P. 1


# OAR Box 1108 Prepped byCandice Davis



## Document

Number: 

# 76 ) ll-F- 2 Docket Number: 

# A-82-3 ?

Printed 4/16/2008 12:19:09 PM Sheet 76 of 77

### V? ;

lmm,*«^ s - , --" , T

## tl.iC2A.99 l j !

~~ "XX' •""••'•.

? I r ; . 1.7: .. , •.- » _ J 

# SEF A U.S . ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENC Y RMaWrch Triut^ c Parte . Nort h Carolin a 2771 1



### Octobe r 2 , 199 0

I0T E TO : Carl a Levesqu e

OPP E (PM-223 ) Pleas e forwar d th e attache d SF-8 3 an d Supportin g Statemen t fo r th e NSP S fo r Calciner s and Dryer s in Minera l Industrie s t o th e Offic e o f Managemen t an d budget A 

### a t th e appropriat e time .

Shirle yTable r OAQPS/ESD/SD B Attachmen t

# I ' J P. 3

Standar d For m 83 (Rev . Septembe r1983 ) 

# Request fo rOM B Revie w Importan t Read instruction s before completin g form
. D o no t us e th e sam e S F 8 3 t o request bot h a n Executive Orde r1229 1 reviewan d approva l unde r th e Paperwor k

Reductio n Act . Answe ral l question s i n Par t I . I fthi s reques t i s fo rreviewunde rE.O
. 12291 , complet e Par t I I an d sig n th e regulator ycertification
. I fthi s reques t i s fo rapprova l unde rth e Paperwor k Reductio n Act an d 5 CFR 1320 , ski p Par

t II , complet e Par

t II I an d sig n th e paperwor k certification
. Sen d thre e copie s o fthi s form , th e materia ! t o b e reviewed , an d fo r

paperwork—thre e copie s ofth e supportin g statement , to : Offic e o fInformatio n an d Regulator yAffair s Offic e ofManagemen t an d Budge t Attention : Docke t Library , Roo m 320 1 Washington , DC 2050 3 PAR TI.—Complet e Thi s Par t fo rAl l Requests . 1 . Department/agencyan d Bureau/offic e originatin g reques t U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Offic e o f Ai r an d Radiatio n 2 . Agenc ycod e 2 0 6 0 3 . Nam e ofperso n wh o ca n bestanswe rquestion s regardin g thi s request Shirle yTabler . OAQPS/ESD/SD B (MD-13 ) Telephon e numbe r (FT S ) 629-525 6 4 . Titl e ofinformatio n collectio n o rrulemakin g Ne wSourc e Performanc e Standard s fo r Calciner s and Dryer s i n Minera l Industrie s - - Reportin g and Recordkeepin g
5 . Lega l authorit yfo rinformatio n collectio n o rrul e (cite United States Code, Public

Law, or Executive

Order) 4 2 us c7411 , 741 4 o r 6 . Affecte d publi c(check all that apply) 1 D Individual s o rhousehold s 2 LT J Stat e o rloca l government s PAR TII.—Complet e Thi s Part On l 7 . Regulatio n Identifie rNumbe r(RIN ) 5 L J Federa l agencie s o remployee s 3 D Farm s 6 D Non-profi tinstitution s 4 JQ } Businesse s o rothe rfor-profi t7 LT J Smal l businesse s o rorganization s yi fth e Reques

t is fo rOM B Revie

wUnde rExecutiv

e Orde r1229 1

, n rNon e assigne d \~\ 8 . Typ e ofsubmissio n (check one in each category) Ciassrficstlon 1 •Majo r 2 D Nonmajo r Stage of development 1 O Propose d o rdraft 2 O Fina l o rinteri m final , wit h prio rproposa l 3 0 Fina l o rinteri m final , withou tprio rproposa l Type of review requested 1 •Standard 2 D Pendin g 3 L J Emergenc

y 4 U Statutoryo rjudicia l deadlin e 9 . CFR sectio n affecte d 10 . Does thi s regulatio n contai n reportin g o rrecordkeepin g requirement s tha trequir e OM B approva l unde rth e Paperwor k Reductio n Act an d 5 CFR 1320 7P I Y M l~ l N O
Certificatio n forRegulator ySubmission

s I n submittin g thi s requestfo rOM B review , th e authorize d regulator ycontactan d th e progra m officia l certif ytha tth e requirement s ofE.O
. 1229 1 an d an yapplicabl e polic ydirective s hav

e bee n complie d with . Signature o

fprogra m officia l Signature o

fauthorize d regulator

ycontact Dat e

Dat e 12 . (OMB

use only) 83-10 8 Standard Form 8 3 (Rev
. 9 S3
. Prescribe d b

yOt.'. S 5 CFR 132 0 an d E.O
. 1229 1P. 4 Ai r Pollutio n Contro l PAR TIII.—Complet e Thi s PartOnl yI fth e Reques ti s fo rApprova l o fa Collectio n o fInformatio n Unde rth e Paperwor k Reductio n Ac tan d 5 CF R 1320 . Environmenta l Monitoring 13 . Abstract—Describe needs , use s an d affecte d publi c i n 5 0 words orles s 

### Th e NSP S affec t owner s o r operator s o f plant s tha t proces s mineral s i n calciner s o r dryers . Th e owner s o r operator s mus t submi t semiannua l report s t o enabl e th e Administrato r t o identif ynew , modified , o r reconstructe dsource s subjec t t o th e standard s and t o ensur e tha t th e standard s ar e bein g continuousl yachieved . 14 . Typ e o finformatio n collectio n (check only one) Information

collections

not contained

In rules 1 LT J Regularsubmissio n Information

collections

contained

In rules 3 D Existin g regulatio n (no change proposed) 4 LT J Notice o

fpropose

d rulemakin g (NPRM ) 5 [ 3 Final , NPR M was previouslypublishe d 2 LT

J Emergenc

ysubmissio n (certification attached) 6 Fina l o rinteri m fina l withou t prio rNPR M A D Regula rsubmissio n B LT J Emergenc

ysubmissio n (certification attached) 7 . Ente rdate o fexpected oractua l Federa l Registe rpublicatio n at thi s stage o frulemakin g (month, day. year):. Februar y198 9 _ 15 . Typ e o frevie wrequested (check

only one) 1 W Ne wcollectio n 2 L J Revisio n o

fa currentl yapproved collectio n 3 O Extensio n o

fth e expiratio n date o

fa currentl yapprove

d collectio n without an

ychange i n th e substanc e o ri n th e method o

fcollectio n 4 L J Reinstatemen t o fa previouslyapprove

d collectio n fo rwhic h approva l ha s expired 5 D Existin g collectio n i n us e withou t a n OM B contro l numbe r 16 . Agenc

yreportfor m numbers) (include standard/optional

form numbers)) 074 6 17 . Annua l reportin g ordisclosur e burde n 1 Numbe ro

frespondent

s 2 Numbe ro

fresponse

s perresponden t . . 3 Tota l annua l response s (line 1 times line 2) 4 Hour s perrespons

e 5 Tota l hours (line

3 times line 4)
. . . . Jil. 

### JuQ. 2 5 8 19,82 4 (• - 22 . Purpos e o finformatio n collectio n (check as many as apply)

- Q Applicatio n fo rbenefits 2 D Program evaluatio n 3 D Genera l purpos

e statistics 4 £ 3 Regulator

yorcomplianc

e 5 IT J Progra m plannin g o

rmanagemen t 6 D Researc h 7 •Audi t N 18 . Annua l recordkeepin g burde n 1 Numbe ro

frecor d keeper s 2 Annua l hour

s perrecordkeepe r 3 Tota l recordkeepin g hour s (line 1times line 2) 4 Recordkeepin g retentio n period 4 3 4 2 1,81 2 2 year s 19 . Tota l annua l burde n 1 Requeste d (line

17-5 plus line 18-3)
. 2 I n current OM B inventor y. . . . 3 Differenc e (line

1 less line 2)
. . . Explanation

of difference 4 Program change 5 Adjustment 

# nrijsiti^x) 21,63 6 '23 . Frequenc yo frecordkeepin g orreportin g (check all that apply)

- G3xRecordkeepin g Reporting 2 D O n occasio n 3 •Weekly 4 LT J Monthly 5 D Quarterl y &\£\ Semi-annually 7 L J Annually B D Bienniall y 9 0 Othe r(describe): One-tim e report s 20 . Current (mos

t recent) OM B contro l numbe ro rcomment numbe r 21 . Requeste

d expiratio n dat

e 

### Thre e year s fro mpromulgatio ndat e o f rul e 24 . Respondents ' obligatio n t o compl y(check the strongest

obligation

thatapplie 1 •Voluntar

y 2 D Require

d t o obtai n o

rretai n a benefi t 3 jjQ < Mandator

y 25 . Ar e th e respondent

s primarilyeducationa l agencie s o rinstitution s o

ris th e primar

ypurpos e o fth e collectio n related to Federa l educatio n programs? LT J Ye s B f | 26 . Doe s th e agenc

yus e samplin g t o selec

t respondent

s ordoe s th e agenc

yrecommen d o

rprescrib e th e us e o fsamplin g o rstatistica l analysi s ____ b yrespondents? U Ye s U O I 27 . Regulator

yauthorit

yfo rth e informatio n collectio n • 4 0 rPB y6 0 Subpar tUUU ; or . FR . ; or , Othe r(specify): Paperwor k

Certificatio n " I n submittin g thi s reques t fo rOM B approval , th e agenc yhead , th e seniorofficia l o ra n authorized representative , certifies that th e requirements o f5 CFR 1320 , Privac yAct, statistica l standard s o rdirectives , an d anyothe rapplicabl e informatio n polic yd/ective s hav

e bee n complied with . n/J- Signatur e o fprogra-r : or ; 'C—.Director , Offic e o f Aif rQualit vPlannin o & Standard s Date 

# .j life* Signatur e o fagenc y--a c J 

# /



# /T DateP. 5

SUPPORTIN GSTATEMEN T FO RSTANDAR D FOR M8 3 REPORTIN GAND RECORDKEEPIN GREQUIREMENT S FORTH E NE WSOURC E PERFORMANC E STANDARD S FO R CALCINER S AN D DRYER S I N MINERA L INDUSTRIE S
A . JUSTIFICATIO N 1 . Nee d fo r th e Informatio n Collection . Th e U . S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y(EPA ) i s charge d unde r Sectio n 11 1 o f th e Clea n Ai r Act , a s amended , t o establis hstandard s o f performanc e fo r ne wstationar y source s tha t reflect :

. . . applicatio n o f th e bes t technologica l syste mo f continuou s emissio n reductio n whic h(takin g int o consideratio n th e cos t o f achievin g suc hemissio n reductio n and an ynonai r qualit yhealt h and environmenta l impac t and energ yrequirements ) th e Administrato r determine s ha s bee n adequatel ydemonstrate d [Sectio n 111(a)(1)] . Sectio n 111(e ) furthe r states : Afte r th e effectiv e dat e o f standard s o f performanc e promulgate d unde r thi s Section , i t shal l h e unlawfu l fo r an yowne r o r operato r o f an yne wsourc e t o operat e suc hsourc e i n violatio n o f an y standar d o f performanc e applicabl e t o suc hsource . I n th e Administrator' s judgment , particulat e matte r emission s fro m calciner s and dryer s i n minera l industrie s cause , o r contribut e significantl yto , ai r pollutio n tha t ma yreasonabl yb e anticipate d t o endange r publi c healt ho r welfare . Consequently , ne wsourc e performanc e standard s (NSPS ) hav e bee n develope d fo r thi s sourc e category . Certai n record s and report s ar e necessar yt o enabl e th e Administrato r to : (1 ) identif ynew , modified , o r reconstructe d source s subjec t t o th e standard s and (2 ) ensur e tha t standard s base d o n bes t demonstrate d technolog y(BDT ) ar e bein g achieved .P. 6



### 2. Descriptio nan

dPractica l Utilit yo f th e Informatio nCollectio n Activity . a . Descriptio no f Informatio nCollectio nActivit yfo r Calciner s an dDryer s i nMinera l Industries . Report s o f star t o f construction , anticipate dandactua l startu p dates , andphysica l o r operationa l change s t o existin g facilitie s are require dt o identif yaffecte dsources . Report s o f initia l performanc e test s ar e necessar yt o determin e tha t BD T i s bein g used . Record s o f startups , shutdowns , o r malfunction s i nth e operatio no f affecte d facilitie s andassociate dcontro l equipment , record s o f opacit yand contro l devic e monitorin g parameters , andothe r informatio nrequire db y th e standard s ar e necessar yt o determin e prope r operatio nandmaintenance . Failur e t o collec t thi s informatio nwoul dallo wcircumventio no f th e standards . b . EPAUs e o f Dat a Collected . Th e informatio nwil l b e use db y Agenc yenforcemen t personnel : (1 ) t o identif ynew , modified , an drecon structe dsource s subjec t t o th e standards ; (2) t o ensur e tha t BD T i s bein g properl yoperate dandmaintaine do na continuou s basis . I naddition , record s andreport s ar e necessar yt o enabl e EP At o identif y plant s tha t ma yno t b e i ncomplianc e wit hth e standard . Base do nreporte d information , EPAca ndecid e whic hplant s shoul db e inspecte dandwha t record s o r processe s shoul db e inspecte da t th e plant . Th e record s tha t plant s woul d maintai nwoul dindicat e whethe r plant s ar e properl yoperatin g andmaintainin g contro l equipment . 3 . Minimizin g Burden . Th e Agenc ydoe s no t as k th e respondent s t o reduc e th e data , onl yt o submi t th e recorde dlog s semiannuall yfo r thos e period s o f norma l operatio ndurin g whic hth e 10-percen t opacit ylimi t fo r dr ycontro l 2P. 7

device s i s exceede d or , fo r we t scrubbers , th e pressur e dro p varie s b y mor e tha n 1 0 percen t o r th e liqui- d flo wrat e varie s b ymor e tha n2 0 per cent . Thus , th e burde n wil l b e minimize d fo r thos e respondent s wh o properl y operat e and maintai n thei r syste mt o compl ywit hth e standards . Bal l cla y rotar ydryers , diatomit e rotar ydryers , feldspa r flui d be d dryers , fuller' s eart hrotar ydryers , gypsumrotar ydryers , gypsu mflas hcalciners , gypsu m kettl e calciners , industria l san d rotar ydryers , kaoli nrotar ydryers , kaoli nmultipl e heart hfurnaces , perlit e expansio nfurnaces , tal c flas h dryers , tal c rotar ydryers , titaniu mdioxid e direc t o r indirec t rotar y dryers , and vermiculit e expansio nfurnace s controlle d b ydr ycontro l device s ar e exemp t fro m

th e semiannua l reportin g and recordkeepin g requirement s associate d wit hopacit ymonitorin g becaus e neithe r continuou s opacit y monitorin g system s (COM's ) no r Metho d 9 procedure s wer e determine d t o b e reasonabl e afte r considerin g th e cost s and potentia l benefit s associate d wit hthes e requirements . 4 . Nondup l ication . Acompute r searc ho f th e Federa l Informatio n Locato r Syste m

indicate d tha t ther e ar e n o simila r informatio nrequest s bein g carrie d ou t b yth e Federa l Govenment . Asimila r searc ho f EPA' s ongoin g Informatio n Collectio nRequest s (ICR's ) reveale d n o duplicatio n o f informatio n gatherin g efforts . However , certai nreport s require d b yStat e o r loca l agenc yca nb e provide d t o th e Adminstrato r i nlie u o f th e report s require d b

yth e recommende d standards . 5 . Consideratio n o f Alternatives . Ther e ar e n o practica l alternative s fo r gatherin g thi s informatio nothe r tha nth e alternativ e note d i nparagrap h4 . 6 . Minimizin g o f Burde nfo r Smal l Business . Som e smal l organization s ma yb e affecte d b

yth e NSPS . However , th e informatio ncollectio nrequirement s ar e th e minimu mnecessar yt o demonstrat e compliance . Th e EP Aha s criticall y 3P. 8

reviewe d th e reportin g and recordkeepin g requirement s associate d wit hth e recommende d standard s fo r calciner s and dryer s i n minera l industrie s and ha s reduce d reportin g and recordkeepin g requirement s t o dat a tha t ar e essentia l t o bot hth e responden t an d EP At o ensur e prope r operatio n an d maintananc e o f contro l equipment . Bal l cla yrotar ydryers , diatomit e rotar ydryers , feldspa r flui d be d dryers , fuller' s eart hrotar ydryers , gypsu mrotar ydryers , gypsu m flas hcalciners , gypsu mkettl e calciners , industria l sand rotar ydryers , kaoli n rotar ydryers , kaoli n multipl e heart hfurnaces , perlit e expansio n furnaces , tal c flas hdryers , tal c rotar ydryers , titaniu mdioxid e direc t o r indirec t rotar ydryers , and vermiculit e expansio n furnace s controlle d b ydr ycontro l device s hav e bee n exempte d fro mth e semiannua l reportin g requirement s becaus e i t wa s determine d t o b e unreasonabl e t o requir e th e owner s o r operator s o f thes e facilitie s t o monito r th e opacit yo f dr y contro l device s wit heithe r a CO Mo r a certifie d visibl e emission s observe r considerin g th e cost s and potentia l benefits . 7 . Consideratio n o f Collection . Mos t o f th e informatio n collectio n requirement s fo r calciner s and dryer s i n minera l industrie s ar e one-time
onl ynotification s o r report s and canno t b e performe d o n a les s frequen t basis . Thes e requirement s includ e th e notificatio n o f constructio n o r reconstruction , notificatio n o f anticipate d startup , notificatio n o f actua l startup , notificatio n o f th e inita l performanc e test , and th e initia l performanc e tes t report . Semiannua l reportin g o f exceedance s o f th e opacit ylimi t fo r dr ycontro l devices , exceedance s o f operatin g paramete r limit s fo r we t scrubbers , and correctiv e maintenenc e require d a s a resul t o f annua l calibration s o f CO M o r operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s i s require d t o ensur e complianc e 4wit hth e standard s o n a continuou s basis . Th e frequenc yo f thes e report s wa s chose n b

yth e Agenc ya s th e leas t frequen t perio d tha t stil l provide s an adequat e margi n o f assuranc e tha t facilitie s subjec t t o th e standard s wil l no t operat e fo r extende d period s i n violatio n o f th e standards . Les s frequen t informatio n collectio n coul d allo wlonge r period s o f tim e befor e poo r pollutio n contro l operatin g and maintenanc e condition s an d violatio n o f th e standard s woul d b e identified . Thi s dela ywoul d resul t i n highe r emission s and a decreas e i n ai r quality . 8 . Paperwor k Reductio n Ac t Guidelines . Non e o f th e guideline s i n 5 CF R1320. 6 ar e bein g exceeded . 9 . Consultations . Representative s o f th e minera l processin g industrie s and member s o f th e Expande d Shale , Clay , an d Slat e Institute ; GypsumAssocia
tion ; Industria l Ga s Cleanin g Institute ; Nationa l Industria l San d Association ; Perlit e Institute ; Th e Refractorie s Institute ; Lightweigh t Aggregat e Industry ; and Stat e ai r pollutio n contro l agencie s wer e consulte d durin g th e developmen t o f th e standards . No majo r problem s wer e encountere d o n whic hagreemen t coul d no t b e reached . Furthermore , Sectio n 111(b ) o f th e Clea n Ai r Ac t require s tha t EP Arevie wNSP S 4 year s fro mth e dat e o f promulgation . Thi s revie wwil l includ e an assessmen t o f suc hfactor s a s th e nee d fo r integratio n wit hothe r programs , th e existenc e o f alternativ e methods , enforceability , improvement s i n emissio n contro l technology , and reportin g requirements .
10 . Confidentiality . An yinformatio n submitte d t o th e Agenc yfo r whic ha clai mo f confidentialit yi s mad e wil l b e safeguarde d accordin g t o th e Agency' s policie s se t fort hi n Titl e 40 , Chapte r 1 , Par t 2 , Subpar t B--Confidentialit yo f Busines s Informatio n (se e 4 0 CF R2 ; 4 1 F R36902 , Septembe r 1 , 1978 ; 4 4 FR17674 ,P.1 0

March23 , 1979) . Furthermore , th e typ e o f information tha t i s being collecte d b yEP Ai s no t expecte d t p be considere d confidentia l in mos t cases . 11 . Sensitive Questions . Thi s section i s no t applicabl e becaus e thi s IC R doe s no t involve matter s o f a sensitive nature . 12 . Cos t t o th e Governmen t an d t o th e Respondents . a . Cos t t o th e Federa l Government . Th e Federa l Governmen t wil l no t incur an

ydevelopmen t cost s becaus e th e information collectio n requirement s wer e develope d a s a n incidenta l par t o f developing th e standards . Furthermore , th e Federa l Governmen t wil l no t incur an yoperatio n cost s becaus e reporting an d recordkeeping requirement s o n the par t o f the respondent s ar e required unde r Section 11 4 o f th e Clean Ai r Act . N o Federa l cost s can be directl yattribute d t o th e IC

R becaus e publicatio n an d distributio n o f th e informatio n ar e par t o f th e Complianc e Dat a Syste ma s discusse d i n Section 15 . Also , ther e wil l b e no additiona l cost s associate d wit hexaminatio n o f the record s t o be maintaine d b yth e respondent s becaus e th e examinatio n i s alread ya par t o f EPA' s periodi c inspection o f sources , whic hi s par t o f EPA' s overal l complianc e an d enforce
men t program . The onl ycost s tha t th e Federa l Governmen t wil l incur ar e use r cost s associate d wit hth e analysi s o f th e reported information . The averag e annua l Federa l cos t durin g th e firs t 3 year s o f th e IC R i s estimate d t o b e $85,720.00 . Thi s cos t i s based on a n averag e wag e o f $15.0 0 pe r hou r an

d a 11 0 percen t overhead rate . Detail s upon whic hthi s estimat e i s based ar e presente d i n Table s 1 an d 2 fo r affecte d facilitie s controlle d b ydr ycontro l device s an d we t scrubbers , respectively . Abreakdow n o f cost s b ycos t categor

yi s presente d belowfo r th e tota l o f th e two type s o f devices :

- - $83,538.0 0 2,182.0 0 Direc t Personne l cost s (includin

g overhead ) Othe r Direc t Cost s (travel ) Tota l $85,720.0 0P.1 1

D « Cos t t o th e Respondents . Respondent s ar e owner s o r operator s o f minera l calcine r and drye r facilitie s fo r whic hconstruction , modifica
tion , o r reconstructio n wil l commenc e afte r th e dat e o f proposa l o f th e standards . Th e ccs t t o industr yfo r a representativ e responden t fo r th e firs t yea r i s presente d i n Tabl e 3 . Arepresentativ e responden t wa s assume d t o b e a responden t tha t woul d b e require d t o fulfil l al l one-time
onl yreportin g and recordkeepin g requirement s an d al l semiannua l and recurren t reportin g and recordkeepin g requirement s associate d wit hmaintainin g a CO M fo r a dr ycontro l devic e o r operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s fo r a we t scrubber . Th e tota l numbe r o f hour s fo r al l burde n item s woul d b e 54 1 hour s fo r a dr ycontro l devic e and 44 3 hour s fo r a we t scrubber . Th e tota l numbe r o f hour s fo r semiannua l and recurren t burde n item s woul d b e 10 2 hour s pe r yea r fo r bot ha dr ycontro l devic e and a we t scrubber . -Th e tota l cos t o f al l burde n item s i n th e firs t yea r woul d b e $17,040.0 0 fo r a dr ycontro l devic e and $13,955.0 0 fo r a we t scrubber . .Th e tota l annua l burde n o f reportin g and recorn<eepin g requirement s o f affecte d facilitie s controlle d b ydr ycontro l device s o r we t scrubber s i n th e firs t 3 year s i s presente d i n Table s 4 and 5 , respectively . I t i s estimate d tha t ther e wil l b e approximatel y4 3 respondent s pe r yea r fo r th e firs t 3 years . O f th e 4 3 respondents , i t i s expecte d tha t 3 4 wil l b e usin g dr ycontro l device s and 9 wil l b e usin g we t scrubbers . Respondent s ar e require d b yla wt o submi t one-time-onl yreports , whic h includ e al l o f th e "notification " report s liste d unde r Item3 E o f Table s 3 and 4 . In addition , th e respondent s wh o ar e subjec t t o monitorin g requirement s woul d b e require d t o submi t semiannua l report s containin g informatio n o n thos e period s o f norma l operatio n durin g whic hth e 1 0 percen t opacit ylimi t fo r dr y contro l device s i s exceede d or , fo r we t scrubbers , th e pressur e dro p varie s b y 7mor e tha n 2 0 percent . Thes e respondent s als o woul d b e require d t o submi t

semiannua l report s tha t documen t correctiv e maintenanc e require d a s a resul t o f annua l calibration s o f monitorin g devices . Th e tota l averag e annua l cos t t o th e respondent s durin g th e firs t 3 year s o f th e ICRi s estimate d t o b e $680,482.00 . Thi s cos t i s base d o n a tota l averag e annua l burde n o f 21,63 6 person-hour s fo r 4 3 respondent s and a n averag e wag e o f $15.0 0 pe r hou r plu s a 11 0 percen t overhea d rate . However , recurren t cost s o f th e require d reportin g and recordkeepin g t o a representativ e responden t shoul d b e onl ya smal l fractio n o f th e first-yea r cost s becaus e 43 9 hour s o f th e estimate d 54 1 hour s fo r dr ycontro l device s and 34 1 hour s o f th e estimate d 44 3 hour s fo r we t scrubber s ar e associate d wit hth e initia l performanc e test s and notificatio n requirements , whic har e require d onl y once . In addition , o f th e 4 3 affecte d facilitie s estimate d t o com e o n lin e annually , 2 3 facilitie s ar e expecte d t o b e exemp t fro manymonitorin g requirement s and wil l hav e t o compl ywit honl yth e initia l notification s and performanc e tests . Cost s o f recurren t burde n item s t o a representativ e responden t shoul d b e abou t $3,200.0 0 pe r yea r fo r bot hdr ycontro l device s and we t scrubbers . 13 . Estimatio n o f Responden t Burden . Informatio n collectio n requirement s includ e th e followin g one-time-onl yreports :

- - Notificatio n o f construction , modification , o r reconstructio n n o late r tha n 3 0 day s afte r commencemen t o f suc haction ;

- - Notificatio n o f anticipate d dat e o f initia l startu p n o mor e tha n 6 0 day s no r les s tha n 3 0 day s prio r t o suc hdate ;

- - Notificatio n o f th e dat e o f initia l startu p withi n 1 5 day s afte r suc hdate ;

—Notificatio n o f th e dat e o f a n initia l emissio n tes t withi n 3 0 day s o f th e effectiv e dat e o f th e NSPS : and-- - Notificatio n o f th e resul t o f th e initia l performanc e test . I t wa s assume d tha t 2 0 percen t o f th e initia l performanc e test s wil l fai l t o sho wcomplianc e wit hth e standards . Therefore , 2 0 percen t o f th e test s wil l b e repeated , and th e report s wil l b e submitte d again . Informatio n collectio n requirement s als o includ e th e followin g semiannua l and recurren t reports :

- - Report s o f exceedance s o f th e opacit ylimi t fo r dr ycontro l device s o r exceedance s o f th e operatin g paramete r limit s fo r we t scrubbers .

- - Report s o f correctiv e maintenanc e require d a s a resul t o f semiannua l calibratio n o f th e CO Mfo r dr ycontro l device s o r o f operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s fo r we t scrubbers . I t wa s assume d tha t eac hresponden t woul d repor t on e exceedanc e pe r yea r regardles s o f th e typ e o f contro l devic e used . One-time-onl yinformatio n requirement s wil l affec t 17 1 facilitie s controlle d b ydr ycontro l device s i n th e firs t 5 year s afte r proposa l o r abou t 3 4 facilitie s pe r yea r and wil l affec t 4 7 facilitie s controlle d b ywe t scrubber s i n th e firs t 5 year s afte r proposa l o r abou t 9 facilitie s pe r year . Semiannua l report s o f exceedance s o f th e opacit ylimi t fo r dr ycontro l device s wil l affec t abou t 7 facilitie s i n th e firs t 3 year s afte r proposal . Sevent yfacilitie s wil l no t b e require d t o submi t report s o f exceedanc e o f th e opacit ylimi t becaus e opacit y monitorin g requirement s wer e determine d no t t o b e cos t effective . Semiannua l report s o f exceedance s o f operatin g paramete r limit s fo r we t scrubber s wil l affec t abou t 6 facilitie s i n th e firs t 3 year s afte r proposal . Semiannua l report s o f correctiv e maintenanc e require d a s a resul t o f semiannua l calibration s o f a CO Mfo r dr ycontro l device s o r operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s (OPMD ) fo r we t scrubber s wil l affec t 3 2 and 2 8 facilities , respectively , i n th e firs t 3 year s afte r proposal . 14 . Reaso n fo r Chang e i n Burden . Thi s sectio n i s no t applicable .15 . Scheduling . Informatio n containe d i n th e one-time-onl yreport s wil l

b e entere d int o th e Complianc e Dat a Syste moperate d and maintaine d b yEPA' s Stationar ySourc e Complianc e Division . Dat a obtaine d durin g periodi c visit s b

yAgenc ypersonne l fro mrecord s maintaine d b yth e respondent s wil l b e tabulate d an

d publishe d fo r interna l Agenc yus e i n complianc e and en forcemen t programs . Atim e schedul e fo r th e collectio n o f informatio n and publicatio n o f dat a i s no t applicabl e becaus e report s and recordkeepin g ar e triggere d b

yactio n o f th e respondents . 16 . Standar d Industria l Classification s (SIC) . Th e SI C code s fo r th e respondent s affecte d b ythes e propose d standard s ar e 1051 , 1446 , 1452 , 1453 , 1454 , 1455 , 1459 , 1492 , 1496 , 1499 , 2816 , and 3295 . B . COLLECTIO NO F INFORMATIO NEMPLOYIN GSTATISTICA L METHOD S Thi s sectio n i s no t applicabl e becaus e statistica l method s ar e no t use d i n th e dat a collectio n associate d wit hthi s regulation .



### 1 0P.1 5

TABL E 1 . ANNUAL ESTIMAT E O F OIREC T PERSONNE L COST S T OTH E FEDERAL

GOVERNMEN T FORFACILITIE S CONTROLLE DB YDRYCONTRO L DEVICE S

BURDE N ITEM Hour s Occur pe r rence s pe r occur - facilit y renc e pe r yea r (A ) (B ) Hour s pe r

facilit y pe r yea r (C=AxB ) Facilitie s

pe r year 3 (D ) Hour s pe r yea r Dollar s (E=CxD ) pe r yea r 1 . Initia l Performanc e Tes t 12 0 12

0 2.7 ° 32

4 2 . Repea t Performanc e Tes t

- Retestin gPreparatio n

- Retestin g Litigatio n Exces s Emission s

- Enforcemen t Activitie s Repor t Revie w

- Notificatio no f 1 6 12 0 2,08 0 12 0 2 construction/reconstruc t io n

- Notificatio no f anticipate dstartu p

- Notificatio no f actua l startu p

- Notificatio no f initia l performanc e tes t

- Revie w

emissio n tes t repor t

- Notificatio no f demonstratio no f COM

- Revie w

COM o r Metho d9 demonstratio n

- Revie w

exces s emission s report s

- Revie w

n o exces s emission s report s 2 2 2 8 2 If i 8 2 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1

6 12 0 2,08 0 12 0 2 2 2 2 

## a 2 1 6 1 6 4 3.4 ^

0.3 ^ 0.3 e 0.1 f 34.2 a 34. 2 34. 2 34. 2 34. 2 7.8 9 10.8 n 2.2 i 8.6 J 54. 4

36 62 4 12 68. 4 68. 4 68. 4 68. 4 273. 6 15. 6 172. 8 35. 2 34. 4 TOTAL ANNUAL HOUR S 6 . Trave l Expense s fo r Test s Attended * ( 1 perso nx3. 1 facilities/y r x1 day/tes t x$5 0 pe r diem ) + ($400/roun dtri px3. 1 roundtrips/yr ) 7 . Salary ^ ( 1 perso n x1855. 6 hours/y rx$31.50/h ) TOTA LANNUA LCOST S (trave l expens e + salary ) 1,855. 6 1,395.0 0
58,451.4 0 59,846.4 0

° Assume 34. 2 affecte dfacilities/yr . us e dry contro l devices . DAssume enforcemen t personne l attend8 percen t o f initia l test s an d34. 2 affecte dfacilitie s tested . c Assume 2 0 percen t repea t performanc e tes t du e t o failur e an d5 0 percen t o f failure s canno t retes t immediately .
- Assume enforcemen t personne l attend1 0 percen t o f retests . e Assume on e facilit y in10 0 wil l b e involve di nlitigation . ' Assume 10. 8 facilitie s ar e require dt o monito r opacit y an d1 0 percen t wil l hav e t o retes t a s a resul t o f exces s emission s reports . 9 Onl y 7. 8 o f th e 34. 2 affecte dfacilitie s wil l b e require dt o demonstrat e a continuou s opacit y

monitorin gsystem

(COM) . nAssume 7. 8 o f th e 34. 2 affecte dfacilitie s wil l b e require dt o instal l a CO M an dthre e facilitie s wil l hav e t o perform dail y visibl e emission s observations . 1 Assume 2 0 percen t o f 10. 8 affecte dfacilitie s wit hmonitorin grequirement s hav e exces s emission s t o repor t semiannually . JAssume 8 0 percen t o f 10. 8 affecte dfacilitie s wit hmonitorin grequirement s hav e n o exces s emission s t o repor t semiannually . kTest s attende d= 2. 7 initia l test s + 0. 3 repea t test s + 0. 1 enforcemen t test s = 3.1 . 1 Direc t personne l = $15.00/ hplu s 11 0 percen t overhea d= $31.50/h .P.1 6
TABL E 2 . ANNUAL ESTIMAT E OF DIREC T PERSONNE L COST S T OTH E FEnERA L

GOVERNMEN T FORFACILITIE S CONTROLLE DR YWE T SCRUBBER S

BURDE N ITEM Hour s pe r occur renc e (A ) Occur rence s pe r facilit y pe r yea r (B ) Hour s pp r

facilit y

Facilitie s Hour s pe r yea r pe r year 3 (C=AxB ) (D ) pe r yea r (E=CxD ) Hollar s

pe r yea r 1 . Initia l Performanc e Tes t 2 . Repea t Performanc e Tes t

- Retestin gPreparatio n

- Retestin g 

### 120 1 6 12 0 2,08 0 

### 120

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ? 2 1 6

120 2,08 0 12 0CVJ 2 2 ?. 8 ? 1 6 1 6 4 0.8 b

0.9 ^ 0.09 d 

### o.og e 0.9 f 9.4 a 9. 4 9. 4 9. 4 9. 4 q. 4 P. 4 1.9 9 7.5 n 

### 9

6 14. 4 10. 8 187. 2 10 8 18. 8 18. 8 18. 8 18. 8 76. 2 18. 8 150. 4 30. 4 30. 0 796. 4 3 . Litigatio n 4 . Exces s Emission s

- Enforcemen t Activitie s 12 0 5 . Repor t Revie w

- Notificatio no f 2 construc t ion/reconstruc t io n

- Notificatio no f 2 anticipate dstartu p

- Notificatio no f 2 actua l startu p

- Notificatio no f initia l 2 performanc e tes t

- Revie w

emissio n8 tes t repor t

- Notificatio no f 2 demonstratio no f OPM D

- Revie w

OPM D1 6 demonstratio n

- Revie w

exces s emission s 8 report s

- Revie w

no exces s 2 emission s report s TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S 6 . Trave l Expense s fo r Test s Attended 1 ( 1 perso nx1.7 5 facilities/y r x1 day/tes t x$5 0 pe r diem ) + ($400/roun dtri px1.7 5 roundtrips/yr ) 7 . SalaryJ ( 1 perso nx796. 4 hours/y r x$31.50/h ) TOTAL ANNUA L COST S (trave l expens e + salary )
aAssum e 9. 4 affecte dfacilities/yr . us e we t scrubbers . bAssum e enforcemen t personne l atten d8 percen t o f initia l test s an d9. 4 affecte dfacilitie s tested . c Assum e 2 0 percen t repea t performanc e tes t du e t o failur e and5 0 percen t o f failure s canno t retes t immediately . dAssum e enforcemen t personne l atten d1 0 percen t o f retests . e Assum e on e facilit y i n10 0 wil l b e involve di nlitigation . f Assum e 1 0 percen t wil l hav e t o retes t a s a resul t o f exces s emission s reports . 9 Assum e 2 0 percen t o f th e 9. 4 affecte dfacilitie s hav e exces s emission s t o repor t semiannually . nAssum e 8 0 percen t o f 9. 4 affecte dfacilitie s hav e n o exces s emission s t o repor t semiannually . 1 Test s attende d= 0. 8 initia l test s + 0.0 9 repea t test s + 0. 9 enfo-"-*.*? ' *nt . tr-'.t s = 1.75 . j Direc t personne l = $15.00/ hplu s 11 0 percen t overhea d= $31.50/h . 787.5 0

25,086.6 0 25,874.1 0

# 1 •• '

TABL E 3 . COS T T O INDUSTR YFO RAREPRESENTATIV E RESPONDEN T

e BURDE NITE M 1 . Reportin g Requirement s 

### A . B .

C . Rea d Instruction s Require d Activitie s

- Initia l performanc e tes t

- Demonstratio n o f continuou s monitorin g syste m

(CMS ) o r operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s (OPMD )

- Recalibratio n o f CM S o r OPM D (semiannual ) Writ e Repor t

- Notificatio n o f constructio n and reconstructio n

- Notificatio n o f anticipate d startu p

- Notification o f actua l startu p

- Notificatio n o f initia l per formanc e tes t

- Report s o f exces s emission s (Recurrent ) 2 . Recordkeepin g Requirement s 

### A .

TOTA L TOTA L (Tota 1 Tim e t o Ente r Informatio n

- Record s o f startup , shutdown , malfunction , etc . (recurrent )

- Record s o f al l measurement s an d informatio n require d b yth e standar d (recurrent ) ANNUA L HOUR S ANNUA L COSTS C annua l hour s x$31.50/h ) Person-hour s 

### pe r occurrenc e


### 1 33 0 100,2a, b


### 4
2 2 2 2 16



### 1. 5 1. 5

m-, a —rNumbe r 

### FO R

o f occurence s


### 1 1 1 , 

### 2
1 1 1 1 1

4 4 8

.... . a 

### i

a TH E FIRS T YEA

R Person-hour s pe r Responden t pe r yea r


### 1 33 0 100,2 a 

### 8
2 2 2 2 16



### 6 7 2
54l/443 a $17,041.50 * $13,954,50 9 P.1 7

Approximatel y5 4 percen t o f affecte d facilitie s wil l hav e n o monitorin g requirements . Th e number s i n th e tabl e ar e fo r thos e facilitie s tha t wil l hav e monitorin g requirements . Th e firs t numbe r correspond s t o a typica l facilit ycontrolle d b ya dr ycontro l devic e and th e secon d numbe r correspond s t o a typica l facilit ycontrolle d b ya we t scrubber . Assum e i t wil l tak e 1 hou r eac ht o demonstrat e pressur e los s and liqui d flo wrat e monitorin g devices . Personne l cost s = $15.00/ h+ 11 0 percen t overhea d = $31.50/h .TABL E 4 . ANNUA L RESPONDEN

T BURDE NOF REPORTIN GAN D RECORDKEEPIN

GREQUIREMENT S OF THE PROMULGATE D STANDARD

BURDE NITEM (DR Y CONTRO L DEVICES ) Occurrence s pe r Hour s pe r Hour s pe r responden t responden t occurrenc e pe r yea r pe r yea r (A ) (B ) ( C = AxB ) Respondent s pe r year 3 (D ) Hour s pe r

yea r ( E = CxD ) Dollar s

pe r year t (F ) Application s Survey s & Studie s Reporting Requirement s A . Rea d Instruction s B . Require d Activitie s N/A C N/ A

Notificatio n o f construction / reconstruction Notification o f physical / operationa l changes . Notificatio n o f anticipate d startup . Notificatio n o f actua l startu p Notificatio n o f initia l per formanc e test . Notification o f demonstratio n o f COM . Report s o f exces s emission s (recurrent) . Repor t o f performanc e tes t Repor t o f CO

Mdemonstratio n N/ A
2 2
1 6 2 2 2 32 Include d Include d i n



### i n 3B 3B 34. 2 34. 2

34. 2
34. 2 34. 2 34. 2 7.8 e 10.8 n 68. 4

68. 4 68. 4 68. 4 

### 15. 6 345. 6 1,077.3 0



## c . D . E . - Initia l performanc e tes t

- Repea t performanc e tes t

- Demonstratio n o f CO M

- Metho d 9 tes t

- Repea t o f Metho d 9 tes t

- Recalibratio n o f CO M (semiannual ) Creat e Informatio n Gathe r Existin g Informatio n Writ e Repor t 

### 33 0 33 0 10 0 1 8 1 8 4 Include d Include d 

### i

n i n 3B 3E 2 33 0

33 0 10 0 1 8 1 8 8 34. 2

6.8<
- 7.8 ^ 26.4 f 5.3 9 7.8 e 11,286. 0

2,244. 0 780. 0 475. 2 95. 4 62. 4 355,509.0 0

70,686.0 0 24,570.0 0 14,968.0 0 3,005.1 0 1,965.6 0



### 2,154.6 0 2,154.6 0 2,154.6 0 2,154.6 0 491.4 0 10,886.4 0TABL E 4 (CONTINUED )

BURDENITEM Hour s pe r occurrenc e (A ) Occurrence s pe r

responden t pe r yea r (B ) Hour s pe r

responden t pe r yea r (C=AxB ) Respondent s

pe r year 9 (D ) Hour s

pe r yea r (E=CxD ) Dollar s

pe r year 0 4 . Recordkeeping Requirement s A . Read Instruction s 

### B . C . D . EPla n Activitie s Implemen t Activitie s Develo p Recor d Syste m Tim e t o Ente r Informatio n

F . G . - Record s o f startup , shutdown , malfunction , etc . (recurrent) .

- Record s o f al l measure ments , an

d information required b

ythe standard s (recurrent) .

- Record s o f exces s emission s (recurrent) . Trai n Personne l Audit s TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S TOTA L ANNUA L COST S Include d i n Include d i n Include d i n


### 1. 5 1. 5 3 A 3 B 3 B
4

i 

### 48 J

Included in 3 E 

### 3 2 

### N/ A

N/ A 6

7 2



### 3 2 34. 2

10.8 n

3.0 k 205. 2

777. 6

96. 0
16,690.8 0 6,463. 8

24,494.- '

{

3,024.0 0

525,760.2 0

V C Oa Assum e on e affecte d facilit ype r responden t and 34. 2 affecte d facilitie s pe r yea r tha t us e dr ycontro l devices . bHourl ywag e o f $15.0 0 plu s 11 0 percen t overhea d cost s equal s $31.50 . Thi s amoun t wa s multiplie d byth e hour s pe r yea r i n Column E . c N/ A= no t applicabl e d Assum e 2 0 percen t o f initia l performanc e test s mus t b e repeate d becaus e th e initia l tes t failed . e Onl y7. 8 o f th e 34. 2 affecte d facilitie s wil l b e require d t o demonstrat e a continuou s opacit ymonitorin g syste m• (COM) . F Assum e 26. 4 o f th e 34. 2 affecte d facilitie s wil l no t us e COM' s and wil l hav e t o perfor ma Metho d 9 test . 9 Assum e 2 0 percen t o f Metho d 9 test s mus t b e repeate d becaus e o f failure . nAssum e 7. 8 o f th e 34. 2 affecte d facilitie s wil l b e require d t o instal l a CO Mand thre e facilitie s wil l hav e t o perfor mdail yvisibl e emission s observations . \ Assum e responden t wil l shutdown twic e pe r yea r fo r maintenanc e and twic e pe r yea r fo r proces s malfunctions . J Assum e 4 8 week s pe r yea r o f operation , k Assum e thre e facilitie s hav e t o hav e personne l certifie d fo r Metho d 9 testing .



# L

* 0TABL E 5



### 1 . 

### 2 3 . . ANNUA L RESPONDEN T BURDE NO F REPORTIN GAN D

BURDE NITE M Application s Survey s & Studie s Reportin g Requirement s A . B .

C . D . E . Rea d Instruction s Require d Activitie s

- Initia l performanc e tes t

- Repea t performanc e tes t

- Demonstratio n o f we t scrubbe r operatin g paramete r monitorin g device s (OPMD) .

- Repea t o f demonstratio n o f we t scrubbe r OPMD .

- Recalibratio n o f we t scrubbe r OPM D (semiannual) . Creat e Informatio n Gathe r Existin g Informatio n Writ e Repor t

- Notificatio n o f construction / reconstruction .

- Notificatio n o f anticipate d startup .

- Notificatio n o f actua l startu p

- Notificatio n c f initia l per formanc e test .

- Report s o f exces s emission s (recurrent) .

- Repor t o f performanc e tes t

- Repor t o f we t scrubbe r OPM D demonstratio n Hour s pe r occurrenc e 

### (A )



### 1

33 0 33 0 2e 

### 2 4 Include d i n Include d i n 

### 2 2 2 2 1 6 Include d i n Include d i n RECORDKEEPIN GREQUIREMENT S

(WE T SCRUBBERS ) Dccurrence s 

### re s p e

3 B 3 E

3 B 3 B ponden t r yea r 

### (B )



### 1

1 1 1 1 2

1 1 1 1 2 pe r H o 

### re s
N/A b 

### N/ A p e ( C jr s pe r aonden t r yea r = AxB )



### 1
33 0 33 0 

### 2 2 8

2 2 2 2 3 2 O F TH E PROMULGATE D STANDAR D Respondent s 

### pe r year 3 

### (D )

9. 4
9. 4 1.9 C 

### 9. 4 1.9<
- 

### 9. 4

9. 4 9. 4 9. 4 9. 4 9. 4 Hour s pe r

yea r ( E = CxD )



### 9. 4

3,102. 0 627. 0 18. 8 

### 3. 8 75. 2

18. 8 18. 8 18. 8 18. 8 300. 8 Dollar s

pe r year n 

### (F )

- -

— 296.1 0

97,713.0 0 19,750.5 0 592.2 0 119.7 0 2,368.8 0

592.2 0 592.2 0 592.2 0 592.2 0 9,475.2 0 sBURDE NITE M TABL E 5 (CONTINUED )
Hour s pe r occurrenc e (A ) Occurrence s pe r

responden t pe ryea r (B ) Hours pe r

responden t pe ryea r (C=AxB ) Respondent s Hour s

pe ryear ape ryea r (0 ) (E=CxD ) Dollar s pe rye,ar D 4 . Recordkeepin g Requirement s A . Rea d Instruction s Include d i n 3 A B . C . D . E . Pla n Activitie s Implemen t Activitie s Develo p Recor d Syste m Tim e t o Ente r Informatio n

- Record s o f startup , shutdown , malfunction , etc . (recurrent) .

- Record s o f al l measure ments , and informatio n require d b

yth e standard s (recurrent) .

- Record s o f exces s emission s (recurrent) . Trai n Personne l Include d Include d

1. 5 1. 5 i n i n 3B 3 B

4 *

489 N/

A 6

7 2 9. 4

9. 4 56. 4

676. 8 1,776.6 0

21,319.2 0

Include d i n 3 E

G . Audit s TOTA L ANNUA L HOUR S TOTAL ANNUA L COST S N/ A N/ A 4,945. 4 155,780.1 0 Assum e 9. 4 affecte d facilitie s pe r yea r us e we t scrubbers . N/ A= no t applicabl e Assum e 2 0 percen t repea t performanc e tes t du e t o failure . Assum e 2 0 percen t fai l th e initia l demonstratio n o f we t scrubbe r OPMD . Assum e i t wil l tak e 1 hou r eac ht o demonstrat e pressur e los s and liqui d flo wrat e monitorin g devices . Assum e responden t wil l shutdow n twic e pe r yea r fo r maintenanc e an d twic e pe r yea r fo r proces s malfunctions . Assum e 4 8 week s pe r yea r o f operation . hHourl ywag e o f $15.0 0 plu s 11 0 percen t overhea d cost s equal s $31.50 . Thi s amoun t wa s multiplie d byth e hour s pe r yea r i n Column E .1 * » 

## f;

' 1 ATTACHMEN T

SOURC E DAT AAND INFORMATIO NREQUIREMENT S

Requiremen t
° Notificatio n o f construction , reconstruction , modification , anticipate d startup , actua l startup , and demonstratio n o f continuou s monitorin g syste m
° Record s o f startup , shutdown , o r malfunctio n ° 2 yea r retentio n o f record s
° Repor t o f performanc e tes t dat a and result s ° Notificatio n o f performanc e tes t
° Record s o f opacit ymonitorin g result s fo r dr ycontro l device s and operatin g paramete r monitorin g devic e (OPMD ) result s fo r we t scrubber s o Semiannua l report s o f monitorin g result s Regulatio n Referenc e

60.735(a )

60.735(a ) an d 60.735(b )

60.735(c ) Genera l Provisio n Referenc e 60.7(a )

60.7(b ) 60.7(d ) 60.8(a ) 60.8(d )