alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
February 2011 

Emission Estimation Protocol 

for Petroleum Refineries 

Version 2.1 

ICR Response Version 

Submitted to: 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Submitted by: 

RTI International 

3040 Cornwallis Road 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194 
Version 2.1 

Final ICR Draft Appendix A—Average Stream Compositions 

Appendix A 

Average Stream Compositions 
Version 2.1 

Final ICR Draft Appendix A—Average Stream Compositions 

Table A-1. Refinery Average Stream Hazardous Air Pollutant Compositions—Default Values 

Average Weight Percent of Compound in Process Unit Streama

1,3-Butadiene 

106-99-0 

n-Hexane 

 110-54-3 

2,2,4-Trimethyl 

pentane 

540-84-1 

Benzene 

71-43-2 

Toluene 

108-88-3 

Xylenes (total) 

1330-20-7 

Ethylbenzene 

100-41-4 

Cumene 

98-82-8 

1,2,4-trimethyl 

benzeneb

95-63-6 

Naphthalene 

91-20-3 

Biphenyl 

92-52-4 

Styrene 

100-42-5

Process Units 

Atmospheric Distillation 0.01 4.28 0.05 0.86 1.7 1.97 0.63 0.12 0.63 0.25 0.06 0.001

Vacuum Distillation - 0.007 0.004 0.004 0.043 0.020 0.024 0.001 0.020 0.12 0.09 - 

Coking Unit 0.04 2.49 0.75 0.42 1.30 1.76 0.70 0.12 0.70 0.28 0.001 0.19

Cat Hydrocracker 0.03 1.86 1.04 1.27 2.72 2.67 1.02 0.09 1.33 0.20 0.001 0.19

FCCU 0.01 0.99 0.29 1.03 3.28 4.90 1.07 0.10 1.92 0.72 0.43 0.14

CRU 0.009 2.75 0.25 6.34 17.44 17.61 3.88 0.42 5.93 0.87 0.001 0.11

Hydrodesulfurization - 1.89 0.0001 0.37 1.72 1.94 0.37 0.07 0.40 0.25 0.22 - 

Alkylation 0.22 1.57 25.24 0.03 2.05 0.08 5.0E-5 5.0E-5 5.0E-5 5.0E-5 5.0E-5 0.02

Isomerization - 3.22 0.01 0.51 0.64 0.15 - - - - - - 

Polymerization - 0.54 0.73 1.24 1.76 1.18 0.09 - - - - 

Products 

Aromatics Extract - 

Benzene - - - 99.99 0.009 0.002 - - - - - - 

Aromatics Extract - 

Toluene - - - 0.296 95.61 3.49 2.82 - 0.3 - - - 

Aromatics Extract - 

Xylenes - - - - - 77.89 16.08 0.59 - - - - 

Aromatics Extract - 

Heavy Aromatics - - - 5.7 19.36 25.03 3.56 0.965 4.94 0.314 - - 

Commercial Jet Fuel - 1.68 0.0006 0.577 0.965 1.22 0.257 0.106 0.815 0.627 0.409 - 

Conventional Gasoline 0.0009 2.22 2.94 1.4c 7.75 6.56 1.490 0.219 3.002 0.415 - 0.0767

Aviation Gasoline - 2.30 - 1.01 7.69 3.37 1.2 0.103 0.5 0.695 - - 

Reformulated Gasoline - 1.36 1.10 0.8c 7 7.31 1.26 0.19 2.52 0.21 - - 

Diesel Fuel - 0.030 0.007 0.004 0.081 0.241 0.053 0.056 0.349 0.285 0.117 - 

Home Heating Oil - - - - 0.108 0.300 0.095 - 0.429 0.453 0.181 - 

Solvent-refined Lubes - - - - - - - - - - - - 

Crude Oil 

9.81E05 1.341 0.185 0.312 0.542 0.811 0.186 0.108 0.377 0.139 0.030 

 

a

 Based on Petroleum Environmental Research Forum (PERF) refinery process stream speciation study (API, 2002), 

unless otherwise specified. 

b

 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene is not a HAP, but it is a prevalent VOC in many refinery streams. c

 Average benzene content of conventional and reformulated gasoline based on Fuel Trends Resport: Gasoline 

1995-2005 (U.S. EPA. Report No. EPA420-R-08-002. January 2008), corrected to weight percent using the 

density correction factor of 0.876/0.739 (i.e., 1.16vol%×0.876/0.739 = 1.4wt%; 0.67vol%×0.876/0.739 = 0.8wt%).
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 Statement Re: Computation of Earnings to
Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
  Year ended December 31,2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Earnings:Income from continuing
operations before minority
interest in consolidated
subsidiaries and income or loss
from equity investees
    
    $
    41,726
    
    
    $
    38,872
    
    
    $
    36,117
    
    
    $
    32,033
    
    
    $
    29,190Fixed charges
    
    
    35,117
    
    
    
    32,006
    
    
    
    24,352
    
    
    
    25,296
    
    
    
    25,534Preferred dividend
requirements of consolidated
subsidiaries
    
    
    (1,256
    )
    
    
    (2,512
    )
    
    
    (4,123
    )
    
    
    (7,168
    )
    
    
    (8,818
    )Earnings (1)
    
    
    75,587
    
    
    
    68,366
    
    
    
    56,346
    
    
    
    50,161
    
    
    
    45,906Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    
    32,898
    
    
    
    28,501
    
    
    
    19,439
    
    
    
    17,408
    
    
    
    15,102Amortization of financing fees
    
    
    963
    
    
    
    993
    
    
    
    790
    
    
    
    720
    
    
    
    1,614Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    1,256
    
    
    
    2,512
    
    
    
    4,123
    
    
    
    7,168
    
    
    
    8,818Fixed charges (2)
    
    $
    35,117
    
    
    $
    32,006
    
    
    $
    24,352
    
    
    $
    25,296
    
    
    $
    25,534Ratio of earnings to combined
fixed charges and preferred
stock dividends
  (1)/(2)
    
    
    2.15
    
    
    
    2.14
    
    
    
    2.31
    
    
    
    1.98
    
    
    
    1.80
 1
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 00-605 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NUCLEAR MATTERS 

Nuclear Fuel Qualification Project 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and UKRAINE 

Signed at Kiev June 5, 2000 

with Annex 

and 

Agreement Extending the Agreement 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Kiev April 14 and June 4, 2005 

and 

Agreement Extending the Agreement, 

as Extended 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Kiev August 25, 2010 and February 4, 2011 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 

 UKRAINE 

Nuclear Matters: Nuclear Fuel 

 Qualification Project 

Agreement signed at Kiev June 5, 2000; 

Entered into force June 5, 2000. 

With annex. 

And agreement extending the agreement. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Kiev 

 April 14 and June 4, 2005; 

Entered into force June 4, 2005. 

And agreement extending the agreement, 

 as extended. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Kiev 

 August 25, 2010 and February 4, 2011; 

Entered into force February 4, 2011. 









1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 185 (Wednesday, September 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25303]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 091697D]

Endangered Species; Permits

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Receipt of an application for a scientific research permit 
(1089).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Entrix Inc. At Walnut Creek, CA 
has applied in due form for a permit authorizing takes of an endangered 
species for scientific research purposes.

DATES: Written comments or requests for a public hearing on this 
application must be received on or before October 24, 1997.
ADDRESSES: The application and related documents are available for 
review in the following offices, by appointment:
    Office of Protected Resources, F/PR3, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, 
Silver Spring, MD 20910-3226 (301-713-1401); and
    Protected Species Division, NMFS, 777 Sonoma Avenue, Room 325, 
Santa Rosa, CA 95404-6528 (707-575-6066).
    Written comments or requests for a public hearing should be 
submitted to the Protected Species Division in Santa Rosa, CA.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Entrix Inc. requests a permit under the 
authority of section 10 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) (16 
U.S.C. 1531-1543) and the NMFS regulations governing ESA-listed fish 
and wildlife permits (50 CFR parts 217-227).
    Entrix Inc. requests a five-year permit for takes of adult and 
juvenile, endangered, southern California coast steelhead (Oncorhynchus 
mykiss) associated with fish population and habitat studies in the 
Santa Ynez, Santa Clara and Ventura Rivers and their tributaries within 
the Evolutionarily Significant Unit. The studies consist of five 
assessment tasks for which ESA-listed fish are proposed to be taken: 
(1) Presence/absence, (2) population estimates, (3) spawner surveys, 
(4) genetic sampling, and (5) habitat quality evaluation. ESA-listed 
fish are proposed to be observed or captured, anesthetized, handled, 
allowed to recover from the anesthetic, and released. ESA-listed adult 
and juvenile salmon indirect mortalities associated with the research 
are also requested.
    Those individuals requesting a hearing on this request for a permit 
should set out the specific reasons why a hearing would be appropriate 
(see ADDRESSES). The holding of such a hearing is at the discretion of 
the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA. All statements and 
opinions contained in the above permit application summaries are those 
of the applicants and do not necessarily reflect the views of NMFS.

    Dated: September 17, 1997.
Nancy Chu,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-25303 Filed 9-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
```
Note Consolidation Agreement

Agreement entered into this              day of                   by and between
Richard Margulies  ("Margulies") and Archer Systems Limited, Inc. and
subsidiaries ("Archer").

                                   WITNESSETH

WHEREAS, Archer is the Obligor of certain notes and loans on which Margulies is
the Obligee or assignee, and which are recorded on the books of Archer, all
hereinafter referred to as the ("Debt"), and

WHEREAS, the total amount of the principal and accrued interest of the Debt is
$183,419.19, and

WHEREAS, the components of the Debt are comprised of different maturity dates
and terms, copies of the notes incorporated in the Debt are attached as Exhibits
hereto, and

WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to consolidate all of the Debt on the
following terms and conditions.


         NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto intending to be legally bound hereby
covenant and agree as follows:

         1. RECITALS - The recitals are hereby incorporated herein and made a
part hereof.

         2. MATURITY DATE- The maturity date for the Debt shall be July 30, 2003

         3. INTEREST RATE - Six Percent (6%) per annum compounded

         4 PAYMENT SCHEDULE - Archer shall pay to Margulies;

               (a.) $2,000 per month commencing the first day of the second
         month after the month of the Closing of the acquisition by Archer of
         Ocumed Group, Inc. ("Closing Date").

               (b.) $20,000, to be applied against principal, to be paid upon
         the date that Archer or its subsidiary, Ocumed Group, Inc., receives
         funds from a lending institution or investor in an amount in excess of
         $4,000,000.

               (c.) Installment payment in the amount of on third of then
         outstanding principal shall be due 18 months after
the Closing Date.

               (d.) the then remaining balance of interest and principal on the
         Maturity


<PAGE>




         5. RIGHTS- Conversion, registration, rights are to be pari passu with
any rights to be granted subsequent to the Closing Date to the former
shareholders of Ocumed Group, Inc. with respect to their Income Debenture


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed and sealed this
Agreement as of the day and year first above written


Archer Systems Limited, Inc.


BY:__________________
   Alfred Caggia, President
   Date:

---------------------
Richard Margulies
Date:




<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
in connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) by Tarrant Apparel Group (Registrant), the undersigned hereby certifies that:



|1. | to the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: March 18, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Gerard Guez                     
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Gerard Guez, Chief Executive Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1522

WAYNE A. JONES, Ed.D. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY; MAKOLA M. ABDULLAH, Ph.D

. , Defendants

- Appellees

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. John A. Gibney, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:19

- cv
- 00467

- JAG )

Submitted : January 12, 2021 Decided: February 4, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Richard F. Hawkins, III, THE HAWKINS LAW FIRM, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General, Samuel T. Towell, Deputy Attorney General, E. Lewis Kincer, Jr. Senior Assistant Attorney General, Ramona L. Taylor, Associate College Counsel/Assistant Attorney General, William Ryan Waddell, Assistant Attorney General, Toby J. Heytens, Solicitor General, Michelle S. Kallen, Deputy Solicitor General, Martine E. C icconi, Deputy Solicitor General, Jessica Merry Samuels, Assistant Solicitor General, Zachary R. Glubiak, John Marshall Fellow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Wayne A. Jones, Ed.D., a former assistant professor at Virginia State University (“the University”), appeals the district court’s order granting the University’s and its President’s motion to dismiss Jones’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 co mplaint

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court

. See Jones v. V a. State Univ. , No. 3:19

- cv
- 00467

- JAG ( E.D. Va. Apr. 6,
2020 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

HARRY L. BIERLEY, 1 

Plaintiff, 

JOANNE B. BARNHART, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Civil Action No. 05-07 Erie 

Defendant. 

MEMORANDUM ORDER 

Plaintiff's social security complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on January 

6, 2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for 

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 281, filed on 

November 14, 2005, recommended that Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 

No. 71 be granted. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 

[Doc. No. 291, filed on November 14, 2005, recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for 

Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 131 be denied, and that Defendant's Motion for Summary 

Judgment [Doc. No. 171 be granted. The parties were allowed ten (1 0) days from the 

date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on 

Defendant. Plaintiff filed objections [Doc. No. 301 on November 25, 2005. After & 

novo review of the documents in the case, together with the Reports and 

Recommendations, and objections thereto, the following order is entered: 

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2005; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 

No. 71 is GRANTED; Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 131 is DENIED, 

and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 171 is GRANTED. 

Case 1:05-cv-00007-SJM-SPB Document 31 Filed 11/30/05 Page 1 of 2
The Reports and Recommendations [Doc. No. 281 and [Doc. No. 291 of 

Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on November 14, 2005, are adopted as the opinions of 

the Court. 

S/ Sean J. McLaughlin United States District Judge 

cm: All parties of record 

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:05-cv-00007-SJM-SPB Document 31 Filed 11/30/05 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM
10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 3, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                             909
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (35)
<INVENTORY>                                        712
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,866
<PP&E>                                           1,042
<DEPRECIATION>                                     658
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,102
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,185
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,055)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,322
<SALES>                                          5,618
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,618
<CGS>                                            3,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,726
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     4
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (23)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,268)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,270)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,270)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.71)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2802 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2802

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to remove a 
    prohibition on the use of funds relating to the provision of a 
     dangerous weapon or training in the use of a dangerous weapon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 14, 2023

Mr. Paul (for himself, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Lee, Mr. Schmitt, Mr. 
 Braun, Mr. Vance, and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to remove a 
    prohibition on the use of funds relating to the provision of a 
     dangerous weapon or training in the use of a dangerous weapon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Educating Responsible Future Hunters 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT ON ESEA FUNDING.

    Section 8526 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 7906) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5), by adding ``or'' after the semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (6), by striking ``; or'' and inserting a 
        period; and
            (3) by striking paragraph (7).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 10.81.2
                                                                 ---------------

DATE:         March 15, 2001

TO:           Francois Guillemin

FR:           Kenneth M. Cohen

RE:           Increased Retention Plan Cash Bonus Opportunity

________________________________________________________________________________

As you know, under the Company's retention plan you have been entitled to
receive a cash retention bonus if the Company or its animal health business is
sold and you remain employed by the company at the time of the sale.

At its February 14, 2001 meeting, the Board of Directors decided to increase
your potential cash bonus benefit from the retention plan by doubling the amount
you would receive, including a doubling of the minimum payment from 37.5% to
75%. This recognizes your contributions to date, the value you are expected to
create for the shareholders in continuing to work toward a sale, and the
diminution in the expected value of the stock option component of the retention
plan.

Whether or not you have a written employment agreement, please note that (except
to the extent expressly provided in a written employment agreement) the Company
and you each retain the right to unilaterally terminate the employment
relationship at any time, for any reason or for no reason; neither the original
retention plan nor this augmentation of it changes that.
Exhibit 23.1



                         Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors
Matrix Bancorp, Inc.:


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  registration  statements
(Nos. 333-75000,  333-40482, and 333-36671) on Forms S-8 of Matrix Bancorp, Inc.
(the  Company)  of  our  report  dated  March  5,  2004,  with  respect  to  the
consolidated  balance  sheets of Matrix  Bancorp,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  as of
December  31,  2003  and  2002,  and  the  related  consolidated  statements  of
operations, shareholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year  period ended  December 31, 2003,  which
report  appears in the  December  31, 2003 Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Matrix
Bancorp, Inc.

Our report refers to a change in the Company's method of accounting for variable
interest  entities in 2003 and a change in its method of accounting for goodwill
and other intangible assets in 2002.




                                               KPMG LLP


Denver, Colorado
March 12, 2004