alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Consolidated  Financial  Statements found in the Company's Report on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended  December  31,  1999,  and is  qualified  in its  entirety by
reference to such Consolidated Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000943658
<NAME>              PORTLAND BREWING COMPANY

<S>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                          103,006
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   663,064
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      8,000
<INVENTORY>                                                     729,853
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              1,706,473
<PP&E>                                                       10,919,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                                4,208,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                8,616,274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         1,639,794
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           300,040
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                      7,662,882
<OTHER-SE>                                                  (3,172,542)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  8,616,274
<SALES>                                                      10,463,331
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              9,954,810
<CGS>                                                         7,221,743
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 7,221,743
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              3,715,313
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              249,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (1,280,147)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (1,280,147)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (1,280,147)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                      (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    (0.37)



</TABLE>
### Chemical quality of surface waters and sedimentation in the Saline River basin, Kansas

By: Paul Robert JordanB.F. JonesLester R. Petri

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1651

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48827-48828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24621]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP 92-154-001]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

September 11, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 8, 1997, Colorado Interstate Gas 
Company (CIG), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, Third Revised Sheet No. 369 to be effective 
October 15, 1997.
    CIG states that Sheet No. 369 was a tariff sheet authorized by 
Commission Order issued May 14, 1992 in Docket No. RP92-154-000. The 
tariff sheet identified customers' buyout-buydown obligation pursuant 
to Order No. 528.
    CIG states the filing is being made to ``clean up'' Sheet No. 369. 
One Buyer had elected to amortize its payment of its obligation over a 
60-month period. The 60-month payment period has terminated and the 
Buyer has paid its obligation; therefore, the filing reflects all 
Buyers have now paid their obligation pursuant to the authorization in 
Docket No. RP92-154-000.
    CIG states that copies of the filing have been sent to all parties 
in Docket No. RP92-154-000.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426 in accordance with the Sec. 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such protests must be 
filed in accordance with Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
determining the

[[Page 48828]]

appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make the 
protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of the filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in the 
Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24621 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2055 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2055

 To amend titles 10 and 14, United States Code, to provide for the use 
          of gold in the metal content of the Medal of Honor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 2005

   Mr. Kerry introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend titles 10 and 14, United States Code, to provide for the use 
          of gold in the metal content of the Medal of Honor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GOLD CONTENT FOR MEDAL OF HONOR.

    (a) Requirement for Gold Content.--Sections 3741, 6241, and 8741 of 
title 10, United States Code, and section 491 of title 14, United 
States Code, are each amended by inserting after ``appropriate 
design,'' the following: ``the metal content of which is 90 percent 
gold and 10 percent alloy and''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to any Medal of Honor awarded after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4757-4758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2393]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Notice of Issuance of Decisions and Orders During the Week of 
December 30, 1996, Through January 3, 1997

    During the week of December 30, 1996, through January 3, 1997, the 
decision and order listed below was issued with respect to an 
application for refund filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of 
the Department of Energy. This notice also contains a list of 
submissions that were dismissed by the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
    Copies of the full text of these decisions and orders are available 
in the Public Reference Room of the Office of Hearings and Appeals, 
Room 1E-234, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, 
Washington, D.C. 20585-0107, Monday through Friday, between the hours 
of 1:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m., except federal holidays. They are also 
available in Energy Management: Federal Energy Guidelines, a 
commercially published loose leaf reporter system. Some decisions and 
orders are available on the Office of Hearings and Appeals World Wide 
Web site at http://www.oha.doe.gov.

    Dated: January 23, 1997.
George B. Breznay
Director, Office of Hearings and Appeals.

Decision List No. 14

    Week of December 30, 1996, through January 3, 1997.

Refund Application

    The Office of Hearings and Appeals issued the following Decision 
and Order concerning a refund application, which is not summarized. A 
copy of the full text of the Decision and Order is available in the 
Public Reference Room of the Office of Hearings and Appeals.

County of Forsyth........................................  RC272-361 1/2/97                                     
                                                                                                                

Dismissals

    The following submissions were dismissed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Name                               Case No.        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gretchen Lee Coles...........................  VFA-0231                 
Kavanaugh Products, Inc......................  RK272-3335               
Westwood Shipping Lines......................  RG272-493                
Weherhaeuser Co..............................  RG272-494                
------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 4758]]

[FR Doc. 97-2393 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
No. 9032.

#### The Fraternal Mystic Circle et al. *v.*McMurray et al.

(Decided March 13, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Wayne county.

*Mr. G. J. Marriott*and *Mr. John McSweeney,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. H. B. Swartz*and *Mr. Mahlon Bouch,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

This certification set forth below is hereby madesolely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any otherpurposes.

In connection with the Annual Report of Ezenia! Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Khoa D. Nguyen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

| Date: March 31, 2006 | By:    | /s/ Khoa D. Nguyen        |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                      |   | Khoa D. Nguyen            |
|                      |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|                      |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,870,381
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,016,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (408,244)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,811,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,591,278
<PP&E>                                      84,110,712
<DEPRECIATION>                            (15,411,218)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             849,658,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       43,751,126
<BONDS>                                    546,450,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                 107,076,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               849,658,729
<SALES>                                      4,766,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            76,866,294
<CGS>                                       10,277,990
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               84,407,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,328,422)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          33,202,034
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (39,414,936)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (14,977,677)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (24,437,259)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (24,437,259)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (244,373)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (244,373)


</TABLE>
1. Gurley was released from confinement on August 26, 2004

and currently resides at 328 Oak Street, Pottstown, Pa. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOHN GURLEY, :

:

Plaintiff : No. 4:CV-04-0202

:

vs. : (Complaint Filed 01/28/04) 

:

ROBERT MOCZULSKI, et al., : (Judge Muir)

:

Defendants :

Order

July 12, 2005

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

Plaintiff, John Gurley, an inmate formerly confined in

the Mahanoy State Correctional Institution, Frackville,

Pennsylvania1 (“SCI-Mahanoy”), filed this civil rights action

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges a denial of

adequate medical treatment. Gurley seeks damages as well as

injunctive relief. On May 6, 2005, defendant, Dr. Robert

Moczulski, filed a motion for summary judgment, along with a

statement of material facts and supporting brief. (Doc. Nos.

29-32). Plaintiff's brief in opposition to this motion is

now long overdue and plaintiff has neither made an

Case 4:04-cv-00202-MM-DB Document 34 Filed 07/12/05 Page 1 of 3
2. By order dated January 29, 2004, this court directed the

parties' attention to the Local Rules of Court. (See Doc.

No. 4). The order referred specifically to an opposing

party's duty to file a brief in opposition to a motion

within fifteen (15) days after service of the movant's

brief. See M.D. Pa. Local Rule 7.6.

2

appropriate filing nor requested an extension of time in

which to do so. Thus, we will direct plaintiff to file a

brief in opposition.2 M.D. Pa. Local Rule 7.6.

Generally, a dispositive motion may not be granted merely

because it is unopposed. However, when a plaintiff fails to

prosecute or comply with a court order, the court may dismiss

the action pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure.

We will consider dismissing this case for failure to

prosecute and comply with a court order under the authority

of Rule 41(b) if plaintiff fails to oppose the motion or

otherwise communicate with the court within twenty (20) days

of the date of this order.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

Plaintiff shall file within twenty (20) days of the date

hereof a brief in opposition to defendant's motion. If

plaintiff fails to file a brief in opposition, we will

Case 4:04-cv-00202-MM-DB Document 34 Filed 07/12/05 Page 2 of 3
consider dismissing plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Rule

41(b) for failure to prosecute and comply with a court order.

 s/Malcolm Muir

 

MUIR

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-00202-MM-DB Document 34 Filed 07/12/05 Page 3 of 3
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ROO Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robin Smuth, Interim
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


August
        20, 2007
  */s/
        Robin Smyth*
 Robin
        Smyth
 Interim
        Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eddie RICHARDS.

No. 61146.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1978.

Barry F. Viosca, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Brian G. Meissner, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TATE, CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ, dissent.

*State v.*Jackson, 307 So.2d 604, 605 (La.1975) should be overruled and is here extended beyond its own holding.
#### ROBERT HITTEL, INC. v. BISCHOFF.

No. 38502.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
TBPLS Firm No. 10074302

February 11, 2016
U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Application to Amend Section 333 Exemption No. 12996 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-2777 Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to the Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the "Reform Act"), Westwood Professional Services, Inc (“Westwood”) seeks an amendment to our existing Section 333 Exemption. The FAA granted to Westwood an exemption via letter dated September 25, 2015. The letter was marked Exemption No. 12996, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-2777. Westwood requests that our Section 333 exemption be amended so the DJI Inspire 1 unmanned aircraft (“UA”) is added as an authorized UA. The Inspire 1 is widely used in the aerial photography and mapping industry and has been previously approved in past FAA Section 333 exemptions. The Inspire 1 specs can be found at: http://www.dji.com/product/inspire1/info#specs . No additional amendments or changes to Exemption No. 12996, other than the addition of the DJI Inspire 1 UA, are requested at this time.
Applicant information Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Contact: Chad Grismer 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Telephone: 952-937-5150 Email: chad.grismer@westwoodps.comPage 2

Thank you for considering Westwood’s amendment request. Please contact us if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Chad Grismer Senior Project Engineer
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**WRITTEN
      STATEMENT**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with this Quarterly Report of China 3C Group and its subsidiaries
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, Weidong Huang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




August
                11, 2008/s/
                Weidong HuangWeidong
                HuangChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer)