### 58849 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 166 / Friday, August 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

instructions of the COTP or his designated representative and proceed at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course while in the

zone.

(4) The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the security zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.

(d) Notice of enforcement. The COTP will cause notice of the enforcement of the security zone described in this section to be made by verbal broadcasts and written notice to mariners and the general public.

(e) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the COTP to assist in enforcing the security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section.

Dated: August 16, 2016. M.C. Long, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2016–20530 Filed 8–25–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 9110–04–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R01–OAR–2015–0402; FRL–9945–13– Region 1]** 

**Air Plan Approval; Rhode Island; Infrastructure State Implementation**  **Plan Requirements for Particle Matter, Ozone, Lead, Nitrogen Dioxide and**  **Sulfur Dioxide**

Correction

In rule document 2016–08913, appearing on pages 23175–23180 in the issue of Wednesday, April 20, 2016, make the following correction:

On page 23177, in the first column, in the first paragraph following the table, lines 1–23, should read as follows:

In the above table, the key is as follows: A Approve A* Approve, but conditionally approve

aspect of PSD program relating to the identification of NO X as a precursor for ozone and addressing the changes made to 40 CFR part 51.116 in EPA’s October 20, 2010 rulemaking (75 FR 64864) concerning emissions of fine particulate. D Disapprove, but no further action

required because federal regulations already in place. + Not germane to infrastructure SIPs. NI Not included in the September 10, 2008

(PM 2.5 ), January 2, 2013 (ozone and NO 2 ), and May 30, 2013 (SO 2 ) submittals which are the subject of today’s action. NT Not taking action in today’s action. NS No Submittal. NA Not applicable.

[FR Doc. C1–2016–08913 Filed 8–25–16; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 1505–01–D**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R02–OAR–2016–0320; FRL–9951–49– Region 2]** 

**Partial Approval and Partial Disapproval of Air Quality**  **Implementation Plans; New York; Interstate Transport Infrastructure SIP**  **Requirements for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is partially approving and partially disapproving elements of a New York State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal pertaining to the infrastructure requirements of section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). The infrastructure requirements are designed to ensure that the structural components of each state’s air quality management program are adequate to meet the state’s responsibilities under the CAA. This action pertains specifically to infrastructure requirements concerning interstate transport provisions.

**DATES :**  This rule is effective on September 26, 2016.

**ADDRESSES :**  The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R02–OAR–2016–0320. All documents in the docket are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or please contact the person identified in the **FOR**
**FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** section for additional information.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Kenneth Fradkin, 212–637–3702, fradkin.kenneth@epa.gov

. **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Throughout this document, ‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’, and ‘‘our’’ means EPA.
I. Background II. What action did EPA propose on the SIP submission? III. What comments did EPA receive in response to its proposal? IV. What action is EPA taking? V. What are the consequences of a disapproved SIP? VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background

This rulemaking addresses CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) requirements in New York’s infrastructure SIP submitted on April 4, 2013 to address applicable infrastructure requirements with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS.

The requirement for states to make a SIP submission of this type arises out of CAA section 110(a)(1). Pursuant to section 110(a)(1), states must make SIP submissions ‘‘within 3 years (or such shorter period as the Administrator may prescribe) after the promulgation of a national primary ambient air quality standard (or any revision thereof),’’ and these SIP submissions are to provide for the ‘‘implementation, maintenance, and enforcement’’ of such NAAQS. The statute directly imposes on states the duty to make these SIP submissions, and the requirement to make the submissions is not conditioned upon EPA’s taking any action other than promulgating a new or revised NAAQS. Section 110(a)(2) includes a list of specific elements that ‘‘[e]ach such plan’’ submission must address. EPA commonly refers to such state plans as ‘‘infrastructure SIPs.’’ In particular, section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) requires SIPs to include provisions prohibiting any source or other type of emissions activity in one state from contributing significantly to nonattainment of the NAAQS (commonly referred to as prong 1), or interfering with maintenance of the NAAQS (prong 2), in any another state. Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) requires SIPs to include provisions prohibiting any source or other type of emissions activity in one state from interfering with measures required to prevent significant deterioration (PSD) of air quality (prong 3) and to protect visibility (prong 4) in another state. This rulemaking addresses prongs 1, 2, and 4 of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i). EPA will address the other portions of the April 4, 2013 infrastructure SIP submittal, including prong 3 pertaining to CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), in another action. II. What action did EPA propose on the SIP submission?

The proposed rulemaking associated with this final action was published on June 21, 2016 (81 FR 40229). In that action, EPA proposed to disapprove the portions of New York’s April 4, 2013