alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                         MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION

I, Pamela Lindquist, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of DOLPHIN
PRODUCTIONS, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statement were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the"Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and the registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses.



                         DOLPHIN PRODUCTIONS, INC.

Date: February 11, 2003                     /s/ Pamela Lindquist

                                            ------------------------
                                            Pamela Lindquist, Vice President
                                            and Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 99.9**

 

**Section 906 Certification**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

*18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:*

 

In connection with this annualreport of VCampus Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the datehereof, the undersigned, in his capacity and on the date indicated below,hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

1.             This report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934: and

 

2.             The information contained in thisreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of VCampus Corporation as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report.

 
| Date: March  28, 2003 |                      |
|-----------------------|---------------------------|
|                  |                      |
|                  |                      |
|                  | /s/ CHRIST0PHER L. NELSON |   |
|                  | Christopher L. Nelson     |   |
|                  | *Chief Financial Officer* |   |

 

----
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 42972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21067]

[[Page 42972]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-64-009]

Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Compliance 
Filing

August 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 1, 1997, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of 
America (Natural) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 200 and 
Substitute Fourth Revised Sheet No. 247A, to be effective November 1, 
1997.
    Natural states that the purpose of the filing is to comply with the 
Commission's letter order issued July 23, 1997, in Docket No. RP97-64-
007.
    Natural states that copies of the filing are being mailed to its 
customers, interested state regulatory agencies, and all parties set 
out on the official service list at Docket No. RP97-64.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21067 Filed 8-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Employment Outlook in the Men's Tailored Clothing Industry

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Employment Outlook in the Men's Tailored Clothing Industry : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1010*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1951,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4417,			accessed on September 24, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Patrick D Matthews,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Primary Business Systems, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  November 13, 2003 | /s/  Patrick  D Matthews |   |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                          | Patrick  D Matthews                |
|                          | Chief  Financial Officer           |

 

----
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 47617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23957]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 773

RIN 1029-AB80

Notification and Permit Processing

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: After reviewing comments received during the public comment 
period, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) 
is withdrawing the proposed Notification and Permit Processing rule 
published in the Federal Register on October 26, 1994 (59 FR 53884).

DATES: This withdrawal is effective September 10, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Boyce, 1951 Constitution Avenue, 
N.W., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone: (202) 208-2986 commercial or 
FTS. E-mail: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a letter dated September 29, 1992, Mr. 
Jim B. Wyant of Vincennes, Indiana, presented a petition for rulemaking 
to OSM. The ``Notice of availability of a petition to initiate 
rulemaking and request for comment'' was published in the Federal 
Register on November 12, 1992 (57 FR 53670). On August 24, 1993 (58 FR 
44630), the Director of OSM published his ``Notice of decision on 
petition for rulemaking'' and stated that OSM would initiate Federal 
rulemaking. The proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on 
October 26, 1994 (59 FR 53884), and would have revised the permit 
notification provisions of 30 CFR 773.15 and the permit processing 
provisions of 30 CFR 773.15(c) and 773.17. On December 23, 1994 (59 FR 
66287), OSM extended the comment period for the proposed rule until 
February 27, 1995. In order to accommodate requests for a public 
hearing the comment period was reopened on March 10, 1995, and extended 
until March 23, 1995. A public hearing was held on March 16, 1995, in 
Vincennes, Indiana.
    Comments on the proposed rulemaking reveal that there are no 
widespread problems with the existing rules that warrant a national 
rulemaking. Accordingly, the proposed rule published on October 26, 
1994 (59 FR 53884), is withdrawn.

    Dated: September 4, 1997.
Bob Armstrong,
Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 97-23957 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-M
```
#### Robert Michael REILLY and Charles Franklin Gibson, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 2065, 2066.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

April 10, 1969.

Rehearing Denied May 20, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 181 (Thursday, September 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24754]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 United States Code, Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of 
the following meeting:

    Name of Committee: Communication Disorders Review Committee.
    Date: October 22-24, 1997.
    Time: October 22 and 23--8 am-5 pm, October 24--8 am to 
adjournment.
    Place: Double Tree Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact person: Melissa Stick, Ph.D., M.P.H., Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIDCD/DEA/SRB, EPS 400C, 6120 Executive Boulevard, 
MSC 7180, Bethesda MD 20892-7180, 301-496-8683.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, United States 
Code. The applications and/or proposals and the discussion could 
reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of 
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.173 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communication Disorders)

    Dated: September 12, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-24754 Filed 9-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00409

- CV

ISABELLE EDWARDS APPELLANT

V.

CENTERPOINT APARTMEN TS COMPLEX APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 393RD DISTR ICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 14

- 06020

- 393

--------- ---



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------
On June 08, 2015, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P.

38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for w ant of prosecution unless

appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant ’ s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 16, 2015
January 21, 2016

Administrator Federal Aviation Administration Re: Exemption No
. ( Status Pending) Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2016

-0673 Dear Sir or Madam: Please accept this as formal petition to amend Wired Technology Company LLC's (hereinafter petitioner or operator) pending S e ction 333 E xemption , listed under Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2016

- 0673, to add the following sUAS: DJI Inspire 1 DJI Phantom 3 DJI Phantom 2 DJI S1000 3DR Solo 3DR X8

- M 3DR IRIS SensFly ebee SensFly exom PrecisionHawk Hawk Eye Lancaster Trimble UX5 Swift Radioplane Lynx M The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the DJI Inspire 1 in Exemption No. 11295 (RoboFlight Systems LLC). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the DJI Phantom 2 in Exemption No. 11260 (First Flight Photography, LLC). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the DJI Phantom 3 in Exemption No. 12997 (New England Studio LLC). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the DJI S1000 in Exemption No. 11881 (Empire Unm anned LLC). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the 3DR Solo in Exemption No. 11832 (AUV, LLC). The FAA has previously determined the airworthiness of the 3DR X8

- M in Exemption No. 12084 (Robert B. Dreer). The FAA previously determined the a irworthiness of the 3DR IRIS in Exemption No. 12368 (Dark Technologies, LLC). (The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the Sensfly ebee in Exemption No. 11263 (SensFly Ltd.). The FAA Previously determined the airworthiness of the SensFly exom in Exemption No. 11263A (SensFly Ltd.) The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the PrecisionHawk HawkEye Lancaster in Exemption No. 11273 (AIG PC Global Services, Inc.). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the Trimble UX5 in Exempti on No. 11110 (Trimble navigation LTD.). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the Swift Radioplane Lynx M in Exemption No. 11432A (Compass Data, Inc.). All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of our cur rently pending FAA S e ction 333 E xemption , listed under Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2016

- 0673 . Since the requested amendment to Wired Technology Company LLC’s pending exemption would not set any precedent or raise any novel issue, and because petitioner seeks to begin these operations with minimal delay, Wired Technology Company LLC respectfully requests the FAA to determine that good cause exists to grant therequested amendment expeditiously by summary means along with the initial exemption request listed

un der Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2016

- 0673. Based on the foregoing, Petitioner hereby requests that the FAA grant this petition and provide such further relief as deemed appropriate for the operations proposed herein. Please let me know if you require addit ional information in support of this petition.
Sincerely, 

## Stuart D. Finlay Stuart Finlay Wired Technology Company LLC Attn: Stuart Finlay 771 Inman Mews Drive NE Atlanta, GA 30307 stuart@wiredtechco.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

HAN TAK LEE, :

Petitioner :

: CIVIL NO. 4:08-CV-1972

v. :

: (JUDGE NEALON)

KEN CAMERON, : (MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARLSON)

SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL., :

Respondents :

ORDER

NOW, THIS 5th

 DAY OF MARCH, 2015, for the reasons stated in the 

Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The rationale of the Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 109), is

ADOPTED;

2. Petitioner’s motion for an indicative ruling under Rule 62.1 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the writ has become absolute,

(Doc. 107), is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and

3. The matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson for

further proceedings.

/s/ William J. Nealon 

United States District Judge

Case 4:08-cv-01972-WJN Document 112 Filed 03/05/15 Page 1 of 1
254 La. 1100

#### George L. BLADE v. Leo MERVIS and Celia Mervis, individually, and doing business as a co-partnership under the name and title of Southern Siding Company and Housecraft.

No. 50183.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 19, 1969.

In re: George L. Blade applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 226 So.2d 552.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5072-5073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2517]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

Agency Information Collection: Submission for OMB Review; Comment 
Request

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of 
Veterans Affairs, has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) the following proposal for the collection of information under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0156.
    Titles and Form Numbers: Notice of Change in Student Status, VA 
Forms 22-1999b and 22-1999b-1.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Need and Uses: The information collected on the forms is used by 
the VA to determine if a claimant's educational benefits are to be 
increased, decreased, or terminated. Without this information, the VA 
might underpay or overpay benefits.
    Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal Government--Business or 
other for-profit--Not-for-profit institutions.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 73,181 hours.
    Estimated Total Average Burden Per Respondent: 5 minutes.

[[Page 5073]]

    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Number of Responses: 878,174.
    Estimated Total Number of Respondents: 7,481.

ADDRESSES: A copy of this submission may be obtained from Ron Taylor, 
VA Clearance Officer (045A4), Department of Veterans Affairs, 8l0 
Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-8015.
    Comments and recommendations concerning this submission should be 
directed to VA's OMB Desk Officer, Allison Eydt, OMB Human Resources 
and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 
Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-4650. DO NOT send requests for benefits 
to this address.

DATES: Comments on the information collection should be directed to the 
OMB Desk Officer by March 5, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Taylor, VA Clearance Officer 
(045A4), (202) 273-8015.

    Dated: January 13, 1997.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Donald L. Neilson,
Director, Information Management Service.
[FR Doc. 97-2517 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
```