alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

15 U.S.C. SECTION 7241

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert T. Barker, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 29, 2016



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert T. Barker                                          
|Robert T. Barker                                              
|Vice President, Controller and Interim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, W. Michael Smith, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Remote Dynamics, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: June 24, 2005                                          /s/  W. Michael Smith   W. Michael Smith, Executive VicePresident, Chief
cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge 

Abdul Howard 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A are 

2
#### MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael W. SCANLAN, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 2882.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.

Nov. 25, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 7, 1970.

Young & Burson, by I, J. Burson, Jr., Eunice, for defendants-appellants.

Shotwell, Brown & Sperry, by E. C. Stout, Monroe, and Garland, Dejean & Berggreen, by H. B. Dejean, Jr., Opelousa, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before SAVOY, HOOD and MILLER, JJ-

SAVOY, Judge.

This expropriation suit was consolidated for trial and appeal with the companion case of Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Company v. Miller, 229 So.2d 182 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1969), decided also on this date.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case, the judgment of the district court is amended so as to increase the award to defendants, Michael W. Scanlan, Jr., Lela Andrus Scanlan, and Carl Dean Scanlan, from $180.00 to $654.00, together with legal interest on all unpaid amounts from the date of the taking, until paid. In all other respects, the judgment of the district court is affirmed at plaintiff-appellee’s costs.

Amended and affirmed.

HOOD, J., dissents for reasons assigned in 229 So.2d 182 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1969).

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

HOOD, J., is of the opinion that a rehearing should be granted.
#### Joseph S. BROWN, Appellant, v. George NOURSE, Appellee.

No. 69-667.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 10, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 203 

To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be paid for sodium produced 

on Federal lands, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2005 

Mr. THOMAS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the royalty required to be paid for 

sodium produced on Federal lands, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Soda Ash Royalty Re5 duction Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN ROYALTY RATE ON SODA ASH. 

7 Notwithstanding section 102(a)(9) of the Federal 

8 Land Policy Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 

9 1701(a)(9)), section 24 of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 

10 U.S.C. 262), and the terms of any lease under that Act, 
2 

•S 203 IS

1 the royalty rate on the quantity or gross value of the out2 put of sodium compounds and related products at the 

3 point of shipment to market from Federal land in the 5- 

4 year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 

5 Act shall be 2 percent. 

6 SEC. 3. STUDY. 

7 After the end of the 4-year period beginning on the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, and before the end of 

9 the 5-year period beginning on that date, the Secretary 

10 of the Interior shall report to the Congress on the effects 

11 of the royalty reduction under this Act, including— 

12 (1) the amount of sodium compounds and re13 lated products at the point of shipment to market 

14 from Federal land during that 4-year period; 

15 (2) the number of jobs that have been created 

16 or maintained during the royalty reduction period; 

17 (3) the total amount of royalty paid to the 

18 United States on the quantity or gross value of the 

19 output of sodium compounds and related products at 

20 the point of shipment to market produced during 

21 that 4-year period, and the portion of such royalty 

22 paid to States; and 

23 (4) a recommendation of whether the reduced 

24 royalty rate should apply after the end of the 5-year 
3 

•S 203 IS

1 period beginning on the date of the enactment of 

2 this Act. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*



The undersigned officers of BWAY Corporation (the Company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that,
to their knowledge:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended October 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Dated: December 30, 2004            
|                                    
|/s/ Jean-Pierre M. Ergas            
|Jean-Pierre M. Ergas                
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|                                    
|/s/ Kevin C. Kern                   
|Kevin C. Kern                       
|Vice-President of Administration and
|Chief Financial Officer             

---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BWAY Corporation and will be retained by BWAY Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### James B. WADSWORTH, Appellant, v. Claude R. KIRK, Jr., as Governor of the State of Florida, et al., Appellees.

No. N-154.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District,

April 1, 1971.

Jesse F. Warren, Jr., Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arthur C. Canaday, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

This case has been orally argued before this court, and the briefs and record on appeal have been read and given full consid*124eration. We are of the view that the Circuit Court’s final judgment in this case conforms with the holding of this court with State ex rel. O’Donald v. City of Jacksonville Beach1 and conforms with the well-settled principle enunciated in 52 A.L.R.2d 437, § 2(b).

JOHNSON, C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

1

. State ex rel. O’Donald v. City of Jacksonville Beach, 142 So.2d 349 (Fla.App. 1st, 1962), affirmed, 151 So.2d 430 (Fla. 1963).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24617]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3815-000]


Friendly Power Company LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

September 11, 1997.
    Friendly Power Company LLC (Friendly) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Friendly will engage in wholesale electric power 
and energy transactions as a marketer. Friendly also requested waiver 
of various Commission regulations. In particular, Friendly requested 
that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by 
Friendly.
    On September 4, 1997, pursuant to delegated authority, the 
Director, Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power 
Regulation, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, 
subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protests the blanket approval of issuance of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Friendly should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Friendly is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary of 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Friendly's issuances of securities or assumptions 
of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is October 6, 1997. Copies 
of the full text of the order are available from the Commission's 
Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24617 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49303]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24998]



[[Page 49303]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries; Advisory Committee 
on Actuarial Examinations; Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Advisory Committee on Actuarial 
Examinations will meet in Conference Room 230 A&B of the Aerospace 
Building, L'Enfant Plaza, 901 D Street, SW., Washington, DC, on 
September 29, 1997, beginning at 8:30 a.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss topics and questions which 
may be recommended for inclusion on future Joint Board examinations in 
actuarial mathematics and methodology referred to in Title 29 U.S. 
Code, section 1242(a)(1)(B).
    A determination as required by section 10(d) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) has been made that the subject 
of the meeting falls within the exception to the open meeting 
requirement set forth in title 5 U.S. Code, section 552b(c)(9)(B), and 
that the public interest requires that such meeting be closed to public 
participation.

    Dated: September 8, 1997.
Robert I. Brauer,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, Joint Board for the Enrollment 
of Actuaries.
[FR Doc. 97-24998 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24509]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory 
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will 
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel of the 
Medical Devices Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and 
recommendations to the agency on FDA regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on October 6, 1997, 8:30 
a.m. to 5 p.m., and October 7, 1997, 8:30 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Location: Corporate Bldg., conference room 020B, 9200 Corporate 
Blvd., Rockville, MD.
    Contact Person: Elisa D. Harvey, Center for Devices and 
Radiological Health (HFZ-470), Food and Drug Administration, 9200 
Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850, 301-594-1180, or FDA Advisory 
Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the 
Washington, DC area), Obstetrics and Gynecology Devices Panel, code 
12524. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date information on 
this meeting.
    Agenda: On October 6, 1997, the committee will discuss and make 
recommendations on a premarket approval application for a thermal 
endometrial ablation device. On October 7, 1997, the committee will 
discuss and advise FDA on a petition for reclassification of home 
uterine activity monitors from class III (premarket approval) to class 
II (special controls).
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or 
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee. 
Written submissions may be made to the contact person by September 29, 
1997. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between 
approximately 8:30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. on October 6 and 7, 1997. Time 
allotted for each presentation may be limited. Those desiring to make 
formal oral presentations should notify the contact person before 
September 29, 1997, and submit a brief statement of the general nature 
of the evidence or arguments they wish to present, the names and 
addresses of proposed participants, and an indication of the 
approximate time required to make their presentation.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: September 8, 1997
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 97-24509 Filed 9-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4



                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                        INTEGRATED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.


         Integrated Security Systems, Inc., a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify that:

         FIRST: The name of the Corporation is Integrated Security Systems, Inc.

         SECOND: The Board of Directors of the Corporation, by the unanimous
written consent of its members, adopted a resolution proposing and declaring
advisable that the number of authorized shares of the Corporation's Common
Stock, par value $.01 per share, be increased from 18,000,000 shares to
30,000,000 by adopting the following amendment to the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation:

                  Article FOURTH shall be amended in its entirety as follows:

                  "FOURTH: The total number of shares of stock which the
         Corporation shall have authority to issue is 30,750,000 shares, of
         which 30,000,000 shares shall be Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
         ("Common Stock"), and 750,000 shares shall be Preferred Stock, par
         value $.01 per share ("Preferred Stock")."

         THIRD: The resolution adopted by the Board of Directors has been duly
adopted by vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Common Stock at
a Special Meeting of Stockholders called and held in accordance with the
provisions of Sections 211 and 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware, as an amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation.

         FOURTH: The aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
applicable provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Integrated Security Systems, Inc. has caused this
certificate to be signed by its President, as of May 1, 1997.

                                 INTEGRATED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.


                                 By:  /s/ Gerald K. Beckmann
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Gerald K. Beckmann
                                      President
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Naomi Miller, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Sussman &amp; Associates (Michael H. Sussman of counsel), for appellant.Orange County District Attorney (Andrew R. Kass of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Town of Wawayanda, Orange County (Timothy P. McElduff, Jr., J.), rendered June 7, 2017. The judgment convicted defendant, after a nonjury trial, of disorderly conduct, and imposed sentence.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>Defendant was charged in an accusatory instrument with disorderly conduct (Penal Law ยง 240.20 [5]). Following a nonjury trial, defendant was convicted as charged. </p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>People v Cromwell </i>(___ Misc 3d ____, 2019 NY Slip Op ____ [appeal No. 2017-1310 OR CR], decided herewith), the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>ADAMS, P.J., RUDERMAN and EMERSON, JJ., concur.</p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: June 13, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>