alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 May8, 2012

. ,. :I University

### of !: c, 0

## NORTJ-I ! ' 4.1 ._I**ALABA~1A**

Reference: DOT-OST-2008-0209, 2001-10685, 2009-0305, 2000-7856 EAS>Muscle Shoals, Al, Greenville, MS, laurel/Hattiesburg, MS and Tupelo, MS Dear Mr. DeVany, The University of North Alabama would like to offer strong support tothe proposal of Silver Airways to provide essential air service at Muscle Shoals as replacement for current Delta Air lines service. local air service that provides an effective connection tothe national and international airtransportation system is very critical tothe economic well-being ofthe Shoals area and especially to the University of North Alabama. Our enrollment at present is close to 7,000 students, manyflying in from various other states. Our international students represent over 50 foreign countries. Having local air service forthese students is vitally important as they travel from their homes tothe University and back home again. The Silver Airways proposals offers us a 34-seat turboprop aircraft and flights to Atlanta, which are the most popular route from the Shoals going to most destinations. We at the University of North Alabama believe the Silver Airways service proposals represent the best option for retaining our local air service longterm and building up traffic so that government subsidies can eventually be reduced or eliminated. We urge the Department ofTransportation to approve Silver Airways as the designated carrier to providethe Shoals essential air service
.

WGC,Jr./bb Sincerely,

# ~Jl_....:._~_**~.L,~** Dr. William G. Cale, Jr. President 

### OFFICE ofthe 

### PRESIDENT UNA Box 5004, Florence, AL 35632-0001 

### P: 256.765.4211 I 

### F: 256
.765.4644 I www.una.edu Equal Opportunity IEqual Access Institution
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tullys Coffee Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 15, 2009 (the Report), I, Andrew M. Wynne, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting
officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ ANDREW M. WYNNE                                                      
|Andrew M. Wynne                                                          
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting officer)
|January 15, 2009
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEFINA SON TECUM,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 18

- 71334

Agency No. A208

- 130

- 656

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 19, 2019 **

Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges

.

Josefina Son Tecum, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigrat ion Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum and withholding

of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

substantial evidence the agency ’s factual findi ngs

. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R . App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 26 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2006)

. We deny the petition for review

.

Son Tecum does not make any argument challenging the agency’s

dispositive conclusion that her proposed social group of “young school

- aged

women being targ eted by gangs” is not cognizable. See Martinez

- Serrano v. INS

,

94 F.3d 1256, 1259

- 60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in

a party’s opening brief are waived).

Even considering the claimed social group as one of “young school

- aged

women”, s ubstantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Son Tecum

failed to establish that she was or would be persecuted on account of her

membership in that group. See Zetino v. Holder , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir.

2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by

theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”).

Thus, Son Tecum’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
### Beach-area water supplies between Ocean City, Maryland and Rehoboth Beach, Delaware

By: Turbit H. Slaughter

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1619T

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### John HENNINGER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 38926.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 7, 1970.

Daniel S. Pearson, of Pearson & Josefs-berg, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*150BOYD, Justice.

This matter is before us on a motion of the State of Florida to dismiss the appeal filed herein by the appellant. The basis for the motion is that the notice of appeal required by Florida Appellate Rules was not filed within thirty days after appellant’s motion for new trial was denied on June 11, 1969.

Appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree without recommendation of mercy and sentenced to death. On June 11, 1969, the court-appointed attorneys who represented appellant at the trial were discharged by the court at their request. At that time, trial counsel notified the court that appellant wanted to appeal and was requesting appointment of counsel to handle the appeal. The court then declared appellant insolvent, but did not appoint other counsel until July 2, 1969, a period of twenty-one days after denying the motion for new trial.

At the time counsel was appointed to appeal the case, nine days remained within which to file a notice of appeal. Appellate counsel was under the impression, however, that a notice of appeal had already been filed by previous counsel. Notice of Appeal was not filed until July 30, 1969, after the expiration of the thirty-day period. Although notice of appeal was not timely filed, the appellant’s attorney did file motions for preparation of the trial transcript and for extension of time for filing assignments of error within the thirty-day appeal period.

Appellant contends that the filing of motions for preparation of transcript and extension of time within the thirty-day period constituted actual notice of appeal and that the filing of a formal notice of appeal was not necessary. We do not agree. The filing of notice of appeal is a prerequisite to every appeal. Timely notice of appeal vests jurisdiction of the cause in the proper appellate tribunal.1 It also serves the important function of notifying the opposing party and reviewing court that an appeal is intended.2

Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. However, we have determined that the ends of justice require that this Court treat the pleadings as a petition for writ of habeas corpus.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted and the Clerk directed to issue the writ forthwith.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS and DREW, JJ., dissent.

1

. Congregation Temple DeHirsch v. Aronson, 128 So.2d 585 (Fla.1961).

2

. Seaboard Airline R. R. Co. v. Holt, 80 So.2d 354 (Fla.1955).
#### George J. WILLIAMS v. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD FOR the CITY OF BATON ROUGE et al.

No. 11594.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Nov. 21, 1977.

*462Joseph P. Brantley, IV, Baton Rouge, of counsel, for plaintiff-appellee, George J. Williams.

Samuel R. Cicero, Baton Rouge, of counsel, for defendant-appellant Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. for the City of Baton Rouge, et al.

Before BLANCHE, COVINGTON and CHIASSON, JJ.

BLANCHE, Judge.

The Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, defendant-appellant, appeals from a decision under a rule nisi enjoining the Board from suspending or revoking the liquor license of George J. Williams, d/b/a Place Duplantier Club.

Following the receipt of a petition from numerous residents of Burgin Street and College Hill Place in Baton Rouge objecting to the continued operation of the Place Du-plantier Club, the Board held a public hearing on November 1, 1976, and revoked the license stating the licensed premises were being operated in a manner contrary to the general public welfare.

The same day the district court granted Williams’ petition for a temporary restraining order, and on November 19, 1976, a hearing on a rule nisi was conducted. Judge Eugene W. McGehee, in written reasons, commented that the court did not question the authority of the City of Baton Rouge to regulate businesses generally to insure they are operated in a manner not contrary to the general good, that authority being inherent under the police power of a municipality. He based his decision to enjoin the Board on his conclusion that the evidence adduced at the hearing failed to establish that Williams operated his business contrary to the general public welfare.

Although “contrary to the general public welfare” in such cases has not been defined by ordinance, statute or otherwise, the trial court did find that the evidence failed to support a finding that Williams was in violation of either local ordinances found in Title 9, Sections 9 and 11, of the City Code or state statutes found in LSA-R.S. 26:88 and 89. There is no error in this finding.

The testimony of the citizens in the area at the district court hearing leads us to believe that the tranquility of their lives was disturbed as a result of the noise created in the general vicinity of the Place Du-plantier Club. However, the evidence fails to establish that this inconvenience could be imputed to the manner in which Williams operated the business. Thus, we believe their inconvenience finds its source in the nature of the business which is licensed there rather than from the manner in which it was operated.

*463Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed, defendant-appellant to pay all costs of these proceedings.

AFFIRMED.
#### COSMOPOLITAN CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MERRITT ISLAND, a national bank, and City National Bank of Cocoa, a national bank, Appellees.

No. 69-189.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

April 25, 1969.

Appeal from Court of Record, Brevard County; Cecil R. Rosier, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 09-23810-CIV-HUCK/WHITE

GBEKE MICHAEL AWALA,

Petitioner,

vs.

IMMIGRATION JUDGE et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court upon Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (D.E. #1),

filed October 28, 2009. The Honorable Patrick A. White, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a

Report on the complaint (D.E. #3), filed December 29, 2009, recommending that this case be transferred

to a different venue.

Petitioner has not objected to the Report so he is not challenging the factual findings contained

in it. The Court has independently reviewed the Report, and the record. Being otherwise duly advised,

the Court adopts the findings of fact and conclusions as in the Report. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report is adopted and the Clerk shall transfer this case

to the District Court for York, Pennsylvania.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, Miami, Florida, January 27, 2010.

__________________________

PAUL C. HUCK

United States District Judge

Copies Furnished To:

Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White

All Counsel of Record

Case 4:10-cv-00498-JFM-SF Document 4 Filed 01/27/10 Page 1 of 1
1

Ngo, Dan (FAA)

From: Ngo, Dan (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 5:06 PM

To: 'fishfindersinc@gmail.com'

Subject: Request for Information - FAA-2015-4845

Dear Mr. Lowe: 

This letter is to inform you that we have received and reviewed your request for an exemption under 

Section 333, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-4845. Upon initial review, it was determined that more 

information was needed in order to move forward with your request. This information is necessary for 

the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your request. 

 Please clarify the power source (i.e. battery/gas/propane-powered) for the aircraft below. The 

list represents an initial assessment of the aircraft that the FAA is unable to move forward with.

1. Aeroval Flexrotor 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. 

Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information 

(and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via 

e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must 

receive the information described above by January 27, 2016. If we do not receive the information, 

we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

Regards, 

Dan Ngo 

Office of Rulemaking, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division 

Federal Aviation Administration
#### Jerry ROBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-47.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

July 3, 1969.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender and Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty, Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*454PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record in this cause having been read and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment appealed is hereby affirmed. Shepard v. State, 213 So.2d 11 (Fla.App.2d, 1968).

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24401]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PEACE CORPS


Information Collection Requests Under OMB Review

ACTION: Notice of public use form review request to the Office of 
Management and Budget.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1981 (44 U.S.C., 
Chapter 35), the Peace Corps is requesting emergency approval and 
clearance from the Office of Management and Budget for the Immigrants & 
Refugees Questionnaire to be used by the Office of Domestic Programs. A 
copy of the information collection may be obtained from Rosyln Docktor, 
Office of Domestic Programs, Peace Corps, 1990 K St., NW, Washington, 
DC 20526. Ms. Docktor may be called at (202) 606-3779. Peace Corps 
invites comments on whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for proper performance of the functions of the Peace Corps, 
including whether the information will have practical use; the accuracy 
of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of 
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions 
used; ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and, ways to minimize the burden of the 
collection of information on those who are to respond, including 
through the use of automated collection techniques, when appropriate, 
and other forms of information technology.
    Comments on this form should be addressed to Victoria Becker 
Wassmer, Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, NEOB, 
Washington, DC 20503.

INFORMATION COLLECTION ABSTRACT:

    Title: Program to Assist Immigrants & Refugees Questionnaire.
    Need for and use of the Information: This form is completed 
voluntarily by Returned Peace Corps Volunteers. This information will 
be used by Domestic Programs to identify individuals interested in 
assisting immigrant and refugee groups throughout the country. 
Enrollment in this program also fulfills the third goal of Peace Corps 
as required by Congressional legislation and to enhance the Office of 
Domestic Programs global education programs.
    Respondents: Returned Peace Corps Volunteers.
    Respondents obligation to reply: Voluntary.
    Burden on the Public:
      a. Annual reporting burden: 434 hrs.
      b. Annual record keeping burden: 0 hrs.
      c. Estimated average burden per response: 10 min.
      d. Frequency of response: one time.
      e. Estimated number of likely respondents: 2600.
      f. Estimated cost to respondents: $3.35.

    This notice is issued in Washington, DC on September 9, 1997.
Stanley D. Suyat,
Associate Director for Management.
    Certified to be a true copy of the original document.
Brian Sutherland,
Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-24401 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6501-01-M
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.13    
  


 
  First Amendment    
  


        This is the first amendment to the Promissory Note ("Note") dated September 24, 2001 between RevCare, Inc. ("RevCare") and Russ Mohrmann and Manny Occiano
(collectively "Holder") wherein Holder agrees to extend the maturity date of the Note to January 2, 2003. 


        All
other terms and conditions contained in the original Note remain in full force and effect. 



	Manny Occiano	 	Dated
	

Russ Mohrmann	
 	

Dated
	

RevCare, Inc.	
 	

 
	

Fred McGee, CFO	
 	

Dated











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.13


First Amendment
Case 05-14742-WWB Doc 60 Filed 09/07/06 Entered 09/07/06 14:40:42 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 4
Case 05-14742-WWB Doc 60 Filed 09/07/06 Entered 09/07/06 14:40:42 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 4
Case 05-14742-WWB Doc 60 Filed 09/07/06 Entered 09/07/06 14:40:42 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 4
Case 05-14742-WWB Doc 60 Filed 09/07/06 Entered 09/07/06 14:40:42 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 4
;

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Bombardier Glenn Baxter, Paul- 5121/09 No objection

Aerospace Andre Brossard·

Jaimes, Jr.

Transport Canada Anthony Wan 5/26/09 No objection

National Business Elias Cotti, Manager 5121/09 No objection

Aireaft Assoc Technical Services

(NBAA)

- .--

"
### Surface water supply of the United States, 1946, Part XI, Pacific slope basins in California

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1061

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### Ground water in southeastern Nevada

By: Everett Carpenter

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp365

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.