alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-3716

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Nebraska. * Alonzo Wright, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 14, 2002 Filed: May 20, 2002

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Alonzo Wright was convicted of robbing an Omaha, Nebraska credit union. Wright appeals the district court’s * denial of his motion for acquittal, contending the evidence was insufficient to identify him as the robber. We review the sufficiency of evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict. United States v. L.B.G. , 131 F.3d 1276, 1277 (8 th Cir. 1997). The bank teller from whom the robber demanded money testified in court that Wright was the robber. The teller’s uncorroborated-2- testimony alone is a sufficient basis for conviction. Id. at 1278. Further, the conviction is supported by numerous pieces of circumstantial evidence. We thus affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 183 (Monday, September 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-25109]



[[Page 49569]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part III





Department of Transportation





_______________________________________________________________________



Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed During the Week Ending September 
12, 1997; Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ending September 12, 1997; Notices

Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 183 / Monday, September 22, 1997 / 
Notices

[[Page 49570]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed During the Week Ending 
September 12, 1997

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.
    Docket Number: OST-97-2889.
    Date Filed: September 10, 1997.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: COMP Telex Mail Vote 889; Reduce fares from India; 
Intended effective date: October 1, 1997.
Paulette V. Twine,
Documentary Services.
[FR Doc. 97-25109 Filed 9-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
#### ALLIED LUMBER CO., INC., et al., Appellants, v. U.S. FIDELITY & GUARANTEE COMPANY and the Home Insurance Co., Appellees.

No. 76-2171.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 20, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 19, 1978.

Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann & Jennings and R. Owen Ricker, Jr., Miami, for appellants.

Knight, Peters, Hoeveler, Pickle, Niem-oeller & Flynn, Jeanne Heyward, Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl and James E. Tribble, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Spreen,*343 So.2d 649 (Fla.3d DCA 1977).
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 63827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24894]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0489; FRL-9364-2]

Cancellation of Pesticides for Non-Payment of Year 2012 
Registration Maintenance Fees; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of July 27, 2012, 
concerning the cancellation of pesticides for non-payment of year 2012 
registration maintenance fees. This document is being issued to correct 
Table 1 and Table 2 of the cancellation notice by removing six entries 
which were inadvertently included.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Yanchulis, Information 
Technology and Resources Management Division (7502P), Office of 
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 347-0237; 
email address: yanchulis.michael@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    The Agency included in the July 27, 2012, notice a list of those 
who may be potentially affected by this action. If you have questions 
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, 
consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    EPA has established a docket for this action under docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0489. Publicly available 
docket materials are available either in the electronic docket at 
http://www.regulations.gov.

II. What does this correction do?

    This notice is being issued to correct Table 1 and Table 2 of the 
cancellation notice. This correction removes six entries which were 
inadvertently included.
    FR Doc. 2012-18375 published in the Federal Register of July 27, 
2012 (77 FR 44229) (FRL-9355-7) is corrected as follows:
    1. On page 44230, in Table 1, remove the complete entry for: ``TX-
11-0003.''
    2. On page 44230, in Table 2, remove the complete entry for: 
``51032-00014.''
    3. On page 44231, in Table 2, remove the complete entry for: 
``72468-00003,'' ``72468-00005,'' ``82744-00001,'' and ``82744-00002.''

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: September 25, 2012.
Michael Hardy,
Acting Director, Information Technology and Resource Management 
Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2012-24894 Filed 10-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted  from  the
Company's unaudited statements of operations, balance sheets and statements of
cash flows and is qualified by reference to such financial statements contained
within the Company's  Form  10-QSB  for  the  period  ended  June 30,  1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0001077038
<NAME>     Wellspring Investments, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                        2936
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              2936
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         1040
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      1
<COMMON>                                       100
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2936
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (26632)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (26632)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0




</TABLE>
#### Cyril S. GLAUM, Appellant, v. Marilyn F. GLAUM, Appellee.

No. 68-579.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

June 11, 1969.

Rehearing Denied July 28, 1969.

*391Edward A. Perse, of Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Selwood, Miami, and Oliver L. Green, Jr., Lakeland, for appellant.

C. John Coniglio, Wildwood, for ap-pellee.

LILES, Chief Judge.

Marilyn F. Glaum was divorced from Cyril S. Glaum in Sumter County, Florida, on January 12, 1968. Subsequent to the entry of the final decree, the defendant, Cyril S. Glaum, filed a motion to set it aside. This motion was heard by the trial judge, and was denied on April 2, 1968. Thereafter, defendant filed a motion for rehearing of the order denying the motion to set aside the final decree, and this motion for rehearing was denied October 14, 1968. This order is here for review on interlocutory appeal.

Plaintiff and defendant were residents of Dade County, Florida, but by way of mutual agreement the divorce was started and concluded in Sumter County, Florida.

Defendant attempted to have his decree set aside alleging fraud. He testified that during the time the divorce was pending and prior to the entry of the final decree the plaintiff and defendant were constantly in touch with each other and that they had cohabited as husband and wife prior to the entry of the final decree. He stated that they had reconciled after the filing of the complaint for divorce and that plaintiff had told him the suit had been dismissed.

At the hearing to set aside the final decree the plaintiff denied that she had ever cohabited with the defendant since the filing of the complaint. She testified that it was true that defendant had harrassed her and was constantly telephoning her begging her to see him, and that she did on several occasions due to these harassments allow him to take her to dinner. She stated that she even allowed him to live in her house for a short period of time prior to the entry of the final decree, but she categorically denied that there had been cohabitation between the parties. She also denied cohabiting with him at anytime within several months prior to filing for divorce, and insisted no reconciliation had been attained.

At the hearing on the motion to set aside the final decree, defendant testified that he had lived with her as husband and wife in motels on a trip to Las Vagas prior to the filing of suit, and in Orlando and in their home subsequent to its filing. This was the only testimony adduced at the hearing and, as is readily apparent, there was a conflict.

The trial judge being the trier of fact had to reconcile these conflicts and he did so in favor of the plaintiff. We can find nowhere that he abused his discretion, and, for that reason, we affirm.

MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
122 STAT. 3938 PUBLIC LAW 110–345—OCT. 7, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1199 (S. 1210): 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110–341, Pt. 1 (Comm. on the Judiciary). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 153 (2007): Sept. 24, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 154 (2008): Sept. 24, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–345 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To extend the grant program for drug-endangered children. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drug Endangered Children 

Act of 2007’’. 

SEC. 2. DRUG-ENDANGERED CHILDREN GRANT PROGRAM EXTENDED. 

Section 755(c) of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and 

Reauthorization Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 3797cc–2(c)) is amended 

by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2006 and 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 

2008 and 2009’’. 

Approved October 7, 2008. 

42 USC 3711 

note. 

Drug 

Endangered 

Children 

Act of 2007. 

Oct. 7, 2008 

[H.R. 1199] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2529]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

January 27 , 1997.
    The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) has submitted the following 
public information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. 
Copies of the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the OTS 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
OTS Clearance Officer, Office of Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20552.

Dates: Written comments should be received on or before March 5, 1997 
to be assured of consideration.
    OMB Number: 1550-0061.
    Form Number: Not Applicable.
    Type of Review: Extension of an approved collection.
    Title: Outside Borrowings.
    Description: This information is collected from savings 
associations that do not meet capital requirements. These institutions 
must give ten days prior notification before making long-term 
borrowings. This information is used to monitor the safety and 
soundness of institutions that do not meet their capital requirements.
    Respondents: Savings and Loan Associations and Savings Banks.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 4 hours.
    Frequency of Response: 1.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 4 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Colleen M. Devine, (202) 906-6025, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20552.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of Management 
and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 
20503.
Catherine C.M. Teti,
Director, Records Management and Information Policy.
[FR Doc. 97-2529 Filed 1-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24722]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting

Public Announcement
Pursuant To The Government In the Sunshine Act
(Public Law 94-409) [5 U.S.C. Section 552b]
AGENCY HOLDING MEETING: Department of Justice, United States Parole 
Commission.

DATE AND TIME: 9:30 a.m., Thursday, September 18, 1997.

PLACE: 5550 Friendship Boulevard, Suite 400, Chevy Chase, Maryland 
20815.

STATUS: Closed--Meeting.

MATTERS CONSIDERED: The following matter will be considered during the 
closed portion of the Commission's Business Meeting:
    (1) Appeal to the Commission involving approximately four cases 
decided by the National Commissioners pursuant to a reference under 28 
C.F.R. 2.27. These cases were originally heard by an examiner panel 
wherein inmates of Federal prisons have applied for parole or are 
contesting revocation of parole or mandatory release.
    (2) One case involving consideration of a request for exemption 
under 29 U.S.C. Sec. 504.

AGENCY CONTACT: Tom Kowalski, Case Operations, United States Parole 
Commission, (301) 492-5962.

    Dated: September 11, 1997.
Michael A. Stover,
General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-24722 Filed 9-2-97; 2:35 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
<PAGE>
                                                                Exhibit 4.1

                            SEE LEGENDS ON REVERSE

                    Incorporated Under the Laws of the State
                        of Delaware on December 18, 1987

              NUMBER                                       SHARES

                      NAVIGATION TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION


This Certifies that _______________________________ is the registered holder
of ______________________________ Shares of the Common Stock of Navigation
Technologies Corporation transferable only on the books of the Corporation by
the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate
properly endorsed.

     In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto
affixed this ____________________ day of _______________ A.D. ____


         _____________________                    ____________________
              Secretary                                 President
<PAGE>
THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR
ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS. THEY MAY NOT BE SOLD OR OFFERED FOR SALE IN THE
ABSENCE OF AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT AS TO THE SECURITIES UNDER SAID
ACT AND ANY APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAW OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL REASONABLY
SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED.

For Value Received, _____ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
____________________________________________________________ Shares represented
by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
_______________________________ Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the
books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the
premises.

     Dated _____________________    _____

          In presence of

_________________________          __________________________


NOTICE. THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS
WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT
ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GRADY DICKEY, : Civil Action No. 4:14-CV-1096

:

Plaintiff, : (Judge Brann)

:

v. : (Magistrate Judge Carlson)

:

CHAD ISHLER, PAROLE AGENT, :

:

:

 Defendant. :

ORDER

April 13, 2015

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the thorough report and

recommendation of the chief magistrate judge, which is adopted in full. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1.

1. The March 9, 2015 report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge

Martin C. Carlson is ADOPTED. ECF No. 14. 

2. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the case file. 

BY THE COURT: 

s/ Matthew W. Brann 

Matthew W. Brann

 United States District Judge

1

Case 4:14-cv-01096-MWB Document 16 Filed 04/13/15 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7780

FLOYD JUNIOR POWELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LIEUTENANT TONY A. KELLER; JORGE SOSA; JASON COY REID; TIMOTHY

JAMES BREWER; LARRY WATERS; WILLIAM A. BRAFFORD; GRETCHEN C. F.

SHAPPERT; JUDGE RICHARD L. VOORHEES; MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARL HORN;

GREGORY A. FOREST; JAYME MILLER; UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE;

CATAWBA COUNTY; SHERIFF OF CATAWBA COUNTY; CATAWBA COUNTY

SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; COLDWELL BANKER; BOYD HASSELL INDUSTRIAL

COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES; ELVALORIE MATTHEWS; RICHARD MCDONNELL;

MARK T. CALLOWAY; NEWTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; CONOVER POLICE

DEPARTMENT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,

Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00121-GCM)

Submitted: April 3, 2008 Decided: April 22, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

Floyd Junior Powell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Floyd Junior Powell appeals the district court’s order

dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000) his complaint filed

pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and

find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Powell

v. Keller, No. 5:07-cv-00121-GCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Holdings Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.





Very truly yours,





|                                            | 
|------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Dempsey Mork                            | 
|Dempsey Mork                                | 
|Chief Executive and Financial Officer       | 
|(Principal Executive and Financial Officer) | 
|                                            | 
|                                            | 
|                                            | 
|Dated: November 9, 2011                    





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Western Lucrative Enterprises, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.