alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  the
Company's unaudited statements of operations, balance sheets and statements of
cash flows and is qualified by reference to such financial statements contained
within the Company's Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0001077038
<NAME>     Wellspring Investments, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                        2936
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              2936
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         1040
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      1
<COMMON>                                       100
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2936
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (26632)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (26632)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0




</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Theupper atmosphere and satellite drag**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:5/2
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001068772
 
September 4, 2018
### Water in the Kahuku area, Oahu, Hawaii

By: K. J. TakasakiSantos Valenciano

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1874

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
256 La. 67

#### INTERIOR CONTRACTORS, INC. v. CASHEN METAL FABRICATION, INC.

No. 50483.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 1970.

In re: Cashen Metal Fabrication, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Tammany. 231 So.2d 708.

The application is denied. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
### The Passaic flood of 1903

By: Marshall O. Leighton

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp92

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### Waterpower resources in Trask River basin, Oregon

By: Loyd L. Young

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1610B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Waterpower resources in the Trask River basin, Oregon(1960)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
SERVE D AUGUS T 29 , 201 1 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N 

### •":i-l^ARTMEi;! T O F iHANSPORlATiO N OFFIC E O FHEAJ^ING S , v^^^i T OPERr^'iON

S WASHINGTON , D C •• mAlJ G 3 0 AU : 11 1 I N TH E MATTERO F SK Y KING . INC . FAA DOCKE T NO . [T O B E ASSIGNED ]

(Civi l Penalty Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-201 1 -067 0 NOTIC E O FASSFGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G This , proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s FA A Cas e No . 2010SO700422) ha s bee n assigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e RichardC . Goodwin . All future pleading s andothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r

person s o n th e attache dServic e List .

Chie f Administrati Attaclimen t

- Servic e Lis tFDM S No . FAA-20n-067 0 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 h)dependenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention . Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Stephen A . Badger , V P Fligh t Operation s an

dDirecto r o f Safet y an dSecurity Sk y King , Inc . 360 0 Power

In n Road , Suite H Sacramento , C A 9582 6 TEL : 916-454-240 0 FAX : 916-737-896 0 Geral dA . Ellis , Cowphinan i ' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regional Counse l Souther n Region , ASO- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 2063 6 Atlanta , GA 3032 0 TEL : 404-305-520 0 FAX ; 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Admitusiraiiv e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-A dviso r 202-366-512 1 Legal Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6 Fa

x

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r ser\'ice i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e Ui e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration

, 80 0 Independenc

e Avenue , S. W . Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Siiil

e 2W1000 , Wasliington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46960-46961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23546]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-177-005]


Steuben Gas Storage Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

August 29, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 26, 1997, Steuben Gas Storage Company 
(Steuben) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 5, and Substitute 
First Revised Sheet No. 126, to be effective June 1, 1997.
    Steuben states that the attached tariff sheets are being filed in 
compliance with the Commission's Order issued on August 15, 1997 in the 
above Captioned docket.
    Steuben states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
company's Jurisdictional customers.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make any protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this 
filing are on file with the Commission

[[Page 46961]]

and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23546 Filed 9-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-0062

_____________________________

GARY W. MCMICHAEL, LISA V.

MCMICHAEL and THIRD-PARTY 

DEFENDANT, THE TURN KEY 

GROUP, INC.,

Appellants,

v.

CHARTERBANK, THOMAS D.

ZACHOS, et al.,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Michael A. Flowers, Judge.

November 7, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Phillip A. Pugh and Haley Hadden of Litvak Beasley Wilson & 

Ball, LLP, Pensacola, for Appellants.

Natasha Z. Revell of Zalkin Revell, PLLC, Santa Rosa Beach, for 

Appellees Thomas Zachos and Kalliope Zachos.
#### TROPIC-AIR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Appellant, v. Paul ROSEN, Appellee.

No. 69-117.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 22, 1969.

Rehearing Denied May 21, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CHALLENGES TO EXCESSIVE MARITIME CLAIMS 

1 OCTOBER 2008-30 SEPTEMBER 2009 

Country Excessive Maritime Claim 

Argentina Notification required before foreign 

warships transit the Strait of Magellan 

or in proximity of the territorial sea 

China* Jurisdiction over airspace above EEZ; 

domestic law criminalizing survey 

activity by foreign entities in the EEZ 

India* Authorization required for military 

maneuvers in the EEZ 

Indonesia* Partial designation of archipelagic sea 

lanes 

Liberia* Excessive territorial sea claim 

Iran* Restrictions on right of transit passage 

through Strait of Hormuz to 

signatories of the United Nations 

Convention on Law of the Sea 

Malaysia* Authorization required for nuclear 

powered ships to enter the territorial 

sea; authorization required for military 

maneuvers in the EEZ 

Maldives* Permission required for foreign vessels 

to enter EEZ 

Oman* Requirement for innocent passage 

through the Strait of Hormuz (an 

international strait) 

Philippines* Excessive archipelagic baselines 

Togo Excessive territorial sea clam 

* designates multiple challenges to the claim during FY 09 (1 Oct 08-30 Sep 09)
#### INSLEY MANUFACTURING CORPORATION v. MIMS CRANE SERVICE.

No. 39114.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 226 So.2d 836.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOverview and Evaluation of a Computational Bone Physiology Modeling Toolchain and Its Application to Testing of Exercise CountermeasuresProlonged microgravity exposure disrupts natural bone remodeling processes and can lead to a significant loss of bone strength, increasing injury risk during missions and placing astronauts at a greater risk of bone fracture later in life. Resistance-based exercise during missions is used to combat bone loss, but current exercise countermeasures do not completely mitigate the effects of microgravity. To address this concern, we present work to develop a personalizable, site-specific computational modeling toolchain of bone remodeling dynamics to understand and estimate changes in volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) in response to microgravity-induced bone unloading and in-flight exercise. The toolchain is evaluated against data collected from subjects in a 70-day bed rest study and is found to provide insight into the amount of exercise stimulus needed to minimize bone loss, quantitatively predicting post-study volumetric BMD of control subjects who did not perform exercise, and qualitatively predicting the effects of exercise. Results suggest that, with additional data, the toolchain could be improved to aid in developing customized in-flight exercise regimens and predict exercise effectiveness.Document ID20180004789Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSchepelmann, Alexander*(ZIN Technologies, Inc. Middleburg Heights, OH, United States)*Werner, Christopher R.*(ZIN Technologies, Inc. Middleburg Heights, OH, United States)*Pennline, James A.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Lewandowski, Beth E.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Mulugeta, Lealem*(Universities Space Research Association (USRA) Houston, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 30, 2018Publication DateAugust 1, 2018Subject CategoryAerospace MedicineReport/Patent NumberE-19552NASA/TM-2018-219938GRC-E-DAA-TN56704Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 836404.01.02.10CONTRACT_GRANT: NNJ11HE31ACONTRACT_GRANT: NNC14CA02CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180004789.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20190026643See AlsoOverview and Evaluation of a Computational Bone Physiology Modeling Toolchain and Its Application to Testing of Exercise Countermeasuresvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant-Appellee, v. George L. PINK, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 39129.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 27, 1970.

Rehearing Denied July 2, 1970.

Robert B. Kane, Tallahassee, for The Florida Bar, complainant-appellee.

Brian T. Hayes, Tallahassee, and H. L. Cooper, Jr., W. Palm Beach, for respondent-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

We have for consideration a judgment of the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar recommending disciplinary action against the respondent. This cause was initiated prior to institution of the new rules; see In re The Florida Bar, 225 So.2d 881 (Fla.1969).

The pertinent provisions of the judgment are as follows:

> “The Florida Bar’s Complaint charges that respondent received trust funds on behalf of clients in five separate cases and that he has failed to promptly account for said funds and disburse them according to his clients’ directions. It should be observed that the respondent was most cooperative in these proceedings and counsel were able to stipulate to a great deal of the record.

> “The amounts of money withheld were not great, but the seriousness of the offense should be recognized. Four of the charges involved mishandling of awards or settlements received by respondent’s clients in connection with automobile accident litigation. The fifth claim involved the proceeds of the sale of real estate which he handled as attorney for the executors of an estate. In each case the referee found that the respondent failed to properly handle such funds and to account to his clients. The referee did not find embezzlement or misappropriation of trust funds.

> “The Board of Governors approves the findings of fact of the referee. It is unable to approve of the recommendation of the referee of a private reprimand to be followed by a period of probation and supervision of the respondent’s practice.

> “Accordingly, the Board concurs in the referee’s findings of guilt and directs that this judgment of public reprimand be filed according to the Rule and that the respondent pay the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $529.50.”

Respondent has appeared before this Court with the argument that the Board of Governors was unjustified in increasing the discipline recommended by the referee since the recommended discipline was suggested by joint stipulation of counsel for the respondent and The Bar. However, we agree with the Board of Governors that respondent’s recent change of status from private practitioner to an official of the Industrial Relations Commission makes the recommended terms of probation impractical. The recommended discipline was for a public reprimand which *98was to be held in abeyance pending satisfaction of a strict probationary regimen; this regimen cannot now be administered. A different result might have obtained here had petitioner’s offenses not been so numerous.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed, and respondent is directed to bear the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $529.50. Publication of this opinion shall constitute sufficient reprimand.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., THORNAL, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., and MASON, Circuit Judge, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         178,942
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,736,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (460,359)
<INVENTORY>                                  9,002,737
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,363,301
<PP&E>                                       9,049,924
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,702,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,327,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,766,710
<BONDS>                                         45,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,612
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,780,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,327,915
<SALES>                                     58,764,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            58,764,518
<CGS>                                       26,400,787
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,400,787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            30,438,729
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (366,067)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             194,189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,890,120
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,086,934
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   803,186
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 21**
**SUBSIDIARIES OF DAVE & BUSTER’S, INC.**
1.  Dave & Buster’s of Illinois, Inc., an Illinois corporation 2.  Dave & Buster’s of Georgia, Inc., a Georgia corporation 3.  Dave & Buster’s of Pennsylvania, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation 4.  DANB Texas, Inc., a Texas corporation 5.  Dave & Buster’s of Maryland, Inc., a Maryland corporation 6.  Dave & Buster’s of California, Inc., a California corporation 7.  Dave & Buster’s of Colorado, Inc., a Colorado corporation 8.  Dave & Buster’s of New York, Inc., a New York corporation 9.  Dave & Buster’s of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation 10.  Dave & Buster’s of Pittsburgh, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation 11.  Dave & Buster’s of Hawaii, Inc., a Hawaii corporation 12.  D&B Leasing, Inc., a Texas corporation 13.  Dave & Buster’s I, L.P., a Texas limited partnership 14.  D&B Realty Holding, Inc., a Missouri corporation 15.  Tango Acquisition, Inc., a Delaware corporation 16.  Dave & Buster’s Management Corporation, a Delaware corporation 17.  6131646 Canada Inc., a Canadian corporation 18.  Tango of North Carolina, Inc., a Delaware corporation 19.  Tango of Tennessee, Inc., a Delaware corporation 20.  Tango of Arizona, Inc., a Delaware corporation 21.  Tango of Minnesota, Inc., a Delaware corporation 22.  Tango of Franklin, Inc., a Delaware corporation 23.  Tango of Farmingdale, Inc., a Delaware corporation 24.  Tango of Houston, Inc., a Delaware corporation 25.  Tango of Westbury, Inc., a Delaware corporation 26.  Tango of Arundel, Inc., a Delaware corporation 27.  Tango Entertainment Management Corporation, a Delaware corporation 28.  Tango License Corporation, a Delaware corporation 29.  Tango of Sugerloaf, Inc., a Delaware corporation