alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE**

**SECURITIES      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.     | I                  have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F/A of Algoma Steel                  Inc.;                  and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.     | Based                  on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement                  of a                  material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make                  the                  statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such                  statements                  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by                  this                  report. |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 177 (Friday, September 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24240]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-5484-3]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7167 or (202) 564-7153. Weekly receipt of 
Environmental Impact Statements filed September 2, 1997 through 
September 5, 1997 pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 970350, Draft EIS, COE, CA, Upper Guadalupe River Feasibility 
Study, Flood Control Protection, Construction, National Economic 
Development Plan (NED), Santa Clara Valley Water District, City of San 
Jose, Santa Clara County, CA, Due: October 27, 1997, Contact: William 
DeJager (415) 977-8670.
EIS No. 970351, Draft EIS, BLM, NV, Olinghouse Mine Project, 
Construction of Two Open Pits, Waste Dump, Haul Road and Cyanide Heap 
Leach Pads, Plan-of-Operation, Carson City, Washoe County, NV, Due: 
November 14, 1997, Contact: Terri Knutson (702) 885-6156.
EIS No. 970352, Draft EIS, FHW, WA, NE 8TH/I-405 Interchange Project, 
Construction, Funding, Right-of-Way Use Permit and NPDES Stormwater 
Permit, City of Bellevue, King County, WA, Due: October 27, 1997, 
Contact: Gene Fong (425) 452-6827.
EIS No. 970353, Draft Supplement, COE, CA, Sacramento River Bank 
Protection Project, Implemention of Streambank Protection for the Lower 
American River between RM-0 and 13.7, Updated Information, City of 
Sacramento, Sacramento County, CA, Due: October 27, 1997, Contact: Matt 
Davis (916) 557-1534.
EIS No. 970354, Final EIS, AFS, WA, Long Draw Salvage Sale, 
Implementation, Okanogan National Forest, Tonasket Ranger District, 
Okanogan County, WA, Due: October 14, 1997, Contact: John Townsley 
(509) 826-3568.
EIS No. 970355, Final EIS, AFS, AZ, Eastern Roosevelt Lake Watershed 
Analysis Area Grazing Strategy and Associated Range Improvements 
Management Plan, Development and Implementation, Tonto National Forest, 
Tonto Basin Ranger District, Gila County, AZ, Due: October 14, 1997, 
Contact: Linny Warren (520) 467-3200.
EIS No. 970356, Final EIS, FHW, VA, DC, MD, Woodrow Wilson Bridge 
Improvement, I-95 from the Telegraph Road/Capital Beltway Interchange 
in Alexandria, VA to the MD-210/Capital Beltway Interchange in Oxon 
Hill, MD, Funding, Section 10 and 404 Permits and CGD Bridge Permit, 
Fairfax County, VA; Prince George's County, MD, and DC, Due: October 
14, 1997, Contact: David C. Lawton (410) 962-0077.

Amended Notices

    EIS No. 970290, Final EIS, FHW, CO, CO-82 Highway Transportation 
Project, Improvements to ``Entrance to Aspen'', Funding and COE Section 
404 Permit, City of Aspen, Pitkin County, CO, Due: October 6, 1997, 
Contact: Ron Speral (303) 969-6737. Published FR-09-12-97--Review 
Period Reestablished.

    Dated: September 9, 1997.
William D. Dickerson,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 97-24240 Filed 9-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
#### EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU v. DEPENDENTS OF Herbert Robert RAMSEY, Deceased, and Sim Ramsey, Individually.

No. 49732.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 23, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 14, 1977.

Riddick, McCoy & Wilkins, Joseph L. McCoy, Jackson, for appellant.

J. Harold Graham, Jr., Crystal Springs, for appellees.

Watkins & Eager, Velia Ann Mayer, Jackson, for Fairchild Livestock Commission, Inc.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Simpson County; George B. Grubbs, Judge.

Before INZER, P. J., and WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER WITHDRAWING MEDIATION ORDER

Appellate case name: Velocity Databank, Inc. and Tom Pelatari d/b/a Velocity Databank, 

Inc. v. Shell Offshore Inc., Shell Oil Company, Shell Exploration & 

Production Company and Faye Schubert

Appellate case number: 01-13-00454-CV

Date motion filed: August 14, 2013

Type of Motion: Objection to Mediation

Party filing motion: Appellee

Trial court case number: 2011-68029

Trial court: 295th District Court of Harris County

It is ORDERED that Appellee’s objection to mediation is granted. We withdraw 

our Mediation Order dated August 1, 2013.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

 x Acting individually 

Date: August 19, 2013i

 

i

Absent emergency or a statement that the motion is unopposed, must wait ten days before acting on motion except for 

motion to extend time to file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a).

Note: Single justice may grant or deny any request for relief properly sought by motion, except in a civil case a single justice 

should not: (1) act on a petition for an extraordinary writ or (2) dismiss or otherwise determine an appeal or a motion 

for rehearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.4(a).
Case 4:05-cv-01818-JEJ Document 141 Filed 09/14/06 Page 1 of 8
Case 4:05-cv-01818-JEJ Document 141 Filed 09/14/06 Page 2 of 8
Case 4:05-cv-01818-JEJ Document 141 Filed 09/14/06 Page 3 of 8
Case 4:05-cv-01818-JEJ Document 141 Filed 09/14/06 Page 4 of 8
Case 4:05-cv-01818-JEJ Document 141 Filed 09/14/06 Page 5 of 8
Case 4:05-cv-01818-JEJ Document 141 Filed 09/14/06 Page 6 of 8
Case 4:05-cv-01818-JEJ Document 141 Filed 09/14/06 Page 7 of 8
Case 4:05-cv-01818-JEJ Document 141 Filed 09/14/06 Page 8 of 8
Request for exemption to FAA Rule 333

By

Name: Kevin Wilson

Address: 304 Otmoor Lane Cary, NC 27519

E-mail – wilsonkw2@gmail.com

Phone: 919-656-7626

I seek to utilize my UAS Drone (DJI Phantom 2 and 3 – both less than 55 lbs.) in my real estate 

photography business for financial gain. I will abide by the safe operation as follows:

 Fly no more than 200 feet high

 Maintain visual contact with the aircraft at all times

 Fly only during daylight hours

 Insure no people or pets are within flying radius 

 Maintain a safe distance (5 miles or more) from any airport and be vigilant for any maned craft 

that may be spotted

 Maintain aircraft in accordance with DJI instruction

By following the above safe operating guidelines/procedures I feel that I would not adversely affect the 

safety or others in the air or on the ground.

I do not intend to utilize this exemption outside the United States and will most likely not exercise this 

exemption outside North Carolina.

I have a working relationship with several real estate franchises in the Raleigh Cary area of NC, there is 

much interest in aerial photograph and feel that my drone photography business will be an asset to 

these real estate businesses.
Case 4:05-cv-01786-JEJ Document 86 Filed 02/03/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:05-cv-01786-JEJ Document 86 Filed 02/03/06 Page 2 of 2
### An appraisal of the possibilities of artificial recharge to ground-water supplies in part of the Roswell basin, New Mexico

By: Ward Sundt MottsRobert L. Cushman

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1785

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        An appraisal of the possibilities of artificial recharge to ground-water supplies in part of the Roswell basin, New Mexico(1963)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Hank JOHNSON v. Matthew S. BRANIFF, Judge, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans.

No. 60108.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 2, 1977.

In re: Hank Johnson applying for writ of mandamus.

Writ denied. The trial court having acted on the application, this mandamus action is moot.
#### Steven F. WELLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Dennis Glenn TRUHETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. L-128, L-136.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

July 22, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Life Time
Fitness, Inc.
 Dated:  October 30, 2009 /s/ Bahram AkradiBahram AkradiChairman of the Board of Directors and Chief
Executive Officer/s/ Michael R. RobinsonMichael R. RobinsonExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer 28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

HAZEL C. COOPER, : 4:CV-04-2166

Plaintiff : (Judge McClure)

v. : (Magistrate Judge Smyser)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, :

Commissioner of Social Security,

:

Defendant

O R D E R

 May 11, 2005

BACKGROUND: 

The plaintiff has brought this civil action under the authority of 42 U.S.C. 

§ 405(g) to obtain judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social

Security denying the claim of the plaintiff for Social Security disability insurance

benefits.

The case was initially referred to United States Magistrate Judge J. Andrew

Smyser. 

Magistrate Judge Smyser filed a fourteen page report and recommendation

on April 21, 2005. He concluded with the recommendation that the case should be

remanded to the Commissioner for further consideration of all of the evidence

relevant to the plaintiff’s credibility, including her work history, the effects of her

Case 4:04-cv-02166-JFM Document 16 Filed 05/11/05 Page 1 of 3
2

medications and all witnesses’ statements. If, after the consideration of all of that

evidence, the ALJ determines that a job with a sit-stand option can be performed

but that no further refinement of the sit/stand option is necessary, that should be

explained. 

On May 10, 2005, the Commissioner waived the opportunity to object to the

report and recommendation. 

The court agrees with the analysis of the magistrate judge and his

recommendation and will order a remand. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

J. Andrew Smyser (record document no. 14, filed April 21, 2005) is approved and

adopted in full for the reasons set forth therein. 

2. The case is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for

additional consideration of all of the evidence relevant to the plaintiff’s credibility,

including her work history, the effects of her medications and all witnesses’

statements. If, after the consideration of all of that evidence, the ALJ determines

that a job with a sit-stand option can be performed but that no further refinement of

the sit/stand option is necessary, that should be explained. 

Case 4:04-cv-02166-JFM Document 16 Filed 05/11/05 Page 2 of 3
3

3. The clerk is directed to close the case file. 

 s/ James F. McClure, Jr. 

James F. McClure, Jr.

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-02166-JFM Document 16 Filed 05/11/05 Page 3 of 3
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0325.txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:26PM -----

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US 

Date: 02/08/2010 04:14PM 

Subject: resolution of ULSD benefits issue 

Hi Cortney, 

Regarding the questions raised about the appropriateness of estimating emission reductions 

and benefits from the use of ULSD, we have discussed the issue and determined that due to 

the uncertainty regarding the number of engines that would switch to ULSD based on our 

rule, we will discuss the issue more qualitatively. Below is the suggested language for the 

RIA and preamble, let me know what you think. 

Here is suggested language: 

In this analysis, we have not quantified the benefits attributable to the SO2 reductions that 

would occur as a result of these engines switching to ultra-low sulfur fuel (ULSD). Although 

we are confident that some SO2 reductions would occur as a result of this rule, we are 

unable to estimate the percentage of engines that may switch to ULSD in the absence of this 

rule. As a PM2.5 precursor, these SO2 emission reductions would lead to fewer PM2.5-

related health effects. Because of uncertainty in the magnitude of the attributable SO2 

reductions and to avoid the appearance of double-counting, we have chosen to not include 

these estimates in any of the results tables or graphics in this RIA. If without this rule none 

of the affected engines would use ULSD, then we estimate the monetized PM2.5-related 

health co-benefits from SO2 reductions would be $120 to $290 million in 2013 (2008$, 3% 

discount rate). If all of the affected engines would use ULSD regardless of the rule, then the 

monetized co-benefits would be zero. 

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov 

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0325.txt2/19/2010 12:50:38 PM
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Summaryof ... accomplishments**
 
2008 | 2009| 2010 | 2011
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.89/2:
Item Number:0646-R-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001065535
 
July 30, 2018
#### The AMERICAN ROAD INSURANCE COMPANY v. Frank MONTGOMERY et al.

No. 61713.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 17, 1978.

In re: Frank Montgomery, et al applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 354 So.2d 656.

Denied.

TATE, J.,

dissents: The highway department is solidarily liable because of its concurrent fault under La.Civ.C. art. 2317.

MARCUS, J.,

concurs in the denial. See *Gallien v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.,*353 So.2d 1127 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1977) writ denied, 354 So.2d 1379 (La.1978).
#### The FONTAINEBLEAU HOTEL and Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Stanley GOODRICH and The Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 40549.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 8, 1971.

Rehearing. Denied April 14, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JT., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23327]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Announcement: Availability of Environmental Assessment for the 
Southside Barrier Project

    The National Park Service, at the request of the Department of the 
Treasury, has prepared an Environmental Assessment for a construction 
project to replace temporary security barriers around the south side of 
the White House. The document is available for review and public 
comment through September 30, 1997.
    Copies may be requested by calling the National Park Service, White 
House Liaison, at (202) 619-6344 weekdays from 9 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. 
Written requests may be sent to 1100 Ohio Drive, SW., Room 344, 
Washington, D.C. 20242.

    Dated: August 20, 1997.
Stan E. Lock,
Deputy Director, White House Liaison.
[FR Doc. 97-23327 Filed 8-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
#### Larry SCHULER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-402.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 9, 1970.

Brian T. Hayes, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order appealed is hereby affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
#### Dianne Hughes DEAN v. GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION, a/k/a General Finance Loan Company of Baton Rouge.

No. 11576.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

July 11, 1977.

James J. Zito, Baton Rouge, of counsel, for plaintiff appellee, Dianne Hughes Dean.

John F. McKay, Baton Rouge, of counsel, for defendant appellant, General Finance Corp. a/k/a General Finance Loan Co. of Baton Rouge,

Before ELLIS, CHIASSON and PONDER, JJ.

CHIASSON, Judge.

This matter is before this Court, ex pro-prio motu, so we may determine if the appeal of General Finance Corporation should be dismissed for the failure to timely file an appeal bond.

On December 9, 1976, the District Court read and signed a judgment in favor of Dianne Hughes Dean, plaintiff, and against General Finance Corporation, defendant, dissolving a writ of *fieri facias*and garnishment filed by the defendant and awarding the plaintiff $150.00 as attorney’s fees. The defendant applied for a devolutive appeal from this judgment on March 9, 1977. On March 10, 1977, the appeal was granted and the appeal bond set at $250.00. On May 10, 1977, the appeal bond was filed.

A devolutive appeal must be taken and security furnished within sixty days of the expiration of the delay for applying for a new trial when a timely application for a new trial is not made or within sixty days of the denial of a timely application for a new trial. C.C.P. Art. 2087.

The delay for applying for a new trial is seven days, exclusive of legal holidays. C.C.P. Art. 1974.

In this case the delay for applying for a new trial expired on December 20, 1976. Consequently, the delay for perfecting a devolutive appeal expired on February 18, 1977. Neither the application for the appeal nor the appeal bond were timely filed.

Appellate Courts do not acquire jurisdiction of an appeal which is not timely perfected. *Taylor v. Harvey,*La.App., 340 So.2d 1072 (1st Cir. 1976).

Therefore, the defendant’s appeal is dismissed at its cost.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
No. 00-7419.

#### Hunter *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2416]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-32,983]


Rohr Industries Riverside, California; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation 
was initiated on December 2, 1996 in response to a worker petition 
which was filed on behalf of workers and former workers at Rohr 
Industries, located in Riverside, California (TA-W-32,983).
    All workers were separated from the subject firm more than one year 
prior to the date of the petition (November 11, 1996). Section 223 of 
the Trade Act of 1974 specifies that no certification may apply to any 
worker whose last separation occurred more than one year before the 
date of the petition. Consequently, further investigation in this case 
would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 16th day of January 1997.
Curtis K. Kooser,
Acting Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-2416 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M