alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 1 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 2 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 3 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 4 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 5 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 6 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 7 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 8 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 9 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 10 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 11 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 12 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 13 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 14 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 15 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 16 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 17 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 18 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 19 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 20 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 21 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 22 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 23 of 24USCA11 Case: 22-11143 Document: 204-1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023 Page: 24 of 24
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION  Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350  As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certify that to our knowledge the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 of Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A. (the "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date:
March 27, 2009

|    |  |                                                                                                  |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ ZEINAL ABEDIN MAHOMMED BAVA Name:  Zeinal Abedin Mahommed Bava
Title:Chief Executive Officer |  | 

Date:
March 27, 2009

|    |  |                                                                                    |  | 
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ LUIS PACHECO DE MELO Name:  Luis Pacheco de Melo
Title:Chief Financial Officer |  | 

This
certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F and shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

---



QuickLinks
# Official Journal C 191/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 191 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6418 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 191

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6418 May 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2021/C 191/01 | Position (EU) No 18/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Cybersecurity Industrial, Technology and Research Competence Centre and the Network of National Coordination CentresAdopted by the Council on 20 April 2021 | 1 |
| 2021/C 191/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 18/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Cybersecurity Industrial, Technology and Research Competence Centre and the Network of National Coordination Centres | 32 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2021/C 191/01

Position (EU) No 18/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Cybersecurity Industrial, Technology and Research Competence Centre and the Network of National Coordination CentresAdopted by the Council on 20 April 2021

1

2021/C 191/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 18/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Cybersecurity Industrial, Technology and Research Competence Centre and the Network of National Coordination Centres

32

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### NIMNICHT d/b/a Riverside Chevrolet Co. v. OSTERTAG.

No. 38953.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 225 So.2d 459.
Exhibit 10(6)

                    Amendment dated November 15, 1995 to the

                    Promus Hotel Corporation ("the Company")

                    Savings and Retirement Plan ("the Plan")

Pursuant  to Section 11.1  of the  Plan, this  Amendment to  the Plan,  upon the
recommendation of  the Human Resources  Committee, has been adopted  on November
15, 1995 by an action of the Board  of Directors of the Company, effective as of
December  31,  1995 and  after  the spin-off  of  the  Company's Employee  Stock
Ownership Plan.


          1.   Section 3.3 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following
phrase to the end of such section: 

               ;  provided, however,  that no  Employee who  is employed  in the
               capacity  of  an   (1) Embassy  Suitekeeper,  (2)   Hampton  Room
               Attendant  or (3)  Homewood  Suitekeeper  shall  be  an  Eligible
               Employee;  and provided, further,  that any Employee  hired after
               December 31,  1995 shall not  be an Eligible Employee  until such
               Employee attains age 21.
 .
                                     * * * *


     I certify that  this amendment was adopted by  the Promus Hotel Corporation
Board  of Directors  upon recommendation  of  the Human  Resources Committee  on
November 15, 1995.


___________________________________
Ralph B. Lake, Secretary
Case 14-22724-GLT Doc 398 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 12:10:24 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 11
Case 14-22724-GLT Doc 398 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 12:10:24 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 11
Case 14-22724-GLT Doc 398 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 12:10:24 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 11
Case 14-22724-GLT Doc 398 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 12:10:24 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 11
Case 14-22724-GLT Doc 398 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 12:10:24 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 11
Case 14-22724-GLT Doc 398 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 12:10:24 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 11
Case 14-22724-GLT Doc 398 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 12:10:24 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 11
Case 14-22724-GLT Doc 398 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 12:10:24 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 11
Case 14-22724-GLT Doc 398 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 12:10:24 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 11
Case 14-22724-GLT Doc 398 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 12:10:24 Desc Main

Document Page 10 of 11
Case 14-22724-GLT Doc 398 Filed 04/21/16 Entered 04/21/16 12:10:24 Desc Main

Document Page 11 of 11
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50609]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25652]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5898-8]


Clean AIr Act Advisory Committee

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the 
Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC) on November 19, 1990 to 
provide independent advice and counsel to EPA on policy issues 
associated with implementation of the Clean Air Act of 1990. The 
Committee advises on economic, environmental, technical, scientific, 
and enforcement policy issues.

Open Meeting Notice

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. App. 2 Section 10(a)(2), notice is hereby 
given that the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee will hold its next open 
meeting on Friday November 7, 1997, from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. at 
Sheraton Grand Hotel, 4860 W. Kennedy Blvd., Tampa, Florida 33609. 
Seating will be available on a first come, first served basis. The 
Permits/NSR/Toxics Integration Subcommittee, the Economic Incentives 
and Regulatory Innovations Subcommittee, the Linking Transportation, 
Land Use and Air Quality Concerns Subcommittee will conduct meetings on 
Thursday November 6, 1997, from approximately 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. 
at the same hotel.

Inspection of Committee Documents

    The committee agenda and any documents prepared for the meeting 
will be publicly available at the meeting. Thereafter, these documents, 
together with CAAAC meeting minutes, will be available for contacting 
Committee DFO Paul Rasmussen at (202) 260-6877.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning this meeting of the CAAAC, 
please contact Paul Rasmussen, Officer of Air and Radiation, US EPA 
(202) 260-6877, Fax (202) 260-4185 or by mail at US EPA, Officer of Air 
and Radiation (Mail Code 6102), Washington, D.C. 20460. If you would 
like to receive an agenda for the CAAAC meeting, please leave your fax 
number on Mr. Rasmussen's voice mail and it will be forwarded to you.

    Dated: September 18, 1997.
Robert D. Brenner,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 97-25652 Filed 9-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              25
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,102
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,006
<INVENTORY>                                        267
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,670
<PP&E>                                           6,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,883
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,835
<BONDS>                                            251
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,589
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,540
<OTHER-SE>                                         988
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,202
<SALES>                                         66,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,497
<CGS>                                           65,201
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,858
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,668
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 892
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    722
<INCOME-TAX>                                       183
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                538
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       538
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
Case 4:10-cv-00271-MM-DB Document 4 Filed 02/09/10 Page 1 of 5
Case 4:10-cv-00271-MM-DB Document 4 Filed 02/09/10 Page 2 of 5
Case 4:10-cv-00271-MM-DB Document 4 Filed 02/09/10 Page 3 of 5
Case 4:10-cv-00271-MM-DB Document 4 Filed 02/09/10 Page 4 of 5
Case 4:10-cv-00271-MM-DB Document 4 Filed 02/09/10 Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT 14.1

                        THOMASVILLE BANCSHARES, INC.

               CODE OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS

      This Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers (this "Code") applies to
the Chief Executive Officer and all senior financial officers identified by the
Chief Executive Officer (the "senior financial officers").  The Company's senior
financial officers shall (absent a waiver from the audit committee of the
Company's board of directors, after full disclosure), to the best of their
knowledge and ability, adhere to and advocate the following principles and
responsibilities governing their professional and ethical conduct.  The failure
to adhere to this Code will result in the disciplinary action deemed appropriate
by appropriate supervisory personnel or by the Company's board of directors,
which may include termination of employment.

  1.  Senior financial officers shall act with honesty and integrity. Senior
financial officers shall avoid all actual or apparent conflicts of interest
between personal and professional relationships and shall disclose to the audit
committee of the board of directors any material transaction or relationship
that reasonably could be expected to give rise to such conflict.

  2.  Senior financial officers shall endeavor to provide information that is
full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable in all reports and documents
that the Company files with, or submits to, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC") and other public filings or communications made by the
Company.

  3.  Senior financial officers shall endeavor to faithfully comply with all
laws, rules and regulations of federal, state, and local governments, and all
applicable private or public regulatory agencies.

  4.  Senior financial officers shall act in good faith, responsibly, with due
care, competence, and diligence.  Senior financial officers shall not knowingly
or recklessly misrepresent material facts or allow their independent judgment
to be subordinated.

  5.  Senior financial officers shall respect the confidentiality of information
acquired in the course of their employment except when authorized or otherwise
legally obligated to disclose such information.  Senior financial officers shall
not use for personal advantage confidential information acquired in the course
of their employment.

  6.  Senior financial officers shall proactively promote ethical behavior among
peers and subordinates in the work place.

  7.  Senior financial officers shall act responsibly in their use of and
control over the Company's assets and resources.

  8.  Senior financial officers shall promptly report to the audit committee
any violation or suspected violation of this Code.

      Each senior financial officer is expected to adhere at all time to this
Code.  Only the audit committee of the board of directors shall have the
authority to approve any deviation or waiver from this Code.  Any waiver and
the reasons for it shall be promptly disclosed in a filing on Form 8-K with
the SEC or, subject to satisfaction of any conditions established by the SEC,
posted on the Company's website.
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2591]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 012797A]

Western Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council will hold a 
meeting of its Bottomfish Task Force.

DATES: The meeting will be held on 28 February 1997, from 9:00 am to 
5:00 pm.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Leiopapa A Kamehameha Bldg 
(State Office Tower), 235 South Beretania Street, Room 204, Honolulu, 
Hawaii 96813; telephone: (808) 522-8220.
    Council address: Western Pacific Fishery Management Council, 1164 
Bishop St., Suite 1405, Honolulu, HI, 96813.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kitty M. Simonds, Executive Director; 
telephone 808-522-8220.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The task force will hold it's fourth meeting 
to discuss and formulate limited entry alternatives for the Mau Zone 
bottomfish fishery in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands and consider 
other business as required.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Kitty M. Simonds, 808-522-8220 (voice) or 808-
522-8226 (fax), at least 5 days prior to meeting date.

    Dated: January 28, 1997.
Bruce Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-2591 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
```
#### CITRUS ENGINEERING, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. SIMS CRANE SERVICE, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 69-180.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 4, 1970.

W. H. Carmine, Jr., Lakeland, for appellant.

Raymond E. LaPorte, Tampa, for Sims Crane Service.

Thomas L. Clarke, Jr., Lakeland, for Suwannee Transfer, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff below, appeals a final judgment entered by the trial court sitting without a jury.

It is incumbent upon an appellant to show reversible error to overcome the presumption of correctness of the trial court’s final judgment. This the appellant has failed to do.

We have reviewed the record-on-appeal and carefully studied the briefs of the respective parties and find that the judgment appealed is supported by competent substantial evidence which accords with logic and reason and, therefore, the judgment appealed is

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
#### Larry Neal PAVOLINI v. Georgie Lee PAVOLINI.

No. 50512.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 16, 1978.

Earl B. Stegall, Gulfport, for appellant.

Patricia C. Champagne, Gulfport, for ap-pellee.

Before SMITH, P. J., and BROOM and LEE, JJ.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

PATTERSON, C. J., ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG, WALKER, BOWLING and COFER, JJ., concur.
#### Dan Currie GILBERT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. HH-490.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 24, 1978.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender; Margaret Good and Louis Carres, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his grand larceny conviction, claiming that a statement made by the prosecutor in his closing argument constituted an improper comment on his consti*406tutional right to remain silent. We agree and reverse.

The record reveals that the evidence against appellant was composed of (1) the testimony of a co-defendant who had turned State’s evidence, and (2) the testimony of a Pensacola police investigator who stated that inculpatory information against appellant had been given to him by third parties who did not testify at the trial. Appellant did not testify or present a defense. The prosecutor in his closing argument made the following statement:

> “I submit to you that the McDaniels [the third parties mentioned in the investigator’s testimony] have done that sufficiently [corroborated the co-defendant’s testimony] in placing Gilbert in Pensacola at the time. And if Gilbert wasn’t in Pensacola, then I submit you probably have some alibi witnesses to tell us exactly where he was, but we don’t have that, and so I submit — ”

Appellant’s counsel objected and moved for a mistrial. The court denied the motion and gave the jury the following cautionary instruction:

> “Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the state attorney made a comment as to the defendants being placed in Pensacola, and made the further comment that should he not have been in Pensacola he probably could have had an alibi or some witnesses to testify. The defendant is not required in any criminal case to testify himself, produce any evidence in his own behalf, so I will caution you to disregard the inadvertent comment that the state attorney made, and let him proceed on his argument.”

Subsequently, appellant was found guilty by the jury and his motion for a new trial was denied.

We believe that in the circumstances of this case the comment made by the prosecutor and the judge’s subsequent cautionary instruction called an improper amount of attention to the appellant’s lack of an alibi defense and thereby violated his right to remain silent. The prosecutor’s remark may well have tipped the scales against appellant by leaving the jury with the impression that appellant had the burden to come forward with a defense and prove his innocence. That error was particularly harmful here where the State’s case was comprised of the vague, contradictory testimony of the co-defendant and little else. We believe appellant should be afforded a new trial.

The judgment and sentence are reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

McCORD, C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Thomas W. Fry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





March 26,
2009


By
              /s/ Thomas W. FryThomas W. Fry, Chief Financial
  Officer