alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department

of Transportation

Federal Aviation

Administration

Small Airplane Directorate

Wichita Aircraft Certification 

Office

1801 Airport Road, Room 100

Wichita, Kansas 67209

May 1, 2011 L115W-11-315 Revision 1

Mr. Glenn Mores

President

Commander Owners Group

21921 Oak Leaf Lane

Bullard, TX 75757

Subject: Global Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC) to Airworthiness Directive 

(AD) 2011-07-13 paragraph (g) “inspection and repairs” – Proposing a different

method of inspection to inspect the outboard elevator hinge brackets and the 

elevator spar behind the bracket for cracks

Reference: (1) AD 2011-07-13 – on CPAC Inc Commander Models 112, 112B, 112TC, 114, 

114A, 114B, and 114TC

(2) Commander Owners Group (COG) email dated April 18, 2011 requesting an

AMOC to AD 2011-07-13 paragraph (g)-proposing an alternate method for 

inspection.

 (3) Commander Owners Group (COG) email dated April 28, 2011 requesting to 

revise the AMOC in Ref, 2 above in order to include details on borescopes 

 used for inspection

Dear Mr. Mores:

This letter revises L115W-11-315 dated April 20, 2011 in response to your request in 

Reference 3 above. Appendix A to this letter is also revised and all the information you sent 

regarding the borescopes is included in Section 3 of the Appendix A (Rev. 1) as per your 

request.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) received your proposal dated April 18, 2011, 

proposing an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) to paragraph (g) of Airworthiness 

Directive (AD) 2011-07-13. The Wichita Aircraft Certification Office has reviewed your 

proposal for a global AMOC to paragraph (g) of AD 2011-07-13 proposing an alternate 

method of inspection to check the elevator spar in and around and behind the outboard 

elevator hinge bracket for cracks. We find the method of inspection satisfactory and approve 

your AMOC proposal. The approved method of inspection is described in the Appendix A

(Revision 1) to this letter.

ROUTING SYMBOL

DATE

FAA Form 1360-14.1 (6-89) OFFICIAL FILE COPY  U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1995 - 769-211

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Page 2

Before using this AMOC, which is transferable to owners of other CPAC Inc. Commander 

airplanes affected by this AD, each owner should notify their appropriate Principal Inspector 

(PI) in the Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, their local FSDO. All 

provisions of AD 2011-07-13 that are not specifically referenced above remain fully

applicable and must be complied with accordingly. If in the future the Wichita ACO or 

Small Airplane Directorate determines that this AMOC does not provide an acceptable level 

of safety, then these authorities may revoke or revise the terms of the AMOC following 

notice to the requestor and a seven-day opportunity for the requester to comment on the 

revocation or proposed action.

If you have any questions, please contact T.N. Baktha at (316) 946 4155. 

Sincerely,

William C. Schinstock

Associate ACO Manager, Airframe & Services

Wichita Aircraft Certification Office
#### Michael B. DORSEY v. ADMINISTRATOR, Louisiana DEPT. OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY and Sears Roebuck & Co.

No. 61488.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 3, 1978.

In re: Michael B. Dorsey applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of *550Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 353 So.2d 363.

Writ denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TransDigm Holding
Company (the Company) for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended March 27, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, W. Nicholas Howley, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results of operations of the
Company for the periods indicated.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|



Date: May 5, 2004



/s/    W. Nicholas HowleyName: W. Nicholas Howley Title: President,
Chief Executive Officer and          Director (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 10.2  AMENDMENT TO STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENTS  ThisAMENDMENT TO STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT(this Amendment Agreement) by and betweenIA GLOBAL, INC.,a Delaware corporation (the Company), and Inter Asset Japan LBO No.1 Fund (Voluntary Partnership) (the Purchaser) is entered into as of November 4, 2009.  WHEREAS, the Company and Purchaser entered into Stock Purchase Agreements on August 2, 2009 and August 17, 2009 (Stock Purchase Agreements).  WHEREAS, the Purchaser agreed to invest $2,410,000 with an option to invest an addition $2 million in the Company subject to the terms and conditions included in the Stock Purchase Agreements.  WHEREAS, the Company and Purchaser have agreed to this Amendment Agreement.  NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties hereby agree to the following amendments:  III.
        REGISTRATION RIGHTS/ NYSE AMEX APPROVAL
  3.1NYSE Amex Registration.  IV.
        REGISTRATION RIGHTS/ NYSE AMEX APPROVAL
  4.1NYSE Amex Registration.  Purchaser agrees that only 19.9% of 219,453,289 or 43,631,144 shares of common stock can be issued until shareholder approval of the Stock Purchase Agreements is obtained at the next Stockholder Meeting, which is currently scheduled for December 18, 2009.  This November 4, 2009 Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreements, the August 2, 2009 Stock Purchase Agreement and the August 17, 2009 Stock Purchase Agreement  represent the entire agreements  of the Company and Purchaser with respect to the matters set forth herein. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreements, the Stock Purchase Agreements dated August 2, 2009 and August 17, 2009 remain in full force and effect.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year set forth below.  IA Global, Inc.  /s/ Mark Scott  By: Mark E. Scott Title: Chief Financial Officer  Inter Asset Japan LBO No.1 Fund (Voluntary Partnership)  /s/ Hiroki Isobe  By: Hiroki Isobe Title:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DUANE BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2104

[October 24, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Laura Johnson, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 50-2002-CF-010444-AXXX-MB.

Duane Brown, Graceville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   87,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,174
<INVENTORY>                                     63,496
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,512
<PP&E>                                          25,064
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,522
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 194,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,197
<BONDS>                                         64,104
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   194,179
<SALES>                                        406,937
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               406,937
<CGS>                                          341,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  341,443
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   773
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,318
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,618
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,700
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 185 (Wednesday, September 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25291]



[[Page 49969]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-434-001]


Transwestern Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

September 18, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 15, 1997, Transwestern Pipeline 
Company (Transwestern), tendered for filing to become part of 
Transwestern's FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the 
following tariff sheet proposed to become effective on September 1, 
1997:

Substitute Original Sheet No. 37E

    Transwestern states that this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's August 29, 1997 Order in Docket No. RP97-434-000 
pertaining to Transwestern's new interruptible Park 'N Ride Service 
under Rate Schedule PNR. The August 29 Order requires Transwestern to 
revise Section 9.1 of its tariff to provide that notice be given to 
Buyers via telephone and the Electronic Bulletin Board (EBB) for 
notices issued after business hours for the next calendar day.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C., 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. All 
protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make Protestant a party to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25291 Filed 9-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 51824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26250]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-205, RM-9161]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Perry, FL

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by Frank 
Vela proposing the allotment of Channel 228A to Perry, Florida, as that 
community's second local FM broadcast service. There is a site 
restriction .8 kilometers (.5 miles) east of the community at 
coordinates 30-07-00 and 83-34-26.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before November 17, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before December 2, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC. 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, as follows: Frank Vela, 8740 W. Varricchio Lane, 
Crystal River, Florida 34428.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-205, adopted September 17, 
1997, and released September 26, 1997. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, 
NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 
20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-26250 Filed 10-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350)

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Empyrean Holdings, Inc., a Nevadacorporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,Robert L. Lee, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

/s/ Robert L. Lee 

Robert L. Lee,

President and Director

 

Dated: May10, 2007

----

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350)

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Empyrean Holdings, Inc., a Nevadacorporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,William Melchiori, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to myknowledge: 

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

/s/ William Melchiori 

William Melchiori

Chief Financial Officer andDirector

 

Dated: May10, 2007
----

| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  July 15, 2011  | By:    | /s/ Li Kin Shing                                               |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   | Li Kin Shing                                              |   |
|                                 |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26488]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-539-000]


Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes

October 1, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 26, 1997, Northern Border Pipeline 
Company (Northern Border) tendered for filing to become part of 
Northern Border Pipeline Company's FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to become effective November 
1, 1997:

Second Revised Sheet Number 283

    Northern Border states that it proposes to revise Method A of the 
Bid evaluation methods and to clarify certain factors in the Method A 
formula. Northern Border further states that the proposed change to Bid 
evaluation Method A provides a wider range of Bid evaluation 
alternatives.
    Northern Border states that copies of this filing have been sent to 
all of Northern Border's contracted shippers and interested state 
regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sec. 385.214 and Sec. 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26488 Filed 10-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1

Fellner, Christian

From: Higgins, Cortney <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:33 AM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Cc: Hutson, Nick; Elman, Barry

Subject: Comments on Revised Mods/Reconstructed Package

Hi all,

Here are interagency comments on the revised mods/reconstructed package – let me know if you have questions:

Preamble

Pg 40 – Strike ‘USGRP “Climate Change Impacts” assessment’ and replace with National Climate Assessment.      

Pg. 56, paragraph 1, newly added text “The purpose of the reconstruction provision is to discourage the perpetuation of

a facility, instead of replacing it at the end of its useful life with a newly constructed affected facility.”  Should the

purpose of the reconstruction provision be to “encourage” rather than “discourage” the perpetuation of a facility, rather

than replacing it with a newly constructed facility?

p. 67, regarding a prior comment (A27) on the sources that you are not proposing standards for: Thank you for the clarifications. 

However, these do not help resolve the question. First, since we don’t have any new TSD text in hand it is difficult to assess what the 

resolution would be. To be clear, it seems that the former TSD reg text is more clear and the language here, that includes boilers and 

IGCC, may be overbroad in terms of soliciting comment. Second, you have added the new element about “intent” for boilers when 

they were first constructed. This seems like it could invite differing interpretations. If you do keep the preamble text it would be good 

to be more explicit about the fact you are soliciting comment on this decision. 

RIA Ch 9

Pg. 9‐6, paragraph 1:  changed text from “reliability” to “resource adequacy”.  Has EPA considered the implications of

the recon/mod rule on other aspects of reliability, such as availability of ancillary services?  If so, please include that

information in the text.  If not, please note that this has not been considered to be clear; moreover, suggest that this be

considered before the rule is finalized.

Pg. 9‐7, paragraph 1:  same comment as above re changed text from “reliability” to “resource adequacy”.

Pg. 9‐7, footnote 3:  added text referencing comments received.  Suggest clarifying where these comments came from

(i.e., interagency review?) because this rule has not yet been released for public comment.

________________________________________________

Cortney Higgins, PhD 

Policy Analyst 

OMB/OIRA/NRE 

202.395.7856 

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
Exhibit 10.02


                                                           5,000,000 SHARES
                                                            OF COMMON STOCK

                           PLASTICS MFG. COMPANY
                          A WISCONSIN CORPORATION
                           W188 N11707 MAPLE ROAD
                        GERMANTOWN, WISCONSIN 53022

                                STOCK OPTION

     For value received, MARK SELLERS AND ASSIGNS, the Optionee of this
 Option contract (the "Option"), may call upon PLASTICS MFG. COMPANY, the
 Optionor of this Option, to sell to the Optionee Five Million (5,000,000)
 shares of the Common Stock (the "Shares") of PLASTICS MFG. COMPANY (the
 "Corporation") at a price of $12.00 per share (the "Strike Price").

     1.   EXERCISE.  This Option can be exercised only on or before
 December 31, 2011. Exercise may be made in a series of exercised steps,
 but not less than 10,000 shares may be exercised at any one time.

     2.   EXPIRATION.  The expiration date of the Option is December 31,
 2011.

     3.   PRESENTMENT.  This Option must be presented to the Optionor at
 the time of exercise of this Option. This Option must be exercised in
 writing.

     4.   CONDITIONS.  This Option is subject to the terms and conditions
 on the reverse side hereof.

     5.   COMMITMENT.  The Optionor agrees to carry out and perform all of
 the obligations of this Option, in accordance with the terms and
 conditions hereof.

     Dated this 2nd day of January, 2002.

                              PLASTICS MFG. COMPANY, OPTIONOR



                              By:  MARK G. SELLERS
                                   Mark G. Sellers, President