Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 8, 2013 / Notices 26773 

Types (Renewal); 40 CFR 264.11, 

264.19, 264.28, 264.57, 264.113(e), 

264.191, 264.192(g), 264.193(i), 

264.196, 264.197(b), 264.222(b), 

264.223(b) and (c), 264.226(c), 

264.226(d), 264.227, 264.252(b), 

264.253(b) and (c), 264.254, 

264.276, 264.278(a)–(f) and (h), 

264.278(g), 264.302(b), 264.303(b), 

264.304(b) and (c), 264.314, 

264.343, 264.347, 264.571, 264.573, 

264.574, 264.603, 264.1033(j), 

264.1034–264.1036, 264.1061, 

264.1062–264.1065, 264.1101, 

265.11, 265.19, 265.26, 265.34, 

265.44, 265.113(e), 265.191– 

265.193, 265.196, 265.197(b), 

265.221, 265.222, 265.223, 265.225, 

265.226, 265.229, 265.254, 265.255, 

265.259, 265.276, 265.278, 265.28, 

265.301, 265.302, 265.303, 265.304, 

265.314, 265.352, 265.383, 265.404, 

265.441, 265.443, 265.444, 

265.1033–265.1035, 265.1061– 

265.1064, 265.1101, and 266.70(c); 

was approved on 04/12/2013; OMB 

Number 2050–0050; expires on 04/ 

30/2016; Approved with change. 

EPA ICR Number 2478.01; Federal 

Implementation Plan for Oil and 

Natural Gas Well Production 

Facilities; Fort Berthold Indian 

Reservation (Mandan, Hidatsa, and 

Arikara Nation), North Dakota 

(Final Rule); 40 CFR 49.4161; was 

approved on 04/12/2013; OMB 

Number 2008–0001; expires on 04/ 

30/2016; Approved without change. 

EPA ICR Number 2046.07; NESHAP for 

Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants; 

40 CFR part 63 subparts A and IIIII; 

was approved on 04/15/2013; OMB 

Number 2060–0542; expires on 04/ 

30/2016; Approved without change. 

EPA ICR Number 2219.04; Tips and 

Complaints Regarding 

Environmental Violations 

(Renewal); was approved on 04/15/ 

2013; OMB Number 2020–0032; 

expires on 04/30/2016; Approved 

without change. 

EPA ICR Number 2240.04; NESHAP for 

Area Sources: Polyvinyl Chloride 

and Copolymer Production, Primary 

Copper Smelting, Secondary 

Copper Smelting, and Primary 

Nonferrous Metals—Zinc, 

Cadmium, and Beryllium 

(Renewal); 40 CFR part 63 subparts 

A, DDDDDD, EEEEEE, FFFFFF and 

GGGGGG; was approved on 04/15/ 

2013; OMB Number 2060–0596; 

expires on 04/30/2016; Approved 

without change. 

EPA ICR Number 2354.03; NESHAP for 

Prepared Feeds Manufacturing; 40 

CFR part 63 subparts A and 

DDDDDDD; was approved on 04/ 

15/2013; OMB Number 2060–0635; 

expires on 04/30/2016; Approved 

without change. 

EPA ICR Number 2014.05; Reporting 

and Recordkeeping Requirements of 

the HCFC Allowance System 

(Renewal); 40 CFR part 82 subpart 

A; was approved on 04/18/2013; 

OMB Number 2060–0498; expires 

on 04/30/2016; Approved without 

change. 

EPA ICR Number 1797.06; NSPS for 

Standards of Performance for 

Storage Vessels for Petroleum 

Liquids for which Construction, 

Reconstruction or Modification 

Commenced after June 11, 1973, 

and prior to May 19, 1978 

(Renewal); 40 CFR part 60 subparts 

A and K; was approved on 04/19/ 

2013; OMB Number 2060–0442; 

expires on 04/30/2016; Approved 

without change. 

EPA ICR Number 2098.06; NESHAP for 

Primary Magnesium Refining; 40 

CFR part 63 subparts A and TTTTT; 

was approved on 04/19/2013; OMB 

Number 2060–0536; expires on 04/ 

30/2016; Approved without change. 

EPA ICR Number 2356.03; NESHAP for 

Chemical Preparations Industry; 40 

CFR part 63 subparts A and 

BBBBBBB; was approved on 04/19/ 

2013; OMB Number 2060–0636; 

expires on 04/30/2016; Approved 

without change. 

EPA ICR Number 1739.07; NESHAP for 

the Printing and Publishing 

Industry; 40 CFR part 63 subparts A 

and KK; was approved on 04/19/ 

2013; OMB Number 2060–0335; 

expires on 04/30/2016; Approved 

without change. 

Withdrawn and Continue 

EPA ICR Number 1487.11; Consolidated 

Superfund Information Collection 

Request (Renewal); Withdrawn 

from OMB on 04/10/2013 EPA ICR 

Number 2434.15; Generic Clearance 

for the Collection of Qualitative 

Feedback on Agency Service 

Delivery (New); Withdrawn from 

OMB on 04/30/2013 

John Moses, 

Director, Collections Strategies Division. 

[FR Doc. 2013–10883 Filed 5–7–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–ORD–2013–0282; FRL–9810–6] 

Proposed Information Collection 

Request; Comment Request; 

Willingness To Pay Survey for Santa 

Cruz River Management Options in 

Southern Arizona 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency is planning to submit an 

information collection request (ICR), 

‘‘Willingness To Pay Survey for Santa 

Cruz River Management Options in 

Southern Arizona’’ (EPA ICR No. 

2484.01, OMB Control No. 2080–NEW) 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

Before doing so, EPA is soliciting public 

comments on specific aspects of the 

proposed information collection as 

described below. This is a request for 

approval of a new collection. An 

Agency may not conduct or sponsor and 

a person is not required to respond to 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid OMB control 

number. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before July 8, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

ORD–2013–0282 online using 

www.regulations.gov (our preferred 

method), or by mail to: EPA Docket 

Center, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460. 

EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes profanity, threats, 

information claimed to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Matthew A. Weber, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Western Ecology 

Division, 200 SW. 35th St., Corvallis, 

OR 97333; telephone number: 541–754– 

4315; fax number: 541–754–4799; email 

address: weber.matthew@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Supporting documents which explain in 

detail the information that the EPA will 

be collecting are available in the public 

docket for this ICR. The docket can be 

viewed online at www.regulations.gov 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

26774 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 8, 2013 / Notices 

or in person at the EPA Docket Center, 

EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC. The telephone number for the 

Docket Center is 202–566–1744. For 

additional information about EPA’s 

public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/ 

dockets. 

Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of 

the PRA, EPA is soliciting comments 

and information to enable it to: (i) 

Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; (ii) evaluate the 

accuracy of the Agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information, including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions used; 

(iii) enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (iv) minimize the burden 

of the collection of information on those 

who are to respond, including through 

the use of appropriate automated 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. EPA will consider the 

comments received and amend the ICR 

as appropriate. The final ICR package 

will then be submitted to OMB for 

review and approval. At that time, EPA 

will issue another Federal Register 

notice to announce the submission of 

the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to 

submit additional comments to OMB. 

Abstract: The USEPA Office of 

Research and Development is 

investigating public values for scenarios 

of change for perennial reaches of the 

effluent-dominated Santa Cruz River, 

Arizona. These values will be estimated 

via a willingness to pay mail survey 

instrument. There are two effluentdominated perennial reaches considered 

in the survey. A ‘‘South’’ reach starts at 

an outfall in Rio Rico, AZ, and flows 

northward through Tumaca ́cori National 

Historical Park. A ‘‘North’’ reach is fed 

by two outfalls in northwest Tucson, 

Arizona, flows northwest through 

Marana, AZ. For each of the South and 

North reaches, two different scenarios of 

change are considered. The first is a 

reduction in flow length, and associated 

decreases in cottonwood-willow 

riparian forest, a rare forest type in the 

region. The second is an increase in 

water quality to allow full contact 

recreation, such as submersion, at 

normal flow levels. The baseline flow 

length and forest acreages, as well as the 

acreages of forest that would be 

associated with reduced flow lengths, 

are derived from natural science 

research. For the survey, a choice 

experiment framework is used with 

statistically designed tradeoff questions. 

Options to maintain flow length and 

forest, or increase effluent water quality, 

are posed as increases in a yearly 

household tax. Each choice question 

allows a zero cost ‘‘opt out’’ option. The 

choice experiment is designed to allow 

isolation of the public value of each 

marginal change for each reach. A few 

additional questions to further 

understand respondent choice 

motivations, as well as their riverrelated recreation behavior, are also 

included. Several pages of background 

introduce the issue to respondents. A 

small number of sociodemographic 

questions are included to gauge how 

well the sample respondents represent 

the target population. Samples of the 

two major metropolitan areas in 

southern Arizona, Phoenix and Tucson, 

will receive the survey. The primary 

reason for the survey is public value 

research. The Santa Cruz River is a case 

study of a waterway highly impacted by 

human modifications. However it still 

represents potentially valuable 

ecological commodities such as rare 

riparian habitat and recreational 

opportunities for the regional 

population. The survey results may also 

be informative to local decision-makers 

considering Santa Cruz River 

management options. Water scarcity in 

the region raises periodic debates on the 

best uses of effluent. All survey 

responses will be kept confidential. 

Form Numbers: None. 

Respondents/affected entities: The 

target respondents for this survey are 

representatives 18 yrs or older of 

households in the two most populated 

urban areas of Arizona, the Phoenix 

metro area, and the Tucson metro area. 

A sample of household representatives 

18 yrs or older in each metro area will 

be contacted by mail following multiple 

contact protocol in Dillman (2009). A 

response rate of 30% will be targeted. 

To increase response rates from the 

sample, several contacts will be used, 

including a prenotice to all recipients, a 

reminder postcard, and followup 

mailing as needed. 

Respondent’s obligation to respond: 

Voluntary. 

Estimated number of respondents: 

The target responses from the Phoenix 

and Tucson metro areas is 250 

households each, or 500 households 

total. 

Frequency of response: One-time 

response. 

Total estimated burden: For a typical 

respondent, a conservative estimate of 

their time to review and respond to 

survey questions is 30 minutes. 

Assuming the target of 500 people total 

respond to the survey, the burden is 250 

hours. 

Total estimated cost: The Bureau of 

Labor Statistics reports average wage 

rates for some metropolitan areas, with 

the most recent data being May 2011 

(Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2011). The 

average hourly wage for all occupations 

in the Phoenix metro area was $21.61, 

or an average cost per participant of 

$10.81. The average hourly wage for all 

occupations in the Tucson metro area 

was $20.55, or an average cost per 

participant of $10.28. Assuming 250 

participants in each metro area fill out 

the survey, the total estimated 

respondent labor cost is $5,270. This 

would be a one-time expenditure of 

their time. 

Changes in Estimates: This is the first 

notice, there is no change in estimates 

at this time. 

Dated: April 19, 2013. 

Thomas Fontaine III, 

Western Ecology Division Director. 

[FR Doc. 2013–10932 Filed 5–7–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OECA–2012–0658; FRL–9530–9] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to OMB for 

Review and Approval; Comment 

Request; NSPS/NESHAP for Wool 

Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing 

Plants (Renewal) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq.), this document announces 

that an Information Collection Request 

(ICR) has been forwarded to the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval. This is a request 

to renew an existing approved 

collection. The ICR which is abstracted 

below describes the nature of the 

collection and the estimated burden and 

cost. 

DATES: Additional comments may be 

submitted on or before June 7, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OECA–2012–0658, to: (1) EPA online, 

using www.regulations.gov (our 

preferred method), or by email to: 

docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Enforcement and 

Compliance Docket and Information 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES