alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 189 (Tuesday, September 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 51132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25311]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[ES-030-07-1430-01; ILES-31854]


Notice of Realty Action: Recreation and Public Purposes Transfer 
of Public Land in Kane County, Illinois

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of realty action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following land has been found suitable for sale under 
authority of the Recreation and Public Purposes Act of 1926. The land 
will not be transferred until at least 60 days after the date of this 
notice.

Illinois Meridian, Kane County, Illinois

T.10 N., R.8 E.
    Sec. 10, Lots 1 and 5.

    Containing 0.28 acres and 0.89 acres, respectively.

    The land described is hereby segregated from appropriation under 
the public land laws, including the mining laws, pending disposition of 
this action or 270 days from the date of publication of this notice, 
whichever occurs first.
    These parcels will be transferred to the Kane County Forest 
Preserve District under the Recreation and Public Purposes Act of 1926 
(43 U.S.C. 869, et seq.). The mineral interest will not be conveyed.
    The patent, when issued, will contain certain reservations to the 
United States. Detailed information concerning these reservations, as 
well as specific conditions of the sale, are available for review at 
the Bureau of Land Management, Milwaukee Field Office, 310 West 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 450, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

DATES: Interested parties may submit comments until November 14, 1997. 
In the absence of timely objections, this proposal shall become the 
final determination of the Department of the Interior.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to: Bureau of Land Management, 
Milwaukee Field Office, P.O. Box 631, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201-0631.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard Levine, Planning and 
Environmental Coordinator, Milwaukee Field Office, (414) 297-4463.

    Dated: September 18, 1997.
James W. Dryden,
Field Office Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-25311 Filed 9-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
#### FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION, Petitioner, v. John P. WALSH, Respondent.

No. EE-93.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 2, 1977.

Raymond W. Gearey, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Jerry G. Traynham of Patterson & Black, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks reversal of the final order of the Florida Division of Administrative Hearings of October 29,1976, that held petitioner’s Administrative Directive Number 19 to be a rule within the purview of Section 120.52(14), Florida Statutes (1975). The provisions of the directive come within the operation of Section 120.52, Florida Statutes. It was not adopted as a rule as required, and is therefore void. The constitutional measurement or applications of the directive is not properly before the court.

The petition is denied.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION,

Respondent

v.

RACHEL L. MCBRIDE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 206 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STEPHON MARSH, :

:

Petitioner :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-13-1887

:

SCI-CHESTER, : (Judge Brann)

:

Respondent :

ORDER

April 14, 2015

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT:

1. Marsh’s habeas corpus petition is DISMISSED. 

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

3. Based on the Court’s conclusion herein, there is no basis

for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

1

Case 4:13-cv-01887-MWB-JVW Document 14 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 1
Central Co-operative Bank
 Senior Management Incentive Compensation Plan
 Fiscal 2011




---



##### 



CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK
Somerville, Massachusetts
   1.
    
    The plan is competitive compared with similar sized banks and the banking
industry in general.2.
    
    The Board of Directors controls all aspects of the Plan3.
    
    The Plan is directed at the Banks senior executives4.
    
    The financial criterion necessary for plan operation consists of achievement of
specified levels of ROAA5.
    
    Incentive distributions range from 0% of base salary (did not meet goal) to 24%
of base salary (maximum performance of plan).6.
    
    Award distribution would be made during the fiscal 2012 for fiscal 2011
performance.7.
    
    The categories of incentive plan participants and the related bonus range are
as follows:
 Position:
    
    Range of Bonus Awards:CEO & President
    
    
    0% - 24%Senior Vice Presidents
    
    
    0% - 18%
 1




---



##### 



CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK
Somerville, Massachusetts
 Fiscal 2011 Performance Goals
  1.)
    
    Meet or exceed a ROAA (Return on Average Assets) of .40%2.)
    
    In calculating ROAA, net income for the year excludes the following items: any
gains or losses on the sale or write-down of investment securities and bonus expense
calculated under this plan and any other bonus plan for the benefit of exempt
employees, all as computed on an after-tax basis.
 2




---



##### 



CENTRAL BANK
Somerville, Massachusetts
Distribution of Awards
 
 ROAA
    
    Bonus %0.40%
    
    
    4.00
    %0.45
    
    
    9.000.50
    
    
    14.000.55
    
    
    19.000.60
    
    
    24.00
 
 ROAA
    
    Bonus %0.40%
    
    
    4.00
    %0.45
    
    
    7.500.50
    
    
    11.000.55
    
    
    14.500.60
    
    
    18.00
  3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES W. SMITH,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 443 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### Commonwealth of Pennsylvania *v.*Ungerer.

Argued October 16, 1933.

Before Trexler, P. J., Keller, Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker and James, JJ.

*Franlclin E. Barr,*Assistant District Attorney, and with him *Charles F. Kelley,*District Attorney, for appellant.

*G. Von Phul Jones,*for appellee.

February 1, 1934:

Opinion by

James, J.,

The defendant was indicted on September 20, 1932 for having on the 20th day of September, 1928 aided and abetted one Alexander D. Bobinson, vice-president and treasurer of the Northwestern Trust Company, in the embezzlement, abstraction and wilful mis-' *462application of certain funds of the Northwestern Trust Company. Defendant was not an officer, director, receiver, superintendent, manager, broker, attorney, agent, employee, or member of said banking institution. Defendant moved to quash and the motion was sustained, from which order an appeal was taken by the Commonwealth. '

Thq same question raised in this appeal is involved in the appeal of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Russell H. Foster, 111 Pa. Superior Ct. 451, No. 356, October Term, 1933, in which an opinion has this day been filed sustaining the action of the court below in quashing the indictment. For the reasons therein set forth the judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Thomasville Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stephen H. Cheney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                        
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Stephen H. Cheney                                  
|    |  | Stephen H. Cheney                                      
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                  
|    |  | March 30, 2007                                         
|    |  | (principal executive, financial and accounting officer)
#### Lottie WINGO, Petitioner, v. CHRIS CRAFT CORPORATION, Home Indemnity Company and the Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 40793.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 19, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BING ZE DING, :

: Civil Action No. 4:CV-05-947

Petitioner :

:

v. :

: (Judge McClure)

BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION :

AND : (Magistrate Judge Blewitt)

CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, et al. :

: A 79 735 410

Respondents. :

O R D E R

June 21, 2005

BACKGROUND:

On May 9, 2005, petitioner Bing Ze Ding, a former inmate in the custody of

ICE detained at York County Prison, York, Pennsylvania, filed a petition for writ of

habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The petition challenged Ding’s continued

detention by ICE and sought only release from ICE custody under an order of

supervision. The matter was initially assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M.

Blewitt.

On May 11, 2005, Magistrate Judge Blewitt ordered respondents to show

cause within twenty (20) days why the writ of habeas corpus should not be issued. 

Case 4:05-cv-00947-JFM Document 8 Filed 06/21/05 Page 1 of 2
2

On May 31, 2005, respondents provided notice of Ding’s release from custody. 

Therefore, Ding has received the relief he requested.

On June 3, 2005, Magistrate Judge Blewitt issued a thorough five-page report

and recommendation on the matter recommending that Ding’s petition for writ of

habeas corpus be dismissed as moot. Ding has filed no objections to the report

and recommendation.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Magistrate Judge Blewitt’s June 3, 2005 Report and Recommendation is

adopted in whole for the reasoning set forth therein. (Rec. Doc. No. 7.)

2. Ding’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is

dismissed as moot. (Rec. Doc. No. 1.)

3. The clerk is directed to close the case file docketed to Civil Action No.

4:CV-05-947.

 s/ James F. McClure, Jr. 

James F. McClure, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 4:05-cv-00947-JFM Document 8 Filed 06/21/05 Page 2 of 2
#### Daryle A. EDISON, Appellant, v. Robert G. EDISON, Appellee.

No. M-374.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Jan. 15, 1970.

Isham W. Adams, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Walter A. Shelley, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this divorce proceeding the defendant wife seeks review by interlocutory appeal of an order granting to plaintiff husband the custody pendente lite of the four-year-old daughter born of the marriage.

Appellant first charges that the trial court abused its discretion and acted contrary to established principles of law when it awarded temporary custody of the minor child to appellee. A careful review of the evidence adduced before the court at both of the hearings held on the custody motion fails to suport appellant’s contention. As happens so frequently in cases of this kind, the evidence is in sharp conflict as to which disposition will serve the best interest of the child. The trial judge heard and observed the parties and witnesses, and reached a decision in the exercise of the broad and sound discretion vested in him by law. We find no proper cause to disagree with his conclusions or substitute our judgment for his.1

Appellant also questions the correctness of the trial court’s ruling which excluded certain evidence proffered by her at the second custody hearing. We agree that under the issues drawn by the pleadings and the evidence adduced, the testimony proffered by appellant was irrelevant and immaterial. The ruling sustaining appellee’s objection was proper and will not be disturbed.

Interlocutory appeal is dismissed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

1

. Allbritton v. Carraway, (Fla.App.1968) 215 So.2d 69; Friedman v. Friedman, (Fla.1958) 100 So.2d 167.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: TypeIV solar radio bursts, geomagnetic storms, and polar cap absorption (PCA)events**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:8/3
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001068628
 
September 4, 2018
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Skystar Bio-Pharmaceutical Company, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Weibing Lu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
 
 /s/ Weibing LuWeibing Lu

Chief Executive Officer

May 23, 2011
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Image Sensing System, Inc.
(the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gregory R. L. Smith,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies
 with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934; and                               
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained
 in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
 condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Gregory R. L. Smith
| |                        
| | Gregory R. L. Smith    
| | Chief Financial Officer
| | March 24,
 2011        

54

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Annualreport to Congress on the Assistive Technology Act of 1998 for fiscal years...**
 
2004-05 | 2006| 2007-08 | 2009-10
 
SuDoc Number:ED 1.202: AS 7/2/
Item Number:0529 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001079306
 
September 7, 2018
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.51


              AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

         AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE PURCHASE AGREEMENT ("AGREEMENT")
dated as of March 15, 2001 between the U.S. Plastic Lumber Corp. (the
"Company"), and Stout Partnership, a New Jersey Partnership (the "INVESTORS")

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, U.S. Plastic Lumber Corp. (the "Company") and the Investors
have heretofore entered into a Convertible Debenture Agreement on December 1,
2000 in the aggregate amount of $5,000,000; and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Investors are desirous of amending the
Convertible Debenture Agreement to extend the due date of the debentures; and

         WHEREAS, the Investors are major shareholders in the Company and derive
economic benefit from the success of the Company, and

         WHEREAS, the Investors are willing to execute this Amendment;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the
covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

1.       MATURITY DATE. The Maturity Date as defined in the Convertible
         Debenture Agreement shall be amended to be July 1, 2002 as opposed to
         December 1, 2001.

2.       MISCELLANEOUS. All remaining terms of the Convertible Debenture
         Purchase Agreement and related agreements between the Company and
         Investors are unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect. This
         Agreement shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance
         with the laws of the State of Florida. This Agreement may be executed
         in two or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered on and
         the same agreement, it being understood that all parties need not sign
         the same counterpart.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
         executed on the date first written above.

                                              STOUT PARTNERSHIP

                                              --------------------------
                                              Gary J. Ziegler
                                              Title: Managing Partner

                                              U.S. Plastic Lumber Corp.

                                              ----------------------------
                                              Bruce C. Rosetto, Secretary
LORENZA S. SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3749

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 5, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
# Benjamin “Gil” Perkins inducted as the 2018 Hall of Fame recipient

/ Published Oct. 2, 2018
Richmond, Va., 
For his dedicated service and contributions to Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, Benjamin “Gil” Perkins, former DLA Aviation chief counsel was inducted into the 2018 DLA Aviation Hall of Fame Sept. 27. Perkins retired in 2015 after 34 years of service.

The ceremony was held Thursday afternoon in the Frank B. Lotts Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia.  DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Linda Hurry opened the ceremony, making note of Perkins’s many contributions during his time at DSCR. “There is no question that Gil’s dedication to this team helped shape this center, touching the lives of many people throughout our center, from the time he started here in March 1981 until his retirement in October 2015, and beyond,” Hurry said.

Perkins’s tenure at DSCR and DLA Aviation began with services as a law clerk while was still attending the T.C. Williams School of Law at the University of Richmond. He then served as an attorney-advisor at DSCR, and later in a rotational assignment as business manager for the Packaged Petroleum, Chemicals, Gases and Rings, Shims & Spacers Product Center — a $120 million venture. In 2006, he was promoted to chief counsel for DLA Aviation at DSCR, a position he held until retirement.

Julia Roquemore, Aviation and Airframes division chief, Supplier Operations Commodities Directorate, DLA Aviation and Brenda Brunner, supervisory paralegal specialist, DLA Counsel-Aviation, nominated Perkins. 

Roquemore said the reason she nominated Perkins was because he cared more than anyone. “He was a champion of improving the quality of life for all DLA Aviation employees,” said Roquemore. “He took time to listen to people. He was a true champion of DLA Aviation.”

Perkins’s accomplishments while at DSCR include leading the office to establish and create a workload-tracking and case management database that served as the model for the DLA Counsel enterprise wide Automated Workflow and Reporting System, better known as AWARS.

“Gil’s legacy has impacted our mission, set examples for employees and introduced enduring benefits to the organization,” Hurry said. “He called DLA his dream job that fell right in with two of his life goals: serving people and supporting his country.”

The event was attended by his wife, Susan, who also worked at DLA Aviation and retired shortly before her husband after 30 years of service. One of Perkins’s four daughters—Lauren Freeman, also attended, as well as Perkins’s father, Hugh, and his sister Mary Perkins. 

The DLA Aviation Hall of Fame recognizes former civilian and military team members who have made significant and lasting contributions to the agency and who represent core DLA values and ideals. Perkins is the 36th inductee into the Hall of Fame.

Perkins said, “Don’t just go to work, go to serve, to appreciate the privilege we’ve been given, to accept the responsibility that goes with the privilege and to continue to do great things.”