alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 05-11985-WWB Doc 39 Filed 07/28/06 Entered 07/31/06 09:50:54 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case 05-11985-WWB Doc 39 Filed 07/28/06 Entered 07/31/06 09:50:54 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Case 05-11985-WWB Doc 39 Filed 07/28/06 Entered 07/31/06 09:50:54 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2799 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish an 

Office of Rural Health, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 

Mrs. HYDE-SMITH (for herself and Mr. MERKLEY) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

establish an Office of Rural Health, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CDC OFFICE OF RURAL HEALTH. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

5 Human Services, acting through the Director of the Cen6 ters for Disease Control and Prevention, shall establish 

7 within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention an 

8 office to be known as the Office of Rural Health, to be 

9 headed by a director selected by the Director of the Cen10 ters for Disease Control and Prevention. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2799 IS

1 (b) DUTIES AND AUTHORITIES.—The duties and au2 thorities of the Director of the Office of Rural Health shall 

3 be limited to the following: 

4 (1) Serving as the primary point of contact in 

5 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on 

6 matters pertaining to rural health. 

7 (2) Assisting the Director of the Centers for 

8 Disease Control and Prevention in conducting, co9 ordinating, and promoting research regarding public 

10 health issues affecting rural populations, and in dis11 seminating the results of such research. 

12 (3) Working with all personnel and offices of 

13 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to 

14 develop, refine, coordinate, and promulgate policies, 

15 best practices, lessons learned, and innovative, suc16 cessful programs to improve care and services (in17 cluding through telehealth) for rural populations. 

18 (4) Coordinating and supporting rural health 

19 research, conducting and supporting educational out20 reach, and disseminating evidence-based interven21 tions related to health outcomes, access to health 

22 care, and lifestyle challenges, to prevent death, dis23 ease, injury, and disability, and promote healthy be24 haviors in rural populations. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 2799 IS

1 (5) Improving the understanding of the health 

2 challenges faced by rural populations. 

3 (6) Identifying disparities in the availability of 

4 health care and public health interventions for rural 

5 populations. 

6 (7) Awarding and administering grants, cooper7 ative agreements, and contracts to provide technical 

8 assistance and other activities as necessary to sup9 port activities related to improving health and health 

10 care in rural areas. 

11 (8) Coordinating with the Federal Office of 

12 Rural Health Policy of the Health Resources and 

13 Services Administration, as needed, to facilitate co14 operation on rural health initiatives and avoid dupli15 cation of efforts. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 11
                         The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.
               Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
                      (in millions, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             12-weeks Ended                36-weeks Ended
                                                             --------------                --------------
                                                         September      September     September        September
                                                          6, 2003        7, 2002       6, 2003          7, 2002
                                                         --------        -------       -------          -------
Number of shares on which basic earnings
  per share is based:

<S>                                                           <C>            <C>           <C>              <C>
  Average outstanding during period................           268            283           273              282
  Add - Incremental shares under stock
    compensation plans.............................             6             11             7               12
                                                            -----          -----         -----            -----

Number of shares in which diluted
  earnings per share is based......................           274            294           280              294

Net earnings applicable to common
   shareholders ...................................         $ 183          $ 178         $ 347            $ 371

Net earnings on which diluted earnings
   per share is based .............................         $ 183          $ 178         $ 347            $ 371

Basic earnings per share...........................         $0.68          $0.63         $1.27            $1.31

Diluted earnings per share.........................         $0.67          $0.61         $1.24            $1.26
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of T REIT, Inc. (the“Company”) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:          (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of    the Company for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the    “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and           (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Scott D. Peters           Scott D. Peters *Chief Financial Officer*Date: November 14, 2005     A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.     The foregoing certification is being furnished with theCompany’s Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2005 pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing of the Company, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general information language insuch filing.
PUBLIC LAW 113–29—AUG. 9, 2013 127 STAT. 509 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2167: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013): 

June 12, considered and passed House. 

July 30, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–29 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to establish additional requirements to improve the fiscal safety and soundness of the home 

equity conversion mortgage insurance program. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reverse Mortgage Stabilization 

Act of 2013’’. 

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR 

HOME EQUITY CONVERSION MORTGAGE INSURANCE PROGRAM. 

Subsection (h) of section 255 of the National Housing Act (12 

U.S.C. 1715z–20(h)) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end 

and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

‘‘(3) establish, by notice or mortgagee letter, any additional 

or alternative requirements that the Secretary, in the Secretary’s discretion, determines are necessary to improve the 

fiscal safety and soundness of the program authorized by this 

section, which requirements shall take effect upon issuance.’’. 

Approved August 9, 2013. 

Reverse 

Mortgage 

Stabilization Act 

of 2013. 

12 USC 1701 

note. 

Aug. 9, 2013 

[H.R. 2167] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
### Ground water for irrigation in Box Butte County, Nebraska, with a section on the chemical quality of the water

By: Raymond L. NaceW. H. Durum

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir166

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 185 (Wednesday, September 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25297]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-100-001]


Nora Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Change in FERC Gas 
Tariff

September 18, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 12, 1997, Nora Transmission Company 
(Nora), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to be effective 
October 1, 1997:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 4

    On August 21, 1997, Nora made its 1997 Annual Charge Adjustment 
(ACA) filing to incorporate the unit surcharge of $0.0021 consistent 
with the invoice received on August 6, 1997. After the filing was made, 
a revised invoice was received on August 26, 1997 which changed the ACA 
unit surcharge to $0.0022. This revised filing is being made to reflect 
the August 26, 1997 ACA unit surcharge.
    Pursuant to Section 154.207 of the Commission's Regulations, Nora 
requests that the Commission grant any waivers necessary to permit the 
tariff sheets contained herein to become effective October 1, 1997.
    Nora states that a copy of its filing has been served upon its 
customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25297 Filed 9-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-31240

Summary Calendar

MICHAEL COOPER,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

TIM WILKINSON, individually and in his official capacity; NURSE ANGIE 

WOOD, individually and in her official capacity; SHERYL WILEY, 

individually and in her official capacity; PAT THOMAS,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 1:09-CV-1568

Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Cooper appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. His 

brief contains no citations to the record in support of either his statement of 

the facts or his legal argument. Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure

28(a)(7) and (9), the appellant’s brief must include “a statement of facts 

relevant to the issues submitted for review with appropriate references to the 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 19, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 12-31240 Document: 00512446883 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/19/2013
No. 12-31240

record” and an argument section that contains the “appellant’s contentions and 

the reasons for them, with citations to the authorities and parts of the record 

on which the appellant relies.” Because Cooper has not provided any record 

support for his appellate arguments, he has abandoned them by failing to 

adequately brief them. See United States v. Cothran, 302 F.3d 279, 286 n.7 

(5th Cir. 2002); Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993); 

Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 

1987).

Accordingly, Cooper’s motion to file a supplemental brief is GRANTED, 

the motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and the judgment of the 

district court is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-31240 Document: 00512446883 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/19/2013
#### The State, ex rel. The Highway Construction Co., *v.*Baker, Director of Finance.

(Four cases between the same parties.)

*Administrative code*— Section *154-28 et seq., General*Gode— *Functions of department of finance*— Approval *of estimates —State highway department contract.*

(Nos. 17979 to 17982

Decided May 18, 1923.)

In Mandamus.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Messrs. Reed, Meals, Orgill & Maschke*and *Messrs. Fawner & Cheney,*for relator.

*Mr. C. C. Crabbe,*attorney general; *Mr. J. C. Williamson*and *Mr. William J. Meyer,*for. defendant.

By the Court.

The petitions in these cases allege that the relator has entered into a contract with the *625highway department for the construction of a road improvement in Lorain county, has entered upon the performance of same, and is complying in all respects with the statutes, the rules of the department, and the specifications of his contract, and that estimates have been made of the work already done, which estimates have been submitted in the regular way to the department of finance for allowance and approval as provided by law. Among other allegations of the petitions we find the following:

“That such estimate so made and so certified to the defendant herein as aforesaid, was a legal estimate, and was made, certified, and presented to such department of finance in strict accordance with the laws of the state of Ohio relating thereto.

“Relator avers that said defendant refused and neglected to approve such estimate or to certify the same to the auditor of the state of Ohio or allow the same to be filed with the auditor of the state of Ohio with his approval, and that such refusal was without right, reason, or any justification in law.”

Without discussion of the allegations of the petitions in detail, it is sufficient to say that enough appeal’s therein to show that the relator is without legal remedy, and that, if the well-pleaded allegations of the petitions are true, which the demurrers admit, the relator is entitled to the relief prayed for.

Many legal questions have been argued in these cases which were also argued in disposing of a demurrer in State, *ex rel.,*v. *Herrick, ante,*611, 140 N. E., 314, decided concurrently herewith, and the opinion in that case therefore has application to the present controversies.

*626We shall not attempt to determine at this time what defenses might be made to the allegations of the petitions in these cases, but that matter will be determined in the event the defendant desires to file answers, and for such purpose leave will be given to file answers within five days. The demurrers to the petitions will be overruled.

*Demurrers*overruledJ.

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.

Wanamaker, J., not participating.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 98-620 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

 Protocols Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and JAPAN Extending the 

Agreement of June 20, 1988, as Extended

Signed at Washington June 16, 1998 

Signed at Washington March 19, 1999 

Signed at Washington May 19, 1999 

Signed at Washington July 19, 2004 

and 

Protocol Amending and Extending the Agreement 

Signed at Washington July 16, 1999 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 

 JAPAN 

 Scientific Cooperation 

Protocols extending the agreement of June 20, 1988, 

 as extended. 

Signed at Washington June 16, 1998; 

Entered into force June 20, 1998. 

Signed at Washington March 19, 1999; 

Entered into force March 20, 1999. 

Signed at Washington May 19, 1999; 

Entered into force May 20, 1999. 

Signed at Washington July 19, 2004; 

Entered into force July 20, 2004. 

And protocol amending and extending the 

 agreement. 

Signed at Washington July 16, 1999; 

Entered into force July 20, 1999. 









1
2
3
4
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

TITO GARCIA, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 351 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
#### John CAMPBELL, Petitioner, v. ALCAR ENGINEERING COMPANY, Inc., a foreign corporation, Respondent.

No. 41052.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 13, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed. 244 So.2d 745.
#### Ex parte Walter ARNOLD, Jr.

SC 2629.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 26, 1977.

BEATTY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, FAULKNER and SHORES, JJ., concur.
# $ $ $ $ nmma.org

BOAT BUILDING ACC./SUPPLIES MFGR. MOTOR/ENG. MFGR. DLRS/WHOLESALERS BOAT SERVICES BOAT BUILDING ACC./SUPPLIES MFGR. MOTOR/ENG. MFGR. DLRS/WHOLESALERS BOAT BUILDING ACC./SUPPLIES MFGR. MOTOR/ENG. MFGR. DLRS/WHOLESALERS BOAT SERVICES BOAT SERVICES



### B 963,818 $16.3 $9.9 $13.7 $39.9 

### 313,803

472,594 177,421 

### B 338,526 32,485 78,472 164,338

17,880 45,351 737,509 

### B 12,182,157 9,926,221 249,803 12,182,157 1,268,624
9.4 

# 12,182,157 963,818

34,833 $51.4 BILLION

$6.6 $8.1 

### $30.9 $61.3 $40.7 $16.2 $20.6 

### 34,833 830 3,854 24,445 241 5,463

BILLIONS BILLIONS

0 10 20 30 40 50 Boat Building 

### RECREATIONAL BOATING INDUSTRY SALES IN THE USA Motor / Engine Mfgr. 

### TOTAL MFGR. SALES TOTAL RETAIL & SERVICES SALES Accessory / Supplies Mfgr. Dealers / Wholesalers Boat Services $ 

### 6.6 BILLION

$ 

### 16.2 BILLION

$ 

### 8.1 BILLION

$ 

### 20.6 BILLION $ 

### 40.7 BILLION 

### EST. TOTAL JOBS ESTIMATED JOBS IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL BOATING-RELATED SPENDING IN THE USA

EST. TOTAL LABOR INCOME Est. Direct Income Est. Indirect Income Est. Induced Income INDUCED JOBS INDIRECT JOBS

DIRECT JOBS 

### TOTAL BUSINESSES Boat Building Accessory / Supplies Mfgr. Motor / Engine Mfgr. Dealers / Wholesalers Boat Services 

# 70 % 11 % 

# 16 % 

### RECREATIONAL BOATING-RELATED BUSINESSES IN THE USA 

# 2 % 

# 1 % 

### RECREATIONAL BOATING CREATES JOBS IN THE USA 

# 49 %

13 % 

### TOTAL BOATING JOBS Boat Building Accessory / Supplies Mfgr. Motor / Engine Mfgr. Dealers / Wholesalers Boat Services 

# 23 % 

# 5 % 

# 10 % * Total boats are registered boats as reported by states to the USCG. 

### RECREATIONAL BOATS IN THE USA

POWER BOATS



# 82 % 

# 10 % 

### PWCs 

# 2 % 

### SAILBOATS 

# 6 % 

### OTHER BOATS TOTAL BOATS* Power boats Sailboats PWCs Other Boats REGISTERED BOATS

HOUSEHOLDS PER BOAT

Source: NMMA’s Center of Knowledge; Recreational Marine Research Center at Michigan State University 

# $ 

# 121.5 Number of Recreational Boats* Total Jobs Annual Recreational Boating-Related Spending 

# TOTAL ANNUAL ECONOMIC IMPACT OF RECREATIONAL BOATING: 

## Recreational Boating Industry Businesses

BILLION 

# ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE OF RECREATIONAL BOATING IN 

# THE UNITED STATES
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark E. Lemma, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 (this Amendment) to annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, of ALCiS Health, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this Amendment does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Amendment; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Amendment, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Amendment.

Date: June 29, 2007



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /S/ Mark E. Lemma                    
|    |  | Mark E. Lemma Chief Financial Officer