alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23396]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-703-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

August 28, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 22, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 
500 Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan 48243, filed in Docket No. 
CP97-703-000 a request pursuant to Secs. 157.205 and 157.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) under the Natural 
Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to construct and operate a bi-
directional interconnection between ANR and Mid Continent Market 
Center, Inc. (MCMC) in Kiowa County Kansas, for Part 284 transportation 
services by ANR, under ANR's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. 
CP82-480-000, pursuant to Section 7 of the NGA, all as more fully set 
forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open to 
public inspection.
    ANR proposes to construct and operate an 8-inch hot tap, an 8-inch 
insulating flange, and an electronic measurement system. It is stated 
that ANR will be fully reimbursed for the $102,000 cost of installing 
the facilities by MCMC. It is explained that the interconnection will 
give shippers on ANR access to MCMC's system. ANR states that the 
interconnection will accommodate deliveries of up to 40 Mmcf per day. 
It is asserted that the proposal will have no adverse impact on ANR's 
peak day or annual deliveries or on the annual entitlements of ANR's 
customers. It is explained that the proposal will not impact ANR's gas 
supply situation and that deliveries can be made without detriment or 
disadvantage to any existing customer.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Sec. 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the 
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23396 Filed 9-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERNEST CLARK HICKS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a foreign

(non

- Washington incorporated) banking

institution; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP OF

WASHINGTON, a Washington corporation;

DOES, 1

- 10,

Defendants. No. 20

- 36029

D.C. N o. 2:20

- cv

- 00158

- SAB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Stanley A. Bastian, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021 * *

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 36029

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Ernest Clark Hicks appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his

action alleging various federal and state law claims regarding a home loan

. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under

Fed eral Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) based on claim preclusion

. Mpoyo v.

Litton Electro

- Optical Sys. , 430 F.3d 985, 987 (9th Cir. 2005). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Hicks’s action on the basis of claim

preclusion because his claims were raised or could have been raised in previous

actions between the parties that resulted in final adjudications on the merits. Se e

id. at 987

- 88 (elements of federal claim preclusion ); Ensley v. Pitcher , 222 P.3d

99, 104 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009) (e lements of claim preclusion under Washington

law).

We reject as meritless Hicks’s contention that prior settlement agreements

reserved the right to litigate the claims at issue in this action.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly rais ed and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATE OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Manfred Gingl, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Tesma International Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

Dated:
May 17, 2004

| |  | /s/MANFRED GINGLManfred Gingl
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

11

---



QuickLinks
No. D-2205.

#### In re Disbarment of Fredenberger.

William Erwin Fredenberger, Jr., of Stafford, Va., having requested to resign as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to the practice of law before this Court. The rule to show cause, issued on October 30, 2000 *[ante,*p. 954], is discharged.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          23,598
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,598
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,701
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,170
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,598
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (5,708)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,708)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,708)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,708)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.003)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                      REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

To the Board of Directors
of Dade Behring Inc.

     Our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Dade Behring Inc.
referred to in our report dated March 25, 1998 (which report and consolidated
financial statements are listed in the "Index to Financial Statements and
Schedule" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K) also included an audit of the
Financial Statement Schedule listed in Item 14(a)(i) of this Form 10-K. In our
opinion, this Financial Statement Schedule presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the
related consolidated financial statements.


PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 25, 1998


                                      X-5
255 La. 809

#### Lillie Mae THOMAS et al. v. The GILLETTE COMPANY.

No. 50417.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 3, 1970.

In re: Lillie Mae Thomas and Burley Thomas applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 230 So.2d 870.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7348

GREGORY MAURICE LEE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District

Judge. (CA-97-316-3-MU)

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 28, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Maurice Lee, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* To the extent Appellant alleges due process violations regarding his administrative hearing and that he was improperly

denied parole, these claims also fail. See Sandin v. Connor, __ U.S. ___, 63 U.S.L.W. 4601, 4604-05 (U.S. June 19, 1995) (No. 93-

1911) (noting with approval the procedural due process principles

outlined in Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 557, 564-66 (1974));

Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Neb. Penal & Correctional Complex, 442

U.S. 1, 7 (1979) ("There is no constitutional or inherent right of

a convicted person to be conditionally released before the

expiration of a valid sentence.").

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court.* Lee v. Attorney General of North Carolina,

No. CA-97-316-3-MU (W.D.N.C. July 22, 1997). We deny Appellant's

motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-17-00442-CR

Gilberto Ozuna MORENO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR11608

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED June 27, 2018.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
DSpace Repository

# Precision orbits of 413 photographic meteors

Login

      -  DSpace Home 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions Series 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics 
      - →
      - View Item

# Precision orbits of 413 photographic meteors

Jacchia, Luigi G.Whipple, Fred L.

DOI:					https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810231.4-4.97

Date:					1961

### Citation:					

Precision orbits of 413 photographic meteors*Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics*https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810231.4-4.97

Show full item record

## Files in this item

Name:SCAS-0028.pdf

Size:1.175Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCAS-0028.epub

Size:11.57Mb

Format:application/epub+zip

View/Open

Name:SCAS-0028.mobi

Size:14.45Mb

Format:application/x-mobipocket-ebook

View/Open

## This item appears in the following Collection(s)

            -  Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics  [67]  

# Search DSpace

# Browse

              -  All of DSpace                  -  Communities & Collections 
                -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 
              -  This Collection                  -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 

# My Account

              -  Login 

Terms of UsePrivacyContact UsSend Feedback

DSpace softwareDuraSpace

Theme by
Order entered February 27, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01342
- CV KENNETH D. MURPHY, Appellant

V. ALFONSO FELIPE MEJIA ARCOS, Appellee On Appeal from t he 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 16
- 11187



### O RDER Before the Court is the February 25, 2019 request of Antionette Reagor, Official Court Reporter for the 68th Judicial Court, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and extend the time to March 11, 2019

.
/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
January 21, 2016

Administrator

Federal Aviation Administration

Re: Exemption No. (Status Pending)

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2016-0673

Dear Sir or Madam:

Please accept this as formal petition to amend Wired Technology Company LLC's (hereinafter petitioner 

or operator) pending Section 333 Exemption, listed under Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2016-0673, to add 

the following sUAS:

DJI Inspire 1

DJI Phantom 3

DJI Phantom 2

DJI S1000

3DR Solo

3DR X8-M

3DR IRIS

SensFly ebee

SensFly exom

PrecisionHawk HawkEye Lancaster

Trimble UX5

Swift Radioplane Lynx M

The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the DJI Inspire 1 in Exemption No. 11295 

(RoboFlight Systems LLC). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the DJI Phantom 2 in 

Exemption No. 11260 (First Flight Photography, LLC). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness 

of the DJI Phantom 3 in Exemption No. 12997 (New England Studio LLC). The FAA previously determined 

the airworthiness of the DJI S1000 in Exemption No. 11881 (Empire Unmanned LLC). The FAA previously 

determined the airworthiness of the 3DR Solo in Exemption No. 11832 (AUV, LLC). The FAA has 

previously determined the airworthiness of the 3DR X8-M in Exemption No. 12084 (Robert B. Dreer). 

The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the 3DR IRIS in Exemption No. 12368 (Dark 

Technologies, LLC). (The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the Sensfly ebee in Exemption 

No. 11263 (SensFly Ltd.). The FAA Previously determined the airworthiness of the SensFly exom in

Exemption No. 11263A (SensFly Ltd.) The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the 

PrecisionHawk HawkEye Lancaster in Exemption No. 11273 (AIG PC Global Services, Inc.). The FAA 

previously determined the airworthiness of the Trimble UX5 in Exemption No. 11110 (Trimble navigation 

LTD.). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the Swift Radioplane Lynx M in Exemption 

No. 11432A (Compass Data, Inc.).

All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of our currently pending 

FAA Section 333 Exemption, listed under Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2016-0673. Since the requested 

amendment to Wired Technology Company LLC’s pending exemption would not set any precedent or 

raise any novel issue, and because petitioner seeks to begin these operations with minimal delay, Wired 

Technology Company LLC respectfully requests the FAA to determine that good cause exists to grant the 
requested amendment expeditiously by summary means along with the initial exemption request listed

under Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2016-0673.

Based on the foregoing, Petitioner hereby requests that the FAA grant this petition and provide such 

further relief as deemed appropriate for the operations proposed herein.

Please let me know if you require additional information in support of this petition.

Sincerely,

Stuart D. Finlay

Stuart Finlay

Wired Technology Company LLC

Attn: Stuart Finlay

771 Inman Mews Drive NE

Atlanta, GA 30307

stuart@wiredtechco.com
#### FRAZIER v. GUNTER.

No. 38952.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
DSpace Repository

# Traditional Pottery Techniques of Pakistan: Field and Laboratory Studies

Login

      -  DSpace Home 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions Series 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology 
      - →
      - View Item

# Traditional Pottery Techniques of Pakistan: Field and Laboratory Studies

Rye, Owen S.Evans, Clifford

DOI:					https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.21.1

Date:					1976

### Abstract:					

### Citation:					

*Traditional Pottery Techniques of Pakistan: Field and Laboratory Studies**Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology*https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.21.1

Show full item record

## Files in this item

Name:SCtA-0021-Hi_res.pdf

Size:131.1Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0021-Lo_res.pdf

Size:19.37Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0021.epub

Size:75.52Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:ePub

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0021.mobi

Size:91.15Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:mobi

View/Open

## This item appears in the following Collection(s)

            -  Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology  [60]  

# Search DSpace

# Browse

              -  All of DSpace                  -  Communities & Collections 
                -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 
              -  This Collection                  -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 

# My Account

              -  Login 

Terms of UsePrivacyContact UsSend Feedback

DSpace softwareDuraSpace

Theme by
|                                       |   | Years ended December 31, |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                       |   | 2010                                    |   |   | 2009 |   |   | 2008 |   |
|                                       |   |                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net loss                                   |   | $                                       | (4,609 | ) |   | $ | (11,531 | ) |   | $ | (17,046 | ) |
|                                       |   |                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted average common shares outstanding |   |                                    | 22,162 |   |   |   | 19,938 |   |   |   | 17,260 |   |
|                                       |   |                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Basic loss per common share                |   | $                                       | (0.21  | ) |   | $ | (0.58 | ) |   | $ | (0.99 | ) |

|                                       |   | Years ended December 31, |    |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|---------|
|                                       |   | 2010                                    |    |   | 2009 |   |   | 2008 |   |
|                                       |   |                                    |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net loss                                   |   | $                                       | (4,609  | ) |   | $ | (11,531 | ) |   | $ | (17,046 | ) |
|                                       |   |                                    |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted average common shares outstanding |   |                                    | 22,162  |   |   |   | 19,938 |   |   |   | 17,260 |   |
|                                       |   |                                    |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Dilutive securities (1)(2)(3)              |   |                                    | — |   |   |   | — |   |   |   | — |   |
|                                       |   |                                    |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Diluted average common shares outstanding  |   |                                    | 22,162  |   |   |   | 19,938 |   |   |   | 17,260 |   |
|                                       |   |                                    |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Diluted loss per common share (1)(2)(3)    |   | $                                       | (0.21   | ) |   | $ | (0.58 | ) |   | $ | (0.99 | ) |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2873 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2873

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to recognize the Women-Owned 
     Small Business program in the Department of Veterans Affairs 
  procurement hierarchy of small business preferences, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2023

 Mr. Peters (for himself and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to recognize the Women-Owned 
     Small Business program in the Department of Veterans Affairs 
  procurement hierarchy of small business preferences, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Affairs Opportunity for 
Women-Owned Small Businesses Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. RECOGNITION OF WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM IN DEPARTMENT 
              OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PROCUREMENT HIERARCHY OF SMALL 
              BUSINESS PREFERENCES.

    Section 8127(h) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``; or'' and 
                inserting a semicolon; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; or'';
                    (C) by adding at the end the following new 
                subparagraph:
            ``(C) section 8(m) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
        637(m)).''; and
                    (D) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (C) 
                as clauses (i) through (iii), respectively;
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as 
        subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively;
            (3) in the matter before subparagraph (A), as redesignated 
        by paragraph (2), by inserting ``(1)'' before ``Preferences 
        for''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following new paragraph (2):
    ``(2) All preferences described in subparagraph (C) of paragraph 
(1) shall be afforded the same degree of priority under such 
paragraph.''.
                                 <all>
```