USA Banner
  U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Here's how you knowOfficial US Government Icon
              **Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
            Secure Site Icon
              **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
 U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation
 Search DOT
            Search
                    About FHWAFHWA Organization
                Headquarters Offices
                Field Offices
                Strategic Plan
                Business Opportunities
                Staff Directories
                Careers
                Highway History
                Contact UsProgramsAcquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                Safety
                Browse by TopicsResourcesCore Highway Topics
                Federal Aid Essentials
                Automation
                Complete Streets
                Laws and Regulations
                Policy & Guidance Center
                Section 508
                Publications and Statistics
                Professional Development
                National Highway Institute
                Resource Center
                Accessibility Resource Library
                FHWA Research LibraryNewsroomPress Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Photos
                Videos
                Media ContactsMenu FHWA Highway Safety Programs Home
                        Safety
                        Roadway Departure Safety
                        Reduce Crash Severity
                        Hardware Eligibility Letters


            
            In This Section
        Roadway Departure Safety
                Strategic Approach
                                Strategic Plan
                Crash Emphasis Brochures
                Focused Approach
                Noteworthy Practices
                Partner Resources
                Keep Vehicles on the Road
                                Pavement Friction
                Horizontal Curve Safety
                Rumble Strips and Rumble Stripes
                Nighttime Visibility
                Provide for a Safe Recovery
                                SafetyEdge
                Clear Zones
                Reduce Crash Severity
                                Overview
                Hardware Eligibility Letters
                Focus on Reducing Rural Roadway Departures (FoRRRwD)
                                Overview
                All Public Roads
                Proven Countermeasures
                Systemic Approach
                Safety Action Plans
                FoRRRwD Resources
                
                Safety Eligibility Letter B-218
  
  **Hardware Type:**
            Longitudinal Barriers and Bridge Rails
                          **Code:**
            B-218
                          **Date:**
            03/29/2011
                          **Testing Criteria:**
            NCHRP 350
                          **Manufacturer:**
            Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development
                          **Device Description:**
            F-Shape Reinforced Concrete Barrier with Slotted Drain Holes
                          **View PDF:**
            b218.pdf (643.68 KB)
    
    Safety Eligibility Letter B-218


						
**Download Version**PDF [168 KB]

			DOT logoU.S. Department of Transportation**Federal Highway Administration**

			1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E.Washington, D.C. 20590

			March 29, 2011

			In Reply Refer To: HSST/B-218

			

			Mr. Paul Fossier, P.E.

            	Assistant Bridge Design Administrator

                Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development

                Bridge and Structural Design Section, Rm. 608J

                Baton Rouge, LA  70804-9245

            Dear Mr. Fossier:

            This letter is in response to your request for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) acceptance of a roadside safety system for use on the National Highway System (NHS).

            Name of  system:

                	F-Shape Reinforced Concrete Barrier with Slotted Drain HolesType of system:

                	Permanent F-Shape Reinforced Concrete BarrierTest Level:

                	National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 Test Level 4 (TL-4)Testing conducted by:

                	Texas Transportation Institute (TTI)Date of request:

                	December 9, 2010Task Force 13 Designator:

                	SBC04d

            You requested that we find this system acceptable for use on the NHS under the provisions of the NCHRP Report 350 “Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features.”

            **Requirements**Roadside safety systems should meet the guidelines contained in the NCHRP Report 350.  FHWA memorandum “*ACTION:*  Identifying Acceptable Highway Safety Features” of July 25, 1997, provides further guidance on crash testing requirements of longitudinal barriers.

**Decision**The following device was found acceptable, with details provided below:
F-Shape Reinforced Concrete Barrier with Slotted Drain Holes**Description**The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (La DOTD) currently uses a cast-in-place concrete bridge rail on Louisiana bridges.  The F-Shape bridge rail is 32 inches in height and 13.25 inches wide at the base.  Presently, for bridges that use this concrete F-Shape bridge rail, drainage is provided only at the ends of the bridge since there is no opening provided through the bridge rail.  La DOTD has proposed the use of 6 inches high x 24 inches long open slots located 10 feet apart at the base of the rail to accommodate drainage through the railing.  Details of the proposed bridge rail are provided as enclosure to this correspondence.

				**Crash Testing**The proposed La DOTD F-Shape Reinforced Concrete Barrier with Slotted Drain Holes (barrier) was analyzed at the test facilities at the TTI Proving Grounds Riverside Campus.  The analysis was to evaluate the geometry and placement of the drainage slots on the barrier with respect to vehicle impact performance requirements for the NCHRP Report 350, TL-4 specifications.
				
                The proposed drainage slot details were compared with other barriers systems utilizing similar type slots.  This review consisted of comparisons with the Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) Single Slope Concrete Barrier (Wildlife Crossing) Precast SSCB (TXDOT Wildlife Crossing Barrier) and the Washington Pin & Loop Barrier System designed and successfully crash tested by TTI for the Washington State Department of Transportation (acceptance letter HSSD/B-206).  The TTI researchers performed a similar review of the TXDOT Wildlife Crossing Barrier for TXDOT with respect to the size and potential interaction of these openings with respect to the small car and pickup truck for the NCHRP Report 350 crashworthiness criteria.
				
                The potential for vehicular interaction with the barrier was evaluated with respect to the criteria in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (AASHTO).  Two figures are presented in the AASHTO that provide general guidelines for the crash performance of barrier that contain openings or penetrations.  These figures provide guidelines for the preferred post set-back from the face of the railing elements and the preferred ratio of the rail contact widths to the overall height of the bridge rail system (see AASHTO Figures A13.1.1-2-Potential for Wheel, Bumper, or Hood Impact with a Post; and, A13.1.1-3-Post Setback Criteria).  The potential for wheel interaction with the opening in the barrier was investigated.  For the proposed barrier design, the post setback from the face of the rail elements was considered to be zero (0) inches.  The maximum vertical clear opening distance between the bridge top of the bridge deck and the top of the opening is 7-5/8 inches.  Based on this information and the information provided in AASHTO Figure A13.1.1-2, the clear opening height of 7-5/8 inches presents a low potential for vehicular interaction with the opening in the barrier during a vehicular crash.
				
                The ratio in height of the contact length of the F-Shape Barrier to 32 inches total height of rail (i.e., rail contact width to height) is 0.762.  Based on the proposed barrier geometry and the information provided in AASHTO Figure A13.1.1-3, the proposed barrier is considered marginal.
                    
              	**Findings**The analysis of the drainage slot used in the Washington State Department of Transportation Pin & Loop Barrier (WSDOT barrier) appeared to perform well in LS-DYNA impact simulations with both the small car and pickup truck.  Although the WSDOT barrier did not meet the AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware test specifications, the 9-inch high drainage slot specified used in the WSDOT barrier system did not adversely affect the performance of the crash vehicle.  In addition, the potential for vehicle interaction with the drainage slot opening was considered low to marginal with respect to the criteria as provided in AASHTO Section 13 specifications.  Based upon the researchers’ analysis, the F-Shape barrier with drainage slots is considered acceptable with respect to Report 350 TL-4 performance criteria.

				Details including a side-by-side comparison between size openings of TXDOT Wildlife Crossing Barrier, WSDOT barrier, and LaDOTD F-Shape Barrier with drainage slots are provided as enclosure to this correspondence.

				Therefore, the system as described in the request above and detailed in the enclosed drawings is acceptable for use on the NHS under the range of conditions tested, when such use is acceptable to a highway agency.

                Please note the following standard provisions that apply to FHWA letters of acceptance:

                This acceptance is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the system and does not cover their structural features, nor conformity with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
					Any changes that may adversely influence the crashworthiness of the system will require a new acceptance letter.
					Should FHWA discover that the qualification testing was flawed, that in-service performance reveals unacceptable safety problems, or that the system being marketed is significantly different from the version that was crash tested, we reserve the right to modify or revoke our acceptance.
					You will be expected to supply potential users with sufficient information on design and installation requirements to ensure proper performance.
					You will be expected to certify to potential users that the hardware furnished has essentially the same chemistry, mechanical properties, and geometry as that submitted for acceptance, and that it will meet the crashworthiness requirements of the FHWA and the NCHRP Report 350.
					To prevent misunderstanding by others, this letter of acceptance is designated as number B-218 and shall not be reproduced except in full.  This letter and the test documentation upon which it is based are public information.  All such letters and documentation may be reviewed at our office upon request.
					This acceptance letter shall not be construed as authorization or consent by the FHWA to use, manufacture, or sell any patented system for which the applicant is not the patent holder.  The acceptance letter is limited to the crashworthiness characteristics of the candidate system, and the FHWA is neither prepared nor required to become involved in issues concerning patent law.  Patent issues, if any, are to be resolved by the applicant.Sincerely yours,

						*/* Signature of Michael S. Griffith */*

						Michael S. Griffith

							Director, Office of Safety Technologies

							Office of SafetyEnclosures U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Highway Administration**

1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE

WASHINGTON, DC 20590

202-366-4000Subscribe to email updates
                    About
  

        
              About FHWA
                Careers
                Org Chart
                Staff Directories
                Work with UsPrograms
  

        
              Acquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                SafetyPolicies, Rights, Legal
  

        
              About DOT
                Accessibility
                Budget and Performance
                Civil Rights
                FOIA
                Information Quality
                No FEAR Act
                Office of Inspector General
                Privacy Policy
                USA.gov
                Web Policies and Notices
                Web StandardsNews & Events
  

        
              Newsroom
                Press Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Media Contacts
                Connect with Us