alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23590]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE AGREEMENTS


Consolidation and Amendment of Export Visa Requirements to 
Include the Electronic Visa Information System for Certain Cotton, 
Wool, Man-Made Fiber, Silk Blend and Other Vegetable Fiber Textiles and 
Textile Products Produced or Manufactured in the Philippines; 
Correction

August 29, 1997.
    In a notice document published in the Federal Register on August 
18, 1997 (62 FR 43993) beginning on page 43993, make the following 
corrections in the letter to the Commissioner of Customs:
    1. Third column, 2nd paragraph of letter, line 19, add ``200-239.''
    2. Third column, 2nd paragraph of letter, line 21, delete ``(but 
not Categories 355, 356, 655, 656, 455, 371 and 671).''
    3. First column on page 43994, end of last paragraph of letter, add 
``A replacement visa may be issued by the Embassy of the Philippines in 
Washington, DC.''
Troy H. Cribb,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. 97-23590 Filed 9-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24298]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM


Notice of Publication

SUMMARY: Federal Telecommunications Recommendation (FTR) 1070-1997, 
``Detail Specification for 62.5-<greek-m>m Core Diameter/125-<greek-m>m 
Cladding Diameter Class 1a Multimode, Graded Index Optical Waveguide 
Fibers'' was approved for publication on September 2, 1997. This 
recommendation defines the optical, geometrical, environmental, and 
mechanical specifications for glass multimode optical waveguide fibers. 
This recommendation is based on ANSI/EIA/TIA-492AAAA-1989 (FIPS PUB 
159).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Dennis Bodson at telephone 
(703) 607-6200 or write to the National Communications System, Attn: 
N6, 701 South Court House Road, Arlington VA 22204-2198.
Dennis Bodson,
Chief, Technology and Standards Division.
[FR Doc. 97-24298 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-03-M
# Journal officiel C 83I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0936 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l’Union européenne | C 083I |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 64e année12 mars 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0936

Journal officiel

de l’Union européenne

C 083I

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

64e année12 mars 2021

---

| Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informations |
| | INFORMATIONS PROVENANT DES ÉTATS MEMBRES |
| 2021/C 83 I/01 | Informations communiquées par les États membres concernant la fermeture de pêcheries | 1 |

Sommaire

page

IV   Informations

INFORMATIONS PROVENANT DES ÉTATS MEMBRES

2021/C 83 I/01

Informations communiquées par les États membres concernant la fermeture de pêcheries

1

---

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

IV Informations

INFORMATIONS PROVENANT DES ÉTATS MEMBRES

| 12.3.2021 | FR | Journal officiel de l’Union européenne | CI 83/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2021

FR

Journal officiel de l’Union européenne

CI 83/1

---

Informations communiquées par les États membres concernant la fermeture de pêcheries

(2021/C 83 I/01)

Conformément à l’article 35, paragraphe 3, du règlement (CE) no 1224/2009 du Conseil du 20 novembre 2009 instituant un régime de l’Union de contrôle afin d’assurer le respect des règles de la politique commune de la pêche (1), une décision de fermer la pêcherie a été prise telle que décrite dans le tableau ci-après:

| Date et heure de la fermeture | 24.12.2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Durée | 24.12.2020 - 31.12.2020 |
| État membre | Portugal |
| Stock ou groupe de stocks | ALB/AN05N |
| Espèce | Germon du Nord (Thunnus alalunga) |
| Zone | Océan Atlantique, au nord de 5° N |
| Type(s) de navires de pêche | --- |
| Numéro de référence | 40/TQ123 |

Date et heure de la fermeture

24.12.2020

Durée

24.12.2020 - 31.12.2020

État membre

Portugal

Stock ou groupe de stocks

ALB/AN05N

Espèce

Germon du Nord (Thunnus alalunga)

Zone

Océan Atlantique, au nord de 5° N

Type(s) de navires de pêche

---

Numéro de référence

40/TQ123

---

(1)  JO L 343 du 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1129-1130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-229]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AZ-910-0777-612-241A]


State of Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting, notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Arizona Resource 
Advisory Council. The meeting will be held January 31, 1997, beginning 
at 10:00 a.m. in the 1A Conference Room at the Bureau of Land 
Management

[[Page 1130]]

Arizona State Office, 222 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona. The 
agenda items to be covered at the one-day business meeting include 
review of previous meeting minutes, and review and evaluation of 
incoming public comments on the Standards and Guidelines Statewide Plan 
Amendment. A public comment period will take place at 11:30 a.m. 
January 31, 1997 for any interested publics who wish to address the 
Council.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Stevens or Ken Mahoney Bureau of Land Management, Arizona State 
Office, 222 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2203, (602) 
417-9512.
Terrance P. O'Sullivan,
Acting Deputy State Director, Resource Planning, Use and Protection 
Division.
[FR Doc. 97-229 Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-M
No. 00-7325.

#### Gonzales *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### Fw: suggest edits on new paragraph Lydia Wegman to: Tricia Crabtree, Ron Evans 06/02/2010 04:59 PM

----- Forwarded by Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US on 06/02/2010 04:59 PM -----

From: "Laity, James A." <James

_ A.

_ Laity@omb.eop.gov> To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 06/02/2010 04:57 PM Subject: FW: suggest edits on new paragraph



### Generally looks good. A few minor suggestions.

From: Schwab, Margo Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 4:42 PM To: Laity, James A.; Mancini, Dominic J. Subject: suggest edits on new paragraph
AFS-11-237-E April 22, 2011 Exemption No. 9901A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0592

Sheryl R. Israel, Esq. Counsel for Republic Airline, Inc. Hogan Lovells US, LLP 555 Thirteenth Street, NW. Washington, DC 200004

Dear Ms. Israel:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9901. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated March 30, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Republic Airline, Inc. (Republic), for an extension of Exemption No. 9901. That exemption from § 121.291(b)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Republic to operate the Embraer ERJ-190 without conducting a partial evacuation demonstration.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Republic.

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9901 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.2

Conditions and Limitations

1. Republic shall not change the number, location, or emergency evacuation procedures or duties of required flight attendants from that demonstrated on the ERJ-170.

2. Republic shall not change the number, location, type of, or operating mechanisms of the installed emergency exits.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 9901 to July 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bruce W. SHANNON.

No. 61516.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1978.

Ferdinand J. Kleppner, Grisbaum *&*Kleppner, Metairie, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., William L. Brockman, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Bruce W. Shannon was charged by bill of information with the crime of attempted second degree murder. La.R.S. 14:27; La. R.S. 14:30.1. After trial by jury, he was found guilty as charged and was sentenced to serve forty years at hard labor. Credit was given toward service of his sentence for time spent in actual custody prior to *194imposition of sentence. On defendant’s timely filed motion, the trial judge ordered an appeal. La.Code Crim.P. art. 916 provides that the jurisdiction of the trial court is divested and that of the appellate court attaches, upon the entering of the order of appeal, and thereafter the trial court has no jurisdiction over the matter except for certain listed actions not applicable here.

After the trial judge had ordered an appeal, defendant timely filed in the trial court, pursuant to La.Code Crim.P. art. 851(3), a motion for a new trial based upon allegations of new and material evidence that, notwithstanding the exercise of reasonable diligence by defendant, was not discovered before or during trial, which evidence, if available, allegedly would probably have changed the verdict of guilty.

La.Code Crim.P. art. 853 provides in pertinent part:

> 

> When the motion for a new trial is based on ground (3) of Article 851, the motion may be filed within one year after verdict or judgment of the trial court, although a sentence has been imposed or a motion for a new trial has been previously filed; *but if an appeal is pending the court may hear the motion only on remand of the case.*(Emphasis added.)

In accordance with the above provision, we remand the case to the trial court for a hearing on defendant’s motion for a new trial. *State v. Perry,*351 So.2d 1201 (La.1977); *State v. Bradford,*275 So.2d 407 (La.1973).

It is ordered that the case be remanded to the trial court for a hearing on defendant’s motion for a new trial.

SUMMERS, J., dissents.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Alternate Energy Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 31, 2008 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |     |                        
|----------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------
|Date: November 13, 2008 |  |     | Alternate Energy Corp. 
|                        |  |     |                        
|                        |  | By: | /s/ Blaine Froats      
|                        |  |     | Blaine Froats          
|                        |  |     | Chief Executive Officer



|                        |  |     |                                           
|----------------------- |  | --- | ------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2008 |  |     | Alternate Energy Corp.                    
|                        |  |     |                                           
|                        |  | By: | /s/ Jack Wasserman                        
|                        |  |     | Jack Wasserman                            
|                        |  |     | Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer







3
Ardell Nelson, Jr.  From the 47th District Court Appellant Of Potter County v. No. 07-06-00100-CV  May 25, 2006 Joe Nunn, et al  Opinion by Justice Campbell Appellee JUDGMENT Pursuant to the opinion of the Court, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that this appeal be dismissed. It is further ordered that appellant pay a ll costs in this behalf expended for which
let execution issue. It is further ordered that this decis ion be certified below for observance. o O o
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alex Werber, the Chief Financial Officer of Tissera, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
      ended January 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated: March 8, 2005


                                          By: /s/Alex Werber
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Name: Alex Werber
                                          Title: Chief Financial Officer
# L_2014293DE.01005901.xml

| 9.10.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 293/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 293/59

---

Berichtigung der Regelung Nr. 131 der Wirtschaftskommission der Vereinten Nationen für Europa (UNECE) — Einheitliche Bedingungen für die Genehmigung von Kraftfahrzeugen hinsichtlich des Notbremsassistenzsystems (AEBS)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 214 vom 19. Juli 2014
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 214 vom 19. Juli 2014

Auf Seite 58, Anhang 3, ANFORDERUNGEN FÜR DIE WARN- UND AKTIVIERUNGSPRÜFUNG — WERTE FÜR BESTEHEN/NICHTBESTEHEN, Spalte D, in der Zeile, die mit der Formel M3(1), N2 > 8t und N3 anfängt:

3

1

2

3

anstatt:

„Mindestens 10 km/h“

muss es heißen:

„Mindestens 20 km/h“

.

Auf Seite 58, Anhang 3, ANFORDERUNGEN FÜR DIE WARN- UND AKTIVIERUNGSPRÜFUNG — WERTE FÜR BESTEHEN/NICHTBESTEHEN, Spalte H, in der Zeile, die mit der Formel M3(1), N2 > 8t und N3 anfängt:

3

1

2

3

anstatt:

„32 ±2 km/h“

muss es heißen:

„12 ±2 km/h“

.

---
Order entered April 20 , 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00273

- CV

TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY, L.L.P., Appellant

V.

ANGELA M. CARPENTER, Appellee

On Appea l from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. Dc

- 17

- 04230



### O RDER

T he reporter’s record in this accelerated appeal is overdue. By postcard dated March 21,

2018, we notified Court Reporter Vielica Dobbins the reporter ’s record was overdue. We

directed Ms. Dobbins to file the reporter’s record within ten days. To date, the reporter’s record

has not been filed.

Accordingly, we ORDER Vielica Dobbins, Official Court Reporter for the 134th Judicial

District Court, to fi le, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order either (1) the reporter’s record;

(2) written verification no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant ha s

paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record. 1 We notify appellant th at if we receive

1 The docketing sheet filed by appellant in this case indicat es the reporter’s record was requested on March 9, 2018 and

that payment arrangements were made.verification the reporter’s record has not been requested or that it has not been paid for , we may

order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to :

Honorable Dale Tillery

Presiding Judge

134th Judicial District Court

Vielica Dobbins

Official Court Reporter

134th Judicial District Court

All parties

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### STATE of Louisiana v. McArthur JOHNSON.

No. 62335.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: McArthur Johnson applying for writ of habeas corpus. Bossier Parish.

Denied.

DIXON, J.,

concurs: If the offense occurred before the 1975 amendment to the attempt article the maximum penalty is 20 years. If the offense occurred after the 1975 amendment, the maximum penalty is 50 years.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1704 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the taking of property by eminent 

domain for economic development. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2005 

Mr. DORGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for the taking of 

property by eminent domain for economic development. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS IN 

4 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT RELATING TO 

5 PROPERTY TAKEN BY EMINENT DOMAIN. 

6 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

7 ‘‘Private Property Protection Act of 2005’’. 

8 (b) PROHIBITION.— 
2 

•S 1704 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—No Federal funds may be 

2 used relating to a property that is the subject of a 

3 taking by eminent domain. 

4 (2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not 

5 apply if the property is being used for public use or 

6 a public purpose. 

7 (c) PUBLIC USE OR PUBLIC PURPOSE.—Economic 

8 development, including an increase in the tax base, tax 

9 revenues, or employment, may not be the primary basis 

10 for establishing a public use or public purpose under sub11 section (b). 

12 (d) TAKINGS FOR USE BY PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL OR

13 ENTITY.—Subsection (b) shall include takings of private 

14 property for the use of, or ownership by, any private indi15 vidual or entity. 

Æ
Exhibit 10.1



Summary of 2005 Executive Officer Base Salaries



The following is a summary of the 2005 base salaries established for the executive officers of Adolor Corporation. For additional
information regarding the compensation of the Companys executive officers, please refer to the Companys Proxy Statement relating to the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004.



|                                                                           |  |                  |        
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | -------
|Name and Principal Position                                                |  | 2005 Base Salary
|Bruce A. Peacock                                                           |  | $                | 399,500
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director                            |  |                  |        
|                                                                           | 
|David Jackson                                                              |  | $                | 348,150
|Senior Vice President, Research & Development                              |  |                  |        
|                                                                           | 
|Michael R. Dougherty                                                       |  | $                | 318,000
|Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer |  |                  |        
|                                                                           | 
|Martha E. Manning                                                          |  | $                | 266,750
|Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary                       |  |                  |        
|                                                                           | 
|James A. Barrett                                                           |  | $                | 338,000
|Senior Vice President, Chief Scientific Officer and President, Research    |  |                  |
No. 00-7286.

#### Gall *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certio-rari denied.
#### Anthony LOVE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 76-2025, 77-1700.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 6, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., James H. Greason, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John Mop-pert, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J, and BARK-DULL, J., and PARKER, J. GWYNN (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *Wilkinson v. State,*322 So.2d 620 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); *Monge v. State,*286 So.2d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); *Bocchino v. Wainwright,*231 So.2d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); *Childs v. State,*190 So.2d 605 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); *Gibson v. State,*173 So.2d 766 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965). *Douglas v. State,*326 So.2d 33 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). *Dickenson*v. *State,*261 So.2d 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); *Capetta v. Wainwright,*203 So.2d 609 (Fla.1967); *Belsky v. State,*231 So.2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1989 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1989

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 57 Rolfe Square in Cranston, Rhode Island, shall be known and 
          designated as the ``Holly A. Charette Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 10, 2005

 Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Chafee) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 57 Rolfe Square in Cranston, Rhode Island, shall be known and 
          designated as the ``Holly A. Charette Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HOLLY A. CHARETTE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 57 Rolfe Square in Cranston, Rhode Island, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Holly A. Charette Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Holly A. 
Charette Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```