alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### George Rivers, Plaintiff, *v.*J. William Duncan et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County,

August 15, 1952.

*Willard G. Burt*for J. William Duncan, defendant.

*John J. O’Connor*for Pinkas Fischer, doing business as Pinkas Fischer & Co., defendant.

*Jacob Fuchsberg*and *Samuel S. Parmet*for plaintiff.

Matthew M. Levy, J.

A defendant moves for a physical examination of plaintiff and for a discovery and inspection in aid of it. The motion is opposed by plaintiff on the sole ground that a codefendant has already been afforded the same relief, and that the first defendant’s physician’s report will be made available to the moving defendant. This objection is untenable.

A plaintiff is normally entitled to all appropriate intermediate relief of a procedural nature as against each defendant; and, vice versa, each defendant, if represented by a separate attorney, similarly is entitled to proper relief as against the plaintiff, even though it may be the same as that awarded another defendant. What one defendant knows or does or has is not necessarily of benefit to his codefendant. Bach usually stands on an individual footing in regard to the processes of litigation and trial. There is nothing in the opposing affidavit upon which to warrant a belief that this case in that regard is out of the ordinary.

The motion is granted. Settle order.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION of CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER and CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MERGE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED (the "Company") for the year ended December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Richard A. Linden, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Scott T. Veech, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their
knowledge:



|Date:    March 7, 2005 |  | By: | /s/RICHARD A. LINDENRichard A. Linden Chief Executive
Officer
|---------------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    March 7, 2005 |  | By: | /s/SCOTT T. VEECHScott T. Veech Chief Financial Officer      

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

See
also the certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which are included in this annual report on Form 10-K.

---



QuickLinks
Checklists for Authorization Washington

– 2010 Checklists for Authorization

Revision Checklist Number Federal Requirement FR Reference & Date

17 S HSWA Codification Rule

- Ex posure I nformation 50 FR 28702 7/15/85

117B Toxicity

Characteristi c Amendment 57 FR 23062 6/1/92

203 Hazardous Waste Management Sy stem;

Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste; Recy cled Used Oil Management Standards 68 FR 44659 7/30/03

205 National E mission Standards for Hazardous

Air Pollutants: Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light

- Duty

Trucks 69 FR 22601 4/26/04

207 Hazardous Waste Sy stem; Modification of the

Hazardous Wast Manifest 70 FR 10775 4/4/05

207.1 Hazardous Wa ste Sy stem; Modification of

Hazardous Waste Manifest Sy stem; Correction 70 FR 35034 6/16/05

209 Hazardous Waste Management Sy stem;

Modification of the Hazardous Waste Program; Mercury

- c ontaining Equipment 70 FR 45507 8/5/05

212 National Emission Standards for Hazardous

Air Pollutants ; Final Standards for Hazardous Waste Combustors (Phase I Final Replacement Standards and Phase II) 70 FR 59402 9/12/05

213 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Burden Reduction Initiative 70 FR 16861 4/4/06

214 Hazardous Waste and Used Oil ;

Corrections to Errors in the Code of Federal Regulations 70 FR 40253 7/14/06

215 Cathode Ray Tubes Rule 71 FR 4298 7/28/06

217 Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

F or Hazardous Waste Combustors ; Amendments 73 FR 18970 4/8/08
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26910]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Surrender of License

October 6, 1997.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been 
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Surrender of License.
    b. Project No.: 7664-023.
    c. Date Filed: August 29, 1997.
    d. Applicant: Island Power Company, Inc.
    e. Name of Project: Clark Canyon Dam.
    f. Location: On Beaverhead River, in Beaverhead County, Montana.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 USC Section 791(a)--
825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Jay R. Bingham, President, Island Power 
Company, Inc., 5160 Wiley Post Way, Suite 200, Salt Lake City, UT 
84116, (801) 532-2520.
    i. FERC Contact: Regina Saizan, (202) 219-2673.
    j. Comment Date: November 20, 1997.
    k. Description of Application: The licensee seeks to surrender its 
license because it is not financially feasible to construct the 
project.
    l. This notice also consists of the following standard paragraphs: 
B, C1, and D2.
    B. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene--Anyone may submit 
comments, a protests, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211, 
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission 
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who 
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules 
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or 
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified 
comment date for the particular application.
    C1. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents--Any filings must 
bear in all capital letters the letter ``COMMENTS'', ``RECOMMENDATIONS 
FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS'', ``PROTEST'', OR ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as 
applicable, and the Project Number of the particular application to 
which the filing refers. Any of the above-named documents must be filed 
by providing the original and the number of copies provided by the 
Commission's regulations to: The Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426. A copy of 
any motion to intervene must also be served upon each representative of 
the Applicant specified in the particular application.
    D2. Agency Comments--Federal, state, and local agencies are invited 
to filed comments on the described application. A copy of the 
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If 
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing 
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an 
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26910 Filed 10-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3026 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3026

To amend the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 to repeal restrictions on 
                         offshore wind leasing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 4, 2023

 Mr. Welch (for himself, Mr. Merkley, and Mr. Sanders) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 to repeal restrictions on 
                         offshore wind leasing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nonrestrictive Offshore Wind Act'' 
or the ``NOW Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF OFFSHORE WIND LEASING RESTRICTIONS.

    (a) Limitation on Issuance of Certain Leases or Rights-of-Way.--
Section 50265(b) of Public Law 117-169 (commonly known as the 
``Inflation Reduction Act of 2022'') (43 U.S.C. 3006(b)) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraph (2);
            (2) in paragraph (1), by striking ``this Act'' in the 
        matter preceding paragraph (1) and all that follows through 
        ``(1) the Secretary may'' in paragraph (1) and inserting ``this 
        Act, the Secretary may'';
            (3) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as 
        paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively, and indenting 
        appropriately; and
            (4) in paragraph (2) (as so redesignated), by redesignating 
        clauses (i) and (ii) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), 
        respectively, and indenting appropriately.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 50265 of Public Law 117-169 
(commonly known as the ``Inflation Reduction Act of 2022'') (43 U.S.C. 
3006) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (2); and
                    (B) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph 
                (2); and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``paragraphs (1) and (2) 
        of''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Glenn Terrill TREECE, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 71-213.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 1, 1971.

Habeas corpus denied.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Encyclopedia of ethical failure.
 
2003 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008
2011 | 2012 | 2013| 2014 | 2015 | 2016| 2018 | 2019
2020
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.133:
Item Number:0306-A-73 (online)
CGP System Number:000904658
 
 
July 25, 2017**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DONALD PAUL WILKINS, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-144 Erie

v. )

)

JAMES SHERMAN, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on May 13, 2005,

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 7], filed on July

31, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be denied. The parties were allowed

ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on

Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondent. No objections were filed. After de novo

review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and

Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 7] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on July 31, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00144-SJM-SPB Document 8 Filed 08/18/06 Page 1 of 1
Order entered September 22, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00803-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.G., I.V.G. AND E.G., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-17718

ORDER

By order entered September 8, 2014, we directed appellant to file, no later than 

September 15, 2014, written verification he had requested preparation of the reporter’s record 

and had paid or made arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee. Appellant did not respond. 

However, on September 19, 2014, the court reporter informed us that she had received payment, 

and she requested a brief extension of time. We GRANT the court reporter’s request and 

ORDER the reporter’s record be filed no later than September 29, 2014. 

As the clerk’s record has been filed, appellant’s brief shall be filed within thirty days of 

the filing of the reporter’s record. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00178

- CR

Omar Javier Magana
v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. S

- 20

- 3262CR

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having conside red this cause on
appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
January 13, 2022
#### Bertha ABESS, et al., Appellants, v. DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by its Board of County Commissioners acting as the Dade County Port Authority, et al., Appellees.

No. 69-499.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 16, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-62787 and
333-56645) and Form S-4 (No. 333-03107) and in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-57077, 33-57081, 33-57083, 33-64553, 333-10389, 333-17891,
333-36339, 333-50541, and 333-67035) of AirTouch Communications, Inc. of our
report dated March 1, 1999 appearing on page 35 of the Annual Report to
Stockholders which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
February 23, 1998 relating to the consolidated financial statements of CMT
Partners, which appears on page S-3 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1997. We also consent to the incorporation by reference
of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule of AirTouch Communications,
Inc. which appears on page X-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and our report
on the Financial Statement Schedule of CMT Partners which appears on page S-12
of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Francisco, California
March 29, 1999
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



                  KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Gary M. Gray constitutes
and appoints Jeffrey A. Montgomery and Gregory M. Yulish, and each of them, his
true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place, and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments)
to this Form 10-KSB, and to file same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the foregoing, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitute, may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     /s/  GARY M. GRAY
 --------------------------------              Director          March 28, 1997
EXHIBIT
23.1

















CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and amendments thereto:





Form S-8
No. 333-115851


Form S-3
No. 333-113710


Form S-8
No. 333-130916


Form S-3
No. 333-135547


Form S-3
No. 333-135549


Form S-8
No. 333-135525





of Sun
Healthcare Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 5, 2008, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sun Healthcare Group, Inc. and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sun Healthcare
Group, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2007.








/s/ Ernst
& Young LLP








Dallas,
Texas


March 5,
2008
EXHIBIT 99.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the T REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony W. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  
1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 
 
 
 
2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  November 14, 2002

By:

/s/**  **ANTHONY W. THOMPSON

 
 
  
  
**Anthony W. Thompson Chief Executive Officer**

  
  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WILLIAM JOSEPH CUNNINGHAM, 1 

Petitioner, 

Civil Action No. 04-1 19 Erie 

v. 

WILLIAM STICKMAN, et al., I 

Respondents. I 

MEMORANDUM ORDER 

-This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on June 17, 

2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for 

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(I), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 151, filed on 

March 9, 2006, recommended that Petitioner's Petition be dismissed and that a 

certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the 

date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and 

on Respondents. Petitioner was subsequently granted two extensions of time to file 

objections [Doc. No. 16; Doc. No. 171. Petitioner filed objections on April 21, 2006 

[Doc. No. 181. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together 

with the Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is 

entered: 

AND NOW, this 24'h day of April, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus is DISMISSED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 151 of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed 

on March 9, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. 

sl Sean J. McLaughlin United States District Judge 

cm: All parties of record 

Case 1:04-cv-00119-SJM-SPB Document 20 Filed 04/24/06 Page 1 of 2
Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:04-cv-00119-SJM-SPB Document 20 Filed 04/24/06 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 303 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to limit the use of Federal funds 

for travel by the President if the President’s annual budget submission 

to Congress is late, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2023 

Mr. MARSHALL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to limit the use 

of Federal funds for travel by the President if the President’s annual budget submission to Congress is late, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Presidential Budget 

5 Accountability Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKBC47HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 303 IS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR 

2 PRESIDENTIAL TRAVEL EXPENSES IF PRESI3 DENT’S BUDGET IS LATE. 

4 Section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(j)(1) If the budget under subsection (a) is not sub7 mitted to Congress on or before the first Monday in Feb8 ruary of a year, no Federal funds may be obligated or 

9 expended for the cost of travel by the President during 

10 the period beginning on the first Tuesday of February of 

11 such year and ending on the date the budget is submitted. 

12 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘Fed13 eral funds’ includes amounts made available for— 

14 ‘‘(A) the expense allowance of the President 

15 under section 102 of title 3; 

16 ‘‘(B) travel expenses of the President under sec17 tion 103 of title 3; 

18 ‘‘(C) entertainment expenses of the President 

19 under section 105(d)(3) of title 3; and 

20 ‘‘(D) subsistence expenses in connection with 

21 the travel of the President in section 105(d)(4) of 

22 title 3.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKBC47HB2PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Kelly Wayne Lamon, Appellant

No. 06-14-00241-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 102nd District Court of Red 

River County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR02184). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Kelly Wayne Lamon, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 19, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk