alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WEBSTER LUMBER COMPANY, Inc.; American Title Insurance Company, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DUPUY & DUPUY DEVELOPERS, INC. et al., A. J. Dupuy, Sr., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11220.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Second Circuit.

Sept. 22, 1969.

James B. Wells, Bossier City, for The National Bank of Bossier City, administrator of the estate of A. J. Dupuy, Sr., third-party defendant-appellant; Booth, Lock-ard, Jack, Pleasant & LeSage, Shreveport, H. F. Sockrider, Jr., Shreveport, of counsel.

Peters, Ward, Johnson & Phillips, Shreveport, for American Title Ins. Co., third-party plaintiff-appellee; Hugh T. Ward, Shreveport, of counsel.

Before AYRES, BOLIN, and DIXON, JJ-

AYRES, Judge.

The facts are similar and the issues are the same as those which existed and which were presented in the companion case of Texas Industries, Inc., d. b. a. Louisiana Industries, v. Dupuy & Dupuy Developers, Inc., et al., bearing No. 11218 on the docket of this court, with which this case was consolidated for trial, and which has this day been decided (227 So.2d 265). The conclusions reached in the companion case are appropriate here.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed, so far as it condemned A. J. Dupuy, Sr., is annulled, avoided, reversed, and set aside; and

It is now ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the demands of the third-party plaintiff, American Title Insurance Company, against the third-party defendant, A. J. Dupuy, Sr., of whose estate The National Bank of Bossier City is administrator, and which has been substituted as proper party litigant, be, and the same are hereby, rejected and dismissed at the cost of the third-party plaintiff.

Reversed and rendered.
PRIVATE LAW 105–8—NOV. 10, 1998

Private Law 105–8

105th Congress

An Act

For the relief of Mercedes Del Carmen Quiroz Martinez Cruz.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR MERCEDES DEL CARMEN QUIROZ MARTINEZ CRUZ.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Mercedes Del Carmen Quiroz Martinez Cruz

shall be classified as an immediate relative within the meaning

of section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act

for purposes of approval of a relative visa petition filed under

section 204 of such Act by Mercedes Del Carmen Quiroz Martinez

Cruz and the filing of an application for an immigrant visa or

for adjustment of status.

(b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Mercedes Del Carmen Quiroz

Martinez Cruz enters the United States before the filing deadline

specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have entered

and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible

for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration

and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

(c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.— Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the petition and the

application for issuance of an immigrant visa or the application

for adjustment of status are filed by Mercedes Del Carmen Quiroz

Martinez Cruz with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date

of the enactment of this Act.

(d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent residence to Mercedes

Del Carmen Quiroz Martinez Cruz, the Secretary of State shall

instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, for the following fiscal

year, the total number of immigrant visas available under section

201(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Approved November 10, 1998.

Nov. 10, 1998

[H.R. 1834]
#### STATE ex rel. Elva Anna PACHEO v. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD DISTRICT (Writ of Prohibition Issued).

No. 38838.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Prohibition without opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25686]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Committee on Employee Benefits of the 
Federal Reserve System*.

Time and Date: 3:00 p.m., Tuesday, September 30, 1997.

Place: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:

    1. Proposals relating to Federal Reserve System benefits.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

    <bullet> The Committee on Employee Benefits considers matters 
relating to the Retirement, Thrift, Long-Term Disability Income, and 
Insurance Plans for Employees of the Federal Reserve System.

Contact Person for More Information: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204.

    Dated: September 23, 1997.
William W. Wiles,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-25686 Filed 9-23-97; 3:55 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Arthur Frederick SCHNEIDER et ux., Appellants, v. OKALOOSA ISLAND AUTHORITY, a governmental agency under the Laws of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-288.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

July 31, 1969.

James E. Moore, Merritt Island, and E. Wilson Crump, II, Niceville, for appellants.

Joseph R. Anderson, Fort Walton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Johnson v. Green (Fla.1951), 54 So.2d 44; Leathers Development Co. v. Orange Inv. Co. (1929), 97 Fla. 278, 120 So. 329.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
#### SKYLARK ESTATES, INC., a Florida corporation, and Joseph Needle and Elizabeth Needle, his wife, Appellants, v. RICHLAND AGENCY, INC., a New York corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-359.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

June 20, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Roger F. Dykes, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 23.1
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 Board of Directors and Shareholders
 Merge Healthcare Incorporated
 Milwaukee, Wisconsin
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-125603, 333-161689 and 333-161691) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-34884, 333-100104, 333-107997, 333-40882, 333-107991 and 333-125386) of Merge Healthcare Incorporated of our reports dated March 12, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of Merge Healthcare Incorporated’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K.
 
 /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
 
 Milwaukee, Wisconsin
 March 12, 2010
#### DIVERSIFIED COMPONENTS DIVISION OF B & F OF CLEARWATER, INC., Petitioner, v. DIVERSIFIED CONSTRUCTION COMPONENTS, INC., Respondent.

No. 38394.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 29, 1969.

Burton C. Easton, Clearwater, for petitioner.

Stephen D. Hughes, Larbo, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari- reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After argument and upon further consideration, we have determined the writ was improvidently issued.

The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50653]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25510]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Advisory Circular 25.812-2. Floor Proximity Emergency Escape Path 
Marking Systems Incorporating Photoluminscent Elements

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of issuance of advisory circular.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the issuance of Advisory Circular (AC) 
25.812-2, Floor Proximity Emergency Escape Path Marking Systems 
Incorporating Photoluminescent Elements. This AC provides guidance 
material for use in demonstrating compliance with the provisions of 
part 25 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) regarding floor 
proximity emergency escape path marking systems (FPEEPMS) which 
incorporate photoluminesent elements. Like all ACs, it is not 
regulatory but is to provide guidance for applicants in demonstrating 
compliance with the objective safety standards set forth in the rule.

DATES: Advisory Circular 25.812-2 was issued by the Manager, Transport 
Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, ANM-100, on July 
24, 1997.

HOW TO OBTAIN COPIES: A copy may be obtained by writing to the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Subsequent Distribution Office, DOT 
Warehouse, SVC-121.23, 3341Q 75th Ave., Landover, MD 20785, telephone 
301-322-5377, or faxing your request to the warehouse at 301-386-5394.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 15, 1997.
James V. Devany,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service, ANM-100.
[FR Doc. 97-25510 Filed 9-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### Leonard SMITH, Jr., et al. v. Mrs. Ida Belle HOWELL.

No. 49497.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 17, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 14, 1977.

William T. Bailey, Lucedale, for appellant.

Hurt *&*Dickerson, Gerald A. Dickerson, Lucedale, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, George County; Darwin M. Maples, Judge.

Before INZER, P. J., ROBERTSON and BROOM, JJ., and W. W. BROWN, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51157-51158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25872]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

TA-W-32,487; Savannah Manufacturing Corporation, Savannah, 
Tennessee;
TA-W-32,487C; Hickory Hills Industries, Incorporated, New York, New 
York

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on July 3, 1996, applicable to 
all workers of Savannah Manufacturing Corporation, Savannah, Tennessee. 
The notice was published in the Federal Register on August 2, 1996 (61 
FR 40454).
    At the request of a petitioner, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
worker separations occurred at Hickory Hills Industries, Incorporated, 
New York, New York when it closed in October, 1996. The workers at the 
New York, New York location provided sales office functions and 
designing to support production of children's sportswear at Hickory 
Hills Industries, Incorporated, also known as Savannah Manufacturing. 
Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to cover 
workers at Hickory Hills Industries, Incorporated, New York, New York.

[[Page 51158]]

    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Savannah Manufacturing Corporation adversely affected by 
increased imports.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-32,487 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Savannah Manufacturing Corporation, Savannah, 
Tennessee (TA-W-32,487), and Hickory Hills Industries, Incorporated, 
New York, New York (TA-W-32,487C) who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after June 7, 1995 are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act 
of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 12th day of September, 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-25872 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26038]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Postal Service Board of Governors; Sunshine Act Meeting

TIMES AND DATES: 12:30 p.m., Monday, October 6, 1997; 8:30 a.m., 
Tuesday, October 7, 1997.

PLACE: Norman, Oklahoma, at the University of Oklahoma, 900 Asp Avenue, 
in the Oklahoma Memorial Union Ballroom.

STATUS: October 6 (Closed); October 7 (Open).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Monday, October 6--12:30 p.m. (Closed)
    1. Status Report on the Tray Management System.
    2. Postal Rate Commission Opinion and Recommended Decision in 
Docket No. MC97-4, Bulk Parcel Return Service and Shipper Paid 
Forwarding.
    3. Budget Outlook.
Tuesday, October 7--8:30 a.m. (Open)
    1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, September 8-9, 1997.
    2. Remarks of the Postmaster General/Chief Executive Office.
    3. Board of Governors 1998 Meeting Schedule.
    4. Office of the Governors FY 1998 Budget.
    5. Consideration of Postal Square Development Project.
    6. Fiscal Year 1998 Operating Budget.
    7. Review of the Five-Year Capital Investment Plan.
    8. Tentative Agenda for the November 3-4, 1997, meeting in 
Washington, D.C.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Thomas J. Koerber, Secretary of 
the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20260-100. Telephone (202) 268-4800.
Thomas J. Koerber,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26038 Filed 9-26-97; 1:04 p.m.]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
No. 85033 

FILE 

, J. 

Hardesty 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction. Eighth 

Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jacqueline M. Bluth, Judge. 

This court's review of this appeal revealed a potential 

jurisdictional defect. The judgment of conviction was entered on May 25, 

2022. However, the notice of appeal was not filed until July 12, 2022, well 

after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). 

Accordingly, on July 20, 2022, this court directed appellant's counsel to 

show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

In response to this court's show-cause order, appellant's counsel 

concedes that this appeal was untimely filed. Because an untimely notice of 

appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court, see Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 

349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994), this court lacks jurisdiction over this 

appeal and 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 

(74Th.

DERRICK BRYAN ALLEN, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

J. 

Stiglich Herndon 

7_2 - wird' 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

I 947A
cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge 

Clark County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

4(1.) 1447A

9
### Public and industrial water supplies of the Mississippian Plateau region, Kentucky

By: Richmond F. Brown

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir341

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25188]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Defense Acquisition Reform, 
Phase IV

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Defense Acquisition 
Reform, Phase IV will meet in open session on October 3, 1997 at the 
Pentagon, Room 1E801#4, Arlington, Virginia.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense.
    Persons interested in further information should call Mr. Rick 
Sylvester at (703) 697-6398.

    Dated: September 18, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-25188 Filed 9-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Lazarus Government Center 

50 W. Town St., Suite 700 

P.O. Box 1049 

Columbus, OH 43216 

Dear Mr. Hodanbosi: 

Thank you for your September 16, 2015 recommendations regarding the attainment status areas in Ohio 

under the 2010 sulfur dioxide (S02) national ambient air quality standard {NAAQS). As you know, EPA is 

subject to a March 2, 2015 court order directing us to promulgate S02 designations for these areas 

under section 107 of the Clean Air Act by July 2, 2016. Specifically, we are required to promulgate 

designations for these areas because they contain sources meeting the S02 emissions criteria identified 

in the consent decree. The information you provided will greatly help us meet this duty, and ensure protection of public health in Ohio. 

In addition to the information you have provided, we have recently received modeling and related 

information from the Sierra Club that is relevant to a subset of the areas to be addressed by July 2, 2016. 

In your state, we have received information pertinent to the areas near the following power plants: 

Gavin and Zimmer. We understand that you have received this information directly from the Sierra 

Club. Please let us know if you have any questions about the information we have received or if you 

need any additional information. 

I am writing to solicit your review of the information that Sierra Club has provided, so that t he EPA can 

base its designations decisions on the best available information. The Clean Air Act provides for 

designations to be developed through a partnership of state agencies and EPA; however, we also believe 

it is important to consider significant and relevant information that members of the public provide to us. 

Consistent with the structure of the Clean Air Act, we believe that the best first step in addressing this 

information would be for your agency to provide its review of this information. Since the Sierra Club's 

recommendations differ from your recommendation, we would welcome your commentar{ generally on 

the information as well your detailed review of the elements of Sierra Club's analysis. To the extent 

practicable, we would appreciate quantitative comparisons of data used in Sierra Club's analysis 

compared to the data used in your analysis, to help us evaluate the elements ofthe two analyses. 

We wou ld appreciate your review of Sierra Club's information by November 17, 2015. Your timely 

review would provide us valuable assistance in our review of your designation recommendations and 

development of our intended designations, which we are aiming to complete by the end of January 

2016. We will then publish notice of our intended designations for public comment, and, as required by 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (100% Post-Consumer) 
John Mooney l.___) 

Air Programs Branch, Chief
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51160-51161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA 
Transitional Adjustment Assistance

NAFTA-01068; Hickory Hills Industries, Incorporated; Savannah 
Manufacturing Company, Savannah, Tennessee;
NAFTA-01068C; Hickory Hills Industries, Incorporated, New York, New 
York

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter 2, Title II, of the 
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor 
issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for NAFTA Transitional 
Adjustment Assistance on July 22, 1996, applicable to all workers of 
Hickory Hills Industries, Incorporated, Savannah Manufacturing Company, 
Savannah, Tennessee. The notice was published in the Federal Register 
on August 6, 1996 (61 FR 40853).
    At the request of a petitioner, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
worker separations occurred at Hickory Hills Industries, Incorporated, 
New York, New York when it closed in October, 1996. The workers at New 
York, New York location provided sales office functions and designing 
to support production of children's sportswear at Savannah 
Manufacturing. Accordingly, the Department is amending the 
certification to cover workers at the Hickory Hills Industries, 
Incorporated, New York, New York.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Hickory Industries, Incorporated

[[Page 51161]]

adversely affected by imports from Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-01068 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Hickory Hills Industries, Incorporated, Savannah 
Manufacturing Company, Savannah, Tennessee (NAFTA-01068) and Hickory 
Hills Industries, Incorporated, New York, New York (NAFTA-01068C) 
who became totally or partially separated from employment on or 
after June 7, 1995 are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 
250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 12th day of September 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-25873 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M