SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO . A - 0300
- 17T4

INTER - NATION CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORP. (PANAMA), S.A., STATIOL INC., S.A., INTER - NATION CAPITAL GROUP, INC. and JOHN KELLENYI, Plaintiffs

- Respondents,

v. METRO COUNTRY CLUB, S.A., MEDIA GLOBAL FINANCE LTD. and LUIS JOSE ASILIS, Defendants
- Appellants.

_______________________________

Argued February 5, 2018
- Decided Before Judges Accurso, Vernoia and De A lmeida. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Essex County, D ocket No. C - 0000 54
- 17. Jorge A. Mestre (Rivero Mestre LLP) of the Florida bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellants ( Bertone Piccini, LLP , and Jorge A. Mestre, attorneys; Cristina Z. Sinclair and Marc W. Garber, of counsel; Jorge A. Mest re and Amanda M. McGovern ( Rivero Mestre LLP) of the Florida

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court . " A lthough it is posted on the internet , this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited . R. 1:36
- 3.

July 13, 20182 A - 0300
- 17T4 bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel and on the brief s ; Daniel Alvarez Sox ( Rivero Mestre LLP) of the Florida bar, admitted pro hac vice, on the brief s ). Michael J. Geraghty argued the cause f or respondents ( Sills Cummis & Gross PC, attorneys; Michael J. Geraghty, of counsel and on the brief; Kenneth F. Oettle, on the brief).
PER CURIAM Defendants Metro Country Club, Media Gl obal Finance and Luis Asilis appeal on leave granted from the Chancery Division's denial of their motion to dismiss the complaint filed by plaintif fs Inter
- Nation Capital Management Corp. (Panama), Statiol Inc., Inter

- Nation Capital Management Group and John Kellenyi for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm, substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Kessler in his cogent and comprehensive opinion from the bench on July 21,
2017. Metro Country Club is a residential golf club community in the Dominican Re public, organized under the laws of that country. Asilis, a citizen of the Dominican Republic, is president of Metro and its subsidiary , Media Global Finance , a company devoted to developing and operating residential communities and resorts in the Dominic an Republic. Media Global is organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands,3 A - 0300
- 17T4

although its principal place of business is in the Dominican Republic. In February 2012, Asilis called Alberto Fernandez in his office in Maplewood looking for financing . The two met when Fernandez, a New Jersey resident, purchased a vacation home in

Metro in 2000 and told Asilis he did financial advising and consulting internationally through his New Jersey companies. When Fernandez said he was interested, Asilis told him Carlos Cortina, Metro's chief financial officer , would call him to discuss particulars. Cortina called Fernandez at his Maplewood office, explaining that Metro had a multi

- million dollar loan, guaranteed by Media Global, coming due in a few weeks' time. Metro and Media Global need ed financing to pay off the loan or have the loan and collateral assigned to a new lender. Fernandez agreed to solicit investors through his investment consulting bus iness, Inter - N ation Capital Management G roup , a New Jersey corporation , for a fee payable on the closing of the transaction , conditioned on the loan being enforceable in the United States.

Fernan dez solicited Statiol Inc. , S.A . , a Panamanian company havin g a principal place of business in Chile and John Kellenyi, another Maplewood resident, as investors, along with4 A - 0300
- 17T4

Inter - Nation Capital Management Corp. , a Panamanian corporation with its principal place of business in Maplewood, which is a wholly
- owned subs idiary of Inter
- Nation Capital Managem e nt Group, formed to hold Fernandez's personal investments . Cortina traveled to New Jersey to meet with Fernandez in the Inter

Nation offices in Maplewood. Cortina advised Fernandez that
Metro was working on long

- term financing from IVO Capital Partners, an international investment firm . Cortina explained

Metro and Media Global needed approximately $4 million in bridge financing only until the IVO financing was in place. Fernandez, acting on b ehalf of Statiol, Kellenyi and Inter - Nation Capital Management Corp . , began negoti ating the terms of a loan purchase and refinancing with Cortina. In March, Asilis and Fernandez negotiated the terms of the bridge loan from Statiol, Kellenyi and Inter

- Nati on Capital Management Corp., acting as an informal lending group , to Metro, guaranteed by Media Global an d secured by various collateral through a series of phone calls and email messages to Fernandez in New Jersey. Asilis assured Fernandez in the cou rse of those negotiations that M etro had a firm commitment for long
- term financing from IVO to close in 2013 and was only seeking bridge financing from the lending group. Based on Asilis' representation, the three
- member lending group agreed to loan5 A - 0300
- 17T4

Metro $6 million , $4 million to purchase Metro's outstanding loan and the remainder to refinance a commercial paper obligation and fund working capital. The lending group took an assignment of the loan and
collateral documents and en tered into a "Frame Agreement" with Metro amending the prior loan documents and increasing the principal am ount of the loan to $6 million ( later increased to $6.5 million ) , subject to Metro's delivery of three promissory notes to the lending group . The Fr ame Agreement is expressly governed by New Jersey law and was executed by Fernandez and Kellenyi in New Jersey. Metro eventually defaulted on the payments, although not before making certain payments required under the loan documents by wire transfer to v arious banks in the United States, including to Inter

- Nation Capital Management Corp. to Valley National Bank in Maplewood. Fernandez contends Cortina admitted
after the default that Metro had not had a firm commitment for long
- term financing from IVO as Asilis had assured Fernandez before the lending group committed to making the loan and could not pay the lending group what it was owed without such financing. Notwithstanding that the lending group entered into a standstill agreement with Metro and Media Global agreeing to forbear payment on the outstanding aggregate amount then due and6 A - 0300
- 17T4

owing of $ 7,896,111.14 for eighteen months in order to permit Metro and Media Global to obtain other financing, Metro ultimately defaulted on that agreement as well, resul ting in the compl aint plaintiffs filed in the Chancery Division for specific performance of Metro's obligations to produce books and records,
as well as for breach of contract agai nst both Metro and Media
Global and fraud against both those defendants and Asilis . Defendant s moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing they have no contacts with New Jersey. Specifically, defendant s contend ed the properties, businesses, collateral and the business interests at issue in the litigation are in the Dominican Republ ic. They argued they made no "purposeful foray" into New Jersey, as that term was defined in Bayway Refining Co. v. State Util it i e s, Inc. , 333 N.J. Super. 420, 431 (App. Div. 2000) , and instead that the dispute arose following plaintiffs' contacts and pur poseful investment in the Dominican Republic.
Jud ge Kessler rejected those arguments. Applying the test
of Waste Management v. Admiral Ins urance Co. , 138 N.J. 106, 122 (1994) , the judge had no hesitation in finding defendants had sufficient minimum conta cts to establish specific jurisdiction in New Jersey. The judge found Asilis initiated the loan agreement between Metro and Media Global and defendants when he telephoned Fernandez in New Jersey to seek financing, rejecting7 A - 0300
- 17T4

defendants' claim that Fernandez initiated the contact by marketing his ability to obtain investors and financing to Metro in 2000 . T he judge also rejected defendants' argument that their contacts with New Jersey were only incidental to Fernandez's unilateral decision to be in New Jersey , instead of his domicile in the Dominican Republic, when he was negotia ting the loan in February 2012. The judge was unpersuaded by the fact that Fernandez owned a vacation home and may have maintained a second domicile in the Dominican Republ ic. De fendant s did not dispute that Fernandez was a New Jersey resident when they solici ted him in New Jersey. More important, they followed
- up that contact by sending Cortina to New Jersey to meet with Fernandez to obtain investors , one of whom, Kelleny i, they knew resided in New Jersey. Defendants thereafter continued the negotiations through telephone and email directed to Fernandez in New Jersey , leading to an a greement governed by New Jersey law. Considering the extent and variety of their contacts , the judge was satisfied defendants purposefully availed themselves of the State's benefits and " should ' reasonably anticipate being haled into court [in the forum state]. ' " B ayw ay Ref. Co. , 333 N.J. Super. at 429 (quoting World
- Wide Volkswagen Corp. v.
Woodson , 444 U.S. 286, 297 (1980)). Judge Kessler found8 A - 0300
- 17T4

defendants, as the Florida boat seller in Lebel v. Everglades Marina, Inc. , 115 N.J. 317, 320
- 22 (1989), obtained a significant benefit, here bridge financing of over $6 million, by soliciting a New Jersey resident, in New Jersey , to obtain the money . Judge Kessler reasoned that in reaching into New Jersey for the loan, defendants "impliedly understood that they could be haled into a New Jersey court" in the event they failed to repay it. The judge found Asilis' allegedly false statement about the IVO loan commitment made to induce plaintiffs to make the loan likewise satisfied the test for m inimum contacts . See id. at 32 6 (" Where a defendant knowingly sends into a state a false statement, intending that it should then be relied upon to the injury of a resident of that state, he has, for jurisdictional purposes, acted within that state. ") (quoting Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. v. Delta Int'l Corp. , 696 F. 2d 1062, 1066 (4th Cir. 1982) ).
J udge Kessler f urther found suit in New Jersey would "not offend 'traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.'" Waste Mgmt. , 138 N.J. at 120 (quoting World
- W ide Volkswage n , 444 U.S. at 292 ). He found New Jersey certainly had an interest in carrying out it s law and protecting those residents who lend fund s in good faith, which outweighed any inconvenience to defendants in litigating in New Jersey,9 A - 0300
- 17T4

particularly where defendants had already sent a representative to the State in connection with the loan. Defendants appeal, reprising the arguments they made to the trial court and adding the court erred in exercising personal jur isdiction over Media Global as the court failed to make any findings of fact specific to that entity to establish its minimum conta cts with New Jersey. Our review of the reco rd convinces us that none of tho se arguments is of sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11
- 3(e)(1)(E). There is no question but that "[t] he requirement s of minimum contacts analysi s ' must be met as to each defendant over whom a state court exercises jurisdiction. ' " Waste M gmt . , 138 N.J. at 127 (quoting Rush v.
Savchuk , 444 U.S. 320, 3 32 (1980) ) . Here, however, the record makes very apparent both Asilis and Cortina were acting on
b ehalf of both Metro and Media Global its wholly owned subsidiary and guarantor of the loan to be refinanced. The judge highlighted those facts in his opinion. Accordingly, we
f ind any failure by the judge to specifically mention Media
Global as he was su mming up his findings to be of no moment .10 A - 0300
- 17T4

We affirm, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge
Kessler's clear and comprehensive opinion from the bench on July 21, 2017. Affirmed.