alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### C. H. CHICHESTER, Jr. v. The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BIRMINGHAM et al.

77-398.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

May 26, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1978.

John H. Lavette and L. Don Campbell, Jr., Birmingham, for appellant.

W. Gerald Stone, of Stone, Patton & Kierce, Bessemer, for appellees, The First National Bank of Birmingham and Elizabeth S. Hudson, as Co-Trustees of the Estate of Dan R. Hudson, deceased.

Frank M. Bainbridge and William O’Neal Whitt, Jr., of Bainbridge & Mims, Birmingham, for appellee, Julian I. Boriss.

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard orally before the Court on appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal under Rules 2 and 38 A.R.A.P., and after hearing the parties and carefully considering their contentions, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted for the reasons that hereinafter appear.

The Court of Civil Appeals in the first appeal in this case, *The First Nat. Bank of Birmingham et al. v. Chichester,*352 So.2d 1371 (Ala.Civ.App.1977) held:

> “It is the opinion of the court that the legal evidence presented was insufficient to support a verdict upon any of the theories presented by plaintiff and *the motion for directed verdict should have been granted. Dillon v. Nix,*55 Ala.App. 611, 318 So.2d 308 (1975).” [Emphasis ours.]

Whereupon, the cause was reversed and remanded. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals was sought in this Court and the writ denied on December *28522, 1977. See 352 So.2d 1376 (Ala.1977). After remand, appellees filed a motion in the trial court for summary judgment based upon the prior pleadings, the legal evidence and exhibits in the prior trial, and the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals. The appellant filed no countervailing affidavits. The appellees’ motion for summary judgment was granted by the trial court based upon the pleadings, exhibits, and “legal evidence” in the first trial. Appellant then appealed to this Court from the order granting summary judgment. Since the Court of Civil Appeals held, on the first appeal, that the motion for directed verdict should have been granted, and no new evidence at all was submitted by affidavit of the appellant in the trial court, after re-mandment, the trial court was correct in granting summary judgment. Therefore, if there is any room for operation of Rules 2 and 38, A.R.A.P., this case would clearly seem to fall within the rules. The motion to dismiss is due to be granted. No damages are awarded. Only “single costs” are to be taxed.

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL GRANTED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32


           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report of Sierra Resource
Group,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005,
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Sandra J. Andre,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company,  and I, Paul W. Andre,  Treasurer  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  hereby  certifies for the purpose of complying  with Rule 13a-14(b) or
Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange  Act") and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: June 30, 2005                      By: /s/ SANDRA J. ANDRE
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Sandra J. Andre
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: June 30, 2005                      By: /s/ PAUL W. ANDRE
                                          ______________________________________
                                          Paul W. Andre
                                          Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer



A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE  ELECTRONIC  VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN  STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SIERRA RESOURCE  GROUP,  INC., AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY SIERRA RESOURCE GROUP, INC., AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
256 La. 73

#### Dr. Marvin CAVALLINO and Vincent Cavallino v. John CAVALLINO.

No. 50515.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 25, 1970.

In re: John Cavallino applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 231 So.2d 623.

Not considered. Filed too late.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           Subsidiaries of the Company

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                       State of
Name of Subsidiary                                     Incorporation
------------------                                     -------------
<S>                                                    <C>
Source-Yeager Industries, Inc.                         Delaware
Source-US Marketing Services, Inc.                     Delaware
Brand Manufacturing Corporation                        New York
TCE Corporation                                        Delaware
Vail Companies, Inc.                                   Delaware
Source-MYCO, Inc.                                      Delaware
Source-Chestnut Display Systems, Inc.                  Delaware
Source-Canada Corp.                                    Canada
Source Interlink Canada Inc.                           Canada
Source-Huck Store Fixture Company                      Delaware
Huck Store Fixture Company of North Carolina           North Carolina
The Interlink Companies                                Delaware
David E. Young, Inc.                                   New York
International Periodical Distribution, Inc.            Nevada
Universal Circulation Services, Inc.                   California
</Table>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                                     EXPERTS


The following disclosures are included herein for the specific purpose of being
incorporated by reference into the following registration statements (the
"Registration Statements"): Forms S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-05927,
333-22201,333-31858, 333-65472, 333-86432, 333-99161, 333-108759 and 333-115511)
and S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-75957, 333-90933, 333-49194 and 333-99163).


"The financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and for each of the
two years in the period ended December 31, 2003 incorporated in the Registration
Statement by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Med-Design
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004 have been so included in
reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in
auditing and accounting."
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**Herborium
      Group, Inc.**


**Certification
      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Herborium Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Agnes Olszewski,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.




A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
          to
          the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
          and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 *Date:
        October 13, 2006*
  */s/Agnes
        Olszewski*
 *------------------------------*
 *Agnes
        Olszewski*
 *Chief
        Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and*
 *Chief
        Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)*





20
Common social media tools and online classifieds target victims of Human Trafficking
 
  By Security and Emergency Services, DLA Installation Operations at Richmond
  January is National Slavery and Human Trafficking Prevention Month. The month is intended to bring awareness and aide in the prevention and detection of forced labor and prostitution.  In previous years focus has been on increased awareness, techniques for identifying and locating individuals and methods being used to exploit victims. The global campaign expands this year with a focus on prosecution and holding individuals accountable for these horrible human rights acts, said Guy Simmons, security specialist, Security and Emergency Services, Defense Logistics Agency Installation Operations at Richmond, Virginia. He said at Defense Supply Center Richmond, his goal is to bring awareness to employees who may encounter or have the ability to prevent trafficking. Simmons encourages DLA employees, family and friends to be proactive and aware of the methods and risks associated with social media and internet usage as it potentially applies to Combatting Trafficking in Persons. Human traffickers are using social media/networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Instagram, dating sites and Craigslist at an alarming rate to work methodically gaining trust or offering promising futures and wealth to lure unsuspecting victims into an underground world of crime that includes forced labor and prostitution. To expand on DLA general awareness articles and DLA annual CTIP awareness training, Simmons says the State Department authors a valuable document published annually that provides insight to trafficking:Annual Trafficking In Person Report (June 2017). The report outlines success stories, special interest/focus areas, methodology and statistics/reports surrounding trafficking in the global community. DLA employees can seek help for a victim or report potential human trafficking activities they become involved in or aware of through the avenues below. ·In case of an emergency, always call 911. ·The National Human Trafficking Resource Center has a national, toll-free hotline, 1-888-373-7888, available to answer calls from anywhere in the country, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, every day of the year. To learn more and increase awareness, individuals can seek additional information and resources through theDepartment of Defense CTIP Website.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129934 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129934 

 COA: 264975 

Kent CC: 98-008624-FH 

JAMES EMMANUEL BEARDSLEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 6, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Houlihan (Docket No. 

128340). 

d0524 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 31, 2006 

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24975]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Research and Special Programs Administration


International Standards on the Transport of Dangerous Goods by 
Air; Public Meeting

AGENCY: Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA), Department 
of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is to advise persons that RSPA will conduct a 
public meeting to exchange views on proposals submitted to the 
sixteenth session of the International Civil Aviation Organization's 
(ICAO) Dangerous Goods Panel (DGP) to be held in Montreal, Canada on 
October 20-31, 1997.

DATES: October 16, 1997 at 9:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Department of Transportation, Nassif Building, Room 8406A, 
400 Seventh Street S.W., Washington, DC 20590-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frits Wybenga, (202) 366-0656, 
International Standards Coordinator for Hazardous Materials Safety, 
RSPA, Department of Transportation, Washington, DC 20590-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting will be held in preparation for 
the sixteenth session of the ICAO Dangerous Goods Panel Working Group. 
The primary purpose of the Panel meeting will be to discuss proposed 
amendments to the ICAO Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of 
Dangerous Goods by Air (the Technical Instructions). The Panel will 
consider possible amendments to resolve problems encountered with the 
use of the Technical Instructions, and amendments to the Technical 
Instructions on the basis of revisions to the United Nations 
Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (UN 
Recommendations).
    The public is invited to attend without prior notification.

Documents

    Documents submitted to the ICAO Dangerous Goods Panel may be 
reviewed between the hours of 8:30 and 5:00 in RSPA's Dockets Unit 
located in room 8419 of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20590, telephone (202) 366-5046. Copies of documents may 
also be ordered by contacting RSPA's Dockets Unit.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 16, 1997.
Alan I. Roberts,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety.
[FR Doc. 97-24975 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                        2,118
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   339
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              2,457
<PP&E>                                           40
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               18,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           596
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         69
<OTHER-SE>                                   11,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 18,425
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
<CGS>                                           539
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (483)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (150)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (333)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  196
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (197)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.03)

        

</TABLE>
256 La. 251

#### Jacob L. KARNO v. LOUISIANA TAX COMMISSION and Lawrence A. Chehardy, Assessor.

No. 50570.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Jacob L. Karno applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 233 So.2d 592.

Writ refused. We find no error of law in the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
#### BANK OF LOUISIANA v. James F. NASH, Sr. a/k/a J. F. Nash, Sr.

No. 9213.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

June 13, 1978.

David D. Duggins, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

Frank S. Bruno, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Before SCHOTT, BEER and GARSAUD, JJ.

GARSAUD, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the trial court which held that certain machinist’s tools belonging to defendant-appellant were not exempt from seizure as tools of his trade pursuant to R.S. 13:3881(2). The trial court was of the opinion that defendant had retired from the machinist’s trade and that the tools were not used to earn a livelihood.

Plaintiff had sued defendant originally for $1,359.15, the major portion of which represented an amount owed on defendant’s Mastercharge credit card account. A default judgment was entered against defendant and a writ of fieri facias was issued to have defendant’s assets seized to satisfy the judgment. After the seizure, on a rule to show cause, defendant’s claim that the seized tools were tools of his machinist’s trade was denied. This appeal followed.

The record is noticeably devoid of evidence addressed to this point. What evidence there is, however, does support the trial court’s finding.

Defendant Nash, now over 62 years of age, last worked as a machinist in August of 1975. He maintains that as a result of illness, he has been unable to pursue his occupation as a machinist. Over the last three years, he has earned about fifteen dollars *in toto*on two small jobs using his tools and has received storage space rent-free from his landlord by doing odd jobs for him. The use of the storage space is worth *260about five dollars a month. His major sources of income are a military disability payment and Social Security benefits, which together amount to between five hundred and six hundred dollars a month.

Although it is well settled that temporary non-use of tools creates no presumption against the owner, *Skelley v. Accounts Supervision Co.,*53 So.2d 520 (La.App.2d Cir. 1951), and *Lafourche Ice & Shrimp Co. v. Gilbeau,*185 So. 310 (La.App.1st Cir. 1938), nevertheless in this case the principle is simply not applicable because, other than defendant’s own articulated hope, the evidence does not support any reasonable inference that the tools will be used again in the machinist trade. This is the conclusion of the trial court and we find no manifest error in his finding. Accordingly, we affirm. *Canter v. Koehring Co.,*283 So.2d 716 (La.1973).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24666]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[NAFTA--01877]


Milaca Mills, Incorporated, Milaca, MN; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Title V of the North American Free Trade Agreement 
Implementation Act (Pub. L. 103-182) concerning transitional adjustment 
assistance, hereinafter called (NAFTA-TAA), and in accordance with 
Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II, of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273), an investigation was initiated on 
August 18, 1997 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at 
Milaca Mills, Incorporated, Milaca, MN.
    This case is being terminated because the workers were separated 
from the subject firm more than one year prior to the date of the 
petition. The NAFTA Implementation Act specifies that no certification 
may apply to any worker whose last separation occurred more than one 
year before the date of the petition. Consequently further 
investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 28th day of August 1997.
Grant D. Beale,
Acting Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-24666 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M