alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

IdentityTheft.gov

Identity Theft

What to know, What to do
Is someone using your personal or financial information to 

make purchases, get benefits, file taxes, or commit fraud? 

That’s identity theft. 

Visit IdentityTheft.gov to report identity 

theft and get a personal recovery plan.

The site provides detailed advice to help you fix problems 

caused by identity theft, along with the ability to:

• get a personal recovery plan that walks you

through each step

• update your plan and track your progress

• print pre-filled letters and forms to send to credit 

bureaus, businesses, and debt collectors

Go to IdentityTheft.gov and click “Get Started.”

There’s detailed advice for tax, medical, and child identity 

theft – plus over thirty other types of identity theft. No 

matter what type of identity theft you’ve experienced, the 

next page tells you what to do right away. You’ll find these 

steps – and a whole lot more – at IdentityTheft.gov.
What To Do Right Away

Step 1: Call the companies where you know fraud occurred.

☐ Call the fraud department. Explain that someone stole your identity. 

Ask them to close or freeze the accounts. Then, no one can add 

new charges unless you agree. 

☐ Change logins, passwords, and PINs for your accounts.

Step 2: Place a fraud alert and get your credit reports.

☐ To place a free fraud alert, contact one of the three credit bureaus. 

That company must tell the other two. 

• Experian.com/help

888-EXPERIAN (888-397-3742) 

• TransUnion.com/credit-help

888-909-8872

• Equifax.com/personal/credit-report-services

800-685-1111

Get updates at IdentityTheft.gov/creditbureaucontacts.

☐ Get your free credit reports from Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion. 

Go to annualcreditreport.com or call 1-877-322-8228. 

☐ Review your reports. Make note of any account or transaction you 

don’t recognize. This will help you report the theft to the FTC and 

the police. 

Step 3: Report identity theft to the FTC.

☐ Go to IdentityTheft.gov, and include as many details as possible. 

Based on the information you enter, IdentityTheft.gov will 

create your Identity Theft Report and recovery plan.
Go to IdentityTheft.gov for next steps.

Your next step might be closing accounts opened in 

your name, or reporting fraudulent charges to your 

credit card company. 

IdentityTheft.gov can help – no matter what your 

specific identity theft situation is.

September 2018

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

IdentityTheft.gov
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.51

To:   Standard Chartered Bank                      30th day of August 1996
      Hong Kong

                             LETTER OF UNDERTAKING
                             ---------------------

Dear Sirs,

         We refer to the banking facilities made, or to be made available by
Standard Chartered Bank ("the Bank") to Tarrant Company Ltd. ("the Company").

         In consideration of the Bank providing or continuing banking
facilities or other accommodation or services to the Company for so long as the
Bank may think fit, and as a continuing security for the payment and discharge
to the Bank on demand of all moneys, obligations and liabilities, whether
actual or contingent, now or at any time hereafter due, owing or incurred by
the Company to the Bank, we hereby undertake to:

*        i)      maintain minimum tangible net worth no less than
USD22,000,000.-; and


*        ii)     debt-to equity ratio not to exceed 2.0:1 at each audited
financial year end.  Defined as Total Liabilities (current and long term)
divided by Tangible Net Worth.


         For the purposes of this undertaking the net worth shall be the
aggregate of:

         (a)     the amount paid up or credited as paid up on the
         issued share capital and

         (b)     the amounts standing to the credit of the capital 
         and revenue reserves

         all as shown by the latest accounts but after making such adjustments
as the Bank considers appropriate (including deductions for any amount which is
attributable to intangible assets or which has been or is to be distributed to
its shareholders or is necessary to take account of any minority or other
interest in any other company).

             We further undertake that we will, promptly on becoming aware of
the same, notify the Bank of any circumstance which gives rise, or may give
rise, to the debt-to-equity ratio being over the figure and the net worth
falling below the figure as stated above.

             This letter of undertaking shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of Hong Kong and we hereby irrevocably submit to the
non-exclusive jurisdiction of the Hong Kong courts.

                                                Yours faithfully,
 
*        Undertakings  i) and ii                /s/ Mark B. Kristof       
         apply to consolidated amounts          ----------------------
         reported by Tarrant Apparel            signed by Mark B. Kristof
         Group ("TAGS").  The Company           a Director
         is a 100% subsidiary of TAGS.          for and on behalf of
                                                Tarrant Apparel Group
#### Henry S. KIRKPATRICK and Edith B. Kirkpatrick, his wife, Appellants, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, through its Department of Housing and Urban Development, a Municipal Corporation, and Duval Title and Abstract Company, a corporation, Appellees.

No. EE-97.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 23, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 22, 1977.

Tom C. Meers, Jacksonville, for appellants.

Dawson A. McQuaig, William Lee Allen and William L. Coalson, M. S. Dunay of Schneider, Dunay & Lee, Jacksonville, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The Kirkpatricks appeal a final judgment entered in their favor following an inverse condemnation action by them against the City. They raise several points, only one of which warrants special consideration, pertaining to the lower court's alleged error by refusing to allow them to introduce into evidence the assessed value of their property for tax purposes to rebut the City’s expert testimony as to its value, relying upon *Trad*v. *City of Jacksonville,*279 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973), which held tax assessments are admissible into evidence as admissions against interest of the condemning authority. We do not consider the point well taken. *Trad*dealt with a total taking so that the property assessment was relevant in considering the value of the entire parcel, including both land and improvements. Here the jury had for its consideration only the value of improvements, and the tax assessment was not broken down as to the value of both the land and the buildings.

Additionally we do not have before us the transcription of the trial proceedings. The only transcript included within the record pertains to the hearing following trial as to the amount of attorney fees to be awarded. Consequently we have no way of discovering from the record the specific reason why the trial court disallowed the proffered exhibit. It has been held in countless cases that an appellant may not present an error for appellate consideration on an incomplete record if the omitted matter might affect the determination of the error *546by the reviewing court. E. g., *Hodge v. State,*29 Fla. 500,10 So. 556 (1892); *Albritton v. State,*54 Fla. 6, 44 So. 745 (1907); *Nelson v. State,*85 So.2d 832 (Fla.1956).

AFFIRMED.

MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

BOYER, Acting C. J., concurring specially-

BOYER, Acting Chief Judge,

concurring specially.

I concur in affirmance for the reasons set forth in the concluding paragraph of the majority opinion. I do not agree that the *Trad*case is not here applicable.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2041 

To provide for the conveyance of a United States Fish and Wildlife Service 

administrative site to the city of Las Vegas, Nevada. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2005 

Mr. REID introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To provide for the conveyance of a United States Fish and 

Wildlife Service administrative site to the city of Las 

Vegas, Nevada. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ed Fountain Park Ex5 pansion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.—The term ‘‘admin9 istrative site’’ means the parcel of real property 

10 identified as ‘‘Lands to be Conveyed to the City of 
2 

•S 2041 IS

1 Las Vegas; approximately, 7.89 acres’’ on the map 

2 entitled ‘‘Ed Fountain Park Expansion’’ and dated 

3 November 1, 2005. 

4 (2) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the city of 

5 Las Vegas, Nevada. 

6 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

7 the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Di8 rector of the United States Fish and Wildlife Serv9 ice. 

10 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF UNITED STATES FISH AND WILD11 LIFE SERVICE ADMINISTRATIVE SITE, LAS 

12 VEGAS, NEVADA. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall convey to the 

14 City, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of 

15 the United States in and to the administrative site for use 

16 by the City— 

17 (1) as a park; or 

18 (2) for any other recreation or nonprofit-related 

19 purpose. 

20 (b) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—As a condition of 

21 the conveyance under subsection (a), the Secretary shall 

22 require that the City pay the administrative costs of the 

23 conveyance, including survey costs and any other costs as24 sociated with the conveyance. 

25 (c) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.— 
3 

•S 2041 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary determines 

2 that the City is not using the administrative site for 

3 a purpose described in paragraph (1) or (2) of sub4 section (a), all right, title, and interest of the City 

5 in and to the administrative site (including any im6 provements to the administrative site) shall revert, 

7 at the option of the Secretary, to the United States. 

8 (2) HEARING.—Any determination of the Sec9 retary with respect to a reversion under paragraph 

10 (1) shall be made— 

11 (A) on the record; and 

12 (B) after an opportunity for a hearing. 

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(d)

                                 INTERTAN, INC.
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


                                                          Date: November 1, 2001

                        ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PLAN AGREEMENT


To:  JEFFREY A. LOSCH

     As stipulated in section 2 of your plan agreement dated February 18, 2000
(the "Plan Agreement"), the Plan Benefit Amount as defined in the Deferred
Compensation Plan (the "Plan") may be amended from time to time by the execution
by you and InterTAN, Inc. of an addendum instrument that states the changed
amount of the Plan Benefit Amount and the date of such change.

     Accordingly, effective the date hereof, the Plan Benefit Amount as set out
in the Plan Agreement is hereby changed to CDN $1,250,000.

     All other terms and conditions of the Plan and Plan Agreement remain
unamended. Any capitalized terms used herein that are not specifically defined
shall have the meaning attributed to them in the Plan.

     Please signify your acceptance of this change to your Plan Benefit Amount
by signing and returning the enclosed copy of this Addendum to myself or the
General Counsel of InterTAN, Inc. on or before thirty (30) days from the date
hereof. If you do not sign and return such copy within the above time period,
then the Plan Benefit Amount shall remain unchanged.

                                          Yours very truly,

                                          INTERTAN, INC.



                                          By:  /s/ Brian E. Levy
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Brian E. Levy
                                             President & Chief Executive Officer


ACCEPTED THIS 12/th/ day of November, 2001.


/s/ Jeffrey A. Losch
--------------------
Jeffrey A. Losch
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

                                PROMISSORY NOTE
                                ---------------

$13,966.07                                                     February 27, 1997


       FOR VALUE RECEIVED, George J. Pedersen, 700 Potomac Knolls Drive, McLean,
VA 22101, promises to pay to the order of ManTech International Corporation on
demand as the holder of this note or at such other place as the holder of this
note might from time to time designate in writing, the principal sum of Thirteen
Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty-Six Dollars and 07/100 ($13,966.07), plus interest
on the principal balance. Interest at the rate of eight (8) percent will be
calculated on an annual basis and deducted from Pedersen paycheck each
payperiod. At present ManTech's systems provides for 26 paychecks per year. The
interest rate may be adjusted from time to time by Phoenix Home Life Mutual
Insurance Company and Pedersen note will be adjusted accordingly.

        1.  This note may be fully or partially prepaid at any time without
penalty.

        2.  If the undersigned defaults in the payment of any installment due
under this note and fails to cure such default within thirty (30) days after the
holder of this note has sent written notice of default, then, at the option of
the holder of this note, the entire principal balance of this note and all
accrued and unpaid interest shall at once become due. Failure to exercise this
option shall not constitute a waiver of the right to exercise the same in the
event of any subsequent default.

        3.  The undersigned promises to pay all costs of collection, including
reasonable attorneys' fees, upon default in the payment of the principal or
interest of this note when due, whether suit is brought or not.

        4. In the event any one or more of the provisions contained in this note
is held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable for any reason, such invalidity,
illegality or unenforceability is not to affect any other provision of the note;
this note is to be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable
provision had never been a part of it.

        5.  This note may not be changed orally but only by an agreement in
writing and signed by the party against whom agreement enforcement of any
change is sought.

        6.  The note is to be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the
Commonwealth of Virginia.

ATTEST:                                   NAME

/s/ JoAnn J. Free                         /s/ George J. Pedersen
------------------------------           ---------------------------------
                                         George J. Pedersen
                                         Chairman of the Board
##### 



Exhibit 10.32

Summary of Employee Incentive Programs

Management Level Employees

The Company provided a program for incentive compensation for management
employees. The program provided for payments to be made as a percentage of
base compensation, based on performance by the Company relative to criteria
established and weighted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. Those criteria were based on measurements of the Companys
performance deemed to be relevant to manager level employees on a broad scale,
and to a level of performance deemed to be attainable, indicative of corporate
accomplishment, and likely to lead to corporate success. These included
operational criteria and sometimes included corporate financial performance.
Operational criteria (such as completion factor, on-time performance, etc.)
were designed to target performance levels deemed to be desirable, and will
generally be similar to criteria used to establish bonus plans for non-exempt
(hourly) employees. Two or more levels of participation were used at times to
reflect different levels of participation for various levels of management.
Frequency of payment were determined by the Compensation Committee.

The Company does not intend to resume its prior incentive compensation program
but does intend to provide incentive-based compensation for non-management
employees in the future, and is presently evaluating the terms under which it
will do so.

Non-Management Employees

The Company provided a program for incentive compensation for non-management
employees. This program was suspended in April 2003. The program provided for
payments to be made on a lump sum basis for achievement by the Company of
specific performance targets relative to criteria established and weighted by
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Those criteria were
based on measurements of the Companys performance deemed to be relevant to
employees generally, and to a level of performance that was deemed to be
attainable, indicative of corporate accomplishment, and likely to lead to
corporate success, at times including operational criteria and/or corporate
financial performance. Operational criteria (such as completion factor,
on-time performance, etc.) were designed to target performance levels deemed to
be desirable, and were generally similar to criteria used for incentive
compensation for management employees. Participation was
based on minimum hours and length of tenure, as established by the Compensation
Committee.

The Company does not intend to resume its prior incentive compensation program
for non-management employees but does intend to provide incentive-based
compensation for non-management employees in the future. The Company is
presently evaluating such aspects as performance objectives, levels of
participation, frequency of payment, and eligibility.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02346]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCTIC RESEARCH COMMISSION

103rd Commission Meeting

January 29, 2015.
    Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Arctic Research Commission 
will hold its 103rd meeting in Washington, District of Columbia, on 
March 4-5, 2015. The business sessions, open to the public, will 
convene at 9:00 a.m.
    The Agenda items include:
(1) Call to order and approval of the agenda
(2) Approval of the minutes from the 102nd meeting
(3) Commissioners and staff reports
(4) Discussion and presentations concerning Arctic research activities.
    The focus of the meeting will be on Arctic policy issues, and on 
programs and research projects affecting the Arctic.
    If you plan to attend this meeting, please notify us via the 
contact information below. Any person planning to attend who requires 
special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign 
language interpreters, must inform the Commission of those needs in 
advance of the meeting.
    Contact person for further information: John Farrell, Executive 
Director, U.S. Arctic Research Commission, 703-525-0111 or TDD 703-306-
0090.

Kathy Farrow,
Communications Specialist.
[FR Doc. 2015-02346 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

### **CONSENTOF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-91548, 333-64732, and333-60076, 333-104678 and 333-104679) and in the related Prospectuses and theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-91544, 333-64166, 333-90489, and333-42803) of VCampus Corporation of our report dated March 14, 2003, exceptfor Note 17, as to which the date is March 28, 2003, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and schedule of VCampus Corporation includedin this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, as amended, for the year ended December31, 2002.

 

| /s/ ERNST & YOUNG  LLP |
|----------------------------|

McLean, Virginia

July8, 2003

 

----
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. William Gilbert DEMERRIT, Appellee.

No. 69-946.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 2, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
                                                                    ------------



                   Report and Consent of Independent Auditors



To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of TranSwitch Corporation:

The audits referred to in our report dated January 18, 2001 included the related
financial statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2000, included in the TranSwitch Corporation 2000 Annual
Report on Form 10-K.  This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this
financial statement schedule based on our audits.  In our opinion, such
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.

We consent to the use of our reports included herein and incorporated by
reference in the Registration Statements of TranSwitch Corporation on Form S-3
(Nos. 333-56740,333-49980, 333-44040, 333-38318, 333-69005, 333-54368 and 333-
40897) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-44032, 333-83187 and 333-94324) relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of TranSwitch Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related financial statement
schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000,
which reports appear in the TranSwitch Corporation 2000 Annual Report on Form
10-K.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Stamford, Connecticut
March 30, 2001
| **INTEGRITY MUTUAL FUNDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES** | Exhibit 32.1 |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------------|

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. (the “Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert E. Walstad, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| Date:  March 28, 2005 | By /s/ Robert E. Walstad   |
|----------------------------|----------------------------|
|                       | -------------------------- |
|                       | Robert E. Walstad          |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer,   |
|                       | Chairman, and Director     |