alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 1
MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION
I, Pamela Lindquist, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of DOLPHIN PRODUCTIONS,
INC.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statement
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this quarterly report (the"Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
the registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


DOLPHIN PRODUCTIONS, INC.


Date: May 12, 2005                        /s/ Pamela Lindquist

                                              --------------------------------
                                              Pamela Lindquist, Vice President
                                              and Principal Financial Officer
Subject: Relationship B etween O zone 8-hour D esign V alues and W126 D esign V alues From: David Mintz OAR/OAQPS/AQAD/AQAG To: Ozone NAAQS Review Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-20 10

- 1076 ) Memo to Docket The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize a simple analysis describing the relationship between the primary and secondary standards proposed on January 6, 2010 ( http://www.epa.gov/air/ozonepollution/actions.html#jan10s ). The 2007-2009 ozone data were obtained from EPA’s Air Quality System (AQS). Three-year design values for the primary (8-hour) standard and the secondary (W126) standard were computed for each monitor in accordance with the data handling procedures in the proposed 40 CFR Part 50 Appendix P ( http://www.epa.gov/air/ozonepollution/fr/20100119.pdf ). The county maximum design values for each standard are displayed in the scatter plot shown below. Empirical observation of the plot reveals that the range of W126 design values associated with a given 8-hour design value level is relatively broad. For example, counties with maximum 8-hour design values of 0.065 ppm can have maximum W126 design values ranging from 3 to 9 ppm-hours. Comparison of Proposed Ozone Primary and Secondary Standards 8-hour design value (2007-2009) vs. W126 3-year average (2007-2009)8-hr Design Value (ppm)

0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.1 2

W126 3-year (ppm-hours) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 EPA Region 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 n=684 counties, color-coded by EPA Region August 16, 201 0
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of NeoPharm, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), doeshereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “10-K Report”) that:

(1)         the 10-K Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         theinformation contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: March 16, 2007 |   | /s/ GUILLERMO  A. HERRERA |   |   |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|--------|
|                       |   | Guillermo A. Herrera      |   |   |
|                       |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |   |   |

----

*       Thiscertification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of thatsection, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filingunder the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2366]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-200-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Application

January 27, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 21, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 
500 Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan, 48243 filed in Docket No. 
CP97-200-000, an application pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Natural 
Gas Act for permission and approval to abandon an transportation 
service with MAPCO Natural Gas Liquids, Inc. (MAPCO) which was 
authorized in Docket No. CP83-442-000, all as more fully set forth in 
the application on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    ANR proposes to abandon a best efforts transportation service with 
MAPCO of up to 4,500 Dekatherms per day for MAPCO. ANR states that by 
mutual agreement the parties have agreed to terminate this service 
effective with the close of business November 30, 1996. ANR further 
states that no facilities are proposed to be abandoned.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make protest with reference 
to said application should on or before February 18, 1997, file with 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20426, a 
motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 
385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.10). 
All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by it in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules.
    Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
finds that permission and approval for the proposed abandonment are 
required by the public convenience and necessity. If a motion for leave 
to intervene is timely filed, or if the Commission on its own motion 
believes that a formal hearing is required, further notice of such 
hearing will be duly given.
    Under the procedure provided for, unless otherwise advised, it will 
be unnecessary for ANR to appear or be represented at the hearing.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2366 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2068

AN ACT

To preserve existing judgeships on the Superior Court of

the District of Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2068 ES

1 SECTION 1. COMPOSITION OF SUPERIOR COURT.

2 Section 903 of title 11 of the District of Columbia

3 Code is amended by striking ‘‘fifty-eight’’ and inserting

4 ‘‘61’’.

Passed the Senate August 3, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2068

AN ACT

To preserve existing judgeships on the Superior

Court of the District of Columbia.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA solar magnetic and velocity field measurement system for Spacelab 2: The Solar Optical Universal Polarimeter (SOUP)The Solar Optical Universal Polarimeter (SOUP) flew on the shuttle mission Spacelab 2 (STS-51F) in August, 1985, and collected historic solar observations. SOUP is the only solar telescope on either a spacecraft or balloon which has delivered long sequences of diffraction-limited images. These movies led to several discoveries about the solar atmosphere which were published in the scientific journals. After Spacelab 2, reflights were planned on the shuttle Sunlab mission, which was cancelled after the Challenger disaster, and on a balloon flights, which were also cancelled for funding reasons. In the meantime, the instrument was used in a productive program of ground-based observing, which collected excellent scientific data and served as instrument tests. Given here is an overview of the history of the SOUP program, the scientific discoveries, and the instrument design and performance.Document ID19920022612Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsTarbell, Theodore D.*(Lockheed Missiles and Space Co. Palo Alto, CA, United States)*Title, Alan M.*(Lockheed Missiles and Space Co. Palo Alto, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1992Subject CategorySolar PhysicsReport/Patent NumberLMSC-PO35355LMSC-F404726NASA-CR-192448NAS 1.26:192448Accession Number92N31856Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-32805Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920022612.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2154 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2154

 To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor 
                             of Rosa Parks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 20, 2005

   Mr. Obama (for himself, Mr. Kerry, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. 
  Wyden, Ms. Mikulski, and Mr. Durbin) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor 
                             of Rosa Parks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROSA PARKS COMMEMORATIVE POSTAGE STAMP.

    (a) In General.--The Postmaster General shall issue a commemorative 
postage stamp in honor of Rosa Parks.
    (b) Denomination and Design.--The commemorative postage stamp 
issued under this Act shall--
            (1) be issued in the denomination used for 1st class mail 
        up to 1 ounce in weight; and
            (2) bear such designs as the Postmaster General shall 
        determine.
    (c) Issuance Period.--The commemorative postage stamp issued under 
this Act shall--
            (1) be placed on sale as soon as practicable after the date 
        of the enactment of this Act; and
            (2) be sold for such period thereafter as the Postmaster 
        General shall determine.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1


Certification
Pursuant To


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant To


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Epic Energy
Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, each of
the undersigned: John S. Ippolito, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company
and Michael Kinney, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of each of the undersigned’s
knowledge and belief:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      May 13, 2010
              /s/John S. IppolitoJohn
      S. Ippolito, Chief Executive Officer (Principal
                Executive
      Officer)Dated:
      May 13, 2010
              /s/ Michael KinneyMichael
      Kinney, Chief  Financial Officer
                (Principal
      Accounting Officer)
ex10-98.htm


Exhibit 10.98

 

EXTENSION OF MATURITY DATE OF WARRANTS

 

This Extension of Maturity Date of Warrants (“Extension”) is by and between the individual or entity named on the executed counterpart of the signature page hereto (such signatory is referred to as “Holder”) and OmniComm Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Maker”) and is entered into as of the day the Holder executes a copy of this Extension.

 

WHEREAS, Maker has delivered to Holder that certain 12% Promissory Note of the Maker (“Promissory Note”) dated January 31, 2015 in the aggregate to the Holder in the principal of $950,000. 

 

WHEREAS, the Maturity Date of the Promissory Note, as that term is defined in the Promissory Note, was April 01, 2017, and all principal due thereunder remains unpaid as of the date hereof.

 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the Maturity Date of the Promissory Note to January 01, 2019.

 

WHEREAS, Holder has all requisite power, authority, and capacity to enter into this Extension and to extend the Maturity Date of the Warrants.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Holder and the Maker hereby agree as follows:

 

	 	
1.
	
Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.



 

	 	
2.
	
No Other Changes. Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Promissory Note remain in full force and effect.



 

	 	
3.
	
Warrants Extension. Maker hereby agrees to extend the expiration date on the Warrants issued in connection with the $950,000 of principal from the Promissory Note on January 31, 2015, which were originally scheduled to expire on April 01, 2017. The new expiration date is January 01, 2019.



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Extension of Maturity Date of the Warrants associated with the Promissory Note is executed as of the day and date the Holder executes a copy of this Extension.

 

	
 
	
OmniComm Systems, Inc.
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Thomas E. Vickers
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Thomas E. Vickers
	
 

	 	 	Chief Financial Officer	 


 

 

[HOLDERS SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

 


 

 




 


Exhibit 10.98 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned represents that it has caused this extension of Maturity Date of Warrants to be duly executed on its behalf (if an entity, by one of its officers thereunto duly authorized) as of the date written below.

 

	
 
	
HOLDER:
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Cornelis F. Wit
	
 

	
 
	
Printed Name of Holder
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Cornelis F. Wit
	
 

	
 
	
(Signature of Holder or Authorized Person)
	
 

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Printed Name and Title if Authorized Person	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	October 15, 2015	 
	 	Date
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SUSSETTE SHEREE TIMMONS,

Appellant,

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00306

- CR

Appeal from the

380th District Court

of Collin County, Texas

(TC# 380

- 80301

- 04)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24622]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-515-000]


Western Gas Interstate Company; Notice of Proposed Changes In 
FERC Gas Tariff

September 11, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 5, 1997, Western Gas Interstate 
Company (WGI) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, Second Revised Sheet No. 239, with an 
effective date of September 25, 1997.
    WGI states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with the 
Commission's Order No. 636-C, 78 FERC para. 61,186 (1997), which 
required pipelines with a right-of-first-refusal tariff provision 
containing a contract term cap longer than five years to revise their 
tariffs consistent with the revised cap of five years adopted in Order 
No. 636-C.
    WGI states that copies of the filing were served upon its customers 
and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with 18 CFR Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must 
be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to this proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24622 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Harry Stylli, Chief Executive Officer of Sequenom, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Quarterly
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d), of the Exchange Act, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Quarterly Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set their
hands hereto as of the 31st day of October, 2008.



/s/ Harry StylliHarry StylliChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOEY M. MORALES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 175 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.