49708 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 1997 / Notices

General for the Environment and

Natural Resources Division, Department

of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and

should refer to United States v. Atlantic

Richfield Co., DOJ Ref. Number 90–11–

2–703.

The proposed consent decree may be

examined at the Office of the United

States Attorney, Connecticut Financial

Center, 157 Church St., New Haven, CT

06510, the New England Region Office

of the Environmental Protection

Agency, JFK Federal Building, Boston,

MA 02203–2211; and at the Consent

Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th

Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, (202)

624 0892. A copy of the proposed

consent decree may be obtained in

person or by mail from the Consent

Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W. 4th

Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In

requesting a copy, please refer to the

referenced case and enclose a check in

the amount of $7.25 for the Consent

Degree (25 cents per page reproduction

costs), payable to the Consent Decree

Library.

Bruce S. Gelber,

Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement

Section, Environment and Natural Resources

Division.

[FR Doc. 97–25220 Filed 9–22–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary

Submission for OMB Review;

Comment Request

September 18, 1997.

The Department of Labor (DOL) has

submitted the following public

information collection request (ICR) to

the Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) for review and approval in

accordance with the Paperwork

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,

44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). A copy of this

individual ICR, with applicable

supporting documentation, may be

obtained by calling the Department of

Labor, Departmental Clearance Officer,

Theresa M. O’Malley ((202) 219–5096

ext. 143) or by E-Mail to OMalleyTheresa@dol.gov. Individuals who use a

telecommunications device for the deaf

(TTY/TDD) may call (202) 219–4720

between 1 p.m. and 4 p.m. Eastern time,

Monday–Friday.

Comments should be sent to Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs,

Attn: OMB Desk Officer for MSHA,

Office of Management and Budget,

Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503

((202) 395–7316), within 30 days from

the date of this publication in the

Federal Register.

The OMB is particularly interested in

comments which:

• Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

• Evaluate the accuracy of the

agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

• Enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

• Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g., permitting electronic submission of

responses.

Agency: Mine Safety and Health

Administration.

Title: Main Fan Operation and

Inspection.

OMB Number: 1219–0030

(reinstatement).

Frequency: Daily.

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit-profit.

Number of Respondents: 7.

Estimated Time Per Respondent: 30

minutes.

Total Burden Hours: 1,313.

Total Annualized capital/startup

costs: $735.

Total annual costs (operating/

maintaining systems or purchasing

services): $735.

Description: Requires operators of

metal and nonmetal underground mines

that are categorized as gassy, to have

main fans with pressure-recording

systems. Main fans are to be inspected

daily, certification of the inspection

made, and records kept of the results of

the inspections.

Theresa M. O’Malley,

Departmental Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 97–25239 Filed 9–22–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–43–M

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

Agency Information Collection

Activities: Proposed Collection;

Comment Request

AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC).

ACTION: Notice of OMB review of

information collection and solicitation

of public comment.

SUMMARY: The NRC has recently

submitted to OMB for review the

following proposal for the collection of

information under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44

U.S.C. Chapter 35). The NRC hereby

informs potential respondents that an

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and

that a person is not required to respond

to, a collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid OMB control

number.

1. Type of submission, new, revision,

or extension: Revision.

2. The title of the information

collection: NRC Form 790,

‘‘Classification Record’’.

3. The form number if applicable:

NRC Form 790.

4. How often the collection is

required: On occasion.

5. Who will be required or asked to

report: NRC employees, NRC

contractors, NRC licensees, and

certificate holders who classify and

declassify NRC information.

6. An estimate of the number of

responses: 2,200.

7. The estimated number of annual

respondents: 175.

8. An estimate of the total number of

hours needed annually to complete the

requirement or request: 147.

9. Abstract: The NRC Form 790 is

being revised to add three additional

fields and revise several existing fields

for easier completion. In addition, an

electronic reporting format is being

made available for those wishing to use

it. Completion of the NRC Form 790 is

a mandatory requirement for licensees,

contractors, and certificate holders who

classify and declassify NRC information

in accordance with Executive Order

12958, ‘‘Classified National Security

Information,’’ the Atomic Energy Act,

and implementing directives.

A copy of the submittal may be

viewed free of charge at the NRC Public

Document Room, 2120 L Street NW,

(lower level), Washington, DC. Members

of the public who are in the

Washington, DC, area can access this

document via modem on the Public

Document Room Bulletin Board (NRC’s

Advanced Copy Document Library),

NRC subsystem at FedWorld, 703–321–

3339. Members of the public who are

located outside of the Washington, DC,

area can dial FedWorld, 1–800–303–

9672, or use the FedWorld Internet

address: fedworld.gov (Telnet). The

document will be available on the

bulletin board for 30 days after the

signature date of this notice. If
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 184 / Tuesday, September 23, 1997 / Notices 49709

assistance is needed in accessing the

document, please contact the FedWorld

help desk at 703–487–4608. Additional

assistance in locating the document is

available from the NRC Public

Document Room, nationally at 1–800–

397–4209, or within the Washington,

DC, area at 202–634–3273.

Comments and questions should be

directed to the OMB reviewer by

October 24, 1997: Norma Gonzales,

Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs (3150–0052), NEOB–10202,

Office of Management and Budget,

Washington, DC 20503.

Comments can also be submitted by

telephone at (202) 395–3084.

The NRC Clearance Officer is Brenda

Jo Shelton, (301) 415–7233.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day

of September 1997.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Arnold E. Levin,

Acting Designated Senior, Official for

Information Resources Management.

[FR Doc. 97–25211 Filed 9–22–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket No. 030–30691–CivP; ASLBP No.

97–730–02–CivP]

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board;

Notice of Hearing

September 17, 1997.

In the matter of Barnett Industrial X-ray,

Inc. (Stillwater, Oklahoma).

Notice is hereby given that, by

Memorandum and Order dated

September 8, 1997, the Atomic Safety

and Licensing Board has granted the

request of Barnett Industrial X-Ray, Inc.

for a hearing in the captioned

proceeding. The hearing concerns the

Order Imposing a Civil Monetary

Penalty, issued by the NRC Staff on May

23, 1997 and published in the Federal

Register at 62 FR 30347 (1997). The

parties to the proceeding are the

Licensee and the NRC Staff.

The issues to be considered at the

hearing are: (1) Whether the violations

represent a security Level 2 matter in

accordance with the ‘‘General Statement

of Policy and Procedures for NRC

Enforcement Actions,’’ NUREG–1600

(July 1995); and, (2) whether a $4,000.00

civil penalty is warranted in light of the

mitigating actions taken by the Licensee.

Materials concerning this proceeding

are on file at the Commission’s Public

Document Room, 2120 L St. N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20555, and at the

Commission’s Region IV Office, Harris

Tower, 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400,

Arlington, TX 76011–8064.

During the course of this proceeding,

the Licensing Board, as necessary, may

conduct one or more prehearing

conferences. The time and place of these

sessions, which will be open to the

public, will be announced in later

Licensing Board Orders. The evidentiary

hearing will be held in Stillwater,

Oklahoma on November 5, 1997, at

10:00 a.m. in the Payne County

Courthouse, 606 S. Husband Street.

Issued at Rockville, Maryland, September

17, 1997.

For the Atomic Safety and Licensing

Board.

B. Paul Cotter, Jr.,

Chairman, Administrative Judge.

[FR Doc. 97–25221 Filed 9–22–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

[Docket 70–7001]

Notice of Amendment to Certificate of

Compliance GDP–1 for the U.S.

Enrichment Corporation, Paducah

Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Paducah,

Kentucky

The Director, Office of Nuclear

Material Safety and Safeguards, has

made a determination that the following

amendment request is not significant in

accordance with 10 CFR 76.45. In

making that determination the staff

concluded that: (1) there is no change in

the types or significant increase in the

amounts of any effluents that may be

released offsite; (2) there is no

significant increase in individual or

cumulative occupational radiation

exposure; (3) there is no significant

construction impact; (4) there is no

significant increase in the potential for,

or radiological or chemical

consequences from, previously analyzed

accidents; (5) the proposed changes do

not result in the possibility of a new or

different kind of accident; (6) there is no

significant reduction in any margin of

safety; and (7) the proposed changes

will not result in an overall decrease in

the effectiveness of the plant’s safety,

safeguards or security programs. The

basis for this determination for the

amendment request is shown below.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission

staff has reviewed the certificate

amendment application and concluded

that it provides reasonable assurance of

adequate safety, safeguards, and

security, and compliance with NRC

requirements. Therefore, the Director,

Office of Nuclear Material Safety and

Safeguards, is prepared to issue an

amendment to the Certificate of

Compliance for the Paducah Gaseous

Diffusion Plant. The staff has prepared

a Compliance Evaluation Report which

provides details of the staff’s evaluation.

The NRC staff has determined that

this amendment satisfies the criteria for

a categorical exclusion in accordance

with 10 CFR 51.22. Therefore, pursuant

to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental

impact statement or environmental

assessment need be prepared for this

amendment.

U.S. Enrichment Corporation (USEC)

or any person whose interest may be

affected may file a petition, not

exceeding 30 pages, requesting review

of the Director’s Decision. The petition

must be filed with the Commission not

later than 15 days after publication of

this Federal Register Notice. A petition

for review of the Director’s Decision

shall set forth with particularity the

interest of the petitioner and how that

interest may be affected by the results of

the decision. The petition should

specifically explain the reasons why

review of the Decision should be

permitted with particular reference to

the following factors: (1) the interest of

the petitioner; (2) how that interest may

be affected by the Decision, including

the reasons why the petitioner should

be permitted a review of the Decision;

and (3) the petitioner’s areas of concern

about the activity that is the subject

matter of the Decision. Any person

described in this paragraph (USEC or

any person who filed a petition) may

file a response to any petition for

review, not to exceed 30 pages, within

10 days after filing of the petition. If no

petition is received within the

designated 15-day period, the Director

will issue the final amendment to the

Certificate of Compliance without

further delay. If a petition for review is

received, the decision on the

amendment application will become

final in 60 days, unless the Commission

grants the petition for review or

otherwise acts within 60 days after

publication of this Federal Register

Notice.

A petition for review must be filed

with the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, Washington,

DC 20555–0001, Attention: Rulemakings

and Adjudications Staff, or may be

delivered to the Commission’s Public

Document Room, the Gelman Building,

2120 L Street, NW, Washington, DC, by

the above date.

For further details with respect to the

action see (1) the application for

amendment and (2) the Commission’s

Compliance Evaluation Report. These

items are available for public inspection