alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1






                                   EXHIBIT 21











                                       78

<PAGE>   2

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF MEDICAL ASSURANCE, INC.



         Mutual Assurance, Inc. (Alabama)
                  Mutual Assurance Agency of Ohio, Inc. (Ohio)
                  MAI Corporation (Delaware)
                           Mutual Assurance Agency, Inc. (Alabama)
                           PROActive Insurance Corporation (Alabama)
                           Educational Services Institute, Inc. (Alabama)

         Medical Assurance of West Virginia, Inc. (West Virginia)
         Physicians Insurance Company of Indiana (Indiana)
         MOMED Holding Co. (Missouri)
                  Missouri Medical Insurance Company (Missouri)
                  Professional Liability Associates, Inc. (Missouri)
                  Momedico Professional Services, Inc. (Missouri)





                                       79
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(b)



                        Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
GE Life and Annuity Assurance Company
  and
Contractholders
GE Life & Annuity Separate Account 4:

We consent to the use of our reports included herein and to the reference to our
firm under the heading "Experts" in the Statement of Additional Information.

Our report on the consolidated financial statements of GE Life and Annuity
Assurance Company and subsidiary dated January 22, 2001 contains an explanatory
paragraph that states the Company changed its method of account for
insurance-related assessments in 1999.


                                                /s/ KPMG LLP


Richmond, VA
January 11, 2002
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

AMANDA R. THOMAS, : Case No. 4:14-CV-0543

: 

 :

Plaintiffs, :

v. : (Judge Brann)

:

KEYSTONE REAL ESTATE :

GROUP LP, :

:

Defendant. :

......................................................................................................................................

DEBORAH M. STEWART, : Case No. 4:14-CV-1050

 :

Plaintiff, :

v. : (Judge Brann)

:

KEYSTONE REAL ESTATE :

GROUP LP, :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

May 28, 2015

In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion issued this date, Plaintiffs

Affidavits filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §144, insofar as they are requests for recusal,

are DENIED. (Docket No. 4:14-CV-0543, ECF No. 56 and Docket No. 4:14-1050,

1

Case 4:14-cv-00543-MWB Document 65 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 2
ECF No. 25.)

BY THE COURT:

s/Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

2

Case 4:14-cv-00543-MWB Document 65 Filed 05/28/15 Page 2 of 2
October 11, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

RONALD DWAYNE WHITFIELD, Appellant

NO. 14-16-00441-CR 

NO. 14-16-00442-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
### Geology and ground-water resources of Bartow County, Georgia

By: M.G. Croft

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1619FF

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Floyd M. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. Jane TAYLOR, Appellee.

No. EE-89.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 4, 1977.

Charles A. Sorenson, of Forbes & Meide Law Offices, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Clarence M. Wood, of Wood, Donaldson & Godfrey, Jacksonville, for appellee.

SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.

The substantial fee money award by the trial court is not impeached by the record brought to us and is attributable to substantial services necessarily rendered in overcoming appellant’s apparent duplicity. *Chaachou*v. *Chaachou,*135 So.2d 206 (Fla.1961).

AFFIRMED. Appellee’s motion for an allowance of fee money for the services of her attorney on appeal is PROVISIONALLY GRANTED. *Dresser v. Dresser,*350 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSSME seal test program:  Test results for hole-pattern damper sealsThe results consisting of direct and transverse force coefficients are presented for thirteen, hole-pattern, damper-seal configurations. The designation damper seal refers to a seal which uses a deliberately roughened stator nd smooth rotor, to increase the net damping force developed by a seal. The designation hole-pattern refers to a stator roughness pattern which is developed by a pattern of round holes while are milled into the stator. All seals tested use the same smooth rotor and have the same constant minimum clearance. The seal tests examined the following major design options: (1) hole-area density, i.e., the proportion of stator surface area consumed by holes; and (2) hole depth, particularly the ratio of hole depth to minimum clearance. In addition, limited data were taken to examine the influence of in-line versus staggered hole patterns and flat-bottomed versus spherical-bottomed holes.Document ID19850022746Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsChilds, D. W.*(Texas A&M Univ. College Station, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1985Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-171595NAS 1.26:171595TRC-SEAL-4-85Accession Number85N31059Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-33716Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850022746.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 10.44
  AMENDMENT
    #1 TO THE
    CLINICAL TRIAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN
    VION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND THE
    DIVISION OF CANCER TREATMENT AND DIAGNOSIS, NCI
    DATED MARCH 2, 2006
    1.
    Expiration
    Date    2.
    Article 1.
    Definitions    3.
    Article 6.
    Drug Information and Supply    301-496-5725).
      4.
    Article 7.
    Data Rights    Standards for Privacy of
    Individually Identifiable Health Information
  5.
    Add the
    following Article 23:  Article 23.  Monitoring
 90




---



##### 



AGREED TO
    AND ACCEPTED BY:
  For the National Cancer Institute:/s/  James
    Doroshow

February 13, 2006James Doroshow, M.D., FACP

DateDirector, Division of Cancer Treatment and DiagnosisFor Vion Pharmaceuticals:/s/  Ann
    Cahill

March 2, 2006Ann Cahill PA-C

DateVice President, Clinical Development  91
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR VRB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          17,087
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,600
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     54,890
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          18,010
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            17,898
<LOANS>                                        201,504
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 311,504
<DEPOSITS>                                     276,366
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,528
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,699
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 311,504
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 17,345
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,348
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                22,694
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,413
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,280
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 10,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,772
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,772
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,888
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    .083
<LOANS-NON>                                        551
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,539
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       86
<RECOVERIES>                                        50
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,503
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,503
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Crim. No. 4:15-CR-0083

:

v. : (Judge Brann)

:

ALAN J. FASSETT, :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2015, IT IS ORDERED THAT the

Government’s Motion to Disqualify Attorney Arthur Agnellino is GRANTED. 

ECF No. 49. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appearance of Arthur D.

Agnellino, Esquire, on behalf of Defendant Alan J. Fassett, is withdrawn. 

BY THE COURT:

s/Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

Case 4:15-cr-00083-MWB Document 76 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 1
### Hydrology of Massachusetts. Part 1, summary of stream flow and precipitation records

By: C. E. KnoxR. M. Soule

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1105

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Ex parte Joseph E. BROUGHTON.

SC 2575.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 26, 1977.

TORBERT, Chief Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

MADDOX, FAULKNER, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
Case 04-03024-MBM Doc 27 Filed 05/18/05 Entered 05/19/05 13:05:49 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 6
Case 04-03024-MBM Doc 27 Filed 05/18/05 Entered 05/19/05 13:05:49 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 6
Case 04-03024-MBM Doc 27 Filed 05/18/05 Entered 05/19/05 13:05:49 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 6
Case 04-03024-MBM Doc 27 Filed 05/18/05 Entered 05/19/05 13:05:49 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 6
Case 04-03024-MBM Doc 27 Filed 05/18/05 Entered 05/19/05 13:05:49 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 6
Case 04-03024-MBM Doc 27 Filed 05/18/05 Entered 05/19/05 13:05:49 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 6
#### Robert Earl WALKER v. STATE.

No. 38833.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 222 So.2d 760.
### Geology and ground-water hydrology of the Mokelumne area, California

By: A. M. PiperH. S. GaleH. E. ThomasT. W. Robinson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp780

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report** 
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Cattledeath loss.**
 
2006:zip | txt | pdf
2011:zip | txt | pdf
 
SuDoc Number:A 92.2:C 29/3/
Item Number:0122-A-07 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001063464
 
July 13, 2018
EXHIBIT  32.1

                                  SECTION 1350
                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Robert Fallah, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Key Command International Corp., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2004 (the "Quarterly Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Key
Command International Corp.


Date:  March 16, 2005                           BY: /s/ Robert Fallah
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Robert Fallah
                                                    Chief  Executive Officer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Key Command International Corp.
and will be retained by Key Command International Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Oscar W. TUCKER, Jr., Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Adult Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-174.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 6, 1970.

Oscar W. Tucker, Jr., in pro. per.

Earl .Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner contends that he is entitled to a full appellate review by way of habeas corpus of an order of the trial court denying his motion under Criminal Procedure Rule 1.850, 33 F.S.A. under the authority of Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239.

The respondent’s return and the record in this cause conclusively show that the petitioner’s notice of appeal whereby he sought review of the order denying relief under Criminal Procedure Rule 1.850 was not filed within 30 days from the rendition of said order. The notice of appeal was dated on the 29th day from the rendition of the order; the envelope containing the notice of appeal was postmarked on the 30th day, and the clerk of the lower court received the same on the 33rd day after rendition of the order.

There is no allegation that the State in any way had anything to do with the notice of appeal being received by the clerk of the lower court after the 30-day appeal time established by the appellate rules. All of petitioner’s allegations of State actions depriving him of his right to appeal are actions which occurred subsequent to the expiration of the 30 days in which to perfect an appeal.

For the foregoing reasons the petition for writ of habeas corpus is discharged.

HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ„ concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DANIEL EUGENE STOFFA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 286 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DANIEL EUGENE STOFFA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 287 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 183 (Monday, September 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EC97-53-000]


Portland General Electric Co; Notice of Filing

September 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, Portland General Electric 
Company (``PGE''), tendered for filing pursuant to Section 203 of the 
Federal Power Act (the ``FPA''), 16 U.S.C. Sec. 824b, Part 33 of the 
Commission's regulations, 18 CFR Part 33, and 18 CFR 2.26, an 
Application for an order approving the assignment and transfer of two 
contracts to its corporate affiliate, Enron Power Marketing, Inc. 
(``EPMI'').
    PGE states that the contracts proposed to be assigned are a 
Settlement Exchange Agreement, dated September 17, 1985, between the 
United States of America, and the Department of Energy, acting through 
the Bonneville Power Administration and PGE. The second contract is a 
Long-Term Power Sale Agreement dated August 24, 1987, between PGE and 
the United States of America, acting through the Western Area Power 
Administration. PGE states that the proposed assignment will give EPMI, 
a power marketer and broker, the ability to administer the contracts. 
PGE requests expeditious review of the Application.
    PGE states that a copy of the Application is being served upon the 
Oregon Public Utilities Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest such filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before September 29, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25064 Filed 9-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M