alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| INTEGRITY MUTUALFUNDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | Exhibit 32.2 |
|----------------------------------------------|--------------|

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. (the"Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, asfiled with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), I, Heather Ackerman, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1)          the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

 

(2)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  March 16, 2007 | By /s/ Heather Ackerman |
|----------------------------|-------------------------|
|                       |                    |
|                       | Heather Ackerman        |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 51272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25683]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Chapter 1


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Small Entity Compliance Guide

AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Small Entity Compliance Guide.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document is issued under the joint authority of the 
Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of General Services and the 
Administrator for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration as 
the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Council. This Small Entity 
Compliance Guide has been prepared in accordance with Section 212 of 
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 
104-121). It consists of a summary of the rule appearing in Federal 
Acquisition Circular (FAC) 97-02 which amends the FAR. Further 
information regarding this rule may be obtained by referring to FAC 97-
02 which precedes this notice. This document may be obtained from the 
Internet at http://www.arnet.gov/far.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Fayson, FAR Secretariat, (202) 
501-4755.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Part 15 Rewrite; Contracting by Negotiation and Competitive Range 
Determination [FAC 97-02, FAR Case 95-029]

    The final rule revises Part 15, Contracting by Negotiation. The 
final rule infuses innovative techniques into the source selection 
process, simplifies the acquisition process, incorporates changes in 
pricing and unsolicited proposal policy, and facilitates the 
acquisition of best value products and services. The final rule 
emphasizes the use of effective and efficient acquisition methods and 
eliminates unnecessary burdens imposed on industry and Government. In 
addition, the rule revises the sequence in which Part 15 information is 
presented to facilitate use of the regulation.

    Dated: September 22, 1997.
Edward C. Loeb,
Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 97-25683 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
EXHIBIT (32.1)(A)
        103
  
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of United Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Evelyn F. Smalls, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '1350, as adopted pursuant to '906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Evelyn F. Smalls
 
 Evelyn F. Smalls
 Chief Executive Officer
 April 16, 2012
         104
#### Derry Lynn BEARDEN et al. v. Joseph RUCKER et al.

No. 11665.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Dec. 28, 1977.

*517Roy Maughan, Baton Rouge, of counsel, for plaintiffs-appellants.

John Swanner, Baton Rouge, of counsel, for defendants-appellees.

Before LANDRY, SARTAIN and ELLIS, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge:

This is a suit for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiffs are Derry Lynn Bear-den, individually and as natural tutrix of her minor son, Ricky Bearden, and Polly Christian, Mrs. Bearden's mother. Defendants are Joseph Rucker, Cavalier Insurance Company, his insurer, and Gulf Insurance Company, which is alleged to be the uninsured motorist insurer of plaintiffs.

Gulf filed a motion for summary judgment, alleging that it afforded no coverage to plaintiffs. After a hearing, judgment was rendered dismissing the suit as to plaintiffs and they have appealed.

From documents filed in support of the motion, we learn that Mrs. Bearden separated from her husband in January, 1976, and moved into an apartment at 655 Sharp Road, Baton Rouge. Judgment of separation from bed and board was signed on June 9, 1976, in which Mrs. Bearden was awarded custody of Ricky. Since January, 1976, Mrs. Bearden, Ricky and Mrs. Christian have resided together at the Sharp Road address. Mr. Bearden has lived at 9285 West Darryl Parkway, Baton Rouge.

The policy in question was issued on April 27, 1976, and was in effect at the time of the accident. Three automobiles are covered by the policy, including a 1969 Chevrolet Impala, which, according to her counter affidavit, is Mrs. Bearden’s personal car. The record is silent as to whether there has been a community settlement between the parties, or any formal transfer of title to any of the insured vehicles following the separation. Mrs. Bearden alleges in her affidavit that it was intended that she be covered by the policy.

Gulf claims that there is no uninsured motorist coverage under the policy because Mrs. Bearden is not a named insured, and is not a resident of the same household as Mr. Bearden. However, even if this contention is correct, it is not dispositive of the case.

If it is true that Mrs. Bearden is the owner-operator of the 1969 Impala, and that it was intended that coverage be afforded her by the policy, the policy can be reformed to conform to the original intention of the parties. *Herbert v. Breaux,*285 So.2d 829 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1973); *Perry*v. Law, 334 So.2d 523 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1976).

Summary judgment should not be granted unless it clearly appears that the mover is entitled to it as a matter of fact and law. There are facts alleged, over and above those relied on by defendant, which, *518if true, could defeat defendant’s policy defense. There is, therefore, a dispute as to material facts, and summary judgment is not appropriate. Articles 966, 967, Code of Civil Procedure.

The judgment appealed from is therefore reversed, and the case remanded to the trial court for trial on its merits. All costs of this appeal shall be paid by Gulf Insurance Company. All other costs shall await final disposition of the case on its merits.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
#### Robert KOWSLOWSKY, Appellant, v. Rudolph M. ARSENICOS and Broward Aire Apartments, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 69-325.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### Summary of data on temperature of streams in North Carolina, 1943-67

By: Thomas H. Woodard

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1895A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (1989 pdf)                        
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Albert BETHEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-125.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 8, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of TranSwitch Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Santanu Das,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                        /s/ Dr. Santanu Das
                                        -------------------
                                        Dr. Santanu Das
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        August 12, 2003
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1749 

To reinstate the application of the wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon 

Act to Federal contracts in areas affected by Hurricane Katrina. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2005 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. REID, Mr. 

DURBIN, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. DODD, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. 

BINGAMAN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. REED, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. 

KERRY, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. AKAKA, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mrs. BOXER, 

Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. BAYH, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CORZINE, Mr. DAYTON, 

Mr. LAUTENBERG, and Mr. OBAMA) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To reinstate the application of the wage requirements of 

the Davis-Bacon Act to Federal contracts in areas affected by Hurricane Katrina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Wages for Hurri5 cane Katrina Recovery Workers Act’’. 
2 

•S 1749 IS

1 SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF DAVIS-BACON WAGE REQUIRE2 MENTS. 

3 Notwithstanding the proclamation by the President 

4 dated September 8, 2005, or any other provision of law, 

5 the provisions of subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, 

6 United States Code (and the provisions of all other related 

7 Acts to the extent they depend upon a determination by 

8 the Secretary of Labor under section 3142 of such title, 

9 whether or not the President has the authority to suspend 

10 the operation of such provisions), shall apply to all con11 tracts to which such provisions would otherwise apply that 

12 are entered into on or after the date of enactment of this 

13 Act, to be performed in the counties affected by Hurricane 

14 Katrina and described in such proclamation. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.1 - Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of RPM Advantage, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report").

I, David R. Pressler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David R. Pressler
--------------------------
    David R. Pressler
    CEO President and Director


Date  April 25, 2011
      -----------------
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 177 (Friday, September 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48120-48121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Appointments to Performance Review Boards for Senior Executive 
Service

AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Appointment to Performance Review Boards for Senior Executive 
Service.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has announced the 
following appointments to the NRC Performance Review Boards. The 
appointments were recently published

[[Page 48121]]

but are being republished to indicate several changes in the 
membership.
    The following individuals are appointed as members of the NRC 
Performance Review Board (PRB) responsible for making recommendations 
to the appointing and awarding authorities on performance appraisal 
ratings and performance awards for Senior Executives:

Patricia G. Norry, Deputy Executive Director for Management Services
Richard L. Bangart, Director, Office of State Programs
Stephen G. Burns, Associate General Counsel, Office of the General 
Counsel
Guy P. Caputo, Director, Office of Investigations
James E. Dyer, Deputy Regional Administration, Region IV
Jesse L. Funches, Chief Financial Officer
Edward L. Halman, Director, Office of Administration
Malcolm R. Knapp, Deputy Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety 
and Safeguards
Joseph A. Murphy, Division Director, Office of Nuclear Regulatory 
Research
Marylee M. Slosson, Deputy Division Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
Regulation
Roy P. Zimmerman, Associate Director for Projects, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation

    The following individuals will serve as members of the NRC PRB 
Panel that was established to review appraisals and make 
recommendations to the appointing and awarding authorities for NRC PRB 
members:

Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Deputy Executive Director for Regulatory 
Programs
Karen D. Cyr, General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel
Ashok C. Thadani, Acting Deputy Executive Director for Regulatory 
Effectiveness

    All appointments are made pursuant to Section 4314 of Chapter 43 of 
Title 5 of the United States Code.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 12, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolyn J. Swanson, Secretary, 
Executive Resources Board, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, DC 20555, (301) 415-7103.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day of September 1997.

    For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Carolyn J. Swanson,
Secretary, Executive Resources Board.
[FR Doc. 97-24217 Filed 9-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
of TransTexas Gas Corporation ("Company") on Form S-3 (File No. 33-91494) of our
reserve report dated February 1, 1997 ("Reserve Report"), and to the references
to our name under the caption "Experts" and elsewhere in the form and context in
which it appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the
references to our Reserve Report and to our name in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 1997 in the form and context
in which they appear.
 
                                        NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
 
Houston, Texas
May 1, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26753]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-2-28-000]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

October 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on October 1, 1997, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A to 
the filing, to become effective November 1, 1997.
    Panhandle states that this filing is made in accordance with 
Section 24 (Fuel Reimbursement Adjustment) of the General Terms and 
conditions in Panhandle's FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1. 
The revised tariff sheets filed herewith reflect the following changes 
to the Fuel Reimbursement Percentages:
    (1) A 0.15% increase in the Gathering Fuel Reimbursement 
Percentage;
    (2) A 0.15% increase in the Field Zone Fuel Reimbursement 
Percentage;
    (3) A 0.02% increase in the Market Zone Fuel Reimbursement 
Percentage;
    (4) A 0.21% increase in the Injection and no change in the 
Withdrawal Field Area Storage Reimbursement Percentages; and
    (5) A 0.21% increase in the Injection and a 0.21% increase in the 
Withdrawal Market Area Storage Reimbursement Percentages.
    Panhandle states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers and applicable state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protect this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26753 Filed 10-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SAMUEL MENDEZ, )

Plaintiff, )

)

V. ) Civil Action No. 05-35 E

P.A. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 2006, upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s 

Motion to Sustain Complaint (Document No. 54) 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the said motion is DENIED and the Order 

entered on May 17, 2006 be and hereby is AFFIRMED

S/Sean J. McLaughlin 

Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: all parties of record.nmk

Case 1:05-cv-00035-SJM-SPB Document 56 Filed 06/16/06 Page 1 of 1
#### LONDON PROPERTIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. L. C. (Cavit) TOPAKOGLU, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 3080.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 18, 1970.

*260Mouton, Beard, Plaisance & Franques, by Caliste Beard, Jr., Lafayette, for defendant-appellant.

Bean & Rush, by Warren D. Rush, Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellee.

*On Motion to Dismiss Appeal*

En Banc.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, London Properties, Inc., obtained a judgment of eviction against defendant L. C. (Cavit) Topakoglu, on November 10, 1969. The defendant moved for and was granted a suspensive appeal from that judgment. Plaintiff then moved to dismiss the suspensive appeal on several grounds, and the motion is before us now on that motion to dismiss the appeal.

The judgment of eviction was rendered on November 3, 1969, and was read aloud and signed in open court on November 10, 1969. A motion for a new trial was filed by defendant on November 17, 1969. Judgment was rendered on January 29, 1970, and was read aloud and signed by the trial court on February 4, 1970, denying the motion for new trial. A certified copy of the judgment denying the motion for new trial was served on defendant’s attorney on February 13, 1970.

Defendant filed a motion for a suspen-sive appeal on February 19, 1970, and he furnished an appeal bond on that date. An order of suspensive appeal was granted, and the record was lodged in this court on February 27. The pending motion to dismiss that appeal was filed on March 4, 1970.

Plaintiff contends primarily that the sus-pensive appeal should be dismissed because of defendant’s failure to apply for such an appeal and to file an appeal bond within twenty-four hours after the rendition of the judgment of eviction.

LSA-C.C.P. Art. 4735 provides:

> “An appeal does not suspend execution of a judgment of eviction unless the defendant has answered the rule under oath, pleading an affirmative defense entitling him to retain possession of the premises, and the appeal has been applied for and the appeal bond filed within twenty-four hours after the rendition of the judgment of eviction. The amount of the suspensive bond shall be determined by the court in an amount sufficient to protect the appellee against all such damage as he may sustain as a result of the appeal.”

In the instant suit the appeal was not applied for and the appeal bond was not filed within twenty-four hours after the rendition, or the reading and signing, of the judgment. Under the clear provisions of LSA-C.C.P. Art. 4735, the appeal was filed too late to suspend the execution of the judgment of eviction. Plaintiff thus is entitled to have the suspensive appeal dismissed. Downey v. Bellue, 178 So.2d 778 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1965).

A devolutive appeal was neither requested nor ordered. The motion for the appeal and the order granting it are specifically limited to a suspensive appeal. The appeal taken by defendant, therefore, must be dismissed. Sarpy v. de la Houssaye, 217 So. 2d 783 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1969).

For the reasons assigned, the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed at defendant-appellant’s costs.

Appeal dismissed.