Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 178 / Monday, September 15, 1997 / Notices 48267

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. OA96–70–001]

Boston Edison Company; Notice of

Filing

September 9, 1997.

Take notice that on July 9, 1997,

Boston Edison Company of Boston,

Massachusetts tendered for filing an

index of its service agreements under its

open-access transmission tariff pursuant

to the Commission’s order in Allegheny

Power System, Inc., 80 FERC ¶61,143

(1997).

Boston Edison states that copies of

this filing have been served on the

affected customers and the

Massachusetts Department of Public

Utilities.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.,

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

or protests should be filed on or before

September 19, 1997. Protests filed with

the Commission will be considered by

it in determining the appropriate action

to be taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–24361 Filed 9–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. TM98–1–123–000]

Crossroads Pipeline Company; Notice

of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas

Tariff

September 9, 1997.

Take notice that on September 3,

1997, Crossroads Pipeline Company

(Crossroads) tendered for filing as part

of its FERC Gas Tariff, Sixth Revised

Tariff Sheet No. 6. Crossroads asserts

that this filing is being made to comply

with the Commission’s notice of August

20, 1997 and Section 154.402 of the

Commission’s regulations.

Crossroads states that the purpose of

the filing is to add an Annual Charge

Adjustment (ACA) unit charge to its

tariff. Crossroads requests an effective

date of October 1, 1997 for the proposed

tariff sheet and a waiver of Section

154.207 of the Commission’s

regulations.

Crossroads states further that copies

of the filing were served on its current

firm and interruptible customers and

interested state commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest this filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Sections

385.211 and 385.214 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations.

All such motions or protests must be

filed as provided in Section 154.210 of

the Commission’s Regulations. Protests

will be considered by the Commission

in determining the appropriate action to

be taken in this proceeding, but will not

serve to make protestants parties to the

proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party must file a motion to

intervene. Copies of Crossroads’ filing

are on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–24371 Filed 9–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP97–363–001]

Egan Hub Partners, L.P.; Notice of

Compliance Filing

September 9, 1997.

Take notice that on September 4,

1997, Egan Hub Partners, L.P. (Egan

Hub), filed tariff sheets to reflect

compliance with Order No. 587 et seq.

and an ‘‘Order on Compliance Filing’’

issued on June 30, 1997, 79 FERC

¶ 61,423 (1997), (hereinafter the ‘‘June

30 Order’’). In addition to filing tariff

sheets that have been revised to comply

with changes ordered by the

Commission in the June 30 Order, Egan

Hub states that it is also filing those

tariff sheets that were approved by the

Commission in the June 30 Order. In

addition to the foregoing changes, Egan

Hub states that it has also corrected

spelling and similar errors.

Any person desiring to protest this

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.,

20426, in accordance with Section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed as provided in Section 154.210 of

the Commission’s Regulations. Protests

will be considered by the Commission

in determining the appropriate action to

be taken but will not serve to make the

protestants parties to the proceeding. A

copy of this filing is on file with the

Commission and is available for public

inspection in the public reference room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–24366 Filed 9–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP97–514–000]

Huntsville Utilities Gas System City of

Huntsville, Alabama v. Midcoast

Interstate Gas Transmission, Inc.;

Notice of Complaint and Motion for

Expedited Relief

September 9, 1997.

Take notice that on September 4,

1997, Huntsville Utilities Gas System,

City of Huntsville, Alabama,

(Huntsville) tendered for filing a

complaint against Midcoast Gas

Transmission, Inc. (Midcoast) and a

motion for expedited relief, pursuant to

Section 5 of the Natural Gas Act, Order

No. 636–A, and Rules 206 and 212 of

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and

Procedure.

Huntsville submits its complaint

against the alleged unlawful auction

procedures of Midcoast and the

improper bids by Midcoast’s marketing

affiliate, Midcoast Marketing, Inc.

(MMI), with respect to certain firm

transportation capacity Huntsville has

on Midcoast that is subject to expiring

service agreements for which Huntsville

has a tariff right of first refusal (ROFR).

Midcoast Gas Tariff, General Terms and

Conditions, Section 3.14(e).

Among other things, Huntsville

contends that the terms of the auction

were inconsistent with the

Commission’s May 30, 1997, Order in

docket No. RP97–331, which among

other things stays abandonment

authority relating to service to

Huntsville until April 1, 1998.

Huntsville also contends that MMI,

which is the sole bidder on its expiring

capacity, bid on the Huntsville capacity,

without having market support for its

bids, in an effort to manipulate the

auction and force Huntsville to exercise