alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1851 

To amend section 30123 of title 49, United States Code, to require replacement tires for passenger vehicles to meet the standards required for 

tires on new vehicles. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 6, 2005 

Mr. SALAZAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend section 30123 of title 49, United States Code, 

to require replacement tires for passenger vehicles to 

meet the standards required for tires on new vehicles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FUEL ECONOMY STANDARDS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 30123 of title 49, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(d) FUEL ECONOMY.—(1) Replacement tires for 

8 passenger motor vehicles (as defined in section 32101 of 

9 this title) shall meet the standards required for tires on 
2 

•S 1851 IS

1 new vehicles under part 571 of title 49, Code of Federal 

2 Regulations, including standards affecting fuel economy. 

3 ‘‘(2) Nothing in this section shall apply to— 

4 ‘‘(A) a tire, or a group of tires with the same 

5 SKU number, plant, and year, for which the volume 

6 of tires produced or imported annually is fewer than 

7 15,000; 

8 ‘‘(B) a deep tread, winter-type, snow tire, space 

9 saver tire, or temporary use spare tire; 

10 ‘‘(C) a tire with a normal rim measuring not 

11 more than 12 inches in diameter; 

12 ‘‘(D) a motorcycle tire; or 

13 ‘‘(E) a tire manufactured specifically for use in 

14 an off-road motorized recreational vehicle.’’. 

15 (b) RULEMAKING.—Not later than 180 days after the 

16 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transpor17 tation shall issue a final rule regarding policies and proce18 dures for testing and labeling tires for fuel economy 

19 that— 

20 (1) secures the maximum technically feasible 

21 and cost-effective fuel savings; 

22 (2) does not adversely affect tire safety; 

23 (3) does not adversely affect average tire life; 

24 and 
3 

•S 1851 IS

1 (4) establishes minimum fuel economy stand2 ards for tires. 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall take effect on the expiration of the 

5 date that is 180 days after the date of enactment of this 

6 Act. 

Æ
#### David G. BOGLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-641.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 19, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 13, 1971.

C. J. Abernathy, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Warren H. Petersen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

LILES, A. C. J., and HOBSON and MANN, JJ., concur.
#### Charles S. GRAINGER et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 75-3061.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 25, 1977.

Marvin Cherner, J. Vernon Patrick, Jr., James W. May, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants.

John H. Morrow, George R. Stuart, III, John W. Haley, Birmingham, Ala., for State Sec. et al.

Robert R. Reid, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for L. W. Nimmo & Nimmo Asso., Inc.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING, EN BANC

(Opinion February 18, 1977, 5 Cir., 1977, 547 F.2d 303).

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. *1009The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


The following is a list of the Company's current subsidiaries, all of which are 
wholly-owned:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Organized Under
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidiary Name                              The Laws Of
---------------                              -----------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VideoServer International Inc.               Massachusetts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VideoServer Foreign Sales Corporation        Barbados
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VideoServer Securities Corporation           Massachusetts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is a subsidiary of VideoServer International, Inc. which is 
wholly-owned:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Organized Under
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidiary Name                              The Laws Of
---------------                              -----------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VideoServer Ltd.                             United Kingdom
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NETSCAPE
COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          87,530
<SECURITIES>                                   113,034
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,896)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               348,430
<PP&E>                                         105,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                (19,332)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 537,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          146,316
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                     390,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   537,450
<SALES>                                        291,103
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               346,195
<CGS>                                           36,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               273,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,376
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,453
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,545
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,908
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,908
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 181 (Thursday, September 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49002-49003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24779]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. DR97-5-000]


Northern States Power Company (MN and Subs); Notice of Filing

September 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 19, 1997, Northern States Power Company 
(Minnesota) and its subsidiaries tendered for filing the existing 
Exhibit IX specification of depreciation rates currently used as stated 
in Docket ER97-312-000 and its previous depreciation rates used as 
stated in Docket ER96-226-000.
    NSP believes that previous revised exhibits submitted in Docket 
Nos. ER94-113-000, ER95-147-000, ER96-226-000, and ER97-312-000 satisfy 
the Commission's depreciation rate change filing requirements under 
Section 302 of

[[Page 49003]]

the Federal Power Act. Specifically, the revised exhibits relate to the 
Agreement to Coordinate Planning and Operation and Interchange Power 
and Energy between Northern States Power Company (Minnesota) and 
Northern States Power Company (Wisconsin). Depreciation rate changes 
under Section 302 are for accounting purposes only.
    Exhibit IX sets forth the specification of depreciation rates 
certified by the Wisconsin Public Service Commission (PSCW) and the 
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC). The exhibit shows the 
annual impact of any depreciation rate changes in the form of an annual 
depreciation rate percentage for each utility function.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before October 14, 1997. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make the protestants parties 
in the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24779 Filed 9-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of International Commercial Television
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Kelvin  Claney,  President  and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Karl
Redekopp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that,  to  the  best  of  our  knowledge  and  belief:

1.   the  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   the  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

               Date:  August  19,  2005

                                            Signed: /s/ Kelvin  Claney
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    President and Chief
                                                    Executive  Officer

                                            Signed: /s/ Karl Redekopp
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Susan B. Reilly, certify that:




1.           I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ministry Partners Investment
Company, LLC (the “Company”);




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Company and we have:




(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;




(b)           Intentionally
omitted;




(c)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation;




(d)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter (the
Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
material affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's
internal control over financial reporting; and




5.            The
Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and the Audit Committee of the Company's managers (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):




(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.






Date:
      March 29, 2010
            By: /s/ Susan B
      ReillySusan
      B Reilly,Principal
      Accounting Officer
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Annual Report of TNR Technical, Inc. (the "registrant")
on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Wayne Thaw, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



September  15, 2005


/s/ Wayne Thaw
    ---------------------------
    Wayne Thaw
    Chief Executive Officer
    and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-20433

U.S. METALS, INCORPORATED, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP, INCORPORATED, doing business as Liberty 

Insurance Corporation, 

 Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CV-379

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, OWEN, Circuit Judge, and MORGAN∗, 

District Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

This appeal arises from a dispute between U.S. Metals, Inc., (“U.S.

Metals”) and Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., (“Liberty”) regarding coverage of 

certain damages pursuant to two exclusions in a commercial general liability 

insurance policy (the “CGL Policy” or “Policy”). The district court granted 

 

∗ District Judge of the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 11, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 13-20433 Document: 00513586145 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/11/2016
No. 13-20433

2

summary judgment for Liberty on U.S. Metals’s indemnity claim, in part, on 

the ground that Exclusion M in the Policy precludes coverage for “damage that 

occur[ed] during the replacement process to property other than [the flanges]—

in this case, the temperature coating, the gaskets, the piping, and the 

insulation.” In a prior opinion, we certified four questions to the Supreme 

Court of Texas regarding the proper interpretation of the Policy. See U.S. 

Metals, Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Grp., Inc., 589 F. App’x 659, 663–64 (5th Cir. 2014). 

In answering our certified questions, the Supreme Court of Texas stated:

[t]he diesel units were restored to use by replacing the flanges and 

were therefore impaired property to which Exclusion M applies. 

Thus, their loss of use is not covered by the policy. But the 

insulation and gaskets destroyed in the process were not restored 

to use; they were replaced. They were therefore not impaired 

property to which Exclusion M applied, and the cost of replacing 

them was therefore covered by the policy.

U.S. Metals, Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Grp., Inc., No. 14-0753, 2015 WL 7792557, at 

*7 (Tex. Dec. 4, 2015), reh’g denied (June 17, 2016). The district court therefore 

erred in its holding regarding its interpretation of Exclusion M in the CGL 

Policy. Because the district court’s holdings regarding all of U.S. Metals’s 

claims relate to the interpretation of the Policy’s coverage and exclusions, we 

REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme 

Court of Texas’s opinion.

 Case: 13-20433 Document: 00513586145 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/11/2016
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material                respects the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                                                                      |                                   |
|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                 |                              |
|         |                                                                                                      | /s/ Weibing                    Lu |
|         |                                                                                                           |
|         | Weibing                      Lu Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 22,                      2006  |

----
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the periodic report of Skystar Bio-Pharmaceutical Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael H. Lan, Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company,
hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter
63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
and for the periods indicated.





Date:  August
      16, 2010
              /s/
      Michael H. LanMichael
      H. LanChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form 20-F of
our report dated February 28, 2001 (December 19, 2001, as to paragraph 3 of Note
6 and Note 44), relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Bayer AG which appear in such Registration Statement.


Essen, Germany

January 15, 2002


PwC Deutsche Revision
Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft

<Table>
<S>                                            <C>
/s/ ALBRECHT                                   /s/ SCHILLING
P. Albrecht                                    J. Schilling
Wirtschaftsprufer                              Wirtschaftsprufer
</Table>