alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2157 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for the Purple Heart 

to be awarded to prisoners of war who die in captivity under circumstances not otherwise establishing eligibility for the Purple Heart. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 21, 2005 

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for the 

Purple Heart to be awarded to prisoners of war who 

die in captivity under circumstances not otherwise establishing eligibility for the Purple Heart. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honor Our Fallen 

5 Prisoners of War Act’’. 
2 

•S 2157 IS 

1 SEC. 2. AWARD OF PURPLE HEART FOR PRISONERS OF 

2 WAR WHO DIE IN CAPTIVITY. 

3 (a) PERSONS NOT OTHERWISE ELIGIBLE FOR THE

4 PURPLE HEART.—Chapter 57 of title 10, United States 

5 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

6 section: 

7 ‘‘§ 1135. Purple Heart: members who die while pris8 oners of war that are not otherwise eligi9 ble under the circumstances causing 

10 death 

11 ‘‘(a) For purposes of the award of the Purple Heart, 

12 the Secretary concerned shall treat a member of the armed 

13 forces described in subsection (b) in the same manner as 

14 a member who is killed or wounded in action as the result 

15 of an act of an enemy of the United States. 

16 ‘‘(b) A member described in this subsection is a mem17 ber who dies in captivity under circumstances establishing 

18 eligibility for the prisoner-of-war medal under section 

19 1128 of this title but not under circumstances establishing 

20 eligibility for the Purple Heart. 

21 ‘‘(c) This section applies to members of the armed 

22 forces who die on or after December 7, 1941. In the case 

23 of a member who dies as described in subsection (b) on 

24 or after December 7, 1941, and before the date of the 

25 enactment of this section, the Secretary concerned shall 

26 award the Purple Heart under subsection (a) in each case 
3 

•S 2157 IS 

1 which is known to the Secretary before the date of the 

2 enactment of this section or for which an application is 

3 made to the Secretary in such manner as the Secretary 

4 requires.’’. 

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

6 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding 

7 at the end the following new item: 

‘‘1135. Purple Heart: members who die while prisoners of war that are not otherwise eligible under the circumstances causing death.’’. 

Æ
#### Arnold A. OPER and Eileen A. Oper, his wife, Appellants, v. RUSSELL, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-637.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 21, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24597]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Notice of Public Meeting of the Delaware Advisory Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Delaware Advisory Committee to the Commission which was to have 
convened at 1:00 p.m. and adjourned at 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, 
September 17, 1997, at the Holiday Inn, Downtown, 700 King Street, 
Wilmington, Delaware 19801, has been rescheduled for Wednesday, 
September 24, 1997, at the same time and place.
    The original notice for the meeting was announced in the Federal 
Register on August 26, 1997, FR Doc. 97-22577, 62 FR 55221-45222.
    Persons desiring additional information should contact Ki-Taek 
Chun, Director of the Eastern Regional Office, 202-376-7533 (TDD 202-
376-8116).

    Dated at Washington, DC, September 11, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-24597 Filed 9-11-97; 4:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 14, 2017

No. 04-17-00321-CR, 04-17-00322-CR,

04-17-00323-CR & 04-17-00324-CR

Logan FIELD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. A16292 A16293, A16294 & A16295

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant Logan Field filed separate notices of appeal for four related trial court causes

from Kerr County in appeals numbered 04-17-00321-CR, 04-17-00322-CR, 04-17-00323-CR, 

and 04-17-00324-CR. Appellant moved this court to consolidate these appeals. Because each of 

the Kerry County appeals pertains to the same event that occurred in Kerr County on February 

12, 2016, and the same grounds for a motion to suppress, we granted Appellant’s motion in part. 

We ordered Appellant and the State to file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals 

were one and to include all four appeal numbers in the style of the case. We advised the parties 

that this court would include each appeal number in any further orders, but we would maintain a 

separate appellate record for each appeal. 

On November 1, 2017, Appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief in 

these cases, and a motion to consolidate the four Kerr County appeals with five appeals from 

Gillespie County numbered 04-17-00400-CR, 04-17-00401-CR, 04-17-00402-CR, 04-17-00403-

CR, and 04-17-0004-CR. Those appeals are all based on the same event that occurred in 

Gillespie County on July 14, 2015. 

Appellant’s motion to consolidate the Kerr County and Gillespie County appeals for 

purposes of briefing and arguments is DENIED. However, this court will treat the Kerr and 

Gillespie County appeals as companion cases. The two sets of appeals will be considered and 

decided by the same panel at the same time. 
Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s 

brief is due on November 15, 2017.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of November, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
# Uradni list C 109/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 109 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 6429. marec 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 109

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 6429. marec 2021

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacije |
| | INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Evropska komisija |
| 2021/C 109/01 | Menjalni tečaji eura — 26. marec 2021 | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

IV   Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

2021/C 109/01

Menjalni tečaji eura — 26. marec 2021

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

IV Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

| 29.3.2021 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | C 109/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2021

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

C 109/1

---

Menjalni tečaji eura (1)

26. marec 2021

(2021/C 109/01)

1 euro =

| | Valuta | Menjalni tečaj |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | ameriški dolar | 1,1782 |
| JPY | japonski jen | 129,34 |
| DKK | danska krona | 7,4361 |
| GBP | funt šterling | 0,85503 |
| SEK | švedska krona | 10,1905 |
| CHF | švicarski frank | 1,1090 |
| ISK | islandska krona | 149,80 |
| NOK | norveška krona | 10,1258 |
| BGN | lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | češka krona | 26,081 |
| HUF | madžarski forint | 363,58 |
| PLN | poljski zlot | 4,6493 |
| RON | romunski leu | 4,8878 |
| TRY | turška lira | 9,4523 |
| AUD | avstralski dolar | 1,5459 |
| CAD | kanadski dolar | 1,4814 |
| HKD | hongkonški dolar | 9,1540 |
| NZD | novozelandski dolar | 1,6863 |
| SGD | singapurski dolar | 1,5865 |
| KRW | južnokorejski won | 1 332,17 |
| ZAR | južnoafriški rand | 17,6845 |
| CNY | kitajski juan | 7,7063 |
| HRK | hrvaška kuna | 7,5740 |
| IDR | indonezijska rupija | 16 986,70 |
| MYR | malezijski ringit | 4,8854 |
| PHP | filipinski peso | 57,132 |
| RUB | ruski rubelj | 89,5075 |
| THB | tajski bat | 36,654 |
| BRL | brazilski real | 6,7110 |
| MXN | mehiški peso | 24,2575 |
| INR | indijska rupija | 85,4845 |

Valuta

Menjalni tečaj

USD

ameriški dolar

1,1782

JPY

japonski jen

129,34

DKK

danska krona

7,4361

GBP

funt šterling

0,85503

SEK

švedska krona

10,1905

CHF

švicarski frank

1,1090

ISK

islandska krona

149,80

NOK

norveška krona

10,1258

BGN

lev

1,9558

CZK

češka krona

26,081

HUF

madžarski forint

363,58

PLN

poljski zlot

4,6493

RON

romunski leu

4,8878

TRY

turška lira

9,4523

AUD

avstralski dolar

1,5459

CAD

kanadski dolar

1,4814

HKD

hongkonški dolar

9,1540

NZD

novozelandski dolar

1,6863

SGD

singapurski dolar

1,5865

KRW

južnokorejski won

1 332,17

ZAR

južnoafriški rand

17,6845

CNY

kitajski juan

7,7063

HRK

hrvaška kuna

7,5740

IDR

indonezijska rupija

16 986,70

MYR

malezijski ringit

4,8854

PHP

filipinski peso

57,132

RUB

ruski rubelj

89,5075

THB

tajski bat

36,654

BRL

brazilski real

6,7110

MXN

mehiški peso

24,2575

INR

indijska rupija

85,4845

---

(1)  Vir: referenčni menjalni tečaj, ki ga objavlja ECB.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of ROO Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robin
Smyth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to ROO Group, Inc. and will be retained by ROO Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: November 18, 2004                     /s/ Robin Smyth
                --                           -----------------------------------
                                             Name: Robin Smyth
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                      1,548,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,548,189
<CGS>                                          890,978
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  890,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               509,339
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,767
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,832
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,646
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             62,791
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    62,791
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Dell Larry COLLINS, Jr.

No. 60585.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 7, 1977.

In re: Dell Larry Collins, Jr. applying for writ of review.

*336Writ refused. Relator is not entitled to relief sought herein.

DIXON, J.,

dissents from the denial and is of the opinion the applicant should be released without bond.

DENNIS and CALOGERO, JJ., are of the opinion that the State should be ordered to show cause why the relief prayed for should not be granted.
No. 00-686.

#### Neidig, Director, Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services *v.*National Warranty Insurance Co., RRG.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of National Association of Insurance Commissioners for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae*granted. Certiorari denied.
#### Ex parte John Charles DOANE.

No. 77-43.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 10, 1977.

*656FAULKNER, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
#### Anna Lee LEWIS v. STATE.

No. 38943.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 225 So.2d 170.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2010I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended March31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Holdings, Inc.    By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Executive Officer,
and DirectorDate:May 7, 2010By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Financial OfficerDate:May 7, 2010
```

[Federal Register: April 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 76)]
[Notices]               
[Page 20852]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21ap10-72]                         

[[Page 20852]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of a Health Care 
Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.
    A Special Emphasis Panel is a group of experts in fields related to 
health care research who are invited by the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ), and agree to be available, to conduct on 
an as needed basis, scientific reviews of applications for AHRQ 
support. Individual members of the Panel do not attend regularly-
scheduled meetings and do not serve for fixed terms or a long period of 
time. Rather, they are asked to participate in particular review 
meetings which require their type of expertise.
    Substantial segments of the upcoming SEP meeting listed below will 
be closed to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(6). Grant applications for the Recovery Act 2009 Limited 
Competition: Innovative Adaptation and Dissemination of AHRQ 
Comparative Effectiveness Research Products (iADAPT) (R18) applications 
are to be reviewed and discussed at this meeting. These discussions are 
likely to reveal personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications. This information is exempt from mandatory 
disclosure under the above-cited statutes.
    SEP Meeting on: Recovery Act 2009 Limited Competition: Innovative 
Adaptation and Dissemination of AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Research 
Products (iADAPT) (R18).
    Date: April 29-30, 2010 (Open on April 29 from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. 
and closed for the remainder of the meeting).
    Place: Doubletree Bethesda Hotel & Executive Meeting Center, 8120 
Wisconsin Avenue, Conference Room TBD, Bethesda, Maryland 20852.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the nonconfidential portions of this meeting 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room 2038, Rockville, Maryland 20850, Telephone 
(301) 427-1554.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as priorities 
dictate.
    This notice is published less than 15 days in advance of the 
meeting date due to logistical difficulties.

    Dated: April 13, 2010.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-9034 Filed 4-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
```
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

In  connection with the  Report of International Commercial Television Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kelvin
Claney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Karl Redekopp,
Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that,  to  the  best  of  our  knowledge  and  belief:

1.   the Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   the information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 14, 2007
                                    Signed:  /s/  Kelvin  Claney
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                    Signed:  /s/  Karl  Redekopp
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Chief  Financial  Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of ROO Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robin
Smyth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


May 19, 2006                         /s/ Robin Smyth
                                     ----------------------------
                                     Robin Smyth
                                     Chief Financial Officer
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2676

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Nancy Richmond, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 25, 1998 Filed: December 3, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Nancy Richmond pleaded guilty to making false statements to the Social Security Administration in application for payment of Social Security benefits, in violation of 42 U.S .C. § 408(a)(2). In a written plea agreement, Richmond indicated that sh e understoodshe might be required to pay $9,879 restitution. Richmond did not object to financial data included in her presentence report (PSR) or to the PSR’s statement that “restitution shall be ordered” pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines ManualThe Honorable Michael J. Melloy, Chief Judge, United Sta tes District Court for 1 the Northern District of Iowa. -2- § 5E1 .1 (1997). The district court sentenced Richmond to two years’ probation, and 1 ordered her to pay $9,879 restitution. Richmond appeals only the order of restitution, arguing that the district court abused its discretion in ordering resti tution without making factual findings about her financial resources, financial needs, or earning ability. Having reviewed the entire record and the parties & briefs, we conclude that the distric t court did not plainly err in ordering restitution without making factual findings as to Richmond & s ability to pay, as Richmond objected to neither the PSR & s information pertaining to her ability to pay nor the restitution order at sentencing, and the partie s agreed to the potential amount of restitution in the plea agreement. See 18 U.S.C

. § 3663(a)(3); United States v. Dugan , 150 F.3d 865, 868 (8th Cir.) (stand ard of review), cert. denied , 1998 WL 747502 (U.S. Nov. 16, 1998) (No. 98-6507); United States v. Osborn , 58 F.3d 387, 388-89 (8th Cir. 1995). The judgment is affirmed. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Richard HOGELAND, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-551.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 10, 1969.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Russell H. McIntosh, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.