alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3
                                                                     -----------

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                         CTBI PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST II

     THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF CTBI PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST II (the "Trust"),
dated as of January 7, 2002, is being duly executed and filed on behalf of the
Trust by the undersigned, as trustees, to form a business trust under the
Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801 et seq.) (the "Act").

     1.  NAME. The name of the business trust formed hereby is CTBI Preferred
Capital Trust II.

     2.  DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of the
Trust in the State of Delaware is First Union Trust Company, National
Association, One Rodney Square, 920 King Street, Suite 102, Wilmington, Delaware
19801, Attention: Corporate Trust Administration.

     3.  EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective on the
date of filing.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned, being a trustee of the Trust,
has executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811 of the
Act.

                                              FIRST UNION TRUST COMPANY,
                                              NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee


                                              By: /s/ Edward L. Truitt, Jr.
                                                  ------------------------------
                                              Name:   Edward L. Truitt, Jr.
                                              Title:  Vice President


                                              /s/ Jean R. Hale
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              JEAN R. HALE, as Trustee


                                              /s/ Mark A. Gooch
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              MARK A. GOOCH, as Trustee


                                              /s/ William Hickman, III
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              WILLIAM HICKMAN III, as Trustee
# Discover research fromSmithsonian Institution Scholarly Press

RSS feed

ALLCategoriesSeries or Research GroupSEARCH
#### RANCH HOUSE RESTAURANTS OF DADE COUNTY, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. Alec P. COURTELIS, Appellee.

No. 70-1198.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 17, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
CONFIRMATION

TO:      JOE MISETICH

         This is to confirm the renewal of the employment agreement made as of
October 1, 2000, for a further one year period commencing on October 1, 2001,
and ending on September 30, 2002, under the same terms and conditions,
including, the terms relating to compensation.

         Dated at Markham this 1st day of October, 2001.



         MIAD SYSTEMS LTD.


         Per:
         -------------------------------------------------
         Michael Green - President
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Silver Bow Antique Aviation (the 'Company"),
hereby certify, that to the best of my knowledge,
the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: December 4, 2002

/s/ Dempsey Mork
--------------------
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|  | (1) | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods      indicated. |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      16, 2009   |   | /s/ Bennet P.      Tchaikovsky              |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                                |   | Bennet      P. Tchaikovsky                       |
|                                                |   | Chief      Financial Officer                     |
|                                                |   | (Principal      Financial and AccountingOfficer) |

----
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 13

- 00101

- CV

DANNY WAYNE MARTIN, Appellant

V.

AMANDA JOANN PARRIS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court

Red River County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV03126

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Danny Wayne Martin, appellant, has filed a motion seeking to dismiss this appeal.

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), the motion is granted. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

We dismiss the appeal.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: December 9, 2013

Date Decided: December 10, 2013
#### Michael J. ALAGNA, Appellant, v. Josephine ALAGNA, Appellee.

No. 2035.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 20, 1969.

Rehearing Denied May 27, 1969.

*228Daniel G. Satin, Miami, for appellant.

Robert M. Sturrup, of Thomas, Sturrup, Sauls & Della-Donna, Hollywood, for ap-pellee.

HENSLEY, ROBERT E., Associate Judge.

The appellant, defendant below, who is the executor of the estate of Nicholas Alag-na, appeals an order denying his motion to quash service of process. Service herein was upon his agent or attorney appointed by him in the probate proceedings, pursuant to F.S.1967, Section 732.47(2), F.S.A.

Appellee, plaintiff below, alleged that she had an interest in the estate as the decedent’s widow who had elected dower. She sued on behalf of the estate on a promissory note given by the defendant to the decedent and another, claiming such note to be an asset of the estate, that the executor failed to list it as an estate asset, that it was due and payable and “on behalf of and as an interested party in the Estate of Nicholas Alagna, deceased, demands judgment against defendant in the amount of $85,474.-57, together with interest from June 1, 1966, attorneys’ fees and costs.”

The lower court refused to quash service on the basis of the holding in Royalty v. Florida National Bank of Jacksonville, 1937, 127 Fla. 618, 173 So. 689. In the Royalty case the executrix was sued individually and in her representative capacity. Service was made on her agent and by publication. The relief sought related to an agreement and certain funds paid thereon, as well as a personal judgment. The court held that insofar as the estate was involved, service on her agent was valid and insofar as property or a fund was involved, service by publication was valid if it was determined that the property or the fund was situated within the jurisdiction of the court. It went on to hold, however, “but no merely personal judgment or decree may legally be rendered against her * * * ”. In this cause the defendant was sued individually only, the note was given the decedent prior to his death and did not accrue in the administration of the estate, there was no fund involved, and the sole relief demanded was a personal judgment against the defendant for money alleged to be due and owing by him.

We hold service insufficient and reverse.

OWEN, J., concurs.

CROSS, J., concurs in conclusion.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 199 

For the relief of Ricardo F. Pedrotti. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2005 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Ricardo F. Pedrotti.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101 et seq.), Ricardo F. Pedrotti, who was born on April 

7 4, 1978, shall be held and considered to have been lawfully 

8 admitted to the United States for permanent residence as 

9 of the date of enactment of this Act upon payment of the 

10 required visa fees. 
2

•S 199 IS

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

2 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Ricardo 

3 F. Pedrotti, as provided in section 1, the Secretary of 

4 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by the ap5 propriate number during the current fiscal year the total 

6 number of immigrant visas available to natives of the 

7 country of Ricardo F. Pedrotti’s birth under section 

8 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

9 1153(a)).

Æ
January 11,2015 

21781 Aviation A venue 

Georgetown, Delaware 1994 7 

Phone: 302-854-0244 

Federal Aviation Administration 

c/o U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Fl. Rm W12-140 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

: .. ,; :· 

Re: Change ofUnited States Postal Service mailing address for Delaware Aviation 

Museum Foundation exemptions 8702 and 10872 

To Whom It May Concern: 

The Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation, a 501(c)(3) organization based at the 

Sussex County Airport, Georgetown, Delaware, is the holder of Exemption 

8702D and Exemption 10872. The mailing address on both of these exemptions is 

21513 Rudder Lane, Georgetown, De 1994 7. 

Due to recent street construction at the Sussex County Airport, and reassignment 

of addresses at the airport to conform to Emergency Management requests, our 

new mailing address is: 21781 Aviation Avenue, Georgetown Delaware, 19947. 

Our physical location has not changed, just the mailing address as assigned by 

Emergency Management and the U.S. Postal Service. 

I am requesting the mailing address of record for both of the above referenced 

FAA Exemptions, be changed to 21781 Aviation A venue, Georgetown Delaware 

19947. 

~~~ Larry D. Kelley 

VP and Executive Director 

Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation 

1
#### Logan JAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2474.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

May 12, 1969.

Louis R. Bowen, Jr., Public Defender, and Ronald L. Sims, Special Asst. Public Defender, Orlando, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and J. Terrell Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Schmerber v. California, 1966, 384 U.S. 757, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908; Miranda v. Arizona, 1966, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694; United States v. Gibson, 4 Cir.1968, 392 F.2d 373; Allen v. United States, 1968, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 61, 390 F.2d 476; Hall v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 202.

CROSS, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX
75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

September 28, 2011

Memorandum

Subject: S outh C oast and S an J oaquin V alley E missions R eductions

from ARB's Operational I dling R equirements

From: Doris Lo, EPA Region 9, Air Division, Planning Office (AIR

- 2)

To: San Joaquin Valley PM2.5 Docket No. EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2010

- 0516 and

South Coast PM2.5 Docket No. EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2009

- 0366

On September 21, 2011, in response to my question, Kurt Karperos, ARB, called to report that the reductions associated with the operational ( or manual shut

- off) requirement of ARB’s heavy

- duty engine idling rule are 1.3 t ons p er d ay NOx in the South Coast and 0.2 t ons per day NOx in the San Joaquin Valley

.
EXHIBIT 32(a)

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of Citizens Holding Company (the Company), as
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Greg L. McKee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 7, 2007 |  | /s/ Greg L. McKee      
|                     |  | Greg L. McKee          
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1    Certification Pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350     I, Gunther Than, President and Treasurer of View Systems, Inc. (the Corporation), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:  1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.


|                   |                    |                                                                                                                      | 
|------------------ | ------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                   |                    |                                                                                                                      | 
|                   | View Systems, Inc. |                                                                                                                     
|                   |                    |                                                                                                                      | 
|Date: May 16, 2011 | By:                | /s/ Gunther Than                                                                                                     | 
|                   |                    | Gunther Than                                                                                                         | 
|                   |                    | President and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)
|                   |                    |                                                                                                                      |
#### Antonio PEREZ, Petitioner, v. SEACOAST TRANSPORTATION COMPANY and Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 40683.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 26, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1971.

John A. Chilldon, Tampa, for petitioner.

James E. Thompson, of Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey, Kinney & Boggs, Tampa, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari claimant seeks review of an order of the Industrial Relations Commission reversing an order of the Judge of Industrial Claims. The order of the Claims Judge held that the Industrial Relations Commission had jurisdiction of the subject matter of, and parties to, the instant case.

We conclude that the findings of fact contained in the order of the Judge of Industrial Claims on the issue of the independent corporate existence of Seacoast Transportation Company apart from that of Seaboard Coastline Railroad are wholly inadequate to permit intelligent review.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is granted without oral argument, the order of the Full Commission is vacated, and the Full Commission is hereby directed to remand the cause to the Judge of Industrial Claims for further findings of fact, and for entry of an order in compliance with the requirements of the act and decisions thereunder. See Hardy v. City of Tarpon Springs, 81 So.2d 503 (Fla.1955); and Ball v. Mann, 75 So.2d 758 (Fla.1954). The Judge of Industrial Claims may require additional testimony of the parties if he deems such necessary.

An attorney’s fee of $350.00 is awarded to claimant’s attorney.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
#### Rodney PRICE, Appellant, v. Voyle C. JOHNSON, Appellee.

No. 68-562.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 29, 1969.

Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for appellant.

Hansford D. Tyler, Jr., Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The instant appeal is one of several which have reached this court that concern various aspects of an action for a declaratory decree instituted by Airlift International, Inc., against James H. Price, Voyle C. Johnson, and others to determine ownership of 1,704,274 shares of Airlift common stock. It concerns a third party action brought by appellee, Voyle C. Johnson, against appellant, Rodney Price.

Appellee purchased 100,000 shares of Airlift common stock from a broker, appellant’s father. The broker later conveyed ten stock certificates representing 100,000 shares of Airlift common stock to appellant. By his third party complaint appellee sought to have those ten stock certificates declared to be his property. The judgment appealed from, in effect, granted him the relief sought.

 A broker is not required to deliver specific stock certificates to a purchaser in the absence of an agreement to the contrary. See 12 Am.Jur.2d, Brokers, §§ 134, 142. (Appellee’s purchase occurred before the Uniform Commercial Code went into effect in Florida. A similar purchase made after January 1, 1967, would be governed by the provisions of § 678.8-107, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.) The record does not show that appellee and the broker agreed that the broker would deliver the ten stock certificates in controversy to appellee. And since the record shows the broker is *212able to deliver 100,000 shares of Airlift common stock to appellee, appellee has no present claim against appellant. '

For the foregoing reasons we reverse the judgment appealed from and remand the cause to the trial court with directions that the court amend that judgment by striking from it all provisions which grant appellee relief against appellant or his assigns.

Reversed and remanded with directions.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStructural CeramicsThis publication is a compilation of abstracts and slides of papers presented at the NASA Lewis Structural Ceramics Workshop. Collectively, these papers depict the scope of NASA Lewis' structural ceramics program. The technical areas include monolithic SiC and Si3N4 development, ceramic matrix composites, tribology, design methodology, nondestructive evaluation (NDE), fracture mechanics, and corrosion.Document ID19880014488Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference ProceedingsDate AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1986Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-3063NAS 1.55:2427NASA-CP-2427Accession Number88N23872Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 533-05-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880014488.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitleN88-23873 through N88-23892Workvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
1260157

oe via
Ve
G (J)
3)
ES
Fo
i)
oS
°
silk is}
sy
Ry
FS,
o
<I
Qa
&

WATERSUPPLY PAPER 1254 PLATE 5

124200"

EXPLANATION

es
[Tau]
U1 ade pone _
imconsolidated doposits of ton
Sop ed dee ind fet
flata Soporte a anaeaise/ eit Roo
Eres permele be tapped by vel Oe
ie smadarateto large quantined of eset

‘Dune sand
Active dunea and older eolian sand near the coast.
Yields moderate quantities of water to welle

QUATERNARY

TERTIARY

Schist
‘Slightly metamorphosed Largaly phyllites and
ieee we =

JURASSIC

Contact
Dashed where approzimately located
Contact of sehist and ultrabasic intrusives modified
‘Salem Rice and Francia G, Welle

2

Strike and dip of beds

°
Domestic, public supply, or industrial well

°
Irrigation well
e
‘Test hole
‘Abandoned well

er 2 Ns
‘Well numbering system described in text

‘TRUE NORTH

T.
14400"
Ss.
it
19
\N

|

ey RZ,
‘Base from parts of U. S. Geological Survey maps
‘of Crescent City and Klamath quadrangles

RiwW. 10

INTERIOR—GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. WASHINGTON.D.C NM RLAN4e

RIE a ~ RZE

Geology by William Back, 1953,

GEOLOGIC MAP AND SECTIONS OF THE SMITH RIVER PLAIN AREA, SHOWING LOCATIONS OF SELECTED WELLS
AND WATER-LEVEL PROFILES OF 1953, NORTHWESTERN DEL NORTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

i}

‘Scale 1:62,500

5 Miles

1260
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1099
BABATUNDE BIODUN OTUBANJO, Petitioner,
v. MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: August 26, 2008 Decided: September 4, 2008 Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Irena I. Karpinski, LAW OFFICES OF IRENA I. KARPINSKI, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Francis Fraser, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jason Xavier Hamilton, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Babatunde Biodun Otubanjo, a native and citizen of Nigeria, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming the decision of the Immigration Judge denying his request for a continuance for adjudication of a petition for alien relative. We have carefully reviewed the record and conclude that the decision to deny a continuance was not an abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (2008); Onyeme v. INS , 146 F.3d 227, 231 (4th Cir. 1998). We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED