alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Ant onio, Texas** 

January 30, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00732

- CR

IN RE Michael Joseph GRIFFITH

,

From the 452nd District Court, Mason County, Texas

Trial Court No. 4285

- 91 and 4286

- 91

The Honorable Robert Rey Hofmann, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On December 20, 2017, this court conditionally granted relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus and we ordered the trial court to rule on relator’s pending “Motion for Appointment

of Attorney and the Granting of an Evidentiary Hearing.” On that same date, the trial court

denied relator’s pending motion. Since that date, relator has written letters to this court asking

for copies of p ages 38, 39, and 40 of a court reporter’s transcript. On January 9, 2018, we

informed relator, by letter, that this court does not believe it has the record he seeks.

On January 29, 2018, r elator filed a “M otion to Compel the 452nd Judicial District Court

to Discover, Locate and Produce Missing Court Transcripts

. ” Relator asks this court to direct the

trial court and/or the district clerk to “search and locate the court reporter’s transcripts” to locate

pages 38, 39

, and 40 for the purpose of proving his plea bargain agreemen t was void and illegal

. Presumably, relator plans to use the records in preparing an application for postconviction habeas

relief as authorized by Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 11.07.

Relator has no appeal or original proceeding pending in thi s court, therefore, we lack

jurisdiction to order the trial court and/or the district clerk to “search and locate the court

reporter’s transcripts” to locate pages 38, 39 and 40. Accordingly, relator’s motion is DENIED.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 4285

- 91 and 4286

- 91, styled State of Texas v. Michael Joseph Griffith

, formerly pending in the 198th Judicial District Court, Mason County, Texas. Relator’s mo tion was filed in the

452nd District Court, Mason County, Texas, the Honorable Robert Rey Hofmann presiding.It is so ORDERED on January 30, 2018

.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO :

______________________________ Keith E. Hottle

, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.58



                             SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT
                                  (Collateral)

THIS COLLATERAL SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT is made this 2nd day of November, 2001,
by and among MANCHESTER COMMERCIAL FINANCE LLC, a Minnesota limited liability
company located at 7400 Metro Boulevard, Suite 450, Minneapolis, MN 55439-2326
(the "Lender"), WAREFORCE INCORPORATED, a California corporation located at 2361
Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 155, El Segundo, CA 90245 (the "Junior Creditor"), and
BLM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Minnesota corporation located at 14700 28th Ave No.
Suite 30, Plymouth, MN 55447 (the "Borrower").

WHEREAS, the parties understand that Lender extends credit, or intends to extend
credit, to the Borrower on the security of accounts and other rights to payment
of money, inventory and proceeds, general intangibles, machinery and equipment,
fixtures, and other assets (the "Collateral"), but that Lender is unwilling to
continue or extend such credit unless its security interest in the Collateral
shall have priority and be senior to any security interest asserted by the
Junior Creditor with respect to the Collateral or proceeds thereof.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE that, notwithstanding any document or
filing or time of filing to the contrary, any rights, liens, or security
interests that the Junior Creditor has or may have or may acquire in the
Collateral or proceeds thereof shall be subject, junior and subordinate in all
respects to any rights, liens, or security interests which the Lender now has or
may hereafter acquire or assert in the Collateral. The Junior Creditor will not
take any action to realize on or repossess any of the Collateral, including
contacting the Borrower's account debtors or attempting to collect the
Borrower's accounts, without the prior written consent of the Lender. This
Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Agreement as of
the date first set forth above.

                                      MANCHESTER COMMERCIAL FINANCE LLC
                                      Lender

                                      By:
                                          --------------------------------------
                                      Title:  Executive Vice President

<PAGE>

                                      WAREFORCE INCORPORATED

                                      Junior Creditor

                                      By: /s/ Don Hughes
                                          --------------------------------------
                                      Title: Don Hughes, Chief Financial Officer


                                      BLM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                                      Borrower

                                      By: /s/ Ron Meinhardt
                                          --------------------------------------
                                      Title: Ron Meinhardt, President
2/4/2015 

## HARGROVE, MARCUS WAYK(e The Court has dismissed your application'for writ.of habeas corpus without written 

### order; the sentence has been discharged:..'Sec ExparteHarrington, 310 S.W.3d 452 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).

H3B OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

### OFFICIAL BUSINESS., ;,x. <: 

## state ©ftexas.v^jifir PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE 

# •'it T>.ttCt. Na 02 1R 0002003152 FEB09 2015 / 

## W&7&VW&FR0MzWWFiimiz

Abel Acosta, Clerk MARCUS WAYNE HARGROVE _ , _ . .,. _ 

### TDC#1928lT2tl

'1\
Exhibit 31.2  I, Dempsey Mork, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report for the period ended March 31, 2009 on Form 10-Q of China Holdings, Inc.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Nov. 19, 2009   /s/ Dempsey Mork Dempsey Mork Chief Financial Officer
# You are our greatest asset

/ Published Nov. 13, 2018

The results of the Defense Logistics Agency 2018 Denison Culture Climate Survey are in, and the findings illustrate noticeable progress.

While DLA received its highest ever Enterprise-wide score of 66 with improvements in all 12 indices, DLA Energy-specific results showed an even bigger improvement with an average index score of 83, up 22 points since the last time the survey was conducted in 2016.

“I’d like to say that DLA Energy has a strong reputation as a high-performing organization, and you are our greatest asset,” said DLA Energy Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Albert Miller in a recent DLA Energy video. “With a participation rate of 74 percent, I want to say thank you for taking the time to complete the survey. You responded, and we are listening.”

In the video, Miller and DLA Energy Deputy Commander Guy Beougher share some of the highlights from the survey results. Beougher noted that the biggest improvement was in the Consistency index Coordination and Integration categories. In this area, the score jumped 33 points, or 72 percent, indicating that DLA Energy has done better to reduce barriers and align strategic priorities across all levels so that employees can work together to achieve and execute common goals. 

To hear more about the results and the path forward, watch the video below. 

In an email to all employees Nov. 9, Beougher wrote that although scores have improved, there is still an opportunity to sustain and increase the results. 

“Over the course of the next several months, we’ll work to with your culture champions to address areas of concern and develop our Culture Action Plan,” he said.

Since 2003, DLA has assessed the culture of the workforce using the Denison Model of Organizational Culture and its survey instrument. The purpose of the survey is to provide a confidential mechanism for employees to share their feedback on their work environment. As a result, it provides an opportunity to engage DLA employees and leaders in thoughtful, data-driven discussions that will lead to informed action and improve our collective performance.

As outlined in the DLA People and Culture Plan, DLA strives to be a high-performing organization, and culture is key to driving organizational performance. The DLA Culture Climate Survey uses workforce input to identify the organization’s strengths and weaknesses from an enterprise perspective down to the work-unit level.
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 3140 Dir ID: 2015 - NM - 063 - AD
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: North-southasymmetry in solar spottedness and in great-storm sources.**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:5/12
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001068328
 
August 24, 2018
#### Ex parte Emory Ward ALDRIDGE, Jr.

No. 77-47.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 18, 1977.

TORBERT, Chief Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEAT-TY, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.13

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                            CALPINE CAPITAL TRUST IV

        THIS Certificate of Trust of Calpine Capital Trust IV (the "Trust"),
dated as of January 10, 2002, is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business
Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801 et seq.) (the "Act").

        1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is "Calpine
Capital Trust IV".

        2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the
Trust in the State of Delaware are Wilmington Trust Company, 1100 North Market
Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attn: Corporate Trust Administration.

        3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust,
have duly executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)
of the Act.

                                            WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its
                                            individual capacity, but solely as
                                            trustee of the Trust


                                            By: /s/ BRUCE L. BISSON
                                                --------------------------------
                                            Name: BRUCE L. BISSON
                                            Title: VICE PRESIDENT


                                               /s/ ANN B. CURTIS
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            ANN B. CURTIS, not in her individual
                                            capacity, but solely as trustee of
                                            the Trust
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25147]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Wage Committee, Notice of Meetings

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), in accordance with Pub. L. 
92-463, gives notice that meetings of the VA Wage Committee will be 
held on:

Wednesday, October 8, 1997, at 2:00 p.m.
Wednesday, October 22, 1997, at 2:00 p.m.
Wednesday, November 5, 1997, at 2:00 p.m.
Wednesday, November 19, 1997, at 2:00 p.m.
Wednesday, December 3, 1997, at 2:00 p.m.
Wednesday, December 17, 1997, at 2:00 p.m.

The meetings will be held in Room 246, Department of Veterans Affairs 
Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420.
    The Committee's purpose is to advise the Under Secretary for Health 
on the development and authorization of wage schedules for Federal Wage 
System (blue-collar) employees.
    At these meetings the Committee will consider wage survey 
specifications, wage survey data, local committee reports and 
recommendations, statistical analyses, and proposed wage schedules.
    All portions of the meetings will be closed to the public because 
the matters considered are related solely to the internal personnel 
rules and practices of the Department of Veterans Affairs and because 
the wage survey data considered by the Committee have been obtained 
from officials of private business establishments with a guarantee that 
the data will be held in confidence. Closure of the meetings is in 
accordance with subsection 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, as amended by Pub. 
L. 94-409, and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (2) and (4).
    However, members of the public are invited to submit material in 
writing to the Chairperson for the Committee's attention.
    Additional information concerning these meetings may be obtained 
from the Chairperson, VA Wage Committee (05), 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20420.

    Dated: September 16, 1997.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-25147 Filed 9-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
======================================================================
Household Finance Corporation
Revolving Home Equity Loan 
Asset Backed Certificates - Series 1995-1
P & S Agreement Date:              May 1, 1995
Original Settlement Date:          May 25, 1995
Series Number of Class A-1 Certificates:     441919AE7
Series Number of Class A-2 Certificates:     441919AF4
Original Sale Balance:             $474,825,000
======================================================================

                                                   Total 1996 (1)
                                             Sum of 1/22/96 - 12/20/96
                                                 Distribution Dates




Total Investor Distribution                        $159,506,623.66

Investor Interest Distribution Class A-1            $20,755,315.59
Investor Interest Distribution Class A-2               $918,654.84

Investor Principal Distribution Class A-1          $132,027,004.05
Investor Principal Distribution Class A-2            $5,805,649.18


(1) These amounts represent cash distributions paid by the trust
during the 1996 calendar year.  As such, they do not represent the
economic accrual of interest for tax purposes.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Niku Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended April 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Shahbazian, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1. the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. that information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Niku
Corporation for the period covered by the Report.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: June 14, 2004 |  | /S/ MICHAEL SHAHBAZIAN 
|                     |  | Michael Shahbazian     
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Niku Corporation and will be retained by Niku Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SHAUN REILLY
,
Defendant Below
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE
,
Plaintiff Below
, Appellee. § § § No. 175, 2018 § § Court Below

— Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. N17C

- 0 9

- 001 § § §

Submitted: April 25, 2018 Decided: April 26 , 2018

Before VALIHURA
, VAUGHN
, and SEITZ
, Justices.

ORDER

This 26 th day of April 2018
, having considered the notice to show cause and
the appellant’s response, it appears to the Court that :
(1) On April 5, 2018, the appellant, Shaun Reilly, filed a notice of appeal
from a Superior Court order, dated March 9, 2018, denying his motion f or appointment of counsel in an asset forfeiture case. The Senior Court Clerk issued a
notice directing Reilly to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for

his failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 in filing an appeal from an2

interlocu tory order. In his untimely response to the notice to show cause, 1 Reilly
address the merits of his motion for appointment of counsel

. He does not address
his failure to comply with Rule 42

. (2) The denial of a motion for appointment of counsel is an interlocutory

order for which appellate review is available only upon compliance with Supreme

Court Rule 42. 2 Absent compliance with Supreme Court Rule 42, this Court is

limited to the review of a tr ial court’s final judgment. 3 An order is deemed final and
appealable if the trial court has declared its intention that the order be the court’s

final act in the case. 4 The Superior Court proceedings are ongoing

. Reilly’s failure
to comply with Rule 42 requires the dismissal of this appeal.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29 (b ),

that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr. Justice

1 A party must respond to the notice to show cause within ten days after receipt of the notice. Supr. Ct. R. 29(b). Reilly received the notice to show cause before April 12, 2018, but did not file his response until April 25, 2018, making his appeal subje ct to dismissal. Supr. Ct. R. 3(b)(2). 2 Abdul

- Akbar v. Wynn/D.C.S. E. , 1989 WL 27731 , at *1 (Del. Feb. 10, 1989)

. 3 Julian v. State , 440 A.2d 990, 991 (Del. 1982). 4 J.I. Kislak Mortg. Corp. v. William Matthews, Builder, Inc. , 303 A.2d 648, 650 (Del. 1973).
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40104 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

JULIO CESAR MARTINEZ

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16

- CR

- 1124

- 3

Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Julio Cesar Martinez has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Martinez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed co unsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5
, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 22, 2017
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40104 Document: 00514246966 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/22/2017No. 17

- 40104

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

e xcused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-40104 Document: 00514246966 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/22/2017