alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132395 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132395 

 COA: 269309 

Oakland CC: 86-073450-FH 

ROBERT GLEN POTTS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 11, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0122 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 29, 2007 

 Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7438

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES EARL WALTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Fox, 

Senior District Judge. (2:07-cr-00017-F-1)

Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 28, 2017

Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Earl Walton, Appellant Pro Se. Eric David Goulian, Seth 

Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Earl Walton seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as unauthorized and 

successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims 

is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim 

of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-

85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Walton has not made the requisite showing. Additionally, we note 

that Walton’s career offender sentence would not be affected by

Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), because it was 

premised on two prior controlled substance convictions. See U.S. 

Sentencing Guidelines Manual §§ 4B1.1(a), 4B1.2(b) (2007). 
3

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### HAINES CITY ELECTRIC AND PLUMBING COMPANY, Incorporated, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Joyce B. WILSON, Administratrix, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 40717.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 20, 1971.

Petition dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SHAWN CHRISTIAN MURRAY, :

:

Petitioner :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-14-531

:

SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, : (Judge Brann)

:

Respondent :

ORDER

June 24, 2016

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1. Murray’s habeas corpus petition is DISMISSED. 

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

3. Based on the Court’s conclusion herein, there is no basis

for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

1

Case 4:14-cv-00531-MWB-JVW Document 50 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Theodore Li, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period
ended September 30, 2003 of Pacific Magtron International Corp.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

  a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

  b. evaluated the  effectiveness  of the registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

  c. disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have  disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation of internal  control
over financial reporting,  to the registrant's  auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent
function):

  a. all  significant  deficiencies  in the  design  or  operation  of  internal
controls  over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably  likely to adversely
affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,  summarize  and report
financial information; and

  b. any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 19, 2003

By: /s/ Theodore S. Li
    ------------------------------
    Theodore S. Li
    Chief Executive Officer/Chief
    Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GSI
Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael E. Katzenstein, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Michael E. KatzensteinMichael E. KatzensteinPrincipal Executive Officer


December 13, 2010

This Certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, or incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission by implication
or by any reference in any such filings to the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to GSI Group Inc. and will be retained by GSI Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25566]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ID-3063-000]


Alger B. Chapman; Notice of Filing

September 22, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 30, 1997, Alger B. Chapman filed an 
application for authorization under Section 305(b) of the Federal Power 
Act to hold the following positions:

Director: ISO New England Inc.
Vice Chairman: ABN AMRO Chicago Corporation
Chairman of the Board; Chief Executive Officer: ABN AMRO Investment 
Services Inc.

    Any person desiring to be heard or to protests said filings should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before October 3, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25566 Filed 9-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Peter SIMMONS, Jr. v. STATE.

No. 39068.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 278 

To require the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique 

ZIP Code for particular communities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2023 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 

Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the United States Postal Service to designate 

a single, unique ZIP Code for particular communities, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ZIP CODES. 

4 (a) SINGLE, UNIQUE ZIP CODE FOR PARTICULAR

5 COMMUNITIES.—Not later than 270 days after the date 

6 of enactment of this Act, the United States Postal Service 

7 shall designate a single, unique ZIP Code for, as nearly 

8 as practicable, each of the following communities: 

9 (1) Ocoee, Florida. 


pbinns on DSKBC47HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 278 IS

1 (2) Miami Lakes, Florida. 

2 (3) Oakland, Florida. 

3 (4) Village of Estero, Florida. 

4 (5) The Villages, Florida. 

5 (6) Hollywood, Florida. 

6 (b) MODIFICATION OF ZIP CODE BOUNDARIES.— 

7 Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of 

8 this Act, the United States Postal Service shall modify the 

9 boundaries of ZIP Codes 33971 and 33905 so that any 

10 area within ZIP Code 33971 as of the date of enactment 

11 of this Act that is within the city of Fort Myers, Florida 

12 is redesignated as being within ZIP Code 33905. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKBC47HB2PROD with BILLS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2003 

To make permanent the authorization for watershed restoration and 

enhancement agreements. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2005 

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To make permanent the authorization for watershed 

restoration and enhancement agreements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Watershed Restoration 

5 and Enhancement Agreements Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WATERSHED RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT 

7 AGREEMENTS. 

8 Section 323(a) of the Department of the Interior and 

9 Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 (16 U.S.C. 

10 1011 note; Public Law 105–277), is amended by striking 
2 

•S 2003 IS

1 ‘‘each of fiscal years 2006 through 2011’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘fiscal year 2006 and each fiscal year thereafter’’. 

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WILLIAM CORDOVA, : Civil No. 3:22-CV-816

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

: (Magistrate Judge Carlson)

MERRICK GARLAND, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW this 2nd day of January 2025, in accordance with the 

accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the defendants’ motion to dismiss, or in the 

alternative for summary judgment, (Doc. 58), IS GRANTED, the plaintiff’s 

complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice, and the clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE 

this file. 

S/ Martin C. Carlson 

Martin C. Carlson

 United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:22-cv-00816-MCC Document 66 Filed 01/02/25 Page 1 of 1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-17-00416-CR

Travis Addison CONSEVAGE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR0309W

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

SIGNED November 1, 2017.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Georgia-Pacific Corporation tel 918683 7671 

4901 Chandler Rood faz 9186813031 

MlIslog... OX 74~03-~909 

VIA EMAIL 

March 30, 2007 

Phillip Fielder 

Department of Enviromnental Quality 

Air Quality Division 

707 N. Robinson 

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102 

Re: BART SubmittallMinor Permit Modification Fee - Permit No. 99-113-TV (M-5) 

Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP, Muskogee Mill 

Dear Phillip, 

As discussed earlier, you wiU soon receive our BART submittal which will include a minor permit modification 

application. The submittal of the application requires a permit fee of$500 as welL It is our desire to pay this fee 

with a company credit card that will aUow us to call in the payment. The permit modification number given to us is 

99-ll3-TV (M-5). Upon payment ofthe application fee, we request a receipt of payment for our records_ 

Thank you for your efforts in allowing us to pay the fee in this manner. If you have further needs, please call me at 

(918)1684-4859 or Dustin Givens at 918-684-4865_ 

Sincerely, 

\
### Determination of uranium in natural waters

By: Franklin Butt BarkerJ. O. JohnsonK.W. EdwardsB.P. Robinson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1696C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Superseded Publications:
                                        The adsorption of radioactive substances on waterborne and consolidated materials(1957)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### Available water supply of the Las Vegas ground-water basin, Nevada

By: Glenn T. Malmberg

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1780

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 12**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 13**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Joe (Joseph) GUIDRY v. LOUISA SUGAR COOPERATIVE, INC., et al.

No. 11586.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Nov. 21, 1977.

*461Harold L. Savoie, Lafayette, for appellant.

M. J. McNulty, Jr., Bauer, Darnall, McNulty & Boudreaux, Franklin, for appel-lees.

Before LANDRY, SARTAIN and ELLIS, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge:

This is a suit by Joe (Joseph) Guidry for damages for personal injuries and property damage suffered when his tractor-trailer rig overturned. Defendants are Louisa Sugar Cooperative, Inc. and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, its insurer. After trial on the merits, judgment was rendered dismissing plaintiff’s suit, and he has appealed.

According to the testimony of plaintiff and his witnesses, the accident happened because plaintiff was told to drive his truck around to re-enter the unloading area while it was partly unloaded and badly out of balance. As he drove off the concrete slab at the unloading area, they testified that one of his wheels went into a hole, causing the truck to turn over.

Defendants’ witnesses testified that plaintiff was not told to drive around, but only to pull up a few feet; that he drove off on his own initiative; and that the truck turned over while on a black top public highway adjacent to the unloading area and entirely off the defendants’ property.

The trial judge accepted the testimony of defendants’ witnesses as more believable and reasonable, and found no negligence on the part of Louisa Sugar Cooperative or its employees. He found that the accident happened because plaintiff drove an unstable tractor-trailer rig without proper caution.

This appeal presents only questions of fact. After reviewing the evidence, we find the conclusions of the trial judge to be fully supported by the record.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed, at plaintiff’s cost.

AFFIRMED.
- 1 -

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, : No. 4:13-cv-00783

LLC, :

Plaintiff, : (Judge Brann)

:

v. :

:

101 ACRES AND 41,342 SQ. FT. : 

MORE OR LESS IN HEIDELBERG :

TOWNSHIP, YORK COUNTY, :

PENNSYLVANIA, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙  ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙ ∙

COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, : No. 4:13-cv-00785

LLC, :

Plaintiff, : (Judge Brann)

:

v. :

:

1.5561 ACRES MORE OR LESS IN : 

HEIDELBERG TOWNSHIP, YORK :

COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

ORDER

October 26, 2016

Case 4:13-cv-00783-MWB Document 146 Filed 10/26/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

AND NOW, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony Based on False 

Extraordinary Assumptions, ECF No. 119, is DENIED.

2. Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Testimony and Evidence of 

Plaintiff’s Expert Witness, ECF No. 115, is DENIED.

3. Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Plaintiff’s Witnesses, ECF No. 117, is 

DENIED.

4. Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Improper Lay Opinion and Other 

Testimony by Defendants, ECF No. 121, is GRANTED IN PART 

AND DENIED IN PART.

5. Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Testimony relating to Fear of Pipelines, 

ECF No. 113, is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

6. At the request of the parties, the Court has decided the following 

two issues as a matter of law and will instruct the jury accordingly:

(a) The date of the taking was December 9, 2014.

(b) The rights taken included the “Right-of-Way” documents 

appended to the Complaints in Condemnation. 

BY THE COURT:

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann 

United States District Judge

Case 4:13-cv-00783-MWB Document 146 Filed 10/26/16 Page 2 of 2
#### Norman L. BRITTEN, Sherman L. Britten, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 70-216 and 70-217.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 20, 1971.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Taylor v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 171 So.2d 402.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ„ concur.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARK K. BAKER, and : Civil Action No. 4:14-CV-2295

TERRY LYNN BAKER, :

:

:

Plaintiffs, : (Judge Brann)

:

v. :

:

STATE FARM MUTUAL :

AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., :

:

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

June 11, 2015

AND NOW, in accordance with the Memorandum of this same date, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8) is 

DENIED.

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge 

Case 4:14-cv-02295-MWB Document 12 Filed 06/11/15 Page 1 of 1