alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23806]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-501-000]


Texas-Ohio Pipeline, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

September 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, Texas-Ohio Pipeline, Inc. 
(TOP), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 66, with a proposed 
effective date of October 1, 1997.
    TOP states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's Order No. 636-C, issued February 27, 1997 in Docket No. 
RM91-11-006, et al. TOP states that it has revised its right of first 
refusal tariff provisions to reduce the contract term for matching a 
competitive bid from twenty years to five years.
    TOP states that copies of its filing were served on all 
jurisdictional customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Section 385.214 and Section 385.211 of the Commission's 
Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided in 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23806 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ERIC HOUSTON, #16891-074

Plaintiff,

v. 4:15cv63-WS

P.A. ZIMMERMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER DIRECTING TRANSFER OF CASE

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation

docketed February 12, 2015. See Doc. 3. The magistrate judge recommends that

the action be transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle District

of Pennsylvania, Lewisburg Division. The plaintiff has filed no objections to the

report and recommendation. 

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the

recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Case 4:15-cv-00525-MWB-JVW Document 4 Filed 03/13/15 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 3) is adopted 

and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. The clerk shall TRANSFER this action to the United States District

Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Lewisburg Division, for all further

proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of March , 2015.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:15-cv-00525-MWB-JVW Document 4 Filed 03/13/15 Page 2 of 2
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________

No. 08-2821

________________

Edward W. Sunder; Louis R.

Jarodsky,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

U.S. Bancorp Pension Plan,

Defendant,

U.S. Bank Pension Plan,

Defendant-Appellant,

Mercantile Bank Horizon 401(k)

Investment & Savings Plan;

Mercantile Bank Cash Balance

Retirement Plan,

Defendants.

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the

Eastern District of Missouri.

 [UNPUBLISHED]

________________

Submitted: January 13, 2010

 Filed: August 5, 2010

________________

Before MURPHY, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

________________
-2-

PER CURIAM.

Appellant U.S. Bank Pension Plan appeals from the district court's award of

attorney fees and costs in favor of Edward W. Sunder and Louis R. Jarodsky

stemming from the favorable district court judgment on their ERISA claims. We

reversed the underlying judgment in favor of Sunder and Jarodsky, see Sunder v. U.S.

Bancorp Pension Plan, 586 F.3d 593, 603 (8th Cir. 2009), and the court held this

attorneys' fee appeal in abeyance pending Sunder and Jarodsky's petition for certiorari

to the Supreme Court. The time for filing a petition for certiorari has lapsed, and the

appellees have not filed a petition.

On May 13, 2010, the court directed the parties to show cause why the district

court's attorneys' fee award should not be reversed. Having received no response from

Sunder or Jarodsky, we vacate the district court's award of attorneys' fees and costs

since the basis for the award no longer exists. See Dillard's Inc. v. Liberty Life Assur.

Co. of Boston, 456 F.3d 901, 903 (8th Cir. 2006) ("Because Dillard's is no longer the

prevailing party in the underlying ERISA suit, we vacate the district court's award of

attorney's fees and costs.") (per curiam).

The district court's judgment is reversed and its order vacated.

______________________________
#### Johnnie Warren BAXTER and Marjorie Baxter v. John D. GRAHAM, Rose M. Graham, First City Savings & Loan Association and Louis L. Dungan.

No. 50548.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 16, 1978.

Hurt & Dickerson, Darryl A. Hurt, Luce-dale, for appellants.

William T. Bailey, Sr., Lucedale, for ap-pellees.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., SUGG and COFER, JJ., and J. W. WALKER, Commissioner.

Affirmed.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 188 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize 

appropriations for fiscal years 2005 through 2011 to 

carry out the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Criminal Alien 

5 Assistance Program Reauthorization Act of 2005’’. 
2 

S 188 RFH 

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL 

2 YEARS 2005 THROUGH 2011. 

3 Section 241(i)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act (8 U.S.C. 1231(i)(5)) is amended by striking ‘‘appro5 priated’’ and all that follows through the period and in6 serting the following: ‘‘appropriated to carry out this sub7 section— 

8 ‘‘(A) such sums as may be necessary for 

9 fiscal year 2005; 

10 ‘‘(B) $750,000,000 for fiscal year 2006; 

11 ‘‘(C) $850,000,000 for fiscal year 2007; 

12 and 

13 ‘‘(D) $950,000,000 for each of the fiscal 

14 years 2008 through 2011.’’. 

15 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS. 

16 Section 241(i)(6) of the Immigration and Nationality 

17 Act (8 U.S.C. 1231(i)(6)) is amended to read as follows: 

18 ‘‘(6) Amounts appropriated pursuant to the au19 thorization of appropriations in paragraph (5) that 

20 are distributed to a State or political subdivision of 
3 

S 188 RFH 

1 a State, including a municipality, may be used only 

2 for correctional purposes.’’. 

Passed the Senate May 23, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
#### AL PFLUEGER, INCORPORATED, et al., Petitioners, v. John SANDILANDS et al., Respondents.

No. 40503.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 10, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 19, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
# L_2023132EN.01004501.xml

| 17.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 132/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 132/45

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/971

of 10 May 2023

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Cedro di Santa Maria del Cedro’ (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Cedro di Santa Maria del Cedro’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Cedro di Santa Maria del Cedro’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Cedro di Santa Maria del Cedro’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Cedro di Santa Maria del Cedro’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Cedro di Santa Maria del Cedro’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 May 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 25, 24.1.2023, p. 12.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24884]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 
Special Emphasis Panel meeting:

    Name of SEP: HLA Genotyping.
    Date: October 8, 1997.
    Time: 3:00 p.m.
    Contact Person: William Elzinga, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, NIDDK, Natcher Building, Room 6as-37A, 
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-6600, Phone: 
(301) 594-8895.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.847-849, 
Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases; Digestive Diseases and 
Nutrition; and Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, 
National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: September 12, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-24884 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 31.2  I, Dempsey Mork, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report for the period ended Sept. 30, 2009 on Form 10-Q of China Holdings, Inc.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Nov. 19, 2009   /s/ Dempsey Mork Dempsey Mork Chief Financial Officer
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6107

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ANTHONY RAVON RUFFIN, a/k/a Anthony Ray Ruffin , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. James A. Beaty, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 1:08

- cr - 00304

- JAB

- 1 ; 1:14

- cv 00087

- JAB

- JLW )

Submitted : May 25, 2017 Decided: May 31, 2017

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Anthony Ravon Ruffin , Appellant Pro Se. Michael A. DeFranco, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee

. Unpublished opinions a re not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Ravon Ruffin seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and the order denying Ruff in’s motion to alter or amend the judgment

. The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial show ing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district
court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ruffin has not made the requisit e showing. Accordingly, although we grant Ruffin’s motions to file addendums to his informal brief, we deny his motions for a certificate of appealability and for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument
because the f acts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 00-553.

#### Shinwari *v.*Raytheon Aircraft Co.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
From: Sargeant, Kathryn To: Whiteman, Chad ; Amanda_I._Lee@omb.eop.gov Cc: Davidson, Ken ; Yanca, Catherine ; Stewart, Lori ; Ghanta, Venu ; Nagelhout, Peter ; Jutras, Nathaniel ; Nickerson, William ; Machiele, Paul ; Charmley, William ; Brunner, Christine Subject: Follow-up to 3/12 OMB question on PM benefits Date: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:50:20 AM



## I wanted to follow upon Amanda’s question during our phone call yesterday, in response to which we had committed to send references to the appropriate places of Tier 3 and the LD GHG RIAs.

To compare PM reductions and related health impacts between rules, the appropriate metric is the national population-weighted change in annual average PM2.5 derived from the air quality modeling. These numbers are traditionally presented in the criteria pollutant benefits chapter in our RIAs. Refer to Table 6.3-12 in the 2017-2025 LDGHG RIA and Table 8-15 in the draft Tier 3 RIA. Also note that there are large ozone-related benefits associated with the Tier 3 proposal, whereas there were small ozone-related disbenefits in the LD GHG rule.

Please let us know if you have further questions.
### Shortcuts and special problems in aquifer tests

By: Ray Bentall

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1545C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Graphic method for plotting field pumping-test data(1952)                                    

                                        The spacing of pumped wells(1957)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# Jornal Oficial C 93I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 093I |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 64.° ano19 de março de 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 093I

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

64.° ano19 de março de 2021

---

| Índice | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | Retificações |
| | Retificação da Declaração comum do Parlamento Europeu, do Conselho e da Comissão Europeia sobre a Conferência sobre o futuro da Europa Diálogo com os cidadãos pela democracia — Construir uma Europa mais resiliente ( JO C 91 I de 18.3.2021 ) | 1 |

Índice

Página

Retificações

Retificação da Declaração comum do Parlamento Europeu, do Conselho e da Comissão Europeia sobre a Conferência sobre o futuro da Europa Diálogo com os cidadãos pela democracia — Construir uma Europa mais resiliente ( JO C 91 I de 18.3.2021 )

( JO C 91 I de 18.3.2021 )

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

Retificações

| 19.3.2021 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CI 93/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2021

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CI 93/1

---

Retificação da Declaração comum do Parlamento Europeu, do Conselho e da Comissão Europeia sobre a Conferência sobre o futuro da Europa Diálogo com os cidadãos pela democracia — Construir uma Europa mais resiliente

(
  «Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» C 91 I de 18 de março de 2021
  )

(2021/C 93 I/01)

Na capa, no Índice, e na página 1, no título:

em vez de:

«PARLAMENTO EUROPEU»,

deve ler-se:

«PARLAMENTO EUROPEU,

CONSELHO

E COMISSÃO EUROPEIA».

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Sandra J. Andre, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 17, 2007



                                        By: /s/ SANDRA J. ANDRE
                                            ___________________________
                                                Sandra J. Andre
                                                President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer