alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 Attachment 

Hi Brad:

Here is the completed 8700‐1 for our Master’s degree program.

Please let me know if you need additional explanation or information.

Tim

Tim Brady, Ph.D.

Dean, College of Aviation

Daytona Beach campus

From: Bradley.Palmer@faa.gov [mailto:Bradley.Palmer@faa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 2:31 PM 

To: Brady, Tim 

Cc: Jeffrey.Smith@faa.gov 

Subject: ERAU Petition for Exemption: Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0821 

Importance: High

 

Dr. Brady: 

The FAA is actively processing Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University's (ERAU) petition for exemption which posted in the Federal

Register on September 13, 2013. In that request, ERAU requested relief from § 61.160(c)(1) to allow graduates of ERAU’s 

Master of Science in Aeronautics (MSA) Professional Pilot specialization degree program, to be eligible for the restricted privileges 

airline transport pilot (ATP) certificate in accordance with § 61.160(c). 

In order to continue processing this request, the FAA requires additional information from ERAU regarding the coursework a 

graduate may enroll in that satisfies the criteria listed in the regulation and Advisory Circular (AC) 61-139: Institution of Higher 

Education’s Application for Authority to Certify its Graduates for an Airline Transport Pilot Certificate with Reduced Aeronautical 

Experience. The additional information can be conveyed on FAA form 8700-1: Institution of Higher Education’s Application for 

Authority to Certify its Graduates for an Airline Transport Pilot Certificate with Reduced Aeronautical Experience in order to assist 

in the submission. 

Thank you for your time in this matter. 

Thank you, 

Brad Palmer 

Aviation Safety Inspector 

Airmen Certification and Training Branch, AFS-810 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

(202) 385-9614 

RE: ERAU Petition for Exemption: Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0821 

Brady, Tim 

to: 

Bradley Palmer 

02/28/2014 02:16 PM 

Hide Details 

From: "Brady, Tim" <bradyt@erau.edu> 

To: Bradley Palmer/AWA/FAA@FAA, 

8700-1 Masters.pdf

3/3/2014 5:26:18 AM

Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2448]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3673]


Saint-Gobain/Norton Industrial Ceramics Corporation; Prohibited 
Trade Practices, and Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent Order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order requires, among other things, a 
Massachusetts-based corporation to divest businesses and associated 
assets in the United States markets for fused cast refractories, hot 
surface igniters, and silicon carbide refractory bricks. If the 
divestiture is not completed as required, the Commission may appoint 
one or more trustees to divest the remaining properties and assets.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued June 12, 1996.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Compliant and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Howard Morse, FTC/S-3627, Washington, DC, 20580. (202) 326-2949.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Thursday, March 7, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register 61 FR 9167, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Saint-Gobain/Norton Industrial 
Ceramics Corporation, for the purpose of soliciting public comment. 
Interested parties were given sixty (60) days in which to submit 
comments, suggestions or objections regarding the proposed form of the 
order.
    Comments were filed and considered by the Commission. The 
Commission has ordered the issuance of the compliant in the form 
contemplated by the agreement, made its jurisdictional findings and 
entered an order to divest, as set forth in the proposed consent 
agreement, in disposition of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interpret or apply sec. 5, 38 
Stat. 719, as amended; sec. 7, 38 Stat. 731, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 
45, 18)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2448 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 159 (Monday, August 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21752]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-603-001]

Egan Hub Partners, L.P.; Notice of Petition to Amend

August 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 8, 1997, Egan Hub Partners, L.P. (Egan 
Hub) 44084 Riverside Parkway, Suite 340, Leesburg, Virginia 20176, 
filed, in Docket No. CP97-603-001, an amendment to its pending 
application in Docket No. CP97-603-000 requesting authorization to 
operate each of the previously certificated Compressor Units 3 and 4 at 
the Egan Hub Storage Facility in Acadia Parish, Louisiana at its full 
rated horsepower of 4,450, all as more fully set forth in the 
application which is on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said amendment should on or before September 12, 1997, 
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in 
accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the 
Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission 
will be considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be 
taken but will not serve to make the protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or to 
participate as a party in any hearing therein must file a motion to 
intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules. All persons who 
have heretofore filed need not file again.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21752 Filed 8-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### Louis BECKER, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. POOLE AND KENT COMPANY et al., Respondents, Cross-Petitioners.

No. 40716.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 26, 1971.

Edward Schroll, Miami, for petitioner-cross-respondent.

Carl Jenkins, of Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl, Fort Lauder-dale, for cross-petitioners-respondents.

Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for Industrial Relations Commission, respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari to the Industrial Relations Commission. After, the cause was set for argument on Thursday, May 13, 1971, argument was waived by the parties.

We have examined the record and briefs and find that in entering the order sought to he reviewed the Commission did not depart from the essential requirements of law.

Accordingly, petition and cross-petition for writ of certiorari are denied. Petition for attorney’s fees is granted in the amount of $350.00.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

This certification set forth below is hereby madesolely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any otherpurposes.

In connection with the Annual Report of Ezenia! Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Khoa D. Nguyen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
| Date: March 31, 2005 | By:    | /s/ KHOA D.  NGUYEN       |   |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | Khoa D. Nguyen            |
|                      |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|                      |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material                respects the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                                                             |                                     |
|--------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                        |                                |
|         |                                                                                                             | /s/ Weibing                      Lu |
|         |                                                                                                                  |
|         | Weibing                        Lu Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 18,                        2006  |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2794 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2794

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to make fraudulent dealings in 
       firearms and ammunition unlawful, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2023

  Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Blumenthal, and Mr. 
    Booker) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to make fraudulent dealings in 
       firearms and ammunition unlawful, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping the Fraudulent Sales of 
Firearms Act''.

SEC. 2. FRAUDULENT DEALINGS IN FIREARMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 922(a) of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (9), by striking the period and at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(10) for any person--
                    ``(A) to import, manufacture, or sell a firearm or 
                ammunition by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, 
                representations, or promises; and
                    ``(B) to transmit or cause to be transmitted, by 
                means of wire, radio, or television communication in 
                interstate or foreign commerce, any communication 
                relating to the importation, manufacture, or sale 
                described in subparagraph (A).''.
    (b) Penalty.--Section 924(a)(1)(B) of title 18, United States Code, 
is amended by inserting ``(a)(10),'' before ``(f)''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Leroy F. CLADD, Relator, v. Louis L. WAINWRIGHT, Director Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-25.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 8, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 21, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas Corpus dismissed.
# L_2019070EN.01003201.xml

| 12.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 70/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 70/32

---

DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2019/390 OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

of 6 March 2019

appointing a Judge to the Court of Justice

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 19 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 253 and 255 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The terms of office of 14 Judges and five Advocates-General of the Court of Justice expired on 6 October 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The terms of office of 14 Judges and five Advocates-General of the Court of Justice expired on 6 October 2018.

| (2) | Mr Andreas KUMIN has been nominated for the post of Judge of the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Mr Andreas KUMIN has been nominated for the post of Judge of the Court of Justice.

| (3) | The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on the suitability of Mr Andreas KUMIN to perform the duties of Judge of the Court of Justice, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on the suitability of Mr Andreas KUMIN to perform the duties of Judge of the Court of Justice,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Andreas KUMIN is hereby appointed Judge to the Court of Justice for the period from the date of entry into force of this Decision to 6 October 2024.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 March 2019.

The President

L. ODOBESCU

---
#### Raymond D. PARKS, Orville R. Parks and Ray’s Inn, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellants, v. ST. LUCIE PLAZA, a Joint Venture of Melvin F. Sembler, Fred A. Beshara, Individually and as Trustee, Albert L. Dangler and Nicholas Manos, Appellees.

No. 77-11.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 13, 1977.

Richard D. Sneed, Jr., of Richard D. Sneed, Jr., P.A., Fort Pierce, for appellants.

*598Vincent A. Lloyd, Fort Pierce, for appel-lees.

LETTS, Judge.

In the case now before us we see no purpose in reciting facts to produce a lengthy opinion.

The trial court granted a summary judgment despite the patent existence of properly pleaded issues of fact. Moreover in an extraordinary hearing, held in an attempt to set the summary judgment aside, some two months after rendition, the trial judge frankly and honestly admitted that he had made a mistake and that the “Plaintiffs (appellants) are entitled to the relief sought.” We commend him for his forthrightness in so doing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DOWNEY, J., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1492

NATIONAL SATELLITE SPORTS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARK A. SMOOT, Defendant - Appellant, and LTC, LLC, t/a Red Door Lounge, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-2616-AH) Submitted: October 29, 2003 Decided: February 18, 2004 Before GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark A. Smoot, Appellant Pro Se. Aron Uri Raskas, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The notice of appeal designates an order entered on March 14, 2003, but there is no such order in the record. - 3 - PER CURIAM: Mark A. Smoot seeks to appeal the district court’s entry of default judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 267 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on January 15, 2003. *The Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on April 17, 2003. Because the Appellant failed to file a timely notice of appeal, seek an extension of the appeal period, or seek a reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT
32.1




906
CERTIFICATION OF CERTIFYING OFFICER





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the accompanying Yearly Report On Form 10-K of CRC Crystal
Research Corporation for the Year Ended December 31, 2008 I, Kiril Pandelisev,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of CRC Crystal Research
Corporation hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:





1.
            Such
      Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
            The
      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year
      ended December 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of CRC Crystal Research
      Corporation





Dated:  March
27, 2009





CRC
CRYSTAL RESEARCH CORPORATION








By: /s/ Dr. Kiril
Pandelisev





Chief
Executive Officer








/s/
Don Meyers


Don
Meyers, Chief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2476** 

WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
JAMES A. HUNT , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. ( 5:11

- cv - 00035

- D )

Submitted : July 28, 2016 Decided: August 1, 2016

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

William Scott Davis, II , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order s denying his motions to reopen and to amend the judgment
in a closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. W e have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Hunt ,
No. 5:11

- cv - 00035

- D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 2, 2015; Nov . 23, 2015). We deny Davis’ motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED