alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-31468 of AirNet Communications Corporation on Form S-8 of our report dated March 31, 2003(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs related to substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and the Company's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsNo. 145), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AirNet Communications Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

|                           |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP  |   |   |   |
| Orlando, FloridaMarch 31, 2003 |   |   |   |
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Atypology of arguments about drone ethics**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:D 101.146/3:D 83
Item Number:0307-A-18 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001067582
 
August 20, 2018
BENEFITS

•	 Works longer, requiring fewer applications

•	 Fast and effective, making runways available sooner

•	 Applies easily with the same equipment as other liquid deicers

•	 Complimentary customer training upon request

PERFORMANCE

•	 Industry leading anti-icing characteristics

•	 Effective to -20oF (-29oC)

•	 Less slippery than glycol-based products

ENVIRONMENT

•	 Non-persistent, low BOD

•	 Readily biodegradable

•	 Does not contain urea or glycol

•	 Recognized as “relatively harmless” by U.S. Fish and Wildlife scale

APPLICATION

•	 Prewetting - apply at spreader outlet at a rate of 1.25 gallons per 100 lbs (130g/kg) of solid deicer

such as Cryotech NAAC®

•	 Anti-icing:	 0.5 gallons/1000ft2 (25g/m2)

•	 Deicing:	 1 gallon/1000ft2 (50 g/m2) near 32oF (0oC) on thin ice

	 	 3 gallons/1000ft2 (150 g/m2) below 10oF (-12oC) on 1 inch ice

•	 Re-apply when new accumulation shows first tendency to bond

•	 Plow and broom often to reduce fluid dilution

HANDLING

•	 E36 should not be stored or plumbed through systems that use galvanized, zinc, or brass

	 components

•	 Polyethylene or stainless steel containers are preferred, otherwise use carbon or low alloy steel

•	 Best practices include storing totes and drums in areas protected from weather and exposure to

	 direct sunlight

•	 Containers must be clean and free of rust, surface deposits, and residues

See Reverse Side For Product Specifications

Test Data Available Upon Request

ISO 9001:2008 & 14001:2004 CERTIFIED COMPANY

CRYOTECH E36®

Liquid Runway Deicer

AMS 1435 Certified

CRYOTECH E36

®
COMPOSITION 50% aqueous potassium acetate solution, by weight,

plus corrosion inhibitors

APPEARANCE Clear, blue*, mobile liquid, free from matter in suspension

DENSITY At 68oF (20oC) = 10.68 lbs/gallon (1.28 g/cm3)

VISCOSITY At 68oF (20oC) = 10cp maximum

At 32oF (0oC) = 20cp maximum

FLASH POINT Nonflammable

FREEZING POINT -76oF (-60oC)

MISCIBILITY WITH WATER Complete

TYPICAL pH 10.5 to 11.5

SPECIFIC GRAVITY At 68oF (20oC) = 1.25 - 1.30

PACKAGING 55 gallon drums (208 liters) - 4 drum minimum

265 gallon tote (1003 liters) - 1 tote minimum

Bulk - 4400 gallons minimum

* MAY BE COLORLESS AT CUSTOMER REQUEST

PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS - CRYOTECH E36®

TO ORDER OR FOR PRODUCT INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ph: +1 319.372.6012 or +1 800.346.7237 Fax: +1 319.372.2662

E-mail: deicers@cryotech.com

Cryotech Deicing Technology . 6103 Orthoway . Fort Madison, IA . 52627 

WWW.CRYOTECH.COM

Form #MKT600 Rev. 11/15/2010
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 183 (Monday, September 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25036]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-523-000]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

September 16, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 11, 1997, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff 
sheets bearing a proposed effective date of November 1, 1997:

Title Page
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 019A
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 055
Second Revised Sheet No. 055A
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 063
Third Revised Sheet No. 063A
Second Revised Sheet No. 155A

    Columbia Gulf is making the instant filing to revise the Title Page 
to reflect a change in the mailing address, telephone and fax numbers 
for its tariff. Columbia Gulf is also making changes to its tariff to 
correct minor grammatical errors and remove duplicative language found 
on its tariff sheets. Finally, Columbia Gulf states that it is 
withdrawing two tariff sheets because the two sheets are reserved 
sheets that are indicated as such on the preceding tariff sheets.
    Columbia Gulf states that copies of its filing have been mailed to 
all firm customers, interruptible customers, affected state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be herd or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Regulations. All such interventions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. A copy of this filing is on file with the 
Commission and is available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-25036 Filed 9-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case No. 11-3885 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

ORDER

 

KAISER ALUMINUM FABRICATED PRODUCTS, LLC 

 Petitioner 

v. 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

 Respondent 

 

 In accordance with Rule 33(d), Rules of the Sixth Circuit, and upon consideration of the 

parties' stipulation to dismiss, 

 It is ORDERED that the case is dismissed pursuant to 42(b), Federal Rules 

of Appellate Procedure. 

 

ENTERED PURSUANT TO RULE 33(d), 

RULES OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Leonard Green, Clerk 

Issued: March 22, 2012 

___________________________________ 

Case: 11-3885 Document: 006111250488 Filed: 03/22/2012 Page: 1
LiDAR Drone Services, LLC

Equipment Checklist

A. Aircraft

a. Travel case

b. Log book

c. 2 camera mounting screws

d. 2 battery trays

B. Batteries

a. Flight batteries

b. Video transmitter batteries

c. Velcro

C. Camera Equipment

a. Travel Case

b. Batteries

c. Charger

d. Lens cap

e. Lens

f. Cleaning Cloths

g. Dust Blaster

h. Filters

i. SD cards

D. Ground stations

a. Monitors

b. Tripods

c. Antennas

d. Batteries

e. Battery adapter cables

E. Radios

a. Travel case

b. Batteries

c. Charger

F. Charger

a. Power supply

b. Power supply cable

c. Charger

d. Balance boards

e. Battery adapters

G. Laptop

a. Power supply

b. Laptop carrying case

H. Spare parts

a. Propellers

b. Zip ties

c. Super glue

d. Double­sided tape

e. Boom locks

f. Velcro

I. Tools

a. Battery voltage checkers

b. Tool kit

c. Scissors

d. Allen wrenches

e. Infrared thermometer

f. Soldering iron

g. Solder

h. Shrink tube

J. Payload

a. LiDAR sensor

b. IMU unit

c. GPS unit

d. Intel Nuc Onboard Computer

e. Camera
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24898]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[NV-030-97-1820-00-24-1A]


Bureau of Land Management, Carson City District Office--Notice of 
Change of Address and Relocation

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Change of address and relocation notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Carson City District Office of the Bureau of Land 
Management will be moving on or about September 15, 1997 from 1535 Hot 
Springs Road, Carson City, Nevada 89706 to 5665 Morgan Mill Road, 
Carson City, Nevada 89701. The telephone number, (702) 885-6000 will 
remain the same.
    Because of the relocation, records and services will be unavailable 
from September 10, 1997 until approximately September 17, 1997. The 
telephone will also be disconnected during a portion of this time.
    The Carson City District Office of the Bureau of Land Management 
will reopen at 5665 Morgan Mill Road, Carson City, Nevada 89701 on 
September 15, 1997 for some services and records will be available as 
soon as possible. Office hours will be 7:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday 
through Friday.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kelly Madigan, Carson City Assistant District Manager for Support 
Services, (702) 885-6000.

    Dated: September 5, 1997.
Karl Kipping,
Associate District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-24898 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.4

Number                                                                   Shares
------                                                                   ------

PB-1


                     APRISMA MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

             Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, $.01 Par Value

                 SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER


This certifies that CPQ Holdings, Inc. is the owner of 785,556 (Seven Hundred,
Eighty-Five Thousand, Five Hundred and Fifty-Six) shares, fully paid and
nonassessable, of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Aprisma Management
Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, transferable only on the books of
the corporation by the holder hereof in person or by attorney upon surrender of
this certificate properly endorsed.

This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of
the State of Delaware and to the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation and the By-laws of the corporation, in each case as from time to
time amended.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Aprisma Management Technologies, Inc. has caused this
certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers and its corporate seal
to be hereto affixed this 6th day of December, 2000.


------------------------------                    ------------------------------
President                                         Secretary
<PAGE>

                           Restrictions on Transfer
                           ------------------------

     The shares of stock represented by this certificate have not been
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the securities
laws of any state, and may not be sold, or otherwise transferred, unless and
until such shares are registered under such Act, or such state laws, or unless
an opinion of counsel is furnished to the Company (which opinion and counsel
rendering the same shall be reasonably satisfactory to the Company) to the
effect that such registration is not required.


                                  Assignment
                                  ----------

     For value received, ___________ hereby sell, assign and transfer to
____________ shares of the Capital Stock represented by this certificate, and do
hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint _____________ Attorney to transfer
such stock on the books of _______________ with full power of substitution in
the premises.

     Dated __________, 20__


                                                -------------------------------
                                                Signature of registered owner
                                                corresponding exactly to the
                                                name of such owner as written on
                                                the face of this certificate



--------------------------
Witness
#### DEAUVILLE HOTEL and Employers Service Corporation, Petitioners, v. Elaine LIND and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38485.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 14, 1969.

Eugene E. Williams, of Williams & Ja-bara, Miami, for petitioners.

Stephen J. Avrach, of Frankel, Avrach & Segal, Miami Beach, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 6, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

Respondent-Lind’s petition for attorney’s fee in the sum of $250.00 is granted.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### Keith WHITE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-887.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 28, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arthur Joel Berger, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and HEN-DRY and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was tried non jury and found guilty under a two-count information charging him with possession of heroin and methaqualone.

The sole point on appeal questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s finding of guilt.

We have carefully considered appellant’s contentions in the light of the record and briefs and have concluded that the evidence adduced was sufficient to support the court’s finding of guilt and that no reversible error has been made to appear. *Dawson v. State,*338 So.2d 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *Amato v. State,*296 So.2d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

Affirmed.
#### NEAL v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION.

No. 38902.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 224 So.2d 774.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: J. A. B. v. C. N. B.

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00723

- CV

Trial court case number: 19

- DCV

- 268152

Trial court: 328th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant J.A.B. has filed a motion to strike the appellee’s brief filed by appellee C.N.B.

in the above

- referenced appeal. Appellant’s motion is denied

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s Amparo Guerra

Acting individually

Date: April 13, 2021
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.30

        I, Farzad Dibachi, certify that:

        1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Niku
Corporation;

        2.      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report; and

        3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report.


Date:  September 12, 2002

                                                /s/ FARZAD DIBACHI
                                           -------------------------------
                                                   Farzad Dibachi
                                               Chief Executive Officer
#### Otis Pierce REYNOLDS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-932.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 6, 1969.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Maurice Jay Kutner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the defendant below, who was charged by information with the crime of breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny, and grand larceny. Tried without a jury he was found and adjudged guilty of the lesser included offense of breaking and entering with intent to commit petit larceny (a felony under § 810.05 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.), and petit larceny. The sentence imposed was imprisonment for a period of eighteen months, with credit for the time served in jail prior to sentencing.

 The question presented on appeal is whether error was committed in ruling that the defendant’s confession was freely and voluntarily made and by admitting the confession in evidence. The trial court’s ruling relating to the confession, on the issues as to the adequacy of the warnings given the defendant of his rights a la Miranda and of the voluntariness of his confession, which was made orally follow-lowing his arrest and later in writing, was supported by substantial competent evidence. Upon review of the testimony relating to those issues, in the light of the evidence as to the surrounding circumstances, we are impelled to conclude that the questioned ruling was in accordance with the manifest weight of the evidence. Resolution of such issues was for the trial court, whose province it was to judge the credibility of the witnesses and the weight of the evidence. Eizenman v. State, Fla.App.1961, 132 So.2d 763; Moore v. State, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 475.

No reversible error having been made to appear, the judgment is affirmed.
#### Ludy RADNEY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-142.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 12, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49248-49249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24883]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Division of Research Grants; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following

[[Page 49249]]

meetings that are being held to review grant applications:

                             Biobehavioral and Social Sciences Initial Review Group                             
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     October-November 1997                                                      
  Study section/contact  person             meetings                    Time                    Location        
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Human Development and Aging-1,      Oct. 23-24..............  9:00 a.m................  Embassy Suites Hotel,   
 Dr. Anita Miller Sostek, 301-435-                                                       Chevy Chase Pavilion,  
 1260.                                                                                   Washington, DC.        
Human Development and Aging-3,     Nov. 6-7.................  9:00 a.m................  Embassy Suites Hotel,   
 Dr. Anita Miller Sostek, 301-435-                                                       Chevy Chase Pavilion,  
 1260.                                                                                   Washington, DC.        
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 12, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-24883 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# CBRN gear checkout process improves

/ Published Nov. 28, 2018
LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz., *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Luke Air Force Base website.*