alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Raymond W. GORDON, II v. John C. WATKINS, Warden, Mississippi State Penitentiary.

No. 50373.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 14, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 18, 1978.

Raymond W. Gordon, II, pro se.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Karen A. Gilfoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appel-lee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; Russel D. Moore, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and ROBERTSON and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

BOWLING, J., took no part.
Case 1:06-cv-00145-MBC   Document 12   Filed 08/30/06   Page 1 of 1
#### Rudolph LANE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-208.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 13, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 1 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 2 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 3 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 4 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 5 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 6 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 7 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 8 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 9 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 10 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 11 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 12 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 13 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 14 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 15 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 16 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 17 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 18 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 19 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 20 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 21 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 22 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 23 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 24 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 25 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 26 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 27 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 28 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 29 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 30 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 31 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 32 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 33 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 34 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 35 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 36 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 37 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 38 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 39 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 40 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 41 of 42Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 54 Filed 09/29/06 Page 42 of 42
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
STATEMENTS  FOR THE TWELVE  MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND AS OF MARCH 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                     0000904147
<NAME> EMERGING ALPHA CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         289,568
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               289,568
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 289,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,347
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       43,600
<OTHER-SE>                                     244,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   289,848
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               16,029
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,689
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,689
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,689
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .039
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .039
        






</TABLE>
Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 55 Filed 09/29/06 Page 1 of 2Case 1:03-cv-00259-JFM Document 55 Filed 09/29/06 Page 2 of 2
#### Hume WILSON v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 7629.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 11, 1937.

Mac Swinford, U. S. Atty., of Lexington, Ky.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It is ordered that the appeal herein be, and the same is, docketed and dismissed, pursuant to motion of appellee. Costs to be charged against the government as constructive earnings.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2784 

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to adjust 

the boundary of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VANCE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act 

of 1992 to adjust the boundary of the Dayton Aviation 

Heritage National Historical Park, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE NATIONAL HIS4 TORICAL PARK BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT. 

5 Section 101 of the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preser6 vation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww) is amended by add7 ing at the end the following: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2784 IS

1 ‘‘(d) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—In addition to the 

2 sites described in subsections (b) and (c), the boundary 

3 of the park is adjusted to include approximately 1 acre 

4 of land in Dayton, Ohio, depicted as ‘Proposed Addition’ 

5 on the map entitled ‘Dayton Aviation Heritage National 

6 Historical Park Proposed Boundary Addition’ and dated 

7 February 2023.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

JAMEY McKEE, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

B. SALAMAN, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 No. 4:22-CV-01240 

 (Chief Judge Brann) 

ORDER

AND NOW, this 25th day of July 2023, in accordance with the 

accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Defendants’ motion (Doc. 58) for partial dismissal under Federal Rule 

of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in 

part, as follows: 

a. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED insofar as Count 1 as to 

Anna, Count 2, Count 8 as to Steberger and Anna, and Counts 

12 through 18 are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Rule 

12(b)(6). 

b. Defendants’ motion is DENIED in all other respects. 

2. Count 10 is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be 

granted. 

3. McKee’s official capacity claims as to all Defendants are 

DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii) as 

they are either barred by Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity or 

are moot. 

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate defendants C. Collins and 

R. Burns. 

Case 4:22-cv-01240-MWB-MP Document 65 Filed 07/25/23 Page 1 of 2
2 

5. This case shall proceed on the following claims in McKee’s second 

amended complaint (Doc. 49): Count 1 as to Steberger and Hayles, 

Counts 3 through 7, Count 8 as to Hayles, Count 9, and Count 11. 

6. Defendants shall respond to the remaining Section 1983 claims listed 

in paragraph 5 above as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

15. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

 Matthew W. Brann 

 Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:22-cv-01240-MWB-MP Document 65 Filed 07/25/23 Page 2 of 2
SERVED MAY 12, 2011 

• • ' y ^MENT OF 

,.,'1 U i 1 \i \i I 

k'i 12 P 2- 2M 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ED STAUB & SONS PETROLEUM, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2011-0067 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

Respondent Ed Staub & Sons Petroleum, Inc. (hereinafter "Respondent") has 

requested that the discovery deadline set by the Procedural Order of June 1, 2011 be 

extended to a date after September 1, 2011 and that the date for hearing be 

appropriately extended. In support, it states that counsel was recently retained and that 

more time is needed to propound and complete discovery. 

For good cause shown, Respondent's Motion is hereby GRANTED. The deadline 

for completion of discovery is hereby extended to September 16, 2011, The hearing will 

be scheduled by subsequent order for a date some time after that. 

SO ORDERED. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2011-0067 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERIitpELIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AOC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONi? CPPY 

RnstyRinohaxt, Respondent's Counsel 

Rinehart Law Offices 

Attorneys and Counselors at Law 

2105 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 340 

Campbell, CA 95008 

TEL: 408-871-2696 

FAX: 408-871-2757 

Gerald A. Ellis, Complainant's Counsel , 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southern Region, ASO-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 r 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodmn, Acbuihisff^jve Lqw Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

tJ.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For 

address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 

Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591, Attrition: 

or by expedited courier, use the following 

Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wrigjit BuildingIJocket Clerk, AGCft30.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KEVIN HAMILTON, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 05-51 Erie

v. )

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on February 7, 2005,

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13], filed on

January 9, 2006, recommended that Defendant’s motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 10] be

granted. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file

objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendant. No

objections were filed. After de novo review of the motion and documents in the case,

together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 30th day of January, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 10]

is GRANTED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on January 9, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00051-SJM-SPB Document 14 Filed 01/30/06 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Mary Jean BOYD, Judy Carlson, James H. Evans, Stephen A. Gadberry, Carol Geiger, Sharon Ludlam, Mary Ann Moore, Connie Roger, Benjamin Saenz, Rozalian Tilardo, Appellees.

No. 69-83.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

May 5, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit
31.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Billy
M. Dodson, certify that:




1.  I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Ministry Partners Investment
Corporation (the “Company”);




2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;




4.  The
Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Company and we have:




(a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;




(b)  Intentionally
omitted;




(c)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation;




(d)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter (the
Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
material affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's
internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The
Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):




(a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




(b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.








Date:
April 11,
2008                                                                By:
/s/
Billy M. Dodson


Billy M.
Dodson


President
#### Gladys K. ROZAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph A. GUILLORY, and Dixie Auto Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 5987.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Aug. 9, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 15, 1977.*

Writ Refused Nov. 11, 1977.

Before HOOD, DOMENGEAUX, and WATSON, JJ.

Hood, J., noted for a rehearing.

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

This case was consolidated for trial and remained so on appeal with the case of *Rozas and Sonnier v. Guillory, Dixie Auto*
      *458
      *Insurance Company, and Hanover Insurance Company,*La.App., # 5986, 349 So.2d 453, in which a separate judgment is being rendered this date.

For the reasons assigned in that case, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Costs are assessed against defendant-appellant, Dixie Auto Insurance Company.

*AFFIRMED.*

HOOD, J.,

dissents for the reasons assigned in *Rozas, et al. v. Guillory, et al.,*La.App., 349 So.2d 453 (No. 5986 on our docket).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52532-52533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26605]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-54-000]


Louisiana-Nevada Transit Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

October 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 29, 1997, Louisiana-Nevada Transit 
Company (LNT), tendered for filing as part of its Third Revised FERC 
Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheet listed below, 
to be effective October 1, 1997:

Third Revised Sheet No. 56

    Pursuant to Order No. 472, the Commission has authorized pipeline 
companies to track and pass through to their customers their annual 
charges under an Annual Charge Adjustment (ACA) clause. The 1997 ACA 
unit surcharge approved by the Commission is $.0022 per Dth.
    Pursuant to Section 154.207 of the Commission's Regulations, LNT

[[Page 52533]]

requests that the Commission grant any waivers necessary to permit the 
tariff sheets contained herein to become effective October 1, 1997.
    LNT states that a copy of its filing has been served upon its 
customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests must be 
filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file and available for public inspection in the Public Reference 
Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26605 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Notice on Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Lease Sales

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: List of restricted joint bidders.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the 
Minerals Management Service by the joint bidding provisions of 30 CFR 
256.41, each entity within one of the following groups shall be 
restricted from bidding with any entity in any other of the following 
groups at Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease sales to be held 
during the bidding period from November 1, 1997, through April 30, 
1998. The List of Restricted Joint Bidders published March 27, 1997, in 
the Federal Register at 62 FR 14699 covered the period of May 1, 1997, 
through October 31, 1997.

Group I

    Exxon Corporation; Exxon San Joaquin Production Co.

Group II

    Shell Oil Co.; Shell Offshore Inc.; Shell Western E&P Inc.; Shell 
Frontier Oil & Gas Inc.; Shell Consolidated Energy Resources Inc.; 
Shell Land & Energy Company; Shell Onshore Ventures Inc.; Shell 
Deepwater Development Inc.; Shell Deepwater Production Inc.; Shell 
Offshore Properties and Capital II Inc.

Group III

    Mobil Oil Corp.; Mobil Oil Exploration and Producing Southeast 
Inc.; Mobil Producing Texas and New Mexico Inc.; Mobil Exploration and 
Producing North America Inc.

Group IV

    BP America Inc.; The Standard Oil Co.; BP Exploration & Oil Inc.; 
BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
Cynthia L. Quarterman,
Director, Minerals Management Service.
[FR Doc. 97-26852 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-M
#### HENRY A. KNOTT, INC., Petitioner, v. Reubin O’D. ASKEW, Governor of the State of Florida, et al., Respondents.

No. 41086.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 20, 1971.

Rehearing Denied May 26, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
Every seven minutes,

a pedestrian is killed or ‘ |

injured in a-crash.. -
Almost half arée-under the
influence of alcohol.

@

US.Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

FHWA-SA-06-11

Did YouKnow?

Cada siete minutos
~ un peaton muere o es
gravemente herido en
un accidente de trafico.
Casi la mitad de ellos
‘se encuentra bajola
~ influencia del alcohol.

~2S25 -
F aa, Se
irae a ~
Ome. —
<a < <<
.. . 4
“4 “Se
“a Sr.
—_. SS
ies i
Stay ®
## This Certificate certifies that



# Abel Hernandez Having satisfactorily completed the course of study And having passed the required examination in Flying,Controlling , Maneuvering and FAA Rules & Regulations is a 

### Qualified for

UAV Flight
Given under my hand on the 9 th Day of November, 2015 

### Ken Taboh