alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                          Subsidiaries of the Company

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
---------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
                           Name                                                 Jurisdiction
 --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
 <S>                                                       <C>
 ADV Engineering                                            France
 --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
 Alacrity Communications, Inc.                              California
 --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
 Easics, N.V.                                               Belgium
 --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
 Horizon Semiconductors, Inc.                               Virginia
 --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
 TranSwitch II Corp.                                        Delaware
 --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
 TranSwitch III Corp.                                       Delaware
 --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
 TranSwitch Europe N.V./S.A.                                Belgium
 --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
 TranSwitch Foreign Sales Corporation                       U.S. Virgin Islands
 --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
 TranSwitch India Private Limited                           India
 --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
 TranSwitch International Corp.                             Delaware
 --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
 TranSwitch SA                                              Switzerland
 --------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25815]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-297-002]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Refund Report

September 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 19, 1997, Florida Gas Transmission 
Company (``FGT'') tendered for filing with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission a report of transition cost recovery (``TCR'') 
refunds distributed to FGT's eligible shippers on August 29, 1997. In 
compliance with the Commission's Letter Order dated July 29, 1997 in 
Docket No. RP97-297-001, FGT allocated a total refund of $1,349,573.55, 
including interest through the refund date, on a pro rata basis based 
on actual recoveries from FGT's shippers during the month of April, 
1997, the month in which the TCR overcollections occurred.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426 in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
by Section 154.210 of the Commission's rules and regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene.
    Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are 
available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25815 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Social, Behavioral and Economic 
Sciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Social, Behavioral, and Economic 
Sciences (1766).
    Date and Time: October 20, 1997; 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 390, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Va.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Ann Lanier, Senior Analyst, Division of Sciences 
Resources Studies; Research and Development Statistics Program; 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Suite 965; Arlington, VA 22230; Telephone: (703) 306-
1772, ext. 6937; Fax: (703) 306-0508; Internet: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#47262b26292e22350729342169202831"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="accdc0cdc2c5c9deecc2dfca82cbc3da">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person at the above 
address.
    Purpose of Meeting: To review and comment on issues affecting 
the Survey of Scientific and Engineering Research Facilities at 
Colleges and Universities.
    Agenda: The morning will be used by the advisory panel to 
comment on broad data-related policy issues affecting the survey. 
The afternoon will be used to discuss specific data issues relevant 
to data users and policy people.

    Dated: September 29, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26143 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# EUR-Lex - 41976D0787 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 41976D0787

**76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom: Decision of the representatives of the Member States meeting in the council relating to the Act concerning the election of the representatives of the Assembly by direct universal suffrage **

*
Official Journal L 278 , 08/10/1976 P. 0001 - 0004 *

DECISION (76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL

composed of the representatives of the Member States and acting unanimously,

Having regard to Article 21 (3) of the Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community,

Having regard to Article 138 (3) of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Article 108 (3) of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,

Having regard to the proposal from the Assembly,

Intending to give effect to the conclusions of the European Council in Rome on 1 and 2 December 1975, that the election of the Assembly should be held on a single date within the period May/June 1978,

Has laid down the provisions annexed to this Decision which it recommends to the Member States for adoption in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.

This Decision and the provisions annexed hereto shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

The Member States shall notify the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Communities without delay of the completion of the procedures necessary in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements for the adoption of the provisions annexed to this Decision.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den tyvende september nitten hundrede og seksoghalvfjerds.

Geschehen zu Brüssel am zwanzigsten September neunzehnhundertsechsundsiebzig.

Done at Brussels on the twentieth day of September in the year one thousand nine hundred and seventy-six.

Fait à Bruxelles, le vingt septembre mil neuf cent soixante-seize.

Arna dhéanamh sa Bhruiséil, an fichiú lá de mhí Mhéan Fómhair, míle naoi gcéad seachtó a sé.

Fatto a Bruxelles, addì venti settembre millenovecentosettantasei.

Gedaan te Brussel, de twintigste september negentienhonderd zesenzeventig.

For Rådet for De europæiske Fællesskaber

Für den Rat der Europäischen Gemeinschaften

For the Council of the European Communities

Pour le Conseil des Communautés européennes

Thar ceann Chomhairle na gComhphobal Eorpach

Per il Consiglio delle Comunità europee

Voor de Raad van de Europese Gemeenschappen

Formand

Der Präsident

The President

Le président

An t-Uachtaran

Il Presidente

De Voorzitter >PIC FILE= "T0010317">

>PIC FILE= "T0010318">

>PIC FILE= "T0010319">
EXHIBIT 10.20(a)

                       AMENDMENT TO FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT
                       AND PAYMENT OF INTEREST WITH STOCK
   CAN-CAL RESOURCES LTD. AND FIRST COLONY MERCHANT AND TOBIAN TRADING LIMITED

                                January 29, 2002

     This Amendment is entered into between Can-Cal Resources Ltd. (the
"Borrower") and First Colony Merchant and Tobian Trading Limited (collectively
the "Lender").

     Whereas, the Lender loaned Borrower $300,000 on or about November 23, 2000
under a Loan Agreement, requiring interest to be paid semiannually on May 24 and
November 24 of each year; and

     Whereas, the Borrower did not pay the interest due on May 24, 2001 and as a
result, the Lender and the Borrower entered into a Forbearance Agreement on
August 7, 2001, under which the May 24, 2001 interest due of $24,000 was added
to the principal amount of the loan, and said $24,000 was to be paid on or
before November 24, 2001; and

     Whereas, as of the date of this Amendment, the Borrower has not paid either
the $24,000 of interest originally due May 24, 2001 but by the Forbearance
Agreement deferred to November 24, 2001, or the $24,000 of interest due November
24, 2001;

     The  Lender and the Borrower agree:

     1.   The $48,000 of interest due to be paid by the Borrower to the Lender
          on or before November 24, 2001, is by this Amendment signed by
          Borrower and Lender, paid in full by the Borrower agreeing to issue
          309,677 shares of restricted common stock to the Lender, determined in
          the same manner as section 3 b of the Forbearance Agreement: A
          purchase price per share of $0.155, being 50% of the lowest trading
          price for the Borrower's common stock as published by Yahoo! Finance
          Historical Quote during the period from November 23, 2000 through
          Friday, December 31, 2001 ($0.31 x 50% = $0.155). The Borrower shall
          instruct its stock transfer agent to deliver the stock certificate for
          the shares to the Lender, in the name of the Lender or Tobian Trading,
          as requested by the Lender, as soon as possible.

     2.   Except as amended by section 1 above, the Forbearance Agreement, and
          the original Loan Agreement, remain in full force and effect.

     Signed in Las Vegas, Nevada.

     Can-Cal Resources Ltd.                     First Colony Merchant and
                                                Tobian Trading

       /s/  Barry E.  Amies                        /s/  John M.  Edwards
     --------------------------------           --------------------------------

     Barry M.  Amies, Vice President            John M.  Edwards, President
     --------------------------------           --------------------------------
     Print Name, Title and Date   Jan 29/02     Print Name, Title and Date



<PAGE>
#### Jake E. PARVIS, Appellant, v. CROSSROADS LOUNGE, INC., Appellee.

No. 70-562.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 6, 1971.

Norman. F. Solomon, Miami, for appellant.

Henry M. Cain, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the basis of the holding in Allegheny Mutual Casualty Company v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 362, 365.
<PAGE>


                                   Exhibit 4.4

Series 2002-1 Prospectus, dated January 7, 2002, and Prospectus Supplement,
dated January 9, 2002 (as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 10, 2002 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2) and incorporated herein by reference
thereto).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26091]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than October 16, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Arrendale Undiversified Family Limited Partnership, Baldwin, 
Georgia; its general partners, Thomas A. Arrendale, III, Gainsville, 
Georgia; Cynthia Bussey, Altanta, Georgia; and Thomas A. Arrendale, 
Jr., Clarkesville, Georgia; Thomas A. Arrendale, III, and Cynthia 
Bussey, in their individual capacities; to acquire voting shares of 
Habersham Bancorp, Cornelia, Georgia, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Habersham Bank, Clarkesville, Georgia.
    2. J. Alton Wingate, Cornelia, Georgia; to retain 31.17 percent of 
the voting shares of Community Bankshares, Inc., Cornelia, Georgia, and 
thereby indirectly retain Community Bank & Trust-Jackson, Commerce, 
Georgia; Community Bank & Trust-Troup, LaGrange, Georgia, and Community 
Bank & Trust-Alabama, Union Springs, Alabama.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 26, 
1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-26091 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
#### James Edward NAPIER, Sr., and Walter Bruce Gatewood v. Alwynn J. CRONVICH, Sheriff of Jefferson Parish and Warden of Jefferson Parish Prison.

No. 61245.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1978.

In re: James Edward Napier, Sr. and Walter Bruce Gatewood v. Alwynn J. Cronvich, Sheriff of Jeff. Parish and Warden of Jefferson Parish Prison, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Jefferson.

Writ granted. It is ordered that the trial judge appoint an attorney to assist relator in connection with preparation of his appeal.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25826]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA, Inc.; Special Committee 192; National Airspace Review 
Planning and Analysis

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for the 
Special Committee 192 meeting to be held October 15-16, 1997, starting 
at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at MITRE Corporation, 1820 Dolley 
Madison Boulevard, Westgate Building, McLean, VA 22102.
    The agenda will be as follows: (1) Chairman's Introductory Remarks; 
(2) Approval of Proposed Meeting Agenda; (3) Review and Approval of 
Summary of the Previous Meeting; (4) Information Briefings; (5) Report 
from Design and Infrastructure Work Group; (6) Report from Modeling and 
Measurement Work Group; (7) Other Business; (8) Set Agenda for Next 
Meeting; (9) Date and Place of Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web 
site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 24, 1997.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 97-25826 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### Harold Wayne JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40948.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 19, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 244 So.2d 142.

CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and Mc-CAIN, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., dissents.
#### HURRICANE BOATS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CERTIFIED INDUSTRIAL FABRICATORS, INC., a Division of Instruments Systems Corp., a New York corporation, Appellee.

Nos. 70-679, 70-717.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 30, 1971.

Weiner & Rubin, Miami, for appellant.

*175Feibelman, Friedman, Hyman & Britton and Alfred R. Camner, Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Hurricane Boats, Inc. has appealed from a summary final judgment and an amended summary final judgment in favor of the plaintiff below, ap-pellee. These appeals have been consolidated for all appellate purposes.

Plaintiff filed an unsworn complaint alleging money due and owing from the defendant for goods sold and delivered and on an account stated. The defendant’s unsworn answer denied each allegation of the complaint.

Plaintiff moved for summary judgment and attached an affidavit executed by its Vice President. The affidavit simply stated that affiant had read the attached complaint and that the allegations contained therein were true and correct to the best of his own personal knowledge and belief. The defendant filed its affidavit in opposition thereto and the trial court rendered summary final judgment for the plaintiff.

We reverse. Rule 1.510(e), R.C.P., 31 F.S.A., provides:

> “Supporting and opposing affidavits shall be made on personal knowledge, shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein.”

The affidavit in support of the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment does not show that it was made on personal knowledge, does not set forth such evi-dentiary facts as would be admissible in evidence, and does not affirmatively show that the affiant was competent to testify to the matters stated therein.

The burden is upon the moving party to demonstrate the non-existence of a genuine issue of material fact and there is no duty on the party moved against to demonstrate the existence of such issue until after the movant has satisfied his initial burden. See Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966, 191 So.2d 40; and Hix v. Sirkis, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 207. The affidavit in support of the summary judgment may not be based upon factual conclusions or conclusions of law. See O’Brian Associates of Orlando, Inc. v. Tully, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 202; First Mortgage Corporation of Stuart v. deGive, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 741; and Dean v. Gold Coast Theatres, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 546. In closing, we observe that defendant’s affidavit in opposition to the motion for summary judgment was also deficient under the rule.

The summary final judgment and the amended summary final judgment herein appealed be and they are hereby reversed and the cause be and the same is hereby remanded for further action consistent herewith.
#### APEX OIL COMPANY and Petroleum Fuel and Terminal Company v. CITY OF PORT ALLEN.

No. 62027.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 5, 1978.

In re: Apex Oil Co. & Petroleum Fuel & Terminal Co. and Greater Baton Rouge Port Commission applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal. First Circuit Parish of West Baton Rouge. 357 So.2d 624.

Writ denied.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 02-1114 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Joint Strike Fighter Program 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and AUSTRALIA Supplementing the 

Memorandum of Understanding of 

January 17, 2001 

Signed at Washington October 31, 2002 

 

with 

Annexes 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 AUSTRALIA 

Defense: Joint Strike Fighter Program 

 Agreement supplementing memorandum of 

 understanding of January 17, 2001. 

 Signed at Washington October 31, 2002; 

 Entered into force November 14, 2002. 

 With annexes.
#### Oscar ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-235.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 5, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Rina Bianco TULLI, Appellant, v. RIVIERA GROVES AND PACKING HOUSE, INC., a Florida *corporation, and*Jupiter Pure Oil, Inc., a Florida corporation, jointly and severally, Appellees.

No. 2436.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 12, 1969.

Frederick A. Hazouri and Larry Klein, of Cone, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, Mc-Keown & Dell, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

W. M. O’Bryan and Frank M. Hamilton of Fleming, O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Riviera Groves.

Earl L. Denney, Jr., and Thomas A. Hoadley of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery & D’Aiuto, West Palm Beach, for appellee Jupiter Pure Oil.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs in this cause and heard oral argument. Based thereon, it is our opinion that the appellant has not made reversible error *347appear. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., REED, J., and DRIVER, B. J., Associate Judge, concur.