alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Full transparency, trust are key goals of DLA’s 10th Cost Summit 

/ Published June 7, 2018

Operations and finance officials from the Defense Logistics Agency renewed their goal of transparency on all things cost related with the 10th Cost Summit at the McNamara Headquarters Complex June 4.

The meeting, held twice a year to update military customers on financial issues affecting the agency and service customers, was co-chaired by DLA Finance Director Gretchen Anderson and Mike Scott, deputy director of DLA Logistics Operations. Attendees included guests from the Office of the Secretary of Defense, each branch of the military services and DLA major subordinate commands.

“I remember 10 Cost Summits ago when we first came up with the idea of bringing folks together,” Scott said. “At that time there was a fair amount of cross service/DLA dialog on the cost topic. Lately, from where I sit, it’s getting back to that kind of fevor pitch, so I would encourage everybody, whatever is on your mind, share it.” 

Anderson welcomed guests and introduced them to the new DLA Cost Transparency brochure, which lists information such as sales breakouts, cost recovery rates and comparisons and DoD fuel facts. We’re all about disclosing costs and transparency here, she said.

DLA Finance’s Kevin Abney provided an update on the Program Budget Review 2020, noting that the agency expects to continue reducing its long-term cost-recovery rates, the margin DLA charges customers to cover its operating costs. Fiscal 2018 sales for the agency’s eight materiel supply chains are projected at $25.2 billion, $1.7 billion more than planned. DLA Distribution’s processing workload has also increased. And DLA Energy pricing remains a concern, despite a new DoD-directed standard price, since the market costs DLA pays for fuel continue to increase. 

Service representatives followed up with an outline of the impacts the increased DoD budget may have on maintenance and operations, and DLA Disposition Services described the return on investment of property the MSC has processed this fiscal year through April. 

Patrick Cihak from DLA Logistics Operations introduced attendees to the DLA Enterprise Dashboard, which provides a near-real-time view of readiness rates for platforms and weapons systems operated by the services. The Dashboard, a compilation of metrics from DLA systems and the services’ common operating pictures, is expected to help officials improve readiness through close scrutiny of supply metrics like materiel availability and backorder status. 

DLA officials also announced the creation of DLA Logistics Operations’ new Service Readiness Demand Planning Summit, which is expected to improve DLA planning by giving the services a chance to provide input on influences such as changes in operational tempo and maintenance schedules. The first summit will take place July 12-13 at the McNamara Headquarters Complex Commanders’ Conference Room. 

Other topics included market basket review, audit readiness and material obligation validation.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2119 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2119

To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant 
         program through June 30, 2006, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 16, 2005

  Mr. Baucus introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families block grant 
         program through June 30, 2006, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TANF and Related Programs Extension 
Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES 
              (TANF), TRANSITIONAL MEDICAL ASSISTANCE (TMA), AND 
              ABSTINENCE PROGRAMS THROUGH JUNE 30, 2006.

    (a) In General.--Activities authorized by part A of title IV of the 
Social Security Act, and by sections 510, 1108(b), and 1925 of such 
Act, shall continue through June 30, 2006, in the manner authorized for 
fiscal year 2005, notwithstanding section 1902(e)(1)(A) of such Act, 
and out of any money in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise 
appropriated, there are hereby appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary for such purpose. Grants and payments may be made pursuant to 
this authority on a quarterly basis through the third quarter of fiscal 
year 2006 at the level provided for such activities for each 
corresponding quarter of fiscal year 2005.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 403(a)(3)(H)(ii) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(3)(H)(ii)) is amended by striking 
``December 31, 2005'' and inserting ``June 30, 2006''.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL RANDOM SAMPLE STUDY OF CHILD WELFARE 
              AND CHILD WELFARE WAIVER AUTHORITY THROUGH JUNE 30, 2006.

    Activities authorized by sections 429A and 1130(a) of the Social 
Security Act shall continue through June 30, 2006, in the manner 
authorized for fiscal year 2005, and out of any money in the Treasury 
of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary for such purpose. Grants and 
payments may be made pursuant to this authority on a quarterly basis 
through the third quarter of fiscal year 2006 at the level provided for 
such activities for each corresponding quarter of fiscal year 2005.
                                 <all>
```
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: Asset  management plan
SuDocs Number: VA 1.1/13:
Item    Number:0983-A-17    (online)
GPO    System Number: 000775568
 
2007
 
2008
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

Last updated:  October 12,  2000  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
perm |
|--|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (subsection (a) and
(b)  of  Section  1350,  Chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned officer of The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. (the "Company")  certifies
to his knowledge that:

     (1)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
          September  6,  2003  (the  "Form  10-Q")  fully   complies   with  the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (the "Act"); and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial conditions and results of operations
          of the Company as for the dates and for the periods referred to in the
          Form 10-Q.


                                                   /s/ Alfred H. Drewes
                                                       ----------------
                                                       Alfred H. Drewes
                                                       Senior Vice President and
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                                       October 17, 2003

The foregoing  certification  (the  "Certification")  is being furnished  solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).

A signed original of the Certification has been provided to the Company and will
be retained  by the Company in  accordance  with Rule  12b-11(d)  of the Act and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24529]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board Task Force on Nuclear Deterrence; Meeting

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board Task Force on Nuclear Deterrence 
will meet in closed session on September 29, at Headquarters, STRATCOM, 
Offutt AFB, Nebraska; on October 15-17, at Los Alamos National 
Laboratory, Albuquerque, New Mexico; and on November 18-19, 1997, at 
SAIC, 4001 N. Fairfax Drive, Arlington, Virginia.
    The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary 
of Defense through the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology on scientific and technical matters as they affect the 
perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings the 
Task Force will address the U.S. ability to deter and prevent the 
effective use of weapons of mass destruction against U.S. territory, 
forces, and allies.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II, (1994)), it has 
been determined that these DSB Task Force meetings concern matters 
listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) (1994), and that accordingly these 
meetings will be closed to the public.

    Dated: September 11, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-24529 Filed 9-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
# L_2023134EN.01002701.xml

| 22.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 134/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 134/27

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/979

of 15 May 2023

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Nueces de Nerpio’ (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Nueces de Nerpio’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Nueces de Nerpio’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Nueces de Nerpio’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Nueces de Nerpio’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Nueces de Nerpio’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 May 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 41, 3.2.2023, p. 28.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2200

JACQUELINE R. CARROLL-HALL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

THE ARC OF BALTIMORE; RON CHRISTIAN; DELE SANGODEYI; 

MONIQUE DUBOIS; SHAREEN JONES; KEVIN PUSHIA; CHRYSTIE 

NICHOLSON; KIM MEEKINS; RYAN REIF; OLU FATODU; ALAN 

CAMPBELL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:10-cv-00873-RDB)

Submitted: April 29, 2011 Decided: May 18, 2011

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jacqueline R. Carroll-Hall, Appellant Pro Se. David Lee 

Jacobson, BLADES & ROSENFELD, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jacqueline R. Carroll-Hall appeals the district 

court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss her

complaint alleging claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights 

Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 

2003 & Supp. 2010), and under the Age Discrimination in 

Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634 

(West 2008 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Carroll-Hall v. The Arc of 

Baltimore, No. 1:10-cv-00873-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 22, 2010). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23890]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2223]

Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification of Action in 
Rulemaking Proceedings

September 4, 1997.
    Petitions for reconsideration and clarification have been filed in 
the Commission's rulemaking proceedings listed in this Public Notice 
and published pursuant to 47 CFR Section 1.429(e). The full text of 
these documents are available for viewing and copying in Room 239, 1919 
M Street, NW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's 
copy contractor, ITS, Inc. (202) 857-3800. Oppositions to these 
petitions must be filed September 25, 1997. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of 
the Commission's rule (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must 
be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has 
expired.
    Subject: Review of Sections 68.104 and 68.213 of the Commission's 
Rules Concerning Connection of Simple Inside Wiring to the Telephone 
Network and Petition for Modification of Section 68.213 of the 
Commission's Rules filed by the Electronic Industries Association. (CC 
Docket No. 88-57, RM-5643)
    Number of Petitions Filed: 2.
    Subject: Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: 
Reform of Filing Requirements and Carrier Classifications. (CC Docket 
No. 96-193)
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23890 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
```
Exhibit 99.2



EXTENSION OF MODIFICATION TO MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTING AND
TECHNOLOGY LICENSE AGREEMENT

This Extension of Modification To
Manufacturing, Distributing And Technology License Agreement (Extension) extends the Modification to Manufacturing,
Distributing and Technology License Agreement entered into effective May 31, 2002 (the Modification) made between
Image Sensing Systems, Inc. and Econolite Control Products, Inc.

Whereas, Econolite and ISS executed the
Modification effective June, 2002 to be effective for two years.

Whereas, Econolite has requested ISS to
consider extending the Modification.

Whereas, ISS wishes to improve its business
success in Latin America,

Whereas, Econolite has a Spanish speaking
international sales manager supporting Econolites distributors in Latin America, and

Whereas, ISS is willing to evaluate the
potential of ISS business growth in Latin America through Econolite.

Now therefore, the parties agree to extend
the Modification with respect to the Supplemental Territory of Latin America on an exclusive basis for a period of two years, at
the end of which, the two parties shall review the Modification for further extension as appropriate.

In witness whereof, the parties have executed
this Extension to become effective as of the 1st day of July, 2004





By:
        /s/ James Murdakes
        
        By:
        /s/ David J.St.AmantJames Murdakes
President and CEO
Image Sensing Systems, Inc.
        
        
        David J.St.Amant
COO
EconoliteControl Products, Inc.








---
Exhibit
        99.1
  
 
 July
        31,
        2007
 
 John
        P.
        Nolan
 Securities
        and Exchange Commission
 Division
        of Corporate Finance-Chief Accountants Office
 100
        F
        Street NE Mailstop 4561
 Washington,
        D.C. 20549
 
 
 Dear
        Mr.
        Nolan:
 
 
 We
        agree
        with the comments related to your review of our Form 10-K for Oak Hill
        Financial, Inc.  (“the Company”) for the fiscal year ended December
        31, 2006 as filed on March 16, 2007 and more specifically, Item
        9A.  Our filing will be amended to include clarity and additional
        disclosure related to the principal executive and financial officer’s
        conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure and controls
        procedures.
 
 We
        will
        include the entire text of the amended Item 9A as well as updated consents
        from
        our officers.  In addition to answering the above comment and filing
        an amended form 10-K we acknowledge the following to be true:
 
 —  the
        Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in
        our
        filing;
 —  staff
        comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose
        the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing;
        and
 —  the
        Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated
        by the Commission or any other person under the federal securities laws of
        the
        United States.
 
 If
        you
        have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at
        740-286-3283.
 
 
 Sincerely,
 
 */s/
        Dale B. Shafer*
 
 Dale
        B.
        Shafer
 CFO-Oak
        Hill Financial, Inc.
#### John W. CHENEVERT v. Louisiana STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS.

No. 60073.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 2, 1977.

In re John W. Chenevert applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson, 345 So.2d 960.

Writ denied. No error of law.
### Simplified methods for computing total sediment discharge with the modified Einstein procedure

By: Bruce R. ColbyDavid Wellington Hubbell

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1593

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (3161 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (2582 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (1606 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 4**                            (355 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 5**                            (1808 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 6**                            (1599 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 7**                            (4402 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 8**                            (4532 pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Simplified methods for computing total sediment discharge with the modified Einstein procedure(1957)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Case 4:05-cv-02181-JEJ Document 19 Filed 02/15/06 Page 1 of 7
Case 4:05-cv-02181-JEJ Document 19 Filed 02/15/06 Page 2 of 7
Case 4:05-cv-02181-JEJ Document 19 Filed 02/15/06 Page 3 of 7
Case 4:05-cv-02181-JEJ Document 19 Filed 02/15/06 Page 4 of 7
Case 4:05-cv-02181-JEJ Document 19 Filed 02/15/06 Page 5 of 7
Case 4:05-cv-02181-JEJ Document 19 Filed 02/15/06 Page 6 of 7
Case 4:05-cv-02181-JEJ Document 19 Filed 02/15/06 Page 7 of 7