alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2080 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit physicians 

and other health care practitioners from charging a membership or 

other incidental fee (or requiring purchase of other items or services) 

as a prerequisite for the provision of an item or service to a medicare 

beneficiary. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2005 

Mr. NELSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

physicians and other health care practitioners from 

charging a membership or other incidental fee (or requiring purchase of other items or services) as a prerequisite 

for the provision of an item or service to a medicare 

beneficiary. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Access to Medi5 care Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 2080 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF INCIDENTAL FEES AND REQUIRED 

2 PURCHASE OF NONCOVERED ITEMS OR 

3 SERVICES UNDER MEDICARE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1842 of the Social Secu5 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395u) is amended by adding at the 

6 end the following new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(u) PROHIBITION OF INCIDENTAL FEES OR RE8 QUIRING PURCHASE OF NONCOVERED ITEMS OR SERV9 ICES.— 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A physician, practitioner 

11 (as described in subsection (b)(18)(C)), or other in12 dividual may not— 

13 ‘‘(A) charge a membership fee or any other 

14 incidental fee to a medicare beneficiary (as de15 fined in section 1802(b)(5)(A)); or 

16 ‘‘(B) require a medicare beneficiary (as so 

17 defined) to purchase a noncovered item or serv18 ice as a prerequisite for the provision of a cov19 ered item or service to the beneficiary under 

20 this title. 

21 ‘‘(2) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sub22 section shall be construed to apply the prohibition 

23 under paragraph (1) to a physician, practitioner, or 

24 other individual described in such subsection who 

25 does not accept any funds under this title.’’. 
3 

•S 2080 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to membership fees and other 

3 charges made, or purchases of items and services required, 

4 on or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44254-44255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22084]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[A-583-009]

Color Television Receivers, Except for Video Monitors, From 
Taiwan, Termination of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: In response to a request from Proton Electronic Industrial Co. 
(Proton), the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated a 
review of the antidumping duty order on color television receivers, 
except for video monitors, from Taiwan on May 21, 1997, for the period 
April 1, 1996 through March 31, 1997. On June 26, 1997, Proton filed a 
timely withdrawal of its request for this review. Because there were no 
requests for review from other interested parties, we are terminating 
this review.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 20, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Ludwig or Michael J. Heaney, 
Office of Enforcement Group III, Import Administration, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230, telephone: (202) 
482-3833 or 482-4475, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 30, 1984, the Department published in the Federal Register 
(49 FR 18336) the antidumping duty order on color television receivers, 
except for video monitors, from Taiwan. On April

[[Page 44255]]

2, 1997, the Department published in the Federal Register (62 FR 15655) 
the opportunity to request an administrative review. On April 30, 1997, 
Proton requested a review for the period April 1, 1996 through March 
31, 1997. On May 21, 1997, in accordance with 19 CFR 353.22(c), we 
initiated an administrative review for the period April 1, 1996 through 
March 31, 1997 (61 FR 27720).
    We received a timely request for withdrawal for this request from 
Proton on June 26, 1997. Because there were no requests for review from 
other interested parties, we are terminating this review in accordance 
with 19 CFR 353.22(a)(5) of the Department's regulations.

    Dated: August 14, 1997.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement, Group III.
[FR Doc. 97-22084 Filed 8-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
```
#### Ex parte James O. HAYDEN.

No. 77-76.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 10, 1977.

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER, AL-MON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2062 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain deductions of school bus owner-operators shall be allowable in computing 

adjusted gross income. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2005 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that certain deductions of school bus owner-operators 

shall be allowable in computing adjusted gross income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘School Bus Driver Tax 

5 Fairness Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 2062 IS

1 SEC. 2. DEDUCTIONS OF SCHOOL BUS OWNER-OPERATORS 

2 ALLOWABLE IN COMPUTING ADJUSTED 

3 GROSS INCOME. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 62(a) of 

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain 

6 trade and business deductions of employees) is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

8 ‘‘(F) CERTAIN EXPENSES OF SCHOOL BUS

9 OWNER-OPERATORS.—The deductions allowed 

10 by part VI (section 161 and following) which 

11 consist of expenses paid or incurred by the tax12 payer in connection with the performance by 

13 the taxpayer of services as an employee while 

14 driving a school bus (as defined in section 

15 4221(d)(7)(C)) owned by the employee.’’ 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

18 December 31, 2005. 

Æ
English translation of the share transfer agreement



 Exhibit 10.28 
 [Stamp] 000010 
 Henan Wanzhong Real Estate Co., Ltd. 
 Share Transfer Agreement 
  

							
	Transferor    	 	Yang Yuyan	 	(Party A)	 	
				
	Transferee    	 	Henan Xinyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd.	 	(Party B)	 	

 In accordance with the “Company Law of the People’s Republic of China” and the
by-laws of the Henan Wanzhong Real Estate Co., Ltd. (hereinafter the “Company”), Party A and Party B under the principles of equality and mutual benefit have undertaken negotiations and have received the consent of the Company
stockholders to enter into the following agreement: 
 1. Party A is willing to transfer to Party B shares from the Company in Renminbi (longform) two million
Yuan, (¥2,000,000.00 Yuan) in total (from which [no value entered]    yuan), Party B is willing to accept the transfer sum of 1,827,759.066 Yuan. 
 2. The share transfer shall be completed on March 16, 2006 
 3. Starting from the day the share transfer is
completed, Party A will no longer enjoy the rights nor bear the obligations pertinent to the share transfer. Party B acknowledges the Company by-laws and shall enjoy the rights and bear the obligations of shareholder of the Company. 
  

					
	Party A	  	Yang Yuyan	  	Party B [Seal] Henan Wanzhong Real Estate Co., Ltd.

  

			
	(Seal or signature)	  	(Seal or signature)
		
		  	March 16, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24642]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 090997B]


Marine Mammals; Permit No. 970 (P557E)

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Scientific research permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a request for amendment of 
scientific research permit no. 970 submitted by Scripps Institution of 
Oceanography, Acoustic Thermometry of Ocean Climate Project, Institute 
for Geophysics and Planetary Physics, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, 
California 92093-02252, has been granted.

ADDRESSES: The amendment and related documents are available for review 
upon written request or by appointment in the following office(s):
    Permits Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 13130, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713-2289); and
    Regional Administrator, Southwest Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean 
Boulevard, Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802-4213 (310/980-4001); and
    Protected Species Program Manager, Pacific Area Office, NMFS, 2570 
Dole Street, Room 106, Honolulu, HI 96822-2396 (808/973-2987).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The requested amendment has been granted 
under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the provisions of Sec. 216.39 of the 
Regulations Governing the Taking and Importing of Marine Mammals (50 
CFR part 216), the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and the provisions of Sec. 222.25 of the 
regulations governing the taking, importing, and exporting of 
endangered fish and wildlife (50 CFR 222.23).
    This amendment incorporates into Permit No. 970 refinements to the 
research protocol, as provided for by Special Condition A.8. of Permit 
970.
    Issuance of this amendment, as required by the ESA was based on a 
finding that such permit: (1) Was applied for in good faith; (2) will 
not operate to the disadvantage of the endangered species which is the 
subject of this permit; and (3) is consistent with the purposes and 
policies set forth in section 2 of the ESA.

    Dated: September 11, 1997.
Ann D. Terbush,
Chief, Permits and Documentation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-24642 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
#### John C. SEIBERT, Executor of the Estate of George W. Seibert, Deceased, Appellant, v. Veda E. SPIRO, Appellee.

No. 70-5.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 30, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Murray W. Overstreet, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21300]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice 97-113]

NASA Advisory Council (NAC): Earth Systems Science and 
Applications Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 
92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 
announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council.

DATES: September 4, 1997, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; and September 5, 
1997, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: NASA Headquarters, Room MIC7, 300 E Street, SW, Washington, 
DC 20546.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Robert A. Schiffer, Code YS, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-1876.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Summary of Biennial Review Results
--Current Project Priorities and Oversight
--Framework for Science Management and Implementation
--EOSDIS Status Report
--MTPE Technology Plans and Programs
--ESSP Future Plans
--R&A deliverables vs Cost Tradeoffs

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitor's register.

    Dated: August 6, 1997.
Leslie M. Nolan,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-21300 Filed 8-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
```
# L_2009265EN.01004101.xml

| 9.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 265/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 265/41

---

DECLARATION BY THE NETHERLANDS CONCERNING ARTICLE 28 OF THE FRAMEWORK DECISION

In accordance with Article 28(2), the Netherlands hereby declares that, in cases where the final judgment has been issued within 3 years following the date on which the Framework Decision enters into force, the Netherlands will, as an issuing and an executing State, continue to apply the legal instruments on the transfer of sentenced persons applicable prior to this Framework Decision.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24659]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-31,943 and TA-W-31,943E]


Doran Textiles, Incorporated; Shelby, North Carolina and Fox-
Wells Sales Division, New York, New York; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on May 8, 1996, applicable to 
all workers of Doran Textiles, Incorporated, located in Shelby, North 
Carolina. The notice was published in the Federal Register on May 24, 
1996 (61 FR 26219).
    At the request of the company and State agency, the Department 
reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New 
information received by the company shows that worker separations 
occurred at the Fox-Well Sales Division, New York, New York location of 
Doran Textiles, Incorporated. The Fox-Well Sales Division provides 
support function services, sales, marketing and designing for Doran's 
production facilities located throughout North Carolina and South 
Carolina. The workers produce woven apparel, decorative and industrial 
fabrics, spun novelty yarn, fashion yarn and dye yarn.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of Doran Textiles, Incorporated, Inc. who were adversely 
affected by increased imports. Accordingly, the Department is amending 
the certification to cover the workers of Doran Textiles, Incorporated, 
Fox-Wells sales Division, New York, New York.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-31,943 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Doran Textiles, Incorporated, Shelby, North 
Carolina (TA-W-31,943), and Fox-Wells Sales Division, New York, New 
York (TA-W-31,943E) who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after January 18, 1995 are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington D.C. this 29th day of August 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-24659 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

# **CONSENT OF ERNST& YOUNG, LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 and relatedprospectuses (Registration Nos. 333-91548, 333-64732, 333-60076) and on FormS-8 (Registration Nos. 333-91544, 333-64166, 333-90489, and 333-42803) ofVCampus Corporation of our report dated March 14, 2003 (except for Note 17 atto which the date was March 28, 2003) with respect to the 2001 and 2002financial statements and schedule of VCampus Corporation included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K).

 

 

McLean, Virginia

March 29, 2004

 

----
#### David Nolan DRUMMOND v. STATE.

6 Div. 595.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Dec. 20, 1977.

Pat Nelson of Elliott, O’Rear & Robinson, Jasper, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and Milton E. Belcher, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

HARRIS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery and the jury fixed his punishment at ten years in the penitentiary.

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel raises two issues on this appeal in which he asserts error to reverse, (1) the absence of counsel at arraignment, and (2) comment by the District Attorney in closing argument on the failure of the defendant to testify.

The record at arraignment and the judgment entry affirmatively show that appellant was not represented by counsel at arraignment and that he did not waive arraignment. This constitutes reversible error. *Hamilton v. Alabama,*368 U.S. 52, 82 S.Ct. 157, 7 L.Ed.2d 114; *Garsed v. State,*51 Ala.App. 622, 288 So.2d 161; *Knight v. State,*42 Ala.App. 672, 178 So.2d 101; *Perkins v. State,*281 Ala. 139, 199 So.2d 839.

Since this case must be reversed for the error noted we do not deem it necessary to write to appellant’s other claim of error.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

All the Judges concur.
ACCEPTED 06-15-00183-CR SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 10/29/2015 1:46:55 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 178 / Monday, September 15, 1997 / Notices 48227

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 97–36]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense

Security Assistance Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of a

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of Public

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/CPD, (703) 604–

6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, Transmittal 97–36,

with attached transmittal, policy

justification, and sensitivity of

technology pages.

Dated: September 9, 1997.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M
48228 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 178 / Monday, September 15, 1997 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 178 / Monday, September 15, 1997 / Notices 48229
48230 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 178 / Monday, September 15, 1997 / Notices

[FR Doc. 97–24287 Filed 9–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–C
Exhibit
32.2





WRITTEN
STATEMENT


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with this Quarterly Report of China 3C Group and its subsidiaries
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned, Weidong Huang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





May
      7, 2009/s/ Weidong HuangWeidong
      HuangChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
256 La. 265

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Royan BURRIS.

No. 50628.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Royan Burris applying for writ of certiorari.

Application denied. The showing made does not warrant the relief sought.
#### Michael Ralph RINEHART, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. K-177.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Feb. 10, 1970.

Ragano & LaPorte, Tampa, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Horace A. Knowlton, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 14, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-51148

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN CARLOS LOPEZ-MEDINA, also known

as Juan C. Lopez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-433-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Carlos

Lopez-Medina raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.