alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23924]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-33-000]


El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

September 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, El Paso Natural Gas Company 
(El Paso) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1-A and First Revised Volume No. 2, the 
following tariff sheets to become effective October 1, 1997:

Second Revised Volume No. 1-A

Tenth Revised Sheet No. 20
Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 23
Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 24
Eleventh Revised Sheet No. 26
Tenth Revised Sheet Nos. 27 and 28
First Revised Sheet Nos. 37 and 38

Third Revised Volume No. 2

41st Revised Sheet No. 1-D.2
34th Revised Sheet No. 1-D.3

    El Paso states that the above tariff sheets are being filed to 
reflect that the Annual Charge Adjustment to be collected for the 
fiscal year beginning October 1, 1997 is to be $0.0021 per dth.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 
Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. 
All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23924 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1


                   Suncrest Global Energy Corp.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, John W. Peters, principal executive and financial officer of Suncrest
Global Energy Corp. certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that:

a.  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
    March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.  the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
    the Company.



Date: May 13, 2004                 /s/ John W. Peters
                                   _________________________________________
                                   John W. Peters
                                   Principal Executive and Financial Officer
### Magnitude and frequency of floods in the United States, part 8. Western Gulf of Mexico basins

By: James L. Patterson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1682

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### ANONYMOUS v. ANONYMOUS.

Civ. 901

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

Sept. 7, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 26, 1977.

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

Upon remand to this court by the Supreme Court of Alabama, the judgment of *520this court, entered January 20, 1977, 353 So.2d 510, is hereby set aside and the judgment of the trial court granting divorce to the husband upon the ground of adultery is affirmed. Judgment as to the custody of the minor child is reversed and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further hearing and consideration of the question of custody after due notice and opportunity to be heard is afforded all parties now joined or who may be properly joined hereafter.

At the request of appellant, she is hereby granted $1,000.00 as a reasonable attorney fee on appeal.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTION.

BRADLEY and HOLMES, JJ., concur.

Certiorari denied, Ala., 353 So.2d 520.
**-- !/,**  **/ I**  ***** **,: ‘** **c**

**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  **GROVDR SLLLLRS**  ***lro ”N.** ***QLNRAI.**

**.:onorabh 3.**  **P.** Whltm 2xlAty Judga .cirt.in County **.Jtacton, TOxa8** 

**>sar A.rr**  

### GpikllonNO. 0.7ou

-.iour letter ot **3x1** this **departnent~tte :ai1owe:** 
that OUT **COEL-**

*JohnT. iipleywas Clerkhero for **twenty** y&?&m prmore **preoedin%** hi8 death 

### rive ysera ‘~ ac;o. 28 operated thia abatraot firm in the **'Glork's** 0PZios and at tha the or hla death, air rife, Sire.Lanorah 3. &~iey, **war** ap9olnted to takehis plaoe and shehen continued to operatr this fin in thin ofrioe. Ahe is;ionorobla 13.3. White, page 2 **using** the County equipment, **utllitlaa,** and hired help that la being paidwith the fea from the orfloe to do this abatraot work. Pl6066 give us aA opinion as to the legality of her operating this firm in oonAaotionwith her County and Dlstrlot Clark'6 officei 6Ad also, give ua an opinion on the legality of the commissioners' court allowing this 0ffi06 to operate in the courthouaaand paying help and furnishing offloa equipmentand aup~liaa for the aama.6 In our @iAiOA No. O-921we held: "Themeking of abatraota of title is outside of the soope of the offlolalduties of the oounty olerk. The pro9ering and copyingof fieldnotes mey or mey not **be** carvicaawlthln the scope of the dutiaa of the office cf the oounty olerk; the fact6 in eaoh oesewill detmnine this queetion. "The oounty olarkhasAO authority to uaa county employees paid by the county toperform sarvioea outaide of the acopa of the duties of the offloe of oounty clerk. Labor paid for by the oounty shouldAot be ueed **Sy** the **clerk** in the performenoa of activities outside of th6 aoope of the **duties of**  hia ofl'ioe." It **?-~a3** held iA the Opinion Of YOAOrabl6B. F. LOOney t0 iionorsbleJ. J. StriOklsAd, dated **April 12,**  **1915:**

"It i6 a matter Of OOJILOOA knowledge that a aOU.rthouse la daaignad forpublio use eAd no one should be allowed, or permitted, to oooupy It exoept the public offioialaAemed in the statut6.v i hollowing the reasoning In the foregotig opinion by Eonorable 3, F. Looney and the case of Dodson V. lrlsrahall, 118 S.X. (26)621, writ dismissed,we held in OpinionNo. O-178 that the Conuaissioners~

Court waswithout authority to rent or lease offices in the courthouse. In view of the foregoing it is our OpfniOA that the OOuAty-, district clerk CeAAOt legally operate the abstraot plant iA her **Of?tOQ** :orat any other place iA the oourthouse. :ie:~OW of Go authority for theCommissioners* Court to expend county funds I'oroffice equipment and supplies t0 be. 

## -. 51

Zonorabl~ B. F. White, pa4363
used for purposes other then "countypUrpoaaaw. 

### LlorBovar, we know of no authority Sor a oounty offioar to **use tees**  **of** offloa topay help used by said

### officer for a purpoaa other than that of oarrylng out thedutlae and iUOtiOA8 of the offloe. your questions a?a therefore **answered** in the nagativa. Yours vary 

### truly, ATTORNLYGCi3NIiWOF lFZA.5

J2:J.J Aa8iStant



# PG

John Reeve6
Exhibit 32.2
 
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 6,
2008 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for
the periods referred to in the Form 10-Q.
 /s/ Alfred H. DrewesAlfred H. DrewesSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerOctober 14, 2008
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of State Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas F.
Goldrick, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


5/7/03                                      s/Thomas F. Goldrick, Jr.
-------                                     ----------------------------------
Date                                        Thomas F. Goldrick, Jr.,
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of State Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian K. Finneran,
Secretary/Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


5/7/03                                    s/Brian K. Finneran
-------                                   -------------------------------------
Date                                      Brian K. Finneran, Secretary/Treasurer
                                         (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT
32-1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund
V, L.P., Series 3 (the “Partnership”) for the year ended March 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief
Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the
Partnership, hereby certify that:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Partnership.
 
 
 
 /s/WILFRED N. COOPER,
JR.
  Wilfred
N. Cooper, Jr.
 President
and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
  Date:
June 29, 2010
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of I.N., F.N., and * From the 326th District Court

E.N., children, of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 10921-CX.

No. 11-24-00073-CV * August 8, 2024

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                         MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION

I, Richard H. Casper, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of DOLPHIN
PRODUCTIONS, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statement were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the"Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and the registrant's other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses.


                         DOLPHIN PRODUCTIONS, INC.

Date: May 7, 2004                     /s/ Pamela Lindquist

                                     --------------------------------
                                     Pamela Lindquist, Vice President
                                     and Principal Financial Officer
#### GULF HOTEL CORPORATION, Appellant, v. The HIALEAH-MIAMI SPRINGS BANK, Appellee.

No. 69-215.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 24, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
### Ground water in Musselshell and Golden Valley Counties, Montana

By: Arthur Jackson EllisOscar Edward Meinzer

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp518

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Willie R. FULLILOVE.

No. 60472.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 6, 1977.

In re: Willie R. Fullilove applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

SUMMERS, TATE and DIXON, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted.
EXHIBIT 31-1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Samuel Serritella, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report of Form 10-QSB of International
          Surfacing, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
          untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the period covered by this quarterly report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
          information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
          material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
          cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
          this quarterly report;

     4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
          and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
          for the registrant and we have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, is made known to me
          by others within the company, particularly during the period in which
          this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   Presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.   I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
          registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
          directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

     a)   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

     6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
          significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
          could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of
          our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
          regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 29, 2004

-------------------------------
Samuel Serritella
Chief Executive Officer
# L_2017110DE.01001001.xml

| 27.4.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 110/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2017

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 110/10

---

Berichtigung der Regelung Nr. 10 der Wirtschaftskommission der Vereinten Nationen für Europa (UNECE) — Einheitliche Bedingungen für die Genehmigung der Fahrzeuge hinsichtlich der elektromagnetischen Verträglichkeit [2017/260]

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 41 vom 17. Februar 2017
  )

Auf Seite 1, oben:

Anstatt:

„Die zweite Nummer dient nur als Beispiel. Nur die von der UNECE verabschiedeten Originalfassungen sind international rechtsverbindlich. Der Status dieser Regelung und das Datum ihres Inkrafttretens sind der neuesten Fassung des UNECE-Statusdokuments TRANS/WP.29/343 zu entnehmen, das von folgender Website abgerufen werden kann:“

muss es heißen:

„Nur die von der UNECE verabschiedeten Originalfassungen sind international rechtsverbindlich. Der Status dieser Regelung und das Datum ihres Inkrafttretens sind der neuesten Fassung des UNECE-Statusdokuments TRANS/WP.29/343 zu entnehmen, das von folgender Website abgerufen werden kann:“

---