alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Forrest Lake Townhouse Association, Inc. v. Billy B. Martin

Appellate case number: 01-14-00281-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-72008

Trial court: 157th District Court of Harris County

On September 15, 2014, appellee Billy Martin filed an unopposed Motion to Reconsider 

Denial of Oral Argument. The motion is granted. Oral argument will be held on Thursday, 

November 6, 2014, at 10:30 a.m. An amended submission notice will be sent to the parties.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/ Harvey Brown____________________________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 16, 2014
Reader’s Guide for Chlorfenapyr 

CRM: Susan Bartow 

EPA/OCSPP/OPP/PRD

Reader’s Guide to Chlorfenapyr Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0467 

Publication Date: June 23, 2010 

The Agency is providing the “Readers Guide” to allow the reader to more easily access and 

navigate the various entries contained in the chlorfenapyr docket. 

Federal Register and Docket Organizational Documents: 

Docket Item 1. Federal Register Notice: Registration Review; Pesticide Dockets Opened 

for Review and Comment. 

Docket Item 2. Reader’s Guide to the Chlorfenapyr Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0467. 

Docket Item 3. Chlorfenapyr Summary Document Registration Review: Initial Docket 

June 2010. 

Human Health Documents for Registration Review 

Docket Item 4. Chlorfenapyr. Human-Health Assessment Scoping Document in Support 

of Registration Review. May 26, 2010. 

This document evaluates the status of the human health assessments to determine the scope of 

work necessary to support the registration review of chlorfenapyr.

Docket Item 5. Chlorfenapyr: Review of Human Incidents. February 25, 2010.

This report represents human health incidents occurring in the United States from 2002 to the 

present for the single chemical, chlorfenapyr, only.

Environmental Fate and Effects Documents for Registration Review 

Docket Item 6. Registration Review - Preliminary Problem Formulation for the Ecological 

Risk, Environmental Fate, and Endangered Species Assessments for 

Chlorfenapyr. May 11, 2010.

This document defines the problem for the assessment, and develops a plan for analyzing and 

characterizing the ecological risks.
Use and Usage Information for Registration Review 

Docket Item 7. Appendix A: Food/Feed & Non-Food/Non-Feed Uses Considered in 

Registration Review Work Planning. Chlorfenapyr (129093). June 8, 

2009. 

This table lists the food/feed and non-food/non- feed uses for chlorfenapyr.

Docket Item 8. Chlorfenapyr (129093) California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) 

Usage Data. June 30, 2009. 

This table lists the pounds of chlorfenapyr used in California from 2005-2007.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00559-CR

Justin Deal Collingwood, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 62565, HONORABLE PHILLIP ZEIGLER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was due February 10, 2010. The brief has not been received and

appellant’s appointed attorney, Jeffrey D. Parker, did not respond to the Court’s notice that the brief

is overdue.

The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether the attorney it appointed to represent

appellant has abandoned the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make appropriate

findings and recommendations. If necessary, the court shall appoint substitute counsel who will

effectively represent appellant in this cause. A record from this hearing, including copies of all
findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, shall be forwarded to the Clerk

of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than May 14, 2010. Rule 38.8(b)(3).

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Abated

Filed: April 15, 2010

Do Not Publish

2
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Harold Lee JACKSON.

No. 60242.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

Jerry A. Kirby, Monroe, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Johnny C. Par-kerson, Dist. Atty., Stephanie W. Dawson, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6060

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HAISSAM NASHAR, a/k/a Sam,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, 

District Judge. (3:06-cr-00084-RLV-1; 3:10-cv-00092-RLV)

Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Haissam Nashar, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Michel Smith, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Haissam Nashar seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Nashar has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE>

       EXHIBIT 11.1

STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE INCOME
                                   (in thousands, except for earnings per share data)
                                                 1995                        1996                        1997
<CAPTION>
                                         Basic        Diluted        Basic        Diluted        Basic        Diluted
------------------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
<S>                                   <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Share calculation:
Average number of common shares
         outstanding                         8,342       8,342         8,481         8,481         7,824         7,824
Common stock equivalents due to
         assumed exercise of options             -         414             -           311             -           350
Common stock equivalents due to
         assumed conversion of                   -         546             -           128             -             -
         preferred stock
Common stock equivalents due to
         assumed conversion of                   -         568             -             -             -         1,582
         convertible debt
                                      ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Total common shares and common
         stock equivalents                   8,342       9,871         8,481         8,920         7,824         9,756
------------------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Adjustments to net income:
Net income                               $  12,902   $  12,902     $  19,158     $  19,158      $ 14,500      $ 14,500
Less:  Preferred dividend
requirements based on average                (335)           -          (64)             -             -             -
number of preferred shares
Less:  Interest expense net of tax               -         237             -             -             -         1,187
------------------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------

Net income available to common           $  12,567   $  13,139     $  19,094     $  19,158      $ 14,500      $ 15,686
shareholders

Income per share                       $      1.51  $             $             $             $     1.85    $     1.61
                                                          1.33          2.25          2.15
------------------------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

INSWEB CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of InsWeb Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark P. Guthrie, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Mark P. Guthrie                               |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Mark P.  Guthrie  President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 14,  2002                                        |

 

----
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Federal White-Collar Workers: Their Occupations and Salaries, June, 1951

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Federal White-Collar Workers: Their Occupations and Salaries, June, 1951 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1117*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1953,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4447,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Opinion issued September 18, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00380-CV

———————————

MABEL NEBO GIBSON, Appellant

V.

EKTO HOLDINGS TRUSTEE OF 17330 BARONSHIRE

TRUST UDT 6/25/13, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1045664

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Mabel Nebo Gibson, has neither established indigence nor paid, 

or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R.
2

APP. P. 20.1, 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, 

appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending 

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.
Data Fi l e C:\CHEM32\3\DATA\6850 01\6850 01-002263 . D Sample N ame : Acq . Operator Sample Operator Acq. Instrument In j ection Date Method Last changed SYSTEM SYSTEM 6850 01 9/4/2014 3:43 : 24 PM C : \CHEM32\3\METHODS\MHD6MH . M 8/2/2014 7 : 05 : 12 AM by SYSTEM F I D1 A , (68 5 0 _01\6 85 0

_ 0 1-0 0 226 3.0) p A -**~** Location Vial 1 Inj Volume Manually

9 00

### 111131515-Pentameth~ltrisiloxane 

### {M'D'M'} 

### lot 2688-81 99.3% M'D'M ' 800 R.I. 1.3747 MEW/CKB / AO 3 / 25 / 14 7 00 600 - 500 4 00 300 "<t 20 0-

# ~ 0

## ~ 100 0> co 

# 1 0 

# 2o 2 1 5 0 5 10 1 5



### =========================================== = === ====================== Area Percent Report**=============== ===** **===== ======** **===== ===========** **========= ==** **=========** Sorted By Multiplier Signal 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Use Multiplier & Dilution Factor with ISTDs Signal 1: FID 1 A , Peak RetTime Type Width Area H eig ht Area 

### # [min] [min] [pA*s] [pAl %**--- -l----** **--- l-** **--- --** **--- /-----** **----- /-** **------- --l** **--- ---** **-/** 

# 3o 

# 3s

l 2 . 890 BB 0 . 0215 44 . 48180 33.43836 0.08182 1 , 1, 2, 2-T e tr a m e thyldi s ilo xa n e (M'M ' ) 2 4.728 BV 0.1055 5.39936e4 6208 . 35498 99.31468 

### 1,1,3,5,5-Pentamethyltri s il ox ane(M ' D'M') 3 5 . 314 BV 0.0218 202 . 59 604 1 49. 75 630 0.37265 1,1,3, 3 , 5,5 -H exa m e thyltri s ilo x an e (M ' DM ' ) 4 5.355 VB 0 . 0196 125 . 50439 1 00 . 24983 0 . 23085 1 , 1,1, 3,5,5 -H exa m e thyltri s il oxa n e( MD ' M' ) Totals 5 . 43662e1 6491.79947

*** End of Report *** 68 5 0 01 9/4/ 2 014 4:43:28 PM SYSTEM P a g e l o f l mil
----

 

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Empyrean Holdings, Inc.., a Nevadacorporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, RobertL. Lee, President of the Company and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuantto Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect. 1350), that to myknowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Robert L. Lee                   ***

Robert L. Lee, President and

Chief Financial Officer

 

Dated: October 14, 2005

----
EXHIBIT 32.2



WRITTEN STATEMENT
 PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





The undersigned, Jennifer L. Botter, the Sr. Vice President and Corporate Controller (Principal Financial Officer), of Sun Healthcare Group, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, hereby certifies that:



(i)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 3, 2005 | /s/ Jennifer L. Botter
|------------------- | ----------------------
|                    | Jennifer L. Botter
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection  with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of China Elite Information Co., Ltd. (the Company) for the three month period ended August 31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the Report),  I, Li Kin Shing, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)
        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    Date:  October 12, 2007
        By
        /s/ Li Kin ShingLi Kin ShingPresident, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Duane L. DICKERSON.

No. 61641.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 3, 1978.

In re: Duane L. Dickerson applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, J.,

is of the opinion a hearing should be held by the District Court to determine whether applicant is being deprived of adequate medical treatment.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12

- 31240 Summary Calendar

MICHAEL COOPER , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v. TIM WILKINSON, individually and in his official capacity; NURSE ANGIE WOOD, individually and in her official capacity; SHERYL WILEY, individually and in her official capacity; PAT THOMAS , Defendant s
- Appellee s

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 1:09

- CV

- 1568

Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Michael Cooper appeals the dismissal of h is 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. His brief contains no citations to the record in support of either his statement of the facts or his legal argument. Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a)(7) and (9), the appellant’s brief must include “a statement o f facts relevant to the issues submitted for review with appropriate references to the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 19, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 12-31240 Document: 00512446883 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/19/2013No. 12

- 31240

record” and an argument section that contains the “appellant’s contentions and the reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record
on which t he appellant relies.” Because Cooper has not provided any record support for his appellate arguments, he has abandoned them by failing to adequately brief them

. See United States v. Cothran , 302 F.3d 279, 286 n.7 (5th Cir. 2002); Yohey v. Collins , 985 F. 2d 222, 224

- 25 (5th Cir. 1993); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Accordingly, Cooper’s motion to file a supplemental brief is GRANTED, the motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-31240 Document: 00512446883 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/19/2013
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**WRITTEN
      STATEMENT**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report of China 3C Group
      and
      its subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), the undersigned, Zhenggang Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




October
                31, 2008
            /s/
                Zhenggang WangZhenggang
                WangChief
                Executive Officer and Chairman(Principal
                Executive Officer)
Exhibit 11.1

Calculation of weighted average common shares outstanding for the three
month period ended March 31, 2002.

Sideware Systems Inc.

Beginning Balance                    85,182,513

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Period           No. of Shares     Contribution to   Ending Balance
                   Issued            Weighted Avg.
<S>                <C>               <C>              <C>

Jan. 2002            332,222           321,148          85,503,661

TOTAL                332,222           321,148

</TABLE>


Ending balance:                              85,503,661

Comprehensive loss for the period:           $1,109,241

Net loss per share                           $     0.01