alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

June 21, 2024 CR-2023-0692John Kaleb Gillespie v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Morgan Circuit Court: CC19-89) 

## NOTICE You are hereby notified that on June 21, 2024, the following action was taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
Exhibit 23.1
 
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-139671 and 333-165475 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 18, 2010, relating to the financial statements and financial statements schedules of EnergyConnect Group, Inc., which include an explanatory paragraph relating to substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of EnergyConnect Group, Inc. for the year ended January 2, 2010.
 
 
 /s/ RBSM LLP
 
 New York, New York
 March 18, 2010
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roanoke Technology Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
L. Smith, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respect, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ David L. Smith
----------------------------------
Name:   David L. Smith
Title:  Chief Executive Officer and
        Chief Financial Officer

Date:   March 22, 2005
EXHIBIT 23.3


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated September 26, 2007, on the accompanying combined
financial  statements  of  American  Rag for the year ended  December  31,  2005
included  in the  Annual  Report of  Tarrant  Apparel  Group for the year  ended
December  31,  2005.  We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in
Registration  Statement of Tarrant  Apparel Group of our report dated  September
26, 2007 relating to our audit of the combined financial statement,  included in
and  incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No.
2 of Tarrant Apparel Group for the year ended December 31, 2005.


SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP
--------------------------------------
Singer Lewak Greenbaum & Goldstein LLP

Los Angeles, California
October 10, 2007
1 

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-22-00242-CV 

________________

IN THE INTEREST OF M.E.

________________________________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from the 279th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. F-237,814

________________________________________________________________________ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to her child, 

M.E.1 See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.001. The trial court found by clear and 

convincing evidence that statutory grounds exist for termination and that termination 

is in the best interest of the child. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 161.001(b)(1)(D), (E), 

(F), (K), (N), (O), (P), (2).

1 To protect the identity of the minor, we use initials to refer to the child. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 9.8(b)(2).
2

Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel submitted a brief in which 

counsel contends there are no meritorious issues for appeal. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In re L.D.T., 161 S.W.3d 728, 731 (Tex. App.—

Beaumont 2005, no pet.). The brief provides counsel’s professional evaluation of the 

record, discusses the evidence at trial and the applicable legal standard, the trial 

court’s ruling, and why the trial court’s ruling is supported by sufficient evidence. 

Counsel concludes there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. Counsel 

certified that Appellant was served with a copy of the Anders brief. The Court 

notified Mother of her right to file a pro se response and of the deadline for doing 

so. Mother did not file a response with the Court. 

We have independently reviewed the entire record and counsel’s brief, and 

we conclude that there are no arguable grounds for review, that no reversible error 

exists, and that Appellant’s appeal is frivolous. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744 

(emphasizing that the reviewing court—and not counsel—determines, after full 

examination of proceedings, whether the appeal is wholly frivolous). As a result, we 

affirm the trial court’s termination of Appellant’s parental rights. We further find no 

arguable error requiring us to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief this 

appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).
3

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order terminating Appellant’s parental 

rights.2

AFFIRMED.

 ________________________________

 LEANNE JOHNSON

 Justice

 

Submitted on December 28, 2022

Opinion Delivered January 12, 2023

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Horton, JJ.

2 We note that if Appellant decides to pursue review by the Supreme Court of 

Texas, counsel may satisfy her obligations to Appellant “by filing a petition for 

review that satisfies the standards for an Anders brief.” In re P.M., 520 S.W.3d 24, 

27-28 (Tex. 2016).
Exhibit 23



The Board of Directors
Disc Graphics, Inc.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference  in the  Registration  Statement  No.
333-28013 on Form S-8 of Disc  Graphics,  Inc. of our report  dated  February 2,
2000,  except for notes 8(a) and 9, which are as of February 29, 2000,  relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of Disc Graphics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related  consolidated  statements of income,
stockholders'  equity  and cash  flows for each of the  years in the  three-year
period ended December 31, 1999 and related schedule, which report appears in the
December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Disc Graphics, Inc.



                                        KPMG LLP


                                        /s/ KPMG LLP
                                        ------------

Melville, New York
March 6, 2000
No. 00-7866 (00A597).

#### In re Glock.

Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1319

JERRY L. GENT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PAT L. SMITH,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge.

(MISC-97-1-A)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry L. Gent, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting leave to

proceed in forma pauperis yet imposing a partial filing fee. Appellant also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and

recusal of the district court judge. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion imposing the partial filing fee

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gent v. Smith, No. MISC-97-1-A (W.D. Va.

Feb. 24, 1997). Additionally, we grant Appellant leave to proceed

in forma pauperis on appeal. Further, Gent has not shown extrajudicial, personal bias; therefore, we deny his motion requesting judicial recusal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25886]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. 
Hawaiian Cement, Civil Action No. 97-01204 ACK was lodged on September 
16, 1997 with the United States District Court for the District of 
Hawaii. The consent decree settles a civil judicial enforcement action 
brought under Section 113(b) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 
Sec. 7413(b), for Hawaiian Cement's failure to achieve the emission 
limitations for particulate matter established by the Hawaii State 
Implementation Plan for defendant's Kapolei, Oahu, Hawaii, portland 
cement manufacturing plant, and for violations at that plant of 
applicable new source performance standards. Under the proposed 
settlement, Hawaiian Cement has committed to a comprehensive program of 
injunctive relief that will ensure that it achieves, and remains in, 
permanent, consistent compliance with the Clean Air Act. In addition, 
under the terms of the proposed settlement Hawaiian Cement has agreed 
to pay a civil penalty into the United States Treasury of $1,162,500.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Hawaiian Cement, DOJ Ref. #90-5-2-1-2083. The proposed 
consent decree may be examined at the office of the United States 
Attorney, District of Hawaii, PJKK Federal Building, Room 6100, 300 Ala 
Moana Boulevard, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96850; the Region IX Office of the 
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 75 Hawthorne Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G 
Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy 
of the proposed consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, 
Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy please refer to the 
referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of $13.25 (25 cents 
per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Walker Smith,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-25886 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Exhibit 32.4



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TransDigm Inc.
(the Company) for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended June 26, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory Rufus, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the
Company for the periods indicated.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 5, 2004



/s/ Gregory RufusName:

Gregory RufusTitle:

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary
Exhibit 32
  CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
  Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of MERGE HEALTHCARE INCORPORATED (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the SEC on the date hereof (the “Report”), Justin C. Dearborn, as principal
executive officer of the Company, and Steven M. Oreskovich, as principal
financial officer of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:
  (1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: March 11,
      2009
              
              By:
              
              /s/
      Justin C. DearbornJustin
      C. DearbornChief
      Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)Date: March 11,
      2009
              
              By:
              
              /s/
      Steven M. OreskovichSteven
      M. OreskovichChief
      Financial Officer(principal
      financial officerand
      principal accounting officer)
 
  This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WILLIAM J. STANKOWSKI, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-256 Erie

v. )

)

MARILYN BROOKS, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on September 7,

2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13], filed on

August 10, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be dismissed as moot and

that a certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days

from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified

mail and on Respondent. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition

and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the

following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DISMISSED as moot and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on August 10, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00256-SJM-SPB Document 14 Filed 08/29/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26534]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[PP 5E4597; FRL-5746-7]


Milliken & Company; Correction of Pesticide Petition

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice corrects and extends the comment period of 
pesticide petition (PP) 5E4597, submitted by Milliken & Company 
proposing to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance 
for Poly(ethylene glycol) modified FD&C Blue No. 1, Methyl 
Poly(ethylene glycol) modified FD&C Blue No. 1, and Poly(ethylene 
glycol) modified Methyl Violet 2B. Pesticide petition 5E4597, was 
published in the Federal Register on August 29, 1997 (62 FR 45804). EPA 
is extending the comment period to allow additional time for comment.

DATES: The comment period is extended to October 29, 1997.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Amelia Acierto, Registration 
Division, (7505C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. Office 
location and telephone number: 4th Floor, CS #1, 2800 Crystal Drive, 
Arlington, VA (703)-308-8377; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#640517070d0116100b4a050901080d052401140509050d084a0114054a030b12"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4d5c7d7ddd1c6c0db9ad5d9d1d8ddd5f4d1c4d5d9d5ddd89ad1c4d59ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA issued a Notice of Filing in the Federal 
Register of August 29, 1997 (62 FR 45804) (PF-758; FRL-5738-2) for 
pesticide petitions (PP) 3E4246, 7F4845, and 5E4597. This notice 
corrects PP 5E4597.
    In FR Doc. 97-23097, in the issue for August 29, 1997, on page 
45808, in the third column, in the first paragraph under PP 5E4597, the 
phrase ``not to exceed 0.6 parts per billion (ppb),'' should be 
corrected to read ``not to exceed 1 to 5% of the final formulation.''

List of subjects

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136a.

    Dated: September 25, 1997.

James Jones,

Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 97-26534; Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
255 La. 819

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Wilbert RIDEAU.

No. 50469.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 3, 1970.

In re: Wilbert Rideau applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

The application is denied. Applicant is not entitled to the relief sought.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26685]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Polar Programs; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

NAME AND COMMITTEE CODE: Special Emphasis Panel in Polar Programs 
(#1209).

DATE AND TIME: October 30th and 31st, 1997: 8:00 am to 5:00 pm.

PLACE: Room 730, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230.

TYPE OF MEETING: Closed.

CONTACT PERSON: Dr. Odile de La Beaujardiere, Program Director, Arctic 
Natural Sciences, Office of Polar Programs, Room 740, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 
(703) 306-1029.

PURPOSE OF MEETING: To provide advice and recommendations concerning 
proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.

AGENDA: to review and evaluate Arctic Natural Sciences 
multidisciplinary proposals as part of the selection process for 
awards.

REASON FOR CLOSING: The proposals being reviewed include information of 
the proprietary or confidential nature, including technical 
information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are 
exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the Government in the 
Sunshine Act.

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officr.
[FR Doc. 97-26685 Filed 10-3-97; 2:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary Of Transportation**.:,·.~~--** .•.**:_:"Th~~BqnorableRandyNeugeba~er.** '··
· U.S. House ofRepresentatives

Washington, DC 20515 Dear Congressman Neugebauer: 

### JUL 6

### 2012

..,**"'-~:** .**-~** .1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, DC 20590

Thank you for your letter supportingthe proposal submitted by the City ofAbilene for a grant
· underthe U.S. Department ofTransportation's Small Community Air-Service Qevelopment Program. The Stnall Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of40 grant**aw~;~Ids** each year, although no more than 4 awards may be to communities in the same State. In order to provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types ofprojects that can be funded. On May 15, the Department issued an order requesting that communities interested in receiving a grant this year file their applications by June 11. As these grant requests are pending before the Department, I cannot comment on the merits ofany particular proposal. I assure you that the Department will give full and fair considerationto all proposals that have-been properly filed. As is our normal practice, I am placing a copy ofyour letter and this response in Docket DOT-OST-2012-0069 as a contact outside the record ofthis matter. I appreciate your interest in this program. Sincerely yours,

Aloha Ley Associate Director Small Community Program(J RANDY NEUGEBAUER 19m DISTRICT, TEXAS**'~** .. «· I,**:."~** ·,. RooM 1424 lo::c.w:oRTH House OFFICE BUILOIIIG

WA,SH•::GTO:I, DC 20515·4319

Pt1o"e: (202) 225·4005 FAx: (202) 225·9615 www. randy.houso,gov randy@mail.house.gov

## C!ongres~ 

# of tbe mtntteb**~tates** ;!Jfoutie oflt\epre£Sentnti\Je£S

Ms. Aloha Ley Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Analysis 1200 NewJersey Ave., SE W86-310 Washington, DC 20590 DearMs. Ley: June 7, 2012 .**~..** ..

.,

I am pleasedto recommend the City ofAbilene for funding through the Departmei1t of Transpmtation Office ofAviation Analysis. With funding from.the Small Community Air Service Development Grant, the Abilene Regional Airpmtwill be able to increase customer choices by addingnon-stop service from Abilene to an additional airline. hub airport, increaseroute oppot1unities and capacity, reduce average fares paid by passengers using Abilene, and reduce leakage to other airpmts inthe region. I support the Abilene Regional Airport request for funding and ask that all due consideration be given to this wise investment opporttmity.

·_, Sincerely,

# ~ Randy Neugebauer
RN/sl 611 UwvEASITY Aver:uE SUITE 220 LUBBOCK, TX 79401

(806) 763·1611 ' -- t!rio ScuRAY SrREET SUiTE B B:o SPA ::o, TX 79720

(432) 264·0722 500CHESfiiUT

Sune 319 As•w<E, lX 79602

(325) 675·9779



# ..