alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Pitkin *et al., Plaintiffs in*Error, v. Miller *et*al., *Defendants in Error.*

DIVISION TWO.

The Case of *Pitkin et al. v. Shacklett, ante,*p. 571, followed and affirmed.

*Error to Scotland Circuit Court.*— Hon. Ben. E. Turner, Judge.

Reversed and remanded.

*McKee & Jayne*for plaintiffs in error.

*E. Schofield*and *Smoot & Pettingill*for defendants in error.

Gantt, P. J.

This is an action of ejectment for forty acres of land in Scotland county, off of the east end of the north half of the northwest quarter of section 3, in township 64, range 10, Plaintiff ’ s claim is based on a tax deed that has been considered in the case of *Pitkin v. Richard H.*Shacklett, ante, p. 571.

The same defense is made in this as was in that. The circuit court correctly found for defendant, as to the possession. The claim is now made that the court should at least have allowed the purchase money paid at the tax sale, and the subsequent taxes, etc. The circuit court for the reasons given in *Pitkin v.*Shacklett, *supra,*should have allowed plaintiffs in this case the proper proportion of the purchase money paid for the eighty-four acres at the tax sale and of the subsequent taxes.

For failure to do this, the judgment is reversed and cause remanded with directions to the circuit court to enter judgment in accordance with this opinion. All concur.
#### Sherry Lee HARRISON, a *minor by*her next friend and father, J. T. Harrison and J. T. Harrison, individually, Appellants, v. CITY OF CRESTVIEW, a Florida municipal corporation, Appellee. Glenda ADAMS and Nova Adams, minors, by their next friend and father, Joel L. Adams and Joel L. Adams, individually, Appellants, v. CITY OF CRESTVIEW, a Florida municipal corporation, Appellee.

Nos. N-7, N-40.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 22, 1971.

*87Brooks Taylor, Crestview, for appellants.

Campbell, Rice & Dewrell, Crestview, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of City of Tampa v. Davis, 226 So.2d 450 (Fla.App.1969), and Mathews v. City of Tampa, 227 So.2d 211 (Fla.App.1969).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
#### Mack SIMMONS, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 49988.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 29, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Julian S. Mack and Karen M. Gottlieb, Asst. Public Defenders, Miami, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Sidney M. Pertnoy and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARIANNA DANIELSEN, : 4:13-CV-02927

:

:

Plaintiff, : (Judge Brann)

v. :

:

PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF :

TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNITY :

ARTS CENTER, :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER 

January 28, 2015

In accordance with the memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT: 

1. The Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Complaint, ECF

No. 20, is GRANTED. 

2. The Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is dismissed for failure to

plead the exhaustion of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act’s

administrative remedies. Counts I and II are dismissed with prejudice. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the case file. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s Matthew W. Brann

Matthew W. Brann 

United States District Judge

Case 4:13-cv-02927-MWB Document 23 Filed 01/28/15 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and related Prospectuses of VCampus Corporation of our report dated
March 15, 2002, except for Note 17, as to which the date is March 27, 2002, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of VCampus
Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2001, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

    o    Form S-8 (No. 333-42803),
    o    Form S-8 (No. 333-90489),
    o    Form S-8 (No. 333-64166),
    o    Form S-3 (No. 333-64732); and
    o    Form S-3 (No. 333-60076).


                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


McLean, Virginia
March 27, 2002
#### UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a Maryland Corporation, Appellant, v. Vivian HARRIS, as personal representative of the Estate of Stanley Harris, Appellee.

No. 77-1280.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 22, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 20, 1978.

Knight, Peters, Pickle, Niemoeller & Flynn, Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellant.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward A. Perse, Cohen & Kokus, Miami, for appellee.

*389Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Tucker v. Government Employees Insurance Co.,*288 So.2d 238 (Fla. 1973); *Wade v. Clower,*94 Fla. 817, 114 So. 548 (1927); *Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Spreen,*343 So.2d 649, 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Anderson,*332 So.2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); *Moore v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.,*277 So.2d 839, 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); *Sellers v. Government Employees Insurance Co.,*214 So.2d 879 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968). Cf. *Marks v. Travelers Indemnity Co.,*339 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *Travelers Insurance Co. v. Pac,*337 So.2d 397 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976).
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2786 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2786

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to include 
the provision of tree nuts under the seniors farmers' market nutrition 
                    program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2023

Mr. Tuberville introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to include 
the provision of tree nuts under the seniors farmers' market nutrition 
                    program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farmers' Market Expansion Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. SENIORS FARMERS' MARKET NUTRITION PROGRAM.

    Section 4402(b)(1) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 
2002 (7 U.S.C. 3007(b)(1)) is amended by striking ``and herbs'' and 
inserting ``herbs, and tree nuts''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0200

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TIMOTHY GALE MUNYAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 4, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 30 2021

08/30/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0200
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL IRAHETA, AKA Danie Iraheta 

Iraheta, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-73405 

Agency No. A026-763-474 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 11, 2019

**

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Daniel Iraheta, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. 

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 13 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-73405 

part the petition for review.

Iraheta does not raise, and therefore waives any challenge to, the agency’s 

denial of his motion to reopen as untimely. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 

F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in an 

opening brief are waived). Because timeliness is dispositive, to the extent Iraheta 

challenges the agency’s denial of reopening for failure to show prima facie 

eligibility for cancellation of removal, we do not address that contention. See 

Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (the courts and the agency

are not required to make findings on issues the decision of which is unnecessary to 

the results).

To the extent Iraheta challenges the agency’s denials of asylum and related 

relief and relief under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act

in his previous deportation proceedings, we lack jurisdiction to consider those 

contentions as this petition is untimely as to those decisions. See 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(b)(1).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 65000
<PP&E>                                          204183
<DEPRECIATION>                                   49691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  219492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           714274
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       2000
<COMMON>                                         14006
<OTHER-SE>                                     (510788)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    219492
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                304760
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2438748
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2130888)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2130888)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2130888)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.17)


</TABLE>
#### Joseph C. McWHORTER, Jr. v. James E. MERRITT.

No. 45505.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 24, 1969.

Harvey T. Ross, Clarksdale, for appellant.

Holcomb, Curtis & Connell, Clarksdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
VI 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2195 

For the relief of Ilya Shestakov. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2006 

Mr. STEVENS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Ilya Shestakov. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101 et seq.), Ilya Shestakov shall be held and considered 

7 to have been lawfully admitted to the United States for 

8 permanent residence as of the date of the enactment of 

9 this Act upon payment of the required visa fee. 

10 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

11 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Ilya 

12 Shestakov as provided in this Act, the Secretary of State 
2 

•S 2195 IS

1 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1 during the 

2 current fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas 

3 available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth 

4 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)). 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24431]



[[Page 48683]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT ASSESSMENT COMMISSION


Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the meetings of the Prospective Payment 
Assessment Commission on Tuesday and Wednesday, September 23 and 24, 
1997, at the Madison Hotel, 15th & M Streets, NW, Washington, DC, 202/
862-1600.
    The Full Commission will convene at 9:00 a.m. on September 23, 
1997, and adjourn at approximately 5:00 p.m. On Wednesday, September 
24, 1997, the meeting will convene at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn at 
approximately 12:30 p.m. The meetings will be held in Executive 
Chambers 1, 2, and 3 each day.
    All meetings are open to the public.
Donald A. Young,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-24431 Filed 9-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-BW-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            3,700
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    19,487
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (1,180)
<INVENTORY>                                         217
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 30,565
<PP&E>                                          439,072
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (118,659)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  631,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            58,402
<BONDS>                                         243,682
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          5,140
<OTHER-SE>                                      242,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    631,965
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                266,625
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   142,751
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (4,967)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    283
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               29,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 109,888
<INCOME-TAX>                                     45,164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              64,724
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     64,724
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      1.25
        



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


         We hereby consent to references to the use of the name H.J. Gruy and
Associates, Inc. and of references to H. J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. and to the
inclusion of and references to our reports, or information contained therein,
dated September 25, 1997, August 28, 1998 and August 2, 1999, prepared for Queen
Sand Resources, Inc. in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Queen Sand Resources,
Inc. for the filing dated August 28, 2000, and by incorporation by reference in
the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Number 333-47577, Number 333-61375, Number
333-70993, and Number 333-78001 and Form S-8 Number 333- 67951) of Queen Sand
Resources, Inc. and in the related prospectuses.





                                          H.J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
                                          Texas Registration Number F-000637

                                          By: /s/ ROBERT J. NAAS
                                              ----------------------------------

                                          Name: Robert J. Naas
                                          Title: Executive Vice President

Dallas, Texas
August 25, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49260-49261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24914]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. IA 97-068; ASLBP No. 97-731-01-EA]


Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; Notice of Hearing

    Before Administrative Judges: Charles Bechhoefer, Chairman, Dr. 
Jerry R. Kline, Dr. Peter S. Lam.

September 15, 1997.
    Notice is hereby given that, by Memorandum and Order (Granting 
Request for Hearing and Scheduling Prehearing Conference), dated 
September 11, 1997, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board has granted 
the request of Aharon Ben-Haim, Ph.D., for a hearing in the above-
titled proceeding. The hearing concerns the Order Superseding Order 
Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities (Effective 
Immediately) (hereinafter, Superseding Order), issued by the NRC Staff 
on August 27, 1997 (published at 62 FR 47224 (September 8, 1997)). The 
parties to the proceeding are Dr. Ben-Haim and the NRC Staff. The issue 
to be considered at the hearing is whether the Superseding Order should 
be sustained.
    Materials concerning this proceeding are on file at the 
Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L St., NW., Washington, DC 
20555, and at the Commission's Region I office, 475 Allendale Road, 
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406-1415.
    During the course of this proceeding, the Licensing Board, as 
necessary, will conduct one or more prehearing conferences and 
evidentiary hearing sessions. The time and place of these sessions will 
be announced in Licensing Board Orders. Members of the public are 
invited to attend any such sessions.

    Dated: Rockville, Maryland, September 15, 1997.


[[Page 49261]]


    For the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board.
Charles Bechhoefer,
Chairman Administrative Judge.
[FR Doc. 97-24914 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-U
S. 2146

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and six

An Act

To extend relocation expenses test programs for Federal employees.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RELOCATION EXPENSES TEST PROGRAMS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5739 of title 5, United States Code,

is amended—

(1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘for a period not to

exceed 24 months’’; and

(2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘7 years’’ and inserting

‘‘11 years’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section

shall take effect as though enacted as part of the Travel and

Transportation Reform Act of 1998 (Public Law 105–264; 112 Stat.

2350).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Julio E. DOMINGUEZ, Appellant, v. Saturnina FERNANDEZ and Juan M. Fernandez, her husband, Appellees.

No. 69-643.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 3, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.34    
  


TIME NOTE  


        For the value received, FORTEL Inc. promises to pay to the order of William R. Lonergan, the sum of Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) dollars, payable with
interest thereon at the rate of 18% per annum on the unpaid balance. 


        The
entire sum of principal and accrued interest shall be fully payable on September 20, 2001. 


        In
the event of default, FORTEL Inc. agrees to pay all reasonable attorney fees and costs of collection. 


        Signed
under seal this 22nd day of June, 2001. 



	

 	

FORTEL Inc.
	

 	

By:	
 	

/s/  ASA W. LANUM      
 Asa W. Lanum,

President & CEO
	

 	

By:	
 	

/s/  ROMEO R. DIZON      
 Romeo R. Dizon,

Acting CFO











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.34