USA Banner
  U.S. flag
              An official website of the United States government Here's how you knowOfficial US Government Icon
              **Official websites use .gov**A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
            Secure Site Icon
              **Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
                  A **lock** ( A locked padlock ) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. 
 U.S. Department of Transportation Icon United States Department of Transportation
 Search DOT
            Search
                    About FHWAFHWA Organization
                Headquarters Offices
                Field Offices
                Strategic Plan
                Business Opportunities
                Staff Directories
                Careers
                Highway History
                Contact UsProgramsAcquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                Safety
                Browse by TopicsResourcesCore Highway Topics
                Federal Aid Essentials
                Automation
                Complete Streets
                Laws and Regulations
                Policy & Guidance Center
                Section 508
                Publications and Statistics
                Professional Development
                National Highway Institute
                Resource Center
                Accessibility Resource Library
                FHWA Research LibraryNewsroomPress Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Photos
                Videos
                Media ContactsMenu FHWA Highway Safety Programs Home
                        HSIP Noteworthy Practice Series


            
            In This Section
        Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
                                Overview
                About
                Planning
                Implementing
                Evaluating
                Reporting
                Noteworthy Practices
                Legislation and Guidance
                Resources
                HSIP Special Rules
                Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)
                                Overview
                About
                Develop
                Implement
                Evaluate
                Promote
                Legislation and Guidance
                Resources
                Noteworthy Practices
                Safety Performance Measure
                                Overview
                State Safety Performance Targets
                Policy & Guidance
                Fact Sheets & Informational Webinars
                Target-Setting Resources
                Safety Data Resources
                State Safety Reports
                Safety Contacts
                Technical Assistance & Training
                Railway Highway Crossing Program
                                Overview
                Policy and Guidance
                Resources
                
                HSIP Project Identification
States are required (23 U.S.C. 148) to perform safety project identification and analysis as part of the HSIP. However, the law does not specify the methodologies states shall use. The HSIP Manual (FHWA-SA-09-029) outlines the following steps for project identification: collect and analyze data; identify crash types and contributing factors; establish a crash pattern; conduct field reviews; identify countermeasures; assess countermeasure effectiveness; and use the current science (e.g., crash modification factors) to determine and prioritize project selection. The goal is to use data-driven decision making to identify and prioritize projects with the greatest potential for reducing deaths and serious injuries on all public roadways.

In practice, methods used to identify candidate project locations vary significantly from state to state. Many states identify potential locations for safety improvements based on crash frequency or rate, while some have begun to use more advanced methods that incorporate safety performance functions (SPFs) or the Empirical Bayes (EB) method. In addition, some states are changing focus from “hot spot” improvements to a systemic approach. Qualitative information commonly used to identify candidate safety projects include panel reviews, input from public and law enforcement, field reviews, and road safety audits (RSA).

Some state departments of transportation (DOT) select projects at the state level while others distribute funds to DOT District offices to use at each district’s discretion. Many states selecting projects at the state level solicit projects from DOT District offices and local agencies for consideration. States commonly conduct benefit-cost analyses to select and prioritize projects and rank them first using the highest benefit-cost ratio or net present value.

One of the biggest challenges to effective project identification is the lack of data, particularly for local roadways. Even when quality data are available, many states do not have the training, resources, or tools to apply the more advanced and rigorous data analysis methods necessary to use them effectively. In addition, competing political or institutional realities could impose non-data driven factors on the decision-making process, making it difficult to select those HSIP projects with the greatest potential to improve safety.

While many considerations enter into project selection, quantitative analysis should be used whenever possible in the prioritization process (e.g., comparing cost, effectiveness, and lifespan of the project). Quantitative information lends objectivity to the decision making process and helps maximize the safety benefit for the resources invested.

Noteworthy Practices

The following cases demonstrate noteworthy practices several states are using in HSIP project identification:

The North Carolina DOT (NCDOT) developed four categories of safety warrants used in the network screening process to identify locations with severe crashes and crash patterns that can be addressed by engineering safety countermeasures. To provide a clear and consistent data-driven process, NCDOT developed a decision support tool to perform the initial prioritization of all candidate safety projects from across the state. (read more)
	The Missouri DOT (MoDOT) made the state’s HSIP more proactive through the systemwide implementation of engineering strategies described in Missouri’s Blueprint to Arrive Alive (Strategic Highway Safety Plan). Using HSIP funds, MoDOT incorporates the installation of rumble strips/stripes, improved signing and delineation, wider pavement markings, and improved shoulders into pavement resurfacing projects. Since 2007, almost two-thirds of MoDOT’s HSIP funds have been allocated to systemic improvements, resulting in a safer system overall. (read more)
	The Minnesota DOT (MnDOT) restructured its HSIP to provide funding for local agencies to address the large proportion of severe crashes occurring on local roadways, and developed funding goals for proactive and reactive improvements. MnDOT developed a “proactive spectrum” to establish safety funding goals for the Metropolitan District (Minneapolis/St. Paul area) and rural districts. Minnesota has successfully increased the proportion of safety funding spent on proactive improvements. Almost 90 percent of projects programmed for fiscal year 2010-2011 are proactive. (read more)
	The Illinois DOT (IDOT), with the assistance of the University of Illinois, developed safety performance functions (SPFs) for all state routes and intersections using the Empirical Bayes (EB) method. IDOT uses the SPFs in the network screening process to identify locations with the highest potential for safety improvement. The use of SPFs in the network screening process enables the state to shift emphasis of the HSIP away from focusing on urban densely populated areas. The resulting broader focus includes low-cost safety improvements or systemic improvements that may not have been identified using previous screening methods. (read more)
	The Colorado DOT (CDOT) developed sophisticated predictive and diagnostic tools that incorporate calibrated SPFs for all public roadway types and intersections in the state. These tools enable CDOT to maximize potential crash reduction in the state within the constraints of available budgets. CDOT institutionalized the use of these tools by applying them to all CDOT projects. Over the seven years of applying these methods on all infrastructure projects, the state has achieved an unprecedented fatal crash reduction of 36 percent. (read more)To access these full case studies, click on the individual links above or visit the FHWA Office of Safety on-line at: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/safety/legislative-safety-programs/hsip.
      
  Safety Warrants and Spot Safety Index – North Carolina
                Implementation of Systemwide Improvements – Missouri
                Funding Goals for Proactive Improvements – Minnesota
                Development of SPFs for All State Routes and Intersections – Illinois
                Level of Service of Safety and Diagnostic Analysis – ColoradoBook traversal links for HSIP Project Identification
      ‹ HSIP Noteworthy Practice Series
                    Up
                    Safety Warrants and Spot Safety Index – North Carolina ›
                
                Book:HSIP Noteworthy Practice Series
              HSIP Project Identification
                                Safety Warrants and Spot Safety Index – North Carolina
                Implementation of Systemwide Improvements – Missouri
                Funding Goals for Proactive Improvements – Minnesota
                Development of SPFs for All State Routes and Intersections – Illinois
                Level of Service of Safety and Diagnostic Analysis – Colorado
                HSIP Project Evaluation
                                Project Evaluations Using Empirical Bayes – Colorado
                Crash Reduction Analysis System Hub – Florida
                Safety Evaluation Group – North Carolina
                University Conducting HSIP Project Evaluations Using Empirical Bayes – Wisconsin
                Safety Data Collection, Analysis, and Sharing
                                Law Enforcement Expert for Improved Data Collection – Louisiana
                Data Analysis for County Highway Safety Plans – Minnesota
                Data Sharing and Decision Support Tool – New Jersey
                SHSP Stakeholder Involvement
                                Statewide and Regional SHSP Coalitions – Missouri
                SHSP Road Shows – Nevada
                Engaging Native American Tribes in the SHSP – Washington
                MPO Safety Management Planning – Cheyenne, Wyoming
                Revisiting SHSP Emphasis Areas
                                Focusing on Fewer Emphasis Areas – West Virginia
                Tiered Emphasis Areas for Statewide and County Safety Planning – Washington
                Speeding and Aggressive Driving and Distracted Driving Task Forces – Louisiana
                Use of the HSIP Flexible Funding Provision
                                Alabama Flexes HSIP Funds for Increased Enforcement – Alabama
                Michigan Uses HSIP Flex Funds for Winter Safe Driving Campaign – Michigan
                Nevada Funds Education and Outreach Programs with HSIP Flex Funds – Nevada
                Utah Flexes HSIP Funds to Enhance Partners’ Safety Efforts – Utah
                SHSP – Leadership that Saves Lives
                SHSP – Get Involved! U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

**Federal Highway Administration**

1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE

WASHINGTON, DC 20590

202-366-4000Subscribe to email updates
                    About
  

        
              About FHWA
                Careers
                Org Chart
                Staff Directories
                Work with UsPrograms
  

        
              Acquisition Management
                Civil Rights
                Federal Lands Highway
                Infrastructure
                Innovative Program Delivery
                Operations
                Planning, Environment, and Realty
                Policy
                Research, Development, and Technology
                SafetyPolicies, Rights, Legal
  

        
              About DOT
                Accessibility
                Budget and Performance
                Civil Rights
                FOIA
                Information Quality
                No FEAR Act
                Office of Inspector General
                Privacy Policy
                USA.gov
                Web Policies and Notices
                Web StandardsNews & Events
  

        
              Newsroom
                Press Releases
                Speeches & Testimony
                Media Contacts
                Connect with Us