alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
70°

69
30°

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH
THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE AND
THE U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

ag

we

1987

ae

Cigna Laser
os

7

WS

Valley

Shublik
Be

op Shublic

—

Sadlerochit

Mountains

Third Range

2

142°

1002 AREA
PLATE 2

A. Porcupine caribou herd concentrated calving and insect-relief areas

B. Central Arctic caribou herd

145° 44°

70°

s H

\

sonaby!

Lake
|

146°

Base from U.S. Geological Survey, scale 1:250,000;
Barter Island, Demarcation Point, and

Flaxman Island, 1955. Limited revision 1983

‘Mt Michelson, 1956. Limited revision 1983,

1

14:

Tage Jaze 146° 1452 144° 143° 142°
C. Muskoxen and riparian areas D. Caribou subsistence-hunting area
EXPLANATION OF FULL-LEASING DATA
Ane peecone {Data from figure V-1, this report]
a3 + 0 30 an 5 Ba es Possible facilities Possible facilities
) Central production facility + Airstrip—30 or 130 acres
10 0 10 20 30 40 50 KILOMETERS. * 0 acres Het et
= 1 o 40 acres —-----—— Connecting road
Drill pad a Seawater-treatment plant
e 23 acres ° Port facility
———— Pipeline B Assessment block discussed in text

MAPS OF CARIBOU AND MUSKOXEN RESOURCES IN THE 1002 AREA, ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, ALASKA
Compiled by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCombustion performance and heat transfer characterization of LOX/hydrocarbon type propellants, volume 1A program to evaluate liquid oxygen and various hydrocarbon fuel as low cost alternative propellants suitable for future space transportation system applications is discussed. The emphasis of the program is directed toward low earth orbit maneuvering engine and reaction control engine systems. The feasibility of regeneratively cooling an orbit maneuvering thruster was analytically determined over a range of operating conditions from 100 to 1000 psia chamber pressure and 1000 to 10,000-1bF thrust, and specific design points were analyzed in detail for propane, methane, RP-1, ammonia, and ethanol; similar design point studies were performed for a filmcooled reaction control thruster. Heat transfer characteristics of propate were experimentally evaluated in heated tube tests. Forced convection heat transfer coefficients were determined over the range of fluid conditions encompassed by 450 to 1800 psia, -250 to +250 F, and 50 to 150 ft/sec, with wall temperatures from ambient to 1200 F. Seventy-seven hot firing tests were conducted with LOX/propane and LOC/ethanol, for a total duration of nearly 1400 seconds, using both heat sink and water-cooled calorimetric chambers.Document ID19840003251Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsMichel, R. W.*(Aerojet Liquid Rocket Co. Sacramento, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1983Subject CategoryPropellants And FuelsReport/Patent NumberREPT-15958-MA-129T-003F-VOL-1NASA-CR-171713NAS 1.26:171713Accession Number84N11319Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-15958Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840003251.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46493]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23454]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[OPP-00473B; FRL-5744-1]


Antimicrobial Rule Development; Cancellation of Antimicrobial 
Stakeholder Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Cancellation of a meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Antimicrobials Division (AD) of the Office of Pesticide 
Programs of EPA announced a series of stakeholder meetings in the 
Federal Register of July 9, 1997 to obtain views about the 
antimicrobial rule that is being developed. The meeting scheduled for 
September 11, 1997, is cancelled.

DATES: The stakeholder meeting announced for Thursday, September 11, 
1997, is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Barbara Mandula, 
Antimicrobials Division (7510W), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460; Office location, telephone, fax, 
and e-mail address: Sixth Floor, Crystal Station #1, 2800 Crystal 
Drive, Arlington, VA, 703-308-7378; fax: 703-308-8481; e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#630e020d07160f024d01021101021102230613020e020a0f4d0613024d040c15"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95f8f4fbf1e0f9f4bbf7f4e7f7f4e7f4d5f0e5f4f8f4fcf9bbf0e5f4bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA announced in the Federal Register of 
July 9, 1997 (62 FR 36805) (FRL-5731-2), a series of stakeholder 
meetings to be held in Rm. 1126 (``Fishbowl''), Crystal Mall #2, 1921 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Va. The meeting scheduled for 
September 11, 1997, is cancelled because the documents that would have 
been the major agenda items will not be ready in time. The documents 
are expected to be ready for discussion at the next stakeholder 
meeting, which is scheduled to be held on October 21, 1997.

List of Subjects.

    Environmental protection.

    Dated: August 28, 1997.

Frank Sanders,
Director, Antimicrobials Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 97-23454 Filed 9-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Pa. executive AG emphasizes education during Hispanic Heritage event

/ Published Oct. 13, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 
The executive attorney general for Pennsylvania spoke to the Naval Support Activity Philadelphia workforce about the importance of education during the Hispanic Heritage Month program Oct. 10.

Sara Manzano-Díaz, who was born in New York to a Puerto Rican family, spoke about how persevering through school led to a career in government and law.

Her mother never had the chance to get a formal education and couldn’t write her name. When she had to sign documents, she could only mark it with an ‘X,’ Manzano-Díaz said.

“When we were living in New York, there was a program to teach people how to read and write,” Manzano-Díaz said. “She learned how to write her name, and she was so proud because that was the thing that she wanted to do her whole life.”

The value of education was important to Manzano-Díaz’s Spanish-speaking parents. She often translated between Spanish and English for her family and advocated on their behalf. She internalized those early experiences to become a lawyer and said that education is a pathway for Latino people to improve their lives.

“Education is something that no one can take from you,” she said.

Echoing Manzano-Díaz’s remarks on the importance of education, Michelle Nieves, career development branch chief at the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, said that it was important to keep learning and developing professional skills.

“My parents stressed that education is an important thing,” Nieves said. “It’s important for our future to help educate Hispanics and Latinos so they can be prosperous.”

The Hispanic Heritage program was sponsored by the DLA Troop Support Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity Office Advisory Committee.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1887 

To authorize the conduct of small projects for the rehabilitation or removal 

of dams. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2005 

Mr. KERRY (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, and Mr. JEFFORDS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To authorize the conduct of small projects for the 

rehabilitation or removal of dams. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SMALL PROJECTS FOR THE REHABILITATION 

4 OR REMOVAL OF DAMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army (re6 ferred to in this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’) may carry 

7 out a small dam removal or rehabilitation project, includ8 ing a project relating to a privately-owned dam that does 

9 not generate hydropower, if the Secretary determines that 
2 

•S 1887 IS

1 the project will enhance public safety or improve the qual2 ity of the environment, or is in the public interest. 

3 (b) COST SHARING.—A non-Federal interest shall 

4 provide 35 percent of the cost of the removal or remedi5 ation of any project carried out under this section, includ6 ing provision of all land, easements, rights-of-way, and 

7 necessary relocations. 

8 (c) AGREEMENTS.—Construction of a project under 

9 this section shall be commenced only after a non-Federal 

10 interest has entered into a binding agreement with the 

11 Secretary to pay— 

12 (1) the non-Federal share of the costs of con13 struction required by this section; and 

14 (2) 100 percent of any operation and mainte15 nance costs. 

16 (d) COST LIMITATION.—Not more than $5,000,000 

17 in Federal funds may be allotted under this section for 

18 a project at any single location. 

19 (e) FUNDING.—There is authorized to be appro20 priated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for each fis21 cal year. 

Æ
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 Nos. 333-87248, 333-80537 and 333-88183) pertaining to Dave & Buster's Inc.
1995 Stock Option Plan and Employee 401(k) Savings Plan of our report dated
March 21, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Dave &
Buster's, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
February 2, 2003.


                                                               Ernst & Young LLP


Dallas, Texas

April 25, 2003
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1961

AN ACT

To extend and expand the Child Safety Pilot Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Extending the Child

5 Safety Pilot Program Act of 2005’’.
 †

2

S 1961 ES

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE CHILD SAFETY PILOT PRO2 GRAM.

3 Section 108 of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 5119a

4 note) is amended—

5 (1) in subsection (a)—

6 (A) in paragraph (2)(B), by striking ‘‘A

7 volunteer organization in a participating State

8 may not submit background check requests

9 under paragraph (3).’’;

10 (B) in paragraph (3)—

11 (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking

12 ‘‘a 30-month’’ and inserting: ‘‘a 60-

13 month’’;

14 (ii) by striking subparagraph (B) and

15 inserting the following:

16 ‘‘(B) PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS.—

17 ‘‘(i) ELIGIBLE ORGANIZATIONS.—Eli18 gible organizations include—

19 ‘‘(I) the Boys and Girls Clubs of

20 America;

21 ‘‘(II) the MENTOR/National

22 Mentoring Partnership;

23 ‘‘(III) the National Council of

24 Youth Sports; and

25 ‘‘(IV) any nonprofit organization

26 that provides care, as that term is de-
†

3

S 1961 ES

1 fined in section 5 of the National

2 Child Protection Act of 1993 (42

3 U.S.C. 5119c), for children.

4 ‘‘(ii) PILOT PROGRAM.—The eligibility

5 of an organization described in clause

6 (i)(IV) to participate in the pilot program

7 established under this section shall be de8 termined by the National Center for Miss9 ing and Exploited Children according to

10 criteria established by such Center, includ11 ing the potential number of applicants and

12 suitability of the organization to the intent

13 of this section.’’;

14 (iii) by striking subparagraph (C) and

15 inserting the following:

16 ‘‘(C) APPLICANTS FROM PARTICIPATING

17 ORGANIZATIONS.—Participating organizations

18 may request background checks on applicants

19 for positions as volunteers and employees who

20 will be working with children or supervising vol21 unteers.’’;

22 (iv) in subparagraph (D), by striking

23 ‘‘the organizations described in subpara24 graph (C)’’ and inserting ‘‘participating or25 ganizations’’; and
†

4

S 1961 ES

1 (v) in subparagraph (F), by striking

2 ‘‘14 business days’’ and inserting ‘‘10 busi3 ness days’’; and

4 (2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘and 2005’’

5 and inserting ‘‘through 2008’’.

Passed the Senate November 18, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1961

AN ACT

To extend and expand the Child Safety Pilot

Program.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24159]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #2980]


State of Minnesota

    As a result of the President's major disaster declaration on August 
25, 1997, I find that Anoka, Hennepin, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Ramsey, 
Sherburne, and Wright Counties in the State of Minnesota constitute a 
disaster area due to damages caused by severe storms, high winds, 
tornadoes, and flooding which occurred June 28-July 27, 1997. 
Applications for loans for physical damages may be filed until the 
close of business on October 25, 1997, and for loans for economic 
injury until the close of business on May 26, 1998, at the address 
listed below or other locally announced locations: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One Baltimore Place, Suite 300, 
Atlanta, GA 30308.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the following contiguous counties in Minnesota 
may be filed until the specified date at the above location: Benton, 
Carver, Chippewa, Chisago, Dakota, Kanabec, McLeod, Meeker, Mille Lacs, 
Pine, Pope, Renville, Scott, Stearns, Swift, and Washington.

Physical damage:                                                 Percent
  Homeowners with credit available elsewhere...............        8.000
  Homeowners without credit available elsewhere............        4.000
  Businesses with credit available elsewhere...............        8.000
  Businesses and non-profit organizations without credit                
   available elsewhere.....................................        4.000
  Others (including non-profit organizations) with credit               
   available elsewhere.....................................        7.250
For Economic Injury:                                                    
  Businesses and small agricultural cooperatives without                
   credit available elsewhere..............................        4.000
                                                                        

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 298011 
and for economic injury the number is 958200.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: September 4, 1997.
Bernard Kulik,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-24159 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48339-48340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24320]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

September 4, 1997
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

[[Page 48340]]

Special Request

    In order to conduct the survey described below during September-
October 1997, the Department of the Treasury is requesting that the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and approve this 
information collection by September 16, 1997. To obtain a copy of this 
study, please contact the Internal Revenue Service Clearance Officer at 
the address listed below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1349.
    Project Number: SOI-33.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: 1997 View Debit Application Customer Satisfaction Survey.
    Description: The Internal Revenue Service has developed the 
automated View Debit Telephone Application. The application allows 
taxpayers to hear a summary of detailed information pertaining to their 
individual tax collection account interactively, without customer 
service representative (CSR) involvement. The purpose of the survey is 
to assess the level of ease and satisfaction with using the View Debit 
application.
    Respondents: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1260.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Response: 1 minute.
    Frequency of Response: Other (one-time only).
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 21 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-24320 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 MERLIN E. WALBORN, 2 Worker-Appellee, 3
v. NO. 29,283 4 ULTIMATE MASONRY, 5 Defendant-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINSTRATION 7 Victor Lopez, Workers’ Compensation Judge 8 Victor Titus 9 Farmington, NM 10 for Appellee 11 Lorenzo Brown 12 Farmington, NM 87402 13 for Pro Se Employer/Appellant 14 for Appellant 15
MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 KENNEDY, Judge. 17 Employer is appealing from a compensation order entered in a case involving 18 the uninsured employers fund. We issued a calendar notice proposing to affirm and 19 Employer has responded with a memorandum in opposition. We affirm. 202 In its memorandum in opposition, Empl oyer continues to claim that the 1 Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) abusedits discretion in extending the time for 2 Worker to file his response to the reque sts for admissions. Specifically, Employer is 3 claiming that the Rules of Civil Procedure should be enforced. However, discovery 4 orders are generally reviewed for abuse of discretion. See Pub. Serv. Co. of N.M. v. 5 Lyons , 2000-NMCA-077, ¶ 10, 129 N.M. 487, 10 P. 3d 166. More to the point, the 6 rule applicable here provides authority for this as well. Rule 1-036(A) NMRA (“The 7 matter is admitted unless, within thirty (30) days after service of the request, or within 8 such shorter or longer time as the court may allow . . . .”). Depending on whether the 9 three day waiting period applied to Worker’s response, it was either one or four days 10 late. [DS 3; MIO 1] In light of the limited extent of the violation here, we are not 11 inclined to say that the WCJ’s ruling amounted to an abuse of discretion. See Sims v. 12 Sims , 1996-NMSC-078, ¶ 65, 122 N.M. 618, 930 P.2d 153 (“An abuse of discretion 13 occurs when a ruling is clearly contrary to the logical conclusions demanded by the 14 facts and circumstances of the cas e.”). Accordingly, we affirm. 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16

___________________________________ 17 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge 183 WE CONCUR : 1

___________________________ 2 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 3

___________________________ 4 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 5
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 210 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 210

                   For the relief of Renato Rosetti.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2005

  Mr. Coburn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Renato Rosetti.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Renato Rosetti 
shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 
United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Renato Rosetti as 
provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by one number during the current fiscal year the 
total number of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
#### Leroy HESTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1113.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 18, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Kurt Mamar, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*482Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON, J., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was adjudged guilty after a jury verdict of trespass. On this appeal, he claims error upon the admission of his confession without a specific finding by the court that the confession was voluntarily given. See *McDole v. State,*283 So.2d 553 (Fla.1973). Error is not presented for the reasons set out in *Wilson v. State,*304 So.2d 119 (Fla.1974). See also *Von Horn v. State,*334 So.2d 43 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

A second point as to the scope of cross-examination does not present error.

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION


1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION


906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





CERTIFICATION OF SOLE REMAINING OFFICER-DIRECTOR





In connection with this Quarterly Report of GYK Ventures, Inc. , a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-QSB for June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dan Sifford, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Table On Dated: August 11, 2004




/s/J. Dan SiffordJ. Dan Sifford
secretary/director