alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INCOME FUND X, L.P. AS OF DECEMBER
31, 1999, AND THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,147
<SECURITIES>                                 1,084,554
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,652,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,828,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,947,722
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,881,233<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,607,766
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               657,959
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               184,730
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             222,344
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                542,733
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            542,733
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   542,733
<EPS-BASIC>                                       6.08<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.08<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Net Assets
<F2>Net Income (Loss) per Partnership Unit
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Ronald J. Turner, President and Chief Executive Officer of TC PipeLines GP, Inc., the general partner of TC PipeLines, LP (the Partnership), in
compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, in connection with the
Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) on the date hereof,
that:



|                      |  | /s/ Ronald J. Turner                                                                                                
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 6, 2004 |  | Ronald J. Turner
President and Chief Executive Officer
TC PipeLines GP, Inc., as general partner of
TC PipeLines, LP

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2513]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Agency Information Collection: Submission for OMB Review; Comment 
Request

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of 
Veterans Affairs, has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) the following proposal for the collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0105.
    Title and Form Number: Statement of Witness to Accident, VA Form 
Letter 21-806.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Need and Uses: The form letter is used in support of claims for 
disability benefits based on disability which is the result of an 
accident. The information given by a witness to the accident is used as 
a source to gather specific data regarding the accident and to obtain 
from the witness opinions as well as facts based on his or her own 
knowledge and beliefs regarding the accident.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 4,400 hours.
    Estimated Total Average Burden Per Respondent: 20 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Number of Respondents: 13,200.
    Comments and recommendations concerning this submission should be 
directed to VA's OMB Desk Officer, Allison Eydt, OMB Human Resources 
and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 
Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-4650. DO NOT send requests for benefits 
to this address.

DATES: Comments on the information collection should be directed to the 
OMB Desk Officer by March 5, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Taylor, VA Clearance Officer 
(045A4), (202) 273-8015.

    Dated: January 13, 1997.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Donald L. Neilson,
Director, Information Management Service.
[FR Doc. 97-2513 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          $5,848
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  $57,469
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    $14,030
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               $82,921
<PP&E>                                        $693,676
<DEPRECIATION>                                 $57,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $1,420,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         $451,252
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       $79,229
<OTHER-SE>                                  $1,463,562
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                $1,420,706
<SALES>                                       $369,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              $369,720
<CGS>                                         $229,027
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $539,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              $310,680
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             $15,892
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                $(243,600)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     $(.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $(.03)


</TABLE>
#### MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jefferson Davis YOUNG, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2880.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.

Nov. 25, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 7, 1970.

Young & Burson, by I. J. Burson, Jr., Eunice, for defendant-appellant.

Shotwell, Brown & Sperry, by E. C. Stout, Monroe and Garland, Dejean & Berggreen, by H. B. Dejean, Jr., Opelousa, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before SAVOY, HOOD and MILLER, JJ.

SAVOY, Judge.

This expropriation suit was consolidated for trial and appeal with the companion case of Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Company v. Miller, 229 So.2d 182 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1969), decided also on this date.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case, the judgment of the district court is amended so as to increase the award to defendant, Jefferson Davis Young, Jr., from $830.30 to $1,610.30, together with legal interest on all unpaid amounts from the date of the taking, until paid. In all other respects, the judgment of the district court is affirmed at plaintiff-appellee’s costs.

Amended and affirmed.

HOOD, J., dissents for reasons assigned in 229 So.2d 182 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1969).

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

HOOD, J., is of the opinion that a rehearing should be granted.
#### In re Petition to Suspend Joseph W. GROSS.

No. 40326.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 10, 1971.

Richard C. McFarlain, Tallahassee, Asst. Executive Director, for The Florida Bar, petitioner.

Joseph W. Gross, in pro. per.

PER CURIAM.

By petition of The Florida Bar, it has been made known to this Court that the Honorable Joseph W. Gross, 3704 Euclid Avenue, Tampa, Florida, a member of The Florida Bar in good standing, was adjudged incompetent by reason of paranoid schizophrenia by order of the County Judge of Pinellas County, dated October 30, 1970.

Under Article II, Section S, the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 32 F.S.A., it is provided that a lawyer who has been adjudged mentally incompetent shall be *136suspended from the practice of law. No response has been submitted in behalf of Mr. Gross, and he has not appealed from the order of the County Judge. According to the petition, he is currently in an institution where he is undergoing intensive treatment. We have found it to be within the public interest in the past to enter an order of suspension in cases of incompetency. In re Edwards, 227 So.2d 306 (Fla. 1969).

Accordingly, we deem it advisable to order that the petition for suspension of Joseph W. Gross be granted, subject to any right which he might have to apply for reinstatement at the proper time and upon proper showing.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2820 

To amend the Antiquities Act to increase congressional oversight with respect 

to the designation of national monuments, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Mr. ROMNEY, Mr. RISCH, Mr. SULLIVAN, and Mr. 

CRUZ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Antiquities Act to increase congressional oversight with respect to the designation of national monuments, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Over5 sight of the Antiquities Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO ANTIQUITIES ACT. 

7 Section 320301 of title 54, United States Code (com8 monly referred to as the ‘‘Antiquities Act’’), is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2820 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as 

2 subsections (d) and (e), respectively; and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(c) LIMITATIONS.— 

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Unless extended or modi7 fied by statute, the establishment of a national 

8 monument under subsection (a) or reservation of a 

9 parcel of land under subsection (b) shall be effective 

10 only until the earlier of the following: 

11 ‘‘(A) The date that is 6 months after the 

12 date of the establishment or reservation. 

13 ‘‘(B) The last day of the Congress sitting 

14 at the time of the establishment or reservation. 

15 ‘‘(2) LIMITATION ON FUTURE MONUMENTS.—If 

16 a national monument established under subsection 

17 (a) or reservation of a parcel of land made under 

18 subsection (b) is not extended or modified during the 

19 effective period described in paragraph (1), or is oth20 erwise rejected by statute, the land or property in21 cluded within the boundaries of such national monu22 ment or parcel of land may not be included in the 

23 extension or establishment of a national monument 

24 under this section for a period of 25 years.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 12.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I,
Zeinal Abedin Mahommed Bava, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the company and have:



5.     The
company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors
and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
April 16, 2010

By:

/s/ ZEINAL ABEDIN MAHOMMED BAVAName:

Zeinal Abedin Mahommed BavaTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 185 (Wednesday, September 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49986-49987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25271]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2225]


Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceedings

September 19, 1997.
    Petitions for reconsideration and clarification have been filed in 
the Commission's rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice 
and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of 
these documents are available for viewing and copying in Room 239, 1919 
M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to 
these petitions must be filed October 9, 1997. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of 
the Commission's rule (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must 
be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has 
expired.
    Subject: Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to 
Facilitate Future Development of SMR Systems in the 800 MHz Frequency 
Band (PR Docket No. 93-144, RMs-8117,8030,8029).
    Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 322 of the Communications Act 
Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services (GN Docket No. 93-252).
    Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act--
Competitive Bidding (PP Docket No. 93-253).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 6.

    Subject: Amendment of Part 90 of the Commission's Rules to 
Facilitate Future Development of SMR Systems in the 800 MHz Frequency 
Band (PR Docket No. 93-144, RMs-8117,8030,8029).
    Implementation of Sections 3(n) and 322 of the Communications Act 
Regulatory Treatment of Mobile Services (GN Docket No. 93-252).
    Implementation of Section 309(j) of the Communications Act--
Competitive Bidding (PP Docket No. 93-253).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 3.


[[Page 49987]]


    Subject: Amendment of parts 2 and 15 of the Commission's Rules to 
Deregulate the Equipment Authorization Requirements for Digital Devices 
(ET Docket No. 95-19).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 2.

    Subject: Amendment of the Commission's Rules to Relocate the 
Digital Electronic Message Service from the 18 GHz band to the 24 GHz 
band for Fixed Service (ET Docket No. 97-99).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 2.

    Subject: Applicant for Authorizations and Licenses of Certain 
Stations in Various Services (WT Docket No. 97-115).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 5.

Federal Communications Commission.
Shirley Suggs,
Chief, Publications Branch.
[FR Doc. 97-25271 Filed 9-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
#### Ronald Edward SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1468.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 30, 1977.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, W. C. McLain, Asst. Public Defender, and Ken Glover, Research Asst., Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie King, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court, but we agree with appellant that the phrase “at hard labor” in his sentence is improper. *Brooks v. State,*349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Therefore, we remand this case for correction of sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and OTT and RYDER, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2914
CLAUDE F. MOFFITT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CITY OF CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA; TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF CHARLOTTE; DAVID HINES; REBECCA CHERRY; ROBERT WILLIAMS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-92-438-MU) Submitted: December 17, 1996 Decided: January 13, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Claude F. Moffitt, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Dennis McDonnell, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a) motion for judgment as a matter of law in this action alleging a violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985, 1986(1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. Moffitt v. City of Charlotte , No. CA92-438-MU (W.D.N.C. Sept. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
                                                                    ------------

                           Subsidiaries of the Company

                  NAME                                JURISDICTION

          ADV Engineering S.A.                           France
              Easics, N.V.                               Belgium
      Horizon Semiconductors, Inc.                      Virginia
      Opal Acquisition Corporation                      Delaware
        TranSwitch Asia PTE Ltd.                        Singapore
          TranSwitch II Corp.                           Delaware
          TranSwitch III, Inc.                          Delaware
      TranSwitch Europe N.V./S.A.                        Belgium
  TranSwitch Foreign Sales Corporation             U.S. Virgin Islands
    TranSwitch India Private Limited                      India
     TranSwitch International Corp.                     Delaware
             TranSwitch SA                             Switzerland
    TranSwitch Silicon Valley, Inc.                    California
  TranSwitch Technologies Canada, Inc.                   Canada
            TX Holdings Inc.                            Delaware
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 47399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23842]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[IL145-2, IL152-2; FRL-5890-1]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; Illinois 
Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Illinois

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of the public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 22, 1997, the EPA published a proposed rule (62 FR 
39199) proposing limited approval and limited disapproval of the 
Granite City portion of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 
request which was submitted by the State of Illinois on November 14, 
1995, May 9, 1996, June 14, 1996, and February 3, 1997, to meet 
commitments related to the conditional approval of Illinois' May 15, 
1992, SIP submittal for the Lake Calumet (SE Chicago), McCook, and 
Granite City, Illinois, Particulate Matter (PM) nonattainment areas. 
The proposed limited approval and limited disapproval action entails 
approval of the submitted regulations into the Illinois SIP for their 
strengthening effect, and disapproval of the submittal for not meeting 
all of the commitments of the conditional approval. All of the 
deficiencies were corrected, except that Illinois failed to provide an 
opacity limit for coke oven combustion stacks which is reflective of 
their mass limits. In the same notice, the EPA also proposed to 
disapprove Illinois' March 19, 1996, and October 15, 1996, request to 
redesignate the Granite City area to attainment for PM because the area 
does not have a fully approved implementation plan. The EPA is 
announcing a 60-day extension of the public comment period on the July 
22, 1997, proposed rule.

DATES: Written comments on the July 22, 1997, proposed rule must be 
received on or before October 20, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed to: J. Elmer Bortzer, 
Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    Copies of the documents relevant to this action are available for 
inspection during normal business hours at: Regulation Development 
Section, Regulation Development Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Pohlman, Environmental 
Scientist, Regulation Development Section, Regulation Development 
Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-3299.

    Dated: August 15, 1997.
David A. Ullrich,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-23842 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### William PITCHFORD and Marjorie Pitchford, his wife, Appellants, v. Claud CAMPBELL and Rose Campbell, his wife, Appellees.

No. 69-200.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 11, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Martin County; Wallace Sample, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.