alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26390]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Minerals Management Service


Alaska Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Region Offshore Advisory 
Committee; Notice and Agenda for Meeting

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Alaska OCS Region Offshore Advisory Committee of the 
Minerals Management Service will meet on November 6th and continue on 
November 7th (if necessary), 1997.
    The agenda will cover the following principal subjects:

--the alternatives and mitigating measures for Proposed OCS oil and gas 
lease Sale 170, Beaufort Sea.

    The meeting is open to the public. Upon request, interested parties 
may make oral presentations or submit written materials to the Alaska 
OCS Region Offshore Advisory Committee. Such requests should be made no 
later than October 29, 1997. Requests to make oral statements should be 
accompanied by a summary of the statement to be made. All oral 
presentations and written statements submitted before the conclusion of 
the meeting will be made part of the meeting record and will be made 
available to the Committee for its discussions. For more information, 
call Michele Hope at (907) 271-6424.
    Transcripts of the Alaska OCS Region Offshore Advisory Committee 
meeting will be available for public inspection and copying at the 
Minerals Management Service in Anchorage, Alaska.

DATES: Thursday, November 6, 1997, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm and will continue 
on Friday, November 7, 1997, 9:00 am to 12 noon, if necessary.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the University Plaza Building, 
949 East 36th Ave., Minerals Management Service, 3rd Floor Conference 
Room, Anchorage, Alaska 99508. Requests for oral presentations to be 
made on November 6th can be made to the same address or by phone, 
Attention: Michele Hope at (907) 271-6424.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michele Hope at the address and phone 
number listed above.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, 5 
U.S.C. Appendix 1, and the Office of Management and Budget's 
Circular No. A-63, Revised.

    Dated: September 30, 1997.
Robert J. Brock,
Acting Regional Director, Alaska OCS Region, Minerals Management 
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-26390 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-M
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6350

GEORGE CARTER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. BRICK TRIPP, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:17

- hc

- 02009

- FL )

Submitted : July 19, 2018 Decided: July 24, 2018

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. George E. Carter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: George Carter, a D.C. Code Offender, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U .S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Carter has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional p rocess. DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------



    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Timothy  R.  Kasmoch, as the Chief Executive Officer of N-Viro International
Corporation,  certify  that (i) the Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) fully complies
with  the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1)
fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of  operations  of  N-Viro  International  Corporation.


/s/ Timothy  R.  Kasmoch
------------------------
Timothy  R.  Kasmoch,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer
April  30,  2010
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004

- 2595  p202 624

- 2500  f202 628

- 5116

Crowell & Moring LLP  www.crowell.com  Washington, DC  New York  San Francisco  Los Angeles  Orange County  Anchorage  London  Brussels Gerald F. Murphy

(202) 508

- 8855

gmurphy@crowell.com

September 2 4 , 2014

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director

, Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

Room W86

- 316

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Notice of Dormancy ( San Francisco/Los Angeles

- Guadalajara , Mexico)

Mexico Procedural Docket (DOT

- OST

- 2011

- 0076)

Dear Mr. Gretch:

United 1 currently holds operating designations to provide scheduled service between San

Francisco and Los Angeles, on the one hand, and Guadalajara, Mexico, on the other hand. 2

United is writing to advise the Department that it has decided to discontinue its service on these

routes.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Respectfully submitted,

Gerald F. Murphy

Counsel for

United Airlines, Inc.

cc: Robert Finamore

Brian Hedberg

Brett Kruger

All Parties on the attached Service List

1 Common names are used for airlines.

2 See Applications of United for Renewal dated Nov. 5, 2012 in Docket DOT

- OST

2010

- 0295 (Los Angeles

- Guadalajara) and Jan . 17, 201 3 in Docket DOT

- OST

- 2011

- 0048 (San

Francisco

- Guadalajara).Crowell & Moring LLP  www.crowell.com  Washington, DC  New York  San Francisco  Los Angeles  Orange County  Anchorage  London  Brussels SERVICE LIST

bob.kneisley@wnco.com

leslie.abbott@wnco.com

msinick@ssd.com

howard.kass@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com

pmurphy@ggh

- airlaw.com

jhill@cooley.com

perkmann@cooley.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com

c hris.walker@delta.com dkirstein@yklaw.com

jyoung@yklaw.com

thomas.ting@suncountry .com

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com

matwood@cozen.com

barbara.russell@virginamerica.com

john.varley@virginamerica.com

anita.mosner@hklaw.com

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com

dwight.moore@transcom.mil

john.s.duncan@faa.gov

englets@state.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2720

BARON J. BELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ARUNDEL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INCORPORATED; HANS F. MAYER, President, Board of

Directors; KATHLEEN M. KOCH, Executive Director; SHERRY WILLIAMS, Program Director; ADRIAN

WISEMAN, Member, Board of Directors,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederick N. Smalkin, District Judge.

(CA-97-3823-S)

Submitted: January 19, 1999 Decided: February 10, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Baron J. Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Samuel Fax, Dana Michelle

Sirkis Wilson, SHAPIRO & OLANDER, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Baron J. Bell filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss

for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of

appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are

“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of

Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v.

Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have

thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of

appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1).

The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district

court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on October 16, 1998;

Bell’s notice of appeal was filed on November 17, 1998, which is

beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Bell’s failure to note a

timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves

this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Bell’s

appeal. We therefore grant the Appellees’ motion to dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52097-52098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26441]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5905-6]


Notice Of Public Meeting On Drinking Water Analytical Methods

    Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) is holding a three-day Protozoan Method Development Workshop on 
October 20-22, 1997, for the purpose of information exchange on 
research projects, currently underway, related to developing an 
improved analytical method for Cryptosporidium and Giardia to address 
detection,

[[Page 52098]]

enumeration and characterization of these protozoan in drinking water. 
This workshop will also address what performance criteria may be 
appropriate for an analytical method for the final Enhanced Surface 
Water Treatment Rule (ESWTR), to be promulgated in May 2002. Topics to 
be presented by experts may include methods that enhance the 
sensitivity and reliability of the ICR Protozoan Method, provide 
improved recovery efficiencies, determine speciation of Cryptosporidium 
and Giardia using molecular biological methods, and ascertain viability 
and infectivity of Cryptosporidium and Giardia.
    EPA is inviting all interested members of the public to attend the 
meeting, which will be held at Quality Hotel in Arlington, Virginia 
(Arlington Boulevard and North Courthouse Road). For further 
information regarding agenda or other aspects of the meeting, members 
of the public are requested to contact Crystal Rodgers of EPA's Office 
of Ground Water and Drinking Water at (202) 260-0676 or by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d3f22292a283f3e632e3f343e392c210d283d2c202c242163283d2c632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9fedf0fbf8faedecb1fcede6ecebfef3dffaeffef2fef6f3b1faeffeb1f8f0e9">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 30, 1997.
Cynthia C. Dougherty,
Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.
[FR Doc. 97-26441 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26981]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Big Bend Road Access, Wenatchee National Forest, Kittitas County, 
Washington

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Cancellation of an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 19, 1994, a Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an 
environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Big Bend Road Access on 
the Cle Elum Ranger District of the Wenatchee National Forest was 
published in the Federal Register (59 FR 26205). Forest Service has 
combined this access with another environmental analysis process. There 
will be no EIS for this specific road access project. The NOI is hereby 
rescinded.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this cancellation to Susan Carter, 
Environmental Coordinator, Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, 
Wenatchee, Washington 98801 or telephone 509-662-4335.

    Dated: October 3, 1997.
Sonny J. O'Neal,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 97-26981 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Page 1 of 2 **UNITED STA TES ENVIRONMENTA**  **L PROTECTION A GENCY** 

**WA SHINGTON, D.C. 20460**  **OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND** 

**POLLUTION PREVENTION**

**MEMORANDUM Date**  **:** 8/24/11 **SUBJECT: Abamectin. Amendment**  **to I**  **nclude Cowpea in the Tolerance on Dry Beans.**  **PC Code:** 122804 **DP Barcode:** D 3 93226 **Decision No.:** 436528 **Registration No s**  **. :**  100
- 1351, 100
- 898, 100
- 1154 **Petition No.:** 0E7738 **Regulatory Action:** Section 3 Registration **Risk A**  **ss essment Type:**  None **Case No.:** None **T XR No.:**  None **CAS No.:** 71751
- 41
- 2 **MRID No.:** None **40 CFR:** 180.449 Ver.Apr.08 **FROM:** Nancy

Dodd, Chemist Risk Assessment Branch III (RAB3) Health Effects D ivision (HED) (7509P) **THROUGH:** Leung Cheng, Senior Chemist

RAB3/HED (7509P) **TO:** Barbara Madden, RM#5

Registration Division (7505P)
**I. CONCLUSIONS**  HED, in consultation with the ChemSAC , has determined that the tolerance for abamectin on dry bean s should be on "bean, dry , seed" as originall y proposed b y the petitioner. Cowpea does not need to be excluded from the tolerance
. A label restriction should be added such as the fol lowing: "To be grown f or bean, dry

seed onl y. Do not feed or harvest c owpea forage or hay .” **II. ACTION REQUESTED**  The Interregional Research Project No. 4 (IR
- 4) proposed a tolerance for abamectin on “bean, dry , seed.” HED recommended for a tolerance o n “bean, dry , seed, except cowpea” in DP#380795 (N. Dodd, 5/18/11). In review of the Federal Register Notice for the proposed use,Page 2 of 2

HED’s recommended exclusion of cowpea from the tolerance was questioned. The issue was referred to the ChemSAC for review o n 8/24/11. **III .**  **BACKGROUND** HED intended to exclude cowpea from the dry bean tolerance since Table I Feedstuffs (June 2008) lists cowpea forage and hay as feeds for dairy

cattle at 20% of the diet. Cowpea forage and hay are not designated as under growe r control in Table I. As part of the review of the FR notice, HED was asked to reconsider exclusion of cowpea for the following reasons: 1) To harvest dry

bean, forage and hay cannot be harvested
. 2) The crop is specifically grown for hay or forage in some areas. 3) Forage varieties are distinct from dry seed varieties since they

are developed for high dry seed yi elds. 4) If cowpea is excluded , HED should exclude others. Southern pea, blackeye pea, cowpea, and crowder are all the same crop ( Vigna ungu iculata ) (Monograph 450 , Food and Feed C rops). **IV. RESULTS/DISCUSSION**  HED has determined, on advice from the ChemSAC, to include cowpea in the tolerance for dry bean s . A label restriction to restrict use of cowpea forage and hay should be added.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                    
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996               
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996               
<CASH>                                          74,947    
<SECURITIES>                                         0    
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,133,343    
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (143,539)   
<INVENTORY>                                          0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,487,595    
<PP&E>                                       8,806,593    
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,633,934)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,633,504    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,950,249    
<BONDS>                                              0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0    
<PREFERRED>                                          0    
<COMMON>                                     9,504,532    
<OTHER-SE>                                           0    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,633,504    
<SALES>                                      7,571,268    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,571,268    
<CGS>                                        4,946,620    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,946,620    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,459,865    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             224,407    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (129,291)   
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (88,200)   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0    
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0    
<CHANGES>                                            0    
<NET-INCOME>                                   (41,091)   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.04)   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0    
                                


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.247



                NON-OFFICER OPTION GRANT PROGRAM
                               OF
             ATLANTIC COAST AIRLINES HOLDINGS, INC.



           There  are 400,000 shares reserved for issuance  under
the  Non-Officer Option Grant Program.  Options granted under the
Non-Officer Option Grant Program are subject to the same terms as
non-qualified  stock  options granted under  the  Company's  1995
Stock  Incentive Plan or the Company's 2000 Stock Incentive  Plan
(both  of  which were approved by shareholders), as specified  in
the  terms  of  any  such grant.  The exercise price  of  options
granted  under  the plan can not be less than 100%  of  the  fair
market  value  of a share of the Company's stock  on  the  option
grant  date.  Options are granted by the Chief Executive  Officer
of  the Company with approval from the Compensation Committee  of
the  Board  of Directors.  Stock options granted under  the  Non-
Officer Option Program generally vest over a period ranging  from
[three  to  five  years] and expire 10 years after  the  date  of
grant.


           Grant  agreements under the Non-Officer  Option  Grant
Program substantially are in the same form as the grant agreement
filed as Exhibit 10.25(c) with this Annual Report on
Form  10-K  and  contain  the following additional  term:   "NOW,
THEREFORE,  by  executing this Option Agreement and  for  and  in
consideration of these premises, Optionee agrees that this Option
and   Option   Agreement  shall  be  treated,   interpreted   and
administered  as if granted under the Plan, that  all  terms  not
defined  in this Option Agreement shall have the meaning provided
for  under  the  Plan,"   The "Plan" is  defined  either  as  the
Company's  1995 Stock Incentive Plan or the Company's 2000  Stock
Incentive Plan, depending on the grant agreement.
The Board of Directors
Disc Graphics, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-28013 on Form S-8 of Disc Graphics, Inc. of our report
dated February 2, 2001, except for notes 6, 8 and 17, which are as of April 13, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Disc Graphics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000 and related schedule,
which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Disc Graphics, Inc.

| |                     
| | --------------------
| | KPMG LLP/s/ KPMG LLP

Melville, New York
April 13, 2001
METHODOLOGY FOR UTILITYAND 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 

James E. McMahon, LBNL 

Presentation to· DOE Workshop on Standards 

for Clothes Washers 

December 15, 1998 
UTILITY ANALYSIS 

• PURPOSE 

- Estimate effects on utilities from reduced energy sales · 

due to new energy efficiency standards 

• METHOD uses NEMS~NAECA 

- integrated model of U.S. e~ergy sector, including supply and demand 

- ) publicly available model, with forecast through 2020 

(Extrapolated to 2030 using FEMP method) 

. ·- current basis: EIA Annual Energy Outlook 1998 

- plan update to EIA Annual Energy Outlook 1999 
\ 

UTILITY ANALYSIS: INPUTS 

• Annual energy consumption and savings 

- by fuel type from National Energy Savings spreadsheet 

• AH other· in.puts from EIA 

< ... -.·-
UTILITY ANALYSIS: OUTPUT 

• NEMS-NAECA balances all supply and demand 

given savings from new energy. efficiency 

standard 

· • Change in energy sales and price 

- by fuel type 

- by region 

• Change in mix of electricity generation 

• Change in new capacity construction 
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 

• PURPOSE 

- estimate impacts from new energy efficiency standards 

on U.S. emissions of C02, NOx, and 802 

• METHOD 

- power plant emissions from NEMS-NAECA model 

- in-house emissions from spreadsheet 

+ S02 from oil-fired water heaters 

+ NOx from gas-fired water heaters
#### Tommy Lee MILES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-474.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 17, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.