alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 185 (Wednesday, September 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25349]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33461]


Southern Pacific Transportation Co.--Trackage Rights Exemption--
The Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co.

    The Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Company (HB&T) has agreed to 
grant overhead and local trackage rights to Southern Pacific 
Transportation Company (SP) over HB&T's tracks in Houston, Harris 
County, TX. The overhead trackage rights are described as follows: (1) 
The West Belt Subdivision between milepost 0.0 and milepost 11.1; (2) 
the East Belt Subdivision between milepost 0.0 and milepost 14.3; and 
(3) the Columbia Tap from SP milepost 9.2 to the end of the line. The 
local trackage rights are described as follows: (1) The West Belt 
Subdivision between 0.00 and connection at milepost 7.2; (2) the East 
Belt Subdivision between Belt Junction, at milepost 3.4, and GH&H 
connection, at milepost 12.5; and (3) the Columbia Tap near Pierce 
Junction, at SP milepost 9.2, to the end of the line.
    The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on or after October 
6, 1997.
    The purpose of the overhead trackage rights is to permit SP to 
operate over HB&T's trackage in Houston. The purpose of the local 
trackage rights is to permit SP to provide service directly to shippers 
on HB&T's tracks in the City of Houston.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33461, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Joseph D. Anthofer, Esq., 1416 Dodge Street, #830, Omaha, NE 
68179.

    Decided: September 15, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25349 Filed 9-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

1 JOHN E. FELGAR, 1 

Petitioner, 

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF 

PROBATION AND PAROLE, 

I Respondent. 

Civil Action NO. 04-1 96 Erie 

MEMORANDUM ORDER 

This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on July 

1 14, 2004 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter 

for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(I), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on January 

6, 2006, recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed as moot 

and that a certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days 

from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified 

mail at his address of record and on Respondent. Objections were filed by Petitioner 

on January 24, 2006. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, 

together with the Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following 

order is entered: 

AND NOW, this 3Ith Day of January, 2006, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is 

DISMISSED as moot and that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, dated 

January 6, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. 

IS Sean J. McLaughlin United States District Judge 

cm: All parties of record. 

Susan Paradise Baxter 

U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:04-cv-00196-SJM-SPB Document 43 Filed 01/31/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25553]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4250-000]


Illinois Power Company; Notice of Filing

September 22, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 15, 1997, Illinois Power Company 
(Illinois Power) tendered for filing firm transmission agreements under 
which Granite City Steel, Division of National Steel Corporation will 
take transmission service pursuant to its open access transmission 
tariff. The agreements are based on the Form of Service Agreement in 
Illinois Power's tariff.
    Illinois Power has requested an effective date of August 1, 1997.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before September 30, 1997. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25553 Filed 9-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MICHAEL NELSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

MARISSA REDICK, 

 Defendant. 

 No. 4:23-CV-00945 

 (Chief Judge Brann) 

ORDER

AND NOW, this 5th day of January 2024, in accordance with the 

accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff’s amended complaint (Doc. 10) is DISMISSED with 

prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a 

claim upon which relief may be granted. 

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

 Matthew W. Brann 

 Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:23-cv-00945-MWB-MP Document 13 Filed 01/05/24 Page 1 of 1
1 

### Chappell, Regina

From: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 4:00 PM

To: Sasser, Erika

Cc: Frey, Nathan J.; Chappell, Regina; Wesson, Karen; Weatherhead, Darryl; Langdon, Robin;

Stone, Susan; Shepherd, Eloise; Corrales, Mark

Subject: RE: Response to Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: Review of National

Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone (RIN 2060-AP38)

Erika,

I have opened ROCIS up for amendment and EPA can upload a clean version of the preamble/rule and RIA into

ROCIS. Please send me an email when it has been uploaded. Thank you very much and please let me know if you have

any comments or questions.

From: Sasser, Erika [mailto:Sasser.Erika@epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 3:51 PM

To: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>; Chappell, Regina <Chappell.Regina@epa.gov>; Wesson, Karen

<Wesson.Karen@epa.gov>; Weatherhead, Darryl <Weatherhead.Darryl@epa.gov>; Langdon, Robin

<Langdon.Robin@epa.gov>; Stone, Susan <Stone.Susan@epa.gov>; Shepherd, Eloise <Shepherd.Eloise@epa.gov>;

Corrales, Mark <Corrales.Mark@epa.gov>

Subject: Response to Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: Review of National Ambient Air Quality

Standards for Ozone (RIN 2060

‐ AP38)

Aaron,

We have made these changes in the preamble and RIA as requested by the interagency reviewers. Let me know if there

is anything further.

Thanks,

Erika

From: Szabo, Aaron [ mailto:Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 2:24 PM

To: Sasser, Erika

Cc: Frey, Nathan J.; Chappell, Regina; Wesson, Karen; Weatherhead, Darryl; Langdon, Robin; Stone, Susan; Shepherd,

Eloise

Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: Review of National Ambient Air Quality

Standards for Ozone (RIN 2060

‐ AP38)

Attached and below please find the summary of interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 on the draft final

rule and Regulatory Impact Analysis for the EPA draft final rule entitled, Review of National Ambient Air Quality

Standards for Ozone

.

Draft final rule preamble:

Reviewer recommends revising the language on page 276

‐ 7 of the clean version to state the following:2 This level is below the lowest concentration (i.e., 60 ppb) that has been shown in controlled human exposure studies of

healthy adults to cause moderate lung function decrements (i.e., FEV 1 decrements ≥ 10%, which could be adverse to

people with lung disease), large lung function decrements (i.e., FEV 1 decrements ≥ 20%) in a small proportion of people,

and airway inflammation

, notwithstanding the Administrator’s judgment that there is uncertainty in the adversity of

the effects shown to occur at 60 ppb

.

Thank you and please let me know if you have any comments or questions.

Aaron L. Szabo

Policy Analyst

Office of Management and Budget

202

‐ 395

‐ 3621

Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
#### Otha FAVORS and Sharon Clinkenbeard Favors, Appellants, v. CITY OF TAMPA, Appellee.

No. 70-416.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 31, 1971.

Delano S. Stewart, Tampa, for appellants.

Wm. Reece Smith, Jr., City Atty., and Gerald H. Bee, Asst. City Atty., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was improvidently taken from Hillsborough County Circuit Court granting a motion to dismiss an appeal taken by Otha Favors and Sharon Clinkenbeard Favors from their convictions in municipal court. This court, pursuant to Section 59.45, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which is applicable to District Courts of Appeal of Florida,1 regards the *173notice of appeal and the record herein as a petition for certiorari duly presented to this court.

Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss was granted since the record-on-appeal was not timely filed with the Circuit Court as per Section 932.52(11) (15), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. and Florida Appellate Rule 3.6, 32 F.S.A. However, we find that the real fault lies with the municipal court clerk since he failed to transmit the record-on-appeal as required by Section 932.52 (10), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. once petitioners, appellants below, had complied with the provisions of Section 932.52(3), Florida Statutes, F.S.A. in perfecting their appeal.

The writ is granted and the Order of Dismissal is quashed. This cause is therefore remanded for further consideration.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.

1

. Ludwig v. Cochran, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 484.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RUSSELL CARL DEATER, :

:

Petitioner :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:14-CV-628

:

SUPERINTENDENT LAMAS, : (Judge Brann)

:

Respondent :

ORDER

April 22, 2015

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1. Deater’s habeas corpus petition is DISMISSED as untimely. 

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

3. Based on the Court’s conclusion herein, there is no basis for

the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

1

Case 4:14-cv-00628-MWB-JVW Document 12 Filed 04/22/15 Page 1 of 1
#### David L. THOMAS, etc., et al., Appellants, v. E. A. KOVACH, M.D., et al., Appellees.

No. 70-453.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Edward PARR. STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Edward E. PARR v. Ross MAGGIO, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

Nos. 61258 and 61098.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1978.

Thomas J. Ford, Jr., Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant in No. 61258.

Edward Parr, defendant-relator in No. 61098 in pro. per.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Henry P. Julien, Jr., Asst. *557Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee in No. 61258 and for plaintiff-respondent in No. 61098.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Writ denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2582]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[NM-070-1610-00]

Change of Mailing Address; New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the new mailing address of the Bureau 
of Land Management, Farmington District Office, Farmington New Mexico 
AND the new mailing address and physical location of the Farmington 
Indian Minerals Office (FIMO).

DATES: February 3, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary McCloskey, Administrative 
Officer, Bureau of Land Management, Farmington District Office, 505-
599-8920.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Interior's Bureau of Land 
Management, New Mexico State, Farmington District Office is changing 
their mailing address effective February 3, 1997. The new mailing 
address will be: Bureau of Land Management, Farmington District Office, 
1235 La Plata Highway, Suite A, Farmington, New Mexico 87401.
    The Department of Interior's Farmington Indian Minerals Office 
(FIMO) is changing their mailing address and physical location. The new 
mailing address and physical location will be. Farmington Indian 
Minerals Office (FIMO), 1235 La Plata Highway, Suite B, Farmington, New 
Mexico 87401.

    Dated: January 28, 1997.
Joel E. Farrell,
Acting District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-2582 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
```
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-QSB

[X] Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
    of 1934

For the Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2002

                                       or

[ ] Transitional report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act

                          Commission File No. 000-26647

                                 Voyer One, Inc.
                                 ---------------
                 (Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)

         Delaware                                      13-4031425
------------------------------            -------------------------------------
State or other jurisdiction of            I.R.S. Employer Identification Number
incorporation or organization

            317 Madison Avenue, Suite 2310, New York, New York 10017
            --------------------------------------------------------
                     (Address of principal executive office)

Issuer's telephone number:  (212) 949-9696
                            --------------

Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) been
subject to such filing requirements for the past ninety (90) days.

Yes     X       No
    ----------     -----------

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common
equity, as of the latest practical date: As of November 12, 2002, there were
2,545,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, outstanding

Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):
Yes             No     X
    ----------     -----------


         Voyer One, Inc. files this amendment to its quarterly report on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 to include as an
exhibit the Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
#### A. Bernard OLSEN, Appellant, v. John STETSON, Appellee.

No. 69-291.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

June 19, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Knott, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          23,573
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,573
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,573
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,701
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,170
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,702
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,573
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,733)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,733)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,733)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,733)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.003)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2189 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2189

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain fungicides containing zinc 
                        dimethyldithiocarbamate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 2006

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain fungicides containing zinc 
                        dimethyldithiocarbamate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FUNGICIDE CONTAINING ZINC DIMETHYLDITHIOCARBAMATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.38.08      Fungicides          Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         containing zinc                                                    31/2008
                         dimethyldithiocar
                         bamate (CAS No.
                         137-30-4)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3808.20.28)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHumidity effects on adhesion of nickel-zinc ferrite in elastic contact with magnetic tape and itselfThe effects of humidity on the adhesion of Ni-Zn ferrite and magnetic tape in elastic contact with a Ni-Zn ferrite hemispherical pin in moist nitrogen were studied. Adhesion was independent of normal load in dry, humid, and saturated nitrogen. Ferrites adhere to ferrites in a saturated atmosphere primarily from the surface tension effects of a thin film of water adsorbed on the ferrite surfaces. The surface tension of the water film calculated from the adhesion results was 48 times 0.00001 to 56 times 0.00001 N/cm; the accepted value for water is 72.7 x 0.00001 N/cm. The adhesion of ferrite-ferrite contacts increased gradually with increases in relative humidity to 80 percent, but rose rapidly above 80 percent. The adhesion at saturation was 30 times or more greater than that below 80 percent relative humidity. Although the adhesion of magnetic tape - ferrite contacts remained low below 40 percent relative humidity and the effect of humidity was small, the adhesion increased considerably with increasing relative humidity above 40 percent. The changes in adhesion of elastic contacts were reversible on humidifying and dehumidifying.Document ID19850013049Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsMiyoshi, K.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Buckley, D. H.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Kusaka, T.*(Osaka Inst. of Technology)*Maeda, C.*(Osaka Inst. of Technology)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1985Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2449E-2361NASA-TP-2449Accession Number85N21359Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-53-1BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850013049.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 17

- 00372

- CV

In the Interest of B.S., a Child §

§

§

§ From the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323

- 104564

- 17)

February 15 , 2018

Opinion by Justice Meier



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill M eier