alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1


                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors
SITEL Corporation:

We consent to the use of our reports incorporated by reference in the
registration Statement (No.333-13403) filed on Form S-3, Registration Statement
(No. 033-99434) filed on Form S-8, Registration Statement (No. 333-19069) filed
on Form S-8, Registration Statement (No. 333-30635) filed on Form S-8,
Registration Statement (No. 333-28131) filed on Form S-3, Registration Statement
(No. 333-44781) filed on Form S-8 of SITEL Corporation of our reports dated
February 17, except note 15 which is as of March 10, 1998, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of SITEL Corporation and subsidiaries as of December
31, 1996 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss),
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1997 and the related schedule, which reports appear in
the December 31, 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K of SITEL Corporation.


                                                           KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Omaha, Nebraska
March 24, 1998
<PAGE>
                        Extension to Employment Agreement

         This Agreement entered into on the 17th day of October, 2003 by and
between The Med-Design Corporation a publicly traded Delaware Corporation and
David Dowsett an individual.

         WHEREAS, David Dowsett and The Med-Design Corporation have previously
entered into an Employment Agreement dated May 15, 2002 whereby David Dowsett
was employed by The Med-Design Corporation as Chief Operating Officer for a
period of four years, and

         WHEREAS, The Med-Design Corporation in order to ensure continuity
Management wishes to extend this Employment Agreement for one additional year,
and

         WHEREAS, David Dowsett is willing to continue his employment with said
Corporation for an additional year.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and undertakings
contained in this Agreement and with full knowledge of the content of this
Agreement and with the intent to be thereby legally bound, the parties have
agreed as follows:

         1. All terms of the Employment Agreement between The Med-Design
Corporation and David Dowsett dated May 15, 2002 are hereby ratified and
reaffirmed.

         2. The term of said Employment Agreement is hereby extended for one
additional year from May 15, 2006 to May 15, 2007.

         3. In consideration of David Dowsett's agreement to so extend the
Employment Agreement, an Option for him to purchase 37,500 shares of the
Company's common stock at $4.14 is issued to him on even date.

         This constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and cannot be
changed, abrogated or revoked except in a written agreement executed by the
parties.

         This Agreement is to be construed pursuant to the laws of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania without any consideration to its laws on conflicts
of law.

ATTEST:                             The Med-Design Corporation


--------------------------------    -----------------------------------
                                    By:
                                    Title:

WITNESS:



--------------------------------    -----------------------------------
                                    David Dowsett
Exhibit  31.2





ALPHATRADE.COM

A Nevada corporation

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

Section 302 Certification



I, KATHARINE JOHNSTON, certify that:



1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AlphaTrade.Com,

a Nevada corporation (the "registrant");



2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any

untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact

necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances

under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to

the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other information

included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material

respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows

of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this

quarterly report;



4.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for

establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as

defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d -15(e) for the

registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that

material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by

others within those entities, particularly during the period in which

this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls

and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions

about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as

of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such

evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's

internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the

small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business

issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that

has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,

the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting;

and















Exhibit 31.2 - 1



5.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based

on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial

reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of

registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent

function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the

design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which

are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to

record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or

other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's

internal controls over financial reporting.





Dated: April 21, 2010                         /s/ Katharine Johnston

---------------------------------

Its: Principal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of ROO Group,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robin
Smyth,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

            A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

August 22, 2005                        /s/ Robin Smyth
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Robin Smyth
                                       Chief Financial Officer
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT J. DAVIES, :

:

Plaintiff, : Case No. 05-CV-1569

:

v. :

: Judge McClure

JOANNE B. BARNHART, : Magistrate Judge Mannion

Commissioner of Social Security, :

:

Defendant. :

O R D E R

August 16, 2006

BACKGROUND:

On August 4, 2005, Robert J. Davies, commenced this civil action under 42

U.S.C. § 405(g), in order to obtain judicial review of the administrative decision by

the Commissioner of Social Security that denied plaintiff’s application for

disability benefits. Plaintiff filed an application for benefits on the basis of

depression and a tongue abnormality which was denied. After the application was

denied plaintiff requested a hearing. On January 28, 2005, following the hearing,

an ALJ issued an unfavorable decision. The Appeals Council denied plaintiff’s

request for review on June 9, 2005.

The matter was initially referred to Magistrate Judge Malachy E. Mannion.

Case 4:05-cv-01569-JFM Document 13 Filed 08/16/06 Page 1 of 3
-2-

On July 28, 2006, Magistrate Judge Mannion filed a 18-page report and

recommendation recommending that the plaintiff’s appeal from the decision of the

Commissioner of Social Security be denied. No objections have been filed to the

report and recommendation. We agree with the magistrate judge that substantial

evidence supports the Commissioner’s decision to deny plaintiff benefits.

DISCUSSION:

A district court reviews de novo those portions of a magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation to which a party objects. L.R. 72.3. The court may “accept,

reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the

magistrate judge.” Id.

Plaintiff has filed no objections to the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation. The report and recommendation is carefully reasoned and

addresses each of plaintiff’s six arguments raised on appeal. We will not waste

judicial resources by repeating the same.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Malachy

E. Mannion (Rec. Doc. No. 12), is adopted in full for the reasons set forth therein.

Case 4:05-cv-01569-JFM Document 13 Filed 08/16/06 Page 2 of 3
-3-

2. The appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security

is denied, and the action of the Commissioner is affirmed. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the case file.

s/James F. McClure, Jr.

James F. McClure, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 4:05-cv-01569-JFM Document 13 Filed 08/16/06 Page 3 of 3
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Raymond R. SLACK.

No. 61750.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1978.

In re: Raymond R. Slack applying for writs of review. Beauregard Parish.

Writ granted. An out of time appeal is ordered.

DIXON and MARCUS, JJ., dissent.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

C.M., the mother,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN and FAMILIES, 

and GUARDIAN AD LITEM,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-646

[May 30, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Carolyn Bell, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2018DP00551JK.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Paul O'Neil, Assistant Regional 

Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm 

Beach, for appellant.

Andrew Feigenbaum, Children's Legal Services, West Palm Beach, for 

appellee Department of Children and Families.

Thomasina Moore, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Laura J. Lee, 

Senior Attorney of Florida Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, 

Tallahassee, for appellee Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., WARNER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6110

KEITH BRIAN WHITAKER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-98-3663-AW)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Brian Whitaker, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General,

Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Keith Whitaker appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Whitaker v. Corcoran, No. CA-98-3663-AW (D.

Md. Jan. 7, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 267 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 267

   To designate the mountain at the Devils Tower National Monument, 
           Wyoming, as Devils Tower, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 2, 2023

  Ms. Lummis (for herself and Mr. Barrasso) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the mountain at the Devils Tower National Monument, 
           Wyoming, as Devils Tower, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DEVILS TOWER.

    (a) In General.--The mountain at the Devils Tower National 
Monument, Wyoming, located at 4435'26"N, by 10442'55"W, and the area 
located at 4435'21"N, by 10441'48"W, shall be known and designated as 
``Devils Tower''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, map, regulation, order, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the mountain 
and area described in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 
to ``Devils Tower''.
                                 <all>
```
1

Opinion issued October 6, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00685-CV

———————————

IN RE AMY WILLIAMS, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION*

Relator, Amy Williams, seeks mandamus relief from two orders signed July 

30, 2015, one temporarily terminating the writ of withholding until October 2, 

2015, and the other reinstating the writ on October 2, 2015. 

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. All pending motions are 

denied as moot.

 

* The underlying case is In the Interest of G.N.H., A Child, in the 309th District 

Court of Harris County, Cause No. 703024.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
#### James H. PRICE, individually and as a last director and trustee of James H. Price & Co., Inc., a dissolved Florida corporation, Appellant, v. A. J. ROME, Appellee.

No. 68-377.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 29, 1969.

Rehearing Denied May 27, 1969.

*253Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for appellant.

Joseph A. Perkins, Miami, and N. David Povich, Washington D. C., L. J. Cushman, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

This appeal by James H. Price is from a final order adjudicating the claim of A. J. Rome, the appellee, to 40,000 shares of stock in Airlift International, Inc. The instant appeal is one of several which have reached this court that concern various aspects of an action for a declaratory decree instituted by Airlift International, Inc., against James H. Price, A. J. Rome, and others to determine ownership of 1,704,274 shares of Airlift common stock.

In his answer to Airlift’s complaint, by a counterclaim against Airlift and by a cross-claim against Price, Rome alleged that he was the absolute owner of 40,000 shares of Airlift stock. He alleged that he purchased those shares from Price (through Robert M. Hewitt, another defendant to the main action) for $10,000. Rome later sold the 40,000 for about $156,000. Price’s answer to Rome’s cross-claim alleged that he was entitled to 22,000 shares of the 40,000 shares Rome claimed and that Rome was entitled to only 8,000 shares. After trial the court entered a final order which declared that Rome did in fact own 40,000 shares of Airlift International, Inc.

As we understand it, Price’s position is that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to find that Rome was Price’s confidential agent and should be made to account to him for what Price labels the unconscionable profit Rome made on the stock. Price urges that Rome was unjustly enriched at his expense and that a constructive trust (presumably on the proceeds of the stock sale) should be imposed in his favor. The record contains some evidence which arguably could support Price’s position, but that evidence is not clear and convincing. In order to have a court impose a constructive trust, the party seeking it must convince the court by clear proof that refusal to impose such a trust will amount to a fraud. Cf. Estey v. Vizor, Fla.App.1959, 113 So.2d 576. Moreover, there is substantial evidence contrary to Price’s position. Where there is substantial evidence to support the decision of a trial court, an appellate court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court in the absence of an abuse of discretion. Cohen v. Mohawk, Inc., Fla.1962, 137 So.2d 222; Sottile v. Mershon, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 481.

The appellants have failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion or other reversible error. Therefore the finding that A. J. Rome was the owner of 40,000 shares of Airlift International, Inc., stock is affirmed.

Affirmed.
#### Ex parte Calvin COLE.

77-698.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 25, 1978.

MADDOX, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

#### **CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

#### ** **

As independent registeredpublic accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of ourreport dated March 23, 2009 relating to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Ezenia! Inc. and subsidiaries for the years ended December 31,2008 and 2007 included in this Form 10-K into the Company’s previouslyfiled Registration Statements on Form S-8 File Nos. 33-96192, 333-85245,333-44984, 333-75824 and 333-125415.

 

 

/s/ VITALE, CATURANO &COMPANY, P.C.

 

Boston, Massachusetts

March 23, 2009

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2489]



[[Page 4987]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and 
Readiness).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In FR Doc. 96-32567 concerning a notice of proposed 
information collection available for comment on Department of Defense 
FY 1997: Assistance to Local Educational Agencies (LEAs), 0704-0389, 
appearing on page 67774 in the issue of Tuesday, December 24, 1996, 
change ``OMB Number:'' ``074-0388'' to read ``0704-0389.'' All other 
information remains unchanged.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness), 
(Department of Defense Domestic Dependent Elementary and Secondary 
Schools), ATTN: Mr. Norman Heitzman, 4040 North Fairfax Drive, 
Arlington, VA 22203-1635, telephone number (703) 696-4373.

    Dated: January 28, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-2489 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                          <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000             DEC-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         867,430                  21,849
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,184,888                 500,615
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,611,787                 820,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,901,038               1,399,218
<PP&E>                                         745,339                 465,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                 338,472                 149,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,142,696               2,055,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,053,750               3,440,653
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                    10,955,155               1,929,848
<OTHER-SE>                                (12,330,952)             (3,335,705)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,142,696               2,055,181
<SALES>                                      3,130,100               1,917,682
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,130,100               1,917,682
<CGS>                                        2,353,589               1,272,838
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,646,400               2,305,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,538                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,700,000                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             165,674                 230,827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,669,287)             (1,882,465)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,669,287)             (1,882,465)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,669,287)             (1,882,465)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.400)                 (0.130)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.400)                 (0.130)



</TABLE>