alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST COMMUNITY
                              FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                     PROMISSORY NOTE MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

                                Modification # 2

Date:   December 30,  1996      Borrower: Poore Brothers Arizona, Inc., Fka
Obligation #00011                         Poore Brothers Southwest, Inc.
                                          an Arizona corporation

         The undersigned (individually/collectively  "Borrower"), is indebted to
First Community  Financial  Corporation  ("Lender")  under that certain Multiple
Advance  Promissory  Note,  dated  July 26,  1996,  in the  original  amount  of
$200,000.00, which has been amended and modified from time to time (the "Note").

         Borrower and Lender hereby agree that the Note shall be modified in the
following respects:

         1). Effective January 1, 1997,  interest shall be charged on the unpaid
         principal  balance hereof, to the date of maturity on a daily basis for
         the actual number of days any portion of said principal is outstanding,
         at the rate (the "Note  Rate") equal to the prime rate  announced  from
         time to time by Bank One,  Phoenix,  Arizona  (whether or not it is the
         lowest rate  actually  charged by such bank) plus 3.5 % per annum.  The
         current  Note Rate  under the note is 11.75 % per  annum  based  upon a
         prime rate of 8.25 %. In the event such prime rate is from time to time
         hereafter changed,  the Note Rate of interest shall  correspondingly be
         adjusted as of the effective  date of the prime rate change;  provided,
         however, that the Note Rate payable hereunder shall in no event be less
         than 11.75% per annum.

         2) All other terms and conditions shall remain-unchanged.

Except as amended hereby,  the Note (as the same may have been amended from time
to time)  shall  continue  in full force and effect and is hereby  ratified  and
confirmed.

Dated this 30th day of December, 1996.

Agreed & Accepted                          Agreed & Accepted

Poore Brothers Arizona, Inc.               First Community Financial Corporation
Fka Poore Brothers Southwest, Inc.         an Arizona corporation
an Arizona corporation
     "Borrower"                                   "Lender"

By:  /s/ David J. Brennan                  By:  /s/ James C. Adamany
    -------------------------------            ---------------------------------
    David J. Brennan, President and             James C. Adamany, President
    Chief Executive Officer

Its: President and Chief Executive         Its: President
     -----------------------------              ---------
     Officer
     -------

Dated:  December 30, 1996                  Dated:  December 30, 1996
        -----------------                          -----------------
#### Emmett J. LORD, Appellant, v. Maxine LORD, Appellee.

No. EE-169.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 8, 1977.

Franklin R. Harrison of Davenport, Johnston, Harris, Gerde & Harrison, Panama City, for appellant.

Herman D. Laramore, Marianna, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Our examination of the record reveals that the learned trial judge was required to make difficult decisions based upon complex and confusing evidence adduced in support of, and in opposition to, issues poorly framed by the pleadings and that he obviously attempted to “do equity”. (See F.S. 61.08(2)) We do not find that appellant has met his burden of demonstrating abuse of discretion nor reversible error. The final judgment here appealed is therefore

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, J., concur.

MILLS, J., dissents.

MILLS, Judge

dissenting:

I dissent.

Mrs. Lord did not claim nor prove a special equity in the home. She did not seek nor prove partition. Nor did she claim or prove an award of the home as lump sum alimony. It was error for the trial court to *358award Mrs. Lord, Mr. Lord’s interest in the home.

The facts before us fail to support the trial court’s award of rehabilitative alimony to Mrs. Lord. She was employed. Her ability to earn a living was not decreased by her marriage. Her net worth was equal to that of Mr. Lord. The award of rehabilitative alimony was error.

The award of attorney’s fees to Mrs. Lord was error also because her financial condition was as good as that of Mr. Lord.

I would reverse the judgment of the trial court except as to the award of the household furnishings to Mrs. Lord which I would affirm.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2131 

To amend title 9, United States Code, to provide for greater fairness in 

the arbitration process relating to livestock and poultry contracts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 16, 2005 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. HARKIN, and Mr. HAGEL) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 9, United States Code, to provide for greater 

fairness in the arbitration process relating to livestock 

and poultry contracts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Contracts for 

5 Growers Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELECTION OF ARBITRATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 9, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 
2 

•S 2131 IS

1 ‘‘§ 17. Livestock and poultry contracts 

2 ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

3 ‘‘(1) LIVESTOCK.—The term ‘livestock’ has the 

4 meaning given the term in section 2(a) of the Pack5 ers and Stockyards Act, 1921 (7 U.S.C. 182(a)). 

6 ‘‘(2) LIVESTOCK OR POULTRY CONTRACT.—The 

7 term ‘livestock or poultry contract’ means any 

8 growout contract, marketing agreement, or other ar9 rangement under which a livestock or poultry grower 

10 raises and cares for livestock or poultry. 

11 ‘‘(3) LIVESTOCK OR POULTRY GROWER.—The 

12 term ‘livestock or poultry grower’ means any person 

13 engaged in the business of raising and caring for 

14 livestock or poultry in accordance with a livestock or 

15 poultry contract, whether the livestock or poultry is 

16 owned by the person or by another person. 

17 ‘‘(4) POULTRY.—The term ‘poultry’ has the 

18 meaning given the term in section 2(a) of the Pack19 ers and Stockyards Act, 1921 (7 U.S.C. 182(a)). 

20 ‘‘(b) CONSENT TO ARBITRATION.—If a livestock or 

21 poultry contract provides for the use of arbitration to re22 solve a controversy under the livestock or poultry contract, 

23 arbitration may be used to settle the controversy only if, 

24 after the controversy arises, both parties consent in writ25 ing to use arbitration to settle the controversy. 
3 

•S 2131 IS

1 ‘‘(c) EXPLANATION OF BASIS FOR AWARDS.—If arbi2 tration is elected to settle a dispute under a livestock or 

3 poultry contract, the arbitrator shall provide to the parties 

4 to the contract a written explanation of the factual and 

5 legal basis for the award.’’. 

6 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

7 The table of sections for chapter 1 of title 9, United States 

8 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘17. Livestock and poultry contracts.’’. 

9 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

10 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to 

11 a contract entered into, amended, altered, modified, re12 newed, or extended after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STEVEN J. MUNIC, :

:

Plaintiff :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-13-2245

:

WARDEN DAVID LANGAN, ET AL., : (Judge Brann)

:

Defendants :

ORDER

October 4, 2016

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1. This action is DISMISSED for failure of the deceased

Plaintiff’s representatives/successors to prosecute.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.

3. Any appeal from this Order will be deemed frivolous, without

probable cause and not taken in good faith.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

Case 4:13-cv-02245-MWB-JVW Document 123 Filed 10/04/16 Page 1 of 1
### Geology and ground-water resources of the Henderson area, Kentucky

By: Edward Joseph Harvey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1356

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 12**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 13**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Preliminary structural map showing contours on the horizon of number 9 coal in the Henderson area, Kentucky(1951)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### FLORIDA GAS CO., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 69-464.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 27, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal quashed.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Rivet Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  August 12, 2003
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Dennis R. Casey, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Remote Dynamics, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: June 24, 2005                                         /s/ Dennis R. Casey   Dennis R. Casey, President and Chief Executive   Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2472]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Eye Institute Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Clinical Research.
    Date: February 27, 1997.
    Time: 9:00 a.m.
    Place: National Eye Institute, Executive Plaza South, Suite 
#350, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7164.
    Contact Person: Andrew P. Mariani, Ph.D., Executive Plaza South, 
Room 350, 6120 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7164, (301) 469-
5561.
    Purpose/Agenda: Review of Grant Applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.867, Vision 
Research: National Institutes of Health.)

    Dated: January 23, 1997.
Paula N. Hayes,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-2472 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### William C. SIMPSON, Appellant, v. Raymond Wiley CLARK et al., Appellees.

No. N-174.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 15, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in this automobile accident case, appellant-plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in two respects, viz.: (1) By failing to direct a verdict in his favor on the question of liability, and (2) By permitting counsel for one of the defendants, over plaintiff’s objection, to read from an instrument not introduced in evidence and without allowing plaintiff’s counsel to examine same, the purpose being to impeach or refresh a witness’ memory.

A full review of the evidence convinces us that a factual issue as to the question of negligence on the part of defendants was properly submitted to the jury by the trial judge and thus the trial judge did not err in denying plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict, and post trial motions. As to the second point on appeal, although the trial judge might well have erred in failing to permit plaintiff’s counsel to examine the subject instrument, the error was not of such consequence that a new trial must be ordered, and in light of the entire proceedings, any error in this respect falls within the harmless error doctrine.

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., RAWLS, J., and GOODFRIEND, SAM, Associate Judge, concur.
January 2007

FSA is committed to working with 

producers/borrowers to assist them 

in resolving any delinquency. If 

loan restructure is not feasible, 

interest rates may be lowered 

or the debt may be written down 

under certain circumstances. If the 

borrower has accepted a written 

offer from FSA to restructure the 

account, payments will not be 

offset. If the borrower presents an 

acceptable written plan that can be 

approved by FSA and will resolve 

the delinquency, the offset can be 

lifted. Guaranteed debtors can 

submit an offer directly to FSA to 

settle their Federal debt after a fi nal 

loss claim has been paid.

All USDA payments due delinquent 

producers/borrowers will be offset 

unless a statutory provision bars 

that action.

Under law, delinquent debt owed 

to Federal agencies must be offset 

against any payments due from the 

Federal Government. The Debt 

Collection Improvement Act of 1996 

(DCIA), effective April 26, 1996, 

was passed to increase collections 

of Federal non-tax debt.

The Farm Service Agency (FSA) 

is required to collect payments 

that otherwise would be made to 

producers/borrowers who owe 

Commodity Credit Corporation 

(CCC), or delinquent direct 

farm loan program debt, unless 

the borrower can present an 

acceptable plan to resolve the 

delinquency. FSA is also required 

to offset payments to guaranteed 

farm loan program debtors who 

received loans after July 20, 2001, 

if a fi nal loss claim has been paid 

on a loan. Payments subject to 

offset are issued by the United 

States and include:

■ Program payments;

■ Tax refunds;

■ Federal salary offset, including 

military pay;

■ Federal retirement pay, including 

military retirement pay;

■ Contract or vendor payments;

■ Social Security, including Social 

Security Disability;

■ Railroad retirement, other than 

tier two payments; and

■ Black lung.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) 

prohibits discrimination in all its programs and 

activities on the basis of race, color, national 

origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, 

marital status, familial status, parental status, 

religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, 

political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part 

of an individual’s income is derived from any 

public assistance program. (Not all prohibited 

bases apply to all programs.) Persons with 

disabilities who require alternative means for 

communication of program information (Braille, 

large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact 

USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice 

and TDD). To fi le a complaint of discrimination, 

write USDA, Director, Offi ce of Civil Rights, 

1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, 

DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 or (202) 

720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity 

provider and employer.

Fact Sheet

Administrative Offset

Debt Owed to Federal Agencies

United States

Department of

Agriculture
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of KIT digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kaleil Isaza
      Tuzman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
      be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing.








Date:
                November 14, 2008
            
            /s/
                Kaleil Isaza TuzmanKaleil
                Isaza Tuzman
              Chief
                Executive Officer