alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                         MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION

I, Richard H. Casper, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of DOLPHIN
PRODUCTIONS, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statement were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the"Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date: August 12, 2005                       /s/ Richard H. Casper

                                           ----------------------------
                                           Richard. H. Casper, President
                                           and Principal Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          62,762
<SECURITIES>                                    93,858
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164,944
<PP&E>                                          12,846
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 174,115
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,871
<BONDS>                                          3,179
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                     145,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   174,115
<SALES>                                        213,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               228,751
<CGS>                                          183,581
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,823
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,611
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,212
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,212
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31


</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 41999D0006 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 41999D0006

**The Schengen acquis - Decision of the Executive Committee of 28 April 1999 on the Schengen acquis relating to telecommunications (SCH/Com-ex (99) 6) **

*
Official Journal L 239 , 22/09/2000 P. 0409 - 0410 *

DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

of 28 April 1999

on the Schengen acquis relating to telecommunications

(SCH/Com-ex (99)6)

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE,

Having regard to Article 132 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement,

Having regard to Article 44 of the abovementioned Convention,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

The tactical and operational requirements for a future cross-border digital radio system for the police and customs services in the Schengen States defined in accordance with the mandate pursuant to Article 44, the rules for manufacturing and administering uniform encryption algorithms, and other agreements established within the remit of the Subgroup on telecommunications, as set out in the following nine documents, are hereby approved.

1. SCH/I-telecom (92)21 Rev. 2(1) of 12 June 1992

"Definition of the telecommunications equipment needs of police and customs services"

2. SCH/I-telecom (95)18 of 8 June 1995

"Digital radiocommunications systems for security organisations (tactical and operational requirements)"

3. SCH/I-telecom (96)44 Rev. 5 of 14 November 1997

"Requirements for terminals and their user interfaces in the Schengen States' future digital trunk radio systems"

4. SCH/I-telecom (95)33 Rev. 2 of 6 December 1995

"Request to ETSI for a study of the European norms meeting Schengen functional requirements"

5. SCH/I-telecom (95)35 of 21 November 1995

"Schengen communication requirements and the TETRA standard"

6. SCH/I-telecom-crypto (95)37 Rev. 4 of 8 July 1996

"Digital radio communications network for security organisations (security requirements)"

7. SCH/I-telecom-crypto (97)7 Rev. 5 of 24 February 1998

"Agreement for use and custody of Schengen algorithms"

8. SCH/I-telecom-crypto (97)10 Rev. 2 of 24 February 1998

"Criteria for manufacturing Schengen specific algorithms"

9. SCH/I (98)17 Rev. 4 of 26 May 1998

"Amendment to the mandate of the Subgroup on telecommunications to examine the interoperability aspects of different digital radio communications systems"

Luxembourg, 28 April 1999.

The Chairman,

C. H. Schapper

(1) Restricted document.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE MATTER OF A MEMBER §

OF THE BAR OF THE SUPREME § No. 254, 2023

COURT OF THE STATE OF §

DELAWARE: §

§

ERIC C. HOWARD

, §

Petitioner

. §

Submitted: July 24 , 2023

Decided: July 31 , 2023

Before TRAYNOR

, LEGROW , and GRIFFITHS , Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of Petitioner Eric C. Howard’s application for a

certificate of retirement , which the Office of Disciplinary Counsel does not

oppos e subject to the conditions agreed upon by the parties

,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

(1) Petitioner is granted leave to transfer to retirement status. The Clerk

of the Court is directed to issue Petitioner a certificate of retirement.

(2) Petitioner shall not return to active status in Delaware or file a

petition to do so

.

(3) Petitioner shall not e ngage in the practice of law in any other

jurisdiction.

(4) Practitioner shall not provide any law

- related services unless2

under the direct supervision of a lawyer who is engaged in the active practice of

law in the jurisdiction in which the law

- related services occur

.

/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow

Justice
Exhibit 32.1



                      CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Pursuant of 18 U.S.C. 63 1350, the Director/Acting CEO of PACE Health Management
Systems, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify that this Form 10-KSB and the
financial statements thereto fully comply with the requirements of Sections
13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-KSB and the financial statements thereto fairly
present, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ John Pappajohn
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        John Pappajohn
                                        Director and Acting CEO
                                        March 31, 2005





























                                     - 26 -
Exhibit 99.01

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT I, Robert Klein, President and Chief Executive
Officer of 2Uonline.com, Inc, a Delaware Corporation (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2003(the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 19, 2003

/s/ Robert Klein
---------------
Robert Klein
President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2,742,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  33,677,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    22,250,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               66,289,000
<PP&E>                                         94,804,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 79,479,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 275,781,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          44,841,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       32,538,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   275,781,000
<SALES>                                        73,185,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               73,185,000
<CGS>                                          56,037,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  13,366,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               86,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,382,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,686,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (499,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,187,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0




</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 7102

KEVIN HERRIOTT

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

BRIAN P. STIRLING, Director, in individual and official capacity; CHARLES WILLIAMS, Warden, in individual and official capacity; JOEL ANDERSON, Warden, in individual and official capacity; AARON JOYNER, Warden, in individual and official capacity; MICHAEL STEPHEN, Warden, in individual and official capacity; SCOTT LEWIS, Warden, in individual and official capacity ; WILLIE DAVIS, Warden, in individual and official capacity; RICHARD COTHRAN, Warden, in individual and official capacity; LEVERN COHEN, Warden, in individual and official capacity; DONNIE E. STONEBREAKER, Warden, in individual and official capacity; TERRI E WALLACE, Warden, in individual and official capacity; GARY LANE, Warden, in individual and official capacity; JOHN PATE, Warden, in individual and official capacity; PATRICIA YELDELL, Warden, in individual and official capacity; CORPORAL GAINES, Officer, in individual and official capacity

,

Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at
Greenville

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 6:19

- cv

- 00804

- DCN )

Submitted : July 17, 2020 Decided: July 29, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed as modified by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kevin Herriott, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Kevin Herriott appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and dismissing Herriott ’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (201 8 ) complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (201 8 ). Although our review of the record reveals no reversible

error, we conclude that the claim s against Defendant Donnie Stonebreaker should have

been dismissed without prejudice. * Accordingly, we affirm as modified to reflect a

dismissal without prejudice as to Stonebreaker. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

* The magistrate judge indicated that, of the 15 named defendants, Herriott raised specific allegations against only 2

— Stonebreaker and a correctional officer. As a result, the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the complaint with prejudi ce only as to these two defendants. It appears, however, that the magistrate judge confused Stonebreaker with a nonparty referenced in the complaint. Given that the allegations against Stonebreaker were, in fact, indistinguishable from the allegations ag ainst the other defendants whom the court dismissed without prejudice, we conclude that this was also the appropriate disposition for the claims against Stonebreaker.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             920
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  195,829
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               196,749
<PP&E>                                       7,174,936
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,165,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,206,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,277
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,169,808
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,206,085
<SALES>                                      1,136,669
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,139,239
<CGS>                                          269,792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,994,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (854,991)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (854,991)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 11


                         The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.
               Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
                      (in millions, except per share data)

                                                              12 Weeks Ended
                                                              --------------
                                                            March        March
                                                          20, 2004     22, 2003
                                                          --------     --------
Number of shares on which basic earnings
  per share is based:

Weighted-average outstanding during  period........           260          279

Add - Incremental shares under stock
  compensation plans...............................             9            8
                                                             ----        -----

Number of shares on which diluted
  earnings per share is based......................           269          287

Net earnings applicable to common
  shareholders.....................................         $  50        $  33

Net earnings on which diluted earnings
  per share is based...............................         $  50        $  33

Basic earnings per share...........................         $0.19        $0.12

Diluted earnings per share.........................         $0.19        $0.12
DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM commander visits Distribution headquarters
 
  By Dawn Bonsell, DLA Distribution Public Affairs Officer
  Army Col. Hattie Richardson, commander of DLA Central Command and Special Operations Command, visited DLA Distribution headquarters Jan. 8 for an update of DLA Distribution operations since her prior assignment as commander of DLA Distribution Anniston, Alabama from 2014-2016.    After an office call with Distribution commanding officer, Navy Rear Adm. Kevin Jones, Richardson met with key Distribution staff to receive an organizational update of DLA Distribution’s global reach extending to over 50 locations aligned across 20 states, eight countries, and all Combatant Commands.    Scott Rosbaugh, Distribution’s Future Plans director and other members of the Distribution leadership team presented a general overview of what has changed and what has stayed the same since Richardson was in command of DDAA.    Rosbaugh began the discussion by explaining the major change is that all COCOMS have accelerated now—not just the CENTCOM Area of Responsibility.    The leadership team also updated Richardson on the audit sustainment process, the new Global Distribution Expeditionary Contract, the Joint Expeditionary Force, and Distribution’s expansion to Djibouti, Africa, Iwakuni, Japan, and Busan, Korea.    Modernization efforts with a goal of increasing productivity and reducing costs were also noted, including the new warehouse management system at DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas, to be phased into all Distribution centers. In addition, real time location systems will expedite inventory and a new “goods to person” technology will increase productivity.    Following the update, Richardson expressed her gratitude for everyone taking the time to bring her up to speed, exclaiming, “I didn’t realize how much I didn’t know about Distribution!” Richardson also commented that she has worked with just about everyone in the room and that as far as she’s concerned, “we’re family.” Excited about taking command, yet also knowing there is more to learn, she indicated that she would be reaching out to ask questions.    Richardson then met with Rosbaugh and his Future Plans team to discuss the CENTCOM AOR and the Trans Arabian Network transportation system that decreases transportation costs and improves logistic response times.    Richardson will take command as the new DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM commander during a change-of-command ceremony at CENTCOM headquarters, MacDill Air Force Base, Florida next week.
#### Richard Harold WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-293.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 28, 1970.

Paul L. Martz, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and record having been read and given full consideration and Appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Opinion issued June 18 , 202 4

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 2 4

- 00 201

- CV

—————————

—— COTTON LOGISTICS, INC. , Ap pellant

V. SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION , Appellee

O n Appeal from the 151 st District Cour t

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021

- 83104

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant has file d an unopposed motio n to dismiss its appeal. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(c).2

Accordingly, we g rant appellant ’ s motion and dismiss its appeal. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). We also dismiss all othe r pending motions as mo ot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Kelly and Goodman

.
No. 00-801.

#### Simon *v.*Value Behavioral Health Inc. et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Eddie Wai Hung Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ Eddie Wai Hung Cheung Eddie Wai Hung Cheung Chief Financial Officer Date: November 12, 2007