alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adolor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen W. Webster, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Stephen W. Webster                                    
|Stephen W. Webster                                        
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|October 30, 2009
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer  of Golden Spirit Enterprises Ltd. (the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for  the  quarter ended March 31, 2008  (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934  and that information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 46880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23517]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD08-97-033]


Drawbridge Operations; Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, LA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District has issued a 
temporary deviation from the regulation governing the operation of the 
SR 27 vertical lift span drawbridge across the Gulf Intracoastal 
Waterway, mile 243.8, west of Harvey Lock, at Ellender, Calcasieu 
Parish, Louisiana. This deviation allows the bridge to remain closed to 
navigation between the hours of 3 a.m. and 11 a.m. on September 6, 
1997. This closure is necessary to facilitate movement of vehicular 
traffic for a continuous concrete pouring operation scheduled for that 
day.

DATES: The deviation is effective from 3 a.m. until 11 a.m. on 
September 6, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Phil Johnson, Bridge 
Administration Branch, Commander (ob), Eighth Coast Guard District, 501 
Magazine Street, New Orleans, Louisiana 70130-3396, telephone number 
(504) 589-2965.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SR 27 vertical lift span drawbridge 
across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 243.8, west of Harvey Lock, 
at Ellender, Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana has a vertical clearance of 50 
feet above mean high water in the closed to navigation position and 135 
feet above mean high water in the open to navigation position. 
Navigation on the waterway consists of tugs with tows, including crane 
barges, commercial fishing vessels, sailing vessels and other 
recreational craft. The Louisiana Department of Transportation and 
Development has requested a temporary deviation from the normal 
operation of the bridge so that the contractor can conduct a continuous 
concrete pour operation at the U.S. Department of Energy Storage Site 
at Hackberry, Louisiana. This operation will require that approximately 
35 cement trucks deliver pre-mixed concrete to the site on a perpetual 
traveling schedule. Delays to vehicular traffic due to drawbridge 
openings at the SR 27 bridge would jeopardize this time sensitive 
procedure.
    Presently, the draw is required to open on signal if at least four 
hours' notice is given. This deviation allows the draw to remain closed 
to navigation between the hours of 3 a.m. and 11 a.m. on September 6, 
1997.

    Dated: August 26, 1997.
T.W. Josiah,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 97-23517 Filed 9-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
# Perna led new approaches to warfighter support

/ Published July 26, 2018
DLA Troop SupportArmy Materiel Command
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Rudolph WILSON.

No. 60709.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 15, 1978.

*423Thomas W. Mull, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., William L. Brockman, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

A

- AL

- GATOR, INC. d/b/a A

- ALLIGATOR, INC. , Appellant,

v.

CLYDE FULTZ, MERLINE DESHOMMES, FELTAR, LLC, and SWAY 2014

- 1 BORROWER, LLC , Appellee s

.

No s . 4D 21

- 1189 and 4D 21

- 1486

[ June 23, 2022 ]

Consolidated a ppeal s from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; David A. Haimes , Judge; L.T. Case No. 15

- 2662 CACE (08)

.
Zachary D. Ludens, Jordan A. Shaw and Steffani M. Russo of Zebersky Payne Shaw Lewenz, LLP, F ort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Cody L. Frank and Marlin K. Green of Brown Sims, P.C., Coral Gables, for appellees Fetlar, LLC and Sway 2014

- 1 Borrower, LLC.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH , C.J., C IKLIN and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Evelio ROSELL, Appellant, v. Christina Louis ROSELL, Appellee.

No. 77-2205.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 15, 1978.

Hirschhorn & Freeman and Joel Hirsch-horn, Miami, for appellant.

Fink & Syna and Richard K. Fink, Miami, for, appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and KEHOE, JJ.

KEHOE, Judge.

Appellant, plaintiff below, brings this appeal from an order on motions for custody, *87modification, visitation, contempt, and child support, entered by the trial court on September 28, 1977.

Appellant first contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for modification of child support. We disagree. The actions of the trial court are adequately supported by the record and appellant has failed to show any clear abuse of discretion. See, e. g., *Krischer v. Krischer,*337 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); *Kalmutz v. Kalmutz,*299 So.2d 30 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); *Simonet v. Simonet,*279 So.2d 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); and *Morse v. Morse,*191 So.2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966).

Appellant’s second point is that the trial court erred in finding him in contempt of court for furnishing certain medical care to the parties’ minor child. In our opinion, this contention is not supported by the record or the order appealed; the trial court did not find appellant in contempt of court. However, because the following language found in paragraph 3 on page 3 of the trial court’s order could be construed as implying such a finding, we feel that this language should be stricken from the order:

> “. . . however, the court withholds adjudication and sanctions subject to Respondent in the future complying with all of the Orders of this court; . . .”

Further, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by requiring each party to pay their own attorneys’ fees. See § 61.16, Fla.Stat. (1975).

Affirmed as modified.
Exhibit 32.1


                        View Systems, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of View Systems, Inc. certifies (the
"Company") pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(A)   the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
      ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(B)   the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.



Date:   November 12, 2004                /s/ Gunther Than
                                         ____________________________________
                                         Gunther Than
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                SUBSIDIARIES OF SOURCE INTERLINK COMPANIES, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                   COMPANY NAME                      STATE OF ORGANIZATION
--------------------------------------------------   ---------------------
<S>                                                  <C>
Source Interlink Companies, Inc.                            Delaware
Alligator Acquisition, LLC                                  Delaware
Source Home Entertainment, Inc.                             Delaware
The Interlink Companies, Inc.                               Delaware
Source-U.S. Marketing Services, Inc.                        Delaware
Source-Chestnut Display Systems, Inc.                       Delaware
Source-Yeager Industries, Inc.                              Delaware
Source-Huck Store Fixtures Company                          Delaware
Source-MYCO, Inc.                                           Delaware
Source Interlink International, Inc.                        Delaware
Primary Source, Inc.                                        Delaware
T.C.E. Corporation                                          Delaware
Vail Companies, Inc.                                        Delaware
The Source-Canada Corp.                                     Ontario
International Periodical Distributors, Inc.                  Nevada
David E. Young, Inc.                                        New York
Brand Manufacturing Corp.                                   New York
Source Interlink Canada, Inc.                           British Columbia
Huck Store Fixture Company of North Carolina, Inc.       North Carolina
AEC One Stop Group, Inc.                                    Delaware
Distribution & Fulfillment Services Group, Inc.             Delaware
A.E. Land Corp.                                             Delaware
AEC Direct, Inc.                                            Delaware
AEC Supermarket Services Group, LLC.                        Delaware
</TABLE>
#### Charles W. JONES v. Judith B. JONES.

No. 49945.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 21, 1977.

John L. Hatcher, Cleveland, for appellant.

Levingston, Jacks, Levingston & Land, Alfred A. Levingston, Cleveland, for appel-lee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Bolivar County; William H. Bizzell, Chancellor.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.

INZER and SMITH, P. JJ., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
Douglas W. Domenech 

Secretary of Natural RCSCHIrces 

COMMONWEALTH a/VIRGINIA 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

Street address: 629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 

Mailing address: P.O. Box 1105, Richmond, Virginia 23218 

TDO (804) 698-4021 

www.deq.virginia.gov 

SEP 27 LOIO 

Ms. Diana Esher, Director 

Air Protection Division (3APoo) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

David K. Paylor 

Director 

(804) 6984000 

1-800-592-5482 

Reference: Definition of Volatile 

Organic Compound, Revision 

G09 

Dear Ms. Esher: 

Pursuant to the requirements of § 110 of the Clean Air Act, we are officially requesting 

approval of a revision to the Commonwealth of Virginia State Implementation Plan approved 

and submitted under the authority of § 10.1-1185 of the Code of Virginia and in accordance with 

the requirements of 40 CFR Part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of 

Implementation Plans). 

This revision updates the definition of volatile organic compound (9VAC5-10-20) to 

include EPA's exclusion of propylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate, which have been 

demonstrated to be less reactive. The regulation amendments were adopted by the State Air 

Pollution Control Board on September 3, 2009 under the authority of § 10.1-1308 of the Code of 

Virginia. 

Enclosed are the following: 

I. A true copy of the official regulation (Revision G09) which was published in the 

Virginia Register of Regulations on January 4, 2010 after being duly adopted by 

the State Air Pollution Control Board on September 3, 2009, certified by the 

Office of the Attomey General as within the board's statutory authority on 

September 14, 2009 and thus fully enforceable under Virginia law, and submitted 
to the Virginia Registrar on behalf of the board by the Department of 

Environmental Quality as a true and accurate copy of the duly adopted regulation 

on December 15,2009, providing the evidence required by Section 2.1 (b) and (e) 

of Appendix V of 40 CFR Part 51. 

2. Certification of public participation activities and compliance with state 

administrative procedures. 

3. Public participation record. 

If you have any questions or need additional information, please let us know. 

DKPlkgs 

TEMPLA TES\SIP-REG\REGOO 

SIPINONATI'N AREAS\2010\G09-SIP.OOC 

Enclosures 

David K. Paylor
256 La. 260

#### Remy BARTHELEMY v. CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE CO.

No. 50637.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co. applying for writ of mandamus, and alternatively writs of certiorari and review.

Writs refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
# Members of the U.S. Army’s 6th Medical Logistics Management Center visit DLA Distribution

/ Published Feb. 23, 2018
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
The 6th Medical Logistics Management Center is a unique, one-of-a-kind Army unit with the mission to deploy, establish, integrate, and synchronize medical logistics operations in support of any Army or Joint Forces specified mission.

As part of their leadership professional development program, members from the Army’s 6th Medical Logistics Management Center visited DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, Feb. 20, to learn about DLA’s global logistics processes and operations.  

The 19-member team received a distribution overview presentation detailing various special functions the command provides - such as kitting and hazardous material handling - and detailed transportation coordination that the organization provides for all of DLA.

After the presentation the group received a walking tour of DLA Distribution Susquehanna’s Eastern Distribution Center, the largest warehouse in the Department of Defense.  

There, they toured the receiving, processing, storage, retrieval and out loading operations, where they saw the distribution supply chain in action.  Their tour included other key locations – the Consolidation and Containerization Point, the high-rise storage and retrieval system, and the air line of communication pallet build area. 

In Building 89 they learned of the Cold Chain Team Management processes and packaging control.

Sgt. 1st Class Clinton Knighten is their Non-Commissioned Officer in Charge of Operations.  He deals a lot with helping other units prepare for deployments – teaching them about systems that are utilized in requesting medical equipment or medical supplies. 

“Seeing how that all connects down here at the distribution center has value to the entire group.  It helps connect the pieces, or better yet, broadens the perspective on how all the pieces are connected in the mission, so that we understand better the importance of what we’re doing.”

According to Capt. Jose Melendez, commander, Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment, 6th MLMC, part of their job is to act as enablers when in their theater of operation, where they often have to start their set-up from scratch.  Witnessing the distribution process up close here is very helpful.

“Understanding the chain and the process will help us out by way of managing expectations for our customers.  Instead of telling them constantly that items are coming, (by seeing this process) we can help them understand where (items/supplies) it’s coming from and what impact it has on their request.”
Notes from Meeting with Stericycle

Attended by:

Stericycle Staff: Celine Hoboy

TCH Group, LLC Staff: Carl Gist

EPA Staff: Charlotte Mooney, Lisa Lauer, Jessica Young, Kristin Fitzgerald, Samantha 

Lewis, and Meghan Hessenauer

Date: December 8, 2010

EPA met with representatives from Stericycle. Stericycle discussed the comments they 

submitted on the Office of Water’s draft Best Management Practices for Unused 

Pharmaceuticals at Health Care Facilities. They informed EPA that reverse distributors are not 

repurposing pharmaceuticals, as our guidance had assumed. Stericycle also informed EPA that 

hospitals tend not to have Environmental, Health and Safety (EH&S) departments, but that 

those roles fall to facilities staff or infectious nurses.
E

ufaulaN

 

ationalW

 

ildlifeR

 

efuge

   Comprehensive Conservation Plan

Eufaula

National Wildlife Refuge

Comprehensive Conservation Plan 

EufaulaNational Wildlife RefugeComprehensive Conservation Plan 

USFWS Photo USFWS Photo

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
guidance for

d strategies

e Fish and

e plans detail

ally above

for Service

s. The plans do

erational and

uisition.
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Gunther Than, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of View Systems,
Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

       (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

       (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

       (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

       (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

       (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


                                /s/ Gunther Than
Date: August 12, 2003           _________________________________________
                                Gunther Than, Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 99




Release Date:                                        Further Information:

IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                    David J. Bursic
August 14, 2007                                      President and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                              -or-
                                                     Pamela M. Tracy
                                                     Investor Relations
                                                     Phone: (412) 364-1913


                        WVS FINANCIAL CORP. TO REPURCHASE
                      UP TO 125,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

         PITTSBURGH,   PENNSYLVANIA--WVS  Financial  Corp.  (NASDAQ:WVFC),   the
holding  company for West View Savings Bank,  announced today that the Company's
Board of Directors  authorized  its Ninth Stock  Repurchase  Program.  The Ninth
Stock Repurchase  Program will total 125,000 shares,  or approximately  5.50% of
the 2,271,885  shares expected to be outstanding  upon completion of the current
Eighth Stock  Repurchase  Program,  and will  commence  upon  completion  of the
current  repurchase  program.  As of August 13, 2007, 10,520 shares remain to be
repurchased  under the current  program as the Company has  repurchased  114,480
shares.

         Repurchases  are authorized to be made by the Company from time to time
in open-market transactions as, in the opinion of management,  market conditions
warrant.  The  repurchased  shares  will be held as  treasury  stock  and may be
reserved for issuance pursuant to the Company's stock benefit plans.

         WVS Financial Corp.  owns 100% of the outstanding  common stock of West
View Savings Bank.  The Savings Bank is a  Pennsylvania-chartered,  FDIC-insured
savings bank which  conducts  business in the North Hills suburbs of Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania.

                                      # # #



                                  Page 4 of 4
cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge

Abdul Howard Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A are 2