alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          50,593
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,017
<INVENTORY>                                     26,360
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,857
<PP&E>                                         406,584
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 726,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,893
<BONDS>                                        564,689
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,882
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   726,364
<SALES>                                        361,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               361,280
<CGS>                                          278,478
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  278,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,230
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,792
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,669)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,357)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,312)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,312)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (10,312.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (10,312.00)
        

</TABLE>
APPENDIX A

NavData Card Use

190 190-00356-00 Rev C

Appendix A 

 NavData Card Use

The JeppesenÊ >Û>Ì>® card supplied with your 

400W-series unit can be installed or removed when 

the 400W-series unit is off. Insert the card with the 

swing arm handle at the bottom and the label facing 

ÌÊÌiÊivÌÊ­ÃiiÊÕÃÌÀ>ÌÊÀ}Ì®°ÊvÊÌiÊ >Û>Ì>ÊV>À`Ê

is not present when the unit is turned on, you will 

ÀiViÛiÊ>Êo Êi««iÃiÊÛ>ÌÊ>Ì>L>Ãi - Limited to 

user defined waypoints” message on the database confirmation page°ÊvÊÌiÊ >Û>Ì>ÊV>À`ÊÃÊÀiÛi`Ê`ÕÀ}Ê

«iÀ>Ì]Ê>Êo>Ì>ÊV>À`ÊÀiÛi`1ÌÊÜÊÀiÃÌ>ÀÌÊÊÎäÊ

seconds” warning. The 400W-series unit will automatically reinitialize even if the card is reinserted. You may 

also reinitialize the unit manually by pressing ENT. 

To insert the NavData card: 

1. Place the card into the NavData card slot, with 

the label facing to the left and the swing arm 

handle at the bottom front. 

NOTE: There are two data card slots on the face 

of the 400W-series. The Jeppesen NavData® 

card should be inserted in the left-most slot. The 

second slot is provided for the terrain card. 

2. Press the NavData card into place until it seats 

on the internal connector and the front of the 

card is flush with the face of the 400W-series 

unit. 

3. If the swing arm handle is up, gently lower the 

handle and push it into place—flush with the 

face of the 400W-series unit. 







To remove the NavData card: 

1. Gently press on the tab—using a slight upward 

motion—at the front center of the NavData 

card. This will partially deploy the swing arm 

handle. 

2. Turn the swing arm handle upward (and outward) until it locks into place, perpendicular to 

the face of the 400W-series unit. 

3. Grasp the top and bottom surfaces of the swing 

arm handle, between your thumb and forefinger, and pull directly away from the face of the 

400W-series unit to unseat the connector and 

remove the NavData card.
**EXHIBIT
        32**
 **HERBORIUM
        GROUP, INC.**
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Herborium Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Agnes Olszewski,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.




*Date:*April
                14, 2008/s/ *Agnes
              Olszewski**Agnes
                Olszewski**Chief
                Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and*
              *Chief
                Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
                Officer)*




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT A.2

                    CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS N.V.,
                            INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-92502) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Plan, the 1995 Director
Option Plan, the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan for U.S. Employees and the
1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan for Non-U.S. Employees; Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-34479) pertaining to Amended 1995 Stock Plan and 1996 Director
Option Plan of Aurum Software, Inc.; Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-34973) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Plan of Baan Company N.V.; Registration
Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-24201) and related Prospectus pertaining to
Convertible Subordinated Notes of Baan Company N.V., of our report dated July
17, 2000, which includes an emphasis of a matter related to the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Baan Company N.V. included in the Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                          PricewaterhouseCoopers N.V.

Amsterdam, The Netherlands
July 17, 2000

                      CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG ACCOUNTANTS
                              INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (i) Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-92502) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Plan, the 1995
Director Option Plan, the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan for U.S. Employees
and the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan for Non-U.S. Employees, (ii)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-34479) pertaining to Amended 1995 Stock
Plan and 1996 Director Option Plan of Aurum Software, Inc., (iii) Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-34973) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Plan of Baan
Company N.V. (iv) Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-19557) and related
Prospectus pertaining to the registration of the common stock issued in
connection with the business combination of Antalys, Inc., and (v) Registration
Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-24201) and related Prospectus pertaining to
Convertible Subordinated Notes of Baan Company N.V., of our report dated May 4,
1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Baan Company N.V.
included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                          Ernst & Young Accountants

                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG ACCOUNTANTS

Utrecht, The Netherlands
July 17, 2000

                                       90
From: Rahul Pendse <RPendse@trinityconsultants.com>

Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 3:53 PM

To: Krivo, Stan; Gillam, Rick

Cc: Land, Eva; Fortin, Kelly; Carlson, Sara; Kathryn Maness 

(Kathryn.Maness@anadarko.com); Grygar, Bill

Subject: RE: Anadarko BlackHawk-BlackHornet PSD/Title V applications -

Responses to EPA Comments (Air Dispersion Modeling Section)

Attachments: Anadarko BlackHawk BlackHornet Incompleteness Letter Response -

Modeling Comments.pdf

Hello Stan and Rick,

Please find Anadarko’s response to EPA’s comments/clarification requests specified in the 

incompleteness letter for BlackHawk and BlackHornet PSD/Title V applications. The attached response 

letter is focused on air dispersion modeling related comments (i.e., comments no. 16 to 25). We believe 

that most of the responses will also be applicable to Bob Douglas PSD/Title V application currently 

under review. Please let me or Sara Carlson know if you have any follow-up questions or need more 

clarification. Thanks for your help.

Eva - Trinity and Anadarko are preparing a response to remaining comments in the incompleteness 

determination letter. We will keep you posted. Thanks!

................................................................................................................

Rahul Pendse

Managing Consultant

Trinity Consultants – Baton Rouge

301 Main Street, Suite 900 | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825

Office: 225-346-4003 | Mobile: 714-454-0518

Email: rpendse@trinityconsultants.com

_________________________________________________________________________

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to

which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged

material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or

taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or

entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you

Received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material 

from any computer.

_________________________________________________________________________
Exhibit 8.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AND JOINTLY CONTROLLED ENTITIES    As of May 15, 2015

Incorporated in Netherlands

Bratel B.V.
(100%)

Incorporated in Brazil

Bratel
Brasil, S.A. (100%)
PTB2 S.A. (100%)
Marnaz Holdings S.A. (100%)
Sayed RJ Participações, S.A. (65%)
Venus RJ Participações, S.A. (65%)
PASA Participações, S.A. (85.1%)
EDSP75 Participações, S.A. (85.1%)
AG Telecom Participações, S.A. (57.5%)
LF Tel, S.A. (57.5%)
Telemar Participações, S.A. (68.4%)
Oi, S.A. (27.5%)

---



QuickLinks
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TERRENCE A. HARRIS :

 :

Plaintiff, : Case No. 4:15-cv-00135

 :

v. :

 :

WILLIAM WENZEL, : (Judge Brann)

COUDERSPORT BOROUGH POLICE :

DEPARTMENT, TROOPER/OFFICER :

TWIGG, and SERGEANT GOODWIN :

 :

Defendants. :

ORDER

August 19, 2015

AND NOW, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 17) is hereby GRANTED, and 

all remaining claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

2. Final Judgment is entered in favor of all Defendants and against the 

Plaintiff.

3. The clerk of court is directed to CLOSE this case.

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge 

Case 4:15-cv-00135-MWB Document 19 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 1
#### EMMANUEL NURSING HOME and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Hubertine WALL and the Florida Department of Commerce, Respondents.

No. 40527.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 18, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March. 23, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51155-51156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25874]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

Levi Strauss and Company;
TA-W-33,513; Goodyear Cutting Facility and El Paso Field 
Headquarters; 1440 Goodyear, El Paso, Texas;
TA-W-33,513W; Kastrin Street Plant; 1000 Kastrin Street, El Paso, 
Texas

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on August 7, 1997, applicable to 
workers of Levi Strauss and Company, located in El Paso, Texas. The 
notice will be published soon in the Federal Register.
    At the request of the company, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information received 
by the company shows that worker separations have occurred at the 
Kastrin Street Plant and the El Paso Field Headquarters, El Paso, Texas 
locations of Levi Strauss and Company. The Kastrin Street Plant is a 
sewing facility for Levi's manufacturing facilities. The El Paso Field 
Headquarters at 1440 Goodyear in El Paso, Texas is an administrative 
office servicing the western regional manufacturing facilities of Levi 
Strauss. The 1440 Goodyear location is also a cutting facility. The 
workers are engaged in employment related to the production of men's, 
women's and youth's denim jeans and jackets. Based on this new 
information, the Department is amending the certification to cover the 
subject firm's Kastrin Street Plant and the El Paso Field Headquarters, 
El Paso, Texas.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Levi Strauss and Company who were adversely affected by 
increased imports

[[Page 51156]]

of men's, women's and youth's denim jeans and jackets.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-33,513 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of Levi Strauss and Company, Goodyear Cutting 
Facility and El Paso Field Headquarters, El Paso, Texas (TA-W-
33,513) and Kastrin Street Plant, El Paso Texas (TA-W-33,513W) 
engaged in employment related to the production of men's, women's 
and youth's denim jeans and jackets who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after May 13, 1996 are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act 
of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC this 14th day of September, 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-25874 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Region I Advisory Council Meeting; Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration Region I Advisory Council, 
located in the geographical area of Augusta, Maine, will hold a public 
meeting at 9:30am on Tuesday, September 23, 1997, in the Edmund S. 
Muskie Federal Building, Room 512, 40 Western Avenue, Augusta, Maine, 
to discuss such matters as may be presented by members, staff of the 
U.S. Small Business Administration, or others present.
    For further information, write or call Mr. Roy Perry, District 
Director, U.S. Small Business Administration, 40 Western Avenue, 
Augusta, Maine, 04330, telephone number 207-622-8242.
Eugene Carlson,
Associate Administrator, Office of Communication & Public Liaison.
[FR Doc. 97-24888 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 02-41042 Summary Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LEANDRO GUTIERREZ-ESTRADA,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(B-02-CR-45-1)

_________________________________________________________________ March 12, 2003

Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Leandro Gutierrez-Estrada, convicted for violating 8 U.S.C. §

1326(a), appeals his sentence. Prior to deportation, Gutierrez was

convicted for possession of marijuana for resale, for which he was

sentenced to two years of custody, suspended for two years of

probation.

Gutierrez contends the d istrict court p lainly erred by

increasing his offense level by 12, pursuant to U.S.S.G. §

2L1.2(b)(1)(B). S ee U.S.S.G., cmt. n.1 (A)(iv) (for purposes of2

determining whether, inter alia

, sentence imposed for drug

trafficking was 13 months or less, “sentence imposed” refers only

to portion of sentence not probated or suspended). Given the lack

of controlling authority in this circuit on this issue, and as

discussed below, any error on the part of the district court was

not “clear or obvious” and, therefore, d oes not constitute plain

error. See e.g.

, United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64

(5th Cir. 1994) (en banc).

Subsection (b)(1)(B) provides for a 12-level enhancement when

the defendant was previously convicted of a “fel ony drug

trafficking offense for which the sentence imposed was 13 months or

less ”. (Emphasis added.) Arguably, pursuant to § 2L1.2’s abovereferenced commentary, Gutierrez’ “sentence imposed” was zero

months, a period “less” than 13 months. In other words, and

pursuant to the comment ary, even though the entire sentence was

probated, the “sentence imposed” is arguably zero months, because

that was the portion of the sentence not probated. Again, because

there is no controlling authority in this circuit, any error did

not meet the required level of being “clear” or “obvious”.

Gutierrez contends that the sentence-enhancing provisions of

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional in the light

of Apprendi v. New Jersey
, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Gutierrez

acknowledges this issue is forecl o sed by Almendarez-Torres v.3

United States

, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve it for

Supreme Court review.

AFFIRMED
~p.rrr GUIDE QUICK~· · 

WWW.STEADIDRONE.COM 
OOWNi.oJu, TttE QUJCICSTART GUIDE 

(WI1;ej,- have oloviausry done '*-Y. 

as YOU are reading it right now, haha) 


a see 0 

NAZA V2 I APM 2 .6 

GPS ATTI I AL.T HOL.D 

A TTl I GPS HOL.D 

FAILSAFE I RETURN HOME 
NAZA 

V2 

To 

arm 

the 

Naza 

V2 

move 

the 

sti

cks 

t

o 

any 

bottom 

comer 

at 

the 

same 

time. 

The 

motors 

will 

spin 

up 

once 

armed. 

Before 

arming 

your 

unit, 

your 

radio 

and 

drone 

need 

to 

be 

powered. 

APM 

2.6 

I 

PIXHAWK 

To 

arm 

the 

APMI

PIXHAWK 

move 

the 

l

e

ft 

stick 

to 

the 

bottom 

right. 

(For 

PIXHAWK 

you 

will 

need 

to 

press 

and 

hold 

the 

pre-arm 

button 

before 

arming). 

The 

motors 

will 

spin 

once 

you 

go 

above 

1

% 

throttle. To disarm 

the 

APM/PIXHAWK 

move 

the 

left 

s

tick 

to 

the 

bottom 

left. 

APM 

2.6 

I 

PIXHAWK 

Data 

Telemetry 

APM 

2.6

-

You 

will 

n

eed 

to 

plug 

DF13 

cable 

into 

the 

Telem. 

port 

on 

the 

flight 

controller, 

and 

into 

the 

port 

on 

the 

data 

telemetry 

module

. 

PIXHAWKYou 

will 

need 

to 

plug 

DF13 

c

a

ble 

into 

th

e 

Telem 

1 

port 

on 

the 

night 

controller, 

and 

into 

the 

port 

on 

the 

data 

telemetry 

module

. 

You 

can 

mount 

the 

data 

telemetry 

module 

on 

the 

battery 

plate

. 

You 

will 

need 

to 

plug 

the 

other 

data 

telemetry 

module 

into 

your 

PC 

or 

Android 

device

. 

Naza 

V2 

Compass 

Calibration 

Please 

ensure 

that 

you 

do 

the 

Naza 

V2 

compass 

calibration. 

Please 

visit 

our 

support 

page 

on 

our 

website 

for 

the 

Naza 

V2 

Quick 

Start 

guide. 

http://www.steadfdrone.comllndex.

p

hp/support?alias=supp

o

rt 
-

Charging 

For charging instructions please read the 

chargers manual. 

Battery Voltages (4 Cell Battery) 

Fully Charged Battery - 4.2v per cell, 16.8v in 

total. 

Flat Battery- 3.6v per cell, 14.4v in total. 

I.IPo Batteries 

Please read our l.iPo Disposal and safety 

guide on our website. 

http://www.steadldrone.com/index.ph,plsupport?alias::support 

WWW.STEADIDRONE.COM
Case 1:04-cv-00242-MBC-SPB   Document 42   Filed 10/17/06   Page 1 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00242-MBC-SPB   Document 42   Filed 10/17/06   Page 2 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00242-MBC-SPB   Document 42   Filed 10/17/06   Page 3 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00242-MBC-SPB   Document 42   Filed 10/17/06   Page 4 of 4
#### Ruth Swetlow et al., Respondents, *v.*Zindorest Park, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

July 2, 1952.

*John J. Cunneen*for appellant.

*Jules H. Enrich*and *Daniel P. Hays*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

While the direction of a verdict for plaintiffs as matter of law was proper (General Business Law, § 201), the issue of damages was for the jury.

The judgment should be modified by directing judgments for plaintiffs and remitting the case to the court below for the assessment of damages, with costs.

Hammer, Hopstadter and Schreiber, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.
Exhibit 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Form
S-8 No. 333-113271 pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Incentive
Plan, the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, and the Amended and Restated 1995 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan of LeCroy Corporation, Form S-8 No. 333-03144 pertaining to
the Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Incentive Plan, the 1995 Non-employee
Director Stock Option Plan, and the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of LeCroy
Corporation, Form S-8 No. 333-91833 pertaining to the 1998 Non-employee Director
Stock Option Plan of LeCroy Corporation, Form S-3/A No. 333-112630 pertaining to
the registration of 2,825,000 shares of LeCroy Corporation's Common Stock, Form
S-3/A No. 333-64848 pertaining to the registration of Common Stock and Warrants
of LeCroy Corporation, Form S-3 No. 333-46418 pertaining to registration of
738,221 shares of LeCroy Corporation's Common Stock, Form S-3 No. 333-43690
pertaining to the registration of 100,000 shares of LeCroy Corporation's Common
Stock, Form S-3 No. 333-88239 pertaining to the registration of 750,000 shares
of LeCroy Corporations Common Stock, Form S-3 No. 333-43699 pertaining to the
registration of 454,148 shares of LeCroy Corporation's Common Stock, Form S-3
No. 333-37269 pertaining to the registration of 95,181 shares of LeCroy
Corporation's Common Stock, and Form S-3 No. 333-22117 pertaining to the
registration of 2,300,000 shares of LeCroy Corporation's Common Stock, of our
report dated July 31, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule for the year ended June 30, 2002 of LeCroy Corporation
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2004.



                                                             /s/ ERNST&YOUNG LLP

MetroPark, New Jersey
September 7, 2004
#### Joseph P. WRIGHT v. Gordon G. OLDHAM, State Attorney for Fifth Judicial Circuit of Florida.

No. 38900.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.