alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31
 
 
 
 Page - 8 
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
 I, Frank C. Mashburn , certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB of Gaofeng Gold, Corp. ;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 c) presented in this Quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
 
 6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this Quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Dated: June 15, 2004
 /s/Frank C, Mashburn
 Frank C. Mashburn
 President/ director
 
 Page - 9
#### Leona SANDERS, as Administratrix of the Estate of her Minor Son Darryl Sanders v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES et al.

No. 61779.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1978.

In re: Leona Sanders applying for Cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 354 So.2d 663.

Writ denied.
EXHIBIT 13



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Progen Pharmaceuticals Limited, a company organized under the laws of the State of Queensland, Australia (the “Company”), does hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2015 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Progen Pharmaceuticals Limited and will be retained by Progen Pharmaceuticals Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







|Dated: October 27, 2015 |  | /s/ Indrajit Arulampalam
Executive Chairman   
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|                        |  |                                               
|                        |  |                                               
|                        |  |                                               
|Dated: October 27, 2015 |  | /s/ Generosa Hipona
Group Financial Accountant
|                        |  |
CONFIRMATION



TO:      MICHAEL GREEN

         This is to confirm the renewal of the employment agreement made as of
October 1, 2000, for a further one year period commencing on October 1, 2001,
and ending on September 30, 2002, under the same terms and conditions,
including, the terms relating to compensation.

         Dated at Markham this 1st day of October, 2001.



         MIAD SYSTEMS LTD.


         Per:
         -------------------------------------------------
         Michael Green - President
2/4/2015

HARGROVE, MARCUS WAYK(e

The Court has dismissed your application'for writ.of habeas corpus without written

order; the sentence has been discharged:..'Sec ExparteHarrington, 310 S.W.3d

452 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).

H3B

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

OFFICIAL BUSINESS., ;,x. <:

state ©ftexas.v^jifir

PENALTY FOR

PRIVATE USE

•'it

T>.ttCt. Na

02 1R

0002003152 FEB09 2015 /

W&7&VW&FR0M zWWFi imiz

Abel Acosta, Clerk

MARCUS WAYNE HARGROVE _ , _ . .,. _

TDC#1928lT2tl

'1\
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001076700
<NAME>                        VIRILITEC INDUSTRIES, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-2001
<CASH>                                         31,261
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               44,619
<PP&E>                                         3,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 52,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,700
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       474
<OTHER-SE>                                     50,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   52,444
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,320
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,122
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,122
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,122
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.001



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-50104

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FELIPE ALBERTO MARTINEZ-ALMEIDA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-00-CR-1289-ALL-DB

--------------------

July 23, 2001

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Louis Elias Lopez, the attorney appointed to represent

Felipe Alberto Martinez-Almeida (Martinez), has requested leave

to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Martinez did not file

a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
No. 01-50104

-2-

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2
Jeremiah W Oay) Nixon, Governor • Sara Parker Pauley, Director 

T OF NATURAL RESOURCES 


www.dn r. mo.gov 

SEP 7 2016 

Mr. Mark Hague 


Regional Administrator 


U.S. EPA, Region VII 


11201 Renner Boulevard 


Lenexa, KS 6621 9 


Dear Mr. Hague: 

This letter is to clarify what rule language my July 14, 2016 supplemental state implementation 


plan (SIP) submittal letter is requesting to withdraw. 


Regarding the August 8, 2011, SIP submittal, I am requesting to withdraw the phrase "including 

the revision published at 75 FR 31606-07 (effective August 2, 2010)" in rule 1 0 CSR 10-6.060, 

subsection (8)(A), so that subsection (8)(A) will read " .... promulgated as of July 1, 2009, are 

hereby incorporated ....". I am also requesting to withdraw the words "Except that:" in 

paragraph (2)(A)2. and withdraw subparagraphs (2)(A)2.A. and (2)(A)2.B. in rule 10 CSR 10­

6.065. 

Regarding the August 31, 2012, SIP submittal, I am requesting to withdraw the sentence in 

subparagraph (2)(A)2.B. beginning with "For the purposes of this rule, prior to July 21, 2014, ... 

. ". (Note that entire subparagraph is being withdrawn/rom the August 8, 2011, SIP submittal) 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have any questions regarding this 

supplemental submittal information, please contact me at the department's Air Pollution Control 

Program, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, or by phone at (573) 751-4817. 

Sincerely, 

AI/LUTION CONTROL PROGRAM 

~M~r7c/;?~ Director 

KLM:wgc 

o R,c~ c1ed Pllper
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2188 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2188

         To suspend temporarily the duty on hydrazine hydrate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 2006

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on hydrazine hydrate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HYDRAZINE HYDRATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.28.25      Hydrazine hydrate   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 7803-57-                                                  31/2008
                         8) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2825.10).........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESUS BARRERA OSORIO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-73027

Agency No. A095-875-471

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 18, 2014** 

Before: ALARCÓN, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Jesus Barrera Osorio, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings

conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

FILED

FEB 24 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, and we review de novo

questions of law. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005).

We deny the petition for review.

The IJ did not abuse her discretion in denying Barrera Osorio’s motion to

reopen where Barrera Osorio failed to establish that exceptional circumstances

excused his failure to appear at his hearing. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(1) (defining

exceptional circumstances as circumstances beyond the control of the alien). 

Barrera Osorio’s contention that the IJ did not consider the totality of

circumstances is not supported by the record.

The BIA did not err in summarily affirming Barrera Osorio’s appeal where

the factors he presented for his failure to appear did not present a novel factual or

legal scenario. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(e)(4)(i)(B) (setting forth situations which are

appropriate for affirmance without opinion); cf. Chen v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 1081,

1086-87 (9th Cir. 2004) (remanding to the BIA for consideration of a novel and

substantial legal issue in the first instance).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 12-73027
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2674 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2674

 To amend the Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions 
 Act of 1994 to increase transparency and accountability regarding the 
  operations of the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2023

   Mr. Daines (for himself, Mr. Warner, Mr. Crapo, and Mr. Warnock) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions 
 Act of 1994 to increase transparency and accountability regarding the 
  operations of the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CDFI Fund Transparency Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO TESTIFY.

    Section 104(b) of the Community Development Banking and Financial 
Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4703(b)) is amended by adding to 
the end the following:
            ``(5) Annual testimony.--The Secretary of the Treasury (or 
        a designee of the Secretary) shall, at the discretion of the 
        chairman of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
        Affairs of the Senate and chairman of the Committee on 
        Financial Services of the House of Representatives, annually 
        testify before such committees (or a subcommittee of such 
        committees) regarding the operations of the Fund during the 
        previous fiscal year.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Tullys Coffee Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended March
28, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 13, 2005 (the Report), I, Kristopher S. Galvin, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ KRISTOPHER S. GALVIN                                                                                               
|Kristopher S. Galvin Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting officer)
April 13, 2005
#### Charles BIRD, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL GRAPHICS, INC., Appellee.

No. 77-2569.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 25, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 15, 1978.

R. Stuart Huff and John F. Lisk, Miami, for appellant.

Friedman & Britton and Paul G. Hyman, Jr., Miami, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

The question presented by this appeal is whether the attempted substituted service of the plaintiff/appellee upon the defendant/appellant, pursuant to Section 48.181, Florida Statutes (1977), was sufficient to secure jurisdiction of the defendant. We hold that the service was not sufficient and reverse the judgment.

The plaintiff, International Graphics, Inc., sued the defendant for the balance due on an open account. Summons was issued for the individual defendant, Charles Bird, at an address in Dade County, Florida. The summons was returned unexecuted with the notation, “moved per manager.” Alias summons was issued for service at a different address in Dade County. The return on the alias summons showed no service, with a notation, “no longer at this address as per Lianes Sound Studio.” Pluries summons was issued and returned unexecuted by an individual who is not shown to have been appointed by the court. Another summons was issued with directions to serve the Secretary of State as the defendant’s statutory resident agent, pursuant to Sections 48.181 and 48.161, Florida Statutes (1977). The Secretary of State accepted service. A motion for default was filed and although no default was entered, a final judgment was entered against the defendant. Within ten days, the defendant moved to vacate the judgment upon the ground that he had not been served with process. Defendant’s motion was denied and this appeal is from that order.

Appellant urges that no ground for substituted service under the statute appears *317in the record. Appellee urges that the issuance of three summonses, all of which were returned unserved, is sufficient to show that defendant was concealing his whereabouts as set forth as a basis for substituted service in Section 48.181, Florida Statutes (1977).

One seeking to effect substituted service of process has the burden of presenting facts which clearly justify the applicability of the statute. *AB CTC v. Morejon,*324 So.2d 625 (Fla.1975). The failure of the sheriff and a process service to locate the defendant at three addresses furnished by the plaintiff is not enough to establish concealment. The record does not show by affidavit or otherwise that sufficient search and inquiry was actually made to ascertain that the defendant was concealing his whereabouts. Cf. *Fleischman*v. *Morris,*260 So.2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972).

Therefore, the order denying defendant’s motion to vacate the final judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Frederick L. Bowman, President and Principal Accounting Officer of Portland
Brewing Company, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Portland Brewing
Company.



                                             /s/ FREDERICK L. BOWMAN
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Frederick L. Bowman, President and
                                             Principal Accounting Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Portland Brewing Company and will be retained by Portland Brewing
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
ALASKAN SEAFOOD

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2013-0652

DCN:_ 00449CBI

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)   In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Empyrean Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert L. Lee,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Robert L.
Lee_ Robert L. Lee,
President and CEO   Dated:
 December 2, 2009