alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Ground-water resources of the Lowell area, Massachusetts

By: John Augustus Baker

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1669Y

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No. 00-594.

#### Waymire *v.*Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the following RegistrationStatements:

|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-129746, No. 333-98738, No. 333-39407, No.333-38730 and No. 333-67050) pertaining to the Vion Pharmaceuticals,Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, the Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2003Stock Option Plan, the Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Amended and Restated1993 Stock Option Plan, as amended and in the Registration Statement(Form S-8 No. 333-53772) pertaining to the Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                                          |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.333-37941, No. 333-61477, No. 333-79939, No. 333-95671 and No.333-58206) of Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the relatedProspectus; |

of our reports dated March 8,2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of VionPharmaceuticals, Inc., Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’smanagement’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting of Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., included inthis Form 10-K for the year ended December  31,  2005.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

March13,  2006

----
#### Willie Edward SIMS, Jr., a/k/a Willie Edward Simms, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-563.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 13, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 5, 1970.

Calvin R. Mapp, of Matthews, Braynon & Mapp, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and J. Terrell Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no harmful error has been *159demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN, and OWEN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24996]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA, Inc. Joint Special Committee 190/EUROCAE Working Group 52

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for 
Joint Special Committee 190/EUROCAE Working Group (WG) 52 meeting to be 
held October 7-10, 1997, starting at 8:00 a.m. The meeting will be held 
at EUROCAE, 17 Rue Hamelin, Paris.
    The agenda will include the following: Tuesday, October 7: 8:00 
a.m.-5:00 p.m. (1) Registration (8:00-8:30 a.m.); (2) Chairman's 
Opening Remarks and General Introductions; (3) Review and Approval of 
Summary of the Previous Meeting; (4) Non-airborne Software Discussions; 
(5) CAA/NATS; (6) Non-airborne Scope Expansion; (7) Progress Since Last 
Meeting (Executive Committee). Wednesday, October 8: 8:00 a.m.-3:30 
p.m. (8) Issue Team Breakout Sessions; 3:30 p.m.-5:00 p.m. (9) Plenary 
Session Decisions (Executive Committee). Thursday, October 9: 8:00 
a.m.-3:30 p.m. (10) Issue Team Breakout Sessions; 3:30-5:00 p.m. (11) 
Plenary Session Decisions (Executive Committee). Friday, October 10: 
8:00 a.m.-12:00 noon (12) COTS Report; (13) Service History Report; 
(14) Structural Coverage Report; (15) Plenary Approvals; (16) 
Expectations and Plans for Next Meeting; (17) Meeting Review.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web 
site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 12, 1997.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 97-24996 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
### Geology and ground-water appraisal of the Naval Air Missile Test Center area, Point Mugu, California

By: R. W. Page

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1619S

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Klimovige *v.*Hazle Brook Coal Co., Appellant.

Argued December 12, 1933.

Be*400fore Trexler,' P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*402P. *B. Roads,*for appellant.

*Roger J. Dever,*for appellee.

February 1, 1934:

Per Curiam,

The judgment is affirmed upon the opinion of the lower court.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1554

LANCE E. RUCK; ROBERT A. CUSHING, JR., Creditors - Appellants, and KENNETH R. SMOOT, Creditor, versus LYNN LEWIS TAVENNER, Trustee, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:05-cv-00482-JRS; BK-98-39531-DOT) Submitted: July 26, 2006 Decided: August 10, 2006 Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lance E. Ruck, Robert A. Cushing, Jr., Appellants Pro Se. Christopher Abram Jones, LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Lance E. Ruck and Robert A. Cushing, Jr., seek to appeal the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying their motion for payment of administrative expenses. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on March 30, 2006. The notice of appeal was filed on May 4, 2006. Because Ruck and Cushing failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Albert CORLEY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-119.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 6, 1971.

Albert Corley, Jr., in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
#### Cornelius COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-532.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 10, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
#### HARRIS MIAMI BEACH CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Harry M. SUSKIN, Appellee.

No. 69-98.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 16, 1969.

Litman & Muchnick, Hollywood, for appellant.

Talianoff *&*Waller, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Wiggins v. Wilson, 55 Fla. 346, 45 So. 1011; O’Bryan v. Linton, Fla.1949, 41 So.2d 169; Lindquist v. Burklew, Fla.App.1960, 123 So.2d 261; Lewis v. State, Fla.App.1966, 181 So.2d 744. Also see: Buckalew v. Buckalew, Fla.App.1959, 115 So.2d 564; Althouse v. State Farm Fire *&*Casualty Company, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 859.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2818 

To amend the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, to make unlawful 

acquisitions that would create monopolies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. HAWLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, to make 

unlawful acquisitions that would create monopolies, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening Anti5 trust Enforcement for Meatpacking Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES UNDER PACKERS AND 

7 STOCKYARDS ACT, 1921. 

8 Section 202 of the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921 

9 (7 U.S.C. 192), is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2818 IS

1 (1) in each of subsections (a) through (f), by 

2 striking ‘‘; or’’ at the end and inserting a period; 

3 (2) in subsection (e) (as amended by paragraph 

4 (1)), by inserting ‘‘, in accordance with subsection 

5 (b)’’ before the period at the end; 

6 (3) in subsection (f)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘(1)’’; 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘or (2)’’; and 

9 (C) by striking ‘‘(3)’’; 

10 (4) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘made unlaw11 ful by subdivision (a), (b), (c), (d), or (e)’’ and in12 serting ‘‘described in paragraphs (1) through (5)’’; 

13 (5) by redesignating subsections (a) through (g) 

14 as paragraphs (1) through (7), respectively, and in15 denting appropriately; 

16 (6) by striking the section designation and all 

17 that follows through ‘‘It shall be unlawful’’ in the 

18 matter preceding paragraph (1) (as so redesignated) 

19 and inserting the following: 

20 ‘‘SEC. 202. UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES. 

21 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful’’; 

22 (7) in subsection (a) (as so designated), in the 

23 matter preceding paragraph (1) (as so redesignated), 

24 by striking ‘‘to:’’ and inserting ‘‘to carry out the fol25 lowing activities:’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 2818 IS

1 (8) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(b) ACQUISITION CREATING A MONOPOLY.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of subsection 

4 (a)(5), an acquisition shall be deemed to create a 

5 monopoly if the acquisition would— 

6 ‘‘(A) result in a Herfindahl-Hirschman 

7 Index greater than 1,800 in any relevant mar8 ket; or 

9 ‘‘(B) increase the Herfindahl-Hirschman 

10 Index by more than 100 in any relevant mar11 ket. 

12 ‘‘(2) CLAYTON ACT VIOLATION.—Any acquisi13 tion deemed to create a monopoly under paragraph 

14 (1) shall be considered a violation of section 7 of the 

15 Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 18).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANTHONY MICHAEL CASTELLO, : CIVIL NO. 4:24-CV-1032

: 

 Plaintiff, : 

 : 

 v. : 

 : (Magistrate Judge Carlson)

TYLER ARBOGAST, et al., : 

 : 

 Defendants. : 

ORDER

AND NOW this 2nd day of December 2024, in accordance with the 

accompanying Memorandum Opinion IT IS ORDERED that the defendants’ motion 

to dismiss, (Doc. 21), is GRANTED as follows:

The institutional defendants, the Pennsylvania State Police, and State Police 

Troop F command center are DISMISSED.

The official capacity individual defendant damages claims are DISMISSED.

The malicious prosecution, false arrest and false imprisonment claims against 

all defendants are DISMISSED.

The case will proceed forward on the Fourth Amendment excessive force claim 

brought against Defendants Arbogast, Horan, and Bowers in their individual

capacities, and the following case management schedule will govern this case:

Case 4:24-cv-01032-MCC Document 34 Filed 12/02/24 Page 1 of 3
2 

1. COUNSEL AND PRO SE LITIGANTS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR 

READING THIS ENTIRE ORDER.

2. Schedule. The following deadlines, described in greater detail throughout 

this order, have been established for this case, and may not be modified by the parties. 

Motions to modify or extend the deadlines established here shall be made before 

expiration of the time limits has passed. All requests for extensions of discovery 

deadlines must be made at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the 

discovery period. Motions will be granted only on a showing of good cause. 

Close of Discovery: March 24, 2025

Dispositive Motions and Supporting Briefs Due: March 24, 2025

Further deadlines will be set following the resolution of any dispositive 

motions. 

3. Discovery Limitations. In the absence of mutual consent to exceed these 

limits or a court order, the maximum number of interrogatories per side shall be 

twenty-five (25); the maximum number of document production requests per side 

shall be twenty-five (25); and the maximum number of requests for admissions per 

side shall be twenty-five (25). 

4. Dispositive Motions. Dispositive motions may be filed at any time, but all 

dispositive motion must be filed, as well as the supporting briefs, on or before March 

Case 4:24-cv-01032-MCC Document 34 Filed 12/02/24 Page 2 of 3
3 

24, 2025.

Any requests to alter this schedule should be made by written motion.

S/ Martin C. Carlson 

 Martin C. Carlson 

 United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:24-cv-01032-MCC Document 34 Filed 12/02/24 Page 3 of 3
### Floods of August 1940 in the Southeastern States

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1066

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 16, 2013

NO. 03-13-00010-CV

Christopher Rogers, Appellant

v.

Amy Rogers, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

IT APPEARING to this Court that the appellant has neither paid, nor made arrangements to pay 

for the clerk’s record; has not submitted a status report regarding this appeal, and, accordingly, 

has failed to prosecute the appeal: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that 

the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. IT IS FURTHER ordered that the appellant 

pay all costs relating to this appeal both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision 

be certified below for observance.
Order entered December 13, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00739-CV

GALLERIA MALL INVESTORS LP, Appellant

V.

GT DALLAS PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-05581

ORDER

This appeal was abated to allow the parties an opportunity to settle their disputes. By 

motion dated November 27, 2013, appellant informed us the parties have settled, requested the 

appeal be reinstated, and requested the case be dismissed in accordance with the parties’ 

agreement. Accordingly, we REINSTATE the appeal. The case will be disposed of by separate 

opinion and judgment. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

 

 

I, Gunther Than, President and Treasurer of View Systems, Inc. (the “Corporation”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:

 

1.      the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

 

|                              |                        |                                                                                                                                      |        |
|------------------------------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |                   |                                                                                                                                 |   |
|                         | **View Systems, Inc.** |                                                                                                                                 |
|                         |                   |                                                                                                                                 |   |
| Date: December 16, 2009 | By:                    | /s/ Gunther Than                                                                                                                |   |
|                         |                   | Gunther Than                                                                                                                         |   |
|                         |                   | President and Treasurer

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|                         |                   |                                                                                                                                 |   |