alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT R. GRUDZINSKI, :

: No.4:CV-04-1495

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : (Judge McClure)

:

: (Magistrate Judge Mannion)

SOCIAL SECURITY :

COMMISSIONER, :

Defendant. :

O R D E R

September 21, 2005

BACKGROUND:

This is a civil action brought by the plaintiff, Robert R. Grudzinski, appealing

the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his claim for

Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social

Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433. 

On January 26, 2004, Administrative Law Judge Richard Zack ruled that the

plaintiff was not entitled to DIB. On appeal, plaintiff, who proceeded pro se,

primarily argued that the ALJ’s decision was not supported by substantial

evidence. 

This case was initially referred to United States Magistrate Judge Malachy E.

Mannion. On August 26, 2005, Magistrate Judge Mannion filed his 22-page 

Case 4:04-cv-01495-JFM Document 33 Filed 09/21/05 Page 1 of 2
report and recommendation. At the conclusion of a detailed analysis of the record,

the magistrate judge recommended that the plaintiff’s appeal be denied. 

No objections have been filed to the report and recommendation. 

The court will adopt the report and recommendation in full for the reasons

set forth by Magistrate Judge Mannion.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Malachy E. Mannion (Rec. Doc. No. 32, filed August 26, 2005) is approved and

adopted in full for the reasons set forth therein.

2. Plaintiff’s appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Social

Security is denied and the action of the Commissioner is affirmed.

3. The clerk is directed to close the case file.

 s/ James F. McClure, Jr. 

James F. McClure, Jr.

United States District Judge

 

Case 4:04-cv-01495-JFM Document 33 Filed 09/21/05 Page 2 of 2
#### Mrs. Montye T. PARKER v. Delmar R. JACKSON, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Lavina Maude T. Jackson, Mrs. Sara G. Thompson, and D. F. Calfee, Administrator with Will Annexed of the Estate of Max W. Thompson, Deceased.

No. 50277.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 10, 1978.

Butler, Snow, O’Mara, Stevens & Canna-da, James L. Martin, Herbert C. Ehrhardt, Jackson, for appellant.

McLaurin, Nicols & Kelly, John C. McLaurin, Jr., Brandon, Paul Henderson, Pearl, for appellee.

Before SMITH, P. J., and SUGG and BROOM, JJ.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PATTERSON, C. J., ROBERTSON, P. J., and WALKER, LEE, BOWLING and COF-ER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.1


 


Equity Transfer Agreement


 


The Transferor: Tianjin Binhai Shisheng Trading
Group Co, Ltd


and 


The Transferee: Wu Xiangyang


have entered into agreement as below:


1. The Transferor agrees to transfer
98% of its share in Tianjin Zhengji International Trade Co, Ltd to the Transferee;


2. The Transferee agrees to accept the
98% share of Tianjin Zhengji International Trade Co, Ltd that previously held by the Transferor;


3. The two parties agree to the consideration
of the transfer as RMB 51,749,594.74;


4. After the transfer is closed, the
Transferee shall acquire the right and obligation in Tianjin Zhengji International Trade Co, Ltd to the limit of its equity proportion.


 


Transferor: (signed by Cheng Weihong)


 


Transferee: (signed by Wu Xiangyang)
# 109th AW donates computers to Anderson Center for Autism

/ Published June 27, 2018
STRATTON AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE, N.Y., According to the Defense Logistics Agency*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the 109th Airlift Wing website.*
#### Lige R. PARKER v. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 49993.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 22, 1978.

Derek E. Parker, Jackson, for appellant.

Taylor, Covington, Smith, Matriek & Gibson, Charles E. Gibson, III, Jackson, for appellee.

Before INZER, P. J., SUGG and WALKER, JJ. and KERMIT R. COFER, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23799]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-494-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes In FERC Gas 
Tariff

September 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) 
tendered for filing, as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, proposed to become effective 
September 1, 1997:

Twenty-fifth Revised Sheet No. 8
Twenty-seventh Revised Sheet No. 9
Twenty-sixth Revised Sheet No. 13
Twenty-seventh Revised Sheet No. 16
Thirty-second Revised Sheet No. 18

    ANR states that the above-referenced tariff sheets are being filed 
to implement recovery of approximately $2.5 million of above-market 
costs that are associated with its obligations to Dakota Gasification 
Company (Dakota). ANR proposes a reservation surcharge applicable to 
its Part 284 firm transportation customers to collect ninety percent 
(90%) of the Dakota costs, and an adjustment to the maximum base tariff 
rates of Rate Schedule ITS and overrun rates applicable to Rate 
Schedule FTS-2, so as to recover the remaining ten percent (10%). ANR 
also advises that the proposed changes would increase current quarterly 
Above-Market Dakota Cost recoveries from $2.0 million to $2.5 million 
based upon higher net costs incurred from May, 1997 through July, 1997.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23799 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Billy H. SHEPARD, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, Appellee.

No. II-356.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 25, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 28, 1978.

Roderic G. Magie of Levin, Warfield, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Rosenbloum & Magie, Pensacola, for appellant.

Stephen S. Mathues and Nancy G. Lin-nan, Arthur R. Shell, Jr., Tallahassee, for appellee.

SMITH, Judge.

Shepard, whose employment by the Santa Rosa County sheriff was terminated in February 1977, petitions for review of an order of the Retirement Commission denying him disability retirement benefits. The question before the Commission, was whether Shepard was “totally and permanently disabled,” Section 121.091(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1977), that is to say, whether he was then “prevented, by reason of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment, from rendering useful and efficient service as an officer or employee.” Section 121.091(4)(b).

*209Shepard was a 40 year-old deputy sheriff with 2.4 years of creditable service. His employment was terminated because a cervical injury, received in subduing a criminal suspect, made it dangerous for him to engage in physical combat. There was no medical or other evidence suggesting that Shepard was, in the ordinary sense of the words, “totally and permanently disabled.” Though Shepard was disabled to perform the particular combative duties to which he had previously been assigned, he remains able to perform other duties of public employment within the Retirement System. That his particular employer required all employees to perform combat duties does not qualify Shepard for disability retirement benefits. It is not his physical condition but his former employer’s job description which prevents Shepard from rendering useful and efficient service in that employment.

Reversal of the Retirement Commission’s decision would result in Shepard receiving disability benefits while remaining eligible for other employment as an “officer or employee” member of the Retirement System. Thus, while earning a salary for other useful and efficient service, thereby gaining additional years of creditable service toward another pension from the same system, Shepard would be paid benefits as one disabled. We will not attribute such a purpose to the legislature. An applicant for disability retirement benefits need not prove that his medically determinable disability prevents him from undertaking the most menial or insignificant job within the system far distant from his home; but Shepard, having no medically determinable disability rendering him unfit for decent work available to one of his qualifications at a reasonably convenient place, does not qualify for these extraordinary benefits. See *Amico v. Division of*Retirement, 352 So.2d 556 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and BOOTH, J., concur.
#### Mitchell FALVEY v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50067.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 14, 1977.

Guy & Dowdy, C. Wayne Dowdy, McComb, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Karen A. Gilfoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appel-lee.

Before INZER, P. J., WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pike County; Joe N. Pigott, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concurring.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

Summary of Executive Compensation Notification 

Other Executive Officer – Chief Financial Officer 

2016 Fiscal Year Compensation of Other Named Executive Officer. 

The Board of Directors also established and approved the 2016 fiscal year annual base salary of our other named executive officer. The salary
and other compensation approved are as set forth below in Table II. 
 Table II 

 

									
	 Name
	  	 Office
	  	Annual Base Salary
(2016 Fiscal Year)	 	  	Discretionary
Bonus Plan
(2016 Fiscal Year)
	 Bill W. Wheat
	  	Executive Vice President and CFO	  	$	500,000	  	  	See Note II

 Note II: 

The Board of Directors may award discretionary bonuses to Mr. Wheat based on his performance in fiscal 2016. In addition, Mr. Wheat
may participate in two separate deferred compensation plans. The first plan allows the executive to make voluntary income deferrals. The second plan is a promise by the Company to pay benefits to the executive. If the executive is employed by the
Company on the last day of the current fiscal year (for example September 30, 2016), then the Company will establish a liability to him equal to 10% of his annual base salary as of first day of the current fiscal year (for example
October 1, 2015). This liability will accrue earnings in future years at a rate established by the administrative committee.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Southwest Music Distribution,
      Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB/A for the period
      ended July 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Michery, President and Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                December __, 2006David Michery, President and Chief
                Executive
                Officer
256 La. 259

#### Charlie TOULOUSE, Jr. v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO.

No. 50636.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Travelers Indemnity Co. applying for writ of mandamus, and alternatively writs of certiorari and review.

Writs refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCompositional analysis and classification of projectile residues in LDEF impact cratersThis catalog contains preliminary analyses of residues of hypervelocity projectiles that encountered gold substrates exposed by instrument A0187-1 on the Long Duration Exposure Facility (LDEF). This instrument was on LDEF's trailing edge where relative encounter speeds should be lowest for any non-spinning platform in low Earth orbit (LEO). Approximately 0.6 m(exp 2) of Au substrates yielded 198 impact craters greater than 20 micrometers in diameter. Some 30 percent of the craters were made by natural cosmic dust particles and some 15 percent by man-made objects. Some 50 percent of all features, however, have residues, if any, that are beyond the detection threshold of the SEM-EDXA method used. The purpose of this catalog is to provide detailed evidence and criteria that may be used to arrive at specific particle types on a case-by-case basis and to group such particles into compositional classes. Clearly this is a somewhat interpretative undertaking. For that reason, we encourage and solicit critique and comments from those interested in the systematic analysis of all impact features on LDEF.Document ID19930002186Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHorz, Friedrich*(NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, TX, United States)*Bernhard, Ronald P.*(Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co. Houston, TX., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1992Subject CategorySolar PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-104750S-678NAS 1.15:104750Accession Number93N11374Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930002186.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# L_2013203EN.01001601.xml

| 30.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 203/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 203/16

---

DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

of 24 July 2013

appointing a Judge to the General Court

(2013/407/EU)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 19 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 254 and 255 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the Treaty of Accession of Croatia, Ms Vesna TOMLJENOVIĆ has been appointed as Judge of the General Court for the period from 1 July to 31 August 2013. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the Treaty of Accession of Croatia, Ms Vesna TOMLJENOVIĆ has been appointed as Judge of the General Court for the period from 1 July to 31 August 2013.

| (2) | It has been proposed that the term of office of Ms Vesna TOMLJENOVIĆ as Judge of the General Court be renewed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It has been proposed that the term of office of Ms Vesna TOMLJENOVIĆ as Judge of the General Court be renewed.

| (3) | The panel set up under Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on the suitability of Ms Vesna TOMLJENOVIĆ to perform the duties of Judge of the General Court, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The panel set up under Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on the suitability of Ms Vesna TOMLJENOVIĆ to perform the duties of Judge of the General Court,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Vesna TOMLJENOVIĆ is hereby appointed Judge of the General Court for the period from 1 September 2013 to 31 August 2019.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 24 July 2013.

The President

R. KAROBLIS

---
#### CURRY CORPORATION, a New York corporation, Appellant, v. Alex GREENFIELD and Helen Greenfield, his wife, Appellees.

No. 70-271.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 5, 1970.

Dean, Adams, George & Wood, Miami, for appellant.

Street & Greenfield, Miami, for appel-lees.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents for review the correctness of a reinstatement order entered by the trial judge, after dismissal of the cause for lack of prosecution, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 1.420(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A. We reverse upon the authority of State ex rel. Avery v. Williams, Fla.App.1969, 222 So.2d 477.

The plaintiff in the trial court neglected to show any cause prior to the hearing as to why the matter should not be dismissed. The attempt, after the order of dismissal, was both untimely and insufficient. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Hill, Fla.1955, 76 So.2d 861; Miller v. Hartley’s Inc., Fla. App.1957, 97 So.2d 211; Allen v. Gaither, Fla.App.1959, 112 So.2d 855; Barrentine v. Vulcan Materials Company, Fla.App. 1968, 216 So.2d 59; All State Building Materials, Inc., v. Peoples National Fund, Inc., Fla.App.1969, 219 So.2d 464.

Therefore, for the reasons above stated, the order of reinstatement here under review be and the same is hereby reversed, with directions to dismiss the complaint and the cause.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 134 (Friday, July 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41915-41916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16721]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List Proposed Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed additions to the procurement list.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add a product and services to 
the Procurement List that will be furnished by nonprofit agencies 
employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before: August 12, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 10800, Arlington, Virginia, 
22202-4149.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT COMMENTS CONTACT: Barry S. 
Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email 
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Additions

    If the Committee approves the proposed additions, the entities of 
the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to 
procure the product and services listed below from nonprofit agencies 
employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    The following product and services are proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List for production by the nonprofit agencies listed:

Product

NSN: MR 546--Sponge, All-Purpose, Nylon Mesh, Large.
NPA: New York City Industries for the Blind, Inc., Brooklyn, NY.
Contracting Activity: Military Resale-Defense Commissary Agency 
(DeCA), Fort Lee, VA.
COVERAGE: C-List for the requirements of military commissaries and 
exchanges as aggregated by the Defense Commissary

[[Page 41916]]

Agency.

Services

Service Type/Location: Janitorial Service, Customs and Border 
Protection, Brown Field Air Unit, 7685 Pogo Row, San Diego, CA.
NPA: Job Options, Inc., San Diego, CA.
Contracting Activity: U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, AVIATION, 
MARITIME & BORDER TECHNOLOGIES CONTRACTING DIVISION, WASHINGTON, DC
Service Type/Location: Chemical Latrine Service, NAVFAC-EFA-NW, 1101 
Tautog Circle, Silverdale, WA.
NPA: Skookum Educational Programs, Bremerton, WA.
Contracting Activity: DEPT OF THE NAVY, NAVFAC NORTHWEST, 
SILVERDALE, WA.

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013-16721 Filed 7-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
# Susquehanna distribution center commander praises team’s hurricane response efforts

/ Published Oct. 13, 2017
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., Following nearly two months of facilitating the shipment of critical supplies ultimately distributed amongst those affected by Hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania commander Army Col. Brad Eungard is praising the efforts of his team in meeting the mission while maintaining green metrics in its day to day support to the global warfighter.
With nearly 40 employees deployed to Intermediate Staging Bases in Texas, Alabama and North Carolina to provide on the ground support to FEMA and other government entities moving supplies to hurricane disaster zones, DLA Distribution Susquehanna was still responsible for shipping items to support the relief effort while sending out large volumes of critical items to keep DoD units at full strength and ready for combat operations.  

Eungard says from the beginning of the mission, employees were dedicated to helping in any way possible.  “Many of members of the team voiced a desire to help those recovering from Hurricane Harvey or in the path of Hurricane Irma.  Some had family and friends that had already been impacted by Harvey, while some had family and friends in the Caribbean Islands awaiting Irma’s storm path with concern for their loved ones.”

He continued, saying “I knew at the time that the team’s character and ownership beliefs would embolden us to do everything possible to meet those needs for families and friends.   I asked everyone to dig deep and give their best as we navigated the hurricanes and while continuing to support the warfighters around the world.”

As he has done throughout his entire tour with the distribution center, Eungard continued to stress that the team strive for excellence at every opportunity and remember the organization’s CORE beliefs: Character, Ownership, Respect, and Excellence.

“This team continually expressed some of the desired character qualities within our CORE beliefs.  I’ve witnessed the best of these qualities over the last weeks.  [The team’s] unity of effort, heroic response to critical missions (DDXX, shipments of cots to shelters, etc.), and consistent excellence in supporting support the Warfighter – all were remarkable indicators of tremendous character.”