alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>


                                   Exhibit 27

     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                   jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                                         322,806
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  293,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   (25,376)
<INVENTORY>                                                    1,315,323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               2,061,996
<PP&E>                                                         3,354,652
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 (748,158)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 5,416,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          649,888
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       11,021,050
<OTHER-SE>                                                     2,072,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   5,416,648
<SALES>                                                        221,979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               221,979
<CGS>                                                          534,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  534,646
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               506,960
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             6,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (825,750)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   (15,123)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (810,627)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (0.27)



</TABLE>
Home
About Us
Meeting Information
Federal Legislation
Pressroom
Contact Us

# 	CCAC Meetings, Recommendations and Minutes

NOTE: In order to keep this section up-to-date, some of the documents below are posted while under review to ensure Section 508 compliance.  As they are completed, these documents will be replaced.  To obtain a printed copy of any non-compliant document, please call (202) 354-7502.
#### Janis Roy CAROLLO et al. v. Barbara WILSON and New Orleans Public Service, Inc.

No. 60079.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 10, 1977.

In re: Janis Roy. Carollo- et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans, 345 So.2d 601.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0896 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 - SW - 070 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-75,875

EX PARTE JOSEPH MICHAEL STERLING, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 886600-A IN THE 185 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of failure to register

as a sex offender and sentenced to twenty-seven years’ imprisonment. The Seventh Court of

Appeals affirmed his conviction. Sterling v. Texas, No. 07-02-0183-CR (Tex. App. – Amarillo,

April 3, 2003, no pet.)

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because

he failed to note that one of the prior convictions used to enhance Applicant’s punishment range to
that of a habitual felony offender was not available for such use. 

The trial court has determined that trial counsel was ineffective in that counsel allowed

Applicant to plead “true” at the punishment stage to the invalid enhancement, and that such

ineffective representation prejudiced Applicant in that the jury was instructed to sentence Applicant

under the incorrect punishment range. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to a new

punishment trial in Cause No. 886600-A from the 185th Judicial District Court of Harris County.

The sentence in that cause is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the trial court for a new

sentencing trial. 

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: March 19, 2008

Do Not Publish
**EXHIBIT32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with thisAmendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of VCampus Corporation forthe period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in thecapacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

(1)             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of VCampus Corporation as of, andfor, the periods presented in the Report.

 
|        |   |   |   |   |   | /S/ CHRISTOPHER L. NELSON |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   |   |   |   |   | Christopher L. Nelson     |
|   |   |   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

April 26, 2007

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          27,876
<SECURITIES>                                    26,808
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,077)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,653
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,712
<PP&E>                                           4,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,096
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,058
<BONDS>                                            167
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           126
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,096
<SALES>                                         48,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,833
<CGS>                                           15,955
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,716
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (93)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,964
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,770
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,194
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,194
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.76<F1>
<FN>
<F1>ADDITIONAL CURRENT ASSET - DEFERRED          2,280
ADDITIONAL CURRENT ASSET - OTHER                   843
OTHER ASSET - DEFERRED TAXES
OTHER ASSETS - NET                                 204
INTEREST INCOME                                  1,895
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24604]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Networking and Communications Research 
and Infrastructure; Notice of Meetings

    This notice is being published in accord with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended). During the period October 1 
through 22, 1997, the Special Emphasis Panel in Networking & 
Communications Research & Infrastructure (1207) will be holding panel 
meetings to review and evaluate research proposals. The dates and types 
of proposals being reviewed are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Dates of meetings                    Types of proposal       
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10/1/97...............................  K12.                            
10/6/97-..............................  College.                        
10/7/97...............................                                  
10/15/97-.............................  High Performance.               
10/16/97..............................                                  
10/21/97-.............................  High Performance.               
10/22/97..............................                                  
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Times: 8:30 to 5:00 p.m. each day.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meetings: Closed.
    Contact Person: Douglas Gatchell, Program Director, Division of 
Networking & Communications Research & Infrastructure, Room 1175, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230, 
telephone (703) 306-1949.
    Purpose of Meetings: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the 
connections to the Internet Program as part of the selection process 
for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 USC 552b(c) (4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: September 11, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-24604 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00683-CR

James Douglas Jones, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 421ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 2003-197, HONORABLE JACK ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

In April 2004, appellant James Douglas Jones was placed on deferred adjudication

community supervision after he pleaded guilty to the aggravated assault of a public servant. See Tex.

Penal Code Ann. § 22.02 (West Supp. 2009). Following a hearing on September 29, 2008, the trial

court granted the State’s motion to adjudicate, adjudged appellant guilty, and sentenced him to

twenty-five years in prison.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record

demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio,

488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State,

516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972);
2

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s

brief and has filed a pro se brief in response.

We have reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and the pro se brief. We agree with

counsel that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might

arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)

(holding that it is constitutional error for appellate court to address nonmeritorious arguments raised

in pro se response to Anders brief). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: November 20, 2009

Do Not Publish
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1578 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1578

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
 To reauthorize the Upper Colorado and San Juan River Basin endangered 
                 fish recovery implementation programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Upper Colorado and San Juan River 
Basin Endangered Fish Recovery Programs Reauthorization Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. UPPER COLORADO AND SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN ENDANGERED FISH 
              RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS.

    Section 3 of Public Law 106-392 (114 Stat. 1602; 116 Stat. 3113) is 
amended--
        (1) in subsection (a)--
            (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``$46,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$61,000,000'';
            (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``2008'' and inserting 
        ``2010''; and
            (C) in paragraph (3), by striking ``2008'' and inserting 
        ``2010'';
        (2) in subsection (b)--
            (A) by striking ``$100,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$126,000,000'';
            (B) in paragraph (1)--
                (i) by striking ``$82,000,000'' and inserting 
            ``$108,000,000''; and
                (ii) by striking ``2008'' and inserting ``2010''; and
            (C) in paragraph (2), by striking ``2008'' and inserting 
        ``2010''; and
        (3) in subsection (c)(4)--
            (A) in the first sentence, by inserting ``and the Elkhead 
        Reservoir enlargement'' after ``Wolford Mountain Reservoir''; 
        and
            (B) in the second sentence, by striking ``$20,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$31,000,000''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### ESTATE of Harry FREEDMAN, Deceased.

No. 39125.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 22, 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 226 So.2d 423.
An Idyllic Place to Work: FOB10A

Prior to moving into the headquarters building in November 1963, the FAA gave each employee a 

brochure, “Introducing the New FAA Headquarters Building.” The brochure, distributed in March, touted 

the marvels of the brand new building, designed especially for the agency.

Most employees today might not recognize the building described in the brochure. For example, the FAA 

touted the “150-foot wide area centered on each floor and extending from end to end of the building as 

the “most spacious, well lighted, pleasant places to work in the building.

One of the benefits of the new headquarters design, according to the brochure, was that it would only take 

“1 minute to walk from the front to back and only 2 1⁄2 minutes to walk the length of the building.” More 

importantly, “sixteen high-speed electronically controlled elevators” made movement between floors fast 

and easy. And, “escalators that can carry 8,000 people an hour” would operate between the first and 

second floors and the first floor and lower garage level.

The key advantage of the building was that “there will be uniform, dependable air-conditioning to evenly 

control temperature, humidity, and fresh air flow. Recessed fluorescent lighting will leave no dark corners 

day or night.” With regard to the interior décor, the FAA proudly stated that the agency worked hard “to 

assure that every detail of décor will be completely modern, harmonious, colorful, and comfortable.”

In addition, “one of the fringe benefits of the building is the view a majority of FAA people will have 

from a thousand floor-to-ceiling windows. Many of the windows on the south side of the building look 

over a broad panorama stretching from the hills across the Anacostia River westward to the Tidal Basin. 

To the north, windows look out on a scenic arc that extends from the Capitol Building westward along the 

Mall to the Lincoln memorial and beyond that to Arlington across the Potomac.”

Notice the Lincoln Memorial from the 

windows inside the lobby.
The agency also ensured that no employee would ever go hungry. “Dining room and snack bar areas on 

the second floor can be reached in very few minutes from any part of the building. Furnishing will be 

colorful and comfortable.” The brochure explained that “FAA, GSA, and Government Services, Inc. have 

been planning ways and means of providing excellent food service served in an appetizing manner and in 

very pleasant surroundings.”

The building’s access to major transportation routes was also important to commuters. “Public and private 

highway transportation is fast being improved by new bridges across the Potomac and modern 

expressways leading into the District from all areas west of the River.” Furthermore, the “building is less 

than 10 minutes from Union Station, 15 minutes from Washington National Airport, 40 minutes from 

Dulles International Airport.”

·'

The view from the north side of the building
#### CHAMPION MANUFACTURING CO. v. MILLER.

No. 39015.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 226 So.2d 365.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Sandra
J.  Andre,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: August 8, 2008



                                        By: /s/ SANDRA J. ANDRE
                                            ___________________________
                                                Sandra J. Andre
                                                President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
23




MOORE
& ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED
 ACCOUNTANTS
AND ADVISORS
 PCAOB
REGISTERED
      CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
    We
consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10KSB/A, Amendment No. 2 of CRC
Crystal Research Corporation, of our report dated October 9, 2008 on our audit
of the restated financial statements of CRC Crystal Research Corporation as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related restated statements of operations,
stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and Inception on March 22, 1993 through December 31, 2007, and the
reference to us under the caption “Experts.”
         /s/
Moore & Associates, Chartered
 Moore
& Associates Chartered
 Las
Vegas, Nevada
 October
30, 2008
          6490
West Desert Inn Rd, Las Vegas, NV 89146 (702)253-7499 Fax
(702)253-7501