##### Table of Contents

---

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

---

FORM
10-K/A

---

(AMENDMENT NO. 1)

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
[________________] TO [________________]

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-28217

---

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its
charter)

---

| | DELAWARE(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization) |  | 59-3218138(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.) | 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------- | 

| | 3950 DOW ROAD,MELBOURNE, FLORIDA(Address of principal executive offices) |  | 32934(Zip Code) | 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------- | 

REGISTRANTS TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE:(321) 984-1990

NONE

COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $.001 PER SHARE(TITLE OF CLASS)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check x whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of shares held by non-affiliates as of June 28, 2002, the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $11,111,243 (based on a closing price on June 28, 2002 on
Nasdaq of $0.79 per share). As of March 10, 2003, 23,851,177 shares of the Registrants Common Stock were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE:NONE

---







---

##### Table of Contents

PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT

INTRODUCTORY NOTE - This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Registrants Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002 originally filed on April 1, 2003 (the Original Filing) is being filed for the purposes of giving effect to the restatement of the Companys financial statements as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2002 and 2001. See note 17 to the financial statements contained herein for a summary of the significant effects of the restatement. Accordingly, the registrant hereby amends the Original Filing as follows:



---

##### Table of Contents



TABLE OF CONTENTS

|ITEM     |  | DESCRIPTION                                                                           | PAGE
|-------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----
|         |  |                                                                                       |     
|         |  | PART I                                                                                |     
|         |  |                                                                                       |     
|Item 1.  |  | Business                                                                              | 4   
|Item 2.  |  | Properties                                                                            | 8   
|Item 3.  |  | Legal Proceedings.                                                                    | 8   
|Item 4.  |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                   | 9   
|         |  |                                                                                       |     
|         |  | PART II                                                                               |     
|         |  |                                                                                       |     
|Item 5.  |  | Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters                 | 9   
|Item 6.  |  | Selected Financial Data                                                               | 9   
|Item 7.  |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 10  
|Item 8.  |  | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data                                           | 23  
|Item 9.  |  | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure  | 24  
|         |  |                                                                                       |     
|         |  | PART III                                                                              |     
|         |  |                                                                                       |     
|Item 10. |  | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant                                    | 24  
|Item 11. |  | Executive Compensation                                                                | 26  
|Item 12. |  | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management                        | 28  
|Item 13. |  | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions                                        | 30  
|Item 14. |  | Controls and Procedures                                                               | 31  
|         |  |                                                                                       |     
|         |  | PART IV                                                                               |     
|         |  |                                                                                       |     
|Item 15. |  | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule, and Reports on Form8-K                        | 31  

2



---

##### Table of Contents

TRADEMARK AND TRADE NAMES

AirNet®, AdaptaCell®,
AirSite®, Backhaul Free and SuperCapacity are trademarks of AirNet Communications Corporation.

All other trademarks, service marks and/or trade names appearing
in this document are the property of their respective holders.

In this document, the words we, our, ours, and us refer only to
AirNet Communications Corporation and not any other person or entity.

3



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM
1.BUSINESS

OVERVIEW

We were incorporated in Delaware in 1994 as Overture
Systems, Inc. and changed our name to AirNet® Communications Corporation later that year.

We began marketing our GSM base stations in the beginning of 1996 and shipped our
first GSM base station in May 1997. Through December 31, 2002, our base stations were being used in twenty-two deployed systems. We currently sell and market our products in the U.S. through our direct sales force. Internationally, we sell our
products through our direct sales force, as well as through agents, resellers, and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).

From our inception in January 1994 through May 1997,
our operations consisted principally of start-up activity associated with the design, development, and marketing of our products. We did not generate significant revenues until 1998 and have generated $98.2 million in net revenues from our inception
through December 31, 2002. We have incurred substantial losses since commencing operations, and as of December 31, 2002, we had an accumulated deficit of $218.5 million. We have not achieved profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. As we
continue to build our customer and revenue base, we expect to continue to incur net losses at least through 2003. We will need to generate significantly higher revenues in order to support research and development, sales and marketing and general
and administrative expenses, and to achieve and maintain profitability. See Liquidity, Capital Resources and Going Concern in Item 7.

We provide base stations and other wireless
telecommunications infrastructure products designed to support the GSM, or Global System for Mobile Communications, system of mobile voice and data transmission. We market our products worldwide to operators of wireless networks and to certain
military and public safety organizations. A base station is a key component of a wireless network that receives and transmits voice and data signals over radio frequencies. We designed our base stations to be easier to deploy and upgrade and to have
lower operating costs than other existing base stations.

Our system features two innovative base station products: Our AdaptaCell® base station is a software-defined base
station, meaning it uses software to control the way it encodes or decodes wireless signals. Our AdaptaCell base station incorporates a proprietary radio architecture that is designed to enable operators to upgrade their wireless networks to offer
high-speed data and Internet services by changing software with few, if any, hardware modifications rather than deploying new base stations. Our AdaptaCell base station also incorporates a broadband architecture, meaning that it uses only one radio
to process a large number of radio channels. This broadband architecture also makes this base station an ideal platform to deliver integrated software algorithms that will permit the addition of an adaptive array antenna feature. Adaptive array
technology focuses radio signals on individual handset antennas instead of spreading the signals over the entire cell covered by one base station as well as blocks to strongest interference which significantly increases performance, capacity and
high speed data rates.

Our AirSite® Backhaul Free base station carries voice and data signals back to the wireline network without using a physical wired communications
link. Our AirSite Backhaul Free base station uses an operators existing radio frequencies as the media to provide the necessary connection to the wireline network. Unlike our competitors base stations, our AirSite Backhaul Free base
station does not require an expensive physical communications link, usually through a digital T-1/E-1 telephone line or microwave, to the wireline network. As a result, an operators fixed network operating costs may significantly decrease.

Like other wireless infrastructure suppliers, we have experienced the adverse effects of the global downturn in telecommunications infrastructure spending. We have historically
relied upon an integrated suite of infrastructure products for all our sales  a product line that was optimized to meet the needs of the initial-coverage and coverage-limited segments of the wireless infrastructure market. These are market
segments where we believe our products enjoy a competitive advantage. Unfortunately, the slowdown in infrastructure spending has adversely affected demand in all segments of the infrastructure market.

In response, we undertook a major restructuring starting in June of 2001 to better leverage our technology base and entrepreneurial culture to target new market opportunities for our GSM products. We have redirected our
activities to focus in four interrelated areas: our adaptive array technology for our AdaptaCell SuperCapacity base station; our traditional GSM infrastructure market; the growing market for secure, adaptable wireless infrastructure for
governmental and public safety applications; and the rapidly emerging GSM 850 market for migration of IS-136 networks to GSM and high-speed data.

The government and public
safety market includes radio communications needs for local, state, and federal government agencies, foreign governments and military communications. Our AdaptaCell software-defined radio (SDR) and AirSite products provide flexible and unique
communications platforms capable of supporting these applications.

AirNet continues to make progress in the development of its SuperCapacity AdaptaCell base station utilizing
adaptive array technology. We expect to deploy in the second half of 2003. This new base station is built on our current software-defined AdaptaCell base station platform using adaptive array technology. Adaptive array technology dramatically
increases the operators spectral efficiency  resulting in tremendous increases in network performance at a reduced cost  by focusing radio signals on individual handset antennas instead of spreading them over the entire cell and
canceling or blocking the strongest interference. This new base station is designed to benefit operators in the transition from current wireless standards to the new GPRS (providing high-speed wireless data in packet format) and Enhanced Data rates
for GSM Evolution (or EDGE, providing yet higher speed) standards. In December 2002 and January 2003, several customers, potential customers and wireless experts participated in drive testing a multi-cell GSM network utilizing the AirNet
SuperCapacity base station. Specifically, the test

4



---

##### Table of Contents

demonstrated multiple, adjacent adaptive array cell sites with multiple co-channel interferers, and demonstrated a frequency reuse scheme of N=1
incorporating high-speed hand-overs. N=1 frequency reuse is an important feature for network operators in that it allows simultaneous multiple users on the same timeslot, on the same frequency, in adjacent cells, previously not possible in GSM
networks. This feature enables previously unattainable capacity improvements and dramatically reduces the need to add cell sites in order to meet increasing subscriber counts and higher speed data requirements, such as EDGE . We plan to market the
N=1 frequency reuse feature by targeting GSM carriers who are faced with limited spectrum in many markets, need to increase capacity, and/or are introducing EDGE into their networks. There are risks associated with new product introductions and some
of these risks are outlined in the risk factors set forth in Item 7 below and elsewhere in this document.

The IS-136 technology is the basis of the TDMA cellular and Personal
Communications Services (PCS) air interfaces. The IS-136 systems allow telecommunications companies to offer advanced personal wireless communications features and services to subscribers while maintaining backward compatibility for their existing
analog (AMPS) system customer bases. Service operators that provide IS-136 air interface services are compelled to transition their networks to 2.5 or 3G services such as GPRS , EDGE and WideBand CDMA in order to provide high-speed data services and
to remain compatible with Cingular and ATT Wireless, which have announced plans to migrate their IS-136 networks to GSM/GPRS/EDGE. In order to continue to share in roaming revenues offered by users of these nationwide networks, other IS-136
operators must follow suit. We offer customers a cost effective method to migrate their IS-136 networks leveraging the value proposition of the AdaptaCell software defined base station and AirSite base stations to provide an alternate GSM 850
network that shares the spectrum of existing IS-136 networks.

Our portfolio of broadband SDR technology and our entrepreneurial tradition lend themselves to exploiting numerous
new opportunities in the wireless arena. We believe these new opportunities  driven by recent developments both inside and outside the company  offer a tremendous potential for immediate growth and success. SDR technology allows us to
readily reprogram our wireless infrastructure products to address new markets and new opportunities in a cost effective manner. The development and acceptance of SDR technology in the marketplace has created new opportunities for us
outside our core industry. Due to our significant portfolio of basic SDR intellectual property, it is now possible for us to explore licensing our technology in a variety of applications to third parties. Previously, the only potential licensees for
our technology were our wireless infrastructure competitors.

We continue to develop and exploit leading edge technology and as of December 31, 2002, we had 50 domestic patents
granted, and 18 patent applications pending. We received the 1998 GSM World Award for Best Technical Innovation from the GSM Association, an international body with members from over 150 countries, in recognition of our innovative
infrastructure.

On October 23, 2002 we received certification under the ISO 9001:2000 standard. ISO 9001:2000 is the globally recognized standard for QMS aimed at consistently
producing and delivering the highest quality products and services necessary to achieve complete customer satisfaction.

PRODUCTS

Our base station subsystem products currently support the GSM system for wireless voice and data communications services. We chose to develop products based on this standard both because it is the leading accepted
standard in the world and because the interfaces, or connections, between the various pieces that make up the GSM base station subsystem are well defined and publicly documented. One of these interfaces, the connection between the mobile switching
center (MSC) and the base station controller, and ultimately the base stations that compose the base station subsystem, is referred to as the A-interface. This A-interface allows wireless operators to connect our base station subsystem equipment to
an existing operators mobile switching center. It is this standard interface that makes any existing GSM operator a potential customer for our base station subsystem equipment. We are currently marketing the base station subsystem in four
standard configurations, the GSM-850, GSM-900, GSM-1800 and GSM-1900, operating at 850 MHz, 900 MHz, 1800 MHz and 1900 MHz respectively. Our products have been deployed with customers using the following MSC providers: Nortel, Alcatel, Lucent,
Nokia, Siemens, Tecore, and Telos.

Our base station subsystem features two unique base station products: the AdaptaCell broadband, software-defined base station and the AirSite
Backhaul Free base station. We also offer a Base Station Controller, a Transcoder Rate Adaption Unit, an Operations and Maintenance Center (radio), Serving GPRS Support Node (SGSN), and Gateway GPRS Support Node (GGSN).

AdaptaCell Base Station: The AdaptaCell wireless base station supports up to 12 GSM radio frequency carriers (96 total channels including 92 voice/data channels and four control channels) for up to 4
pairs of antennas (sectors). The AdaptaCell base station differs from our competitors base stations in that its operation is defined by software, not hardware. This means that as subscribers demand new services from operators, specifically new
high-speed data and Internet services, it will be possible to upgrade the AdaptaCell base station to support those services via a change of software and few, if any, hardware modifications. Operators using our competitors equipment may have to
install new equipment and potentially a completely new base station for each new wireless standard they adopt.

AdaptaCell SuperCapacity Base Station: We previously announced
plans to introduce the AdaptaCell SuperCapacity base station which allows up to 12/12/12 (288 total channels) in only a 5MHz channel spectrum. This new base station is built on our current
software-defined AdaptaCell base station platform using adaptive array technology. Adaptive array technology dramatically increases the operators spectral efficiency  resulting in tremendous increases in network performance  by
focusing radio signals on individual handset antennas instead of spreading them over the entire cell. The new base station is designed to benefit operators in the transition from current wireless standards to the new GPRS (General Packet Radio
Service) standard, providing high-speed wireless data in packet format and the EDGE Enhanced Data rates for GSM Evolution, (also known as Enhanced GPRS or EGPRS) standard, providing yet higher speed. When our development work is completed, the new
base station will provide increased capacity and higher data rates without the need to deploy additional base stations, while avoiding decreases in cell coverage area.

5



---

##### Table of Contents

AirSite Backhaul Free Base Station: The AirSite Backhaul Free base station is a compact wireless base station that includes its own wireless backhaul system.
By contrast, other existing base stations must be connected to the rest of the system using expensive physical communications links, usually digital T-1/E-1 telephone lines or microwave. The AirSite Backhaul Free base station is a full featured GSM
base station, meaning it has a unique cell ID for billing and 911 emergency identification purposes, offers the same geographic coverage as other existing base stations, and has configuration, fault, and error detection integrated into
the Operations and Maintenance Center (radio). The AirSite Backhaul Free base station operates by receiving a subscribers wireless telephone signal and transmitting it to the AdaptaCell base station. The AdaptaCell base station then sends the
signal over a T-1/E-1 line or microwave to the base station controller and on to the mobile switching center. In reverse, digitized voice signals come from the mobile switching center to the base station controller and then to the serving AdaptaCell
base station, which then transmits the signal to the AirSite Backhaul Free base station. The AirSite Backhaul Free base station then transmits the signal to the subscriber.

Base
Station Controller: Our base station controller (BSC) coordinates the activities of the AdaptaCell base stations physically attached to it and all the AirSite Backhaul Free base stations served by those AdaptaCell base stations. Among other things,
the BSC monitors the operational status of each of its attached base stations and orchestrates handoffs between base stations.

To support packet data services (i.e. GPRS and
EGPRS) the BSC supports an optional packet control unit (PCU). The PCU manages distribution of packet data to and from GPRS-enabled mobile units via the base stations attached to the base station controller and GPRS network components, namely the
SGSN (Serving GPRS Support Node) and GGSN (Gateway GPRS Support Node).

Transcoder Rate Adaption Unit: In most telecommunications systems, digitized voice requires 64 Kbps of
bandwidth to accurately convey human speech. Our transcoder rate adaptation unit compresses a standard 64 Kbps voice stream to a GSM-standardized 16 Kbps. This means that the digital T-1/E-1 telephone line or microwave used to connect the base
station controller to the mobile switching center can carry four times as many voice conversations as it normally would. This makes it less expensive to attach a base station subsystem to its associated mobile switching center. Additionally, AirNet
is developing software to support adaptive multirate (AMR) speech coding. This feature increases voice capacity of GSM networks while maintaining the current high levels of voice quality.

Operations and Maintenance Center (Radio): The operations and maintenance center-radio provides the network management facility for one or more of our base station subsystems. Our operations and maintenance center
(radio) provides a comprehensive graphical user interface for maintenance personnel.

In addition to the previously described products, AirNet also provides for sale other GSM
network components manufactured by others in order to provide complete voice and data systems to our customers. These include the MSC, GGSN and SGSN.

Mobile Switching Center: The
MSC interfaces to one or more base station controllers via the A-interface, previously mentioned. This MSC provides mobility management and switching to connect a caller on a mobile unit to a caller on another mobile unit or a caller on the wireline
public switching telephone network (PSTN). The MSC supports other functions such authentication of mobile subscribers to prevent fraud. Additionally, the MSC supports features familiar to users of telephone systems such as call forwarding, call
waiting, call conferencing, etc. The MSC may also interface to voice mail systems, short message service centers (SMSC), billing systems as well as other mobile switching centers.

Serving GPRS Support Node: The SGSN provides a mobility management function that tracks a GPRS mobile from one base station to another in order to route data packets to and from the mobile subscriber. The SGSN interfaces to the PCU in the
base station controller and to the GGSN. Additionally, the SGSN supports other functions such as authentication of GPRS mobile subscribers as well as provides information on mobile subscriber usage for billing purposes.

Gateway GPRS Support Node: The GGSN is the gateway between the GPRS network and an external data network such as the Internet, supporting routing of data packets between the GPRS network and the
external packet data network. The GGSN and SGSN may be combined into one physical unit, the GPRS Support Node (GSN).

CUSTOMERS

Each of three customers, TECORE Wireless Systems, Telsom Mobile, and MBO Cross accounted for approximately 5% or more of our revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. Together these customers accounted for
approximately 75% of our revenues for the period ended December 31, 2002. See Note 13 of Notes to Financial Statements for financial information regarding our customers.

SALES AND MARKETING

We sell and market our products in the U.S. primarily through our direct sales force. Our international sales and marketing efforts are conducted
through a network of original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, agents, resellers and our direct sales force. We currently have a staff of five in sales and sales support.

Our
sales strategy depends on a delayed introduction of 3G technologies and the continued evolution of GSM/GPRS/EDGE. Sales in the North American PCS market may be impeded due to roaming considerations.

We have established a marketing communications organization that is responsible for the branding and marketing of our products and services and for distinguishing the AirSite Backhaul Free base station and AdaptaCell
base station as branded product offerings. The marketing organization is responsible for all new product launches to ensure both internal execution and marketplace acceptance.

6



---

##### Table of Contents

RESEARCH AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

We spent $12,543,815 in 2002, $25,563,216 in
2001 and $29,634,807 in 2000 on research and product development. As of December 31, 2002, 57 of our 125 employees were engaged in research and product development, including hardware and software engineering. We do not expect to hire additional
employees to engage in research and product development during 2003 unless such research and development is funded by strategic partners, customers or new investments. As of February 2003 we had 110 employees with 57 engaged in research and
development.

Our current product development plans focus on the adaptive array technology for our AdaptaCell SuperCapacity base station, EDGE, product cost reductions and
features for major operators by taking advantage of the evolution of digital signal processors and other digital components to reduce the cost of our base stations.

Ultimately,
we expect to develop one or more 3G upgrade packages. We may not be able to introduce these or any other products as scheduled. In addition, market conditions may not necessitate developing upgrade packages to support one or more of these emerging
3G high-speed data standards.

Our product development strategy has been to concentrate our engineering resources on our core technology while making maximum use of third-party
vendors and products for everything else. As a result, our engineering resources are primarily focused on broadband, software-defined base station technology and backhaul free base stations.

MANUFACTURING AND BACKLOG

We currently use a limited number of third-party contractors to manufacture most of our primary components and
subassemblies for our products. As a result, our in-house customer fulfillment operations consist primarily of quality control, final assembly, and product integration and testing. Circuit boards, electronic and mechanical parts, and other component
assemblies are purchased from OEMs and other selected vendors. An in-house staff sets standards and monitors the quality control of our contract manufacturers.

Our product
backlog was approximately $4.0 million at December 31, 2002 as compared to $5.7 million at December 31, 2001. We typically include a contract in backlog when it is signed by the customer and by us and a deposit is received from the customer.

The amount of our backlog is subject to fluctuation based on the timing of the receipt and completion of orders. The amount generally consists of orders shippable within one
year and deferred revenue from products that have been shipped to customers but have not yet satisfied all significant terms and conditions of the customer contract as well as revenue from contracts with vendor financing arrangements which extend
beyond one year. Such conditions include completion of installation and customer acceptance of product technical performance. See Note 1 of Notes to Financial Statements for a description of our revenue recognition policy.

Our backlog at any particular date is not necessarily indicative of future revenues.

COMPETITION

The wireless telecommunications infrastructure market is highly competitive. The market for our products is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry wireless standards and
frequent new product introductions and enhancements. Failure to keep pace with these changes could seriously harm our competitive position and prospects for growth. Our ability to compete depends on many factors including product and standard
flexibility, price, operating cost and reliability.

Current and potential competitors consist primarily of major domestic and international companies, most of which have longer
operating histories; larger installed customer bases; higher volumes; substantially greater name recognition; and greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution resources. Competing base station vendors can be divided
into two groups: existing large equipment manufacturers who supply a complete range of wireless base station systems to wireless service operators and smaller companies that typically market components of wireless systems to system suppliers or
directly to operators. Our current competitors include Alcatel S.A., LM Ericsson Telephone Company, Lucent Technologies Inc., Motorola, Inc., NEC Corporation, Nokia Corporation, Nortel Networks Corporation and Siemens AG. We also face actual and
potential competition not only from these established companies but from start-up and smaller companies that develop and market new wireless telecommunications products and services.

PROPRIETARY RIGHTS

We consider our technologies proprietary and seek to protect our intellectual property rights. As of December 31, 2002,
we had 50 domestic patents granted, and 18 domestic patent applications pending. In addition, we are seeking patent protection for our inventions in foreign countries. One of the allowed domestic patents was based upon proprietary rights originally
obtained from Harris Corporation, one of our stockholders, and is subject to a non-exclusive cross license to a third party. We also obtained from Harris Corporation a royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive right and license to use six other patents
in the manufacture and sale of products covered by these patents. Our patents cover the basic architecture of the system, sub-components, and frequency reuse planning schemes.

Simultaneously with Motorolas equity investment in January 1995, we signed an agreement granting Motorola the right to obtain a non-exclusive, royalty-free license under any two of our patents. With respect to possible infringement of
our respective digital base station patents, each of us agreed not to enjoin the other and to attempt dispute resolution, including negotiation of nonexclusive license agreements in good faith, before resorting to litigation.

7



---

##### Table of Contents

While we believe that our patents will render it more difficult for competitors to develop and market similar products, our patents may be invalidated,
circumvented, or challenged. Our patent rights may fail to provide us with competitive advantages. Any pending or future patent applications, whether or not being currently challenged by applicable governmental patent examiners, may not be issued
with the scope we seek.

We also rely upon copyright and trade secret laws. Source code for our own proprietary software is protected as an unpublished copyrighted work and as a
trade secret.

Notwithstanding our efforts to protect our rights, it may be possible for a third party to copy or to obtain and use our intellectual property without our
authorization. We may have to pursue litigation in the future to enforce our proprietary rights or to defend against claims of infringement and such litigation could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and could seriously harm our
business, operating results, and financial condition. We are not engaged in any legal proceedings concerning matters of patent infringement or enforcement; however, we are presently involved in a few minor legal proceedings involving rights in our
AirNet trademark. In addition, others may develop technologies superior to our technology, duplicate our technology, or design around our patents.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

Our products must conform to a variety of requirements and protocols. In order for our products to be used in certain jurisdictions, regulatory approval may be necessary.
The delays inherent in this regulatory approval process may cause the rescheduling, postponement or cancellation of the installation of telecommunications systems by our customers, which, in turn, may significantly reduce sales of products to such
customers. The failure to comply with current or future regulations or changes in the interpretation of existing regulations in a particular country could result in the suspension or cessation of sales in that country, restrictions on our
development efforts and those of our customers, render current products obsolete, or increase the opportunity for additional competition. Such regulations or such changes in interpretation could require us to modify our products and incur
substantial costs to comply with such regulations and changes. Products to support new services can be marketed only if permitted by frequency allocations and regulations. In most cases, we only plan to qualify our products in a foreign country once
we have a purchase order from a customer located there, and this practice may deter customers or contribute to delays in receiving or filling orders.

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 2002, we had 125 employees. Of these individuals, 57 were in research and product development. We also had 7 independent contractors as of the same date.
As of February 2003 we had 110 employees and six contractors. Of these 110 employees, 57 were employed in research and product development.

Most of our employees did not receive
any merit increases in 2002 and none are expected in 2003. In January 2003 we postponed the payment of bonuses to employees and suspended the company matching contributions to the 401(K) plan. These items may create an impediment to the retention of
our key employees.

None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and we believe that our relations with our employees are good. However, we cannot guarantee retention
of key employees due to the issues noted above.

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

Our headquarters consist of approximately 41,000 square feet of space leased through December 31, 2004, located at 3950 Dow Road in
Melbourne, Florida. The space also houses the primary manufacturing and product engineering operation. Additional space of approximately 20,000 square feet at the Trio Complex in Melbourne, Florida, is leased through December 31, 2003 for final
assembly and testing. The lease for the Dow Road facility gives us the right to terminate any time after June 2002 with a six-month notice. We believe that these facilities will be adequate to meet our requirements for the foreseeable future and
that suitable additional or substitute space will be available if needed.

ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On August 14, 2001, our vendor MC Test Service, Inc. d/b/a MC Assembly and Test filed an action against us in the Circuit Court for
the 18th Judicial Circuit in Brevard County, Florida alleging, among other things, breach of contract and seeking damages in the amount of $1,300,000. We filed an answer raising affirmative defenses and a counterclaim seeking damages from MC
Assembly and Test in excess of $5,000,000. We believe MC Assembly and Test shipped defective products, which resulted in lost business opportunities and hampered collection of our accounts receivable. In June 2002, the Company and MC Assembly and
Test entered into a settlement agreement. The terms of the settlement agreement call for performance by both parties, including the purchase of products and the satisfaction of accounts payable during the third quarter of 2002. The terms of the
agreement were met during the third quarter of 2002 and the matter is considered closed by both parties. The effect of the settlement agreement is included as a gain in operating expense as reported in the accompanying financial statements for the
period ended December 31, 2002.

The Company, the members of the underwriting syndicate involved in our initial public offering and two of our former officers have been named as
defendants in a class action lawsuit filed on November 16, 2001 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The action, number 21 MC 92 (SAS), alleges that the defendants violated federal securities laws and seeks
unspecified monetary damages and certification of a plaintiff class consisting of all persons and entities who purchased, converted, exchanged or otherwise acquired shares of our common stock between December 6, 1999 and December 6, 2000, inclusive.
Specifically, the complaint charges the defendants with violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In substance, the allegations are that the underwriters of our initial
public offering charged commissions in excess of those disclosed in the initial public offering materials and that these actions were not properly disclosed. We do not know whether the claims of misconduct by the underwriters have merit

8



---

##### Table of Contents

but at this time we believe the claims against us are without merit and intend to defend this matter when appropriate. Under the terms of our Underwriting
Agreement, we have claims against the underwriters of the initial public offering for indemnification and reimbursement of all of the costs and any damages incurred in connection with this lawsuit and we intend to pursue those claims vigorously. On
July 15, 2002 the Issuers Committee filed a Motion to Dismiss on behalf of all issuers and individual defendants. In February 2003, the Motion to Dismiss was granted in part (with respect to AirNet) and denied in part (with respect to all
issuer defendants). Discovery in this litigation is commencing while settlement talks between the plaintiffs and the issuers continue. The claims against our two former officers named in the class action lawsuit have been dismissed without
prejudice. The Company is not able to predict the impact, if any, the ultimate resolution of this lawsuit may have on its financial position or future results of operations.

In
addition to the items listed above we are also involved in various claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business. With respect to these matters, we believe that we have adequate legal defenses such that the ultimate
outcome will not have a material adverse effect on our future financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 4.SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report, no matter was submitted to a
vote of security holders.

PART II

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

See Status of our Common Stock listing on Nasdaq National Market in Item 7.

Our common stock has been listed on the NASDAQ
National Market System under the symbol ANCC since December 7, 1999. There is no established trading market for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and related warrants to purchase our common stock that we issued and sold in May 2001, nor is
there a trading market for outstanding warrants we issued and sold in June and August 1999. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for our common stock as reported by NASDAQ for the periods indicated:



|                             |  | LOW |      | HIGH |  
|---------------------------- |  | --- | ---- | ---- | -
|                             |  |     |      |      |  
|YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 |  |     |      |      |  
|First Quarter                |  | $   | 0.42 |      | $
|Second Quarter               |  | $   | 0.71 |      | $
|Third Quarter                |  | $   | 0.55 |      | $
|Fourth Quarter               |  | $   | 0.47 |      | $
|YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 |  |     |      |      |  
|First Quarter                |  | $   | 2.00 |      | $
|Second Quarter               |  | $   | 1.20 |      | $
|Third Quarter                |  | $   | 0.07 |      | $
|Fourth Quarter               |  | $   | 0.12 |      | $

We had 396 stockholders of record as of February 21, 2003. This
number does not include the number of persons whose stock is in nominee or in street name accounts through brokers.

We have not paid dividends and do not anticipate
paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We have a retained earnings deficit, and we expect to retain future earnings for use in our businesses. See Note 7 and 17 to the Financial Statements for a complete explanation of this security.

ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

You should read the
following selected financial information in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes and with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this
report.



|                                            |                                                    | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |       
|------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ------
|                                            |                                                    |                          |       
|                                            |                                                    | 1998                     |       
|                                            |                                                    |                          |       
|                                            |                                                    |                          |       
|STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:               |                                                    |                          |       
|Net revenues                                |                                                    | $                        | 4,462 
|Cost of revenues                            |                                                    | 2,679                    |       
|Write down of obsolete and excess inventory |                                                    | 188                      |       
|                                            |                                                    |                          |       
|                                            |                                                    |                          |       
|Gross profit (loss)                         |                                                    | 1,595                    |       
|                                            |                                                    |                          |       
|Operating expenses (gains)                  |                                                    |                          |       
|                                            | Research and development                           |                          | 13,538
|                                            | Sales and marketing                                |                          | 2,794 
|                                            | General and administrative                         |                          | 4,121 
|                                            | Gain on vendor settlements                         |                          |       
|                                            | Loss (gain) on disposal or write-down of equipment |                          |       
|                                            |                                                    |                          |       

9



---

##### Table of Contents



|Total operating expenses                                                   |  | 20,448  |         | 23,700    |   | 52,824     |   | 47,222     |         | 20,311     |     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------- | ------- | --------- | - | ---------- | - | ---------- | ------- | ---------- | ----
|                                                                           |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|                                                                           |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|Loss from operations                                                       |  | (18,853 | )       | (17,188   | ) | (49,696    | ) | (58,154    | )       | (14,845    | )   
|Other income (expense), net                                                |  | 77      |         | 609       |   | 4,672      |   | 542        |         | 397        |     
|                                                                           |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|                                                                           |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|Net loss                                                                   |  | (18,776 | )       | (16,579   | ) | (45,024    | ) | (57,612    | )       | (14,448    | )   
|Accretion of discount - Series B                                           |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|Preferred                                                                  |  |        |         |          |   |           |   | (1,036     | )       | (7,495     | )(1)
|Accretion of cumulative preferred dividends.                               |  | (5,616  | )       | (18,647   | ) |           |   | (1,500     | )       | (2,400     | )   
|                                                                           |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|                                                                           |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|Net loss attributable to common stockholders                               |  | $       | (24,392 | )         | $ | (35,226    | ) | $          | (45,024 | )          | $   
|                                                                           |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|                                                                           |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders - basic and
diluted |  | $       | (81.88  | )         | $ | (18.31     | ) | $          | (1.91   | )          | $   
|                                                                           |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|                                                                           |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|Shares used in calculating basic and diluted loss per common share.        |  | 297,895 |         | 1,923,360 |   | 23,579,467 |   | 23,783,637 |         | 23,822,913 |     
|                                                                           |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|                                                                           |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|CASH FLOW DATA:                                                            |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|Net cash used in operating activities                                      |  | $       | (17,791 | )         | $ | (15,111    | ) | $          | (62,601 | )          | $   
|                                                                           |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|Net cash used in investing activities                                      |  | (885    | )       | (1,472    | ) | (8,700     | ) | (3,149     | )       | (38        | )   
|                                                                           |  |         |         |           |   |            |   |            |         |            |     
|Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities                        |  | 14,879  |         | 109,425   |   | (254       | ) | 27,160     |         | (321       | )   



|                           |  |        |        |         |   |         |  |             |        |             |    
|-------------------------- |  | ------ | ------ | ------- | - | ------- |  | ----------- | ------ | ----------- | ---
|                           |  | 1998   |        | 1999    |   | 2000    |  | 2001        |        | 2002        |    
|                           |  |        |        |         |   |         |  |             |        |             |    
|                           |  |        |        |         |   |         |  | as restated |        | as restated |    
|BALANCE SHEET DATA:        |  |        |        |         |   |         |  |             |        |             |    
|Cash and cash equivalents  |  | $      | 7,580  |         | $ | 100,422 |  | $           | 28,867 |             | $  
|Working capital            |  | 11,252 |        | 104,475 |   | 49,118  |  | 23,431      |        | 12,263      |    
|Total assets               |  | 21,921 |        | 131,013 |   | 92,134  |  | 49,875      |        | 30,830      |    
|Long-term obligations      |  | 75     |        | 201     |   | 216     |  | 2,070       | (1)    | 837         | (1)
|Total stockholders equity |  |        | 14,463 |         |   | 108,263 |  |             | 64,223 |             |    

(1) As restated, see Note 17 of the financial statements

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

As discussed in Note 17 to the financial statements included in Item 8, the Company has restated its financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. The following
managment discussion and analysis takes into account the effects of the restatement and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto presented elsewhere in this Form 10-K/A.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

We provide base stations and
other wireless telecommunications infrastructure products designed to support the GSM system of mobile voice and data transmission. We have substantial intellectual experience in the wireless industry and products and market our products worldwide
to operators of wireless networks. A base station is a key component of a wireless network and is used to receive and transmit voice and data signals over radio frequencies. Our products include the AdaptaCell base station, a software-defined base
station, meaning it uses software to control the way it encodes and decodes voice and data wireless signals, and the AirSite Backhaul Free base station, which carries voice and data signals back to the wireline network without using a physical
communications link. These products are continually evolving.

From our inception in January 1994 through May 1997, our operations consisted principally of start-up activity
associated with the design, development, and marketing of our products. We did not generate significant revenues until 1998 and have generated only $98.2 million in net revenues from our inception through December 31, 2002. We have incurred
substantial losses since commencing operations, and as of December 31, 2002, we had an accumulated deficit of $218.5 million. We have not achieved profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. As we continue to build our customer and revenue base we
expect to continue to incur net losses at least through 2003. We will need to generate significantly higher revenues in order to support research and development, sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses, and to achieve and
maintain profitability. See Liquidity, Capital Resources, and Going Concern below.

We began marketing our GSM base stations in the beginning of 1996 and shipped our first GSM
base station in May 1997. Through December 31, 2002, our base stations were being used in twenty-two deployed systems. We currently sell and market our products in the U.S. through our direct sales force. Internationally, we sell our products
through our direct sales force, as well as through agents and OEMs. Our revenues are derived from sales of a product line based on the GSM standard. We generate a substantial portion of our revenues from a limited number of customers, with
three customers accounting for 75% of our net revenues during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000, 2001, and 2002, 11.8%, 19.2%, and 29.1%, respectively, of our revenues were from international
deployments, respectively. We expect our percentage of international revenues to increase as a result of our expansion of international sales and distribution activities.

10



---

##### Table of Contents

During 2001, we experienced a significant period of transition. In mid-2001, management undertook a strategic review of the business and established the
following objectives for the future: simplify the business, reduce the cost structure and move towards the path to long-term sustainable profitability. In connection with these objectives, we took action during the second and third quarters to
reduce costs and discretionary expenditures, negotiated settlements with vendors on existing accounts payable balances, undertook efforts to better leverage our technology base and entrepreneurial culture to target new market opportunities, and
redirected our activities to focus in four interrelated areas: the growing market for secure, adaptable wireless infrastructure for governmental and public safety applications; our adaptive array technology for our AdaptaCell SuperCapacity base
station; the rapidly emerging GSM 850 market for migration of IS-136 networks to GSM and high-speed data; and our traditional GSM infrastructure market. While market demand continues to be uncertain, we believe our strategy and new direction offer
the most stable and attractive opportunities for us. These four areas are interrelated and address the same basic market, that is, the wireless infrastructure market.

We have
had and expect to continue to experience, significant fluctuations in our quarterly revenues as a result of our long and variable sales cycle. Historically, our sales cycle, which is the period from the time a sales lead is generated until the
recognition of revenue, has ranged up to eighteen months in time. The length and variability of our sales cycle is influenced by a number of factors beyond our control, including our customers build out and deployment schedules; our
customers access to product purchase financing; our customers degree of familiarity with our products; the need for functional demonstrations and field trials; the manufacturing lead time for our products; delays in final acceptance of
products following shipments; regulatory developments; and our revenue recognition policies. The effect of our potentially long sales cycle on our results is compounded by our current dependence on a small number of customers.

In general, our gross margins will be affected by the following factors:

Demand for our products and services;

New product introductions, both by us and our competitors;

Changes in our
pricing policies and those of our competitors;

The mix of base stations and other products sold;

The mix of sales channels through which our products are sold;

Engineering cost reduction successes;

Access to the best
vendors from a cost and technology viewpoint;

The mix of domestic and international sales; and

The volume pricing we are able to obtain from contract manufacturers and third party vendors.

We currently obtain all of our primary components and subassemblies for our products from a limited number of independent contract manufacturers and purchase circuit boards, electronic and
mechanical parts and other component assemblies from a limited number of OEMs and other selected vendors. Accordingly, a significant portion of our cost of revenues consists of payments to these suppliers. The remainder of our cost of revenues is
related to our in-house manufacturing operations, which consist primarily of quality control, procurement and material management, final assembly, testing, and product integration.

Research and development expenses consist primarily of expenses incurred in the design, development and support of our proprietary technology. We expect research and development expenses to stabilize as we complete the development of our core
technology. Research and development associated with future products will depend on customer requirements. We may, however, incur costs in connection with the development of the software needed to upgrade our base stations to support emerging
wireless high-speed data transmission standards. The cost incurred for the software development performed by third parties through development agreements are carried on the balance sheet as an intangible asset until the product is deployed. At that
time the cost will be amortized over the life of the product.

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions, consulting fees, trade show expenses,
advertising, marketing expenses and general support costs. We intend to maintain expenditures for selling and marketing in order to support distribution channels, strategic relationships, sales and marketing personnel, a 24x7 customer service
center, RF services, field service support, and marketing programs.

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of expenses for finance, office operations,
administrative and general management activities, including legal, accounting, human resources, and other professional fees and reserves for receivables and bad debts.

On May
31, 2002 we were notified by the SEC that it had performed what we believe was a routine review of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and requested clarification or explanation on some items. On June 28, 2002, we
provided the requested clarification and explanation without amending or restating previous filings. There have been no further questions raised by the SEC. Management does not anticipate any further questions on this review.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

See Item 13 regarding a description of related party transactions during 2002.

11



---

##### Table of Contents

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001

Net
revenues: Net revenues increased $8.5 million or 58.6% from $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 to $23.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This increase in revenues was a result of two major orders received for
installations ultimately in the overseas market.

Gross Profit: Gross profit increased $16.4 million from a loss of $10.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 to $5.5
million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The gross profit margin was (75.2%) for 2001 and 23.9% for 2002. The increase in the gross profit margin was primarily attributable to a substantial decrease in inventory related charges, including
write-downs for certain obsolete and excess inventory of $8.8 million during 2001 and our ability to leverage existing inventory to support the increase in revenue without significant procurement of new material. In addition, warranty expense
decreased by $2.2 million in the period ended December 31, 2002 versus the year ended December 31, 2001. We expect our gross margin percentage to decline from our year ended December 31, 2002 level during the first six months of 2003 or until our
cost reduction program is completed and products begin to ship. In addition, the slow-moving inventory, not previously written off, as of December 31, 2002 was $2.1 million, which may be written down in the future if usage remains low resulting in
decreased gross profit. Based upon our estimated view that the telecommunications market will experience a turnaround in the future, our improved product mix, a reduction of one-time charges, successful implementation of cost reductions, and the
refocus of our efforts in the new directions discussed previously, we expect our gross margin percentage to improve in the future. However, future market conditions and economic conditions could affect the achievement of this objective.

Research and development: Research and development expenses decreased $13.1 million or 50.8% from $25.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 to $12.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2002. This decrease was due to previously announced actions taken in the second and third quarters of 2001 to reduce operating expenses which included actions to focus development in the areas with the greatest near-term potential. The
$13.1 million dollar decrease included a $6.3 million reduction in labor and benefit costs, a $3.6 million reduction in consulting and subcontractor expenses, a $1.0 million reduction in expensed R&D equipment, a $0.5 million reduction in travel
and recruiting expenses, and a $0.4 million reduction in leased equipment. The research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2002 included an accrual of approximately $0.7 million for bonuses accrued under a Board approved
bonuses program that were scheduled to be paid in January 2003. We are deferring the payment of these bonuses until such time as payment is approved by the two entities considering a funding agreement with the Company. See Liquidity, Capital
Resource and Going Concerns below.

Sales and marketing: Sales and marketing expenses decreased $6.5 million or 54.6% from $11.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 to
$5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. This decrease was due to previously announced actions taken in the second and third quarters of 2001 to reduce operating expenses. The $6.5 million reduction included a $2.4 million reduction in
labor and benefit costs, a $1.0 million reduction in consulting and subcontractor expenses, a $1.2 million reduction in travel expenses and $0.4 million reduction in trade show expenses. The sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December
31, 2002 included an accrual of approximately $0.3 million for bonuses accrued under a Board approved bonuses program that were scheduled to be paid in January 2003. We are deferring the payment of these bonuses until such time as payment is
approved by the two entities considering a funding agreement with the Company. See Liquidity, Capital Resource and Going Concerns below.

General and administrative: General and
administrative expenses decreased $8.6 million or 74.1% from $11.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 to $3.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The $8.6 million reduction in expenses was primarily attributable to the recovery
of receivables previously accounted for in the provision for doubtful accounts of $2.4 million. In addition, there was a reduction in the provision for doubtful accounts of $5.0 million, and a $1.0 million reduction in outside legal services.
Savings initiatives were also accomplished through a reduction in the aggregate workforce of the Company, consolidation of facilities, and an adjustment in certain business functions, streamlining the organization. The general and administrative
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2002 included an accrual of approximately $0.2 million for bonuses accrued under a Board approved bonuses program that were scheduled to be paid in January 2003. We are deferring the payment of these bonuses
until such time as payment is approved by the two entities considering a funding agreement with the Company. See Liquidity, Capital Resource and Going Concerns below..

Gain on
vendor settlements: The Company recorded a gain on vendor settlements of $703,618 during 2002 as compared to $1,921,605 during 2001. The current year gain was a result of the finalization of a Company program to enter into agreements with certain
vendors to settle outstanding payables in exchange for releasing the Company from future obligations.

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000

Net revenues: Net revenues decreased $19.8 million or 57.7% from $34.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 to $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2001.
This decrease in revenues was a result of the deterioration in global telecommunications market conditions and a reduction in capital spending by service providers, leading to a reduction in orders received from active customers and difficulties in
obtaining orders from potential new customers.

Gross Profit: Gross profit decreased $14.0 million or 451.6% from $3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 to a loss of
$10.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. The gross profit margin was 9.0% for 2000 and (75%) for 2001. The decrease in the gross profit margin was primarily attributable to an increase in inventory related charges, including write-downs
for certain obsolete and excess inventory of $8.8 million and the decrease in revenue volume during 2001 discussed above. In addition, warranty expense increased by $1.6 million due to the AirSite warranty replacement program whereby we replaced
defective parts in over 400 AirSites. The expense was incurred during the first six months of 2001 and is not expected to continue.

Research and development: Research and
development expenses decreased $4.0 million or 13.6% from $29.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 to $25.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This decrease resulted from the actions taken during the fiscal year ended December
31, 2001 to limit discretionary spending. These actions included focusing development in the areas with the greatest near-term revenue potential.

Sales and marketing: Sales and
marketing expenses increased $1.5 million or 14.4% from $10.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 to $11.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This increase was attributable to costs associated with an expansion in the first half
of

12



---

##### Table of Contents

2001 for anticipated international orders and distribution activities and support of large operator trials. One of these trials resulted in revenue booked
during 2001.

Gain on vendor settlements: The Company recorded a gain on vendor settlements of $1,921,605 during 2001 as compared to $0 during 2000. The gain was a result of a
Company program to enter into agreements with certain vendors to settle outstanding payables in exchange for releasing the Company from future obligations.

General and
administrative: General and administrative expenses decreased $0.9 million or 7.1% from $12.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 to $11.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the
provision for bad debts, and our directed savings initiatives limiting and focusing discretionary spending. The savings initiatives were accomplished through a reduction in the aggregate workforce of the Company, consolidation of facilities, and an
adjustment in certain business functions streamlining the organization. These savings initiatives are reflected in a greatly reduced level of general and administrative expenses as a percent of revenue generated in the fourth quarter of 2001.

LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES, AND GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been
prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business; and, as a consequence, the financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. We have experienced net operating losses and negative cash
flows since inception and, as of December 31, 2002, we had an accumulated deficit of $218.5 million. Cash used in operations for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 was $1.1 million and $48.2 million, respectively. We expect to have an
operating loss in 2003. At December 31, 2002, our principal source of liquidity was $3.2 million of cash and cash equivalents. Such conditions raise substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern without receiving additional
funding. As of March 28, 2003 our cash balance was $3.7 million, after the draw of $4.8 million against our Bridge Loan for interim funding.The amounts drawn against the bridge loan are due and payable
on May 24, 2003. In addition, on the same date we had a revenue backlog of $5.3 million. Our current 2003 operating plan projects that cash available from planned revenue combined with the $3.7 million on hand at March 28, 2003 will not be adequate
to defer the requirement for additional funding. We are currently negotiating additional financing of $16 million with two Investors, which if successful, (a portion will be used to pay off the bridge loan) would provide the capital we require to
continue operations. There can be no assurances that the proposed financing can be finalized on terms acceptable to us, if at all, or that the funding negotiated will be adequate to sustain operations through 2003.

Our future results of operations involve a number of significant risks and uncertainties. The worldwide market for telecommunications products such as those sold by us has seen dramatic reductions in
demand as compared to the late 1990s and 2000. It is uncertain as to when or whether market conditions will improve. We have been negatively impacted by this reduction in global demand and by our weak balance sheet. Other factors that could
affect our future operating results and cause actual results to vary from expectations include, but are not limited to, ability to raise capital, dependence on key personnel, dependence on a limited number of customers (with one customer accounting
for 49% of the revenue for 2002), ability to design new products, the erosion of product prices, ability to overcome deployment and installation challenges in developing countries which may include political and civil risks and risks relating to
environmental conditions, product obsolescence, ability to generate consistent sales, ability to finance research and development, government regulation, technological innovations and acceptance, competition, reliance on certain vendors and credit
risks. Our ultimate ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time will depend on our increasing our revenues and/or reducing our expenses and securing enough additional funding to enable us to reach profitability. Our
historical sales results and our current backlog do not give us sufficient visibility or predictability to indicate when the required higher sales levels might be achieved, if at all. Additional funding will be required prior to reaching
profitability. To obtain additional funding, we have entered into discussions with SCP II and TECORE concerning a proposed financing of $16,000,000 discussed below. No assurances can be given that either the proposed financing or additional equity
or debt financing will be arranged on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

If we are unable to finalize the proposed financing, we will have to seek additional funding or
dramatically reduce our expenditures and it is likely that we will be required to discontinue operations. It is unlikely that we will achieve profitable operations in the near term and therefore it is likely our operations will continue to consume
cash in the foreseeable future. We have limited cash resources and therefore we must reduce our negative cash flows in the near term to continue operations. There can be no assurances that we will succeed in achieving our goals or finalize the
proposed financing, and failure to do so in the near term will have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results and our ability to continue as a going concern. As a consequence, we may be forced to
seek protection under the bankruptcy laws. In that event, it is unclear whether we could successfully reorganize our capital structure and operations, or whether we could realize sufficient value for our assets to satisfy fully our debts.
Accordingly, should we file for bankruptcy there is no assurance that our stockholders would receive any value.

Prior to our initial public offering in December 1999, which
raised net proceeds of $80.4 million, we funded our operations primarily through the private sales of equity securities and through capital equipment leases. At December 31, 2002, our principal source of liquidity was $3.2 million of cash and cash
equivalents.

On May 16, 2001, we issued and sold 955,414 shares of preferred stock to three existing stockholders, SCP Private Equity Partners II, L.P. (SCP II),
Tandem PCS Investments (Tandem), LP and Mellon Ventures LP (Mellon), at $31.40 per share for a total face value of $30 million. The preferred stock is redeemable at any time after May 31, 2006 out of funds legally available
for such purposes and initially each share of preferred stock is convertible, at any time, into ten shares of our common stock. Dividends accrue to the preferred stockholders, whether or not declared, at 8% cumulatively per annum. The preferred
stockholders are entitled to votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which each share of preferred stock converts and collectively to designate two members of the Board of Directors. Upon liquidation of the Company, or if a majority
of the preferred stockholders agree to treat a change in control or a sale of all or substantially all of our assets (with certain exceptions) as a liquidation, the preferred stockholders are entitled to 200% of their initial purchase price plus
accrued but unpaid dividends before any payments to any other stockholders. In association with this preferred stock investment, we issued immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 2,866,242 shares of our common stock for $3.14 per share, which
expire on May 14, 2011. The proceeds from the sale of the preferred stock were used to fund our operations from May 2001 into 2002. Effective October 31, 2002, the preferred stockholders irrevocably and permanently waived the right of optional
redemption applicable to the Series B Preferred Stock as set forth in the Certificate of Designation and the right to treat a specific proposed Sale of the Corporation as a Liquidation Event, to the extent that such treatment
would entitle the Series B Holders to receive their Liquidation Amount per share in a form different from the consideration to be paid to holders of our common stock in connection with such Sale of the Corporation.

On January 24, 2003, we entered into a Bridge Loan Agreement with SCP II, an affiliate of our Chairman, James W. Brown, and TECORE, Inc., our largest customer based on revenues during the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2002, and a supplier of switching equipment to us (TECORE). We issued two Bridge Loan Promissory Notes under the Bridge Loan Agreement, each in a principal amount of $3.0 million (the Bridge Notes or the
Bridge Loan). The Bridge Notes carry an interest rate of two percent over the prime rate published inThe Wall Street Journaland become due and payable on May 24, 2003. The Bridge Loan
Agreement provides that the Bridge Notes are secured by a security interest in all of our assets including, without limitation, our intellectual property. To date, we have received advances totaling $4.8 million under the Bridge Notes. We are
currently negotiating a definitive funding agreement, under which SCP II and TECORE would provide us financing of $16.0 million in the form of secured notes convertible into our common stock. The proceeds of this proposed financing would be used to
refund the advances under the Bridge Loan Agreement and to fund our operations. See Note 16 to Financial Statements, Subsequent Events, for a further explanation of the Bridge Loan Agreement and the proposed financing.



13



---

##### Table of Contents



NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net cash used in operating activities was approximately $62.6 million in 2000, $48.2 million in 2001 and $1.1 million in 2002. For the year ended December 31, 2002 the cash provided through customer deposits and a
reduction in both inventories and receivables was offset by the net loss incurred. We were able to reduce our inventory balance through fulfillment of customer orders. As of December 31, 2002, our net accounts receivable balance was $0.6 million. Of
this balance 71% is attributable to two customers. During the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 the significant use of cash by operating activities was the result of the net losses together with the payment of accrued expenses associated with a
reduction in workforce and the reduction in accounts payable resulting from the vendor settlements offset by gains discussed previously. Except for sales to OEMs or to customers under agreements providing for acceptance concurrent with shipment, our
customers are billed as contractual milestones are met. Deposits ranging between 10% and 50% of the contracted amount typically are received at the inception of the contract and an additional percentage of the contracted amount is generally billed
upon shipment. The terms vary from contract to contract but are always agreed to in the initial contract. Most of the remaining unbilled amounts are invoiced after a customer has placed the products in service, completed specified acceptance testing
procedures or has otherwise accepted the product. Collection of the entire amounts due under our contracts to date have lagged behind shipment of our products due to the time period between shipment and fulfillment of all of our applicable
post-shipment contractual obligations, the time at which we bill the remaining balance of the contracted amount. This lag will require an increase in investments in working capital as our revenues increase. As of December 31, 2002, our total notes
receivable balance was $1.2 million, all of which was attributable to one customer. The customer is making monthly payments of principal and interest to satisfy this note receivable.

NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES

We used net cash for capital expenditures of approximately $8.7 million, $3.1 million, and $0.2
million for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001, and 2002, respectively. During 2002, we significantly reduced the level of capital expenditures, as the physical assets available are adequate to meet our needs at this time. Our capital
expenditures for testing and manufacturing equipment used during final assembly of our products will increase if our revenues increase.

We lease our primary manufacturing and
office facilities under long-term non-cancelable operating leases. We also have operating leases for certain other furniture, equipment and computers. We used net cash for operating leases of approximately $1.2 million, $1.4 million and $0.6 million
for the years ended December 31, 2000, December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2002, respectively. Future minimum payments for operating leases (including payments under our new lease for final assembly and testing facilities in Melbourne, Florida)
aggregated through the year 2005 were approximately $0.5 million as of December 31, 2002 and we expect to spend approximately $374,365 for those leases in 2003.

NET CASH
PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2002 was $0.4 million resulted primarily from the payments
on capital leases of $0.3 million. We had no debt facilities outstanding as of December 31, 2002. On January 24, 2003 we issued two Bridge Loan Promissory Notes in an aggregate of $6 million, to two investors with an initial draw of $1.6 million.
Maximum cumulative draws, including the initial draw of $1.6 million may be made according to the following schedule:



|DRAW DOWN DATE             |  | CUMULATIVE AMOUNT |          
|-------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ---------
|                           |  |                   |          
|Prior to February 24, 2003 |  | $                 | 1,600,000
|Prior to March 25, 2003    |  | $                 | 3,200,000
|Prior to April 24, 2003    |  | $                 | 4,800,000
|On or after April 24, 2003 |  | $                 | 6,000,000

14



---

##### Table of Contents

As of March 28, 2003, in accordance with the above schedule, the investors have advanced a total of $4.8 million to the Company, the most recent advance of
$1.6 million having been made on March 26, 2003. There can be no assurance that the final draw of $1.2 million against the Bridge Loan will be fulfilled as we request, if at all.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2001 was $27.2 million and was due to net proceeds received from the sale of convertible preferred stock in May 2001 of $30.0 million (a portion of which was used to
reduce accounts payable in our vendor settlement program).

Net cash used by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2000 of $0.3 million resulted primarily from the
payments on capital leases of $0.9 million offset by the cash provided from the exercise of stock options raising $0.7 million.

We lease certain computer and test equipment under
capital lease arrangements. We used net cash for capital leases of approximately $0.9 million, $1.3 million and $0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2000, December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2002, respectively. Future minimum payments for
capital leases aggregated through the year 2005 were approximately $80, 000 as of December 31, 2002.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

We continually evaluate the accounting policies and estimates that we use to prepare our financial statements. In general, managements estimates are based on historical experience, on
information from third party professionals and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates made by management.

Revenue Recognition Revenue from product sales is recognized after delivery and determination that the fee is fixed and determinable, collectibilty is probable, and
after the resolution of uncertainties regarding satisfaction of significant terms and conditions of the customer contract. Revenue for sales to OEMs is recognized when title to the product passes to the OEM customer. Typically, for these product
sales, title passes to the customer at the point of shipment.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for
estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be
required. The allowance is reduced when a customer which previously was deemed a collection risk makes payments to the Company eliminating the need for the allowance or when a receivable is written off.

Accounting for Inventories We write down our inventories for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated
market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-offs may be required beyond the writeoff that was previously
taken.

Long-lived AssetsWe review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets totaled $10.3 million as of December 31, 2002 including licensing and software development costs. Upon our determination that the carrying value of the asset is impaired,
we would record an impairment charge or loss. Unsuccessful product marketing or continued substantial operating losses could result in an inability to recover the carrying value of the investment; and therefore, might require an impairment charge in
the future.

Recent Pronouncements In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued two new
pronouncements: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (Statement) No. 141, Business Combinations (Statement 141) and Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, (Statement 142). Statement 141 prohibits the use
of the pooling-of-interest method for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and also applies to all business combinations accounted for by the purchase method that are completed after June 30, 2001. There are also transition provisions
that apply to business combinations completed before July 1, 2001, that were accounted for by the purchase method. Statement 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 to all goodwill and other intangible assets recognized
in an entitys statement of financial position at that date, regardless of when those assets were initially recognized. The adoption of Statements 141 and 142, effective January 1, 2002, did not have a material impact on the Company.

In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment of or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (Statement 144). Statement 144 establishes a
single accounting model for all long-lived assets, including business segments, to be disposed of. Under Statement 144, discontinued operations are no longer measured at net realizable value but at fair value. Future operating losses are no longer
included as part of discontinued operations. Statement 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company adopted Statement 144 effective January 1, 2002. The adoption of Statement 144 did not have any impact on the
Company.

On April 30, 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 145,Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical
Corrections (Statement 145) which updates, clarifies and simplifies existing accounting pronouncements. The rescission of FASB Statement No. 4 eliminates the requirement to report all gains and losses resulting from the early extinguishments of
debt as extraordinary items. Statement 145 is effective for all transactions occurring after May 15, 2002, with earlier application encouraged. The Company adopted this Statement to be effective during the quarter ended June 30, 2002. As a result,
the Company has reclassified an extraordinary gain on vendor settlements of $1,921,605 to operating expenses in the accompanying 2001 statement of operations.

In June 2002
the FASB issued Statement No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (Statement 146). Statement 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and
nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-3. Statement 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred and is effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31,
2002. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company.

In December 2002 the FASB issued Statement No. 148, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure - an amendment of Statement No. 123 (Statement 148.) Statement 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for
stock-based employee compensation. This statement also amends the disclosure requirements of Statement 123 and APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require prominent disclosure in both annual and interim financial statements
about method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company has not yet determined whether it will voluntarily change to the fair value based method of accounting for
stock-based compensation.

In November 2002 the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45), Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees,
Including Direct Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. This interpretation requires the Company to record, at the inception of a guarantee, the fair value of the guarantee as a liability, with the offsetting entry being recorded based on the
circumstances in which the guarantee was issued. Fundings under the guarantee are to be recorded as a reduction of the liability. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of FIN 45 in the fourth quarter of 2002 and will apply the initial
recognition and initial measurement provisions on a prospective basis for all guarantees issued after December 31, 2002. Adoption of FIN 45 will have no impact on the Company's historical financial statements, as existing guarantees are not subject
to the measurement provisions of FIN 45. The impact on future financial statements will depend on the nature and extent of any issued guarantees but is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

OTHER INFORMATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company have provided certain certifications to the Securities and Exchange Commission. These certificates accompanied this report when filed with the Commission.

STATUS OF OUR COMMON STOCK LISTING ON NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET

All companies listed on the Nasdaq National Market are required to have net
tangible assets of $4 million, total stockholders equity of $10 million, and a minimum bid price of at least $1.00 per share (or a minimum bid price of at least $5.00 per share with no net tangible asset requirement). If a stock fails to trade
at that level for thirty consecutive business days, NASDAQ will notify the company of its deficiency in writing. The company then has ninety days to cure the deficiency and return its stock to compliance for at least ten consecutive business days
(but possibly longer at the discretion of NASDAQ). We have not complied with NASDAQs listing requirement of a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share since September 2002 and were notified of this deficiency by NASDAQ October 8, 2002 and had
until January 6, 2003 to cure this deficiency. On March 19, 2003, we received a notice from NASDAQ that the compliance period was extended for an additional ninety days. As a result, we have until April 7, 2003 to satisfy the minimum bid price
requirement.

In addition, under the NASDAQ listing requirements, a companys board of directors must have an audit committee consisting of at least three members comprised
solely of independent directors (as defined under the NASDAQ rules). Our audit committee currently consists of two members, each of whom we believe qualifies as an independent director. Our board of directors has appointed
Gerald Y. Hattori to fill a vacant seat on the board effective on April 1, 2003. Mr. Hattori, who is a former Chief Financial Officer of the Company, is expected to serve as the third independent director on our audit committee and may qualify as a
financial expert (as defined under the new federal corporate governance rules).

Should NASDAQ proceed with delisting, we intend to appeal.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS; RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

This report contains forward-looking statements, including
statements under the captions Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Business and elsewhere in this report, concerning our expectations of future sales, gross profits,
earnings, research and development expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses, product development and introductions and cash requirements. Forward-looking statements often include words or phrases such as will likely result,
expect, will continue, anticipate, estimate, intend, plan, project, outlook or similar expressions. These statements are only predictions and are not
guarantees of future performance. They are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the
forward-looking statements. Actual results may vary materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect

15



---

##### Table of Contents

our managements view only as of the date of this report. We are not obligated to update these statements or publicly release the results of any
revisions to them to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Certain risk factors, which
could cause actual results to differ from expectations, are set forth below. We cannot assure you that one or more of these factors will not adversely affect our results of operations.

RISK FACTORS

You should consider each of the following factors as well as the other information in this Annual Report in evaluating our
business and our prospects. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations. If
any of the following risks actually occur, our business and financial results could be harmed. In that case the trading price of our common stock could decline. You should also refer to the other information set forth in this Annual Report,
including our financial statements and the related notes.

A long-lasting downturn in the global economy that impacts the wireless communications industry could negatively
affect our revenues and operating results. The global economy is in the midst of a slowdown that has had wide-ranging effects on markets that we serve, particularly wireless communications equipment manufacturers and network
operators. This downturn has had a negative effect on our revenues. We cannot predict the depth or duration of this downturn, and if it grows more severe or continues for a long period of time, our ability to increase or maintain our revenues and
operating results may be impaired. In addition, because we intend to continue to invest in research and development during this downturn and to maintain ongoing customer service and support capability, any decline in the rate of growth of our
revenues will have a significant adverse impact on our operating results.

Current economic conditions affecting the wireless communications industry may lead prospective and
existing customers to postpone their purchasing decisions. The industry wide decrease in demand for wireless telecommunications infrastructure has adversely affected us. We cannot predict when the demand will increase or when
many of our customers and potential customers will start to make significant purchases of our products.

We have incurred significant losses since we began doing business. We
anticipate continuing losses and may never achieve or sustain profitability. We have accumulated losses of $218.5 million since we began doing business in 1994 through December 31, 2002, and we may never achieve or sustain
profitability. We will need to generate significantly higher revenues to achieve and sustain profitability. Since we began doing business in 1994, we have generated $98.2 million in net revenues through December 31, 2002. We have been marketing our
GSM base stations since 1996. We have never reported a profit. We will continue to incur significant research and product development, sales and marketing, materials and general administrative expenses, and we expect our expenses to increase as
compared to prior periods, as we expand our sales force and our international operations. We anticipate a net loss for the year 2003 and we may continue to incur losses beyond 2003. We cannot be certain that we will realize sufficient revenues or
margins to sustain our business.

We may not be able to obtain additional capital to fund our operations on reasonable terms and this could hurt our business and negatively
impact our stockholders. If adequate funds in the form of equity or debt are not available on reasonable terms or terms acceptable to us, we may be unable to continue as a going concern. If we raise additional funds through
the issuance of convertible debt or additional equity securities, the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders may be reduced, the securities issued may have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock,
and the terms of the securities may impose restrictions on our operations. While the vendors holding a security interest in our assets have agreed to subordinate their liens to a secured lender who loans at least $6 million to us, until these
vendors are paid in full, we may not be able to borrow secured financing of less than $6 million. We have secured commitments for interim financing in the amount of $6 million from TECORE and SCP II, and have drawn down a total of $4.8 million
against the Bridge Loan to date but the terms of the interim financing required us to pledge all of our assets as collateral. In addition, there can be no assurances that the final advance under the Bridge Loan of $1.2 million will be made in a
timely manner.

If the proposed $16 million financing by SCP II and TECORE does not close, we may be forced to seek protection under the federal bankruptcy laws. If the investors determine not to proceed with the proposed financing or our stockholders do not approve it, the investors could demand payment when the Bridge Notes become due on May 24, 2003. If we are unable to raise capital from another
source or are otherwise unable to pay the principal amount and accrued interest on the Bridge Notes when due, the Investors could foreclose on the Bridge Notes and force a sale of our assets, including our intellectual property. Under such
circumstances, we are likely to cease operations or file for protection from claims of our creditors under the federal bankruptcy laws.

The proposed financing would
significantly dilute the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders.If shares of our common stock are issued to the investors upon conversion of the secured convertible notes to be issued pursuant to the proposed
financing and any interest due on the notes or exercise of the warrants, existing stockholders would have their ownership percentage substantially diluted. The number of shares of common stock issuable under the terms of the proposed financing will
also affect our earnings per share on a going-forward basis. The larger the number of shares deemed outstanding, the lower the earnings per share will be. The actual effect of the proposed financing on our earnings per share will depend on the level
of our earnings in future periods, the actual conversion prices of the notes and the impact of the accounting treatment of the proposed financing.

We have a limited operating
history.You should not rely on our recent results as an indication of our future results. Our base stations are being used in twenty-five commercially deployed systems. We had net revenues of $34.3 million, $14.5 million and
$23.0 million in 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively. Unless we can achieve significant increases in market acceptance of our products, we may never advance beyond our market penetration phase. Due to our limited operating history, it is difficult or
impossible for us to predict future results and you should not expect future revenue growth based on our recent results. You should consider our business and prospects in light of the risks and problems faced by technology companies in the early
stages of development.

16



---

##### Table of Contents

Our operating results are subject to substantial quarterly and annual fluctuations and to market downturns.Our revenues, earnings
and other operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and may fluctuate significantly in the future. General economic or other conditions causing a downturn in the market for our products or technology, affecting the timing of
customer orders or causing cancellations or rescheduling of orders could also adversely affect our operating results. Moreover, our customers may change delivery schedules or cancel or reduce orders without incurring significant penalties and
generally are not subject to minimum purchase requirements.

Our future operating results will be affected by many factors, including the following:

Changes in the growth rate of the wireless communications industry;

Consolidation in the
wireless communications industry;

The collectibility of our trade receivables;

Our ability to retain existing or secure anticipated customers or orders, both domestically and internationally;

The
availability and cost of products and services from our third-party suppliers;

Our ability to develop, introduce and market new technology, products and
services on a timely basis;

Foreign currency fluctuations, inflation and deflation;

Decreases in average selling prices or demand for our products;

Intellectual property disputes and litigation;

Government regulations;

Product defects;

Management of inventory in response to shifts in market demand; and

Changes in the mix
of technology and products developed, produced and sold.

The foregoing factors are difficult to forecast and these, as well as other factors, could harm our quarterly or annual
operating results. If our operating results fail to meet the expectations of investment analysts or investors in any period, the market price of our common stock may decline.

Our lengthy and variable sales cycle makes it difficult for us to predict if and when a sale will be made and could cause us operating difficulties and cash flow problems. Our sales cycle, which is the period from the
generation of a sales lead until the recognition of revenue, can be long and is unpredictable, making it difficult to forecast revenues and operating results. Our inability to accurately predict the timing and magnitude of our sales could cause a
number of problems:

We may have difficulty meeting our customers delivery requirements in the event many large orders are received in a short period of
time because we have limited production capacity and generally do not carry materials in inventory;

We may expend significant management efforts and incur
substantial sales and marketing expenses in a particular period that do not translate into orders during that period or at all; and

We may have difficulty
meeting our cash flow requirements and obtaining credit because of delays in receiving orders and because the terms of many of our customer contracts defer certain billings until post- shipment contractual milestones are met.

The problems resulting from our lengthy and variable sales cycle could impede our growth, harm our stock price, and restrict our ability to take advantage of new opportunities.

Our stock price is volatile.The stock market in general, and the stock prices of technology-based companies in particular, have experienced extreme
volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of any specific public company. The market price of our common stock has fluctuated in the past and is likely to fluctuate in the future as well. Factors that may have a
significant impact on the market price of our stock include:

17



---

##### Table of Contents

Announcements concerning us or our competitors;

Receipt of substantial orders for base stations;

Quality deficiencies in services or products;

Announcements regarding financial developments or technological innovations;

International developments,
such as technology mandates, political developments or changes in economic policies;

New commercial products;

Changes in recommendations of securities analysts;

Government regulations;

Acts of terrorism or war;

Proprietary rights or product or patent litigation; or

Strategic transactions, such as acquisitions and divestitures.

Our future earnings
and stock price may be subject to significant volatility, particularly on a quarterly basis. Shortfalls in our revenues or earnings in any given period relative to the levels expected by securities analysts could immediately, significantly and
adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

Our stock price may decline significantly if we are delisted from the Nasdaq National Market.
For continued inclusion on the Nasdaq National Market System, we must meet certain tests, including a minimum bid price of $1.00. We currently are not in compliance with the bid price requirement, although we have until April 7, 2003 to cure this
deficiency. If we fail to satisfy the listing standards in the future, Nasdaq may de-list our common stock from its National Market System. If this occurs, trading of our common stock may be conducted on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, the OTC Bulletin
Board or in the over-the-counter market on the Pink Sheets. In any of those cases, investors could find it more difficult to buy or sell, or to obtain accurate quotations as to the value of our common stock. The trading price per share
of our common stock likely would be reduced as a result. We currently do not meet the minimum listing requirements for the Nasdaq National Market (our bid price is less than $1.00 per share). In addition, we may be delisted because our audit
committee does not consist of three independent directors.

Intense competition in the market for wireless telecommunications equipment from many larger, more establishedcompanieswith greater resources could prevent us from increasing our revenue and achieving profitability.The wireless telecommunications infrastructure market is highly
competitive. We compete with large infrastructure manufacturers, systems integrators, and base station subsystem suppliers, as well as new market entrants. Most of our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories and presence in
key markets, larger installed customer bases, substantially greater name recognition, and more financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing, sales, distribution and other resources than we do. We may not be able to compete successfully against
current and future competitors, including companies that develop and market new wireless telecommunications products and services. These competitive pressures may result in price reductions, reduced gross margins, longer sales cycles and loss of
customers. In addition roaming considerations may impede our sales in the North American market.

Competition in the telecommunications market is based on varying combinations,
including:

Comprehensiveness of product and technology solutions;

Manufacturing capability;

Scalability and the ability of the system solution to meet customers immediate and future network requirements;

Product performance and quality;

Design and engineering
capabilities;

Compliance with industry standards;

Time to market;

System cost; and

Customer support.

We anticipate that additional competitors will enter our markets as a result of growth opportunities in wireless telecommunications, the trend toward global expansion by foreign and domestic
competitors, technological and public policy changes and relatively low barriers to entry in selected segments of the industry.

As a result of these factors, these competitors
may be more successful than we are. In addition, we anticipate additional competitors will enter the market for products based on 3G standards. These competitors may have more established relationships and distribution channels in markets not
currently deploying wireless communications technology. These competitors also have established or may establish financial or strategic relationships among themselves or with our existing or potential customers, resellers or other third parties.
These relationships may affect

18



---

##### Table of Contents

customers decisions to purchase products from us. Accordingly, new competitors or alliances among competitors could emerge and rapidly acquire
significant market share to our detriment.

Our comparative inability to provide financing for our customers is a competitive disadvantage and could result in a loss of sales
and/or customers to competitors with greater resources.We do not typically offer financing to our customers, which could cause us to lose business to our larger competitors. Our future success may depend upon our continuing
ability to help arrange financing for our customers. If we cannot assist in arranging financing for our customers, we may lose sales and customers to competitors that directly provide financing.

Credit risk problems resulting from customer financing could hurt our results and require us to raise additional capital.Many of our customers and potential customers are start-up and small
companies with a limited operating history. In some instances, we have provided and will continue to provide customer financing. We face credit risks, including slow payments or non-payments from customers, and we may need to raise additional
capital to support financed sales and to deal with related credit risk problems.

A smallnumberof customers account for
substantially all of our revenues and the loss of any of these customers could hurt our results and cause our stock price to decline.Our customer base has been and may continue to be concentrated with a small number of
customers. The loss of any of these customers or the delay, reduction or cancellation of orders by or shipments to any of these customers could hurt our results and cause a decline in our stock price. The effect of these risks on our operating
results is compounded by our lengthy sales cycle. In 2002, sales to three customers accounted for 74.9% of our total revenue. In 2001 sales to five customers accounted for 68.6% and in 2000 sales to three customers accounted for 61.0% of total
revenue.

The chart below shows the breakout by fiscal year of the concentration of revenue:



|                        |  | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |  
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------ | -
|                        |  |                          |  
|                        |  | 2002                     |  
|                        |  |                          |  
|TECORE Wireless Systems |  | 49.0                     | %
|Telsom Mobile           |  | 21.2                     | %
|MBO Cross               |  | 4.7                      | %
|COMTEL                  |  | 0.4                      | %
|ADAMS                   |  | 1.0                      | %
|Marconi                 |  | 0.1                      | %
|Carolina PCS            |  |                         |  
|Pioneer                 |  | 0.8                      | %

We have a concentrated customer base and the failure of any of our
customers to pay us or to pay us on time could cause significant cash flow problems, hurt our results and cause our stock price to decline. Our concentrated customer base significantly increases the credit risks associated
with slow payments or non-payments by our customers. These risks are also higher for us since many of our customers are start-up and small companies. Two customers accounted for 71% of our outstanding accounts receivable as of December 31, 2002,
with one customer representing 63%. Two customers accounted for 73% of our combined outstanding accounts and notes receivable as of December 31, 2001. Three customers represented 62% of our combined outstanding accounts and notes receivable as of
December 31, 2000. In the past we have incurred bad debt charges and we may be required to do so in the future. The failure of any of our customers to pay us, or to pay us on time, causes significant cash flow problems, hurts our results and could
cause our stock price to decline.

If we continue to expand into international markets, we will become subject to additional business risks.We have
begunmarketingand selling our products internationally in Africa, the Middle East, Asia and Latin America. Our business plan contemplates that a majority of our sales over the next several years will
be in international markets. Our revenues from international customers as a percentage of total revenues were 29.1% in fiscal 2002, 19.2% in fiscal 2001 and 11.8% in fiscal 2000. In many international markets, barriers to entry are created by
long-standing relationships between our potential customers and their local providers and protective regulations, including local content and service requirements. In addition, our pursuit of international growth opportunities may require
significant investments for an extended period before we realize returns, if any, on our investments.

Our international operations could be adversely affected by a variety of
uncontrollable and changing risks and uncertainties, including:

Difficulties and costs associated with obtaining foreign regulatory approval for our
products;

Unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;

Difficulties and costs associated with complying with a wide variety of complex foreign laws and treaties;

Legal uncertainties regarding, and timing
delays and expenses associated with, tariffs, export licenses and other trade barriers;

Inadequate protection of intellectual property in foreign countries;

Increased difficulty in collecting delinquent or unpaid accounts;

Lack of suitable export financing;

19



---

##### Table of Contents

Adverse tax consequences;

Dependence upon
independent sales representatives and other indirect resellers who may not be as effective and reliable as our employees;

Difficulties and costs associated
with staffing and managing international operations, overcoming cultural, linguistic and nationalistic barriers and adapting to foreign business practices;

Political and economic instability; and

Currency fluctuations, including a decrease in the value of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar
which could make our products less competitive against those of foreign competitors.

In addition to general risks associated with our international sales and operations, we are
subject to risks specific to the individual countries in which we do business. A portion of our international sales efforts will be targeted to service operators who plan to deploy wireless communications networks in developing countries where risks
ordinarily associated with international operations are particularly acute, including developing countries in Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Latin America.

Any of these
factors could impair our ability to expand into international markets and could prevent us from increasing our revenues and achieving profitability.

Our business and
operating results may be harmed by inflation and deflation. Inflation has had and may continue to have adverse effects on the economies and securities markets of certain countries and could have adverse effects on our
customers, including their ability to obtain financing and repay debts. Brazil and Mexico, for example, have periodically experienced relatively high rates of inflation and currency devaluation. Significant inflation or deflation could have a
material adverse effect on our business, operating results, liquidity and financial position.

If we do not succeed in the development of new products and product features in
response to changing technology and standards, customers will not buy our products. We need to develop new products and product features in response to the evolving demands for better technology or our customers will not buy
our products. The market for our products is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, emerging wireless transmission standards, and frequent new product introductions and enhancements. If we fail to develop our
technology, we will lose significant potential market share to our competitors.

Our failure to comply with evolving industry standards could delay our introduction of new
products. An international consortium of standards bodies has established the specifications for the third generation (3G) wireless standard, and is further working to establish the specifications of a future wireless
standard and its interoperability with existing standards. Any failure of our products to comply with 3G or future standards could delay their introduction and require costly and time-consuming engineering changes. After the future standard is
adopted, any delays in our introduction of next generation products could impair our ability to grow revenues in the future. As a result, we may be unable to achieve or sustain profitability. Even if we do develop our technology and products to work
with these new standards, consumer demand for advanced wireless services may not be sufficient to justify network operators upgrading to them.

A reduction or interruption in
component supply or a significant increase in component prices could have a material adverse effectonour business or profitability. Our ability to meet customer demands
depends, in part, on our ability to obtain timely and adequate delivery of parts and components from our suppliers and internal manufacturing capacity. We have experienced component shortages in the past, including components for our integrated
circuit products, that have adversely affected our operations. Although we work closely with our suppliers to avoid these types of shortages, we may continue to encounter these problems in the future. A reduction or interruption in component supply
or a significant increase in the price or one or more components could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may not be able to adequately protect or defend our
proprietary rights, which would hurt our ability to compete. Although we attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through patents, trademarks, trade secrets, copyrights, and nondisclosure agreements and other
measures, intellectual property is difficult to evaluate and these measures may not provide adequate protection for our proprietary rights and information. Patent filings by third parties, whether made before or after the date of our filings, could
render our intellectual property less valuable. Competitors may misappropriate our proprietary rights and information, disputes as to ownership of intellectual property may arise, and our proprietary rights and information may otherwise become known
or independently developed by competitors. The failure to protect our proprietary rights could seriously harm our business, operating results and financial condition. We have a relatively low number of inventions for which patents have been granted
or patent applications are pending internationally. If we do not obtain sufficient international protection for our intellectual property, our competitiveness in international markets could be significantly impaired, which would limit our growth and
future revenues.

Others may bring infringement claims against us that could be time-consuming and expensive to defend. In the future, claims of
infringement of other parties proprietary rights, invalidity claims or claims for indemnification resulting from infringement claims may be asserted or prosecuted against us. Even if none of these claims were valid or successful, we would be
forced to incur significant costs and divert important resources to defend against them. Any claim of infringement, whether or not successful, could cause us considerable expense and place a significant burden on our management.

A significant decrease in the cost of digital T-1/E-1 phone lines or microwave will diminish one of our competitive advantages. Existing base stations require an
expensive physical communications link, usually through a digital T-1/E-1 phone line or microwave, to the wireline network.

20



---

##### Table of Contents

Any significant decrease in the cost of digital T-1/E-1 phone lines or microwave used to connect base stations to the wireline network, especially in less
populated areas, will diminish a cost advantage that we currently use to market our products. The cost of T-1/E-1 or microwave facilities has recently declined significantly in urban areas because of increased competition.

If we fail to expand our customer base beyond the smaller operators, we may not be able to significantly grow our revenues. We will only be able to significantly grow our
revenues if we can expand our customer base beyond the smaller operators. There are a limited number of such operators and most of them have limited resources. These operators are less stable and more susceptible to delays in their buildouts and
deployments than more established operators. We plan on expanding our sales to include the larger domestic operators and international operators. However, as a result of the rapid consolidation of larger domestic GSM operators, there are only a few
larger domestic operators remaining. To date we have not had any sales to the larger domestic operators, and we may not be successful in those markets in the future.

Our
reliance on a limited number of suppliers could lead to delays, additional costs, problems with our customers and potentialcustomers, and loss of revenue. We plan to continue
utilizing only one or a small number of suppliers for each of the components of our base station systems. We have no long-term contracts or arrangements with any of our suppliers that guarantee product availability or the continuation of particular
payment or credit terms. If, for any reason, a supplier fails to meet our quality and quantity requirements or stops selling products to us at commercially reasonable prices, we could experience significant production delays and cost increases, as
well as higher warranty expenses and product image problems. Any of these problems could damage relationships with current or prospective customers, which could seriously harm our operating results in a given period and impair our ability to
generate future sales.

From time to time, we must replace some of the components of our products when the supplier of that component is discontinuing production. While we
generally do not maintain an inventory of components, sometimes we do purchase an inventory of these discontinued components so that we can maintain production while finding new suppliers or developing substitute components ourselves. We face the
risk that we may deplete that inventory before finding an adequate substitute, and that could cause the loss of significant sales opportunities. Alternatively, we could purchase too many of the components and may be left with excess inventory on our
hands. We generally do not maintain an inventory of finished goods and many components have long lead times, with some taking 12 to 16 weeks from the time of entry of the order to delivery. We cannot guarantee that alternative sources of supply can
be arranged on short notice or that components will be available from alternative sources on satisfactory terms.

If we lose key personnel or are unable to hire additional
qualified personnel, we may not be able to operate our business successfully. Our future success largely depends on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled hardware and software engineers, particularly call
processing engineers and digital signal processing engineers. If we cannot continue to attract and retain quality personnel, that failure would significantly limit our ability to compete and to grow our business. Our success also depends upon the
continuing contributions of our key management, research, product development, sales and marketing and manufacturing personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. Except for an employment and severance agreement we have with Glenn Ehley,
our CEO and President, and a noncompetition agreement that we have with Terry Williams, our CTO, we do not have employment or noncompetition agreements with any of our key officers. We also do not have key man life insurance policies covering any of
our employees. See Part I, Employees for discussion of potential impediments to retention of key personnel.

If we fail to manage our operations efficiently, our business and
prospects could be seriously harmed. The need to develop and offer our products and implement our business plan in a difficult market will significantly challenge our planning and management capabilities. We may not be able
to implement management information and control systems in an efficient and timely manner. If we are unable to manage our operations efficiently, our business and prospects could be seriously harmed. To manage our operations and personnel, we will
need to:

Improvefinancialand operational controls, as well as our reporting systems and procedures;

Install new management information systems; and

Train, motivate and manage our sales and
marketing, engineering, technical, finance and customer support employees.

We have an agreement with Motorola, Inc. to grant them rights, which could harm our
business. When Motorola purchased $10.0 million of our Series B Preferred Stock in 1995, we granted Motorola the right to acquire a worldwide, nonexclusive, royalty-free license under any two of our patents. Motorola is a
large telecommunications and technology company with significant resources and could exercise this right at any time and begin using these licenses to compete against us. With respect to any possible infringement of our respective digital base
station patents, Motorola has agreed with us not to enjoin the other and to attempt dispute resolution, including negotiation of nonexclusive license agreements in good faith, before resorting to litigation.

We expect the prices of our products to decline due to competitive pressures, and this decline could reduce our revenues and gross margins. We anticipate that the prices of our products will
decrease in the future due to competitive pricing pressures, increased sales discounts, new product introductions or other factors. If we are unable to offset these factors by increasing our sales volumes, our revenues will decline. In addition, to
maintain our gross margins, we must develop and introduce new products and product enhancements, and we must continue to reduce the manufacturing costs of our products. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to do these things successfully. Our
failure to do so would cause our revenue and gross margins to decline, which could seriously harm our operating results and cause the price of our common stock to decline.

We
may make future acquisitions that dilute our stockholders percentage ownership, cause us to incur debt or assume contingent liabilities andsubjectus to other risks. We
expect to review opportunities to buy other businesses or technologies that would complement our current products, expand the breadth of our markets, enhance our technical capabilities, help secure critical sources of supply or that may
otherwise

21



---

##### Table of Contents

offer growth opportunities. While we have no current agreements or negotiations underway, we may buy businesses, products or technologies in the future. In
the event of any future purchases, we could:

Issue stock that would dilute our current stockholders percentage ownership;

Incur debt; or

Assume liabilities.

These purchases also involve numerous risks, including:

Problems combining the purchased operations, technologies or products;

Unanticipated costs;

Diversion of managements attention from our core business;

Adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers;

Risks associated with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience; and

Potential loss of key employees of
purchased organizations.

Our industry is subject to extensive government regulation that could cause significant delays and expense. Wireless
telecommunications are subject to extensive regulation by the U.S. and foreign governments. If we fail to conform our products to regulatory requirements or experience any delays in obtaining regulatory approvals, we could lose sales. Moreover, in
most cases, we only plan to qualify our products in a foreign country once we have a purchase order from a customer located there, and this practice may deter customers or contribute to delays in receiving or filling orders.

Continuing regulatory compliance could be expensive and may require time-consuming and costly modifications of our products. Any failure of domestic and international regulatory authorities to
allocate suitable frequency spectrum could limit our growth opportunities and our future revenues.

Because our products are highly complex and are deployed in complex
networks, they may have errors or defects that we find only after deployment, which if not remedied could harm our business. Our products are highly complex, are designed to be deployed in complex networks and may contain
undetected defects, errors or failures. Although our products are tested during manufacturing and prior to deployment, they can only be fully tested when deployed in commercial networks. Consequently, our customers may discover errors after the
products have been deployed. The occurrence of any defects, errors or failures could result in installation delays, product returns, diversion of our resources, increased service and warranty costs, legal actions by our customers, increased
insurance costs and other losses to us or to our customers or end users. Any of these occurrences could also result in the loss of or delay in market acceptance of our products, which would harm our business and adversely affect our operating
results and financial condition.

Directors and officers insurance may be difficult or cost prohibitive to obtain. Our current
directors and officers insurance policy was difficult and expensive to obtain. The policy will expire on December 6, 2003. It may be difficult and/or it will be expensive to secure a replacement policy. If we are unable to renew or
secure a replacement policy, we could lose our officers and directors and it will be extremely difficult to recruit qualified replacements for our management team and board of directors, which would have a material adverse affect on our business.

Control by our existing stockholders could discourage the potential acquisition of our business. As of February 3, 2003, 5% or greater stockholders
and their affiliates owned 9.6 million shares of our common stock or approximately 40.4% of our outstanding shares of common stock. In addition, three of these stockholders hold the rights to conversion of another 13.0 million shares of common
stock. Acting together, these stockholders would be able to control all matters requiring approval by stockholders, including the election of directors. Moreover, if TECORE and SCP II invest $16,000,000 in the Company, under the terms of the
proposed financing as currently contemplated, the combined interests of the two investors will constitute a controlling interest in the Company, with TECORE holding a majority of the outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis (assuming conversion
of TECORE's Note). This concentration of ownership could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our business or otherwise discouraging a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control of us, which could prevent our
stockholders from realizing a premium over the market price for their shares of common stock.

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We have no derivative financial instruments or derivative
commodity instruments in our cash and cash equivalents. We invest the proceeds from our financing activities in interest bearing, investment grade securities that mature within 24 months. Our transactions are generally conducted, and our accounts
are denominated, in United States dollars. Accordingly, these funds were not exposed to significant foreign currency risk at December 31, 2002.

22



---

##### Table of Contents

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Our balance sheet as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 and the report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Auditors (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs related to substantial doubt as to the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern, to the Company's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145 and to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 17), are included as an annex to this annual report on Form
10-K/A beginning on page F-1.

SELECTED QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The
following table sets forth unaudited quarterly financial data for the four quarters in 2001 and 2002 and such information expressed as a percentage of our net revenues. This unaudited quarterly information has been prepared on the same basis as the
audited financial information presented elsewhere in this report and, in managements opinion, includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of the information for
the quarters presented.



|                                                     |  | QUARTER ENDED
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------
|                                                     |  |              
|                                                     |  | MAR. 312001  
|                                                     |  |              
|                                                     |  |              
|Net revenues                                         |  | $            
|Cost of revenues                                     |  | 6,264        
|Write down of obsolete and excess inventory          |  | (176         
|                                                     |  |              
|Gross Profit (loss)                                  |  | 306          
|OPERATING EXPENSES (GAINS):                          |  |              
|Research and development                             |  | 8,656        
|Sales and marketing                                  |  | 4,173        
|General and administrative                           |  | 2,172        
|Gain on vendor settlements                           |  |              
|                                                     |  |              
|Total operating expenses                             |  | 15,001       
|Other income (expense), net                          |  | 360          
|                                                     |  |              
|Net loss                                             |  | (14,335      
|Accretion of discount redeemable preferred stock    |  |             
|Accretion of cumulative dividends on preferred stock |  |             
|                                                     |  |              
|Net loss attributable to common stock                |  | $            
|                                                     |  |              

|(1) | Subsequent to the issuance of its quarterly financial statements for the quarters ended June 30, 2002 and September 30, 2002, the Company determined that gains on vendor settlements of approximately $30,000 and $674,000,
respectively, previously classified as extraordinary should have been classified as operating to comply with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145. Accordingly statements of operations for those interim periods have been restated. The
reclassification had no effect on net loss or net loss attributable to common stock for any period.                                                                                 
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | Extraordinary gain on vendor settlements reclassified to operating expenses to conform with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(3) | Subsequent to the issuance of its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company determined that the remaining discount resulting from the beneficial conversion feature
should have been fully amortized as of October 31, 2002 as a result of the waiver of the right of optional redemption to comply with Emerging Issues Task Force 00-27. Accordingly, the statement of operations for the quarter ended December 31, 2002
has been restated from the amount of the accretion of discount - redeemable preferred stock and net loss attributable to common stock of approximately $542,000 and $4,691,000 respectively, previously reported.



23



---

##### Table of Contents

|                                                   |  | QUARTER ENDED                   |   
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | --
|                                                   |  |                                 |   
|                                                   |  | MAR. 312001                     |   
|                                                   |  |                                 |   
|                                                   |  | (AS PERCENTAGE OF NET REVENUES) |   
|Net revenues                                       |  | 100.0                           | % 
|Cost of revenues                                   |  | 98.0                            | % 
|Write down of obsolete and excess inventory        |  | (2.8                            | )%
|                                                   |  |                                 |   
|Gross Profit (loss)                                |  | 4.8                             | % 
|Operating expenses                                 |  |                                 |   
|Research and development                           |  | 135.4                           | % 
|Sales and marketing                                |  | 65.2                            | % 
|General and administrative                         |  | 34.0                            | % 
|Gain on vendor settlements                         |  |                                |   
|                                                   |  |                                 |   
|Total operating expenses.                          |  | 234.6                           | % 
|Other income (expense), net                        |  | 5.6                             | % 
|                                                   |  |                                 |   
|Net loss                                           |  | (224.2                          | )%
|Accretion of discount --redeemable preferred stock |  |                                |   
|Dividends on preferred stock                       |  |                                |   
|                                                   |  |                                 |   
|Net loss attributable to common stock              |  | (224.2                          | )%
|                                                   |  |                                 |   

Calculations adjusted from those previously reported for the quarters
ended September 30, 2001, December 31, 2001 and June 30, 2002 and September 30, 2002 for effects of reclassification adjustments described in notes to results table above.

There
were no material fourth quarter adjustments to cost of revenue or expenses.

We have experienced and expect to continue to experience significant fluctuations in quarterly
operating results as a result of many factors. We believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results are not meaningful and should not be relied upon as any indication of future performance. It is likely that future quarterly
operating results from time to time will not meet the expectations of market analysts or investors, which may have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

PART III

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The directors and executive officers of the Company are:

|NAME                        |  | AGE |  | POSITION                                                                 
|--------------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                            |  |     |  |                                                                          
|Glenn A. Ehley              |  | 41  |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director                          
|                            |  |     |  |                                                                          
|James W. Brown(2)           |  | 51  |  | Chairman                                                                 
|                            |  |     |  |                                                                          
|Darrell Lance Maynard(1)(2) |  | 49  |  | Director                                                                 
|                            |  |     |  |                                                                          
|George M. Calhoun(1).       |  | 50  |  | Director                                                                 
|                            |  |     |  |                                                                          
|Joseph F. Gerrity           |  | 50  |  | Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer         
|                            |  |     |  |                                                                          
|Stuart P. Dawley            |  | 40  |  | Vice President, General Counsel, Investor Relations Officer and Secretary
|                            |  |     |  |                                                                          
|Timothy J. Mahar.           |  | 55  |  | Vice President of Worldwide Sales                                        
|                            |  |     |  |                                                                          
|Thomas R. Schmutz           |  | 41  |  | Vice President of Engineering                                            
|                            |  |     |  |                                                                          
|William J. Lee              |  | 47  |  | Vice President of Operations                                             
|                            |  |     |  |                                                                          
|Bennet Wong                 |  | 42  |  | Vice President, Technical Sales and Business Development                 
|                            |  |     |  |                                                                          
|Patricio X. Muirragui       |  | 53  |  | Vice President, Quality                                                  
|                            |  |     |  |                                                                          
|Terry L. Williams           |  | 41  |  | Chief Technical Officer                                                  

(1) Member of Audit Committee

(2) Member of Compensation Committee

Glenn A. Ehley has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since August 2001 and as a director of the Company since January 2002. Prior to August 2001, he served as Senior Vice
President of Worldwide Sales and Marketing beginning February 2000 and from August 1997 until February 2000 as Vice President of Sales and Marketing. Mr. Ehley joined the Company in July 1995 as Director of Marketing. Prior to joining the
Company, Mr. Ehley served in several positions at Siemens and Lucent Bell Laboratories in the Marketing and Engineering organizations. Mr. Ehley received an M.B.A. and M.S. in Computer Engineering from Florida Atlantic University and
received a B.S. in Computer Science from Illinois Benedictine College.

24



---

##### Table of Contents

James W. Brown has served as a director since November 1997 and as Chairman of the Board since October 1999. He serves as the designee of SCP Private Equity
Partners II, LP, one of the Companys stockholders. Mr. Brown has been a Partner, since 1996, of SCP Private Equity Management, LP and its successors, which manage private equity investment funds. Mr. Brown has also been a Managing
Director of CIP Capital Management, Inc. since 1994. From 1989 until 1994, Mr. Brown was Chief of Staff to the Governor of Pennsylvania. Prior to his public service, he was a partner in a major Philadelphia law firm. Mr. Brown received a
J.D. from the University of Virginia and a B.A. from Villanova Universitys Honors Program.

Darrell Lance Maynard has served as a director of the Company since January
2002. Since 1996, he has been the President and Chairman of Southeast Telephone (SET), of which he was a founder, in Pikeville, Kentucky. SET is a telecommunications provider of long distance, local service, Internet service and paging.
Mr. Maynard was selected as the SBA 2002 Small Business Person of the Year for the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Mr. Maynard attended Michigan Technological University in Houghton, Michigan.

George M. Calhoun has served as a director of the Company since March 2002. He was Chairman and CEO of Illinois Superconductor Corporation (Nasdaq: ISCO) from 1999 until 2002. He has more than 23 years of experience in
high-tech wireless systems development, beginning in 1980 as the co-founder of InterDigital Communications Corporation (Nasdaq: IDCC), where he participated in the development of the first commercial application of digital TDMA radio technology, and
introduced the first wireless local loop system to the North American telecommunications industry. Dr. Calhoun was a Director and Vice-Chairman of Geotek (which filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code in 1998),
and served as the Chairman of the companys engineering joint venture in Israel, PowerSpectrum Technologies, Ltd. until 1998. In 1998, Dr. Calhoun founded Davinci Solutions, LLC, a consulting firm focused on wireless and Internet
technology companies. Dr. Calhoun holds a Ph.D. in Systems Science from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, as well as a B.A. from the same university.

Joseph F. Gerrity has served as Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer since June 2001. Prior to June 2001, he served as Director of Strategic Planning beginning 1999. Prior to 1999, Mr. Gerrity served with Harris
Corporation, most recently as Controller of the Military and Space Division of Harris Semiconductor. Mr. Gerrity also served as CFO of COREdata. Mr. Gerrity holds an M.S. in Management from the University of Wisconsin and a B.S. in
Management from Marquette.

Stuart P. Dawley has served as Vice President, General Counsel, Investor Relations Officer and Secretary since September 2001. Prior to that, he was
General Counsel to the Company between July 2000 and September 2001. Prior to that, he served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel at Exigent International, Inc. from July 1997 until April 2000. Before joining Exigent, Mr. Dawley was
General Counsel of AirNet from November 1996 until July 1997 and served as Director of Marketing and Strategic Alliances from June 1995 until November 1996. Mr. Dawley received his Juris Doctor Degree from the University of Iowa.

Timothy J. Mahar has served as Vice President of Worldwide Sales since August 2001. Prior to that, he served as Vice President of Marketing and Business Development from February 2000 to
August 2001. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Mahar served in several sales and marketing management positions at Siemens Information and Communications Networks since 1992. From October 1998 to February 2000 he served as Vice President of
Sales and Business Development and from October 1997 to October 1998 as Vice President of Business Solutions. Mr. Mahar holds an M.S. in Electrical Engineering and a B.S. in Computer Engineering from the University of Wisconsin 
Milwaukee.

Thomas R. Schmutz has served as Vice President of Engineering since August 2001. Prior to being elected as Vice President of Engineering, he served as the
Companys Director of Engineering beginning in 1995. Mr. Schmutz holds a MS in Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a BS from the United States Military Academy. He holds thirteen U.S. patents in the wireless technology
field.

William J. Lee has served as Vice President of Operations since October 1999. Prior to that, he served as the Companys Vice President of Services beginning October
1999. Mr. Lee joined the Company in June 1999 as Director of Services. From January 1985 to June 1999, Mr. Lee served in several capacities with Siemens Information and Communications Networks, most recently as Director of Systems
Integrations Services. Prior to joining Siemens, Mr. Lee was a Lecturer at the Midwest College of Engineering in Northern Illinois and held various positions with AT&T Network Systems. Mr. Lee holds a B.S. in Computer Science from
Northern Illinois University.

Patricio X. Muirragui has served as Vice President of Quality since January 2001. Prior to January 2001, for more than 24 years Mr. Muirragui
several capacities with Siemens Information and Communications Networks, most recently as Director of Quality. Prior to joining Siemens in 1976, Mr. Muirragui held various positions, as a Member of the Technical Staff, at Bell Laboratories.
Mr. Muirragui holds a BSEE from Purdue University and a MSEE from the University of California, Berkeley.

Bennet Wong has served as Vice President of Technical Sales &
Business Development since August 2001. Prior to August 2001, Mr. Wong held several positions in marketing and technical sales for the Company beginning in September 1998. Prior to September 1998, Mr. Wong was employed by Ericsson
Communications of Canada where he was a Product Manager for approximately four years. He holds an MSEE and BSEE from Ohio State University.

Terry L. Williams has served the
Chief Technical Officer since August 2001 having joined the Company as its co-founder in 1994. Prior to that, he served at Harris Corporation and GE Aerospace on numerous government/commercial projects focusing on communications, signal processing
and advanced radar technology. Mr. Williams is the architect of the Companys broadband SDR radio and holds eleven U.S. patents in the wireless field. Mr. Williams holds an MSEE from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. from
Mississippi State University.

25



---

##### Table of Contents

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Based solely on our
review of copies of reports filed by persons (reporting persons) required to file such reports pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, we believe that all filings required to be made by reporting persons with respect to the year
ended December 31, 2002 were timely made in accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, except that the Form 3 for Mr. Calhoun reporting his appointment by our board of directors that was inadvertently filed late.

ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following summary
compensation table sets forth information concerning compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to (i) our Chief Executive Officer, and (ii) the four highest compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers at December 31,
2002, (collectively, the named executive officers) for services rendered in all capacities with respect to the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002:



|                                    |  | ANNUAL COMPENSATION |  | LONG-TERM COMPENSATION AWARDS(1) | 
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | 
|                                    |  |                     |  |                                  | 
|NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION         |  | FISCALYEAR          |  | SALARY($)                        | 
|                                    |  |                     |  |                                  | 
|                                    |  |                     |  |                                  | 
|Glenn A. Ehley                      |  | 2002                |  | 250,000                          | 
|President, Chief Executive          |  | 2001                |  | 187,090                          | 
|Officer and Director                |  | 2000                |  | 139,554                          | 
|William J. Lee                      |  | 2002                |  | 183,900                          | 
|Vice President of Operations        |  | 2001                |  | 183,058                          | 
|                                    |  | 2000                |  | 160,908                          | 
|Thomas R. Schmutz                   |  | 2002                |  | 183,644                          | 
|Vice President of Engineering       |  | 2001                |  | 156,641                          | 
|                                    |  | 2000                |  | 131,100                          | 
|Joseph F. Gerrity                   |  | 2002                |  | 178,750                          | 
|Chief Financial Officer             |  | 2001                |  | 140,395                          | 
|                                    |  | 2000                |  | 88,462                           | 
|Bennet Wong                         |  | 2002                |  | 157,300                          | 
|Vice President of Technical Sales & |  | 2001                |  | 146,405                          | 
|Business Development                |  | 2000                |  | 109,380                          | 

(1)Figures in this column show the number of options to purchase shares of our common stock that were granted during the respective fiscal
year, notwithstanding the fact that the options may have been granted for services performed in a prior fiscal year. We did not grant any restricted stock awards or stock appreciation rights to any of the named executive officers during the years
shown.

(2)Represents
performance-based sales bonuses, premiums paid for life insurance policy, and legal fees paid for personal representation.

(3)Represents performance-based sales bonuses.

(4)Represents a matching contribution to a defined contribution plan.

OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR

The following table sets forth information concerning individual grants of stock options to the named
executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002:

|NAME             |                                            | INDIVIDUAL GRANTS |                                                       | EXERCISEORBASEPRICE($/SH) |   | EXPIRATIONDATE |          | POTENTIAL REALIZABLEVALUEAT ASSUMED
ANNUALRATES OF STOCK PRICEAPPRECIATIONFOR OPTION TERM(1) |          
|---------------- | ------------------------------------------ | ----------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | - | -------------- | -------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------
|                 |                                            |                   |                                                       |                           |   |               
|                 | SECURITIESUNDERLYINGOPTION/SARSGRANTED (#) |                   | %OF TOTALOPTIONSGRANTED TOEMPLOYEES INFISCALYEAR 2002 |                           |   |                | 5%($)(2) |                                                                                              | 10%($)(2)
|                 |                                            |                   |                                                       |                           |   |                |          |                                                                                              |          
|Timothy J. Mahar |                                            | 15,000            |                                                       | 11.5                      | % | $              | 0.61     |                                                                                              |          
|                 |                                            |                   |                                                       |                           |   |                |          |                                                                                              |          

(1)Options vest in three installments over a two-year period. The options in this table expire ten years after grant.

(2)These columns show the hypothetical value of the options granted at the end of the option terms if the price of
our common stock were to appreciate annually by 5% and 10%, respectively, based on the grant date value of our common stock.

26



---

##### Table of Contents

AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION VALUES

The following table sets forth certain information regarding stock option exercises by the named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and stock options held by the named executive officers at December 31, 2002:

|NAME              |  | SHARESACQUIREDON
EXERCISE(#) |                | VALUEREALIZED($)(1) |                  | NO. OF SECURITIESUNDERLYING UNEXERCISEDOPTIONS HELD ATFISCAL YEAR-END |                | VALUE OF UNEXERCISED,IN-THE-MONEY OPTIONS ATFISCAL YEAR-END(2) |                 
|----------------- |  | ---------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------- | ---------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------
|                  |  |                              |                |                     |                  |                                                                      
|                  |  |                              | EXERCISABLE(#) |                     | UNEXERCISABLE(#) |                                                                       | EXERCISABLE($) |                                                                | UNEXERCISABLE($)
|                  |  |                              |                |                     |                  |                                                                       |                |                                                                |                 
|Glenn A. Ehley    |  | 10,869                       |                | $                   | 28,086           |                                                                       | 241,024        |                                                                | 106,331         
|William J. Lee    |  |                             |                | $                   |                 |                                                                       | 97,494         |                                                                | 66,331          
|Thomas R. Schmutz |  | 317                          |                | $                   | 299              |                                                                       | 55,414         |                                                                | 28,149          
|Joseph F. Gerrity |  |                             |                | $                   |                 |                                                                       | 40,465         |                                                                | 17,110          
|Bennet Wong       |  |                             |                | $                   |                 |                                                                       | 41,179         |                                                                | 19,673          

(1)Calculated based on the fair market value of our common stock on the date of exercise minus the exercise price, multiplied by the number
of shares issued upon exercise of the options.

(2)Calculated by determining the difference between the exercise price of the options and $0.52, the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2002.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

We modified our policy on the compensation of directors retroactive to January 1, 2002. We compensate all
outside, independent directors (currently Mr. Maynard and Mr. Calhoun) $1,000.00 for attendance at each meeting of our Board of Directors and any committee meetings. In addition, non-employee, non-affiliated directors are entitled to
receive option grants and awards under our 1999 Equity Incentive Plan. All directors will be reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board of Directors and its committees.

EMPLOYMENT AND OTHER COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS

During August 2001, we entered into an employment agreement with Glenn A. Ehley, President
and Chief Executive Officer, that contains change of control and severance provisions. Should Mr. Ehley be terminated without cause (as defined in the employment agreement), the agreement provides for special severance (twelve
months of pay) plus benefits payable in a lump sum within three days after termination and accelerated vesting of stock options that would have vested within two years after termination. In addition, Mr. Ehley has the right to participate in
the Acquisition Bonus Program adopted by the Board of Directors on August 24, 2001 to compensate employees in the event of a change in control of the Company. This program gives the CEO the authority to set aside a certain percentage of the net
proceeds associated with an acquisition or merger constituting a change in control of the Company. The percentage varies depending on the amount of the proceeds. The CEO would then allocate this pool to all employees in his discretion.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

No interlocking relationship exists between the
Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee and the board of directors or compensation committee of any other company, nor has any such interlocking relationship existed in the past. During the year ended December 31, 2002, Mr. Brown
served as a member of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Brown is affiliated with SCP Private Equity Partners, L.P. (SCP) which holds more than 5% of the outstanding and issued shares of our common stock acquired in the following
financings:

1999 BRIDGE FINANCING

In early June 1999, we closed on loans in an aggregate amount
of $800,000 from certain existing stockholders or related affiliates. The loans were evidenced by demand promissory notes and accrued interest at the prime rate plus 2% per annum. The demand notes were canceled and exchanged for convertible
promissory notes as part of the initial closing of our convertible promissory notes and warrant offering. SCP, an affiliate of Mr. Brown, who serves as a director and Chairman of the Board, participated in this financing in an amount of
$200,000.

In mid-June 1999, we closed on $6.0 million of convertible promissory notes along with warrants to purchase approximately 490,663 shares of our common stock. In July
and August 1999, we closed on an additional $338,187 of convertible promissory notes along with warrants to purchase approximately 27,656 shares of our common stock. Currently as a result of the 1999 bridge financing, there are warrants outstanding
to purchase a total of 456,945 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $3.49 per share. The number of shares underlying the warrants and the exercise price per share were adjusted in May 2001 pursuant to the anti-dilution rights of the
warrant holders. Among the purchasers of the convertible promissory notes and warrants was SCP ($2,500,000). The principal and accrued interest under the outstanding convertible promissory notes totaling $6,485,985 were automatically converted into
shares of our Series G preferred stock upon the closing of the Series G financing.

27



---

##### Table of Contents

REDEEMABLE, CONVERTIBLE SERIES B PREFERRED FINANCING

On May 16, 2001, we
issued 955,414 shares of preferred stock to three existing stockholders, SCP II, Tandem and Mellon, at $31.40 per share for a total face value of $30 million. The preferred stock is redeemable at any time after May 31, 2006 out of funds legally
available for such purposes. Dividends accrue to the preferred stockholders, whether or not declared, at 8% cumulatively per annum and are included in the carrying value of the Series B Preferred Stock. Initially, each share of preferred stock was
convertible, at any time, into ten shares of common stock. Holders of preferred stock are entitled to votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which each preferred stockholding converts and collectively the right to designate two
members of the Board of Directors. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the company, the preferred stockholders are entitled to 200% of their initial purchase price plus accrued but unpaid dividends before any payments to
any other stockholders. In association with this preferred stock investment, we issued immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 2,866,242 shares of our common stock for $3.14 per share, which expire on May 14, 2011. Effective October 31, 2002,
the preferred stockholders irrevocably and permanently waived the right of optional redemption applicable to the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock as set forth in the Certificate of Designation and the right to treat a specific proposed
Sale of the Corporation as a Liquidation Event, to the extent that such treatment would entitle the preferred stockholders to receive their Liquidation Amount per share in a form different from the consideration
to be paid to holders of our common stock in connection with such Sale of the Corporation. This waiver allowed us to classify the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock as a part of our stockholders equity.

2003 BRIDGE FINANCING

On January 24, 2003, we entered into a Bridge Loan Agreement with SCP II and TECORE. We issued two
Bridge Notes under the Bridge Loan Agreement, each in a principal amount of $3 million. The Bridge Notes carry an interest rate of two percent over the prime rate published inThe Wall Street Journaland become due and payable on May 24, 2003. The Bridge Loan Agreement provides that the Bridge Notes are secured by a security interest in all of our assets including, without limitation, our intellectual property. As of March 28, 2003, we have
received advances totaling $4.8 million under the Bridge Notes. We are currently negotiating a definitive funding agreement, under which SCP II and TECORE would provide us financing of $16 million in the form of secured notes convertible into our
common stock. The proceeds of this proposed financing would be used to refund the advances under the Bridge Loan Agreement and to fund our operations.

As a condition of the
issuance of the Bridge Notes on January 24, 2003 to SCP II and TECORE and subject to the closing of the proposed financing, each of our preferred stockholders agreed to convert their shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into 6,369,427
shares of our common stock at a conversion ratio of 1:20, waive their right to receive accumulated but unpaid dividends on the preferred stock, and to cancel their warrants to purchase shares of our common stock in exchange for $500,000. SCP II has
committed to taking additional shares of our common stock in lieu of receiving $500,000 in cash. Mellon and Tandem entered into a Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 24, 2003, pursuant to which Mellon will purchase all of the outstanding
shares of our common stock that Tandem holds for $500,000.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the ownership of our common stock, of which 23,851,177 shares were outstanding as of February 3, 2003, and preferred stock, of which 955,414 shares were
outstanding as of February 3, 2003, by (i) persons known by us to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of its common stock and more than 5% of the preferred stock, (ii) our directors, (iii) the named executive officers, and (iv) all executive
officers and directors as of February 3, 2003 as a group:



|                                |  | SHARES OF COMMON STOCKBENEFICIALLY OWNED(1) |     | SHARES OF SERIES BCONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCKBENEFICIALLY OWNED(1) (13) |  
|------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | -
|                                |  |                                             |     |                                                                         |  
|                                |  | SHARES                                      |     | PERCENT                                                                 |  
|                                |  |                                             |     |                                                                         |  
|SCP Private Equity Partners, LP |  | 7,962,601                                   | (2) | 28.2                                                                    | %
|800 The Safeguard Building      |  |                                             |     |                                                                         |  
|435 Devon Park Drive            |  |                                             |     |                                                                         |  
|Wayne, PA 19087                 |  |                                             |     |                                                                         |  
|Tandem PCS Investments, L.P     |  | 6,457,583                                   | (3) | 22.9                                                                    | %
|c/o Capital Communications CDPQ |  |                                             |     |                                                                         |  
|1981 McGill College Avenue      |  |                                             |     |                                                                         |  
|Montreal, Quebec                |  |                                             |     |                                                                         |  
|H3A 3C7, Canada                 |  |                                             |     |                                                                         |  
|Mellon Ventures, L.P.           |  | 4,618,442                                   | (4) | 16.5                                                                    | %
|One Mellon Center, Room 5300    |  |                                             |     |                                                                         |  
|Pittsburgh, PA 15258            |  |                                             |     |                                                                         |  
|VFC Capital, Inc.               |  | 3,445,687                                   | (5) | 14.4                                                                    | %
|c/o Harris Corporation          |  |                                             |     |                                                                         |  
|1025 West NASA Boulevard        |  |                                             |     |                                                                         |  
|Melbourne, FL 32919             |  |                                             |     |                                                                         |  
|James W. Brown.                 |  | 7,970,134                                   | (6) | 28.3                                                                    | %
|Darrell Lance Maynard           |  | 4,009                                       |     | *                                                                       |  
|George M. Calhoun               |  | 4,492                                       |     | *                                                                       |  

28



---

##### Table of Contents



|Glenn A. Ehley.                                              |  | 324,525   | (7)  | 1.4  | % |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------- | ---- | ---- | - |  |  |  | 
|William J. Lee.                                              |  | 111,994   | (8)  | *    |   |  |  |  | 
|Thomas R. Schmutz.                                           |  | 76,442    | (9)  | *    |   |  |  |  | 
|Joseph F. Gerrity.                                           |  | 42,199    | (10) | *    |   |  |  |  | 
|Bennet Wong                                                  |  | 45,298    | (11) | *    |   |  |  |  | 
|All executive officers and directors as a group (12 persons) |  | 8,828,584 | (12) | 27.0 | % |  |  |  | 

*Indicates less than 1%

(1)Unless otherwise indicated, each beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares listed in the table.

(2)As reported in the Schedule 13D (the SCP Schedule 13D) filed
5/25/2001 on behalf of SCP Private Equity Partners II, L.P. (SCP II), or otherwise, of this amount 318,471.33 shares of Preferred Stock, which, for voting purposes, is
convertible at a conversion price of $3.14 into 3,184,713 shares of Common Stock, and 955,414 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of a warrant are beneficially held by SCP II, 3,437,687 shares of Common Stock and 214,988 shares of Common
Stock issuable upon exercise of a warrant (adjusted from 204,443 shares upon the sale of Series B Preferred Stock) are beneficially held by SCP Private Equity Partners, L.P. (SCP) and 169,799 shares of Common Stock are beneficially held
by CIP Capital L.P. (CIP).

(3)As reported
in the Schedule 13D filed 6/20/2001 on behalf of Tandem PCS Investments, L.P. (Tandem), or otherwise, of this amount 2,145,465 shares of Common Stock and 318,471.33 shares of
Preferred Stock, which for voting purposes, is convertible at a conversion price of $3.14 into 3,184,713 shares of Common Stock, are beneficially held by Tandem, and 1,127,405 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of warrants (171,991 shares
of which were adjusted from 163,555 shares upon the sale of Series B Preferred Stock) are beneficially held by Tandem.

(4)As reported in the Schedule 13D filed 5/29/2001 on behalf of Mellon Ventures, L.P., (Mellon), or otherwise,
of this amount 478,315 shares of Common Stock and 318,471.33 shares of Preferred Stock which, for voting purposes, is convertible at a conversion price of $3.14 into 3,184,713 shares of Common Stock, are beneficially held by Mellon, and 955,414
shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of warrants are beneficially held by Mellon.

(5)As reported in the Schedule 13G/A filed 2/10/2003 on behalf of Harris Corporation, and VFC Capital, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Harris, of this amount 3,401,828 shares of Common Stock and 43,859 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of a warrant (43,859 shares were adjusted from 41,707 shares upon the sale of Series B Preferred Stock) are beneficially
held by VFC Capital, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Harris Corporation.

(6)As reported in the SCP Schedule 13D, or otherwise, of this amount 318,471.33 shares of Preferred Stock, which, for voting purposes, is convertible into 3,184,713 shares of Common
Stock, and 955,414 shares issuable upon exercise of a warrant and beneficially held by SCP II, 3,437,687 shares of Common Stock and 214,988 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of a warrant (adjusted from 204,443 shares upon the sale of
Series B Preferred Stock) are beneficially held by CIP. Mr. Brown is affiliated with each of SCP, SCP II and CIP. Includes an option to purchase Common Stock held by Mr. Brown exercisable immediately for 7,533 shares.

(7)Includes 52,170 shares held by Mr. Ehley and options
exercisable immediately for 253,524 shares and options exercisable within sixty days for 18,831 shares.

(8)Includes 2,000 shares held by Mr. Lee and options exercisable immediately for 109,994 shares.

(9)Includes 14,562 shares held by Mr. Schmutz and options exercisable immediately for 57,914 shares and options exercisable within
sixty days for 3,966 shares.

(10)Includes 1000 shares held by
Mr. Gerrity and options exercisable immediately for 41,199 shares.

(11)Includes 2,627 shares held by Mr. Wong and options exercisable immediately for 42,671 shares.

(12)The executive officers and directors of the Company as a group consist of Glenn A. Ehley, Stuart P. Dawley, Joseph F. Gerrity, William J. Lee,
Timothy J. Mahar, Patricio X. Muirragui, Thomas R. Schmutz, Terry L. Williams, Bennett Wong, James W. Brown, Darrell Lance Maynard, and Dr. George M. Calhoun.

(13)For additional information and further description of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, see Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions below. Unless otherwise indicated, each beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares listed in the table. The Series B convertible preferred stock is convertible immediately into common stock at
the current conversion price as that term is defined in the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation.

29



---

##### Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION



|Plan category                                              |  | Number of securitiesto be issued uponexercise
ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights(a) |  | Weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights(b) |      | Number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans (excludingsecurities reflected incolumn (a))(c) |          
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------
|                                                           |  |                                                                                            |  |                                                                             |      |                                                                                                                                          |          
|Equity compensation plans approved by security holders     |  | 2,394,586                                                                                  |  | $                                                                           | 4.85 |                                                                                                                                          | 1,504,667
|Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |  |                                                                                           |  | $                                                                           |     |                                                                                                                                          |         
|                                                           |  |                                                                                            |  |                                                                             |      |                                                                                                                                          |          
|Total                                                      |  | 2,394,586                                                                                  |  | $                                                                           | 4.85 |                                                                                                                                          | 1,504,667
|                                                           |  |                                                                                            |  |                                                                             |      |                                                                                                                                          |          

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Pursuant to a consulting agreement with us, Mr. Ehleys father-in-law, Richard Blake, provides consulting services with respect to evolving telecommunications standards and business development opportunities in the military, public
safety, law enforcement and government sectors. The agreement provides for a payment not to exceed $5,000 per month, exclusive of expenses, and is terminable at will by either party with thirty days notice.

On November 9, 2000, the Company loaned a former officer of the Company, Dr. R. Lee Hamilton, Jr., $112,660, payable in full on November 9, 2005 at 6.01% interest, payable semiannually. The loan
was made to reimburse Dr. Hamilton, when he was an officer, for an amount paid by him to exercise an option to purchase 113,274 shares of the Companys common stock in February 2000 and is accordingly classified in stockholders
equity. The note is collateralized by the underlying value of the stock and the Company has full recourse against Dr. Hamilton in the event of a default. The unpaid principal amount of the note, which is classified as a deduction from
stockholders equity together with all accrued and unpaid interest and any other sums owing under the note, are payable on November 9, 2005, the fifth anniversary of the date of the note. Interest was payable on November 9, 2001 and
semi-annually thereafter. As of December 31, 2001 this note was in default and therefore the payment of principal and interest was due in full. A portion of the collateral stock was sold in the first quarter of 2002 and the proceeds of $41,503,
including interest income of $6,534 and prepaid interest of $27,339 were transmitted to the Company on April 15, 2002 bringing payments on the note current. The Company continues to pursue collection of the note. The Company feels, given the full
recourse on the note, that the funds held in a brokerage account, subject to an account control agreement, and the prepaid interest on the note provide adequate protection against default.

On March 14, 2001, the Company loaned Dr. Hamilton, $995,133 at an interest rate of 5.07% per annum secured by his pledge of stock under an Account Control Agreement dated as of March 14, 2001 among
Dr. Hamilton, Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. and the Company. The principal represents the amount that the Company loaned to Dr. Hamilton to satisfy the alternative minimum tax liability incurred in connection with his exercise of options in
February 2000. The unpaid principal amount of the note, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and any other sums owing under the note, is payable on March 14, 2006, the fifth anniversary of the date of the note. As of the date of this
report, the entire principal amount of the note is outstanding. An allowance of $995,133 was recorded during 2001 for the estimated loss on this loan. The Company is not accruing any interest associated with this note.

On March 16, 2001, the Company loaned Mr. Ehley $221,977 at an interest rate of 5.07% per annum. The note is secured by the pledge of the officers stock under an Account Control Agreement
dated as of March 16, 2001 among Mr. Ehley, Salomon Smith Barney Inc. and the Company. The principal represents the amount the Company loaned to the officer to satisfy the alternative minimum tax liability incurred in connection with his
exercise of options to purchase 25,261 shares of Common Stock in March 2000. The unpaid principal amount of the note, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and any other sums owing under the note, is payable on March 16, 2006, the fifth
anniversary of the date of the note. As of the date of this report, the entire principal amount and accrued interest of the note is outstanding however, it is not due. The note was valued at a market rate of interest (9%) and accordingly a discount
of $43,040 was recorded against the note. The Company is not recognizing any interest income associated with this note.

In early June 1999, we closed on loans in an aggregate
amount of $800,000 from certain existing stockholders or related affiliates. The loans were evidenced by demand promissory notes and accrued interest at the prime rate plus 2% per annum. The demand notes were canceled and exchanged for convertible
promissory notes as part of the initial closing of our convertible promissory notes and warrant offering. SCP, an affiliate of Mr. Brown, who serves as a director and Chairman of the Board, participated in this financing in an amount of
$200,000.

In mid-June 1999, we closed on $6.0 million of convertible promissory notes along with warrants to purchase approximately 490,663 shares of our common stock. In July
and August 1999, we closed on an additional $338,187 of convertible promissory notes along with warrants to purchase approximately 27,656 shares of our common stock. Currently as a result of the 1999 bridge financing, there are warrants outstanding
to purchase a total of 456,945 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $3.49 per share. The number of shares underlying the warrants and the exercise price per share were adjusted in May 2001 pursuant to the anti-dilution rights of the
warrant holders. Among the purchasers of the convertible promissory notes and warrants was SCP ($2,500,000). The principal and accrued interest under the outstanding convertible

30



---

##### Table of Contents

promissory notes totaling $6,485,985 were automatically converted into shares of our Series G preferred stock upon the closing of the Series G financing.

On May 16, 2001, we issued 955,414 shares of preferred stock to three existing stockholders, SCP II, Tandem and Mellon, at $31.40 per share for a total face value of $30
million. The preferred stock is redeemable at any time after May 31, 2006 out of funds legally available for such purposes. Dividends accrue to the preferred stockholders, whether or not declared, at 8% cumulatively per annum. Initially, each share
of preferred stock was convertible, at any time, into ten shares of common stock. Holders of preferred stock are entitled to votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which each preferred stockholding converts and collectively the
right to designate two members of the Board of Directors. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the company, the preferred stockholders are entitled to 200% of their initial purchase price plus accrued but unpaid dividends
before any payments to any other stockholders. In association with this preferred stock investment, we issued immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 2,866,242 shares of our common stock for $3.14 per share, which expire on May 14, 2011.
Effective October 31, 2002, the preferred stockholders irrevocably and permanently waived the right of optional redemption applicable to the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock as set forth in the Certificate of Designation and the right to treat a
specific proposed Sale of the Corporation as a Liquidation Event, to the extent that such treatment would entitle the preferred stockholders to receive their Liquidation Amount per share in a form different from
the consideration to be paid to holders of our common stock in connection with such Sale of the Corporation. This waiver allowed us to classify the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock as a part of our stockholders equity.

On January 24, 2003, we entered into a Bridge Loan Agreement with SCP II and TECORE. We issued two Bridge Notes under the Bridge Loan Agreement, each in a principal amount of $3 million. The
Bridge Notes carry an interest rate of two percent over the prime rate published inThe Wall Street Journaland become due and payable on May 24, 2003. The Bridge Loan Agreement provides that the Bridge
Notes are secured by a security interest in all of our assets including, without limitation, our intellectual property. To date, we have received advances totaling $4.8 million under the Bridge Notes. We are currently negotiating a definitive
funding agreement, under which SCP II and TECORE would provide us financing of $16 million in the form of secured notes convertible into our common stock. The proceeds of this proposed financing would be used to refund the advances under the Bridge
Loan Agreement and to fund our operations. As a condition of the issuance of the Bridge Notes on January 24, 2003 to SCP II and TECORE, each of our preferred stockholders agreed to convert their shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into
6,369,427 shares of our common stock at a conversion ratio of 1:20, waive their right to receive accumulated but unpaid dividends on the preferred stock, and cancel their warrants to purchase shares of our common stock in exchange for $500,000. SCP
II has committed to taking additional shares of our common stock in lieu of receiving $500,000 in cash. Mellon and Tandem entered into a Stock Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 24, 2003, pursuant to which Mellon will purchase all of the
outstanding shares of our common stock that Tandem holds for $500,000.

ITEM 14.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain a set of
disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed by us under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act) is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Within the 90 days prior to the date of this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act.
Based on that evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are alerting them in a timely manner to material information required
to be included in our periodic reports. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals
under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect
those controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, nor were any corrective actions required with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

PART IV

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

a. We have filed the following documents as part of this report, except as otherwise noted:

1. Financial Statements

See Index to Financial Statements on page F-1 of this report.

2. Financial Statement Schedules Financial
Statement Schedules have been omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they would be required or because the required information has been included in the financial statements.

3. Exhibits



|3.1(4) | Seventh Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
|------ | ----------------------------------------------------------
|       |                                                           
|3.2(1) | Second Amended and Restated Bylaws.                       
|       |                                                           
|3.3(2) | Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Bylaws.          

31



---

##### Table of Contents



|3.4 (5)    | Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.                                                                                                                          
|---------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|3.5 (8)    | Certificate of Designation of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock.                                                                                                                                   
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|3.6 (11)   | Consent and Waiver of Holders of Series B Preferred Stock dated October 31, 2002.                                                                                                                     
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.1(1)     | Specimen Certificate evidencing shares of Common Stock.                                                                                                                                               
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.2(1)     | Second Amended and Restated Shareholders and Registration Rights Agreement dated as of April 16, 1997.                                                                                               
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.3(1)     | First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Shareholders and Registration Rights Agreement dated as of September 20, 1999.                                                                        
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.4(1)     | Second Amended and Restated Agreement Among Series E, Series F and Series G Second Amended and Restated Preferred Stockholders and Senior
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of September 7, 1999.
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.5(1)     | First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement Among Series E, Series F and Series G Preferred Stockholders and Senior Registration
Rights Agreement dated as of September 20, 1999.        
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.6(6)     | Rights Agreement dated January 9, 2001 between AirNet Communications Corporation and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company.                                                                      
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.7(6)     | Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of AirNet Communications Corporation.                                                                                     
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.1(1)    | AirNet Communications Corporation 1999 Equity Incentive Plan.                                                                                                                                         
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.2(1)    | OEM and Patent License Option Agreement dated January 27, 1995 between Motorola, Inc. and AirNet Communications Corporation.                                                                          
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.3(1)    | Employee Noncompete and Post-Termination Benefits Agreement dated October 26, 1999 between AirNet Communications Corporation and R. Lee
Hamilton, Jr.                                                 
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.4(3)    | Amendment to Incentive Stock Option Agreements dated February 11, 2000 between AirNet Communications Corporation and William J. Lee.                                                                  
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.5(3)    | Amendment to Incentive Stock Option Agreements dated February 11, 2000 between AirNet Communications Corporation and Glenn A. Ehley.                                                                  
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.6(3)    | Amendment to Incentive Stock Option Agreements dated February 11, 2000 between AirNet Communications Corporation and Timothy Mahar.                                                                   
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.7 (3)   | Employment Agreement dated August 17, 2001 between AirNet Communications Corporation and Glenn A. Ehley                                                                                               
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.8(5)    | First Amendment To 1999 Equity Incentive Plan of Airnet Communications Corporation.                                                                                                                   
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.9(7)    | Account Control Agreement among R. Lee Hamilton, Jr., Salomon Smith Barney Inc. and AirNet Communications Corporation dated as of October 2,
2000.                                                    
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.10(7)   | Promissory Note dated November 9, 2000 in the amount of $112,600.00 made by R. Lee Hamilton, Jr. in favor of AirNet Communications
Corporation.                                                       
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.11(7)   | Agreement to Loan Funds dated as of December 22, 2000 by and between AirNet Communications Corporation and R. Lee Hamilton, Jr.                                                                       
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.12(7)   | Agreement to Loan Funds dated as of December 22, 2000 by and between AirNet Communications Corporation and Glenn Ehley.                                                                               
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.13(7)   | Non-Recourse Promissory Note dated March 14, 2001 in the amount of $995,133.00 made by R. Lee Hamilton, Jr. in favor of AirNet Communications
Corporation.                                            
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.14(7)   | Non-Recourse Promissory Note dated March 16, 2001 in the amount of $221,997.00 made by Glenn Ehley in favor of AirNet Communications
Corporation.                                                     
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.15(7)   | Account Control Agreement among Glenn Ehley, Salomon Smith Barney Inc. and AirNet Communications Corporation                                                                                          
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.16(7)   | Security Agreement dated as of November 15, 2001 between AirNet Communications Corporation and Force Computers, Inc., Sanmina Corporation and
Brooktrout, Inc.                                        
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.17(8)   | Form of Indemnity Agreement between AirNet Communications Corporation and each of its directors and officers.                                                                                         
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.18(8)   | Employment, Severance, and Bonus Agreement dated August 13, 2002 between AirNet Communications Corporation and Glenn A. Ehley.                                                                        
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.19(8)   | Amended and Restated Management and Employee Acquisition Bonus Program effective August 12, 2002.                                                                                                     
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.20 (12) | Bridge Loan Agreement dated January 24, 2003 by and among AirNet Communications Corporation, TECORE, Inc. and SCP Private Equity Partners II,
L.P.                                                    
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.21 (12) | Bridge Loan Promissory Note in favor of SCP Private Equity Partners II, L.P. for $3,000,000 dated January 24, 2003.                                                                                   
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.22 (12) | Bridge Loan Promissory Note in favor of TECORE, Inc. for $3,000,000 dated January 24, 2003.                                                                                                           
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.23 (12) | Security Agreement dated January 24, 2003 by and among AirNet Communications Corporation, TECORE, Inc. and SCP Private Equity Partners II,
L.P.                                                       
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.24 (12) | Terms Sheet dated January 24, 2003 among AirNet Communications Corporation, SCP Private Equity Partners II, L.P. and TECORE, Inc.                                                                     
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.25 (12) | Notice of Election to Convert from SCP Private Equity Partners II, L.P. to AirNet Communications Corporation dated January 20, 2003(with letter
to escrow agent attached).                            
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.26 (12) | Notice of Election to Convert from Mellon Ventures, L.P. to AirNet Communications Corporation dated January 20, 2003 (with letter to escrow
agent attached).                                          
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.27 (12) | Notice of Election to Convert from Tandem PCS Investments, L.P. to AirNet Communications Corporation dated January 20, 2003 (with                                                                     

32



---

##### Table of Contents



|           | letter to escrow agent attached).                                                                                                                                                                                           
|---------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|10.28 (12) | Escrow Agreement dated January 20, 2003 by and among AirNet Communications Corporation, Tandem PCS Investments, L.P., SCP Private Equity
Partners II, L.P., Mellon Ventures, L.P. and Edwards& Angell, LLP, as escrow agent.
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|10.29 (12) | Technology Collateral Escrow Agreement effective January 24, 2003 among DSI Technology Escrow Services, Inc., AirNet Communications
Corporation, TECORE, Inc. and SCP Private Equity Partners II, L.P.                      
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|10.30 (12) | Collateral Assignment of Patents, Trademarks & Copyrights dated January 24, 2003 by and among AirNet Communications Corporation, SCP
Private Equity Partners II, L.P. and TECORE, Inc.                                      
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|10.31 (13) | Terms Sheet dated March 25, 2003 among AirNet Communications Corporation, SCP Private Equity Partners II, L.P. and TECORE, Inc.                                                                                             
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|23.1       | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.                                                                                                                                                                                           

(1)Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement No. 333-87693 on Form S-1 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 24, 1999, as amended.

(2)Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2000.

(3)Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 15, 2000.

(4)Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2000.

(5)Incorporated by reference to Schedule 14A as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 7, 2000.

(6)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 17, 2001.

(7)Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3,
2001.

(8)Incorporated by reference
to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2001.

(9)Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2002.

(10)Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2002.

(11)Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2002.

(12)Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 28, 2003.

(13)Incorporated by reference to
Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2003.

b. Reports on Form 8-K

The Company filed Current Reports on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2002 reporting one item under Item 5, Other Events, and filing one exhibit under Item 7,
Exhibits and on January 28, 2003 reporting one event under Item 2, Acquisition or Disposition of Assets, one item under Item 5, Other Events, and filing twelve exhibits under Item 7, Exhibits, and on March 26, 2003 reporting one event under Item 2,
Acquisiton or Disposition of Assets, one item under Item 5, Other Events, and filing one exhibit under Item 7, Exhibits.

33



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report Filed on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



| |  | AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
| |  | ---------------------------------
| |  | By:                              
| |  |                                  
| |  |                                  

Date: May 15, 2003

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report
Filed on Form 10-K has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on May 15, 2003.

|                                                              |  |                                                                              | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                              |  |                                                                              | 
|/s/ GLENNA.EHLEY                                              |  | Director, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive
Officer) | 
|                                                              | 
|Glenn A. Ehley                                                | 
|                                                              |  |                                                                              | 
|/s/ JOSEPHF.GERRITY                                           |  | Vice President of Finance, Chief FinancialOfficer, and Treasurer             | 
|                                                              | 
|Joseph F. Gerrity(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer) | 



34



---

##### Table of Contents

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

I, Glenn A. Ehley, President and Chief Executive Officer of AirNet Communications Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of AirNet Communications Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and

c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not
there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses.



|                  |  |  |                                                    
|----------------- |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|Date:May 15, 2003 |  |  | /S/ GLENNA.EHLEY                                   
|                  |  |  |                                                    
|                  |  |  | Glenn A. EhleyPresident and Chief Executive Officer



35



---

##### Table of Contents

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph F. Gerrity, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AirNet Communications Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of AirNet Communications Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrants
other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and

c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not
there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses.



|                  |  |  |                                                                  
|----------------- |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:May 15, 2003 |  |  | /S/ JOSEPHF.GERRITY                                              
|                  |  |  |                                                                  
|                  |  |  | Joseph F. GerrityVice President of FinanceChief
Financial Officer



36



---

##### Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



|EXHIBITNUMBER | DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT                                                                                                                                                                               
|------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|3.1(4)        | Seventh Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.                                                                                                                                            
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|3.2(1)        | Second Amended and Restated Bylaws.                                                                                                                                                                   
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|3.3(2)        | Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Bylaws.                                                                                                                                                      
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|3.4 (5)       | Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.                                                                                                                          
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|3.5 (8)       | Certificate of Designation of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock.                                                                                                                                   
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|3.6 (11)      | Consent and Waiver of Holders of Series B Preferred Stock dated October 31, 2002.                                                                                                                     
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.1(1)        | Specimen Certificate evidencing shares of Common Stock.                                                                                                                                               
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.2(1)        | Second Amended and Restated Shareholders and Registration Rights Agreement dated as of April 16, 1997.                                                                                               
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.3(1)        | First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Shareholders and Registration Rights Agreement dated as of September 20, 1999.                                                                        
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.4(1)        | Second Amended and Restated Agreement Among Series E, Series F and Series G Second Amended and Restated Preferred Stockholders and Senior
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of September 7, 1999.
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.5(1)        | First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Agreement Among Series E, Series F and Series G Preferred Stockholders and Senior Registration
Rights Agreement dated as of September 20, 1999.        
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.6(6)        | Rights Agreement dated January 9, 2001 between AirNet Communications Corporation and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company.                                                                      
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|4.7(6)        | Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of AirNet Communications Corporation                                                                                      
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.1(1)       | AirNet Communications Corporation 1999 Equity Incentive Plan.                                                                                                                                         
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.2(1)       | OEM and Patent License Option Agreement dated January 27, 1995 between Motorola, Inc. and AirNet Communications Corporation.                                                                          
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.3(1)       | Employee Noncompete and Post-Termination Benefits Agreement dated October 26, 1999 between AirNet Communications Corporation and R. Lee
Hamilton, Jr.                                                 
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.4(3)       | Amendment to Incentive Stock Option Agreements dated February 11, 2000 between AirNet Communications Corporation and William J. Lee.                                                                  
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.5(3)       | Amendment to Incentive Stock Option Agreements dated February 11, 2000 between AirNet Communications Corporation and Glenn A. Ehley.                                                                  
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.6(3)       | Amendment to Incentive Stock Option Agreements dated February 11, 2000 between AirNet Communications Corporation and Timothy Mahar.                                                                   
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.7 (3)      | Employment Agreement dated August 17, 2001 between AirNet Communications Corporation and Glenn A. Ehley                                                                                               
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.8(5)       | First Amendment To 1999 Equity Incentive Plan of Airnet Communications Corporation.                                                                                                                   
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.9(7)       | Account Control Agreement among R. Lee Hamilton, Jr., Salomon Smith Barney Inc. and AirNet Communications Corporation dated as of October 2,
2000.                                                    
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.10(7)      | Promissory Note dated November 9, 2000 in the amount of $112,600.00 made by R. Lee Hamilton, Jr. in favor of AirNet Communications
Corporation.                                                       
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.11(7)      | Agreement to Loan Funds dated as of December 22, 2000 by and between AirNet Communications Corporation and R. Lee Hamilton, Jr.                                                                       
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.12(7)      | Agreement to Loan Funds dated as of December 22, 2000 by and between AirNet Communications Corporation and Glenn Ehley.                                                                               
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.13(7)      | Non-Recourse Promissory Note dated March 14, 2001 in the amount of $995,133.00 made by R. Lee Hamilton, Jr. in favor of AirNet Communications
Corporation.                                            
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.14(7)      | Non-Recourse Promissory Note dated March 16, 2001 in the amount of $221,997.00 made by Glenn Ehley in favor of AirNet Communications
Corporation.                                                     
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.15(7)      | Account Control Agreement among Glenn Ehley, Salomon Smith Barney Inc. and AirNet Communications Corporation                                                                                          
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.16(7)      | Security Agreement dated as of November 15, 2001 between AirNet Communications Corporation and Force Computers, Inc., Sanmina Corporation and
Brooktrout, Inc.                                        
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.17(8)      | Form of Indemnity Agreement between AirNet Communications Corporation and each of its directors and officers.                                                                                         
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.18(8)      | Employment, Severance, and Bonus Agreement dated August 13, 2002 between AirNet Communications Corporation and Glenn A. Ehley.                                                                        
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.19(8)      | Amended and Restated Management and Employee Acquisition Bonus Program effective August 12, 2002.                                                                                                     
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.20 (12)    | Bridge Loan Agreement dated January 24, 2003 by and among AirNet Communications Corporation, TECORE, Inc. and SCP Private Equity Partners II,
L.P.                                                    
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.21 (12)    | Bridge Loan Promissory Note in favor of SCP Private Equity Partners II, L.P. for $3,000,000 dated January 24, 2003.                                                                                   
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.22 (12)    | Bridge Loan Promissory Note in favor of TECORE, Inc. for $3,000,000 dated January 24, 2003.                                                                                                           
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.23 (12)    | Security Agreement dated January 24, 2003 by and among AirNet Communications Corporation, TECORE, Inc. and SCP Private Equity Partners II,
L.P.                                                       
|              |                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.24 (12)    | Terms Sheet dated January 24, 2003 among AirNet Communications Corporation, SCP Private Equity Partners II, L.P. and TECORE, Inc.                                                                     



---

##### Table of Contents



|10.25 (12) | Notice of Election to Convert from SCP Private Equity Partners II, L.P. to AirNet Communications Corporation dated January 20, 2003(with letter
to escrow agent attached).                                            
|---------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.26(12)  | Notice of Election to Convert from Mellon Ventures, LP to AirNet Communications Corporation dated January 20, 2003 (with letter to escrow agent
attached).                                                            
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.27 (12) | Notice of Election to Convert from Tandem PCS Investments, LP to AirNet Communications Corporation dated January 20, 2003 (with letter to
escrow agent attached).                                                     
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.28 (12) | Escrow Agreement dated January 20, 2003 by and among AirNet Communications Corporation, Tandem PCs Investments, LP, SCP Private Equity Partners
II, LP, Mellon Ventures, LP and Edwards& Angell, LLP, as escrow agent.
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.29 (12) | Technology Collateral Escrow Agreement effective January 24, 2003 among DSI Technology Escrow Services, Inc., AirNet Communications
Corporation, TECORE, Inc. and SCP Private Equity Partners II, LP                  
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.30 (12) | Collateral Assignment of Patents, Trademarks & Copyrights dated January 24, 2003 by and among AirNet Communications Corporation, SCP
Private Equity Partners II, LP and TECORE, Inc.                                  
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.31 (13) | Terms sheet dated March 25, 2003 among AirNet Communications Corporation, SCP Private Equity Partners
II, LP and TECORE, Inc.                                                                                         
|           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|23.1       | Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.                                                                                                                                                                                     

(1)Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement No. 333-87693 on Form S-1 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 24, 1999, as amended.

(2)Incorporated by reference to Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2000.

(3)Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 15, 2000.

(4)Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2000.

(5)Incorporated by reference to Schedule 14A as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 7, 2000.

(6)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 17, 2001.

(7)Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3,
2001.

(8)Incorporated by reference
to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2001.

(9)Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2002.

(10)Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2002.

(11)Incorporated by reference to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2002.

(12)Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 28, 2003.

(13)Incorporated by reference to
Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2003.







---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



|                                                                                                               | PAGE
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----
|                                                                                                               |     
|Independent Auditors Report                                                                                   | F-2 
|                                                                                                               |     
|Balance Sheets (restated) at December 31, 2002 and 2001                                                        | F-3 
|                                                                                                               |     
|Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2002 (restated), 2001 and 2000.                      | F-4 
|                                                                                                               |     
|Statements of Stockholders Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2002 (restated), 2001
(restated), and 2000 | F-5 
|                                                                                                               |     
|Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000.                                 | F-6 
|                                                                                                               |     
|Notes to Financial Statements                                                                                  | F-7 

F -
1



---

##### Table of Contents

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT

To the Board of Directors
ofAirNet Communications Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of AirNet Communications Corporation (the Company) as of December 31,
2002 and 2001, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in
Note 1 to the financial statements, the Companys recurring losses from operations, negative cash flows, and accumulated deficit raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Managements plans concerning these
matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As discussed in Note 1, the
Company changed its method of accounting for gains and losses on extinguishments of debt in 2002 to conform with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 145.

As
discussed in Note 17, the accompanying financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 have been restated.



|                                                                                                                                                      |  |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 
|/s/ DELOITTE&TOUCHELLP                                                                                                                                |  |  | 
|Certified Public AccountantsOrlando, FloridaMarch 31,
2003 (May 13, 2003 as to Note 16 and as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 17)













F - 2



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONBALANCE SHEETS



|                                                                                                                                                                         |  | As of December 31,   |           
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------- | ----------
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  | 2002                 |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  | As Restated(Note 17) |           
|ASSETS                                                                                                                                                                   |  |                      |           
|CURRENT ASSETS                                                                                                                                                           |  |                      |           
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                                                                                |  | $                    | 3,205,478 
|Accounts receivable - net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,200,000 and $3,404,290 in 2002 and
2001, respectively                                                 |  | 569,348              |           
|Inventories                                                                                                                                                              |  | 14,459,025           |           
|Notes receivable                                                                                                                                                         |  | 923,266              |           
|Other                                                                                                                                                                    |  | 1,062,553            |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS                                                                                                                                                     |  | 20,219,670           |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT                                                                                                                                                   |  |                      |           
|Test equipment and other                                                                                                                                                 |  | 12,951,197           |           
|Computer equipment                                                                                                                                                       |  | 5,864,391            |           
|Software                                                                                                                                                                 |  | 3,425,461            |           
|Office equipment, furniture, and fixtures                                                                                                                                |  | 644,320              |           
|Leasehold improvements                                                                                                                                                   |  | 937,398              |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  | 23,822,767           |           
|Accumulated depreciation                                                                                                                                                 |  | (15,663,247          | )         
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET                                                                                                                                              |  | 8,159,520            |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|OTHER ASSETS                                                                                                                                                             |  |                      |           
|Long-term notes receivable, less current portion (net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $0 and $1,400,000 in FY 2002 and 2001, respectively)                         |  | 277,856              |           
|Other long-term assets                                                                                                                                                   |  | 2,172,998            |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|TOTAL OTHER ASSETS                                                                                                                                                       |  | 2,450,854            |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|TOTAL ASSETS                                                                                                                                                             |  | $                    | 30,830,044
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY                                                                                                                                     |  |                      |           
|CURRENT LIABILITIES                                                                                                                                                      |  |                      |           
|Accounts payable                                                                                                                                                         |  | $                    | 2,801,144 
|Accrued payroll and other expenses                                                                                                                                       |  | 3,597,109            |           
|Current portion of capital lease obligations                                                                                                                             |  | 53,291               |           
|Customer deposits                                                                                                                                                        |  | 101,296              |           
|Deferred revenues                                                                                                                                                        |  | 1,402,851            |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES                                                                                                                                                |  | 7,955,691            |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|LONG-TERM LIABILITIES                                                                                                                                                    |  |                      |           
|Long-term accounts payable                                                                                                                                               |  | 800,496              |           
|Capital lease obligations less current portion                                                                                                                           |  | 15,998               |           
|Other long term liabilities                                                                                                                                              |  | 20,569               |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES                                                                                                                                              |  | 837,063              |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|TOTAL LIABILITIES                                                                                                                                                        |  | 8,792,754            |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES                                                                                                                                            |  |                     |           
|REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK (LIQUIDATION VALUE OF $60,000,000 PLUS
ACCRUED DIVIDENDS)                                                                         |  |                     |           
|STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY                                                                                                                                                     |  |                      |           
|Convertible preferred stock (liquidation value of $60,000,000 plus accrued
dividends)                                                                                    |  | 27,338,319           |           
|Common Shares, $.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 23,851,177 and 23,789,865 issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively, |  | 23,851               |           
|Additional paid in capital                                                                                                                                               |  | 213,519,692          |           
|Accumulated deficit                                                                                                                                                      |  | (218,486,666         | )         
|Deferred stock-based compensation                                                                                                                                        |  | (73,919              | )         
|Notes receivable - officer and former officer                                                                                                                            |  | (283,987             | )         
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY                                                                                                                                               |  | 22,037,290           |           
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           
|TOTAL LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY                                                                                                                                 |  | $                    | 30,830,044
|                                                                                                                                                                         |  |                      |           

See notes to financial statements.

F -
3



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONSTATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSYEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000



|                                                                                           |  | 2002                 |             | 2001        |   | 2000        |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------- | ----------- | ----------- | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                                           |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|                                                                                           |  | As Restated(Note 17) |             |             |   |             |  
|NET REVENUES                                                                               |  | $                    | 23,026,082  |             | $ | 14,544,223  |  
|COST OF REVENUES                                                                           |  | 17,415,422           |             | 16,717,053  |   | 23,901,905  |  
|WRITE-DOWN OF EXCESS AND OBSOLETE INVENTORY                                                |  | 144,700              |             | 8,758,659   |   | 7,302,320   |  
|                                                                                           |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|Gross profit (loss)                                                                        |  | 5,465,960            |             | (10,931,489 | ) | 3,127,821   |  
|                                                                                           |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|OPERATING EXPENSES (GAINS):                                                                |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|Research and development                                                                   |  | 12,543,815           |             | 25,563,216  |   | 29,634,807  |  
|Sales and marketing                                                                        |  | 5,432,134            |             | 11,935,772  |   | 10,447,472  |  
|General and administrative *                                                               |  | 3,039,470            |             | 11,645,649  |   | 12,741,433  |  
|Gain on vendor settlements                                                                 |  | (703,618             | )           | (1,921,605  | ) |            |  
|                                                                                           |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|Total costs and expenses                                                                   |  | 20,311,801           |             | 47,223,032  |   | 52,823,712  |  
|                                                                                           |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|LOSS FROM OPERATIONS                                                                       |  | (14,845,841          | )           | (58,154,521 | ) | (49,695,891 | )
|                                                                                           |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)                                                                     |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|Interest income                                                                            |  | 443,079              |             | 848,873     |   | 4,699,926   |  
|Interest expense                                                                           |  | (11,162              | )           | (81,721     | ) | (82,567     | )
|Loss on disposal of fixed assets                                                           |  | (1,660               | )           | (199,565    | ) |            |  
|Other, net                                                                                 |  | (32,546              | )           | (24,708     | ) | 54,979      |  
|                                                                                           |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|OTHER INCOME - net                                                                         |  | 397,711              |             | 542,879     |   | 4,672,338   |  
|                                                                                           |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|                                                                                           |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|NET LOSS                                                                                   |  | (14,448,130          | )           | (57,611,642 | ) | (45,023,553 | )
|ACCRETION OF DISCOUNT - PREFERRED STOCK                                                    |  | (7,494,788           | )           | (1,036,025  | ) |            |  
|ACCRETION OF CUMULATIVE PREFERRED DIVIDENDS                                                |  | (2,400,000           | )           | (1,500,000  | ) |            |  
|                                                                                           |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK                                                      |  | $                    | (24,342,918 | )           | $ | (60,147,667 | )
|                                                                                           |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|                                                                                           |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING - USED IN CALCULATING BASIC AND
DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE |  | 23,822,913           |             | 23,783,637  |   | 23,579,467  |  
|                                                                                           |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|                                                                                           |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  
|NET LOSS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS BASIC AND
DILUTED                   |  | $                    | (1.02       | )           | $ | (2.53       | )
|                                                                                           |  |                      |             |             |   |             |  

*Includes a bad debt recovery of $1.2 million and a reversal of $1.4 million in 2002 of previously recorded allowances for
doubtful accounts



See notes to financial
statements.

F -
4



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONSTATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITYYEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000



|                                                                   |  |                 |         |              |   |            |                    |        |            | AdditionalPaid inCapital |       |              |                                 |            |             | NoteReceivable-Officer and
FormerOfficer |   |              |           
|------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------- | ------- | ------------ | - | ---------- | ------------------ | ------ | ---------- | ------------------------ | ----- | ------------ | ------------------------------- | ---------- | ----------- | ---------------------------------------- | - | ------------ | ----------
|                                                                   |  |                 |         |              |   |            |                    |        |            |                          |       |              | DeferredStock-BasedCompensation |            |             |                                          |  
|                                                                   |  | Preferred Stock |         | Common Stock |   |            | AccumulatedDeficit |        |            |                          | Total |             
|                                                                   |  |                 |         |              |   |            |                    |        |            |                         
|                                                                   |  | Shares          |         | Amount       |   | Shares     |                    | Amount |            |                          |       |              |                                 |           
|                                                                   |  |                 |         |              |   |            |                    |        |            |                          |       |              |                                 |            |             |                                          |   |              |           
|BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 1999                                          |  |                |         | $            |  |            | 23,233,146         |        | $          | 23,233                   |       | $            | 211,235,646                     |            | $           | (101,403,341                             | ) | $            | (1,592,240
|                                                                   |  |                 |         |              |   |            |                    |        |            |                          |       |              |                                 |            |             |                                          |   |              |           
|Forfeitures of stock options                                       |  |                |         |             |   |           |                    |       |            | (213,270                 | )     |             |                                 | 213,270    |             |                                         |   |             |           
|Exercise of common stock options                                   |  |                |         |             |   | 521,489    |                    | 522    |            | 771,767                  |       |             |                                 |           |             |                                         |   | 772,289      |           
|Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation                  |  |                |         |             |   |           |                    |       |            |                         |       |             |                                 | 378,251    |             |                                         |   | 378,251      |           
|Offering costs related to previous public offering                 |  |                |         |             |   |           |                    |       |            | (91,921                  | )     |             |                                 |           |             |                                         |   | (91,921      | )         
|Exercise of warrants                                               |  |                |         |             |   | 10,210     |                    | 10     |            | 37,460                   |       |             |                                 |           |             |                                         |   | 37,470       |           
|Note Receivable from officer                                       |  |                |         |             |   |           |                    |       |            |                         |       |             |                                 |           |             | (112,660                                 | ) | (112,660     | )         
|Net income (loss)                                                  |  |                |         |             |   |           |                    |       |            |                         |       | (45,023,553  | )                               |            |             |                                          |   | (45,023,553  | )         
|                                                                   |  |                 |         |              |   |            |                    |        |            |                          |       |              |                                 |            |             |                                          |   |              |           
|BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2000                                          |  |                |         |             |   | 23,764,845 |                    | 23,765 |            | 211,739,682              |       | (146,426,894 | )                               | (1,000,719 | )           | (112,660                                 | ) | 64,223,174   |           
|Warrants / conversion features series B preferred stock            |  |                |         |              |   |           |                    |       |            | 14,273,884               |       |             |                                 |           |             |                                         |   | 14,273,884   |           
|Exercise of common stock options                                   |  |                |         |             |   | 25,020     |                    | 25     |            | 39,171                   |       |             |                                 |           |             |                                         |   | 39,196       |           
|Forfeiture of common stock options                                 |  |                |         |             |   |           |                    |       |            | (487,107                 | )     |             |                                 | 487,107    |             |                                         |   |             |           
|Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation                  |  |                |         |             |   |           |                    |       |            |                         |       |             |                                 | 158,858    |             |                                         |   | 158,858      |           
|Accretion of issuance costs and discounts, As Restated (Note 17)   |  |                |         |             |   |           |                    |       |            | (1,036,025               | )     |             |                                 |           |             |                                         |   | (1,036,025   | )         
|Note Receivable from officer                                       |  |                |         |             |   |           |                    |       |            |                         |       |             |                                 |           |             | (178,957                                 | ) | (178,957     | )         
|Accretion of cumulative preferred dividends, As Restated (Note 17) |  |                 |         |              |   |            |                    |        |            | (1,500,000               | )     |             |                                 |            |             |                                          |   | (1,500,000   | )         
|Net loss                                                           |  |                |         |             |   |           |                    |       |            |                         |       | (57,611,642  | )                               |            |             |                                          |   | (57,611,642  | )         
|                                                                   |  |                 |         |              |   |            |                    |        |            |                          |       |              |                                 |            |             |                                          |   |              |           
|BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2001, As Restated (Note 17)                   |  |                |         |             |   | 23,789,865 |                    | 23,790 |            | 223,029,605              |       | (204,038,536 | )                               | (354,754   | )           | (291,617                                 | ) | 18,368,488   |           
|Exercise of common stock options                                   |  |                |         |             |   | 61,312     |                    | 61     |            | 17,214                   |       |             |                                 |           |             |                                         |   | 17,275       |           
|Forfeiture of common stock options                                 |  |                |         |             |   |           |                    |       |            | (32,339                  | )     |             |                                 | 32,339     |             |                                         |   |             |           
|Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation                  |  |                |         |             |   |           |                    |       |            |                         |       |             |                                 | 248,496    |             |                                         |   | 248,496      |           
|Accretion of issuance costs and discounts, As Restated (Note 17)   |  |                |         |             |   |           |                    |       |            | (1,630,938               | )     |             |                                 |           |             |                                         |   | (1,630,938   | )         
|Accretion of remaining beneficial discount, As restated (Note 17)  |  |                |         |             |   |           |                    |       |            | (5,863,850               | )     |             |                                 |           |             |                                         |   | (5,863,850   | )         
|Note Receivable from officer                                       |  |                |         |             |   |           |                    |       |            |                         |       |             |                                 |           |             | 7,630                                    |   | 7,630        |           
|Recharacterization of redeemable preferred stock                   |  | 955,414         |         | 25,338,319   |   |           |                    |       |            |                         |       |             |                                 |           |             |                                         |   | 25,338,319   |           
|Accretion of cumulative preferred dividends, As Restated (Note 17) |  |                |         | 2,000,000    |   |           |                    |       |            | (2,000,000               | )     |             |                                 |           |             |                                         |   |             |           
|Net loss                                                           |  |                |         |              |   |           |                    |       |            |                         |       | (14,448,130  | )                               |           |             |                                         |   | (14,448,130  | )         
|                                                                   |  |                 |         |              |   |            |                    |        |            |                          |       |              |                                 |            |             |                                          |   |              |           
|BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2002, As Restated (Note 17)                   |  |                 | 955,414 |              | $ | 27,338,319 |                    |        | 23,851,177 |                          | $     | 23,851       |                                 | $          | 213,519,692 |                                          | $ | (218,486,666 | )         
|                                                                   |  |                 |         |              |   |            |                    |        |            |                          |       |              |                                 |            |             |                                          |   |              |           



See notes to financial statements

F -
5



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONSTATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSYEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2002, 2001 AND 2000



|                                                                               |  | 2002       |             | 2001        |   | 2000        |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---------- | ----------- | ----------- | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|OPERATING ACTIVITIES                                                           |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|Net loss                                                                       |  | $          | (14,448,130 | )           | $ | (57,611,642 | )
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:    |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|Depreciation and amortization of assets                                        |  | 3,374,563  |             | 3,798,285   |   | 2,140,245   |  
|Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation                              |  | 248,496    |             | 158,858     |   | 378,251     |  
|Provision for (recovery of) losses on accounts and notes receivable            |  | (1,545,416 | )           | 5,677,249   |   | 7,272,952   |  
|Loss on disposal of fixed assets                                               |  | 1,660      |             | 199,565     |   |            |  
|Write down for inventory obsolescence                                          |  | 144,700    |             | 8,758,659   |   | 7,302,320   |  
|Gain on Vendor Settlements                                                     |  | (703,618   | )           | (1,921,605  | ) |             |  
|Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                                   |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|Accounts and notes receivable                                                  |  | 7,562,625  |             | 4,739,951   |   | (8,330,025  | )
|Inventories                                                                    |  | 7,267,369  |             | 2,139,251   |   | (24,093,128 | )
|Other current assets                                                           |  | 817,092    |             | (851,309    | ) | (528,018    | )
|Other long-term assets                                                         |  | (35,621    | )           | (1,541,246  | ) | (574,695    | )
|Accounts payable                                                               |  | (2,940,635 | )           | (4,030,086  | ) | 6,734,088   |  
|Accrued payroll, other expenses, and other liabilities                         |  | 801,061    |             | (2,159,044  | ) | 2,034,288   |  
|Customer deposits                                                              |  | (446,649   | )           | (1,010,312  | ) | (2,835,837  | )
|Deferred revenue                                                               |  | (1,234,852 | )           | (4,523,643  | ) | (7,078,006  | )
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|Total adjustments                                                              |  | 13,310,775 |             | 9,434,573   |   | (17,577,565 | )
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES                                          |  | (1,137,355 | )           | (48,177,069 | ) | (62,601,118 | )
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|INVESTING ACTIVITIES                                                           |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|Cash paid for acquisition of capital assets                                    |  | (217,137   | )           | (3,311,810  | ) | (8,699,688  | )
|Proceeds from the disposal of fixed assets                                     |  | 179,262    |             | 162,641     |   |            |  
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES                                          |  | (37,875    | )           | (3,149,169  | ) | (8,699,688  | )
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|FINANCING ACTIVITIES                                                           |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|Net proceeds from issuance of preferred and common stocks                      |  | 17,275     |             | 29,663,627  |   | 717,838     |  
|Notes receivable issued to officers                                            |  |           |             | (1,217,130  | ) | (112,660    | )
|Payments for officers notes receivable                                        |  | 7,630      |             |            |   |            |  
|Principal payments on capital lease obligations                                |  | (345,843   | )           | (1,286,096  | ) | (859,360    | )
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES                            |  | (320,938   | )           | 27,160,401  |   | (254,182    | )
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS                                      |  | (1,496,168 | )           | (24,165,837 | ) | (71,554,988 | )
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR                                   |  | 4,701,646  |             | 28,867,483  |   | 100,422,471 |  
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR                                         |  | $          | 3,205,478   |             | $ | 4,701,646   |  
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|Cash paid during the year for interest                                         |  | $          | 11,162      |             | $ | 81,721      |  
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES            |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|Property and equipment acquired under capital lease obligations                |  | $          | 37,034      |             | $ | 682,785     |  
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|Sales under long-term arrangements                                             |  | $          |            |             | $ |            |  
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|Issuance of warrants in connection with redeemable convertible preferred
stock |  | $          |            |             | $ | 14,273,884  |  
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  
|Reclassification of accounts payable to long-term accounts payable             |  | $          | 800,496     |             | $ | 2,021,561   |  
|                                                                               |  |            |             |             |   |             |  

See notes to financial statements.

F -
6



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSYEARS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002 (AS RESTATED), 2001 AND 2000

1.NATURE OF
OPERATIONS, BUSINESS OPERATIONS AND GOING CONCERN

Nature of Operations  AirNet Communications Corporation (the Company or AirNet) is engaged in the design,
development, manufacture, and installation of broadband, software-defined base stations, base station controllers, and related wireless infrastructure components for wireless telecommunications in the Global Systems for Mobile Communications (GSM)
market. This product and service line represents the Companys one reportable segment as defined by FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Statement 131,Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information. The Company was founded in 1994 and is incorporated in the state of Delaware.

Business Operations and Going Concern  The accompanying
financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business; and, as a consequence, the financial statements do not include any
adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company has
experienced net operating losses and negative cash flows since inception and, as of December 31, 2002, had an accumulated deficit of $218.5 million. Cash used in operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 was $1.1 million
and $48.2 million, respectively. The Company expects to have a net operating loss in 2003. At December 31, 2002, the Companys principal source of liquidity was $3.2 million of cash and cash equivalents. Such conditions raise substantial doubt
that the Company will be able to continue as a going concern. The Company will require additional funding. As of March 28, 2003 the Companys cash balance was $3.7 million, which includes a draw of $4.8 million against a Bridge Loan for interim
funding (see Note 16).The amounts drawn against the bridge loan are due and payable on May 24, 2003. The Companys current 2003 operating plan projects that cash available from planned revenue combined with the $3.7 million on hand at March 28,
2003 will not be adequate to defer the requirement for additional funding. The Companys current negotiations for additional financing of $16 million, if successful (a portion of which will be used to pay off the Bridge Loan), is expected to
provide funding needed for the Company to continue operations. See Note 16 to Financial Statements  Subsequent Events for further explanation. There can be no assurances that the proposed financing can be finalized on terms acceptable to the
Company, if at all, or that the negotiated proposed financing will be adequate to sustain operations through 2003.

The Companys future results of operations involve a
number of significant risks and uncertainties. The worldwide market for telecommunications products such as those sold by the Company has seen dramatic reductions in demand as compared to the late 1990s and 2000. It is uncertain as to when or
whether market conditions will improve. The Company has been negatively impacted by this reduction in global demand and by the resulting inability to generate sufficient revenues to cover expenses and reach profitability. Other factors that could
affect the Companys future operating results and cause actual results to vary from expectations include, but are not limited to, ability to raise capital, dependence on key personnel, dependence on a limited number of customers (with one
customer accounting for 49% of the revenue for 2002), ability to design new products, the erosion of product prices, the ability to overcome deployment and installation challenges in developing countries which may include political and civil risks
and risks relating to environmental conditions, product obsolescence, ability to generate consistent sales, ability to finance research and development, government regulation, technological innovations and acceptance, competition, reliance on
certain vendors and credit risks. The Companys ultimate ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time will depend on the Company increasing its revenues and/or reducing its expenses and securing enough additional
funding to enable the Company to reach profitability. The Company's historical sales results and its current backlog do not give the Company sufficient visibility or predictability to indicate when the required higher sales levels might be achieved,
if at all.

Since it is unlikely that the Company will achieve profitable operations in the near term, and since the Company will continue to consume cash in the foreseeable
future, the Company must reduce the negative cash flows in the near term, or secure additional funding to continue operations. However, there can be no assurances that the Company will succeed in achieving this goal, and failure to do so in the near
term will have a material adverse effect on its business, prospects, financial condition and operating results and its ability to continue as a going concern. As a consequence, the Company may be forced to seek protection under the bankruptcy laws.
In that event, it is unclear whether the Company could successfully reorganize the capital structure and operations, or whether it could realize sufficient value for its assets to satisfy fully the debts or liquidation preference obligations to the
preferred stockholders. Accordingly, should the Company file for bankruptcy, there is no assurance that any value would be received by its stockholders.

SUMMARY OF
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements,
and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Vulnerability Due to Certain Concentrations
and Other Risks The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers financial condition and generally does not require collateral on accounts receivable; hence, the accounts receivable are unsecured
and the Company is at risk to the extent such amounts become uncollectible. Customers are billed as contractual milestones are met, including deposits of up to 50% of the contracted amount at the inception of the contract. However, collection of the
entire amounts due under the Companys contracts to date have lagged behind shipment of products due to the substantial time period between shipment and the fulfillment of post-shipment contractual obligations. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001,
the total due from two customers represented 71% and 54%, respectively, of accounts and notes receivable, with one customer representing 63% and 43%, respectively, of accounts and notes receivable.

F-7



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
(Continued)

The Companys customers are comprised primarily of cellular service providers. The majority of the Companys
sales have been to customers in the United States, wherein communications are subject to the regulations imposed by the U.S. Federal CommunicationsCommission. Sales outside the US commenced
in 2000 and totaled approximately $6.7 million, $2.8 million, and $2.8 million in 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively.

Long-Lived
Assets  The Company periodically reviews long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. If the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest) attributable to the assets, less estimated future cash outflows, are less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is required to be recognized. The amount of
the loss is measured by the difference between the asset carrying value and its fair value. No impairment losses were recorded in 2002, 2001, or 2000.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)  Comprehensive income (loss) includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. There were no
changes in equity during the years presented herein exclusive of investments by owners and losses from operations. As such, the comprehensive loss for all periods presented is equal to the amount shown on the statement of operations as net loss.

Stock-Based Compensation The Company has adopted the disclosure
only provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (Statement No. 123).  Under Statement No. 123, companies have the option to measure compensation costs for stock
options using the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB No. 25).  Under APB No. 25, compensation expense is generally not recognized when both the
exercise price is the same as the market price and the number of shares to be issued is set on the date the employee stock option is granted.

If the Company had elected to recognize compensation expense for the issuance of options to employees of the Company based on the fair value method of accounting prescribed by Statement No. 123, net loss and loss
per share would have been increased to the pro forma amounts as follows:



|YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                                               
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|                                                                       
|Net loss attributable to common stock                                  
|Add: stock based compensation expense included     in reported net loss
|Pro forma compensation expense                                         
|                                                                       
|Pro forma net loss attributable to common stock                        
|                                                                       
|Net loss per share attributable to common                              
|stock  basic and diluted                                              
|                                                                       
|Net loss per share attributable to common                              
|stock  basic and diluted, pro forma                                   
|                                                                       

Financial Instruments  The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet under cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, accounts payable and capital lease obligations approximate fair value due to the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments.

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time and are based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument; they are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and
matters of judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Companys entire holdings of a particular instrument.
Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates.

Cash Equivalents  The Company considers all highly liquid
investments with maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The Companys policy is to invest excess funds with only well-capitalized financial institutions.

Inventories  Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (determined by the first-in, first-out basis) or market. Inventories are reviewed periodically and items
considered to be slow moving or obsolete are written down to their estimated net realizable value. Finished goods delivered to customers are recorded in inventories until the related revenue is recognized.

Property and Equipment  Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related
assets, which range from two to five years. Assets held under capital leases and leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the related leases.

Capitalized Software Development Costs  In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise
Marketed, (Statement 86), the Company capitalizes the costs associated with internally developed software products. Initial costs are charged to operations as research and development prior to the development of a detailed program design or a
working model. Costs incurred subsequent to the products release, and research and development performed as contractual requirements are charged to operations. The costs of this capitalized software development are amortized over the estimated
useful lives of the product.

Revenue Recognition  Revenue from product sales is recognized after delivery, after
determination that the fee is fixed and determinable and collectibility is probable, and after resolution of any uncertainties regarding satisfaction of all significant terms and conditions of the customer contract. While a customer has the right to
reject and return a product, none of the Companys contracts contain a contractual right of refund. If a product is rejected, the Companys sole contractual obligation is to repair or replace the product. Customer acceptance is a two-step
process: conditional acceptance and final acceptance. Contractual payments are due when each of these milestones has been reached. Although the Company has never failed to achieve acceptance, such a failure would not entitle the customer to a refund
but rather the Company, in such an event, would be obliged to diligently resolve the conditions preventing acceptance.

Revenue is
recognized for Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) and reseller product sales when title to the product passes to the OEM customer. Typically, for these product sales, title passes to the customer at the point of shipment.

Warranty and Customer Support  The Company typically warrants its products against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of one year
from the date of revenue recognition. A provision for estimated future warranty and customer support is recorded when revenue is recognized.

F-8



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Research and Development Expenses Expenditures relating to the development of new products and processes, including significant improvements to existing
products, are expensed as incurred. These expenses include continued product development and engineering support costs for test development and technical services.

Income
Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and to operating loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that the change in the rate is enacted.

Recent Pronouncements In June 2001, the FASB issued two new pronouncements:Statement of Financial Accounting Standards(Statement) No. 141,Business Combinations(Statement 141) and Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, (Statement 142). Statement
141 prohibits the use of the pooling-of-interest method for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and also applies to all business combinations accounted for by the purchase method that are completed after June 30, 2001. There are also
transition provisions that apply to business combinations completed before July 1, 2001, that were accounted for by the purchase method. Statement 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 to all goodwill and other
intangible assets recognized in an entitys statement of financial position at that date, regardless of when those assets were initially recognized. The adoption of Statements 141 and 142, effective January 1, 2002, did not have a material
impact on the Company.

In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment of or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets(Statement 144). Statement 144 establishes a single accounting model for all long-lived assets, including business segments, to be disposed of. Under Statement 144, discontinued operations are no longer measured at net
realizable value but at fair value. Future operating losses are no longer included as part of discontinued operations. Statement 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The Company adopted Statement 144 effective January
1, 2002. The adoption of Statement 144 did not have any impact on the Company.

On April 30, 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 145, Rescission of FASB
Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections(Statement 145) which updates, clarifies and simplifies existing accounting pronouncements. The rescission of FASB Statement No. 4
eliminates the requirement to report all gains and losses resulting from the early extinguishments of debt as extraordinary items. Statement 145 is effective for all transactions occurring after May 15, 2002, with earlier application encouraged. The
Company adopted this Statement to be effective during the quarter ended June 30, 2002. As a result, the Company has reclassified an extraordinary gain on vendor settlements of $1,921,605 to operating expenses in the accompanying 2001 statement of
operations.

In June 2002 the FASB issued Statement No. 146,Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities(Statement 146). Statement 146 addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-3. Statement 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or
disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred and is effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company.

In December 2002 the FASB issued Statement No. 148,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation  Transition and Disclosure  an amendment of Statement No.
123(Statement 148.) Statement 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. This statement also amends the
disclosure requirements of Statement 123 and APB Opinion No. 28,Interim Financial Reporting, to require prominent disclosure in both annual and interim financial statements about method of accounting
for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company has not yet determined whether it will voluntarily change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation.

In November 2002 the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (FIN 45),Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Direct
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. This interpretation requires the Company to record, at the inception of a guarantee, the fair value of the guarantee as a liability, with the offsetting entry being recorded based on the
circumstances in which the guarantee was issued. Fundings under the guarantee are to be recorded as a reduction of the liability. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of FIN 45 in the fourth quarter of 2002 and will apply the initial
recognition and initial measurement provisions on a prospective basis for all guarantees issued after December 31, 2002. Adoption of FIN 45 will have no impact on the Companys historical financial statements, as existing guarantees are not
subject to the measurement provisions of FIN 45. The impact on future financial statements will depend on the nature and extent of any issued guarantees but is not expected to have a material effect on the Companys financial
statements.

Loss Per Share Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding. Net loss attributable to common stockholders is computed by adding dividends accrued but unpaid and accretion of discounts on cumulative preferred stocks to the net loss reported. Diluted net loss per share equals basic net loss
per share for all periods reported since potential common shares are anti-dilutive. A reconciliation of the components used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share follows:

F-9



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)



|                                                                                       |  | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ----------
|                                                                                       |  |                          |           
|                                                                                       |  | 2002                     |           
|                                                                                       |  |                          |           
|Net loss, as reported                                                                  |  | $                        | 14,448,130
|                                                                                       |  |                          |           
|Plus Series B preferred dividends                                                      |  | 2,400,000                |           
|Plus accretion of discounts on redeemable preferred stock                              |  | 7,494,788                |           
|                                                                                       |  |                          |           
|                                                                                       |  |                          |           
|Net loss attributable to common stockholders                                           |  | $                        | 24,342,918
|                                                                                       |  |                          |           
|                                                                                       |  |                          |           
|Weighted average common shares outstanding                                             |  | 23,822,913               |           
|Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted, as reported |  | $                        | (1.02     

For the above-mentioned periods, the Company had securities outstanding
that may have increased the loss per share but were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share in the periods presented since their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. The potential number of common shares into which these
outstanding securities were convertible is as follows:



|                                           |  | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |          
|------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------ | ---------
|                                           |  |                          |          
|                                           |  | 2002                     |          
|                                           |  |                          |          
|Convertible preferred stock                |  |                          | 9,554,140
|Outstanding options                        |  | 399,979                  |          
|Warrants                                   |  |                         |          
|                                           |  |                          |          
|Total                                      |  | 9,954,119                |          
|                                           |  |                          |          
|Weighted average exercise price of options |  | $                        | 0.45     
|Weighted average exercise price of warrant |  | $                        | 3.31     

Reclassifications Certain amounts
in the 2001 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2002 classifications.

2.INVENTORIES



|                                      |  | AS OF DECEMBER 31, |           
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ----------
|                                      |  |                    |           
|                                      |  | 2002               |           
|                                      |  |                    |           
|Raw Materials                         |  | $                  | 10,986,216
|Work in Process                       |  | 1,850,265          |           
|Finished Goods.                       |  | 155,062            |           
|Finished Goods Delivered to Customers |  | 1,467,482          |           
|                                      |  |                    |           
|                                      |  | $                  | 14,459,025
|                                      |  |                    |           

At December 31, 2002, one customer on open accounts receivable represented 63% of the net carrying amount of accounts receivable, a significant concentration of
credit risk. This customers balance is current as of December 31, 2002.

Provision for doubtful accounts and notes receivable amounted to $1,054,584, $5,677,249, and
$7,272,952 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. Notes and accounts receivable recoveries totaled $1,200,000 and $0 in 2002 and 2001, respectively. In addition there was a reversal of the allowance for notes receivable
of $1,400,000 in 2002. The allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivable of $1,200,000 at December 31, 2002 is considered adequate by management, based on current knowledge of customer status and market conditions, to absorb estimated losses
in the accounts receivable portfolio.

F-10



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

The chart below (in $ millions) details the change in the allowance for doubtful accounts for the following periods:



|                        |  | AccountsReceivable |     | NotesReceivable |  
|----------------------- |  | ------------------ | --- | --------------- | -
|                        |  |                    |     |                 |  
|                        |  |                    |     |                 |  
|Balance 12/31/99        |  | $                  | 1.5 |                 | $
|Provision for bad debts |  | 3.5                |     | 3.7             |  
|Recoveries              |  |                   |     |                |  
|Chargeoffs              |  | (0.9               | )   |                |  
|                        |  |                    |     |                 |  
|                        |  |                    |     |                 |  
|Balance 12/31/00        |  |                    | 4.1 |                 |  
|Provision for bad debts |  | 1.3                |     | 4.4             |  
|Recoveries              |  |                   |     |                |  
|Chargeoffs              |  | (2.0               | )   | (6.7            | )
|                        |  |                    |     |                 |  
|                        |  |                    |     |                 |  
|Balance 12/31/01        |  |                    | 3.4 |                 |  
|Provision for bad debts |  | 1.1                |     |                |  
|Reversal                |  |                   |     | (1.4            | )
|Recoveries **           |  | (1.2               | )   |                |  
|Chargeoffs              |  | (2.1               | )   |                |  
|                        |  |                    |     |                 |  
|                        |  |                    |     |                 |  
|Balance 12/31/02        |  | $                  | 1.2 |                 | $
|                        |  |                    |     |                 |  

** Recoveries due to payment of account.

In mid-2000, management decided to provide vendor
financing in select situations, including one customer whose open account of $9,015,051 was converted to a note receivable in June 2000, due on December 31, 2000. The customer defaulted on the note and the Company provided for an allowance for the
estimated loss exposure of $3.7 million under the note at December 31, 2000. The Company entered into a mediated settlement agreement with the customer on March 29, 2001. The settlement agreement provided for the recovery of inventory, application
of customer deposits and a cash payment of $3 million to be paid on or before July 29, 2001, which in the aggregate was sufficient to settle the customers account, assuming the amounts owed were collected in full, without further loss to the
Company. This amount was collected in full on July 25, 2001.

4.OTHER LONG
TERM ASSETS

Other long-term assets consist of the following at December 31, 2002 and 2001 respectively:



|                                         |  | AS OF DECEMBER 31, |          
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | ---------
|                                         |  |                    |          
|                                         |  | 2002               |          
|                                         |  |                    |          
|Licensing and software development costs |  | $                  | 2,048,525
|Other long-term assets                   |  | 124,473            |          
|                                         |  |                    |          
|                                         |  |                    |          
|                                         |  | $                  | 2,172,998
|                                         |  |                    |          

Licensing and software development costs include amounts paid under
separate agreements with external, unrelated parties. The agreements relate to both license fees and software development costs.

The license fee agreements are for software to
be used in the AdaptaCell Super Capacity Base Station and in the integration of the Company developed next generation standards into AirNet's product. The license terms for both of these agreements are perpetual with payments made as certain Company
development milestones are reached. Total amounts paid under these agreements were approximately $0.9 million at December 31, 2001 and 2002 with the remaining balance of approximately $1.7 million in licensing fees to be made as certain, specified
milestones are reached. Payments are expected to be made in 2003, 2004, and 2005.

The agreement for development costs includes certain external costs for testing and
development of the AdaptaCell Super Capacity Base Station. The Company has capitalized approximately $1.1 million of software costs under this agreement, with an additional $0.1 million anticipated in 2003, and expects commercial availability of the
product late in 2003 or early in 2004 at which point amortization of the capitalized software costs will begin.

5.CONVERTIBLE NOTE AND WARRANT

On September 12, 1997, the Company entered into a
Convertible Note and Warrant purchase agreement with Harris Corporation (Harris), pursuant to which Harris purchased a secured convertible promissory note and a warrant for $4,000,000. The Harris note was secured by all assets of the Company and
bore interest at an annual rate of 8%. The Harris note was convertible into 112,296,970 shares of the Companys

F-11



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)



Series E voting cumulative preferred stock, and the Harris warrant was exercisable for the purchase of an
additional 11,229,697 shares of Series E voting cumulative preferred stock at a warrant exercise price of $0.0356 per share. The fair value of the Harris warrant was calculated at$112,297 at the date of grant. This fair value
was accounted for as a discount on the note, and was being amortized over the life of the note.

Harris exercised its right of conversion of the note with a carrying value of
$3,965,687 in September 1998 and received 112,296,970 shares of the Companys Series E voting convertible preferred stock and the note was canceled. Harris transferred ownership of the warrant to its wholly owned subsidiary, VFC Capital, Inc.
The warrant expired unexercised on September 12, 2002.

6.BRIDGE FINANCING

Through a private placement in June and July 1999, the Company issued $6,338,187 of securities comprised of convertible promissory notes (1999 Bridge Notes) with attached
warrants (the Bridge Warrants). The investors in these securities were also preferred stockholders. The 1999 Bridge Notes, which were to mature on December 11, 2000, bore interest at a rate of prime plus 2% and were payable upon maturity. The 1999
Bridge Notes were collateralized by a security interest in all assets of the Company, subordinated to a first lien for any debt incurred to finance receivables and inventory. The 1999 Bridge Notes were automatically convertible in the event that the
Company closed on a private financing of at least $10 million or closed on an initial public offering of the Companys common stock. As of September 16, 1999, the carrying value and accrued interest on the 1999 Bridge Notes totaling $6,485,985
was converted into Series G senior voting convertible preferred stock, which was subsequently converted into Company common stock.

The Bridge Warrants vested immediately, have a
ten-year term, and contain a cashless exercise option. Warrants to purchase 518,335 shares of common stock were issued in June and August 1999 at an exercise price of $3.67 per share. In May 2001, the number of shares that can be purchased upon
exercise of the warrants and the exercise price per share were adjusted pursuant to the anti-dilution rights of the warrants as a result of the Companys sale of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock at an effective exercise price of $3.14 per
share. As of December 31, 2002, warrants to purchase 456,945 shares of common stock were outstanding at an exercise price of $3.49 per share. The Bridge Warrants issued in June 1999 expire on June 10, 2009. The Bridge Warrants issued on August 2,
1999 expire on August 1, 2009. The fair value of the Bridge Warrants was calculated at $1,032,180. The fair value was determined using the Black-Scholes model based on the following assumptions:



|Volatility               |  |          | 40.7 | %
|------------------------ |  | -------- | ---- | -
|Expected life.           |  | 10 years |     
|Fair value of stock.     |  | $        | 3.67 |  
|Dividend rate.           |  | 0        | %   
|Risk-free interest rate. |  |          | 6.11 | %

7.REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK (SERIES B PREFERRED)

On May 16, 2001, the Company
issued 955,414 shares of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock to three existing stockholders at $31.40 per share for a total face value of $30 million. The Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock was recorded in the initial amount
of $15,307,506 (face value of $30 million less issuance costs of $418,610 and the fair value totaling $14,273,884 of detachable warrants and of the beneficial non-detachable conversion feature discussed below.) The stock is redeemable at the option
of the holder, at any time after May 31, 2006 by the Company out of funds legally available for such purposes and initially each preferred share is convertible, at any time, into ten shares of common stock. Holders of preferred stock are entitled to
votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which each preferred stockholding converts and collectively to elect two members of the Board of Directors. Upon liquidation of the Company, or if a majority of the preferred stockholders
agrees to treat a change in control or a sale of all or substantially all of the Companys assets (with certain exceptions) as a liquidation, the preferred stockholders are entitled to 200% of their initial purchase price plus accrued but
unpaid dividends before any payments to any other stockholders.

In association with this preferred stock offering, the Company issued detachable warrants to purchase 2,866,242
shares of common stock for $3.14 per share. The warrants expire on May 14, 2011 and are recorded in additional paid in capital at their estimated fair value of $7,136,942, resulting in a like amount of discount on the preferred stock. The discount
is being amortized using the effective interest method over the preferred stock redemption period.

An additional discount for $7,136,942, related to the intrinsic value of the
beneficial conversion feature embedded in the preferred stock was also recorded as additional paid capital, after valuation of the warrants issued. The discount is recorded as an offset to the preferred stock and is being amortized over the
preferred stock redemption period.

Effective October 31, 2002, the holders of all of the Companys Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock irrevocably and
permanently waived the right of optional redemption applicable to the Series B Preferred Stock as well as the right to treat a specific proposed Sale of the Corporation as a Liquidation Event, as defined, to the extent that such treatment would
entitle the Series B Holders to receive their liquidation amount per share in a form different from the consideration to be paid to holders of the Companys common stock in connection with such sale of the Corporation. As a result of the
irrevocable removal of the redemption feature associated with the Series B preferred stock, the Company has reclassified the Series B preferred stock to stockholders equity in the accompanying 2002 balance sheet, and has charged the remaining
unamortized discount related to the beneficial conversion feature of $5,863,850 as of October 31, 2002 (See note 17).

F-12



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

8.STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

Officers and employees of the Company are awarded options periodically for the purchase of common stock of the Company under the Companys 1994 Stock Option Plan, as amended. The options, which expire five to ten
years from the date of grant, are exercisable equally over a vesting period up to four years.

Effective April 1998, under the Companys 1996 Independent Director Stock
Option Plan, as amended, each independent director of the Company was eligible to receive a grant of options.

Effective September 1, 1999, the Company adopted the 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan (1999 Plan), which amended and restated the 1994 Stock Option and the 1996 Independent Director Stock Option Plan. The 1999 Plan provides for the issuance of a maximum of 3,206,841 shares of common stock pursuant to the grant of
incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, performance awards and other stock-based awards to employees, directors, and independent contractors. In the event of a change in control, as defined,
two years of pending vesting, as to all stock options issued and outstanding, will be accelerated for all option holders.

The following table summarizes option activity for the
years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000:



|                                 |  | SHARES     |           | EXERCISE PRICE RANGE |       | WEIGHTEDAVERAGEEXERCISEPRICE | 
|-------------------------------- |  | ---------- | --------- | -------------------- | ----- | ---------------------------- | 
|                                 |  |            |           |                      |       |                              | 
|Outstanding at December 31, 1999 |  |            | 2,029,562 |                      | $     | 0.066                        | 
|Granted                          |  | 591,645    |           | 6.063                |       | 58.500                       | 
|Terminated                       |  | (149,709   | )         | 0.066                |       | 39.750                       | 
|Exercised                        |  | (521,489   | )         | 0.066                |       | 10.620                       | 
|                                 |  |            |           |                      |       |                              | 
|                                 |  |            |           |                      |       |                              | 
|Outstanding at December 31, 2000 |  | 1,950,009  |           |                      | 0.066 |                              | 
|Granted                          |  | 2,142,815  |           | 0.450                |       | 7.81                         | 
|Terminated                       |  | (1,600,603 | )         | 0.066                |       | 58.500                       | 
|Exercised                        |  | (25,020    | )         | 0.066                |       | 3.320                        | 
|                                 |  |            |           |                      |       |                              | 
|                                 |  |            |           |                      |       |                              | 
|Outstanding at December 31, 2001 |  | 2,467,201  |           |                      | 0.500 |                              | 
|Granted                          |  | 130,742    |           | 0.500                |       | 4.000                        | 
|Terminated                       |  | (142,045   | )         | 0.450                |       | 56.500                       | 
|Exercised                        |  | (61,312    | )         | 0.066                |       | 3.319                        | 
|                                 |  |            |           |                      |       |                              | 
|                                 |  |            |           |                      |       |                              | 
|Outstanding at December 31, 2002 |  |            | 2,394,586 |                      | $     | 0.500                        | 
|                                 |  |            |           |                      |       |                              | 

For options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2002, the
exercise price ranges and weighted average exercise prices and remaining lives are as follows:



|                 | OPTIONS OUTSTANDING |         | OPTIONS EXERCISABLE |              
|---------------- | ------------------- | ------- | ------------------- | -------------
|                 |                    
|PRICE RANGE      |                     | NUMBER  |                     | REMAININGLIFE
|                 |                     |         |                     |              
|$0.00 -$1.00     |                     |         | 1,145,566           |              
|1.01 -2.50       |                     | 315,981 |                     | 4.9 years    
|2.51 -5.00       |                     | 463,707 |                     | 7.9 years    
|5.01 -7.50       |                     | 51,304  |                     | 8.0 years    
|Greater than7.50 |                     | 418,028 |                     | 6.8 years    
|                 |                     |         |                     |              
|                 |                     |         |                     |              
|                 |                     |         | 2,394,586           |              
|                 |                     |         |                     |              

The outstanding options expire at various dates through December 2012.
At December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 a total of 1,455,915, 389,382, and 407,811 shares were exercisable respectively, with a weighted average exercise price of $4.11, $7.90, and $3.83 per share respectively. The weighted average remaining
contractual life of options at December 31, 2002 with exercise prices ranging from $0.45 to $55.63 is 7.7 years. The weighted average fair value of the options issued for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 is $0.76, $3.10, and $20.09,
respectively.

F-13



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

The weighted average exercise prices and fair values of options whose exercise price equal, or are less than, the market price on the grant date are as follows for the years ended December 31:



|                          |  | 2002          |      | 2001      |   | 2000          | 
|------------------------- |  | ------------- | ---- | --------- | - | ------------- | 
|                          |  |               |      |           |   |               | 
|                          |  | EXERCISEPRICE |      | FAIRVALUE |   | EXERCISEPRICE | 
|                          |  |               |      |           |   |               | 
|                          |  |               |      |           |   |               | 
|OPTIONS ISSUED:           |  |               |      |           |   |               | 
|Equal market price        |  | $             | 0.85 |           | $ | 0.76          | 
|Greater than market price |  | $             | 4.00 |           | $ | 1.08          | 

At December 31, 2002, a total of 1,504,667
shares of the Companys common stock were available for future grants of stock options.

Total compensation expense for options issued at an exercise price below fair value
at the date of grant was $248,496, $158,858, and $378,251 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line method over the vesting period of the options.

Pro forma information regarding net loss is required by Statement 123 and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value
method of that Statement. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using the following assumptions:



|                        |  | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |  
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------ | -
|                        |  |                          |  
|                        |  | 2002                     |  
|                        |  |                          |  
|Risk-free interest rate |  | 3.61                     | %
|Expected life           |  | 4 years                  |  
|Divided yield           |  | 0.00                     | %
|Volatility              |  | 160.90                   | %

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the
options is amortized to expense over the options vesting periods. The effect of applying Statement 123s fair value method to the Companys stock options granted in 2002, 2001 and 2000 results in the following pro forma amounts:



|                                                   |  | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |            
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | -----------
|                                                   |  |                          |            
|                                                   |  | 2002                     |            
|                                                   |  |                          |            
|Proforma net loss attributable to common stock     |  | $                        | (25,652,976
|Proforma net loss per share attributable to common |  |                          |            
|stock  basic and diluted.                         |  | $                        | (1.08      

9.NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM OFFICER AND FORMER OFFICER

On November 9, 2000, the Company loaned
a former officer of the Company $112,660, payable in full on November 9, 2005 at 6.01% interest, payable semiannually. The loan was made to reimburse the officer for an amount paid by him to exercise an option to purchase 113,274 shares of the
Companys common stock in February 2000 and is accordingly classified in stockholders equity. The note is collateralized by the underlying value of the stock and the Company has full recourse against the officer in the event of a default.
The unpaid principal amount of the note, which is classified as a deduction from stockholders equity together with all accrued and unpaid interest and any other sums owing under the note, are payable on November 9, 2005, the fifth anniversary
of the date of the note. Interest was payable on November 9, 2001 and semi-annually thereafter. A portion of the collateral stock was sold in the first quarter of 2002 and the proceeds of $41,503, including interest income of $6,534 and prepaid
interest of $27,339 were transmitted to the Company on April 15, 2002 bringing payments on the note current. The Company continues to pursue collection of the note. The Company believes, given the full recourse provisions of the note, that the funds
held in a brokerage account, subject to an account control agreement, and the prepaid interest on the note provide adequate protection against default on the note.

On March 14,
2001, the Company loaned a former officer of the Company $995,133 at an interest rate of 5.07% per annum secured by his pledge of stock under an Account Control Agreement dated as of March 14, 2001 among the officer, Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. and
the Company. The principal represents the amount that the Company loaned to the officer to satisfy the alternative minimum tax liability incurred in connection with his exercise of Company options in February 2000. The unpaid principal amount of the
note, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and any other sums owing under the note, is payable on March 14, 2006, the fifth anniversary of the date of the note. As of December 31, 2002, the entire principal amount of the note is
outstanding. As of December 31, 2002 the note is not in default; however, a net balance of $0 is recorded in equity since an allowance of

F-14



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

$995,133 was recorded during 2001 for the estimated loss on this loan, given that there is no recourse on the note and that the former officer is no longer associated with the Company. The
Company is not recognizing any interest associated with this note.

On March 16, 2001, the Company loaned another officer of the Company $221,997 at an interest rate of 5.07% per
annum. The note is secured by the pledge of the officers stock under an Account Control Agreement dated as of March 16, 2001 among the officer, Salomon Smith Barney Inc. and the Company. The principal represents the amount the Company loaned
to the officer to satisfy the alternative minimum tax liability incurred in connection with the exercise of options to purchase 25,261 shares of common stock in March 2000. The unpaid principal amount of the note, together with all accrued and
unpaid interest and any other sums owing under the note, is payable on March 16, 2006, the fifth anniversary of the date of the note. As of December 31, 2002 the entire principal amount and accrued interest of the note is outstanding however, it is
not due. The note was valued at a market rate of interest (9%) and accordingly a discount of $43,040 was recorded against the note. The Company is not recognizing any interest income associated with this note.

10.EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLAN

The
Company sponsors a retirement plan for all employees through a salary deduction 401-K savings plan. Employees are permitted to contribute to the plan up to 15% of eligible wages, not to exceed the maximum amount allowable by law. Commencing on
January 1, 2000, the Company began a matching contribution of $0.50 for each $1.00 contributed by the employee, up to 3% of the employees annual base salary. The Companys contribution vests ratably over a four-year period. Effective
January 27, 2003 the Company stopped matching contributions. Total contributions made by the Company in 2002, 2001 and 2000 were $287,173, $454,074, and $459,867, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2001 there was a partial termination
of the plan due to the employee turnover during the year and as a result the vesting accelerated for those impacted by the reduction in force.

11.INCOME TAXES

At December 31, 2002, the Company has approximately $162,097,000, of net operating loss
carryforwards remaining to offset future taxable income. These net operating losses will expire at various dates through 2022. In addition, the Company has available approximately $2,958,000 of research and development tax credit carryforwards,
expiring at various dates through 2022, which may be used to offset future regular tax liabilities. The benefit of all of these carryforwards has been fully offset by a valuation allowance at December 31, 2002 and 2001 because it is considered more
likely than not that the benefits of the carryforwards will not be realized. U.S tax rules impose limitations on the use of net operating losses and tax credits following certain defined changes in ownership. The Company has performed the complex
analysis to determine if net operating losses and tax credits are limited by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) through December 7, 1999, the date of the Companys initial public offering. The study was finalized in 2000. Through
December 7, 1999, the Company had incurred two changes of ownership as defined by Section 382. As a result of the two changes of ownership, approximately $37,191,000 of net operating losses are no longer available to offset future taxable income. A
corresponding reduction of approximately $13,995,000 has been made to the deferred tax asset related to net operating losses and the related valuation allowance. These adjustments to the deferred tax asset and the related valuation allowance were
reflected in the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2000.

Since December 8, 1999, the Company has not updated the Section 382 analysis to
determine if another ownership change has occurred. If another change were deemed to have occurred, the new Section 382 limitation could reduce or eliminate the amount of net operating loss benefits that would be available to offset future taxable
income each year, starting with the year of the ownership change.

A reconciliation of the statutory income tax rate to the Companys effective tax rate is as follows:



|                                           |  | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |           
|------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------ | ----------
|                                           |  |                          |           
|                                           |  | 2002                     |           
|                                           |  |                          |           
|                                           |  |                          |           
|Tax benefit at federal income tax rate     |  | $                        | (4,912,365
|State income taxes, net of federal benefit |  | (524,467                 | )         
|Research and development credits           |  | (239,895                 | )         
|Other                                      |  | 119,934                  |           
|Sec. 382 limitation                        |  |                         |           
|Increase in valuation allowance            |  | 5,556,793                |           
|                                           |  |                          |           
|                                           |  |                          |           
|Effective tax rate                         |  | $                        |          
|                                           |  |                          |           

F-15



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

Significant components of the net deferred tax balances are as follows:



|                                        |  | AS OF DECEMBER 31, |            
|--------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ | -----------
|                                        |  |                    |            
|                                        |  | 2002               |            
|                                        |  |                    |            
|CURRENT                                 |  |                    |            
|Deferred tax assets:                    |  |                    |            
|Inventories                             |  | $                  | 5,581,794  
|Bad debts                               |  | 526,820            |            
|Other                                   |  | 1,018,113          |            
|                                        |  |                    |            
|                                        |  |                    |            
|Total deferred tax assets               |  | 7,126,727          |            
|Deferred tax liabilities                |  | (295,563           | )          
|                                        |  |                    |            
|                                        |  |                    |            
|Net deferred tax assets                 |  | 6,831,164          |            
|Valuation allowance                     |  | (6,831,164         | )          
|                                        |  |                    |            
|                                        |  |                    |            
|NONCURRENT                              |  |                    |            
|Deferred tax assets:                    |  |                    |            
|Net operating loss carryforwards        |  | $                  | 60,997,118 
|Research and development credits        |  | 2,958,078          |            
|Organizational costs                    |  |                   |            
|Fixed assets                            |  |                   |            
|Other                                   |  | 21,387             |            
|                                        |  |                    |            
|                                        |  |                    |            
|                                        |  | 63,976,583         |            
|Deferred tax liabilities  accruals     |  | (262,169           | )          
|Deferred tax liabilities  fixed assets |  | (806,497           | )          
|                                        |  |                    |            
|                                        |  |                    |            
|Net deferred tax assets                 |  | 62,907,917         |            
|Valuation allowance                     |  | $                  | (62,907,917
|                                        |  |                    |            

No amounts were paid for income taxes during any of the periods
presented.

12.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases  The Company leases its primary manufacturing and office facilities under long-term noncancelable operating leases. The Company also has operating leases for certain other
furniture, equipment and computers. Future minimum lease payments for long-term noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2002 are as follows:



|2003 |  | $      | 374,365 | 
|---- |  | ------ | ------- | 
|2004 |  | 54,911 |        
|2005 |  | 33,384 |        
|     |  |        |        
|     |  | $      | 462,660 | 
|     |  |        |         | 

Rental expense charged to operations was $617,908, $1,425,831, and
$1,182,020 for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Capital Lease Obligations  The Company also leases certain computer and test equipment under
capital lease agreements, which are reported as computer equipment in the accompanying financial statements. The net carrying value of such equipment is as follows:



|                         |  | DECEMBER 31, |        
|------------------------ |  | ------------ | -------
|                         |  |              |        
|                         |  | 2002         |        
|                         |  |              |        
|                         |  |              |        
|Cost                     |  | $            | 262,130
|Accumulated depreciation |  | (78,788      | )      
|                         |  |              |        
|                         |  |              |        
|                         |  | $            | 183,342
|                         |  |              |        

F-16



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

A schedule of future minimum lease payments under capital leases for the Company and the related present value of the net minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2002 follows:



|2003                                             |  | $       | 58,981 | 
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ------- | ------ | 
|2004                                             |  | 13,210  |       
|2005                                             |  | 4,823   |       
|                                                 |  |         |       
|                                                 |  |         |       
|Total minimum lease payments                     |  | 77,014  |       
|Less amount representing interest                |  | (7,725  | )     
|                                                 |  |         |       
|                                                 |  |         |       
|Present value of lease payments                  |  | 69,289  |       
|Less capital lease obligations  current portion |  | (53,291 | )     
|                                                 |  |         |       
|                                                 |  |         |       
|Capital lease obligations, less current portion  |  | $       | 15,998 | 
|                                                 |  |         |        | 

Agreements Simultaneously with its
equity investment in January 1995, Motorola, Inc. (Motorola) entered into an agreement with the Company whereby Motorola was granted the right to obtain non-exclusive, royalty-free licenses under any two of AirNets patents of Motorolas
choice. In return, the Company and Motorola have agreed not to enjoin the other and to negotiate license agreements in good faith with respect to possible patent infringement. In the event of a merger, consolidation or sale of AirNet, the Company
has the option to require Motorola to either exercise its rights to obtain such licenses or to cancel such right in exchange for a payment by AirNet of $1 million per patent.

Litigation On August 14, 2001, the Companys vendor MC Test Service, Inc. d/b/a MC Assembly and Test filed an action against the Company in the Circuit Court for the 18th Judicial Circuit in Brevard County,
Florida alleging, among other things, breach of contract and seeking damages in the amount of $1,300,000. The Company filed an answer raising affirmative defenses and a counterclaim seeking damages from MC Assembly and Test in excess of $5,000,000.
The Company believes MC Assembly and Test shipped defective products, which resulted in lost business opportunities and hampered collections of the Company's outstanding receivables. In June 2002, the Company and MC Assembly and Test entered into a
settlement agreement. The terms of the settlement agreement call for performance by both parties, including the purchase of products and the satisfaction of accounts payable during the third quarter of 2002. The terms of the agreement were met
during the third quarter of 2002 and the matter is considered closed by both parties. The effect of the settlement agreement is included as a gain on vendor settlements in the accompanying financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2002.

The Company, the members of the underwriting syndicate involved in the Companys initial public offering and two of the Companys former officers have been named
as defendants in a class action lawsuit filed on November 16, 2001 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The action, number 21 MC 92 (SAS), alleges that the defendants violated federal securities laws and seeks
unspecified monetary damages and certification of a plaintiff class consisting of all persons and entities who purchased, converted, exchanged or otherwise acquired shares of the Companys common stock between December 6, 1999 and December 6,
2000, inclusive. Specifically, the complaint charges the defendants with violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In substance, the allegations are that the underwriters
of the Companys initial public offering charged commissions in excess of those disclosed in the initial public offering materials and that these actions were not properly disclosed. The Company does not know whether the claims of misconduct by
the underwriters have merit but at this time the Company believes the claims against it are without merit and intends to defend this matter when appropriate. Under the terms of the Underwriting Agreement, the Company has claims against the
underwriters of the initial public offering for indemnification and reimbursement of all of the costs and any damages incurred in connection with this lawsuit and the Company intends to pursue those claims vigorously. On July 15, 2002 the
Issuers Committee filed a Motion to Dismiss on behalf of all issuers and individual defendants. In February 2003, the Motion to Dismiss was granted in part (with respect to AirNet) and denied in part (with respect to all issuer defendants).
Discovery in this litigation is commencing while settlement talks between the plaintiffs and the issuers continue. The claims against the Companys two former officers named in the class action lawsuit have been dismissed without prejudice. The
Company is not able to predict the impact, if any, the ultimate resolution of this lawsuit may have on its financial position or future results of operations.

In addition to the
items listed above the Company is also involved in various claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business. With respect to these matters, the Company believes that it has adequate legal defenses such that the ultimate
outcome will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys future financial position or results of operations.

Purchase Commitments
On December 15, 2000 the Company entered into an agreement to purchase from a vendor (TECORE Wireless Systems) ten integrated switch products through December 31, 2002. Alternatively, the Company may buy-out the commitment by purchasing $3.0 million
of TECORE common stock. Additionally, TECORE has an agreement dated December 13, 2001 with the Company to purchase products from AirNet under a reseller agreement dated October 31, 2001. As of December 31, 2002 the Company has purchased seven of the
original ten products from TECORE. As of December 31, 2002 TECORE had placed orders with AirNet for $13.2 million resulting in revenue in 2002 for the Company of $11.3 million. Each agreement was negotiated separately and no terms in either
agreement are dependent upon terms in the other agreement. Pursuant to the pending financing agreement TECORE is a related party.

Bonus Accrual
For the year ended December 31, 2002 the Company provided an accrual for employee bonuses of $1.2 million. These bonuses, which were recorded as earned in accordance with a Board approved bonus program, were scheduled to be paid in January 2003.
Subsequent to year end, the Company entered into negotiations with SCP and Tecore (the Lenders) (see Note 16) and payment of the bonuses have been deferred until payment is approved by the Lenders.

F-17



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

13.MAJOR CUSTOMERS

Revenue generated from major customers representing more than 10% of net revenues during at least one of the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 is summarized below:



|           |  | YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, |           
|---------- |  | ------------------------ | ----------
|           |  |                          |           
|           |  | 2002                     |           
|           |  |                          |           
|Customer A |  | $                        | 11,278,863
|Customer B |  | $                        | 4,871,823 
|Customer C |  | $                        | 1,093,230 
|Customer D |  | $                        | 83,091    
|Customer E |  | $                        | 231,256   
|Customer F |  | $                        | 16,800    
|Customer G |  | $                        |          
|Customer H |  | $                        | 178,900   

14.VENDOR SETTLEMENT PROGRAM AND LONG TERM ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

During 2002, the Company entered into
agreements with certain vendors to settle outstanding accounts payable totaling approximately $1,010,934 at discounts from the recorded liabilities, resulting in a gain, net of expenses, of $703,618 which is recorded as a gain from vendor
settlements in the accompanying 2002 statements of operations. The vendors agreed, in exchange for the settlement, to release the Company from future liabilities related to these settled balances.

During the third and fourth quarters of 2001, the Company entered into agreements with certain vendors to settle outstanding payables totaling $11,280,221 at varying discounts from the recorded liability. The vendors
agreed, in exchange for the settlement, to release the Company from future liability related to the settled balances. The total gain recorded as a result of these settlements was $1,921,605, net of expenses which is recorded in the accompanying 2001
statements of operations.

In addition, during 2001, the Company negotiated extended payment terms relating to accounts payable totaling approximately $2,323,886 with certain
other vendors. These restructured terms included a partial payment by the Company of approximately $648,236 with remaining payments to be paid, as additional product is purchased from these vendors. The timing of these additional payments cannot be
estimated since it is contingent upon the Companys demand for each vendors product and accordingly the unpaid balances of $1,675,650 are included in accounts payable at December 31, 2002. Under agreements with these vendors, the Company
pledged general inventory as security for any unpaid balances, payable upon the sale of the Company.

During the fourth quarter 2001 the company entered into long-term agreements
with certain vendors to settle outstanding payables over a period in excess of one year. The long-term agreements require monthly or quarterly payments as well as certain milestone and final settlement payments. Amounts due under these agreements in
excess of one year are recorded as long-term accounts payable in the accompanying financial statements. In addition to the liability recorded in the accompanying financial statements there are open purchase commitments with two of these vendors
totaling approximately $1.8 million. The schedule of payments remaining is as follows:



|2003  |  | $       | 1,114,168 | 
|----- |  | ------- | --------- | 
|2004  |  | 731,168 |          
|2005  |  | 69,328  |          
|      |  |         |          
|Total |  | $       | 1,914,664 | 
|      |  |         |          

Included in the long-term agreements with three of these vendors is a
Security Agreement granting these vendors a security interest in the Companys tangible property. These rights do not include the Companys intellectual property and the rights can be subordinated in the event that the Company successfully
raises additional funding in excess of $6.0 million.

15.RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS

Pursuant to a consulting agreement with a relative of an officer, consulting services are provided to the Company with respect to evolving telecommunications
standards and business development opportunities in the military, public safety, law enforcement and government sectors. The agreement provides for a payment not to exceed $5,000 per month and is terminable at will by either party with thirty
days notice. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 the payments made under this agreement were $14,500, $71,074, and $63,116, respectively.

F-18



---

##### Table of Contents

AIRNET COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued)

16.SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On
January 24, 2003, the Company entered into a Bridge Loan Agreement (the Loan Agreement), with TECORE, Inc., a Texas corporation (Tecore), and SCP Private Equity Partners II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (SCP and together with Tecore, the
Lenders), pursuant to which each of the Lenders agreed, subject to the terms of the Loan Agreement, to make loans to the Company of up to $3,000,000 (collectively, the Commitments), for an aggregate interim financing of $6,000,000. The loans are to
be repaid in cash by May 24, 2003 or such other date as the parties agree upon in writing. The annual interest rate on the loans is 2% plus prime rate as quoted inThe Wall Street Journal. If the Senior Debt Funding Agreement described below
is signed, the Company anticipates that the bridge repayment due May 24, 2003 will be extended until the closing of the financing. However, there can be no guarantees that any extensions will be granted.

The Loan Agreement provides that the Commitments will be secured by a security interest in all of the Companys assets, including without limitation its intellectual property, in favor of the Lenders under the
terms and conditions of a Security Agreement (the Security Agreement) dated as of the date of the Loan Agreement. The Company may draw down the balance of the Commitments in its discretion upon compliance with certain conditions set forth in the
Loan Agreement. Each Lender provided an initial advance to the Company of $800,000 on January 24, 2003 for an aggregate of $1,600,000. Maximum cumulative draws, including the initial draw of $1,600,000, may be made according to the following
schedule:



|DRAW DOWN DATE             |  |   | AMOUNT    | 
|-------------------------- |  | - | --------- | 
|                           |  |   |           | 
|Prior to February 24, 2003 |  | $ | 1,600,000 | 
|Prior to March 25, 2003    |  | $ | 3,200,000 | 
|Prior to April 24, 2003    |  | $ | 4,800,000 | 
|On or after April 24, 2003 |  | $ | 6,000,000 | 

Additionally, on January 24, 2003, the Company entered into a non-binding terms sheet with the Lenders, which was revised on March 25, 2003, for an investment (the
Investment) of $16,000,000 (including a rollover of the Bridge Notes) in the form of senior secured convertible notes. The Company continues to negotiate with the Lenders but can provide no assurance that the Investment agreement will be executed.
Pursuant to the revised terms sheet, the targeted contractual date for closing the Investment was April 24, 2003, but this targeted date was not met. The targeted date for signing the investment agreement is expected to be no later than May 31,
2003. The Company cannot predict when or if definitive agreements will be signed or how long it will take thereafter to obtain the requisite stockholder and regulatory approvals.

A condition of the Investment, if made, is that the holders of the Companys Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (Series B Preferred Stock), SCP, Tandem PCS Investments, LP (Tandem) and Mellon Ventures, LP (Mellon and together with SCP
and Tandem, the Series B Holders) irrevocably elect to convert the aggregate number of 955,414 shares of Series B Preferred Stock currently outstanding into 19,108,281 shares of common stock at the closing of the Investment and agree to the
cancellation of their warrants to purchase a total of 2,866,242 shares of the Companys common stock. The Series B Holders have each signed a written notice (collectively, the Notices) electing to convert their shares of Series B Preferred
Stock contingent upon closing of the Investment and have become parties to an Escrow Agreement, pursuant to which the Notices, the certificates representing the Series B Preferred Stock and a General Release from Tandem (collectively, the Conversion
Documents) will be escrowed until the closing of the Investment. In addition, Mellon and Tandem have entered into a separate agreement, pursuant to which Mellon will purchase all the shares of the Companys common stock held by Tandem
(including the shares received upon conversion of its shares of Series B Preferred Stock into common stock) at the closing of the Investment, for an aggregate purchase price of $500,000. Upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock, the $60
million liquidation preference and other rights and privileges of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock shall expire.

Tecore was the Companys largest customer, based on
revenues, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and is a supplier of switching equipment to the Company. Affiliates of SCP currently hold 15.1% of the outstanding shares of the Companys common stock and combined with the voting rights
associated with their ownership of Series B Preferred Stock beneficially owns 20.3% of the voting power of the Company, which represents the Companys largest single voting block. The Chairman of the Companys board of directors is an
affiliate of SCP.

F-19



---

##### Table of Contents

17.  RESTATEMENT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



As further described in Note
7, on May 16, 2001, the Company issued 955,414 shares of Series B redeemable convertible preferred stock (the Series B stock) to three existing stockholders at $31.40 per share for a total face value of $30 million. The Series B stock was recorded
in the initial amount of $15,307,506 (face value of $30 million less issuance costs of $418,610 and the fair value totaling $14,273,884 of detachable warrants and of the beneficial conversion feature discussed below.) The stock at issuance was
redeemable by the Company at any time after May 31, 2006 at the option of the holder and each preferred share is convertible, at any time, into ten shares of common stock. Dividends accrue to the preferred stockholders, whether or not declared, at
8% cumulatively per annum.

In association with this preferred stock offering, the Company issued detachable warrants to purchase 2,866,242 shares of common stock for $3.14 per share.
The warrants were recorded in additional paid in capital at their estimated fair market value of $7,136,942, resulting in a like amount of discount on the preferred stock. The discount was to be amortized over the period from issuance to the
earliest possible redemption. An additional discount for $7,136,942, related to the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature embedded in the preferred stock, after considering the discount arising from the warrant discussed above, was
also recorded as additional paid in capital. This discount was also to be amortized over the period from issuance to the earliest possible redemption. Effective October 31, 2002, the holders of all of the Series B redeemable stock irrevocably and
permanently waived the right of optional redemption applicable to the Series B stock. As a result of the irrevocable removal of the redemption feature, the Company reclassified the Series B stock to stockholders' equity.

Subsequent to the issuance of the Company's 2002 financial statements, the Company determined that, as a result of the waivers and the reclassification of the carrying amount of the Series B stock to permanent
equity of the Company, the Company should have amortized the remaining discount resulting from the beneficial conversion feature in full on October 31, 2002 since the redemption right was waived, and the preferred stock was immediately convertible
into common stock at that date. The amortization of the discount on the warrants attributed to the Series B preferred stock should have also ceased on October 31, 2002.

The Company
has also determined that the accounting classification of the dividends accruable but not declared on the Series B Preferred stock from the issuance of the Series B stock was not in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 64 Redeemable Preferred Stock(SAB 64). The Company originally reported the accrued dividends during the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002 as a long-term liability and as an increase in the accumulated deficit.
Under SAB





---

##### Table of Contents

64, dividends accruable and payable as part of the mandatory redemption feature of a preferred stock should be added to the carrying value of the stock, rather
than being separately recorded as a liability, if not currently declared, and should be charged against additional paid in capital if the Company does not have retained earnings. Also as a result of the waiver on the redemption right, dividends
accrued but not declared for the series B preferred shares after October 31, 2002 will not be included in the carrying value of preferred stock.

As a result, the financial statements
as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, have been restated from the amounts previously reported.A summary of the
significant effects of the restatement on the Company's financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, is as follows:

For the
Year ended December 31, 2002

|                                                                                |   | As Previously Reported |   |  |   | Adjustments |   |  |   | As Restated |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ---------------------- | - |  | - | ----------- | - |  | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                                |   |                        |   |  |   |             |   |  |   |             |  
|Net Loss                                                                        | $ | (14,448,130            | ) |  |   |             |   |  | $ | (14,448,130 | )
|Accretion of Discount - Preferred Stock                                         | $ | (1,992,191             | ) |  | $ | (5,502,597  | ) |  | $ | (7,494,788  | )
|Accretion of Cumulative Preferred Dividends                                     | $ | (2,400,000             | ) |  |   |             |   |  | $ | (2,400,000  | )
|Net Loss Attributable to Common Stock                                           | $ | (18,840,321            | ) |  | $ | (5,502,597  | ) |  | $ | (24,342,918 | )
|Net Loss per Share Attributable to Common Shareholders -      Basic and Diluted | $ | (0.79                  | ) |  | $ | (0.23       | ) |  | $ | (1.02       | )



|                                                 | As of December 31, 2002 |                         | As of December 31, 2001
|------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------- | ----------------------- | -----------------------
|                                                 |                         |                         |                        
|                                                 |                         | As Previously  Reported |                        
|                                                 |                         |                         |                        
|Dividend Payable -      Series B Preferred Stock | $                       | 3,900,000               |                        
|Total Long Term Liabilities                      | $                       | 4,737,063               |                        
|Total Liabilities                                | $                       | 12,692,754              |                        
|Redeemable Convertible      Preferred Stock      | $                       |                        |                        
|Convertible Preferred Stock                      | $                       | 18,335,722              |                        
|Additional Paid in Capital                       | $                       | 225,550,505             |                        
|Accumulated Deficit                              | $                       | (225,414,882            | )                      
|Total Stockholders Equity                        | $                       | 18,137,290              |