alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HEALTHCARE ACQUISITION CORP. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         193,899
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,946,435
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,358,278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          301,093
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,755
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,309,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,358,278
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               360,939
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  226,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,824
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                130,889
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            130,889
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   107,889
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                                RIGHTS AGREEMENT

        This FIRST AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT is entered into as of January
17, 2002 by and between CardioGenesis Corporation, a California corporation
formerly known as Eclipse Surgical Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") and
EquiServe Trust Company N.A., a national banking association (the "Rights
Agent").

                                 R E C I T A L S

        A. The Company and the Rights Agent are parties to that certain Rights
Agreement, dated August 17, 2001 (the "Rights Agreement").

        B. With the authorization and at the direction of its Board of
Directors, the Company wishes to amend the Rights Agreement in the following
certain respects.

                                A G R E E M E N T

        The Company and the Rights Agent agree as follows:

        1. Effective as of the date hereof, the following sentence shall be
inserted on page 2 of the Rights Agreement at the end of the definition of
"Acquiring Person," amending said definition as follows:

        "The foregoing shall only apply in its entirety to the State of
        Wisconsin Investment Board ("SWIB") as to when SWIB Beneficially Owns
        21% or more of the Voting Shares of the Company then outstanding."

        2. Except as set forth in paragraph 1 hereof, the Rights Agreement shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment
to Rights Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first written
above.

EQUISERVE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.,         CARDIOGENESIS CORPORATION
as Rights Agent


By: /s/ TYLER HAYNES                   By: /s/ DARRELL F. ECKSTEIN
   --------------------------------       --------------------------------
   Name: Tyler Haynes                     Name: Darrell F. Eckstein
        ---------------------------            ---------------------------------
   Title:  Managing Director              Title: V.P. Operations and Interim CFO
         --------------------------             --------------------------------


                                       6
256 La. 69

#### Lloyd A. COMEAUX, Individually, and For and on Behalf of His Minor Son, Robert Wayne Comeaux v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and Dr. John Travis Cunningham.

No. 50500.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 1970.

In re: Lloyd A. Comeaux applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 231 So.2d 674.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

May 05, 2006

Mr. Shawn Casey

Law Office of Shawn Casey

5433 Westheimer, Suite 920

Houston, TX 77056-5375

Mr. George W. Dana

Attorney at Law

11550 Fuqua, Suite 340

Houston, TX 77034

Ms. Rhonda Amkraut Pressley

Office of the Attorney General

Child Support Division

P. O. Box 12017 (MC 038-1)

Austin, TX 78711-2017

RE:Case Number:  03-0509

Court of Appeals Number:  13-00-00649-CV

Trial Court Number:  8139986

Style:IN THE INTEREST OF A.M. AND B.M., CHILDREN

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinions and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 03-0509Page 1**
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. James Eugene MATNEY and Leo Dean Welsh, Appellees.

No. M-78.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 9, 1970.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1970.

*178Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Joseph A. St. Ana, Jacksonville, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida has appealed a final judgment dismissing the information filed against appellees herein and discharging them from custody because of the State’s failure or refusal to divulge the name of its confidential informant whose information was used in part as a basis for procuring a search warrant. The judgment is reversed upon the authority of the decision of this court in the companion case of State of Florida v. James Eugene Matney, Leo Schuty a/k/a Leo Dean Welsh, and Susan Lind Hyers a/k/a Susan F. Matney, Case No. M-82, opinion filed this date, 236 So.2d 166.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 12.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I,
Luis Pacheco de Melo, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the company and have:



5.     The
company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors
and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
March 27, 2009

|    |  |                                                                                    |  | 
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ LUIS PACHECO DE MELO Name:  Luis Pacheco de Melo
Title:Chief Financial Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joe TERRELL, Don Wilkinson, Charles Roemer, Louis Leteff.

No. 61854.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 1978.

In re: State of La., through the District Attorney, applying for supervisory writs. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

*431Writ denied. There is insufficient showing to warrant exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction in view of alternative methods of prosecution available to the State.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Harry Stylli, Chief Executive Officer of Sequenom, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Quarterly Report)
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d), of the Exchange Act, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Quarterly Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has set their hands hereto as of the 7th day of May, 2008.



/s/ HARRY STYLLIHarry StylliChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>   1









                                   EXHIBIT 23













                                       80

<PAGE>   2













                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-55276 and Form S-8 No. 333-08267) pertaining to the Open Market Stock
Purchase Plan of Medical Assurance, Inc. of our report dated February 6, 1998,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Medical
Assurance, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1997.




Birmingham, Alabama
March 19, 1998



                                       81
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6322
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus THOMAS EDWARD STEWART, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-96-625-R) Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 30, 1997 Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Edward Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Stewart , No. CA-96-625-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 31, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Frank K. LEONARD, Appellant, v. PERRINE-CUTLER RIDGE BANK, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 68-1056.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 29, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 4, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 

IN RE: GEISINGER HEALTH AND 

EVANGELICAL COMMUNITY 

HOSPITAL HEALTHCARE 

WORKERS ANTITRUST 

LITIGATION 

 No. 4:21-CV-00196 

 (Chief Judge Brann) 

ORDER 

AND NOW, this 16th day of November 2021, in accordance with the 

accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. Defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 12(b)(6) (Doc. 51) is DENIED IN PART AND 

GRANTED IN PART, as follows: 

 a. DENIED as to Plaintiffs’ first claim for relief, which alleges a 

Sherman Act violation. 

 b. GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE as to Plaintiffs’ second 

claim for relief, which alleges a Pennsylvania law violation. 

2. Defendants’ motion to strike class allegations (Doc. 51) is DENIED. 

3. Further leave to amend is not granted. 

 4. Defendants’ request for oral argument (Doc. 64) is DENIED AS 

MOOT. 

 

Case 4:21-cv-00196-MWB Document 67 Filed 11/16/21 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

 5. Defendants shall file an Answer to the surviving claim in Plaintiffs’ 

Amended Complaint (Doc. 46) on or before December 7, 2021. 

 BY THE COURT: 

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

 Matthew W. Brann 

 Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:21-cv-00196-MWB Document 67 Filed 11/16/21 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24330]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Facility Development Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement, 
Shenandoah National Park, VA

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Council on Environmental Quality regulations and 
National Park Service policy, the National Park Service (NPS) announces 
the availability of the Facility Development Plan/Final Environmental 
Impact Statement (INT-FES-97-21) for Shenandoah National Park, 
Virginia. The plan and final EIS were prepared by the National Park 
Service in accordance with section 102(2)(C) of the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
    The Facility Development Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement 
is abbreviated. The draft and final environmental impact statements 
together describe the final plan, its alternatives, and all significant 
environmental impacts. Comments received on the draft environmental 
impact statement are included, as well as appropriate responses. No 
comments resulted in significant changes in the proposed action.
    Copies of the plan and final EIS will be distributed to cooperating 
agencies, interested groups, individuals and institutions, and local 
libraries. The plan will also be available at Shenandoah National Park 
administrative offices.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Connie Rudd, Assistant Superintendent, 
Shenandoah National Park, Route 4, Box 348, Luray, Virginia 22835. 
Telephone: (703) 999-3400.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A range of issues and preliminary 
alternatives for the Facility Development Plan were developed and 
analyzed. Alternatives considered included ``no action''; development 
of facilities and housing in accordance with the General Management 
Plan (1983); moving all housing and development out of the park; and a 
mixture of new or rehabilitated housing and facilities at selected 
locations throughout the park combined with leased housing in adjacent 
towns. For copies of the Facility Development Plan/Final Environmental 
Impact Statement please contact the Assistant Superintendent at the 
above address.
Marie Rust,
Regianl Director, Northeast Area.
[FR Doc. 97-24330 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 183 (Monday, September 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49505-49506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25066]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EC97-52-000]


New York State Electric & Gas Corporation; Notice of Filing

September 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, New York State Electric & Gas 
Corporation (``NYSEG'') tendered for filing pursuant to Section 203 of 
the

[[Page 49506]]

Federal Power Act an application for Commission approval to effect a 
corporate reorganization which involves the creation of a holding 
company and the transfer of certain contracts, all as more fully set 
forth in the application.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest the said filing 
should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions to intervene or protests should be filed on or before September 
29, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining 
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25066 Filed 9-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EDWIN MALPICA GARCIA, :

:

Plaintiff :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 3:CV-15-2447

:

A. JORDAN, ET AL., : (Judge Brann)

:

Defendants :

ORDER

January 11, 2016

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis motion is construed as a

motion to proceed without full prepayment of fees and

costs and the motion is GRANTED. 1

2. Garcia’s action is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE.

1 The Clerk of Court is directed to issue the Administrative Order to the

Warden directing the Warden to begin deducting money from the inmate’s account in

the manner described in the Administrative Order.

1

Case 4:15-cv-02447-MWB-JVW Document 8 Filed 01/11/16 Page 1 of 2
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.

4. Plaintiff’s motion seeking appointment of counsel (Doc.

3) is DENIED AS MOOT.

5. Any appeal from this Order will be deemed frivolous,

without probable cause and not taken in good faith.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

2

Case 4:15-cv-02447-MWB-JVW Document 8 Filed 01/11/16 Page 2 of 2
#### FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. v. HARRISON.

No. 38876.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 223 So.2d 336.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 5, 

2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00531-CV

THE CWEREN LAW FIRM, PLLC, Appellant

V.

SALEM SOLOMON, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1141556

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 26, 2020. On March 29, 

2022, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a)(1). The motion is granted. 

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.
# Official Journal C 146/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 146 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6423 April 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 146

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6423 April 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2021/C 146/01 | Position (EU) No 8/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1290/2013 and (EU) No 1291/2013Adopted by the Council on 16 March 2021 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 146/02 | Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 8/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1290/2013 and (EU) No 1291/2013 | 69 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2021/C 146/01

Position (EU) No 8/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1290/2013 and (EU) No 1291/2013Adopted by the Council on 16 March 2021 (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 146/02

Statement of the Council's reasons: Position (EU) No 8/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1290/2013 and (EU) No 1291/2013

69

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Oscar M. CREWS, Appellant, v. The CITY OF TAMPA, Florida, a Municipal corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 70-637.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 23, 1971.

Charles W. Bryan, Tampa, for appellant.

Wm. Reece Smith, Jr., and Joe H. Mount, Tampa, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, as to main appeal.

Cross-appeal, dismissed.

PIERCE, C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.