alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                           8,999
<SECURITIES>                                    18,358
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     34,964
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,412
<PP&E>                                          45,802
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,922
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,076
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           168
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,309
<SALES>                                        138,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               138,684
<CGS>                                           76,003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,003
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (897)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (48,981)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,929
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (61,910)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (61,910)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.26)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23395]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EC97-48-000]


Lake Benton Power Partners, LLC; Notice of Filing

August 28, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 18, 1997 and August 22, 1997, Lake 
Benton Power Partners, LLC tendered for filing amendments in the above-
referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Avenue, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before September 8, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23395 Filed 9-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. _____________

In the

Court of Criminal Appeals

At Austin 

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯♦⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

No. 14-15-00254-CR

In the

Court of Appeals

for the

Fourteenth District of Texas

at Houston

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯♦⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

No. 1396938

In the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯♦⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯

ALFREDO RAMIREZ

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

Appellee

⎯⎯⎯⎯♦⎯⎯⎯⎯

APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

WITHIN WHICH TO FILE 

PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

⎯⎯⎯⎯♦⎯⎯⎯⎯

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

APPELLANT, Alfredo Ramirez, pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(c) 

moves for an extension of time within which to file its petition for 

discretionary review. In support of its motion, appellant submits the 

following: 

PD-0564-16

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 5/20/2016 10:36:54 AM

Accepted 5/20/2016 3:16:08 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
1. Appellant was charged with felony assault on a family member by 

impeding breathing.

2. A jury found Appellant guilty and the Court sentenced him on 

March 2, 2015 to 20 years confinement in the Texas Department 

of Corrections Institutional Division. 

3. A unanimous panel of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals rendered 

judgment in an unpublished opinion on April 21, 2016, affirming

appellant’s conviction and sentence. 

4. Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is due May 21, 2016. 

5. Appellant seeks an extension, in accordance with TEX. R. APP. 

P. 68.2(c), until June 21, 2016, to file its petition for discretionary 

review. This is appellant’s first request for an extension. 

6. Petitioner is presently incarcerated in TDCJ and counsel needs 

additional time to prepare his petition for discretionary review due 

to her current caseload. Appellant’s petition is not for purposes of 

delay, but so that justice may be done.

WHEREFORE, the Appellant prays that this Court will grant the 

requested extension until June 21, 2016. 

Respectfully submitted,

 s/Tonya Rolland McLaughlin 

Tonya Rolland McLaughlin

1523 Yale Street

Houston Texas 77008

Phone: (713) 529-8500

Fax: (713) 453-2203 

TBN 24054176

tonya@rollandlaw.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing instrument has been 

emailed to the following:

kugler_eric@dao.hctx.net

Appellate Division

Harris County District Attorney’s Office

1201 Franklin Suite 600

Houston, Texas 77002-1923

_/s/ Tonya Rolland McLaughlin__

Tonya Rolland McLaughlin
EXHIBIT
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of
 Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
  Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that:
  The
Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the "Form 10-Q")
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Innocom Technology
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
  Date:
      May 18, 2010
                
                
                /s/
      William Yan Sui HuiWilliam
      Yan Sui Hui, Chief Executive
Officer
1 

### Hutson, Nick

From: CurryBrown, Amanda Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 9:54 PM To: Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov Cc: Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov; Hutson, Nick; Fruh, Stev e; Culligan, Kevin; Weatherhead, Darryl Subject: Updated Version of 111(b) RIA and Response to Inter agency Comments Attachments: EO 12866_111(b) New-Mods 2060-AQ91 RIA Final_072720 15.docx; EO 12866_111(b) NewMods 2060-AQ91 RIA Final_07272015_CLEAN.docx; SummaryofinteragencycommentsunderEO 12866_111(b) Ne w-Mods 2060-AQ91 RIA Final_7 _21_2015.docx



### Hi Nathan,

Please see attached for a revised version of the 11 1b RIA and response to the most recent set of OMB c omments. I’ve included a clean version, as well as a RLSO that sh ows changes since the last submission on 7/14.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

Amanda

Amanda Curry Brown Health and Environmental Impacts Division U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standar ds
919.541.3808 CurryBrown.Amanda@epa.gov
TBPLS Firm No. 10074302

February 11, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application to Amend Section 333 Exemption No. 12996

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-2777

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to the Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the "Reform

Act"), Westwood Professional Services, Inc (“Westwood”) seeks an amendment to our existing

Section 333 Exemption. The FAA granted to Westwood an exemption via letter dated

September 25, 2015. The letter was marked Exemption No. 12996, Regulatory Docket No.

FAA-2015-2777.

Westwood requests that our Section 333 exemption be amended so the DJI Inspire 1 unmanned

aircraft (“UA”) is added as an authorized UA. The Inspire 1 is widely used in the aerial

photography and mapping industry and has been previously approved in past FAA Section 333

exemptions. The Inspire 1 specs can be found at: http://www.dji.com/product/inspire1/info#specs. No additional amendments or changes to Exemption No. 12996, other than the

addition of the DJI Inspire 1 UA, are requested at this time.

Applicant information

Westwood Professional Services, Inc.

Contact: Chad Grismer

7699 Anagram Drive

Eden Prairie, MN 55344

Telephone: 952-937-5150

Email: chad.grismer@westwoodps.com
Page 2

Thank you for considering Westwood’s amendment request. Please contact us if you have any

questions or need additional information.

Sincerely,

WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Chad Grismer

Senior Project Engineer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2035 

To extend the time required for construction of a hydroelectric project in 

the State of Idaho, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2005 

Mr. CRAIG (for himself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To extend the time required for construction of a hydroelectric project in the State of Idaho, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ARROWROCK HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT. 

4 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 

5 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 

6 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com7 mission project numbered 4656, on request of the licensee, 

8 the Commission shall— 
2 

•S 2035 IS

1 (1) if the license for the project is in effect on 

2 the date of enactment of this Act, extend the period 

3 for commencing construction of project works for a 

4 period of 3 years beginning on the date of enactment 

5 of this Act; or 

6 (2) if the license for the project expired before 

7 the date of enactment of this Act, reinstate and ex8 tend the period for commencing construction of 

9 project works for an additional 3-year period begin10 ning on the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41220

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CALVIN FONVILLE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:01-CR-3-ALL

--------------------

June 7, 2002

Before JOLLY, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Calvin Fonville appeals from a conviction for being a

prisoner in possession of marijuana in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 1791(a)(2). Fonville argues that the evidence was insufficient

to support his conviction. We review Fonville’s sufficiency

challenge in the light most favorable to the Government,

determining whether any reasonable trier of fact could have found

that the evidence established the essential elements of the crime
No. 01-41220

-2-

beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Ortega Reyna,

148 F.3d 540, 543 (5th Cir. 1998). Extensive testimony from one

of the prison officers who recovered the marijuana from

Fonville’s cell locker secured by a personal combination lock,

established sufficient evidence to support the conviction under

18 U.S.C § 1791(a)(2).

Fonville also argues that the trial court erred in striking

two prospective jurors for cause. We defer to the trial court’s

determination regarding juror credibility and bias, and absent an

abuse of discretion, this court will not second guess the trial

court’s determination. United States v. Duncan, 191 F.3d 569,

573 (5th Cir. 1999). The record from jury voir dire supports the

trial court’s decision to exclude the two potential jurors.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
### Inventory of unpublished hydrologic data

By: William T. HollandClarence S. Jarvis

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp837

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# DSCR employees attend a Safety Stand Down Oct. 23 

/ Published Oct. 29, 2018
Richmond, Va, 
Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia, employees attended a Safety Stand Down Oct. 23.

David Gibson, site director, Defense Logistics Agency Installation Operations Richmond, opened activities following the DLA Aviation Commander Air Force Brig. Gen. Linda Hurry’s Town Hall in the Frank B. Lotts Conference Center.

Gibson thanked employees for their continued involvement in workplace safety.  He gave special thanks to the center’s Leadership Working Group for their suggestion to install lighted crosswalk signs across the center to increase crosswalk safety awareness.  

Other key personnel who shared information with employees during the Lotts opening brief included Neena Scott, a quality assurance specialist and member of the DSCR Safety Team and Vonya Lofties, chief, Safety and Occupational Health Division, DLA Installation Operations Richmond.

Scott reviewed processes for reporting potential hazard/near miss incidents through the Enterprise Safety Application Management System and service order request. Lofties spoke about the center’s upcoming Voluntary Protection Program STAR re-certification by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration in 2019.  Defense Supply Center Richmond received initial certification in 2016.   

Following the opening, employees visited Safety Day informational displays in the conference center breezeway and participated in Safety Day activities within their directorates.
#### CITY OF BATON ROUGE v. Barney Dean LAY et al.

No. 12051.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

June 12, 1978.

Joseph F. Keogh, Parish Atty., Charles Pilcher, Asst. Parish Atty., Baton Rouge, of counsel for plaintiff-appellee, City of Baton Rouge.

Charles S. McCowan, Jr., Baton Rouge, of counsel for defendant-appellant, Barney Dean Lay and Bruce Foreman.

Before LOTTINGER, EDWARDS and PONDER, JJ.

LOTTINGER, Judge.

This suit was consolidated for purposes of issuance of a preliminary injunction and trial on the merits for a permanent suit entitled, *“Donald Rickey Norton and Sharon C. Norton v. Barney Dean Lay, Jr., et al.”*number 12050, on the docket of this Court, 360 So.2d 239. For the reasons given in the opinion this day rendered in suit number 12050, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed at appellants’ costs.

AFFIRMED.
United States Department of Agriculture

USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service offers voluntary Farm Bill 

conservation programs that benefit agricultural producers and the environment.

Benefits

Producers receive conservation technical and financial assistance to construct or 

improve water management or irrigation structures, plant trees for windbreaks or, 

in order to improve water quality and mitigate risk, diversify their operation and 

conservation practices including soil erosion control, integrated pest management 

or transition to organic farming. 

Persons or legal entities cannot receive more than $50,000 in AMA program 

payments per fiscal year.

Helping People Help the Land

Overview

The Agricultural Management 

Assistance Program (AMA) 

helps agricultural producers use 

conservation to manage risk 

and address natural resource 

issues through natural resources 

conservation. NRCS administers 

the AMA conservation 

provisions, while the Agricultural 

Marketing Service and the 

Risk Management Agency 

implement other provisions 

under AMA.

Agricultural Management Assistance Program

March 2014

AMA
More Information

For more information visit your local 

USDA Service Center or 

www.nrcs.usda.gov/farmbill.

Find your local USDA Service 

Center 

http://offices.usda.govnd management of rare and 

declining habitats;

Eligibility

AMA is available in 16 states where 

participation in the Federal Crop 

Insurance Program is historically 

low: Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, 

Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, 

Nevada, New Hampshire, New 

Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, 

Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, West 

Virginia and Wyoming.

Persons and legal entities who 

receive payments under the 

AMA program are subject to the 

Adjusted Gross Income limitation 

provisions. All participants must 

agree to implement and maintain 

conservation practices for the life of 

the practice.

Eligible land includes agricultural 

land, nonindustrial private forest 

land or other land on which 

agricultural products, livestock, or 

forest-related products are produced 

and where risk may be mitigated by 

NRCS field staff and producers discussing the practice of field 

shelter belts.

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 

www.nrcs.usda.gov.

diversifying the operation or adding 

conservation practices that support 

soil erosion control, integrated pest 

management and organic farming.

How to apply 

Visit your local USDA Service Center 

to apply or visit 

www.nrcs.usda.gov/getstarted.

What’s new in AMA 

New adjusted gross income (AGI) 

requirements apply. The AGI 

limitation is now set at $900,000.
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 140I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 140I |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Rocznik 6421 kwietnia 2021 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 140I

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Rocznik 6421 kwietnia 2021

---

| Spis treści | Strona |
| --- | --- |
| | Sprostowania |
| | Sprostowanie do: Europejska Agencja Bezpieczeństwa i Zdrowia w Pracy (EU-OSHA), Bilbao – Ogłoszenie o naborze na stanowisko Dyrektora Wykonawczego (Zatrudnienie na czas określony – grupa zaszeregowania AD 14) – COM/2020/20049 ( Dz.U. C 171 A z 19.5.2020 ) | 1 |

Spis treści

Strona

Sprostowania

Sprostowanie do: Europejska Agencja Bezpieczeństwa i Zdrowia w Pracy (EU-OSHA), Bilbao – Ogłoszenie o naborze na stanowisko Dyrektora Wykonawczego (Zatrudnienie na czas określony – grupa zaszeregowania AD 14) – COM/2020/20049 ( Dz.U. C 171 A z 19.5.2020 )

( Dz.U. C 171 A z 19.5.2020 )

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

Sprostowania

| 21.4.2021 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CI 140/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2021

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CI 140/1

---

Sprostowanie do: Europejska Agencja Bezpieczeństwa i Zdrowia w Pracy (EU-OSHA), Bilbao – Ogłoszenie o naborze na stanowisko Dyrektora Wykonawczego (Zatrudnienie na czas określony – grupa zaszeregowania AD 14) – COM/2020/20049

(
  Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej C 171 A z dnia 19 maja 2020 r.
  )

(2021/C 140 I/01)

Strona 4, akapit szósty:

zamiast:

„Zanim Zarząd powoła na stanowisko dyrektora jednego z kandydatów figurujących na liście, zostaną oni poproszeni o wystąpienie przed właściwymi organami Rady i komisją Parlamentu Europejskiego i udzielenie odpowiedzi na pytania. Parlament Europejski i Rada Unii Europejskiej przedstawiają wówczas swoje opinie i określają preferowaną kolejność kandydatów. Zarząd powołuje Dyrektora Wykonawczego; uwzględnia przy tym wyżej wymienione opinie.”,

powinno być:

„Wybranego kandydata wzywa się do złożenia oświadczenia przed Parlamentem Europejskim i do udzielenia odpowiedzi na pytania posłów do Parlamentu Europejskiego.”.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GSIGroup Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn E. Davis, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

 

December 13, 2010

This Certification shall not be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section, or incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission by implication or by any reference in any such filings to the Report. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GSI Group Inc. and will be retained by GSI Group Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.