July 2, 2015

Skyscape Aerial Photography 5550 Ky Highway 39 S Crab Orchard, Ky 40149
Cell 606

- 879

- 1710
Email: cbraley@skyscape.photography

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 2059

RE: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of 2012

Attachments:

1. Yuneeq Q500+ (Quick Start Guide)

2. Yuneeq Q500+ Pilot Training Guide

3. 3DRobotics X8+ Operation Manual

4. 3DRobotics X8+ Preflight Checklist
References:

1. FAA Exemption No. 11138, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0481 in the matter of the petition of DOUGLAS TRUDEAU

2. FAA Exemption No. 11136, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2014

– 0508 in the matter of the petition of ADVANCED AVIATION SOLUTIONS LLC

3. FAA Exemption No. 11080 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0355 in the matter of the petition of FLYING CAM INC

Dear Sir or Madam,

In accordance with the FAA’s Guidelines for Submitting a Petition for Exemption under section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 , Skyscape Aerial Photography, referred
to hereafter as the petitioner, requests exemption from the following sections of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations §§61.113(a); 61.113(b); 91.119(c); 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409 (a)(1) ;

91.409(a)(2); 91.417(a) & (b); In order to operate small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS’s) commercially in airspace regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the purposes of aerial photography, cinematography, videography, mapping, crop surveying, inspections and other flight operations that could be performed safely and more cost effectively with the use of small UAS at low altitude within the U.S. national airspace system as compared to a manned aircraft. Operations will be performed o nly at the request of and with the authorization and permission of clients or their authorized agents in order to facilitate commerce and raise awareness of the beneficial uses of small unmanned air systems. So long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333. The conditions identified and proposed by the petitioner are drawn from
references 1

- 3.

The Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) The petitioner seeks exemption from the above mentioned FARs for the following reasons;

Section 91.119(c) As referenced in Exemption 11138 (DOUGLAS TRUDEAU), operations conducted closer than 500 feet to the ground may require that the UA be operated clo ser than 500 feet to essential persons, or objects that would not be possible without additional relief. The petitioner requests waiver for this condition to allow reasonable and responsible operations in areas of subdivisions and neighborhoods if required

.

Section 91.121 As referenced in Exemption 11138 (DOUGLAS TRUDEAU) is inapplicable since the UAS does not
have an altimeter and instead utilizes electronic GPS with a barometric sensor for altitude
information.

Section 91.151(a)
As referenced in Exe mption 11136 (ADVANCED AVIATION SOLUTIONS LLC) prior relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the prescribed minimums, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. In addition, similar UAS

- specific relief has been granted
in E xemption numbers 8811, 10808, and 10673 for daytime, VFR conditions. The UAS provides battery power remaining in percent to the PIC. The UA batteries provide approximately 20 minutes of powered flight. Information provided in the operating documents discus ses procedures regarding remaining battery power management. Those documents contain a condition in which the PIC will initiate a landing procedure when battery remaining reaches a specified level. Given the limitations on proposed operations and the locat ion of those proposed operations, the FAA found that a reduced minimum power reserve for flight in daytime VFR conditions was reasonable.Section 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2); 91.417(a); 91.417(b)

As referenced in Exemption 11138 (DOUGLAS TRUDEAU), the petitioner proposes to inspect and ensure that the UAS is in a condition for safe flight in accordance with the operating documents. The FAA found that adherence to the petitioner’s operating document s and the conditions and limitations specified, describing the requirements for maintenance, inspection, and record keeping, were sufficient to ensure that safety would not be adversely affected.

UAS’s; Yuneeq Q500+ or 3DRobotics X8+ The requested e xemption would permit commercial operation of Skyscape Aerial Photography’s UAS's, which weigh between 5 and 15 lbs. and perform precision services that consist of high quality still photographs and videography taken by onboard cameras. UAS’s for aerial se rvices reduce the need to utilize conventional manned aircrafts for the same purpose at a fraction of the cost; additionally, UAS’s services can provide an increase in efficiency and productivity for the affected activities and a decrease
in fuel emissions providing environmental benefits. Operations under the exemption will be subject to strict operating requirements and conditions to ensure, at minimum, an equivalent level of safety to currently authorized operations using manned aircraft and under condit ions as may be modified by the FAA as required by Section 333.

The UAS's will be operated under controlled conditions at low altitude in airspace that is limited in scope, as described herein; it will have automated control features, as described in the a ttached manuals. The UAS’s also will be operated by an individual who possesses an FAA Private Pilot Certificate
and /or valid US Driver’s License. Finally, the airspace in which the UAS will operate will be Class G airspace or airspace approved by the FAA in advance.

Approval of these exemptions would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities under Section 333(c) of the Reform Act to “establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.”

The petitioner has reviewed FAA exemptions references 1

- 3 Conditions and Limitations section and agrees that the procedures specified therein are reasonable and will be utilized in order to manage and m itigate risk and ensure public safety. A preflight checklist will be developed and employed to ensure that the UAS’s airworthiness will be verified prior to each launch.

The petitioner request that in a manner similar as described in reference 3, he be a llowed to operate within 5 miles of an airport provided that:

“ The UA may not operate in Class B, C, or D airspace without written approval from the FAA. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of the geographic center of a non

- towered airport
as d enoted on a current FAA

- published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA. The letter of agreement with the airp ort management must be made available to the Administrator upon request .” Operations within 5 miles of an airport are not anticipated to be routine but the petitioner is requesting a mechanism to facilitate such activities without requesting a new and sep arateexemption(s) should the need arise. Operations within class B airspace are not requested due

to the lack of mode C transponder.

Public interest Use of the UAS’s in lieu of a manned aircraft would enhance safety and reduce the environmental impact a s compared to similar operations conducted with manned aircrafts. Additionally, use of the UAS’s in order to facilitate commerce could lead to economic growth. Operations for this petition will enable service for property owners or their designees seeking an enhanced perspective for characteristics, amenities, and benefits of their desired photographic subjects that cannot be displayed through ground level photography or videography. The petitioner will provide clients with photographic data for these purp oses on a ‘for hire’ basis acting as an independent contractor; a visual observer will be utilized. The petitioner also hopes to provide training to those interested in turning the operation of UAS from a hobby into a career so that they me do so in safe a nd professional fashion. Liability insurance will be obtained commensurate with the granting of this request for exemption. Data may be submitted to FAA by traditional means, e.g. COA Monthly Reports, or other means as required or requested.

Conclusion

T he petitioner is requesting this exemption for the purposes of “aerial photography, cinematography, videography, mapping, crop surveying, inspections and other flight operations”. The petitioner's business model is of the idea of offering ad hoc small UAS’ s services to individuals or business entities who wish to employ these services as a safe, effective, and legal option to enhance their business or hobby, as well as help transition hobbyist along a safe and sane educational track into a full time profess ional UAS career.

Currently, many other UAS operators are conducting business in exactly as described above without FAA authorization. The petitioner has refrained from engaging in commercial use of the UAS’s. The primary purpose of seeking this exemption is to obtain the capability to offer those services while remaining in compliance.

Skyscape Aerial Photography

Christopher D Braley