alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3001 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the exemption 

from the excise tax on alternative motorboat fuels sold as supplies for 

vessels or aircraft to include certain vessels serving only one coast. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Ms. HIRONO (for herself, Ms. MURKOWSKI, and Mr. SULLIVAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the exemption from the excise tax on alternative motorboat fuels sold as supplies for vessels or aircraft to 

include certain vessels serving only one coast. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maritime Fuel Tax 

5 Parity Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3001 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM EXCISE TAX ON ALTERNATIVE 

2 MOTORBOAT FUELS EXTENDED TO INCLUDE 

3 CERTAIN VESSELS SERVING ONLY ONE 

4 COAST. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4041(g) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following new sentence: ‘‘For purposes of subsection 

8 (a)(2), the exemption under paragraph (1) shall also apply 

9 to fuel sold for use or used by a vessel which is both de10 scribed in section 4042(c)(1) and actually engaged in 

11 trade between the Atlantic (including the Gulf of Mexico) 

12 or Pacific ports of the United States (including any terri13 tory or possession of the United States).’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 this section shall apply to fuel sold for use or used after 

16 December 31, 2021. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
HUGHES ELECTRONICS CORPORATION



EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Hughes Electronics Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Gaines, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:



(1)  The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL J. GAINES                                    
|Michael J. Gaines Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



March 10, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25819]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-531-000]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Filing

September 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 19, 1997, Florida Gas Transmission 
Company (FGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1 the following tariff sheet:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 131
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 132
Second Revised Sheet No. 133

    FGT states that it proposes two changes in order to achieve the 
original purpose of the Cash-Out provisions as contained in Section 
14.B of the General Terms and Conditions of FGT's tariff. First, FGT 
proposes that the Cash-Out indices be modified such that: (1) For 
imbalances due FGT the Posted Price equal the highest of the monthly 
average spot prices for Mustang Island (Tivoli), Vermilion Parish or 
St. Helena Parish, as reported in Natural Gas Week, and (2) for 
imbalances due the Imbalance Party the Posted Price equal the lowest of 
the monthly average spot prices for Mustang Island (Tivoli), Vermilion 
Parish or St. Helena Parish, as reported in Natural Gas Week. FGT 
believes that these changes may work to achieve a portion of the 
previous price premium of the St. Helena Parish over the Mustang Island 
(Tivoli). In addition, FGT proposes that the Imbalance Level Factors 
for imbalance levels of up to 5% be modified such that: (1) For 
imbalances due FGT the Imbalance Level Factor be increased from the 
current 1.00 to 1.05 and (2) for imbalances due the Imbalance Party, 
the Imbalance Level Factor be decreased from 1.00 to 0.95. FGT believes 
that modification of the Imbalance Level Factor is required because the 
differential between the high index and low index may be very small and 
therefore insufficient to discourage gaming. FGT believes that absent 
the proposed changes, FGT's Cash-Out provisions no longer provide a 
disincentive for shippers to swing on FGT's system line pack.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
by Section 154.210 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25819 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
THE DIRECTV GROUP, INC.

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of The DIRECTV Group, Inc. (the "Corporation") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chase Carey, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|/s/CHASE CAREYChase Carey
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

Date:
February 25, 2008

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7245

TROY GOODMAN, SR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS MCBRIDE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph Robert Goodwin,

District Judge. (CA-04-719)

Submitted: February 24, 2006 Decided: March 9, 2006

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Troy Goodman, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Dawn

Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA,

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Troy Goodman, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

§ 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district

court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S.

322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Goodman has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE>
                           Jake's Pizza International, Inc.

                                      EXHIBIT 11
                           COMPUTATION OF EARNINS PER SHARE
                                  SEPTEMBER 30, 1996

The computation of per share earnings was done by obtaining the weighted 
average number of shares outstanding using the "Treasury Stock Method" as 
follows:

                    Net loss for the year    $1,953,136

                    Weighted average
                     shares outstanding       1,153,623

                    Net loss per share            $1.69

Weighted average shares outstanding:
                                             Period
                                          Outstanding
<S>                            <C>              <C>         <C>
Shares outstanding:                  (A)            (B)          (AxB)

10/1/95 - 9/30/96              1,121,540        12 mos.     13,458,480

3/1/96 - 9/30/96                  55,000         7 mos.        385,000

Warrants outstanding:

10/1/95 - 9/30/96                 64,000        12 mos.        768,000

Remove warrants since
stock price did not
exceed exercise price.
(see computation bel             (64,000)       12 mos.       (768,000)


                    TOTAL                                   13,843,480


                    DIVIDED BY 12 TO GET WEIGHTED
                     AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING              1,153,623


Warrant calculation:
                    Strike price:        $6 per share
                    Proceeds on exercise $6 x 64,000)          384,000

Market price of stock did not exceed the strike price at any time during 
the year. Accordingly, the effect would be antidilutive and is not considered.
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GERALD HENDERSON, :

Plaintiff : No. 4:97-cv-00250

:

v. : (Judge Kane)

:

JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWICZ, et al., :

Defendants :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion

for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. 148), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying

memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1) the motion (Doc. No. 148) is DENIED;

2) the Clerk of Court shall re-docket the motion (Doc. No. 148) and accompanying

attachments as a new civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254;

3) the Clerk of Court shall mail to Plaintiff a copy of the court’s Application to Proceed

in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs containing the docket number for the new

action;

4) Plaintiff must file the application to proceed without prepaying fees or pay the filing

fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, or the new action will be dismissed; 

5) Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this order in which to file an

amended petition for writ of habeas corpus in the new action.

S/ Yvette Kane _______

YVETTE KANE

United States District Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania

Case 4:97-cv-00250-YK-CP Document 156 Filed 12/08/15 Page 1 of 1
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2933 

To reauthorize the program of first responder training. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2023 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Ms. HASSAN, and Mrs. CAPITO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the program of first responder training. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Response Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAM. 

6 Section 546(h) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 290ee–1(h)) is amended by striking ‘‘$36,000,000 

8 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023’’ and by insert9 ing ‘‘$57,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 

10 2028’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Searched for **https://www.usability.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.usability.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Netscape Communications Corporation of our report dated January 24,
1997 included in the 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders of Netscape
Communications Corporation.
 
    Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Netscape
Communications Corporation listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.
 
    We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the (i) Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-95536) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, 1995
Stock Plan, 1995 Stock Purchase Plan and 1995 Director Option Plan of Netscape
Communications Corporation, (ii) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-99198)
pertaining to the 1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Collabra Software, Inc.,
(iii) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-4222) pertaining to the 1993
Stock Option Plan of InSoft, Inc. and (iv) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-4478) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Plan of Netcode Corporation, of our
report dated January 24, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the
preceding paragraph with respect to the consolidated financial statement
schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Netscape Communications
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1996.
 
                                          /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Palo Alto, California
March 27, 1997
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.7
                                                                     -----------
                                                                                
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                            ------------------------

                      TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                      -----------------------------------

                     OF MILLENNIUM SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC.
                     -------------------------------------


TO:  The Secretary of State
     State of New Jersey


     Pursuant to the provisions of Section 14A:7-15.1(3), Corporations, General
of the New Jersey Statutes, the undersigned corporation executes the following
Certificate of Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation:

     1.    The name of the corporation is Millennium Sports Management, Inc.

     2.    On December 4, 1998, the Board of Directors of the corporation
authorized a combination of the outstanding shares of common stock of the
corporation, and a corresponding reduction in the number of authorized shares of
common stock of the corporation, in accordance with the further provisions set
forth herein.

     3.    The amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the corporation
will not adversely affect the rights or preferences of the holders of
outstanding shares of any class or series and will not result in the percentage
of authorized shares that remains unissued after the combination exceeding the
percentage of authorized shares that was unissued before the combination.

     4.    All of the outstanding shares of common stock of the corporation are
subject to the combination.  There are 7,198,085 such shares outstanding, all of
which will be subject to the combination; and after giving effect to the
combination, each such share shall be converted into one-tenth of a share of
common stock, with any fractional shares held by any shareholder or issuable
under any instrument as a result thereof to be rounded (up or down) to the
nearest whole share.

     5.    In connection with the combination, the number of authorized shares
of common stock of the corporation shall be reduced from 20,000,000 to
2,000,000, and accordingly, the first sentence of ARTICLE IV of the Certificate
of Incorporation shall be amended so as to read in full as follows: "The total
authorized capital stock of the Corporation is Two Million Five Hundred Thousand
(2,500,000) shares, consisting of Two Million (2,000,000) shares of common
stock, no par value (the "Common Stock") and Five Hundred Thousand (500,000)
shares of preferred stock, no par value (the "Preferred Stock")."
<PAGE>
 
     6.    The amendments shall become effective at the close of business on
January 4, 1999.


Dated:  This 31st day of December, 1998


                                    MILLENNIUM SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC.
          
          
          
                                    By:   /s/ Barry M. Levine
                                          -------------------
                                          Barry M. Levine, President
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Report of Kyzen Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kyle J. Doyel, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 30, 2004                                 /s/ Kyle J. Doyel
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Kyle J. Doyel
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
```

[104th Congress Public Law 124]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ124.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 882]]

Public Law 104-124
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to repeal the 
  saccharin notice requirement. <<NOTE: Apr. 1, 1996 -  [H.R. 1787]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NOTICE REQUIREMENT REPEAL.

    Section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
343) is amended by striking paragraph (p).

    Approved April 1, 1996.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1787:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 104-386 (Comm. on Commerce).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 141 (1995):
                                    Dec. 12, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 142 (1996):
                                    Mar. 19, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Brussels, July 2010 

The International Air Carrier Association (IACA) represents 33 airlines serving the leisure 

industry. IACA members operate over 800 state-of-the-art, environmentally efficient aircraft 

and directly employ more than 50,000 people. Each year IACA airlines transport over 100 

million passengers to 650 holiday destinations worldwide. 

On behalf of its Members, IACA wishes to contribute to the public consultation organized by 

the US Department of Transportation (DOT), which issued on June 8, 2010 a Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking, “Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections,” (NPRM). 

As some IACA’s airline members transport holiday-makers into the United States, the 

proposed rules will impact their operations. 

IACA members, as European carriers, are today already subject to stringent EU passenger 

rights regulations. The new rules proposed by the US DOT on certain matters will create a 

new (and often unnecessary) burden on airlines that operate on routes to/from the US. In a 

few cases, the rules proposed by the US DOT conflict with EU law, thereby creating a risk for 

confusion and legal uncertainty, both for passengers and airlines. 

IACA considers that its airline members should be given an opportunity to analyse 

adequately the potential consequences of the US DOT’s NPRM. 

IACA regrets that the US DOT has proposed a sixty days’ period to collect input. We 

consider that this does not offer sufficient time to collect the necessary data and information 

from all affected parties to evaluate this Proposal. For these reasons, IACA would be grateful 

if the US DOT could grant an additional 90 days to collect the aforementioned essential 

information to provide valuable comments on the NPRM. 

SUBJECT : Request by the International Air Carrier Association (IACA) for a 90-day 

extension of the comment period 

Docket No.: DOT-OST-2010-0140. 

 
Thank you in advance for your consideration of this request. 

Yours sincerely, 

Koen Vermeir 

Director Aeropolitical & Industry Affairs 

The International Air Carrier Association - IACA 

Tel.: +32 (0)2 546 1066 

Email: koen.vermeir@iaca.be

IACA airline members: