alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10283

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Robert Earl Ramseur, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:16-CR-65-1

Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Costa, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Robert Earl Ramseur appeals the $141,419.04 restitution award 

imposed on remand from United States v. Ramseur, 793 F. App’x 245 (5th 

Cir. 2019), pursuant to his conviction for willfully assisting the preparation 

of false income tax returns. The district court originally ordered $399,400 in 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 3, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10283 Document: 00515659589 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/03/2020
No. 20-10283

2

restitution, but we held that included amounts beyond the tax returns for 

which he was convicted and failed to account for tax payments made by some 

of Ramseur’s’ clients on returns that were the basis for his convictions. See 

id. at 249. Ramseur now challenges the new, reduced restitution order on the 

ground that it exceeds the Internal Revenue Service’s actual loss from the 

offenses of conviction.

The issue whether a restitution award is illegal is reviewed de novo,

and the amount of the restitution award is reviewed for abuse of discretion. 

United States v. Arledge, 553 F.3d 881, 897 (5th Cir. 2008). The amount of a 

victim’s restitution award must be tied to only the loss that directly resulted 

from the offense of conviction; the gain to the defendant on account of his 

illegal conduct is not relevant to the calculation of the restitution award. Id. 

at 899. Citing United States v. Tawil, 40 F. App’x 531 (9th Cir. 2002), 

Ramseur argues that the restitution award should be reduced by $24,113 that 

was erroneously deposited by the IRS into the accounts of three taxpayers 

against whom the IRS has not sought a refund. Tawil, which is factually 

distinguishable, is not persuasive because there was no evidence in that case 

that the defendants’ scheme caused the full amount of the loss at issue. See

40 F. App’x at 533, 535. In contrast, Ramseur’s acts of conviction caused the 

entire $141,419.04 loss to the IRS, regardless of the amount he personally 

received or from which he benefitted. See Arledge, 553 F.3d at 899. The 

restitution award therefore is neither illegal nor an abuse of discretion. See 

id. at 897-99.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-10283 Document: 00515659589 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/03/2020
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26585]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3803-000]

San Diego Gas & Electric Company; Notice of Filing

October 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 11, 1997, San Diego Gas & Electric 
Company tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced 
docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene of protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before October 9, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26585 Filed 10-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
Page 6 of 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FAIRFIELD
MANUFACTURING CO., INC'S 1998 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K FILLING AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000904543
<NAME> FAIRFIELD MANUFACTURING COMPANY INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,822
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (700)
<INVENTORY>                                     25,519
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,078
<PP&E>                                         163,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                (94,956)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,208
<BONDS>                                        112,150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           48,042
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                    (49,105)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   175,118
<SALES>                                        220,316
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               220,316
<CGS>                                          178,933
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  195,749
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    70
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (426)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,074
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 The Board of Directors
 Merge Healthcare Incorporated:
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333–34884, 333–100104, 333–107997, 333–40832, 333–40882, 333–107991, 333–125386) on Form S–8 and (Nos. 333–125603, 333–161689, 333–161691) on Form S–3 of Merge Healthcare Incorporated of our report dated March 31, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Merge Healthcare Incorporated and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three–year period ended December 31, 2007, which report appears in this December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10–K of Merge Healthcare Incorporated.
 
 Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share–Based Payment, on January 1, 2006 and the adoption of the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,on January 1, 2007.
 
 Our report on the consolidated financial statements also refers to the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
 
 /s/ KPMG LLP
 Chicago, Illinois
 March 12, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26225]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-526-001]


Mississippi River Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

September 29, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 24, 1997, Mississippi River 
Transmission Corporation (MRT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Third Revised Sheet 
No. 9, with a proposed effective date of October 12, 1997.
    MRT states that the purpose of this filing is to adjust and reduce 
the Account No. 191 amounts MRT requested authority to direct bill its 
former Rate Schedule CD-1 and SGS-1 customers as a result of additional 
prior period adjustments to MRT's Account No. 191 balance to remove 
that percentage of costs attributable to MRT's non-jurisdictional 
direct industrial sales during the relevant period.
    MRT states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all of its 
customers, including all former Rate Schedule CD-1 and STS-1 customers, 
and the State Commissions of Arkansas, Illinois, and Missouri.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests should 
be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26225 Filed 10-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
November 15, 2001



Scott R. Gershon
c/o Intercallnet, Inc.
6340 NW 5th Way
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309

Re:  Repayment of Payroll

Dear Mr. Gershon;

Please accept this letter as the official terms and conditions surrounding the
payroll deferral between you and Intercallnet, Inc. (the Company). You have
agreed to defer drawing payroll from the Company commencing with the payroll
period dated November 23, 2001 which represents the two week pay period ended
November 16,2001. Such payroll deferral will continue until the Company's cash
flow is sufficient to support the payment of payroll to you, as an executive of
the Company, but shall continue no longer than through December 31, 2001.
Interest shall accrue at a rate of prime plus 2% on a bi-weekly basis to be
calculated over the time period that such deferred amounts are outstanding.

When the Company's cash flow is sufficient to support the payment of payroll to
you as an executive, then bi-weekly payroll shall resume. At such time, the
total amount of the deferred payroll (including accrued interest) will be
reviewed and the repayment terms will be determined as either a lump sum
repayment or scheduled payments over a specific time period depending on the
financial condition of the Company.



Sincerely,                                       Accepted By:

/s/ George A. Pacinelli                         /s/ Scott R. Gershon
---------------------------                     --------------------------------
George A. Pacinelli                                 Scott R. Gershon
President                                           Chief Executive Officer
USGS CMG OVERVIEW LOG

ACTIVITY ID: 99FGS02

TOPIC INFORMATION

USGS ACTIVITY ID 99FGS02

OTHER ID (IF ANY)

ORGANIZATION U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine 

Science Center and Florida Geological Survey

PROJECT

AREAS OF OPERATION Gulf of Mexico (Venice, FL)

CHIEF SCIENTIST(S) Henry Freedenberg

INFORMATION

SPECIALIST(S) Dana S. Wiese and Arnell S. Forde

ACTIVITY TYPE Geophysical Survey (high-resolution seismic)

SCIENTIFIC

PURPOSE/GOALS Subsurface Characterization

PLATFORM R/V Geoquest

STARTING DATE November 17, 1999

STARTING PORT Venice, Florida

ENDING DATE November 18, 1999 

ENDING PORT Venice, Florida

EQUIPMENT USED

Boomer System (Applied Acoustic CSP 300 power supply, 

Huntec plate, and Innovative Transducer Inc. (ITI) ST-5 10-

channel hydrophones), Triton Elics International (TEI) Delph 

Seismic acquisition software version 1.36, and Trimble 

Centurion GPS (running Fugawi software) navigation system

with trim_rmc.pln navigation driver.

INFORMATION 

TO BE DERIVED (GRAIN SIZE, DEPTH 

TO BASEMENT)

Shallow geologic framework - subbottom image profiles.

SUMMARY OF ACTIVITY

AND DATA GATHERED A total of 6 boomer 2-D lines were collected.

NOTES

Digital 99FGS02 logs were generated by 

A. Forde in June 2012 using the handwritten logs and personal 

accounts of the crew members.
#### Arthur Hudson MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-313.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 10, 1970.

Robert P. Miller, Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Horace A. Knowlton, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. See Mulvey v. State, 41 So.2d 156 (Fla.1949).

CARROLL, DONALD K„ Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 11, 2012

jam 

# Order

January 11, 2012

144393 (36)

RONELY DESHON CHAMBERS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 144393

CoA: 302064
JEFFREY B. HOLLANDER and

LAW OFFICES OF JEFF REY B. HOLLANDER

Defendants-Appellees.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Court, the motion to waiv e fees is considered and it is DENIED
because MCL 600.2963 re quires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Appellant is not required to pay an initial partial fee. However, for an appeal to be filed, appellant must resubmit a copy of this order, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this order within 21 days. By doing this, appellant becomes responsible for paying the $375.00 filing fee. Failu re to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court. If appellant timely refiles the pleadings, m onthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to appellant’s account until the payments equal the total amount of the filing fee stated above. That
amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) pl aintiff shall not file further appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this ca se is paid in full.
The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this orde r to appellant and return appellant’s pleadings with this order.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2886 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2886

To permit manufacturers of generic drugs to provide additional warnings 
 with respect to such drugs in the same manner that the Food and Drug 
              Administration allows brand names to do so.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2023

Mr. Van Hollen (for himself, Mr. Brown, Mr. Blumenthal, and Mr. Coons) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permit manufacturers of generic drugs to provide additional warnings 
 with respect to such drugs in the same manner that the Food and Drug 
              Administration allows brand names to do so.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Updated Drug Labeling for Patient 
Safety Act''.

SEC. 2. WARNING LABELING WITH RESPECT TO GENERIC DRUGS.

    Section 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 355(j)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(14)(A) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, 
        the holder of an approved application under this subsection may 
        change the labeling of a drug so approved in the same manner 
        authorized by regulation for the holder of an approved new drug 
        application under subsection (b).
            ``(B) In the event of a labeling change made under 
        subparagraph (A), the Secretary may order conforming changes to 
        the labeling of the equivalent listed drug and each drug 
        approved under this subsection that corresponds to such listed 
        drug.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          64,412
<SECURITIES>                                        63
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,210
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,506
<PP&E>                                          88,326
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 227,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,376
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           416
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,961
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   227,626
<SALES>                                        285,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               289,940
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237,249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (326)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,207
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,545
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,133
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             51,545
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,412
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.42
        

</TABLE>
```

[104th Congress Public Law 22]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ22.104]

[[Page 109 STAT. 260]]

Public Law 104-22
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 
  1994 until October 1, 1995, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Aug. 14, 
                         1995 -  [H.R. 2161]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations 
Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103-236), 
as <<NOTE: Ante, p. 191.>>  amended by Public Law 104-17, is amended by 
striking ``August 15, 1995,'' and inserting ``October 1, 1995,''.

    (b) Consultation.--For purposes of any exercise of the authority 
provided in section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 
Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103-236) prior to August 16, 
1995, the written policy justification dated June 1, 1995, and submitted 
to the Congress in accordance with section 583(b)(1) of such Act, and 
the consultations associated with such policy justification, shall be 
deemed to satisfy the requirements of section 583(b)(1) of such Act.

    Approved August 14, 1995.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2161:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):
            Aug. 2, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 11, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 00-1222 

________________________________________________________________________ 

BOUNDARY WATERS 

 Agreements Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and CANADA 

Amending the Agreement of 

October 26, 1989 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Ottawa December 20 and 22, 2000 

and 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Washington January 14 and June 9, 2005 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 CANADA 

 

 Boundary Waters 

 Agreements amending the agreement of 

 October 26, 1989. 

 Effected by exchange of notes at 

 Ottawa December 20 and 22, 2000; 

 Entered into force December 22, 2000. 

 And effected by exchange of notes at 

 Washington January 14 and June 9, 2005; 

 Entered into force June 9, 2005.
### At a Glance, Issuing EDSP Second List Test Orders

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention

March 28, 2013 EPA issues orders using

FIFRA/FFDCA

policies and procedures

SDWA

§1457?

Orphan

Chemical

Evaluate Data Pesticide

Chemical? EDSP

2 nd List

Recipients?

1 st

‐ CDR

2 nd

‐ Other

EPA issues orders using

SDWA §1457/FFDCA

policies and procedures

Data? Data?

No

No

No

Yes Yes Yes