alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 2, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 136005(18) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 136005 COA: 284102 Oakland CC: 2006-207327-FC JAMES NORMAN PERRY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 13, 2008 order is considered, an d it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

W EAVER and C ORRIGAN , JJ., would grant the motion for reconsideration.

M ARKMAN , J., would grant the motion for rec onsideration and hold this case in abeyance for People v Watkins (Docket No. 135787), 480 Mich __ (2008), in which this Court has granted leave to appeal to consid er constitutional and other issues pertaining to MCL 768.27a.

d0429 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 2, 2008

Clerk
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**WRITTEN
      STATEMENT**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with this Quarterly Report of China 3C Group and its subsidiaries
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, Weidong Huang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





May
                16, 2008
            /s/
                Weidong HuangWeidong
                HuangChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer)
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76

38 39 40


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 07/08 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
#### Willie Dee JONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-532.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 16, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-217-001]


Colorado Interstate Gas Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

September 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 2, 1997, Colorado Interstate Gas 
Company (CIG), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets identified below to be 
effective December 31, 1996:

Substitute Original Sheet No. 406
Substitute Original Sheet No. 412
Substitute Original Sheet No. 426

    CIG states it has discovered an error in its tariff and is filing 
to make a correction. On November 26, 1996, CIG filed a compliance 
filing pursuant to an order that issued November 14, 1996, in Docket 
No. RP97-27-000. In the compliance filing CIG submitted Substitute 
Second Revised Sheet No. 97, Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 123, 
and Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 157. These tariff sheets were 
filed to specify Shipper's Maximum Daily Injection Quantity and Maximum 
Daily Withdrawal Quantity in CIG's Rates Schedules NNT-1, NNT-2 and FS-
1 Form of Service Agreements. Additionally, the Agreements were 
modified to state that each Shipper's Available Daily withdrawal 
Quantity will be stated in CIG's Xpress system. A Letter Order issued 
December 16, 1996, accepting these sheets.
    CIG further states on December 31, 1996, it filed in Docket No. 
RP97-217-000 a tariff filing to comply with the Commission's Order No. 
582 requirements. Pursuant to Section 154.103(a) CIG moved its Form of 
Service Agreements to a location after the General Terms and 
Conditions. When CIG filed these tariff sheets it inadvertently omitted 
the language approved in the December 16, 1996 Order. An Order issued 
January 27, 1997, approving the Docket No. PR97-217-000 tariff sheets 
with the omitted language. CIG is filing herein to correct this error.
    CIG states that copies of the filing were served upon CIG's 
jurisdictional customers and public bodies.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C., 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such 
protest must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make the protestants parties to the proceedings. Copies of the 
filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24077 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
## NO. 12

- 10

- 00 201

- C R NO. 12

- 10

- 00202

- CR NO. 12

- 10

- 00203

- CR NO. 12

- 10

- 00204

- CR NO. 12

- 10

- 00205

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

' IN RE: TIMOTHY CARNEL RAINEY, RELATOR ' ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
' MEMORANDU

M OPINION Relator Timothy Carnel Rainey complains of a standing order issued by the Honorable Christi J. Kennedy, Judge of the 114th Judicial District Court, Smith County,
Texas , and the Honorable Kerry L. Russell, Judge of the 7th Judicial District Court , also in Smith County . Rainey contends that the order was issued “from the Smith County Court Collections to order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to collect from [his] account trust fund without due process. ” He seeks a writ of mandamus compel lin g either judge “to have its findings of fact and conclusions of law filed with the courts clerk, separate and apart from its [judgment], and cause its findings and conclusions to be served on all the parties.” A party seeking mandamus relief must genera lly bring forward all that is necessary to establish the claim for relief. See Walker , 827 S.W.2d at 837; In re Pena , 104 S.W.3d 719, 719 (Tex. App.

- Tyler 2003, orig. proceeding); see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
52. Therefore, it is Rainey’s burden to provide t his court with a sufficient record to establish his right to mandamus relief. See Walker , 827 S.W.2d at 837; In re Pena , 104
S.W.3d 719. When a petition for writ of mandamus is filed, Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4 requires that it be accompanied by an appendix that includes a certified or sworn2

copy of any order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained
of. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.4(k)(1)(A). Unless voluminous or impracticable, the appendix
must also include the text or a ny statute or other law (excluding case law) on which the argument is based. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.4(k)(1)(C). Here, Rainey did not file the required appendix along with his mandamus petition. Therefore, we are unable to
determine whether he is entitle d to mandamus relief. Accordingly, Rainey’s petition for
writ of mandamus is denied

.

JAMES T. WORTHEN Chief Justice

Opinion delivered June 30 , 2010. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., an d Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
#### Ira GOLDSMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-28.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Jan. 15, 1970.

Ira Goldsmith, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The record and briefs having been read and given full consideration and appellant *190having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order appealed is hereby affirmed. Hunter v. State, 174 So.2d 415 (Fla.App.3d, 1965); Jolly v. Wainwright, 175 So.2d 245 (Fla.App.2d, 1965).

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Case 4:06-cr-00097-JEJ Document 2 Filed 03/13/06 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:06-cr-00097-JEJ Document 2 Filed 03/13/06 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:06-cr-00097-JEJ Document 2 Filed 03/13/06 Page 3 of 3
Case 4:09-cv-02178-JEJ Document 49 Filed 07/30/10 Page 1 of 8
Case 4:09-cv-02178-JEJ Document 49 Filed 07/30/10 Page 2 of 8
Case 4:09-cv-02178-JEJ Document 49 Filed 07/30/10 Page 3 of 8
Case 4:09-cv-02178-JEJ Document 49 Filed 07/30/10 Page 4 of 8
Case 4:09-cv-02178-JEJ Document 49 Filed 07/30/10 Page 5 of 8
Case 4:09-cv-02178-JEJ Document 49 Filed 07/30/10 Page 6 of 8
Case 4:09-cv-02178-JEJ Document 49 Filed 07/30/10 Page 7 of 8
Case 4:09-cv-02178-JEJ Document 49 Filed 07/30/10 Page 8 of 8
#### Hiram Cazes PARNELL v. STATE of Florida (2 cases).

Nos. 38916, 38917.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Appeals dismissed without opinion.
EXHIBIT 10.19

                                FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     This First Amendment is dated as of October 23, 2001, effective as of
August 21, 2001, and is made in respect of the Employment Agreement dated as of
August 11, 2000, effective as of August 21, 2000 (the "Agreement"), by and
between IEC ELECTRONICS CORP., a Delaware corporation ("IEC" or the "Company"),
and THOMAS W. LOVELOCK ("Executive").

     WHEREAS, Section 4B of the Agreement provides that IEC will pay a portion
of the premiums on term life insurance on the life of Executive; and

     WHEREAS, after completion of a performance review and in recognition of the
effective performance of Executive during the past year, the Board of Directors
deems it appropriate and desirable to pay all the premiums on Executive's term
life insurance, and to grant Executive a stock option for 25,000 shares of IEC
common stock.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and
valuable consideration, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

        1. All of the terms used in this First Amendment
shall have the meanings defined in the Agreement.

        2. Section 4B the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced by a
new Section 4B, which will read as follows:

               "4B. Insurance. So long as Executive is employed
                by IEC, the Company will pay the premiums on term
                life insurance on his life in the face amount of
                two times Base Salary. IEC will have no interest
                in or claim to such life insurance policy and Executive
                will have the sole right to designate the beneficiaries."

        3. Stock Options. Pursuant to the Company's 1993 Stock Option Plan, IEC
will grant Executive as of September 10, 2001 a stock option for 25,000 shares
of IEC common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of IEC's
common stock on said date. The option will vest in 25% increments beginning one
year from the date of grant and will expire seven years from the date of grant
and will contain such other terms and conditions as are customary
in the Company's stock options.

        4. Except as modified by this First Amendment, the Agreement remains in
full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to
be duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first above written.

                                        IEC ELECTRONICS CORP.


                                        By:
                                        W. Barry Gilbert
                                        Chairman of the Board of Directors


                                        EXECUTIVE


                                        Thomas W. Lovelock





                                 Page 49 of 60
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10-x    
  


 
 

Oral Agreement Regarding Health Insurance Coverage    
  


        Oral Agreement, effective as of November 16, 2001, between ADC Telecommunications, Inc. ("ADC") and Peter W. Hemp ("Hemp"). 


        In
connection with Hemp's retirement from ADC on November 16, 2001, ADC agreed to pay the employer portion of Hemp's COBRA medical and dental insurance coverage for one calendar
month following his termination of employment, through December 31, 2001. ADC's total costs for such coverage total $490.75, as follows: 



	COBRA Medical
 
	 	 

	

Employer Cost	
 	
$	

449.90
	Employee Cost	 	$	109.72
	 	 	

	Total Cost	 	$	559.62
	
COBRA Dental
	
 	
 	

 
	
Employer Cost	
 	
$	

40.85
	Employee Cost	 	$	20.32
	 	 	

	Total	 	$	61.17





        In
order to receive payment from ADC, Hemp is required to submit his enrollment documents to ADC's third-party vendor in accordance with COBRA regulations. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10-x


Oral Agreement Regarding Health Insurance Coverage
BELOW IS A TRANSLATION OF A DOCUMENT RECEIVED IN CHINESE


Date:      Nov  16,  2001


To:        Arthur  Zheng
           President
           UltraCard  China,  Inc.
           1622  Nan  Jing  Xi  Lu,  391  Floor
           Shanghai

     Thank  you  for  hosting  the  High Data Storage Card Demonstration at your
office.  We  enjoyed  the  meeting.  After  reviewing  your  Company  and  the
demonstration  of  your  technology,  we are prepared to move forward on a pilot
program  for the use of the UltraCard as an end to end solution for the Security
Control  System  and  additional  application  for  gaming.

     To  implement  this pilot program we will purchase a minimum of two million
(2,000,000)  UltraCards and ten thousand (10,000) Reader/Writers for a price not
to  exceed  fifteen-million  dollars  (US$  15,000,000).  This purchase order is
subject  to  delivery of the UltraCards and the Reader/Writers, which conform to
mutually  agreeable  specifications  and  testing,  including  5 1/4 half-height
Reader/Writer  with USB interface, and triple read capability for the UltraCard.

     Hopefully  we  will  be  able to proceed a successful cooperation with your
company.


                                             Sincerely,




                                             Yang  Yan
                                             President
                                             Shanghai G-Pro Technology Co., Ltd.


<PAGE>
#### Harold S. WILSON, Appellant, v. Ida Louise RAVEL, Appellee.

No. 68-453.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

July 16, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 15, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 18

- 00371

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

Trial Court No. 2010

- 61208

- 393

Before Gabriel, Ker r, and Pittman, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### T.C. , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the

opinion that relief should be de nied. Accordingly, relator’s pe tition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : December 3, 2018
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 177 (Friday, September 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24275]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

Advisory Committee Meeting; Cancellation

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is cancelling the joint 
meeting of the Nonprescription Drugs Advisory Committee and the 
Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee scheduled for September 19, 
1997. The meeting was announced in the Federal Register of August 14, 
1997 (62 FR 43539).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andera G. Neal or Leander B. Madoo, 
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (HFD-21), Food and Drug 
Administration 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-5455, or 
call the FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-
443-0572 in the Washington, DC area), codes 12541 and 12545.

    Dated: September 9, 1997.
Michael A. Friedman,
Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
[FR Doc. 97-24275 Filed 9-9-97; 3:19 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-M
```
Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATE OF MARTIN NIELSON
                           AS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Magtron International Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Martin Nielson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Martin Nielson
-----------------------
Martin Nielson
Chief Executive Officer
July 31, 2006




                                       35
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 49622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24934]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-219; RM-8881]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Temple, Taylor and Hutto, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission, at the request of Stellar Communications, 
Inc., reallots Channel 282C2 from Temple to Taylor, Texas, and modifies 
Station KKIK(FM)'s license accordingly. See 61 FR 58361, November 14, 
1996. Channel 282C2 can be allotted to Taylor in compliance with the 
Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a site 
restriction of 6.4 kilometers (4.0 miles) southwest. The coordinates 
for Channel 282C2 at Taylor are 30-31-18 and 97-26-40. The Commission 
also pursuant to the grant of the major change application (BPH-
821203AD) reallots Channel 221A from Taylor to Hutto, Texas. With this 
action, this proceeding is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 27, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MM Docket No. 96-219, adopted September 3, 1997, and 
released September 12, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision 
is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., Washington, 
DC. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the 
Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 1231 20th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.
    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    AUTHORITY: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Texas, is 
amended by removing Channel 282C2 at Temple and by adding Channel 282C2 
at Taylor; and by removing Channel 221A at Taylor and by adding Hutto, 
Channel 221A.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-24934 Filed 9-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         135,335
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  453,277
<ALLOWANCES>                                    48,734
<INVENTORY>                                    553,677
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,172,618
<PP&E>                                         234,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,977,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          875,525
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,147,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,977,789
<SALES>                                      2,386,550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,386,550
<CGS>                                        1,308,778
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,308,778
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               778,672
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                360,055
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,525
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            341,922
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   341,922
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
254 La. 1099

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Dolphus L. DULIN v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 50273.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 18, 1969.

In re: Dolphus L. Dulin applying for writ of habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory or original jurisdiction.