alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MICHEAL ADAMS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2390

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 8, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

Micheal Adams, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed a postconviction motion raising three claims. He 

acknowledges that the notice of appeal is untimely as to the first two claims. In the 
2

third claim he asserts that the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) is improperly 

consecutively running the sentence imposed in Duval County case number 16-

2012-CF-3104 to the sentences imposed in 16-2011-CF-3527, even though he 

negotiated for concurrent imposition when he entered his plea in the 2012 case. He 

first approached the DOC to address this sentencing structure, and the DOC told 

him he needed to obtain a corrected judgment from the lower court in order to have 

the sentences run concurrently. The trial court denied the claim without any 

analysis or attachments conclusively refuting it.

As there is an October 24, 2012, revised judgment in the record of the 2012 

case, stating that the revision was to “Re-record to reflect concurrent sentence[,]” 

and which does indeed indicate the 2012 sentence was to be concurrently imposed 

to the 2011 sentences, we therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to either 

attach records conclusively refuting the appellant’s claim or to provide this revised 

judgment to the DOC. 

REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED IN PART, with directions.

WOLF, LEWIS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT AND NOTE

This Amendment No. 2 to Business Loan Agreement and Note (this "Amendment") is entered into effective as of July 1, 2001, between Tully's Coffee
Corporation ("Borrower") and Bank of America, N.A. ("Lender"") with reference to the following:

RECITALS

A.  Borrower
and Lender are parties to that certain Business Loan Agreement dated as of June 28, 2000, which was amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of
February 16, 2001 (collectively, the "Loan Agreement").

B.  Borrower
executed a Promissory Note with an original Principal Amount of $6,000,000.00 in favor of Lender dated as of June 28, 2000 (the "Note").

C.  The
parties hereto now desire to amend the Loan Agreement and the Note on the terms and conditions set forth below:

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1.Definitions.Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in the Loan Agreement and / or the Note.

2.Amendments.The Loan Agreement, Exhibit A to the Loan Agreement and the Note shall be amended
as follows:



3.Amendment Fee.Borrower will pay a $1,500.00 Amendment Fee on July 1, 2001, which shall be
fully earned and non-refundable unless Borrower satisfies all obligations of the Note and the Loan Agreement on or before that date.

---

4.Representations and Warranties.Borrower represents and warrants to Lender that (i) except as
otherwise waived by Lender in writing, no Event of Default under the Loan Agreement and the Note, and no event which, with notice or lapse of time or both, would become an Event of Default, has
occurred and is continuing; (ii) except as otherwise waived by Lender in writing, Borrower's representations and warranties made under the Loan Agreement are true as of the date hereof;
(iii) the making and performance by Borrower of this Amendment have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate
action; and (iv) no consent, approval, authorization, permit or license is required in connection with the making or performance of this Agreement.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

|BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. |  | TULLY'S COFFEE CORPORATION                               
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|By:                   |  | /s/NANCY NUERENBERGNancy Nuerenberg Senior Vice President

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
 TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q ofPlanktos
 Corp.for thequarterly
 period endedSeptember 30,
 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,Michael
 James Gobuty, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | Thisreport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of
the registrant for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:November
 23, 2009



/s/
 Michael James Gobuty

Michael
 James Gobuty

Chief
 Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Thiscertification
 accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
 except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
 registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report),
 irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.   A signed original of this written
 statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant
 and will be retained by the registrant
 and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



26
## I

N T H E C O U R

T O F C R I M I N A L A P P EA L S O F T EX A S
N O . A P - 75, 875

EX PA R TE JO SEP H M I C H A EL STE R LING , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 8 8 6 6 0 0 - A I N T HE 1 8 5 J UDI CI AL DI S TR I CT COURT TH FROM HA RRI S CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursu an t t o t h e provisions of Article 11.07 of the Te x as Code of Criminal Proce dure, the cler k of t he trial court tra

nsmitt ed to this Court thi s application for writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967) . Applicant wa s convicted of failure to reg ister
as a se x offe nder

and sente nced to twenty -s even y ear s’ imprisonment. The SeventhCourt of Appea ls affirme d his convict i o n . Sterling v. Texas , No. 07-02-0183- CR (Tex. App. – Amarillo, April 3, 2003, no pet.) Applicant conte nds, inte r a lia , that his tr ia l c ouns e l re nd e re d in e ff e c tiv e a ssi sta

nc e be c a us e he fa ile d to no te tha

t on e of the pr ior c on vic tio ns us e d to e nh anc e Ap pli c ant’ s p un ish me nt r ang e tothat of a ha bitual felony

offe nder w as not ava ilable for suc h use. The trial c ourt has dete rmined that trial counse l was ineff ective in that co u n s el allowed Applicant to plead “ true” at the punis h m en t s t age to the inva lid enhance ment, and that such ineffe ctive re prese ntation prejudice d Applicant in t hat t he jury was inst ructe d to sentence Applicant under the incorre ct punishment rang e. We find, there fore , that Applicant is en t i t l ed to a ne w p u n i s h m e n tt r i a l i nC a

u s e N o . 8 8 6 6 0 0
- A f

r o mt h e 1 8 5 thJ u d i c i a l D i s tr i c tC o urto f H ar r i s C o u n ty. The sente nce in that c ause is set a side, and Applica n t i s rema nded to the trial c ourt for a new sentenc ing tr ial. Copies of this opinion

s h a llb e s e nt t o th e T e xa s Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Marc h 19, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OPEN-FILE REPORT 80-303

UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PLATE 2of 2
122° 07" 30" ; 122° vot
‘ > os
48° 22" 30" ne Kod 48° 22' 30!

set
ee
1%
Y J
)
>)

cee
a
x)

cs
AS
Ks
ace!
oe
arent

OOY

Cs
ce
,
8,
Ce

OOOO
«

is

ce

a"

0%

sete
K

(
(4
pace
(
cy
RG
(4
ee
ee
“

(s
ne
se

nee:
ee

(
Re

(4
et
XK
EX
OS

4

LA
Y
ote
A

e,
Ke
4
1
Ut?

Q

re
KS

a.

48° 15°

48° 15!

122° 07" 30"

122° 00"

This report is preliminary and has not
been edited or reviewed for conformity
with Geological Survey standards and
nomenclature.

PRELIMINARY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE CLEAR LAKE SE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON

By
David P. Dethier, John T. Whetten, and Paul R. Carroll

1980
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE**

**SECURITIES      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.     | I                have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F/A of Algoma Steel Inc.;                and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     | Based                on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement                of a                material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make                the                statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements                were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this                report. |
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of RAVENWOOD BOURNE, LTD. (the "Company") for the quarter ended July 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Fotis Georgiadis, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Ravenwood Bourne, Ltd., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: September 14,  2011
/s/Fotis GeorgiadisFOTIS GEORGIADIS,Chief Executive Officer/s/Fotis GeorgiadisFOTIS GEORGIADIS,Chief Financial Officer
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Report of the Secretary of the Treasury on the War Finance Corporation (In Liquidation)

              																	United States. Department of the Treasury. 						*Report of the Secretary of the Treasury on the War Finance Corporation (In Liquidation)*,										February 12, 1930,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/142,			accessed on September 6, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2174 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2174

 To permit certain funds made available for the Wagner Service Unit of 
   the Indian Health Service to be used to pay expenses incurred in 
 keeping the emergency room of that Unit open 24 hours per day, 7 days 
                 per week, through September 30, 2006.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 21, 2005

   Mr. Thune introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To permit certain funds made available for the Wagner Service Unit of 
   the Indian Health Service to be used to pay expenses incurred in 
 keeping the emergency room of that Unit open 24 hours per day, 7 days 
                 per week, through September 30, 2006.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EMERGENCY SERVICES, WAGNER SERVICE UNIT, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not 
more than $500,000 of the amounts made available under the Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2005 (Public Law 108-447; 118 Stat. 3085) for staff 
quarters for the Wagner Service Unit of the Indian Health Service, may 
be used to pay the expenses incurred in keeping the emergency room of 
the Wagner Service Unit open 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, through 
September 30, 2006.
    (b) Excess Cost.--Any expenses incurred in keeping the emergency 
room of the Wagner Service Unit open 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, 
through September 30, 2006, in excess of the amount described in 
subsection (a) shall be paid by the Indian tribes served by the Wagner 
Service Unit.
    (c) Contracts and Compacts.--No Indian tribe shall take any share 
under a contract or compact under Federal law from amounts made 
available to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Case 4:06-cv-00715-JEJ Document 3 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:06-cv-00715-JEJ Document 3 Filed 05/03/06 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:06-cv-00715-JEJ Document 3 Filed 05/03/06 Page 3 of 3
#### PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD OF the TOWN OF ORANGE PARK, etc., Appellant, v. John EAGER and Melissa Eager, Appellees.

No. DD-477.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 7, 1977.

Claude L. Mullís, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Steven R. Heller, Jacksonville, for appel-lees.

SMITH, Acting Chief Judge.

The planning and zoning board of the Town of Orange Park appeals from a circuit court judgment granting appellees’ petition for writ of certiorari and ordering the Town to grant a zoning exception in a residential area to permit use of a seven and a half acre tract for a school. The board denied the exception on several stated grounds, among them that the property is too small for a school and that noise, traffic and other characteristics of a school would be inharmonious in the neighborhood. Appellees did not appeal to the Orange Park town council, as was their right under the ordinance code.

There was no showing in the circuit court that an appeal to the town council would have been futile. The council heard a prior appeal with evident consideration and concern. Resort to the circuit court was premature and certiorari should have been denied. See *Odham v. Foremost Dairies, Inc.,*128 So.2d 586 (Fla.1961); *DeCarlo v. Town of West Miami,*49 So.2d 596 (Fla.1950). Nor did the record before the circuit court demonstrate that the board acted arbitrarily. The assigned reasons for denying the exception had a basis in the informal record and were fairly debatable. *Rinker Materials Corp. v. Citizens and Property Owners, etc.,*313 So.2d 80 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

REVERSED.

ERVIN and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN MORENO HAINES,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

W. HILL, Associate Warden; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-17394

D.C. No. 5:06-cv-02211-RMW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 19, 2010** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Juan Moreno Haines, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that

defendants denied him access to the courts. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

FILED

AUG 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-17394

§ 1291. We review de novo. Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 815 (9th Cir. 1994)

(per curiam). We affirm. 

Haines contends that prison officials violated his right to access the courts

by not treating his letter to the California Claims Board as legal mail. The district

court properly granted summary judgment because Haines did not demonstrate that

the defendants caused him an actual injury. See Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343,

353-55 (1996) (explaining actual injury requirement).

Haines’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive. 

AFFIRMED.
255 La. 237

#### Ann R. WITT v. AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 50207.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1970.

In re: Ann R. Witt applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana. 226 So.2d 539.

The application is denied — There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
#### Thadeaus R. CULBERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-147.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

June 18, 1969.

Thadeaus R. Culberson, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Culberson has appealed the denial of his CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A., motion to vacate and set aside his conviction for the crime of manslaughter. This court earlier affirmed his conviction at 210 So.2d 248.

We have carefully studied appellant’s motion and brief, have reviewed the record and the law as it relates to the several points appellant has raised, and have concluded *364that the motion is wholly without merit and was properly denied. All of the points raised have either been previously disposed of on appellant’s direct appeal and are therefore res judicata, are not properly the subject of collateral attack, or are simply without merit.

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and HOBSON and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 6.39Exhibit
10.39

| | FIRST AMENDMENT TO BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT (ASSET BASED) | 
| | -------------------------------------------------------- | 

|Principal$1,200,000.00                                                                                                                                                                                                      | Loan Date09-01-2003 | Maturity04-15-2004 | Loan No | Call / Coll | Account0010130085 | Officer*** | Initials
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------ | ------- | ----------- | ----------------- | ---------- | --------
|References in the shaded area are for Lender's use only and do not limit the applicability of this document to any particular loan or
item.Any item above containing "***" has been omitted due to text length limitations.

|Borrower: | PORTLAND BREWING COMPANY2730 NW 31ST AVENUEPORTLAND, OR  97210 | Lender: | Washington Mutual BankBeaverton Commercial Banking Center12655 SW Center Street, Suite 500
Beaverton, OR  97005
|--------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

This FIRST AMENDMENT TO BUSINESS
LOAN AGREEMENT (ASSET BASED) is attached to and by this reference made a part of the
BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT (ASSET BASED) DATED SEPTEMBER 1, 2003 (the Agreement),
executed in connection with a loan or other financial accommodations between WASHINGTON
MUTUAL BANK (Lender) and PORTLAND BREWING COMPANY (Borrower).

The Agreement is amended as follows:

Page 6, under Definitions, Paragraph
titled Borrowing Base, modify to read as follows:

The words Borrowing Base mean,
as determined by Lender from time to time, the lesser of (1) $1,200,000.00 or (2) 80.000%
of the aggregate amount of Eligible Accounts.

Beginning on October 31, 2003, the
inventory advance will be incrementally decreased, as the following table shows:

|Date              | Advance Rate | 
|----------------- | ------------ | 
|Through 10/31/03  | 50.000%      | 
|11/01/03-11/30/03 | 40.000%      | 
|12/01/03-12/31/03 | 40.000%      | 
|01/01/04-01/31/04 | 40.000%      | 
|02/01/04-02/28/04 | 40.000%      | 
|03/01/04-03/21/04 | 30.000%      | 
|04/01/04-maturity | 20.000%      | 

All other terms and conditions of the
Agreement remain in full force and effect.

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO BUSINESS LOAN
AGREEMENT (ASSET BASED) DATED SEPTEMBER 1, 2003 IS EXECUTED ON DECEMBER 26, 2003.

BORROWER:

PORTLAND BREWING COMPANY

By:/s/ FREDERICK BOWMAN
        FREDERICK BOWMAN, President of PORTLAND   
     BREWING COMPANY

LENDER:

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

By:/s/ JEFFREY D. AULD
        Authorized Signer

---