alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Slip Op. 04-26
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

___________________________________ : SHINYEI CORPORATION OF AMERICA, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Court No. 00-00130 : UNITED STATES, et. al., : : Defendant. : ___________________________________:

ORDER
This matter comes before the Court pursuant to the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) in Shinyei Corp. of Am. v. United States , 355 F.3d 1297 (Fed. Cir. 2004), and the CAFC mandate of March 12, 2004, reversing and remanding the judgment of the Court in Shinyei Corp. of Am. v. United States , 27 CIT ___, ___, 248 F. Supp. 2d 1350.
The CAFC held that this Court erred in granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the action pursuant to USCIT R. 12(b)(1). Accordingly, it is hereby
O RDE RED that plaintiff proceed with the merits of the case consistent with the CAFC’s opinion.

/s/ NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS SENIOR JUDGE
Dated: March 22, 2004

New York, New York
II 

Calendar No. 489 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2796 

[Report No. 118–211] 

To provide for the equitable settlement of certain Indian land disputes 

regarding land in Illinois, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. MULLIN (for himself, Ms. DUCKWORTH, and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 

Reported by Mr. SCHATZ, without amendment 

A BILL 

To provide for the equitable settlement of certain Indian 

land disputes regarding land in Illinois, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS. 

4 (a) JURISDICTION CONFERRED ON THE UNITED

5 STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS.— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2796 RS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

2 provision of law, the United States Court of Federal 

3 Claims shall have jurisdiction to hear, determine, 

4 and render judgment on a land claim of the Miami 

5 Tribe of Oklahoma under its Treaty with the United 

6 States of America signed at Grouseland August 21, 

7 1805 (7 Stat. 91) (commonly known as the ‘‘Treaty 

8 of Grouseland’’), without regard to the statute of 

9 limitations, including section 2501 of title 28, 

10 United States Code, and any delay-based defense, no 

11 matter how characterized. 

12 (2) JURISDICTION EXPIRATION.—Not later 

13 than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, 

14 the jurisdiction conferred to the United States Court 

15 of Federal Claims under paragraph (1) shall expire 

16 unless the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma files a land 

17 claim under that paragraph. 

18 (b) EXTINGUISHMENT OF TITLE AND CLAIMS.—Ex19 cept for a claim filed under subsection (a)(1), all other 

20 claims, including any and all future claims, of the Miami 

21 Tribe of Oklahoma, or any member, descendant, or prede22 cessor in interest to the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma, to land 

23 in the State of Illinois are extinguished. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 489 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2796 

[Report No. 118–211] 

A BILL 

To provide for the equitable settlement of certain 

and for other purposes. Indian land disputes regarding land in Illinois, 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
#### Thomas L. ANDRIES and Doris P. Andries v. PEYTON BUILDERS, INC.

No. 45526.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 24, 1969.

Waller, Pritchard & Fox, Barry H. Powell, Jackson, for appellant.

W. E. Gore, Jr., Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
S. 205

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

An Act

To authorize the American Battle Monuments Commission to establish in the State

of Louisiana a memorial to honor the Buffalo Soldiers.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Buffalo Soldiers Commemoration

Act of 2005’’.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF BUFFALO SOLDIERS MEMORIAL.

(a) AUTHORIZATION.—The American Battle Monuments

Commission is authorized to establish a memorial to honor the

Buffalo Soldiers in or around the City of New Orleans on land

donated for such purpose or on Federal land with the consent

of the appropriate land manager.

(b) CONTRIBUTIONS.—The Commission shall solicit and accept

contributions for the construction and maintenance of the memorial.

(c) COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS.—The Commission may enter

into a cooperative agreement with a private or public entity for

the purpose of fundraising for the construction and maintenance

of the memorial.

(d) MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT.—Prior to beginning construction

of the memorial, the Commission shall enter into an agreement

with an appropriate public or private entity to provide for the

permanent maintenance of the memorial and shall have sufficient

funds, or assurance that it will receive sufficient funds, to complete

the memorial.

SEC. 3. BUFFALO SOLDIERS MEMORIAL ACCOUNT.

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Commission shall maintain an

escrow account (‘‘account’’) to pay expenses incurred in constructing

the memorial.

(b) DEPOSITS INTO THE ACCOUNT.—The Commission shall

deposit into the account any principal and interest by the United

States that the Chairman determines has a suitable maturity.

(c) USE OF ACCOUNT.—Amounts in the account, including proceeds of any investments, may be used to pay expenses incurred

in establishing the memorial. After construction of the memorial

amounts in the account shall be transferred by the Commission

to the entity providing for permanent maintenance of the memorial

under such terms and conditions as the Commission determines

will ensure the proper use and accounting of the amounts.
S. 205—2

SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may

be necessary to carry out this Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
The following ex parte communication occurred on July 16, 2014, concerning Notice for 

Proposed Rulemaking: Harmonization of Airworthiness Standards—Fire Extinguishers and Class 

B and F Cargo Compartments.

Question from Dan Glucksman – International Safety Equipment Association

From: Dan Glucksman

Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 7:42 AM

To: Happenny, Stephen (FAA)

Subject: Question about the Fire Extinguishers Rule...

Dear Mr. Happenny,

Does the new proposed rule, “Harmonization of Airworthiness Standards—Fire Extinguishers and 

Class B and F Cargo Compartments,” address breathing systems for those who might have to 

use the fire extinguishers?

I ask because I didn’t see it in the proposed rule, but I wanted to double check.

Thank you,

Daniel Glucksman

Public Affairs Director

International Safety Equipment Association

703-525-1695–office

The FAA provided the following information on July 16, 2014

From: Happenny, Stephen (FAA) 

Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 10:13 AM

To: Dan Glucksman

Subject: Response to your inquiry about the Fire Extinguishers Rule...

Hello Mr. Glucksman,

The new proposed rule does not include any regulatory language or guidance on specific 

breathing systems (e.g., PBEs) that may be used. As you will recall in the NPRM, we do note 

that a trained crewmember (e.g., Flight Attendant) would be expected to don some type of 

protective breathing equipment (PBE) but that is the extent of the description on PBE. In the 

draft AC 25.857-X we only reference the § 25.1439; and, if the airplane is operated under part 

121, § 121.337. However, again, those references are the extent of the material provided in this 

proposed rulemaking on breathing systems. 

Thank you for your interest in aviation safety. If you have additional questions, please contact 

me as shown below.

Regards,

Stephen Happenny

Senior Aerospace Engineer / Safety Engineer Environmental Control Systems & Fire Protection 

Systems

ANM-112 Mechanical Systems

FAA Transport Airplane Directorate
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-40502 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. CESAR MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:11-CR-92-1

Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal P ublic Defender appo i n t e d to represent Cesar M endozaHernandez has moved f or leave to withdraw and h as filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 ( 1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mendoza-Hernandez h as not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the r elevant p ortions of the record reflected therein. We c oncur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2. U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 3, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-40502 Document: 00512196632 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/03/2013
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
     In connection with the T REIT, Inc. (the “Company”) Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Hutton,Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:
     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.    By:/s/ RICHARD HUTTON    Richard Hutton  *Interim Chief Financial Officer*
Date: November 14, 2003
### Rainwater as a chemical agent of geologic processes; a review

By: Dorothy Carroll

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1535G

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas
W. Fry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:




(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





March 25,
2010


By
                /s/ Thomas W. FryThomas
      W. Fry, Chief Financial
Officer
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 24 - 0131

_________________ STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JAMES LANI KUA KAA PANO MASON,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ The record was filed for purposes of this appeal on March 7 , 2024 . Nothing further has been filed, and the opening brief is now overdue. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file , and serve the opening brief on appeal no later than May 23 , 2 024 . F ailure to file the brief within that time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 23 2024

04/23/2024
Case Number: DA 24-0131
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2760 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2760

  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to cap credit card interest rates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 2023

  Mr. Hawley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Truth in Lending Act to cap credit card interest rates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Capping Credit Card Interest Rates 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CAP ON CREDIT CARD INTEREST RATES.

    Section 107 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1606) is amended 
by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f)(1) The annual percentage rate applicable to an extension of 
credit obtained by use of a credit card may not exceed 18 percentage 
points, inclusive of all finance charges.
    ``(2) Any fees that are not considered finance charges under 
section 106(a) may not be used to evade the limitations of this 
paragraph, and the total sum of such fees may not exceed the total 
amount of finance charges assessed.
    ``(3) Any creditor who violates this subsection shall be subject to 
the provisions of section 130.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 185 (Wednesday, September 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50048-50049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25352]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub No. 5) (97-4)]


Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board has approved a fourth quarter 1997 rail cost 
adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of 
American Railroads. The fourth quarter 1997 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.104. 
The fourth quarter 1997 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.738. The fourth quarter 
1997 RCAF-5 is 0.718.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 1997.


[[Page 50049]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: H. Jeff Warren, (202) 565-1549. TDD 
for the hearing impaired: (202) 565-1695.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: DC NEWS & DATA, INC., Suite 210, 1925 
K Street, NW, Washington, DC 20423, telephone (202) 289-4357. 
(Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through TDD services 
(202) 565-1695.)
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or energy conservation.
    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    Decided: September 18, 1997.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25352 Filed 9-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,826
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,990
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,490
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,990
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,361
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,361)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.003)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 185 (Wednesday, September 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49966-49967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25294]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-47-001]


MIGC, Inc.; Notice of Compliance Filing

September 18, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 12, 1997, MIGC, Inc. (MIGC) tendered 
for filing to as part of its FERC Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, 
Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 4, to become effective October 1, 
1997.
    MIGC states that the instant filing is being submitted to reflect 
Annual Charge Adjustment unit charges applicable to transportation 
services during the fiscal year commencing October 1, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests must be 
filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the

[[Page 49967]]

Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25294 Filed 9-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 00-5296.

#### Dore *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Apprendi*v. *New Jersey,*530 U. S. 466 (2000).