48268 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 178 / Monday, September 15, 1997 / Notices

its ROFR for nearly the maximum rate,

for the full amount of the expiring

Huntsville capacity, for the maximum

matching term, thereby discouraging

Huntsville’s pursuit of alternative

transportation service on the Southern

Natural Gas Company (Southern) North

Alabama Project that was approved in

Docket No. CP96–153.

Huntsville requests that the

Commission: (i) Void the Midcoast

auction and MMI bids; (ii) do so on an

expedited basis, or order a stay of the

September 18, 1997 date for the exercise

of the Huntsville ROFR, pending further

Commission action on the Huntsville

complaint; (iii) investigate Midcoast and

MMI’s activities with respect to the

expiring Huntsville capacity; and (iv)

grant other relief as the Commission

deems appropriate.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said complaint should file a

motion to intervene or a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Sections

385.214 and 385.211 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure. All such motions or protests

should be filed on or before September

15, 1997. Protests will be considered by

the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make Protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection. Answers

to this complaint shall be due on or

before September 15, 1997.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–24364 Filed 9–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. TM98–1–65–000]

Jupiter Energy Corporation; Notice of

Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

September 9, 1997.

Take notice that on September 4,

1997, Jupiter Energy Corporation

(Jupiter) tendered for filing the

following sheets of effective date of

October 1, 1997:

Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 4A

Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 5A

Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 6A

Jupiter states that the filed tariff

sheets reflect the implementation of

Jupiter’s Annual Charge Adjustment

(ACA) surcharge. The proposed

surcharge rate is 0.22¢ per Dth.

Jupiter states that a copy of the filing

has been served on its jurisdictional

customer.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, N.E., Washington, DC

20426, in accordance with Sections

385.211 and 385.214 of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure. All such motions or protests

must be filed in accordance with

Section 154.210 of the Commission’s

Regulations. Protests will be considered

by the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of Jupiter’s filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–24370 Filed 9–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP97–718–000]

K N Interstate Gas Transmission

Company; Notice of Request Under

Blanket Authorization

September 9, 1997.

Take notice that on August 29, 1997,

K N Interstate Gas Transmission

Company (KNI), Post Office Box 281304,

Lakewood, Colorado 80228, filed in

docket No. CP97–718–000 a request

pursuant to Sections 157.205 and

157.212 of the Commission’s

Regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.205 and 157.212) for

authorization to install and operate

eighteen new delivery taps, under an

existing transportation agreement with

K N Energy, Inc. (KNE), a local

distribution customer. KNI also request

authorization to install and operate one

new tap for Mid-America Pipeline

Company (MAPC), an industrial

transportation service customer, under

an existing transportation agreement.

KNI is requesting authorization to

install the taps in various counties in

Nebraska and in two counties in Kansas,

to facilitate the delivery of natural gas

for agricultural, commercial, domestic

and industrial uses. KNI makes such

request under its blanket certificate

issued in Docket No. CP83–140–000 and

CP83–140–001 pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set

forth in the request on file with the

Commission and open to public

inspection.

Specifically, KNI proposed to install

the following eighteen delivery points to

KNE:

1. Two delivery points in Thayer

County, Nebraska each to deliver

approximately 29 Mcf of natural gas on

a peak day and 950 Mcf annually to

serve separate irrigation customers, at

an estimated facility cost of $1,810 each.

2. A delivery point in Gosper County,

Nebraska to deliver approximately 24

Mcf on a peak day and 792 Mcf

annually to serve an irrigation customer,

at an estimated facility cost of $1,550.

3. A delivery point in Clay County,

Nebraska to deliver approximately 19

Mcf on a peak day and 634 Mcf

annually to serve an irrigation customer,

at an estimated facility cost of $1,550.

4. Two delivery points in Boone

County, Nebraska to deliver gas to serve

two separate irrigation customers, at an

estimated facility cost of $1,810 each.

Approximately 36 Mcf is proposed to be

delivered through one of the points on

a peak day and 1,188 Mcf annually,

while approximately 26 Mcf is proposed

to be delivered on a peak day and 871

Mcf annually at the other point.

5. Two delivery points in Buffalo

County, Nebraska. One point to deliver

approximately 6 Mcf on a peak day and

198 Mcf annually to serve an irrigation

customer, at an estimate facility cost of

$1,500. The other point would be to

deliver approximately 53 Mcf on a peak

day and 43,423 Mcf annually to serve a

commercial customer, at an estimated

facility cost of $2,000.

6. Two delivery points in Fillmore

County, Nebraska to deliver gas to serve

two separate irrigation customers, at an

estimated facility cost of $1,810 each.

Approximately 29 Mcf is proposed to be

delivered through one of the points on

a peak day and 950 Mcf annually, while

approximately 26 Mcf is proposed to be

delivered on a peak day and 871 Mcf

annually at the other point.

7. A delivery point in Madison

County, Nebraska to deliver

approximately 24 Mcf on a peak day

and 792 Mcf annually to serve an

irrigation customer, at an estimated

facility cost of $1,550.

8. A delivery point in Norton County,

Kansas to deliver approximately 6 Mcf

on a peak day and 360 Mcf annually, to

serve a domestic customer, at an

estimated facility cost of $1,500.

9. Two delivery points in Pierce

County, Nebraska to deliver gas to serve

two separate irrigation customers, at an
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 178 / Monday, September 15, 1997 / Notices 48269

estimated facility cost of $1550 each.

Approximately 18 Mcf is proposed to be

delivered through one of the points on

a peak day and 594 Mcf annually, while

approximately 24 Mcf is proposed to be

delivered on a peak day and 792 Mcf

annually at the other point.

10. A delivery point in Webster

County, Nebraska to deliver

approximately 480 Mcf on a peak day

and 2,600 Mcf annually to serve a

commercial customer, at an estimated

facility cost of $3,250. KNI indicates

that this tap is slated to serve ADM/

Growmark (ADM), who requires the gas

to operate a commercial grain dryer. It

is stated that ADM required service by

September 1, 1997 to engage in its

seasonal crop drying operation, avoid

damage to newly harvested crops and

prevent economic loss to ADM.

Accordingly, KNI has expressed its

intent to provide ADM with the

required gas service on an emergency

basis.

11. A delivery point in Knox County,

Nebraska to deliver approximately 1

Mcf on a peak day and 1,440 Mcf

annually to serve a commercial

customer, at an estimated facility cost of

$1,550.

12. Two delivery points in Holt

County, Nebraska to deliver gas to serve

two separate commercial customers, at

an estimated facility cost of $2,000 and

$2,150, respectively. Approximately 67

Mcf is proposed to be delivered through

one of the points on a peak day and

24,530 Mcf annually, while

approximately 120 Mcf is proposed to

be delivered on a peak day and 650 Mcf

annually at the other point.

In addition, KNI also proposed to

install a delivery point to MAPC. KNI

states that such gas will be used to

provide compressor fuel.

A delivery point in Ottawa County,

Kansas to deliver approximately 636

Mcf of natural gas on a peak day and

115,000 Mcf annually to serve an

industrial customer, at an estimated

facility cost of $30,000.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–24356 Filed 9–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. OA96–38–000]

Long Island Lighting Company; Notice

of Filing

September 9, 1997.

Take notice that on June 25, 1997,

Long Island Lighting Company tendered

for filing its refund report in the abovereferenced docket.

Any person desiring to be heard or

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

or protests must be filed on or before

September 19, 1997. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–24360 Filed 9–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. TM98–1–15–000]

Mid Louisiana Gas Company; Notice of

Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

September 9, 1997.

Take notice that on September 4,

1997, Mid Louisiana Gas Company (Mid

Louisiana) tendered for filing to become

part of in its FERC Gas Tariff, Third

Revised Volume No. 1, the following

tariff sheets, with an effective date of

October 1, 1997:

Eighth Revised Sheet No. 4

Eighth Revised Sheet No. 4A

Mid Louisiana states that the purpose

of the filing of the Revised Tariff Sheets

is to reflect a revision to the unit rates

for the collection of the Annual Charges

imposed by Section 382 of the

Commission’s Regulations.

Mid Louisiana states that this filing is

being made in accordance with Section

22 of the General Terms and Conditions

of Mid Louisiana’s FERC Gas Tariff,

Third Revised Volume No. 1.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Sections

385.214 and 385.211 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations.

All such motions or protests must be

filed in accordance with Section

154.210 of the Commission’s

Regulations. Protests will be considered

by the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of this filing are on

file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–24367 Filed 9–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket Nos. OA97–237–000, ER97–1079–

000 and EC97–35–000]

New England Power Pool; Notice of

Filing

September 9, 1997.

Take notice that on July 31, 1997,

New England Power Pool tendered for

filing an amendment in the abovereferenced dockets.Any person desiring

to be heard or to protest said filing

should file a motion to intervene or

protest with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, 888 First

Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in

accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR

385.214). All such motions or protests

must be filed on or before September 19,

1997. Protests will be considered by the

Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to