alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed July 27, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-810

Lower Tribunal No. 16-27442

________________

New Horizons Condominium Master Association, Inc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Robert Harding and Fifth Horizons Condominium, Inc.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles K. 

Johnson, Judge.

Scott J. Edwards, P.A., and Scott J. Edwards (Boca Raton), for 

appellant.

Mark Perlman, P.A., and Mark Perlman (Hollywood), for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON and LOBREE, JJ. 

FERNANDEZ, C.J.
2

New Horizons Condominium Master Association, Inc. appeals the trial 

court order awarding Robert Harding and Fifth Horizons Condominium, Inc. 

attorney’s fees and costs and attorney’s fees for fees incurred in litigating the 

amount of fees. Because this Court partially reversed the final judgment on 

the merits in a separate appeal brought by New Horizons, we reverse without 

prejudice the final judgment on all attorney’s fees. 

At the time this attorney’s fees appeal was filed, New Horizon’s merits 

appeal was pending before this Court. On February 23, 2022, we entered an 

opinion on the merits affirming in part and reversing in part and remanding 

with instructions, resulting in the reversal of the substantive portion of the 

trial court’s summary judgment order in favor of appellees.

1 See New 

Horizons Condo. Master Ass'n, Inc. v. Harding, 336 So. 3d 796, 801 (Fla. 3d 

DCA 2022). 

Because this case has been remanded to reconsider the substantive 

issues of breach, an award for attorney’s fees and attorney’s fees for fees is 

dependent on the trial court’s determination of the prevailing party below.

Additionally, piecemeal appeals are not appropriate “where claims are 

interrelated and involve the same transaction and the same parties remain 

1 This Court affirmed the trial court’s ruling requiring New Horizons to 

disclose past audits. New Horizons Cond., 336 So. 3d at 798.
3

in the suit.” Cicco v. Luckett Tobaccos, Inc., 934 So. 2d 560, 561 (Fla. 3d 

DCA 2006). 

Accordingly, we reverse without prejudice to filing an appeal on a new 

final judgment on attorney’s fees after the trial court has concluded its labor.

Reversed without prejudice and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,076
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,523
<INVENTORY>                                     65,783
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               161,382
<PP&E>                                          18,659
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,766
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,703
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,464
<SALES>                                        411,236
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               411,236
<CGS>                                          344,834
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  344,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,190
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,444
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,713
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,816
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,897
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,897
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60



</TABLE>
Case 1:04-cv-00128-MBC   Document 11   Filed 08/30/05   Page 1 of 8

Case 1:04-cv-00128-MBC   Document 11   Filed 08/30/05   Page 2 of 8

Case 1:04-cv-00128-MBC   Document 11   Filed 08/30/05   Page 3 of 8

Case 1:04-cv-00128-MBC   Document 11   Filed 08/30/05   Page 4 of 8

Case 1:04-cv-00128-MBC   Document 11   Filed 08/30/05   Page 5 of 8

Case 1:04-cv-00128-MBC   Document 11   Filed 08/30/05   Page 6 of 8

Case 1:04-cv-00128-MBC   Document 11   Filed 08/30/05   Page 7 of 8

Case 1:04-cv-00128-MBC   Document 11   Filed 08/30/05   Page 8 of 8

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2014-03-10T20:30:02-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0055 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-NM-167-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 2013-0188

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes,

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of RPM Advantage, Inc.
(the "Registrant") for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David R. Pressler, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


Date:   July 15, 2011

By:

/s/ David R. Pressler


David R. Pressler
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
EXHIBIT 23.2


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-49810, No. 333-106151,  No. 333-106152, No. 333-106153 and No.
333-114377 and Form S-3 No. 333-110090, 333-111092 and 333-122043) of our report
dated March 14, 2003 with respect to the consolidated  financial  statements and
schedule of Tarrant Apparel Group and  subsidiaries  for the year ended December
31, 2002 included in the Annual  Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended  December
31, 2004.


                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                ------------------------


Los Angeles, California
April 14, 2005
#### WALKER MEMORIAL SANITARIUM AND BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION v. HIGHLAND INSURANCE CO.

No. 39018.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 225 So.2d 572.
# ? i Cessn a Altetio n Compan y Ma y11 , 201 0

Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o fRulemalcin g 80 0 Independec e Ave. , S,W
. Washington , D.C
. 2059 1 T o Who m I tMa yConcern ; Thi s lette ri s a reques tt o petitio n th e FAAt o exten d th e duratio n o fExennptio n No
. 690 1 > a s amended , fro m CF R (FAR Section ) 91.40 9 (b ) vi/hic h currentl yexpire s o n Jun e 30 , 2010
. Thi s exemptio n i s reference d i n Docke t Numbe rFAA-2001-8741
. I ti s th e positio n o fCessn a Aircraf tCompan ythat : Th e condition s an d circumstance s regardin g publi cinteres tan d equivalen tlevel s o f safety , whic h warrante d th e origina l gran to fexemption , continu e t o exist , an d Goo d caus e exist s fo rwaivin g th e Federa l Registe rpublicatio n an d commen t procedure s sinc e thi s extensio n doe s no tse ta precedent
. I fyo u hav e an yquestion s o rcomment s regardin g thi s extension , I woul d b e happ yt o discus s the m a tyou rconvenience
. Than k you . Sincerely , Curti s Potuce k Custome rServic e Enginee r Cessn a Aircraf tCompan y 316.517.757 9 cpotucek@cessna.textron.co m

Cessna Aircraf

tCompan yP.O
. 6o x7708 , Wichita , Kansa

s 67277-7706 , 316.5TC.iili00 , Fa x315,942.91X1 6
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26591]



[[Page 52534]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-4-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Request for 
Extension of Waiver

Ocotber 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 15, 1997, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company, (Panhandle) in compliance with the March 13, 1997 \1\ and May 
21, 1997 \2\ orders of the Commission in the captioned docket tendered 
for filing a request for an extension of the six month waiver 
previously granted by the Commission with respect to compliance with 
the data elements and formatting as adopted by the Commission in Order 
No. 587.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, 78 FERC para. 61,283 
(1997).
    \2\ Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, 79 FERC para. 61,223 
(1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Panhandle states that under the waiver, it was required to submit 
its requests for changes to the data elements to the Gas Industry 
Standards Board (GISB). Panhandle states that it has implemented the 
changes already approved by GISB, but requests an extension of the 
waiver until the Commission adopts the next version of the GISB 
standards. With respect to those requests still pending at GISB, 
Panhandle requests an additional six months extension of time.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests should comply with 
principles set forth in the Commission's May 21, 1997 order and must be 
filed by October 14, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining appropriate action to be taken, but will not 
serve to make protestants parties to this proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary
[FR Doc. 97-26591 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 United States Code Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of 
the following National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Perinatal Studies of Disorders of Fetal Metabolism.
    Date: October 6-7, 1997.
    Time: October 6-7:30 p.m.-10:00 p.m.; October 7--8:30 a.m.-
adjournment.
    Place: The Glidden House Inn, 1901 Ford Drive, Cleveland, Ohio 
44106.
    Contact Person: Gopal Bhatnagar, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, NICHD, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 6100 Building-Room 
5E01, Rockville, Maryland 20852; Telephone: 301-496-1485.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review a grant application.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. the 
discussions of this application could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
application, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is published less than 15 days prior to the meeting 
due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by the 
review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. [93.864, 
Population Research and No. 93.865, Research Mothers and Children], 
National Institutes of Health.)
    Dated: October 1, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-26503 Filed 10-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of the APO Health,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period  ended March 31,  2006 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Dr. Jan Stahl,
Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated: May 10, 2006                  /s/ Jan Stahl
                                     ---------------------------------------
                                     Dr. Jan Stahl
                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                     and Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Hooker Furniture Corporation (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, E. Larry Ryder, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                        
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: July 6, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ E. Larry Ryder     
|                   |  |     |  | E. Larry Ryder         
|                   |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE)

 

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of Sunland Entertainment Co., Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of theCompany on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “10-KSB Report”) that:

 

(1)                                  the 10-KSB Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the 10-KSB Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  April 14, 2003 | /s/ Roger Burlage           |   |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                       | Roger Burlage               |
|                       | Co-President  and           |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer     |
|                       |                        |
|                       |                        |
| Date:  April 14, 2003 | /s/ Gary  Freeman           |   |
|                       | Gary Freeman                |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer and |
|                       | Corporate Secretary         |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology


Judges Panel of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pusurant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 
2, notice is hereby given that the Judges Panel of the Malcolm 
Baldridge National Quality Award will meet on: Monday, October 6, 1997, 
from 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.; Tuesday, October 7, 1997, from 8:00 a.m. 
to 5:30 p.m.; Wednesday, October 8, 1997, from 8:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.; 
and Thursday, October 9, 1997, from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. The Judges 
Panel is composed of nine members prominent in the field of quality 
management and appointed by the Secretary of Commerce. The Panel's 
agenda includes reviewing the 1997 award process and final judging of 
1997 applicants, including a review of each of the 1997 site visits. 
The review process involves examination of records and discussions of 
applicant data, and will be closed to the public in accordance with 
Section 552b(c) (4) of Title 5, United States Code. .

DATES: The meeting will convene October 6, 1997, at 9:00 a.m. and 
adjourn at 3:00 p.m. on October 9, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology, Administration Building Conference Room, 
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Harry Hertz, Director, National Quality Program, National Institute 
of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, telephone 
number (301) 975-2361.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Assistant Secretary for Administration, 
with the concurrence of the General Counsel, formally determined on 
February 10, 1997, that the meeting of the Judges Panel will be closed 
pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. app. 2, section 10(d) for those portions of the meeting which 
involve examination of records and discussion with section 552b(c) (4) 
of Title 5, United States Code, since those portions of the meeting are 
likely to disclose trade secrets and commercial or financial 
information obtained from a person which is privileged or confidential.

    Dated: September 22, 1997.
Elaine Bunten-Mines,
Director, Program Office.
[FR Doc. 97-25496 Filed 9-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-M
#### James Elmore STAPLES and David Benjamin Jordan, Jr., Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-248.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 12, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.