alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsArea estimation using multiyear designs and partial crop identificationStatistical procedures were developed for large area assessments using both satellite and conventional data. Crop acreages, other ground cover indices, and measures of change were the principal characteristics of interest. These characteristics are capable of being estimated from samples collected possibly from several sources at varying times, with different levels of identification. Multiyear analysis techniques were extended to include partially identified samples; the best current year sampling design corresponding to a given sampling history was determined; weights reflecting the precision or confidence in each observation were identified and utilized, and the variation in estimates incorporating partially identified samples were quantified.Document ID19840018031Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSielken, R. L., Jr.*(Texas A&M Univ. College Station, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1984Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:171785NASA-CR-171785E84-10151Accession Number84N26099Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-16785Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840018031.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000943906
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND V, SERIES 4
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 24, 2021

No. 04-20-00212-CR

Felipe NEGRETE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-05-13279-CR

Honorable Camile Glasscock Dubose, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellee’s motion for an extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. Appellee’s 

brief was filed on February 22, 2021.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of February, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### Succession of Harmon A. BARRON et ux. Succession of Harmon A. Barron et ux. (Luella Oden).

No. 60088.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 6, 1977.

In re: Misses Mattie L. Barron and Cloma Barron, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster. 345 So.2d 998.

Writ denied. No error of law.
# DLA Police participate in National Night Out 

/ Published Aug. 2, 2017
Richmond, Va, 
The Chesterfield community sees them driving around behind the fenced gates of Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. They wear the same badge and uphold the same laws as the other local policing agencies, but who are these mysterious officers defending the peace of the installation? The Defense Logistics Agency Installation Support at Richmond’s police introduced their agency to the community during Chesterfield County’s National Night Out at the Bensley Park and Community Building Aug 1. 

“We border on everyone’s back yard,” said Chad Tearne, chief of police, DLA Installation Support at Richmond. “They see us every day through the fence, but they can’t come on the installation, so we really wanted to bring what was inside the gate outside of the gate to the community.”

The community event brought together all of the local policing bodies in the greater Richmond area to reach out to the community, discuss safety and build camaraderie.  

“This is great for the community as a whole and all of the policing bodies,” said Tearne. “We can bond with our policing partners while reaching out to the community. This is a win for everyone.” 

The DLA police set up a station to distribute ChildPrint ID kits and “deputized” young citizens with plastic DLA badges to uphold safe practices such as calling 9-1-1 when there is an emergency. 

“Our department thought it would be valuable to purchase some child ID kits,” said Tearne. “These kits include everything you need if the unthinkable happens and your child goes missing.” He explained the kits included a bag for hair and saliva samples as well as dental records and fingerprints. 

The event included entertainment, ranging from live music to clown shows, for the community and police to bond over. DLA Installation Support at Richmond’s police Sgt. Ernest Clayborn has attended several of the annual National Night Outs in chesterfield and expressed how it still feels amazing to see the community support and involvement in the event. 

“This is a great annual event,” said Clayborn. “I love being able to talk to the community and just have fun. Events like this breakdown barriers and build trust, and that’s important for everyone’s safety.”
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________ No. 97-50493 Summary Calendar

______________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOHN BONNER, Defendant-Appellant.

------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-96-CV-27 USDC No. EP-90-CR-86-11

------------------- September 23, 1998 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * AFFIRMED. See 5 th Cir. R. 47.6
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 1 to Business Loan Agreement (this "Amendment") is entered into as of February 16, 2001, between Tully's Coffee Corporation
("Borrower") and Bank of America, N.A. ("Lender") with reference to the following:

RECITALS

A.  Borrower
and Lender are parties to that certain Business Loan Agreement dated as of June 28, 2000 ("the Loan Agreement").

B.  The
parties hereto now desire to amend the Loan Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth below:

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.Definitions.Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in the Loan Agreement.

2.Amendments.The Loan Agreement shall be amended as follows:





3.Representations and Warranties.Borrower represents and warrants to Lender that: (i) after
giving effect to the waiver being issued by Lender to Borrower concurrently with this Amendment, no Event of Default under the Loan Agreement and no event which, with notice or lapse of time or both,
would become an Event of Default, has occurred and is continuing; (ii) after giving effect to the waiver being issued by Lender to Borrower concurrently with this Amendment, Borrower's
representations and warranties made under the Loan Agreement are true as of the date hereof; (iii) the making and performance by Borrower of this Amendment have been duly authorized by all
necessary corporate action; and (iv) no consent, approval, authorization, permit, or license is required in connection with the making or performance of this Amendment.

IN
WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

|BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. |  | TULLY'S COFFEE CORPORATION                               
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|By:                   |  | /s/NANCY NUERENBERGNancy Nuerenberg Senior Vice President

1

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24513]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION


Federal Acquisition Policy Division, FAR Secretariat; 
Cancellation of an Optional Form

AGENCY: General Services Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Acquisition Regulations eliminated the need for 
Optional Form 333, Procurement Integrity Certification For Procurement 
Officials removing the regulations that required its use. Therefore, OF 
333 is cancelled. This deleted requirement was effective January 1, 
1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Ralph DeStefano, (202) 501-1758.

DATES: Effective upon publication in the Federal Register September 16, 
1997.

    Dated: September 8, 1997.
Barbara M. Williams,
Deputy Standard and Optional Forms Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-24513 Filed 9-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-34-M
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. T. David BURNS, Relator, v. Honorable Roy H. AMIDON, as one of the Judges of the Criminal Court of Record of Polk County, Florida and Honorable Gordon MacCalla, as County Solicitor of Polk County, Florida, Respondents.

No. 41056.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 9, 1971.

Tobias Simon, Miami, for relator.

Gordon McCalla, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This is an original prohibition proceeding filed under Fla.Const. Article V, § 4(2), F.S.A., by the relator who seeks to prohibit his trial in the Criminal Court of Record of Polk County on charges filed against him under an information containing two counts of extortion under Fla.Stat. § 836.05, F.S.A., and one count of inciting to commit perjury, under Fla.Stat. § 837.-04, F.S.A.

The suggestion fails to satisfy the jurisdictional requirement of this Court as prescribed by Fla.Const. Article V, § 4(2), and it should have been originally filed with the Second District Court of Appeal.

Pursuant to our views expressed in State ex rel. Soodhalter v. Baker, Fla., 248 So.2d 468, opinion filed May 14, 1971, this suggestion for a writ of prohibition be and is hereby transferred to the Second District Court of Appeal for inquiry into this matter and for the granting of such relief as that court shall deem appropriate.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Dr. Jan Stahl,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Financial Officer
of the Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-Q of the Company  Health,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the  effectiveness  of the
disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the  registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably
likely to materially  affect,  the registrant's  internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Dated: February 21, 2006

/s/ Jan Stahl
----------------------------
Dr. Jan Stahl
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer
7 February 2017

US Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

1200 New Jersey Avenue

SE West Building Ground Floor

Room W12

- 140

Washington, DC 20550

Request for Extension

- Exemption Granted on 2 April 2015. Exemption No. 11276, Regulatory Docket

No. FAA2015

- 0543 (Aero

- Flite, Inc.

– Authorization to use Restricted category CL

- 415s and RJ

- 85s for Type Rating and PPE Observation check

- rides)

Reference (a ) 14 CFR 91.313 (a, b)

(b) 14 CFR 61.31 and 61.58 (c) 14 CFR 21.25 Flight Standards Board (FSB) Reports CL

- 415, 1998

Aero

- Flite Incorporated, holder of Part 137 C ertificate WMWG078J, requests our exemption from §91.313 (a

, b) to conduct pilot check flights as required by §61.31 and 61.58 in a Restricted category
aircraft be extended . Specifically, we request authorization to use our Bombardier CL

- 415, and BAe RJ85 aircraft to complete Type Rating check rides and Pilot Proficiency Examiner (PPE) annua l observation check rides required by §61.31 and 61.58. Attached to this request is the original request from Aero

- Flite, Inc. date d 20 February 2015. Also attached is the corrected copy of the exemption granted to Aero

- Flite, Inc. dated 2 April 2015 by th e
FAA . There are no changes to the request except the addition of four aircraft which I will list below along with the original aircraft in the exemption.

RJ

- 85s Serial number CL

- 415 Serial number

N839AC E2270 N389AC 2089

N354AC E2256 N392AC 2092

N 355AC E2293 Additional aircraft to add

N366AC E2288 N386AC 2093

N374AC E2266 N385AC 2095 Additional aircraft to add

N635AC E2330

N403AC E2253

Your attention to this matter is appreciated and necessary for Aero

- Flite to meet contractual obligations to the U.S. Forest Service, and to be available for emergency wildfire suppression. For clarification about this request, please contact the undersigned at 661

- 361

- 3043, or email ( mlynn@aerofliteinc.com ).Regards,

Mike Lynn Director of Fligh t Operations

Aero

- Flite, Inc.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATE OF THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
FNBH BANCORP, INC. Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350): I, Herbert W. Bursch, Chief Executive Officer of FNBH Bancorp, Inc., certify, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
that: (1) The annual report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2004, which this
statement accompanies, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and; (2) The information contained in this annual report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended
December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of FNBH Bancorp, Inc. FNBH BANCORP, INC.By:
    
    /s/ HERBERT W. BURSCHDate: March 16, 2005
    
    
    
    Herbert W. BurschIts:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
 The signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by FNBH Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Redgley WILLIAMS, Jr.

No. 60507.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1978.

Alton T. Moran, Director, Vincent Wilkins, Jr., Appellate Counsel, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie B. Brown, Dist. Atty., Ralph L. Roy, Marilyn Castle, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.

DENNIS, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of having incited and participated in a riot in which the death of. a person occurred, La.R.S. 14:329.-1-329.7, and was sentenced to twenty years at hard labor. Defendant appealed, relying upon two assignments of error for reversal of his conviction and sentence.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 2

In this assignment, defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a change of venue. The record of the hearing on the motion presents issues substantially similar to those we considered in *State v. Bell,*346 So.2d 1090 (La.1977). Here, as in *Bell,*the testimony taken as a whole does not support defendant’s contention that the trial judge abused his sound discretion in refusing the change of venue. *State v. Berry,*329 So.2d 728 (La.1976); *State*v. *Wilkerson,*326 So.2d 353 (La.1976); *State v. Stewart,*325 So.2d *563819 (La.1976). Therefore, we find that defendant’s first assignment of error lacks ' merit.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 4

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash on the basis of the unconstitutionally of La.R.S. 14:329.1-329.7. In State *v. Douglas,*278 So.2d 485 (La.1973), this Court up-; held the constitutionality of the statute now challenged by the defendant. *See also Douglas v. Pitcher,*319 F.Supp. 706 (E.D.La.1970). Accordingly, defendant’s fourth assignment of error is without merit.

Defendants conviction and sentence are affirmed.
**IN THE**  **SUPREME COURT OF**  **THE STATE OF**  **MONTANA No**  **. OP 21 -**  **0395** L.B., individually and on behalf of D.B., a minor, Plaint iff
- Appellant, v. United States of America; Bureau of Indian Affairs; Dana Bullco ming, agent of the Bureau of Indian Affairs sued in his individual capacit y, Defendants
- Appellees, The National Indigenous Wo me n’s Resource Center and Sovereign Bodies Institute (“NIWRC Amici”) have filed a motion for leave to participate and file an amicus curi ae brief. IT IS SO ORDERED that the NIWRC Amici’s request for leave to file an amicus brief is GRANTED. The NIWRC Amici are directed to file and serve the brief on or before October 15, 2021.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 24 2021

09/24/2021

Case Number: OP 21-0395