alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32


           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Sierra Resource
Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Sandra J. Andre, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and I, Paul W. Andre, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or
Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: June 27, 2005                      By: /s/ SANDRA J. ANDRE
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Sandra J. Andre
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: June 27, 2005                      By: /s/ PAUL W. ANDRE
                                          ______________________________________
                                          Paul W. Andre
                                          Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer



A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SIERRA RESOURCE  GROUP,  INC., AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY SIERRA RESOURCE GROUP, INC., AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2055 

To amend titles 10 and 14, United States Code, to provide for the use 

of gold in the metal content of the Medal of Honor. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2005 

Mr. KERRY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend titles 10 and 14, United States Code, to provide 

for the use of gold in the metal content of the Medal 

of Honor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GOLD CONTENT FOR MEDAL OF HONOR. 

4 (a) REQUIREMENT FOR GOLD CONTENT.—Sections 

5 3741, 6241, and 8741 of title 10, United States Code, 

6 and section 491 of title 14, United States Code, are each 

7 amended by inserting after ‘‘appropriate design,’’ the fol8 lowing: ‘‘the metal content of which is 90 percent gold and 

9 10 percent alloy and’’. 
2 

•S 2055 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any Medal of 

3 Honor awarded after the date of the enactment of this 

4 Act. 

Æ
#### Edward Charles GENTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-533.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 8, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 15, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Kurt Marmar, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Paul Mendelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *G. W. B. v. State,*340 So.2d 969 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); *cert. denied,*348 So.2d 948 (Fla.1977); *Magueira v. State,*352 So.2d 587 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(b); *Baisden v. State,*203 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); *Williams v. State,*110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959); *Spencer v. State,*133 So.2d 729 (Fla.1961).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1007

ERIC E. MILLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE OF VIRGINIA; ARLINGTON 

COUNTY’S JURISPRUDENCE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00456-HEH)

Submitted: May 23, 2019 Decided: May 28, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric E. Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Eric E. Miller seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice his civil action. The district court informed Miller that he was free to file an 

amended complaint. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 624 

(4th Cir. 2015) (holding that this court lacks jurisdiction over appeals “in cases in which 

the district court granted a motion to dismiss for failure to plead sufficient facts in the 

complaint . . . because the plaintiff could amend the complaint to cure the pleading 

deficiency”). Because the district court left open the possibility for Miller to amend his 

complaint, the court’s order is not a final order appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2012), and we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Goode, 807 F.3d at 

630. In Goode, we remanded to the district court with instructions to allow amendment 

of the complaint. Id. Here, however, the district court, after closing the action, denied

Miller’s motion to amend his complaint. Accordingly, we direct on remand that the 

district court, in its discretion, either afford Miller an opportunity to file an amended 

complaint or dismiss the complaint with prejudice, thereby rendering the dismissal order 

a final, appealable order. We grant Miller’s motion to seal and dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
Exhibit 32.1

US ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND US ONCOLOGY, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of US
Oncology Holdings, Inc. (the Company) and US Oncology, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce D. Broussard,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bruce D. Broussard                                                      
|Bruce D. Broussard,                                                         
|Chief Executive Officer of US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US. Oncology, Inc.
|                                                                            
|March 2, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          53,418
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,493
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (20,161)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,768
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               144,643
<PP&E>                                          82,065
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,881)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 581,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,084
<BONDS>                                        125,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           298
<OTHER-SE>                                     310,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   581,534
<SALES>                                        244,810
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               248,293
<CGS>                                           30,919
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  233,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,942
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,770
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,172
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,172
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28


</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1626 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate 

copolymers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2005 

Mr. LAUTENBERG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain vinyl chloridevinyl acetate copolymers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN VINYL CHLORIDE-VINYL ACETATE CO4 POLYMERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.39.02 Vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate 

copolymers (CAS No. 9003– 

22–9) (provided for in subheading 3904.30.60) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 
2 

•S 1626 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 16 (Monday, January 26, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3935-3936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00773]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2011-0033; FRL-9921-78-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of New 
Mexico; Revisions to the State Implementation Plan; General Definitions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve revisions to the New Mexico State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
related to the General Definitions section of the New Mexico SIP that 
were submitted by the State of New Mexico on June 11, 2009. EPA has 
evaluated the SIP revisions for New Mexico and determined these 
revisions are consistent with the requirements of the Clean Air Act 
(Act or CAA). EPA is proposing approval under section 110 of the Act.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before February 25, 
2015.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Ms. Tracie Donaldson, Air Permits 
Section (6PD-R), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be submitted 
electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following the 
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of

[[Page 3936]]

the direct final rule located in the rules section of this Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Tracie Donaldson, (214) 665-6633; 
email address donaldson.tracie@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal 
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct rule 
without prior proposal because the Agency views this as 
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A 
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this 
action no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives relevant 
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all 
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule 
based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment 
period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do 
so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is 
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: January 6, 2015.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2015-00773 Filed 1-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### Alfonso CALLOWAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-310.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 25, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2340]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than February 14, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. John William Lowry, Ada, Oklahoma; to acquire an additional 
19.70 percent, for a total of 39.18 percent, and Denzil Floyd Lowry, 
Jr., Ada, Oklahoma, to acquire an additional 19.70 percent, for a total 
of 35.44 percent, of the voting shares of Oklahoma State 
Bancorporation, Inc., Ada, Oklahoma, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Oklahoma State Bank, Ada, Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 27, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-2340 Filed 1-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24508]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE


Depository Library Council to the Public Printer; Meeting

    The Depository Library Council to the Public Printer (DLC) will 
hold its Fall 1997 meeting on Monday, October 20, 1997, through 
Thursday, October 23, 1997, in Clearwater Beach, Florida. The meeting 
sessions will take place from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. on Monday, Tuesday, 
Wednesday, and from 9 a.m. until 12 noon on Thursday. The sessions will 
be held at the Adam's Mark Caribbean Gulf Hotel, 430 South Gulfview 
Boulevard, Clearwater Beach, Florida. The purpose of this meeting is to 
discuss the Federal Depository Library Program. The meeting is open to 
the public.
    A limited number of hotel rooms have been reserved at the Adam's 
Mark Caribbean Gulf Hotel for anyone needing hotel accommodations. 
Telephone: 800-444-ADAM, 813-443-5714; FAX: 813-442-8389. Please 
specify the Depository Library Council when you contact the hotel. Room 
cost per night is $72.
Michael F. DiMario,
Public Printer.
[FR Doc. 97-24508 Filed 9-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1520-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002), I, the Chief Executive Officer of Silver Bow
Antique Aviation (the 'Company"), hereby certify, that to the best of
my knowledge, the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 17, 2004



/s/ Darren Holm
----------------------
Chief Executive Officer






           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002), I, the Chief Financial Officer of Silver Bow
Antique Aviation (the 'Company"), hereby certify, that to the best of
my knowledge, the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 17, 2004



/s/ Dempsey Mork
----------------------
Chief Financial Officer
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 12

- 904 V

Filed: February 20, 2014

Not for P ublication

*************************************

FAITH L. MACCHIA

, *

* Damages decision based on stipulation;

Petitioner

, * influenza vaccine; Guillain

- Barré syndrome

*

*

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVIC ES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

*************************************

Diana S. Sedar

, Sarasota, FL

, for petitioner

. Lara A. Englund , Washington, DC, for respondent.

MILLMAN, Special Master

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On F ebruary 20, 2014 , the parties filed the attached stipulation

, in which they agreed to

settle this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner allege s that she suffered

Guillain

- Barré syndrome ( “ GBS ” ) that w as caused by her September 21, 2010

, receipt of influenza

( “ flu ” ) vaccine

. Petitioner further allege s that she suffe r ed the residual effects of this injury for

more than six months. Respondent denies that the vaccine caused petitioner’s G BS

, any other

injury, or her current condition

. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter informally.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned exp lanation for the special master’ s action in this

case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal

Claims’ s website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899,

2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). V accine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made

available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is

privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose di sclosure would constitute a clearly

unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to delete such information prior to the document ’ s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,

agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall

delete such material from public access.2

The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court hereby

adopts the parties ’ said stipulation, attached hereto , and awards compensation in the amount and

o n the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards a lump sum of

$25 0 ,000.00 , representing compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa

- 15(a) (2012)

. The award shall be in the form of a check for $25 0 ,000.00 made payable to

petitioner

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the

court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 20, 2014 s/ Laura D. Millman

Laura D. Millman

Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party , either separately or

jointly, fil ing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24461]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-99-000]


Kern River Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

September 10, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 8, 1997, Kern River Gas Transmission 
(Kern River) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
October 1, 1997:

Ninth Revised Sheet No. 5
Sub. Eighth Revised Sheet No. 6
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 6

    Kern River states that the purpose of this filing is to update Kern 
River's Tariff to reflect the Commission approved Annual Charge 
Adjustment surcharge of $.0021 per Dth to be effective for the twelve-
month period beginning October 1, 1997 and to correct a clerical error 
on the Statement of Rates for interruptible transportation.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest this filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24461 Filed 9-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M