alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           (592)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                       892
<INVENTORY>                                     40,505
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,716
<PP&E>                                         732,648
<DEPRECIATION>                                 271,655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 586,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,769
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    119,790
<COMMON>                                       173,173
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,734)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   586,062
<SALES>                                        289,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               289,489
<CGS>                                          261,484
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  261,484
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,469
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,623
<INCOME-TAX>                                        77
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,546
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,546
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT CREASY, :

:

Plaintiff : NO. 4:04-CV-2296

: (Judge McClure)

 v. :

:

NOVELTY, INC., :

:

Defendant :

O R D E R

April 25, 2005

BACKGROUND: 

The court has before it defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint,

filed January 4, 2005, and plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint, filed March

12, 2005. It appears that defendant’s motion to dismiss prompted plaintiff’s

motion to amend. 

Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a) begins as follows: 

“A party may amend the party’s pleading once as a

matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading

is served . . . .”

Plaintiff appears to have ignored this initial portion of the rule and proceeded to file

a motion for leave of court to file an amended complaint. 

Case 4:04-cv-02296-JFM Document 19 Filed 04/25/05 Page 1 of 3
-2-

However, a motion to dismiss is not a “responsive pleading” within the

meaning of Rule 15. Centifanti v. Nix, 865 F.2d 1422, 1431 n. 9 (3d Cir. 1989). 

Accordingly, plaintiff had an absolute right to amend the complaint at this stage of

the proceeding. 

The court will therefore grant the motion to amend and direct the filing of an

amended complaint. The motion to dismiss thereby becomes moot.

If defendant wishes to file a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, it

should file a new motion and new supporting brief but may incorporate by

reference the exhibits attached to the initial motion to dismiss, to conserve

resources. Defendant may, of course, supplement those exhibits to the extent

deemed appropriate. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to amend plaintiff’s complaint (rec. doc. no. 16,

filed March 12, 2005) is granted. 

2. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on or before May 9, 2005.

3. Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint (rec. doc. no. 6,

Case 4:04-cv-02296-JFM Document 19 Filed 04/25/05 Page 2 of 3
-3-

filed January 4, 2005) is denied as moot. In briefing any subsequent motion to

dismiss the amended complaint, the defendant may incorporate by reference the

exhibits which were attached to the initial motion to dismiss and may attach

supplemental exhibits. 

s/James F. McClure, Jr.

James F. McClure, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-02296-JFM Document 19 Filed 04/25/05 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3013 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3013

   To permanently authorize the exemption of aliens working as fish 
  processors from the numerical limitation on H-2B nonimmigrant visas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 4, 2023

Ms. Murkowski (for herself, Mr. Warner, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Kaine, Mr. 
  Cardin, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Cassidy, and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To permanently authorize the exemption of aliens working as fish 
  processors from the numerical limitation on H-2B nonimmigrant visas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF ALIENS WORKING AS FISH PROCESSORS FROM THE 
              NUMERICAL LIMITATION ON H-2B NONIMMIGRANT VISAS.

    (a) In General.--Section 214(g)(10) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(10)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The numerical limitations of paragraph 
        (1)(B)'' and inserting ``(A) The numerical limitation under 
        paragraph (1)(B)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(B)(i) The numerical limitation under paragraph (1)(B) shall not 
apply to any nonimmigrant alien issued a visa or otherwise provided 
status under section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) who is employed (or has 
received an offer of employment)--
            ``(I) as a fish roe processor, a fish roe technician, or a 
        supervisor of fish roe processing; or
            ``(II) as a fish processor.
    ``(ii) As used in clause (i)--
            ``(I) the term `fish' means fresh or saltwater finfish, 
        mollusks, crustaceans, and all other forms of aquatic animal 
        life, including the roe of such animals, other than marine 
        mammals and birds; and
            ``(II) the term `processor' means any person engaged in the 
        processing of fish, including handling, storing, preparing, 
        heading, eviscerating, shucking, freezing, changing into 
        different market forms, manufacturing, preserving, packing, 
        labeling, dockside unloading, holding, and all other processing 
        activities.''.
    (b) Repeal.--Section 14006 of the Department of Defense 
Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-287) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26628]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Meeting of the Biomedical 
Library Review Committee

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Biomedical Library Review Committee on November 5-6, 1997, 
convening at 8:30 a.m. in the Board Room of the National Library of 
Medicine, Building 38, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland.
    The meeting on November 5 will be open to the public from 8:30 a.m. 
to approximately 11 a.m. for the discussion of administrative reports 
and program developments. Attendance by the public will be limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Dr. Milton Corn at 301-496-4621 two 
weeks before the meeting.
    In accordance with provisions set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the 
meeting on November 5 will be closed to the public for the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of individual grant applications from 11 
a.m. to approximately 5 p.m., and on November 6 from 8:30 a.m. to 
adjournment. These applications and the discussion could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property, such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications, disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Dr. Milton Corn, Acting Associate Director, Extramural Programs, 
National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland 
20894, telephone number: 301-496-4621, will provide summaries of the 
meeting, rosters of the committee members, and other information 
pertaining to the meeting.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879--Medical 
Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: October 1, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-26628 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5062-5063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2614]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee; Open Committee 
Meeting

    According to the provisions of section 10 of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given that meetings of 
the Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee will be held on 
Wednesday, February 5, 1997.
    The meeting will start at 10:45 a.m. and will be held in Room 
5A06A, Office of Personnel Management Building, 1900 E Street, NW., 
Washington, DC.
    The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee is composed of a 
Chair, five representatives from labor unions holding exclusive 
bargaining rights for Federal blue-collar employees, and five 
representatives from Federal agencies. Entitlement to membership on the 
Committee is provided for in 5 U.S.C. 5347.
    The Committee's primary responsibility is to review the Prevailing 
Rate System and other matters pertinent to establishing prevailing 
rates under subchapter IV, chapter 53, 5 U.S.C., as amended, and from 
time to time advise the Office of Personnel Management.
    These scheduled meetings will start in open session with both labor 
and management representatives attending. During the meeting either the 
labor members or the management members may caucus separately with the 
Chair to devise strategy and formulate positions. Premature disclosure 
of the matters discussed in these caucuses would unacceptably impair 
the ability of the Committee to reach a consensus on the matters being 
considered and would disrupt substantially the disposition of

[[Page 5063]]

its business. Therefore, these caucuses will be closed to the public 
because of a determination made by the Director of the Office of 
Personnel Management under the provisions of section 10(d) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(9)(B). These caucuses may, depending on the issues involved, 
constitute a substantial portion of the meeting.
    Annually, the Chair compiles a report of pay issues discussed and 
concluded recommendations. These reports are available to the public, 
upon written request to the Committee's Secretary.
    The public is invited to submit material in writing to the Chair on 
Federal Wage System pay matters felt to be deserving of the Committee's 
attention. Additional information on these meetings may be obtained by 
contacting the Committee's Secretary, Office of Personnel Management, 
Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee, Room 5559, 1900 E Street 
NW., Washington, DC 20415 (202) 606-1500.

    Dated: January 27, 1997.
Phyllis G. Foley,
Chair, Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 97-2614 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M
**Exhibit
      32**


**Herborium
      Group, Inc.**


**Certification
      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Herborium Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Agnes Olszewski,
      Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





*Date* :
      July
      23, 2007




*/s/Agnes
                Olszewski**Agnes
                Olszewski*
              *Chief
                Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and*
              *Chief
                Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)*




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The INSURANCE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., Appellant, v. William H. WASHINGTON, Sr., Appellee.

Nos. 76-1956, 76-1957.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1977.

*744Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Knight and A. Blackwell Stieglitz, Miami, for appellant.

David Goldman, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Alexander v. First National Bank of Titusville,*275 So.2d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2


                            [INTERVISUAL LETTERHEAD]



Via:  Overnight mail and Fax: 011-852-2664-7066



                                 March 29, 2000

Zindart Limited
Flat C&D, 25/F., Block 1
Taiping Industrial Centre
57 Ting Kok Road
Tai Po, N. T.
Hong Kong
Attn: Feather S. Y. Fok

               Re:    EXTENSION NOTICE.

Dear Feather:

               Please consider this notice that as per Section 2.6 of the Loan
and Security Agreement dated as of May 13, 1999, Intervisual Books, Inc. hereby
extends the committed revolving line until May 13, 2001 in the amount of
$2,300,000.

Sincerely,

                                            /s/ DAN REAVIS


                                            Dan Reavis
                                            Executive VP/CFO

cc:     ChinaVest
        Stephen Cooke, Paul Hastings, Janosfsky & Walker LLP
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52177-52178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26378]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA, Inc. Joint Special Committee 182; Minimum Operational 
Performance Standards (MOPS) for an Avionics Computer Resource

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for Special 
Committee (SC)-182 meeting to be held October 22-24, 1997, starting at 
9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1140 Connecticut Avenue, 
N.W., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.
    The agenda will include: (1) Chairman's Introductory Remarks; (2) 
Review and Approval of Meeting Reports: a. Previous Joint Meeting; b. 
Working Group 48 Meeting; (3) SC-182 Work Program and Schedule: a. Is 
the need for an ACR MOPS real? b. Are equipment manufacturers committed 
to the concept? c. Development of a schedule to complete the MOPS not 
later than December 1998, if interest prevails. (4) Comments to MOPS 
Draft 1.0 (Web Site: <a href="http://forums.americas.digital.com/avf/RTCA.SC182/
dispatch.cgi">http://forums.americas.digital.com/avf/RTCA.SC182/
dispatch.cgi</a>): Document Forums; Minimum Operational Performance 
Standards Draft Version of MOPS; MOPS 1.0 (Reformatted); (5) Discussion 
papers: a. Operation Goals and Applications (Web Site: Same as Above); 
Discussion forums; Certification/ Qualification Issues #3 Operational 
Goals and Applications; b. ARINC 653 APEX Partition Testing (Web Site: 
Same as Above); Discussion Forums; Architecture/System Services #7 Apex 
Partition Testing; (6) Status Report: a. Architecture/ System Services 
Working Group; b. Capacity and Performance Working Group; (7) Working 
Group Sessions; (8) working Group Reports; (9) Other Business; (10) 
Date and Place of Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interest public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1020, Washington, DC,

[[Page 52178]]

20036; (202) 833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or <a href="http://
www.rtca.org">http://
www.rtca.org</a> (web site). Members of the public may present a written 
statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 26, 1997.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 97-26378 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### Victor Eugene CLEMONS, Appellant, v. Sue Ellen Clemons MORRIS and Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Appellees.

No. 76-2596.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 4, 1977.

Theodore K. Egner, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Steven Squire, of Miller, Squire & Brav-erman, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee, Sue Ellen Clemons Morris.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

The question on appeal is whether Section 61.12, Florida Statutes (1975), applies to *judgments*for alimony, suit money and child support as well as *orders*for the same. *Hall v. Air Force Finance Center, etc.,*344 So.2d 1340, 1343 (Fla.1st DCA 1977), an*520swers the question. Sub judice, the mother obtained a foreign judgment against the father for child support and sued in Florida to make the foreign judgment a Florida judgment and then to garnish his salary. The husband defended by saying Section 61.12, Florida Statutes (1975), only applied to orders and not to judgments. We like the First District Court of Appeal in *Hall, supra,*hold that Section 61.12, Florida Statutes (1975), applies to judgments for alimony, suit money and child support, as well as orders for the same.

Appellant cites *Noyes v. Cooper,*216 So.2d 799 (Fla.3d DCA 1968), as authority but we have considered *De Castro v. De Castro,*334 So.2d 834 (Fla.3rd DCA 1976), as limiting that holding because the court somehow determined *Noyes v. Cooper, supra,*had to do with sums due under a property settlement.

The Order denying Defendant’s Motion for disallowance and/or dissolution of garnishment and the Final Judgment in garnishment, both entered below, are AFFIRMED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and LETTS, J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51656-51657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5902-6]


Availability of FY 96 Grant Performance Report for Georgia

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability of grantee performance evaluation 
report.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA's grant regulations (40 CFR 35.150) require the Agency to 
evaluate the performance of agencies which receive grants. EPA's 
regulations for regional consistency (40 CFR 56.7) require that the 
Agency notify the public of the availability of the reports

[[Page 51657]]

of such evaluations. EPA recently performed an end-of-year evaluation 
of one state air pollution control program (Georgia Environmental 
Protection Division). This audit was conducted to assess the agency's 
performance under the grant made to them by EPA pursuant to section 105 
of the Clean Air Act. EPA Region 4, has prepared a report for the state 
of Georgia identified above and is now available for public inspection.

ADDRESSES: The report may be examined at the EPA's Region 4 office, 61 
Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, in the Air, Pesticides, and 
Toxics Management Division.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Thomas, (404) 562-9064, at the 
above Region 4 address.

    Dated: September 24, 1997.
Michael V. Peyton,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-26184 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00380-CV

IN RE E.H.R., JR., a Child

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA01921

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against appellant in relation to this appeal 

because appellant qualifies as indigent under TEX. R. APP. P. 20.

SIGNED November 27, 2019.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice