alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
24.1  Power of Attorney   Each
person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Robert L.
Norton and Carrie A. Wolfe, and each of them, as his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of and substitution and
resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any
and all capacities, to sign FTD, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 and any and all amendments thereto, and to
file the same, with all exhibits and schedules thereto, and other documents
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and hereby grants unto
such attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform
each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his or her
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.  This
Power of Attorney may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed an original and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute
one and the same document.  IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands as of the fifth
day of September, 2003.  /S/ ROBERT L. NORTONRobert L. Norton/S/ CARRIE A. WOLFECarrie A. Wolfe/S/ MICHAEL J. SOENENMichael J. Soenen/S/ CHRISTOPHER J.D. AINSLEYChristopher J.D. Ainsley/S/ HABIB Y. GORGIHabib Y. Gorgi/S/ STEPHEN G. KASNETStephen G. Kasnet/S/ STEPHEN G. PAGLIUCAStephen G. Pagliuca/S/ RICHARD C. PERRYRichard C. Perry
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 98-310 

________________________________________________________________________ 

NARCOTIC DRUGS 

Suppression 

 Agreement between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and JAMAICA 

Signed at Kingston May 6, 1997 

 

 and 

Protocol Amending the Agreement 

Signed at Kingston February 6, 2004 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 JAMAICA 

 

 Narcotic Drugs: Suppression 

 Agreement signed at Kingston May 6, 1997; 

 Entered into force March 10, 1998. 

 And protocol amending the agreement. 

 Signed at Kingston February 6, 2004; 

 Entered into force February 6, 2004.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joshua M. BURSH, II.

No. 62100.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 24, 1978.

In re: Joshua M. Bursh, II applying for stay order. Lincoln Parish.

Insufficient showing made to warrant the issuance of the stay order requested.
255 La. 818

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Earl SMITH v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50478.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 13, 1970.

In re: Earl Smith applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

SUMMERS, J. and BARHAM, J., are of the opinion an evidentiary hearing should have been granted by the trial court.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

82–250 WASHINGTON : 2013

113th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 113–45 

WOOD RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM RECONSTRUCTION, 

ILLINOIS, POST AUTHORIZATION CHANGE REPORT 

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY, ARMY, 

CIVIL WORKS, THE DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE

TRANSMITTING

THE WOOD RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM RECONSTRUCTION, ILLINOIS, 

POST AUTHORIZATION CHANGE REPORT 

JULY 8, 2013.—Referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure and ordered to be printed 

20:44 Jul 30 2013 Jkt 082250 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HD045PL XXX HD045PL

(iii)
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix

(1)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25549]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4082-000]


The Washington Water Power Company; Notice of Filing

September 22, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 11, 1997, The Washington Water Power 
Company tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced 
docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before October 3, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25549 Filed 9-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# U n i te d S t a te s C o u r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 21-5142 September Term, 2021 1: 21-c v -007 90-UNA Filed O n: Octob er 19 , 20 21 GrantAn derso n,

App ellant v . United Sta tes o f

Am erica, App ellee O N AP P E A LF R O M T H E U N IT E D S T A T E S D IS T R IC T

C O U RT F O R T H E D IS T R IC T

O FC O L U MB IA B E F O R E : Ro g e rs a n d M ille tt , C irc u it J u d g e s , a n d S e n te lle , S e n io r C irc u it J u d g e J U DGM EN T T h isa p p e a l wa s co n s id e re d o n t h er e c o rd fro m t h eU n it e d S ta te s D is tr ict C o u r t fo r th eD is tr ict o f C o lu m b iaa n d o n t h eb r ie f file d b y a p p e lla n t. S e eF e d . R . A p p . P . 3 4 ( a ) ( 2 ) ; D .C . C ir . R u le3 4 (

j) . I t is O R D E R E DAN D AD J U D G E D t h a t th ed is tr ict c o u r t’ s M a y 1 7 , 2 0 2 1 o rd e r

b e a ffir m e d . T h ed is tr ict c o u r t c o n c lu d e d t h a t it

l a c k e d j u r is d icti o n toe n te r ta in a p p e lla n t’ s p e ti ti o n fo r

aw r it of a u d it a q u e re lab e c a u s et h eu n d e r ly in g j u d g m e n t h es o u g h t to c h a lle n g ewa s i s s u e d i n D .C . S u p e r io r C o u r t. O n a p p e a l, a p p e lla n t p re s s e s n oa rg u m e n t c h a lle n g in g t h a t ju r is d icti o n a l r u lin g , a n d h eh a s t h e re fo refo r fe it e d a n y

s u c h c h a lle n g e . S e eU n it e d S ta te s ex

re l. To tt e n v . B o m b a rd ie r C o r p ., 3 8 0 F .3 d 4 8 8 , 4 9 7( D .C . C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . P u rs u a n t toD .C . C irc u it R u le3 6 , th is d is p o s it io n w ill n o t b ep u b lis h e d . T h eC le r k i s d ire cte d tow it h h o ld i s s u a n c eof t h em a n d a teh e re in u n ti l s e v e n d a ys a fte r re s o lu ti o n of a n y t im e ly p e ti ti o n fo r

re h e a r in g o r

p e ti ti o n fo r

re h e a r in g e n b a n c . S e eF e d . R . A p p . P . 4 1 ( b ) ; D .C . C ir . R u le4 1 . P e r C u r ia m F O R

T H E C O U RT : M a r k J . L a n g e r , C le r k B Y : /s/ D a n ie l J . R e id y D e p u ty C le r k
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10486

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

EDDIE LEE FINLEY,

Defendant–Appellant.

______________________

Cons w/ 10-10489

Summary Calendar

______________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee,

v.

EDDIE LEE FINLEY, JR.

Plaintiff-Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:09-CR-232-1 and 3:09-CR-115-1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 15, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 10-10486 Document: 00511411131 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/15/2011
No. 10-10486 c/w 10-10489

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eddie Lee Finley has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, ___ F.3d ___, No. 09-

41281, 2011 WL 309173 (5th Cir. Jan. 31, 2011). Finley has not filed a response.

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents

no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

2

Case: 10-10486 Document: 00511411131 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/15/2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

JOHN E. WETZEL, et al.,

Defendant.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:21-CV-01819

(MEHALCHICK, J.)

ORDER

In accordance with the memorandum filed the same day it is hereby ordered that the 

Report and Recommendation of Judge Carlson, (Doc. 172), is ADOPTED IN ITS 

ENTIRETY as the decision of the Court. Plaintiff’s objections, (Doc. 175), are 

OVERRULED, and Plaintiffs’ claims will be SEVERED. George Lopez’s claims shall 

proceed in this action, No. 3:21-CV-01819, and the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to open 

new civil actions for each of the remaining Plaintiffs.

Dated: April 4, 2024 s/ Karoline Mehalchick 

KAROLINE MEHALCHICK

United States District Judge

Case 3:21-cv-01819-KM Document 192 Filed 04/04/24 Page 1 of 1
#### Charles Lee WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-9.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 16, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed.
### SERVE D APRI L 29 , 201 0
U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C
. ^^PICFTR'HS f

o . o


### I N TH EMATTE RO F DARB Y AVIATION , Respondent
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP08SO002 6 (Civi l Penalty Proceeding ) DM S NO
. FAA-2008-119 2
ADMINISTRATIV ELA WJUDGE' S TRANSCRIP T CORRECTION S Pag e 5 6 1 8 4 5 4 8 5 0 5 2 6 7 6 7 10 1 10 8 10 8 Lin e

1 1 8 5 1 6 2 2 1 4 1 7 9 9 5 6 7 Chang e

throug hth e four

room s decid e potentia l i n staf f JUDG EBENKI N lynchpi n
o f directio n from QAn d fac e T o Rea d t o th e four

wind s asid e primary
o f statut e MS
. WEIDNE R linchpi n i n direc t for m Q b y MR
. VEA l bas e145

15 3 15 7 16 1 167 17 0 19 0 19 1 19 8 19 8 24 4 25 2 28 4 29 2 29 3 33 5 33 8 43 1 43 1 43 5 44 2 44 2 44 2 1

8 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 4 5 2 1 3 5 1 8 3 1 1 7 3 4 1 3 1 3 1 8 1 9 I

MR
. VEATC H MR
. VEATC H MR
. VEATC H
o n b y Q Okay , Clar k decadenc e decadenc e Q
. you'r e too l thi s doo r unde r you r estimat e it' s proble mi s a knowledg e th e chec k writ e Mine r assistant
. 

### MS
. WEIDNE R MS
. WEIDNE

R MS
. WEIDNE

R
no fo r Q B y MR
. VEATC

H Fox deferenc e deferenc e by MS
. WEIDNE

R you r school th e stor e until you'r e instrumen t delet e it' s problemi s it' s a knowledg e chec

k wrot e Mino r assistan t

### 44 3

53 6 53 8 56 1 

### 8

9 2 1 0 matc h



### ha s 

### ha d FA A matte r ha d han d FAA' s

Isaa c D
. Benki n Administrativ e La w Judg eFA A Docke t No
. CP08SO002 6 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T - CORRECTE D ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y
Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC^3 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Deann aL
. Weidner , Respondent' s Counse l Anderso n & Associates , LL C 50 5 20" " Stree t

North Financial Center , Suit e 145 0 Birmingham , A L3520 3 TEL : 205-324-123 0 Fax : 205-322-389 0 E-MAIL : dlweidner(a).davidbandersonlaw.co m Raymon dVeatch , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Coimse l Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 170 1 Columbi aAv e Colleg e Park , GA 3033 7 TEL : 202-267-967 6 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D
. Benkin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorne y 202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

* Service wa

s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e th

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviation Administration , 600 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430
.
```

[House Document 113-56]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

113th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 113-56

 
 CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO EXPORT CONTROL 
                              REGULATIONS

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

 CONTINUATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO EXPORT CONTROL 
                              REGULATIONS

 September 6, 2013.--Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 
                         ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                        Washington, August 8, 2013.
Hon. John Boehner,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: Section 202(d) of the National 
Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)) provides for the automatic 
termination of a national emergency unless, within the 90-day 
period prior to the anniversary date of its declaration, the 
President publishes in the Federal Register and transmits to 
the Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue 
in effect beyond the anniversary date. In accordance with this 
provision, I have sent to the Federal Register for publication 
the enclosed notice, stating that the emergency caused by the 
lapse of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, is 
to continue in effect for 1 year beyond August 17, 2013.

            Sincerely,
                                                      Barack Obama.
                                 Notice

                              ----------                              

 Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Export Control 
                              Regulations

    On August 17, 2001, consistent with the authority provided 
to the President under the International Emergency Economic 
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), the President issued 
Executive Order 13222. In that order, he declared a national 
emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat 
to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the 
United States in light of the expiration of the Export 
Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2401 et 
seq.). Because the Export Administration Act has not been 
renewed by the Congress, the national emergency declared on 
August 17, 2001, must continue in effect beyond August 17, 
2013. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the 
National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing 
for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 
13222.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and 
transmitted to the Congress.

                                                      Barack Obama.
    The White House, August 8, 2013.

                                  

```
August 26, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HASSAN S. HOSSEINI, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00169-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Herbert MAGNES, Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, Appellee.

No. 69-134.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 18, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49648-49649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[PA58-4039; AD-FRL-5897-2]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Pennsylvania; Pennsylvania Power--New Castle NO<INF>X</INF> RACT 
Proposal; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of the comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is reopening the comment period for a proposed rule 
published on August 18, 1997 (62 FR 43959). In the August 18 document, 
EPA proposed to disapprove the April 19, 1995 Pennsylvania Department 
of

[[Page 49649]]

Environmental Protection proposal for nitrogen oxide reasonably 
available control technology (NO<INF>X</INF> RACT) for the Pennsylvania 
Power--New Castle plant located in Lawrence County. At the request of 
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, attorneys representing 
Pennsylvania Power--New Castle plant, EPA is extending the comment 
period through November 18, 1997.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 18, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to David L. Arnold, Chief, Ozone/CO 
and Mobile Sources Section, Mailcode 3AT21, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, 
Pennsylvania 19107.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia H. Stahl, U.S. EPA Region III, 
(215) 566-2180.

    Dated: September 16, 1997.
W. Michael McCabe,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 97-25224 Filed 9-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION  Pursuant to 18 United States Code §1350  As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certify that to our knowledge the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 of Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A. (the "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: April 16, 2010By:

/s/ ZEINAL ABEDIN MAHOMMED BAVAName:

Zeinal Abedin Mahommed BavaTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDate: April 16, 2010By:

/s/ LUIS PACHECO DE MELOName:

Luis Pacheco de MeloTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


This
certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F and shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

---



QuickLinks
PUBLIC LAW 104–47—NOV. 13, 1995 109 STAT. 423

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2589:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 141 (1995):

Nov. 7, considered and passed House.

Nov. 9, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 104–47

104th Congress

An Act

To extend authorities under the Middle East Peace Facilitation Act of 1994 until

December 31, 1995, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITIES.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations

Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103–

236), as amended by Public Law 104–30, is amended by striking

‘‘November 1, 1995’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 1995’’.

(b) CONSULTATION.—For purposes of any exercise of the authority provided in section 583(a) of the Foreign Relations Authorization

Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (Public Law 103–236) prior to

November 14, 1995, the written policy justification dated June

1, 1995, and submitted to the Congress in accordance with section

583(b)(1) of such Act, and the consultations associated with such

policy justification, shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements

of section 583(b)(1) of such Act.

Approved November 13, 1995.

Ante, p. 277.

Nov. 13, 1995

[H.R. 2589]
EXHIBIT 32 (A)


                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Evelyn
F. Smalls, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ Evelyn F. Smalls
----------------------
Evelyn F. Smalls
Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2004
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10950

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Carrington Marshall Thomas, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:20-CR-90-1

Before King, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Carrington Marshall Thomas has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Thomas has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 18, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10950 Document: 00515867065 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/18/2021
No. 20-10950

2

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as 

Thomas’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th 

Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 20-10950 Document: 00515867065 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/18/2021