Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 1997 / Notices 49685

of National Drug Control Policy,

Executive Office of the President,

Washington, D.C. 20503; 202–395–6755.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1990,

the Director of ONDCP designated the

first five HIDTAs. These original

HIDTAs, areas through which most

illegal drugs enter the United States, are

the Southwest Border, Houston, Los

Angeles, New York/New Jersey, and

South Florida. In 1994, the Director

designated the Washington/Baltimore

HIDTA to address the extensive drug

distribution networks serving hardcore

drug users. Also in 1994, the Director

designated Puerto Rico/U.S. Virgin

Islands as a HIDTA based on the

significant amount of drugs entering the

United States through this region. In

1995, the Director designated three more

HIDTAs in Atlanta, Chicago, and

Philadelphia/Camden to target drug

abuse and drug trafficking in those

areas.

Five additional HIDTAs were

designated on December 20, 1996. These

are: the Gulf Coast HIDTA (includes

parts of Alabama, Louisiana, and

Mississippi); the Lake County, Indiana

HIDTA, the Midwest HIDTA (includes

parts of Iowa, Kansas, Missouri,

Nebraska, and South Dakota, with focus

on methamphetamine); the Northwest

HIDTA (includes seven counties of

Washington State); and the Rocky

Mountain HIDTA (includes parts of

Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming).

The program supports more than 160

collocated officer/agent task forces;

strengthens mutually supporting local,

State, and Federal drug trafficking and

money laundering task forces; bolsters

information analysis and sharing

networks; and, improves integration of

law enforcement, drug treatment and

drug abuse prevention programs. The

states and counties included in the two

new HIDTAs are:

(1) Southeastern Michigan—The

following Michigan counties: Wayne,

Oakland, Macomb, and Washtenaw.

(2) San Francisco Bay Area—The

following California counties: Alameda,

Contra Costa, Lake, Marin, Monterey,

San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara,

Santa Cruz, and Sonoma.

Signed at Washington, D.C. this 10th day

of September, 1997.

Barry R. McCaffrey,

Director.

[FR Doc. 97–25162 Filed 9–22–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3180–02–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Notice of Public Information

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the

Federal Communications Commission

September 15, 1997.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications

Commission, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork burden

invites the general public and other

Federal agencies to take this

opportunity to comment on the

following information collection(s), as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An

agency may not conduct or sponsor a

collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid control

number. No person shall be subject to

any penalty for failing to comply with

a collection of information subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that

does not display a valid control number.

Comments are requested concerning (a)

whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance

the quality, utility, and clarity of the

information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on the respondents,

including the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology.

DATES: Written comments should be

submitted on or before November 24,

1997. If you anticipate that you will be

submitting comments, but find it

difficult to do so within the period of

time allowed by this notice, you should

advise the contact listed below as soon

as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to Judy

Boley, Federal Communications

Commissions, Room 234, 1919 M St.,

NW., Washington, DC 20554 or via

internet to jboley@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy

Boley at 202–418–0214 or via internet at

jboley@fcc.gov.

OMB Approval No.: 3060–0192.

Title: Section 87.103, Posting station

license.

Form No.: N/A.

Type of Review: Extension of a

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; individuals or

households; state, local or tribal

government, not-for-profit institutions.

Number of Respondents: 47,800.

Estimated Hour Per Response: .250

hours per response.

Frequency of Response:

Recordkeeping requirement.

Cost to Respondents: N/A.

Estimated Total Annual Burden:

11,950 hours.

Needs and Uses: The recordkeeping

requirement contained in Section

87.103 is necessary to demonstrate that

all transmitters in the Aviation Service

are properly licensed in accordance

with the requirements of Section 201 of

the Communications Act of 1934, as

amended, 47 U.S.C. 301, No. 2020 of the

International Radio Regulations, and

Article 30 of the Convention on

International Civil Aviation. This

requirement is necessary so that quick

resolution of any harmful interference

problems can be achieved and to ensure

that the station is operating in

accordance with the appropriate rules,

statutes, and treaties.

Federal Communications Commission.

Shirley Suggs,

Chief, Publications Branch.

[FR Doc. 97–25123 Filed 9–22–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–F

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Notice of Public Information

Collection(s) Being Reviewed by the

Federal Communications Commission

for Extension Under Delegated

Authority 5 CFR 1320 Authority,

Comments Requested

September 17, 1997.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications

Commission, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork burden

invites the general public and other

Federal agencies to take this

opportunity to comment on the

following information collection(s), as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An

agency may not conduct or sponsor a

collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid control

number. No person shall be subject to

any penalty for failing to comply with

a collection of information subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that

does not display a valid control number.

Comments are requested concerning (a)

whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance