alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 

CLIFTON WILLIAMS, : 4:08-cv-1915 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : 

 v. : Hon. John E. Jones III 

 : 

JEFFREY BEARD, et al., : 

 : 

 Defendant. : 

 

ORDER 

May 18, 2016

 In accordance with the bench trial of this matter and for the reasons set forth 

in the Memorandum Opinion issued on today’s date, the Court finds in favor of 

Plaintiff and against Defendant and hereby ORDERS that: 

1. Inasmuch as Plaintiff’s statutory rights under RLUIPA were violated by 

Defendants, Defendants will immediately remove the official misconduct 

violation from Plaintiff’s prison record arising from his saying prayer in 

the kitchen area on October 23, 2006. 

2. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, SCI-Mahanoy shall 

provide a clean and appropriate space for Muslim inmates working in the 

kitchen to offer prayer in a prone position during their shift all year 

round. Alternatively, if such a space cannot be created in the kitchen for 

Case 4:08-cv-01915-JEJ Document 187 Filed 05/18/16 Page 1 of 2
year-round prayer, Muslim inmates shall be permitted to offer prone 

prayer in the dining room while on kitchen duty. 

3. Plaintiff shall either be reinstated to his position in the kitchen at SCIMahanoy or, in the alternative, to another suitable job position within 

SCI-Mahanoy at the rate he would have been paid had he not been cited 

for the October 23, 2006 misconduct and subsequent loss of job 

4. Plaintiff’s counsel may submit an appropriate petition for attorneys’ fees 

within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. 

5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the file on this case. 

 s/ John E. Jones III 

 John E. Jones III 

 United States District Judge 

Case 4:08-cv-01915-JEJ Document 187 Filed 05/18/16 Page 2 of 2
Case 4:05-cv-02088-JFM-JVW Document 3 Filed 10/24/05 Page 1 of 7
Case 4:05-cv-02088-JFM-JVW Document 3 Filed 10/24/05 Page 2 of 7
Case 4:05-cv-02088-JFM-JVW Document 3 Filed 10/24/05 Page 3 of 7
Case 4:05-cv-02088-JFM-JVW Document 3 Filed 10/24/05 Page 4 of 7
Case 4:05-cv-02088-JFM-JVW Document 3 Filed 10/24/05 Page 5 of 7
Case 4:05-cv-02088-JFM-JVW Document 3 Filed 10/24/05 Page 6 of 7
Case 4:05-cv-02088-JFM-JVW Document 3 Filed 10/24/05 Page 7 of 7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GLUE WILKINS, :

:

Plaintiff :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-15-2244

:

JEFFREY HASTE, : (Judge Brann)

:

Defendant :

ORDER

 August 1, 2016

NOW, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff’s submissions (Docs. 7 & 8) are construed as a notice

of voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(a)(1) .

2. Plaintiff’s request for voluntary dismissal is accepted and his

pending action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

3. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED AS

MOOT.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 

1

Case 4:15-cv-02244-MWB-JVW Document 11 Filed 08/01/16 Page 1 of 2
5. If it is not Plaintiff’s desire to voluntarily dismiss this action,

he should file a written notice to that effect with the Court

within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Upon

receipt of such a filing by this Court, this matter will be

reopened and Defendant’s motion to dismiss will be reinstated.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

2

Case 4:15-cv-02244-MWB-JVW Document 11 Filed 08/01/16 Page 2 of 2
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDesign and Development of CubeSat Solar Array Deployment Mechanisms Using Shape Memory AlloysThe Advanced eLectrical Bus (ALBus) project is a technology demonstration mission of a 3-U CubeSat with an advanced, digitally controlled electrical power system capability and the novel use of Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) technology for reliable solar array deployable mechanisms. The ALBus cubesat has a need to deploy four solar arrays in addition to the body-mounted arrays on each side of the cubesat. A goal of the mission is to utilize the SMAs being developed at the NASA Glenn Research Center to deploy these solar arrays. The use of SMAs allows for the ability to test and reset the flight deployment mechanism prior to flight which reduces the risk of on orbit deployment failures common on cubesats. As a result, an SMA driven Retention and Release mechanism and an SMA driven hinge was designed, developed, and being prepared for flight. This paper summarized the development of these mechanisms, types and functionalities of SMAs used, and lessons learned throughout the process.Document ID20180004164Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGuzik, Allen T.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Benafan, Othmane*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 3, 2018Publication DateJune 1, 2018Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberE-19532GRC-E-DAA-TN54393NASA/TM-2018- 219914Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 934844.01.12.04.02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPortions of document may include copyright protected material.Keywordssolar array deploymentSMAcubesatAvailable DownloadsNameType20180004164.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 183 (Monday, September 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25197]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11:00 a.m., Friday, October 3, 1997.

Place: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Fl. Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-25197 Filed 9-18-97; 11:28 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```
#### Russell Lawrence YANKOW, Appellant, v. Helen Elizabeth YANKOW, Appellee.

No. 77-1489.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 14, 1978.

John W. Campbell, of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellant.

F. Wallace Pope, Jr., of Johnson, Blakely, Pope & Bokor, Clearwater, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The husband appeals from a final judgment of dissolution in which he was ordered to pay the wife $5,000 lump-sum alimony when he receives his inheritance of approximately $45,000 from his late father’s estate. The judgment further provided the *469husband is to pay the wife $50 per week until the estate is settled, at which time he must pay the balance still owing on the lump-sum award. Keeping in mind that the standard to be applied here is the wife’s need and the husband’s ability to pay, we find that the record demonstrates that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in making its award. Therefore we affirm. *Sisson v. Sisson,*336 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1976).

We note that the trial court has reserved jurisdiction to review the award after a period of six months from the date of final judgment. Though the record reveals the husband has sufficient income and savings to allow him to make the $50-per-week payments in the near future, this obligation may become burdensome if the estate does not close expeditiously. We are confident that upon proper petition the trial judge will make an adjustment of the requirement for weekly payments if the husband demonstrates an inability to make them.

Affirmed.

BOARDMAN, C. J, and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
# Maintaining strong partnerships in the Middle East

/ Published Sept. 25, 2018
BAHRAIN, 
The alliance of two coalition partners was reaffirmed when key leaders from the Department of Defense and Bahrain Defense Force signed an amendment to a fuel support agreement at Isa Airbase, Bahrain, Aug. 13. 

Defense Logistics Agency Energy Deputy Commander Guy Beougher, who was acting commander at the time, and Royal Bahraini Air Force 2nd Fighter Squadron Commander Col. Ahmed Al-Sisi signed the amendment to expand support beyond jet fuel to include ground fuel products and to update the invoice and payment procedures to improve accountability.

“The amendment signing was significant in that it enhances host nation support and will maintain a long-standing coalition in the Middle East,” Beougher said. “U.S. forces engaged in military operations have relied on host nation agreements to ensure expeditious logistics support. The strategic advantages of such alliances have become the cornerstone of our National Defense Strategy.” 

The core fuel support agreement between DLA Energy and RBAF was signed in 2013 and defines petroleum product support and related services to U.S. government entities on Isa Airbase to sustain the base and flight operations of U.S. Navy and Marine Corps aircraft.

The unified fuel amendment is in support of DoD objectives to strengthen alliances and attract new partners. It signifies the importance that DLA has placed on building strong partnerships with host nations, combatant commands, and coalition forces around the world.

The DLA Energy Middle East regional command supports warfighter fuel needs within the environment of the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility. Stretching across 14 different countries, the fuel supply chain is managed through 57 contracts valued at over $3.7 billion. Customers receive uninterrupted end-to-end logistical support encompassing the forecasting, planning, ordering, and monitoring of petroleum deliveries to invoice accountability. 

“One of the organization’s greatest support concentrations is sustaining the dynamic requirements for the ongoing Iraq and Afghanistan missions, Operation Inherent Resolve and Operation Freedom’s Sentinel,” said DLA Energy Middle East Commander Army Lt. Col. Henry Brown. “DLA Energy Middle East’s product and service support distinctively extends from the strategic to tactical level throughout the region.”

DLA Energy Middle East office is strategically situated in the Kingdom of Bahrain, a small country that has been a member of the United Nations since its independence from Britain in 1971. 

*About the author: Capt. Courtney Malone is from Crestview, Florida, and is assigned as a petroleum operations officer at DLA Energy Middle East, Naval Support Activity Bahrain.*
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Identity theft, what to know, what to do.**
 
2013 | 2016| 2018
 
SuDoc Number:FT 1.2:ID 2/8/
Item Number:0535 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000884298
 
September 17, 2018
**AMENDMENT TO LETTER OF INTENT**

 

WHEREAS:

A.         General Gold Corporation (the "General") and Gold Range LLC (the "Seller") entered into a Letter of Intent (the “Letter of Intent”) regarding the purchase of Independence Mines LLC; and

B.         The Purchaser and the Seller wish to revise the Letter of Intent as described in this Amendment to Letter of Intent.

NOW THEREFORE THIS AMENDMENT TO LETTER OF INTENT witnesses that, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
| 1. | The Letter of Intent is amended such that all references to the Closing Date are replaced with June 30, 2005, and specifically the relevant section is replaced with the following: |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

"Should General elect not to close within a reasonable period, at the conclusion of the Due Diligence period (by June 30, 2005), the work product generated shall be the sole property of the Seller, the Letter of Intent shall become null and void and have no further effect."
| 2. | The parties each acknowledge and agree that all other provisions of the Letter of Intent remain in full force and effect.                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 3. | This Amendment to Letter of Intent may be executed in several counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an original and all of which will together constitute one and the same instrument.                                                                                                              |
| 4. | Delivery of an executed copy of this Amendment to Letter of Intent by electronic facsimile transmission or other means of electronic communication capable of producing a printed copy will be deemed to be execution and delivery of this Amendment to Letter of Intent as of the date first set forth above. |

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendment to Letter of Intent as of the date written below.

**GENERAL GOLD CORPORATION**

 
| /S/ William Whittle |
|---------------------|

Name:  William Whittle
| Title: | President |
|--------|-----------|

 

**GOLD RANGE LLC**

 
| /S/ Robert Carrington |
|-----------------------|

Name:  Robert Carrington

 

The above terms are accepted this 31st day of December, 2004.

 

 

D/WLM/699150.1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00593-CR

Ramon Donato AYALA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 567926

Honorable Michael De Leon, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment 

is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings.

SIGNED September 23, 2020.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
No. 00-381.

#### City of Bridgeton *v.*Federal Aviation Administration et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2156 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

332 South Main Street in Flora, Illinois, as the ‘‘Robert T. Ferguson 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 21, 2005 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. OBAMA) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 332 South Main Street in Flora, Illinois, as 

the ‘‘Robert T. Ferguson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROBERT T. FERGUSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 332 South Main Street in Flora, 

6 Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Robert T. 

7 Ferguson Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2 

•S 2156 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert T. Ferguson 

3 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ
STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

### AIR RESOURCES BOARD

P. O. Box 2815 Sacramento, California 95812

February 5, 2002

ARB Staff Rule Review Results

To: Mr. Steven Moore, Senior Engineer San Diego County Air Pollution Control District Telephone Number: (858) 650-4598 e-mail: Steve.Mooore@sdcounty.ca.gov

From: Alex Krichevsky, (916) 324-6222 e-mail: akrichev@arb.ca.gov

The following rule, which was amended at a public h earing held by your District Board on December 21, 2001, was received by us on January 9, 2002, for our review:

Rule 67 Architectural Coatings

The Air Resources Board staff has reviewed the rule and, based on the information available to us at this time, we have no comments.

The rule was examined by the Stationary Source Divi sion, the Compliance Division, the Monitoring and Laboratory Division, and the Office of Legal Affairs.

If you have any questions, please contact me by e-m ail or at the telephone number

above.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48674]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24720]



[[Page 48674]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Thursday, September 25, 1997.

PLACE: Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, 1325 G Street, N.W., 
Suite 800, Board Room, Washington, D.C. 20005.

STATUS: Open.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jeffrey T. Bryson, General 
Counsel/Secretary 202/376-2441.

AGENDA: 

I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes:
    April 16, 1997 Annual Meeting
III. Resolution of Appreciation
IV. Budget Committee Report
    July 28, 1997 Meeting:
    a. FY 1997 Budget Reallocation Request
    b. FY 1998 Budget Request
    c. FY 1999 OMB Budget Submission
V. Audit Committee Report
VI. Treasurer's Report
VII. Appointment of Acting Treasurer
VIII. Executive Director's Quarterly Management Report
IX. Adjourn
Jeffrey T. Bryson,
General Counsel/Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24720 Filed 9-12-97; 2:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570-01-M
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0060

SAT Date: 11/20/2012

Print Date: 9/30/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2-3 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 1 2 PMN

1 1 2

1 1 1

1 1 2

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR/CORROSION-E,S,MM,L, 

UNCERT-SENS-DERMAL/RESPIRATORY, DEVEL, REPRO, ONCO, MUTA, 

AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0060

FATE: 

log Kow = 3.87 (E)

log Koc = 1.87 (E)

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)

log Fish BAF = 2.46 (E)

FATE: 
log Kow = 2.76 (M)

log Koc = 1.50 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.49 (E)

log Fish BAF = 1.67 (E)

FATE: 

log Kow = 1.99 (E)

log Koc = 1.60 (E)

log Fish BCF = 0.98 (E)

log Fish BAF = 1.00 (E)

PMN Substance: Solid 

S = Reacts

Hydrolysis Half-life = min-hrs

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = ; then 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt neodecanoic acid wk; Hyd Pdt isobutane 

wk; Hyd Pdt butadiene wk

Sorption to soils/sediments = 

Hyd Pdt butadiene low

PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; ; 

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = 

 negl; 

 Health:

 Health Summary: Expect absorption and reaction all routes based on 

physical/chemical properties. The PMN material hydrolyzes rapidly with water and releases 

, . Based on the reactivity, the PMN 

material is expected to be a strong irritant and possibly corrosive to all exposed tissues. There is 

concern for developmental toxicity for if the branching occurs at t he alpha 

carbon. There is also concern for developmental toxicity, reproductive toxicity, oncogenicity, 

and mutagenicity and uncertain concern for dermal and respiratory sensitization for 

e. has a RfC of 0.002 mg/m3 for inhalation exposure based on 

ovarian atrophy and a slope factor of 3E-5 per ug/m3 based on the incidence of leukemia in 

humans (IRIS). NTP found clear evidence of carcinogenicity in mice when exposed via 

inhalation ). NTP also found fetal growth retardation, decreased 

placental weights, and increased incidences of morphologic variations and maternal toxicity in a 

developmental toxicity from an inhalation study in mice with a LOEL of 40 ppb (NTP 

). Moderate high concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 0.77

daphnid 48-h LC50 1.2

green algal 96-h EC50 15

fish _ chronic value 0.079

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.28

algal _ chronic 

value

3.6

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neodymium compounds; SAR 

chemical class = effective 

concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <180.0 

mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

8

SARs neodymium compounds

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2798 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to clarify land eligible for enrollment 

in the conservation reserve program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023 

Mr. WELCH (for himself and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to clarify land 

eligible for enrollment in the conservation reserve program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Building Up Farmland 

5 Frontiers for Ecological Resilience Act’’ or the ‘‘BUFFER 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. ELIGIBLE LAND UNDER THE CONSERVATION RE8 SERVE PROGRAM. 

9 Section 1231(b) of the Food Security Act of 1985 

10 (16 U.S.C. 3831(b)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2798 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (6)(B)(ii), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (7)(C), by striking the period 

4 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(8) land that is otherwise eligible for enroll7 ment and for which a Tribal, State, or other local 

8 law, ordinance, or other regulation requires any re9 source-conserving or environmental protection meas10 ure or practice, unless the requirement to implement 

11 such a measure or practice has been imposed by an 

12 administrative order or a court order, in which case 

13 that land shall not be eligible for enrollment.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB