alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7387

HULON DOTSON, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

WARDEN, McCormick Correctional Institution, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. 

(4:08-cv-03807-HFF) 

Submitted: October 21, 2009 Decided: November 17, 2009 

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Hulon Dotson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant 

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Hulon Dotson seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice 

of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period 

is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 

205, 214 (2007). 

The district court’s order was entered on its docket 

on April 24, 2009. The notice of appeal was filed, at the 

earliest, on June 16, 2009,* fifty-three days later. Because 

Dotson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an 

extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

 *

 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 

276 (1988). 

2 
3 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
# Официален вестник C 140I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0855 |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 140I |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 6421 април 2021 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 140I

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 6421 април 2021 г.

---

| Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- |
| | Поправки |
| | Поправка на Европейска агенция за безопасност и здраве при работа (EU-OSHA), Билбао — Обява за свободно работно място за длъжността изпълнителен директор (срочно нает служител — степен AD 14) — COM/2020/20049 ( OB C 171 A, 19.5.2020 г. ) | 1 |

Съдържание

Страница

Поправки

Поправка на Европейска агенция за безопасност и здраве при работа (EU-OSHA), Билбао — Обява за свободно работно място за длъжността изпълнителен директор (срочно нает служител — степен AD 14) — COM/2020/20049 ( OB C 171 A, 19.5.2020 г. )

( OB C 171 A, 19.5.2020 г. )

1

---

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

Поправки

| 21.4.2021 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | CI 140/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2021

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

CI 140/1

---

Поправка на Европейска агенция за безопасност и здраве при работа (EU-OSHA), Билбао — Обява за свободно работно място за длъжността изпълнителен директор (срочно нает служител — степен AD 14) — COM/2020/20049

(
  Официален вестник на Европейския съюз C 171 A от 19 май 2020 г.
  )

(2021/C 140 I/01)

На страница 4 шестата алинея

вместо:

„Преди управителният съвет да назначи един от кандидатите от списъка, те ще бъдат помолени да се явят пред отговорните органи на Съвета и комисията на Европейския парламент и да отговорят на въпроси от тяхна страна. След това Европейският парламент и Съветът на Европейския съюз ще представят своите становища и ще обявят реда на своите предпочитания. Управителният съвет ще назначи изпълнителния директор, след като вземе тези становища предвид.“

да се чете:

„Избраният кандидат се приканва да направи изявление пред Европейския парламент и да отговори на въпроси, поставени от членовете на Парламента.“

---
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2435]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3658]

Dell Computer Corporation; Prohibited Trade Practices, and 
Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of competition 
this consent order prohibits, among other things, a Texas-based 
personal computer manufacturer from enforcing its patent rights against 
computer manufacturers using the VL-bus, a mechanism to transfer 
instructions between the computer's central processing unit and its 
peripherals.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued May 20, 1996.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint, the Decision and Order, and 
Commissioner Azcuenaga's statement and the statement of the 
Commission are available from the Commission's Public Reference 
Branch, H-130, 6th Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20580.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Baer, FTC/H-374, Washington, DC 20580. (202) 326-2932.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Wednesday, November 22, 1995, there was 
published ion the Federal Register, 60 FR 57870, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Dell Computer Corporation, for 
the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties were given 
sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or objections 
regarding the proposed form of the order.
    Comments were filed and considered by the Commission. The 
Commission has ordered the issuance of the complaint in the form 
contemplated by the agreement, made its jurisdictional findings and 
entered a slightly modified order to cease and desist in disposition of 
this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2435 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1879 

To amend title 11, United States Code, to limit claims in bankruptcy by 

certain unsecured creditors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2005 

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 11, United States Code, to limit claims in 

bankruptcy by certain unsecured creditors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bankruptcy Prevention 

5 Credit Counseling Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF UNSECURED CLAIMS. 

7 Section 502(b) of title 11, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (8), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

10 end; 
2 

•S 1879 IS

1 (2) in paragraph (9), by striking the period at 

2 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(10) such consumer debt is an unsecured 

5 claim arising from a debt to a creditor that does not 

6 have, as of the date of the order for relief, a policy 

7 of waiving additional interest for all debtors who 

8 participate in a debt management plan administered 

9 by a nonprofit budget and credit counseling agency 

10 described in section 111(a).’’. 

Æ
## 14910-13-Pj DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration IDocket No. FAA-2010-+++++; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-229-ADI RlN 2120-AA64 14CFR Part 39 

# /311 Mill

# il'l- 

# 'r?;J-.u:J " 

## 'I 10 Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 757 Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). 

## /O/'4/lPIO SUMMARY: The FAA. proposes to supersede an existing ain:\'orthiness directive {AD"



## \ 10 ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM).

instructiOl1Sfor submitting comments. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods: DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45 of systems, which could reduce controllability of the airplane. that applies to certain Model 757 airplanes. The existing AD currently requires inspecti certain power feeder wire bundles for damage, inspecting the·support clamps for these wire bundles [0determine whether the cl~ps are properly installed, and performing corrective actions ifnecessary. This proposed AD would require additional inspections forcertai.n airplanes. This proposed AD results from a report that apower feeder wire bundle chafed against the number SL"X auxiliary slat track. causing electrical wires in the bundle to arc, which damaged both the auxiliary slat track and power feeder wires. We ff 0' (<7 are proposing this AD 10prevent arcing thal could be apossible ignition source for >fG$Y"""," 

# Lf leaked flammable fluids, which could result in a fire. Arcing could also result in a loss 0 "m~

# M-\I 

# , power from the generator connected to the power fceder wire bundle, and consequem 10 ,
DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

• Federal eRulemaklng Portal: Go to hnp:II\'o'WW.regulations.!!ov. FoJlow the!"~II)-l~-I·I DEI'r\RTMENT Of'TRANSPOIn':\TION

,.•CFR Pan J'J ID<x~el :"'0. F.\,-\';!:UIO--o+-~..-; llin:ctor:ue Iderllil'kr 2009·NM-12'J-.\DI RIN .! I:W-.~:\.ft4 

### i\"lI~ 

### -fl~ 

# ~·'W"r1 .'": 

# -- 9. ! 10

r\cnON: ;-<I'll(:<'

## orjHopl)s~d mk-m:\klll,g

(NPRM). .\Ct:NCY: h'J"r;.d .~"ml!on :\<!mmiSlr"U('1l iF!\:"-). Dcpl.tnmClll QrTrJllsponali"n ~DOTI 

## sf,(1 fj'l-:<'i ~U' Ii\lAR Y: Th..:I:AA propo;cs 10) su!X'rscrli' :m e:astins ;llrW('rrl.hU1~ ,hn:clll ~ {Ai) '''''~i' ~el:"" 

### "". lhal Jl>Pil..:" Ii} CC1111111Mudd 757 :Jirplan..:s Thl" eXI~ting AU currently r"'quire.!. m:>11<;l:ll1 <:l'';: ~" ••'

0·, TE5: \..-c 111U$1rc(:ch-e comments un thl$ proposed .. \0 l>~jlt-.SERT 

## D." Ti~ .:\5 IV, YS .,\FTER DATE Of PUBLICA TlON !~TI IE FEDERAJ_ REGiSTER] -" -_ ... +

• F~-ucral,:Rukmak-ing Po"al: Go to tufp;!tW\\'\\ ,rc!;ulalinl\s-JlO\. Foll!,)wth•.. 

## -~-- 

# .•..
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMPS solidification model.  Analysis and calculation of macrosegregation in a casting ingotWork performed on several existing solidification models for which computer codes and documentation were developed is presented. The models describe the solidification of alloys in which there is a time varying zone of coexisting solid and liquid phases; i.e., the S/L zone. The primary purpose of the models is to calculate macrosegregation in a casting or ingot which results from flow of interdendritic liquid in this S/L zone during solidification. The flow, driven by solidification contractions and by gravity acting on density gradients in the interdendritic liquid, is modeled as flow through a porous medium. In Model 1, the steady state model, the heat flow characteristics are those of steady state solidification; i.e., the S/L zone is of constant width and it moves at a constant velocity relative to the mold. In Model 2, the unsteady state model, the width and rate of movement of the S/L zone are allowed to vary with time as it moves through the ingot. Each of these models exists in two versions. Models 1 and 2 are applicable to binary alloys; models 1M and 2M are applicable to multicomponent alloys.Document ID19850023865Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsPoirier, D. R.*(Arizona Univ. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Maples, A. L.*(General Electric Co.)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1985Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberDOC-85HV002NASA-CR-171589NAS 1.26:171589Accession Number85N32178Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-36039Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850023865.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### SALSUL COMPANY v. KOHLMEYER & CO., in Liquidation.

No. 61755.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1978.

In re: Salsul Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 354 So.2d 711.

Writ granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is reversed. Court of appeal erred in not finding that trial judge erred in failing to permit the amendment including Raymond F. Salmen and/or Succession of Raymond F. Salmen as party plaintiff. La. Code Civ.P. art. 934. Case remanded to trial court for further proceedings according to law and consistent with views herein expressed.

SUMMERS, J.,

concurs. While I agree that Salmen’s Succession should be made a party on the basis of this application, I must persist in my position that deciding the merits of such a question in chambers without a hearing by which the adverse parties can be heard, involves the denial of due process.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AK-962-1410-00-P; AA-9287]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of Section 14(h)(1) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 
Act of December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(h)(1), will be issued to 
Calista Corporation for approximately 0.8 acres. The lands involved are 
in the vicinity of Nunivak Island, Alaska.

Seward Meridian, Alaska

T. 3 S., R. 102 W.,
    Sec. 25.

    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the Anchorage Daily News. Copies of the 
decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599 ((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until October 16, 1997 to file an appeal. 
However, parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days 
from the date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in 
the Bureau of Land Management at the address identified above, where 
the requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do 
not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR part 
4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Patricia A. Baker,
Land Law Examiner, ANCSA Team, Branch of 962 Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 97-24516 Filed 9-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
1

Mears, Gilbert

From: benita campbell <b_j_campbell@yahoo.com>

Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 12:57 PM

To: Mears, Gilbert

Subject: Docket #: EPA-HQ-TRI-2013-0281

Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

Please close the TRI evasion gimmick that favors oil and gas industry. It procured that 

special favor with money and influence that allows them to avoid 

reasonable responsibilities and accountability that would make the marketplace much 

fairer and would certainly boost the health and well-being of humans and other 

species. 

We all deserve to know exactly what fossil fuel extractors are releasing into our air, 

water, and land. We cannot have true freedom without the right to know what the 

favored oligarchs are doing to us. 

The ability of my community to thrive depends on this knowledge.
#### Ex Parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL.

77-704.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 18, 1978.

ALMON, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48261-48262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24294]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Logistics Agency


Privacy Act of 1974; Notice to Amend Records Systems

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DOD.

[[Page 48262]]

ACTION: Notice to amend records systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency proposes to amend all systems of 
records notices in its inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The amendment consists 
of changing the entry under the Contesting record procedures category 
to a uniform statement.
    The entry will now read as `The DLA rules for accessing records, 
for contesting contents and appealing initial agency determinations are 
contained in DLA Regulation 5400.21, 32 CFR part 323, or may be 
obtained from the Privacy Act Officer, Headquarters, Defense Logistics 
Agency, ATTN: CAAR, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2533, Fort 
Belvoir, VA 22060-6221.'
DATES: The amendment will be effective on September 15, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Privacy Act Officer, Headquarters, 
Defense Logistics Agency, ATTN: CAAR, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 
2533, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Susan Salus at (703) 767-6183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency notices for 
systems of records subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), 
as amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are 
available from the address above.
    The specific change to the record systems being amended are set 
forth below. The proposed amendments are not within the purview of 
subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, 
which requires the submission of a new or altered systems report.
    The amendment consists of changing the entry under the Contesting 
record procedures category to a uniform statement. The entry will now 
read as `The DLA rules for accessing records, for contesting contents 
and appealing initial agency determinations are contained in DLA 
Regulation 5400.21, 32 CFR part 323, or may be obtained from the 
Privacy Act Officer, Headquarters, Defense Logistics Agency, ATTN: 
CAAR, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 2533, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-
6221.'
    Dated: September 9, 1997.

L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-24294 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-F
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.11


                                 ACKNOWLEDGMENT

         I acknowledge that my employment with HighwayMaster Corporation ended
effective on December 1, 1998, as a "Termination by Employee" under Section 7(b)
of my amended Employment Agreement, and I have resigned from the boards of
directors of HighwayMaster Corporation and HighwayMaster Communications, Inc.
effective December 1, 1998.  I acknowledge that I have received payment in full
for HighwayMaster Corporation's obligations under my Employment Agreement dated
February 4, 1994, as amended, except for (a) ongoing duties of HighwayMaster to
indemnify or insure me as set forth in Section 21 of my Employment Agreement,
(b) benefits under employee benefit plans to the extent the terms of any
applicable employee benefit plans expressly provide for the continuation of
benefits after termination of employment, (c) benefits required by law,
including the offering of COBRA benefits at rates provided by law, (d)
reasonable expense reimbursements pursuant to Section 4 of the Employment
Agreement that are incurred before December 1, 1998 and requested before
December 31, 1998, and (e) $300,000 minus normal payroll withholding, which
HighwayMaster agrees to pay me on January 1, 1999. 

         I understand that due to my resignation effective December 1, 1998,
100,000 of my stock options in HighwayMaster Communications, Inc. that were
priced at $1.19 per share do not vest, and have expired.  I understand that the
remaining 393,478 of my stock options, priced at $7.58 per share, will expire 60
days after December 1, 1998. 

Executed as of December 15, 1998.

 /s/ WILLIAM C. SAUNDERS   
-----------------------------------
William C. Saunders
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GSI
Group Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael E. Katzenstein, Principal Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



/s/ Michael E. KatzensteinMichael E. KatzensteinPrincipal Executive Officer


December 13, 2010

This Certification shall
not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, or incorporated by reference into any of the Companys filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filings to the Report.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GSI Group Inc. and will be retained by GSI Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.