alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00261

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF C.Y., A C HILD §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 442nd District

Court

of Denton County ( 20

- 1038

- 442 )

February 18, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
Case 4:05-cv-02445-ARC Document 4 Filed 05/24/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:05-cv-02445-ARC Document 4 Filed 05/24/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Tullys Coffee Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March
28, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 13, 2005 (the Report), I, John D. Dresel, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company (principal executive officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JOHN D DRESEL                                                                                
|John D. Dresel President and Chief Operating Officer (principal executive officer) April 13, 2005
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Amended Annual Report of Tully’s Coffee Corporation  (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for thefiscal year ended March 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony J. Gioia, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Anthony J. Gioia            |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| Anthony  J. Gioia                     |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| February 11, 2003                     |   |

 

----
Exhibit 10.13(b)



LOGO



AMENDMENT #1



TO NFS CONTRACT OF SALE & SECURITY AGREEMENT



Dated: June 22, 2005



Definitions:



Paragraph 19 as follows:



Purchase Formula means at any time, and amount equal to 120% of the net amount of all Acceptable/Eligible Accounts.



Is replaced by:



Purchase Formula means at any time, an amount equal to 130% of the net amount of all Acceptable/Eligible Accounts.



This amendment is effective and applicable to invoices purchased under the CONTRACT OF
SALE & SECURITY AGREEMENT of even date. All other terms, covenants and conditions will remain in effect and unchanged.



|                           |  |                                                     |  |  |  |  |  |                    
|-------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------
|Tullys Coffee Corporation |  |                                                     |  | 
|                           |  |                                                     |  | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ Kristopher S. Galvin                            |  |  |  |  |  | Date: July 20, 2005
|                           |  | Kristopher S. Galvin Executive Vice President &
CFO |  |  |  |  |  |                    



Northrim Funding Services, a
division of Northrim Bank



Accepted this 20th day of July, 2005, at Bellevue,
WA



|    |  |                                 |  |  |  |  |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | 
|    |  |                                 |  | 
|    |  |                                 |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Daniel J. Lowell            |  |  |  |  |  | 
|    |  | Daniel J. Lowell Vice President |  |  |  |  |  | 



|Page
 1 | Acknowledgment
|------- | --------------
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with theInfinex Ventures Inc. (the Company) on 10Q SB for the period ending April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael De Rosa, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Date: | June14, 2005
|----- | ------------



|/s/Michael De Rosa
|------------------

(Signature)



Chief Executive Officer and            Chief Financial Officer

(Title)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


1.       Dave & Buster's of Illinois, Inc., an Illinois corporation

2.       Dave & Buster's of Georgia, Inc., a Georgia corporation

3.       Dave & Buster's of Pennsylvania, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation

4.       DANB Texas, Inc., a Texas corporation

5.       Dave & Buster's of Maryland, Inc., a Maryland corporation

6.       Dave & Buster's of California, Inc., a California corporation

7.       Dave & Buster's of Colorado, Inc., a Colorado corporation

8.       Dave & Buster's of New York, Inc., a New York corporation

9.       Dave & Buster's of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation

10.      Dave & Buster's of Pittsburgh, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation

11.      Dave & Buster's of Hawaii, Inc., a Hawaii corporation
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00015

- CV
Creative Artists Agency, LLC, Twisted Roads Touring, LLC, 4FINI, Inc., Brett Saliba,

Sarah Siquieros F/K/A Sarah Baer, and Kevin Lyman v. Las Palmas Race Park, LLC Las Palmas Downs, Inc. and Front Porch Entertainment
On Appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 3927

- 13

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 29 , 2015
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1415 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 9 ) IV-E- 9 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/15/2008 9:38:25 AM

Sheet 9 of 130P. 2 J.3X5^»J.6XU t « , p l^-l*"* ' vv * *

From : Date : Contact : Company : Contac tRepor t

Kennet h R . Meardo

n Pacifi c Environmenta

l Services , Inc . (PBS ) Marc h 20,200 2 Mr . Kur tAnderson , Directo rEH& S Monac o Coac

h Corporation, Wakaruga

, I N Telephon e Number : (219)862-734 7 Fa x Number : (219)862-731 3 

# r

EP A AI R DOCKE T Contac tSummary : I contacte d Mr. Anderso n t o determin e i f thei rfacilit

y use s unfille d resin s o

rfilled resins . Mr , Anderso n indicate d tha tthe y us e unfilled resins. Mr . Anderso n als o note d tha tthei rfacilit

y opene d tw o year s ag o a s a Sectio n 112(g ) facilit y meetin g pnemMAC

T leve l o f control . H e indicate d tha

tthi s i s wh y th e emission s from th e facilit y ar e s o low . &K**4^

INFORMATIO N I S ACCURATE : 

# t# , ($iU~-

—ShJilm^ eas e enternam e and date 1 ! / (Pleas e enternam e and date )
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 183 (Monday, September 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25085]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Department of Defense Wage Committee; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Pub. L. 92-463, the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that closed 
meetings of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held on 
October 7, 1997; October 14, 1997; October 21, 1997; and October 28, 
1997, at 10:00 a.m. in Room A105, The Nash Building, 1400 Key 
Boulevard, Rosslyn, Virginia.
    Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the 
Department of Defense has determined that the meetings meet the 
criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be 
considered are related to internal rules and practices of the 
Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were 
obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that 
the data will be held in confidence.
    However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to 
submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed 
to be deserving of the Committee's attention.
    Additional information concerning the meetings may be obtained by 
writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000

    Dated: September 16, 1997.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-25085 Filed 9-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### Robert Reginald HARPER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-112.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 11, 1970.

Richard W. Ervin, Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Miller v. State, 220 So.2d 652 (Fla.App.1969).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
#### HATCHER v. Broward WILLIAMS, State Treasurer.

No. 39019.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 226 So.2d 286.
#### Peiffer et al., Appellants, *v.*Kreider.

Argued October 24, 1933.

*31Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham:, Baldrige, Stabtfeld, Parker and Jamies, JJ.

*Eugene D. Siegrist,*and with him *Harry J. Schools,*for appellants.

*G. D. 'Becker*of *Becker & Ehrgood,*for appellee.

December 16, 1933:

Per Curiam:,

The plaintiffs’ decedent while walking was struck by an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. The only liability for the death of the pedestrian that could be attached to the defendant is that “he was negligent in his failure to see the deceased until he hit him.” We do not think the testimony is sufficient to support such conclusion, but even if it were, we think the decedent was guilty of contributory negligence. We quote further from the opinion of the lower court who entered judgment in favor of the defendant:

> “The speed of the defendant was not excessive *32where as here there was no other traffic and not a congested or built-up community. There was a heavy down grade on which no car could be stopped on the instant when running at a reasonable speed and the positive evidence is that when the deceased started to cross the road the defendant sounded his horn and swerved his car in an attempt to avoid the accident. The positive evidence also is that the deceased started to cross the highway when the automobile was within a few feet of him, and that he looked before starting to cross and that, his view was clear and unobstructed for a distance of 550 feet. Under this testimony the proximate cause of the injury to and death of Harvey Peiffer was his suddenly walking into the path of the approaching car of the defendant and in doing this he was- chargeable with contributory negligence as a matter of law which precludes any recovery for his death.”

We may also observe that the deceased was walking in the gutter on the right side of the road immediately before he was struck. The line of traffic was going in the same direction as he was and a direct view of the oncoming car of the defendant was not afforded to him unless he turned before entering the roadbed: Skodis et ux. v. Phila. R. T. Co., 103 Pa. Superior Ct. 533, 158 A. 587. One witness testified that he looked both ways before he proceeded to cross. If he had looked, the accident would not have happened, for there was, as the lower court states, a clear unobstructed view in the direction from which the defendant’s car was coming.

The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace Station Software IssuesIssues in the development of software for the Space Station are discussed. Software acquisition and management, software development environment, standards, information system support for software developers, and a future software advisory board are addressed.Document ID19850012379Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference ProceedingsAuthorsVoigt, S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Beskenis, S.*(Kentron International, Inc., Hampton Va., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1985Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNASA-CP-2361NAS 1.55:2361L-15945Accession Number85N20689Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 482-58-13-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850012379.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1992 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1992

             For the relief of Marcos Antonio Sanchez-Diaz.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 10, 2005

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             For the relief of Marcos Antonio Sanchez-Diaz.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR MARCOS ANTONIO SANCHEZ-DIAZ.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Marcos Antonio Sanchez-Diaz 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of that Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Marcos Antonio Sanchez-Diaz enters 
the United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection 
(c), Marcos Antonio Sanchez-Diaz shall be considered to have entered 
and remained lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Marcos Antonio Sanchez-Diaz, 
the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 
1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
birth of Marcos Antonio Sanchez-Diaz under section 203(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
birth of Marcos Antonio Sanchez-Diaz under section 202(e) of that Act.
                                 <all>
```
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment and Economic Status of Older Men and Women

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Employment and Economic Status of Older Men and Women : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1092*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										May 1952,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4437,			accessed on September 19, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,004
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,004
<PP&E>                                         178,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,900)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 176,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,810
<BONDS>                                        160,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,990
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,896)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   176,104
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,950
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,960)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,960)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,960)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.004)


</TABLE>