alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in
Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Justin J. File, Controller of Sequenom, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d), of the Exchange Act, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which
it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the Quarterly Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set their hands hereto as of the 9th day of November, 2009.



/S/ JUSTIN J. FILEJustin J. File Controller(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[115th Congress Public Law 152]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 132 STAT. 1236]]

Public Law 115-152
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 430 Main Street in Clermont, Georgia, as the ``Zack T. Addington Post 
            Office''. <<NOTE: Mar. 23, 2018 -  [H.R. 3821]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ZACK T. ADDINGTON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 430 Main Street in Clermont, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Zack T. Addington Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Zack T. 
Addington Post Office''.

    Approved March 23, 2018.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3821:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 163 (2017):
                                    Nov. 15, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 164 (2018):
                                    Mar. 7, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# Iris Oifigiúil C 168I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | C 168I |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 645 Bealtaine 2021 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

C 168I

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

645 Bealtaine 2021

---

| Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Faisnéis |
| | DEARBHUITHE COMHPHÁIRTEACHA |
| | Parlaimint na hEorpaAn Chomhairle |
| 2021/C 168 I/01 | Dearbhú comhpháirteach ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle maidir leis an tsraith Luachanna an Aontais a mhaoiniú in 2021 | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

II   Faisnéis

DEARBHUITHE COMHPHÁIRTEACHA

Parlaimint na hEorpaAn Chomhairle

2021/C 168 I/01

Dearbhú comhpháirteach ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle maidir leis an tsraith Luachanna an Aontais a mhaoiniú in 2021

1

---

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

II Faisnéis

DEARBHUITHE COMHPHÁIRTEACHA

Parlaimint na hEorpa An Chomhairle

| 5.5.2021 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | CI 168/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2021

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

CI 168/1

---

Dearbhú comhpháirteach ó Pharlaimint na hEorpa agus ón gComhairle maidir leis an tsraith Luachanna an Aontais a mhaoiniú in 2021

(2021/C 168 I/01)

Gan dochar do chumhachtaí an údaráis bhuiséadaigh, aontaíonn na comhreachtóirí gur cheart cistiú substaintiúil a thabhairt don tsraith Luachanna an Aontais den Chlár um Shaoránaigh, Comhionannas, Cearta agus Luachanna ón 1 Eanáir 2021 ar aghaidh.

Iarrann na comhreachtóirí ar an gCoimisiún na gníomhaíochtaí iomchuí a dhéanamh chun an cuspóir sin a bhaint amach, go háirithe measúnú a dhéanamh ar an úsáid a bhaintear as ionstraimí solúbthachta faoi chreat dlíthiúil bhuiséad bliantúil an Aontais do 2021, i gcomhréir leis na critéir maidir le gníomhachtú a leagtar síos i Rialachán CAI.

---
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of KIT digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kaleil Isaza
Tuzman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Date:
      November 22, 2010
              /s/ Kaleil Isaza TuzmanKaleil
      Isaza Tuzman
                Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24402]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1186-DR]


Colorado; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Colorado, (FEMA-1186-DR), dated August 1, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 5, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster for the State 
of Colorado, is hereby amended to include the following areas among 
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the 
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of August 1, 1997:

    Lincoln and Prowers Counties for Public Assistance.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Dennis H. Kwiatkowski,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-24402 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
**E****XHIBIT****32******


**H** **ERBORIUM** **G** **ROUP,** **I** **NC.**


**C****ERTIFICATION****P****URSUANT****T****O****18
      U.S.C.********S****ECTION****1350,******


**A** **S** **A** **DOPTED** **P** **URSUANT** **T** **O** **S** **ECTION** **906
      O** **F** **T** **HE** **S** **ARBANES-** **O** **XLEY** **A** **CT** **O** **F** **2002** ****





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Herborium Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Agnes Olszewski,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.


*Date*:October
                  22,
                  2007*/s/Agnes
                Olszewski**Agnes
                    Olszewski*
                  *Chief
                    Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and*
                  *Chief
                    Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
                    Officer)*




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Ground water in Permafrost regions--an annotated bibliography

By: John R. Williams

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1792

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Ground water in permafrost regions - an annotated bibliography of publications through 1960, with glossary of terms(1963)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FILED AS 
PART OF THIS FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         121,206
<SECURITIES>                                    21,389
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,937
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               213,851
<PP&E>                                          44,758
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 317,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,309
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                     235,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   317,386
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               227,141
<CGS>                                            4,882
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               160,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,679
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 52,497
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,334
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,163
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,163
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.81
        

</TABLE>
## THEAITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

Honorable

H. A. Hodges CountyAuditor,

WillMmson County Ge&+mm, Texas
Dear Sir: : 0pinion,No. 

## O-7087 Re: If?municipal

bonds held by the County Iilprovements Fund, are sold, may the premium from such bond8 be lnve8tedin U. S. Government

Bonds?
We acknowledge

re&pt of yc$ opinionrequest of recent date, end quote from letter, (18

follows: 'IThia County'8Permanent School Fund ownm quite a lot of Municipal Bon&a for which an offer of rreieral hundred dollerrpremiumhas be-. made, if the rale lr made the principal and the premium~111 be invertedlz'b. 5. Government Bon&, by the Inverting of the premirrm In bonda therewill be good findnclal gein over the maturityof the bon& rold.

. "An the law directa the interert and learemoney, except oil anu.. mineral leaae6,be trsnnferred to the State and County Available School Fund for appor:~kkmmnn~ -to the various Conrmon and Independent School Diatricte

on a'per capita rcholsrtlc berir it bar occurredto me that premlunuon bonda may be held a8 Interest, if 110 the law would not permit the une of the premium to purchaseadditional bon&. “Kindly give me an opinionrtating whether or not the Commidlionere' Court would be authorized under the law to Invest the premiumof bOnda mold in the purchaseof bonda for the use and benefit of the County Permanent

School Fund?" The AttorneyGeneral'8 officeheld in Opinion Number O-823, copy of which is enclosed,

that profit derived from purchase,sale, and reinvestment of the cash in the Permanent SchoolFund of a county should become-apart of the Available

Fund (citing

Art. 7, Section 

## 6,Constitution of Texas).
In line with that opinion, we believe that the premiumreceived from the sale of bonds held by the Permanent School Fund becomes a part of the Available

Fund.Hon. H. A. Hodgee - Pege 2 (O-7087)

You are advieed,therefore, that the Commieeionere' Court would not'be authorized

under the law to Invest the premium from bonde aold in the purcheeeof bonds for the use and bei$efit of the County Permanent School Fund. Very truly youre, ATTORNEX

-oFTExAs a/ Claud 0. Boothmen

COB: v/ldw Enclosure 1
APPROVEDFEB. 23, 1946 CARLas c .

~'TCSHIEY FIRST ASSISTANT A!lTORNEYGENEBAL
APPROVED OPINIONCOMMITTEE By B. W. B. CHAIRMAN By Claud 0. Boothman Assistant
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael JUENGAIN.

No. 60767.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 11, 1978.

Clyde D. Merritt, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Philip J. Boudousque, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

SUMMERS, Justice.

In a June 6, 1976 indictment the grand jury of Orleans Parish charged Michael Ju-negain in two counts with the February 26, 1976 second degree murder of Aldin R. Pierce and his sister Catherine Francois. On February 4, 1977 the count involving Pierce was nolle pressed and the prosecution proceeded for the killing of Catherine Francois.

A plea of not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity was entered by the defendant and after trial by jury on October 13, 1976 defendant Juengain was found guilty as charged. He was sentenced to serve the balance of his natural life at hard labor.

A contention is made on appeal that the trial judge committed prejudicial error in denying the defense motion for a mistrial because of the prosecutor’s remarks in rebuttal argument. Defense counsel asserts that although no mention was made of the defendant, that portion of the argument objected to was an indirect reference to the failure of defendant to testify on his own behalf, a ground for a mistrial under Article 770(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Our reading of the transcript of the pertinent part of the prosecutor’s rebuttal argument relied upon by the defense does not lead to the meaning the defense attributes to that argument. Instead, it is fair to say, the prosecutor was trying to point out to the jury that a witness’ prior criminal record should be considered in evaluating the witness’ credibility. And, to emphasize the reliability of the State’s witnesses, he called to the jury’s attention the fact that none of *551the State’s witnesses had criminal records. In doing so he said, “Now, of course, no one who took the stand today had a criminal record, so that didn’t come out, but I am giving that as an example.”

It would be difficult for the jury to understand from such an argument that the defendant had failed to testify in his own behalf. Accordingly, the defense contention is not well-founded.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

DIXON, J., dissents.
Filed 7/29/15

Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Four - No. B241727

S214150

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

En Banc

________________________________________________________________________

SALVADOR RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

RWA TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., Defendant and Appellant.

________________________________________________________________________

Defendant RWA Trucking, Inc., and the California Trucking Association‟s request 

for republication of the Court of Appeal‟s opinion, originally published at 219 

Cal.App.4th 692, is granted. The opinion is ordered republished with the following 

amendment to original footnote 6 at page 723 (additions underlined and deletions stricken 

through):

Division Five of this appellate district rejected Fitz-Gerald’s analysis in part in 

People ex rel. Harris v. Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc. (May 18, 2011, B220966) 195 

Cal.App.4th 765, review granted August 10, 2011, S194388.

Pac Anchor is currently under review by the California Supreme Court, where the 

question presented is as follows: “Is an action under the Unfair Competition Law (Bus. 

& Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) that is based on a trucking company‟s alleged violation of 

state labor and insurance laws „related to the price, route, or service‟ of the company and, 

therefore, preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 

(49 U.S.C. § 14501)?”

[Reporter‟s Note: See People ex rel. Harris v. Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc.

(2014) 59 Cal.4th 772.]

______________________________

 Chief Justice
#### Harlan Glen LAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2589.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

June 30, 1969.

*370Philip S. Shailer, Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James M. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of denial of a motion by Harlan Glen Lay pursuant to Rule 1.850, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S.A.

Lay alleges, among other things, that he was not represented in good faith by the public defender; that the public defender’s representation was insufficient, inadequate and incompetent in that he failed to prepare, investigate and inform petitioner about his case; the public defender failed to inform Lay about the legal effect of defense available; that the public defender prevailed upon the appellant to enter a plea of nolo contendere. Accordingly, Lay maintains his conviction and sentence should be set aside.

No evidentiary hearing was granted on Lay’s motion. Lay’s allegations were not refuted by the state. Inconsistent with Rule 1.850, F.S.A. the trial court erred in not granting an evidentiary hearing on this motion. Estrella v. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d489; Bush v. State, Fla.App.1968, 209 So.2d 696; Bennett v State, Fla.App. 1967, 203 So.2d 211.

This cause is reversed and remanded for complete and prompt evidentiary hearing.

WALDEN, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
#### Village of Euclid et al. *v.*Fischer.

*Supreme court*— Dismissals—Moot *questions.*

(No. 17619

Decided March 13, 1923.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. David A. Christopher,*city solicitor, for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. White, Brewer & Curtiss*and *Mr. Charles A. Hyde,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered by the court that this cause be, and the same hereby is, dismissed on authority of *Miner*v. *Witt,*82 Ohio St., 237, 92 N. E., 23.

*Dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.