alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              THIS   SCHEDULE    CONTAINS   SUMMARY    FINANCIAL
                              INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S  
                              CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEEMENTS FOR
                              THE TWELVE  MONTHS  ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
                              QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         43,313
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,053,102
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,332,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    2,379,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,378,504
<PP&E>                                         18,594,211
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,596,468)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 28,371,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,694,319
<BONDS>                                        5,413,818
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       55,488
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,884,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   28,371,541
<SALES>                                        58,881,533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               58,881,533
<CGS>                                          43,082,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  43,082,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               402,470
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             633,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,765,427
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,901,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,864,427
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,864,427
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.52
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 


FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 


KELLEY TROY COOLEY, ) 


Plaintiff, ) 

v. ) C.A. No. 06-178 ERIE 

) 

COUNTY EXECUTIVE MARK DIVECCHIO, ) 

et ai, ) 

Defendants. ) 

MEMORANDUM ORDER 

Plaintiffs complaint was received by the Clerk ofCourt on August 9,2006, and was referred 

to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the 

Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.c. § 636(b)(l), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.104 ofthe Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on November 12, 2009, 

recommended that the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Erie County (Doc. # 116) be granted. 

The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date ofservice to file objections. Objections were filed by the 

Plaintiff on December 11,2009. After de novo review ofthe pleadings and documents in the case, together with 

the report and recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered: 

AND NOW, this~~yofJanuary, 2010; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Erie 

County (Document #116) is GRANTED. 

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated November 12, 2009, is 

adopted as the opinion of the court. 

'Vt(~1. C!.~.\V. MAURICE B. COHILL, JR. 

United States District Judge 

cc: Susan Paradise Baxter 

U.S. Magistrate Judge 

all parties of record __ 

Case 1:06-cv-00178-MBC-SPB Document 138 Filed 01/04/10 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 21

                             Matrix Bancorp, Inc.

                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant


1.    Matrix Financial Services Corporation - Incorporated in Arizona

2.    United Financial, Inc. - Incorporated in Colorado

3.    Matrix Capital Bank - Organized pursuant to a Federal savings and loan
      charter

4.    Matrix Asset Management Corporation - Incorporated in Colorado and
      formerly known as
      United Special Services, Inc.

5.    The Vintage Group, Inc. - Incorporated in Texas

6.    Vintage Delaware Holdings, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware

7.    Sterling Trust Company - Incorporated in Texas

8.    First Matrix Investment Services Corp. - Incorporated in Texas

9.    Matrix Funding Corp. - Incorporated in Colorado

10.   MSCS Ventures, Inc. - Incorporated in Colorado and formerly known as
      Matrix Advisory Services Corporation

11.   Matrix Settlement & Clearance Services, L.L.C. (45%) - Organized in New
      York

12.   Equi-Mor Holdings, Inc. - Incorporated in Nevada

13.   ABS School Services, L.L.C. - Organized in Arizona

14.   Matrix Aviation Corporation - Incorporated in Colorado

15.   MCNP-1 Corp. - Incorporated in New Mexico

16.   Dasalco Corporation - Incorporated in New Mexico

17.   Matrix Advisory Services, Inc. - Incorporated in Delaware and formerly
      known as Leader Acquisition Corp.

18.   Matrix Insurance Service Corporation - Incorporated in Arizona

19.   Matrix Bancorp Capital Trust I - Organized under Delaware law
#### FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1763.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 13, 1978.

Jack L. McRay, Tallahassee, for appellant.

William W. Carpenter, Asst. Public Defender, Sanford, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has filed a notice of appeal directed to an order rendered in a criminal case. Since appellant had no standing in the court below it has no standing here and this matter is dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

DOWNEY, C. J., and DAUKSCH and MOORE, JJ., concur.
PUBLIC LAW 113–36—SEPT. 18, 2013 127 STAT. 521 

Public Law 113–36 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To modify the boundary of the Minuteman Missile National Historic Site in the 

State of South Dakota, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Minuteman Missile National 

Historic Site Boundary Modification Act’’. 

SEC. 2. BOUNDARY MODIFICATION. 

Section 3(a) of the Minuteman Missile National Historic Site 

Establishment Act of 1999 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 106– 

115) is amended— 

(1) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs 

(4) and (5), respectively; and 

(2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following: 

‘‘(3) VISITOR FACILITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.— 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the components 

described in paragraph (2), the historic site shall include 

a visitor facility and administrative site located on the 

parcel of land described in subparagraph (B). 

‘‘(B) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in 

subparagraph (A) consists of— 

‘‘(i) approximately 25 acres of land within the Buffalo Gap National Grassland, located north of exit 131 

on Interstate 90 in Jackson County, South Dakota, 

as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Minuteman 

Missile National Historic Site Boundary Modification’, 

numbered 406/80,011A, and dated January 14, 2011; 

and 

‘‘(ii) approximately 3.65 acres of land located at 

the Delta 1 Launch Control Facility for the construction 

and use of a parking lot and for other administrative 

uses. 

‘‘(C) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map described in 

subparagraph (B) shall be kept on file and available for 

public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National 

Park Service. 

‘‘(D) TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION.— 

Administrative jurisdiction over the land described in 

subparagraph (B) is transferred from the Secretary of Agriculture to the Secretary, to be administered as part of 

the historic site. 

Minuteman 

Missile National 

Historic Site 

Boundary 

Modification Act. 

16 USC 461 note. 

Sept. 18, 2013 

[S. 459] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
127 STAT. 522 PUBLIC LAW 113–36—SEPT. 18, 2013 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 459: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113–193 (Comm. on Natural Resources). 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 113–32 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013): 

June 19, considered and passed Senate. 

Sept. 10, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

‘‘(E) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—The boundaries of the 

Buffalo Gap National Grassland are modified to exclude 

the land transferred under subparagraph (D).’’. 

Approved September 18, 2013. 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
Exhibit 23.1



| |  |                                                                                                   
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | LOGO                                                                                              
| |  | Gaffney, Cline & Associates, Inc.                                                                 
| | 
| |  | 1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 1000
Houston, TX 77056 Telephone: +1 713 850
9955 www.gaffney-cline.com



|                 |  |               
|---------------- |  | --------------
|DKM/gjh/C1900.02 |  | April 18, 2012

YPF S.A.

Macacha Guemes 515

C1106BKK Buenos Aires

Argentina

Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers

Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to the references to Gaffney, Cline &
Associates Inc. and the inclusion of our third party reports dated March 26 and March 27, 2013 and the information included therein in sections Information on the Company-Exploration and Production and Exhibits in
YPF S.A.s report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 to be filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Gaffney, Cline & Associates Inc. audited certain areas in Argentina in which YPF has interests. These external audits were performed with an as of date of September 30, 2012 and
December 31, 2012, as per corresponds.



| |  |                                   |  | 
| |  | --------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | Yours sincerely,                  |  | 
| |  |                                  
| |  | GAFFNEY, CLINE & ASSOCIATES, INC. |  | 
| |  |                                  
| |  | LOGO                              |  | 
| |  |                                  
| |  | David K. Morgan                   |  | 
| |  | Technical Director                |  |
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Merge Healthcare Incorporated; |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Justin C. Dearborn        |   |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Justin C. Dearborn            |
| Chief Executive Officer       |
| (principal executive officer) |

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.12


                Form of Certificate for Series C Preferred Stock

                         INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF

          No.                                                      Shares

                                 STATE OF HAWAII



                              ALOHA AIRGROUP, INC.



This certifies that __________________________________________ is the owner of

_____________________________________ Shares of each of the the Capital Stock of


                              ALOHA AIRGROUP, INC.


Transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

In Witness Whereof THE SAID CORPORATION HAS CAUSED THIS CERTIFICATE TO BE SIGNED
BY ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS TO BE SEALED WITH THE SEAL OF THE CORPORATION
THIS _______ DAY OF _________________ A.D. 20__________

______________________________                    ______________________________
President                                         Secretary

                                Shares $1.00 Each



<PAGE>




                                   CERTIFICATE

                                       FOR



                                     SHARES

                                     OF THE

                                  Capital Stock



                                    ISSUED TO



                                      DATED



----------------------------------------------------------------------
For Value Received _____ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
Shares of the Capital Stock represented by the within Certificates and
do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
______________________________________ to transfer the said
Stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power
of substitution in the premises.
Date ____________ 20___.
In the presence of
______________________________________________________________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DONALD BARTO, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-294 Erie

v. )

)

MARILYN BROOKS, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on

October 7, 2005 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise

Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on November 30,

2006, recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed and that a

certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the

date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail at

the SCI Albion, where he is incarcerated, and on Respondent. Petitioner has filed no

objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter’s Report and Recommendation. After de novo

review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and

Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is 

DISMISSED and that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on

November 30, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00294-SJM-SPB Document 12 Filed 12/20/06 Page 1 of 1
#### John MILITANA, Appellant, v. Fern KALB, Appellee.

No. 78-16.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 26, 1978.

John Militana of Militana, Militana & Mi-litana, Miami, for appellant.

David B. Kesler of Law Offices of W. A. Heth, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

*466PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Militana seeks to appeal an order granting defendant Kalb’s motion for summary judgment. The order concludes by saying, “Defendant’s Motion for Summary Motion [sic] be and the same is hereby granted.” This is not a final decision, order judgment, or decree within the contemplation of Fla.R.App.P. 3.2(b). Nor is this case properly subject to interlocutory appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 4.2(a). Since we have no jurisdiction, this appeal is dismissed *sua sponte. Rizzuto v. DiPaolo,*357 So.2d 490, Case No. 77-1499 (Fla. 2d DCA opinion filed April 19, 1978); *Arnold v. Brady,*178 So.2d 732 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965).

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and RYDER, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices 

# Order

June 1, 2018

157097

FAYTREON ONEE WEST,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 157097

COA: 335190

Wayne CC: 15

- 005357

- NO

CITY OF DETROIT,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 12, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this

order addressing: (1) whether strict or substantial compliance is required with the notice

provision contained within MCL 691.140 4(2), compare Rowland v Washtenaw County

Road Commission , 477 Mich 197 (2007), with Plunkett v Dep’t of Transportation , 286

Mich App 168 (2009); (2) whether the plaintiff’s notice failed to comply with MCL

691.1404(2) under either a strict or substantial c ompliance standard; (3) whether the

Legislature’s use of the word “shall” in MCL 691.1404(1) and the word “may” in MCL

691.1404(2) indicates that service on an individual is not the only method of serving

proper notice ; and (4) whether an individual descri bed in MCR 2.105(G)(2) can delegate

the legal authority to accept lawful process under MCL 691.1404(2), see 1 Mich Civ Jur

Agency § 1 (2018). In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electronically file an

appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must

provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall

file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The

appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use

of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant

within 14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The parties should not submit

mere restatements of their application papers.I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 1, 2018

d0529 2

Clerk Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this

case may move the Court for permission to file bri efs amicus curiae.

We further direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same

future session of the Court when it will hear oral argument in Wigfall v City of Detroit

(Docket No. 156793).
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark Scott, Chief Operating and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive and Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company with
the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not
be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as
specifically required by law.

                                        /s/ Mark Scott
                                        Mark Scott
                                        Chief Operating and Financial Officer
                                        November 19, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DEMETRIUS BROWN, )

Petitioner, )

)

Vs. ) Civil Action No. 04-379 Erie

)

U.S. JUSTICE DEPT., et. al., )

Respondent. )

)

O R D E R

AND NOW, to wit, this 15th day of March, 2006, the Court having reviewed 

the Petitioner’s Appeal filed March 14, 2006 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Order dated March 2, 2006 

is hereby AFFIRMED. 

 S/Sean J. McLaughlin 

Sean J. McLaughlin,

United States District Judge

cc: parties of record. nmk

 Magistrate Judge Baxter

Case 1:04-cv-00379-SJM-SPB Document 69 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IA Global, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan
Margerison, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report.

         This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance
by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company (or equivalent) with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be
used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.

                                        /s/ Alan Margerison
                                        Alan Margerison
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        May 13, 2005