alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25985]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-4285-N-01]


Debenture Recall

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing 
Commissioner, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a debenture recall of certain Federal 
Housing Administration debentures, in accordance with authority 
provided in the National Housing Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Keyser, Room B133, Department 
of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20410, telephone (202) 755-7510. This is not a toll-free number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 207(j) of the National 
Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. 1713(j), and in accordance with HUD regulations 
at 24 CFR 207.259(e)(3), the Federal Housing Commissioner, with 
approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, announces the call of all 
Federal Housing Administration debentures, with a coupon rate of 6.75% 
or above, except for those debentures subject to ``debenture lock 
agreements,'' that have been registered on the books of the Federal 
Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, and are, therefore, ``outstanding'' as of 
September 30, 1997. The date of the call is January 1, 1998.
    The debenture will be redeemed at par plus accrued interest. 
Interest will cease to accrue on the debentures as of the call date. 
Final interest on any called debentures will be paid with the principal 
at redemption. During the period from the date of this notice to the 
call date, debentures that are subject to the call may not be used by 
the mortgagee for a special redemption purchase in payment of a 
mortgage insurance premium.
    No transfer of debentures covered by the foregoing call will be 
made on the books maintained by the Treasury Department on or after 
October 1, 1997. This does not affect the right of the holder of a 
debenture to sell or assign the debenture on or after this date. 
Payment of final principal and interest due on January 1, 1998, will be 
made automatically to the registered holder.

    Dated: September 25, 1997.
Nicolas P. Retsinas,
Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 97-25985 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-27-P
#### Jessie GUITREAU et ux. v. John L. KINCHEN et al.

No. 61463.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

In re: Jessie Guitreau, et ux. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 11,646. Parish of Tangipahoa. 356 So.2d 493.

Writ granted. Appeal reinstated.
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-111466, 333-111467, 333-111469 and 333-116114 on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement No. 333-122215 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 28, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of The DIRECTV Group, Inc. (which
report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the change in the Company's method of accounting for subscriber acquisition, upgrade and retention costs
effective January 1, 2004 and the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans
effective December 31, 2006) and management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The DIRECTV Group, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2006.

|/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |  |  |  | 
|------------------------ |  |  |  | 

Los
Angeles, California
February 28, 2007

---
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 00-918 

________________________________________________________________________ 

ATOMIC ENERGY 

Reactors 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and FRANCE 

Signed at Vienna September 18, 2000 

with 

Annex 

 

and 

Agreement Amending the Agreement 

Signed at Washington January 24, 2006 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 FRANCE 

 

 Atomic Energy: Reactors 

 Agreement signed at Vienna September 18, 2000; 

 Entered into force September 18, 2000. 

 With annex. 

 And agreement amending the agreement. 

 Signed at Washington January 24, 2006; 

 Entered into force January 24, 2006. 





Note: At the present time, the Treaty Office does not have the French text of this Agreement. If the French text becomes available, it will be added to this publication.
#### Idabel Q. VANDEVANDER v. The MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 49690.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 9, 1977.

Gifford & Permenter, Eugene B. Gifford, Jr., Booneville, for appellant.

Smith, Downs, Coleman & Ross, Wendell H. Trapp, Jr., Corinth, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and ROBERTSON and SUGG, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Prentiss County; Fred Wicker, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 105 (Thursday, May 31, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32088-32089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13184]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

EPA Board of Scientific Counselors Advisory Board; Notice of 
Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Charter Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) has determined that, in accordance with the provisions of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App.2, the EPA Board of 
Scientific Counselors Advisory Board (BOSC) is a necessary committee 
which is in the public interest. Accordingly, BOSC will be renewed for 
an additional two-year period. The purpose of BOSC is to provide advice 
and recommendations to the Administrator regarding science and 
engineering research, programs and plans, laboratories, and research-
management practices. Inquiries may be directed to Greg Susanke, U.S. 
EPA, (Mail Code 8104R), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20460, telephone (202) 564-9945, or susanke.greg@epa.gov.

[[Page 32089]]

    Dated: March 6, 2012.
Lek Kadeli,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Research and Development.
[FR Doc. 2012-13184 Filed 5-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
EXHIBIT 13.1  CERTIFICATION Pursuant to 18 United States Code §1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  The undersigned hereby certify that to our knowledge the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 of Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A. (the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 6, 2011By:
/s/   Zeinal Abedin Mahommed BavaName:
Zeinal Abedin Mahommed BavaTitle:
Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 6, 2011By:
/s/   Luis Pacheco de MeloName:
Luis Pacheco de MeloTitle:
Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2155 

To provide meaningful civil remedies for victims of the sexual exploitation 

of children. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20, 2005 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. ISAKSON) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide meaningful civil remedies for victims of the sexual 

exploitation of children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CIVIL REMEDIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2255(a) of title 18, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in the first sentence— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘(a) Any minor who is’’ 

8 and inserting the following: 

9 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Any person who, while a minor, 

10 was’’; 
2 

•S 2155 IS

1 (B) by inserting after ‘‘such violation’’ the 

2 following: ‘‘, regardless of whether the injury 

3 occurred while such person was a minor,’’; and 

4 (C) by striking ‘‘such minor’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘such person’’; and 

6 (2) in the second sentence— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘Any minor’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘Any person’’; and 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘$50,000’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘$150,000’’. 

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 2255(b) of 

12 title 18, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘(b) 

13 Any action’’ and inserting the following: 

14 ‘‘(b) STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.—Any action’’. 

Æ
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 1:28 PM

To: 'randy@randyharrisphoto.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Request for Additional Information: Randy Harris (FAA-2015-1215)

Dear Mr. Harris 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. 

FAA-2015−1215). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process 

your petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make, model, and type (i.e., fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. This information can be located in the aircraft manual. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If 

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by August 7, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2767 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2767

 To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to update the resource 
          limit for supplemental security income eligibility.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2023

Mr. Brown (for himself, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Wyden, Ms. Collins, Mr. Casey, 
 and Mr. Lankford) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to update the resource 
          limit for supplemental security income eligibility.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SSI Savings Penalty Elimination 
Act''.

SEC. 2. UPDATE IN ELIGIBILITY FOR THE SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) Update in Resource Limit for Individuals and Couples.--Section 
1611(a)(3) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1382(a)(3)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``$2,250'' and all 
        that follows through the end of the subparagraph and inserting 
        ``$20,000 in calendar year 2023, and shall be increased as 
        described in section 1617(d) for each subsequent calendar 
        year.''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``$1,500'' and all 
        that follows through the end of the subparagraph and inserting 
        ``$10,000 in calendar year 2023, and shall be increased as 
        described in section 1617(d) for each subsequent calendar 
        year.''.
    (b) Inflation Adjustment.--Section 1617 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
1382f) is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by inserting ``; inflation 
        adjustment'' after ``benefits''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) In the case of any calendar year after 2023, each of the 
amounts specified in section 1611(a)(3) shall be increased by 
multiplying each such amount by the quotient (not less than 1) obtained 
by dividing--
            ``(1) the average of the consumer price index for all urban 
        consumers (all items; United States city average, as published 
        by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor) 
        for the 12-month period ending with September of the preceding 
        calendar year, by
            ``(2) such average for the 12-month period ending with 
        September 2022.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 

PAUL E. SPARKMAN, SR., 

individually and as administrator of 

THE ESTATE OF PAUL E. 

SPARKMAN, JR., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

POTTER COUNTY, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 No. 4:24-CV-1338 

 (Chief Judge Brann) 

 

ORDER 

JANUARY 21, 2025 

 In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Defendant University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Charles Cole 

Memorial Hospital’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 13) is GRANTED. 

2. Defendant Counselor Dawn Dovensky’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 29) 

is DENIED. 

3. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint no later than February 4, 

2025. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, the claims 

against UPMC Cole will be subject to dismissal with prejudice. 

4. Counselor Dovensky’s answer to the complaint is due no later than 

seven days after the deadline for Plaintiff to submit an amended 

Case 4:24-cv-01338-MWB Document 40 Filed 01/21/25 Page 1 of 2
2 

complaint, unless an amended complaint is filed, in which case the 

normal deadline to answer an amended complaint shall apply (see

Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3)). 

 BY THE COURT: 

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

 Matthew W. Brann 

 Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:24-cv-01338-MWB Document 40 Filed 01/21/25 Page 2 of 2
#### GREENBERG v. WOOTEN.

No. 38667.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certified question denied without opinion.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

____________________________________

:

KEVIN MARLOWE, :

:

Petitioner, :

: Civil Action No. 3:15-CV-1774

v. :

:

JENNIFER BOWSER, et al., : (Judge Kosik)

:

Respondents. :

____________________________________

ORDER

AND NOW, THIS 16 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015, IT APPEARING TO THE

th

COURT THAT:

[1] Petitioner, Kevin Marlowe, a federal prisoner housed in a half-way house, the Capitol

Pavilion, filed pro se, the instant petition on September 11, 2015 (Doc. 1), raising concerns

regarding the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) levying a tax on his travel reimbursement expenses; 

[2] The action was referred to Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson;

[3] On October 2, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued Respondents an Order to Show

Cause (Doc. 5);

[4] On October 19, 2015, Petitioner filed a response to the order (Doc. 7), in which

Petitioner stated, “After filing my petition with this court, the BOP has conceded and stated that

they will not levy their tax on this expense. They have returned my money order. This is a

wonderful and correct step in settling this petition.”

[5] On October 21, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation

Case 3:15-cv-01774-EMK-LQ Document 10 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 2
(Doc. 9), recommending that Marlowe’s petition be dismissed as moot in light of Marlowe’s

letter to the Court, stating that the BOP stopped levying the tax and returned the money order;

[6] Plaintiff has failed to file timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation;

AND, IT FURTHER APPEARING THAT:

[7] If no objections are filed to a Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, the

Plaintiff is not statutorily entitled to a de novo review of his claims. 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(C);

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150-53 (1985). Nonetheless, the usual practice of the district

court is to give “reasoned consideration” to a magistrate judge’s report prior to adopting it. 

Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987);

[8] We have considered the Magistrate Judge’s report and we concur with his

recommendation. We agree that the BOP not levying a tax on Marlowe’s travel reimbursement

expenses and the return of his money order, eliminates Marlowe’s personal stake in the outcome. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

[1] The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson dated

October 21, 2015 (Doc. 9) is ADOPTED;

[2] Marlowe’s Petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; and

[3] The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case and FORWARD a copy of this

Order to the Magistrate Judge.

s/Edwin M. Kosik 

Edwin M. Kosik

United States District Judge 

Case 3:15-cv-01774-EMK-LQ Document 10 Filed 11/16/15 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:04-cv-00312-SJM-SPB   Document 11   Filed 04/11/06   Page 1 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00312-SJM-SPB   Document 11   Filed 04/11/06   Page 2 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00312-SJM-SPB   Document 11   Filed 04/11/06   Page 3 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00312-SJM-SPB   Document 11   Filed 04/11/06   Page 4 of 4

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2014-03-10T23:05:33-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
**Exhibit 24.1**

 

Power of Attorney

 

Each person whosesignature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Robert L. Norton andCarrie A. Wolfe, and each of them, as his or her true and lawfulattorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of and substitution andresubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in anyand all capacities, to sign FTD, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended June 30, 2002 and any and all amendments thereto, and to filethe same, with all exhibits and schedules thereto, and other documentstherewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and hereby grants untosuch attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and performeach and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done, as fully to allintents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifyingand confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his or hersubstitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

This Power of Attorneymay be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed anoriginal and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one and thesame document.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned have hereunto set their hands as of the ninth day of September,2002.

 
|   | /s/ ROBERT L. NORTON         |   |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert L. Norton             |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   | /s/ CARRIE A. WOLFE          |   |
|   | Carrie A. Wolfe              |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   | /s/ CHRISTOPHER J.D. AINSLEY |   |
|   | Christopher J.D. Ainsley     |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   | /s/ HABIB Y. GORGI           |   |
|   | Habib Y. Gorgi               |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   | /s/ STEPHEN G. KASNET        |   |
|   | Stephen G. Kasnet            |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   | /s/ STEPHEN G. PAGLIUCA      |   |
|   | Stephen G. Pagliuca          |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   | /s/ RICHARD C. PERRY         |   |
|   | Richard C. Perry             |   |
|   |                         |   |
|   |                         |   |

 

 

----
#### Rachel L. VIDEON, etc., Petitioner, v. Ruth Louise COWART, Respondent.

No. 40644.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 23, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 241 So.2d 434.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.