alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47830-47831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24154]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey

Request for Public Comments on Information Collection To Be 
Submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for Review Under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act

    A request for the collection of information listed below will be 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for approval under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). 
Copies of the proposed collection of information and related forms may 
be obtained by contacting the Bureau's Clearance Officer at the phone 
number listed below. Comments and suggestions on the requirement should 
be made within 60 days directly to the Bureau Clearance Officer, U.S. 
Geological Survey, 807 National Center, Reston Va 20192.
    As required by OMB regulations at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), the U.S. 
Geological Survey solicits specific public comments regarding the 
proposed information collection as to:
    1. Whether the collection of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions of the bureau, including whether 
the information will have practical utility;
    2. The accuracy of the bureau's estimate of the burden of the 
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology 
and assumptions used;
    3. The utility, quality, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and,
    4. How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated 
electronic, mechanical, or other forms of information technology.
    Title: Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.
    OMB approval number: 1028-New.
    Abstract: The information, required by the Comprehensive Test Ban 
Treaty (CTBT), will provide the CTBT Technical Secretariat with 
geographic locations of sites where chemical explosions greater than 
300 tons TNT-equivalent have occurred. Respondents to the information 
collection request are U.S. nonfuel minerals producers. Bureau form 
number: Pending OMB information collection approval.

[[Page 47831]]

    Frequency: Annual.
    Description of respondents: Companies that have conducted in the 
last calendar year, or that will conduct in the next calendar year, 
explosions with a total charge size of 300 tons of TNT-equivalent, or 
greater.
    Annual Responses: 12,370.
    Annual burden hours: 3,092.5.
    Bureau clearance officer: John E. Cordyack, Jr., 703-648-7313.
John H. DeYoung, Jr.,
Chief Scientist, Minerals Information Team.
[FR Doc. 97-24154 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-31-M
```
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 24.2



POWER OF ATTORNEY





KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned R. SCOTT MACTARNAHAN 
hereby constitutes and appoints CHARLES A. ADAMS AND GLENMORE JAMES, or 
either of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each with 
full power of substitution and resubstitution for him and in his name, place 
and stead in any and all capacities, to sign the Form 10-KSB, Annual Report, 
of Portland Brewing Co., an Oregon corporation, for fiscal year ended 
December 31, 1996, and any amendments thereto, and to file this Power of 
Attorney and the Form 10-KSB, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents 
in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting 
unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do 
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done 
in and about the premises, as fully to all interests and purposes as he might 
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said 
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or 
cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Dated this 25th day of February, 1997.



Signature




/S/ R. SCOTT MACTARNAHAN, Director
------------------------
R. Scott MacTarnahan
#### BUTERA v. J. C. VALENTI CO.

No. 39111.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
#### PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, INC., and the Travelers Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Anthony W. MAGGIO and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38529.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 4, 1970.

Leo M. Alpert, Miami, for petitioners.

Leonard L. Levenstein, Miami, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission, now Industrial Relations Commission.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose, and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10(e), 33 F.S.A.

We conclude from our consideration of the petition, record and briefs, that the order of the Commission must be quashed on authority of the decision of this Court in Brown v. Griffin, 229 So.2d 225 (Fla. 1969), and the cause remanded with directions that the matter be returned to the Judge of Industrial Claims for further findings of fact on the evidence already taken, in compliance with our opinions in Brown v. Griffin, *supra,*and Hardy v. City of Tarpon Springs, 81 So.2d 503 (Fla. 1955).

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ„ concur.
# Graybeards briefed by DLA Aviation leadership 

/ Published June 12, 2017
Richmond, Va., 
Graybeards is a term of endearment towards retired U.S. Navy officers who have essential experience from their time in service. Retired Vice Adm. Michael Malone and retired Rear Adm. Michael Finley, graybeards, toured Defense Logistics Agency Aviation at Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, and learned about the DLA Aviation perspective.     

“It was welcoming to have the graybeards here [to show them our role] in DLA,” said Navy Capt. Mark Harris, Chief, Navy Customer Facing Division, Customer Operations Directorate, DLA Aviation. “Because the graybeards took the time to come and see DLA, it’s a justification of what role we play in naval aviation.” 

 DLA Aviation Deputy Commander Charlie Lilli and DLA Aviation Chief of Staff  Steve Kinskie, along with Harris and Navy Cmdr. Eric Lockett, Operations Officer Navy Customer Facing Division, Customer Operations Directorate, DLA Aviation briefed the graybeards about DLA Aviation’s logistical support of the Boeing F/A-18E and F/A-18F Super Hornet, twin-engine, carrier-capable, multirole, fighter aircraft variants based on the McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet. 

“Both of those gentleman have specific insights and wisdom in how they used to run the [Naval Aviation Enterprise] and they can look and see how we are running the NAE and offer their perspectives and judgments,” said Harris.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ten Stix Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), we, Thomas E.
Sawyer, as President/Treasurer and Chief Executive Officer and Tony A. Cranford,
as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Dated: August 19, 2003                    /s/ Thomas E. Sawyer
                                          ---------------------
                                          Thomas E. Sawyer, President/Treasurer
                                          and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 19, 2003                    /s/ Tony A. Cranford
                                          --------------------
                                          Tony A. Cranford, Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24475]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Notice of Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, September 17, 1997.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Request from Credit Union to Convert to a Federally Chartered 
Community Credit Union.
    2. Request from a Proposed Federal Credit Union for a Low-Income 
Community Charter.
    3. Requests from Federal Credit Unions to Convert to a Community 
charter.
    4. Request from a Savings and Loan Association Converting to a 
Proposed Credit Union for Federal Share Insurance.
    5. Proposed Amendments to Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement 
(IRPS) 94-1, Chartering Manual.
    6. Proposed Rule: Amendments to Section 725.19, NCUA's Rules and 
Regulations, Central Liquidity Facility Collateral Requirements.
    7. Proposed Notice to Withdraw Certain Outdated Interpretive 
Rulings and Policy Statements (IRPS).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Becky Baker, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone 703-518-6304.
Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-24475 Filed 9-11-97; 9:35 am]
BILIING CODE 7535-01-M
Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,that the undersigned Director of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc., a Delaware corporation which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 its Annual Report on Form
10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, hereby constitutes and appoints Robert M. Pickus and John P. Burke as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent to sign such Annual Report and to file such Annual Report and the exhibits
thereto and any and all documents and amendments in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any national exchange or self regulatory agency and to do and perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be
done in connection with the foregoing as fully as they might or could do in person hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Dated: March 1, 2010



/s/ Edward H. DAlelioEdward H. DAlelio, Director/s/ James FlorioJames Florio, Director/s/ Harry C. HagertyHarry C. Hagerty, Director/s/ Mark JulianoMark Juliano, Director/s/ Michael A. KramerMichael A. Kramer, Director/s/ Don ThomasDon Thomas, Director
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________
No. 23-20401 Summary Calendar

____________ John J. Dierlam,
Plaintiff—Appellant ,

versus
Joseph R. Biden, in his official capacity as President of the United States ; United States Department of Health and Human Services; Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ; United States Department of Treasury; Janet Yellen, Secretary, U.S. Department of Treasury ; United States Department of Labor; Julie A. Su, Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor , Defendants—Appellees

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16-CV-307

______________________________
Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: *

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 29, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-20401 Document: 34-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/29/2024No. 23-20401

2 Pro se Plaintiff John Dierlam brought claims challenging the Affordable Care Act (ACA) alleging a myriad of violations of the United States Constitution and The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). Dierlam sought both retrospective and prospective relief. This pro se case was previous ly before this court in 2020. See Dierlam v. Trump , 977 F.3d 471 (5th Cir. 2020). Th ere, we remanded the case so the district court could conduct a full moot ness analysis and so Plaintiff could seek a refund of the shared-responsib ility payments he made under the ACA from 2014-2017 (a fee imposed on indi viduals who failed to purchase health insurance) (retrospective relief). Id. at 475, 478. As to pr ospective relief, this court concluded that changes in the la w raised questions of standing and mootness which the district cour t was to address on remand. Id. at 473-74. On remand, the district court gran ted Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss finding that Plaintiff’s claims were moot and/or lacked standing because the Tax Cut and Jobs Act reduced the shared-responsibility payments to $0; the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) created exemptions to the contrace ptive-coverage requirement, which included an individual exemption for indi viduals like Plaintiff; and Plaintiff could not state an injury under § 15 02(c) of the ACA. After permitting Plaintiff to file a Third Amended Compla int, Defendants filed another Partial Motion to Dismiss which the district court granted. Plaintiff appealed. This court has considered this appe al on the basis of the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, the judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court’s detailed clarifying memorandum on the dismissal of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. Those reasons also apply to Plaintiff’s Third Amende d Complaint. The district court did not err in granting Defendants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss. We AFFIRM

. Case: 23-20401 Document: 34-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/29/2024
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00360- CV

Texas Edu cation Agency and Michael L. Williams, Com m ission er of Edu cation,

in h is Of fi cial Capacity, Appellants
v. Am eric an Youthw orks, Inc. d/b /a Am eric an Youthw orks Charter School an d Honors Academ y, Inc. d/b /a Honors Academ y Charte r School, Appellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 419 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 4-0 0067 2, H ONO RAB LE O RLINDA NARANJO , JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R
P ER CURIAM

A p p e ll e e s ’ e me r g e n c y mo ti o n f o r t e m p o r a r y o r d e r s is d e n ie d
. S

e e T e x. R. A

p p . P. 2 9
. 3
. I t is ordere d J une 17, 2014.

Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Rose
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LeCroy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Sean B. OConnor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 9, 2008



/S/    SEAN B.
OCONNORSean B. OConnorChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.
OCTAVIANO TORRES

- NEVAREZ , Petitioner

.

No. 1 CA

- CR 17

- 0422 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2010

- 156887

- 001 The Honorable Dawn M. Bergin , Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

APPEARANCES
Octaviano Torres

- Nevarez , Florence Petitioner Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Diane Meloche Counsel for Respondent FILED 1-16-2018STATE v. TORRES

- NEVAREZ Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge James P. Beene, Judge Randall M. Howe and Judge Kent E. Cattani delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM:
¶1 Petitioner Octaviano Torres

- Nevarez seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- convi ction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Proce dure 32.1. This i s Petitioner’s third petition for post

- conviction relief. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petit ion for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
#### Theresa Marie ROBINSON, Appellant, v. Duane Hugh ROBINSON, Appellee.

No. 68-996.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 8, 1969.

Von Zamft & Smith, Miami, for appellant.

James Nelson of Highsmith & Nelson, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Friedman v. Friedman, Fla. 1958, 100 So.2d 167; Koones v. Koones, Fla.App.1963, 149 So.2d 88; Bennett v. Bennett, Fla.App.1962, 146 So.2d 588.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7102

KEVIN HERRIOTT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BRIAN P. STIRLING, Director, in individual and official capacity; CHARLES 

WILLIAMS, Warden, in individual and official capacity; JOEL ANDERSON, 

Warden, in individual and official capacity; AARON JOYNER, Warden, in 

individual and official capacity; MICHAEL STEPHEN, Warden, in individual and 

official capacity; SCOTT LEWIS, Warden, in individual and official capacity; 

WILLIE DAVIS, Warden, in individual and official capacity; RICHARD 

COTHRAN, Warden, in individual and official capacity; LEVERN COHEN, 

Warden, in individual and official capacity; DONNIE E. STONEBREAKER, 

Warden, in individual and official capacity; TERRIE WALLACE, Warden, in 

individual and official capacity; GARY LANE, Warden, in individual and official 

capacity; JOHN PATE, Warden, in individual and official capacity; PATRICIA 

YELDELL, Warden, in individual and official capacity; CORPORAL GAINES, 

Officer, in individual and official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge. (6:19-cv-00804-DCN)

Submitted: July 17, 2020 Decided: July 29, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Herriott, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Herriott appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of 

the magistrate judge and dismissing Herriott’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint under 

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2018). Although our review of the record reveals no reversible 

error, we conclude that the claims against Defendant Donnie Stonebreaker should have 

been dismissed without prejudice.*

 Accordingly, we affirm as modified to reflect a 

dismissal without prejudice as to Stonebreaker. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

* The magistrate judge indicated that, of the 15 named defendants, Herriott raised 

specific allegations against only 2—Stonebreaker and a correctional officer. As a result, 

the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the complaint with prejudice only as to these 

two defendants. It appears, however, that the magistrate judge confused Stonebreaker with 

a nonparty referenced in the complaint. Given that the allegations against Stonebreaker 

were, in fact, indistinguishable from the allegations against the other defendants whom the 

court dismissed without prejudice, we conclude that this was also the appropriate 

disposition for the claims against Stonebreaker.
CHARLES HINES

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3397

__________ ___________________/

Opinion filed January 5, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Suwannee County

. Paul S. Bryan , Judge

.

Charles Hines, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, RAY, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                August 14, 2008  |   | /s/                Bennet P. Tchaikovsky                                              |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                       |   | Bennet                P. TchaikovskyChief                Financial Officer(Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer)                  |

----