alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARY BETH FRANKENFIELD, :

Plaintiff :

: No. 4:14-cv-1112

v. :

: (Judge Kane)

:

MICROBILT CORPORATION, et al., : (Magistrate Judge Carlson)

Defendants :

ORDER

Before the Court in the above-captioned action is the October 3, 2016 Report and

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson. (Doc. No. 38.) No timely objections have been

filed. ACCORDINGLY, on this 4th day of November, 2016, upon independent review of the

record and the applicable law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carlson

(Doc. No. 38);

2. Defendant MicroBilt Corporation’s First Motion to Dismiss for Lack of

Jurisdiction (Doc. No. 32) is GRANTED;

3. Plaintiff Mary Beth Frankenfield’s amended complaint (Doc. No. 19) is

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 

4. Plaintiff may amend her complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this

Order to address the pleading deficiencies identified in Magistrate Judge

Carlson’s Report and Recommendation with respect to standing; and

5. This matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Carlson for further proceedings.

 s/ Yvette Kane 

Yvette Kane, District Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania

Case 4:14-cv-01112-YK-MCC Document 39 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material                respects the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                                                               |                                     |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                          |                                |
|         |                                                                                                               | /s/ Weibing                      Lu |
|         |                                                                                                                    |
|         | Weibing                        Lu Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 14,                        2006  |

----
#### Hanzel BAKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-709.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 6, 1971.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Alan R. Dakan, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Alan M. Medof, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Brock v. State, Fla.1954, 69 So.2d 344; Child v. Wainwright, Fla.1963, 148 So.2d 526; Bretti v. State, Fla.App.1966, 192 So.2d 6. See also: State v. Lilja, 155 Minn. 251, 193 N.W. 178.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 13

- 14345

________________________ Docket No. 2:10

- cv
- 01840

- IPJ

ALABAMA GAS CORPORATION, Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

versus TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, ST. PAUL MERCURY IN SURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants

- Appellees.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

_______________________ _ ( June 11, 2014)

Before MARCUS and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and TREADWELL, * District Judge.

* Honorable Marc T. Tread well, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia, sitting by designation.

Case: 13-14345 Date Filed: 06/11/2014 Page: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:

This case is a state

- law case involving a question of coverage under a series of insurance contracts dealing with land, hazard ous substanc es and clean

- up costs.
In full opinion s , the district court ruled by summary judgment for insu r er and against coverage for indemnification and against bad faith damages for the
insurer’s refusal to defend. After hearing oral argument and afte r deliberation, we
see no reversible error and af firm the judgment. Briefly stated, w e agree that the occurrences that might trigger coverage in this case happened too early

-- before 1949

-- for the proved pertinent policy period s . About bad faith, we agree that, given the circumstances, the amount of
time that elapsed before the insurer’s express denial does not equal a n earlier constructive denial. And we agree that the question of whether a PRP letter from
the EPA triggered a defense obligation was debatable before the Supreme Court of Alabama decided the question in this case

. The record will not support bad faith.
AFFIRMED. Case: 13-14345 Date Filed: 06/11/2014 Page: 2 of 2
### Floods of May 1968 in south Arkansas

By: R.C. Gilstrap

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1970A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### George GILBERT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-314.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 11, 1970.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and J. Christian Meffert, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record on appeal having been examined and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate prejudicial error, the judgment appealed is hereby affirmed. Woods v. State, 154 Fla. 203, 17 So.2d 112 (1944).

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
#### Alfred HARTWELL v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50502.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 31, 1978.

Clyde W. Mullins, Natchez, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Calvin Coolidge Williams, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from County Court, Adams County; Robert A. Bonds, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and SUGG and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
### Surface water of Mariana, Caroline and Samoa Islands through June 1960

By: E. L. Hendricks

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1751

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# Úradný vestník C 109/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 109 |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 6429. marca 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 109

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 6429. marca 2021

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informácie |
| | INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE |
| | Európska komisia |
| 2021/C 109/01 | Výmenný kurz eura — 26. marca 2021 | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Európska komisia

2021/C 109/01

Výmenný kurz eura — 26. marca 2021

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

IV Informácie

INFORMÁCIE INŠTITÚCIÍ, ORGÁNOV, ÚRADOV A AGENTÚR EURÓPSKEJ ÚNIE

Európska komisia

| 29.3.2021 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | C 109/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2021

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

C 109/1

---

Výmenný kurz eura (1)

26. marca 2021

(2021/C 109/01)

1 euro =

| | Mena | Výmenný kurz |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | Americký dolár | 1,1782 |
| JPY | Japonský jen | 129,34 |
| DKK | Dánska koruna | 7,4361 |
| GBP | Britská libra | 0,85503 |
| SEK | Švédska koruna | 10,1905 |
| CHF | Švajčiarsky frank | 1,1090 |
| ISK | Islandská koruna | 149,80 |
| NOK | Nórska koruna | 10,1258 |
| BGN | Bulharský lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Česká koruna | 26,081 |
| HUF | Maďarský forint | 363,58 |
| PLN | Poľský zlotý | 4,6493 |
| RON | Rumunský lei | 4,8878 |
| TRY | Turecká líra | 9,4523 |
| AUD | Austrálsky dolár | 1,5459 |
| CAD | Kanadský dolár | 1,4814 |
| HKD | Hongkongský dolár | 9,1540 |
| NZD | Novozélandský dolár | 1,6863 |
| SGD | Singapurský dolár | 1,5865 |
| KRW | Juhokórejský won | 1 332,17 |
| ZAR | Juhoafrický rand | 17,6845 |
| CNY | Čínsky juan | 7,7063 |
| HRK | Chorvátska kuna | 7,5740 |
| IDR | Indonézska rupia | 16 986,70 |
| MYR | Malajzijský ringgit | 4,8854 |
| PHP | Filipínske peso | 57,132 |
| RUB | Ruský rubeľ | 89,5075 |
| THB | Thajský baht | 36,654 |
| BRL | Brazílsky real | 6,7110 |
| MXN | Mexické peso | 24,2575 |
| INR | Indická rupia | 85,4845 |

Mena

Výmenný kurz

USD

Americký dolár

1,1782

JPY

Japonský jen

129,34

DKK

Dánska koruna

7,4361

GBP

Britská libra

0,85503

SEK

Švédska koruna

10,1905

CHF

Švajčiarsky frank

1,1090

ISK

Islandská koruna

149,80

NOK

Nórska koruna

10,1258

BGN

Bulharský lev

1,9558

CZK

Česká koruna

26,081

HUF

Maďarský forint

363,58

PLN

Poľský zlotý

4,6493

RON

Rumunský lei

4,8878

TRY

Turecká líra

9,4523

AUD

Austrálsky dolár

1,5459

CAD

Kanadský dolár

1,4814

HKD

Hongkongský dolár

9,1540

NZD

Novozélandský dolár

1,6863

SGD

Singapurský dolár

1,5865

KRW

Juhokórejský won

1 332,17

ZAR

Juhoafrický rand

17,6845

CNY

Čínsky juan

7,7063

HRK

Chorvátska kuna

7,5740

IDR

Indonézska rupia

16 986,70

MYR

Malajzijský ringgit

4,8854

PHP

Filipínske peso

57,132

RUB

Ruský rubeľ

89,5075

THB

Thajský baht

36,654

BRL

Brazílsky real

6,7110

MXN

Mexické peso

24,2575

INR

Indická rupia

85,4845

---

(1)  Zdroj: referenčný výmenný kurz publikovaný ECB.

---
#### Russell Lloyd SMOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 77-1544 and 77-1957.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 14, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 11, 1978.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and Susan G. Sexton, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

The only point which merits discussion is the propriety of the appellant’s sentence to confinement “at hard labor.” To be imprisoned “at hard labor” is improper because no existing statute provides for its imposition as a sentence for any offense. *Speller v. State,*305 So.2d 231 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).

Remanded for the purpose of striking the language “at hard labor” from the sentencing order; otherwise, affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

OTT, Acting C. J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
II 

Calendar No. 528 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2146 

[Report No. 109–289] 

To extend relocation expenses test programs for Federal employees. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20, 2005 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. LIEBERMAN, and Mr. AKAKA) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

JULY 21, 2006 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To extend relocation expenses test programs for Federal 

employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RELOCATION EXPENSES TEST 

4 PROGRAMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5739 of title 5, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 2146 RS

1 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘for a pe2 riod not to exceed 24 months’’; and 

3 (2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘7 years’’ and 

4 inserting ‘‘11 years’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall take effect as though enacted as part 

7 of the Travel and Transportation Reform Act of 1998 

8 (Public Law 105–264; 112 Stat. 2350). 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS

wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
Calendar No. 528 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2146 

[Report No. 109

–289] 

A BILL 

To extend relocation expenses test programs for 

Federal employees. 

JULY 21, 2006 

Reported without amendment 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
```

[Federal Register: April 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 80)]
[Notices]               
[Page 22100-22101]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27ap10-30]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD

 
Meetings

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 22101]]

SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board) plans to hold its regular committee and Board meetings 
in Washington, DC, Tuesday and Wednesday, May 11-12, 2010, at the times 
and location noted below. A public hearing will also be held on the 
morning of May 12, 2010.

DATES: The schedule of events is as follows:

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

10-11 a.m. Briefing on Passenger Vessels Proposed Rule (closed to 
public).
11-2:30 p.m. Planning and Evaluation Committee.
2:30-3 Budget committee.
3-3:30 Ad Hoc Committee on Frontier Issues (closed to public).
3:30-5 Ad Hoc Committee on Medical Diagnostic Equipment (closed to 
public).

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

9-Noon Public Hearing on Information and Communication Technology 
Standards and Guidelines.
1:30-3 p.m. Board Meeting.

ADDRESSES: All meetings will be held at the Embassy Suites DC 
Convention Center Hotel, located at 900 10th Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information regarding the 
meetings, please contact David Capozzi, Executive Director, (202) 272-
0010 (voice) and (202) 272-0082 (TTY).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board will hold a public hearing on its 
refresh of accessibility criteria for information and communications 
technologies covered by the Rehabilitation Act (section 508) and the 
Telecommunications Act (section 255). The hearing will take place on 
Wednesday, May 12, 2010 from 9 a.m. to noon. Details of this hearing 
were published in the Federal Register on April 13, 2010 (75 FR 18781). 
At the Board meeting scheduled on the afternoon of Wednesday, May 12, 
2010, the Access Board will consider the following agenda items:
     Approval of the draft March 31, 2010 meeting minutes.
     Budget Committee Report.
     Planning and Evaluation Committee Report.
     Ad Hoc Committee Reports.
     Executive Director's Report.
     ADA and ABA Guidelines; Federal Agency Updates.
    All meetings are accessible to persons with disabilities. An 
assistive listening system, computer assisted real-time transcription 
(CART), and sign language interpreters will be available at the Board 
meetings and public hearing. Persons attending Board meetings are 
requested to refrain from using perfume, cologne, and other fragrances 
for the comfort of other participants (see http://www.access-board.gov/about/policies/fragrance.htm for more information).

David M. Capozzi,
 Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-9723 Filed 4-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the
requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of CCF Holding Company (the issuer), hereby certifies as follows:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the issuer (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.

Dated this 29th day of March, 2007.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Mary Jo Rogers                     
|Mary Jo Rogers, Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to the issuer and will be retained by the issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Alfred ALEXANDER.

No. 61257.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1978.

William J. O’Hara, III, Supervising Atty., New Orleans, David J. Mitchell, Student Practitioner, Loyola Law School Clinic, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., William L. Brockman, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.’

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32

****

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

                     The undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | the Quarterly Report onForm 10-QSB of Oconee Financial Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) |  the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.                                                                                                                         |

| Dated: November 14, 2003 |   /s/ B. Amrey Harden                                                       B. Amrey Harden Chief Executive Officer |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  

            |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| Dated: November 14, 2003 |     /s/ Jerry K. Wages                                                     Jerry K. Wages Chief Financial Officer   |