alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24618]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4514-000]


Tucson Electric Power Company; Notice of Filing

September 11, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 5, 1997, on Electric Power Company 
(TEP) filed its proposed Market Rate Tariff. The proposed tariff would 
allow TEP to sell capacity and energy to eligible customers at market-
based rates.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions and protests should be filed on or before September 22, 1997 
and must be served on TEP. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any persons 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24618 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Solarradio bursts of spectral types II and IV: their relations to optical phenomenaand to geomagnetic activity**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:5/15
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001079194
 
September 5, 2018
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 48729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24790]



[[Page 48727]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part III





The President





_______________________________________________________________________



Presidential Determination No. 97-32--Extension of the Exercise of 
Certain Authorities Under the Trading With the Enemy Act


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register-/-Vol. 62, No. 179-/-Tuesday, September 16, 1997-/-
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 48729]]

                Presidential Determination No. 97-32 of September 12, 
                1997

                
Extension of the Exercise of Certain Authorities 
                Under the Trading With the Enemy Act

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the 
                Secretary of the
                Treasury

                Under section 101(b) of Public Law 95-223 (91 Stat. 
                1625; 50 U.S.C. App. 5(b) note), and a previous 
                determination made by me on August 27, 1996 (61 Fed. 
                Reg. 46529), the exercise of certain authorities under 
                the Trading With the Enemy Act is scheduled to 
                terminate on September 14, 1997.

                I hereby determine that the extension for 1 year of the 
                exercise of those authorities with respect to the 
                applicable countries is in the national interest of the 
                United States.

                Therefore, pursuant to the authority vested in me by 
                section 101(b) of Public Law 95-223, I extend for 1 
                year, until September 14, 1998, the exercise of those 
                authorities with respect to countries affected by:

                    (1) the Foreign Assets Control Regulations, 31 CFR 
                Part 500;
                    (2) the Transaction Control Regulations, 31 CFR 
                Part 505; and
                    (3) the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 CFR 
                Part 515.

                The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and 
                directed to publish this determination in the Federal 
                Register.

                    (Presidential Sig.)<Clinton1><Clinton2>

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, September 12, 1997.

[FR Doc. 97-24790
Filed 9-15-97; 9:27 am]
Billing code 4810-31-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 49649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25233]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 86

[FRL-5897-5]


Control of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles and New Motor 
Vehicle Engines; Voluntary Standards for Light-Duty Vehicles; Extension 
of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is extending the 
comment period on the Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
(SNPRM) which takes comment on the few remaining issues necessary to 
finalize the regulations for the National LEV program, and which 
appeared in the Federal Register on August 22, 1997 (62 FR 44754). The 
public comment period was to end on September 22, 1997. The purpose of 
this document is to extend the comment period an additional 7 days 
beyond that, to end on September 29, 1997. This extension of the 
comment period is provided to allow commenters additional time to 
respond to the SNPRM.

DATES: EPA will accept public comments on the Supplemental Notice of 
Proposed Rulemaking until September 29, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted (in duplicate if 
possible) to: the EPA, Air Docket, Room M-1500 (Mail Code 6102), 
Waterside Mall, Attn: Docket A-95-26, 401 M Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20460. Materials relevant to this rulemaking are contained in Docket 
No. A-95-26. The docket is located at The Air Docket, 401 M Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20460, and may be viewed in room M-1500 between 
8:00 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. The telephone number is 
(202) 260-7548 and the facsimile number is (202) 260-4400. A reasonable 
fee may be charged by EPA for copying docket material.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Simon, Office of Mobile Sources, 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street SW, Washington, DC 
20460. Telephone (202) 260-3623; Fax (202) 260-6011; e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e2918b8f8d8ccc8983908ea28792838f838b8ecc879283cc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1063797d7f7e3e7b71627c507560717d71797c3e7560713e777f66">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 17, 1997.
Richard D. Wilson,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 97-25233 Filed 9-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6589

WILLIAM CHARLES COOK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RAYMOND SMITH; WICK SOUTHERN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-96-259-5-BO)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 2, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Charles Cook, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Cook v. Smith, No. CA-96-259-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 1996).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 187 (Friday, September 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50653-50654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25512]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public that a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Procedures 
Advisory Committee

[[Page 50654]]

(ATPAC) will be held to review present air traffic control procedures 
and practices for standardization, clarification, and upgrading of 
terminology and procedures.

DATES: The meeting will be held from October 6-9, 1997, from 9 a.m. to 
5 p.m. each day.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Federal Aviation Administration 
Headquarters, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Charles R. Reavis, Executive 
Director, ATPAC, Strategic Operations/Procedures Division, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, telephone (202) 267-
3725.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App.2), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the ATPAC to be held October 6 through 9, 
1997, at the Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, 
SW., Washington, DC 20591.
    The agenda for this meeting will cover: a continuation of the 
Committee's review of present air traffic control procedures and 
practices for standardization, clarification, and upgrading of 
terminology and procedures. It will also include:
    1. Approval of Minutes.
    2. Submission and Discussion of Areas of Concern.
    3. Discussion of Potential Safety Items.
    4. Report from Executive Director.
    5. Items of Interest.
    6. Discussion and agreement of location and dates for subsequent 
meetings.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to the 
space available. With the approval of the Chairperson, members of the 
public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons desiring to 
attend and persons desiring to present oral statements should notify 
the person listed above not later than October 3, 1997. The next 
quarterly meeting of the FAA ATPAC is planned to be held from January 
12-15, 1998, location TBD.
    Any member of the public may present a written statement to the 
Committee at any time at the address given above.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 18, 1997.
Charles R. Reavis,
Executive Director, Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 97-25512 Filed 9-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THOMAS M. BOLICK, and : No. 4:14-CV-0409

EILEEN B. BOLICK, :

:

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. : (Judge Brann)

:

NORTHEAST INDUSTRIAL :

SERVICES CORPORATION, et al., :

: ( Magistrate Judge Mehalchick) 

:

Defendants. :

ORDER

February 10, 2015

The undersigned has given full and independent consideration to the January

14, 2015 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick

(ECF No. 72). The Plaintiffs filed objections (ECF No. 73), which the Court

considered under the applicable standard.

 Because this Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Mehalchick’s analysis and

conclusion, the Court will not rehash the sound reasoning of the Magistrate Judge

and will adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. United States Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick’s Report and

Recommendation (ECF No. 72) is adopted in its entirety.

1

Case 4:14-cv-00409-MWB Document 74 Filed 02/10/15 Page 1 of 3
2. All of the Defendants’ various motions to dismiss are GRANTED

(ECF Nos. 16, 18, 23, 37, 39, 52, 59).

3. All claims against Judge Charles H. Saylor are DISMISSED due to

absolute judicial immunity.

4. Counts I and VI against Northeast Industrial Services Corporation;

William R. Williams; Jeff Kurtz; Mount Carmel Borough; Edward T.

Cuff; and Northumberland County are DISMISSED without prejudice

as premature.

5. Count II against Mount Carmel Borough and Northumberland County

are DISMISSED without prejudice as premature to the extent it seeks

to impose vicarious liability based upon the eminent domain

proceedings at issue in Count I.

6. Count II against Northumberland County is DISMISSED for failure to

state a claim to the extent it seeks to impose vicarious liability based

upon the credit card dispute at issue in Count III;

7. Counts III and VI against DFS Services LLC f/k/a Discover Financial

Services; Discover Bank of Delaware; Daniel McKenna; Ballard

Spahr LLP f/k/a Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll LLP; and

Northumberland County are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim.

2

Case 4:14-cv-00409-MWB Document 74 Filed 02/10/15 Page 2 of 3
8. Counts VII and IX against all Defendants are DISMISSED for failure

to state a claim. 

9. Count VIII against Daniel McKenna; Ballard Spahr LLP f/k/a Ballard 

Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll LLP; and Northumberland County are 

DISMISSED for failure to state a claim.

10. Counts IV and V against all Defendants and Count X against the 

News Item and Scranton Times LP are DISMISSED without 

prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3).

11. The Plaintiffs are granted leave to file a second amended complaint 

on or before twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order.

12. The matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Mehalchick for further 

proceedings.

BY THE COURT:

s/Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

3

Case 4:14-cv-00409-MWB Document 74 Filed 02/10/15 Page 3 of 3
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:**

_____ 2013

_____ - NM -

____ 165

______ - AD **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significan t? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2845 

To prohibit recipients of disaster recovery relief assistance from the Department of Housing and Urban Development from penalizing applicants 

that declined assistance from the Small Business Administration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2023 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 

Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit recipients of disaster recovery relief assistance 

from the Department of Housing and Urban Development from penalizing applicants that declined assistance 

from the Small Business Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disaster Assistance 

5 Simplification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DUPLICATION OF BENEFITS FOR DISASTER RELIEF. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2845 IS

1 (1) the term ‘‘Administration’’ means the Small 

2 Business Administration; and 

3 (2) the term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary 

4 of Housing and Urban Development. 

5 (b) PROHIBITIONS.—With respect to a grant pro6 vided to a grantee under title I of the Housing and Com7 munity Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.) 

8 related to a major disaster declared by the President 

9 under section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Re10 lief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170), the 

11 Secretary and the grantee shall not— 

12 (1) take into consideration whether an appli13 cant for assistance from the grantee applied and was 

14 approved for, but declined, assistance related to the 

15 major disaster from the Administration under sec16 tion 7(b) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

17 636(b)); or 

18 (2) reduce the amount provided to an applicant 

19 described in paragraph (1) by any amount that the 

20 applicant would have received from the Administra21 tion if the applicant had not declined the assistance. 

22 (c) APPLICATION.—Subsection (b) shall apply with 

23 respect to applicants for assistance from a grantee under 

24 title I of the Housing and Community Development Act 

25 of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.) with respect to a major 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 2845 IS

1 disaster declared by the President under section 401 of 

2 the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency As3 sistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170) who applied for assistance 

4 from the Administration under section 7(b) of the Small 

5 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)) related to the major dis6 aster before, on, or after the date of enactment of this 

7 Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

MATTHEW POWELL

NO. 2021 KW 1594

MARCH 14, 2022

In Re: Matthew Powell, applying for supervisory writs, 21st

Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, No. 19- 

01661. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED. The district court is ordered to act on

relator' s " Motion to Amend Sentence to Receive Concurrent

Imposition" filed May 27, 2021, if it has not already done so. 

JMG

GH

WRC

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

AwUft CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23272]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-157-007]

Gas Transport, Inc.; Notice of Compliance Filing

August 27, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 25, 1997, Gas Transport, Inc. (GTI) 
tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets:

Effective November 1, 1997

Sub. Fourth Revised Sheet No. 162
Sub. Third Revised Sheet No. 162A

    GTI states that these tariff sheets are being filed to comply with 
the letter order issued by the Commission on August 19, 1997.
    GTI states that copies of this filing were served upon its 
jurisdictional customers and the Regulatory Commissions of the states 
of Ohio and West Virginia.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C., 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such 
protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23272 Filed 9-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 CERTIFICATION OF SOLE REMAINING OFFICER-DIRECTOR
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of GYK Ventures, Inc. , a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-QSB for March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dan Sifford, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  Dated: May 14, 2004
  /s/J. Dan Sifford
 J. Dan Sifford
secretary/director
#### Vernal ROLLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-838.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 28, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliott H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

*492Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and HEN-DRY and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury of burglary. This appeal is from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered by the Circuit Court in and for Dade County, Florida.

Appellant urges reversal on the ground that the trial court erred in excluding two defense alibi witnesses whose names had not been provided to the state prior to trial.

The ground relied on by appellant for reversal has been carefully considered in the light of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and has been found to be without merit. Therefore, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

Affirmed.