alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**I, Paul S. Feeley, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Central Bancorp, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.February14, 2007           /s/ Paul S. Feeley   Paul S. Feeley    Senior Vice President, TreasurerandChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.12


 


Freddie Mac Loan Number 708556663

Century Palms at World Gateway


 


MMP
AND O&M PROGRAMS Implementation Certificate


 


		Date:	August 20, 2015



 


		Property:	Century Palms at World Gateway

9000 Avenue Pointe Circle

Orlando, Florida 32821



 


The Borrower has accepted and implemented
the Moisture Management Plan for the Property.


 


The Borrower has accepted and implemented
the following, as an O&M Program for the Property:


 


Asbestos Operations and Maintenance
Plan dated as of July 7, 2015, prepared by Real Estate Advisory LLC.


 


[End
of Page - Signature Page to Follow]


 




    	MMP and O&M Programs Implementation Certificate
	Page 1



     


    

  


	 	BR CARROLL WORLD GATEWAY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Jordan Ruddy
	 	 	Jordan Ruddy
	 	 	Chief Executive Officer


 




    	MMP and O&M Programs Implementation Certificate
	Page 2
254 La. 1098

#### Ruthie Mae SMITH v. SCOTLAND URBAN ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. 50250.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 18, 1969.

In re: Ruthie Mae Smith applying for writs of certiorari and review.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Wayne D. JOINER, Sr.

No. 61888.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 23, 1978.

In re: Wayne D. Joiner, Sr., applying for supervisory or remedial writs. Rapides Parish.

Writ granted. Bond reduced to $10,000.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., dissent.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ralph MORGAN.

No. 60950.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 15, 1978.

Robert J. Zibilich, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24368]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-43-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

September 9, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 3, 1997, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, Twenty Second Revised Sheet No. 6A. The proposed 
effective date of this tariff sheet is October 1, 1997.
    WNG states that pursuant to Article 26 of the General Terms and 
Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff, and FERC Annual Charges Billing 
under 18 CFR Part 382, dated August 1, 1997, WNG is filing to reflect 
an increase in the FERC Annual Charge Adjustment from $.0020 to $.0022 
per Dth for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1997. The unit charge 
factor of $.0020 per Dth, approved by the Commission, is adjusted by 
the debit amount related to the previous fiscal year to arrive at a 
total ACA unit charge factor of $.0022.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all 
jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24368 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 4:05-cv-01349-JEJ-JVW Document 11 Filed 12/20/05 Page 1 of 4
Case 4:05-cv-01349-JEJ-JVW Document 11 Filed 12/20/05 Page 2 of 4
Case 4:05-cv-01349-JEJ-JVW Document 11 Filed 12/20/05 Page 3 of 4
Case 4:05-cv-01349-JEJ-JVW Document 11 Filed 12/20/05 Page 4 of 4
# L_2013184EN.01000501.xml

| 3.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 184/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 184/5

---

DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

of 1 July 2013

appointing a Judge to the General Court

(2013/348/EU)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 19 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 254 and 255 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a(1) thereof,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of Croatia, and in particular Article 22(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 22(1) of the Act of Accession of Croatia provides for the appointment of a Croatian judge to the General Court for the period from 1 July 2013 to 31 August 2013. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 22(1) of the Act of Accession of Croatia provides for the appointment of a Croatian judge to the General Court for the period from 1 July 2013 to 31 August 2013.

| (2) | Ms Vesna TOMLJENOVIĆ has been proposed as a candidate for appointment as a judge of the General Court. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Ms Vesna TOMLJENOVIĆ has been proposed as a candidate for appointment as a judge of the General Court.

| (3) | The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on the suitability of Ms Vesna TOMLJENOVIĆ to perform the duties of Judge of the General Court, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on the suitability of Ms Vesna TOMLJENOVIĆ to perform the duties of Judge of the General Court,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Vesna TOMLJENOVIĆ is hereby appointed a judge of the General Court for the period from 1 July 2013 to 31 August 2013.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 July 2013.

Done at Brussels, 1 July 2013.

For the Council

The President

L. LINKEVIČIUS

---
CERTIFICATIONS Pursuant to Section 302
  I, Dan Sifford, certify that:
  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GYK Ventures, Inc. ;
  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
  4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
  5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
  6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
    /s/J. Dan Sifford
 J. Dan Sifford
 sole officer/director
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of International Commercial Television
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  Kelvin Claney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and  Karl Redekopp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:

1.   the  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.   the  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

            Date: May 15, 2006

                                    Signed:  /s/  Kelvin Claney
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                    Signed:  /s/Karl Redekopp
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Chief Financial Officer
```
[Federal Register: March 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 52)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 13009-13011]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18mr10-17]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

49 CFR Part 40

[Docket DOT-OST-2008-0088]
RIN OST 2105-AD84

 
Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing 
Programs

Correction

    In rule document 2010-3731 beginning on page 8528 in the issue of 
Thursday, February 25, 2010, make the following corrections:

Sec. 40.225  [Corrected]

    1. On page 8529, in Sec. 40.225, in the first column, amendatory 
instructions 2 and 3 are corrected to read as follows:

0
2. Section 40.225 (a) is amended by removing the words ``beginning 
February 1, 2002''.
0
3. Appendix G is revised to read as follows:

Appendix G to Part 40  [Corrected]

    2. On page 8530 and 8531, in Appendix G to Part 40, the graphics 
are reprinted to read as follows:

[[Page 13010]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25FE10.001

[[Page 13011]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25FE10.002

[FR Doc. C1-2010-3731 Filed 3-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301-00-D
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2035 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2035

To extend the time required for construction of a hydroelectric project 
             in the State of Idaho, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2005

 Mr. Craig (for himself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the time required for construction of a hydroelectric project 
             in the State of Idaho, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ARROWROCK HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 4656, on request 
of the licensee, the Commission shall--
            (1) if the license for the project is in effect on the date 
        of enactment of this Act, extend the period for commencing 
        construction of project works for a period of 3 years beginning 
        on the date of enactment of this Act; or
            (2) if the license for the project expired before the date 
        of enactment of this Act, reinstate and extend the period for 
        commencing construction of project works for an additional 3-
        year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ronald S. WOODWARD, Petitioner, v. Warren H. EDWARDS, Judge, Criminal Court of Record, Division “A”, Orange County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 40782.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 9, 1971.

Louis R. Bowen, Public Defender, and Edward G. Helvenston, Asst. Public Defender, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, reported at 244 So. 2d 438, has been certified by that court for review by certiorari, under Fla.Const. Article V, § 4(2), F.S.A. Oral argument has been dispensed with. Wé have considered the record and briefs of counsel and conclude that the decision of the District Court is correct, and we adopt it as the decision of this Court. See also, Bates v. Amidon, 249 So.2d 1, Sup.Ct. opinion filed this date.

This certiorari proceeding was filed pursuant to Rule 4.5(c) (6), F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., which provides, in part:

> * * * unless the district court shall otherwise direct for good cause shown after notice and hearing, a petition for certiorari filed in the Supreme Court within 15 days from the date of the filing of the order, decision or judgment sought to be reviewed or within 15 days from the date of the disposition of a petition for rehearing shall automatically stay further proceedings in the district court and the trial court until the disposition of said petition by the Supreme Court * * * ”

The decision herein reviewed was rendered on December 11, 1970, and a timely petition for rehearing was denied on January 29, 1971. The petition for writ of certiorari was filed on February 11, 1971, thereby continuing the stay of proceedings in this cause.

Accordingly, the Writ is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105·3901 

OFFICE OF THE 

REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR 

OCT 1 4 2009 

The Honorable William Rhodes 

Gila River Indian Community 

P.O. Box 97 

Sacaton, Arizona 85247 

Dear Governor Rhodes: 

In December 2008, then EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson sent a letter 

informing you of the designations for the 2006 24-hour national ambient air quality 

standards (NAAQS) for fine particles (PM2S). Your reservation was located in an area 

that was designated as attainment/unclassifiable for that standard. Those designation 

decisions were based on the 2005-2007 air quality monitoring data, which were the most 

current data at that time. 

However, these designations were never finalized because they were not 

published in the Federal Register. Current EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson has reviewed 

the December 2008 decisions and has decided to promulgate area designations based on 

consideration of new 2006-2008 air quality monitoring data, the most recent data 

available. I am writing to inform you that, based on consideration of 2006-2008 air 

quality monitoring data, one additional area in Arizona, Pinal County, appears to be 

violating the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. 

Because your reservation is located both within the boundaries of Pinal County 

and in an adjacent county with emissions that could potentially contribute to violations in 

Pinal County, EPA is reviewing our initial recommendation for your reservation. EPA is 

deferring the area designation for Pinal County and the surrounding ring of counties so 

that EPA and the tribes may collect sufficient infonnation to assess these areas before 

promulgating designations. As a first step in this process, EPA will gather and evaluate 

information. Once an evaluation is completed, we will notify you of our intended 

designation for your reservation. 

We plan to announce intended designations within the next several months and at
 

least 120 days prior to promulgating final designations. You will have an opportunity to
 

comment on EPA's intended designation once it is announced.
 

Printed on Recycled Paper 
We look forward to continuing to work with you and your staff to develop 

designations for the 24-hour PM2.

s NAAQS in a timely manner. If you have any 

questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Your air quality staff may wish to contact 

Colleen McKaughan, Associate Air Division Director at (520) 498-0118. 

Sincerely, 

Laura Yosnli 

Acting Regional Administrator 

cc: Margaret Cook, Director, DEQ 

2
Opinion issued April 13, 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 22
- 00 945
- CV

——————————— VANESHA TRUESDALE , Appella nt

V. DAVID TRUESDALE AND US LEGAL SUPPORT, INC. , Appell e e s

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 20 19
- 66331A

MEMORANDU M OPINION Appellant, Vanesha Truesdale, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. More than ten days have elapsed since the filing of the motion, and no party has objected
to dismissal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 10.3(a). No opinion has issued in this appeal.2

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a) (1). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Kelly and Goodman

.
#### Mrs. Henry M. BRANCH v. HEROLD *&*MILLER, INC. et al.

No. 45506.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 17, 1969.

Pyles & Tucker, Jackson, for appellant.

Adams, Forman, Truly, Ward, Smith & Bramlette, Natchez, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants




The Source Information Management Company
St. Louis, Missouri

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-16039) of The Source Information  Management Company
(the Company) of our report dated March 27, 1998,  relating to the  consolidated
financial  statements of the Company appearing in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB as of and for the year ended January 31, 1998.



                                             /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
April 30, 1998
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: ...certified organic production survey.**
 
PDF | txt | zip
 
SuDoc Number:A 92.2:OR 3/
Item Number:0122-A-07 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001018624
 
July 16, 2018