1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

REGINALD REAVES )

Petitioner, )

) C.A. No. 05-347Erie

vs. ) District Judge McLaughlin 

) Magistrate Judge Baxter 

PA BD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, et al )

Respondents. )

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I. RECOMMENDATION

It is respectfully recommended that the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus be

transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 

II. REPORT

This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, filed by a state

prisoner presently incarcerated in the Western District of Pennsylvania. 

In his petition for writ of habeas corpus, Petitioner attacks the denial of his parole by the

Parole Board, as well as his underlying conviction. Document # 7, Petition, page 6. Both the

Delaware County District Attorney’s office and the Board of Probation and Parole have filed

Responses to the petition. Documents # 11 and 12.

Title 28 U.S.C. §2241(d) provides that where an application for a writ of habeas corpus is

made by a person in custody under the judgment and sentence of a state court of a state which

contains two or more federal judicial districts,

the application may be filed in the district court for the district

wherein such person is in custody or in the district court for the

district within which the state court was held which convicted and

sentenced him and each of such district courts shall have

concurrent jurisdiction to entertain the application. The district

court for the district wherein such an application is filed in the

exercise of its discretion and in furtherance of justice may transfer

the application to the other district court for hearing and

determination.

Case 1:05-cv-00347-SJM-SPB Document 13 Filed 01/25/06 Page 1 of 2
2

28 U.S.C. §2241(d). See also, Bell v. Watkins, 692 F.2d 999 (5th Cir. 1982) (the district court

transferred the action on the basis of the magistrate's recommendation which indicated that the

district where the defendant was convicted was the more convenient forum because of the

accessibility of evidence). 

In the case at bar, Petitioner was tried and convicted in Delaware County, Pennsylvania. 

Petitioner’s records are located there. See Document # 12, page 11. Petitioner is presently

incarcerated at the State Correctional Institution at Marienville within the Western District of

Pennsylvania. Delaware County, the county of the conviction, is located in the Eastern District

of Pennsylvania. This Court finds that the interests of justice would be better served by

transferring this petition to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania wherein the underlying

conviction in this case occurred. 

III. CONCLUSION

It is respectfully recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be transferred to

the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§2241(d).

In accordance with the Magistrate Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1) (B) and (C), and Rule

72.1.4(B) of the Local Rules for Magistrates, the parties are allowed ten days from the date of

service to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation. Any party opposing the

objections shall have seven days from the date of service of objections to respond thereto. 

Failure to file timely objections may constitute a waiver of any appellate rights.

S/ Susan Paradise Baxter

SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dated: January 25, 2006

Case 1:05-cv-00347-SJM-SPB Document 13 Filed 01/25/06 Page 2 of 2