alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The OHIO CASUALTY GROUP, Appellant, v. James C. PARRISH, Jr., a minor by and through his father and next friend, James C. Parrish, Sr., and James C. Parrish, Sr., Individually, et al., Appellees.

Nos. 75-1799 and 75-1800.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 2, 1978.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, Miami, Jones, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Headley & Sudduth, Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

WHEREAS, the judgment of this court was entered on November 2,1976 (338 So.2d 910) affirming the order of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida in the above styled cause, and

WHEREAS, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed September 29,1977, 350 So.2d 466 and mandate now lodged in this court quashed a portion of this court’s judgment,

NOW, THEREFORE, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause on November 18, 1976 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed November 2, 1976 insofar as it is in conflict with or fails to conform to the views expressed in the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida foresaid is withdrawn and vacated, and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the Circuit Court (Rule 3.16(b), Florida Appellate Rules).
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
Data Series 765
Coastal       Topography�Northeast Atlantic Coast, Post-Hurricane Sandy,       2012
Collaborators

Funding for this project was provided by       the U.S. Geological Survey - Coastal       and Marine Geology Program and the National Park Service Cape Hatteras and       Cape Lookout National Seashores.

U.S. Geological Survey

Coastal and             Marine Geology Program

St. Petersburg Coastal and             Marine Science Center

National Assessment of Coastal Change           Hazards

National Park             Service

Cape             Hatteras National Seashore

Cape             Lookout National Seashore

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/765/pubs765/html/collaborators.htmlPage Contact Information: GS Pubs Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thursday, May 16, 2013, 11:41:41 AM
<Page>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.6


                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                         MEDICAL STAFFING NETWORK, INC.
                    AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

                  This First Amendment (the "Amendment") to the Employment
Agreement, dated as of August 20, 2001, among Medical Staffing Network, Inc.
(the "Company"), MSN Holdings, Inc. ("Holdings") and Kevin S. Little (the
"Executive") (the "Employment Agreement"), is entered into as of October 26,
2001.

                  WHEREAS, the Company, Holdings and the Executive are presently
parties to the Employment Agreement; and

                  WHEREAS, in consideration of the performance of future
services by the Executive, the Company, Holdings and the Executive desire to
amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein.

                  NOW, THEREFORE, the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as
follows:

         1. Section 6(g) is amended by adding new subsection (iv) to the end
thereof to read as follows:

                  (iv) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in no
                  event shall the transactions contemplated by the Merger
                  Agreement constitute a Change in Control hereunder.

         2. Except as provided herein and to the extent necessary to give full
effect to the provisions of this Amendment, the terms of the Employment
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

                      [Signatures appear on following page]



<Page>



                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this
Amendment effective as of the date first written above.

                                 MEDICAL STAFFING NETWORK, INC.



                                 By:       /s/ Robert Adamson
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                          Name:  Robert Adamson
                                          Title:    Chief Executive Officer

                                 MSN HOLDINGS, INC.



                                 By:       /s/ Robert Adamson
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                          Name:  Robert Adamson
                                          Title:    Chief Executive Officer

                                 EXECUTIVE

                                  /s/ Kevin S. Little
                                 ---------------------------------------------
                                 Kevin S. Little
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2829 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2829

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 
 for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student 
                loan repayment or forgiveness programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2023

 Ms. Stabenow (for herself, Mr. Crapo, Mr. King, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Ms. 
 Smith, Ms. Murkowski, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Moran, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. 
   Boozman, Mrs. Feinstein, Ms. Collins, Mrs. Murray, and Mr. Risch) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 
 for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student 
                loan repayment or forgiveness programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Veterinary Workforce Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR ASSISTANCE PROVIDED TO PARTICIPANTS IN CERTAIN 
              VETERINARY STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENT OR FORGIVENESS 
              PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of section 108(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' after ``such Act,'',
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``, 
        under section 1415A of the National Agricultural Research, 
        Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3151a), or 
        under any other State loan repayment or loan forgiveness 
        program that is intended to provide for increased access to 
        veterinary services in such State.'', and
            (3) by striking ``state'' in the heading and inserting 
        ``other''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received by an individual in taxable years beginning 
after December 31, 2023.
                                 <all>
```
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2012-0528

Docket Number

2011-SW-068-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Alert Service Bulletin MBB-BK117 C-2-24A-010 

Revision 2, dated September 14, 2011

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3
 
                        CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 Nos. 33-92594, 33-92596, 33-92598, 33-92600, 33-92602, 33-92604,
33-92606, 33-92610, 33-92612, 33-92614, 33-92616, 33-92618, 33-92620, 33-92626,
33-92628, 33-92630, 33-92674 and 33-93178 of U.S. Industries, Inc. of our report
dated February 21, 1995 with respect to the combined financial statements and
schedule of the U.S. Industries, Inc. Automotive Group Companies (not presented
separately therein) appearing in U.S. Industries, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended September 28, 1996.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
November 20, 1996
EXHIBIT 32.1


                     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                CET SERVICES, INC.
                        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on
Form 10 KSB of CET Services, Inc. for the period ending December 31, 2006:

     (1)     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of CET
Services, Inc.






/s/ Steven H. Davis
Steven H. Davis
Chief Executive Officer
March 9, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to CET Services, Inc. and will
be retained by CET Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1  Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


     REPORT ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE AND CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Avant! Corporation:

The audits referred to in our report dated January 20, 1998, included the
related consolidated financial statement schedule as of December 31, 1997,
and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997,
included in the annual report on Form 10-K.  This consolidated financial
statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this consolidated financial
statement schedule based on our audits.  In our opinion, such consolidated
financial schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-18445 and 333-43087 ) on Form S-3,  in the registration statement (No.
333-42923) on Form S-4 and in the registration statements (Nos. 333-16981,
333-16303, 333-15159, 333-06405, 333-77196 and 333-77242) on Form S-8 of
Avant! Corporation of our report dated January 20, 1998, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Avant! Corporation as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1997, and the related consolidated financial statement schedule,
which reports appear in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of
Avant! Corporation.

                                               /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Mountain View, California
March 27, 1998




                                     32
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March
25, 2006 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods referred to in the Form 10-Q.
 /s/ John T. CahillJohn T. CahillChief Executive OfficerApril 28, 2006
### Ground-water resources of the Willamette Valley, Oregon

By: Arthur M. Piper

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp890

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification of CEO and CFO
Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Video Network
Communications, Inc. (the Company) for the annual period ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), Carl Muscari, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Lawrence Kinsella, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



| | /s/ Carl Muscari
Name: Carl Muscari
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: April 11, 2003
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/ Lawrence Kinsella
Name: Lawrence Kinsella
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 11, 2003
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Larry Gene TURNER, a minor, by and through his mother and next of kin, Louise Gibbs, and Louise Gibbs, Appellants, v. J. A. LONG, Appellee.

No. L-196.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Aug. 5, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 28, 1969.

*435Leonard E. Ireland, Jr., of Clayton, Duncan, Johnston, Clayton & Quincey, Gaines-ville, for appellants.

Angus W. Harriett, Palatka, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants have appealed an adverse final judgment in a medical malpractice case based upon a jury verdict in favor of appellee.

Appellants’ first point challenges the correctness of the trial court’s ruling which permitted appellee to amend his answer after the evidence was closed by interposing the defense of contributory negligence pursuant to the provisions of Rule 1.190(b), R.C.P., 30 F.S.A. Our Supreme Court has been extremely liberal. in permitting amendments after trial to conform to the evidence when the issue has been tried by the express or implied consent of the parties.1

Appellants’ second point on appeal challenges the trial court’s order denying their motion for new trial which is predicated upon the contention that the jury was confused and prejudiced by the inflammatory and unjustifiable remarks made by ap-pellee’s counsel in his summation to the jury. Again in this field of the law our Supreme Court has experienced difficulty in detecting any language by counsel in their summation which would warrant a new trial. A wide latitude has been accorded competing advocates in this phase of the trial.2

The able trial judge considered the grounds of both of appellants’ points on appeal in connection with their motion for new trial, and in the exercise of the discretion vested in him concluded that no valid grounds existed which required a re-litigation of the cause. Such discretion will not be disturbed absent a clear showing of abuse.3 The judgment appealed is affirmed.

CAROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON, and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

1

. Garrett v. Oak Hall Club (Fla.App.1959) 112 So.2d 603, decision quashed (Fla. 1960) 118 So.2d 633.

2

. Apalachicola Northern Bailroad Company v. Tyus, (Fla.App.1959) 114 So.2d 33, decision quashed (Fla.1961) 130 So. 2d 580 (see dissenting opinion pp. 588-596, inch).

3

. Cloud v. Fallis, (Fla.1959) 110 So.2d 669.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.12

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                             CAPITAL ONE CAPITAL IV


     THIS Certificate of Trust of Capital One Capital IV (the "Trust"), dated as
of January 23, 2002, is being duly executed and filed on behalf of the Trust by
the undersigned, as trustees, to form a business trust under the Delaware
Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. (S)3801 et seq.) (the "Act").
                       -------         -- ---


     1.   Name. The name of the business trust formed by this Certificate of
          ----
Trust is Capital One Capital IV.


     2.   Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the
          ----------------
Trust in the State of Delaware are The Bank of New York (Delaware), 700 White
Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware 19711.


     3.   Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
          --------------
filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.




                            [Signature pages follow]

<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Certificate of
Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.


                               THE BANK OF NEW YORK,
                               not in its individual capacity, but solely as
                               Property Trustee


                               By: /s/ Geovanni Barris
                                   ----------------------------
                                   Name:  Geovanni Barris
                                   Title: Vice President


                               THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE),
                               not in its individual capacity, but solely as
                               Delaware Trustee


                               By: /s/ William T. Lewis
                                   ----------------------------
                                   Name:  William T. Lewis
                                   Title: SVP

                                       2
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




The
      Board of Directors


GSE
      Systems, Inc.




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements No.
333-138702 and No. 333-150249 on Form S-8 and registration statements No.
333-147537, No. 333-144623, No. 333-143199, No. 333-134569  and No.
333-126472 on Form S-3 of GSE Systems, Inc. of our reports dated March 16,
2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of GSE Systems, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2008,  and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of GSE Systems,
Inc.





As
discussed in Note 10, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, on
January 1, 2007.




/s/ KPMG
LLP




Baltimore,
Maryland


June 30,
2009
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of RPM Advantage.
(the "Registrant") for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David R. Pressler, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:   July 15, 2011


By:

/s/ DAVID R. PRESSLER


David R. Pressler
Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
Regulatory Technical References 

E.H. Pechan, “Control Measure Development Support Analysis for the Ozone Transport 

Commission Model Rules”, March 31, 2001. 

OTC 2006. Identification and Evaluation of Candidate Control Measures: Draft 

Technical Support Document. Prepared by MACTEC Federal Programs, Inc., Herndon, 

Virginia for the Ozone Transport Commission. August 4, 2006
#### E. M. WHITTENTON, INC. v. NEIGHBORS.

No. 38339.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certiorari Denied March 2, 1970. See 90 S.Ct. 998.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Susan Lind HYERS a/k/a Susan Matney, Appellee.

No. M-79.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 9, 1970.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1970.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Joseph A. St. Ana, Jacksonville, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida has appealed a final judgment dismissing the information filed against appellee herein and discharging her from custody because of the State’s failure or refusal to divulge the name of its confidential informant whose information was used in part as a basis for procuring a search warrant. The judgment is reversed upon the authority of the decision of this court in the companion case of State of Florida v. James Eugene Matney, Leo Schuty a/k/a Leo Dean Welsh, and Susan Lind Hyers a/k/a Susan F. Matney, Case No. M-82, opinion filed this date, 236 So.2d 166.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.