alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THOMASVILLE BANCSHARES, INC. FOR 
THE PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 1998 TO DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                YEAR
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-1-1998
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                3,145,678
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                      5,265,242
<TRADING-ASSETS>                      0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>           6,033,966
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                  0
<LOANS>                               69,738,040
<ALLOWANCE>                           868,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        87,609,812
<DEPOSITS>                            77,134,879
<SHORT-TERM>                          0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                   365,709
<LONG-TERM>                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                              1,380,000
<OTHER-SE>                            8,729,224
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>        87,609,812
<INTEREST-LOAN>                       6,003,022
<INTEREST-INVEST>                     245,506
<INTEREST-OTHER>                      136,981
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                      6,385,509
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                    2,950,679
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    2,966,794
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                 3,418,715
<LOAN-LOSSES>                         251,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                    0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                       2,071,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       1,584,162
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>            1,584,162
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                          902,562
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.69
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                        4.86
<LOANS-NON>                           0
<LOANS-PAST>                          0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                      104,826
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                       104,826
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                      644,913
<CHARGE-OFFS>                         32,817
<RECOVERIES>                          5,381
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                     868,477
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                  850,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                   0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>               18,477
        

</TABLE>
### Public and industrial water supplies of the western coal region, Kentucky

By: Bruce William Maxwell

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir339

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
- 1 -

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : No. 4:16-cr-00230-01

: 

v. : (Judge Brann)

:

SHAKEEN ASMAR TAYLOR, : 

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 18

th day of October, 2016, in accordance with 

the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant’s Motion for Review and Revocation of 

Detention Order, ECF No. 27, is DENIED.

2. The Order of Detention entered by United States 

Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle, III, ECF No. 22, is 

AFFIRMED and shall apply with full force and effect

pending trial.

Case 4:16-cr-00230-MWB Document 38 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

BY THE COURT:

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann 

United States District Judge

Case 4:16-cr-00230-MWB Document 38 Filed 10/18/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Dennis R. Casey, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report of Form 10-K of Remote Dynamics, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: December 14, 2005       /s/ Dennis R. Casey     Dennis R. Casey, President and Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)
Slip Op. 04-26

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

 

BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

___________________________________

:

SHINYEI CORPORATION OF AMERICA, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : Court No. 00-00130

:

UNITED STATES, et. al., :

:

Defendant. :

___________________________________:

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court pursuant to the decision of

the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) in Shinyei

Corp. of Am. v. United States, 355 F.3d 1297 (Fed. Cir. 2004), and

the CAFC mandate of March 12, 2004, reversing and remanding the

judgment of the Court in Shinyei Corp. of Am. v. United States, 27

CIT ___, ___, 248 F. Supp. 2d 1350.

The CAFC held that this Court erred in granting defendant’s

motion to dismiss the action pursuant to USCIT R. 12(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiff proceed with the merits of the case

consistent with the CAFC’s opinion.

 /s/ NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS 

 NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

 SENIOR JUDGE

Dated: March 22, 2004

New York, New York
# Subsistence supply chain employees grow beards to raise cancer awareness

/ Published Dec. 4, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 
As the leaves changed colors on nature’s trees, beards with shades of red, brown, white, gray, black and even a few multi-colored, appeared on the faces of nearly 20 men from the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Subsistence supply chain during “No Shave November.”

The voluntary national event held each November seeks to bring cancer awareness and encourage participants to donate the money typically used for shaving supplies to a local charity.

Rich Faso, deputy director, Subsistence supply chain said this was his first time participating and thought it would be a good team building exercise.

 “When I look in the mirror, I think of people with cancer,” Faso said. “The awareness that ‘No Shave November’ brings to cancer serves as a simple reminder of the struggles that people endure. Cancer is non-discriminatory and we all know someone who has been afflicted by cancer. This is for all the family, friends, co-workers and acquaintances who battle cancer or who have battled cancer.”

For John Sheehan, the Subsistence customer operations director and almost 20-year cancer survivor, this opportunity took on a personal meaning.

“Having both of my parents passed away from various forms of cancer and being diagnosed myself with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in December 1999, I have a soft-spot for supporting cancer-curing efforts,” Sheehan said.

This was Sheehan’s first time growing a beard in over 20 years and considers it a privilege and honor to grow a beard despite the work involved. 

“In the past, since college, I had grown my beard seasonally,” Sheehan said. “My family is not too happy that my beard is so white but I plan to keep it for the winter and shave it off in the spring.

 “It is a lot more work than people realize, I would definitely rather shave and get it over with,” Sheehan continued.

Avid shaver, John King, the operational rations and equipment branch chief, described his first time participating in “No Shave November” as rather interesting.

“It has been great to just spend a month trying it out, seeing how it feelsand just being able to see how gray it is compared to what I expected,” King said. “It is weird having that much facial hair, not to add, the couple of strange looks you get from people who have not seen you in a long time.” 

Despite the participant’s unique experience growing their beards this past month, they all agreed that their participation in “No Shave November” was a great opportunity to bring awareness and show support to a worthy cause.
Exhibit 10.2

(Letterhead of Landry Montana Partners)

              LANDRYmontanapartners                    ric landry




                                   MEMORANDUM

TO:                  Edward Mooney, Director

FROM:                Ric Landry

DATE:                April 15, 2001

RE:                  Consulting Agreement/Options for Optika Investments Company

================================================================================

Edward, per our discussion, we have agreed to the following:

          1)  I will work with the company and recruit for the company the
              appropriate Directors and Management team. In addition I will
              perform general consulting assignments as called upon.

          2)  Beginning May 1st 2001, the company will pay me $10,000 per
              month for 1 year and pay at cost all my direct expenses on behalf
              of the company.

          The monies will accrue until two (2) events happen with the company:

          1)  An acquisition of an operating company into Optika (Direct Digital
              for example)

          2)  $4 million dollars is raised to fund the company.

          At that time all monies to date are due.

          In addition the company agrees to issue 150,000 options to me at a
          strike price not to exceed $1.50. All options will be fully vested and
          issues at the time of the first Acquisition.

          Please indicate your approval of this Agreement by signing; dating
          and keeping a copy and returning by fax a copy to me.

          Thanks



          Ric Landry
          Partner

          Approved By: /s/   Edward Mooney
                      ------------------------------------------

          Date:  4/15/01
               -------------------------------------------------
IN THE SUPRE N

AT STATE OF MONTANA

PR 20-00

IN RE THE MOTION OF BYRON E. GRUBER FOR

ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF

MONTANA

FILED

SEP 1 5 2020

Bowen Greenw000

Clerk of Supreme Couri

StatEepRAEPE

Byron E. Gruber has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of Montana

pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions

Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on

Character and Fitness has certified that Gruber has provided the necessary documentation

and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V.

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions

Administrator, Byron E. Gruber may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk

of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State

Bar of Montana.

DATED this 16' -aay of September, 2020.

Chief Justice

a

09/15/2020

Case Number: PR 20-0005
L.4111,0 .Z

;1 n/1 4

Justices
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-2870

___________________________

Clayton Walker

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Steve Barnett, Secretary of State, in his official capacity; Shantel Krebs, in her

individual capacity; Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity; Jason Ravnsborg, in

his official capacity; Kea Warne, in her official capacity

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of South Dakota - Southern

 ____________

 Submitted: March 22, 2021

Filed: April 2, 2021

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Clayton Walker appeals following the district court’s1

 adverse grant of

summary judgment in his civil action challenging the constitutionality of certain

South Dakota election laws. Upon careful de novo review, see Odom v. Kaizer, 864

F.3d 920, 921 (8th Cir. 2017) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo);

Libertarian Party of N.D. v. Jaeger, 659 F.3d 687, 692-93 (8th Cir. 2011) (dismissal

for failure to state a claim is reviewed de novo), we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Walker’s appellate motions.

______________________________

1The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the

District of South Dakota.

-2-
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                               CET SERVICES, INC.
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     I certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Amendment
No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of CET Services, Inc. for the
period ending December 31, 2005:

     (1)  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of CET
Services, Inc.




/s/ Dale W. Bleck
Dale W. Bleck
Chief Financial Officer
April 21, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to CET Services, Inc. and will
be retained by CET Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request.
#### Judith McRoberts TODD, Individually and as Executrix of the Estate of George W. Todd, III, Deceased, and Judith McRoberts Todd, as mother and next friend of George W. Todd, IV, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 75-1876.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 31, 1977.

*385Homer H. Humphries, Jr., Jacksonville, Fla., MacLean & Brooke, Alban E. Brooke, Jacksonville, Fla., Banner & McIntosh, Jack G. Banner, Wichita Falls, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.

John L. Briggs, U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Mark A. Dombroff, Robert R. Smiley, III, Fed. Aviation Agency, U. S. Dept, of Justice, Leonard Schaitman, Eloise E. Davies, Appellate Sec., Civil Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellee.

Before WISDOM, GEE and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated in detail by the trial court, 384 F.Supp. 1284, M.D.Fla. 1975, we hold that the United States was not liable to the plaintiff1 under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80 (1970). The plaintiffs’ claims are barred by the decedent’s contributory negligence.2 The record clearly supports the district court’s conclusion:

> On his approach to Talladega Todd [the deceased pilot] either recklessly commenced descent with little or no visibility in known mountainous terrain or, through a lack of pre-flight preparation, found it necessary blindly to descend in unfamiliar surroundings without any communication of his predicament to ATC. In either case, Todd’s conduct constituted negligence and a proximate cause of the crash.

384 F.Supp. at 1294.

The judgment is AFFIRMED.

1

. This action was brought by Judith McRoberts Todd as widow of George W. Todd, III, and as Executrix of the Estate of George W. Todd, III, deceased, and as mother and next friend of George W. Todd, IV, Linda Ellen Todd and Judith Allison Todd, all being children of the decedent, George W. Todd, III.

2

. The district court correctly stated:

> Contributory negligence is a complete defense to a claim of simple negligence, t?ut is no defense if willful or wanton negligence is proved. *Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Watson,*90 Ala. 68, 8 So. 249 (1890). Under Alabama case law the requisite willfulness requires the “conscious doing of some act or omission of some duty under knowledge of the existing conditions and conscious that from the doing of such act or omission of such duty injury will likely or probably result.” *Lankford v. Mong,*283 Ala. 24, 214 So.2d 301 (Ala.1968). Such a degree of negligence cannot be attributed to the United States under the facts of this case.

384 F.Supp. at 1294.
**EXHIBIT21.1**

 

**LISTOF SUBSIDIARIES OF POORE BROTHERS, INC.**

 
| **Name of Subsidiary**               | ** ** | **State of  Incorporation/Formation** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------|------------|
| La Cometa  Properties, Inc.     |       | Arizona                               |       |
| Tejas PB  Distributing, Inc.    |       | Arizona                               |       |
| Poore  Brothers – Bluffton, LLC |       | Delaware                              |       |
| Boulder  Natural Foods, Inc.    |       | Arizona                               |       |
| BN Foods, Inc.                  |       | Colorado                              |       |

 

----
**Exhibit 3.3**

** **

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

 

OF THE

 

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

 

OF

 

POORE BROTHERS, INC.

 

PooreBrothers, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of theGeneral Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), doeshereby certify as follows:

 

FIRST:  The Certificate of Incorporation of theCorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware onFebruary 23, 1995.

 

SECOND:  A Certificate of Amendment to theCertificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was filed with the Secretary ofState of the State of Delaware on March 2, 1995.

 

THIRD:  The Board of Directors of the Corporationhas duly and unanimously adopted the following resolution setting forth aproposed amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, asamended:

 

RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, asamended, be, and it hereby is, amended pursuant to Section 242 of the DelawareGeneral Corporation Law by striking Article FOURTH (relating to the authorizedcapital stock of the Corporation) in its entirety, and replacing therefor a newArticle FOURTH as follows:

 

FOURTH:  The total number of shares of all classes ofstock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is Fifty MillionFifty Thousand (50,050,000) shares, consisting of:

 

(a)     Fifty Thousand (50,000) shares of preferredstock, par value $100 per share (the “Preferred Stock”); and

 

(b)     Fifty Million (50,000,000) shares of commonstock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”).

 

FIFTH: That ata meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation held on October 6, 1999, theholders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock ofthe Corporation approved the amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation, asamended, set forth in this Certificate of Amendment.

 

SIXTH:  That this Amendment to the Certificate ofIncorporation, as amended, has been duly adopted in accordance with theprovisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State ofDelaware.

 

----

 

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, said Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment of theCertificate of Incorporation, as amended, to be signed by its President andattested by its Secretary as of this 7th day of October, 1999.

 
|   | POORE BROTHERS,  INC. |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   |                  |
|   | By:                   |   |   |
|   |                  | Eric J.  Kufel |
|   |                  | President |
|   |                  |
|   | ATTEST:               |
|   |                  |
|   | By:                   |   |   |
|   |                  | Thomas W.  Freeze |
|   |                  | Secretary |

 

2

----