alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NANCY PATRICIA ROJAS-GUILLEN, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-71702 

Agency No. A208-681-922 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 20, 2021**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Nancy Patricia Rojas-Guillen, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions 

pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her 

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for 

asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-71702 

(“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 

1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for 

review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that the harm 

Rojas-Guillen experienced did not rise to the level of persecution. See DuranRodriguez v. Barr, 918 F.3d 1025, 1028-29 (9th Cir. 2019) (record did not compel 

finding that harm rises to the level of persecution where perpetrators took no 

violent actions against the petitioner or his family beyond threats). Substantial 

evidence also supports the agency’s finding that Rojas-Guillen did not establish a 

well-founded fear of future persecution. See Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 1022 

(9th Cir. 2006) (petitioner failed to present “compelling, objective evidence 

demonstrating a well-founded fear of persecution”). 

We do not address Rojas-Guillen’s contentions regarding her credibility, as 

the IJ found she was credible. Thus, Rojas-Guillen’s asylum claim fails. 

Because Rojas-Guillen failed to establish eligibility for asylum, in this case, 

she did not establish eligibility for withholding of removal. See Zehatye, 453 F.3d 

at 1190.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Rojas-Guillen failed to show it is more likely than not she would be tortured by or 
3 19-71702 

with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to El Salvador. See 

Aden v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009). 

We lack jurisdiction to consider Rojas-Guillen’s contentions concerning 

voluntary departure because she did not raise them to the agency. See Barron v. 

Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction to review 

claims not presented below). 

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate. The motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 1) is otherwise 

denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SHAUN ADAMS, :

:

Plaintiff :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-15-467

:

T. BICKERT, ET AL., : (Judge Brann)

:

Defendants :

ORDER

May 12, 2015

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1. Adams’ action is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case. 

3. Any appeal from this Order will be deemed frivolous,

without probable cause and not taken in good faith.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

Case 4:15-cv-00467-MWB-JVW Document 11 Filed 05/12/15 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0000944697
<NAME>                                      SB PRINCIPAL PLUS FUTURES FUND L.P.

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                   13,346,392
<SECURITIES>                                             22,913,783
<RECEIVABLES>                                               623,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         36,883,726
<PP&E>                                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           36,883,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     1,287,323
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                               35,596,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             36,883,726
<SALES>                                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          4,572,680
<CGS>                                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          1,025,792
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           3,546,888
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                              3,546,888
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   115.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0


</TABLE>
Order filed December 2, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00909-CR

____________

WILLIAM K. GREEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 180th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 717215

ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment signed August 22, 2014. The Harris 

County District Clerk has informed this Court that the above case was mistakenly 

assigned to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals and should have been assigned to the 

First Court of Appeals.

It is ORDERED that the appeal docketed under this court’s appellate cause 

number 14-14-00909-CR is transferred to the Court of Appeals for the First 
District of Texas pursuant to Local Rule 1.5 14th Tex. App. (Houston) Loc. R. 1.5. 

The Clerk of this Court is directed to transfer all papers filed in this case, and 

certify all Orders made, to the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 4.1



    100,000,000 shares of common stock authorized- Par value $.0001 par value

                                            SPECIMEN


This certifies that________________________________________________________ is
hereby issued_________________________________________________________ fully
paid and transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in
person or by an authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed.

         In witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to
         be signed by our duly authorized officer(s) and our Corporate Seal to
         be hereunto affixed this ________day of _______________ , ____________


---------------------                                ---------------------
Secretary                                            President
### Surface water supply of the United States, 1961-65, Part 15. Alaska

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1936

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Internationallaw and military operations
 
PDF|mobi|epub
 
SuDoc Number:D 208.207:84
Item Number:0408-A (online)
CGP systemNumber:000793140
May 13, 2019
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-1112.2 

________________________________________________________________________ 

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT 

Article 98 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Libreville and Sao Tome 

November 10 and 12, 2003 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 SAO TOME AND PRINCIPE 

 International Criminal Court: Article 98 

 Agreement effected by exchange of notes at 

 Libreville and Sao Tome November 10 and 12, 2003; 

 Entered into force November 12, 2003.
<PAGE>

CERTIFICATIONS                                                      EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Rodney Boucher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Microfield Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 5, 2006

   /s/ RODNEY M. BOUCHER
       ---------------------------
   Rodney M. Boucher
   Chief Executive Officer
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 96-1121 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EXTRADITION 

 Treaty Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and BOLIVIA 

Signed at La Paz June 27, 1995 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 BOLIVIA 

 Extradition 

Treaty signed at La Paz June 27, 1995; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate October 10, 1995 (Treaty Doc. 104-22, 

 104th Congress, 1st Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 24, 1996 (Senate Executive Report No. 104-31, 

 104th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 August 2, 1996; 

Ratified by the President November 4, 1996; 

Exchange of instruments of ratification at Washington 

 November 21, 1996; 

Entered into force November 21, 1996. 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
#### Adele W. SNEAD and Robert Snead, Petitioners, v. Charles H. PLAVCHAK, John Plavchak and Allstate Insurance Company, a corporation, Respondents.

No. 70-829.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 11, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 15, 1971.

Bill Wagner, of Wagner, Cunningham & Vaughan, Tampa, for petitioners.

J. Tim Strickland, Lakeland, and Edward M. Waller, Jr., of Fowler, White, Gillen. Humkey & Kinney, Tampa, for respondents.

McNULTY, Judge.

The discretionary Writ of Certiorari sought herein is denied. Cf. Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Clonts, Fla.App., 248 So.2d 511, opinion filed May 19, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

PIERCE, C. J., concurs.

LILES, J., concurs in denial of certiorari only.
#### BAL HARBOUR VILLAGE, Appellant, v. KASCO REALTY CORP., and all other persons and parties similarly situated, Appellees.

No. 70-1280.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 4, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 11, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit - 10.30
        Amendment to Shuffle Master, Inc. Outside Directors' Option Plan
                           Effective October 24, 1997


                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              SHUFFLE MASTER, INC.
                         OUTSIDE DIRECTORS' OPTION PLAN
                           EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 24, 1997


         The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Shuffle Master, Inc. a
Minnesota corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify that, effective
as of the 24th day of October, 1997, the following resolution was adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Corporation in accordance with the applicable
provisions of Minnesota law:

Resolution Amending Outside Directors' Option Plan (the "Plan")
---------------------------------------------------------------

         RESOLVED, that the undersigned, the members of the Board of Directors
of the Corporation, pursuant to Section 10 of the Plan and applicable Minnesota
law, hereby resolve that Section 5. (01) of the Plan be amended by adding a new
Section 5. (01)(c) as follows:

         "(c) Discretionary Grants. In addition to the method of granting
         options in subparagraphs (a) and (b) set forth above in this section,
         the Board may grant additional options to Directors. Options granted
         under this subparagraph (c) shall be in accordance with the terms and
         conditions of the Outside Directors Option Plan as amended provided,
         however, that the Board may at the time of grant place additional
         conditions and restrictions on any option granted."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name this 24th day of
October, 1997.

                                        /s/ Joseph J. Lahti
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Joseph J. Lahti, Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


The following disclosure is included herein for the specific purpose of being
incorporated by reference into the following registration statements (the
"Registration Statements"): on Forms S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-31858,
333-65472, 333-22201, 333-05927) and on Forms S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-75957,
333-90933, 333-49194).

"The financial statements incorporated in this Registration Statement by
reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001
have been so incorporated in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, independent accountants, given on the authority of said firm as experts in
accounting and auditing."
#### Ruben Ernesto YANCO, Appellant, v. ROYAL TRUST BANK OF MIAMI, N.A., a National Banking Association organized under the laws of the United States, formerly known as the International Bank of Miami, N.A., Appellee.

No. 77-1140.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 24, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 13, 1978.

*440Shapiro, Fried, Weil & Scheer and Richard Daar, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Pallot, Stern, Proby & Adkins and Mary Pollack, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Jett v. Lewis State Bank,*277 So.2d 37 (Fla.1st DCA 1973). See generally *Strate v. Strate,*328 So.2d 29 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); *Biscayne Manufacturing Corp. v. Sandav Corp.,*323 So.2d 315 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); *Fernandez v. Arocha,*308 So.2d 45 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); and *Global Aero Service, Inc. v. Lloyd Aereo Boliviano, S.A.,*157 So.2d 708 (Fla.3d DCA 1963).
#### Levi FISHER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE *of*Florida, Appellee.

No. L-105.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

June 19, 1969.

*416E. D. Cossaboom, Jr., Quincy, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a judgment of conviction and sentence based upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder in the first degree with a recommendation of mercy. The principal question preserved on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment.

Although there is evidence in the record to support appellant’s theory of innocence, there is likewise competent and substantial evidence by eyewitnesses to the crime and appellant’s own confession made shortly thereafter to support the jury’s verdict. It is not the province of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of the facts. The credibility of the testimony and the weight of the evidence are peculiarly jury questions to be decided by the trier of the facts. The findings by the jury will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that the evidence demonstrates that the conclusions reached are erroneous. We have considered the remaining points on appeal but find them to be without substantial merit. The judgment appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A0757. BOATSWAIN v. THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. et al.

The above appeal was docketed on December 29, 2015. The appellant’s brief

was due on or before January 18, 2016. As of the date of this order, appellant has not

filed appellant’s brief and enumeration of errors. See Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a).

Therefore, appellee’s motion to dismiss appeal is hereby GRANTED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/11/2016

February 11, 2016