alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

         Certification Of Chief Executive Officer And Chief Financial Officer
               pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Muoi Van Tran,  Chief Executive  Officer of Optical  Communication  Products,
Inc.  (the  "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the  quarterly  report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended
June 30,  2004,  as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.

/s/ Muoi Van Tran
---------------------------
Muoi Van Tran
Chief Executive Officer
February 14, 2006



I, Susie L. Nemeti, Chief Financial Officer of Optical  Communication  Products,
Inc.  (the  "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the  quarterly  report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended
June 30,  2004,  as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.

/s/ Susie L. Nemeti
--------------------------
Susie L. Nemeti
Chief Financial Officer
February 14, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,667
<SECURITIES>                                    12,071
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,545
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,014
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,762
<PP&E>                                          17,720
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,993)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,887
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,987
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,575
<SALES>                                         18,147
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,147
<CGS>                                            8,158
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  88
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,223)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,223)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,223)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32(a)

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 of Citizens Holding Company (the Company), as
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Greg L. McKee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 7, 2008 |  | /s/ Greg L. McKee                    
|                     |  | Greg L. McKee                        
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 31, 2007

Mr. J. Shelby Sharpe

Sharpe & Tillman, P.C.

6100 Western Place, Suite 1000

Fort Worth, TX 76107

The Honorable Raul A. Gonzalez Jr.

Law Office of Raul A. Gonzalez

10511 River Plantation Dr.

Austin, TX 78747

Mr. Kelly J. Shackelford

Liberty Legal Institute 

903 East 18th Street, Suite 230

Plano, TX 75074-2868

Ms. Amy Warr

Alexander Dubose Jones & Townsend, LLP

515 Congress Ave., Suite 1720

Austin, TX 78701

RE:Case Number:  03-0995

Court of Appeals Number:  03-01-00103-CV

Trial Court Number:  98-09152

Style:HEB MINISTRIES, INC., SOUTHERN BIBLE INSTITUTE, AND HISPANIC BIBLE INSTITUTE

v.

TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD AND COMMISSIONER RAYMUND PAREDES

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinions and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  (Justice Willett not sitting)

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 03-0995Page 2**
Case 4:06-cv-00450-JEJ-AV Document 3 Filed 03/03/06 Page 1 of 4
Case 4:06-cv-00450-JEJ-AV Document 3 Filed 03/03/06 Page 2 of 4
Case 4:06-cv-00450-JEJ-AV Document 3 Filed 03/03/06 Page 3 of 4
Case 4:06-cv-00450-JEJ-AV Document 3 Filed 03/03/06 Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LeCroy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended July 3, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sean B. OConnor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 7, 2010



/s/    SEAN B.
OCONNORSean B. OConnorChief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Daniel FERRI, as Personal Representative of the Estates of Helen Ferri and Anthony J. Ferri, Sr., Appellant, v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE, a Municipal Corporation, Royal Globe Insurance Company, a Foreign Corporation, et al., Appellees.

Nos. II-226 to II-231.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 9, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 25, 1978.

Thomas W. Davis of Barton & Cox, Gainesville, for appellant.

Joe C. Willcox, John R. McDonough, Orlando, Milton Baxley, II, Gainesville, Stanley Moore and Alan E. DeSerio, Tallahassee, for appellees.

MELVIN, Judge.

Anthony J. Ferri, Sr. and Helen Ferri were killed at a highway intersection when a truck collided with the car in which they were riding. The accident occurred in Ala-chua County near the City of Gainesville. By agreement the City had assumed responsibility for maintenance of the traffic light at the intersection.

The personal representative of the Ferris’ estates filed six suits, and now appeal from the orders that granted motions to dismiss with prejudice as to each defendant. The suit against the City of Gainesville was dismissed for failure of the plaintiff to state a cause of actionable negligence. The suit against Alachua County was dismissed for failing to state a cause of action for actionable negligence and the Department of Transportation was dismissed on the ground that residual sovereign immunity had not, by statute, been waived.

It is not necessary that we deal with the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Each com*346plaint falls for failure to state a claim against the named defendant for actionable negligence.

The traffic intersection where the accident occurred had been controlled by a traffic light that for a number of seconds reflected a red, then a yellow, and then a green light. The traffic light became inoperative and the City of Gainesville undertook to repair the same. During the repair period, a decision was made to set the traffic light to flash a continuous red light in the direction being approached by the victims’ automobile, and a flashing yellow light in the direction the truck was approaching. The victims in this accident approached the intersection, and came to a complete stop. Then, for some reason not reflected here, they proceeded into the intersection and in front of the truck.

The traffic signals had obviously served their purpose. They were sufficient to warn and to cause the person driving the Ferri automobile to come to a complete stop. Therefore, it may not be said that either defendant violated a duty to warn the victims of a dangerous intersection. A person does not have the right to require the city, county or the state to maintain any particular type of traffic light at a given time or place. See *Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty.,*342 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), and Section 316.133, Florida Statutes (1975).

Each final judgment appealed from is AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, J., concurs.

SMITH, Acting C. J., dissents, without opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23288]



[[Page 46504]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a 
teleconference meeting of the Advisory Committee to the Director, 
National Cancer Institute.
    This meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance by the public limited to space available. Individuals who 
plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify Linda 
Quick-Cameron, Committee Management Officer, National Cancer Institute, 
Executive Plaza North, Room 609, 6130 Executive Blvd., MSC 7410, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7410 (301/496-5708). A summary of the meeting and 
the roster of committee members will be provided upon request. Other 
information pertaining to the meeting may be obtained from the contact 
person indicated below.

    Committee Name: Advisory Committee to the Director, National 
Cancer Institute.
    Date: September 18, 1997.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31 Conference 
Room 7, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Open: 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: Update on the progress of the NCI Working Groups.
    Contact Person: Susan J. Waldrop, Executive Secretary, National 
Cancer Institute, Federal Building Room 312, 7550 Wisconsin Avenue 
(MSC 9010), Bethesda, MD 20892-9010, 301-496-1458.

    Dated: August 26, 1997.

LaVeen Ponds,
Policy Analyst, NIH, CMO.
[FR Doc. 97-23288 Filed 9-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### David Edward DAWSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-456.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

May 28, 1969.

Rehearing Denied July 28, 1969.

*389Roger E. Whigham, Tampa, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

HOBSON, Acting Chief Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal from an order summarily denying without an evi-dentiary hearing appellant’s motion for postconviction relief under Rule 1.850, F.R.Cr.P. 33 F.S.A.

Appellant was indicted for two offenses of murder in the first degree. He entered a plea of guilty to the lesser included offense of murder in the second degree in each instance. The only point relied on by appellant in his brief is the contention that the guilty pleas were coerced. The record conclusively shows that the pleas of guilty were voluntarily made. The court and the Assistant State’s Attorney asked extensive questions with respect to the voluntary nature of the pleas both at the time of the acceptance of the pleas on October 2, 1967, and again at the time of sentencing on October 11, 1967. At the time of sentencing, the appellant was given the opportunity to withdraw his previous plea of guilty but refused. He was represented by counsel at all stages of the proceedings and he expressly acknowledged his guilt after conferring with such counsel.

Appellant contends that he was wrongfully coerced into giving confessions to the first degree murder charges and that his pleas of guilty to second degree murder were made because of his belief that said confessions would be used to convict him of first degree murder. On October 2, 1967, the date of the entry of the guilty pleas, the appellant’s motions to suppress his confessions were pending. Appellant’s attorney had advised him that he would proceed with the motions to suppress and yet the appellant abandoned these motions.

The lower court correctly concluded that the record conclusively showed that the guilty pleas were entered voluntarily. Young v. State, Fla.App.1968, 216 So.2d 497; Moore v. State, Fla.App.1968, 216 So.2d 766; and Haywood v. State, Fla.App.1969, *218*So.2d 242.

Oral argument is dispensed with as serving no useful purpose pursuant to Rule 3.10(e) F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.

Affirmed.

MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
#### Ruben MANSO and Luis Antonio Comabella, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-854.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 9, 1978.

*271Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Warren S. Schwartz, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by two defendants who were apprehended by police while a burglary was in progress. The jury found defendants Manso and Comabella guilty of attempted breaking and entering a dwelling with intent to commit a felony, and also found defendant Comabella guilty of a second count of possession of burglary tools.

Two points are argued. The first, on behalf of Comabella alone, asserts that the trial court erred in denying a motion to suppress the burglary tools found on Coma-bella’s person after arrest. It is claimed that the officers did not have probable cause to make the arrest. We hold that probable cause clearly existed under the law as set forth in *State v. Outten,*206 So.2d 392, 397 (Fla.1968). See also *Bew v. State,*289 So.2d 465 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974).

The second point, on behalf of both defendants, questions the sufficiency of the evidence concerning the value of the property collected in the apartment preparatory to its transportation therefrom. The evidence of value was sufficient. See *Eaton v. State,*307 So.2d 915 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); and *Roundtree v. State,*236 So.2d 140 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1


OFFER LETTER, FABIO ANGELILLIS


August 21, 2000

Fabio Angelillis

Dear Fabio,

We are pleased to offer you the position of Executive Vice President,
Engineering for Broadbase Software, Inc., reporting to Chuck Bay, Chief
Executive Officer.

This letter outlines the proposed terms of employment with Broadbase. Your start
date will be determined.

        -       Your annual salary will be $200,000 paid semi-monthly.

        -       There is an incentive (MBO) bonus associated with this position
                allowing you to make an additional $40,000. Your bonus will be
                based on achievement of your objectives and is paid in two
                installments on a semi-annual basis.

I will recommend that you be granted an option to purchase 400,000 shares of
stock. This grant is subject to approval by the Board of Directors after your
employment begins. The option would vest on a monthly basis over four years
subject to a three-month cliff and would be governed by the terms set forth in
the Company's standard form of stock options agreement. The purchase price of
132,000 shares will be at $1.00 per share and the purchase price of the
remaining 268,000 shares covered by the option will be the closing price of the
Company's common stock on the date of the approval of the grant by the Board.

The Company will provide to you the health, holiday, vacation and other benefits
available to all its employees. Enclosed for your review is information related
to some of the benefits.

To indicate your acceptance of this offer of employment, please sign below. Your
employment at Broadbase is subject to your signing the attached Employee
Invention Assignment, Confidentiality and Arbitration Agreement. Your employment
will not be governed by a written or oral contract. You will be an "at-will"
employee, which means that either you or the Company may terminate your
employment at any time, for any or no reason, and with or without notice. This
at-will nature of your employment cannot be modified except by a writing signed
by an executive officer of Broadbase.

Fabio, all of us welcome you in joining Broadbase and we look forward to having
you on our team. Meanwhile, if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
call me.

Sincerely,



Rusty Thomas
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Accepted:

Signature:   /s/     Fabio Angelillis
             ---------------------------------
Name:  Fabio Angelillis

Start Date:
             ---------------------------------
#### Allen HENDRICKS v. STATE of Florida.

No. 39080.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Appeals dismissed without opinion. 226 So.2d 480.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24687]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3666-000]


GPU Advanced Resources, Inc; Notice of Issuance of Order

September 12, 1997.
    GPU Advanced Resources, Inc. (Advanced Resources) filed an 
application for authorization to sell power at market-based rates, and 
for certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, Advanced 
Resources requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 
CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liabilities by Advanced Resources. On September 4, 1997, the Commission 
issued an Order Conditionally Accepting For Filing Proposed Market-
Based Rates (Order), in the above-docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's September 4, 1997 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (D), (E), and (G):
    (D) Within 30 days of the date of issuance of this order, any 
person desiring to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket 
approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by 
Advanced Resources should file a motion to intervene or protest with 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214.
    (E) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (D) above, Advanced Resources is hereby authorized 
to issue securities and to assume obligations or liabilities as 
guarantor, endorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of 
another person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some 
lawful object within the corporate purposes of Advanced Resources, 
compatible with the public interest, and reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    (G) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of Advanced 
Resources' issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities. * * *
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is October 6, 1997.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24687 Filed 9-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00360-CV

Texas Education Agency and Michael L. Williams, Commissioner of Education, 

in his Official Capacity, Appellants

v.

American Youthworks, Inc. d/b/a American Youthworks Charter School and 

Honors Academy, Inc. d/b/a Honors Academy Charter School, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-14-000672, HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellees’ emergencymotion fortemporaryordersis denied. SeeTex.R.App. P. 29.3.

It is ordered June 17, 2014.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose