alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                           1,868
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      823
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (46)
<INVENTORY>                                        998
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   892
<PP&E>                                             963
<DEPRECIATION>                                     420
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              972
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,153
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,785)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,521
<SALES>                                          6,073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,073
<CGS>                                            3,038
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,830
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    26
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 171
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,598)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,599)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,599)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.82)
        

</TABLE>
Opinion issued July 25, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00915-CV

———————————

RONALD DARNELL CEPHUS JUNIOR, Appellant

V.

KELLI DIANE JOHNSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 164th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-36879

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). 

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. 
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Hightower.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26410]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection 
Requests

    This notice lists information collection packages that will require 
submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), in compliance 
with Pub. L. 104-13 effective October 1, 1995, The Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995.
    1. Disability Report--0960-0141. The information collected on Form 
SSA-3368-BK is needed for the determination of disability by the State 
Disability Determination Services. This version of the form will be 
used in those SSA offices and State DDS offices that are piloting SSA's 
Reengineered Disability System. The information will be used to develop 
medical evidence and to assess the alleged disability. The respondents 
are applicants for disability benefits.
    Number of Respondents: 36,500.
    Frequency of Response: 1.
    Average Burden Per Response: 30 minutes.
    Estimated annual Burden: 18,250 hours.
    2. Pain Report--Child--0960-0540. The information collected on form 
SSA-3371-BK by the Social Security Administration is used to make a 
determination of disability for a child under the title XVI program. 
This information is essential to the adjudication of a claim. The 
respondents are applicants for title XVI child disability benefits.
    Number of Respondents: 250,000.
    Frequency of Response: 1.
    Average Burden Per Response: 15 minutes.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 62,500 hours.
    Written comments and recommendations regarding the information 
collection(s) should be sent within 60 days from the date of this 
publication, directly to the SSA Reports Clearance Officer at the 
following address: Social Security Administration, DCFAM, Attn: 
Nicholas E. Tagliareni, 6401 Security Blvd., 1-A-21 Operations Bldg., 
Baltimore, MD 21235.
    In addition to your comments on the accuracy of the Agency's burden 
estimate, we are soliciting comments on the need for the information; 
its practical utility; ways to enhance its quality, utility and 
clarity; and on ways to minimize burden on respondents, including the 
use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.
    To receive a copy of any of the forms or clearance packages, call 
the SSA Reports Clearance Officer on (410) 965-4125 or write to him at 
the address listed above.

    Dated: September 30, 1997.
Nicholas E. Tagliareni,
Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-26410 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4190-29-P
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6107

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JEAN PAUL ALVARADO , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Harrisonburg

. Michael F. Urbanski , Chief District Judge. ( 5:12

- cr - 00030

- MFU

- 1; 5:17

- cv - 81250

- MFU

- RSB )

Submitted : May 31, 2019 Decided: June 14, 2019

Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Jean Paul Alvarado, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTOR NEY, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jean Paul Alvarado seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. M cDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the mo tion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Alvarado has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabili ty and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26240]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[NM-070-1220-00]


Restrictions on Public Land; San Juan, Rio Arriba and Sandoval 
Counties, New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of use restrictions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In order to reduce the impacts to various resources caused by 
the high number of open roads and the use of off-highway vehicles in 
the Farmington District, use restrictions are announced by the 
Farmington District. Effective immediately, vehicle travel is limited 
to designated roads and trails within the 13 Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) 
management units designated in the Farmington Proposed Resource 
Management Plan Amendment/Environmental Assessment Off-Highway Vehicle 
Use, as specified in the Decision Record which was approved in July of 
1995. The 13 management units include a total of almost 500,000 acres 
of public land.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John Hansen, BLM Farmington District Office, 1235 La Plata Highway, 
Suite A, Farmington, NM 87401; 505-599-6325.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Resource Management Plan Amendment 
(RMPA) was completed and approved with extensive public involvement. 
The purpose of the amendment was to protect resource values such as 
wildlife habitat, soil, cultural sites and threatened and endangered 
species. The management units are listed below,

1. Tank Mountain/Pump Canyon
2. Middle Mesa
3. Rosa Mesa
4. Sims Mesa
5. Laguna Seca
6. Largo/Carrizo
7. Gallo Canyon
8. North Huerfano
9. Pinon Mesa
10. Kiffen Canyon
11. Manzanares Mesa
12. Blanco Mesa
13. Rincon Largo

    A map showing the specific location of the management units is 
available for viewing at the Farmington District Office located in 
Farmington, New Mexico at 1235 La Plata Highway.
    Off Highway Vehicle management plans will be written for each of 
the management units as funding and personnel allow. Closures will be 
enforced as signing is completed. The management plan for the Rosa Mesa 
area was completed in June of 1996.
    Authority for these closures is found in 43 CFR part 8364. Any 
person who fails to comply with a closure issued under 43 CFR part 8364 
may be subject to the penalties provided in 43 CFR 8360.0-7: violations 
are punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000 and/or imprisonment not 
to exceed 12 months.
Lee Otteni,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-26240 Filed 10-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
Opinion issued August 7, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00491-CR

———————————

IN RE RONALD WAYNE SCHOFIELD, Relator

On Appeal from the 239th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 34910

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Ronald Wayne Schofield, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, 

challenging the trial court’s order denying his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc.

1

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

 1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Ronald Wayne Schofield, cause 

number 34910, in the 239th District Court of Brazoria County, Texas, the Hon. 

Patrick Sebesta presiding.
2

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
1The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation recommends that Defendants’

Motion to Dismiss be granted. However, it is clear that Document Number 44 is a Motion for

Summary Judgment, and the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation reflects that she

addressed the Motion for Summary Judgement. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ABUBAKA HAQQ, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 03-277 Erie

)

WILLIAM WOLFE, et al., ) 

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on August 29, 2003, 

and was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and

recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules

72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, filed on July 26, 2005, [Doc. No. 59]

recommended that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 44] be granted.1 The

parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made

on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. Plaintiff filed objections on August 9, 2005

[Doc. No. 60]. After de novo review of the case, together with the report and recommendation,

and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 16th day of August, 2005,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc.

No. 44] is GRANTED. 

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated July 26, 2005, is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Case 1:03-cv-00277-SJM-SPB Document 61 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 2
2

The clerk is directed to mark the case closed.

s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: All parties of record. 

Case 1:03-cv-00277-SJM-SPB Document 61 Filed 08/16/05 Page 2 of 2
109 STAT. 264 PUBLIC LAW 104–26—SEPT. 6, 1995

Public Law 104–26

104th Congress

An Act

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt employees who perform

certain court reporting duties from the compensatory time requirements applicable

to certain public agencies, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Court Reporter Fair Labor

Amendments of 1995’’.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON OVERTIME COMPENSATION FOR COURT

REPORTERS.

Section 7(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C.

207(o)) is amended—

(1) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and

(2) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following new paragraph:

‘‘(6) The hours an employee of a public agency performs court

reporting transcript preparation duties shall not be considered as

hours worked for the purposes of subsection (a) if—

‘‘(A) such employee is paid at a per-page rate which is

not less than—

‘‘(i) the maximum rate established by State law or

local ordinance for the jurisdiction of such public agency,

‘‘(ii) the maximum rate otherwise established by a

judicial or administrative officer and in effect on July 1,

1995, or

‘‘(iii) the rate freely negotiated between the employee

and the party requesting the transcript, other than the

judge who presided over the proceedings being transcribed,

and

‘‘(B) the hours spent performing such duties are outside

of the hours such employee performs other work (including

hours for which the agency requires the employee’s attendance)

pursuant to the employment relationship with such public

agency.

For purposes of this section, the amount paid such employee in

accordance with subparagraph (A) for the performance of court

reporting transcript preparation duties, shall not be considered

in the calculation of the regular rate at which such employee

is employed.’’.

29 USC 201 note.

Court Reporter

Fair Labor

Amendments of

1995.

Sept. 6, 1995

[H.R. 1225]
PUBLIC LAW 104–26—SEPT. 6, 1995 109 STAT. 265

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1225:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–219 (Comm. on Economic and Educational Opportunities).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):

Aug. 1, considered and passed House.

Aug. 5, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

The amendments made by section 2 shall apply after the date

of the enactment of this Act and with respect to actions brought

in a court after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Approved September 6, 1995.

29 USC 207 note.
Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- Agreement dated January 25, 2002


  
 EXHIBIT 10.13 
  
 ACTION BY UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT 
 OF THE 
 COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE 
 OF 
 NETIQ CORPORATION 
  

Effective as of January 25, 2002 
  
 In accordance with Section
141(f) of the Delaware General Corporation Law and Sections 3.12 and 4.3 of the Bylaws of NetIQ Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), the undersigned, constituting all of the members of the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”), hereby adopt the following resolutions, effective as of the date written above: 
  
 Agreement with Ching-Fa Hwang 
  
 WHEREAS, the Committee and Ching-Fa Hwang (the “Executive”) have
reached an understanding whereby, after the appointment of a new Chief Executive Officer, the Executive will remain employed by the Company through at least June 30, 2002 (the “Initial Period”) to support the transition of the new Chief
Executive Officer. 
  
 RESOLVED, that through the Initial Period, the Executive will continue to receive a base salary at a rate
equal to his current base salary in effect on the date hereof and his executive bonus as in effect on the date hereof. 
  
 RESOLVED, that until the end of the Initial Period, the Executive’s options to purchase common stock of the Company (the “Options”) granted under the Company’s stock incentive plan (the “Plan”) will continue to
vest in accordance with the Plan or the applicable option agreement. 
  
 RESOLVED, that at the end of the Initial Period, the
Executive’s unvested Options will become immediately vested and exercisable. 
  
 RESOLVED, that the Executive’s Options
that have an exercise price higher than the closing price of the Company’s stock as of the date hereof (“Underwater Options”) shall remain exercisable until the third anniversary of the last day of the Initial Period. 

 
 RESOLVED, that all Options, other than the Underwater Options, shall remain exercisable for the period specified in the Plan or the
applicable option agreement and, if not exercised by the end of such period, shall be forfeited and cancelled in accordance with the terms of the Plan. 
  
 RESOLVED, that while the Executive remains a member of the Board, he will be entitled to participate in all health and medical benefit plans of the Company for which the Executive was eligible on the date hereof, or
comparable coverage, until comparable health insurance coverage is available to the Executive in connection with subsequent employment. 
  
 
	 
	  	 	 /S/    ALAN W. KAUFMAN
 
Alan W. Kaufman
 
	 
	  	 	 /S/    SCOTT D. SANDELL
 
Scott D. Sandell
 
	 
	  	 	 /S/    YING-HON WONG
 
Ying-Hon Wong
#### The STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, etc., Petitioner, v. George A. WALTERS and Myrtle H. Walters, his wife, Respondents.

No. 40390.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 10, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., dissents.
Defendants request “a complete copy of the entire Case File Record(s), in its

1

entirety, including all filings, all exhibits, for all parties,” (Doc. 365 at 2), “a complete

copy of the ‘Clerks Record,’ including all Clerk’s Case Notes and all In Chambers

Notes, Transcripts, in their entirety,” (id.), “a complete copy of the ‘Judges Notes,’

both hand written and in the computers or other Digital or Electronic Database . . .

which the judges may have or use,” (id.), “all records . . . for any and all In

Chambers Meetings or Hearings, Ex Parte Meetings or Hearings, or DOD

Directives, Presidential Directive, or the like[,]” (id.), “all . . . communications from

or pertaining to, Judge James F. McClure, as to the transferring of this case to

Judge Christopher Conn[e]r[,]” (id.), “all Case File Records, pertaining to the

‘recusal’ of Judge James F. McClure,” (id. at 3), and “all other communications from

all and every single other Agency, Department, Committee, Group, Institution,

Corporation, Organization and Association,” (id.).

The court notes that some of the documents identified above—for instance,

all filings, all trial exhibits, and all transcripts—have already been provided or made

available to the defendants. With respect to such documents, defendants’ request

(Doc. 365) shall be denied as moot. With respect to the other documents described

by defendants, the undersigned knows of no such relevant documents or records

subject to disclosure, and therefore, the request (Doc. 365) must be denied.

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 4:07-CR-0422

:

v. : (Judge Conner)

:

ALBERT LEO BERRETTINI, JR., :

and MARY ANN BERRETTINI, :

:

Defendants :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2010, upon consideration of defendants’

joint filing (Doc. 365) captioned “Request and Demand for Clerks Record and

Request and Demand for All Judges Records,” and it appearing that defendants

request a variety of documents, and the court concluding that defendants have 1

Case 4:07-cr-00422-CCC Document 371 Filed 05/11/10 Page 1 of 2
failed to establish any entitlement to the relief they seek, it is hereby ORDERED

that defendants’ request (Doc. 365) is DENIED.

 S/ Christopher C. Conner 

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge

Case 4:07-cr-00422-CCC Document 371 Filed 05/11/10 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000904973
<NAME> GENZYME TRANSGENICS CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                           6,383
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (390)
<INVENTORY>                                        678
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,400
<PP&E>                                          32,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,609)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  70,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,823
<BONDS>                                          9,862
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    70,980
<SALES>                                         62,938
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,938
<CGS>                                           54,829
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (186)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,295)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        48
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,343)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,343)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.54)<F1>
<FN><F1> PER SHARE AMOUNTS HAVE BEEN RESTATED TO REFLECT ADOPTION OF SFAS 128. 
HOWEVER, DUE TO THE COMPANY'S NET LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS AND NET LOSS
FOR THE 3 FISCAL YEARS TO THE PERIOD ENDED DEC. 28, 1997, EARNINGS PER SHARE 
HAVE NOT CHANGED AND, THEREFORE, RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULES WILL NOT BE 
SUBMITTED.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>