alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Magtron  International  Corp.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Theodore S. Li, Chief Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Theodore S. Li
----------------------------------
Theodore S. Li
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2003

This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Charles Lowell MERRILL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-889.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 22, 1969.

*437Jack R. Nageley and Harvey S. Swickle, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and SWANN, JJ.

HENDRY, Judge.

The defendant, Charles Lowell Merrill, . was charged by information with one count of operating a gambling *room*and five counts of bookmaking. He was found guilty of a felony charged in the first count and a misdemeanor under each of the other five counts.

As to the felony conviction, the defendant was sentenced to a fine of $3,000.00 or to serve a term of three years in the State Penitentiary. He was sentenced on the misdemeanor convictions to serve one day in the Dade County Jail, with credit to be given for the time served in jail prior to sentencing. Defendant paid the fine imposed under the felony conviction.

An appeal has been filed in this court by the defendant from the judgment and sentence imposed under each of the counts.

The state has moved to dismiss this appeal in its entirety on the ground that the appeal has been rendered moot by payment of the fine imposed upon defendant. In support of this position, the state cites the United States Supreme Court case of St. Pierre v. United States, 319 U.S. 41, 63 S.Ct. 910, 87 L.Ed. 1199 (1943). We do not find the St. Pierre case to be authority for a dismissal of the instant appeal. Therefore, we cannot agree with the state’s contention and deny the motion to dismiss this appeal. The state has moved in the alternative that the appeal, as it relates to the misdemeanor counts, be transferred to the circuit court, the court having jurisdiction of appeals from convictions of misdemeanors. The motion is well taken. Convictions on misdemeanor counts are reviewable by the Circuit Court of Dade County, pursuant to Article V, §§ (5) and (6) of the Constitution of the State of Florida, F.S.A.; and under authority of Rule 2.1, Subd. (a) (5) (d), Florida Appellate Rules 32 F.S.A. This appeal, insofar as it is concerned with the misdemeanor convictions, will, after our decision on the felony appeal, be transferred to the Circuit Court of Dade County by a separate order. See Christian v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 561; Troise v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 24.

Motion to dismiss denied; motion to transfer that portion of the appeal relating to misdemeanor convictions is granted.
# Euroopa Liidu C 104I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 104I |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 64. aastakäik26. märts 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 104I

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

64. aastakäik26. märts 2021

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Teave |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT |
| | Euroopa Komisjon |
| 2021/C 104 I/01 | Euroopa Liidu kombineeritud nomenklatuuri selgitavad märkused | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

2021/C 104 I/01

Euroopa Liidu kombineeritud nomenklatuuri selgitavad märkused

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

| 26.3.2021 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CI 104/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2021

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CI 104/1

---

Euroopa Liidu kombineeritud nomenklatuuri selgitavad märkused

(2021/C 104 I/01)

Vastavalt nõukogu määruse (EMÜ) nr 2658/87 (1) artikli 9 lõike 1 punktile a muudetakse Euroopa Liidu kombineeritud nomenklatuuri selgitavaid märkusi (2) järgmiselt.

Leheküljel 369

jäetakse välja alamrubriigi 8543 70 90 selgitava märkuse teine lõige.

Leheküljel 416

jäetakse välja alamrubriigi 9506 69 90 selgitava märkuse teine ja kolmas lõige ning asendatakse järgmisega:

„Sellesse alamrubriiki ei kuulu siiski nn stressipallid, mis on pallikujulised ja võivad olla erinevalt kaunistatud. Need on tavaliselt tehtud plastist või kummist ja kavandatud selleks, et korduvalt käes pigistades teha stressivähendamisharjutusi. „Stressipallid“ ning samalaadsed eri kuju ja mustriga „stressitooted“ klassifitseeritakse rubriiki 9503.“

---

(1)  Nõukogu 23. juuli 1987. aasta määrus (EMÜ) nr 2658/87 tariifi- ja statistikanomenklatuuri ning ühise tollitariifistiku kohta (EÜT L 256, 7.9.1987, lk 1).

(2)  ELT C 119, 29.3.2019, lk 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25811]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. OA96-67-003]


Montaup Electric Company; Notice of Filing

September 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, Montaup Electric Company 
tendered for filing Revised sheets Nos. 45, 59 and 50 to its open 
access transmission filing in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before October, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25811 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WARREN DURHAM, JR., )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) C.A. No. 04-198 Erie

)

CITY AND COUNTY OF ERIE, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on 

July 16, 2004 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise

Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation, filed on July 25,

2005, recommended that the motion to dismiss filed on behalf of Defendants the

Honorable Fred P. Anthony, the Honorable Shad Connelly, and the Erie County Court

of Common Pleas [Doc. # 18] be granted and that the motion to dismiss filed on behalf

of Defendants City and County of Erie and Kevin Kallenbach, Esq. [Doc. # 28] also be

granted. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file

objections. Plaintiff filed his objections on August 9, 2005 and a response was filed by

Defendants City and County of Erie and Kevin Kallenbach, Esq. on August 15, 2005.

After de novo review of the Complaint and the documents in the case, together

with the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff’s objections and the Defendants’

response thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 17th Day of August 2005, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

the motion to dismiss filed on behalf of Defendants the Honorable Fred P. Anthony, the

Honorable Shad Connelly, and the Erie County Court of Common Pleas [Doc. # 18] be

Case 1:04-cv-00198-SJM-SPB Document 40 Filed 08/17/05 Page 1 of 2
GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss filed on behalf of

Defendants City and County of Erie and Kevin Kallenbach, Esq. [Doc. # 28] is

GRANTED. 

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter dated July

25, 2005 is adopted as the opinion of this Court. The Clerk is directed to mark this case

“CLOSED.”

s/ Sean J. McLaughlin 

United States District Judge

cc: all parties of record 

Case 1:04-cv-00198-SJM-SPB Document 40 Filed 08/17/05 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2887 

To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to require the 

acceptance of cash payments for entrance fees at units of the National 

Park System. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 

Ms. LUMMIS (for herself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. RISCH, Mrs. 

CAPITO, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. CRAMER, and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act 

to require the acceptance of cash payments for entrance 

fees at units of the National Park System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Access to 

5 Recreation with Cash Act’’ or the ‘‘PARC Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2887 IS

1 SEC. 2. ACCEPTANCE OF CASH PAYMENTS FOR ENTRANCE 

2 FEES AT UNITS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYS3 TEM. 

4 Section 803(e) of the Federal Lands Recreation En5 hancement Act (16 U.S.C. 6802(e)) is amended by adding 

6 at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(3) ACCEPTANCE OF CASH PAYMENTS RE8 QUIRED.—The Secretary of the Interior shall require 

9 that any unit of the National Park System at which 

10 an entrance fee is charged in accordance with para11 graph (1) accept cash as a form of payment for the 

12 entrance fee.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
:'A,~-20iO-I\iD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization

Natii)ll~l Bll~il1e.ss Airrrarl ,,"~SJ)d'l(i'oll

... 'I

Regional Airlilll' AS'!:tlr.:illlioll

Aircraft OWllers & Pilots Association

ATA

Person Contacted

Eli coIn

Dave LoltCrt'r

Rubert J-1ackm;11l

Craig F:lbiall

Date Response

-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EDWARD EARL THOMAS, )

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) Civil Action No. 04-343 ERIE

)

COMMONWEALTH OF PA )

Respondent. )

)

ORDER

AND NOW this 23rd day of June, 2006, after consideration of the Petitioner’s 

Motion to Proceed in Pro Se, which the Court construes as a Motion to Proceed In Forma 

Pauperis (Document No. 7)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the said motions is DENIED AS MOOT

 

 S/Sean J. McLaughlin 

Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cc: counsel/parties of record NK 

Case 1:04-cv-00343-SJM-SPB Document 8 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 1
#### Thomas Leroy LUMLEY, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 38767.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1, 1969.

Thomas Leroy Lumley, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James Robert Yon, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent having filed a response to the order directing him to show lawful cause for the detention and imprisonment of Petitioner, and it appearing Petitioner fails *195to demonstrate within the meaning and requirements of Schaeffer v. Wainwright (Fla. 1969), 218 So.2d 442, and Powe v. State (Fla. 1968), 216 So.2d 446, the potential existence of those facts necessary to charge the State with the duty of advising Petitioner and providing him with the assistance of counsel for the purpose of directly appealing his judgment of conviction, the writ of habeas corpus is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., concur.
#### Gennero GALTIERI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-414.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 1, 1970.

Rehearing Denied April 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal quashed.
Exhibit 4.1
                           SPECIMEN STOCK CERTIFICATE

                                   Certificate


      NUMBER                                                            SHARES
   [SPECIMEN]                                                            -0-
---------------                                                       ---------

                      ROYAL CASKET DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION
                               Florida Corporation


    100,000,000 Shares of Common Stock Authorized - Par value $.001 per share

This Certifies that
is hereby issued VOTING COMMON STOCK fully paid and non-assessable Shares of the
Capital Stock of the above named Corporation transferable only on the books of
the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney
upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
        signed by its duly authorized officer(s) this
                          day of           ,
        ------------------       -----------


[S E A L]



                --------------------   --------------------
                   President                Secretary
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of TranSwitch Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Santanu Das, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



/s/    DR. SANTANU
DASDr. Santanu Das President and Chief Executive Officer




March 03, 2004
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                        |                                                                                                                                                                                           |         |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|
|                   |                                                                                                                                                                                      |    |
| May                15, 2007 |                                                                                                                                                                                                |              |
|                        | Zhenggang                  WangChairman                  of the Board & Chief                    Executive Officer (Principal                      Executive                      Officer) |

|                        |                                                                                                              |         |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|
|                   |                                                                                                         |    |
| May                15, 2007 |                                                                                                                   |              |
|                        | Jian                Liu Chief                  Financial Officer (Principal                    Financial Officer) |

----
----- Forwarded by Zachary Pekar/RTP/USEPA/US on 10/15/2012 12:28 PM

-----

From: Zachary Pekar/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Michelle Bell <michelle.bell@yale.edu>

Cc: Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Francesca Dominici <FDOMINIC@hsph.harvard.edu>

Date: 12/20/2011 01:45 PM

Subject: Re: 8

- hr Bayesian estimates

Michelle

- one follow

- up item to verify regarding the city

- specific Bayes

- adjusted estimates. I would

assume that you would be providing the estimates along with confidence intervals. Let me know if that

assumption is incorrect and thanks again for jumping in on this so quickly!

zach

Zachary Pekar, MSPH, PhD

Human Health Risk Assessment

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

tele: (919) 541

- 3704

e

- m ail: pekar.zachary@epa.gov

From: Michelle Bell <michelle.bell@yale.edu>

To: Zachary Pekar/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Francesca Dominici <FDOMINIC@hsph.harvard.edu>

Date: 12/19/2011 08:45 PM

Subject: 8

- hr Bayesian estimates

Dear Bryan and Zach:

I'm writing to give you an update that it is going to be doable to

give EPA the 8

- hour Bayesian estimates, and that I'll be doing the analysis.

Francesca, I'll keep you posted.

Best,

Michelle
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Wages and Related Benefits: 40 Labor Markets, 1951-1952

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Wages and Related Benefits: 40 Labor Markets, 1951-1952 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1113*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1952,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4444,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Objective Communications, Inc. (a development stage enterprise) on Form S-3
(File No. 333-20625), Form S-8 (File No. 333-49763) and Form S-8 (File No.
333-49765) of our report, which includes an explanatory paragraph on the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern, dated February 26, 1999, on
our audits of the financial statements of Objective Communications, Inc. as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996 and for the period October 5, 1993 (date of inception) to December 31,
1998, which report is included in Objective Communications, Inc. Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB.



                                                      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 31, 1999
Exhibit
32.1





WRITTEN
STATEMENT


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with this Quarterly Report of China 3C Group and its subsidiaries
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned, Zhenggang Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




November  16,
2009







/s/ Zhenggang Wang


Zhenggang
Wang


Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman


(Principal
Executive Officer)
In the matter of: 

Federal Aviation 

Administration, 

V. 

BRIAN WALLAESA 

BRIAN A WALLAESA 

Complainant 

Respondent. 

''mum OF 

:v^PORTATION 

:C ' 0 '^^ 2: ! b 

FDMS No. FAA-2010-0628 

CaseNo. 2010WP190018 

Hon. Ronnie A. Yoder 

Motion for Extension of Time 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.44, the Respondent respectfully moves this Court for 

an extension of time concerning the December 6, 2010 deadline for submission of 

exhibits and discovery. In support of this motion the Respondent states as follows: 

1. The Respondent is due to appear in Court in Las Vegas, NV on December 

14,2010. 

2. The Respondent is expected to have time to prepare for the federal trial 

that is expected on previously mentioned date and time. 

3. The Respondent has worked with the lawyer in the aforementioned trial 

and is expected to travel to Las Vegas on during December 6, 2010 to 

prepare for the upcoming trial. 

4. The original trial date had been moved without the full consent of the 

Respondent following the September 20, 2010 filing, notably on 

November 6, 2010. 
WHEREFORE, the Respondent respectfully requests that this Court grant an extension of 

time from December 6, 2010 to January 10, 2011. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

'aiiaesa 

Respondent 

11272 Wortham Crest Circle 

Manassas, VA 20109 

(570) 778-1335 

Dated November 15, 2010