alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 190 (Wednesday, October 1, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 51369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25978]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 190 / Wednesday, October 1, 1997 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 51369]]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

12 CFR Part 650

RIN 3052-AB72


Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation; Receivers and 
Conservators; Effective Date

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

ACTION: Notice of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA) published a final rule 
under part 650 on August 15, 1997 (62 FR 43633). The final rule amends 
the regulations that apply to the Federal Agricultural Mortgage 
Corporation by adding a subpart to govern a receivership or 
conservatorship. The final rule implements the receivership/
conservatorship authorities granted to the FCA by the Farm Credit 
System Reform Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-105 (Feb. 10, 1996) and by 
previous law. In accordance with 12 U.S.C. 2252, the effective date of 
the final rule is 30 days from the date of publication in the Federal 
Register during which either or both Houses of Congress are in session. 
Based on the records of the sessions of Congress, the effective date of 
the regulations is October 1, 1997.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The regulation amending 12 CFR part 650 published on 
August 15, 1997 (62 FR 43633) is effective October 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry W. Edwards, Director, Office of 
Secondary Market Oversight, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 
22102-5090, (703) 883-4051, TDD (703) 883-4444.

(12 U.S.C. 2252(a) (9) and (10))

    Dated: September 26, 1997.
Floyd Fithian,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 97-25978 Filed 9-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
#### Willie Clement NORRIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1612.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 18, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Paul Morris, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arthur Joel Berger, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HAYERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The single question presented by this appeal is whether the proof of possession with intent to sell cannabis was sufficient because of the possibility that there was joint possession of the apartment in which the contraband was found. At the time of the execution of the search warrant, two persons were in the apartment, one of whom was the defendant. Later, the appellant admitted to police officers that he was “. . . the occupant and the owner .” of the apartment and delivered the keys to the police. The defendant offered the testimony of the apartment manager that the defendant was not the person who paid the rent, but the manager testified that he had no knowledge of who occupied the apartment.

We conclude that the fact that a person, other than the defendant, was also present at the time of the service of the search warrant and that a person, other than the defendant, regularly paid the rent was not enough to bring this cause within the purview of the rule in *Torres v. State,*253 So.2d 450 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971), because of defendant’s admission that he was the owner and occupant and the absence of any testimony that the apartment was jointly occupied with another person.

The State has noted and called to the attention of this court that the sentence imposed is in violation of *Martin v. State,*251 So.2d 283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971); and *Dorfman v. State,*351 So.2d 954 (Fla. *7301977), filed July 28, 1977.1 Therefore, we affirm the judgment but reverse the sentence and remand the cause for the entry of a sentence in accordance with the cited authorities.

Judgment affirmed; sentence reversed.

1

. Petition for Rehearing pending.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          23,637
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,637
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,701
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,170
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,637
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,669)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,669)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,669)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.003)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 25, 2010

p0517 

# Order

May 25, 2010

140301 & (37)

BRONSON METHODIST HOSPITAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140301 COA: 286087 Kalamazoo CC: 08-000066-NF ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e motion to hold th e application for leave to appeal in abeyance for University of Michigan Regents, et al v Titan Insurance Company , (Docket No. 136905) is consid ered, and it is GRANTED. We ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending th e decision in that case.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**Chief FinancialOfficer Certification**

 

I, Richard J. Kaplan,certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-Qof DeCrane Holdings Co.;

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 
| Date: October 9,  2003 |                                              |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                              |
|                   |                                              |
|                   | /s/  Richard  J. Kaplan                      |   |
|                   | Richard J.  Kaplan                                |
|                   | Chief Financial  Officer and  Assistant Secretary |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.1
    
                       ACCOUNTANT'S CONSENT
    
    
    
    
    The Board of Directors
    SITEL Corporation:
    
    
    We consent to the use of our reports incorporated by reference in the 
    registration statement (No. 333-13403) filed on Form S-3, registration
    statement (No.  033-99434) filed on Form S-8 and registration statement  
    (No. 333-19069) filed on Form S-8 of SITEL Corporation of our report dated 
    April 4, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of SITEL 
    Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1996, and the 
    related consolidated statements of income (loss), stockholders' equity 
    and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended 
    December 31, 1996 and the related schedule, which reports appear in the 
    December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of SITEL Corporation.
    
    
    
    
                                               KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
    
    
    
    Omaha, Nebraska
    April 10, 1997
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 18

- 00167

- CV

Young J u Pak

v.

Young Eun Yang §

§

§

§ From the 231st District Court

of Tarrant County (231

- 601904

- 16)

July 12, 2018

Per Curiam



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
Open Literature Review Summary

Chemical Name: Atrazine

CAS No: 1912-24-9

ECOTOX Record Number and Citation:

DeNoyelles, F. Jr., and W.D. Kettle. 1983. Site studies to determine the extent and

potential impact of herbicide contamination in Kansas waters. Contribution Number 239,

Kansas Water Resources Research Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.

tw1'\ Q.i '0 t; 7-5i.( }).boh )

Kettle, W.D. 1982. Description and analysis oftoxicant-induced responses of aquatic

communities in replicated experimental ponds. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Kansas,

Lawrence, KS.

These two publications contain information that is also published in other articles

reviewed for this exercise including DeNoyelles and Kettle (1980), deNoyelles et al.

(1982), deNoyelles et al. (1989), and deNoyelles et al. (1994). These articles (deNoyelles

and Kettle, 1983 and Kettle, 1982) were reviewed to ensure that no endpoints from these

studies were not also included in the aforementioned articles. It was determined that

these articles did not produce any endpoints not already reported in the aforementioned

articles. Therefore DERs were not completed.

11.1.1.111

2087829
#### Raymond SMITH and Melvin Graham McClain, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-44.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 29, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 98-1204.2 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY 

Accession of Poland 

 Protocol Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and OTHER GOVERNMENTS 

Signed at Brussels December 16, 1997 

 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 

 MULTILATERAL 

 North Atlantic Treaty: Accession of Poland 

Protocol signed at Brussels December 16, 1997; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate February 11, 1998 (Treaty Doc. 105-36, 

 105th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 March 3, 1998 (Senate Executive Report No. 105-14, 

 105th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 April 30, 1998; 

Ratified by the President May 21, 1998; 

Ratification of the United States of America deposited August 20, 1998; 

Entered into force December 4, 1998.
#### Raymond Charles QUALMANN, Appellant, v. Nara Roosa QUALMANN, Appellee.

No. 71-24.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 31, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Otis Farrington, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Holdings, Inc.   By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Executive Officer,
and DirectorDate:June 23, 2008By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Financial OfficerDate:June 23, 2008
```

[105th Congress Private Law 3]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:pvtl3.105]

Private Law 105-3
105th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  For the relief of Roy Desmond Moser. <<NOTE:  Nov. 21, 1997 -  [H.R. 
                                2731]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF EFFECTIVE DATE OF NATURALIZATION OF ROY 
            DESMOND MOSER.

    Notwithstanding title III of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 
any predecessor provisions to such title, or any other provision of law 
relating to naturalization, for purposes of determining the eligibility 
of Roy Desmond Moser for relief under the Agreement Between the 
Government of the United States and the Government of the Federal 
Republic of Germany Concerning Final Benefits to Certain United States 
Nationals Who Were Victims of National Socialist Measures of 
Persecution, signed at Bonn on September 19, 1995, Roy Desmond Moser is 
deemed to be a naturalized citizen of the United States as of August 8, 
1942.

    Approved November 21, 1997.
```
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of United Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brenda M.
Hudson-Nelson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. '1350, as
adopted pursuant to '906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
Brenda M. Hudson-Nelson





Brenda M.
Hudson-Nelson


Chief
Financial Officer


April 15,
2008
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the T REIT, Inc. (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anthony W. Thompson,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the restated financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: December 10,
2002


By:

/s/    ANTHONY W. THOMPSONAnthony W. Thompson Chief Executive Officer
#### TYLANDER, deCLAIRE, BECKER & VAN KLEECK, Chartered, a Florida professional corporation, Appellant, v. Donald WASSIE, Frank E. Kaehn & Associated Designers, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-804.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 22, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Samuel AVERHEART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. GG-202.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 16, 1978.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and Margaret Good, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals a jury conviction of burglary of a dwelling. He urges that the sentence imposed thereon of life imprisonment is excessive.

Count II of the information alleged in pertinent part that:

> “Samuel Averheart, ... did unlawfully enter remain (sic) in a certain dwelling, located at 20 North Reus Street . the property of Pearl Bartlett as owner or custodian thereof, with the intent to commit an offense therein, to wit: Sexual Battery, contrary to Section 810.02(3), Florida Statutes.”

Count I of the information alleged that appellant on the same date committed sexual battery upon Pearl Bartlett and that in the course thereof, he used or threatened to *610use a deadly weapon or he used actual physical force likely to cause serious personal injury, contrary to Section 794.011(3), Florida Statutes (1975). Appellant does not challenge the judgment and sentence imposed on this count.

Section 810.02, Florida Statutes (1975), provides in part:

> “(1) ‘Burglary’ means entering or remaining in a structure or a conveyance with the intent to commit an offense therein, .

> (2) Burglary is a felony of the first degree, punishable by imprisonment for a term of years not exceeding life imprisonment or as provided in § 775.082, § 775.-083, or § 775.084, if, in the course of committing the offense, the offender:

> (a) Makes an assault upon any person.

> (b) Is armed, or arms himself within such structure, with explosives or a dangerous weapon.

> (3) If the offender does not make an assault or is not armed, or does not arm himself, with a dangerous weapon or explosive as aforesaid during the course of committing the offense and the structure entered is a dwelling or there is a human being in the structure or conveyance at the time the offender entered or remained in the structure or conveyance, the burglary is a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in § 775.-082, § 775.083, or § 775.084. Otherwise, burglary is a felony of the third degree punishable as provided in § 775.082, § 775.083, or § 775.084.”

Count II of the information herein charged appellant with burglary of a dwelling under Section 810.02(3), a second degree felony. It contained no allegations of the aggravating circumstances set forth in Sections 810.02(2)(a) or 810.02(2)(b). The allegation that an assault occurred in the course of the commission of the burglary may not be inferred from other counts of the information. Under Section 810.02(3) which is applicable herein, appellant could be sentenced to no more than fifteen years imprisonment. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed. The sentence imposed for Count II, burglary of a dwelling is set aside and the cause is remanded to the trial court for sentencing as provided by Section 810.02(3).

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25616]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3580-000]


First Power, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

September 23, 1997.
    First Power, LLC (First Power) submitted for filing a rate schedule 
under which First Power will engage in wholesale electric power and 
energy transactions as a marketer. First Power also requested waiver of 
various Commission regulations. In particular, First Power requested 
that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by First 
Power.
    On September 8, 1997, pursuant to delegated authority, the 
Director, Division of Rate Applications, Office of Electric Power 
Regulation, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, 
subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by First Power should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, First Power is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of First Power's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is October 8, 1997. Copies 
of the full text of the order are available from the Commission's 
Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25616 Filed 9-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M