alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         149,175                  14,554
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,028                  41,971
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,020                   3,675
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               186,781                  60,875
<PP&E>                                          52,417                  85,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,678                   8,253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 542,044                 754,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,708                  24,687
<BONDS>                                        175,086                 284,749
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          1                       1
<COMMON>                                           192                     210
<OTHER-SE>                                     333,709                 395,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   542,044                 395,854
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,426                 113,582
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,696                  78,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,179                  19,459
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   898                   1,569
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,964                  15,217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,191                   5,650
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,436                   2,961
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,755                   2,689
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,755                     121
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11                   (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11                     .04


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 13**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Progen Pharmaceuticals Limited, a company organized under the laws of the State of Queensland, Australia (the “Company”), does hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge that:

 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2011 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Progen Pharmaceuticals Limited and will be retained by Progen Pharmaceuticals Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated:    November 29, 2011 | /s/ Stuart James                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                            | Chairman and Acting Chief Executive Officer      |
|                                            |                                             |
| Dated:    November 29, 2011 | /s/ Paul G.E.J Dixon                             |
|                                            | General Manager of Finance and Company Secretary |

 

----
Skip Navigation

# 

## BlackwaterNational Wildlife Refuge  |   Maryland

SearchAll Refuges

          - Visit             - Plan Your Visit
            - Rules and Regulations
            - Just for Kids
            - Visitor Activities
            - Law Enforcement
            - For Educators
            - Permits
            - Events Calendar
          - Wildlife & Habitat
          - Seasons of Wildlife
          - About the Refuge

## Final CCP

The final comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) can be accessed below by its individual chapters and appendixes. These files are at a lower resolution than the print or cd-rom versions of the document in order to reduce the file sizes and facilitate downloading. As a result, the quality of the many maps and photos may not be as clear as in the printed version.

These files are in .pdf format and require Adobe Acrobat Reader to view. To download a free version of this software, please visit Adobe Acrobat Reader.

                - Cover Page
                - Chapter 1 - Introduction
                - Chapter 2 - Planning Process
                - Chapter 3 - Refuge and Resource Descriptions
                - Chapter 4 - Management Direction
                - Chapter 5 - Administration
                - Glossary
                - Bibliography
                - List of Preparers
                - Appendix A - Responses to Substantive Comments
                - Appendix B - Land Protection Plan
                - Appendix C - Rare Species in the Nanticoke River Watershed
                - Appendix D - Organization Charts
                - Appendix E - Compatibility Determinations
                - Appendix F - Wilderness Review
                - Back Cover
                - Entire Document

            - Conservation
            - Final CCP
            - Draft CCP / EA
            - CCP Newsletters

            - Share
            - Alert - Refuge Closures
            - Follow Us Online               - Facebook Page
              - Twitter Feed
              - YouTube Page
              - Flickr Page
              - RSS Feed
            - Maps
            - Multimedia

### What We Do

              - Resource Management
              - Conservation
              - Get Involved
              - Partnerships

### Delmarva Peninsula Fox Squirrel

The Delmarva peninsula fox squirrel (DFS) is a large tree squirrel that lives in mature hardwood and pine forests throughout the Delmarva peninsula. Recently removed from the endangered species list, this squirrel is still a rarity on the eastern shore, with Blackwater refuge hosting the largest natural population.

Learn more

Return to main navigation
        - Blackwater Home
        - Regional Office
        - Refuges/Districts Nearby
        - Contact Us

##### U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

##### National Wildlife Refuge System

            - Notices 
            - Accessibility 
            - Disclaimer 
            - Privacy 
            - FOIA 

##### Department of the Interior

##### USA.gov
#### Smiley Vincent KEENE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-558.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

June 18, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 13,1969.

Robert W. Rawlins, Public Defender, and John M. Gilbert, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PIERCE, Judge.

In May, 1965, appellant Keene was convicted by a jury after trial upon an information charging robbery, and was thereupon sentenced to a term of 30 years imprisonment.

On October 7, 1968 he filed his motion to vacate the conviction and sentence under CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A. This motion was summarily denied on October 16, 1968. The only allegation alleged in the motion that warrants discussion here was that his trial-appointed counsel did not advise him of “his right to appeal the decision of the *177Court.” We will assume he meant the judgment of conviction entered against him after trial.

No showing is made in the motion of any alleged error or irregularity of the trial proceedings that might reasonably have brought about a reversal of the judgment upon direct appeal. This Court has recently held, in Barnett v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 222 So.2d 30, that a motion so filed must contain such allegation, specifying the substantial error or irregularity relied upon. In *Barnett*it was shown that all four District Courts of Appeal have now held uniformly on this point.

Upon authority of *Barnett*and the cases therein cited, the order appealed from is

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and MANN, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          51,634
<SECURITIES>                                     4,994
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        174
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,012
<PP&E>                                           6,123
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,719
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,777
<BONDS>                                          2,165
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21 
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,895
<SALES>                                         55,962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,529
<CGS>                                           47,852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  36
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,644
<INCOME-TAX>                                       674
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                970
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       970
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1736 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 Union Calendar No. 251
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1736

                          [Report No. 109-449]


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2005

             Referred to the Committee on Government Reform

                              May 2, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To provide for the participation of employees in the judicial branch in 
   the Federal leave transfer program for disasters and emergencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEAVE TRANSFER PROGRAM IN DISASTERS AND EMERGENCIES.

    Section 6391 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
    ``(f) After consultation with the Administrative Office of the 
United States Courts, the Office of Personnel Management shall provide 
for the participation of employees in the judicial branch in any 
emergency leave transfer program under this section.''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 251

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1736

                          [Report No. 109-449]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To provide for the participation of employees in the judicial branch in 
   the Federal leave transfer program for disasters and emergencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 2, 2006

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed`
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23286]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Division 
of Extramural Activities; Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: September 8, 1997.
    Time: 11 a.m.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20814, (301) 657-1234.
    Contact Person: Dr. Katherine Woodbury, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NINDS, National Institutes 
of Health, 7550 Wisconsin Avenue, Room 9C10, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 496-9223.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate one grant application.
    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.853, Clinical 
Research Related to Neurological Disorders, No. 93.854, Biological 
Basis Research in the Neurosciences)

    Dated: August 26, 1997.
LaVeen M. Ponds,
Policy Analyst, National Institutes of Health, Committee Management 
Office.
[FR Doc. 97-23286 Filed 9-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
255 La. 558

#### FINE ARTS CENTER and Museum of Old Imperial Calcasieu, Inc., Frank R. Gibson, Edith G. Gibson, Garnett E. Barham and Jane G. Barham v. CITY OF LAKE CHARLES.

No. 50392.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 12, 1970.

In re: City of Lake Charles applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 229 So.2d 773.

Writ refused. Considering all circumstances of the case, we cannot say that the result reached by the Court of Appeal is incorrect.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4787-4788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2295]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Preparation of a Joint Environmental Impact Statement /
Environmental Impact Report for Federal and State Actions Associated 
With Furthering the Purposes of the September 28, 1996, Agreement 
Between the United States, State of California, and MAXXAM, Inc. and 
its Subsidiary, Pacific Lumber Company

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of additional hours for participation in a public 
scoping meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As specified in the official Notice of Intent (FR, Vol. 61, 
No. 250, p. 68285), a public scoping meeting is scheduled for 
Wednesday, February 5, 1997, Redwood Acres Fairgrounds, Franceschi 
Hall, 3750 Harris Street, Eureka, California from 1:00 p.m. to no later 
than 4:00 p.m., and from 6:00 p.m. to no later than 9:00 p.m. This 
notice announces that additional hours to participate in the public 
scoping meeting have been scheduled for the same date and location. The 
public scoping meeting will now be held from 9 a.m. to no later than 11 
a.m., from 1 p.m. to no later than 4 p.m., and from 6 p.m. to no later 
than 9 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Comments regarding the scope of the EIS should be addressed 
to Mr. Bruce Halstead, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1125 16th 
Street, Room 209, Arcata, CA 95521-5582. Comments should be received on 
or

[[Page 4788]]

before February 18, 1997, at the above address. Written comments may 
also be sent by facsimile to (707) 822-8136. Comments received will be 
available for public inspection by appointment during normal business 
hours (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday) at the above 
office; please call for an appointment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Mackey, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Region 1, 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon, Telephone: 
(503) 231-6241.

    Dated: January 23, 1997.
Thomas J. Dwyer,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 97-2295 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEFINA SON TECUM, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-71334 

Agency No. A208-130-656 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 19, 2019**

Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Josefina Son Tecum, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum and withholding 

of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 26 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

Son Tecum does not make any argument challenging the agency’s 

dispositive conclusion that her proposed social group of “young school-aged 

women being targeted by gangs” is not cognizable. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 

94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in 

a party’s opening brief are waived).

Even considering the claimed social group as one of “young school-aged 

women”, substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Son Tecum

failed to establish that she was or would be persecuted on account of her 

membership in that group. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 

2010) (an applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by 

theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). 

Thus, Son Tecum’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

US ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND US ONCOLOGY, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of US Oncology Holdings, Inc. (the Company) and US Oncology, Inc. on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce D. Broussard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Bruce D. Broussard                                                      
|Bruce D. Broussard,                                                         
|Chief Executive Officer of US Oncology Holdings, Inc. and US. Oncology, Inc.
|                                                                            
|March 11, 2009
Order entered December 6, 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01456

- CV

IN RE MICHAEL A. RUFF, Relator

O rigina l Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas C ounty, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR

- 11

- 02825

- 1



### O RDER

Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Schenck

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs, if any, of this original p roceeding.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE