alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
t)dr-osr-2r>oo-(pW5 

January 12, 2012 

VIA ELECTRONIC EMAIL 

Mr. Dennis Devany 

Chief, Essential Air Service and Domestic Analysis Division 

West Building, 8'^ Floor 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Also at: Dennis.DeVanv@dot.gov and EAS(5)dot.gov 

RE: ANSWER TO PACIFIC WINGS' PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION; DOCKET DOT-OST-2000-6773 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

I am writing on behalf of the Kalaupapa Federal Advisory Commission which serves strictly as an 

advisory body to the Kalaupapa National Historical Park. 

The Commission wholeheartedly supports the EAS contract awarded to Schuman Aviation Company Ltd. 

d/b/a Makani Kai Air Charters. Since Makani Kai began regular service to Kalaupapa in December it has 

been like a welcomed breath of fresh air and it has brought a renewed sense of life to the community to 

have accessible contact with the outside world. Makani Kai's service has contributed to the overall wellbeing of the community and has made the outside world more accessible and affordable to the 

residents of Kalaupapa. 

Makani Kai consulted with the community, listened to their concerns and this is reflected by their flight 

schedule and fares. They are meeting the community's needs for affordable, reliable and timely air 

service that fits the specific needs of this remote Kalaupapa community made up of patients and 

Federal and State of Hawai'i employees. In particular, their flight schedule accommodates the patients 

who are now able to fly out in the morning for medical appointments, allowing for time to run errands, 

shop for supplies, and return to Kalaupapa the same day. Their schedule also accommodates the 

employees who fly out on weekends to see their families who live topside, on Molokai, and also the 

tourists who fly in/out for daily tours. 

The past record of Pacific Wings shows they have not been responsive to Kalaupapa community 

concerns or needs, especially that of an aging Hansen's disease population. In particular, they removed a 

much needed wheel chair lift that made it difficult and, in some cases, prevented patients from 

traveling. Neither has Pacific Wings consulted with the community "to work with the community to 

identify and address any specific details of any alleged service issues..." as stated in their January 25, 

2011 letter to you. In addition, the high cost of their flights made it unaffordable and impractical for 

patients and employees to travel regularly. 
Letter to Dennis DeVany 

January 13,2012 

Page Two 

In the short time Makani Kai has been providing regularly scheduled flights, they have shown that they 

have the community's best interests at heart. The community is very happy with the service Makani Kai 

is offering as compared with the service Pacific Wings offered in the past. For the benefit of the 

Kalaupapa community, we ask that you continue to support the EAS contract that was awarded to 

Makani Kai. 

Best regards. 

David Kaupu 

Chairman, Kalaupapa Federal Advisory Commission 

2131 Puna St., Honolulu, HI 96817 

(Email: kskahu@yahoo.com)
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Central Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ John D. DohertyJohn D. DohertyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1938 

To redesignate the project for navigation, Saco River, Maine as an anchorage 

area. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2005 

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To redesignate the project for navigation, Saco River, Maine 

as an anchorage area. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF PROJECT. 

4 The portion of the project for navigation, Saco River, 

5 Maine, authorized under section 107 of the River and 

6 Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 486), and described as a 

7 6-foot deep, 10-acre maneuvering basin located at the 

8 head of navigation, is redesignated as an anchorage area. 

Æ
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNumerical simulation of scramjet inlet flow fieldsA computer program was developed to analyze supersonic combustion ramjet (scramjet) inlet flow fields. The program solves the three-dimensional Euler or Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations in full conservation form by either the fully explicit or explicit-implicit, predictor-corrector method of MacCormack. Turbulence is modeled by an algebraic eddy-viscosity model. The analysis allows inclusion of end effects which can significantly affect the inlet flow field. Detailed laminar and turbulent flow results are presented for a symmetric-wedge corner, and comparisons are made with the available experimental results to allow assessment of the program. Results are then presented for two inlet configurations for which experimental results exist at the NASA Langley Research Center.Document ID19880014351Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsKumar, Ajay*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1986Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2517NASA-TP-2517L-16000Accession Number88N23735Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-31-03-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880014351.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1628 

To provide the Secretary of Education with waiver authority for students 

who are eligible for Federal Pell Grants and are adversely affected 

by a natural disaster. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2005 

Mr. MARTINEZ (for himself and Mr. VITTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To provide the Secretary of Education with waiver authority 

for students who are eligible for Federal Pell Grants 

and are adversely affected by a natural disaster. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Pell Grant 

5 Hurricane and Disaster Relief Act’’. 
2 

•S 1628 IS

1 SEC. 2. WAIVERS OF FEDERAL PELL GRANT REPAYMENT 

2 BY STUDENTS AFFECTED BY DISASTERS. 

3 Section 484B(b)(2) of the Higher Education Act of 

4 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1091b(b)(2)) is amended by adding at 

5 the end the following new subparagraph: 

6 ‘‘(D) WAIVERS OF FEDERAL PELL GRANT

7 REPAYMENT BY STUDENTS AFFECTED BY DIS8 ASTERS.—The Secretary may waive the 

9 amounts that students are required to return 

10 under this section with respect to Federal Pell 

11 Grants if the withdrawals on which the returns 

12 are based are withdrawals— 

13 ‘‘(i) by students— 

14 ‘‘(I) who were residing in, em15 ployed in, or attending an institution 

16 of higher education that is located in 

17 an area that is designated by the 

18 President to warrant major disaster 

19 assistance under section 401 of the 

20 Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 

21 and Emergency Assistance Act (42 

22 U.S.C. 5170); and 

23 ‘‘(II) whose attendance was inter24 rupted because of the impact of the 

25 disaster on the student or the institu26 tion; and 
3 

•S 1628 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) that end within the academic 

2 year during which the designation occurred 

3 or during the next succeeding academic 

4 year.’’. 

Æ
Exhibit  32.2
                                                                  -------------

                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                              A Nevada corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Katharine Johnston, Principal Accounting Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




         Dated: May 11, 2006               /s/  Katharine Johnston
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Its: Principal Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.












                                     32.2-1
EXHIBIT 32(b)



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 of Citizens Holding Company (the Company), as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), I, Robert T. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (3) | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 7, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    ROBERT T. SMITH 
|                       |  |  |  | Robert T. Smith        
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### A & M CORPORATION OF FLORIDA d/b/a Shakeys Pizza Parlor and Ye Public House, Petitioner, v. STATE BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT of Florida and Director of State Beverage Department of Florida, Respondent.

No. 68-290.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

April 11, 1969.

Rehearing Denied May 26, 1969.

Law Offices of Richard T. Earle, Jr., and J. Gerald Murphy, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.

Maurice M. Paul, Orlando, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for certiorari denied.

LILES, C. J.; and HOBSON, J., concur.

McNULTY, J., concurs specially.

McNULTY, Judge

(concurring specially).

I am constrained reluctantly to concur in the conclusion reached by the majority.

This case involves the revocation of an alcoholic beverage license by the State Beverage Department on the grounds that appellant permitted a person of “bad moral character” to be in control of, and have an interest in, the licensed premises. While the record does not support a conclusion that the State Beverage Department and its director abused its discretion sufficiently, in any of the proceedings leading up to the revocation, to warrant the issuance of a writ of certiorari, nevertheless I am of the view that its zealous enforcement of the letter of the beverage law bordered on straining its spirit. Zeal in law enforcement is commendable; but in its exercise it ought not be confused with moralism, or else oppression results.
# L_2021178EN.01000601.xml

| 20.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 178/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 178/6

---

Corrigendum to Regulation No 107 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UNECE) – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of category M2 or M3 vehicles with regard to their general construction

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 52 of 23 February 2018
  )

On page 74, in the table:

for:

| ‘Classes | I and A | II, III and B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| First step from
  Ground ‘D’ | Max. height (mm) | 340 (*) | 380 (*)(1)(2) |
| Min. depth (mm) | 300 (3) |
| Other steps ‘E’ | Max. height (mm) | 250 (4) | 350 (5) |
| Min. height (mm) | 120 |
| Min. depth (mm) | 200’ |

‘Classes

I and A

II, III and B

First step from

Ground ‘D’

Max. height (mm)

340 (*)

380 (*)(1)(2)

Min. depth (mm)

300 (3)

Other steps ‘E’

Max. height (mm)

250 (4)

350 (5)

Min. height (mm)

120

Min. depth (mm)

200’

read:

| ‘Classes | I and A | II, III and B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| First step from
  Ground ‘D’ | Max. height (mm) | 340 (1) | 380 (1)(2)(3) |
| Min. depth (mm) | 300 (*) |
| Other steps ‘E’ | Max. height (mm) | 250 (4) | 350 (5) |
| Min. height (mm) | 120 |
| Min. depth (mm) | 200’ |

‘Classes

I and A

II, III and B

First step from

Ground ‘D’

Max. height (mm)

340 (1)

380 (1)(2)(3)

Min. depth (mm)

300 (*)

Other steps ‘E’

Max. height (mm)

250 (4)

350 (5)

Min. height (mm)

120

Min. depth (mm)

200’

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,429
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          15,386
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      1,001
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,977
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,989
<LOANS>                                        122,672
<ALLOWANCE>                                        925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,171
<DEPOSITS>                                     123,020
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,999
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            21
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,877
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 157,171
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,183
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  233
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   602
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,018
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,958
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,141
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,877
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      456
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,511
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,511
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       848
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.35
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,472
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    521
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   497
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       36
<RECOVERIES>                                         8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  925
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               925
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 5364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2028]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Public Availability of Department of Energy FY 2010 Service 
Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of public availability of FY 2010 Service Contract 
Inventories.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), Department 
of Energy is publishing this notice to advise the public of the 
availability of the FY 2010 Service Contract inventory. This inventory 
provides information on service contract actions over $25,000 that were 
made in FY 2010. The information is organized by function to show how 
contracted resources are distributed throughout the agency. The 
inventory has been developed in accordance with guidance issued on 
November 5, 2010 by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of 
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at 
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/procurement/memo/service-contract-inventories-guidance-11052010.pdf. Department of 
Energy has posted its inventory and a summary of the inventory at the 
following link: http://www.management.energy.gov/policy_guidance/competitive_sourcing.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the service 
contract inventory should be directed to Jeff Davis in the Strategic 
Programs Division at 202-287-1877 or jeff.davis@hq.doe.gov.

    Dated: January 25, 2011.
David Boyd,
Deputy Director, Office of Procurement and Assistance Management.
[FR Doc. 2011-2028 Filed 1-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
255 La. 558

#### John TURNER, Tutor v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY.

No. 50393.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 12, 1970.

In re: John Turner applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Lincoln. 230 So.2d 753.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment,
#### L. L. WATERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. DD-351.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 19, 1978.

Daniel T. O’Connell, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of *Adams v. State,*356 So.2d 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), and *State v. Berry,*358 So.2d 545 (Fla.1978).

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 13.2

LOGO

Porter Keadle Moore, LLP

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and
Shareholders

CCF Holding Company

We have audited the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CCF Holding Company and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for
the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CCF Holding
Company and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



LOGO


Atlanta, Georgia

March 11, 2005

Certified Public Accountants

Suite 1800  235 Peachtree Street NE  Atlanta, Georgia 30303  Phone 404-588-4200  Fax 404-588-4222  ww.pkm.com