alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Infinex Ventures, Inc. (the
  "Company") on 10Q SB for the period ending January 31, 2004 as filed with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mario
  Aiello, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
  U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
  of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        result of operations of the Company.



|Date:   March 3, 2004 |                              
|--------------------- | -----------------------------
|                      | /s/Mario
      Aiello        
|                      | (Signature)                  
|                      |                              
|                      | Chief Executive
      Officer
|                      | (Title)                      

---
#### James O’NEILL, Appellant, v. James T. SCHOENBROD, the Yacht Andiano and the United States Fire Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 77-1922.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 7, 1978.

Rehearing Denied March 17, 1978.

Dolan, Denman & Grambling and Christopher R. Fertig, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Smathers & Thompson and John W. Keller, III, James T. Schoenbrod, Miami, for appellees.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, James O’Neill, appeals an order dismissing his complaint for salvage for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter on the ground that a salvage action is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal district court sitting in admiralty.

O’Neill contends that since the instant action has been brought in personam (as opposed to in rem), the circuit court for Dade County has concurrent jurisdiction with the federal district court under the “savings to suitors” clause contained in 28 U.S.C. § 1333.

Salvage being a matter peculiarly within the jurisdiction of the admiralty courts because, inter alia, of the peculiar system awarding the compensation, we hold that the trial court correctly dismissed the instant salvage action. See 68 Am.Jur.2d Salvage § 40 (1973).

Affirmed.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 174 / Tuesday, September 9, 1997 / Notices 47531

meetings and rosters of the members of

the Subcommittees may be obtained

from this source.

Dated: August 26, 1997.

By Direction of the Secretary-Designate.

Heyward Bannister,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 97–23754 Filed 9–8–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS

Research and Development

Cooperative Studies Evaluation

Committee Notice of Meeting

The Department of Veterans Affairs

gives notice under Public Law 92–463

(Federal Advisory Committee Act) as

amended, by section 5(c) of Public Law

94–409, that a meeting of the Research

and Development Cooperative Studies

Evaluation Committee will be held at

the Marriott Residence Inn, 550 Army

Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202,

October 8–9, 1997. The session on

October 8 is scheduled to begin at 7:30

a.m. and end at 5:15 p.m. and on

October 9 from 7:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

The meeting will be for the purpose of

reviewing one new protocol for multihospital clinical trial on prophylaxis of

medical patients for thromboembolism

and the progress of five on-going

cooperative studies on treatment of

alcoholic liver fibrosis, betablocker for

heart failure, cancer intervention versus

observation trial, treatment of unstable

angina and evaluation of geriatric cares.

The Committee advises the Chief

Research and Development Officer

through the Chief of the Cooperative

Studies Program on the relevance and

feasibility of the studies, the adequacy

of the protocols, and the scientific

validity and propriety of technical

details, including protection of human

subjects.

The meeting will be open to the

public from 7:30 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. on

both days to discuss the general status

of the program. Those who plan to

attend should contact Dr. Ping Huang,

Coordinator, Medical Research Service

Cooperative Studies Evaluation

Committee, Department of Veterans

Affairs, Washington, DC, (202–273–

8295), prior to October 3, 1997.

The meeting will be closed from 8:00

a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on October 8, 1997,

and from 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., on

October 9, 1997, for consideration of

specific proposals in accordance with

provisions set forth in section 10(d) of

Public Law 92–463, as amended by

section 5(c) of Public Law 94–409, and

5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). During this portion

of the meeting, discussions and

recommendations will deal with

qualifications of personnel conducting

the studies, staff and consultant

critiques of research protocols, and

similar documents, and the medical

records of patients who are study

subjects, the disclosures of which would

constitute a clearly unwarranted

invasion of personal privacy.

Dated: August 26, 1997.

By Direction of the Secretary-Designate.

Heyward Bannister,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 97–23755 Filed 9–8–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320–01–M
Order entered April 22, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 01303 - CR No. 05 - 18 - 01304 - CR JIMMY LAPAUL ANDERSO N, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On A ppeal from the 439th Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 2 - 17 - 0345 & 2 - 17 - 0346



### O RDER Before the Court is the State’s April 18, 2019 second motion for extension of time to file its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER th e State’s brief filed on or before May 20 , 20 19 . If the State’s brief is not filed by May 20 , 20 19 , these appeals may be submitted without the State’s brief.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly report of US Biodefense, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, David Chin, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer, and Scott Perren, acting in the capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ David Chin

David Chin

Chief Executive Officer

July 20, 2004



/s/ Scott Perren

Scott Perren

Chief Financial Officer

July 20, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1999             OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-05-1999             SEP-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1999             OCT-03-1999
<CASH>                                             696                     696
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,374                  53,374
<ALLOWANCES>                                       506                     506
<INVENTORY>                                     49,031                  49,031
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,831                  15,831
<PP&E>                                         158,071                 158,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,355                  13,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 362,023                 362,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,280                 104,280
<BONDS>                                        164,500                 146,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            99                      99
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,954                  81,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   362,023                 362,023
<SALES>                                        117,468                 467,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,468                 467,099
<CGS>                                           62,845                 404,492
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,829                 456,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   284                      33
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,995                  14,733
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (504)                 10,917
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (436)                  5,290
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (940)                  5,627
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (940)                  5,627
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .10                     .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10                     .60


</TABLE>
#### Vincent H. CONBOY v. CITY OF NAPLES.

No. 39060.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 226 So.2d 108.
Certification of CEO under Section 906



Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Donald J. Trump, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|/s/ DONALD J. TRUMP                                                                          
|                                                                                             
|Donald J. Trump Chief Executive Officer of Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. March 30, 2004
EXHIBIT 10.16

                       TERMINATION OF CONSULTING AGREEMENT



     THIS TERMINATION AGREEMENT, entered into this 30th day of July, 2002 by and
between Central  Co-operative Bank,  Somerville,  Massachusetts (the "Bank") and
Joseph R. Doherty (the "Consultant").

     WHEREAS,  the  Bank  and the  Consultant  have  previously  entered  into a
Consulting  Agreement,  dated as of March 31,  1992 and amended as of August 11,
1994 (the "Consulting Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS,  the parties are mutually  desirous of terminating  the Consulting
Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, it is AGREED that the Consulting Agreement be and is hereby
terminated  effective  as of the  date  hereof  and each of the  parties  hereby
releases the other from any and all claims and obligations thereunder.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Termination Agreement on
the day and year first hereinabove written.

ATTEST:                                 CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK


/s/ Rhoda K. Astone                     By: /s/ Gregory W. Boulos
---------------------------                 ----------------------------------
Clerk                                       Chairman of the Finance Committee



WITNESS:                                CONSULTANT


/s/ David W. Kearns                     By: /s/ J. R. Doherty
---------------------------                 ----------------------------------
                                            Joseph R. Doherty
Case 4:05-cv-00716-JEJ Document 12 Filed 04/29/05 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:05-cv-00716-JEJ Document 12 Filed 04/29/05 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:05-cv-00716-JEJ Document 12 Filed 04/29/05 Page 3 of 3
#### James BATTLE v. CITY OF CLEARWATER.

No. 38865.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 3, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
# L_2007001EN.01001801.xml

| 4.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 1/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 1/18

---

DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

of 1 January 2007

appointing judges at the Court of Justice of the European Communities

(2007/7/EC, Euratom)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 223 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 139 thereof,

Having regard to the Act concerning the conditions of accession to the European Union of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded, and in particular Article 46(1) and (2), first subparagraph, thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 46(1) and (2), first subparagraph, of the Act of Accession provides for the appointment of two judges to the Court of Justice. The term of office of one of those judges is to expire on 6 October 2009. This judge is to be chosen by lot. The term of office of the other judge is to expire on 6 October 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 46(1) and (2), first subparagraph, of the Act of Accession provides for the appointment of two judges to the Court of Justice. The term of office of one of those judges is to expire on 6 October 2009. This judge is to be chosen by lot. The term of office of the other judge is to expire on 6 October 2012.

| (2) | Two additional judges at the Court of Justice of the European Communities should therefore be appointed, in accordance with the said Article, after having drawn lots as provided for therein, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Two additional judges at the Court of Justice of the European Communities should therefore be appointed, in accordance with the said Article, after having drawn lots as provided for therein,

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Ms Camelia TOADER is hereby appointed a judge at the Court of Justice of the European Communities for the period from 1 January 2007 to 6 October 2009.

Article 2

Mr Alexander ARABADJIEV is hereby appointed a judge at the Court of Justice of the European Communities for the period from 1 January 2007 to 6 October 2012.

Article 3

This Decision shall take effect on 1 January 2007.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 January 2007.

The President

W. SCHÖNFELDER

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          35,095
<SECURITIES>                                    17,985
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,318
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,518)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,406
<PP&E>                                           6,461
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,948
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,738
<SALES>                                         58,109
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,109
<CGS>                                           21,935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,934
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,533
<INCOME-TAX>                                       399
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,134
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,134
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1084

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner - Appellee,
versus PATRICK J. MUHAMMAD, Respondent - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:05- cv-03144-MJG) Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: October 3, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patrick J. Muhammad, LAW OFFICES OF PATRICK MUHAMMAD, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General of Maryland, Gary W. Kuc, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Patrick J. Muhammad appeals the district court’s order remanding the attorney disciplinary petition filed against him by the Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission (“AGC”) to the Maryland Court of Appeals. The district court granted the AGC’s motion to remand the petition after finding no basis for removal under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1442, or 1443 (2000). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2000), “[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise, except that an order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed pursuant to section 1443 . . . shall be reviewable . . . .” The Supreme Court has limited § 1447(d) to insulate from appellate review only those remand orders based on the grounds specified in 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (2000): a defect in the removal procedure and a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins. Co. , 517 U.S. 706, 711-12 (1996) (instructing that § 1447(c) and (d) must be read in conjunction with one anot her). Thus, because the district court concluded it lacked subject matter jurisdiction under §§ 1441 and 1442, that portion of the remand order is not subject to appellate review. Severonickel v. Gaston Reymenants , 115 F.3d 265, 266-69 (4th Cir. 1997); Mangold v. Analytic Servs., Inc. , 77 F.3d 1442, 1450 (4th Cir. 1996); Noel v. McCain , 538 F.2d 633, 635 (4th Cir. 1976). Accordingly, to the- 3 - extent Muhammad challenges the district court’s jurisdictional determination under §§ 1441 and 1442, his appeal is dismissed. The district court’s conclusion that removal was also improper pursuant to § 1443 is reviewable, however. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d). After a thorough review of the record and the district court’s order, we find no reversible error; accordingly, we affirm this portion of the district court’s order on the reasoning of the district court. SeeAttorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Muhammad , No. 1:05-cv-03144-MJG (D. Md. Jan. 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART ; AFFIRMED IN PART
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors

LeCroy Corporation: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-163195, 333-155279, 333-139638, 333-129490,333-120656, 333-113271, 333-91833, and 333-03144) on Form S-8, (No. 333-139708) on Form S-3/A and (No. 333-176320) on Form S-3 of LeCroy Corporation of our report dated September 2, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofLeCroy Corporation and subsidiaries as of July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the 52 week period ended July 2, 2011, the 53 week periodended July 3, 2010 and the 52 week period ended June 27, 2009, and the related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the July 2, 2011 annual report on Form 10-K of the Company. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Short Hills, New Jersey

September 2, 2011