alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EDWARD J. NICHOLAS, )

Plaintiff, )

) C.A. No. 06-198 Erie

v. )

) District Judge McLaughlin

JOHN F. CHERRY, et al, ) Magistrate Judge Baxter

Defendants. )

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I. RECOMMENDATION

It is respectfully recommended that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without prejudice

to Plaintiff’s right to pay the filing fee of $350.00 before October 23, 2006. 

II. REPORT

Plaintiff, an inmate incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Albion, presented

this civil rights complaint, along with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Section 804(g) of Pub.L. No. 104-134, enacted April 26, 1996, amended 28 U.S.C. §

1915 to provide:

[i]n no events shall a prisoner bring a civil action ... under this section if the

prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any

facility, brought an action or appeal in the court of the United States that was

dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger

of serious physical injury.

28 U.S.C. §1915(g).

Plaintiff has been a prolific advocate in this federal court. At least three of Plaintiff’s

prior lawsuits have been dismissed as legally frivolous: Civil Actions Numbers 06-98 Erie, 06-

112 Erie, and 06-201 Erie, all filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of

Pennsylvania. 

Case 1:06-cv-00198-SJM-SPB Document 6 Filed 10/03/06 Page 1 of 2
2

An indigent inmate may overcome the “Three Strikes Rule” if he can show that he is

under “imminent danger of serious physical injury.” Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307

(3d Cir. 2001) (interpreting imminent danger). Plaintiff has not alleged such imminent danger.

Accordingly, Plaintiff must pay the full filing fee before October 23, 2006, or risk

dismissal of this action.

III. CONCLUSION

Because of these prior dismissals, and because Plaintiff has not alleged that he is in

imminent danger of serious physical injury, it is recommended that the complaint be dismissed

without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to pay the full filing fee of $350.00 to the Clerk of Courts

before October 23, 2006. 

In accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Local

Rule 72.1.4B, the parties are allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file written

objections to this report. Any party opposing the objections shall have seven (7) days from the

date of service of objections to respond thereto. Failure to timely file objections may constitute

a waiver of any appellate rights.

S/ Susan Paradise Baxter

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: October 3, 2006

Case 1:06-cv-00198-SJM-SPB Document 6 Filed 10/03/06 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52364-52365]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26691]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE: Weeks of October 6, 13, 20, and 27, 1997.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Week of October 6

Wednesday, October 8
3:30 p.m.  Affirmation Session (Public Meeting)
    a. Changes to Paragraph (h) of 10 CFR Part 50.55a, ``Codes and 
Standards''
    b. Sequoyah Fuels Corp. & General Atomics: Docket No. 40-8027--EA; 
LBP-95-18 and LBP-96-24, Memoranda and Orders (Approving Settlement) 
(Tentative)

Week of October 13--Tentative

Tuesday, October 14
10:00 a.m.  Briefing on EEO Program (Public Meeting) (Contact: Ed 
Tucker, 301-415-7382)
1:00 p.m.  Briefing on Severe Accident Master Integration Plan (Public 
Meeting) (Contact: Charles Ader, 301-415-5622)
Wednesday, October 15
10:00 a.m.  Briefing on PRA Implementation Plan (Public Meeting) 
(Contact: Tom King, 301-415-5790)
11:30 a.m.  Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed)

Week of October 20--Tentative

Tuesday, October 21
10:30 a.m.  Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed)

[[Page 52365]]

Week of October 27--Tentative

Wednesday, October 29
10:00 a.m.  Briefing on Proposed Steam Generator Generic Letter and 
Regulatory Guide (Public Meeting)
11:30 a.m.  Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (if needed)
1:00 p.m.  Briefing on Site Decommissioning Plan (SDMP) (Public 
Meeting)

    Note: The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change 
on short notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)--
(301) 415-1292.

Contact person for more information: Bill Hill (301) 415-1661.
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/SECY/smj/schedule.htm
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to it, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary, Attn: Operations Branch, 
Washington, D.C. 20555 (301-415-1661).
    In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the Internet 
system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission 
meeting schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7c0dadff7d9c5d499d0d8c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8dfae0e5cde3ffeea3eae2fb">[email protected]</span></a> or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#53373824133d21307d343c25"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="adc9c6daedc3dfce83cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
William M. Hill, Jr.,
SECY Tracking Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26691 Filed 10-3-97; 2:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of TranSwitch Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter J. Tallian,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

                                                       /s/ Peter J. Tallian
                                                      --------------------
                                                      Peter J. Tallian
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                                      August 12, 2003
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection  with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of China Elite Information Co., Ltd. (the Company) for the three month period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the Report),  I, Li Kin Shing, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)
        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   Date:  July 6, 2007
        By
        /s/ Li Kin Shing
 Li Kin Shing President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Cherokee Banking Company, (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  Dennis  W.  Burnette, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  and A.R. Roberts, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.


This 12th day of May, 2003.


 /s/ Dennis W. Burnette
-----------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer




 /s/ A.R. Roberts, III
----------------------
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operations Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.2

                            PRESIDENT'S CERTIFICATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report of The Bralorne Mining Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2002, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Rene Bernard,  President,  Chief  Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.




                                       /S/"Rene Bernard",
                                        ----------------
                                         Rene Bernard
                                  Chief  Executive  Officer
                                   President and Director

Date: January 12, 2004
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 316 

AN ACT 

To repeal the authorizations for use of military force against 

Iraq. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 316 ES

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILI2 TARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION. 

3 The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against 

4 Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102–1; 105 Stat. 3; 50 

5 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby repealed. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY 

7 FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002. 

8 The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against 

9 Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107–243; 116 Stat. 

10 1498; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby repealed. 

Passed the Senate March 29, 2023. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 316 

AN ACT 

To repeal the authorizations for use of military 

force against Iraq.
Exhibit 31.3

                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, Mark E. Scott, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IA Global, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

Date: February 3, 2004                  /s/ Mark E. Scott
                                        -----------------------
                                        Mark E. Scott
                                        Chief Financial Officer
#### Thomas G. O’CONNELL and Dorothy C. O’Connell, Appellants, v. Nick CARTER and Norma B. Carter, his wife, Appellees.

No. 69-489.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 13, 1970.

Hal H. McCaghren, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Zell H. Altman of Altman & Miner, Lake Worth, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Alabama-Florida Company v. Mays, 1933, 111 Fla. 100, 149 So. 61, 91 A.L.R. 139 and Cator v. Blount, 1899, 41 Fla. 138, 25 So. 283.

McCAIN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RANDY SPENCER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 08-329 Erie

v. )

)

MICHAEL J. ASTURE, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff’s social security complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on

November 26, 2008, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan

Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act,

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 18], filed on

March 1, 2010, recommended that the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc.

No. 11] be dismissed, and that the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc.

No. 16] be dismissed, and that the case be remanded to the Commissioner for further

proceedings. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file

objections. Objections were filed by the Plaintiff on March 9, 2010 [Doc. No. 19]. 

After de novo review of the documents in the case, together with the Report and

Recommendation and objections thereto, the Court declines to adopt the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation insofar as it recommends that the case be

remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Rather, the Commissioner will

be ordered to supplement the administrative record or notify the Court of his inability to

do so. See Andrews v. Astrue, 2010 WL 610933 at *3 (W.D.Ark. 2010). 

AND NOW, this 25 day of March, 2010; th

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Commissioner shall, within sixty (60) days of

the date of this Memorandum Order, supplement the record with the missing transcript

of the last hearing on August 3, 2007, as well as the additional records requested by

the ALJ during that hearing, as referenced in a letter from Attorney Chaban to ALJ

Case 1:08-cv-00329-SJM-SPB Document 20 Filed 03/25/10 Page 1 of 2
2

Porter dated October 4, 2007, Document # 4-1, page 380. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in the event the Commissioner is unable to

supplement the record, he is directed to notify the Court of his inability to do so. 

This matter will be administratively closed pending the submission of the

transcript and documents referenced above or a report from the Commissioner that the

record cannot be supplemented. 

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:08-cv-00329-SJM-SPB Document 20 Filed 03/25/10 Page 2 of 2
FoRRRwD Countermeasure Poster

Printing Instructions

Commercial Printer

Send this file to a local commercial print shop or the Government Printing Office, if required. The file is 

print ready, full color, and includes necessary bleed. They will use the second page of this PDF.

Note: if you wish to add your organization’s logo, you are free to do so. Please place the logo on the 

bottom-left of the poster and sized to the FoRRRwD and FHWA logos.

Poster Specs 

Trim Size: 24”x32”

Suggested Paper: 80 lb. Gloss

Ink: 4/0

Desktop Printing

File size is designed for oversized paper. Determine the maximum size capability of your printer 

and upon output, select “scale to size”. This will 

shrink the poster to the paper size chosen.

Section 508 Version

For a Section 508 version of this poster, click 

here to download the PDF.
Focus on Reducing Rural Roadway Departures 

Keep vehicles

in their lane

Reduce the

potential for

crashes

Minimize

crash severity

There are many countermeasures proven to reduce these crashes. They help keep vehicles in their lane, reduce the potential for crashes, or minimize crash severity.

The countermeasures have varying levels of safety benefit, maintenance, and overall cost. Use them to help you focus on reducing rural roadway departure crashes in your community.

www.safety.fhwa.dot.gov/FoRRRwD

30 people will die today from rural roadway departure crashes.

Let’s save the people behind the numbers.

Focus on Reducing Rural Roadway Departures

Source: FHWA Source: FHWA Source: Thurston County, Washington Source: FHWA

Source: FHWA Source: FHWA Source: FHWA

SafetyEdge Shoulder Widening Center Line Buffer Area Clear Zone SM

Barriers Breakaway Features

Source: Thurston County, Washington

Curve Signing

Alert drivers to changes in the road alignment and 

improve visibility of curves.

Source: Thurston County, Washington

Edge and Center Line Markings

Delineate the edges of the lane and provide a

preview of alignment changes.

Source: FHWA

Edge Line and Shoulder Rumbles

Alert inattentive drivers that they are

encroaching on the roadside.

Redirect vehicles from more severe obstacles. Provide sign or light posts that reduce occupant impact severity.

Source: FHWA

Delineators

Delineate the edges and alignment of a paved

or unpaved road. 

Provide an area for drivers to recover 

control without encountering a fixed 

object or steep slope.

Provide extra space between opposing 

directions of traffic.

Provide drivers stable surface for

recovery after leaving their lane.

Improve recovery at pavement edge 

without abrupt drop-offs.

Source: FHWA

High Friction Surface Treatment

Provide durable skid resistant properties at

high friction demand locations like curves.

Source: FHWA

Center Line Rumbles

Alert inattentive drivers that they are encroaching

into opposing lane.

Source: FHWA

FHWA-SA-21-063
#### HOLLY BROOK ACADEMY, INC., Appellant, v. RULE POOL COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 1886.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 28, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 24, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Arthur R. LAURELL, Appellant, v. Adela LAURELL, Appellee.

No. 70-528.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 13, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hardee County. Egantoff v. Herring, Fla.App. 1965, 177 So.2d 260.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[104th Congress Public Law 128]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ128.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 1198]]

Public Law 104-128
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To eliminate the Board of Tea Experts <<NOTE: Apr. 9, 1996 -  [H.R. 
         2969]>>  by repealing the Tea Importation Act of 1897.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Federal Tea 
Tasters Repeal Act of 1996.>> 

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 21 USC 41 note.>>  SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Tea Tasters Repeal Act of 
1996''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF TEA IMPORTATION ACT OF 1897.

    The Tea Importation Act (21 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) is repealed.

SEC. 3. <<NOTE: 21 USC 41 note.>>  EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act.

    Approved April 9, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2969 (S. 1518):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-467, Pt. 1 (Comm. on Ways and Means) and Pt. 2 
(Comm. on Commerce).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):
            Feb. 1, S. 1518 considered and passed Senate.
            Mar. 21, H.R. 2969 considered and passed House.
            Mar. 25, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  54,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,717
<INVENTORY>                                    52,147
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              115,599
<PP&E>                                         23,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                  9,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                137,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          43,665
<BONDS>                                        38,838
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           65
<OTHER-SE>                                     49,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  137,431
<SALES>                                       206,558
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              206,558
<CGS>                                         169,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 169,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  168
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,556
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,889
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,608
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,281
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,281
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .35



</TABLE>