alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              10
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    10
<PP&E>                                           27000
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  214156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3702
<OTHER-SE>                                      207354
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    214156
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2133
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2133)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2133)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

y1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

143738

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143738 COA: 297659 MICHAEL PIERRE BROWN, Oakland CC: 2009-228699-FC Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
79–008 

111TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 111–17 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY THE BILL (H.R. 1) MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS 

FOR JOB PRESERVATION AND CREATION, INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT, ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND SCIENCE, ASSISTANCE TO THE UNEMPLOYED, AND STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL STABILIZATION, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2009, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2009 (legislative day of FEBRUARY 12, 2009).—Referred to the House 

Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 168] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 168, by a record vote of 9 to 4, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of the conference report 

to accompany H.R. 1, the ‘‘American Recovery and Reinvestment 

Act of 2009.’’ The resolution provides 90 minutes of debate on the 

conference report. 

The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 

the conference report except those arising under clause 9 of rule 

XXI and provides that the conference report shall be considered as 

read. The resolution waives all points of order against the conference report. This waiver does not affect the point of order available under clause 9 of rule XXI (regarding earmark disclosure). Finally, the resolution provides one motion to recommit, if applicable. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the conference report (except those arising under clause 9 of rule XXI) includes a waiver of clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring a three-day layover of conference reports and accompanying joint explanatory 

statements). Although the rule waives all points of order against 

the conference report, the Committee is not aware of any waivers 

against the conference report. The waiver of all points of order 

against the conference report is prophylactic. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with REPORTS
2 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 27 

Date: February 13, 2009 (legislative day of February 12, 2009). 

Measure: Conference report on H.R. 1. 

Motion by: Mr. McGovern. 

Summary of motion: To report the rule. 

Results: Adopted 9–4. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Yea; Hastings—Yea; Matsui—Yea; 

Cardoza—Yea; Arcuri—Yea; Perlmutter—Yea; Pingree—Yea; 

Polis—Yea; Dreier—Nay; Diaz-Balart—Nay; Sessions—Nay; Foxx— 

Nay; Slaughter—Yea. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with REPORTS
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.35    
  


TIME NOTE  


        For the value received, FORTEL Inc. promises to pay to the order of William M. Regitz, the sum of Fifty Thousand ($50,000.00) dollars, payable with
interest thereon at the rate of 18% per annum on the unpaid balance. 


        The
entire sum of principal and accrued interest shall be fully payable on October 1, 2001. 


        In
the event of default, FORTEL Inc. agrees to pay all reasonable attorney fees and costs of collection. 


        Signed
under seal this 3rd day of July, 2001. 



	

 	

FORTEL Inc.
	

 	

By:	
 	

/s/  ASA W. LANUM      
 Asa W. Lanum,

President & CEO
	

 	

By:	
 	

/s/  ROMEO R. DIZON      
 Romeo R. Dizon,

Acting CFO











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.35
November 15, 2013 CERTIFIED- RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Southern Region P.o. Box 20636 Atlanta, Georgia 30320 Attention: Christopher R. Stevenson Re: Tyler Pennywitt FAA Case No. 2012S0150128 In response to FAA complaint dated August 30, 2013

# RECE~\fED NOV 25 :Jl3 HEARING DOCKET

II. 1. On oraboutJune 4, 2012, at approximately 2230 local time,you aimed a beam of light from a laser pointer at aJacksonville Sheriffs Office {JSO) helicopterthat was flying near 4483 Hanover Park Drive, Jacksonville, Florida. Response: Deny 2. The conduct was deliberate. Response: Deny 3. The beam of light illuminated the cockpit ofthe J50 helicopter. Response: Without knowledge 4. The beam of light interfered with the crewmembers' performance oftheir duties aboard the aircraft. Response: Without Knowledge I do not believe it is right to be charged twice forthe same crime resulting fromthe same conduct. Sincerely,

# %L~_)Re~ TylerJ. Pennywitt

cc: Hearing Docket Clerk Honorable Judge J.E. Sullivan
# Distribution celebrates the life of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

/ Published Jan. 12, 2018
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, along with DLA Distribution’s Multicultural Committee, celebrated the life and legacy of Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr’s., during the second annual MLK program on Jan. 9.
The theme, “A day on, not a day off,” best captures the essence of King’s life. He was a man who devoted his life to the betterment of the world around him. He once said “Life’s most persistent and urgent question is: ’what are you doing for others?’”

DLA Distribution Susquehanna, commander, Army Col. Brad Eungard welcomed everyone in attendance, “I’m reminded of the second line of DDSP’s Command Vision which is focused on achieving Unity of Effort in the execution of our mission while also recognizing the strength of diversity in our workforce.  To honor Dr. King, let us truly work and live together well.”

Eungard then introduced the keynote speaker, Reverend Phillip Deal, pastor of the Beulah Baptist Church in Steelton, Pennsylvania. “Rev. Deal has a passion for leadership and organizational management. He is a man who recognizes the value of character and the importance of mentorship.”

Deal spoke a great in length about what kind of man King was. “MLK stressed the importance of working together, he felt we all had more in common than we believe.”

Deal, is a native of Princess Anne, Maryland, received his Master of Divinity from Howard University School of Divinity in Washington, D.C. 

The program also included a video presentation by Bruce Mayo and a presentation of “Drum Major for Justice,” by Jeremiah Christian. 

The event concluded with songs performed by the Susquehanna Township High School Gospel Choir.
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: August 21, 2012/s/   Cheung Wai Hung, EddieCheung Wai Hung, Eddie, Chief Financial Officer
254 La. 918

#### STATE of Louisiana, ex rel. Sam SMITH, Petitioner, v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, et al., Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50248.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1969.

In re: Sam Smith applying for writs of habeas corpus and certiorari.

Application denied — The showing made by relator does not entitle him to the relief sought.
Exhibit 4.1

                            CORONADO INDUSTRIES, INC.
                      16929 E. Enterprise Drive, Suite 202
                            Fountain Hills, AZ 85268


                                 January 1, 2002


Coronado Employees and Consultants,

     The  Company's  Board of  Directors  has decided to make  available  to all
employees and consultants,  shares of the Company's common stock at the price of
90% of the lowest  closing  bid price  during  the week prior to the  employee's
payday.

     To participate  in this program,  all you have to do is execute this letter
in the space below,  and indicate the amount of wages you wish to have allocated
to this Plan and the pay period from which your salary  will be  credited.  Your
free-trading shares will be delivered to you within a few days.


                                        Coronado Industries, Inc.


                                        By: /s/ Gary R. Smith
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Gary R. Smith, President



     --------------------------             --------------------------
     Amount of Wages                        Employee Signature


     --------------------------             --------------------------
     Pay Period From                        Name of Employee
     Which To Be Paid                       (Please Print)
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



                           The Med-Design Corporation

                  Certification by the Chief Financial Officer
          Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         I, Lawrence D. Ellis, Chief Financial Officer of The Med-Design
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to my
knowledge:

         (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                      * * *




Lawrence D. Ellis
-----------------------
Lawrence D. Ellis
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  March 10, 2004
#### J. W. HUTCHISON, Appellant, v. HARRELL’S GROVES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-517.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 8, 1970.

*143Sherwood L. Stokes, Haines City, for appellant.

James P. Hahn, of Hahn & Breathitt, Lakeland, for appellee.

MANN, Judge.

Hutchison answered appellee’s ejectment action by alleging title to about 80 of its acres by adverse possession. This claim rests upon their enclosure since 1922 within a large pasture which includes Hutchison’s other lands. The trouble is that he appended to his affidavit opposing summary judgment a sketch showing only that portion of his fence which traverses appellee’s land. Appellee’s officers filed an affidavit stating that “Defendant has not fenced the North, West, and South boundaries of the subject property, and has fenced only a portion of the East boundary of the subject property.” The trial judge took this to mean that the fence did not fully enclose the land and granted summary judgment for appellee. This would be proper if Hutchison were held to artistic accuracy, but the record shows that the sketch was not intended to show the entire fence, and that Hutchison is claiming, however artlessly, that appellee cannot enter the disputed land without crossing either Hutchi-son’s fence or a natural barrier which he alleges to be sufficient enclosure.

“Subject property” is shown by the entire record to be a highly ambiguous phrase. Hutchison’s fence need not be on the boundary of Harrell’s Groves’ parcel in order to perfect title by adverse possession. The semantic confusion which ap-pellee caused led an able trial judge into a misunderstanding of the conflicting allegations.

We accordingly reverse and remand for further proceedings.

LILES, A. C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
#### Fred Howard SEYMOUR, a/k/a Fred Seymour, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-851.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 30, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 21, 1971.

Leonard Moriber, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Brace L. Schemer, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Fred Howard Seymour, appeals from the judgment and sentence of the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Florida entered by the court after appellant was found guilty in a non-jury trial of buying, receiving or concealing stolen property.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding him guilty because there was insufficient evidence adduced to support the conviction. We do not agree with appellant’s contention.

The necessary ingredient of the offense of receiving stolen property, knowing it to have been stolen, is knowledge on the receiver’s part at the time he receives the thing stolen, that the property is stolen, or of such fact as would put a person of ordinary intelligence and caution on inquiry.

 The record shows that there was conflicting evidence; however, it is a fundamental principle that an appellate court does not sit as a trier of fact. Where there are conflicts in the evidence in a non-jury trial, it is within the province of the trial judge to reject any testimony he finds to be untrue and accept and rely upon that which he finds to be worthy of belief. Hoover v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 95.

No reversible error having been made to appear, the judgment and sentence appealed are affirmed.

Affirmed.
### Profile surveys in Wenatchee River basin, Washington

By: Robert Bradford Marshall

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp368

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate- 1**                            (1778 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 1**                            (3106 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 1**                            (2555 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 1**                            (3281 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 1**                            (2717 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 1**                            (2400 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 1**                            (2913 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 1**                            (2107 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of KIT digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Hirst,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(3)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(4)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Date:
      June 23, 2009
              
              /s/
      Jonathan HirstJonathan
      Hirst
                Chief
      Financial Officer
Case 4:06-cv-00335-MM Document 8 Filed 05/23/06 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Thiscertification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose ofsatisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Ezenia! Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin M. Hackett,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date: March  23, 2009 |   | /s/ Kevin M.  Hackett    |
|-----------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                  |   | Kevin M.  Hackett        |
|                  |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit







Exhibit 10.1
Waiver Letter


November 23, 2015


Thomas K Equels, President
HEMISPHERX BIOPHARMA, INC.
One Penn Center
1617 JFK Boulevard
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 


Dear Mr. Equels,


For the purpose of assisting Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc. (the “Company”) in preserving cash and to help the Company to ensure its commercialization goals for Ampligen and Alferon-N, effective November 23, 2015 I waive my rights under Section 3(c)(ii) of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and me entered into as of December 6, 2011 to any future payment of any incentive bonus related to the sale of the Company’s stock or other securities by, or on behalf of, the Company pursuant to the Equity Distribution Agreement between the Company and Maxim Group LLC, dated July 23, 2012, as amended (the “Maxim Agreement”), or any similar or successor ATM equity distribution agreement. I make this waiver for the sole and exclusive purpose of assisting the Company in reaching its commercialization goals and do so without making any admissions concerning the scope of my rights under Section 3(c)(ii) of the Employment Agreement or the propriety of any consideration I previously have received thereunder.  


/s/ Willaim A. Carter
Dr. William A. Carter
Waiver Acknowledged:
HEMISPHERX BIOPHARMA, INC.


By:   /s/ Thomas K. Equels    
        Thomas K. Equels, CFO


cc: Peter Rodino, William Mitchell, Iraj E Kiani

Corporate Headquarters
One Penn Center, 1617 JFK Blvd, Suite 500, Philadelphia, PA 19103                t: 215-988-0080       f: 215-988-1739
Manufacturing  
783 Jersey Ave, New Brunswick, NJ 08901                          www.hemispherx.net                   t: 732-249-3250       f: 732-249-6895
Shipping:  5 Jules Lane, New Brunswick, NJ 08901