alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-3664

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Tracy Allan Lennex, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 7, 2009 Filed: April 10, 2009

___________ Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BYE and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Tracy Allan Lennex pleaded guilty to be ing a felon in possession of a firearm. In calculating his Guidelines sentencing range, the district court 1 determined that Lennex had two prior felony c onvictions that qualified as crimes of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a), including one Missour i conviction for “knowingly burning or exploding,” see Mo. Rev. Stat. § 569.055 (person commits crime of knowingly burning or exploding when he knowingly dama ges property of another by starting fire or causing explosion). The court sentenced him to 90 months in prison. Lennex-2- appeals, arguing that his prior convicti on for knowingly burning or exploding does not constitute a crime of violence and that his sentence is unreasonable.

We conclude that the district court properly characterized Lennex’s prior conviction for knowingly burning or exploding as a crime of violence. See United States v. Whaley , 552 F.3d 904, 907 (8th Cir. 2009) ( holding that Missouri conviction for knowingly burning or exploding constitutes violent felony for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), as elements substantially correspond to those of generic arson, and offense is punishable by term of imprisonm ent exceeding one year); United States v. Williams , 537 F.3d 969, 971 (8th Cir. 2008) (this court has never recognized distinction between “violent felony” and “crime of violence”); see also United States v. Hollis , 447 F.3d 1053, 1054 (8th Cir. 2006) (p er curiam) (court reviews de novo whether prior conviction is crime of violen ce under § 4B1.2(a)). We further conclude that Lennex’s within-Guidelines-range sentence was not unreasonable. See United States v. Akers , 476 F.3d 602, 605 (8th Cir. 2007) (reviewing reasonableness of sentence under abuse-of-discretion st andard); United States v. Watson , 480 F.3d 1175, 1177 (8th Cir.) (describing circumstances where sentencing court abuses its discretion and imposes unreasonable sentence; within-Guidelines-range sentence is presumptively reasonable), cert. denied , 128 S. Ct. 305 (2007). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOptical measurement of propeller blade deflectionsA nonintrusive optical method for measurement of propeller blade deflections is described and evaluated. It does not depend on the reflectivity of the blade surface but only on its opaqueness. Deflection of a point at the leading edge and a point at the trailing edge in a plane nearly perpendicular to the pitch axis is obtained using a single light beam generated by a low-power helium-neon laser. Quantitative analyses are performed from taped signals on a digital computer. Averaging techniques are employed to reduce random errors. Measured deflections from a static and a high-speed test are compared with available predicted deflections which are also used to evaluate systematic errors.Document ID19880018902Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsKurkov, Anatole P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 8, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1988Subject CategoryInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberE-4131NASA-TP-2841NAS 1.60:2841Accession Number88N28286Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 535-03-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880018902.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000405

16-JUL-2014

07:53 AM
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 5103

_____________________________ C HARLES L ITTON M ORRIS ,
Petitioner
,

v.

F LORIDA D EPARTMENT OF C ORRECTIONS , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

— Original Jurisdiction

.

April 2, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

R OBERTS , R AY , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Charles Litton Morris, pro se
, Petitioner

. Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
#### Joseph TOTH, Appellant, v. Roderick Albert HUNT, Jr., Appellee.

No. 69-494.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Aug. 18, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Hugh MacMillan, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Silicon Mountain Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors
and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
   Date: April 15, 2009
    /s/ Dennis W. ClarkDennis W. Clark,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 194 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 194

 To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to permit 
                 the planting of chicory on base acres.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2005

   Mr. Nelson of Nebraska (for himself and Mr. Enzi) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to permit 
                 the planting of chicory on base acres.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLANTING OF CHICORY ON BASE ACRES.

    Section 1106(b)(3)(B) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act 
of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 7916(b)(3)(B)) is amended by striking ``and dry 
peas'' and inserting ``dry peas, and chicory''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.1 for International Energy Consultants Inc.




Exhibit 10.1


                                 GENERAL RELEASE

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of International Energy Consultants (IEC), a
Nevada Corporation, and the Board of Directors of Purezza Group Inc.,
("Purezza"), a Florida corporation approved an Agreement and Plan ofShare
Exchange between IEC and Purezza on October 3, 2001.

WHEREAS, IEC and Purezza have decided it is in the best interests of both
parties not to proceed with the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and
Plan of Share Exchange.

Now therefore, in exchange for good and valuable consideration the receipt of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

Each party HEREBY remises releases, acquits, satisfies, and forever discharge
the said other party of and from all and all manner of action and actions,
cause and causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of money accounts,
reckonings, bonds, bills, specialties, covenants, controversies, agreements,
promises, variances, trespasses, damages, judgments, executions, claims and
demands whatsoever, in law or in equity which said party of the first part ever
had, now has, or which any personal representative, successor, heir or assign of
said party of the first part, hereafter can shall or may have against said party
of the second part, for, upon, or by reason of any matter, cause or thing
whatsoever, from the beginning of the world to the day of these presents.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto set my hand and seal, this 20th day of
December 2001.

Purezza Group Inc.

/s/ Larry Legal 
By: Larry Legal President


International Energy Consultants Inc.

/s/ Tony Sanzari 
By:Tony Sanzari President
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47690-47691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Gas Utilization Research Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 24, 1997, pursaunt to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Gas Utilization Research Forum 
(``GURG'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damage under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Statoil, Stavanger, NORWAY, has become a new member of 
GURF.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and GURF intends to file additional 
written notification disclosing all changes in membership. Information 
regarding membership in GURF may be obtained from the Secretary, Dennis 
Winegar, Manager, Technical Services & Project

[[Page 47691]]

Development, Texaco Natural Gas International, P.O. Box 4700, Houston, 
TX, 77210-4700, Telephone (713) 752-7654, Facsimile: (713) 752-4681.
    On December 19, 1990, GURF filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
January 16, 1991, (56 FR 1655).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 18, 
1994. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 10, 1994, (59 FR 11310).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-23873 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Wilfred Lucian VEILLETTE, Appellant, v. James W. HAMMACK, et al., Appellees.

No. 69-619.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 24, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 15, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
December 9 , 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DONALD WAYNE HEROD , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00911

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1736 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 227
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1736

To provide for the participation of employees in the judicial branch in 
   the Federal leave transfer program for disasters and emergencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2005

Ms. Collins (for herself, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Voinovich, Mr. Akaka, Mr. 
Vitter, and Ms. Landrieu) introduced the following bill; which was read 
     twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

                           September 27, 2005

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the participation of employees in the judicial branch in 
   the Federal leave transfer program for disasters and emergencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEAVE TRANSFER PROGRAM IN DISASTERS AND EMERGENCIES.

    Section 6391 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
    ``(f) After consultation with the Administrative Office of the 
United States Courts, the Office of Personnel Management shall provide 
for the participation of employees in the judicial branch in any 
emergency leave transfer program under this section.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 227

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1736

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To provide for the participation of employees in the judicial branch in 
   the Federal leave transfer program for disasters and emergencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 27, 2005

                       Reported without amendment
```
109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2016 

To amend chapter 3 of title 28, United States Code, to provide for 11 

circuit judges on the United States Court of Appeals for the District 

of Columbia Circuit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2005 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 3 of title 28, United States Code, to 

provide for 11 circuit judges on the United States Court 

of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JUDGES ON THE UNITED STATES COURT OF AP4 PEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIR5 CUIT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The table under section 44(a) of 

7 title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the 
2 

1 item relating to the District of Columbia and inserting the 

2 following: 

‘‘District of Columbia ............................................................................... 11’’. 

3 (b) EXISTING VACANCY NOT FILLED.—In order to 

4 comply with the amendment made under subsection (a), 

5 1 of the vacancies of circuit judges on the United States 

6 Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 

7 which existed on the date preceding the date of the enact8 ment of this Act, shall not be filled. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 996-997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-245]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Indian Gaming; Notice of amendment to Approved Tribal-State 
Compact

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 2710, of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 
Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-497), the Secretary of the Interior shall 
publish, in the Federal Register, notice of approved Tribal-State 
Compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III (casino) gambling on 
Indian reservations. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Department of the Interior, through her delegated authority, has 
approved Amendment II to the Tribal-State Compact for Regulation of 
Class III Gaming Between The Klamath Tribes and the State of Oregon, 
which was executed on November 13, 1996.

DATES: This action is effective January 7, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George T. Skibine, Director, Indian 
Gaming Management Staff, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240 
(202) 219-4068.


[[Page 997]]


    Dated: December 26, 1996.
Elizabeth L. Homer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-245 Filed 1-6-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
# L_2005036EN.01000701.xml

| 9.2.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 36/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 36/7

---

DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES MEETING WITHIN THE COUNCIL

of 27 January 2005

giving a discharge to the Secretary-General of the Convention on the Future of the European Union in respect of the implementation for the financial year 2003 of the budget of the Fund set up for the financing of the Convention

(2005/113/EU)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES MEETING WITHIN THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Decision 2002/176/EU of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, of 21 February 2002, setting up a Fund for the financing of the Convention on the Future of the European Union and laying down the financial rules for its management (1), and in particular Article 20 thereof,

Having regard to the assent of the European Parliament of 14 December 2004 on the discharge to be given to the Secretary-General of the Convention on the Future of the European Union in respect of the implementation for the financial year 2003 of the budget of the Fund set up for the financing of the Convention,

Having regard to the assent of the Council of 28 June 2004 on the discharge to be given to the Secretary-General of the Convention on the Future of the European Union in respect of the implementation for the financial year 2003 of the budget of the Fund set up for the financing of the Convention,

Having regard to the assent of the Commission of 19 October 2004 on the discharge to be given to the Secretary-General of the Convention on the Future of the European Union in respect of the implementation for the financial year 2003 of the budget of the Fund set up for the financing of the Convention,

Having examined the revenue and expenditure account, balance sheet and report by the Court of Auditors, for the financial year 2003 (2), as submitted to them,

Whereas, according to the revenue and expenditure account for the financial year 2003:

| — | revenue amounted to EUR 4 088 524 |
| --- | --- |

—

revenue amounted to EUR 4 088 524

| — | expenditure disbursed from appropriations amounted to EUR 3 968 149, |
| --- | --- |

—

expenditure disbursed from appropriations amounted to EUR 3 968 149,

| | |
| --- | --- |

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

| | |
| --- | --- |

| | |
| --- | --- |

| | |
| --- | --- |

Sole Article

A discharge is hereby given to the Secretary-General of the Convention on the Future of the European Union in respect of the implementation for the financial year 2003 of the budget of the Fund set up for the financing of the Convention.

Done at Brussels, 27 January 2005.

The President

M. SCHOMMER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 60, 1.3.2002, p. 56.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 157, 14.6.2004, p. 1.

2

---
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Anthony Luke CAPRIO, Joseph Frank Miranda, Thomas Vincent D’Alessio, and Edward Arthur Betit, Appellees.

No. 78-180.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 8, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 15, 1978.

Janet Reno, State’s Atty., and Milton Robbins, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellant.

Engel, Aronson, Fried & Cohn, Philip Carlton, Jr., Miami, Robert J. O’Toole, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The order of dismissal under review is reversed on the authority of *State v. Sobel,*363 So.2d 324 (Fla.1978).

The cause is returned to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with *State v. Sobel,*supra.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


         We hereby consent to references to Ryder Scott as expert and to the use
of oil and natural gas reserve information with respect to the Morgan Properties
depicted in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2000 for
Queen Sand Resources, Inc., a Delaware corporation, that was derived from our
reserve reports dated June 30, 1998 and June 30, 1999, incorporated by reference
in (i) the Prospectus constituting a part of the Registration Statement on Form
S-3 (No.333-47577) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, (ii) the
Prospectus constituting a part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3
(No.333-61375) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, (iii) the
Prospectus constituting a part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3
(No.333-70993) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, (iv) the
Prospectus constituting a part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3
(No.333- 78001) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and (v) the
Prospectus constituting a part of the Registration Statement on Form S-8 and the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-67951) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.


                                         /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

                                         RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.