alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 216 (Monday, November 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 69220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28484]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9936-76-Region 6]

Underground Injection Control Program; Hazardous Waste Injection 
Restrictions; Petition for Exemption Reissuance--Class I Hazardous 
Waste Injection; DuPont Pontchartrain, LaPlace, Louisiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of a final decision on a no migration petition 
reissuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a reissuance of an exemption to 
the land disposal Restrictions, under the 1984 Hazardous and Solid 
Waste Amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, has 
been granted to DuPont for three Class I hazardous injection wells 
located at their Pontchartrain site located in LaPlace, Louisiana. The 
company has adequately demonstrated to the satisfaction of the 
Environmental Protection Agency by the petition reissuance application 
and supporting documentation that, to a reasonable degree of certainty, 
there will be no migration of hazardous constituents from the injection 
zone for as long as the waste remains hazardous. This final decision 
allows the continued underground injection by DuPont, of the specific 
restricted hazardous wastes identified in this exemption reissuance, 
into Class I hazardous waste injection Wells 4, 7 and 8 until December 
31, 2050, unless EPA moves to terminate this exemption. Additional 
conditions included in this final decision may be reviewed by 
contacting the Region 6 Ground Water/UIC Section. A public notice was 
issued August 19, 2015, and the public comment period closed on October 
5, 2015. No comments were received. This decision constitutes final 
Agency action and there is no Administrative appeal. This decision may 
be reviewed/appealed in compliance with the Administrative Procedure 
Act.

DATES: This action is effective as of October 22, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the petition reissuance and all pertinent 
information relating thereto are on file at the following location:

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Water Quality Protection 
Division, Source Water Protection Branch (6WQ-S), 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Dellinger, Chief Ground Water/
UIC Section, EPA--Region 6, telephone (214) 665-8324.

    Dated: October 22, 2015.
William K. Honker,
P.E., Director, Water Quality Protection Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-28484 Filed 11-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### FLOWERS v. EXCHANGE LEASING CORPORATION (two cases).

Nos. 38997, 39036.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 226 So.2d 287.
#### Ricardo Santiago COLOCADO, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41018.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 2, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24530]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Membership of the Defense Special Weapons Performance Review 
Board

AGENCY: Defense Special Weapons Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of membership of the Defense Special Weapons Agency 
Performance Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of the members of the 
Performance Review Board (PRB) of the Defense Special Weapons Agency. 
The publication of PRB membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)((4). 
The Performance Review Board shall provide fair and impartial review of 
Senior Executive Service performance appraisals and make 
recommendations regarding performance and performance awards to the 
Director, Defense Special Weapons Agency.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The effective date of service for the appointees of the 
DSWA PRB is on or about October 22, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
 D. DIAL-ALFRED, Civilian Personnel Management Division (MPC), (703) 
325-1106, Defense Special Weapons Agency, Alexandria, Virginia, 22310-
3398.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The names and titles of the members of the 
DSWA PRB are set forth below. All are DSWA officials unless otherwise 
identified:

Dr. George W. Ullrich, Deputy Director
Mrs. Joan Ma Pierre, Director for Electronics and Systems
Dr. Leon A Wittwer, Chief Weapons Lethality Division
Dr. Richard Burke, Director, Operations, Analysis & Procurement 
Planning Division, Office of the Secretary of Defense
Ms. Lisa Bronson, Director, NATO Policy, Under Secretary of Defense for 
Policy, Office of the Secretary of Defense

    The following DSWA officials will serve as alternate members of the 
DSWA PRB, as appropriate.

Mr. Robert L. Brittigan, General Counsel
Mr. Frederick S. Celec, Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of Defense 
(Nuclear Matters).
Mr. Michael K. Evenson, Deputy Director, Operations Directorate
Mr. David G. Freeman, Director, Acquisition Management Office
Dr. Kent L. Goering, Chief, Hard Target Defeat Program Office
Mr. Richard L. Gullickson, Chief, Simulation and Test Division
Dr. Don A. Linger, Director for Programs
Mr. Clifton B. McFarland, Jr., Director for Weapons Effects
Dr. Michael J. Shore, Chief, Special Programs Office
Mr. Robert C. Webb, Chief, Electronics Technology Division

    Dated: September 11, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-24530 Filed 9-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 173 (Monday, September 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23663]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[Docket No. 97-15]


Notice of Filing of Compliant and Assignment

    Orient Overseas Container Line (USA), Inc. and Orient Overseas 
Container Line v. Dollar American Exchange, Inc. Trading as Filex, 
Inc.

    Notice is given that a complaint filed by Orient Overseas Container 
Line (USA), Inc. and Orient Overseas Container Line (``Complainants'') 
against Dollar American Exchange, Inc. trading as Filex, Inc. 
(``Respondents'') was served September 2, 1997. Complainants allege 
that Respondents have violated section 10(a)(1) of the Shipping Act of 
1984, 46 U.S.C. app. Sec. 1709(a)(1), (b)(5), by failing to make 
payment on several shipments after making repeated promises to pay and 
asking Complainants to continue to accept shipments even though 
Respondents were in serious financial peril and it was unlikely that 
payment would ever be made, and abandoning containers in Manila, 
accruing unpaid demurrage.
    This proceeding has been assigned to the office of Administrative 
Law Judges. Hearing in this matter, if any is held, shall commence 
within the time limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61, and only after 
consideration has been given by the parties and the presiding officer 
to the use of alternative forms of dispute resolution. The hearing 
shall include oral testimony and cross-examination in the discretion of 
the residing officer only upon proper showing that there are genuine 
issues of material fact that cannot be resolved on the basis of sworn 
statements, affidavits, depositions, or other documents or that the 
nature of the matter in issue is such that an oral hearing and cross-
examination are necessary for the development of an adequate record. 
Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR 502.61, the initial decision of 
the presiding officer in this proceeding shall be issued by September 
2, 1998, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by 
December 31, 1998.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23663 Filed 9-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ERNEST KEISTER, : No. 4:13-cv-00118

:

Plaintiff, :

: (Judge Brann)

v. :

:

PPL CORPORATION AND :

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD :

OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, :

LOCAL 1600, :

:

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of December 2015, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. Defendant PPL’s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions, ECF No. 38, is 

GRANTED.

2. In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, Donald P. 

Russo, Esquire, is hereby found to have violated Rule 11 on a second 

occasion in the United States District Court for the Middle District of 

Pennsylvania.

3. In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, Donald P. 

Russo, Esquire, is hereby sanctioned in the form of reasonable 

attorney’s fees for this now second Rule 11 violation.

Case 4:13-cv-00118-MWB Document 63 Filed 12/29/15 Page 1 of 3
2

4. Defendant International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 

1600 Union’s Rule 54 Motion for Fees and Costs, ECF No. 56, is 

GRANTED.

5. No later than January 12, 2016, counsel for Defendants shall submit 

their separate fee bills for the time expended in defending the entirety 

of this litigation, including the instant Motions for Sanctions and Fees. 

The fee bills should be accompanied by appropriate supporting 

affidavits, which should set forth the applicable hourly rate and detail

the hours expended and work performed in defending the instant 

litigation and prosecuting the instant Motions for Sanctions and Fees. 

Such filings should detail the exact expenses and fees incurred, with 

sufficient detail that the Court is capable of determining whether such 

expenses, costs, or fees are duplicitous, excessive, or otherwise 

unnecessary.

6. No later than January 19, 2016, Mr. Russo may, at his own election, 

submit to this Court responsive papers for the sole purpose of 

contesting Defendants’ fee bill submissions and supporting papers. 

The Court will not hear arguments that go to the merits of its Rule 11, 

Rule 54, or summary judgment rulings.

Case 4:13-cv-00118-MWB Document 63 Filed 12/29/15 Page 2 of 3
3

7. No later than January 26, 2016, Defendants may, at their own 

election, submit to this Court any papers necessary to reply to Mr. 

Russo’s responsive contentions as it relates to Defendants’ fee bill 

submissions and supporting papers.

8. After January 26, 2016, the Court will award Defendants a sum 

certain, will enter final judgment on its Rule 11, Rule 54, and

summary judgment rulings, and will direct the Clerk of Court to close 

this case.

BY THE COURT:

/s Matthew W. Brann

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

Case 4:13-cv-00118-MWB Document 63 Filed 12/29/15 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2573

CHARLES L. FREEZE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Substituted for

defendant, Dr. Donald Durham Volkmer; DONALD

DURHAM VOLKMER, DR.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-03-596-1)

Submitted: May 19, 2005 Decided: May 24, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles L. Freeze, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne P. Klauer, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles L. Freeze appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his civil complaint and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Freeze v. United States, No. CA-03-596-1

(M.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2004; Dec. 15, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE MATTER OF A MEMBER §

OF THE BAR OF THE SUPREME § No. 254, 2023

COURT OF THE STATE OF §

DELAWARE: § 

§

ERIC C. HOWARD, § 

Petitioner. §

Submitted: July 24, 2023

Decided: July 31, 2023

Before TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices. 

ORDER

After consideration of Petitioner Eric C. Howard’s application for a 

certificate of retirement, which the Office of Disciplinary Counsel does not 

oppose subject to the conditions agreed upon by the parties, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

(1) Petitioner is granted leave to transfer to retirement status. The Clerk 

of the Court is directed to issue Petitioner a certificate of retirement. 

(2) Petitioner shall not return to active status in Delaware or file a 

petition to do so.

(3) Petitioner shall not engage in the practice of law in any other 

jurisdiction.

(4) Practitioner shall not provide any law-related services unless
2

under the direct supervision of a lawyer who is engaged in the active practice of 

law in the jurisdiction in which the law-related services occur. 

/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow

Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          88,233                  55,276
<SECURITIES>                                   115,015                  96,841
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,717                  27,766
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,896)                   (667)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               351,344                 185,621
<PP&E>                                         106,193                  23,884
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,381)                 (3,012)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 541,325                 231,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          146,487                  52,569
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             9                       8
<OTHER-SE>                                     394,213                 177,379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   541,325                 231,154
<SALES>                                        291,183                  77,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               346,294                  85,387
<CGS>                                           36,943                   9,177
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,067                  11,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               275,739                  84,389
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (4,896)                   (667)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 330                     304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,280                 (6,115)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,763                     498
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,517                 (6,613)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,517                 (6,613)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27                  (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21                  (0.16)


</TABLE>
### Hurricane floods of September 1938

By: Carl G. PaulsenB. L. BigwoodA. W. HarringtonO. W. HartwellH. B. Kinnison

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp867

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 


FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 


DAPHNE SNOOK 


Plaintiff, 

v. 	 4:14-CV·948 

(JUDGE MARIANI) 

MIDD·WEST SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. 

Defendants. 

ORDER 

AND NOW, THIS 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants 

Midd-West School District, Victor Abate, Ronald Wilson, Ronald Hoffman, Shawn 

Sassaman, Corey Smith, Jeremy Tittle, Sherryl Wagner, and Nancy Kroh's Motion to 

Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Doc. 13) and all accompanying briefs, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Defendants' motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED 

IN PART, to wit: 

1. 	 Defendants' motion is DENIED as to Count I (First Amendment Retaliation) of 

Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. 

2. 	 Defendants' motion is DENIED as to Count II (Fourteenth Amendment Procedural 

Due Process) of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. 

3. 	 Defendants' motion is GRANTED as to Count III (Fourteenth Amendment 

Substantive Due Process) of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs Fourteenth 

Amendment substantive due process claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

Case 4:14-cv-00948-RDM Document 27 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 2
4. 	 Defendants' motion is DENIED as to Count IV (Pennsylvania School Code) of 

Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. 

5. 	 Defendants' motion is DENIED as to Count V(Breach of Contract) of Plaintiffs 

Amended Complaint. 

6. 	 Defendants' motion is GRANTED as to Count VI (Defamation) of Plaintiffs Amended 

Complaint. Plaintiffs Defamation claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

7. 	 Defendants' motion is GRANTED as to Count VII (Abuse of Process) of Plaintiffs 

Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs abuse of process claim is DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE. 

8. 	 Defendants Victor Abate, Ronald Wilson, Ronald Hoffman, Shawn Sassaman, Corey 

Smith, Jeremy Tittle, Sherryl Wagner, and Nancy Kroh are DISMISSED in their 

official capacities from Count I, Count II, and Count III. 

9. 	 Plaintiff is HEREBY GRANTED 14 days from the date of this Order to file a 

Second Amended Complaint as to Count VI. 

2 


Case 4:14-cv-00948-RDM Document 27 Filed 03/16/15 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,743
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,860
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,603)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (22,743)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,293
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (22,993)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,293)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,293)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.012)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.012)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6014
EDDIE LEON NEWBY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOHN T. CALLAHAN, III; MARK KANTRO, P.C.; WILLIAM RUTHERFORD, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-96-1614-A) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 30, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie Leon Newby, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court'sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Newby v. Callahan , No. CA-96-1614-A (E.D. Va. Nov. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED