alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 188 (Monday, September 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25703]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center; Notice of Meeting of the 
Board of Governors of the Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the Board of Governors of the Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, 
October 22, 1997. The Board of Governors will meet at the National 
Institutes of Health, Clinical Center (Building 10), Medical Board Room 
(2C116), 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, Maryland, from 9:00 a.m. until 
approximately 2:00 p.m.
    The meeting will be open to the public form 9:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. 
and will include review of the minutes of the July 10 meeting, the 
Clinical Center Advisory Council, Report of the Medical Executive 
Committee, and closure of the FY 97 budget.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in sec. 552b(c)(6) of 
Title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the meeting may be 
closed to the public from approximately 12:30 p.m. to adjournment for 
discussion of personnel qualifications and salaries, the disclosure of 
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.
    Attendance by the public will be limited to space available.
    For further information, contact Ms. Maggi Stakem, Office of the 
Director, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, Building 10, Room 
2C146, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, (301) 496-4114.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact Ms. Stakem in advance of the meeting.

    Dated: September 22, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-25703 Filed 9-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
P.1 

OAR Box 1852 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

36) ll-C-12 

Docket Number: 

A-86-03 

Printed 11/19/2008 2:38:54 PM Sheet 36 of 101 
P.2 

Mr. John D. Winters 

Vice President 

Caterpillar, Inc* 

1000 N.E. Adams 

Peoria, II 61629 

Dear Mr. Wintersi 

Thank you for supplying additional information on the 

effect of diesel fuel sulfur on particulate emissions from your 

engines. We look forward to meeting with you in Ann Arbor in 

the near future to iiscuss future Caterpillar technology. 

We appreciate your transmittal of the Chevron and Radian 

papers. We were aware of them and, in fact, our own study is 

aimed at resolving some significant uncertainties which 

perceive to be present in each of them. One omission of 

of these estimates of the cost effectiveness of 

sulfur control is that they do not take into 

"credit" associated with reducing or eliminating the use of 

exhaust aftertreatment controls. Thia credit is estimated as 

the difference in compliance cost (with either the 1991 or 1994 

standards) between current and low sulfur fuels. In order to 

estimate this value, EPA must project the future compliance 

strategies engine manufacturers are contemplating both with and 

without low sulfur fuel. Any specific information you could 

provide in this area would be very helpful. 

Sincerely, 

BARCLAY FOR 

J. Craig Potter 

Assistant Administrator 

for Air and Radiation
#### Maude V. ROBERTS, Petitioner, v. Jack L. BURKETTE et al., Respondents.

No. 40985.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 12, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 245 So.2d 134.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### CHAIN OF LAKES GROVES, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. Juan R. CHAVEZ, Sr., et al., Respondents.

No. 40811.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 30, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
|   | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Oconee Financial Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 14, 2009 | /s/ B. Amrey HardenB. Amrey HardenChief Executive Officer         |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                                              |
| Dated: August 14, 2009 | /s/ Steven A. Rogers Steven A. RogersChief Financial Officer |
Case 06-02077-MBM Doc 31 Filed 05/08/06 Entered 05/10/06 12:21:58 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 8
Case 06-02077-MBM Doc 31 Filed 05/08/06 Entered 05/10/06 12:21:58 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 8
Case 06-02077-MBM Doc 31 Filed 05/08/06 Entered 05/10/06 12:21:58 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 8
Case 06-02077-MBM Doc 31 Filed 05/08/06 Entered 05/10/06 12:21:58 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 8
Case 06-02077-MBM Doc 31 Filed 05/08/06 Entered 05/10/06 12:21:58 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 8
Case 06-02077-MBM Doc 31 Filed 05/08/06 Entered 05/10/06 12:21:58 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 8
Case 06-02077-MBM Doc 31 Filed 05/08/06 Entered 05/10/06 12:21:58 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 8
Case 06-02077-MBM Doc 31 Filed 05/08/06 Entered 05/10/06 12:21:58 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 8
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GenTek Inc. (the
"Company") for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William E. Redmond,
Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Matthew M. Walsh, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
'SS' 1350, as adopted pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ William E. Redmond, Jr.
    ----------------------------
    William E. Redmond, Jr.
    Chief Executive Officer
    August 9, 2005


/s/ Matthew M. Walsh
    ----------------------------
    Matthew M. Walsh
    Chief Financial Officer
    August 9, 2005

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to 'SS' 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
'SS' 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to GenTek Inc. and will be retained by GenTek Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2457]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submitted for Office of 
Management and Budget Review; Comment Request

    The proposal for the collection of information listed below has 
been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for reapproval 
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 
35). Copies of the proposed information collection requirement and 
related forms and explanatory material may be obtained by contacting 
Dennis C. Jones at 303-231-3046. Comments and suggestions on the 
requirement should be made directly to the Bureau Clearance Officer at 
the telephone number listed below, and to the OMB Paperwork Reduction 
Project (1010-0095), Washington, DC 20503, telephone 202-395-7340.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before March 3, 1997.
    Title: Request to Exceed Regulatory Allowance Limitation.
    OMB Approval Number: 1010-0095.
    Abstract: The Minerals Management Service (MMS) Royalty Management 
Program (RMP) is proposing to continue collecting certain information 
from royalty payors on Federal or Indian mineral leases. Under certain 
circumstances lessees can deduct, from royalty payments, the reasonable 
actual costs of transporting the royalty portion of produced oil and 
gas from the lease to a processing or sales point not in the immediate 
lease area. When gas is processed for the recovery of gas plant 
products, lessees may claim a processing allowance. Transportation and 
processing allowances are a part of the product valuation process which 
MMS uses to determine if the lessee is reporting and paying the proper 
royalty amount.
    Bureau Form Numbers: MMS-4393.
    Frequency: As requested by lessee.
    Description of Respondents: Royalty payors on Federal and Indian 
mineral leases.
    Estimated Completion Time: .5 hours.
    Annual Responses: 75.
    Annual Burden Hours: 37.5 hours.
    Bureau Clearance Officer: Carol A. deWitt , (703) 787-1242.

    Dated: December 6, 1996.
 James W. Shaw,
Associate Director for Royalty Management.
[FR Doc. 97-2457 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
Case 1:04-cv-00279-MBC   Document 11   Filed 03/07/06   Page 1 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00279-MBC   Document 11   Filed 03/07/06   Page 2 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00279-MBC   Document 11   Filed 03/07/06   Page 3 of 4

Case 1:04-cv-00279-MBC   Document 11   Filed 03/07/06   Page 4 of 4
# E C 

# /

R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Dr., Suite 250  Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

Telephone: (919) 484

- 0222  Fax: (919) 484

- 0122 MEMORANDUM

TO: Project File

FROM: Jeff Harris, EC/R Inc.

DATE: January 4 , 2012

SUBJECT: ADDENDUM: Estimation of airflow for ferroalloys facility building ventilation

baghouses

__________________________________________________________________ ________

The Lat/Long Coor dinates for the buildings mentioned in the previous memo are as follows:

Felman :

B uildi ng containing EAF# 2,5, & 7

Latitude: 38.957739°

Longitude:

- 81.926257°

Eramet:

EAF #1

Latitude: 39.369621°

Longitude:

- 81.521385°

EAF #1 2

Latitude: 39.368836°

Longitude:

- 81.524747°

CCMA:

B uildi ng containing EAF #15 & 16

Latitude: 37.057256°

Longitude:

- 88.348616°

A .km z file containing these locations for use with Google Earth is attached.
#### Frank C. CUNEO, Appellant, v. Florence G. CUNEO, Appellee.

No. 69-6.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Dec. 8, 1969.

John D. Kruse, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Leonard Robbins of Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick & Burke, Hollywood, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Having heard oral argument, considered the briefs, and reviewed the record, we find there was ample evidence adduced to support the trial court’s decision to increase the alimony award in the present case. We reach this position on the ground that it is within the discretion of a trial judge to grant a petition for modification of alimony based upon unusual medical expenses which were not contemplated at the time of entry of the final divorce decree, but which arise thereafter. Clutter v. Clutter, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 544.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT L. MUSSER, : Civil Action No. 4:14-CV-0371

:

Plaintiff, : (Judge Brann)

:

v. :

:

CONAGRA FOODS, INC., :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, THEREFORE, THIS 15th DAY OF April, 2015, in

accordance with the memorandum issued this date IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

THAT:

1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. October 10,

2014, ECF No. 20. 

2. Final Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the case file. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

1

Case 4:14-cv-00371-MWB Document 36 Filed 04/15/15 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

MICHAEL KNAPP, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 No. 4:22-CV-01269 

 (Chief Judge Brann) 

ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of December 2022, in accordance with the 

accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 9) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is 

GRANTED. 

2. The complaint is DEEMED filed. 

3. Plaintiff shall pay the full filing fee of $350.00, based on the financial 

information provided in the application to proceed in forma pauperis

and the Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. The full filing fee 

shall be paid regardless of the outcome of the litigation. 

4. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2), the Superintendent, 

Warden, or other appropriate official at Plaintiff's place of 

confinement is directed to DEDUCT an initial partial filing fee of 

20% of the greater of: 

a. the average monthly deposits in the inmate’s prison account for 

the past six months, or 

b. the average monthly balance in the inmate’s prison account for 

the past six months. 

Case 4:22-cv-01269-MWB-MP Document 13 Filed 12/19/22 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

The initial partial filing fee shall be forwarded to the Clerk of the 

United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, 

P.O. Box 1148, Scranton, Pennsylvania, 18501-1148, to be credited to 

the above-captioned docket number. In each succeeding month, when 

the amount in Plaintiff’s inmate trust fund account exceeds $10.00, 

the Superintendent, Warden, or other appropriate official shall 

forward payments to the Clerk of Court equaling 20% of the 

preceding month’s income credited to Plaintiff’s inmate trust fund 

account until the fees are paid. Each payment shall reference the 

above-captioned docket number. 

5. The Clerk of Court is directed to FORWARD a copy of this Order to 

the Superintendent/Warden of the institution wherein Plaintiff is 

presently confined. 

6. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief 

may be granted with the exception of his Section 1983 supervisory 

liability claim against defendant Unit Manager Michael Knapp. 

7. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate defendant Superintendent 

Salamon. 

8. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3), the Clerk 

of Court is further directed to SERVE a copy of the Complaint (Doc. 

1), notice of lawsuit and request to waive service of summons (form 

AO 398), waiver of the service of summons (form AO 399) and this 

Order on defendant Michael Knapp. In the interest of efficient 

administrative judicial economy, the Court requests that Defendant 

waive service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d). 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

 Matthew W. Brann 

 Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:22-cv-01269-MWB-MP Document 13 Filed 12/19/22 Page 2 of 2
59

VIII. Order. 

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion (doc.

52) for judgment on the administrative record is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER 

ORDERED that the School District’s motion (doc. 49) for judgment on the 

administrative record and for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of 

Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendant.

S/Susan E. Schwab

Susan E. Schwab

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:12-cv-02290-SES Document 58 Filed 02/23/15 Page 1 of 1
#### Ernest C. BOURNE, a/k/a Ernest C. Bourne, Jr., and Bourne & Co., a Florida Corporation, a/k/a Bourne and Company, Appellants, v. BARNETT NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PETERSBURG, N. A., a National Banking Corporation, Appellee.

No. 77-80.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 11, 1978.

*446George N. Meros and John M. Edman of Meros, Coit, Wells, Edman & Meros, St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Joseph W. Gaynor of Jacobs, Robbins & Gaynor, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

HOBSON, Judge.

We have had this case under consideration for an unusual amount of time because we felt that there was a very close question as to whether or not there was a genuine issue of fact with respect to the appellants’ affirmative defense of novation. The trial court in this cause entered partial summary judgment on two counts of a three-count complaint filed by the appellee. In the same partial summary judgment it disposed of the appellants’ counterclaim and affirmative defenses.

On July 26, 1978, this court rendered its decision in *Pena v. Tampa Federal Savings and Loan Association, et al.,*Case No. 77-1427, wherein it wa# held that the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, unlike the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, do not permit entry of a final summary judgment until the entire case is resolved.

In this case the third count of the complaint is still pending and, therefore, no final judgment has been entered. Under *Pena, supra,*when the entire case has been finally determined, the partial summary judgment herein sought to be reviewed shall be considered as interlocutory and will be subject to review upon any appeal from the final judgment. Under these circumstances we, therefore, find it necessary to reverse on the authority of *Pena.*

GRIMES, C. J., and SCHEB, J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50290-50291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25441]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
    Title: Public Telecommunications Facilities Program (PTFP) 
Application Form.
    Agency Form Number: Not applicable.
    OMB Approval Number: 0660-0003.
    Type of Request: Revision of currently approved collection.
    Burden: 40,250 hours.
    Ave. Hours Per Response: Approximately 89 hours.
    Number of Respondents: Approximately 450.
    Needs and Uses: The Public Broadcasting Act authorizes grants to be 
awarded for the planning and construction of public telecommunications 
facilities. Members of the public telecommunications community must 
complete a standardized form to provide information for evaluation by 
PTFP through a competitive review process.
    Affected Public: State and local governments and non-profit 
institutions.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain a benefit.
    OMB Desk Officer: Tim Fain, (202) 395-3561.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th St. and 
Constitution Ave, N.W., Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Tim Fain, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.


[[Page 50291]]


    Dated: September 19, 1997.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer, Office of Management and 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 97-25441 Filed 9-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-60-P
<Page>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.2


                              NOTATION OF GUARANTEE

                  For value received, each Guarantor (which term includes any
successor Person under the Indenture) has, jointly and severally,
unconditionally guaranteed, to the extent set forth in the Indenture and subject
to the provisions in the Indenture dated as of December 19, 2001 (the
"INDENTURE") among Wheeling Island Gaming, Inc., the other Guarantors (as
defined in the Indenture) and U.S. Bank, N.A., as trustee (the "TRUSTEE") (a)
the due and punctual payment of the principal of, the premium (if any) on, and
the interest on, the Notes (as defined in the Indenture), whether at maturity,
by acceleration, redemption or otherwise, the due and punctual payment of
interest on overdue principal and premium and, to the extent permitted by law,
interest, and the due and punctual performance of all other obligations of the
Company to the Holders or the Trustee all in accordance with the terms of the
Indenture; and (b) in case of any extension of time of payment or renewal of any
Notes or any of such other obligations, that the same will be promptly paid in
full when due or performed in accordance with the terms of the extension or
renewal, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise. The
obligations of the Guarantors to the Holders of Notes and to the Trustee
pursuant to the Subsidiary Guarantee and the Indenture are expressly set forth
in Article Ten of the Indenture and reference is hereby made to the Indenture
for the precise terms of the Subsidiary Guarantee. Each Holder of a Note, by
accepting the same, agrees to and shall be bound by such provisions.

                                      WDRA FOOD SERVICE, INC.


                                      By:
                                          -------------------------------
                                           Name:  Scott L. Cooper
                                           Title: President