alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MAWI CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. ADVANCE MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1626.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 29, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 19, 1978.

McCormick, Bedford & Backmeyer and Robert A. Geiss, Miami, for appellant.

Therrel, Baisden, Stanton, Stillman, Brown & Wood and Howard A. Setlin, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and BARKDULL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is taken from a sun-unary final judgment of foreclosure, rendered in favor of appellee/plaintiff, the construction lender and mortgagee, and against various junior lienors, including appellant/defendant. ,

*565After carefully reviewing the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, it is our opinion that neither the affirmative defenses raised by appellant in its answer to ap-pellee’s complaint for foreclosure, nor its counterclaim for a superior equitable lien, raised any genuine issues of material fact prohibiting the entrance of a summary final judgment in favor of appellee.

The only question of merit concerning the propriety of the summary judgment is by way of the chancellor’s refusal to permit appellant to file an amended counterclaim and amended affirmative defenses, the contents of which might have raised a genuine issue of material fact, i. e., that appellant had completed work on the project *prior*to the execution of the note and mortgage, creating a superior equitable lien in favor of appellant.

In that the motion to amend the affirmative defenses and counterclaim was filed one day before the hearing on appellee’s motion for summary judgment and the allegations raised by the amended pleadings were contradictory to prior pleadings and affidavits which stated that labor and services were first performed on the property *after*the note and mortgage were executed, we cannot say that the chancellor abused his discretion in denying the motion to amend. *Home Loan Company Incorporated of Boston v. Sloane Company of Sarasota,*240 So.2d 526 (Fla.2d DCA 1970); *Houston Texas Gas & Oil Corporation v. Hoeffner,*132 So.2d 38 (Fla.2d DCA 1961).

Accordingly, the summary final judgment is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ROO Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Petty, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


November
                19, 2007
            
            */s/
                Robert Petty*Robert
                PettyChief
                Executive Officer
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590

Amendment to Exemption 11441A

Eagle UAV Services, LLC currently holds exemption number 11441A for the commercial operation of a 

Sensefly eBee and DJI Phantom 3 UAS. We are requesting that our exemption be amended to include 

the operation of a Honeycomb Agdrone, a UA that is currently operated under exemption 11223 issued 

by the Department of Transportation. The Honeycomb Agdrone will be used for agricultural imaging and 

surveying. We do not intend to conduct closed set filming or operations that require the close proximity 

of non-participating persons to the UA.

Aaron Rose

President

Eagle UAV Services, LLC

432 Cherry Orchard Road

Canton, Michigan 48188
Heated Umbillical 

 • Heated Pressure Regulation 

• Laminar Flow Element 

 

__________ 

ECOCHEMII-___ __, ___ 

______ l 

I I 

I 

CALIBRATION MANIFOLD 

Calibration Gases 

FIGURE 5. ECOCHEM CEMS (HCI) 

SAMPLE BUILDING 

Out to Stack 

1 09/23105 1 LILFIG5 1 020305
1

Filed 12/9/15 P. v. Avila CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JOBANY AVILA,

Defendant and Appellant. E063508

(Super.Ct.No. FVI026060)

OPINION

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Miriam I. Morton,

Judge. Affirmed.

Marilee Marshall, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Ap pellant.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Gerald L. Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney

General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, Alastair Agcaoili and Christine

Levingston Bergman, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.2 INT RODUCTION

Defendant Jobany Avila appeals from the denial of his petition requesting

redesignation of his conviction as a misdemeanor under Penal Code section 1170.18. 1

He contends (1) his conviction of receiving a stolen vehicle (§ 496d ) qualified for

re sentencing under Proposition 47, and (2) equal protection principles require that section

496d offenses be treated as misdemeanors. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

As relevant to this appeal, defendant was charged in an information in 2007 wit h

unlawfully driving or taking a vehicle, a 1998 Nissan Sentra . (Veh. Code, § 10851,

subd. (a). ) Pursuant to a plea agreement, d efendant entered a plea of no contest to the

incidentally related offense of receiving a stolen vehicle ( Pen. Code, § 496d ), a nd other

charges and enhancement allegations were dismissed

. Defendant was sentenced to one

year four months in state prison.

On April 9, 2015, defendant filed a petition for resentencing (Pen. Code,

§ 1170.18) requesting that his violation of Vehicle Co de section “ 10851 [ sic ]” be

designated a misdemeanor. The People opposed the petition on the ground that Vehicle

Code section 10851 was not affected by Proposition 47. The trial court entered an order

stating that the plea was to Penal Code section 496d, which does not qualify for

resentencing under Proposition 47.

1 All further statutory r eferences are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.3 DISCUSSION

After briefing was completed in this case, this court issued its opinions in People

v. Garness (2015) 241 Cal. App.4th 1370, and People v. Peacock

, E063095, 2015

Cal.App. Lexis 1054 ___ Cal.App.4th ___, in which we held that Proposition 47 relief

is not available to reduce a conviction of Penal Code section 496d to a misdemeanor and

that the failure to provide such relief does not violate equal protection principles

. For the

reasons set forth in those opinions, we likewise reject def endant’s contentions.

DISPOSITION

The order appealed from is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

McKINSTER

J.

We concur:

RAMIREZ

P. J.

HOLLENHORST

J.
Case 4:05-cv-00096-JEJ Document 20 Filed 01/03/06 Page 1 of 1
# Diario Oficial C 140I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 140I |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 64.° año21 de abril de 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 140I

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

64.° año21 de abril de 2021

---

| Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | Corrección de errores |
| | Corrección de errores de la Agencia Europea para la Seguridad y la Salud en el Trabajo (EU-OSHA), Bilbao — Publicación de una vacante para el puesto de director/a ejecutivo/a (Agente temporal-Grado AD 14) — COM/2020/20049 ( DO C 171 A de 19.5.2020 ) | 1 |

Sumario

Página

Corrección de errores

Corrección de errores de la Agencia Europea para la Seguridad y la Salud en el Trabajo (EU-OSHA), Bilbao — Publicación de una vacante para el puesto de director/a ejecutivo/a (Agente temporal-Grado AD 14) — COM/2020/20049 ( DO C 171 A de 19.5.2020 )

( DO C 171 A de 19.5.2020 )

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

Corrección de errores

| 21.4.2021 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CI 140/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2021

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CI 140/1

---

Corrección de errores de la Agencia Europea para la Seguridad y la Salud en el Trabajo (EU-OSHA), Bilbao — Publicación de una vacante para el puesto de director/a ejecutivo/a (Agente temporal-Grado AD 14) — COM/2020/20049

(
  Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea C 171 A de 19 de mayo de 2020
  )

(2021/C 140 I/01)

En la página 4, en el sexto párrafo:

donde dice:

«Antes de que el Consejo de Administración seleccione a una de las personas de la lista, se solicitará a los candidatos que se dirijan a los organismos competentes del Consejo y a la comisión correspondiente del Parlamento Europeo para responder a unas preguntas. El Parlamento Europeo y el Consejo de la Unión Europea emitirán sus dictámenes y declararán sus órdenes de preferencia. El Consejo de Administración nombrará al director ejecutivo después de tener en cuenta dichos dictámenes.»,

debe decir:

«El candidato seleccionado será invitado a realizar una declaración ante el Parlamento y a responder a unas preguntas por parte de miembros del Parlamento.».

---
Bureau of Justice Statistics,File name: ftelea9716at01.csv,"Appendix table 1. Standard errors for table 1: Officer-to-resident ratio for general-purpose law enforcement agencies, 1997�16","Report title: Full-Time Employees in Law Enforcement Agencies, 1997-2016   NCJ 251762","Data source:  Bureau of Justice Statistics, Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics surveys, 1997�16","Author: Shelley Hyland, Ph.D., BJS Statistician",Refer questions to: askbjs@usdoj.gov (202) 307-0765,Date of version: 8/28/2018,,"Appendix table 1. Standard errors for table 1: Officer-to-resident ratio for general-purpose law enforcement agencies, 1997�16",Year,"Full-time sworn officers per 1,000 U.S. residents"1997,0.042000,0.022003,0.032007,0.042013,0.062016,0.05"Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics surveys, 1997�16.",
**Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 

 

            In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Annual Report of Ministry Partners Investment Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Gabriel B. Encarnacion, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: March 31, 2005              
MINISTRY PARTNERS INVESTMENT CORPORATION
 
 
 
By: /s/ Gabriel B. Encarnacion
Gabriel B. Encarnacion

Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>



EX-99.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of chief FINANCIAL officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of International Surfacing, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Andrew Abouyon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Andrew Abouyon
------------------
Andrew Abouyon Chief Financial Officer
December 18, 2003
Case 4:06-cv-00503-JEJ Document 11 Filed 05/22/06 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:06-cv-00503-JEJ Document 11 Filed 05/22/06 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:06-cv-00503-JEJ Document 11 Filed 05/22/06 Page 3 of 3
#### FRANKLIN WHOLESALE, INC. v. Eddie TREADWAY d/b/a Discount Fashions. FRANKLIN WHOLESALE, INC. v. Lonnie "Bill" TREADWAY d/b/a Fashion Distributors.

No. 60087.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 6, 1977.

In re: Eddie Treadway d/b/a Discount Fashions, et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Jackson. 345 So.2d 990.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the judgment is correct.
### Artesian waters in the vicinity of the Black Hills, South Dakota

By: Nelson Horatio Darton

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp428

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-751-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

September 17, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 12, 1997, Northwest Pipeline 
Corporation (Northwest), 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84158, 
filed in Docket No. CP97-751-000 a request pursuant to Secs. 157.205 
and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.205, 157.216) for authorization to abandon by removal 
certain obsolete facilities at the Warden Meter Station located in 
Grant County, Washington, under Northwest's blanket certificate issued 
in Docket No. CP82-443-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas 
Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is on file with 
the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Northwest proposes to remove the obsolete 2-inch positive 
displacement meter at the Warden Meter Station, which has been shut-in 
since 1992, in order to allow easier access to perform routine 
maintenance on the remaining facilities since there is limited space in 
the existing meter building. Northwest states that appurtenant piping 
will be installed as auxiliary facilities under 18 CFR Section 2.55(a) 
so the former meter run can be used as a meter by-pass line when 
necessary.
    Northwest states that removing the 2-inch positive displacement 
meter will not change the design capacity of the Warden Meter Station 
since it originally was installed only to measure lower flows than the 
remaining 3-inch turbine meter could accurately measure and the 
capacity of the meter station still will be limited by the existing 
regulators.
    Northwest further states that the cost of removing the 2-inch 
positive displacement meter at the Warden Meter Station is estimated to 
be approximately $2,000.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Sec. 157.250 of the 
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the 
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day 
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and 
not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25140 Filed 9-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Bargecarrier partner ... tool: guide to importing vessel data using the dataimport/export function, ... data year - United States version**
 
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2017 | 2018
2020 | 2021| 2022 | 2023
 
SuDoc Number:EP 6.58:B 23/2/
Item Number:0484-E-03 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001066694
 
August 9, 2018
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2159 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2159

  To provide for reimbursement of the cost of certain projects at the 
                        Fern Ridge Dam, Oregon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 21, 2005

 Mr. Smith (for himself and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for reimbursement of the cost of certain projects at the 
                        Fern Ridge Dam, Oregon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FERN RIDGE DAM, OREGON.

    (a) Definition of Dam Safety Project.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law (including a regulation), the repairs initiated at 
Fern Ridge Dam, Oregon, during fiscal year 2005 shall be considered to 
be a dam safety project, as that term is defined by the Chief of 
Engineers.
    (b) Costs of Projects.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        cost of the repairs described in subsection (a) shall be 
        reimbursable in accordance with section 1203 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 467n).
            (2) Exception.--The portion of repair costs allocated to 
        irrigation as a project benefit shall not be reimbursable.
                                 <all>
```
1

From: Peter Westlin/RTP/USEPA/US 

To: Paula Smith <paula.smith@e1lab.com>

Cc: Ken Smith <ken.smith@e1lab.com>, Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Robin Segall/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Gary 

McAlister/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Parker.Barrett@epa.gov, Ron Myers/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jason Dewees/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, William 

Grimley/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, agnew.rachel@epa.gov, driscoll.tom@epa.gov, Jeff Ryan/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/14/2010 05:27 PM

Subject: Re: Secondary Al Production Source ICR

Paula: 

For analyzing the hopper dust samples and the lime samples as required in Tables 2.1 and 2.2 in the ICR for secondary 

aluminum production, we agree on the use of EPA SW 846 Methods 3051A for digestion and 6020 for non-Hg 

metals, as specified, and the alternative Method 7470A or 7471A for Hg analysis. For these same samples, we 

approve the use of SW 846 Method 3060A for extraction, as specified, and the alternative Method 7199 for Cr+6

analysis. 

Let us know if you have any other questions, 

Peter Westlin

Measurement Policy Group

OAQPS, SPPD

919-541-1058

From: Paula Smith <paula.smith@e1lab.com>

To: Peter Westlin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Ken Smith <ken.smith@e1lab.com>

Date: 07/14/2010 04:57 PM

Subject: Secondary Al Production Source ICR

Peter,

Per our conversation, 07.14.10 concerning Table 2.2 Methods for Analysis of Particulate Matter, Element One, Inc. 

requests using the following methods:

For HAP metals listed in Table 2.1: EPA 3051A for digestion, EPA 6020 for non Hg metals, EPA 7470A / 7471A for Hg 

analysis

For Hexavalent Chromium: EPA 3060A for extraction, EPA 7199 for Analysis
2

I appreciate your assistance.

Regards,

Paula

Paula Smith

Element One, Inc.

5022-C Wrightsville Ave

Wilmington, NC 28403

910-793-0128

paula.smith@e1lab.com

www.e1lab.com
#### Kenneth Harlan RICHARDSON v. Mayor Henry MILANDER.

No. 39057.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Petitions for writ of injunction denied without opinion.
#### William G. DICKIE and Barbara J. Hardwick, Petitioners, v. WOOD-HOPKINS CONTRACTING COMPANY et al., Respondents.

No. 41045.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 11, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 245 So.2d 663.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

BOYD, J., dissents.