alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2012March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brad Hacker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Registrant



Date: May 15, 2012

Sierra Resource Group, Inc.



By: /s/ Brad HackerBrad HackerChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000943906
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND V, L.P., SERIES 4
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           1,725,133
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,725,133
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,980,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,306,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,980,794
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   114,485
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      169,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,146,270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,201,158)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,201,158)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,201,158)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (54.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1746 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent interference with Federal 

disaster relief efforts, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2005 

Mr. VITTER (for himself and Mr. KYL) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent interference with Federal disaster relief efforts, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Relief Per5 sonnel Protection Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CREATING FEDERAL CRIME OF INTERFERING WITH 

7 FEDERAL DISASTER RELIEF EFFORTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 65 of title 18, United 

9 States Code, is amended by adding the following new sec10 tion: 
2 

•S 1746 IS

1 ‘‘§ 1370. Interference with Federal disaster relief ef2 forts 

3 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITED CONDUCT.—Whoever, during a 

4 presidentially-declared major disaster or emergency— 

5 ‘‘(1) forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, 

6 intimidates, or interferes with any officer or em7 ployee of the United States or of any agency in any 

8 branch of the United States Government (including 

9 any member of the uniformed services) while such 

10 officer or employee is engaged in or on account of 

11 the performance of official duties relating to, or in 

12 support of recovery from, the presidentially-declared 

13 disaster or emergency, or any person assisting such 

14 an officer or employee in the performance of such 

15 duties or on account of that assistance; or 

16 ‘‘(2) forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, 

17 intimidates, or interferes with any person providing 

18 services in support of disaster relief efforts and 

19 working in coordination with a Federal coordinating 

20 officer appointed pursuant to section 302, Public 

21 Law 98–288 (42 U.S.C. 5143), 

22 shall, except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, 

23 be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two 

24 years, or both. 

25 ‘‘(b) ENHANCED PENALTY.—Whoever, in the com26 mission of and in relation to any act described in sub-
3 

•S 1746 IS

1 section (a) of this section, carries, possesses or uses a 

2 deadly or dangerous weapon or inflicts serious bodily in3 jury, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more 

4 than 15 years or both, or, if the death of any person re5 sults, shall be punished by death or life imprisonment.’’. 

6 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

7 at the beginning of chapter 86 of title 18, United States 

8 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

9 item: 

‘‘1370. Interference with Federal disaster relief efforts.’’. 

Æ
Weather and Climate Considerations: Dairy

AGRICULTURAL AND NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION

Hertzler cows grazing in springtime. Image by Kathy Soder, ARS.

How does the changing climate 

impact dairy operations, and what 

can dairy farmers do to adapt? 

Brown Swiss cows at Shelburne Farms. 

Elements of dairy that are changing 

Increased heat stress in dairy livestock can reduce feedintake, milk production, and livestock fertility. For a Southern 

Pennsylvania farm, average annual losses in milk production from excess heat1

 were projected to be 1% to 2% by 

mid-century, and as much as 7% by 2100. Increasing the 

cooling capacity of existing barns, and using modeled 

temperature projections when planning new structures 

can avoid losses.

Risk of soil erosion, compaction, and nutrient loss wil 

increase. Increased rainfall amounts and storm intensities 

could increase field nutrient losses as much as 40% by 

mid-century2

 and 87% by 2100. The use of winter cover 

crops and double crops can maintain ground cover for 

most of the year, which can increase crop uptake, and 

reduce leaching and surface run-off. Routing water away 

from manure containment structures will remain important.

Pasture production will likely change. Summer production 

might decrease due to more heat and drought stress, while 

cool season winter pasture production may see increases 

due to warmer and wetter winters. In the Northeast, opportunities to extend the grazing season will increase.

Control of weeds, invasives, and pests may become more 

challenging. Warmer winters will likely allow more southern 

weeds and pests to survive and thrive.

Changes in our climate

Average temperatures are going up. 

Temperatures could increase 3 – 6 °F 

by mid-century (2041-2070). 

More days with temperatures > 95 °F 

increase animal heat stress.

More rainfall, especially in winter and 

spring. 

More heavy downpours are increasing 

runoff and flooding.

The growing season is getting longer.

Climate projections from the 2014 National Climate Assessment 

1. Rotz CA, et al. (2016) Farm simulation can help dairy production systems adapt to climate change. In: Hatfield J, Fleisher D (eds) Advances 

in Agricultural Modeling, Vol. 7.

2. Rotz CA, et al. (2016) Evaluating greenhouse gas mitigation and 

climate change adaptation in dairy production using farm simulation. 

Trans ASA

March 2018

www.climatehubs.oce.usda.gov/northeast

nehub@fs.fed.us

@usdaclimatehubs

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Rodney BLACKWELL and Catherine Dodds.

Nos. 61119, 61119-A.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1978.

A. J. Boudreaux, Staff Appeals Counsel, Indigent Defender Board, 24th Judicial District, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John M. Mam-oulides, Dist. Atty., Abbott J. Reeves, Director, Research and Appeals Division, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0339 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-SW-051-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the periodic report of SKYSTAR BIO-PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Weibing Lu, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date: August 22, 2011
/s/ Weibing LuWeibing LuChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  filing  of  Virilitec  Industries,  Inc.,  a  Delaware

corporation  (the  "Company"),  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  April 30,

2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  the

undersigned,  Moshe  Laufer,  the  Treasurer of the Company,  hereby  certifies,

pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C.ss.1350),

that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material

respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 20, 2003



/s/ Moshe Laufer

-----------------------

Moshe Laufer, Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 47762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24007]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-60; RM-8982]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Waynesboro and Collinwood, TN

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Ohio Broadcast Associates, 
reallots Channel 235C3 from Waynesboro to Collinwood, Tennessee, and 
modifies Station WFRQ-FM's license to specify Collinwood as its 
community of license. See 62 FR 07984, February 21, 1997. Channel 235C3 
can be allotted to Collinwood in compliance with the Commission's 
minimum distance separation requirements at the site specified in 
Station WFRQ-FM's license. The coordinates for Channel 235C3 at 
Collinwood are 35-08-16 NL and 87-49-43 WL. With this action, this 
proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 20, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 97-60, adopted August 27, 1997, and 
released September 5, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, DC. 
The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th 
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Tennessee, 
is amended by removing Channel 235C3 at Waynesboro and adding 
Collinwood, Channel 235C3.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-24007 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Sample...HeatedFilterBoxtoProbeII1-1HeatedUmbillicalI'•HeatedPressureRegulation1•LaminarFlowElementl__________ECOCHEMII-_____,___l__________lSTACKIIICALIBRATIONMANIFOLDCalibrationGasesFIGURE5.ECOCHEMCEMS(HCI)SAMPLEBUILDINGOuttoStack109/231051LILFIG51020305
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.30


Schedule to Senior Vice President Severance Agreement


The following is a list of our executive officers who are party to the Company’s Senior Vice President Severance Agreement, the form of which was filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended 9.28.2013:


Jay Stein
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in theevent that publications are no longer available from the original publishingagency site. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  Licensee newsletter

 
SuDoc: Y 3.N 88:57/
Item Number:: 1052-B (online)
CGP system Number: 000791328
 
2006| 

2007| May2007 | July2007 | Fall2007 | Winter2007

2008| Spring2008 | Summer2008 | Fall2008 | Winter2008

2009| Spring2009 | Summer2009 | Fall2009 | Winter2009

2010| Spring2010 | Summer2010 | Fall2010 | Winter2010

2011| Spring2011 | Summer2011 | Fall2011

2012| Spring2012 | Summer2012|
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48269-48270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. OA97-237-000, ER97-1079-000 and EC97-35-000]


New England Power Pool; Notice of Filing

September 9, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 31, 1997, New England Power Pool tendered 
for filing an amendment in the above-referenced dockets.Any person 
desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or protests must be filed 
on or before September 19, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to

[[Page 48270]]

intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24362 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMicrogravity silicon zoning investigationThe flow instabilities in floating zones of silicon were investigated and methods for investigation of these instabilities in microgravity were defined. Three principal tasks were involved: (1) characterization of the float zone in small diameter rods; (2) investigation of melt flow instabilities in circular melts in silicon disks; and (3) the development of a prototype of an apparatus that could be used in near term space experiments to investigate flow instabilities in a molten zone. It is shown that in a resistance heated zoner with 4 to 7 mm diameter silicon rods that the critical Marangoni number is about 1480 compared to a predicted value of 14 indicative that viable space experiments might be performed. The prototype float zone apparatus is built and specifications are prepared for a flight zoner should a decision be reached to proceed with a space flight experimental investigation.Document ID19850022760Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsKern, E. L.*(Westech Systems, Inc. Phoenix, AZ, United States)*Gill, G. L., Jr.*(Westech Systems, Inc. Phoenix, AZ, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 15, 1985Subject CategoryAstronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA-CR-171531NAS 1.26:171531Accession Number85N31073Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-34920Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850022760.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Beatrice G. BROWNING, as the City Clerk of the City of Plantation, Appellant, v. Dennis J. WALTON, Appellee.

No. 76-1241.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 1, 1977.

Donald J. Lunny, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Frank E. Hamilton, III of Hamilton, Douglas & Bennett, P. A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

FRANK N. KANEY, Associate Judge.

This case is factually similar to the Second District Court of Appeal’s case of *Warden v. Bennett,*340 So.2d 977 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976), and our own case of *Clark v. Walton,*351 So.2d 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

Appellant is the Clerk of the City of Plantation who has control of the city’s personnel files. Appellee is a union organizer who wants the names and home addresses of the city’s employees. He obtained a Writ of Mandamus when Appellant refused to provide him with them even though he had offered to pay any costs incurred.

The city had distributed to its employees a form requesting the city to maintain the confidentiality of all material in their personnel files. The addresses of all those who signed the form were not provided to Ap-pellee.

*381Appellant cited *Wisher v. News-Press Publishing Co.,*310 So.2d 345 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), in which the Second District Court of Appeal said personnel records were confidential. That decision was reversed by our Supreme Court at 345 So.2d 646. While not allowing the news media in that case an unrestricted fishing expedition into all the county personnel files, the Supreme Court did direct the county administrator to provide the information sought from the files.

The Appellant seeks to have this court judicially engraft the “self-imposed” exemption to the Public Records Act, Section 119.07(2), Florida Statutes (1975).

This we cannot do. The purpose of this Statute was to open the records so the citizens could discover what their government was doing. If we were to allow such exemption before long the imposition of that exemption might well become a condition of employment. This would plainly thwart the purpose of the Statute. A trash collector with knowledge of wrongdoing in the Trash Department is more likely to reveal what he knows to an investigator in the privacy of his own Florida room than he is under the watchful eye of his foreman at the Trash Department offices.

We have considered the other contentions of the Appellant and find them to be unpersuasive.

The Final Judgment is AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.