alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James H. ROARK, Barbara Jean Roark, his wife, and Frank P. Fisher, Appellants, v. Jack WELDON et ux., et al., Appellees.

No. 69-375.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 27, 1970.

Ernest Keene Bard, of Fowler, White, Collins, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam, Tampa, for appellants.

Robert S. Edwards, of Edwards & Sawyer, Plant City, for appellees.

MANN, Judge.

Everything is coming up thorns in Rose-land Park. This pleasant subdivision was platted in 1925 and restricted to residential use. Plant City’s appeal was not discovered before the collapse of the Florida boom, and it was not until after World War II that substantial development occurred, and many lots are not yet built on. The plaintiffs now contend that circumstances have so changed as to warrant invalidation of the restrictions, and defendants disagree.

State Road 39 has been four-laned, and plaintiffs’ lots abut it. Across the road is a new shopping center. It is undisputed that sale of plaintiffs’ property for commercial purposes, for which it has now been rezoned, would yield them a far greater return than would the difficult task of development for residential use.

On the other hand, the Executive Director of the Hillsborough *County*Planning Commission testified that a by-pass, now partially completed but missing a link vital to the interests of those who live in Rose-land Park, will take much of the traffic around the area. He also testified that the better planning practice would not permit commercial encroachment on the subdivision. A real estate broker testified that the plaintiffs’ property is saleable for residential purposes.

The trial judge took the trouble to visit the property and considered a great deal of evidence. His final judgment denied the relief sought and it is as fully substantiated by the record in this case as was the decree affirmed by the Supreme Court of Florida in Wahrendorff v. Moore, Fla.1957, 93 So.2d 720. The legal principles governing this type of case, in which there simply is no single “right” answer that can satisfy all the parties, are there ably discussed by Mr. Justice Thornal and need not be reiterated. The record in this case discloses no departure from those principles.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J„ and McNULTY, J., concur.
16303	Waterman	Drive

Van	Nuys,	California	91406

Tel:					+1	818.902.0229

Fax:			+1	818.902.9278

www.helinet.com

May 14 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave. , SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re

. Petition to Amend FAA Exemption No. 11160 (the “Exemption”)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Helinet Aviation Services, LLC , hereby requests approva l to amend the Exemption to permit Helinet to

operate an additional model of UAS

– the D JI Inspire 1. The FAA has previously authorized u se of the DJI

Ins pire for commercial purposes on multiple occasions ( e.g.

, Exemption Nos. 11318 , 11447, 11458, 11461,

and 11463).

On Feb ruary 2, 2015, the FAA issued the Exemption to Helinet to utilize th e DJI S1000 and Gryphon

Dynamics X8 UAS for motion picture and television filming.

Helinet’s amended Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM) is being submitted separately

pursuant to 14 CFR §11.35(b). Section 6 ( page s 5

- 6 and 11

- 12 ) of the FOPM c ontains the proposed

amendment.

All UAS operations will continue to fully adhere to the conditions of the Exemption and all operations will be

in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption.

Thank you for your consideration of our request.

If you h ave any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at 818.902.0229.

Sincerely yours,

Jack Snyder

Vice President and General Counsel

Helinet Aviation Services, LLC
April 19, 2016

Page 1 of 2

U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) 

Freedom of Navigation (FON) Report 

for Fiscal Year (FY) 2015

Below is a summary of excessive maritime claims that were challenged by DoD 

operational assertions and activities during the period of October 1, 2014, through

September 30, 2015, in order to preserve the rights, freedoms, and lawful uses of the

sea and airspace guaranteed to all nations under international law:

Claimant Excessive Maritime Claims

Argentina Prior notification required for foreign warships to enter the 

territorial sea (TTS).

China* Excessive straight baselines; jurisdiction over airspace above the 

Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ); restriction on foreign aircraft flying 

through an Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) without the 

intent to enter national airspace; domestic law criminalizing survey 

activity by foreign entities in the EEZ; prior permission required for 

innocent passage of foreign military ships through the TTS.

India* Prior consent required for military exercises or maneuvers in the 

EEZ.

Indonesia* Limits on archipelagic sea lane passage through normal routes 

used for international navigation; prior notification

required for foreign warships to enter the TTS and archipelagic

waters; restriction on stopping, dropping anchor, or cruising

without legitimate reason in seas adjoining territorial seas.

Iran* Restrictions on right of transit passage through Strait of Hormuz to

States Parties to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the 

Sea; prohibition on foreign military activities and practices in the 

EEZ.

Libya* Claimed historical waters status (i.e., internal waters) for the

Gulf of Sidra.

Malaysia* Prior authorization required for nuclear-powered ships to enter 

the TTS; consent required for military exercises or maneuvers in

the EEZ.

Maldives* Prior permission required for foreign vessels to enter the EEZ.

Nicaragua Excessive straight baselines and 200-nautical mile TTS; prior

notification required for vessels to enter the TTS; security

jurisdiction in the contiguous zone; prior notification to enter the 

contiguous zone.

Oman* Prior permission required for innocent passage of foreign military 

ships through the TTS; requirement for innocent passage through 

the Strait of Hormuz (an international strait).

Philippines* Claims archipelagic waters as internal waters.
U.S. Department of Defense

Freedom of Navigation Report

For Fiscal Year 2015

Page 2 of 2

Claimant Excessive Maritime Claims

Taiwan Prior notification required for foreign military or government vessels 

to enter the TTS.

Vietnam* Excessive straight baselines; prior notification required for foreign 

warships to enter the TTS.

Note: * designates multiple challenges to the claim(s) during the reporting period.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 192 (Friday, October 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26238]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Notice of information collection to be submitted to OMB to 
review and approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the FDIC hereby gives notice that it 
plans to submit to the Office of Management and Budget a request for 
OMB review and approval of the information collection system described 
below.
    Type of Review: Renewal of currently approved collection.
    Title: Application For Consent To Reduce or Retire Capital.
    Form Number: None.
    OMB Number: 3064-0079.
    Annual Burden:
      Number of applications: 120.
      Hours to prepare an application: 1.
      Total annual burden hours: 120.
    Expiration Date of OMB Clearance: October 31, 1997.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Washington, D.C. 20503.
    FDIC Contact: Steven F. Hanft, (202) 898-3907, Office of the 
Executive Secretary, Room F-4080, Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation, 550 17th Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20429.
    Comments: Comments on this collection of information are welcome 
and should be submitted on or before November 3, 1997, to both the 
OMB reviewer and the FDIC contact listed above.

ADDRESSES: Information about this submission including copies of the 
proposed collection of information, may be obtained by calling or 
writing the FDIC contact listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This collection requires insured state 
nonmember banks that propose to change their capital structure to 
submit an application containing information about the proposed change 
in order to obtain FDIC's consent to reduce or retire capital. The FDIC 
evaluates the information contained in the letter application in 
relation to statutory considerations and makes a decision to grant or 
to withhold consent.

    Dated: September 30, 1997.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-26238 Filed 10-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
Searched for **http://www.whitehousehistory.org/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.whitehousehistory.org/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-80537 and 333-88183) pertaining to Dave & Buster's, Inc. 1995
Stock Option Plan and Employee 401(k) Savings Plan of our report, dated March
21, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Dave &
Buster's, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
February 3, 2002.


                                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
April 18, 2002
Exhibit 32.2 - Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of RPM Advantage, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending Sptember 30 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
thereof (the "Report").

I, David R. Pressler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David R. Pressler
--------------------------
    David R. Pressler
    CEO President and Director


Date  April 25, 2011
      -----------------
### Compilation of records of surface waters of the United States, October 1950 to September 1960, part 2–A. South Atlantic slope basins, James River to Savannah River

By: E. L. Hendricks

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1723

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2887 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2887

 To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to require the 
acceptance of cash payments for entrance fees at units of the National 
                              Park System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2023

 Ms. Lummis (for herself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Risch, Mrs. 
    Capito, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Cramer, and Mr. Crapo) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to require the 
acceptance of cash payments for entrance fees at units of the National 
                              Park System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Access to Recreation with 
Cash Act'' or the ``PARC Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCEPTANCE OF CASH PAYMENTS FOR ENTRANCE FEES AT UNITS OF THE 
              NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM.

    Section 803(e) of the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (16 
U.S.C. 6802(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Acceptance of cash payments required.--The Secretary 
        of the Interior shall require that any unit of the National 
        Park System at which an entrance fee is charged in accordance 
        with paragraph (1) accept cash as a form of payment for the 
        entrance fee.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Joseph LAMBS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1016.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 13, 1971.

Appeal from Court of Record, Brevard County; Joe A. Cowart, Jr., Judge.

Appeal quashed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (this
Amendment) to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information
contained in this Amendment fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ALCiS Health, Inc.



|                    |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 29, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Brian J. Berchtold 
|                    |  |  |  | Brian J. Berchtold     
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  | 
|Date: June 29, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Mark E. Lemma      
|                    |  |  |  | Mark E. Lemma          
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Amendment pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not be deemed filed by for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Federal Securities Act of 1933, as amended or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference
#### Gordon L. OATES, Father and Next Friend of Patricia Oates v. Arthur J. WARREN, III, a Minor, by Arthur J. Warren, Jr., Father and Next Friend.

No. 45426.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 20, 1969.

Barnett & Barnett, Jackson, for appellant.

Watkins & Eager, W. Thad Cochran, Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 2 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 3 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 4 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 5 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 6 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 7 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 8 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 9 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 10 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 11 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 12 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 13 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 14 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 15 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 16 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 17 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 18 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 19 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 20 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 21 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 22 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 23 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 24 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 25 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 26 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 27 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 28 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 29 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 30 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 31 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 32 of 33Case 1:05-cv-00288-WLS Document 22 Filed 09/28/06 Page 33 of 33
Case 1:05-cv-00226-MBC-SPB   Document 18   Filed 07/21/06   Page 1 of 1
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. James Eugene MATNEY, Appellee.

No. M-73.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 9, 1970.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1970.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Joseph A. St. Ana, Jacksonville, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida has appealed a final judgment dismissing the information filed against appellee herein and discharging him from custody because of the State’s failure or refusal to divulge the name of its confidential informant whose information was used in part as a basis for procuring a search warrant. The judgment is reversed upon the authority of the decision of this court in the companion case of State of Florida v. James Eugene Matney, Leo Schuty a/k/a Leo Dean Welsh, and Susan Lind Hyers a/k/a Susan F. Matney, Case No. M-82, opinion filed this date, 236 So.2d 166.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 4.3



                            [SHAWMUT CAPITAL LETTERHEAD]



September 8, 1995


Ms. Theresa Carlise
National Record Mart, Inc.
507 Forest Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15106


Dear Theresa,

Reference is made to the Loan and Security Agreement (the "Loan Agreement")
dated June 11, 1993, by and between National Record Mart, Inc. ("the Borrower"),
and Shawmut Capital Corp., (f/k/a Barclays Business Credit, Inc.) ("the
Lender"), together with all documents, instruments, mortgages and letters
executed pursuant thereto (collectively the "Financing Agreements"). All
capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Financing Agreements unless indicated otherwise.

The Loan Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following to the end of
Section 3.1(A) INTEREST:

         "Notwithstanding the above, interest on any Prime Loan with a balance
         of less than zero at the end of any day, at a time when all loans in
         total are greater than zero, shall accrue at a fluctuating rate per
         annum equal to three percent (3%) below the Base Rate."

Except as expressly provided herein, all of the representations, warranties,
terms, covenants and conditions contained in the Financing Agreements shall
remain unamended and shall continue to be and shall remain in full force and
effect in accordance with their respective terms. The agreements set forth
herein shall be limited precisely as provided for herein and shall not be deemed
an amendment to or modification of any other term or provision of the Financing
Agreements.

Please indicate your agreement with the above by signing one of the enclosed
originals and returning it to the Lender's attention via express mail. This
agreement shall not be binding on the Lender until such time as a fully executed
original of this letter is received by the Lender.


Sincerely,


/s/ Timothy G. Johnson


Concur:  /s/ Theresa Carlise
National Record Mart, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PEREZ TOMAYO TULIO, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-120 Erie

v. )

)

JAMES SHERMAN, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on April 21, 2005,

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 11], filed on July

31, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be denied. The parties were allowed

ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on

Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondent. No objections were filed. After de novo

review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and

Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 11] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on July 31, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00120-SJM-SPB Document 12 Filed 08/18/06 Page 1 of 1