alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States Court of Appeals
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ARTHUR LOPEZ, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2023

- 2431

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims

in No. 1:23

- cv

- 00620

- SSS, Judge Stephen S. Schwartz.

______________________

Before M OORE

, Chief Judge

, T ARANTO and C HEN

, Circuit Judges

.

P ER C URIAM

.
O R D E R

Arthur Lopez appeals from the United States Court of Federal Claims’s order denying his motion to reassign this case to another judge . Having considered Mr. Lopez ’s respons e to this court’s show cause order, we dismiss

. This court’s jurisdiction to review decisions of the
Court of Federal Claims is generally limited to appeals
“from a final decision

, ” 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(3) , i.e., one that “end[s] the litigation on the merits and leave[s] nothing for Case: 23-2431 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 02/22/2024LOPEZ v. US 2

the court to do but e xecute the judgment.” Haggart v.
United States , 943 F.3d 943, 951 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (citation omitted). The order denying a motion to reassign did not end this litigation on the merits.

Nor do the general exceptions to the final judgment rule apply here. T he collateral order doctrine does not apply because the order can effectively be reviewed on appeal after final judgment. See In re Preseault

, Nos. 628 et al., 2000 WL 1300418, at * 1 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 1, 2000) (dismissing as premature ) ; see also Shell Oil Co. v. United States

, 672 F.3d 1283, 1288 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (reviewing issue on appeal after final judgment)

. * The trial court also did not

enter a 28 U.S.C. § 1292( d ) (2) certification, which permits appeal from orders that the trial court finds to be controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that immediate appeal may materially advance the termination of the litigation.

Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

* Because a post

- judgment appeal is an adequate remedy for asserting a recusal challenge, mandamus relief would also not be available to Mr. Lopez here. See Preseault , 2000 WL 1300418, at * 2 (denying mandamus relief). Case: 23-2431 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 02/22/2024LOPEZ v. US 3

(2) All pending motions are denied.

(3) Each party shall bear its own costs.

February 22 , 2024
Date F OR THE C OURT Case: 23-2431 Document: 11 Page: 3 Filed: 02/22/2024
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the accompanying Yearly Report On Form 10-KSB of CRC Crystal
Research Corporation for the Year Ended December 31, 2007 I, Kiril Pandelisev,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of CRC Crystal Research
Corporation hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:





1.
            Such
      Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
            The
      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
      ended December 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of CRC Crystal Research
      Corporation





Dated:  March
26, 2008





CRC
CRYSTAL RESEARCH CORPORATION








By: /s/ Dr. Kiril Pandelisev


Chief
Executive Officer and


Chief
Financial Officer
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENE?tAL OF TEXAS 

ma. Coo. B. Bhem 

Coaptroller of Fabllo 

Auatfn , Tesae 

Dear sirr 

AUSTIN 

A.la44Yunts 

‘i. 

_.. ._ 44- 

dewsit shall be mds in any 

rson in thd naste of suoh depositor or 

aeposltor arid another person and wit& 

that 4uuh depoeit ah311 be paid to 

vor of thea, euekdepoait and dllp 

. may be paid to . . . the surviror 

T ;aa of then, ad s1103 pap;acnt sfrall 

ass tasnah bmk. . i ior. al.1 pq-mnta 

male. . . prfor to the receipt by suoh bask, . , of 

aotloe Fn writing not to psy. , . 

. . . 
Bon. ceo, R. Sieppard, page 8 

~8cotion la. That wken an? safety depoalt box 

h& been . , rctnt&l by any 'bank. in tke nmle of 

two or more &s*n*, wlth 7220 tighf'oi 3404~3 given 

to either, or tn the survivor, . . . either of suah 

parsons, whether the other be liring or not, shell 

have the rl@;G of aooaas. . . and my reacta tkereg:s&% rxa$aats thereof, azd ia all such oases. . . 

shall be exempt.from ell~liab~llit~ 

whatsoever ?&*a&:pcrron whomsoever Ior ,*srtitti-~e 

each aoceee. . . or reaovale . .” 

38otlon 16 oi Artialr 9144.~. veqw5~4 Annotated 

.Cl~51 Matutea,.was enacted by the legielst&o Ii 1953. 

The pertinent.porti.onu of t&et sot are as folio-nar 

belonging to such a 

~..deaeilaat’an~ ~ode~or~-are~psr8on~; shall 4eli7er. the 

SrislG~40 th4 . . ‘. imrrlvor 'or m-8 wh0a held tn 

tliis joint names of .a deoedent aad cue oe mor4 other, 

persons, or upon their er2er or requcgt, unless notioe 

be served upon t&e Comptroller aad delivery to 

~o".&e~onl.y in the preseaoo Of tbetC&~trollez or 

'. . . .*., ~agent., '. i ;;-~~ia.@wss tlx4 .xioa**.ller c,.,. :: ~. .,~oon8enta 

.' -~ailuPs td-~'rerYe: ~xJ5Oh y aqtl;i+.: g$;; l*.. ,;;,::;;..*ib*W4& 

&&x&ion &all rend.er suah . ."i bank. . ‘,* liable. :.:.I;;.. *.*L, 

to ~35% japiant of the"amouat,~oi ~.tkkEax or intereat 

due or~rtafter to become due upon said dyqiosite 

a penalty of mt less than $1003. 

&*pi&s thk* ?&X0.; azzd the yayaeaent of suoh . . . 

my,54 4n:iwced in any aourt, 0r competeLit jurlsdlotl0n.O 

The 1929 law RBS expressly repealed by t&a Taxa 

Btiling Code of 1943, ,paesed hy the 48th~ Legialeture at ita 

Re&ular Sese~on, being.?;. 2. so. 79, Chapter 97, page 127. 

Chapter 9, Art:cls 11 of tba nforwention~ atis provides a3 

r0li0x4: 

*The f~lloring ststutea, together wit:? all other 

law4 03 pexr;a of lnwa in oonfliat herewith, are hereby 

repealed; .' . . Aota of 1929, 4ldt L8giebMZ'e or TBxdP, 

p. 264, oh. 117, 3ectAons 1 and la (Articles 54116 and 

54le). . .* 
‘-1; 

. 4.3 

!iWs Aot beoane efieotive ninety 4~s aiter 

adjourbent of' the Legislature. 

was Ma-j 11, 1913. 

'f58 &at8 Of adjOUrOZ%nt 

Any doubts existin~,tl;erefore as to 

whether said Articles 34ld and 3418 me still In effeat 

have been dispelled by the 'expr833 repeal of thass srtioles 

by tba 48th Lrgialature. 

:_
No. 00-701.

#### City of Simi Valley *v.*Young.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of 211 Alpine Street, LLC, for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*out of time granted. Certiorari denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. William JACKSON v. Frank J. SHEA, Judge, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans.

No. 60060.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 2, 1977.

In re: William Jackson, applying for writ of mandamus.

Application denied: Since the trial judge denied the petitioners application on July 12, 1977, the petition for mandamus is moot.
7 February 2017

US Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

1200 New Jersey Avenue

SE West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20550

Request for Extension - Exemption Granted on 2 April 2015. Exemption No. 11276, Regulatory Docket 

No. FAA2015-0543 (Aero-Flite, Inc. – Authorization to use Restricted category CL-415s and RJ-85s for 

Type Rating and PPE Observation check-rides)

Reference (a) 14 CFR 91.313 (a, b)

(b) 14 CFR 61.31 and 61.58

(c) 14 CFR 21.25

Flight Standards Board (FSB) Reports CL-415, 1998

Aero-Flite Incorporated, holder of Part 137 Certificate WMWG078J, requests our exemption from 

§91.313 (a, b) to conduct pilot check flights as required by §61.31 and 61.58 in a Restricted category 

aircraft be extended. Specifically, we request authorization to use our Bombardier CL-415, and BAe RJ85 

aircraft to complete Type Rating check rides and Pilot Proficiency Examiner (PPE) annual observation 

check rides required by §61.31 and 61.58.

Attached to this request is the original request from Aero-Flite, Inc. dated 20 February 2015. Also 

attached is the corrected copy of the exemption granted to Aero-Flite, Inc. dated 2 April 2015 by the 

FAA. There are no changes to the request except the addition of four aircraft which I will list below along 

with the original aircraft in the exemption.

RJ-85s Serial number CL-415 Serial number

N839AC E2270 N389AC 2089

N354AC E2256 N392AC 2092

N355AC E2293 Additional aircraft to add

N366AC E2288 N386AC 2093

N374AC E2266 N385AC 2095

Additional aircraft to add

N635AC E2330

N403AC E2253

Your attention to this matter is appreciated and necessary for Aero-Flite to meet contractual obligations 

to the U.S. Forest Service, and to be available for emergency wildfire suppression. For clarification about 

this request, please contact the undersigned at 661-361-3043, or email (mlynn@aerofliteinc.com).
Regards,

Mike Lynn

Director of Flight Operations

Aero-Flite, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6107

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JEAN PAUL ALVARADO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (5:12-cr-00030-MFU-1; 5:17-

cv-81250-MFU-RSB)

Submitted: May 31, 2019 Decided: June 14, 2019

Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jean Paul Alvarado, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Harrisonburg, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jean Paul Alvarado seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Alvarado has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2041 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 

Referred to the Committee on Resources 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conveyance of a United States Fish and 

Wildlife Service administrative site to the city of Las 

Vegas, Nevada. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ed Fountain Park Ex5 pansion Act’’. 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

S 2041 RFH 

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

2 In this Act: 

3 (1) ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.—The term ‘‘admin4 istrative site’’ means the parcel of real property 

5 identified as ‘‘Lands to be Conveyed to the City of 

6 Las Vegas; approximately, 7.89 acres’’ on the map 

7 entitled ‘‘Ed Fountain Park Expansion’’ and dated 

8 November 1, 2005. 

9 (2) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the city of 

10 Las Vegas, Nevada. 

11 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

12 the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Di13 rector of the United States Fish and Wildlife Serv14 ice. 

15 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF UNITED STATES FISH AND WILD16 LIFE SERVICE ADMINISTRATIVE SITE, LAS 

17 VEGAS, NEVADA. 

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall convey to the 

19 City, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of 

20 the United States in and to the administrative site for use 

21 by the City— 

22 (1) as a park; or 

23 (2) for any other recreation or nonprofit-related 

24 purpose. 

25 (b) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—As a condition of 

26 the conveyance under subsection (a), the Secretary shall 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

S 2041 RFH 

1 require that the City pay the administrative costs of the 

2 conveyance, including survey costs and any other costs as3 sociated with the conveyance. 

4 (c) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary determines 

6 that the City is not using the administrative site for 

7 a purpose described in paragraph (1) or (2) of sub8 section (a), all right, title, and interest of the City 

9 in and to the administrative site (including any im10 provements to the administrative site) shall revert, 

11 at the option of the Secretary, to the United States. 

12 (2) HEARING.—Any determination of the Sec13 retary with respect to a reversion under paragraph 

14 (1) shall be made— 

15 (A) on the record; and 

16 (B) after an opportunity for a hearing. 

Passed the Senate July 11, 2006. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary. 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
No. 9317.

#### Berk et al., Exrs. *v.*Vinnedge et al.

(Decided May 8, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Butler county.

*Messrs. Andrews, Harlan $ Andrews,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Murphy & Williams; Mr. John F. Neilan*and *Mr. Sam D. Fitton, Jr.,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC

In the Matter of: DARBY AVIATION, INC.

FAA Order No. 2011-3

Docket No. CP08SO0026

FDMS No. FAA-2008-1192 1

Served: January 14, 2011

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 2

By notice served on January 12, 2011, the Co mplainant withdrew its appeal of the

initial decision served by Ad ministrative Law Judge Isaac D. Benkin on June 3, 2010.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT :

Complainant’s appeal is dismissed.

J. RANDOLPH BABBITT

ADMINISTRATOR

Federal Aviation Administration

[Original signed by Vicki S. Leemon]

VICKI S. LEEMON 3 Manager, Adjudication Branch

1 Generally, materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (except for materials filed in security cases) are also available for viewing at http://www.regulations.gov . See 14 C.F.R. § 13. 210(e)(1).

2 The Administrator’s civil penalty decisions, along with indexes of the decisions, the rules of practice, and other information, are availabl e on the Internet at the following address: www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_o ffices/agc/pol_adjudication/AGC400/ Civil_Penalty . See 14 C.F.R. § 13.210(e)(2). In addition, Thomson Reuters/West publishes

Federal Aviation Decisions . Finally, the decisions are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw (FTRAN-FAA database). For additional information, see the Web site.

3 Issued under authority delegated to the Chie f Counsel and the Assistant Chief Counsel for Litigation by memorandum dated October 27, 1992, under 49 U.S. C. § 322(b) and 14 C.F.R. § 13.202 (see 57 Fed. Reg. 58,280 (1992)) and re delegated by the Assistant Chief Counsel for Litigation to the Manager, Adjudication Br anch, by Memorandum dated August 6, 1993.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 167 (Thursday, August 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22951]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5883-8]


Workshop on Water Conservation Plan Guidelines and Water 
Conservation Plan Guidelines Subcommittee Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA will hold a Workshop on September 22, 1997 in Denver, CO, 
to discuss issues related to the water conservation plan provision of 
the 1996 Safe Drinking Water Act, and to provide a forum for 
stakeholder input in the development of these guidelines. On September 
23, 1997, the Water Conservation Plan Guidelines Subcommittee of the 
Local Government Advisory Committee, formed to obtain input on the 
guidelines, will also meet.
    The Workshop and Subcommittee meeting are open and all interested 
persons are invited to attend on a space-available basis. Minutes will 
be available after both sessions and can be obtained by written request 
from the Designated Federal Officer (DFO). To register for the 
Workshop, members of the public are requested to call Rudd Coffey, with 
The Cadmus Group, Inc., at (617) 894-9830, or fax at (617) 894-7238, or 
e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0e7c6d6168686b774e74677e6267606520606b7a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0b2a3afa6a6a5b980baa9b0aca9aeabeeaea5b4">[email protected]</span></a>. Those individuals interested in the 
Subcommittee meeting should call John Flowers at (202) 260-7288.

DATES: The Workshop will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Monday, 
September 22, 1997. The Subcommittee meeting will be held from 8:30 
a.m. to 12:00 noon on September 23, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Both meetings will be held at the Sheraton Denver West 
Hotel, 360 Union Boulevard, Lakewood, CO.
    Requests for minutes and other information can be obtained by 
writing to John E. Flowers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Office of Wastewater Management (Mail Code 4204), 401 M Street, S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20460.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The DFO for this Subcommittee is John 
E. Flowers. He is the point of contact for information concerning any 
Subcommittee matters and can be reached by calling (202) 260-7288. For 
further information regarding the Workshop, individuals should contact 
Rudd Coffey at the numbers provided above.

    Dated: August 18, 1997.
Alfred W. Lindsey,
Acting Director, Office of Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. 97-22951 Filed 8-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Cleve CUNNINGHAM and Queen Cunningham, his wife, Appellants, v. UNITED LIQUIDATORS AND INVESTORS, INC., a corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-21.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 30, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Knott, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of CFO under Section 906



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Francis X. McCarthy, Jr., the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ FRANCIS X. MCCARTHY, JR.                                                                          
|Francis X. McCarthy, Jr. Chief Financial Officer of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. March 31, 2005
EXHIBIT 4.02
                                                                    ------------

                           SEE RESTRICTIONS ON REVERSE

NO.  XX                                                              XXXX SHARES


                                 DSL.net, Inc.
                      Series Y Convertible Preferred Stock
                                $0.001 Par Value



This Certifies That                   -SPECIMEN-                 is the owner of
                    ____________________________________________

-XXXX-                                            Shares of the Capital Stock of
_________________________________________________

                                 DSL.net, Inc.

transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunder
affixed this __________ day of _______________ A.D. _______
<PAGE>

THE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS
AMENDED, OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS. THEY MAY NOT BE SOLD, OFFERED FOR SALE,
PLEDGED OR HYPOTHECATED IN THE ABSENCE OF A REGISTRATION STATEMENT IN EFFECT
WITH RESPECT TO THE SECURITIES UNDER SUCH ACT AND ANY APPLICABLE STATE
SECURITIES LAWS OR PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION UNDER SUCH LAWS, TOGETHER WITH, IN
CERTAIN CASES, AN OPINION OF COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT SUCH
REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED.

THE COMPANY IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE MORE THAN ONE CLASS OR SERIES OF STOCK. A
COPY OF THE PREFERENCES, POWERS, QUALIFICATIONS AND RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS AND
SERIES WILL BE FURNISHED BY THE COMPANY UPON WRITTEN REQUEST AND WITHOUT CHARGE.

THE SHARES OF STOCK REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN
VOTING AGREEMENTS AS SET FORTH IN A STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT, AS AMENDED FROM TIME
TO TIME, BY AND AMONG THE REGISTERED OWNER OF THIS CERTIFICATE, THE COMPANY AND
CERTAIN OTHER STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY, A COPY OF WHICH IS AVAILABLE FOR
INSPECTION AT THE OFFICES OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMPANY.






For Value Received ______ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto ________________

________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________Shares

of the Capital Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby

irrevocably constitute and appoint _____________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________Attorney

to transfer the said Stock on the books of the within named Company with full

power of substitution in the premises.

Dated ____________________________________

             In presence of

_______________________________________________________________________________