alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, IndependentAuditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-98738, No. 333-39407, No.333-38730 and No. 333-67050) pertaining to the Vion Pharmaceuticals,Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, As Amended, in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-53772) pertaining to the VionPharmaceuticals, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and in theRegistration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-37941, No. 333-61477, No.333-79939, No. 333-95671 and No. 333-58206) of Vion Pharmaceuticals,Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated January 23,2004, except with respect to Note 12, as to which the date is March 12,2004, with respect to the financial statements of Vion Pharmaceuticals,Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2003.

|  | /s/ Ernst & YoungLLP |
|--|--------------------------|

Boston, MassachusettsMarch 24,2004

----
EXHIBIT 10.4(a)
   
                             AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                 TO THE
                  SITEL CORPORATION 1995 NON-EMPLOYEE
                      DIRECTORS STOCK OPTION PLAN

       As adopted by the Board of Directors on September 20, 1996

 1.   The section of the SITEL Corporation 1995 Non-Employee  Directors Stock
      Option Plan captioned "Effect of Change in Stock  Subject to the Plan" is 
      amended to state in its entirety as follows:

              Effect of Change in Stock Subject to the Plan
              ______________________________________________

      9.1   Change in Stock.  If there is any change in the outstanding  
shares of Stock by reason of a stock dividend or distribution, stock split-
up, recapitalization, or combination or exchange of shares, or by reason of any
merger, consolidation, spin-off, or other corporate reorganization in which the
Company is the surviving corporation, then the number of shares of Stock 
available for issuance under the Plan both in the aggregate and with respect to
each outstanding Option, and the Option Exercise Price per share under 
outstanding Options, shall be equitably adjusted by the Committee, whose
determination shall be final, binding, and conclusive.  In the event of (i) a  
dissolution or liquidation of the Corporation, (ii) merger or consolidation of
the Corporation with another corporation or other entity pursuant to which the 
Corporation is not the surviving entity, (iii) sale or lease of all or 
substantially all the business assets of the Corporation, or (iv) the sale of  
more than 80% of the outstanding Common Stock of the Corporation  in a single 
transaction or series of related transactions involving the same acquiring 
entity or person, unless (A) the surviving or acquiring  corporation or entity 
or an affiliated corporation or entity assumes the outstanding options (which 
assumption may take the form of replacement of the outstanding options with
substantially equivalent options from the surviving or acquiring or affiliated 
corporation or entity, and with the determination as to whether the outstanding 
options have been assumed and whether the assumption involved "substantially 
equivalent" options being determined by the Committee within its complete 
discretion) then (B) each outstanding Option shall expire as of the effective 
date of such transaction, provided that the Committee shall give at least 
fifteen (15) days prior written notice of such even to any Participants having 
outstanding Options who shall then have the right to exercise his or her 
outstanding Options, in whole or in part, but only to the extent they are then 
exercisable under the terms of the Plan, prior to the effective date of such  
transaction, subject to earlier expiration of such Options pursuant to the 
applicable Option Agreement.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/28 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 28 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, James A. Prestiano, the President and sole officer of Regal Acquisitions,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002, to which this certification accompanies (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(b) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 19, 2002


                                              /s/ James A. Prestiano
                                              ------------------------------
                                              James A. Prestiano, President
#### Elvie FORTENBERRY v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 45970.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 2, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 1970.

Garland D. Upton, Columbia, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by John M. Kinard, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully read the record in this case together with the briefs. Two assignments of error were urged, the first being that the court failed to sustain appellant’s motion to quash the indictment for the reasons urged therein. The appellant wholly failed to request the court to consider the motion to quash the indictment, which if the court had considered would have been found to be without merit.

The second error urged is that the trial court erred in overruling defendant’s motion to exclude and strike prosecution’s questions and responses thereto with reference to what witness James Tyson stated to him in the witness room prior to his testifying and in not declaring a mistrial. This witness was summoned by both the state and the appellant and both had equal right to interview this witness prior to his testifying. The appellant put this witness on the stand. This error is without merit also and therefore the judgment of the Circuit Court of Marion County is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ETHRIDGE, C. J., GILLESPIE, P. J., and RODGERS, JONES, BRADY and SMITH, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Eric J. Kufel, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form10-K of Poore Brothers, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Reporton Form 10-K does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report onForm 10-K, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Securities and Exchange Commission Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, asamended) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision,  to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: March 23, 2004

 
| /s/ Eric J.  Kufel                     |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Eric J.  Kufel                         |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 

GERARD JACKSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

DIRECT BUILDING SUPPLIES LLC, 

 Defendant. 

 No. 4:23-CV-01569 

 (Chief Judge Brann) 

 

ORDER 

JANUARY 17, 2024 

 In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 22) is DENIED. 

2. Defendant’s answer to the complaint is due no later than fourteen (14) 

days from the date of this Order. 

 BY THE COURT: 

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

 Matthew W. Brann 

 Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:23-cv-01569-MWB Document 27 Filed 01/17/24 Page 1 of 1
### Magnitude and frequency of floods in the United States: Part 14. Pacific slope basins in Oregon and lower Columbia River basin

By: Harry HulsingN. A. Kallio

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1689

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26100]



[[Page 51673]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Division of Research Grants; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Division of Research Grants Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review individual grant applications.
    Name of SEP: Chemistry and Related Sciences.
    Date: October 22, 1997.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Place: Hotel Sofitel, Washington, DC.
    Contact Person: Dr. Chhandra Ganguly, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5156, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1739.

    Name of SEP: Chemistry and Related Sciences.
    Date: November 7, 1997.
    Time: 2:00 p.m.
    Place: NIH, Rockledge 2, Room 5156, Telephone Conference.
    Contact Person:  Dr. Chhandra, Scientific Review Administrator, 
6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5156, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 
435-1739.

    Name of SEP: Multidisciplinary Sciences.
    Date: November 7, 1997.
    Time: 8:30 a.m.
    Place: Hyatt Regency, Bethesda, MD.
    Contact Person: Dr. Mohindar Poonian, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4198, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1218.

    Name of SEP: Biological and Physiological Sciences.
    Date: November 16-17, 1997.
    Time: 7:00 p.m.
    Place: Georgetown Holiday Inn, Washington, DC.
    Contact Person: Dr. Syed Quardri, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4132, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1211.

    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 25, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-26100 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### James C. BRACKNELL et al., Petitioners, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Industrial Relations Commission and Northwest Airlines, Inc., Respondents.

No. 70-1169.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 1, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Public Health Service


National Institutes of Health; Notice of Listing of Members of 
the National Institutes of Health's Senior Executive Service 
Performance Review Board (PRB)

    The National Institutes of Health (NIH) announces the persons who 
will serve on the National Institutes of Health's Senior Executive 
Service Performance Review Board. This action is being taken in 
accordance with Title 5, U.S.C., Section 4314 (c)(4), which requires 
that members of performance review boards be appointed in a manner to 
ensure consistency, stability and objectivity in performance 
appraisals, and requires that notice of the appointment of an 
individual to serve as a member be published in the Federal Register.
    The following persons will serve on the NIH Performance Review 
Board, which oversees the evaluation of performance appraisals of NIH 
Senior Executive Service (SES) members:

Ruth L. Kirschstein, M.D., Chairperson
Wendy Baldwin, Ph.D.
Henning Birkedal-Hansen, D.D.S., Ph.D.
Noami Churchill, Esq.
William T. Fitzsimmons
Michael M. Gottesman, M.D.
Richard J. Hodes, M.D.
Anthony L. Itteilag
Marvin Kalt, Ph.D.
Stephen I. Katz, M.D., Ph.D,
Thomas J. Kindt, Ph.D.
Sheila E. Merritt
W. Sue Shafer, Ph.D.

    For further information about the NIH Performance Review Board, 
contact the Office of Human Resource Management, Division of Senior 
Systems, National Institutes of Health, Building 31/B3C12, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892, telephone (301) 496-1443 (not a toll-free number).

    Dated: September 24, 1997
Ruth L. Kirchstein,
Deputy Director, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-26170 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
RE: owosso reports 

Gary Wood to: Christopher Lambesis 

Cc: "'Terri Zick'" 

04/13/2010 08:24 AM 

From: 

To: 

Cc: 

"Gary Wood" <woodgl@trimatrixiabs.com> 

Christopher Lambesis/R5/USEPA/US@EPA 

"'Terri Zickm <tzick@cticompanies.com> 

Please respond to <woodgl©trimatrixlabs .com> 

Chris, 

We did not dry weight correct this sludge data so it is reported on an as 

received basis. We did not test these samples for percent solids. 

Given that we analyzed for NMP as a TIC using method 8270C, by definition 

the reported concentrations are estimates. 

Because we analyzed the raw product along with the sample, we had a very 

good comparison to work from so we are confident in our identification of 

NMP in these samples, although the reported values or concentrations should 

be viewed as estimates. 

Gary Wood 

Senior Project Chemist 

TriMatrix Laboratories, Inc. 

Corporate / Laboratory 

5560 Corporate Exchange Court SE 

Grand Rapids, Michigan 49512 

woodgl@trimatrixlabs.com 

Main: 616.975.4500 

Direct: 616.940.4206 

Fax: 616.942.7463 

www.trimatrixlabs.com 

The information contained in, or files attached to, this email is intended 

only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed, and 

others who have been specifically authorized to receive it. This email and 

its attachments may contain information that is privileged, confidential, 

and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this 

message is not the intended recipient nor the employee or agent responsible 

for delivery to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 

disclosure,woodgl@trimatrixlabs.comuse of the contents of this email and 

its attachments without the consent of TriMatrix Laboratories, Inc. is 

strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. 

Original Message 

From: Lambesis.Christopher@epamail.epa.gov 

(mailto:Lambesis.Christopher@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 6:55 PM 

To: woowoodgl@trimatrixlabs.com 

Subject: RE: owosso reports 

Gary, 

Can you let me Zick'"if the latest set of Owosso samples analyzed 

woodgl@trimatrixlabsd in dry or "as-received" weight basis. Was percent solids 

performed? Thanks. 

-Chris 
Christopher Lambesis 

Environmental Scientist 

U.S EPA Region 5 

Land and Chemicals Division 

(312) 886-3583
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 27, 2010

0920 

# Order

September 27, 2010

141329

STEVEN Z. COHEN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141329 COA: 290569 Oakland CC: 1995-502501-PH DAVID NERENBERG, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 8, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 21

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF LECROY CORPORATION



                             NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                JURISDICTION
                             ------------------                  ORGANIZED
                                                               ------------
        LeCroy Corporation *..................................   Delaware
        LeCroy Lightspeed Corporation.........................   Delaware
        LeCroy, S.A.R.L. .....................................   France
        LeCroy, GmbH .........................................   Germany
        LeCroy, Hong Kong, Ltd. ..............................   Hong Kong
        LeCroy, S.R.L. .......................................   Italy
        LeCroy Japan Corporation..............................   Japan
        LeCroy, Pte. Ltd. ....................................   Singapore
        LeCroy Korea, Ltd. ...................................   South Korea
        LeCroy AB.............................................   Sweden
        LeCroy, S.A. .........................................   Switzerland
        LeCroy, Ltd. .........................................   United Kingdom


       * Parent
```

[104th Congress Public Law 81]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ81.104]

[[Page 109 STAT. 795]]

Public Law 104-81
104th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
Providing for the reappointment of Homer Alfred Neal as a citizen regent 
of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. <<NOTE: Dec. 28, 
                        1995 -  [H.J. Res. 69]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 
in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the 
expiration of the term of Homer Alfred Neal of Michigan on December 6, 
1995, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent for a term of six 
years, effective December 7, 1995.

    Approved December 28, 1995.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 69:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):
            Nov. 7, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 20, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his/her capacity as an officer of
Atlantic Coast Airlines Holdings, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| |  | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 
| |  | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
the Company.                                                   

By:/s/ Kerry B. Skeen




Name: Kerry B. Skeen
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 17, 2004


By:/s/ Richard J. Surratt




Name: Richard J. Surratt
Title: Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
Date: February 17, 2004