alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Inocencia Luna, Plaintiff-Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Mark Angeli and Citibank, N.A., Defendants-Respondents.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Joseph E. Capella, J.), entered on or about February 23, 2016, after trial, in favor of defendants dismissing the action.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment (Joseph E. Capella, J.), entered on or about February 23, 2016, affirmed, without costs. </p><p>The record establishes that the trial court applied the appropriate rules and principles of substantive law and accomplished "substantial justice" in dismissing plaintiff's action for "defective services rendered" and breach of contract (<i>see </i>CCA 1804, 1807; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125, 126 [2000], <i>lv dismissed</i> 95 NY2d 898 [2000]). A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the trial court's findings that plaintiff failed to establish that defendant Citibank, N.A. owed her any excess funds following plaintiff's repayment of a loan. The action was also properly dismissed against defendant Mark Angeli, since he was acting solely in his representative capacity as an employee of Citibank and not in his individual capacity in connection with the loan agreement at issue.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: January 16, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
II 

Calendar No. 298 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1961 

To extend and expand the Child Safety Pilot Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2005 

Mr. BIDEN (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. CORNYN, and Mr. AKAKA) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

NOVEMBER 17, 2005 

Reported by Mr. SPECTER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To extend and expand the Child Safety Pilot Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Extending the Child 

5 Safety Pilot Program Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 1961 RS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE CHILD SAFETY PILOT PRO2 GRAM. 

3 Section 108 of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 5119a 

4 note) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)— 

6 (A) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ‘‘A 

7 volunteer organization in a participating State 

8 may not submit background check requests 

9 under paragraph (3).’’; 

10 (B) in paragraph (3)— 

11 (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

12 ‘‘a 30-month’’ and inserting: ‘‘a 60- 

13 month’’; 

14 (ii) by striking subparagraph (B) and 

15 inserting the following: 

16 ‘‘(B) PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS.— 

17 ‘‘(i) ELIGIBLE ORGANIZATIONS.—Eli18 gible organizations include— 

19 ‘‘(I) the Boys and Girls Clubs of 

20 America; 

21 ‘‘(II) the MENTOR/National 

22 Mentoring Partnership; 

23 ‘‘(III) the National Council of 

24 Youth Sports; and 

25 ‘‘(IV) any nonprofit organization 

26 that provides care, as that term is de-
3 

•S 1961 RS

1 fined in section 5 of the National 

2 Child Protection Act of 1993 (42 

3 U.S.C. 5119c), for children. 

4 ‘‘(ii) PILOT PROGRAM.—The eligibility 

5 of an organization described in clause 

6 (i)(IV) to participate in the pilot program 

7 established under this section shall be de8 termined by the National Center for Miss9 ing and Exploited Children according to 

10 criteria established by such Center, includ11 ing the potential number of applicants and 

12 suitability of the organization to the intent 

13 of this section.’’; 

14 (iii) by striking subparagraph (C) and 

15 inserting the following: 

16 ‘‘(C) APPLICANTS FROM PARTICIPATING

17 ORGANIZATIONS.—Participating organizations 

18 may request background checks on applicants 

19 for positions as volunteers and employees who 

20 will be working with children or supervising vol21 unteers.’’; 

22 (iv) in subparagraph (D), by striking 

23 ‘‘the organizations described in subpara24 graph (C)’’ and inserting ‘‘participating or25 ganizations’’; and 
4 

•S 1961 RS

1 (v) in subparagraph (F), by striking 

2 ‘‘14 business days’’ and inserting ‘‘10 busi3 ness days’’; and 

4 (2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘and 2005’’ 

5 and inserting ‘‘through 2008’’. 

Calendar No. 298 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1961 

A BILL 

To extend and expand the Child Safety Pilot 

Program. 

NOVEMBER 17, 2005 

Reported without amendment
No. 00-7322.

#### Greene *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 49213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24874]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-521-000]


Garden Banks Gas Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

September 15, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 11, 1997, Garden Banks Gas Pipeline, 
LLC (GBGP) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, Second Revised Sheet No. 106, to become effective October 
11, 1997.
    GBGP states that the purpose of this filing is to reflect a change 
in the time period from one month to twenty-eight days from the time 
the first release period has ended after which pre-arranged capacity 
releases for terms of 31 days or less and at less than the maximum 
tariff rate can be re-released to the same replacement shipper at less 
than the maximum tariff rate, in conformance with section 284.243(h)(2) 
of the Commission's Regulations.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions and protests must be filed in 
accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24874 Filed 9-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 173 (Monday, September 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47207-47208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23721]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY


Open Meeting, Board of Visitors for the Emergency Management 
Institute

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, FEMA announces the following committee 
meeting:
    Name: Board of Visitors for the Emergency Management Institute.
    Dates of Meeting: September 25-26, 1997.
    Place: Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Emergency 
Training Center, Emergency Management Institute, Conference Room, 
Building N, Room 408, Emmitsburg, Maryland 21727 and Mt. Weather 
Emergency Assistance Center (MWEAC), Building 430, Berryville, 
Virginia.
    Time: Thursday, September 25, 1997 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m. (NETC); 
Friday, September 26, 1997, 8:30 a.m.-10:30 a.m. (NETC); Friday, 
September 26, 1997, 11:30 a.m.-3:00 p.m. (MWEAC).
    Proposed Agenda: Status reports on training in response and 
recovery, planning, mitigation, and simulation and exercises; informal 
working sessions regarding EMI activities; and preparing information 
for the BOV 1997 Annual Report.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public with 
approximately 10 seats available on a first-come, first-serve basis. 
Members of the general public who plan to attend the meeting should 
contact the Office of the Superintendent, Emergency

[[Page 47208]]

Management Institute, 16825 South Seton Avenue, Emmitsburg, MD 21727, 
(301) 447-1286.
    Minutes of the meeting will be prepared and will be available for 
public viewing in the Office of the Superintendent, Emergency 
Management Institute, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Building N, 
National Emergency Training Center, Emmitsburg, MD 21727. Copies of the 
minutes will be available upon request 30 days after the meeting.

    Dated: August 27, 1997.
Kay C. Goss,
Associate Director, Preparedness, Training, and Exercises Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-23721 Filed 9-5-97: 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-01-P-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED 6/30/97 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   11-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          31,668
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,487
<INVENTORY>                                     13,921
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,819
<PP&E>                                          22,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,283
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        81,075
<OTHER-SE>                                    (36,695)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,377
<SALES>                                        101,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               101,924
<CGS>                                           47,571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,178
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  55
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,166
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,489
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                676
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       676
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1











WRITTEN
STATEMENT


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with this Quarterly Report of China 3C Group and its subsidiaries
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Zhenggang Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





August
      14, 2009/s/ Zhenggang WangZhenggang
      WangChief
      Executive Officer and Chairman(Principal
      Executive Officer)
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Shell Keys

National Wildlife Refuge

Draft

Comprehensive Conservation Plan

and Environmental Assessment

Draft

Comprehensive Conservation Plan

and Environmental Assessment

Shell Keys

National Wildlife Refuge

USFWS Photo
Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long-term guidance for

management decisions; set forth goals, objectives, and strategies

needed to accomplish refuge purposes; and identify the Fish and

Wildlife Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail

program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above

current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service

strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans

do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational

and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e) AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Joshua Pickus, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Niku Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                          |  |                        
|------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: September 13, 2004 |  | /s/ JOSHUA PICKUS      
|                          |  | Joshua Pickus          
|                          |  | Chief Executive Officer
### Ground-water outflow from Chino Basin, Upper Santa Ana Valley, southern California

By: James J. French

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1999G

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# DSCR Fire, Emergency Services leads the way

/ Published Dec. 21, 2017
Richmond, Va, 
Defense Logistics Agency Installation Operations at Richmond’s Fire and Emergency Services on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, is on a roll after winning DLA Fire Department of the Year for the second year running and earning the title of Fire Prevention Program of the Year. 

Blazing a trail and with a reputation for excellent community service, the F&EMS team led the way in setting a higher response time, besting the Department of Defense standard with a new benchmark of six minutes or less on 90 percent of responses. 

During the previous fiscal year, the department responded to numerous structure fires via an automated agreement with Chesterfield County, most notably a mutual aid response to a local chemical processing plant fire reducing the impact to the environment. 

“Our contribution throughout the community is always present,” said Fire Chief, Robert Cross. “We’ve received the annual Commander-in-Chief’s Award for Installation Excellence by providing superior service to installation employees more than once.” 

Part of their annual contribution included administering more than 630 flu shots to employees on the installation. 

The department assisted in more than 125 worldwide callers on the DoD Hazardous Materials hotline, providing pertinent information for chemical emergencies and other information. 

In addition to their everyday duties, the department hosted the first Hazardous Materials Regional Expo attended by six jurisdictional partners, and supported the Wounded Warrior Program by aiding the McGuire Veteran Affairs Medical Center with assessing a soldier’s cognitive skill for returning back into the community. They also hosted four Fort Lee Advanced Individual Training soldiers at the Fire Station for Thanksgiving. 

The department earned the title of DLA Fire Prevention Program of the Year for its work reducing the installation’s life safety hazards, overseeing inspections of approximately $200 million dollars of hazardous materials storage, reviewing 74 facility projects valued at $54.3 million and accepting three major fire protection systems valued at more than $27 million in facility and mission assets.  Having a strong community and public education program, Cross said the fire prevention office developed and delivered a comprehensive Fire Warden Training Program, taught 25 fire safety classes reaching 1,100 installation employees, and provided staff training as part of the installation Child Development Center’s accreditation to operate.
#### In re REICHHOLD CHEMICALS, INC. v. James W. McDANIEL et al. Ex parte James W. McDANIEL et al.

77-325.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 4, 1978.

William J. Donald, III of Zeanah, Donald & Hust, Tuscaloosa, for petitioners.

C. V. Stelzenmuller and J. Patrick Logan, Birmingham, for respondent, Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.

George Gocoris, Gen. Counsel, Dept, of Industrial Relations, State of Alabama, Montgomery, for Director of Industrial Relations, State Dept, of Labor, respondent.

Fournier J. Gale, III and Cathy S. Wright, Birmingham, for amicus curiae, Associated Industries of Alabama, Inc.

James P. Alexander and Stephen E. Brown, Birmingham, for amicus curiae, Jim Walter Resources, Inc.

BEATTY, Justice.

Writ quashed as improvidently granted.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, MADDOX, FAULKNER, ALMON, SHORES and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
No. 9366.

#### Holdren, Admr., et al. *v.*Holdren et al.

(Decided June 29, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Payette county.

*Messrs. Post é Reid,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Mills Gardner,*for defendants in error.

Judgment reversed. Ground stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be and the same hereby is reversed for error in computing and determining the specific amounts to be' paid by the administrator, and in ascertaining and determining the basis for distribution of. the proceeds arising from the sale of the real estate herein. And this court proceeding to render the judgment the circuit court should have rendered it is considered and adjudged that the judgment of the court of common pleas be and the same hereby is reversed for error in adjudging that the interest of Stanley Holdren in the real estate devised to him by the will of his *521father, John W. Holdren, is not subject to be charged, with the value of the life estate therein of Emma. Holdren, by way of compensation to the other devises under said will, because of the election of said Emma Holdren, not to take under said will. And this cause is remanded to the court of common pleas of Payette county with instructions to ascertain and determine the value of the life estate of the said Emma Holdren in the real estate devised to Stanley Holdren — the value of the dower estate of said Emma Holdren in the whole of the real estate devised by the will of her husband, John W. Holdren, — the amount and value of the personal property of said estate, and the amount of the debts of said estate including the specific legacies charged upon the real estate and the costs of administration. And when these several amounts shall have been ascertained, to order and direct that distribution be-made of the proceeds arising from the sale of the real estate as follows: 1. The debts, costs of administration and specific legacies charged on said real estate.- 2. To Emma Holdren the estimated value of her dower in the whole of the premises. 3. To the-devisees other than Stanley Holdren, the-amount found to be the value of the life estate of Emma Holdren together with the value of the personal property. 4. The residue one-sixth to William Holdren, one-sixth to Reuben Holdren, one-sixth to Lafayette Holdren, one-sixth to Ira Holdren, one-sixth to Stanley Holdren, and one-sixth to the children of Mattie Harper, as devisees under the-will of John W. Holdren.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers and Spear., JJ., concur.