alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,049
<PP&E>                                         178,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (31,795)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,970
<BONDS>                                        160,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,990
<OTHER-SE>                                    (47,906)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,254
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   720
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,579
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,529)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,529)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,529)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.007)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.007)


</TABLE>
# LESO - Law Enforcement Support Office

/ Published Feb. 8, 2022

The Law Enforcement Support Office (LESO) facilitates a law enforcement support program, which allows for the transfer of excess Department of Defense property that might otherwise be destroyed to law enforcement agencies across the United States and its territories. Requisitions cover the gamut of items used by America's military -- clothing and office supplies, tools, medical and rescue equipment, vehicles, rifles and others small arms.

## Learn more about the

**Law Enforcement Support Office (LESO) Training**
254 La. 917

#### STATE of Louisiana v. John K. SNYDER.

No. 50242.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1969.

In re: John K. Snyder applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Not considered. See Rule XII of this Court.

HAMITER and McCALEB, JJ.,

are of the opinion that the application should be refused.
#### Barbara GOLDSTEIN v. STATE of Florida, County of Dade.

No. 38882.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Adolor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas P.
Hess, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Thomas P. Hess     
|Thomas P. Hess         
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 4, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ending  March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Paul W. Andre,  Treasurer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: April 27, 2006



                                        By: /s/ PAUL W. ANDRE
                                            ___________________________
                                                Paul W. Andre
                                                Treasurer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Gunther Than, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of View Systems,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.



                                     /s/ Gunther Than
Date: November 10, 2005              ________________________________________
                                     Gunther Than, Principal Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Tex as

September 8 , 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00544

- CV

IN RE James B. MCCOY

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Relators filed this petition for writ of mandamus on August 24, 2016. O n September 1,

2016, Responden t filed a response which advised that the issue raised by the mandamus petition

h as become moot . Accordingly, t his original mandamus proceeding is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

It is so ORDERED on September 8, 2016

.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of September, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle , Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016

- CI

- 08270, styled James B. McCoy v. Patrick Camacho , pending in

the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr. presiding.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 181 (Thursday, September 18, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48952-48953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24847]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs Administration

49 CFR Part 193

[Docket No. PS-151; Notice 2]
RIN 2137-AC 88


Liquefied Natural Gas Regulations--Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA), DOT.

ACTION: Confirmation of effective date of Direct Final Rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the amendments of 
the direct final rule which incorporated safety requirements for mobile 
and temporary LNG facilities by referencing National Fire Protection 
Association (NAPA) Standard 59A (1996 edition), Standard for the 
Production, Storage and Handling of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG).

EFFECTIVE DATES: This document confirms October 15, 1997, as the 
effective date of the addition of Sec. 193.2019 to part 193 in the 
direct final rule, published on August 1, 1997, at 62 FR 41312.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Israni, telephone: (202) 366-
4571, or e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#781511131d56110b0a191611380a0b0819561c170c561f170e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="34595d5f511a5d4746555a5d74464744551a505b401a535b42">[email protected]</span></a>, regarding the subject matter 
of this document, or the Dockets Unit (202) 366-5046, for copies of 
this document or other information in the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 1, 1997, RSPA published a direct final rule (62 FR 41312) 
titled ``Liquefied Natural Gas Regulations--Miscellaneous Amendments.'' 
In that rule, RSPA stated that if no adverse comments were received by 
September

[[Page 48953]]

2, 1997, it would publish a confirmation notice in the Federal Register 
by September 30, 1997, and if an adverse comment was received, RSPA 
would issue a notice to confirm that fact and would withdraw the direct 
final rule in whole or in part. The rule also stated that RSPA might 
then incorporate the adverse comment(s) into a subsequent direct final 
rule or might publish a notice of proposed rulemaking.
    RSPA received three comments. All commenters supported RSPA's 
action on mobile and temporary LNG facilities. There were no adverse 
comments. Therefore, this document confirms the addition of 
Sec. 193.2019 to part 193 in the direct final rule, effective October 
15, 1997.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 15, 1997.
Richard B. Felder,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 97-24847 Filed 9-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Ex parte Barbara H. PLASKETT.

SC 2754.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 19, 1977.

EMBRY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, JONES and ALMON, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2461]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m. (EST), February 10, 1997.

PLACE: 4th Floor, Conference Room 4506, 1250 H Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

    1. Approval of the minutes of the January 13, 1997, Board member 
meeting.
    2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive 
Director.
    3. Review of investment policy.
    4. Review of KPMG Peat Marwick audit report: ``Pension and 
Welfare Benefits Administration Review of Thrift Savings Plan C and 
F Fund Investment Management Operations at Barclays Global 
Investors, N.A.''

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: January 28, 1997.
Roger W. Mehle,
Executive Director, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 97-2461 Filed 1-28-97; 2:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-M
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Holdings, Inc.    By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Executive Officer,
and DirectorDate:Nov. 19, 2009By:/s/ Dempsey MorkName:Dempsey MorkTitle:Principal Financial OfficerDate:Nov. 19, 2009
#### Jesus GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. GENERAL ACCIDENT FIRE AND LIFE ASSURANCE CORP., Ltd., a Pennsylvania corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-438.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 13, 1970.

Edward B. Johnson, Jr., and Jeanne Hey-ward, Miami, for appellant.

Fowler, White, Collins, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam, and Henry Burnett, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reversed a summary final judgment in this case and remanded it for trial in Gonzalez v. General Accident Fire and Life Assur. Corp., Fla.App.1969, 216 So.2d 797. Many of the pertinent facts, dates and issues to be tried on remand were set forth therein.

After a non-jury trial the judge entered a final judgment for garnishee and found that the garnishee (insurance company) had properly imposed the surcharge in question; had followed the applicable cancellation procedure; had not waived the cancellation of the policy and that the garnishor (Gonzalez) had failed to prove his case in fact or law, accordingly, he ordered the writ of garnishment dissolved.

Gonzalez, by this appeal, argues that the trial court erred in failing to enter a final judgment in his favor and in entering a final judgment for the insurance company.

We have reviewed the conflicting testimony and evidence and find substantial and competent evidence to support the findings of fact and the conclusions of law based on these findings. See Peacock v. Peacock, Fla.App.1968, 207 So.2d 292.

The final judgment herein appealed is

Affirmed.
#### COCONUT GROVES BANK v. M. R. HARRISON CONSTRUCTION CO.

No. 39052.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 226 So.2d 120.
# Euroopa Liidu C 93I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 093I |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 64. aastakäik19. märts 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 093I

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

64. aastakäik19. märts 2021

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | Parandused |
| | Euroopa Parlamendi, nõukogu ja Euroopa Komisjoni ühisavaldus Euroopa tuleviku teemalise konverentsi kohta — Demokraatiale suunatud koostöö kodanikega – vastupanuvõimelisema Euroopa ülesehitamine, parandus ( ELT C 91 I, 18.3.2021 ) | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

Parandused

Euroopa Parlamendi, nõukogu ja Euroopa Komisjoni ühisavaldus Euroopa tuleviku teemalise konverentsi kohta — Demokraatiale suunatud koostöö kodanikega – vastupanuvõimelisema Euroopa ülesehitamine, parandus ( ELT C 91 I, 18.3.2021 )

( ELT C 91 I, 18.3.2021 )

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

Parandused

| 19.3.2021 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CI 93/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2021

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CI 93/1

---

Euroopa Parlamendi, nõukogu ja Euroopa Komisjoni ühisavaldus Euroopa tuleviku teemalise konverentsi kohta — Demokraatiale suunatud koostöö kodanikega – vastupanuvõimelisema Euroopa ülesehitamine, parandus

(
  Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 91 I, 18. märts 2021
  )

(2021/C 93 I/01)

Kaanel, sisukorras ja leheküljel 1 pealkirjas

asendatakse

„EUROOPA PARLAMENT”

järgmisega:

„EUROOPA PARLAMENT

NÕUKOGU

EUROOPA KOMISJON”.

---
Exhibit  32.1
                                                                  -------------

                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                              A Nevada corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Penny
Perfect, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




         Dated: May 11, 2007                    /s/ Penny Perfect
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Its: Chief Executive Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
         other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
         signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
         this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
         retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are
         accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906
         of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
         1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
         filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.














                             Exhibit 32.1 - 1 (21)
# EUR-Lex - 42000X1212 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 42000X1212

**Conclusions of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 4 December 2000 on combating doping **

*
Official Journal C 356 , 12/12/2000 P. 0001 - 0001 *

Conclusions of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council

of 4 December 2000

on combating doping

(2000/C 356/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES, IN AGREEMENT WITH THE COMMISSION,

(1) EMPHASISE the importance of measures to combat doping in sport, as acknowledged by the European Union, in the conclusions of the European Council in Vienna on 11 and 12 December 1998. The European Council's conclusions underlined "its concern at the extent and seriousness of doping in sport, which undermines the sporting ethic and endangers public health. It emphasises the need for mobilisation at European level and invites the Member States to examine jointly with the Commission and international sports bodies possible measures to intensify the fight against this danger ...".

(2) NOTE the recent developments in this area and the creation of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), and WADA's intention to become an international body based on public international law, and consider that arrangements should be made for the Member States' and the European Union's roles in that body in order to ensure that they are suitably represented on its Foundation Board.

(3) AGREE that the European Community and its Member States will be represented by the President-in-Office of the Council and a member of the Commission. Within a reasonable period of time before each meeting, coordination will take place under the responsibility of the Presidency. The Commission member will be able to speak on matters within the Community's sphere of competence in accordance with the Treaty and the case-law of the Court of Justice (given that there is no direct Community competence in the area of sport). The content of the statements made by the Commission member will be approved in accordance with the principles referred to above and following the customary procedures. Where appropriate, the Commission member may speak on matters which are not within the Community's sphere of competence, along the lines approved by a consensus of the Member States and in addition to the Presidency.

(4) NOTE that any Community expenditure on activities of WADA involving measures within the Community's sphere of competence will be decided in accordance with the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline. In particular, any significant Community expenditure will require the adoption, following a proposal from the Commission, of a measure with an appropriate legal basis.

(5) CONSIDER that the Member States should encourage cooperation between the competent authorities at national level on efforts to combat doping in sport.