alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1**CEO CERTIFICATION**     I, Zhenggang Wang, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sun Oil & Gas Corp.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 

 
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   December 2, 2005 /s/ Zhenggang Wang     Zhenggang Wang  Chairman of the Board &  Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                         0000943323
<NAME>                        TRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS FUNDING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos                
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      936
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   936
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 145,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              936
<BONDS>                                        145,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   145,936
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,475
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

<FN>
<F1>  Includes gaming, lodging, food & beverage and other.
<F2>  Includes general & administration and depreciation & amortization.

</FN>
        

</TABLE>
|  | (1) | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods      indicated. |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      16, 2009    |   | /s/ Weibing      Lu     |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                                                      |   | Weibing      Lu                   |
|                                                      |   | Chief      Executive Officer      |
|                                                      |   | (Principal      ExecutiveOfficer) |

----
**Exhibit 18.2**

December 20, 2007 

BWAY Corporation 

8607Roberts Drive 

Suite 250 

Atlanta, Georgia 30350 

Dear Sirs: 

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of BWAYCorporation as of September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, and for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2007, included in your Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issuedour report thereon dated December 20, 2007, which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph concerning the change in accounting principle for substantially all inventories and the adoption of Statement of FinancialAccounting Standards No. 158, *Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans*. Note 3 to such consolidated financial statements contains a description of your adoption during the year endedSeptember 30, 2007 of the change in the method of accounting from the lower of cost or market using the last-in, first-out method to the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out method for substantially all inventories. In ourjudgment, such change is to an alternative accounting principle that is preferable under the circumstances. 

Yours truly, 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia
#### Matty J. CORTES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-472.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 4, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 20, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>                               1
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from The
Med-Design Corporation and subsidiaries Consolidated Statement of Operations for
the year ended December 31, 1996 and balance sheet as at December 31, 1996 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                 DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                         1,648,639
<SECURITIES>                                                   6,173,746
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               7,919,846
<PP&E>                                                         1,424,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   183,510
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 9,349,162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          6,985,209
<BONDS>                                                          300,366
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                          68,996
<OTHER-SE>                                                     1,994,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   9,349,162
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       0
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               400,649
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (4,322,869)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (4,322,869)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (4,322,869)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     (0.63)
        


</TABLE>
No. 00-7226.

#### Huberty *v.*United States.

C. A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied.
#### Lawrence Robert RAYMOND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-3.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 11, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Okeechobee County; D. C. Smith, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LAWRENCE LOMBARDI, :

:

Plaintiff :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-05-300

:

MICHAEL PUGH, ET AL., :

: (Judge McClure)

Defendant :

ORDER

November 29, 2006 

Background

This pro se civil rights action was initiated by Lawrence Lombardi

(“Plaintiff”), an inmate presently confined at the United States Penitentiary,

Lewisburg, Pennsylvania (“USP-Lewisburg”). Plaintiff seeks compensatory and

punitive damages on the grounds that the Defendants were deliberately indifferent

to his medical needs. 

By Memorandum and Order dated January 17, 2006, Defendant Lawrence

Case 4:05-cv-00300-JFM-SF Document 54 Filed 11/29/06 Page 1 of 3
1

 Doctor Schiffmann is a physician who provided prisoners at Plaintiff’s former

place of confinement, the Allenwood United States Penitentiary, White Deer,

Pennsylvania (“USP-Allenwood”), with treatment on a contractual basis.

2

 The Federal Defendants are the following officials at USP-Allenwood: exWarden Michael Pugh, Health Services Administrator Ron Laino, Unit Manager

Angel Levi, Warden and Troy Williamson. 

3 In response to the remaining Defendants’ motion, Plaintiff has submitted a

motion requesting leave to file an amended complaint. See Record document no. 49.

2

Schiffman, D.O.’s motion to dismiss was granted.1 On March 8, 2006, the Federal

Defendants’ summary judgment motion was granted in part.2

 On March 28, 2006,

remaining Defendants Laino, Levi, and Williamson filed an answer to the

complaint. Thereafter, on April 14, 2006, the remaining Defendants filed a

motion for judgment on the pleadings.3

 See Record document no. 41.

Presently pending is the remaining Defendants’ motion for a protective

order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26©. See Record document no.

45. The motion requests that the remaining Defendants be granted a stay of their

obligation to respond to the Plaintiff’s pending discovery requests pending

resolution of their pending motion for judgment on the pleadings.

The motion for protective order will be granted, the remaining Defendants

are relieved from responding to Plaintiff's discovery requests until thirty (30) days

after resolution of their motion for judgment on the pleadings and Lombardi’s

Case 4:05-cv-00300-JFM-SF Document 54 Filed 11/29/06 Page 2 of 3
3

motion to amend, if necessary. Consequently,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The remaining Defendants’ motion for a protective order

(Record document no. 45) is GRANTED.

2. The remaining Defendants may file responses to Plaintiff’s

outstanding discovery requests within thirty (30) days

following resolution of their motion for judgment on the

pleadings and Plaintiff’s motion to amend. 

 s/ James F. McClure, Jr. 

JAMES F. McCLURE, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 4:05-cv-00300-JFM-SF Document 54 Filed 11/29/06 Page 3 of 3
# Diario Oficial C 104I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 104I |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 64.° año26 de marzo de 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 104I

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

64.° año26 de marzo de 2021

---

| Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Información |
| | INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA |
| | Comisión Europea |
| 2021/C 104 I/01 | Notas explicativas de la nomenclatura combinada de la Unión Europea | 1 |

Sumario

Página

IV   Información

INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA

Comisión Europea

2021/C 104 I/01

Notas explicativas de la nomenclatura combinada de la Unión Europea

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

IV Información

INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LAS INSTITUCIONES, ÓRGANOS Y ORGANISMOS DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA

Comisión Europea

| 26.3.2021 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CI 104/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2021

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CI 104/1

---

Notas explicativas de la nomenclatura combinada de la Unión Europea

(2021/C 104 I/01)

De conformidad con el artículo 9, apartado 1, letra a), del Reglamento (CEE) n.o 2658/87 del Consejo (1), las notas explicativas de la nomenclatura combinada de la Unión Europea (2) se modifican como sigue:

En la página 369,

en la nota explicativa de la subpartida 8543 70 90, se suprime el segundo párrafo.

En la página 416,

en la nota explicativa del punto 9506 69 90, se suprimen los párrafos segundo y tercero, y se sustituyen por el texto siguiente:

«Sin embargo, esta subpartida excluye las denominadas “pelotas antiestrés”, que tienen forma de pelota y pueden estar decoradas de distintas maneras. Suelen ser de plástico o caucho y están diseñadas para apretarse repetidamente en la mano como ejercicio antiestrés. Las “pelotas antiestrés” y “artículos antiestrés” similares, de diversas formas y diseños, se clasifican en la partida 9503.».

---

(1)  Reglamento (CEE) n.o 2658/87 del Consejo, de 23 de julio de 1987, relativo a la nomenclatura arancelaria y estadística y al arancel aduanero común (DO L 256 de 7.9.1987, p. 1).

(2)  DO C 119 de 29.3.2019, p. 1.

---
August 25, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

HARDRIDERS MOTORCYCLE CLUB ASSOCIATION, HARDRIDERS 

MOTORCYCLE CLUB FORT BEND COUNTY CHAPTER, HARDRIDERS 

MOTORCYCLE CLUB BRAZORIA COUNTY CHAPTER, HARDRIDERS 

MOTORCYCLE CLUB LAFAYETTE CHAPTER, HARDRIDERS 

MOTORCYCLE CLUB GALVESTON COUNTY CHAPTER, HARDRIDERS 

MOTORCYCLE CLUB BEAUMONT CHAPTER, EFREM SEWELL, MILO 

SHEPARD, THOMAS MEEKS, JOSEPH GUILLORY, AND TONY THOMAS, 

Appellants

NO. 14-14-00234-CV V.

HARDRIDERS, INC., WAVERLY NOLLEY, AND SHANNON MAYFIELD, 

Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, HardRiders, 

Inc., Waverly Nolley, and Shannon Mayfield, signed December 26, 2013, was 

heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no 

error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellants, Hardriders Motorcycle Club Association, Hardriders 

Motorcycle Club Fort Bend County Chapter, Hardriders Motorcycle Club Brazoria 

County Chapter, Hardriders Motorcycle Club Lafayette Chapter, Hardriders 

Motorcycle Club Galveston County Chapter, Hardriders Motorcycle Club 

Beaumont Chapter, Efrem Sewell, Milo Shepard, Thomas Meeks, Joseph Guillory, 

and Tony Thomas, jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

OFFICE OF
INSPECTOR GENERAL

March 11, 2013

Chairman and Commissioners Committee on Oversight and Government
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Reform
100 F Street, NE United States House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20549 2157 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515

Committee on Homeland Security and Darrell E. Issa, Chairman

Governmental Affairs Elijah Cummings, Ranking Member
United States Senate
340 Dirksen Senate Office Building Gene L. Dodaro
Washington, DC 20510 Comptroller General of the United States
Thomas R. Carper, Chairman U.S. Government Accountability Office
Tom Coburn, Ranking Member 441 G Street, NW

Washington, DC 20548
Jeffrey Zients, Acting Director
Office of Management and Budget
1650 Pennsylvania Avenue
Room 216
Washington, DC 20503

Inspector General’s Report of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Fiscal
Year 2012 Compliance with the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Office of Inspector General
(OIG) has completed its review of the SEC’s compliance with the Improper Payments
Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010 (IPERA) for fiscal year 2012 (FY), in accordance with
IPERA and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum M-11-16.

We conducted interviews with officials in the Office of Financial Management
regarding the SEC’s risk assessment under IPERA, and we reviewed the relevant disclosure in
the FY 2012 Agency Financial Report (AFR). SEC’s risk assessment determined that none of
its programs and activities are susceptible to significant improper payments at or above the
threshold levels that have been set by OMB. Significant erroneous payments are defined as
annual erroneous payments in program exceeding both $10 million and 2.5 percent or $100
million of total annual program payments. Further, the SEC determined that implementing a
payment recapture program which does not administer grant, benefit or loan programs, is not
cost-effective. In addition, the AFR states that although the SEC determined that
implementing a payment recapture program is not cost-effective, it nonetheless strives to
recover overpayments that are identified through other sources. We also reviewed the SEC’s


IPERA Risk Assessment Summary Report dated September 11, 2012 and its supporting
documentation to substantiate the agency’s compliance with IPERA and the accuracy of
improper payment amounts that were reported in the AFR.

Based on our review of information we determined that the SEC is in compliance with
IPERA for FY 2012.

If I can provide you with any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me
at (202) 551-6061 or via email at hoeckerc@sec.gov.

Sincerely,

Chore

Carl W. Hoecker

Inspector General

Office of Inspector General

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

ce: Jeffrey Heslop, Chief Operating Officer, Office of the Chief of Operations
Kenneth A. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer, Office of Financial Management
#### William M. HOSKINS, Petitioner, v. ACME INSURANCE ADJUSTORS, Phoenix of Hartford Insurance Company, and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38380.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1, 1969.

Steve M. Watkins of Truett & Watkins, Tallahassee, and Reid & Heth., St. Peters-burg, for petitioner.

Charles A. Zinn and Richard G. Davis, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings & Evans, Tampa, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 24, 1969.

After hearing oral argument, and after consideration of the petition, the record and the briefs, we conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

It is further ordered that the petitioner’s petition for allowance of attorney’s fees, be and the same is hereby denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.