alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32**


**Herborium
      Group, Inc.**


**Certification
      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Herborium Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Agnes Olszewski,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





*Date:*October
                20, 2008*/s/Agnes
                Olszewski**Agnes
                Olszewski**Chief
                Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
                and**Chief
                Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
                Officer)*





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
November 15, 2001


George A. Pacinelli
c/o Intercallnet, Inc.
6340 NW 5th Way
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309

Re:  Repayment of Payroll

Dear Mr. Pacinelli;

Please accept this letter as the official terms and conditions surrounding the
payroll deferral between you and Intercallnet, Inc. (the Company). You have
agreed to defer drawing payroll from the Company commencing with the payroll
period dated November 23, 2001 which represents the two week pay period ended
November 16,2001. Such payroll deferral will continue until the Company's cash
flow is sufficient to support the payment of payroll to you, as an executive of
the Company, but shall continue no longer than through December 31, 2001.
Interest shall accrue at a rate of prime plus 2% on a bi-weekly basis to be
calculated over the time period that such deferred amounts are outstanding.

When the Company's cash flow is sufficient to support the payment of payroll to
you as an executive, then bi-weekly payroll shall resume. At such time, the
total amount of the deferred payroll (including accrued interest) will be
reviewed and the repayment terms will be determined as either a lump sum
repayment or scheduled payments over a specific time period depending on the
financial condition of the Company.



Sincerely,                                         Accepted By:

/s/ Scott R. Gershon                               /s/ George A. Pacinelli
------------------------------------               --------------------------
Scott R. Gershon                                   George A. Pacinelli
Chief Executive Officer                            President
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2933 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2933

        To reauthorize the program of first responder training.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 26 (legislative day, September 22), 2023

 Ms. Baldwin (for herself, Ms. Hassan, and Mrs. Capito) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To reauthorize the program of first responder training.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Response Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAM.

    Section 546(h) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 290ee-
1(h)) is amended by striking ``$36,000,000 for each of fiscal years 
2019 through 2023'' and by inserting ``$57,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2024 through 2028''.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133299 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133299 

 COA: 264416 

Wayne CC: 05-002483-01

JOSEPH TATE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0618 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2007 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from ClickAction Inc.'s
Statement of Operations and Balance Sheets and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,214
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,633
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,538
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,673
<PP&E>                                             780
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,337
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,650
<SALES>                                         21,265
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,265
<CGS>                                            6,046
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,046
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,656
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,205)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        19
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,223)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)


</TABLE>
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 6 , 2018.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00871- CR

DANNY R. ALEJANDRO, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1003546

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal of a ruling denying appellant’s motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus.
Generally, a criminal defendant may appeal only from a final judgment. See
State v. Sellers , 790 S.W.2d 316, 321 n. 4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). The courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders in a criminal appeal2

absent express statutory authority. Apolinar v. State , 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); see also Ragston v. State , 424 S.W.3d 49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

The denial of a motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus is not a separately appealable order. Because this appeal does not fall within any exception to the general rule that an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment of conviction, we lack jurisdiction.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Donovan. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 52674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26865]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 81

[CA-003-BU; FRL-5907-8]


Clean Air Act Reclassification; California-Santa Barbara 
Nonattainment Area; Ozone

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of the public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 2, 1997, EPA published a proposed rule (62 FR 
46234) proposing to determine that the Santa Barbara moderate ozone 
nonattainment area has not attained the 1-hour ozone national ambient 
air quality standard (NAAQS) by the Clean Air Act (CAA) mandated 
attainment date for moderate nonattainment areas, November 15, 1996. If 
EPA takes final action on the determination as proposed, the Santa 
Barbara ozone nonattainment area will be reclassified by operation of 
law as a serious nonattainment area. On September 24, 1997, the Santa 
Barbara County Air Pollution Control District requested a 30-day 
extension of the comment period in order to allow a better opportunity 
for local stakeholders to provide input to EPA. In response to that 
request, EPA is announcing a 30-day extension of the public comment 
period on the September 2, 1997, proposed rule.

DATES: Written comments on the September 2, 1997, proposed rule must be 
received in writing by November 3, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments must be submitted to: U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region 9, Office of Air Planning, Air Division, 17th Floor, 75 
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105.
    Copies of EPA's draft technical support document for this 
rulemaking and EPA's policies governing attainment findings and 
extension requests are contained in the docket for this rulemaking. A 
copy of EPA's proposal (62 FR 46234) and the TSD are also available in 
the air programs section of EPA Region 9's website, <a href="http://www.epa.gov/
region09">http://www.epa.gov/
region09</a>. The docket is available for inspection during normal business 
hours at the following location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region 9, Office of Air Planning, Air Division, 17th Floor, 75 
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105, (415) 744-1248.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Jesson, Office of Air Planning 
(AIR-2), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne 
Street, San Francisco, California 94105, (415) 744-1288.

    Dated: October 2, 1997.
John Wise,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-26865 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the T REIT, Inc. (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, William C. Daniel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                        
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1.     The Report fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                       
|
| | 2.     The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
    the Company.



| |     |                      
| | --- | ---------------------
| | By: | /s/ WILLIAM C. DANIEL

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | William C. Daniel      
| | Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 14, 2003

38
**Exhibit 99.5**

 

[NASDAQ logo] 

 

 

*By Facsimile and First Class Mail*

 

July 9, 2003 

 

Mr. Peter J. Tallian 

Chief Financial Officer

TranSwitch Corporation 

Three Enterprise Drive 

Shelton, Connecticut 06484 

 

 

Dear Mr. Tallian: 

 

I am pleased to inform youthat based on our review and the information provided by the Company, and the execution of The Nasdaq National Market Listing Agreement, Staff has approved the Company’s request to transfer back to The Nasdaq National Market. Accordingly, theCompany’s securities will be transferred to The Nasdaq National Market at the opening of business on July 10, 2003. 

 

On October 9, 2002, Staff approved the Company’s application to list its common stock on The Nasdaq SmallCap Market. In addition, Staff notified the Company that itmay be eligible to transfer back to The Nasdaq National Market, without paying the initial listing fees, if the Company maintained compliance with the continued listing requirements for the National Market as set forth in Marketplace Rule 4450(a)and met the bid price requirement for thirty consecutive trading days. Staff notes that the Company’s common stock has traded above $1.00 for 30 consecutive trading days. Since our approval is based upon information provided to us by theCompany or filed by the Company with the SEC, you should notify us promptly of any material change(s) to such information. 

 

Should you have any questions regarding Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements, please contact me at 301-978-8018. 

 

Sincerely, 

 

 

/s/    MICHELLEBARTO

 

Michelle Barto 

Lead Analyst 

Nasdaq Listing Qualifications 

 

cc:    Mr. Jeffrey M. Held, Esq.
#### STATE of Florida, ex rel. Paul H. NECESSARY, Appellant, v. Donald S. GENUNG, as Sheriff of Pinellas County, Florida, Appellee.

No. 40845.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 14, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Nathaniel FIELDS, Robert Eugene Jackson and Jeffrey Edward Howard, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-403.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Dec. 11, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, 
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements and amendments and in the related Prospectuses thereto:



Form S-3 No. 333-115288 
Form S-8 No. 333-115851 
Form S-3 No. 333-113710



of Sun Healthcare Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 2, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sun Healthcare Group, Inc., Sun Healthcare Group, Inc. management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sun Healthcare Group, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLPErnst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 2, 2005
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TIMOTHY COOLEEN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 04-63 Erie

)

JOHN LAMANNA, et al., ) 

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Timothy Cooleen’s civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on March 1,

2004, and was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules

72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, filed on August 1, 2005, [Doc. No.

70] recommended that Defendants’ motion to dismiss or for summary judgment [Doc. No. 47] be

granted. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. 

Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. Objections were filed by

Plaintiff on August 12, 2005, and a Response to the Objections were filed by the Defendants on

August 19, 2005. After de novo review of the case, together with the report and

recommendation, objections thereto, and response to the objections, the following order is

entered:

AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2005,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants’ motion to dismiss or for summary

judgment [Doc. No. 47] is GRANTED. 

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated August 1, 2005, is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

The clerk is directed to mark the case closed. 

Case 1:04-cv-00063-SJM Document 74 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 2
2

s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: All parties of record. 

Case 1:04-cv-00063-SJM Document 74 Filed 08/30/05 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

HARRY L. BIERLEY, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 04-363 Erie

v. )

)

WARDEN JAMES VESHECCO, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on December 14,

2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 26], filed on

August 16 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be dismissed as moot and that

a certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the

date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and

on Respondent. Objections were filed by Petitioner on September 5, 2006 [Doc. No.

27]. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the

Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 6th day of September, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DISMISSED as moot and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 26] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on August 16, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:04-cv-00363-SJM-SPB Document 28 Filed 09/06/06 Page 1 of 1
1Revised CAIR Rule- BackgroundInformationJohn C. deRuyterApril 7, 20092EPA Emissions Trends ReportData Through 2007EPA National NOx Emissions Trends01,0002,0003,0004,0005,0006,0007,0008,0001970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010Year

Thousands of Tons/yrFUEL COMB. ELEC. UTIL.FUEL COMB. INDUSTRIALFUEL COMB. OTHERCHEMICAL & ALLIED PRODUCT MFGMETALS PROCESSINGPETROLEUM & RELATED INDUSTRIESOTHER INDUSTRIAL PROCESSESEPA National SO2 Emissions Trends02,0004,0006,0008,00010,00012,00014,00016,00018,00020,0001970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010Year

Thousands of Tons/yrFUEL COMB. ELEC. UTIL.FUEL COMB. INDUSTRIALFUEL COMB. OTHERCHEMICAL & ALLIED PRODUCT MFGMETALS PROCESSINGPETROLEUM & RELATED INDUSTRIESOTHER INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES5Prior CAIR RuleCAIR Annual EGU NOx Marginal Cost CurveCAIR 2015 NOxlimit 1.3MMTonsCAIR EGU SO2 Marginal Cost CurveCAIR 2015 SO2limit2.6MMTons9ICI Boiler Control CostOTC Meeting Presentation(JCD NOTE: 66% annual capacity factor is extremelyhigh formany units- falsely lowers apparent cost effectiveness)OTC Meeting Presentation(JCD NOTE: 66% annual capacity factor is extremelyhigh formany units- falsely lowers apparent cost effectiveness)OTC Meeting Presentation(JCD NOTE: 66% annual capacity factor is extremelyhigh formany units- falsely lowers apparent cost effectiveness)13Characterization of the USIndustrial Commercial BoilerPopulationEEAMay 2005141516Boiler Inventory- All Fuels482012502570Subtotal14901301360>250MMBtu/hr333011202210100-250MMBtu/hrTotalCommercialManufacturingUnit Capacity19Conclusions20Emissions Trend Conclusions- NOxTotal national NOx emissions were decreasingprior to 2002NOx SIP Call provided further significantreductions in 2003-2004Industrial combustion NOx increased 1999-2002Increase mostly from internal combustion (combturbines)Minor amount from coalIndustrial combustion NOx dominated by gas firing21Emission Trend Conclusions- SO2Total national SO2 emissions have been decreasingCAIR will further reduce utility SO2 emissionsReference point- 15.7 MMTPY in 19902010- 4.3 MMTPY reduction from 2003 levels45% reduction in covered states2015- 5.4 MMTPY reduction from 2003 levels57% reduction in covered statesAt full implementation- will limit SO2 emissions to2.5 MMTPY73% below 2003 levels84% reduction from 1990 levelsIndustrial fuel combustion SO2 emissions have beendecreasing- coal and oil reductions22Conclusions- Control CostsICI boiler control costs (cost effectiveness)are much higher than EGU cost effectivenessunder CAIR for both NOx and SO2Unit specific cost effectiveness is highly dependenton unit and facility design limitations, fuels,operation characteristicsOTC estimates likely understate individualunit cost effectiveness due to high assumedcapacity factor23Conclusions- Boiler Inventory45,660 total boilers >10 MMBtu/hrNatural gas dominates total boiler populationIndustrial fuel consumption heavily reliant on“other” fuelsFollowed by natural gasThen coal
Exhibit 23-1 The Board of Directors

American National Insurance Company:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-160698) of American
National Insurance Company (the Company) of our reports dated March 11, 2010, with respect to the consolidated
statements of financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity, comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2009, and the related financial statement schedules I  V, which reports appear in the December 31,
2009 annual report on Form 10-K of the Company. Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to a
change in the method of accounting for other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities as of April 1, 2009
due to the adoption of new FASB guidance. /s/ KPMG LLP Houston, Texas

March 11, 2010