alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# STATE OFLOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS MARKE. SPICER, JR. NO. 2023 KW 0146


### MARCH 28, 2023
In Re: Mark E. Spicer, Jr., applying for supervisory writs,

22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 3932-F-2019.
BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., WOLFE AND MILLER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. EW SMM Guidry, C.J., dissents and wbuld grant the writ I application. I find the trial court abused its discretion by denying relator's motion to quash the aggravating felony of assault by drive-by shooting supporting count one. The trial court found that the assault by drive-by shooting and the murder of Officer Vincent Liberto were part of the same transaction. However, Officer Liberto was not the target of the drive-by shooting, and relator had exited his vehicle before allegedly shooting Officer Liberto. Accordingly, the shooting of Officer Liberto was not part of a continuous transaction of the assault by drive-by shooting.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
Fw: suggest edits on new paragraph

Lydia Wegman to: Tricia Crabtree, Ron Evans 06/02/2010 04:59 PM

----- Forwarded by Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US on 06/02/2010 04:59 PM -----

From: "Laity, James A." <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bridgid 

Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/02/2010 04:57 PM

Subject: FW: suggest edits on new paragraph

Generally looks good.  A few minor suggestions.   

From: Schwab, Margo 

Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 4:42 PM

To: Laity, James A.; Mancini, Dominic J.

Subject: suggest edits on new paragraph
### Ground water for public supply in St. Croix, Virgin Islands

By: Garth Edison Hendrickson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1663D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Suggestions for the development of the ground-water resources of St. Croix, Virgin Islands(1962)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON DC 

Aircraft Management Services, [nc. 

Complainant, 

v. 

Santa Rosa County, Florida 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER 

FAA Docket No. 16-12-02 

On April 8, 2015, Counsel for Respondent, Santa Rosa County, filed a Motion pursuant to 

14 C.F.R. § 16.19, requesting an extension oftime to June 26,2015, to respond to the Director's 

Determination, FAA Docket No. 16-12-02, dated March 27,2015. 

Counsel advised that the Respondent needs the additional time in order to submit a Corrective 

Action Plan or file a Notice of Appeal and Brief. Counsel certified that he contacted the 

Complainant's counsel, and that the Complainant consents to the extension. 

Part 16 is intended to expedite the handling and disposition of airport-related complaints. See 

Rules of Practice for Federally Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings Final Rule, 61 Fed. 

Reg. 53998 (October 16, 1996). The rule provides that an extension oftime may be granted 

where necessary or appropriate for a fair and complete consideration of matters before the 

agency. See 14 C.F.R. § 16.ll(a). 

An extension of time is reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, Respondent, Santa 

Rosa County, Florida is hereby granted an extension of time in which to submit a Corrective 

Action Plan or to file an Appeal pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 16.33(c). The Respondent's submission 

or filing is now due on June 26, 2015. 

Director, Office of Airport 

Compliance and Management Analysis 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on April 2015, I caused to be placed in the United States 

mail (first class, postage paid) or personally delivered a true copy of the foregoing Order 

addressed to: 

For Complainant 

Ryan P. Hatler 

Michael J. Schofield 

Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond & Stackhouse 

125 West Romana Street, Suite 800 

P.O. Box 13010 

Pensacola, FL 32591-3010 

For Respondent 

Roy Andrews 

Santa Rosa County's Attorney's Office 

6495 Caroline Street Suite C 

Milton, FL 32570 

Gregory T. Stewart 

Harry F. Chiles 

William Gamer 

Nobors, Giblin & Nickerson, P.A. 

1500 Mahan Drive, Suite 200 

Tallahassee, FL 32308 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, A CO-l 00 

be?;2?~ Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49204-49205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce (DOC) has submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for 
collection of information under provisions of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Northeast Permit Family of Forms.
    Agency Form Number: None.
    OMB Approval Number: 0648-0202.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Burden: 34,662 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 44,202.
    Avg. Hours Per Response: Varies depending on the requirement but 
ranges between 1 minute and 5 hours.
    Needs and Uses: Under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management and the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act, the Secretary of 
Commerce has responsibility for the conservation and management of 
marine fishery resources. Participants in the marine fishing industry, 
including vessel owners, operators and fish dealers, who wish to 
participate in controlled Northeast Regional fisheries must apply for 
and obtain permits. Observer and call-in requirements are also included 
in this information collection request. Without this information, the 
fisheries in the Northeast Region could not be managed.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit organizations, 
individuals, federal government, state, local or tribal government.
    Frequency: On occasion, annually.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Linda Engelmeier, DOC Forms Clearance Officer, 
(202) 482-3272, Department of Commerce, Room 5327, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive Office 
Building, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.


[[Page 49205]]


    Dated: September 11, 1997.
Linda Engelmeier,
Departmental Forms Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-24880 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510-22-P
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MELANIE A. LAMPENFELD, :

Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14-CV-0283

:

v. :

: (Judge Brann)

:

PYRAMID HEALTHCARE, INC., :

a wholly owned subsidiary of :

CLEARVIEW CAPITAL, LLC, :

and BRETT L. SCHARF, M.D., :

Defendants :

ORDER

March 4, 2015

AND NOW, in accordance with the Memorandum of this same date, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 10) is 

GRANTED in its entirety.

2. Count I as against Defendant Scharf is dismissed without prejudice with 

leave to amend in accordance with this Court’s decision.

3. Count II is dismissed without prejudice as against all Defendants with 

leave to amend in accordance with this Court’s decision.

4. Count III is dismissed with prejudice as against all Defendants.

Case 4:14-cv-00283-MWB Document 24 Filed 03/04/15 Page 1 of 2
2

5. Defendant Clearview Capital, LLC is dismissed without prejudice from 

this action.

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge 

Case 4:14-cv-00283-MWB Document 24 Filed 03/04/15 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10.31


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
SANMINA CORPORATION
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS


This SECOND AMENDMENT to the Sanmina Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Outside Directors (the “Plan”) is made this 12th day of August, 2015 by the Deferred Compensation Plans Committee (the “Committee”).


Pursuant to its authority under Plan Section 8.1, the Committee desires to freeze contributions under the Plan.


NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended, effective January 1, 2015, as follows:


1.  By adding the following to the end of Article I. 


Effective January 1, 2015, the Plan was amended to freeze deferrals. 


2.   Section 3.4 of the Plan shall be amended by adding the following new subsection (d): 


(d)     Contributions Frozen.  Notwithstanding any other provision in the Plan to the contrary, accruals under the Plan shall be frozen effective January 1, 2015 such that no Deferral Commitment shall apply with respect to Compensation earned after 2015, and no Deferred Compensation shall be credited to an Account after 2015. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Second Amendment was adopted as of the date first written above.




DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS COMMITTEE


By: /s/ Brian P. Casey    


Title: SVP and Treasurer, Committee Chair

1728801.1
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of The Pepsi Bottling Group,
Inc. (the Company) certifies to his knowledge that:  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June
11, 2005 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods referred to in the Form 10-Q. /s/ John T. Cahill
John T. Cahill
Chief Executive Officer
July 19, 2005 The foregoing certification (the Certification) is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code). A signed original of the Certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company in accordance with Rule 12b-11(d) of the Act and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 93I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0987 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 093I |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 6419 ta' Marzu 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0987

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 093I

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 6419 ta' Marzu 2021

---

| Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- |
| | Rettifika |
| | Rettifika għad-Dikjarazzjoni Konġunta tal-Parlament Ewropew, tal-Kunsill u tal-Kummissjoni Ewropea dwar il-Konferenza dwar il-Ġejjieni tal-Ewropa — L-involviment maċ-ċittadini għad-demokrazija — Il-bini ta' Ewropa aktar reżiljenti ( ĠU C 91 I, 18.3.2021 ) | 1 |

Werrej

Paġna

Rettifika

Rettifika għad-Dikjarazzjoni Konġunta tal-Parlament Ewropew, tal-Kunsill u tal-Kummissjoni Ewropea dwar il-Konferenza dwar il-Ġejjieni tal-Ewropa — L-involviment maċ-ċittadini għad-demokrazija — Il-bini ta' Ewropa aktar reżiljenti ( ĠU C 91 I, 18.3.2021 )

( ĠU C 91 I, 18.3.2021 )

1

---

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

Rettifika

| 19.3.2021 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | CI 93/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2021

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

CI 93/1

---

Rettifika għad-Dikjarazzjoni Konġunta tal-Parlament Ewropew, tal-Kunsill u tal-Kummissjoni Ewropea dwar il-Konferenza dwar il-Ġejjieni tal-Ewropa — L-involviment maċ-ċittadini għad-demokrazija — Il-bini ta' Ewropa aktar reżiljenti

(
  Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea C 91 I tat-18 ta’ Marzu 2021
  )

(2021/C 93 I/01)

Fil-paġna tal-qoxra, fil-werrej, u fil-paġna 1, fl-intestatura,

minflok:

“IL-PARLAMENT EWROPEW”,

aqra:

“IL-PARLAMENT EWROPEW

IL-KUNSILL

IL-KUMMISSJONI EWROPEA”.

---
#### Mary Anne Bradford PENNEY v. Wayne Frank PENNEY.

No. 62194.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 2, 1978.

In re: Mary Anne Bradford Penney applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to *198the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Jefferson. 357 So.2d 53.

Writ denied.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-5120

_____________________________

JERRY MEANS,

Petitioner,

v.

MARK S. INCH, Secretary, 

Florida Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

October 21, 2019

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

WOLF, B.L. THOMAS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jerry Means, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of N.V.R., D.A.R., and 

J.T.R., Children

No. 06-18-00112-CV

Appeal from the 124th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2007-

2400-B). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess 

and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, William Runnels, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 21, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
LT

Features Advantages

INPUTS

3DR imagery support Process images taken by original 3DR Mapping Platforms

Ground Control Point edit or import (.csv, .txt) Import and edit Ground Control Points to improve the accuracy of your project

Local, global and arbitrary coordinate 

reference system support in meter and feet Choose from all known coordinate systems or your own local system

Camera position and exterior orientation

(omega, phi, kappa) support

Calculate optimized camera position and exterior orientation 

from a low grade GPS and without any IMU

PROCESSING

Rapid Check processing mode Process initial project results in low-resolution in minutes only

Rapid Check Quality report Assess quality and completeness of acquired images while still on site

Camera self-calibration Optimize internal camera parameters, such as focal length, principal points 

and lens distortions, without the need of a camera calibration report

Automatic Aerial Triangulation (AAT) and

Bundle Block Adjustment (BBA)

Process automatically with or without known camera position and

exterior orientation

Quality report Assess quality of projects

Project merging Process parts of projects individually and merge them into one project

Project area definition Import (.shp) or draw specific orthomosaic and point cloud

densification/filtering areas to generate results inside specific boundaries

RAYCLOUD

EDITOR

Project viewing Assess flight plan, camera positions, inspect automatic keypoint matching 

and add uncalibrated cameras

Manual tie point editing

Annotate and edit GCPs (2D & 3D), Check Points and Manual Tie Points

with the highest accuracy, using both original images and 3D information

at the same time

Project reoptimization Reoptimize camera positions and rematch images based on GCPs and 

manual tie points to improve reconstruction of difficult areas

Fly-through animation

Create a virtual camera trajectory in the 3D point cloud, play the animation 

in real-time, export the animation as a video (in mp4 and avi format) and 

the flightpath waypoints in CSV format

OUTPUT

RESULTS

2D output results

• Geo-referenced orthomosaics in GeoTIFF output format

• Google tiles export in KML and HTML output format

• Mapbox tiles in MB format

Fly-through animations and flightpaths Point cloud Fly-through animation in MP4 and AVI format

LT 3DR Edition | Feature List | Version 1.2

Hardware specifications:

Minimum requirements: Windows 64bit / Vista, 7, 8, Server / 2-Core CPU / 4GB RAM

Recommended: 6-Core CPU i7 or Xeon / 32GB RAM (or more depending on dataset size)
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2787 

To authorize the Federal Communications Commission to process applications 

for spectrum licenses from applicants who were successful bidders in 

an auction before the authority of the Commission to conduct auctions 

expired on March 9, 2023. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2023 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To authorize the Federal Communications Commission to 

process applications for spectrum licenses from applicants who were successful bidders in an auction before 

the authority of the Commission to conduct auctions 

expired on March 9, 2023. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘5G Spectrum Author5 ity Licensing Enforcement Act’’ or the ‘‘5G SALE Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2787 IS

1 SEC. 2. FCC PROCESSING OF APPLICATIONS FOR SPEC2 TRUM LICENSES AWARDED BY AUCTION. 

3 In the case of any applicant for a license or permit 

4 for the use of spectrum in the band of frequencies between 

5 2496 megahertz and 2690 megahertz, inclusive, that the 

6 Federal Communications Commission selected through a 

7 system of competitive bidding conducted under section 

8 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 

9 309(j)) on or before March 9, 2023, and to whom the 

10 Commission has not granted the license or permit as of 

11 the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission may 

12 process the application of the applicant during the 90-day 

13 period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### Gilbert MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 38142.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 16, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 18, 1969.

Robert E. Jagger, Public Defender, and Edwin I. Ford, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Horace A. Knowlton, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

MANN, District Court Judge.

The Circuit Court of the Sixth Circuit is said to have committed reversible error in this case. The point which gives this court jurisdiction arises out of an order quashing witness subpoenas returnable before the public defender. This order recited that so much of Chapter 61-2663 as permits the defender to summon witnesses to testify before'him is violative of Article V, Section 3 of our Constitution, F.S.A. That section reads simply: “The practice and procedure in all courts shall be governed by rules adopted by the Supreme Court.” The order of the circuit judge properly recognized that in this particular the special act governing the public defender’s office in the Sixth Circuit contravenes Article V, Section 3.

Appellant secondly contends that the circuit court erred when a motion was filed seeking to compel the prosecuting attorney to furnish to the defendant the names and addresses of the witnesses on whose testimony the information was based and the judge granted the motion “to the extent that defendant be provided a list of witnesses and their last known addresses, to be used at trial.” This was error, but harmless. On the face of the information, under the printed caption “Witnesses for the State” were typed the names of four persons, three of whom testified. Our present rules, which became effective before this case was tried, afford liberal means for discovery, and CrPR 1.220, 33 F.S.A. was utilized by this defendant. No prejudice resulted from the circuit judge’s *410erroneous limitation on the order granting the list of witnesses.

Thirdly, the judge before whom the trial was held is said to have charged the jury erroneously on reasonable doubt, failing to convey to them that such a doubt may arise from a lack of evidence. Simmons v. State, 1945, 156 Fla. 353, 22 So.2d 803, on which appellant relies, involved a charge that a “doubt which is not suggested by, or does not arise from the evidence is not a reasonable doubt, and should not be considered.” The charge given in this case avoided the error of suggesting that a doubt could not arise from the lack of evidence, although that possibility is implied rather than expressed directly, and is more nearly like the charges upheld in Vasquez v. State, 1907, 54 Fla. 127, 44 So. 739, and more recently in Cobb v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 214 So.2d 372.

The record being free from reversible error, the judgment must be affirmed.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and WILLIS, Circuit Judge, concur.