alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Annual Report of Ministry Partners Investment Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Stephen A. Ballas, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: March 25, 2003 | MINISTRY PARTNERS INVESTMENT CORPORATION                                            
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                                                     
|                      | By: /s/ Stephen A. BallasStephen A. Ballas
President and Principal Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ORVILLE MORRISON, AKA Orville

David Morrison,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 18

- 35931

D.C. Nos. 1:16

- cv

- 00099

- SPW

1:04

- cr

- 00126

- SPW

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 6, 2022

Submission Withd rawn December 12, 2022

Resubmitted F ebruary 1, 2024

Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, CHRISTEN, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Orville Morrison appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we

affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3. 

# FILED

FEB 1 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

In 2004, Morrison shot and killed William Wick

. Following a jury trial,

Morrison was convicted of voluntary manslaughter , in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 1112(a)

, and of using a firearm during and in r elation to a crime of violence , in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

. In 2016, Morrison filed a s ection 2255 motion

seeking relief on the theory that voluntary manslaughter d oes not constitute a crime

of violence under s ection 924(c)

. The district court denied relief , concluding that

the motion was untimely

. “ We review de novo the district court ’ s denial of a

§ 2255 motion .” U

nited States v. Fultz , 923 F.3d 1192, 1194 (9th Cir. 2019)

.

On appeal , the United States expressly waived any argument that Morrison’s

motion was untimely, instead arguing that his claim fails on the merits. After

hearing oral argument, w e withdrew submission pending the issuance of the

mandate in United States v. Draper

, 8 4 F.4th 797 (9th Cir. 2023)

. Th e mandate has

now issued. In Draper , t he court held that voluntary manslaughter under s ection

1112(a) is a crime of violence under s ection 924(c)

. Id. at 80 7 . That holding

resolves this case

. Because voluntary manslaughter is a crime of violence , the

district court did not err in denying Morrison’s s ection 2255 motion

.

A FFIRMED

.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

v.

PHILLIP WAYNE WRIGHT *

*

*

*

* IN THE

SUPREME COURT

OF MARYLAND

AG Docket No. 8

September Term, 20 22

O R D E R

Upon c onsideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent, i t is this 21st

day of April , 202 3 , by the Supreme Court of Maryland,

ORDERED that the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent is GRANTED; and it

is further

ORDERED that effective June 7, 2023, the Respondent, Phillip Wayne Wright

, is

disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for violations of Rules 1.1, 1.2,

1.3, 1.4, 1.16, 3.2, 3.4, 8.1, and 8.4(a), (c), and (d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct;

and it is further

OR DERED that on June 7, 2023, the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of

Phillip Wayne Wright from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the

Trustees of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all clerks of all j udicial

tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19

- 761(b)

.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

Chief Ju stice
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




Remote
      Dynamics, Inc.


Richardson,
      Texas




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-3 (No.’s 333-71340, 333-57281 and 333-120769) and Form S-8 (No.’s 333-2914,
      333-71342 and 333-137345) of Remote Dynamics, Inc. of our report dated January
      9, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in
      the
      Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference in this Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding
      the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.




/s/
                KBA Group LLPDallas,
                TexasJanuary
                16, 2007
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2686 

To require the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a study 

on the economic impact and health outcomes associated with the response 

to the COVID–19 pandemic in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2023 

Mr. BRAUN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To require the Comptroller General of the United States 

to conduct a study on the economic impact and health 

outcomes associated with the response to the COVID– 

19 pandemic in the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ASSESSMENT OF COVID–19 MITIGATION POLI4 CIES. 

5 (a) GAO STUDY.—The Comptroller General of the 

6 United States shall conduct a study on the economic im7 pact and health outcomes associated with the response to 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2686 IS

1 the COVID–19 pandemic in the United States. Such study 

2 shall include— 

3 (1) a summary of strategies used by local gov4 ernmental entities, States, and the Federal Govern5 ment to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID– 

6 19 during the public health emergency declared 

7 under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act 

8 (42 U.S.C. 247d) on January 31, 2020, including— 

9 (A) limitations on large gatherings of peo10 ple; 

11 (B) the closure of schools, businesses, 

12 houses of worship, and other facilities; 

13 (C) masking policies; 

14 (D) testing policies; and 

15 (E) vaccination policies; 

16 (2) an analysis and review of the scientific evi17 dence related to the effectiveness of such strategies 

18 in preventing or mitigating the spread of COVID– 

19 19, including estimates of the burden of disease and 

20 death that were avoided through such interventions; 

21 (3) an analysis and review of the economic and 

22 health impacts of such strategies, including impacts 

23 related to mental and physical health and student 

24 learning loss; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2686 IS

1 (4) an accounting of Federal funding used to 

2 implement such strategies. 

3 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the 

4 date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

5 of the United States shall submit a report on the study 

6 under subsection (a) to the Committee on Health, Edu7 cation, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the Com8 mittee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Rep9 resentatives. Such report shall include recommendations 

10 based on the findings of the study conducted under sub11 section (a) regarding the impact of such strategies during 

12 the COVID–19 public health emergency, including how to 

13 improve future responses. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
14910-13-PJ



### DEPARTMENT OF TR<\NSPORTATION Federal AviationAdministration 14CFR ParI 39 [Docket No. FAA-2009-0656; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-038-AD; Amendme 

# 1"°56 39-**; AD

## **1 

# JOOq
-J;i.-05 RIN 2I20-AA64 Airworthiness Directivesj Bombardier Model CL-600-2B 19(Regional Jet Series 100 440) Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation 

### (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We are supersedi.ng an 

### existing airworthiness 

### directive (AD) forthe products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness 

### information (MeAl) originated 

### byanaviation authority ofanother country toidentify NITIAI,SISI(;

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The 

### MeAl describes the unsafe I<QUl'INC,WMIlOI. INITIAI.5iSIG condition as:
ATE There have been several cases of wing leading edge anti-ice piccolo duct failure reported on CL-600-2B 19(CRJ) aircraft:. Upon investigation, it was determined that ducts manufactured since May 2000 are susceptible to cracking due to the process used to drill holes in the ducts. This cracking may cause air leakage, with apossible adverse effect on the anti-ice air distribution pattern and anti-ice capability, without annunciation to the flight crew [and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane]. lITlJ«; S\"MIlOL



## * 

# • * 

## * * 

# • * •"mAI.$'$IG
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-2000
<CASH>                                           5,058
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (357)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,632
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,465
<PP&E>                                          23,170
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,755)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,512
<BONDS>                                            205
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     35,208
<COMMON>                                         8,560
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,481)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,844
<SALES>                                         27,698
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,698
<CGS>                                           13,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,415
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   191
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 351
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,066)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,066)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,066)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.15)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 183 (Monday, September 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25198]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 2:00 p.m., Monday, October 27, 1997.

Place: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Fl. Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Adjudicatory Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-25198 Filed 9-18-97; 11:28 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
See permanent.fdlp.gov/gpo128100 for Teleport harvest.
Exhibit 10.9

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Employment Agreement (this "Agreement") is entered into as of May 20, 2003, between George Kanganis (the "Executive") and Florists' Transworld
Delivery, Inc. ("FTD").

WHEREAS,
the parties hereto previously entered into a letter agreement dated as of November 12, 2002 (the "Letter Agreement"), setting forth the terms of the Executive's
employment with FTD, and, in connection therewith, a Confidentiality and Non-Competition Agreement dated as of November 12, 2002 (the "Confidentiality and
Non-Competition Agreement"); and

WHEREAS,
the parties desire to modify certain terms of the Executive's employment with FTD and replace and supercede the Letter Agreement with this Agreement;

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth below and in the Confidentiality and Non-Competition Agreement, FTD and the Executive hereby
agree as follows:

---







2

---





For
purposes of this Agreement:



3

---







4

---





5

---







6

---





(Signature
page follows)

7

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto set their hands as of the date first set forth above.

| |  | FLORISTS' TRANSWORLD DELIVERY, INC.
| |  | -----------------------------------
| |  | /s/ROBERT L. NORTON                
| |  | By:                                
| |  | Its:                               
| |  | /s/GEORGE KANGANISGeorge Kanganis  

8

---



QuickLinks
### Ground-water resources in southern Oahu, Hawaii

By: F. N. VisherJohn F. Mink

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1778

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Summary of preliminary findings in ground-water studies of southern Oahu, Hawaii(1959)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Pangea Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Charles B. Pollock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 13, 2003   By: /s/ Charles B. Pollock
                             ----------------------

                             Charles  B.  Pollock,
                             Chief  Executive  Officer


<PAGE>
#### James B. McDONOUGH, Jr., as Administrator C. T. A. D. B. N. of the Estate of C. A. Rudisill, deceased, Appellant, v. Kay RUDISILL, a/k/a Dorothy Kay Rudisill, Appellee, and Henry Rudisill, a/k/a Henry Clifford Rudisill, II, a/k/a Clifford Rudisill, II, Appellee.

Nos. 68-385, 386.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 12, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 14, 1970.

James B. McDonough, Jr., and John A. Curtiss, of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison *&*Kelly, Tampa, for appellant.

J. A. McClain, Jr., of McClain & Turbi-ville; John J. Twomey, and Edward B. Rood, Tampa, for appellees.

McNULTY, Judge.

The administrator of the estate of C. A. Rudisill, deceased, directly appeals from the judgments herein in favor of appellees, in which the trial court awarded appellees a sum equal to the value of certain stock certificates which had passed from the decedent during his lifetime to appellees and subsequently delivered back by appellees for, they now say, his convenience. It is not disputed that with their authority he sold the certificates, but made no subsequent accounting to appellees prior to his death.

The issues in these consolidated cases center around first, whether the decedent made a completed gift to his niece and nephew, the appellees Kay Rudisill and Henry Clifford Rudisill, II, respectively; and secondly, whether they subsequently made a gift back. The record abounds with evidence from which the trial court could, as it did, answer the first question in the affirmative, and is completely devoid of competent evidence from which it could find, and it did not so find, a gift back.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be, and the same is hereby,

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and MANN, J., concur.
Exhibit 99.1

       Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
         By Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
       Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings

I, James A. Prestiano, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2002;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant is made known to me by
         others, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the registrant's board of directors:

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  November 13, 2002.

                                       /s/ James A. Prestiano
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       James A. Prestiano, President
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ROO Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Petty, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








November 20,
                2006
            /s/ Robert PettyRobert
                PettyChief
                Executive Officer