alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Harry Stylli, Chief Executive Officer of Sequenom, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Quarterly Report)
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d), of the Exchange Act, and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Quarterly Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has set their hands hereto as of the 6th day of August, 2009.



/S/ HARRY STYLLIHarry StylliChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOEY M. MORALES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 175 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

 

Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCCQ-11-0000747 

28-NOV-2011 

12:29 PM 

NO. SCCQ-11-0000747
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

BERT VILLON and MARK APANA, Plaintiffs,
 

vs.
 

MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., dba WAILEA MARRIOTT RESORT,


Defendant.
 

RENELDO RODRIGUEZ and JOHNSON BASLER, on behalf of


themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
 

vs.
 

STARWOOD HOTELS & RESORTS WORLDWIDE, INC.,


dba WESTIN MAUI RESORT & SPA, Defendant.
 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
 

ORDER
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
 

Upon consideration of the plaintiffs' motion for
 

reconsideration of the November 8, 2011 ruling on the certified
 

question, it appears that the motion for reconsideration -- filed
 

on November 21, 2011 -- was not filed within 10 days after the
 

filing of the November 8, 2011 ruling. See HRAP 40(a) ("A motion
 

for reconsideration may be filed by a party only within 10 days
 

after the filing of the opinion, dispositional order, or ruling
 
unless by special leave additional time is granted during such
 

period by a judge or justice of the appellate court involved."). 


Therefore,
 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for
 

reconsideration is denied as untimely.
 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, November 28, 2011. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. 

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

2
July 14, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DIMPLE SHAW, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00638-CR

NO. 14-15-00639-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Dimple Shaw.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Rosalee PETERSON, etc., Appellant, v. MIDWESTERN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 76-1962.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 15, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 21, 1977.

Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Sikes, Greene & Cooper and Robyn Greene, Miami, for appellant.

Thornton, Conroy & Herndon, P. A., and John W. Thornton and Nancy J. Cliff, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and HAVER-FIELD and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Cloud*v. *Fallis,*110 So.2d 669, 673 (Fla.1959); *City of Miami v. Veargis,*311 So.2d 693, 694 (Fla.3d DCA 1975).
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2038 

To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to restore the original 

deadline for mandatory country of origin labeling. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2005 

Mr. BURNS (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. THUNE, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. ENZI, 

Mr. THOMAS, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. DORGAN, 

Mr. CONRAD, Mr. BYRD, and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to restore 

the original deadline for mandatory country of origin 

labeling. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COUNTRY OF ORIGIN LABELING. 

4 Section 285 of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 

5 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1638d) is amended by striking ‘‘2008’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘2006’’. 

Æ
No. 00-7032.

#### McDeid *v.*O’Keefe, Minnesota Commissioner of Human Services.

Ct. App. Minn. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, INC. CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
24 WEEKS ENDED JUNE 12, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001076405
<NAME>                        THE PEPSI BOTTLING GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-12-1999
<CASH>                                         57
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                   52
<INVENTORY>                                    341
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,584
<PP&E>                                         4,597
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,052
<BONDS>                                        3,279
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,614
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,730
<SALES>                                        3,283
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,283
<CGS>                                          1,881
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,881
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               6
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             97
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                30
<INCOME-TAX>                                   13
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            17
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   17
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.18



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 178 (Monday, September 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24365]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-291-004]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

September 9, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 4, 1997, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on Appendix A 
attached to the filing, proposed to be effective September 14, 1997.
    Panhandle asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's order issued August 5, 1997 in Docket No. RP97-291-
001, et al., 80 FERC para. 61,198 (1997).
    Panhandle states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers, applicable state regulatory agencies and all 
parties to this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24365 Filed 9-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000942789
<NAME> VALRICO BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,454
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,356
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      6,783
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,049
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,140
<LOANS>                                         56,535
<ALLOWANCE>                                        776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,685
<DEPOSITS>                                      70,505
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,146
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                475
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           308
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  80,685
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,660
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  473
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   265
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,398
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,932
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 259
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,207
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      210
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,051
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    879
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         879
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       579
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.88
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.08
<LOANS-NON>                                        163
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    189
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   576
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       24
<RECOVERIES>                                        14
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  776
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               776
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2442]



[[Page 4769]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Dkt. C-3657]


Mrs. Fields Cookies, Inc.; Prohibited Trade Practices, and 
Affirmative Corrective Actions

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.

ACTION: Consent order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In settlement of alleged violations of federal law prohibiting 
unfair or deceptive acts or practices and unfair methods of 
competition, this consent order prohibits, among other things, the 
Utah-based corporation from misrepresenting the fat, saturated fat, 
cholesterol or caloric content of baked food products.

DATES: Complaint and Order issued May 13, 1996.\1\

    \1\ Copies of the Complaint and the Decision and Order are 
available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, H-130, 6th 
Street & Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Phoebe Morse, Federal Trade Commission, Boston Regional Office, 101 
Merrimac Street, Suite 810, Boston, MA. 02114-4719. (617)424-5960.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On Wednesday, March 6, 1996, there was 
published in the Federal Register, 61 FR 8939, a proposed consent 
agreement with analysis In the Matter of Mrs. Fields Cookies, Inc., for 
the purpose of soliciting public comment. Interested parties were given 
sixty (60) days in which to submit comments, suggestions or objections 
regarding the proposed form of the order. No comments having been 
received, the Commission has ordered the issuance of the complaint in 
the form contemplated by the agreement, made its jurisdictional 
findings and entered an order to cease and desist, as set forth in the 
proposed consent agreement, in disposition of this proceeding.

(Sec. 6, 38 Stat. 721; 15 U.S.C. 46. Interprets or applies sec. 5, 
38 Stat. 719, as amended; 15 U.S.C. 45, 52)
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-2442 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23797]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-492-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Filing of Tariff 
Sheets

September 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas) tendered for filing, as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1 the following tariff sheet:

First Revised Sheet No. 221

    Texas Gas states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's Order No. 636-C issued February 27, 1997, in Docket 
No. RM91-11-006, et al. Texas Gas states that it has revised its right-
of-first-refusal tariff provisions to reduce the term cap for matching 
a competitive bid from twenty (20) years to five (5) years.
    Texas Gas states that copies of the tariff sheets are being served 
upon Texas Gas jurisdictional customers and interested state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to the 
proceeding must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection in 
the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23797 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Hardy W. HOWARD v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY.

No. 12039.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

June 12, 1978.

*229Michael R. Connelly, Baton Rouge, of counsel for plaintiff-appellant Hardy W. Howard.

Michael C. Barron, Baton Rouge, of counsel for defendant-appellee Louisiana Dept, of Public Safety.

Before LOTTINGER, EDWARDS and PONDER, JJ.

LOTTINGER, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks a restricted driver’s license under LSA-R.S. 32:415.1. From a judgment dismissing his petition, plaintiff has appealed.

On January 24, 1973, plaintiff pleaded guilty to a DWI charge and his driver’s license was suspended for one year. Apparently, subsequent to the effective date of Act 618 of 1976, Regular Session, plaintiff’s driver’s license was again suspended for driving while under the influence of alcoholic beverages. In dismissing plaintiff’s suit the trial judge said: “because Mr. Howard’s license was not suspended for the first time when he applied for the restricted driver’s license, his petition is hereby denied”.

In appealing plaintiff contends the trial judge erred (1) in applying LSA-R.S. 32:415.1 retroactively, since his first suspension occurred prior to the effective date thereof, and (2) by dismissing his petition denied him due process.

ERROR NO. 1

Appellant argues the general rule that statutes are to be applied prospectively rather than retroactively, thus in determining what is the first suspension under LSA-R.S. 32:415.1, only those suspensions after the effective date of Act 618 of 1976 can be considered.

We are convinced the legislature intended a retroactive application of this statute. LSA-R.S. 32:415.1 A (2) specifically allowed the granting of a restricted driver’s license for a suspension invoked prior to the effective date. The legislative mandate is clear that LSA-R.S. 32:415.1 only applies to “first time” suspensions. *Smith v. State, Dept. of Public Safety,*352 So.2d 443 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1977).

ERROR NO. 2

Appellant argues that the trial judge’s interpretation of the statute discriminates against him on an arbitrary basis, and thus he is denied due process.

We above agreed with the interpretation of LSA-R.S. 32:415.1 by the trial judge, as to the intention of the legislature. Prior to the enactment of this statute, there did not exist the availability of the restricted driver’s license. The legislature saw a need for a partial reprieve from the hardships caused by the suspension of driving privileges, and granted this partial reprieve to first time only suspensions. We cannot envision how a reprieve to first time only suspensions is a denial of due process.

Therefore, for the above and foregoing reasons the judgment of the trial court is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Life Time
Fitness, Inc.
 Dated: May 5, 2006/s/ Bahram AkradiBahram AkradiChairman of the Board of Directors, President andChief Executive Officer/s/ Michael R. RobinsonMichael R. RobinsonExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### James C. LEE v. Audrey S. LEE.

No. 45663.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 23, 1970.

W. S. Moore, Jackson, for appellant.

Waller & Fox, Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
254 La. 513

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Louis KING v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 49967.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 21, 1969.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
#### WEEKI WACHEE ORCHID GARDENS, INC., a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA INLAND THEATRES, INC., (Successor to St. Petersburg Springs Co.), a Florida corporation, Respondent.

No. 40427.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 4, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 14, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 239 So.2d 602.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Board of Directors of TC PipeLines GP, Inc., General Partner ofTC PipeLines, LP:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements (No. 333-121537 and No. 333-141488) on Form S-3 of TC PipeLines, LP,of our report dated April 25, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balancesheets of TC PipeLines GP, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, which reportappears in Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 10-Q of TC PipeLines, LP dated April 30,2007.

/s/ KPMG

Chartered Accountants

Calgary, Canada

April 30, 2007

----