46774 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 171 / Thursday, September 4, 1997 / Notices

Number of respondents × Frequency of

response × Hours per response × =Burden hours

Public Housing Agencies ........................................................... 3,230 1 1 3,230

Indian Housing Authorities ......................................................... 170 1 1 170

Total Estimated Burden Hours: 3,400.

Status: Reinstatement, with changes.

Contact: Bill Popmarkoff, HUD, (202)

708–3642 x4130, Joseph F. Lackey, Jr.,

OMB, (202) 395–7316.

Dated: August 27, 1997.

[FR Doc. 97–23467 Filed 9–3–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[NV–020–1430–10]

Notice of Availability of Plan

Amendment

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,

Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land

Management, Winnemucca District, has

completed an Environmental

Assessment/Finding of No Significant

Impact of the Proposed Plan

Amendments to the Paradise-Denio and

Sonoma-Gerlach Management

Framework Plans.

DATES: The protest period for these

Proposed Plan Amendments will

commence with the date of publication

of this notice and last 30 days. Protests

must be received on or before October

3, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Protests must be addressed

to the Director, Bureau of Land

Management, Attn: Ms. Brenda

Williams, Protests Manager (WO 210),

1849 C Street NW/LS–1075,

Washington, DC 20240, within 30 days

after the date of publication of this

Notice of Availability.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Figarelle, Lands Specialist,

Winnemucca District Office, 5100 E.

Winnemucca Boulevard, Winnemucca,

Nevada 89445, (702) 623–1500.

Copies of the Environmental

Assessment and Proposed Plan

Amendments are available for review at

the Winnemucca District Office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This

action is announced pursuant to section

202(a) of the Federal Land Policy and

Management Act of 1976 and 43 CFR

part 1610. The Proposed Amendments

are subject to protest from any party

who has participated in the planning

process. Protests must be specific and

contain the following information:

• The name, mailing address, phone

number, and interest of the person filing

the protest.

• A statement of the issue(s) being

protested.

• A statement of the part(s) of the

proposed amendment being protested

and citing pages, paragraphs, maps etc.,

of the Proposed Amendment.

• A copy of all documents addressing

the issue(s) submitted by the protestor

during the planning process or a

reference to the date when the protester

discussed the issue(s) for the record.

• A concise statement as to why the

protester believes the BLM State

Director is incorrect.

Dated: August 25, 1997.

Ron Wenker,

District Manager.

[FR Doc. 97–23262 Filed 9–3–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–HC–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of July, 1997.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–33,546; Gould Pump (PA), Inc.,

Ashland, PA

TA–W–33,498; Flextronics International

USA, Inc., Richardson, TX

TA–W–33,595; Continental Sprayers,

Inc., El Paso, TX

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

TA–W–33,569; EG&G Instruments, Inc.,

Princeton Applied Research Div.,

Trenton, NJ

TA–W–33,622; Lightolier, Compton, CA

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–33,633; A.K. Stampings Co., Inc.,

Mountainside, NJ

TA–W–33,608, TA–W–33,609, TA–W–

33,610 & TA–W–33,611; Occidental

Oil & Gas Corp. Headquartered &

Operating in Bakersfield, CA & at

Various Locations Throughout the

Following States; OK, KS and TX

The investigation revealed that

criteria (2) and criteria (3) have not been

met. Sales or production did not decline

during the relevant period as required

for certification. Increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have not

contributed importantly to the

separations or threat thereof, and the

absolute decline in sales or production.

TA–W–33,536; Tenneco Packaging,

Rittman, OH

TA–W–33,615; Heat-N-Glo, Savage, MN

TA–W–33,605; Goss Graphics Systems,

Wyomissing, PA

TA–W–33,650; Quo Vadis, Inc., a

Division of Quo Vadis France,

Hamburg, NY

TA–W–33,638; Lucas-Varity Dayton

Welther Portsmouth Casting Center,

Portsmouth, OH