alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the report on Form 10-QSB of Planktos Corp. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Russ George, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this Report. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: December 7, 2007  

 

/s/ Russ George

| Russ George |
|-------------|

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

30
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Nathan WRIGHT.

No. 60826.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1977.

In re: Nathan Wright applying for writ of review.

Granted. Conviction set aside, best evidence of permit not produced. See *State v. Batiste,*327 So.2d 420 (La.1976); La.R.S. 15:436.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2475]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), Notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism 
Initial Review Group:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Name of Committee: Clinical and Treatment Subcommittee.
    Dates of Meeting: February 20-21, 1997.
    Time: February 20, 8:30 a.m. to recess, February 21, 8:30 a.m. 
to adjournment.
    Place of Meeting: Hyatt Regency of Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro 
Center, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Elsie D. Taylor, 6000 Executive Blvd. Suite 409, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-7003, 301-443-9787.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.271, Alcohol 
Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 
93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research 
Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; National Institutes of 
Health),

    Dated: January 27, 1997.
Paula N. Hayes,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-2475 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Exhibit 31.1**
**Certification**
I, John D. Doherty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Central Bancorp, Inc.,certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Central Bancorp, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: February 14, 2005      /s/ John D. Doherty       John D. Doherty   Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
NO. 12-10-00201-CR

NO. 12-10-00202-CR

NO. 12-10-00203-CR

NO. 12-10-00204-CR

NO. 12-10-00205-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

'

IN RE: TIMOTHY CARNEL RAINEY,

RELATOR ' ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

'

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Timothy Carnel Rainey complains of a standing order issued by the 

Honorable Christi J. Kennedy, Judge of the 114th Judicial District Court, Smith County, 

Texas, and the Honorable Kerry L. Russell, Judge of the 7th Judicial District Court, also 

in Smith County. Rainey contends that the order was issued “from the Smith County 

Court Collections to order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to collect from [his] 

account trust fund without due process.” He seeks a writ of mandamus compelling either 

judge “to have its findings of fact and conclusions of law filed with the courts clerk, 

separate and apart from its [judgment], and cause its findings and conclusions to be 

served on all the parties.”

A party seeking mandamus relief must generally bring forward all that is 

necessary to establish the claim for relief. See Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 837; In re Pena, 

104 S.W.3d 719, 719 (Tex. App.-Tyler 2003, orig. proceeding); see also TEX. R. APP. P.

52. Therefore, it is Rainey’s burden to provide this court with a sufficient record to 

establish his right to mandamus relief. See Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 837; In re Pena, 104 

S.W.3d 719.

When a petition for writ of mandamus is filed, Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

52.4 requires that it be accompanied by an appendix that includes a certified or sworn 
2

copy of any order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained 

of. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.4(k)(1)(A). Unless voluminous or impracticable, the appendix 

must also include the text or any statute or other law (excluding case law) on which the 

argument is based. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.4(k)(1)(C). Here, Rainey did not file the 

required appendix along with his mandamus petition. Therefore, we are unable to 

determine whether he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, Rainey’s petition for 

writ of mandamus is denied.

 JAMES T. WORTHEN 

 Chief Justice

Opinion delivered June 30, 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

MARC NABI MOGHADAM 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 99 DB 2016 (No. 62 RST 2016) 

Attorney Registration No. 88620 

(Montgomery County) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 25th day of August, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated August 17, 2016, is approved and it is ORDERED 

that Marc Nabi Moghadam, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has never 

been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral 

qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the 

Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the 

Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation 

and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4765-4766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2432]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3659]


Benckiser Consumer Products, Inc.; Prohibited Trade Practices, 
and Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order prohibits, among other things, the 
Connecticut-based company from misrepresenting that a portion of

[[Page 4766]]

the revenue from the sale of any household cleaning products is donated 
to any organization. If the respondent chooses to make such claims in 
the future, the consent order requires the respondent to clearly and 
prominently disclose the method of determining the amount of the 
donation.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued May, 1996.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Carter, Federal Trade Commission, Dallas Regional Office, 1999 
Bryan Street, Suite 2150, Dallas, TX 75201. (214) 979-9350.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Wednesday, March 13, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 61 FR 10347, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Benckiser Consumer Products, 
Inc., for the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties 
were given sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or 
objections regarding the proposed form of the order.
    No comments having been received, the Commission has ordered the 
issuance of the complaint in the form contemplated by the agreement, 
made its jurisdictional findings and entered an order to cease and 
desist, as set forth in the proposed consent agreement, in disposition 
of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2432 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
OSWER/OSRTI Washington, DC 20460



## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL)

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change as additional information is gather ed on the sources and extent of contamination.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regar ding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the A gency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1

- 888

- 42

- ATSDR or 1

- 888

- 422

- 8737. *** Final Site*** March 2011


### DWYER PROPERTY GROUND Elkton, Maryland

WATER PLUME Cecil County

 **Site Location :** 
The Dwyer Property Ground Water Plume (Dwyer) site is a ground water plume with unidentified sources. It is located in a

mixed industrial and residential area in northeastern Maryland. The property is just north of the Town of Elkton

.

 **Site History:**
The Dwyer site is a portion of a former industrial facility , Triumph Explosives, Incorporated, which primarily manufactured incendiary bombs, shells, land mines, grenades, and flares for the Department of Defense fr om the 1930s through the end of

World War II

. From 1946 to 1948, Bowers Battery and Spark Plug Company manufactured carbon batteries at the s ite

. From 1948 to 1958, Aerial Products, Inc orporated , manufactured black powder fireworks at the site. From 1958 to 1972, Mr. Martin Dwyer produced incendiary flares at the site and used the land to graze cattle. The site is currently abandoned

and hea vily overgrown.

 **Site Contamination/Contaminants:**

Th ere are two known plumes that contain levels of trichloroethene (TCE) above EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Act M aximum

C ontaminant L evels (MCLs) for potable water.

 **Potential Impacts on Surrounding Co mmunity/Environment**  **:** The ground water in the area of the Dwyer site is heavily used for drinking water. There are residential and municipal wells located nearby. Also, there is the potential for vapor intrusion in those residences that are located adjace nt to the property and overlying the plumes.

 **Response Activities (to date):**

The M aryland D epartment of the E nvironment (MDE) has completed a remedial investigation o f the property under the State Superfund program.

 **Need for NPL Listing:**

The S tate of Maryland referred th e site to EPA

. Other f ederal and s tate programs were considered but are not viable at this

time. EPA received a l etter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the s tate

. The local government support s listing

.
#### Robert John DYGERT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-939.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 17, 1969.

Robert L. Koeppel, Public Defender, and Michael Oritt, Special Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was informed against by an information containing three counts: (1) uttering a forged instrument; (2) buying, receiving or concealing stolen property; (3) possession of stolen driver’s license. He was tried non-jury and adjudicated guilty on all three counts, and sentenced apparently only on the count of uttering.

On this appeal, the appellant has preserved for review the sufficiency of the evidence to support the convictions on the' three counts, and the trial court’s ruling on the motion to suppress. We find no merit in these contentions. See: Hazen v. Mayo, Fla.1956, 90 So.2d 123; Casso v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 182 So.2d 252; State v. Young, Fla.1968, 217 So.2d 567.

The court, of its own motion, has noted that there is ambiguity in the sentence rendered, being unable to determine whether appellant was sentenced to three years upon conviction on each count to run concurrently, whether he was sentenced to one year on each count to run consecutively, or whether he was only sentenced on the conviction as to the uttering count. Therefore, this matter is réturned to the trial court with instructions to resolve the ambiguity in the sentence rendered on the several adjudications.

Affirmed with instructions.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-8001

SUSAN THOMPSON,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Respondent.

On petitioner for review of a decision of the Bureau of Justice Assistance in PSOB

claim no. 1998-0126.

ON MOTION

Before LINN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Susan Thompson moves for an extension of time, until April 14, 2009, to file her

brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

APR 14 2009	/s/ Jan Horbaly

Date	 Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Susan Thompson

Lauren A. Weeman, Esq.

s20

FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

APR 14 2009

Jwu raUllbALY

CLERK
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 10

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900

Seattle, WA 98101-3140

OFFICE OF 

AIR, WASTE AND TOXICS

March 21, 2012

Subject: Q/d Analysis of BART Sources in Idaho, Oregon and Washington to Establish A 

Threshold for Estimating Visibility Impacts from non-BART Sources

From: Keith Rose, Environmental Scientist

To: File

Using information in EPA’s National Emission Inventory Database, specifically the total annual 

emission rates (Q), and distance in kilometers (d) to the nearest Class I area, I compared the 

visibility impairment in deciviews (dv) determined by CALPUFF modeling for 19 BART 

sources in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington to the Q/d values for these sources. The results, 

shown in the attached spreadsheet, show that all BART sources with a Q/d values of less than 

26.1 dv had a visibility impact of less than 0.5 dv on any Class I area, with an average impact of 

0.32 dv. EPA has conservatively interpreted these results as indicating that non-BART sources 

in the region with Q/d values of less than 20, would likely have visibility impacts less than 0.5 dv 

in the nearest Class I area. 
BART Source Q/D Calpuff dv

TransAlta 507.9 5.6

TESORO 104.5 1.7

La Farge 53.6 3.2

BP Cherry Pt 53.1 0.9

Conoco P 44 0.4

Prort Townsend Paper 38.3 1.2

Weyerhaeuser Longview 33.4 0.9

Intalco 28.4 2.4

Simpson Paper 25.9 0.46

Fort James 24.8 0.4

TASCO Nampa 28.28 1.3

Potlatch 26.13 0.3

TASCO Twin Falls 22.05 0.4

JRSimplot 21.31 0.4

TASCO P 20.93 0.4

NU West 7.62 0.1

Smurfit 21 0.1

TASCO Nyssa 12 0.46

Georgia Pacific Toledo 12 0.2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2003 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2003

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To make permanent the authorization for watershed restoration and 
                        enhancement agreements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Watershed Restoration and 
Enhancement Agreements Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. WATERSHED RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT AGREEMENTS.

    Section 323 of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 1999 (16 U.S.C. 1011 note; Public Law 105-277), is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``each of fiscal years 
        2006 through 2011'' and inserting ``fiscal year 2006 and each 
        fiscal year thereafter'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Applicable Law.--Chapter 63 of title 31, United States Code, 
shall not apply to--
            ``(1) a watershed restoration and enhancement agreement 
        entered into under this section; or
            ``(2) an agreement entered into under the first section of 
        Public Law 94-148 (16 U.S.C. 565a-1).''.

            Passed the Senate December 7, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2003

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To make permanent the authorization for watershed restoration and 
                        enhancement agreements.
```
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1736 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 20, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To provide for the participation of employees in the judicial 

branch in the Federal leave transfer program for disasters and emergencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 1736 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. LEAVE TRANSFER PROGRAM IN DISASTERS 

2 AND EMERGENCIES. 

3 Section 6391 of title 5, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as sub6 section (g); and 

7 (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(f) After consultation with the Administrative Office 

10 of the United States Courts, the Office of Personnel Man11 agement shall provide for the participation of employees 

12 in the judicial branch in any emergency leave transfer pro13 gram under this section.’’. 

Passed the Senate October 19, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.