alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1)     | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)     | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material                respects the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                      |           |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
|   |                                                                                                      | /s/ Weibing Lu |
|   | Weibing                LuChief                Executive OfficerDated: August                13, 2007 |

----
----

|   | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Oconee Financial Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 16, 2011 | /s/ B. Amrey Harden             B. Amrey HardenChief Executive Officer                                                                     |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| Dated: May 16, 2011 | /s/ Steven A. Rogers                        Steven A. RogersChief Financial Officer |
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                ORGANIZED UNDER
DOMESTIC SUBSIDIARIES                                                                               LAWS OF
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  --------------------
<S>                                                                                           <C>
InSoft, Inc.................................................................................  Delaware
Paper Software, Inc.........................................................................  New York
 
<CAPTION>
 
FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                                           <C>
Netscape Communications (Japan), Ltd........................................................  Japan
Netscape Communications S.A.................................................................  France
Netscape Communications Ireland Limited.....................................................  Ireland
Netscape Communications Limited.............................................................  United Kingdom
Netscape Communications Gmbh................................................................  Germany
Netscape Communications Canada Inc..........................................................  Canada
Netscape Communications Limited.............................................................  Hong Kong
Netscape Communications Singapore re Pte. Ltd...............................................  Singapore
Netscape Communications Australia Pty Limited...............................................  Australia
Netscape Communications (Schweiz) AG........................................................  Switzerland
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statement Nos. 333-48692 and 333-26117 on Form S-8 of ourreport dated March 27, 2006, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofPoore Brothers, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

 
| */s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE  LLP* |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
|                             |
| Phoenix, Arizona                 |
| March 27, 2006                   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2146 Referred in House (RFH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2146

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2006

             Referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To extend relocation expenses test programs for Federal employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RELOCATION EXPENSES TEST PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 5739 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``for a period not to 
        exceed 24 months''; and
            (2) in subsection (e), by striking ``7 years'' and 
        inserting ``11 years''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as though enacted as part of the Travel and Transportation 
Reform Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-264; 112 Stat. 2350).

            Passed the Senate August 1, 2006.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOptimization methods applied to hybrid vehicle designThe use of optimization methods as an effective design tool in the design of hybrid vehicle propulsion systems is demonstrated. Optimization techniques were used to select values for three design parameters (battery weight, heat engine power rating and power split between the two on-board energy sources) such that various measures of vehicle performance (acquisition cost, life cycle cost and petroleum consumption) were optimized. The apporach produced designs which were often significant improvements over hybrid designs already reported on in the literature. The principal conclusions are as follows. First, it was found that the strategy used to split the required power between the two on-board energy sources can have a significant effect on life cycle cost and petroleum consumption. Second, the optimization program should be constructed so that performance measures and design variables can be easily changed. Third, the vehicle simulation program has a significant effect on the computer run time of the overall optimization program; run time can be significantly reduced by proper design of the types of trips the vehicle takes in a one year period. Fourth, care must be taken in designing the cost and constraint expressions which are used in the optimization so that they are relatively smooth functions of the design variables. Fifth, proper handling of constraints on battery weight and heat engine rating, variables which must be large enough to meet power demands, is particularly important for the success of an optimization study. Finally, the principal conclusion is that optimization methods provide a practical tool for carrying out the design of a hybrid vehicle propulsion system.Document ID19840011117Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsDonoghue, J. F.*(Cleveland State Univ. OH, United States)*Burghart, J. H.*(Cleveland State Univ. OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1983Subject CategoryUrban Technology And TransportationReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-168292NAS 1.26:168292DOE/NASA/0084-1Accession Number84N19185Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: DE-AI01-77CS-51044CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-84PROJECT: RTOP 778-36-06Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840011117.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JASON LEE,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13-10517

D.C. No.

3:09-cr-00193-CRB-1

ORDER

Filed May 27, 2016

Before: Carlos T. Bea, Sandra S. Ikuta,

and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed on May 6, 2016, available at ECF

No. 51 and at 2016 WL 2638364, is hereby amended:

On page 11, the phrase <, abrogated on other grounds by

Moncrieffe v. Holder, 133 S. Ct. 1678 (2013)> is removed.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JODI LA COE, : No. 4:14-cv-01818

:

Plaintiff, : (Judge Brann)

:

v. :

:

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE :

UNIVERSITY, MEHRDAD :

HADIGHI, and JAMES KALSBEEK, :

:

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 24th day of March 2016, in accordance with the 

accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT

Defendant James Kalsbeek’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 30, is GRANTED IN 

FULL and WITH PREJUDICE.

BY THE COURT:

/s Matthew W. Brann

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

Case 4:14-cv-01818-MWB Document 40 Filed 03/24/16 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 183 (Monday, September 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25260]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, October 8, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Floor Conference 
Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-25260 Filed 9-18-97; 2:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### Athel L. LEVERETT, Appellant, *v.*Warren THOMAS, Roger West, Jack Forehand, John Griner, and Paul Akin, as members of and constituting the Civil Service Board of Duval County, Florida, Appellees.

No. K-490.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Aug. 19, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 19, 1969.

Mahon and Mahon, Jacksonville, for appellant.

William L. Durden, Jacksonville, David U. Tumin, and Chester G. Senf, Jacksonville, for appellees.

JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment denying appellant’s petition for writ of certiorari, entered by the Circuit Court of Duval County.

The petitioner was an employee of the Board of Public Instruction of Duval County, Florida, at the time of his suspension for theft of certain material belonging to the Board of Public Instruction. He was suspended first for IS days, then for 30 days. Before the latter 30 days had expired, the Board of Public Instruction withdrew the latter suspension and requested he return to work. Petitioner worked one day and was again suspended for 30 days with a final discharge effective at the end of the 30 days. After the last suspension notice, the petitioner appealed to the Civil Service Board of Duval County, where it was urged by petitioner that he was being subjected to double jeopardy. The Civil Service Board affirmed the discharge of petitioner ; and petition for certiorari was filed in the Circuit Court, wherein, inter alia, it was urged that either the doctrine of res adjudicata or estoppel by judgment, or the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy should bar the Board of Public Instruction from its action in discharging the petitioner.

The Circuit Court, Hon. Martin Sack, wrote a lengthy and comprehensive final judgment wherein he dealt with each of the points raised, and we think correctly decided each point adversely to the petitioner.

We fail to find that the appellant has demonstrated any error in the trial court’s final judgment, and therefore, the same is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K, and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHAEL WILLIAMS, : Civil Action No. 4:15-00675

:

:

Plaintiff, : (Judge Brann)

:

v. :

:

INFLECTION ENERGY, LLC, U.S. :

WELL SERVICES, LLC and U.S. :

WELL SERVICES, INC., :

:

Defendants. :

ORDER

August 19, 2015

AND NOW, in accordance with the Memorandum of this same date, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Inflection Energy, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF 

No. 28) is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s Matthew W. Brann

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

Case 4:15-cv-00675-MWB Document 40 Filed 08/19/15 Page 1 of 1
#### DiVINCENTI BROTHERS, INC. v. LIVINGSTON PARISH SCHOOL BOARD.

No. 61827.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 31, 1978.

In re: Livingston Parish School Board, applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Livingston. 355 So.2d 1.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gerald MANNING.

No. 62010.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 14, 1978.

In re: Gerald Manning applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Parish of Ouachita.

Writ denied (on the showing made).
Case 05-02467-MBM Doc 23 Filed 11/17/05 Entered 11/18/05 13:51:04 Desc Main

Document Page 1 of 9
Case 05-02467-MBM Doc 23 Filed 11/17/05 Entered 11/18/05 13:51:04 Desc Main

Document Page 2 of 9
Case 05-02467-MBM Doc 23 Filed 11/17/05 Entered 11/18/05 13:51:04 Desc Main

Document Page 3 of 9
Case 05-02467-MBM Doc 23 Filed 11/17/05 Entered 11/18/05 13:51:04 Desc Main

Document Page 4 of 9
Case 05-02467-MBM Doc 23 Filed 11/17/05 Entered 11/18/05 13:51:04 Desc Main

Document Page 5 of 9
Case 05-02467-MBM Doc 23 Filed 11/17/05 Entered 11/18/05 13:51:04 Desc Main

Document Page 6 of 9
Case 05-02467-MBM Doc 23 Filed 11/17/05 Entered 11/18/05 13:51:04 Desc Main

Document Page 7 of 9
Case 05-02467-MBM Doc 23 Filed 11/17/05 Entered 11/18/05 13:51:04 Desc Main

Document Page 8 of 9
Case 05-02467-MBM Doc 23 Filed 11/17/05 Entered 11/18/05 13:51:04 Desc Main

Document Page 9 of 9
256 La. 78

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Rubin DAVIS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 50602.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 1970.

In re: Rubin Davis applying for writ of habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000836 19-NOV-2013 10:47 AM

SCWC-12-0000836 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I
MAYDENE I. SIMMONS, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs. AQUA HOTELS AND RESORTS, INC., a Foreign Profit Corporation; KAI MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC, dba KAUAI BEACH RESORT, a Domestic Limited Liability Company; JOHN DOES 1-10 and JANE DOES 1-10, Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000836; CIV. NO. 11-1-0059) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.) Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Maydene I. Simmons’ application for writ of certiorari filed on October 10, 2013, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, November 19, 2013. Clayton Ikei and Jerry Chang, for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Stefan Reinke and Malia Schreck, for respondents /s/ Simeon A. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack
Exhibit 10.10

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$268,665.00                                                    Las Vegas, Nevada

FOR VALUE  RECEIVED,  Crest  View Inc.  (hereinafter  referred  to as  "Maker"),
promises  to pay to the order of Anthony  Conforti  (hereinafter  referred to as
"Holder"),  PO Box 4970,  Albuquerque,  NM 87196,  or at such  other  address as
Holder may  designate in writing,  the  principal sum of Two Hundred Sixty Eight
Thousand  Six  Hundred  Sixty Five  ($268,665.00)  until  paid,  at the rate six
percent (6%) per annum.

The principal amount of the note shall be due and payable on or before September
18, 2002.

Should the  amount  owing on this note not be paid when due,  the entire  unpaid
principal sum evidenced by this Note will,  without notice to the Maker,  become
due and payable.

Maker  hereby  waives  presentment  of payment,  protect  and demand,  notice of
protest,  demand and dishonor and nonpayment of this Note, and consents that the
holder may extend the time of payment or  otherwise  modify the terms of payment
or any part or whole of the  indebtedness  evidenced by this Note as the request
of any other person liable hereon,  and consent shall not alter nor diminish the
liability of any party hereunder.

Maker may repay the indebtedness  evidenced hereby in whole or in part from time
to time without premium or penalty.

As used herein,  Holder shall include any subsequent  holder of this Note. Maker
shall have no right to assign this Note without the consent of Holder, and in no
event shall any  assignment  of this Note by Maker act to release maker from any
obligations hereunder unless such release is evidenced in writing by Holder.

This Note shall be governed by the laws of the State of Nevada.

Witness the hand of the undersigned this 18th day of September, 2001.


                                       Crest View Inc.



                                       By:          /s/ John C. Francis
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      John C. Francis
                                          Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
#### Billy W. McCROY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-257.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Oct. 10, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Judson Luther HOBBY, Relator, v. Tom WADDELL, Jr., Circuit Judge, 18th Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida, in and for Seminole County, Respondent.

No. 69-461.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 20, 1969.

Mack N. Cleveland, Jr., of Cleveland & Mize, and Albert N. Fitts, Sanford, for relator.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Upon the filing of a Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition, we issued a Rule Nisi and upon a response being filed set this matter for oral argument. Having heard oral argument and considered the briefs, we conclude that the Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition should be denied and the Rule Nisi discharged.

CROSS, C. J., and WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       ORGANIZED UNDER LAWS
DOMESTIC SUBSIDIARIES                                                           OF
---------------------------------------------------------------------  --------------------
<S>                                                                    <C>
Collabra Software, Inc...............................................  Delaware
InSoft, Inc..........................................................  Delaware
Netcode Corporation..................................................  California
Paper Software, Inc..................................................  New York
 
FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Netscape Communications (Japan), Ltd.................................  Japan
Netscape Communications S.A..........................................  France
Netscape Communications Ireland Limited..............................  Ireland
Netscape Communications Limited......................................  United Kingdom
Netscape Communications Gmbh.........................................  Germany
Netscape Communications Canada Inc...................................  Canada
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24273]



[[Page 48290]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Toxicology Program


Notice of Establishment

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 
U.S.C. Appendix 2), the Director, National Toxicology Program (NTP), 
announces the establishment of the Advisory Committee on Alternative 
Toxicological Methods by the Secretary, DHHS.
    The Committee will advise the NIEHS Interagency Center for the 
Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods and the Director of the 
Environmental Toxicology Program on the activities and directives both 
present and future, as they relate to the Center, including advice on 
fostering interactions with all stakehoders.
    Duration of this Committee is continuing unless formally determined 
by the Secretary, DHHS, that termination would be in the best public 
interest.

    Dated: September 4, 1997.
Kenneth Olden,
Director, National Toxicology Program.
[FR Doc. 97-24273 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M