alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>


EXHIBIT 99.2

                           VION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this amendment to the Annual Report of Vion Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Howard B. Johnson, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: July 18, 2003

/s/ Howard B. Johnson
--------------------------
Howard B. Johnson
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer



                                     1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHAEL W. HILL, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 03-160 Erie

v. )

)

JOHN LAMANNA, WARDEN, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on May 12, 2003,

and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report

and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1),

and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. The matter was

subsequently referred to Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on April 8, 2004 [Doc.

No. 20]. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 40], filed on

June 13, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc.

No. 4] be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file

objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondent. 

Objections were filed by Petitioner on June 22, 2006 [Doc. No. 41]. After de novo

review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and

Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of July, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus [Doc. No. 4] is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 40] of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, 

filed on June 13, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Case 1:03-cv-00160-SJM-LPL Document 43 Filed 07/03/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Lisa Pupo Lenihan, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:03-cv-00160-SJM-LPL Document 43 Filed 07/03/06 Page 2 of 2
### The lower Gila region, Arizona: A geographic, geologic, and hydrologic reconnaissance, with a guide to desert watering places

By: Clyde Polhemus Ross

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp498

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 10

- 00781

- CR Mona Ortiz CUMBY , Appellant

v. The STATE of T exas, Appellee From the 290th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2005CR5702 Honorable Sharon MacRae , Judge Presiding Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 14, 2011
MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED Appellant Mona Ortiz Cumby pleaded guilty to the offense of credit/debit card abuse. The trial court placed her on community supervision for a period of four years. The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke Cumby’s community sup ervision, alleging she had violated several terms of her probation. Cumby pleaded true to the alleged violations, the trial court found them to be true, revoked Cumby’s probation, and sentenced her to eighteen months04

- 10

- 00781

- CR

- 2

- confinement, which was to run concurre ntly with a recent theft offense. Cumby filed a notice of appeal challenging the trial court’s revocation. Cumby’s court

- appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in which he raises no arguable points of error and concludes th is appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v.
State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Counsel provided p roof Cumby was given a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw and was informed of her right to review the record and file her own brief. Cumby has not filed a brief. After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we find no reversible error and agre e with counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

- 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw filed by Cumby’s counsel and affirm the trial court’s judgment. See id. ; Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.). No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Cumby wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Cri minal Appeals, she must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days after either the day our judgment is

r endered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing or timely motion for en banc reconsideration is overruled by this court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal A ppeals. See id.04

- 10

- 00781

- CR

- 3

- R. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 68.4.
Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, James A. Prestiano, the President and sole officer of PSLRA, Incorporated
(the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002, to which this certification accompanies (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(b) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 19, 2002


                                              /s/ James A. Prestiano
                                              ------------------------------
                                              James A. Prestiano, President
### A method of estimating ground-water supplies based on discharge by plants and evaporation from soil: Results of investigations in Escalante Valley, Utah

By: Walter N. White

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp659A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
-                                 Larger Work: This publication is Chapter                                A of                                                                              Contributions to the hydrology of the United States, 1932                                                                    
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Fluctuations of water levels in wells, if critically studied, may give much information as to the occurrence, movement, and quantity of available ground water. In some localities the ground-water level has been observed to decline during the day and to rise at night, the decline beginning at about the same hour every morning and the rise at about the same hour every night. This daily decline is due to the withdrawal of ground water from the zone of saturation by plants, and the rise at night is due to upward movement of water under slight artesian pressure from permeable beds of sand and gravel at some depth beneath the water table.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SOUTHPORT TERMINALS, INC., Respondent.

No. 40591.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 17, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 240 So.2d 525.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ERNEST KEISTER, : No. 4:13-cv-00118

:

Plaintiff, :

: (Judge Brann)

v. :

:

PPL CORPORATION AND :

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD :

OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, :

LOCAL 1600, :

:

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 19

th day of February 2016, in accordance with the 

accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

In recognition of the Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of 

Defendants, ECF Nos. 54–55, its grant of sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, ECF 

Nos. 62–63, and its grant of fees and costs under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54, ECF Nos. 62–

63,

1. Plaintiff’s counsel, Donald P. Russo, Esquire, shall pay Defendant 

PPL Corporation $57,958.59, as a consequence of PPL’s successful 

Rule 11 Motion.

Case 4:13-cv-00118-MWB Document 70 Filed 02/19/16 Page 1 of 2
2

2. Mr. Russo shall also pay Defendant International Brotherhood of 

Electrical Workers, Local 1600 $57,958.96 as a consequence of the 

Union’s successful Rule 54 Motion.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter final judgment in favor of 

Defendants and close this case.

BY THE COURT:

/s Matthew W. Brann

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

Case 4:13-cv-00118-MWB Document 70 Filed 02/19/16 Page 2 of 2
# Úřední věstník C 168I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 168I |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 645. května 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 168I

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 645. května 2021

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Sdělení |
| | SPOLEČNÁ PROHLÁŠENÍ |
| | Evropský parlamentRada |
| 2021/C 168 I/01 | Společné prohlášení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o financování složky Hodnoty Unie v roce 2021 | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

II   Sdělení

SPOLEČNÁ PROHLÁŠENÍ

Evropský parlamentRada

2021/C 168 I/01

Společné prohlášení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o financování složky Hodnoty Unie v roce 2021

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

II Sdělení

SPOLEČNÁ PROHLÁŠENÍ

Evropský parlament Rada

| 5.5.2021 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CI 168/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2021

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CI 168/1

---

Společné prohlášení Evropského parlamentu a Rady o financování složky Hodnoty Unie v roce 2021

(2021/C 168 I/01)

Aniž jsou dotčeny pravomoci rozpočtového orgánu, spolunormotvůrci se shodují na tom, že složka Hodnoty Unie v rámci programu Občané, rovnost, práva a hodnoty by měla mít od 1. ledna 2021 k dispozici značné finanční prostředky.

Spolunormotvůrci vyzývají Komisi, aby přijala vhodná opatření k dosažení tohoto cíle, zejména aby posoudila využívání nástrojů pružnosti podle právního rámce ročního rozpočtu EU na rok 2021 v souladu s kritérii pro aktivaci stanovenými v nařízení o víceletém finančním rámci.

---
### Regional geology and ground-water hydrology of the Sahil Susah area, Tunisia

By: L. C. DutcherH. E. Thomas

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1757G

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of United Western Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
William D. Snider, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.
    
    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 16, 2007 /s/ William D. Snider
Name: William D. Snider
Title: Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)  2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1

                                 Computation of
                       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Year Ended December 31,
(amounts in thousands)                                  2002         2001         2000        1999        1998
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>
(Loss) income before income taxes and
extraordinary gain                                   $(147,866)   $(140,369)   $  62,353   $  22,522   $   6,544
Equity in losses of equity-method investees              3,405        1,962          385          --          --
                                                     ---------    ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------
(Loss) income before equity in losses of
equity-method investees and before income taxes
and extraordinary gain                                (144,461)    (138,407)      62,738      22,522       6,544
                                                     ---------    ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------
Plus fixed charges:
     Interest expense                                    7,254       17,966        6,384          35         143
     Amortization of costs related to indebtedness       1,095        2,647        1,088          --          --
     Estimated interest factor in rent expense/(1)/        576          734          428         345         252
                                                     ---------    ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------
Total Fixed Charges                                      8,925       21,347        7,900         380         395
                                                     ---------    ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------
Adjusted earnings (loss)                              (135,536)    (117,060)      70,638      22,902       6,939

Fixed charges                                            8,925       21,347        7,900         380         395

Deficiency in earnings to cover fixed charges        $(144,461)   $(138,407)   $      --   $      --   $      --

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                           *            *          8.9        60.3        17.6
</TABLE>

----------

* Calculation not meaningful as ratio is less then 1. Refer to "Deficiency in
earnings to cover fixed charges" calculation.
(1) The interest factor in rent expense is estimated as one-third of rental
expense.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

BUBBAS EAST COAST RODS & CUSTOMS OF FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL LARKINS and GREG LARKINS , Appellee s

.

No. 4D 17

- 606

[ November 16, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Gregory M. Keyser and Edward A. Garrison , Judge s ; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2016

- CA

- 000566

- XXXX

- MB

.

Carlo s M. Recio, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Gene D. Lipscher of Gene D. Lipscher, P.A., Jupiter, for appellee s

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

L EVINE , F ORST and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Searched for **https://www.ncpc.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ncpc.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 38

 40

 42

 44

★▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

05/29

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Christopher L. DILIBERTO.

No. 61777.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana through Harry F. Connick, D.A., Parish of Orleans applying for Writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Frank A. Marullo, Jr. Judge of the Criminal District, Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 10th day of April, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this Court why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.