alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tullys Coffee Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 16, 2008 (the Report), I, Andrew M. Wynne, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting
officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    ANDREW M.
WYNNE                                                   
|Andrew M. Wynne                                                          
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting officer)
|September 16, 2008
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

This certification set forth below is hereby made solely for thepurpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any otherpurposes.

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Ezenia! Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. McCann,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Date: March 30, 2010 | /s/ Thomas J. McCann     |
|---------------------------|--------------------------|
|                      | Thomas J. McCann         |
|                      | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

1

----
#### Robert James MAGUIRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 75-2282.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 25, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Craig S. Barnard, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Paul H. Zacks, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review and consideration of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. We have carefully considered and reject the retroactive application of the recent decision of the Supreme Court of Florida in *Roberts v. State,*335 So.2d 285 (Fla.1976), adopting the so called “Lyles” rule. In this regard, we agree with the reasoning and rationale of the Third District in *Williams*v. *State,*La.App., 346 So.2d 554, opinion filed February 8, 1977; but see, *Ringgo v. State,*339 So.2d 293 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

MAGER, C. J., and ALDERMAN, J., concur.

DAUKSCH, J., dissents, with opinion.

DAUKSCH, Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent for the reason I do not read *Roberts v. State,*as cited, as being prospective only. Also, without *Roberts*there is enough to reverse. The Appellant here timely requested an instruction to the jury concerning the consequences of a not guilty — insanity verdict. The court denied the instruction and gave an instruction as to the consequences of a guilty verdict and an instruction on probation and parole. Appellant presented psychiatrists and a psychologist in support of his insanity defense and showed a prior history of psychiatric problems. It is presumed everyone knows the consequences of a not guilty verdict and the jury was instructed on the consequences of a guilty verdict. So there should have been an instruction as to the consequences of a not guilty — insanity verdict to keep the jury from logically thinking it might turn loose an insane killer.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-8 (No. 333-31468 and No. 333-109434) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-115698 and 333-131280) of our report dated March 5, 2004; March 22, 2005 as to the effects of the restatement described in Note 2; (which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs related to substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and related to the restatement described in Note 2) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofAirNet Communications Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Orlando,Florida 

March 23, 2006
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of dELiA*s Corp. on Form 10-Q for the
period ending November 2, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis Goldstein, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.
                               By: /s/ Dennis Goldstein
                                   --------------------
                                       Dennis Goldstein
                                       Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                       December 13, 2002
Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Numbers 033-99434, 333-19069, 333-30635,
333-44781, and 333-78241) on Form S-8 of SITEL Corporation of our reports dated January 31, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of SITEL
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the related schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K of SITEL
Corporation.

Our
report also indicates that the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, as of
January 1, 2002.

|                    |  | 
|------------------- |  | 
|/s/ KPMG LLP        |  | 
|KPMG LLP            |  | 
|Baltimore, Maryland |  | 
|March 26, 2003      |  | 

---

QuickLinks
255 La. 249

#### STATE of Louisiana, ex rel. Donald R. LEWIS v. V. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50311.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1970.

In re: Donald R. Lewis applying for writ of habeas corpus or mandamus.

Not considered. The application does not comply with the rules of this Court. See Rule XII, Sec. 7 of the Rules of this Court.

BARHAM, J.,

dissenting from refusal to consider. The majority has refused to consider this application for writ of habeas corpus under our original jurisdiction and application for writ of mandamus or habeas corpus under our supervisory jurisdiction. The refusal is based upon applicant’s failure to attach to his application a copy of his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in the trial court. We have before us the ruling on that application, his affidavit, and notice to the trial court of his intent to renew before this court his petition which had been refused by the trial court without hearing. Since we have original as well as supervisory jurisdiction, his petition to us which sets forth grounds for the issuance of a writ fully complies with our rules. Of course relator is not permanently prejudiced by the majority’s refusal to consider since he may simply reapply and append the trial court petition for writ of habeas corpus to his application.
### Compilation of records of surface waters of the United States, October 1950 to September 1960, Part 12. Pacific slope basins in Washington and upper Columbia River basin

By: E. L. HendricksFrank StermitzW. I. TravisF. M. Veatch

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1736

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Kyhos, Michael" <MKyhos@ouc.com>

Date: 7/22/2010 3:41 PM

Subject: Re: Written Extension Request for OUC Stanton Energy Center (Plant ID: 07572)

Attachments: pic32655.gif; IRC Extension Request for OUC.pdf

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension request for the steam electric effluent

guidelines questionnaire for the Stanton Energy Center facility. The

deadline for your plant to submit Version 2 of the completed

questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. If you need assistance

during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please

contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or

by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic32655.gif)

 

 From: "Kyhos, Michael" <MKyhos@ouc.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "Blair, Garfield" <GBlair@ouc.com>, "Corbett, Mark N." <MCorbett@ouc.com> 

 Date: 07/12/2010 08:34 AM 

 Subject: Written Extension Request for OUC Stanton Energy Center (Plant ID: 07572) 

Dear Ms. Alicea:

Attached please find the Orlando Utilities Commission’s Stanton Energy

Center (Plant ID: 07572) written request for extension to the NPDES

effluent guidelines and standards for the Steam Electric Power

Generating Industry information collection request questionnaire. Per

the USEPA’s original correspondence, this written request for extension

is being submitted via e-mail.

Please contact me at the numbers below if you have any questions or if

you need any additional information concerning this request.

Thank you,

Mike Kyhos

Michael Kyhos CHMM, QEP
Senior Environmental Engineer

Orlando Utilities Commission

407-434-3036 (office)

407-376-5314 (cell)

407-244-8794 (fax)

 (See attached file: IRC Extension Request for OUC.pdf)
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 1 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 2 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 3 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 4 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 5 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 6 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 7 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 8 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 9 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 10 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 11 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 12 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 13 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 14 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 15 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 16 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 17 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 18 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 19 of 20
Case 3:22-cv-02030-RDM-CA Document 44 Filed 01/05/24 Page 20 of 20
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2024 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2024

 To raise the minimum State allocation under section 217(b)(2) of the 
           Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 16, 2005

 Ms. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To raise the minimum State allocation under section 217(b)(2) of the 
           Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small State HOME Program Equity Act 
of 2005''.

SEC. 2. ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES.

    Section 217(b)(2)(A) of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable 
Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 12747(b)(2)(A)) is amended by striking 
``$3,000,000'' each place it occurs and inserting ``$5,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFlow through very porous screensFlow through and around screens with small resistance coefficient were analyzed. Both steady and oscillatory flows are considered, however, the case of a screen normal to the flow is treated. At second order in the asymptotic expansion the steady flow normal to the screen is nonuniform along the screen, due to components induced by the wake and by tangential drag. The third order pressure drop is nonuniform and the wake contains distributed vorticity, in addition to the vortex sheet along its boundary. The unsteady drag coefficient is found as a function of frequency.Document ID19850011960Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsDurbin, P. A.*(North American Aviation, Inc. Torrance, CA, United States)*Muramoto, K. K.*(North American Aviation, Inc. Torrance, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1985Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberE-2360NAS 1.60:2436NASA-TP-2436Accession Number85N20270Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-31-38Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850011960.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION  OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Kevin J. Mills, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Socket Communications,  Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents  in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of  Socket Communications, Inc. 

|   | By: /s/ Kevin        J. Mills        Name: Kevin J. Mills        Title: President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Date: March 16, 2007 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

I, David W. Dunlap, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report  of Socket Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,  2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on  Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and  results of operations of Socket Communications, Inc. 

|   | By:      /s/ David W. Dunlap      Name: David W. Dunlap      Title: Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial      Officer (Principal Financial Officer)      Date: March 16, 2007 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### FLORIDA STATE SHOPPING PLAZAS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. The COLVIS COMPANY, a North Carolina corporation, Appellee.

No. N-411.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 1, 1971.

Rehearing Denied May 4, 1971.

Mahoney, Hadlow, Chambers & Adams, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Reinstein, Reinstein & Panken and Lof-tin & Wahl, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD, Acting Chief Judge, RAWLS, J., and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge, concur.
#### WEEKI WACHEE ORCHID GARDENS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. FLORIDA INLAND THEATRES, INC. (Successor to St. Petersburg Springs Company), a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 40437.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 17, 1971.

Appeal dismissed. 239 So.2d 602.

ROBERTS, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### FINANCIAL VENTURES CONSULTANTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Irving POLLACK, et al., Appellees.

No. 69-184.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 16, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Jesse McGEE, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana, C. Paul Phelps, Director, Dept. of Corrections, Charles Foti, Sheriff, Orleans Parish Prison.

No. 61792.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1978.

In re: Jesse McGee, Jr., applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.

DIXON, J., would grant the writ.
#### Danny Ray COLSTON v. STATE.

6 Div. 217.

Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

Aug. 16, 1977.

AFTER REMAND BY THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of Reversed and Rendered is vacated. The judgment is affirmed on authority of *Colston v. State,*Ala.1977, 350 So.2d 337.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.
# Официален вестник C 83I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0855 |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 083I |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 6412 март 2021 г. |

ISSN 1977-0855

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 083I

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 6412 март 2021 г.

---

| Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Информация |
| | ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ДЪРЖАВИТЕ-ЧЛЕНКИ |
| 2021/C 83 I/01 | Информация, която държавите членки съобщават относно забрана на риболовни дейности | 1 |

Съдържание

Страница

IV   Информация

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ДЪРЖАВИТЕ-ЧЛЕНКИ

2021/C 83 I/01

Информация, която държавите членки съобщават относно забрана на риболовни дейности

1

---

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

IV Информация

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ОТ ДЪРЖАВИТЕ-ЧЛЕНКИ

| 12.3.2021 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | CI 83/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2021

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

CI 83/1

---

Информация, която държавите членки съобщават относно забрана на риболовни дейности

(2021/C 83 I/01)

В съответствие с член 35, параграф 3 от Регламент (EО) No 1224/2009 на Съвета от 20 ноември 2009 г. за създаване на система за контрол на Съюза за гарантиране на спазването на правилата на общата политика в областта на рибарството (1) беше взето решение за забрана на риболовна дейност, както е предвидено в следната таблица:

| Дата и час на въвеждане на забраната | 24.12.2020 г. |
| --- | --- |
| Продължителност | 24.12.2020 г. — 31.12.2020 г. |
| Държава членка | Португалия |
| Запас или група запаси | ALB/AN05N |
| Вид | Северен бял тон (Thunnus alalunga) |
| Зона | Атлантически океан на север от 5° с.ш. |
| Вид(ове) риболовни кораби | --- |
| Референтен номер | 40/TQ123 |

Дата и час на въвеждане на забраната

24.12.2020 г.

Продължителност

24.12.2020 г. — 31.12.2020 г.

Държава членка

Португалия

Запас или група запаси

ALB/AN05N

Вид

Северен бял тон (Thunnus alalunga)

Зона

Атлантически океан на север от 5° с.ш.

Вид(ове) риболовни кораби

---

Референтен номер

40/TQ123

---

(1)  ОВ L 343, 22.12.2009 г., стр. 1.

---