alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM commander visits Distribution headquarters

/ Published Nov. 17, 2017
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., Army Col. Archie S. Herndon Jr., commander of DLA Central Command and Special Operations Command, visited DLA Distribution headquarters Nov. 7 for an overview of DLA Distribution, and a tour of DLA Distribution Susquehanna’s Eastern Distribution Center, the largest storage facility in the Department of Defense. 
After an office call with Distribution chief of staff Perry Knight, Herndon met with key Distribution staff to receive an organizational overview highlighting DLA Distribution’s global reach extending to over 50 locations aligned across 20 states, eight countries, and all Combatant Commands, with particular focus on gaining an understanding of Distribution’s mission. 

Furthermore, he had a specific interest in forward stock positioning and determining if Distribution had any issues or concerns in his region that he may assist with.  Scott Rosbaugh, director of DLA Distribution Future Plans described Herndon as “DLA Distribution’s regional face to the customers.”

While explaining forward stock positioning, Rosbaugh, clarified it is done through our enterprise business system. “We often send out materials six months in advance to makes sure supplies and equipment are where they need to be.”

Rosbaugh also highlighted the organization’s flexible support. “By utilizing our Expeditionary Team, we can be there when we need to be, but we’re good stewards of taxpayers’ dollars and can get out quickly and efficiently when the mission is complete.”

“The strength of this organization has always been our ability to get everyone together to do parallel planning. A perfect example of this is the sheer volume of the hurricane support and what it took to make that happen,” concluded Knight.

Following the discussion, DLA Distribution Susquehanna commander, Army Col. Brad J. Eungard provided Herndon with a tour of the installation’s Eastern Distribution Center, the largest distribution processing facility in DoD, handling 25 percent of DLA Distribution’s total receipt, storage, and issue of materiel worldwide.

Herndon took command as the new DLA CENTCOM & SOCOM commander during a July 7 change-of-command ceremony at CENTCOM headquarters, MacDill Air Force Base, Florida.
Case 4:05-cr-00263-JEJ Document 14 Filed 08/29/05 Page 1 of 5
Case 4:05-cr-00263-JEJ Document 14 Filed 08/29/05 Page 2 of 5
Case 4:05-cr-00263-JEJ Document 14 Filed 08/29/05 Page 3 of 5
Case 4:05-cr-00263-JEJ Document 14 Filed 08/29/05 Page 4 of 5
Case 4:05-cr-00263-JEJ Document 14 Filed 08/29/05 Page 5 of 5
### Profile surveys of Snoqualmie, Sultan, and Skykomish rivers, Washington

By: Robert Bradford Marshall

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp366

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate- 1**                            (2836 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 1**                            (4235 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 1**                            (3860 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 1**                            (2305 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 2**                            (5768 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 2**                            (5151 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 3**                            (2652 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 3**                            (5821 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 3**                            (3006 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 3**                            (2291 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 3**                            (2514 pdf)                        
  - **Plate- 3**                            (3581 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 347]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ347.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 3944]]

Public Law 110-347
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  101 West Main Street in Waterville, New York, as the ``Cpl. John P. 
      Sigsbee Post Office''. <<NOTE: Oct. 7, 2008 -  [H.R. 5975]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CPL. JOHN P. SIGSBEE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 101 West Main Street in Waterville, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Cpl. John P. Sigsbee Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Cpl. John 
P. Sigsbee Post Office''.

    Approved October 7, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5975 (S. 3317):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            July 8, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 26, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
From: Richard Parker [mailto:richardparkerdc@gmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 1:26 PM 

To: Michael Rivest; GJRosenquist@lbl.gov; Brian Coffey; Matthew Nardotti; Caitlin Johnson; Robert 

Carmichael; Chris Bolduc; Katie Coughlin; Freeman, Jeremiah; Edwards, Brenda; Emily Marchetti 

Subject: Transformer reg-Neg: Status report 

DOE colleagues, 

As the year draws to a close, I thought it might be useful to take stock of where we are 

(or at least my take on where we are) in the transformer reg-neg talk (memo 

attached). I have sent this memo to John Cymbalsky and Dan Cohen previously. 

I regret that we didn't get to yes on liquid immersed, but hopefully the process yielded 

useful information that will help you improve the rule, and I am hopeful that we may 

yet achieve a favorable energy-saving consensus on MVDT and LVDT. 

In any case, it has been a pleasure and honor to have a chance to work with all of you 

this fall. I look forward to wrapping up our business on transformers expeditiously 

and hopefully favorably in the New Year. 

Meanwhile, best wishes to all for a safe and enjoyable holiday season! 

All best,

Richard

This communication is from Navigant Consulting Inc. E-mail text or attachments may contain information 

which is confidential and may also be privileged. This communication is for the exclusive use of the 

intended recipient(s). If you have received this communication in error, please return it with the title 

"received in error" to NCISecurity@navigant.com, and then delete the email and destroy any copies of it. 

In addition, this communication is subject to, and incorporates by reference, additional disclaimers found 

in Navigant Consulting's "Email Disclaimer" section at www.Navigant.com. 

Navigant Consulting, Inc. 

Company Registration Number: UK Ltd. 3641719 

Registered in Delaware, USA 

Registered Office Address: 30 South Wacker Drive, Suite 3400, Chicago, Illinois 60606
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,440,616
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  850,693
<ALLOWANCES>                                    51,336
<INVENTORY>                                  1,196,642
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,554,971
<PP&E>                                       8,248,388
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,160,401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,154,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,365,624
<BONDS>                                      2,622,323
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,296,959
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,216,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,154,952
<SALES>                                      3,341,918
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,341,918
<CGS>                                        2,088,513
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,088,513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               802,020
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                390,381
<INCOME-TAX>                                   171,276
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            219,105
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   219,105
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08


</TABLE>
#### Roy DEES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. HH-473.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 20, 1978.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/defendant seeks review of his conviction for uttering a forged instrument, viz: a check, in violation of § 831.02, Florida Statutes (1975). Prior to closing, the State adduced evidence that the check was drawn on Columbia County Bank, Lake City, Florida, and was deposited in the State Exchange Bank of Lake City, Florida. After the State closed, the defendant moved for acquittal on the ground that venue had not been established. The motion was denied and the court allowed the State to reopen its case to present further evidence on venue. Defendant now urges that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the State to reopen its case to establish venue where his motion for judgment of acquittal was made after the close of the State’s case and was based on the ground that venue had not been proved.

It is well established that the decision of the trial judge allowing a party to reopen its case will not be reversed unless a clear abuse of discretion is shown. See e. g., *Pitts v. State,*185 So.2d 164 (Fla.1966); *Kimmons v. State,*178 So.2d 608 (Fla. 1 DCA 1965); *King v. State,*272 So.2d 821 (Fla. 3 DCA 1973).

Under the facts of this case, we hold that an abuse of discretion has not been demonstrated. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and SMITH, JJ., concur.
Case 4:05-cr-00175-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/24/06 Page 1 of 7
Case 4:05-cr-00175-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/24/06 Page 2 of 7
Case 4:05-cr-00175-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/24/06 Page 3 of 7
Case 4:05-cr-00175-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/24/06 Page 4 of 7
Case 4:05-cr-00175-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/24/06 Page 5 of 7
Case 4:05-cr-00175-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/24/06 Page 6 of 7
Case 4:05-cr-00175-JEJ Document 44 Filed 01/24/06 Page 7 of 7
DuPont Chemicals & Fluoroproducts 

Chestnut Run Plaza 702 1276-E 

4417 Lancaster Pike 

Wilmington, DE 19805 

USA 

Chestnut Run Plaza 702/1276-E, Wilmington, DE 19805

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company

DuPont Chemicals & Fluoroproducts

[CONTAINS CLEAN AIR ACT CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION]

March 21, 2013 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air and Radiation 

Stratospheric Protection Division 

Attention: Margaret Sheppard 

1310 L Street NW, 10th Floor (Room 1029) 

Washington, DC 20005

Dear Ms Sheppard: 

Reference: DuPont SNAP Information Notice 

 (Z)-1,1,1,4,4,4-hexafluoro-but-2-ene (CAS RN 692-49-9) 

[Additional Study for PMN Substance ] 

[Attachment 27 from the original PMN submission (entitled - FEA-1100 Toxicity Testing (CAS 

RN 692-92-2)) has been updated to reflect all toxicity and ecotesting for PMN substance P-11-

0549 to date. 

Please recall in our letter dated 15 September 2013 the following two studies were proposed for 

PMN substance. 

1. 2-generation reproduction study in rats via inhalation 

2. Rabbit developmental study 

It has been determined that a tolerability study will be conducted in order to determine the 

optimal intermediate and high exposure concentrations for the subsequent multigeneration 

reproduction study. Rats will be exposed to concentrations of the PMN substance for 6 

hours per day for 7 days per week. Exposures will continue for approximately 4 weeks. Body 

weights, food consumption, and clinical signs will be measured. 

This study will be conducted at DuPont Haskell Global Centers for Health and Environmental 

Sciences, 1090 Elkton Road, Newark, DE 19714. 

Proposed Experimental Start Date (first day of dosing): 11 February 2013 

Proposed Report Date: 31 May 2013 

Please contact me if you have any questions about this submission or need further clarification. ] 

Sincerely, 

[Helen Walter-Terrinoni 

Global Marketing Manager 

Telephone: 302-999-2442 

Email: helen.a.walter-terrinoni@usa.dupont.com] 

Via Federal Express
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    /s/ Matthew A. JonesName:
    Matthew A. JonesTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    May 17, 2010
Cache River National Wildlife Refuge
Southeast Region

| - Refuge Finder
- Service Finder
- Office Finder
- Contact Finder
- Central Arkansas Refuges    - Cache River NWR
  - Bald Knob NWR
  - Big Lake NWR
  - Holla Bend NWR
  - Logan Cave NWR
  - Wapanocca NWR
- Hunt Season Dates
- Hunting Map
- Directions to Refuge & Map
- Feral Hog Management FAQs
- Ivory Bill Information
- Bird List
- Fact Sheet
- Youth Waterfowl Hunt Infomation | Managed Access
 

Call 870-347-2614 for Daily Permit Availability Office Hours:      7:30am to 4:00pm Monday through Friday

Beginning May 18, 2006 the Managed Access Areas of Cache River NWR will be open for public use without a permit. |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Southeast Region		    Fish & Wildlife ServiceU.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Home PageDepartment of the InteriorUSA.govAbout the U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceAccessibilityPrivacyNoticesDisclaimerFOIA

|  |  |
|--|--|
Do cket No. FAA - 2012 - 1105
-- 

!/, / 

I * 

,: ‘c 

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GROVDR SLLLLRS 

*lro”N.* QLNRAI. 

.:onorabh 3. P. Whltm 

2xlAty Judga 

.cirt.in County 

.Jtacton, TOxa8 

>sar A.rr Gpikllon NO. 0.7ou 

-.iour letter ot 

3x1 this departnent~tte 

:ai1owe: 

that OUT COEL- 

*John T. iipley was Clerk hero for twenty 

y&?&m prmore preoedin% hi8 death rive ysera 

‘~ ac;o. 28 operated thia abatraot firm in the 

'Glork's 0PZios and at tha the or hla death, 

air rife, Sire. Lanorah 3. &~iey, war ap9olnted 

to take his plaoe and she hen continued to 

operatr this fin in thin ofrioe. Ahe is 
;ionorobla 13. 3. White, page 2 

using the County equipment, utllitlaa, and hired 

help that la being paid with the fea from the orfloe 

to do this abatraot work. Pl6066 give us aA opinion 

as to the legality of her operating this firm in 

oonAaotion with her County and Dlstrlot Clark'6 

officei 6Ad also, give ua an opinion on the legality 

of the commissioners' court allowing this 0ffi06 to 

operate in the courthouaa and paying help and furnishing offloa equipment and aup~liaa for the aama.6 

In our @iAiOA No. O-921 we held: 

"The meking of abatraota of title is outside of the 

soope of the offlolal duties of the oounty olerk. The 

pro9ering and copying of field notes mey or mey not be 

carvicaa wlthln the scope of the dutiaa of the office 

cf the oounty olerk; the fact6 in eaoh oese will detmnine this queetion. 

"The oounty olark has AO authority to uaa county 

employees paid by the county to perform sarvioea outaide of the acopa of the duties of the offloe of oounty 

clerk. Labor paid for by the oounty should Aot be ueed 

Sy the clerk in the performenoa of activities outside 

of th6 aoope of the duties of hia ofl'ioe." 

It ?-~a3 held iA the Opinion Of YOAOrabl6 B. F. LOOney t0 

iionorsble J. J. StriOklsAd, dated April 12, 1915: 

"It i6 a matter Of OOJILOOA knowledge that a aOU.rthouse la daaignad for publio use eAd no one should be 

allowed, or permitted, to oooupy It exoept the public 

offioiala Aemed in the statut6.v 

i 

hollowing the reasoning In the foregotig opinion by Eonorable 3, F. Looney and the case of Dodson V. lrlsrahall, 118 S. X. 

(26) 621, writ dismissed, we held in Opinion No. O-178 that the 

Conuaissioners~ Court was without authority to rent or lease 

offices in the courthouse. 

In view of the foregoing it is our OpfniOA that the OOuAty-, 

district clerk CeAAOt legally operate the abstraot plant iA her 

Of?tOQ :or at any other place iA the oourthouse. 

:ie :~OW of Go authority for the Commissioners* Court to 

expend county funds I'or office equipment and supplies t0 be 
. 

-. 

51 

Zonorabl~ B. F. White, pa436 3 

used for purposes other then "county pUrpoaaaw. LlorBovar, we 

know of no authority Sor a oounty offioar to use tees of offloa 

to pay help used by said officer for a purpoaa other than that 

of oarrylng out the dutlae and iUOtiOA8 of the offloe. your 

questions a?a therefore answered in the nagativa. 

Yours vary truly, 

ATTORNLY GCi3NIiW OF lFZA.5 

J2:J.J 

Aa8iStant 

PG John Reeve6
View Systems, Inc.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of View Systems, Inc. certifies (the “Company”) pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  (A) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (B) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:   March 23, 2007  /s/ Gunther Than Gunther Than Chief Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 29, 2016

a0321 

# Order

Clerk March 29, 2016

150860

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150860

COA: 323462

Wayne CC: 11

- 008346

- FC

TERRY DEVONTAY DUMAS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCalculation of viscous effects on transonic flow for oscillating airfoils and comparisons with experimentA method is described for calculating unsteady transonic flow with viscous interaction by coupling a steady integral boundary-layer code with an unsteady, transonic, inviscid small-disturbance computer code in a quasi-steady fashion. Explicit coupling of the equations together with viscous -inviscid iterations at each time step yield converged solutions with computer times about double those required to obtain inviscid solutions. The accuracy and range of applicability of the method are investigated by applying it to four AGARD standard airfoils. The first-harmonic components of both the unsteady pressure distributions and the lift and moment coefficients have been calculated. Comparisons with inviscid calcualtions and experimental data are presented. The results demonstrate that accurate solutions for transonic flows with viscous effects can be obtained for flows involving moderate-strength shock waves.Document ID19870018189Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsHowlett, James T.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Bland, Samuel R.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1987Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-2731L-16289NAS 1.60:2731Accession Number87N27622Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-21-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870018189.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024