alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 177 (Friday, September 12, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48026-48027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23978]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[OH106-1b; FRL-5890-8]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Ohio

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 48027]]

SUMMARY: On February 21, 1997 the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 
(Ohio EPA) submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision request 
to USEPA which consisted of a number of rules and rule paragraphs 
formerly contained in the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) which had been 
incorporated in the Ohio SIP but which had been amended or removed from 
the OAC by the State. The State requested that these rules and rule 
paragraphs be removed from the Ohio SIP since they are no longer part 
of the OAC. The USEPA is proposing to approve the State's request. In 
the final rules section of this Federal Register, the USEPA is 
approving the State's request as a direct final rule without prior 
proposal because USEPA views this action as noncontroversial and 
anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for approving the 
State's request is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse 
written comments are received in response to that direct final rule, no 
further activity is contemplated in relation to this proposed rule. If 
USEPA receives substantive adverse written comments which have not 
already been responded to, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and 
all such public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent 
final rule based on the proposed rule. USEPA will not institute a 
second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in 
commenting on this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Written comments on this proposed rule must be received on or 
before October 14, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be mailed to J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, 
Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), Region 5 
at the address listed below. Copies of the materials submitted by the 
Ohio EPA may be examined during normal business hours at the following 
locations: Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois, 60604. Ohio EPA, Division of Air Pollution Control, 
1800 Watermark Drive, Columbus, OH 43215.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randolph O. Cano at (312)886-6036.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    For additional information see the direct final rule published in 
the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: August 27, 1997.
Michelle D. Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-23978 Filed 9-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1896 

To permit access to Federal crime information databases by educational 

agencies for certain purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To permit access to Federal crime information databases 

by educational agencies for certain purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Schools Safely Acquir5 ing Faculty Excellence Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO FEDERAL CRIME INFORMATION DATA 

7 BASES BY EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES FOR CER8 TAIN PURPOSES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General of the 

10 United States shall, upon request of the chief executive 
2 

•S 1896 IS

1 officer of a State, conduct fingerprint-based checks of the 

2 national crime information databases (as defined in sec3 tion 534(e)(3)(A) of title 28, United States Code), pursu4 ant to a request submitted by a local educational agency 

5 or State educational agency in that State, on individuals 

6 under consideration for employment by the agency in a 

7 position in which the individual would work with or around 

8 children. Where possible, the check shall include a finger9 print-based check of State criminal history databases. The 

10 Attorney General and the States may charge any applica11 ble fees for these checks. 

12 (b) PROTECTION OF INFORMATION.—An individual 

13 having information derived as a result of a check under 

14 subsection (a) may release that information only to an ap15 propriate officer of a local educational agency or State 

16 educational agency, or to another person authorized by 

17 law to receive that information. 

18 (c) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.—An individual who know19 ingly exceeds the authority in subsection (a), or knowingly 

20 releases information in violation of subsection (b), shall 

21 be imprisoned not more than 10 years or fined under title 

22 18, United States Code, or both. 

23 (d) DEFINITION.—In this section, the terms ‘‘local 

24 educational agency’’ and ‘‘State educational agency’’ have 

25 the meanings given to those terms in section 9101 of the 
3 

•S 1896 IS

1 Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 

2 U.S.C. 7801). 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1480 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1480

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To establish the treatment of actual rental proceeds from leases of 
  land acquired under an Act providing for loans to Indian tribes and 
                          tribal corporations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTIFICATION OF RENTAL PROCEEDS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any actual rental 
proceeds from the lease of land acquired under the first section of the 
Act entitled ``An Act to provide for loans to Indian tribes and tribal 
corporations, and for other purposes'' (25 U.S.C. 488) certified by the 
Secretary of the Interior shall be deemed--
            (1) to constitute the rental value of that land; and
            (2) to satisfy the requirement for appraisal of that land.

            Passed the Senate July 26, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1480

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To establish the treatment of actual rental proceeds from leases of 
  land acquired under an Act providing for loans to Indian tribes and 
                          tribal corporations.
```
Page of

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P070375 Assessor: Wormell

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#: 1 Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity: Manf.

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Release Days/yr:

Per Site Release:

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day)

Remarks:

Consumer use expected? 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 10
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page of 

CASE NUMBER:P070375

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 10
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page of

CASE NUMBER: P070375

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 10
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page of

CASE NUMBER:P070375

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 10
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page of

CASE NUMBER:P070375

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 10
Page of

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Case Number: P070375 Assessor: Wormell

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#: 2 Number of Release Sites: 

Release Activity: Use

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Release Days/yr:

Per Site Release:

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day)

Remarks:

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 10
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page of 

CASE NUMBER:P070375

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 10
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page of

CASE NUMBER: P070375

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 10
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page of

CASE NUMBER:P070375

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 10
INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Page of

CASE NUMBER:P070375

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 10
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2605

MARY K. FISHER; CHARLES FRANCIS PATTERSON,

Petitioners - Appellants,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the United States Tax Court.

(Tax Ct. Nos. 95-6382, 95-6383, 95-6384)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 28, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary K. Fisher, Charles Francis Patterson, Appellants Pro Se.

Loretta C. Argrett, John F. Nolet, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Stuart L. Brown, INTERNAL REVENUE

SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Charles Patterson and Mary Fisher appeal from the

tax court's decision finding a deficiency in Fisher's 1991 return,

but no deficiency in Patterson's 1991 return or their 1992 joint

return. We have reviewed the record and the tax court's opinion,

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the tax court. Patterson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Nos. 95-6382; 95-6383; 95-6384 (Tax Court Aug. 19, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 11

                         The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.
               Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
                      (in millions, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                        12 Weeks Ended
                                                                    3/18/00     3/20/99
                                                                    -------     -------
Number of shares on which basic earnings (loss) per share is based:

<S>                                                                      <C>         <C>
  Average outstanding during period .........                           149          55
  Add - Incremental shares under stock
    compensation plans ......................                             -           -
                                                                      -----      ------
Number of shares in which diluted
  earnings per share is based ...............                           149          55

Net earnings (loss) applicable to common
   shareholders .............................                         $  17      $   (3)

Net earnings (loss) on which diluted earnings
   per share is based .......................                         $  17      $   (3)

Basic earnings (loss) per share .............                         $0.11      $(0.06)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share ...........                         $0.11      $(0.06)


</TABLE>


                                      -18-
# L_2013179EN.01009501.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 179/95 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 179/95

---

DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

of 26 June 2013

appointing a Judge to the General Court

(2013/339/EU)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 19 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 254 and 255 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Under Articles 5 and 7 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and following the resignation of Mr Josef AZIZI, with effect from 1 September 2013, a Judge should be appointed to the General Court for the remainder of the term of office of Mr AZIZI, which runs until 31 August 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Under Articles 5 and 7 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and following the resignation of Mr Josef AZIZI, with effect from 1 September 2013, a Judge should be appointed to the General Court for the remainder of the term of office of Mr AZIZI, which runs until 31 August 2016.

| (2) | Mr Viktor KREUSCHITZ has been proposed as a candidate for the vacant post. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Mr Viktor KREUSCHITZ has been proposed as a candidate for the vacant post.

| (3) | The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on Mr Viktor KREUSCHITZ's suitability to perform the duties of a Judge of the General Court, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on Mr Viktor KREUSCHITZ's suitability to perform the duties of a Judge of the General Court,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Viktor KREUSCHITZ is hereby appointed Judge to the General Court for the period from 1 September 2013 to 31 August 2016.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 26 June 2013.

The President

R. MONTGOMERY

---
#### Hugh B. C. FORRESTER, Petitioner, v. CAREER SERVICE COMMISSION of Florida, and the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Respondent.

No. GG-189.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 9, 1978.

Jerry G. Traynham, of Patterson & Traynham, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen, and David J. Baron, David K. Miller, Asst. Attys. Gen., Douglas E. Whitney, Tallahassee, and Anthony N. DeLuccia, Jr., Ft. Myers, for appellee.

BOYER, Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of a decision of the Career Service Commission upholding his dismissal from employment by the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services.

Petitioner raises as error the Commission’s practice of rendering a final order at the conclusion of a hearing without allowing the parties to submit proposed findings of fact and orders.

Pursuant to F.S. 120.57, a party has the right to raise pertinent factual issues for administrative determination, to submit proposed findings on those issues and to receive a ruling on each pertinent proposed finding. See *Stuckey’s of Eastman, Georgia v. Department of Transportation,*340 So.2d 119, 120 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). However, in so holding we stress that an agency head is not required to make explic*221it rulings on subordinate, cumulative, immaterial or unnecessary proposed facts. Those proposed findings which fall in such a category may be rejected by a simple statement that they are immaterial or irrelevant. Nor is a party entitled to more than a reasonable period of time within which to make such submissions. If the time permitted is not so short as to violate the spirit of the statute or to deny due process under the circumstances of the particular case it will not be disturbed on review here.

The other points raised by petitioner are without merit and will not be discussed.

Therefore, without regards to the merits of petitioner’s dismissal, this court relinquishes jurisdiction for a short but reasonable period of time (but not in excess of thirty days) so that the Commission may comply with the statute and this opinion. See *Perry v. Career Service Commission,*351 So.2d 730 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

It is so ordered.

McCORD, C. J., and MELVIN, J., concur.
RE: Other data used in the MATS MACT floor analyses Bill Maxwell to: Higgins, Cortney 12/06/2011 09:21 AM Cc: RobertJ Wayland

Cortney --

The MACT floor analyses are based on individual unit (EGU) data so we use the number of units rather than plants/facilities/sites/etc.

Thanks.

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5430
FAX: 919-541-5450

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: Bill Maxwell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/06/2011 09:03 AM Subject: RE: Other data used in the MATS MACT floor analyses

Hi Bill, Thanks. Do you also have the number of sources (rather than units) used, or for the sake of setting standards is a unit the same as a source?

Regards, Cortney

-----Original Message----- From: Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Maxwell.Bill@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 2:36 PM To: Higgins, Cortney Cc: Wayland.Robertj@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Other data used in the MATS MACT floor analyses

Cortney --Attached is the file of the data used for the MACT floor analyses. The data are listed by facility (ORIS) code. Note, for filterable PM (fPM), one needs to look to the new columns to the right of the main data columns for the updated values. To make it easier to review, we have placed all fpm data in the green columns even if those data stayed the same as in the main data columns for easier review. Also, note that these data are all data for which we could determine an emission factor.This does not mean that the data were used in a floor (e.g., zinc).

You also requested a listing of the numbers of units in the coal-fired population and the number of units in the respective MACT floor pools.
Those numbers are:

Total coal-fired population: 1,082 EGUs Low rank virgin coal-fired EGUs: 36 EGUs Number in the "non-low rank virgin coal" Hg MACT floor pool: 47 EGUs Number in the "low rank virgin coal" Hg MACT floor pool: 2 EGUs Number in the HCl MACT floor pool: 130 EGUs Number in the PM MACT floor pool: 130 EGUs

Thank you.

(See attached file: OMB_all data used_12_5_11.xlsx)

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Phone: 919-541-5430
FAX: 919-541-5450
**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002**
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF SOLE REMAINING OFFICER-DIRECTOR
 
 In
connection with this Quarterly Report of *GYK
Ventures, Inc.* , a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-QSB for March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Dan
Sifford, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Table On Dated:
May 15, 2005
 
 /s/J. Dan
Sifford
 J. Dan
Sifford
 sole
officer/director
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45272-45273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22564]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1301.33 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on July 10, 1997, Novartis 
Pharmaceutical Corp., 59 Route 10, East Hanover, New Jersey 07936, made 
application by letter dated July 10, 1997, to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
Schedule II controlled substance methylphenidate (1724).
    The firm, which is currently registered with DEA as a bulk 
manufacturer of methylphenidate at another location plans to 
manufacture validation batches in preparation of

[[Page 45273]]

moving all bulk manufacturing of methylphenidate to the above location.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the proposed registration.
    Any such comments, or objections may be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, United States 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA Federal 
Register Representative (CCR), and must be filed no later than (60 days 
from publication).

    Dated: July 29, 1997.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-22564 Filed 8-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
UNITED
STATES


SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
D.C. 20549




FORM
8-K




CURRENT
REPORT




Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934




Date of
Report (date of earliest event reported):   July 22,
2008




VALLEY COMMERCE
BANCORP


(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)




California
            333-118883
            46-1981399(State
      or other jurisdiction
              of
      incorporation)
            (Commission
      File Number)
            (IRS
      Employer
              Identification
      No.)





200
      South Court Street
              Visalia,
      California
            93291(Address
      of principal executive offices)
            (Zip
      Code)







Registrant’s
telephone number, including area
code:  (559) 622-9000




N/A


(Former
name or former address, if changed since last report)






Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions:




o  Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)




o  Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)




o  Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))




o  Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))







Item
2.02                       Results
of Operations and Financial Condition





On July 22, 2008, the registrant
issued the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99 and incorporated herein
by reference.











Item
9.01.                      Financial
Statements and Exhibits





(c)              The
exhibit list required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the exhibit
index filed as part of this report.





SIGNATURES




Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
hereunto duly authorized.




Dated:
      July 22, 2008
            Valley
      Commerce Bancorp
              
              
              By:
      /s/ Roy O.
      Estridge
              Roy O. Estridge
              Executive Vice President and
              Chief Financial
Officer








EXHIBIT
INDEX




99
            Press
      release dated July 22, 2008 announcing unaudited financial results for the
      six month period ended June 30,
2008.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000430

22-DEC-2016

09:12 AM