alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# I **OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **FE AWTIN**  **O-Cyuclc I--** 

Honorable George X. 3hrppard Coaptroller **OS Publlo**  **Aeoouata Auatln,**  Taxar
Dw Sir:

. In you3 letter 0 to UQtzo fallowing raotsa and certain attorney8 W&d8 oa DOoOmbOP 31

**oral sloation,**  **but** uaoosd himesS. It is proppro~al **0r** the oobtraot **by** he Lemooratlo party to moou rewostour oplnlon aa **p be**  properly and legally

by the aozalasioner vho ~111 not awoood hln~elt 10 not yet an oftioorand ~111 

### not be until ho ~ud.lfl.8 and **take8** OVOJP et th0 old of the **year.** Clo~ly h0 oannot nOoWOStGls! u-elf Qr 1Willy bind hfmaelt now by contraOt a8 to hie 

### fUtUr0Orriohl duties, It, artor ~ualfrlOatiOn, ho should 804 lsOOd

### Honorable Oeorga U, Sheppard, i?azeZ

reason8 for

## not making thir aontraot it would be hi.8duty to vote a@lnot it and 40s i20 Other EWbOr8 Of the OOC&8- 8iOntW9 Oourt the beAOiit ot such reasona,whloh 

### ml&it ro**sult** in a retieal to ontor into the oontraat. Ye

## must bo rree to aot

### urtsr he is indaoted into orfias. 'tie thOroioro answer your question in thenogotlvo. Se noto tho attaohed letter 0r 0~6 0r theattorneysm3ntlonlng the hiatus betweea the erplrotion 0r tho poaont aontraot and the 

### w60tiv0 dato 0r -a0 OAB to beaade next yoarb Under ourriow or tho questlon, tbore ~lllneoeasarlly bo a p6rlOd ot tizio during whioh no oatraot will b0 

### In OrrOOt but 

### feel that it aem ba held 

### to ii viry rew 

### &ys upon.xonipt sotlon or the aorunisrlonerrr* oourt, tliei.nterested~ottomeys, the COnptroll0r's and Attorney Geaaral~s Departrcents,



### Your letter lndloater that youwould like for us also to 8x 

### ress oureelvcls as to tho legality of suah ccntraoto mado **by** oo& ties Inwhioh allm6abor8 or the comulssionere~ oourt, lnoludingthe oounty judae, and zha county attorney have been re-slooted. ;.horo this lo truo, tho reasons whloh forbid themking or such oxtended.oontrootshave substantially 

### railed, and in such aas8e we will 8~pprwb.a0n'craOt8extending bsyond ths inouclbent

### oiflaers’ terma, if there are no other Objeotionn. On this pointwe oit8 Camsron vo* iarneot, 34 s. ii.(2) 685. It will be kept iD mind, hcwat:tW, that this cannot be done until re-elootion is had at the gemoral q&atlon la Ekma~ber.
,;. VI-,

.‘,

GaL:db APPROVECOCT 22, 1940

ATTORNEYGENFaRAL

OFTEXAS
#### LOUISIANA HIGHWAY HEAVY MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY BRANCH, Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. and R. W. Carter v. STATE of Louisiana Through DEPT. OF LABOR, Curtis C. Luttrell, Assistant Commissioner of Labor and the Dept. of Transportation and Development.

No. 62304.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: Louisiana Highway Heavy Municipal and Utility Branch, Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. and R. W. Carter, applying for writ of review. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Denied. Applicants have an adequate remedy by appeal.
Hibbing Taconite

 2010 performance testing o Line 1 – 56 .0 lb SO 2/hr o Line 2 – 63 .0 lb SO 2/hr o Line 3 – 64 .0 lb SO 2/hr o With all lines operating at their limits, total would be 183 lb/hr  Facility suggested following limits: o Line 1 – 720 lb SO 2/day [equivalent to 30 lb SO 2/hr] o Line 2 – 1912 lb SO 2/day [equivalent to 80 lb SO 2/hr] o Line 3 – 1032 lb SO 2/hr [equivalent to 43 lb SO 2/hr] o With all lines operating at their limits, total would be 153 lb SO 2 /hr  State set BART at 0.207lbs SO 2/LT for each line o State cites report with Hibbing production rate of 384 LT fired pellets /hr, so S tate’s limit would be equivalent to 80 lb SO 2/hr for each line o With all lines operating at their limits, total would be 240 lb SO 2 /hr  Propose following limits on a 30 day rolling average: o Line 1 – 56.0 lb SO 2/hr o Line 2 – 63.0 lb SO 2/hr o Line 3 – 64.0 lb SO 2/hr
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         262
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    19911
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20173
<PP&E>                                         42801
<DEPRECIATION>                                 19016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 317827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          164031
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       338
<OTHER-SE>                                     153458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   317827
<SALES>                                        284
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               284
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               16756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (16743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (16743)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (16774)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                                             [ARTHUR ANDERSEN LOGO APPEARS HERE]

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



      As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report on the 1998 and 1997 consolidated financial statements of Physician
Reliance Network, Inc. dated February 19, 1999, included in this Form 10-K and
to its incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-778, 333-782, 333-784, 333-786, 333-30057, 333-80977, 333-81069,
333-85859, 333-85853 and 333-85855) of US Oncology, Inc. It should be noted that
we have not audited any financial statements of Physician Reliance Network, Inc.
subsequent to December 31, 1998, or performed any audit procedures subsequent to
the date of our report.




                                        ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Dallas, Texas
  March 24, 2000
# Tree lighting ceremony kicks off DSCR holiday season

/ Published Dec. 13, 2018
Richmond, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Linda Hurry hosted the annual tree lighting ceremony in the Frank B. Lotts Conference Center on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, Dec. 4.

A full house greeted the Bensley Elementary School fifth grade chorus class who helped kick off the holiday season. Amy Clement, chief, DLA Aviation Public Affairs Office, served as emcee.

Dr. Patrice Wilson, school principal, thanked DLA staff for the opportunity to perform and for providing the children with guidance. “Our students are your future leaders,” she said. “Thank you for being role models.”

Hurry made remarks and recognized several staff members for length of service, including Phillip Mitchell for 46 years.  She also mentioned Lee Scott, engineering technician, DLA Installation Operations Richmond as one of DLA’s Top 10 Employees and Maurice Sanabria, supervisory management analyst, Command Support Directorate, DLA Aviation, who was recognized by DLA Headquarters for his work in equal employment opportunities.

“Now let’s get on to the fun,” she said as two BES children assisted her in flipping the switch to light the tree. 

Clement then introduced the chorus led by Victoria Shelton, music teacher.

Clement closed with an invitation for everyone to have refreshments provided by the Civilian Welfare Fund.
DSpace Repository

# Of Shoes and Ships and Sealing Wax: Sundries from Zinacantán

Login

      -  DSpace Home 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions Series 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology 
      - →
      - View Item

# Of Shoes and Ships and Sealing Wax: Sundries from Zinacantán

Laughlin, Robert M.

DOI:					https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.25.1

Date:					1980

### Abstract:					

### Citation:					

*Of Shoes and Ships and Sealing Wax: Sundries from Zinacantán**Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology*https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.25.1

Show full item record

## Files in this item

Name:SCtA-0025-Hi_res.pdf

Size:124.7Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0025-Lo_res.pdf

Size:9.600Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0025.epub

Size:9.213Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:ePub

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0025.mobi

Size:11.60Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:mobi

View/Open

## This item appears in the following Collection(s)

            -  Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology  [60]  

# Search DSpace

# Browse

              -  All of DSpace                  -  Communities & Collections 
                -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 
              -  This Collection                  -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 

# My Account

              -  Login 

Terms of UsePrivacyContact UsSend Feedback

DSpace softwareDuraSpace

Theme by
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Health  Partnership  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Doug Stukel , President,  Chief Executive Officer and acting principal financial
officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.




                                         /s/ Doug Stukel
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Doug Stukel, President, CEO

Dated: November 21, 2005
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to
the reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the
Prospectus and to the use of our report dated November 19, 2015, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-206744) of
Smart Trust, Sustainable Impact Investing Trust, Series 4.


 


	 	/s/ Grant
    Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


November 19, 2015
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 26, 2012

d1217 

# Order

December 26, 2012

144089(15)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144089

COA: 303355

Wayne CC: 06

- 005895

- FC

CHUCK WILLIAM BACON

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 25, 2012

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Dock Lee Minter, Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00160

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR17

- 128 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment by (1) replacing “Not True” with “Not Applicable” next to “Plea to Enhancement Paragraph(s)

, ” and (2) replacing “True” with “Not Applicable” next to “Findings on Enhancement Paragraph(s).” As modified, the judgment

of the trial court is affirmed. We note that the appellant, Dock Lee Minter, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 30, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTES T: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Diatom Corporation, a Nevada corporation
      (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006  as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, J. Dan
      Sifford former Sole Officer/Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my
      knowledge:






(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      May 15, 2006






/s/J.
      Dan Sifford


J.
      Dan
      Sifford


Sole
      Officer/Director
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3587-000]


The Toledo Edison Company; Notice of Filing

September 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 20, 1997, The Toledo Edison Company 
tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before September 12, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23930 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1944 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1944

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Cuprate(3-), [2-[[[[3-
    [[4-[[2-[2- (ethenylsulfonyl)ethoxy]ethyl]amino]-6-fluoro-1,3,5-
              triazin-2-yl]amino]-2-(hydroxy-.kappa.O)-5-
        sulfophenyl]azo-.kappa.N2]phenylmethyl]azo-.kappa.N1]-4-
                sulfobenzoato(5-)-.kappa.O], trisodium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 1, 2005

 Mrs. Lincoln introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 ToextendthetemporarysuspensionofdutyonCuprate(3-),[2-[[[[3-[[4-[[2-[2-
     (ethenylsulfonyl)ethoxy]ethyl]amino]-6-fluoro-1,3,5-triazin-2-
                   yl]amino]-2-(hydroxy-.kappa.O)-5-
        sulfophenyl]azo-.kappa.N2]phenylmethyl]azo-.kappa.N1]-4-
                 sulfobenzoato(5-)-.kappa.O],trisodium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CUPRATE(3-), [2-[[[[3-[[4-[[2-[2- 
              (ETHENYLSULFONYL)ETHOXY]ETHYL]AMINO]-6-FLUORO-1,3,5-
              TRIAZIN-2-YL]AMINO]-2-(HYDROXY-.KAPPA.O)-5-
              SULFOPHENYL]AZO-.KAPPA.N2]PHENYLMETHYL]AZO-.KAPPA.N1]-4-
              SULFOBENZOATO(5-)-.KAPPA.O], TRISODIUM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.47 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40942

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RICARDO GUADALUPE MONTOYA-OLACHIA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:13-CR-677

Before DAVIS, DENNIS and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ricardo Guadalupe 

Montoya-Olachia has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Montoya-Olachia has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 28, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40942 Document: 00512577339 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2014
No. 13-40942

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40942 Document: 00512577339 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/28/2014
# DLA Distribution Pearl Harbor Stock Readiness Team wins Big Ideas Award

/ Published June 21, 2017
PEARL HARBOR, Hawaii, The DLA Distribution Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, Stock Readiness Team is the winner of the DLA Distribution Big Ideas Awards for the 2nd Quarter Fiscal Year 2017 in the Small Category.  The 5-member team, which includes Alda Galera, Leonilo Fabro, Joseph Mendiola, Jerome Mcdaniel and David Woods, led DLA Distribution Pearl Harbor efforts in the divestiture of stagnant Navy-owned materiel, effectively returning nearly $180,000 to Navy stock.  The team also responded to DLA’s Suspect Counterfeit Material tasker by completing almost 450 Safety of Flight special inspections in three days, eliminating the possibility of the issuance of counterfeit material two days ahead of the suspense.
#### BRUSH v.WILSON.

No. 39123.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 226 So.2d 716.
256 La. 255

#### Succession of Stephen J. SLAVICH, Sr.

No. 50575.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Vernon G. Slavich applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 232 So.2d 846.

Writ refused. There is no error of law in the judgment.
#### Huey BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2475.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 13, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6306

CHARLES R. THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EARL BESHEARS, Warden; EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-324-WMN) Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Charles R. Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Severn Eyre Savage Miller, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* For the purposes of this appeal we assume that the date Appellant wrote on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it would have been submitted to prison authorities. See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988). 2 PER CURIAM:Charles Thomas filed an untimely notice of appeal and an untimely motion to extend time to file a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal upon a party’s timely Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) motion to extend or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on August 26, 1998; Thomas’s notice of appeal and motion to extend time to file a notice of appeal were filed on February 25, 1999. Thomas’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal * or a timely motion to extend the time to file a notice of appeal, or to obtain a reopening of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of his appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We3 dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Johnny M. ROSS

No. 62302.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: Johnny M. Ross, applying for supervisory writs. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.