alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2
                                906 CERTIFICATION

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         The certificate set forth below is being submitted in connection with
the annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004, (the
"Report") for the purpose of complying with the Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

          Zhang Liyan, the Deputy Chief Financial Officer of Jilin Chemical
Industrial Company Limited, certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:

     1.the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respect, the financial condition and results of operations of
          Jilin Chemical Industrial Company Limited.

Date:    May 19, 2005



                                   By: /S/ZHANG LIYAN
                                       ---------------
                                   Name:  Zhang Liyan
                                   Title: Deputy Chief Financial Officer










A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO JILIN CHEMICAL INDUSTRIAL COMPANY
LIMITED AND WILL BE RETAINED BY JILIN CHEMICAL INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LIMITED AND
FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### Jerry POWERS v. STATE of Florida.

No. 38923.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 224 So.2d 411.
<Page>



EXHIBIT 99.1

                           VION PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan
Kessman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: March 28, 2003

/s/ Alan Kessman
----------------
Alan Kessman
President and Chief Executive Officer



                                      1
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
undersigned, Michael Dougherty, the President of Sierra Resource Group, Inc.,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge,
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. for
quarter ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Sierra Resource Group, Inc.








Date: May
21,  2010





/s/  
      Michael DoughertyMichael
      Dougherty
              President










A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Sierra Resource Group, Inc. and will be
retained by Sierra Resource Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NO. 07-07 -026 5-CR IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL B OC TOBER19, 2007

_________

_________

_________

___ J U STI N C U R TI S OE H LE R T, Appel lan t

v. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, Appel lee

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 25 1 stDIS T RI CT COU RT OF RA NDA L L COU NT Y; NO. 15, 547 -C; HON. ANA EST EVE Z, PRESIDING

_________

_________

_________

____ ON ABA TEMENT AND REMAN D

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Appel lan t app eal s from his conv ic ti on for ag g ra v ated ro bber y . On O cto ber

1, 2007, the clerk’s record w as f iled. T he repo rter’s reco rd was d ue on Se pte mb er 28, 2 007 . No extension mot ion or record was filed . On Octob er 5, 20 07, this court directe d the court repo rter byletter “to ad v ise the Court of the sta tus of

the rep ort e r’ s reco rd on or be fore Mo nday , Octob er

15, 2007." T o dat e, no record or extens ion moti on has been filed w it h thi s C our

t.2

Accordin gly , w e ab ate this app eal and rem and the cause to the 251 st District Court of Randa ll C oun ty (trial court) for f urthe r proce edin gs. Upon rema nd, the trial court sha ll immedi atel y

ca use noti ce of a hear ing to be g iv en and, thereafter, co n d u ct a hear ing to d e te rm in e th e fo llo wing: 1. w hy

the re por

ter ’s record has not been fil ed, 2. w hen t he repor

ter ’s record c an reason abl y be f iled in a manner

that does not fur

ther del ay the prosec uti on of thi s a p p eal or hav e the pr act ic al eff ectof depr iv ing the appel lan t of hi s r ig ht t o appea l, and, 3. w hether

an a lt er nate or

su bst it ute repor

ter sh oul d or

ca n be appoi nted to c omplet e the record i n a t imel y manner . The tr ial co urt s hal l caus e the hear ing to be transc ri bed. So too s hal l it1) ex ecut e findi ng s o f factand conc lus ion s o f law address ing the f o re g oin g i ss ues, 2) ca use to be dev elo ped a suppl emental cl er k’ s record c ontai nin g i ts findi ng s o f factand conc lus ion s o f law and all orders i t may

i ss ue as a re sul t of

its hear ing in this m atter , and 3) cause to be dev elo ped a re por

ter ’s re cord transc ri bin g the e v ide nce and arg uments present ed atthe aforementi oned he ar ing , i f an y. Addi ti onal ly , t he di str ic t c our t s hal l then file the supp lem ent al clerk’s and repo rter’s records transcribing the he aring w ith the clerk of this court on or before Novemb er 19, 2 007 . Sh ould f urthe r time be nee ded bythe trial court to pe rfor m thes e tas ks , t hen s ame mustbe req uest ed befor e N ov ember 19, 2007. It is so order ed. Per C ur iam Do not p ubl is h.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-42803) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Stock Option
Plan and the 1996 Stock Plan of UOL Publishing, Inc. of our report dated
February 27, 1998 except for Notes 9 and 17, as to which the dates are March 27
and 30, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of UOL Publishing, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1997.


Vienna, Virginia                                   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
March 30, 1998
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2735 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2735

    To clarify that section 8526(7) of the Elementary and Secondary 
 Education Act of 1965 does not apply with respect to the use of funds 
for activities carried out under programs authorized by the Elementary 
  and Secondary Education Act of 1965 that are otherwise permissible 
    under such programs and that provide students with educational 
 enrichment activities and instruction, such as archery, hunter safety 
                      education, or culinary arts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 6, 2023

  Mr. Tester introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To clarify that section 8526(7) of the Elementary and Secondary 
 Education Act of 1965 does not apply with respect to the use of funds 
for activities carried out under programs authorized by the Elementary 
  and Secondary Education Act of 1965 that are otherwise permissible 
    under such programs and that provide students with educational 
 enrichment activities and instruction, such as archery, hunter safety 
                      education, or culinary arts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defending Hunters' Education Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTION.

    Section 8526(7) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 7906(7)) is amended by inserting ``, except that this 
paragraph shall not apply to the use of funds under this Act for 
activities carried out under programs authorized by this Act that are 
otherwise permissible under such programs and that provide students 
with educational enrichment activities and instruction, such as 
archery, hunter safety education, or culinary arts'' before the period 
at the end.
                                 <all>
```
II 

Calendar No. 11 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 203 

[Report No. 109-4] 

To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be paid for sodium produced 

on Federal lands, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2005 

Mr. THOMAS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

FEBRUARY 16, 2005 

Reported by Mr. DOMENICI, without amendment 

A BILL

To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be paid for 

sodium produced on Federal lands, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Soda Ash Royalty Re5 duction Act of 2005’’. 
2

•S 203 RS

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN ROYALTY RATE ON SODA ASH. 

2 Notwithstanding section 102(a)(9) of the Federal 

3 Land Policy Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 

4 1701(a)(9)), section 24 of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 

5 U.S.C. 262), and the terms of any lease under that Act, 

6 the royalty rate on the quantity or gross value of the out7 put of sodium compounds and related products at the 

8 point of shipment to market from Federal land in the 5-

9 year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 

10 Act shall be 2 percent. 

11 SEC. 3. STUDY. 

12 After the end of the 4-year period beginning on the 

13 date of the enactment of this Act, and before the end of 

14 the 5-year period beginning on that date, the Secretary 

15 of the Interior shall report to the Congress on the effects 

16 of the royalty reduction under this Act, including— 

17 (1) the amount of sodium compounds and re18 lated products at the point of shipment to market 

19 from Federal land during that 4-year period; 

20 (2) the number of jobs that have been created 

21 or maintained during the royalty reduction period; 

22 (3) the total amount of royalty paid to the 

23 United States on the quantity or gross value of the 

24 output of sodium compounds and related products at 

25 the point of shipment to market produced during 
3

•S 203 RS

1 that 4-year period, and the portion of such royalty 

2 paid to States; and 

3 (4) a recommendation of whether the reduced 

4 royalty rate should apply after the end of the 5-year 

5 period beginning on the date of the enactment of 

6 this Act. 
Calendar No. 11 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 203 

[Report No. 109-4] 

A BILL

To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be 

for other purposes. paid for sodium produced on Federal lands, and 

FEBRUARY 16, 2005 

Reported without amendment
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23755]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Research and Development Cooperative Studies Evaluation Committee 
Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice under Public Law 
92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) as amended, by section 5(c) of 
Public Law 94-409, that a meeting of the Research and Development 
Cooperative Studies Evaluation Committee will be held at the Marriott 
Residence Inn, 550 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, October 8-9, 
1997. The session on October 8 is scheduled to begin at 7:30 a.m. and 
end at 5:15 p.m. and on October 9 from 7:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. The 
meeting will be for the purpose of reviewing one new protocol for 
multi-hospital clinical trial on prophylaxis of medical patients for 
thromboembolism and the progress of five on-going cooperative studies 
on treatment of alcoholic liver fibrosis, betablocker for heart 
failure, cancer intervention versus observation trial, treatment of 
unstable angina and evaluation of geriatric cares.
    The Committee advises the Chief Research and Development Officer 
through the Chief of the Cooperative Studies Program on the relevance 
and feasibility of the studies, the adequacy of the protocols, and the 
scientific validity and propriety of technical details, including 
protection of human subjects.
    The meeting will be open to the public from 7:30 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. 
on both days to discuss the general status of the program. Those who 
plan to attend should contact Dr. Ping Huang, Coordinator, Medical 
Research Service Cooperative Studies Evaluation Committee, Department 
of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, (202-273-8295), prior to October 
3, 1997.
    The meeting will be closed from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on October 
8, 1997, and from 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., on October 9, 1997, for 
consideration of specific proposals in accordance with provisions set 
forth in section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, as amended by section 5(c) 
of Public Law 94-409, and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). During this portion of 
the meeting, discussions and recommendations will deal with 
qualifications of personnel conducting the studies, staff and 
consultant critiques of research protocols, and similar documents, and 
the medical records of patients who are study subjects, the disclosures 
of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.

    Dated: August 26, 1997.

    By Direction of the Secretary-Designate.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-23755 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
Filed 7/13/10 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2010 ND 128

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Gene Walter Colby, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20100057

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gary H. Lee, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Kelly A. Dillon (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 5005, Minot, N.D. 58702-5005, for plaintiff and appellee.

Faron E. Terry (on brief), 216 South Broadway, Suite 3, P.O. Box 717, Minot, N.D. 58702-0717, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Colby

No. 20100057

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Gene Colby appeals a criminal judgment entered after his conditional plea of guilty, convicting him of driving under the influence.  He argues he was subjected to double jeopardy in the criminal proceedings, because his commercial driving privileges had already been disqualified for life.  He also argues he was deprived of procedural due process when the district court denied his motion to dismiss without first holding a hearing.

[¶2]We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).  Colby was not subjected to double jeopardy in the criminal proceedings.  See State v. Zimmerman, 539 N.W.2d 49 (N.D. 1995) (holding criminal prosecution following administrative license suspension does not violate double jeopardy under the U.S. Constitution); State v. Jacobson, 545 N.W.2d 152 (N.D. 1996) (same holding under the North Dakota constitution).  Colby relies on Bienek v. Dep’t of Transp., 2007 ND 117, 736 N.W.2d 492, for the proposition that he was “convicted” administratively, but his reliance is misplaced.  In Bienek, this Court held an administrative license suspension of noncommercial driving privileges was a “conviction” as defined in N.D.C.C. § 39- 06.2-02(8) and thus counted as one of two “convictions” that resulted in the loss of Bienek’s commercial driving privileges for life under N.D.C.C. § 39-06.2-10(8).  Bienek v. Dep’t of Transp., 2007 ND 117, ¶¶ 10-11, 736 N.W.2d 492.  The definition of “conviction” in Bienek, however, applied only to chapter 39-06.2.  N.D.C.C. § 39-06.2-02(8) (“As used in this chapter . . . “[c]onviction means . . . a determination that a person has violated or failed to comply with the law.”) (emphasis added).  The criminal offense of DUI is not governed by chapter 39-06.2.  Additionally, Colby was not deprived of procedural due process when the district court denied his motion to dismiss without first holding a hearing, because his motion 

and brief were not timely served and filed.  See N.D.R.Ct. 3.2(a)(3) (“If any party who has timely served and filed a brief requests oral argument, the request must be granted.”) (emphasis added); see also Guardianship of Norman, 521 N.W.2d 395, 396-97 (N.D. 1994) (because brief and request for oral argument were filed before deadline, district court was required to consider request).

[¶3]The criminal judgment is affirmed.

[¶4]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner
No. 00-6419.

#### Whitehead *v.*Paramount Pictures Corp. et al.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis [ante,*p. 1033] denied.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 60743 Summary Calendar

PARESH BHAI RABARI , Petitioner

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A205 196 047

Before SMITH, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Petitioner Paresh Bhai Rabari petitions for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that dismiss ed his appeal from the order of the immigration judge (IJ) denying as untimely his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Motions to reopen are disfavored, and the moving party m ust

carry a heavy burden. Altamirano

- Lopez v. Gonzales , 435 F.3d 547, 549 (5th Cir. 2006). The denia l of such a motion is reviewed “ under a highly deferentia l

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 24, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-60743 Document: 00512710326 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/24/2014N o. 13

- 60743

abuse

- of

- discretion standard.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
A motio n to reopen must be filed within 90 days of the date on which the final administrative decision is issued. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i). A n alien is not bound by this time limit , however, if the motion is made for purposes of appl ying for as ylum or for w ithholding of removal “ based on changed country conditions arising in the country of nationality or the country to which removal has been ordered, if such evidence is material and was not available and would not have been discovered or presen ted at the pre vious proceeding.” § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii)

. Rabari does not contest that he failed to file his motion within the 90

- day time limit. See § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i). Although he cites new evidence not contained in the administrative record to show a change of count ry conditions in India, we may not consider this evidence. See Hernandez

- Ortez v. Holder , 741 F.3d 644, 647 (5th Cir. 2014). To the extent that Rabari has not otherwise abandoned his appeal through his failure to brief his arguments adequately ,

see Soadjede v. Ashcroft , 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003), his concluso nal assertions that his motion to reopen should have been granted are wholly insufficient to show that the BIA abused its discretion. See Altamirano

- Lopez , 435 F.3d at 549. His petition for review is DENIED.

2 Case: 13-60743 Document: 00512710326 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/24/2014
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0076

SAT Date: 11/9/2012

Print Date: 2/4/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR-E,S,L,MM, LUNG, UNCERT-SENS, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0063-77

FATE: Estimations for typical 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 3.30 (E) 

S = Dispersible / 73.2 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 5.66 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E)
log Fish BAF = 1.79 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through 

the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. The PMN material is expected to be 

a strong irritant to all exposed tissues based on the amines and the surfactant properties of the 

material. There is also concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on 

cationic binding to lung tissues and/or interference with the natural surfactant balance in the 

lungs. There is uncertain concern for sensitization for the . Moderate 

concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 3.1 aliphatic amine SAR

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.47 aliphatic amine SAR

green algal 96-h EC50 0.18 amide SAR

fish _ chronic value 0.023 amide SAR

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.050 aliphatic amine SAR

algal _ chronic 

value

0.074 aliphatic amine SAR

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for aliphatic amines and amides; 

SAR chemical class = aliphatic amine, amide; ; liquid; log Kow = 4.21 (EPI); S = 

dispersible in water at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

2 amide SAR

SARs aliphatic amines and amides

SAR Class aliphatic amine, amide

Ecotox Category None
Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones