alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             624
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,659
<ALLOWANCES>                                       137
<INVENTORY>                                     13,513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,994
<PP&E>                                          15,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,494
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,137
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,500
<COMMON>                                        90,450
<OTHER-SE>                                     (95,333)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,495
<SALES>                                         50,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,858
<CGS>                                           46,817
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,817
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,893
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (70)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (38,201)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (38,201)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (38,201)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.90)
        

</TABLE>
#### Lovie C. DODD v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49923.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 5, 1977.

Crawley & Ford, Michael H. Steele, Kosciusko, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Scherry J. LeSieur, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before INZER, P. J., and ROBERTSON and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40628

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CESAR ANIBAL MORAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-00-CR-337-1

July 1, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Cesar Anibal Moran appeals his convictions for two counts of

possession with the intent to distribute more than 500 grams of

cocaine. Specifically, Moran contends that the government failed

to prove as to both Counts One and Two that he knew the vehicles in

both offenses were loaded with cocaine. He also asserts that his

conviction for the Mississippi offense (Count Two) should be1 U nited States v. Carreon-Palacio

, 267 F.3d 381, 389 (5th

Cir. 2001).

2 See United States v. Ramos-Garcia , 184 F.3d 463, 466 (5th

Cir. 1999); Unite d States v. Diaz-Carreon , 915 F.2d 951, 954-55

(5th Cir. 1990); United States v. Del Aguila-Reyes , 722 F.2d 155,

157-58 (5th Cir. 1983).

3 See United States v. Benbrook , 40 F.3d 88, 93-94 (5th Cir.

1994).

2 vacated since the contraband in that case was never analyzed by the

state crime laboratory.

To prove possession of a controlled substance, here cocaine,

with intent to distribute, the government must show beyond a

reasonable doubt (1) knowing (2) possession of cocaine (3) with

intent to distribute. 1 We have reviewed the record and the briefs

submitted by the parties and conclude that the evidence presented

at trial was sufficient to support the knowing element for both

convictions, based on, inter alia

, the implausible story offered by

Moran that he twice unwittingly purchased vehicle s loaded with

c ocaine hidden in each vehicle’s battery and the quantity and

street value of the seized cocaine. 2 Additionally, t here was

sufficient evidence, particularly the testimony of Captain Victor

Smith based on his field test, to support the jury’s determination

that the substance Moran was charged with possessing wi th the

intent to distribute under Count Two of the superseding indictment

was cocaine, despite the absence of an official laboratory report. 3

AFFIRMED.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2796 

To provide for the equitable settlement of certain Indian land disputes 

regarding land in Illinois, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. MULLIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for the equitable settlement of certain Indian 

land disputes regarding land in Illinois, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS. 

4 (a) JURISDICTION CONFERRED ON THE UNITED

5 STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

7 provision of law, the United States Court of Federal 

8 Claims shall have jurisdiction to hear, determine, 

9 and render judgment on a land claim of the Miami 

10 Tribe of Oklahoma under its Treaty with the United 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2796 IS

1 States of America signed at Grouseland August 21, 

2 1805 (7 Stat. 91) (commonly known as the ‘‘Treaty 

3 of Grouseland’’), without regard to the statute of 

4 limitations, including section 2501 of title 28, 

5 United States Code, and any delay-based defense, no 

6 matter how characterized. 

7 (2) JURISDICTION EXPIRATION.—Not later 

8 than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, 

9 the jurisdiction conferred to the United States Court 

10 of Federal Claims under paragraph (1) shall expire 

11 unless the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma files a land 

12 claim under that paragraph. 

13 (b) EXTINGUISHMENT OF TITLE AND CLAIMS.—Ex14 cept for a claim filed under subsection (a)(1), all other 

15 claims, including any and all future claims, of the Miami 

16 Tribe of Oklahoma, or any member, descendant, or prede17 cessor in interest to the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma, to land 

18 in the State of Illinois are extinguished. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### Woodrow L. ALLEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-2344.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 10, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 31, 1978.

Woodrow L. Allen, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Basil S. Diamond, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

We have for review an order of the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County summarily denying Appellant’s motion to vacate filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P.

Rule 3.850 requires that a trial court grant an evidentiary hearing to consider issues raised by a motion filed under the rule unless the motion and the files and records in the case *conclusively*show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief. *Saunders v. State,*340 So.2d 940 (4 DCA 1976).

Appellant alleged in his motion that the trial court failed to grant him credit for all time served between the time he was charged and sentencing, a period of approximately two years according to the allegations of the motion. These allegations, if true, would entitle Appellant to post-conviction relief. *Lawrence v. State,*306 So.2d 561 (4 DCA 1975); *Miller v. State,*297 So.2d 36 (1 DCA 1974).

In denying Appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion, the trial court determined that Appellant was properly credited for time served prior to sentencing, a period of one year. However, we are unable to determine from the record on appeal the basis for the trial court’s finding that Appellant served only one year. Without a complete record, we cannot find that Appellant’s motion and the files and records of the case *conclusively*show that Appellant is entitled to no relief. See *Saunders v. State,*supra, and *Hicks v. State,*165 So.2d 204 (2 DCA 1964); and *Wright v. State,*355 So.2d 870 (Fla. 2 DCA 1978).

REVERSED and REMANDED for an ev-identiary hearing on Appellant’s Rule 3.850 motion.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and MOORE, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W.
Andre, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 12, 2009



                                            By: /s/ PAUL W. ANDRE
                                                ___________________________
                                                    Paul W. Andre
                                                    Treasurer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our reports dated January 18, 2002 (except for Note T, as to
which the date is February 20, 2002), accompanying the consolidated financial
statements incorporated by reference or included in the Annual Report of CET
Environmental Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001. We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the aforementioned reports.





GRANT THORNTON LLP

Denver, Colorado
April 9, 2002
ATTACHMENT V –

HUMAN EXPOSURE AND ENVIROMENTAL RELEASES

INDUSTIRAL SITES CONTROLLED BY THE SUBMITER

1. (d) Process Description2. Occupational Exposure

3. Environmental Releases
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24398]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Telecommunications and Information Administration


Performance Review Board; Membership

    The following individuals are eligible to service on the 
Performance Review Board in accordance with the National 
Telecommunications and Information Administration Senior Executive 
Service performance appraisal system:

Kathryn C. Brown
Ronald P. Hack
Shirl G. Kinney
Bernadette McGuire-Rivera
Richard D. Parlow
Neal B. Seitz
William F. Utlaut
Anthony J. Calza,
Acting Executive Secretary, National Telecommunications and Information 
Administration, Performance Review Board.
[FR Doc. 97-24398 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-BS-M
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Video Network Communications, Inc. on Form S-8 No. 333-95799 of our report
dated March 7, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
an explanatory paragraph that discloses the uncertainty about the Companys
ability to continue as a going concern and an emphasis of matter
paragraph concerning its dependence on its majority
investor), appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of Video Network Communications, Inc. for the year ended December
31, 2002.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
April 11, 2003
#### Naamon JONES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-223.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

April 22, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
### A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data

By: James R. AndersonErnest E. HardyJohn T. RoachRichard E. Witmer

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp964

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Documents:                                -  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
  - **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Donald M. HUBER and Mary Lou Huber, Appellants, v. Lelon WHISENANT, Appellee.

No. 77-1059.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 9, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 25, 1978.

Jack B. Nichols of Nichols & Tatich, Orlando, for appellants.

Robert T. Burger, Satellite Beach, and Lawrence V. Johnston of Meadows & Johnston, Cocoa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

CROSS, LETTS and MOORE, JJ., concur.
Case 15-22161-GLT Doc 77 Filed 06/30/16 Entered 06/30/16 16:03:09 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 13
Case 15-22161-GLT Doc 77 Filed 06/30/16 Entered 06/30/16 16:03:09 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 13
Case 15-22161-GLT Doc 77 Filed 06/30/16 Entered 06/30/16 16:03:09 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 13
Case 15-22161-GLT Doc 77 Filed 06/30/16 Entered 06/30/16 16:03:09 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 13
Case 15-22161-GLT Doc 77 Filed 06/30/16 Entered 06/30/16 16:03:09 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 13
Case 15-22161-GLT Doc 77 Filed 06/30/16 Entered 06/30/16 16:03:09 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 13
Case 15-22161-GLT Doc 77 Filed 06/30/16 Entered 06/30/16 16:03:09 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 13
Case 15-22161-GLT Doc 77 Filed 06/30/16 Entered 06/30/16 16:03:09 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 13
Case 15-22161-GLT Doc 77 Filed 06/30/16 Entered 06/30/16 16:03:09 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 13
Case 15-22161-GLT Doc 77 Filed 06/30/16 Entered 06/30/16 16:03:09 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 13
Case 15-22161-GLT Doc 77 Filed 06/30/16 Entered 06/30/16 16:03:09 Desc Main

Document Page 11 of 13
Case 15-22161-GLT Doc 77 Filed 06/30/16 Entered 06/30/16 16:03:09 Desc Main

Document Page 12 of 13
Case 15-22161-GLT Doc 77 Filed 06/30/16 Entered 06/30/16 16:03:09 Desc Main

Document Page 13 of 13
#### William FOXWORTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-130.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 17, 1970.

William Foxworth, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Bevels et al. v. State, 156 Fla. 159, 23 So.2d 156 (Fla.1945); Sardinia v. State, 168 So.2d 674 (Fla.1964), and House v. State, 199 So.2d 134 (Fla.App.1967).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the T REIT, Inc. (the
Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Anthony W. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                        
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1.     The Report fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                       
|
| | 2.     The information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
    the Company.



| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ ANTHONY W. THOMPSON

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | Anthony W. Thompson    
| | Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 14, 2003

37
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
Data Series 765
Coastal       Topography�Northeast Atlantic Coast, Post-Hurricane Sandy,       2012
Hilary F. Stockdon,1 Kara J. Doran,1       Kristin L. Sopkin,2 Kathryn E.L. Smith,1 and Xan       Fredericks2

1U.S.       Geological Survey; 2Cherokee Nation Technology Solutions, St. Petersburg, FL

This Data Series contains lidar-derived bare-earth (BE) topography, dune elevations, and       mean-high-water shoreline position datasets for most sandy beaches for       Fire Island, New York, and from Cape Henlopen, Delaware to Cape Lookout,       North Carolina. The data were acquired post-Hurricane Sandy, which made       landfall as an extratropical cyclone on October 29, 2012.

Click on the area of interest to view the corresponding links to the       data directories for each State. 

Click on the links below to access the shapefile directory of the tile       extents displayed above, as well as the individual State directories.

Shapefile       of Tile ExtentsNew       YorkDelawareMarylandVirginiaNorth       Carolina

The post-Hurricane Sandy lidar and feature data can also       be viewed and queried through a standard Web-browser via an interactive       map viewer (http://olga.er.usgs.gov/Sandy). For integration with       other geographic information system (GIS) data layers, Web map       services (WMS) can be accessed via       the interactive map. Please note that Adobe Flash Player (version       11.1 or higher) is required for viewing and can be downloaded here: http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/.

Suggested Citation: Stockdon, H.F., Doran, K.J., Sopkin, K.L., Smith,       K.E.L., and Fredericks, Xan, 2013, Coastal topography�Northeast Atlantic       coast, post-hurricane Sandy, 2012: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series       765.

Publications are available from USGS Information Services, Box       25286, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225-0046       (telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS; email: infoservices@usgs.gov).

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/765/pubs765/Page Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, May 23, 2013, 04:08:41 PM
<Page>

                           [THE STATE OF TEXAS SEAL]

                            State Securities Board

                         208 E. 10th Street, 6th Floor
                             Austin, Texas 78701
                             Phone (512) 305-8300
                             FAX (512) 306-8310
                           http://www.ssb.state.tx.us

                              January 17, 2002

Phillip A. Wylie
Snell, Brannian & Trent, P.C.
8150 North Central Expressway, Suite 1800
Dallas, Texas 75206

RE: CAP ROCK ENERGY CORPORATION AND
    CAP ROCK ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE

Dear Mr. Wylie:

The State Securities Board of Texas has completed its review of information
provided by Cap Rock Energy Corporation. Based on this information, the
Enforcement Division has determined not to take action in regard to either
Cap Rock Electric Cooperative or Cap Rock Energy Corporation.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact
me at (512) 305-8300.

                                       Very truly yours,

                                       DENISE VOIGT CRAWFORD
                                       Securities Commissioner

                                       /s/ Joseph Rotunda

                                       Joseph Rotunda
                                       Attorney
                                       Enforcement Division
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**WRITTEN
      STATEMENT**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with this Quarterly Report of China 3C Group and its subsidiaries
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      the undersigned, Zhenggang Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




November
                10, 2008
            /s/
                Zhenggang WangZhenggang
                WangChief
                Executive Officer and Chairman(Principal
                Executive Officer)