alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2433]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3666]

Brian Coryat; Prohibited Trade Practices, and Affirmative 
Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order prohibits, among other things, a 
California individual doing business as Enterprising Solutions from 
misrepresenting any credit repair product, credit reporting remedy or 
the ability to remove adverse information in any credit report. In 
addition, the consent order prohibits the respondent from 
misrepresenting profits, earnings, income, or sales from such business 
opportunity.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued June 10, 1996.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Franczyk, Federal Trade 
Commission, Chicago Regional Office, 55 East Monroe St., Suite 1860, 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chicago, IL. 60603. (312) 353-8156,

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Monday, April 1, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register 61 FR 14311, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Brian Coryat, for the purpose 
of soliciting public comment. Interested parties were given sixty (60) 
days in which to submit comments, suggestions or objections regarding 
the proposed form of the order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to cease and 
desist, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

    (Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46, Interprets or applies sec. 
5, 38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2433 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
```
COURT OF CHANCERY

OF THE

S AM G LASS C OCK III

V ICE C HANCELLOR STATE OF DELAWARE C OURT OF C HANCERY C OURTHOUSE

34 T HE C IRCLE

G EORGETOWN

, D ELAWARE 19947

November 5, 2019

A. Thompson Bayliss

Adam K. Schulman

Abrams & Bayliss LLP

20 Montchanin Road, Suite 200

Wilmington, DE 19807 T. Brad Davey

Andrew H. Sauder

Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP

1313 N. Market Street

Wilmington, DE 19899

RE : Robert O. Carr v. Global Payments Inc. and Heartland Payment

Systems, LLC ; C .A. No. 2018

- 0565

- SG; Motion for Reargument

Date Submitted: November 4 , 2019

Date Decided: November 5 , 2019

Dear Counsel:

Before me is Plaintiff’s Motion for Reargument . The matter involves an

advancement claim. I began the Memorandum Opinion under consideration by

noting that such actions are often redolent of buyer’s remorse. Any judicial decision

granting a motion for reargument must be a subject of unqualified jud icial remorse.

This is such a decision.

My Memorandum Opinion of October 31, 2019 contains a basic and

substantial error of fact. Upon review of the Plaintiff’s Motion, it is clear that it must

be withdrawn, which is the object of this Letter Order. Wh ether, and to what extent,

the rectification of the error requires a substantive change in the outcome of the2 advancement issue therein addressed awaits briefing on the Motion for Reargument,

but it is clear that regardless of that ultimate outcome, the Me morandum Opinion

should be, and hereby is, withdrawn.

I take exception to one assertion made in Plaintiff’s Motion. He blames the

error in the Memorandum Opinion on the Defendants. That assertion is misplaced.

Responsibility rests solely with the finde r of fact, the author of the Memorandum

Opinion.

My Memorandum Opinion of October 31, 2019 is WITHDRAWN.

To the extent the foregoing requires an order to take effect, it is SO

ORDERED.

Sincerely

,

/s/ Sam Glasscock III

Sam Glasscock III
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2132 

To include Idaho and Montana as affected areas for purposes of making 

claims under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 

note) based on exposure to atmospheric nuclear testing. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 16, 2005 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. BURNS, and Mr. CRAIG) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To include Idaho and Montana as affected areas for purposes 

of making claims under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note) based on exposure 

to atmospheric nuclear testing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF IDAHO AND MONTANA IN RADI4 ATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION. 

5 Section 4(b)(1) of the Radiation Exposure Com6 pensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note) is amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

8 after the semicolon; 
2 

•S 2132 IS 

1 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

2 after the semicolon; and 

3 (3) by adding after subparagraph (C) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(D) the State of Idaho; and 

6 ‘‘(E) the State of Montana; and’’. 

Æ
mmpw_ex101.htm

  EXHIBIT 10.1
 
PROMISSORY NOTE
 
	As of November 6, 2015 
	$250,000



 
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, (the "Maker"), hereby promises to pay to the order of C. Lawrence Rutstein (the "Payee"), the principal sum of $250,000 pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein.
 
PAYMENT OF PRINCIPAL. The principal amount of this Promissory Note (the "Note") and any accrued but unpaid interest shall be due and payable at the earlier to occur of: 1) 180 days from the date hereof and; 2) the consummation of a financing by Maker with gross proceeds to the Company of no less than $1,000,000.
 
INTEREST. This Note shall bear interest at a rate of 8% per annum accruing from the date hereof and payable to the Payee on a monthly basis.
 
PREPAYMENT. The Maker shall have the right at any time and from time to time to prepay this Note in whole or in part without premium or penalty.
 
REMEDIES. No delay or omission on part of the holder of this Note in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any such right or of any other right of such holder, nor shall any delay, omission or waiver on any one occasion be deemed a bar to or waiver of the same or any other right on any future occasion. The rights and remedies of the Payee shall be cumulative and may be pursued singly, successively, or together, in the sole discretion of the Payee.
 
GOVERNING LAW. This Note shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Florida.
 
SUCCESSORS: All of the foregoing is the promise to Maker and shall bind Maker and Maker's successors, heirs and assigns; provided, however, that Maker may not assign any of its rights or delegate any of its obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the holder of this Note.
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker has executed this Promissory Note as of the day and year first above written.
 
	 	 	 	 
		MAKER:	/s/ Bobby Bliar	 

	 
		Multimedia Platforms, Inc.	 

	 
	 
	Bobby Blair, Chief Executive Officer	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	PAYEE: 
	/s/ C. Lawrence Rutstein 
	 

	 
	 
	C. Lawrence Rutstein
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23461]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33446]


City of Anacortes--Acquisition and Operation Exemption--The 
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

    The City of Anacortes (City),\1\ a noncarrier, has filed a verified 
notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire from The Burlington 
Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and to operate approximately 3.98 
miles of rail line known as the Anacortes Branch from its endpoint at 
milepost 0.0, in Anacortes, to milepost 3.98, near Fidalgo, in Skagit 
County, WA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ City is a political subdivision of the State of Washington.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on or after the 
August 20, 1997 effective date of the exemption.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to reopen the proceeding to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33446, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Charles H. Montange, 426 NW 162d Street, Seattle, WA 98177.

    Decided: August 28, 1997.

By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23461 Filed 9-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
#### Dera R. CONWAY, individually, and as Administratrix c. t. a. of the Estate of J. M. Conway, Jr., Appellants, v. PLOWDEN & ROBERTS, INC., a foreign corporation, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, a foreign corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 70-17.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 20, 1970.

Rehearing Denied May 25, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Publicatieblad C 93I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0995 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 093I |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 64e jaargang19 maart 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0995

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 093I

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

64e jaargang19 maart 2021

---

| Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- |
| | Rectificaties |
| | Rectificatie van de gezamenlijke verklaring van het Europees Parlement, de Raad en de Europese Commissie over de Conferentie over de toekomst van Europa In dialoog met de burger voor meer democratie — Bouwen aan een veerkrachtiger Europa ( PB C 91 I van 18.3.2021 ) | 1 |

Inhoud

Bladzijde

Rectificaties

Rectificatie van de gezamenlijke verklaring van het Europees Parlement, de Raad en de Europese Commissie over de Conferentie over de toekomst van Europa In dialoog met de burger voor meer democratie — Bouwen aan een veerkrachtiger Europa ( PB C 91 I van 18.3.2021 )

( PB C 91 I van 18.3.2021 )

1

---

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

Rectificaties

| 19.3.2021 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | CI 93/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2021

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

CI 93/1

---

Rectificatie van de gezamenlijke verklaring van het Europees Parlement, de Raad en de Europese Commissie over de Conferentie over de toekomst van Europa In dialoog met de burger voor meer democratie — Bouwen aan een veerkrachtiger Europa

(
  Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie C 91 I van 18 maart 2021
  )

(2021/C 93 I/01)

In de inhoudsopgave en op bladzijde 1, in de hoofding:

in plaats van:

“EUROPEES PARLEMENT”,

lezen:

“EUROPEES PARLEMENT

RAAD

EUROPESE COMMISSIE”.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000943904
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND V L.P., SERIES 3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460 

August 14, 2014 

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

PC Code: 061603 

MEMORANDUM DP Barcode: 415810 

SUBJECT: Paraquat: Drinking Water Exposure Assessment for Petition on Tuberous 

and Corm Subgroup 1 C 

FROM: James 

ERB2/EFE

Lin, 

D 

Environmental 

(7507P) 

Engine~ 

~ 

REVIEWED B¥Jt ( Jean Holmes, Risk Assessment Process Leader £.?--

\ ERB2/EFED (7507P) ~ ~ 

THROUGH: 

TO: 

Brian 

ERB2/

Anderson, 

EFED (7507P) 

Chief (>r'-/ ~ 

Andrew Ertman, Risk Manager 

Barbara Madden, Team Leader 

RIMUERBIRD (7505P) 

. This memo provides estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWC) of paraquat in surface 

water for supporting paraquat use on the tuberous and corm subgroup 1 C. Based on the review 

of a non-guideline supplemental study to evaluate the effects of traditional water treatment 

processes on paraquat (DP396402)1

, EFED has concluded that the level of paraquat in the finish 

water ofO.lS J.lg/L should be used in both acute and chronic assessments for the drinking water 

purpose. 

1 DP 396402. Review of Jar Test Results for Drinking Water Assessment Purpose, January I 0, 2012.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Mind2Market,   Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
James Clark,  CEO of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ James Clark
                                         --------------------------------
                                         James Clark, CEO

Dated: August 24, 2004
#### ADAMSON v. WILHELM.

No. 39123.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FORM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10Q OF AUTOWEB.COM, INC.
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPT 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          31,749
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,291
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,145
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,526
<PP&E>                                           6,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,741
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,120
<SALES>                                         28,829
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,495
<CGS>                                            4,732
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                62,952
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  74
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (24,008)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (24,008)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.86


</TABLE>
1

Plaintiff is currently housed in the Victorville Medium

Federal Correctional Institution, Adelanto, Ca. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LARRY JOHN KELLY, :

:

Plaintiff : No. 4:CV-05-0480

:

vs. : (Complaint Filed 03/08/05)

:

: (Judge Muir)

Mr. Tanner, et al., :

:

Defendants :

ORDER

April 29, 2005

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

On April 9, 2003, plaintiff, Larry John Kelly, initiated a

civil rights action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in the United

States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. See

Kelly v. DeHaven, Civil Action No. 1:03-CV-0206 (E.D. Texas

2003). On June 16, 2003, plaintiff was transferred to the

Allenwood United States Penitentiary, White Deer (“USPAllenwood”), Pennsylvania.1 On June 1, 2004, plaintiff filed a

document entitled “amendment to plaintiff’s motion to amend

complaint.” In this document plaintiff requested that the Texas

Case 4:05-cv-00480-MM-DB Document 4 Filed 04/29/05 Page 1 of 3
2

District Court incorporate two employees of USP-Allenwood as

additional defendants in his present action. Because the

amendment involved persons who were strangers to the existing

action, and therefore did not relate back to plaintiff’s

original action, see FED.R.CIV.P. 15(c)(2), the Texas District

Court, by Order dated February 28, 2005, determined plaintiff’s

amendment to be a new cause of action, severed the defendants

from the plaintiff’s pending action, and transferred the

plaintiff’s “amendment” to the United States District Court for

the Middle District, where it was filed on March 8, 2005, as a

civil rights action. Plaintiff's action, however, was unable to

proceed without the payment of the required filing fee or the

filing of the forms required to proceed in forma pauperis.

By Order dated March 21, 2005, plaintiff was informed that

his case would be dismissed without prejudice unless, within

thirty (30) days, he either paid the statutory filing fee of

$250.00 or filed a properly completed application to proceed in

forma pauperis and authorization form. (Doc. No. 2).

Notwithstanding this admonition, thirty (30) days have elapsed

and the plaintiff has neither made an appropriate submission nor

requested an extension of time within which to do so. 

Case 4:05-cv-00480-MM-DB Document 4 Filed 04/29/05 Page 2 of 3
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The action is dismissed without prejudice. 

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this

case. 

3. Any appeal from this order will be deemed

frivolous, not taken in good faith and

lacking probable cause. 

s/Malcolm Muir

 

MUIR

United States District Judge

MM:dlb

Case 4:05-cv-00480-MM-DB Document 4 Filed 04/29/05 Page 3 of 3