alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alvin Olanda GILBERT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 75-4379.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 13, 1977.

Maxwell C. Wright, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellant.

Edward B. McDonough, Jr., U. S. Atty., James R. Gough, George A. Kelt, Jr., Jack O’Donnell, Asst. U. S. Attys., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before AINSWORTH, CLARK and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This Court’s opinion is reported at 537 F.2d 118, in which we affirmed the conviction of appellant Gilbert.

The Supreme Court of the United States on February 28, 1977, - U.S. -, 97 S.Ct. 1169, 51 L.Ed.2d 578 vacated the judgment and remanded the case to this Court for reconsideration “in light of the position presently asserted by the government.” The government’s position was based on the recent cases of *Solimine v. United States,*429 U.S. 990, 97 S.Ct. 517, 50 L.Ed.2d 603 (1976) and *United States v. Gaddis,*424 U.S. 544, 96 S.Ct. 1023, 47 L.Ed.2d 222 (1976) to the effect that a jury verdict of guilty of both robbery and possession of the proceeds from that robbery was improper.

In the present case Gilbert was convicted on Count I of theft from an interstate freight shipment, on Count II of possession of the goods so stolen, on Count III theft from another interstate freight shipment, and on Count IV with possession of those goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659. In our prior per curiam opinion, we determined the evidence to be sufficient to establish guilt as to possession of the stolen property as charged in Counts II and IV. That finding is reaffirmed. We did not pass on the sufficiency of evidence on Counts I and III relative to theft, finding it unnecessary to do so under the concurrent sentence doctrine.

It is now clear that the convictions on Counts I and III relative to theft must be vacated and set aside.

Accordingly, we remand this case to the District Court with directions to enter judgment vacating, annulling and setting aside the convictions heretofore adjudged as to Counts I and III; the judgment of conviction as to Counts II and IV, however, shall remain.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

15 U.S.C. SECTION 7241

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jan L. Schott, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30, 2015



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jan L. Schott                                
|Jan L. Schott                                    
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 REMOTE DYNAMICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Remote Dynamics, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-K/A for
the period ended August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Dennis R. Casey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company. /s/ Dennis R. CaseyDennis R. CaseyPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)June 24, 2005
#### Lavern LEWTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-2.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 2, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Ray DeLano PATTERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-53.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Aug. 21, 1969.

Ray DeLano Patterson, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James Robert Yon, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Wilder v. State, 156 So.2d 395 (Fla.App.1963); Dunbar v. State, 220 So.2d 366 (Fla.1969), and Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487, 82 S.Ct. 510, 7 L.Ed.2d 473 (1962).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K„ and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
#### JUICE CORPORATION OF AMERICA v. MODERN FOODS, INC.

No. 38881.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 3, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.49

November 13, 2000

Stout Partnership
101 Jessup Road
Thorofare, New Jersey 08086

Ladies/Gentlemen:

Please refer to the Subordination Agreement dated as of June 30, 2000 (the
"Subordination Agreement") between you and the undersigned. Unless otherwise
defined herein, terms used herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the
Subordination Agreement. The parties hereby agree that Schedule I to the
Subordination Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the following is
substituted therefor:

"EXCEPTIONS:
The Borrower may (i) make interest payments on the Stout Note in accordance with
the terms thereof, and (ii) with the approval of the Required Banks (as defined
in the Credit Agreement), use the Net Cash Proceeds (as defined in the Credit
Agreement) from the sale of Clean Earth, Inc. to first, repay in full the Term
Loans (as defined in the Credit Agreement), second, repay the Stout Note, and
third, repay the other obligations under the Credit Agreement."

This letter is limited to the matters specifically set forth herein and shall
not be deemed to constitute an amendment, waiver or consent with respect to any
other matter whatsoever. Except as specifically set forth herein, the
Subordination Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and is hereby
ratified in all respects.

This letter may be executed in counterparts and by the parties hereto on
separate counterparts. This letter shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Illinois applicable to contracts made and to be performed entirely within such
State.

Please evidence your agreement to the foregoing by signing and returning a
counterpart of this letter.

Very truly yours,

U.S. PLASTIC LUMBER CORP.

By:
   --------------------------------------------
Title: John W. Poling, Chief Financial Officer


Accepted and Agreed
as of the date first written above:

STOUT PARTNERSHIP
By:
   ---------------------------------------
Title: Mark S. Alsentzer, Managing Partner
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Jean-Pierre M. Ergas, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BWAY Corporation (the Company) and Kevin C. Kern, Vice-President of
Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended September 28, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: December 23, 2003                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|/s/ Jean-Pierre M. Ergas                                 
|                                                         
|Jean-Pierre M. Ergas Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|/s/ Kevin C. Kern                                                         
|                                                                          
|Kevin C. Kern Vice-President of
Administration and Chief Financial Officer
No. 00-1011.

#### Calcano-Martinez et al. *v.*Immigration and Naturalization Service.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted. Brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, February 26, 2001. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, March 28, 2001. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, April 16, 2001. This Court’s Rule 29.2 is suspended in this case.
ALASKAN SEAFOOD
CBI REPL AC EME NT PAGE
EPA
- HQ
- OW
- 2013
- 0652

DCN:_ 00449CBI

THE FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N REMOVED BE CAUSE IT CONT AINS CONF ID ENT IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA TION (CB I) PER 40 CFR P ART 2, SU BP ART B .
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Yosen Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.   The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   Information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|November 15, 2016 | /s/ Zhenggang Wang                                   | 
|----------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | 
|                  | Zhenggang Wang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|                  | (Principal Executive Officer)                       
|                  |                                                      | 
|November 15, 2016 | /s/ Weiping Wang                                     | 
|                  | Weiping Wang, Chief Financial Officer               
|                  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the "Form 10-Q/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: January 21, 2011/s/ William Yan Sui HuiWilliam Yan Sui Hui,
Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. William GLOVER.

No. 61115.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1978.

Meyer Sabludowsky, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Lindsay Larson, III, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Case 4:05-cv-01188-JEJ Document 10 Filed 09/02/05 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:05-cv-01188-JEJ Document 10 Filed 09/02/05 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:05-cv-01188-JEJ Document 10 Filed 09/02/05 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of International Commercial Television
Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  Kelvin Claney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and  Karl Redekopp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that,  to  the  best  of  our  knowledge  and  belief:

1.   the  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   the  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

          Date: November 14, 2005
                                   Signed:  /s/ Kelvin Claney
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

                                   Signed:  /s/Karl Redekopp
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Chief Financial Officer
122 STAT. 4772 PUBLIC LAW 110–418—OCT. 14, 2008 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3550: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008): 

Sept. 24, considered and passed Senate. 

Sept. 29, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 110–418 

110th Congress 

An Act 

To designate a portion of the Rappahannock River in the Commonwealth of Virginia 

as the ‘‘John W. Warner Rapids’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JOHN W. WARNER RAPIDS, FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The portion of the Rappahannock River comprised of the manmade rapids located at the site of the former 

Embrey Dam in Fredericksburg, Virginia, and centered at the 

coordinates of N. 38.3225 latitude, W. 077.4900 longitude, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘John W. Warner Rapids’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the portion 

of the Rappahannock River referred to in subsection (a) shall be 

deemed to be a reference to the John W. Warner Rapids. 

Approved October 14, 2008. 

Oct. 14, 2008 

[S. 3550] 


kgrant on POHRRP4G1 with PUBLAW
No. D-2231.

#### In re Disbarment of McFlynn.

Timothy B. McFlynn, of Aspen, Colo., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Klamath Fishery Management Council; Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C. App. I), this notice announces a meeting of the Klamath 
Fishery Management Council, established under the authority of the 
Klamath River Basin Fishery Resources Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 460ss 
et seq.). The Klamath Fishery Management Council makes recommendations 
to agencies that regulate harvest of anadromous fish in the Klamath 
River Basin. This purpose of this meeting is to review management of 
the 1997 fishery season and discuss management strategies for the 1998 
season. The meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The Klamath Fishery Management Council will meet from 3 p.m. to 
5 p.m. on Wednesday, October 1, 1997; from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on 
Thursday, October 2, 1997; and from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. on Friday, 
October 3, 1997.

PLACE: The meeting will be held at the Best Western Brookings Inn, 
Highway 101 North, Brookings, Oregon.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Ronald A. Iverson, Project Leader, 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, PO Box 1006 (1215 South Main), Yreka, 
California 96097-1006, telephone (916) 842-5763.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For background information on the Klamath 
Council, please refer to the notice of their initial meeting that 
appeared in the Federal Register on July 8, 1987 (52 FR 25639).

    Dated: September 2, 1997.
Cynthia U. Barry,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 97-23936 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | To      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of the Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      11, 2010 | /s/      John V. Moran       |   | /s/      Jeffery G. Hough            |   |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 | John      V. Moran           |   | Jeffery      G. Hough                |   |
|                                 | Chief      Executive Officer |   | Senior      Vice President and Chief |   |
|                                 |                         |   | Financial      Officer               |   |
#### DREW TILE SUPPLY COMPANY, Appellant, v. GENERAL TILE COMPANY, Inc., et al., Appellees.

No. 68-415.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

June 11, 1969.

Rehearing Denied July 15, 1969.

David Hyman, Tampa, for apppellant.

Leonard H. Gilbert, of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Tampa, for appellees.

*431MANN, Judge.

The trial judge held on sufficient evidence that the second mortgage held by-appellant was invalid as an unlawful preference proscribed by Florida Statutes § 608.55 (1965), F.S.A. He correctly allowed amendment of the pleadings to conform to proof that the holder of the second mortgage paid $1300.12 to the holder of the first mortgage to protect its security position, but did not in the final decree make a finding respecting this amount. Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed in part and reversed for further proceedings respecting the claim for credit in the amount of $1300.12.

LILES, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
#### Tessie CZUCHTA, Appellant, v. Merwin W. WILLIARD; Merwin W. Williard and Evelyn Williard, his wife; and Symetrics Engineering Corporation of Florida, Appellees.

No. 2133.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 5, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 1970.

Ernest R. Drosdick of Lowndes, Peirsol, Drosdick, & Baker, Orlando, for appellant.

No appearance for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal by the plaintiff, Tessie Czuchta, from an order of the trial court permitting Symetrics Engineering Corporation of Florida to intervene in a cause pending between the plaintiff and Merwin W. Williard and Evelyn Wil-liard, his wife, defendants. We have reviewed the order from which the appeal has been taken as well as the brief and appendix filed by the appellant (none of the other parties favored us with a brief). From our foregoing review we are unable to conclude that harmful error has been made to appear; therefore, the order appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

McCAIN, REED, and OWEN, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1977 

To repeal section 5 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2005 

Mr. STEVENS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To repeal section 5 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act 

of 1972. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF SECTION 5 OF THE MARINE MAM4 MAL PROTECTION ACT OF 1972. 

5 Section 5 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 

6 1972 (33 U.S.C. 476) is repealed. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter  ending March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Paul W. Andre,  Treasurer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 4, 2006



                                        By: /s/ PAUL W. ANDRE
                                            ___________________________
                                                Paul W. Andre
                                                Treasurer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer