alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2796 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2796

To provide for the equitable settlement of certain Indian land disputes 
          regarding land in Illinois, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2023

  Mr. Mullin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the equitable settlement of certain Indian land disputes 
          regarding land in Illinois, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS.

    (a) Jurisdiction Conferred on the United States Court of Federal 
Claims.--
            (1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, the United States Court of Federal Claims shall have 
        jurisdiction to hear, determine, and render judgment on a land 
        claim of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma under its Treaty with the 
        United States of America signed at Grouseland August 21, 1805 
        (7 Stat. 91) (commonly known as the ``Treaty of Grouseland''), 
        without regard to the statute of limitations, including section 
        2501 of title 28, United States Code, and any delay-based 
        defense, no matter how characterized.
            (2) Jurisdiction expiration.--Not later than 1 year after 
        the date of enactment of this Act, the jurisdiction conferred 
        to the United States Court of Federal Claims under paragraph 
        (1) shall expire unless the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma files a 
        land claim under that paragraph.
    (b) Extinguishment of Title and Claims.--Except for a claim filed 
under subsection (a)(1), all other claims, including any and all future 
claims, of the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma, or any member, descendant, or 
predecessor in interest to the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma, to land in the 
State of Illinois are extinguished.
                                 <all>
```
PRIVATE LAW 105–7—NOV. 10, 1998

Private Law 105–7

105th Congress

An Act

For the relief of Mai Hoa ‘‘Jasmin’’ Salehi.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MAI HOA ‘‘JASMIN’’

SALEHI.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of

section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Mai Hoa

‘‘Jasmin’’ Salehi shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant

visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted

for permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance

of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment

of status to lawful permanent resident.

(b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Mai Hoa ‘‘Jasmin’’ Salehi enters

the United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection

(c), she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully

and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status

under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of

the date of the enactment of this Act.

(c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance

of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status

is filed with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of

the enactment of this Act.

(d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent residence to Mai Hoa

‘‘Jasmin’’ Salehi, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper

officer to reduce by 1, during the current or next following fiscal

year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made available

to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a)

of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total

number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives

of the country of the alien’s birth under section 202(e) of such

Act.

Approved November 10, 1998.

Nov. 10, 1998

[H.R. 1794]
Memorandum 

U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office at the Secretory 

at Transportation 

Subject: Essential Air Service at Clovis (DOT -OST -1996-1902) and 

Silver City. /Hurley/Dezing (D T-OST-1996-1903), 

Nlf' Mex~·co /() . 

;{_) JJY)1"'"-? , ;C/a c:· 

From: Dennis J. eVany, Chief 'i 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division, X-53 

To: Dockets Operations, M-30 

Date: August 24, 2012 

Reply to Brian Swanson, 

Attn. of: X-53 Ext. 65392 

By e-mail dated August 17, 2012, the Department requested that Clovis and 

Silver City/Hurley/Deming submit comments on the proposals received for Essential Air 

Service (EAS) at the two communities by September 10, 2012. On August 23, 2012, a 

representative from Silver City and Gr;:mt County (the owner and operator of the airport 

where EAS is provided) e-mailed the Department a request to extend the due date to 

submit comments and/or endorse a preferred proposal to October 4, 2012. In the 

extension request, the representative explained that due in part to the State of New 

Mexico's procedural requirements regarding public meetings, the evaluation of the 

proposals would not be completed by the due date established. 

The Department has decided to grant the extension for both Silver City/Hurley/Deming 

and Clovis because SeaPort Airlines, Inc. submitted inseparable package bids (serving 

both communities together) and Clovis does not object to the extension request. 

Comments from both communities should now be submitted no later than 

October 4, 2012. 

Attachment 
Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Subject: FW: Request for Extension of Time- OST -1996-1903 

-----Original Message-----

From: Robert L. Scavron [mailto:scavlaw@corncast.net] 

Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 3:41 PM 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Cc: scmayor@rnsn.corn; Alex C. Brown 

Subject: Re: Request for Extension ofTime- OST-1996-1903 

Dear Mr. Devany: The Town of Silver City and the County of Grant request an extension of time to comment upon the two proposals submitted to your office in 

Docket OST-1996-1903. The current date for submission of comments is September 10, 2012. The extended date herein requested is October 4, 2012. 

Thank you for your consideration. Robert L. Scavron, Town Attorney, Town of Silver City. 

>»Dear Mr. Swanson: On behalf of the Town of Silver City and the 

»> County of Grant, I am requesting an extension of time to comment 

»> upon the two proposals submitted to your office by Great Lakes 

>»Aviation and SeaPort Air. This request is necessitated ·by the needs 

»>of the respective governments to confer with due regard for 

»> procedural obligations under the State of New Mexico Open Meetings 

»>Act. Further, both the Town and County have proposed questions to 

»>one of the carriers, and intends to do the same with the other. We 

>»view this selection process as collaborative and cooperative, and 

»> having extra time to explore all options with the carriers will 

>>>benefit the process and the needs of our communities. Please respond 

»>at you earliest convenience. Thank you again for your direction and 

>>>assistance. Robert L. Scavron 

1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 190 (Wednesday, October 1, 1997)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 51367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26191]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 190 / Wednesday, October 1, 1997 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 51367]]

                Memorandum of August 5, 1997

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 803(a) of 
                the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997

                Memorandum for Director of Central Intelligence

                By virtue of the authority vested in me by the 
                Constitution and laws of the United States of America, 
                including section 301 of title 3 of the United States 
                Code, I hereby delegate the functions conferred upon 
                the President by section 803(a) of the Intelligence 
                Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997, 50 U.S.C. 
                section 404d, to the Director of Central Intelligence.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, August 5, 1997.

[FR Doc. 97-26191
Filed 9-30-97; 8:45 am]
Billing code 6310-02-M
#### CHAMPION MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant, v. John H. MILLER et al., Appellees.

No. 69-97.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 31, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 23, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 24
                                                 POWER OF ATTORNEY

        The undersigned officer and/or director of EMERGING ALPHA CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"),  hereby constitutes and appoints Jerry
W.  Jarrell  and  D.B.H.  Chaffe  III,  and each of  them,  with  full  power of
substitution and resubstitution,  as attorney to sign for the undersigned in any
and all capacities the  Corporation's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended March 31, 1998 and any and all amendments thereto, with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission and with full power and authority to do and perform any and
all  acts  and  things  whatsoever  required  and  necessary  to be  done in the
premises,  as fully to all intents and purposes as the  undersigned  could do if
personally  present.  The undersigned hereby ratifies and confirms all that said
attorney-in-fact  and  agent,  or any  of his  substitute  or  substitutes,  may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof and incorporate such changes as
any of the said attorneys-in-fact deems appropriate.


------------------------------
Burt H. Keenan

May 23, 1998
Case 06-23936-TPA Doc 61 Filed 12/13/06 Entered 12/13/06 12:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 15
Case 06-23936-TPA Doc 61 Filed 12/13/06 Entered 12/13/06 12:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 15
Case 06-23936-TPA Doc 61 Filed 12/13/06 Entered 12/13/06 12:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 15
Case 06-23936-TPA Doc 61 Filed 12/13/06 Entered 12/13/06 12:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 15
Case 06-23936-TPA Doc 61 Filed 12/13/06 Entered 12/13/06 12:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 15
Case 06-23936-TPA Doc 61 Filed 12/13/06 Entered 12/13/06 12:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 15
Case 06-23936-TPA Doc 61 Filed 12/13/06 Entered 12/13/06 12:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 15
Case 06-23936-TPA Doc 61 Filed 12/13/06 Entered 12/13/06 12:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 15
Case 06-23936-TPA Doc 61 Filed 12/13/06 Entered 12/13/06 12:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 15
Case 06-23936-TPA Doc 61 Filed 12/13/06 Entered 12/13/06 12:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 15
Case 06-23936-TPA Doc 61 Filed 12/13/06 Entered 12/13/06 12:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 11 of 15
Case 06-23936-TPA Doc 61 Filed 12/13/06 Entered 12/13/06 12:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 12 of 15
Case 06-23936-TPA Doc 61 Filed 12/13/06 Entered 12/13/06 12:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 13 of 15
Case 06-23936-TPA Doc 61 Filed 12/13/06 Entered 12/13/06 12:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 14 of 15
Case 06-23936-TPA Doc 61 Filed 12/13/06 Entered 12/13/06 12:33:48 Desc Main

Document Page 15 of 15
Exhibit 12


                              Matrix Bancorp, Inc.

                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                                   (Unaudited)

                             (Dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                        Year Ended December 31,
                                                     2002         2001           2000          1999          1998
                                                  -----------  ------------  ------------   ------------  ------------
<S>                                             <C>            <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>

A.   Matrix Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries
     (consolidated)
Earnings:
     1.  Income (loss) before income taxes ..   $    (8,269)   $   12,787    $    6,501     $   17,057    $   13,389
     2.  Plus interest expense (A) ..........        50,228        65,884        68,089         44,234        36,822
                                                  -----------  ------------  ------------   ------------  ------------
     3.  Earnings including interest on deposts      41,959        78,671        74,590         61,291        50,211
     4.  Less interest on deposits...........        21,496        34,872        26,275         21,589        16,221
                                                  -----------  ------------  ------------   ------------  ------------
     5.  Earnings excluding interest on
         deposits                               $    20,463    $   43,799    $   48,315     $   39,702    $   33,990
                                                  ===========  ============  ============   ============  ============
Fixed Charges:
     6. Including interest on deposits
          excluding capitalized interest ....   $    50,228    $   66,119    $   68,218     $   44,279    $   36,901
     7.  Less interest on deposits (Line 4) .        21,496        34,872        26,275         21,589        16,221
                                                  -----------  ------------  ------------   ------------  ------------
     8.  Excluding interest on deposits .....   $    28,732    $   31,247    $   41,943     $   22,690    $   20,680
                                                  ===========  ============  ============   ============  ============
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges:
           Including interest on deposits
           (Line 3 divided by Line 6) .......          0.84x         1.19x         1.09x          1.38x         1.36x
           Excluding interest on deposits
           (Line 5 divided by Line 8) .......          0.71x         1.40x         1.15x          1.75x         1.64x

------------
<FN>
(A) Includes amounts representing the estimated interest component of net rental
payments.
</FN>
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-111466, 333-111467, 333-111469 and 333-116114 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No.
333-122215 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 28, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of The DIRECTV Group, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entitiesan interpretation of ARB No. 51, and the change in method of accounting for subscriber acquisition, upgrade and retention costs) and managements report on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The DIRECTV Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|Deloitte & Touche LLP    



Los Angeles, California

February 28, 2005
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1



# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted August 26, 2022 * Decided September 7, 2022

Before

F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK , Circuit Judge

M ICHAEL B. B RENNAN , Circuit Judge

T HOMAS L. K IRSCH II
, Circuit Judge

No. 21-3259

U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA , Plaintiff-Appellee
,

v.

B RIAN B ROADFIELD , Defendant-Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois.

No. 13-CR-10055

Michael M. Mihm, Judge

.

O R D E R

Brian Broadfield contends that he has conditions that expose him to extra risk should he contract COVID-19, and he maintains that this should lead the district court to grant his motion for compassionate release.

He made such a contention before, and we rejected it on the merits. United States v. Broadfield , 5 F.4th 801 (7th Cir. 2021). Our decision observed that Broadfield, who refuses to accept vaccination, appears to be at no greater risk in prison than outside. We added that his stated reason, fear of allergic reaction, lacks medical support.

* We have unanimously agreed to decide the case without argument because the briefs and record adequately present the facts and legal arguments, and argument would not significantly aid the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(C).No. 21-3259 Page 2

Broadfield contends that our decision was mistaken and that we should direct the district court to ignore it. To the contrary, that decision is the law of the case, and no intervening developments call it into question. Broadfield still has not proffered evidence that allergies prevent him from being vaccinated (he has some allergies, but not the kind that the CDC says make vaccination inadvisable), and he has not offered any evidence suggesting that vaccinated persons with his medical conditions face greater risks from COVID-19 in prison than they would face outside. He therefore has not established an extraordinary and compelling reason for compassionate release.

A FFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2577]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 2508]


Advisory Committee on Religious Freedom Abroad; Meeting

    The Department of State announces a meeting of the Secretary of 
State's Advisory Committee on Religious Freedom Abroad on Thursday, 
February 13, 1997 at 10:00 a.m. in the Loy Henderson room at the U.S. 
Department of State, Washington, DC. The Advisory Committee will 
consider topics related to the promotion of freedom of religion. Topics 
for consideration could include: Assessing religious freedom abroad and 
instances of persecution, and assessing the role of religious 
institutions in promoting an atmosphere in which human rights and 
freedom of conscience can be enjoyed.
    For more information, contact Alexandra Arriaga, Executive 
Secretary, Advisory Committee on Religious Freedom Abroad, Bureau of 
Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, Department of State, Washington, DC 
20520, telephone: 647-1422.

    Dated: January 28, 1997.
John Shattuck,
Assistant Secretary of State Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and 
Labor, Chairman, Advisory Committee on Religious Freedom Abroad.
[FR Doc. 97-2577 Filed 1-29-97; 1:06 pm]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
#### John C. CONVERSE, Appellant, v. CITY OF SOUTH MIAMI, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-716.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 9, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 21, 1971.

*152Pallot, Poppell, Goodman & Shapo and Michael C. Slotnick, Miami, for appellant.

Allen Clements, Jr., Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and SWANN, JJ.

SWANN, Judge.

One of its residents, John C. Converse, sued the City of South Miami, Florida. He sought a declaration that two sections of the city zoning ordinance relating to home occupation licensing were so vague as to be void and invalid or that the City arbitrarily and discriminatorily refused to renew a home occupation license it had previously issued to him.

After a hearing the trial court found those sections of the ordinance valid and that the City had not discriminated in its enforcement of the ordinance against the plaintiff. He has properly appealed from that final judgment.

Plaintiff argues that the challenged sections of the ordinance do not set forth sufficiently specific standards *for renewal*of a home occupation license. An examination of the pertinent sections of the zoning ordinance reveals that it does contain sufficiently specific standards to govern the issuance of a license for a house occupation within the city. It also provides that such licenses are “renewable annually only by council action” and are granted to only one owner and are nontransferrable.

We hold the same standards apply to the renewal of this home occupation license as apply to the issuance of such license.

The charge that the City unlawfully discriminated against the plaintiff in failing to renew his home occupation license has been considered in light of the evidence in the record and is insufficient to warrant reversal. See City of Miami Beach v. State ex rel. Patrician Hotel, 145 Fla. 716, 200 So. 213 (1941); City of Miami Beach v. Lincoln Investments, Inc., Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 496; and City of of Miami v. Walker, Fla.App.1965, 169 So.2d 842.

The final judgment is

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In
connection with the Annual Report of Ezenia! Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Khoa D. Nguyen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

|Date: March 26, 2004 |  | /s/KHOA D. NGUYENKhoa D. Nguyen Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks