alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 177 (Friday, September 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24204]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 090597C]


Western Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
hold a meeting of its Bottomfish Task Force.

DATES: The meeting will be held on October 2, 1997, from 9:00 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Council office, Conference 
Room, 1164 Bishop Street, Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI; telephone: (808) 
522-8220.
    Council address: Western Pacific Fishery Management Council, 1164 
Bishop St., Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI 96813.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kitty M. Simonds, Executive Director; 
telephone: (808) 522-8220.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Bottomfish Task Force will review a 
draft amendment for the Mau Zone bottomfish fishery limited entry 
program in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. The Task Force will also 
discuss new entry criteria for the limited entry program and consider 
other business as needed.
    Although other issues not contained in this agenda may come before 
this Task Force for discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act, those issues may not be the 
subject of formal Task Force action during this meeting. Task Force 
action will be restricted to those issues specifically identified in 
the agenda listed in this notice.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Kitty M. Simonds, 808-522-8220 (voice) or 808-
522-8226 (fax), at least 5 days prior to meeting date.

    Dated: September 5, 1997.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-24204 Filed 9-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
#### Charles W. JACOBS, Jr., Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Appellee.

No. 70-91.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 14, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1617 

To suspend temporarily the duty on gemifloxacin, gemifloxacin mesylate, 

and gemifloxacin mesylate sesquihydrate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself and Mr. KERRY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on gemifloxacin, 

gemifloxacin mesylate, and gemifloxacin mesylate 

sesquihydrate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GEMIFLOXACIN, GEMIFLOXACIN MESYLATE, 

4 AND GEMIFLOXACIN MESYLATE 

5 SESQUIHYDRATE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 
2 

•S 1617 IS

‘‘ 9902.05.68 Gemifloxacin (CAS No. 

175463–14–6); gemifloxacin 

mesylate (CAS No. 210353– 

53–0); gemifloxacin mesylate 

sesquihydrate (CAS No. 

210353–56–3 ) (the foregoing provided for in subheading 2933.99.46) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

3 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or with4 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

5 January 1, 2005. 

6 (2) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—Notwith7 standing section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

8 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, upon 

9 proper request filed with U.S. Customs and Border 

10 Protection before the 90th day after the date of the 

11 enactment of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal 

12 from warehouse for consumption, of any good— 

13 (A) that was made on or after January 1, 

14 2005, and before the date of the enactment of 

15 this Act, and 

16 (B) with respect to which there would have 

17 been no duty if the amendment made by sub18 section (a) applied to such entry or withdrawal, 

19 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such amend20 ment applied to such entry or withdrawal. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1829 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1829

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 1936, pertaining to 
                          the Virgin Islands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN LAWS PERTAINING TO THE VIRGIN ISLANDS.

    (a) Repeal.--Sections 1 through 6 of the Act of May 26, 1936 (48 
U.S.C. 1401 et seq.), are repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section takes 
effect on July 22, 1954.

            Passed the Senate September 29, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1829

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 1936, pertaining to 
                          the Virgin Islands.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1816 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1816

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the manufacturing 
   deduction provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 with 
  respect to income attributable to domestic production activities in 
                              Puerto Rico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 4, 2005

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the manufacturing 
   deduction provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 with 
  respect to income attributable to domestic production activities in 
                              Puerto Rico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEDUCTION ALLOWABLE WITH RESPECT TO INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO 
              DOMESTIC PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES IN PUERTO RICO.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (d) of section 199 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to definitions and special rules) is 
amended by redesignating paragraph (7) as paragraph (8) and by 
inserting after paragraph (6) the following new paragraph:
            ``(7) Treatment of activities in puerto rico.--In the case 
        of any taxpayer with gross receipts for any taxable year from 
        sources within the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, if all of such 
        receipts are taxable under section 1 or 11 for such taxable 
        year, then for purposes of determining the domestic production 
        gross receipts of such taxpayer for such taxable year under 
        subsection (c)(4), the term `United States' shall include the 
        Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
#### Joseph Louis SCARPATI, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-1001.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 17, 1969.

Rehearing Denied July 23, 1969.

*336Leonard Moriber and Alan B. Brody, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks review of a jury verdict, judgment of conviction, and sentence thereon following an information charging him with robbery. He urges that the trial court erred in: (1) failing to grant a continuance made on the morning of the trial, (2) alleged improper comment by the prosecution in opening statement relative to a similar crime pattern, (3) failure to suppress certain evidence obtained at the time of the arrest, (4) failure of the trial court to strike certain unsolicited testimony given by a witness, (5) failure to grant a mistrial because of alleged inflammatory statements in closing argument, (6) that the trial court erred in its charge to the jury, (7) that the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant when it was alleged he was incompetent, and (8) that the trial court erred in failing to grant a motion for acquittal.

Following a review of this record which indicates that, after the State had completed its case, the defense moved for a directed verdict and after it was denied elected not to put on any evidence and submitted the cause to the jury. Following instructions, the jury retired and then returned to the courtroom to have certain evidence reviewed for them. We find no error in the trial proceedings and that the defendant was accorded a fair if not a perfect trial. Simpson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 862; Zide v. State, Fla.App.1968, 212 So.2d 788; Lutwak v. United States, 344 U.S. 604, 73 S.Ct. 481, 97 L.Ed. 593.

The points raised by the appellant are inadequate for several reasons: either they were not preserved in the trial court by a proper objection or request to the trial judge, or the alleged errors in fact do not constitute an error or, at best, they would be merely harmless error under the following authorities: Albright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 65; Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654; Wells v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 203 So.2d 199; Green v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 607; Bega v. State, Fla.App.1958, 100 So.2d 455; Kearson v. State, 123 Fla. 324, 166 So. 832; Kersey v. State, 73 Fla. 832, 74 So. 983; Ward v. State, 75 Fla. 756, 79 So. 699; Morris v. State, 100 Fla. 850, 130 So. 582; § 924.33, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Brown v. State, Fla.1968, 206 So.2d 377; § 918.-10(3), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Rule 6.16(a), Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.; Rule 1.740 (a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S.A.; Weinshenker v. State, Fla.App.1969, 223 So.2d 561 (opinion filed February 25, 1969).

Affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NATHANIEL JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

KELLY, Corrections Officer, Sergeant; et

al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

 and

JOYCE and MITEALL,

Defendants.

No. 15-15890

D.C. No. 

2:11-cv-01858-JAD-VCF

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 27, 2016** 

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

FILED

OCT 05 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Nathaniel Johnson appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force and due process claims. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Jones v. Williams, 791

F.3d 1023, 1030 (9th Cir. 2015). We vacate and remand. 

In granting summary judgment on Johnson’s excessive force claim, the

district court did not have the benefit of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in

Kingsley v. Hendrickson, 135 S. Ct. 2466 (2015) which held that the appropriate

standard for evaluating an excessive force claim involving a pretrial detainee is

objective unreasonableness. Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s summary

judgment of Johnson’s excessive force claim and remand for further proceedings. 

We do not consider Johnson’s due process claim because Johnson does not

raise this claim on appeal. 

All pending requests are denied.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.

2 15-15890
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 177 (Friday, September 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24224]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy


State Energy Advisory Board

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463; 86 Stat. 770), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting: State Energy Advisory Board.
    Date and Time: October 9, 1997 from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm, and October 
10, 1997 from 9:00 am to 3:00 pm.
    Place: The Radisson-Barcelo Hotel, 2121 P Street NW, Washington, DC 
20037. 202-293-3100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William J. Raup, Office of Building 
Technology, State, and Community Programs, Energy Efficiency and 
Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585, 
Telephone 202/586-2214.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose of the Board

    To make recommendations to the Assistant Secretary for Energy 
Efficiency and Renewable Energy regarding goals and objectives and 
programmatic and administrative policies, and to otherwise carry out 
the Board's responsibilities as designated in the State Energy 
Efficiency Programs Improvement Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-440).

Tentative Agenda

    Briefings on, and discussions of:
    <bullet> The FY1998 Federal budget figures for Energy Efficiency 
and Renewable Energy programs.
    <bullet> Issues related to Electric Utility Industry restructuring 
and potential Federal legislation in this area.
    <bullet> Review of priorities of the new Secretary and Assistant 
Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.

Public Participation

    The meeting is open to the public. Written statements may be filed 
with the Board either before or after the meeting. Members of the 
public who wish to make oral statements pertaining to agenda items 
should contact William J. Raup at the address or telephone number 
listed above. Requests to make oral presentations must be received five 
days prior to the meeting; reasonable provision will be made to include 
the statements in the agenda. The Chair of the Board is empowered to 
conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly 
conduct of business.

Minutes

    The minutes of the meeting will be available for public review and 
copying within 30 days at the Freedom of Information Public Reading 
Room, 1E-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on September 9, 1997.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-24224 Filed 9-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                               [GRAPHIC OMITTED]


                          CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION

                               PRINCIPAL REGISTER

     The Mark shown in this certificate has been registered in the United States
Patent and Trademark Office to the named registrant.

     The records of the United States Patent and Trademark Office show that an
application for registration of the Mark shown in this Certificate was filed in
the Office; that the application was examined and edtermined to be in compliance
with the requirements of the law and with the regulations prescribed by the
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office; and that the
Applicant is entitled to registration of the Mark under the Trademark Act of
1946, as Amended.

     A copy of the Mark and pertinent data from the application are part of this
certificate.

     This registration shall remain in force for TEN (10) years, unless
terminated earlier as provided by law, and subject to compliance with the
provisions of Section 8 of the Trademark Act of 1946, as Amended.


                                        /s/ Nicholas P. Godici

                                        Acting Director of the United States
                                        Patent and Trademark Office



[SEAL OF THE UNITED STATES
PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE]

<PAGE>


Int. Cl.: 41
Prior U.S. Cls.: 100, 101 and 107
                                                              Reg. No. 2,506,692
United States Patent and Trademark Office               Registered Nov. 13, 2001
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                  SERVICE MARK
                               PRINCIPAL REGISTER

                          BODYGUARD RECORDS.COM, INC.


BODYGUARD RECORDS.COM, INC. (DELA-             NO CLIAM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE
  WARE CORPORATION)                            RIGHT TO USE "RECORDS.COM, INC.",
5 GLENFIELD ROAD                               APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN.
GLEN RIDGE, NJ 07028

   FOR:  ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY
RECORD PRODUCTION, IN CLASS 41 (U.S. CLS.      SER. NO. 76-187,478,
100, 101 AND 107).                             FILED 12-29-2000

FIRST USE 12-1-1999; IN COMMERCE 12-1-1999     GEORGIA CARTY, EXAMINING ATTORNEY
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23289]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Amended Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the July 28, 1997 National 
Institute of Nursing Research Special Emphasis Panel meeting, Review of 
Individual National Research Service Award Applications (Telephone 
Conference Call), which was published in the Federal Register on July 
14, 1997 (62 FR 37586).
    This meeting will now be held on September 22, 1997, with the 
following changes:

    Time: 1:30 p.m.
    Place: II Rockledge Building, Room 7186, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
    Contact Person: Anne P. Clark, Ph.D., II Rockledge Drive, Room 
7186, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-0280.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.

    Dated: August 26, 1997.
LaVeen M. Ponds,
Policy Analyst, NIH CMO.
[FR Doc. 97-23289 Filed 9-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Brown Lee BRUCE, III, and Ricky Lamar Bruce v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49983.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 23, 1977.

Hugh L. Bailey, Winona, for appellants.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Robert D. Findley, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Carroll County; Clarence E. Morgan, Jr., Judge.

Before INZER, P. J., and WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
#### Ex parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL.

77-641.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 25, 1978.

MADDOX, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Plaintree Systems Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: November September 27, 2010.







David Watson

President and Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates them by reference.





















---





Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Plaintree Systems Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: September 27, 2010.







Lynn Saunders

Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates them by reference.

























---