alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered February 27, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01342-CV

KENNETH D. MURPHY, Appellant

V.

ALFONSO FELIPE MEJIA ARCOS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-11187

ORDER

Before the Court is the February 25, 2019 request of Antionette Reagor, Official Court 

Reporter for the 68th Judicial Court, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We 

GRANT the request and extend the time to March 11, 2019.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 181 (Thursday, September 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24925]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-97-11]


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: September 26, 1997, at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street S.W., Washington, DC 20436.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Agenda for future meeting: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. No. 731-TA-750 (Final) (Vector Supercomputers from Japan)--
briefing and vote.
    5. Outstanding action jackets:
    1. Document No. GC-97-044: Approval of disposition of civil 
penalty, remedy, public interest, and bonding issues in Inv. No. 337-
TA-372 (Certain Neodymium-Iron-Boron Magnets, Magnet Alloys, and 
Articles Containing Same (Enforcement)).
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    Issued: September 16, 1997.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24925 Filed 9-16-97; 11:37 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
### Ground-water resources of Mirage Flats, Nebraska

By: Charles Franklin Keech

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1779BB

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Anna Lee GREENE and W. A. Greene, individually and as Trustees of the Baptist Benevolent Foundation, Appellants, v. The BAPTIST BENEVOLENT FOUNDATION, a non-profit Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. K-317.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

June 10, 1969.

Rehearing Denied July 24, 1969.

*437Anthony I. Provitola, DeLand, for appellants.

Landis, Graham, French, Husfeld & Sherman, DeLand, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment permitting a party to intervene and ordering a dissolution of a benevolent foundation and directing distribution of the assets to the First Baptist Church of DeLand.

It appears that an internal disruption of the Foundation affairs and a general disagreement among the principal factors had reached such a stage that the trial court found an irreconcilable conflict to exist destroying the primary purposes of the corporate charter, and therefore, after considering all the evidence, directed that the duly selected president was still president of the Foundation and directed that she wind up the affairs of the Foundation and distribute the net assets to the First Baptist Church of DeLand.

It would serve no good purpose to recite here, in detail, the various steps of the legal proceedings taken in this case or to go into the question of the evidence. Suffice it to say that the trial courts order comes to this court clothed with a presumption of correctness and the appellants have not demonstrated reversible error, therefore, the orders appealed from are affirmed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Case 1:04-cr-00036-DSC   Document 195   Filed 09/23/05   Page 1 of 7

Case 1:04-cr-00036-DSC   Document 195   Filed 09/23/05   Page 2 of 7

Case 1:04-cr-00036-DSC   Document 195   Filed 09/23/05   Page 3 of 7

Case 1:04-cr-00036-DSC   Document 195   Filed 09/23/05   Page 4 of 7

Case 1:04-cr-00036-DSC   Document 195   Filed 09/23/05   Page 5 of 7

Case 1:04-cr-00036-DSC   Document 195   Filed 09/23/05   Page 6 of 7

Case 1:04-cr-00036-DSC   Document 195   Filed 09/23/05   Page 7 of 7

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2017-04-03T10:19:56-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24072]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. GT97-66-000]


Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation; Notice of Compliance 
Report

September 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 2, 1997, Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern) tendered for filing pursuant to Section 9.1 
of the General Terms and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, Sixth 
Revised Volume No. 1, its report of recalculated Operational Segment 
Capacity Entitlements to become effective November 1, 1997.
    Texas Eastern states that the purpose of the filing is to make its 
report pursuant to Section 9.1 of the General Terms and Conditions of 
its FERC Gas Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume No. 1 of recalculated 
Operational Segment Capacity Entitlements to be effective November 1, 
1997, along with supporting documentation explaining the basis for 
changes.
    Texas Eastern states that copies of the filing were served on firm 
customers of Texas Eastern and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24072 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00183-CR

Stephen Clark

v.

The State of Texas

On appeal from the

347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 05-CR-2655-H(S1)

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 19, 2016
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN,INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-91548,333-64732, and 333-60076) and in the related Prospectus and the Registration Statements(Form S-8 Nos. 333-91544, 333-64166, 333-90489, and 333-42803) of VCampusCorporation of our report dated March 5, 2004, except for Note 15, as to whichthe date is March 23, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of VCampus Corporation included in the Annual Report onForm 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003.

 

 
|   | /s/ REZNICK FEDDER  & SILVERMAN |
|--------|-------------------------------------|

 

 

Bethesda, Maryland

March 30, 2004.

 

----
#### James CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. EE-221.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 11, 1977.

On Rehearing Dec. 21, 1977.

Michael Minerva, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Williams v. State,*110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959); *Wilson v. State,*304 So.2d 119 (Fla.1974); *Bunch v. State,*303 So.2d 705 (Fla. 1 DCA 1974), cert. den., 314 So.2d 778 (Fla.1975), and *Earnest v. State,*342 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 1 DCA 1977).

McCORD, C. J., and RAWLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING GRANTED

PER CURIAM.

On petition for rehearing, appellant’s sentence is vacated, and this cause is remanded to the trial court for an appropriate sentence in accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court filed August 31, 1977, in *Earnest v. State,*351 So.2d 957.

McCORD, C. J., and RAWLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-98738 and No. 333-39407) pertaining to the Vion
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan and in the
Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-37941, No. 333-61477, No. 333-79939
and No. 333-95671) of Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the related Prospectus
of our report dated February 18, 2000, except for Note 11, as to which the date
is March 27, 2000, with respect to the financial statements of Vion
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year
ended December 31, 1999.




                                                     ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Stamford Connecticut
March 27, 2000
THE DIRECTV GROUP, INC.

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of The DIRECTV Group, Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chase Carey, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|/s/CHASE CAREYChase Carey
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Date:
March 10, 2006

---



QuickLinks
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 27, 2009 

s0120 

Order 

 

January 27, 2009 

137520 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137520 

 COA: 278269 

Macomb CC: 2006-005463-FH 

MARVIN LAMONT FRANKLIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 18, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Clyde R. FITZGERALD v. STATE ATTORNEY FOR the SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT.

No. 38839.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2885 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to permit States to record 

in writing that applicants for supplemental nutrition assistance program 

benefits have signed an application through a recorded verbal assent 

over the telephone. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 

Mr. WELCH (for himself and Mr. FETTERMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to permit 

States to record in writing that applicants for supplemental nutrition assistance program benefits have signed 

an application through a recorded verbal assent over 

the telephone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Streamlining Nutrition 

5 Paperwork Act of 2023’’ or the ‘‘SNP Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2885 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

2 Section 11(e)(2)(C) of the Food and Nutrition Act 

3 of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2020(e)(2)(C)) is amended— 

4 (1) in clause (ii)— 

5 (A) in the heading, by inserting ‘‘OR VIDEO

6 PHONE’’ after ‘‘TELEPHONIC’’; and 

7 (B) by inserting ‘‘or by gesture over a 

8 video phone for hearing impaired applicants’’ 

9 before the period at the end; and 

10 (2) in clause (iii)(I), by inserting ‘‘as audio or 

11 in writing’’ after ‘‘record’’. 

12 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

13 This Act, and the amendment made by this Act, shall 

14 take effect on January 1, 2024. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ERNEST KEISTER, : No. 4:13-cv-00118

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : (Judge Brann)

:

PPL CORPORATION, :

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD :

OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, :

LOCAL 1600, :

:

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of October, 2015, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. Defendant International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 

1600’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 36, is GRANTED in 

full.

2. Defendant PPL Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF 

No. 40, is GRANTED in full.

3. Defendant PPL Corporation’s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions, ECF No. 

38, is HELD IN ABEYANCE, pending a Hearing before this Court on 

Thursday, October 29, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom Number 

One, Fourth Floor, United States Courthouse and Federal 

Case 4:13-cv-00118-MWB Document 55 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 2
2

Building, 240 West Third Street, Williamsport, Pennsylvania, 

17701.

4. At the time of the Rule 11 Hearing, the Court will hear arguments 

from both Defendant PPL Corporation and Plaintiff’s Counsel as to:

(i) whether Rule 11 Sanctions are warranted; and

(ii) if Rule 11 Sanctions are warranted, the remedy that is most 

appropriate.

5. No further briefing on Defendant PPL’s Rule 11 Motion is required at 

this time. However, on the day of the Hearing, both Parties may 

submit to the Court three (3) copies of a concise Table of Authorities 

listing the legal sources on which they plan to rely and three (3) 

copies of a small Exhibit Binder containing the relevant pleading or 

discovery material from this case that they plan to reference.

6. The Court will defer entry of final judgment pending the disposition 

of Defendant PPL’s Rule 11 Motion.

BY THE COURT:

/s Matthew W. Brann

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

Case 4:13-cv-00118-MWB Document 55 Filed 10/06/15 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5008-5009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2585]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3701]


Class Rings, Inc., et al.; Prohibited Trade Practices, and 
Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order permits Class Rings, Inc. to acquire 
L.G. Balfour Company and prohibits, among other things, Class

[[Page 5009]]

Rings, Inc. and Castle Harlan from acquiring or agreeing to acquire 
from Town & Country any stock, share capital, equity, or other interest 
in or assets of Gold Lance.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued December 20, 1996.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint, the Decision and Order, and 
Commissioner Azcuenaga's statement are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th Street & 
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Krauss, FTC/S-3627, Washington, 
D.C. 20580. (202) 326-2713.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Tuesday, October 8, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register 61 FR 52796, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Castle Harlan Partners, II, 
for the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties were 
given sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or 
objections regarding the proposed form of the order.

    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to cease and 
desist, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 38 
Stat. 719, as amended; sec. 7, 38 Stat. 731, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 
45, 18)
Benjamin I. Berman,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2585 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
From: Jason Coleman

To: Kordzi, Joe

Cc: Jed Leibbrandt; Carmon McCain

Subject: Re: Information Request

Date: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:06:30 AM

Attachments: image001.png

image001.png

Joe: You should have received all information that is responsive to the request. The polygon

 defines the contiguous acreage attached to the Tolk station, which reported the 3.3 acre-inches

 per acre in 2012. That 3.3 acre-inches was reported across the 47,188 acres. Completing the

 math, that is about 13,000 ac-ft for the Tolk station in 2012.

Regards

Jason

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 11, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Kordzi, Joe <Kordzi.Joe@epa.gov> wrote:

I think this is for Plant X. I need the info for Tolk. It is located WNW from Plant X at

 34°11'5.87"N, 102°34'11.11"W. Thanks.

From: Jed Leibbrandt [mailto:jed.leibbrandt@hpwd.com] 

Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 4:12 PM

To: Kordzi, Joe

Cc: Jason Coleman; Carmon McCain

Subject: Information Request

Joe,

I have attached a map of the reporting area for the Tolk station that includes the

 nearby wells. I have also included the production data for those wells in a spreadsheet.

We only have production data going back to 2012, when the rules were first put in

 place. You will also notice missing data due to the voluntary nature of the reporting

 process at the time. Going forward production reports will be required in one form or

 another. There has only been one usage amount reported for the Tolk station which

 was 3.3 acre feet in 2012.

Let me know If you have any questions.

Jed Leibbrandt

GIS Specialist

HPWD

806.762.0181

<image001.png>
| INTEGRITY MUTUALFUNDS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES | Exhibit 32.2 |
|----------------------------------------------|--------------|

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO				18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,				AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO				SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Integrity Mutual Funds, Inc. (the"Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, asfiled with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), I, Heather Ackerman, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to thebest of my knowledge: 

(1)          the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and 

(2)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.  
| Date:  March 16, 2007 | By /s/ Heather Ackerman |
|----------------------------|-------------------------|
|                       |                    |
|                       | Heather Ackerman        |
|                       | Chief Financial Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 183 (Monday, September 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25259]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 62 FR 46484.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: 10:00 p.m., Thursday, 
September 25, 1997.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has 
cancelled the closed meeting to discuss Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-25259 Filed 9-18-97; 2:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M