alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21
    
                SUBSIDIARIES OF SITEL CORPORATION
    
                                                STATE OR OTHER
                                               JURISDICTION OF
         NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                    INCORPORATION
         
          SITEL Insurance Services, Inc.             Nebraska
          Financial Insurance Services, Inc.         Nebraska
          SITEL Investments, Inc.                    Nebraska
          SITEL Software, Inc.                       Nebraska
          SITEL International, Inc.                  Nebraska
          National Action Financial Services, Inc.   Georgia
          Support Associates, Inc.                   California
          SITEL Technical Services, Inc.             Wisconsin
          SITEL Teleservices Canada Inc.             Canada
          SITEL Hispanica, S.A.                      Spain
          SITEL Europe plc                           United Kingdom
          SITEL Asia Pacific Holdings Pte Ltd.       Singapore
          SITEL Moor Park Limited                    United Kingdom
          The Decisions Group Limited                United Kingdom
          SITEL Brussels NV                          Belgium
          Merit Direct Limited                       United Kingdom
          Merit Direct [Services] Limited            United Kingdom
          Decisions [Services] Limited               United Kingdom
          SITEL Moor Park [Services] Limited         United Kingdom
          SITEL GmbH                                 Germany
          SITEL Iberica Teleservices, S.A.           Spain
          Tele Promotion, S.A.                       Spain
          Action Data Base, S.A.                     Spain
          Action Servicos de Publicidade, S.A.       Portugal
          B's Telemarketing Limited                  United Kingdom
          SITEL Singapore Pte Ltd                    Singapore
          SITEL Telebusiness New Zealand Limited     New Zealand
          SITEL Telebusiness Australia Pty Limited   Australia
          SITEL Telebusiness Singapore Pte Ltd       Singapore
          SITEL Levita Pty Ltd                       New South Wales
          L & R Group Limited                        United Kingdom
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 Statement Re: Computation of Earnings to
Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
  Year ended December 31,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Earnings:Income from continuing
operations before minority
interest in consolidated
subsidiaries and income or
loss from equity investees
    
    $
    38,872
    
    
    $
    36,117
    
    
    $
    32,033
    
    
    $
    29,190
    
    
    $
    27,531Fixed charges
    
    
    32,006
    
    
    
    24,352
    
    
    
    25,296
    
    
    
    25,534
    
    
    
    20,805Preferred dividend
requirements of consolidated
subsidiaries
    
    
    (2,512
    )
    
    
    (4,123
    )
    
    
    (7,168
    )
    
    
    (8,818
    )
    
    
    (5,093
    )Earnings (1)
    
    
    68,366
    
    
    
    56,346
    
    
    
    50,161
    
    
    
    45,906
    
    
    
    43,243Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    
    28,501
    
    
    
    19,439
    
    
    
    17,408
    
    
    
    15,102
    
    
    
    14,664Amortization of financing fees
    
    
    993
    
    
    
    790
    
    
    
    720
    
    
    
    1,614
    
    
    
    1,048Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    2,512
    
    
    
    4,123
    
    
    
    7,168
    
    
    
    8,818
    
    
    
    5,093Fixed charges (2)
    
    $
    32,006
    
    
    $
    24,352
    
    
    $
    25,296
    
    
    $
    25,534
    
    
    $
    20,805Ratio of earnings to combined
fixed charges and preferred
stock dividends
(1)/(2)
    
    
    2.14
    
    
    
    2.31
    
    
    
    1.98
    
    
    
    1.80
    
    
    
    2.08
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Med-Design Corporation

Ventura, California

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-05927, 333-22201, 333-31858,
333-65472, 333-86432, 333-99161, 333-108759 and 333-115511) and S-8
(Registration Nos. 333-75957, 333-90933, 333-49194 and 333-99163) of The
Med-Design Corporation of our reports dated March 29, 2005 relating to the
consolidated financial statements, and the effectiveness of the Med-Design
Corporation's internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this
Form 10-K.



/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Los Angeles, California

March 30, 2005
#### WHITE STAR REALTY CO., a corporation, Appellant, v. Emanuel M. SCHREIBER, Appellee.

No. 69-341.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 23, 1969.

Joseph I. Davis, Miami, for appellant.

Shalle Stephen Fine, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PEARSON, Chief Judge.

The appellant, defendant in the trial court, urges on this appeal that the court misinterpreted the legal effect of a lease. The appellant is the owner of a neighborhood shopping center and is appellee’s landlord. The complaint filed by the appellee tenant prayed for an injunction to prevent the landlord from leasing an adjacent store space for a business which would be in direct competition with the appellee. After trial the court entered the injunction prayed for and this appeal followed.

*301Paragraph 22 of the lease between the parties provided:

> “Premises shall he used for the following purposes and no other: sale of fruit juices, souvenirs, handbags, greeting cards, sundries, film, beachwear, tobacco, newspapers and magazines, fruit shipping products, gifts and novelties, fruit salad, package icecream, bottled sodas, and candy; it being clearly the intent of the parties that the Tenant may sell no food other than that set out herein, and further, may sell nothing that competes with any other tenant in the building in which the demised premises are located.”

The court concluded as a matter of law that this paragraph was an agreement imposing “reciprocal obligations; on the tenant to sell in conformity therewith, and on the landlord not to install the Plaintiff tenant’s competition in the center.” We agree with this conclusion.

A court should give the terms of a contract a reasonable construction, a construction that will not give one party an unfair advantage over the other, and should avoid giving a construction that would lead to absurd results. James v. Gulf Life Ins. Co., Fla.1953, 66 So.2d 62. As the trial court observed, if a competing business were permitted in a store adjacent to ap-pellee’s the appellee would be in violation of his lease by continuing his own business. Such an unreasonable and absurd result cannot have been the intention of the parties. The only interpretation of paragraph 22 that will accord with the principles stated in the James case is the reasonable interpretation made by the trial court.

We have examined all points the appellant has raised and concluded that they do not demonstrate reversible error.

Affirmed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2918 

To reauthorize the program of surveillance and education regarding infections 

associated with illicit drug use and other risk factors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Ms. BALDWIN, and Mr. YOUNG) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the program of surveillance and education 

regarding infections associated with illicit drug use and 

other risk factors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAM. 

4 Section 317N(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 247b–15(d)) is amended by striking ‘‘2019 

6 through 2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2024 through 2028’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AIRNET
COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION'S BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOW FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         100,423
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,674
<INVENTORY>                                     15,978
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               127,023
<PP&E>                                          11,794
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,548
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,240
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,013
<SALES>                                         17,756
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,756
<CGS>                                           11,244
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,701
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     4
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,579)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,579)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,579)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (18.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (18.31)


</TABLE>
### Ground water in San Joaquin Valley, California

By: Walter Curran MendenhallRichard Bryant DoleHerman Stabler

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp398

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-49810)  pertaining to the Employee Incentive Plan of Tarrant Apparel
Group of our  report  dated  March 14,  2003 with  respect  to the  consolidated
financial  statements  and schedule of Tarrant  Apparel  Group and  subsidiaries
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.


                                              /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Los Angeles, California
May 13, 2003
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**INSWEBCORPORATION**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Hussein A. Enan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of InsWebCorporation, certify that:

(1)                                  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of InsWeb Corporation;

(2)                                  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

(3)                                  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

(4)                                  The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), for theregistrant and we have:

a.           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.           Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

(5)                                  The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors:

a.           All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
|                         | **/s/ HUSSEIN A. ENAN**              |
|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| Dated: August  14, 2007 | **Hussein A. Enan**                  |
|                    | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Len Charlton SCOTT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-471.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 20, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 19, 1978.

Philip Carlton, Jr., Miami, and Sheldon “Skip” Taylor, Surf side, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Linda Collins Hertz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Bernhardt v. State,*288 So.2d 490 (Fla.1974).
FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Court of Appeals District

CATHY S. LUSK, CL

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

FILE COPY

2/11/2015

MOORE, DAVINA WILSON Tr. Ct. No. 007-1663-11

COANo. 12-13-00041-CR

PD-1045-14

Pursuant to Rule 69.4(a) T.R.A.P., the record is returned to the court of appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
DATOS

RÁPIDOS

Departamento del Trabajo de EE.UU.

www.osha.gov (800) 321-OSHA

Para un información más completa:

Administración de 

Seguridad y Salud 

Ocupacional

Protéjase

La Gripe Aviar Empleados de Laboratorios

La gripe aviar, es una enfermedad viral y puede ser muy contagiosa

y hasta causar la muerte en aves (ej., pollos). De gran preocupación son los virus altamente patogénicos de gripe aviar, (HPAI)

H5N1, los cuales han causado la muerte a millones de aves y han

infectado a humanos en otros países. Si estos virus se encontraran

en los Estados Unidos, tome las precauciones apropiadas.

Los Síntomas de la Gripe Aviar en Humanos

Varían desde: fiebre, tos, dolor de garganta y dolores musculares; a diarrea, infecciones oculares, neumonía, y enfermedades

respiratorias serias. Los síntomas de la gripe aviar pueden variar

según el virus que haya causado la infección, pero son con frecuencia similares a los que están asociados con la gripe de temporada en humanos.

Precauciones para Trabajadores de Laboratorios

HPAI H5N1, es clasificada como un agente seleccionado y 

debe de tratarse bajo condiciones optimizadas al Nivel de

Bioseguridad (BSL por sus siglas en Inglés) a nivel 3 con intensificaciones. Estas condiciones incluyen procedimientos para BSL

3 además de lo siguientes;

• acceso controlado, entrada de puerta doble con sala de vestir

y ducha;

• uso de duchas para el personal antes de salir;

• decontaminación de todo residuo y 

• use un respirador N95, como mínimo.

Consideraciones Clave

• Estudios de cultivo de virus en espécimenes respiratorios de

pacientes de los que se sospecha que puedan tener infecciones de HPAI H5N1, NO deben de intentarse excepto bajo

condiciones estrictamente optimizadas al Nivel de

Bioseguridad 3 con intensificaciones.

• Si un laboratorio clínico no tiene las condiciones óptimas al

nivel BSL 3, no se debe ordenar estudios de aislamiento del

virus a pacientes quienes se sospecha puedan tener una infección de H5N1. 

• Los ensayos moleculares (e.j, RT-PCR) o pruebas comerciales

de detención de antígeno puede conducirse en espécimenes

clínicos de casos sospechosos de HPAI H5N1, usando normas

de trabajo regulares de BSL 2.

Guía adicional

• Póngase la vacuna contra la gripe de temporada.

• Si a usted se le desarrollan síntomas similares a los de la

gripe, permanezca en su casa, excepto para recibir atención

medica.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5033-5034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2607]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[CA-067-7122-6606; CACA-35511]


Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for 
the Proposal Imperial Project, California

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the Federal Register of November 1, 1996 (Vol. 61, p. 
56567), a notice was published pertaining to the availability of the 
draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for 
the proposed Imperial Project. This amends that notice.
    Because of expressed interest, a public hearing will be held at the 
Barbara Worth Convention Center in Holtville, California at 6:30 PST to 
8:30 PST on Thursday February 6, 1997. Furthermore, the comment period 
on

[[Page 5034]]

the draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report is 
extended an additional 13 days through February 13, 1997. Written 
comments should be sent to the Bureau of Land Management, 1661 South 
Fourth Street, El Centro, California, 92251, Attention: Keith Shone, 
and must be delivered or postmarked no later than February 13, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Shone (619) 337-4412 or Thomas 
Zale (619) 337-4420.

    Dated: January 28, 1997.
Thomas Zale,
Acting Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-2607 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                      1
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The
Med-Design Corporation and subsidiaries Consolidated Statement of Operations for
the year ended December 31, 1997 and balance sheet as at December 31, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       114,079
<SECURITIES>                               6,163,875
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           6,430,501
<PP&E>                                     1,588,262
<DEPRECIATION>                               406,781
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             8,293,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      5,248,988
<BONDS>                                      154,674
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      79,516
<OTHER-SE>                                 2,809,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               8,293,030
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           421,967
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (5,219,833)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (5,219,833)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                              (5,219,833)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.66)




</TABLE>
#### Teddy Dean WATSON, Appellant, v. Mary Lou SPANGLER, a/k/a Mary Lou Moore; Carolyn R. Spangler, a minor by her mother and next friend, Mary Lou Spangler, a/k/a Mary Lou Moore; and Jack R. Hout, Appellees.

No. 69-191.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

April 25, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; George E. Adams, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.