### 26751 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 88 / Monday, May 7, 2012 / Notices

5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.

6. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.

7. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified under **DATES**

.

8. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal Register citation. III. What information collection activity or ICR does this action apply to?

Affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this ICR are companies that export from the United States to foreign countries, or that engage in wholesale sales of, chemical substances or mixtures.

Title: Notification of Chemical Exports—TSCA Section 12(b).

ICR number: EPA ICR No. 0795.14. OMB control number: OMB Control No. 2070–0030.

ICR status: This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on March 31, 2013. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), after appearing in the Federal Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers for certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.

Abstract: Section 12(b)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires that any person who exports or intends to export to a foreign country a chemical substance or mixture that is regulated under TSCA sections 4, 5, 6, and/or 7 submit to EPA notification of such export or intent to export. Upon receipt of notification, EPA will advise the government of the importing country of the U.S. regulatory action with respect to that chemical substance or mixture. EPA uses the information obtained from the submitter via this collection to advise the government of the importing country. This information collection addresses the burden associated with industry reporting of export notifications.

Responses to the collection of information are mandatory (see 40 CFR part 707). Respondents may claim all or part of a notice confidential. EPA will disclose information that is covered by a claim of confidentiality only to the extent permitted by, and in accordance with, the procedures in TSCA section 14 and 40 CFR part 2.

Burden statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1.3 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

The ICR provides a detailed explanation of this estimate, which is only briefly summarized here:

Estimated total number of potential respondents: 240.

Frequency of response: On occasion. Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent: 12.9.

Estimated total annual burden hours: 4,025 hours.

Estimated total annual costs: $245,246. This includes an estimated burden cost of $245,246 and an estimated cost of $0 for capital investment or maintenance and operational costs. IV. Are there changes in the estimates from the last approval?

There is a decrease of 825 hours in the total estimated respondent burden compared with that identified in the ICR currently approved by OMB. This decrease reflects the net effect of a decrease in the estimated number of TSCA section 12(b) notices sent to EPA and a decrease in the number of firms sending notices, based on EPA’s recent experience with those submissions. This change is an adjustment. V. What is the next step in the process for this ICR?

EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. EPA will issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you have any questions about this ICR or the approval process, please contact the technical person listed under **FOR FURTHER**
**INFORMATION CONTACT**

. List of Subjects

Environmental protection, Chemicals, Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: April 25, 2012. James Jones, Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2012–10940 Filed 5–4–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9670–2; Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–ORD– 2007–0664]** 

**Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS); Announcement of 2012 Program** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency.

**ACTION :**  Announcement of 2012 Program; request for information.

**SUMMARY :**  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing the IRIS 2012 agenda and requesting scientific information on health effects that may result from exposure to the chemical substances on the agenda, including assessments that EPA is starting this year.

**DATES :**  While EPA is not expressly soliciting comments on this notice, the Agency will accept information related to the substances included herein. Please submit any information in accordance with the instructions provided below.

**ADDRESSES :**  Please submit relevant scientific information identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–ORD–2007– 0664, online at www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred method); by email to ord.docket@epa.gov; by mail to Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket (Mail Code: 2822T), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460– 0001; or by hand delivery or courier to EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the EPA Docket Center is 202–566–1744. Detailed instructions are


### 26752 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 88 / Monday, May 7, 2012 / Notices

provided below under How to Submit Information to the Docket.

Background: EPA’s IRIS Program is a human health assessment program that evaluates quantitative and qualitative risk information on effects that may result from exposure to chemical substances found in the environment. Through the IRIS Program, EPA provides high quality science-based human health assessments to support the Agency’s regulatory activities. The IRIS database contains information for more than 540 chemical substances that can be used to support the first twosteps (hazard identification and doseresponse evaluation) of the risk assessment process. When supported by available data, IRIS provides oral reference doses (RfDs) and inhalation reference concentrations (RfCs) for chronic noncancer health effects and cancer assessments. Combining IRIS toxicity values with specific exposure information, government and private entities use IRIS to help characterize public health risks of chemical substances in site-specific situations and thereby support risk management decisions designed to protect public health.

EPA’ s process for developing IRIS assessments consists of: (1) A comprehensive search of the current scientific literature, a data call-in, and development of a draft IRIS health assessment; (2) internal EPA-wide review; (3) science consultation on the draft assessment with other Federal agencies and White House offices; (4) independent expert peer review, public review and comment, and public listening session; (5) revision of the assessment to address peer review and public comments; (6) internal EPA-wide review and interagency science discussion of EPA’s disposition of peer review and public comments; and (7) clearance and posting of the final assessment on IRIS (www.epa.gov/iris).

The Iris Agenda: As part of the IRIS process, EPA solicited nominations of chemicals for IRIS assessment or reassessment from EPA Program Offices and Regions, other Federal agencies and White House offices, and the public (75 FR 63827). EPA announced six general criteria for selection of chemicals for assessment or reassessment: (1) Potential public health impact; (2) EPAstatutory, regulatory, or programspecific implementation needs; (3) availability of new scientific information or methodology that might significantly change the current IRIS information; (4) interest to other governmental agencies or the public; (5) availability of other scientific assessment documents that could serve as a basis for development of an IRIS assessment; and (6) other factors such as widespread exposure. The decision of when to start assessments of the selected high-priority chemical substances depends on available Agency resources. Availability of risk assessment guidance, guidelines, and science policy decisions may also have an impact on the timing of EPA’s decision to assess a chemical substance.

In developing the IRIS agenda for 2012, EPA conducted literature searches for the nominated chemicals and made a determination as to whether a particular chemical had sufficient information to develop at least one toxicity value. EPA offices were asked to indicate which chemicals with sufficient data were priorities for their offices. EPA then considered the other criteria as listed in the Federal Register Notice (75 FR 63827) and the capacity of the IRIS Program to begin draft development for each chemical under consideration.

EPA is soliciting public involvement in assessments on the IRIS agenda, including new assessments starting in 2012, 2013, and 2014. While EPA conducts a thorough literature search for each chemical substance, there may be unpublished studies or other primary technical sources that are not available through the open literature. EPA is soliciting scientific information from the public during the information gathering stage for the list of new assessments provided in this notice. Interested persons should provide scientific analyses, studies, and other pertinent scientific information. While EPA is primarily soliciting information on new assessments announced in this notice, the public may submit information on any chemical substance at any time.

This notice provides: (1) A list of assessments completed since the IRIS agenda was last published in October 2010 (75 FR 63827); (2) a list of IRIS assessments in progress; (3) a list of IRIS assessments that will start in 2012, 2013, and 2014; and (4) instructions to the public for submitting scientific information to EPA pertinent to the development of assessments. Assessments Completed

The following assessments have been completed since the last IRIS agenda was published in a Federal Register Notice on October 18, 2010 (75 FR 63827).

Chemical Cas No.

dichloromethane (methylene

chloride) ................................ 75–09–2 hexachloroethane ..................... 67–72–1 Chemical Cas No.

2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-pdioxin (noncancer) ................ 1746–01–6 tetrachloroethylene

(perchloroethylene) ............... 127–18–4 tetrahydrofuran ......................... 109–99–9 trichloroacetic acid .................... 76–03–9 trichloroethylene ....................... 79–01–6 urea ........................................... 57–13–6

Assessments in Progress

The following assessments are underway. The status and planned milestone dates for each assessment can be found on the IRIS Track system, accessible from the IRIS database home page (www.epa.gov/iris). IRIS assessments for all substances listed as in progress in 2012 will be provided on the IRIS Web site at www.epa.gov/iris as they are completed. This publicly available Web site is EPA’s primary location for IRIS documents. In addition, external peer review drafts of IRIS assessments are posted for public information and comment. These drafts will continue to be accessible via the IRIS and NCEA Web sites. Note that these drafts are intended for public information only, and do not represent the Agency’s final position.

All health endpoints, cancer and noncancer, due to chronic exposure are being assessed unless otherwise noted. For all endpoints assessed, both qualitative and quantitative assessments are being developed where information is available.

Chemical Cas No.

acetaldehyde 1 ........................ 75–07–0. acrylonitrile 1 ........................... 107–13–1. ammonia 1 .............................. 7664–41–7. arsenic, inorganic 1 ................. 7440–38–2. benzo(a)pyrene 1 .................... 50–32–8. beryllium 1 ............................... 7440–41–7. biphenyl 1 ................................ 92–52–4. n-butanol 1 .............................. 71–36–3. tert-butanol ............................. 75–65–0. butyl benzyl phthalate 1 .......... 85–68–7. cadmium 1 ............................... 7440–43–9. chloroethane .......................... 75–00–3. chloroform 1 ............................. 67–66–3. chromium VI 1 ......................... 18540–29–9. cobalt ...................................... 7440–48–4.
copper 1 .................................. 7440–50–8. cumulative assessment for 6

phthalates. various.

di-n-butyl phthalate 1 .............. 84–74–2. 1,2-dichlorobenzene 1 ............. 95–50–1. 1,3-dichlorobenzene 1 ............. 541–73–1. 1,4-dichlorobenzene 1 ............. 106–46–7. diethyl phthalate 1 ................... 84–66–2. di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate 1 ........ 103–23–1. di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 1 ..... 117–81–7. diisobutyl phthalate ................ 84–69–5. diisononyl phthalate ............... 58033–90–2. 1,4-dioxane (inhalation) 1 ....... 123–91–1. dipentyl phthalate ................... 131–18–0.


### 26753 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 88 / Monday, May 7, 2012 / Notices

Chemical Cas No.

ethyl tertiary butyl ether

(ETBE). 637–92–3.

ethylbenzene 1 ........................ 100–41–4. ethylene oxide (cancer) ......... 75–21–8. formaldehyde 1 ....................... 50–00–0. hexabromocyclododecane

(mixed stereoisomers). 3194–55–6, 25637–99– 5. hexachlorobutadiene 1 ............ 87–68–3.hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-triazine (RDX) 1

. 121–82–4.

Libby amphibole asbestos ..... 1332–21–4. methanol (cancer) .................. 167–56–1. methanol (noncancer) 1 .......... 167–56–1. methyl tert-butyl ether

(MTBE) 1

. 1634–04–4.

naphthalene 1 ......................... 91–20–3. nickel (soluble salts) 1 ............ various. halogenated platinum salts

and platinum compounds. various.

polychlorinated biphenyls

(PCBs) (noncancer) 1

. various.

polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) mixtures. various.

styrene 1 ................................. 100–42–5. 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-pdioxin (cancer). 1746–01–6.

1,2,3-trimethylbenzene ........... 526–73–8. 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene ........... 95–63–6. 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene ........... 108–67–8. uranium (natural) 1 .................. 7440–61–1. vanadium pentoxide 1 ............. 1314–62–1. vinyl acetate 1 ......................... 108–05–4.

1 Reassessment of chemical currently on IRIS.

The cancer and noncancer assessments for inorganic arsenic, treated as two separate assessments in previous agendas, will be combined and proceed through the IRIS review process as one assessment. Similarly, the oral and inhalation assessments for chromium VI will be combined and proceed through the IRIS process as one assessment. EPA will update both the noncancer and cancer beryllium assessments, rather than just the cancer

assessment.

In January 2010, the IRIS assessment for methanol was released for external peer review and public comment. In June 2010, EPA decided to put the IRIS cancer assessment for methanol on hold pending a review of an underlying study by the Ramazzini Institute (RI). This review was conducted by an independent Pathology Working Group (PWG), jointly sponsored by EPA and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), which was established to conduct a review of several RI studies including the methanol study. Based on differences of opinion between the RI and PWG scientists in diagnosing leukemias and lymphomas, EPA has decided not to rely on RI data on leukemias and lymphomas in IRIS assessments. This decision impacts the methanol cancer assessment. EPA will discontinue the peer review of the draft methanol cancer assessment and develop a new draft that does not rely on the RI study. A schedule for the development and review of the cancer assessment will be announced on IRIS track (www.epa.gov/ iris). The assessment of methanol’s noncancer health effects does not rely on data from the RI. Therefore, the assessment for the noncancer effects of methanol will continue through remaining steps as a separate
assessment.

EPA is adding 1,2,3-trimethylbenzene (TMB) to the IRIS agenda to complete the set of three TMB isomers. Two other isomers of TMB are already included on the IRIS agenda and undergoing review (1,2,4–TMB and 1,3,5–TMB). 1,2,3–TMB is often found in the environment with 1,2,4- and 1,3,5–TMB. Given this situation, and in response to comments received in the Agency Review and Interagency Science Consultation for 1,2,4- and 1,3,5–TMB, EPA is adding 1,2,3–TMB to the agenda and will conduct assessments of all three isomers at the same time. Because the 1,2,4- and 1,3,5–TMB assessments are already underway, EPA would appreciate notification of any additional literature as soon as possible so that this information can be included in the 1,2,3–TMB assessment prior to public comment and external peer review.

The ethanol assessment is on the IRIS agenda but has not been started. Taking into account the complexity of the ethanol dataset, EPA is considering various approaches to conducting the ethanol assessment. EPA will revisit the priority of the ethanol assessment in FY13. New Assessments for 2012 Agenda

EPA developed a list of priority chemicals for 2012 from two sources: (1) Chemicals nominated for IRIS assessment by EPA programs, other Federal agencies, and the public; and (2) chemicals already on the IRIS agenda but delayed because of resource limitations. For newly nominated chemicals, EPA first considered whether sufficient data are available to support development of one or more IRIS toxicity values. For chemicals with sufficient data, EPA considered statutory, regulatory, or programmatic need based on the stated priorities of EPA’s Program and Regional Offices; potential public health impact of the assessment; interest to other levels of government or the public; and whether a partially completed draft for delayed assessments or an assessment by another organization is available that could serve as a basis for developing an IRIS assessment.

The following chemicals have been selected for inclusion in the 2012 IRIS agenda. The projected start dates included in the table below indicate the U.S. fiscal year in which EPA will start or update literature searches for these chemicals.

EPA is requesting information from the public for consideration in the development of these assessments. Instructions on how to submit information are provided below under How to Submit Information to the Docket.

Chemical Cas No. Projected start

antimony 1,3 ................................................................................... 7440–36–0 ............................................................... FY13. carbonyl sulfide 1,3 ........................................................................ 463–58–1 ................................................................. FY12. chlorobenzene 2,3 .......................................................................... 108–90–7 ................................................................. FY13. decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) 2 ........................................... 541–02–6 ................................................................. FY13. octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) 2 .............................................. 556–67–2 ................................................................. FY13. 1,2-dichloroethane (ethylene dichloride) 1,3 .................................. 107–06–2 ................................................................. FY14. diisopropyl ether (DIPE) 1 ............................................................. 108–20–3 ................................................................. FY12. tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME)‘‘ 1 .................................................. 994–05–8 ................................................................. FY12. 4,4’-dimethyl-3-oxahexane (TAEE) 1 ............................................ 919–94–8 ................................................................. FY12. isopropanol 1 ................................................................................. 67–63–0 ................................................................... FY13. manganese 1,3 ............................................................................... 7439–9 ..................................................................... FY13. mercury, elemental 2,3 ................................................................... 7439–96–5 ............................................................... FY14. methyl mercury 2,3 ......................................................................... 22967–92–6 ............................................................. FY14. tungsten and related compounds 1 ............................................... 7440–33–7, various ................................................. FY14. vanadium, elemental and compounds 2 various ........................... .................................................................................. FY13

1 Chemical was previously on the IRIS agenda but assessment was delayed due to resource limitations.


### 26754 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 88 / Monday, May 7, 2012 / Notices

2 Chemical is a new addition to IRIS agenda.

3 Reassessment of chemical currently on IRIS.

By FY14, EPA will have started all of the chemicals that were previously on the IRIS agenda, but delayed because of resource limitations, except for the chemicals that are being withdrawn from the agenda as described below under Withdrawn Assessments and the ethanol assessment, described above under Assessments in Progress. Among the new additions to the IRIS agenda, chlorobenzene, mercury, methyl mercury, and vanadium were selected for assessment because they are priorities for multiple EPA Program Offices and Regions and all chemicals have the potential for high impact on public health. While only two EPA Offices indicated that the siloxanes are priorities, D4 and D5 were selected for IRIS assessment because they met other criteria including high potential for impact on public health and widespread exposure and because of the opportunity afforded to perform a cumulative assessment of emerging contaminants.

One of the highest priority substances nominated for assessment was lead. EPA will defer a decision on the development of an IRIS assessment for lead until the end of 2012. EPA anticipates publication of a final Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) for lead during the summer of 2012. The ISA offers a comprehensive summary of the health and ecological scientific evidence and also includes information on lead sources, ambient air concentrations, fate and transport, exposure, and toxicokinetics. A draft ISA is available at http://epa.gov/ncea/ isa/lead.htm. In addition, the National Toxicology Program (NTP) anticipates completion in 2012 of a draftMonograph on Health Effects of LowLevel Lead, which summarizes the health evidence in humans related to major effects with a focus on blood lead levels <10 ug/dL. A draft NTP report, available at http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/ 36639, has been reviewed by an NTP Peer Review Panel. Upon completion, these documents will be evaluated to determine if an IRIS assessment is needed.

In FY2013, before beginning draftdevelopment, EPA will conduct a stateof-the-science workshop on manganese. Similarly, in FY2014, EPA will conduct a state-of-the-science workshop on elemental mercury and methyl mercury. These meetings will be open to the public. Withdrawn Assessments The following chemicals are withdrawn from the IRIS agenda:

Chemical Cas No.

alkylates ........................ various. bisphenol A ................... 80–05–7. mirex ............................. 2385–85–5. refractory ceramic fibers not applicable.

The alkylates are a distillation fraction of petroleum and are present in gasoline. Common alkylates found in gasoline for which IRIS assessments have not been recently completed include n-heptane, methylcyclohexane, 2-methylbutane, 2-methylpentane, 3- methylpentane, n-octane, 2,3,3- trimethylpentane, 2,3,4- trimethylpentane, and 2,2,5- trimethylhexane. This class of chemicals is withdrawn from the IRIS agenda because there are multiple chemicals in the class, many with limited databases. If individual alkylates with sufficient data to support an IRIS assessment are nominated in the future, the IRIS Program will consider these nominations individually. Bisphenol A is withdrawn because EPA is awaiting further analysis and results from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the NIEHS prior to determining whether Agency action under the Toxic Substances Control Act is required for protection of human health. Refractory ceramic fibers and mirex are withdrawn because they are no longer priorities for EPA.

We continue to request the submission of any scientific information that you would like EPA to consider for any assessment on the IRIS agenda. Instructions for submitting information are provided below.

How to Submit Information to the Docket: Submit your information, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– ORD–2007–0664, by one of the following methods:

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the online instructions for submitting

comments.

• Email: ORD.Docket@epa.gov.

• Facsimile: 202–566–1753.

• Mail: Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket (Mail Code: 2822T), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460. The telephone number is 202–566–1752. If you provide comments by mail, please submit one unbound original with pages numbered consecutively, and three copies of the comments. For attachments, provide an index, number pages consecutively with the comments, and submit an unbound original and three copies.

• Hand Delivery: The OEI Docket is located in the EPA Headquarters Docket Center, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is 202–566–1744. Deliveries are only accepted during the docket’s normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. If you provide comments by hand delivery, please submit one unbound original with pages numbered consecutively, and three copies of the comments. For attachments, provide an index, number pages consecutively with the comments, and submit an unbound original and three copies.

It is EPA’s policy to include all comments it receives in the public docket without change and to make the comments available online at http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless comments include information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http:// www.regulations.gov or email. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means that EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comments. If you send email comments directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comments that are placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit electronic comments, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comments and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comments due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comments. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters and any form of encryption and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information


### 26755 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 88 / Monday, May 7, 2012 / Notices

about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http:// www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.

All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically at http:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the OEI Docket in the EPA Headquarters Docket Center.

Additional Information: For information on the docket or www.regulations.gov, please contact the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket (Mail Code: 2822T), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone: 202–566–1752; facsimile: 202–566–1753; or email: ORD.Docket@epa.gov.

For information on the IRIS program, contact Karen Hammerstrom, IRIS Program Deputy Director, National Center for Environmental Assessment, (Mail Code: 8601P), Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone: 703–347–8642; or email: FRN Questions@epa.gov.

For general questions about access to IRIS, or the content of IRIS, please call the IRIS Hotline at 202–566–1676 or send electronic mail inquiries to hotline.iris@epa.gov.

Dated: April 30, 2012. Darrell A. Winner, Acting Director, National Center for Environmental Assessment.

[FR Doc. 2012–10935 Filed 5–4–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9669–6]**

**Underground Injection Control Program; Hazardous Waste Injection**  **Restrictions; Petition for Exemption— Class I Hazardous Waste Injection;**  **Diamond Shamrock Refining Company, LP, Sunray, TX** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of a final decision on a no migration petition reissuance.

**SUMMARY :**  Notice is hereby given that a reissuance of an exemption to the land disposal Restrictions, under the 1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, has been granted to Diamond Shamrock for three Class I injection wells located at Sunray, Texas. The company has adequately demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Environmental Protection Agency by the petition reissuance application and supporting documentation that, to a reasonable degree of certainty, there will be no migration of hazardous constituents from the injection zone for as long as the waste remains hazardous. This final decision allows the continued underground injection by Diamond Shamrock, of the specific restricted hazardous wastes identified in this exemption, into Class I hazardous waste injection wells WDW–102, WDW–192, and WDW–332 at the Sunray, Texas facility until December 31, 2025, unless EPA moves to terminate this exemption. Additional conditions included in this final decision may be reviewed by contacting the Region 6 Ground Water/ UIC Section. A public notice was issued February 27, 2012. The public comment period closed on April 12, 2012. No comments were received. This decision constitutes final Agency action and there is no Administrative appeal. This decision may be reviewed/appealed in compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act.

**DATES :**  This action was effective as of April 18, 2012.

**ADDRESSES :**  Copies of the petition and all pertinent information relating thereto are on file at the following location: Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Water Quality Protection Division, Source Water Protection Branch (6WQ–S), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Philip Dellinger, Chief Ground Water/ UIC Section, EPA—Region 6, telephone (214) 665–8324.

Dated: April 26, 2012. William K. Honker, Acting Director, Water Quality Protection
Division.

[FR Doc. 2012–10939 Filed 5–4–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE**  **UNITED STATES**

**[EXIM–OIG–2011–0010]**

**Office of Inspector General; Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records** 

**AGENCY :**  The Export-Import Bank of the United States, Office of Inspector General.

**ACTION :**  Notice of New Privacy Act System of Records.

**SUMMARY :**  In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (hereafter known as ‘‘Ex-Im Bank’’), Office of Inspector General (hereafter known as ‘‘OIG’’ or ‘‘Ex-Im Bank OIG’’) is giving notice of a new system of records entitled, ‘‘EIB-35-Office of Inspector General Investigative Records.’’ The information in the new system of records will be used by the Ex-Im Bank OIG to conduct criminal, civil, and administrative investigations, and will contain identifying information about potential subjects, sources, and other individuals related to these investigations.

**DATES :**  Effective Date: This system of records will become effective on June 15, 2012.

Comment Date: Comments should be received on or before June 6, 2012 to be assured of consideration.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by Docket Number EIB–2011– 0010 by one of the following methods:

1. Electronically through the eRulemaking Portal at http:// www.regulations.gov. Please search for EIB-–2011–0010.

2. By Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Alberto Rivera-Fournier, Ex-Im Bank, Office of Inspector General/811 Vermont Avenue NW., Rm. 976, Washington, DC 20571. Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received before the close of the comment period.

All comments received before the end of the comment period will be posted on http://www.regulations.gov for public viewing. Hard copies of comments may also be obtained by writing to Counsel to the Inspector General, Ex-Im Bank, Office of Inspector General/811 Vermont Avenue NW., Rm. 976, Washington, DC

20571.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Alberto Rivera-Fournier, Ex-Im Bank, Office of Inspector General, 811 Vermont Avenue NW, Rm. 976, Washington, DC 20571 or by telephone (202) 565–3908 or facsimile (202) 565–

3988.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Ex-Im Bank OIG is establishing a new system