alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Europos Sąjungos C 104I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 104I |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 64 metai2021m. kovo 26d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 104I

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

64 metai2021m. kovo 26d.

---

| Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Pranešimai |
| | EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI |
| | Europos Komisija |
| 2021/C 104 I/01 | Europos Sąjungos kombinuotosios nomenklatūros paaiškinimai | 1 |

Turinys

Puslapis

IV   Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Europos Komisija

2021/C 104 I/01

Europos Sąjungos kombinuotosios nomenklatūros paaiškinimai

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

IV Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Europos Komisija

| 2021 3 26 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CI 104/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2021 3 26

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CI 104/1

---

Europos Sąjungos kombinuotosios nomenklatūros paaiškinimai

(2021/C 104 I/01)

Atsižvelgiant į Tarybos reglamento (EEB) Nr. 2658/87 (1) 9 straipsnio 1 dalies a punktą, Europos Sąjungos kombinuotosios nomenklatūros (2) paaiškinimai iš dalies keičiami taip:

369 puslapyje

8543 70 90 subpozicijos paaiškinimo antra pastraipa išbraukiama.

416 puslapyje

9506 69 90 paaiškinimo antra ir trečia pastraipa išbraukiamos ir pakeičiamos taip:

„Šiai subpozicijai nepriskiriami vadinamieji antistresiniai kamuoliukai, kurie yra kamuoliuko formos ir gali būti dekoruoti įvairiais būdais. Paprastai jie būna pagaminti iš plastiko arba gumos ir yra skirti maigyti rankomis atliekant streso mažinimo pratimus. Antistresiniai kamuoliukai ir panašūs įvairių formų ir dizaino antistresiniai gaminiai priskiriami 9503 pozicijai.“

---

(1)  1987 m. liepos 23 d. Tarybos reglamentas (EEB) Nr. 2658/87 dėl tarifų ir statistinės nomenklatūros bei dėl Bendrojo muitų tarifo (OL L 256, 1987 9 7, p. 1).

(2)  OL C 119, 2019 3 29, p. 1.

---
Case 4:05-cv-01088-TIV Document 7 Filed 06/17/05 Page 1 of 8
Case 4:05-cv-01088-TIV Document 7 Filed 06/17/05 Page 2 of 8
Case 4:05-cv-01088-TIV Document 7 Filed 06/17/05 Page 3 of 8
Case 4:05-cv-01088-TIV Document 7 Filed 06/17/05 Page 4 of 8
Case 4:05-cv-01088-TIV Document 7 Filed 06/17/05 Page 5 of 8
Case 4:05-cv-01088-TIV Document 7 Filed 06/17/05 Page 6 of 8
Case 4:05-cv-01088-TIV Document 7 Filed 06/17/05 Page 7 of 8
Case 4:05-cv-01088-TIV Document 7 Filed 06/17/05 Page 8 of 8
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Dave Brown [DBrown@spi-ind.com]

Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 9:08 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: Eric address... SPI contact

Eric Albright | Senior Manager

ENVIRON International Corporation | www.environcorp.com | ealbright@environcorp.com

19020 33rd Ave W | Suite #310 | Lynnwood, WA 98036

main: 425.412.1800 | fax: 425.672.1840 | direct: 425.412.1804 | cell: 206.909.0591

David C. Brown, PE

Environmental Affairs & Compliance Manager

Sierra Pacific Industries

19794 Riverside Avenue

Redding, CA 96049-6028

(530) 378-8179

(530) 378-8139 fax

(530) 391-7650 cell

 

CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This communication and any accompanying or attached document(s) are confidential and privileged. They are intended for the 

sole use of the addressee(s). If you receive this communication in error, you are advised that any use, disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in 

reliance upon this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately telephone Sierra Pacific Industries at (530) 378-

8179, and delete this message without copying it. Thank you.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50632 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus KEITH ALAN HILDERBRAND, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:03-CR-250-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Keith Alan Hilderbrand raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro , 377 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263), which held that Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), does not apply to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Edith P. REISS, Appellant, v. FELLOWSHIP OF BAPTISTS FOR HOME MISSIONS, INC., Appellee.

No. 68-810.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

April 22, 1969.

Rehearing Denied May 28, 1969.

M. S. Marlin, and Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for appellant.

Kevin A. Anderson, Hialeah, and Pod-hurst & Orseck, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of Haimovitz v. Robb, 130 Fla. 844, 178 So. 827 (1938).
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION









 




            




	

  


  	

  SCHNITZER INVESTMENT CORP.


  





3200

NW Yeon Avenue




P.O.

Box 10047




Portland,

Oregon 97296-0047




 




 




March 22, 1999




 




 




Mr. Robert W. Philip




Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc.




3200 N.W. Yeon Avenue




Portland, Oregon  97210




 




RE:  Lease Agreement dated September 1, 1998




Dear Bob:




Schnitzer

Investment Corp. (“SIC”) hereby agrees to adjust the rent of Schnitzer Steel

Industries, Inc. (“SSI”) for the buildings and land leased at 12005 North

Burgard Road under the referenced Lease Agreement.  The current rent through August of 2003, is $109,945.00 per

month.  Retroactive to March 1, 1999,

SIC is willing to adjust the monthly base rent as follows:




 




	

   


  	

  03/01/99 – 12/31/99


  	

   


  	

  $


  	

  82,118.00


  
	

   


  	

  01/01/00 – 12/31/00


  	

   


  	

  92,633.00


  
	

   


  	

  01/01/01 – 08/31/02


  	

   


  	

  126,767.00


  
	

   


  	

  09/01/02 –  08/31/03


  	

   


  	

  133,612.00


  





 




SSI will receive a

credit invoice for the overpayment in March of 1999.  If this adjustment is acceptable to you, please sign below and

return a fully-executed original of this letter to me.




 




	

  Very Truly Yours,


  	

   


  	

  Approved and Accepted:


  
	

   


  	

   


  	

   


  
	

  SCHNITZER INVESTMENT

  CORP.


  	

   


  	

  SCHNITZER STEEL

  INDUSTRIES, INC.


  
	

   


  	

   


  	

   


  
	

   


  	

   


  	

   


  
	

  /s/K. Novack


  	

   


  	

   


  	

  /s/R. Philip


  	

   


  
	

  Kenneth M. Novack


  	

   


  	

  Robert W. Philip


  
	

  President


  	

   


  	

  President


  
					





 




cc:       Barry A. Rosen




            Rebecca Widden




            Sherie Weisenberg
#### Hubert OWENS, alias Buddy Owens, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2125.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

June 24, 1969.

Louis R. Bowen, Jr., Public Defender, and Peter N. Smith, Special Asst. Public Defender, Orlando, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The issue raised by this appeal is grounded on the admissibility of relevant testimony as to collateral crimes committed by the appellant. Our view of the proceeding in the trial court substantiates the relevancy of the testimony of other crimes, which showed a pattern of criminality. Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654; Hawkins v. State, Fla.1968, 206 So.2d 5.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., and REED and Mc-CAIN, JJ., concur.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Hector Santos, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), rendered October 25, 2015, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of theft of services, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Michael D. Stallman, J.), rendered October 25, 2015, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, and surcharge, if paid, remitted.</p><p>As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived his <i>Boykin </i>rights (<i>see Boykin v Alabama</i>, 395 US 238, 242 [1969]; <i>People v Tyrell</i>, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013]). The People also agree that dismissal of the accusatory instrument is the appropriate corrective action in this particular case (<i>cf. People v Conceicao</i>, 26 NY3d 375, n 1 [2015]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: November 18, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Christopher L.Nelson, certify that:

1.                  I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 ofVCampus Corporation;

2.                  Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                                       Omitted;

4.                  The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a.                 designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which the annual report is being prepared;

b.                evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thereport based on such evaluation; and

c.                 disclosed in thereport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                  The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s independent registered public accounting firmand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a.                 all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b.                any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  |   | April 26, 2007 |   |   |   | By:    |   | /S/ CHRISTOPHER L. NELSON |
|--------|--------|----------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   |           |   |   |   |   |   | Christopher L. Nelson     |
|   |   |           |   |   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

----
#### Ms. Eddie P. THEARD et al. v. LOUISIANA HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES, NEW ORLEANS, La.

No. 61749.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1978.

Rehearing Denied April 28, 1978.

In re: Ms. Eddie P. Theard, et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the *434Court of Appeal, First Circuit. (Civil Service Commission). 354 So.2d 663.

Writ granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is reversed. Plaintiffs appeal before the Louisiana Civil Service Commission is reinstated.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents. I cannot agree with their ex parte orders whereby the court determines the merits of writ applications and renders judgment in chambers without granting the opposing party a hearing. A fundamental denial of due process is involved.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2697 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2697

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to modify the 
 definitions of the terms ``rural'' and ``rural area'' for purposes of 
 grants and loans to remedy a lack of compliance with certain drinking 
                water standards, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2023

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself and Mr. Padilla) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to modify the 
 definitions of the terms ``rural'' and ``rural area'' for purposes of 
 grants and loans to remedy a lack of compliance with certain drinking 
                water standards, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Drinking Water for Rural 
Communities Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF RURAL AND RURAL AREA.

    Section 343(a)(13)(B) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural 
Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1991(a)(13)(B)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``For the purpose'' and inserting the 
        following:
                            ``(i) In general.--Except as provided in 
                        clause (ii), for the purpose''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(ii) Projects for compliance.--For the 
                        purpose of grants and loans described in clause 
                        (i) to be used for projects to remedy a lack of 
                        compliance with enforceable Federal or State 
                        drinking water standards, the terms `rural' and 
                        `rural area' mean a city, town, or 
                        unincorporated area that has a population of 
                        not more than 20,000 inhabitants.''.
                                 <all>
```
|   | (1) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Oconee Financial Corporation (the      “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”)      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      August 14, 2008 | /s/      B. Amrey      Harden                               B. Amrey HardenChief      Executive Officer   |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| Dated:      August 14, 2008 | /s/      Steven A.      Rogers                               Steven A. RogersChief      Financial Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24359]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3954-000]


Unicom Power Marketing, Inc.; Notice of Filing

September 9, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 28, 1997, Unicom Power Marketing, Inc., 
tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests must be filed on or before September 19, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24359 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Byron Keith HOPKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1076.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 13, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 19, 1978.

Robert S. Appleton, Marathon, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN; JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Clawson v. Baker,*245 So.2d 223 (Fla.1971); *Schuty v. State,*281 So.2d 507 (Fla.1st DCA 1973); *State v. Jones,*285 So.2d 651 (Fla.3d DCA 1973); *Kelly v. State,*293 So.2d 786 (Fla.3d DCA 1974).
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Barry HACKETT.

No. 60474.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 16, 1977.

In re: Barry Hackett applying for supervisory and remedial writs.

Writ granted. Bail bond reduced to $30,-000.
#### William Henry RHODES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Josephine Robinson RHODES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13237.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

June 22, 1977.

Rehearing Denied, En Banc, Aug. 29, 1977.

Writ Refused Oct. 13, 1977.

Gamm, Greenberg & Kaplan by Alex Ru-benstein, Shreveport, for plaintiff-appellant.

Piper & Brown by Robert E. Piper, Jr., Shreveport, for defendant-appellee.

Before BOLIN, MARVIN and JONES, JJ.

MARVIN, Judge.

This appeal by the husband from a divorce judgment presents only issues of fact. He complains the lower court abused its discretion (1) in finding the wife not at fault, and (2) in awarding her $40 weekly permanent alimony. We affirm.

These parties were married in 1938 and more often than not, lived together until their final estrangement in 1972. Nine children were born of the marriage, eight of whom lived to reach adulthood. The husband brought suit for divorce in 1976, and the wife reconvened. On grounds of two-year separation in fact, the divorce was granted in the husband’s favor. His contentions that he was forced to separate because his wife threatened him with a knife were rejected below. The trial court instead accepted the contrary version of the wife, corroborated by a major daughter of the marriage.

A pendente lite alimony rule was heard four months before the trial on the merits. These proceedings, introduced at the trial on the merits by agreement “in an effort to save time,” support the award.

The record shows no abuse of discretion.

At appellant’s cost, judgment is

AFFIRMED.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Interim Adjustment of Consumers' Price Index: Correction of New Unit Bias in Rent Component of Consumers' Price Index and Relative Importance of Items

              																	United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 						*Interim Adjustment of Consumers' Price Index: Correction of New Unit Bias in Rent Component of Consumers' Price Index and Relative Importance of Items : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1039*,												Washington: 								U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 										1952,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4427,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER