29–006 

113TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 113–155 

FOIA OVERSIGHT AND IMPLEMENTATION ACT OF 2013 

JULY 16, 2013.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 

the Union and ordered to be printed 

Mr. ISSA, from the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform, submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H.R. 1211] 

[Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] 

The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, to whom 

was referred the bill (H.R. 1211) to amend section 552 of title 5, 

United States Code (commonly known as the Freedom of Information Act), to provide for greater public access to information, and 

for other purposes, having considered the same, report favorably 

thereon with amendments and recommend that the bill as amended do pass. 

CONTENTS 

Page 

Committee Statement and Views ........................................................................... 3 

Section-by-Section .................................................................................................... 7 

Explanation of Amendments ................................................................................... 8 

Committee Consideration ........................................................................................ 9 

Application of Law to the Legislative Branch ....................................................... 9 

Statement of Oversight Findings and Recommendations of the Committee ...... 9 

Statement of General Performance Goals and Objectives .................................... 9 

Duplication of Federal Programs ............................................................................ 9 

Disclosure of Directed Rule Makings ..................................................................... 10 

Federal Advisory Committee Act ............................................................................ 10 

Unfunded Mandate Statement ............................................................................... 10 

Earmark Identification ............................................................................................ 10 

Committee Estimate ................................................................................................ 10 

Budget Authority and Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate .................... 10 

Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill as Reported ...................................... 12 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
2 

The amendments (stated in terms of the page and line numbers 

of the introduced bill) are as follows: 

Page 2, line 5, insert ‘‘each place it appears’’ before the semicolon. 

Page 2, line 13, strike ‘‘proceeding’’ and insert ‘‘following’’. 

Page 3, line 5, insert ‘‘and’’ at the end. 

Page 3, strike line 6 and all that follows through line 8. 

Page 3, line 9, strike ‘‘(4)’’ and insert ‘‘(3)’’. 

Page 7, line 14, insert ‘‘of’’ after the opening quotation marks. 

Page 7, line 18, strike ‘‘new subclauses:’’ and insert ‘‘: ‘of—’ ’’. 

Page 10, line 14, strike ‘‘and’’. 

Page 10, line 17, strike the period, closing quotation marks, and 

the semicolon and insert ‘‘; and’’. 

Page 10, insert after line 17 the following: 

‘‘(S) the number of times the agency assessed a 

search or duplication fee under subsection (a)(4)(A) 

and did not comply with a time limit under subsection 

(a)(6).’’; 

Page 13, after line 15, insert the following new subsection (and 

redesignate subsequent subsections accordingly): 

(g) SEARCH OR DUPLICATION FEES.—Section 

552(a)(4)(A)(viii) of title 5, United States Code, is amended 

by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘Any 

agency that does assess search or duplication fees after 

failing to comply with a time limit under paragraph (6) 

shall provide written notice to the requester of the circumstance that justifies the fees. If an agency fails to provide such notice, the agency may not assess search or duplication fees.’’. 

Page 13, line 22, strike ‘‘the implementation’’ and insert ‘‘compliance with and implementation of the requirements’’. 

Page 13, line 23, strike ‘‘; and’’ and insert a semicolon. 

Page 14, strike lines 1 through 3, and insert the following: 

‘‘(2) catalog the number of exemptions under subsection (b)(3) and agency use of such exemptions; and 

‘‘(3) review and prepare a report on the processing 

of requests by agencies for information pertaining to 

an entity that has received assistance under title I of 

the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (12 

U.S.C. 5211 et seq.) during any period in which the 

Government owns or owned more than 50 percent of 

the stock of such entity.’’. 

At the end of the bill, add the following: 

SEC. 4. INSPECTOR GENERAL REVIEW; ADVERSE ACTIONS. 

(a) INSPECTOR GENERAL REVIEW.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Inspector General of each 

agency shall— 

(A) periodically review compliance with the requirements of section 552 of title 5, United States 

Code, including the timely processing of requests, 

assessment of fees and fee waivers, and the use of 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
3 

exemptions under subsection (b) of such section; 

and 

(B) make recommendations the Inspector General determines to be necessary to the head of the 

agency, including recommendations for disciplinary action. 

(2) AGENCY DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term 

‘‘agency’’ has the meaning given that term under section 552(f) of title 5, United States Code. 

(b) ADVERSE ACTIONS.—The withholding of information 

in a manner inconsistent with the requirements of section 

552 of title 5, United States Code (including any rules, regulations, or other implementing guidelines), as determined 

by the appropriate supervisor, shall be a basis for disciplinary action in accordance with subchapter I, II, or V of 

chapter 75 of such title, as the case may be. 

COMMITTEE STATEMENT AND VIEWS

PURPOSE AND SUMMARY

The purpose of H.R. 1211, the FOIA Oversight and Implementation Act of 2013, is to strengthen the Freedom of Information Act 

(FOIA) to increase transparency and accountability in government. 

It amends FOIA to provide for more proactive disclosure of records, 

encourages enhanced agency compliance, and improves the FOIA 

process for both agencies and requesters. 

H.R. 1211 increases the amount of agency information made 

available through proactive disclosure. Records requested under 

FOIA more than three times will be posted online for public inspection and copying. Each agency shall also review its records to determine whether any records ought to be released because they are 

in the public interest, and establish procedures for identifying categories of records that can be proactively disclosed to the public on 

a regular basis. These provisions will increase the amount of information the public can access without even filing a FOIA request. 

H.R. 1211 establishes a single website, accessible to the public at 

no cost, which will allow people to submit FOIA requests, file appeals, and receive automated information about the status of their 

requests in a single location. 

H.R. 1211 establishes a presumption of openness for agencies 

processing FOIA requests. Attorney General Eric Holder’s March 

2009 Memorandum to agencies directed them to disclose information whenever possible, and to not withhold information simply because it can be legally withheld under a FOIA exemption. H.R. 

1211 would codify the presumption of openness, making it a permanent requirement for agencies. 

H.R. 1211 strengthens the role of the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS), an entity created by the OPEN Government Act of 2007. OGIS acts as a FOIA ombudsman for agencies 

and requesters, and is also tasked with alternate dispute resolution 

to resolve FOIA cases. H.R. 1211 provides OGIS with direct reporting to Congress, without the need for interagency review. OGIS 

would also be tasked with increased review of compliance with 

FOIA, including the timely processing of requests, fees and fee 

waivers, and the use of exemptions. OGIS will submit an annual 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
4 

report to Congress on its review. It will also hold at least one public meeting per year to allow interested persons to appear and 

present oral or written statements. 

H.R. 1211 clarifies the right of any individual to appeal an agency’s determination regarding a FOIA request filed by that individual. The agency must give requesters at least 90 days to appeal 

an adverse determination. A time limit for appeals is not currently 

codified, so this provision will strengthen requester rights to file 

appeals. 

H.R. 1211 increases the amount of information reported by agencies in annual FOIA reports. The bill requires each agency to report how often it invoked law enforcement exclusions, how often it 

engaged in dispute resolution, how often it made information available to the public through proactive disclosure, and how often it assessed a search or duplication fee for a request when the agency 

did not comply with the statutory time limits for responding to that 

request. The reports would be sent to OGIS, as well as the Attorney General. Additionally, the raw data used by agencies to complete their annual FOIA reports will be made available online in 

a fully useable, bulk-downloadable and machine-readable format. 

The bill requires the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to 

conduct audits of agency compliance with FOIA. It will also catalog 

the number of exemptions under subsection (b)(3) of FOIA. GAO 

will also review and report on agency processing of FOIA requests 

seeking information about private entities that receive or received 

assistance under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 

during any period in which the government owned or owns more 

than 50 percent of the stock of such entity. 

H.R. 1211 increases the oversight responsibilities of agency Chief 

FOIA Officers, requiring each agency Chief FOIA Officer to annually review all aspects of FOIA compliance by the agency. The bill 

also establishes a Chief FOIA Officers Council, which shall be 

chaired by the Director of the Office of Information Policy at the 

Department of Justice, and the Director of OGIS. The Council is 

tasked with: developing recommendations to increase FOIA compliance and efficiency; sharing information on ideas, best practices, 

and innovative approaches to improve FOIA; identifying ways to 

better coordinate initiatives to increase transparency; and promoting the development and use of performance measures for agency FOIA compliance. The Council shall meet regularly, and will 

hold annual meetings that are open to the public at which interested persons are allowed to present oral and written statements. 

All Council records, except any records relating to national security, shall be made publicly available. 

Agencies must update their FOIA regulations no later than 180 

days after H.R. 1211 is enacted. Regulations must include procedures for engaging in dispute resolution and procedures for engaging with OGIS. The regulations shall be reviewed by OGIS to ensure they are compliant and consistent with current FOIA law. Any 

agency that fails to comply will have to submit a report to Congress 

to explain its noncompliance. Agencies that do not comply will also 

be reviewed by their Office of Inspector General to evaluate agency 

compliance with FOIA law. 

H.R. 1211 creates a pilot program to evaluate the use of a centralized FOIA portal to receive, process, and publicly disseminate 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
5 

1 Congressional Research Service, ‘‘FOIA: Background and Policy Options for the 113th Congress,’’ March 8, 2013. 2 U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, ‘‘A Citizen’s Guide on Using the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act of 1974 to Request 

Government Records,’’ September 2012. 3 Congressional Research Service, ‘‘FOIA: Background and Policy Options for the 113th Congress.’’ 

records in response to FOIA requests. The portal must allow people 

to submit FOIA requests to any participating agency in one location, and to track the processing of their requests. All records produced in response to requests are to be placed automatically online 

and be made available to the requester and the general public. The 

pilot requires three new agencies to participate in the FOIA portal, 

and to use it to track and process requests and post responsive 

records online. The pilot will last for three years. At the end of the 

pilot, the Office of Management and Budget will review the benefits of the FOIA portal, including cost and resource savings; increased efficiency, transparency, and accountability; and ability to 

complete annual FOIA reports. It will also assess any change in 

the amount of FOIA requests received. Each agency shall report to 

Congress on its experience using the FOIA portal and any related 

recommendations the agency considers appropriate. 

BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR LEGISLATION

FOIA was enacted in 1966, after eleven years of legislative development in the House of Representatives and almost six years of 

consideration in the Senate.1 At the time of enactment, FOIA was 

the third freedom of information law in the world, and by far the 

most comprehensive.2 It established an important precedent by giving the public a formal method to request and receive information 

from the government. 

FOIA establishes a presumption that records in the possession of 

Executive Branch agencies and departments of the U.S. Federal 

Government are accessible to the people. This presumption was not 

always the approach to federal information access policy. Before 

FOIA, those seeking information were required to show a need for 

information. FOIA replaced the ‘‘need to know’’ standard with a 

‘‘right to know.’’ As a result, FOIA is often referred to as the embodiment of ‘‘the people’s right to know’’ about the activities and 

operations of government. 

Under FOIA, anyone may file a request for a copy of any existing 

record at any federal agency for any reason. Information requested 

under FOIA is required to be released unless it falls under any of 

nine narrow exemptions to protect certain information from disclosure. Dispute over requests for information under FOIA may be appealed administratively, resolved through mediation, or litigated in 

court.3

Since its enactment, FOIA has been amended multiple times in 

efforts to increase agency compliance with the requirements of the 

act and improve the process. FOIA was amended in 1974, 1976, 

1986, 1996, 2007, and 2010. Despite these amendments, significant 

problems persist. H.R. 1211 helps to address many of these issues. 

One issue is the use of the nine statutory FOIA exemptions, 

which allow for the withholding of records to protect sensitive information from disclosure. There is concern that agencies are overusing exemptions to protect records that should be releasable under 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
6 

4See Note 2, Supra. 5Washington Examiner, ‘‘EPA Inspector General Investigating Claims Agency Used Fees to 

Block FOIA Requests,’’ May 16, 2013. See also: ‘‘Suit: Spy Agency Flouting FOIA,’’ Politico, February 22, 2012. 6 House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Testimony of Melanie Ann Pustay, 

Hearing on FOIA in the 21st Century: Using Technology to Improve Transparency in Government, March 21, 2012 (H. Rept. 112–140). 7Department of Justice, ‘‘Summary of Annual FOIA Reports for Fiscal Year 2011,’’ accessed 

May 5, 2013. 8Department of Justice, Office of Information Policy (previously Office of Information and Privacy), FOIA Post, ‘‘FOIA Counselor Q&A: ‘Frequently Requested’ Records,’’ accessed January 22, 

2013. 9P.L. 110–175. 

10The FOIA Project, ‘‘FOIA Lawsuits Increase During Obama Administration,’’ December 20, 

2012. 

law. In March 2009, Attorney General Eric Holder issued guidance 

stating that ‘‘an agency should not withhold information simply because it may do so legally,’’ and established a presumption of disclosure.4 Many agencies have failed to adopt this practice fully, and 

withhold information that could be released. 

Fees and fee waivers are another problem that requires further 

legislation. FOIA does not allow agencies to assess search fees if 

the agency does not comply with specific statutory time limits to 

respond to requesters. Additionally, many requesters qualify for a 

waiver of fees. Agencies have not fully complied with the statute. 

Some agencies charge excessive fees, or engage in fee assessment 

practices designed to dissuade requesters.5

The backlog of FOIA requests has increased in recent years, and 

has led to significant delays in the processing of requests. The 

number of FOIA requests rose from 597,415 in Fiscal Year 2010 to 

644,165 in Fiscal Year 2011, a 7.8 percent increase.6 During that 

same time frame, backlogs increased 20.8 percent. From FY 2010 

to FY 2011, the total backlog of FOIA requests increased from 

69,526 to 83,490.7 Agencies have made efforts to reduce FOIA 

backlogs, but they continue to be a consistent problem. 

Many agencies are failing to comply with FOIA requirements to 

make frequently requested records publicly available online. The 

Department of Justice issued guidance instructing agencies to release records that have been requested three or more times.8 The 

proactive disclosure of records in the public interest has been limited though. Proactive disclosure could reduce the number of FOIA 

requests, requiring less processing time for agencies. 

FOIA law encourages the use of alternate dispute resolution to 

avoid lawsuits whenever possible. Each agency has a FOIA Public 

Liaison, who is tasked with assisting ‘‘in the resolution of any disputes between the requester and the agency.’’ 9 The Office of Government Information Services was also created to offer mediation 

services and work to resolve disputes. Despite these actions, the 

number of FOIA lawsuits continues to rise.10

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY

H.R. 1211 was introduced on March 15, 2013, by Chairman Issa, 

with Ranking Member Cummings as an original cosponsor. 

On March 13, 2013, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held a hearing on FOIA and related issues entitled, 

‘‘Addressing Transparency in the Federal Bureaucracy: Moving Toward A More Open Government.’’ The Committee heard testimony 

from representatives of transparency watchdog groups, including 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
7 

Ms. Angela Canterbury, Director of Public Policy, Project on Government Oversight; Mr. Jim Harper, Director of Information Policy 

Studies, Cato Institute; Mr. Daniel Schuman, Policy Counsel, The 

Sunlight Foundation; and Ms. Celia Wexler, Senior Washington 

Representative, Center for Science and Democracy, Union of Concerned Scientists. 

On March 20, 2013, the Committee considered H.R. 1211. 

Amendments offered by Reps. Duckworth, Turner, and Mica were 

agreed to by voice vote. H.R. 1211, as amended, was then adopted 

by voice vote and ordered reported favorably to the House. 

SECTION-BY-SECTION

Section 1. Short title 

This section is the short title of the bill, ‘‘FOIA Oversight and 

Implementation Act of 2013,’’ or the ‘‘FOIA Act.’’ 

Section 2. Freedom of Information Act Amendments 

This section amends FOIA by— 

(1) Increasing electronic accessibility by requiring agencies to 

post more information online in publicly accessible formats. Agencies will post information requested three or more times online in 

a publicly accessible format, as well as other records that would 

contribute to public interest. Annual reports and the raw data of 

the reports will also be publicly accessible without request, and 

there will be a single website for the public to submit FOIA requests and receive information about the status of requests. 

(2) Putting into statute President Obama’s and Attorney General 

Holder’s memorandums requiring agencies to adopt a presumption 

of openness when responding to requests. Under the Act, agencies 

may only withhold information if the disclosure of such records 

could cause foreseeable harm. It places the burden on agencies to 

demonstrate why information may be withheld, instead of on the 

public to justify release. The FOIA Act also puts into statute the 

President’s recommendation to utilize technology to increase transparency and evaluate records to determine whether they should be 

publicly available. 

(3) Strengthening the Office of Government Information Services 

(OGIS) by giving it increased independence. OGIS shall report directly to Congress without interagency review. It will review agency compliance with all aspects of FOIA, and report recommendations. OGIS will also hold public meetings at least once a year. 

(4) Requiring agencies to report more information in annual reports. Agencies would for the first time have to report the number 

of times they invoked law enforcement exclusions, engaged in dispute resolution, and the number of records made publicly available. 

Annual reports would be completed by March 1 of each year instead of April 1. 

(5) Requiring the Government Accountability Office to catalog all 

uses of (b)(3) exemptions, which are FOIA exemptions created by 

other statutes. Currently, it is unknown how many (b)(3) exemptions exist. 

(6) Increasing responsibilities for OGIS, DOJ, and Chief FOIA 

Officers to review FOIA compliance and make recommendations. 

DOJ will have to report more information about FOIA lawsuits. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
8 

OGIS and Chief FOIA Officers will both review FOIA compliance 

and make recommendations to improve the process. 

(7) Creating a Chief FOIA Officers Council, based on the CIO 

Council. It shall be run jointly by OGIS and DOJ’s Office of Information Policy as co-chairs. All agency Chief FOIA Officers shall be 

members of the Council. The Council will meet regularly to review 

FOIA compliance and discuss improvements. Records of the meetings shall be publicly available, and all meetings shall be noticed 

in the Federal Register beforehand. No less than once a year, the 

Council shall have a public meeting where interested persons may 

submit statements in writing or in person. 

(8) Requiring each agency to update its FOIA regulations within 

180 days of enactment. The regulations shall include procedures on 

dispute resolution and working with OGIS. OGIS will review 

whether agencies comply with this, and if agencies fail to update 

their regulations they will have to report to Congress on their failure to do so and will be subject to a review of their FOIA compliance by their Office of Inspector General. 

Section 3. Pilot program 

The section establishes a pilot program to review FOIAonline, 

the public portal that allows requesters to submit and review requests for multiple agencies at a single location. The pilot program 

will last for three years and will require three additional agencies 

to use FOIAonline to process FOIA requests and make records 

available online. At the end of the pilot, agencies are to report to 

Congress on the results of the program and make recommendations 

as to whether it will continue to use FOIAonline. 

Section 4. Inspector General review; Adverse actions 

This section requires the Inspector General of each agency to periodically review agency compliance with the requirements of 

FOIA, including timely processing of requests, assessments of fees 

and fee waivers, and the use of exemptions, and to make any necessary recommendations to the agency head to improve the process. 

Recommendations may include disciplinary action. Additionally, 

the amendment would make the withholding of information in a 

manner inconsistent with FOIA a basis for disciplinary action. 

EXPLANATION OF AMENDMENTS

Amendment offered by Ms. Duckworth 

Ms. Duckworth’s amendment requires agencies to report the 

number of times they assessed a search or duplication fee for a 

FOIA request when the agency failed to comply with FOIA request 

response deadlines. This information would be included in agencies’ 

annual FOIA reports. The amendment would also require agencies 

to notify a requester if the requester was assessed search or duplication fees after the agency failed to comply with time limits under 

FOIA, and inform the requester of the circumstances that would 

justify the fees. If an agency fails to inform the requester, it may 

not collect fees. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
9 

Amendment offered by Mr. Mica 

Mr. Mica’s amendment added a section to the end of the bill that 

tasks the Inspector General of each agency with periodically reviewing agency compliance with the requirements of FOIA and 

making any necessary recommendations to the agency head to improve the process—recommendations may include disciplinary action. Additionally, the amendment would make the withholding of 

information in a manner inconsistent with FOIA a basis for disciplinary action. 

Amendment offered by Mr. Turner 

Mr. Turner’s amendment requires the Government Accountability Office to report on agencies’ processing of FOIA requests 

seeking information about entities that are owned or have been 

owned by the government. Specifically, the report would review requests for information on entities that have received assistance 

under title I of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 

(12 U.S.C. 5211 et seq.) during any period the Government owned 

more than 50 percent of the stock of the entity. This would cover 

Government sponsored enterprises and would shed light on FOIA 

policy pertaining to these entities. 

COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION

On March 20, 2013, the Committee met in open session and ordered reported favorably the bill, H.R. 1211, as amended, by voice 

vote, a quorum being present. 

APPLICATION OF LAW TO THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

Section 102(b)(3) of Public Law 104–1 requires a description of 

the application of this bill to the legislative branch where the bill 

relates to the terms and conditions of employment or access to public services and accommodations. This bill provides for more 

proactive disclosure of records, encourages enhanced agency compliance, and improves the FOIA process for both agencies and requesters. Legislative branch employees and their families, to the 

extent that they are otherwise eligible for the benefits provided by 

this legislation, have equal access to its benefits. 

STATEMENT OF OVERSIGHT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

THE COMMITTEE

In compliance with clause 3(c)(1) of rule XIII and clause 2(b)(1) 

of rule X of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee’s oversight findings and recommendations are reflected in the 

descriptive portions of this report. 

STATEMENT OF GENERAL PERFORMANCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

In accordance with clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 

House of Representatives, the Committee’s performance goals and 

objectives are reflected in the descriptive portions of this report. 

DUPLICATION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS

No provision of H.R. 1211 establishes or reauthorizes a program 

of the Federal Government known to be duplicative of another FedVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:42 Jul 19, 2013 Jkt 029006 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR155.XXX HR155

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
10 

eral program, a program that was included in any report from the 

Government Accountability Office to Congress pursuant to section 

21 of Public Law 111–139, or a program related to a program identified in the most recent Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. 

DISCLOSURE OF DIRECTED RULE MAKINGS

The FOIA Oversight and Implementation Act will require agencies to promulgate new regulations on procedures for processing requests under FOIA. Agencies are already required to have regulations on FOIA, but this Act will ensure these regulations are current. Agencies will specifically have to create new regulations on 

interactions with the Office of Government Information Services, 

and procedures used for dispute resolution services. 

FEDERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ACT

The Committee finds that the legislation does not establish or 

authorize the establishment of an advisory committee within the 

definition of 5 U.S.C. App., Section 5(b). 

UNFUNDED MANDATE STATEMENT

Section 423 of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act (as amended by Section 101(a)(2) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, P.L. 104–4) requires a statement as to whether 

the provisions of the reported include unfunded mandates. In compliance with this requirement the Committee has received a letter 

from the Congressional Budget Office included herein. 

EARMARK IDENTIFICATION

H.R. 1211 does not include any congressional earmarks, limited 

tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as defined in clause 9 of rule 

XXI. 

COMMITTEE ESTIMATE

Clause 3(d)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives requires an estimate and a comparison by the Committee of the costs that would be incurred in carrying out H.R. 

1211. However, clause 3(d)(3)(B) of that rule provides that this requirement does not apply when the Committee has included in its 

report a timely submitted cost estimate of the bill prepared by the 

Director of the Congressional Budget Office under section 402 of 

the Congressional Budget Act. 

BUDGET AUTHORITY AND CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE COST

ESTIMATE

With respect to the requirements of clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of 

the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 308(a) of the 

Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and with respect to requirements 

of clause 3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the 

Committee has received the following cost estimate for H.R. 1211 

from the Director of Congressional Budget Office: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
11 

MAY 21, 2013. 

Hon. DARRELL ISSA, 

Chairman, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, 

House of Representatives, Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: The Congressional Budget Office has prepared the enclosed cost estimate for H.R. 1211, the FOIA Act. 

If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased 

to provide them. The CBO staff contact for this estimate is Matthew Pickford. 

Sincerely, 

DOUGLAS W. ELMENDORF. 

Enclosure. 

H.R. 1211—FOIA Act 

Summary: H.R. 1211 would amend the Freedom of Information 

Act (FOIA). FOIA generally allows any person to obtain federal 

agency records. Specifically, the legislation would require the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) to establish a single FOIA 

website for making requests and checking on the status of those requests; establish a Chief FOIA Officers Council to review compliance with the act and to recommend improvements; and require 

additional reports from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) and other agencies. 

CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 1211 would cost $20 million over the 2014–2018 period, assuming appropriation of the necessary amounts. The legislation also could affect direct spending by 

agencies not funded through annual appropriations (such as the 

Tennessee Valley Authority). Therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures 

apply. CBO estimates, however, that any net increase in spending 

by those agencies would not be significant. Enacting the bill would 

not affect revenues. 

H.R. 1211 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) 

and would not affect the budgets of state, local, or tribal governments. 

Estimated cost to the Federal Government: The estimated budgetary impact of H.R. 1211 is shown in the following table. The costs 

of this legislation fall within all budget functions that contain salaries and expenses. 

By fiscal year, in millions of dollars— 

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2014– 

2018 

CHANGES IN SPENDING SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION 

Estimated Authorization Level ............................................................................ 5 5 4 4 4 22 

Estimated Outlays .............................................................................................. 4 4 4 4 4 20 

Basis of the estimate: For this estimate, CBO assumes that the 

bill will be enacted by the end of fiscal year 2013, that the necessary amounts will be appropriated for each year, and that spending will follow historical patterns for FOIA activities. 

Enacted in 1966, FOIA was designed to enable anyone to request, without explanation or justification, copies of existing, identifiable, and unpublished records from the executive branch. OMB 

issues guidelines to agencies on fees to charge for providing reVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:42 Jul 19, 2013 Jkt 029006 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR155.XXX HR155

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
12 

quested information, while DOJ oversees agency compliance with 

FOIA. In 2012, federal agencies (excluding the Social Security Administration) received more than 650,000 FOIA requests. In addition, DOJ reports that in fiscal year 2012, agencies employed about 

4,400 full-time staff to fulfill FOIA requests and spent around $485 

million on FOIA-related activities. 

CBO expects that OMB would expand the use of existing 

websites that are currently used to fulfill FOIA requests. A governmentwide website (FOIA.gov) is operated by the Department of 

Justice, and FOIAonline.gov is a Web application operated by the 

Environmental Protection Agency that allows the public to track 

and search some FOIA requests. Nonetheless, CBO anticipates that 

the workloads of most agencies would increase to carry out the 

bill’s new reporting requirements. We also estimate that NARA 

would face additional costs to arrange for a new annual meeting 

and to establish a Chief FOIA Officers Council to review and improve the FOIA process. Based on the costs of similar electronic filing systems and websites and a review of the annual reports by 15 

major agencies over the last five years, CBO estimates that implementing H.R. 1211 would add about 1 percent—around $5 million 

annually—to the governmentwide costs of administering FOIA. 

Pay-As-You-Go considerations: The Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act 

of 2010 establishes budget-reporting and enforcement procedures 

for legislation affecting direct spending or revenues. Enacting H.R. 

1211 could affect net direct spending for agencies not funded 

through the appropriations process, but CBO estimates that such 

effects would not be significant in any year. 

Intergovernmental and private-sector impact: H.R. 1211 contains 

no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in 

UMRA and would not affect the budgets of state, local, or tribal 

governments. 

Estimate prepared by: Federal costs: Matthew Pickford; Impact 

on state, local, and tribal governments: Elizabeth Cove Delisle; Impact on private sector: Paige Piper/Bach. 

Estimate approved by: Theresa Gullo, Deputy Assistant Director 

for Budget Analysis. 

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED

In compliance with clause 3(e) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 

House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by the bill, 

as reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new matter is printed in italic, 

existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman): 

TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE 

* * * * * * * 

PART I—THE AGENCIES GENERALLY 

* * * * * * * 

CHAPTER 5—ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE 

* * * * * * * 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
13 

SUBCHAPTER II—ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE 

* * * * * * * 

§ 552. Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, 

records, and proceedings 

(a) Each agency shall make available to the public information 

as follows: 

(1) * * * 

(2) Each agency, in accordance with published rules, shall 

make available øfor public inspection and copying¿ in an electronic, publicly accessible format— 

(A) * * * 

* * * * * * * 

ø(E) a general index of the records referred to under 

subparagraph (D);¿ 

(E) copies of all records, regardless of form or format, 

that have been released three or more times under paragraph (3); and 

(F) a general index of the records referred to under subparagraphs (D) and (E); 

unless the materials are promptly published and copies offered for 

sale. For records created on or after November 1, 1996, within one 

year after such date, each agency shall make such records available, including by computer telecommunications or, if computer 

telecommunications means have not been established by the agency, by other electronic means. To the extent required to prevent a 

clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, an agency may 

delete identifying details when it makes available or publishes an 

opinion, statement of policy, interpretation, staff manual, instruction, or copies of records referred to in øsubparagraph (D)¿ subparagraphs (D) and (E). However, in each case the justification for 

the deletion shall be explained fully in writing, and the extent of 

such deletion shall be indicated on the portion of the record which 

is made available or published, unless including that indication 

would harm an interest protected by the exemption in subsection 

(b) under which the deletion is made. If technically feasible, the extent of the deletion shall be indicated at the place in the record 

where the deletion was made. Each agency shall also maintain and 

make available øfor public inspection and copying¿ in an electronic, 

publicly accessible format current indexes providing identifying information for the public as to any matter issued, adopted, or promulgated after July 4, 1967, and required by this paragraph to be 

made available or published. Each agency shall promptly publish, 

quarterly or more frequently, and distribute (by sale or otherwise) 

copies of each index or supplements thereto unless it determines by 

order published in the Federal Register that the publication would 

be unnecessary and impracticable, in which case the agency shall 

nonetheless provide copies of such index on request at a cost not 

to exceed the direct cost of duplication. Each agency shall make the 

index referred to in øsubparagraph (E)¿ subparagraph (F) available 

by computer telecommunications by December 31, 1999. A final 

order, opinion, statement of policy, interpretation, or staff manual 

or instruction that affects a member of the public may be relied on, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
14 

used, or cited as precedent by an agency against a party other than 

an agency only if— 

(i) * * * 

* * * * * * * 

(4)(A)(i) In order to carry out the provisions of this section, each 

agency shall promulgate regulations, pursuant to notice and receipt 

of public comment, specifying the schedule of fees applicable to the 

processing of requests under this section and establishing procedures and guidelines for determining when such fees should be 

waived or reduced. Such schedule shall conform to the guidelines 

which shall be promulgated, pursuant to notice and receipt of public comment, by øthe Director of the Office of Management and 

Budget¿ the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in 

consultation with the Director of the Office of Government Information Services, and which shall provide for a uniform schedule of 

fees for all agencies. 

* * * * * * * 

(viii) An agency shall not assess search fees (or in the case of a 

requester described under clause (ii)(II), duplication fees) under 

this subparagraph if the agency fails to comply with any time limit 

under paragraph (6), if no unusual or exceptional circumstances (as 

those terms are defined for purposes of paragraphs (6)(B) and (C), 

respectively) apply to the processing of the request. Any agency 

that does assess search or duplication fees after failing to comply 

with a time limit under paragraph (6) shall provide written notice 

to the requester of the circumstance that justifies the fees. If an 

agency fails to provide such notice, the agency may not assess search 

or duplication fees. 

* * * * * * * 

(6)(A) Each agency, upon any request for records made under 

paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of this subsection, shall— 

(i) determine within 20 days (excepting Saturdays, Sundays, 

and legal public holidays) after the receipt of any such request 

whether to comply with such request and shall immediately 

notify the person making such request øof such determination 

and the reasons therefor, and of the right of such person to appeal to the head of the agency any adverse determination; 

and:¿of— 

(I) such determination and the reasons therefor; 

(II) the right of such person to seek assistance from the 

agency FOIA Public Liaison; and 

(III) the right of such person to appeal to the head of the 

agency any adverse determination, not later than 90 days 

after the receipt of such adverse determination; and 

(ii) make a determination with respect to any appeal within 

twenty days (excepting Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public 

holidays) after the receipt of such appealø.¿ and the right of 

such person to seek dispute resolution services from the agency 

FOIA Public Liaison or the Office of Government Information 

Services. If on appeal the denial of the request for records is 

in whole or in part upheld, the agency shall notify the person 

making such request of the provisions for judicial review of 

that determination under paragraph (4) of this subsection. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
15 

The 20-day period under clause (i) shall commence on the date on 

which the request is first received by the appropriate component of 

the agency, but in any event not later than ten days after the request is first received by any component of the agency that is designated in the agency’s regulations under this section to receive requests under this section. The 20-day period shall not be tolled by 

the agency except— 

(I) * * * 

* * * * * * * 

(7) Each agency shall— 

(A) establish a system to assign an individualized tracking number for each request received øthat will take 

longer than ten days to process¿ and provide to each person making a request the tracking number assigned to the 

request; and 

(B) establish a telephone line or Internet service that 

provides automated information about the status of a request to the person making the request using the assigned 

tracking number, including— 

(i) * * * 

* * * * * * * 

(8) DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION FOR INCREASED PUBLIC UN- DERSTANDING OF THE GOVERNMENT.—Each agency shall— 

(A) review the records of such agency to determine whether the release of the records would be in the public interest 

because it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the Government; 

(B) for records determined to be in the public interest 

under subparagraph (A), reasonably segregate and redact 

any information exempted from disclosure under subsection 

(b); and 

(C) make available in an electronic, publicly accessible 

format, any records identified in subparagraph (A), as 

modified pursuant to subparagraph (B). 

(9) INCREASED DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION.—Each agency 

shall— 

(A) make information public to the greatest extent possible through modern technology to— 

(i) inform the public of the operations and activities 

of the Government; and 

(ii) ensure timely disclosure of information; and 

(B) establish procedures for identifying categories of 

records that may be disclosed regularly and additional 

records of interest to the public that are appropriate for 

public disclosure, and for posting such records in an electronic, publicly accessible format. 

(b) This section does not apply to matters that would cause foreseeable harm and that are— 

(1) * * * 

* * * * * * * 

(e)(1) On or before February 1 of each year, each agency shall 

submit to the Attorney General of the United States and to the DiVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:42 Jul 19, 2013 Jkt 029006 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6601 E:\HR\OC\HR155.XXX HR155

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
16 

rector of the Office of Government Information Services a report 

which shall cover the preceding fiscal year and which shall include— 

(A) * * * 

* * * * * * * 

(N) the total amount of fees collected by the agency for processing requestsø; and¿; 

(O) the number of full-time staff of the agency devoted to 

processing requests for records under this section, and the total 

amount expended by the agency for processing such 

requestsø.¿; 

(P) the number of times the agency invoked a law enforcement 

exclusion under subsection (c); 

(Q) the number of times the agency engaged in dispute resolution with the assistance of the Office of Government Information 

Services or the FOIA Public Liaison; 

(R) the number of records that were made available in an 

electronic, publicly accessible format under subsection (a)(2); 

and 

(S) the number of times the agency assessed a search or duplication fee under subsection (a)(4)(A) and did not comply with 

a time limit under subsection (a)(6). 

* * * * * * * 

ø(3) Each agency shall make each such report available to the 

public including by computer telecommunications, or if computer 

telecommunications means have not been established by the agency, by other electronic means. In addition, each agency shall make 

the raw statistical data used in its reports available electronically 

to the public upon request.¿ 

(3) ELECTRONIC ACCESSIBILITY OF REPORTS.—Each agency shall 

make each such report available in an electronic, publicly accessible 

format. In addition, each agency shall make the raw statistical data 

used in its reports available in a timely manner in an electronic, 

publicly accessible format. Such data shall be— 

(A) made available without charge, license, or registration requirement; 

(B) capable of being searched and aggregated; and 

(C) permitted to be downloaded and downloaded in bulk. 

(4) The Attorney General of the United States shall make each 

report which has been made available by electronic means available at a single electronic access point. The Attorney General of the 

United States shall notify the Chairman and ranking minority 

member of the øCommittee on Government Reform and Oversight¿ 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of 

Representatives and the Chairman and ranking minority member 

of the Committees on øGovernmental Affairs¿ Homeland Security 

and Governmental Affairs and the Judiciary of the Senate, no later 

than øApril 1¿ March 1 of the year in which each such report is 

issued, that such reports are available by electronic means. 

(5) The Attorney General of the United States, in consultation 

with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the 

Director of the Office of Government Information Services, shall develop reporting and performance guidelines in connection with reports required by this subsection øby October 1, 1997¿, and may 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
17 

establish additional requirements for such reports as the Attorney 

General determines may be useful. 

ø(6) The Attorney General of the United States shall submit an 

annual report on or before April 1 of each calendar year which 

shall include for the prior calendar year a listing of the number of 

cases arising under this section, the exemption involved in each 

case, the disposition of such case, and the cost, fees, and penalties 

assessed under subparagraphs (E), (F), and (G) of subsection (a)(4). 

Such report shall also include a description of the efforts undertaken by the Department of Justice to encourage agency compliance with this section.¿ 

(6) ATTORNEY GENERAL FOIA REPORT.— (A) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General of the United States 

shall submit to Congress and the President an annual report on 

or before March 1 of each calendar year which shall include for 

the prior calendar year— 

(i) a listing of the number of cases arising under this section; 

(ii) each subsection under this section, each paragraph of 

the subsection, and any exemption, if applicable, involved 

in each case, the disposition of such case, and the cost, fees, 

and penalties assessed under subparagraphs (E), (F), and 

(G) of subsection (a)(4); and 

(iii) a description of the efforts undertaken by the Department of Justice to encourage agency compliance with this 

section. 

(B) ELECTRONIC AVAILABILITY.—The Attorney General of the 

United States— 

(i) shall make each report described under subparagraph 

(A) available in an electronic, publicly accessible format; 

and 

(ii) shall make the raw statistical data used in each report available in an electronic, publicly accessible format, 

which shall be— 

(I) made available without charge, license, or registration requirement; 

(II) capable of being searched and aggregated; and 

(III) permitted to be downloaded, including 

downloaded in bulk. 

* * * * * * * 

(g) The head of each agency shall prepare and ømake publicly 

available upon request¿ make available in an electronic, publicly 

accessible format, reference material or a guide for requesting 

records or information from the agency, subject to the exemptions 

in subsection (b), including— 

(1) * * * 

* * * * * * * 

ø(h)(1) There is established the Office of Government Information 

Services within the National Archives and Records Administration. 

ø(2) The Office of Government Information Services shall— 

ø(A) review policies and procedures of administrative agencies under this section; 

ø(B) review compliance with this section by administrative 

agencies; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
18 

ø(C) recommend policy changes to Congress and the President to improve the administration of this section. 

ø(3) The Office of Government Information Services shall offer 

mediation services to resolve disputes between persons making requests under this section and administrative agencies as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation and, at the discretion of the Office, 

may issue advisory opinions if mediation has not resolved the dispute. 

ø(i) The Government Accountability Office shall conduct audits of 

administrative agencies on the implementation of this section and 

issue reports detailing the results of such audits. 

ø(j) Each agency shall designate a Chief FOIA Officer who shall 

be a senior official of such agency (at the Assistant Secretary or 

equivalent level). 

ø(k) The Chief FOIA Officer of each agency shall, subject to the 

authority of the head of the agency— 

ø(1) have agency-wide responsibility for efficient and appropriate compliance with this section; 

ø(2) monitor implementation of this section throughout the 

agency and keep the head of the agency, the chief legal officer 

of the agency, and the Attorney General appropriately informed of the agency’s performance in implementing this section; 

ø(3) recommend to the head of the agency such adjustments 

to agency practices, policies, personnel, and funding as may be 

necessary to improve its implementation of this section; 

ø(4) review and report to the Attorney General, through the 

head of the agency, at such times and in such formats as the 

Attorney General may direct, on the agency’s performance in 

implementing this section; 

ø(5) facilitate public understanding of the purposes of the 

statutory exemptions of this section by including concise descriptions of the exemptions in both the agency’s handbook 

issued under subsection (g), and the agency’s annual report on 

this section, and by providing an overview, where appropriate, 

of certain general categories of agency records to which those 

exemptions apply; and 

ø(6) designate one or more FOIA Public Liaisons.¿ 

(h) THE OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT INFORMATION SERVICES.— 

(1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established the Office of Government Information Services within the National Archives and 

Records Administration. The head of the Office is the Director 

of the Office of Government Information Services. 

(2) REVIEW OF FOIA POLICY, PROCEDURE, AND COMPLIANCE.— 

The Office of Government Information Services shall— 

(A) review policies and procedures of agencies under this 

section; 

(B) review compliance with this section by agencies; and 

(C) identify methods that improve compliance under this 

section that may include— 

(i) the timely processing of requests submitted to 

agencies under this section; 

(ii) the system for assessing fees and fee waivers 

under this section; and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
19 

(iii) the use of any exemption under subsection (b); 

and 

(D) review and provide guidance to agencies on the use 

of fees and fee waivers. 

(3) MEDIATION SERVICES.—The Office of Government Information Services shall offer mediation services to resolve disputes between persons making requests under this section and 

agencies as a non-exclusive alternative to litigation and, at the 

discretion of the Office, may issue advisory opinions if mediation has not resolved the dispute. 

(4) SUBMISSION OF REPORT.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—The Office of Government Information 

Services shall not less than annually submit to the committees described in subparagraph (C) and the President a report on the findings from the information reviewed and 

identified under paragraph (2) and legislative and regulatory recommendations to improve the administration of 

this section. 

(B) ELECTRONIC AVAILABILITY OF REPORTS.—The Office 

shall make available any report submitted under paragraph (A) in a publicly accessible format. 

(C) CONGRESSIONAL SUBMISSION OF REPORT.—The committees described in this subparagraph are the following: 

(i) The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives. 

(ii) The Committees on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the Judiciary of the Senate. 

(D) DIRECT SUBMISSION OF REPORT.—Any report submitted under paragraph (A) shall be submitted directly to 

the committees and the President, without any requirement 

that any officer or employee outside of the Office of Government Information Services, including the Archivist of the 

United States and the Director of the Office of Management 

and Budget, review such report. 

(5) SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.—The Director 

of the Office of Government Information Services may submit 

additional information to Congress and the President that the 

Director determines to be appropriate. 

(6) ANNUAL MEETING REQUIRED.—Not less than once a year, 

the Office of Government Information Services shall hold a 

meeting that is open to the public on the review and reports by 

the Office and permit interested persons to appear and present 

oral or written statements at such meeting. 

(i) GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE.—The Government Accountability Office shall— 

(1) conduct audits of administrative agencies on compliance 

with and implementation of the requirements of this section 

and issue reports detailing the results of such audits; 

(2) catalog the number of exemptions under subsection (b)(3) 

and agency use of such exemptions; and 

(3) review and prepare a report on the processing of requests 

by agencies for information pertaining to an entity that has received assistance under title I of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (12 U.S.C. 5211 et seq.) during any peVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:42 Jul 19, 2013 Jkt 029006 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR155.XXX HR155

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
20 

riod in which the Government owns or owned more than 50 percent of the stock of such entity. 

(j) CHIEF FOIA OFFICER.— (1) DESIGNATION.—Each agency shall designate a Chief FOIA 

Officer who shall be a senior official of such agency (at the Assistant Secretary or equivalent level). 

(2) DUTIES.—The Chief FOIA Officer of each agency shall, 

subject to the authority of the head of the agency— 

(A) have agency-wide responsibility for efficient and appropriate compliance with this section; 

(B) monitor implementation of this section throughout the 

agency and keep the head of the agency, the chief legal officer of the agency, and the Attorney General appropriately 

informed of the agency’s performance in implementing this 

section; 

(C) recommend to the head of the agency such adjustments to agency practices, policies, personnel, and funding 

as may be necessary to improve its implementation of this 

section; 

(D) review and report to the Attorney General, through 

the head of the agency, at such times and in such formats 

as the Attorney General may direct, on the agency’s performance in implementing this section; 

(E) facilitate public understanding of the purposes of the 

statutory exemptions of this section by including concise descriptions of the exemptions in both the agency’s handbook 

issued under subsection (g), and the agency’s annual report 

on this section, and by providing an overview, where appropriate, of certain general categories of agency records to 

which those exemptions apply; and 

(F) designate one or more FOIA Public Liaisons. 

(3) COMPLIANCE REVIEW REQUIRED.—The Chief FOIA Officer 

of each agency shall— 

(A) review, not less than annually, all aspects of the 

agency’s administration of this section to ensure compliance 

with the requirements of this section, including— 

(i) agency regulations; 

(ii) disclosure of records required under paragraphs 

(2), (8), and (9) of subsection (a); 

(iii) assessment of fees and determination of eligibility for fee waivers; 

(iv) the timely processing of requests for information 

under this section; 

(v) the use of exemptions under subsection (b); and 

(vi) dispute resolution services with the assistance of 

the Office of Government Information Services or the 

FOIA Public Liaison; and 

(B) make recommendations as necessary to improve agency practices and compliance with this section. 

(k) CHIEF FOIA OFFICERS COUNCIL.— (1) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established in the executive 

branch the Chief FOIA Officers Council (in this subsection, referred to as the ‘‘Council’’). 

(2) MEMBERS.—The Council shall consist of the following 

members: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
21 

(A) The Deputy Director for Management of the Office of 

Management and Budget. 

(B) The Director of the Office of Information Policy at the 

Department of Justice. 

(C) The Director of the Office of Government Information 

Services at the National Archives and Records Administration. 

(D) The Chief FOIA Officer of each agency. 

(E) Any other officer or employee of the United States as 

designated by the Co-Chairs. 

(3) CO-CHAIRS.—The Director of the Office of Information Policy at the Department of Justice and the Director of the Office 

of Government Information Services at the National Archives 

and Records Administration shall be the Co-Chairs of the 

Council. 

(4) SUPPORT SERVICES.—The Administrator of General Services shall provide administrative and other support for the 

Council. 

(5) CONSULTATION.—In performing its duties, the Council 

shall consult regularly with members of the public who make 

requests under this section. 

(6) DUTIES.—The duties of the Council include the following: 

(A) Develop recommendations for increasing compliance 

and efficiency under this section. 

(B) Disseminate information about agency experiences, 

ideas, best practices, and innovative approaches related to 

this section. 

(C) Identify, develop, and coordinate initiatives to increase transparency and compliance with this section. 

(D) Promote the development and use of common performance measures for agency compliance with this section. 

(7) MEETINGS.— 

(A) REGULAR MEETINGS.—The Council shall meet regularly and such meetings shall be open to the public unless 

the Council determines to close the meeting for reasons of 

national security or to discuss information exempt under 

subsection (b). 

(B) ANNUAL MEETINGS.—Not less than once a year, the 

Council shall hold a meeting that shall be open to the public and permit interested persons to appear and present 

oral and written statements to the Council. 

(C) NOTICE.—Not later than 10 business days before a 

meeting of the Council, notice of such meeting shall be published in the Federal Register. 

(D) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF COUNCIL RECORDS.—Except 

as provided in subsection (b), the records, reports, transcripts, minutes, appendixes, working papers, drafts, studies, agenda, or other documents that were made available 

to or prepared for or by the Council shall be made publicly 

available. 

(E) MINUTES.—Detailed minutes of each meeting of the 

Council shall be kept and shall contain a record of the persons present, a complete and accurate description of matVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:42 Jul 19, 2013 Jkt 029006 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6603 E:\HR\OC\HR155.XXX HR155

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS
22 

ters discussed and conclusions reached, and copies of all reports received, issued, or approved by the Council. 

* * * * * * * 

(m) FOIA WEB SITE REQUIRED.—Not later than one year after the 

date of enactment of this subsection, the Office of Management and 

Budget shall ensure the existence and operation of a single Web site, 

accessible by the public at no cost to access, that allows the public 

to— 

(1) submit requests for records under subsection (a)(3); and 

(2) receive automated information about the status of a request under subsection (a)(7). 

* * * * * * * 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS