alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2020135DE.01001501.xml

| 29.4.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 135/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 135/15

---

Berichtigung der Regelung Nr. 48 der Wirtschaftskommission der Vereinten Nationen für Europa (UNECE) — Einheitliche Bedingungen für die Genehmigung von Fahrzeugen hinsichtlich des Anbaus der Beleuchtungs- und Lichtsignaleinrichtungen [2019/57]

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 14 vom 16. Januar 2019
  )

Seite 127, Anhang 4, Abbildung 2:

Anstatt:

Image 1

muss es heißen:

Image 2

---
#### John *W.*Herbert, appellant, *v.*Henry L. Herbert, respondent.

1. When a judgment has been entered by force of proceedings in attachment, a court of chancery may intervene and set aside or control such procedure if the same has been tainted with fraud.

2. Such jurisdiction will not obtain on the mere ground that the claim in suit was unfounded.

3. When it appears that a plaintiff in attachment knows that the claim he .seeks to enforce has no legal efficacy, and he obtains a judgment and sale of the defendant’s property by a surreptitious use of regular process and proceedings, such judgment will be opened and the sale set aside in equity.

On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Van Fleet, whose opinion is reported in *Herbert*v. *Herbert, 4 Dick. Ch. Rep. 70.*

*566
      *Mr. William H. Vredenburgh*and *Mr. Joseph D. Bedle,*for the appellant.

*Mr. Theodore*Runyon, for the respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beasley, C. J.

This bill was exhibited for relief against the sale and conveyance, by an auditor in attachment, of certain real estate, situated at Long Branch. At the sale in question, the plaintiff in attachment became the purchaser, and, accordingly, took a deed from the auditor. The proceedings in attachment were regular in all formal respects.

We are of opinion that in such a case as this the only ground' of jurisdiction of a court of equity is the presence of frauddn the proceedings. The court of chancery cannot intervene in this class of' cases merely on the ground that the claim that has passed to judgment is not, in point of fact was not, justly due or was of a contestable character, for such a principle would obviously give a general superintendence to equity over most of' the judgments taken by force of the process in question.

This court, therefore, affirms the decree in this case on the-ground that the plaintiff in attachment fraudulently used and managed that proceeding for the enforcement of a claim that he-knew had no legal efficacy.

Let the decree appealed from be affirmed, with the addition' that the plaintiff in attachment be forever enjoined from using or enforcing the judgment obtained by him, unless he shall, within thirty days from this date, open the said judgment and. let in the defendant in said proceeding to defend the suit.

*For affirmance*— The Chief-Justice, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Werts, Brown, Smith, Whitaker — 9.

*For reversal*— Dixon, Garrison, Bogert, Clement — 4.
254 La. 810

#### Blanche POUNDS et al. v. Eppie Jane Gordon YANCY et al.

No. 50050.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 23, 1969.

In re: Blanche Pounds et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Helena. 224 So.2d 1.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Mind2Market,   Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
James Clark,  CEO of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ James Clark
                                         --------------------------------
                                         James Clark, CEO

Dated: August 24, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2031 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2031

To provide for the valuation of employee personal use of noncommercial 
         aircraft for purposes of Federal income tax inclusion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 17, 2005

  Mr. Dayton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the valuation of employee personal use of noncommercial 
         aircraft for purposes of Federal income tax inclusion.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VALUATION OF EMPLOYEE PERSONAL USE OF NONCOMMERCIAL 
              AIRCRAFT.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of Federal income tax inclusion, the 
value of any employee personal use of noncommercial aircraft shall 
equal the excess (if any) of--
            (1) greater of--
                    (A) the fair market value of such use, or
                    (B) the actual cost of such use (including all 
                fixed and variable costs), over
            (2) any amount paid by or on behalf of such employee for 
        such use.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall apply to use after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
OFFICE OF THE **ATTORNEY** GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

To& inquiPy of tlm what is aow iaolud4d inVarno a803b, %otion 4, the ;Iollelf IOU quote

### fma st4tut*o, btlol4
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Financial profile of dairy cooperatives**
 
1997 | 2002 | 2007 | 2012
 
SuDoc Number:A 109.10: D 14/
Item Number:0064-A (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001065215
 
July 25, 2018
Exhibit 6.40Exhibit
10.40

| | SECOND AMENDMENT TO BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT (ASSET BASED) | 
| | --------------------------------------------------------- | 

|Principal$1,200,000.00                                                                                                                                                                                                      | Loan Date09-01-2003 | Maturity04-15-2004 | Loan No | Call / Coll | Account0010130085 | Officer*** | Initials
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------ | ------- | ----------- | ----------------- | ---------- | --------
|References in the shaded area are for Lender's use only and do not limit the applicability of this document to any particular loan or
item.Any item above containing "***" has been omitted due to text length limitations.

|Borrower: | PORTLAND BREWING COMPANY2730 NW 31ST AVENUEPORTLAND, OR  97210 | Lender: | Washington Mutual BankBeaverton Commercial Banking Center12655 SW Center Street, Suite 500
Beaverton, OR  97005
|--------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

This SECOND AMENDMENT TO BUSINESS
LOAN AGREEMENT (ASSET BASED) is attached to and by this reference made a part of the
BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT (ASSET BASED) DATED SEPTEMBER 1, 2003 (the Agreement),
executed in connection with a loan or other financial accommodations between WASHINGTON
MUTUAL BANK (Lender) and PORTLAND BREWING COMPANY (Borrower).

The Agreement is amended as follows:

Page 6, under Definitions, Paragraph
titled Borrowing Base, modify to read as follows:

The words Borrowing Base mean,
as determined by Lender from time to time, the lesser of (1) $1,200,000.00 or (2) 80.000%
of the aggregate amount of Eligible Accounts.

Beginning on October 31, 2003, the
inventory advance will be incrementally decreased, as the following table shows:

|Date              | Advance Rate | 
|----------------- | ------------ | 
|Through 10/31/03  | 50.000%      | 
|11/01/03-11/30/03 | 40.000%      | 
|12/01/03-12/31/03 | 40.000%      | 
|01/01/04-01/31/04 | 40.000%      | 
|02/01/04-02/28/04 | 40.000%      | 
|03/01/04-03/21/04 | 40.000%      | 
|04/01/04-maturity | 40.000%      | 

All other terms and conditions of the
Agreement remain in full force and effect.

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO BUSINESS
LOAN AGREEMENT (ASSET BASED) DATED SEPTEMBER 1, 2003 IS EXECUTED ON MARCH 8, 2003.

BORROWER:

PORTLAND BREWING COMPANY

By:/s/ FREDERICK BOWMAN
        FREDERICK BOWMAN, President of PORTLAND   
     BREWING COMPANY

LENDER:

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

By:/s/ MICHAEL MCKAY
        Authorized Signer

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2471]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of a 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Special Emphasis 
Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Endotoxin and Susceptibility to Chemical Toxicity.
    Date: February 28, 1997.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 
South Campus, Building 101, Conference Room C, Research Triangle 
Park, NC.
    Contact Person: Dr. Linda K. Bass, National Institute of 
Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD 17-09, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27709, (919) 541-1307.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.113, 
Biological Response to Environmental Agents; 93.114, Applied 
Toxicological Research and Testing; 93.115, Biometry and Risk 
Estimation; 93.894, Resource and Manpower Development, National 
Institutes of Health.)

    Dated: January 23, 1997.
Paula N. Hayes,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-2471 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS AND OPINION ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

The Board of Directors
Avant! Corporation

     The audits referred to in our report dated February 12, 2001, except as to
Note 7, which is as of March 23, 2001, included the related consolidated
financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2000, and for each of the years
in the two year period ended December 31, 2000, as listed in the index in Item
14(a) 2 herein. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this
financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.

        We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-18445, 333-43087 and 333-58372) on Form S-3, and (Nos. 333-16981,
333-16303, 333-15159, 333-06405, 333-27301, 333-71473, 333-53365, 333-44413,
333-85541, and 333-86011,333-44970, 333-35038, 333-58496, 033-93180, 033-99860,
333-65305 and 333-68986) on Form S-8 of Avant! Corporation of our reports dated
February 12, 2001, except as to Note 7, which is as of March 23, 2001, relating
to the consolidated balance sheet of Avant! Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the
years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2000, and the related
consolidated financial statement schedule.


                                               /s/ KPMG LLP



Mountain View, California
April 1, 2002
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, John D. Doherty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Central Bancorp, Inc.,certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Central Bancorp, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:August 12, 2005     /s/ John D. Doherty     John D. Doherty  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17

- 967 V

Filed: April 19, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

LISA WORKMAN

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC , for

petitioner.

Meredith Burns Healy

, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On July 18, 2017

, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the “Vaccine

Act”). Petitioner alleges that that she developed a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration (“SIRVA”) in her left shoulder as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine

administer ed to her on September 23, 2016 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to

the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 12, 2019

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that petitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine

Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the

disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasio n of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned

agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from

public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this

case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in

accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management

and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).

2 N ational Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

.2

at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “ petitioner has satisfied the criteria for SIRVA

set f orth in the recently revised Vaccine Injury Table .” Id. at 4 . Respondent further

agrees that “ based on the record as it now stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal

prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id. at 5.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the

undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFinite-rate water condensation in combustion-heated wind tunnelsA quasi-one-dimensional method for computing finite rate nucleation and droplet growth of water in a supersonic expansion of combustion products is presented. Sample computations are included for the Langley 8 foot High Temperature Tunnel, but the method can also be applied to other combustion heated wind tunnels. The sample results indicate that the free stream static pressure can be in the range of 25 to 60 percent greater than that computed for isentropic nozzle flow without water condensation. The method provides a tool for examining the effects of water condensation on static state properties and velocity of the supersonic stream in combustion heated wind tunnels.Document ID19880018691Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsErickson, Wayne D.*(Computer Sciences Corp. Hampton, VA., United States)*Mall, Gerald H.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Prabhu, Ramadas K.*(PRC Systems Services Co. Hampton, Va., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1988Subject CategoryResearch And Support Facilities (Air)Report/Patent NumberL-16443NASA-TP-2833NAS 1.60:2833Accession Number88N28075Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-31-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880018691.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2085 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2085

 To provide a supplemental payment to assist agricultural producers in 
  mitigating increasing input costs, including energy and fertilizer 
                                 costs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 13, 2005

  Mr. Baucus introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide a supplemental payment to assist agricultural producers in 
  mitigating increasing input costs, including energy and fertilizer 
                                 costs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT.

    (a) In General.--To assist agricultural producers in mitigating 
increasing input costs (including energy and fertilizer costs), the 
Secretary of Agriculture shall make available to producers on a farm 
that are eligible for a direct payment under section 1103 or 1303 of 
the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 7913, 
7953) a supplemental payment equal to the amount of the direct payment 
that the producers on the farm received for the 2005 crop under that 
section.
    (b) Administration.--The Secretary shall use the funds, facilities, 
and authorities of the Commodity Credit Corporation to carry out this 
section.
    (c) Emergency Designation.--The amounts made available by the 
transfer of funds in or pursuant to this section are designated as an 
emergency requirement pursuant to section 402 of H. Con. Res. 95 (109th 
Congress).
                                 <all>
```