alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      23.1    CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
      Statements of Socket Mobile, Inc. of our report dated April 1, 2010, relating
      to the financial statements of Socket Mobile, Inc. (the "Company")
      (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
      paragraph regarding going concern uncertainty), included in this Annual
      Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.


- Registration
        Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-109150) pertaining to the 2,491,163 (post
        reverse split 249,116) shares of common stock of the Company;
- Registration Statement on Form
    S-3 (No. 333-104632) pertaining to the 4,844,797 (post reverse split 484,480)
    shares of common stock of the Company;
- Registration Statement on Form
    S-3 (No. 333-100754) pertaining to the 4,830,250 (post reverse split 483,025)
    shares of common stock of the Company;
- Registration Statement on Form
    S-3 (No. 333-87348) pertaining to the 500,104 (post reverse split 50,010)
    shares of common stock of the Company;
- Registration Statement on Form
    S-3 (No. 333-96231) pertaining to the 2,662,638 (post reverse split 266,263)
    shares of common stock of the Company;
- Registration Statement on Form
    S-3 (No. 333-82591) pertaining to the 3,005,909 (post reverse split 300,059)
    shares of common stock of the Company;
- Registration Statement on Form
    S-3 (No. 333-159923) pertaining to the 645,981 shares of common stock of the
    Company;
- Registration Statements on Form
    S-8 (Nos. 333-157975, 333-149688, 333-141587, 333-132345 and 333-123396) pertaining
    to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan of Socket Mobile, Inc.;
- Registration Statements on Form
    S-8 (Nos. 333-85721 and 333-59838) pertaining to the 1999 Nonstatutory Stock
    Plan;
- RegistrationStatements
    on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-123396, 333-106502, 333-87368, 333-85721, 333-68347,
    333-66060, 333-59838, and 333-07669) pertaining to the 1995 Equity Incentive
    Plan; and
- Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-106502) pertaining to the Socket
    Communications 401(k) Plan.

/s/
      Moss Adams LLP                                            Santa
      Clara, California 
      April 1, 2010
January 2 4 , 2012



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MARCUS TAYLOR , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 01057

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED . The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion, that the appellant pay all costs expended in

this app eal, and that this decision be certified below for observance.
Exhibit 11.1  Calculations of Net Income and Pro Forma Net Income Per Share.

                       AVANT! CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
  STATEMENTS RE: COMPUTATIONS OF NET INCOME AND PRO FORMA NET INCOME PER SHARE
                      (in thousands, except per share data)



                                                            Years Ended
                                                            December 31,
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                   1996       1995         1994
                                                 -------     -------     -------

Common shares outstanding:                        24,581      20,688      13,470

Common stock equivalents:
   Stock options and awards                        2,180       1,781         731
   Pursuant to Staff Accounting
     Bulletin No. 83                                --           520         745
   Preferred stock                                  --           851       5,125
   Shares deemed to be outstanding
     to fund shareholder distribution               --           319         386
                                                 -------     -------     -------

Total                                             26,761      24,159      20,457
                                                 =======     =======     =======

Net income                                       $12,484
                                                 =======

Net income per common share                      $  0.47
                                                 =======

Pro forma net income                                         $ 8,350     $ 4,009
                                                             =======     =======

Pro forma net income per share                               $  0.35     $  0.20
                                                             =======     =======


                                       46
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Dennis Ray WASHINGTON.

No. 59869.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 20, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 11, 1977.

Tommy J. Adkins, Ruston, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ragan D. Madden, Dist. Atty., O. L. Waltman, Jr., E. J. Bleich, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the undersigned, Darren Holm, Chief Executive Officer of China Holdings, Inc, (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his  knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006  Of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.

Date:       September 6, 2007

/s/Darren J. Holm-------------------------Darren J. HolmChief Executive Officer

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the undersigned, Dempsey Mork, Chief Financial Officer of China Holdings, Inc, (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to hisknowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006  of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  September 6, 2007

/s/Dempsey K. Mork  -------------------------  Dempsey K. Mork  Chief Financial Officer
Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Plaintree Systems Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2009.



[ex993a002.gif]



David Watson

President and Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates them by reference.



---





Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Plaintree Systems Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: Novmeber 12, 2009.





[ex992b002.gif]





Lynn Saunders

Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates them by reference.
#### Eugene N. COOKMEYER v. Joann Karl COOKMEYER.

No. 8264.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

June 30, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 9, 1977.

Writ Granted Nov. 14, 1977.

Gerald P. Webre, Metairie, for plaintiff-appellant.

Walter F. Gemeinhardt, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.

Before REDMANN, STOULIG and MORIAL, JJ.

REDMANN, Judge.

An ex-husband appeals from a judgment on his ex-wife’s “rule to distribute proceeds of sales” of community and separate property. The rule called for and the judgment performed a partial accounting and ordered distribution of funds from a savings and loan account.

La.C.C.P. 4605 requires the appointing of a notary public “to make the partition in accordance with law.”

Until such time as the notary’s work is completed and his proces verbal homologat-ed the ex-spouses are not entitled to any distribution of funds unless by consent of both.

The judgment appealed from is annulled and the matter is remanded for proceedings consistent with C.C.P. 4604 and following.
#### GLOBE PLUMBING, HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY v. ROUSSEL-HART CONTRACTORS. ROUSSEL-HART CONTRACTORS v. The HOUSING AUTHORITY of the TOWN OF WHITE CASTLE, Louisiana.

No. 61705.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1978.

In re: The Housing Authority of the Town of White Castle, Louisiana applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Iberville. 354 So.2d 1055.

Writ denied.

TATE and CALOGERO, JJ., would grant the writ.
|   | (1) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Oconee Financial Corporation (the      “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 (the      “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      November 16, 2009 | /s/      B. Amrey      Harden                                    B.      Amrey HardenChief      Executive Officer |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| Dated:      November 16, 2009 | /s/ Steven A.      Rogers                                   Steven      A. RogersChief      Financial Officer          |
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Mind2Market,   Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, James
Clark, CEO of the company,  certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ James Clark
                                         --------------------------------
                                         James Clark, CEO

Dated: August 24, 2004
Report of Independent Public Accountants


To Household Finance Corporation:

We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards, the consolidated financial statements of
Household Finance Corporation (the "Company") and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and have issued our
report thereon dated January 21, 1998.  We have not audited
any financial statements of the Company as of any date or
for any period subsequent to December 31, 1997, or performed
any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report on
those statements.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention
that caused us to believe that the Company was not in
compliance with any of the terms, covenants, provisions, or
conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the
"Agreement"), dated May 1, 1995, in conjunction with the
Revolving Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates Series
1995-1 insofar as they relate to accounting matters.  It
should be noted, however, that our audit was not directed
primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance.

As a part of our audit, we made a study and evaluation of
the Company's system of internal accounting controls over
the Company's home equity loan portfolio, including those
loans serviced under the Agreement to the extent we
considered necessary to evaluate the system as required by
generally accepted auditing standards.  In accordance with
these standards, the purpose of our study and evaluation,
which included obtaining an understanding of the accounting
systems, was to determine the nature, timing and extent of
the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an opinion
on the financial statements.  Our study and evaluation also
took into consideration certain of the criteria and audit
requirements in the Audit Guide for Audits of Non-Supervised
Mortgages Approved by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development.  However, certain procedures included in the
audit guide are not applicable to the home equity loans
being serviced for the Trustee, and therefore, were not
performed.

Our audit disclosed no exceptions or errors in records
relating to home equity loans serviced for the Trustee that,
in our opinion, Section 3.10 of the Agreement required us to
report.

This report is intended solely for the information and use
of the Board of Directors and management of the Company and
should not be used for any other purpose.



Chicago, Illinois
January 21, 1998<PAGE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Neutralhydrogen between galactic longitudes 200 ̊and 265 ̊**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:5/13
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001068453
 
August 28, 2018
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 49183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24878]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-104893-97]
RIN 1545-AV10


Guidance Regarding Claims for Income Tax Convention Benefits; 
Hearing Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed 
rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice of cancellation of a public 
hearing on proposed regulations regarding rules for determining whether 
U.S. source payments made to entities, including entities that are 
fiscally transparent in the United States and/or the applicable treaty 
jurisdiction, are eligible for treaty-reduced tax rates.

DATES: The public hearing originally scheduled for September 24, 1997, 
beginning at 10 a.m. is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evangelista C. Lee of the Regulations 
Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate), (202) 622-7190 (not a toll-
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The subject of the public hearing is 
proposed amendments to the Income Tax Regulations under section 894 of 
the Internal Revenue Code. A notice of proposed rulemaking and public 
hearing appearing in the Federal Register on Wednesday, July 2, 1997, 
(62 FR 35755), announced that a public hearing would be held on 
Wednesday, September 24, 1997, beginning at 10 a.m., in room 3313, 
Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 
20224.
    The public hearing scheduled for Wednesday, September 24, 1997, is 
cancelled.
Cynthia E. Grigsby,
Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 97-24878 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2010 

p0322 

Order 

 

March 29, 2010 

140129 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140129 

 COA: 284715 

St. Clair CC: 07-000837-FH 

GLENN EARL PARR, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 13, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Paivis, Corp. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory L. Bauer,
      Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





**COMPANY
              NAME CORPORATION**Dated:
                May 21, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Gregory BauerGregory
                BauerChief
                Executive Officer
              and
                Principal Financial Officer
#### Anna BILLINGS et al., Appellants, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 77-2441.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 15, 1978.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward A. Perse; George P. Telepas, Miami, for appellants.

Spencer & Taylor and W. Thomas Spencer, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.*v. *Diem,*358 So.2d 39 (Fla.3d DCA 1978).
#### CHARLES SALES CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. SOUTH SURF DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 2392.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 15, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Gary L. BAKER v. Joanne Taranto, wife of Gary L. BAKER.

No. 9005.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

April 11, 1978.

Guy J. D’Antonio, II, Metairie, for defendant-appellant.

Emile J. Dreuil, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before LEMMON, SCHOTT and BEER, JJ.

BEER, Judge.

The only issue properly before us in this appeal is whether or not the record supports the trial court’s conclusion that appellant is not in such relatively necessitous circumstances as should form the basis for an award of permanent alimony.1

We find no abuse of the trial court’s sound discretion in its determination that appellant’s take home pay of $597 per month is sufficient for an acceptable level of support and maintenance, notwithstanding the fact that her overall standard of living will, doubtlessly, be reduced from that existent during her marriage to appel-lee.

Some adjustment to a differential in one’s standard of living is, unfortunately, more often than not, an inherent part of the processes of divorce, but this factor *337alone cannot form the basis for an award of permanent alimony except in the instance of relatively necessitous circumstances — not proven here.

The judgment is affirmed.

*AFFIRMED.*

1

. Since the husband did not appeal from the judgment which specifically found the wife free from fault, the wife is eligible for alimony if circumstances change so that she no longer has sufficient means for her maintenance.