alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Patrick D Matthews, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of Primary Business Systems, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August 14, 2003 | /s/                     | Patrick D Matthews |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|--------------------|
|                  | Patrick D Matthews      |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-K/A for the Year Ended  December  31, 2004 (the  "Report")  by
Tarrant Apparel Group ("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.



Date:   May 31, 2005                         By:      /s/    Corazon Reyes
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                             Corazon Reyes,
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
Summary	of	Interagency	Working	Comments	on	Draft	Language	under	

EO12866	Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Review.

OPTION A

EPA will require the fuel producer to include information in its Risk Mitigation Plan 

demonstrating that the fuel producer has an adequate mechanism (such as a state-administered 

fund, bond, or certificate of deposit) to ensure the availability of financial resources sufficient to 

cover reasonable potential remediation costs associated with the spread of giant reed or napier 

grass beyond the intended planting areas. Such information must be sufficient for EPA to 

determine whether a financial mechanism is necessary. 

EPA would consult with USDA and, if appropriate, other federal agencies on the need for 

and adequacy of such a mechanism before approving the RMP. 

EPA may, where appropriate, require the fuel producer to have such a mechanism. 

OPTION B

EPA will require the fuel producer to include information in its Risk Mitigation Plan 

sufficient for EPA to determine whether it is necessary to have a financial mechanism (such as a 

state-administered fund, bond, or certificate of deposit) sufficient to cover reasonable potential 

remediation costs associated with the spread of giant reed or napier grass beyond the intended 

planting areas. 

EPA would consult with USDA and, if appropriate, other federal agencies on the need for 

and adequacy of such a mechanism before approving the RMP. 

EPA may, where appropriate, require the fuel producer to have such a mechanism.
#### In Re a MINOR CHILD

High Court of American Samoa Trial Division

JR 133-90

November 24, 1993

Before KRUSE, Chief Justice, AFUOLA, Associate Judge, and BETHAM, Associate Judge.

Counsel: For Petitioners, Roger K. Hazell

Opinion and Order on Petition to Terminate Parental Rights:

The natural mother of the male child before the court is the sister of the proposed adoptive mother. They had agreed prior to the birth of the child that the natural mother would, upon birth, surrender the child to the proposed adoptive mother and her husband to raise as their own. The child, who is now seven years of age, has been raised and cared for by the proposed adoptive parents since birth. The adoption of the child is highly recommended by the Child Protective Services, Social Services Division of the Department of Human Resources.

This matter was first initiated by the natural parents, who filed their petition to relinquish their parental rights to the child on November 6, 1990, pursuant to A.S.C.A. § 45.0115(a)(5). However, since the filing of their petition, the natural parents moved to the mainland, and their petition remains pending as of this date.

One year later, the proposed adoptive parents filed their own petition, under the same docket number, to terminate the parental rights of the natural parents, pursuant to A.S.C.A. § 45.0115(a)(3). With the filing of the subsequent petition, the natural parents filed a form acknowledging service of the proposed adoptive parents’ petition, giving their consent to the termination of their parental rights in the child and waiving any right to further notice of the proceedings. It is this latter petition by the proposed adoptive parents which is now before the court.

*53The petition of the proposed adoptive parents is not supported by the evidence presented. Termination proceedings under § 45.0115(a)(3) "may only [be had] when the child has been neglected by his parents or is homeless." *In Re Three Minor Children,*3 A.S.R.2d 4, 7 (1986) (emphasis in original); A.S.C.A. §§ 45.103(19), 45.0401(1). Here the evidence simply does not demonstrate that the child before the court is "dependent and neglected" under any of the definitions provided in A.S.C.A. §45.0103(19). The petition for termination should, therefore, be denied.1

It is so ordered.

1

 In contrast to relinquishment proceedings, under A.S.C.A. § 45.0115(a)(5), which are voluntary in nature and wherein the natural parents are the petitioners, termination proceedings,A.S.C.A. § 45.0115(a)(3), are adversarial in nature with the natural parents being the respondents. *In Re Two Minor Children,*8 A.S.R.2d 75 (1988).

What the evidence points to here is a situation of voluntary relinquishment and quite obviously the apparent purpose behind the filing of the subsequent petition by the proposed adoptive parents was to avoid the necessity of requiring the attendance of the absent natural parents — the natural parents’ attendance at relinquishment proceedings is effectively required by A.S.C.A. § 45.0402. *See In Re Three Minor Children, supra;*DCR 23.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
  TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
  Quarterly Report of Pacific Magtron International Corp. (the "Company") on Form
  10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Theodore S. Li, Chief Executive
  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies
  with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
  of 1934; and

(2) The information contained
  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
  and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Theodore S. Li
  Theodore S. Li
  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
  June 11, 2004

A signed original of this
  written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
  acknowledging, or other wise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
  within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
  906, has been provided to Pacific Magtron International Corp. and will be retained
  by Pacific Magtron International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

28
255 La. 807

#### Succession of Clarence VEAL, wife of Robert A. MORGAN.

No. 50431.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 3, 1970.

In re: Sara Veal Watkins applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 230 So.2d 323.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE SUN
HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC. DECEMBER 31, 1996 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          14,880
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  282,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,877
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               363,148
<PP&E>                                         334,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,229,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          151,566
<BONDS>                                        483,453
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           511
<OTHER-SE>                                     571,626
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,229,426
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,316,308
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,107,821
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,970
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,466
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,930
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,536
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,536
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
        

</TABLE>
Docket Index for

EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0280

Section A:

EPA Rulemaking Documents

(Additional Documents)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7243
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PATRICIA RAE FRUETEL, a/k/a Joe, a/k/a The Expert, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-70-N, CA-95-983-N) Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 4, 1997 Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia Rae Fruetel, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no revers ible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fruetel , Nos. CR-91-70-N; CA-95-983-N (E.D. Va. July 22, 1996). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
124 STAT. 3536 PUBLIC LAW 111–324—DEC. 22, 2010 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2941: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111–635 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Sept. 28, 29, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 10, considered and passed Senate, amended. 

Dec. 16, House concurred in Senate amendment. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–324 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To reauthorize and enhance Johanna’s Law to increase public awareness and knowledge with respect to gynecologic cancers. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF JOHANNA’S 

LAW. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 317P(d) of the Public Health Service 

Act (42 U.S.C. 247b–17(d)(4)) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (4), by inserting after ‘‘2009’’ the following: 

‘‘and $18,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2012 through 

2014’’; and 

(2) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (6). 

(b) CONSULTATION WITH NONPROFIT GYNECOLOGIC CANCER

ORGANIZATIONS.—Section 317P(d) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 247b– 

17(d)), as amended by subsection (a), is further amended by 

inserting after paragraph (3) the following: 

‘‘(4) CONSULTATION WITH NONPROFIT GYNECOLOGIC CANCER

ORGANIZATIONS.—In carrying out the national campaign under 

this subsection, the Secretary shall consult with nonprofit 

gynecologic cancer organizations, with a mission both to conquer 

ovarian or other gynecologic cancer and to provide outreach 

to State and local governments and communities, for the purpose of determining the best practices for providing gynecologic 

cancer information and outreach services to varied populations.’’. 

Approved December 22, 2010. 

Dec. 22, 2010 

[H.R. 2941] 

anorris on DSK5R6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 773
99FGS02 Trackline StatisticsHome | Acronyms | Contents | Navigation | Profiles | Logs | Metadata | SoftwareTable 3. Cruise 99FGS02 trackline statistics. 
Total Number of Lines: 5Total of Line Lengths: 96723.4 m
LineNameStartTime(DOY:HR:MIN:SEC)EndTime(DOY:HR:MIN:SEC)LineLength(m)      grecon_1      321:15:04:57      321:19:02:23      27588.2      grecon_2      321:20:51:47      321:23:41:15      19175.9      grecon_3      322:14:54:19      322:19:06:49      28045.3      grecon_a      321:19:09:21      321:20:49:28      12412.8      grecon_b      322:19:08:08      322:20:29:07      9501.2Home | Acronyms | Contents | Navigation | Profiles | Logs | Metadata | Software | Index Page
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/773/html/table3.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, July 18, 2013, 04:44:06 PM
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396



February 16, 2001


RABAR MARKET RESEARCH, INC.
10 Bank Street
Suite 830
White Plains, NY 10606

Attn: Paul Rabar

Re: Smith Barney Principal Plus Futures Fund L.P.

Dear Paul,

     Please liquidate all of your positions in the above referenced fund in
an orderly fashion beginning immediately. This will effectively terminate your
management agreement with the fund.

          If you have any  questions,  please call  myself or Jennifer  Magro at
(212)723-5424.

Very Truly Yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMETN LLC



Daniel A. Dantuono
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3057 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3057

To prohibit allocations of Special Drawing Rights at the International 
   Monetary Fund for perpetrators of genocide and state sponsors of 
             terrorism without congressional authorization.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 17, 2023

  Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mrs. Fischer, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Braun, Mr. 
   Grassley, Mr. Scott of Florida, and Mr. Barrasso) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit allocations of Special Drawing Rights at the International 
   Monetary Fund for perpetrators of genocide and state sponsors of 
             terrorism without congressional authorization.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Dollars for Dictators Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ALLOCATIONS OF SPECIAL DRAWING RIGHTS AT 
              INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND FOR PERPETRATORS OF GENOCIDE 
              AND STATE SPONSORS OF TERRORISM WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL 
              AUTHORIZATION.

    Section 6 of the Special Drawing Rights Act (22 U.S.C. 286q) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Unless Congress by law authorizes such action, neither the 
President nor any person or agency shall on behalf of the United States 
vote to allocate Special Drawing Rights under article XVIII, sections 2 
and 3, of the Articles of Agreement of the Fund to a member country of 
the Fund, if the government of the member country has--
            ``(1) committed genocide at any time during the 10-year 
        period ending with the date of the vote; or
            ``(2) been determined by the Secretary of State, as of the 
        date of the enactment of the No Dollars for Dictators Act of 
        2023, to have repeatedly provided support for acts of 
        international terrorism, for purposes of--
                    ``(A) section 1754(c)(1)(A)(i) of the Export 
                Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 
                4813(c)(1)(A)(i));
                    ``(B) section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 
                1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371);
                    ``(C) section 40(d) of the Arms Export Control Act 
                (22 U.S.C. 2780(d)); or
                    ``(D) any other provision of law.''.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges McClanahan, Haley and Senior Judge Willis 

WILLIAM R. BROWN 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2209-10-4 PER CURIAM 

 JULY 5, 2011 

COWLES NISSAN CHRYSLER AND 

 VADA GROUP SELF-INSURANCE ASSOCIATION 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (William R. Brown, pro se, on brief). 

 (Frederick T. Schubert, II; Angela F. Gibbs; Midkiff, Muncie & 

Ross, P.C., on brief), for appellees. 

 William R. Brown appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding 

he did not sustain a compensable injury by accident. He contends the commission erred in 

finding (1) there was insufficient evidence to conclude the Occupational Safety and Health Act 

(OSHA) requirement for “reasonably slip-resistant” treads on stairs applied to the location where 

he was injured; and (2) the condition of the stairs did not contribute to his injuries. We have 

reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Brown 

v. Cowles Nissan Chrysler, VWC File No. VA000-0001-9368 (Sept. 24, 2010). We dispense 

with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 
- 2 -

presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.1

Affirmed.

 1

 We (1) dismiss the show-cause order entered on January 31, 2011, and (2) deny 

appellees’ motion to dismiss filed on January 5, 2011.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANTHONY RITCHIE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 03-19 Erie

)

STEVEN DELUCA, et al., ) 

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on January 14, 2003, 

and was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and

recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules

72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, filed on July 20, 2005, [Doc. No. 30]

recommended that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 26] be granted. The

parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made

on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. No objections were filed. After de novo review

of the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 16th day of August, 2005,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is [Doc.

No. 26] is GRANTED. 

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated July 20, 2005, is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

The clerk is directed to mark the case closed.

s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: All parties of record. 

Case 1:03-cv-00019-SJM-SPB Document 31 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 1