alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2132 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2132

 To include Idaho and Montana as affected areas for purposes of making 
 claims under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 
        note) based on exposure to atmospheric nuclear testing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 16, 2005

    Mr. Crapo (for himself, Mr. Burns, and Mr. Craig) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To include Idaho and Montana as affected areas for purposes of making 
 claims under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 
        note) based on exposure to atmospheric nuclear testing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF IDAHO AND MONTANA IN RADIATION EXPOSURE 
              COMPENSATION.

    Section 4(b)(1) of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 
U.S.C. 2210 note) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon; and
            (3) by adding after subparagraph (C) the following:
                    ``(D) the State of Idaho; and
                    ``(E) the State of Montana; and''.
                                 <all>
```
ike

ceN\ISO 

Scc- 0001,0 GSIOSIX 

CBIC Control Number 

361569 

RECEIVED 

OPPT CBIC 

20Iti AUG 26 All II: I 

p. 1 

DyStar® Lv 

209 Watlington Industrial Drive 

Reidsville NC 27320 USA 

Tel: 336-342-6631/ 800-443-8814 

Fax: 336-634-3324 

Date: August 19, 2014 

Document Control Officer 

7407M 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (MC 7405M) 

Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

RE: TSCA Section 4 — Test Rule Exemption Application 

CFR 40.799.5089 (Docket # EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112) 

Dear Sir/Madame: 

Scanned & Processed in 

CIS by: SHARON 

This letter is to request exemption from testing requirements for the substance listed 

below as required under Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112 and in compliance with 

40 CFR 790.80 and CFR 790.82. 

Identification of test rule: 40 CFR 799.5089 Chemical testing requirements for third 

group of high production volume chemicals (HPV3) 

Name, address, and telephone number for firm sponsoring DyStar: 

Sandy S. Carter 

DyStar LP 

209 Watlington Industrial Dr. 

Reidsville, NC 27320 

336-342-6631 ext 398 

Email: cartersandy©dystarcom 

Substance for testing CAS number: 127-68-4 (Benzenesulfonic acid, 3-nitro-, 

sodium salt) 

Test requirements by 40 CFR 799.5089: 

Vapor pressure: ASTM E 1782-08 (thermal analysis) [test A3 on Table 3 

of the rule] and; 

Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test at 40 CFR 

799.9355 [test F2 on Table 3 of the rule] 
Basis for Exemption: 

Test required by the test rule were completed by Tiarco Chemical located in 

Greenville, South Carolina and submitted July 8, 2013. 

DyStar understands that Tiarco Chemical has already completed the required testing 

and had submitted the study reports to the US EPA. 

§ 790.99 Statement of financial responsibility: 

DyStar LP understands that if this application is granted before the 

reimbursement period described in section 4(c)(3)(B) of TSCA expires, I must pay fair 

and equitable reimbursement to the person or persons who incurred or shared in the 

costs of complying with the requirement to submit data and upon whose data the 

granting of my application was based. 

This material is not manufactured by DyStar nor is it used in any production 

processing. It is re-packed only (from bags to drums) as a sourced product. Projected 

amount to be re-packed is not expected to exceed 25,000 lbs per year. 

Please contact me if you should have any questions. 

Regards, 

Sandy S. Carter 

DyStar LP 

209 Watlington Industrial Dr. 

Reidsville, NC 27320 

336-342-6631 ext 398 

p. 2
Skip to main content

## FNS - Help

                  - About Us
                  - Ask the Expert
                  - Contact Us
                  - En Español

There is no translation for this content.

          - Home
          - Recipes             - Household
            - Large Quantity
            - Submit a Recipe
          - My Tools             - My Cookbook
            - Shopping List
          - USDA Foods Fact Sheets
          - Log In / Register

Household Recipes

Large Quantity Recipes

Recetas en Español

                          -            Click here for more information        
                          -            Start Simple with MyPlate              Get tips, ideas and a personalized plan to meet your food group targets!    
                          -            September 2019 Recipe of the Month              Get a new recipe each month! Click the red envelope below to sign up.    
                          -            Fruit Pizza              The crust for this dessert cooks in the oven and is covered with a cream cheese mix and topped with strawberries. For variety, try using any combination of colorful fruits.    
                          -            Chilled Blueberry Soup              This refreshing and beautiful quick, summer soup features a blend of blueberries, apple juice, and low-fat yogurt.    
                          -            Corn, Zucchini and Tomato Pie              Colorful and hearty, this savory pie is a great way to showcase summer vegetables. Serve it as a side dish or a meatless entrée.    

## Search Recipes

### Stay Connected
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2054 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2054

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of water 
                   resources in the State of Vermont.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VERMONT WATER RESOURCES STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 
Director of the United States Geological Survey and in coordination 
with the State of Vermont, shall, in accordance with this Act and any 
other applicable law, conduct a study of water resources in the State 
of Vermont, including--
            (1) a survey of--
                    (A) with respect to groundwater--
                            (i) supplies, including aquifers, that are 
                        available for potable use by municipalities in 
                        the State; and
                            (ii) availability, potability, potential to 
                        recharge, and interaction with surface water; 
                        and
                    (B) potential future water supply sources; and
            (2) a characterization of surface and bedrock geology, 
        including the effect of that geology on groundwater yield and 
        quality.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Energy and 
Natural Resources of the Senate and the Committee on Resources of the 
House of Representatives a report describing the results of the study.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this section.

SEC. 2. OFFSET.

    Section 201(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4090) is amended in the undesignated 
paragraph under the heading ``norfolk harbor and channels, virginia'' 
by striking ``$551,000,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of 
$256,000,000'' and inserting ``$545,000,000, with an estimated first 
Federal cost of $250,000,000''.

            Passed the Senate December 7, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2054

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of water 
                   resources in the State of Vermont.
```
No. 00-7266.

#### Lindner *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1959 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1959

To direct the Architect of the Capitol to obtain a statue of Rosa Parks 
   and to place the statue in the United States Capitol in National 
                             Statuary Hall.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 3, 2005

    Mr. Kerry (for himself, Mr. Obama, Mr. Levin, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. 
  Kennedy, Mr. Corzine, and Mr. Smith) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Architect of the Capitol to obtain a statue of Rosa Parks 
   and to place the statue in the United States Capitol in National 
                             Statuary Hall.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLACEMENT OF STATUE OF ROSA PARKS IN NATIONAL STATUARY HALL.

    (a) Obtaining Statue.--The Architect of the Capitol shall enter 
into an agreement to obtain a statue of Rosa Parks, under such terms 
and conditions as the Architect considers appropriate and consistent 
with applicable law.
    (b) Placement.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Architect shall place the statue obtained under 
subsection (a) in the United States Capitol in a suitable permanent 
location in National Statuary Hall.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act, and any amounts so appropriated shall 
remain available until expended.
                                 <all>
```
II 

Calendar No. 333 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2036 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

320 High Street in Clinton, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Raymond J. Salmon 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2005 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself and Mr. KERRY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

DECEMBER 16, 2005 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 320 High Street in Clinton, Massachusetts, 

as the ‘‘Raymond J. Salmon Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RAYMOND J. SALMON POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 320 High Street in Clinton, Mas-
2 

•S 2036 RS 

1 sachusetts, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ray2 mond J. Salmon Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Raymond J. Salmon 

7 Post Office’’. 

Calendar No. 333 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2036 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice’’. Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Raymond J. Salmon Post al Service located at 320 High Street in Clinton, 

DECEMBER 16, 2005 

Reported without amendment
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Trump
Entertainment Resorts, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Juliano, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 19, 2010



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/ Mark Juliano                 
|Mark Juliano                     
|Chief Executive Officer          
|Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc.
# L_2009322EN.01003901.xml

| 9.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 322/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 322/39

---

DECISION TAKEN BY COMMON AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF MEMBER STATES

of 7 December 2009

on the location of the seat of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators

(2009/913/EU)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES,

Having regard to Article 341 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union,

Whereas:

| (1) | The establishment of an Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators was decided by Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing an Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (1) |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The establishment of an Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators was decided by Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 establishing an Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (1)

| (2) | The location of the seat of this Agency should be determined, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The location of the seat of this Agency should be determined,

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators shall have its seat in Ljubljana.

Article 2

This Decision, which will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union, shall take effect on the date of its publication.

Done at Brussels, 7 December 2009.

For the Council

The President

M. OLOFSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 211, 14.8.2009, p. 1.

1

---
#### Dwight HATFIELD, Appellant, v. Michael J. YORK, Appellee.

No. 76-2127.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 24, 1978.

*427Robert V. Romani of Farish & Farish, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Maureen McGill and Monroe A. Coogler, Jr., of Adams, Sullivan, Coogler & Watson, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

ALDERMAN, Chief Judge.

In a three-count amended counterclaim appellant seeks damages for assault and battery, false arrest and malicious prosecution. The trial court dismissed with prejudice all three counts because appellant alleged that he pled guilty to assault and battery, resisting arrest without violence and indecent exposure, the same criminal charges which he alleged were maliciously instituted by the appellee. He attempts to avoid the effect of his previous pleas of guilty by alleging that the pleas were procured through fraud, perjury or other corrupt means, contending that the finder of fact should be allowed to weigh the guilty pleas as evidence in the case.

In civil actions where one of the issues is the guilt of a person convicted of a criminal offense, or some fact necessarily involved in the determination of such guilt, it is proper to admit evidence of that person’s plea of guilty to the criminal offense. The guilty plea is admissible as a declaration against interest and may be considered by the finder of fact, but it does not as a matter of law establish the truth of the facts upon which the judgment of guilt was rendered. *Boshnack v. World Wide Rent-A-Car, Inc.,*195 So.2d 216 (Fla.1967).

In the present case, counts one and two allege causes of action which are not vitiated by appellant’s admission that he pled guilty to certain criminal charges arising out of the same incident. In spite of appellant’s guilty pleas, he may still be able to present evidence from which a jury could find that he was the victim of an assault and battery and a false arrest.

A different situation exists, however, as to count three. An essential element of malicious prosecution is a bona fide termination of the original criminal charges in favor of the claimant. The original criminal charges in this case obviously were not terminated in appellant’s favor because he pled guilty. The deficiency is not cured by the allegation that these pleas were procured through fraud, perjury or other corrupt means.

We hold that the trial court erred in dismissing counts one and two for assault and battery and false arrest, but correctly dismissed count three for malicious prosecution.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

DREW, E. HARRIS (Retired), and STET-TIN, HERBERT, Associate Judges, concur.
#### G. R. CHURCHILL, Petitioner, v. Louis LEOPOLD, Respondent.

No. 40511.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 25, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 235 So.2d 737.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Order entered December 6, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01456-CV

IN RE MICHAEL A. RUFF, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-11-02825-1

ORDER

Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Schenck

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs, if any, of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Case 4:08-cv-00761-JEJ Document 89 Filed 03/10/10 Page 1 of 5
Case 4:08-cv-00761-JEJ Document 89 Filed 03/10/10 Page 2 of 5
Case 4:08-cv-00761-JEJ Document 89 Filed 03/10/10 Page 3 of 5
Case 4:08-cv-00761-JEJ Document 89 Filed 03/10/10 Page 4 of 5
Case 4:08-cv-00761-JEJ Document 89 Filed 03/10/10 Page 5 of 5
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6376

HARRY THOMAS NETHKEN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BOB BELL, Monongalia County Commission

President; ANSEL KENNEDY, Monongalia County

Commissioner; JOHN PYLES, Monongalia County

Commissioner, JOE BARTOLO, Monongalia County

Sheriff; AL KISNER, Chief Deputy; TODD FORBES,

Deputy,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief

District Judge. (CA-01-125)

Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 6, 2002

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry Thomas Nethken, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Harry Thomas Nethken, Jr., appeals the recommendation of the

magistrate judge dismissing certain parties and claims in this

§ 1983 action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292

(1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 10.50**

**NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION**

Our non-employee directors received an annual retainer of$150,000, 10,000 shares of restricted stock and reasonable and accountable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending Board and committee meetings. Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc.’s Board of Directors has established apolicy that non-employee directors will receive an additional 5,000 shares of restricted stock each May 1st beginning in 2006. In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional $50,000 and the Chairman of each of theCorporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Compensation Committee receives an additional $25,000 per year. Each member of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee, other than their respective Chairmen, receive an additional $5,000per year. Our Presiding Director is paid an additional $35,000 annually.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of ROO  Group,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert Petty,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

November 18, 2005                            /s/ Robert Petty
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Robert Petty
                                            Chief Executive Officer