alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Nola Collins THOMPKINS, Appellant, v. Tebo THOMPKINS, Appellee.

No. DD-276.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 8, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 1, 1977.

Reginald E. Moore, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The parties, former husband and wife, had been married almost ten years prior to their dissolution. They resided in property owned by the wife in her name. The husband, now 87 years old, did extensive remodeling of the property before and after the marriage. In addition the parties had joint accounts with assets of some $18,-000.00. When the parties separated, the husband withdrew $11,949.61 from two accounts. The trial judge granted the wife’s petition for dissolution, denied the husband’s counter-petition for special equity in the wife’s home due to the improvements made and divided the remaining assets in the joint accounts, totaling $6,868.47, between the parties.

The wife appeals arguing the trial court erred in failing to award her half of the monies withdrawn by the husband and appropriated to his own use prior to his leaving the wife. In *Beaty v. Beaty,*177 So.2d 64 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1965), the court upheld the chancellor’s award of certain sums of money withdrawn by the wife from the parties’ joint accounts without the husband’s knowledge and consent. The appellate court rejected the wife’s claim that before she could be forced to return the sums to the husband there need be a showing of fraud, stating:

> “The joint checking accounts were owned by the parties as an estate by the entire-ties and if portions thereof were removed by one of the parties for a purpose not consistent with their joint interests the chancellor could properly require a return of such portion as would do equity. The adjustment of property rights upon di*934vorce is an equitable proceeding and is governed by equitable principles.” 177 So.2d at 57.

In the case below the learned trial judge declined to award such sums to the wife, although he stated that the husband had no special equity in the real property. We feel it would be appropriate for this cause to be remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of his holding in light of Beaty v. *Beaty,*supra. In so doing, however, the chancellor should review the entire circumstances of the financial positions of the parties, their respective bank accounts, as well as whether a special equity existed in favor of the husband in the home by reason of the improvements made. See *Roberts v. Roberts,*101 So.2d 884 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1958); *Long v. Long,*304 So.2d 483 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974).

Remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, J., concur.

MILLS, J., dissents.

MILLS, Judge,

dissents.

I dissent. I would affirm. In my judgment, the trial court properly applied the law to the facts of this case and entered an equitable judgment.
#### The AMERICAN ROAD INSURANCE COMPANY v. Frank MONTGOMERY et al.

No. 61831.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1978.

In re: American Road Insurance Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 354 So.2d 656.

Writ denied.

TATE, J., would grant the writ.
Case No. 11-3885

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

ORDER

KAISER ALUMINUM FABRICATED PRODUCTS, LLC

Petitioner

v.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Respondent

In accordance with Rule 33(d), Rules of the Sixth Circuit, and upon consideration of the
parties' stipulation to dismiss,

It is ORDERED that the case is dismissed pur suant to 42(b), Federal Rules
of Appellate Procedure.
ENTERED PURSUANT TO RULE 33(d), RULES OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Leonard Green, Clerk

Issued: March 22, 2012

___________________________________ Case: 11-3885 Document: 006111250488 Filed: 03/22/2012 Page: 1
# Euroopan unionin C 83I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 083I |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 64. vuosikerta12. maaliskuu 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 083I

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

64. vuosikerta12. maaliskuu 2021

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Tiedotteet |
| | JÄSENVALTIOIDEN TIEDOTTEET |
| 2021/C 83 I/01 | Tiedot, jotka jäsenvaltiot ovat toimittaneet kalastuksen lopettamisesta | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

IV   Tiedotteet

JÄSENVALTIOIDEN TIEDOTTEET

2021/C 83 I/01

Tiedot, jotka jäsenvaltiot ovat toimittaneet kalastuksen lopettamisesta

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

IV Tiedotteet

JÄSENVALTIOIDEN TIEDOTTEET

| 12.3.2021 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CI 83/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2021

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CI 83/1

---

Tiedot, jotka jäsenvaltiot ovat toimittaneet kalastuksen lopettamisesta

(2021/C 83 I/01)

Unionin valvontajärjestelmästä, jonka tarkoituksena on varmistaa yhteisen kalastuspolitiikan sääntöjen noudattaminen, 20 päivänä marraskuuta 2009 annetun neuvoston asetuksen (EY) N:o 1224/2009 (1) 35 artiklan 3 kohdan mukaisesti on tehty päätös seuraavassa taulukossa määritellyn kalastuksen lopettamisesta:

| Kalastuksen lopettamisen päivämäärä ja kellonaika | 24.12.2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Kesto | 24.12.2020–31.12.2020 |
| Jäsenvaltio | Portugali |
| Kalakanta tai kalakantaryhmä | ALB/AN05N |
| Laji | Pohjoisen kannan valkotonnikala (Thunnus alalunga) |
| Alue | Atlantin valtameri linjan 5° N pohjoispuolella |
| Kalastusalustyyppi/-tyypit | --- |
| Viitenumero | 40/TQ123 |

Kalastuksen lopettamisen päivämäärä ja kellonaika

24.12.2020

Kesto

24.12.2020–31.12.2020

Jäsenvaltio

Portugali

Kalakanta tai kalakantaryhmä

ALB/AN05N

Laji

Pohjoisen kannan valkotonnikala (Thunnus alalunga)

Alue

Atlantin valtameri linjan 5° N pohjoispuolella

Kalastusalustyyppi/-tyypit

---

Viitenumero

40/TQ123

---

(1)  EUVL L 343, 22.12.2009, s. 1.

---
Case 4:06-cv-00864-JEJ Document 4 Filed 05/22/06 Page 1 of 1
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LAWRENCE LOMBARDI, :

:

Plaintiff :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-05-300

:

MICHAEL PUGH, ET AL., :

: (Judge McClure)

Defendant :

ORDER

June 3, 2005 

Background

This pro se civil rights action was initiated by Lawrence Lombardi, an

inmate presently confined at the United States Penitentiary, Lewisburg,

Pennsylvania. Service of the complaint was previously ordered. Presently pending

is the Plaintiff’s motion (Record document no. 15) seeking appointment of

counsel.

Although prisoners have no constitutional or statutory rights to appointment

of counsel in a civil case, the court does have broad discretionary power to

Case 4:05-cv-00300-JFM-SF Document 16 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 3
2

appoint counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Tabron v. Grace, 6 F.3d 147, 153

(3d Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1196 (1994); Ray v. Robinson, 640 F.2d

474, 477 (3d Cir. 1981). The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has stated

that appointment of counsel for an indigent litigant should be made when

circumstances indicate "the likelihood of substantial prejudice to him resulting, for

example, from his probable inability without such assistance to present the facts

and legal issues to the court in a complex but arguably meritorious case." 

Smith-Bey v. Petsock, 741 F.2d 22, 26 (3d Cir. 1984). 

In a more recent decision, the Third Circuit again recognized that “[i]ndigent

civil litigants possess neither a constitutional nor a statutory right to appointed

counsel.” Montgomery v. Pinchak, 294 F.3d 492, 498 (3d Cir. 2002) (citation

omitted). It also reiterated that the criteria developed in Tabron should be

employed in addressing the appointment of counsel issue.

Lombardi’s motion fails to set forth sufficient special circumstances or

factors that would warrant appointment of counsel at this juncture. Tabron, supra,

at 155-56. In the pleadings submitted by Plaintiff to date, he has demonstrated that

he is capable of presenting comprehensible arguments. Furthermore, this Court's

liberal construction of pro se pleadings, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972),

Case 4:05-cv-00300-JFM-SF Document 16 Filed 06/03/05 Page 2 of 3
3

coupled with Plaintiff's apparent ability to litigate this action pro se, mitigate against

the appointment of counsel. Moreover, the legal issues are relatively

uncomplicated, and the court cannot say, at least at this point, that Lombardi will

suffer substantial prejudice if he is forced to prosecute this case on his own. 

Therefore, Lombardi’s motion for appointment of counsel will be denied. 

In the event, however, that future proceedings demonstrate the need for counsel,

the matter may be reconsidered either sua sponte or upon a motion properly filed

by the Plaintiff.

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

Plaintiff's motion for appointment of 

counsel (Record document no. 15) is denied.

 s/ James F. McClure, Jr. 

JAMES F. McCLURE, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 4:05-cv-00300-JFM-SF Document 16 Filed 06/03/05 Page 3 of 3
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 227 (Monday, November 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 70421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28703]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    The following notice of a scheduled meeting is published pursuant 
to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-
409, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Times and Dates: The Commission has scheduled a meeting for the 
following date: November 29, 2012 at 11:00 a.m.

Place: Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, Lobby 
Level Hearing Room (Room 1300).

Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered: The Commission has scheduled this meeting to 
consider various rulemaking matters, including the issuance of proposed 
rules and the approval of final rules. The agenda for this meeting is 
available to the public and posted on the Commission's Web site at 
http://www.cftc.gov. In the event that the time or date of the meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time and 
place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, Assistant 
Secretary of the Commission, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-28703 Filed 11-21-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robin Smyth certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ROO Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

         (a) designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that material  information  relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others,  particularly  during the period in which this  report is
being prepared;

         (b)  evaluated  the   effectiveness  of  the  small  business  issuer's
disclosure  controls  and  presented  in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent functions);

         (a) all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the small  business  issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


May 16, 2005

/s/ Robin Smyth
Robin Smyth
Chief Financial Officer
# L_2012004EN.01002401.xml

| 7.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 4/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 4/24

---

Only the original UN/ECE texts have legal effect under international public law. The status and date of entry into force of this Regulation should be checked in the latest version of the UN/ECE status document TRANS/WP.29/343, available at:

http://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29fdocstts.html

2010 amendments to Regulation No 87 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of daytime running lamps for power-driven vehicles

Amendments to Regulation 87 published in OJ L 164, 30.6.2010, p. 46.

Incorporating:

Supplement 15 to the original version of the Regulation — Date of entry into force: 9 December 2010

Amendments to the main text of the Regulation

Amendments to the main text of the Regulation

Insert a new paragraph 6.3.3, to read:

| ‘6.3.3. | A light source module shall be so designed that regardless of the use of tool(s), it shall not be mechanically interchangeable with any replaceable approved light source.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘6.3.3.

A light source module shall be so designed that regardless of the use of tool(s), it shall not be mechanically interchangeable with any replaceable approved light source.’

---
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                  ------------

                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                              A Nevada corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gordon Muir, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




         Dated: November 13, 2009                      /s/ Gordon J. Muir
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Its: Chief Executive Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
         other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
         signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
         this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
         retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are
         accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of
         the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
         1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
         filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.














                                Exhibit 32.1 - 1
#### Tommie Lee PRYOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2078.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

May 14, 1969.

Louis R. Bowen, Jr., Public Defender, and William Ford Duane, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, Orlando, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on the authority of Belton v. State, Fla.1968, 217 So.2d 97; State v. Youngblood, Fla.1968, 217 So.2d 98.

WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS and Mc-CAIN, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 26, 2010 

0222 

Order 

 

February 26, 2010 

139450 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139450 

 COA: 292249 

Wayne CC: 76-005523 

DARRYL McGORE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 14, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Company Suwannee Holcim

Location Branford, FLTrident Kiln 1 Kiln 1 Rank = 1 2 Avg (ppmvd) 5.68 5.69 Count 274 762 99th percentile (ppmvd) 10.84 15.14

No CISWI Analysis: 30-Day Rolling THC Averages (ppmv) March 1, 2011
II 

Calendar No. 450 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2127 

[Report No. 109–258] 

To redesignate the Mason Neck National Wildlife Refuge in the State of 

Virginia as the ‘‘Elizabeth Hartwell Mason Neck National Wildlife Refuge’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 16, 2005 

Mr. ALLEN (for himself and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

MAY 25, 2006 

Reported by Mr. INHOFE, without amendment 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Mason Neck National Wildlife Refuge 

in the State of Virginia as the ‘‘Elizabeth Hartwell 

Mason Neck National Wildlife Refuge’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 2127 RS 

1 SECTION 1. ELIZABETH HARTWELL MASON NECK NA2 TIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE. 

3 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The Mason Neck National 

4 Wildlife Refuge in the State of Virginia shall be known 

5 and designated as the ‘‘Elizabeth Hartwell Mason Neck 

6 National Wildlife Refuge’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the refuge referred to in subsection (a) shall be 

10 deemed to be a reference to the Elizabeth Hartwell Mason 

11 Neck National Wildlife Refuge. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Calendar No. 450 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2127 

[Report No. 109

–258] 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Mason Neck National Wildlife 

Hartwell Mason Neck National Wildlife Refuge’’. Refuge in the State of Virginia as the ‘‘Elizabeth 

MAY 25, 2006 

Reported without amendment 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
# L_2007141EN.01008202.xml

| 2.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 141/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 141/82

---

Corrigendum to Regulation No 51 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of motor vehicles having at least four wheels with regard to their noise emissions

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 137 of 30 May 2007
  )

Above the title, the following disclaimer should be inserted:

‘Only the original UN/ECE texts have legal effect under international public law. The status and date of entry into force of this Regulation should be checked in the latest version of the UN/ECE status document TRANS/WP.29/343/, available at:

http://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29fdocstts.html’

---
#### Tracy LEWIS v. Sam C. CASHIO, District Attorney, C. Paul Phelps, Acting Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Elayn Hunt, Director, Department of Corrections.

No. 60394.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 2, 1977.

In re: Tracy Lewis applying for writ of mandamus.

Not considered. The examination of 19th Judicial District records indicates that the proceedings were not received or filed by that court.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BRADLEY C. BIRKENFELD
, Appellant,

v.

KEVIN M. COSTNER
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2050

[ July 28, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Joseph George Marx , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502020CA003819MBAJ

.

Jack Scarola of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., West Palm Beach, and David J. Sales, and Daniel R. Hoffman of David J. Sales, P.A., Sarasota, for appellant.

Scott N. Wagner and Ilana Drescher of Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod, LLP, Miami, Martin D. Singer and David B. Jonelis of Lavely & Singer, P.C., Los Angeles, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY
, D AMOORGIAN and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                             581,000
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   581,000
<PP&E>                             19,512
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     611,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              181,136
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        495,800
<COMMON>                           9,585
<OTHER-SE>                         2,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       611,701
<SALES>                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   0
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   65,340
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (65,340)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (65,340)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (65,340)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.03)
        

</TABLE>