alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-11-0548 SAT Date: 9/16/2011 Print Date: 10/3/2011

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 1 1 PMN 2 2 1 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; Hyd Pdt negl Keywords : Keywords: ONCO; MUTA; SENS-L,S; IRR-L,MM Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-11-0548 FATE: Estimations for hydrolysis product amine MW 578 C36H43 N 5O2 log Kow = 7.71 (E) log Koc = 7.99 (E) log Fish BCF = 3.78 (E) log Fish BAF = 0.83 (E) PMN Substance: Liquid with MP = 14 C (M) S = Reacts Hydrolysis Half-life ≤ min VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = PMN 90-99 via hydrolysis; then Hyd PDt 90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = Hyd Pdt v.strong PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P2B2 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = Hyd Pdt negl

Health : Health Summary: Expect poor absorption via all routes ( p che m ); expected to react, especially in the lung. Concern for oncogenicity based on Mn = 400, 70% <500, 90% <1000]; mutagenicity based on respiratory and dermal sensitization and lung and mucous membrane irritation based on the isocyanate moiety.

Ecotox :

Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value * algal

_ chronic value * Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value

_ Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals; SAR chemical class = isocyanate; MW 630; liquid with mp = 14 C (M); S = reacts with water at 20 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; DW hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DW TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) *

SARs neutral organic chemicals SAR Class isocyanate
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sandra J. Andre, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Date: December 24, 2008




                                            By: /s/ SANDRA J. ANDRE
                                                ___________________________
                                                    Sandra J. Andre
                                                    President and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1064

KEITH ROBERTSON,

Debtor - Appellant,

v.

COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND,

Creditor - Appellee,

and

MARC H. BAER,

Trustee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:20-cv-01876-RDB)

Submitted: June 29, 2021 Decided: July 1, 2021

Before HARRIS, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. Brian L. Oliner, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY 

GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Keith Robertson appeals the district court’s orders: (1) affirming the bankruptcy 

court’s order denying his motion for relief from judgment of the dismissal of his objection 

to a proof of claim filed by the Comptroller of Maryland; and (2) denying his motion for 

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robertson v. Comptroller of Md., No.

1:20-cv-01876-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 16, 2020; Dec. 28, 2020). We deny Robertson’s motion 

for a stay pending appeal and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30395 Summary Calendar

TONI B. METCALF,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER; ET AL.,

Defendants,

GEORGE PRICE; LISA EBARB; MICHAEL CLARK; LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL & MECHANICAL COLLEGE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

Defendants-Appellees.

CHRISTI KENNEDY JAMES

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER; ET AL.,

Defendants,

MICHAEL CLARK; LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL &

MECHANICAL COLLEGE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(96-CV-2881)

December 24, 1998 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. PER CURIAM: *

Appellants Toni Metcalf and Christi Kennedy James appeal the

dismissal without prejudice of their claims against supervisor

Michael Clark and the granting of summary judgment in favor of the

employer LSU Medical Center on their Title VII claims. Upon review

of the record and briefs we find that the dismissal without

prejudice on the claims against Michael Clark should be AFFIRMED.

We further find that the summary judgment with respect to the Title

VII claims against the employer LSU Medical Center sh ould be

VACATED and the case REMANDED in light of the Supreme Court

decisions in Faragher v. City of Boca Raton , 118 S. Ct. 2275

(1998), and Burlington In dustries v. Ellerth , 118 S. Ct. 2257

(1998), so as to allow the parties to brief and the district court

to consider arguments pertaining thereto.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART; REMANDED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR VRB BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARY, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          17,917
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                11,300
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     21,649
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          18,636
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            18,820
<LOANS>                                        101,408
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,107
<DEPOSITS>                                     155,568
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,350
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,480
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 177,107
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,122
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,675
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   390
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,188
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,627
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,627
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,561
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      250
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,828
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,853
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,251
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,251
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.73
<LOANS-NON>                                         58
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,407
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       38
<RECOVERIES>                                        13
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,632
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# P a s s

# ama q 

## u o d 

## d y Trr ii 

### b e

II 

## n d ii 

### a

## n 

# To

# wn s 

## h ii 

## p Trr ii 

## b a ll Trr 

## u s tt 

### L a n 

## d s 0 0.5 1 2 3 4Miles

Map Created by Christina Stringer February 

### 18 2013 Data Source Base Map Bing Maps Tribal Boundaries US 2010 Census
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GenTek Inc. (the Company) for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), William E. Redmond, Jr., as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Thomas B. Testa, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of his knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|    |                         
|--- | ------------------------
|/s/ | William E.
 Redmond, Jr.
|    |                         
|    | William E.
 Redmond, Jr.
|    | Chief
 Executive Officer
|    | August 7,
 2009         
|    |                         
|/s/ | Thomas B.
 Testa        
|    |                         
|    | Thomas B.
 Testa        
|    | Chief
 Financial Officer
|    | August 7,
 2009         

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
GenTek Inc. and will be retained by GenTek Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
# FAA- 20{O-OCSS;~

Contacts, Withwhom outsidethe FAAhasthis proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli CoW I 8/3]/09 Regional Airline Association Dave Lotte,rer 8/31/09 .ljrcraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 8/31109
ATA Craig Fabian 8131/09
ATA MLopez 8/31/09 09/29/06
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Susan B. Reilly, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ministry Partners Investment Company, LLC (the “Company”);





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.  The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Company and we have:





(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)  Intentionally omitted;




(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;




(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has material affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the Audit Committee of the Company's managers (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial reporting.











Date: March 29, 2011
By: /s/ Susan B. ReillySusan B Reilly,Principal Accounting Officer
Page 1 of 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

ERIC ERNST, 

 Plaintiff 

 

 v. 

 

UNION COUNTY CONSERVATION 

DISTRICT et al., 

 Defendants 

) CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:21-CV-1702 

) 

) 

) 

) (ARBUCKLE, M.J.) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER 

(On Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Specific Sections of Plaintiff’s Amended 

Complaint (Doc. 29)) 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 29) is 

GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 

(1) Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 29) is GRANTED insofar as it seeks 

to have Plaintiff’s omnibus prayer for relief for compensatory damages 

with respect to the ADEA be stricken and Plaintiff’s prayer for 

compensatory damages under the ADEA is STRICKEN. 

(2) Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 29) is DENIED insofar as it seeks to 

have Plaintiff’s omnibus prayer for relief for liquidated damages with 

respect to the ADEA stricken. 

(3) Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 29) is DENIED insofar as it seeks to 

have Plaintiff’s omnibus prayer for relief for liquidated damages with 

respect to the PHRA stricken. 

(4) Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 29) is DENIED insofar as it seeks 

dismissal of Count III of Plaintiff’s amended complaint. 

Date: September 26, 2023 BY THE COURT 

 s/William I. Arbuckle 

 William I. Arbuckle 

 U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 4:21-cv-01702-WIA Document 42 Filed 09/26/23 Page 1 of 1
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 2233

VERONICA M. JOHNSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. JUDGE JOHNNY E. MORRISON; CYNTHIA P. MORRISON , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 2:21

- cv - 00550

- AWA

- RJK )

Submitted : April 20, 2023 Decided: April 24, 2023

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Veronica Moody Johnson , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-2233 Doc: 6 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Veronica Moody Johnso n appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § § 1983 , 1985, 1986 amended complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Johnson v. Mor rison , No. 2:21

- cv - 00550

- AWA

- RJK (E.D. Va. Nov. 4, 2022) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-2233 Doc: 6 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
### An evaluation of aquifer and well characteristics of municipal well fields in Los Alamos and Guaje Canyons, near Los Alamos, New Mexico

By: Robert L. Cushman

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1809D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I,
Henrique Manuel Fusco Granadeiro, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Portugal Telecom, SGPS, S.A.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:



5.     The
company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors
and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
April 30, 2014

By:

/s/ HENRIQUE MANUEL FUSCO GRANADEIROName:

Henrique Manuel Fusco GranadeiroTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
### Reconnaissance of the geology and ground-water resources of the La Prele area, Converse County, Wyoming, with a section on the chemical quality of the ground water

By: John Richard RappW. H. Durum

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/cir243

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Robert WINEGARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-581.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 8, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 6, 1970.

*167R. Earl Collins, Wauchula, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for post conviction relief under Cr.P.R. 1.850 was summarily denied by the lower court on the ground that the motion and the files and records in the case conclusively showed that appellant was entitled to no relief. The record on appeal, however, does not conclusively show that appellant’s plea of guilty was voluntary, because there is no transcript of the arraignment proceedings. Boykin v. Alabama, 1969, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed. 274; Rudolph v. State, Fla.App.1969, 230 So.2d 14; Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446. For this reason appellant is entitled to an evi-dentiary hearing.

Reversed and remanded.

HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.