alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52327-52328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-538-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes In FERC Gas 
Tariff

October 1, 1997.
    Take notice that, on September 26, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets proposed to be effective 
October 27, 1997:

Third Revised Sheet No. 1
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 2
Third Revised Sheet No. 49
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 120
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 121
First Revised Sheet No. 122A
Third Revised Sheet No. 132
Original Revised Sheet No. 137A
Second Revised Sheet No. 187A
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 191

    ANR states that the purpose of this filing is to make a revision to 
a provision of ANR's tariff in light of a recent clarification granted 
by the Commission related to a Gas Industry Standards Board (GISB) 
standard regarding the delivery point-allocation methodology, as well 
as to make a number of ministerial corrections, of errors that ANR has 
discovered in its tariff.
    ANR states that copies of the filing have been mailed to all its 
Second Revised Volume No. 1 customers and state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commissions 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not served to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding.
    Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public

[[Page 52328]]

inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Chasell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26487 Filed 10-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 15, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00503

- CV

IN RE ESTATE OF RAMIRO AGUILAR JR., DECEASED

,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PC

- 2800

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellants’ brief was due November 14, 2016. Appellants have filed an unopposed

extension of time, asking for an additional forty

- five days to file their brief. After review, we

GRANT appellants’ motion and ORDER appellants to file their brief on or before December

29, 2016.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the s eal of the said

court on this 15th day of November, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
##### 



Exhibit 32
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1)
    
    The report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m); and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
  / S / Robert J. AtteaRobert J. Attea
Chairman of the Board
Chief Executive Officer/ S / David L. RogersDavid L. Rogers
Chief Financial Officer 1
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.36
                                  EXHIBIT A-4
                                  -----------

                      AMENDED AND RESTATED TERM-LINE NOTE
                      -----------------------------------

$30,000,000                                                     January 31, 1997


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, MATRIX FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION, an Arizona
corporation ("BORROWER"), promises to pay to the order of BANK ONE, TEXAS, N.A.
("LENDER"), that portion of the principal amount of $30,000,000 that may from
time to time be disbursed and outstanding under this note together with
interest.

     This note is a "Term-Line Note" under the Amended and Restated Loan
Agreement (as renewed, extended, amended, or restated, the "LOAN AGREEMENT")
dated as of January 31, 1997, between Borrower, Lender, certain other Lenders,
and Bank One, Texas, N.A., as Agent for Lenders.  All of the defined terms in
the Loan Agreement have the same meanings when used -- unless otherwise defined
-- in this note.

     This note incorporates by reference the principal and interest payment
terms in the Loan Agreement for this note, including, without limitation, the
final maturity.  Principal and interest are payable to the holder of this note
through Agent at either (a) its offices at 1717 Main Street, Dallas, Texas
75201, or (b) at any other address so designated by Agent in written notice to
Borrower.

     This note incorporates by reference all other provisions in the Loan
Agreement applicable to this note -- such as provisions for disbursements of
principal, applicable-interest rates before and after Default, voluntary and
mandatory prepayments, acceleration of maturity, exercise of Rights, payment of
attorneys' fees, court costs, and other costs of collection, certain waivers by
Borrower and other obligors, assurances and security, choice of Texas and United
States federal Law, usury savings, and other matters applicable to Loan
Documents under the Loan Agreement.

     This note is an amendment, restatement, renewal, extension, modification
of, consolidation of, and substitution for, the existing Term-Line Notes (as the
same may have been amended and replaced to the date hereof, the "FORMER NOTES"),
which Former Notes were executed and delivered pursuant to the Existing Loan
Agreement.


                              MATRIX FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION,
                              as Borrower


                              By    ____________________________________________
                                    Thomas J. Osselaer, Executive Vice President

                                                                     EXHIBIT A-4
                                                                     -----------
#### Siegfried H. BOCKHOLD, Harold J. Bockhold, and Lillian M. Bockhold, d/b/a Florida Mortgage Center, Appellants, v. The COBBS COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-329.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 21, 1969.

Sandler & Sandler, Miami, for appellants.

Fowler, White, Collins, Gillen, Humkey *&*Trenam, and Michael J. Cappucio, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Edwards v. Trulis, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 893.
EXHIBIT (32) (B)

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of United Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brenda M.
Hudson-Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Brenda M. Hudson-Nelson

Brenda M. Hudson-Nelson
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2006
#### Joe Louis LUKES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-319.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 23, 1970.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

*8PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Williams v. State (Fla.1969), 228 So.2d 377; Leach v. State (Fla.1961), 132 So.2d 329; Kitchen v. State (Fla.1956), 89 So.2d 667.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  (in thousands)
 Years Ended December 31,2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001Earnings:Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes and
minority interests
    
    $
    9,347
    
    
    $
    5,128
    
    
    $
    (1,769
    )
    
    $
    655
    
    
    $
    318Plus: Fixed charges
    
    
    29,452
    
    
    
    7,474
    
    
    
    5,579
    
    
    
    7,449
    
    
    
    1,440Plus: Interest expense capitalized
    
    
    (193
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Less: Minority interests in pretax
income from continuing operations with
no incurred fixed charges
    
    
    (140
    )
    
    
    (95
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Earnings
(loss) from continuing
operations, adjusted
    
    $
    38,466
    
    
    $
    12,507
    
    
    $
    3,810
    
    
    $
    8,104
    
    
    $
    1,758Fixed Charges:Interest and debt amortization expensed
and capitalized
    
    $
    28,702
    
    
    $
    7,068
    
    
    $
    5,287
    
    
    $
    7,080
    
    
    $
    1,185Estimated interest within rental expense
    
    
    750
    
    
    
    406
    
    
    
    292
    
    
    
    369
    
    
    
    255Total fixed charges
    
    $
    29,452
    
    
    $
    7,474
    
    
    $
    5,579
    
    
    $
    7,449
    
    
    $
    1,440Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.31
    
    
    
    1.67
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.09
    
    
    
    1.22Shortfall
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (1,769
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FREEMAN HARDWICK, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 04-310 Erie

v. )

)

SUPERINTENDENT BROOKS, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on

October 20, 2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise

Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on March 7, 2006,

recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed and a certificate

of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of

service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail at SCI

Albion, where he is incarcerated, and on Respondent. Petitioner has filed no objections

to Magistrate Judge Baxter’s Report and Recommendation. After de novo review of the

petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the

following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2006,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is 

DISMISSED and that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on

March 7, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:04-cv-00310-SJM-SPB Document 11 Filed 03/27/06 Page 1 of 1
#### Elizabeth Burges ROWE, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA SUN PRINTING et al., Respondents.

No. 40628.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 25, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
April 15, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Delivery of Revised Phoenix Air UNMANNED, LLC UAS Operations Manual

in Support of Amendment to Exemption No. 11241(Docket No. FAA-2014-

0692)

To Whom it May Concern:

As you are aware, this office represents Phoenix Air UNMANNED, LLC ("Phoenix Air") 

regarding the above-referenced Petition for Exemption, in which Phoenix Air seeks regulatory 

relief to allow commercial operation of small unmanned aircraft system. Please accept this letter 

as confirmation that a revised Phoenix Air UAS Operations Manual, which contains proprietary 

information, was hand-delivered to Jake J. Troutman, Program Analyst, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Office of Aviation Safety, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division, on April 15, 

2015. 

If you have any other questions, or need any additional information to process the petition 

to amend Exemption No. 11241, please do not hesitate to contact us. 

Very truly yours, 

Matthew J. Clark

Mark E. McKinnon 

 

Counsel for Phoenix Air UNMANNED, LLC

Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York

1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

Tel: 703.336.8800

mckennalong.com

Northern Virginia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

Mark E. McKinnon

703.336.8714

Matthew J. Clark

703.336.8714

Email Address

mmckinnon@mckennalong.com

mclark@mckennalong.com
```

[113th Congress Public Law 30]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 127 STAT. 510]]

Public Law 113-30
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify requirements relating 
  to the availability of pipeline safety regulatory documents, and for 
         other purposes. <<NOTE: Aug. 9, 2013 -  [H.R. 2576]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF PIPELINE SAFETY REGULATORY DOCUMENTS.

    Section 60102(p) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``1 year'' and inserting ``3 years'';
            (2) by striking ``guidance or''; and
            (3) by striking ``, on an Internet Web site''.

    Approved August 9, 2013.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2576:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113-
153, Pt. 1 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013):
            July 16, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
## **EXHIBIT 32**

### **INSWEB CORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of InsWeb Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of theundersigned, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to InsWeb Corporation, and will beretained by InsWeb Corporation and furnished to the Securities ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
| **/s/ HUSSEIN A. ENAN**              | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------|------------|
| Hussein A. Enan                      |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| Dated: August 9, 2006                |
|                                 |
|                                 |
| **/s/ WILLIAM D.GRIFFIN**            | ** ** |
| William D. Griffin                   |
| Chief Financial Officer              |
| Dated : August 9, 2006               |

 

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR




RULE
      15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Pangea Petroleum Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
      B. Pollock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
              May 15,
              2007
            
            By:
            /s/
              Charles B.
              PollockCharles
                B. PollockChief
                Executive Officer
Case 1:05-cv-00047-MBC-SPB Document 5 Filed 06/17/05 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:05-cv-00047-MBC-SPB Document 5 Filed 06/17/05 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:05-cv-00047-MBC-SPB Document 5 Filed 06/17/05 Page 3 of 3
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2949 

To require the Secretary of Defense to complete a data matching agreement 

with the Secretary of Education in order to ensure individuals who 

are current or former active-duty military service members or civilian 

employees and are otherwise eligible for assistance under the public 

service loan forgiveness program have their periods of employment automatically certified and counted towards the public service loan forgiveness 

program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO (for herself and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to complete a data 

matching agreement with the Secretary of Education 

in order to ensure individuals who are current or former 

active-duty military service members or civilian employees 

and are otherwise eligible for assistance under the public 

service loan forgiveness program have their periods of 

employment automatically certified and counted towards 

the public service loan forgiveness program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2949 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Military Ac3 cess to Higher Education Benefits Act of 2023’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DATA MATCHING AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPART5 MENT OF EDUCATION. 

6 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

7 of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall complete a data 

8 matching agreement with the Secretary of Education in 

9 order to ensure that individuals who are current or former 

10 active-duty military service members or civilian employees 

11 and are otherwise eligible for assistance under the public 

12 service loan forgiveness program under section 455(m) of 

13 the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)) 

14 have their periods of employment, beginning on October 

15 1, 2007, automatically certified and counted towards the 

16 public service loan forgiveness program. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of RPM Advantage, Inc.
(the "Registrant") for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David R. Pressler, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Date:   July 15, 2011

By:

/s/ David R. Pressler


David R. Pressler
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smith Barney Principal PLUS Futures Fund
L.P. (the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, David J. Vogel, President of Smith Barney Futures Management LLC,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.

/s/ David J. Vogel
    David J. Vogel
    Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
    Chief Executive Officer
    March 27, 2003