alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HE .!iITORNEY GENERAL 

OF TEXAS 

Hon. R. S. Wyche 

County Auditor 

Gregg County .~ 

Longview, Texas 

Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-7330 

Re: Does the office of County Attorney exist In Gregg County? 

We have your recent letter requesting an opinion of 

this department upon the above stated question. 

House Bill Number 49, Chapter 23, Acts of the first 

called sesslon, 42nd Legislature, as amended by House Bill 

No. 226, Chapter 4, 44th Le islature, (Article 199, Subdivision 124, V.A.C.S., Texas 7 created and continued the office of resident Crlmlnal District Attorney of the 124th 

Judicial District. Gregg County alone constitutes the 124th 

Judicial District of the State of Texas. 

The Constltution of Texas, Article 5, Seclon 21, provides for the election of a County Attorney in the following 

language: 

"A county attorney, for counties in which there 

is not a resident criminal district attorney, shall 

be elected by the qualified voters of each county, 

who shall be commissioned by the Governor, and hold 

his office for the term of two years." (Emphasis ours) 

The Legfslature, by the Acts hereinbefore mentioned, 

having created and continued in existence the constitutional 

office of Criminal District Attorney for Gregg County, and 

in view of the above constitutional provision, which in effect provides that no County Attorney shall be elected In a 

County having a resident Crimlnal District Attorney, we respectfully answer your question in the negative. 

We think our opinion is supported by the case: Jones 

vs. Anderson, et al, Texas Civil Appeals, San Antonio, 1945, 

189 S.W. (2) 65, writ of error refused. This was a sutt for 

mandamus brought by Jones against the County Judge and County 

Commissioners of Bexar County to compel the Judge and Commissioners to canvass votes cast for Jones for the office of 
Hon. R. S. Wyche, page 2 O-7330 

County Attorney at the November 7, 1944, $eneral election, 

and to issue him a certificate of election to said office 

and further seeking a declaratory judgment invalidating the 

act of the Legislature which had therefore created the office of Criminal District Attorney of Bexar County. Jones 

attacked the Legislative Act upon the grounds that such Act 

was unconstitutional. The trial court refused Jones all 

relief~sought and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the 

trial court's judgment and upheld the constitutionality of 

the Legislative Act creating the office of Criminal District 

Attorney for Bexar County and further held that Article 5, 

Section 21 of the Texas Constitution prohibits the election 

of a County Attorney in a County having a resident Criminal 

District Attorney. 

Our negative answer to your first question disposes 

of your secondary questions. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

By s/Joe McCasland 

Joe McCasland 

Assistant. 

JMcC:djm:JMc:wc 

APPROVED OCT.24, 1946 

s/Grover Sellers 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

THIS OPINION CONSIDERED AND APPROVED IN LIMITFD CONFERENCE.
#### AMERICAN SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. Ed FARRIS and Ola Farris, Appellees.

No. M-202.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Jan. 15, 1970.

Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis, Pensacola, for appellant.

Levin, Askew, Warfield, Graff & Mabie, Pensacola, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Jacobs v. Automotive Repair Center, Inc. (Fla.App.1962) 137 So.2d 263; 32 Fla.Jur. 78, 92, Tender, §§ 2 and 9.

CARROLL, DONALD K„ Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48811]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24712]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[A-533-810]


Stainless Steel Bar From India, Notice of Extension of Time Limit 
for New Shipper Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit for new shipper antidumping 
duty administrative review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce is extending the time limit for the 
preliminary results for the new shipper administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar from India. The period of 
review is February 1, 1996, through January 31, 1997. The review covers 
two producers/exporters of the subject merchandise (i.e. Ferro Alloys 
Corporation Limited and Panchmahal Steels Limited). This extension is 
made pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Uruguay 
Round Agreements Act (``the Act'') and the Department's regulations as 
published in the Federal Register on May 11, 1995 (60 FR 25130).

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 17, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Yeske or Craig Matney, Import 
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
20230; telephone (202) 482-0189 or 482-0588, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') initiated this new shipper administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar from India on March 28, 
1997 (62 FR 14886). The current deadline for the preliminary results in 
September 16, 1997. Pursuant to 19 CFR 353.22 (h)(7), the Department 
has determined that this case is extraordinarily complicated and as 
such is extending the deadline for issuing the preliminary results. 
This extension is necessary to provide the Department additional time 
to consider the appropriate date of sale.
    In accordance with 19 CFR 353.22(h)(7), the Department will extend 
the time for completion of the preliminary results of this new shipper 
review to no later that January 14, 1998. We plan to issue the final 
results within 90 days after the date of the preliminary results are 
issued.

    Dated: September 11, 1997.
Richard W. Moreland,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, AD/CVD Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 97-24712 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 205 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 205

 To authorize the American Battle Monuments Commission to establish in 
    the State of Louisiana a memorial to honor the Buffalo Soldiers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2005

  Ms. Landrieu (for herself and Mr. Vitter) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the American Battle Monuments Commission to establish in 
    the State of Louisiana a memorial to honor the Buffalo Soldiers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Buffalo Soldiers commemoration Act 
of 2005''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF BUFFALO SOLDIERS MEMORIAL.

    (a) Authorization.--The American Battle Monuments Commission is 
authorized to establish a memorial to honor the Buffalo Soldiers in or 
around the City of New Orleans on land donated for such purpose or on 
Federal land with the consent of the appropriate land manager.
    (b) Contributions.--The Commission shall solicit and accept 
contributions for the construction and maintenance of the memorial.
    (c) Cooperative Agreements.--The Commission may enter into a 
cooperative agreement with a private or public entity for the purpose 
of fundraising for the construction and maintenance of the memorial.
    (d) Maintenance Agreement.--Prior to beginning construction of the 
memorial, the Commission shall enter into an agreement with an 
appropriate public or private entity to provide for the permanent 
maintenance of the memorial and shall have sufficient funds, or 
assurance that it will receive sufficient funds, to complete the 
memorial.

SEC. 3. BUFFALO SOLDIERS MEMORIAL ACCOUNT.

    (a) Establishment.--The Commission shall maintain an escrow account 
(``account'') to pay expenses incurred in constructing the memorial.
    (b) Deposits Into the Account.--The Commission shall deposit into 
the account any principal and interest by the United States that the 
Chairman determines has a suitable maturity.
    (c) Use of Account.--Amounts in the account, including proceeds of 
any investments, may be used to pay expenses incurred in establishing 
the memorial. After construction of the memorial amounts in the account 
shall be transferred by the Commission to the entity providing for 
permanent maintenance of the memorial under such terms and conditions 
as the Commission determines will ensure the proper use and accounting 
of the amounts.

SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Arthur RICKS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-120.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 1, 1969.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Gregory B. Hoppenstand, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

As to appellant’s first point on appeal regarding whether sufficient evi-*4144ence existed to support the trial court’s finding that the assault appellant was convicted for was committed with a deadly weapon, this question is one for the trier of fact. Blitch v. State, Fla.App.1967, 194 So.2d 1. As to appellant’s second point on appeal, that the proof adduced at trial was materially at variance with the information by virtue of the fact that the information charged the appellant with assaulting his victim by use of a brick, whereas proof at trial tended to show that the assault was committed with a rock, we find this contention to be without merit.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 181 (Thursday, September 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


Contra Costa Water District Multi-Purpose Pipeline Project, 
Contra Costa County, CA

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare a draft environmental impact 
statement and notice of scoping meeting; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior published a document in the 
Federal Register, on September 2, 1997, concerning intent to prepare a 
draft environmental impact statement and notice of scoping meeting. The 
document contained an incorrect day.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Steve Edmondson, telephone (209) 
487-5049 or Ms. Christina Ko Hartinger, telephone (510) 688-8335.

Correction

    In the Federal Register issue of September 2, 1997, in FR Doc 97-
23132, on page 46372, Volume 62, Number 169; in the first column, 
correct the Dates heading to read:

DATES: A scoping meeting is scheduled for the project on Thursday, 
September 18, 1997, at 7:00 p.m, at the Bay Point Ambrose Community 
Center, 3105 Willow Pass Road, Bay Point, California.

    Dated: September 10, 1997.
Susan Kelly,
Acting Area Manager, for South-Central California Area Office.
[FR Doc. 97-24833 Filed 9-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-94-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48244-48248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24291]



[[Page 48244]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary
Transmittal No. 97-40]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Assistance Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/CPD, (703) 
604-6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 97-40, with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and sensitivity of technology pages.

    Dated: September 9, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5000-04-M

[[Page 48245]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15SE97.035



[[Page 48246]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15SE97.036



[[Page 48247]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15SE97.037



[[Page 48248]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15SE97.038



[FR Doc. 97-24291 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-C
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>               <C>                     
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS             3-MOS                   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998            DEC-31-1999  
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1998            JAN-01-1999  
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-1998            MAR-31-1999  
<CASH>                                        398                 65,335  
<SECURITIES>                                    0                  8,788  
<RECEIVABLES>                                 933                  3,413  
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (101)                  (541) 
<INVENTORY>                                     0                      0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            2,473                 78,495
<PP&E>                                        914                  2,139  
<DEPRECIATION>                               (286)                  (955) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,101                 79,679  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       3,127                  8,060  
<BONDS>                                       429                    617  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       5,395                      0  
<PREFERRED>                                     0                      0  
<COMMON>                                        2                     18  
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,852)                70,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,101                 79,679  
<SALES>                                     2,156                  5,744  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            2,156                  5,744  
<CGS>                                         111                    648  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 111                    648  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            3,743                  7,575  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0                      0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2                    (39) 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,700)                (2,440) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0                      0  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0                      0  
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0                      0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0                      0  
<CHANGES>                                       0                      0  
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,700)                (2,440) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (0.23)                 (0.25) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0                       0 
        

</TABLE>
- 000100fc
- 000200fi
- 00030001
- 00040002
- 00050000
- 00060000
- 00070000
- 00080000
- 00090000
- 00100000
- 00110000
- 00120000
- 00130003
- 00140004
- 00150005
- 00160006
- 00170007
- 00180008
- 00190009
- 00200010
- 00210011
- 00220012
- 00230013
- 00240014
- 00250015
- 00260016
- 00270017
- 00280018
- 00290019
- 00300020
- 00310021
- 00320022
- 00330023
- 00340024
- 00350025
- 00360026
- 00370027
- 00380028
- 00390029
- 00400030
- 00410031
- 00420032
- 00430033
- 00440000
- 004500bi
- 004600bc
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6110

KEITH BRIAN WHITAKER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus THOMAS R. CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-3663-AW) Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 18, 1999Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Brian Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Keith Whitaker appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Whitaker v. Corcoran , No. CA-98-3663-AW (D. Md. Jan. 7, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 140I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0901 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 140I |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 64ό έτος21 Απριλίου 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0901

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 140I

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

64ό έτος21 Απριλίου 2021

---

| Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- |
| | Διορθωτικά |
| | Διορθωτικό στον Ευρωπαϊκό Οργανισμό για την Ασφάλεια και την Υγεία στην Εργασία (EU-OSHA), Μπιλμπάο — Προκήρυξη κενής θέσης για τα καθήκοντα του/της εκτελεστικού διευθυντή/εκτελεστικής διευθύντριας (Έκτακτος/-η υπάλληλος — Βαθμός AD 14) — COM/2020/20049 ( EE C 171 A της 19.5.2020 ) | 1 |

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

Διορθωτικά

Διορθωτικό στον Ευρωπαϊκό Οργανισμό για την Ασφάλεια και την Υγεία στην Εργασία (EU-OSHA), Μπιλμπάο — Προκήρυξη κενής θέσης για τα καθήκοντα του/της εκτελεστικού διευθυντή/εκτελεστικής διευθύντριας (Έκτακτος/-η υπάλληλος — Βαθμός AD 14) — COM/2020/20049 ( EE C 171 A της 19.5.2020 )

( EE C 171 A της 19.5.2020 )

1

---

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

Διορθωτικά

| 21.4.2021 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | CI 140/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2021

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

CI 140/1

---

Διορθωτικό στον Ευρωπαϊκό Οργανισμό για την Ασφάλεια και την Υγεία στην Εργασία (EU-OSHA), Μπιλμπάο — Προκήρυξη κενής θέσης για τα καθήκοντα του/της εκτελεστικού διευθυντή/εκτελεστικής διευθύντριας (Έκτακτος/-η υπάλληλος — Βαθμός AD 14) — COM/2020/20049

(
  Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης C 171A της 19ης Μαΐου 2020
  )

(2021/C 140 I/01)

Στη σελίδα 4, στο έκτο εδάφιο:

αντί:

«Προτού το διοικητικό συμβούλιο διορίσει έναν από τους επικρατέστερους υποψηφίους, θα ζητηθεί από τους υποψηφίους να παρουσιαστούν στους αρμόδιους φορείς του Συμβουλίου και της επιτροπής του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και να απαντήσουν σε σχετικές ερωτήσεις. Το Ευρωπαϊκό Κοινοβούλιο και το Συμβούλιο της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης γνωμοδοτούν και καταρτίζουν την οικεία σειρά προτίμησης. Το Διοικητικό Συμβούλιο διορίζει τον εκτελεστικό διευθυντή λαμβάνοντας υπόψη τις γνώμες αυτές.»

διάβαζε:

«Ο επιλεγείς υποψήφιος καλείται να προβεί σε δήλωση ενώπιον του Ευρωπαϊκού Κοινοβουλίου και να απαντήσει σε ερωτήσεις βουλευτών του Κοινοβουλίου.».

---
EXHIBIT 31.2


                   MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION

I, Richard H. Casper, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of DOLPHIN
PRODUCTIONS, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statement were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the"Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: August 12, 2003                          /s/ Richard H. Casper


                                              ----------------------------
                                              Richard. H. Casper, President
                                              and Principal Executive Officer