alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4

                     Amendment No. 1 to 1996 Stock Plan of
                         Galaxy Nutritional Foods, Inc.



<PAGE>


                         [GALAXY NUTRITIONAL FOODS LOGO]





                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                               1996 STOCK PLAN OF
                         GALAXY NUTRITIONAL FOODS, INC.


                                DECEMBER 14, 2001



The 1996 Stock Plan of Galaxy Nutritional Foods, Inc. is hereby amended by
deleting Article 4 thereof in its entirety and, in lieu thereof, substituting
the following:

"Article 4 - Stock

         The stock subject to Options, Awards and Purchases, shall be authorized
but unissued shares of the Common Stock of the Company, par value $.01 per share
(the "Common Stock"), or shares of Common Stock reacquired by the Company in any
manner. The aggregate number of shares which may be issued pursuant to the Plan
is 100,000, subject to adjustment as provided in paragraph 13. Any such shares
may be issued as ISO's, Non-Qualified Options or Awards, or to persons or
entities making Purchases, so long as the number of shares so issued does not
exceed such number, as adjusted. If any Option granted under the Plan shall
expire or terminate for any reason without having been exercised in full or
shall cease for any reason to be exercisable in whole or in part, or if the
Company shall reacquire any unvested shares issued pursuant to Awards or
Purchases, the unpurchased shares subject to such Options and any unvested
shares so reacquired by the Company shall again be available for grants of Stock
Rights under the Plan."

This Amendment No. 1 to the 1996 Stock Plan of Galaxy Nutritional Foods, Inc.
was adopted by the Board of Directors and the stockholders of Galaxy Nutritional
Foods, Inc., on December 14, 2001.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52726-52727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26733]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental Research; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Dental Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) 
meetings:


[[Page 52727]]


    Name of SEP: National Institute of Dental Research Special 
Emphasis Panel-Review of R44 grant (98-07).
    Dates: October 29, 1997.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Place: Natcher Building, Rm. 4AN-44F, National Institutes of 
Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Teleconference).
    Contact Person: Dr. Philip Washko, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 4500 Center Drive, Natcher Building, Room 4AN-44F, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-2372.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review grant applications and/or 
contract proposals.

    Name of SEP: National Institute of Dental Research Special 
Emphasis Panel-Review of R44 & R42 grants (98-09).
    Dates: November 14, 1997.
    Time: 10:00 a.m.
    Place: Natcher Building, Rm. 4AN-44F, National Institutes of 
Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 (teleconference).
    Contact Person: Dr. George Hausch, Chief, Grants Review Section, 
4500 Center Drive, Natcher Building, Room 4AN-44F, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 594-2372.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review grant applications and/or 
contract proposals.

    These meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research)

    Dated: October 2, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-26733 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26479]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. OA96-186-001]


UtiliCorp United Inc.; Notice of Filing

October 1, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 15, 1997, in compliance with the 
Commission's July 31, 1997, Order in this docket, UtiliCorp United 
Inc., filed with the Commission revised open access transmission tariff 
sheets on behalf of its Missouri Public Service Company, WestPlains 
Energy-Colorado, and WestPlains Energy-Kansas operating divisions. The 
revised tariff sheets separately state rates for Scheduling, System 
Control and Dispatch Service.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before October 10, 1997. 
Protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26479 Filed 10-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

IN RE: No. 08

- 16

- 00163

- CV

§

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION,

RELATOR §

§ AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus

against the Honorable Bonnie Rangel, Judge of the 171st District Court of El Paso County,

Texas, and concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We

therefore deny the petition for writ o f mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Exhibit 10.14
 
    
 LOCKE SOVRAN II L.L.C.
  Monthly Debt Service Payment Amount
 Loan Maturity
Date
  Applicable Interest Rate




---



##### 



Applicable Interest Rate Initial Interest Rate
 Application
 Late Charge
 Security; Defined Terms; Incorporation by Reference Individual Security
Instrument Security Instruments Other Security Documents




---



##### 



Debt
 Prepayment/Defeasance
 When Permitted Early Payment Date
 Notice Prepayment Date
 Prepayment After Event of Default Prepayment
Consideration




---



##### 



Yield Maintenance Amount Yield Maintenance Amount Treasury Rate
 Defeasance
 Defeasance Date




---



##### 



Scheduled
Defeasance Payments Defeasance Collateral
  Defeasance Security Agreement




---



##### 



REMIC Code
      Defeasance Period Rating Agencies




---



##### 



Successor Borrower Successor Borrower
 Defeasance Collateral Account Defeasance Collateral Account
 Release of Security Instruments Following Defeasance
 Purchase of Defeasance Collateral




---



##### 



Default Event of Default
    Acceleration
 Default Interest Default Rate Prime Rate Default Rate Calculation
Date Prime
Rate




---



##### 



Attorney Fees
 Limit of Validity Maximum
Rate
 No Oral Amendments
 Exculpation




---



##### 



Borrowing Group
 Assignment
 Applicable Law, Jurisdiction
 Joint and Several Liability
 Waiver of Presentment, Etc




---



##### 



No Waiver
 Notices
 Lender:
    
    PNC Bank, National Association
210 West 10th Street, 6th Floor
Kansas City, Missouri 64105Borrower:
    
    Locke Sovran II L.L.C.
6467 Main Street
Buffalo, New York 14221
  Severability
 Time of the Essence
 Additional Terms and Provisions




---



##### 



Optional Lender Forbearance
 Property Cash Flow Payment Amount Lockbox
Agreement
    Applicable Interest Rate Adjusted Interest Rate Specified U.S. Treasury
Security Wall Street Journal Yield Rate Wall Street Journal




---



##### 



Mortgaged Property Individual
Property Individual Security
Instrument




---



##### 



BORROWERLOCKE SOVRAN II L.L.C., a New York limitedliability company, by its ManagerBy: LOCKE SOVRAN II MANAGER, INC., aDelaware corporationBy:Michael J. Rogers, Vice President




---



##### 



ACKNOWLEDGMENT (IN NEW YORK STATE)
 THE STATE OF NEW YORK
    
    ::COUNTY OF ERIE
    
    :
  (Signature and Office of IndividualTaking Acknowledgment)




---



##### 



PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy:Jeannette Butler, Vice President
Exhibit 32.2 - Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of RPM Advantage, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
thereof (the "Report").

I, David R. Pressler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David R. Pressler
--------------------------
    David R. Pressler
    CEO President and Director


Date  April 25, 2011
      -----------------
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Joseph CONTRERAS, Respondent.

No. 38338.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 22, 1969.

*307Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., William D. Roth and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Attys. Gen., for petitioner.

Walter D. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, for respondent.

DREW, Justice.

The sole question presented here is whether the sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal trial may be questioned on appeal in the absence of a motion for a new trial duly filed in the trial court wherein such question is appropriately raised and passed upon by the trial court. The district court held that the filing of such motion for a new trial was not an indispensable condition precedent to a review of the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, relying upon its decision filed November 22, 1968, in Wright v. State.1

The *Wright*case, *supra,*was reviewed by this Court and on June 18, 1969, this Court handed down its decision,2 holding that the filing of such motion is essential to appellate review of the sufficiency of the evidence and that Rule 6.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A., did not in any way change such requirement. On the authority of the decision of this Court in State v. Wright, *supra,*certiorari is granted, the decision of the district court insofar as it relates to the subject matter of these proceedings is quashed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, THORN-AL and CARLTON, JJ., concur.

1

. 216 So.2d 229 (2d 1968). Dist.Ct.App.Fla.

2

. State v. Wright, 224 So.2d 300 (Fla. 1969).
```

[104th Congress Public Law 101]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ101.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 49]]

Public Law 104-101
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the Federal building located at 1550 Dewey Avenue, Baker 
City, Oregon, as the ``David J. Wheeler Federal Building''. <<NOTE: Feb. 
                        1, 1996 -  [H.R. 2061]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 1550 Dewey Avenue, Baker City, 
Oregon, shall be known and designated as the ``David J. Wheeler Federal 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``David J. Wheeler 
Federal Building''.

    Approved February 1, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2061 (S. 1097):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-412 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 141 (1995):
                                    Nov. 2, S. 1097 considered and 
                                        passed Senate.
                                    Dec. 18, H.R. 2061 considered and 
                                        passed House.
                                                        Vol. 142 (1996):
                                    Jan. 5, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
377 .J STREET CRESCENT CITY, CALIFORNIA 95531**~4025** Administration/Finance: 707-464-7483 Utilities: 707-464-6517

May 10,2012

Dennis J. DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis 400 Seventh Street, S.W. Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. DeVany: PublicWorks/Pianning: FAX:

This letter is written inresponse to an e-mail from Kevin Adams ofyour office in regard to the CEC Essential Air Service (EAS) bid received from SkyWestAirlines, Inc. dba United Express for the period August 1, 2012 through July 31, 2014. As a member ofthe Border Coast Regional Airport Authority, the Crescent City City Council has reviewed the proposal and supports the selection of SkyWestAirlines. Our community looks forward to continued, reliable Essential Air Service from SkyWest Airlines. In the coming years, we would like to request the airline work with us to create a schedule best suited to the needs ofour users. A schedule that enhances the growth ofpassenger enplanements currently experienced and forecast to continue for this regional airport. We support the action awarding the EAS contract to SkyWest as ofAugust l, 2012. We look forward to continuingthe excellentworking relationship that we have experienced previously with SkyWest Airlines. Thankyou for your continued assistance and support. Sincerely,

Eugene M. Palazzo City Manager Cc: Jim Bernard, Airport Director Kevin Adams, OST
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 10664 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Glynzo Clark,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:16

- CR

- 109

- 1

**________________________ ______**  Before **Smith, Higginson,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  ***** Glynzo Clark pleaded guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm, and he was sentenced on remand from this court , see United States v. Clark , 49 F.4th 889, 891

- 92 (5th Cir. 2022) , to a 180

- month term of imprisonment and to a three

- year period of supervised release. In this appea l, Clark asserts that his prior burglary conviction , under **Tex. Penal Code** § 30.02(a),

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 1, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10664 Document: 60-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/01/2024No. 23

- 10664

2 was not a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). Clark concedes that this issue is foreclosed by United States v. Herrold , 941 F.3d 173, 182 (5th Cir. 2019) (en banc)

. He has raised the issue to preserve it for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance based on Herrold , or for an extension of time in which to file a brief. Because Clark’s argument is foreclosed, summar y affirmance is proper. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).
T he Government’s motion for summary affirmance is **GRANTED** , the alternative motion for an extension of time is **DENIED** , and the district court’s judgment is **A FFIRMED** 

. Case: 23-10664 Document: 60-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/01/2024
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2828 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to clarify 

that the prohibition on the use of Federal education funds for certain 

weapons does not apply to the use of such weapons in certain programs 

for activities such as archery, hunting, other shooting sports, or culinary 

arts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2023 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Ms. SINEMA, and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

of 1965 to clarify that the prohibition on the use of 

Federal education funds for certain weapons does not 

apply to the use of such weapons in certain programs 

for activities such as archery, hunting, other shooting 

sports, or culinary arts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Hunting 

5 Heritage and Education Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2828 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PROHIBITION ON USE OF FED2 ERAL EDUCATION FUNDS FOR CERTAIN 

3 WEAPONS AND RELATED TRAINING. 

4 Section 8526(7) of the Elementary and Secondary 

5 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7906(7)) is amended 

6 by inserting ‘‘, except that this paragraph shall not apply 

7 to the use of funds under this Act for activities carried 

8 out under programs authorized by this Act that are other9 wise permissible under such programs and that provide 

10 students with educational instruction or educational en11 richment activities, such as archery, hunting, other shoot12 ing sports, or culinary arts’’ before the period at the end. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 4.1

                       (FORM OF COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE)
               Incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida


                  NATIONAL HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
                             Authorized common stock
                       50,000,000 shares, $.001 par value


NUMBER __________                                  SHARES _____________________

                                                   CUSIP           63633W 10 2
                                                   -----------------------------
                                           (see reverse for certain definitions)

THIS CERTIFIES THAT ________________________________________________________

IS THE OWNER OF ___________________ FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES
OF COMMON STOCK

                  NATIONAL HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

transferable  on the books of the  Corporation  in person or by duly  authorized
attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.  This Certificate
is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent.

Witness the facsimile seal of the  Corporation  and the facsimile  signatures of
its duly authorized officers.

Dated: ____________________



----------------------------------            -----------------------------
             Secretary                                 President


                                      SEAL
#### Melvis H. COODY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-29.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Sept. 16, 1969.

Joseph A. Scarlett, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James Robert Yon, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgments of the lower court hereby appealed are affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
RECEIVED 

OPPT CBIC 

2012 AUG 28 AH 6: 34 

SEP 12 20\2. 

August 22, 2012 

Director, Chemical Control Division 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room4146 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Re: EPA- HQ- OPPT- 2003- 0012 

DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts 

Chambers Works 

Deepwater, NJ 08023 

DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100 

PFOA Data Submittal- Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples 

July 2012 Sample Data 

Dear Chemical Control Division: 

Attached please find a summary of PFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works 

weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A in July 2012. In accordance with the 

current site NJPDES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 2011), these results are provided 

to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic discharge monitoring reports. Per your request, the 

enclosures include two paper and two electronic copies of the analytical results from this 

monitoring period. 

Sincerely, 

... 

Jacques Monteux 

Unit Manager-Site Manufacturing Systems 

DuPont Chambers Works 

JM/clc 

Enclosures CONTAINS NO CBI 
Copy to: 

/Document Control Office 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room6428 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only) 

Principal Environmental Engineer 

NJDEP Division of Water Quality 

Bureau of Point Source Permitting- Region 2 

401 E. State Street 

P.O. Box029 

Trenton, NJ 08625-0029 
Analyte 

PFOA 

Sample ID 

Date 

Top (ft) 

Total (T)/ Bottom (ft) 

units Diss. (D) Duplicate# 

ug/L T 

Summary of Analytical Results 

662 - July 2012 

662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 

7/2/12 7/9/12 7/16/12 7/23/12 7/30/12 

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

1 1 1 1 1 

3.38 1.75 1.91 1.42 1.58 

PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid 

ug/L = micrograms per Liter 

ug/L = micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb) 

NO =not detected (shown as <LOO) 

NO - not quantifiable (shown as <LOQ) 

NO<LOO<NO<LOQ 

LOO = limit of detection = 0.0723 ug/L 

LOQ - limit of quantification = 0.1 00 ug/L 

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results 

represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 7/23/12. 

Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample 

collected on 7/23/12 represents the average of lab duplicate results. 

The NJOEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. 

< and NO= Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 

cw