alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48820-48821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24672]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 090997E]


South Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
hold a meeting of its Sargassum and Water Column Habitat Sub-Group.

DATES: The meeting will be held on October 7-8 1997. See SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION for specific dates and times.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at NMFS Southeast Fisheries Science 
Center, 101 Pivers Island Road, Beaufort, NC.
    Council address: South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, One 
Southpark Circle, Suite 306; Charleston, SC 29407-4699.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Buchanan, Public Information 
Officer; telephone: (803) 571-4366; fax: (803) 769-4520; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#394a4c4a5857175b4c5a51585758577957565858175e564f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f0838583919ede92859398919e919eb09e9f9191de979f86">[email protected]</span></a>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Meeting Dates

    October 7, 1997, 1:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. & October 8, 1997, 8:30 
a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    The Sub-Group will meet to review Sargassum habitat and water 
column information in state, Federal and regional systems, and to 
discuss fishing and non-fishing threats to these habitats. The Sub-
Group will also discuss policy recommendations and research and 
monitoring needs for these habitats.
    Although other issues not contained in this agenda may come before 
this Sub-Group for discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act, those issues may not be the 
subject of formal Sub-Group action during this meeting. Sub-Group 
action will be

[[Page 48821]]

restricted to those issues specifically identified in the agenda listed 
in this notice.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to the Council office (see ADDRESSES) by September 
26, 1997.

    Dated: September 10, 1997.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-24672 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Reatha Little ARNOLD v. James McHANN, d/b/a Quik-N-Ezy Grocery and Jackson Coca-Cola Bottling Company.

No. 45548.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 15, 1969.

M. Charles May, Caldwell & Caldwell, Jackson, for appellant.

William H. Cox, Jr., Cox, Dunn & Clark, Elizabeth Hulen, William F. Goodman, Jr., Watkins & Eager, Jackson, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

SITEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of SITEL Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James F. Lynch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|               |  | /s/ James F. LynchJames F. Lynch
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|March 27, 2003 |  |                                                          |  | 

---

QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6205
S. C. LILES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; MARTIN J. MCDADE, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Rockingham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-97-91-3) Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 10, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. S.C. Liles, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Liles v. North Carolina Attorney General , No. CA-97-91-3 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 12, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit  32.2
                                                                  -------------

                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                              A Nevada corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Katharine Johnston, Principal Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




         Dated: August 17, 2009                      /s/ Katharine Johnston
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                Its: Principal Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
         other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
         signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
         this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
         retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are
         accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of
         the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
         1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
         filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.















                                Exhibit 32.2 - 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,003,810
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             100,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,590,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     39,270,458
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                     0
<LOANS>                                         99,342,905
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,522,641
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,145,175
<DEPOSITS>                                     140,122,963
<SHORT-TERM>                                       930,925
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                731,232
<LONG-TERM>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,799,790
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,560,265
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 155,145,175
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,378,062
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  595,367
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   103,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,076,429
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,314,120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,322,635
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,753,794
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       51,900
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,302,448
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    747,569
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         747,569
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       538,690
<EPS-BASIC>                                           2.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2.99
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        5.23
<LOANS-NON>                                         77,018
<LOANS-PAST>                                             0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,469,126
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        3,153
<RECOVERIES>                                         4,768
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,522,641
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,522,641
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                  0



</TABLE>
### Department of Energy W<lshington, DC 20585

May 22, 2009

The Honorable Eric {-{older Attorney General United States DepaltmentofJustice Washington, D.C. 20530

Dear Mr. Allomey General:

Pursuantto the requirements for antitrust review under section J25(o)(2)(B)(i)(V) ofthe Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended 

### CEPeA) (42 U.S.c. 6295(0)(2)(B)(i)(V) and 42 U.S.c. 6316(.), I have enclosed for your consideration acopy ofthe notice ofproposed rulemakjng (NOPR) in which the U.S. Department ofEnergy (DOE) is proposing new energy conservation standards for refrigerated bottled orcanned beverage vending machines. 

### rhave also enclosed acopy ofthe Technical Support Document (TSD), including the draH Environmental Analysis and Regulatory Impact Analysis (Chapters 16 and 17, respectively), which summarize DOE's technical analyses performed in support ofthe NOPR for refrigerated bottled orcanned beverage vending machines. All documents are provided in CD-ROM [onnat.

DOE has issued this NOPR underPartA ofTitle III ofEPCA, which provides for the Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products OtherThan Automobiles. The amendments to EPCA contained in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005), Pub. 

### L. 109-58, include new or amended energy conservation standards and test procedures for some ofthese products, and directs DOE to undertake rulemakings to promulgate such requirements. In particular, section 135(c)(4) ofEPACT 2005 amends EPCA to directDOE to prescribe energy conservation standards for beverage vendmg machines. (42lJ.S.C. 6295(v)),

DOE considers any lessening ofcompetition thatis likely to result from standards. The Attorney General determines in writing the impact, ifany, ofany lessening ofcompetition likely to result from a proposed standard. (42 U.S,c.

1 Because ofits placement in Part A ofTitle fll ofEPCA, the rulemaking for beverage vending machine energy conservation standards is bound by the requirements of42 U.S.C. 6295. However, since beverage vending machines are commercial equipment, DOE intends to place the
new reqUirements for beverage vending machines in Title 10 ofthe Code ofFederal Regulations (CFR), Part431 ("Energy Efficiency Program for Certain Commercial and Industrial Equipment"), which is consistent with DOE's prev!ous aclio:! to incorporate the EPACT 2005 requirements for commercial equipment. The location ofthe provisions within the eFR does nOl affect eithertheir substance or applicable procedure.6295(o)(2)(B)(i)(V); 42 U.S.c. 6316(a)) The Attorney General shall make such determination, in writmg, and transmitit together with an analysls ofthe nature and extent ofsuch impact. (42 U.S.c. 6295(0)(2)(B)(ii); 42 U.S.C. 63 16(a)) DOE will publish the determination and accompanying analySIS In the Federal RegisterWith the final rule.

We request that you complete yourreview ofthIs NOPR not later than 60 days from receipt ofthis letter. Thank you lor your attention to this maHer. If members ofyour staffhave any questions, they may contact Francine Pinlo in my office. Her telephone number is**202~586~7432.** Smcerely,

Eric J. Fygj Deputy General Counsel

Enclosures (2)

cc: Angela Hughes
No. 00-7313.

#### Hernandez *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Charlie CAMPBELL, Individually, and Admr. of Estate of James Campbell, Deceased, et al. v. Paul K. LACKEY et al.

No. 45649.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 23, 1970.

Scales & Scales, Fred T. Rucker, Jackson, for appellants.

Sullivan, Sullivan & Keyes, Scott, Barbour & Scott, Howie, Montgomery & Cur-rie, Jackson, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Russ George certify that:  

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of Planktos Corp.;  

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;   

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;   

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;   

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  

 

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  

 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 20, 2007  

 

/s/ Russ George

| Russ George |
|-------------|

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the corporate  general partner of CNL Income Fund XVIII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission of the Partnership's  Annual Report
on Form  10-K for the  period  ending  December  31,  2002 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:    March 28, 2003                          /s/ Robert A. Bourne
`                                                ---------------------------
                                                 Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                                 Title: President and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to
the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Harry Stylli, Chief
Executive Officer of Sequenom, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Quarterly
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Quarterly Report), irrespective of
any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 13th day of November, 2006.



/S/ HARRY STYLLIHarry StylliChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Gene RAINES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 37835.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 2, 1969.

John D. Buchanan, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, and Joseph S. Oteri of Crane, Inker & Oteri, Boston, Mass., for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

BOYD, Justice.

This cause is before us on appeal from the decision of the Circuit Court of Leon County upholding the validity of Chapter 398, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., on motion to dismiss and sentencing defendant, appellant herein, to six months’ imprisonment and two years’ probation for violation thereof. Because the trial court passed directly on the validity of a state statute, this Court has jurisdiction under Article V, Section 4, of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A.

Appellant was informed against on two counts of the sale of marijuana. He moved to dismiss the information on the grounds that Chapter 398, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., the Narcotic Drug Act, violates the Federal and State Constitutions. The parties stipulated that all transcribed evidence used in the case of Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Leis1 would be admitted into evidence in connection with the appellant’s motion to dismiss. In denying the motion to dismiss, the trial court specifically adopted by reference the thirty-one page order of Honorable G. Joseph Tauro, Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Massachusetts, in the *Leis*case, which order upheld the comparable Massachusetts Statutes.2

On appeal to this Court, appellant seeks to challenge the Constitutionality of the entire narcotic drug law on the grounds that marijuana is not dangerous, a point on which he says this Court must make an independent factual determination. He contends that the narcotic drug law is irrational and unreasonable; goes beyond the proper exercise of the police power; violates equal protection of the law guarantees; and provides for penalties which are cruel and excessive punishment.

After argument and upon consideration of the briefs of the parties and study of the record, we have determined that appellant’s contentions are wholly without merit. Marijuana is a harmful, mind-altering drug. It endangers the health of the user and is highly detrimental to the public welfare. This drug is within the category of injurious substances which the Legislature may regulate and prohibit in the exercise of its police power. No fundamental rights of the individual are violated thereby.

*331The trial court was correct in denying the motion to dismiss and its decision is accordingly,

Affirmed.

ROBERTS, DREW and ADKINS, JJ-, concur.

ERVIN, C. J., concurs in judgment of affirmance.

1

. Unreported lower court decision.

2

. Judge Tauro’s decision was subsequently affirmed January 9, 1969, in Commonwealth v. Leis, 243 N.E.2d 898 (Sup.Jud. Ct.Mass.1969).