alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25484]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. 97-098-1]

In Vitro Testing of Veterinary Biologics; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Service is hosting a public meeting to discuss the 
implementation of guidelines for the in vitro testing of veterinary 
biologics.

PLACE, DATE, AND TIME OF MEETING: The meeting will be held in the main 
auditorium of the National Animal Disease Center, 2300 Dayton Road, 
Ames, IA. The meeting will be held from 8 a.m. until noon on Thursday, 
October 16, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Jeanette Greenberg, Center for 
Veterinary Biologics, Licensing and Policy Development, VS, APHIS, 4700 
River Road Unit 148, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; telephone (301) 734-
8400; fax (301) 734-8910; or E-mail: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a final rule published on April 18, 1997 
(62 FR 19033-19039, Docket No. 94-051-3), we amended our regulations in 
9 CFR part 113 to provide for the use of in vitro potency tests when 
conducting immunoassays to determine the relative antigen content 
(potency) of a serial of inactivated veterinary biological product once 
immunogenicity is established using host animal tests. The amended 
regulations provide that such tests are to be conducted using unexpired 
immunogenic reference preparations and parallel line assay or another 
method that is at least equivalent to the parallel line assay in terms 
of its linearity, specificity, and reproducibility.
    The purpose of the public meeting announced in this notice is to 
present and discuss draft guidelines pertaining to the qualification 
and requalification of reference preparations used in in vitro 
immunoassays affected by the change in the regulations.
    The meeting on October 16, 1997, will begin at 8 a.m. and end at 
noon; however, the meeting may end earlier if all persons desiring to 
speak have been heard. No advance registration is necessary to attend 
this meeting.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 22nd day of September 1997.
Terry L. Medley,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 97-25484 Filed 9-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
```
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
Data Series 765
Coastal       Topography�Northeast Atlantic Coast, Post-Hurricane Sandy,       2012                  Acronyms and       Abbreviations       ACRONYM ORABBREVIATION            DEFINITION            AGLI            Above Ground Level            ASCII            American Standard Code for Information             Interchange            ASPRS            American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote             Sensing            BE            Bare Earth            cm            Centimeter(s)            CMGP            Coastal and Marine Geology Program            DEM            Digital Elevation Model            Dhigh            Dune High, or Dune Crest            Dlow            Dune Low, or Dune Toe            ESRI            Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.            FGDC            Federal Geographic Data Committee            FVA            Fundamental Vertical Accuracy            GIS            Geographic Information System            GPS            Global Positioning System            GSD            Ground Sample Distance            HTML            Hypertext Markup Language            IMG            Imagine            IMU            Inertial Measurement Unit            Inc            Incorporated            LAS            Log ASCII             Standard            lidar            Light Detection and Ranging            m            Meter(s)            NAD83            North American Datum 1983            NAVD88            North American Vertical Datum 1988            NPS            National Park Service            nps            Nominal Pulse Spacing            QA/QC            Quality Assurance/Quality Control            SBET            Smoothed Best Estimate of Trajectory            USGS            U.S. Geological             Survey            UTM            Universal Transverse Mercator            WMS            Web Map Service            XML            Extensible Markup       Language
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/765/pubs765/html/acronyms.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, May 16, 2013, 11:30:40 AM
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.27


                    SECOND AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

     THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO SEVERANCE AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is made
this 31st day of December, 1998, by and between ENCORE ORTHOPEDICS, INC., a
Delaware corporation, with its principal office located at 9800 Metric Blvd.,
Austin, Texas 78758 (the "Company") and NICK CINDRICH, an individual resident at
#6 Candleleaf, Austin, Texas 78738 (the "Employee").

     WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company entered into a Severance Agreement
dated November 27, 1995, as amended (the "Agreement") which provided, inter
alia, for certain payments to be made in the event that certain events occurred
with respect to the Employee's employment relationship with the Company;

     WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company desire that there be certain changes
made with respect to the Agreement; and

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Employee want to memorialize in this Amendment
their agreements regarding such changes to the Agreement.

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other mutual promises
and covenants contained in this Amendment and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties, intending legally to be bound, agree as follows:

     1. The changes contemplated by the Amendment to Severance Agreement dated
March 18, 1997 shall not take effect as of March 25, 1999 and shall have no
further force and effect.

     2. Except as specifically changed by the Amendment, all other terms and
provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by
its duly authorized officer and the Employee has hereunto set its hand as of the
date and year first written above.

                                        ENCORE:

                                        ENCORE ORTHOPEDICS, INC.


                                        By: /s/ CRAIG SMITH
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Craig Smith, President


                                        EMPLOYEE:

                                        /s/ NICK CINDRICH
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        NICK CINDRICH
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7364

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ANDRE D. WHITFIELD , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:07

- cr - 00300

- HEH

- 1; 3:17

- cv - 00665

- HEH )

Submitted : December 21, 2017 Decided: December 28, 2017

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Andre D. Whitfield, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, V irginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Andre D. Whitfield seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 47 3, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debata ble claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Whitfield has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 185 (Wednesday, September 24, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49937-49938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25344]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Care Financing Administration

42 CFR Part 473

[BPD-453-CN]
Rin 0938-AG18


Medicare Program; Medicare Appeals of Individual Claims; 
Correction

AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS.

ACTION: Correction to final regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the May 12, 1997 issue of the Federal Register, we 
published a regulation titled, ``Medicare Appeals of Individual Claims, 
BPD-453-FC.'' That final rule concerned individual claims appeals under 
part A and part B. We made an error in that regulation and this 
document corrects that error.


[[Page 49938]]


EFFECTIVE DATES: This correction is effective June 11, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Morton Marcus, (410) 786-4477.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On May 12, 1997 (62 FR 25844) we published a final rule with 
comment period that expanded our regulations to recognize the right of 
Medicare Part B appellants to a hearing before an administrative law 
judge (ALJ) for claims if at least $500 remains in dispute and the 
right to judicial review of an adverse ALJ decision if at least $1,000 
remains in controversy. That rule also codified limitations on the 
review by ALJs and the courts of certain national coverage 
determinations and the statutory authority for an expedite appeals 
process under part A and part B. Finally, we made a number of technical 
conforming amendments.

Need for Correction

    On page 25855, in the second and third columns we provided a number 
of technical amendments. Amendment number 8, beginning at the bottom of 
column 2, was intended to correct wording in Sec. 473.38 which concerns 
Peer Review Organization reconsidered decisions. Amendment 8(b) 
incorrectly calls for deletions of a phrase from paragraph (a) of 
Sec. 473.38, whereas the phrase actually occurs in the undesignated 
introductory material of that section. Accordingly, we are making the 
following correction to document 97-12263 appearing in the Federal 
Register of May 12, 1997.


Sec. 473.38  [Corrected]

    On page 25855 the first two lines of column 3 are corrected to read 
as follows:
    ``(b) In the undesignated introductory material, the words `final 
and' are removed.''
* * * * *
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.778, Medical 
Assistance Program; No. 93.773 Medicare--Hospital Insurance Program; 
and No. 93.774, Medicare--Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)

    Dated: September 18, 1997.
Neil J. Stillman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Information Resource Management.
[FR Doc. 97-25344 Filed 9-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-M
### Magnitude and frequency of floods in the United States, part 6–B. Missouri River basin below Sioux City, Iowa

By: H. F. Matthai

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1680

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

This certification set forth below is hereby madesolely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any otherpurposes.

In connection with the Annual Report of Ezenia! Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Khoa D. Nguyen, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

| Date:  April 10, 2006 | By:    | /s/ Khoa D. Nguyen        |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                       |   | Khoa D. Nguyen            |
|                       |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|                       |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DWAYNE SCICCHITANO, : Civ. No. 4:15-CV-00852

PAMELA BOLLINGER, ROBERT :

MCANDREW, DAVID :

YAKOBOSKI, BARRY :

SCHWEITZER, JAMES BRESSI, :

and ALBERT BENEDICT :

: (Judge Brann)

:

Plaintiffs, :

:

:

v. :

:

COUNTY OF :

NORTHUMBERLAND, VINNY :

CLAUSI, and STEPHEN BRIDY, :

:

Defendants. :

ORDER

September 17, 2015

AND NOW, in accordance with the memorandum of this same date, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 36)

Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is DENIED.

BY THE COURT: 

/s Matthew W. Brann

Matthew W. Brann 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:15-cv-00852-MWB Document 52 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 1
#### Albert CORVISON, Appellant, v. Brenda Kay CORVISON, Appellee.

No. 77-2558.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 1, 1978.

Nelson & Nelson, Hialeah, for appellant.

Byrd V. Duke, Jr. and Nancy Appleton, North Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Albert Corvison appeals that portion of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage awarding permanent custody of the two minor daughters, Angela 6 and Jennifer 3, to his former wife, Brenda, and contends *324this custody award by the chancellor constituted an abuse of discretion.

While Section 61.13(2), Florida Statutes (1977) provides for equal consideration of the spouses in awarding custody, the law still remains that other essential factors being equal, the mother of the child of tender years should receive prime consideration for custody. *Anderson v. Anderson,*309 So.2d 1 (Fla.1975).

The chancellor in the case at bar determined that the best interests of the minor children dictated that custody be awarded to their mother. After a review of the record, we conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion by the chancellor. See *Dinkel v. Dinkel,*322 So.2d 22 (Fla.1975) and cases cited therein.

Affirmed.
No. 00-803.

#### Medlock *v.*Wood.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Airman First Class MICHAEL A. HABBE

United States Air Force

ACM 38562

31 March 2015

Sentence adjudged 29 January 201 4 by G CM convened at McConnell Air

Force Base

, Kansas . Military Judge: Joshua E. Kastenberg (on

arraignment ) and Matthew S. Ward (on trial) (s itting alone).

Approved S entence: Bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 4 months

, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to E

- 1

.

Appellate Counsel f

or the Appellant: Captain Lauren A. Shure

.

Appellate Counsel for the United States: Major Daniel J. Bree n ; Captain

Thomas J. Alford, and Gerald R. Bruce, Esquire

.

Before

ALLRED, HECKER, and TELLER

Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is issued as an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent

under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4

.



### PER CURIAM :

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error

materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occ urred. Article 66(c),

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed , 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000).

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

STEVEN LUCAS

Clerk of the Court
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00380

- CV

IN RE E.H.R., JR

., a C hild

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA01921

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against appellant in relation to this appeal

because appellant qualifies as indigent under T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.

SIGNED November 27, 2019.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
#### Dr. Robin C. BROWN and Dr. William N. Dakos, Petitioners, v. Marion WILLIAMS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Guy Williams, deceased, Respondent.

No. 69-587.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 5, 1970.

Howard E. Barwick, of Blackwell, Walker & Gray, Miami, for petitioners.

*180Robert Orseck, of Podhurst & Orseck; and Spence, Payne & Masington, Miami, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied on authority of Duran v. McPherson (4th DCA), 233 So.2d 639, opinion filed March 6, 1970; Beta Eta House Corporation, Inc. v. Gregory, Fla.App.1970, 230 So.2d 495. See also Employers Fire Insurance Company et al. v. Blanchard, etc. et al., (2d DCA), 234 So.2d 381, opinion filed April 17, 1970; Shipman (Employers Fire Insurance Company) v. Kinderman, (1st DCA), 232 So.2d 21, opinion filed February 24, 1970; Hannon v. Entell, (4th DCA), 233 So.2d 640, and Holy Cross Hospital, Inc. v. Entell, (4th DCA), 233 So.2d 640, opinion filed April 8, 1970.

HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JT., concur.