alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2041

AN ACT

To provide for the conveyance of a United States Fish and

Wildlife Service administrative site to the city of Las

Vegas, Nevada.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ed Fountain Park Ex5 pansion Act’’.
 †

2

S 2041 ES

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

2 In this Act:

3 (1) ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.—The term ‘‘admin4 istrative site’’ means the parcel of real property

5 identified as ‘‘Lands to be Conveyed to the City of

6 Las Vegas; approximately, 7.89 acres’’ on the map

7 entitled ‘‘Ed Fountain Park Expansion’’ and dated

8 November 1, 2005.

9 (2) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the city of

10 Las Vegas, Nevada.

11 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means

12 the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Di13 rector of the United States Fish and Wildlife Serv14 ice.

15 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF UNITED STATES FISH AND WILD16 LIFE SERVICE ADMINISTRATIVE SITE, LAS

17 VEGAS, NEVADA.

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall convey to the

19 City, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of

20 the United States in and to the administrative site for use

21 by the City—

22 (1) as a park; or

23 (2) for any other recreation or nonprofit-related

24 purpose.

25 (b) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—As a condition of

26 the conveyance under subsection (a), the Secretary shall
†

3

S 2041 ES

1 require that the City pay the administrative costs of the

2 conveyance, including survey costs and any other costs as3 sociated with the conveyance.

4 (c) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—If the Secretary determines

6 that the City is not using the administrative site for

7 a purpose described in paragraph (1) or (2) of sub8 section (a), all right, title, and interest of the City

9 in and to the administrative site (including any im10 provements to the administrative site) shall revert,

11 at the option of the Secretary, to the United States.

12 (2) HEARING.—Any determination of the Sec13 retary with respect to a reversion under paragraph

14 (1) shall be made—

15 (A) on the record; and

16 (B) after an opportunity for a hearing.

Passed the Senate July 11, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2041

AN ACT

To provide for the conveyance of a United States

the city of Las Vegas, Nevada.Fish and Wildlife Service administrative site to
256 La. 261

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Edmund HARRIS, Robert Wayne Harris, Willis Harris, Jr.

No. 50646.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Robert Wayne Harris applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writs refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2411]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Program Manager of the Office of 
Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at American Banknote Co., 
Bedford Park, Illinois. The review indicated that the application 
contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly 
on the Department's determination. Therefore, dismissal of the 
application was issued.

NAFTA-01262; American Banknote Company, Bedford Park, Illinois 
(January 15, 1997)

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 21st day of January, 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy & Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-2411 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS REFERENCED TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      15,474,030
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  448,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                    36,100
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,119,697
<PP&E>                                         855,292
<DEPRECIATION>                                 232,334
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,489,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,287,166
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,861
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,170,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,489,153
<SALES>                                        942,426
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               942,426
<CGS>                                          194,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  194,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,640,703)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,640,703)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,640,703)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
STEVEN E. BEAVER,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-0340

Opinion filed May 7, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Steven E. Beaver, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Shirley W. Durham, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee; Jennifer Parker, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED as moot. See Ward v. State, 770 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) 

(dismissing a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on 

the pleading pending below). 

WOLF, THOMAS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit
21.1
  SUBSIDIARIES
   Perfect
Dream Limited, a corporation established under the laws of the British Virgin
Islands
  Goldenway
Nanjing Garments Co., Ltd, a foreign-owned limited liability company formed
under the laws of the People's Republic of China
  Nanjing
Catch-Luck Garments Co., Ltd., a foreign-owned limited liability company
formed under the laws of the People’s Republic of China
  Nanjing
New-Tailun Garments Co., Ltd., a foreign-owned limited liability company
formed under the laws of the People’s Republic of China
 
 Shanghai
La Go Go Fashion Company Limited, a limited liability company formed under
the laws of the People’s Republic of China
 
 Ever-Glory
International Group Apparel Inc. a limited liability company formed under
the laws of the People’s Republic of China
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Paul Hawran, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Sequenom, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that,
to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Quarterly
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d), of the Exchange Act, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Quarterly Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has set their hands hereto as of the 31st day of October, 2008.



/s/ Paul HawranPaul HawranChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------
                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                              A Nevada corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlphaTrade.com (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon Muir, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



         Dated: November 15, 2010                   /s/ Gordon J. Muir
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Its: Chief Executive Officer


            A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
            or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
            adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
            electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
            the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
            Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The
            foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q
            solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
            (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
            United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q
            or as a separate disclosure document.














                                Exhibit 32.1 - 1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsWater immersion and its computer simulation as analogs of weightlessnessExperimental studies and computer simulations of water immersion are summarized and discussed with regard to their utility as analogs of weightlessness. Emphasis is placed on describing and interpreting the renal, endocrine, fluid, and circulatory changes that take place during immersion. A mathematical model, based on concepts of fluid volume regulation, is shown to be well suited to simulate the dynamic responses to water immersion. Further, it is shown that such a model provides a means to study specific mechanisms and pathways involved in the immersion response. A number of hypotheses are evaluated with the model related to the effects of dehydration, venous pressure disturbances, the control of ADH, and changes in plasma-interstitial volume. By inference, it is suggested that most of the model's responses to water immersion are plausible predictions of the acute changes expected, but not yet measured, during space flight. One important prediction of the model is that previous attempts to measure a diuresis during space flight failed because astronauts may have been dehydrated and urine samples were pooled over 24-hour periods.Document ID19840009753Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLeonard, J. I.*(Management and Technical Services Co. Houston, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1982Subject CategoryAerospace MedicineReport/Patent NumberTIR-2114-MED-2005NASA-CR-171746NAS 1.26:171746Accession Number84N17821Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-16328Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840009753.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

SolPac Construction, Inc. d/b/a ) 

Soltek Pacific Construction Company ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912PL-10-D-0038 ) 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61591 

Kirk J. McCormick, Esq. 

Ruberto, Israel & Weiner, P.C. 

Boston, MA 

Michael P. Goodman, Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

John F. Bazan, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorney 

U.S. Army Engineer District 

Los Angeles 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MCNULTY 

It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the 

parties' stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a 

consent judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of 

$1,550,000. This amount is inclusive of interest. No further interest shall be paid. 

Dated: February 28, 2019 

(Signatures continued) 

fl H _j__ /JJ1 11t 1-l--:- ll<l1:':::"-::£ l, /7[ ~.CCC 

CHRIS OPHER M. MCNU\TY 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I concur 

I/\~ 

--=r~\/\ 

----------~-----------------------

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

Administrative 

J~~ Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61591, Appeal of SolPac 

Construction. Inc. d/b/a, Soltek Pacific Construction Company. rendered in 

conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March
25, 2006 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods referred to in the Form 10-Q.
 /s/ Alfred H. DrewesAlfred H. DrewesSenior Vice President andChief Financial OfficerApril 28, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24625]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-115-001]


Sumas International Pipeline, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

September 11, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, Sumas International Pipeline 
Inc. (Sumas) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Original Volume No. 2, the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
October 1, 1997:

Substitute Seventh Revised Sheet No. 4

    Sumas states that the purpose of this filling is to update Sumas' 
tariff to reflect the Annual Charge Adjustment (ACA) factor to be 
effective for the twelve-month period beginning October 1, 1997. Sumas 
states that its new ACA factor will be 0.22 cents per Dth, and increase 
of 0.02 cents per Dth from its current ACA factor.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for pubic inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24625 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Myrtis G. ROBINSON v. David G. MORRISON, a Minor.

No. 46114.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 22, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 12, 1971.

Barnett, Montgomery, McClintock & Cunningham, James W. Nobles, Jr., Jackson, William W. Ferguson, Raymond, for appellant.

Heidelberg, Woodliff & Franks, W. Swan Yerger, Jackson, for appellee.

ROBERTSON, Justice:

Appellant, Myrtis G. Robinson, recovered a judgment for $2500.00 against the Appellee, David G. Morrison, a minor, in the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial District of Hinds County.

This judgment was for personal injuries sustained by her when Morrison ran a red *95light at the intersection of U. S. Highway 80 and Valley Street, and ran head-on into the right side of Mrs. Robinson’s car.

It is necessary for us to note and rule on only one of the three errors assigned. The appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting the appellee a comparative negligence instruction because there was no evidence justifying the granting of such an instruction. We agree and reverse and remand.

The evidence is undisputed that Defendant Morrison was driving west on U. S. Highway 80, that he ran a red light and ran head-on into the right side of Plaintiff Robinson’s car as she proceeded in a northerly direction across the intersection of U. S. Highway 80 and Valley Street. Plaintiff Robinson testified that she stopped at the intersection, waited for the traffic light to change, and when the green light appeared she started across the intersection and was traveling about 5 to 10 miles per hour when hit by the defendant. Investigating Officer Williams testified that Mrs. Robinson’s car laid down about 48 feet of skid marks and that under normal conditions a car would have had to be traveling between 30 and 40 miles an hour when the brakes were applied, to skid 48 feet.

Appellee contends that appellant was traveling at an excessive rate of speed at an intersection. Even if this were true, the speed of appellant’s car had absolutely nothing to do with the accident. The sole proximate cause of the collision was that the appellee ran a red light.

The trial judge recognized this fact when he granted the plaintiff a peremptory instruction as to liability. There was no evidence in the record to support the granting of a comparative negligence instruction.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

All Justices concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1676 

To reduce temporarily the duty on O-Toluidine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on O-Toluidine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF DUTY ON O-TOLUIDINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.39.14 2-Methylaniline (CAS No. 

95–53–4) (provided for in 

subheading 2921.43.90) ...... 1.8% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 
2 

•S 1676 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ