alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DONALD GRANBERRY, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 04-241 Erie

v. )

)

SUPERINTENDENT BROOKS, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on August 26,

2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 26], filed on

October 26, 2005, recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 3]

be denied as moot and that a certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were

allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on

Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondents. No objections were filed. After de

novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and

Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2005;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 3]

is DENIED as moot, and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 26] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on October 26, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:04-cv-00241-SJM-SPB Document 27 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 1
### Subsurface geology and ground-water resources of the Jackson Purchase region, Kentucky

By: R. W. DavisT. William LambertArnold J. Hansen Jr.

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1987

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (4652 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (1464 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (3609 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 4**                            (1597 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 5**                            (4878 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 6**                            (3320 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 7**                            (3007 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 8**                            (1116 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 9**                            (818 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 10**                            (5377 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 11**                            (807 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[104th Congress Private Law 1]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl001.104]

[[Page 110 STAT. 1]]

Private Law 104-1
104th Congress

                                 An Act

 
     For the relief of Benchmark Rail Group, Inc. <<NOTE: July 24, 
                          1996 -  [H.R. 419]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: California.>> 

SECTION 1. FINDING AND PURPOSE.

    (a) Finding.--The Congress finds that Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., of 
St. Louis, Missouri, satisfactorily performed emergency work after the 
Northridge earthquake, but has not been reimbursed as a result of a 
technicality under California State law.
    (b) Purpose.--The purpose of this Act is to fairly compensate 
Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., for the work for which, except for the 
technicality under California State law, it would otherwise have been 
paid under the provisions of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121).

SEC. 2. PAYMENT.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
shall pay to Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, an 
amount equal to the total amount owed to Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., by 
the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the State of California to 
compensate Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., for the emergency work and 
services performed at the request of the Southern California Regional 
Rail Authority, to the extent that such work and services are otherwise 
eligible for reimbursement under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster and 
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121). The payment shall be made 
from funds appropriated to implement such Act.
    (b) Deobligation of Funds.--The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
shall deobligate an equal amount to that obligated previously for 
payment to the State of California to cover the costs of work performed 
for the Southern California Regional Rail Authority by Benchmark Rail 
Group, Inc., after the Northridge earthquake which would have been 
eligible for reimbursement under such Act.

    Approved July 24, 1996.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ERNESTO SANTIAGO, )

Plaintiff, )

)

Vs. ) Civil Action No. 04-335 Erie

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Defendant. )

O R D E R 

 AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2006, the Plaintiff having failed to produce an 

expert report as Ordered by the Court in a telephonic status conference held on April 21, 2006

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment 

(Document No. 48) be and hereby is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case 

closed

 S/Sean J. McLaughlin 

Sean J. McLaughlin 

United States District Judge

cc: all parties of record. nk

Case 1:04-cv-00335-SJM Document 62 Filed 07/19/06 Page 1 of 1
NOTE

$4,000.00                                                   Date: March 30, 2001


         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, ARCHER SYSTEMS LIMITED, INC., the undersigned
("Payor"), hereby promises to pay to the order of GRQ FINANCIAL, INC., a
Delaware corporation, ("Holder"), the principal amount of $4,000.00, payable
twenty four (24) months after the date first set forth above. The principal
amount hereof from time to time outstanding shall bear interest at the rate of
six percent (6%) per annum, payable on the date set forth above. All payments
hereunder shall be in lawful money of the United States of America at the
address of the Holder hereof or at such address as shall be specified by the
Holder to ARCHER SYSTEMS LIMITED, INC.
                  If any default shall be made in the payment of interest or
principal, then the Holder, by written notice to the Payor, may exercise all of
its legal rights to collect the balance due unless within five (5) business days
after such notice the default shall be cured by Payor. Such notice shall be
deemed given three (3) days after having been deposited in the United States
Mail properly addressed and sent by registered mail to the particular addressee,
return receipt requested.

                  Prepayments may be made in this note voluntarily at any time
and from time to time, without penalty.



                                                   Archer Systems Limited, Inc.


                                                   BY:______________________
                                                      Walter J. Krzanowski
                                                      Secretary/Treasurer


<PAGE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 13, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 13, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24I0186. MICHAEL RICKETTS v. WENDEL P. EL. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 23A02532
#### Doris K. Carver et al., Landlords, Appellants, *v.*Crowe & Co., Inc., Tenant, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

May 22, 1952.

*Irving L. Young*and *Edward Morrison*for appellants.

*Murray H. Yachnin*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

In this summary proceeding for nonpayment of rent, payment by the tenant of the rent due dispensed with the statutory requirement of the entry of a final order for the landlords *(Matter of Flewellin*v. *Lent,*91 App. Div. 431).

The court had no jurisdiction to adjudicate as to the alleged indebtedness of the tenant to the landlords for fuel, which "was no part of the rental obligation.

*900The appeals should be dismissed, without costs, and decision vacated, without prejudice to an action by the landlords to recover the fuel charge.

Hofstadteb, Edeb and Schbeibeb, JJ., concur.

Appeals dismissed, etc.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Donald J. EDWARDS, Michael A. Shepherd, John N. Kent.

No. 61987.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 18, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for supervisory writs. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction.
Order entered May 20, 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00578

- CV

IN RE RODNEY JAMES R OHRICH, M.D., Rela t or

Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial Distric t Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 17

- 15886



### O RDER

Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Reichek

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
# Jornal Oficial C 168I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 168I |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 64.° ano5 de maio de 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 168I

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

64.° ano5 de maio de 2021

---

| Índice | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Comunicações |
| | DECLARAÇÕES COMUNS |
| | Parlamento EuropeuConselho |
| 2021/C 168 I/01 | Declaração comum do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho sobre o financiamento da vertente valores da União em 2021 | 1 |

Índice

Página

II   Comunicações

DECLARAÇÕES COMUNS

Parlamento EuropeuConselho

2021/C 168 I/01

Declaração comum do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho sobre o financiamento da vertente valores da União em 2021

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

II Comunicações

DECLARAÇÕES COMUNS

Parlamento Europeu Conselho

| 5.5.2021 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CI 168/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2021

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CI 168/1

---

Declaração comum do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho sobre o financiamento da vertente «valores da União» em 2021

(2021/C 168 I/01)

Sem prejuízo das competências da autoridade orçamental, os colegisladores acordam em que a vertente «valores da União» do Programa «Cidadãos, Igualdade, Direitos e Valores» deverá estar dotada de financiamento substancial a partir de 1 de janeiro de 2021.

Os colegisladores convidam a Comissão a tomar medidas adequadas para concretizar este objetivo, em particular para avaliar a utilização de instrumentos de flexibilidade ao abrigo do quadro jurídico do orçamento anual da UE para 2021, em conformidade com os critérios de ativação estabelecidos no regulamento QFP.

---
Attachment VIII

Supplemental Support Documents
PUBLIC LAW 113–31—AUG. 9, 2013 127 STAT. 511 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2611: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113–153 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 159 (2013): 

July 16, considered and passed House. 

July 30, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–31 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus located 

at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the District of Columbia 

as the ‘‘Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters Building’’, and for other 

purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus 

located at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in 

the District of Columbia shall be known and designated as the 

‘‘Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the building referred to 

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Douglas 

A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters Building’’. 

Approved August 9, 2013. 

14 USC 1 note. 

Aug. 9, 2013 

[H.R. 2611] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          $3,829
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  $67,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    $11,875
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               $88,403
<PP&E>                                        $720,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                 $29,799
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $1,453,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         $374,455
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       $79,229
<OTHER-SE>                                  $1,463,562
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                $1,453,021
<SALES>                                       $213,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              $231,691
<CGS>                                         $140,673
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $323,728
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              $162,139
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              $5,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                $(124,888)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   $(.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $(.02)


</TABLE>
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 96-531 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EDUCATION 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and POLAND 

Signed at Warsaw October 20, 1995 

and 

Agreement Extending the Agreement 

Effected by Exchange of Notes at 

Warsaw October 28 and 

November 25, 2005 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 

 POLAND 

 Education 

Agreement signed at Warsaw October 20, 1995; 

Entered into force May 31, 1996. 

And agreement extending the agreement. 

Effected by exchange of notes at Warsaw 

 October 28 and November 25, 2005; 

Entered into force November 25, 2005.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

DEAN SASANKO, I 

Petitioner, 

v. 

MARILYN BROOKS, et al., 

Civil Action No. 04-307 Erie 

Respondents. 

MEMORANDUM ORDER 

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on October 19, 

2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for 

11 report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(I), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 71, filed on 

January 12, 2006, recommended that Petitioner's Petition dismissed and that a 

11 certificate of appealability be denied. The parties were allowed ten (1 0) days from the 11 date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and 

11 on Defendants. Objections were filed on January 27, 2006 [Doc. No. 91. After de novo 11 review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and 

Recommendation, and objections thereto, the following order is entered: 

AND NOW, this 31" day of January, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiffs Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 

11 [Doc. No. I] is DISMISSED and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 71 of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed 

on January 12, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. 

sl Sean J. McLaughlin United States District Judge 

cm: All parties of record 

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 1:04-cv-00307-SJM-SPB Document 10 Filed 01/31/06 Page 1 of 1
#### Ray V. DREGGORS, Petitioner, v. VOLUSIA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, DISTRICT # 3 et al., Respondents.

No. 40463.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 17, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | To      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the Company.  |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      16, 2009 | /s/      John V. Moran       |   | /s/      Jeffery G. Hough            |   |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 | John      V. Moran           |   | Jeffery      G. Hough                |   |
|                                 | Chief      Executive Officer |   | Senior      Vice President and Chief |   |
|                                 |                         |   | Financial      Officer               |   |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2229]


Petitions for Reconsideration of Action In Rulemaking Proceedings

September 25, 1997.
    Petitions for reconsideration have been filed in the Commission's 
rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of these documents 
are available for viewing and copying in Room 239, 1919 M Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to these petitions 
must be filed October 17, 1997. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the 
Commission's rule (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be 
filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired.
    Subject: Amendment of Parts 2, 15, and 97 of the Commission's Rules 
To Permit Use of Radio Frequencies Above 40 GHz for New Radio 
Applications (ET Docket No. 94-124, RM-8308).
    International Harmonization or Frequency Bands Above 40 GHz.
    Petition of Sky Station International, Inc. For Amendment of the 
Commission's Rules To Establish Requirements for a Global Stratospheric 
Telecommunications Service in the 47.2-47.5 GHz and 47.9-48.2 GHz 
Frequency Bands (RM-8784).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.
    Subject: The Commission's Forfeiture Policy Statement and Amendment 
of Section 1.80 of Rules to Incorporate the Forfeiture Guidelines (CI 
Docket 95-6).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 2.
Federal Communications Commission.
Shirley Suggs,
Chief, Publications Branch
[FR Doc. 97-26055 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 14, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-996 Lower Tribunal No. F88-21370A

________________ 

### Felix de la Hoz, Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Teresa Pooler, Judge. Felix de la Hoz, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before LINDSEY, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.