alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### AMERICAN PARTITION COMPANY et al. v. Eloise THORNTON.

No. 45612.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 2, 1970.

Satterfield, Shell, Williams & Buford, Kenneth G. Perry, Jackson, for appellants.

Jerry T. Johnston, Brandon, for appellee.

BRADY, Justice:

This is an appeal of a workmen’s compensation case from the Circuit Court of Rankin County, Mississippi, wherein the court reversed the holding of the full Workmen’s Compensation Commission and reinstated the order of the attorney referee, requiring the appellant to pay all medical bills including the expenses of two additional doctors selected by the appellee, upon authorization by the appellant. From this decision an appeal was taken.

Under Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated section 6998-08 (1952) and the subdivisions thereof, the appellant in this cause had the right to designate the physician and medical, surgical or other treatment necessary for the medical treatment of the employee. This the appellant did when the appellee first reported her injury by selecting Dr. Edgar Bobo, who in turn referred the appellee to Dr. George Purvis. This same statutory authorization permitted the appellant, through its superintendent, to designate other physicians or surgeons together with additional medical and surgical treatment. The testimony of the appel-lee is uncontradicted that the appellant’s superintendent and superior official of the appellee, Mr. Fred Ayres, was told by the appellee that she was going to another doctor; that she “felt that- Dr. Bobo wasn’t doing anything for me and I was feeling just as much pain as I ever was or maybe more.” Appellee then stated that Mr. Ayres told her to “go to whoever I had to, or do whatever I had to to get better.”

This is uncontradicted and is an express authorization on the part of the appellee *191employer for the appellant to select a doctor of her choice. She chose Dr. Richard E. Schuster, her family physician, who referred her to Dr. B. G. Spell, an orthopedic surgeon, who removed a ruptured disc from appellee’s back. The statutory limitation of $100 expense to be borne by the employer where the employee selects his own physician or surgeon of section 6998-08(e) together with Rule 9 of the Mississippi Workmen’s Compensation Commission does not apply under the facts of this case.

The judgment of the circuit court affirming the attorney referee is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

ETHRIDGE, C. J., and RODGERS, JONES and INZER, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe relative effect of noise at different times of day: An analysis of existing survey dataThis report examines survey evidence on the relative impact of noise at different times of day and assesses the survey methodology which produces that evidence. Analyses of the regression of overall (24-hour) annoyance on noise levels in different time periods can provide direct estimates of the value of the parameters in human reaction models which are used in environmental noise indices such as LDN and CNEL. In this report these analyses are based on the original computer tapes containing the responses of 22,000 respondents from ten studies of response to noise in residential areas. The estimates derived from these analyses are found to be so inaccurate that they do not provide useful information for policy or scientific purposes. The possibility that the type of questionnaire item could be biasing the estimates of the time-of-day weightings is considered but not supported by the data. Two alternatives to the conventional noise reaction model (adjusted energy model) are considered but not supported by the data.Document ID19860014921Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsFields, J. M.*(Bionetics Corp. Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1986Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:3965NASA-CR-3965Accession Number86N24392Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: DTFA01-834-10564CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-16978PROJECT: RTOP 505-35-13-53Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860014921.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-1621 

LT Case No. 2017-MM-048404-A 

_____________________________ 

MATTHEW DAVID MCGEE, 

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

3.850 Appeal from the County Court for Brevard County. 

Kathryn C. Jacobus, Judge. 

Matthew David McGee, Satellite Beach, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

October 31, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

SOUD, BOATWRIGHT, and PRATT, JJ., concur. 
2 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6008

CRAIG ARRON HOOPER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District

Judge. (CA-01-379-3)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 29, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Craig Arron Hooper, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Craig Arron Hooper seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994

& Supp. 2001) and denying his fourth motion for an extension of

time in which to file a response to the State’s motion to dismiss.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See Hooper v. Angelone, No. CA-01-379-3 (E.D. Va.

Nov. 28, 2001). We deny Hooper’s motion for transcripts at

Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
DSpace Repository

# Reconstruction of Demographic Profiles from Ossuary Skeletal Samples: A Case Study from the Tidewater Potomac

Login

      -  DSpace Home 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions Series 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology 
      - →
      - View Item

# Reconstruction of Demographic Profiles from Ossuary Skeletal Samples: A Case Study from the Tidewater Potomac

Ubelaker, Douglas H.

DOI:					https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.18.1

Date:					1974

### Abstract:					

### Citation:					

*Reconstruction of Demographic Profiles from Ossuary Skeletal Samples: A Case Study from the Tidewater Potomac**Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology*https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.18.1

Show full item record

## Files in this item

Name:SCtA-0018-Hi_res.pdf

Size:35.10Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0018-Lo_res.pdf

Size:5.734Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0018.epub

Size:23.94Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:ePub

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0018.mobi

Size:31.11Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:mobi

View/Open

## This item appears in the following Collection(s)

            -  Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology  [60]  

# Search DSpace

# Browse

              -  All of DSpace                  -  Communities & Collections 
                -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 
              -  This Collection                  -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 

# My Account

              -  Login 

Terms of UsePrivacyContact UsSend Feedback

DSpace softwareDuraSpace

Theme by
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1649 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1649

   To require the Secretary of Energy to submit to Congress a report 
 describing the method by which existing reporting systems within the 
Department of Energy can be coordinated to provide timely reporting of 
 significant supply interruptions in the transmission of petroleum and 
                      petroleum-related products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2005

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Energy to submit to Congress a report 
 describing the method by which existing reporting systems within the 
Department of Energy can be coordinated to provide timely reporting of 
 significant supply interruptions in the transmission of petroleum and 
                      petroleum-related products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORT ON CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR SIGNIFICANT INTERRUPTIONS IN 
              ENERGY TRANSMISSION.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall submit to Congress a report 
describing existing plans and procedures of the Department of Energy 
relating to a significant interruption, as determined by the Secretary, 
in the transmission of petroleum or a petroleum-related product.
    (b) Inclusions.--The report under subsection (a) shall include--
            (1) a description of the method by which the Secretary 
        shall notify the Governor and any Federal elected official of a 
        State affected by a significant interruption in the 
        transmission of petroleum or a petroleum-related product; and
            (2) recommendations with respect to any legislative action 
        relating to the implementation or efficiency of a contingency 
        plan of the Department of Energy.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1676 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1676

             To reduce temporarily the duty on O-Toluidine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2005

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To reduce temporarily the duty on O-Toluidine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF DUTY ON O-TOLUIDINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.39.14      2-Methylaniline     1.8%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 95-53-4)                                                  31/2009
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2921.43.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

A.R., : No. 3:15cv1780

Plaintiff :

: (Judge Munley)

v. :

:

JEFFREY NORRIS, JAMES :

TALLERICO, and MONTROSE AREA :

SCHOOL DISTRICT, :

Defendants :

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

 ORDER 

AND NOW, to wit, this 10th day of November 2015, plaintiff’s motion

to remand under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) alleging a procedural defect in the

notice of removal (Doc. 9) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to

REMAND this case, including Defendant Montrose Area School District’s

motion to dismiss (Doc. 5), to the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna

County, Pennsylvania.

 

BY THE COURT:

s/ James M. Munley 

JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY

United States District Court

Case 3:15-cv-01780-JMM Document 30 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 1
256 La. 257

#### COLLINS PIPELINE COMPANY v. NEW ORLEANS EAST, INC.

No. 50619.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: New Orleans East, Inc. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition or mandamus.

The application is denied. There appears no error of law in the ruling complained of.

SUMMERS, J.,

is of the opinion the writ, should be granted. See Art. 2628, 2629 & 2634 La. Civil Code; La.Const. Art. I, Sec. 2; Art. IV, Sec. 15.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-26-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-26-1997
<CASH>                                      11,837,265
<SECURITIES>                                20,930,326
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,933,708
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,048,285
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,484,236
<PP&E>                                      17,411,913
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,372,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,831,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,396,043
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,363
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,371,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                62,831,534
<SALES>                                     81,242,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            81,242,707
<CGS>                                       45,296,096
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               45,296,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,954
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (160,192)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,870,088
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,241,987
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,628,101
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,628,101
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.45
        

</TABLE>
Helping People Help the Land

Conservation Activity Plan

Integrated Pest Management, Herbicide 

Resistance Weeds 

December 2011

Integrated Pest 

Management, Herbicide 

Resistance Weeds

An integrated pest management, 

herbicide resistance weeds 

conservation activity plan is a 

	



strategy to help a landowner 

suppress herbicide resistant weeds 

on cropland while protecting soil, 

water, air, and plant quality.

NRCS Technical Service Providers 

(TSPs) prepare these plans using 

inputs such as: 

  

 assessments

  

  

Conservation practices 

recommended in these plans can 

include:

  

  

  !

  

  "#

  $!

For more information, please visit 

www.nrcs.usda.gov and search for 

“Technical Service Providers.”

www.nrcs.usda.gov

USDA is an equal opportunity 

provider and employer.
Paxton Springs

6

1

1

1 1

1

1

1

6

1

1 6

6

1

6

1

6

6

1 6

1

6

6 1

6 6

6

6 1

1 6

1

1 6

1

6 6

6

1 6

31

31

36

36 3136

36

31

36

31

36

36

31

36

36

31 36 36

36 36

31

31

36

36

31

31

31

31

31

36

36

36 31

36

31 31

31

36

31

31

El Malpais Wilderness Study Area

0 2 4 6 8

Miles

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the 

accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual use 

or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by BLM. 

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. 

This information may be updated without notification.

Rio Puerco

Field Office

New Mexico

T5n

R10w R9w

T8n

West Malpais Wilderness

Location of WSA

Canyons

WSA

Chain of Craters WSA

 ̄

El Malpais WSA

El Malpais National Monument

R13w

T9n

El Malpais WSA

El Malpais 

 WSA

Æ·53

Cebolla Wilderness

El Malpais WSA

R12w R11w

T6n

T10n

El Malpais 

 WSA

Chain of Craters Back Country Byway

Produced by the BLM New Mexico State Office Geographic Sciences Team 

Santa Fe, New Mexico 

Æÿ42

Æ·53

Zuni-Acoma Trailhead

Æ·117

Æÿ42

T7n

To

a

n

d

Grants

 ̈¦§40

Bureau of Land Management

Forest Service

National Park Service

Private

State

Tribal

State Highway

County Road

Continental Divide 

National Scenic Trail

Other WSA

El Malpais WSA

BLM Wilderness

Chain of Craters

 Backcountry 

 Byway
#### YELLOW CAB COMPANY OF BOCA RATON, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. AIROCAR, INC., and Broward County, a political subdivision, Appellees.

No. 76-702.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 22, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 15, 1977.

Richard B. Austin of Law Office of Richard B. Austin, Miami, for appellant.

R. T. Shankweiler of Patterson, Maloney & Shankweiler, Fort Lauderdale, and John P. Bond of Bond & Woitesek, Miami, for appellees.

*202PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record on appeal and briefs of the respective parties, we determine the trial court did not err in enjoining appellant from providing transportation service from the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport, Broward County, Florida, until appellant had secured appropriate authority from the Florida Public Service Commission. Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, DOWNEY and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.
# Installation Operations employee, food drive volunteer is DLA Troop Support's Employee of the Month

/ Published Dec. 8, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 

Leonard Shannon is the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support Employee of the Month for October. Shannon is a material handler for DLA Installation Support. 

He recently oversaw the delivery of more than 500 new office chairs to DLA Philadelphia employees. And while doing so, he often helped employees make their workspace more ergonomic to minimize physical discomfort.

He’s been an integral part of DLA Philadelphia’s annual Fed Feed Families food drive. He’s volunteered the last three years to collect employee food donations daily from 11 locations on Naval Support Activity Philadelphia.

He also validates the expiration dates, weighs and packs the food, and then palletizes the donations for transport. Shannon helped collect 3,305 pounds of food that were donated to Philabundance, the Philadelphia area’s largest hunger relief organization.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 1, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60414 Summary Calendar

SHAHEEN SALIM MERCHANT; SAFRAZ MERCHANT; SOEEN MERCHANT, Petitioners,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA Nos. A70 951 035 A70 951 036 A78 877 114

-------------------- Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Shaheen Salim Merchant (“Merchant”) and her sons, Safraz Merchant and Soeen Merchant, all natives and citizens of India, petition for review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision to deny Merchant’s application for asylum. Safraz Merchant and Soeen Merchant concede that their immigration status is dependent on whether Merchant is eligible for asylum. Merchant has waived the denial of her applications for withholding of removal andNo. 04-60414 -2- relief under the Convention Against Torture by failing to argue those issues. Calderon-Ontiveros v. INS , 809 F.2d 1050, 1052 (5th Cir. 1986). This court will uphold the BIA’s factual finding that an alien is not eligible for asylum if the determination is supported by substantial evidence. Efe v. Ashcroft , 293 F.3d 899, 903 (5th Cir. 2002). “The substantial evidence standard requires only that the Board’s conclusion be based upon the evidence presented and be substantially reasonable.” Ontunez-Tursios v. Ashcroft , 303 F.3d 341, 350 (5th Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). Because the BIA adopted the findings and conclusions of the IJ in this case, we review the decision of the IJ. Efe , 293 F.3d at 903. Merchant has failed to make the requisite showing that she is unable or unwilling to return to India “because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion . . . .” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A); see also Faddoul v. INS , 37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED.