alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  I, Dempsey Mork, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report for the period ended September 30, 2009 on Form 10-Q of China Holdings, Inc.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Nov. 18, 2009  /s/ Dempsey Mork Dempsey Mork Chief Executive Officer
**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        OF CUSTODIAN
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of ***Sun
        Oil & Gas Corp.*** ,
        a ***Nevada*** corporation (the "Company"), on ***10-QSB*** for the
        period ended ***April
        30, 2005*** as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Peter G. Wilson, President/
        director of the
        Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
        1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                  or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
        June 15, 2005
  /s/Peter
          G. Wilson
 Peter
          G.
          Wilson
 President/
          director
No. 00-459.

#### Gaudiano et al. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment va*1109cated, and ease remanded for further consideration in light of *Gitlitz*v. *Commissioner, ante,*p. 206.
SCPR-20-0000008

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

IN RE GARY D. PARSONS, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE (By Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition to resign and surrender his license to practice law in the State of Hawai # i, filed by Gary D. Parsons, pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai # i(RSCH), and the affidavits submitted in support thereof, we conclude that Petitioner Parsons has fully complied with the requirements of RSCH Rule 1.10. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g), that the Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the name of Petitioner Gary D. Parsons, attorney number 4467, from the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai # i, effective with the filing of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, January 28, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPR-20-0000008 28-JAN-2020 11:37 AM
#### TALCOTT v. HOLL.

No. 38910.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 224 So.2d 420.
EXHIBIT 32.1




RULE
13a - 14(b) CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF


FINANCIAL
OFFICER




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officers of Source Interlink
Companies, Inc. (the “Corporation”) hereby certify that the Corporation’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2008 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Corporation.




Date:
      April 15, 2008/s/
      MICHAEL R. DUCKWORTHName:
      Michael R. DuckworthTitle:
      Chairman of the Board of Directors/s/
      MARC FIERMANName:
      Marc FiermanTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Lieberman, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of Advanced Plant Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 15, 2004

/s/ David Lieberman
David Lieberman
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with this amended Annual Report of CRC Crystal Research Corporation  (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kiril Pandelisev, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of CRC Crystal Research Corporation .
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
   CRC CRYSTAL RESEARCH CORPORATION
  By:
/s/Kiril PandelisevKiril PandelisevChief Executive Officer
  Date: December 7, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24110]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


USIA Seeks Private Sector Partners for Hannover Expo 2000

AGENCY: United States Information Agency.

ACTION: Seeking Private Sector Partners for Hannover Expo 2000.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Information Agency announces that the United 
States intends to participate at Hannover Expo 2000, a World Fair 
officially sanctioned by the Bureau of International Expositions, to be 
held in Hannover, Germany, from June 1-October 31, 2000. Participation 
will entail the design, fabrication and operation of a 40,000 square 
foot U.S. Pavilion focusing on the expo theme, ``Mankind-Nature-
Technology.'' Financing is being sought through cash and ``in kind'' 
contributions from the private sector, as well as state and local 
governments and other organizations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Organizations wishing to contribute 
to, or participate in, this project should contact the United States 
Information Agency's Hannover Expo 2000 Coordinator, Mr. James E. Ogul, 
by mail at U.S. Information Agency, E/SP, 301 Fourth St., S.W., Rm. 
314, Washington, DC 20547; Telephone: 202-260-6511, Fax: 202-401-5618, 
or the Internet: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6822272f3d24283d3b2129462f273e46">[email protected]</a> All correspondence will be considered.

    Dated: September 5, 1997.
John G. Busch,
Senior Contracting Officer, Office of Contracts.
[FR Doc. 97-24110 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1343

GRACE J. HADEED; JOAN WINTER, Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus THOMAS ABRAHAM; GLENDA ABRAHAM, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-02-695-2) Submitted: October 31, 2005 Decided: January 12, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John B. Mann, LEVIT & MANN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellants. L. Steven Emmert, SYKES, BOURDON, AHERN & LEVY, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Grace J. Hadeed and Joan Winter appeal from the district court’s order granting Thomas and Glenda Abraham’s motion for additional fees and costs under the fee-shifting provisions of the Fair Housing Act, see 42 U.S.C. § 3613(c)(2) (2000). Hadeed and Winter assert that our denial of sanctions under Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure in their prior appeal, see Hadeed v. Abraham , 103 F. App. 706 (4th Cir. June 30, 2004) (unpublished), precluded the district court from awarding additional fees and costs associated with the Abrahams’ defense of that appeal. Because Hadeed and Winter raise that issue for the first time on appeal, we decline to address it. SeeBrickwood Contractors, Inc. v. Datanet Eng’g, Inc. , 369 F.3d 385, 390 (4th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (stating general rule that appellate court generally does not consider issues raised for first time on appeal and noting exception not applicable here). Moreover, Hadeed and Winter do not challenge the grounds on which the district court relied to impose additional attorney’s fees and costs. SeeUnited States v. Al-Hamdi , 356 F.3d 564, 571 n.8 (4th Cir. 2004) (“It is a well settled rule that contentions not raised in the argument section of the opening brief are abandoned.”). Thus, they have waived appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and deny the Abrahams’ motion to dismiss the appeal. We grant the- 3 - Abrahams’ motion for Rule 38 sanctions and order Hadeed and Winter to pay $6525 in attorney’s fees and $562.40 in costs. Finally, we grant the Abrahams’ motion to strike from the joint appendix Hadeed and Winter’s motion to dismiss the Abrahams’ motion for additional fees and costs on the ground that it was not filed in the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-40502

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CESAR MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:11-CR-92-1

Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cesar MendozaHernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mendoza-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 3, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-40502 Document: 00512196632 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/03/2013
#### PROGRESSIVE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. John C. SPEARS, Appellee.

No. K-373.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

May 8, 1969.

Howell, Kirby, Montgomery & D’Aiuto, Jacksonville, for appellant.

*234Blalock, Holbrook, Lewis, Paul & Bennett, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6100

GORDON RUSSELL SELLERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-00-1243-AM)

Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 25, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gordon Russell Sellers, Appellant Pro Se. Marla Graff Decker,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gordon Russell Sellers seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Sellers v. Angelone, No.

CA-00-1243-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### CHASEBROOK, INC., and S. J. Stone, Appellants, v. William J. RAMEL and Leah Ramel, his wife; Chasebrook Construction Company, Inc., a Florida corporation; and L. R. Garson, Appellees.

No. 918.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 3, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 26, 1969.

Philip Bloom, of Bloom & Saks, Miami, for appellants.

Ralph R. Quillian, Hollywood, for ap-pellees Ramel.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of Ramel v. Chasebrook Construction Company, Fla. App.1961, 135 So.2d 876.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
#### E & E ELECTRIC CONTRACTORS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Stanley BAUMANN and Myron Singer, Appellees.

No. 69-616.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 21, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                           THE MED-DESIGN CORPORATION

              CERTIFICATION BY THE ACTING, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
          RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         I, David R. Dowsett, Acting, Chief Executive Officer of The Med-Design
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to my
knowledge:

         (1) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      * * *




DAVID R. DOWSETT
-------------------------------
David R. Dowsett
Acting, Chief Executive Officer

Date:  March 30, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

 : 4:CR-04-0293

v. : 

:

PATRICIA DIEBLER : (Judge Muir)

:

ORDER

August 26, 2005

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

Defendant Patricia Diebler awaits sentencing after having

pled guilty to a two-count indictment charging her with

conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute in

excess of 500 grams of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 846, and obstruction of justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. §

1503. A pre-sentence conference was held on July 19, 2005. On

July 20, 2005, we issued an order in which we, inter alia,

established a briefing schedule on the sentencing factors set

forth in 28 U.S.C. § 3553(a). 

On August 2, 2005, the government timely filed its brief. 

On August 18, 2005, Diebler timely filed her responsive

sentencing brief. The government filed its reply brief on August

23, 2005, but for the reasons discussed below we are of the view

that this case may not yet proceed to sentencing.

In her brief Diebler disputes a host of material facts

concerning her involvement in the charged offenses, many of which

Case 4:04-cr-00293-YK Document 48 Filed 08/26/05 Page 1 of 3
2

were set forth in the pre-sentence report and to which Diebler

did not object. The government contends in its reply brief that

Diebler’s current position disqualifies her for the three-level

downward adjustment set forth in paragraph 28 of the pre-sentence

report, which Diebler had received for her purported acceptance

of responsibility.

We will require Diebler to respond to the government’s reply

brief by way of a sur-reply brief. Diebler’s brief shall

squarely address the issue of whether she remains entitled to the

three-level downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility

in the light of the factual disputes discussed in her initial

sentencing brief. After Diebler files her sur-reply brief, we

will allow either party to file a motion for a hearing to resolve

any disputed facts which have any bearing on Diebler’s sentence.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Diebler shall, within 15 days after this order, file a

sur-reply brief addressing the issue of whether she

remains entitled to the three-level downward adjustment

for acceptance of responsibility in light of the

factual disputes discussed in her initial sentencing

brief.

2. Either party may, within 10 days after the filing of

Diebler’s sur-reply brief, file a motion for a presentence hearing to resolve any disputed facts which

Case 4:04-cr-00293-YK Document 48 Filed 08/26/05 Page 2 of 3
3

may affect Diebler’s sentence.

s/Malcolm Muir 

MUIR, U.S. District Judge

MM:ga

Case 4:04-cr-00293-YK Document 48 Filed 08/26/05 Page 3 of 3
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION
  LODE MINING CLAIM    
  



        TO
WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: 


        The
undersigned hereby certifies that he has caused to be located the OOPA #1, Lode Mining Claim in the following quarter(s) of section(s): 


        South
1/4 of Section 21, within T24N R21E. MDB&M, Washoe County, Nevada on; 






May 31,
2001. 




The
name and mailing address of the locator is: 


LARRY
G. MARTIN

3154 CLAN ALPINE

SPARKS, NEVADA 89434 






        The
claim is approximately 1500 feet long and 600 feet wide, such that 1475 feet are located the NORTH direction and 25 feet in a South direction from the point of location (monument of
location), at which the Notice of Location was posted, together with 300 feet on each side of the monument of location and center line of the Claim. The general course of the lode or vein is from
NORTH to the SOUTH direction. 


        The
number, location and markings on each corner monument are as follows: 



	Location
	 	Description

	No 1 Southeat Corner	 	Wood post at least 11/2 inches square
	No.2 Northeast corner	 	Wood post at least 11/2 inches square
	No.3 Northwest Corner	 	Wood post at least 11/2 inches square
	No.4 Southwest Corner	 	Wood post at least 11/2 inches square






        As
erected on the ground, each corner is marked with claim name, number, and which corner it is as described above on a aluminum tag attached to the post. 


        The
location work consisted of making a map as provided in NRS 517.040. 


        Dated
this 31st day of May, 2001 


        SIGNATURE
OF LOCATOR 


        By:
/s/ Larry G. Martin 











QuickLinks


CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION LODE MINING CLAIM
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 23, 2020

No. 04-20-00559-CV

Venkateswar Rao KODATI,

Appellant

v.

Nagalatha VINNAKOTA,

Appellee

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-02059

Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On December 22, 2020, the district clerk responsible for preparation of the clerk’s record 

filed a notification of late record stating the clerk’s fee has not been paid. On December 23, 

2020, we issued a memorandum opinion and judgment in this appeal granting appellant’s motion 

to dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, we DENY AS MOOT the district clerk’s notification of late 

record.

It is so ORDERED December 23, 2020.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

 CLERK OF COURT