alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                    |   |                                              |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                    |   |                                              |   |
| Date:  August      14, 2009    |   | /s/ Bennet P. Tchaikovsky                    |   |
|                                                    |   | Bennet      P. Tchaikovsky                        |   |
|                                                    |   | Chief      Financial Officer                      |   |
|                                                    |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jerry JACKSON.

No. 61062.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1978.

Barry F. Viosca, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-*552nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.12    
  


 
  First Amendment    
  



        This is the first amendment to the Secured Convertible Promissory Note ("Note") dated August 14, 2000 between RevCare, Inc., formerly known as Cypress Financial
Services, Inc. (collectively "RevCare") and Russ Mohrmann, RBA Rem-Care, Inc. and Insource Medical Solutions, LLC (collectively known as "Holder"), wherein Holder agrees to extend the maturity date
from August 14, 2002 to January 2, 2003. 


        All
other terms and conditions contained in the original Notes remain in full force and effect. 



	RevCare, Inc.	 	Holder
	

 	
 	

 
	Manuel Occiano

CEO	 	Russ Mohrmann

January 10, 2001











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.12


First Amendment
#### JAR CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. W. Wirt CULBERTSON, Tax Assessor of Dade County, Florida et al., Appellees.

No. 70-643.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 9, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 21, 1971.

*145Ward, Ward, Straessley, Hiss & Heath, Miami, for appellant.

Thomas C. Britton, County Atty., and Gary S. Brooks, Asst. *County*Atty., for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant a taxpayer, sought an exemption from the normal rate of assessment on his real property, pursuant to the provisions of F.S.1967, § 193.201, F.S.A., known as the “green belt law”, subsequent to April 1st of the taxing year. Without the taxpayer notifying the County officials by proper return that he desired to receive the benefits of the statute, the property was assessed on the tax rolls of the County in accordance with the applicable principles of assessment, and no contention was made in the trial court that as assessed there was any error in the valuation placed thereon. It was the taxpayer’s position in the trial court and in this court that it was entitled to the benefits of the exemption statute, *notwithstanding its admitted failure to file the return of agricultural use by April 1st of the taxing year.*The trial court entered a summary judgment denying any relief to the taxpayer. We affirm.

The taxpayer sought an exception from the full valuation assessment, which is accorded to those engaged in bona fide agricultural purposes, pursuant to F. S.1967, § 193.201, F.S.A. The burden was on the taxpayer to show entitlement to the special exception exemption [Harper v. England, 124 Fla. 296, 168 So. 403, Green v. Pederson, Fla.1957, 99 So.2d 292; Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks of the United States of America, Miami Lodge No. 948 v. Dade County, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 605; Stiles v. Brown, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 672; 31 Fla.Jur., Taxation, § 144; 23 F.L.P., Taxtion, § 115], Requiring a return containing a notice of intention to claim lands as agricultural in order to claim benefits of Fla.Stat.1967, § 193.201, F.S.A. by April 1st of each year, per Fla.Stat.1967, § 193.12, F.S.A., is not an unreasonable construction of the statutes. And, we hold that in order for a taxpayer to receive a benefit different in kind from other taxpayers it is necessary for him to strictly comply with all conditions which would be necessary to entitle him to the special treatment.

Therefore, the summary judgment here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2
 Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Central Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15(d-5(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   February 15, 2011/s/ Paul S. FeeleyPaul S. FeeleySenior Vice President, Treasurer and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Roderick G. STEVENS, Jr., Appellant, v. Charles BRUCE and Harris Holding Company, a Florida corporation, sometimes known as Sea Horse, Inc., and sometimes known as Sea Horse Restaurant, Inc., Appellees.

No. 69-264.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 11, 1970.

Rehearing Denied April 17, 1970.

Garland M. Budd, Miami, for appellant.

Michael D. Sikes, of Sherouse, Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Okell, Miami, for ap-pellee Bruce.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Goldstein v. Sabella, Fla. 1956, 88 So.2d 910, 58 A.L.R.2d 1418, and Calbeck v. Town of South Pasadena, Florida, Fla.App.1961, 128 So.2d 138.

WALDEN and McCAIN, JJ., and ADAMS, ALTO (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
#### George E. BARTOLD, Appellant, v. Claudia J. BARTOLD, Appellee.

No. 70-225.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

May 11, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stewart F. LaMotte, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Anthony HOWARD.

No. 61091.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1978.

Maurice T. Hattier, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Nick F. Noriea, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Henry LISTER, Mabrin Lister, and Albert A. Miller, Jr. v. STATE of Florida.

No. 39042.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 16, 1970.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 226 So.2d 238.
#### Ismael ROQUE, Appellant, v. Jorge N. PILA and Noelia Pila, Appellees.

No. 69-845.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 28, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2080 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2080

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit physicians 
and other health care practitioners from charging a membership or other 
incidental fee (or requiring purchase of other items or services) as a 
  prerequisite for the provision of an item or service to a medicare 
                              beneficiary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2005

  Mr. Nelson of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit physicians 
and other health care practitioners from charging a membership or other 
incidental fee (or requiring purchase of other items or services) as a 
  prerequisite for the provision of an item or service to a medicare 
                              beneficiary.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Access to Medicare Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF INCIDENTAL FEES AND REQUIRED PURCHASE OF 
              NONCOVERED ITEMS OR SERVICES UNDER MEDICARE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1842 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395u) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(u) Prohibition of Incidental Fees or Requiring Purchase of 
Noncovered Items or Services.--
            ``(1) In general.--A physician, practitioner (as described 
        in subsection (b)(18)(C)), or other individual may not--
                    ``(A) charge a membership fee or any other 
                incidental fee to a medicare beneficiary (as defined in 
                section 1802(b)(5)(A)); or
                    ``(B) require a medicare beneficiary (as so 
                defined) to purchase a noncovered item or service as a 
                prerequisite for the provision of a covered item or 
                service to the beneficiary under this title.
            ``(2) Construction.--Nothing in this subsection shall be 
        construed to apply the prohibition under paragraph (1) to a 
        physician, practitioner, or other individual described in such 
        subsection who does not accept any funds under this title.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to membership fees and other charges made, or purchases of items 
and services required, on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Uradni list C 83I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 083I |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 6412. marec 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 083I

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 6412. marec 2021

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacije |
| | INFORMACIJE DRŽAV ČLANIC |
| 2021/C 83 I/01 | Informacije o zaprtju ribolova, ki jih sporočijo države članice | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

IV   Informacije

INFORMACIJE DRŽAV ČLANIC

2021/C 83 I/01

Informacije o zaprtju ribolova, ki jih sporočijo države članice

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

IV Informacije

INFORMACIJE DRŽAV ČLANIC

| 12.3.2021 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CI 83/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2021

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CI 83/1

---

Informacije o zaprtju ribolova, ki jih sporočijo države članice

(2021/C 83 I/01)

V skladu s členom 35(3) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1224/2009 z dne 20. novembra 2009 o vzpostavitvi nadzornega sistema Unije za zagotavljanje skladnosti s pravili skupne ribiške politike (1) je bila sprejeta odločitev o zaprtju ribolova, kot je določeno v preglednici:

| Datum in čas zaprtja | 24.12.2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Trajanje | 24.12.2020–31.12.2020 |
| Država članica | Portugalska |
| Stalež ali skupina staležev | ALB/AN05N. |
| Vrsta | severni beli tun (Thunnus alalunga) |
| Cona | Atlantski ocean severno od 5° S |
| Vrste ribiških plovil | --- |
| Referenčna številka | 40/TQ123 |

Datum in čas zaprtja

24.12.2020

Trajanje

24.12.2020–31.12.2020

Država članica

Portugalska

Stalež ali skupina staležev

ALB/AN05N.

Vrsta

severni beli tun (Thunnus alalunga)

Cona

Atlantski ocean severno od 5° S

Vrste ribiških plovil

---

Referenčna številka

40/TQ123

---

(1)  UL L 343, 22.12.2009, str. 1.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2146 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2146

   To extend relocation expenses test programs for Federal employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 20, 2005

Ms. Collins (for herself, Mr. Lieberman, and Mr. Akaka) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend relocation expenses test programs for Federal employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RELOCATION EXPENSES TEST PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 5739 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``for a period not to 
        exceed 24 months''; and
            (2) in subsection (e), by striking ``7 years'' and 
        inserting ``11 years''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as though enacted as part of the Travel and Transportation 
Reform Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-264; 112 Stat. 2350).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I,
Lawrence A. Kenyon, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of NeoPharm, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|Dated: March 15, 2004 |  |  | /s/LAWRENCE A. KENYONLawrence A. Kenyon,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|--------------------- |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2071 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify congressional 

intent regarding the counting of residents in a nonhospital setting under 

the medicare program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2005 

Ms. SNOWE (for herself, Mr. BINGAMAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. DORGAN, and Mr. 

ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify 

congressional intent regarding the counting of residents 

in a nonhospital setting under the medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community and Rural 

5 Medical Residency Preservation Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 2071 IS 

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF CONGRESSIONAL INTENT RE2 GARDING THE COUNTING OF RESIDENTS IN A 

3 NONHOSPITAL SETTING. 

4 (a) D–GME.—Section 1886(h)(4)(E) (42 U.S.C. 

5 1395ww(h)(4)(E)) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following new sentences: ‘‘For purposes of the preceding 

7 sentence, the term ‘all, or substantially all, of the costs 

8 for the training program’ means the stipends and benefits 

9 provided to the resident and other amounts, if any, as de10 termined by the hospital and the entity operating the non11 hospital setting. The hospital is not required to pay the 

12 entity any amounts other than those determined by the 

13 hospital and the entity in order for the hospital to be con14 sidered to have incurred all, or substantially all, of the 

15 costs for the training program in that setting.’’. 

16 (b) IME.—Section 1886(d)(5)(B)(iv) (42 U.S.C. 

17 1395ww(d)(5)(B)(iv)) is amended by adding at the end 

18 the following new sentences: ‘‘For purposes of the pre19 ceding sentence, the term ‘all, or substantially all, of the 

20 costs for the training program’ means the stipends and 

21 benefits provided to the resident and other amounts, if 

22 any, as determined by the hospital and the entity oper23 ating the nonhospital setting. The hospital is not required 

24 to pay the entity any amounts other than those deter25 mined by the hospital and the entity in order for the hos-
3 

•S 2071 IS 

1 pital to be considered to have incurred all, or substantially 

2 all, of the costs for the training program in that setting.’’. 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall take effect on January 1, 2005. 

Æ
Case 4:13-cv-01750-MWB-JVW   Document 12   Filed 01/20/15   Page 1 of 7

Case 4:13-cv-01750-MWB-JVW   Document 12   Filed 01/20/15   Page 2 of 7

Case 4:13-cv-01750-MWB-JVW   Document 12   Filed 01/20/15   Page 3 of 7

Case 4:13-cv-01750-MWB-JVW   Document 12   Filed 01/20/15   Page 4 of 7

Case 4:13-cv-01750-MWB-JVW   Document 12   Filed 01/20/15   Page 5 of 7

Case 4:13-cv-01750-MWB-JVW   Document 12   Filed 01/20/15   Page 6 of 7

Case 4:13-cv-01750-MWB-JVW   Document 12   Filed 01/20/15   Page 7 of 7

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2020-12-31T11:33:55-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2146

AN ACT

To extend relocation expenses test programs for Federal

employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2146 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RELOCATION EXPENSES TEST

2 PROGRAMS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5739 of title 5, United

4 States Code, is amended—

5 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘for a pe6 riod not to exceed 24 months’’; and

7 (2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘7 years’’ and

8 inserting ‘‘11 years’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 this section shall take effect as though enacted as part

11 of the Travel and Transportation Reform Act of 1998

12 (Public Law 105–264; 112 Stat. 2350).

Passed the Senate August 1, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2146

AN ACT

To extend relocation expenses test programs for

Federal employees.
U
. S
. Deportment of Transport a tion Federa l Aviation Administration



### JUL 

## 2 8 2015 G.R. Lowe lll CEO Aviation Fab ri cators, ln c. North Fo urth Street, C li nton , MO 64735 D ear G.R.Lowe Ill: Small Airplane Directorate 90 I Locust St., Room 30 I Kansas City , MO 64106

Thi s i s in response to your March 23,2013 lett e r sent to the public docke t (No. FAA

-20 1 5- 0782) petitioning th e Fede ral Av i atio n Administration on b e half of Av iation Fabricators, In c. (AVFAB) for an exemption from§ 23.56 1 (a), (b), and (c) ofT itle 14 , Code of Fe d e ral Re g ulation s ( 1 4 CF R). T he p roposed exemp tion , if g rant ed, would a ll ow A VF AB to in stall PIN 62-0428 s tretche r asse mbl y for a hori zo ntal medi cal pa ssenge r w ithout dynamic seat testi n g on Pilatu s Mod e l PC-12, PC

- 1 2/45, PC

- 12/47 , and P C- 1 2/47E airplan es. We hav e determine d th e exe mption you see k i s not necessary becau se§ 23.562 i s app li cab le to seat and restraint sys tems only. Th e intent of§ 23.562 i s to provide safe gene ra l aviation seats f or a typi cal , seate d occupant without medical conditions. An exemption to 

### § 23.562 i s not required to certify a n occu pant orie nt e d in a berth or litte r orientati on s in ce the established injury crite ri a cannot assess th ese types of positions. B ecau se you s eek re li ef from a require me nt that i s not inte nded by§ 23.562, yo ur propo se d exemption to the rul e is th ere fore not necessary and we will take no furth e r action on yo ur p et iti o n . Sincere l y,



# PtCLSlQ_ E arl Lawre nce Mana ge r , Small A irplan e Directorate Aircraft Ce rtific ation Service

ACE-15- 1 0 1 2-EProj ect No.: ACE-15- 1 0 12 -E Project Officer: Rob ert S teg eman ACE- lll :Tfompki n s:07/27/ 1 5 :D oc#46051 G.R. Lowe lli CEO Aviation Fabricators, In c. North Fourth Street, Clinton, MO 64735

ACE- 1 5 -1 0 1 2-E