alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26293]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 97-144]


NASA Advisory Council, Aeronautics and Space Transportation 
Technology Advisory Committee, Air Traffic Management Research and 
Development Executive Steering Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a NASA Advisory Council, Aeronautics and Space 
Transportation Technology Advisory Committee, Air Traffic Management 
Research and Development Executive Steering Committee meeting.

DATES: October 21, 22, and 23, 1997, 8:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research 
Center, Building 262, Room 100, Moffett Field, CA 94035.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Herbert W. Schlickenmaier, 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Headquarters, 
Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-4638.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The meeting will focus on NASA's 
Advanced Air Transportation Technology (AATT) element of the aviation 
capacity research program. Agenda topics for the meeting are as 
follows:

--AATT Program Introduction
--Overview of AATT Level II Plan
--Summary at AATT Sub-element Level III Plans
--Review of the AATT Level 1, Milestone 1, Program Plan Assessment

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitors register.

    Dated: September 26, 1997.
Leslie M. Nolan
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26293 Filed 10-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
Exhibit 10.3
 ADD ON CONTENT ADDENDUM
TO CONFIDENTIAL LICENSE AGREEMENT
FOR THE WII CONSOLE
  1. BACKGROUND
     2. DEFINITIONS




---



##### 



3. GRANT OF LICENSE; RESTRICTIONS
 Grant of Development License to LICENSEE
 Grant of License to NOA
 Restrictions and Prohibitions
 4. DEVELOPMENT; APPROVALS; UPGRADES; DISTRIBUTION; SUPPORT
 Responsibility for Add On Content
 PAGE 2 OF 7




---



##### 



Security Technology, System Updates and Notifications
 Submission of Completed Add On Content
 No Obligation to Market, Distribute or Sell
 Technical Support
 Customer Support
 5. PRICE; ROYALTIES
 Price
 Royalty
 PAGE 3 OF 7




---



##### 



Performance Thresholds
   Payments
 Withholding Taxes th
 Royalty Offsets
 Refunds
 PAGE 4 OF 7




---



##### 



Other
 Claims
 Royalty Reports
 6. MARKETING, ADVERTISING, AND CUSTOMER SUPPORT
 Marketing
 By NOA
 By LICENSEE
 Royalty-Free Copies
 7. ADDITIONAL REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND DISCLAIMERS
 LICENSEEs Representations and Warranties
 PAGE 5 OF 7




---



##### 



NOAs Disclaimers
 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS DISCLAIMER
  8. INDEMNIFICATION
  9. TERM AND TERMINATION
 Term of Addendum
 Termination of Add On Content
 PAGE 6 OF 7




---



##### 



Survival
 10. GENERAL PROVISIONS
 References to Licensed Products
 Confidential License Agreement for the Wii Console
 Application of Other Agreements
 NOA:
    
    LICENSEE:NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC.
    
    MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANYBy:
    
    
    
    
    
    By:Name:
    
    James R. Cannataro
    
    
    
    Name:Title:
    
    Executive VP, Administration
    
    
    
    Title:Date:
    
    
    
    
    
    Date:
 PAGE 7 OF 7
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 5149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2643]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. 96-ACE-15]


Amendment to Class E Airspace, Lee's Summit, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule amends the Class E airspace area at Lee's Summit 
Municipal Airport, Lee's Summit, MO. A review of Class E airspace 
revealed a need to increase the airspace area to contain Instrument 
Flight Rules (IFR) operations at Lee's Summit Municipal Airport. The 
effect of this rule is to provide additional controlled airspace for 
aircraft executing the Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAP).

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC March 27, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, Operations Branch, ACE-530C, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, 
Missouri 64106: telephone number: (801) 426-3408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on October 30, 
1996, (61 FR 55882). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure 
for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be 
no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public 
that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written 
adverse comment or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on March 27, 1997. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this notice confirms that this final rule will become 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on January 3, 1997.
Christopher R. Blum,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 97-2643 Filed 2-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                    Ending
Class            Interest             Principal    Losses           Balance
<S>               <C>                  <C>            <C>           <C>
A1                679676.97       9958575.52                0        17482614.38
A2                   340740                0                0           10800000
A3                512800.02                0                0           16000000
A4                330499.98                0                0           10000000
A5                197037.54                0                0            5527000
A6                263872.92                0                0                  0
B1                 511137.3                0                0           11346000
B2                305032.06                0                0            5541000
M1                395284.74                0                0           10555000
M2                301995.42                0                0            7916000
X                         0                0                0                  0


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gerald DICKERSON.

No. 61714.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 1978.

In re: Gerald Dickerson applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs and for a stay order.

Writ denied. Adequate remedy by review in event of conviction.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, ChristopherL. Nelson, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K of VCampus Corporation;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, thisannual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this annualreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;

 

4.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

a.     designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;

 

b.     evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c.     disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s independent registered public accounting firm and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a.     all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

 

b.     any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: March  21, 2006 | By:    |   | /S/  CHRISTOPHER L. NELSON |   |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|                  |   |   | Christopher  L. Nelson     |
|                  |   |   | Chief  Financial Officer   |
|                       |        |        |                            |        |  |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 12 DAVE & BUSTERS, INC.
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
TO FIXED CHARGES
(dollars in thousands, except ratios) Year to DateEndedFebruary 1, 2004Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect
of a change in an accounting principle
    
    $
    16,650Fixed charges:Interest expense **
    
    
    7,443Capitalized interest
    
    
    171Estimate of interest included in rental expense ***
    
    
    8,332Total fixed charges
    
    $
    15,946Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of a change
in an accounting principle, less capitalized interest
    
    $
    32,425Ratio of earnings to fixed charges:
    
    
    2.03
  **
    
    Interest expense includes interest in association with debt and amortization
of debt issuance costs.***
    
    Fixed charges include our estimate of interest included in rental payments
made under operating leases.
EXHIBIT 24
                                                 POWER OF ATTORNEY

        The undersigned officer and/or director of EMERGING DELTA CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"),  hereby constitutes and appoints Jerry
W.  Jarrell  and  D.B.H.  Chaffe  III,  and each of  them,  with  full  power of
substitution and resubstitution,  as attorney to sign for the undersigned in any
and all capacities the  Corporation's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended March 31, 1998 and any and all amendments thereto, with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission and with full power and authority to do and perform any and
all  acts  and  things  whatsoever  required  and  necessary  to be  done in the
premises,  as fully to all intents and purposes as the  undersigned  could do if
personally  present.  The undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said
attorney-in-fact  and  agent,  or any  of his  substitute  or  substitutes,  may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof and incorporate such changes as
any of the said attorneys-in-fact deems appropriate.


------------------------------
Burt H. Keenan

May 23, 1998
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brian J. Berchtold, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 (this Amendment) to annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, of ALCiS Health, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Amendment does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Amendment; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Amendment, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Amendment.

Date: June 29, 2007



|    |  |                                                
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /S/ Brian J. Berchtold                         
|    |  | Brian J. Berchtold,                            
|    |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 51757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26365]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 191 / Thursday, October 2, 1997 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 51757]]


                Executive Order 13063 of September 30, 1997

                
Level V of the Executive Schedule: Removal of the 
                Executive Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty 
                Corporation, Department of Labor

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 5317 of title 5, United 
                States Code, and in order to remove a position from 
                Level V of the Executive Schedule, it is hereby ordered 
                that section 1-102 of Executive Order 12154, as 
                amended, is further amended by removing the following 
                subsection from section 1-102: ``(b) Executive 
                Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 
                Department of Labor''; and relettering subsections (c) 
                through (f) as subsections (b) through (e), 
                respectively.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    September 30, 1997.

[FR Doc. 97-26365
Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
```

[104th Congress Public Law 137]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ137.104]

Public Law 104-137
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the United States Post Office-Courthouse located at South 
  6th and Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas, as the ``Judge Isaac C. 
   Parker Federal Building''. <<NOTE: Apr. 30, 1996 -  [H.R. 1804]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office-Courthouse located at South 6th and 
Rogers Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office-Courthouse 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal Building''.

    Approved April 30, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1804:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-367 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 141 (1995):
                                    Dec. 5, considered and passed House.
                                                        Vol. 142 (1996):
                                    Apr. 16, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 23.4

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-62787) and
in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-57083, 33-57077, 33-57081
and 33-64553) of AirTouch Communications, Inc. of our report dated February 23,
1996 relating to the financial statements of Mannesman Mobilfunk GmbH, which
appears in AirTouch Communications Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1995.


Dusseldorf, Germany, March 26, 1996


KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft
Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft


Scheffler                               Haas
Wirtschaftsprufer                       Wirtschaftsprufer
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT UNIT E D ST A T E S O F AM E RICA, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. RO B E RT AL L E N KE NT , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 12-50186

D.C . No. 2:11-c r-00463-PSG-1 M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Philip S. Gutierre z , Distric t Judge , Pre siding A rgue d and Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 8, 2014 Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : K O Z INSKI , C hie f Judge , RE INH A RDT and CL IFT O N , C i rc uit

Judge s. 1. Whe n a

distric t c ourt re je c ts a de fe nda nt’ s non-frivolous sente nc ing argum e nt, it m

u s t provide a

re a sone d e xpla

n at ion for its de c ision. Se e Unite d Stat e s v. Trujillo, 713 F.3d 1003, 1010–11 (9th C i r. 2013). The distric t

c ourt a buse d its disc re tion by

fa iling to do so in re sponse to Ke nt’ s a sse rtion tha t the 

# FIL ED FEB 06 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.pa ge 2

distribution e

nha nc e m e nt shouldn’ t a

pply . Se e Unite d State s v. Kim bre w, 406 F.3d 1149, 1151 (9th C ir. 2005). B e c a use we re ve rse for re se nte n c ing on this ground, we ne e d not a ddre ss Ke nt’ s c la im tha t his se nte nc e wa s substa

ntive l y unre a s ona

ble . 2. The distric t c ourt didn’ t a buse its disc re tion by

re quiring Ke nt to pa rtic i pate in the C o m

pute r M onitoring Progra

m a s a c ondition of re le a s e . It’ s e ntire l y a ppropria te to le ave “ the de ta ils of wha t [m onitoring] te c hnologie s should be use d ” to the Probat ion Offic e . Unite d State s v. Quinz o n , 643 F.3d 1266, 1274 (9th C ir. 2011). If te c hnology ha s c ha nge d by the tim e Ke nt is re le a se d from prison, a nd he be lie ve s tha

t Probation ha s not m e t its “ c ontinuing obliga tion to e nsure not only

the e ffic a c y of the c om

p ute r surve illa

nc e m e thods use d, but a lso that the y re m a i n re a sona

bly ta i lore d so a s not to beunne c e ssa rily intrusive , ” id., he m ay se e k re lie f from

the distric t c ourt a

t tha t tim e . RE V E RSE D AND RE M ANDE D
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Western Michigan University; Notice of Decision on Application 
for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 97-053. Applicant: Western Michigan University, 
Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5167. Instrument: Electron Energy Analyzer. 
Manufacturer: Scienta Instrument AB, Sweden. Intended Use: See notice 
at 62 FR 40334, July 28, 1997.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides highest energy 
resolution of 5.0 meV with resolving power to 1500. The National 
Institute of Standards and Technology and Brookhaven National 
Laboratory advised on May 27, 1997 that (1) these capabilities are 
pertinent to the applicant's intended purpose and (2) they know of no 
domestic instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the 
foreign instrument for the applicant's intended use (comparable case).
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured 
in the United States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-25785 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### James Murray HICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. M-471, N-45.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 23, 1970.

Virlyn B. Willis, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., J. Christian Meffert, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The record on appeal, briefs and arguments of counsel having been considered, it is our view that the issues in this case are controlled by this court’s decisions in Wilkes v. State, 182 So.2d 480 (Fla.App.1966); and Miller v. State, 233 So.2d 448 (Fla.App.1970). Accordingly, the judgment appealed herein is

Affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K, Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
#### NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Joseph B. LAIRD.

No. 10657.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Nov. 11, 1936.

Lakenan M. Price, of Columbia, Mo., for appellant.

Roy Hamlin, of Hannibal, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed at costs of appellant, pursuant to stipulation of parties.