alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1901 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1901

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 567 Tompkins Avenue in Staten Island, New York, as the ``Vincent 
                        Palladino Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 20, 2005

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Clinton) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 567 Tompkins Avenue in Staten Island, New York, as the ``Vincent 
                        Palladino Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VINCENT PALLADINO POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 567 Tompkins Avenue in Staten Island, New York, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Vincent Palladino Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Vincent 
Palladino Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinion should not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt exc ept under the limite d circumstances set forthin5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 51199 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. L U IS A R M A N D O SO T O

- V ILL A N U E VA , al so kn o w n a s Lu i s R am i rezV illa n u e v a , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 3: 08- C R
- 1606- 1
B ef ore W IE N E R , B E N AV ID E S , an d S T E W A R T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e a tto rn e ya p p o in te d to r e p re se n t L u i s A rm a n d o S o to -V il la n u e v a (S o to ) has m o ve d f

o rl e av e t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ers v . Ca lif o rn ia , 3 86 U
. S. 7 38 ( 19 67 )
. So t o ha s no tfi l ed a re s po ns e . Our i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r ivo l o us i s s u e fo r a p p e a l. A c c o r d in g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is G RA N TE D , c o uns e li s e xc us e d f r o m f ur t he rr e s po nsi bi l i t i e s he r e i n, a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 20, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Amended Notice of Meeting of the National Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Advisory Council

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the September 11 meeting of 
the National Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Advisory 
Council which was published on August 7, 1997, 62 FR 42587.
    The meeting was to have been a closed meeting convened at 1 pm and 
adjourned at 2 pm on September 11. The meeting has been changed to a 
partially closed meeting. The Council will meet in open session from 1 
pm to approximately 1:45 pm to discuss a meeting of the Work Group on 
Peer Review. At approximately 1:45 pm the meeting will be closed until 
adjournment for the review of grant applications.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.173 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communication Disorders)

    Dated: September 4, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-23896 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Frances L. LINDQUIST, Appellant, v. Elmer W. LINDQUIST, Appellee.

No. 76-1194.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 4, 1977.

Gerald C. Surfus, of Stinnett, Surfus & Martin, P.A., Sarasota, for appellant.

Gregory S. Hartman, of Swisher & Voigt, P.A., Sarasota, for appellee.

GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dissolution. The only point which merits discussion concerns the disposition of a mobile home.

The parties were married on January 11, 1975. Shortly thereafter, the husband used $6,000 of his own funds to purchase a mobile home and caused it to be titled in the names of himself and his wife. The parties separated several months later, and a suit for dissolution was filed on September 8, 1975. In the final judgment the court awarded the mobile home to the husband.

This court recently held that where a wife’s separate funds were used to purchase property held as tenants by the entirety subsequent to the adoption of Florida’s 1968 Constitution but before the Supreme Court’s opinion in *Ball v. Ball,*385 So.2d 5 (Fla.1976), there existed a presumption that a gift had been made.1 While there has been a split of authority in the case of a wife’s separate funds,2 until the Supreme Court rendered its *Ball*opinion the use of a husband’s separate funds to acquire property held as tenants by the entirety has always resulted in the presumption of a gift.3

This suit was filed prior to the date of the *Ball*opinion. Therefore, since the record is totally devoid of any evidence to rebut the presumption of a gift, the judgment must be reversed insofar as it deprives the wife of her one-half interest in the mobile home. *See*Section 689.15, Florida Statutes (1975). Otherwise, the judgment is affirmed.

RYDER, J., and McNULTY, JOSEPH P. (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.

1

. *Powell v. Powell,*349 So.2d 841 (Fla.2d DCA 1977).

2

. *Compare Davis v. Davis,*282 So.2d 655 (Fla.4th DCA 1973), *with Hegel v. Hegel,*248 So.2d 212 (Fla.3d DCA 1971).

3

. *Powell v. Metz,*55 So.2d 915 (Fla.1952); *Strauss v. Strauss,*148 Fla. 23, 3 So.2d 727 (1941); *Anderson v. Anderson,*153 So.2d 24 (Fla.3d DCA 1963).
# Europos Sąjungos C 83I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 083I |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 64 metai2021m. kovo 12d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 083I

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

64 metai2021m. kovo 12d.

---

| Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Pranešimai |
| | VALSTYBIŲ NARIŲ PRANEŠIMAI |
| 2021/C 83 I/01 | Valstybių narių pateikta informacija apie žvejybos uždraudimą | 1 |

Turinys

Puslapis

IV   Pranešimai

VALSTYBIŲ NARIŲ PRANEŠIMAI

2021/C 83 I/01

Valstybių narių pateikta informacija apie žvejybos uždraudimą

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

IV Pranešimai

VALSTYBIŲ NARIŲ PRANEŠIMAI

| 2021 3 12 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CI 83/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2021 3 12

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CI 83/1

---

Valstybių narių pateikta informacija apie žvejybos uždraudimą

(2021/C 83 I/01)

Pagal 2009 m. lapkričio 20 d. Tarybos reglamento (EB) Nr. 1224/2009, nustatančio Sąjungos kontrolės sistemą, kuria užtikrinamas bendrosios žuvininkystės politikos taisyklių laikymasis (1), 35 straipsnio 3 dalį priimtas sprendimas uždrausti žvejybą, kaip nurodyta šioje lentelėje:

| Draudimo įsigaliojimo data ir laikas | 2020 12 24 |
| --- | --- |
| Taikymo trukmė | 2020 12 24 – 2020 12 31 |
| Valstybė narė | Portugalija |
| Ištekliai arba išteklių grupė | ALB/AN05N |
| Rūšys | Ilgapelekis tunas (Thunnus alalunga) |
| Zona | Atlanto vandenynas į šiaurę nuo 5° šiaurės platumos |
| Žvejybos laivų tipas (-ai) | — |
| Nuorodos numeris | 40/TQ123 |

Draudimo įsigaliojimo data ir laikas

2020 12 24

Taikymo trukmė

2020 12 24 – 2020 12 31

Valstybė narė

Portugalija

Ištekliai arba išteklių grupė

ALB/AN05N

Rūšys

Ilgapelekis tunas (Thunnus alalunga)

Zona

Atlanto vandenynas į šiaurę nuo 5° šiaurės platumos

Žvejybos laivų tipas (-ai)

—

Nuorodos numeris

40/TQ123

---

(1)  OL L 343, 2009 12 22, p. 1.

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Willard CARLOCK, Sr.

No. 60492.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 1, 1977.

In re: Willard Carlock, Sr. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order.

Writ denied. Article 682 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by clear implication invests in the Attorney General the authority of a district attorney in the prosecution when the trial judge notifies him of the recusal of the district attorney. Moreover, in the absence of a specific prohibition to that effect, an attorney employed under authority of article 63 of the Code of Criminal Procedure may continue his private practice.

CALOGERO, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. C.Cr.Pr. art. 682 does not by implication or otherwise invest in the attorney general authority of a district attorney in the prosecution when the trial judge notifies him of recusal of a district attorney. In such event Art. 682 simply imposes upon the attorney general the duty to appoint a district attorney of another district or a member of his staff to act in the place of a recused district attorney. Even in this latter event it is the substitute, the attorney general’s staff member, who has the power of the recused district attorney with reference to the case, not the attorney general. In this case the attorney whose recusal is sought is not a member of the attorney general’s staff, but rather by the attorney general’s own designation, simply special counsel. I believe the motion to recuse has merit.
```

[111th Congress Public Law 251]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 2631]]

Public Law 111-251
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the 
 Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and 
       for other purposes. <<NOTE: Sept. 30, 2010 -  [S. 3839]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF 
                              PROGRAMS UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS 
                              ACT AND THE SMALL BUSINESS 
                              INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958.

    (a) In General.--Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to extend 
temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business Administration'', 
approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109-316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most 
recently amended by section 1 of Public Law 111-214 (124 Stat. 2346), is 
amended by striking ``September 30, 2010'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``January 31, 2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on September 29, 2010.

    Approved September 30, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3839:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Sept. 24, considered and passed Senate.
            Sept. 28, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 173 (Monday, September 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23703]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SKILL STANDARDS BOARD


Notice of Open Meeting

AGENCY: National Skill Standards Board.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Skill Standards Board was established by an Act 
of Congress, the National Skill Standards Act, Title V, Pub. L. 103-
227. The 27-member National Skill Standards Board will serve as a 
catalyst and be responsible for the development and implementation of a 
national system of voluntary skill standards and certification through 
voluntary partnerships which have the full and balanced participation 
of business, industry, labor, education and other key groups.

TIME AND PLACE: The meeting will be held from 8:30 a.m. to 
approximately 3:30 p.m. on Friday, September 26, 1997, in Mount Vernon 
Salons A, B & C at the Madison Hotel located at 15th and M Streets, NW, 
Washington, D.C. 20005

AGENDA: The agenda for the Board Meeting will include: an update from 
the Board's committees, representatives from the groups convening the 
Voluntary Partnerships, and a preliminary report on how the Board and 
the American National Standards Institute intend to work together.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting, from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., is open 
to the public. Seating is limited and will be available on a first-
come, first-served basis. Seats will be reserved for the media. 
Individuals with disabilities should contact Pat Warfield at (202) 254-
8628, if special accommodations are needed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tracy Marshall, Manager of Program 
Operations at (202) 254-8628.

    Signed at Washington, D.C., this 29th day of August, 1997.
Edie West,
Executive Director, National Skill Standards Board.
[FR Doc. 97-23703 Filed 9-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-23-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23925]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-47-000]


MIGC, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes In FERC Gas Tariff

September 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, MIGC, Inc. (MIGC) tendered for 
filing to become part of FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, 
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 4. This tariff sheet is proposed to become 
effective October 1, 1997.
    MIGC states that the instant filing is being submitted to reflect 
Annual Charge Adjustment unit charges applicable to transportation 
services during the fiscal year commencing October 1, 1997.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a petition to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 214 and 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 and 385.211). All such petitions or 
protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of the 
Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a petition to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secrretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23925 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Case 4:04-cr-00234-JEJ Document 251 Filed 08/02/06 Page 1 of 6
Case 4:04-cr-00234-JEJ Document 251 Filed 08/02/06 Page 2 of 6
Case 4:04-cr-00234-JEJ Document 251 Filed 08/02/06 Page 3 of 6
Case 4:04-cr-00234-JEJ Document 251 Filed 08/02/06 Page 4 of 6
Case 4:04-cr-00234-JEJ Document 251 Filed 08/02/06 Page 5 of 6
Case 4:04-cr-00234-JEJ Document 251 Filed 08/02/06 Page 6 of 6
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 168 (Friday, August 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45879-45880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23050]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (97-125)]


NASA Advisory Council; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, (Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the NASA Advisory Council.

DATES: September 16, 1997, 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.; and September 17, 
1997, 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Building 8, 3rd Floor 
Management Conference Center, Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Anne L. Accola, Code Z, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 202/358-2096.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public up to 
the seating capacity of the room. Advanced notification of attendance 
is requested by calling the NASA Advisory Council Staff office in the 
Office of Policy and Plans on 202/358-2096. The agenda for the meeting 
is as follows:

--Update on Activities at NASA
--Research Grants Management
--Integrated Financial Management Project
--Institutional and Programmatic Changes and Challenges at GSFC
--Shuttle Upgrades
--Reusable Launch Vehicle Mission Model
--Radiation-hardened, Radiation-tolerant Electronics
--Technology Development in the Mission to Planet Earth Strategic 
Enterprise
--Environmental Research Aircraft and Sensor Technology Program
--Committee Reports
--Discussion of Findings and Recommendations

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key

[[Page 45880]]

participants. Visitors will be requested to sign a visitor's register. 
Visitors will be requested to provide photo identification (e.g., 
driver's license) and sign for a visitor's badge from the Goddard Space 
Flight Center Main Gate Receptionist in Building 9.

    Dated: August 25, 1997.
Leslie M. Nolan,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-23050 Filed 8-28-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
EXHIBIT 99.1



               STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         The undersigned, Eugene R. Sunderhaft, is the Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Oswego County Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").

         This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
June 30, 2002 (the "Report").

         By execution of this statement, I certify that:

                  A) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

                  B) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

         This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report
so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that
this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.







Date:  November 13, 2002                    By:  /s/ Eugene R. Sunderhaft
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Eugene R. Sunderhaft
                                                 Senior Vice President and Chief
                                                 Financial Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1760 

To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau of Reclamation 

within Rogue River Valley Irrigation District or within Medford Irrigation District. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2005 

Mr. SMITH (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau 

of Reclamation within Rogue River Valley Irrigation District or within Medford Irrigation District. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Southern Oregon Bu5 reau of Reclamation Repayment Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EARLY REPAYMENT. 

7 Notwithstanding the provisions of section 213 of the 

8 Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390mm), any 

9 landowner within Rogue River Valley Irrigation District 
2 

•S 1760 IS

1 or within Medford Irrigation District, in Oregon, may 

2 repay, at any time, the construction costs of the project 

3 facilities allocated to that landowner’s lands within the 

4 district in question. Upon discharge, in full, of the obliga5 tion for repayment of the construction costs allocated to 

6 all lands the landowner owns in the district in question, 

7 those lands shall not be subject to the ownership and full8 cost pricing limitations of the Act of June 17, 1902 (43 

9 U.S.C. 371 et seq.), and Acts supplemental to and amend10 atory of that Act, including the Reclamation Reform Act 

11 of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390aa et seq.). 

12 SEC. 3. LIMITATION. 

13 Nothing herein modifies contractual rights that may 

14 exist between Rogue River Valley Irrigation District and 

15 Medford Irrigation District and the United States under 

16 their respective Reclamation contracts, or amends or re17 opens those contracts; nor does it modify any rights, obli18 gations or relationships that may exist between the dis19 tricts and their landowners as may be provided or gov20 erned by Oregon state law. 

21 SEC. 4. CERTIFICATION. 

22 Upon the request of a landowner who has repaid, in 

23 full, the construction costs of the project facilities allo24 cated to that landowner’s lands owned within the district, 

25 the Secretary of the Interior shall provide the certification 
3 

•S 1760 IS

1 provided for in subsection (b)(1) of section 213 of the Rec2 lamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390 mm(b)(1)). 

Æ
#### Rossie D. COLEMAN v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 38980.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
# Brahmsteadt named DLA’s new command senior enlisted leader

/ Published March 7, 2017
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, The Office of the Senior Enlisted Advisor to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff announced March 6 that Command Master Chief Shaun Brahmsteadt will succeed Command Sgt. Maj. Charles Tobin as the Defense Logistics Agency’s command senior enlisted leader. Brahmsteadt currently serves as the command master chief, Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Maryland. A native Californian, Brahmsteadt entered naval service in July 1985, attending recruit training in San Diego. He graduated from the U.S. Navy Senior Enlisted Academy in October 2004 and the Command Master Chief Course in June 2006. Brahmsteadt previously served as the command master chief for the USS George Washington stationed out of Yokosuka, Japan. He earned his bachelor’s degree in Information Systems Technology and a master’s degree in Administrative Leadership from the University of Oklahoma.The change of responsibility ceremony date is yet to be determined.