alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25615]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3553-000 and ER97-3556-000]


Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation and ROXDEL; Notice of 
Issuance of Order

September 23, 1997.
    ROXDEL (ROXDEL), a power marketer, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of 
Rochester Gas & Electric Company. ROXDEL filed an application for 
authorization to sell power at market-based rates, and for certain 
waivers and authorizations. In particular, ROXDEL requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liabilities by ROXDEL. On 
September 12, 1997, the Commission issued an Order Accepting For Filing 
Proposed Market-Based Rates (Order), in the above-docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's September 12, 1997 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (D), (E), and (G):
    (D) Within 30 days of the date of issuance of this order, any 
person desiring to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket 
approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by 
ROXDEL should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (E) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (D) above, ROXDEL is hereby authorized to issue 
securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of ROXDEL, compatible with the 
public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (G) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of ROXDEL's 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is October 14, 1997.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25615 Filed 9-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

RAUL MUNOZ, 

 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

WARDEN CLAIR DOLL, 

 Respondent. 

 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

 Civil No. 4:20-cv-1380 

 

 Judge Sylvia H. Rambo 

O R D E R 

AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2020, upon consideration of the 

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, and noting that no objections have 

been filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the report and recommendation (Doc. 

12) is ADOPTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED AS 

MOOT and that the Clerk of Court is instructed to CLOSE THE CASE. 

 s/Sylvia H. Rambo 

 United States District Judge 

Case 4:20-cv-01380-SHR Document 14 Filed 11/10/20 Page 1 of 1
#### Robert Owens McNUTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-224.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 31, 1971.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; W. Rogers Turner, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### William THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 49964, 50486.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 23, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 28, 1977.

Louis M. Jepeway, Jr., Special Asst. Public Defender, of Jepeway, Gassen & Jepe-way, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

ADKINS, Justice.

These are consolidated appeals, one of which is from a judgment convicting defendant of first degree murder, involuntary sexual battery, and kidnapping, resulting in a sentence of death and concurrent sentences of life imprisonment. We have jurisdiction of this appeal.

The other appeal is from an order of the trial court denying defendant’s motion to set aside the imposition of the sentences pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850. This appeal was transferred to us by the District Court of Appeal.

The defendant, after withdrawing pleas of not guilty, entered pleas of guilty in all charges and was adjudged guilty. His waiver of the penalty hearing over the objection of the state attorney was refused by trial judge. The jury recommended the death penalty. The sentences were then imposed.

Defendant, through counsel other than trial counsel, then filed a motion to vacate the sentences and the withdrawal of the guilty pleas on the ground that the pleas were induced by a commitment of the trial judge which was communicated to him by his court-appointed counsel. The motion was bolstered by written statements of .trial counsel. The record is sufficient to bring this case squarely within the rule pronounced by this Court in *Costello v. State,*260 So.2d 198 (Fla.1972).

The pleas were based on a failure of communication or misunderstanding of the facts. In the colloquy preceding the plea the defendant was not asked if any promises were made to him. The defendant has established to our satisfaction that he was prejudiced by an honest misunderstanding which contaminated the voluntariness of the pleas.

The judgments and sentences are reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial judge with instructions to grant the motion for withdrawal of the guilty pleas and proceed to trial.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,483
<SECURITIES>                                    41,655
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,129
<INVENTORY>                                        206
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,994
<PP&E>                                           8,160
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,923
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3192
<BONDS>                                            594
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,779
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,721
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,923
<SALES>                                          2,257
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,257
<CGS>                                            1,296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    24
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (548)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,119)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,119)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,119)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)


</TABLE>
#### Mary Ellen Sheehan PEREZ v. Chalin O. PEREZ and Whitney National Bank.

No. 61321.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 13, 1978.

In re: Chalin 0. Perez, applying for remedial writs of review and stay order. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied and stay order recalled.

SANDERS, C. J., SUMMERS, and MARCUS, JJ.,

are of the opinion that a writ should be granted, being of the view that the State Court lacks jurisdiction. Section 7422(a) Internal Revenue Code; *Enochs v. Williams,*370 U.S. 1, 82 S.Ct. 1125, 8 L.Ed.2d 292 (1962).
#### James E. MATNEY v. Roy W. RUSSELL, Chairman Florida Probation and Parole Commission.

No. 38986.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF MAIC HOLDINGS, INC.


Mutual Assurance, Inc. (Alabama)
        Mutual Assurance Agency of Ohio, Inc. (Ohio)
        MAI Corporation (Delaware)
                Mutual Assurance Agency, Inc. (Alabama)
                PROActive Insurance Corporation (Alabama)
                Educational Services Institute, Inc. (Alabama)

Medical Assurance of West Virginia, Inc. (West Virginia)
Physicians Insurance Company of Indiana (Indiana)
MOMED Holding Co. (Missouri)
        Missouri Medical Insurance Company (Missouri)
        Professional Liability Associates, Inc. (Missouri)
        Momedico Professional Services, Inc. (Missouri)
#### Levi McKENZIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1527.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 27, 1977.

Richard W. Springer of Kohl, Springer *&*Springer, Palm Springs, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Marsha G. Madorsky and Harry M. Hipler, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

OPINION ON ORDER DENYING BAIL PENDING APPEAL

ALDERMAN, Chief Judge.

Defendant seeks review of an order denying bail pending appeal. The determinative question is whether the trial court, under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.691(a) (effective July 1, 1977) has any discretion to allow bail pending appeal to a person who has .previously been convicted of a felony, the commission of which occurred prior to the commission of the subsequent felony.

The relevant portion of the current rule 3.691(a) provides that “in no case shall bail be granted if such person has previously been convicted of a felony.” This differs from the former rule, which said that “a person may be denied bail upon appeal from conviction of a felony if such person had previously been convicted of a felony.” Clearly the former rule allowed the exercise of judicial discretion; just as clearly, the current rule is mandatory and allows no basis for the exercise of judicial discretion.

' Defendant cites *Bamber v. State,*300 So.2d 269 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974) and *Rolle v. State,*314 So.2d 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975), in support of his position. These cases, however, are ntí longer applicable. Both involve a conflict between the former Section 903.132, Florida Statutes (1974) and former Rule 3.691(a), and were decided on the basis that the legislature cannot deprive the court of its discretion to determine whether bail should be granted pursuant to a rule of criminal procedure. In the present case we do not have a conflict between the legislative and judicial branches of government. The Supreme Court of Florida, by its promulgation of Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.691(a) (effective July 1, 1977), has said “in no case shall bail be granted if such person has previously been convicted of a felony.” We assume that the Supreme Court meant what it said.

The trial court’s order denying bail pending appeal is affirmed.

DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 188 (Monday, September 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25768]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 97-140]


NASA Advisory Council, Life and Microgravity Sciences and 
Applications Advisory Committee, NASA-NIH Advisory Subcommittee on 
Behavioral and Biometical Research; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council, Life and Microgravity 
Sciences and Applications Advisory Committee, NASA-NIH Advisory 
Subcommittee on Behavioral and Biomedical Research.

DATES: October 23, 1997, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.; and October 24, 1997, 
8:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: NASA Headquarters, Room 7H46, 300 E Street SW, Washington, 
DC 20546

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Joan Vernikos, Code UL, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-2530.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

<bullet> OLMSA/NIH Overview
<bullet> Biology Pillars Update
<bullet> National Space Biomedical Research Institute Briefing
<bullet> Update of NASA-NIH Activities
<bullet> Neurovestibular NSCORT
<bullet> Protein Crystallography
<bullet> Remote Sensing/Disease Prediction Program
<bullet> Recent Flight Research Findings

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: September 22, 1997.
Leslie M. Nolan,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-25768 Filed 9-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
June 25, 2015

MD Morgan 6250 North Keeney Circle Prescott Valley, AZ 86314

Dear MD Morgan:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 16, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2170), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT
99.2






MIDDLESEX
WATER COMPANY


Subsidiaries
and Affiliates





DIVIDEND
REINVESTMENT AND COMMON STOCK PURCHASE


EMPLOYEE


AUTHORIZATION
FORM FOR PAYROLL DEDUCTION








THE
MIDDLESEX WATER COMPANY IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO WITHHOLD THE AMOUNT INDICATED
BELOW FROM MY PAYCHECK WEEKLY.










$_____________





EMPLOYEE
NAME ___________________________________




EMPLOYEE ADDRESS
______________________________________




________________________________________________________________





SOCIAL
SECURITY NUMBER _____________________________





Date
of birth___________________(Must be 21 to participate)




SIGNATURE
_________________________DATE ___________________













Minimum
payroll deduction of $5 weekly


Maximum
of $100 weekly


Employees
on Bi-Weekly payroll will have twice the amount listed above
withheld.








CJS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2443]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3660]


NW Ayer, Inc.; Prohibited Trade Practices, and Affirmative 
Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition., this consent prohibits, among other things, the New York-
based advertising agency from misrepresenting the absolute or 
comparative amount of cholesterol, total fat, saturated fat, or any 
other fatty acid in eggs or in any meat, dairy, or poultry product, and 
from misrepresenting the existence or results of any test or study.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued May 31, 1996.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theodore Hoppock, FTC/S-4002, 
Washington, D.C. 20580. (202) 326-3087.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Tuesday, March 26, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 61 FR 13202, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of NW Ayer, Inc., for the purpose 
of soliciting public comment. Interested parties were given sixty (60) 
days in which to submit comments, suggestions or objections regarding 
the proposed form of the order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to cease and 
desist, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45, 52)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2443 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Company



|                                 |  |                               
|-------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Entity Name                      |  | State/Country of Incorporation
|ASIC Design Service, Inc.        |  | Delaware                      
|TranSwitch S.A.                  |  | France                        
|Horizon Semiconductors, Inc.     |  | Virginia                      
|Opal Acquisition Corporation     |  | Delaware                      
|Systems On Silicon, Inc.         |  | New Jersey                    
|TranSwitch Asia PTE Ltd.         |  | Singapore                     
|TranSwitch Asia Ltd.             |  | Hong Kong                     
|TranSwitch II Corp.              |  | Delaware                      
|TranSwitch III, Inc.             |  | Delaware                      
|TranSwitch Europe N.V./S.A.      |  | Belgium                       
|TranSwitch India Private Limited |  | India                         
|TranSwitch International Corp.   |  | Delaware                      
|Lehman Silicon Solutions S.A.    |  | Switzerland                   
|TranSwitch Silicon Valley, Inc.  |  | California                    
|TranSwitch (Israel) Ltd          |  | Israel                        
|TX Holdings Inc.                 |  | Delaware
#### CORAK CONSTRUCTION CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. William GIVNER, Appellee.

No. 70-798.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 18, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 11, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Charles D. CHASE v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA.

No. 60085.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 2, 1977.

In re: Charles D. Chase applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Jackson, 345 So.2d 969.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the court below, there is no error of law in the judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (118)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,663
<PP&E>                                          12,655
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (3,674)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,371
<BONDS>                                          1,460
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,633
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,852
<SALES>                                          8,617
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,617
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,027
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    97
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,077)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,077)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,077)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.37)


</TABLE>