alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p120558.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0558

Focus Ready Draft 1/3/2013

ENGINEER: Austin \ JAS

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1
p120558.eng

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (12/21/2012):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Ecotox Related Cases: 

Migration to groundwater: negl-mod

PBT rating: P3B3T1 P Rating: 1-3 // B Rating: 1-3

Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 170 ppb.)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3C

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: Yes (2 criteria met)

1) # of workers exposed: 126 >1000? No

2) >100 workers with >10 mg/day inhalation exposure: Yes

Page 2
p120558.eng

3) (a) >100 workers w/1-10 mg/day inh. exp. & >100

days/yr: No

 (b) Routine Dermal Cont: >250 workers & >100 days/yr:

Yes

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0558

 

 

 

 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

 

Page 3
p120558.eng

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0558

Page 4
p120558.eng

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Page 5
p120558.eng

 

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0558

 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Page 6
p120558.eng

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        (10,191)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,531
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    108,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               535,093
<PP&E>                                         743,340
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,618,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          224,212
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,602
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,399,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,618,792
<SALES>                                        872,116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               872,116
<CGS>                                          225,671
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  449,063
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               537,443
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,646
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (211,062)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : NO. 4:07-CR-0422-02

:

v. : (Judge Conner)

:

MARY ANN BERRETTINI, :

Defendant :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 15th day of January, 2010, upon consideration of the pro se

status of defendant Mary Ann Berrettini, and upon review of the docket in this

matter, the court deems it appropriate to appoint G. Scott Gardner, Esquire, to act

as standby counsel for defendant. See United States v. Bertoli, 994 F.2d 1002, 1017

(3d Cir. 1993) (stating that “standby counsel should always be appointed in cases

expected to be long or complicated or in which there are multiple defendants” and

finding that the court possesses the inherent power to appoint standby counsel

even for non-indigent defendants who object to the appointment). 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that G. Scott Gardner, Esquire, 2117

West Fourth Street, Williamsport, Pennsylvania; (570)322-7653, is hereby

APPOINTED as standby counsel for defendant Mary Ann Berrettini, effective

Monday, January 11, 2010. 

S/Christopher C. Conner

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge

Case 4:07-cr-00422-CCC Document 282 Filed 01/15/10 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2014

d0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2014

148181

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148181

COA: 316043

Grand Traverse CC:

DERRICK ANTONIO DAVIS, 09

- 010846

- FH

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 3, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and i t is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51096-51097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25800]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-730-000]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

September 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 8, 1997, NorAm Gas Transmission 
Company (NGT), 1600 Smith Street, Houston, Texas 77002, filed in Docket 
No. CP97-730-000, a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.211 of 
the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 
and 157.211) for authorization to construct and operate a tap in Hughes 
County, Oklahoma to serve ARKLA, a division of NorAM Energy Corp. 
(ARKLA), under its blanket certificate issued in Docket Nos. CP82-384-
000 and CP82-384-001, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, 
all as more fully set forth in the request which is on file with the

[[Page 51097]]

Commission and open to public inspection.
    Specifically, NGT proposes to construct and operate a 2-inch 
delivery tap and first-cut regulator to serve ARKLA. NGT says the tap 
will be installed on its Line 2-AD in Section 36, Township 5 North, 
Range 9 East, Hughes County, Oklahoma. NGT indicates that ARKLA will 
install the domestic meter setting. NGT relates that the estimated 
volumes to be delivered to this tap are approximately 160 MMBtu 
annually and 1 MMBtu on a peak day. NGT states that the tap and first-
cut regulator are to be constructed at an estimated cost of $2,600.00 
and that ARKLA will reimburse NGT the cost of construction.
    NGT states that it will transport gas to ARKLA and provide service 
under its tariff; that the volumes delivered are within ARKLA's 
certificated entitlement; and that NGT's tariff does not prohibit the 
addition of new delivery points. NGT says it has sufficient capacity to 
accomplish the deliveries without detriment or disadvantage to its 
other customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25800 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5470]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments; 
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Implementation 
to the Equal Access to Justice Act

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA 
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information 
collection. The information is needed to determine an applicant's 
eligibility for an award of attorney's fees and other expenses under 
the Equal Access to Justice Act.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by May 9, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Scott on (202) 267-9895, or by 
e-mail at: Carla.Scott@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0539.
    Title: Implementation to the Equal Access to Justice Act.
    Form Numbers: There are no FAA forms associated with this 
collection.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The Equal Access to Justice Act provides for the award 
of attorney fees and other expenses to eligible individuals and 
entities who are prevailing parties in administrative proceedings 
before government agencies. Certain information must be obtained from 
the applicant in order to determine such applicant's eligibility for 
the EAJA award.
    Respondents: Approximately 17 applicants.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 40 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 680 hours.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Carla 
Scott, Room 712, Federal Aviation Administration, IT Enterprises 
Business Services Division, AES-200, 800 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20591.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of 
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the 
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the 
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d) 
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of 
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include 
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information 
collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 3, 2011.
Carla Scott,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business 
Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2011-5470 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
256 La. 323

#### Jeff Frank WHITE, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana et al.

No. 50672.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 19, 1970.

In re: Jeff Frank White, Jr. applying for writ of mandamus.

Application denied. In view of the return of the judge and attached letter showing that the detainer for relator has been released, the complaint is now moot.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20972 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. WALDIR V. PEDROZA, also known as Juan Carlos Pineiro, also known as John Doe, Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. WALDIR PEDROZA-VICTORIA, also known as Charlie, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-97-CR-236-1

- - - - - - - - - - July 18, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Counsel for Waldir Pedroza-Victoria (Pedroza), the Federal Public Defender, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).No. 00-20972 - 2 - Pedroza has received copies of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See id. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and Pedroza’s APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52092-52093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26397]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Advisory Committee Meeting Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC)

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
committee meeting:
    Name of Committee: Distance Learning/Training Technology 
Subcommittee of the Army Education Advisory Committee.
    Date: 12-14 November 1997.
    Place: Virginia Air and Space Center, 600 Settlers Landing Road, 
Hampton, Virginia 23669-4033.
    Time: 1300-1700 on 12 November 1997; 0800-1700 on 13 November 1997; 
and 0830-1130 on 14 November 1997.
    Proposed Agenda: Review and discussion of the status of Army 
Distance Learning.
    Purpose of the Meeting: The members will advise the Assistant 
Deputy Chief of Staff (ADCST), HQ Training and Doctrine Command 
(TRADOC), on matters pertaining to education and training technologies 
to be used for Army Distance Learning.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: All communications regarding this 
advisory committee should be addressed to Dr. Mimi Stout, at Commander, 
Headquarters TRADOC, Attn: ATTG-CF (Dr. Mimi Stout), Fort Monroe, VA 
23651-5000; telephone number (757) 728-5531.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meeting of the advisory committee is open to 
the public. Because of restricted meeting space, attendance will be 
limited to those persons who have notified the Advisory Committee 
Management Office in writing at least five days prior to the meeting of 
their intention to attend any of the 12-14 November 1997 sessions.
    Any members of the public may file a written statement with the 
committee before, during, or after the meeting. To the extent that time 
permits, the committee chairman may allow public

[[Page 52093]]

presentations of oral statements at the meeting.
Robert E. Seger,
Senior Executive Service Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff for Training.
[FR Doc. 97-26397 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
PUBLIC LAW 104–177—AUG. 6, 1996 110 STAT. 1563

Public Law 104–177

104th Congress

An Act

To amend title 18 of the United States Code to allow members of employee associations to represent their views before the United States Government.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Representation

Improvement Act of 1996’’.

SEC. 2. REPRESENTATION BY FEDERAL OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES.

(a) EXTENSION OF EXEMPTION TO PROHIBITION.—Subsection (d)

of section 205 of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read

as follows:

‘‘(d)(1) Nothing in subsection (a) or (b) prevents an officer

or employee, if not inconsistent with the faithful performance of

that officer’s or employee’s duties, from acting without compensation

as agent or attorney for, or otherwise representing—

‘‘(A) any person who is the subject of disciplinary, loyalty,

or other personnel administration proceedings in connection

with those proceedings; or

‘‘(B) except as provided in paragraph (2), any cooperative,

voluntary, professional, recreational, or similar organization

or group not established or operated for profit, if a majority

of the organization’s or groups’s members are current officers

or employees of the United States or of the District of Columbia,

or their spouses or dependent children.

‘‘(2) Paragraph (1)(B) does not apply with respect to a covered

matter that—

‘‘(A) is a claim under subsection (a)(1) or (b)(1);

‘‘(B) is a judicial or administrative proceeding where the

organization or group is a party; or

‘‘(C) involves a grant, contract, or other agreement (including a request for any such grant, contract, or agreement) providing for the disbursement of Federal funds to the organization

or group.’’.

(b) APPLICATION TO LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS.—Section

205 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at

the end the following:

‘‘(i) Nothing in this section prevents an employee from acting

pursuant to—

‘‘(1) chapter 71 of title 5;

‘‘(2) section 1004 or chapter 12 of title 39;

‘‘(3) section 3 of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of

1933 (16 U.S.C. 831b);

18 USC 201 note.

Federal

Employee

Representation

Improvement Act

of 1996.

Aug. 6, 1996

[H.R. 782]
110 STAT. 1564 PUBLIC LAW 104–177—AUG. 6, 1996

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 782:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–230 (Comm. on the Judiciary).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 141 (1995): Oct. 24, considered and passed House.

Vol. 142 (1996): July 25, considered and passed Senate, amended.

Aug. 1, House concurred in Senate amendment.

‘‘(4) chapter 10 of title I of the Foreign Service Act of

1980 (22 U.S.C. 4104 et seq.); or

‘‘(5) any provision of any other Federal or District of Columbia law that authorizes labor-management relations between

an agency or instrumentality of the United States or the District of Columbia and any labor organization that represents

its employees.’’.

Approved August 6, 1996.
No. 00-6983.

#### Trice *v.*Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
SERVED OCTOBER 1, 2010 

1-PARTMENTOF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION r -^NSPOR iATiON 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS "•([ f OPERATIONS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

U A •& 35 •vn'n •'•"•? 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ORIGINAL PRODUCTIONS, LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10AL0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FAANo. FAA-2010-0621 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

This matter will not be heard prior to January 1, 2011. 

WHEREFORE, Paragraphs #2 and #3 of the Procedural Order are amended as 

follows': 

... On or before December 31, 2010, the parties shall conclude all discovery 

including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to 

production requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a 

discovery dispute they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution 

in a timely manner... 

...NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the parties shall be prepared to present this case 

at a hearing on or after January 1, 2011^, sujyect to tl^e availability of courtroom 

facilities... ^"^^ * " ^ ^ 

lichard C. (poodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

? ' The Administrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes of the decisions, the Rules of Practice, as 

\ well as other materials relating to civil penalty cases, are available on the internet at: 

i htipy'/M'M'MKfaa.gov/ahout/office nrg/headquartersoffices/agc/pol adjudicalioiv'agc^OO/civil j:enalt}'/; see 

i also: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gOv/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Titlel4/14tab_02.tpl. In 

\ addition, Thomson Reuters/West Publishing publishes Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, the decisions 

i are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw 9FTRAN-FAA database). For additional 

i information, see the Web site. 

:| 14 C.F.R. § 13.221 states: "The administrative law judge shall give each party at least 60 days notice of 

I the date, time and location of the hearing." 
FAA Docket No^ CPl 0AL0O02 

(Civil Penalty A^on) 

i^ SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-43 0 

Wilbur Wright Building-lSuite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Charles M. Finkel, Respondent's Counsel 

M^ana, Cathcart & McCarthy * 

1801 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 600 

(.05 Angeles, CA 90067 

tEL: 310-553-6630 

FAX: ^0407-2295 

Lierre Green, Complainant's Counsel 

pfifice of |Sgional Counsel 

Westem-^Mc Region, AWP-7.6 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. ^otmooi 

Los Angeles, CA 92007 

tEL: 310-725-7117 

FAX: 316^725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Pffieeof gearings, M-20 '^ 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S .E. 

jEast Building Ground Floor 

Room Ei 2-320 

IVashington, DC 20590 

tEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 2aa3<^-7536 

•im§'^-^ 

I Swvice wisby U.S. Mail. For service in persoii or by eiqjedited couii««|i5fe the fpllpw^j 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wri]glir6iiilding—^tiile 2' 

t)C 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGfc-430.