USA Banner
  U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Here's how you knowOfficial US Government Icon
              **Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
            Secure Site Icon
              **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
 U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation
 Search DOT
            Search
                    About FHWAFHWA Organization
                Headquarters Offices
                Field Offices
                Strategic Plan
                Business Opportunities
                Staff Directories
                Careers
                Highway History
                Contact UsProgramsAcquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                Safety
                Browse by TopicsResourcesCore Highway Topics
                Federal Aid Essentials
                Automation
                Complete Streets
                Laws and Regulations
                Policy & Guidance Center
                Section 508
                Publications and Statistics
                Professional Development
                National Highway Institute
                Resource Center
                Accessibility Resource Library
                FHWA Research LibraryNewsroomPress Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Photos
                Videos
                Media ContactsMenu FHWA Highway Safety Programs Home
                        Roadside Safety Hardware Identification Methods


            
            In This Section
        Roadway Departure Safety
                Strategic Approach
                                Strategic Plan
                Crash Emphasis Brochures
                Focused Approach
                Noteworthy Practices
                Partner Resources
                Keep Vehicles on the Road
                                Pavement Friction
                Horizontal Curve Safety
                Rumble Strips and Rumble Stripes
                Nighttime Visibility
                Provide for a Safe Recovery
                                SafetyEdge
                Clear Zones
                Reduce Crash Severity
                                Overview
                Hardware Eligibility Letters
                Focus on Reducing Rural Roadway Departures (FoRRRwD)
                                Overview
                All Public Roads
                Proven Countermeasures
                Systemic Approach
                Safety Action Plans
                FoRRRwD Resources
                
                Chapter 5. Evaluation of ID Methods
Chapter 5. Evaluation of ID Methods

Based on the identified ID methods discussed, an evaluation matrix was created to compare the performance of each in various areas. A grading system was used to create the evaluation matrix. Grades were based primarily on a review of literature, and a review of manufacturer specifications. Participation in various demonstrations, and input from the expert panel through consensus also informed the grading.

The performance areas are listed in this chapter and describe the background and reasoning behind the grading provided for each ID method. An evaluation matrix summarizes the grading to facilitate the selection of an ID method based on each performance area.

Transportation agencies can use the evaluation matrix in this chapter to select their preferred ID method. Each method has strengths and weaknesses. Selecting a preferred ID method is greatly dependent on the agency’s needs. Beyond the evaluation matrix, it is important to quantify the cost and scale of implementation of the ID method to determine feasibility.

EVALUATION APPROACH

As previously discussed, the three primary ID methods are:

1D or 2D barcodes (printed on the hardware and as tag identifiers).
	Passive or active RFID (as tag identifiers).
	Serial numbers (printed, stamped, and in combination with barcode tag identifiers).These primary methods all have various attributes that may or may not impact an overall rating. Methods were graded based on their best commercially available option for that attribute.

Performance Areas Evaluated

This chapter summarizes information about how the ID methods were evaluated, along with the results of the evaluation. The ID methods are evaluated for their ability to:

Convey data.
	Withstand roadside conditions.
	Connect to existing systems.The issues for method selection, discussed in the previous chapter, informed the evaluation of the ID methods for each of these three aspects. Cost is also a factor for agencies to consider alongside performance. It was not evaluated separately because the cost varies significantly based on the desired performance and quantity. The following performance areas address these three aspects:

Convey data:
	Information storage capacity.
		Read distance.
		Read rate.
		Line of sight and angled reading.
		Automation and mobile reading.
		Read/write options.
		Event trigger options.
	Ability to withstand roadway conditions:
	General roadside durability.
		Vandalism-related durability.
		Maintenance activities.
		Crash event durability.
	Ability to connect to existing systems:
	Connectivity.
		Equipment needs.
		Software needs.
		Information security.Grading

A five-level grading system was used:

Poor–the method provides minimal or no performance.
	Fair–the method provides low performance.
	Good–the method provides acceptable performance.
	Very good–the method provides above-acceptable performance but has some disadvantages.
	Excellent–the method provides above-acceptable performance and has only minimal disadvantages.An *excellent* grade suggests the highest capability, while a *poor* grade suggests minimal capability in the corresponding performance area.

EVALUATION RESULTS

Each of the performance areas are discussed in the following sections with some detail regarding how the various ID methods performed. The evaluation results for all methods by performance area are presented in the evaluation matrix (table 2). The table is useful to easily compare the capabilities of each ID method.

Table 2. Evaluation of ID methods for all performance areas.
	Performance Area
			Barcodes
			RFID
			Serial Number1D
			2D
			Passive
			ActiveInformation storage capacity
			Fair
			Good
			Very good
			Excellent
			PoorRead distance
			Good
			Fair
			Very good
			Excellent
			PoorRead rate
			Good
			Good
			Excellent
			Excellent
			PoorLine of sight and angled reading
			Fair
			Good
			Excellent
			Excellent
			PoorAutomation and mobile reading
			Good
			Good
			Very good
			Excellent
			PoorRead/write options
			Good
			Good
			Excellent
			Excellent
			FairEvent trigger options
			Poor
			Poor
			Very good
			Very good
			PoorGeneral roadside durability
			Excellent
			Excellent
			Excellent
			Excellent
			ExcellentVandalism-related durability
			Good
			Good
			Excellent
			Very good
			FairMaintenance activities
			Very good
			Very good
			Excellent
			Fair
			Very goodCrash event durability
			Very good
			Very good
			Excellent
			Excellent
			PoorConnectivity
			Very good
			Excellent
			Excellent
			Excellent
			GoodEquipment needs
			Very good
			Good
			Fair
			Fair
			ExcellentSoftware needs
			Very good
			Very good
			Very good
			Very good
			ExcellentInformation security
			Excellent
			Excellent
			Excellent
			Very good
			ExcellentInformation Storage Capacity

The information storage capacity performance area primarily considers the number of printed characters or matrices and electronic data. Typically, one character is 8 bits.

The 1D barcodes allow up to 48 characters or approximately 384 bits, and 2D bar codes allow up to 4,296 characters or approximately 34 KB. Passive RFID allows up to 64 KB, and active RFID allows up to 128 KB. Serial numbers have no electronic data storage on the tag, and the tag size determines the available area for printed information.

Read Distance

The read distance performance area considers the maximum distance a user can read information from a selected ID method without considering line-of-sight requirements.

The 1D barcode tag identifiers generally have reading distances of less than 15 ft. (5 m), and the reading distance depends on tag size and scanner settings. The 2D barcode tag identifiers have maximum scanning distances that are approximately half the distance of 1D barcode tag identifiers. Passive RFID tag identifiers have reading distances that approach 100 ft. (33 m). Active RFID tag identifiers have reading distances that approach 300 ft. (100 m) due to beacon-like signals from internal power sources. Serial number identifiers have reading distances limited to the human eye or photo magnification, and the reading distance depends on the size of the tag.

Read Rate

The read rate performance area evaluates the number of tags that users can read over a given period of time, excluding distance but including line-of-sight considerations.

The 1D barcode scanners can read one tag per scan and are limited by line of sight and a successful scan. The 2D barcode scanners can read one tag per scan and are limited by line of sight and a successful scan; 2D barcodes generally take a longer time to scan. Both passive and active RFID tags can be read in many multiples per scan, up to 100 tags at once, with appropriate middleware. Serial number identifiers are limited to a single manual read and limited by line of sight.

Line of Sight and Angled Reading

The line-of-sight and angled reading performance area evaluates the method’s line-of-sight requirements for scanning and reading tags without consideration for reading distance.

The 1D barcode tag identifiers require direct line of sight and proper alignment of tag and scanner lasers. The 2D barcode tag identifiers can be read at an angle but still require partial line of sight. Passive and active RFID tag identifiers can be read within the reader’s generated magnetic field and do not require direct line of sight. Serial number identifiers must be read manually, and line of sight is required.

Automation and Mobile Reading

The automation and mobile reading performance area evaluates the ability of users to read ID tags automatically with consideration for mobile tags or readers and reading distance.

The 1D barcode tag identifiers require the barcode and scanner to be aligned. The 2D barcode tag identifiers offer some allowance for misalignment with angled scanning, but the tag has to be fairly close to the scanner. Passive RFID tag identifiers can be read automatically and while the reader or tag is moving. Active RFID tag identifiers can be read automatically while the reader or tag is moving; with the beacon function, they can be used to capture all tags within a radius of the reader. Serial number identifiers are limited to human interaction.

Read/Write Options

The read/write options performance area evaluates the available choices for reading and placing information on the selected ID method and does not include consideration for use with a connected database, only what information users can read from or add to the physical tag.

The 1D barcode tag identifiers are print (write) once, read only; some basic barcode types have character limitations. The 2D barcode tag identifiers are print (write) once, read only. Passive and active RFID tag identifiers are available in read-only; write-once, read-only; read/write; read/write with locking; and kill options. Serial number identifiers are write once, read only (non-electronic).

Event Trigger Options

The event trigger options performance area evaluates the ability of users to associate tags with additional electronic sensors, such as an accelerometer, without consideration for reading distance.

The 1D and 2D barcode tag identifiers have no event trigger options. Passive and active RFID tag identifiers have event trigger options but require reading of the tag. Serial number identifiers have no event trigger options outside physical damage.

General Roadside Durability

The general roadside durability performance area evaluates the ability of commercially available ID methods to withstand roadside conditions, such as temperature; exposure to moisture, wind, and abrasion; ultraviolet degradation; and roadside chemicals as described in a review of roadside conditions and manufacturer specifications. This evaluation does not include the need for maintenance or vandalism/crash event durability.

All ID methods and tag identifiers have options available to withstand all common roadside conditions.

Vandalism-Related Durability

The vandalism-related durability performance area evaluates the potential threat of vandalism including removing a tag, defacing a tag, or attempting to destroy an installed tag.

The 1D and 2D barcode tag identifiers can be found with stain-resistant properties, but barcodes could be obstructed or physically damaged. Passive RFID tag identifiers have impact-resistant properties (encasements) available and can be disguised as a hardware component or obstructed by reflective tape. Active RFID tag identifiers are not permanent since batteries need to be replaced periodically; the tag identifiers are also bulky, potentially limiting concealment options. Stain-resistant serial number identifiers are available, but tags could be obstructed or physically damaged; for example, stamped serial numbers could be filed off.

Maintenance Activities

The maintenance activities performance area evaluates the need for maintenance after installation and considers the best available attachment methods, plus resistance to staining and smearing.

The 1D and 2D barcode tag identifiers are stain resistant but may need cleaning before scanning. Passive RFID tag identifiers have no maintenance requirements if operating within specifications. Active RFID tags need to be replaced every 3 to 5 years due to battery life. There have been some advancements in battery life, with some manufacturers claiming a 10-year battery life. There is no easy way for a transportation agency to determine when battery life has ended. Like barcodes, serial number identifiers are stain resistant but may need cleaning before reading.

Crash Event Durability

The crash event durability performance area evaluates performance during and after a crash event, including forced dislodging of tags from roadside safety hardware.

The 1D and 2D barcode tag identifiers are available with resistance to abrasion, but crash events could damage the surface, rendering it unreadable, and there is no recovery option outside manually locating dislodged tags. Passive RFID tag identifiers are available with impact resistance, and dislodged tags can be found with readers and a proximity scan. Active RFID tag identifiers are available with rugged encasement; dislodged tags can be found with a proximity reader, and beacon tags can send out an active signal to help locate them. Serial number tag identifiers are available with resistance to abrasion, but crash events could damage the surface, rendering it unreadable; there are no recovery options outside manually locating dislodged tags.

Connectivity

The connectivity performance area evaluates the ability to connect with existing systems.

The 1D barcode tag identifiers have maximum character limitations that could prevent the use of existing asset identifiers; however, 1D barcodes can be read electronically, and users can connect scanners to the server database. Similarly, 2D barcode tag identifiers and both passive and active RFID tag identifiers can be read electronically, and users can connect scanners/readers to the server database. Serial number tag identifiers require manual input into a connected server database interface.

Equipment Needs

The equipment needs performance area evaluates the need for equipment to access the information on a tag. The evaluation method does not consider tools required to install tags.

The 1D and 2D barcode tag identifiers require a separate scanner although many available cell phone applications can read barcodes. The 1D barcodes also allow for the ID number to be printed (on a combined tag) under the barcode. Barcodes in general also require an interface for database connectivity. Passive and active RFID tag identifiers require a separate reader and an interface for database connectivity. Serial number tag identifiers have no immediate equipment requirement but require an interface (laptop) for database connectivity.

Software Needs

The software needs performance area evaluates the need for software for users to operate the ID method beyond onboard reader software and existing asset management software.

The 1D and 2D barcode tag identifiers require a server connection. Passive and active RFID tag identifiers require middleware for a server connection. Serial number identifiers require no software, but software may be needed to input and/or access data.

Information Security

The information security performance area evaluates how secure safety hardware information is once placed on the tag or when transportation agencies use a tag to connect to a back-end server database. This performance area does not evaluate physical tag security (discussed separately as vandalism).

The 1D and 2D barcode tag identifiers can be read by any scanner set to a specific barcode type, but users can encrypt identifiers, and back-end security may be necessary to prevent unauthorized access. Passive and active RFID tag identifiers can be read by any RFID reader (at greater distances for active RFID tags), but users can encrypt identifiers in the back end and/or lock writable memory blocks. If active RFID tags are used for greater storage, information exposure is a concern because tags can be geo-located using GPS. Serial number identifiers can be read by anyone, but without connectivity, security threats are isolated to the back-end interface where back-end security may be necessary to prevent unauthorized access.

CHAPTER SUMMARY

The ID methods were evaluated and graded for their ability to convey data, withstand roadside conditions, and connect to existing systems. The results of the evaluation allow transportation agencies to determine which ID method is best suited to their purpose. The evaluation showed the investigated ID methods to be adaptable to a transportation agency’s needs, once these needs are identified. The next chapter summarizes the findings included in this report.
      
  Book traversal links for Chapter 5. Evaluation of ID Methods
      ‹ Chapter 4. Selection of ID Methods
                    Up
                    Chapter 6. Summary and Conclusions ›
                
                Book:Roadside Safety Hardware Identification Methods
              List of Abbreviations
                Executive Summary
                Chapter 1. Background
                Chapter 2. Safety Hardware ID Practices
                Chapter 3. ID Methods Using Tag Identifiers
                Chapter 4. Selection of ID Methods
                Chapter 5. Evaluation of ID Methods
                Chapter 6. Summary and Conclusions
                References
                Appendix A. Standards for RFID Tags
                Appendix B. Cost Matrix of RFID Tags U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Highway Administration**

1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE

WASHINGTON, DC 20590

202-366-4000Subscribe to email updates
                    About
  

        
              About FHWA
                Careers
                Org Chart
                Staff Directories
                Work with UsPrograms
  

        
              Acquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                SafetyPolicies, Rights, Legal
  

        
              About DOT
                Accessibility
                Budget and Performance
                Civil Rights
                FOIA
                Information Quality
                No FEAR Act
                Office of Inspector General
                Privacy Policy
                USA.gov
                Web Policies and Notices
                Web StandardsNews & Events
  

        
              Newsroom
                Press Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Media Contacts
                Connect with Us