alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form of First Amendment to Restricted Stock Award Agreement



 Exhibit 10.4 
 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. 
 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 RESTRICTED
STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT 
 WHEREAS, United Parcel Service, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“UPS”), has granted one or more awards
of shares of restricted class A common stock of UPS (each, an “Award”) to non-management directors of UPS (“Director”) pursuant to the United Parcel Service, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, each Award is evidenced by a agreement that includes the terms and conditions of the grant (the “Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of UPS desires to amend the Agreement for each of the Awards to provide for full vesting of the shares
of restricted class A common stock of UPS subject to such Award in the event that a Director’s continuous service as a director of UPS terminates by reason of Director’s acceptance of a position in government or other public service;

 NOW THEREFORE, each Award identified below hereby is amended as follows 
 1. 
 The second paragraph of Section 3, Forfeiture and Vesting, of the Agreement hereby is amended to
read as follows: 
 In addition, Director will vest in all of the shares of Restricted Stock if Director’s continuous
service as a director of UPS terminates prior to the Vesting Date by reason of Director’s (i) death, (ii) disability or (iii) resignation in connection with Director’s acceptance of a position in government or other public service. If
Director’s service as a director of UPS terminates before the Vesting Date, other than as described in the immediately preceding sentence, Director will forfeit all shares. 
 2. 
 The Awards amended by this First Amendment are as follows: 
  

					
	 Director
	 	 Award Date
	 	 Number of Restricted Shares

	Michael J. Burns	 		 	
	James P. Kelly	 		 	
	Ann M. Livermore	 		 	











					
	Stuart E. Eizenstat	 		 	
	John W. Thompson	 		 	
	Carol B. Tomé	 		 	
	Bernardus Verwaayen	 		 	

 3. 
 This First Amendment is effective as of August 29, 2007 and except as otherwise amended herein, the Agreement for each Award as in effect immediately prior to this First Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. 
 4. 
 This First Amendment is subject to all of the terms and
conditions in the Plan and is binding upon UPS, its Subsidiaries and the Directors and their respective heirs, executors, administrators and successors. 
  

			
	The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
		
	By:	 	 



			
	Title:	 	 


  

 2
#### Kenneth DONALDSON v. J. B. O’CONNOR, M.D., Superintendent of Florida State Hospital.

No. 38610.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 1969.

Appeal dismissed without opinion.
# DSCC police reunite missing man with family

/ Published Jan. 30, 2017
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Defense Supply Center Columbus police responded to a call at the Yearling Road Gate Jan. 18 after a disoriented, elderly man walked onto the installation trying to get to his father’s house.

Officer David Webb was the first on site and realized this was not a normal situation; Sgt. Jerry Pyle arrived shortly after. “The only information he could tell us was his age, 70. He couldn’t tell us his birthday, where he was from or anything else,” Pyle said.

The officers were able to obtain his driver’s license and ran it through the database system. That’s when Pyle confirmed the suspicion about this being an unusual stop. The terminal provided an alert for a missing person.

Family had reported him missing from Massillon, Ohio roughly 48 hours prior and noted he suffers from dementia, high blood pressure and early onset Alzheimer’s disease. He had also been without his medicines for approximately 36 hours.

The family was notified their missing relative was found and they immediately left their home in Massillon, Ohio and headed to Columbus to be reunited. On the previous day, police had discovered his vehicle on Interstate 670. He had run out of gas, grabbed his gas can and started walking. He was wandering around the city for almost a full day before he arrived at the DSCC gates.

“We thought he was originally from the area because he mentioned many times that he wanted to go to his dad’s house and pointed to the other side of the installation,” said Pyle. “He was nervous and confused.”

"This was a hard situation; the person appeared disoriented. He made several comments saying ‘I didn’t do anything wrong’,” said Pyle.

Lt. Harry Salcone said the officers’ training was able help the situation. One of the initial responding officers, Webb, recognized the lights and sirens were causing unnecessary agitation. “Webb took action and turned off the overhead — reds and blues — which calmed the man’s anxiety and improved the situation almost immediately,” Pyle said.

“The reward of the gentleman being reunited with his family was great,” Lt. Marco Schmigotzki said, “It was such a great thing to be involved in something so positive.”

Salcone also spoke on the response team’s actions. “When you look at the totality of what happened, this is what I would call excellence in action,” he said. “These officers and sergeants responded to an unknown situation, made an evaluation and brought the situation to a logical conclusion. They train for situations like these, but to see it implemented and the positive outcome is what this job is about. It’s an incredible thing that doesn’t happen all the time.”
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46248-46249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23158]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-46-000]


Kentucky West Virginia Gas Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Proposed 
Change in FERC Gas Tariff

August 26, 1997.
    Take notice on August 22, 1997, Kentucky West Virginia Gas Company, 
L.L.C. (Kentucky West), tendered for filing to become part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to 
be effective October 1, 1997:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 4
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 5
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 163

    Pursuant to Order No. 472, the Commission authorized pipeline 
companies to track and pass through to their customers their annual 
charges under an Annual Charge Adjustment (ACA) clause. The 1997 ACA 
unit surcharge approved by the Commission

[[Page 46249]]

is $.0021 per Dth. Also, minor typographical changes were made on Sheet 
Nos. 4 and 5 to capitalize the ``C'' in customer, and on Sheet No. 163 
the listing of the ACA charge was changed to a tariff sheet 
designation.
    Kentucky West states that a copy of its filing has been served upon 
its customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23158 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23804]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-499-000]


CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

September 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, CNG Transmission Corporation 
(CNG), tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets:

2nd Revised 14th Revised Sheet No. 31
Thirtieth Revised Sheet No. 32
Thirtieth Revised Sheet No. 33
2nd Revised 15th Revised Sheet No. 35
2nd Revised 15th Revised Sheet No. 36

    CNG requests an effective date of October 1, 1997, for its proposed 
tariff sheets.
    CNG states that the purpose of this filing is to enable CNG to 
recover the costs associated with Texas Eastern Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Eastern) Rate Schedule FT-1/N.C., as permitted by 
the June 1995 Stipulation and Agreement, in light of the Commission's 
March 13, 1997 ``Order on Remand and Reconsideration'' in the instant 
proceeding.
    CNG states that copies of this letter of transmittal and enclosures 
are being mailed to CNG's customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC, 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23804 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Filed 7/29/15

Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Four

- No. B241727

S214150



## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

En Banc

________________________________________________________________________

SALVADOR RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

RWA T RUCKING COMPANY, INC., Defendant and Appellant.

________________________________________________________________________

Defendant RWA Trucking, Inc., and the California Trucking Association ‟ s request

for republication of the Court of Appeal ‟ s opinion, o riginally published at 219

Cal.App.4th 692, is granted. The opinion is ordered republished with the following

amendment to original footnote 6 at page 723 (additions underlined and deletions stricken

through):

Division Five of this appellate district re jected Fitz

- Geral d’ s analysis in part in

People ex rel. Harris v. Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc. (May 18, 2011, B220966) 195

Cal.App.4th 765 , review granted August 10, 2011, S194388.

Pac Anchor is currently under review by the California Supreme Court, where the

question presented is as follows: “ Is an action under the Unfair Competition Law (Bus.

& Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) that is based on a trucking company ‟ s alleged violation of

state labor and insurance laws „ related to the price, route, or ser vice ‟ of the company and,

therefore, preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994

(49 U.S.C. § 14501)? ”

[Re porter ‟ s Note: See People ex rel. Harris v. Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc.

(2014) 59 Cal.4th 772.]

____ __________________________ Chief Justice
#### Carl A. COPPOLINO v. STATE of Florida.

No. 38868.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 1969.

Appeals dismissed without opinion. 223 So.2d 68.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Paul Hawran, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Sequenom, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that,
to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Quarterly Report)
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d), of the Exchange Act, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Quarterly Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has set their hands hereto as of the 7th day of May, 2008.



/s/ PAUL HAWRANPaul HawranChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
OSWER/OSRTI 

Washington, DC 20460 

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) 

***Final Site*** May 2014

PCE SOUTHEAST CONTAMINATION York, Nebraska

York County

 Site Location:

The PCE Southeast Contamination site includes the central and southeastern portions of the city of York, Nebraska, which 

includes an industrial and urban residential area, and a rural residential area just outside of the southeastern portion of the 

city limits. 

 Site History:

Preliminary Assessment and Site Inspection activities have been conducted at the site. The PCE Southeast Contamination 

site is a ground water plume. The site is composed of documented releases of hazardous substances, mainly volatile organic 

compounds (VOCs), into soils and ground water. There are many possible sources resulting from various operations such 

as dry cleaners, metal degreasing operations and grain storage facilities. One municipal water supply well has been 

contaminated and taken off line. The plume has also contaminated three private residential water supply wells, which have 

required the provision of alternate water. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

The ground water plume is comprised of chlorinated solvents, including but not limited to: tetrachloroethene (PCE), 

trichloroethene (TCE), and their degradation products. 

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment:

The ground water plume extends approximately 2 miles. There are several private water supply wells and irrigation wells in 

danger of becoming contaminated because they are located down-gradient of the ground water plume. 

 Response Activities (to date):

There is an ongoing removal action at PCE Southeast Contamination site to provide alternate water to impacted residences. 

The EPA has provided alternate water to three residences at the request of the state of Nebraska.

 Need for NPL Listing:

The state of Nebraska referred the site to the EPA because the site requires short-term and long-term response actions and 

listing will provide for investigation into the nature and extent of contamination and, if necessary, remediation of the site. 

Other federal and state cleanup programs were evaluated, but are not viable options at this time. The EPA received a letter 

of support for placing this site on the NPL from the state.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change 

as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these 

substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet 

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23874]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--The Asymmetrical Digital Subscriber Line Forum

    Notice is hereby given that, on May 15, 1997, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), The Asymmetrical Digital 
Subscriber Line Forum (``ADSL'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, the following companies have joined ADSL: 
ELSA GmbH, Aachen, Germany; EPL Ltd., Bradford on Avon, Wiltshire, 
England; Hayes Microcomputer Products, Inc., Atlanta, GA; Microsoft 
Corporation, Redmond, WA; Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology 
America, Somerset, NJ; Redback Networks, Inc., San Jose, CA: SGS 
Thomson Microelectronics, St. Genispouilly, France; ATM Ltd., Santa 
Clara, CA; Efficient Networks, Dallas, TX; Netspeed, Inc., Dallas, TX; 
Nortel, Harlow, Essex, United Kingdom; NYNEX S&T, Boston, MA; and 
Siemens Stromberg-Carlson, Lake Mary, FL.
    Copper Mountain has changed its name to Copper Mountain Network; 
and GTE Telephone Operations has changed its name to GTE Corporation.
    CSELT; DTI; Harris Semiconductor; Independent Editions; NET; SAT; 
Telia; Telstra; and Vertel have cancelled their membership in ADSL.
    No other changes have been made in the membership, nature or 
objectives of ADSL. Membership remains open, and ADSL intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 15, 1995, ADSL filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 25, 
1995 (60 Fed. Reg. 38058).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 5, 
1996. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on April 3, 1997 (62 FR 15938).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-23874 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# DLA Distribution trains workforce on recognizing and responding to homemade explosives

/ Published Feb. 8, 2018
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., In partnership with the U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Philadelphia Division, Harrisburg Field Office and the Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Emergency and Special Response, DLA Installation Operations Susquehanna, Security and Emergency Services provided no cost training on Improvised Explosive Devices to Defense Distribution Center, Susquehanna employees Jan. 25.
The training event, officially titled Homemade Explosives: Awareness, Recognition and Response, was conducted at DLA Distribution Headquarters in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania.  Attendees included installation employees, federal, state and local authorities, local first responders, and key community stakeholders. 

Participants were provided awareness-level training on IEDs, including how to recognize and respond to them.  The training provided an overview on how powerful explosives can be made from common consumer goods that are bought and sold every day in communities across America. 

Providing real-world examples of the dangers of an IED, the audience viewed short video clips from case studies and investigations conducted by the FBI and PSP, and participated in a facilitated discussion by the agents who conducted these investigations.

 “The underlying purpose of the training is to promote workforce resiliency to meet the installation’s goal of supporting the Warfighter while showcasing the installation’s strong partnerships with federal, state and local first responders,” said Tim Moore, Installation antiterrorism officer.

At the conclusion of the course, participants were better postured to assist in developing and implementing security-related processes with regard to identifying suspicious packages and behaviors within their respective work centers.  

This course was part one of a two-part training event with a second session scheduled for March to discuss homemade explosives.