alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 188 (Monday, September 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25693]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-39109; File No. 265-19]


Consumer Affairs Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting of the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') Consumer Affairs Advisory Committee (``Commission'').

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission's Consumer Affairs 
Advisory Committee will meet on Tuesday, October 14, 1997, in Room 1C30 
at the Commission's Headquarters, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, 
D.C., beginning at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will be open to the public. 
This notice also serves to invite the public to submit written comments 
to the Committee.

ADDRESSES: You should submit written comments in triplicate and refer 
to File No. 265-19. Send your comments to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, 
Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20549.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Geraldine M. Walsh, Special Counsel to the Director, Office of Investor 
Education and Assistance, (202) 942-7040; Securities and Exchange 
Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 10a, requires the Securities and Exchange 
Commission to give notice that the Consumer Affairs Advisory Committee 
will meet on October 14, 1997, in Room 1C30 at the Commission's 
Headquarters, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., beginning at 
9:30 a.m. The meeting will be open to the public.
    The Committee's responsibilities include assisting the Commission 
in identifying investor problems and being more responsive to their 
needs. The Committee will explore fundamental issues of concern to 
investors, including matters currently under consideration by the 
Commission and topics of emerging concern to investors and the 
financial services industry.

    Dated: September 22, 1997.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-25693 Filed 9-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
#### Kenneth Bernard MOFFETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-634.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 12, 1970.

F. Hartselle Baker, of Robertson & Williams, Orlando, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Rodney Durrance, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*149PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. New Jersey, 1966, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882; Odom v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 377 F.2d 853 and Moffett v. State, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 408.

CROSS, C. J., and WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2 - Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Communications of America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the "Report").

I, David R. Pressler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ David R. Pressler
--------------------------
    David R. Pressler
    CEO President and Director


Date  April 25, 2011
      -----------------
No. 00-804.

#### Osborne, Administratrix of the Estate of Osborne, Deceased *v.*Cambridge Township.

Commw. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
               SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the quarterly report of Twinview, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Patrick K.
Hogle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John S. Girvan, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as
adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of our knowledge and belief:

     (1)    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




                        _/s/ Patrick K. Hogle
                        ------------------------
                        Patrick K. Hogle
                        Chief Executive officer
                        Date:  August 14, 2002



                        _/s/ John S. Girvan________________________
                        John S. Girvan
Chief Financial Officer
                        Date:  August 14, 2002
(1)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
Chamley, Christophe P. Rational Herds: Economic M odels of Social Learning . Cambridge

University Press, November 2003 (ISBN-10:052153092X ; ISBN013:978-0521530927).

This book is available through interlibrary loan at many libraries and is available for purchase at sites such as Amazon.com and Barnes and Noble.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.38


                         EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ADDENDUM


                                        
THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ADDENDUM,  is a supplement to the original EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT dated JANUARY 1, 1995, by and between MATRIX CAPITAL BANK,
(hereinafter referred to as the "BANK") and GARY LENZO (hereinafter referred to
as the "EMPLOYEE").

WHEREAS, the Employee has heretofore been employed by the Bank as President and
Chief Executive Officer, and

WHEREAS, the Bank wishes to assure itself of the services of the Employee as
outlined in SECTION 5. TERM of the original Employment Agreement, and
                       ----                                          

WHEREAS, the parties desire by this writing to set forth the continued
employment relationship of the Bank and the Employee.

NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed to amend SECTION 2. BASE COMPENSATION and SECTION 5.
                                                -----------------               
TERM as follows:
----            

2.  BASE COMPENSATION. The Bank agrees to pay the Employee during the terms of
    -----------------                                                         
this Addendum, a salary at the rate of $120,000.00 per annum payable in cash not
less frequently than twice monthly and shall be increased annually in such an
amount as the Board of Directors may determine.

5.  TERM. This Addendum extends the period of employment an additional twelve
    ----                                                                     
(12) months, per performance evaluation by the Board of Directors, as outlined
in the original Employment Contract, thereby extending the term of said
Employment Agreement to JANUARY 1, 2001.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Employment Agreement
Addendum, on the 28th day of January 1998.

                                        MATRIX CAPITAL BANK


                                        BY:   /s/
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        NAME: D. Mark Spencer
                                        ITS:  Chairman


                                        BY:   /s/
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        NAME: Gary Lenzo
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25542]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-2827-000]

Cinergy Services, Inc., Notice of Filing

September 22, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 6, 1997, Cinergy Services, Inc., 
tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before September 30, 1997. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25542 Filed 9-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2891 

To reauthorize the program of grants for innovative programs to address 

dental workforce needs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 

Mr. BOOKER (for himself, Mr. BUDD, and Ms. HIRONO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the program of grants for innovative 

programs to address dental workforce needs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Action for Dental 

5 Health Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF GRANT PROGRAM FOR IN7 NOVATIVE DENTAL PROGRAMS. 

8 Section 340G(f) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 256g(f)) is amended by striking ‘‘$13,903,000 for 

10 each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023’’ and inserting 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2891 IS

1 ‘‘$15,200,000 for fiscal year 2024, $15,500,000 for fiscal 

2 year 2025, and $15,800,000 for fiscal year 2026, to re3 main available until expended’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
From: Fairchild, Susan

To: "Higgins, Cortney"

Cc: VanLare, Paula; Okoye, Winifred; Barnett, Keith

Subject: NNN cost number

I checked on the NNN supplemental proposal cost number I had balked at during our meeting today.

The number is accurate: facilities already own controls, and do not have to buy controls to reduce their organic

HAP (phenol, formaldehyde and methanol) but they would incur costs to burn natural gas at about $125,000 per

bonded line. That is 6 facilities at 125K per bonded line means 750K per year for operating their controls.

At our meeting, that seemed like a high number to me, but when considering their production levels and the cost of

natural gas, it now seems correct.

Thanks,

Susan Fairchild

Environmental Scientist

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

direct line: 919.541.5167

fax: 919.541-3207

email: fairchild.susan@epa.gov

Overnight mail address:

US EPA

Mail Code D243-04

109 TW Alexander Drive

RTP, NC 27709
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2146 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2146

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
   To extend relocation expenses test programs for Federal employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RELOCATION EXPENSES TEST PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 5739 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
        (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``for a period not to 
    exceed 24 months''; and
        (2) in subsection (e), by striking ``7 years'' and inserting 
    ``11 years''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as though enacted as part of the Travel and Transportation 
Reform Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-264; 112 Stat. 2350).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
COURT OF CHANCERY

OF THE

SAM GLASSCOCK III

VICE CHANCELLOR

STATE OF DELAWARE COURT OF CHANCERY COURTHOUSE

34 THE CIRCLE

GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947

November 5, 2019

A. Thompson Bayliss

Adam K. Schulman

Abrams & Bayliss LLP

20 Montchanin Road, Suite 200

Wilmington, DE 19807

T. Brad Davey

Andrew H. Sauder

Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP

1313 N. Market Street

Wilmington, DE 19899

RE: Robert O. Carr v. Global Payments Inc. and Heartland Payment 

Systems, LLC; C.A. No. 2018-0565-SG; Motion for Reargument

Date Submitted: November 4, 2019

Date Decided: November 5, 2019

Dear Counsel:

Before me is Plaintiff’s Motion for Reargument. The matter involves an 

advancement claim. I began the Memorandum Opinion under consideration by 

noting that such actions are often redolent of buyer’s remorse. Any judicial decision 

granting a motion for reargument must be a subject of unqualified judicial remorse. 

This is such a decision.

My Memorandum Opinion of October 31, 2019 contains a basic and 

substantial error of fact. Upon review of the Plaintiff’s Motion, it is clear that it must 

be withdrawn, which is the object of this Letter Order. Whether, and to what extent, 

the rectification of the error requires a substantive change in the outcome of the 
2

advancement issue therein addressed awaits briefing on the Motion for Reargument, 

but it is clear that regardless of that ultimate outcome, the Memorandum Opinion 

should be, and hereby is, withdrawn.

I take exception to one assertion made in Plaintiff’s Motion. He blames the 

error in the Memorandum Opinion on the Defendants. That assertion is misplaced. 

Responsibility rests solely with the finder of fact, the author of the Memorandum 

Opinion.

My Memorandum Opinion of October 31, 2019 is WITHDRAWN. 

To the extent the foregoing requires an order to take effect, it is SO 

ORDERED.

Sincerely,

/s/ Sam Glasscock III

Sam Glasscock III
#### Lee Raymond OGLETREE, Appellant, v. SENTRY INDEMNITY COMPANY and Willie Davis, Appellees.

No. FF-484.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 6, 1978.

Anthony I. Provitola, DeLand, for appel-lant-

Frank Marriott, Jr., of Gosney, Cameron & Parsons> Daytona Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/plaintiff Ogletree and Appel-lee Davis were involved in an automobile collision which occurred when Appellant, after stopping at a STOP sign and “easing on across” an intersection, was hit broadside by Appellee, who had pulled out on the highway from a gas station more than 100 feet from the intersection. At the ensuing trial, the jury found in favor of Appellee, allowing Appellant no recovery. The trial judge refused to give an instruction requested by Appellant on Section 316.121(1), Fla.Stat., which sets out the duty of a driver approaching an intersection to yield the right of way to a vehicle which has entered the intersection from a different highway. He did instruct on Section 316.123, which prescribes the duty to stop at STOP signs and yield the right of way to vehicles on the protected road. He also gave Standard Jury Instruction 4.1, defining negligence as the failure to use reasonable care. We find no error in the failure to instruct on Section 316.121(1). This Court held in *Allen v. Rucks,*121 So.2d 167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960), that it was improper for a court in a similar situation to charge solely on the statute requested here by Appellant because it was “inadequate and misleading” when applied to the facts of the case. We conceive that the same is true here. It would be extremely perplexing, and we think improper, to instruct a jury that the driver of a vehicle at a STOP sign must stop and yield the way to oncoming vehicles but that a driver of a vehicle on the street not controlled by the STOP sign must yield the right of way to the vehicle if it enters the intersection first.

We find Appellant’s other point to be without merit.

AFFIRMED.

*668McCORD, C. J., and MELVIN, J., concur.

BOYER, J., dissents.

BOYER, Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. In my view *Allen*v. *Rucks,*cited in the majority opinion, has no application to the facts sub judice. Here, the evidence revealed, as recited in the majority opinion, that Ogletree stopped at the stop sign and was then “easing on across” when he was hit broadside by Davis, who had entered the intersecting street from a gas station a short distance from the intersection. A driver who has legally entered a controlled intersection does not thereby become fair game for anyone who can hit him before he can get through the intersection. The jury should have been instructed, in my view, that one legally entering a controlled intersection, viz.: After obeying the traffic control and determining that there was no other vehicle in the intersection nor so close thereto as to constitute an immediate hazard, has thereupon preempted the intersection and accordingly has the right of way over other vehicles entering the intersection. I would reverse.
#### Homer ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PROVIDENCE WASHINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 3248.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Dec. 9, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 5, 1971.

Writ Refused Feb. 24, 1971.

Bernard Kramer, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant.

Gold, Hall & Skye, by John F. Simon, for T. C. McLure, Jr., Jules L. Davidson, Gist, Methvin & Trimble, by James T. Trimble, Jr., Alexandria, for defendants-appellees.

Before SAVOY, HOOD and CULPEP-PER, JJ.

SAVOY, Judge.

This is a companion case to Cummings'v. Providence Washington Insurance Company et al., La.App., 242 So.2d 8, decided this date. See that case for a discussion of the facts and issues of this case.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Costs of the appeal are assessed equally between the plaintiff in this suit and the plaintiff in the companion suit.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 188 (Monday, September 29, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 50891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25589]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-8; RM-8957]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Amelia, LA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; denial of petition for rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission denies the petition for rule making filed by 
Amelia Broadcasting of Louisiana, proposing the allotment of Channel 
249C3 to Amelia, Louisiana. See 62 FR 3851, January 27, 1997. The 
proposal is denied because of the lack of a suitable transmitter site. 
With this action, this proceeding is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 97-8, adopted September 10, 1997, and 
released September 19, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, DC. 
The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th 
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-25589 Filed 9-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-U