alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of


Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that:




The
Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the "Form 10-Q")
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc.





Date:
      August 19, 2009
                  
                  
                  /s/
      William Yan Sui HuiWilliam
      Yan Sui Hui, Chief Executive
Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50135

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR SICAIROS-BELTRAN, also known as Oscar

Manuel Sicairos-Beltran, also known as Oscar Sicairos,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-1753-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Oscar SicairosBeltran raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8

U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate

criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2028 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2028

  To provide for the reinstatement of a license for a certain Federal 
                 Energy Regulatory Commission project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2005

  Mr. Byrd (for himself and Mr. Rockefeller) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the reinstatement of a license for a certain Federal 
                 Energy Regulatory Commission project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REINSTATEMENT OF LICENSE FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY 
              COMMISSION PROJECT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to project numbered 7307 of the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, the Commission shall, on the request of the 
licensee for the project, in accordance with that section (including 
the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that 
section and procedures established under that section), extend the time 
required for commencement of construction of the project until December 
31, 2007.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall apply to the project on 
the expiration of any extension, issued by the Commission under section 
13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the time required for 
commencement of construction of the project.
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If a license of the 
Commission for the project expires before the date of enactment of this 
Act, the Commission shall--
            (1) reinstate the license effective as of the date of the 
        expiration of the license; and
            (2) extend the time required for commencement of 
        construction of the project until December 31, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 3, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00534

- CV

Patricia Jo KARDELL , Martin Murphy Snowden, Mickey Darrell Snowden,

and Mary Delilla Snowden

, Appellants

v.

Edwin V. ACKER , Jr., Stephen Adolph Acker, Elaine Acker George, Shella Acker (Reinke)

Bonner, an d Edwin Scott Acker,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 06

- 001222

- CVL

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The panel has considered Appellant s ’ motion for rehearing; the motion is DENIED. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.3.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of June, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, W. Michael Smith, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of RemoteDynamics, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: December 22, 2004      /s/ W. Michael Smith  W. Michael Smith, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
   
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (i) Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-95536) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan, 1995
Stock Plan, 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and 1995 Director Option Plan of
Netscape Communications Corporation, (ii) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-99198) pertaining to the 1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Collabra
Software, Inc., (iii) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-4222) pertaining
to the 1993 Stock Option Plan of InSoft, Inc., (iv) Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-4478) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Plan of Netcode Corporation, (v)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-29931) pertaining to the 1995 Stock
Option/Issuance Plan of DigitalStyle Corporation and the 1996 Stock Option Plan
of Portola Communications, Inc., (vi) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-38469) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Plan of Netscape Communications
Corporation, (vii) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-44135) pertaining to
the 1995 Stock Option Plan of KIVA Software Corporation and the 1995 Stock Plan
of Netscape Communications Corporation, (viii) Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-55987) pertaining to the 1995 Director Option Plan, 1995 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, and 1998 Stock Option Plan of Netscape Communications
Corporation, (ix) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-57419) pertaining to
the 1998 Stock Option Plan of Netscape Communications Corporation, (x)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-68713) pertaining to the 1995 Stock
Plan of Netscape Communications Corporation, and (xi) Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-71079) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Plan of AtWeb, Inc., of
our report dated November 19, 1998 (except for Note 1 "Restatement of Financial
Statements," as to which the date is February 3, 1999) with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Netscape Communications
Corporation, as amended, included in the Transition Report (Form 10-K/A) of
Netscape Communications Corporation for the ten months ended October 31, 1998.
    
 
                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
   
Palo Alto, California
February 17, 1999
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JACQUELINE YOUNG, :

Plaintiff : Civ. No. 4: 04-CV-1887

:

vs. :

: (Judge McClure)

OLLIE’S BARGAIN OUTLET, :

INC., :

Defendant :

O R D E R

May 18, 2005

BACKGROUND:

On August 24, 2004, plaintiff Jacqueline Young filed a two count complaint

against defendant Ollie’s Bargain Outlet, Inc. The complaint made claims of sexual

harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) and the

Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”). On October 25, 2004, defendant

filed an answer and affirmative defenses to the complaint.

On March 11, 2005, defendant filed a motion to compel discovery which

was due on or before January 17, 2005. The motion and proposed order included

a request by defendant for an award of reasonable expenses, including attorneys’

fees, incurred in making the motion to compel. The motion also indicated

defendant’s numerous attempts to resolve the discovery issue before resorting to

Case 4:04-cv-01887-JFM Document 18 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 3
2

filing a motion to compel. On April 11, 2005, plaintiff’s counsel filed an opposing

brief which indicated that all necessary discovery had been provided by plaintiff on

April 1, 2005, and argued that therefore the motion was moot. 

On April 25, 2005, we ordered that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 37(a)(4)(a) defendant was entitled to sanctions for plaintiff’s failure to

make timely disclosures. Our April 25, 2005 order provided defendant with seven

(7) days to submit evidence of reasonable expenses incurred in the preparation of

the motion to compel, and the method for calculating those expenses. The order

also stated that plaintiff would then have ten (10) days from receipt of the

defendant’s statement to file a response. Upon receipt of both parties statements

the court would then determine the necessity of having a hearing.

On May 2, 2005, defendant filed its statement of reasonable expenses and

affidavit. (Rec. Doc. No. 17.) That statement indicated that defendant incurred

$1631.50 in reasonable expenses in filing the motion to compel. Plaintiff did not

file a response.

Case 4:04-cv-01887-JFM Document 18 Filed 05/18/05 Page 2 of 3
3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendant’s motion to compel is granted to the extent it seeks the

recovery of reasonable expenses in the filing of the motion. (Rec. Doc. No. 12.)

2. Defendant is entitled to $1631.50 for plaintiff’s failure to make timely

disclosures as is evidenced by defendant’s statement (Rec. Doc. No. 17), which

was not disputed by the plaintiff.

 s/ James F. McClure, Jr. 

James F. McClure, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-01887-JFM Document 18 Filed 05/18/05 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (subsection (a) and
(b)  of  Section  1350,  Chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned officer of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. (the "Company")  certifies
to his knowledge that:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
          September  4,  2004  (the  "Form  10-Q")  fully   complies   with  the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (the "Act"); and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial conditions and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods  referred to in the
          Form 10-Q.



                                                      /s/ John T. Cahill
                                                      ------------------
                                                      John T. Cahill
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      October 13, 2004

The foregoing  certification  (the  "Certification")  is being furnished  solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).

A signed original of the Certification has been provided to the Company and will
be retained  by the Company in  accordance  with Rule  12b-11(d)  of the Act and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<Page 1>

							     EXHIBIT 23.1

		      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-3144) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1993 Stock
Incentive Plan, the 1995 Non Employee Director Stock Option Plan and the 1995
Employee Stock Purchase Plan of LeCroy Corporation of our report dated August
5, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
LeCroy Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended June 30, 1997.



							  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Hackensack, New Jersey
September 10, 1997
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MICHEL CHALHOUB, 

Plaintiff 

V. 

COMMONWEAL TH OF 

PENNSYLVANIA; COLONEL 

ROBERT EVANCHICK, 

Commissioner of the Pennsylvania 

State Police; PENNSYLVANIA STATE: 

POLICE TROOPER LUKASZ OLSZAR;: 

COUNTY OF PIKE; and CRAIG A. 

LOWE, Warden Pike County 

Correctional Facility, 

Defendants 

No. 3:23cv592 

(Judge Munley) 

............................................................................................................ ................... ................................................................ ........................ . 

RDER 

in an accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

1) Defendants Pike County and Warden Craig Lowe's motion to dismiss (Doc. 

41) is GRANTED; 

2) Defendants Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Colonel Robert 

Evanchick's motion to dismiss (Doc. 42) is GRANTED; 

3) Plaintiff's amended complaints (Docs. 39-40) are DISMISSED with 

prejudice without further leave to amend; and 

Case 3:23-cv-00592-JKM Document 51 Filed 12/20/24 Page 1 of 2
4) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 

BY THE COURT: 

2 

Case 3:23-cv-00592-JKM Document 51 Filed 12/20/24 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 181 (Thursday, September 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24787]



[[Page 49000]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-88-001]


Black Marlin Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

September 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 9, 1997, Black Marlin Pipeline 
Company (Black Marlin) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to 
be effective October 1, 1997:

Substitute Eighth Revised Sheet No. 4

    Black Marlin states that the above-referenced tariff sheet is being 
filed pursuant to Section 18 of the General Terms and Conditions of 
Black Marlin's tariff to reflect an increase of the ACA charge to 
0.22 cents per MMBtu based on the Commission's Annual Charge Billing 
for Fiscal Year 1997. On August 22, 1997 Black Marlin filed a tariff 
sheet reflecting an ACA charge of 0.21 cents per MMBtu for Fiscal Year 
1997. Subsequently, Black Marlin received notice that the FERC's 
original ACA billing was in error and that the correct ACA charge is 
0.22 cents per MMBtu for Fiscal Year 1997. In the instant filing, Black 
Marlin is revising its ACA charge to 0.22 cents in compliance with the 
corrected annual charge.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, 
Washington, DC, 20426, in accordance with Sec. 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24787 Filed 9-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2189 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain fungicides containing zinc 

dimethyldithiocarbamate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 25, 2006 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain fungicides 

containing zinc dimethyldithiocarbamate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FUNGICIDE CONTAINING ZINC 

4 DIMETHYLDITHIOCARBAMATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.38.08 Fungicides containing zinc 

dimethyldithiocarbamate 

(CAS No. 137–30–4) (provided for in subheading 

3808.20.28) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•S 2189 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and 

Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors 

so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 16-BG-513

IN RE: ROBERT E. COUGHLIN, II,

Petitioner.

Bar Registration No. 480261 BDN: 61-16

BEFORE: Fisher and Thompson, Associate Judges, and Farrell, Senior Judge. 

ORDER

(FILED – July 7, 2016)

On consideration of Disciplinary Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s 

petition for reinstatement wherein Disciplinary Counsel informs the court that Mr. 

Coughlin has demonstrated that he is fit to resume the practice of law, and it 

appearing that petitioner is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, see In re

Coughlin, 23 A.3d 184 (D.C. 2011), it is 

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted. It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that Robert E. Coughlin, II, is hereby reinstated to 

the Bar of the District of Columbia. 

PER CURIAM
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2033 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate segments of the 

Taunton River in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts as a component 

of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2005 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself and Mr. KERRY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

segments of the Taunton River in the Commonwealth 

of Massachusetts as a component of the National Wild 

and Scenic Rivers System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TAUNTON RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS. 

4 Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

5 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended— 

6 (1) by designating the undesignated paragraph 

7 relating to the White Salmon River as paragraph 

8 (167); and 
2 

•S 2033 IS

1 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘(168) TAUNTON RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS.— 

3 The segment downstream from the headwaters of 

4 the Taunton River, from the confluence of the Town 

5 River and the Matfield River in Bridgewater to the 

6 Mount Hope Bay in the city of Fall River, Massa7 chusetts.’’. 

Æ
#### Harry M. BITNER, Jr., and Jessie N. Bitner, his wife, Appellants, v. Edward J. BRADY and Mary S. Brady, his wife, Appellees.

No. 2471.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 13, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### SOUTHERN INDUSTRIAL SAVINGS BANK v. GREENE.

No. 38903.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 224 So.2d 416.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated November 12,
2002, appearing in the Transition Report on this Form 10-K of Minorplanet
Systems USA, Inc, (the "Company") for the eight month period ended August 31,
2002 in previously filed Registration Statements of the Company on Form S-8 File
No. 333-2914, Form S-3 File No. 333-71340, Form S-3 File No. 333-57281 and on
Form S-8 File No. 333-71342.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
November 12, 2002