alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24
                                                 POWER OF ATTORNEY

        The undersigned officer and/or director of EMERGING ALPHA CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"),  hereby constitutes and appoints Jerry
W.  Jarrell  and  D.B.H.  Chaffe  III,  and each of  them,  with  full  power of
substitution and resubstitution,  as attorney to sign for the undersigned in any
and all capacities the  Corporation's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended March 31, 1997 and any and all amendments thereto, with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission and with full power and authority to do and perform any and
all  acts  and  things  whatsoever  required  and  necessary  to be  done in the
premises,  as fully to all intents and purposes as the  undersigned  could do if
personally  present.  The undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said
attorney-in-fact  and  agent,  or any  of his  substitute  or  substitutes,  may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof and incorporate such changes as
any of the said attorneys-in-fact deems appropriate.


------------------------------
Burt H. Keenan

May 23, 1997
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Hooker Furniture Corporation (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, E. Larry Ryder, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: October 19, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ E. Larry Ryder     
|                       |  |     |  | E. Larry Ryder         
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Rayfield MOORE, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-272.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 10, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2337]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Open Meeting for Representatives of Health Professional, 
Consumer, and Patient Advocacy Organizations

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a public 
meeting with representatives of health professional, consumer, and 
patient advocacy organizations. The meeting will be chaired by Sharon 
Smith Holston, Deputy Commissioner for External Affairs. The topic will 
be FDA's final regulation restricting the sale and distribution of 
cigarettes and smokeless tobacco to protect children and adolescents. 
The purpose of this meeting is to provide an opportunity for 
representatives of health professional, consumer, and patient advocacy 
groups, and other interested persons to be briefed by senior FDA staff 
and to provide an opportunity for informal discussion regarding FDA's 
final regulation governing access to and promotion of cigarettes and 
smokeless tobacco to protect children and adolescents.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, February 10, 1997, from 9 
a.m. to 12 m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Hyatt Regency Hotel, One 
Bethesda Metro Center, Bethesda, MD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Betty B. Palsgrove, Office of Health 
Affairs (HFY-40), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-1652.
    There is no registration fee for this meeting, however, space is 
limited. Interested persons will be registered in the order in which 
calls are received. Please call the contact person listed above to 
register. Registrations also may be transmitted by FAX at 1-800-344-
3332 or 301-443-2446. Please include the name and title of the person 
attending and the name of the organization being represented.

    Dated: January 24, 1997.
William B. Schultz,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 97-2337 Filed 1-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
```
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 13, 2015

No. 04-14-00762-CR

Jason Robert VANWINKLE,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-14-0000041

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

Appellant’s brief is due April 20, 2015.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### MIAMI CARIBE INVESTMENTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. MUJICA FASHIONS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-613.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 19, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sandra J. Andre, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date: July 1, 2008



                                            By: /s/ SANDRA J. ANDRE
                                                ___________________________
                                                    Sandra J. Andre
                                                    President and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3066 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to increase the knowledge 

and skills of principals and school leaders regarding early childhood education. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 18, 2023 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Mr. ROMNEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to increase 

the knowledge and skills of principals and school leaders 

regarding early childhood education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Creating Early Child5 hood Leaders Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. 

7 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) Since principals and school leaders have the 

9 second largest in-school impact on student achieveVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:17 Oct 20, 2023 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3066.IS S3066

khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3066 IS

1 ment (after teachers), a principal or school leader’s 

2 knowledge has a substantial impact on the teachers 

3 and students under the principal or school leader’s 

4 supervision. 

5 (2) Principals and school leaders are increas6 ingly being asked to supervise teachers and children 

7 in pre-kindergarten programs, yet school leaders 

8 often do not have training in early childhood edu9 cation. 

10 (3) Given the critical development that occurs 

11 in a child’s early life and the impacts of this develop12 mental period on later life outcomes, understanding 

13 the standards of early childhood education is par14 ticularly important. 

15 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to ensure 

16 that principals and school leaders are able to effectively 

17 support teachers in providing pre-kindergarten students 

18 with developmentally appropriate instruction. 

19 SEC. 3. SCHOOL LEADER TRAINING REGARDING EARLY 

20 CHILDHOOD EDUCATION. 

21 Section 202(f)(1)(B) of the Higher Education Act of 

22 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1022a(f)(1)(B)) is amended— 

23 (1) by striking clause (v) and inserting the fol24 lowing: 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3066 IS

1 ‘‘(v) engage and involve parents, com2 munity members, the local educational 

3 agency, businesses, providers of early child4 hood education programs, and other com5 munity leaders, to leverage additional re6 sources to improve student academic 

7 achievement;’’; 

8 (2) in clause (vi), by striking the period at the 

9 end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(vii) understand child development, 

12 social and emotional development, develop13 mentally appropriate behavioral interven14 tions and supports, and effective instruc15 tional leadership skills for children from 

16 birth through age 8, in order to effectively 

17 manage and support developmentally ap18 propriate early childhood education pro19 grams.’’. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
258 La. 347

#### Henry GIBSON et al. v. Emmett JOHNSON.

No. 51268.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 14, 1971.

In re: Henry Gibson and Carrie Gibson Thomas applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 244 So.2d 713.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we cannot say the judgment is incorrect.
#### Vernon Franklin HUDSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-944.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 16, 1971.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Lewis Kimler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Bruce L. Scheiner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rosenbaum v. United States, 5 Cir.1969, 413 F.2d 298.
#### Obbie Lee HOLLIMON and Cleveland Williams, Petitioners, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40418.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 14, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 239 So.2d 514.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
```

[105th Congress Private Law 4]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl4.105]

Private Law 105-4
105th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  For the relief of John Andre Chalot. <<NOTE:  Nov. 21, 1997 -  [H.R. 
                                2732]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF EFFECTIVE DATE OF NATURALIZATION OF JOHN 
            ANDRE CHALOT.

    Notwithstanding title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 
any predecessor provisions to such title, or any other provision of law 
relating to naturalization, for purposes of determining the eligibility 
of John Andre Chalot for relief under the Agreement Between the 
Government of the United States and the Government of the Federal 
Republic of Germany Concerning Final Benefits to Certain United States 
Nationals Who Were Victims of National Socialist Measures of 
Persecution, signed at Bonn on September 19, 1995, John Andre Chalot is 
deemed to be a naturalized citizen of the United States as of September 
3, 1943.

    Approved November 21, 1997.
```
No. 00-954.

#### Johnson *v.*Tennessee.

Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.4



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TransDigm Inc.
(the Company) for the thirteen weeks ended December 27, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory Rufus, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant
Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the
Company for the periods indicated.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 3, 2004



/s/ Gregory RufusName:

Gregory RufusTitle: Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)




40
**Exhibit99.2**

 

INSWEB CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of InsWeb Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,William D. Griffin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  William  D. Griffin               |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| William D. Griffin  Chief Financial Officer |
| August 14, 2002                             |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Simon Zipkin, Defendant.

County Court, Monroe County,

November 13, 1952.

*553
      *Simon Zipkin,*defendant in person.

*Clarence J. Henry, District Attorney (John C. Little, Jr.,*of counsel), for plaintiff.

O’Mara, J.

On December 22, 1950, in Monroe County Court, consecutive sentences were imposed upon the defendant for the crimes of forgery in the second degree and grand larceny in the second degree and the defendant now moves to set aside the said sentences upon the contention that the imposition of the separate sentences to run consecutively violated section 1938 of the Penal Law which provides that *“*An act or omission which is made criminal and punishable in different ways, by different provisions of law, may be punishable under any one of those provisions, but not under more than one ”.

The defendant was found guilty on three counts set forth in the same indictment. The first count charged forgery in the second degree in violation of section 887 of the Penal Law. The second count charged forgery in the second degree in violation of subdivision 3 of section 881 of the Penal Law and the third count charged grand larceny in the second degree in violation of sections 1290 and 1296 of the Penal Law.

The first count charged the defendant with forging a check in the sum of $125; the second count charged the defendant with uttering the said check and the third count charged the defendant with obtaining the amount specified in the check. Sentence was suspended on the second count.

The crimes of forgery and grand larceny are separate and distinct, both in law and in fact, and that being so the imposition of consecutive sentences for each of the said crimes does not violate the provisions of section 1938 of the Penal Law. (See *People*v. *Skarczewski,*178 Misc. 160, affd. 287 N. Y. 826; and *People*v. *Erickson,*302 N. Y. 461.)

The aforesaid offenses constitute different crimes, the commission of which requires separate and different criminal acts. Their nature and definition is such that they cannot merge in a single offense. The sentences were lawfully imposed. (Penal Law, § 2190, subd. 4.)

The case of *People*v. *Florio*(301 N. Y. 46) is cited as an authority to support the defendant’s contention. The legality of consecutive sentences was not a point at issue in the *Florio*case and the reference made in the last paragraph of the prevailing opinion must be considered as dicta. The court merely set forth the settled practice pertaining to crimes of “ inclusion ”. The decision in *People*v. *Savarese*(114 N. Y. S. 2d*554816) has also been brought to my attention with the thought of sustaining the defendant’s position. I do not find myself in agreement with the decision reached in the *Savarese*case and I do not believe that Judge Sobel correctly analyzed the decision in the *Florio*case which he cites as the leading case in this State to sustain his conclusions.

The motion is denied.

Submit order accordingly.
#### William J. HORD et al., Appellants, v. Reubin ASKEW, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 53529.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 18, 1978.

Norton Bond, Pensacola, and Matthew W. Burns, Long Beach, Miss., for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., E. Wilson Crump, II, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David L. Selby of Selby, Chesser, Win-gard & Barr, Fort Walton Beach, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *Straughn v. Camp,*293 So.2d 689 (Fla.1974), app. dism., 419 U.S. 891, 95 S.Ct. 168, 42 L.Ed.2d 135 (1974).

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 12
                             Matrix Bancorp, Inc.

               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                                  (Unaudited)

                            (Dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Year Ended December 31,
                                                 1999       1998       1997       1996       1995
                                              --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                          <C>       <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
A.  Matrix Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries
    (consolidated)
Earnings:
     1.  Income before income taxes........   $ 17,057   $ 13,389   $ 13,297   $  5,848   $  6,392
     2.  Plus interest expense (A).........     44,234     36,822     18,471     10,670      7,410
                                              --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
     3.  Earnings including interest on
         deposits..........................     61,291     50,211     31,768     16,518     13,802
     4.  Less interest on deposits.........     21,589     16,221      8,376      3,760      2,184
                                              --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
     5.  Earnings excluding interest on
         deposits..........................   $ 39,702   $ 33,990   $ 23,392   $ 12,758   $ 11,618
                                              ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
Fixed Charges:
     6.  Including interest on deposits
         excluding capitalized interest....   $ 44,279   $ 36,901   $ 18,551   $ 10,708   $  7,410
     7.  Less interest on deposits (Line 4)     21,589     16,221      8,376      3,760      2,184
                                              --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
     8.  Excluding interest on deposits....   $ 22,690   $ 20,680   $ 10,175   $  6,948   $  5,226
                                              ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges:
         Including interest on deposits
         (Line 3 divided by Line 6)........      1.38x      1.36x      1.71x      1.54x      1.86x
         Excluding interest on deposits
         (Line 5 divided by Line 8)........      1.75x      1.64x      2.30x      1.84x      2.22x
</TABLE>
____________
(A)  Includes amounts representing the estimated interest component of net
rental payments.
#### Ex parte Daniel Wayne MALONE.

77-700.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 25, 1978.

BEATTY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and SHORES, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 51817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26270]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 192 / Friday, October 3, 1997 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 51817]]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

10 CFR Part 32

RIN 3150-AF76


License Applications for Certain Items Containing Byproduct 
Material; Correction

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a proposed rule appearing in the 
Federal Register on September 19, 1997 (62 FR 49173). The action is 
necessary to correct a publication date and cite.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Thomas, Office of Nuclear 
Regulatory Research, on 301-415-6230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On page 49173, in the second column, 
last paragraph, October 29, 1993 (58 FR 52670)'' should read 
``October 18, 1993 (58 FR 53670).''

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of September, 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David L. Meyer,
Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative 
Services, Office of Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-26270 Filed 10-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P