alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM
10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              49
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      844
<ALLOWANCES>                                        56
<INVENTORY>                                        676
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,013
<PP&E>                                          11,545
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,070
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,716
<OTHER-SE>                                         124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,815
<SALES>                                         12,867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,155
<CGS>                                            8,337
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  85
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (529)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (149)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (380)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (380)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        

</TABLE>
Case 4:05-cr-00412-JEJ Document 13 Filed 01/18/06 Page 1 of 1
[Cite as In re G.B., 2016-Ohio-3001.]

COURT OF APPEALS 

TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO 

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

IN THE MATTER OF G.B., C.B., and L.B. : JUDGES: 

 : Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, P.J. 

 : Hon. John W. Wise, J. 

 : Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J. 

 : 

 : 

 : Case No. 2015 AP 07 0035 

 : 

 : O P I N I O N 

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Tuscarawas County 

Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile 

Division, Case No. 14JN00093 

JUDGMENT: Affirmed 

DATE OF JUDGMENT: May 13, 2016 

APPEARANCES: 

For Plaintiff-Appellee For Defendants-Appellants 

 David and Diana Black 

KAREN ROSS QUINLAN 

Tuscarawas County Job and Family Services DAVID AND DIANA BLACK, pro se 

389 16th Street, SW. 40590 Twp. Rd. 64B 

New Philadelphia, Ohio 44663 Dresden, Ohio 43821 

 
Tuscarawas County, Case No. 2015 AP 07 0035 2 

Baldwin, J.

{¶1} Appellants David and Diana Black appeal a judgment of the Tuscarawas 

County Common Pleas Court, Juvenile Division, awarding legal custody of their children 

C.B. and L.B. to appellants’ adult daughter and her husband.1 Appellee is Tuscarawas 

County Job and Family Services. 

{¶2} C.B. and L.B. were initially placed in foster care in March of 2014. Appellee 

became involved with the family upon the filing of an adult protective services case 

concerning the maternal grandmother of the children, who was living in the home. The 

children were eventually placed with their older sister and her husband. Following a 

hearing in the Tuscarawas County Common Pleas Court, Juvenile Division, the court 

found that the children were doing well in the home of their sister, and appellants had 

made virtually no progress on their case plan. The court therefore granted legal custody 

of the children to their sister and brother-in-law, and terminated appellee’s involvement 

with the family. 

{¶3} Appellants have not set forth assignments of error in their brief, although 

they have set forth an argument setting forth their reasons as to why the judgment of the 

court was in error. However, the claimed errors rely for their validity on the existence of 

a transcript of the proceedings in the trial court, which was not provided to this Court as 

required by App. R. 9(B). “When portions of the transcript necessary for resolution of 

assigned errors are omitted from the record, the reviewing court has nothing to pass upon 

 1

 G.B. turned eighteen years of age during the pendency of the case, and was therefore not subject to the 

legal custody order. 
Tuscarawas County, Case No. 2015 AP 07 0035 3 

and thus, as to those assigned errors, the court has no choice but to presume the validity 

of the lower court's proceedings, and affirm.” Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories, 61 Ohio 

St.2d 197, 199, 400 N.E.2d 384, 385 (1980). 

{¶4} We overrule appellants’ claimed errors as set forth in the argument section 

of their brief. The judgment of the Tuscarawas County Common Pleas Court, Juvenile 

Division, is affirmed. Costs are assessed to appellants. 

By: Baldwin, J. 

Farmer, P.J. and 

Wise, J. concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48290-48291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24335]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Cooperative Agreements to Conduct Research on the 
Diagnosis and Pathogenesis of Lyme Disease in the United States, 
Program Announcement 800: Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following committee meeting.

    Name: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control 
SEP: Cooperative Agreements to Conduct Research on the Diagnosis and 
Pathogenesis of Lyme Disease in the United States, Program 
Announcement 800.
    Time and Dates: 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m., October 6-7, 1997.
    Place: Holiday Inn Conference Center, 130 Clairemont Avenue, 
Decatur, Georgia 30030.
    Status: Open: 8:30 a.m.-9:15 a.m., October 6, 1997. Closed: 9:15 
a.m. October 6, 1997, through 4:30 p.m. October 7, 1997.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to 
Program Announcement 800.
    Portions of this meeting will be closed to the public in 
accordance with provisions set forth in section 552b(c) (4) and (6), 
Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Associate Director for 
Management and Operations, CDC, pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463.
    Contact Person For More Information: Edwarda Lee, M.P.A., 
Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, National Center

[[Page 48291]]

for Infectious Diseases, CDC, M/S P02/MLR, P.O. Box 2087 (Foothills 
Campus), Fort Collins, Colorado 80522, telephone 970/221-6415.

    Dated: September 8, 1997.
Carolyn J. Russell,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 97-24335 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 64892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-27061]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 202 / Wednesday, October 19, 2011 / 
Notices

[[Page 64892]]

AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION

Board of Directors Meeting

    Time: Tuesday, October 25, 2011, 8:45 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Place: African Development Foundation, Conference Room, 1400 I 
Street, NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005.
    Date: Tuesday, October 25, 2011.
    Status:
    1. Open session, Tuesday, October 25, 2011, 8:45 a.m. to 12 p.m.; 
and
    2. Closed session, Tuesday, October 25, 2011, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m.
    Due to security requirements and limited seating, all individuals 
wishing to attend the open session of the meeting must notify Sarah 
Conway at (202) 233-8811 or sconway@usadf.gov of your request to attend 
by 5 p.m. on October 21, 2011.

Lloyd O. Pierson,
President & CEO, USADF.
[FR Doc. 2011-27061 Filed 10-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6117-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EG97-73-000]


Zond Windsystem Partners, Ltd. Series 85-B (a California Limited 
Partnership); Notice of Amendment to Application for Determination of 
Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

August 26, 1997.
    On August 18, 1997 Zond Windsystem Partners, Ltd., Series 85-B, a 
California Limited Partnership, 13000 Jameson Road, Tehachapi, 
California 93561, filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
an amendment to its application, previously filed June 27, 1997.
    Any person desiring to be heard concerning the application for 
exempt wholesale generator status should file a motion to intervene or 
comments with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Secs. 385.211 
and 385.214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. The 
Commission will limit its consideration of comments to those that 
concern the adequacy or accuracy of the application. All such motions 
and comments should be filed on or before September 8, 1997 and must be 
served on applicant. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23140 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 60323 Summary Calendar

**Dean C. Boyd,**

Plaintiff

— Appellant **,**

versus
**Justin Gower; Chrislind Charenzenke,**

Defendants

— Appellees

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:18

- CV

- 509

Before **Smith, Stewart,** and **Graves,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** * Dean C. Boyd, Mississippi prisoner # 167698, appeals the summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint due to the failure to exhaust available administrative remedies.

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 1, 2022 Lyl e W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-60323 Document: 00516264184 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/01/2022No. 20

- 60323

2 We review the grant of summary judgment for failure to exhaust de
novo and a ppl y the same standard as the district court. Dillon v. Rogers , 596 F.3d 260, 266 (5th Cir. 2010). Summary judgment is proper “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” **Fed. R. Civ. P.** 56(a).

Section 1983 complaint s challenging prison conditions ha ve been properly exhausted when the plaintiff “‘complete[d] the administrative review process in accordance with the applicable procedural rules.’” Jones v. Bock , 549 U.S. 199, 21 8 (2007) (quoting Woodford v. Ngo , 548 U.S. 81, 88 (2006)). We take judicial notice of the Administrative Remedy Program (ARP) adopted by the Mississippi Department of Corrections and posted on its website in the inmate handbook. See Coleman v. Dretke , 409 F.3d 665, 667 (5th Cir. 2005).
Boyd has not raised a genuine dispute regarding his exhaustion of
administrative reme dies as he concede d that he did not pursue his grievance through the two

- step process before filing his complaint

. See Gonzalez v.
Seal , 702 F.3d 785, 788 (5th Cir. 2012). His argument that he satisfied the
ARP process is belied by the record. Furthermore , Boyd cannot be excused from the exhaustion requirement as it is mandatory and not subject to exceptions based on the circumstances in individual cases. See Jones , 549 U.S. at 211

. He has not raised a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the prison grievance procedures are so opaque that they are “incapable of
use.” Ross v. Blake , 578 U.S. 632, 643 (2016)

. We decline to consider Boyd’s argument raised for the first time on appeal that he later filed multipl e grievances relating to the events that are the subject of this lawsuit and pursued those grievances to the conclusion of the ARP process

. See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co. , 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999)

. **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 20-60323 Document: 00516264184 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/01/2022
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1989 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 57 Rolfe Square in Cranston, Rhode Island, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Holly A. Charette 

Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 1989 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. HOLLY A. CHARETTE POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 57 Rolfe Square in Cranston, 

4 Rhode Island, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Holly A. Charette Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Holly A. Charette 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the Senate November 18, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
No. 99-8022.

#### Nelson *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, William Whittle, President and Chief Executive Officer of General Gold Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of General Gold Corporation for the nine month period ended January 31, 1004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of General Gold Corporation.

Dated: March 10, 2004

/s/ William WhittleWilliam Whittle
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to General Gold Corporation and will be retained by General Gold Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Úradný vestník C 140I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 140I |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 6421. apríla 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 140I

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 6421. apríla 2021

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | Korigendá |
| | Korigendum k oznamu Európskej agentúry pre bezpečnosť a ochranu zdravia pri práci (EU-OSHA), Bilbao – Oznámenie o voľnom pracovnom mieste na pozíciu výkonného riaditeľa/výkonnej riaditeľky (Dočasný zamestnanec – platová trieda AD 14) – COM/2020/20049 ( Ú. v. EÚ C 171 A, 19.5.2020 ) | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

Korigendá

Korigendum k oznamu Európskej agentúry pre bezpečnosť a ochranu zdravia pri práci (EU-OSHA), Bilbao – Oznámenie o voľnom pracovnom mieste na pozíciu výkonného riaditeľa/výkonnej riaditeľky (Dočasný zamestnanec – platová trieda AD 14) – COM/2020/20049 ( Ú. v. EÚ C 171 A, 19.5.2020 )

( Ú. v. EÚ C 171 A, 19.5.2020 )

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

Korigendá

| 21.4.2021 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | CI 140/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2021

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

CI 140/1

---

Korigendum k oznamu Európskej agentúry pre bezpečnosť a ochranu zdravia pri práci (EU-OSHA), Bilbao – Oznámenie o voľnom pracovnom mieste na pozíciu výkonného riaditeľa/výkonnej riaditeľky (Dočasný zamestnanec – platová trieda AD 14) – COM/2020/20049

(
  Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 171 A z 19. mája 2020
  )

(2021/C 140 I/01)

Na strane 4 v odseku 6:

namiesto:

„Predtým ako správna rada vymenuje jedného z uchádzačov zaradených do užšieho zoznamu, budú uchádzači vyzvaní, aby zodpovedali otázky príslušných útvarov Rady a výboru Európskeho parlamentu. Európsky parlament a Rada Európskej únie potom zaujmú stanoviská a určia poradie uchádzačov podľa úspešnosti. Správna rada vymenuje výkonného riaditeľa po zohľadnení týchto stanovísk.“

má byť:

„Vybraný kandidát sa vyzve, aby vystúpil pred Európskym parlamentom a odpovedal na otázky jeho poslancov.“

---
EXHIBIT 32

   Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
            pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bancorp International Group, Inc. a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June
30, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge and upon a review
of the Report that:

(1)      the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully
         complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act;
         and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

This certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities as
Chief Executive Officer, my own due diligence and representations made by
certain members of the Company's senior management.


Dated: January 13, 2006                       /s/ Tom Megas
                                                  ---------------------------
                                                  Tom Megas
                                                  Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### OPINION OF THE CLERK, SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.

No. 7.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 21, 1977.

SENTELL, Clerk.

RULE 3(A), ALABAMA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION FACILITIES TO BE FURNISHED BY COUNTIES

Mr. Charles Y. Cameron, Administrative Director of Courts, has requested my opinion as Clerk of the Supreme Court, pursuant to Section 6-105, Act No. 1205, Acts of Alabama, 1975 Regular Session, as follows:

> (1) Does the word, “utilities,” in Rule 3(A) of the Alabama Rules of Judicial Administration include telephone service and, if so, does this include long distance telephone service?

> (2) Does Rule 3(A) of the Alabama Rules of Judicial Administration preclude counties from charging the state a rental for space occupied by the courts in county courthouses?

In my opinion, each of these questions should be answered in the affirmative.

Section 6.11 of the Judicial Article (Amendment 328 to the Constitution of Alabama) grants to the Supreme Court the power to make and promulgate rules governing the administration of all courts. The pertinent part of Rule 3, Alabama Rules of Judicial Administration, is as follows:

> (A) Physical Facilities. — Counties shall furnish and maintain courtrooms and offices for court officials and employees, including judges, clerks, registers and district attorneys, utilities and other necessary facilities for state courts in accord-*309anee with standards prescribed by the administrative director of courts (ADC).

A “utility” in the context of Rule 3(A) is “a service provided by a public utility.” Webster’s Third New International Dictionary.

A telephone company is a public utility. *Pike v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.,*263 Ala. 59, 81 So.2d 254 (1955); *Mickwee v. Boteler, et al.,*265 Ala. 544, 93 So.2d 151. See also 73 C.J.S. Public Utilities § 1 (1951).

Telephone service includes long-distance toll charges, extension telephones and like facilities. Attorney General of Alabama, Quarterly Reports, Vol. 102, pp. 24, 25 (1961).

The word, “furnish,” means “to provide or supply with what is needed, useful or desirable . . . equip.” Webster’s Third New International Dictionary (1971).

The word, “maintain,” means “to keep in a state of repair, efficiency or validity; preserve from failure or decline ... to provide for; bear the expense of.” Webster’s Third New International Dictionary (1971).

There is no provision in Rule 3(A) for the State to pay counties for the use of courtrooms and offices for court officials and employees.

In my opinion, the requirement that “counties shall furnish and maintain courtrooms and offices for court officials and employees . . . ” precludes counties from charging the State a rental for space occupied by the courts in county courthouses.
#### Mrs. Patricia Lee Sherwood, widow of Edmond P. SNELL et al. v. Mrs. Mercedes STEIN, a/k/a Mrs. Mercedes Stein Miorana, et al. Mrs. Patricia Lee Sherwood, widow of Edmond P. SNELL v. BENEFICIAL FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 60083.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 2, 1977.

In re: Mrs. Patricia Lee Sherwood, widow of Edmond P. Snell, et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson, 345 So.2d 522.

Application denied. On the facts found, no error of law in the court of appeal judgment.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Arthur BAILEY, Sr.

No. 59652.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 20, 1977.

Barry F. Viosca, New Orleans, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.