alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25816]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-525-000]


CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice of Section 4 Filing

September 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 17, 1997, CNG Transmission 
Corporation (CNG) tendered for filing pursuant to Section 4 of the 
Natural Gas Act, a notice of termination of service on line H-13805 in 
Sherman District, Calhoun County, West Virginia.
    CNG states that it is selling this line to Pocono Energy 
Corporation. CNG further states that no contract for transportation 
service with CNG will be canceled or terminated as a result of the 
proposed abandonment of service.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure. Under section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulation, all such motions or protests should be filed on or before 
September 29, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25816 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.8


                              SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                           COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION
                        BROAD BASED 2000 INCENTIVE PLAN


     WHEREAS, COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION (the "Company") has heretofore adopted
the BROAD BASED 2000 INCENTIVE PLAN (the "Broad Based Plan); and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Board Based Plan in certain
respects;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Broad Based Plan shall be amended as follows, effective
July 24, 2001:

     1.  Subsection 2.13 of the Broad Based Plan shall be amended by adding
"Chief Executive Officer or the" before the word "Committee".

     2.  The words "delegate to the Chief Executive Officer the authority to
select Participants for and determine the shares subject to Stock Option Grants;
to specify the total number of rights or options that may be awarded by the
Chief Executive Officer, to select the Participants for and determine the shares
or cash subject to Restricted Stock Awards or Performance Awards" for the words
"select the Participants; to determine the type of Awards to be made to
Participants; to determine the shares or cash subject to any Award and", in
Subsection 3.2 of the Broad Based Plan.



                                                APPROVED:

                                                /s/ William C. Lemmer
                                                ________________________________
                                                William C. Lemmer
                                                Vice President, General Counsel
                                                 and Secretary

                                                Date:  July 24, 2001
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Injuries and Accident Causes in Plumbing Operations: A Detailed Analysis of Accidents Experienced by Plumbers During 1948 and 1949

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Injuries and Accident Causes in Plumbing Operations: A Detailed Analysis of Accidents Experienced by Plumbers During 1948 and 1949 : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1079*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1952,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4435,			accessed on September 18, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
VI 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2194 

For the relief of Nadezda Shestakova. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2006 

Mr. STEVENS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Nadezda Shestakova. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101 et seq.), Nadezda Shestakova shall be held and con7 sidered to have been lawfully admitted to the United 

8 States for permanent residence as of the date of the enact9 ment of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee. 

10 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

11 Upon the granting of permanent residence to 

12 Nadezda Shestakova as provided in this Act, the Secretary 
2 

•S 2194 IS

1 of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1 

2 during the current fiscal year the total number of immi3 grant visas available to natives of the country of the alien’s 

4 birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nation5 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)). 

Æ
255 La. 816

#### Dan A. RITCHEY, Jr., et ux. v. LAKE CHARLES DREDGING & TOWING CO., Inc., Zurben Thibodeaux d/b/a Thibodeaux Shell Yard, B & M Material Sales, Inc., and Radcliff Materials, Inc.

No. 50446.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 3, 1970.

In re: Dan A. Ritchey, Jr., et ux. applying for certiorari, or writ of reyiew, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 230 So.2d 346.

The application is denied. According to the facts of this case as disclosed in the opinion of the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
### Reconnaissance for radioactive deposits in the Eagle-Nation area, east-central Alaska, 1948

By: Helmuth Wedow

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir316

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Case 14-02176-GLT Doc 304 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 16:58:33 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 12
Case 14-02176-GLT Doc 304 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 16:58:33 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 12
Case 14-02176-GLT Doc 304 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 16:58:33 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 12
Case 14-02176-GLT Doc 304 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 16:58:33 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 12
Case 14-02176-GLT Doc 304 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 16:58:33 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 12
Case 14-02176-GLT Doc 304 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 16:58:33 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 12
Case 14-02176-GLT Doc 304 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 16:58:33 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 12
Case 14-02176-GLT Doc 304 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 16:58:33 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 12
Case 14-02176-GLT Doc 304 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 16:58:33 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 12
Case 14-02176-GLT Doc 304 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 16:58:33 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 12
Case 14-02176-GLT Doc 304 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 16:58:33 Desc Main

Document Page 11 of 12
Case 14-02176-GLT Doc 304 Filed 08/30/16 Entered 08/30/16 16:58:33 Desc Main

Document Page 12 of 12
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR 8-HOUR OZONE RACT SIP SU BMITTAL Planning Area: Feather River Air Quality Managemen t District Title 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix V – Criteria for Determining the Completeness

of Plan Submissions Enclosed Notes

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS 2.1(a) Submittal Letter from Governor's Designee X See ARB Executive Order G-125-346.

2.1(b) Evidence of Adoption X See Feather River Air Quality Management District Board’s Resolution No. 2006-10 as certified by Board Clerk. 2.1(c) Legal Authority Citation X See ARB Executiv e Order G-125-346. 2.1(d) Copy of :

a. Attainment Plan b: Contingency Measures Not applicable

2.1(e) Evidence of Compliance with State's Procedural Requirements X See Feather River Air Quality Management District Board Resolution No. 2006-10 as certified by Board Clerk and ARB Executive Order G-125- 346. 2.1(f) Evidence of Public Notice Consistent with 40 CFR part 51.102 X See attachment 3 of the District submittal. 2.1(g) Certification of Public Hearing in Accordance with Notice X See attachment 3 of the District submittal. 2.1(h) Compilation of Public Comments and Responses There were no comments.

2.2(a) Identification of Regulated Pollutant Not applicable.
2.2(b) Identification of Attainment Area/Status N ot applicable.
2.2(c) Estimate of Plan's Impact on Emissions Not applicable.
2.2(d) Demonstration that Plan Approval/Implementation Protects NAAQS Not applicable.
2.2(e) Modeling Support Not applicable. 2.2(f)- Compliance/Enforcement and 2.2(i) Justification Not applicable.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49295-49296]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24961]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission to OMB for Review; Comment Request

September 15, 1997.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by

[[Page 49296]]

calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Officer listed. Comments 
regarding this information collection should be addressed to the OMB 
reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department Clearance Officer, 
Department of the Treasury, Room 2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-0203.
    Form Number: IRS Form 5329.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: Additional Taxes Attributable to Qualified Retirement Plans 
(Including IRAs), Annuities, Modified Endowment Contracts, and MSAs.
    Description: This form is used to compute and collect taxes related 
to distribution from individual retirement arrangements (IRAs) and 
other qualified plans. These taxes are for excess contributions to an 
IRA, premature distributions from an IRA and other qualified retirement 
plans, excess accumulations in an IRA and excess distributions from 
qualified retirement plans. The data is used to help verify that the 
correct amount of tax has been paid.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 1,000,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper: 

Recordkeeping--40 minutes
Learning about the law or the form--22 minutes
Preparing the form--35 minutes
Copying, assembling, and sending the form to the IRS--35 minutes

    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 2,190,000 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-24961 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
#### Spencer D. HUDSON v. W. E. WIMBERLY et al.

No. 45707.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 23, 1970.

Stanford Young, Waynesboro, for appellant.

William Vol Jones, Jr., W. Vol Jones, Waynesboro, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Twinview, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Patrick K. Hogle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of the
           operation of the Company.


/s/ Patrick K. Hogle
_________________________________
Patrick K. Hogle
Chief Executive Officer
October 28, 2003
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

I N R E: ERI C F L OR ES,

Relator. § § § § § No . 0 8- 09 -0 02 65 -C R AN ORI GI

NAL PROCEEDI

NG I N MANDA MUS

MEMORAN DUM OP INION ON P ETIT ION F OR WRIT OF M ANDAM US Relator, Eric Flore s, seeks a writ of m andamus to compe l the Honora ble David Gua derr ama, J udg e of the 243rd J udicial District Court, to discontinue “adva ncing the private interest of a person
na me d [omi tte d] to c on ve y the imp re ssi on that he is in a sp e c ia l po sit ion to f ri vo l- [sic ] fr ivo lou sly portray to be an a ssistant dist rict attorne y for t h e purpose of prose cuting [R elator] without due proce ss of law.” I n order to obtain relief throug h a writ of m andamus, a rela tor must establish: (1) no other
a de qu a te re me dy

a t la w i s a va ila

ble a nd (2 ) t ha t the a c t he se e ks to c omp e l is min ist e ri a l. State ex rel. Y oung v. Sixth Judic ial Dist. C ourt of Appeals At Texarkana , 236 S.W .3d 2 07, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007). An ac t is mi nisterial if it d o es n o t i n v o l v e the e x erc ise of any discretion. State ex r el

. Hi ll v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Distri ct , 34 S.W .3d 924, 927 (Tex.Crim.App. 20 01 ). B a se d on the pe tit ion a nd re c or d pr ov ide d, Mr
. F lor e s ha s no t de mon str a te d he is e nti tle d to mandamus re lief. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 52.8. W e ther efor e deny rela tor’s re quest.November 12, 2009 ANN CRAWFORD McCL URE, J ustice B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l u r e , a n d R i v e r a , JJ. (Do Not Publish)
EXHIBIT 10.3


                    FIRST AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT


         THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION  AGREEMENT  ("Amendment")  is made
effective  as of the 19th day of December by and  between Tom M.  Djokovich,  an
individual ("Optionor"),  and NET INTEGRATED SYSTEMS LTD., a Bermuda corporation
("Optionee").   Optionor  and/or  Optionee  are  sometimes  herein  referred  to
individually as a "party" and collectively as the "parties."

         This Amendment  shall, and hereby does, amend that certain Stock Option
Agreement  by and between  the parties  hereto  which was made  effective  as of
December  14, 2001  ("Agreement")  so that  notwithstanding  the  provisions  of
Section 1 of the  Agreement,  if the Option (as  defined  in the  Agreement)  is
exercised  because  of an Event of  Default  which  remains  uncured  under that
certain Secured Loan Agreement between Optionee and Accesspoint  Corporation,  a
Nevada  corporation  ("APC"),  and  Optionor  determines  to direct the exercise
proceeds to APC, the exercise  price shall be the lesser of the then fair market
price as quoted on the  Over-The-Counter  Bulletin Board or Two Dollars  ($2.00)
per share.  Section 1, entitled Option Granted, of the Agreement shall be deemed
amended and revised accordingly. The remaining provisions of the Agreement shall
remain unchanged.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  this Amendment is made effective on the date first
set forth above. All provisions of this Amendment are hereby  incorporated  into
the  Agreement.  This  Amendment is to be attached to the Agreement and become a
part of the Agreement.  This Amendment and the Agreement  shall be read together
as a single document.  The provisions contained in this Amendment shall supplant
and replace any conflicting provisions in the Agreement.  The provisions in this
Amendment  shall control over any conflicting  provisions in the Agreement.  All
non-conflicting  provisions  contained  in  the  Agreement  shall  survive  this
Amendment and remain in full force and effect when read in conjunction with this
Amendment.  This  Amendment  may be  executed  simultaneously  in  one  or  more
counterparts,  each of  which  shall be  deemed  an  original,  but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


                                    OPTIONOR:

                                    [NAME]

                                    By:/s/ TOM M. DJOKOVICH
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Tom M. Djokovich, an individual



                                    OPTIONEE:

                                    NET INTEGRATED SYSTEMS LTD.


                                    By:/s/ WILLIAM R. BARBER
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    William R. Barber, President



                                        1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

98 

KA 08-00347 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LATISHA WEBB, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (WILLIAM G. PIXLEY OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (STEPHEN X. O’BRIEN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County

(Francis A. Affronti, J.), rendered November 21, 2007. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of burglary in the

second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her upon her

plea of guilty of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25

[2]), defendant contends that Supreme Court abused its discretion in

refusing to consider relevant factors during the sentencing

proceeding, such as her drug addiction, and thus erred in imposing an

enhanced sentence. Defendant failed to move to withdraw the plea or

to vacate the judgment of conviction on that ground and thus has

failed to preserve her contention for our review (see People v Reed,

78 AD3d 1534; People v Ortiz, 43 AD3d 1348, lv denied 9 NY3d 1008;

People v Mariani, 6 AD3d 1206, lv denied 3 NY3d 643), and we decline

to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of

discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). We

reject defendant’s further challenge to the severity of the sentence

and decline her request to reduce the sentence as a matter of

discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]; see

generally People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302). 

Entered: February 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
RB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0583

KAHANE THOMAS BEAVERS,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time

to and including October 22, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file the 

State’s response.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 17 2020

09/17/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0583