alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDevelopment of the ITACA Network Loading Analysis Tool's Scheduling TechniquesNASA's SCENIC project aims to simplify and reduce the cost of space mission planning by creating analysis capabilities which are integrated with relevant analysis parameters specific to SCaN assets and SCaN supported user missions. The Integrated Tradespace Analysis of Communications Architectures (ITACA) will provide an all-in-one package for various analysis capabilities that normally require add-ons or multiple tools to complete. The ITACA tool will be responsible for assessing the given network architecture and generating a schedule for the missions as well as the assets. ITACA will allow users to evaluate the quality of service of a given network and determine whether or not the network will satisfy the mission's requirements. ITACA is currently under development, and during the spring of 2018 major development in the tools scheduling techniques were completed. A total of seven different techniques were completed.Document ID20180004447Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsOglio, Joseph M.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Welch, Bryan W.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 14, 2018Publication DateJune 1, 2018Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2018-219922E-19539GRC-E-DAA-TN57130Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 439432.07.01.03.02CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC16QA09DDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Keywordsspace communicationsAvailable DownloadsNameType20180004447.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**TITO GARCIA,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 351 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 17th day of November, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2204 

To validate certain conveyances made by the Union Pacific Railroad Company 

of lands located in Reno, Nevada, that were originally conveyed by 

the United States to facilitate construction of transcontinental railroads, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2006 

Mr. ENSIGN (for himself and Mr. REID) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To validate certain conveyances made by the Union Pacific 

Railroad Company of lands located in Reno, Nevada, 

that were originally conveyed by the United States to 

facilitate construction of transcontinental railroads, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VALIDATION OF RAIL CORRIDOR REAL PROP4 ERTY CONVEYANCES, RENO, NEVADA. 

5 (a) VALIDATION.— 

6 (1) CONVEYANCES COVERED BY MEMORANDUM

7 OF UNDERSTANDING.—The land conveyances that 
2 

•S 2204 IS

1 were made, or are to be made, to the City of Reno, 

2 Nevada, by the Union Pacific Railroad Company 

3 pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding for 

4 Reno Rail Corridor, as amended, entered into on De5 cember 1, 1998, between the City of Reno and the 

6 Union Pacific Railroad Company, and that comprise 

7 approximately 120 acres of land originally granted 

8 by the United States to the predecessor of the Union 

9 Pacific Railroad Company to facilitate construction 

10 of transcontinental railroads are valid to the extent 

11 that the conveyances would have been valid had the 

12 land involved in the conveyances been held by the 

13 Union Pacific Railroad Company in absolute or fee 

14 simple title at the time of the conveyances. 

15 (2) ADDITIONAL CONVEYANCE.—The land con16 veyance made to the City of Reno, Nevada, by CTB 

17 Inc., a Nevada Corporation, in the grant, bargain, 

18 and sale deed dated October 22, 2002, and involving 

19 a parcel of land situated in the NWSW of Section 

20 11, Township 19 North, Range 9 East, Mount Dia21 blo base and meridian, is valid to the extent that the 

22 conveyance would have been valid had the land in23 volved in the conveyance been held by CTB Inc. in 

24 absolute or fee simple title at the time of the convey25 ance. 
3 

•S 2204 IS

1 (b) RELEASE OF UNITED STATES INTERESTS.—All 

2 right, title, and interest of the United States in and to 

3 the land described in subsection (a) are released to the 

4 City of Reno, without consideration. 

5 (c) FILING OF INSTRUMENTS.—As soon as prac6 ticable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Sec7 retary of the Interior shall file, for recordation in the real 

8 property records of Washoe County, Nevada, such instru9 ments as may be necessary to document— 

10 (1) the validation of the land conveyances de11 scribed in subsection (a); and 

12 (2) the release of the interests of the United 

13 States under subsection (b). 

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.37

                          CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION
                               215 Fourier Avenue
                               Freemont, CA 94539


                                January 15, 2002

Mr. Keith L. Barnes

Dear Keith:

          Reference is made to (i) your employment agreement, dated March 25,
1998 (the "Employment Agreement"), by and between you and Integrated Measurement
Systems, Inc. and (ii) the letter agreement (the "Letter Agreement;" and
together with the Employment Agreement, the "Agreements"), dated August 1, 2001,
by and among, you, Integrated Measurement Systems, Inc. and Credence Systems
Corporation (the "Company").

          For good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree that notwithstanding the terms of the Agreements
or the relevant stock option agreements, to the extent that you are terminated
"without cause" as described in your Employment Agreement, the final exercise
date of any options which you are vested in pursuant to the terms of the
Agreements or the relevant stock option agreement on the date of such
termination shall be extended until the earlier of (i) the expiration of the
                                        -------
option term or (ii) the end of the twelve (12) month period following the date
of such termination.

          Please indicate your acceptance of the foregoing by signing the
enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to the Company.

                                               Very truly yours,

                                               /s/ Graham J. Siddall
                                               ---------------------
                                               Graham J. Siddall
                                               Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Chairman of the Board

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:



/s/ Keith L. Barnes
-------------------
Keith L. Barnes
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROGER ERNEST HEARE, SR., :

:

Petitioner :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-14-1257

:

SUPERINTENDENT BICKELL, : (Judge Brann)

:

Respondent :

ORDER

July 10, 2015

In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, filed as separate

record document no. 20, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.

BY THE COURT: 

 s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

United States District Judge

1

Case 4:14-cv-01257-MWB-JVW Document 21 Filed 07/09/15 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2150 

To direct the Secretary of Interior to convey certain Bureau of Land 

Management Land to the City of Eugene, Oregon. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20, 2005 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. SMITH) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Interior to convey certain Bureau 

of Land Management Land to the City of Eugene, Oregon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eugene Land Convey5 ance Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the city of 

9 Eugene, Oregon. 
2 

•S 2150 IS

1 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of the Interior. 

3 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE TO THE CITY OF EUGENE, OREGON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 60 days after the 

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall convey 

6 to the City, without consideration and subject to all valid 

7 existing rights, all right, title, and interest of the United 

8 States in and to the land described in subsection (b)(1) 

9 for the purposes of— 

10 (1) establishing a wildlife viewing area; and 

11 (2) the construction and operation of an envi12 ronmental education center. 

13 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.— 

14 (1) IN GENERAL.—The land referred to in sub15 section (a) is the parcel of approximately 12 acres 

16 of land under the administrative jurisdiction of the 

17 Bureau of Land Management in Lane County, Or18 egon, as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Red House 

19 Property’’ and dated April 11, 2005. 

20 (2) SURVEY.— 

21 (A) IN GENERAL.—The exact acreage and 

22 legal description of the land described in para23 graph (1) shall be determined by a survey ac24 ceptable to the Secretary, including an existing 

25 survey. 
3 

•S 2150 IS

1 (B) COST.—If the Secretary determines 

2 that a new survey of the land is required, the 

3 City shall be responsible for paying the cost of 

4 the survey. 

5 (c) REVERSION.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary determines 

7 that the land conveyed under subsection (a) is not 

8 being used for the purposes described in that sub9 section— 

10 (A) all right, title, and interest in and to 

11 the land (including any improvements to the 

12 land) shall revert to the United States; and 

13 (B) the United States shall have the right 

14 of immediate entry to the land. 

15 (2) HEARING.—Any determination of the Sec16 retary under paragraph (1) shall be made on the 

17 record after an opportunity for a hearing. 

18 (d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The 

19 Secretary may require such additional terms and condi20 tions for the conveyance under subsection (a) as the Sec21 retary determines to be appropriate to protect the inter22 ests of the United States. 

Æ
#### Robert E. EGGERS and Richardson Tractor Company, Appellants, v. Jimmie NARRON, Appellee.

No. 69-514.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 26, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 28, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Robert S. Hewitt, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.

4
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2121 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2121

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide housing loan benefits 
      for the purchase of residential cooperative apartment units.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 16, 2005

Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mr. Sarbanes, and Mr. Dayton) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide housing loan benefits 
      for the purchase of residential cooperative apartment units.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Housing Fairness Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. RESIDENTIAL COOPERATIVE HOUSING UNITS.

    (a) Housing Benefits for Cooperative Apartment Units.--Section 
3710(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 
paragraph (11) the following:
            ``(12) To purchase stock or membership in a development, 
        project, or structure of a cooperative housing corporation in 
        accordance with subsection (h).''.
    (b) Conditions of Housing Benefits for Cooperative Apartment 
Units.--Section 3710 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(h)(1) A loan may not be guaranteed under subsection (a)(12) 
unless--
            ``(A) the development, project, or structure of the 
        cooperative housing corporation complies with such criteria as 
        the Secretary prescribes in regulations; and
            ``(B) the dwelling unit that the purchase of stock or 
        membership in the development, project, or structure of the 
        cooperative housing corporation entitles the purchaser to 
        occupy is a single family residential unit.
    ``(2) In this subsection, the term `cooperative housing 
corporation' has the same meaning given such term in section 216(b)(1) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
    ``(3) When applying the term `value of the property' to a loan 
guaranteed under subsection (a)(12), such term means the appraised 
value of the stock or membership entitling the purchaser to the 
permanent occupancy of the dwelling unit in the development, project, 
or structure of the cooperative housing corporation.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Richard J. DODGE and Edison Archer, Appellants, v. James J. FLANIGAN and Mary E. Flanigan, his wife, James F. Sproule and Alice D. Sproule, his wife, Robert B. Meyer and Elizabeth M. Meyer, his wife, and Carl R. Overly, Appellees.

No. 69-652.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 26, 1970.

Dean, Adams, George & Wood and Don R. Livingstone, Miami, Roger H. Edwards, So. Miami, for appellants.

Richard C. Carter, Jr., Horton & Schwartz and Jeff D. Gautier, Miami, for appellees.

CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ. Before PEARSON, C. J., and

PER CURIAM.

The appellants Richard J. Dodge and Edison Archer sued the appellees, owners of a trailer park property, and the purchasers were joined on the theory that they had conspired with the sellers to effect the sale in a manner so as to deprive the brokers of their rightful commission. Summary judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiffs appealed.

Dodge alleged he was employed to procure a purchaser. Archer presented to the sellers two of the defendant purchasers. They concluded they were unable to finance the purchase. Thereafter they, with a third person, purchased the property. Archer, a separate broker, had no listing contract, but was acting with Dodge’s knowledge on the basis of a “co-operating broker.” Subsequently a sale was consummated. Clearly Archer was not entitled to recover. As to Dodge, the question in the trial court was whether his efforts were the procuring cause of the sale. On consideration of the record and briefs we find no basis to disturb the ruling of the trial court that it was made to appear without genuine triable issue of fact that the broker’s actions in relation to the matter were not such as to entitle him to a commission.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 4.1
  MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
 Warrant To Purchase Common Stock
 CA-001   Issuance Date
 Company Holder Warrant Initial Exercise Period Immediately Exercisable Warrant Shares Subsequent
Exercise Period Exercise Period Subsequently Exercisable Warrant Shares Warrant Shares Section 15 Warrant Purchase Agreement
 EXERCISE OF WARRANT
 Mechanics of Exercise Section 8 Exhibit A Exercise Notice




---



##### 



Aggregate Exercise Price Section 1(c) rd Exercise
Delivery Documents Transfer Agent DTC Section 1(a) Section 7(d)
 Exercise Price Exercise Price
 Cashless Exercise Net Number Cashless Exercise
 (A x B) - (A x C)
 2




---



##### 



A=
    
    the total number of shares with respect to which
this Warrant is then being exercised.B=
    
    the Closing Sale Price of the shares of Common
Stock on the date immediately preceding the date of the Exercise
Notice.C=
    
    the Exercise Price then in effect for
the applicable Warrant Shares at the time of such
exercise.
 Rule 144 Securities Act
 Disputes
 ADJUSTMENT OF EXERCISE PRICE AND NUMBER OF WARRANT SHARES Section 2
 RIGHTS UPON DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS
  Section
2
  3




---



##### 



Section 2
 Section 3
 TERMINATION
 NONCIRCUMVENTION
 WARRANT HOLDER NOT DEEMED A STOCKHOLDER
 4




---



##### 



REISSUANCE OF WARRANTS
 Transfer of Warrant Exhibit B Section 7(d)
 Lost, Stolen or Mutilated Warrant Section 7(d)
 Exchangeable for Multiple Warrants Section 7(d) provided however
 Issuance of New Warrants Section 7(a) Section 7(c)
 5




---



##### 



NOTICES Section 4.5
 AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
 GOVERNING LAW
 CONSTRUCTION; HEADINGS
 DISPUTE RESOLUTION Section 12
 6




---



##### 



REMEDIES, OTHER OBLIGATIONS, BREACHES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
 TRANSFER
 CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
 Bloomberg
 Business Day
 Closing Bid Price Closing Sale Price
 Common Stock
 Convertible Securities
 7




---



##### 



Eligible Market
 Expiration Date Holiday
 Options
 Person
 Principal Market
 Trading Day provided
 [Signature Page Follows]
 8




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANYBy:Name:
    Jesse SuttonTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 EXERCISE NOTICE
 TO BE EXECUTED BY THE REGISTERED HOLDER TO EXERCISE THIS
WARRANT TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK
 MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
 Warrant Shares Company Warrant
 Form of Exercise Price
 Cash Exercise
 Cashless Exercise
 Payment of Exercise Price
 Delivery of Warrant Shares
 
 Name
    of Registered Holder By:Name:Title:




---



##### 



ACKNOWLEDGMENT
 
 MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANYBy:Name:Title:




---



##### 



EXHIBIT B
 ASSIGNMENT FORM
 MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
   Name:(Please Print)Address:(Please Print)
EXHIBIT
 32



CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANICAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q
 ofPlanktos Corp.
 for the annual period endedMarch
 31, 2008
 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report),
 I,Robert Fisher, do hereby certify,
 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
 the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:May20,
 2008





/s/
 Robert Fisher

Robert
 Fisher, Chief Executive Officer and
 Chief Financial Officer



This
 certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
 except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant for the
 purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be
 incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any
 general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement
 required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to
 the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







23
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 23.1



              INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULES


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Northgate Innovations, Inc.




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Northgate Innovations, Inc. on Form S-8 (No. 333-36822) of our report, dated
April 12, 2002, included in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Northgate Innovations, Inc. for the years ended December 31,
2001 and 2000.

Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. The consolidated
supplemental schedule II, as shown on Item 8, is presented for purposes of
complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and is not a part
of the basic consolidated financial statements. This schedule has been subjected
to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the basic consolidated
financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material
respects in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole.



/s/  SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP

Los Angeles, California
April 12, 2002
#### ESTATE of Florence I. HERLAN, Deceased.

No. 38939.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 224 So.2d 434.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Paul W. Andre, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date: July 1, 2008



                                            By: /s/ PAUL W. ANDRE
                                                ___________________________
                                                    Paul W. Andre
                                                    Treasurer and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer