alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1856 

To provide for community disaster loans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 7 (legislative day, OCTOBER 6), 2005 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for community disaster loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Disaster 

5 Loan Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISASTER LOANS. 

7 (a) ESSENTIAL SERVICES.—Of the amounts provided 

8 in Public Law 109–62 for ‘‘Disaster Relief’’, up to 

9 $750,000,000 may be transferred to the Disaster Assist10 ance Direct Loan Program for the cost of direct loans as 

11 authorized under section 417 of the Robert T. Stafford 

12 Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 
2 

•S 1856 IS

1 5184) to be used to assist local governments in providing 

2 essential services: Provided, That such transfer may be 

3 made to subsidize gross obligations for the principal 

4 amount of direct loans not to exceed $1,000,000,000 

5 under section 417 of the Stafford Act: Provided further, 

6 That notwithstanding section 417(b) of the Stafford Act, 

7 the amount of any such loan issued pursuant to this sec8 tion may exceed $5,000,000: Provided further, That not9 withstanding section 417(c)(1) of the Stafford Act, such 

10 loans may only be canceled with the approval of OMB: 

11 Provided further, That the cost of modifying such loans 

12 shall be as defined in section 502 of the Congressional 

13 Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 661a). 

14 (b) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—Of the amounts 

15 provided in Public Law 109–62 for ‘‘Disaster Relief’’, up 

16 to $1,000,000 may be transferred to the Disaster Assist17 ance Direct Loan Program for administrative expenses to 

18 carry out the direct loan program, as authorized by section 

19 417 of the Stafford Act. 

Æ
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105·3901

OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR 

### OCT 1 

### 4 2009

The Honorable William Rhodes Gila River Indian Community P.O. Box 97 Sacaton, Arizona 85247 Dear Governor Rhodes: In December 2008, then EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson sent a letter informing you ofthe designations for the 2006 24-hournational ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for fine particles (PM2S). Yourreservation was located in an area that was designated as attainment/unclassifiable for that standard. Those designation decisions werebased on the 2005-2007 air quality monitoring data, which were the most current data at that time. However, these designations were never finalized because they were not published in the Federal Register. Current EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson has reviewed the December 2008 decisions and has decided to promulgate area designations based on consideration ofnew 2006-2008 airqualitymonitoring data, the most recent data available. I am writing to inform you that, based on consideration of2006-2008 air quality monitoring data, one additional area in Arizona, Pinal County, appears to be violating the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Because yourreservation is located both within theboundaries ofPinal County and in an adjacent county with emissions that could potentially contribute to violations in Pinal County, EPA is reviewing our initial recommendation for yourreservation. EPA is deferring the area designation for Pinal County and the surroundingring ofcounties so that EPA and the tribes may collect sufficient infonnation to assess these areas before promulgating designations. As a first step in this process, EPA will gather and evaluate information. Once an evaluation is completed, we will notify you ofourintended designation for yourreservation. We plan to announce intended designations within the next several months and at least 120 days priorto promulgating final designations. You will have an opportunity to comment on EPA's intended designation once it is announced.

Printed on Recycled PaperWe look forward to continuingto work with you and your staffto develop designations for the 24-hour PM2.sNAAQS in a timely manner. Ifyou have any questions, please do not hesitate to contactme. Your air quality staffmay wish to contact Colleen McKaughan, Associate Air Division Director at (520) 498-0118. Sincerely,

LauraYosnli Acting Regional Administrator

cc: Margaret Cook, Director, DEQ

2
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23810]

[[Page 47484]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-18-000]

Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

September 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 28, 1997, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing, as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the revised tariff sheets contained 
in Appendix A of the filing.
    The revised tariff sheets are being filed pursuant to Section 23 of 
the General Terms and Conditions of Texas Gas's FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, which affords Texas Gas the right to recover the 
costs billed to Texas Gas by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
via the FERC ACA Unit Charge method. That unit charge, as determined by 
the Commission, is $.0022/MMBtu as set forth on Texas Gas's Annual 
Charges Bill for fiscal year 1997, to be effective October 1, 1997.
    Copies of the revised tariff sheets are being mailed to Texas Gas's 
jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Secs. 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's Rules and 
Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance 
with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23810 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00330

- CV

City of Denton

v.

Brian Rushing, Calvin Patterson, and

Kevin Marshall §

§

§

§ From the 362nd District Court

of Denton County (15

- 10369

- 362)

March 23, 2017

Opinion by Justice Walker



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant City of Denton shall pay a ll of the costs

of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Sue Walker

____________________ Justice Sue Walker
Law Offices

ROLLER & BAUER, PLLC

Lee A. Bauer

Moffett B. Roller

Washington Dulles International Airport

45005 Aviation Drive; Suite 200

Dulles, VA 20166

Phone: 202-331-3300

Fax: 202-331-3322

airlaw@rollerbauer.com

July 27, 2012

Mr. Robert Finamore

Acting Chief, Foreign Carrier Licensing Division

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Result of Poll Relating to Application of Jetstar Airways Pty. Limited For

Amendment of Statement of Authorization and Renewal of Exemption

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0265

Dear Mr. Finamore:

Jetstar Airways Pty. Limited has polled the U.S. carriers on the Service List that was

attached to the Application of Jetstar Airways Pty. Limited For Amendment of Statement of

Authorization and Renewal of Exemption that was filed on July 24, 2012. None of those carriers

has any objection to DOT approval of the Application. Jetstar therefore requests prompt

approval of the Application for Amendment and Renewal so that Jetstar and American Airlines

can continue and expand their codesharing relationship.

We are serving copies of this letter by email on all parties that were served with the

Application.

Respectfully submitted,

ROLLER & BAUER, PLLC

Attorneys for Jetstar Airways Pty. Limited

By: ___________________________

Moffett B. Roller

cc: Service List
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47799-47800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24069]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-719-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Application

September 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 
500 Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan 48243, filed in Docket No. 
CP97-719-000, an application pursuant to Section 7(b) of the Natural 
Gas Act for permission and approval to abandon a natural gas storage 
and transportation service for Proliance Energy LLC (Proliance), 
formerly Central Indiana Gas Company and Indiana Gas Company, all as 
more fully set forth in the application on file with the Commission and 
open to public inspection.
    ANR asserts that by mutual agreement ANR and Proliance have agreed 
to replace the service authorized under ANR's Rate Schedule X-22 with a 
mix

[[Page 47800]]

of services provided for under ANR's FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 2. ANR states that no facilities are proposed to be 
abandoned.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make protest with reference 
to said application should on or before September 26, 1997, file with 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, a 
motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 18 
CFR 385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be considered by 
it in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve 
to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing 
to become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a party in any 
hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in accordance with the 
Commission's Rules.
    Take further notice that, pursuant to the authority contained in 
and subject to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, a hearing will be 
held without further notice before the Commission or its designee on 
this application if no motion to intervene is filed within the time 
required herein, if the Commission on its own review of the matter 
finds that permission and approval for the proposed abandonment are 
required by the public convenience and necessity. If a motion for leave 
to intervene is timely filed, or if the Commission on its own motion 
believes that a formal hearing is required, further notice of such 
hearing will be duly given.
    Under the procedure provided for, unless otherwise advised, it will 
be unnecessary for ANR to appear or be represented at the hearing.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24069 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Rice Stocks--Final Estimates (94898)**
254 La. 1102

#### L. Lee BASSHAM v. SHREVEPORT TRANSIT COMPANY, Inc., et al.

No. 50202.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 19, 1969.

In re: L. Lee Bassham applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 227 So.2d 160.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 23.1




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-96192) pertaining to the registration of 2,526,025 shares of
common stock of VideoServer, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-28209) pertaining to the registration of 223,881 shares of common stock
of VideoServer, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-85245)
pertaining to the VideoServer, Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 333-44984) pertaining to the Amended and
Restated 1991 Stock Incentive Plan and the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
of Ezenia! Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-66628)
pertaining to the registration of 400,000 shares of common stock of Ezenia!
Inc., and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-75824) pertaining to
the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, of our report dated March 25, 2003 with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Ezenia! Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2002.


                                              Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 25, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the "Form 10-Q/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc.  Date: January 21, 2011/s/ William Yan Sui HuiWilliam Yan Sui Hui, Chief Executive Officer
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 1 of 16
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 2 of 16
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 3 of 16
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 4 of 16
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 5 of 16
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 6 of 16
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 7 of 16
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 8 of 16
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 9 of 16
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 10 of 16
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 11 of 16
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 12 of 16
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 13 of 16
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 14 of 16
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 15 of 16
Case 4:04-cv-02648-JFM Document 53 Filed 10/12/06 Page 16 of 16
### The environment of South Florida; a summary report

By: B. F. McPhersonG.Y. HendrixHoward KleinH.M. Tyus

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1011

#### Links

- More information:  **Publisher Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 7, 2010 

jam 

Order 

 

June 7, 2010 

140999 

RONALD LEE JEX, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140999 

 COA: 294948 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

partial filing fee as required by the order of April 29, 2010, the Clerk of the Court is 

hereby directed to close this file.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: 8/5/14 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

– 2013
- 0602 FROM: Ray

Saracino , EPA SUBJECT: 7/15/14 , M eeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power

Plants
**SUMMARY** EPA participated in a panel discussion organized by the California Council on Environmental and Economic Balance (CCEEB) on July 15, 2014. EPA provided a brief overview of the Clean Power Plan proposal for Existing Power Plants
. **ATTENDEES** A specific list of attendees is not available. Approximately 75 people from State government, industry and environmental organizations were present. Deborah Jordan presented on behalf of EPA. Attachment
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 2 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 3 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 4 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 5 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 6 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 7 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 8 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 9 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 10 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 11 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 12 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 13 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 14 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 15 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 16 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 17 of 18
Case 4:05-cv-00671-JEJ Document 185 Filed 09/28/06 Page 18 of 18
CERTIFICATIONS Pursuant to Section 302





I, Dan Sifford, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GYK Ventures, Inc. ;





2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Dated: May 14, 2004





/s/J. Dan SiffordJ. Dan Sifford
secretary/director