alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material                respects the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|

|   |                                                                                  |                                  |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                  |                                  |
|   |                                                                             | /s/                          Erna Gao |
|   |                                                                                       |
|   | Erna GaoChief Financial OfficerDate: August 18,                            2006  |

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Harry Stylli, Chief Executive Officer of Sequenom, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Quarterly Report)
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d), of the Exchange Act, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Quarterly Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has set their hands hereto as of the 11th day of May, 2009.



/s/ HARRY STYLLIHarry StylliChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF (2002
 
 CERTIFICATION OF SOLE REMAINING OFFICER-DIRECTOR
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of GYK Ventures, Inc. , a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-QSB for the September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dan Sifford, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
     Dated:
  /s/J. Dan Sifford
 J. Dan Sifford
 sole officer/director
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
 
  As independent chartered accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report dated July 31, 1998 (except with respect to the matters
discussed in Note 22, as to which the date is September 11, 1998) as to which
the date of Consent is September 24, 1998, included in this Form 10-K, into
Discreet Logic Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8,
File No. 39-97400 and on Form S-3, File No. 333-34739.
 
                                       /S/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CIE
                                       Chartered Accountants
                                       General Partnership
Montreal, Canada
September 24, 1998
### Geology and water resources of the Mud Lake region, Idaho, including the Island Park area

By: Harold T. StearnsL. L. BryanLynn Crandall

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp818

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OMAR SHARRIEFF GAY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

MATTHEW CATE, et al., 

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-16144

D.C. No. 3:10-cv-01314-WHA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2011** 

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Omar Sharrieff Gay appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants

violated Gay’s Eighth Amendment, due process and equal protection rights. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

FILED

JUL 22 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-16144

dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim, Weilburg v.

Shapiro, 488 F.3d 1202, 1205 (9th Cir. 2007), and for an abuse of discretion the

district court’s dismissal of a complaint without leave to amend, Lopez v. Smith,

203 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). We vacate and remand. 

The district court dismissed Gay’s original complaint without first providing

him with notice of the deficiencies and an opportunity to amend with the benefit of

that notice, and also did not address Gay’s equal protection claim that he is

“similarly situated” to mentally ill prisoners who urinate or soil on themselves and

his claim for failure to protect him from his cellmates. Accordingly, we vacate the

judgment and remand to the district court with instructions to address the equal

protection and failure-to-protect claims and provide Gay with an opportunity to file

an amended complaint. See Weilburg, 488 F.3d at 1205 (“Dismissal of a pro se

complaint without leave to amend is proper only if it is absolutely clear that the

deficiencies of the complaint could not be cured by amendment.” (citation and

internal quotation marks omitted)); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1261 (9th

Cir. 1992) (“[B]efore dismissing a pro se complaint the district court must provide

the litigant with notice of the deficiencies in his complaint in order to ensure that

the litigant uses the opportunity to amend effectively.”).
3 10-16144

Gay shall bear his own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsResults of aeroheating DFI and ET design-data test on a 0.0175-scale model 60-OTS conducted in the Von Karman Gas Dynamics Facility (VKF) 40" supersonic and the 50" hypersonic wind tunnels A and CThe 0.0175-scale thin-skin thermocouple Model 60-OTS was tested in the von Karman Gas Facility 40-inch continuous flow supersonic tunnel A and the VKF Tunnel C. Testing was conducted at Mach numbers 2.25 to 4.0, and Reynolds numbers from 0.4 x 10 to the 6th power/ft to 6.6 x 10 to the 6th power/ft. Angle of attack range was from -5.0 to +5.0 degrees, and angle of sideslip range was from -6 to +6 degrees. The primary objective of this test was to provide a valid base for the external tank (ET) and solid rocket booster (SRB) heating prediction methodology for ascent flight by taking heating data at Development Flight Instrumentation (DFI) locations for flight conditions simulating STS-1 through -4. A second objective was to obtain additional aeroheating data to support potential reduction of the thermal protection system (TPS) on the ET. The third phase of the test was funded and conducted by NASA/MSFC for the purpose of establishing confidence in the data base from the lower temperature tunnel A.Document ID19850014155Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsMarroquin, J.*(Rockwell International Corp. Downey, Calif., United States)*Leef, C. R.*(Rockwell International Corp. Downey, Calif., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1985Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberDMS-DR-2520NAS 1.26:167693NASA-CR-167693Accession Number85N22466Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-17179Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850014155.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, John D. Doherty, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Central Bancorp, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.November 14, 2007      /s/ John D. Doherty   John D. Doherty
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Wilda FOUCHA.

No. 60707.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 15, 1978.

Lyall G. Shiell, Jr., New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Brian G. Meissner, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Mark McKinnon

Dentons US LLP

1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102-4832

United States

email: mark.mckinnon@dentons.com

T 703.336.8808

F 703.336.8750

Salans FMC SNR 

Denton

McKenna Long

dentons.com

September 8, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11278 granted to Perfect View Aerial Media (Docket 

No. FAA–2014–0845)

To Whom it May Concern:

As you are aware, this office represents Perfect View Aerial Media (Perfect View) 

regarding the above-referenced Petition for Exemption, which was granted on April 1, 2015. 

Perfect View hereby requests an amendment to its Exemption to add three additional aircraft, the 

DJI Inspire, DJI S900, and Roboflight RF70.

 

I. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED OPERATIONS

Perfect View seeks to amend its Exemption to add the aircraft listed above for use in 

support of Perfect View's aerial photography, infrastructure inspection, and aerial data gathering 

activities. 

II. PERFECT VIEW'S PROPOSED UAS OPERATIONS MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 

SECTION 333 OF THE REFORM ACT

A. Approval is Warranted Based on the UAS's Size, Weight, Speed, and 

Operational Capability 

The FAA has already ruled that the listed aircraft meet all of the criteria set forth in 

Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. Accordingly, all of the 

requirements to operate these vehicles been satisfied and the petition is suitable for a summary 

grant. 

DJI Inspire: See, Exemption No. 11254 to Upward Aerial; Exemption No. 11659 to 

Fovea Aero Systems; Exemption No. 11668 to Sky-Forge Robotics LLC. 

DJI S900: See, Exemption No. 12640 to Revolution UAS, LLC, Docket No. FAA-2015-

2422; Exemption No. 12636 to AirGo Media, LLC, Docket no. FAA-2015-

2425.
September 8, 2015

Page 2

Salans FMC SNR Denton

McKenna Long

dentons.com

Roboflight RF70: See, Exemption No. 12630 to RC Aztec Enterprise Inc., Docket No. 

FAA–2015–1391; Exemption No. 12445 to Air Data Solutions, FAA Docket 

No. FAA–2015–1025.

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption seeking the addition of a 

supplementary UAS model that is substantially similar to the one currently authorized for use 

under the Exemption, Perfect View respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice 

does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

III. The Requested Amendment is in the Public Interest

The above listed UAS offer substantial safety benefits for aerial data collection over 

conventional operations using helicopters or fixed wing aircraft. 

If you have any questions regarding this amendment, or require any additional 

information to process Perfect View's Petition, please do not hesitate to contact us. 

Very Truly Yours, 

Mark E. McKinnon

Counsel for Perfect View Aerial Media
#### W. Lawrence OLIVER and Hazel P. Oliver, Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee.

No. 76-1892.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted March 16, 1977.

Decided April 12, 1977.

*561W. Lawrence Oliver, Des Moines, Iowa, for appellant.

Carolyn R. Just, Atty., Tax Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before GIBSON, Chief Judge, and WEBSTER and HENLEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

W. Lawrence Oliver and Hazel P. Oliver appeal a judgment of the Tax Court sustaining the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s assessments of deficiencies in their income taxes for 1970 and 1971. The Tax Court approved the Commissioner’s disallowance of a variety of deductions sought by taxpayers and the determination that Lawrence Oliver had understated his gross income in 1971. After hearing oral argument and carefully reviewing the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we are convinced that the Tax Court gave full consideration to the taxpayers’ contentions and allowed them all deductions which were properly substantiated. Moreover, because the burden of proof was upon the taxpayers, their failure to offer any evidence to contradict the Commissioner’s presumptively correct determination of an understatement of income in 1971 virtually compelled the Tax Court’s approval of this determination. *Welch v.*Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 54 S.Ct. 8, 78 L.Ed. 212 (1933); Tax Court Rule of Practice and Procedure 142(a). Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of the Tax Court’s well reasoned opinion.

Affirmed.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEFFREY D. HILL, :

: Case No. 4:05-CV-1229

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

EVELYN DERRICK, :

RICHARD SUTTON, : (Judge McClure)

JANE STUGART-OTTERBEIN, :

AND LORI CRESSMAN, :

:

Defendants. :

O R D E R

March 10, 2006

BACKGROUND:

On June 20, 2005, plaintiff Jeffrey D. Hill commenced the instant litigation

by filing a pro se complaint in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The complaint

arises out of plaintiff’s banishment from the Muncy Public Library. On November

3, 2005, we granted defendants’ motion to dismiss in part, but allowed plaintiff’s

section 1983 claims, liberally construed as alleging violations of the First and

Fourteenth Amendments, to remain against defendants Derrick and Cressman. 

(Rec. Doc. No. 20.)

On February 27, 2006, Hill filed a motion to compel discovery and a brief in

Case 4:05-cv-01229-JFM Document 53 Filed 03/10/06 Page 1 of 2
2

support of his motion. (Rec. Doc. No. 49.) On March 8, 2006, defendants filed a

brief in opposition that indicated Hill had failed to contact opposing counsel and

make a good faith effort to resolve the discovery issue as contemplated by L.R.

26.3. Defendants also indicated that they have since provided Hill with the

discovery he sought in the form of a supplemental answer. Therefore, Hill’s

motion for discovery is moot.

In his motion, Hill requests in the alternative that we levy sanctions. Hill

failed to make a good faith effort with opposing counsel for the information he

sought. Sanctions are not warranted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Hill’s motion to compel discovery filed on February 27, 2006, is

denied as moot. (Rec. Doc. No. 49.)

2. Hill’s request in the alternative for sanctions is denied.

s/James F. McClure, Jr.

 James F. McClure, Jr. 

United States District Judge

Case 4:05-cv-01229-JFM Document 53 Filed 03/10/06 Page 2 of 2
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 2094

AN ACT

To reauthorize certain provisions relating to Indian tribal

justice systems.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2094 ES

1 SECTION 1. INDIAN TRIBAL JUSTICE.

2 (a) INDIAN TRIBAL JUSTICE TECHNICAL AND LEGAL

3 ASSISTANCE.—The Indian Tribal Justice Technical and

4 Legal Assistance Act of 2000 is amended—

5 (1) in section 106 (25 U.S.C. 3666), by striking

6 ‘‘for fiscal years 2000 through 2004’’ and inserting

7 ‘‘for fiscal years 2004 through 2010’’; and

8 (2) in section 201(d) (25 U.S.C. 3681(d)), by

9 striking ‘‘for fiscal years 2000 through 2004’’ and

10 inserting ‘‘for fiscal years 2004 through 2010’’.

Passed the Senate December 13, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 2094

AN ACT

To reauthorize certain provisions relating to Indian

tribal justice systems.