alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
109 STAT. 766 PUBLIC LAW 104–68—DEC. 22, 1995

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2481 (S. 1315):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104–414 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):

Dec. 18, considered and passed House.

Dec. 20, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–68

104th Congress

An Act

To designate the Federal Triangle Project under construction at 14th Street and

Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest, in the District of Columbia, as the ‘‘Ronald

Reagan Building and International Trade Center’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal Triangle Project under construction at 14th Street

and Pennsylvania Avenue, Northwest, in the District of Columbia,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ronald Reagan Building

and International Trade Center’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the building referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Ronald

Reagan Building and International Trade Center’’.

Approved December 22, 1995.

40 USC 1101

note.

40 USC 1101

note.

Dec. 22, 1995

[H.R. 2481]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     NOV-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                 1,216,238
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                          1,121,686
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       2,337,924
<PP&E>                                    11,465
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,771
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         2,347,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  1,129,851
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   1,268
<OTHER-SE>                             1,355,555
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           2,347,898
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          23,970
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         159,073
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (136,848)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 625
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            (137,473)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.01)


</TABLE>
fly 10 the 

### tim point of intended landing 

### and. 

### assuming normal cruising :!peed. (1) duri ng 

### the day, 

### 10 fly 

### alter that 

## tor at leQst 

### 30 minutes 

### [emphasis added) .

'l ,_ '1f J:S 

### the CVI.J h 

# ' S9Ciion 91 . 203(a) p r o h ibits, i n pe rti nent p art, 

## any parson from operating 

## a civi l a i rcraft unless it has within It ( 1 ) on app r opriate and cu rrent airwol1hiness certificate ; and ( 2 ) an effective U .S. reg istration oanifi c ate i ssued to

**s** owner o r, tor ope r atiOn w i th i n the U n it ed S tates , 

### the secon d copy 

## ot the Ai r craft reg istratiOn Applicati o n 

## as provided tor I n § 

### 47 . 31 (c ). "'" 1

**"~** mp n · n<;ucstcd for th

**~** .:1

**~** '"tf n • ( ' 1t 

### w·(_ th Phantom 

### :! dOC' 1( 

### t ", rlf ' <, 

### Section 9t.203(b) prescribes. i n pertinent part_ that 

### no person may operate a civil aircraff unless 

### the 

### airwonhinoss certifica!e or a 

### special flight authortZatiOn issued under§ 

### 91 .71 5 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so 

### that " 

### is legible 10 

### passengers or crew . 5 Section 91 . 405(a) requires. i n pertinent part_ that an aircraff operator or owner shal l have that aircraft i nspected as prescr ibed i n subpart E of the same part and shall, between req u i red i nspectiOns, except as provided i n parag raph (c) of the same sactiOn , have discre pancies repaired as prescribed i n pan 43 

## o t the ch apter.4 I

Tt!cr • r no

**~wi-'ruvecl** mamtel)aor:P iJit'!lf·Jm tm tl11 I'I!.Ultc>m lflflll'v'f'' 

### .w!l rm:;um tho111t .,, · t1110111111 compif'!O ow"!; haul by an JDpwvc. d OJI m Jtnt n.!nrf' '- •r!;nnfJP.,'

**~mrw.Jfly** section 9t .407(a)( t) prohibits , i n



### ~rtin **nt** part. any per$Ofl from operating an ai r craft that has undergone maintenance, preverrtive maintenance, rebuild i ng, or alteration

**unless~** has been approved for relum 10 

### service by a pe<SOO authorized under 

### § 43. 7 

## ot the same chapter . 

### •

Soction 91 . 409(a ) (2) p r escribes , i n pe rti nent part_ that no peraon may operate an a i rcraft 

### unless, within the preced i i')Q 12: calendar mon th s , it 

### has had an inspection f or the 

### issuance o1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MELDRICK TAYLOR,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 423 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of February, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00460

- CV

In re David O ’ Connor

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

R ela tor ’ s motion for emergency relief is also denied.

_______________________ ___________________

Chari L. Kelly , Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Kelly

Filed: August 5 , 2022
#### LOUISIANA TROOPERS ASSOCIATION et al. v. LOUISIANA CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION.

No. 8395.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

May 19, 1971.

Sidney M. Bach of Bernstein & Bach, New Orleans, for appellants.

R. Gray Sexton, Baton Rouge, for ap-pellee.

Before LOTTINGER, SARTAIN and TUCKER, JJ.

DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

PER CURIAM.

On Motion of Appellant, the above numbered and entitled case is dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

**Section 1350 Certifications**

 

**In connection with this annual report of Global Horizons IL.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”),I, Michael L. Pungello, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

 

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

 

2.The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:March 31, 2006

 
| By                                        | /s/ MICHAEL L. PUNGELLO |   |
|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Michael L. Pungello                       |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer   |
| and Treasurer                             |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Offi) |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8564

WALTER LEE SADLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

INMATES OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY JAIL ANNEX,

Plaintiffs,

versus

JIM PENDERGRASS, Sheriff; MECKLENBURG COUNTY

JAILS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District

Judge. (CA-95-443-3-MU)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 2, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Lee Sadler, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Sadler v. Pendergrass, No. CA-95-443-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Dec. 1,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

HARRISON J. BREAULT, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-211 Erie

v. )

)

SUPER, WAKEFIELD, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on July 28, 2005,

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 12], filed on

August 4, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be denied and that a certificate

of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of

service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on

Respondents. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and

documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following

order is entered:

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DENIED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 12] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on August 4, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00211-SJM-SPB Document 13 Filed 08/29/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     19,090
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,474
<PP&E>                                          13,902
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,794
<BONDS>                                         12,047
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,065
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,915
<SALES>                                         26,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,095
<CGS>                                            8,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,887
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,267
<INCOME-TAX>                                       648
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,619
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,619
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          40,375
<SECURITIES>                                     9,997
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,972
<PP&E>                                           4,543
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,307
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,800
<OTHER-SE>                                    (20,085)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   175,105
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               968,909
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  934,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,062)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (111)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,951)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,951)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.88)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of The Bralorne  Mining  Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  February 28, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
         Company.


Date:  May 1, 2006


/s/ Jeff Yenyou Zheng
---------------------------------------
Jeff Yenyou Zheng, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Hilton PAYNE and Edna Mae Payne, his wife, Appellants, v. Leome CULMER, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 69-422.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Dec. 16, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUser's manual for UCAP: Unified Counter-Rotation Aero-Acoustics ProgramThis is the user's manual for the Unified Counter-rotation Aeroacoustics Program (UCAP), the counter-rotation derivative of the UAAP (Unified Aero-Acoustic Program). The purpose of this program is to predict steady and unsteady air loading on the blades and the noise produced by a counter-rotation Prop-Fan. The aerodynamic method is based on linear potential theory with corrections for nonlinearity associated with axial flux induction, vortex lift on the blades, and rotor-to-rotor interference. The theory for acoustics and the theory for individual blade loading and wakes are derived in Unified Aeroacoustics Analysis for High Speed Turboprop Aerodynamics and Noise, Volume 1 (NASA CR-4329). This user's manual also includes a brief explanation of the theory used for the modelling of counter-rotation.Document ID19930017959Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCulver, E. M.*(United Technologies Corp. Windsor Locks, CT, United States)*Mccolgan, C. J.*(United Technologies Corp. Windsor Locks, CT, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1993Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:191034NASA-CR-191034Accession Number93N27148Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 535-03-10CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-24222Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930017959.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
258 La. 341

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Lawrence MAGEE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51281.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 7, 1971.

In re: Lawrence Magee applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus.

Writ granted. The trial court is ordered to grant an evidentiary hearing limited to the question of whether applicant’s plea of guilty was knowing and intelligent.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25825]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA, Inc.; Special Committee 169; Aeronautical Data Link 
Applications

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for 
Special Committee (SC)-169 meeting to be held October 14-16, 1997, 
starting at 9 a.m. The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1140 
Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036.
    The agenda will include: October 14-15, Working Group (WG)-2, 
Required Communications Performance; October 16-17, WG-4, Data 
Communication Coordination Plan. (WG-4 will meet after the Plenary 
Session on October 16 and, if necessary, on October 17.) October 16, 
Plenary Session: (1) Plenary Administration: Chairman's Introductory 
Remarks; Review and Approval of Meeting Agenda; Review and Approval of 
Minutes from the Previous Meeting; Review of Outstanding Action Items; 
(2) WG Progress: WG-1, Air Traffic Services Data Link Communications; 
WG-2, Required Communications Performance; WG-3, Flight Information 
Services Communications; WG-4, Coordination of Communications 
Capability Implementation; WG-5, Ground/Ground Traffic Flow Management 
Applications; WG-6, Human Factors Guidelines; (3) Plenary Business: 
Review of SARP Compliant Documents; Discussion of Future of SC-169 Work 
Efforts; (4) Other Business; (5) Date and Place of Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web 
site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 24, 1997.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 97-25825 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
NO. 07-07-0265-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

OCTOBER 19, 2007

______________________________

JUSTIN CURTIS OEHLERT,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 251st DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 15,547-C; HON. ANA ESTEVEZ, PRESIDING

_______________________________

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Appellant appeals from his conviction for aggravated robbery. On October 1, 2007,

the clerk’s record was filed. The reporter’s record was due on September 28, 2007. No

extension motion or record was filed. On October 5, 2007, this court directed the court

reporter by letter “to advise the Court of the status of the reporter’s record on or before

Monday, October 15, 2007." To date, no record or extension motion has been filed with

this Court.
2

Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 251st District Court

of Randall County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall

immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to

determine the following:

1. why the reporter’s record has not been filed,

2. when the reporter’s record can reasonably be filed in a manner that

does not further delay the prosecution of this appeal or have the

practical effect of depriving the appellant of his right to appeal, and,

3. whether an alternate or substitute reporter should or can be appointed

to complete the record in a timely manner. 

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute

findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be

developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of

law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cause to be

developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the

aforementioned hearing, if any. Additionally, the district court shall then file the

supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this

court on or before November 19, 2007. Should further time be needed by the trial court

to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before November 19, 2007.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.