alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 384 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1768 

To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2005 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. FEINGOLD, and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

MARCH 30, 2006 

Reported by Mr. SPECTER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 28. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 45 of title 28, United 

5 States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the fol6 lowing: 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

S 1768 RS 

1 ‘‘§ 678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings 

2 ‘‘The Supreme Court shall permit television coverage 

3 of all open sessions of the Court unless the Court decides, 

4 by a vote of the majority of justices, that allowing such 

5 coverage in a particular case would constitute a violation 

6 of the due process rights of 1 or more of the parties before 

7 the Court.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The chapter analysis 

9 for chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, is amended 

10 by inserting at the end the following: 

‘‘678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings.’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Calendar No. 384 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1768 

A BILL 

To permit the televising of Supreme Court 

proceedings. 

MARCH 30, 2006 

Reported without amendment 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23206]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. IA 97-065; ASLBP No. 97-731-01-EA]

Aharon Ben-Haim, Ph.D.; Establishment of Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 F.R. 28710 (1972), and Sections 
2.105, 2.700, 2.702, 2.714, 2.714a, 2.717, 2.721, and 2.772(j) of the 
Commission's Regulations, all as amended, an Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board is being established to preside over the following 
proceeding:

AHARON BEN-HAIM, Ph.D.

Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC-Licensed Activities (Effective 
Immediately)

IA 97-065

    This Board is being established as a result of a July 31, 1997 NRC 
Staff Order against Dr. Ben-Haim. The Order prohibits Dr. Ben-Haim from 
engaging in NRC-licensed activities, requires him to inform the NRC of 
any NRC licensed entity or entities where Dr. Ben-Haim is involved, and 
requires him to provide a copy of the Order to all such NRC-licensed 
entities. The petitioner, Dr. Aharon Ben-Haim, is requesting a hearing 
in accordance with 10 CFR Sec. 2.202.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

Charles Bechhoefer, Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555
Dr. Peter S. Lam, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555
Dr. Jerry R. Kline, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555

    All correspondence, documents and other materials in this 
proceeding shall be filed with the Judges in accordance with 10 C.F.R. 
Sec. 2.701.

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of August 1997.

B. Paul Cotter, Jr.,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 97-23206 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
### DOE STANDBY AND OFF MODE POWER MEASUREMENTS

DISHWASHER POWER MEASUREMENTS(W)

Off/InactiveDelay StartCycle Finished Unit 1 0.09 1.11 Unit 2 1.58 2 1.99 Unit 3 0.03 2.06 2.19 Unit 4 1.42 4.22 4.18 Unit 5 1.87 1.88 1.81 Unit 6 0.41 0.89 Unit 7 1.65 1.83 1.62 Unit 8 0 Unit 9 N/A 2.1 2.03 Unit 10 0 0 Unit 11 0.36 0.41 Unit 12 0.15 0.27 0.26 Unit 13 0.19 0.32 0.24 Unit 14 0 AVERAGE 0.69 1.91 1.56

DEHUMIDIFIER POWER MEASUREMENTS(W)

Off/InactiveBucket FullBucket RemovedDelay Start Unit 1 2.46 2.48 2.48 Unit 2 0.50 0.93 0.93 Unit 3 0.50 0.92 0.92 Unit 4 1.04 1.10 1.10 Unit 5 0.88 1.82 1.82 1.84 Unit 6 0.45 0.63 Unit 7 0.88 1.81 Unit 8 2.32 2.59 3.30 Unit 9 0.00 Unit 10 2.41 2.47 2.52 Unit 11 0.00 0.19 Unit 12 1.03 1.37 1.24 Unit 13 0.45 1.10 1.15 AVERAGE 1.04 1.46 1.81 1.54 1.63 Mode

ModeOVEN POWER MEASUREMENTS(W)

SabbathOff/InactiveDelay StartCycle Finished Unit 1 1.28 2.01 Unit 2 9.51 7.84 9.58 Unit 3 9.96 3.73 9.72 Unit 4 1.35 Unit 5 1.47 2.10 1.68 Unit 6 1.14 Unit 7 1.28 2.00 1.53 Unit 8 3.29 3.27 3.40 Unit 9 3.37 3.47 Unit 10 10.66 10.78 Unit 11 2.04 2.05 2.04 Unit 12 8.20 8.38 AVERAGE 7.59 3.80 5.35 1.75

COOKTOP POWER MEASUREMENTS(W)

SabbathOff/Inactive Unit 1 2.99 Unit 2 0.00 Unit 3 19.10 Unit 4 0.00 Unit 5 0.00 Unit 6 0.60 Unit 7 2.36 Unit 8 0.00 AVERAGE#DIV/0! 3.13Mode

ModeRANGE POWER MEASUREMENTS(W)

SabbathOff/InactiveDelay StartCycle Finished Unit 1 5.18 Unit 2 3.31 3.28 4.15 Unit 3 0.96 0.33 0.95 0.8 Unit 4 4.75 4.52 Unit 5 4.65 4.64 4.76 Unit 6 4.40 4.46 4.65 Unit 7 4.52 4.48 4.56 Unit 8 2.06 Unit 9 0.00 Unit 10 2.01 Unit 11 2.08 2.07 2.09 Unit 12 2.10 Unit 13 2.09 2.09 Unit 14 2.03 2.02 2.03 Unit 15 2.06 Unit 16 4.49 4.37 4.46 Unit 17 2.30 2.37 Unit 18 0.00 Unit 19 4.48 4.66 Unit 20 1.48 2.13 1.72 Unit 21 2.16 2.14 2.22 2.19 AVERAGE 3.72 2.68 2.95 2.52 Mode
Exhibit  32.2
                                                                  -------------

                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                              A Nevada corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Katharine Johnston, Principal Accounting Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




         Dated: May 11, 2007               /s/  Katharine Johnston
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Its: Principal Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.













                              Exhibit  32.2 - 1 (22)
#### LOGUE v. WELLMAN-LORD ENGINEERING, INC.

No. 38120.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004


In connection with the Quarterly Report of IEH Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 28, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Offerman, President of the Company, respectfully certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Michael Offerman
--------------------
Michael Offerman
President (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: November 6, 2007


This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed "filed" by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report,
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to IEH Corporation and will be retained by IEH Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       32
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Meridian      Interstate Bancorp as of and for the period covered by the      Report. |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  May      14, 2008 | /s/      Richard J. Gavegnano              |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                | Richard      J. Gavegnano                  |
|                                | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer  |
|                                |                                       |
|                                |                                       |
|                                |                                       |
|                                |                                       |
| Dated:  May      14, 2008 | /s/      Leonard V. Siuda                  |
|                                | Leonard      V. Siuda                      |
|                                | Chief      Financial Officer and Treasurer |
255 La. 240

#### Raymond H. McMANEMIN and E. V. Gould, et al. v. BOSSIER PARISH POLICE JURY, et al.

No. 50271.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1970.

In re: Raymond H. McManemin applying for certiorari, nr writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Bossier. 228 So.2d 36.

The application is denied. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.

SUMMERS & BARHAM, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted.
#### Ralph E. CELLON, Jr., G. M. Davis, Jack Durrance, Sidney Martin, and Edwin B. Turlington, as and composing the Board of County Commissioners of Alachua County, Florida, Appellants, v. Mary JOHNSON, Appellee.

No. M-336.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 4, 1970.

Wayne M. Carlisle, of Chandler, O’Neal, Carlisle, Avera, Gray & Lang, Gainesville, for appellants.

Seymour H. Rowland, Jr., and Landis V. Curry, Jr., Ocala, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Johnson v. Alexander, 219 So.2d 66 (Fla.App.1969).

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSymmetry considerations in the scattering of identical composite bodiesPrevious studies of the interactions between composite particles were extended to the case in which the composites are identical. The form of the total interaction potential matrix elements was obtained, and guidelines for their explicit evaluation were given. For the case of elastic scattering of identical composites, the matrix element approach was shown to be equivalent to the scattering amplitude method.Document ID19860013917Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsNorbury, J. W.*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, Va., United States)*Townsend, L. W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Deutchman, P. A.*(Idaho Univ. Moscow, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1986Subject CategoryNuclear And High-Energy PhysicsReport/Patent NumberL-16035NASA-TP-2548NAS 1.60:2548Accession Number86N23388Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 199-22-76-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860013917.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
July 19, 2011

Meeting Agenda 

Endangered Species Consultation and Biological Opinion 

Regarding the Effects of Oryzalin on Pacific Salmonids

USEPA Potomac Yards One

Room S-9100

2:00 pm

I. Opening Remarks and Introductions

II. Background 

III. NMFS Presentation

IV. Applicant Presentation 

V. Discussion, Summary, and Next Steps 

NOTES:
# Philmont Country: The Rocks and Landscape of a Famous New Mexico Ranch

### U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 505

by G. D. Robinson, A.A.Wanek, W. H. Hays and M. E. McCallum

----

The text and graphics are presented here in pdf format (print quality):

The full report is 38.7 MB.

The report is also available in sections below in pdf, for a faster download. 

If you have Adobe Acrobat Reader installed on your computer, you may view and/or   print the PDF version of this report. If   you do not have Acrobat Reader, you may download it here.

Users with visual disabilities   can visit this site for conversion tools and information to help make PDF files   accessible.

----

#### Sections available in pdf:

Section 1 -- 1.97 MB

What this book is about

Section 2 -- 2.42 MB

A bird's-eye view: the Philmont landscape

Section 3 -- 2.25 MB

A bird's-eye view: the Philmont landscape (cont'd)

Section 4 -- 3.31 MB

A closer view : the rocks, fossils, and water beneath the land

Section 5 -- 3.03 MB

A closer view : the rocks, fossils, and water beneath the land (cont'd)

Section 6 -- 2.78 MB

A closer view : the rocks, fossils, and water beneath the land (cont'd)

Section 7 -- 2.79 MB

A closer view : the rocks, fossils, and water beneath the land (cont'd)

Section 8 -- 3.21 MB

A closer view : the rocks, fossils, and water beneath the land (cont'd)

Section 9 -- 1.67 MB

A closer view : the rocks, fossils, and water beneath the land (cont'd)

Section 10 -- 3.09 MB

A cake of many layers: the rock sequence 

Section 11 -- 2.41 MB

Putting the rocks on paper: naming and mapping formations

When was this cake made?

Missing layers

Section 12 -- 2.44 MB

Subsurface geologic processes at work

Section 13 -- 2.77 MB

Subsurface geologic processes at work (cont'd)

Section 14 -- 2.60 MB

Subsurface geologic processes at work (cont'd)

Section 15 -- 3.11 MB

Shaping the landscape

Section 16 -- 3.72 MB

Shaping the landscape (cont'd)

Restless mountains, restless plains : the geologic history of Philmont

Exit wondering

Suggested reading

About this book

 

----

#### Plates available in pdf:

Plate 1 -- 9.31 MB

The Philmont Landscape

Plate 2 -- 2.18 MB

The Parade of Philmont Rocks

Plate 3 -- 23.94 MB

Geologic Map of the Philmont Ranch Region, New Mexico

Plate 4 -- 9.32 MB

Geology of Philmont

Plate 5 -- 4.23 MB

Geologic Sections of the Philmont Ranch Region, New Mexico

Plate 6 -- 21.57 MB

Geologic Structure of Philmont

 

----

 

Back

 

----
S. 1578 

One Hundred Ninth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and six 

An Act 

To reauthorize the Upper Colorado and San Juan River Basin endangered fish 

recovery implementation programs. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Upper Colorado and San Juan 

River Basin Endangered Fish Recovery Programs Reauthorization 

Act of 2005’’. 

SEC. 2. UPPER COLORADO AND SAN JUAN RIVER BASIN ENDANGERED 

FISH RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS. 

Section 3 of Public Law 106–392 (114 Stat. 1602; 116 Stat. 

3113) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘$46,000,000’’ and 

inserting ‘‘$61,000,000’’; 

(B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘2008’’ and inserting 

‘‘2010’’; and 

(C) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘2008’’ and inserting 

‘‘2010’’; 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) by striking ‘‘$100,000,000’’ and inserting 

‘‘$126,000,000’’; 

(B) in paragraph (1)— 

(i) by striking ‘‘$82,000,000’’ and inserting 

‘‘$108,000,000’’; and 

(ii) by striking ‘‘2008’’ and inserting ‘‘2010’’; and 

(C) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘2008’’ and inserting 

‘‘2010’’; and 

(3) in subsection (c)(4)— 

(A) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘and the Elkhead 

Reservoir enlargement’’ after ‘‘Wolford Mountain Reservoir’’; and 

mmaher on MIKETEMP with $$_JOB

S. 1578—2 

(B) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘$20,000,000’’ 

and inserting ‘‘$31,000,000’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate. 

mmaher on MIKETEMP with $$_JOB
255 La. 245

#### Ted KOGOS v. Louis J. RITTINER, Joseph W. Nelkin, and Irwin, Seelig & Nelkin.

No. 50302.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1970.

In re: Ted Kogos applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 228 So.2d 62.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
 
  As independent chartered accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report dated August 12, 1997 (except with respect to the matters discussed in
Note 2(a), as to which the date is February 3, 1999) related to Discreet Logic
Inc.'s Consolidated Financial Statements as of July 31, 1996 and June 30,
1997, as restated, and for the periods ended July 31, 1996 and June 30, 1997,
as restated, and to all references to our Firm, included in or made a part of
this Form 10-K/A, into Discreet Logic Inc.'s previously filed Registration
Statement on Form S-8, File No. 39-97400 and on Form S-3, File No. 333-34739.
 
                                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CIE
                                       Chartered Accountants
                                       General Partnership
Montreal, Canada
February 3, 1999
#### Don Rea BROWN, Petitioner, v. L. L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Florida Division of Correction, Respondent.

No. 69-855.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Oct. 13, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas Corpus denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23879]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR part 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

Stevens Forwarders, Inc., 527 Morley Drive, Saginaw, MI 48601, 
Officers: Morrison M. Stevens, President, John H. Stevens, Treasurer
Richard A. Banuelos d/b/a, Surface Sea Forwarding, 11240 N.E. Hwy, 104, 
Suite #A, Kingston, WA 98346, Sole Proprietor

    Dated: September 4, 1997.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23879 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
#### Patricia Ann Gilmer ALLEN, Appellant, v. W. Frank ALLEN, Jr., Appellee.

No. L-314.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Dec. 23, 1969.

R. Diane Burlingham, DeLand, for appellant.

Philip Tatich, of Gurney & Skolfield, Winter Park, for appellee.

SPECTOR, Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal by the plaintiff in a suit for separate maintenance.

The order sought to he reversed was rendered March 5, 1969, and by its tenor purported to amend and modify an earlier order of dismissal without prejudice pursuant to plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal. Said earlier order was rendered on January 15, 1969. Under the provisions of Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.530, 31 Florida Statutes Annotated, the lower court had jurisdiction to amend or modify the order of dismissal only for ten days after rendition which in this case would have been until January 27, 1969, since the terminal days of that ten-day period were a Saturday and Sunday. Appellee’s motion resulting in the order now under review was filed on January 29, 1969, after the court below lost jurisdiction to amend or modify the order of dismissal.

Since the order herein appealed was rendered after the trial court lost jurisdiction, it must be reversed on authority of Kippy Corporation v. Colburn, 177 So. 2d 193 (Fla.1965).

Reversed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON, J., concur.
No. 00-7315.

#### Hughey *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.