alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.41

 
                   AMENDED AND RESTATED WORKING-CAPITAL NOTE
                   -----------------------------------------


$5,000,000                                                     February 22, 1999


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, MATRIX FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION, an Arizona
corporation ("Borrower"), promises to pay to the order of BANK ONE, TEXAS, N.A.
("Lender") that portion of the principal amount of $5,000,000 that may from time
to time be disbursed and outstanding under this note together with interest.

     This note is a "Working-Capital Note" under the Amended and Restated Loan
Agreement (as renewed, extended, amended, or restated, the "Loan Agreement")
dated as of January 31, 1997, between Borrower, Lender, certain other Lenders,
and Bank One, Texas, N.A., as Agent for Lenders.  All of the defined terms in
the Loan Agreement have the same meanings when used -- unless otherwise defined
-- in this note.

     This note incorporates by reference the principal and interest payment
terms in the Loan Agreement for this note, including, without limitation, the
final maturity, which is the Warehouse-Actual-Termination Date.  Principal and
interest are payable to the holder of this note through Agent at either (a) its
offices at 1717 Main Street, Dallas, Texas 75201, or (b) at any other address so
designated by Agent in written notice to Borrower.

     This note incorporates by reference all other provisions in the Loan
Agreement applicable to this note -- such as provisions for disbursements of
principal, applicable-interest rates before and after Default, voluntary and
mandatory prepayments, acceleration of maturity, exercise of Rights, payment of
attorneys' fees, court costs, and other costs of collection, certain waivers by
Borrower and other obligors, assurances and security, choice of Texas and United
States federal Law, usury savings, and other matters applicable to Loan
Documents under the Loan Agreement.

     This note is an amendment, restatement, renewal, extension, modification
of, consolidation of, and substitution for, the existing Receivables Notes (as
the same may have been amended and replaced to the date hereof, the "Former
Notes"), which Former Notes were executed and delivered pursuant to the  Loan
Agreement.


                              MATRIX FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION, as
                              Borrower


                              By                 /s/
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                    George R. Bender, President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6422

GEORGE DREHER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; HENRY MCMASTER,

Attorney General; WILLIAM WHITE, Warden,

Respondents -Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (6:06-cv-01298-PMD)

Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: July 31, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Dreher, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Derrick K.

McFarland, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

George Dreher seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims

by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Dreher has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: Abu Dhabi Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rome San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Associated offices: Budapest Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com
\\DC - 040601/000003 - 5371676 v2 Hogan Lovells US LLP Columbia Square 555 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004 T +1 202 637 5600 F +1 202 637 5910 www.hoganlovells.com

January 31, 2014 Marc L. Warren Acting Chief Counsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591
Re: Joint Petition of Republic Airline Inc., Shuttle America Corporation and Chautauqua Airlines, Inc. regarding FAA Exemption No. 7370G (FAA Docket No. FAA-2002-13734)

Dear Mr. Warren:
The Joint Response of Southwest Airlines and JetBlue Airways, filed January 30, 2014, adds nothing new that requires a response. The Joint Petitioners urge the FAA to act promptly on the Joint Petition to use Slot 1497 pursuant to Exemption No. 7370G, so that the important needs of Madison for nonstop DCA service can continue to be
met.

Respectfully submitted,

Robert E. Cohn Patrick R. Rizzi Hogan Lovells US LLP Counsel for Republic Airline Inc., Shuttle America Corporation, and Chautauqua Airlines, Inc. cc: Bryan Bedford Ethan Blank Robert Kneisley, Southwest Jonathan Hill, JetBlue
#### FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FORT LAUDERDALE, Appellant, v. OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE CO., Southeastern Home Mortgage Co., Appellees.

No. 69-606.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 7, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-146426, No. 333-115027, No. 333-129746, No. 333-98738, No. 333-39407, No. 333-38730 and No. 333-67050) pertaining to the Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, the Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan, the Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-53772) pertaining to the Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-141849, No. 333-37941, No. 333-61477, No. 333-79939, No. 333-95671 and No. 333-58206) of Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the related Prospectus;

of our reports dated March 13, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., included in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Hartford, Connecticut
March 13, 2008

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26292]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (97-143)]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assinged to the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United 
States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.

DATES: October 3, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Office of Patent Counsel, Langley Research Center, Mail Stop 212, 
Hampton, VA 23681-0001; telephone (757) 864-9260.
    NASA Case No. LAR-15547-1: An Improved Substrate Material for 
Holographic Emulsions Utilizing Fluorinated Polyimide Film.
    NASA Case No. LAR-14997-3: Optical Flameout Detector (FWC of--2).
    NASA Case No. LAR-15539-1: Advanced Layered Composite Polylaminate 
Electro-Active Actuator.
    NASA Case No. LAR-15411-2-CU: Process and Apparatus for Applying 
Powder Particles to a Filamentary Material (FWC of--1).
    NASA Case No. LAR-15062-2: Multi-Channel Electronically Scanned 
Cryogenic Pressure Sensor (FWC of--1).
    NASA Case No. LAR-15289-2: 3-Dimensional Object Tracking System and 
Method Employing Plural Sensors/Processors for Performing Parallel 
Processing (FWC of--1).

    Dated: September 26, 1997.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-26292 Filed 10-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 922]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 121 Albany, NY, Area and Approval 
for Manufacturing Authority (Eyeglass Frames)

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, an application from the Capital District Regional Planning 
Commission, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 121, Albany, New York, area, 
for authority to expand FTZ 121 to include an additional site in the 
Albany, New York, area, and for authority on behalf of Liberty Optical 
Manufacturing Company to manufacture eyeglass frames under FTZ 
procedures within FTZ 121, was filed by the Board on September 3, 1996 
(FTZ Docket 68-96, 61 FR 48665, 9/16/96);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in Federal 
Register and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act 
and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 121 and for authority to manufacture 
eyeglass frames under FTZ procedures is approved, subject to the Act 
and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and subject to a 
condition limiting the manufacturing authority to an initial five-year 
period, subject to extension upon review.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of September 1997.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26315 Filed 10-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 32
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection  with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Elite Information Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) for the three month period ended February 28, 2010 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the “Report”),  I, Li Kin Shing, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:  April 14, 2010
By
/s/ Li Kin ShingLi Kin ShingPresident, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
#### Richard D. CAPSHAW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1297.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 30, 1978.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Dane E. DiSano, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Richard D. Capshaw appeals the summary denial of his motion to vacate sentence for the crime of robbery. He contends that the record does not conclusively show that he is entitled to no relief.

We agree with appellant and reverse.

In his motion appellant alleged ineffective assistance of counsel because his appointed attorney failed to inform him that he may have lacked mens rea which could be asserted as a defense, and did not inform *430the court that appellant was too sedated to intelligently plead guilty to the charge.

The trial judge summarily denied the motion on the basis of a transcript of the plea hearing and the medical records compiled upon appellant while he was hospitalized in the psychiatric wing of Polk General Hospital following a suicide attempt.

The record reveals that appellant’s plea of guilty was taken two days after his discharge from the hospital, and that several different types of tranquilizing drugs were administered to him while he was hospitalized. Valium, Tofranil, Artane and Mellaril were prescribed for administration to appellant after his discharge.

At the plea hearing appellant’s drugged condition was not brought to the attention of the trial judge nor did the judge inquire into appellant’s sobriety, although at one point appellant himself asked if his tranquilizers were to be continued.

We find that the record does not conclusively refute appellant’s allegations. An evidentiary hearing is therefore required to determine the bearing of appellant’s condition on his ability to make a knowing, intelligent and voluntary decision to enter his plea, and the effectiveness of his counsel under the circumstances. *See Merritt v. State,*165 So.2d 245 (Fla.2d DCA 1964); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

Reversed for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

SCHEB, A. C. J., and OTT and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.
Notification of the Interim Final FIP – Signed by Lisa Jackson , Notification of the Interim Final FIP – Signed by Lisa Jackson ,EPA 

Administrator

40CFR Part CFR Part CFR Part49 – Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas 

Production Facilities , Production Facilities ,Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (Mandan,Hidatsa and Hidatsa and Hidatsa and 

Arikara Nations , Arikara Nations,or MHA Nation or MHA Nation or MHA Nation ),North Dakota North Dakota North Dakota . (as defined in § as defined in § as defined in § 49.152

Carl Daly Carl Daly to: david_long 08/02/2012 11:13 AM

Cc: Curtis_rice, elewis, Deirdre Rothery, Kate Fay, Sara Laumann

This message is digitally signed.

Mr. Long,

This email is to inform you that Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection 

Agency, has signed an interim final rule “Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas Federal Implementation Plan for Oil and Natural Gas 

Production Facilities , Production Facilities ,Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation Fort Berthold Indian Reservation (Mandan,Hidatsa and Arikara Nations Hidatsa and Arikara Nations Hidatsa and Arikara Nations ,or MHA 

Nation) Nation),North Dakota North Dakota North Dakota ,”(Fort Berthold Oil and Gas FIP)a federal rule that applies to oil and gas 

operations producing from the Bakken Pool on the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation in North Dakota . 

The FIP requires owners and operators of oil and natural gas production facilities to reduce emissions of 

volatile organic compounds emanating from well completions , recompletions, and production and storage 

operations. The agency proposed a Reservation-specific FIP concurrently with this interim final rule .

Please find, attached, a copy of the notification sent by certified mail to the primary contact for EOG 

Resources:

EOG_Actual Notice of FIP Letter 8-1-12.pdf

And a copy of the interim final rule:

Fort Berthold FIP NFR_8-1-12 (interim final rule) for ACTUAL NOTICE LETTERS.pdf

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me or Deirdre Rothery, Chief 

Air Permitting, Monitoring and Modeling Unit at rothery.deirdre@epa.gov or 303-312-6431.

Thank you,

Carl Daly, Director, Air Program

303-312-6416
### Geology and ground-water conditions in southern Nassau and southeastern Queens Counties, Long Island, N.Y.

By: N. M. PerlmutterJ. J. Geraghty

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1613A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Water-level and chloride-content data at outpost observation wells in southwestern Nassau County, Long Island, New York(1953)                                    

                                        Supplementary data on water levels and chloride concentrations at outpost observation wells in southern Nassau County, Long Island, New York(1954)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 21

                   Matrix Bancorp, Inc. (d/b/a Matrix Bancorp)

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

1.    Matrix  Capital  Bank - Organized  Pursuant to a Federal  Savings and Loan
      Charter

2.    Matrix  Tower  Holdings,  LLC  (d/b/a  Matrix  Tower  Holdings  and Matrix
      Financial Center) - Formed in Delaware

3.    MCNP-1 Corp. - Incorporated in New Mexico

4.    Matrix Financial  Services  Corporation  (d/b/a Matrix Home Loans,  Matrix
      Capital Mortgage and Matrix Capital  Mortgage  Corporation) - Incorporated
      in Arizona

5.    Matrix Insurance Services Corporation - Incorporated in Arizona

6.    The Vintage Group, Inc. - Incorporated in Texas

7.    Vintage Delaware Holdings, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware

8.    Sterling Trust Company - Incorporated in Texas

7.    MSCS Ventures, Inc. - Incorporated in Colorado

8.    Matrix Settlement & Clearance Services,  L.L.C. (d/b/a Matrix Settlement &
      Clearance Services) - 45% Owned and Organized in New York

9.    MSCS Financial Services,  LLC (100% owned by Matrix Settlement & Clearance
      Services, L.L.C.) - Formed in Delaware

10.   Matrix Advisory Services, L.L.C. (d/b/a Matrix Advisory Services) - Formed
      in Delaware

11.   Matrix Asset  Management  Corporation  (d/b/a Matrix Asset  Management and
      MTXC Realty) - Incorporated in Colorado

12.   Matrix Capital  Markets,  Inc.  (d/b/a Matrix  Capital  Markets and United
      Financial, Inc.) - Incorporated in Colorado

13.   First Matrix  Investment  Services  Corp.  (d/b/a First Matrix  Investment
      Services) - Incorporated in Texas

14.   First Matrix, LLC - Organized in Colorado

15.   Matrix Funding Corp. - Incorporated in Colorado

16.   Equi-mor Holdings, Inc. - Incorporated in Nevada

17.   ABS School  Services,  L.L.C.  (d/b/a ABS School  Services) - Organized in
      Arizona

18.   New Century Property Management Group, LLC - Organized in Arizona

19.   New Century Educational Management Services, LLC - Organized in Arizona

20.   Matrix Bancorp Capital Trust I - Organized Under Delaware Law

21.   Matrix Bancorp Capital Trust II - Organized Under Delaware Law

22.   Matrix Bancorp Capital Trust III- Organized Under Delaware Law

23.   Matrix Bancorp Capital Trust IV - Organized Under Delaware Law

24.   Matrix Bancorp Capital Trust V - Organized Under Delaware Law
#### NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, Garnishee-Appellant, v. O’Neal JOHNS, Garnishor-Appellee, and C. D. Braddock and Tommie Johns, Defendants-Appellees.

No. L-490.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 3, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 4, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.