alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 31, 2017

d0522

Order 

Clerk

May 31, 2017

153759

ANGELA M. ROBINSON, a Legally Incapacitated

Person, and REMO MARZELLA and MARIE

MARZELLA, a/k/a TONI MARZELLA, Co- Guardians/Co-Conservators/Co-Trustees,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 153759

COA: 325080

Oakland CC: 2014-138598-NM

MUNGER & ASSOCIATES, PLLC, MUNGER &

ASSOCIATES, PC, JON B. MUNGER,

JENNIFER CARNEY, and CHRISTINE A. WAID,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 7, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Mary Ann Ellis McKAY v. Eugene Claris McKAY.

No. 49646.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 5, 1977.

Hurlbert & O’Barr, Clyde Hurlbert, Biloxi, for appellant.

Sekul, Hornsby & Wallace, Thomas L. Wallace, Biloxi, for appellee.

Before INZER, P. J., ROBERTSON and BOWLING, JJ., and JAMES E. BOST, C.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, John D. Doherty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Central Bancorp, Inc.,certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Central Bancorp, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.          August14, 2006 /s/ John D. Doherty         John D. Doherty    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
254 La. 1096

#### STATE of Louisiana v. John Louis ELIE, William Edward Scott and Clifton Styles.

No. 50237.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 18, 1969.

ORDER

Considering application of relators, together with the response of the district attorney thereto, wherein he urges that this court grant the writ since a decision in the case affects one hundred others similarly situated, and “it is to the best interest of both the State and the defendants and to the ends of justice,” that the issue involved be immediately resolved.

It is ordered that the Honorable Guy E. Humphries, Jr., Judge of the Ninth Judicial District, be, and he is hereby ordered, to appoint a judge from an adjoining judicial district to try the motion to recuse him or show cause to the contrary in this court on or before 11:00 a. m., Tuesday, January 20, 1970.
<PAGE>

32.1  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      of Ravenwood Bourne, Ltd. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley
      Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of RAVENWOOD BOURNE (the
"Company") for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Michael
Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ravenwood
Bourne, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: September 10, 2009

                                      /s/ Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Financial Officer
Case 4:06-cv-01132-JEJ-JVW Document 2 Filed 06/12/06 Page 1 of 6
Case 4:06-cv-01132-JEJ-JVW Document 2 Filed 06/12/06 Page 2 of 6
Case 4:06-cv-01132-JEJ-JVW Document 2 Filed 06/12/06 Page 3 of 6
Case 4:06-cv-01132-JEJ-JVW Document 2 Filed 06/12/06 Page 4 of 6
Case 4:06-cv-01132-JEJ-JVW Document 2 Filed 06/12/06 Page 5 of 6
Case 4:06-cv-01132-JEJ-JVW Document 2 Filed 06/12/06 Page 6 of 6
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEnergy balance and the composition of weight loss during prolonged space flightIntegrated metabolic balance analysis, Skylab integrated metabolic balance analysis and computer simulation of fluid-electrolyte responses to zero-g, overall mission weight and tissue losses, energy balance, diet and exercise, continuous changes, electrolyte losses, caloric and exercise requirements, and body composition are discussed.Document ID19840009752Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLeonard, J. I.*(Management and Technical Services Co. Houston, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateOctober 20, 1982Subject CategoryAerospace MedicineReport/Patent NumberTIR-2114-MED-2012NAS 1.26:171745NASA-CR-171745Accession Number84N17820Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-16328CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-12932CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-15487CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-14523Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840009752.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23800]



[[Page 47474]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-495-000]


ANR Storage Company; Notice of Proposed Changes In FERC Gas 
Tariff

September 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, ANR Storage Company (ANR 
Storage) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1 and Original Volume No. 2, tariff sheets listed on 
Appendix A to the filing, to be effective September 1, 1997.
    ANR Storage states that this filing is being made to implement 
changes to its Volume 1 and Volume 2 tariff to conform with the 
revisions made to Part 154 of the Commission's regulations pursuant to 
Order Nos. 582 and 582-A. ANR has requested a waiver of the thirty (30) 
day notice period to allow the tariff sheet to become effective on 
September 1, 1997.
    ANR Storage states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
company's jurisdictional customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23800 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1989

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 57 Rolfe Square in Cranston, Rhode Island,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Holly A. Charette

Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1989 ES

1 SECTION 1. HOLLY A. CHARETTE POST OFFICE.

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

3 Postal Service located at 57 Rolfe Square in Cranston,

4 Rhode Island, shall be known and designated as the

5 ‘‘Holly A. Charette Post Office’’.

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Holly A. Charette

10 Post Office’’.

Passed the Senate November 18, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1989

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postignated as the ‘‘Holly A. Charette Post Office’’. ston, Rhode Island, shall be known and des- al Service located at 57 Rolfe Square in Cran-
No. 00-7248.

#### Valencia-Burgos *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### James GETTY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1096.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 1, 1978.

*323Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender and Elliot Gersten, Legal Intern, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The single issue presented upon this appeal is whether the trial judge erroneously denied defendant’s motion to suppress the physical evidence. There were three searches: (1) of defendant’s automobile at the time of his arrest, (2) of defendant’s automobile at the police garage pursuant to a search warrant, and (3) of defendant’s residence pursuant to a search warrant. Defendant attacks the validity of the search warrants upon the ground that the affidavits do not show probable cause. We hold that in each case, the affidavit contains sufficient facts to show probable cause. See the principles of law in *Brenner v. State,*337 So.2d 1007, 1008-1009 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Defendant does not question the legality of his arrest. The initial warrantless search at the time of his arrest, when contraband was seen but not removed, was a legal search pursuant to defendant’s arrest and was necessary for an inventory incident to the impoundment of defendant’s automobile. See *Waterhouse v. State,*256 So.2d 397 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); and *Gagnon v. State,*212 So.2d 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968).

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-31147

Conference Calendar

 

ISSAC I. OMOIKE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CV-894

- - - - - - - - - -

December 11, 1996

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Issac I. Omoike does not challenge the district court’s

order granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and

dismissing his complaint based on the doctrine of res judicata. 

Omoike merely challenges the district court’s rulings made in his

earlier suit which made the same claims as those made in the

instant complaint.
No. 95-31147

- 2 -

Because Omoike has not disputed the district court’s

determinations that the instant suit is identical to Omoike’s

complaint in civil action # 91-6530B-M1, that he sued the same

defendant in both suits, and that the prior action was dismissed

on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction, the complaint

was properly dismissed based on the doctrine of res judicata. 

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); Nilsen v. City of Moss Point, Miss.,

701 F.2d 556, 559 (5th Cir. 1983) (en banc). The rulings in the

prior action became final when Omoike failed to file a timely

notice of appeal from the dismissal of that action, and Omoike

cannot contest such rulings in the present action.

Omoike argued for the first time in his notice of appeal

that the district judge and magistrate judge are biased against

him. Therefore, this issue is subject to plain error review. 

See United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir.

1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995). Omoike’s

allegations of judicial bias involve questions of fact which, by

their nature, are not obvious error. See Robertson v. Plano City

of Texas, 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1995). The bias issue is not

subject to appellate review. 

Because Omoike has failed to raise an issue of arguable

merit, the appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. Rule 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
**Exhibit 21.1**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

**BWAY HOLDING COMPANY (Delaware corporation)**

Subsidiaries of BWAY Holding Company (each is wholly-owned) 

BWAYCorporation. (Delaware corporation) 

**BWAY CORPORATION (Delaware corporation)**

Subsidiaries of BWAY Corporation (each is wholly-owned) 

Armstrong Containers, Inc. (Delaware corporation)

North America Packaging Corporation (Delaware corporation) 

Subsidiaries of North America Packaging Corporation (each is wholly-owned) 

North America Packaging of Puerto Rico, Inc. (Delawarecorporation) 

SC Plastics, LLC (Georgia limited liability company) 

Subsidiaries of Armstrong Containers, Inc. (each is wholly-owned) 

ICL Industrial Containers, ULC (Nova Scotia unlimited liability company)
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

15 U.S.C. SECTION 7241

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Walter G. Goodrich, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2015



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Walter G. Goodrich 
|Walter G. Goodrich     
|Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-18445, 333-43087 and 333-58372) and Form S-8
(Nos. 333-16981, 333-16303, 333-15159, 333-06405, 333-27301, 333-71473,
333-53365, 333-44413, 333-85541, 333-86011, 333-44970, 333-35038, 333-68986,
033-93180, 033-99860, 333-65305 and 333-58496) of Avant! Corporation of our
report dated February 6, 2002 relating to the financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Avant! Corporation, which appears in this Form 10-K. We
also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-18445, 333-43087 and 333-58372) and Form S-8
(Nos. 333-16981, 333-16303, 333-15159, 333-06405, 333-27301, 333-71473,
333-53365, 333-44413, 333-85541, 333-86011, 333-44970, 333-35038, 333-68986,
033-93180, 033-99860, 333-65305 and 333-58496) of Avant! Corporation of our
report dated January 18, 2002 relating to the financial statements of Forefront
Venture Partners L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, which appears in this
Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
March 29, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         153,204
<SECURITIES>                                    12,150
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,008
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,462
<PP&E>                                         207,255
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,718
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 462,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,241
<BONDS>                                        125,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            97
<OTHER-SE>                                     152,825
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   462,186
<SALES>                                         26,223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,223
<CGS>                                           23,509
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,647
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,040)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (41,973)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (41,973)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,973)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)


</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:SmartWay excellence award : EPA criteria.**
 
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018| 2019
2020 | 2021
 
SuDoc Number:EP 6.52:SM 2/5/
Item Number:0484-E (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001066698
 
August 9, 2018
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending  September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Paul W. Andre,  Treasurer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 13, 2009



                                            By: /s/ PAUL W. ANDRE
                                                ___________________________
                                                    Paul W. Andre
                                                    Treasurer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer