alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 1057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-246]



[[Page 1057]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs
RIN 1076-AD84

25 CFR Part 151


Land Acquisitions

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a section title in the regulation at 25 
CFR part 151 governing land acquisitions by an Indian individual or 
tribe. The correction eliminates the word ``nongaming'' from the title. 
It is being published to prevent possible confusion over the 
applicability of the rule.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 8, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George T. Skibine, Director, Indian Gaming Management Staff, Office of 
the Commissioner, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Room 2070, Main Interior 
Building, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20240, Telephone No. (202) 
219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On Friday, June 23, 1995, the Bureau of Indian Affairs published a 
final rule on Land Acquisitions, at 60 FR 32874. This rule was amended 
on September 21, 1995, at 60 FR 48894. The rule created a new section 
which contained additional criteria and requirements used by the 
Secretary in evaluating requests for the acquisition of lands by the 
United States in trust for Federally recognized Indian tribes when 
lands are outside and noncontiguous to the tribe's existing reservation 
boundaries.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final rule contains an error that may prove to be 
misleading and is in need of clarification. The word ``(nongaming)'' 
was mistakenly included in the title of Sec. 115.11 and was not removed 
when a correction was published on September 21, 1995. The provisions 
of Sec. 151.11 cover gaming acquisitions, and it was always the intent 
of the Secretary to evaluate off-reservation gaming acquisitions under 
the Sec. 151.11 criteria. Therefore this correction is necessary to 
effect Secretarial intent and remove the word ``(nongaming)'' from the 
title of Sec. 151.11.

List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 151

    Indians--Lands.

    Accordingly, 25 CFR part 151 is corrected by making the following 
correcting amendment:

PART 151--LAND ACQUISITIONS


Sec. 151.11   Off-reservation acquisitions.

    1. In Sec. 151.11, revise the section heading to read as set forth 
above.

    Dated: December 26, 1996.
Elizabeth L. Homer,
Acting Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-246 Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4N-M
#### Richard L. LITT, M.D., Petitioner, v. Dorothy BETSEY and Joseph Betsey, her husband, Respondents. Richard L. LITT, M.D., Appellant, v. Dorothy BETSEY and Joseph Betsey, her husband, Appellees.

Nos. 77-817, 77-818, 77-824 and 77-825.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 29, 1977.

*550Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl and Mark Hicks, Miami, for petitioner/appellant.

Grover, Ciment, Weinstein & Stauber, Miami Beach, and Allan S. Friedman, Miami, for respondents/appellees.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

There have been filed between these parties two petitions for writ of certiorari and two interlocutory appeals. The various orders addressed are as follows:

> Case No. 77-817 — Petition for Writ of Common Law Certiorari or in the Alternative Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition-taken from a March 18, 1977, order granting respondents’ (appellees’) motion to set aside order of dismissal.

> Case No. 77-818 — Petition for Writ of Common Law Certiorari or in the Alternative Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition — taken from an April 12, 1977, order denying petitioner’s (appellant’s) motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (which had been previously granted).

> Case No. 77-824 — Notice of Interlocutory Appeal — taken from the March 18, 1977, order.

> Case No. 77-825 — Notice of Interlocutory Appeal — taken from the April 12, 1977, order.

These matters are consolidated for briefing and oral argument. Having examined the briefs and heard argument, the following actions are taken:

The interlocutory orders, case nos. 77-824 and 77-825, are affirmed.

The petitions for writ of certiorari, case nos. 77-817 and 77-818, are denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

AVERY SOUFFRANT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1182

[August 23, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael Lynch, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 13-242CF10A.

Avery Souffrant, Lake Butler, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, TAYLOR and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
II 

Calendar No. 548 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2054 

[Report No. 109–305] 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of water resources 

in the State of Vermont. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2005 

Mr. JEFFORDS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

JULY 31, 2006 

Reported by Mr. DOMENICI, with an amendment 

[Insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study 

of water resources in the State of Vermont. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VERMONT WATER RESOURCES STUDY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior, act5 ing through the Director of the United States Geological 

6 Survey and in coordination with the State of Vermont, 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 2054 RS

1 shall, in accordance with this Act and any other applicable 

2 law, conduct a study of water resources in the State of 

3 Vermont, including— 

4 (1) a survey of— 

5 (A) with respect to groundwater— 

6 (i) supplies, including aquifers, that 

7 are available for potable use by municipali8 ties in the State; and 

9 (ii) availability, potability, potential to 

10 recharge, and interaction with surface 

11 water; and 

12 (B) potential future water supply sources; 

13 and 

14 (2) a characterization of surface and bedrock 

15 geology, including the effect of that geology on 

16 groundwater yield and quality. 

17 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date 

18 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 

19 the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the 

20 Senate and the Committee on Resources of the House of 

21 Representatives a report describing the results of the 

22 study. 

23 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

24 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec25 essary to carry out this section. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC62 with BILLS

cprice-sewell on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
Calendar No. 548 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2054 

[Report No. 109

–305] 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct 

a study of water resources in the State of Vermont. 

JULY 31, 2006 

Reported with an amendment 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
#### CITY OF MIAMI BEACH v. Alfred I. KASKEL d/b/a Doral Beach Hotel, et al.

No. 38859.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1969.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 13, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 223 So.2d 364.
#### SCOTT v. VANDERGRIFT WILLIAMS FARMS, INC.

No. 39095.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 226 So.2d 897.
# EUR-Lex - 51999AP0168(08) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 51999AP0168(08)

**Legislative resolution embodying Parliament's opinion on the proposal for a Council Regulation fixing the guide prices for wine for the 1999/2000 wine year (COM(99)0038 C4- 0083/99 99/0031(CNS))(Consultation procedure) **

*
Official Journal C 219 , 30/07/1999 P. 0198 *

Proposal for a Council Regulation fixing the guide prices for wine for the 1999/2000 wine year (COM(99)0038 - C4-0083/99 - 99/0031(CNS))

The proposal was approved.

Legislative resolution embodying Parliament's opinion on the proposal for a Council Regulation fixing the guide prices for wine for the 1999/2000 wine year (COM(99)0038 - C4-0083/99 - 99/0031(CNS))(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council COM(99)0038 - 99/0031(CNS)) ((OJ C 59, 1.3.1999, p. 12.)),

- having been consulted by the Council (C4-0083/99),

- having regard to Rule 58 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and of the Committee on External Economic Relations (A4-0168/99),

1. Approves the Commission proposal;

2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament should it intend to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

3. Asks to be consulted again should the Council intend to make substantial modifications to the Commission proposal;

4. Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and Commission.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. George WILSON.

No. 60925.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 15, 1978.

Loyola Law School Clinic, William J. O’Hara, III, Supervising Atty., Philip A. Costa, Student Practitioner, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty . Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty., Brian G. Meissner, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

OCTAVIANO TORRES-NEVAREZ, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 17-0422 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2010-156887-001

The Honorable Dawn M. Bergin, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

APPEARANCES

Octaviano Torres-Nevarez, Florence

Petitioner

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

FILED 1-16-2018
STATE v. TORRES-NEVAREZ

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge James P. Beene, Judge Randall M. Howe and Judge Kent E. 

Cattani delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Octaviano Torres-Nevarez seeks review of the 

superior court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed 

pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is Petitioner’s

third petition for post-conviction relief.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is 

petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 

537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of 

establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion.

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.