alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  I, Dempsey Mork, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report for the period ended March 31, 2009 on Form 10-Q of China Holdings, Inc.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Nov. 19, 2009  /s/ Dempsey Mork Dempsey Mork Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49699]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25258]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date of Meeting: November 3, 1997.
    Time: 8:00 A.M. to adjournment.
    Place of Meeting: Residence Inn, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Ronald Suddendorf, Ph.d., 6000 Executive Boulevard, 
Suite 409, Rockville MD 20892-7003, 301-443-2926.

    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date of Meeting: November 3, 1997.
    Time: 12:00 P.M. to 1:00 P.M.
    Place of Meeting: Residence Inn, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Ronald Suddendorf, Ph.d., 6000 Executive Boulevard, 
Suite 409, Rockville MD 20892-7003, 301-443-2926.
    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. The proposal 
and discussions could reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the proposal, the disclosure of 
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.

(Catalog of Federal domestic Assistance, Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; and 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; National Institutes of Health.)

    Dated: September 17, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-25258 Filed 9-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### SINGLETON v. WILLIAMS.

No. 38899.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 224 So.2d 813.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1)     | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)     | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material                respects the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                               |         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|
|   |                                                                                                               | /s/ Erna Gao |
|   | Erna                    GaoChief                    Financial OfficerDate: August                    13, 2007 |

----
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03095

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 03095\03095_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03095\03095_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03095\03095_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03095\03095_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03095\03095_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03095\03095_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03095\03095_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03095\03095_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03095\Supplemental Documents\03095 follow up questions.doc Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 03095\Supplemental Documents\03095 steam electric ICR questionnaire follow up.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x x 03095\Supplemental Documents\D-1 Merrimack Station WWT-A.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 03095\Supplemental Documents\D-2 Merrimack Station POND-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03095\Supplemental Documents\MAP-1 Merrimack Station Facility Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 03095\Supplemental Documents\MAP-2 Merrimack Station Facility Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 03095\Supplemental Documents\WB-1 Merrimack Station water balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03095\Supplemental Documents\CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24295]



[[Page 48261]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE


Defense Special Weapons Agency

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Special Weapons Agency, DOD.
ACTION: Notice to amend a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Special Weapons Agency is amending an entry in a 
system of records notice subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 
552a), as amended. The system of records notice is identified as HDSWA 
017, entitled Voluntary Leave Sharing Program Records published on 
March 24, 1997, at 62 FR 13873. Under Routine uses, the third 
paragraph, second line, fourth word should read `DSWA's'.
DATES: This action will be effective September 15, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to General Counsel, Defense Special Weapons 
Agency, 6801 Telegraph Road, Alexandria, VA 22310-3398.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Sandy Barker at (703) 325-7681.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Special Weapons Agency notices 
for systems of records subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 
552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are 
available from the address above.
    The Defense Special Weapons Agency is amending an entry in a system 
of records notice subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), 
as amended. The system of records notice is identified as HDSWA 017, 
entitled Voluntary Leave Sharing Program Records published on March 24, 
1997, at 62 FR 13873. Under Routine uses, the third paragraph, second 
line, fourth word should read `DSWA's'.
    Dated: September 9, 1997.

L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-24295 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-F
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49671-49672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25186]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Satellite Reconnaissance

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Satellite 
Reconnaissance will meet in closed session on October 8-9, October 24, 
and December 8, 1997 at Headquarters NRO, Chantilly, Virginia.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings the 
Task Force will review the operational, technical, industrial, and 
financial aspects of the following and recommend a course of action for 
the Department: the National Reconnaissance Office's (NRO) is creating 
a Future Imager Architecture as a basis for acquiring the next 
generation of imaging satellite systems and their associated ground 
control and processing; and in parallel, DARPA is advocating the 
development and demonstration of a Surveillance and Targeting Light 
Satellite (Starlite) System with attributes that may not be included in 
NRO's architecture.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that these DSB Task Force meetings concern matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly these 
meetings will be closed to the public.


[[Page 49672]]


    Dated: September 18, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-25186 Filed 9-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
#### Dennis L. THOMPSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1250.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 8, 1971.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Lewis S. Kimler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Bruce L, Scheiner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Upon this record it is clear that this appellant was caught in the act of stealing 28 pair of pants and eights shirts from a retail store. He was found guilty of grand larceny, adjudicated guilty and sentenced. On this appeal, he urges that the value of the merchandise was not proven to be more than $100.00 as required by the grand larceny statute. The appeal is wholly groundless because; (1) an employee of the store testified to a retail value of more than $400.00 and a wholesale value of more than $100.00, and (2) the retail price tags were admitted into evidence. Cf. Lauder v. State, 233 Md. 142, 195 A.2d 610, (1963).

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24684]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (The New York Times Company, Class A Common Stock, 
$0.10 Par Value) File No. 1-5837

September 11, 1997.
    The New York Times Company (``Company'') has filed an application 
with Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and rule 
12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the American 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'' or ``Exchange'').
    The reasons cited in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, it believes that listing the Security on 
the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE'') will provide the Company 
with a higher profile venue for trading and that the holders of the 
Security will benefit from access to the larger trading market offered 
by the NYSE.
    The Company has complied with Amex Rule 18 by filing with the 
Exchange a certified copy of the resolutions adopted by the Board of 
Directors of the Company authorizing the withdrawal of the Security 
from listing and registration on the Amex, and a statement of Mr. 
Solomon B. Watson IV, the Senior Vice President and General Counsel of 
the Company, setting forth in detail the reasons for such proposed 
withdrawal, and the facts in support thereof.
    Any interested person may, on or before October 2, 1997, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
exchange and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matters.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24684 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Incorporation by Reference Docket ID No. EPA - HQ - OAR- 2011 - 0512

July 26 , 2011 The c ontents of the following docket s are hereb y incorporated b y reference into and are considered to be included in, contained in and to have been placed in Docket EPA - HQ - OAR 2011 - 0512 ( Technical Revisions for Subpart Iand W of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule): 1) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2008 - 0508 (Greenhouse Gas Mandatory Reporting) 2) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0923 (Oil and Natural Gas Systems) 3) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0924 (Determination of Confidential Bus iness Information) 4) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0926 (Carbon Dioxide Injection and Geologic Sequestration) 5) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0927 (Additional Sources of Fluorinated Gases) 6) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0925 (Corporate Parent and NAI CS Code in the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule) 7) EPA - HQ - OAR- 2011 - 0417 ( Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Petroleum and Natural Gas S ys tems, Subpart W: Extension of 2011 BAMM Deadlines ) Accessing dockets: Publicly available docket materials are available either electronicall y through www.regulati ons.gov or in hard cop y at EPA’s Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Av enue, NW, Washington, DC 20004. This Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566 - 1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566 - 1742.
EXHIBIT 12.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I,
Zeinal Abedin Mahommed Bava, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the company and have:



5.     The
company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors
and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 27, 2009

|    |  |                                                                                                  |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ ZEINAL ABEDIN MAHOMMED BAVA Name:  Zeinal Abedin Mahommed Bava
Title:Chief Executive Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1490

In re: HOWARD WHITE , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 1:18

- cv - 00214

- AJT

- MSN )

Submitted : June 14, 2018 Decided: June 18, 2018

Before TRAXLER, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Howard White, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Howard White petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to hold an evidentiary hearing in his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) proceeding and directing various individuals to present evidence in that proceeding. We conclude that White is not entitled to man damus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v.
Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003). Mandamus relief is available o nly when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan
Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by White is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. Because White fails to demonstrate “exceptional circumstances where ac tion by a panel would be impractical due to the requirements of time,” as necessary to warrant consideration by a single judge, see 4th Cir. R. 27(e), we deny White’s “motion for expedited emergency hearing.” We dispense with oral argument because the fac ts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
#### ART CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Jack JACKSON, Appellee.

No. 77-2213.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 22, 1978.

Pyszka, Kessler, Adams *&*Solomon, Miami, for appellants.

Errol S. Cornell, Coral Gables, for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, NATHAN and KE-HOE, JJ.

*393PER CURIAM.

The employer and its compensation insurer appeal the allowance of an attorney’s fee upon employee’s petition pursuant to Section 440.24, Florida Statutes (1977), to enforce a workman’s compensation award. The award was paid after the petition was filed and before the issuance of the rule nisi. The issue before the court was whether the tardy payment was caused by the insurance company or the claimant’s failure to submit proper bills. The trial court determined this issue adversely to the company and we find no basis for this court to substitute its judgment for that of the trial court. Cf. *Lillard v. City of Miami,*220 So.2d 413 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969).

Affirmed.