alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Theodore Li, certify  that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended March 31, 2004 of Pacific Magtron International Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge,  this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact  or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light  of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with  respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,  fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of  operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented  in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  

   a. designed  such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls  and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material  information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the  period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

   b. evaluated  the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and  presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report  based on such evaluation; and 

   c. disclosed  in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the  registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has  materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based  on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of  directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

   a. all  significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over  financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  

   b. any  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees  who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial  reporting.

Date: June 11, 2004

By: /s/ Theodore S.  Li       Theodore S. Li       Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2167 

To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the sunset of certain provisions 

of that Act and the lone wolf provision of the Intelligence Reform 

and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 to July 1, 2006. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 21, 2005 

Mr. SUNUNU (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. KERRY, Mr. CARPER, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. 

REID, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Ms. LANDRIEU, 

Mrs. CLINTON, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. OBAMA, 

Mr. DODD, Mr. REED, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. JOHNSON, 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. KOHL, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. 

SALAZAR, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, and Mr. DAYTON) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, 

and passed 

A BILL 

To amend the USA PATRIOT ACT to extend the sunset 

of certain provisions of that Act and the lone wolf provision of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention 

Act of 2004 to July 1, 2006. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 2167 CPS

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF SUNSET OF CERTAIN PROVI2 SIONS OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT AND THE 

3 LONE WOLF PROVISION OF THE INTEL4 LIGENCE REFORM AND TERRORISM PREVEN5 TION ACT OF 2004. 

6 Section 224(a) of the Uniting and Strengthening 

7 America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to 

8 Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) 

9 Act of 2001 (18 U.S.C. 2510 note) is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘December 31, 2005’’ and inserting ‘‘July 1, 2006’’. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 186 (Thursday, September 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 50401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25472]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[MT-020-1020-00]


Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Montana, Miles City District, 
Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Miles City District Resource Advisory Council will have a 
meeting Wednesday, October 22, 1997 at 8:00 a.m. at the Big Horn 
Restaurant meeting room in Lovell, Wyoming. On October 23 the Council 
will participate in a field trip to the Pryor Mountains.
    Topics of discussion at the meeting will be an overview of the 
management and gather plan for the Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range, 
access, and updates on current BLM projects including the alluvial 
valley floor coal exchange.
    The meeting is open to the public and the public comment period is 
set for 12:30 p.m. The public may make oral statements before the 
Council or file written statements for the Council to consider. 
Depending on the number of persons wishing to make an oral statement, a 
per person time limit may be established. Summary minutes of the 
meeting will be available for public inspection and copying during 
regular business hours.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn Krause, Public Affairs 
Specialist, Miles City District, 111 Garryowen Road, Miles City, 
Montana 59301, telephone (406) 233-2831.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Council is to advise the 
Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning 
and management issues associated with public land management. The 15 
member Council includes individuals who have expertise, education, 
training or practical experience in the planning and management of 
public lands and their resources and who have a knowledge of the 
geographical jurisdiction of the Council.

    Dated: September 17, 1997.
Timothy M. Murphy,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-25472 Filed 9-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
EXHIBIT  32.1

                                  SECTION 1350
                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Robert Fallah,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Key Command  International Corp., hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2005 (the "Quarterly  Report") which this statement  accompanies  fully complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2)  information  contained in the  Quarterly  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of Key
Command International Corp.


Dated: June 6, 2005                           /s/ Robert Fallah
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Robert Fallah
                                              Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating,  acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been  provided to Key Command  International  Corp.
and will be retained by Key Command  International  Corp.  and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (subsection (a) and
(b)  of  Section  1350,  Chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned officer of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. (the "Company")  certifies
to his knowledge that:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
          March 22, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the  requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (the
          "Act"); and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial conditions and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods  referred to in the
          Form 10-Q.



                                                        /s/ John T. Cahill
                                                        ------------------
                                                        John T. Cahill
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                        May 5, 2003

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code).

A signed  original  of the  foregoing  certification  has been  provided  to the
Company and will be retained by the Company in accordance with Rule 12b-11(d) of
the Act and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 99.2

SITEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of SITEL Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James E. Stevenson, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|               |  | /s/ James E. Stevenson, Jr.James E. Stevenson, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|March 27, 2003 |  |                                                                            |  | 

---

QuickLinks
#### James A. LAWRENCE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-595.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 13, 1970.

Hughlan Long, Public Defender, and Robert E. Metzker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

James A. Lawrence appeals from a final judgment and sentence, after a non-jury trial, in which he was found guilty of unlawfully buying, receiving, or aiding in the concealment of stolen property.

By this appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding that he had knowledge of the fact that the property found in his possession was stolen.

It is conceded that the property in defendant’s possession was stolen property which he had purchased. He contends the evidence was insufficient to prove he knew or had knowledge of such facts that would amount to knowledge or notice that the property was actually stolen property.

We find that there was sufficient, competent and substantial evidence in this case which would put a man of ordinary intelligence and caution on inquiry, as to the fact that he was purchasing stolen property. Minor v. State, 55 Fla. 90, 45 So. 818 (1908).

The final judgment herein appealed must be and the same is, therefore,

Affirmed.
#### Robert TALMADGE, by his next friend and natural guardian, Billy Talmadge, and Billy Talmadge, Individually, Appellants, v. DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF LAKE COUNTY, Sonny Walters, and Auto Owners Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 77-1514.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 1, 1978.

*503David M. Hammond of Meyers, Mooney & Adler, P. A., Orlando, for appellants.

Monroe E. McDonald of Sanders, Mc-Ewan, Mims & McDonald, Orlando, for ap-pellee Walters.

RYDER, Judge.

Talmadge appeals an order of the trial court dismissing Walters as a defendant in a suit filed by Talmadge against Walters, appellee District School Board of Lake County (Board), and their insurer, Auto Owners Insurance Company. We reverse for reasons hereafter expressed.

Talmadge was a student at Tavares Middle School and Walters was his physical education instructor. Talmadge filed a complaint against Walters, the Board, and its insurer seeking damages for injuries received while Talmadge was performing on a trampoline. The complaint alleged that Walters forced Talmadge to perform certain acrobatics on the trampoline against his will, and while so performing, Talmadge sustained injuries to his knee and teeth. Talmadge further alleged Walters had provided him with only minimal instructions on the trampoline and that Talmadge had little experience on the equipment and was therefore unprepared to safely perform the acrobatics demanded by Walters.

Walters filed a motion to dismiss himself as a defendant in the lawsuit on the ground that, under Section 768.28(9), Florida Statutes (1975), no cause of action exists against him. The motion to dismiss was granted and the propriety of the granting of this motion is the sole issue on appeal.

Section 768.28(9), Florida Statutes (1975), does not clearly provide that no cause of action may be sustained against an employee of the Board, nor does it clearly provide that an individual employee is immune from suit as a result of injuries sustained due to his negligence. While it does state, “No . . . employee, or agent of the state . . . shall be held personally liable in tort . . .,” the statute goes on to indemnify such an employee for a monetary judgment rendered against him personally with the following language:

> “. . . [T]he state shall pay any monetary judgment which is rendered in a civil action personally against an . employee . . . which arises as a result of any act . within the scope of his employment.”

We hold that this statute acts only to indemnify an employee of the state for a monetary judgment entered against him as a result of negligent acts occurring within the scope of his employment, but does not operate as a bar against suing such an employee as a party defendant. Had the legislature intended that individual employees be immune from suit, they would have clearly so stated.

In so holding, we find it was, therefore, error to dismiss Walters as a defendant in the instant case.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

OTT, Acting C. J., and DANAHY, J., concur.
No. 99-7558.

#### Walker *v.*Davis, Warden, et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             376
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,732
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     27,220
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         74,136
<ALLOWANCE>                                        820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 112,469
<DEPOSITS>                                      89,752
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,632
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,384
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 112,469
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,882
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,174
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   337
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,393
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,519
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,686
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,707
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       28
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 104
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,054
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    989
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         667
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       667
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.41
<LOANS-NON>                                        991
<LOANS-PAST>                                       154
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   884
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       92
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  820
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            820
        

</TABLE>
#### John DUNN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-274.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 14, 1971.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael N. Kavouklis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

HOBSON, Judge.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to a charge of aggravated assault and was sentenced to the maximum of five years imprisonment plus a three thousand dollar fine or an additional year in prison should he fail to pay the fine. Appellant: was found to be indigent and has been represented by the Public Defender throughout the lower and appellate court proceedings.

Appellant’s sole point on appeal is that Williams v. Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 90 S.Ct. 2018, 26 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970), requires that the part of his sentence providing that he must serve an additional year of imprisonment if he fails to pay the three thousand dollar fine be set aside because it constitutes an impermissible discrimination between defendants able and unable to pay a fine.

We agree. In Williams, *supra,*it was held:

> “ * * * We hold only that a State may not constitutionally imprison beyond the maximum duration fixed by statute a defendant who is *financially unable*to pay a fine, (emphasis ours)

See also Schreck v. State, Fla.App.1970, 240 So.2d 873, and Gary v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 523.

In the recent U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395, 91 S.Ct. 668, 28 L.Ed.2d 130 (1971), it was held:

> “We emphasize that our holding today does not suggest any constitutional infirmity in imprisonment of a defendant with the means to pay a fine who refuses or neglects to do so.”

*27Therefore, if appellant is not indigent at the expiration of his prison sentence this opinion does not prevent his incarceration for failure to pay his fine.

Accordingly, that portion of the sentence which provides that in default of payment of the three thousand dollar fine the appellant be imprisoned for an additional year is vacated.

The judgment and sentence as modified are affirmed.

LILES, A. C. J., and MANN, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Vion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December  31,  2006 (the ‘‘Report’’) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March  14, 2007

|        |  |  |                                          |
|--------|--|--|------------------------------------------|
|   |  |  | /s/ Howard B. Johnson                    |
|   |  |  | Howard B. JohnsonChief Financial Officer |
|        |

----
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment Outlook for Earth Scientists: Geologists, Geophysicists, Meteorologists, Oceanographers

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Employment Outlook for Earth Scientists: Geologists, Geophysicists, Meteorologists, Oceanographers : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1050*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1964,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4430,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER