alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,443,556
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,140,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 15,870,086
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      15,870,086
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        15,870,086
<LOANS>                                     31,180,593
<ALLOWANCE>                                    459,383
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,350,477
<DEPOSITS>                                  52,043,025
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            211,684
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,336,912
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,758,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              58,350,477
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,957,699
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              921,980
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               240,514
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,120,193
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,826,445
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,827,812
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,292,381
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   90,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,814,066
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                761,565
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     535,457
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   535,457
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .92
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.92
<LOANS-NON>                                     11,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,562,794
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               401,430
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   49,966
<RECOVERIES>                                    17,919
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              459,383
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           459,383
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        459,383


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


            CERTIFICATE REGARDING MICROFIELD GRAPHICS, INC.'S 10-KSB
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2002

     In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Microfield Graphics,
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 28, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I,
the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that:

     The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of this 21st day of
March 2003.

                                                 /s/ STEVEN M. WRIGHT
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                     Steven M. Wright
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
Office of Transportation and Air Quality

EPA-420-B-13-008

January 2013 

Option B Quality Assurance Plan Proposed Requirements.

All components specified in this paragraph (b) require quarterly monitoring. 

(1) Feedstock-related components. 

 (i) Feedstocks are renewable biomass as defined in §80.1401. 

(ii) If applicable, separated food waste or separated yard waste plan under 

§80.1426(f)(5)(ii) is accepted and up to date. 

(iii) If applicable, separated municipal solid waste plan under §80.1426(f)(5)(ii) is 

approved and current.

(iv) Feedstocks are being separated according to a separation plan, if applicable under 

§80.1426(f)(5)(ii). 

(v) Crop and crop residue feedstocks meet land use restrictions, or alternatively the 

aggregate compliance provisions of §80.1454(g). 

(vi) Feedstock is consistent with production process and D code being used as permitted 

under Table 1 to Section 80.1426 or a petition approved through section 80.1416, and 

is consistent with information recorded in EMTS. 

(vii) Feedstock is not renewable fuel for which RINs were previously generated.

(viii) If applicable, accuracy of feedstock energy (FE) calculation factors related to 

feedstocks, including average moisture content m and feedstock energy content E. 

(2) Production process-related components. 

(i) Production process is consistent with that reported in EMTS.

(ii) Production process is consistent with D code being used as permitted under Table 1 to 

§80.1426 or a petition approved through §80.1416. 

(iii) Mass and energy balances are appropriate for type and size of facility.

(iv) If applicable, process-related factors used in feedstock energy (FE) calculation are 

accurate, in particular the converted fraction CF. 

(3) RIN generation -related components. 

(i) Renewable fuel was intended and sold for qualifying uses as transportation fuel, 

heating oil, or jet fuel.

(ii) Certificates of analysis verifying fuel type and quality, as applicable.

(iii) Renewable fuel type matches the D code being used.

(iv) If applicable, renewable content R is accurate pursuant to 80.1426(f)(9).

(v) Equivalence value EV is accurate and appropriate.

(vi) Volume production capacity matches RFS registration. 

(vii) Verify that appropriate RIN generation calculations are being followed under 

§80.1426(f)(3), (4), or (5), as applicable 
(4) RIN separation-related components. 

(i) If applicable, verify that RIN separation is appropriate under §80.1429(b)(4). 

(ii) Verify that fuel that is exported was not used to generate RINs, or alternatively that 

were generated but retired.

(iii) Verify that annual attestation report is accurate.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2920 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the exclusion of 

Pell Grants from gross income. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, and Mr. WYDEN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

the exclusion of Pell Grants from gross income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax-Free Pell Grant 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF PELL GRANT EXCLUSION FROM 

7 GROSS INCOME. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 117(b)(1) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘received 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2920 IS

1 by an individual’’ and all that follows and inserting ‘‘re2 ceived by an individual— 

3 ‘‘(A) as a scholarship or fellowship grant 

4 to the extent the individual establishes that, in 

5 accordance with the conditions of the grant, 

6 such amount was used for qualified tuition and 

7 related expenses, or 

8 ‘‘(B) as a Federal Pell Grant under section 

9 401 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (as 

10 in effect on the date of the enactment of the 

11 Tax-Free Pell Grant Act).’’. 

12 (b) NO ADJUSTMENT UNDER AMERICAN OPPOR13 TUNITY AND LIFETIME LEARNING CREDITS.—Section 

14 25A(g)(2)(A) of such Code is amended by inserting 

15 ‘‘(other than a Federal Pell Grant under section 401 of 

16 the Higher Education Act of 1965 (as in effect on the 

17 date of the enactment of the Tax-Free Pell Grant Act))’’ 

18 after ‘‘section 117’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

21 December 31, 2022. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 02-207.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Joint Strike Fighter Program 

 Agreements Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and OTHER GOVERNMENTS 

Amending the Memorandum of Understanding of 

January 17, 2001 

Signed at Bristol and Washington February 1, and 

February 7, 2002 

Signed at Ottawa and Washington May 16, and May 28, 2002 

Signed at Soesterberg Airbase, Washington, Ottawa, and 

Copenhagen June 5, June 10, June 17, July 8, and 

September 17, 2002 

Signed at Washington, Ottawa, Bristol, and Copenhagen 

June 17, June 20, July 8, September 17, and October 14, 2002 

Signed at Washington, Ottawa, Bristol, and Copenhagen 

June 17, June 24, July 8, September 17, October 14, and 

November 14, 2002 

Signed at Washington, Bristol, and Copenhagen July 11, 

September 17, October 14, and November 14, 2002 

Signed at Washington October 31, and November 14, 2002 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MULTILATERAL 

Defense: Joint Strike Fighter Program 

 Agreements amending the memorandum of understanding 

 of January 17, 2001. 

 Signed at Bristol and Washington February 1, and February 7, 2002; 

 Entered into force February 7, 2002. 

 Signed at Ottawa and Washington May 16, and May 28, 2002; 

 Entered into force May 28, 2002. 

 Signed at Soesterberg Airbase, Washington, Ottawa, and 

 Copenhagen June 5, June 10, June 17, July 8, and 

 September 17, 2002; 

 Entered into force July 10, 2002. 

 Signed at Washington, Ottawa, Bristol, and Copenhagen 

 June 17, June 20, July 8, September 17, and October 14, 2002; 

 Entered into force July 17, 2002. 

 Signed at Washington, Ottawa, Bristol, and Copenhagen 

 June 17, June 24, July 8, September 17, October 14, and 

 November 14, 2002; 

 Entered into force July 17, 2002. 

 Signed at Washington, Bristol, and Copenhagen 

 July 11, September 17, October 14, and November 14, 2002; 

 Entered into force August 10, 2002. 

 Signed at Washington October 31, and November 14, 2002; 

 Entered into force November 14, 2002.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of T REIT, Inc. (the“Company”) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:          (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of    the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the    “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and           (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Jack R. Maurer           Jack R. Maurer *Chief Executive Officer*Date: November 14, 2005     A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.     The foregoing certification is being furnished with theCompany’s Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2005 pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general information language in suchfiling.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 8, 2014

NO. 03

- 13

- 00351

- CR

Julious Lamar Clay, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record an d the parties’ brief s, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial

court’s judgment . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Because

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
### Quality of water of the Gila River basin above Coolidge Dam, Arizona

By: John David Hem

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1104

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Orvie E. SPRINGS, Jr., and Paul Michael Dupuis, Appellants, v. John GOEDE, Appellee.

No. L-276.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Sept. 16, 1969.

Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis, Pensacola, for appellants.

*361Frank C. Bozeman, of Harrell, Caro, Middlebrooks & Wiltshire, Pensacola, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J. and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
### Surface water supply of the United States 1961-65: Part 6, Missouri River basin: Volume 3. Missouri River basin from Sioux City, Iowa to Nebraska City, Nebraska

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1918

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2831 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2831

      To prohibit the non-consensual release of claims by States, 
   municipalities, federally recognized Tribes, or the United States 
              against non-debtors, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2023

Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Ms. Warren, and Mr. Welch) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To prohibit the non-consensual release of claims by States, 
   municipalities, federally recognized Tribes, or the United States 
              against non-debtors, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop shielding Assets from Corporate 
Known Liability by Eliminating non-debtor Releases Act'' or the 
``SACKLER Act''.

SEC. 2. NON-DEBTOR RELEASES.

    (a) Prohibition on Certain Non-Debtor Releases.--Section 105(b) of 
title 11, United States Code, is amended by striking ``a court may 
not'' and all that follows, and inserting the following: ``a court may 
not--
            ``(1) appoint a receiver in a case under this title; or
            ``(2) except as provided by section 524(g) of this title, 
        enjoin or release a claim against a non-debtor by a State, 
        municipality, federally recognized Tribe, or the United 
        States.''.
    (b) Temporary Stay on Actions Against Non-Debtors.--Section 105 of 
title 11, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(e) Notwithstanding subsection (b)(2), a court may issue an order 
staying, for a period not to exceed 90 days, the commencement or 
continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, of a 
judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding by a State, 
municipality, federally recognized Tribe, or the United States against 
a non-debtor that was or could have been commenced before the 
commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a claim 
against a non-debtor that arose before the commencement of the case 
under this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00119-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A CHILD

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-14-81

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial 

court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that Appellees recover the costs of appeal from Appellants.

SIGNED October 28, 2015.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
#### Jeffrey CHILCOTT v. W. Rogers TURNER, Judge, Criminal Court of Record, Orange County.

No. 38781.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 15, 1969.

Appeals dismissed without opinion. 222 So.2d 808.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 52092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26343]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Satellite Reconnaissance

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Open Systems will meet 
in closed session on October 9, 1997 at Strategic analysis, Inc., 4001 
N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia. In order for the Task Force to 
obtain time sensitive classified briefing, critical to the 
understanding of the issues, this meeting is scheduled on short notice.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At this meeting the Task 
Force will examine the benefits of, criteria for, and obstacles to the 
application of an open systems approach to weapon systems, and to make 
recommendations on revisions to DoD policy, practice, or investment 
strategies that are required to obtain maximum benefit from adopting 
open systems. The Task Force should examine application to new defense 
programs, to those that have already made substantial investments in a 
design, and to those that are already fielded, across the spectrum of 
weapon systems, not just those heavily dependent on advanced computers 
and electronics.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, P.L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that this DSB Task Force meeting concern matters listed 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (1) (1994), and that accordingly this meeting will 
be closed to the public.

    Dated: September 30, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Altenate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-26343 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M