alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                             EMERGING DELTA CORPORATION
                                             --------------------------

                                              STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                              ------------------------

                                     FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002 AND 2001
                                    --------------------------------------------


                                                                                    2002           2001
                                                                                   -------        ------
<S>                                                                                <C>            <C>

INTEREST INCOME                                                                    $ 9,039        $18,788

COSTS AND EXPENSES                                                                 (15,566)       (14,976)
                                                                                   -------        -------

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAX PROVISION                                                  (6,527)         3,812

TAX PROVISION                                                                          -             (368)
                                                                                   -------        -------

NET INCOME (LOSS)                                                                  $ 6,527)       $ 3,444
                                                                                   =======        =======

BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE                                        $  (.15)       $   .08
                                                                                   =======        =======

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF BASIC AND DILUTED
    SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                              43,600         43,600
                                                                                   =======        =======


                    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
</TABLE>

                                                     F-4
#### Barbara B. GANTT, Appellant, v. VOLUSIA COUNTY HEALTH FACILITIES AUTHORITY etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 53776.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 26, 1978.

Barbara B. Gantt in pro. per.

Melvin Orfinger, Daytona Beach, for ap-pellee.

Stephen L. Boyles, Palatka, for Seventh Judicial Circuit.

*388ORDER OF DISMISSAL

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before the Court on a motion to dismiss the appeal initiated herein by notice of appeal filed April 3,1978. Due to the necessity to expedite review of the validity of bond proceedings, by order filed April 26, 1978, the Court denied appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a brief and an appendix prescribed by Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(i). On May 4, 1978, appellees filed their motion to dismiss asserting (i) the appeal was not timely filed, (ii) the appeal is frivolous, and (iii) the failure to file a brief or an appendix within the time prescribed by Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(i).

Upon consideration of the motion to dismiss:

(1) We find said appeal to have been timely filed due to the inclusion of a weekend and a legal holiday in the computation of time.

(2) There is no basis for a decision that the appeal is frivolous or taken merely for delay.

(3) Due to the failure of appellant to file a brief or an appendix within the time prescribed by Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(i), there is nothing before this Court which provides us with a basis to review the merits of the appeal.

Consequently, the motion to dismiss for failure to file a brief or an appendix within the time prescribed by Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(i) is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and SUNDBERG and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

ENGLAND, J., concurs with an opinion.

BOYD and HATCHETT, JJ., dissent.

ENGLAND, Justice,

concurring.

Inasmuch as the time for appellant to file a brief and appendix with the Court had expired before appellant requested an extension of time, nothing in the appellate rules tolled appellant’s filing time,1 and since appellant has still not filed either document as of this date, I agree that the Court should exercise its discretion2 to dismiss this appeal.

OVERTON, C. J., and ALDERMAN, J., concur.

1

. Fla.R.App.P. 9.300(b) and (d)(9).

2

. Fla.R.App.P. 9.410.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: August 6, 2010 FROM: Keith Barnett, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD /MMG TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 2007 - 0877, Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants SUBJECT: In corporation by reference of Docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2002 - 0051 , National Emissio ns Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Portland Cement Manufacturing. Docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2002 - 0051 contains information that is relevant to the Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants rulemaking and Docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2002 - 0051 is incor

porated b y reference into this docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2007 - 0877.
No. 00-935.

#### Conte *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Panel for Biomolecular Structure and Function; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Panel for Biomolecular Structure and Function--
(1134) (Panel B).
    Date and Time: Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, October 20, 21, 
and 22, 1997 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 360, 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Drs. Kamal Shukla & Dagmar Ringe, Program 
Directors for Molecular Biophysics, Room 655, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230. (703/
306-1444).
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate research proposals submitted to 
the Molecular Biophysics Program as part of the selection process 
for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 29, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26134 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  EXHIBIT A.3



                     CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG ACCOUNTANTS,
                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (i) Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-92502) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Plan, the 1995
Director Option Plan, the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan for U.S. Employees
and the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan for Non-U.S. Employees, (ii)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-34479) pertaining to Amended 1995 Stock
Plan and 1996 Director Option Plan of Aurum Software, Inc., (iii) Registrations
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-34973) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Plan of Baan
Company N.V., and (iv) Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-24201) and
related Prospectus pertaining to Convertible Subordinated Notes of Baan Company
N.V., of our report dated May 4, 1998, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Baan Company N.V. included in the Annual Report (Form
20-F) for the year ended December 31, 1998.




                                          Ernst & Young Accountants


Utrecht, The Netherlands
June 2, 1999
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52536-52537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26588]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT97-72-000]

Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

October 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 30, 1997, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing as part of its 
FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the revised tariff sheets 
listed on the filing, to become effective September 11, 1997.
    Williston Basin states that on September 11, 1997, the Commission 
issued its ``Order Granting Restatement of Maximum Capacity,'' in 
Docket No. CP97-639-000 which granted permission for an approval of the 
restatement of the maximum daily delivery and receipt point capacities 
as more fully described in Williston Basin's application filed on July 
15, 1997 and as supplemented on August 7, 1997. Williston Basin 
therefore states it is including all of the proposed revisions to its 
Master Receipt/Delivery Point List as approved by the Commission's 
September 11, 1997 Order in the above noted tariff sheets.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are

[[Page 52537]]

available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26588 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### Richard VAN EATON v. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 39072.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.
#### Dagmar WREDE, Appellant, v. CARILLON HOTEL, Appellee.

No. 69-351.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 28, 1969.

McDonald & McDonald and S. Peter Capua, Miami, for appellant.

Rosenberg, Rosenberg, Reisman & Glass, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Scott v. National Airlines, Inc., Fla.1963, 150 So.2d 237; and Mountain v. National Airlines, Inc., Fla. 1954, 75 So.2d 574.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of NeoGenomics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      May 13, 2009
              /s/Robert P.
      GaspariniRobert
      P. GaspariniPresident
      and Chief Science OfficerDate:
      May 13, 2009
              /s/Steven C.
      JonesSteven
      C. JonesActing
      Principal Financial OfficerDate:
      May 13, 2009
              /s/Jerome J.
      DvonchJerome
      J. DvonchDirector
      of Finance and Principal  Accounting
  Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.  A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Estelle LaVERNE, Petitioner, v. ROLLINS COLLEGE, Respondent.

No. 70-1075.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 26, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEngineering correlations of variable-property effects on laminar forced convection mass transfer for dilute vapor species and small particles in airA simple engineering correlation scheme is developed to predict the variable property effects on dilute species laminar forced convection mass transfer applicable to all vapor molecules or Brownian diffusing small particle, covering the surface to mainstream temperature ratio of 0.25  T sub W/T sub e  4. The accuracy of the correlation is checked against rigorous numerical forced convection laminar boundary layer calculations of flat plate and stagnation point flows of air containing trace species of Na, NaCl, NaOH, Na2SO4, K, KCl, KOH, or K2SO4 vapor species or their clusters. For the cases reported here the correlation had an average absolute error of only 1 percent (maximum 13 percent) as compared to an average absolute error of 18 percent (maximum 54 percent) one would have made by using the constant-property results.Document ID19840010510Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsGokoglu, S. A.*(Analex Corp. Cleveland, OH, United States)*Rosner, D. E.*(Yale Univ New Haven, Conn., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1984Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-168322NAS 1.26:168322Accession Number84N18578Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-201CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-23293Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840010510.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 31.1  I, Dempsey Mork, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Holdings, Inc.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  June 23, 2008  /s/ Dempsey Mork Dempsey Mork Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-K for the Year  Ended  December  31,  2004 (the  "Report")  by
Tarrant Apparel Group ("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.


Date:   April 15, 2005                       By: /s/ Corazon Reyes
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Corazon Reyes,
                                             Chief Financial Officer
### Water resources of the Mobile area, Alabama, with a section on salinity of the Mobile River

By: W.H. RobinsonWilliam J. PowellEugene BrownU.S. Army Corps of Engineers

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir373

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

March 31, 2004

Before

Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

No. 01-2928

Johnnie Walton,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

Kenneth R. Briley, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appealfrom the United States District

Court for the Northern District

of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 97 C 2539

John F. Grady, Judge.

O R D E R

The opinion issued in this case on March 17, 2004 is hereby corrected. In each of

the three following locations, the name “Renya” should be corrected to “Reyna”:

- page 2, first paragraph, line 3

- page 4, line 5

- page 4, first full paragraph, line 1.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Leonard FANT.

No. 60091.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

L. Howard McCurdy, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Timothy W. Cerniglia, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### David M. PORTER, Appellant, v. The CITY OF MELBOURNE, a municipality, et al., Appellees.

No. 70-799.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 23, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; William G. Akridge, Judge.

Appeal quashed.