alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
255 La. 554

#### PONTCHARTRAIN MOTOR COMPANY, Inc. v. Ripoll ROBERT et al.

No. 50384.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 12, 1970.

In re: Pontchartrain Motor Company, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 229 So.2d 458.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsVerification of computer-aided designs of traveling-wave tubes utilizing novel dynamic refocusers and graphite electrodes for the multistage depressed collectorA computational procedure for the design of TWT-refocuser-MDC systems was used to design a short dynamic refocusing system and highly efficient four-stage depressed collector for a 200-W, 8- to 18-GHz, TWT. The computations were carried out with advanced, multidimensional computer programs which model the electron beam as a series of disks of charge and follow their trajectories from the RF input of the TWT, through the slow-wave structure and refocusing section, to their points of impact in the depressed collector. Secondary emission losses in the MDC were treated semi-quantitatively by injecting a representative beam of secondary electrons into the MDC analysis at the point of impact of each primary beam. A comparison of computed and measured TWT and MDC performance showed very good agreement. The electrodes of the MDC were fabricated from a particular form of isotropic graphite that was selected for its low secondary electron yield, ease of machinability, and vacuum properties. This MDC was tested (at CW) for more than 1000 hr with negligible degradation in TWT and MDC performances.Document ID19860004174Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsRamins, P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Kosmahl, H. G.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Force, D. A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Palmer, R. W.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Dayton, J. A., Jr.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1985Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2524NASA-TP-2524E-2566Accession Number86N13643Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-58-22Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860004174.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of KIT digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kaleil Isaza
Tuzman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Date:
      June 23, 2009
                  /s/
      Kaleil Isaza TuzmanKaleil
      Isaza Tuzman
                    Chairman
      and Chief Executive
Officer
MICH EA L ADAMS , Appellant,

v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2390

__________ ___________________/ Opinion filed September 8, 2016. An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Linda F. McCallum , Judge

. Mich ea l Adams , pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorne y General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. The appellant filed a postconviction motion raising three claims. He acknowledges that the notice of appeal is untimely as to the first two claims. In the2 third claim he asserts that the Depar tment of Corrections (“DOC”) is improperly consecutively running the sentence imposed in Duval County case number 16

- 2012

- CF

- 3104 to the sentences imposed in 16

- 2011

- CF

- 3527 , even though he negotiated for con current imposition when he entered his plea in t he 2012 case . He first approached the DOC to address this sentencing structure, and the DOC told
him he needed to obtain a corrected judgment from the lower court in order to have the sentences run concurrently

. The trial court denied the claim without a ny analysis or attachments conclusively refuting it. As there is an October 24, 2012, revised judgment in the record of the 2012 case, stating that the revision was to “Re

- record to reflect concurrent sentence[,]” and which does indeed indicate the 2012 sentence was to be concurrently imposed to the 2011 sentences, we therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to either attach records conclusively refuting the appellant’s claim or to provide this revised judgment to the DOC

.
REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED IN PART , with directions

. WOLF, LEWIS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1548

AN ACT

To provide for the conveyance of certain Forest Service land

to the city of Coffman Cove, Alaska.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coffman Cove Admin5 istrative Site Conveyance Act of 2006’’.

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

7 In this Act:
 †

2

S 1548 ES

1 (1) CITY.—The term ‘‘City’’ means the city of

2 Coffman Cove, Alaska.

3 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means

4 the Secretary of Agriculture.

5 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights,

7 the Secretary shall convey to the City, without consider8 ation and by quitclaim deed all right, title, and interest

9 of the United States, except as provided in subsections (c)

10 and (d), in and to the parcel of National Forest System

11 land described in subsection (b).

12 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—

13 (1) IN GENERAL.—The parcel of National For14 est System land referred to in subsection (a) is the

15 approximately 12 acres of land identified in U.S.

16 Survey 10099, as depicted on the plat entitled ‘‘Sub17 division of U.S. Survey No. 10099’’ and recorded as

18 Plat 2003–1 on January 21, 2003, Petersburg Re19 cording District, Alaska.

20 (2) EXCLUDED LAND.—The parcel of National

21 Forest System land conveyed under subsection (a)

22 does not include the portion of U.S. Survey 10099

23 that is north of the right-of-way for Forest Develop24 ment Road 3030–295 and southeast of Tract CC–

25 8.
†

3

S 1548 ES

1 (c) RIGHT-OF-WAY.—The United States may reserve

2 a right-of-way to provide access to the National Forest

3 System land excluded from the conveyance to the City

4 under subsection (b)(2).

5 (d) REVERSION.—If any portion of the land conveyed

6 under subsection (a) (other than a portion of land sold

7 under subsection (e)) ceases to be used for public pur8 poses, the land shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert

9 to the United States.

10 (e) CONDITIONS ON SUBSEQUENT CONVEYANCES.—

11 If the City sells any portion of the land conveyed to the

12 City under subsection (a)—

13 (1) the amount of consideration for the sale

14 shall reflect fair market value, as determined by an

15 appraisal; and

16 (2) the City shall pay to the Secretary an

17 amount equal to the gross proceeds of the sale,

18 which shall be available, without further appropria19 tion, for the Tongass National Forest.

20 SEC. 4. OFFSETS.

21 (a) GEORGE WASHINGTON BIRTHPLACE NATIONAL

22 MONUMENT EXPANSION.—Section 2 of Public Law 107–

23 354 (16 U.S.C. 442 note) is amended by striking ‘‘or ap24 propriated funds’’.
†

4

S 1548 ES

1 (b) MAGGIE L. WALKER NATIONAL HISTORIC

2 SITE.—Section 511(e)(1) of the National Parks and

3 Recreation Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law

4 95–625) is amended by striking ‘‘$795,000’’ and inserting

5 ‘‘$195,000’’.

Passed the Senate December 7, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1548

AN ACT

To provide for the conveyance of certain Forest

Service land to the city of Coffman Cove, Alaska.
### Ground-water resources of Snohomish County, Washington

By: Reuben Clair Newcomb

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1135

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### Lester Lee LACALLE, Jr. v. ASHY ENTERPRISES et al.

No. 61570.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1978.

In re: Lester Lee Lacalle, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of St. Landry. 353 So.2d 439.

Writ denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1873

ABIGAIL ABBAS; HAIDER ABBAS,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

AMINA ABBAS, minor; FATIMA ABBAS, minor;

HUSSAIN ABBAS, minor,

Plaintiffs,

versus

RANDALL AVRAM, Attorney for Hunton & Williams,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-99-139-5-BO)

Submitted: November 9, 1999 Decided: December 2, 1999

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abigal Abbas, Haider Abbas, Appellants Pro Se. John Brendan Kelly,

Cary, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order dismissing their

action for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Abbas v. Avram, No. CA-99-139-5-BO

(E.D.N.C. May 17, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
# Army general officer named new DLA director 

/ Published May 2, 2017

The U.S. Senate confirmed May 1, Army Maj. Gen. Darrell K. Williams for appointment to the rank of lieutenant general and his next assignment as Director, Defense Logistics Agency, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. He will replace Air Force Lt. Gen. Andy Busch, who retires May 4.

Williams serves as the commanding general of U.S. Army Combined Arms Support Command/Sustainment Center of Excellence at Fort Lee, Virginia. CASCOM is a subordinate command of the Training and Doctrine Command and is a major training center for the Army’s logisticians.

This is the second time Williams has been assigned to DLA. From September 2010 to July 2012, he served as the commander of DLA Land and Maritime in Columbus, Ohio.

His prior assignments include deputy chief of staff for the U.S. Army Materiel Command at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama; director of logistics for Engineering and Security Assistance, at Headquarters, U.S. Pacific Command in Hawaii; executive officer to the Army Deputy Chief of Staff, Washington, D.C.; brigade commander, 3d Sustainment Brigade at Fort Stewart, Georgia; and deputy commander, Coalition Forces Land Component Command at Camp Arifjan, Kuwait, during Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom.

A native of West Palm Beach, Florida, Williams was commissioned into the Army Quartermaster Corps in 1983. He earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in psychology from Hampton Institute, Hampton, Virginia, where he was a distinguished military graduate of the ROTC program. He earned master’s degrees from the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas; National Defense University, Washington, D.C.; and Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania.

Williams’ awards and decorations include the Distinguished Service Medal, Defense Superior Service Medal, Legion of Merit, Bronze Star and others.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2


                                    CONSENT

         Ryder Scott Company hereby consents to references to Ryder Scott
Company as expert and to its reserve reports and to information depicted in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the transition period from July 1, 2000 to
December 31, 2000 for DevX Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation formerly known
as Queen Sand Resources, Inc., that was derived from our reserve reports,
incorporated by reference in the Prospectus constituting a part of the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 and the Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 333-67951) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                        RYDER SCOTT COMPANY

March 30, 2001
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsExperimental and theoretical study of the longitudinal aerodynamic characteristics of delta and double-delta wings at Mach numbers of 1.60, 1.90, and 2.16An experimental and theoretical study was conducted to investigate the supersonic aerodynamic characteristics of delta and double-delta wings. Testing was conducted in the Langley Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel at Mach numbers of 1.60, 1.90, and 2.16. The double-delta wings exhibited lower zero-lift drag values than the delta wings having the same aspect ratio, whereas delta wings provided the lower drag due to lift. Deflections of the trailing-edge flaps for pitch control revealed that the induced aerodynamic forces were only a function of the flap planform and were independent of wing planform. The supporting theoretical analysis showed that the supersonic design and analysis system (SDAS) did not consistently predict all the longitudinal aerodynamic characteristics of the low-sweep, low-fineness-ratio wing-body configurations under investigation.Document ID19850021610Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsWood, R. M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Covell, P. F.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1985Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-2433L-15899NAS 1.60:2433Accession Number85N29922Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-43-23-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19850021610.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Infinex Ventures, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10

QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange

Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael DeRosa, Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 
 

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material

 
 
respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the

Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange

Commission or its staff upon request.

 

/s/

Michael DeRosa

 
Name:  

Michael DeRosa

 
Title:  

Chief Executive Officer and

 
Chief Financial Officer

 
 

Date:  

March 15, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           6,798
<SECURITIES>                                     2,004
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,880
<ALLOWANCES>                                       132
<INVENTORY>                                      1,014
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,038
<PP&E>                                           5,318
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,572
<BONDS>                                            574
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           366
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,740
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,490
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    82
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,483
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,108
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,375
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (351)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,024
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        

</TABLE>
No. 00-7433.

#### Reed *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
# Air Force aims to save $2B, improve lethality with new acquisition approach

/ Published April 26, 2018
JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND, Texas, A new acquisition program has the potential to help the Air Force save $2 billion and make it a more lethal fighting force, Air Force acquisition leaders believe*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center website.*