alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Jesse Sutton, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Majesco Entertainment Company; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: January 17, 2012



|                 |  |                              
|---------------- |  | -----------------------------
|/s/ Jesse Sutton
|Title:           |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                 |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit - 10.31
        Amendment to Shuffle Master, Inc. Outside Directors' Option Plan
                            Effective March 28, 2001


                                  AMENDMENT TO
                              SHUFFLE MASTER, INC.
                         OUTSIDE DIRECTORS' OPTION PLAN
                            EFFECTIVE MARCH 28, 2001


         The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Shuffle Master, Inc. a
Minnesota corporation (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify that effective as
of the 28th day of March, 2001, the following resolution was adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Corporation in accordance with the applicable
provisions of Minnesota law:

Resolution Amending Outside Directors' Option Plan, as amended, (the "Plan")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

         RESOLVED, that the undersigned, the members of the Board of Directors
of the Corporation, pursuant to Section 10 of the Plan and the applicable
provisions of Minnesota law, hereby resolve that Section 5 of the Plan be
amended by deleting the existing Section 5. (02) in its entirety and replacing
it with the following new section 5. (02):

          "(02) Exercise Price. The exercise price of an Option granted pursuant
         to Section 5. (01) (a) or (b) shall be 100% of the value of the Stock
         on the grant date determined in accordance with Section 6 hereof. The
         exercise price of an Option granted under Section 5. (01) (c) shall be
         such price as determined by the Board of Directors at the time it makes
         the grant, including a price which can be determined on the basis of
         future events."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name this 28th day of
March, 2001.

                                        /s/ Joseph J. Lahti
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Joseph J. Lahti, Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1942 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1942

  To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-Methoxy-2-propanol in solvent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 1, 2005

 Mrs. Lincoln introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on 1-Methoxy-2-propanol in solvent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 1-METHOXY-2-PROPANOL IN SOLVENT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.38.12      1-Methoxy-2-        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         propanol in                                                        31/2009
                         solvent (CAS No.
                         107-98-2)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3812.30.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Winston S. HALL, as the duly appointed and acting Guardian of the property of Winston Shelley Hall, Jr., and Gregory Hall, minors, Appellant, v. The HERTZ CORPORATION, a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, William K. Cash and Charles H. Denny, III, Appellees.

No. O-18.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 8, 1971.

Rehearing Denied May 7, 1971.

Ayres, Swigert, Cluster & Tucker, Ocala, for appellant.

Boyd, Jenerette, Leemis & Staas, Jacksonville, and Chandler, O’Neal, Carlisle, Avera, Gray & Lang, Gainesville, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Hopkins v. Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, 201 So.2d 743 (Fla.1967), and Messinger v. Tom, 203 So.2d 357 (Fla.App.2d 1967).

RAWLS, Acting C. J., WIGGINTON, J., and GOODFRIEND, SAM, Associate Judge, concur.
#### Sidney P. LIPKINS, Appellant, v. BISCAYNE CRYSTAL CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-410.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 19, 1971.

Kline, Moore, Klein & Herron, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Myers, Kaplan, Porter, Levinson & Ken-in, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ., and DUVAL, HARVIE S., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Sidney Lipkins appeals from an adverse final judgment in an action in which he sought to accelerate an indebtedness due him on a note given by the defendant, Biscayne Crystal Corporation, and to foreclose the mortgage which has been given as security for the note.

The final judgment made extensive findings of fact and denied the acceleration of the note and foreclosure of the mortgage.

The final judgment is supported by substantial competent evidence and is affirmed. See Becker v. City Trust Co., 102 Fla. 682, 136 So. 642 (1931); Jaudon v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States, 102 Fla. 782, 136 So. 517; Gus’ Baths, Inc. v. Lightbown, 101 Fla. 1205, 133 So. 85 (1931); Kreiss Potassium Phosphate Co. v. Knight, 98 Fla. 1004, 124 So. 751 (1929); Lieberbaum v. Surfcom-ber Hotel Corp., Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 28; and 59 C.J.S. Mortgages § 495(6) (a).

Affirmed.
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Robert A. SCOTT, Respondent.

No. 38370.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1, 1969.

Robert B. Kane, Tallahassee, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

Richard Altshuler, Miami, for respondent.

CARLTON, Justice.

We have for review the following judgment of the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar:

> “This cause came on for consideration by the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar upon the report of its duly appointed- referee and the record of proceedings before him.

> “After trial, the referee found that the respondent received trust funds in the amount of $33,389.76 from his clients known as The Police Home Foundation Syndicate. Respondent was retained for the purpose of arranging for the conveyance of certain real estate to his clients. The respondent paid himself a $2,000 attorney’s fee which was 10 times greater than the fee to which he was entitled. In addition to this, he unlawfully withheld from his clients trust funds in the amount of $6,401.84 which he converted to his own use.

> “The referee further found that the respondent was informed against for grand larceny and pleaded guilty to said charge in the Court of Record in Brevard County. He was found guilty of grand larceny by said court and sentenced to prison for a term of six months to two years. The referee found said conduct to violate the Integration Rule and the canons of Professional Ethics, and recommended that he be disbarred. The Board of Governors concurs in the referee’s findings and recommendations. It is, therefore,

> “ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the respondent be disbárred and that he pay the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $340.85.

> “DONE and ORDERED this 1st day of March, 1969.”

Respondent does not contest the judgment, but instead submits that it should be set aside until completion of rehabilita*196tion proceedings which apparently are currently pending.

We agree with counsel' for The Bar that disbarment is warranted and that our judgment to that effect should not be withheld merely because rehabilitation proceedings have been initiated by respondent. Disbarment and rehabilitation are procedurally independent and should not be considered simultaneously except for the most pressing reasons.

However, while we are not now directly concerned with respondent’s alleged rehabilitation, we do think it advisable to require that the proceedings pending before the referee regarding rehabilitation be completed within forty-five (45) days after the filing of this opinion. Further, we think it is necessary that the referee should complete his report to the Board of Governors with all possible speed for their prompt consideration.

The judgment of the Board of Governors is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and THORNAL, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: August 15, 2014

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Ray Saracino, EPA

SUBJECT: August 7, 2014 Meeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on August 7, 2014 to 

discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The Clean Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Hawaii Officials:

Gary Gill Deputy Director, HDOH

Nolan Hirai Clean Air Branch Manager, Hawaii State Department of Health (HDOH) 

Mark Glick Director, Hawaii Energy Office, Department of Business, Economic 

Development and Tourism (DBEDT)

Hermina Morita Chair, Public Utilities Commission (PUC)

Maria Tome Engineering Section Chief, PUC

Jacqueline Kozak-Thiel Governor’s Office

Veronica Rocha Renewable Energy Project Manager, DBEDT

Robert Mould DBEDT

Thomas Gorak Chief Counsel, PUC

Michael Madsen Engineer, Clean Air Branch, HDOH 

Keith McFall HDOH

EPA

Jeremy Mark OAP, Clean Air Markets Division

Chris Sherry OAP, Climate Change Division 

Matt Clouse OAP, Climate Protection Partnership Division

Erika Wilson OAP

Jim Ketcham-Colwill Office of Policy Analysis and Review

Joe Bryson OAP, Climate Protection Partnership Division

Amy Vasu Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Misha Adamantiades Advisor

Deborah Jordan Director, R9 Air Division

Kerry Drake Associate Director, R9 Air Division

Amy Zimpfer Associate Director, R9 Air Division
Ben Machol Chief, Clean Energy & Climate Change Office

Dean Higuchi R9, PICO

Anita Lee R9

Ray Saracino R9
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Sandra
J.  Andre,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: August 11, 2006



                                        By: /s/ SANDRA J. ANDRE
                                            ___________________________
                                                Sandra J. Andre
                                                President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 181 (Thursday, September 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24828]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY

Agency For International Development


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is making 
efforts to reduce the paperwork burden. USAID invites the general 
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment 
on the following proposed and/or continuing information collections, as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Comments are requested 
concerning: (a) Whether the proposed or continuing collections of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether information shall have practical utility; 
(b) the accuracy of the burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance the 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) 
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the 
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology.

DATES: Send comments on or before September 30, 1997.

ADDRESS INFORMATION TO: Mary Ann Ball, Bureau of Management, Office of 
Administration Services, Information and Records Division, U.S. Agency 
for International Development, Washington, D.C. (202) 712-1765 or via 
e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="69242b080505293c3a28202d472e061f47">[email protected]</a>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    OMB Number: OMB 0412-0551.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Title: U.S. Agency for International Development Acquisition 
Regulations (AIDAR) Clause 752.70.26 Reports.
    Type of Submission: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Purpose: Section 635(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act (FAA) 
authorizes USAID to contract with any corporation, international 
organization, or other body or persons in or out of the United States 
in furtherance of the purposes and within the limitations of the FAA. 
To determine how well contractors are performing to meet the 
requirements of the contract, USAID requires periodic performance 
reports from contractors. The performance reporting requirements are 
contained in the USAID clause New AIDAR reports (October 1996).
    Annual Reporting Burden: Respondents: 350. Total annual responses: 
2,000. Total annual hours requested: 8,000.

    Dated: September 11, 1997.
Willette L. Smith,
Acting Chief, Information and Records Division, Office of 
Administrative Services, Bureau of Management.
[FR Doc. 97-24828 Filed 9-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Hydrologic conditions near Glendo, Platte County, Wyoming

By: G. E. WelderEdwin P. Weeks

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1791

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Hydrologic conditions in the Horseshoe Creek Valley near Glendo, Platte County, Wyoming(1960)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Cite as 2014 Ark. 409

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. CR-14-742

ISRAEL TODD WATSON

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered October 2, 2014

MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK;

REMANDED TO THE CIRCUIT

COURT FOR FINDINGS OF FACT

ON ATTORNEY ERROR;

CLERK DIRECTED TO ACCEPT

APPEAL.

PER CURIAM

Israel Todd Watson, by and through his attorney, Darrell F. Brown, has filed a motion

for rule on clerk. On September 19, 2013, the circuit court entered a judgment and

commitment order. Watson timely filed a notice of appeal on October 2, 2013. On

December 18, 2013, the circuit court granted Watson until April 19, 2014, to file the

transcript. At that time, although Watson would later be found to be indigent, family

members had arranged to pay $3,332.40 for what they believed was the full cost of preparing

the record. However, upon attempting to pick up the transcript prior to the deadline for

lodging the record, they learned that an additional $2,798.50 was due. 

When it became apparent that Watson could secure no more private funds, he

successfully petitioned to be declared indigent. Although, pursuant to Arkansas Rule of

Appellate Procedure–Criminal 4(c) (2013), Watson’s transcript was due no later than May 2,

2014, on April 28, 2014, the circuit court entered an order extending the deadline for filing
Cite as 2014 Ark. 409

the record until August 19, 2014. The motion was untimely under Arkansas Rule of

Appellate Procedure–Criminal 4(c), and the circuit court’s assigned deadline also did not

comport with the rule. 

In McDonald v. State, 356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004), we said that there are only

two possible reasons for an appeal not being timely perfected: either the party or attorney

filing the appeal is at fault, or there is good reason. Id. at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891. When it

is plain from the motion, affidavits, and record that relief is proper under either rule based on

error or good reason, the relief will be granted, and if there is attorney error, a copy of the

opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. See id.

In the matter before us, the motion and record do not plainly reveal whether fault on

the part of Thompson’s attorney caused the failure to timely file a complete record. 

Therefore, we direct the clerk to accept the appeal and remand the issue of attorney fault to

the circuit court to make findings of fact so that this court may make a decision on attorney

error. Moore v. State, 359 Ark. 370, 197 S.W.3d 447 (2004).

Remanded.

2
PROMISSORY NOTE



PROMISSORY NOTE

U.S.$2,663,544Dated: December 18, 2001

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Avion Holdings Inc. ("Avion") of, 2949 Palmerston Avenue, West Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V7V 2X2, promises to pay to A. Richard Bullock (herein called "Bullock") of, 19 Ferguson Drive, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT4 2AZ, or any subsequent holder of this promissory note, the principal amount of Two Million Six Hundred Sixty Three Thousand Five Hundred Forty Four ($2,663,544) Dollars of lawful money of the United States, in accordance with the following:




	Principal amount - The principal amount of this Promissory Note is U.S. $2,663,544.


	Interest - There is no interest bearing on the principal amount outstanding on this Promissory Note.


	Payment - The principal amount shall be payable after repayment of the CDN $1 million transferable promissory note by one-half of the net after-tax cash proceeds from the sale of Sun Power Corporation shares purchased from A. Richard Bullock pursuant to an agreement dated December 18, 2001, and the remainder, if any, shall be paid on the date that is ten years plus one day from the date of the Share Purchase Agreement between Avion and Bullock, being December 19, 2011.


	Assignment - This Promissory Note is assignable by Bullock with written notice of that assignment to Avion at the address of Avion given above.


	Payment - The payment of any amounts due under this Promissory Note shall be made in such places as agreed to by Avion and Bullock, and failing such agreement, at the address of Bullock given above from time to time by Bullock to Avion.


	Governing Law - This Promissory Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Province of British Columbia.



AVION HOLDINGS INC.

/s/ Kenneth F. Swaisland

By: 

Authorized Signatory
#### Ignacio MENDOZA, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY et al., Appellees.

No. 76-1469.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 19, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 24, 1977.

William Huggett, Miami, for appellant.

Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Knight and Gregor M. Gaebe, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in *Hettenbaugh v. Keyes-Ozon-Fincher Insurance, Inc.,*147 So.2d 328 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962).