alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 181 (Thursday, September 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24780]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP80-556-001]


Great River Gas Company; Notice of Application To Amend Service 
Area Determination

September 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 4, 1997, Great River Gas Company 
(Great River) filed an application to amend the authorization it 
received in Docket No. CP80-556-000 when it was granted a service area 
determination. Great River wants to amend its Section 7(f) service area 
determination by substituting the name of Atmos Energy Corporation 
(Atmos), in place of Great River, as the holder of the determination.
    Great River explains that its Section 7(f) service area 
determination covers its operations as a public utility engaged in the 
sale, storage, and distribution of natural gas to customers in two 
contiguous, but unconnected, service areas in Iowa and Missouri. The 
determination order authorized Great River to construct a two-mile, 6-
inch pipeline interconnecting its separate facilities in Iowa and 
Missouri.
    Great River states that on March 10, 1989, United Cities Gas 
Company (United Cities) acquired all the stock of Great River and 
assumed Great River's status in all FERC proceedings. Great River 
asserts that since 1989, its properties have been operated as part of a 
division of United Cities.
    Great River relates that on July 31, 1997, United Cities and Atmos 
merged, and that the merged company bears the name Atmos Energy 
Corporation. Therefore, Great River would like its Section 7(f) service 
area determination amended to reflect the name of Atmos as the holder 
of the determination.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said application should on or before September 25, 1997, 
file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the 
requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.214 and 385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be 
considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken but 
will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party in any proceeding herein must file a 
motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's rules. Copies 
of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24780 Filed 9-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
### RECEIVED



### OPPT CBIC



## 2012 AUG 28 AH 6: 

## 34



# SEP 12 

# 20\2.

August 22, 2012

Director, Chemical Control Division

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room4146

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20004



### Re: EPA- HQ- OPPT- 2003- 0012 DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts

Chambers Works

Deepwater, NJ 08023



### DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100

PFOA Data Submittal- Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples

July 2012 Sample Data

Dear Chemical Control Division:

Attached please find a summary of PFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works

weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A in July 2012. In accordance with the

current site NJPDES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 2011), these results are provided

to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic discharge monitoring reports. Per your request, the

enclosures include two paper and two electronic copies of the analytical results from this

monitoring period.

Sincerely,



## ...

Jacques Monteux

Unit Manager-Site Manufacturing Systems

DuPont Chambers Works

JM/clc

Enclosures 

### CONTAINS NO CBICopy to:

/Document Control Office

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room6428

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only)

Principal Environmental Engineer

NJDEP Division of Water Quality

Bureau of Point Source Permitting- Region 2

401 E. State Street

P.O. Box029

Trenton, NJ 08625-0029AnalytePFOASampleIDDateTop(ft)Total(T)/Bottom(ft)unitsDiss.(D)Duplicate#ug/LTSummaryofAnalyticalResults662-July2012662-GRAB 662-GRAB662-GRAB662-GRAB 662-GRAB7/2/127/9/127/16/12 7/23/12 7/30/120000000000111113.381.751.911.42 1.58PFOA=PerfluorooctanoicAcidug/L=microgramsperLiterug/L=microgramsperliterorpartsperbillion(ppb)NO=notdetected(shownas<LOO)NO-notquantifiable(shownas<LOQ)NO<LOO<NO<LOQLOO=limitofdetection=0.0723ug/LLOQ-limitofquantification=0.100ug/LSampleswereanalyzedbyCriticalPathServicesLLC.Reportedresultsrepresentasingleanalysis,exceptforthesamplecollectedon7/23/12.Acceptableprecisionwasobtainedandthereportedresultforthesamplecollectedon7/23/12representstheaverageoflabduplicateresults.TheNJOEPlabcertificationnumberforCriticalPathServicesLLCisPA072.<andNO=NondetectatstatedreportinglimitPage1of1cwk662grabresultsjui12:Sheet18/22/201212:45PM
EXHIBIT  32.01

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of AvStar Aviation Group, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"), the
undersigned,  in  the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  his  knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.     The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May  16,  2011                    /s/  Clayton  I.  Gamber
                                          ------------------------
                                          Clayton  I.  Gamber,
                                          Chief  Executive  Officer
|   | (1) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Oconee Financial Corporation (the      “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”)      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      May 15, 2009 |  /s/      B. Amrey Harden                                                       B.      Amrey HardenChief      Executive Officer   |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| Dated:      May 15, 2009 | /s/        Steven A. Rogers                                                      Steven      A. RogersChief      Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 2
                    MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION

I, Richard H. Casper, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
DOLPHIN PRODUCTIONS, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statement were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-
14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this quarterly report (the"Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: August 13, 2004                      /s/ Richard H. Casper


                                           ----------------------------
                                           Richard. H. Casper, President
                                           and Principal Executive Officer
### Compilation of records of surface waters of the United States, October 1950 to September 1960, part 4. St. Lawrence River basin

By: E. L. Hendricks

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1727

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### SMIRCH v. REX FISHERIES, INC.

No. 38617.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
#### John A. FOUNTAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 76-1980, 77-222.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 20, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Harry M. Hipler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*609DAKAN, STEPHEN L., Associate Judge.

Appellant seeks to overturn his conviction and sentence for robbery and carrying a firearm in the commission of the robbery. He has raised several points on appeal, only one of which we find has merit.

The theory of the State’s case against Appellant was that he was a principal or “aider and abettor” in the crime. He requested the court to instruct the jury as to the lesser offenses of aggravated assault and assault. The trial court refused to give those requested instructions, but did instruct the jury as to the included offenses of attempted armed robbery, robbery, grand larceny and petit larceny.

There is no question that the offenses of aggravated assault and assault are lesser-included offenses of the main charge. The Appellee contends failure to give instructions as to these offenses is harmless error. In the recent case of *Lomax v. State,*345 So.2d 719 (Fla.1977), the Supreme Court of Florida held that when failure to instruct on a lesser-included offense constitutes error, the harmless error doctrine cannot be invoked. This decision had not been rendered at the time of trial.

We find no legal significance in the fact that Appellant was charged as a principal. Since the failure to instruct the jury on the offenses of aggravated assault and assault was error, we reverse on the authority of *Lomax v. State,*supra.

Reversed for a new trial in accordance with this opinion.

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.
Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

and Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-46427

I, Stephen A. Ballas, the principal executive officer of Ministry Partners Investment Corporation, certify that:

	1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Ministry Partners Investment Corporation; 

	2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

	3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

	4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

	(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

	(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and 

	(c) presented in this annual report or conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

	5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

	(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and 

	(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 

	6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

Dated: March 25, 2003

									/s/ Stephen A. Ballas
									Stephen A. Ballas

									Principal Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Brodereck Hearne v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-12-00243-CR

Trial court case number: 1330405

Trial court: 230th District Court of Harris County, Texas

On December 16, 2011, appellant pleaded guilty to the felony offense of injury to a child 

without an agreed recommendation on punishment. On February 24, 2012, the trial court 

adjudicated appellant guilty and imposed a sentence of confinement in the Institutional Division 

of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for fifteen years. Appellant’s court-appointed 

counsel, Connie Williams, timely filed a notice of appeal along with a motion to withdraw and a 

request for a free record and court-appointed counsel on appeal. The trial court granted the 

motion to withdraw and determined that appellant was entitled to a free record and courtappointed counsel on appeal. However, the record contains no appointment of counsel on 

appeal, and no counsel has appeared on behalf of appellant in this case. If a defendant in a 

criminal case is indigent, he is entitled to court-appointed counsel for both the trial of the cause 

and an appeal to a court of appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 1.051(a), (c), (d)(1) 

(West Supp. 2011). 

Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remove it from this Court’s active docket. We 

direct the trial court to enter a written order appointing appellant counsel on appeal, containing 

counsel’s name, state bar number, address, and phone number. The order must be a separate 

written order, and not a docket sheet, because a docket sheet may not be considered by this 

Court. See Rush v. Barrios, 56 S.W.3d 88, 95 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. 

denied) (an appellate court may not consider docket entries since they are only made for the 

clerk’s convenience and are usually unreliable).

The written order of the trial court appointing counsel on appeal shall be included in a 

supplemental clerk’s record and sent to this Court within 15 days of the date of this order. 
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active 

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental 

clerk’s record containing the trial court’s written order appointing counsel is filed in this Court. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:/s/ Justice Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 20, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24894]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[MT-926-07-1420-00]


Montana: Filing of Plats of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Montana State Office, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the following described land are 
scheduled to be officially filed in the Montana State Office, Billings, 
Montana, thirty (30) days from the date of this publication.

Principal Meridian, Montana

T. 27 N., R. 46 E.

    The plat, representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
south boundary, subdivisional lines, subdivision of sections 29, 33, 
34, and the adjusted original meanders of the former left bank of 
the Missouri River, downstream, through sections 33 and 34, and the 
subdivision of sections 33 and 34, and the survey of a division of 
accretion line, the new meanders of the left bank of the Missouri 
River, downstream, through sections 33 and 34, and certain division 
of accretion lines in sections 33 and 34, Township 27 North, Range 
46 East, Principal Meridian, Montana, was accepted February 14, 
1997.

T. 27 N., R. 50 E.

    The plat, representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
subdivisional lines, the adjusted original meanders of the former 
left bank of the Missouri River, downstream, through section 23, and 
the subdivision of section lines in section 23, and the subdivision 
of section 23, the survey of the meanders of the present left bank 
of the Missouri River, downstream, through section 23, and a certain 
division of accretion line, Township 27 North, Range 50 East, 
Principal Meridian, Montana, was accepted May 1, 1997. These surveys 
were executed at the request of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, 
Billings Area Office, and were necessary to establish allotment 
boundaries. A copy of the preceding described plats will be 
immediately placed in the open files and will be available to the 
public as a matter of information.
    If a protest against these surveys, as shown on these plats, is 
received prior to the date of the official filings, the filings will 
be stayed pending consideration of the protests. These particular 
plats will not be officially filed until the day after all protests 
have been accepted or dismissed and become final or appeals from the 
dismissal affirmed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 222 North 
32nd Street, P.O. Box 36800, Billings, Montana 59107-6800.

    Dated: September 11, 1997.
Daniel T. Mates,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Resources,
[FR Doc. 97-24894 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P