alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49707-49708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United 
States v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (``ARCO''), Civil No. 3-91-CV-248, was 
lodged on August 27, 1997, with the United States District Court for 
the District of Connecticut. The decree resolves claims against ARCO, 
in the above-referenced action under the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), for 
contamination at the Laurel Park Landfill Superfund Site in the Borough 
of Naugatuck, Connecticut (the ``Site''). In the proposed consent 
decree, the settling defendant agrees to reimburse the United States 
for $30,000 in past response costs incurred by the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency at the Site, and to reimburse the State 
of Connecticut $6,000 for the past Site costs. The Consent Decree 
includes a covenant not to sue by the United States under Section 106 
and 107 of CERCLA.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney

[[Page 49708]]

General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, Department 
of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to United States 
v.  Atlantic Richfield Co., DOJ Ref. Number 90-11-2-703.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, Connecticut Financial Center, 157 Church St., 
New Haven, CT 06510, the New England Region Office of the Environmental 
Protection Agency, JFK Federal Building, Boston, MA 02203-2211; and at 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005, (202) 624 0892. A copy of the proposed consent decree may 
be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 
G Street, N.W. 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy, 
please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount 
of $7.25 for the Consent Degree (25 cents per page reproduction costs), 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Bruce S. Gelber,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-25220 Filed 9-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Prop wrench Crecent wrench Needle nose pliers Battery meter Allen wrenches Regular and phillips screwdrivers Extra props Goggles Monitor connector cable Monitor video transmitter Battery telemetry monitor Battery telemetry transmitter Video camera + Shield SLR camera SLR lenses SD card(s) Hex wrench for gimbal camera bolt Camera gimbal bolt Laptop Computer PLUS power cord USB connector wires for computer Pilot radio Gimbal radio IR camera cable Shutter camera cable SLR video cable Panning video cable Cell phone headphones 

## Flight Checklist

## Battery Checklist (ALL charged !!!)

Heli flying batteries (6 mAh) Gimbal Fatshark battery (460 mAh) Gimbal control battery (1000 mAh) Monitor battery (1000 mAh) SLR camera battery (x2) Video camera battery Pilot radio battery Pilot radio telemetry monitor Gimbal radio battery Computer Extra batteries
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2587]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3700]


Wesley-Jessen Corporation; Prohibited Trade Practices, and 
Affirmative Corrective Actions

agency: Federal Trade Commission.

action: Consent Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

summary: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order requires, among other things, an 
Illinois-based manufacturer of opaque contact lenses to divest, within 
four months, the Pilkington Barnes Hind's opaque lens business to a 
Commission-approved acquirer.

dates: Complaint and Order issued January 3, 1997.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

for further information contact: Catharine Moscatelli, FTC/S-2308, 
Washington, D.C. 20580. (202) 326-2749.

supplementary information: On Tuesday, October 8, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 61 FR 52799, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Wesley-Jessen Corporation, for 
the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties were given 
sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or objections 
regarding the proposed form of the order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to divest, as set 
forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition of this 
proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 731; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 38 
Stat. 719, as amended; sec. 7, 38 Stat. 731, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 
45, 18)
Benjamin I. Berman,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2587 Filed 1-31-97 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
#### Diane Caroline BARNES, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41015.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 13, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 245 So.2d 108.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN and McCAIN, JJ.,. dissent.
```

[104th Congress Public Law 15]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ15.104]

[[Page 109 STAT. 189]]

Public Law 104-15
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To reauthorize appropriations for the Navajo-Hopi Relocation Housing 
              Program. <<NOTE: June 21, 1995 -  [S. 349]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE 
                              NAVAJO-HOPI RELOCATION HOUSING 
                              PROGRAM.

    Section 25(a)(8) of Public Law 93-531 (25 U.S.C. 640d-24(a)(8)) is 
amended by striking ``1989,'' and all that follows through ``and 1995.'' 
and inserting ``1995, 1996, and 1997.''.

    Approved June 21, 1995.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 349:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-29 (Comm. on Indian Affairs).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):
            Apr. 26, considered and passed Senate.
            June 8, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
Case 1:04-cv-00277-MBC   Document 11   Filed 03/07/06   Page 1 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00277-MBC   Document 11   Filed 03/07/06   Page 2 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00277-MBC   Document 11   Filed 03/07/06   Page 3 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00277-MBC   Document 11   Filed 03/07/06   Page 4 of 4
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6767

HERMAN L. DOBSON, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THEODIS BECK,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (5:05-hc-00787-BO)

Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 8, 2006

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herman L. Dobson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Herman Dobson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition.

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dobson has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

                                PROMISSORY NOTE



                                                  Dated: January 31, 2000

Principal Amount:  $79,340.45                     State of Colorado


     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby jointly and severally promise to
pay to the order of Matrix Bancorp, Inc.

The sum of  Seventy Nine Thousand Three Hundred Forty and 45/100, Dollars
($79,340.45), together with interest thereon at the rate of Prime per annum on
the unpaid balance. Said sum shall be paid in the manner following:

     All principal and interest shall be due on January 31,2001.

     All payments shall be first applied to interest and the balance to
principal. This note may be prepaid, at any time, in whole or in part, without
penalty. All prepayments shall be applied in reverse order of maturity.

     This note shall at the option of any holder hereof be immediately due and
payable upon the failure to make any payment due hereunder within five (5) days
of its due date.

     This note at the option of any holder hereof may be extended on an annual
basis for increments of one (1) year. The terms and interest rate will remain
constant.

     In the event this note shall be in default, and placed with an attorney for
collection, then the undersigned agree to pay all reasonable attorney's fees and
costs of collection. Payments not made within five (5) days of due date shall be
subject to a late charge of 2% of said payment. All payments hereunder shall be
made to such address as may from time to time be designed by any holder hereof.

     The undersigned and all other parties to this note, whether as endorsers,
guarantors or sureties, agree to remain fully bound hereunder until this note
shall be fully paid and waive demand, presentment and protest and all notices
thereto and further agree to remain bound, notwithstanding any extension,
renewal, modification, waiver, or other indulgence by any holder or upon the
discharge or release of any obligor hereunder to this note, or upon the
exchange, substitution, or release of any collateral granted as security for
this note. No modification or indulgence by any holder hereof shall be binding
unless in writing: and any indulgence on any one occasion shall not be an
indulgence for any other or future occasion. Any modification or change of
terms, hereunder granted by any holder hereof, shall be valid and binding upon
each of the undersigned, notwithstanding
<PAGE>

the acknowledgment of any of the undersigned, and each of the undersigned does
hereby irrevocably grant to each of the others a power of attorney to enter into
any such modification on their behalf. The rights of any holder hereof shall be
cumulative and not necessarily successive. This note shall take effect as sealed
instrument and shall be construed, governed and enforced in accordance with the
laws of the State first appearing at the head of this note. The undersigned
hereby execute this note as principals and not as sureties.

Maker:

         /s/
---------------------
D. Mark Spencer
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50289-50290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25439]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Economic Analysis Bureau

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Economic Analysis.
    Title: Annual Survey of Selected Services Transactions with 
Unaffiliated Foreign Persons.

[[Page 50290]]

    Agency Form Number: BE-22.
    OMB Approval Number: 0608-0060.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Burden: 17,250 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 1,500.
    Avg Hours Per Response: 11.5 hours.
    Needs and Uses: The BE-22 annual survey is required to obtain 
reliable and up-to-date information on selected U.S. services 
transactions with unaffiliated foreign persons, by type of service 
cross-classified by foreign country. It is intended to update the 
results of the BE-20 benchmark survey, which covers the universe of 
such transactions. The BE-20 survey is conducted once every five years, 
and the last survey covered 1996. The BE-22 survey is conducted each of 
the four years between two benchmark surveys; the last BE-22 covered 
1995. Some of the major purposes of the survey are to provide 
information needed in formulating U.S. international trade policy on 
services, support bilateral and multilateral trade negotiations and 
monitoring trade agreements, compile the U.S. balance of payments and 
national income and product accounts, develop U.S. international price 
indexes for services, assess and promote U.S. competitiveness in 
international trade in services, and improve the ability of U.S. 
businesses to identify and evaluate market opportunities.
    Affected Public: Business and other for-profit organizations, and 
non-for profit institutions, state and local government, or other 
institutions engaging in international transactions in covered 
services.
    Frequency: Annual.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    Legal Authority: Title 22 U.S.C., Section 3101--3108, as amended.
    OMB Desk Officer: Paul Bugg, (202) 395-3093.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing DOC Clearance Officer, Linda Engelmeier, (202) 
482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and Constitution 
Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days to Paul Bugg, OMB Desk 
Officer, Room 10201, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, 
N.W., Washington, DC 20503.

    Dated: September 19, 1997.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc 97-25439 Filed 9-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510-06-P
```
#### Sonja MILLER and Milar Gallery, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. Perry Lee AMAZON, Appellee.

No. 71-51.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 5, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

KURTIS E. ARMANN, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 04-118 Erie

)

WARDEN, FCI-MCKEAN, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

McLAUGHLIN, SEAN, J., J.

Presently pending before the Court is the Respondent’s Appeal of the Magistrate Judge’s

Order granting an evidentiary hearing on Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc.

No. 46].

We held a telephonic status conference on June 2, 2006 and ordered that the record be

supplemented with the following documents filed by the parties before the CAAF: (1)

[Petitioner’s] Brief in Support of Petition for New Trial filed by Petitioner’s counsel [Doc. No.

60]; (2) [Petitioner’s] Motion to Attach Documents, Exhibit 1, Petitioner’s Grostofen submission

in support of his petition for new trial [Doc. No. 59]; (3) [Respondent’s] Objection to

[Petitioner’s] Motion to Attach Documents, filed by Respondent [Doc. No. 62]; and (4)

[Respondent’s] Brief in Response to [Petitioner’s] Petition for New Trial, filed by Respondent

[Doc. No. 58]. See Status Conference Tr., June 2, 2006 [Doc. No. 63]. 

In light of this additional evidence, and based upon the parties representations that the

record is now fully complete, see Status Conference Tr., June 2, 2006 pp. 10-12, we are of the

opinion that the matter should be remanded to the Magistrate Judge for reconsideration of her

order granting an evidentiary hearing following her review of this additional evidence in the first

instance. 

AND NOW, this 10th day of July, 2006, upon consideration of Respondent’s Appeal of

the Magistrate Judge’s Order granting an evidentiary hearing on Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of

Case 1:04-cv-00118-SJM-SPB Document 64 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Habeas Corpus [Doc. No. 46], and for the reasons set forth above, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent’s Appeal is DENIED and the matter is

REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. 

s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record. 

Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter

 

 

 

 

 

Case 1:04-cv-00118-SJM-SPB Document 64 Filed 07/10/06 Page 2 of 2
USGS CMG OVERVIEW LOG 

ACTIVITY ID: 11BIM01

TOPIC INFORMATION

USGS ACTIVITY ID 11BIM01

OTHER ID (IF ANY)

ORGANIZATION U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine 

Science Center

PROJECT Barrier Island Mapping

AREAS OF OPERATION Chandeleur Islands, LA

CHIEF SCIENTIST(S) Jennifer L. Miselis

INFORMATION

SPECIALIST(S) Dana S. Wiese

ACTIVITY TYPE Seafloor mapping/shallow subbottom profiling via geophysical 

surveys (high-resolution seismic and swath).

SCIENTIFIC

PUPRPOSE/GOALS

To investigate the geologic controls on barrier island framework 

and long-term sediment transport offshore of the Chandeleur 

Islands.

PLATFORM R/V Survey Cat

STARTING DATE June 3, 2011

STARTING PORT Biloxi, Mississippi

ENDING DATE June 13, 2011

ENDING PORT Biloxi, Mississippi

EQUIPMENT USED

Edgetech SB-424 subbottom profiler running DISCOVER

version 3.51 acquisition software, SEA SWATHplus (234 kHz) 

bathymetry system, and F190 DGPS/IMU navigation systems.

INFORMATION 

TO BE DERIVED (GRAIN SIZE, DEPTH 

TO BASEMENT)

Shallow geologic framework - Shallow subbottom image 

profiles, swath bathymetry (X, Y, Z) and backscatter data.

SUMMARY OF ACTIVITY

AND DATA GATHERED

A total of 133 chirp 2-D subbottom profiles and swath lines were 

collected.

NOTES

Digital 11BIM01 logs were generated by 

A. Forde in June 2012 using the handwritten logs and personal 

accounts of the crew members.
Opinion issued September 4, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 14
- 00436
- CV

——————————— IN RE BOB BENNETT A/ K/A ROBERT S. BENNET T , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Bob Bennett a/k/a Robert S. Bennett, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, requesting that we order the Respondent, identified as the Honorable John Wooldridge, “to provide adequate notice for a new recusal hearing, and to vacate the all [sic] orders entered since the recusal hearing.” 1 In response, the real

1 The underlying case is Kelly Coghlan and Coghlan & Associates v. Bob Bennett a/k/a Robert S. Bennett , cause number 759593, pending in the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable John Wooldridge presiding.2

parties in interest request that we grant sanctions against relator pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Proced ure 52.11.
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We further deny the real parties in interest ’s request for sanctions against relator.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Huddle.
```

[106th Congress Private Law 2]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl002.106]

Private Law 106-2
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   <<NOTE: Aug. 2, 1999 -  [S. 449]>> To direct the Secretary of the 
  Interior to transfer to the personal representative of the estate of 
 Fred Steffens of Big Horn County, Wyoming, certain land comprising the 
                        Steffens family property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF STEFFENS FAMILY PROPERTY.

    (a) Conveyance.--Subject to <<NOTE: Marie Wambeke.>> subsection (b) 
and valid existing rights, the Secretary of the Interior shall issue, 
without consideration, a quitclaim deed to Marie Wambeke of Big Horn 
County, Wyoming, the personal representative of the estate of Fred 
Steffens, to the land described in subsection (c).

    (b) Reservation of Minerals.--All minerals underlying the land 
described in subsection (c) are reserved to the United States.
    (c) Land Description.--The land described in this subsection is the 
parcel comprising approximately 80 acres and known as ``Farm Unit C'' in 
the E\1/2\NW\1/4\ of Section 27 in Township 57 North, Range 97 West, 6th 
Principal Meridian, Wyoming.
    (d) Revocation of Withdrawal.--The withdrawal for the Shoshone 
Reclamation Project made by the Bureau of Reclamation under Secretarial 
Order dated October 21, 1913, is revoked with respect to the land 
described in subsection (c).
```
```

[104th Congress Public Law 30]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ30.104]

[[Page 109 STAT. 277]]

Public Law 104-30
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 
 1994 until November 1, 1995, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Sept. 30, 
                         1995 -  [H.R. 2404]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations 
Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103-236), as 
amended by Public Law 104-22, <<NOTE: 108 Stat. 488.>>  is amended by 
striking ``October 1, 1995,'' and inserting ``November 1, 1995,''.

    (b) Consultation.--For purposes of any exercise of the authority 
provided in section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 
Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103-236) prior to October 5, 
1995, the written policy justification dated June 1, 1995, and submitted 
to the Congress in accordance with section 583(b)(1) of such Act, and 
the consultations associated with such policy justification, shall be 
deemed to satisfy the requirements of section 583(b)(1) of such Act.

    Approved September 30, 1995.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2404:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):
            Sept. 28, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```