alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, William Whittle, President, CEO and CFO of General Gold Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of General Gold Corporation for the nine month period ended October 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of General Gold Corporation.

Dated: December 16, 2004

/s/ William Whittle				William Whittle
President, CEO and CFO (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Reporting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

                 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.
                              A Nevada corporation
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of   International   Building
Technologies  Group,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth Yeung, President,  Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authentication,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed from  within  the  electronic  version of this
written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: May 15, 2009       /s/ Kenneth Yeung
                         -------------------------------------------------------
                         Kenneth Yeung
                         President, Chief Executive Officer and
                         Chief Financial Officer
                         (Principal Accounting, Executive and Financial Officer)
Exhibit  32.1
                                                                  -------------

                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                              A Nevada corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
GORDON MUIR, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




         Dated: November 13, 2003                  /s/ Gordon Muir
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Its: Chief Executive Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
         other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
         signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
         this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
         retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are
         accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906
         of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
         1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
         filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.














                                       23
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Main Street Medcare, P.C., as Assignee of Doreen Pittelli, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>GEICO General Insurance Co., Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Law Office of Goldstein &amp; Flecker (Lawrence J. Chanice of counsel), for appellant.The Odierno Law Firm, P.C., for respondent (no brief filed).</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Jodi Orlow, J.), entered November 28, 2016. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $2,231.10.</p><p>ORDERED that, on the court's own motion, the notice of appeal from the oral decision made on November 17, 2015 is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment entered November 28, 2016 (<i>see</i> CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.</p><p>At a nonjury trial of this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the sole issue was the medical necessity of the services in question. The Civil Court precluded the testimony of defendant's expert witness, who did not prepare the underlying peer review report, on the ground that such testimony would be hearsay, and granted plaintiff's motion for a directed verdict. Defendant appeals from the judgment that was subsequently entered in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $2,231.10.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>North Am. Partners in Anesthesia, LLP, as Assignee of Jose Maravilla v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co.</i> (_ Misc 3d__, 2019 NY Slip Op __ [appeal No. 2017-91 Q C], decided herewith), the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: May 03, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### Blackstock *versus*Long.

In an action against several persons as owners of a steamboat for supplies furnished for the use of the boat, the declaration of one of the defendants, after the supplies were furnished, that he was one of the owners of the boat, was admissible on the part of the plaintiffs, though the defendant did not say *how long*he had been an owner.

Error to the District Court of *Allegheny county.*

This was an action by Long and others *v.*Blackstock, Hunter, & Hill, as owners of the steamboat Lydia Collins, to recover the amount of certain stores, groceries, &c., alleged to have been furnished by the plaintiffs for the use of the boat. See the facts of the case stated in the ease of Blackstock *v.*Leidy, antea.

The plaintiffs’ book of original entries was produced, showing charges amounting to ¡$234.50, between 2d March and 28th of May, 1850.

Noble, the witness who proved the book .of original entries, testified that *Sill,*one of the defendants, *told him (ihe was an owner of the boat.*This was on the day or the day after the boat was attached by the sheriff.” The boat was levied on June 11, 1850, and sold on 24th of the same month.

Forward, J., charged, *inter alia,*that the *“*admission of Hill to Noble is some evidence, and will be taken by the jury for what it is worth. It is not conclusive evidence of ownership at the date of the sales; but it is evidence from which the jury may, if they think proper, infer a previous ownership, and find accordingly.”

Verdict was rendered for plaintiffs for $234.50.

Error was assigned, *inter alia,*to the portion of the charge above quoted.

*Williams,*with whom was *Cochran*and *Shader,*for plaintiffs in error.

*341Per Curiam.

The principal questions argued in this case have been decided in Blackstock *v.*Leidy.

The evidence of Hill’s declarations that he was one of the owners of the boat was rightly admitted, though the declaration was made after the supplies were furnished, and though he did not say how long he had been an owner. The value of a declaration made by a party against his own interest depends so much upon accompanying circumstances that we will not attempt to say what weight the jury should have given it in this case. It was believed by both judge and jury, and that is enough. As a general rule, it is not unfair to take a man at his word.

Judgment affirmed.
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In the Interest of R.H., T.H. a/k/a T.G., * From the 161st District

M.H., A.G., M.G., and E.H., children, Court of Ector County,

Trial Court No. B

- 3228

- PC.

No. 11

- 13

- 00356

- CV * May 8, 2014

* Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that t here is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion, the order

of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1850 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to accelerate the availability of 

various income tax credits providing incentives for energy incentive products and practices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 6, 2005 

Mr. SALAZAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to accelerate the 

availability of various income tax credits providing incentives for energy incentive products and practices, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rapid Efficiency Cred5 it Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 1850 IS

1 SEC. 2. ACCELERATION OF CERTAIN ENERGY INCOME TAX 

2 CREDITS. 

3 Sections 1333(c), 1335(c), 1336(e), 1337(d), 

4 1341(c), and 1342(c) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 

5 are each amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2005’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘the date of the enactment of the Rapid Effi7 ciency Credit Act of 2005’’. 

8 SEC. 3. CREDIT FOR ENERGY STAR COMPLIANT COMPACT 

9 FLUORESCENT LIGHT BULBS. 

10 (a) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—Subsection (a) of sec11 tion 25D(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relat12 ing to residential energy efficient property) is amended— 

13 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

14 (2), 

15 (2) by striking the period at the end of para16 graph (3) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and 

17 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

18 paragraph: 

19 ‘‘(4) 30 percent of the qualified compact fluo20 rescent light expenditures made by the taxpayer dur21 ing such year.’’. 

22 (b) MAXIMUM CREDIT.—Subsection (b)(1) of section 

23 25D of such Code is amended— 

24 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara25 graph (B), 
3 

•S 1850 IS

1 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub2 paragraph (C) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub4 paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(D) $50 with respect to any qualified 

6 compact fluorescent light expenditure.’’. 

7 (c) DEFINITION.—Section 25D(d) of such Code is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following new para9 graph: 

10 ‘‘(4) QUALIFIED COMPACT FLUORESCENT

11 LIGHT EXPENDITURE.—The term ‘qualified compact 

12 fluorescent light expenditure’ means an expenditure 

13 for Energy Star compliant compact fluorescent light 

14 bulbs for use in a dwelling unit located in the United 

15 States and used as a residence by the taxpayer.’’. 

16 (d) LABOR COSTS NOT INCLUDED.—Section 

17 25D(e)(1) of such Code is amended by inserting ‘‘(other 

18 than paragraph (4) thereof)’’ after ‘‘subsection (d)’’. 

19 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

21 the date of the enactment of this Act, in taxable years 

22 ending after such date. 

Æ
# Official Journal C 91I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 091I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6418 March 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 091I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6418 March 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | JOINT DECLARATIONS |
| | European Parliament |
| 2021/C 91 I/01 | Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission on the Conference on the Future of Europe – Engaging with citizens for democracy – Building a more resilient Europe | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

JOINT DECLARATIONS

European Parliament

2021/C 91 I/01

Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission on the Conference on the Future of Europe – Engaging with citizens for democracy – Building a more resilient Europe

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2021/C 91 I/02 | Communication of the European Parliament concerning the European Citizen’s Prize – CIVI EUROPAEO PRAEMIUM | 5 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Parliament

2021/C 91 I/02

Communication of the European Parliament concerning the European Citizen’s Prize – CIVI EUROPAEO PRAEMIUM

CIVI EUROPAEO PRAEMIUM

5

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1752 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1752

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the United States Grain Standards Act to reauthorize that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF ACT.

    (a) In General.--Sections 7(j)(4), 7A(l)(3), 7D, 19, and 21(e) of 
the United States Grains Standards Act (7 U.S.C. 79(j)(4), 79a(l)(3), 
79d, 87h, 87j(e)) are amended by striking ``2005'' each place it 
appears and inserting ``2015''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) take 
effect on September 30, 2005.

            Passed the Senate September 22, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1752

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the United States Grain Standards Act to reauthorize that Act.
```
Exhibit 99.1 CERTIFICATION OF AMENDED PERIODIC REPORT

I, Robert Klein, President and Chief Executive Officer of Golden Spirit Minerals
Ltd. a Delaware Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the amended
quarterly period ended September 30, 2003(the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 05, 2004

/s/ Robert Klein
Robert Klein
President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.5
 EXECUTION COPY
 GUARANTY AND SURETYSHIP AGREEMENT
 Guaranty Guarantor Landlord
 WITNESSETH:
 Lease Tenant Leased Premises
    
 Guaranteed Obligations Guaranteed Obligations
 Monetary Obligations
 Performance Obligations




---



##### 



Guarantee Unconditional




---



##### 



de jure de facto




---



##### 



Disaffirmance of Lease
 No Notice or Duty to Exhaust Remedies
   Subrogation




---



##### 



REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS
 Representations and Warranties
 Financial Statements; Books and Records
 GAAP




---



##### 



Notice of Certain Events
 Estoppel Certificates
 EVENTS OF DEFAULT
 Events of Default




---



##### 



Asset Transfer
 MISCELLANEOUS
 Effect Of Bankruptcy Proceedings
 Further Assurances




---



##### 



Amendments, Waivers, Etc
 No Implied Waiver; Cumulative Remedies
 Notices
 Expenses
 Survival
 Severability
 Counterparts




---



##### 



Governing Law
  Jury Trial
 Successors and Assigns; Joint and Several




---



##### 



Incorporation of Recitals; Definitions
 Rights of Lender




---



##### 



LIFE TIME FITNESS, INC.,
a Minnesota corporationBy:

/s/ Eric J. BussTitle: Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 141 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 141

 To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to allow up to 
 24 months of vocational educational training to be counted as a work 
   activity under the temporary assistance to needy families program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

Mr. Levin (for himself and Mr. Jeffords) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to allow up to 
 24 months of vocational educational training to be counted as a work 
   activity under the temporary assistance to needy families program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN NUMBER OF MONTHS OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATIONAL 
              TRAINING COUNTED AS A WORK ACTIVITY UNDER THE TANF 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 407(d)(8) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 607(d)(8)) 
is amended by striking ``12'' and inserting ``24''.
                                 <all>
```
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Collective Bargaining Provisions : Union and Management Functions, Rights and Responsibilities

              																	Weiss, Abraham, 1913-					 and 	Lehrer, Eleanor R. 						*Collective Bargaining Provisions : Union and Management Functions, Rights and Responsibilities : Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 908-12*,												Washington: 								U.S. G.P.O., 										1949,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4400,			accessed on September 24, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ARTIE McCLOUD : 4:CV-04-0943

Plaintiff : (Judge McClure)

v. : (Magistrate Judge Mannion)

SUPT. SHANNON, et al., :

 Defendants :

O R D E R

August 31, 2005

BACKGROUND:

On April 29, 2004, the plaintiff, a former inmate at the State Correctional

Institution, Frackville, Pennsylvania, filed a complaint in which he alleged violations

of his constitutional rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The case was initially referred to United States Magistrate Judge Malachy E.

Mannion. 

On June 29, 2004, plaintiff filed a document captioned “Amended and

Supplemental Pleadings” which Magistrate Judge Mannion, by order of July 6,

2004, construed as an Amended Complaint. On September 17, 2004, the three

named defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). 

Case 4:04-cv-00943-JFM Document 38 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 3
2

The motion was eventually fully briefed. 

On August 12, 2005, Magistrate Judge Mannion issued his report and

recommendation in which he recommended that the motion to dismiss plaintiff’s

complaint filed on behalf of defendants Shannon, Searfoss and Miller be granted. 

Plaintiff has filed no objections to the report and recommendation. 

The court will accept the report and recommendation for the reasons set

forth therein, and will dismiss the amended complaint with prejudice as against

defendants Shannon, Searfoss and Miller. 

The court will also dismiss all claims as against the John Doe defendants,

without prejudice, for failure to prosecute, as plaintiff has had sufficient opportunity

since the initiation of this action to identify the John Doe defendants. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Malachy E. Mannion filed August 12, 2005 (rec. doc. no. 37) is approved and

accepted for the reasons therein set forth. 

2. The motion to dismiss filed on behalf of defendants Shannon,

Searfoss and Miller (rec. doc. no. 20, filed September 17, 2004)is granted.:

3. The amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice as against

Case 4:04-cv-00943-JFM Document 38 Filed 08/31/05 Page 2 of 3
3

defendants Shannon, Searfoss and Miller. 

 4. The complaint is dismissed, without prejudice, as against the three

John Doe defendants, for failure to prosecute under and pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.

41(b).

5. The clerk is directed to close the case file.

 s/ James F. McClure, Jr. 

James F. McClure, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-00943-JFM Document 38 Filed 08/31/05 Page 3 of 3
# 05-73044 Febronio v. Gonzales

Rymer, Wardlaw, CJJ; Ware (N.Cal), DJ

2006

123.56343