alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          13,658
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  324,448
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    365,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               770,476
<PP&E>                                         170,917
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,073,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          681,505
<BONDS>                                        497,077
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,291,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,073,230
<SALES>                                      1,229,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,229,003
<CGS>                                          678,019
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  678,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               392,691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                188,925
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,138
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            186,164
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   186,164
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25114]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Regular Meeting; Sunshine Act 
Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), that the October 9, 1997 regular 
meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board) will not be 
held. The FCA Board will hold a meeting at 9:00 a.m. on Wednesday, 
October 22, 1997. An agenda for this meeting will be published at a 
later date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Floyd Fithian, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4025, TDD (703) 883-4444.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

    Dated: September 16, 1997.
Floyd Fithian,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 97-25114 Filed 9-17-97; 2:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
#### Willie BRYANT, Appellant, v. Evans SMALL, Appellee.

No. 70-203.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 9, 1970.

Alfred D. Bieley, Miami, for appellant.

August, Nimkoff & Gladstone, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an adverse summary judgment dismissing a complaint seeking rescission of a deed, allegedly executed as a result of fraud and undue influence practiced by the appellee upon the grantor. We reverse.

Ordinarily, fraud and undue influence cases are not the proper subject of summary judgment. As to fraud, see: Alepgo Corporation v. Pozin, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 645; Dean v. Gold Coast Theatres, Inc. Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 546. *151As to undue influence, see: In Re Knight’s Estate, Fla.App.1959, 108 So.2d 629. This is not to say that there may not be unusual circumstances which will permit a summary judgment in a fraud or undue influence case, but the record in the instant appeal does not present such a unique situation and the plaintiff in the trial court should have been entitled to a full evidentiary hearing.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEFFREY VAN KUREN, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 04-1 Erie

v. )

)

UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on January 5,

2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 7], filed on

August 25, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be dismissed as moot. The

parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service

was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondent. No objections were filed. 

After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the

Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DISMISSED as moot. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 7] of Magistrate Judge Lenihan,

filed on August 25, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Lisa Pupo Lenihan, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:04-cv-00001-SJM-LPL Document 8 Filed 09/13/06 Page 1 of 1
#### In re James Willie COCHRAN v. STATE of Alabama. Ex parte James Willie Cochran.

SC 2533.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 12, 1977.

J. Wilson Dinsmore, Birmingham, for petitioner.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., Montgomery, Barry V. Hutner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Birmingham, opposed.

*1083EMBRY, Justice.

The ground assigned by petitioner on the basis of which he asks this court to issue the writ of certiorari is that the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals is in conflict with the decision of this court in *Williams v. State,*291 Ala. 213, 279 So.2d 478 (1973). Petitioner states that the holding of the appeals court that:

> “ ‘The appellant contends that the trial judge erred in admitting hearsay testimony by Fairfield Police Officer Fred Smith by allowing him over objection to testify as to the Georgia license tag number given to him by Mr. Hollifield, and that such was not connected up by Mr. Hollifield’s testimony.

> “ ‘We are of the opinion that the trial judge properly admitted this testimony in rebuttal by the State as being a part of the official investigation of the officers in question.

> “ ‘Such information pertaining to the Georgia tag number sheds light on the main fact of the robbery and was therefore properly admitted by the trial judge.’ ”

conflicts with the holding in *Williams*that:

> “ ‘For a statement to be admissible as part of the res gestae exception to the hearsay rule, it must be incident to what was done, as shedding light on the main fact. .

> “ ‘. . . . The statement in this case required no particular reflection or thought.’ ”

The appeals court reached the correct result in this case but gave the wrong reason for the admissibility of the testimony of Officer Fred Smith. The testimony was not admissible because the information was gained from an official investigation but because it was admissible to prove the *fact*of a report to the police, rather than the truth of the contents of such report, to corroborate the testimony of the witness who gave the report to the police, who later identified the vehicle, and thus was in rebuttal of petitioner’s case. See McElroy’s Alabama Evidence, 3d Ed., § 273.01, p. 610.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, MADDOX, FAULKNER and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

JONES and ALMON, JJ., would grant the writ, therefore dissent.
# Amtsblatt C 140I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 140I |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 64. Jahrgang21. April 2021 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 140I

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

64. Jahrgang21. April 2021

---

| Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- |
| | Berichtigungen |
| | Berichtigung zu: Europäische Agentur für Sicherheit und Gesundheitsschutz am Arbeitsplatz (EU-OSHA), Bilbao — Ausschreibung der Stelle des Exekutivdirektors (m/w) (Bedienstete/-r auf Zeit — Besoldungsgruppe AD 14) — COM/2020/20049 ( ABl. C 171 A vom 19.5.2020 ) | 1 |

Inhalt

Seite

Berichtigungen

Berichtigung zu: Europäische Agentur für Sicherheit und Gesundheitsschutz am Arbeitsplatz (EU-OSHA), Bilbao — Ausschreibung der Stelle des Exekutivdirektors (m/w) (Bedienstete/-r auf Zeit — Besoldungsgruppe AD 14) — COM/2020/20049 ( ABl. C 171 A vom 19.5.2020 )

( ABl. C 171 A vom 19.5.2020 )

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

Berichtigungen

| 21.4.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CI 140/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CI 140/1

---

Berichtigung zu: Europäische Agentur für Sicherheit und Gesundheitsschutz am Arbeitsplatz (EU-OSHA), Bilbao — Ausschreibung der Stelle des Exekutivdirektors (m/w) (Bedienstete/-r auf Zeit — Besoldungsgruppe AD 14) — COM/2020/20049

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 171 A vom 19. Mai 2020
  )

(2021/C 140 I/01)

Auf Seite 4, sechster Absatz:

Anstatt:

„Bevor der Verwaltungsrat einen oder eine der in der Auswahlliste geführte/-n Bewerber/-in ernennt, werden Letztere aufgefordert, sich den zuständigen Gremien des Rates und des Ausschusses des Europäischen Parlaments vorzustellen und Fragen zu beantworten. Das Europäische Parlament und der Rat der Europäischen Union geben daraufhin ihre Stellungnahme ab und legen ihre gewünschte Reihenfolge der Bewerber/-innen fest; Der Verwaltungsrat ernennt den Exekutivdirektor/die Exekutivdirektorin unter Berücksichtigung dieser Stellungnahmen.“

muss es heißen:

„Der ausgewählte Bewerber wird aufgefordert, vor dem Europäischen Parlament eine Erklärung abzugeben und Fragen der Mitglieder des Parlaments zu beantworten.“

---
No. 00-643.

#### Green et al. v. City of Plano et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GenTek Inc. (the Company) for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), William E. Redmond, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas B. Testa, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ | William E. Redmond, Jr.
|--- | -----------------------
|    | William E. Redmond, Jr.
|    | Chief Executive Officer
|    | August 29, 2007        
|   
|   
|/s/ | Thomas B. Testa        
|    | Thomas B. Testa        
|    | Chief Financial Officer
|    | August 29, 2007        

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GenTek Inc. and will be retained by GenTek Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### Shirley Jane HOOD, Appellant, v. Lex Y. HOOD, Appellee.

No. N-452.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 15, 1971.

Rehearing Denied May 14, 1971.

Dawson, Galant, Maddox, Boyer, Sulik & Nichols, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Knight, Kincaid, Poucher & Harris, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record on appeal have been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower Court is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., RAWLS, J., and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge, concur.
Case 4:06-cv-01665-JFM Document 11 Filed 10/20/06 Page 1 of 6
Case 4:06-cv-01665-JFM Document 11 Filed 10/20/06 Page 2 of 6
Case 4:06-cv-01665-JFM Document 11 Filed 10/20/06 Page 3 of 6
Case 4:06-cv-01665-JFM Document 11 Filed 10/20/06 Page 4 of 6
Case 4:06-cv-01665-JFM Document 11 Filed 10/20/06 Page 5 of 6
Case 4:06-cv-01665-JFM Document 11 Filed 10/20/06 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 31.2**CFO CERTIFICATION**     I, Jian Liu, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sun Oil & Gas Corp.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 

 
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   December 2, 2005 /s/ Jian Liu     Jian Liu  Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer)
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2783 

AN ACT 

To amend the Miccosukee Reserved Area Act to authorize 

the expansion of the Miccosukee Reserved Area and to 

carry out activities to protect structures within the Osceola Camp from flooding, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2783 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Miccosukee Reserved 

3 Area Amendments Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MICCOSUKEE RESERVED AREA ADDITION. 

5 Section 4(4) of the Miccosukee Reserved Area Act 

6 (16 U.S.C. 410 note; Public Law 105–313) is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(C) ADDITIONAL AREA.—In addition to 

9 the land described in subparagraph (B), the 

10 term ‘Miccosukee Reserved Area’ or ‘MRA’ in11 cludes the portion of the Park that is known as 

12 ‘Osceola Camp’ and is depicted on the map en13 titled ‘Everglades National Park, Proposed Ex14 pansion–Miccosukee Reserved Area, Osceola 

15 Camp’, numbered 160/188443, and dated July 

16 2023, copies of which shall— 

17 ‘‘(i) be kept available for public in18 spection in the offices of the National Park 

19 Service; and 

20 ‘‘(ii) be filed with appropriate officers 

21 of Miami-Dade County and the Tribe.’’. 

22 SEC. 3. PROTECTION OF THE OSCEOLA CAMP FROM 

23 FLOODING. 

24 Section 8 of the Miccosukee Reserved Area Act (16 

25 U.S.C. 410 note; Public Law 105–313) is amended by 

26 adding at the end the following: 
3 

†S 2783 ES

1 ‘‘(j) PROTECTION OF OSCEOLA CAMP FROM FLOOD2 ING.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 2 years 

4 after the date of enactment of this subsection, the 

5 Secretary, in consultation with the Tribe, shall take 

6 appropriate actions to protect structures within the 

7 area described in section 4(4)(C) from flooding. 

8 ‘‘(2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

9 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec10 retary such sums as are necessary to carry out para11 graph (1) for fiscal year 2024 and each fiscal year 

12 thereafter, but not more than a total $14,000,000.’’. 

Passed the Senate December 12, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2783 

AN ACT 

To amend the Miccosukee Reserved Area Act to auand for other purposes. tures within the Osceola Camp from flooding, Area and to carry out activities to protect struc- thorize the expansion of the Miccosukee Reserved
**Exhibit
      32**


**Herborium
      Group, Inc.**


**Certification
      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Herborium Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Agnes Olszewski,
      Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





*Date:*July 14, 2008*/s/Agnes
                Olszewski**Agnes
                Olszewski**Chief
                Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
                and**Chief
                Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
                Officer)*





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-40316

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN JOSE CABRERA, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:11-CR-1108-1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Juan Jose Cabrera,

Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cabrera has not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 27, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-40316 Document: 00512064058 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/27/2012
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-95316, 33-95314, 333-35683 and 333-47275) pertaining to stock
option plans of Teltrend Inc. of our report dated August 28, 1998, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Teltrend Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10K/A) for the year ended July 25, 1998.



                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Chicago, Illinois
July 29, 1999
#### Joseph W. MEINSEN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40474.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 17, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 240 So.2d 188.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 1 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 2 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 3 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 4 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 5 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 6 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 7 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 8 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 9 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 10 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 11 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 12 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 13 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 14 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 15 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 16 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 17 of 18Case 1:02-cr-00015-MBC Document 558 Filed 01/29/07 Page 18 of 18