alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered October 19, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00498-CR

BRADRICK JERMAINE COLLINS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA17-18552-F

ORDER

By order entered October 5, 2018, the Court ordered the Dallas County Clerk to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing various documents appellant alleges are omitted from the 

clerk’s record. The Court inadvertently did not include a date for compliance with the Court’s 

order. By letter filed October 16, 2018, appellant points out the county clerk has not yet filed the 

supplemental clerk’s record, and he requests the Court to issue “an appropriate Order directing 

the trial court to file the records within a date suitable to this Court.”

We ORDER the Dallas County Clerk to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, 

a supplemental clerk’s record containing (1) any exhibits in the county clerk’s possession filed 

with appellant’s April 12, 2018 brief in support of his motion to arrest judgment; (2) any exhibits 

in the county clerk’s possession filed with appellant’s February 22, 2018 motion to suppress 
–2–

medical records; (3) appellant’s February 20, 2018 corrected motion to suppress evidence 

including any exhibits; and (4) in the event the county clerk does not have possession of one or 

more of the items requested, a letter verifying the exhibits or documents are not on file with the 

Dallas County Clerk. Because appellant has been found not indigent, the county clerk shall not 

be required to file the supplemental clerk’s record until appellant has paid the clerk’s fee for 

preparation of the supplemental clerk’s record or has made satisfactory arrangements to pay the 

fee. In the event appellant fails to pay or make satisfactory arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee, 

the county clerk is ORDERED to file with the Court, within TEN DAYS of the date of this 

order, a letter stating appellant has failed to pay the fee or make satisfactory payment 

arrangements.

By order entered October 3, 2018, the Court ordered appellant to provide the Court, 

within ten days of the date of the order, with written verification showing appellant had paid or

arranged to pay the court reporter for the reporter’s record. The order cautioned appellant that if 

he did not file the written verification as directed, the case would be submitted without a 

reporter’s record. Appellant has not filed the written verification as ordered. Accordingly, we 

ORDER this appeal to be submitted in due course without a reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(c).

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transmit a copy of this order, by electronic 

transmission, to John F. Warren, Dallas County Clerk; to Lori Ordiway, Assistant District 

Attorney; and to Bradrick Jermaine Collins, pro se.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT A.1



The following is a list of all the subsidiaries of the Company:

Baan International B.V.
Baan Development B.V.
Baan Software B.V.
Baan Austria GmbH
Baan (Schweiz) AG
Baan Nederland B.V.
Baan Belgium N.V.
Baan France S.A.
Baan Nordic AB
Baan UK Ltd.
Baan Holding Central Europe GmbH
Baan South Africa (Proprietary) Limited
Baan U.S.A., Inc.
Baan Canada, Inc.
Baan Brasil Sistemas de Informatica Ltda.
Baan Argentina Ltda.
Baan Info Systems India Pvt. Ltd.
Baan Software India Pvt. Ltd.
Baan Japan Co., Ltd.
Baan (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
Baan Education Asia Pacific (M) Sdn Bhd.
Baan Singapore Pte. Ltd.
Baan Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd.
Baan Korea Co. Ltd.
Baan Australia Pty. Ltd.
Baan Iberica I.S., S.A.
Baan Italia S.r.l.
Baan China Limited
Antalys, Inc.
Matrix Holding B.V.
Beologic A/S
CAPS Logistics, Inc.
CODA Plc.
Compact 3000 Ltd.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                        779,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               779,367
<CGS>                                          426,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  426,851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               271,169
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,329
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                150,876
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,562
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            148,020
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   148,020
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of US Biodefense, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Chin, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   



|/s/ David ChinDavid ChinChief Executive OfficerAugust 26, 2006
|--------------------------------------------------------------

---
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42518

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

DIMAS ROBERT NARVAIZ ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 593

Filed: August 14, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Thomas F. Neville , District Judge.

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence and order relinquishing jurisdiction

, affirmed

.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Dimas Robert Narvaiz pled guilty to aggravated assault, I.C. § 18

- 915(a) , and entered an
Alford 1 plea to use of a firearm or deadly weapon, I.C. § 19

- 2520

. In exchange for his guilty
plea, an additional charge was dismissed. The district court sentenced Narvaiz to a unified term
of fifteen years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years

. However, t he district

court retain ed jurisdiction, and Narvaiz was sent to participate in the rider program.

1 See North Carolina v. Alford , 400 U.S. 25 (1970).2 After Narvaiz completed his rider, the district court relinquished jurisdiction and ordered
execution of Narvaiz’s sentence. During the rider review hearing, Narvaiz moved, p ursuant to
I.C.R. 35, for a reduction of his sentence. The district court denied the motion. Narvaiz appeals,
claiming that the district court abused its discretion by failing to reduce his sentence upon
relinquishment of jurisdiction.

A motion for red uction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In
presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of
new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2 007). In conducting our
review of the grant or denial of a Rule 35 motion, we consider the entire record and apply the
same criteria used for determining the reasonableness of the original sentence. State v. Forde

, 113 Idaho 21, 22, 740 P.2d 63, 64 (Ct. App. 1987 )

. The order of the district court denying Narvaiz’s Rule 35 motion for reduction of

sentence and the order relinquishing jurisdiction without modification are affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Parent
------

Kentucky First Bancorp, Inc.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            State or Other          Percentage
Subsidiaries (1)                     Jurisdiction of Incorporation   Ownership
----------------                     -----------------------------  -----------
<S>                                  <C>                            <C>
First Federal Savings Bank           United States                         100%
 
Cynthiana Service Corporation (2)    Kentucky                              100%
</TABLE>

-------------------------
(1)  The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in
     the consolidated financial statements contained in the financial statements
     attached hereto as an exhibit.
(2)  Wholly owned subsidiary of First Federal Savings Bank.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                CET SERVICES, INC.
                        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of CET Services, Inc. for the period ending December 31, 2007:

     (1)     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of CET
Services, Inc.






/s/ Steven H. Davis
Steven H. Davis
Chief Executive Officer
April 3, 2008



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to CET Services, Inc. and will
be retained by CET Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 

WILLIAM T. BOUZA, 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

WARDEN of FCI ALLENWOOD - 

MEDIUM, 

 Respondent. 

 No. 4:24-CV-00998 

 (Chief Judge Brann) 

 

ORDER

AND NOW, this 3rd day of December 2024, in accordance with the 

accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Petitioner William T. Bouza’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED. 

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

 Matthew W. Brann 

 Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:24-cv-00998-MWB-MP Document 16 Filed 12/03/24 Page 1 of 1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsImproved Aircraft Acoustic Technology and its Effect on Airport Community Noise ImpactNo abstract availableDocument ID20180004396Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsShepherd, Kevin P.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Marcolini, Michael A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Thompson, Terence R.*(The Climate Service, Inc. Ashville, NC, United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 10, 2018Publication DateJune 1, 2018Subject CategoryEnvironment PollutionReport/Patent NumberL-20934NASA/TM-2018-219840NF1676L-30364Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 432938.11.01.07.43.40.21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180004396.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material                respects the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|

|   |                                                                                    |                                  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                    |                                  |
|   |                                                                               | /s/                          Erna Gao |
|   |                                                                                         |
|   | Erna GaoChief Financial OfficerDate: November 14,                            2006  |

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4910-4911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2488]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

16 CFR Part 1507


Fireworks Devices; Fuse Burn Time; Final Rule

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Affirmation of final rule and announcement of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission announces that it has received no objections to 
its final rule amending its fireworks regulations under the Federal 
Hazardous Substances Act that was published on December 20, 1996. 61 FR 
67197. This final rule changes the allowable fuse burn times of 
fireworks devices (except firecrackers) from the previously required 
range of 3 to 6 seconds to the range of 3 to 9 seconds.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The rule becomes effective on February 3, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Poth, Office of Compliance, 
Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC 20207-0001; 
telephone (301) 504-0400, ext. 1375.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 20, 1996, the Commission

[[Page 4911]]

issued a final rule amending its fireworks regulations under the 
Federal Hazardous Substances Act. 61 FR 67197. This final rule changes 
the allowable fuse burn times of fireworks devices (except 
firecrackers) from the previously required range of 3 to 6 seconds to 
the range of 3 to 9 seconds. Increasing the range will improve safety 
by allowing manufacturers to more consistently produce fireworks that 
do not have dangerously short fuse burn times of below 3 seconds. 
Further, the increase in the maximum allowable fuse burn time to 9 
seconds will not create any additional risk of injury to consumers.
    The procedures established under section 701(e) of the Food, Drug, 
and Cosmetic Act (``FDCA'') apply to this rulemaking. 15 U.S.C. 
1261(q)(2). These procedures provide that, once the Commission issues a 
final rule, persons who would be adversely affected by the rule have 30 
days in which to file objections with the Commission stating the 
grounds therefor, and to request a public hearing on those objections. 
21 U.S.C. 371(e). Here, this 30-day period for objections expired on 
January 21, 1996.
    The Commission is required to publish a notice in the Federal 
Register specifying any parts of the regulation that have been stayed 
by the filing of proper objections or, if no objections have been 
filed, stating that fact. By this notice, the Commission states that no 
objections to the final rule were filed in this proceeding. 
Accordingly, the rule will go into effect on February 3, 1997, the date 
this notice is published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 28, 1997.
Sadye E. Dunn,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-2488 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on 
Form S-8 Nos. 33-92594, 33-92596, 33-92598, 33-92600, 33-92602, 33-92604, 
33-92606, 33-92610, 33-92612, 33-92614, 33-92616, 33-92618, 33-92620, 
33-92626, 33-92628, 33-92630, 33-92674, 33-93178, 333-19055, 333-22743, 
333-24179, 333-30075, and 333-37003 of U.S. Industries, Inc. of our report 
dated November 17, 1997 with respect to the consolidated/combined financial 
statements and schedule of U.S. Industries, Inc. included in its Annual 
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1997, filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


New York, New York
November 25, 1997
#### Lucian CHOQUETTE and Wanda Choquette, his wife; David A. Unversaw and Adeline R, Unversaw, his wife, Appellants, v. BROWARD COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT and Jess Yoho, Appellees.

No. 69-298.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

June 12, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stephen R. Booher, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2725 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2725

To authorize the establishment of the US-ASEAN Center to support United 
      States economic and cultural engagement with Southeast Asia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 5, 2023

 Mr. Van Hollen (for himself and Mr. Romney) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the establishment of the US-ASEAN Center to support United 
      States economic and cultural engagement with Southeast Asia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. US-ASEAN CENTER.

    (a) Defined Term.--In this Act, the term ``ASEAN'' means the 
Association of Southeast Asian Nations.
    (b) Establishment.--The Secretary of State is authorized to enter 
into a public-private partnership for the purposes of establishing a 
US-ASEAN Center in the United States to support United States economic 
and cultural engagement with Southeast Asia.
    (c) Functions.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the US-
ASEAN Center established pursuant to subsection (b) may--
            (1) provide grants for research to support and elevate the 
        importance of the US-ASEAN partnership;
            (2) facilitate activities to strengthen US-ASEAN trade and 
        investment;
            (3) expand economic and technological relationships between 
        ASEAN countries and the United States into new areas of 
        cooperation;
            (4) provide training to United States citizens and citizens 
        of ASEAN countries that improve people-to-people ties;
            (5) develop educational programs to increase awareness for 
        the United States and ASEAN countries on the importance of 
        relations between the United States and ASEAN countries; and
            (6) carry out other activities the Secretary of State 
        considers necessary to strengthen ties between the United 
        States and ASEAN countries and achieve the objectives of the 
        US-ASEAN Center.
                                 <all>
```