alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24094]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3788-000]


Anker Power Services, Inc.; Notice of Filing

August 29, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 11, 1997, Anker Power Services, Inc., 
tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before September 11, 1997. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24094 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2876 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to cancel existing school meal debt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 

Mr. FETTERMAN (for himself, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and Mr. WELCH) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to cancel existing 

school meal debt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘School Lunch Debt 

5 Cancellation Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CANCELLATION OF SCHOOL MEAL DEBT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

8 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture 

9 shall cancel and eliminate all debts owed by households 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2876 IS

1 as of the date of enactment of this Act for school meals 

2 under— 

3 (1) the school lunch program established under 

4 the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act 

5 (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.); and 

6 (2) the school breakfast program under section 

7 4 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 

8 1773). 

9 (b) PAYMENT OF CANCELLED DEBT.—The Secretary 

10 shall use the funds of the Commodity Credit Corporation 

11 to pay the amount of debt cancelled under subsection (a) 

12 to each local educational authority to which the debt is 

13 owed by the applicable households. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
# Službeni list C 140I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 140I |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 64.21. travnja 2021. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 140I

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 64.21. travnja 2021.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | Ispravci |
| | Ispravak objave Europske agencije za sigurnost i zdravlje na radu (EU-OSHA), Bilbao – Objava slobodnog radnog mjesta izvršnog direktora (Privremeno osoblje – razred AD 14) – COM/2020/20049 ( Službeni list Europske unije C 171 A od 19. svibnja 2020 .) | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

Ispravci

Ispravak objave Europske agencije za sigurnost i zdravlje na radu (EU-OSHA), Bilbao – Objava slobodnog radnog mjesta izvršnog direktora (Privremeno osoblje – razred AD 14) – COM/2020/20049 ( Službeni list Europske unije C 171 A od 19. svibnja 2020 .)

( Službeni list Europske unije C 171 A od 19. svibnja 2020 .)

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

Ispravci

| 21.4.2021 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CI 140/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2021

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CI 140/1

---

Ispravak objave Europske agencije za sigurnost i zdravlje na radu (EU-OSHA), Bilbao – Objava slobodnog radnog mjesta izvršnog direktora (Privremeno osoblje – razred AD 14) – COM/2020/20049

(
  Službeni list Europske unije C 171 A od 19. svibnja 2020
  .)

(2021/C 140 I/01)

Na stranici 4., šesti odlomak:

umjesto:

„Prije nego što Upravni odbor imenuje jednog od kandidata koji su ušli u uži izbor, kandidati će se morati obratiti nadležnim tijelima Vijeća i Odbora Europskog parlamenta te odgovarati na pitanja. Europski parlament i Vijeće Europske unije nakon toga će dati svoje mišljenje i navesti redoslijed prednosti; Upravni odbor imenovat će izvršnog direktora uzimajući u obzir ova mišljenja.”;

treba stajati:

„Odabranog kandidata poziva se da podnese izjavu pred Europskim parlamentom i da odgovori na pitanja zastupnika u Europskom parlamentu.”.

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF REZNICK GROUP, P.C., INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3and related prospectuses (Registration Nos. 333-115316, 333-108380,333-91548, 333-64732 and 333-60076) and on Form S-8(Registration Nos. 333-116276, 333-91544, 333-64166, 333-90489,and 333-42803) of VCampus Corporation of our report dated March 11,2005 (except for note 15 at to which the date is March 30, 2005) withrespect to the 2003 and 2004 financial statements and schedule of VCampusCorporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K).
| /s/ REZNICK  GROUP, P.C. |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Bethesda, Maryland       |   |
| March 30, 2005      |   |

 

----
#### Kirby David SUTTON, III, Appellant, v. Eeva Sutton MOLASSO, Appellee.

No. K-447.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

July 31, 1969.

*436Robert G. Alexander, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Robert W. Elrod, Tallahassee, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Kirby David Sutton, III, the natural father of Kirby David Sutton, IV, appeals from an order awarding custody of the parties’ seven-year-old son to his former wife, Eeva Sutton Molasso.

The basic point on appeal is whether the court abused its discretion in modifying its previous order.

Extensive testimony was adduced before the trial judge in support of the instant petition to modify. The parties were divorced in 1965 at which time custody of the child was awarded to the mother, Eeva, with visitation rights to the father, who was in the Armed Forces. Subsequently, Eeva married an individual of ill repute and as a result the child was exposed to an environment which was not conducive to his well-being. Appellant petitioned for award of custody which was denied by the court upon the condition that the child would not be brought in contact with Eeva’s second husband who was then in jail. Eeva later resumed cohabitation with her husband and concurrently therewith delivered the child to his paternal grandparents in accordance with the custody order. During the two years the child lived with his grandparents, Eeva obtained a divorce, married a man of good repute, established a home, and then filed this petition for custody.

The trial judge in his review of the instant case found that such a change in circumstances had occurred as to the personal life and home conditions on the part of the mother so as to require a change in custody from the grandparents to Eeva. The modification order contains liberal visitation rights to the grandparents for the months of June, July and August, and during the weekends for the rest of the year.

We find from the record substantial credible evidence to support the trial judge’s conclusion in this matter of broad discretion as to what is best for the welfare of the child, and we will not attempt to substitute our judgment for that of the Chancellor.

Affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,309,026
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,776,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 17,200,602
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      17,200,602
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        17,200,602
<LOANS>                                     54,164,630
<ALLOWANCE>                                    740,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              82,572,113
<DEPOSITS>                                  71,851,638
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            343,351
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,338,611
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,038,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              82,572,113
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,123,591
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              948,712
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               206,532
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,278,835
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,708,856
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,737,120
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,541,715
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  263,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              23,912
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,608,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,200,193
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   844,306
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.20
<LOANS-NON>                                     80,652
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                237,878
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               696,679
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  233,156
<RECOVERIES>                                    14,094
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              740,617
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        740,617
        

</TABLE>
#### Ronald TILLERY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-584.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 8, 1970.

*30Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael N. Kavouklis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

MANN, Judge.

The Public Defender for the Twelfth Circuit filed a notice of appeal designating correctly the title of the court, the style of the cause, including its correct file number, from which the appeal is taken, the title of the court to which the appeal is taken, the name and designation of the appealing party, and the name and designation of the opposing party, all of which F.A.R. 3.2, 32 F.S.A. requires. But he incorrectly described the judgment appealed from as an “Order Denying Defendant’s Request for Relief Under Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 1.850,” and did not state the date of its rendition, the date and book and page of the public record in which it is recorded. After the thirty-day period had elapsed he filed a “Corrected Notice of Appeal” giving the date of the judgment and describing it as a “Judgment and Sentence” but still failing to give the book and page number.

While we do not condone sloppy practice in law offices, particularly where the rights of accused persons are jeopardized, F.A.R. 3.2(c) clearly states that “Deficiencies in form or substance in the notice of appeal shall not be jurisdictional and shall not be ground for dismissal of the appeal itnless it be clearly shown that the complaining party was misled or prejudiced by such deficiencies.” The Attorney General’s motion does not even allege prejudice. The only consequence of granting the motion in any event could be unnecessary work for lawyers and judges alike: Tillery would have a clear right to appellate review on habeas corpus under Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239.

Dismissal of appeals for procedural irregularity is contrary to the policy of our rules. See City of Gainesville v. Thomas, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 833. Thus the author’s comment to F.A.R. 6.2 is misleading when it states that “even the most meritorious appeal in a criminal cause *may*be dismissed if a defective notice of appeal is not amended within the prescribed period within which jurisdiction can be conferred upon the appellate court.” 32 F.S.A. pp. 366-367. It is wrong to read “may” as “must.”

Motion denied.

HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE, J., concur.
#### James Willie GRAYER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-360.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 20, 1971.

James Willie Grayer, in pro. per.

*97Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Alan M. Medof, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order of the trial court, entered after an evidentiary hearing, denying the appellant’s fourth motion filed under Rule 1.850 CrPR, 33 F.S.A., for relief from a conviction for statutory rape. The indictment on which conviction was based charged the defendant with having committed statutory rape upon a child under 10 years of age, who was shown to have been his daughter. Initially the defendant pleaded not guilty. When called to trial he changed his plea to guilty. He was so adjudged, and was given a life sentence which he is now serving.

The grounds presented on the present motion for relief under Rule 1.850 CrPR are that his plea of guilty was improperly accepted by the court and was not voluntary, and that he was not properly represented by counsel in connection therewith. Upon examining the record of the proceedings held in the trial court on this motion for relief, we conclude that the trial judge was eminently correct in denying the motion. The same grounds were asserted and rejected on a prior motion. That ruling was appealed, and was affirmed by this court. See Grayer v. State, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 765. Moreover, regarding the contention of the appellant that his guilty plea was not voluntary, the record of the proceedings of the circuit court, at the time of the change of plea by the defendant from not guilt to guilty, shows that the trial court made a searching inquiry as to the voluntariness thereof, in the course of which the significance and legal effect of the plea were duly made known to the defendant. See Garcia v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 300.

Affirmed.
#### John SULLIVAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-192.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

April 22, 1969.

Habeas corpus denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25219]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United 
States v. Atlantic Richfield Co., Civil No. 3-91-CV-248, was lodged on 
August 27, 1997, with the United States District Court for the District 
of Connecticut. The decree resolves claims against Litton Systems, Inc. 
in the above-referenced action under the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), for 
contamination at the Laurel Park Landfill Superfund Site in the Borough 
of Naugatuck, Connecticut (the ``Site''). In the proposed consent 
decree, the settling defendant agrees to reimburse the United States 
for $30,000 in past response costs incurred by the Environmental 
Protection Agency at the Site, and to reimburse the State of 
Connecticut $6,000 for past State costs. The Consent Decree includes a 
covenant not to sue by the United States under Sections 106 and 107 of 
CERCLA.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Atlantic Richfield Co., DOJ Ref. Number 90-11-2-703.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, Connecticut Financial Center, 157 Church St., 
New Haven, CT 06510, the New England Region Office of the Environmental 
Protection Agency, JFK Federal Building, Boston, MA 02203-2211; and at 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent decree may 
be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 
G Street, N.W. 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy, 
please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount 
of $8.00 for the Consent Decree (25 cents per page reproduction costs), 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Bruce S. Gelber,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-25219 Filed 9-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
1

Opinion issued October 6 , 2015

In The



## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 15

- 00685

- CV

——————————— IN RE AMY WILLIAMS , Relat or

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION *

Relator
, Amy Williams, seeks mandamus relief from two orders signed July

30, 2015, one temporarily terminating the writ of withholding until October 2,

2015, and the other reinstating the writ on October 2, 2015.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied . All pending motions are

denied as moot

.

* The un derlying case is In the Interest of G .N.H. , A Child , in the 309th District Court of Harris County, Cause No. 703024.2 PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FTD
CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,468
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,681
<INVENTORY>                                     13,641
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,055
<PP&E>                                          49,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,340
<BONDS>                                         51,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,074
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,697
<SALES>                                         53,627
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               213,433
<CGS>                                           36,949
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  202,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,699
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,890
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,045
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,192
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                853
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,714)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,861)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50391-50392]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25428]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health (NIH)


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Meeting of the Board of 
Scientific Counselors, National Institute on Aging

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute on Aging, 
October 21-23, 1997 to be held at the Gerontology Research Center, 
Baltimore, Maryland. On Wednesday, October 22, the meeting will be open 
to the public for the review

[[Page 50392]]

of the Laboratory of Biological Chemistry from 8:20 a.m. until 12:00 
noon; and from 1:00 until 4:30 p.m. On Thursday, October 23, the 
meeting will be open to the public for the review of the Laboratory of 
Neurosciences--Brain Aging Dementia Section from 8:30 until 11:30 a.m. 
and from 12:30 to 3:00 p.m. Attendance by the public will be limited to 
space available.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in sec. 552b(c)(6), 
Title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the meeting will be 
closed to the public on Tuesday, October 21, from 8:00 p.m. to recess; 
Wednesday, October 22, from 8:00 to 8:20 a.m.; from 12:00 noon to 1:00 
p.m.; and from 4:30 to 5:00 p.m.; and Thursday, October 23, from 8:00 
to a 8:30 a.m.; from 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.; and from 3:00 p.m. until 
adjournment for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual 
programs and projects conducted by the National Institute on Aging, 
(NIA), including consideration of personnel qualifications and 
performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Ms. June McCann, Committee Management Officer, NIA, Gateway 
Building, Room 2C218, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301/496-9322), will provide a summary of the meeting and a 
roster of committee members upon request.
    Dr. Dan L. Longo, Scientific Director, NIA, Gerontology Research 
Center, 4940 Eastern Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21224 will furnish 
substantive program information.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact the Scientific Director in advance of the meeting.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: September 18, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-25428 Filed 9-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M