alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Summary of data on chemical quality of streams of North Carolina, 1943-67

By: Hugh B. WilderLarry J. Slack

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1895B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Federal Register: September 17, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 180)]
[Notices]               
[Page 57102]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17se10-148]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7174]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Titian and the Golden Age of Venetian Painting: 
Masterpieces from the National Galleries of Scotland''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Titian and the Golden Age of Venetian 
Painting: Masterpieces from the National Galleries of Scotland,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the High Museum of 
Art, Atlanta, GA, from on or about October 16, 2010, until on or about 
January 2, 2011; at the Minneapolis Institute of Arts, Minneapolis, MN, 
from on or about February 6, 2011 to on or about May 1, 2011; at the 
Museum of Fine Arts, Houston, TX, from on or about May 21, 2011, to on 
or about August 14, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice 
of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: September 9, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-23284 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
2008 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

10-17-2008

In Re: Emmett Nelson

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 08-3820

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Emmett Nelson " (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 350.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/350
1

HLD-161 (September 2008) NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 08-3820

 

IN RE: EMMETT NELSON,

 Petitioner

 

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(Related to D.C. Civil No. 3:07-cv-00071)

 

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

September 30, 2008

Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, WEIS AND GARTH, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: October 17, 2008)

 

OPINION

 

PER CURIAM.

On March 27, 2007, Petitioner Emmett Nelson, a federal prisoner

proceeding pro se, petitioned the District Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2241, challenging the computation of his federal sentence. The District Judge

referred the petition to a Magistrate Judge. On September 5, 2008, Nelson petitioned this

Court for a writ of mandamus, requesting an order compelling the District Court to act
2

upon his habeas petition. On September 11, 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report

recommending denial of Nelson’s habeas petition. On September 29, 2008, the District

Court adopted the Report and denied Nelson’s petition. Given that Nelson has now

received the relief he seeks in his mandamus petition – a ruling on his habeas petition –

we will deny his mandamus petition, along with his motion for appointment of counsel, as

moot.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1445 Referred in House (RFH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1445

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2006

             Referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 520 Colorado Avenue in Arriba, Colorado, as the ``William H. Emery 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WILLIAM H. EMERY POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 520 Colorado Avenue in Arriba, Colorado, shall be known and 
designated as the ``William H. Emery Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William H. 
Emery Post Office''.

            Passed the Senate March 3, 2006.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Ju ly 19 , 2011

Meeting Agenda

En dangered Species C onsultation and Biological Opinion

R e garding the Effects of Oryzalin on Pacific Salmonids

USEPA Potomac Yards One

Room S

- 9100

2 :00 pm

I. Opening Remarks and Introductions

II. Bac kground

III. NMFS Presentation

IV. Applicant Pres e n t at ion

V. Discussion, Summary, and Next Steps

NOTES :
#### Randy RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-326.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 4, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 8, 1969.

Carr & Emory, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Chavers v. State, Fla.1950, 45 So.2d 180; Herring v. State, 131 Fla. 627, 180 So. 15 (1938); and Fla.R.Cr.Pr. 1.510, 1.530 and 1.570, 33 F.S.A.
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF LeCROY CORPORATION



|                                       |  |                      
|-------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                     |  | JurisdictionOrganized
|LeCroy Corporation*                    |  | Delaware             
|LeCroy Lightspeed Corporation          |  | Delaware             
|Computer Access Technology Corporation |  | Delaware             
|Catalyst Enterprises, Inc.             |  | California           
|LeCroy, S.A.R.L.                       |  | France               
|LeCroy, GmbH                           |  | Germany              
|LeCroy (Beijing) Trading Co., Ltd.     |  | China                
|LeCroy, S.R.L.                         |  | Italy                
|LeCroy Japan Corporation               |  | Japan                
|LeCroy, Pte. Ltd.                      |  | Singapore            
|LeCroy Korea, Ltd.                     |  | South Korea          
|LeCroy AB                              |  | Sweden               
|LeCroy, S.A.                           |  | Switzerland          
|LeCroy, Ltd.                           |  | United Kingdom       



|* | Parent
|- | ------
Lower Florida Keys Refuges 

Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan

Florida Keys National Wildlife Refuges Complex

28950 Watson Boulevard

Big Pine Key, FL 33043

Telephone: (305) 872-2239

Email: keydeer@fws.gov

Website: http://www.fws.gov/nationalkeydeer

May 2008

August 2005
#### Donald Harris BLACK, Jr. v. DANIEL ORNAMENTAL IRON COMPANY.

Civ. 1178.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

Aug. 24, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 28, 1977.

E. L. Brobston, Bessemer, for appellant.

W. Gerald Stone, Stone, Patton & Kierce, Bessemer, for appellee.

*576WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

This is a workmen’s compensation case.

This case originally came to this court on appeal by Daniel Ornamental Iron Co. from a judgment which awarded compensation to Donald Black for a permanent partial disability. This court reversed the aspect of the judgment awarding compensation. That decision is reported as *Daniel Ornamental Iron Company, Inc. v. Black,*47 Ala.App. 608, 259 So.2d 291.

The issue there was whether the trial court could enter a judgment granting compensation for permanent partial disability after entering a finding of fact that the claimant’s refusal to submit to further examination and indicated surgical procedure was unreasonable. Our decision was that there could be no judgment granting compensation in that case where there was an unreasonable refusal to submit to request for examination or for subsequent medical treatment found to be needed. The claimant did not appeal from the finding of fact by the court that he had unreasonably refused examination and treatment.

Our decision clearly was a reversal only as to the granting of compensation. The finding of fact that claimant had unreasonably refused examination and treatment remained in effect. Title 26, § 293, Code of Alabama (1940) (Recomp.1958), requires that his right to compensation be suspended and no compensation paid during such refusal. Because of the statute, so long as such refusal continued, there was nothing further to be done. We remanded the case, not for retrial of the issue of fact for that had been determined, but merely to place it back in the jurisdiction of the circuit court. Claimant could have then submitted to examination or treatment, or he could have presented pleadings as to change of circumstances since the previous trial which might support modification. In any event, so long as the status of unreasonable refusal existed, the suspension of payments was according to statute.

We have held that during the period of unreasonable refusal benefits are forever lost. *Scott v. Alabama Machinery & Supply Co.,*52 Ala.App. 459, 296 So.2d 160 (1972). The court found the unreasonable refusal by decree of January 16, 1970. There had been no action by claimant whatsoever since that date to secure relief from the statutory suspension prior to the filing of motion for summary judgment by Daniel on January 20, 1977. The ground of the motion was that the maximum time during which claimant could have drawn compensation (300 weeks) had expired during suspension and he was no longer eligible for payment. Under authority of the decision in the first appeal in this case and of *Scott v. Ala. Machinery & Supply Co., supra,*the judgment below is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

BRADLEY and HOLMES, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Buford McDaniel.

No. 60986.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 15, 1978.

F. Clay Tillman, Jr., Tillman & Mitchell, Leesville, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., William C. Pe-gues, III, Dist. Atty., William E. Tilley, First Asst. Dist. Atty., Edwin L. Cabra, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DIXON, J., dissents. See, La., 340 So.2d 242, 247.

CALOGERO, J., dissents.
Amendment to Sublease Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO COMMERCIAL SUBLEASE 

This Amendment to Commercial Sublease (“Amendment”) is made by, eGain Corporation
(“Sublandlord”) and Adesto Technologies Corporation (“Subtenant”), this 2nd day of November 2015 (“Amendment Date”). 

RECITALS: 

A. Sublandlord is subleasing to Subtenant the premises at 1250 Borregas Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94089 (“Sublease
Premises”) in accordance with that Commercial Sublease dated May 2015, as amended, (“Sublease”). 

B. This subtenancy is subject to all the terms and conditions of the Original Lease dated May 9, 2011 (“Original
Lease”) between D.R. Stephens (“Landlord”), and eGain Corporation (“Tenant”) and the Original Lease, as amended (“Lease”). 

C. The dates pertaining to eGain’s rent abatement and Tenant Improvements from Landlord are hereby amended to accommodate the six month
sublease and are accordingly pushed out six months. 
 D. Subtenant will do nothing and will not fail to take any action that will create a
breach by Sublandlord as Tenant, of any of the terms or conditions of the Lease. 
  

	1.	Term of Sublease 

 The term of the Sublease is hereby extended to July 31, 2016.

  

	2.	Rent 

 Base Rent: $47,087.15 per month beginning on February 5, 2016. Base Rent for
the first month beginning on February 5, 2016 to be prorated for the 25 days of the Sublease extension term beginning February 5, 2016 for such period will be in the amount of $40,592.37 for such 25 day period. 

 

	3.	Security Deposit 

 Subtenant will deposit an additional $14,235.65 on the start of the
extension term for a total security deposit of $47,087.15 when added to the existing security deposit in the amount of $32,851.50 with Sublandlord as security for Subtenant’s performance of this Sublease. Sublandlord will refund this security
deposit to Subtenant at the end of the Sublease if Subtenant returns the Sublease Premises in the original condition, except any normal wear and tear, and Subtenant has paid Sublandlord all sums due under this sublease. Otherwise, Sublandlord may
deduct any amounts required to place the Sublease Premises in good condition and to pay any sums due under the Sublease. 
  

	4.	Interpretation 

 In the event of any conflict between any provision of this
Amendment and any other provision of this Sublease, the provision of this Sublease shall govern and take precedence. 

  
 1 









									
	 By:
	 	 Charles Messman
	 	Title:	 	 VP of Finance



 

									
	 Signature:
	 	 /s/ Charles Messman
	 	Date:	 	 11/2/2015



Adesto Technologies 
  

									
	By:	 	 Ron Shelton
	 	Title:	 	 CFO



 

									
	Signature:	 	 /s/ Ron Shelton
	 	Date:	 	 11/2/2015


 D.R. Stephens 
  

									
	By:	 	 Lane Stephen
	 	Title:	 	 Manager



 

									
	Signature:	 	 /s/ Lane Stephen
	 	Date:	 	 11/2/2015



  
 2
### Surface-water hydrology of coastal basins of northern California

By: S. E. Rantz

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1758

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Surface-water hydrology of coastal basins in northern California(1955)                                    

                                        Surface-water hydrology of small basins in California between Russian and Eel Rivers(1957)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of *Diatom
      Corporation* ,
      a
      Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      "Report"), I, Russ
      George, President/Director of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
      U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      November 3, 2005




/s/Russ
        George
 Russ
        George
 president/director












**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
        ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of *Diatom
        Corporation* ,
        a
        Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
        September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
        "Report"), I, Tobey
        Thatcher, Secretary/Director of
        the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
        U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
  (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:
        November 3, 2005




/s/Tobey
        Thatcher Tobey
        Thatcher
 Secretary/Director















**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of *Diatom
      Corporation* ,
      a
      Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      "Report"), I, J.
      Dan
      Sifford former
      Sole Officer/Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      November 3, 2005


/s/J.
        Dan Sifford
 J.
        Dan Sifford
 former
        Sole
        Officer/Director
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Source Interlink Companies, Inc.
Bonita Springs, Florida

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-16039, 333-64082, 333-64080, 333-107420 and
333-123330) and Form S-3 (No. 333-118655) of Source Interlink Companies, Inc.
(the "Company") of our reports dated April 8, 2005, relating to the consolidated
financial statements, financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of
Source Interlink Companies, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting
which appears in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                                       /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
Chicago, Illinois
April 18, 2005
**Exhibit
99.5**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**
 **PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Algoma Steel Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
40-F for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Denis Turcotte,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
  1.
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  By:
    “*Denis
      Turcotte*”Denis
      TurcottePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
 
 March
20, 2005