### Letter

**– Request to Use CARES for Larger/Older Persons:** 

**Request to Use CARES for Larger/Older Persons**
I am writing to request an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent required for Ry an Guerrero to be able to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint Sy stem even though he exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. In addition, if m y petition is granted, I request that an y air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Ryan Guerrero is ab oard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Ryan Guerrero to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA

- approved child restraint sy stem during use of that child restraint sy stem aboard an aircraft. I believe the pertinent section from 14 CFR part 121 from which we seek relief is Section 121.311 Seats, safet y belts, and shoulder harnesses. My son is 13 year’s old, weighs 85 pounds, and is 58 inches tall. My son ’s phy sical condition is as fo llows , Ryan has Cerebral Pals y and Epileps y. He was diagnosed at 6 months old and is confined to a wheelchair. He is almost completely dependent on others and is not able to stand on his own. As a result of his phy sical condition, he needs the support and securit y provided b y an FAA Approved Child Restraint, but because of his weight is incapable of compliance with the regulation. I understand that the regulation is written to create a high level of safety for each individual passenger b y ensuring that they are securel y restrained in their seats during all phases of flight. The regulation also ensures that an individual does not cause harm to other passengers on the airplane b y being thrown into them during turbulent or emergency conditions. I propose that Ryan Guerrero be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured b y AmSafe, Inc.), even though he exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits. This ensures a high level of safety for Ryan Guerrero and a high level of safet y for the other passengers and crew on the airplane. In fact, in Ry an ’s case, safety is greatly enhanced by

the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint Sy stem will provide during the entire flight. Enhancing safety

for Ryan Guerrero is in the public interest. In addition, the public interest is also served b y the fact that the use of this FAA Approved Child Restraint Sy stem allows him to use commercial air transportation. Without the support and security of the FAA Approved Child Restraint Sy stem, he wo uld be unable to fl y commerciall y. I also believe that, with certain limitations established by the FAA in a grant to this petition, there can be an equivalent level of safet y to that provided by the affected regulation. The CARES restraint has been certif

ied by the manufacturer for use by children 22

- 44 pounds. However, the components of the CARES restraint are the same as those used in restraints for adults on aircraft and would maintain their integrit y if used b y someone who weighed several hundred poun ds.I believe that the limit of 44 pounds was established because, with the additional weight of the

child attached to the seatback, the seatback would move forward more quickly in an accident scenario and this might cause a higher HIC load for the person seated in the seat behind the passenger using the CARES restraint (because the seatback moving forward more quickly would mean that it would not be there to attenuate the energy from the impact of the person seated behind the person using the CARES restrai nt). In order to achieve an equivalent level of safet y as that provided by the affected regulation, I propose that the FAA establish a limitation in a grant to this petition that Ryan Guerrero onl y sits in a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind her. Therefore, no unsafe condition would exist for a passenger seated behind Ryan while he is using the CARES restraint. Ialso propose that all operations under this exemption be conducted with at least one of Ryan’s parents or a caregiver accompan yi ng him or her. In addition, I propose that Ryan’s parent or caregiver must carry a cop y of this exemption.
I also request that the processing of this petition not be delay ed for publication and comm ent in the Federal Register. We want to travel March 18

- 27, 2013 If you take the time to put this in the Federal Register, it will delay the process and we may

not be able to travel in this timeframe. If it is necessary

to put a summary

in the Federal Regi ster, I submit the following: This is a request for an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the extent required for a child to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint Sy stem on an aircraft, even though the child exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. Due to phy si cal challenges, without the support and securit y of this FAA Approved Child Restraint Sy stem, this child would be unable to fl y. We request that this child be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even tho ugh he exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the safet y of this child is greatl y enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint S ys tem will provide for him during the flight.