alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
New Commerce BanCorp (the "Company"), each certify that, to his or her knowledge
on the date of this certification:


               1.  The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended
                   March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
                   Commission on this date (the "Report") fully complies with
                   the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                   Exchange Act of 1934; and

               2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                   all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                   operations of the Company.



Date:    May 14, 2003              By:  /s/ Frank W. Wingate
                                      -----------------------------------
                                      Frank W. Wingate
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:    May 14, 2003              By:  /s/ R. Lamar Simpson
                                      -----------------------------------
                                      R. Lamar Simpson
                                      Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to New Commerce BanCorp and will be retained by New Commerce BanCorp
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-03-00581-CV

Timothy Turnipseed, Appellant

v.

State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GV301570, HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant filed his notice of appeal on September 15, 2003. The clerk’s record was

filed on October 13. On December 4, the Clerk of this Court sent appellant notice that his brief was

overdue and that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if he did not respond by

December 9. To date, appellant has not responded to this Court’s notice.

We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: January 15, 2004
Exhibit 99.4



|     |  |                                 |  |                         
|---- |  | ------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|LOGO |  |                                 |  |                         
|     |  | KPMG LLP                        |  | Telephone (403) 691-8000
|     |  | 205 - 5th Avenue SW             |  | Fax (403) 691-8008      
|     |  | Suite 3100, Bow Valley Square 2 |  | www.kpmg.ca             
|     |  | Calgary AB                      |  |                         
|     |  | T2P 4B9                         |  |                         



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm

The Board of Directors of Agrium Inc.

We consent
to the use of our reports, each dated February 21, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in this annual report on Form 40-F.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports in the Registration Statements on form S-8 (333-11254, 333-114276, 333-132207, 333-143334,
333-149666, 333-161620) and on Form F-10 (File No. 333-180315) of Agrium Inc.

KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

March 4, 2014

Calgary, Canada



KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms

affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. KPMG Canada provides services to

KPMG LLP.

KPMG Confidential
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of 

Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) 

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Global-Tech Advanced Innovations Inc. (the “Company”), doeshereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(1) The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31,2009 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form20-F. 

Date: September 30, 2009 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350and is not being filed as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document. 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23963]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Secretary


List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International 
Boycott

    In order to comply with the mandate of section 999(a)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is 
publishing a current list of countries which may require participation 
in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning 
of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
    On the basis of the best information currently available to the 
Department of the Treasury, the following countries may require 
participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within 
the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986):

Bahrain
Iraq
Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Oman
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Syria
United Arab Emirates
Yemen, Republic of

    Dated: September 3, 1997.
Joseph Guttentag,
International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 97-23963 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-M
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX) 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

Monday, June 30, 2014

Mr. Herman Lee Kindred

TDC#671207

McConnell Unit

3001 S. Emily Dr.

Beeville, TX 78102 Hon. Michael A. Sheppard

District Attorney

307 N. Gonzales

Cuero, TX 77954

Re: Cause No. 13

- 14

- 00357

- CR

Tr.Ct.No. 13

- 5

- 9030

Style: In Re Herman Lee Kindred

Enclosed please find the opinion issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch

Enc.

24th District Court

Hon. Sharon Mathis, Jackson County District Clerk
#### Richard C. HOWE, etc., et al., Appellants, v. SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 76-2320.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 2, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 18, 1978.

Howard Todd Jaffe, of Kaplan & Jaffe, P.A., Hollywood, for appellants.

Jonathon P. Lynn, of Stephens & Schwartz, P.A., Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a Summary Judgment entered in favor of a physician in a medical malpractice case. We reverse.

The procedure leading up to entry of the Summary Judgment was improper and prejudicial. It also appears from the record that factual issues existed. The Summary Judgment below is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings. See *Holl v. Talcott,*191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); and *Howe v. South Broward Hospital District,*345 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

DOWNEY, C. J., BERANEK, J., and BAKER, JOSEPH P., Associate Judge, concur.
#### William TOOLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 39869.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 2, 1971.

Appeal dismissed, sua sponte.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2085 

To provide a supplemental payment to assist agricultural producers in 

mitigating increasing input costs, including energy and fertilizer costs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 13, 2005 

Mr. BAUCUS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To provide a supplemental payment to assist agricultural 

producers in mitigating increasing input costs, including 

energy and fertilizer costs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—To assist agricultural producers 

5 in mitigating increasing input costs (including energy and 

6 fertilizer costs), the Secretary of Agriculture shall make 

7 available to producers on a farm that are eligible for a 

8 direct payment under section 1103 or 1303 of the Farm 

9 Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 

10 7913, 7953) a supplemental payment equal to the amount 
2 

•S 2085 IS

1 of the direct payment that the producers on the farm re2 ceived for the 2005 crop under that section. 

3 (b) ADMINISTRATION.—The Secretary shall use the 

4 funds, facilities, and authorities of the Commodity Credit 

5 Corporation to carry out this section. 

6 (c) EMERGENCY DESIGNATION.—The amounts made 

7 available by the transfer of funds in or pursuant to this 

8 section are designated as an emergency requirement pur9 suant to section 402 of H. Con. Res. 95 (109th Congress). 

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350(As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, Charles F.Flood, Chief Executive Officer of IESI Corporation (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section  906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

 

1.             The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 12, 2004 |                     |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------|
|                        |                     |
|                        |                     |
|                        | /s/ CHARLES  F. FLOOD    |
|                        | Charles F.  Flood        |
|                        | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer  of Golden Spirit Enterprise Ltd.(the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934  and that information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November 15, 2010

/s/ Jaclyn Cruz

Jaclyn Cruz

President and CEO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7425

DAVID KWON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

LYDIA WILSON, A Marion Correctional Treatment Center Doctor 

Psychologist,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief 

District Judge. (7:10-cv-00435-gec-mfu).

Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 28, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Kwon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David Kwon, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district 

court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2006) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) 

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Kwon v. Wilson, No. 7:10-cv-00435-gec-mfu (W.D. 

Va. Sept. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### PERCO, INC., a Florida corporation, George A. Cooney, Eileen Cooney, and Sylvia Harmon, Appellants, v. NEFF MACHINERY, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-733.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 10, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Order entered June 4, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00995-CR No. 05-20-00996-CR

No. 05-20-00997-CR No. 05-20-00998-CR

No. 05-20-01009-CR No. 05-20-01010-CR

No. 05-20-01011-CR No. 05-20-01014-CR

No. 05-20-01015-CR No. 05-20-01016-CR

No. 05-20-01026-CR No. 05-20-01027-CR

No. 05-20-01028-CR No. 05-20-01029-CR

No. 05-20-01030-CR No. 05-20-01031-CR

BOBBY CARL JESSIE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F20-20660-M, F20-20662-M, F20-37656-M, F20-

37473-M, F20-37472-M, F20-37471-M, F20-37657-M, F20-45556-M, F20-

24791-M, F20-45575-M, F20-45554-M, F18-47661-M, F18-35324-M, F19-

70272-M, F19-70325-M & F20-37540-M

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s June 1, 2021 pro se motion for access to the 

appellate record, informing the Court that he wishes to file a pro se response to the 

Anders brief filed by appellate counsel. Accordingly, we ORDER appellate 

counsel Lawrence B. Mitchell to provide appellant with copies of the clerk’s and 
reporter’s records in the above cases. We further ORDER appellate counsel to 

provide this Court, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, with written 

verification that the record has been sent to appellant.

Appellant’s pro se response is due by September 1, 2021.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Ernest 

White, Presiding Judge, 194th Judicial District Court; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County 

District Clerk; Belinda Baraka, official court reporter, 194th Judicial District 

Court; Lawrence B. Mitchell; and the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first-class mail, to 

Bobby Carl Jessie, TDCJ# 02329180, Travis State Jail, 8101 FM 969, Austin, TX 

78724.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24605]



[[Page 48897]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Geosciences; Committee of Visitors: Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Advisory Committee for Geosciences; Committee of Visitors 
(1755).
    Date and Time: October 1 and 2, 1997 8:30 AM-5:00 PM each day.
    Place: Room 730, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Donald Heinrichs, Head, Oceanographic 
Centers & Facilities Section, Division of Ocean Sciences; Room 725; 
4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230; telephone: (703) 306-1576.
    Purpose of Meeting: To carry out a Committee of Visitors' (COV) 
review, including examination of decision on proposals, reviewer 
comments, and other privileged materials.
    Agenda: Review activities of the Oceanographic Centers and 
Facilities Section.
    Reason for Closing: The meeting is closed to the public because 
the Committee is reviewing proposal actions that will include 
privileged intellectual property and personal information that could 
harm individuals if disclosed. If discussions were open to the 
public, these matters that are exempted under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) 
and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act would be improperly 
disclosed.

    Dated: September 11, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-24605 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. LOUISIANA GAS SERVICE COMPANY.

No. 59892.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1978.

Andrew P. Carter, Eugene G. Taggart, George F. Riess, Monroe & Lemann, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Rudolph R. Schoemann, New Orleans, for plaintiffs-respondents.

*504PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari for the purpose of considering whether Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 1153 and Louisiana Revised Statute 9:5801 were applied correctly with regard to allowing amended pleadings to relate back so as to interrupt prescription. After carefully considering the arguments and briefs of counsel and examining the record, we conclude that all issues presented in this Court were ably and correctly decided in the court of appeal opinion. *Allstate Insurance Company v. Louisiana Gas Service Company,*344 So.2d 386 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1977). Therefore, the judgment of the court of appeal is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

SUMMERS, J., dissents.

DIXON, J.,

concurs, only because first plaintiff’s claim was a subrogation from second plaintiff. Further, the “amendment” purporting to add a new plaintiff should have been treated as an intervention.

MARCUS, J., dissents and assigns reasons.

MARCUS, Justice

(dissenting).

I consider that the claim of William Coughran is barred by prescription. La. Civil Code arts. 3459 and 3536. Accordingly, I would overrule *National Surety Corporation v. Standard Accident Insurance Company,*247 La. 905, 175 So.2d 263 (1965). I respectfully dissent.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John W. OATIS.

No. 61515.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 31, 1978.

William J. O’Hara, III, Supervising Atty., New Orleans, Mary Coffman, Student Practitioner, Loyola Law School Clinic, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Vincent Paciera, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### RO 12577 PPC 9487.1986(03)

GASEOUS EMISSIONS FROM LANDFILLS

OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE

MAR 6 1986

Mr. H. Lanier Hickman, Jr.

Executive Director

Governmental Refuse Collection and Disposal Association

P.O. Box 7219 Silver Spring, Maryland 20910

Dear Mr. Hickman:

This is in reply to your letter to me dated December 5, 1985, in which you requested a clarification of how we intend to regulate gaseous emissions from landfills. In particular, you asked us to consider regulating gaseous emissions from hazardous and non-hazardous waste landfills through the Clean Air Act (CAA) rather than the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).

As we stated in the recently promulgated regulations on the burning and blending of hazardous waste (40 CFR Section 266.30),

we believe it is clear that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the authority under both Sections 3004(n) and4004(a) of RCRA, as well as the CAA, to regulate gaseous emissions from hazardous and non-hazardous waste landfills. The lead EPA office for developing air emission standards is the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS). Because OAQPS is only in the early stages of development of policies and rules pertaining to gaseous emissions from hazardous waste land disposal facilities, it is too early to provide you with anything definitive on this subject at this time. In addition,no decisions have been made regarding any revisions to the landfill gas provisions of the "Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices" (40 CFR Part 257). We will be developing regulatory options for the Criteria revisions during the next several months.

Because the GRCDA Landfill Gas Committee is already working with the EPA Subtitle D program on similar issues, it may be appropriate to discuss this issu e at the meeting planned for March 17, 1986, in Newport Beach, California. I have asked Allen Geswein of my staff to work with OAQPS to put this issue on the agenda for this meeting.

### RO 12577 -2-

I hope that this information is helpful to you and expect that through a coordinated effort we can develop an appropriate approach for dealing with gaseous emissions from non-hazardous waste land disposal facilities. If you have any specific questions on the development of the air emission standards for hazardous waste land disposal facilities, please contact Susan Thorneloe or Randy McDonald of OAQPS. Both can be reached at (919) 541-5671. Or, contact James Berlow of OSW at (202)

382-7917.

Sincerely yours,

Marcia E. Williams

Director

Office of Solid Waste

cc: Susan Thorneloe (OAQPS) Randy McDonald (OAQPS)
#### Elwood BARRETT, Sr., et ux., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, etc., Respondent.

No. 40813.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 19, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 242 So.2d 80S.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, BOYD, McCAIN and . DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN and ADKINS, JJ., dissent.