alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 96-403 

________________________________________________________________________ 

TRADE 

Firearms and Ammunition 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and the RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

Signed at Washington April 3, 1996 

 with 

Annexes 

and 

Agreement Amending the Agreement 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington June 25, 2003 and March 4, 2004 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 

 RUSSIAN FEDERATION 

 Trade: Firearms and Ammunition 

Agreement signed at Washington April 3, 1996; 

Entered into force April 3, 1996. 

With annexes. 

And agreement amending the agreement. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Washington 

 June 25, 2003 and March 4, 2004; 

Entered into force March 4, 2004. 
























NOTE: This is an unofficial translation provided by the Government of the Russian Federation. When the official English translation becomes available, it will be added to this publication.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2921 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 529 plans to be 

used for certain non-degree technical training certificate programs, apprenticeship programs, and other training programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Mr. MARSHALL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

529 plans to be used for certain non-degree technical 

training certificate programs, apprenticeship programs, 

and other training programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Workforce 

5 Empowerment Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2921 IS

1 SEC. 2. 529 ACCOUNT FUNDING FOR NON-DEGREE TECH2 NICAL TRAINING CERTIFICATE PROGRAMS, 

3 APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS, AND OTHER 

4 TRAINING PROGRAMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (8) of section 529(c) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 

7 as follows: 

8 ‘‘(8) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN EXPENSES ASSO9 CIATED WITH TECHNICAL TRAINING CERTIFICATE

10 PROGRAMS, REGISTERED APPRENTICESHIP PRO11 GRAMS, AND OTHER TRAINING PROGRAMS.—Any ref12 erence in this subsection to the term ‘qualified high13 er education expense’ shall include a reference to ex14 penses for fees, books, supplies, and equipment re15 quired for the participation of a designated bene16 ficiary in— 

17 ‘‘(A) an apprenticeship program registered 

18 and certified with the Secretary of Labor under 

19 the Act of August 16, 1937 (commonly known 

20 as the ‘National Apprenticeship Act’; 50 Stat. 

21 664, chapter 663; 29 U.S.C. 50 et seq.), 

22 ‘‘(B) a preapprenticeship program as de23 fined in section 681.480 of title 20, Code of 

24 Federal Regulations (or any succeeding regula25 tion), 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 2921 IS

1 ‘‘(C) a program of high school career and 

2 technical education (as the terms ‘high school’ 

3 and ‘career and technical education’ are defined 

4 in section 3 of the Carl D. Perkins Career and 

5 Technical Education Act of 2006 (29 U.S.C. 

6 2302)), or 

7 ‘‘(D) obtaining or maintaining a recog8 nized postsecondary credential as defined in 

9 section 3 of the Workforce Innovation and Op10 portunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102), including test11 ing and other fees required by the organization 

12 issuing the recognized postsecondary credential 

13 as a condition of obtaining or maintaining the 

14 credential.’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 this section shall apply to expenses paid or incurred after 

17 the date of the enactment of this Act for programs begin18 ning after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**INSWEB CORPORATION**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of InsWeb Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to InsWeb Corporation, and will be retainedby InsWeb Corporation and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

 
| **/s/   MARK P. GUTHRIE**        |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Mark P. Guthrie                       |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Dated: May 3, 2004                    |
|                                  |
|                                  |
| **/s/   WILLIAM D.GRIFFIN**      |   |
| William D. Griffin                    |
| Chief Financial Officer               |
| Dated : May 3, 2004                   |

 

----
Office of the Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

April 15, 2002

Dear Sir or Madam:

Arthur  Andersen LLP has  represented  to SOS Staffing  Services,  Inc. that the
audit  completed  as of December 30, 2001 and for the fiscal year then ended was
subject to Arthur  Andersen  LLP's quality  control system for the United States
accounting and audit practice. Arthur Andersen LLP has provided assurance to SOS
Staffing  Services,  Inc.  that the  audit  was  conducted  in  compliance  with
professional standards,  with the appropriate continuity of personnel working on
the audit,  that  national  office  consultation  was available and personnel at
foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen LLP were available to conduct the relevant
portions of the audit.

Sincerely,

/s/ Kevin Hardy
---------------------------
    Kevin Hardy

    Kevin Hardy
    Chief Financial Officer
Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

On January 2, 2013, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) granted Exemption No. 10682 

on Regulator Docket No. FAA-2012-1277 to Air Methods Corporation; Exemption 10682 is 

currently under revision A, dated December 8, 2014. This exemption from 91.411(b) and 

91.413(c) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulation (14 CFR) allows Air Methods to perform air 

traffic control (ATC) transponder and altimeter/altitude reporting equipment tests and 

inspections for its Part 135 aircraft maintained under an Approved Aircraft Inspection Program 

(AAIP). 

There have been no changes in the conditions and reasons relative to the public interest and 

safety to Exemption No. 10682, therefore, Air Methods petitions the Administrator to extend this 

exemption for an additional two year term, or for such longer term as the Administrator may 

deem appropriate. 

If you have any questions concerning this request for an extension please contact me at (303) 

792-7430 or email at Chris.Meinhardt@airmethods.com. 

Christopher R. Meinhardt 

Director of Maintenance 

Air Methods Corporation 

303-792-7 430 

7211 S. PEORIA I ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112 I 303.792.7400 I AIRMETHODS.COM
Case 4:06-cv-00453-JEJ Document 9 Filed 05/08/06 Page 1 of 1
#### Daniel B. NUNN, M.D., Petitioner, v. Mary C. HAGAN and her husband, Arthur P. Hagan, Jr., Respondents.

No. M-272.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Jan. 29, 1970.

James C. Rinaman, Jr., of Marks, Gray, Yates, Conroy & Gibbs, Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Spence, Payne & Masington, and Pod-hurst & Orseck, Miami, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied on the authority of Beta Eta House Corporation, Inc., of Tallahassee et al. v. Gregory, Fla.App., 230 So.2d 495, in the records of this court, opinion filed on January 20, 1970.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
PUBLIC LAW 104–3—MAR. 7, 1995 109 STAT. 47

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 257:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):

Feb. 10, considered and passed Senate.

Feb. 28, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 104–3

104th Congress

An Act

To amend the charter of the Veterans of Foreign Wars to make eligible for membership those veterans that have served within the territorial limits of South Korea.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section

5 of the Act of May 28, 1936 (36 U.S.C. 115), is amended to

read as follows:

‘‘SEC. 5. A person may not be a member of the corporation

created by this Act unless that person—

‘‘(1) served honorably as a member of the Armed Forces

of the United States in a foreign war, insurrection, or expedition, which service has been recognized as campaign-medal

service and is governed by the authorization of the award

of a campaign badge by the Government of the United States;

or

‘‘(2) while a member of the Armed Forces of the United

States, served honorably on the Korean peninsula or in its

territorial waters for not less than 30 consecutive days, or

a total of 60 days, after June 30, 1949.’’.

Approved March 7, 1995.

Mar. 7, 1995

[S. 257]
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2786 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to include 

the provision of tree nuts under the seniors farmers’ market nutrition 

program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. TUBERVILLE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act 

of 2002 to include the provision of tree nuts under 

the seniors farmers’ market nutrition program, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farmers’ Market Ex5 pansion Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENIORS FARMERS’ MARKET NUTRITION PROGRAM. 

7 Section 4402(b)(1) of the Farm Security and Rural 

8 Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 3007(b)(1)) is amended 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2786 IS

1 by striking ‘‘and herbs’’ and inserting ‘‘herbs, and tree 

2 nuts’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

BRIAN COHEN, 

Petitioner, I Civil Action No. 04-283 Erie 

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF 

PROBATION AND PAROLE, et al., I 

Respondents. I 

MEMORANDUM ORDER 

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on September 28, 

2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for 

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. 5 

636(b)(I), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 201, filed on 

January 20, 2006, recommended that Petitioner's Petition dismissed and that a 

certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (I 0) days from the 

date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and 

on Defendants. Objections were filed on January 27, 2006 [Doc. No. 211. After & 

novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and 

Recommendation, and objections thereto, the following order is entered: 

AND NOW, this 31" day of January, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiffs Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 

is DISMISSED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 201 of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed 

on January 20, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. 

S/ Sean J. McLaughlin United States District Judge 

cm: All parties of record 

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:04-cv-00283-SJM-SPB Document 22 Filed 01/31/06 Page 1 of 1
#### Mrs. Georgia LEWIS v. QUALITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and the City of Biloxi.

No. 49265.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 6, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 14, 1977.

Sekul, Hornsby & Wallace, Thomas L. Wallace, Biloxi, for appellant.

Vlahos & Caranna, Cono A. Caranna, II, Matt G. Lyons, Biloxi, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Harrison County; Frank W. Alexander, Chancellor.

Before INZER, P. J., and SUGG and LEE, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

GILLESPIE, C. J., PATTERSON, P. J., and SMITH, ROBERTSON, WALKER and BROOM, JJ., concur.

Rehearing Denied; Walker, J., took no part in this dicision.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Periodic Financial Report
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned, William W. Burke, the chief financial officer of Encore Medical
Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies that: (i) this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 16, 2005/s/ William W. BurkeWilliam W. Burke
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 6/30/99 FORM
10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>             0001077568
<NAME>            SNELLING TRAVEL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>      1

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          46,329
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,329
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,302
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,525
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,329
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,981)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,981)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,981)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7584
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus VICTOR RAMON LOVE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-00-31, CA-02-86-4-H) Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 25, 2003 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Ramon Love, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Victor Ramon Love seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Love has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 123 S.Ct. 1029 (U.S. Feb. 25, 2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Clifford HARDY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-398.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 5, 1969.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A. motion was considered by the trial court to be frivolous and was denied.

After having considered the briefs and the record, we are compelled to affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion.

LILES, A. C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To: Microfield Group, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference on Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Numbers 33-97544 and 333-33294) of Microfield Group, Inc. of our report,
which includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, dated February 24, 2006,
included in Microfield Group, Inc. 's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the years
ended December 31, 2005 and January 1, 2005

                  /s/ RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP
                  ---------------------------------------------
                   Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP

McLean, Virginia
April 5, 2006
Exhibit 31.2

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

I, Mark E. Lemma, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amendment number one to annual report on Form 10-KSB of ALCiS Health, Inc. (registrant) for the year ended
March 31, 2007;

2. Based on my knowledge, this amendment does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this amendment report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



|                     |  |                               
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Dated: July 29, 2007 |  | /s/ MARK E. LEMMA             
|                     |  | Mark E. Lemma                 
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer       
|                     |  | (Principal Accounting Officer)



18
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2976 

To ensure that expenses relating to the acquisition or use of devices for 

use in the detection of fentanyl, xylazine, and other emerging adulterant 

substances, including test strips are allowable expenses under certain 

grant programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Mr. BOOKER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To ensure that expenses relating to the acquisition or use 

of devices for use in the detection of fentanyl, xylazine, 

and other emerging adulterant substances, including test 

strips are allowable expenses under certain grant programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Overdoses 

5 with Test Strips Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2976 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDING THE 21ST CENTURY CURES ACT TO AU2 THORIZE THE USE OF FUNDS FOR DEVICES 

3 FOR USE IN THE DETECTION OF FENTANYL, 

4 XYLAZINE, AND OTHER EMERGING 

5 ADULTERANT SUBSTANCES. 

6 Section 1003 of the 21st Century Cures Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 290ee–3a) is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (b)(4), by adding at the end 

9 the following: 

10 ‘‘(G) Providing assistance for expenses re11 lating to the acquisition or use of adulterant 

12 substance detection devices.’’; and 

13 (2) in subsection (h)— 

14 (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) 

15 through (4) as paragraphs (2) through (5), re16 spectively; and 

17 (B) by inserting before paragraph (2) (as 

18 so redesignated), the following: 

19 ‘‘(1) ADULTERANT SUBSTANCE DETECTION DE20 VICE.—The term ‘adulterant substance detection de21 vice’ means a device, including a test strip, that can 

22 detect the presence of an adulterant, such as 

23 fentanyl, xylazine, or another adulterant in a drug 

24 sample prior to use of a controlled substance.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 2976 IS

1 SEC. 3. AMENDING THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT TO 

2 AUTHORIZE THE USE OF FUNDS FOR DE3 VICES FOR USE IN THE DETECTION OF 

4 FENTANYL, XYLAZINE, AND OTHER EMERG5 ING ADULTERANT SUBSTANCES. 

6 Part A of title V of the Public Health Service Act 

7 (42 U.S.C. 290aa et seq.) is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following: 

9 ‘‘SEC. 506B. USE OF FUNDS FOR DEVICES FOR USE IN THE 

10 DETECTION OF FENTANYL, XYLAZINE, AND 

11 OTHER EMERGING ADULTERANT SUB12 STANCES. 

13 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Expenses relating to the acquisi14 tion or use of adulterant substance detection devices shall 

15 be allowable expenses under any grant, contract, or coop16 erative agreement entered into by the Substance Abuse 

17 and Mental Health Services Administration under this 

18 Act. 

19 ‘‘(b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term 

20 ‘adulterant substance detection device’ has the meaning 

21 given such term in section 1003(h)(1) of the 21st Century 

22 Cures Act.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB