alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                        View Systems, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of View Systems, Inc. certifies (the
"Company") pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(A)    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
       ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of
       Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(B)    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



Date: November 10, 2005
                            /s/ Gunther Than
                            ____________________________________
                            Gunther Than
                            Chief Executive Officer
                            Principal Financial Officer
No. 99-2008.

#### Houston, Warden *v.*Kilpatrick.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Lopez*v. *Davis, ante,*p. 230.
#### The CITIZENS & PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK OF PENSACOLA, a National Banking Corporation, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent.

No. DD-390.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 2, 1978.

Robert L. Stone of Harrell, Wiltshire, Stone & Swearingen, Pensacola, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Caroline C. Mueller, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for review is GRANTED and the order of the hearing officer is QUASHED. *State Dep’t of Revenue*v. *Miami Nat’l Bank,*354 So.2d 84 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

BOYER and SMITH, JJ., concur.

McCORD, C. J., concurring specially.

McCORD, Chief Judge,

concurring specially.

I concur in the foregoing opinion only because a majority of a panel of this Court decided the question here involved in *State Department of Revenue v. Miami National Bank,*354 So.2d 784 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Although I dissented from that opinion, the majority opinion is now the law of this Court.
# Uradni list C 168I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 168I |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 645. maj 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 168I

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 645. maj 2021

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Sporočila |
| | SKUPNE IZJAVE |
| | Evropski parlamentSvet |
| 2021/C 168 I/01 | Skupna izjava Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o financiranju sklopa Vrednote Unije v letu 2021 | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

II   Sporočila

SKUPNE IZJAVE

Evropski parlamentSvet

2021/C 168 I/01

Skupna izjava Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o financiranju sklopa Vrednote Unije v letu 2021

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

II Sporočila

SKUPNE IZJAVE

Evropski parlament Svet

| 5.5.2021 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CI 168/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2021

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CI 168/1

---

Skupna izjava Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o financiranju sklopa „Vrednote Unije“ v letu 2021

(2021/C 168 I/01)

Brez poseganja v pristojnosti proračunskega organa se sozakonodajalca strinjata, da bi bilo treba za sklop „Vrednote Unije“ v okviru programa za državljanstvo, enakost, pravice in vrednote od 1. januarja 2021 zagotoviti znatna sredstva.

Sozakonodajalca pozivata Komisijo, naj sprejme ustrezne ukrepe za dosego tega cilja, zlasti za oceno uporabe instrumentov prilagodljivosti v okviru pravnega okvira letnega proračuna EU za leto 2021 v skladu z merili za aktiviranje, določenimi v uredbi o večletnem finančnem okviru.

---
Order filed July 30, 2013 

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

___________

NO. 01-12-01138-CR

 01-12-001139-CR

 01-12-01140-CR

 01-12-01141-CR

____________

JEROME GOODY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1339911, 1339912, 11339913, 11339914

ORDER
This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of sealed exhibits.

The clerk of the 178th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this 

court the original of sealed exhibits, on or before August 6, 2013. The Clerk of this 

court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver 

it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of 

inspection, to return the original of sealed exhibits, to the clerk of the 178th 

District Court.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 10.10


UNICITY
Network




January 3,2002

Mr. Patrick Millsap
Imagenetix. Inc.
16935 West Bernardo Road, Suite #101
San Diego. California 92127

Re:     Contract Modification

Dear Patrick,

     You have requested a modification to the contract for the supply oil CM
Plex TM by Imagenetix, Inc. to Unicity NetworkTM (the Contract). The
modification it to correct clerical errors in the original Contract. The changes
are as follows:

     *    Page 1, 2 paragraph: CeladrinTM is replaced with CM P1ex.

     *    Appendix C: Exterior Contents: 20 mg Gelatin is replaced with Exterior
          Contents: 120 mg Gelatin.

     All other terms and conditions of the contract shall remain the same.

     If you are agreeable to this modification, please sign below and return
this letter to me at your convenience.

Best regards.

/s/  Kim Hayes
------------------
     Kim Hayes
     Vice President Supply Chain Management
     The Enrich Corporation


Imagenctix. Inc. agrees to the forgoing changes.



By:  /s/  Patrick Millsap                        Date:   01-07-02
-----------------------------                         -------------
          Patrick Millsap, Vice President
254 La. 1104

#### Donald Henry EARL v. Honorable Warren W. COMISH, Judge 21st Judicial District Court, State of Louisiana, et al.

No. 50247.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 19, 1969.

In re: Donald Henry Earl applying for writs of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writs refused. As is disclosed by the attached instruments, this entire matter is now moot.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49264-49265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24916]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Hosting of Information at World Wide Web Site Currently at 
FedWorld, Except for Agency Government Information Locator System 
(GILS)

    Notice is hereby given that effective October 1, 1997, the Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin hosting at its World Wide Web 
(WWW) site (http://www.nrc.gov) agency information currently posted on 
the FedWorld bulletin board system at the

[[Page 49265]]

National Technical Information Service. NRC information at FedWorld 
will no longer be updated and maintained after that date, except for 
the NRC Government Information Locator System (GILS). GILS will be 
maintained at FedWorld until October 1, 1998.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of September 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
A.J. Galante,
Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-24916 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-U
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00350-CV

In re Leah Hayes

T. Y. J., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY 

NO. D-1-FM-16-005029

THE HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R T O S H O W C A U S E

PER CURIAM

This is a contempt proceeding ancillary to the appeal of T. Y. J. The subject of 

this proceeding is court reporter Leah Hayes, who has failed to comply with this Court’s order to 

file the reporter’s record.

On June 5, 2018, we ordered Hayes to file the record by June 15, 2018, and 

cautioned her that failure to file the record by that date could require her to show cause why she

should not be held in contempt of court. 

Therefore, it is hereby ordered that Leah Hayes shall appear in person before this 

Court on Tuesday, July 3, 2018, at 1:30 p.m., in the Third Court of Appeals courtroom, located 

on the first floor of the Price Daniel, Sr. Building, 209 West 14th Street, in Austin, Travis 
County, Texas, to show cause why she should not be held in contempt and have sanctions 

imposed for her failure to obey our June 5, 2018 order. This order to show cause will be 

withdrawn and Hayes will be relieved of her obligation to appear before this Court as ordered 

above if the Clerk of the Court receives the complete reporter’s record on or before 10:00 a.m. 

on Monday, July 2, 2018.

It is ordered on June 19, 2018.

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ERIC HOUSTON, #16891-074,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:15cv63-WS/CAS

P.A. ZIMMERMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, sought to initiate a civil rights action in this Court on

February 9, 2015. Plaintiff submitted a § 1983 complaint, doc. 1, but did not submit in

forma pauperis motion. However, review of the complaint reveals that Plaintiff is a

federal prisoner who is incarcerated in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania as are all named

Defendants in this case. Doc. 1 at 2. 

Plaintiff's complaint is nearly illegible, just as his prior submissions have been. In

January 2015, Plaintiff submitted two cases to this Court, case no. 4:15cv10 and case

no. 4:15cv11. Report and Recommendations are pending in both of those cases,

recommending transfer to Pennsylvania. Review of this case indicates that the event or

issue Plaintiff intends to litigate must also have taken place in Pennsylvania. This Court

Case 4:15-cv-00525-MWB-JVW Document 3 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

does not have jurisdiction over parties in Pennsylvania. The appropriate forum for this

action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 118(b) is in the United States

District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Lewisburg Division. 

A federal district court has the authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to transfer a

case to another district or division "in which it could have been brought." The Court may

also raise the issue of defective venue sua sponte. Lipofsky v. New York State Workers

Comp. Bd., 861 F.2d 1257, 1259 (11th Cir. 1988) (stating "a district court may raise on

its own motion an issue of defective venue or lack of personal jurisdiction; but the court

may not dismiss without first giving the parties an opportunity to present their views on

the issue.") 

In light of the foregoing, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and 1406(a), the

undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS transfer of this action to the United States

District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Lewisburg Division, for all further

proceedings, including instructions for Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or submit an in

forma pauperis motion, if he is not barred by § 1915(g) from doing so.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on February 12, 2015.

 S/ Charles A. Stampelos 

CHARLES A. STAMPELOS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed

factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:15cv63-WS/CAS

Case 4:15-cv-00525-MWB-JVW Document 3 Filed 02/12/15 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2853 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary 

of Labor to conduct a study and issue a report on grant programs 

to support the nursing workforce. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2023 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself, Mr. BRAUN, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

and the Secretary of Labor to conduct a study and 

issue a report on grant programs to support the nursing 

workforce. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Train More Nurses 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 2853 IS

1 SEC. 2. REVIEW OF AND REPORT ON PROGRAMS SUP2 PORTING THE NURSING WORKFORCE. 

3 The Secretary of Health and Human Services and the 

4 Secretary of Labor, jointly, shall— 

5 (1) conduct a review of all grant programs car6 ried out by the Department of Health and Human 

7 Services or the Department of Labor that support 

8 the nurse workforce; and 

9 (2) not later than 1 year after the date of en10 actment of this Act, submit to Congress a report on 

11 the review under paragraph (1) that includes rec12 ommendations for changes to such grant programs 

13 to improve upon the goals of— 

14 (A) increasing nurse faculty, particularly 

15 in underserved areas; 

16 (B) providing pathways for nurses who 

17 have more than 10 years of clinical experience 

18 to become faculty at schools of nursing; and 

19 (C) encouraging and increasing the nurs20 ing pipeline through pathways for licensed prac21 tical nurses to become registered nurses. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
**EXHIBIT 99.6****COMMENTS BY AUDITORS FOR U.S. READERS ON CANADA — U.S. REPORTING DIFFERENCES**To the Board of Directors of Agrium Inc.:In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatoryparagraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there is a change in accounting principles thathas a material effect on the comparability of the Company’s financial statements, such as thechange described in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2007 and forthe years then ended. Our report to the shareholders dated February 27, 2008 is expressed inaccordance with Canadian reporting standards, which do not require a reference to such a change inaccounting principles in the auditors’ report when the change is properly accounted for andadequately disclosed in the financial statements.*Signed “KPMG LLP”*Chartered Accountants
Exhibit
31.1


CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Billy M. Dodson, certify that:




1.           I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ministry Partners Investment
Company, LLC (the “Company”);




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Company and we have:




(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;




(b)           Intentionally
omitted;




(c)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation;




(d)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter (the
Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
material affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's
internal control over financial reporting; and




5.           The
Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and the Audit Committee of the Company's managers (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):




(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
      March 29, 2010
            By: /s/ Billy M.
      DodsonBilly
      M. DodsonPresident
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23768]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-4168-000]


Griffin Energy Marketing, L.L.C., Notice of Filing

September 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 12, 1997, Griffin Energy Marketing, 
L.L.C. tendered for filing an original Market Rate Sales and Resale 
Transmission Tariff and Code of Conduct and requested the standard 
authorizations and waivers to operate as a power marketer. Griffin 
requested waiver of any regulations that may be required to permit this 
tariff to become effective on October 12, 1997. Sixty (60) days from 
the date of filing.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 2046, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before September 16, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make the 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23768 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24872]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RM95-9-003]


Open Access Same-Time Information System and Standards of 
Conduct; Notice of Extension of Time for Filing Report on OASIS Phase 
II Requirements

September 15, 1997.
    On September 12, 1997, the OASIS How Working Group (How Group) 
filed a letter requesting that the Commission extend the due date for 
submittal of a report on OASIS Phase II requirements. The How Group 
requests that the report, previously due on or before September 19, 
1997, now be due on or before October 31, 1997.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ This report originally was due on or before August 4, 1997. 
The due date was extended to September 19, 1997, in a notice issued 
on July 11, 1997.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The How Group explains that an extension until October 31, 1997 is 
required because: (1) The Commercial Practices Working Group has joined 
the effort to co-author the report, thus necessitating greater 
coordination efforts; and (2) it hopes to elicit additional public and 
industry input on the draft report, through surveys, comments and 
workshops, in the intervening time.
    After consideration of the How Group's letter, the requested 
extension of time, for filing the OASIS Phase II report, is hereby 
granted.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24872 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2192 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2192

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on thiophanate-methyl 
                     fungicide 70% wettable powder.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 2006

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on thiophanate-methyl 
                     fungicide 70% wettable powder.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THIOPHANATE-METHYL FUNGICIDE 70% WETTABLE POWDER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.79 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2008''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Consent of Independent Auditors











	Exhibit 10(b)



	CONSENT OF SIDLEY AUSTIN BROWN  & WOOD LLP



	We hereby consent to the reference to our
firm included in Part A and Part B of
the Registration Statement on Form N-1A of Master Large Cap Series Trust.



	/s/ Sidley Austin Brown  & Wood LLP          



	New York, New York 

      January 30, 2002