alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2023068EN.01018201.xml

| 6.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 68/182 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 68/182

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/444 of 16 December 2022 supplementing Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council with measures to ensure effective access to emergency services through emergency communications to the single European emergency number ‘112’

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 65 of 2 March 2023
  )

On page 7, Article 7:

for:

‘2.   Member States shall prepare and report to the Commission no later than on 5 November 2023 a roadmap for upgrading the national PSAP system in order to be able to receive, answer and process emergency communications through packet-switched technology.’,

read:

‘2.   Member States shall prepare and report to the Commission no later than on 5 December 2023 a roadmap for upgrading the national PSAP system in order to be able to receive, answer and process emergency communications through packet-switched technology.’.

---
<PAGE>

                                                            EXHIBIT 24.3


POWER OF ATTORNEY





KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned ROBERT M. MACTARNAHAN 
hereby constitutes and appoints CHARLES A. ADAMS AND GLENMORE JAMES, or 
either of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each with 
full power of substitution and resubstitution for him and in his name, place 
and stead in any and all capacities, to sign the Form 10-KSB, Annual Report, 
of Portland Brewing Co., an Oregon corporation, for fiscal year ended 
December 31, 1996, and any amendments thereto, and to file this Power of 
Attorney and the Form 10-KSB, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents 
in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting 
unto each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do 
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done 
in and about the premises, as fully to all interests and purposes as he might 
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said 
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or 
cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Dated this 25th day of February, 1997.



Signature




/S/ ROBERT M. MACTARNAHAN, Director
-------------------------
Robert M. MacTarnahan
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46502-46503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23373]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Proposed Review Criterion for Grants for Primary Care Training 
Programs for Fiscal Year 1998

    Grants for Primary Care Training programs are authorized under 
sections 747 (a) and (b), 748, 750 and 751, title VII of the Public 
Health Service Act, as amended by the Health Professions Education 
Extension Amendments of 1992, Pub. L. 102-408, dated October 13, 1992. 
These grant programs include:

Grants for Predoctoral Training in Family Medicine
Grants for Faculty Development in Family Medicine
Grants for Graduate Training in Family Medicine
Grants for Establishment of Departments of Family Medicine
Grants for Residency Training in General Internal Medicine and General 
Pediatrics
Grants for Faculty Development in General Internal Medicine and General 
Pediatrics
Grants for Physician Assistant Training
Grants for Podiatric Primary Care Residency Training

Proposed Review Criterion

    The following criterion is proposed to be added to the existing 
review criteria established in 61 FR 52034 on October 4, 1996:
    ``5. Project impact/influence in shaping the curriculum, program, 
department, institution and the community.''

[[Page 46503]]

    The review criterion is proposed in this combined notice, rather 
than individual program announcements, to provide consistent review of 
all primary care medical education grant applications. An announcement 
will be made in the HRSA Preview for grant programs which will conduct 
competitive cycles in FY 1998.
    The comment period is 30 days. All comments received on or before 
October 3, 1997 will be considered before the final review criteria are 
established. Written comments should be addressed to: Enrique 
Fernandez, M.D., Division of Medicine, Bureau of Health Professions, 
Health Resources and Services Administration, Parklawn Building, Room 
9A-20, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone : (301) 
443-1467, FAX: (301) 443-8890.
    All comments received will be available for public inspection and 
copying at the Division of Medicine, at the above address, weekdays 
(Federal holidays excepted) between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 
p.m.

    Dated: August 28, 1997.
Claude Earl Fox,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-23373 Filed 9-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ROO Group, Inc. ("the Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Robert Petty,
President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

            (1) the Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ ROBERT PETTY
---------------------------------------------------
Robert Petty, President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 16, 2004
NOTE: This orderis nonprecedential. 

# Wniteb**~tates** 

# Q!:ourtof§Weals for tbejfeberal Q!:ircuit

EDMOND TYLER, II, Petitioner, 

### v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent.

2011-3098 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DC0752100401-I-1. 

### ONMOTION

ORDER Edmond Tyler, II submits an incomplete motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court notes that Tyler's petition was dismissed on May 3, 2011 for failure to pay the fee. Tyler failed to provide the information required by question 1 ofthe form regarding any income orbenefits received. Upon consideration thereof, ITIS ORDERED THAT:TYLER v. ARMY 2 (1) The motion is denied. (2) The mandate will be recalled, the dismissal order will be vacated, and the case will be reinstated, if Tyler pays the $450 docketing fee within 21 days ofthe date of filing ofthis order. 

## JUL 62011 Date

cc: Edmond Tyler, II Christopher A. Bowen, Esq. s20 FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 

### FILED 

## u.s. COURTOF APPEALSFOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

### JUL 062011


# . JANHORBALY ClEIIK
Exhibit  32.2
                                                                  -------------

                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                              A Nevada corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Katharine Johnston, Principal Accounting Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




         Dated: August 13, 2007               /s/  Katharine Johnston
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Its: Principal Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.













                               Exhibit 32.2 - 1
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

I, David Watson, President of Plaintree, hereby certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Plaintree Systems Inc. for the period ending on March 31, 2005.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  I, as the registrant’s sole certifying officer, am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated  subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

(c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons  performing the equivalent function):

(a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.  I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

7. There are no other certifying officers for the registrant.

 

Date: September 29, 2005.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Niku Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended October 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joshua Pickus, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. that information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Niku Corporation for the period covered by the Report.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|Dated: December 6, 2004 |  |  |  | /S/    JOSHUA
PICKUS   
|                        |  |  |  | Joshua Pickus          
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


1.  Dave & Buster's of Illinois, Inc., an Illinois corporation
2.  Dave & Buster's of Georgia, Inc., a Georgia corporation
3.  Dave & Buster's of Pennsylvania, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation
4.  Dave & Buster's of Maryland, Inc., a Maryland corporation
5.  Dave & Buster's of California, Inc., a California corporation
6.  Dave & Buster's of Colorado, Inc., a Colorado corporation
7.  Dave & Buster's of New York, Inc., a New York corporation
8.  Dave & Buster's of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation
9.  Dave & Buster's of Pittsburgh, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation
10. Dave & Buster's of Hawaii, Inc., a Hawaii corporation
11. Dave & Buster's I, L.P., a Texas limited partnership
12. D&B Realty Holding, Inc., a Missouri corporation
13. D&B Leasing, Inc., a Texas corporation
14. DANB Texas, Inc., a Texas corporation
# L_2006104EN.01003601.xml

| 13.4.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 104/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 104/36

---

DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

of 6 April 2006

appointing an Advocate-General to the Court of Justice of the European Communities

(2006/278/EC, Euratom)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 223 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 139 thereof,

Whereas:

Pursuant to Articles 5, 7 and 8 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice and as a result of the resignation of Mr Antonio TIZZANO, an Advocate-General should be appointed for the remainder of his term of office, which ends on 6 October 2006,

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Paolo MENGOZZI is hereby appointed Advocate-General to the Court of Justice of the European Communities from the date of his swearing in until 6 October 2006.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 6 April 2006.

The President

G. WOSCHNAGG

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Report to Congress on the implementation of the Deep SeaCoral Research and Technology Program.**
 
2008 | 2008-2009
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.357:
Item Number:0609-C-22 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001066497
 
August 8, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                          939
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                939
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           500
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        1,600
<OTHER-SE>                      (161)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,939
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    0
<EPS-BASIC>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0



</TABLE>
#### LITHO ARTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. MACKE BINDERY, INCORPORATED, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-291.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Jan. 13, 1970.

Shutts & Bowen, and Thomas H. Anderson, Miami, for appellant.

Joseph A. Ferrara, and Edward D. Cow-art, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Pyms v. Meranda, Fla.1957, 98 So.2d 341; Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669; Grant v. Williams, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 23; Miles v. Ware, Fla.App.1967, 204 So.2d 524.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,263,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               30,847,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 21,829,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            61,066,000
<PP&E>                                     198,137,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             107,167,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             263,114,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       37,717,000
<BONDS>                                    203,479,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,326,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               263,114,000
<SALES>                                    142,633,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           142,633,000
<CGS>                                      116,253,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,061,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               123,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,280,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,084,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (3,025,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,059,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,059,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6350

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICHARD LYNN WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:01-cr-00012-RLV-1; 5:12-cv-00132-

RLV)

Submitted: July 29, 2014 Decided: July 31, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Lynn Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Jack M. Knight, Jr., 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Lynn Williams seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

(2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Charles BURKINS, Jr. v. Honorable Matthew S. BRANIFF, Judge, Orleans Parish Prison.

No. 61400.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: Charles Burkins, Jr. applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Denied. Trial Court ruled on this matter June 5. See # 61,645.
#### Evelyn KAZDAN, Appellant, v. Lester A. RUSSIN, M.D., Michael Russin, M.D., Mt. Sinai Hospital of Greater Miami, Inc., Travelers Insurance Company, Dr. Hyun Oh and Imperial Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 76-1521.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 17, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 13, 1978.

Freidin & Goldfarb, Miami, for appellant.

Adams, George, Lee, Schulte & Ward and Amy Shield Levine, Milton Kelner, Miami, for appellees.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: *Roth v. Dade County,*71 So.2d 169 (Fla.1954); *Carter v. Florida Power and Light Co.,*138 Fla. 220, 189 So. 705 (1939); *McDonald v. Moore,*323 So.2d 635 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); *Parmerter v. Osteopathic General Hospital,*196 So.2d 505 at 507 (Fla.3d DCA 1967).