alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS108334 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             360
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   360
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              360
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           885
<OTHER-SE>                                        (885)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       360
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    27
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (27)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (27)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (27)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Robert Waters, Director and the Chief Financial Officer of Golden Spirit
Minerals Ltd., a Delaware Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 17, 2004


/s/ Robert Waters
-----------------
Robert Waters

Director and Chief Financial Officer
255 La. 243

#### Ted KOGOS v. Louis J. RITTINER, Joseph W. Nelkin, and Irwin, Seelig & Nelkin.

No. 50296.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1970.

In re: Joseph Nelkin applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 228 So.2d 62.

Not considered. The application was not timely filed. See Art. 7, Sect. 11, La.Const.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         150,092
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,092
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 418,365
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,637
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   418,365
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               360,545
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (353,367)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (353,367)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (353,367)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
No. 00-7129.

#### Wilson *v.*Alabama.

Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied.
# L_2004297EN.01001701.xml

| 22.9.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 297/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 297/17

---

DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

of 14 July 2004

appointing judges at the Court of First Instance of the European Communities

(2004/646/EC, Euratom)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 224 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 140 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The terms of office of Mr DEHOUSSE, Mr VESTERDORF, Ms JÜRIMÄE, Mr VILARAS, Mr PAPASAVVAS, Mr JAEGER, Mr CZÚCZ, Mr MEIJ, Mr AZIZI, Ms WISZNIEWSKA-BIAŁECKA, Ms MARTINS de NAZARÉ RIBEIRO, Mr ŠVÁBY and Ms TIILI as judges at the Court of First Instance are due to end on 31 August 2004. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The terms of office of Mr DEHOUSSE, Mr VESTERDORF, Ms JÜRIMÄE, Mr VILARAS, Mr PAPASAVVAS, Mr JAEGER, Mr CZÚCZ, Mr MEIJ, Mr AZIZI, Ms WISZNIEWSKA-BIAŁECKA, Ms MARTINS de NAZARÉ RIBEIRO, Mr ŠVÁBY and Ms TIILI as judges at the Court of First Instance are due to end on 31 August 2004.

| (2) | The membership of the Court of First Instance should be renewed in part for the period from 1 September 2004 to 31 August 2010, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The membership of the Court of First Instance should be renewed in part for the period from 1 September 2004 to 31 August 2010,

HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed judges at the Court of First Instance for the period from 1 September 2004 to 31 August 2010:

| | Mr Franklin DEHOUSSE |
| --- | --- |

Mr Franklin DEHOUSSE

| | Mr Bo VESTERDORF |
| --- | --- |

Mr Bo VESTERDORF

| | Ms Küllike JÜRIMÄE |
| --- | --- |

Ms Küllike JÜRIMÄE

| | Mr Mihalis VILARAS |
| --- | --- |

Mr Mihalis VILARAS

| | Mr Savvas S. PAPASAVVAS |
| --- | --- |

Mr Savvas S. PAPASAVVAS

| | Mr Marc JAEGER |
| --- | --- |

Mr Marc JAEGER

| | Mr Ottó CZÚCZ |
| --- | --- |

Mr Ottó CZÚCZ

| | Mr Arjen Willem Hendrik MEIJ |
| --- | --- |

Mr Arjen Willem Hendrik MEIJ

| | Mr Josef AZIZI |
| --- | --- |

Mr Josef AZIZI

| | Ms Irena WISZNIEWSKA-BIAŁECKA |
| --- | --- |

Ms Irena WISZNIEWSKA-BIAŁECKA

| | Ms Maria Eugénia MARTINS de NAZARÉ RIBEIRO |
| --- | --- |

Ms Maria Eugénia MARTINS de NAZARÉ RIBEIRO

| | Mr Daniel ŠVÁBY |
| --- | --- |

Mr Daniel ŠVÁBY

| | Ms Virpi TIILI |
| --- | --- |

Ms Virpi TIILI

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 July 2004.

For the Council

The President

T. DE BRUIJN

---
#### Rose Pareti, widow of Morris L. TAQUINO v. W. F. MINCHEN and E. S. Morrison.

No. 60076.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 2, 1977.

In re: Rose Pareti, widow of Morris L. Taquino applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans, 345 So.2d 570.

Writ denied. Judgment of the court of appeal is correct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                    0001075907
<NAME>                        INTRACO SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1
<CURRENCY>                                      USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                                1,316,780
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                           785,624
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                              56,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      2,240,380
<PP&E>                                1,270,404
<DEPRECIATION>                         (243,610)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        3,489,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,083,320
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                               1,369
<COMMON>                                 17,386
<OTHER-SE>                            2,363,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          3,489,928
<SALES>                               4,357,283
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      4,357,283
<CGS>                                 3,627,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         7,304,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         (9,408)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      (68,256)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (2,869,470)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (2,869,470)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                         (2,869,470)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.18)


</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnalysis of airborne Doppler lidar, Doppler radar and tall tower measurements of atmospheric flows in quiescent and stormy weatherThe first experiment to combine airborne Doppler Lidar and ground-based dual Doppler Radar measurements of wind to detail the lower tropospheric flows in quiescent and stormy weather was conducted in central Oklahoma during four days in June-July 1981. Data from these unique remote sensing instruments, coupled with data from conventional in-situ facilities, i.e., 500-m meteorological tower, rawinsonde, and surface based sensors, were analyzed to enhance understanding of wind, waves and turbulence. The purposes of the study were to: (1) compare winds mapped by ground-based dual Doppler radars, airborne Doppler lidar, and anemometers on a tower; (2) compare measured atmospheric boundary layer flow with flows predicted by theoretical models; (3) investigate the kinematic structure of air mass boundaries that precede the development of severe storms; and (4) study the kinematic structure of thunderstorm phenomena (downdrafts, gust fronts, etc.) that produce wind shear and turbulence hazardous to aircraft operations. The report consists of three parts: Part 1, Intercomparison of Wind Data from Airborne Lidar, Ground-Based Radars and Instrumented 444 m Tower; Part 2, The Structure of the Convective Atmospheric Boundary Layer as Revealed by Lidar and Doppler Radars; and Part 3, Doppler Lidar Observations in Thunderstorm Environments.Document ID19860013688Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBluestein, H. B.*(Oklahoma Univ. Norman, OK, United States)*Doviak, R. J.*(Oklahoma Univ. Norman, OK, United States)*Eilts, M. D.*(Oklahoma Univ. Norman, OK, United States)*Mccaul, E. W.*(Oklahoma Univ. Norman, OK, United States)*Rabin, R.*(Oklahoma Univ. Norman, OK, United States)*Sundara-Rajan, A.*(Oklahoma Univ. Norman, OK, United States)*Zrnic, D. S.*(Oklahoma Univ. Norman, OK, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1986Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryMeteorology And ClimatologyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:3960NASA-CR-3960Accession Number86N23159Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-34749Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860013688.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30181 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RONNY OSBIN CUMMINGS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-45D

- - - - - - - - - - December 18, 1996 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ronny Osbin Cummings appeals from his conviction and sentence for carjacking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2119. He argues that his conviction is unconstitutional because it is based upon an insufficient nexus with interstate commerce, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, that the district court’s assessment of a two-level increase pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(1)(B) violated principles of double jeopardy, and thatNo. 96-30181 - 2 - the district court erred by increasing his offense level by two pursuant to § 3A1.1 because his victim was unusually vulnerable. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. The factual resume provides that the vehicle had moved in interstate commerce, and Cummings does not challenge the sufficiency of the factual resume on appeal. The district court did not err by increasing Cummings’ offense level pursuant to § 2B3.1(b)(1)(B).
See United States v. Hawkins , 87 F.3d 722, 724-28 (5th Cir. 1996). Neither did the district court err by increasing Cummings’ offense level by two pursuant to § 3A1.1 because his victim was unusually vulnerable. See United States v. Kuban , 94 F.3d 971, 975 (5th Cir. 1996). Finally, the court declines to address Cummings’ claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, although without prejudice to Cummings’ right to raise the issue in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant



SafeCard Services, Incorporated.

Wright Express Corporation

National Leisure Group, Inc.

Family Protection Network, Inc.

Ideon Marketing and Services Company

SafeCard  Services  Insurance  Company  (subsidiary  of SafeCard  Services,
Incorporated)

SafeCard Travel Services,  Incorporated  (subsidiary of SafeCard  Services,
Incorporated)

SafeCard Technologies, Inc. (subsidiary of SafeCard Services, Incorporated)

MCM Group, Ltd (subsidiary of SafeCard Services, Incorporated)

United Bank Club Association, Inc. (subsidiary of MCM Group, Ltd)

Present Value Services, Ltd (subsidiary of United Bank Club Association, Inc.)
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-87,085-03

EX PARTE RUTHEN JAMES WEEMS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2015-229-C2C IN THE 54 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM MCLENNAN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of one count of aggravated assault and one count of unlawful

possession of a firearm and sentenced to life and ten years’ imprisonment respectively. The Tenth

Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Weems v. State, No. 10-17-00404-CR (Tex.

App.—Waco April 10, 2019)(not designated for publication). 

The Court received this writ application on January 13, 2020. On February 26, 2020,

this Court dismissed it as subsequent. TEX. CODE CRIM. PRO. Art. 11.07, sec. 4. However,

it has now come to the Court’s attention that Applicant’s prior habeas application should

have been dismissed, not denied. Due to that error, this application would no longer be
2

considered subsequent and should be addressed on the merits. Accordingly, the Court

withdrawsits prior ruling which dismissed this application without written order, reopens the

application, and enters this order remanding the application.

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective in sixteen different

grounds. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v.

Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is

the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX.CODECRIM.PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to all of Applicant’s claims of ineffective counsel. In developing

the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects

to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and

wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent at the hearing. 

See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall

immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whethertrial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any other

findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s. The trial court shall

also make a ruling on Applicant’s request to exceed the page limits for his memorandum of law.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
3

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 29, 2020

Do not publish
ex10-90.htm


Exhibit 10.90

 

 

EXTENSION OF MATURITY DATE OF WARRANTS

 

This Extension of Maturity Date of Warrants (“Extension”) is by and between the individual or entity named on the executed counterpart of the signature page hereto (such signatory is referred to as “Holder”) and OmniComm Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Maker”) and is entered into as of the day the Holder executes a copy of this Extension.

 

WHEREAS, Maker has delivered to Holder that certain 12% Promissory Note of the Maker (“Promissory Note”) dated January 31, 2015 in the aggregate to the Holder in the principal of $2,860,000. 

 

WHEREAS, the Maturity Date of the Promissory Note, as that term is defined in the Promissory Note, was April 01, 2017, and the principal due thereunder remains unpaid as of the date hereof.

 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the Maturity Date of the Promissory Note to January 01, 2019.

 

WHEREAS, Holder has all requisite power, authority, and capacity to enter into this Extension and to extend the Maturity Date of the Warrants.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Holder and the Maker hereby agree as follows:

 

	 	
1.
	
Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.



 

	 	
2.
	
No Other Changes. Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Promissory Note remain in full force and effect.



 

	 	
3.
	
Warrants Extension. Maker hereby agrees to extend the expiration date on the Warrants issued in connection with the $2,860,000 of principal from the Promissory Note on January 31, 2015, which were originally scheduled to expire on April 01, 2017. The new expiration date is January 01, 2019.



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Extension of Maturity Date of the Warrants associated with the Promissory Note is executed as of the day and date the Holder executes a copy of this Extension.

 

	
 
	
OmniComm Systems, Inc.
	
 

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Thomas E. Vickers
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Thomas E. Vickers
	
 

	 	 	Chief Financial Officer	 
	 	 	 	 


 

 

[HOLDERS SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

 


 

 




 


Exhibit 10.90 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned represents that it has caused this extension of Maturity Date of Warrants to be duly executed on its behalf (if an entity, by one of its officers thereunto duly authorized) as of the date written below.

 

	
 
	
HOLDER:  
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	 	 	 	 
	 	Cornelis F. Wit	 
	 	Printed Name of Holder	 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Cornelis F. Wit	 
	 	(Signature of Holder or Authorized Person)	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Printed Name and Title if Authorized Person	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	October 15, 2015	 
	 	Date
Case 3:15-cv-01815-EMK-LQ Document 17 Filed 06/20/16 Page 1 of 1
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

ADRIAN ALEXANDER LESTER , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 217

[ July 27, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Cynthia L. Cox

, Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 312013CF000519A

, 312013CF000520A

, 312013CF000794A , and 312014CF000391A

.
Philip J. Massa, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance filed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirme d.

G ERBER , C.J., D AMOORGIAN and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.