alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
28

<PAGE>
                                  Exhibit 23.1



                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
SITEL Corporation:


We consent to the use of our reports incorporated by reference in
the
Registration Statement (No. 333-13403) filed on Form S-3,
Registration Statement
(No. 033-99434) filed on Form S-8, Registration Statement (No.
333-19069) filed
on Form S-8 and Registration Statement (No. 333-30635) filed on
Form S-8 of
SITEL Corporation of our reports dated April 4, 1997 relating to
the
consolidated balance sheets of SITEL Corporation and subsidiaries
as of December
31, 1995 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of
income (loss),
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year
period ended December 31, 1996 and the related schedule, which
reports appear in
the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K/A of SITEL
Corporation.




                                   KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Omaha, Nebraska
November 14, 1997
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements(Numbers 033-99434, 333-19069, 333-30635, 333-44781,and 333-78241) on Form S-8 of SITEL Corporation of our reportsdated March 16, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofSITEL Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, andthe related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, andcash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2004, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2004, and the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, whichreports appear in the December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-Kof SITEL Corporation.

 

Ourreport also indicates that the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142,*Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets*,as of January 1, 2002.

 

 
| /s/  KPMG  LLP |       |   |
|--------------------------|------------|--------|
|                     |       |
| **KPMG LLP**             | ** ** |
| ** **               | ** ** |
| ** **               | ** ** |
| Omaha,  Nebraska         |       |
| March 16,  2005     |       |

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Petty, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ROO Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

      (a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that material  information  relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others,  particularly  during the period in which this  report is
being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's  disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c)  disclosed  in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent functions);

      (a) all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

August 22, 2005

/s/ Robert Petty
-----------------------
Robert Petty
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1  I, Dempsey Mork, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report for the period ended Sept. 30, 2008 on Form 10-Q of China Holdings, Inc.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Oct. 1, 2008  /s/ Dempsey Mork Dempsey Mork Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1


           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8, (File #333-10053) of CET Services, Inc. of our report dated January
26, 2007, except for Notes A and M as to which the date is February 23, 2007,
on the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2006 and for each
of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2006, which appears on page
F-2 of this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2006.

/s/ GHP Horwath, P.C.

GHP HORWATH, P.C.

Denver, Colorado
March 8, 2007
**-  North Atlantic  
-  Eastern Regional Rsch. Ctr. 
-  Dairy Processing and Products Research 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">	You are here: 						Research / 								**Research Project:**New and Improved Processes for Texturizing Milk Components
**Location: Dairy Processing and Products Research**
												Project Number: 1935-41000-065-00Project Type:																				Appropriated

Start Date: Jun 16, 2004End Date: Jun 15, 2009

**Objective:**1) Develop thermal (50-90 C) and non-thermal (**Approach:**Changes in texture of whey protein concentrates and isolates, alone or in combination with starches and polysaccharides, will be induced through thermal and non-thermal processing.  Thermal and non-thermal extrusion process parameters that affect structure and function relative to texturization of whey proteins will be determined.  The properties of the shear-texturized proteins, such as elasticity, gelling strength, expansion, foaming and porosity will be evaluated, along with the rheology and network structure shear-induced viscosity changes that result from changes in protein structure.  The thermal and non-thermal texturized proteins will be used alone or to create co-products which will be linked with other polymers such as soy, carbohydrates and other dairy proteins, to create functionalized foods such as low carbohydrate or low-glycemic index snacks, meat extenders and meat analogs.
    Project TeamOnwulata, Charles Tunick, Michael Qi, Phoebe Tomasula, Peggy  
Project Annual Reports FY 2008 FY 2007 FY 2006 FY 2005 Publications  Publications 
Related National Programs Quality and Utilization of Agricultural Products(306) Patents Method For Producing A High-Protein Dough Using Cold Extrusion  							Last Modified: 06/14/2009 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24889]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Region IV Jacksonville, Florida District; Advisory Council 
Meeting, Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration Jacksonville, Florida 
District Advisory Council will hold a public meeting from 12:00 p.m. to 
2:00 p.m., October 9, 1997, at the District Office conference room, 
7825 Baymeadows Way, Suite 100-B, Jacksonville, Florida, to discuss 
such matters as may be presented by members, staff of the U.S. Small 
Business Administration, or others present.
    For further information, write or call Claudia D. Taylor, U.S. 
Small Business Administration, 7825 Baymeadows Way, Suite 100-B, 
Jacksonville, Florida 32256-7504, telephone (904) 443-1933.

    Dated: September 12, 1997.
Eugene Carlson,
Associate Administrator, Office of Communications & Public Liaison.
[FR Doc. 97-24889 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-U-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10455 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHRISTOPHER VERNER,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(1:00-CR-79-2)

-------------------- October 15, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, AND BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Christopher Verner appeals his conviction

for conspiracy to receive, possess, and conceal firearms, and

receipt and possession of stolen firearms in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§§ 371, 922(j). He argues that the district court erred in denying

his motion to suppress evidence allegedly seized in violation of

his Fourth Amendment rights.

This court applies a two-tier standard in reviewing a district

court’s denial of a motion to suppress. U nited States v. Hunt

, 253

F.3d 227, 229 (5th Cir. 2001). The district court’s fact findings2

are reviewed for clear error and its ultimate conclusion as to the

constitutionality of the law enforcement action is reviewed de

novo. I d. at 229-30. The evidence is viewed in the light most

favorable to the prevailing party. Id. at 230.

Verner concedes that the initial stop of his vehicle was

justified, but he argues that the search of his person and

subsequent detainment lasted beyond that which is allowed by Terry

v. Ohio

, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). Under T erry , “police officers may stop

and briefly detain an individual for investigative purposes if they

have reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot.”

Goodson v. City of Co rpus Christi , 202 F.3d 730, 736 (5th Cir.

2000) . Reasonable suspicion must be supported by particular and

articulable facts, which, taken together with rational inferences

from those facts, reasonably warrant an intrusion. Id

.

Whi le Officer Bone was questioning Verner, he attempted to

walk away from the officer and wa s subsequently searched and

handcuffed. Verner was also non-responsive when Officer Bone asked

whether there were any weapons in the vehicle. Viewing the

e vidence in the light most favorable to the government the

officer’s actions were reasonable. S ee Terry

, 392 U.S. at 27;

United States v. Michelletti , 13 F.3d 838, 840-41 (5th Cir. 1994)

(en banc).

The district court did not err in denying Verner’s motion to

suppress.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GSI Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2009 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn Davis, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) the Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

October 1, 2010 

This Certification shall notbe deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, or incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s filings with theSecurities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filings to the Report. 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to GSI Group Inc. and will be retained by GSI Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 00-6515.

#### Griffiths *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Apprendi*v. *New Jersey,*530 U. S. 466 (2000).
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Observationsof simulated meteors**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.12/2:5/4
Item Number:0909-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:001068616
 
August 29, 2018
----

 

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Empyrean Holdings, Inc.., a Nevadacorporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,Robert L. Lee, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect. 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Robert L. Lee                               ***

Robert L. Lee, President

 

Dated: May 4, 2005                           

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dave & Buster's, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 4, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I, W. C. Hammett, Jr.,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ W. C. Hammett, Jr.



W. C. Hammett, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
September 9, 2002
#### Tip Smith PARKER, Relator, v. Honorable Broward WILLIAMS, as State Treasurer and ex officio Insurance Commissioner of the State of Florida and Honorable Irving S. Bober as Hearing Examiner for the Florida Insurance Department, Respondents.

No. L-474.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

June 26, 1969.

Rehearing Denied July 29, 1969.

Mitchell & Mitchell, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Seymour H. Rowland, Tallahassee, for respondents.

JOHNSON, Judge.

This suggestion for writ of prohibition originally filed in the circuit court of Leon County, but upon stipulation and order of that court transferred to this court, bases its suggestion for the writ primarily upon the failure of the State Treasurer and ex officio Insurance Commissioner of the State of Florida to promulgate and publish rules of procedure for hearings of the kind involved here, to wit: revocation of an insurance agent’s license.

Rule Nisi was entered by the circuit court and a motion to quash said Rule Nisi was filed by the respondent prior to the transfer of said cause to this court, along with a return to said rule. These are properly before this court at this time and a study of the return to the rule shows that a copy of the rules of procedure • are attached to said return. These rules appear to be somewhat scanty in detail, but appear to us to be sufficient to acquaint the relator and his attorneys with the necessary requisites for preparing a defense to the charges. It further appears that at the date of filing the suggestion for writ of prohibition in the circuit court, on April 18, 1969, and the certificate of the Secretary of State, April 1, 1969, that the rules in question had not been filed with the Secretary of State as required by chapter 120, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., but it also *400appears that on the same date the Rule Nisi was issued, as shown from the copies of the rules attached to respondent’s return to said rule, said rules were filed in the office of Secretary of State, on to wit, April 18, 1969. This defect having been corrected by the respondent, and the pleadings appearing otherwise to be in proper order, the suggestion for writ of prohibition is denied, but the respondent is directed to give relator further written notice of hearing on said matter at least 20 days prior to said hearing.

The Rule Nisi is quashed with directions as set forth supra.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and SPECTOR, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                           <C>               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1997       DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                        $119,985          $81,977
<SECURITIES>                  $0                $0
<RECEIVABLES>                 $9,646,571        $3,372,513
<ALLOWANCES>                  $0                $0
<INVENTORY>                   $0                $0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              $638,127          $1,086,646
<PP&E>                        $0                $0
<DEPRECIATION>                $0                $0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                $9,818,159        $3,597,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         $6,792,652        $1,785,958
<BONDS>                       $0                $0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         $0                $0
<PREFERRED>                   $0                $0
<COMMON>                      $1,000,000        $1,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                    $14,341           $11,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  $9,818,158        $3,597,181
<SALES>                       $0                $0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              $578,147          $438,857
<CGS>                         $0                $0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 $569,971          $435,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              $0                $0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              $0                $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            $357,754          $264,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>               $8,176            $3,259
<INCOME-TAX>                  $5,854            $415
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           $0                $0
<DISCONTINUED>                $0                $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               $0                $0
<CHANGES>                     $0                $0
<NET-INCOME>                  $2,322            $2,845
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 $0.02             $0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                 $0.02             $0.03


</TABLE>