alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mary MATTHEWS, a/k/a Mary Melvin, Petitioner, v. Stefan M. STEIN, P. A., Respondent.

No. 78-970.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 16, 1978.

Frederick M. Lucarelli, Temple Terrace, for petitioner.

Stefan M. Stein of Law Offices of Stein & Frijouf, Tampa, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of common law cer-tiorari petitioner Mary Matthews seeks review of a judgment of the circuit court *377sitting in its appellate capacity reversing an order of the Hillsborough County Court. After reviewing the record we hold that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law and, therefore, the writ is granted.

Respondent Stefan M. Stein filed a complaint in the county court against petitioner seeking damages. Judgment was entered in favor of petitioner. Respondent subsequently appealed to the circuit court contending that the county court erred in denying his motion to consolidate this case with another case! A thorough search of the record fails to show that a written motion to consolidate was filed in the county court, and more significantly we have not found that an order was entered ruling on the merits of the motion.

Respondent did file an affidavit signed by him with the circuit court in which he averred that a motion to consolidate was orally made to the court and orally denied. On the strength of this affidavit the circuit court entered an order reversing the decision of the county court and directing that the two cases be consolidated and that the parties be afforded a new trial. Petitioner filed this petition for writ of certiorari in this court stating that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to review the order denying the motion to consolidate for the reason that the order had never been rendered. We agree. This court has held in prior cases in which this question was presented that an order is not rendered until it “has been reduced to writing, signed and made a matter of record” as required by Florida Appellate Rule 1.8.1*Florida Citrus Commission v. Griffin,*249 So.2d 42 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971); *Egantoff v. Herring,*177 So.2d 260 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965).

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, and the judgment of the circuit court is quashed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

1

. See also the new Rule 9.020(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, which defines rendition as “the filing of a signed, written order with the clerk of the lower tribunal.”
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 185 (Wednesday, September 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25285]



[[Page 49968]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4293-000]


San Diego Gas & Electric Company; Notice of Filing

September 18, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 22, 1997, San Diego Gas & Electric 
Company (SDG&E), tendered for filing and acceptance, pursuant to 18 CFR 
35.13, Service Agreements (Service Agreements) with the following 
entities for Point-To-Point Transmission Service under SDG&E's Open 
Access Transmission Tariff (Tariff) filed in compliance with FERC Order 
No. 888:

1. Engage Energy US, L.P.
2. NP Energy Inc.
3. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (Energy Trading)

    SDG&E filed the executed Service Agreements with the Commission in 
compliance with applicable Commission regulations. SDG&E also provided 
Sheet No. 114 (attachment E) to the Tariff, which is a list of 
concurrent subscribers. SDG&E requests waiver of the Commission's 
notice requirement to permit an effective date as specified in the 
Attachment E to the Tariff.
    Copies of this filing were served upon the Public Utilities 
Commission of the State of California and all interested parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before September 30, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25285 Filed 9-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 31.1



                                  CERTIFICATION

I, James M. Donegan, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form
10-K of The Med-Design Corporation; and

         2. Based on my knowledge, Amendment No. 1, does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Amendment
No. 1 to the annual report.

Date:    April 23, 2004

JAMES M. DONEGAN

----------------------------
James M. Donegan
Chief Executive Officer
MIRANDA GOLD CORP.

Unit 1  15782 Marine Drive

White Rock, B.C. V4B 1E6



Tel:  (604) 536-2711

Fax: (604) 536-2788





Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Miranda Gold Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kenneth D. Cunningham, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of her knowledge, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:

December 14, 2010



signed Kenneth D. Cunningham

____________________________________________________

Kenneth D. Cunningham, President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.























---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-18-00155-CR

Pedro Silva

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1486502R)

June 14, 2018

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgments. It is ordered that the judgments

of the trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
# EUR-Lex - 41998D0117 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 41998D0117

**The Schengen acquis - Decision of the Central Group of 27 October 1998 on the adoption of measures to fight illegal immigration (SCH/C (98) 117) **

*
Official Journal L 239 , 22/09/2000 P. 0205 - 0205 *

DECISION OF THE CENTRAL GROUP

of 27 October 1998

on the adoption of measures to fight illegal immigration

(SCH/C (98)117)

THE CENTRAL GROUP,

Having regard to Article 132 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement in conjunction with the Executive Committee Decision of 16 September 1998,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

The revised and finalised version of the action plan annexed hereto concerning measures to combat illegal immigration (SCH/Com-ex (98) 37def.) shall be brought into force pursuant to the mandate from the Executive Committee of 16 September 1998.

Brussels, 27 October 1998.

The Chairman

B. Schattenberg
```

[112th Congress Public Law 22]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 125 STAT. 236]]

Public Law 112-22
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 4865 Tallmadge Road in Rootstown, Ohio, as the ``Marine Sgt. Jeremy E. 
       Murray Post Office''. <<NOTE: June 29, 2011 -  [S. 349]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MARINE SGT. JEREMY E. MURRAY POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4865 Tallmadge Road in Rootstown, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Marine Sgt. Jeremy E. Murray Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Marine Sgt. 
Jeremy E. Murray Post Office''.

    Approved June 29, 2011.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 349:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 157 (2011):
            May 16, considered and passed Senate.
            June 21, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THOMASVILLE BANCSHARES, INC. FOR THE PERIOD FROM
JANUARY 1, 1999 TO DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                           <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        YEAR
<CASH>                               7,064,353
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                     518,757
<TRADING-ASSETS>                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>          9,036,737
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                 0
<LOANS>                              91,232,607
<ALLOWANCE>                          1,109,707
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       112,253,119
<DEPOSITS>                           98,151,286
<SHORT-TERM>                         2,395,136
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                  394,949
<LONG-TERM>                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                             1,380,000
<OTHER-SE>                           9,931,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>       112,253,119
<INTEREST-LOAN>                      7,340,869
<INTEREST-INVEST>                    579,067
<INTEREST-OTHER>                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                     7,919,936
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                   3,496,876
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   3,580,532
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                4,339,404
<LOAN-LOSSES>                        365,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                      2,605,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      1,983,542
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>           1,983,542
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                         1,222,542
<EPS-BASIC>                          .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .85
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                       4.69
<LOANS-NON>                          143,597
<LOANS-PAST>                         10,819
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                     647,442
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                      791,039
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                     868,477
<CHARGE-OFFS>                        126,511
<RECOVERIES>                         2,741
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                    1,109,707
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                 1,092,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>              17,707


</TABLE>
#### Simon MILLER et al., Carlton Tower, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership, and Jerome S. Murray, Appellants, v. PINELLAS COUNTY et al., Appellees.

Nos. 69-32—69-35.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 13, 1970.

Edward C. Tietig and Thomas G. Spicer, Miami, for appellants.

Daniel N. Martin, County Atty., and Ronald H. Schnell and Malcolm Mclnnis, Jr., Asst. County Attys., Clearwater, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of St. Joe Paper Co. v. Brown, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 725, and Adler-Built Industries, Inc., v. Metropolitan Dade County, Fla.1970, 231 So.2d 243.

LILES, A. C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 13

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Progen Industries Limited, a company organized under the
laws of the State of Queensland, Australia (the "Company"), does hereby certify
to such officer's knowledge that:

     The Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended June 30, 2004 (the
"Form 20-F/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Form 20-F/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Progen Industries Limited and will be retained by Progen
Industries Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


Dated:   April 14, 2005                     /s/ Lewis J. Lee
                                            ----------------
                                            Managing Director
                                            (Chief Executive Officer)

Dated:   April 14, 2005                     /s/ Linton W. P. Burns
                                            ----------------------
                                            Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24610]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Combined Arts Panel (Music 
Section 2) Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Public Law 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Combined Arts Advisory Panel, Music Section 2 (Creation & 
Presentation category) to the National Council on the Arts will be held 
on November 17-20, 1997. The panel will meet from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 
p.m. on November 17; from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on November 18; from 
9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on November 19; and from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. 
on November 20, in Room 730 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20506. A portion of this 
meeting, from 2:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. on November 19, will be open to 
the pubic for a policy discussion of guidelines, planning, Leadership 
Initiatives, Millennium projects, and field needs and trends.
    The remaining portions of this meeting, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 
p.m. on November 17; from 99:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on November 18; from 
9:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. on November 19; and from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. 
on November 20, are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, 
evaluation, and recommendation on applications for financial assistance 
under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 
1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the 
agency by grant applicants. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of March 31, 1997, these sessions will be closed to the public 
pursuant to subsection (c)(4), (6) and (9)(B) of section 552b of Title 
5, United States Code.
    Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory 
panels which are open to the public, and may be permitted to 
participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel 
chairman and with the approval of the full-time Federal employee in 
attendance.
    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact the Office of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 
1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20506, 202/682-5532, 
TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Committee Management Officer, National 
Endowment for the Arts, Washington, D.C. 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: September 11, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-24610 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION1350)

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of Empyrean Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the"Company"), on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Lee,President of the Company and, certify, pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect. 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

/s/ Robert L. Lee 

Robert L. Lee,

President and Director

 

Dated: October 10,2006
Exhibit 10.5
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONFIDENTIAL LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR 
NINTENDO DS
  RECITALS
   AMENDMENT
  1.
    
    The definition of Term as set forth in Section 2.20 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in
its entirety and replaced with the following; Term means six (6) years from the Effective Date.2.
    
    The Term of the Agreement shall now expire on April 30, 2011.3.
    
    All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This
First Amendment may be signed in counterparts, which together shall constitute one original
First Amendment.Signatures provided by facsimile shall be the equivalent of originals.
   NINTENDO:
    
    LICENSEE:Nintendo of America Inc.
    
    Majesco Entertainment CompanyBy:
    
    /s/ James R. Cannataro
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Jesse SuttonName: James R. Cannataro
    
    
    
    Name: Jesse SuttonIts: EVP, Administration
    
    
    
    Its: CEO
|   |         | Name of Subsidiary           |         | State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation |         | DBAs                     |
|--------|--------------|----------------------------------------|--------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|--------------------------|
|   |         |                                   |         |                                                       |         |                     |
| 1.     |         | Decision      Management Company, Inc. |         | California                                                 |         | Questys      Solutions   |
| 2.     |         | MessageVision,      Inc.               |         | California                                                 |         | None.                    |
| 3.     |         | GoSolutions,      Inc.                 |         | Florida                                                    |         | GoSolo      Technologies |
| 4.     |         | GoSolo      Technologies, Inc.         |         | Florida                                                    |         |                     |
| 5.     |         | GoSolutions      Canada, Inc.          |         | Canada                                                     |         |                     |
|   |    |                                   |    |                                                       |    |                     |

----
Case 4:06-cv-00031-JEJ Document 8 Filed 02/22/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,898
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,860,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (28,898)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,780
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,780
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)


</TABLE>
#### Gladys HELLER, Petitioner, v. SARASOTA BANK & TRUST COMPANY, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, and Florida Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 40777.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 19, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.