USA Banner
  U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Here's how you knowOfficial US Government Icon
              **Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
            Secure Site Icon
              **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
 U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation
 Search DOT
            Search
                    About FHWAFHWA Organization
                Headquarters Offices
                Field Offices
                Strategic Plan
                Business Opportunities
                Staff Directories
                Careers
                Highway History
                Contact UsProgramsAcquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                Safety
                Browse by TopicsResourcesCore Highway Topics
                Federal Aid Essentials
                Automation
                Complete Streets
                Laws and Regulations
                Policy & Guidance Center
                Section 508
                Publications and Statistics
                Professional Development
                National Highway Institute
                Resource Center
                Accessibility Resource Library
                FHWA Research LibraryNewsroomPress Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Photos
                Videos
                Media ContactsMenu FHWA Highway Safety Programs Home
                        HSIP Noteworthy Practice Series


            
            In This Section
        Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
                                Overview
                About
                Planning
                Implementing
                Evaluating
                Reporting
                Noteworthy Practices
                Legislation and Guidance
                Resources
                HSIP Special Rules
                Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)
                                Overview
                About
                Develop
                Implement
                Evaluate
                Promote
                Legislation and Guidance
                Resources
                Noteworthy Practices
                Safety Performance Measure
                                Overview
                State Safety Performance Targets
                Policy & Guidance
                Fact Sheets & Informational Webinars
                Target-Setting Resources
                Safety Data Resources
                State Safety Reports
                Safety Contacts
                Technical Assistance & Training
                Railway Highway Crossing Program
                                Overview
                Policy and Guidance
                Resources
                
                HSIP Project Evaluation
Evaluation is critical to determine if a project or group of projects is achieving the desired results and to ensure investments are cost-effective. Evaluation provides a quantitative estimate of the effects on safety, which is valuable information for future planning. Evaluation results enable a state to determine if appropriate countermeasures were used at particular locations, whether any adverse impacts occurred, if corrective action is necessary, and how effective those countermeasures would be for similar sites in the future.

Various methods exist for evaluating projects, but any evaluation should consider a minimum of three to five years of before and after crash data, the target crash type of the improvement, and crash severity (a countermeasure may increase the total number of crashes, but reduce the crash severity). Ideally, project evaluation should incorporate more advanced techniques (e.g., safety performance functions (SPFs), Empirical Bayes (EB) method) to account for natural fluctuations in crashes from year to year and other changes potentially impacting evaluation results.

The majority of states are conducting project evaluations based on a simple before-after analysis, and a few are using evaluation results to develop state-specific crash modification factors (CMFs) for various countermeasures. While simple before-after evaluations are rather easy to perform and may provide a basic understanding of safety changes, they assume any change was due solely to the safety improvement at the site and may misrepresent the true effectiveness of a project due to the effects of regression-to-the-mean. (Regression-to-the-mean bias describes a situation in which crash rates are artificially high (or low) during the before period and would have decreased (or increased) even without an improvement to the site.) The EB method can be incorporated into project evaluations to reduce the effects of regression-to-the-mean. However, very few states have been able to use the EB method since it requires calibrated SPFs. Many states do not have the training, resources, tools, manpower, or necessary data to calibrate SPFs.

Another challenge is that individual states may not have enough installations of a particular countermeasure to develop quality CMFs. The Evaluations of Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study (ELCSI PFS) combines the implementation efforts of multiple states to develop reliable estimates of countermeasure effectiveness. States can independently initiate similar efforts.

Noteworthy Practices

The following cases demonstrate noteworthy practices four states are using in HSIP project evaluations:

The Colorado DOT developed SPFs for all roadway facility and intersection types in the State, which enabled the DOT to institutionalize the EB method into all safety project evaluations and reduce the effects of regression-to-the-mean.(read more)
	The Florida DOT developed an on-line database application of safety improvement projects that automates the processes for conducting benefit-cost analysis to compare different countermeasures and for conducting safety project evaluations to develop crash reduction factors (CRF). The application has also enabled Florida to develop and continue to refine state-specific CRFs for several countermeasures based on the project evaluation results. (read more)
	The North Carolina DOT created a safety project evaluation group to conduct evaluations on all spot safety projects in the State. The project evaluations provided field engineers with valuable feedback on the effectiveness of safety projects and countermeasures. (read more)
	The University of Wisconsin Traffic Operations and Safety (TOPS) Laboratory, under contract to Wisconsin DOT, developed a project evaluation process incorporating EB analysis into all HSIP project evaluations. The TOPS Laboratory compared benefit-cost analysis using simple before-after analysis results and EB to demonstrate the importance of using statistical evaluations to reduce the overestimation of safety benefits due to regression-to-the-mean. (read more)To access these full case studies, click on the individual links above or visit the FHWA Office of Safety on-line at: www.fhwa.dot.gov/safety/legislative-safety-programs/hsip
      
  Project Evaluations Using Empirical Bayes – Colorado
                Crash Reduction Analysis System Hub – Florida
                Safety Evaluation Group – North Carolina
                University Conducting HSIP Project Evaluations Using Empirical Bayes – WisconsinBook traversal links for HSIP Project Evaluation
      ‹ Level of Service of Safety and Diagnostic Analysis – Colorado
                    Up
                    Project Evaluations Using Empirical Bayes – Colorado ›
                
                Book:HSIP Noteworthy Practice Series
              HSIP Project Identification
                                Safety Warrants and Spot Safety Index – North Carolina
                Implementation of Systemwide Improvements – Missouri
                Funding Goals for Proactive Improvements – Minnesota
                Development of SPFs for All State Routes and Intersections – Illinois
                Level of Service of Safety and Diagnostic Analysis – Colorado
                HSIP Project Evaluation
                                Project Evaluations Using Empirical Bayes – Colorado
                Crash Reduction Analysis System Hub – Florida
                Safety Evaluation Group – North Carolina
                University Conducting HSIP Project Evaluations Using Empirical Bayes – Wisconsin
                Safety Data Collection, Analysis, and Sharing
                                Law Enforcement Expert for Improved Data Collection – Louisiana
                Data Analysis for County Highway Safety Plans – Minnesota
                Data Sharing and Decision Support Tool – New Jersey
                SHSP Stakeholder Involvement
                                Statewide and Regional SHSP Coalitions – Missouri
                SHSP Road Shows – Nevada
                Engaging Native American Tribes in the SHSP – Washington
                MPO Safety Management Planning – Cheyenne, Wyoming
                Revisiting SHSP Emphasis Areas
                                Focusing on Fewer Emphasis Areas – West Virginia
                Tiered Emphasis Areas for Statewide and County Safety Planning – Washington
                Speeding and Aggressive Driving and Distracted Driving Task Forces – Louisiana
                Use of the HSIP Flexible Funding Provision
                                Alabama Flexes HSIP Funds for Increased Enforcement – Alabama
                Michigan Uses HSIP Flex Funds for Winter Safe Driving Campaign – Michigan
                Nevada Funds Education and Outreach Programs with HSIP Flex Funds – Nevada
                Utah Flexes HSIP Funds to Enhance Partners’ Safety Efforts – Utah
                SHSP – Leadership that Saves Lives
                SHSP – Get Involved! U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Highway Administration**

1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE

WASHINGTON, DC 20590

202-366-4000Subscribe to email updates
                    About
  

        
              About FHWA
                Careers
                Org Chart
                Staff Directories
                Work with UsPrograms
  

        
              Acquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                SafetyPolicies, Rights, Legal
  

        
              About DOT
                Accessibility
                Budget and Performance
                Civil Rights
                FOIA
                Information Quality
                No FEAR Act
                Office of Inspector General
                Privacy Policy
                USA.gov
                Web Policies and Notices
                Web StandardsNews & Events
  

        
              Newsroom
                Press Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Media Contacts
                Connect with Us