Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 1997 / Notices 48887

has expired: Summary of Sentenced

Population Movement—Annual Data

Collection.

The proposed information collection

is published to obtain comments from

the public and affected agencies.

Comments are encouraged and will be

accepted for sixty days until November

17, 1997. This process is in accordance

with the Paperwork Reduction Act of

1995. Request written comments and

suggestions from the public and affected

agencies concerning the proposed

collection of information. Your

comments should address one or more

of the following four points:

(1) Evaluate whether the collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

agency, including whether the

information will have practical utility;

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

collection of information, including the

validity of the methodology and

assumptions used;

(3) Enhance the quality, utility and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

(4) Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g. permitting electronic submission of

responses.

If you have additional comments,

suggestions, or additional information,

especially regarding the estimated

public burden and associated response

time, please write to Dr. Jan M. Chaiken,

Director, Bureau of Justice Statistics,

810 Seventh St. NW, Washington, D.C.

20531. If you need a copy of the

collection instrument with instructions,

or have additional information, please

contact James Stephan at (202) 616–

3289, or via facsimile at 202–307–0128.

Overview of this information

collection:

(1) Type of information collection:

Reinstatement, without change, of a

previously approved collection for

which approval has expired.

(2) The title of the Form/Collection:

Summary of Sentenced Population

Movement, 1997.

(3) The agency form number and the

applicable component of the

Department sponsoring the collection:

Form: NPS–1. Corrections Unit, Bureau

of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice

Programs, United States Department of

Justice.

(4) Affected public who will be asked

to respond, as well as a brief abstract:

Primary: State Departments of

Corrections. Others: The Federal Bureau

of Prisons. Approximately 50 central

reporters (one from each State, the

District of Columbia, and the Federal

Bureau of Prisons) responsible for

keeping records on inmates under their

jurisdiction and in their custody will be

asked to provide prison admission

information for the following categories:

new court commitments, parole

violators, other conditional release

violators returned, transfers from other

jurisdictions, AWOLS and escapees

returned, and returns from bond and

appeal. Respondents will be asked to

provide prison release information for

the following categories: expiration of

sentence, commutations, other

conditional releases, probations,

supervised mandatory releases, paroles,

other conditional releases, deaths by

cause, AWOLS, escapes, transfers to

other jurisdictions, and releases to

appeal and bond. In addition,

respondents will be asked for data on

jurisdictional and custody populations

at yearend by gender for inmates with

over 1 year maximum sentence, and

inmates with a year or less maximum

sentence; for information on the number

of state inmates housed in facilities

operated by a county or other local

authority on December 31 to ease prison

crowding; inmates on December 31 by

race and Hispanic origin; testing of

incoming inmates for HIV; and HIV

infection and AIDS cases on December

31. The Bureau of Justice Statistics uses

this information in published reports

and for the U.S. Congress, Executive

Office of the President, practitioners,

researchers, students, the media, and

others interested in criminal justice

statistics.

(5) An estimate of the total number of

respondents and the amount of time

estimated for an average respondent to

respond: 52 respondents each taking an

average 6.5 hours to respond.

(6) An estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection: 338 annual burden hours.

If additional information is required

contact: Mr. Robert B. Briggs, Clearance

Officer, United States Department of

Justice, Information Management and

Security Staff, Justice Management

Division, Suite 850, Washington Center,

1001 G Street, NW, Washington, DC

20530.

Dated: September 12, 1997.

Robert B. Briggs,

Department Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 97–24634 Filed 9–16–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–18–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of August, 1997.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–33,654; Webster Lens Co.,

Webster, MA

TA–W–33,541; Acme Belt Co., Inc., New

York, NY

TA–W–33,678; Coval Corp., D.B.A.

Mays-Marshall & Meier, Warwick,

RI

TA–W–33,604; APV Crepaco, Div. of

APV North America, Inc., Lake

Mills, WI

TA–W–33,655; White Cap, Inc.,

Hayward, CA

TA–W–33,517 & A; Jackson Mills, Inc.,

Wellford, SC and New York, NY

TA–W–33,644; Gulton Graphics

Instruments, East Greenwich, RI

TA–W–33,684; Memorex Telex Corp.,

Computer Products, Raleigh, NC

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.
48888 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 1997 / Notices

TA–W–33,566; Fleet Services Corp Div.,

of Fleet Financial Group Inc.,

Boston, MA

TA–W–33,639; Big A Finishing Service,

New York, NY

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–33,597; Zimmer, Inc., A Div. of

Bristol Myers Squibb, Warsaw, IN

The investigation revealed that

criteria (2) and criteria (3) have not been

met. Sales or production did not decline

during the relevant period as required

for certification. Increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have not

contributed importantly to the

separations or threat thereof, and the

absolute decline in sales or production.

TA–W–33,724; Dee Forest Products, Inc.,

Hood River, OR

TA–W–33,671; Zenith Data Systems

Direct, A.K.A. Swan Technologies

Corp, State College, PA

TA–W–33,551; William Wrigley Jr. Co.,

Santa Cruz, CA

TA–W–33,603; Eagle Engineering &

Manufacturing, Inc., Welcome, MN

TA–W–33,658; ICI Paints North America

Devoe Coatings Co., Pennauken, NJ

TA–W–33,504; ABL Engineering, Inc.,

Mentor, OH

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–33,629; Richland Products, Inc.,

Lexington, OH

The subject firm transferred all

production to another domestic facility

during the relevant period. The subject

firm experienced no sales, production or

employment declines prior to the

decision to relocate production

domestically.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name & location for each determination

references the impact date for all

workers for such determination.

TA–W–33,435 & A; Pioneer Electronics

Technology, Inc., Pomona, CA and

Chico, CA: April 11, 1996.

TA–W–33,518; Yarnell Fabrics Corp.,

New York, NY: May 8, 1996.

TA–W–33,723; Acco USA, Inc.,

Swingline Div., Long Island City,

NY: August 1, 1996.

TA–W–33,505; Levolor Home Fashions,

Santa Monica, CA: May 7, 1996.

TA–W–33,659; Jennifer Dale., Inc., New

York, NY: June 24, 1996.

TA–W–33,649; Impac Manufacturing,

Inc., Cypress, CA: July 1, 1996.

TA–W–33,645; Northwestern Steel &

Wire Co., Houston, TX: June 27,

1996.

TA–W–33,707; Action Apparel, Inc.,

Starkville, MS: July 21, 1996.

TA–W–33,660; Cozy Dozy, Inc., Bristol,

TN: July 1, 1996.

TA–W–33,601; A.J. Apparel, Inc., Rocky

Mount, NC: June 10, 1996.

TA–W–33,593; Lithonia Lighting,

Conyers, GA: June 10, 1996.

TA–W–33,700; Oakmont Steel Inc., dba

Edgewater Steel Co., Oakmont, PA:

July 17, 1996.

TA–W–33,513; Levi Strauss and Co.,

Goodyear Cutting Facility, El Paso,

TX: & Operating in the following

locations: A; Pellicano Finishing

Facility, El Paso, TX, B; Lomaland

Plant, El Paso, TX, C; Eastside

Plant, El Paso, TX, D; Cypress Plant,

El Paso, TX, E; Airway Plant, El

Paso, TX, F; Amarillo Finishing

Plant, Amarilo, TX, G; Brownsville

Plant, Brownsville, TX, H;

Harlingen Plant, Harlingen, TX, I;

San Angelo Plant, San Angelo, TX,

J; San Antonio Plant, San Antonio,

TX, K; San Francisco Plant, San

Francisco, CA, L; Blue Ridge Plant,

Blue Ridge, GA, M; Valdosta Plant,

Valdosta, GA, N; Rosell Plant,

Roswell, NM, O; Albuquerque Plant,

Albuquerque, NM, P; Centerville

Plant, Centerville, TN, Q; Knoxville

Sewing Plant, Knoxville, TN, R;

Knoxville Finishing Plant,

Knoxville, TN, S; Mountain City

Plant, Mountain City, TN, T; Powell

Plant, Powell, TN, U; Warsaw Plant,

Warsaw, VA, V; San Antonio Plant,

San Antonio, TX: May 13, 1996.

TA–W–33,554; Christina J.

Manufacturing, Inc., New York, NY:

May 23, 1996.

TA–W–33,577; North Safety Products,

Rockford, IL: June 5, 1996.

TA–W–33,690 & A; Bemis Co., Inc.,

Memphis, TN and Pepperell, MA:

July 11, 1996.

TA–W–33,676; Federal Mogul Corp.,

Leiters Ford, IN: July 9, 1996.

TA–W–33,602; Sweatt’s Prefade, Inc.,

Opp, AL: May 5, 1996.

TA–W–33,702; Western Publishing Co.,

Inc., Fayetteville, NC: July 17, 1996.

TA–W–33,558; Angelica Image Apparel,

Summersville, MO: May 27, 1996.

TA–W–33,712; Thomas & Betts Corp.,

Mercer, PA: July 22, 1996.

TA–W–33,561; Stabilus, Colmar, PA:

May 23, 1996.

TA–W–33,661; Louisiana Pacific Corp.,

Dungannon, VA: July 30, 1996.

TA–W–33,730; Appalachian Corp.,

Monterey, TN: July 29, 1996.

TA–W–33,682; Rockwell Automation,

Allen-Bradley Div., Rhinelander,

WI: July 15, 1996.

Also, pursuant to Title V of the North

American Free Trade Agreement

Implementation Act (P.L. 103–182)

concerning transitional adjustment

assistance hereinafter called (NAFTA–

TAA) and in accordance with Section

250(a) Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II,

of the Trade Act as amended, the

Department of Labor presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for NAFTA–TAA

issued during the month of August,

1997.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

NAFTA–TAA the following group

eligibility requirements of Section 250

of the Trade Act must be met:

(1) that a significant number or

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, (including workers

in any agricultural firm or appropriate

subdivision thereof) have become totally

or partially separated from employment

and either—

(2) that sales or production, or both,

of such firm or subdivision have

decreased absolutely,

(3) that imports from Mexico or

Canada of articles like or directly

competitive with articles produced by

such firm or subdivision have increased,

and that the increases in imports

contributed importantly to such

workers’ separations or threat of

separation and to the decline in sales or

production of such firm or subdivision;

or

(4) that there has been a shift in

production by such workers’ firm or

subdivision to Mexico or Canada of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles which are produced by the firm

or subdivision.

Negative Determinations NAFTA–TAA

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criteria (3)

and (4) were not met. Imports from

Canada or Mexico did not contribute

importantly to workers’ separations.

There was no shift in production from

the subject firm to Canada or Mexico

during the relevant period.

NAFTA–TAA–01815; Jostens

Photography, Inc., Webster, NY

NAFTA–TAA–01717; R.R. Taylor Farms,

Inc., Hobb Sound, FL

NAFTA–TAA–01741; Zimmer, Inc., A

Div., of Bristol Myers Squibb,

Warsaw, IN

NAFTA–TAA–01800; Zenith Data

Systems Direct, A.K.A. Swan

Technologies Corp., State College,

PA

NAFTA–TAA–01830; Industrial Systems

Associates, Inc., Tucson, AZ
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 180 / Wednesday, September 17, 1997 / Notices 48889

NAFTA–TAA–01753; AG Labors, Inc.,

Clewiston, FL

NAFTA–TAA–01828; Memorex Telex

Corp., Computer Products, Raleigh,

NC

NAFTA–TAA–01768; Cane Tech, Inc.,

Clewiston, FL

NAFTA–TAA–01824; Rockwell

Automation, Allen-Bradley Div.,

Rhinelander, WI

NAFTA–TAA–01811; White Cap, Inc.,

Hayward, CA

NAFTA–TAA–01675; William Srigley Jr.

Company, Santa Cruz, CA

NAFTA–TAA–01730; Domi AGR, Inc.,

Belle Glade, FL

NAFTA–TAA–01653; Johnston

Industries, Inc., Wellington Sears

Div., Tarboro, NC

NAFTA–TAA–01762; B & J Sheffield

Harvesting, Inc., Loxahatchee, FL

NAFTA–TAA–01711; Lionel Beaver,

Moore Haven, FL

NAFTA–TAA–01704; APV Crepaco, Div.

of APV North America, Inc., Lake

Mills, WI

NAFTA–TAA–01723; Alger Farms,

Homestead, FL

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

NAFTA–TAA–01855; CMS Nomeco Oil

and Gas Co., Jackson, MI

The investigation revealed that the

workers of the subject firm did not

produce an article within the meaning

of Section 250(a) of the Trade Act, as

amended.

NAFTA–TAA–01852; Dee Forest

Products, Inc., Hood River, OR

A significant number of proportions

of the workers in such workers’ firm or

an appropriate subdivision (including

workers in any agricultural firm or

appropriate subdivision) have not

become totally or partially separated

from employment.

Affirmative Determination NAFTA–

TAA

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name & location for each determination

references the impact date for all

workers for such determination.

NAFTA–TAA–01734; A.J. Apparel, Inc.,

Rocky Mount, NC: May 26, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01688; Hearth

Technologies/Heat-N-Glo Div.,

Savage, MN: June 5, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01819 & A; Bemis

Company, Inc., Cordova, TN and

Pepperell, MA: June 30, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01845; Thomas & Betts

Corp., Mercer, PA: July 22, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01858; Caparo Steel Co.,

Farrell, PA: August 1, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01737; Georgia-Pacific,

Pearson, GA: June 5, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01692; J.R. Simplot Co.,

Food Div-Grand Rapids Plant,

Wyoming, MI: May 12, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01687; Angelica Image

Apparel, Summersville, MO: May

27, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01879; Toy Biz, Inc.,

Colorforms, Ramsey, NY: August

15, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01862; Louisiana Pacific

Corp., Dungannon, VA: June 30,

1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01788; Allegiance

Healthcare, Inc., Riverside, CA &

Temporary Workers of VIP

Temporary Services, Ontario, CA:

June 16, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01808; BASF Corp.,

Holyoke, MA: June 25, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01801; Kimberly-Clark

Corp., Winslow Plant, Winslow, ME:

July 7, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01856; Pro-Tech

Respirators, Inc., Div. of Bason

USA, Buchanan, MI: August 6,

1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01805 & A; Connie

Casuals Limited, Bangor, PA and

Pen Argyl, PA: July 3, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01698; Nu-Kote

Internatinoal, Inc., Ribbon Div.,

Rochester, NY: May 22, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01807; Levi Strauss and

Co., Goodyear Cutting Facility, El

Paso, TX: & Operating in the

following locations: A; Pellicano

Finishing Facility, El Paso, TX, B;

Lomaland Plant, El Paso, TX, C;

Eastside Plant, El Paso, TX, D;

Cypress Plant, El Paso, TX, E;

Airway Plant, El Paso, TX, F;

Amarillo Finishing Plant, Amarilo,

TX, G; Brownsville Plant,

Brownsville, TX, H; Harlingen

Plant, Harlingen, TX, I; San Angelo

Plant, San Angelo, TX, J; San

Antonio Plant, San Antonio, TX, K;

San Francisco Plant, San Francisco,

CA, L; Blue Ridge Plant, Blue Ridge,

GA, M; Valdosta Plant, Valdosta,

GA, N; Rosell Plant, Roswell, NM,

O; Albuquerque Plant,

Albuquerque, NM, P; Centerville

Plant, Centerville, TN, O; Knoxville

Sewing Plant, Knoxville, TN, R;

Knoxville Finishing Plant,

Knoxville, TN, S; Mountain City

Plant, Mountain City, TN, T; Powell

Plant, Powell, TN, U; Warsaw Plant,

Warsaw, VA, V; San Antonio Plant,

San Antonio, TX: July 9, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01794; Williamson

Products, Lawrenceville, PA: June

18, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01813; Magnetek, Inc.,

Huntington, IN: July 2, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01831; Precision Rotary

Instruments, Bridgewater Corners,

VT: July 9, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01846; Basler Elecric,

Pharr, TX: August 1, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01796; Impac

Manufacturing, Inc., Cypress, CA:

June 30, 1996.

NAFTA–TAA–01820; ACCO USA, Inc.,

Swingline Div., Long Island City,

NY: July 10, 1996.

I hereby certify that the

aforementioned determinations were

issued during the month of August,

1997. Copies of these determinations are

available for inspection in Room C–

4318, U.S. Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20210 during normal

business hours or will be mailed to

persons who write to the above address.

Dated: September 4, 1997.

Grant D. Beale,

Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 97–24661 Filed 9–16–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

[TA–W–31,327]

BJ Services Company, U.S.A.,

Including Former Employees of

Western Company of North America,

A/K/A Western Oceanic Services, Inc.,

A/K/A Nowsco Well Services Inc.,

Headquartered in Houston, Texas;

Amended Certification Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974 (19 USC 2273) the

Department of Labor issued a Notice of

Certification Regarding Eligibility to

Apply for Worker Adjustment

Assistance on October 13, 1995,

applicable to workers of BJ Services

Company, U.S.A., headquartered in

Houston, Texas. The notice was

published in the Federal Register on

October 27, 1995 (60 FR 55064). The

certification was amended on January

22, 1996 to include workers whose

wages were reported under the

predecessor tax accounts of Western

Company of North America and

Western Oceanic Services, Inc. The

notice of amendment was published in

the Federal Register on February 9,

1996 (61 JR 5034).

At the request of the State agency, the

Department reviewed the certification

for workers of the subject firm. The