alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter                ended January 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934                (15                U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:              March 14,              2007 |                                        |           |
|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|----------------|
|                                            |                                             |
|                                       |                                   |      |
|                                                 | By:                               | /s/Alex Werber |
|                                            | Name:              Alex Werber              |
|                                            | Title: Chief Financial              Officer |

----
PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE AND 1987 1002 AREA
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THE U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT PLATE 1
146° 145° 144° 143° 142° 3

142°

rter

J we KIC Lands
70°} of ° i ‘ sails 70° ‘hl
2,
, Lr
a (pe
pe ee
fh
c a
$y
g 2
s
AB
2 A
> PS) za
g K. i}
Z, a a Mountain:
by, e
Valley
cn %
Shublik ese 2 Shublik
69°|__ a 69° 69°|
30° a 9 = —130° 30' ss + {gee
mee oe BR 0-70) -K RAN/GE
Third Range
mi : BY
‘Schrader ES
: zy |
146° 145° 144° 143° 142° 145° 144° 743° Te
A. Potential national natural landmarks and archeological and other special sites B. Fishery resources
146° 145° 144° 143° 142°
Barter
Islan
J ot KIC Lands
cial dl 70°
g + a By:
SS Ss >? ries alee:
gy s Ores cama th
ro Vis) PaaS
pee y ee
pees Se === == | eo VA
==> + "9 =o
a A a s 5 3
a & c
ema . ss
ee 1 OO & ARE
& gs & &
yy (3 S
10-20 @ g &
— YY
we ee ‘a y 2 /
o —( & &
« $ Pe é
s A i
x
(Di J z
htt. Ns 5
Sadlerochit Mountains. 3 a EY
& ta
8 ca
Shublik Molnar Mountains
eae 20-40,in midsummer ‘ ge i
125-175 remainder of year \
4-8 blk
a RAN/JGE Sera
rae 4 Third Range
1 a | 4
146° 143° 142° 144°

D. Brown bear

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, scale 1:250,000;
Barter Istand, Demarcation Point, and

EXPLANATION OF FULL-LEASING DATA
Flaxman Island, 1955. Limited revision 1983

2 Limited rev [Data from figure V-1, this report]
Mt Michelson, 1986. Limited revision 1983 Possible facilities Possible facilities
Central production facility ete Airstrip—30 or 130 acres
a 90 acres ——— Haul road
a a Oractes Wie | ae Seer Connecting road
Drill pad A Seawater-treatment plant
. 23 acres ° Port facility
Pipeline B_ Assessment block discussed in text

SCALE 1:500000

10 0 10 20 30 40 50 MILES
SS 1
10 i] 10 20 30 40 50 KILOMETERS
ot — 3}

MAPS OF ARCHEOLOGICAL AND NATURAL AREAS, FISHERY, MOOSE, BROWN BEAR, AND
POLAR BEAR RESOURCES IN THE 1002 AREA, ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, ALASKA

Compiled by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

EXPLANATION

Confirmed coastal denning areas %
Pokok Lagoon bluffs and Niguanak uplands
so Mouth and lower reaches of Canning and Staines r fs

Rivers and adjacent foothills
Marsh and Carter Creeks and lower foothills of Sad-
lerochit Mountains

\
© Known den sites 1951-86—Radio-tagging and systematic E Z
searches for bear dens began in 1982. Prior to that
time dens were located opportunistically, except for 5
aerial surveys in 1974 and 1975 3

i
146° 143° 142°

E. Polar bear
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24314]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

September 5, 1997.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

U.S. Customs Service (CUS)

    OMB Number: 1515-0013.
    Form Number: CF 3171.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Application-Permit-Special License Unlading/Lading, Overtime 
Services.
    Description: Customs Form 3171 is used by commercial carriers and 
importers as a request for permission to unlade imported merchandise, 
baggage, or passengers and for overtime services of Customs officers in 
connection with lading or unlading of merchandise, or the entry or 
clearance of a vessel, including the boarding of a vessel for 
preliminary supplies, ship's stores, sea stores, or equipment not to be 
reladen, which is subject to free or duty-paid entry.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,500.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 6 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 39,900 hours.

    OMB Number: 1515-0022.
    Form Number: CF 4315.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Application for Allowance in Duties.
    Description: This collection is required by the Customs Service in 
instances of claims of damaged or defective merchandise on which an 
allowance in duty is made in the liquidation of the entry. The 
information is used to substantiate importers claims for such duty 
allowances.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 12,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 8 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 1,600 hours.
    Clearance Officer: J. Edgar Nichols, (202) 927-1426, U.S. Customs 
Service, Printing and Records Management Branch, Room 6216, 1301 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20229.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10202, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-24314 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4820-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48259-48260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24284]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records Notice

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.
ACTION: Notice to amend record systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: 
    The Department of the Army proposes to amend the preamble to the 
Army's compilation of Privacy Act systems of records notices. The 
amendment consists of deleting the For more information contact: 
paragraph, and adding two new paragraphs.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 15, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Privacy Act Officer, Records Management 
Program Division, U.S.

[[Page 48260]]

Army Total Personnel Command, ATTN: TAPC-PDR-P, Stop C55, Ft. Belvoir, 
VA 22060-5576.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Janice Thornton at (703) 806-4390 
or DSN 656-4390.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of the Army's record system 
notices for records systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register 
and are available from the address above.
    The Department of the Army proposes to amend the preamble to the 
Army's compilation of Privacy Act systems of records notices. The 
amendment consists of deleting the For more information contact: 
paragraph, and adding two new paragraphs as follows.
    Dated: September 9, 1997.

L. M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
* * * * *

For Further Assistance:

    Any questions should be addressed to the Privacy Act Officer, 
Records Management Program Division, U.S. Army Total Personnel Command, 
ATTN: TAPC-PDR-P, Stop C55, Ft. Belvoir, VA 22060-5576.

Point of Contact:

    Ms. Janice Thornton at (703) 806-4390 or DSN 656-4390.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 97-24284 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-F
```

CERTIFICATION OF 10-QSB REPORT OF INFORM WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC.

FOR THE QUARTER March 31, 2004

1.   The undersigned are the Chief Executive  Officer,  Chief Financial  Officer
     and Treasurer of Inform Worldwide Holdings, Inc. This Certification is made
     pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002.  This
     Certification  accompanies the 10-QSB Report of Inform Worldwide  Holdings,
     Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.

2.   We certify that such 10-QSB Report fully complies with the  requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  exchange Act of 1934 and that the
     information  contained  in  such  10-QSB  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material  respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of
     Inform Worldwide Holdings, Inc.

This Certification is executed as of May 14, 2004.

                                                               /s/ Anthony Clanton
                                                              -----------------------------------
                                                              Anthony Clanton
                                                              Title:   Chief Executive, Financial and
                                                                       Accounting Officer

                                                               /s/ Donald Plekenpol
                                                              -----------------------------------
                                                              Donald Plekenpol
                                                              Title:   Treasurer, Secretary and Director
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 12, 2013

No. 04-13-00504-CV

EX PARTE Gabriel SALAS

Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

On July 29, 2013, relator filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. This court is of the 

opinion that a serious question concerning the relief sought with respect to relator’s contention 

that he was not informed of his right to counsel or right to request appointed counsel requires 

further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in 

interest may file a response to the petition in this court no later than August 23, 2013. Any 

such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

It is so ORDERED on August 12, 2013.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011CI06284, styled In the Interest of C.M.S., et al. Minor Children, 

pending in the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Nick Catoe Jr. presiding.
#### Glen RUSSELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-167.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 23, 1970.

Timothy A. Curran of Sam E. Murrell & Sons, Orlando, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and J. Terrell Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals conviction and judgment entered thereon of assault with intent to commit first degree murder and breaking and entering a vehicle with intent to commit a crime. We reverse.

Defendant’s principal assertion of error surrounds statements made by the prosecutor to the jury during argument, inclusive of which is the following:

> “People are getting killed and I submit to you if we let this individual go in so*155ciety, possibly something will happen will effect [sic], that an innocent party, another innocent party could possibly get killed by this individual.

> “MR. MURRELL: I object to that, Your Honor.

> “MR. WILHELM: You brought it out.

> “THE COURT: Have a seat, Mr. Mur-rell. Wind it up, Mr. Wilhelm.

> “MR. WILHELM: Yes, sir.

> *t<** * ***

> “He was the one that performed the act that night of September 23rd, 1967, and he should be made to pay for that crime because if we don’t have that, we are going to have a breakdown in society and we are going to have people getting stabbed all over Orange County.

> “MR. MURRELL: I object to that, Your Honor.

> “THE COURT: The objection will be noted in the record.”

With commendable candor, the State admits in its brief:

> “The Transcript of Trial Testimony shows that the trial judge neither sustained the Appellant’s objections, nor gave the jury any cautionary instruction with regard to the above-cited remarks. We do not find that such statements were supported by anything in the record, nor do we find that they constituted a justifiable reply to any comment of defense counsel in his closing argument to the jury.

> “Therefore, we are inclined to think that these above comments of the prosecutor fall within the condemnation of the decisions in the following cases: Grant v. State, 194 So.2d 612 (Fla.1967); Stewart v. State, 51 So.2d 494 (Fla. 1951); Chavez v. State, 215 So.2d 750 (Fla.App.2d 1968); and Davis v. State, 214 So.2d 41 (Fla.App.3d 1968).

> “It further appears that the nature of these statements made by the prosecutor, when considered in light of the above-cited decisions, would render a ‘harmless error’ contention entirely inappropriate in this cause.”

We agree. Inflammatory and abusive statements are not to be indulged in. These were highly prejudicial.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

McCAIN, REED, and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Record ofDiscussion Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD

With whom outside the FAA has this action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

### Boeing_ Mike Fitzsimmons 8115/2012 Concur. ATA 

### Joe White 8115/2012 No response.

Other/ Additional Information: 

### N/A
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50594
Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICKY HINOJOS MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas

(M0-97-CR-3-1)

May 27, 1998
Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Court-appointed counsel for Ricky Hinojos Munoz has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent revi ew of the brief, the record, and Munoz’s

response discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is

excused from further r esponsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.
# Far East District prepares for move to Humphreys with container removal

/ Published Jan. 9, 2017
In preparation for the Far East District's relocation to Camp Humphreys in Pyeongtaek, the Logistics Management Office turned in six 20-feet containers to the Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services on Dec. 22, 2016.To prepare disposal of these containers, the supply branch began consolidation of its assets and supplies several years ago. The district began disposing of unnecessary items, issuing supplies we no longer need to other units on the peninsula (i.e. printer cartridges that we do not have printers for), and coordinating with other sections ensuring they maintain 30 days of supplies for their immediate need.  The results of these efforts enabled us to empty out all six containers.  The task to get these containers ready for turn-in did not stop there. The supply branch coordinated with Ken Pickler, Far East District transportation branch chief, 25th Transportation Battalion, USAG-Yongsan Directorate of Public Works and the Defense Reutilization Management Services to ensure the entire process was synchronized. The turn-in date with DRMS must be scheduled prior to scheduling a transportation appointment. Once the turn in date was confirmed and notification sent to 25th Transportation, coordination was made between the local crane and forklift vendor to schedule an execution date to lift and load these containers on the flatbeds.  After the execution date was confirmed, the supply branch coordinated with the district’s transportation branch and U.S. Army Garrison-Yongsan DPW to disconnect all the power lines and separate all containers that are welded together.  Without the prior synchronization and planning by both the supply and transportation branch chiefs this event would not have been successful.  To ensure mission success, Ken Pickler also trained the supply and motor pool personnel on critical lift tasks and safety standards a week in advance. Finally, because everyone involved took extra measures, this event occurred without a hitch and without any safety incidents and violations.  Outstanding leadership from Ed Minnerly, chief of the district’s Logistics Management Office. I would also like to extend my thanks to all personnel involved from supply and transportation branches.  This is an example of what can happen with prior planning and early coordination with outside agencies. *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Far East District website.*
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 29, 2023

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00492-CR

JOSHUA OFARON WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 209th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1632019

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant appeals his conviction for murder.0F

1 See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §

19.02(b). Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which counsel concludes 

the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements 

of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional 

1 Appellant also pleaded true to a prior conviction for felony possession with intent to 

deliver a controlled substance.
2

evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to 

be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than 

60 days have passed and no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in 

the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief 

or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for 

review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Spain. 

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
#### RENZETTI v. MIAMI HERALD PUBLISHING CO.

No. 38626.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Case 4:03-cv-02362-JEJ-DB Document 24 Filed 04/10/06 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1933 

To provide for the inclusion of Department of Defense property on Santa 

Rosa and Okaloosa Island, Florida, in the Gulf Islands National Seashore 

if the property is ever excess to the needs of the Armed Forces. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 27, 2005 

Mr. MARTINEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide for the inclusion of Department of Defense property on Santa Rosa and Okaloosa Island, Florida, in 

the Gulf Islands National Seashore if the property is 

ever excess to the needs of the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF EXCESS DEPARTMENT OF DE4 FENSE PROPERTY ON SANTA ROSA AND 

5 OKALOOSA ISLAND IN GULF ISLANDS NA6 TIONAL SEASHORE. 

7 Section 7 of Public Law 91–660 (16 U.S.C. 459h– 

8 6) is amended— 
2 

•S 1933 IS

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘There are’’; and 

2 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub3 section: 

4 ‘‘(b) If any of the Federal land on Santa Rosa or 

5 Okaloosa Island, Florida, under the jurisdiction of the De6 partment of Defense is ever excess to the needs of the 

7 Armed Forces, the Secretary of Defense shall transfer, 

8 without reimbursement, the excess land to the administra9 tive jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior. The Sec10 retary of the Interior shall administer the transferred land 

11 as part of the seashore in accordance with the provisions 

12 of this Act.’’. 

Æ
**U.S. Vegetable and Melon Production (91014)**
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.    Date: May 20, 2011/s/ William Yan Sui HuiWilliam Yan Sui Hui,Chief Executive Officer