alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W.
Andre, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:


     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date: December 24, 2008




                                        By: /s/ PAUL W. ANDRE
                                            ___________________________
                                                Paul W. Andre
                                                Treasurer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Jack



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 19, 2015

N o. 04

- 13

- 00897

- CV

Lynn Noble HAWTHORNE a/k/a Lynn Hawthorne,

Appellant

v.

Jack GUENTHER

, Appellee

From the 285th Judicial D istrict Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 20197

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Motion for Rehearing and

Motion for En Banc Reconsideration is GRANTED. The deadline is extended to March 6, 2015.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of February, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2177 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24624]



[[Page 48831]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-37-001]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

September 11, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 8, 1997, Northwest Pipeline 
Corporation (Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff the following tariff sheets, to become effective October 1, 
1997:

Third Revised Volume No. 1

Substitute Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 5

Original Volume No. 2

Substitute Twenty-Second Revised Sheet No. 2.2

    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to update 
Northwest's tariff to reflect the Annual Charge Adjustment (ACA) factor 
to be effective for the twelve-month period beginning October 1, 1997. 
Northwest states that its new ACA factor will be 0.22 cents per Dth, an 
increase of 0.02 cents per Dth from its current ACA factor.
    Northwest states that on August 18, 1997 it submitted a tariff 
filing in Docket No. TM98-1-37-000 to reflect a 0.21 cents per Dth ACA 
factor to be effective for the twelve-month period beginning October 1, 
1997. The 0.21 cents per Dth factor was based on the Commission's 
August 1, 1997 Statement of Annual Charges. However, on August 20, 
1997, the Commission issued a correction of the ACA unit charge from 
0.21 cents per Dth to 0.22 cents per Dth. Accordingly, Northwest states 
that it is requesting to withdraw its August 18, 1997 filing and is 
submitting the instant filing to reflect the revised ACA factor.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24624 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MAHENDRA KUMAR TRIVEDI, : Civil Action No. 4:11-CV-2390

TRIVEDI FOUNDATION, :

TRIVEDI MASTER WELLNESS, :

LLC, :

Plaintiffs, : (Judge Brann)

:

v. :

:

TANIA M. SLAWECKI, :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, THEREFORE, THIS 1st DAY OF DECEMBER 2015, in

accordance with the memorandum issued this date IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

THAT:

1. Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Counterclaims is

DENIED without prejudice. May 15, 2015, ECF No. 116. 

2. The parties cross motions for summary judgment are DENIED without

prejudice. April 3, 2015, ECF Nos. 114 and 115. 

3. The cross-claim is DISMISSED as this Court lacks subject matter

jurisdiction. 

1

Case 4:11-cv-02390-MWB Document 127 Filed 12/01/15 Page 1 of 2
4. The clerk is directed to close the case file. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

2

Case 4:11-cv-02390-MWB Document 127 Filed 12/01/15 Page 2 of 2
#### Beatrice Watkins YOUNG v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 46245.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 22, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 15, 1971.

Charles S. Wright, Jackson, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by John M. Kinard, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

ETHRIDGE, Chief Justice.

Beatrice Watkins Young, appellant, was convicted in the Circuit Court for the First Judicial District of Hinds County of the unlawful sale of marijuana.

The evidence for the state amply supports the conviction. Townsend, Narcotics Investigator for the State Highway Patrol, went to a residence in Jackson and pur*27chased from defendant two brown envelopes containing marijuana. Another narcotics agent testified that he had parked his car near defendant’s house, observed Townsend entering and leaving the house, and recognized defendant who was on the porch as Townsend was leaving. A toxicologist identified the substance as marijuana. The only witness for the defense was defendant’s ex-husband, who testified that defendant was sick that day, he had spent most of the day at her house, he did not see Townsend, and there were two other women in the house part of the time/

The indictment charged that on March 6, 1969, defendant wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously sold marijuana contrary to the statute. This indictment charged the essentials of the offense. It was not necessary to aver the name of the person who purchased the marijuana. *Cf.*Lea v. State, 64 Miss. 201, 1 So. 51 (1886) (sale of intoxicating liquor).

An informer apparently advised the police officers that they could purchase marijuana from defendant. The circuit court overruled defendant’s motion for disclosure of the informer’s identity. Ordinarily, disclosure of the identity of an informer, who is not a material witness to the guilt or innocence of the accused, is within the sound discretion of the trial court. Strode v. State, 231 So.2d 779 (Miss.1970). On the other hand, where the informer is an actual participant in the alleged crime, the accused is entitled to know who he is. Roviaro v. U. S., 353 U.S. 53, 77 S.Ct. 623, 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957). However, in the instant case the evidence shows that the informer was not an active participant or eyewitness to the offense. The trial court offered defendant’s counsel an opportunity to furnish proof as to whether the informer was a participant, but no such evidence was tendered.

Affirmed.

PATTERSON, INZER, SMITH and ROBERTSON, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Paivis, Corp. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory L. Bauer,
      Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated:
                August 20, 2007
              
              /s/
                Gregory Bauer
              ---------------------------------------
              Gregory
                Bauer
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              and
                Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit
32
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 
 
 
 The
undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Oconee Financial Corporation (the
      “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”)
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Dated:
      May 13, 2005
    /s/
      B. Amrey Harden
      B. Amrey Harden
      Chief
      Executive OfficerDated:
      May 13, 2005
    /s/
      Jerry K.
      Wages
      Jerry K. Wages
      Chief
      Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 11.1 - COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
(in thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                ------------------------------
                                                  1999        1998       1997
                                                --------    --------   --------
<S>                                             <C>         <C>        <C>
Net loss applicable to common
 stockholders:
 Continuing operations                          $ (2,583)   $ (2,094)  $ (3,907)
 Discontinued operations                              --      (1,719)       217
                                                --------    --------   --------
  Net loss applicable to common stockholders    $ (2,583)   $ (3,813)  $ (3,690)
                                                ========    ========   ========

Weighted average common shares outstanding:       11,849      11,196     11,066
Common share equivalents                              --          --         --
                                                --------    --------   --------
Weighted average common shares and common
share equivalents (if dilutive) outstanding       11,849      11,196     11,066
                                                ========    ========   ========

Net loss per common share:
 Basic and diluted:
  Continuing operations                         $  (0.22)   $  (0.19)  $  (0.35)
  Discontinued operations                             --       (0.15)      0.02
                                                --------    --------   --------
   Net loss from continuing operations          $  (0.22)   $  (0.34)  $  (0.33)
                                                ========    ========   ========
</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2127 

To redesignate the Mason Neck National Wildlife Refuge in the State of 

Virginia as the ‘‘Elizabeth Hartwell Mason Neck National Wildlife Refuge’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 16, 2005 

Mr. ALLEN (for himself and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Mason Neck National Wildlife Refuge 

in the State of Virginia as the ‘‘Elizabeth Hartwell 

Mason Neck National Wildlife Refuge’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIZABETH HARTWELL MASON NECK NA4 TIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE. 

5 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The Mason Neck National 

6 Wildlife Refuge in the State of Virginia shall be known 

7 and designated as the ‘‘Elizabeth Hartwell Mason Neck 

8 National Wildlife Refuge’’. 
2 

•S 2127 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the refuge referred to in subsection (a) shall be 

4 deemed to be a reference to the Elizabeth Hartwell Mason 

5 Neck National Wildlife Refuge. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47477-47478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23818]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP91-143-043]


Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership; Notice of 
Revenue Sharing Report--Past Period Charges

September 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 27, 1997, Great Lakes Gas Transmission 
Limited Partnership (Great Lakes) filed its Fourth Interruptible/
Overrun (I/O) Revenue Sharing Report related to past period charges 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission), in 
accordance with the Stipulation and Agreement (Settlement) filed on 
September 24, 1992, and approved by the Commission's February 3, 1993 
order issued in Docket No. RP91-143-000, et al.
    Great Lakes states that this report was prepared and submitted in 
accordance with Article IV of the Settlement, as modified by Commission 
order issued in Great Lakes' restructuring proceeding in Docket No. 
RS92-63 on October 1, 1993. This fourth report reflects application of 
the revenue sharing mechanism and further remittances made to firm 
shippers for I/O revenue related to past period charges collected from 
I/O shippers resulting from the return to rolled-in pricing for the 
period November 1, 1991 through September 30, 1995. Such remittances 
were made

[[Page 47478]]

to Great Lakes' firm shippers on July 30, 1997.
    Great Lakes states that copies of this fourth report were sent to 
its firm customers, parties to this proceeding and the Public Service 
Commissions of the States of Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Section 385.214 and Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must 
be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Commission's Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23818 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-95536) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, 1995 Stock
Plan, 1995 Stock Purchase Plan and 1995 Director Option Plan of Netscape
Communications Corporation, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-99198) pertaining to the 1993 Incentive Stock Plan of Collabra Software,
Inc., in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-4222) pertaining to the
1993 Stock Option Plan of InSoft, Inc., and in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-4478) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Plan of Netcode Corporation, of
our report dated January 26, 1996, except for Note 2, as to which the date is
May 28, 1996, with respect to the supplemental consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Netscape Communications Corporation included in this Amendment
No. 2 to the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 1995.
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Palo Alto, California
October 30, 1996
#### Nathaniel FLOWERS, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-205.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 17, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### Ex parte Donald Harris BLACK, Jr.

77-34.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 10, 1977.

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER, AL-MON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
J~ tED ST,qT ~ S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 0 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

7- Q

o =

~ "PT, PADj EG"

Allr+ 17 ,010 OFFICEOF htV V / I AIR AND RADIATION Donald C. Gadbury Manager, National TRU Program Carlsbad Field Office U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090

Dcar Mr. Gadbury:

On October 21, 2009, the Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO) requested that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approve three remote-handled (RH) waste streams at Idaho national Laboratory (INL) as Tier 1 changes. On February 1, 2010, EPA approved two of the three RH waste streams as a Tier 1 change (EPA Docket No. A-98-49; I1-A4-122). Thisapproval is for the third retrievably stored, RH transuranic (TRU) debris waste stream IDINTEC-RH. As a result, INL may dispose of this waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). The enclosed report (EPA Docket No. A-98-49; II-A4-129) supports EPA's approval decision. As a part of this review, EPA also evaluated and approves the following: an RH waste sampling process implemented at the Argonne National Laboratory-East (ANL-E) and a radiochemical analysis procedure for RH waste implemented at the INL.The Central Characterization Project (CCP) characterized this waste using remotehandled waste characterization processes approved by EPA in February 2007. In addition, theCCP used sampling and radiochemical analysis processes similar to those implemented at ANLE and INL, respectively. EPA determined that the procedures and processes used by INL-CCP staff for characterizing this waste were adequate. As a result of our evaluation, no changes to the tiering table are necessary. The tiering table (revised May 12, 2010), contained in the EPA report(EPA Docket No: A-98-49, II-A4-126), supporting an approval of the INL RH waste stream (IDMFC-S5400-RH), continues to apply to all RH waste streams at INL. If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462 or Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422.

Sincerely,



# ~ 

# J

~ PXtlA,4

~~ Tom Peake, Director Center for Waste Management and Regulations

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable - Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30`o Postconsurner)Enclosure

cc: Electronic Distribution Christine Gelles, DOE EM Alton Harris, DOE EM David Moody, CBFO Vernon Daub, CBFO Ava Holland, CBFO QA J R Stroble, CBFO Courtland Fesmire, CBFO Martin Navarrete, CBFO QA Dennis Miehls, CBFO QA Jerry Wells, DOE ID D K Ploetz, WTS-CCP Mike Sensibaugh, WTS-CCP Mark Pearcy, WTS-CCP Allison Pangie, CTAC Wayne Ledford, CTAC Steve Zappe, NMED EPA Region 10
EXHIBIT 23.1




            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
LeCroy Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-129490, 333-120656, 333-113271, 333-03144 and 333-91833) on Form S-8,
(Nos. 333-119730, 333-46418, 333-43690, 333-88239, 333-43699, 333-37269 and
333-22117) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-112630 and 333-64848) on Form S-3/A of
LeCroy Corporation of our reports dated September 13, 2006, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of LeCroy Corporation and subsidiaries as of June
30, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended June 30, 2006, and the related financial
statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006 and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006, which reports
appear in the June 30, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of LeCroy Corporation.




/s/ KPMG LLP



Short Hills, New Jersey
September 13, 2006