alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSolar Corona Explorer:  A mission for the physical diagnosis of the solar coronaMission objectives and spacecraft requirements for the Solar Corona Explorer (SCE), a proposed free flying, unmanned solar research craft to be tenatively launched in 1987, were defined. The SCE's purpose is to investigate structure, dynamics and evolution of the corona, globally and in the required physical detail, to study the close coupling between the inner corona and the heliosphere. Investigative objectives are: (1) to understand the corona as the source of varying interplanetary plasma and of varying solar X-ray and extreme ultraviolet fluxes; (2) to develop the capabilities to model the corona with sufficient precision to forecast the Earth's variable environment in space, on the scales from weeks to years; (3) to develop an understanding of the physical processes that determine the dynamics and physical state of the coronal plasma, particularly acceleration processes; and (4) to develop insight and test theory on the Sun applicable to stellar coronae and winds, and in particular, to understand why cool stars put such a large fraction of their energy into X-rays. Considered related factors are: (1) duration of the mission; (2) onboard measuring instrumentation; (3) ground support equipment and procedures; and (4) programs of interpretation and modeling.Document ID19850011602Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1981Subject CategorySolar PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:87416NASA-TM-87416Accession Number85N19912Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850011602.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1522

WAYNE A. JONES, Ed.D.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY; MAKOLA M. ABDULLAH, Ph.D.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cv-00467-JAG)

Submitted: January 12, 2021 Decided: February 4, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard F. Hawkins, III, THE HAWKINS LAW FIRM, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellant. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General, Samuel T. Towell, Deputy Attorney 

General, E. Lewis Kincer, Jr. Senior Assistant Attorney General, Ramona L. Taylor, 

Associate College Counsel/Assistant Attorney General, William Ryan Waddell, Assistant 

Attorney General, Toby J. Heytens, Solicitor General, Michelle S. Kallen, Deputy Solicitor 

General, Martine E. Cicconi, Deputy Solicitor General, Jessica Merry Samuels, Assistant 

Solicitor General, Zachary R. Glubiak, John Marshall Fellow, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Wayne A. Jones, Ed.D., a former assistant professor at Virginia State University 

(“the University”), appeals the district court’s order granting the University’s and its 

President’s motion to dismiss Jones’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. See Jones v. Va. State Univ., No. 3:19-cv-00467-JAG (E.D. Va. Apr. 6, 

2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25505]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 091697E]

Marine Mammals; Permit No. 970 (P557E)

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Scientific research permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a request for amendment of 
scientific research permit no. 970 submitted by Scripps Institution of 
Oceanography, Acoustic Thermometry of Ocean Climate Project, Institute 
for Geophysics and Planetary Physics, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, 
California 92093-02252, has been granted.

ADDRESSES: The amendment and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289); and
    Regional Administrator, Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean 
Boulevard, Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802-4213 (310/980-4001); and
    Protected Species Program Manager, Pacific Area Office, NMFS, 2570 
Dole Street, Room 106, Honolulu, HI 96822-2396 (808/973-2987).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 16, 1997, notice was published in 
the Federal Register (62 FR 38070) that an amendment of permit no. 970, 
had been requested. The requested amendment has been granted under the 
authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the provisions of Sec. 216.39 of the Regulations 
Governing the Taking and Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR part 216), 
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
seq.),and the provisions of Sec. 222.25 of the regulations governing 
the taking, importing, and exporting of endangered fish and wildlife 
(50 CFR 222.23). The amendment extends the expiration date of Permit 
No. 970 through December 31, 1999.
    Issuance of this amendment, as required by the ESA was based on a 
finding that such permit: (1) Was applied for in good faith; (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species which is the 
subject of this permit; and (3) is consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in section 2 of the ESA.

    Dated: September 17, 1997.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-25505 Filed 9-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
```
Exhibit  32.2

                                                         

 

                                 ALPHATRADE.COM

                              A Nevada corporation

 

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the

"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the

Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Katharine

Johnston, Principal Accounting Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, 

as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the 

best of my knowledge and belief:

 

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or

         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of

         the Company.

 

 

 

 

         Dated: April 21, 2010                 /s/ Katharine Johnston

                                               ---------------------------------

                                               Its: Principal Accounting Officer

 

 

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or

         other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the

         signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of

         this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be

         retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange

         Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are

         accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of

         the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section

         1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being

         filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                Exhibit 32.2
## **EXHIBIT 32**

## ** **

### **INSWEB CORPORATION**

### ** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofInsWeb Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned, hereby certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to InsWeb Corporation, and willbe retained by InsWeb Corporation and furnished to the Securities ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| **/s/ HUSSEIN A. ENAN**              | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------|------------|
| Hussein A. Enan                      |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| Dated: May 15, 2006             |
|                                 |
|                                 |
| **/s/ WILLIAM D.GRIFFIN**            | ** ** |
| William D. Griffin                   |
| Chief Financial Officer              |
| Dated : May 15, 2006            |

 

1

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DARYL KEITH MARSHALL,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-50426

D.C. No. 3:07-cr-01821-BEN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 22, 2015** 

Before: GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Daryl Keith Marshall appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

APR 24 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Marshall contends that the district court erred by failing to provide him with

an opportunity to be heard regarding whether his violation warranted revocation of

his supervised release. Contrary to Marshall’s contention, the denial of the right of

allocution is not a “structural error” warranting automatic reversal. See Boardman

v. Estelle, 957 F.2d 1523, 1530 (9th Cir. 1992). Rather, we review for plain error,

see United States v. Waknine, 543 F.3d 546, 551 (9th Cir. 2008), and find none. 

The record reflects that, in light of his multiple prior violations, the district court

rejected Marshall’s request to be placed back on supervised release. Accordingly,

Marshall has not shown a reasonable probability that, but for the alleged error, the

district court would have determined that revocation was unwarranted. See United

States v. Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. 74, 81-82 (2004).

AFFIRMED.

2 14-50426
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 2

- NM

- 21 7

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Case 05-90083-WWB Doc 14 Filed 01/05/06 Entered 01/05/06 16:38:55 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 3
Case 05-90083-WWB Doc 14 Filed 01/05/06 Entered 01/05/06 16:38:55 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 3
Case 05-90083-WWB Doc 14 Filed 01/05/06 Entered 01/05/06 16:38:55 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 3
#### Celso R. FERNANDEZ and Marie Fernandez, his wife, Appellants, v. Lowell Dorman SKEENES, Fuchs Baking Co., and Allstate Ins. Company, a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-1078.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 18, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, in connection  with the filing of the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the Year Ended  December  31,  2005 (the  "Report")  by Tarrant
Apparel Group ("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   to  the  best  of  my  knowledge,   the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
     requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934; and

2.   to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
     presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
     operations of Registrant.



Date:    March 31, 2006                  By:   /s/    Barry Aved
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                      Barry Aved,
                                                Chief Executive Officer
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 97-910 

________________________________________________________________________ 

EXTRADITION 

 Treaty Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and SWITZERLAND 

Signed at Washington November 14, 1990 

 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 SWITZERLAND 

 Extradition 

Treaty signed at Washington November 14, 1990; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate June 12, 1995 (Treaty Doc. 104-9, 

 104th Congress, 1st Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 July 24, 1996 (Senate Executive Report No. 104-32, 

 104th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 August 2, 1996; 

Ratified by the President November 4, 1996; 

Exchange of instruments of ratification at Washington 

 March 14, 1997; 

Entered into force September 10, 1997.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

[BANK OF AMERICA LOGO]
================================================================================
                                                          AMENDMENT TO DOCUMENTS

                   AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT

     This Amendment No. 1 (the "Amendment") dated as of JANUARY 30, 2002, is
between Bank of America, N.A. (the "Bank") and Edelbrock Corporation (the
"Borrower").

                                    RECITALS

     A.   The Bank and the Borrower entered into a certain Business Loan
Agreement dated as of January 26, 2000 (the "Agreement").

     B.   The Bank and the Borrower desire to amend the Agreement.

                                   AGREEMENT

     1.   Definitions. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment
shall have the meaning given to them in the Agreement.

     2.   Amendments. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows

          2.1  In Paragraph 1.2 of the Agreement, the date "February 1, 2003"
               is substituted for the date "February 1, 2002".

     3.   Representations and Warranties. When the Borrower signs this
Amendment, the Borrower represents and warrants to the Bank that: (a) there is
no event which is, or with notice or lapse of time or both would be, a default
under the Agreement except those events, if any, that have been disclosed in
writing to the Bank or waived in writing by the Bank, (b) the representations
and warranties in the Agreement are true as of the date of this Amendment as if
made on the date of this Amendment, (c) this Amendment is within the Borrower's
powers, has been duly authorized, and does not conflict with any of the
Borrower's organizational papers, and (d) this Amendment does not conflict with
any law, agreement, or obligation by which the Borrower is bound.

     4.   Conditions. This Amendment will be effective when the Bank receives
the following items, in form and content acceptable to the Bank:

          4.1  Certificate of good standing for the Borrower from its state
               of formation.

     5.   Effect of Amendment. Except as provided in this Amendment, all of the
terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

     This Amendment is executed as of the date stated at the beginning of this
Amendment.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.                        Edelbrock Corporation

X  /s/ ROBERT J. LOVIE                       X /s/ JEFFREY L. THOMPSON
  ---------------------------------            ---------------------------------
By: Robert J. Lovie, Vice President          By Jeffrey L. Thompson, Executive
                                                Vice President


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    -1-
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of EnergyConnect Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the twelve months ended January 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:
 
 The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of this 3rd day of May 2010.
 
 
 /s/ Kevin R. Evans
 Kevin R. Evans
 Chief Executive Officer
**TS -**  **B196Y2 -**  **Chemical Structure and Name**



### Sanitized
RUSSIA 

 

 

 

 Brief Policy 

January 2013 

THE U.S. 

COMMISSION ON 

INTERNATIONAL 

RELIGIOUS 

FREEDOM 

was created by the 

International 

Religious Freedom Act 

of 1998 to monitor the 

status of freedom of 

thought, conscience, 

and religion or belief 

abroad, as defined in 

the Universal 

Declaration of Human 

Rights and related 

international 

instruments, and to 

give independent policy 

recommendations to 

the President, 

Secretary of State, 

and Congress. 

732 N. Capitol St. N.W. , 

Suite A714 

Washington, D.C. 20401 

Phone: (202) 786-0613 

Communications@uscirf.gov 

www.uscirf.gov 

January 2013 

RUSSIA: 

UNRULY STATE OF 

LAW

Findings from a Visit of the 

U.S. Commission on 

International Religious Freedom 

(USCIRF)
# ; Contacts. Withwhomoutside the FAAhasthis proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response Bombardier Glenn Baxter, Paul- 

### 5121/09 No objection Aerospace Andre Brossard·

Jaimes, Jr. Transport Canada Anthony Wan 5/26/09 No objection National Business Elias Cotti, Manager 5121/09 No objection Aireaft Assoc Technical Services (NBAA)

- .--



### "
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Jilin Chemical Industrial Company
Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Shi
Jianxun, General Manager of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.


                                             By: \s\ Shi Jianxun
                                                 -------------------------------
                                             Name: Shi Jianxun
                                             Title: General Manager

Dated: June 20, 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-95536) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, 1995 Stock
Plan, 1995 Stock Purchase Plan and 1995 Director Option Plan of Netscape
Communications Corporation, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-99198) pertaining to the 1993 Incentive Stock Plan of Collabra Software,
Inc., in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-4222) pertaining to the
1993 Stock Option Plan of InSoft, Inc., and in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-4478) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Plan of Netcode Corporation, of
our report dated January 26, 1996, except for Note 2, as to which the date is
May 28, 1996, with respect to the supplemental consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Netscape Communications Corporation included in this Amendment
No. 3 to the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 1995.
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Palo Alto, California
November 22, 1996