alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-174-004]


Gulf States Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

August 27, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 22, 1997 Gulf States Transmission 
Corporation (GSTC) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 1, certain tariff sheets to be effective November 
1, 1997.
    GSTC states that the purpose of the filing is to comply with the 
Commission's Order No. 587C, issued March 4, 1997 in Docket No. RM96-1-
004.
    GSTC has modified its tariff to insert the revised and new GISB 
standards accepted by the Commission in Order No. 587-C.
    GSTC states that copies of the filing are being mailed to its 
jurisdictional customers and interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23271 Filed 9-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C. [ •**'~'**Jr ,,

### on-

## 2 r)

## 2·.-- "' \:.. ;·-· . )j

Motion of AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, B-43) DOT-OST-1996-1203

MOTION OFAMERICANAIRLINES, INC. FOR

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDERRULE 12
Communications with respect to this document shouldbe sent to: FRANCIS C. HElL Managing Director

- Legal and Government Affairs American Airlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-5642 francis.heil@aa.com
March 30, 2015Motion of BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C.

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, B-43) DOT-OST-1996-1203

MOTION OF AMERICANAIRLINES, INC. FOR

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12
American Airlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, hereby
moves that its Form 41, B-43 for YE2014, be accorded confidential treatment and withheld frompublic disclosure. The information for which confidential treatment is requested pertains to American's airframe and aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements. In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on SubmittingAirline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 41582, July 16, 2010, we are uploading our confidential report electronically to http://esubmit.rita.dot.gov On June 5, 1995, by letter of James W. Mitchell, Director, Office of Airline Statistics, the Department granted confidential treatment for a 10-yearperiod to similar data filed byAmerican. For the reasons stated in that letter, the current submission should also receive confidential treatment for 10 years.

### 2 -
WHEREFORE, Americanmoves that the schedule being submitted electronically to the above-referencedwebsite be withheld frompublic disclosure under Rule 12 for a period of 10 years.

March 30, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

Francis C. Heil SeniorAttorney AmericanAirlines, Inc.
EXHIBIT
31.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Susan
B. Reilly, certify that:




1.           I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) of Ministry
Partners Investment Corporation (the “Company”);


2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;


4.           The
Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Company and we have:


(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;


(b)           Intentionally
omitted;


(c)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation;


(d)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter (the
Company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
material affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's
internal control over financial reporting; and


5.            The
Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):


(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and


(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting.









Date:
      May 5, 2008
            By:
      /s/ Susan B
      ReillySusan
      B Reilly,Principal
      Accounting Officer
**Exhibit32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of SITEL Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James F. Lynch, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  James F. Lynch                       |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| James  F. Lynch

Chief  Executive Officer |
|                                      |
| March 16,  2005                      |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24360]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. OA96-38-000]


Long Island Lighting Company; Notice of Filing

September 9, 1997.
    Take notice that on June 25, 1997, Long Island Lighting Company 
tendered for filing its refund report in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest said filing should file 
a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests must be filed on or before September 19, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24360 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
256 La. 266

#### Eugene J. POCHE, Jr., et al. v. Bobby FRAZIER et al.

No. 50533.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Eugene J. Poche, Jr., et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. Charles. 232 So.2d 851.

The application is denied. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of and according to the facts, as found by the Court of Appeal, the judgment is corect. However, plaintiffs’ right to recover all or any medical expenses incurred since the trial of the case is reserved.

SUMMERS, Justice,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. In granting the right to claim future medical expenses this Court has reversed the Court of Appeal finding that there was no proof to support that claim. The Court’s action is taken on the basis of an application for writs without the benefit of the record evidence, an action unprecedented in the jurisprudence of this Court. Moreover, no plausible or convincing reason is assigned by the Court of Appeal for reducing the awards, and that action of the Court should be reviewed.
Reveam, Inc. v Taylor Frères Capital Mkts., LLC

2023 NY Slip Op 34555(U)

December 29, 2023

Supreme Court, New York County

Docket Number: Index No. 655074/2021

Judge: Joel M. Cohen

Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York

State and local government sources, including the New

York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service.

This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official

publication.
[* 1]
[* 2]
[* 3]
[* 4]
[* 5]
[* 6]
[* 7]
[* 8]
[* 9]
[* 10]
[* 11]
[* 12]
[* 13]
[* 14]
[* 15]
[* 16]
[* 17]
[* 18]
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2439]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3661]


Johnson & Collins Research, Inc., et al.; Prohibited Trade 
Practices, and Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order prohibits, among other things, a 
Minnesota-based company and its officer from misrepresenting the 
efficacy and results of their weight-loss products, and requires the 
respondents to disclose that such product consists primarily of a 
booklet or pamphlet containing information and advice on weight loss, 
and to possess competent and reliable scientific evidence to 
substantiate any future advertisements for weight-loss booklets or for 
other weight-loss products or programs.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued May 31, 1996.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Cleland, FTC/S-4002, Washington, D.C. 20580. (202) 326-3088.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Tuesday, March 26, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 61 FR 13199, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Johnson & Collins Research, 
Inc., et al., for the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested 
parties were given sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, 
suggestions or objections regarding the proposed form of the order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to cease and 
desist, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2439 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10-a-1

                                                                       EXHIBIT 1


                               NORDSON CORPORATION

                            1995 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE
                                COMPENSATION PLAN

                      ELIGIBLE POSITIONS FOR 2001 PLAN YEAR


-        President and Chief Executive Officer

-        Executive Vice President

-        Sr. Vice President

-        Vice President

-        Vice President - Corporate Research and Technology

-        Vice President - Finance and Controller

-        Vice President - Manufacturing

-        Vice President - Human Resources
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1099

BABATUNDE BIODUN OTUBANJO,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. 

Submitted: August 26, 2008 Decided: September 4, 2008

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Irena I. Karpinski, LAW OFFICES OF IRENA I. KARPINSKI, Washington,

D.C., for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney

General, Francis Fraser, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jason Xavier

Hamilton, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Babatunde Biodun Otubanjo, a native and citizen of

Nigeria, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals adopting and affirming the decision of the Immigration

Judge denying his request for a continuance for adjudication of a

petition for alien relative. We have carefully reviewed the record

and conclude that the decision to deny a continuance was not an

abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (2008); Onyeme v. INS,

146 F.3d 227, 231 (4th Cir. 1998). We accordingly deny the

petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>

                         Independent Auditors' Consent
                         -----------------------------

The Supervisory Board of
Siemens AG:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-13428) on Form S-8 of Siemens AG of our report dated November 29, 2001,
except for footnote 31 as to which the date is December 6, 2001, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Siemens AG and subsidiaries as of September 30,
2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows
and changes in shareholders' equity for each of the years in the three-year
period ended September 30, 2001, which report appears in the annual report on
Form 20-F of Siemens AG for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001.

                                      /s/ KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft AG

Munich, Germany
December 18, 2001
```

[115th Congress Public Law 151]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 1235]]

Public Law 115-151
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 1300 Main Street in Belmar, New Jersey, as the ``Dr. Walter S. McAfee 
     Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Mar. 23, 2018 -  [H.R. 3655]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DR. WALTER S. MCAFEE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1300 Main Street in Belmar, New Jersey, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Dr. Walter S. McAfee Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dr. Walter 
S. McAfee Post Office Building''.

    Approved March 23, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3655:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 163 (2017):
                                    Dec. 12, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 164 (2018):
                                    Mar. 7, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
1

The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-1955

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

$18,100.00 in United States Currency; * Western District of Arkansas.

*

Defendant, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Patricia L. Booker, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: July 7, 2006

Filed: July 10, 2006

___________

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Patricia L. Booker appeals the judgment of the district court1

 denying her claim

in this civil forfeiture action under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). After our careful review,

we conclude that the district court properly determined Booker did not establish an
-2-

ownership interest in the defendant currency. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B. 

______________________________
June 10, 2015 

Mr. Michael Bytner 

Weaver Consultants Group 

1813 North Mill Street 

Naperville, IL 60563 

Dear Mr. Bytner: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 14, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1580), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 177 (Friday, September 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48061-48062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24230]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 090897A]


Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Council) Groundfish 
Management Team (GMT) will hold a public meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, September 29, 1997 at 1:00 
p.m. and will continue through Friday, October 3, 1997. The Tuesday 
through Friday sessions will begin at 8:00 a.m. and may go into the 
evening until business for the day is completed.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the conference room at the 
Council office, 2130 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 224, Portland, OR 97201.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Glock, Groundfish Fishery 
Management Coordinator; telephone: (503) 326-6352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The primary purpose of the meeting is to 
prepare analyses and reports for the Council's November 1997 meeting. 
The GMT will address topics as drafting assignments are prepared and 
completed during this meeting. As a result, daily agendas or schedules 
will not be available in advance of the

[[Page 48062]]

meeting. However, proposed items that may be discussed by the GMT in 
preparation for the Council's November meeting include development of 
final acceptable biological catch and harvest guideline recommendations 
for 1998, review and analysis of proposed management options for 1998, 
inseason catch projections for the remainder of 1997, and preparation 
of fishery management plan amendments, the Stock Assessment and Fishery 
Evaluation document, and the Draft Environmental Assessment for 
Proposed Harvest Levels.
    Although other issues may come before the GMT for discussion, in 
accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, those issues may not be the subject of formal GMT 
action during this meeting. GMT action will be restricted to those 
issues specifically identified in this notice.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Eric Greene at (503) 326-6352 at least 5 days 
prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: September 8, 1997.
Gary C. Matlock,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-24230 Filed 9-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
#### Jan Kemper ASHMORE, formerly known as Jan Kemper Stevens, Appellant, v. W. James STEVENS, Appellee.

No. 70-340.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 11, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Robert S. Hewitt, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.