounts of data in some meaningful fashion -- what is the right model complexity? 

Large commercial buildings into grid operations have to understand how one supervisory control has an 

affect – need to be able to go down into the lower levels. Loops are generally commissioned to begin 

with, how do we identify the appropriate model of the building based on set points at the level of an 

entire building? 

What’s the whole engineering bottleneck to making it work? Building model should inform the 

aggregate system model.

Building Management

Building management in grid integration is important in order for buildings to respond more actively.

Sending signals from the grid to buildings in intelligent feedback begs the questions: 

• What level of details? 
6 

• What geographic scale makes sense to model?

• Time scales? Customer software development or existing?

Demand Response

Emerging countries are currently developing ac/dc distributed centralized grids. In the sense of planning, 

simulation is important. 

DR integration with grid and buildings side is not just about load, generation, storage....think about 

behind the meter in different time scales. Sensors will allow us the opportunities to calibrate some of 

the integrated models now that we have some data. Can we integrate simulation into our building 

operations to optimize building operations? 

Analytics/Data

Equally important as data collection is the analytics components. Massive amounts of data to be 

collected from many different buildings and the information can be reported back to building operators. 

• Simulating virtual power grid. Combination of simulation and analytics try to predict how the 

real grid will behave over a period of time.

• Extracting information from data. Give it back to the buildings operators in a way building 

people can use it to optimize operations. New tools that model a different system – model 

renewables. 
7 

2.5 NREL Workshop Results

Key findings from two days of presentations, discussions, and participant reporting during the 

buildings integration workshop are summarized as follows:

1. Is there value to integrating the existing models in building energy management systems with 

those of the grid? Yes.

a. If so, what are the particular research problems that these integrated models can 

tackle? See details below. 

b. If there is not then how should these two modeling domains interact? N/A.

2. Is there a need to develop new models that span both domains? No need to create a “Super -all 

-encompassing” model, should create interactions between existing models, may need to 

develop features/models to fill gaps and better couple models.

a. If so, what are the particular research problems that these integrated models can 

tackle? See details below.

3. Does the ability to collect and process large amounts of performance data enable better models 

and create linkages between the actual systems and models of buildings and grids? There is a 

need to create linkages between data and models. 

4. What is the role of hardware-in-the-loop testing? See details below. 
8 
9 

Dist 

3*

Dist 

2*

ISO?

Dist 

1*

* Has to be Aggregated

Transmission 

Distribution 

Feeder 

2*

Feeder 

1*

PV Bldg 3

BEMS

EMS

* May be Aggregated

Feeder

LD PV LD

EMS

Bldg 2

BEMS

Bldg 1

BEMS
10
11
12
13
14

2.6 Next Steps: Action Items

How can we spread the word? What types of materials are needed to proceed and who will develop 

them? 

• Collect relevant materials (papers) on energy systems integration (ESI), data sources

• Clearly articulate story around ESI – develop material; develop use cases

• Create a framework for models

• Engage with utilities 

• Arrange Super Sessions at conferences to discuss this topic (panel sessions are typically seen by 

more people)

• IEEE-Power & Energy Society, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning 

Engineers (ASHRAE) - Greg, Sila, Sid

• American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), International Building Performance 

Simulation Association (IBPSA), IEEE-Conference on Decisions and Control, GridWeek, 

ConnectivityWeek - Sila 

• Association of Energy Engineers (AEE), Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), e-Energy - 

Ben, Mark 

• Special Issues on Journals (Power & Energy Society Transactions, IEEE Industry Applications 

Society Transactions, Energy and Buildings, Power & Energy, ASHRAE Journal, JBPS) Ben, Mark , 

Sid – sister articles in multiple magazines

• Task Force within larger existing group that may address these issues - Sid, Mark 

• PhD Summer School – American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) Simurex 2012 

(NREL host)

• Create a National Science Foundation (NSF) Center around the topic of energy systems 

integration.

2.7 NREL’s Energy Systems Integration Facility

It was determined by the group that the Energy Systems integration Facility at NREL can play a 

significant role in these efforts by: 

• Physical manifestation of the ESI concepts and research

• Major contributor to the HIL testing

• Need for a DMS/EMS simulator that can demonstrate large scale deployments of new 

technologies 

• Key: Need clear method to engage the use of ESIF. 

3 University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland (June 6-7, 2012)

The second From the Building to the Grid: An Energy Revolution and Modeling Challenge workshop was 

held on the University College Dublin campus in Dublin, Ireland on June 6-7, 2012.
15

3.1 Participants

Name Affiliation

Ian Pepper Cylon Group

Henrik Madsen DTU/RISO

Niamh O'Connell DTU/RISO

Jonathan O'Sullivan EirGrid

Jan von Appen Fraunhofer-IWES

Einar Larsen GE Energy

Dick Piwko GE Energy

Stan Zachary Herriot-Watt University

Michael Wurst IBM - Smart Cities

Ben Kroposki NREL

Stuart MacMillan NREL

Erik Ela NREL/ERC/UCD

Simos Oxizidis UCD School of Mechanical & Materials Eng

Ray Foley United Technologies Research Center

Stephen Duncan University of Oxford

Roisin Duignan ERC/UCD

Damian Flynn ERC/UCD

Olivier Neu ERC/UCD

Mark O’Malley ERC/UCD

Fabiano Pallonetto ERC/UCD

Jonathan Ruddy ERC/UCD

Hassan Wajahat ERC/UCD

3.2 Agenda

From the Building to the Grid: An Energy Revolution and Modeling Challenge

Workshop Agenda

June 6, 2012

9:00-9:30 Welcome and Introductions

9:30-10:30 Background 

• Energy systems integration (O’Malley)

• ESIF (Kroposki) 

• Discussion of workshop objectives

11:00-12:30 Round Table discussion of workshop questions (Each person is given 5 minutes to discuss 

these questions)

• Is there value to integrating the existing models in building energy management systems with 

those of the grid?

o If so, what are the particular research problems that these integrated models can tackle?

o If there is not then how should these two modeling domains interact?

• Is there a need to develop new models that span both domains?

o If so, what are the particular research problems that these integrated models can tackle?
16

• Does the ability to collect and process large amounts of performance data enable better models 

and create linkages between the actual systems and models of buildings and grids and what is the 

role of hardware-in-the-loop testing?

1:30-3:30 Summarize morning discussion – come to consensus on issues. 

Develop up to six research questions in ESI.

4:00-5:00 Development of hypothetical research program around the key issues

7:00 Dinner at The Orangerie Bar, Raddison Blu St. Helen’s Hotel (Hosted by the ERC)

June 7, 2012

9:00-10:30 Summarize yesterday’s meeting and discussion

• Develop specific actions that group can take on in the ESI area

• Arrange panel sessions at conference, influence research agencies, influence IEA working groups, 

collaborative papers or invited papers

• Understand how ESIF can play a significant role

11:00-12:00 Summarize workshop (possible read out to select ESI TRP members)

12:30-1:00 Discussion on differences/contracts/ similarities of two workshop ouputs

1:00 Conclude workshop

The workshop agenda featured introductory presentations by Mark O’Malley, UCD, on energy systems 

integration and Ben Kroposki, NREL, on the Energy Systems Integration Facility at NREL. The

presentations were followed by a group discussion on the workshop objectives. 

3.3 Workshop Objectives: Group Discussion

At the beginning of the first day, participants were asked to share their expectations of the workshop. 

They expressed the following needs that focused around real -time pricing, time scale, building models 

vs. grid models, information collection, validation, and control strategies:

• Need tighter integration of grid, more automatic control

• Need to know how much information is needed (time scale, granularity?)

• Need to develop a stability model, ensuring closed loop control.

• Need to determine infrastructure required, time resolution, develop validated

• models

• Need modeling to understand what DR is, and modeling to integrate the grid and building 

models.

• Need everything to be automated, consumer should not be aware of flexibility

• Need to split demand into different categories – what needs RT control, what needs 24hr 

planning etc.

Several key questions came out of the discussion, which were then used to ensure important issues 

were addresses during the workshop: 

1. How much do we need to model building level to see impact on grid level – to what detail level? 

Impact of (in) efficiency on flexibility available, what thermal storage available?
17

2. Do we want DR, what are the benefits, what time scale? At what level is control required / 

desired? Trade-off between level of accuracy and complexity of model, how much uncertainty 

can be taken out with feedback?

3. How can price be used to solve this problem, how can political issues be dealt with? How can 

user behavior be modeled? Psychology of user response to prices. Load coincidence issues.

3.4 Workshop Questions: Roundtable Discussion

Participants were then given 5 minutes each to comment from an industry perspective on the workshop 

questions. The following is a summary of participant comments and discussions: 

Participant Comments

• We first need to define what the model is for, what does the model have to support. What is the 

application in the real world? Who is the user, what are they trying to accomplish?

• The model needs to be a hierarchy for control, planning (one time stage feeds into another e.g. 

regulation to spinning to energy shifting) 

• Different people have different specifications, which have the potential to conflict. There needs to 

be a control action to realize that specification and be able to predict the response. 

• Time frame is essential, time scales of specification, effector and sensors need to be in line.

What is the specification, who is the user?

• Day ahead time scale is concerned primarily with hour to hour load shifting (energy management), 

contingency reserves look to 10 minute response, and regulation needs second to second response 

– more complex but not to be ruled out.

• How much data do I need, how much data do I want, how do I manage it?

Microgrid Discussion:

• Smart grids can be made economical through correct market design. How to determine the value of 

reliability – this will drive how markets are designed.

• In the US, security is main incentive for microgrids, not reliability, how much are you willing to pay 

for small amount of additional reliability?

• Cells will “grow” through aggregation of DERs that are gradually built up. Model levels are 

important. 

• If we model a whole country, no need for detailed response, but need to know dynamic response. 

Sophisticated models are not required.

• Models should be optimized for control/forecasting. 

Key output: There is no need for complicated building models if sole purpose is control. Simple 

representation is good; need to know how much you have and how fast it’ll work. If objective is to solve 

grid issues, detailed models of building models are relatively unimportant. But if you’re looking at what 

can go wrong with new functions, particularly those based on power electronics, you need more 

detailed models.
18

Building energy management system people are building detailed models of energy optimization, 

should they also build detailed models of electrical behavior?

• Building models may need to take voltage level of network into account (DP), currently they do not.

• Next generation thermostats and pumps build in detailed data recording to be fed into control 

functions.

• We need detailed model of residential area with high level of PV to determine level of buying from 

grid, selling to grid. No, we don’t, these will smooth. This is more of a voltage issue. Some more 

detailed models could be used for grid analysis.

• System operator currently changes transformer/upgrades network in cases of excess DG, need to 

consider alternatives. Building management can help with this. 

• The main question is: What are the main ways to use energy in a building, how can it be used as 

storage?

• Need to be able to avoid the increase of load coincidence where people are responding to the same 

price signal in the same manner for the same reason. 

• Need some kind of connection between building and grid models to see impact at point of common 

connection.

Key output: Thermal storage of buildings is in the range of 5-8 hours. Need models at different time and 

spatial resolutions. Also, there are different requirements for models – thermal, electrical, behavior. All 

interact but different purposes.

Is there value to integrating the existing models in Building energy management systems (BEMS) with 

the grid?

There is a greater need to model LV network, different people will want different control levels, may do 

in house optimization, or remote optimization.

What models exist in BEMS? Are they of any practical use?

• EnergyPlus, ASHRAE models

• These are useful for design purposes, but not used in real time energy management.

• Objectives are typically to minimize energy use and to keep in budget. Cylon system gives 

information on consumption in all buildings, and allows optimization of consumption. 

o Statistical model, not physical. 

o 15 minute time resolution.

• Need to know maximum and minimum demand, time dynamics. From a system operator 

perspective, this is just additional storage. This is different as it’s usually a customer. Need models to 

drive operational strategy, market strategy, policy strategy.

• Frequent readings are used to see model of building and to evaluate need for upgrades, and to use 

building as short term storage.

Are we in danger of over engineering things? In the end, will the applications be very simple. Who will 

pay for it?

It is advisable that we use complicated models as first step, then learn from these and develop scalable 

robust models. If your model is not accurate - may end up costing you money.
19

How much building energy is practically reducible?

• Superquinn reduces cost by 28% using Cylon building management system.

• Energy consumption in BEMS managed building can be different to expected – e.g. too many 

sensors in Microsoft

• Internal building grid required to run diagnostics.

• Energy savings can come from simple customer awareness – this is a natural reduction. Building 

modeling is a large effort, but can be done through simplified models and learning from data.

• A lot of potential within interruptible loads alone (refrigeration, hot water). This is low hanging fruit 

– and has been exercised in US and France for generations. Even gas fired central heating has 

electrical circulation pump that has significant consumption which can be used for DR.

• DR will only take off on a domestic scale if society feels good about it.

• Simplified models should be used for grid models. Detailed models could be used to enhance 

efficiency of building.

3.5 Workshop Results

Key findings from two days of presentations, discussions, and participant reporting during the buildings 

integration workshop are summarized in the following set of slides: 
20
21
22
23
24

3.6 Next Steps: Action Items

How can we spread the word? What types of materials are needed to proceed and who will develop 

them? 

• Work on value proposition 

• Get message out to audience – TSO/DSO, aggregators

• Collaborative research possibilities

• Sessions at PES 

• Introduction of power systems work to control theorists

• IEA task 58

• Determination of value through regional analysis and customer collaboration.