alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6985** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ISABEL GONZALEZ, a/k/a Chabello, a/k/a Isabel Garcia , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United Stat es District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:00

- cr - 00077

- BO

- 1; 5:02

- cv - 00726

- BO )

Submitted : January 13, 2011 Decided: January 19, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Isabel Gonzalez, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Isabel Gonzalez seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) ; Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Ci r. 2004).
A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constituti onal right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is d ebatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gonzalez has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts3 and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2886 

To permit manufacturers of generic drugs to provide additional warnings 

with respect to such drugs in the same manner that the Food and 

Drug Administration allows brand names to do so. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN (for himself, Mr. BROWN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Mr. 

COONS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To permit manufacturers of generic drugs to provide additional warnings with respect to such drugs in the same 

manner that the Food and Drug Administration allows 

brand names to do so. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Updated Drug Label5 ing for Patient Safety Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2886 IS

1 SEC. 2. WARNING LABELING WITH RESPECT TO GENERIC 

2 DRUGS. 

3 Section 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos4 metic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(14)(A) Notwithstanding any other provision 

7 of this Act, the holder of an approved application 

8 under this subsection may change the labeling of a 

9 drug so approved in the same manner authorized by 

10 regulation for the holder of an approved new drug 

11 application under subsection (b). 

12 ‘‘(B) In the event of a labeling change made 

13 under subparagraph (A), the Secretary may order 

14 conforming changes to the labeling of the equivalent 

15 listed drug and each drug approved under this sub16 section that corresponds to such listed drug.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52150-52151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26428]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as 
Amended

    Consistent with Departmental policy, 28 CFR Sec. 50.7, and 42 
U.S.C. Sec. 9622(d), notice is hereby given that on September 19, 1997, 
a proposed consent decree in United States v. Ray O. Parker & Son, et 
al., Civil Action No. 2:97-CV-313, was lodged with the United States 
District Court for the District of Vermont. This proposed consent 
decree resolves the United States claims under the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), 
42 U.S.C. Sec. 9601 et seq., on behalf of the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency (``EPA'') against 15 defendants relating to response 
costs that have been or will be incurred at or from a Site known as the 
Parker Landfill Superfund Site (``Site'') located in the Town of 
Lyndon, Vermont and to the performance of a portion of the remedial 
action at the Site.
    The consent decree has two components. The first aspect of the 
settlement requires six defendants to perform a portion of the remedial 
action at the Site, comprised of the construction of the cap at the 
Site. In addition, nine parties have entered into a de minimis 
settlement pursuant to Section 122(g) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 
Sec. 9622(g). Under the terms of the de minimis settlement, the nine 
defendants will pay $1,134,000 for past and future response costs at 
the Site, plus a premium payment, which amount will be paid to the six 
parties performing work at the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Any comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and Natural Resources 
Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should 
refer to United States v. Parker & Son, et al., D.J. Ref. 90-11-2-1120.

[[Page 52151]]

    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, 11 Elmwood Ave., Burlington, Vt. 05401, at the 
Region I office of the Environmental Protection Agency, JFK Federal 
Building, Boston, Ma., 02203-2211, and at the Consent Decree Library, 
1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 624-0892. 
A copy of the proposed consent decree may be obtained in person or by 
mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, 
Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check 
(there is a 25 cent per page reproduction cost) in the amount of $40.75 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Bruce Gelber,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-26428 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(l)
             AMENDMENT #12 TO LOAN AGREEMENT DATED DECEMBER 1, 2001

                                 William Farber
                               32640 Whatley Road
                            Franklin, Michigan 48025

                                December 1, 2001

Mr. Larry Dalesandro Lannett Company, Inc. 9000 State Road Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19136

    Re: Loan Agreement between William Farber ("Lender") and Lannett Company,
Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Borrower") dated August 30, 1991, as amended by
Amendment #1 to Loan Agreement dated as of March 15, 1993, and by letter
agreements dated August 1, 1994, May 15, 1995, December 31, 1995, June 30, 1996,
November 1, 1996, September 9, 1997, June 30, 1998, December 30, 1998, December
31, 1999, October 1, 2000, and October 1, 2001.

Dear Larry:

This letter confirms that the Maturity Date for the Revolving Credit Loan (as
defined in the Loan Agreement) is extended to December 1, 2002.


                                Very Truly Yours

                                By: /s/ William Farber

                                    William Farber


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

LANNETT COMPANY, INC.

By: /s/ Larry Dalesandro

 Larry Dalesandro, Chief Operating Officer

                                       23
EXHIBIT 10.2

                    FIRST AMENDED BUSINESS CONSULTING CONTRACT
11-1-01

TO: Dr Waseem Sayed
    Sayed Consulting Inc
    2400Ridgeway Dr Suit 409
    Chino Hill, CA 91709

Dear Dr Waseem Sayed:

Based upon our various conversations Capco Energy Inc. (Capco) agrees to
substitute the agreement executed between Capco and Sayed Consulting Inc (SCI)
as of 4-20-01, herein referred to as "The Agreement" and this First Amended
Agreement herein referred to as the "Amended Agreement".

The terms and conditions of the Amended Agreement are as follows:

1.   SCI shall be retained to provide the marketing and financial services to
     Capco on a continuous basis until 12-31-02 or any other date the parties
     chose on a mutual consent basis.

2.   The services shall include but not limited to: Investor relations with
     current shareholders, effective dissemination of the Company's message to
     the financial community, news releases and other related activities as
     directed by Capco.

3.   SCI shall also provide assistance to list the Company on a major exchange.

4.   Capco shall pay a consulting fee amounting to $3000 monthly and $2000(upon
     exercise of options as described herein below) plus non-accountable
     expenses of $2000/month, which shall include local auto expense, telephone,
     computer and other miscellaneous office expenses. In addition Capco shall
     reimburse all other accountable expenses in relations to travel out of
     Location, which is undertaken by SCI, which are approved by Capco.

5.   In Consideration for the services provided and in addition of the cash
     disbursement as provided for herein above, Capco shall provide 150,000 paid
     shares of Capco stock (Delivered already) and grant options to SCI to
     acquire 500,000 shares of Capco at $0.93/per share expiring March 31st 02
     and additional options to acquire 600,000 shares of Capco at $1.15/share
     expiring 6-30-02. In addition so long as the contract is in force by
     December 31st 2002 and all the previous options have been exercised then
     Capco shall grant an additional options to SCI to acquire 150,000 share of
     Capco at $1.75 per share expiring March 31, 2003 or within 90 days of the
     termination of the Amended Agreement which ever is later.

<PAGE>

6.   Either party can terminate this contract by giving a notice of 2 weeks to
     the other party. Capco's obligation in the event of termination by either
     part shall be to pay all the unpaid but approved expenses and consulting
     fees up to the date of termination.

7.   Upon the Execution of the Amended Agreement, all the terms of the Agreement
     as well as any other written and verbal agreement(s) shall be void.


     If the above terms are acceptable then please execute a copy and forward to
my attention by 11-06-01.

Sincerely yours,                                     Accepted:

/s/ Ilyas Chaudhary                                  /s/ Waseem Sayed
-------------------                                  ----------------
Ilyas Chaudhary                                      Waseem Sayed
President
Capco Energy Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences; 
Committee of Visitors; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Committee for Social Behavioral, and Economic 
Sciences, Committee of Visitors (1171).
    Date and Time: October 23-24, 1997, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: Rm. 970 & 920, NSF, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Drs. Frank P. Scioli, Jr., and Rick Wilson, 
Program Directors for Political Science, National Science 
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 
(703) 306-1761.
    Purpose of Meeting: To carry out Committee of Visitors (COV) 
review, including examination of decisions on proposals, reviewer 
comments, and other privileged materials.
    Agenda: To provide oversight review of the Political Science 
Program.
    Reason for Closing: The meeting is closed to the public because 
the Committee is reviewing proposal actions that will include 
privileged intellectual property and personal information that could 
harm individuals if they are disclosed. If discussions were open to 
the public, these matters that are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) 
and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act would be improperly 
disclosed.

    Dated: September 29, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-26137 Filed 10-1-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHAEL LEE MYERS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Civil Action No. 05-309 Erie

v. )

)

DR. GADDIS, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This civil rights action was initiated on October 20, 2005, and was referred to

United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation

in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and

72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 16], filed on

April 21, 2006, recommended that the matter be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The

parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service

was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. No objections were filed. 

After de novo review of the complaint and documents in the case, together with the

Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED for failure to

prosecute. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 16] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on April 21, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00309-SJM-SPB Document 17 Filed 05/10/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 193 (Monday, October 6, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 52034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-26468]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

42 CFR Part 418

[BPD-820-CN]
RIN 0938-AG93


Medicare Program; Hospice Wage Index; Correction

AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS.

ACTION: Correction notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the final rule published August 8, 1997 
(62 FR 42859), that established a methodology to update the wage index 
used to adjust Medicare payment rates for hospice care included in the 
new wage index, to be effective October 1, 1997. This notice corrects 
the wage index entry for Cherokee, GA.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carol Blackford, (410) 786-5909.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are making the following correction to 
the final rule published in the Federal Register on August 8, 1997 (62 
FR 42859):
    On page 42864, in the first column ``Urban area (constituent 
counties or county equivalent)'', under Table A, the wage index entry 
for Cherokee, GA, ``0.9841'', is corrected to read ``0.9822''.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773, 
Medicare--Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare--
Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)

    Dated: September 30, 1997.
Neil J. Stillman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Information Resources Management.
[FR Doc. 97-26468 Filed 10-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-M
#### Honorable Paul BAKER, as Judge of the Criminal Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida ex rel. Richard E. GERSTEIN, as State Attorney of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40876.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 21, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 190 (Wednesday, October 1, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51462-51463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25964]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Docket Nos. RP97-346-006 and RP93-187-014]
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Equitrans, L.P.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

September 25, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 19, 1997, Equitrans, L.P. 
(``Equitrans'') tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff the 
following revised tariff sheets:

First Revised Eighth Revised Sheet No. 5
First Revised Eighth Revised Sheet No. 6
First Revised Eighth Revised Sheet No. 7
First Revised Eighth Revised Sheet No. 8
First Revised Eighth Revised Sheet No. 10

Equitrans proposes an effective date of August 1, 1997 for these tariff 
sheets.

Second Sub Fifth Revised Sheet No. 7
Second Sub Fifth Revised Sheet No. 7A
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 255
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 256

    Equitrans proposes an effective date of September 1, 1997 for these 
tariff sheets.
    Equitrans states that these revised tariff sheets are submitted in 
compliance with the Commission's September 10, 1997 Order Accepting 
Primary Tariff Sheets Subject to Conditions and Rejecting Alternative 
Tariff Sheets for the purpose of: (1) filing revised tariff sheets that 
comply with the prior rate settlement in Docket No. RP93-187, et al. to 
be effective August 1, 1997 establishing rates for all services which 
reflect the elimination of gathering costs from transportation rates 
and establishment of separate gathering and transportation retainage 
levels; and (2) filing revised tariff sheets to be effective September 
1, 1997 eliminating the stranded gathering surcharge from the rates 
charged for Equitrans open access and individually certificated storage 
services.
    Copies of this rate filing were served on the parties to this 
proceeding, as well as Equitrans' jurisdictional customers and 
interested state commissions, and a copy of the rate filing has been 
posted and is available for inspection at Equitrans' corporate 
headquarters during regular business hours.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest the filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20046, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure. All such motions or protests should be filed as

[[Page 51463]]

provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining appropriate action, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25964 Filed 9-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PANTELIS ANTONAKEAS, )

)

Petitioner, )

) Civil Action No. 05-305 Erie

v. )

)

JAMES SHERMAN, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

MEMORANDUM ORDER

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on October 18,

2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for

report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. 

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 15], filed on

November 7, 2006, recommended that Petitioner’s Petition be denied and that

Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 14] be denied as moot. The

parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service

was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondent. Objections were filed by

Petitioner on November 27, 2006 [Doc. No. 16]. After de novo review of the petition

and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the

objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2006; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is DENIED and Petitioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 14] is

DENIED as moot. 

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 15] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed

on November 7, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

 s/ Sean J. McLaughlin

United States District Judge

cm: All parties of record

Case 1:05-cv-00305-SJM-SPB Document 17 Filed 11/28/06 Page 1 of 2
2

Susan Paradise Baxter, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 1:05-cv-00305-SJM-SPB Document 17 Filed 11/28/06 Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 24, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00576

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.J.B.ET AL., CHILDREN,

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- PA

- 00411

Honorable Martha B. Tanner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant Miguel Angel Reyes' motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal is

hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of September, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court