alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.3


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Matrix  Bancorp,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
W. Kloos,  Senior Vice  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   March 12, 2004                       /s/ David W. Kloos
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name: David W. Kloos
                                              Title: Senior Vice President and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### REVISED AUGUST 23, 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-50987 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. BERNARDINO SAUCEDO-RIOS, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:09-CR-136-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Bernardino Saucedo-Rios appeals his guilty plea conviction of illegal reentry following deportation in violation of8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that the magistratejudge violated Rule 11(b)(1)(D) ofthe Federal Rules ofCriminal Procedure when he failed to inform Saucedo-Rios that Saucedo-Rios had “the United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D August 22, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce ClerkNo. 09-50987

2 right to be represented by counsel--and if necessary have the court appoint counsel--at trial and at every other stage of the proceeding.” Because Saucedo-Rios did not object in district court to the magistrate judge’s failure tocomply with Rule 11, we reviewfor plain error, which requires
a showing of clear or obvious error that affects substantial rights. See United Statesv. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 58-59 (2002). In evaluating whether an alleged Rule 1 1 error affects a defendant’s substantial rights, this court looks to whether there exists a “reasonable probability that, but for the error, he would not have entered the plea.” U nited States v. Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. 74, 83 (2004). Saucedo-Rios’s argument is unavailing. The rearraignment transcript reflects that the magistrate judge told Saucedo-Rios that by pleading guilty he
was giving up “the right to have the attorney present at trial and with you in any subsequent hearings or proceedings” and that Saucedo-Rios confirmed that he understood his rights. Thus, although the magistrate’s phrasing may have constituted a minor deviation from the text of Rule11(b)(1)(D), it did not constitute a violation of Rule 11. Furthermore, although the magistrate judge failed to inform Saucedo that he had the right to c ourt-appointed counsel, Saucedo was, in fact, represented by court-appointed counsel throughout the proceedings in the district court. See United States v. Sanchez, 650 F.2d 745, 748 (5th Cir. 1981) (holding that Rule 11 “limits the necessity for such a charge to situations where the defendant is not represented by an attorney at the plea proceeding”). Finally, there is simply no indication in the record that there existsa “reasonable probability that, but for theerror, [Saucedo] would not have entered the plea.” Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. at 83. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Joe Timothy SAVAGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-3.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 4, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 213 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on Resources 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain 

Federal land to Rio Arriba County, New Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rio Arriba County 

5 Land Conveyance Act’’. 
2 

S 213 RFH 

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

2 In this Act: 

3 (1) COUNTY.—The term ‘‘County’’ means the 

4 County of Rio Arriba, New Mexico. 

5 (2) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map en6 titled ‘‘Alcalde Proposed Land Transfer’’ and dated 

7 September 23, 2004. 

8 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

9 the Secretary of the Interior. 

10 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF LAND TO RIO ARRIBA COUNTY, 

11 NEW MEXICO. 

12 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, 

13 the Secretary shall convey to the County, without consid14 eration, all right, title, and interest of the United States 

15 in and to the land (including any improvements to the 

16 land) described in subsection (b). 

17 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in 

18 subsection (a) consists of approximately 171 acres of land 

19 located on the Sebastian Martin Land Grant in the vicin20 ity of Alcalde, Rio Arriba County, New Mexico, as depicted 

21 on the map. 

22 (c) REVERSION.—If any portion of the land conveyed 

23 under subsection (a) ceases to be used for public purposes 

24 the land shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to 

25 the United States. 
3 

S 213 RFH 

1 (d) CONDITIONS ON SALES.—If the County sells any 

2 portion of the land conveyed to the County under sub3 section (a)— 

4 (1) the amount of consideration for the sale 

5 shall reflect fair market value, as determined by an 

6 appraisal; and 

7 (2) the County shall pay to the Secretary an 

8 amount equal to the gross proceeds of the sale, for 

9 use by the Director of the Bureau of Land Manage10 ment in the State of New Mexico, without further 

11 appropriation. 

12 (e) COSTS.—The County shall pay any costs associ13 ated with the conveyance of land under subsection (a). 

Passed the Senate November 16, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
# Jornal Oficial C 109/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 109 |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 64.° ano29 de março de 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 109

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

64.° ano29 de março de 2021

---

| Índice | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informações |
| | INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA |
| | Comissão Europeia |
| 2021/C 109/01 | Taxas de câmbio do euro — 26 de março de 2021 | 1 |

Índice

Página

IV   Informações

INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA

Comissão Europeia

2021/C 109/01

Taxas de câmbio do euro — 26 de março de 2021

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

IV Informações

INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA

Comissão Europeia

| 29.3.2021 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | C 109/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2021

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

C 109/1

---

Taxas de câmbio do euro (1)

26 de março de 2021

(2021/C 109/01)

1 euro =

| | Moeda | Taxas de câmbio |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | dólar dos Estados Unidos | 1,1782 |
| JPY | iene | 129,34 |
| DKK | coroa dinamarquesa | 7,4361 |
| GBP | libra esterlina | 0,85503 |
| SEK | coroa sueca | 10,1905 |
| CHF | franco suíço | 1,1090 |
| ISK | coroa islandesa | 149,80 |
| NOK | coroa norueguesa | 10,1258 |
| BGN | lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | coroa checa | 26,081 |
| HUF | forint | 363,58 |
| PLN | zlóti | 4,6493 |
| RON | leu romeno | 4,8878 |
| TRY | lira turca | 9,4523 |
| AUD | dólar australiano | 1,5459 |
| CAD | dólar canadiano | 1,4814 |
| HKD | dólar de Hong Kong | 9,1540 |
| NZD | dólar neozelandês | 1,6863 |
| SGD | dólar singapurense | 1,5865 |
| KRW | won sul-coreano | 1 332,17 |
| ZAR | rand | 17,6845 |
| CNY | iuane | 7,7063 |
| HRK | kuna | 7,5740 |
| IDR | rupia indonésia | 16 986,70 |
| MYR | ringgit | 4,8854 |
| PHP | peso filipino | 57,132 |
| RUB | rublo | 89,5075 |
| THB | baht | 36,654 |
| BRL | real | 6,7110 |
| MXN | peso mexicano | 24,2575 |
| INR | rupia indiana | 85,4845 |

Moeda

Taxas de câmbio

USD

dólar dos Estados Unidos

1,1782

JPY

iene

129,34

DKK

coroa dinamarquesa

7,4361

GBP

libra esterlina

0,85503

SEK

coroa sueca

10,1905

CHF

franco suíço

1,1090

ISK

coroa islandesa

149,80

NOK

coroa norueguesa

10,1258

BGN

lev

1,9558

CZK

coroa checa

26,081

HUF

forint

363,58

PLN

zlóti

4,6493

RON

leu romeno

4,8878

TRY

lira turca

9,4523

AUD

dólar australiano

1,5459

CAD

dólar canadiano

1,4814

HKD

dólar de Hong Kong

9,1540

NZD

dólar neozelandês

1,6863

SGD

dólar singapurense

1,5865

KRW

won sul-coreano

1 332,17

ZAR

rand

17,6845

CNY

iuane

7,7063

HRK

kuna

7,5740

IDR

rupia indonésia

16 986,70

MYR

ringgit

4,8854

PHP

peso filipino

57,132

RUB

rublo

89,5075

THB

baht

36,654

BRL

real

6,7110

MXN

peso mexicano

24,2575

INR

rupia indiana

85,4845

---

(1)  Fonte: Taxas de câmbio de referência publicadas pelo Banco Central Europeu.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13

 
                         EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ADDENDUM

THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ADDENDUM, is a supplement to the original EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT dated January 1, 1995, by and between MATRIX CAPITAL BANK,
(hereinafter referred to as the "Bank") and GARY LENZO (hereinafter referred to
as the "Employee").

WHEREAS, the Employee has heretofore been employed by the Bank as President and
Chief Executive Officer, and

WHEREAS, the Bank  wishes to assure itself of the services of the Employee as
outlined in Section 5. Term of the original Employment Agreement, and
                       ----                                          

WHEREAS, the parties desire by this writing to set forth the continued
employment relationship of the Bank and the Employee.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed to amend Section 2.  Base Compensation and Section
                                                  -----------------            
5.  Term as follows:
    ----            

2. Base Compensation.  The Bank agrees to pay the Employee during the term of
   -----------------                                                         
   this Addendum, a salary at the rate of $150,000.00 per annum payable in cash
   not less frequently than twice monthly and shall be increased annually in
   such an amount as the Board of Directors may determine.

5. Term. This Addendum extends the period of employment an additional twelve
   ----                                                                      
   (12) months, per performance evaluation by the Board of Directors, as
   outlined in the original Employment Contract, thereby extending the term of
   said Employment Agreement to January 1, 2000.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Employment Agreement
Addendum, on the 16th day of December 1998.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                MATRIX CAPITAL BANK
<S>                                             <C>
 
                                                By:             /s/
                                                      --------------------------
                                                Name: D. Mark Spencer
                                                Its:  Chairman
 
                                                By:             /s/
                                                      --------------------------
                                                Name: Gary Lenzo
</TABLE>
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 773
Acquisition GeometryHome | Acronyms | Contents | Navigation | Profiles | Logs | Metadata | Software | Index PageHome | Acronyms | Contents | Navigation | Profiles | Logs | Metadata | Software | Index Page
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/773/html/fig2.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, July 18, 2013, 04:57:48 PM
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25936]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 15, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community 
Affairs Officer) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204:
    1. Charles Michael Hazard, Boston, Massachusetts; to acquire 18.3 
percent of the voting shares of Boston Private Bancorp, Inc., Boston, 
Massachusetts, and thereby indirectly acquire Boston Private Bank & 
Trust Company, Boston, Massachusetts.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (D. Michael Manies, 
Assistant Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64198-0001:
    1. John Francis Davis and Carman Lee Davis, both of Concordia, 
Kansas; to acquire voting shares of Tri-County Bancshares, Inc., Linn, 
Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire Tri-County National Bank, 
Washington, Kansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 25, 
1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-25936 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
#### Eddie Lee JOHNSON v. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 38766.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.
#### Ezoral WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1212.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 20, 1971.

Ezoral Williams, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                               CET SERVICES, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of CET Services, Inc. for the period ending December 31, 2003:

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of CET
Services, Inc.

         /s/ Dale W. Bleck
------------------------------------
Dale W. Bleck
Chief Financial Officer
March 9, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to CET Services, Inc. and will be
retained by CET Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission upon request.
**Exhibit 21**

**MergeTechnologies Incorporated**

**Subsidiariesas of August 28, 2006**

| **Subsidiary**                      | ** ** | ** ** | ** **          | **Organized  Under the Laws of** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------|------------|------------|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Merge  Technologies, K.K.           |       |       | Japan               |                                            |       |
| Merge Technologies Holdings Co.     |       |       | Nova Scotia, Canada |                                            |       |
| Merge eMed, Inc.                    |       |       | Delaware            |                                            |       |
| Cedara Software (USA) Ltd.          |       |       | Delaware            |                                            |       |
| eFilm Medical, Inc.                 |       |       | Ontario, Canada     |                                            |       |
| Merge Cedara Exchange Co. Limited   |       |       | Ontario, Canada     |                                            |       |
| Cedara Software Corp.               |       |       | Ontario, Canada     |                                            |       |
| Cedara Software (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. |       |       | China               |                                            |       |
| Cedara Software Limited             |       |       | Ontario, Canada     |                                            |       |
| Cedara Software  SARL               |       |       | France              |                                            |       |

 

 

----
Case 3:22-cv-00599-RDM-CA Document 68 Filed 05/03/23 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:22-cv-00599-RDM-CA Document 68 Filed 05/03/23 Page 2 of 9
Case 3:22-cv-00599-RDM-CA Document 68 Filed 05/03/23 Page 3 of 9
Case 3:22-cv-00599-RDM-CA Document 68 Filed 05/03/23 Page 4 of 9
Case 3:22-cv-00599-RDM-CA Document 68 Filed 05/03/23 Page 5 of 9
Case 3:22-cv-00599-RDM-CA Document 68 Filed 05/03/23 Page 6 of 9
Case 3:22-cv-00599-RDM-CA Document 68 Filed 05/03/23 Page 7 of 9
Case 3:22-cv-00599-RDM-CA Document 68 Filed 05/03/23 Page 8 of 9
Case 3:22-cv-00599-RDM-CA Document 68 Filed 05/03/23 Page 9 of 9
DATOS

RÁPIDOS

Departamento del Trabajo de EE.UU.

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA

Para información más completa:

Administración de 

Seguridad y Salud 

Ocupacional

Moho

El moho es un organismo microscópico que se encuentra

por todas partes en el ambiente, en el interior y exterior.

Cuando el moho está presente en cantidades grandes,

tiene el potencial de causar efectos adversos a la salud. 

Efectos en la salud por Exposición al Moho

• Estornudos • Tos y congestión

• Gotereo (goteo) nasal • Empeora el asma

• Ojos irritados • Dermatitis (sarpullido en la piel)

Personas en Mayor Riesgo de Problemas de Salud 

• Individuos con alergias, asma, sinusitis o enfermedades pulmonares. 

• Individuos con un sistema inmunológico debilitado

(por ejemplo: pacientes de VIH)

Cómo Reconocer el Moho

• Vista – Aparece generalmente como una alfombra

peluda de colores.

• Olor – Frecuentemente produce un olor repugnante, a

lugar cerrado y a tierra.

Evitando el Crecimiento de Moho 

• Remueva el exceso de humedad con una aspiradora y

seque el edificio lo antes posible.

• Uso abanicos para ayudar en el proceso de secado.

• Limpie con detergente y agua los materiales y superficies mojadas.

• Deseche todos los materiales dañados por el agua.

• Deseche todos los materiales porosos que han estado

mojados por más de 48 horas.

Consejos para una limpieza de moho general

• Identifique y corrija el problema de humedad.

• Asegúrese que las áreas de trabajo estén bien ventiladas.

• Deseche en bolsas plásticas los materiales dañados

por el moho.

• Limpie con detergente y agua los artículos y superficies mojadas.

• Desinfecte las superficies con 1/4 hasta 11/2 de taza de

blanqueador casero en un galón de agua. CUIDADO:

No mezcle el blanqueador con otros productos de

limpieza que contengan amoniaco.

• Use protección respiratoria. Se recomienda un respirador N-95.

• Use protección para manos y ojos.
#### Evelyn DAVERN, Appellant, v. Michael J. DAVERN, Appellee.

No. 69-746.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 3, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Teltrend Inc. of our report dated August 25, 1997 (except for Note 15, as to 
which the date is September 18, 1997), included in the fiscal year 1997 Annual
Report to Stockholders of Teltrend Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-95316, 33-95314, 333-35683 and 333-00254)
pertaining to stock option plans of Teltrend Inc. of our report dated August
25, 1997 (except for Note 15, as to which the date is September 18, 1997), with
respect to the financial statements incorporated herein by reference.


                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                        ---------------------

Chicago, Illinois
October 24, 1997
10.27 Severability Clause

If any section, provision, or other part of this Ordinance shall be adjudged invalid or unconstitutional said adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision, or other part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. 10.28 When Effective This Ordinance shall become effective upon publication. Approved by the Linn County Board of Supervisors the 28 t " day of January, 2015.

icb- airtS6rso`h Ben Rogers District 3


### ~~;r>~/~I _
~

~ -► 

### ~ S~ ervisor James Houser 

### Di



# ~ upervisor Brent Oleson District 4

~ upervisor John Harris District 5 

### ATTEST: > r--- ~ / 1
~ - , J I Miller, Linn County Au ' or 

### `T 0 Dates read: January 19, 2015 January 21, 2015 January 27, 2015 Published in the Cedar Rapids Gazette on 

# 0 4"n, ,

~ 2015 

# f — Page 108 of 108 Linn County Ordinance #1-1-2015
Exhibit 23.2  CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP  FTD, Inc.:  We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
333-101203 pertaining to the FTD, Inc. 2002 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan and
Form S-8 No. 333-96627 pertaining to the Options Assumed by FTD, Inc.
Originally Granted Under FTD.COM INC. 1999 Equity Incentive Plan) of FTD, Inc.
of our report dated August 1, 2003, with respect to the fiscal 2003
consolidated financial statements and schedule of FTD, Inc. and subsidiaries
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
2003.  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPChicago, IllinoisSeptember 10, 2003