Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 21 / Friday, January 31, 1997 / Notices 4769

1Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and

Order are available from the Commission’s Public

Reference Branch, H–130, 6th Street & Pennsylvania

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.

1Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and

Order are available from the Commission’s Public

Reference Branch, H–130, 6th Street & Pennsylvania

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.

1Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and

Order are available from the Commission’s Public

Reference Branch, H–130, 6th Street & Pennsylvania

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.

[Dkt. C–3657]

Mrs. Fields Cookies, Inc.; Prohibited

Trade Practices, and Affirmative

Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged

violations of federal law prohibiting

unfair or deceptive acts or practices and

unfair methods of competition, this

consent order prohibits, among other

things, the Utah-based corporation from

misrepresenting the fat, saturated fat,

cholesterol or caloric content of baked

food products.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued May

13, 1996.1

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Phoebe Morse, Federal Trade

Commission, Boston Regional Office,

101 Merrimac Street, Suite 810, Boston,

MA. 02114–4719. (617)424–5960.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

Wednesday, March 6, 1996, there was

published in the Federal Register, 61 FR

8939, a proposed consent agreement

with analysis In the Matter of Mrs.

Fields Cookies, Inc., for the purpose of

soliciting public comment. Interested

parties were given sixty (60) days in

which to submit comments, suggestions

or objections regarding the proposed

form of the order. No comments having

been received, the Commission has

ordered the issuance of the complaint in

the form contemplated by the

agreement, made its jurisdictional

findings and entered an order to cease

and desist, as set forth in the proposed

consent agreement, in disposition of this

proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets

or applies sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended;

15 U.S.C. 45, 52)

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–2442 Filed 1–30–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750–01–M

[Dkt. C–3660]

NW Ayer, Inc.; Prohibited Trade

Practices, and Affirmative Corrective

Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged

violations of federal law prohibiting

unfair or deceptive acts or practices and

unfair methods of competition., this

consent prohibits, among other things,

the New York-based advertising agency

from misrepresenting the absolute or

comparative amount of cholesterol, total

fat, saturated fat, or any other fatty acid

in eggs or in any meat, dairy, or poultry

product, and from misrepresenting the

existence or results of any test or study.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued May

31, 1996.1

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Theodore Hoppock, FTC/S–4002,

Washington, D.C. 20580. (202) 326–

3087.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

Tuesday, March 26, 1996, there was

published in the Federal Register, 61 FR

13202, a proposed consent agreement

with analysis In the Matter of NW Ayer,

Inc., for the purpose of soliciting public

comment. Interested parties were given

sixty (60) days in which to submit

comments, suggestions or objections

regarding the proposed form of the

order.

No comments having been received,

the Commission has ordered the

issuance of the complaint in the form

contemplated by the agreement, made

its jurisdictional findings and entered

an order to cease and desist, as set forth

in the proposed consent agreement, in

disposition of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets

or applies sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended;

15 U.S.C. 45, 52)

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–2443 Filed 1–30–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750–01–M

[Dkt. C–3671]

Rick A. Rahim; Prohibited Trade

Practices, and Affirmative Corrective

Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent Order.

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged

violations of federal law prohibiting

unfair or deceptive acts or practices and

unfair methods of competition, this

consent order prohibits, among other

things, a Virginia-based individual

doing business as NBDC Credit

Resource Publishing from

misrepresenting, in advertisements—via

a computer communications network, or

by any other means—for a credit repair

product, the legality of any credit repair

product, and requires the respondent to

disclose that the program may violate

federal criminal laws.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued June

12, 1996.1

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nicholas Franczyk, Federal Trade

Commission, Chicago Regional Office,

55 East Monroe St., Suite 1860, Chicago,

IL. 60603. (312) 353–8156.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On

Monday, April 1, 1996, there was

published in the Federal Register, 61 FR

14318, a proposed consent agreement

with analysis In the Matter of Rick A.

Rahim, for the purpose of soliciting

public comment. Interested parties were

given sixty (60) days in which to submit

comments, suggestions or objections

regarding the proposed form of the

order.

No comments having been received,

the Commission has ordered the

issuance of the complaint in the form

contemplated by the agreement, made

its jurisdictional findings and entered

an order to cease and desist, as set forth

in the proposed consent agreement, in

disposition of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets

or applies sec. 5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended;

15 U.S.C. 45))

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary

[FR Doc. 97–2445 Filed 1–30–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750–01–M

[Docket No. C–3664]

RxCare of Tennessee, Inc., et al.;

Prohibited Trade Practices, and

Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged

violations of federal law prohibiting

unfair or deceptive acts or practices and

unfair methods of competition this

consent order prohibits, among other

things, a Tennessee-based pharmacy

service administrative organization and

an unincorporated trade association

from: entering into, maintaining, or

enforcing a ‘‘most favored nations’’

clause in any participation agreement

with any pharmacy firm; auditing any

pharmacy firm for the purpose of

enforcing a ‘‘most favored nations’’

clause; or inducing, suggesting, urging,

encouraging, or assisting any person or

entity to take any action in violation of

this order.