alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25171]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CA-350-1020-00]


Notice of Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management; Northeast California Resource 
Advisory Council, Susanville, California; Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Bureau of Land Management's Northeast California 
Resource Advisory Council will meet Friday, Oct. 17, 1997, at the BLM's 
Eagle Lake Resource Area Office, 2950 Riverside Drive, Susanville, CA 
96130

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting begins at 10 a.m. in the 
Conference Room of the Eagle Lake Resource Area Office. Items on the 
agenda include a status report from the California State Office, 
discussion about phase 1 fire management planning, discussion about the 
California Environmental Impact Statement on Standards and Guidelines 
for Healthy Rangelands, a report from the recreation fee subcommittee, 
wild horse and burro gather plans, status of work by technical review 
teams in the Surprise Resource Area, and election of new officers. 
Public comments will be taken at 1 p.m. Depending on the number of 
people wishing to speak, a time limit may be established.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact Jeff Fontana, Public Affairs Officer, 
(916) 257-5381.
Linda D. Hansen,
Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-25171 Filed 9-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
#### Beverly Williams McELWEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William Tandy McELWEE, Jr., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 11558.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Feb. 2, 1971.

Paul Henry Kidd, Monroe, for plaintiff-appellant.

Campbell, Campbell, Marvin, & Johnson, by John T. Campbell, Minden, for defendant-appellee.

Before AYRES, PRICE, and HALL, JJ.

PRICE, Judge.

On November 15, 1966, a separation from bed and board was awarded unto Beverly Williams McElwee against William Tandy McElwee, Jr., along with the sum of $310.00 per month as alimony pen-dente lite.

On March 1, 1968, Beverly McElwee filed a rule agains.t William McElwee, seeking to have the sum of $5,070.00 declared past due and owing under the aforesaid judgment providing for alimony pen-dente lite, and further to have the court hold defendant in contempt for failure to comply with the judgment. William Mc-Elwee answered the. rule, contending that his wife was in possession of a sum in excess of $20,000.00 belonging to the community of acquets and gains formerly existing between them, and that any unpaid alimony should be offset against this sum already in the possession of Mrs. McElwee.

A written opinion by the trial judge was filed on February 27, 1969, rejecting the demands of the plaintiff-in-rule and upholding the contention of the defendant. No formal judgment was prepared and signed in Open Court in response to the trial judge’s reasons for his decision. A motion for a new trial was filed on March 18, 1969, and was set for hearing on April 11, 1969. A written judgment was signed on April 20, 1970, denying the motion for a new trial.

Although appellant’s motion for a devolutive appeal, which was granted by the court, signifies that she desires to appeal from the final judgment rendered in this cause on the 20th day of April, 1970, there has been no appealable judgment *36signed and filed in the record in this cause. The written reasons of the trial judge for his decision in the matter will not suffice. La.Code of Civil Procedure, art. 1918; Fisher v. Rollins, 231 La. 252, 91 So.2d 28 (1957); Succession of Babin, 206 So.2d 778 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1968).

An appeal is premature in the absence of a signed judgment in the record and we must dismiss this appeal ex proprio motu. La.Code of Civil Procedure, arts. 1911 and 2083; Heath v. Piermont Insurance Company, 211 So.2d 700 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1968); Advertiser, Division of Independent, Inc. v. Tubbs, 203 So.2d 418 (La. App. 3d Cir. 1967); Kleb v. Choate, 203 So.2d 422 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1967).

For the reasons assigned, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice at the cost of the appellant.
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Brian Hoekstra, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certification is being made for the exclusive purpose of
compliance by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company with the requirements
of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed,
distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically
required by law.

                                        /s/ Brian Hoekstra
                                        Brian Hoekstra
                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                        October 16, 2009
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-96192) pertaining to the registration of 2,526,025 shares of common
stock of VideoServer, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-28209)
pertaining to the registration of 223,881 shares of common stock of VideoServer,
Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-85245) pertaining to the
VideoServer, Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 333-44984) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1991 Stock Incentive
Plan and the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Ezenia! Inc., the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-66628) pertaining to the registration of 400,000
shares of common stock of Ezenia! Inc., and the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-75824) pertaining to the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, of our report dated
February 7, 2002, except as to the last paragraph of Note 9, as to which the
date is March 14, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Ezenia! Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2001.

                                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 2002

                                                                              48
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LANCE LAMONT GATLING, : 4:13-CR-00221

 :

 Petitioner : 

 v. : (Judge Brann)

 :

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :

 : 

 Respondent :

ORDER

August 25, 2015

In accordance with the accompanying memorandum, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1. Pro Se petitioner’s Lance Gatling’s motion under 28 U.S.C. §2255 to

vacate, set aside, or correct sentence ( ECF No. 99) is DENIED.

2. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE related case 4:15-CV01027.

BY THE COURT:

s/Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

1

Case 4:13-cr-00221-MWB Document 103 Filed 08/25/15 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**INSWEB CORPORATION**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I,William D. Griffin, Chief Financial Officer of InsWeb Corporation, certifythat:

 

(1)                                  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of InsWeb Corporation;

 

(2)                                  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

(3)                                  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

(4)                                  The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), for theregistrant and we have:

 

a.           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.           Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

 (5)                               The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors:

 

a.           All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.          Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| ** **                | **/s/  WILLIAM D. GRIFFIN** | ** ** |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------|------------|
| Dated:  November 10, 2005 | **William D. Griffin**      |
|                      | Chief  Financial Officer    |

 

----
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 21
                                        
                          MATRIX CAPITAL CORPORATION

                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant

1.   Matrix Financial Services Corporation - Incorporated in Arizona

2.   United Financial, Inc. - Incorporated in Colorado

3.   Matrix Capital Bank - Organized pursuant to a Federal savings and loan
     charter

4.   United Special Services, Inc. - Incorporated in Colorado

5.   United Capital Markets, Inc. - Incorporated in Colorado

6.   The Vintage Group Inc. - Incorporated in Texas

7.   Vintage Delaware Holdings, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware

8.   Sterling Trust Company - Incorporated in Texas

9.   First Matrix Investment Services Corp. - Incorporated in Texas

10.  Matrix Funding Corp. - Incorporated in Colorado

11.  Matrix Advisory Services Corporation - Incorporated in Colorado

12.  Equi-Mor Holdings, Inc. - Incorporated in Nevada

13.  Matrix Aviation Corporation - Incorporated in Colorado

14.  MCNP-1 Corp. - Incorporated in New Mexico


                                     II-3
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 127851 & (17) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 127851 COA: 258187 Genesee CC: 99-004796-FC NATHAN GENE REID, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e motion to add new ground for appeal is considered and it is GRANTED. The applicatio n for leave to appeal the D ecember 27, 2004 order of the Court of Appeals is also co nsidered, and it is DENIED, b ecause the defendant has failed to meet the burden of es tablishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1294

In re: VIVEK SHAH , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (No s . 5:12

- cr
- 00172

- 1; 5:13

- cr
- 00127

- 1; 5:15

- cv
- 07542)

Submitted : June 20, 2017 Decided: June 22, 2017

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Vivek Shah, petitioner pro se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Vivek Shah petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 22 55 (2012) motion . He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We conclude that the present record does not

re veal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Shah’s petition and supplemental petition for a writ of
mandamus

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions ar e adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### Armand BENEVENTO, Appellant, v. Lorraine BENEVENTO, Appellee.

No. 2148.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

May 5, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24587]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Notice of Availability of Composite Material Properties Data From 
Exclusive, Partially Exclusive or Non-exclusive Licenses

AGENCY: U.S. Army Research Laboratory, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Army announces the general availability 
of exclusive, partially exclusive or non-exclusive licenses relative to 
composite materials properties data produced by the U.S. Army Research 
Laboratory. Licenses shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael D. Rausa, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Office of Research and 
Technology Applications, ATTN: AMSRL-CS-TT/Bldg 434, Aberdeen Proving 
Ground, Maryland 21005-5425, Telephone: (410) 278-5028.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.
Mary V. Yonts,
Alternate Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-24587 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATIO
EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                              JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                       1
<CASH>                                                           10,980
<SECURITIES>                                                     11,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    34,839
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 65,651
<PP&E>                                                            1,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  125,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            35,202
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                         30,145
<OTHER-SE>                                                       16,362
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    125,969
<SALES>                                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                439,016
<CGS>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   400,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 19,383
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                1,196
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  18,407
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      6,381
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              12,026
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     12,026
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0.37


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         130,786
<SECURITIES>                                 1,312,169
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,259,317
<PP&E>                                       1,215,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                 319,436
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,039,439
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,071,094
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       104,712
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,864,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,039,939
<SALES>                                        202,409
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202,409
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,035,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,787,132)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,787,132)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.37)


</TABLE>
109 STAT. 190 PUBLIC LAW 104–16—JUNE 21, 1995

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 441:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–53 (Comm. on Indian Affairs).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):

Apr. 26, considered and passed Senate.

June 8, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 104–16

104th Congress

An Act

To reauthorize appropriations for certain programs under the Indian Child Protection

and Family Violence Prevention Act, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS.

Sections 409(e), 410(h), and 411(i) of the Indian Child Protection

and Family Violence Prevention Act (25 U.S.C. 3208(e), 3209(h),

and 3210(i), respectively) are each amended by striking ‘‘and 1995’’

and inserting ‘‘1995, 1996, and 1997’’.

Approved June 21, 1995.

June 21, 1995

[S. 441]