alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2146 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2146

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To extend relocation expenses test programs for Federal employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RELOCATION EXPENSES TEST PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 5739 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``for a period not to 
        exceed 24 months''; and
            (2) in subsection (e), by striking ``7 years'' and 
        inserting ``11 years''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as though enacted as part of the Travel and Transportation 
Reform Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-264; 112 Stat. 2350).

            Passed the Senate August 1, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2146

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To extend relocation expenses test programs for Federal employees.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          26,777
<SECURITIES>                                    19,709
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,148
<INVENTORY>                                      3,145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,976
<PP&E>                                          20,945
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,463
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,247
<BONDS>                                        120,956
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           252
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,018
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,473
<SALES>                                         27,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,632
<CGS>                                           22,133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,792
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,327
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,047)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,047)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,047)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.25)


</TABLE>
Helping People Help the Land

Conservation Activity Plan

Feed Management • April 2014

A feed management conservation 

activity plan is a site-specific strategy 

to help a landowner manage the 

quantity and quality of available 

nutrients required by livestock and 

poultry while improving feed efficiency. 

NRCS Technical Service Providers 

(TSPs) prepare these

plans using inputs such as:

• Evaluation of existing and 

 planned feeds and feedstuff

• Assessment of farm nutrient 

 balance

• Analyses of diets and manure 

 • Assessment of client objectives

Feed Management Conservation practices recommended 

by such a plan can include:

• Nutrient management

For more information, please visit 

www.nrcs.usda.gov and search for 

“Technical Service Providers.”
### Profile surveys in Hood and Sandy River basins, Oregon

By: Robert Bradford Marshall

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp348

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate- 1**                            (1476 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 1**                            (1211 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 1**                            (1232 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 2**                            (1398 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 2**                            (1304 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 2**                            (1223 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2605
MARY K. FISHER; CHARLES FRANCIS PATTERSON, Petitioners - Appellants, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. Nos. 95-6382, 95-6383, 95-6384) Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 28, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary K. Fisher, Charles Fr ancis Patterson, Appellants Pro Se. Loretta C. Argrett, John F. Nolet, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Stuart L. Brown, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellants Charles Patterson and Mary Fisher appeal from the tax court's decision finding a deficiency in Fisher's 1991 return, but no deficiency in Patterson's 1991 return or their 1992 joint return. We have reviewed the record and the tax court's opinion,and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Patterson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , Nos. 95-6382; 95-6383; 95-6384 (Tax Court Aug. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 1 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 2 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 3 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 4 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 5 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 6 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 7 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 8 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 9 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 10 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 11 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 12 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 13 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 14 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 15 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 16 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 17 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 18 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 19 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 20 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 21 of 22
Case 4:08-cv-01215-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/05/10 Page 22 of 22
```

[115th Congress Public Law 163]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 1251]]

Public Law 115-163
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To establish the Kennedy-King National Commemorative Site in the State 
   of Indiana, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Apr. 4, 2018 -  [H.R. 
                                4851]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Kennedy-King 
National Commemorative Site Act.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 54 USC 320101 note.>>  SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kennedy-King National Commemorative 
Site Act''.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.
            (2) Site.--The term ``Site'' means the Kennedy-King National 
        Commemorative Site as designated by section 3(a).
            (3) State.--The term ``State'' means the State of Indiana.
SEC. 3. NATIONAL COMMEMORATIVE SITE.

    (a) Designation.--The Landmark for Peace Memorial in Martin Luther 
King, Jr. Park in Indianapolis, in the State, is hereby designated as 
the Kennedy-King National Commemorative Site.
    (b) African American Civil Rights Network.--The Site shall be part 
of the African American Civil Rights Network established under Public 
Law 115-104.
    (c) Administration.--
            (1) Cooperative agreements.--The Secretary may enter into 
        cooperative agreements with appropriate public or private 
        entities for interpretative and educational purposes related to 
        the Site.
            (2) Effect of designation.--The Site shall not be a unit of 
        the National Park System.
            (3) Limitations.--Nothing in this Act--
                    (A) authorizes the Secretary to interfere with the 
                rights of any person with respect to private property or 
                any local zoning ordinance or land use plan of the State 
                or any political subdivision thereof; or

[[Page 132 STAT. 1252]]

                    (B) authorizes the Secretary to acquire land or 
                interests in land through condemnation or otherwise.

    Approved April 4, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4851:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115-612 (Comm. on Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 164 (2018):
            Mar. 19, considered and passed House.
            Mar. 22, considered and passed Senate, amended. House 
                concurred in Senate amendment.

                                  <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

APRIL LANKFORD, : Civil No. 3:23-CV-1106

:

Plaintiff :

:

 v. :

: (Magistrate Judge Carlson)

MARTIN O’MALLEY, :

Commissioner of Social Security, :

:

Defendant :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 11th day of December 2024, in accordance with the 

accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Clerk shall enter final judgment AFFIRMING the decision of the 

Commissioner of Social Security; and,

2. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.

s/Martin C. Carlson 

Martin C. Carlson

 United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:23-cv-01106-MCC Document 13 Filed 12/11/24 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DOLPHIN PRODUCTIONS, INC., (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



Date:  August 12, 2003


                                        /s/ Richard H. Casper

                                        -----------------------------
                                        Richard H. Casper
                                        Chief Executive Officer



                                       /s/ Pamela Lindquist

                                       -----------------------------
                                       Pamela Lindquist
                                       Chief Financial Officer
#### DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES (NOW SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SERVICES) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, State of Florida, Appellant, v. In the Interest of M. V. W., a child, Appellee.

No. FF-47.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 25, 1977.

Duane N. Ivester, Chester G. Senf, Eric J. Haugdahl, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Scott R. Nabors of Staats & Nabors, Panama City, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The order assessing costs and attorney’s fees against the Division of Family Services (now Social and Economic Services), Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, State of Florida, is reversed on authority of *J.E.R. v. State of Florida,*317 So.2d 89 (Fla. 1st. DCA 1975), and *Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, etc. v. R.M.A. et al.,*327 So.2d 844 (Fla. 1st. DCA 1976).

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48136-48137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19235]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of Business Meeting.

DATE AND TIME: Friday, August 16, 2013; 9:30 a.m. EST.

PLACE: 1331 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Suite 1150, Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Program Planning
     Vote to Approve and Adopt the Final Draft of the ``Civil 
Rights Implications of Eminent Domain Abuse'' report
     Vote to Approve and Adopt the Final Draft of the 
``Assessing the Impact of Criminal Background Checks and the Equal 
Employment Opportunity Commission's Conviction Records Policy'' report.
     Discussion & Vote on 2014 USCCR Business Meeting Calendar

[[Page 48137]]

     Discussion & Action on 2014 Statutory Enforcement Report 
topic
     Discussion on Submission of Statements & Rebuttals for 
Commission Reports
III. Management and Operations
     Staff Director's report
IV. Approval of State Advisory Committee Appointment Slates
     Maine
     Mississippi
     Rhode Island
     Tennessee
     Washington
     West Virginia
V. Adjourn Meeting

Contact Person For Further Information: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591.

    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact Pamela 
Dunston at (202) 376-8105 or at signlanguage@usccr.gov at least 
seven business days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

    Dated: August 5, 2013.
David Mussatt,
Acting RPCU Chief.
[FR Doc. 2013-19235 Filed 8-5-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 19, 2013

h0612

Order 

Clerk

June 19, 2013

146617

TAYLOR M. SEGARS,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 146617

COA: 310025

Oakland CC: 2011-122551-AA

BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF

MICHIGAN,

Respondent-Appellee.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Albert O. LaBONTE, Appellant, v. Margaret M. LaBONTE, Appellee.

No. 70-32.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 11, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Joseph P. Metzger, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# L_2011265EN.01003001.xml

| 11.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 265/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 265/30

---

Corrigendum to Decision 2010/703/EU of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 18 November 2010 appointing a Judge to the General Court

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 306 of 23 November 2010
  )

On page 76, signature:

for:

‘
  For the Council

The President

J. DE RUYT
  ’,

read:

‘
  The President

J. DE RUYT
  ’

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of Dave & Busters, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian A. Jenkins, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 14, 2010

/s/ Brian A. JenkinsBrian A. Jenkins Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Fred Willie STURGIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2268.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 4, 1970.

Rehearing Denied April 15, 1970.

*167Thomas J. Reddick, Jr., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

McCAIN, Judge.

Appellant, with three other negro males, Stubbs, Jones and Waye, was jointly indicted and jointly tried for the crime of rape, a verdict of guilty with recommenda-ation of mercy being returned against all.

Appellant’s main vituperation concerns the admission into evidence of statements by two of the co-defendants, Jones and Stubbs, which inculpated him.

Notwithstanding the court’s instruction to the jury to disregard these statements in evaluating the case against appellant, our review of the record is required to determine if this error is rendered harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Bruton v. United States, 1968, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476; Roberts v. Russell, 1968, 392 U.S. 293, 88 S.Ct. 1921, 20 L.Ed.2d 1100; and Harrington v. California, 1969, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284.

The victim established that four negro males committed the rape but she could not identify them.

Neither appellant nor the co-defendants testified. Appellant’s written statement, admitted into evidence, placed him at the scene, implicated the co-defendants but did not admit to any sexual act on his part. At one place in the statement he referred to putting on his clothes but elsewhere stated:

> “Q. How many times, to your knowledge, was the girl assaulted and how many times did each of you assault her?

> “A. I guess she was assaulted about, maybe ten, eleven times by Dan and Bo-Bo.

> *«*jjj *%*

> “Q. Before you went to the beach or after you committed the sex act?

> “A. A — , After we had committed the sex act. After they had.”

Stubbs’ written confession was not admitted but testimony of his statements while in custody were received; however, these were of limited nature. The typewritten transcript by co-defendant Jones, both admitted into evidence and read to the jury, was a confession in complete de*168tail fully incriminating himself and the others, including appellant, in the rape. This confession was hardly cumulative and could have caused substantial impact on the jury.1

Applying the *Harrington*test, i. e., has harmless error been demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt, this case cannot pass, and we must conclude reversible error was committed.

This cause is reversed and remanded for a new trial consistent with the views herein expressed.

Reversed and remanded.

REED and OWEN, JJ„ concur.

1

. See Stubbs v. State, Fla.App.1969, 222 So.2d 228, and Jones v. State, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 326.
#### FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF IUKA v. MISSISSIPPI STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION.

No. 45436.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 13, 1969.

Smith & Downs, Corinth, for appellant.

Finch & Finch, Clark & Clark, Iuka, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Ex parte Virginia R. CRAWLEY.

77-468.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 19, 1978.

FAULKNER, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.