alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[104th Congress Public Law 148]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ148.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 1378]]

  
  
  
Public Law 104-148
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire property in the 
  town of East Hampton, Suffolk County, New York, for inclusion in the 
   Amagansett National Wildlife Refuge. <<NOTE: May 24, 1996 -  [H.R. 
                                1836]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 16 USC 668dd note.>>  AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY 
            FOR INCLUSION IN THE AMAGANSETT NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

    (a) Authority to Acquire Property.--The Secretary of the Interior 
may acquire, for inclusion in the Amagansett National Wildlife Refuge, 
the area known as the Shadmoor Parcel, consisting of approximately 98 
acres (as determined by the Secretary) located along the Atlantic Ocean 
adjacent to municipal park land in the town of East Hampton, Suffolk 
County, New York.
    (b) Management of Acquired Interests.--Lands and interests acquired 
by the United States under this section shall be managed by the 
Secretary of the Interior as part of the Amagansett National Wildlife 
Refuge.

SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 16 USC 3503 note.>>  CORRECTIONS TO COASTAL BARRIER 
            RESOURCES MAP.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall make such corrections 
to the map described in subsection (b) as are necessary--
            (1) to move the eastern boundary of the excluded area 
        covering Ocean Beach, Seaview, Ocean Bay Park, and part of Point 
        O'Woods to the western boundary of the Sunken Forest Preserve; 
        and
            (2) to ensure that the depiction of areas as ``otherwise 
        protected areas'' does not include any area that is owned by the 
        Point O'Woods Association (a privately held corporation under 
        the laws of the State of New York).

    (b) Map Described.--The map described in this subsection is the map 
that is included in a set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources 
System'', dated October 24, 1990, that relates to the unit of the 
Coastal Barrier Resources System entitled ``Fire Island Unit NY-59P''.

    Approved May 24, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1836 (S. 1422):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-529 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 104-255 accompanying S. 1422 (Comm. on Environment 
and Public Works).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 142 (1996):
            Apr. 23, considered and passed House.
            May 3, considered and passed Senate, amended.
            May 14, House concurred in Senate amendment.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer*

I, Brian J. Berchtold, the Chief
Executive Officer of ALCiS Health, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), certify pursuant to section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | Amendment One to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2007 (the Amendment), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), whichever is applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Amendment fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                              
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: July 29, 2007
|                     | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ BRIAN J BERCHTOLD        
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

---

|* | The material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



19
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

QUANDA SIMONE BROWN,

NO. 3:15-CV-01820

(JUDGE CAPUTO)

(MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCHWAB)

Plaintiff,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AS 

SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO 

LASALLE BANK N.A. AS TRUSTEE 

FOR CERTIFICATE-HOLDERS OF

BEAR STEARNS ASSET-BACKED

SECURITIES I LLC, ASSET-BACKED 

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-HE 2,

Defendants.

 

ORDER

NOW, this 9th day of September, 2016, upon review of the Report and

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Schwab (Doc. 29) for plain error or manifest

injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29) is ADOPTED in its entirety. 

(2) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 15) is

GRANTED.

(3) Plaintiff will be given thirty (30) days leave to file a second amended

complaint, if appropriate, to state a FDCPA claim that falls within the statute

of limitations and that states a claim upon which relief can plausibly be

granted. If Plaintiff fails to do so, the action will be dismissed with prejudice

and the case will be closed; and

(3) The matter is RECOMMITTED to Magistrate Judge Schwab for further

proceedings.

 /s/ A. Richard Caputo 

 A. Richard Caputo

 United States District Judge

Case 3:15-cv-01820-ARC Document 30 Filed 09/09/16 Page 1 of 1
USGS CMG OVERVIEW LOG

ACTIVITY ID: 99FGS01

TOPIC INFORMATION

USGS ACTIVITY ID 99FGS01

OTHER ID (IF ANY)

ORGANIZATION U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine 

Science Center and Florida Geological Survey

PROJECT

AREAS OF OPERATION Atlantic Ocean (Orchid to Jupiter, FL)

CHIEF SCIENTIST(S) Henry Freedenberg

INFORMATION

SPECIALIST(S) Dana S. Wiese and Arnell S. Forde

ACTIVITY TYPE Geophysical Survey (high-resolution seismic)

SCIENTIFIC

PURPOSE/GOALS Subsurface Characterization

PLATFORM R/V Geoquest

STARTING DATE July 19, 1999

STARTING PORT Stuart, Florida

ENDING DATE July 26, 1999 

ENDING PORT Sebastian Inlet, Florida

EQUIPMENT USED

Boomer System (Applied Acoustic CSP 300 power supply, 

Huntec plate, and Innovative Transducer Inc. (ITI) ST-5 10-

channel hydrophones), Triton Elics International (TEI) Delph 

Seismic acquisition software version 1.36, and Trimble 

Centurion GPS (running Fugawi software) navigation system

with trim_rmc.pln navigation driver.

INFORMATION 

TO BE DERIVED (GRAIN SIZE, DEPTH 

TO BASEMENT)

Shallow geologic framework - subbottom image profiles.

SUMMARY OF ACTIVITY

AND DATA GATHERED

A total of 28 boomer 2-D lines were collected. Additionally, 9 

chirp lines were collected during 99FGS01 but due to poor 

quality, these lines are not being archived.

NOTES

Digital 99FGS01 logs were generated by 

A. Forde in June 2012 using the handwritten logs and personal 

accounts of the crew members.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Hooker Furniture Corporation (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:






a.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





b.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  June 9, 2010


By: /s/ Paul B. Toms, Jr.


Paul B. Toms, Jr.


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




By: /s/ E. Larry Ryder


E. Larry Ryder


Executive Vice President - Finance and


Administration and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                 POWER OF ATTORNEY

          The undersigned officer and/or director of EMERGING ALPHA CORPORATION,
a Delaware  corporation  (the  "Corporation"),  hereby  constitutes and appoints
Jerry W.  Jarrell and D.B.H.  Chaffe III,  and each of them,  with full power of
substitution and resubstitution,  as attorney to sign for the undersigned in any
and all capacities the  Corporation's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended March 31, 1999 and any and all amendments thereto, with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission and with full power and authority to do and perform any and
all  acts  and  things  whatsoever  required  and  necessary  to be  done in the
premises,  as fully to all intents and purposes as the  undersigned  could do if
personally  present.  The undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said
attorney-in-fact  and  agent,  or any  of his  substitute  or  substitutes,  may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof and incorporate such changes as
any of the said attorneys-in-fact deems appropriate.




Burt H. Keenan

June 17, 1999




<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.17

                                Agreement Between

                              NUYTC0 RESEARCH LTD.

                                       AND

                     HYPERSTEALTH BIOTECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

NUYTCO  will, for a fee, carry out the necessary engineering design work for a 6
place  + 1 attendant cylindrical Acrylic patient area Hyperbaric Chamber, with &
steel  double  lock  exit  and  entry  area,  and  all the necessary operational
fittings,  controls,  and  safety  equipment.

NUYTCO  will,  for a fee, provide the necessary fabrication drawings, to include
electrical  and  mechanical,  end  a  cost  estimate for completion of the first
prototype  operational  chamber that will be able to pass insurance regulations,
Included  will  be  the  additional  drawings etc. to provide the ability to add
another  section  to  offer  a  12  place  capacity.

NUYTCO will, for a fee, service, oversee, manage, all fabrication, assembly, and
testing  of  the  first
prototype  chamber.

NUYTCO will be called upon from time to time for a fixed fee, or hourly rate, to
assist  in  necessary
changes,  upgrades,  or  an),  required  new  designs  or  changes.

HYPERSTEALTH  agrees  to  abide  by  NUYTCO's  directions,  as long as NUYTCO is
associated with the project, to honor all financial contracts and agreements, to
provide  all  the  necessary  input  into  operational  requirements  and safety
conditions,  to  avoid  disclosure  of  Engineering  designs deemed to be NUYTCO
proprietary or patentable, and will not discuss and design parameters with third
panics  unless  permission  has  been  granted  by  NUYTCO,

Proprietary designs shall be held to be the Property of the designers - transfer
of  patents  or  patent
application  rights  to  HYPERSTEALTH  by  NUYTCO  to  be subject to negotiation
between  the
parties  as  to  price,  royalties,  etc.

     Signed:  "Phil  Nuytten"            Date:  June,l6/99

     Per:  Nuytco  Research  Ltd.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

LOUIS ALEXANDER HAIRSTON, \ 

Petitioner, I Civil Action No. 05-24 Erie 

I 

DAVID KATZ, Michigan 

De artment of Corrections and 

W A) RDEN JAMES SHERMAN, 

Respondents. I 

MEMORANDUM ORDER 

This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on 

January 24, 2006 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise 

Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 

U.S.C. fj 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on January 20, 2006, 

recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for failure to 

prosecute. The parties were allowed ten (1 0) days from the date of service to file 

objections. Service was made on Petitioner through his court-appointed counsel of 

record. Petitioner has filed no objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report and 

Recommendation. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, 

together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered: 

AND NOW, this gth day of February, 2006, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is 

DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. 

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, 'Filed on 

January 20, 2006 [Doc. # 151, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. 

S/ Sean J. McLaughlin United States District Judge 

cm: All counsel of record 

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:05-cv-00024-SJM-SPB Document 16 Filed 02/09/06 Page 1 of 1
September 15, 2015

Mr. Michael Osburn

Chief Operating Officer

Nephos Services LLC

Dear Mr. Osburn :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

§ § 45.29, 61.113, 91.9, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151, 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405, 91.407, 91.409,

and part 21, Subpart H, of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why

we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your June 8, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Nephos Services LLC filed in

D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2549 , but we are unable to process your req uest any further. Your

petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider

the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition /index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must subm it the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
<Page>



EXHIBIT 99.1

                           VION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this amendment to the Annual Report of Vion Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Alan Kessman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: July 18, 2003

/s/ Alan Kessman
----------------
Alan Kessman
President and Chief Executive Officer



                                      1
#### Leland D. WATSON and Dorothy I. Watson, his wife, Appellants, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION and Polk County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 69-538.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 3, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 4, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,221
<SECURITIES>                                    40,118
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,404
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (167)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,567
<PP&E>                                          14,917
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,394)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,555
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,660
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,747
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                65,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   103
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  53
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (43,127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (43,127)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (43,127)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.23)


</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cv-00220-MBC-SPB Document 18 Filed 06/11/07 Page 1 of 2Case 1:06-cv-00220-MBC-SPB Document 18 Filed 06/11/07 Page 2 of 2
## February 2011


# Emission Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries

Version 2.1 ICR Response Version

Submitted to:

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Submitted by:

RTI International
3040 Cornwallis Road Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194

### Version 2.1 Final ICR Draft Appendix A—Average Stream Compositions



# Appendix A

Average Stream Compositions

### Version 2.1 Final ICR Draft Appendix A—Average Stream Compositions

Table A-1. Refinery Average Stream Hazardou s Air Pollutant Compositions—Default Values

Average Weight Percent of Compound in Process Unit Stream a1,3-Butadiene106-99-0n-Hexane110-54-32,2,4-Trimethylpentane540-84-1Benzene71-43-2Toluene108-88-3Xylenes (total)1330-20-7Ethylbenzene100-41-4Cumene98-82-81,2,4-trimethylbenzeneb95-63-6Naphthalene91-20-3Biphenyl92-52-4Styrene100-42-5

Process Units

Atmospheric Distillation 0.01 4.28 0.05 0.86 1.7 1.97 0.63 0.12 0.63 0.25 0.06 0.001

Vacuum Distillation - 0. 007 0.004 0.004 0.043 0.020 0.024 0.001 0.020 0.12 0.09 - Coking Unit 0.04 2.49 0.75 0.42 1. 30 1.76 0.70 0.12 0.70 0.28 0.001 0.19
Cat Hydrocracker 0.03 1.86 1.04 1.27 2.72 2.67 1.02 0.09 1. 33 0.20 0.001 0.19

FCCU 0.01 0.99 0.29 1.03 3.28 4. 90 1.07 0.10 1.92 0.72 0.43 0.14

CRU 0.009 2.75 0.25 6.34 17.44 17. 61 3.88 0.42 5.93 0.87 0.001 0.11
Hydrodesulfurization - 1.89 0.0001 0.37 1.72 1.94 0.37 0.07 0.40 0.25 0.22 - Alkylation 0.22 1.57 25. 24 0.03 2.05 0.08 5.0E-5 5.0E-5 5.0E-5 5.0E-5 5.0E-5 0.02

Isomerization - 3.22 0.01 0.51 0.64 0.15 - - - - - - Polymerization - 0.54 0.73 1.24 1.76 1.18 0.09 - - - -
Products

Aromatics Extract -
Benzene - - - 99.99 0.009 0.002 - - - - - -
Aromatics Extract -
Toluene - - - 0.296 95.61 3.49 2.82 - 0.3 - - -
Aromatics Extract - Xylenes - - - - - 77.89 16.08 0.59 - - - -
Aromatics Extract - Heavy Aromatics - - - 5.7 19.36 25.03 3.56 0.965 4.94 0.314 - -
Commercial Jet Fuel - 1.68 0.0006 0. 577 0.965 1.22 0.257 0.106 0.815 0.627 0.409 -
Conventional Gasoline 0.0009 2.22 2.94 1.4 c 7.75 6.56 1.490 0.219 3. 002 0.415 - 0.0767

Aviation Gasoline - 2.30 - 1. 01 7.69 3.37 1.2 0. 103 0.5 0.695 - -
Reformulated Gasoline - 1.36 1.10 0.8 c 7 7.31 1.26 0.19 2.52 0.21 - -
Diesel Fuel - 0.030 0.007 0.004 0.081 0.241 0.053 0.056 0.349 0.285 0.117 - Home Heating Oil - - - - 0.108 0.300 0.095 - 0.429 0.453 0.181 -
Solvent-refined Lubes - - - - - - - - - - - -

Crude Oil 9.81E05 1.341 0.185 0.312 0.542 0.811 0.186 0.108 0.377 0.139 0.030

a 

### Based on Petroleum Environmental Re search Forum (PERF) refinery proce ss stream speciation study (API, 2002),

unless otherwise specified.

b 

### 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene is not a HAP, but it is a prevalent VOC in many refinery streams.

c 

### Average benzene content of conventional and reformulated gasoline based on Fuel Trends Resport: Gasoline

1995-2005 (U.S. EPA. Report No. EPA420-R-08-002. January 2008), corrected to weight percent using the density correction factor of 0.876/0.739 (i.e., 1.16vol%×0.876/0.739 = 1.4wt%; 0.67vol%×0.876/0.739 = 0.8wt%).