alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| Subsidiary                                              |   |                |   | OrganizedUnder the Laws of |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                                                    |   |                |
| Merge Healthcare Canada Corp.                           |   | Ontario, Canada     |
| Cedara Software (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.                     |   | China               |
| Confirma Europe GmbH i.L                                |   | Germany             |
| Confirma Europe LLC                                     |   | Washington          |
| etrials Worldwide Limited                               |   | United Kingdom      |
| Merge Asset Management Corp.                            |   | Delaware            |
| Merge Cedara ExchangeCo Limited                         |   | Ontario, Canada     |
| Merge eClinical Inc.                                    |   | Delaware            |
| Merge Healthcare Solutions Inc.                         |   | Delaware            |
| Merge Technologies Holdings Co.                         |   | Nova Scotia, Canada |
| Requisite Software Inc.                                 |   | Delaware            |
| Merge SF Holdings, Inc.                                 |   | Delaware            |
| Merge SH Holdings, Inc.                                 |   | Delaware            |
| O.I.S. Global Ltd. P.C.                                 |   | Israel              |
| CCS Pawlowski GmbH (63% of voting stock owned by Merge) |   | Germany             |

----
#### Eugene E. DOLPHUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-166.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 13, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 23, 1970.

Eugene Dolphus, in prp. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and J. Terrell Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the record on appeal, the extensive briefs of the appellant, and the brief of the State. On the basis thereof, we conclude that no harmful error has been made to appear. The judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 282 

To designate a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as wilderness. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2023 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. BENNET, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. CARPER, Mr. CASEY, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. 

LUJA ́N, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. PETERS, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. 

WHITEHOUSE, Mr. WYDEN, Ms. WARREN, Mr. WELCH, Mrs. MURRAY, 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. DUCKWORTH, 

and Ms. STABENOW) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To designate a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge 

as wilderness. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Arctic Refuge Protec5 tion Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 282 IS

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF PORTION OF ARCTIC NATIONAL 

2 WILDLIFE REFUGE AS WILDERNESS. 

3 Section 4 of the National Wildlife Refuge System Ad4 ministration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd) is amended 

5 by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(p) DESIGNATION OF CERTAIN LAND AS WILDER7 NESS.—Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, 

8 a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska 

9 comprising approximately 1,559,538 acres, as generally 

10 depicted on the map entitled ‘Arctic National Wildlife Ref11 uge, Coastal Plain Proposed Wilderness’, dated October 

12 20, 2015, labeled with Map ID 03–0172, and available 

13 for inspection in the offices of the Secretary, is designated 

14 as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation 

15 System under the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et 

16 seq.).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Frank C. ROZLER, Sr., L. Donald Sutton, Lester L. Bauer, Thomas Moore and George Fivek, Appellants, v. Ellsworth HOPPE, Appellee.

No. 70-1090.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 31, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; L. Clayton Nance, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 99.4
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
  I, Denis Turcotte, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 
 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Algoma Steel Inc.;2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of and for the periods presented in this report;4.
The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and5.
The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Dated:   May 20, 2004

*Denis Turcotte*Denis TurcottePresident and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JUAN DAVILA-BAJANA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 04-253 Erie

v. )

)

TIM HOLOHAN, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on September 7, 2004,

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Amended Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 45],

filed on July 18, 2006, recommended that Defendants’ motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 16]

be granted in part and denied in part. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the

date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on

Defendants. Defendants filed objections on July 21, 2006 [Doc. No. 47]. After de novo

review of the motion and documents in the case, together with the Amended Report

and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants’ motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 16]

is GRANTED as to the FTCA claim and Eighth Amendment claim, and DENIED as to

the retaliation claim. 

The Amended Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 45] of Magistrate Judge

Baxter, filed on July 18, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:04-cv-00253-SJM-SPB Document 49 Filed 08/08/06 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23





                         Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
Matrix Bancorp, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration  statement (No.
333-51516) on Form S-8 of Matrix  Bancorp,  Inc. of our report dated February 7,
2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Matrix Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of
income,  shareholders'  equity and comprehensive  income, and cash flows for the
year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2001, Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Matrix Bancorp, Inc.

Our  report  refers  to a change  in the  method of  accounting  for  derivative
instruments and hedging activities.


                                                /s/ KPMG LLP

                                                KPMG LLP


Denver, Colorado
March 13, 2002
```

[104th Congress Public Law 83]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ83.104]

[[Page 109 STAT. 797]]

Public Law 104-83
104th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
Providing for the appointment of Anne D'Harnoncourt as a citizen regent 
of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. <<NOTE: Dec. 28, 
                       1995 -  [H.J. Res. 111]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, 
in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by reason of the 
expiration of the term of Samuel Curtis Johnson of Wisconsin on December 
4, 1995, is filled by the appointment of Anne D'Harnoncourt of 
Pennsylvania. The appointment is for a term of six years and shall take 
effect on December 5, 1995.

    Approved December 28, 1995.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 111:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):
            Nov. 7, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 20, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26436]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

DATE AND TIME: Friday, October 10, 1997, 9:30 a.m.

PLACE: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Room 
540, Washington, DC 20425.

STATUS:

Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Approval of Minutes of September 5, 1997 and September 22, 1997
III. Announcements
IV. Staff Director's Report
V. Advisory Committee Reports
    Utah: ``Employment Discrimination in Utah''
    Wisconsin: ``The Hmong in Green Bay: Refugees in a New Land''
VI. Commissioner Higginbotham's Proposal Concerning Issuance of Reports
VII. Asian American Complaint and Petition
VIII. Management Information System
IX. Future Agenda Items

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Barbara Brooks, Press and 
Communications (202) 376-8312.
Stephanie Y. Moore,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-26436 Filed 10-1-97; 1:01 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25859]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[NAFTA-01881]

Fruit of the Loom; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To 
Apply for NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance

Martin Mills, Inc., D/B/A St. Martinville Mills, Including Former 
Employees of Jeanerette Mills, St. Martinville, Louisiana
NAFTA-01881A, Abbeville Mills, Division of Martin Mills, Inc., 
Including Former Employees of Jeanerette Mills, Abbeville, Louisiana

and

NAFTA-01881B, Port Barre Mills, Division of Martin Mills, Inc., 
Including Former Employees of Jeanerette Mills, Port Barre, 
Louisiana

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), the 
Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for 
NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance on August 29, 1997, applicable 
to workers of Fruit of the Loom, Martin Mills, Inc., located in St. 
Martinville, Abbeville, and Port Barre, Louisiana. The notice will soon 
be published in the Federal Register.
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in employment related to the production of T-shirts, briefs, boxers and 
layette. Findings on review show that some of the workers at the 
subject firm locations in Louisiana have had their wages reported to 
the separate Unemployment Insurance tax account for Jeanerette Mills, a 
subsidiary of Fruit of the Loom. Other new findings show that Martin 
Mills, Inc., in St. Martinville, Louisiana is doing business as St. 
Martinville Mills. Based on this new information, the Department is 
amending the certification to reflect these matters.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-01881 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Fruit of the Loom, Martin Mills, Inc., doing 
business as St. Martinville Mills, including former employees of 
Jeanerette Mills, St. Martinville, Louisiana (NAFTA-01881), 
Abbeville Mills, Division of Martin Mills, Inc., including former 
employees of Jeanerette Mills, Abbeville, Louisiana (NAFTA-01881A), 
and Port Barre Mills, Division of Martin Mills Inc., including 
former employees of Jeanerette Mills, Port Barre, Louisiana (NAFTA-
01881B), who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after August 14, 1996, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed in Washington, D.C. this 14th day of September 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-25859 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
#### Anne RAULERSON, Appellant, v. S. W. RAULERSON, a/k/a Sidney Wayne Raulerson, a/k/a John Raulerson, Appellee.

No. 69-53.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 7, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### In re FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS.

No. 39083.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 23, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

At the time of the adoption of Section 10(c) of Article II of the Rules of this Court relating to Admissions to the Bar, 32 F.S.A. all questions propounded were of the essay type. Since said time, and particularly in the past three bar examinations, in order to improve the quality of examination questions and expedite procedures, material changes have been made. A careful analysis of the past two examinations convinces this Court that such changes now require a change in such rule increasing the spread between the average of the top ten highest grades and the failing percentage.

Therefore,

It is ordered that Section 10(c) of Article II of the Rules of this Court relating to Admissions to the Bar, effective August 31, 1967, be and the same is hereby amended by striking all of said rule and adopting the following new Section 10(c) in lieu thereof:

> “(c) Each examination shall consist of twenty questions. Only the following subjects, including their equitable aspects and their ethical and professional responsibility aspects, shall be used in examinations promulgated by the Board of Bar Examiners:

> Contracts

> Constitutional Law Federal State

> Wills and Administration of Estates Trusts

> Criminal Law and Procedure Corporations Real Property Evidence Torts

> Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

> “All examination papers of applicants for the Bar shall be examined by the Board and the graders. Each answer shall be graded and credited with reference to a perfect standard of 100%. Upon the conclusion of said examination and the compilation of the grades received by all applicants, designated by number and not by name, the Board shall add the ten highest grades received, divide the total thereof by ten and shall certify to the Supreme Court the names of the applicants who receive a grade within twenty-five points of such result. All such applicants shall be entitled to be admitted as having attained a passing grade.”

This order shall be effective October 21, 1969.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 1997)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 50477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25740]



[[Page 50475]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part VIII





The President





_______________________________________________________________________



Notice of September 24, 1997--Continuation of Emergency With Respect to 
UNITA


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 186 / Thursday, September 25, 1997 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 50477]]

                Notice of September 24, 1997

                
Continuation of Emergency With Respect to UNITA

                On September 26, 1993, by Executive Order 12865, I 
                declared a national emergency to deal with the unusual 
                and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the 
                United States constituted by the actions and policies 
                of the National Union for the Total Independence of 
                Angola (``UNITA''), prohibiting the sale or supply by 
                United States persons or from the United States, or 
                using U.S.-registered vessels or aircraft, of arms and 
                related material of all types, and petroleum and 
                petroleum products to the territory of Angola, other 
                than through designated points of entry. The order also 
                prohibits the sale or supply of such commodities to 
                UNITA. Because of our continuing international 
                obligations and because of the prejudicial effect that 
                discontinuation of the sanctions would have on the 
                Angolan peace process, the national emergency declared 
                on September 26, 1993, and the measures adopted 
                pursuant thereto to deal with that emergency, must 
                continue in effect beyond September 26, 1997. 
                Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the 
                National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am 
                continuing the national emergency with respect to 
                UNITA.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                     September 24, 1997.

[FR Doc. 97-25740
Filed 9-26-97; 11:30 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
October 11, 2011

Ms. Brooke Shimabukaro 17204 Spinning Avenue Torrance, CA 90504

Dear Ms. Shimabukaro:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from § 121.311(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your October 3, 2011, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2011- 1083), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

 The specific reasons why you need to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside

the United States.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-49810,  No. 333-106151,  No. 333-106152,  No. 333-106153,  No.
333-49810 and Form S-3 No.  333-110090 and 333-111092) of our report dated March
14, 2003 with respect to the consolidated  financial  statements and schedule of
Tarrant Apparel Group and subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2001 and
2002 included in the Annual  Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended  December 31,
2003.


                                                  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Los Angeles, California
April 2, 2004