alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 2, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136005(18) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 136005 

 COA: 284102 

Oakland CC: 2006-207327-FC 

JAMES NORMAN PERRY, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 13, 

2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

WEAVER and CORRIGAN, JJ., would grant the motion for reconsideration. 

MARKMAN, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration and hold this case in 

abeyance for People v Watkins (Docket No. 135787), 480 Mich __ (2008), in which this 

Court has granted leave to appeal to consider constitutional and other issues pertaining to 

MCL 768.27a. 

d0429 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 2, 2008 

Clerk
DLA upgrades LMS, reaps cloud benefits
 
  By Lance Carmack and Sara Moore, DLA Information Operations
  In a significant step forward, the Defense Logistics Agency recently upgraded its training-delivery application and moved it into a commercial cloud environment. The upgrade of the Learning Management System software suite, used to manage and deliver online education courses and training, was the first case of a DoD agency obtaining approval to host an application with sensitive data in the commercial cloud. Using a dedicated, cross-functional team, DLA made sure the effort complied withgovernment security standards to reduce risks.DLA later received Defense Department approval for SAP National Security and Amazon Web Services to host LMS in **the commercial cloud**. DoD’s demand for cloud services has lagged behind the private sector for a number of years as commercial cloud vendors struggled to meet DoD security/accreditation rules for applications with personal information. Putting in the required security for storage of this type of defense data presented a significant challenge. Teresa Cesario, DLA Information Operations project manager, and Michelle Jacobs, Defense Information Systems Agency Liaison and Hosting director, put together a team to specifically sponsor two vendors — SAPNS2 and AWS — to help them meet DoD rules. The team’s achievement was groundbreaking. Prior to this point, the DoD had not certified commercial cloud vendors for applications like LMS. For DLA employees, they’re now enjoying a “less cluttered” LMS front page, according to Cesario. It’s also easier for employees to see what training they need and when it’s due. “My Info” is displayed more prominently, among other things, so it’s simpler to update when someone relocates or gets a new supervisor. Most importantly, users of this commercial cloud solution of worldwide servers see improved reliability and speed of content delivery. As for the bigger picture DLA’s accreditation package — with some 400 security controls — is a baseline other DoD organizations may use to save them months of work. For its part, DISA is using DLA’s feedback to streamline future commercial certifications and help speed the approval process even more. Cesario confirmed interest from other organizations, “We’ve already been talking to other agencies, exchanged lessons learned and talked about what we’ve been going through and different things. There’s definitely an interest.” With this upgrade, DLA employees have a new and better capability, and at the same time the agency has blazed a trail in the commercial cloud industry for DoD.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Eugene WIGGINS v. Hon. Edwin A. LOMBARD, Clerk of Court, Criminal District Court.

No. 59967.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 2, 1977.

In re: Eugene Wiggins, applying for writ of mandamus.

Writ denied: On the allegations made, the trial court correctly denied the relief sought. The applicant’s attorney has already received a transcript for purposes of appellate review, see our docket No. 57,951 (337 So.2d 1172), affirming the conviction, and no showing is made of its need for any other purpose.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 14 , 2019.

In The 

# Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00301- CR

BRANDON JOSEPH DE LA ROSA, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 182nd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1498441

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant Brandon Joseph d e la Rosa appeals from his conviction for continuous sexual abuse of a child. After appellant waived his right to a jury, the trial court found him guilty and sentenced him to 47 years and 147 days in prison. In a single issue, appellant contends that the trial court erred in the punishment phase of trial by admitting evidence of an extraneous offense or bad act that2

appellant allegedly committed when he was under ten years of age. Because appellant failed to preserve this complaint in the trial court, we affirm.

Discussion During the guilt-innocence phase of appellant’s trial, substantial evidence was introduced that appellant sexually abused his step-daughter from the time she was five or six years old until she turned ten or eleven. During the punishment phase, the State introduced evidence that appellant had previously sexually abused two other children on multiple occasions. One of the additional victims stated that appellant was between the ages of fourteen and nineteen when the abuse occurred, and the other stated that appellant was between the ages of eight and nine when the
abuse occurred.
On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in admitting evidence concerning the alleged abuse he committed when he was under ten years of age. Appellant asserts that such evidence was inadmissible because it occurred before he could have been criminally prosecuted for the offense, citing Texas Penal Code section 8.07. Appellant, however, did not object to this testimony in the trial court on any basis

. To preserve a complaint for appellate review, a party must have presented to the trial court a timely request, objection, or motion stating the specific grounds for the ruling desired. Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a). Because appellant failed to object to the evidence that he now complains about on appeal, he failed to preserve his complaint for appellate review. See, e.g., Wilkinson v. State , 523 S.W.3d 818, 827 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2017, pet. ref’d). Accordingly, we overrule appellant’s sole issue.3

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/ s/ Frances Bourliot Justice

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Bo url iot

. Do Not Publish — T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
EXHIBIT 32.2


                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR

                      RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Pangea Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
Duncan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 18, 2006               By: /s/ Scott Duncan
                                        -------------------
                                    Scott Duncan
                                    Chief Financial Officer
### Stat e of

Utah GARY R
. HERBER T Governo r GREGBELL Lieutenant

Governor 1167948-R 8 SDM S

Departmen t

o f Environmenta l Qualit y

Amanda Smith Executive Director DIVISIO N O FENVIRONMENTA L RESPONS E AN D REMEDIATIO N

Brent H. Everett Director ERRC-184-1 0 Augus t 25 , 201 0 Bil l Murray Superfun dProgra mDirecto r U.S
. EP A Regio n 8 159 5 Wynkoo p 8EPR-P S Denver , C O 80202-112 9 Re : Nationa l Prioritie s Lis t(NPL ) Deletio n Internationa l Smeltin g an d Refinin g (IS&R ) Sit e Dear Mr^JnAxcrfSy: Th e Uta h Departmen t

of Environmenta l Quality , Divisio n of Environmenta l Respons e an d Remediatio n (DERR ) ha s reviewe dth e draf t Direc t Final Notic e of

Deletio n date dJul y 29 , 201 0 an dyou r Augus t 10 , 201 0 lette r

requestin g concurrenc e wit h th e U.S
. Environmenta l Protectio n Agency' s (EPA's ) proposa l t o delet e th e IS& RSit e fromth e NPL
. Th e DERRconcur s wit h EPA' s proposa l t o delet e th e IS& Rsit e fro mth e NP L wit h th e understandin g tha

t thi s concurrenc e i s contingen t

upo n th e approva l an dexecutio n o f th e Environmenta l Covenant s develope dfor th e Conservatio n Are aan dpropert y owne db y Zion s Farm , L.C
. If yo u shoul dhav e an y question s regardin g th e DERR' s concurrence , pleas e contac t Ton y Howe s a t 801-536-4283
. Sincerely ,



# z^^-,// . 5^t f Bren t H
. Everett , Divisio n Directo r Divisio n of

Environmenta l Respons e an dRemediatio n BHEyTH/lf

h
cc : Ton y Howes , Division of Environmenta l Respons e an dRemediatio n Duan e Mortensen , Divisio n o f Environmenta l Respons e an dRemediatio n Em aWaterman , U.S
. Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Regio n VII I Jac k Oman , Atlanti c Richfiel d Stev e Anderson , Anderso n Engineerin g Inc
.

19 5 Nort h 195 0 Wes t

• Sal t Lake City , U T Mailin g Address ; P.O
. Bo x 14484 0 • Sal t Lak e City , U T 84114-484 0 Telephon e (801 ) 536-410 0 • Fa x (801 ) 359-8853 • T.D.D
. (801 ) 536-441 4 www.deq. utab.gov Prime do n 100 % recycle dpape r
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2089

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 1271 North King Street in Honolulu, Oahu,

Hawaii, as the ‘‘Hiram L. Fong Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2089 ES

1 SECTION 1. HIRAM L. FONG POST OFFICE BUILDING.

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

3 Postal Service located at 1271 North King Street in Hon4 olulu, Oahu, Hawaii, shall be known and designated as

5 the ‘‘Hiram L. Fong Post Office Building’’.

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Hiram L. Fong Post

10 Office Building’’.

Passed the Senate March 3, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2089

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Honolulu, Oahu, Hawaii, as the ‘‘Hiram L. Fong al Service located at 1271 North King Street in
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**I, Paul S. Feeley, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Central Bancorp,Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Central Bancorp, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.February 14, 2006     /s/ Paul S. Feeley     Paul S. Feeley
#### LINEN SERVICE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC., Appellant, v. CAPE COLONY CORPORATION, Canaveral Convention Corporation, Walter T. Rose, Jr., Walter T. Rose, Sr., S. L. Moore, Alberta M. Dean, Beverly L. Rose and Branch E. Paxton, Appellees.

No. 2188.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

April 8, 1969.

Rehearing Denied May 14, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2195 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2195

                   For the relief of Ilya Shestakov.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 2006

  Mr. Stevens introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Ilya Shestakov.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Ilya Shestakov 
shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 
United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Ilya Shestakov as 
provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by 1 during the current fiscal year the total number 
of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000943904
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND V, L.P., SERIES 3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             950,372
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   950,372
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,509,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,352,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,509,897
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    55,326
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      107,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,175,333
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,227,398)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,227,398)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,227,398)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (67.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 183 (Monday, September 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Availability of Plan of Operations for Mining Operations; JO 
Claim Group, Death Valley National Park, Inyo & San Bernardino 
Counties, CA, Esmeralda & Nye Counties, NV

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 9.17(a) of Title 
36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 9, Subpart A, that the 
National Park Service has received from Mr. Joe Ostrenger a Plan of 
Operations conduct mining operations on the JO claim group in Death 
Valley National Park.
    The Plan of Operations is available for public review and comment 
for a period of 30 days from the publication of this notice. Analysis 
of the proposal will proceed from the date of its receipt. The document 
can be viewed during normal business hours at the Office of the 
Superintendent, Death Valley National Park, Death Valley, California.

    Dated: August 28, 1997.
Richard H. Martin,
Superintendent.
[FR Doc. 97-25046 Filed 9-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
Jan 22, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System West Building Ground Floor, Room w12 - 140 1200 New Jersey

Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Addendum of aircraft for operation under approved Exemption No. 13333, Regulatory Docket No. FAA - 2015 - 1848 ( Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11of the Federal Aviation Regulations ) Dear Sir or Madam: WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. (WinTec) respectfully requests an Addendum for the E384, to our previously

approved exemption. WinTec will adhere to the same rules and regulation as previously

approved for Exemption No. 13333, Regulatory Docket No. FAA - 2015 - 1848 . Reference approved exemptions : Exemption No. 11939, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

–2015

– 1398 **Appendix A: Manufacturer Small Unmanned Aerial System Information**

Joseph T. (Todd) Madison, Chief Pilot WinTec Arrowmaker MadisonT@arrowmaker.com, (813) 805 - 2714**Appendix A:**
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25245]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 091697B]


Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council will convene a 
public meeting of the Reef Fish Stock Assessment Panel.

DATES: This meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. on Monday, October 6 and 
conclude by 12:00 noon on Thursday, October 9, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at NMFS Southeast Fisheries Science 
Center, 75 Virginia Beach Drive, Miami, FL.
    Council address: Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, 3018 
U.S. Highway 301 North, Suite 1000, Tampa, FL 33619.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Atran, Population Dynamics 
Statistician; telephone: 813-228-2815.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Reef Fish Stock Assessment Panel members 
will meet to review new stock assessments prepared by NMFS for red 
snapper and gag in the Gulf of Mexico, and to review available 
biological information and landings data for gray triggerfish. In 
addition, the Panel is tentatively scheduled to review an independent 
red snapper stock assessment prepared by Dr. Brian Rothschild of the 
University of Massachusetts. All scheduled presentations will be given 
during the first two days of the meeting.
    Although other issues not contained in this agenda may come before 
the Panel for discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens 
Fishery Conservation Act, those issues may not be the subject of formal 
Panel action during this meeting. Panel action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically identified in the agenda listed in this 
notice.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Anne Alford at the Council (see ADDRESSES) by 
September 29, 1997.

    Dated: September 17, 1997.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-25245 Filed 9-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
#### STATE of Louisiana v. David Joseph SHARLOW.

No. 62282.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: David Joseph Sharlow applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of St. John the Baptist.

Writ denied. Insufficient showing of facts sufficient to justify the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.