alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000904535
<NAME> NATIONAL RECORD MART
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                         384,304
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 37,000,610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,077,672
<PP&E>                                      25,108,592
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,006,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,540,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,186,075
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,379
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,908,077
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,540,068
<SALES>                                    112,488,429
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           112,488,429
<CGS>                                       69,524,955
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               69,524,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            39,726,304
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,859,661
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,377,509
<INCOME-TAX>                                   484,861
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            892,648
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   892,648
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        

</TABLE>
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 35 ) ll-K - (B ) -2 3 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:49 AM Sheet 35of 325P. 2

/ II-K-(B)-2 3
GRAPH S COMPARINGTH E REVISE D PEDC o BOILE RCOS T ALGORITHM S T O ESTIMAT E FRO M OTHE RSOURCES . Lette r fro

m E . Medine , EE

A t o J . Pratapas , EPArSASD . Januar y 24 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-2 3
#### Robert D. RYAN and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Ruth GLADWELL and Richard M. Gladwell, Executor of the Estate of William W. Gladwell, deceased, Respondents.

No. 69-166.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 16, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
#### Leatrice Fellner, Respondent, *v.*William Zuckerberg, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

June 19, 1952.

*Louis Drell*for appellant.

*Leatrice Fellner,*respondent in person.

*612
      *Per Curiam.*

The defendant’s employment having been terminated without fault on his part, whether the plaintiff is entitled to the return of any part of the fee paid for the conduct of the action to its conclusion, depends on the intention of the parties when the payment was made, to be determined from the receipt and all the surrounding circumstances. These issues should be explored fully.

The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Hoestadter and Schreiber, JJ., concur in *Per Curiam*memorandum ; Hecht, J., dissents and votes for reversal of the judgment and dismissal of the complaint.

Judgment reversed, etc.
Exhibit 32.1 - Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of RPM Advantage, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report").

I, David R. Pressler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David R. Pressler
--------------------------
    David R. Pressler
    CEO President and Director


Date  April 25, 2011
      -----------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  49,185
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,607
<INVENTORY>                                    37,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               92,859
<PP&E>                                         18,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                  8,753
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                110,193
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          33,389
<BONDS>                                        24,780
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           65
<OTHER-SE>                                     47,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  110,193
<SALES>                                       264,201
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              264,201
<CGS>                                         217,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 217,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  545
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,475
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,806
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,669
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,669
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .41



</TABLE>
#### Jewell Eunice Hughes MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Leaman L. MITCHELL, Sr., Defendant-Relator.

No. 2864.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Aug. 26, 1969.

Ford E. Stinson, Benton, for defendant-relator.

Gahagan & Gahagan, by Donald G. Kelly, Natchitoches, for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant-relator applies for rehearing as to our previous denial of his application for supervisory writs.

*188We are unable to consider the application for rehearing. Under Rule XI, Section 6, Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal (1963), an application for rehearing will not be considered as to the action of the court in granting or *refusing- to grant*supervisory writs.

Application for rehearing not considered.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-267]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Research, Evaluation and Communication; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Research, Evaluation and 
Communication.
    Date and Time:

January 27, 1997; 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
January 28, 1997; 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Place: Room 1280, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Christopher J. Dede, Program Director, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Room 855, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone (703) 
306-1651.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals and provide advice and 
recommendations as part of the selection process for proposals 
submitted to the Research on Education, Policy and Practice (REPP) 
Program.
    Reason for Closing: Because the proposals reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with 
proposals, the meetings are closed to the public. These matters are 
within exemptions (4) and (6) of 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), Government in the 
Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 2, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-267 Filed 1-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Hooker Furniture Corporation (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, E. Larry Ryder, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                            |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------ |  | 
|Date: September 6, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ E. Larry Ryder                         |  | 
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | E. Larry Ryder                             |  | 
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President - Finance and    
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Administration and Chief Financial Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2943 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to require 

schools to provide fluid milk substitutes upon request of a student or 

the parent or guardian of such student, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Mr. FETTERMAN (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. BOOKER, and Mr. WICKER) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to require schools to provide fluid milk substitutes 

upon request of a student or the parent or guardian 

of such student, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Addressing Digestive 

5 Distress in Stomachs of Our Youth Act’’ or the ‘‘ADD 

6 SOY Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2943 IS

1 SEC. 2. FLUID MILK SUBSTITUTES. 

2 Section 9(a)(2)(B) of the Richard B. Russell Na3 tional School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1758(a)(2)(B)) is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in clause (i)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘may’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘shall’’; 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘and meets’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘as determined by the most recent Dietary 

10 Guidelines for Americans published under sec11 tion 301 of the National Nutrition Monitoring 

12 and Related Research Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 

13 5341) or that meets’’; and 

14 (C) by striking ‘‘for students who cannot 

15 consume fluid milk because of a medical or 

16 other special dietary need other than a dis17 ability described in subparagraph (A)(iii)’’; 

18 (2) in clause (ii)— 

19 (A) by striking ‘‘may’’ and inserting 

20 ‘‘shall’’; 

21 (B) by striking ‘‘the school notifies the 

22 State agency’’ and all that follows through ‘‘if 

23 the substitution is’’; 

24 (C) by striking ‘‘by written statement of a 

25 medical authority or’’; 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 2943 IS

1 (D) by inserting ‘‘student or a’’ after ‘‘by 

2 a’’; and 

3 (E) by striking ‘‘that identifies the medical 

4 or other special dietary need that restricts the 

5 student’s diet’’; and 

6 (3) by striking clause (iii). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**INSWEB CORPORATION**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of InsWeb Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to InsWeb Corporation, and will be retainedby InsWeb Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

 
| /s/  MARK P. GUTHRIE             |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Mark P. Guthrie                       |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Dated: August13, 2003                 |
|                                  |
|                                  |
| /s/  WILLIAM D.GRIFFIN           |   |
| William D. Griffin                    |
| Chief Financial Officer               |
| Dated : August 13, 2003               |

 

----
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.1  


 
 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AGREEMENT    
  



        This AMENDMENT NO. 1 is made as of the 14th day of February, 2002 (the "Amendment") by and between Kevin Kimberlin Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
("KKP"), The Immune Response Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Seller") and Oshkim Limited Partnership ("Oshkim"). 


        WHEREAS,
the Seller and the KKP entered into that certain Intellectual Property Agreement dated as of November 9, 2001 (the "IP Agreement"). 


        WHEREAS,
the Seller proposes to issue and sell Additional Securities to Oshkim and Oshkim wishes to purchase Additional Securities from Seller. 



        WHEREAS,
the parties desire to amend the IP Agreement to add Oshkim as a party and in certain other respects as set forth below. 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants set forth below, the parties hereby amend the IP Agreement and agree as follows: 


        1.    Effective
as of the date of this Amendment, the IP Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 




	a.
	Oshkim
shall be a party to the IP Agreement.



	b.
	All
references in the IP Agreement to "Lender" shall be deemed to refer to both Oshkim and KKP. 





        2.    Except
as specifically provided herein, the IP Agreement, as originally executed by the parties thereto and as amended hereby, shall remain in full force and effect. 


        3.    Any
defined terms not defined herein shall have the respective meanings set forth in the IP Agreement. 



        4.    This
Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 


        5.    This
Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of New York applicable to agreements made and to be performed entirely
within such jurisdiction. 





 

        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written. 



	 	 	KEVIN KIMBERLIN PARTNERS, L.P.
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	

	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	

	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	OSHKIM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	

	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	

	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	

	 	 	THE IMMUNE RESPONSE CORPORATION
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	

	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	

	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	





2









QuickLinks


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AGREEMENT
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23



                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-36671) pertaining to the 1996 Amended and Restated Employee Stock
Option Plan and the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Matrix Capital
Corporation of our report dated March 6, 1998, except for Note 18, as to which
the date is March 25, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Matrix Capital Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and 1997 and
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997 included in
the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                         /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                         ---------------------
Phoenix, Arizona
March 25, 1998
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.1

The Board of Directors
Petsec Energy Ltd

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-6128) of Petsec Energy Ltd of our report dated March 28, 2002
, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Petsec Energy Ltd and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 2001 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of
the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2001 which report appears
in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 20-F of Petsec Energy Ltd.

In our report dated April 15, 2000, we did not express an opinion on the 1999
financial statements due to material uncertainties relating to the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern. These uncertainties arose as a result of
the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Petsec Energy Inc. ("PEI") being in
default of its borrowing covenants. As disclosed in Note 9(a) of the 1999
financial statements, PEI filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As a result of this filing control over PEI became
impaired and consequently PEI was deconsolidated as of that date. On January 16,
2001, PEI emerged as a re-organised entity under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
resulting in the settlement of all outstanding claims and the discharge of all
liabilities of PEI. Accordingly, our present opinion on the 1999 financial
statements, as presented herein, is different from our previous report.

KPMG

Sydney, Australia
February 4, 2003
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-95,435-01

EX PARTE JUAN CARLOS BALDERASCASTRO, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. C-4-W012398-1660977-A IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4

FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant pleaded guilty and was convicted of driving while intoxicated with a child under

15 years of age, with an affirmative deadly weapon finding, and sentenced to 6 months in State Jail.

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the

district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because the sentence the parties agreed to

is illegal. Based on the record, the trial court has determined that Applicant’s plea was involuntary

because the sentence is outside the statutory range and is therefore illegal.

Relief is granted. Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970). The judgment in cause

number 1660977 in the Criminal District Court No. 4 District Court of Tarrant County is set aside,
2

and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Tarrant County to answer the charges as

set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessarybench warrant within ten days from

the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: April 17, 2024

Do not publish
Exhibit 32.2 - Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of RPM Advantage, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the "Report").

I, David R. Pressler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David R. Pressler
--------------------------
    David R. Pressler
    CEO President and Director


Date  April 25, 2011
      -----------------