alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 21.1


The following is a list of the Company's current subsidiaries, all of which are
wholly-owned:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidiary Name                                                  Organized Under The Laws Of
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                           <C>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ezenia International, Inc.                                       Massachusetts
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


The following are subsidiaries of Ezenia International, Inc. which is
wholly-owned:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidiary Name                                                  Organized Under The Laws Of
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                            <C>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ezenia Ltd.                                                      United Kingdom
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ezenia Latin America, Inc.                                       Massachusetts
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
### Geology and ground-water resources of south-central Nebraska, with special reference to the Platte River Valley between Chapman and Gothenburg

By: Alvin Leonard LugnLeland Keith Wenzel

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp779

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 8**                            (2633 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 10**                            (14856 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Placeholder for Video Submitted by Jason Bell (around page 322 of Hearing Transcript)
CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA - HQ - OW -2014-0598 DCN: SGE00724.A 17     THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE I T CONTAINS C ONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
# National EMS Week 2018 celebrated at DSCC

/ Published May 20, 2018
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The 2018 National EMS week is celebrated May 20 – 26.

EMS Week started out in 1974 as a week of recognition and public education. It used to be held in November and was known as Emergency Medical Services Week. In 1982, the observance moved to September and in 1992 the week moved to its current slot in May. These moves were made to separate EMS Week from Fire Prevention week in October.

This year's theme: "EMS Strong: Stronger Together" is a reminder that Emergency Medical Technicians and paramedics remain committed to the tough work that requires passion, purpose and heart to carry out well every day, often in difficult circumstances.

This year, each day has a unique theme highlighting EMS Strong: Stronger Together.

## Monday – Education

Did you know throughout the year, the emergency response team provides various training opportunities to associates and tenant organizations? These opportunities include informational booths and displays, briefings and CPR trainings.

The Fire Department will be celebrating the education theme by kicking-off the recognition week with a reading of the EMS week proclamation at the Firefighter and Police Memorial.

## Tuesday – Safety

It doesn’t matter how quickly EMS providers get to a scene – bystanders will always be there first. Having the proper education assists in the ability to assess a situation and take action.

Check out the story: A close call for a DLA Land and Maritime associate. Learn how the quick actions of a coworker helped save an associate’s life this year.

The Fire Department will be celebrating the safety theme during a shift breakfast reviewing recent EMS calls.

## Wednesday – EMS for Children Day

Raising awareness among youth is very important. This day is a great opportunity to get children familiar with emergency personnel and their vehicles as well as discussing when and how to contact emergency personnel.

The Fire Department will be celebrating the EMS theme for Children Day by visiting the Child Development Center on the installation. Children will take tours of the ambulance and Sparky the fire dog might make an appearance.

## Thursday – Save-A-Life

CPR is offered as part of the Defense Supply Center Columbus emergency service education and training opportunities available on the installation. Associates should register through LMS.

The Fire Department will be celebrating the Save-a-Life theme with an internal challenge between the police and fire department.

## Friday – EMS Recognition Day

EMS is an inherently risky job. On any given shift, EMS practitioners may be called to respond to emotionally charged, potentially life-threatening situations.

As EMS week comes to an end, it is important to take the time to recognize the great work that the DSCC emergency response team does on a daily basis.

Check out the spotlight on a few members of our emergency response team: Aaron Vance, Roger A. Komandt Jr., Dan Eshelman and Dylan Garrett.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2119 

To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant 

program through June 30, 2006, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 16, 2005 

Mr. BAUCUS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families 

block grant program through June 30, 2006, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TANF and Related 

5 Programs Extension Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 2119 IS 

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR 

2 NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF), TRANSITIONAL 

3 MEDICAL ASSISTANCE (TMA), AND ABSTI4 NENCE PROGRAMS THROUGH JUNE 30, 2006. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Activities authorized by part A of 

6 title IV of the Social Security Act, and by sections 510, 

7 1108(b), and 1925 of such Act, shall continue through 

8 June 30, 2006, in the manner authorized for fiscal year 

9 2005, notwithstanding section 1902(e)(1)(A) of such Act, 

10 and out of any money in the Treasury of the United States 

11 not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby appropriated 

12 such sums as may be necessary for such purpose. Grants 

13 and payments may be made pursuant to this authority on 

14 a quarterly basis through the third quarter of fiscal year 

15 2006 at the level provided for such activities for each cor16 responding quarter of fiscal year 2005. 

17 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

18 403(a)(3)(H)(ii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

19 603(a)(3)(H)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 

20 2005’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2006’’. 

21 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL RANDOM SAMPLE 

22 STUDY OF CHILD WELFARE AND CHILD WEL23 FARE WAIVER AUTHORITY THROUGH JUNE 

24 30, 2006. 

25 Activities authorized by sections 429A and 1130(a) 

26 of the Social Security Act shall continue through June 30, 
3 

•S 2119 IS 

1 2006, in the manner authorized for fiscal year 2005, and 

2 out of any money in the Treasury of the United States 

3 not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby appropriated 

4 such sums as may be necessary for such purpose. Grants 

5 and payments may be made pursuant to this authority on 

6 a quarterly basis through the third quarter of fiscal year 

7 2006 at the level provided for such activities for each cor8 responding quarter of fiscal year 2005. 

Æ
1

 This Court suspended activity in this appeal in accordance with the automatic stay. See 11

U.S.C.A. § 362 (West Supp. 2004);see also Tex. R. App. P. 8. We reinstate the appeal for purposes

of dismissal. The bankruptcy trustee is the representative of the estate, with exclusive standing to

assert a claim. 11 U.S.C.A. § 323(a) (West Supp. 2004); Carter v. Carter, 21 S.W.3d 441, 443 (Tex.

App.—San Antonio 2000, no pet.). When an action is already pending, a trustee may (1) assume

prosecution of the action; (2) consent to the debtor’s continued prosecution of the action for the

trustee’s benefit, or (3) decline to prosecute the action if it appearsto be fruitless. Id.; Fed. R. Bankr.

6009. Here the trustee appears to have assumed prosecution of the action and settled it.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00509-CV

The Heep Homestead and Hatsy Heep Shaffer, Appellants

v.

Jennifer L. Brannon, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN103418, HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of David E. Shaffer and Harriet “Hatsy” Heep

Shaffer1has notified the court that the Estate and appellee Jennifer L. Brannon have settled the cause
2

and the parties move to dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex.

R. App. P. 42.1.

 

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Kidd and B. A. Smith

Dismissed

Filed: August 12, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 213 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.213

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain Federal land 
                    to Rio Arriba County, New Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rio Arriba County Land Conveyance 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
        (1) County.--The term ``County'' means the County of Rio 
    Arriba, New Mexico.
        (2) Map.--The term ``map'' means the map entitled ``Alcalde 
    Proposed Land Transfer'' and dated September 23, 2004.
        (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of 
    the Interior.

SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF LAND TO RIO ARRIBA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO.

    (a) In General.--Subject to valid existing rights, the Secretary 
shall convey to the County, without consideration, all right, title, 
and interest of the United States in and to the land (including any 
improvements to the land) described in subsection (b).
    (b) Description of Land.--The land referred to in subsection (a) 
consists of approximately 171 acres of land located on the Sebastian 
Martin Land Grant in the vicinity of Alcalde, Rio Arriba County, New 
Mexico, as depicted on the map.
    (c) Reversion.--If any portion of the land conveyed under 
subsection (a) ceases to be used for public purposes the land shall, at 
the option of the Secretary, revert to the United States.
    (d) Conditions on Sales.--If the County sells any portion of the 
land conveyed to the County under subsection (a)--
        (1) the amount of consideration for the sale shall reflect fair 
    market value, as determined by an appraisal; and
        (2) the County shall pay to the Secretary an amount equal to 
    the gross proceeds of the sale, for use by the Director of the 
    Bureau of Land Management in the State of New Mexico, without 
    further appropriation.
    (e) Costs.--The County shall pay any costs associated with the 
conveyance of land under subsection (a).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 26, 2020 No. 04-20-00360-CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.B.G., A.N.G., CHILDREN From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-467 Honorable Kelley Kimble, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R A copy of appellant’s notice of appeal was filed in this court on July 16, 2020. On July 16, 2020, this court informed appellant in writing that (1) a filing fee of $205 and (2) an amended notice of appeal were due no later than July 31, 2020. The filing fee has not been paid and our record contains no evidence that appellant is excused by statute or rule from paying the filing fee. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 20. Also, an amended notice of appeal has not been filed. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing no later than September 10, 2020 that either: (1) the filing fee has been paid; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the filing fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5, 42.3(c). Appellant is also ORDERED to file an amended notice of appeal no later than September 10, 2020. All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending the payment of the filing fee.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of August, 2020.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 20, 2010 

1213 

Order 

 

December 20, 2010 

141669 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141669 

 COA: 290834 

Eaton CC: 08-020234-FC 

WILLIE RICH CHAPPELL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 1, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Adeliah H. HARPER, Appellant, v. The FIRST NATIONAL BANK AT ORLANDO, as Guardian of the Estate of Mary A. Shearn, Incompetent, and Edward H. Hurt, Appellees.

No. 69-171.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 19, 1969.

Robert Roth and Eli H. Subin, of Roth, Segal & Levine, Orlando, for appellant.

*121H. M. Voorhis and J. R. Wells, of Ma-guire, Voorhis & Wells, Orlando, for appel-lee bank.

Heskin A. Whittaker of Whittaker, Pyle & Wood, Orlando, for appellee Hurt.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant-plaintiff, Adeliah H. Harper, appeals a final order of dismissal with prejudice entered by the court in favor of the defendants, The First National Bank at Orlando, as Guardian of the Estate of Mary A. Shearn, Incompetent, and Edward H. Hurt, dismissing plaintiff’s amended complaint with prejudice in a cause of action seeking declaratory relief.

Upon careful consideration of the record it affirmatively appears there is no present justiciable issue for determination. Accordingly, the final order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 129445 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129445 COA: 244245 Wayne CC: 02-001674 PONCIETTA ADRIENNE EARLE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 24, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0221 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2006

Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.5

March 5, 2001

Mr. Frank ten Brink
Waste Systems, Inc.
28161 N. Keith Drive
Lake Forest, Illinois 60045


VIA FACSIMILE: (847) 367-9462


Dear Mr. Ten Brink:

     As the Amended and Restated Secured Promissory Note dated October 1, 1998
in the principle amount of $5,629,378.97, payable to Waste Systems, Inc. ("WSI")
has matured, we are requesting to renegotiate and extend the note under the
following terms to June 30, 2001.

Proposed Terms:

a)   Maturity. The Note will July 1, 2001 and will be renewed on a quarterly
     basis.

b)   Interest Rate Wall Street Journal "Money Rates" (Southwestern Edition)
     Prime Rate plus 2.5% per annum not to exceed 13%.

c)   Interest Payments. Interest payable quarterly in arrears on the first day
     of the succeeding quarter with the first payment due April 1, 2001.

d)   Financial Covenant. The Second Amended and Restated Note will contain a
     minimum EBITDA covenant of $1,500,000 for the six months ending June 30,
     2001. Such covenant will be measured on a trailing six months basis. If the
     minimum EBITDA goal is not obtained warrants will issued based on a market
     price of $0.16 (market price as of December 20, 2000) The Note as amended
     will not contain a minimum net income covenant nor a minimum shareholder
     equity covenant currently contained in the Note subparagraph (h) and (I) on
     page 3 of the 3CI Note.


<PAGE>


Mr. Frank ten Brink
March 5, 2001
Page 2


(e)  Warrants. If minimum EBITDA goal is not obtained warrants will issued based
     on a market price of $0.16 (market price as of December 20, 2000).

(f)  Confirmation of Existing Liens. The Company will ratify and confirm all
     existing liens in favor of WSI securing the Note.

(g)  Payment of WSI Fees and Expenses. The Company shall pay all of WSI's
     reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred by it in connection with the
     negotiation and documentation of the Proposed Note and related documents
     and instruments.

(h)  Waiver of Existing Defaults. WSI will waive, if applicable, all existing
     events of default under the Note through January 1, 2001.

Please indicate your acceptance by signing and faxing back to me.

Yours truly,

/s/ Curtis W. Crane
Curtis W. Crane
Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Frank J.M. ten Brink
Frank J.M. ten Brink
Vice President
Waste Systems, Inc.
July 22, 2011

Dear Mr. McGraw: Referenc e your correspondence dated March 25, 2011 and in connection with Life Flight recent hoist training event I find that one of the specified segments that defines a hoist operation is problematic during training. Th e operational segment that is described as: “repositioning flight to the nearest suitable landing zone to land the rotorcraft and load the rescue target in the rotorcraft”, adds significant time and operational costs to training with little benefit toward proficiency related to the critical pilot skill sets necessary to conduct safe and effective hoist operations. Lowering and lifting loads is performed multiple times in almost every phase of hoist training. Landing, loading and departing are tasks that are performed multiple time s on a daily basis. Adding this phase to hoist training is burdensome and is a skill set that is accomplished and evaluated in a number of arenas. Respectfully request that this phase/operational segment be deleted from the definit ion of a “Hoist Operation” for the purposes of currency (20 separate hoist operations ). Thank you in advance for your favorable consideration of this request. Sincerely,

William E. Butts Director of Aviation Operations Intermountain Life Flight
log Fish BAF = 2.70 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90-99 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = da-wk Sorption to soils/sediments = strong Volatilization half-life from a standard river = 2 hrs Volatilization half-life from a standard lake = 7 da Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 1.7 hr via OH radical Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 2.1 hr via ozone PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor all routes (analogs). There is concern for chemical pneumonia if inhaled by analogy . Low moderate concern.

Ecotox :

Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value 0.001

daphnid

_ chronic value 0.002

algal

_ chronic value 0.004

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge _ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for SAR chemical class = MW 144; log Kow = 7.45 (EPI); liquid; S = 0.012 mg/L at 20 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) Acute *Concentration of Concern ( p pb) Chronic 1

SARs SAR Class TSCA New Chemcial Category

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Fate assessor: D. Lynch Ecotox assessor: Health assessor:
Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ Document 351 Filed 02/22/06 Page 1 of 1