March 4,

MEMO

To:

From:

Subject:

This Mem

modeling

impairme

BART mo

Western

Arizona R

BACKGRO

The purp

Air Act (C

remedy a

CAAA ide

Wilderne

related v

natural v

make rea

submit St

156 Class

become

the goal

further p

the term

program

more of a

August 7

categorie

performe

area.  If a

anticipat

                

1 http://pa

2 http://w

773 Sa

, 2013

ORANDUM

Eric H

Ralph

Updat

morandum p

g using revis

ent at Class

odeling follow

Regional Ai

Regional Haz

OUND

pose of the R

CAA) in the 1

any existing,

entified 156

ess Areas tha

values (AQRV

visibility cond

asonable pro

tate Implem

s I areas.  Th

long term re

that Congre

progress is ca

“BART‐eligi

.  BART‐eligi

a visibility‐im

, 1977, and

es.  Once a fa

ed to determ

a State deter

ted to cause

                     

ah.cert.ucr.edu

ww.azdeq.gov

an Marin Drive,

M

iser, Jorden,

Morris and

ted CALPUFF

presents upd

ed emission

I areas withi

wed the sam

r Partnershi

ze Rule (RHR

Regional Haz

1977 Clean A

, impairmen

mandatory

at are offere

Vs; e.g., visib

ditions in the

ogress towar

mentation Pla

hese RHR SIP

egional haze

ss set.  One

alled Best Av

ble source”

ble sources

mpairing air

whose oper

acility has be

mine if that f

rmines that

or contribut

                  

u/aqm/308/ba

v/environ/air/h

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

, Bischoff an

Lynsey Park

F BART Mod

dated CALPU

ns for the Asa

in 300 km of

me procedur

p (WRAP1) C

R) State Impl

ze Rule (RHR

Air Act Amen

t of visibility

Class I areas

ed special pr

bility and aci

e Class I area

rds the achie

ans (SIPs) to

Ps are intend

strategies t

of the tools

vailable Retr

to describe

are those so

pollutant; w

ations fall w

een determi

facility cause

the facility “

te to any im

rt.shtml

haze/download

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

1

nd Hiser, PLC

ker

eling for the

UFF Best Ava

arco Hayden

f the source

res and used

CALPUFF BAR

lementation

R), outlined i

ndments (CA

y caused by m

s that consis

otection aga

d deposition

as by 2064.

evement of t

address reg

ded to be the

to demonstr

provided to

rofit Techno

the sources

ources that h

were constru

within one or

ined to be B

es or contrib

“emits any a

pairment of

d/haze308sip.p

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

C

e Asarco Hay

ailable Retro

n facility to e

.  For consist

d the same d

RT modeling

n Plan (SIP2)

n Sections 1

AAA), is to pr

manmade so

t of specific

ainst adverse

n).  The goal

In the inter

this nationa

gional haze v

e first in a se

ate reasona

o the States t

logy (BART).

that are po

have the pot

ucted betwee

r more of the

BART‐eligible

butes to visib

ir pollutant

f visibility in

pdf

F: 415‐899‐070

yden Facility

fit Technolo

estimate visi

tency, the u

databases as

g that was us

subject‐to‐B

169A and 169

revent any f

ources at Cla

National Pa

e air quality

of the RHR

im, States a

l goal and ar

visibility imp

eries of actio

ble further p

to address r

.  The region

tentially sub

tential to em

en August 7,

e 26 specific

e, air quality

bility impairm

which may r

any such are

7

y

ogy (BART)

bility

pdated CAL

used by the

sed in the

BART analysi

9B of the Cle

future, and

ass I areas.  T

rks and

and air qua

is to achieve

re required t

re required

pairment in t

ons that will

progress tow

reasonable

nal haze rule

bject to this

mit 250 tons

, 1962 and

cally listed so

modeling is

ment at a Cla

reasonably b

ea,” then th

PUFF

e

s.   

ean

The

lity

e

to

the

ward

es use

or

ource

ass I

be

e
facility is

oxides of

The Arizo

Quality (A

modeling

Center (R

impacts a

WRAP RM

to the sta

On June

for each

screening

due to em

On June

modeling

“potentia

each yea

within 30

impairme

98th perc

300 kilom

Class I ar

emission

determin

On July 1

another s

one of th

CALPUFF

Class I ar

was 2.39

facility ca

98th perc

0.53 dv.  

PM emis

As a resu

BART‐elig

                

3 http://w

773 Sa

deemed to

f nitrogen (N

ona RHR SIP

ADEQ) addre

g conducted

RMC).  The W

at Class I are

MC CALPUFF

ates that the

9, 2006, ADE

potentially‐

g modeling a

missions fro

7, 2007, the

g analysis.  B

ally‐BART‐el

r averaged o

00 kilometer

ent of visibil

centile visibil

meters away

rea.  In most

s that contr

ned that the

13, 2007, AD

source that

he sources th

F BART mode

rea within 30

9.  As this val

aused visibil

centile visibil

As this valu

sions contrib

ult of these m

gible for PM

                     

ww.azdeq.gov

an Marin Drive,

be subject‐t

NOX), sulfur d

dated June

esses the BA

by the Wes

WRAP RMC u

eas due to po

F BART mode

en made the

EQ provided

BART‐eligibl

analysis to d

m facility.

WRAP RMC

Based upon t

igible” sourc

over three y

rs of the faci

ity in that Cl

lity impact w

y, the facility

cases where

ibuted to, or

facility was

EQ identifie

was recomm

hat the ADEQ

eling estimat

00 km of the

ue is above

ity impairme

lity impact a

e is greater t

butes to visi

modeling res

and SO2 em

                  

v/environ/air/h

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

to‐BART. Vis

dioxide (SO2

2011 prepar

ART program

stern Region

used the CAL

otential BAR

eling was a s

e subject‐to‐

d potential e

e facility to

determine th

C provided A

the CALPUFF

ce’s 98th per

ears) was gr

ility, the faci

lass I area.  S

was found to

y would be c

e a “potenti

r caused, im

“potentially

d eight sour

mended for f

Q identified

ted that the

e Asarco Hay

the 1.0 dv th

ent at a Clas

at any Class I

than 0.5 dv,

bility impair

sults, ADEQ d

missions (see

haze/download

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

2

sibility impai

) and particu

red by the A

m for sources

al Air Partne

LPUFF dispe

RT‐eligible so

screening an

BART determ

missions inf

the WRAP R

he predicted

ADEQ with th

F modeling r

rcentile visib

reater than 0

lity would b

Similarly, if t

o be greater

onsidered to

ally‐BART‐el

mpairment of

y‐subject‐to‐

rces that we

further evalu

as potential

maximum 9

yden facility

hreshold the

s I area.  The

area due to

then the AD

rment at a C

determined

e page 22 of

d/app_d.pdf

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

ring pollutan

ulate matter

Arizona Depa

s in Arizona.

ership (WRA

rsion model

ources in 7 o

nalysis whos

mination.

formation al

RMC, which p

visibility im

he results of

results, ADEQ

bility impact

0.5 deciview

be considere

the “potenti

than 1.0 dv

o cause impa

ligible” sour

f visibility in

‐BART.”  

re potential

uation.  The

lly subject‐to

98th percent

due to the s

en ADEQ con

e WRAP CAL

o the Hayden

DEQ conclud

lass I area.  

that the Asa

f Appendix D

F: 415‐899‐070

nts include e

r (PM).  

artment of E

  ADEQ relie

AP) Regional

l to simulate

of the WRAP

e informatio

ong with sta

performed a

mpairment at

the CALPUF

Q determine

(e.g., 8th hig

ws (dv) in any

d to contrib

ally‐BART‐e

in any Class

airment of v

ce was foun

a Class I are

ly‐subject‐to

Asarco Hay

o‐BART.  The

ile visibility i

source’s SO2

ncluded that

LPUFF‐estim

n facility PM

ded that the

arco Hayden

D of the AZ R

7

emissions of

Environment

ed on air qua

Modeling

e the visibilit

P States.  The

on was prov

ack paramet

a CALPUFF

t Class I area

FF BART

ed that if a

ghest value in

y Class I area

ute to

ligible” sour

s I area less t

visibility in th

nd to have

ea, ADEQ

o‐BART and

den smelter

e WRAP RMC

impact at an

emissions a

t the Hayden

ated maxim

M emissions w

Asarco Hayd

n facility was

RHR SIP3).

f

tal

ality

ty

e

ided

ers

as

n

a

rce’s

than

hat

r was

C

ny

alone

n

mum

was

den

s
PURPOSE

Asarco h

the WRA

to emit (

emission

existing c

modeling

from the

state ope

Guideline

RMC for

Internati

revised e

BART scr

UPDATED

Approac

The upda

15, 2006

ago and s

recomme

consisten

Modeling

The CALM

modeling

exceptio

which we

created.

the three

same ver

the three

Hayden f

exercised

areas rep

Emission

                

4 40 C.F.R.

5 http://pa

6 http://pa

773 Sa

E

as raised iss

AP RMC for t

PTE) oversta

units at the

controls at t

g analysis (e

Hayden fac

erating cond

es,4 and foun

the subject‐

onal Corpor

emission esti

eening mod

D CALPUFF B

h

ated CALPUF

CALPUFF BA

since then th

ended proce

nt with the A

g Protocol p

MET inputs a

g are availab

n to this are

ere not arch

The version

e years (200

rsion of CALP

e years using

facility emiss

d using the r

ported.

n Scenarios

                     

Part 51, App.

ah.cert.ucr.edu

ah.cert.ucr.edu

an Marin Drive,

ues with the

he CALPUFF

ated emissio

e Hayden fac

he Hayden f

.g., baghous

ility to come

ditions durin

nd that they

‐to‐BART CA

ration (ENVIR

imates.  ENV

eling.

BART MODE

FF BART mod

ART Modelin

here have be

edures for re

Arizona RHR

rocedures a

and most of

ble for down

the meteor

ived on the

n of CALMET

1, 2002 and

PUFF as used

g the new m

sions as used

revised emis

                  

Y, § III.A.3, Op

u/aqm/308/ba

u/aqm/308/ba

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

e emissions f

BART scree

on rates, rath

cility that are

facility were

se on the con

e up with the

g periods of

y are much le

LPUFF mode

RON) to perf

VIRON was p

ELING

deling follow

ng Protocol5

een updates

egulatory CA

SIP subject‐

nd models w

the CALPUF

load from th

rological inp

WRAP RMC

T used by WR

2003) using

d by WRAP (

eteorologica

d in the WRA

sions provid

tion 1(2)

rt/WRAP_RMC

rt.shtml

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

3

for the Hayd

ning modeli

her than max

e not BART‐e

accounted f

nverters).  A

e maximum

f high capaci

ess than the

eling analysi

form update

part of the W

wed the appr

.  These proc

s to the CALP

ALPUFF mode

‐to‐BART mo

were used in

FF inputs use

he WRAP RM

uts for CALP

website due

RAP (CALME

g the same in

(CALPUFF V6

al inputs fro

AP RMC CAL

ded by Asarc

C_BART_Proto

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

den facility t

ng.  These is

ximum actu

eligible.  In a

for in the su

Asarco has an

actual emis

ty utilization

emissions A

s.  Thus, Asa

ed CALPUFF

WRAP RMC a

roach outlin

cedures wer

PUFF model

eling.  Howe

odeling, the

n the update

ed in the WR

MC BART mo

PUFF (i.e., th

e to their lar

ET V6.211, Le

nputs and op

6.112, Level

m the CALM

LPUFF runs.  

co and the vi

ocol_Aug15_20

F: 415‐899‐070

hat the ADE

ssues includ

al values, an

addition, it is

bject‐to‐BAR

nalyzed actu

ssions reflect

n” as require

ADEQ provid

arco retained

BART mode

and headed u

ned in the W

re developed

ing system a

ever, in orde

WRAP CALP

ed CALPUFF

RAP RMC CA

odeling webs

e CALMET.D

rge size so h

evel 060414

ptions as use

060414) wa

MET runs and

CALPUFF w

isibility impa

006.pdf

7

EQ provided

e using pote

nd including

s not clear th

RT CALPUFF

ual emissions

tive of “stea

ed by EPA’s B

ded to the W

d ENVIRON

eling using

up the CALP

RAP RMC Au

d over six ye

and EPA’s

er to be

PUFF BART

BART model

ALPUFF scree

site6.  The

DAT output f

ad to be re‐

) was rerun

ed in WRAP.

as then run f

d the origina

as then

acts at Class

to

ential

hat

s

dy‐

BART

WRAP

PUFF

ugust

ears

ling.

ening

file),

for

.  The

for

al

I
Two emis

emission

that Asar

actual em

supposed

revised e

scenarios

fugitive s

original s

provided

facility.  T

original a

the Lamb

WRAP RM

very low

emission

(689 g/s)

original v

CALPUFF

Table 1.  

Name

Original

AZ10

AZ11

AZ12

AZ13

Revised

AZ10

AZ11

AZ12

AZ13

                

7

40 C.F.R.

773 Sa

ssion scenar

s that the A

rco provided

missions for

d to be used

emissions for

s include fou

sources who

stack parame

d by Asarco.  

There are ch

and revised H

bert Conform

MC Modelin

NOX emissio

s, whereas t

).  The bigges

value (64 g/s

F BART Mode

Original and

LCC‐X

(km)

‐1279.791

‐1279.791

‐1279.791

‐1279.791

‐1279.485

‐1279.485

‐1279.460

‐1279.474

                     

Part 51, App. Y

an Marin Drive,

rios were an

DEQ provide

d to ENVIRON

the Hayden

d in subject‐t

r Hayden are

ur sources at

ose emission

eters used in

Table 2 com

hanges in bo

Hayden emi

mal Conic (LC

g Protocol fo

ons (2.27 g/s

the revised C

st change be

s) was reduc

eling Protoco

d revised sta

LCC‐Y

(km)

1  ‐677.829

1  ‐677.829

1  ‐677.829

1  ‐677.829

5  ‐677.437

5  ‐677.437

0  ‐677.589

4  ‐677.684

                  

Y, § III.A.3, Opt

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

alyzed in the

ed to the WR

N in January

facility durin

to‐BART mod

e available f

t the Hayden

s were relea

n the WRAP

mpares the o

th the stack

ssion scenar

CC) coordina

or details on

s).  The origi

CALPUFF mo

etween the o

ced 93% in th

ol, all PM em

ack paramet

Elev

(m)

633.984

633.984

633.984

633.984

651.662

651.662

646.481

646.481

tion 1(2),

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

4

e updated C

RAP RMC in

y 2012.  The

ng periods o

deling analy

rom Asarco.

n facility, tw

ased closer t

RMC CALPU

original and r

parameters

rios.  The loc

ate system u

n the LCC def

nal CALPUFF

odeling assum

original and

he revised m

missions wer

ters for the

Height

(m)

4 304.800

4 280.416

4 198.120

4 198.10

2 304.8

2 302.24

1 25.298

1 24.872

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

CALPUFF mod

June, 2006;

revised emi

of high capac

ysis.7 Details

.  The origina

wo point sour

to the surfac

UFF and the

revised emis

s and emissio

cations of th

used in the C

finition).  Bo

F modeling a

med SO2 em

revised emi

modeling (4 g

re treated as

Asarco Hay

t Diamet

(m)

0 5.182

6 10.363

0 10.0

10.0

5.182

7.288

13.757

24.144

F: 415‐899‐070

deling: (1) th

and (2) revi

ssions repre

city  utilizati

on the deve

al and revise

rces with sta

ce.  Table 1 c

revised stac

ssions for th

on rates bet

e sources ar

CALPUFF mo

oth sets of e

assumed 1,0

missions that

issions are fo

g/s).  Follow

s fine particu

den facility.

er Temper

(K)

423.706

330.372

295.0

295.0

416.483

321.844

310.928

310.928

7

he original

ised emissio

esent maxim

on, which ar

elopment of

ed emission

acks and two

compares th

k parameter

e Hayden

tween the

re reported

deling (see

missions hav

051 g/s of SO

t were 34% l

or PM where

ing the WRA

ulate (PM2.5)

.

rature

)

Velo

(m

6 5.791

2 10.36

0.1

0.1

3 83.98

4 38.42

8 0.61

8 1.536

ns

mum

re

f the

o

e

rs

using

ve

O2

ower

e the

AP

).

ocity

m/s)

1

63

89

25

6
Table 2.  

Source

Original

AZ10

AZ11

AZ12

AZ13

Total

Revised

AZ10

AZ11

AZ12

AZ13

Total

Percent

CALPUFF

Attachm

all Class I

original r

CALPUFF

results fr

results fo

always o

Hayden f

km from

(SIAN) th

SUPE.  Ta

column f

1. T

2. T

3. D

4. M

C

5. 9

6. 9

773 Sa

Original and

SO2

(g/s)

67.800

914.40

1.710

66.840

1050.7

71.18

578.27

2.15

37.61

689.21

‐34.4%

F Modeling R

ents A, B an

I areas withi

results from

F modeling u

rom the upd

or the two cl

ccur are rep

facility are G

the Hayden

hat was 84 km

ables 3 throu

for each Clas

he Class I ar

he Class I ar

Distance from

Maximum vis

ALPUFF mod

9th percentil

8th percentil

an Marin Drive,

d revised em

NOX

(g/s

0 0.11

00 1.37

0 0.78

0 0.00

75 2.27

8 0.11

7 1.37

0.78

0.00

1 2.27

% 0.0%

Results

d C list the A

n 300 km of

the WRAP R

using the sam

ated CALPU

losest Class

peated in Tab

Galiuro (GALI

n facility; the

m from Hayd

ugh 6 and At

ss I area with

ea four lette

ea name (at

m Hayden fa

sibility impac

deling (in de

le (11th highe

le (22nd high

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

mission rate

X

s)

PM

(g/s

19 14.59

71 14.59

80 5.79

00 29.03

7 64.0

19 0.24

71 1.0

80 2.3

00 0.9

7 4.47

%  ‐93.0

Asarco Hayd

f the Hayden

RMC screeni

me (original)

FF modeling

I areas to Ha

bles 3 throug

I) and Super

e next closes

den and had

ttachments A

hin 300 km o

er identifier;

ttachments o

cility to the

ct due to Ha

eciview or dv

est day) visib

est day) visi

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

5

s for the Asa

M

s)

95

95

96

30

16

4

1

1

1

7

0%

en facility CA

n facility for,

ng modeling

emissions a

g using the re

ayden facility

gh 6 below.

stition (SUP

t Class I area

d visibility im

A, B and C h

of the Hayde

only);

Class I area

yden facility

v);

bility impact

bility impact

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

arco Hayden

ALPUFF esti

respectively

g; (B) the res

as used by th

evised emiss

y where the

The two clo

E) Wildernes

a was the Sie

mpacts ~40%

have the follo

en facility:

(km);

y on any day

t during the

t during the

F: 415‐899‐070

n facility.

mated visibi

y, three scen

sults for the

he WRAP RM

sions from A

e maximum v

osest Class I

ss Areas tha

erra Ancha W

% lower than

owing inform

y during the t

three years

three years

7

ility impacts

narios: (A) th

updated

MC; and (C) t

Asarco.  The

visibility imp

areas to the

at are 47 and

Wilderness

at GALI and

mation in ea

three years

of modeling

s of modeling

at

he

the

pacts

e

d 49

d

ch

of

g.

g;
7. N

0

8. 9

9. 9

10. 9

11. T

WRAP an

There are

updated

three yea

estimate

original e

a maxim

original e

ago, we w

are using

CALMET

results ca

CALMET

any even

estimate

1‐2% of e

Updated

The revis

years due

reduction

averaged

revised e

threshold

visibility

the origin

using the

                

8 http://w

773 Sa

Number of da

.5 dv;

8th percentil

8th percentil

8th percentil

hree year av

nd Updated

e slight diffe

CALPUFF us

ars visibility

s a 2.39 dv v

emissions (w

um 0.53 dv v

emissions.  G

would not ex

g different co

to generate

an vary grea

is run with t

nt, using the

98th percen

each other a

CALPUFF Re

sed emission

e to all (SO2,

n.  Consideri

d over 3 year

emissions are

d.  However

impact aver

nal emission

e revised em

                     

ww.epa.gov/tt

an Marin Drive,

ays during th

le (8th highes

le (8th highes

le (8th highes

verage of 98

CALPUFF Re

erences in th

sing original

metric and f

visibility imp

within 1%).  S

visibility imp

Given that th

xpect to be

omputers an

the CALPUF

tly (e.g., a fa

the same me

original emi

ntile visibility

and are all ab

esults using

ns reduce the

, NOX and PM

ing just SO2

rs is reduced

e used (37%

, for the PM

raged over 3

ns (0.54 dv) i

missions (0.04

                  

tn/scram/repo

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

he three yea

st day) visibi

st day) visibi

st day) visibi

th percentile

esults using O

he Hayden vi

emissions.  

for just the H

pact compare

Similarly, for

pacts versus

he WRAP RM

able to exac

nd compilers

FF meteorolo

actor of thre

eteorologica

issions both

y impacts of

bove the 0.5

Original and

e maximum

M) of Hayde

emissions al

d from 2.42 d

% reduction),

emissions a

years that w

s over a fact

4 dv).   

orts/EPA‐454_R

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

6

ars of model

ility impact i

ility impact i

ility impact i

e (8th highest

Original Emis

sibility impa

Using the m

Hayden SO2

ed to 2.42 d

r just PM em

0.54 dv for

MC CALPUFF

ctly duplicate

s.  This is esp

ogical inputs

ee) using diff

al input data

the WRAP a

the Hayden

5 dv significa

d Revised Em

98th percen

n’s emission

lone, the ma

dv using the

both of whi

alone scenar

was above th

tor of 10 bel

R‐12‐003.pdf

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

ing that the

in 2001;

in 2002;

in 2003; and

t day) visibil

ssions

acts between

maximum 98t

emissions a

v for update

missions alon

updated CA

modeling w

e the WRAP

pecially true

s; EPA studie

ferent CALM

just by vary

and updated

SO2 and PM

ance thresho

missions

ntile visibility

ns from 2.61

aximum 98th

e original em

ich are abov

rio, the maxi

he 0.5 dv sig

low the 0.5 d

F: 415‐899‐070

visibility im

d

ity impact.

n the WRAP

th percentile

lone, the W

ed CALPUFF

ne, the WRAP

LPUFF (with

was performe

RMC results

because we

es have show

MET output e

ying the CAL

d CALPUFF m

M emissions

old.

y impacts av

1 to 1.52 dv,

h percentile v

missions to 1.

ve the 0.5 dv

imum 98th p

gnificance th

dv significan

7

pact exceed

RMC and

averaged ov

RAP RMC

modeling w

P RMC estim

hin 2%) using

ed over 6 ye

s given that

e had to reru

wn CALPUFF

even with th

MET options

modeling

alone are w

eraged over

a 42%

visibility imp

.52 dv when

v significance

percentile

hreshold usin

nce threshold

ded

ver

within

mates

g the

ears

we

un

F

e

s

8

.  In

ithin

r 3

pacts

n the

e

ng

d
Table 3.  

emission

Class I

Area

Original W

GALI

SUPE

Updated

GALI

SUPE

Update CA

GALI

SUPE

Table 4.  

Class I

Area

Original W

GALI

SUPE

Updated

GALI

SUPE

Update CA

GALI

SUPE

Table 5.  

Class I

Area

Original W

GALI

SUPE

Updated

GALI

SUPE

Update CA

GALI

SUPE

773 Sa

CALPUFF vi

ns.

Dist

(km)

M

(d

WRAP RMC

47 5

49 5

CALPUFF wit

47 5

49 5

ALPUFF with

47 2

49 3

CALPUFF vi

Dist

(km)

M

(d

WRAP RMC

47 4

49 5

CALPUFF wit

47 5

49 5

ALPUFF with

47 2

49 3

CALPUFF vi

Dist

(km)

M

(d

WRAP RMC

47 0

49 0

CALPUFF wit

47 0

49 0

ALPUFF with

47 0

49 0

an Marin Drive,

sibility resu

Max

dv)

99th

(dv)

.20 3.04

.69 3.28

h Original W

.32 3.21

.70 3.25

Revised Emi

.47 1.89

.69 1.76

sibility resu

Max

dv)

99th

(dv)

.98 2.74

.33 3.03

h Original W

.11 2.84

.33 3.00

Revised Emi

.47 1.87

.67 1.75

sibility resu

Max

dv)

99th

(dv)

.02 0.01

.03 0.01

h Original W

.02 0.01

.03 0.01

Revised Emi

.02 0.01

.03 0.01

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

lts for the A

98th

(dv)

2.51

2.64

RAP RMC Em

2.47

2.52

ssions

1.39

1.40

lts for the A

98th

(dv)

2.24

2.40

RAP RMC Em

2.19

2.35

ssions

1.38

1.39

lts for the A

98th

(dv)

0.01

0.01

RAP RMC Em

0.01

0.01

ssions

0.01

0.01

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

7

Asarco Hayde

#Days

> 0.5 dv 2

338 3

313

missions

349 3

323

175

159

Asarco Hayde

#Days

> 0.5 dv 2

290

280

missions

296 3

292

167

155

Asarco Hayde

#Days

> 0.5 dv 2

0 0

0 0

missions

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

en facility a

98th

2001

98th

2002

3.01 2.02

2.46 2.42

3.31 2.02

2.52 2.46

1.89 1.04

1.56 1.28

en facility a

98th

2001

98th

2002

2.74 1.66

2.4 2.29

3.21 1.66

2.43 2.33

1.88 1.04

1.53 1.26

en facility a

98th

2001

98th

2002

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

0.01 0.01

F: 415‐899‐070

nd SO2, NOX

h

2

98th

2003

2 2.51

2 2.83

2 2.52

6 2.82

4 1.63

8 1.41

nd just the S

h

2

98th

2003

6 2.3

9 2.47

6 2.24

3 2.50

4 1.63

6 1.41

nd just the N

h

2

98th

2003

1 0.01

1 0.01

1 0.00

1 0.01

1 0.01

1 0.01

7

X and PM

98th

3‐Yr Avg

2.51

2.57

2.61

2.60

1.52

1.42

SO2 emissio

98th

3‐Yr Avg

2.23

2.39

2.37

2.42

1.52

1.40

NOX emissio

98th

3‐Yr Avg

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

ns.

ons.
Table 6.  

Class I

Area

Original W

GALI

SUPE

Updated

GALI

SUPE

Update CA

GALI

SUPE

CONCLUS

Asarco h

Hayden s

Asarco h

CALPUFF

The Arizo

adverse v

impacts a

which ex

that the

using the

over thre

significan

The Arizo

to visibili

year visib

threshold

eligible.  

0.04 dv, o

Hayden f

773 Sa

CALPUFF vi

Dist

(km)

M

(d

WRAP RMC

47 0

49 0

CALPUFF wit

47 0

49 0

ALPUFF with

47 0

49 0

SIONS FROM

as raised nu

smelter facil

as develope

F BART mode

ona RHR SIP

visibility imp

averaged ov

xceeded the

Hayden faci

e revised Hay

ee years visib

nt visibility im

ona RHR SIP

ity impairme

bility impact

d.  Based on

However, w

over a facto

facility PM e

an Marin Drive,

sibility resu

Max

dv)

99th

(dv)

.90 0.63

.81 0.52

h Original W

.90 0.62

.83 0.51

Revised Emi

.07 0.05

.08 0.04

M THE UPDA

merous issu

ity that wer

d revised em

eling.

concluded t

pairment at a

ver 3 years at

1 dv signific

lity SO2 emis

yden facility

bility impact

mpairment t

concluded t

ent at a Class

s was 0.53 d

these result

when using th

r of 10 below

missions sho

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

lts for the A

98th

(dv)

0.53

0.42

RAP RMC Em

0.52

0.41

ssions

0.04

0.03

ATED CALPU

ues associate

e used in the

missions for

that SO2 emi

a Class I area

t any Class I

ant visibility

ssions were

y emissions f

t at any Class

threshold.

that PM emi

s I area since

dv, which exc

ts ADEQ con

he revised e

w the 0.5 dv

ould not be

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

8

Asarco Hayde

#Days

> 0.5 dv 2

34 0

14 0

missions

33 0

14 0

0 0

0 0

FF MODELIN

ed with the o

e WRAP RM

the Hayden

issions from

a since the m

area within

y impairmen

BART‐eligib

found that th

s I area was

ssions from

e the maxim

ceeded the 0

ncluded that

missions the

v significant c

considered

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

en facility a

98th

2001

98th

2002

0.53 0.51

0.42 0.43

0.55 0.52

0.41 0.43

0.04 0.03

0.04 0.03

NG

overstateme

C subject‐to

facility that

the Asarco

maximum 98

300 km of t

t threshold.

le.  The upda

he maximum

1.52 dv, wh

the Asarco

mum 98th per

0.5 dv signif

t the Hayden

e 98th percen

contribution

BART‐eligibl

F: 415‐899‐070

nd just the P

h

2

98th

2003

1 0.55

3 0.40

2 0.55

3 0.41

3 0.04

3 0.03

ent of emiss

o‐BART CALP

t were used

Hayden faci

8th percentile

the source w

  So the ADE

ated CALPU

m 98th perce

hich is still ab

Hayden faci

rcentile aver

ficant contrib

n PM emissio

ntile visibilit

n threshold.

le.

7

PM emission

98th

3‐Yr Avg

0.53

0.41

0.54

0.42

0.04

0.04

ions for thei

PUFF modeli

in updated

ility caused

e visibility

was 2.39 dv,

EQ conclude

FF modeling

ntile averag

bove the 1 d

lity contribu

rage over th

bution

ons are BART

ty impact is o

Thus, the

ns.

ir

ng.  

d

g

ed

v

uted

ree

T‐

only
773 Sa

Asarco

(Sou

n Marin Drive,

Hayden Fa

Origina

rce:  http:/

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

ATTA

acility Visib

al WRAP R

//pah.cert

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

9

ACHMENT

bility Impa

RMC CALPU

t.ucr.edu/a

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

T A

acts at Clas

UFF Mode

aqm/308/

F: 415‐899‐070

ss I Areas f

ling

/bart.shtm

7

from  

ml)
gali Galiu

supe Supe

sian Sierra

sagu Sagua

maza Maza

moba Moun

pimo Pine 

chir Chiric

gila Gila W

pefo Petrif

syca Syca

gali Galiu

supe Supe

sian Sierra

sagu Sagua

maza Maza

moba Moun

pimo Pine 

chir Chiric

gila Gila W

pefo Petrif

syca Syca

SRC05 ASA

gali Galiu

supe Supe

sian Sierra

sagu Sagua

maza Maza

moba Moun

pimo Pine 

chir Chiric

gila Gila W

pefo Petrif

syca Syca

Class I Area

SRC05 ASA

Class I Area

SRC05 ASA

Class I Area

773 Sa

ro Wilderness

rstition Wildernes

a Ancha Wilderne

aro NM

atzal Wilderness

nt Baldy Wildernes

Mountain Wildern

cahua NM

Wilderness

fied Forest NP

more Canyon WiA

ro Wilderness

rstition Wildernes

a Ancha Wilderne

aro NM

atzal Wilderness

nt Baldy Wildernes

Mountain Wildern

cahua NM

Wilderness

fied Forest NP

more Canyon WA

ARCO – Hayden S

ro Wilderness

rstition Wildernes

a Ancha Wilderne

aro NM

atzal Wilderness

nt Baldy Wildernes

Mountain Wildern

cahua NM

Wilderness

fied Forest NP

more Canyon WA

a

ARCO – Hayden S

a

ARCO – Hayden S

a

an Marin Drive,

Minimum 

(km

47

ss 49

ess 84

86

121

ss 151

ness 167

169

186

215

A 239

Minimum 

(km

47

ss 49

ess 84

86

121

ss 151

ness 167

169

186

215

A 239

Smelter: NOx O

Minimum 

(km

47

ss 49

ess 84

86

121

ss 151

ness 167

169

186

215

A 239

Smelter: SO2 On

Smelter: SO2 = 

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

Distance Max D

m) (d

7 5

9 5

4 4

6 5

1 4

1 2

7 2

9 3

6 2

5 2

9 1

Distance Max D

m) (d

7 4

9 5

4

6 5

1 4

1 2

7 2

9 2

6 2

5 2

9 1

nly: NOx = 80 TP

Distance Max D

m) (d

7 0

9 0

4 0

6 0

1 0

1 0

7 0

9 0

6 0

5 0

9

nly: SO2 = 36,52

Resultsf

36,524 TPY; NOx

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

10

Delta-dv 99th 98

dv) (dv) (d

5.2 3.04 2.

.69 3.28 2.

.07 2.02 1.

.44 2.34 1.

.15 1.7 1.

.28 1.09 0.

.66 1.23 1.

.08 1.91 1.

.33 1.04 0.

.93 1.22 0.

1.9 0.95 0.

Delta-dv 99th 98

dv) (dv) (d

.98 2.74 2.

.33 3.03 2

4 1.98 1.

.15 2.24 1

.09 1.59 1.

.24 1.06 0.

.61 1.18 0.

.98 1.86 1.

.23 1.02 0.

.89 1.19 0.

.87 0.93 0.

PY

Delta-dv 99th 98

dv) (dv) (d

.02 0.01 0.

.03 0.01 0.

.02 0.01

.01 0

.01 0

.01 0

.01 0

.01 0

.01 0

.01 0

0 0

24 TPY

rom WRAP Web

x = 80 TPY; PM =

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

8th Days

dv) > 0.5 dv

20

.51 338 3

.64 313 2

.59 136 1

.82 173 2

.31 117 1

.79 49 0

.01 74 1

.51 172 1

.87 67 0

.88 56 0

.79 54 0

8th Days

dv) > 0.5 dv

20

.24 290 2

2.4 280 2

.52 126 1

.7 156 1

.25 107 1

.77 42 0

.94 71 0

.46 161 1

.82 63 0

.85 51 0

.76 51 0

8th Days

dv) > 0.5 dv

20

.01 0 0

.01 0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

98

98

bsite

= 2,225 TPY

98

F: 415‐899‐070

001 2002

.01

.46

.84

2.1

.43

.93

.02

.39

.98

.77

0.8

001 2002

.74

2.4

.71

.95

.38

.91

.99

.29

.96

.74

.78

001 2002

.01

.01

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

8th Percentile fo

0.01

0.01

0

0

0

0

0

1.23

0.74

0.9

0.64

0.98

1.13

0.66

0.91

2.29

1.22

0.79

0.92

0.67

0.93

1.29

1.66

0.66

8th Percentile fo

1.42

1.05

1.21

2.02

2.42

8th Percentile fo

7

3 

Av

2.51

2.83

1.54

2.15

1.22

0.74

0.91

1.77

0.64

0.71

0.71

3 

Av

2.3

2.47

1.43

1.99

1.16

0.71

0.88

1.66

0.62

0.68

0.69

3 

Av

0.01

0.01

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

r each Year

2003

1

1

3

4

4

8

3

6

1

9

2

9

2

7

3

9

6

6

r each Year

2003

2003

2

5

1

2

2

r each Year

98th 

Year

verage

2.51

2.57

1.6

1.77

1.28

0.78

0.96

1.49

0.8

0.8

0.72

98th 

Year

verage

2.23

2.39

1.46

1.64

1.22

0.76

0.93

1.39

0.78

0.78

0.7

98th 

Year

verage

0.01

0.01

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
SRC05 ASA

gali Galiu

supe Supe

sian Sierra

sagu Sagua

maza Maza

moba Moun

pimo Pine 

chir Chiric

gila Gila W

pefo Petrif

syca Syca

SRC05 ASA

gali Galiu

supe Supe

sian Sierra

sagu Sagua

maza Maza

moba Moun

pimo Pine 

chir Chiric

gila Gila W

pefo Petrif

syca Syca

Class I Area

Class I Area

773 Sa

ARCO – Hayden S

ro Wilderness

rstition Wildernes

a Ancha Wilderne

aro NM

atzal Wilderness

nt Baldy Wildernes

Mountain Wildern

cahua NM

Wilderness

fied Forest NP

more Canyon WA

ARCO – Hayden S

ro Wilderness

rstition Wildernes

a Ancha Wilderne

aro NM

atzal Wilderness

nt Baldy Wildernes

Mountain Wildern

cahua NM

Wilderness

fied Forest NP

more Canyon WA

a

a

an Marin Drive,

Smelter: PM On

Minimum 

(km

47

ss 49

ess 84

86

121

ss 151

ness 167

169

186

215

A 239

Smelter: NOx + 

Minimum 

(km

47

ss 49

ess 84

86

121

ss 151

ness 167

169

186

215

A 239

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

ly: PM = 2,225 T

Distance Max D

m) (d

7 0

9 0

4 0

6 0

1 0

1 0

7 0

9 0

6 0

5 0

9 0

PM Only: NOx =

Distance Max D

m) (d

7 0

9 0

4 0

6 0

1 0

1 0

7 0

9 0

6 0

5 0

9 0

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

11

TPY

Delta-dv 99th 98

dv) (dv) (d

0.9 0.63 0.

.81 0.52 0.

.35 0.17 0.

.52 0.31 0.

0.2 0.11 0.

.11 0.05 0.

.12 0.07 0.

.25 0.15 0.

.11 0.06 0.

.11 0.04 0.

.06 0.03 0.

= 80 TPY; PM = 2

Delta-dv 99th 98

dv) (dv) (d

0.9 0.64 0.

.82 0.52 0.

.35 0.18 0.

.52 0.31 0.

0.2 0.11 0.

.12 0.05 0.

.12 0.07 0.

.25 0.15 0.

.12 0.06 0.

.12 0.05 0.

.06 0.03 0.

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

8th Days

dv) > 0.5 dv

20

.53 34 0

.42 14 0

.13 0 0

.25 1 0

.09 0 0

.04 0 0

.05 0 0

.12 0 0

.05 0 0

.04 0 0

.03 0 0

2,225 TPY

8th Days

dv) > 0.5 dv

20

.53 35 0

.42 14 0

.13 0 0

.25 1 0

.09 0 0

.04 0 0

.05 0 0

.12 0 0

.05 0 0

.04 0 0

.03 0 0

98

98

F: 415‐899‐070

001 2002

.53

.42

.15

.27

.09

.04

.05

.12

.05

.03

.03

001 2002

.53

.42

.15

.27

.09

.04

.05

.12

.05

.04

.03

0.04

0.03

0.14

0.08

0.04

0.06

0.12

0.06

0.12

0.06

0.12

0.06

0.04

0.03

0.51

8th Percentile fo

0.52

0.43

0.43

0.11

0.14

0.08

0.04

8th Percentile fo

7

3 

Av

0.55

0.4

0.13

0.29

0.09

0.03

0.05

0.14

0.05

0.04

0.02

3 

Av

0.55

0.4

0.13

0.29

0.09

0.04

0.05

0.14

0.05

0.04

0.02

4

3

4

8

4

6

2

6

2

6

2

6

4

3

1

r each Year

2003

2

3

3

1

4

8

4

r each Year

2003

98th 

Year

verage

0.53

0.41

0.13

0.23

0.09

0.04

0.05

0.13

0.05

0.04

0.03

98th 

Year

verage

0.53

0.42

0.13

0.23

0.09

0.04

0.06

0.13

0.05

0.04

0.03
773 Sa

Asarco

Updated

n Marin Drive,

Hayden Fa

CALPUFF M

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

ATTA

acility Visib

Modeling u

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

12

ACHMENT

bility Impa

using Origi

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

T B

acts at Clas

inal WRAP

F: 415‐899‐070

ss I Areas f

P RMC Emi

7

from  

issions
gali Ga

supe Su

sian Sie

sagu Sa

maza Ma

moba Mo

pimo Pin

chir Ch

gila Gi

pefo Pe

syca Sy

gali Ga

supe Su

sian Sie

sagu Sa

maza Ma

moba Mo

pimo Pin

chir Ch

gila Gi

pefo Pe

syca Sy

gali Ga

supe Su

sian Sie

sagu Sa

maza Ma

moba Mo

pimo Pin

chir Ch

gila Gi

pefo Pe

syca Sy

Class I Area

Class I Area

Class I Area

773 Sa

aliuro Wilderness

uperstition Wilderne

erra Ancha Wildern

aguaro NM

azatzal Wilderness

ount Baldy Wilderne

ne Mountain Wilder

hiricahua NM

la Wilderness

etrified Forest NP

ycamore Canyon W

aliuro Wilderness

uperstition Wilderne

erra Ancha Wildern

aguaro NM

azatzal Wilderness

ount Baldy Wilderne

ne Mountain Wilder

hiricahua NM

la Wilderness

etrified Forest NP

ycamore Canyon W

aliuro Wilderness

uperstition Wilderne

erra Ancha Wildern

aguaro NM

azatzal Wilderness

ount Baldy Wilderne

ne Mountain Wilder

hiricahua NM

la Wilderness

etrified Forest NP

ycamore Canyon W

SR

an Marin Drive,

Minimum D

(km

47

ess 49

ess 84

86

121

ess 151

rness 167

169

186

215

WiA 239

Minimum D

(km

47

ess 49

ess 84

86

121

ess 151

rness 167

169

186

215

WiA 239

Minimum D

(km

47

ess 49

ess 84

86

121

ess 151

rness 167

169

186

215

WiA 239

SRC05 

RC05 ASARCO – H

SRC05 A

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

Distance Max Del

) (dv)

5.32

5.70

4.18

5.64

4.13

2.37

7 2.70

9 3.23

6 2.34

5 3.01

9 1.87

Distance Max Del

) (dv)

5.11

5.33

4.11

5.37

4.07

2.33

7 2.64

9 3.14

6 2.25

5 2.97

9 1.84

Distance Max Del

) (dv)

0.02

0.03

0.02

0.01

0.01

0.01

7 0.01

9 0.01

6 0.01

5 0.01

9 0.00

2012 Re‐run

ASARCO – Hayde

Hayden Smelter: S

ASARCO – Hayden

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

13

ta-dv 99th

) (dv)

2 3.21

0 3.25

8 2.00

4 2.39

3 1.70

7 1.09

0 1.27

3 1.90

4 1.12

1 1.21

7 0.99

ta-dv 99th

) (dv)

1 2.84

3 3.00

1 1.90

7 2.27

7 1.59

3 1.05

4 1.21

4 1.85

5 1.07

7 1.18

4 0.96

ta-dv 99th

) (dv)

2 0.01

3 0.01

2 0.01

1 0.00

1 0.00

1 0.00

1 0.00

1 0.00

1 0.00

1 0.00

0 0.00

n Results ‐ Old Emi

en Smelter: NOx O

SO2 = 36,524 TPY;

 Smelter: SO2 On

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

98th Days

(dv) > 0.5 dv

2.47 349

2.52 323

1.56 145

1.84 183

1.34 126

0.80 53

0.99 82

1.51 178

0.85 81

0.85 61

0.80 60

98th Days

(dv) > 0.5 dv

2.19 296

2.35 292

1.50 132

1.69 166

1.32 118

0.78 47

0.95 79

1.45 165

0.83 73

0.82 54

0.78 58

98th Days

(dv) > 0.5 dv

0.01 0

0.01 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

ssions

Only: NOx = 79 TP

; NOx = 79 TPY; P

nly: SO2 = 36,524 T

F: 415‐899‐070

98th Percentile 

v

2001 200

3.31 2.0

2.52 2.4

1.85 1.4

2.31 1.0

1.59 1.2

0.98 0.6

1.24 0.9

1.51 1.3

1.12 0.7

0.78 0.9

0.92 0.6

98th Percentile 

v

2001 200

3.21 1.6

2.43 2.3

1.72 1.2

2.13 1.0

1.57 1.1

0.96 0.6

1.20 0.9

1.45 1.2

1.07 0.7

0.76 0.9

0.91 0.6

98th Percentile 

v

2001 200

0.01 0.0

0.01 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.01 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

PY

M = 2,225 TPY

TPY

7

for each Year

3

02 2003 Av

02 2.52

46 2.82

43 1.56

07 2.15

23 1.23

69 0.76

93 0.96

30 1.81

79 0.65

95 0.73

66 0.72

for each Year

3

02 2003 Av

66 2.24

33 2.50

23 1.47

00 2.00

5 1.20

68 0.73

91 0.92

26 1.69

76 0.64

92 0.70

65 0.70

for each Year

3

02 2003 Av

01 0.00

01 0.01

00 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

98th 

3 Year

verage

2.61

2.60

1.61

1.84

1.35

0.81

1.04

1.54

0.85

0.82

0.77

98th 

3 Year

verage

2.37

2.42

1.47

1.71

1.30

0.79

1.01

1.46

0.82

0.79

0.75

98th 

3 Year

verage

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00
gali Ga

supe Su

sian Sie

sagu Sa

maza Ma

moba Mo

pimo Pin

chir Ch

gila Gi

pefo Pe

syca Sy

gali Ga

supe Su

sian Sie

sagu Sa

maza Ma

moba Mo

pimo Pin

chir Ch

gila Gi

pefo Pe

syca Sy

Class I Area

Class I Area

773 Sa

aliuro Wilderness

uperstition Wilderne

erra Ancha Wildern

aguaro NM

azatzal Wilderness

ount Baldy Wilderne

ne Mountain Wilder

hiricahua NM

la Wilderness

etrified Forest NP

ycamore Canyon W

aliuro Wilderness

uperstition Wilderne

erra Ancha Wildern

aguaro NM

azatzal Wilderness

ount Baldy Wilderne

ne Mountain Wilder

hiricahua NM

la Wilderness

etrified Forest NP

ycamore Canyon W

S

an Marin Drive,

Minimum D

(km

47

ess 49

ess 84

86

121

ess 151

rness 167

169

186

215

WiA 239

Minimum D

(km

47

ess 49

ess 84

86

121

ess 151

rness 167

169

186

215

WiA 239

SRC05 

SRC05 ASARCO – 

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

Distance Max Del

) (dv)

0.90

0.83

0.34

0.51

0.20

0.11

7 0.12

9 0.25

6 0.11

5 0.11

9 0.06

Distance Max Del

) (dv)

0.90

0.84

0.35

0.52

0.20

0.12

7 0.12

9 0.25

6 0.12

5 0.12

9 0.06

ASARCO – Hayde

Hayden Smelter: 

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

14

ta-dv 99th

) (dv)

0 0.62

3 0.51

4 0.17

1 0.31

0 0.11

1 0.05

2 0.06

5 0.15

1 0.06

1 0.04

6 0.03

ta-dv 99th

) (dv)

0 0.63

4 0.52

5 0.17

2 0.31

0 0.11

2 0.05

2 0.07

5 0.15

2 0.06

2 0.05

6 0.03

en Smelter: PM On

NOx + PM Only: N

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

98th Days

(dv) > 0.5 dv

0.52 33

0.41 14

0.12 0

0.23 1

0.09 0

0.03 0

0.05 0

0.12 0

0.05 0

0.03 0

0.03 0

98th Days

(dv) > 0.5 dv

0.52 34

0.41 15

0.12 0

0.23 1

0.09 0

0.04 0

0.05 0

0.12 0

0.05 0

0.04 0

0.03 0

nly: PM = 2,225 TP

NOx = 79 TPY; PM

F: 415‐899‐070

98th Percentile 

v

2001 200

0.55 0.5

0.41 0.4

0.15 0.1

0.27 0.1

0.09 0.0

0.04 0.0

0.05 0.0

0.12 0.1

0.05 0.0

0.03 0.0

0.03 0.0

98th Percentile 

v

2001 200

0.55 0.5

0.42 0.4

0.15 0.1

0.27 0.1

0.09 0.0

0.04 0.0

0.05 0.0

0.12 0.1

0.05 0.0

0.04 0.0

0.03 0.0

PY

M = 2,225 TPY

7

for each Year

3

02 2003 Av

52 0.55

43 0.41

1 0.13

4 0.29

08 0.09

04 0.03

06 0.05

2 0.14

06 0.05

04 0.04

03 0.02

for each Year

3

02 2003 Av

52 0.55

44 0.41

2 0.14

4 0.29

08 0.09

04 0.04

06 0.05

2 0.14

06 0.05

04 0.04

03 0.02

98th 

3 Year

verage

0.54

0.42

0.13

0.23

0.09

0.04

0.05

0.13

0.05

0.04

0.03

98th 

3 Year

verage

0.54

0.42

0.14

0.23

0.09

0.04

0.05

0.13

0.05

0.04

0.03
Upda

773 Sa

Asarco

ated CALPU

an Marin Drive,

Hayden Fa

UFF Model

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

ATTA

acility Visib

ling using

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

15

ACHMENT

bility Impa

Revised Em

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

T C

acts at Clas

missions fr

F: 415‐899‐070

ss I Areas f

rom Asarc

7

from  

o (Jan 2013)
gali Ga

supe Su

sian Sie

sagu Sa

maza Ma

moba Mo

pimo Pin

chir Ch

gila Gi

pefo Pe

syca Sy

gali Ga

supe Su

sian Sie

sagu Sa

maza Ma

moba Mo

pimo Pin

chir Ch

gila Gi

pefo Pe

syca Sy

gali Ga

supe Su

sian Sie

sagu Sa

maza Ma

moba Mo

pimo Pin

chir Ch

gila Gi

pefo Pe

syca Sy

Class I Area

Class I Area

Class I Area

773 Sa

aliuro Wilderness

uperstition Wilderne

erra Ancha Wildern

aguaro NM

azatzal Wilderness

ount Baldy Wilderne

ne Mountain Wilder

hiricahua NM

la Wilderness

etrified Forest NP

ycamore Canyon W

aliuro Wilderness

uperstition Wilderne

erra Ancha Wildern

aguaro NM

azatzal Wilderness

ount Baldy Wilderne

ne Mountain Wilder

hiricahua NM

la Wilderness

etrified Forest NP

ycamore Canyon W

aliuro Wilderness

uperstition Wilderne

erra Ancha Wildern

aguaro NM

azatzal Wilderness

ount Baldy Wilderne

ne Mountain Wilder

hiricahua NM

la Wilderness

etrified Forest NP

ycamore Canyon W

S

an Marin Drive,

Minimum D

(km

47

ess 49

ess 84

86

121

ess 151

rness 167

169

186

215

WiA 239

Minimum D

(km

47

ess 49

ess 84

86

121

ess 151

rness 167

169

186

215

WiA 239

Minimum D

(km

47

ess 49

ess 84

86

121

ess 151

rness 167

169

186

215

WiA 239

SRC05 

SRC05 ASARCO – 

SRC05 A

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

Distance Max Del

) (dv)

2.47

3.69

2.78

3.92

1.93

1.69

7 1.79

9 2.54

6 1.52

5 2.31

9 1.15

Distance Max Del

) (dv)

2.47

3.67

2.77

3.91

1.91

1.69

7 1.78

9 2.54

6 1.51

5 2.30

9 1.15

Distance Max Del

) (dv)

0.02

0.03

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

7 0.01

9 0.01

6 0.01

5 0.01

9 0.01

ASARCO – Hayde

Hayden Smelter: 

ASARCO – Hayden

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

16

ta-dv 99th

) (dv)

7 1.89

9 1.76

8 1.18

2 1.33

3 1.00

9 0.67

9 0.70

4 1.20

2 0.75

1 0.79

5 0.63

ta-dv 99th

) (dv)

7 1.87

7 1.75

7 1.16

1 1.32

1 0.99

9 0.67

8 0.70

4 1.19

1 0.75

0 0.79

5 0.63

ta-dv 99th

) (dv)

2 0.01

3 0.01

1 0.01

1 0.00

1 0.00

1 0.00

1 0.00

1 0.00

1 0.00

1 0.00

1 0.00

en Smelter: NOx O

SO2 = 23971 TPY

n Smelter: SO2 On

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

98th Days

(dv) > 0.5 dv

1.39 175

1.40 159

0.85 65

1.06 88

0.75 53

0.51 25

0.55 31

0.90 87

0.53 27

0.55 27

0.45 16

98th Days

(dv) > 0.5 dv

1.38 167

1.39 155

0.84 65

1.06 87

0.75 53

0.50 25

0.55 30

0.90 86

0.52 26

0.55 27

0.45 16

98th Days

(dv) > 0.5 dv

0.01 0

0.01 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

Only: NOx = 79 TP

Y; NOx = 79 TPY; P

nly: SO2 = 23971 T

F: 415‐899‐070

98th Percentile 

v

2001 200

1.89 1.0

1.56 1.2

0.89 0.7

1.26 0.6

0.91 0.7

0.58 0.4

0.65 0.5

0.93 0.7

0.78 0.4

0.58 0.5

0.49 0.4

98th Percentile 

v

2001 200

1.88 1.0

1.53 1.2

0.88 0.7

1.25 0.6

0.90 0.7

0.58 0.4

0.65 0.5

0.93 0.7

0.77 0.4

0.57 0.5

0.49 0.4

98th Percentile 

v

2001 200

0.01 0.0

0.01 0.0

0.01 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

PY

PM = 155 TPY

TPY

7

for each Year

3

02 2003 Av

04 1.63

28 1.41

75 0.85

66 1.30

71 0.75

43 0.43

50 0.54

77 1.14

47 0.41

56 0.51

42 0.45

for each Year

3

02 2003 Av

04 1.63

26 1.41

75 0.84

66 1.29

71 0.75

43 0.43

50 0.54

75 1.13

47 0.41

55 0.51

42 0.45

for each Year

3

02 2003 Av

01 0.01

01 0.01

00 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

98th 

3 Year

verage

1.52

1.42

0.83

1.07

0.79

0.48

0.57

0.94

0.55

0.55

0.45

98th 

3 Year

verage

1.52

1.40

0.83

1.07

0.78

0.48

0.56

0.94

0.55

0.54

0.45

98th 

3 Year

verage

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00
gali Ga

supe Su

sian Sie

sagu Sa

maza Ma

moba Mo

pimo Pin

chir Ch

gila Gi

pefo Pe

syca Sy

gali Ga

supe Su

sian Sie

sagu Sa

maza Ma

moba Mo

pimo Pin

chir Ch

gila Gi

pefo Pe

syca Sy

Class I Area

Class I Area

773 Sa

aliuro Wilderness

uperstition Wilderne

erra Ancha Wildern

aguaro NM

azatzal Wilderness

ount Baldy Wilderne

ne Mountain Wilder

hiricahua NM

la Wilderness

etrified Forest NP

ycamore Canyon W

aliuro Wilderness

uperstition Wilderne

erra Ancha Wildern

aguaro NM

azatzal Wilderness

ount Baldy Wilderne

ne Mountain Wilder

hiricahua NM

la Wilderness

etrified Forest NP

ycamore Canyon W

an Marin Drive,

Minimum D

(km

47

ess 49

ess 84

86

121

ess 151

rness 167

169

186

215

WiA 239

Minimum D

(km

47

ess 49

ess 84

86

121

ess 151

rness 167

169

186

215

WiA 239

SRC05

SRC05 ASARCO –

Suite 2115, Nov

www.e

Distance Max Del

) (dv)

0.07

0.08

0.02

0.03

0.02

0.01

7 0.01

9 0.04

6 0.01

5 0.01

9 0.00

Distance Max Del

) (dv)

0.08

0.08

0.03

0.04

0.02

0.01

7 0.01

9 0.04

6 0.02

5 0.01

9 0.01

5 ASARCO – Hayd

– Hayden Smelter

vato, CA 94998 P

environcorp.com

17

ta-dv 99th

) (dv)

7 0.05

8 0.04

2 0.01

3 0.02

2 0.01

1 0.00

1 0.00

4 0.01

1 0.00

1 0.00

0 0.00

ta-dv 99th

) (dv)

8 0.05

8 0.05

3 0.01

4 0.02

2 0.01

1 0.01

1 0.01

4 0.01

2 0.01

1 0.01

1 0.00

en Smelter: PM O

r: NOx + PM Only: 

P: 415‐899‐0700

m

98th Days

(dv) > 0.5 dv

0.04 0

0.03 0

0.01 0

0.01 0

0.01 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.01 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

98th Days

(dv) > 0.5 dv

0.04 0

0.04 0

0.01 0

0.01 0

0.01 0

0.00 0

0.01 0

0.01 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

0.00 0

Only: PM = 155 TPY

NOx = 79 TPY; PM

F: 415‐899‐070

98th Percentile 

v

2001 200

0.04 0.0

0.04 0.0

0.01 0.0

0.01 0.0

0.01 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.01 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

98th Percentile 

v

2001 200

0.04 0.0

0.04 0.0

0.01 0.0

0.02 0.0

0.01 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.01 0.0

0.01 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

0.00 0.0

Y

M = 155 TPY

7

for each Year

3

02 2003 Av

03 0.04

03 0.03

01 0.01

01 0.01

01 0.01

00 0.00

00 0.00

01 0.01

00 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

for each Year

3

02 2003 Av

04 0.04

04 0.04

01 0.01

01 0.02

01 0.01

00 0.00

01 0.01

01 0.01

01 0.00

00 0.00

00 0.00

98th 

3 Year

verage

0.04

0.04

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.00

98th 

3 Year

verage

0.04

0.04

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.00