alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Oconee Financial Corporation (the                “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”)                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                May 14, 2007 | /s/                B. Amrey                Harden                                        B.                Amrey HardenChief                Executive Officer     |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| Dated:                May 14, 2007 | /s/                Jerry K.                Wages                                         Jerry                K. WagesChief                Financial Officer |
Page 1 of 4Page 2 of 4Page 3 of 4
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Dave & Buster’s, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the period ended February 4, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen M. King,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2007
|        |                    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | /s/ Stephen M. King     |   |
|   | Stephen M. King         |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
### Ground water in Cedar Rapids Division of Lower Platte River basin, Nebraska

By: James B. HylandCharles Franklin KeechPhilip G. Rosene

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1779H

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

In  connection with the  Report of International Commercial Television Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kelvin
Claney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Karl Redekopp,
Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that,  to  the  best  of  our  knowledge  and  belief:

1.   the Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   the information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

          Date: November 14, 2006

                                      Signed:  /s/  Kelvin  Claney
                                              ---------------------------
                                              President and Chief Executive
                                              Officer

                                      Signed:  /s/Karl  Redekopp
                                              ---------------------------
                                              Chief Financial Officer
#### Paul Hayward KOWALSKY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-423.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 9, 1978.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Douglas A. Wallace, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this case, the trial judge adjudicated appellant guilty of reckless driving, fleeing a police officer, and aggravated assault. He then imposed a sentence of three years imprisonment. We affirm the judgment, but we agree with appellant that his sentence contains two infirmities.

The three-year sentence is an illegal general sentence. *Dorfman v. State,*351 So.2d 954 (Fla.1977); *Darden v. State,*306 So.2d 581 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Also, the phrase “at hard labor” in the present sentence is improper. *Speller v. State,*305 So.2d 231 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). Therefore, we remand for resentencing and appellant need not be present for this purpose.

GRIMES, C. J., and SCHEB and RYDER, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Alternate Energy Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                         |     |                                           
|------------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------------
|Date: September 25, 2008 |    
|                         |     |                                           
|                         | By: | /s/ BLAINE FROATS                         
|                         |     | Blaine Froats                             
|                         |     | Chief Executive Officer                   
|Date: September 25, 2008 |     |                                           
|                         | By: | /s/ JACK WASSERMAN                        
|                         |     | Jack Wasserman                            
|                         |     | Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer
1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-1480

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Charles Floyd Shaw, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 21, 2007 Filed: November 28, 2007

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Charles Shaw pleaded guilty to posse ssing pseudoephedrine, knowing it would be used to manufacture a controlled substa nce, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(c)(2). The district court 1 sentenced Shaw to 30 months in prison, which was at the bottom of the advisory Guidelines range. On appeal, Shaw argues that the district court abused its discretion when it denied hi s motion for a downward departure based on overstated criminal history, and that a sentence below the Guidelines range would have been reasonable. We rej ect these arguments and affirm.-2- Because Shaw does not argue--and the recorddoes not indicate--that the district court failed to recognize it had authority to depart from the Guidelines, its discretionary denial of Shaw ’s motion is unreviewable. See United States v. Carter , 481 F.3d 601, 607 (8th Cir.), petitions for cert. filed , (U.S. July 11, 2007 & Sept. 7, 2007) (Nos. 07-5323, 07-330). Further, Shaw’s sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Garlewicz , 493 F.3d 933, 938 (8th Cir. 2007) (presumption of reasonableness is accorded sentence withinproperly calculated Guidelines range); United States v. Garate , 482 F.3d 1013, 1017 (8th Cir.) (c riminal history may support variance as part of de fendant’s history and characteristics under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(1), but primary reliance on factor s already considered by Guidelines will not support substantial variance unless they are present in unusual degree), petition for cert. filed , (U.S. June 28, 2007) (No. 07-5051); United States v. Rouillard , 474 F.3d 551, 558 (8th Cir. 2007) (“Significant variances based on conduct accounted for in the Guidelines results in unwarrant ed sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar conduct.”).
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

______________________________
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24614]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-725-000]

CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice of Application

September 11, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 5, 1997, CNG Transmission Corporation 
(CNG), 445 West Main Street, Clarksburg, West Virginia 26301, filed in 
Docket No. CP-97-725-000, an application pursuant to Section 7(b) of 
the Natural Gas Act for permission and approval to abandon its case-
specific authorization to provide storage services under CNG' Rate 
Schedule GSS-II to Colonial Gas Company (Colonial), effective as of 
September 1, 1997, all as more fully set forth in the application on 
file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    CNG asserts that it has replaced the services for which CNG seeks 
abandonment authorization with services to Colonial of like demand and 
capacity, under CNG's blanket authorization provided by Part 284 of the 
Commission's Regulations.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make protest with reference 
to said application should on or before October 2, 1997, file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, a motion 
to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). 
All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules.
    Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
finds that permission and approval for the proposed abandonment are 
required by the public convenience and necessity. If a motion for leave 
to intervene is timely filed, or if the Commission on its own motion 
believes that a formal hearing is required, further notice of such 
hearing will be duly given.
    Under the procedure provided for, unless otherwise advised, it will 
be unnecessary for CNG to appear or be represented at the hearing.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24614 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48227-48230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24287]



[[Page 48227]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 97-36]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Assistance Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/CPD, (703) 
604-6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 97-36, with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and sensitivity of technology pages.

    Dated: September 9, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5000-04-M

[[Page 48228]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15SE97.022



[[Page 48229]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15SE97.023



[[Page 48230]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15SE97.024



[FR Doc. 97-24287 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-C
Case 4:05-cv-02408-JEJ-DB Document 11 Filed 01/25/06 Page 1 of 5
Case 4:05-cv-02408-JEJ-DB Document 11 Filed 01/25/06 Page 2 of 5
Case 4:05-cv-02408-JEJ-DB Document 11 Filed 01/25/06 Page 3 of 5
Case 4:05-cv-02408-JEJ-DB Document 11 Filed 01/25/06 Page 4 of 5
Case 4:05-cv-02408-JEJ-DB Document 11 Filed 01/25/06 Page 5 of 5
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

OUDOM SOMEE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-10404

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00273-MMDGWF-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Miranda Du, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2014** 

San Francisco, California

Before: BEA, IKUTA, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Oudom Somee was charged with conspiracy to recruit straw buyers for real

property, help the buyers fill out fraudulent mortgage applications to obtain favorable

rates, and transfer some of the money escrowed during closings into bank accounts

FILED

SEP 24 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Somee controlled. Somee appeals his convictions for mail fraud, wire fraud, bank

fraud, and conspiracy. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm.

The district court excluded Somee’s expert witness, Dr. Kinsora, from testifying

about Somee’s claimed diminished mental capacity. The court’s ruling was based on

two grounds: first, Somee’s failure to provide a description of “the witness’s opinion,

the bases and reasons for those opinions, and the witness’s qualifications[,]” as

required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16; second, Somee’s failure to

demonstrate the reliability and soundness of the methodology employed by Dr.

Kinsora under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow

Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). On appeal, Somee provides no argument

that the district court erred in its Rule 16 ruling. The issue is therefore waived. This

court reviews “only issues which are argued specifically and distinctly in a party’s

opening brief. We will not manufacture arguments for an appellant . . . .” Greenwood

v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (citations omitted). Failure to comply with

Rule 16 was an independent and sufficient basis for exclusion of Dr. Kinsora’s

proposed testimony.

Somee also claims that the district court erred by not giving his proposed jury

instructions on diminished capacity. We conclude the district court did not abuse its

discretion, because the district court’s conclusion that there was insufficient evidence

2
to warrant such instructions was not illogical, implausible, or unsupported by the

record. United States v. Hinkson, 585 F.3d 1247, 1263 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc). 

Somee’s testimony about his childhood head injury and his poor English skills did not

suggest he was incapable of forming the requisite specific intent to commit the crimes. 

AFFIRMED.

3
#### LAR, INC. v. BANK OF LOUISIANA IN NEW ORLEANS.

No. 60072.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 2, 1977.

In re: Pringle-Associated Mortgage Corp. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans, 345 So.2d 517.

Writ denied. On the assignments of error the result is correct.

CALOGERO, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of ROO Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Petty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to ROO Group, Inc. and will be retained by ROO Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: November 15, 20004                       /s/ Robert Petty
                --                            ----------------------------------
                                              Name: Robert Petty
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### Ex parte Michael ROBINSON.

77-157.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 22, 1977.

ALMON, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2671 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2671

   To prohibit the Administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety 
    Administration from issuing a rule or promulgating a regulation 
requiring certain vehicles to be equipped with speed limiting devices, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2023

Mr. Daines (for himself, Mr. Thune, Mr. Lee, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Wicker, 
and Mr. Rounds) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the Administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety 
    Administration from issuing a rule or promulgating a regulation 
requiring certain vehicles to be equipped with speed limiting devices, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deregulating Restrictions on 
Interstate Vehicles and Eighteen-wheelers Act'' or the ``DRIVE Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING SPEED LIMITING DEVICES.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Administrator of 
the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration may not issue any rule 
or promulgate any regulation to require vehicles with a gross vehicle 
weight of more than 26,000 pounds operating in interstate commerce to 
be equipped with a speed limiting device set to a maximum speed.
                                 <all>
```