alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47485-47486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-483-006]


Wyoming Interstate Company Ltd.; Notice of Tariff Compliance 
Filing

September 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 27, 1997, Wyoming Interstate Company 
Ltd. (``WIC''), Post Office Box 1087, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80944, 
tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 2, First Revised Sheet No. 61 and First Revised 
Sheet No. 62 to be effective September 26, 1997.
    WIC states is it making this filing to comply with the Order No. 
636-6 (78 FERC para. 61,186) issued February 26, 1997 (Order). 
Specifically WIC states these sheets are filed to comply with ordering 
paragraph (B) of the Order which states ``Within 180 days of the 
issuance of this order, any pipeline with a right of first refusal 
tariff provision containing a contract term cap longer

[[Page 47486]]

than five years must revise its tariff consistent with the new cap 
adopted herein.''
    WIC further states that copies of this filing have been served on 
WIC's jurisdictional customers and public bodies and that the filing is 
available for public inspection at WIC's offices in Colorado Springs, 
Colorado.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 
of the Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests 
must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23789 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS I, John Pappajohn, certify that: 1)

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of PACE Health Management
Systems;  2)

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;  4)

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  a)

designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;  b)

evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and  c)

disclosed
in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.  5)

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)

all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and  b)

any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Date:   March 26, 2004 /s/   John PappajohnJohn PappajohnDirector and Acting CEO
1 

# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 09

- 221 V

Filed: January 8, 2016

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

D.B., * UNPUBLISHED

*

Petitioner, * Special Master Hamilton

- Fieldman

*

v. * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs;

* Reasonable Amount Requested to

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Which Respondent Does Not Object.

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Diane C. Cooper

, Bruce G. Clark & Associates, P.C.

, for P etitioner

. Alexis Babcock

, United States Department of Justice, Washington , D

. C

. , for R espondent.

DECISION 1

On April 14, 2009

, D.B. (“ P etitioner ”) filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine

Injury Compensation Program

. 2 42 U .S.C. §§ 300aa

- 1 to

- 34 (2006). On January 9, 2014, the

undersigned issued a decision dismissing the petition, and on January 14, 2014, judgment entered

on the dismissal.

On January 12, 2015, the above captioned

- counsel entered her appearance on behalf of

Petitioner, and o n January 13 , 2015, Petitioner filed a motion to vacate the judgment. The

undersigned denied Petitioner’s motion on September 4, 2015.

On Decembe r 21 , 2015 , the parties filed a Stipulation of Facts Regarding Final

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. Pursuant to their Sti pulation, the parties have agreed to an award of

$ 14 ,000.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs. In accordance with General Order Number 9, the parties

represent that Petitioner has n ot personally incurred any costs during the time that Ms. Cooper

has represente d her.

1 This decision was originally filed on December 21, 2015. In the reissued decision, Petitioner’s

name is , at her request, replaced with her initial s ; the remainder of the decision is unchanged.

2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National

Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,

4 2 U.S.C. §§ 300aa

- 1 to

- 34 (2012 ) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to

individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.2 The unde rsigned finds that the motion to vacate judgment was brought in good faith and

that there e xisted a reasonable basis for filing it . Therefore, an award for fees and costs is

appropriate, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount

seems reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, the undersigned hereby awards the amount

of $14 ,000.00 , in the form of a check made payable jointly to Petitioner and Petitioner ’s

counsel, Diane C. Coope r , of the law firm of Bruce G. Clark & Associates, P.C

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of

the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’

stipulation. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Lisa Hamilton

- Fieldman

Lisa Hamilton

- Fieldman

Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint

filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41046 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. COREY MINOR Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:07-CR-48-ALL Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Corey Minor has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Minor has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 10, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
### W ater S olubility

A pril 25, 2013

SUMMARY is the major component of The water solubility of in has been determined to be 745 mg/L using the shake flask method. This experimental value is an average of 3 independent water solubility determinations (572, 799 and 865 mg/L)

MATERIALS The test article was received from the Spo nsor and identified as follows: Sponsor’s ID: Physical Description: brown semi- solid Receipt date: February 2013 The test article was stored at room temperature.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Sample Preparation

0. 1 g test material was weighed into a vial and 10 ml HPLC water was added. The solution was shaken for 2 weeks at 30°C. The test was carried out in triplicate . After the material was shakenfor 2 weeks, the vials were allowed to settle for 24 h at 25°C. A 1ml sample of water from each flask was filtered and transferred to an autosampler vial for HPLC analysis.

HPLC analysis Column: 150 mm x 4.6 mm 5μm XDB -C18 column Mobile phase: 25 % THF / 7 5% water  100% THF in 7 min linear gradient

Flow Rate: 1 ml/min

Detection : UV @ 230nm Injection volume for sample analysis: 0.2 μL

RESULTS

Calibration Data

Figure 1. HPLC Chromatogram -Figure 2. Calibration plot for

Water solubility analysis

F igure 3. HPLC chromatogram of – water soluble fraction y = 12,085,893.32x R2 = 0.97

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

0 0.00005 0.0001 0.00015 0.0002 0.00025peak area

mgTable 1. Water solubility data for



### The water solubility of in at 25°C = 745 mg/L

EPIWIN ESTIMATE

Smiles:

Sample ID mg/L 2-AEN in water WS1 572 WS2 799 WS3 865
#### ENTERPRISE PROPERTIES, LTD., et al., Appellants, v. NATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC., a Kentucky corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-126.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 17, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1861 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1861

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the phaseout of 
 personal exemptions and the overall limitation on itemized deductions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              October 7 (legislative day, October 6), 2005

    Mr. Harkin (for himself, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Levin, and Mr. Kennedy) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the phaseout of 
 personal exemptions and the overall limitation on itemized deductions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF PHASEOUT OF PERSONAL EXEMPTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 151(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exemption amount) is amended by 
striking subparagraphs (E) and (F).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2005.

SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF PHASEOUT OF OVERALL LIMITATION ON ITEMIZED 
              DEDUCTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 68 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking subsections (f) and (g).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
#### Conrado INDART, Administrator of the Estate of Nelson Domingo Cienfuentes, and Amado Indart, Individually and as the guardian of Sonia I. Cienfuentes, Individually and as the widow of Nelson Domingo Cienfuentes, Appellants, v. ORANGE COUNTY, a subdivision of the State of Florida, and the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 76-2553.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 1, 1977

*612Stone, Sostchin, Koss & Gonzalez, P.A., Miami, for appellants.

Steven R. Bechtel, Mateer, Harbert, Bechtel & Phalin, P.A., Orlando, for appellee Orange County.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Clarence Holmes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee State of Florida.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See *Circuit Court, etc. v. Department of Natural Resources,*339 So.2d 1113 (Fla.1976) and *Gordon v. City of West Palm Beach,*321 So.2d 78 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.10 

Silicon Graphics
Computer Systems




October 16, 1996

Mr. Richard J. Szalwinski
Chairman and CEO
Discreet Logic
5505, boul. St. Laurent, bureau 5200
Montreal (Quebec) Canada  H2T 1S6

     Re:  Extension of Value Added Reseller Agreement terms and conditions;
          Agreement No. 12-11-441

Dear Richard:

This letter shall serve to extend discount and payment terms of the Value Added
Reseller Agreement ("Agreement"), and the Amendment thereto, between Silicon
Graphics, Inc. ("SGI") and Discreet Logic Inc. ("Discreet").  This extension
shall be effective as of October 15, 1996, and continue until and including
January 15, 1997.

All other terms and conditions in the above referenced Agreement and Amendment
shall apply to purchases made by Discreet during the term of this extension.

During the term of this extension, SGI shall present to Discreet a new contract
proposal for Discreet's review and execution.

Please indicate your acceptance of the above referenced extension by signing
where noted below.  If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to 
contact me.

Very truly yours                         Acknowledged and agreed:

/s/ Erna Arnesen
                                                
Erna Arnesen                             By:    /s/ Richard J. Szalwinski
Director, Global Channel Development            ---------------------------
(415) 933-5910                           Name:  Richard J. Szalwinski
                                                ---------------------------
                                         Title: Chairman and CEO
                                                ---------------------------
                                         Date:  
                                                ---------------------------  

cc:  Cathy Lawson (SGI)
     Jacquelyn L. Rider (SGI)
Exhibit  32.2
                                                                  -------------

                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                              A Nevada corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Katharine Johnston, Principal Accounting Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




         Dated: November 4, 2005                 /s/  Katharine Johnston
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Its: Principal Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.














                                    32.2-1
256 La. 259

#### Mrs. Bernice GASQUET v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO.

No. 50635.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Travelers Indemnity Company applying for writ of mandamus, and alternatively writs of certiorari and review.

Writs refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
# Subsistence grows produce support to Alabama schools with satsumas 

/ Published Feb. 9, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 

Schoolchildren in Alabama are enjoying a citrus treat this winter thanks in part to the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support.

Satsumas, also known as the Christmas orange, are a seedless fruit with loose skin grown in Alabama. DLA Troop Support’s Subsistence supply chain provides them to schools in the state through the Department of Defense Fresh Program.

The DOD Fresh Program enables DLA to buy and distribute fresh produce to schools using entitlement funds set aside by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Ken Wilmoth, Subsistence customer relations supervisor, and Allan Reif, Subsistence customer account specialist, work with agencies in the state to ensure Alabama schools receive quality produce.

Subsistence purchases several crops grown in Alabama during the school year. When first presented with the satsumas, Wilmoth and Reif agreed that schoolchildren would enjoy the easy-to-peel orange.

Subsistence provided 5,650 cases of Alabama-grown satsumas during the 2015-2016 school year, said Brantley Tucker, from the Alabama Department of Education child nutrition program.

That’s more than doubled this year with 16,000 cases purchased, said Don Wambles, from the Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries.

Alabama schools have taken more advantage of the DOD Fresh Program overall, from $75,000 worth of produce in 1995 to about $5 million this year, Wilmoth said. 

Wambles said it takes a lot of coordination to get fresh produce to the schools, but strong relationships among the various agencies involved helps.

“I would definitely recommend the DOD Fresh program,” said Wambles. “It is a wonderful partnership between local farmers, the Department of Education, the Department of Agriculture, DLA and the schools. It is a way to provide fresh local products to our children.”

Other Alabama crops that Subsistence provides to schools through the DoD Fresh program include apples, watermelons, sweet potatoes and grape tomatoes.
SERVED: NOVEMBER 22, 2011 ,..>,• p-fj^^^NT OF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC zoii m^i 2i> p 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AvDync Aeroserviccs. LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. |T0 BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Aciion) 

FDMSNO. FAA-20I1-1I2I 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding {heretofore dcsignaled as Case No. 20IOEA270032) has been assigned 

to the undersigned. All future pleadings and other coniniunicaiions regarding this proceeding 

shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached 

Service List. 

Ronnie A. Yoder' 

Chief Administrative'Law Judee 

/ 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMSNO. FAA-20II-1121 

(Civil Penalty Aciion) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Adniinisiration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

RobcH D. Schnlte, Responded 

Schulte Booth, P.C. 

3001 Elliot Street 

Baltimore, MD 21224 

TEL: 410-732-1315 

FAX: 410-732-1316 

Edmund J. Avcrman, III. Coniplainanrs Counsel 

Office of ihe Chief Counsel, AGC-300 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

TEL: 202-267-3147 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room El2-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Serviue was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use llie lollowing address; Federal 

Aviaiion Adniini.siration, 600 Independence Avenue. S.W.. Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000, Washingion, 

DC 20.591: Aticntinn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30.
No. 00-7300.

#### Norris *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.