alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT


         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION  AGREEMENT  ("Amendment")  is made
effective as of the 19th day of December by and between  [NAME],  an  individual
("Optionor"),   and  NET   INTEGRATED   SYSTEMS  LTD.,  a  Bermuda   corporation
("Optionee").   Optionor  and/or  Optionee  are  sometimes  herein  referred  to
individually as a "party" and collectively as the "parties."

         This Amendment  shall, and hereby does, amend that certain Stock Option
Agreement  by and between  the parties  hereto  which was made  effective  as of
December  14, 2001  ("Agreement")  so that  notwithstanding  the  provisions  of
Section 1 of the  Agreement,  if the Option (as  defined  in the  Agreement)  is
exercised  because  of an Event of  Default  which  remains  uncured  under that
certain Secured Loan Agreement between Optionee and Accesspoint  Corporation,  a
Nevada  corporation  ("APC"),  and  Optionor  determines  to direct the exercise
proceeds to APC, the exercise  price shall be the lesser of the then fair market
price as quoted on the  Over-The-Counter  Bulletin Board or Two Dollars  ($2.00)
per share.  Section 1, entitled Option Granted, of the Agreement shall be deemed
amended and revised accordingly. The remaining provisions of the Agreement shall
remain unchanged.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  this Amendment is made effective on the date first
set forth above. All provisions of this Amendment are hereby  incorporated  into
the  Agreement.  This  Amendment is to be attached to the Agreement and become a
part of the Agreement.  This Amendment and the Agreement  shall be read together
as a single document.  The provisions contained in this Amendment shall supplant
and replace any conflicting provisions in the Agreement.  The provisions in this
Amendment  shall control over any conflicting  provisions in the Agreement.  All
non-conflicting  provisions  contained  in  the  Agreement  shall  survive  this
Amendment and remain in full force and effect when read in conjunction with this
Amendment.  This  Amendment  may be  executed  simultaneously  in  one  or  more
counterparts,  each of  which  shall be  deemed  an  original,  but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


                                    OPTIONOR:

                                    [NAME]

                                    By:/s/[NAME]
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    [NAME]
                                    --------------------------------------


                                    OPTIONEE:

                                    NET INTEGRATED SYSTEMS LTD.


                                    By:/s/William R. Barber
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    William R. Barber, President



                                  Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25808]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3559-000]


Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation; Notice of Filing

September 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 6, 1997, Niagara Mohawk Power 
Corporation tendered for filing a Certificate of Concurrence in the 
above referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before October 1, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25808 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                    PARAVANT COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED
                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
                For the Years Ended September 30, 1997 and 1996

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                             1997         1996
                                                                                          ----------    ---------
 
<S>                                                                                       <C>           <C>
ADJUSTMENT OF SHARES OUTSTANDING:

Weighted average number of actual common shares outstanding                                7,979,293    5,622,719

Weighted average number of additional common shares outstanding assuming the exercise
  of common stock equivalents(1)                                                           5,268,522    2,029,601
                                                                                          ----------    ---------
Weighted average number of common and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding       13,247,815    7,652,320
                                                                                          ==========    =========
Adjustment of net income, for earnings per share

Actual net income                                                                         $1,141,791    $ 702,153

Adjustment to net income assuming the investment of excess proceeds received from the
  assumed exercise of common stock equivalents at weighted average stock prices, net of
  income taxes                                                                            $  213,630    $  46,212
                                                                                          ----------    ---------
Adjusted net income, for earnings per share                                               $1,355,421    $ 748,365
                                                                                          ==========    =========
Earnings per common share:                                                                       .10          .10

</TABLE>
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) This calculation assumes that of all the additional common shares
outstanding (assuming the exercise of all common stock equivalents) 1,598,730
shares of common stock are re-acquired with the proceeds therefrom as of October
1, 1996 and 1, 591,977 shares are re-acquired as of October 3, 1996.




<PAGE>
Suggested Nationwide Average Fuel 


Properties
 

Assessment and Standards Division 

Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

EPA-420-B-09-018 

April 2009 
Suggested Nationwide Average Fuel Properties
 

User must input desired values such as these
 

or other state/local values into NONROAD2008 Model
 

Year Land 

Diesel S

Marine 

ulfur ppm 

Market Share % 

Ethanol Blen

Vol % 

ds 

2000 2284 2640 13.5 8.2 

2001 2284 2635 14.5 8.2 

2002 2284 2637 17.0 8.2 

2003 2284 2637 22.2 8.2 

2004 2284 2637 27.3 8.2 

2005 2284 2637 31.0 9.3 

2006 2242 2588 41.5 9.3 

2007 1139 1332 46.3 9.3 

2008 351 435 57.5 9.3 

2009 351 435 75.1 9.3 

2010 165 319 78.8 9.5 

2011 32 236 78.8 9.5 

2012 32 124 78.8 9.5 

2013 32 44 78.8 9.5 

2014 20 52 78.8 9.5 

2015 11 56 78.8 9.5 

2016 11 56 78.8 9.5 

2017 11 56 78.8 9.5 

2018 11 55 78.8 9.5 

2019 11 55 78.8 9.5 

2020+ 11 55 78.8 9.5
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of AirNet Communications Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Glenn A. Ehley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ GLENN A. EHLEY                                   
|Glenn A. Ehley Chief Executive Officer March 28, 2005
ACCEPTED

01-15-00018-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

6/12/2015 2:51:30 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 2:51:30 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               11,105,262
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         1,592,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     12,806,249
<PP&E>                                                  659,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       13,933,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 2,895,073
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 5,179,287
<PREFERRED>                                               4,982
<COMMON>                                                182,421
<OTHER-SE>                                            5,665,861
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         13,933,805
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      3,154,194
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     14,189,897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       34,603
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (10,768,924)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (10,768,924)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.74)


</TABLE>
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Ministry Partners Investment Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen A. Ballas, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: March 29, 2004 | MINISTRY PARTNERS INVESTMENT CORPORATION                                            
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                                                     
|                      | By: /s/ Stephen A. BallasStephen A. Ballas
President and Principal Executive Officer
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 02-930 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION 

GLOBE Program 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SAUDI ARABIA 

Signed at Washington September 30, 2002 

with 

Appendices 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
SAUDI ARABIA 

Environmental Cooperation: GLOBE Program 

 Agreement signed at Washington September 30, 2002; 

 Entered into force September 30, 2002. 

 With appendices. 










1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 24, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-41066 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARTURO MENDOZA-JIMENEZ, also known as Mario Jimenez Mendoza, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-02-CR-151-1

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Arturo Mendoza-Jimenez appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being found in the United States afterdeportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. MendozaJimenez argues that the sentencing provisions in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional on their face and as applied in his case. He contends that the unconstitutional portions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 should be severed from the statute. He asks usNo. 02-41066 -2- to vacate his conviction and sentence, reform the judgment to reflect a conviction only under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and remand his case for resentencing under that provision.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Mendoza-Jimenez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been called into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 489-90 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21
United Western Bancorp, Inc. (d/b/a United Western Bancorp)
 1.
    
    United Western Bank  Organized Pursuant to a Federal Savings and Loan Charter2.
    
    Matrix Tower Holdings, LLC   Formed in Delaware3.
    
    Matrix Financial Services Corporation (d/b/a Matrix Home Loan Center, Matrix Capital Mortgage
and Matrix Capital Mortgage Corporation)  Incorporated in Arizona4.
    
    Matrix Insurance Services Corporation  Incorporated in Arizona5.
    
    The Vintage Group, Inc.  Incorporated in Texas6.
    
    Vintage Delaware Holdings, Inc.  Incorporated in Delaware7.
    
    Sterling Trust Company  Incorporated in Texas8.
    
    MSCS Ventures, Inc.  Incorporated in Colorado9.
    
    UW Asset Corp.  Incorporated in Colorado10.
    
    Matrix Bancorp Trading, Inc.  Incorporated in Colorado11.
    
    First Matrix Investment Services Corp. (d/b/a First Matrix Investment Services) 
Incorporated in Texas12.
    
    First Matrix, LLC  Organized in Colorado13.
    
    Matrix Funding Corp.  Incorporated in Colorado14.
    
    Equi-Mor Holdings, Inc.  Incorporated in Nevada15.
    
    New Century Academy Property Management Group, LLC  Organized in Arizona16.
    
    Community Development Funding I, LLC  Organized in Minnesota17.
    
    Charter Facilities Funding, LLC  Organized in Minnesota18.
    
    Charter Facilities Funding I, LLC  Organized in Minnesota19.
    
    Charter Facilities Funding II, LLC  Organized in Minnesota20.
    
    Charter Facilities Funding III, LLC  Organized in Minnesota21.
    
    Charter Facilities Funding IV, LLC  Organized in Colorado22.
    
    Charter Facilities Funding V, LLC  Organized in Colorado23.
    
    Charter Facilities Funding VI, LLC  Organized in Colorado24.
    
    Charter Facilities Funding VII, LLC  Organized in Colorado25.
    
    Charter Facilities Funding VIII, LLC  Organized in Colorado26.
    
    Charter Facilities Funding IX, LLC  Organized in Colorado27.
    
    Charter Facilities Funding X, LLC  Organized in Colorado28.
    
    Matrix Bancorp Capital Trust II  Organized Under Delaware Law29.
    
    Matrix Bancorp Capital Trust III  Organized Under Delaware Law30.
    
    Matrix Bancorp Capital Trust IV  Organized Under Delaware Law31.
    
    Matrix Bancorp Capital Trust V  Organized Under Delaware Law32.
    
    Matrix Bancorp Capital Trust VI  Organized Under Delaware Law33.
    
    Matrix Bancorp Capital Trust VIII- Organized Under Delaware Law
#### AETNA FIRE UNDERWRITER’S INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. The SCHOOL BOARD OF GADSDEN COUNTY, Florida, Appellee.

No. II-441.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 25, 1978.

E. Harper Field of Keen, O’Kelley, Field & Ellis, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jackson G. Beatty, Tallahassee, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs and the record, we find no reversible error.

Accordingly, the final judgment appealed from is AFFIRMED.

The court having considered the motion of counsel for the appellee for allowance of attorney’s fees for services rendered in connection with the instant appeal, it is

ADJUDGED that the sum of $1,000 is awarded as attorney’s fees for counsel for the appellee, Jackson G. Beatty, and for all of which judgment is hereby entered against Aetna Fire Underwriter’s Insurance Company and in favor of Jackson G. Beatty, for which let execution issue, such writ of execution to be issued by the clerk of the trial court.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and MELVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-QSB

[X] Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
    of 1934

For the Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2002

                                       or

[ ] Transitional report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act

                          Commission File No. 000-26649

                                 Voyer Two, Inc.
                                 ---------------
                 (Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)

         Delaware                                       13-4031427
------------------------------            -------------------------------------
State or other jurisdiction of            I.R.S. Employer Identification Number
incorporation or organization

            317 Madison Avenue, Suite 2310, New York, New York 10017
            --------------------------------------------------------
                     (Address of principal executive office)

Issuer's telephone number:  (212) 949-9696
                            --------------

Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) been
subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days.

Yes     X       No
    ----------     -----------

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common
equity, as of the latest practical date: As of November 12, 2002, there were
2,545,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, outstanding.

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):
Yes             No     X
    ----------     -----------


         Voyer Two, Inc. files this amendment to its quarterly report on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 to include as an
exhibit the Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-48692 and333-26117 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 29, 2007, relating to theconsolidated financial statements (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s adoptionof Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R),*Share Based Payment,* using the modifiedprospective method) of the Company appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof The Inventure Group, Inc. for the year ended December 30, 2006.

* *

* *

*/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP*

Phoenix,ArizonaMarch 29, 2007

----