alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6322

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

THOMAS EDWARD STEWART,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-96-625-R)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 30, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Edward Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Stewart, No. CA-96-625-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 31,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
VI 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2090 

For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 13, 2005 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR IBRAHIM 

4 PARLAK. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Ibrahim Parlak shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) 

12 or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident. 
2 

•S 2090 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Ibrahim Parlak 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), Ibrahim Parlak shall be considered 

4 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall be eligible 

5 for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immi6 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date 

7 of enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Ibrahim Parlak, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of birth of Ibrahim Parlak under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, 

21 if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

22 made available to natives of the country of birth of 

23 Ibrahim Parlak under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 

24 1152(e)). 

Æ
#### William Tandy McELWEE, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Beverly Williams McELWEE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 11559.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Feb. 2, 1971.

Paul Henry Kidd, Monroe, for defendant-appellant.

Campbell, Campbell, Marvin & Johnson, by John T. Campbell, Minden, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before AYRES, PRICE and HALL, JJ.

PRICE, Judge.

In this action William Tandy McElwee, Jr. filed suit for final divorce from his wife, Beverly Williams McElwee, alleging that more than one year and sixty days had expired since a separation judgment was obtained by his wife without her having filed any action for final divorce. A reconventional demand was filed by Mrs. McElwee in which she asked the court to award her the sum of $400.00 per month as permanent alimony. On June 4, 1968, judgment was rendered and signed awarding the divorce as prayed for but withholding a decision on the question of permanent alimony.

The court filed a written opinion giving its reasons for denying permanent alimony to Mrs. McElwee on March 4, 1969. No formal judgment was prepared and signed in response to the trial judge’s reasons for decision. On March 18, 1969, a motion for *37a new trial on the question of alimony was filed, and on April 20, 1970, a judgment was signed rejecting the motion for a new trial. On April 20, 1970, a motion was made for a devolutive appeal to the judgment signed on April 20, 1970, and orders of appeal were granted by the court.

Although the appellant in his written order for appeal signified that he is appealing from a final judgment rendered on the 20th day of April, 1970, there is no appeala-ble judgment contained in the record of this case.

In essence, we find the same deficiency in the record before us as contained in the companion case to this, McElwee v. McElwee, La.App., 244 So.2d 35.

For the reasons set forth in that opinion, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice at the cost of the appellant.
Exhibit 23.1  Consent
of KPMG LLP  The Board of Directors and Stockholders
FTD, Inc.:  We consent to the incorporation by reference
in the registration statements (No. 333-96627 and No. 333-101203) on Form S-8
of FTD, Inc. of our reports dated July 29, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheet of FTD, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2002,
and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period
then ended, and the related financial statement schedule, which reports appear
in the June 30, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of FTD, Inc.  /S/ KPMG LLP  Chicago, Illinois
September 12, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 202 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 202

                 For the relief of Gustav F.K. Wallner.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2005

  Mr. Stevens introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Gustav F.K. Wallner.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Gustav F.K. 
Wallner shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to 
the United States for permanent residence as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Gustav F.K. Wallner as 
provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by 1 during the current fiscal year the total number 
of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Case Nos. 4:13-CR-00117

: 4:14-CR-00074

:

v. : (Judge Brann)

:

RODGER KENT WILLIAMS, :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

November 24, 2015

AND NOW, in accordance with a Memorandum of this same date, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Under

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF Nos. 49 & 10) is DENIED.

2. Petitioner’s Motion to Appoint Counsel (ECF Nos. 50 & 11) is also

DENIED as moot.

3. A Certificate of Appealability shall not issue. 

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to notify Petitioner of this disposition. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s Matthew W. Brann

Matthew W. Brann 

United States District Judge

Case 4:14-cr-00074-MWB Document 21 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOSEPH E. DIXON, : Case No. 4:13-CV-2762 

 : 

 Plaintiff : (Judge Brann) 

 : 

 v. : 

 : 

ROGER WILLIAMS, et al., : (Magistrate Judge Mehalchick) 

 : 

 Defendants : 

ORDER

September 28, 2015 

BACKGROUND:

Pro se Plaintiff initiated the instant action on October 7, 2013. ECF No. 1. 

Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on September 29, 2014. ECF No. 39. On 

August 3, 2015, Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick submitted a report and 

recommendation regarding Plaintiff’s amended complaint. ECF No. 65. Plaintiff 

filed objections to the report and recommendation on September 11, 2015 and 

September 17, 2015. ECF Nos. 70 & 71. On September 24, 2015, Plaintiff 

withdrew the September 11, 2015 objection. ECF No. 72. Defendant filed an 

objection to the report and recommendation on August 17, 2015. ECF No. 66. 

The undersigned has given full and independent consideration to the report 

and recommendation of the magistrate judge, together with the objections from 

Case 4:13-cv-02762-MWB Document 73 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 3
2 

both parties. Because this Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Mehalchick’s 

assessment, the Court will not rehash the sound reasoning of the magistrate judge 

and will adopt the report and recommendation in its entirety. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The August 3, 2015 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge 

Mehalchick is ADOPTED in full. ECF No. 65. 

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint is GRANTED 

IN PART and DENIED IN PART. ECF No. 42. 

3. Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment due process claim is DISMISSED 

WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) 

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 

4. Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim is DISMISSED 

WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) 

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 

5. Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment excessive use of force claim is DISMISSED 

WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) 

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 

6. Plaintiff is permitted to proceed with his Fourth Amendment false 

Case 4:13-cv-02762-MWB Document 73 Filed 09/28/15 Page 2 of 3
arrest/illegal seizure claims; 

7. Plaintiff is permitted to proceed with his claims under the Pennsylvania 

Uniform Criminal Extradition Act; 

8. This matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Mehalchick for further 

proceedings. 

BY THE COURT: 

 /s Matthew W. Brann 

 Matthew W. Brann 

 United States District Judge 

Case 4:13-cv-02762-MWB Document 73 Filed 09/28/15 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


CRADA With E.I. DuPont; Selected Sulfonylurea Herbicides in Water 
Resources of the Midwestern U.S.

AGENCY: Geological Survey, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Geological Survey (USGS) is contemplating 
entering into a CRADA with E.I. DuPont to assess the occurrence of 
selected sulfonylurea herbicides in water resources of the midwestern 
United States.

INQUIRIES: If any other parties are interested in similar activities 
with the USGS, please contact William Battaglin, USGS, (303) 236-5950 
ext. 202, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0a7b2b1a4a4b1b7bc90a5a3b7a3feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ff8edeefbfbeee8e3cffafce8fca1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is to meet the USGS requirement 
stipulated in the Survey Manual.
Robert M. Hirsch,
Chief Hydrologist.
[FR Doc. 97-24650 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-31-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2787 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2787

     To authorize the Federal Communications Commission to process 
applications for spectrum licenses from applicants who were successful 
bidders in an auction before the authority of the Commission to conduct 
                   auctions expired on March 9, 2023.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2023

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To authorize the Federal Communications Commission to process 
applications for spectrum licenses from applicants who were successful 
bidders in an auction before the authority of the Commission to conduct 
                   auctions expired on March 9, 2023.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``5G Spectrum Authority Licensing 
Enforcement Act'' or the ``5G SALE Act''.

SEC. 2. FCC PROCESSING OF APPLICATIONS FOR SPECTRUM LICENSES AWARDED BY 
              AUCTION.

    In the case of any applicant for a license or permit for the use of 
spectrum in the band of frequencies between 2496 megahertz and 2690 
megahertz, inclusive, that the Federal Communications Commission 
selected through a system of competitive bidding conducted under 
section 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 309(j)) on 
or before March 9, 2023, and to whom the Commission has not granted the 
license or permit as of the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Commission may process the application of the applicant during the 90-
day period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2014

s0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2014

148505

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148505

COA: 317705

Monroe CC: 12

- 039858

- FH

KEVIN LEE DEESE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 15, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
II 

Calendar No. 591 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2784 

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 to adjust 

the boundary of the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VANCE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

NOVEMBER 21, 2024 

Reported by Mr. MANCHIN, with an amendment 

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act 

of 1992 to adjust the boundary of the Dayton Aviation 

Heritage National Historical Park, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2784 RS

1 SECTION 1. DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE NATIONAL HIS2 TORICAL PARK BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT. 

3 Section 101 of the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preser4 vation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 410ww) is amended by add5 ing at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(d) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.—In addition to the 

7 sites described in subsections (b) and (c), the boundary 

8 of the park is adjusted to include approximately 1 acre 

9 of land in Dayton, Ohio, depicted as ‘Proposed Addition’ 

10 on the map entitled ‘Dayton Aviation Heritage National 

11 Historical Park Proposed Boundary Addition’ and dated 

12 February 2023, numbered 362/193,730, and dated June 

13 2024.’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 591 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2784 

A BILL 

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage PreservaPark, and for other purposes. Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical tion Act of 1992 to adjust the boundary of the 

NOVEMBER 21, 2024 

Reported with an amendment 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

IN THE MATTER OF: STACY JOHNSON :

:

:

No. 77 WM 2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2014, the Emergency Motion for Extension 

of Rule 321(b) Certification is GRANTED. Ms. Johnson’s Rule 321 certification will 

expire on December 31, 2014.
EXHIBIT23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, IndependentAuditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-98738, No. 333-39407, No.333-38730 and No. 333-67050) pertaining to the Vion Pharmaceuticals,Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, As Amended, in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-53772) pertaining to the VionPharmaceuticals, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-115027) pertaining to the VionPharmaceuticals, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan and Senior Executive StockOption Plan and in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-37941,No. 333-61477, No. 333-79939, No. 333-95671 and No. 333-58206) of VionPharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report datedJanuary 23, 2004, except with respect to Note 12, as to which the dateis March 12, 2004, with respect to the financial statements of VionPharmaceuticals, Inc. included in the Amendment to Annual Report (Form10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

|  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|--|---------------------------|

Boston, MassachusettsMay 5,2004

----
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robin Smyth certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ROO Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

         (a) designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that material  information  relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others,  particularly  during the period in which this  report is
being prepared;

         (b)  evaluated  the   effectiveness  of  the  small  business  issuer's
disclosure  controls  and  presented  in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent functions);

         (a) all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the small  business  issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

November 18, 2005

 /s/ Robin Smyth
--------------------------------
Robin Smyth
Chief Financial Officer
# Commander meets with Chesterfield County leadership

/ Published Oct. 23, 2017
Richmond, Va. , Defense Logistics Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Linda Hurry met with Chesterfield County Administrator Dr. Joseph Casey (right); Deputy County Administrator for Finance and Administration Lou Lassiter and Chesterfield County Bermuda District Supervisor Dorothy Jaeckle Oct. 19 to discuss DLA Aviation’s mission, as well as future partnership opportunities with the county and community. DLA Aviation’s headquarters is located on Defense Supply Center Richmond in Chesterfield County, Virginia. DSCR is also home to other DLA activities, as well as several Department of Defense and other organizations on the 600-acre installation including the U.S. Naval History and Heritage Command Collection Management Facility, the Virginia Army National Guard and the U.S. Army Reserve 80th Training Command.DSCR is has a significant economic impact in Chesterfield County and within the Commonwealth of Virginia. With hundreds of millions of dollars in wages and industry sales and thousands of jobs, the financial impact on the state, as reported in a 2013 Economic Impact Analysis prepared by the Virginal Employment Commission, is $315,741,632.Personnel from DSCR organizations have been important members of the Chesterfield County and Richmond-Metro communities since the installation was activated in 1942.  Recent community involvement includes:  yearly blood drives supporting local area hospitals and blood banks, an annual angel tree program supporting three Chesterfield County and one Richmond school, annual giving through the Combined Federal Campaign and partnerships with various civic organizations throughout the local area.