alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24657]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[NAFTA-01476 and NAFTA-1476A]


Sun Apparel, Incorporated, NAFTA-01476 (Concepcion Plant) El 
Paso, Texas and NAFTA-1476A (Armour Plant) El Paso, Texas; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA-Transitional 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), the 
Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for 
NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance on March 21, 1997, applicable 
to all workers of Sun Apparel, Incorporated, Concepcion Plant in El 
Paso, Texas. The notice was published in the Federal Register on March 
31, 1997 (62 FR 15200).
    At the request of petitioners, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. Information provided by 
the State agency reveals that Sun Apparel has had worker separations at 
the Armour plant, El Paso, Texas, which is a sewing facility for the 
men's and women's jeans produced by the subject firm. Based on this 
information, the Department is amending the certification to include 
workers of the Armour plant of Sun Apparel in El Paso.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by increased 
imports of jeans from Mexico.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA-01476 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Sun Apparel, Incorporated, Concepcion Plant 
(NAFTA-01476) and Armour Plant (NAFTA-1476A), El Paso, Texas, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
March 10, 1997, are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 
250 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 26th day of August 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-24657 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
APPENDIX 9E 2009 INPUT LEV2EVAP.D

T2 EVAP PHASE-IN

0.40 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 

0.40 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 

0.40 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 

0.40 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 

0.40 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-949

_____________________________

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellant,

v.

RAUL HERNANDEZ-RODRIQUEZ,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Bruce Anderson, Judge.

May 3, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Steven E. Woods, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Valerie Jonas of Weitzner & Jonas, P.A., Miami, and Patrick F. 

Trese of The Law Office of Patrick Trese, P.A., Fort Lauderdale,

for Appellee.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Charles Francis Williams, Appellant

No. 06-15-00030-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 354th District Court of 

Hunt County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 30,023). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Charles Francis Williams, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 1, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### PACKER PONTIAC and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Petitioners, v. Howard THOMAS, Deceased, and Marion Thomas, Widow, et al., Respondents.

No. 40290.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 6, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 1, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, C. J., dissents.
#### John PAONE, Jr., a/k/a John A. Paone, Jr., Appellant, v. GUNTHER AND THOMAS PLAIN N-FANCY CORPORATION, a/k/a Gunther & Thomas Plain and Fancy Corporation, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 1958.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

April 25, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23996]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

    Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and 
Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651; 80 Stat. 
897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the question of whether 
instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the purposes for which 
the instruments shown below are intended to be used, are being 
manufactured in the United States.
    Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a) (3) and (4) of the 
regulations and be filed within 20 days with the Statutory Import 
Programs Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230. 
Applications may be examined between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 
4211, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, D.C.

    Docket Number: 97-073. Applicant: Research Foundation of The City 
University of New York, 79 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003. 
Instrument: Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectrometer, EMX Series. 
Manufacturer: Bruker Instruments, Germany. Intended Use: The instrument 
will be used for studies of Lithium-transition metal insertion 
compounds; prefluorinated polymers prepared by chemical or radiation 
crosslinking. Investigations will be conducted to determine the 
correlation between EPR spectroscopic parameters and electrical 
properties of the materials, the goal of which is to better understand 
the atomic/molecular level processes associated with electrical 
conductivity. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: August 
21, 1997.

    Docket Number: 97-074. Applicant: Case Western Reserve University, 
School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, 10900 Euclid Avenue, 
Cleveland, OH 44106. Instrument: Stopped-Flow Spectrometer, Model 
SX.18MV. Manufacturer: Applied Photophysics Ltd., United Kingdom. 
Intended Use: The instrument will be used to investigate the kinetics 
of the interaction between biological macromolecules and ligands in 
experiments conducted to: (1) Monitor the interaction between RNA 
polymerase and double stranded DNA, (2) monitor the interaction of 
cinnamoyl-CoA substrates with enoyl-CoA hydratase and (3) monitor the 
interaction of transcription factors with ribosomes. Application 
accepted by Commissioner of Customs: August 22, 1997.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-23996 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20-1225V

UNPUBLISHED

MICHAEL CALVIN MILLER,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: July 28, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Pneumococcal 

Conjugate Vaccine; Shoulder Injury 

Related to Vaccine Administration 

(SIRVA)

Dylan Wilbanks, Wilbanks Law Firm, P.C., Commerce, GA, for Petitioner.

Sarah Black Rifkin, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On September 18, 2020, Michael Calvin Miller filed a petition for compensation 

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2

(the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”), which meets the Table definition for a SIRVA injury, following 

the receipt of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on November 9, 2018. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 

2, 23-24. Petitioner further alleges that he received the vaccine in the United States, that 

he suffered the residual effects of his SIRVA more than six months post-vaccination, and 

that neither he nor any other person has filed a civil action or received compensation for 

his SIRVA. Petition at ¶¶ 2, 22, 25-27. The case was assigned to the Special Processing 

Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government

Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).

CORRECTED
2

On July 27, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.

Specifically, Respondent believes “that [P]etitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in 

the Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to interpretation (“QAI”) 

for SIRVA.” Id. at 8. Respondent further agrees that “based on the present record, 

[P]etitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2190 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2190

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 11-aminoundecanoic acid 
                              (monomer 11)

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 2006

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 11-aminoundecanoic acid 
                              (monomer 11)

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 11-AMINOUNDECANOIC ACID (MONOMER 11).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.49 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
FATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
UNITED ST/ pd ogni SIRVEY, WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1254 PLATE 7

EXPLANATION

200 parts per million

O

er
= . 20 parts per million
Area of circle is proportional to sum of anions
QQ and cations in parts per million
(js) Ju \
° \
\ onli ste
pre a Foot of mountain
° i ly "gun
27FL
Well number as referred to in text
Ju
§ For geologic explanation see pl. 5
~ 20%.
Xe | £
is) 3 &
& Ew
~ g
Ry
N
1S)
x

Ju

LAKE EARL, 6800 ppm; shown
here at 0.1 scale

‘SMITH RIVER
May 7, 1953

WS
CRESCENT CITY “Ss

MAP OF THE SMITH RIVER PLAIN AREA, SHOWING THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION
OF SELECTED WATERS, NORTHWESTERN DEL NORTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1 i} i Miles

ieee ae eT ee L 403764 © -56 (In pocket)
#### Arthur Lee MOORE v. Major I. C. McKENZIE.

No. 39164.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
# Eiropas Savienības C 140I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 140I |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 64. gadagājums2021. gada 21. aprīlis |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 140I

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

64. gadagājums2021. gada 21. aprīlis

---

| Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- |
| | Labojumi |
| | Labojums Eiropas Darba drošības un veselības aizsardzības aģentūras (EU-OSHA), Bilbao, sludinājumā par vakantu izpilddirektora amatu (pagaidu darbinieks – AD 14 pakāpe) – COM/2020/20049 ( OV C 171 A, 19.5.2020. ) | 1 |

Saturs

Lappuse

Labojumi

Labojums Eiropas Darba drošības un veselības aizsardzības aģentūras (EU-OSHA), Bilbao, sludinājumā par vakantu izpilddirektora amatu (pagaidu darbinieks – AD 14 pakāpe) – COM/2020/20049 ( OV C 171 A, 19.5.2020. )

EU-OSHA

( OV C 171 A, 19.5.2020. )

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

Labojumi

| 21.4.2021 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CI 140/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2021

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CI 140/1

---

Labojums Eiropas Darba drošības un veselības aizsardzības aģentūras (EU-OSHA), Bilbao, sludinājumā par vakantu izpilddirektora amatu (pagaidu darbinieks – AD 14 pakāpe) – COM/2020/20049

(
  “Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis” C 171 A, 2020. gada 19. maijs
  )

(2021/C 140 I/01)

4. lappusē sestajā rindkopā:

tekstu:

“Pirms valde ieceļ amatā vienu no atlasītajiem kandidātiem, pretendenti tiks lūgti ierasties Padomes kompetentajās struktūrās un Eiropas Parlamenta komitejā un atbildēt uz jautājumiem. Eiropas Parlaments un Eiropas Savienības Padome tad sniedz atzinumu un nosaka secību no piemērotākā uz mazāk piemērotu. Valde ieceļ izpilddirektoru, ņemot vērā šos atzinumus.”

lasīt šādi:

“Izvēlēto kandidātu uzaicina sniegt paziņojumu Eiropas Parlamentam un atbildēt uz Parlamenta deputātu jautājumiem.”

---
Exhibit 23.2




Deloitte & Touche (M.E.) Bin Ghanim Tower Hamdan Street




P.O.Box 990, Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates




Tel: +971 (2) 676 0606 Fax: +971 (2) 676 0644




www.deloitte.com









PRIVATE& CONFIDENTIAL




GSE Systems Inc.


1332 Londontown Blvd. Suite 200


Sykesville, MD 21784 United States of America




30 June 2010


Our ref: R/CU/RPA/AKM




Dear Sirs,




Emirates Simulation Academy LLC




We have previously audited, in accordance with International Standards on Auditing, the 31 December 2009 financial statements of Emirates Simulation Academy LLC (the "Company"). We have issued a report dated 19 May 2010 on those financial statements. In connection with your filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, USA, you have requested us to provide our consent to include the financial statements of Emirates Simulation Academy LLC including our audit report thereon.




We are pleased to provide our consent to GSE Systems Inc. to include the financial statements of Emirates Simulation Academy LLC including our audit report thereon with your filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, USA.




Please contact us if you need any further information or clarification.




We are pleased to be of service to you




Yours truly,




/s/ Deloitte & Touche
#### Mrs. H. A. BLACKWELL et al. v. Albert J. GLISSON.

No. 46104.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 1, 1971.

Satterfield, Shell, Williams & Buford, Jackson, for appellants.

O. B. Triplett, Jr., Forest, for appellee.

RODGERS, Justice.

Mrs. H. A. Blackwell and Mrs. J. W. Brasher brought suit against Albert J. Glisson, their brother, to cancel a deed as a cloud upon their title to certain lands formerly belonging to their parents, James L. and Mary C. Glisson. Suit was filed in the Chancery Court of Smith County, Mississippi. The appellants alleged that the deed from their parents to their brother, *32Albert J. Glisson, was obtained by ap-pellee by undue influence and without consideration. The appellee filed his answer denying that the complainants inherited any interest in the described lands and alleged in a cross-bill that he purchased the property from his parents for a valuable consideration. After an answer was filed to the cross-bill the case was heard upon oral and documentary evidence, and the chancellor entered a decree dismissing the original bill of complaint and sustained the prayer of the cross-bill and granted appellee a judgment cancelling the claim of the appellants as a cloud upon the title of appellee, Albert J. Glisson, to the lands described in the decree.

During the trial the complainants and another sister were offered as witnesses for the complainants. The appellee objected upon the ground that they were ineligible to testify to establish their claims against the estate of their deceased parents under prohibition of Section 1690, Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated (1956). The chancellor sustained this objection but permitted the complainants to perfect their record for appeal by introducing their testimony into the trial record. Upon entering his decree, however, the chancellor stated that he considered all the testimony, “including the testimony of complainants,” and concluded that he found no confidential relationship between Albert J. Glisson and his father and mother.

A careful reading of the record in this case leaves no room for doubt. The testimony is clear and convincing that the appellee, Albert J. Glisson, did not obtain the deed herein involved from his parents by undue influence.

It is, therefore, not necessary for us to determine whether or not the chancellor was in error in sustaining an objection to the testimony of the sisters of appellee since he considered this evidence in reaching his decision. We have also read this evidence, along with all the record, and we are convinced that the chancellor reached the proper disposition of this case. Bradley v. Howell, 161 Miss. 346, 134 So. 843 (1931).

Affirmed.

GILLESPIE, P. J., and JONES, BRADY and SMITH, JJ., concur.
# C_2010341EN.01003901.xml

| 16.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 341/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/39

---

List of natural mineral waters recognised by Iceland and Norway

(Annuls and replaces the text published in OJ C 28, 4.2.2010, p. 24, and EEA Supplement No 5, 4.2.2010, p. 1)

(Annuls and replaces the text published in OJ C 28, 4.2.2010, p. 24, and EEA Supplement No 5, 4.2.2010, p. 1)

2010/C 341/09

In accordance with Article 1 of Directive 2009/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the exploitation and marketing of natural mineral waters (1), as incorporated in point 54zzzzd of Chapter XII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement, a list of recognised natural mineral waters shall be published.

1

List of natural mineral waters recognised by Iceland

List of natural mineral waters recognised by Iceland

| Trade Name | Name of source | Place of exploitation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Icelandic Glacial | Ölfus Spring | Hlíðarendi, Ölfus, Selfoss |

Trade Name

Name of source

Place of exploitation

Icelandic Glacial

Ölfus Spring

Hlíðarendi, Ölfus, Selfoss

List of natural mineral waters recognised by Norway

List of natural mineral waters recognised by Norway

| Trade Name | Name of source | Place of exploitation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Best naturlig mineralvann | Kastbrekka | Kambrekka/Trondheim |
| Bonaqua Silver | Telemark kilden | Fyresdal |
| Farris | Kong Olavs kilde | Larvik |
| Fjellbekk | Ivar Aasen kilde | Volda |
| Isbre | Isbre kilden | Buhaugen, Osa, Ulvik |
| Isklar | Isklar kildene | Vikebygd i Ullensvang |
| Modal | Modal kilden | Fyresdal |
| Naturlig mineralvann fra Villmark kilden på Rustad Gård | Villmark kilden på Rustad gård | Rustad/Elverum |
| Olden | Blåfjell kilden | Olderdalen |
| Osa | Osa kilden | Ulvik/Hardanger |

Trade Name

Name of source

Place of exploitation

Best naturlig mineralvann

Kastbrekka

Kambrekka/Trondheim

Bonaqua Silver

Telemark kilden

Fyresdal

Farris

Kong Olavs kilde

Larvik

Fjellbekk

Ivar Aasen kilde

Volda

Isbre

Isbre kilden

Buhaugen, Osa, Ulvik

Isklar

Isklar kildene

Vikebygd i Ullensvang

Modal

Modal kilden

Fyresdal

Naturlig mineralvann fra Villmark kilden på Rustad Gård

Villmark kilden på Rustad gård

Rustad/Elverum

Olden

Blåfjell kilden

Olderdalen

Osa

Osa kilden

Ulvik/Hardanger

---

(1)  OJ L 164, 26.6.2009, p. 45.

1

---
#### ESTATE of Maude L. WOOD, Deceased.

No. 38995.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 226 So.2d 46.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,698
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,862
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,862
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,490
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,862
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,489
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,489)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.003)


</TABLE>