76258 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 235 / Tuesday, December 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or removed from Regulations.gov. 

The EPA may publish any comment 

received to its public docket. Do not 

submit electronically any information 

you consider to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Multimedia 

submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be 

accompanied by a written comment. 

The written comment is considered the 

official comment and should include 

discussion of all points you wish to 

make. The EPA will generally not 

consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 

additional submission methods, the full 

EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415) 

972–3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. This 

proposal addresses the following local 

rules: SCAQMD Rule 1151,‘‘Motor 

Vehicle and Mobile Equipment NonAssembly Line Coating Operations,’’ 

and YSAQMD Rule 2.26, ‘‘Motor 

Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating 

Operations’’. In the Rules and 

Regulations section of this Federal 

Register, we are approving these local 

rules in a direct final action without 

prior proposal because we believe these 

SIP revisions are not controversial. If we 

receive adverse comments, however, we 

will publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule and address the 

comments in subsequent action based 

on this proposed rule. Please note that 

if we receive adverse comment on a 

particular rule, we may adopt as final 

the rule that is not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

We do not plan to open a second 

comment period, so anyone interested 

in commenting should do so at this 

time. If we do not receive adverse 

comments, no further activity is 

planned. For further information, please 

see the direct final action. 

Dated: November 5, 2015. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2015–30825 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0689; FRL–9936–81– 

Region 9] 

Approval of California Air Plan 

Revisions, Placer County Air Pollution 

Control District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

revision to the Placer County Air 

Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) 

portion of the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) under the 

Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). This 

revision describes actions that PCAPCD 

will take to prevent air pollution 

concentrations from reaching 

dangerously high levels. 

DATES: Any comments on this proposal 

must arrive by January 7, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number EPA–R09– 

OAR–2015–0689, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: Once submitted, 

comments cannot be edited or 

withdrawn. The EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. If you need to 

include CBI as part of your comment, 

please visit http://www.epa.gov/

dockets/comments.html for instructions. 

Multimedia submissions (audio, video, 

etc.) must be accompanied by a written 

comment. The written comment is 

considered the official comment and 

should include discussion of all points 

you wish to make. For additional 

submission methods, the full EPA 

public comment policy, and general 

guidance on making effective 

comments, please visit http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html. 

Docket: Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California 94105–3901. While all 

documents in the docket are listed at 

www.regulations.gov, some information 

may be publicly available only at the 

hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 

material, large maps), and some may not 

be publicly available in either location 

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Vanessa Graham, EPA Region IX, (415) 

947–4120 graham.vanessa@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. In the Rules 

and Regulations section of this Federal 

Register, we are approving the Placer 

County Ozone Emergency Episode Plan 

in a direct final action without prior 

proposal because we believe this SIP 

revision is not controversial. If we 

receive adverse comments, however, we 

will publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule and address the 

comments in a subsequent action based 

on this proposed rule. 

We do not plan to open a second 

comment period, so anyone interested 

in commenting should do so at this 

time. If we do not receive adverse 

comments, no further activity is 

planned. For further information, please 

see the direct final action. 

Dated: October 26, 2015. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2015–30829 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0619; FRL–9936–66– 

Region 9] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Antelope Valley 

Air Quality Management District, 

Feather River Air Quality Management 

District and Santa Barbara County Air 

Pollution Control District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

revisions to the Antelope Valley Air 

Quality Management District 

(AVAQMD), Feather River Air Quality 

Management District (FRAQMD), and 

Santa Barbara County Air Pollution 

Control District (SBCAPCD) portions of 


Lhorne on DSK9F6TC42PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 235 / Tuesday, December 8, 2015 / Proposed Rules 76259 

the California State Implementation 

Plan (SIP). These revisions concern 

volatile organic compound (VOC) 

emissions from architectural coatings. 

We are proposing to approve local rules 

to regulate these emission sources under 

the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). 

Simultaneously, the EPA is proposing to 

delete two related local rules from the 

SIP from Sutter County Air Pollution 

Control District (SCAPCD) and Yuba 

County Air Pollution Control District 

(YCAPCD). 

DATES: Any comments on this proposal 

must arrive by January 7, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number [EPA–R09– 

OAR–2015–0619, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: Once submitted, 

comments cannot be edited or 

withdrawn. The EPA may publish any 

comment received to its public docket. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. If you need to 

include CBI as part of your comment, 

please visit http://www.epa.gov/

dockets/comments.html for instructions. 

Multimedia submissions (audio, video, 

etc.) must be accompanied by a written 

comment. The written comment is 

considered the official comment and 

should include discussion of all points 

you wish to make. For additional 

submission methods, the full EPA 

public comment policy, and general 

guidance on making effective 

comments, please visit http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html. 

Docket: Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California 94105–3901. While all 

documents in the docket are listed at 

www.regulations.gov, some information 

may be publicly available only at the 

hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 

material, large maps), and some may not 

be publicly available in either location 

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415) 

972–3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. This 

proposal addresses the following local 

rules: AVAQMD Rule 1113 

‘‘Architectural Coatings,’’ FRAQMD 

Rule 3.15 ‘‘Architectural Coatings,’’ 

SBCAPCD Rule 323.1 ‘‘Architectural 

Coatings,’’ SCAPCD Rule 3.15 

‘‘Architectural Coatings,’’ and YCAPCD 

Rule 3.15 ‘‘Architectural Coatings.’’ In 

the Rules and Regulations section of this 

Federal Register, we are approving and 

deleting these local rules in a direct 

final action without prior proposal 

because we believe these SIP revisions 

are not controversial. If we receive 

adverse comments, however, we will 

publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule and address the 

comments in subsequent action based 

on this proposed rule. Please note that 

if we receive adverse comment on a 

provision of a particular rule, we may 

adopt as final those provisions of the 

rules that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

We do not plan to open a second 

comment period, so anyone interested 

in commenting should do so at this 

time. If we do not receive adverse 

comments, no further activity is 

planned. For further information, please 

see the direct final action. 

Dated: October 23, 2015. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2015–30808 Filed 12–7–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


Lhorne on DSK9F6TC42PROD with PROPOSALS