alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07

- 12

- 0430

- CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
OCTOBER 18 , 2012

______________________________

PATRICK MORGAN, APPELLANT
V. HONORABLE FELIX KLEIN, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 154 TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMB COUNTY; NO.4182; HONORABLE FELIX KLEIN, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Patrick Morgan, an inmate, filed this appeal from the trial court's denial of a “B ill
of review. ” By letter dated October 4, 2012 , this Court advised Mr. Morgan that a filing fee of $175 was overdue and also noted that failure to make payment within ten days might result in dismissal of the appeal. Appellant has not responded, paid the filing fee, or made other arrangements for the discharge of the clerk’s filing fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 12.1(b).2 Unless a party is excused from paying a filing fee, the Clerk of this Co urt is required to collect filing fees set by statute or the Supreme Court when an item is presented for filing. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 5 and 12.1(b). Although the filing of a notice of appeal invokes this Court ’ s jurisdiction, i f a party fails to follow the prescribed rules of appellate procedure, the appeal may be dismissed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.1(b).

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with a directive from this Court requiring action within a specifie d time. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c).

Patrick A. Pirtle Justice
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 10:16 AM

To: 'studio@hot.rr.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Information: Ca mera Artistry Photography (Docket No.
FAA-2015-1293)



### July 27, 2015

Dear Mr. Letzer:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-1295). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make, mode l, and type (i.e., fixed-wing, roto rcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description shoul d include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by August 10, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
#### STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Gordon J. LANE, as personal representative of the Estate of Donald Bruce Lane, Sr., Appellee.

Nos. 77-70 and 77-252.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 31, 1978.

*463Frank W. Weathers of Weathers & Nark-ier, P. A., West Palm Beach, for appellant,

Edna L. Caruso of Montgomery, Lytal, Reiter, Denney & Searcy, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.,*252 So.2d 229 (Fla.1971).

ALDERMAN, C. J., and DAUKSCH, J., and GREEN, OLIVER L., Associate Judge, concur.
#### Ex parte Jimmy Tate RALEY and Janet McLain Flowers.

SC 2800.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 18, 1977.

BEATTY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES and SHORES, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24092]



[[Page 47801]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-127-000]


Cove Point LNG Limited Partnership; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

September 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 2, 1997, Cove Point LNG Limited 
Partnership (Cove Point LNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following proposed changes 
to be effective October 1, 1997.

Second Revised Sheet No. 5
Second Revised Sheet No. 6
Third Revised Sheet No. 7

    Cove Point LNG states that the listed tariff sheets set forth the 
adjustment to its rates applicable to the Annual Charge Adjustment 
(ACA), pursuant to the Commission's Regulations and Section 23 of the 
General Term and Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1.
    Cove Point LNG states further that the Commission's revised ACA 
rate per Dth for 1997 is $0.0022. The adjusted ACA Unit Surcharge will 
be billed for the fiscal year commencing on October 1, 1997.
    Cove Point states that the copies of the filing were served upon 
Cove Point LNG's affected customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of Cove Point LNG's filings are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24092 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Order entered February 10, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01544-CR

BRANDY NICHOLE CROWE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-34211-X

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

We abated the appeal for the appointment of new counsel. On January 30, 2020, the trial 

court notified us that Juanita Edgecomb had been appointed. We DIRECT the Clerk to list 

Juanita Edgecomb as appointed counsel for appellant and to send all future notices to her 

attention.

The supplemental reporter’s record containing State’s exhibits 11, 12, 13, and 14 is due 

February 12, 2020. Once it is filed, we will notify the parties of the briefing deadlines.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Jeanine Howard, 

Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 6; Debi Harris, deputy court reporter, Criminal 

District Court No. 6; and counsel for all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CHRISTY LYNN YINGST, : Civil No. 3:23-CV-430

:

Plaintiff, :

:

 v. : (Magistrate Judge Carlson)

:

MARTIN O’MALLEY, :

Commissioner of Social Security :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum 

opinion, IT IS ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner denying this 

claim is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner to conduct 

a new administrative hearing pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). IT IS FURTHER 

ORDERED that final judgment should be entered in favor of the plaintiff and against 

the Commissioner of Social Security.

So ordered this 6th day of December 2024.

S/Martin C. Carlson 

Martin C. Carlson

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:23-cv-00430-MCC Document 17 Filed 12/06/24 Page 1 of 1
### SERVED: JANUARY 22, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC In The Matter Of: LIBERTY FOUNDATION, INC. Respondent ) ) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2012-0477
Case No. 2011 GL-03-0070

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION FORA ONE-WEEK EXTENSION OF TIME OnJanuary 14, 2014 an Order Reserving Ruling onMotionto Continue and Directing the Parties to File Supplemental Materials was filed. On January 22, 2014 the Respondent filed Respondent's Motionto for [sic] Enlargement ofTime ofOne WeektoRespond to Order Reserving Ruling onMotion to Continue, Etc [sic]. In this Motion, the Respondent noted that it hadjustreceived the January 14, 2014 Order onJanuary 21, 2014, because the Office ofHearings staffhad mailed and faxed the January 14, 2014 Orderto the Respondent's old address, instead of to the Respondent's current address ofrecord. The Respondent also had conferred with the FAA about its Motion for More Time, but the FAA had not offered any position on the Respondent's motion. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.218, and after reviewing all relevant caselaw, decisions, regulation, statutory authority, motions, pleadings, and being fully advised; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

### 1. The Respondent's January 22, 2014 Motion for a one-week extension oftime to file supplemental materials is granted
.. 2. The Respondent's and the FAA's deadlines ofJanuary 29, 2014 to file
· supplemental materials, as directed in the January 14, 2014 Order, is extended to

February 5, 2014.

Attachment: Service List(
FDMS No. FAA-2012-0477 (Civil Penalty Action) SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

### ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration1 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591
· Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000

Mr. Christopher Stevenson Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel P.O. Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAJ<: 404-305-5223 Mr. Stuart A. Goldstein Respondent's Counsel Stuart A. Goldstein, P.A. 7300 North Kendall Drive, Suite 380 Miami, FL 33156 TEL: 305-670-1222 FAJ<: 305-670-7065 Judge J.E. Sullivan U. S. AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 

### ONE COPY

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: FederalAviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### Robert RIGBY v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50500.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 31, 1978.

Alton Massey, Kosciusko, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Pete J. Cajoleas, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Attala County; Clarence E. Morgan, Jr., Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and SUGG and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### David I. WEBB, Petitioner, v. Warren H. EDWARDS, Judge of the Criminal Court of Record, Division A, Orange County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-394.

District Court of Appeal of Florida Fourth District.

May 12, 1970.

Mandamus denied.
#### Leroy SWAW and Johnny Lee White v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50886.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 16, 1978.

W. Eugene Henry, Biloxi, G. William McCarthy, Jr., Ocean Springs, for appellants.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Wayne Snuggs, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and WALKER and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### Ex parte Jack MESSELT.

No. 77-39.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 10, 1977.

EMBRY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER and ALMON, JJ., concur.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the undersigned, Darren Holm, Chief Executive Officer of China Holdings, Inc, (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his  knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006  Of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.

Date:       September 6, 2007

/s/Darren Holm-------------------------Darren HolmChief Executive Officer

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the undersigned, Dempsey Mork, Chief Financial Officer of China Holdings, Inc, (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to hisknowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006  of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  September 6, 2007

/s/Dempsey Mork  -------------------------  Dempsey Mork  Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Richard A. PASS.

No. 62313.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: Richard A. Pass applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans.

Denied.

DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ., would grant the writ.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00261-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.Y., A CHILD §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 442nd District 

Court

of Denton County (20-1038-442)

February 18, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice 

Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Oconee Financial Corporation (the                “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”)                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                August 14, 2007 | /s/                B. Amrey Harden  B.                Amrey HardenChief                Executive Officer           |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             |                                                                                                                         |
| Dated:                August 14, 2007 | /s/                Jerry K. Wages    Jerry                K. WagesChief                Financial Officer |
#### Ruth Q. LEE, as Administratrix of the Estate of Ethel Q. Gorman, Deceased, Petitioner, v. MORRISON CAFETERIAS CONSOLIDATED, INC., a corporation, et al., Respondents.

No. 38187.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 12, 1969.

On Rehearing Feb. 11, 1970.

Richard P. Warfield, of Levin, Askew, Warfield, Graff & Mabie, Pensacola, for petitioner.

William Fisher, Jr., of Fisher, Hepner & Hertz, Pensacola, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After argument and upon further consideration, we have determined the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and MANN, District Court Judge, concur.

THORN AL, J., agrees to conclusion only.

DREW and CARLTON, JJ., dissent.

ON REHEARING GRANTED

PER CURIAM.

A rehearing having been granted in this cause and the case having been further considered upon the record and the briefs of the respective parties, the order dismissing the petition filed November 12, 1969 is hereby adhered to on rehearing.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and MANN, District Court Judge, concur.
The State of TexasAppellee



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 30, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00513

- CR

Marcos MELENDEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR7816

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The St ate ’ s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Time is extended

to January 21, 2015.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of December, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### Carl J. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, etc., Appellee.

No. 69-689.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 14, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
**Exhibit 99.8**

 

**Section 906Certification**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

*18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:*

 

In connection with this annual****report of VCampus Corporation on Form 10-K for theperiod ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on or about the date hereof, the undersigned, in his capacity and onthe date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

1.        This report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

 

2.        The information contained in this report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operation ofVCampus Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 
| Date: March 28, 2003 |                       |
|----------------------|----------------------------|
|                 |                       |
|                 |                       |
|                 | /s/ NARASIMHAN P. KANNAN   |
|                 | Narasimhan P. Kannan       |
|                 | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the "Form 10-Q/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. a  n d will be retained by Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities a  Date: January 21, 2011/s/ Cheung Wai Hung, EddieCheung Wai Hung, Eddie , Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                             DOMESTIC SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<S>                                           <C>
NAME                                          ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF
Actra Business Systems, LLC                   Delaware
Digital Style Corporation                     Delaware
KIVA Software Corporation                     California
Portola Communications, Inc.                  California
</TABLE>

                           INTERNATIONAL SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<S>                                           <C>
                  COUNTRY                                    OFFICIAL NAME
Australia                                     Netscape Communications Australia PTY
                                              Limited
Barbados                                      Netscape Communications FSC Incorporated
Brazil                                        Netscape Communications do Brasil Ltda.
Canada                                        Netscape Communications Canada, Inc.
Denmark                                       Netscape Communications Denmark A/S
European Headquarters                         Netscape Communications Europe SARL
France                                        Netscape Communications Societe Anonyme
Germany                                       Netscape Communications GmbH
Hong Kong                                     Netscape Communications Limited
Ireland                                       Netscape Communications Ireland Limited
Italy                                         Netscape Communications Italia SRL
Japan                                         Netscape Communications Japan, Ltd.
Netherlands                                   Netscape Communications Nederland B.V.
Spain                                         Netscape Internet Communications Espana.
                                              S.A.
Singapore                                     Netscape Communications Asia South Pte
                                              Limited
Sweden                                        NSCP Communications Sweden AB
Switzerland                                   Netscape Communications (Switzerland) Ltd.
United Kingdom                                Netscape Communications Limited
</TABLE>