USA Banner
  U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Here's how you knowOfficial US Government Icon
              **Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
            Secure Site Icon
              **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
 U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation
 Search DOT
            Search
                    About FHWAFHWA Organization
                Headquarters Offices
                Field Offices
                Strategic Plan
                Business Opportunities
                Staff Directories
                Careers
                Highway History
                Contact UsProgramsAcquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                Safety
                Browse by TopicsResourcesCore Highway Topics
                Federal Aid Essentials
                Automation
                Complete Streets
                Laws and Regulations
                Policy & Guidance Center
                Section 508
                Publications and Statistics
                Professional Development
                National Highway Institute
                Resource Center
                Accessibility Resource Library
                FHWA Research LibraryNewsroomPress Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Photos
                Videos
                Media ContactsMenu FHWA Highway Safety Programs Home
                        Safety
                        Roadway Departure Safety
                        Reduce Crash Severity
                        Hardware Eligibility Letters


            
            In This Section
        Roadway Departure Safety
                Strategic Approach
                                Strategic Plan
                Crash Emphasis Brochures
                Focused Approach
                Noteworthy Practices
                Partner Resources
                Keep Vehicles on the Road
                                Pavement Friction
                Horizontal Curve Safety
                Rumble Strips and Rumble Stripes
                Nighttime Visibility
                Provide for a Safe Recovery
                                SafetyEdge
                Clear Zones
                Reduce Crash Severity
                                Overview
                Hardware Eligibility Letters
                Focus on Reducing Rural Roadway Departures (FoRRRwD)
                                Overview
                All Public Roads
                Proven Countermeasures
                Systemic Approach
                Safety Action Plans
                FoRRRwD Resources
                
                Safety Eligibility Letter CC-12Q
  
  **Hardware Type:**
            Barrier Terminals and Crash Cushions
                          **Code:**
            CC-12Q
                          **Date:**
            03/15/2010
                          **Testing Criteria:**
            NCHRP 350
                          **Manufacturer:**
            Trinity Hwy Prod
                          **Device Description:**
            ET-Plus and ET-Plus 31 with 2 Breakaway Posts
                          **View PDF:**
            cc12q.pdf (493.78 KB)
    
    Safety Eligibility Letter - CC-12Q

**Download Version**PDF [88 KB]

DOT logo
U.S. Department of Transportation**Federal Highway Administration**

1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E.
Washington, D.C. 20590

March 15, 2010

In Reply Refer to: HSSD/CC-12Q

Mr. Steve Brown
President
Trinity Highway Products, LLC
2525 N. Stemmons Freeway
Dallas, TX 75207

Dear Mr. Brown:

This letter is in response to your request for the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) acceptance of roadside safety devices for use on the National Highway System (NHS).

Name of devices: ET-Plus and ET-Plus 31 with 2 Breakaway Posts
	Type of devices: W-Beam Guardrail Terminals
	Test Level: NCHRP Report 350 Test Level 3
	Testing by: Texas Transportation Institute
	Date of request: June 2, 2009
	Date all information received. October 21, 2009You requested that we find these devices acceptable for use on the NHS under the provisions of National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 “Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features.”

**Requirements**
Roadside safety devices should meet the guidelines contained in the NCHRP Report 350 FHWA Memorandum “Action: Identifying Acceptable Highway Safety Features” of July 25, 1997, provides further guidance on crash testing requirements of longitudinal barriers.

**Description**
The ET-Plus and ET-Plus 31 have been successfully crash tested and accepted by the FHWA, most recently in FHWA Acceptance CC-12J, dated June 24, 2002, CC-12L, dated April 11, 2003, and CC-94, dated September 2, 2005. The use of one anchor post and subsequent transition to standard line posts were the same in these two w-beam guardrail terminals. The obvious difference is the use of seven additional breakaway posts and the 27 5/8-inch rail height in the ET-Plus and five additional breakaway posts and 31-inch rail height in the ET-Plus 31. Recent full scale crash tests have demonstrated that an 820C vehicle can safely ride down full strength W6x8.5 steel line posts that are not rigidly connected to the w-beam rail. Your present request is to replace the last six breakaway posts in ET-Plus and the last 4 breakaway posts in the ET-31with these standard W6x8.5 line posts.

**Crash Testing**
In the safety performance evaluation of these new designs, full-scale crash tests were not conducted on either revised design. NCHRP recommends a total of up to 7 full-scale crash tests for gating guardrail terminals. We concur that none of these tests is needed to verify the safety performance of the proposed new terminal designs, as summarized below.

Test 3-30 involves an 820C vehicle striking the end of the terminal at a speed of 100 km/hr with 1⁄4 offset and an angle of 0°. Recent full scale crash tests have demonstrated that an 820C vehicle can safely ride down full strength W6x8.5 steel line posts. Hence, Test 3-31 is not necessary for evaluating the performance of the new terminal designs.

Test 3-31 involves a 2000P vehicle striking the end of the terminal at 100 km/h and 0°. Numerous full-scale crash tests have shown that the 2000P vehicle is capable of riding down full strength guardrail posts. Further, the previous results of test 3-30 provide a much better indication of the consequences of a vehicle striking an unmodified line post. Thus, Test 3-31 is not necessary for evaluating the performance of the new terminal designs.

Test 3-32 requires an 820C vehicle striking the end of the terminal at 100 km/h and an angle of 15°. Historically the third post in a tangent energy absorbing terminal has not been broken during this impact. Nothing was changed upstream of post #3 from the systems that were approved previously. Therefore, we concur there is no need to conduct this test.

Test 3-33 incorporates the same impact conditions as test 3-32 with a 2000P vehicle. This test is not necessary for the same reasons that Test 3-32 is not required.

Test 3-34 involves an 820C vehicle striking the terminal at its critical impact point at a speed of 100 km/h and an angle of 15°. Previous 3-34 testing was successfully conducted on ET-Plus (HSA-10/CC-12J) with W8x10 breakaway Steel Yielding Terminal Posts (SYTP)] at post locations 2 through 8. Also, this test was successfully conducted with another terminal at a greater impact angle than would be required with the ET-Plus and ET-31. Therefore, we concur there is no need to conduct this test.

Test 3-35 examines the safety performance of the terminal for impacts at the beginning of the length-of-need. This test involves a 2000P striking at the beginning of length-of-need. Previous 3-35 testing was successfully conducted on ET-Plus and ET-Plus 31 with breakaway posts (SYTP) at post locations 2 through 8 and 2 through 6 respectively. Therefore, 3-35 testing on the terminals with full strength W6x8.5 steel line posts at post location 3 and beyond is not required.

Test 3-39 involves a 2000P vehicle impacting the midpoint of the terminal in a reverse direction at a speed of 100 km/h and an angle of 20°. As mentioned above the 2000P test vehicle has been shown to be capable of riding down a full strength line post without posing serious threats to the occupants. Hence this test is also considered to be unnecessary.

In these tests we concur that the performance of the last six breakaway posts in the ET-Plus and the last 4 breakaway posts in the ET-31 terminals would not have been adversely affected by replacing the yielding posts with standard line posts.

**Findings**
The modified ET-Plus and ET-Plus 31 described above and detailed in the enclosed drawings are acceptable for use on the NHS under the range of conditions tested, when acceptable to a highway agency.

Please note the following standard provisions that apply to FHWA letters of acceptance:

This acceptance is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the devices and does not cover their structural features, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
	Any changes that may adversely influence the crashworthiness of the device will require a new acceptance letter.
	Should the FHWA discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in-service performance reveals unacceptable safety problems, or that the device being marketed is significantly different from the version that was crash tested, we reserve the right to modify or revoke our acceptance.
	You will be expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design and installation requirements to ensure proper performance.
	You will be expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has essentially the same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for acceptance, and that it will meet the crashworthiness requirements of the FHWA and the NCHRP Report 350.
	To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of acceptance is designated as number CC-12Q and shall not be reproduced except in full. This letter and the test documentation upon which it is based are public information. All such letters and documentation may be reviewed at our office upon request.
	The ET-Plus and ET-Plus 31 end terminals are patented products and considered proprietary. If proprietary devices are specified by a highway agency for use on Federal-aid projects, except exempt, non-NHS projects, (a) they must be supplied through competitive bidding with equally suitable unpatented items; (b) the highway agency must certify that they are essential for synchronization with the existing highway facilities or that no equally suitable alternative exists; or (c) they must be used for research or for a distinctive type of construction on relatively short sections of road for experimental purposes. Our regulations concerning proprietary products are contained in Title 23, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 635.411.
	This acceptance letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to use, manufacture, or sell any patented device for which the applicant is not the patent holder. The acceptance letter is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the candidate device, and the FHWA is neither prepared nor required to become involved in issues concerning patent law. Patent issues, if any, are to be resolved by the applicant.Sincerely yours,

			Signature of David A. Nicol

			David A. Nicol, P.E.
			Director, Office of Safety Design
			Office of SafetyEnclosures U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Highway Administration**

1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE

WASHINGTON, DC 20590

202-366-4000Subscribe to email updates
                    About
  

        
              About FHWA
                Careers
                Org Chart
                Staff Directories
                Work with UsPrograms
  

        
              Acquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                SafetyPolicies, Rights, Legal
  

        
              About DOT
                Accessibility
                Budget and Performance
                Civil Rights
                FOIA
                Information Quality
                No FEAR Act
                Office of Inspector General
                Privacy Policy
                USA.gov
                Web Policies and Notices
                Web StandardsNews & Events
  

        
              Newsroom
                Press Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Media Contacts
                Connect with Us