alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 177 (Friday, September 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24187]



[[Page 48076]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-511-000]


Michigan Gas Storage Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

September 8, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 3, 1997, Michigan Gas Storage Company 
(MGS) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, the First Revised Sheet No. 69, to be effective October 
3, 1997. MGS states that the purpose of this filing is to reflect the 
requirements of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Order No. 
636-C. The filed sheet changes MGS's right-of-first-refusal contract 
term cap to five years.
    MGS states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers and applicable state regulatory agencies as well as 
on those on the official service list in RP96-290-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed in accordance 
with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24187 Filed 9-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Skystar Bio-Pharmaceutical Company, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael H. Lan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
 
 
 /s/ Michael H. LanMichael H. Lan

Chief Financial Officer

May 23, 2011
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CHRISTOPHER S. BOND 

MISSOURI 

APPROPRIATIONS 

SMALL BUSINESS lanitcd States Senate 

ENVIRONMENT AND 

PUBLIC VVOnKS WASHINGTON, DC 20510-2503 

INTELLIGENCE . . - ~n^ r\ 

August 5, 2010 

Dennis DeVany, Chief 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Room W86308 

1200 New Jersey, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Joplin Essential Air Funding 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

It has been brought to my attention that the US Department of Transportation recently 

received two proposals from different airlines to provide Essential Air Service to the Joplin 

Regional Airport. 

The City of Joplin and members of the community have carefully weighed each option 

and the impact each proposal will have on the Joplin community. As a result, the Joplin City 

Council unanimously selected a proposal that will best service the surrounding community by 

providing two daily flights to a larger airport on a schedule that will allow for the success of the 

airline. 

Please give the Joplin City Council recommendation full and favorable consideration 

when reviewing Essential Air Service for the community. 

Sincerely 

Christopher
256 La. 249

#### William C. O’NEILL v. D. H. HOLMES CO., Ltd.

No. 50559.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: William C. O Neill applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 232 So.2d 849.

Writ refused. There is no error of law in the judgment.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 19

- 00107

- CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

Trial Court No. 323

- 107000

- 18

Before Kerr, Pittman, a nd Birdwell, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### R.B. , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

Per Cur iam

Delivered: April 4 , 2019
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2146 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2006 

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To extend relocation expenses test programs for Federal 

employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

S 2146 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF RELOCATION EXPENSES TEST 

2 PROGRAMS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5739 of title 5, United 

4 States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘for a pe6 riod not to exceed 24 months’’; and 

7 (2) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘7 years’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘11 years’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section shall take effect as though enacted as part 

11 of the Travel and Transportation Reform Act of 1998 

12 (Public Law 105–264; 112 Stat. 2350). 

Passed the Senate August 1, 2006. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

**!ir. ceorge**  **Ii. aheppard**  Comptroller

of Publio Aocounts Auotiq,Texts Dear ~Sir:’ 0plnioaNo. 0 WI out of of a 3 of :;‘ub Se rooeivedyour questin our oginlon on a r80tftt -

Publio Safety pay the traveling priated to that departzmat, of 0en sent to Illlnola to roturn this

non’s AnnolxtodCivil Statutes, hereby oreeteda De?artmnt OS Publio Safsty of the Utate of Taxas, hereinaSter designated 08 ‘theDepart;aent,~ in whioh is vested the enforoemnt of the laws pcoteotin3the public! safety and providing for the prevention and deteotionof orlas.
. . .”Er. George H. ShopQard, page B

Artfole 4413 (4) of aafd statute8 reada a6 followe;

- “(1) mo Co.3Aasion shall rornulate plane and ~01IoIes for tha eniorOa!zent of the orlminal

laws and of the trnffioahd safety laws OS the State, tha Dreventioz **oi or5.m,**  **the detedtloa**  n?lB ap:>rehenslon

or violators

of the laws,and for tke eduoation OS the oltle?ns

of the State In the Dromtloa or publlo safety and law obaervanoe. "

. . . Smite Bill Ho. 427, 40th Legislature, Regular SewIon, page 197, BEZIM beiry the departnantal appropriation bill, reveala that the La&slatura -de an appropriation to the Departient

of Rub110 Safety ior traveland tramportation Said Senate Rlll, at pages 220-229,ln efl'sot ~%%?i ‘tIlat ne~boreOS the **various** state depart&ants, &a enumroted therein, may travelout of the State on State buekess ?urQosoe

a.ti shall reoeivethelr.travelIng axpenaes therein lnourrod. In OpinionNo. X-640, the Attorney oBneral*a Departmentadvisedthe Dsprt&ent of Publio Safety and the Comptroller

of PublioAocounts that the trip in question wan ior State buainclss purpoBe8. It Is olsarlythe duty OS the Department or ?uIjllo. %fetp to enforoethe oriainal lawn ?.nd

to deteotand oppreSend violators

of the law. The Legislature has providedthat department

with an apprcprlatloa nlth Wzloh to pny travelin;J expenses incurred in conmotion with We ~orformnOe of these duties. \Te

oonclude, thereiore, that the Department of Pub110 Sarety 1s authorized to expend,lts

funds to pay the traveling expenses3f.a Texas Ranger lnourredIn tha aforamentlonod trip. Yours very trUl7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM OUR THIRD
QUARTER 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          28,577
<SECURITIES>                                    40,425
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (341)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,377
<PP&E>                                          91,383
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,710)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,641
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,542
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,072
<SALES>                                          9,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,777
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,767)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,767)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,767)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.69)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          50,687
<SECURITIES>                                   100,586
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        222
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               157,944
<PP&E>                                          12,473
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,713
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,376
<BONDS>                                          3,537
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,966
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,155
<SALES>                                         93,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,078
<CGS>                                           80,904
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,855
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,542
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,313
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,313
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                          |   |                                         |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
| August                7, 2006 |   | /s/                Zhenggang Wang            |
|                          |   | Zhenggang                Wang                |
|                          |   | Chairman                of the Board &   |
|                          |   | Chief                Executive Officer       |
|                          |   | (Principal                Executive Officer) |
|                          |   |                                         |
|                          |   | /s/                Jian Liu                  |
|                          |   | Jian                Liu                      |
|                          |   | Chief                Financial Officer       |
|                          |   | (Principal                Financial Officer) |
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ROO Group, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Robin Smyth, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

            (1) the Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ ROBIN SMYTH
------------------------------------
Robin Smyth, Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 16, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 97F-0375]


General Electric Co.; Filing of Food Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that 
General Electric Co. has filed a petition proposing that the food 
additive regulations be amended to provide for the expanded safe use of 
phosphorous acid, cyclic butylethyl propanediol, 2,4,6-tri-tert-
butylphenyl ester, which may contain up to 1 percent by weight of 
triisopropanolamine, as an antioxidant and/or stabilizer in olefin 
copolymers intended for use in contact with food.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vir D. Anand, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-215), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 
St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-418-3081.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (sec. 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5))), notice is given that a food 
additive petition (FAP 7B4553) has been filed by General Electric Co., 
One Lexan Lane, Mt. Vernon, IN 47620-9364. The petition proposes to 
amend the food additive regulations in Sec. 178.2010 Antioxidants and/
or stabilizers for polymers (21 CFR 178.2010) to provide for the 
expanded safe use of phosphorous acid, cyclic butylethyl propanediol, 
2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenyl ester, which may contain up to 1 percent by 
weight of triisopropanolamine, as an antioxidant and/or stabilizer for 
olefin copolymers complying with 21 CFR 177.1520(c), items 3.1 and 3.2, 
intended for use in contact with food.
    The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(i) that this action is 
of the type that does not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an 
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is 
required.

    Dated: August 29, 1997.
Alan M. Rulis,
Director, Office of Premarket Approval, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 97-24424 Filed 9-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Ezenia! Inc. of our report dated February 3, 2000, included in the 1999
Annual Report to Shareholders of Ezenia! Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Ezenia! Inc. listed
in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion,
the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation
to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-3 No. 333-28209 and S-8 No. 333-85245) of Ezenia! Inc. and in the
related Prospectuses of our report dated February 3, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and our
report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Ezenia! Inc.

                                               /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 24, 2000

                                       22
#### James W. WALLACE et ux. v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.

No. 60114.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 6, 1977.

In re: State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Ouachita. 345 So.2d 1004.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24453]



[[Page 48639]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket Nos. RP97-275-007 and TM97-2-59-005]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

September 10, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 5, 1997, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets 
proposed to become effective on June 1, 1997:

2nd Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 61
2nd Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 62
2nd Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 63
2nd Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 64

    Northern states that the reason for this filing is to correct the 
unaccounted-for gas percent stated in the footnote of Substitute Fifth 
Revised Sheets Nos. 61-64, as filed on July 16, 1997, from 0.99 percent 
(0.0099) to 0.93 percent (0.0093).
    Northern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Northern's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. All 
protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24453 Filed 9-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47804-47805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24080]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-507-000]


Overthrust Pipeline Company; Notice of Tariff Filing

September 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 2, 1997, Overthrust Pipeline Company 
(Overthrust), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1-A, First Revised Sheet No. 56, to be effective 
October 1, 1997. Overthrust states that the filing is being filed in 
compliance with Ordering Paragraph (B) of Order No. 636-C issued 
February 27, 1997. Overthrust states that the proposed tariff sheet 
revises Sec. 9.4 of the General Terms and Conditions of its tariff by 
establishing a five-year contract matching-term cap for shippers 
exercising their right of first refusal.
    Overthrust states that a copy of this filing has been served upon 
its customers and the Wyoming Public Service Commission.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Secs. 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests must be filed 
in accordance with Sec. 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make

[[Page 47805]]

protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24080 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131710 & (21)(25)(28)(29)(31) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131710 

 COA: 266473 

Wayne CC: 68-048017-01

KENNEDY MATTHEWS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion to remand to add issues is DENIED. The 

motion requesting alternative relief for that motion is GRANTED, insofar as this Court 

has considered the substantive claims raised in the motion to remand. The application for 

leave to appeal the June 7, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is 

DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement 

to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motions to hold this case in abeyance are denied as 

moot. 

d1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk