alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana in the Interest of Debra WAGSTER.

No. 11466.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

July 11, 1977.

See also, La.App., 348 So.2d 751.

Premila B. Chumbley, Asst. Dist. Atty., Baton Rouge, of counsel for State of Louisiana.

*754Donna W. Lee, Baton Rouge, of counsel for defendant-appellant, Debra Wagster.

Before ELLIS, CHIASSON and PONDER, JJ.

CHIASSON, Judge.

Debra Wagster, appellant, a juvenile, has brought this appeal from a decision of the East Baton Rouge Family Court declaring her delinquent and placing her under supervised probation. The record presented to this Court on appeal is incomplete due to the sporadic failure of the device used to record the appellant’s juvenile hearing in accordance with La.R.S. 13:1579. A juvenile court is required by law to record juvenile proceedings and to make the testimony available for transcription. *In re State in Interest of Collins,*La.App., 288 So.2d 918 (1st Cir. 1973); *State in Interest of Aaron,*La.App., 266 So.2d 726 (3rd Cir. 1972).

Among the errors specified by the appellant is the Trial Court’s denial of the appellant’s Motion to Suppress. The evidence sought to be suppressed was obtained pursuant to a search warrant. At issue is whether probable cause existed for the issuance of the warrant. Because the record does not contain the application and affidavit upon which the search warrant was issued and because testimony as to the validity of the allegations on the affidavit was lost due to the failure of the recording equipment the record is so incomplete as to make impossible a determination as to whether evidence was admitted which was obtained as the result of an illegal search and seizure.

Therefore, for the above reasons, the supervised probation of the appellant is set aside and the case remanded for rehearing.

PROBATION SET ASIDE AND REMANDED.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1837 

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

to add Rhode Island to the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 6, 2005 

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 

Management Act to add Rhode Island to the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rhode Island Fisher5 men’s Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADDITION OF RHODE ISLAND TO THE MID-ATLAN7 TIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL. 

8 Section 302(a)(1)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fish9 ery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 

10 1852(a)(1)(B)) is amended— 
2 

•S 1837 IS

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘Rhode Island,’’ after ‘‘States 

2 of’’; 

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘Rhode Island,’’ after ‘‘except 

4 North Carolina,’’; 

5 (3) by striking ‘‘21’’ and inserting ‘‘23’’; and 

6 (4) by striking ‘‘13’’ and inserting ‘‘14’’. 

Æ
# L_2006136EN.01004101.xml

| 24.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 136/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 136/41

---

DECISION TAKEN BY COMMON ACCORD OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES HAVING THE EURO AS THEIR CURRENCY AT THE LEVEL OF HEADS OF STATE OR GOVERNMENT

of 19 May 2006

appointing a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank

(2006/371/EC)

THE HEADS OF STATE OR GOVERNMENT OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY HAVING THE EURO AS THEIR CURRENCY,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 112(2)(b) and 122(4) thereof, and to Articles 11.2 and 43.3 of the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank,

Having regard to the recommendation of the Council (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (3),

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Mr Jürgen STARK is hereby appointed a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank for a term of office of eight years as from 1 June 2006.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 19 May 2006.

The President

U. PLASSNIK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 47, 17.2.2006, p. 58.

1

(2)  Opinion delivered on 17 May 2006 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

2

(3)  
  OJ C 58, 10.3.2006, p. 12.

3

---
**Cotton Ginnings (PCG-BB)
A product of the National Agricultural Statistics Service, Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture**Description:**
**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

CARMELO RIVERA, 

Petitioner 

Civil No. 3:15-cv-1636 

v. 

(Judge Mariani) 

SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI 

HUNTINGDON, et al., 

Respondents 

ORDER 

AND NOW, this::iilJ.. day of August, 2015, for the reasons set forth in the 

Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. 	 The Clerk of Court is directed to TRANSFER the abovecaptioned case to the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 

2. 	 The Clerk of Court is further directed to CLOSE this case. 

Case 3:15-cv-01636-RDM-CA Document 5 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 1
#### Gertrudis MAEDER, Appellant, v. Herman GRAYSON, as Administrator of the Estate of Simon Silverman, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 68-96.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Nov. 19, 1968.

Herbert Wall, Miami, for appellant.

Herman Grayson, Miami Beach, for ap-pellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, C. J., and PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff below, Maeder, filed her complaint for a declaratory decree against Herman Grayson as Administrator of the Estate of Simon Silverman. Grayson filed a motion to dismiss and the trial court entered an order dismissing the complaint with prejudice, relying upon a previous opinion of this court in Grayson v. Maeder, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 796.

Appellant’s first point for reversal does not appear to have been raised in the trial court and cannot be raised for the first time on this appeal. See Marsh v. Sarasota County, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 312.

We note that no action has been taken on the order which remanded the first appeal of this case, supra, with directions to the trial court to dismiss the second amended complaint without prejudice so that Maeder have the opportunity to show, if possible, that she had complied with the applicable statute concerning her equitable claim or have the opportunity to proceed on her legal claim. This case, therefore, is still pending in the trial court.

Notwithstanding the pending case, Mae-der thereafter filed her complaint for declaratory decree which was dismissed with prejudice and is now before us by this appeal.

We affirm the trial court. We find that the plaintiff Maeder is attempting to *243split her cause of action and to have two causes of action against the same party for issues involved in the same cause. This is ordinarily prohibited in Florida. See 1 Fla. Jur. Actions § 42 and case cited therein. This does not mean, however, that plaintiff is without a remedy. She still has pending in the trial court a cause of action against this defendant. She may want to attempt to proceed under that pending cause of action or she may dismiss it and join all of her causes of action against this defendant in one suit and plead in the alternative.

For these reasons, the order of dismissal be and the same is hereby

Affirmed.
# Storerooms emptied by mass e-waste turn-in event 

/ Published Dec. 19, 2018
Nellis AFB, Nevada,
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46737-46738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23413]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-466-000]


Stingray Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

August 28, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 26, 1997, Stingray Pipeline Company 
(Stingray) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third 
Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 178, to be effective 
October 1, 1997.
    Stingray states that the filing was made pursuant to Section 4 of 
the Natural Gas Act, the Commission's Regulations thereunder regarding 
tariff changes, and Order No. 636-C. Specifically, Stingray requested 
to modify Sections 18.2(d)(1) and (d)(3) of the General Terms and 
Conditions of its tariff relating to the right of first refusal to 
provide for a five-year term matching cap instead of the currently 
effective twenty-year term match.
    Stingray requested whatever waivers are necessary to permit the 
tariff sheet to become effective on October 1, 1997.
    Stingray states that a copy of the filing has been mailed to 
Stingray's transportation customers and interested state regulatory 
agencies.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the

[[Page 46738]]

Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must 
be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the public reference room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23413 Filed 9-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Searched for **https://www.wildlifeadaptationstrategy.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.wildlifeadaptationstrategy.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clarence RICHMOND.

No. 62297.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 9, 1978.

In re: Clarence Richmond applying for writs of certiorari or review. Parish of Caddo.

Writ denied.
#### James A. CALLAHAN v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 39120.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
```

[House Report 111-6]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                      111-6

======================================================================

 
 PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 1) MAKING SUPPLEMENTAL 
   APPROPRIATIONS FOR JOB PRESERVATION AND CREATION, INFRASTRUCTURE 
     INVESTMENT, ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND SCIENCE, ASSISTANCE TO THE 
 UNEMPLOYED, AND STATE AND LOCAL FISCAL STABILIZATION, FOR THE FISCAL 
         YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2009, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES

                                _______
                                

  January 26, 2009.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

  Ms. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 88]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 88, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1, the 
``American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.'' The 
resolution provides 3.5 hours of general debate equally divided 
and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Appropriations, who may yield control of 
blocks of that time.
    The resolution waives all points of order against 
consideration of the bill except those arising under clause 9 
or 10 of rule XXI. Finally, the resolution provides that the 
Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion after general 
debate and that no further consideration of the bill shall 
occur except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.

                         EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

    The waiver of all points of order against consideration of 
the bill (except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule 
XXI) includes a waiver of section 303 of the Congressional 
Budget Act (prohibiting consideration of legislation creating 
new budget authority before the concurrent resolution on the 
budget has been agreed to).

                                  

```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1645 

To establish a first responder interoperable communications grant program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2005 

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To establish a first responder interoperable communications 

grant program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘First Responders 

5 Interoperable Communications Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMMUNICATION SYSTEM GRANTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Homeland Secu8 rity is authorized to make grants, on a competitive basis, 

9 to States, local governments, local law enforcement agen10 cies, and local fire departments to assist in— 

2 

•S 1645 IS

1 (1) improving communication systems to allow 

2 for real-time, interoperable communication between 

3 State and local first responders; or 

4 (2) the purchase of communication systems that 

5 allow for real-time, interoperable communication be6 tween such State and local first responders. 

7 (b) APPLICATION.—Any State, local government, 

8 local law enforcement agency, or local fire department that 

9 desires to receive a grant under subsection (a) shall sub10 mit an application to the Secretary, in such form and con11 taining such information as prescribed by the Secretary. 

12 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

13 are authorized to be appropriated $300,000,000 in each 

14 of fiscal years 2006 through 2010, to carry out this sec15 tion. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1275 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1275

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
7172 North Tongass Highway, Ward Cove, Alaska, as the ``Alice R. Brusich 
                         Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALICE R. BRUSICH POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 7172 North Tongass Highway, in Ward Cove, Alaska, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Alice R. Brusich Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Alice R. 
Brusich Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Case 4:04-cv-02235-TMB Document 48 Filed 11/23/05 Page 1 of 1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMore on exact state reconstruction in deterministic digital control systemsPresented is a special form of the Ideal State Reconstructor for deterministic digital control systems which is simpler to implement than the most general form. The Ideal State Reconstructor is so named because, if the plant parameters are known exactly, its output will exactly equal, not just approximate, the true state of the plant and accomplish this without any knowledge of the plant's initial state. Besides this, it adds no new states or eigenvalues to the system. Nor does it affect the plant equation for the system in any way; it affects the measurement equation only. It is characterized by the fact that discrete measurements are generated every T/N seconds and input into a multi-input/multi-output moving-average (MA) process. The output of this process is sampled every T seconds and utilized in reconstructing the state of the system.Document ID19880018793Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsPolites, Michael E.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1988Subject CategoryEngineering (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA-TP-2847NAS 1.60:2847Accession Number88N28177Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880018793.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

CHERIE ROER, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 22-10175 

D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00084-LEK-2 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 14, 2023**

Before: SILVERMAN, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. 

Cherie Roer appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges two 

conditions of supervised release imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for 

drug offenses. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for plain 

error, see United States v. Wolf Child, 699 F.3d 1082, 1089 (9th Cir. 2012), and we

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 21 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 22-10175 

affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand. 

Roer first challenges the special condition requiring her to participate in a 

mental health assessment. Although Roer has made commendable rehabilitative 

efforts, it is apparent that the district court adopted probation’s recommendation to 

impose the challenged condition in light of Roer’s history of mental health issues. 

See id. at 1090 (district court need not state its reasons for imposing a supervised 

released condition when the reasoning is apparent from the record). Moreover, the

condition is proper because it is reasonably related to her rehabilitation and does 

not involve a greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary. See 18 

U.S.C. § 3583(d); United States v. Rearden, 349 F.3d 608, 618 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Roer also challenges standard condition eight, which prohibits Roer from 

interacting with known felons without prior approval, because it implicates her 

right to associate with her husband. As the government concedes, the district court 

plainly erred by failing to explain its reasons for imposing this condition. See Wolf 

Child, 699 F.3d at 1090-92 (describing enhanced procedural requirements the court 

must follow when imposing a condition that restricts a defendant’s particularly 

significant liberty interest in familial association). Accordingly, we vacate the 

condition and remand for the court to exempt Roer’s husband or make the requisite 

findings as why it should apply to him. See id. at 1103.

AFFIRMED in part; VACATED in part; and REMANDED.
### Minor elements in alluvial magnetite from the Inner Piedmont belt, North and South Carolina

By: P. K. Theobald Jr.W.C. OverstreetC. E. Thompson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp554A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.