alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1


                               CERTIFICATION UNDER
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



To my knowledge, this Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended September 30,
2002,  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information  contained in this Report
fairly presents, in all material respects,  the consolidated financial condition
and results of operations of Central Bancorp, Inc.



                                  By:/s/ John D. Doherty
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                     John D. Doherty
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer



                                  By:/s/ Michael K. Devlin
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                     Michael K. Devlin
                                     Senior Vice President, Treasurer
                                     and Chief Financial Officer


Date:  November 14, 2002
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2736 

To clarify that section 8526(7) of the Elementary and Secondary Education 

Act of 1965 does not apply with respect to the use of funds for sports 

clubs, teams, training, or related activities provided for students. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2023 

Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. BUDD, Mr. 

COTTON, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. DAINES, Ms. ERNST, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. GRAHAM, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. 

MARSHALL, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. RICKETTS, Mr. RISCH, Mr. 

ROUNDS, Mr. SCHMITT, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mr. WICKER, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. 

CRAMER, Mr. THUNE, Ms. COLLINS, and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To clarify that section 8526(7) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 does not apply with respect to the use of funds for sports clubs, teams, training, or related activities provided for students. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2736 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Allowing for Rec3 reational Resources for Outdoor Wellness Act’’ or the 

4 ‘‘ARROW Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION. 

6 Section 8526(7) of the Elementary and Secondary 

7 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7906(7)) is amended 

8 by inserting ‘‘, except that this paragraph shall not apply 

9 to the use of funds under this Act for sports clubs, teams, 

10 training, or related activities provided for students’’ before 

11 the period at the end. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-24-00164-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF W.T., A.T., R.T., S.B., E.B., Children

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas

Trial Court No. CVW2300095

Honorable Melissa Uram-Degerolami, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ, JUSTICE VALENZUELA, AND JUSTICE BRISSETTE

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED. 

Appellants are indigent. No costs are assessed. 

SIGNED August 28, 2024.

_____________________________

Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****AsAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of PooreBrothers, Inc. (the “Company”), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Reportof the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 25,2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of the Company. This written statement is being furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-K.A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date: March 22, 2005 | By:    | /s/    Thomas W. Freeze                                                                         |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                                                                                                |
|                      |   | Thomas W. Freeze,  President and Chief Executive Officer  (principal executive officer)                             |
|                      |   |                                                                                                                |
| Date: March 22, 2005 | By:    | /s/    Richard M.  Finkbeiner                                                                   |
|                      |   |                                                                                                                |
|                      |   | Richard M. Finkbeiner  Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  (principal financial and accounting officer) |

 

----
UAS Specifications:

Model DJI F450 DJI F550 AD8-HL

Take-off Weight 1730 grams 2254 grams 5302 grams

Diagonal Width 28 inches 32 inches 45 inches

Height 10 inches 12.5 inches 18 inches

Number of rotors 4 6 8

Autonomous 

flight capable

Return To Home

Capable

Programmable 

Flight Capable

Programmable 

Flight Capable
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1343

GRACE J. HADEED; JOAN WINTER,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

THOMAS ABRAHAM; GLENDA ABRAHAM,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-02-695-2)

Submitted: October 31, 2005 Decided: January 12, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John B. Mann, LEVIT & MANN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellants. L. Steven Emmert, SYKES, BOURDON, AHERN & LEVY, P.C.,

Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Grace J. Hadeed and Joan Winter appeal from the district

court’s order granting Thomas and Glenda Abraham’s motion for

additional fees and costs under the fee-shifting provisions of the

Fair Housing Act, see 42 U.S.C. § 3613(c)(2) (2000). Hadeed and

Winter assert that our denial of sanctions under Rule 38 of the

Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in their prior appeal, see

Hadeed v. Abraham, 103 F. App. 706 (4th Cir. June 30, 2004)

(unpublished), precluded the district court from awarding

additional fees and costs associated with the Abrahams’ defense of

that appeal. Because Hadeed and Winter raise that issue for the

first time on appeal, we decline to address it. See Brickwood

Contractors, Inc. v. Datanet Eng’g, Inc., 369 F.3d 385, 390 (4th

Cir. 2004) (en banc) (stating general rule that appellate court

generally does not consider issues raised for first time on appeal

and noting exception not applicable here). Moreover, Hadeed and

Winter do not challenge the grounds on which the district court

relied to impose additional attorney’s fees and costs. See United

States v. Al-Hamdi, 356 F.3d 564, 571 n.8 (4th Cir. 2004) (“It is

a well settled rule that contentions not raised in the argument

section of the opening brief are abandoned.”). Thus, they have

waived appellate review of the court’s order.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and

deny the Abrahams’ motion to dismiss the appeal. We grant the
- 3 -

Abrahams’ motion for Rule 38 sanctions and order Hadeed and Winter

to pay $6525 in attorney’s fees and $562.40 in costs. Finally, we

grant the Abrahams’ motion to strike from the joint appendix Hadeed

and Winter’s motion to dismiss the Abrahams’ motion for additional

fees and costs on the ground that it was not filed in the district

court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2171 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act to reauthorize the temporary mortgage and rental payments program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 21, 2005 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to reauthorize the temporary mortgage and rental payments program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mortgage and Rental 

5 Assistance Reauthorization Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) The mortgage and rental assistance pro9 gram was authorized under the Robert T. Stafford 

10 Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
2 

•S 2171 IS

1 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) to provide assistance to individ2 uals who have lost a portion of their income and are 

3 having difficulties paying their rents or mortgages. 

4 (2) The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (Pub5 lic Law 106–390) amended the Stafford Act to end 

6 the program in May 2002. 

7 (3) Following the major disaster declaration re8 sulting from the terrorist attacks in New York on 

9 September 11, 2001, the Federal Emergency Man10 agement Agency allowed the use of funds under the 

11 program to aid residents who were having difficulties 

12 paying their rents or mortgages. 

13 (4) The program should be reauthorized to 

14 allow the Federal Government to provide direct 

15 housing assistance to those who have been displaced 

16 by Hurricane Katrina. 

17 SEC. 3. TEMPORARY MORTGAGE RENTAL ASSISTANCE. 

18 Section 408(c)(1) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

19 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

20 5174(c)(1)) is amended— 

21 (1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as sub22 paragraph (C); and 

23 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the fol24 lowing: 
3 

•S 2171 IS

1 ‘‘(B) TEMPORARY MORTGAGE AND RENTAL

2 PAYMENTS.— 

3 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The President is 

4 authorized to provide assistance on a tem5 porary basis in the form of mortgage or 

6 rental payments to, or on behalf of, an in7 dividual who, as a result of financial hard8 ship caused by a major disaster, receives 

9 written notice of dispossession of or evic10 tion from a residence by reason of a fore11 closure of any mortgage or lien, cancella12 tion of any contract of sale, or termination 

13 of any lease, entered into prior to such 

14 major disaster. 

15 ‘‘(ii) DURATION OF ASSISTANCE.— 

16 The assistance authorized under this sub17 paragraph shall be provided for the dura18 tion of the period of financial hardship, but 

19 such period shall not exceed 18 months.’’. 

20 SEC. 4. APPLICABILITY. 

21 The amendments made by section 3 shall apply with 

22 respect to any major disaster occurring on or after August 

23 24, 2005. 

Æ
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23

- 0471

_________________ BRENDA ZASTOUPIL,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE APPEALS BOARD, AND RYAN RESTAURANT CORPORATI ON,

Respondents and Appellees. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five

- justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to p rovide a copy hereof to Brenda Zastoupil, Ryan Restaurant Corporation, all counsel of record , and to the Honorable Nickolas C. Murnion , District Judge

. For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 22 2024

05/22/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0471
THEAITORNEY GENERAL 

OF TEXAS 

Honorable H. A. Hodges 

County Auditor, WillMmson County 

Ge&+mm, Texas 

Dear Sir: : 0pinion,No. O-7087 

Re: If?municipal bonds held by the 

County Iilprovements Fund, are 

sold, may the premium from such 

bond8 be lnve8ted in U. S. 

Government Bonds? 

We acknowledge re&pt of yc$ opinion request of recent date, end quote 

from letter, (18 follows: 

'IThia County'8 Permanent School Fund ownm quite a lot of Municipal 

Bon&a for which an offer of rreieral hundred dollerr premium has be-. 

made, if the rale lr made the principal and the premium ~111 be 

inverted lz'b. 5. Government Bon&, by the Inverting of the premirrm 

In bonda there will be good findnclal gein over the maturity of the 

bon& rold. 

. 

"An the law directa the interert and leare money, except oil anu.. 

mineral leaae6, be trsnnferred to the State and County Available 

School Fund for appor:~kkmmnn~ -to the various Conrmon and Independent 

School Diatricte on a'per capita rcholsrtlc berir it bar occurred to 

me that premlunu on bonda may be held a8 Interest, if 110 the law 

would not permit the une of the premium to purchase additional bon&. 

“Kindly give me an opinion rtating whether or not the Commidlionere' 

Court would be authorized under the law to Invest the premium of bOnda 

mold in the purchase of bonda for the use and benefit of the County 

Permanent School Fund?" 

The Attorney General'8 office held in Opinion Number O-823, copy of which 

is enclosed, that profit derived from purchase, sale, and reinvestment of 

the cash in the Permanent School Fund of a county should become-a part of 

the Available Fund (citing Art. 7, Section 6, Constitution of Texas). 

In line with that opinion, we believe that the premium received from the 

sale of bonds held by the Permanent School Fund becomes a part of the 

Available Fund. 
Hon. H. A. Hodgee - Pege 2 (O-7087) 

You are advieed, therefore, that the Commieeionere' Court would not'be 

authorized under the law to Invest the premium from bonde aold in the 

purcheee of bonds for the use and bei$efit of the County Permanent School 

Fund. 

Very truly youre, 

ATTORNEX -oFTExAs 

a/ Claud 0. Boothmen 

COB: v/ldw 

Enclosure 1 

APPROVED FEB. 23, 1946 

CARLas c . ~'TCSHIEY 

FIRST ASSISTANT 

A!lTORNEYGENEBAL 

APPROVED OPINION COMMITTEE 

By B. W. B. 

CHAIRMAN 

By 

Claud 0. Boothman 

Assistant
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2




                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
LeCroy Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-03144 and 333-91833) on Form S-8 and to the registration statements
(Nos. 333-64848 and 333-43690) on Form S-3 of LeCroy Corporation of our report
dated August 5, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of LeCroy
Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then
ended, and the related financial statement schedule for the year ended June 30,
2003, which report appears in the June 30, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K/A of
LeCroy Corporation.



/s/ KPMG LLP


Short Hills, New Jersey
February 9, 2004
#### LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. David Leon SCHWARTZ, Respondent.

No. 57090.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

PETITION FOR LEAVE TO RESIGN, TO SURRENDER LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW AND TO HAVE STRICKEN HIS NAME FROM THE ROLL OF ATTORNEYS DISBARMENT ON CONSENT

TO THE HONORABLE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA THROUGH THE COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION

The Petition of David Leon Schwartz, Respondent herein, appearing herein personally, with respect represents.

I.

That David Leon Schwartz was admitted to practice law in the State of Louisiana on June 8, 1959.

II.

That David Leon Schwartz was convicted of a felony in the United States District Court of the Northern District of Texas, all as set forth in Petitioner’s “Motion and Order for Suspension from the Practice of Law” filed in this Honorable Court on November 10, 1975, and docketed under the above number and made a part hereof by reference.

III.

That on November 13, 1975, this Court did, by Order, suspend from the practice of law David Leon Schwartz and did order Petitioner to institute disciplinary proceedings against David Leon Schwartz, which action was filed under this Docket Number on January 14, 1976.

IV.

That at Respondent’s request, the foregoing disciplinary proceedings were postponed until Respondent was released from federal confinement.

V.

That upon Respondent’s release and upon motion of the Louisiana State Bar Association, Paul B. Deal was appointed this Court’s Commissioner.

VI.

That David Leon Schwartz acknowledges that his said conviction is now final.

VII.

That David Leon Schwartz acknowledges that his conviction was of a serious offense, a felony, and one that indicates that he lacks the moral fitness to practice law.

VIII.

David Leon Schwartz herein petitions this Court for leave to resign, to surrender his license to practice law, and to have his name stricken from the rolls of attorneys and thereby be disbarred on his consent.

IX.

David Leon Schwartz acknowledges and declares that his disbarment on consent is freely and voluntarily submitted; it is not the result of coercion or duress and David Leon Schwartz is fully aware of the impli-; cations of his disbarment on consent.

WHEREFORE, David Leon Schwartz prays that he be allowed to surrender his license, that same be revoked and cancelled, and further, that his name be stricken from the rolls of attorneys authorized to practice law in the State of Louisiana thus resulting in his disbarment on his own consent.

*544ORDER

The foregoing Petition, the premises, and the law considered:

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED

That David Leon Schwartz be allowed to surrender his license to practice law; that the name of David Leon Schwartz be stricken from the Rolls of Attorneys thus resulting in the disbarment of David Leon Schwartz on his consent.

JOE W. SUMMERS Chief Justice

FRANK W. SUMMERS Associate Justice

ALBERT TATE Associate Justice

JOHN A. DIXON Associate Justice

PASCAL F. CALOGERO Associate Justice

WALTER F. MARCUS Associate Justice

JAMES L. DENNIS Associate Justice
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                Percentage Ownership
                                                                --------------------
<S>                                                             <C>
DIRECT  SUBSIDIARIES
--------------------

Value Network Service, Inc. a Delaware corporation                              100%
Florists' Transworld Delivery, Inc., a Michigan corporation                     100%
FTD International, Inc., a Delaware corporation                                 100%


SUBSIDIARIES OF FLORISTS' TRANSWORLD DELIVERY, INC.
---------------------------------------------------

FTD Holdings, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation                              100%

FTD of Canada Inc., a Canada corporation                                        100%

FTD.COM INC., a Delaware corporation                                             83%


SUBSIDIARIES OF FTD HOLDINGS, INCORPORATED
------------------------------------------

Renaissance Greeting Cards, Inc., a Maine corporation                           100%


SUBSIDIARIES OF FTD INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
-----------------------------------------------

Florists Transworld Delivery de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.                      100%
</Table>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 20010 presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Holdings, Inc.    By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Executive Officer,
and DirectorDate:August 3, 2010By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Financial OfficerDate:August 3, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25461]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel in Earth Sciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Proposal Review Panel in Earth Sciences (1569).
    Date and Time: October 15-17, 1997; 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230, Room 770.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Leonard E. Johnson, Program Director, 
Continental Dynamics Program, Division of Earth Sciences, Room 785, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230; 
Telephone: (703) 306-1559
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate Continental Dynamics proposals as 
part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 22, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-25461 Filed 9-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### Jessie Lee ALLEN, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYERS SERVICE CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. 40890.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 21, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 1, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 243 So.2d 454.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.