Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2013 / Notices 72879 

In addition, the Filing Titles for the 

Part 284 program have been modified to 

be more descriptive. 

For more information, contact Aaron 

Kahn, Office of Energy Market 

Regulation at (202) 502–8339 or send an 

email to FERConline@ferc.gov. 

Dated: November 26, 2013. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2013–28921 Filed 12–3–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Project No. 14540–000; Project No. 14539– 

000] 

Western Minnesota Municipal Power 

Agency; Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund III, 

LLC; Notice Announcing Filing Priority 

for Preliminary Permit Applications 

On November 25, 2013, the 

Commission held a drawing to 

determine priority between competing 

preliminary permit applications with 

identical filing times. In the event that 

the Commission concludes that neither 

of the applicants’ plans is better adapted 

than the other to develop, conserve, and 

utilize in the public interest the water 

resources of the region at issue, the 

priority established by this drawing will 

serve as the tiebreaker. Based on the 

drawing, the order of priority is as 

follows: 

1. Western Minnesota Municipal Power 

Agency Project No. 14540–000 

2. Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund III, LLC

Project No. 14539–000 

Dated: November 26, 2013. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2013–28926 Filed 12–3–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–1017; FRL–9902–63] 

Product Cancellation Order for Certain 

Pesticide Registrations; Correction 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice; correction. 

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the 

Federal Register of September 20, 2013, 

concerning the product cancellation of 

several pesticide products, which were 

previously published in the Federal 

Register of September 18, 2013 and are 

subject to the provisions set forth in that 

notice. This document corrects the 

inclusion of these referenced 

registrations for product cancellation in 

the September 20, 2013 cancellation 

order notice. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

W. Pates, Jr., Pesticide Re-Evaluation 

Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

number: (703) 308–8195; email address: 

pates.john@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

The Agency included in the 

September 20, 2013 cancellation order 

notice a list of those who may be 

potentially affected by this action. 

B. How can I get copies of this document 

and other related information? 

The docket for this action, identified 

by docket identification (ID) number 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–1017, is available 

at http://www.regulations.gov or at the 

Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory 

Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the 

Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West 

Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The 

Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 

a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 

telephone number for the Public 

Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and 

the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

II. What does this correction do? 

EPA issued a notice in the Federal 

Register of September 20, 2013 (78 FR 

57850) (FRL–9396–3), concerning the 

product cancellation of several pesticide 

products, including the following 

McLaughlin Gormley King Co.’s product 

registrations: D-trans Allethrin 90% 

Concentrate (EPA Reg. No. 001021– 

01060), D-trans Intermediate 1868 (EPA 

Reg. No. 001021–01128), Evercide 

Intermediate 2416 (EPA Reg. No. 

001021–01550), Evercide Intermediate 

2491 (EPA Reg. No. 001021–01575), 

Evercide Residual Pressurized Spray 

2523 (EPA Reg. No. 001021–01594), and 

Evercide Residual Pressurized Spray 

2581 (EPA Reg. No. 001021–01607). 

This document corrects the inclusion of 

these referenced registrations for 

product cancellation in the September 

20, 2013 cancellation order notice. 

These products were previously 

published in the Federal Register of 

September 18, 2013, under FR Doc. 

2013–22718 (78 FR 57388) (FRL–9395– 

2) and are subject to the provisions set 

forth in that notice. 

FR Doc. 2013–22847 published in the 

Federal Register of September 20, 2013 

(78 FR 57850) (FRL–9396–3) is 

corrected as follows: 

1. On page 57850, Table 1, first 

column (EPA Registration No.), remove 

the entries: 001021–01060, 001021– 

01128, 001021–01550, 001021–01575, 

001021–01594, and 001021–01607. 

2. On page 57851, Table 2, first 

column (EPA Company No.), remove the 

entry: 1021. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, Pesticides 

and pests. 

Dated: November 22, 2013. 

Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., 

Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2013–28987 Filed 12–3–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9903–79–Region 3] 

Adequacy Status of the Submitted 

Redesignation Requests and 

Maintenance Plans for the Charleston, 

West Virginia 1997 and 2006 Fine 

Particulate Matter National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards Nonattainment Area 

for Transportation Conformity 

Purposes 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of adequacy. 

SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is 

notifying the public that EPA has made 

insignificance findings through the 

transportation conformity adequacy 

process, under the Clean Air Act (CAA), 

for directly emitted fine particulate 

matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides 

(NOX) in the Charleston, West Virginia 

1997 and 2006 PM2.5 national ambient 

air quality standards (NAAQS) 

nonattainment area. West Virginia 

submitted the insignificance findings 

with the redesignation requests and 

maintenance plans submittal on 

December 6, 2012. As a result of EPA’s 

findings, the Charleston, West Virginia 

nonattainment area is no longer 

required to perform a regional emissions 

analysis for directly emitted PM2.5, or 


EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
72880 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2013 / Notices 

NOX, as part of future PM2.5 conformity 

determinations for the 1997 and 2006 

PM2.5 NAAQS. 

DATES: Effective on December 19, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gregory Becoat, Environmental 

Scientist, Office of Air Program 

Planning (3AP30), United States 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, PA 19103, (215) 814– 

2036; becoat.gregory@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Today’s 

notice is simply an announcement of a 

finding that EPA has already made. EPA 

Region III sent a letter to the West 

Virginia Department of Environmental 

Protection on October 29, 2013 stating 

that EPA has made insignificance 

findings, through the adequacy process, 

for PM2.5 and NOX for the Charleston, 

WV 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS 

nonattainment area, as the State had 

requested in its redesignation requests 

and maintenance plans submittal. 

Receipt of the submittal was announced 

on EPA’s transportation conformity Web 

site. No comments were received. The 

findings letter is available at EPA’s 

conformity Web site: http://

www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/

transconf/adequacy.htm. 

Transportation conformity is required 

by section 176(c) of the CAA. EPA’s 

conformity rule requires that 

transportation plans, transportation 

improvement programs, and projects 

conform to state air quality 

implementation plans (SIPs) and 

establishes the criteria and procedures 

for determining whether or not they do. 

Conformity to a SIP means that 

transportation activities will not 

produce new air quality violations, 

worsen existing violations, or delay 

timely attainment of the national 

ambient air quality standards. 

The criteria by which EPA determine 

whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emission 

budgets are adequate for conformity 

purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 

93.118(e)(4). EPA described the process 

for determining the adequacy of 

submitted SIP budgets in a July 1, 2004 

preamble starting at 69 FR 40038 and 

used the information in these resources 

in making this adequacy determination. 

Please note that an adequacy review is 

separate from EPA’s completeness 

review, and should not be used to 

prejudge EPA’s ultimate approval action 

for the SIP. Even if EPA finds a budget 

adequate, the SIP could later be 

disapproved. 

The finding and the response to 

comments are available at EPA’s 

conformity Web site: http://

www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/

transconf/adequacy.htm. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q. 

Dated: November 14, 2013. 

W.C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2013–28967 Filed 12–3–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9903–81–Region–3] 

Adequacy Status of the West Virginia 

Portion of the Steubenville-Weirton, 

WV-OH Nonattainment Area Submitted 

for the 1997 Fine Particulate Matter 

Standard Redesignation Request and 

Maintenance Plan for Transportation 

Conformity Purposes 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of adequacy. 

SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is 

notifying the public that we have made 

insignificance findings through the 

transportation conformity adequacy 

process, under the Clean Air Act (CAA), 

for directly emitted fine particulate 

matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen oxides 

(NOX) in the West Virginia portion of 

the Steubenville-Weirton, WV-OH 1997 

PM2.5 national ambient air quality 

standard (NAAQS) nonattainment area. 

West Virginia submitted the 

insignificance findings with the 

redesignation request and maintenance 

plan submittal on April 13, 2012. As a 

result of EPA’s findings, the West 

Virginia portion of the SteubenvilleWeirton, WV-OH nonattainment area is 

no longer required to perform a regional 

emissions analysis for directly emitted 

PM2.5, or NOx, as part of future PM2.5

conformity determinations for the 1997 

annual PM2.5 air quality standard. 

DATES: Effective on December 19, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gregory Becoat, Environmental 

Scientist, Office of Air Quality Planning, 

United States Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, PA 19103, (215) 814– 

2036; becoat.gregory@epa.gov 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Today’s 

notice is simply an announcement of a 

finding that EPA has already made. EPA 

Region III sent a letter to the West 

Virginia Department of Environmental 

Protection on September 25, 2013 

stating that EPA has made 

insignificance findings, through the 

adequacy process, for PM2.5 and NOX for 

the West Virginia Portion of the 

Steubenville-Weirton, WV-OH 1997 

PM2.5 NAAQS nonattainment area, as 

the State had requested in its 

redesignation and maintenance plan 

submittal. Receipt of the submittal was 

announced on EPA’s transportation 

conformity Web site. No comments were 

received. The findings letter is available 

at EPA’s conformity Web site: http://

www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/

transconf/adequacy.htm. 

Transportation conformity is required 

by section 176(c) of the CAA. EPA’s 

conformity rule requires that 

transportation plans, transportation 

improvement programs, and projects 

conform to state air quality 

implementation plans (SIPs) and 

establishes the criteria and procedures 

for determining whether or not they do. 

Conformity to a SIP means that 

transportation activities will not 

produce new air quality violations, 

worsen existing violations, or delay 

timely attainment of the national 

ambient air quality standards. 

The criteria by which we determine 

whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emission 

budgets are adequate for conformity 

purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 

93.118(e)(4). EPA described the process 

for determining the adequacy of 

submitted SIP budgets in a July 1, 2004 

preamble starting at 69 FR 40038 and 

used the information in these resources 

in making this adequacy determination. 

Please note that an adequacy review is 

separate from EPA’s completeness 

review, and should not be used to 

prejudge EPA’s ultimate approval action 

for the SIP. Even if EPA finds a budget 

adequate, the SIP could later be 

disapproved. 

The finding and the response to 

comments are available at EPA’s 

conformity Web site: http://

www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/

transconf/adequacy.htm. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q. 

Dated: November 15, 2013. 

W.C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2013–28981 Filed 12–3–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES