alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3000 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3000

To repeal Freedom Support Act section 907 waiver authority with respect 
                      to assistance to Azerbaijan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 29 (legislative day, September 22), 2023

Mr. Peters (for himself, Mr. Rubio, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Van 
 Hollen, Mr. Ricketts, and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal Freedom Support Act section 907 waiver authority with respect 
                      to assistance to Azerbaijan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Armenian Protection Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. FREEDOM SUPPORT ACT SECTION 907 WAIVER REPEAL.

    Title II of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related 
Programs Appropriations Act, 2002 (Public Law 107-115) (22 U.S.C. 5812 
note) is amended, under the heading ``assistance for the independent 
states of the former soviet union'', in subsection (g)--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``(1)'';
            (2) by striking paragraphs (2) through (6); and
            (3) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (F) as 
        paragraphs (1) through (6), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 190 (Wednesday, October 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26023]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION


Temporary Relocation of the Office of the Secretary

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: The Office of the Secretary will be relocating beginning 
Monday, October 20, 1997, for approximately 2 to 3 weeks, to room 317, 
500 E Street SW., Washington, DC, 20436. Hours of operation and filing 
hours will remain 8:45 a.m.-5:15 p.m.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Secretary Donna R. Koehnke (202-205-
2000), Assistant Secretary Ruby J. Dionne (202-205-2799), or William R. 
Bishop (202-205-2000), Office of the Secretary, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Members of 
the media should contact Margaret O'Laughlin, Office of External 
Relations, at 202-205-1819. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need 
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact 
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000.

AVAILABILITY OF OFFICIAL FILES:

    The following services will be available during the temporary 
relocation:
    <bullet> The Electronic Document Imaging System (EDIS)
    <bullet> In-house duplication services (EDIS documents and new 
petitions/complaints only)
    <bullet> Fax-on-demand services
    <bullet> Paper copies of Commission publications.
    The following services will not be available during the temporary 
relocation:
    <bullet> Paper copies of investigative files
    <bullet> Microfiche files.

    Issued: September 24, 1997.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26023 Filed 9-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5009-5010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2574]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of 
Authority

    Part A, (Office of the Secretary), of the Statement of 
Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority for the 
Department of Health and Human Services, Chapter ABC, ``Office of 
Intergovernmental Affairs (OIA),'' as last amended at 61 FR 24311, 
dated May 14, 1966; and Chapter AC, ``Office of Public Health and 
Science (OPHS),'' as last amended at 60 FR 56606-06 dated November 9, 
1995 are being revised. The change is to transfer the military liaison 
and veterans affairs function from the OIA to the OPHS. The changes are 
as follows:
    I. Under Chapter ABC, ``Office of Intergovernmental Affairs,'' 
Section ABC.00 Mission, delete any references to the Office of Veterans 
Affairs and Military Liaison; and under Section 20 Functions, delete 
the fifth paragraph in its entirety.
    II. Under Chapter AC, ``Office of Public Health and Science,'' the 
``Immediate Office (ACA),'' add item #12 to read as follows:
    12. The Office of Veterans Affairs and Military Liaison provides 
advice and counsel and appropriate information and liaison to the White 
House, the Secretary, and the veteran's and military

[[Page 5010]]

organizations and associations; develops initiatives with the 
Department to improve services to veterans and the military; and 
focuses health and human resources on the needs of all veterans and 
military families as part of a Health and Human Services/Department of 
Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense initiative to better serve their 
health and human service needs. Provides coordinative support relating 
to sick, disabled and disadvantaged veterans/military for research 
targeted toward specific areas.

    Dated: January 28, 1997.
John J. Callahan,
Assistant Secretary for Management and Budget.
[FR Doc. 97-2574 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Senior Airman JESSE L. GIERKE

United States Air Force

ACM 38439

07 MAY 2014

Sentence adjudged 14 June 2013 by GCM convened at Mountain Home Air 

Force Base, Idaho. Military Judge: Grant L. Kratz (sitting alone).

Approved Sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 16 months, 

and reduction to E-1.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Captain Thomas A. Smith.

Appellate Counsel for the United States: Colonel Don M. Christensen and 

Gerald R. Bruce, Esquire.

Before

HELGET, MITCHELL, and WEBER

Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is subject to editorial correction before final release.

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error 

materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occurred. Article 66(c), 

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed, 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000). 

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

STEVEN LUCAS

Clerk of the Court
#### Johnny VINA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-459.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 4, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Albert COHEN, Appellant, v. Sadie MORGAN, Appellee.

No. 71-233.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 2, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Lavon Ward, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2663]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--United States Automotive Manufacturers Occupant 
Safety Research Partnership

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 30, 1996, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993,
U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), General Motors Corporation filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing an expansion of the scope of the 
United States Automotive Manufacturers Occupant Safety Research 
Partnership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, in addition 
to the nature and objectives originally published, the parties will 
combine their efforts to accelerate research on so-called ``smart'' air 
bags. To accomplish this objective, the parties, working in conjunction 
with government entities, universities and suppliers, will collect and 
examine field data that shows how occupants behave in air bag-equipped 
vehicles, work on understanding the nature and frequency of ``out-of-
position'' occupant injuries from air bags, work with government 
agencies on new regulatory standards for vulnerable occupants and 
research the various complex technology ideas for ``smart'' air bags. 
The parties may also perform other acts allowed by the National 
Cooperative Research and Production Act that would advance these goals.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the joint venture. Membership in the venture remains open, 
and General Motors intends to file additional written notifications 
disclosing all changes in membership.
    On July 7, 1992, General Motors filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on August 11, 1992 (57 FR 35845). On August 21, General Motors 
filed its last notification, changing the name but not the scope of the 
joint venture. A notice of that name change was published on October 6, 
1992 (57 FR 46047).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-2663 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
LOLO M. MOLIGA 

QOVlAHOR 

March 2, 2016 

Byron K. Huffman 

Acting Director 

OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 

AMERICAN SAMOA GOVERNMENT 

Telephone: (684) 633-4116 Fax: (684) 633-2269 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis 

800 Independence A venue, S W 

Washington, DC 20591 

Dear Director, 

LEMANU P. MAUGA 

LIEUTENANT OOVlANOA 

Serial: 078 

On November 24, 2015, my office received your letter requesting for our territory's eventual 

compliance with Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") Policy and Procedures Concerning 

the Use of Airport Revenue; Proceeds from Taxes on Aviation Fuel (79 Fed. Reg. 6628) and 

FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue (64 Fed. Reg. 7696, 

February 16, 1999). I am pleased to inform you that our territory is currently in compliance. 

Under 49 U.S.C. 41707(b), airport revenues are to be used for 1) the airport, 2) the local airport 

system, or 3) other local facilities owned or operated by the airport owner or operator and 

directly and substantially related to the air transportation of passengers or property. The FAA 

rules clarified and reiterated that proceeds from taxes on aviation fuel are airport revenue that 

must be used for the above purposes. 

Under our local law, A.S.C.A. 11.1002(a)(4)(E), proceeds from taxes on aviation fuel are, ''to be 

placed in the enterprise fund for the operation of Pago Pago International airport". Your letter 

asks for an Action Plan outlining our plan for compliance. This will be unnecessary as our 

aviation fuel tax laws are in compliance with federal law and FAA policy. Please contact my 

office if there is any other verification that needs to be submitted to the FAA. 

Sincerely, 

LA /Y). h1'"4• 

Lolo M. Moliga 

Governor of American Samoa
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
TranSwitch Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
TranSwitch Corporation and subsidiaries on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-69005 and
333-40897) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-75800, 333-70344, 333-44032, 333-83187,
33-94234 and 333-89798) of our report dated January 16, 2003, except for note 17
which is as of March 4, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
TranSwitch Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the related schedule, which
report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of TranSwitch
Corporation and subsidiaries. Our report refers to the Company's adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Tangible Assets", during 2002.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
August 11, 2003
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
  
 United Western Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-143096, 333-135570, 333-135568, and 333-135567) and Registration Statement No. 333-130550 on Form S-3 of United Western Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 3, 2009, except for Notes 2, 3, 6, 8, 12, 14, 15, 19, 20 and
28 which are as of August 7, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of United Western Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of United Western Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2008.
 
 As discussed in our report dated March 3, 2009, except for Notes 2, 3, 6, 8, 12, 14, 15, 19, 20 and 28 which are as of August 7, 2009,   United Western Bancorp Inc. and subsidiaries  retrospectively adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position Emerging Issues Task Force  03-6-1, “Determining
Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities”, and retrospectively applied Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement 144 , “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets”.
  /s/ Crowe Horwath LLP
 Sherman Oaks, California
 August 7, 2009
# NAIMA

NORiJ'H AMERICAN INSUl.ATION MANUFACTURERSAS.OC'IA:,.JON Celebrating 75 felli, of

EnergyEjJicicncy 

### VIAE-MAIL April 4, 2012 , Ms. SusanFairchild SectorPolicies and Programs Division Metals and Minerals Group (D243-02) Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environtnental Protection Agency 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research TrianglePark, NC 27711 RE: Follow-Up To March 19, 2012 Meeting DearMs. Fairchild: The North American Insulation Manufacturers Association ("NAIMA") appreciated the opportunity to meet with tl;te Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") on March 19, 2012. During that meeting with EPA, NAIMA stated EPA's proposed limits on formaldehyde, phenol, and methanol could notbe metby the majorityoffacilities. EPA was also reminded that the vast majority ofwool fiberglass manufacturers have switched from phenol formaldehyde binders to non-phenol formaldehyde binders, and, thus, are no longer subject to the MACT standard. Those facilities continuing to use formaldehyde binders will have a problem meeting EPA's proposed limits. As previously explained to EPA, specific performance requirements for certain products generally mandate that the level of binder be higher than that used for typical residential insulation. Typically, the specialized products have a higher loss on ignition ("LOI"). LOI is defmed by the current Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing MACT as follows: Loss on ignition (LOI) means the percent decrease in weight ofwool fiberglass after it has beenignited. The LOI is used to monitor the weight percent ofbinder inwool fiberglass. 1 EPA is setting a limit for the manufacture ofthese more specialized products using the emission numbers the lowest emission numbers

- from the manufacture ofa very differentproduct. NAIMA asks that EPA recognize and take into account the differences between these products and the differences required when doing compliance testing in the "MACT format," which

140 C.F.R. Part63, SubpartNNN, § 63.1381.

44 Canal Center Plaza' Suite 310 • Alexandria, Virginia 22314 • Tel: (703) 684-0084 • Fax: (703) 684-0427Ms. SusanFairchild April 4, 2012 Page 2
represents the worst-case reasonably foreseeable circlUDstances. EPA should setMACTfloors at these worst-case reasonably foreseeable circlUDstances to account for variability ofsources,2 and this variability should be reflected in the final emission limits. To effectively reflect this difference, NAIMA urges EPA to set limits based on data where higher LOI was used; this will result infeasible and realistic emissionlimits. Please do nothesitateto contactme ifyouhave any questions. Sincerely, AngusE. Crane Angus E. Crane Executive Vice President, General Counsel
cc: Mr. JeffreyA. Telander Sector Policies and Programs Division Metals and Minerals Group (D243-02) Office ofAir QualityPlanning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 109 TWAlexanderDrive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Mr. David Reeves RTIInternational P.O. Box 12194 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

2 Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition, et al. v. EPA, 255 F.3d 855, 863 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (citing SierraClub v. EPA, 167 F.3d 658,665 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).
.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: )

) Misc. No. 05-19 Erie

IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD E. )

FILIPPI, )

Petitioner )

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2005, the Petitioner having filed in this

Court a Motion to Supplement Record [Doc. # 23], the stated purpose of which is to

perfect his appeal from this Court’s Order entered on October 19, 2005, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said motion is DENIED, as the evidence which

Petitioner now seeks to incorporate into the record for appeal purposes was not part of

the district court record at the time this Court entered its October 19, 2005 Order. See

Fassett v. Delta Kappa Epsilon (New York), 807 F.2d 1150, 1156 (3d Cir. 1985). 

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All counsel of record.

Case 1:05-mc-00019-SJM Document 24 Filed 11/01/05 Page 1 of 1
#### Thomas Freddie WATTS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-89.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 18, 1970.

Rehearing Denied July 14, 1970.

M. Howard Williams, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen,, and Michael Minerva, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before this Court, the briefs and record on *30appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment and sentence of the lower court is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2509]



[[Page 4993]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-235-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Filing of 
Reconciliation Report

January 28, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 23, 1997, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing its final reconciliation report 
in compliance with Article I, Section 4(e)(ii) of the May 22, 1995 
Stipulation and Agreement in Docket No. RP94-325-000 (Settlement). The 
Settlement requires the filing of a reconciliation report as soon as 
practicable following the termination of the Firm GSR Settlement Rates 
for Sponsoring Parties and Subject Parties.
    Panhandle states that on September 30, 1996, it filed in Docket No. 
RP96-399-000 to suspend the GSR Settlement Reservation Surcharge for 
firm transportation services provided under Rate Schedules FT, EFT, and 
LFT and the GSR Settlement Volumetric Surcharge for service under Rate 
Schedule SCT for Sponsoring Parties and Subject Parties to the 
Settlement effective November 1, 1996. Panhandle's September 30, 1996 
filing was approved by a Commission letter order dated October 21, 
1996.
    Panhandle states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers, applicable state regulatory agencies and parties to 
the proceedings in Docket No. RP94-325-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with 18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or 
before February 4, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2509 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
| **CAPITAL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY** | Exhibit 32.1 |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------------|

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the AnnualReport of Capital Financial Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bradley P. Wells, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of myknowledge:

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1)    | the Report fully complies with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934, as amended; and                   |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | (2)    | the information contained in  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company. |

 

| Date: March 22, 2010 | By /s/ Bradley P. Wells                                         |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Bradley P.  Wells                                               |
|                 | Chief  Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and President |