alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

FARRAH KELLY, 

Plaintiff, 

 v. 

JOSHUA BELL, JUSTIN SNYDER, and 

CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT, 

Defendants. 

 No. 4:22-CV-01940 

(Chief Judge Brann) 

ORDER 

APRIL 28, 2023 

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7) is GRANTED IN 

PART, DENIED IN PART as follows: 

1. The motion to dismiss as to Count I (Fourth Amendment) and Count

II (Monell claim) is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE.

2. The motion to dismiss as to Count III (Fifth Amendment) is DENIED.

3. Consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, the Defendants are

directed to file an Answer by May 12, 2023.

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:22-cv-01940-JKM Document 11 Filed 04/28/23 Page 1 of 1
#### Howard MICHNICK, Petitioner, v. *Perle*V. MICHNICK, etc., Respondent.

No. 40512.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 12, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed.
STATE OF COLORI\DO 

John W. Hickenlooper. Governor 

Larry Wolk, MD, MSPH 

Executive Director and Chief Medical Officer 

Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado 

4300 Cherry Creek Dr. S. 

Denver, Colorado 80246-1530 

Phone (303) 692-2000 

Located in Glendale, Colorado 

www.colorado.gov/cdphe 

January 3, 2014 

Sadie Hoskie, Director 

Water Program 

U.S. EPA, Region VIII 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

Denver, CO 80227-8917 

Re: Section 401 Water Quality Certification 

MSGP General Permit 

Dear Ms. Hoskie: 

Colorado Depanment 

of Public Health 

and Environment 

The Water Quality Control Division (Division) has reviewed the above NPDES general permit. 

Provided the facilities covered under the general permit comply with the permit conditions, the Division 

is reasonably assured the Colorado Water Quality Control Act will not be violated by these activities. If 

the permit changes from the public notice version, based on comments received during public notice, the 

Division would like to be informed of these changes as they may render this determination null and 

void. 

This certification does not constitute a relinquishment of the Division's authority as delineated in the 

"Colorado Water Quality Control Act," or any subsequent alterations thereto, nor does it fulfill or waive 

any other local, state or federal regulations. 

If you have any questions, please give me a call at 303-692-3555 

/ 

Nathan Moore 

Unit Manager 

Compliance Unit 2 

Water Quality Control Division 

Cc: Greg Davis, EPA Region 8 (electronic)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2593]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
(I.D. 012797C)


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) and its 
Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Committee and its 
Comprehensive Management Committee will hold a public meeting. 

DATES: Tuesday, February 18, to Thursday, February 20, 1997. On 
Tuesday, the Atlantic Mackerel, Squid, and Butterfish Committee will 
meet from 1:00-4:00 p.m. On Wednesday, the Council will meet from 8:00 
a.m. until 4:00 p.m., at which time the Comprehensive Management 
Committee will meet until 5:00 p.m. On Thursday, the Council will meet 
from 8:00 a.m. until approximately noon.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held at the Sheraton Atlantic City 
West, 6821 Black Horse Pike, Atlantic City, NJ 08232, telephone 1-800-
782-9237.
    Council Address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 300 S. 
New Street, Dover, DE 19901, telephone 302-674-2331.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David R. Keifer, Executive Director, 
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; telephone: 302-674-2331.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this meeting is to discuss 
the Council's joint venture processing policy and the 1997 Atlantic 
mackerel joint venture processing specifications, hear a report on the 
Stock Assessment Workshop, discuss NMFS proposed regulations concerning 
essential fish habitat, have a presentation on NMFS proposed weakfish 
regulations, discuss vessel replacement criteria in Comprehensive 
Management, possible adoption of Amendment 1 to the Bluefish Fishery 
Management Plan for public hearings, and other fishery management 
matters. In addition, there will be discussion regarding Mr. 
Schmitten's inquiry into the rebuilding schedule of summer flounder 
during the Executive Director's Report.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Joanna Davis at least five days prior to the 
meeting dates.

    Dated: January 28, 1997.
Bruce Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-2593 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,695
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,854
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,490
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,854
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,497)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.003)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2068 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2068

 To preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District 
                              of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 2005

Ms. Collins (for herself, Mr. Voinovich, and Mr. Akaka) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of the District 
                              of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPOSITION OF SUPERIOR COURT.

    Section 903 of title 11 of the District of Columbia Code is amended 
by striking ``fifty-eight'' and inserting ``61''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50302-50303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25383]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-190-010]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

September 19, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 16, 1997, Colorado Interstate Gas 
Company (CIG), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed in the 
Appendix A to the filing, to be effective October 1, 1997.
    CIG states it is making this filing to implement lower rates for 
all of its jurisdictional services pending final Commission approval of 
the uncontested Settlement filed by CIG in Docket No. RP-190 on August 
27, 1997 and certified to the Commission on September 10, 1997. CIG 
further states that Section 2.10 of the August 27, 1997 Settlement 
provides for the filing of this interim rate reduction. The Settlement 
also makes it clear that if the Commission modifies or rejects the

[[Page 50303]]

August 27 Settlement and, as a result, the August 27 Settlement is 
never implemented, CIG can implement surcharges and/or refunds to 
reflect revenue recovery that would have occurred if this interim rate 
reduction had not gone into effect.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25383 Filed 9-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 05-02700-MBM Doc 30 Filed 05/19/06 Entered 05/19/06 13:39:15 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 10
Case 05-02700-MBM Doc 30 Filed 05/19/06 Entered 05/19/06 13:39:15 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 10
Case 05-02700-MBM Doc 30 Filed 05/19/06 Entered 05/19/06 13:39:15 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 10
Case 05-02700-MBM Doc 30 Filed 05/19/06 Entered 05/19/06 13:39:15 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 10
Case 05-02700-MBM Doc 30 Filed 05/19/06 Entered 05/19/06 13:39:15 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 10
Case 05-02700-MBM Doc 30 Filed 05/19/06 Entered 05/19/06 13:39:15 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 10
Case 05-02700-MBM Doc 30 Filed 05/19/06 Entered 05/19/06 13:39:15 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 10
Case 05-02700-MBM Doc 30 Filed 05/19/06 Entered 05/19/06 13:39:15 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 10
Case 05-02700-MBM Doc 30 Filed 05/19/06 Entered 05/19/06 13:39:15 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 10
Case 05-02700-MBM Doc 30 Filed 05/19/06 Entered 05/19/06 13:39:15 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 10
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25526]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 2607]


International Telecommunications Advisory Committee; 
Telecommunications Development Sector (ITAC-D) Group Meeting Notice

    The Department of State announces the United States International 
Telecommunications Advisory Committee (ITAC) Telecommunications 
Development Sector (ITAC-D) Group will meet over the next several 
months to prepare for the upcoming International Telecommunications 
Union (ITU) World Telecommunication Development Conference scheduled 
for March 23-April 1, 1998 in Valletta, Malta. First preparatory 
meeting is scheduled for Friday, October 17, 1997, Room 1408, U.S. 
Department of State.
    The agenda for the preparatory meeting is to discuss and review 
proposals to the Conference regarding the Development Sector's mission 
and strategic plan, its structure and methods of work and the 
priorities for the programme 1999-2003. U.S. proposals for new Study 
Group questions will also be discussed. It is expected that ad hoc 
committees will be formed at the first meeting to work on specialized 
or specific topics.
    Questions regarding the meeting may be addressed to Ms. Doreen 
McGirr at 202-647-0201. If you wish to attend please send a fax to 202-
647-7407 no later than two days before the scheduled meeting. Please 
include your name, Social Security number and date of birth. One of the 
following valid photo ID's will be required for admittance: U.S. 
driver's license with picture, U.S. passport, U.S. Government ID 
(company ID's are no longer accepted by Diplomatic Security). Enter 
from the ``C'' Street Main Lobby.

    Dated: September 17, 1997.
Doreen F. McGirr,
Chair of ITAC-D.
[FR Doc. 97-25526 Filed 9-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-45-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

This certification set forth below is hereby made solely for thepurpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any otherpurposes.

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Ezenia! Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Khoa D. Nguyen,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date: March 30, 2010 | /s/ Khoa D. Nguyen      |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|
|                      | Khoa D. Nguyen          |
|                      | Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2674 

To amend the Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions 

Act of 1994 to increase transparency and accountability regarding the 

operations of the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2023 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. WARNER, Mr. CRAPO, and Mr. WARNOCK) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994 to increase transparency 

and accountability regarding the operations of the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CDFI Fund Trans5 parency Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO TESTIFY. 

7 Section 104(b) of the Community Development 

8 Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994 (12 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2674 IS

1 U.S.C. 4703(b)) is amended by adding to the end the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(5) ANNUAL TESTIMONY.—The Secretary of 

4 the Treasury (or a designee of the Secretary) shall, 

5 at the discretion of the chairman of the Committee 

6 on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Sen7 ate and chairman of the Committee on Financial 

8 Services of the House of Representatives, annually 

9 testify before such committees (or a subcommittee of 

10 such committees) regarding the operations of the 

11 Fund during the previous fiscal year.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1999-KYZEN CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         589,039
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  650,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,334
<INVENTORY>                                    445,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,754,721
<PP&E>                                       1,711,180
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,037,635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,638,306
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          507,292
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,018
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,079,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,638,306
<SALES>                                      5,759,850
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,759,850
<CGS>                                        2,454,502
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,454,502
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (370,732)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (370,732)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (370,732)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.07)


</TABLE>
#### Dorothy DISNEY, Appellant, v. The PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellee.

No. L-437.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Dec. 9, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 14, 1970.

Isler, Welch, Bryant, Smith & Higby, Panama City, for appellant.

Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis; Pensacola, and Mercer P. Spear, Panama City, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The court having considered the record, briefs, and argument of counsel and it appearing that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error, the decree hereby appealed is therefore affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20329 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. DON RAY VICTORIA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CR-377-ALL
Before DAVIS, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Don Ray Victoria presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), which rejec ted a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (2006). Appellant’s motion for summary disposition isGRANTED, and thejudgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 5, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. James Elwood NEAL, sometimes known as James Edward Neal, Honorable Robert L. Williams, as Circuit Judge of the Sixth Judicial Circuit of Florida, in and for Pinellas County, Florida, Respondents.

No. 69-570.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 3, 1969.

James T. Russell, State’s Atty., and Jerry D. Bell, Asst. State’s Atty., Clearwater, for petitioner.

Philip J. Rogers, of Masterson, Lloyd, Sundberg & Rogers, St. Petersburg, for respondent Neal.

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the record and the briefs in the instant case, we are of the opinion that State v. Drayton, Fla.App.1969, 226 So.2d 469; State v. Williams (Fla.App.2d), 227 So.2d 253, Opinion filed October 3, 1969; and State v. Gillespie (Fla.App.2d), 227 So.2d 550, Opinion filed October 31, 1969, control. We therefore uphold the trial court’s Order to Produce.

Certiorari denied.

LILES, Acting C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
#### POLK COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. James R. DEATON et al., Appellees.

No. 77-1099.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 30, 1977.

*572Carolyn K. Fulmer, Bartow, for appellant.

Michael D. Martin, Lakeland, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal, Polk County argues that the trial court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to the appellees in this case. We agree and reverse on that point.

James R. Deaton and others filed a complaint alleging that a storm water detention pond which Polk County had built constituted a nuisance. They asked the court to award damages and abate the nuisance by ordering its removal. After several hearings, the court entered final judgment in which it denied damages, and allowed the pond to remain with modifications. The judgment also awarded $3000 in attorney’s fees to appellees.

An award for attorney’s fees is only proper where authorized by contract, where authorized by legislative enactment, or where awarded for services performed in creating or bringing into court a fund or other property. *Kittel v. Kittel,*210 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1968). We cannot find nor have appellees demonstrated that any of these circumstances apply to the present case.

Moreover, we reject appellees’ contention that *Department of Citrus v. Griffin,*332 So.2d 54 (Fla.2d DCA 1976), controls here. It is true that in this case, as in *Griffin,*there was successful litigation which benefited a great number of people. However, unlike the case sub judice, *Griffin*contained the element of a fund from which the Court could award attorney’s fees. No such fund is available in this case.

In view of this, we vacate that part of the final judgment which awards attorney’s fees and affirm the judgment in all other respects.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and OTT and DANAHY, JJ., concur.