alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Refuge

National Wildlife Refuge

Arctic

Conserving the Nature of America

AMERICA’S NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM... Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

907/456 0250 800/362 4546

arctic_refuge@fws.gov

http://arctic.fws.gov/

Bird Migration Routes

Many North American birds come to 

the far northern regions of the continent 

in summer to reproduce and raise their 

young. Long summer days in the north 

produce an abundance of insects and 

plants for birds and their young to eat. 

Because this food is not available during 

cold, winter months, many birds migrate 

south to forage in warmer climates.

These birds follow migratory routes, 

called flyways, between their northern 

breeding grounds and southern wintering 

areas. There are four major flyways 

in North America: the Pacific, Central, 

Mississippi and Atlantic Flyway.

Maps of these flyways often show only 

the central portion of the North American 

continent. These maps provide no 

information about more northern areas. 

The large map on the right shows how 

portions of all four flyways overlap in 

the Arctic Refuge. This overlap connects 

the Refuge to bird-wintering areas 

throughout Canada, the lower 48 states 

and beyond. 

King Eiders at their tundra nest

(An animated version of this map is 

available on the web at 

<http://arctic.fws.gov/birdmig.htm>.)

The Refuge’s information sheet titled 

“Which birds may travel from the Arctic 

Refuge to or through your area?” shows 

that birds breeding on the Arctic Refuge 

have ranges that reach all 50 states. Birds 

follow routes in all four flyways as they 

migrate between the Arctic Refuge and 

their southern wintering areas in these 

states.
CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gaofeng Gold, Corp. for the quarter ended July 31, 2004, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:
  (1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Gaofeng Gold, Corp. for the quarter ended July 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2004, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gaofeng Gold, Corp.  /s/ Frank Mashburn
 By: _____ ___________________
 Name: Frank Mashburn
 Title: President
 Date: September 10, 2004
   /s/ Karl Harz
 By: ________________________
 Name: Karl Harz
 Title: Chief Financial Officer
 Date: September 10, 2004
exhibit10-3.htm


 










Exhibit 10.3


 


AMENDMENT TO



TAPIMMUNE INC.


2014 OMNIBUS STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN







           Pursuant to the authority reserved to the Board of Directors in Section 24 of the TapImmune Inc. 2014 Omnibus Stock Ownership Plan (the “Plan”), the Company hereby amends the terms of the Plan in the following manner, effective as of November 6, 2015, in order to increase the number of shares of common stock the Company is authorized to issue pursuant to the Plan and to make certain other changes approved by the Board.







1.           Section 3 of the Plan (“Scope of this Plan”) is amended to revise the first sentence of Subsection 3(a) to read as follows:







“As of March 18, 2014, no shares were available for future grant under Prior Plans. As of the date this Plan became effective, 2 million shares, and any shares which may be returned to the Prior Plans as described in (d) below, became available for future grants under this Plan.  An additional 5 million shares shall be reserved for future grants under this Plan, bringing the total number of shares of Stock which may be delivered to Grantees pursuant to this Plan up to a total of seven million shares, plus any shares which may be returned to the Prior Plans as described in (d) below, subject to the other provisions of this Section 3 and to adjustment as provided in Section 22.







2.           Subsection 1(v) of the Plan (defining the term “Minimum Vesting Requirement”) is amended to read as follows:








    “(v)    “Minimum Vesting Requirement” means that the Awards subject to the Minimum Vesting Requirement shall not become nonforfeitable prior to the six month anniversary of the Grant Date or such other vesting date as the Committee may, in its discretion, expressly designate for an Award, subject to Sections 12, 13, and 21.”









3.           Section 6 of the Plan (“Conditions to Grants”) is amended to revise Subsection 6(c) to read as follows:








    “The Committee may, in its discretion, grant shares of Stock to any Employee or Consultant eligible under Section 5 to receive Awards.”













4.           Section 6 is further amended to revise the fifth sentence of Subsection 6(f) to read as follows:










“If the value of such an Award is based on the full value of a share of Stock, and the Award is a Service-Vesting Award, then unless the Committee, in its discretion, expressly determines otherwise, the Award shall be subject to the Minimum Vesting Requirement.”
















 


  





  











  













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officer to sign this Amendment to the TapImmune Inc. 2014 Omnibus Stock Ownership Plan on its behalf this 6th day of November, 2015.







TAPIMMUNE, INC.







/s/ Glynn Wilson


Glynn Wilson, President & CEO
#### In the Matter of the Claims of James D. PARKER et al., Sherman Brumfield et al., Joseph Bagent et al. v. Joseph R. GERACE, Administrator.

No. 60203.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 6, 1977.

In re: James D. Parker et al., Sherman Brumfield et al., Joseph Bagent et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Washington. 346 So.2d 855.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MOHAMMED NAZIR BIN LEP,

Petitioner,

v. Civil Action No. 09-0031 (JDB)

BARACK OBAMA, et al.,

 Respondents.

ORDER GRANTING STAY OF CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE

Upon consideration of Petitioner's Unopposed Motion to Stay the Case Management

Schedule, and finding good cause therefor, it is hereby

ORDERED that said motion is granted and that the deadlines established in the Case

Management Order filed April 30, 2010 ("CMO") are stayed; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that by no later than April 1, 2012, Petitioner shall submit to

the Court a proposed schedule to govern further proceedings in this case and/or a joint status

report on the scheduling of further proceedings in this case; and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that during the pendency of this stay, Petitioner may confer

with Respondents regarding potential discovery pursuant to CMO § I.E.2 or, if necessary, file a

single I.E.2. motion on a schedule to be proposed at the time the motion, if any, is filed; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that aside from the stay of the deadlines in the CMO, all other

aspects of the CMO shall remain in full force and effect.

SO ORDERED.
 /s/ 

JOHN D. BATES

 United States District Judge

Date: October 3, 2011

-2-
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Diatom Corporation, a Nevada corporation
      (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the second quarter ended June 30, 2006
       as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, J.
      Dan Sifford Sole Officer/Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my
      knowledge:






(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      Aug 3, 2006






/s/J.
      Dan Sifford


J.
      Dan
      Sifford


Sole
      Officer/Director
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Christopher L. Nelson, certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of VCampus Corporation;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a.                  designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b.                 evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.                  disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s independent registered public accounting firmand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a.                  all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b.                 anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: March 29, 2005 | By:    | /s/ CHRISTOPHER L. NELSON  |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                      |   | Christopher L.  Nelson     |
|                      |   | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(a)


STEPHEN E. ROTH
DIRECT LINE: (202) 383-0158
Internet: sroth@sablaw.com


                                January 15, 2002

VIA EDGAR TRANSMISSION
----------------------

Board of Directors
GE Life and Annuity
 Assurance Company
6610 West Broad Street
Richmond, VA 23230

          Re:   GE Life & Annuity Separate Account 4
                ------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

          We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption
"Legal Matters" in the Statement of Additional Information filed as part of Pre-
Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 filed by GE
Life & Annuity Separate Account 4 for certain scheduled purchase payment
variable deferred annuity contracts (File No. 333-67904).  In giving this
consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is
required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.

                              Very truly yours,

                              SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP



                              By:  /s/ Stephen E. Roth
                                 -----------------------------------------
                                 Stephen E. Roth
# DLA CIO presents “Enterprise Enablers” IT strategy to Troop Support workforce

/ Published June 18, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 
The Defense Logistics Agency’s chief information officer talked to the DLA Troop Support workforce in Philadelphia June 12 about keeping the agency’s complex information systems secure while also taking advantage of the latest technology.

Kathy Cutler spoke during a town hall hosted by Army Brig. Gen. Mark Simerly, DLA Troop Support commander. (See full story about commander’s town hall.)

She presented the “Enterprise Enablers Strategy,” the agency’s IT plan to combat increased cybersecurity threats combined with an unprecedented pace of innovation. She said security is foremost on the minds of the J6 Information Operations team.

“We have to protect the data (and) have to protect our systems,” she said. “And bad guys are getting smarter everyday about how to get into our system and get information that they shouldn’t have.”

The technology is also changing too fast for J6 to keep up, she said.

“So it’s certainly something we need to figure out how we can position the agency in order to take advantage of the newer technology as it changes,” Cutler said.

J6 has five guiding principles for the strategy:
      -  Information Technology as a Service: the IT service provider delivers IT service like a commodity, such as DLA email and the Learning Management System 
      -  Eliminate Government off-the-Shelf: eliminate purchasing technology created by the government 
      -  Minimized Infrastructure: DLA doesn’t need to own all networks or devices 
      -  Data as an Asset: how to make DOD-wide data available to all to help make better business decisions in support of the warfighter. 
      -  Challenge the Status Quo: question whether a process is the best way to get something done 

J6 is focusing on systems availability and response times, Cutler said, including monitoring the military services’ systems and other non-DLA supply systems. The Service Readiness Dashboard, which provides DLA personnel a near real-time view of weapons systems and platforms, and the Single Point of Entry are two recent tools added to improve the IT experience. 

One IT product that’s now being tested within J6 is DLA GO, a single sign-on portal that employees go to for IT capabilities instead of searching for each system. So when an employee goes to enter time and attendance, instead of going to the Eagle system, the employee selects the capability through the portal.

The portal is also tailored to a job, such as an acquisition specialist, and the systems an employee in that career field needs.  

J6 also plans to be able to develop solutions faster than the current systems change request process, Cutler said, with a process that will enable delivery in weeks and months, not years. 

More tools are on the way to speed up IT resolutions, including VAL, a virtual agent where employees will be able to chat with a live J6 technician. 

Cutler also answered employees’ questions during the town hall. Those questions and answers will be compiled on the Troop Support Q&A page on eWorkplace as soon as possible.
Exhibit






Cenveo, Inc.
200 First Stamford Place
2nd Floor
Stamford, CT 06902
(203) 595-3000




April 24, 2015




Mr. Robert G. Burton
200 First Stamford Place
2nd Floor
Stamford CT  06902




Dear Bob:


Reference is made to the employment agreement (the “Employment Agreement”), dated October 27, 2005, as amended, between you and Cenveo, Inc. (the “Company”).   This letter agreement (the “Amendment”) will serve to amend the Employment Agreement in the following respects, effective as of the date of this letter.  (Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment will have the same meaning as in the Employment Agreement.)


		
	1.
	The first sentence of Section 1 (“Terms of Employment”) of the Employment Agreement is amended to extend the Term of the Employment Agreement by two (2) years by replacing the current expiration date “December 31, 2015,” with the date “December 31, 2017.”




The Employment Agreement otherwise remains in full force and effect.  This
Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which will constitute an original, and all of which together will constitute one and the same. 


If the foregoing terms and conditions are acceptable and agreed to by you, please sign the 
line provided below to signify such acceptance and agreement and return the executed copy to the undersigned.  













CENVEO, INC.






By:      /s/ Mark Griffin            
Name:     Mark Griffin
Title:     Director and Chairperson of 
               Compensation  Committee   








Accepted and Agreed this 
30th day of April, 2015








/s/ Robert G. Burton, Sr.            
Robert G. Burton, Sr.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLow-speed performance of an axisymmetric, mixed-compression, supersonic inlet with auxiliary inletsA test program was conducted to determine the aerodynamic performance and acoustic characteristics associated with the low-speed operation of a supersonic, axisymmetric, mixed-compression inlet with auxiliary inlets. Blow-in-auxiliary doors were installed on the NASA Ames P inlet. One door per quadrant was located on the cowl in the subsonic diffuser selection of the inlet. Auxiliary inlets with areas of 20 and 40 percent of the inlet capture area were tested statically and at free-stream Mach numbers of 0.1 and 0.2. The effects of boundary layer bleed inflow were investigated. A JT8D fan simulator driven by compressed air was used to pump inlet flow and to provide a characteristic noise signature. Baseline data were obtained at static free-stream conditions with the sharp P-inlet cowl lip replaced by a blunt lip. Auxiliary inlets increased overall total pressure recovery of the order of 10 percent.Document ID19860015223Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsTrefny, C. J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Wasserbauer, J. W.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1986Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberE-2771NAS 1.60:2557NASA-TP-2557Accession Number86N24694Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-43-52Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860015223.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 99.6
  
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Algoma Steel Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Denis Turcotte, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 By:
*Denis Turcotte*Denis TurcottePresident and Chief Executive Officer
  May 20, 2004
#### Hubert A. ARONSON, Appellant, v. Layha S. ARONSON, Appellee.

No. 69-690.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 21, 1969.

Beckham & McAliley, Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for appellant.

Heiman & Crary, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal from a final judgment of divorce the appellant husband urges error in that portion of the judgment which granted custody of two minor children to the appellee wife. Appellant recognizes that this is an area of the law in which the decision of the trial judge comes to the appellate court clothed with a strong presumption of correctness. He urges nevertheless that the weight of the evidence is such that the decision of the trial judge amounted to an abuse of discretion. Our review of the record convinces us that there is sufficient evidence to support the finding of the chancellor and that for us to reverse his finding would amount to a substitution of our judgment for his in a conflicting factual situation. We therefore hold that error has not been demonstrated. See Mehaffey v. Mehaffey, 143 Fla. 157, 196 So. 416 (1940).

Appellant presents one additional point urging error upon the court’s refusal to admit into evidence certain documents. We find that error is not demonstrated.

Affirmed.
# Weekly Bulletin 2018

Share This Page:

## December

- 12/28/2018
- 12/22/2018
- 12/15/2018
- 12/08/2018
- 12/01/2018

## November

- 11/24/2018
- 11/17/2018
- 11/10/2018
- 11/03/2018

## October

- 10/27/2018
- 10/20/2018
- 10/13/2018
- 10/06/2018

## September

- 09/29/2018
- 09/22/2018
- 09/15/2018
- 09/08/2018
- 09/01/2018

## August

- 08/25/2018
- 08/18/2018
- 08/11/2018
- 08/04/2018

## July

- 07/28/2018
- 07/21/2018
- 07/14/2018
- 07/07/2018

## June

- 06/30/2018
- 06/23/2018
- 06/16/2018
- 06/09/2018
- 06/02/2018

## May

- 05/26/2018
- 05/19/2018
- 05/12/2018
- 05/05/2018

## April

- 04/28/2018
- 04/21/2018
- 04/14/2018
- 04/07/2018

## March

- 03/31/2018
- 03/24/2018
- 03/17/2018
- 03/10/2018
- 03/03/2018

## February

- 02/24/2018
- 02/17/2018
- 02/10/2018
- 02/03/2018

## January

- 01/27/2018
- 01/20/2018
- 01/13/2018
- 01/06/2018

## View All Weekly Bulletins

          - 2024
          - 2023
          - 2022
          - 2021
          - 2020
          - 2019
          - 2018
          - 2017
          - 2016
          - 2015

          - 2014
          - 2013
          - 2012
          - 2011
          - 2010
          - 2009
          - 2008
          - 2007
          - 2006
          - 2005

          - 2004
          - 2003
          - 2002
          - 2001
          - 2000
          - 1999
          - 1998
          - 1997
          - 1996
No. 00-7309.

#### Ibarra-Galindo *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.