alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of KIT digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robin Smyth, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(3)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(4)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
      be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing.








Date:
                November 14, 2008
            
            /s/
                Robin SmythRobin
                Smyth
              Chief
                Financial Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert Earl HUSBAND and Eldridge Elvin Payton.

No. 60917.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 31, 1978.

L. Howard McCurdy, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendants-appellants.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE, ex rel. James Henry JACKSON, Plaintiff-Relator, v. SHERIFF OF CADDO PARISH, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 3144.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

April 14, 1970.

James Henry Jackson, in pro per.

Before TATE, FRUGÉ, SAVOY, HOOD, CULPEPPER and MILLER, JJ.

*94PER CURIAM.

The relator, James Henry Jackson files a petition for supervisory relief arising out of his detention under criminal charges in Caddo Parish Jail. However, the Louisiana Courts of Appeal have neither appellate nor original jurisdiction to issue supervisory writs involving the question of confinements arising by reasons of criminal proceedings. State ex rel. Simien v. Sheriff of Calcasieu Parish, La., App. 3 Cir., 186 So.2d 669; State ex rel. Jones v. Sheriff of Calcasieu Parish, La., App. 3 Cir., 185 So.2d 80.

The relator’s application is therefore denied.

Writ denied.
#### Miss Carrie ARMONT v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF the GRAMERCY RECREATION DISTRICT and X. Y. Z. Insurance Company.

No. 9392.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

April 11, 1978.

*359Murray, Murray, Ellis, Braden & Landry W. Glenn Burns, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Schoemann & Golden, Rudolph R. Schoe-mann, New Orleans, for defendants-appel-lees.

Before LEMMON, GULOTTA and BEER, JJ.

GULOTTA, Judge.

This matter is before us on writ of certio-rari.

Plaintiff seeks to “prosecute” her damage suit in forma pauperis. The trial judge denied plaintiff’s motion. In an earlier writ application (No. 8964), filed in response to the trial court’s denial of the motion, we ordered that an evidentiary hearing be held in the trial court on the forma pauperis motion.

The trial judge, after the hearing, denied (a second time) plaintiff’s request to file in forma pauperis. A jury bond was set in the amount of $3,000.00.

In this writ application, plaintiff-relator seeks an order permitting her to file suit in forma pauperis or, alternatively, a reduction in the $3,000.00 jury bond.

In the evidentiary hearing conducted by the trial judge, pursuant to the earlier order issued by this court, plaintiff testified that she was receiving $733.00 per month from Social Security disability payments; that plaintiff’s four children were residing with her in a rent-free residence owned by plaintiff’s family in which she had a one-ninth (1/9) interest; that because of disability, she was unable to be employed. Plaintiff testified further that she owned no automobile and had accumulated no savings. The record is silent as to the ages of the children; however, a neighbor witness testified that she thought the oldest child was 17 years of age and apparently corrected her testimony to state that the child was 24 years of age.

We recognize that a determination of a litigant’s right to file suit in forma pauperis is discretionary with the trial court. LSA-C.C.P. art. 5181. Nevertheless, the evidence considered in the instant case in connection with the recent holding of the Louisiana Supreme Court in *Benjamin v. National Super Markets, Inc.,*351 So.2d 138 (La.1977) leads us to conclude that the trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion to file suit in forma pauperis constitutes an abuse of that discretion.

Accordingly, the trial court’s order denying plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is reversed and set aside. IT IS NOW ORDERED that plaintiff is permitted to prosecute her suit under the provisions of LSA-C.C.P. arts. 5181 et seq. This matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

*REVERSED AND RENDERED.*

BEER, Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent being of the view that the trial court’s denial was not an abuse of discretion.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: DeepSea Coral Research and Technology Program: ... report to Congress.**
 
2012 | 2014 | 2016 | 2018 | 2020
2022
 
SuDoc Number:C 55.357:
Item Number:0609-C-22 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001066496
 
August 8, 2018
254 La. 1106

#### STATE of Louisiana, ex rel. Erlie BOYCE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 50277.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 19, 1969.

In re: Erlie Boyce applying for writ of habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J.,

concurs. Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed. 2d 274, (June 1969) should have only prospective effect.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of KIT digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kaleil Isaza Tuzman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Date: May 10, 2011
/s/ Kaleil Isaza TuzmanKaleil Isaza Tuzman

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
48244 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 178 / Monday, September 15, 1997 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Transmittal No. 97–40]

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense

Security Assistance Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is

publishing the unclassified text of a

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification.

This is published to fulfill the

requirements of section 155 of Public

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.

J. Hurd, DSAA/COMPT/CPD, (703) 604–

6575.

The following is a copy of a letter to

the Speaker of the House of

Representatives, Transmittal 97–40,

with attached transmittal, policy

justification, and sensitivity of

technology pages.

Dated: September 9, 1997.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

BILLING CODE 5000–04–M
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 178 / Monday, September 15, 1997 / Notices 48245
48246 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 178 / Monday, September 15, 1997 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 178 / Monday, September 15, 1997 / Notices 48247
48248 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 178 / Monday, September 15, 1997 / Notices

[FR Doc. 97–24291 Filed 9–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–C
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, L.P. on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Burke, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Corporate Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 16, 2009



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John P. Burke                               
|John P. Burke                                   
|Chief Financial Officer,                        
|Executive Vice President and Corporate Treasurer
|Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, L.P.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1943 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,5-Naphthalenedisulfonic 

acid, 2-[[8-[[4-[[3-[[[2- 

(ethenylsulfonyl)ethyl]amino]carbonyl]phenyl]amino]-6-fluoro-1,3,5- 

triazin-2-yl]amino]-1-hydroxy-3,6-disulfo-2-naphthalenyl]azo]-, 

tetrasodium salt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 1, 2005 

Mrs. LINCOLN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,5- 

Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 2-[[8-[[4-[[3-[[[2- 

(ethenylsulfonyl)ethyl]amino]carbonyl]phenyl]amino]-6- 

fluoro-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-1-hydroxy-3,6-disulfo-2- 

naphthalenyl]azo]-, tetrasodium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 1943 IS 

1 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON 1,5- 

2 NAPHTHALENEDISULFONIC ACID, 3-[[2- 

3 (ACETYLAMINO)-4-[[4-[[2-[2- 

4 (ETHENYLSULFONYL)ETHOXY]ETHYL] 

5 AMINO]-6-FLUORO-1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2- 

6 YL]AMINO]PHENYL]AZO]-, DISODIUM SALT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.48 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

9 by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2009’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

12 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

13 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
### Sediment transport by streams in the Palouse River basin, Washington and Idaho, July 1961-June 1965

By: P. R. Boucher

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1899C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
# L_2023119EN.01015801.xml

| 5.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 119/158 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 119/158

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/916

of 28 April 2023

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Melocotón de Cieza’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Melocotón de Cieza’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Melocotón de Cieza’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Melocotón de Cieza’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Melocotón de Cieza’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Melocotón de Cieza’ (IGP) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 April 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 20, 20.1.2023, p. 21

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
OSWER/OSRTI Washington, DC 20460



## N ATIONA L 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL)

*** Final Site*** May 2014



### PCE SOUTHEAST CONTAM INATION York, Nebraska

York County

 Site Location : The PCE Southeast Contamination site includes the central and southeastern portions of the city of York, Nebraska, which includes an industrial and urban residential area, and a rural residential area just outside of the southeastern portion of the city limits.

 Site History:
Preliminary Assessment and Site Inspection activities have been conducted at the site. The PCE Southeast Contamination site is a ground water plume. The site is composed of documented releases of hazardous substances, mainly volatile organic compounds (VOCs), into soils and ground water. There are many possible sources resulting from various operations such as dry cleaners, metal degreasing operations and grain storage facilities. One municipal water supply well has been contaminated and taken off line. The plume has also contaminat ed three private residential water supply wells, which have

req uired the provision of alternate water.

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:
The ground water plume is comprised of chlorinated solvents, including but not limited to: tetrachloroethene (PCE), trichloroethene (TCE), and their degradation products.

 Potential Impacts on Surr ounding Community/Environment : The ground water plume extends approximately 2 miles . There are several private water supply wells and irrigation wells in danger of becoming contaminated because they are located down-gradient of the ground water plume.

 Response Activities (to date):
There is an ongoing removal action at PCE Southeast Contamination site to provide alternate water to impacted residences.

The EPA has provided alternate water to three residences at the request of the state of Nebraska.

 Ne ed for NPL Listing:
The state of Nebraska referred the site to the EPA because the site requires short-term and long-term response actions and listing will provide for investigation into the nature and extent of contamination and, if necessary, remediation of the site. Other federal and state cleanup programs were evaluated, but are not viable options at this time. The EPA received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the state.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1- 888

- 42 -ATSDR or 1- 888

- 422

- 8737.
****Scheduled Agency Reports and Summaries**USDA Economics and Statistics System July 1998**
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sierra Resource Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Sandra
J.  Andre,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 13, 2008



                                        By: /s/ SANDRA J. ANDRE
                                            ___________________________
                                                Sandra J. Andre
                                                President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Pursuant of 18
U.S.C. 63 1350, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Conmed Healthcare
Management, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that this Form 10-KSB and
the financial statements thereto fully comply with the requirements of Sections
13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the
information contained in the Form 10-KSB and the financial statements thereto
fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

|                 |                                                        
|---------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|March 28,
  2007 |                                                        
|                 |                                                        
|                 | By /s/
  Richard W. Turner                             
|                 | Richard
  Turner, President and Chief Executive Officer

40

---
EXHIBIT 23.1




            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
LeCroy Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-120656, 333-113271, 333-03144 and 333-91833) on Form S-8, (Nos.
333-119730, 333-46418, 333-43690, 333-88239, 333-43699, 333-37269 and 333-22117)
on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-112630 and 333-64848) on Form S-3/A of LeCroy
Corporation of our reports dated September 14, 2005, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of LeCroy Corporation and subsidiaries as of June
30, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended June 30, 2005, and the related financial statement schedule,
management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of June 30, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2005, which reports appear in the June 30,
2005 annual report on Form 10-K of LeCroy Corporation.

Our report dated September 14, 2005, on management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2005, contains an
explanatory paragraph that states that management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and our audit of
internal control over financial reporting of LeCroy Corporation and subsidiaries
excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of an
acquired business, Computer Access Technology Corporation.



/s/ KPMG LLP


Short Hills, New Jersey
September 14, 2005
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Elton Ray PARKER v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 62285.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: Elton Ray Parker, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of West Baton Rouge.

Writ denied.