Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 188 / Monday, September 29, 1997 / Rules and Regulations 50861

Table 1 to paragraph (a)(1)(iv)—

Continued

Column A variety

Column B

maturity

guide

Fayette .......................................... I

Fire Red ........................................ I

First Lady ...................................... D

Flamecrest .................................... I

Flavorcrest .................................... G

Flavor Queen ................................ H

Flavor Red .................................... G

Franciscan .................................... G

Goldcrest ...................................... H

Golden Crest ................................ H

Golden Lady ................................. F

Honey Red .................................... G

John Henry ................................... J

July Elberta ................................... C

July Lady ...................................... G

June Lady ..................................... G

June Pride .................................... J

June Sun ...................................... H

Kearney ........................................ I

Kern Sun ....................................... H

Kingscrest ..................................... H

Kings Lady .................................... I

Kings Red ..................................... I

Lacey ............................................ I

Mary Anne .................................... G

May Crest ..................................... G

May Lady ...................................... G

May Sun ....................................... I

Merrill Gem ................................... G

Merrill Gemfree ............................. G

O’Henry ......................................... I

Pacifica ......................................... G

Parade .......................................... I

Pat’s Pride .................................... D

Prima Lady ................................... J

Prime Crest ................................... H

Queencrest ................................... G

Ray Crest ...................................... G

Red Cal ......................................... I

Red Dancer (Red Boy) ................. I

Redglobe ...................................... C

Redhaven ..................................... G

Red Lady ...................................... G

Redtop .......................................... G

Regina .......................................... G

Rich Lady ...................................... J

Rich May ....................................... H

Rio Oso Gem ................................ I

Royal Lady .................................... J

Royal May ..................................... G

Ruby May ..................................... H

Ryan Sun ...................................... I

Scarlet Lady .................................. F

September Sun ............................. I

Sierra Crest .................................. H

Sierra Lady ................................... I

Sparkle .......................................... I

Springcrest .................................... G

Spring Lady .................................. H

Springold ....................................... D

Sugar Lady ................................... J

Summer Lady ............................... L

Summerset ................................... I

Suncrest ........................................ G

Topcrest ........................................ H

Tra Zee ......................................... J

Willie Red ..................................... G

Table 1 to paragraph (a)(1)(iv)—

Continued

Column A variety

Column B

maturity

guide

Zee Lady ....................................... L

Note: Consult with the Federal or FederalState Inspection Service Supervisor for the

maturity guides applicable to the varieties not

listed in this table.

(v) If a grower or handler believes his/

her fruit is meeting the appropriate

maturity level but the fruit has not been

so graded by the inspector, he/she may

appeal the inspection by calling the

officer-in-charge of the local FederalState Inspection Service office to

arrange for an on-site examination of the

fruit.

* * * * *

(b) During the period April 1 through

June 30 of each fiscal period, no handler

shall handle any package or container of

any variety of peaches not specifically

named in paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(3) or

(a)(4) of this section unless:

* * * * *

(c) During the period July 1 through

October 31 of each fiscal period, no

handler shall handle any package or

container of any variety of peaches not

specifically named in paragraphs (a)(2),

(a)(3) or (a)(4) of this section unless:

* * * * *

(e) Container tolerances. The contents

of individual packages in the lot are

subject to the following limitations,

provided the averages for the entire lot

are within the tolerances specified in

this part:

(1) For packages which contain more

than 10 pounds, and a tolerance of 10

percent or more is provided, individual

packages shall have not more than one

and one-half times the tolerance

specified. For packages which contain

more than 10 pounds and a tolerance of

less than 10 percent is provided,

individual packages shall have not more

than double the tolerance specified.

(2) For packages which contain 10

pounds or less, individual packages are

not restricted as to the percentage of

defects.

* * * * *

Dated: September 18, 1997.

Robert C. Keeney.

Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division.

[FR Doc. 97–25410 Filed 9–26–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410–02–U

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 97–NM–63–AD; Amendment

39–10147; AD 97–20–10]

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; de Havilland

Model DHC–8–100, –200, and –300

Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a

new airworthiness directive (AD),

applicable to certain de Havilland

Model DHC–8–100, –200, and –300

series airplanes, that requires

modification of the attitude and heading

reference systems (AHRS). This

amendment is prompted by a report of

loss of power to both AHRS’s during

flight due to a faulty terminal block to

which the signal ground for the AHRS’s

are connected. The actions specified by

this AD are intended to prevent

simultaneous power loss to both

AHRS’s, which could result in reduced

controllability of the airplane.

DATES: Effective November 3, 1997.

The incorporation by reference of

certain publications listed in the

regulations is approved by the Director

of the Federal Register as of November

3, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The service information

referenced in this AD may be obtained

from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier

Regional Aircraft Division, Garratt

Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K

1Y5, Canada. This information may be

examined at the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), Transport

Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket,

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,

Washington; or at the FAA, New York

Aircraft Certification Office, Engine and

Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth Street,

Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York;

or at the Office of the Federal Register,

800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite

700, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Luciano Castracane, Aerospace

Engineer, Systems and Equipment

Branch, ANE–172, FAA, New York

Aircraft Certification Office, Engine and

Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth Street,

Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York

11581; telephone (516) 256–7535; fax

(516) 568–2716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A

proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal

Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
50862 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 188 / Monday, September 29, 1997 / Rules and Regulations

include an airworthiness directive (AD)

that is applicable to de Havilland Model

DHC–8–100, –200, and –300 series

airplanes was published in the Federal

Register on July 22, 1997 (62 FR 39194).

That action proposed to require

modification of the attitude and heading

reference systems (AHRS).

Interested persons have been afforded

an opportunity to participate in the

making of this amendment. No

comments were submitted in response

to the proposal or the FAA’s

determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

The FAA has determined that air

safety and the public interest require the

adoption of the rule as proposed.

Cost Impact

The FAA estimates that 173 de

Havilland Model DHC–8–100, –200, and

–300 series airplanes of U.S. registry

will be affected by this AD, that it will

take approximately 4 work hours per

airplane to accomplish the required

actions, and that the average labor rate

is $60 per work hour. Required parts

will cost approximately $10 per

airplane. Based on these figures, the cost

impact of the AD on U.S. operators is

estimated to be $43,250, or $250 per

airplane.

The cost impact figure discussed

above is based on assumptions that no

operator has yet accomplished any of

the requirements of this AD action, and

that no operator would accomplish

those actions in the future if this AD

were not adopted.

Regulatory Impact

The regulations adopted herein will

not have substantial direct effects on the

States, on the relationship between the

national government and the States, or

on the distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government. Therefore, in

accordance with Executive Order 12612,

it is determined that this final rule does

not have sufficient federalism

implications to warrant the preparation

of a Federalism Assessment.

For the reasons discussed above, I

certify that this action (1) Is not a

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44

FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3)

will not have a significant economic

impact, positive or negative, on a

substantial number of small entities

under the criteria of the Regulatory

Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has

been prepared for this action and it is

contained in the rules docket. A copy of

it may be obtained from the rules docket

at the location provided under the

caption ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation

safety, Incorporation by reference,

Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me by the

Administrator, the Federal Aviation

Administration amends part 39 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

part 39) as follows:

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS

DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

§ 39.13 [Amended]

2. Section 39.13 is amended by

adding the following new airworthiness

directive:

97–20–10 De Havilland, Inc.: Amendment

39–10147. Docket 97–NM–63–AD.

Applicability: Model DHC–8–100, –200,

and –300 series airplanes, certificated in any

category.

Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane

identified in the preceding applicability

provision, regardless of whether it has been

otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in

the area subject to the requirements of this

AD. For airplanes that have been modified,

altered, or repaired so that the performance

of the requirements of this AD is affected, the

owner/operator must request approval for an

alternative method of compliance in

accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD.

The request should include an assessment of

the effect of the modification, alteration, or

repair on the unsafe condition addressed by

this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not

been eliminated, the request should include

specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless

accomplished previously.

To prevent simultaneous power loss to

both attitude and heading reference systems

(AHRS), which could result in reduced

controllability of the airplane, accomplish

the following:

(a) Within 400 hours time-in-service after

the effective date of this AD, modify the

AHRS’s, in accordance with Bombardier

Alert Service Bulletin S.B. A8–34–117,

Revision ‘C’, dated February 14, 1997.

(b) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used if approved by the Manager, New York

Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA,

Engine and Propeller Directorate. Operators

shall submit their requests through an

appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance

Inspector, who may add comments and then

send it to the Manager, New York ACO.

Note 2: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the New York ACO.

(c) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199

of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to

a location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

(d) The modification shall be done in

accordance with Bombardier Alert Service

Bulletin S.B. A8–34–117, Revision ‘C’, dated

February 14, 1997. This incorporation by

reference was approved by the Director of the

Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be

obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier

Regional Aircraft Division, Garratt Boulevard,

Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada.

Copies may be inspected at the FAA,

Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind

Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the

FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office,

Engine and Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth

Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York;

or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800

North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,

Washington, DC.

(e) This amendment becomes effective on

November 3, 1997.

Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed

in Canadian airworthiness directive CF–97–

01R1, dated February 3, 1997.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on

September 19, 1997.

Vi L. Lipski,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 97–25416 Filed 9–26–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 97–ANE–15; Amendment 39–

10137; AD 97–19–17]

RIN 2120–AA64

Airworthiness Directives; General

Electric Company CT58 Series

Turboshaft Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a

new airworthiness directive (AD),

applicable to General Electric Company

CT58 series turboshaft engines, that

requires removal from service of certain

compressor rear shafts, initial and

repetitive inspections of specific critical

rotating parts, and replacement if found

cracked, until those parts are removed

from service and replaced with

improved design parts. This amendment

is prompted by a stage 2 turbine wheel