alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1858 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1858

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
                To provide for community disaster loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Disaster Loan Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. DISASTER LOANS.

    (a) Essential Services.--Of the amounts provided in Public Law 109-
62 for ``Disaster Relief'', up to $750,000,000 may be transferred to 
the Disaster Assistance Direct Loan Program for the cost of direct 
loans as authorized under section 417 of the Robert T. Stafford 
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5184) to be 
used to assist local governments in providing essential services: 
Provided, That such transfer may be made to subsidize gross obligations 
for the principal amount of direct loans not to exceed $1,000,000,000 
under section 417 of the Stafford Act: Provided further, That 
notwithstanding section 417(b) of the Stafford Act, the amount of any 
such loan issued pursuant to this section may exceed $5,000,000: 
Provided further, That notwithstanding section 417(c)(1) of the 
Stafford Act, such loans may not be canceled: Provided further, That 
the cost of modifying such loans shall be as defined in section 502 of 
the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 661a).
    (b) Administrative Expenses.--Of the amounts provided in Public Law 
109-62 for ``Disaster Relief'', up to $1,000,000 may be transferred to 
the Disaster Assistance Direct Loan Program for administrative expenses 
to carry out the direct loan program, as authorized by section 417 of 
the Stafford Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23762]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3914-000]


Commonwealth Electric Company; Notice of Filing

September 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 26, 1997, Commonwealth Electric Company 
tendered for filing its quarterly report of transactions for the period 
April 1, 1997 through June 30, 1997.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedures (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before September 16, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23762 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 00-7350.

#### Collins *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6247
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MUKAILAN TRUMP ASHRUE, a/k/a Mark, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-89-276, CA-97-243-2) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 2, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mukailan Trump Ashrue, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ashrue , Nos. CR-89-276; CA-97-243-2 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 1997).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Ex parte ANONYMOUS.

SC 77-138.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 22, 1977.

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER, AL-MON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
Case 4:05-cr-00196-JEJ Document 39 Filed 02/21/06 Page 1 of 6
Case 4:05-cr-00196-JEJ Document 39 Filed 02/21/06 Page 2 of 6
Case 4:05-cr-00196-JEJ Document 39 Filed 02/21/06 Page 3 of 6
Case 4:05-cr-00196-JEJ Document 39 Filed 02/21/06 Page 4 of 6
Case 4:05-cr-00196-JEJ Document 39 Filed 02/21/06 Page 5 of 6
Case 4:05-cr-00196-JEJ Document 39 Filed 02/21/06 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Paul V. Maier, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Sequenom, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Quarterly
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d), of the Exchange Act, and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification
accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Quarterly Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 5th day of August, 2010.



/s/ PAUL V. MAIERPaul V. MaierChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Raymond THOMPSON, Appellee.

No. 77-1553.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 28, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 4, 1978.

*429Michael J. Satz, State’s Atty., William W. Herring and Patti Englander, Asst. State’s Attys., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Fred Haddad of Sandstrom & Haddad, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

LETTS, Judge.

The State takes this appeal pursuant to Chapter 924.071 Fla.Stat. (1975), from an order suppressing evidence by reason of a defective search warrant. We reverse.

Having once successfully appealed a criminal conviction, a defendant is *not*entitled, during a new trial, to again raise matters previously expressly passed upon and found to be without merit by the appellate court.

Appellant was originally convicted of possession of both cocaine and marijuana and based his first appeal to this court on several grounds. In reversing the convictions, and ordering a new trial, Judge Owen said:

> “Of the several points he urges as error on appeal, WE FIND MERIT IN ONLY ONE, that relating to improper and prejudicial remarks made by the prosecutor in his closing argument to the jury.” (Emphasis supplied). *Thompson v. State,*318 So.2d 549, 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

One of the points raised in that appeal was that:

> “THE COURT ERRED BY HOLDING THE SEARCH WARRANT TO BE VALID AND IN ALLOWING INTO EVIDENCE ITEMS SEIZED FROM A PREMISE NOT DESCRIBED IN THE WARRANT.”

Under the heading of the above quoted point on appeal, the appellant argued, in particular, that the wording of the warrant was insufficient to permit a search of the curtilage. This is exactly the same argument which he successfully raised again during the new trial.

*430In our opinion, by finding that only one point on appeal had merit, Judge Owen affirmatively rejected the argument that this warrant was invalid. This being so, the question of its validity became the law of the case. Accordingly, it was error for the trial judge, during the pendency of the new proceedings, to grant a motion to suppress the evidence seized, because of the insufficiency of the very same warrant.

REVERSED AND REMANDED IN ACCORDANCE HEREWITH.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and MOORE, J., concur.
### Freshwater heads and ground-water temperatures in aquifers of the Northern Great Plains in parts of Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming

By: D.H. Lobmeyer

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1402D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Federal Register: October 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 209)]
[Notices]               
[Page 66761]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29oc10-68]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2010-0049]

 
Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: EIB 10-01A Long Term Transaction Questionnaire; EIB 10-
01B Oil and Gas Company Questionnaire.

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (``Ex-Im Bank'') 
is the official export credit agency of the United States. Its mission 
is to create and sustain U.S. jobs by financing U.S. exports through 
direct loans, guarantees, insurance and working capital credit. The 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117) (``the 
Act''), enacted December 16, 2009, provides for Ex-Im Bank's FY2010 
budget authorization. As part of the U.S. government's efforts to 
strengthen sanctions against Iran, the Act contains language 
prohibiting Ex-Im Bank from:

    Authoriz[ing] any new guarantee, insurance, or extension of 
credit for any project controlled by an energy producer or refiner 
that continues to: (A) Provide Iran with significant refined 
petroleum resources; (B) materially contribute to Iran's capability 
to import refined petroleum resources; or (C) allow Iran to maintain 
or expand, in any material respect, its domestic production of 
refined petroleum resources, including any assistance in refinery 
construction, modernization, or repair.

See Sec. 7043 of the Act.
    The Act is effectively immediately and applies to all 
authorizations Ex-Im Bank may make with FY2010 funds.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before November 29, 2010 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments maybe submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Office of Management & Budget, Office 
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20038 attn: OMB 3048-0030.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 10-01A Long Term Transaction 
Questionnaire; EIB 10-01B Oil and Gas Company Questionnaire.
    OMB Number: 3048-0030.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: This is a new collection to ensure compliance with 
the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), enacted 
December 16, 2009.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-27428 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BRYAN SMITH, : 4:CV-04-1746

Plaintiff : (Judge McClure)

v. : (Magistrate Judge Smyser)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, :

Commissioner of Social Security,

:

Defendant

O R D E R

 May 11, 2005

BACKGROUND: 

The plaintiff has brought this civil action under the authority of 42 U.S.C. 

§ 405(g) to obtain judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social

Security denying the claim of the plaintiff for Social Security disability insurance

benefits.

The case was initially referred to United States Magistrate Judge J. Andrew

Smyser. 

Magistrate Judge Smyser filed an eleven page report and recommendation on

April 21, 2005. He concluded with the recommendation that the case be remanded

to the Commissioner for further consideration of the plaintiff under Listing 1.04 A,

consideration of Dr. Cartaginise’s opinion without assuming a motivation on the

Case 4:04-cv-01746-JFM Document 16 Filed 05/11/05 Page 1 of 2
2

Doctor’s part that lacks evidentiary support, and consideration of the plaintiff’s

credibility that is framed in terms of the truthfulness of things that he has said. 

On May 10, 2005, the Commissioner waived the opportunity to object to the

report and recommendation. 

The court agrees with the analysis of the magistrate judge and his

recommendation and will order a remand. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

J. Andrew Smyser (record document no. 14, filed April 21, 2005) is approved and

adopted in full for the reasons set forth therein. 

2. The case is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for

additional consideration of the plaintiff under Listing 1.04 A, consideration of Dr.

Cartaginise’s opinion without assuming a motivation on the Doctor’s part that lacks

evidentiary support, and consideration of the plaintiff’s credibility that is framed in

terms of the truthfulness of things that he has said. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the case file. 

 s/ James F. McClure, Jr. 

James F. McClure, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-01746-JFM Document 16 Filed 05/11/05 Page 2 of 2
256 La. 251

#### MARYLAND NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Honorable Jim GARRISON, District Attorney in and for the Parish of Orleans et al.

No. 50566.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Maryland National Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 233 So.2d 32.

Writ refused. On the facts shown, the result is correct.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Richard D. PENNINGTON.

No. 60488.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 2, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana through the District Attorney, Harry Connick applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ denied. This court will not exercise its supervisory jurisdiction absent a showing of an error of law. La. C.C.Pr. art. 858.
# Pairing learners with leaders 

/ Published April 6, 2018
FORT BELVOIR, Va., 
Curious about what she could learn from senior leaders, Rachel Dunlap became the fourth participant to sign up for the Defense Logistics Agency Energy Shadow Program.

She selected DLA Energy Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Martin Chapin to follow for the week of March 12-16. Dunlap is the first government civilian to shadow the brigadier general.

Dunlap, the DLA Energy Business Process Support Directorate’s Reports and Analysis Division chief and 13-year DLA Energy employee, said she seized the opportunity to get more insight and gain an understanding of the responsibilities, interactions and perspectives of the leaders at the top of the organization.  

The shadow program, developed as part of DLA Energy’s mentoring program, provides its workforce with another opportunity to manage their career objectives, said Strategic Communications Group Strategic Analyst Consondra Christopher-Davis. 

Shadow experiences span three to five days and offer multiple levels of leadership observations since employees may shadow any leader within the organization, she added. 

Hand-in-hand with the DLA People and Culture Plan, the DLA Energy Commander’s strategic focus areas is on managing talent and developing future leaders. 

“The important thing to me is a two-way program,” Chapin said. “The shadow gets to observe and gain understandings of senior-level management and leaders gain perspective from the shadow as well.” 

Dunlap attended progress reviews focused on the preparation for a visit by the Honorable Robert McMahon, assistant secretary of defense for logistics and materiel readiness. 

“The VIP visit was excellent,” she said. “I was able to see a portion of the preparation for the visit and the execution of the presentation was and questions generated. It will help me in the future to develop presentations for senior leaders.”  

Dunlap attended end of the day wrap-ups with Chapin, DLA Energy Deputy Commander Guy Beougher, and DLA Energy Chief of Staff Army Col. Doug Henry, where they discussed ongoing events and challenges. 

“I included Rachel and asked her opinion to get her insight about the engagements,” Chapin said. “I’ve gained good insight into teleworking and other topics while talking with my shadow.”

Dunlap said each day was unique and dynamic, but the candid one-on-one discussion she and Chapin had between meetings were the best part. 

“I absolutely accomplished what I hoped to,” she said. “I will be able to apply some of the lessons learned to my daily job such as organizational techniques, strategic focus and meetings with a purpose, and I’ve gained an understanding of some of the current operations here.” 

While Dunlap is the first to shadow Chapin, Chris Boeding shadowed Beougher and Callie Lake shadowed Kevin Ahern earlier this year.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23928]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-86-000]


Pacific Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

September 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, Pacific Gas Transmission 
Company (PGT) tendered for filing for filing and acceptance Eighteenth 
Revised Sheet No. 4, Ninth Revised Sheet No. 4A, Fourth Revised Sheet 
No. 5A, and Eighth Revised Sheet No. 6C to be included in its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1-A and Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 7 
to be included in its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, to 
become effective October 1, 1997.
    PGT asserts that the purpose of this filing is to reflect a 
modification to the Annual Charge Adjustment fee, in accordance with 
the Commission's most recent Annual Charge billing to PGT. PGT further 
states that a copy of this filing has been served upon all 
jurisdictional customers and upon interested state regulatory agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or protest said filing should file 
a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 
and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All 
such motions or protests must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 
of the Commission's regulations. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23928 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M