alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF MARTIN NIELSON AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Martin Nielson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2005 of Pacific Magtron International Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and


      c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The Registrant's other officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

      a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and


      b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 16, 2005


By: /s/ Martin Nielson
------------------------------
Martin Nielson
Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June
17, 2006 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods referred to in the Form 10-Q.
 /s/ Alfred H. DrewesAlfred H. DrewesSenior Vice President andChief Financial OfficerJuly 24, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ISAAC WILLIAM BAKER, :

Plaintiff :

: No. 4:14-cv-1109

v. :

: (Judge Kane)

:

MICROBILT CORPORATION, et al., : (Magistrate Judge Carlson)

Defendants :

ORDER

Before the Court in the above-captioned action is the October 3, 2016 Report and

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson. (Doc. No. 41.) No timely objections have been

filed. ACCORDINGLY, on this 4th day of November, 2016, upon independent review of the

record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson

(Doc. No. 41);

2. Defendant MicroBilt Corporation’s First Motion to Dismiss for Lack of

Jurisdiction (Doc. No. 34) is GRANTED;

3. Plaintiff Isaac William Baker’s amended complaint (Doc. No. 19) is

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 

4. Plaintiff may amend his complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order

to address the pleading deficiencies identified in Magistrate Judge Carlson’s

Report and Recommendation with respect to standing; and

5. This matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings.

 s/ Yvette Kane 

Yvette Kane, District Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania

Case 4:14-cv-01109-YK-MCC Document 42 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 1
# UNITED TACONITE FLOW SHEET No. 5:Rev 2 (EXTERNAL) PELLET PLANT FILTERING FINAL CONCENTRATE CSEE SHEET 4) LIMESTONE !coNCENTRATE THICKENERS

### I
TRUCK DR RAIL UNLOADING 

### I I UTLD'w' PUMPS PNEUMATIC CONVEYING DRY 

### I I STORAGE SLURRY TANK
VIATER SNAP BLDVI 

# ' VACUUM LIMESTONE 

# ' I MIXING FILTERS

TANK (5) 9' X 10'; (2) 7' X10' 

### IOUTSIDE 

### L

STORAGE

### IALTERNATE FILTER CAKE VIET STORAGE SCALE I 

# ----1 BINDER FEEDER 

### I
I CONCENTRATE BINS 

### I FEED PUMPS 

### I TO BALLING CIRCUITS 

# .. SEE SHEET 6
#### Harry Latelle JONES, II, Relator, v. Hon. Richard H. COOPER, as Circuit Judge of the Ninth Judicial Circuit, Orange County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-608.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 26, 1969.

Albert O. Schwarz, Orlando, for relator.

PER CURIAM.

A Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition was filed and we issued a Rule to Show Cause directed to the respondent. A return having been filed, the matter has now been considered upon the pleadings and the briefs, and we find that the writ should be denied.

Denied.

McCAIN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ELAINE CUTLER, : NO: 4:14-CV-01758

:

Plaintiff, : (Judge Brann)

:

v. :

:

BELLEFONTE AREA SCHOOL : 

DISTRICT and JERRY STEINER, : 

an individual, :

:

Defendants. :

ORDER

March 16, 2015

AND NOW, in accordance with the Memorandum of this same date, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendant Jeffrey Steiner’s Motion to Dismiss the

Complaint (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s defamation claim against

Defendant is hereby DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s Matthew W. Brann

Matthew W. Brann 

United States District Judge

Case 4:14-cv-01758-MWB Document 17 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of ROO Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Petty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to ROO Group, Inc. and will be retained by ROO Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: November 18, 20004                       /s/ Robert Petty
                --                            ----------------------------------
                                              Name: Robert Petty
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60555 Summary Calendar

OKWY GODWIN ACHUSI, Petitioner,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A29 573 882

- - - - - - - - - - July 17, 1997 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Okwy Godwin Achusi (Godwin) petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals's decision that he will not suffer “extreme hardship” if he is deported to Nigeria. See 8 U.S.C. § 1254(a)(1). Godwin has failed to establish that he will suffer the type of unique or unusually severe hardship which would compel a finding of “extreme hardship” by the Board. See Hernandez-Cordero v. INS , 819 F.2d 558, 562-63 (5th Cir. 1987)No. - 2 - (en banc). The Board did not abuse its discretion in denying his application for suspension of deportation. See id.
PETITION DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DONNA DEITRICK, : Civil Action No. 4:06-CV-01556

 :

Plaintiff, : (Judge Brann)

 :

v. :

 :

MARK A. COSTA, et al., : (Magistrate Judge Arbuckle) 

 :

 :

Defendants. :

ORDER

April 9, 2015

BACKGROUND: 

The undersigned has given full and independent consideration to the October

16, 2014 report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle, III. 

(ECF No. 367). No objections have been filed. 

 Because this Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Arbuckle’s thorough

analysis the Court will not rehash the sound reasoning of the magistrate judge and

will adopt the report and recommendation in its entirety. 

Case 4:06-cv-01556-WIA Document 408 Filed 04/09/15 Page 1 of 2
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1.

1. United States Magistrate Judge William I. Arbuckle, III’s October 16,

2014 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in full. (ECF No.

367).

2. Defendant Thomas Yoncuski’s October 9, 2012 Motion for Summary

Judgment (ECF No. 197) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part

in conformity with the report and recommendation. (ECF No. 367).

3. The action is remanded to Magistrate Judge Arbuckle for further

proceedings. 

BY THE COURT:

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

 United States District Judge

Case 4:06-cv-01556-WIA Document 408 Filed 04/09/15 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR

                      RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Pangea Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Charles B. Pollock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 11, 2005             By: /s/ Charles B. Pollock
                                        ----------------------
                                    Charles B. Pollock
                                    Chief Executive Officer
----

 

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Reportof Empyrean Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Lee, President of the Companyand Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect. 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Robert L. Lee               ***

Robert L. Lee, President and

Chief Financial Officer

 

Dated: October 31, 2005

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49189-49190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24933]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-200, RM-9144]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Ashton, ID

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed by Mountain Tower Broadcasting requesting the allotment of 
Channel 224A to Ashton, Idaho, an incorporated community, as its first 
local aural transmission service. Coordinates used for Channel 224A at 
Ashton are 44-08-10 and 111-30-57.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before November 3, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before November 18, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 
20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties 
should serve the

[[Page 49190]]

petitioner, as follows: Mountain Tower Broadcasting, Attn: Victor A. 
Michael, Jr., President, c/o Magic City Media, 1912 Capitol Avenue, 
Suite 300, Cheyenne, WY 82001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-200, adopted September 
3, 1997, and released September 12, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-24933 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A1356. DANIEL JONES v. THE STATE. 

Daniel Jones pleaded guilty to one count of trafficking in methamphetamine.

In December 2023, Jones filed a motion to vacate orset aside the judgment, asserting

that the trial court lacked subject matter and personal jurisdiction over his criminal

case. The trial court denied the motion, and Jones filed this direct appeal in the

Georgia Supreme Court, which transferred the matter to this Court. See Case No.

S24A0615 (Mar. 19, 2024).

A post-conviction motion seeking to vacate or set aside an allegedly void

conviction is not a valid procedure in a criminal case, and any appeal from the denial

ofsuch a motion must be dismissed. See Williams v. State, 287 Ga. 192, 192-193 (695

SE2d 244) (2010); Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010).

Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

April 26, 2024

04/26/2024
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 24, 2014

p0616

Order 

Clerk

June 24, 2014

148569

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148569

COA: 318428

Wayne CC: 05-007896-FC

KEVIN DAMOND JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 3, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
12/30/201 0 13:0G FAX 2024935142 FAA ^ DMS glOOI/00 3 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OK TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON. DC 

RECEIVED 

IN THE MATTER OF ^ 

NEBO AVIATION SERVICES, I.LC iJEC 2 2 Wfi 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10EA0012 HcARING DOCKET 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. EAA-20I0-1078 ?3 

mi 

Ronnie A. Yoden '•" 'l!S-Q ^ •-••-> o O : Chief Administraiive Law Judge o '-^S=^S; 

JOINT PROPOSED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ~ ^^ ^ 

CO 

Pursuant to the order of the Chief Administrative Law Judge served November 19, 2010. 

the parties hereby submit their joint proposed procedural schedule. The parties propose the following 

dates for ihe proceedings in this matter: 

1. Completion of discovery by March 15, 2011; and 

2. Filing of stipulations and exchange of exhibits and a list of witne.sses with summaries of 

their proposed testimony by April 15. 2011. 

Respondent will be presenting a proposed .settlement to the agency for its consideration shortly. 

No concrete settlement discussions have yel otherwise occurred. 

The parties agree that Fort Myers. Florida, would be an acceptable hearing site if a hearing is 

necessary. 
12/30/201 0 13:06 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS @l002/003 

Counsel for the agency has consented thai Respondent's counsel may represent thai the agency 

concurs with the foregoing proposal and file the submission on behalf of both parlies. 

Dated: December 17, 2010 

Respectfully 

GJffiGORY SAINTON. ESQ. 

me Avikkjfi Law Firm 

One Research Court 

Suite 450 

RockvillcMD 20850 

Tel; (301) 294-8550 

Fax:(301)294-2525 

Grcg@ AviationLawExperis.com 

Counsel for Respondent 
12/30/2010 13:06 FAX 2024935142 FAA DMS @l003/003 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date served by regular U.S. mail, postage prepaid, an original and one 

(1) copy of the foregoing Joint Proposed Procedural Schedule addressed to; 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Suite 2W1000 

Washington. D.C. 20591 

And. further, that 1 have this date served via facsimile and regular U.S. mail, postage prepaid, a 

copy of the foregoing Joint Proposed Procedural Schedule addressed to; 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Adminisirative TM'W Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room EI2-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Stephen W, Brice, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel. Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3268 

FAX: 716-995-5699 

Dated: December 17, 2010 

GREfiORY S. WINTON, ESQ. 

Th^Aviation Law Firm 

Ore Research Court 

Suite 4.50 

Rockville. MD 20850 

Tel; (301) 294-8550 

Fax:(301)294-2525 

Counsel for Respondent
| · | GSE Engineering Systems (Beijing) Company Ltd., GSE Erudite Software, Inc., GSE Power Systems AB, GSE Process Solutions, Inc., GSE Services Company L.L.C., MSHI, Inc., GSE Systems Ltd., and TAS Engineering Consultants Ltd., are wholly owned subsidiaries of GSE Systems, Inc. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·        | GSE Government & Military Simulation Systems, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of GSE Power Systems, Inc. which is a wholly owned subsidiary of MSHI, Inc.  |
|---------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   · |     TAS Ltd. and TAS Northeast Ltd. are wholly owned subsidiaries of TAS Engineering Consulatns Ltd.                                              |

| Name                                                   | Place of Incorporation or Organization |
|--------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                                   |                                   |
| GSE Engineering Systems (Beijing) Company, Ltd         | Peoples Republic of China              |
| GSE Erudite Software, Inc.                             | State of Delaware                      |
| GSE Power Systems AB                                   | Sweden                                 |
| GSE Process Solutions, Inc.                            | State of Delaware                      |
| GSE Services Company L.L.C.                            | State of Delaware                      |
| MSHI, Inc.                                             | State of Virginia                      |
| GSE Systems Ltd.                                       | United Kingdom                         |
| GSE Government & Military Simulation Systems, Inc. | State of Delaware                      |
| GSE Power Systems, Inc.                                | State of Delaware                      |
| TAS Engineering Consultants Ltd.                       | United Kingdom                         |
| TAS Ltd.                                               | United Kingdom                         |
|  TAS Northeast Ltd.                               | United Kingdom                         |