alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SOUTH FLORIDA BEACHES AIRCRAFT, INC., Appellant, v. AIR METAL COMPANY, INC., and Canadian Aerocon, Ltd., Appellees.

No. 76-1568.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 2, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 16, 1977.

*213Thomas F. Pepe, Miami, for appellant. Shutts & Bowen and Brenton Ver Ploeg, Miami, for appellees.

Before HAVERFIELD, BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ.

HAVERFIELD, Judge.

This is an appeal by South Florida Beaches Aircraft, Inc. from an adverse final summary judgment in favor of defendant, Canadian Aerocon, Ltd., in a breach of contract action.

South Florida Beaches Aircraft, Inc. filed a breach of contract action against Canadian Aerocon, Ltd., which manufactures aircraft parts, and alleged that it had entered into a written agreement with Raymond Wheeler, as agent for Canadian Aerocon, whereby plaintiff was given the exclusive right to sell “spar kits” (aircraft wing supports) in the South Florida area manufactured by Canadian Aerocon. Plaintiff further alleged that the agreement provided that it was subject to validation by Canadian Aerocon under separate cover and Canadian Aerocon ratified and accepted the agreement; that Canadian Aerocon subsequently breached the agreement by allowing Air Metal Company, Inc.1 to also sell the “spar kits”. Canadian Aerocon answered and thereafter filed a motion for summary judgment with supporting affidavits to the effect that it had never ratified the agreement. Raymond Wheeler also filed an affidavit that he was never authorized to bind Canadian Aerocon, hence the proviso for validation under separate cover by Canadian Aerocon. Plaintiff filed two affidavits in opposition to the motion for summary judgment. After a hearing, the trial judge entered summary judgment for Canadian Aerocon. We affirm.

Validation under separate cover by Canadian Aerocon clearly was a condition precedent to the agreement. There being no such validation, the agreement never became effective. See 7 Fla.Jur. Contracts § 104 (1956) and Cf. *Rork v. Las Olas Co.,*156 Fla. 510, 23 So.2d 839, 842 (1945).

Next, Raymond Wheeler as per his affidavit was not authorized by Canadian Aero-con under his agency to enter into the subject agreement and thereby bind Canadian Aerocon. This fact is clearly gleaned from the provision in the agreement requiring the validation under separate cover.

Finally, there was no acceptance by acquiescence or inference because Canadian Aerocon not only shipped spar kits to plaintiff, but also to other dealers in Florida and, therefore, acted contrary to, not consistent with, the subject agreement purporting to make plaintiff the exclusive sales agent in Florida.

Summary judgment affirmed.

1

. South Florida Beaches Aircraft, Inc. also sued Air Metal Company, Inc. in the same action for tortiously interfering with its contractual relationship with Canadian Aerocon. However, summary judgment was only requested by and entered for Canadian Aerocon. Therefore, Air Metal Company is not a party to this appeal.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-2233

VERONICA M. JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JUDGE JOHNNY E. MORRISON; CYNTHIA P. MORRISON,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:21-cv-00550-AWA-RJK)

Submitted: April 20, 2023 Decided: April 24, 2023

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Veronica Moody Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2233 Doc: 6 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Veronica Moody Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. 

§§ 1983, 1985, 1986 amended complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. 

Johnson v. Morrison, No. 2:21-cv-00550-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. Nov. 4, 2022). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2233 Doc: 6 Filed: 04/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24372]

[[Page 48271]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM97-13-29-000]

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

September 9, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 3, 1997 Transcontinental Gas Pipe 
Line Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing to become part its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, Sixth Revised Sheet No. 50, to 
be effective July 1, 1997.
    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is to track 
rate changes attributable to transportation service purchased from 
Texas Gas Transmission Corporation (Texas Gas) under its Rate Schedule 
FT the costs of which are included in the rates and charges payable 
under Transco's Rate Schedule FT-NT. Transco states that the filing is 
being made pursuant to tracking provisions under Section 4 of Transco's 
Rate Schedule FT-NT.
    Transco states that included in Appendix B attached to the filing 
is the explanation of the rate changes and details regarding the 
computation of the revised Rate Schedule FT-NT rates.
    Transco states that copies of the filing are being mailed to each 
of its FT-NT customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24372 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Harry Stylli, Chief Executive Officer of Sequenom, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Quarterly Report)
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d), of the Exchange Act, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Quarterly Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has set their hands hereto as of the 15th day of May, 2007.



/s/ HARRY STYLLIHarry StylliChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)




40
DSpace Repository

# Great Tzotzil Dictionary of San Lorenzo Zinacantán

Login

      -  DSpace Home 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions Series 
      - →
      -  Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology 
      - →
      - View Item

# Great Tzotzil Dictionary of San Lorenzo Zinacantán

Laughlin, Robert M.

DOI:					https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.19.1

Date:					1975

### Abstract:					

### Citation:					

*Great Tzotzil Dictionary of San Lorenzo Zinacantán**Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology*https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810223.19.1

Show full item record

## Files in this item

Name:SCtA-0019-Hi_res.pdf

Size:271.9Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0019-Lo_res.pdf

Size:26.05Mb

Format:PDF

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0019.epub

Size:16.04Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:ePub

View/Open

Name:SCtA-0019.mobi

Size:24.36Mb

Format:Unknown

Description:mobi

View/Open

## This item appears in the following Collection(s)

            -  Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology  [60]  

# Search DSpace

# Browse

              -  All of DSpace                  -  Communities & Collections 
                -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 
              -  This Collection                  -  By Issue Date 
                -  Authors 
                -  Titles 
                -  Subjects 

# My Account

              -  Login 

Terms of UsePrivacyContact UsSend Feedback

DSpace softwareDuraSpace

Theme by
Below is a quick summary of changes made to conservation programs in the new Farm Bill, enacted on February 7, 2014. These programs are administered 

by USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service.  The new Farm Bill streamlines conservation programs that enable farmers, ranchers and forest 

landowners to get assistance.

To get started with NRCS, visit www.nrcs.usda.gov/GetStarted or visit your local USDA service center.

Your guide to the new

Farm Bill

United States

Department of

Agriculture

An equal opportunity provider and employer.

Conservation Programs

Environmental Quality Incentives Program

 Previous Farm Bill 

Environmental Quality Incentives Program

Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program

Financial Assistance

Conservation Stewardship Program Conservation Stewardship Program

Agricultural Conservation Easement Program

Wetlands Reserve Program

Grassland Reserve Program

Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program

Healthy Forests Reserve Program Healthy Forests Reserve Program

Cooperative Conservation Partnership Initiative

Agricultural Water Enhancement Program

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Initiative

Great Lakes Basin Program

Regional Conservation Partnership Program

Technical Service Providers Technical Service Providers

Conservation Innovation Grants 

Agriculture Conservation Experienced 

 Services Program

Voluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive 

 Program – administered by Farm Service Agency

Conservation Innovation Grants

Agriculture Conservation Experienced 

 Services Program

Voluntary Public Access and Habitat 

 Incentive Program 

Easements Partnerships Other

Emergency Watershed Protection Program* Emergency Watershed Protection Program*

Agricultural Management Assistance Agricultural Management Assistance

Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program* Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program*

*EWP and Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program are not Farm Bill programs but are offered by NRCS; Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program was funded through the 2014 Farm Bill.

vs. New and Streamlined Farm Bill
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


November 10, 2015


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, Enhanced Value II Trust, Series
13


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, Enhanced Value II Trust, Series 13 set forth above (the “Trust”).
We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our
evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on November 9, 2015, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in
the Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the
party performing the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-206905) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an
exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                        


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
# L_2023013EN.01000401.xml

| 16.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 13/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 13/4

---

DECISION (EU) 2023/109 OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

of 11 January 2023

appointing a judge to the General Court

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 19 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 254 and 255 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The terms of office of 27 judges of the General Court expired on 31 August 2022, including that of Ms Beatrix RICZIOVÁ, who was appointed Judge of the General Court, on a proposal from the Government of the Slovak Republic, by Decision (EU) 2022/1046 of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States (1). An appointment to that post should therefore be made for the period from the date of entry into force of this Decision to 31 August 2028. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The terms of office of 27 judges of the General Court expired on 31 August 2022, including that of Ms Beatrix RICZIOVÁ, who was appointed Judge of the General Court, on a proposal from the Government of the Slovak Republic, by Decision (EU) 2022/1046 of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States (1). An appointment to that post should therefore be made for the period from the date of entry into force of this Decision to 31 August 2028.

| (2) | It has been proposed that the term of office of Ms Beatrix RICZIOVÁ as Judge of the General Court be renewed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It has been proposed that the term of office of Ms Beatrix RICZIOVÁ as Judge of the General Court be renewed.

| (3) | The panel set up under Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given a favourable opinion on the suitability of that candidate to perform the duties of Judge of the General Court, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The panel set up under Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given a favourable opinion on the suitability of that candidate to perform the duties of Judge of the General Court,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Beatrix RICZIOVÁ is hereby appointed Judge of the General Court for the period from the date of entry into force of this Decision to 31 August 2028.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 January 2023.

The President

L. DANIELSSON

---

(1)  Decision (EU) 2022/1046 of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 29 June 2022 appointing Judges to the General Court (OJ L 173, 30.6.2022, p. 77).

1

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Anthony SCOTT.

No. 60768.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 15, 1978.

Thomas J. Ford, Jr., Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., William L. Brockman, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### Paleotectonic investigations of the Pennsylvanian system in the United States, Part III: Plates

By: Edwin D. McKeeEleanor J. Crosby

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp8533

#### Links

- Plates:                               - **Plate 1-1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 1-2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 1-3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 1-4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3A**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3B**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4A**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4B**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5A**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5B**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6A**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6B**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7A**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7B**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8A**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8B**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9A**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 9B**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10A**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10B**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10C**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10D**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10E**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 10F**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 12**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 13**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 14**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 15A**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 15B**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 15C**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 16A**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 16B**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 16C**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 16D**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 16E**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 16F**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 17**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,309
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,585
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,573)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       321
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,688
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,688)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
No. 00-7222.

#### Bland *v.*Oklahoma.

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Niku Corporation (the
Company) for the quarter ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Michael Shahbazian, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and                                        
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                                           |  |                                                    |  |                   
|------------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------
|Signature                                  |  | Title                                              |  | Date              
|                                           |  |                                                    |  |                   
|/s/ Michael Shahbazian

Michael Shahbazian |  | Chief Financial Officer
(Chief Accounting Officer) |  | September 12, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Niku Corporation and will be retained by Niku Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.