alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Dennis R. Casey, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of RemoteDynamics, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: December 22, 2004      /s/ Dennis R. Casey  Dennis R. Casey, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
PROMISSORY NOTE

                                                Dated:       February 21, 2001

Principal Amount: $68,257.39                          State of Colorado

      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby jointly and severally promise
to pay to the order of Matrix Bancorp, Inc. the sum of sixty-eight thousand two
hundred fifty-seven and 39/100 dollars ($68,257.39), together with interest
thereon at the rate of Prime plus 1.5% per annum on the unpaid balance. Said sum
shall be paid in the manner following:

      All principal and interest shall be due on February 21, 2002.

      All payments shall be first applied to interest and the balance to
principal. This note may be prepaid, at any time, in whole or in part, without
penalty. All prepayments shall be applied in reverse order of maturity.

      This note shall at the option of any holder hereof be immediately due and
payable upon the failure to make any payment due hereunder within five (5) days
of its due date.

      This note at the option of any holder hereof may be extended on an annual
basis for increments of one (1) year. The terms and interest rate will remain
constant.

      In the event this note shall be in default, and placed with an attorney
for collection, then the undersigned agree to pay all reasonable attorney's fees
and costs of collection. Payments not made within five (5) days of due date
shall be subject to a late charge of 2% of said payment. All payments hereunder
shall be made to such address as may from time to time be designed by any holder
hereof.

      The undersigned and all other parties to this note, whether as endorsers,
guarantors or sureties, agree to remain fully bound hereunder until this note
shall be fully paid and waive demand, presentment and protest and all notices
thereto and further agree to remain bound, notwithstanding any extension,
renewal, modification, waiver, or other indulgence by any holder or upon the,
discharge or release of any obligor hereunder to this note, or upon the
exchange, substitution, or release of any collateral granted as security for
this note. No modification or indulgence by any holder hereof shall be binding
unless in writing; and any indulgence on any one occasion shall not be an
indulgence for any other or future occasion. Any modification or change of
terms, hereunder granted by any holder hereof, shall be valid and binding upon
each of the undersigned, notwithstanding the acknowledgment of any of the
undersigned, and each of the undersigned does hereby irrevocably grant to each
of the others a power of attorney to enter into any such modification on their
behalf. The rights of any holder hereof shall be cumulative and not necessarily
successive. This note shall take effect as sealed instrument and shall be
construed, governed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the state first
appearing at the head of this note. The undersigned hereby execute this note as
principals and not as sureties.
<PAGE>

Maker:

/s/ Thomas M. Piercy
Thomas M. Piercy
district court dismissed the petition without prejudice because the petition 

was not "brought to trial" within 5 years as required by NRCP 41(e). 

We conclude that the district court erred in dismissing 

appellant's petition pursuant to NRCP 41(e). There is no requirement 

under NRS Chapter 34 for a petitioner to take further action after the 

filing of the petition. Rather, NRS Chapter 34 places the obligation on the 

district court to take the next action. See, e.g., NRS 34.740 (requiring the 

clerk of the court to present the original petition promptly to a district 

judge); NRS 34.745(1) (requiring the district judge to determine whether 

an evidentiary hearing is required after reviewing the return, answer, and 

all supporting documents which are filed). 

We nevertheless affirm the dismissal of the petition because 

appellant failed to demonstrate a violation of due process in connection 

with the prison disciplinary hearing. See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298, 

468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (holding that a correct result will not be reversed 

simply because it is based on the wrong reason). In his petition, appellant 

claimed that the rule he violated did not specify •what constitutes 

prohibited or unauthorized use, his behavior did not constitute an offense, 

and the disciplinary hearing officer was biased because he was a personal 

friend of a correctional officer who was disciplined based on an 

investigation initiated by appellant. Appellant failed to demonstrate a 

violation of due process because he did not allege that he was deprived of 

advance written notice of the charges, a written statement of the evidence 

relied upon and the reasons for disciplinary action, or a qualified right to 

call witnesses and present evidence. Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 

563-69 (1974). The record indicates that some evidence supports the 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 
az---S761c 

Parraguirre 

decision by the prison disciplinary hearing officer, Superintendent u. Hill, 

472 U.S. 445, 455 (1985), and appellant failed to demonstrate that the 

hearing officer was not impartial. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

J. 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge 

Frank Milford Peck 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Carson City Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A aelp
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2784 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2784

   To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to 
adjust the boundary of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical 
                     Park, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2023

 Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Vance) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to 
adjust the boundary of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical 
                     Park, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK BOUNDARY 
              ADJUSTMENT.

    Section 101 of the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 
1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Boundary Adjustment.--In addition to the sites described in 
subsections (b) and (c), the boundary of the park is adjusted to 
include approximately 1 acre of land in Dayton, Ohio, depicted as 
`Proposed Addition' on the map entitled `Dayton Aviation Heritage 
National Historical Park Proposed Boundary Addition' and dated February 
2023.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Alfred J. MOLIN, Appellant, v. Aubrey ROGERS, Sheriff of Collier County, Florida and Joseph P. D’Alessandro, State Attorney, State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 77-437.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 2, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 29, 1977.

*738Lawrence D. Martin of Vega, Brown & Nichols, Naples, for appellant.

James H. Siesky, Naples, for appellee Rogers.

Louis St. Laurent, Chief Asst. State Atty., Anthony P. Pires, Jr., and Ronald C. Dillon, Asst. State Attys., Naples, for appel-lee D’Alessandro.

PER CURIAM.

Final judgment affirmed except for Point II, award of court costs, which is reversed the record reflecting no factual basis for which assessment was made.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and RYDER, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of United Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brenda M. Hudson-Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '1350, as adopted pursuant to '906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

/s/ Brenda M. Hudson-Nelson

 

Brenda M. Hudson-Nelson

Executive Vice President

Principal Financial Officer

December 23, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        500
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.5

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                CLICKACTION INC.

         CLICKACTION INC., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify:

         FIRST: The name of the Corporation is CLICKACTION INC.

         SECOND: The date on which the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation was originally filed with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware is May 3, 1995.

         THIRD: The Board of Directors of the Corporation, acting in accordance
with the provision of Sections 141 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware, adopted resolutions amending its Certificate of Incorporation
as follows:

         ARTICLE IV, Section A shall be amended and restated to read in its
entirety as follows:

                    A. This Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of
          stock to be designated, respectively, "Common Stock" and "Preferred
          Stock." The total number of shares which the corporation is authorized
          to issue is Sixty-Two Million (62,000,000) shares. Sixty Million
          (60,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, each having a par value of
          one-tenth of one cent ($.001). Two Million (2,000,000) shares shall be
          Preferred Stock, each having a par value of one- tenth of one cent
          ($.001).

         FOURTH: Thereafter pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors,
this Certificate of Amendment was submitted to the stockholders of the
Corporation for their approval, and was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

         FIFTH: All other provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation shall
remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CLICKACTION INC. has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to be signed by its President and Chief Executive Officer, Gregory W.
Slayton and attested to by its Secretary, Sharon Chiu, this 22 day of May, 2000.

                                  CLICKACTION INC.

                                  By: /s/  Gregory Slayton
                                      ----------------------------------
                                           Gregory Slayton
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

ATTEST:

/s/ Sharon Chiu
----------------------
Sharon Chiu
Secretary
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Magtron International Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Theodore S. Li, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Theodore S. Li 

Theodore S. LiChief Executive Officer and  Chief Financial Officer  November 16, 2004

  

A signed original of this written statement required  by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise  adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version  of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Pacific  Magtron International Corp. and will be retained by Pacific Magtron International  Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon  request. 

 

----
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Telecommunications Income Fund X (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
O. Brendengen, Chief Financial Officer of Berthel Fisher & Company Leasing,
Inc., General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Company's Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March 25, 2003                              /s/  Ronald O. Brendengen
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Ronald O. Brendengen
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 Berthel Fisher & Company
                                                 Leasing, Inc.
                                                 General Partner
                                                 Telecommunications Income Fund
                                                 X, L.P.
BERNARD C. MCGEE,

Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL D. CREWS, 

SECRETARY, FLORIDA 

DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-4688

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 23, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

James C. Hankinson, Judge.

Bernard C. McGee, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Therrien A. SEYMOUR, Appellant, v. Betty J. SEYMOUR, Appellee.

No. 70-985.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 23, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; John H. Moore, II, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51651-51652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26085]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-336-003]


Trailblazer Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

September 26, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 24, 1997, Trailblazer Pipeline 
Company (Trailblazer) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, certain tariff sheets to be 
effective June 1, 1997 and November 1, 1997.

[[Page 51652]]

    Trailblazer states that the purpose of the filing is to comply with 
Ordering Paragraph (A) of the Commission's order issued September 15, 
1997 in Docket Nos. RP97-336-001 and 002 (September 15th Order), which 
required Trailblazer to delete from its Tariff the sentence, ``If the 
rate will sometimes be less than but will never exceed the applicable 
maximum rate, such rate will be considered a discounted rate rather 
than a Negotiated Rate.'' Trailblazer states that in the present filing 
it has reflected this change to be effective June 1, 1997, as well as 
conforming changes to be effective November 1, 1997, to sheets approved 
by OPR letter order issued July 31, 1997 in Docket No. RP97-54-006 
(July 31st Letter Order).
    Trailblazer requests waiver of the Commission's Regulations to the 
extent necessary to permit the tendered tariff sheets to become 
effective as indicated in the present filing consistent with the 
September 15th Order and the July 31st Letter Order.
    Trailblazer states that copies of the filing have been mailed to 
its transportation customers, interested state regulatory agencies, and 
all parties set out on the official service lists in Docket No. RP97-
336.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a motion 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must 
be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26085 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# :'A,~-20iO-I\iD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAAhasthis proposal been discussed?

Organization Natii)ll~l Bll~il1e.ss Airrrarl ,,"~SJ)d'l(i'oll



# ... 'I Regional Airlilll' AS'!:tlr.:illlioll Aircraft OWllers & Pilots Association ATA 

### Person Contacted Eli coIn Dave LoltCrt'r Rubert J-1ackm;11l Craig F:lbiall 

### Date Response



# -