### Russell M. Squire, Sly Dog Production, PLLC, Bozeman, MT

– Section 333 Exemption Petition

June 11, 2015

Russell M. Squire 1087 Stoneridge, Suite 2

- A Bozeman, MT 59718

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590



## Re: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. Part 21; 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b) (2); 91.103(b); 91.109; 119.121; 91.151(a); 91.203 (a) & (b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409(a) (2) and 91.417 (a) & (b).

Dear U.S. Department of Transportation,

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, I, Russell M. Squire, owner and operator of a small Unmanned Aircraft System equipped
to conduct aerial videos and photos of real estate listings, hereby apply for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations to allow commercial operation of my small Unmanned Aircraft System , so long as such operation is conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required in Section 333.

My name is Russell M. Squire and I am the owner of Sly Dog Production, PLLC, a State of Montana regist ered professional limited liability company which services the real estate industry in Montana, experienced in flying hobby quad

- copters for recreational purposes. I have also completed 35 hours of private pilot training through Sunbird aviation located at Gallatin Field in Belgrade, Montana. I, Russell M. Squire, have filmed with ESPN, OLN (Out Door Life Network), Dick Barrymore Productions; I have further shot still photos with Esquire and Men’s Journal.

I have a DJI Phantom 3 Professional quad copter wi th the intention of creating aerial cinematography to assist individuals and companies unfamiliar with the geographic layout of Bozeman, Montana and Gallatin County, Montana and to help improve real estate listing presentations for agents following exempti on and approval by the FAA. This will serve to augment the academic research experience for
the Bozeman area. I further intend to add a second DJI Phantom 3 Professional quad

- copter 1 to our company’s inventory in the future with identical safety features a nd capabilities.

I have flown small ultra

- light unmanned aerial systems for four years that are piloted by remote control without incident. Recent technological developments by DJI Company now make these devices safer
than ever before as well as more stab le and easier to fly. I am committed to safety with each flight and

### Russell M. Squire, Sly Dog Production, PLLC, Bozeman, MT

– Section 333 Exemption Petition

use a strict pre

- flight checklist and protocol. My, Russell M. Squire’s, exemption request would permit the operation of ultra

- light weight, unmanned (piloted by remote control) vehicle in tightly controlled and limited airspace 2 . These areas would be predetermined and away from the general public, airports, heliports and vehicular, as well as pedest rian, traffic for community videos and inside property boundaries for individual homeowner real estate listing videos and photos.

I, Russell M. Sq uire, have personally created safety protocols and pre

- flight checklist plan to be used in all flights whether for recreational or commercial purposes as the same pro cedures should apply to all UAS. These procedures are intended to avoid and prevent public hazard, as well as unmanned aircraft hazards. This will act to further enhance safety protocols 3 exclu sive to lightweight UAS’s specific to real estate video and photography. Our DJI Phantom 3 Professional quad

- copter further records all flight data and other information obtained through permitted flight operations to share with the FAA through any require d FAA reporting to assist with future protocol and safety regulations.

1

– Appendix A

– DJI Phantom 3 Professional quad

- copter Operator Manual

2

– Appendix B

- Bozeman, Montana 5 mile airport radius maps

3

– Appendix C

– Personal Protocols and Controls

### Russell M. Squire, Sly Dog Production, PLLC, Bozeman, MT

– Section 333 Exemption Petition

Granting my, Russell M. Squire’s, request comports with the Secretary of Transportation’s (FAA Administrators) responsibilities and authority to not only integrate UAS’s into the national airspace system, but to “... establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems [UAS’s] in the national airspace system” under Section 333 (c) of the Reform Act specific to the use of UAS’s for residential commercial photography, video productions and use by real estate professionals.
Furthermore , I, Russell M. Squire, will conduct my operations in compliance with the protocols
described herein or as otherwise mandated by the FAA.

For the reason s stated below I, Russell M. Squire , respectfully request the grant of an exemption allowing me to operate ultra light weight, remote controlled UAS’s for academic community awareness to benefit/stimulate attraction to the Bozeman, Montana and Gallatin County areas and to enhance real estate listing videos for homeowners who cannot afford expensive manned aircraft for the same

purpose. These activities will promote local economic growth through increased e mployment and
increased tax base. Both with public safety in mind by keeping heavier manned aircraft containing combustible fuel that poses potential public hazard. If I can provide any additional information to assist your understanding or review of this document, please do not hesitate to contact me at 406

- 425

- 2742
or via email at rustysquire7@gmail.com

.

I. Contact Information:

Russell M. Squire Sly Dog Production, PLLC 1087 Stoneridge, Suite 2

- A Bozeman, MT 59718 Mobile: (406) 425

- 2742
Email: rustysquire7@gmail.com

II. The Specific Sections of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations From Which Russell M. Squire Requests Exemption is : 14 CFR 21; 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b);

14 C.F.R. 91, et seq.; 14 CFR 407 (a) (1); 14 CFR 409 (a) (2); and, 14 CFR 417 (a) & (b).

### Russell M. Squire, Sly Dog Production, PLLC, Bozeman, MT

– Section 333 Exemption Petition

III. The Extent of relief Russell M. Squire seeks and the Reason s For Seeking The Relied :

I, Russell M. Squire , submit this application in accordance with the Reform Act, 112 P.L. 95 §§ 331

- 334, seeking relief from any currently applicable FARs operating to prevent me, Russell M. Squire

, contemplated commercial cinematic, academic and other flight operations within the national airspace system. The Reform Act in Section 332 provides for such integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into our national airspace system as it is in the public’s inter est to do so. My, Russell M. Squ ire’s , ultra light weight UAS meets the definition of “small unmanned aircraft” as defined in Section 331 and therefore the integration of my ultra light weight UAS is expressly contemplated by the Reform Act. I would like to operate my ultra light weight UAS prior to the time period by which the Reform Act requires the FAA to promulgate rules governing such craft. Thereby, providing direct experience and valuable information for formal regulation that can be administered uniformly to all real estate relate d
UAS aerial video and photography. The Reform Act guides the Secretary in determining the types of
UAS's that may operate safely in our national airspace system. Considerations include: The weight, size, speed and over all capabilities of the UAS's ; whethe r the UAS will be operated near airports or heavily populated areas; and, w hether the UAS will be operated by line of sight. 112 P.L. 95 § 333 (a). Each of
these items reflects in favor of an exem ption for me, Russell M. Squire . My UAS utilizes four (4) co unter

rotating propellers for balance, control and stability and has integrated GPS sensors with ground sensors to further safety considerations . My UAS is equipped with GPS and auto return to home safety

tec hnology. Weighing less than four (4 ) pounds (far below the maximum 55 pound limit); with all equipment attached

.

I, Russell M. Squire, consider safety as a foremost concern with each flight. My small unmanned aircraft is designed to hover in place via GPS and op erate in less than a 24 knot (27.61 mph) wind. For safety, stability and fear of financial loss I will not fly in winds exceeding 15 knots (17.26 mph). Built in safety systems include a GPS mode that allows my UAS to hover in place when radio controls are
released. With three modes to choose from , I utilize the Fail Safe Mode 4 for aerial video and photography

. We further set th e UAS’s altitude governance at 2 00 feet meaning that it cannot exceed this altitude above ground level (AGL). This is the safest, most reliable and stable mode to prevent

ac cident and hazard. When pilot communication is lost UAS is designed slowly descend to point of take
off using an automated return to home feature . I do not operate my UAS near airports, Hospitals nor Police heliports, and do not operate near areas where ge neral public is within fifty to one hundred (50

- 100) yards depending on location, conditions and weather. I am constantly on alert for any manned aircraft (Police/Medical helicopters, etc.) and prepared to land/abort immediately to the nearest and
safest g round point should a manned aircraft approach my location or I suspect manned aircraft may approach near my location. My UAS is capable of vertical and horizontal operations, and are flown only within my line of sight of me, as the remote control pilot. Ut il izing battery power rather than combustible fuels, flights generally last between five (5) to ten (10 ) minut es, with an altitude under two hundred (20 0) feet. I, Russell M. Squire, utilize a fully charged battery for every flight as an added safety preca ution and we have two spare batteries fully charged as back

- ups. Furthermore the UAS

4

- Fail Safe Mode includes safe circle for operation, position hold, self

- leveling, altitude command, GPS, return to home feature and safety control to return home or land in the event of communication interruption between the Remote Control Transmitter and the UAS. See Appendix A

– Operator Manual for DJI Phantom 3 Professional

### Russell M. Squire, Sly Dog Production, PLLC, Bozeman, MT

– Section 333 Exemption Petition

offers pre

- sets to alert us when the battery has discharged to 30%

, so there is plenty of time to land prior to the batteries expiration. The complete flight time for each battery is between 20 and 23 minutes with the 30% level generally reached within 16 minutes of the commencement of flight operations

.

I , Russell M. Sq uire, do not operate my UAS at or below manufacture recommend minimum charge
levels for operation; preferring to remain well within a safe operating range to insure adequate communication between radio control and UAS to eliminate potential for crash, loss of control or
hazard. Reserve batteries are at hand with each exercise to insure replacement for sufficient safe level of operation. I do not believe in taking risk that may cause a crash that could create hazard to the public/property/manned aircraft, an d have no desire to lose an inv estment. I have clocked hundreds of
hours of practice flights and have filmed numerous subject properties as a hobbyist simulating flights for future commercial use to gain familiarization with the characteristics of this spe cific UAS's performance
under different temperature and weather conditions. I also practice computerized simulated flights to maintain adequate skills and response reflex time and regularly trai n on the flight simulator to keep my skills sharp.

I, Russell M. Squire , am extremely cautious when operating of my UAS/ultra lightweight unmanned aircraft and will not “create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public.” 112 P.L. 95 § 333 (b). Given the small size and weight of my UAS it falls well within Congress’s contemplated safety zone when it promulgated the Reform Act and the corresponding directive to integrate UAS's into the national airspace system. Russell M. Squire’s UAS, used in hobby flight, has a demonstrable safety
record with ov er 2 00 flight hours logged, receives regular maintenance and does not pose any threat to the general public or national security.

IV. How Russell M. Squire’s Request Will Benefit the Public As A Whole:

Aerial video for geographical awareness and for real estate marketing has been around for a long time through manned fixed wing aircraft and helicopters. For small budget real estate companies and average homeowners the expense of such aerial video is cost prohibitive . Only large companies and high

- end Realtors or luxury homeowners can afford t o absorb such expense. This has deprived non

luxury homeowners and Realtors with less disposable income from a valuable marketing tool. Manned aircraft pose a threat to the publi c because of combustible fuels, a th reat that our UAS does not have
because it uses no combustible f uel but rather a simple lithium

- ion rechargeable battery. If we travel on commercial airlines with our UAS then we carry on all lithium ion batteries per TS A regulations.

Congress has already proclaimed that it is in the public’s interest to integrate commercially flown UAS's into the national airspace system, hence the passing of the Reform Act. Granting my, Russell M. Squire’s

, exemption request furthers t he public interest through academic/visual awareness of the geographical
benefits in and around the Bozeman, Montana area . My ultra light weight UAS is battery powered and creates no emissions that can harm the environment. The consequence of my ultra ligh t weight UAS crashing is far less than a full size helicopter or fixed wing aircraft; which are heavy, contain combustible fuel and can cause catastrophic devastation to the public.

The public’s interest is furthered by minimizing ecological and crash thr eat by permitting aerial video
and photo capture through my battery operated ultra light weight UAS's. Permitting me, Russell M.

### Russell M. Squire, Sly Dog Production, PLLC, Bozeman, MT

– Section 333 Exemption Petition

Squire, to immediately fly within national air space furthers economic growth. Granting my exemption request substantially furthers the economic impact for the Bozeman community for companies looking
to relocate or build in the Bozeman area as well as indi viduals looking to relocate for career advancement through academ ic and geographical awareness, b oth of which serve as a n economic stimulus to the community.

V. Reasons Why Russell M. Squire ’s Exemption Will Not Adversely Affect Safety Or How The Exempti on Will Provide a Level of Safety At Least Equal To Existing Rule:

My, Russell M. Squire’s , exemption will not adversely affect safety. Quite the contrary, for the reasons stated permitting me, Russell M. Squire , to log more flight time in FAA controlled airspace, with communication with the FAA, will allow me to contribute to the innovation and implementation of new
and , as of yet, undeveloped sa fety protocols for Realtors or m arketing companies that can be embraced by the NAR 5 , and GAR 6 for development in cooperation with the FAA. In addition I, Russell M. Squire, submit the following representations of enhancements to current aerial video and photography for real

estate:

I. My UAS weighs less than 4 pounds complete with a small ultra light weight high qu ality 4K resolution camera;

II. I only operate my UAS below 2 00 feet (well within the 400 foot permissible ceiling set by the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012);

III. my UAS only operate s for 10 to 17 minutes per flight (23 minutes would be at maximum
bat tery capacity and we land when 30% capacity remains under all circumstances);

IV. I land my UAS prior to manufacturer recommended minimum level of battery power;

V. I pilot my UAS through remote control only by line of sight;

VI. My UAS has GPS a flight safety feat ure whereby it hovers and then slowly lands if communication with the remote control pilot is lost;

VII. My UAS has ground sensors to prevent fast landings;

VIII. I actively analyze flight data and other sources of information to constantly update and enhance safety protocols;

IX. I only operate in reasonably safe environment that are strictly controlled, are away from power lines, elevated lights, airports and actively populated areas;

X. I conduct extensive pre

- flight inspections and protocol, during which safety carrie s primary importance; I carry out initial research of the area to ensure it does not fall within any restricted areas and review weather forecasts and other pertinent information to ensure safe flight operations;

XI. I always obtain all necessary permissions prior to operation; and, I have procedures in place to abort flights in the event of safety breaches or potential danger.

5

- National Association of Realtor (NAR) http://www.realtor.org/

6

- Gallatin Association of Realtors (GAR) http://www.gallatinrealtors.com/

### Russell M. Squire, Sly Dog Production, PLLC, Bozeman, MT

– Section 333 Exemption Petition

My, Russell M. Squire’s , safety protocols provide a level of safety equal to or exceeding existing rules. It is important to note that absent the integration of commercial UAS into our national airspace system, helicopters are the primary means of aerial video and photogra phy for communi ty awareness and real

estate tours . While the safety record of such helicopters is remark able, there have been incidents involving loss of life; it is far safer to operate a battery powered ultra light weight UAS.

 First, the potential loss of life is dimi nished because UAS's carry no people onboard and I only operate my UAS in specific areas away from mass populations.

 Second, there is no fuel on board a UAS and thus the potential for fire or explosions is greatly
diminished.

 Third, the small size and ext reme maneuverability of my UAS allow me to remotely pilot away from and avoid hazards quickly and safely.

 Finally , given its small size and weight, even when close enough to capture amazing images, my UAS need not be so close to the objects they are focus ed on through the technology and use of post editing software allowing pan and zoom without the risk of creating those effects while flying

. Accordingly, my UAS has b een experimentally operated for familiarity and will continue to operate at
and above current safety levels.

VI. A Summary t he FAA May Publish in the Federal Register:

A. 14 C.F.R. 21 and 14 C.F.R. 91: Airworthi ness Certificates, Manuals and t he Like.

14 C.F.R. 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements f or procurement of necessary airworthiness certificates in relation to FAR § 91.203(a)(1). The size, weight and enclosed operational area of my, Russell M. Squire’s , UAS permits exemption from Part 21 because my UAS meets (and exceeds) an equivalent level o f safety pursuant to Section
333 of the Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt aircraft from the airworthiness
certificate requirement under both the Act (49 U.S.C. § 44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permit the FAA to exempt UAS's from the airworthiness certificate requirement in consideration of the weight, size, speed, maneuverability and proximity to areas such as airports and dense populations. My, Russell M. Squire’s , current and projected UAS's

meet or exce ed each of the elements.

14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an airworthiness certificate. As no such certificate will be applicable in the form contemplated by the FARs, this Regulation is inapplicable.

14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraft flight manual in the aircraft. As there are no on board pilots or passengers, and given the size of the UAS's, this Regulation is inapplicable. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by maintaining a safety/flight manual de lineating

areas o f where safety can be defined. 7 The FAA has previously issued exemptions to this regulation in Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, 10167A, 10602, 10700 and 32827.

7

- Appendix D Flight/Safety Manual

### Russell M. Squire, Sly Dog Production, PLLC, Bozeman, MT

– Section 333 Exemption Petition

14 C.F.R. § 91.121 regarding altimeter settings is inapplicable insofar as my UAS utilizes electronic global positioning systems with a barometric sensor.

14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) and (b) provides for the carry ing of civil aircraft certifications and registrations. They are inapplicable for the same reasons described above. The equivalent level of safety will be achieved by maintaining any such required certifications and reg istrations by me, Russell M. Squire

.

B. 14 C.F.R. § 45.23: Marking of t he Aircraft.

Applicable Codes of Federal Regulation require aircraft to be marked according to certain specifications. My UAS are, by definition, unmanned. They therefore do not have a cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which to mark certain words or phrases. Further, two

- inch lettering is difficult to place on such small aircraft with dimensions smaller that minimal lettering requirement. Regardless, I will mark its UASs in the largest possible lettering by placing th e word “EXPERIMENTAL” on its fuselage as required by 14 C.F.R. §45.29 (f) so that I the pilot, or anyone assisting me as a spotter with the UAV will see the markings. The FAA has previously issued exemptions to this regulation through Exemptions Nos. 8738, 10167, 10167A and 10700.

C. 14 C.F.R. § 61.113: Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: PIC.

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113 (a) & (b), private pilots are limited to non

- commercial operations. I, Russell M. Squire , can achieve an equivalent level of safety as achieved by current Regulations because my UAS does not carry any pilots or passengers. Further, while helpful, a pilot license will not ensure remote control piloting skills. The risks attendant to the operat ion of my UAS is far less than the risk levels inherent in the commercial activities outlined in 14 C.F.R. § 61, et seq. T hus, allowing me, Russell M. Squire , to operate my UAS meet and exceed current safety levels in relation to 14 C.F.R. §61.113 (a) & (b ).

D. 14 C.F.R. 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes.

14 C.F.R. § 91.119 prescribes safe altitudes for the operation of civil aircraft. It allows helicopters to be operated at lower altitudes in certain conditions. My UAS will never operate at an a ltitude

g reater than 3 00 AGL; safely below the standa rd of 400 AGL. I, Russell M. Squire , will however operate my UAS in safe areas away from public and traffic, providing a level of safety at least equivalent to or below those in relation to minimum safe altitudes. Given the size, weight, maneuverability and speed of my UAS, an equivalent or higher level of safety will be achieved.

E. 14 C.F.R. 91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections.

The above

- cited Regulations require, amongst other things, aircraft owners and operators to “have [the] aircraft inspect ed as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter. . . .”

### Russell M. Squire, Sly Dog Production, PLL C, Bozeman, MT

– Section 333 Exemption Petition

These Regulations only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. They will not, theref ore, apply to my, Russell M. Squire 's, UAS. However, as a safety precaution I inspect my UAS before and after each flight.

A Summary t he FAA May Publish in the Federal Register: A. 14 C.F.R. 21 and 14 C.F.R. 91:
Airworthi ness Certificates, Manuals and t he Like.

14 C.F.R. 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, sets forth requirements for procurement of

necessary airworthiness certificates in relation to FAR § 91.203(a)(1). The size, weight and enclosed operational area of my UAS permits exemption from Part 21 because my, Russell M. Squire ’s, UAS meets an equivalent level of safety pursuant to Section 333 of the Reform Act. The FAA is authorized to exempt
aircraft from the airworthiness certificate requirement under both the Act (49 U.S.C. § 44701 (f)) and
Section 333 of the Reform Act. Both pieces of legislation permit the FAA to exempt UAS's from the airworthiness certificate requirement in consideration of the weight, size, speed, maneuverability and proximity to areas such as airports and dense populations. My U AS meets or exceeds each of the elements. 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a) prohibits the operation of an aircraft without an airworthiness certificate. As
no such certificate will be applicable in the form contemplated by the FARs, this Regulation is inapplicable. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) requires an aircraft flight manual in the aircraft. As there are no pilots or passengers, and given the size of the UAS's, this Regulation is inapplicable. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by maintaining a manual. The FAA has previously issued exemptions to this regulation in Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, maintenance program that involves regular software updates and curative measures for any damaged hardware. Therefore, an equivalent level of safety will be achieved.

In summary, Russell M. Squire seeks an exemption from th e following Regulations:

14 C.F.R. 21, subpart H; 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113 (a) & (b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.7 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b)(2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.103(b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.109; 14 C.F.R. § 91.119; 14 C.F.R. § 91.121; 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a); 1 4 C.F.R. §§ 91.203(a) and (b); 14 C.F.R. § 91.405 (a); 14 C.F.R. § 91.407 (a)(1); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 (a)(2); 14 C.F.R. § 91.409 (a ) (2); and, 14 C.F.R. §§ 91.417 (a) & (b) to commercially operate my, Russell M. Squire 's, small unmanned vehicle/lightweight unmanned aircraft vehicle in community
Awareness and real estate operations to develop economic platforms for real estate to enhance the experience of those seeking to relocate to the Bozeman and Gallatin County areas. Currently, area
awareness and real estate aerial video and photography rely primarily on the use of larger aircraft running on combustible fuel, po sing greater potential risk to the pub lic. Granting my, Russell M. Squire ’s, request for exemption will reduce current risk levels and thereby e nhance safety.

My UAS craft do es not contain potentially explosive fuel, is smaller, lighter and more maneuverable than
conventional real estate video and photographic aircraft with much less flight time. Further, I operate at
lower altitudes and in contr olled airspace eliminating potential public risk flying to and from establish ed air fields. I, Russell M. Squire , have private pilot training and have been informally analyzing flight information and will compile safety protocols and the implementation of a flight operations manual for real estate usage that exceeds currently accepted means and methods for safe flight. Formal collection
of information shared with the FAA will enhance the FAA's internal efforts to establish protocols for complying with the F AA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. There are no passengers on board my,

### Russell M. Squire, Sly Dog Production, PLLC, Bozeman, MT

– Section 333 Exemption Petition

Russell M. Squire ’s, UAS and therefore the likelihood of death or serious bodily injur y is significantly diminished. My, Russell M. Squire’s , operation of my UAS, weighing less than 4 pounds and travelling at lower speeds within limited areas will provide an equivalent level of safety as that achieved under current FARs. Accordingly I, Russ ell M. Squire , respectfully request that the FAA grant my exemption request and am willing to cooperate in sharing information to benefit the FAA, safety of manned aircraft, and the general public at large.

Respectfully

,

Russell M. Squire , President

S ly Dog Production

, P LLC. 1087 Stoneridge, Suite 2

- A Bozeman, MT 59718
Tel. 406

- 425

- 2742