alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
aldr-ex101_332.htm


Exhibit 10.1

Alder BioPharmaceuticals, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Information

In September 2015, our Board of Directors amended our non-employee director compensation policy, pursuant to which we compensate our non-employee directors with an annual cash retainer. Each such director receives an annual base cash retainer of $40,000 for such service, to be paid monthly. The non-executive chairperson of our Board of Directors receives an additional annual base cash retainer of $20,000 for such service, to be paid monthly. 

The policy also provides that we compensate the members of our Board of Directors for service on our committees as follows: 

 


	
 
	
•
	
 
	
The chairperson of our Audit Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $15,000 for such service, paid monthly, and each of the other members of the Audit Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $7,500, paid monthly. 




 


	
 
	
•
	
 
	
The chairperson of our Compensation Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $10,000 for such service, paid monthly, and each of the other members of the Compensation Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $5,000, paid monthly. 




 


	
 
	
•
	
 
	
The chairperson of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $7,000 for such service, paid monthly, and each of the other members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an annual cash retainer of $3,500, paid monthly. 




The policy, as amended, further provides for the grant of equity awards as follows: 

 


	
 
	
•
	
 
	
Upon a non-employee director’s election to our Board of Directors, such director will receive an option to purchase 30,000 shares of our common stock. One-third of the shares subject to each stock option will vest on the one-year anniversary of the date of grant, one-third of the shares subject to each stock option will vest on the two-year anniversary of the date of grant and one-third of the shares subject to each stock option will vest on the three year anniversary of the date of grant, such that the option is fully vested on the third anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the director’s continued service through each such vesting date and will vest in full upon a change in control. 




 


	
 
	
•
	
 
	
On the date of each annual meeting of stockholders, each non-employee director will receive an option to purchase an additional 15,000 shares of our common stock. 




Each of these options will be granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of such grant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-1703

Plaintiff : 

(JUDGE MANNION)

v. :

 

JOHN DOE subscriber assigned :

IP address 73.52.94.247,

:

Defendant

:

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of this date, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT the court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Serve

Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference (Doc. 6), subject to

the conditions below:

1. Plaintiff may serve a Rule 45 subpoena upon the third party

internet service provider Comcast Cable (the “ISP”), for the

purpose of obtaining information necessary to identify the

individual assigned with the IP address 73.52.94.247

(“John Doe Defendant”), specifically his or her name and

address. The subpoena shall have a copy of this order

attached;

2. The ISP will have fourteen (14) days from the date of

service of the Rule 45 subpoena to serve the John Doe

Defendant with a copy of the subpoena and a copy of this

order. The ISP may serve the John Doe Defendant using

any reasonable means, including written notice sent to his

or her last known address, transmitted either by first-class

Case 3:15-cv-01703-MEM Document 10 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 2
mail or via overnight service;

3. The John Doe Defendant shall have fourteen (14) days

from the date of service of the Rule 45 subpoena to file any

motions with this court contesting the subpoena (including

a motion to quash or modify the subpoena). The ISP may

not turn over the John Doe Defendant’s identifying

information to Plaintiff before the expiration of this 28 day

period. Additionally, if the John Doe Defendant or ISP files

a motion to quash the subpoena, the ISP shall not produce

any information to Plaintiff until the court issues an order

instructing the ISP to resume production of the requested

discovery. If the John Doe Defendant moves to quash or

modify the subpoena, the John Doe Defendant shall

contemporaneously notify the ISP so that the ISP is on

notice not to release the John Doe Defendant’s contact

information to Plaintiff until the rules on any such motion;

4. If the 28 day period lapses without the John Doe

Defendant or ISP contesting the subpoena, the ISP shall

have fourteen (14) days to produce the information

responsive to the subpoena to Plaintiff;

5. The ISP shall preserve any subpoenaed information

pending the resolution of any timely-filed motion to quash;

6. Any information ultimately disclosed to Plaintiff in response

to a Rule 45 subpoena may be used by Plaintiff solely for

the purpose of litigating the instant case.

s/ Malachy E. Mannion 

MALACHY E. MANNION

United States District Judge

DATED: September 30, 2015

O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2015 MEMORANDA\15-1703-01-ORDER.wpd

2

Case 3:15-cv-01703-MEM Document 10 Filed 09/30/15 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.15








 


Amendment to Purchase Agreement







Party A: Shandong Spring Pharmaceutical Industrial Company Limited


Party B: Shandong YCT Group Limited Liability Company







After a discussion, Party A and Party B agreed on restructuring the types of health supplements that Party B has been distributing. Party B will now distribute 4 product combinations rather than 10 products. This restructure is to promote the brand image, to motivate the market, and to substantially upgrade the products.


 



	
1.

	
On June 30, 2014, 24:00 Party B should terminate the supply and distribution of the 10 products.


 








	
2.

	
The model, size, and the pricing of the new product combinations are listed below:


 







	
Code

	
Name of the product combination

	
Size

	
Unite

	
Price (tax included)

	
Details

	
Size

	
Unit

	
Quantity


	
HD001

	
Ginkgo Tea Gift Set

	
1*2.5g*180 pack

	
Set

	
680.00/set

	 	 	 	 
	
HD002

	
Supplements Gift Set

	
1*3

	
Set

	
700.00/set

	
Ganoderma Hong Jing Tian Capsules

	
0.3g*100 pills

	
Bottle

	
1


	
Kang Le Capsules

	
0.25g*100 pills

	
Bottle

	
1


	
Xin Wei Gai Tablets

	
0.8g*120 tablets

	
Bottle

	
1


	
HD003

	
Functional Diet Gift Set

	
1*4

	
Set

	
655.00/set

	
Gouqi Tablet

	
0.69*200 tablets


 

	
Bottle

	
1


	
Aloe Xuelian

	
0.59g*200 tablets

	
Bottle

	
1


	
Spirulina

	
0.59*200 tablets

	
Bottle

	
1


	
Protein

	
0.25g*200 tablets

	
Bottle

	
1


	
HD005

	
Skin Care Set

	
1*5

	
Set

	
704.00/Set

	
Eye Cream

	
1*25g

	
Tube

	
1


	
Night Cream

	
1*50g

	
Bottle

	
1


	
Cream

	
1*55g

	
Bottle

	
1


	
Toner

	
1*120ml

	
Bottle

	
1


	
Plant Essence

	
1*55g

	
Bottle

	
1


 






	
3.

	
On July 1, 00:00 Party B should start the supply and the distribution of the new product combinations.


 








	
4.

	
The previous methods of settlement and payment remain unchanged.


 








	
5.

	
Party B should proactively give instructions on and promote the new products combinations to consumers and distributors.












This agreement has the same legal effect as Supplements Purchase Agreements (Contract code: CT2015016), signed on February 26, 2015. This agreement has two copies, one for each party, effective once signed or stamped.







Party A: Party A: Shandong Spring Pharmaceutical Industrial Company Limited


Party A Representative:







Party B: Shandong YCT Group Limited Liability Company


Party B Representative:












Signed on: June 25, 2015
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 21, 2018

d1120 

# Order

Clerk November 21, 2018

158544

In re L.L. MELENDEZ, Minors. SC: 158544

COA: 338076

Wayne CC Family Division:

16

- 523785

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 18, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Commentary: A veteran reflects on service, pride in fellow service members

/ Published Nov. 8, 2018
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                              SUMMARY OF BONUS PLAN

      IL Fornaio (America) Corporation (the Company) has a bonus plan (the Bonus
Plan) pursuant to which certain officers are eligible to receive annual cash
bonuses in amounts ranging from 25% to 50% of their respective base salaries if
certain performance targets established by management and approved by the Board
of Directors are met. Such performance targets may include, among other things,
the overall profitability of the Company and of particular components of the
Company's business, the completion of special projects or the achievements of
certain cost efficiencies. Prior to payment of any bonuses, the Board of
Directors must approve such amounts.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 25, 2011

d0718 

# Order

July 25, 2011

142232-3(59)

JASON R. SALENBIEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, and

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Intervening Plaintiff/Cross- Appellant

v SC: 142232-3 COA: 291517, 291543 WCAC: 08-000062 ARROW UNIFORM RENTAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,Defendant-Appellant/CrossAppellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s March 29, 2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously.
**-  Northern Plains  
-  Laramie, Wyoming 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">	You are here: 						Research / 								**Research Project:**GENETIC STUDIES OF RIFT VALLEY FEVER VIRUS VECTORS IN KENYA
**Location: Laramie, Wyoming**
												Project Number: 5410-32000-014-11Project Type:																				Specific Cooperative Agreement

Start Date: Apr 15, 2006End Date: Apr 14, 2011

**Objective:**The main objective of this project is to study the genetics of known Rift Valley Fever Virus (RVFV) vectors in Kenya. We will determine rates of gene flow among populations of known RVFV mosquitoes. Individual mosquitoes will be assayed for virus to look at natural infection rates. Vector competence studies will be conducted when possible. We will attempt to colonize some of the vector species to establish colonies for future studies on the various genetic factors that affect vector competence and transovarial transmission of the virus.
**Approach:**Collection sites will include past RVF outbreak sites and areas known to be endemic for the RVFV as well as sites indicated to be at risk by a model developed by colleagues in Florida.  Distinct genetic differences and/or restrictions to gene flow among populations of mosquitoes found in endemic/outbreak/virus-free areas of the country will be examined. Mosquitoes will be collected as adults, larvae, and eggs. Immature stages will be raised to adulthood. Individual insects will be ground and one aliquot assayed for RVFV using RT-PCR, and another aliquot used to analyze variation in a mitochondrial gene by SSCP or fragment analysis on an ABI sequencer. Vector competence studies will be completed when enough mosquitoes are captured and if they will feed on an artificial membrane feeder. Mosquitoes will be given a RVFV infectious blood meal and assayed for RVFV after the EIP. Rodents will be trapped, bled and tested for antibody to RVFV using ELISA.
    Project TeamBennett, Kristine  
Project Annual Reports FY 2008 FY 2007 FY 2006 
Related National Programs Veterinary, Medical and Urban Entomology(104)  							Last Modified: 11/07/2008 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 19

- 30706 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellant /

Cross

- Appellee **,**

versus **Robert Lee Thompson, Jr.,** Defendant

— Appellee /

Cross

- Appellant

**.**

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:07

- CR

- 30034

- 1

Before **Clement, Higginson,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
In 2008 , Robert Lee Thompson, Jr. , federal prisoner # 66619

- 179, pleaded guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base , and the district court sentenced him to 240 months of imprisonment and a 10

- year term of supervised release . In 2019, t he

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 26, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-30706 Document: 00515616282 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2020No. 19

- 30706

2 district court granted Thompso n ’s motion to be resentenced under the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194 (2018), and re sentenced him to 180 months of imprisonment and an eight

- year term of supervised release

. The Government appeals, arguing that Thompson was i neligible for relief because eligibility for a sentence reduction under Section 404 of the First Step Act is based upon the actual offense conduct rather than the statute of conviction. We generally review a district court’s ruling on a motion for a
sente nce reduction under the First Step Act for abuse of discretion. United States v. Jackson , 945 F.3d 315, 319 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. denied , 2020 WL 1906710 (U.S. Apr. 20, 2020) (No. 19

- 8036). However, when , as here, the district court’s “determination turns on the meaning of a federal statute,” our review is de novo

. Jackson , 945 F.3d at 319 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
T he Government concedes this argument is foreclosed under our decision in J ackson but seeks to preserve the issue for further review

. In that case, we held that “whether an offense is ‘covered’ [under the First Step Act] depends only on the statute under which the defendant was convicted. ” Id

. at 320. We are bound by prior Fif th Circuit decisions until the decision is explicitly or implicitly overruled by the Supreme Court or this court sitting en banc. United States v. Segura , 747 F.3d 323, 3 28 (5th Cir. 2014)

. Accordingly the district court did not err in reducing Thompson’ s sentence under the First Step Act

. S ee Jackson , 945 F.3d at 319

- 20.
T he judgment of the district court is **A FFIRMED** 

. Case: 19-30706 Document: 00515616282 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2020
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results
of operations of the Company for the period indicated.
  /s/ William J. CardenWilliam J. CardenPresident and Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates indicated and results
of operations of the Company for the period indicated.
  /s/ G. Anthony EppolitoG. Anthony EppolitoVice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                     [LETTERHEAD OF SEITZ & DEMARCO, P.C.]


March 21, 2001

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Gentlemen:

We have been furnished with a copy of the Form 10-KSB for the fiscal years ended
February 28, 1998, February 28, 1999, and February 29, 2000, to be filed by
Burzynski Research Institute, Inc. We have reviewed Item 8 of such Form 10-KSB
and agree with the statement made in response to that item insofar as they
relate to our Firm.

Very Truly Yours,


/s/ Russell P. DeMarco

Russell P. DeMarco, CPA
[Signed on Behalf of Seitz & DeMarco, P.C.]
j····· r," ' I
. ·-**~ ·~**  t \_.·:

• •r t,**r~·.** • J -.**·-~** .,_ 11 l \.1 ._ . j ' ,;\ ·-,**'~** 1

### SERVED: MARCH 7, 2013

.**,~··** U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF 

### TRANS STATES AIRLINES LLC FAA DOCKETNo. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS No. FAA-2012-0907
ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed a Complaint onAugust 29, 2012. On August 24, 2012, Trans States Airlines, LLC ("Respondent") had filed a Request for Hearing. OnMarch 7, 2013, Complainantrequested that its Complaint be withdrawn, citing settlement. 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart withprejudice." WHEREFORE, the within filedRequestto Withdraw Complaint having beenread and considered, itis ORDERED as follows: 1. Complainant's Request to Withdraw Complaint be and is hereby granted; and 2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Attachments

- Service List

# (L-Wc.~t Richard C. Goodwin Administrative Law JudgeSERVICE LIST FDMS No. FAA-2012-0907 (Civil Penalty Action)

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY Mr. Richard 

### A Leach, CEO Trans States Airlines, LLC,

### Respondent 11495 Navaid Road, Suite 303 Bridgeton, MO 63044 David J. 

## A. Hayes III, 

### Respondent's Counsel Vice-President & General Counsel Trans States Holdings, Inc. 11495 Navaid Road Bridgeton, MO 63044 TEL: 314-222-4316 FAX: 314-222-4311 David B. Kessler, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ACE-7 Central Region Federal Aviation Administration Room 506, DOT Building 901 Locust Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 TEL: 816-329-3763 FAX: 816-329-3771

1 Service wasbyU.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2FDMS No. FAA-2012-0907 (Civil Penalty Action)

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, AdministrativeLawJudge U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofHearings, M-20, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 StaffAssistant 202-366-5121 FAJ(: 202-366-7536

3
(Reap. Dec. 9965)

#### J. J. Boll, for the a/c of American Roland Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 502540.

(Decided April 5, 1961)

*Eugene R. PicJcrell*for the plaintiff.

*William, E. Orriek, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*650Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise the subject of the above entitled appeal to reappraisement is properly dutiable on the basis of American Selling Price as defined in Section 402(g) Tariff Act of 1930 as amended and that the said American Selling Price was as follows for the export periods indicated.

> Item Period Price

> Folic Acid After 11/1/59 $250.00 per kilo,

> to date less *1%*net packed

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold that American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question, and that such value for the involved item at the time of exportation heretofore indicated was as above set forth in the stipulation of submission herein.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Trump
Entertainment Resorts Holdings, L.P. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Burke, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice
President and Corporate Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 19, 2010



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John P. Burke                               
|John P. Burke                                   
|Chief Financial Officer,                        
|Executive Vice President and Corporate Treasurer
|Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, L.P.