alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Julius STONEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-23.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 13, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 16, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William M. Grodnick, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Section 948.06, Florida Statutes. *See also State v. Jones,*327 So.2d 18 (Fla.1976). *Cf. Deese v. Cochran,*139 So.2d 429 (Fla.1962).
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Niku Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Joshua Pickus, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Shahbazian as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge, respectively:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: June 8, 2005 |  | /S/ JOSHUA PICKUS      
|                    |  | Joshua Pickus          
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                    | 
|Dated: June 8, 2005 |  | /S/ MICHAEL SHAHBAZIAN 
|                    |  | Michael Shahbazian     
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-5103

_____________________________

CHARLES LITTON MORRIS,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

April 2, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed. 

ROBERTS, RAY, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Charles Litton Morris, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 181 (Thursday, September 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49032-49033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24792]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NORTHEAST DAIRY COMPACT COMMISSION


Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Northeast Dairy Compact Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Compact Commission will hold its monthly meeting to 
consider certain technical amendments to the bylaws, matters relating 
to administration and relating to

[[Page 49033]]

enforcement of the price regulation, and to deliberate and make final 
rulings in certain petitions for exemption from operation of the price 
regulation.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for September 25, 1997, 9:00 a.m. to 
4:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Cat 'n Fiddle Restaurant, 
118 Manchester Street, in Concord, NH.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Smith, Executive Director, Northeast Dairy Compact Commission, 
43 State Street, PO Box 1058, Montpelier, VT 05601. Telephone (802) 
229-1941.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Compact 
Commission will hold its regular monthly meeting. The Commission will 
consider certain technical amendments to the bylaws and matters 
relating to administration, as well as guidelines for enforcement of 
the compact over-order price regulation. The Commission will also 
deliberate and make final rulings in certain administrative petitions 
for exemption from operation of the price regulation. See 62 FR 35065 
(June 30, 1997).

(Authority: (a) Article V, Section 11 of the Northeast Interstate 
Dairy Compact, and all other applicable Articles and Sections, as 
approved by Section 147, of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and 
Reform Act (FAIR ACT), Pub. L. 104-127, and as thereby set forth in 
S.J. Res. 28(1)(b) of the 104th Congress (codified at 7 U.S.C. 
7256); Finding of Compelling Public Interest by United States 
Department of Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman, August 8, 1996 and 
March 20, 1997. (b) Bylaws of the Northeast Dairy Compact 
Commission, adopted November 21, 1996.
Daniel Smith,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-24792 Filed 9-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1650-01-P-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

This certification set forth below is hereby madesolely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any otherpurposes.

In connection with the Annual Report of Ezenia! Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Khoa D. Nguyen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
| Date: April 27, 2005 | By:    | /s/ KHOA D.  NGUYEN       |   |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Khoa D. Nguyen            |
|                 |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |
|                 |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
Searched for **https://www.rrb.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.rrb.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### Dan Terry GRIFFIN and Larry Hammett v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50470.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 10, 1978.

Joe Meng, John R. Junkin, II, Natchez, for appellants.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Marvin L. White, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before SMITH, P. J., and SUGG and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., ROBERTSON, P. J., and WALKER, LEE, BOWLING and COF-ER, JJ., concur.
#### Bobby Allen BYNUM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-150.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 2, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
# Adopt-a-Family Program lets employees spread goodwill, Christmas cheer to HQC families

/ Published Dec. 6, 2018

McNamara Headquarters Complex employees can spread their Christmas cheer and goodwill with fellow employees through the Annual Adopt-a-Family Program.

Sponsored by the DLA Chaplain’s Office, the program provides presents for children of current employees, including those from the Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Defense Technical Information Center and Defense Contract Audit Agency. 

Adoptions can be done by offices or individuals and are made on a first-come, first-served basis until all families are adopted. The chaplain’s office manages families’ wish lists and coordinates deliveries and asks that gifts be addressed to specific children, wrapped and provided to the chaplain’s office by Dec. 14. 

Last year, 113 children from 37 families received gifts through the program. Parents of children who received gifts expressed profound gratitude in letters to the chaplain’s office.

“I was hesitant to submit my family because we have so many children but am glad I did,” wrote one parent. “We are extremely grateful for all that was purchased and enjoyed Christmas that much more because of the spirit and goodwill from all of those involved. Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!

For more information or to participate, visit the chaplain’s office in Suite 1344, email dlachaplain@dla.mil or call 571-767-0242/2132.
#### Jack HATCHER and Ermina Hatcher, his wife, Appellants, v. Broward WILLIAMS, as Insurance Commissioner, Honorable Ruth L. Sutton, as Justice of the Peace, Allstate Insurance Co., State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Perrine-Cutler Ridge Insurance Agency, Inc., successors to Castleberry & Associate a/k/a Castleberry, Inc., J. P. Kendrick as Constable, and Gail C. Vlad, Appellees.

No. 69-165.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 5, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 9, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# L_2023192EN.01001101.xml

| 31.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 192/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 192/11

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/1571

of 24 July 2023

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Българско бяло саламурено сирене/Bulgarsko byalo salamureno sirene’ (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Bulgaria’s application to register the name ‘Българско бяло саламурено сирене/Bulgarsko byalo salamureno sirene’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Bulgaria’s application to register the name ‘Българско бяло саламурено сирене/Bulgarsko byalo salamureno sirene’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Българско бяло саламурено сирене/Bulgarsko byalo salamureno sirene’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Българско бяло саламурено сирене/Bulgarsko byalo salamureno sirene’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Българско бяло саламурено сирене/Bulgarsko byalo salamureno sirene’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.3. Cheeses, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 July 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 129, 13.4.2023, p. 67.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 21

- 00296

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021

- 0 04833

- 1

Before Bassel , Womack, and W alla c h , JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### C EDRIC 

### W INGFIELD AND 

### A LL 

### O THER 

### O CCUPANTS 

### , Appellant s

V



### . C ANDLETREE 

### A PARTMENTS 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT On January 31, 2022, we notified A ppellant s that their brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We s tated that we c ould dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless , within ten days, A ppellant s filed

with the court a n appellant s ’ brief and a n accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See T ex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have received no response.
Because A ppellant s have failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered : March 3, 2022
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48235-48238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24289]



[[Page 48235]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 97-38]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Assistance Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/CPD, (703) 
604-6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 97-38, with attached transmittal and 
policy justification pages.

    Dated: September 9, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5000-04-M

[[Page 48236]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15SE97.028



[[Page 48237]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15SE97.029



[[Page 48238]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN15SE97.030



[FR Doc. 97-24289 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-C
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS
TENET HO SPI TAL S L I MI TED, A TE XA S L I MI TE D PA RTN ERS HI P, D/ B /A SI ERR

A M ED I CA LCEN TE R, Ap pe lla nt,

v. ARMI DA PORTI L L O, I

NDI VI DUAL L Y, AS I NDEPENDEN T EXECUTRI X OF TH E E STA TE OF ELVI RA M. CUEL L AR, DECEASED, AND O N B EH AL F OF AL LSTA TU TO RY WR ONGF UL

DEATH B ENEF I CI ARI ES OF E L VI RA M. CUEL L AR, DECEASED, Ap pe lle e s. § § § § § § § § § No . 0 8- 08 -0 02 42 -C V

Appea l from 327th District Court of El Paso County , Texas (TC # 2005-6164)

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION Pe nd ingbe fo re the Court is Ap pe lla nt, Te ne t Ho sp ita l’ s un op po se d mot ion to d ism iss thi s appea l pursuant to T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a) (1) a nd 43

. 2(f) . Be cause the par ties have se ttled the disputes underlying this appe al, we w ill gra nt Appellant’s motion and dismiss t he appe al. Appellant re prese nts to the Court that the pa rties to this appeal have rea ched a n ag ree ment resolving the disputes underlying this appe al. Appellee s have not objec ted to the motion, and there is n o in dicat ion

that di smi ssa l w ou ld p re ve nt A pp e lle e s f

ro m any re lie f t o w hic h th e y

wo uld otherwise be entitled. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(a) (1). Appe llant’s motion is there fore g rante d, and the a pp e a l dis mis se d. Cos ts wi ll be ta xed a g a ins t the pa rt y inc ur ri ngthe same in a c c or da

nc e wi th the par ties’ ag ree ment. See Tex.R.App.P . 42.1(d).

Fe bruar y 5, 2009ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, J ustice

B e f o r e C h e w , C

. J. , M c C l u r e , a n d C ar r , JJ. Chew, C.J ., not participating Carr, J., not participating
#### Albert ROBERTSON et al. v. Inetha HANDY et al.

No. 61669.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1978.

In re: City of Bogalusa applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Washington. 354 So.2d 626.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ., are of the opinion that a writ should be granted.
**Exhibit 99.8**

 

**Section 906Certification**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

*18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:*

 

In connection with this Amendment No. 2 to annual****report of VCampus Corporation onForm 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof, theundersigned, in his capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

1.        This report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

 

2.        The information contained in this report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operation ofVCampus Corporation as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 
| Date: July 3, 2003 |                       |
|--------------------|----------------------------|
|               |                       |
|               |                       |
|               | /s/ NARASIMHAN P. KANNAN   |
|               | Narasimhan P. Kannan       |
|               | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors
USDATA Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-65505 and 333-82927) of USDATA Corporation of our report dated
February 12, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of USDATA
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related financial
statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report
on Form 10-K of USDATA Corporation.



                                    KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 28, 2000
#### Allen Eric BUTLER, also known as Ralph Allen Jones, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 39746.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 2, 1971.

Appeal dismissed sua sponte.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-1704

Plaintiff : 

(JUDGE MANNION)

v. :

 

JOHN DOE subscriber assigned :

IP address 73.52.66.49,

:

Defendant

:

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of this date, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT the court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Serve

Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference (Doc. 4), subject to

the conditions below:

1. Plaintiff may serve a Rule 45 subpoena upon the third party

internet service provider Comcast Cable (the “ISP”), for the

purpose of obtaining information necessary to identify the

individual assigned with the IP address 73.52.66.49 (“John

Doe Defendant”), specifically his or her name and address.

The subpoena shall have a copy of this order attached;

2. The ISP will have fourteen (14) days from the date of

service of the Rule 45 subpoena to serve the John Doe

Defendant with a copy of the subpoena and a copy of this

order. The ISP may serve the John Doe Defendant using

any reasonable means, including written notice sent to his

or her last known address, transmitted either by first-class

mail or via overnight service;

Case 3:15-cv-01704-MEM Document 9 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 2
3. The John Doe Defendant shall have fourteen (14) days

from the date of service of the Rule 45 subpoena to file any

motions with this court contesting the subpoena (including

a motion to quash or modify the subpoena). The ISP may

not turn over the John Doe Defendant’s identifying

information to Plaintiff before the expiration of this 28 day

period. Additionally, if the John Doe Defendant or ISP files

a motion to quash the subpoena, the ISP shall not produce

any information to Plaintiff until the court issues an order

instructing the ISP to resume production of the requested

discovery. If the John Doe Defendant moves to quash or

modify the subpoena, the John Doe Defendant shall

contemporaneously notify the ISP so that the ISP is on

notice not to release the John Doe Defendant’s contact

information to Plaintiff until the rules on any such motion;

4. If the 28 day period lapses without the John Doe

Defendant or ISP contesting the subpoena, the ISP shall

have fourteen (14) days to produce the information

responsive to the subpoena to Plaintiff;

5. The ISP shall preserve any subpoenaed information

pending the resolution of any timely-filed motion to quash;

6. Any information ultimately disclosed to Plaintiff in response

to a Rule 45 subpoena may be used by Plaintiff solely for

the purpose of litigating the instant case.

s/ Malachy E. Mannion 

MALACHY E. MANNION

United States District Judge

DATED: September 30, 2015

O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2015 MEMORANDA\15-1704-01-ORDER.wpd

2

Case 3:15-cv-01704-MEM Document 9 Filed 09/30/15 Page 2 of 2
#### Allan Anthony JENKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-581.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 14, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.