alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DSCC’s fight against hunger continues in 2018
 
  By Dana Thornbury
  Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime and the Defense Supply Center Columbus are partnering with the Mid-Ohio Food Bank to help fight hunger in the greater Columbus area. For the past nine years, the installation has provided continuous support to the local food bank aiding half a million people experiencing food insecurity annually in Ohio. “As one of the largest employers in the greater Columbus area, we’re committed to doing our part to help our community,” said DSCC and DLA Land and Maritime Commander Navy Rear Adm. John T. Palmer. “This food drive is just one of the many ways our associates contribute locally to make a positive impact and improve the lives of Ohio families facing the challenges of hunger.” Last year, DSCC associates donated nearly 11,000 pounds of food to the Mid-Ohio food bank serving central Ohio. These efforts supported 183,750 children and 89,250 seniors who receive emergency food each year through the food bank. This year collections will take place every Wednesday during the month of August from
6 – 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. – 1 p.m. at the box truck located in the north parking lot of building 20. **Critical Items**
            Chili with beans
                Canned fruit (juice or light syrup)
                Tuna
                Canned vegetables
                Canned meat
                Soups containing vegetables
                Peanut butter
            **Prohibited Items**
            Glass jars
                Home-made items
                Home-canned items
                Perishables
                Expired items***Items need to have an expiration date of October 2018 or later***Non-Food Critical Items**
            Diapers
                Personal hygiene items
                Pet food An annual event since 2009, FFF is a completely voluntary effort that allows the Federal workforce to directly impact the community where they live and work. Locally, the efforts support more than 525,000 individuals through the Mid-Ohio Food Bank.
December 9, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DONALD WAYNE HEROD, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00911-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 47760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24121]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 10, 20, 25, 71, 101, 170, 171, 312, 314, 511, 514, 
570, 571, 601, 812, and 814

[Docket No. 96N-0057]


National Environmental Policy Act; Revision of Policies and 
Procedures; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a final 
rule that appeared in the Federal Register of July 29, 1997 (62 FR 
40570). The document amended the regulations governing compliance with 
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) as implemented by 
the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). The 
document was published with an error. This document corrects that 
error.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The regulations are effective on August 28, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Office of Information 
Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1472.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 97-19566, appearing on page 40570 
in the Federal Register of Tuesday, July 29, 1997, the following 
correction is made:
     1. On page 40591, in the first column, in the last paragraph, in 
line three, ``OMB Control No. 0910-0332'' is corrected to read ``OMB 
Control No. 0910-0322''.

    Dated: August 25, 1997.
William B. Schultz,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 97-24121 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 4, 2016 

# Order

March 4 , 2016

15 1790 ( 67 )

MARK A. ROSEMAN and LUZATER

ROSEMAN

, Plaintiff s

- Appell ee s

,

v

CITY OF DETROIT

, Defendant,

and

MUKASH PATEL, DENNIS STOKES, and

WILLIAM MCPHERSON

Defendant s

- Appell ant s

. SC: 15 1790

COA: 314650

Wayne CC: 1 1

- 011214

- NO

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Self

- Insurers’

Association to participate as amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted by

that entity on March 2, 2016, is accepted for filing.
#### Robert SANDERS, John Cantry, Lawrence Hudson, Michael Conner and Joshua Berry v. Lev HALL, Jr., and New Orleans Public Service Inc.

No. 8099.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Sept. 8, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 12, 1977.

Writ Refused Dec. 2, 1977.

Gerald P. Aurillo, Metairie, for plaintiffs-appellants.

A. R. Christovich, Jr., New Orleans, for defendants-appellants.

Before GULOTTA, STOULIG and SCHOTT, JJ.

GULOTTA, Judge.

On remand from the Louisiana Supreme Court,1 and on reconsideration of the record *263in this matter involving suspicious similarity of soft tissue injuries and treatment to five plaintiffs occupying the same automobile, as set forth in our earlier decision,2 we are of the opinion that the medical testimony adduced at trial warrants a maximum general damage award of $800.00 to each plaintiff.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court awarding $2,000.00 as general damages to each of the plaintiffs — Robert Sanders, John Cantry, Lawrence Hudson, Michael Conner and Joshua Berry — is reduced to $300.00 to each of the above named parties. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.

*AMENDED AND AFFIRMED.*

1

. *Sanders v. Hall,*347 So.2d 248 (La. 1977). *In re: Lev Hall, Jr. and N. O. Public Service, Inc.*applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. “Writ granted. The case is remanded to the court of appeal for reconsideration in the light of art. 5, Section 10(B), La.Const. and article 1934(3) of the Louisiana Civil Code.”

2

. *Sanders v. Hall,*345 So.2d 590 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1977).

STOULIG, Judge,

concurring.

I concur. The trial judge did find injury as a matter of fact. Appellate courts may only modify the trial court’s factual conclusions where there is manifest error. Conceding that this accident could have produced soft tissue injury, I concur in the award of nominal damages.

SCHOTT, Judge,

concurring.

In compliance with the mandate of the Supreme Court, I have reconsidered the awards for general damage in the light of Art. 5, § 10(B), La.Const. and LSA-C.C. Art. 1934(3), and would adhere to my original opinion that an affirmance of the judgment of the trial court is clearly indicated under *Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.,*341 So.2d 332 (1977). However, the action of the Supreme Court in this case seems tantamount to a reconsideration by that Court of the principles set forth in *Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.*and seems to mandate a reduction in this case.

Accordingly, I concur in the action taken by my colleagues.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GEORGIY SIDIROPULO, :

:

Petitioner : No. 4:05-CV-0894

:

v. : Petition Filed 5/2/05

:

BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND : (Judge Muir)

CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, ET AL., :

:

Respondent :

ORDER

June 24, 2005

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

On May 2, 2005, the Petitioner, Georgiy Sidiropulo,

formerly an inmate at the York County Prison, York, Pennsylvania,

filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 in which he merely challenged his continued confinement by

the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement pending

deportation. Sidiropulo did not challenge the final order of

deportation. Sidiropulo paid the $5.00 filing fee. This case

was assigned to us but referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas M

Blewitt for preliminary consideration. 

On June 2, 2005, Magistrate Judge Blewitt filed a

report in which he recommended that the petition for writ of

habeas corpus be dismissed as moot because Sidiropulo has been

released from custody. Magistrate Judge Blewitt relied on a

document entitled “Notice of Mootness” filed by the Respondents. 

Attached to that document were exhibits indicating that

Sidiropulo was released from custody on May 27, 2005. Those

Case 4:05-cv-00894-MM Document 10 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 3
2

documents include a “Release Notification” dated May 25, 2005,

which was signed by Sidiropulo and an order of supervision

setting forth conditions of release dated May 27, 2005. At the

bottom of the order of supervision is an acknowledgment of the

conditions of release signed by Sidiropulo and dated May 27,

2005. 

Objections to the report of a Magistrate Judge may be

filed within 10 days after the report is served on the parties. 

M.D. Pa. Local Rule 72.31. Neither Sidiropulo nor the

Respondents filed objections to the report of Magistrate Judge

Blewitt. When no objections are filed to the report of a

Magistrate Judge, we need only review that report as we in our

discretion deem appropriate. Thomas vs. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 151-

52 (1985). 

 The impetus for the filing of Sidiropulo's petition,

i.e., his continued detention, no longer exists. We find no

error in Magistrate Judge Blewitt’s report and because Sidiropulo

has been released from custody, we shall adopt it as our own. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The report of Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Blewitt

filed on June 2, 2005, is adopted in toto.

2. Sidiropulo's petition for writ of habeas corpus is

dismissed as moot.

3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.

Case 4:05-cv-00894-MM Document 10 Filed 06/24/05 Page 2 of 3
3

4. The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this order

to Magistrate Judge Blewitt.

 s/Malcolm Muir 

 MUIR, U.S. District Judge

MM:gs

Case 4:05-cv-00894-MM Document 10 Filed 06/24/05 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
International  Development  Corp.  for  the quarter ending February 28, 2006, I,
Betty-Ann  Harland,  Principal  Financial  Officer  of International Development
Corp., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief,  that:

     1.     Such  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter  ending
February 28,  2006,  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.     The  information  contained  in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for  the  quarter  ending  February 28,  2006, fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of International
Development  Corp.

Dated: April 12, 2006.

                                  /s/  Betty-Ann Harland
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                  Betty-Ann Harland, Principal Financial Officer
#### Ex parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL.

77-424.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 21, 1978.

EMBRY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER and ALMON, JJ., concur.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

U.S. ROF III LEGAL TITLE TRUST 2015-1, BY U.S. BANK NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE,

Appellant,

v.

DOROTHY C. GATTERDAM,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3254

[October 11, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Robert Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case No. 56-2010-CA 001004.

Jason F. Joseph of the Tromberg Law Group, P.A., Boca Raton, for 

appellant.

Kendrick Almaguer and Thomas Eross Jr. of The Ticktin Law Group, 

P.L.L.C., Deerfield, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24078]



[[Page 47802]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-346-004]


Equitrans, L.P.; Notice of Proposed Changes In FERC Gas Tariff

September 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 2, 1997, Equitrans, L.P. (Equitrans) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets, with an effective 
date of August 1, 1997:

Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 20
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 21
Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 62
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 67
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 68
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 203A
First Revised Sheet No. 203B
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 262
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 263
Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 264
Substitute Second Revised Sheet No. 266
Substitute Third Revised Sheet No. 267

    Equitrans states that its filing is made in compliance with the 
Commission's Order Accepting and Suspending Tariff Sheets and 
Establishing Hearing issued on July 31, 1997.
    Equitrans states that it includes with its filing primary and 
alternate sets of workpapers supporting the rate levels proposed in 
this docket. Equitrans states that the primary and alternate schedules 
correspond to the primary and alternate tariff sheets included in its 
motion rate filing made with the Commission on August 11, 1997. 
Equitrans states that the primary schedules reflect the recalculation 
of rates based on the return on equity level mandated in the 
Commission's July 31 Order, and that the alternate schedules reflect 
the recalculation of the rates based on the return on equity proposed 
in Equitrans' April 30, 1997 rate filing. Both the primary and 
alternate rate schedules reflect the elimination of Equitrans' proposed 
refunctionalization of facilities in accordance with the July 31 Order.
    Equitrans states that copies of this rate filing were served on 
Equitrans' jurisdictional customers and interested State Commission.
    Any person desiring to protest the filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20046, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests should be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining appropriate action, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24078 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 6, 2011 

y0829 

Order 

 

September 6, 2011 

142720 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142720 

 COA: 301123 

Jackson CC: 06-004505-FC 

ROMMEL RAY REED, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 21, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Innocom Technology Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: November 15, 2010/s/Cheung Wai Hung, EddieCheung Wai Hung, Eddie, Chief Financial Officer
ex-10.3

 Exhibit 10.3
 

 KEY LINK ASSETS CORP.
 NOTE PAYABLE
 $400
 

 September 30, 2015
 Chicago, Illinois
 

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Key Link Assets Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Maker”) promises to pay to the order of Shawn Clark, together with any successors or assigns (collectively, the "Holder"), the principal sum of Four Hundred Dollars  (US $400). The Note is non-interest bearing and bears no collateral.
 

 The Note will be paid in full on June 30, 2017. The Company may redeem the Notes in part, or in full, prior to the due date of the Note. 
 

 Payments of principal shall be made at the place that Holder from time to time shall direct in writing, or, in the absence of direction, at 216 South Jefferson Street, Suite LL, Chicago, Illinois 60661.
 

 Upon a default by the undersigned to make any payment due hereunder, and continuing for five (5) calendar days after notice has been given to the undersigned, and at the option of the Holder, all of the unpaid indebtedness evidenced by this Note shall become immediately due and payable and shall accrue interest at the highest rate of interest then permitted by law.
 

 This Note is submitted by the undersigned to the Holder in Chicago, Illinois and shall be deemed to have been made thereat. This Note shall be governed and controlled by the laws of the State of Illinois as to interpretation, enforcement, validity, construction, effect, choice of law, and in all other respects.
 

 To induce the Holder to accept this Note, the undersigned irrevocably agrees that, subject to the Holder's sole and absolute election, all actions and proceedings in any way, manner or respect arising out of or from or related to this Note shall be litigated in courts having situs within the County of Cook, State of Illinois, the undersigned hereby covenants and submits to the jurisdiction of any local, state or federal court located within said county and state.
 

 Any notice, designation, demand, consent or request required herein to be given or to be served upon the undersigned by the Holder shall be deemed to have been given or served upon mailing, if addressed to the undersigned at 216 South Jefferson Street, Suite LL, Chicago, Illinois 60661, or upon actual receipt by the undersigned.
  
 In the event of default hereunder, the undersigned agrees to pay all expenses, including, without limitation, attorney fees, incurred by the Holder in endeavoring to enforce the rights of Holder hereunder.
 

 Key Link Assets Corp.
 

 

 By:  /s/ Shawn Clark
       Shawn Clark, Chief Executive Officer
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LEE B. MORGAN, : No. 4:CV-05-995

:

Plaintiff : (Judge Jones)

:

v. :

:

LACKAWANNA COUNTY :

COMMUNICATION CENTER, :

:

Defendant. :

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

June 15, 2005

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

In our Order of May 18, 2005, we dismissed Plaintiff Lee B. Morgan’s

(“Plaintiff” or “Morgan”) complaint without prejudice and provided him with

twenty days to file an amended complaint which shall state a federal cause of

action. We stated that if Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within twenty

days that states a federal cause of action, then the Clerk shall close the file on this

case. 

As more than twenty days have elapsed and Plaintiff has failed to file an

amended complaint stating a federal cause of action, the Clerk shall close the file

on this case. 

Case 4:05-cv-00995-JEJ Document 5 Filed 06/15/05 Page 1 of 2
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. As Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint within twenty

days of our May 18, 2005 Order stating a federal cause of action, the

Clerk shall close the file on this case. 

s/ John E. Jones III

 John E. Jones III

United States District Judge

Case 4:05-cv-00995-JEJ Document 5 Filed 06/15/05 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Summary of estimated water use in the United States in
 
2005 | 2010 | 2015
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.127:
Item Number:0621-L (online) | 0671-L (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001062309
 
July 18, 2018**