alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Memorandum, September 10, 2013 

1 of 2 

MEMORANDUM 

FROM: Andrea Siefers, US EPA/SPPD/RCG 

TO: PVC Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0037) 

DATE: September 10, 2013 

SUBJECT: Summary of July 17, 2013 Meeting Between US EPA and Earthjustice

1.0 Introduction 

On July 17, 2013, the EPA hosted a teleconference between EPA and representation from 

Earthjustice, Jim Pew and Emma Cheuse. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the 

reconsideration of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for 

Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers (PVC) Production, which were promulgated on April 17, 2012. 

2.0 Attendees 

Name Affiliation

Jim Pew Earthjustice 

Emma Cheuse Earthjustice 

Peter Tsirigotis EPA 

Fred Thompson EPA 

Steve Fruh EPA 

Eric Ginsburg EPA 

Mark Kataoka EPA 

Penny Lassiter EPA 

Jodi Howard EPA 

Angela Hackel EPA 

Kevin McLaughlin EPA 

Andrea Siefers EPA 

3.0 Summary of Meeting 
Memorandum, September 10, 2013 

2 of 2 

EPA gave an update on the reconsideration. Topics discussed were as follows: 

1) Wastewater 

A Section 114 survey was sent to PVC companies in November 2012 to collect data about 

wastewater treatment. A brief overview of the survey questions, status of the responses, and 

type of data received in May 2013 was given. 

2) Area Sources 

Earthjustice expressed concern with how the approach to regulating area sources was changed 

between proposal and final. Earthjustice stated that PVC area sources are like major sources 

(because they are synthetic and without controls would be major sources), are not small 

businesses, and are in areas with disproportionate impacts to minority communities, therefore 

they should be subject to major source standards. EPA noted the regions were being engaged, 

permits were being reviewed to better understand the area sources, and regulatory options 

were being considered, including whether to require GACT or MACT for area sources. 

Earthjustice gave several examples of where they think area sources were treated more 

appropriately (including 1998 Hazardous Waste Combustion rule). It was also noted that the 

community believes area sources should be subject to MACT standards. 

3) Future community outreach plans 

EPA plans for potential future outreach to the community was discussed, including conference 

calls to update them directly on the status of the rulemaking. EPA may also make another visit 

to the community in the future. 

Earthjustice conveyed that the community expressed willingness to work with and assist EPA in the 

reconsideration development, however possible.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,652
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,352
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,004
<PP&E>                                       4,462,632
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,989,422
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,566,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,479
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,566,214
<SALES>                                        622,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               628,250
<CGS>                                          177,562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,311,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,683,629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,683,629)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,683,629)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### SHAWN’S TIRES, INC., a Florida corporation, and Shawn Crowder, individually, Appellants, v. Samuel FISHMAN, Appellee.

No. 69-282.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 29, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 4, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Herman SMITH v. Mrs. Freddie B. YOST.

No. 49518.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 3, 1977.

Hurlbert & O’Barr, George F. Bloss, III, Biloxi, for appellant.

Bryan, Nelson, Allen & Schroeder, David L. Cobb, Gulfport, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Harrison County; J. Ruble Griffin, Judge.

*770Before PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., LEE, J., and JAMES D. HESTER, Commissioner.

Affirmed.

INZER, P. J., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, WALKER and BROOM, JJ., concur.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : No. 4:05-CR-348

:

:

v. : Judge Jones

:

RICHARD M. CAMPBELL :

Defendant. :

ORDER

April 3, 2006

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

On March 28, 2006, this Court received an updated financial affidavit of the

Defendant, Richard M. Campbell (“Defendant” or “Campbell) under cover of letter

by his court-appointed counsel, John H. Reed, Esq. The updated affidavit was

filed to the docket on March 31, 2006. (Rec. Doc. 64). 

On August 19, 2005, the day after his arrest, the Defendant completed a

financial affidavit. (Rec. Doc. 6). Significantly, the affidavit indicated that he had

not received any income within the twelve months preceding the date of the

affidavit’s completion, and that he only had $5,000 cash on hand or in savings or

checking accounts. Pursuant to this affidavit, Magistrate Judge Askey appointed

present counsel to appoint the Defendant. (Rec. Doc. 7).

Case 4:05-cr-00348-JEJ Document 65 Filed 04/03/06 Page 1 of 3
2

On November 21, 2005, a hearing was held before this Court on Defendant’s

Motion for Pretrial Release. At the hearing, the Defendant testified and this Court

asked him numerous questions regarding his assets. At the hearing, we requested

that the Defendant provide the Court with an updated financial affidavit so that we

could determine the Defendant’s need for court-appointed counsel. Meanwhile, the

Defendant, through his court-appointed counsel, filed various motions, including a

Motion to Suppress. A hearing was held on the Motion to Suppress on January 25,

2006. This Motion is currently pending before the Court.

The Defendant’s updated financial affidavit depicts quite a different picture

of Campbell’s assets than did his initial affidavit. In the updated affidavit, the

Defendant indicates that he has $45,400.00 cash on hand or in checking or savings

accounts. Moreover, the updated affidavit indicates that within the twelve months

preceding the affidavit’s completion, he received $1,533.00 monthly in Social

Security Disability and a minimal amount monthly in stock dividends. 

Furthermore, the updated affidavit reveals that Campbell owns shares of stock

worth approximately $35,000.00. 

In light of the fact that the Defendant has approximately $80,000.00 in liquid

assets, this Court cannot, in good conscience, allow Campbell’s court-appointed

representation to continue. Accordingly, we shall vacate Magistrate Judge Askey’s

Case 4:05-cr-00348-JEJ Document 65 Filed 04/03/06 Page 2 of 3
1

 We note for the sake of clarity that, at this juncture, the Defendant has two options. He

may proceed pro se or retain private counsel. We strongly urge the Defendant to choose the

latter.

3

August 19, 2005 order (doc. 7) appointing counsel for the Defendant.1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The August 19, 2005 order (doc. 7) appointing counsel for Defendant

is VACATED.

s/ John E. Jones III

John E. Jones III

United States District Judge

Case 4:05-cr-00348-JEJ Document 65 Filed 04/03/06 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 10.6


 


NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


 


MATERIAL TERMS OF ANNUAL
BONUS PLAN


 


The material terms of the Northern Technologies International Corporation annual bonus
plan for executive officers and certain other employees are set forth in resolutions approved by the Compensation Committee and
are not otherwise set forth in any written formal plan or individual agreements between NTIC and plan participants.


 


For each fiscal year, the total amount available under the bonus plan for all plan participants,
including executive officers, is dependent upon the Company’s earnings before interest, taxes and other income, as adjusted
to take into account amounts to be paid under the bonus plan and certain other adjustments (Adjusted EBITOI). Each plan participant’s
percentage of the overall bonus pool is based upon the number of plan participants, the individual’s annual base salary and
the individual’s position and level of responsibility within the company. In the case of each of the Company’s executive
officer participants, 75% of the amount of their individual bonus payout is determined based upon the Company’s actual EBITOI
for the fiscal year compared to a pre-established target EBITOI for the fiscal year and 25% of the payout is determined based upon
such executive officer’s achievement of certain pre-established individual performance objectives. The payment of bonuses
under the plan is discretionary and bonuses may be paid to executive officer participants in both cash and shares of NTIC common
stock, the exact amount and percentages of which are determined by the Company’s Board of Directors, upon recommendation
of the Compensation Committee, after the completion of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year.
Order filed, June 20, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00350-CR

____________

DAWN PATRICE MOORE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1294531

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due June 09, 2014. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Edna Thornton, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the criteria established in InternalControl—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the TreadwayCommission (COSO).The Company acquired AWB Limited during 2010, and management excluded from its assessment of theeffectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,AWB Limited’s internal controls over financial reporting associated with net assets representing27% of the consolidated net assets of the Company and total revenues of 4% of the totalconsolidated revenues included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of andfor the year ended December 31, 2010. Our audit of internal controls over financial reporting ofthe Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal controls over financial reporting of AWBLimited.We have also conducted our audits on the consolidated financial statements of the Company as ofDecember 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2010 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the standards of thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our report dated March 7, 2011 expressedan unmodified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.*/s/* *KPMG LLP* Chartered AccountantsCalgary, Canada
Exhibit 99.4



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.



--------------------------------------------------------------------





In connection with the Annual  Report of Andean Development Corporation(the "Company") on Form  10-KSB for the  year  ended  December 31, 2003,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Lance Larsen, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  April 15, 2005



/s/ Lance Larsen _____________

Lance Larsen, Chief Accounting Officer
**USDA Statistical Bulletin- SB960 Milk Disposition and Income - Final Estimates 1993-97  [ Text |   PDF ]  SB959 Meat Animals, PDI - Final Estimates 1993-97 [ Text | PDF ]SB958 Poultry Production and Value - Final Estimates 1994-97 
[ Text |
 PDF ]
- SB957 Agricultural Land Values - Final Estimates 1994-98  [ Text |   PDF ]  SB956 Honey - Final Estimates by State and United States, 1993-97 [ Text | PDF 114kB ]SB955 Farms and Land in Farms - Final Estimates 1993-97  
[ Text |
 PDF 500kB ]
- SB954 Sheep and Goats - Final Estimates 1994-98   [ Text |   PDF 93kB ]  SB953 Cattle - Final Estimates 1994-98  [ Text | PDF 208kB ]SB952 Milk Cows and Production - Final Estimates 1993-97    
[ Text |
 PDF 165kB ]
- SB951 Hogs and Pigs - Final Estimates 1993-97   [ Text |   PDF 159kB ]  SB950 Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts - Final Estimates 1992-97  [ Text | PDF 340kB ]SB949 Rice Stocks - Final Estimates 1993-98  
[ Text |
 PDF 65kB ]
- SB948 Stocks of Grains, Oilseeds, & Hay - Final Estimates 1993-98   [ Text |   PDF 279kB ]  SB947 Field Crops - Final Estimates 1992-97  [ Text | PDF 363kB ]SB946 Vegetables - Final Estimates 1992-97  
[ Text |
 PDF 344kB ]
- SB945 Turkeys - Final Estimates 1994-97   [ Text |   PDF 108kB ]  SB944 Chickens and Eggs - Final Estimates 1994-97  [ Text | PDF 389kB ]

**
# Preparing for executive leadership

/ Published Sept. 6, 2018

The journey to become a member of the Senior Executive Service is long but achievable. The Defense Logistics Agency helps its employees along that journey through its Executive Development Program.

“The program’s purpose is to develop DLA’s current and future leaders and prepare them to effectively navigate and manage leadership challenges, and to develop the leadership competencies critical to maintaining supply chain excellence,” said DLA Executive Development Program Manager Patricia Proctor.

DLA Energy’s Andre Hinson completed the Life Cycle Executive Leadership Program in August. A strategic fuel planner for DLA Energy Europe & Africa, Hinson found the training rewarding.

“As a strategic planner, I recognize the struggle between warfighter support capability and resources,” Hinson said. “This course expanded my understanding of life cycle management, plans and the challenges brought into the resource equation.” 

The Life Cycle Executive Leadership Program is one of 20 courses offered during the 2018 DLA Executive Development Program. The career broadening courses offer leadership development opportunities for GS-13 through GS-15 employees and range in length from four days to 10 months.

“I strongly believe the benefits of immersing professionally away from the office far outweighs the challenges of being away from work for a few days,” Hinson said. “Participation in the LCELP allowed me to further hone my leadership abilities and enabled me to bring back knowledge from private industry in order to advance DLA’s efforts during challenging transformational times for our nation.”

The five-day LCELP course brings together leaders from the private and military sector to gain a deeper understanding of life cycle theories, practices, and techniques. The course is taught by the Institute for Defense and Business in partnership with the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at North Carolina State University and North Carolina Agriculture and Technical State University.

DLA Energy employees who attend the course are expected to proactively leverage the knowledge and skills learned back in the workplace according to DLA Human Resources Director Brad Bunn.

Hinson, a retired Army officer, is an advocate of leadership development seminars and conferences.

“The professional development courses aid in re-assessing where I am today, what I want, and how I am going to get there,” he said.

DLA Energy had 17 employees selected for the fiscal year 2018 DLA Executive Development Program. The competition for these coveted opportunities is fierce. Selection decisions are made by the DLA Executive Resources Board.

A call for the 2019 Executive Development Program nomination packages is expected to be issued in October. To learn more about course descriptions and nomination documents, please visit the DLA Human Resources web page (this link is Common Access Card-enabled). Nominees are encouraged to review course requirements carefully and begin early as incomplete packages will be screened out.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAerospace Ceramic Materials: Thermal, Environmental Barrier Coatings and SiC/SiC Ceramic Matrix Composites for Turbine Engine ApplicationsCeramic materials play increasingly important roles in aerospace applications because ceramics have unique properties, including high temperature capability, high stiffness and strengths, excellent oxidation and corrosion resistance. Ceramic materials also generally have lower densities as compared to metallic materials, making them excellent candidates for light-weight hot-section components of aircraft turbine engines, rocket exhaust nozzles, and thermal protection systems for space vehicles when they are being used for high-temperature and ultra-high temperature ceramics applications. Ceramic matrix composites (CMCs), including non-oxide and oxide CMCs, are also recently being incorporated in gas turbine engines for high pressure and high temperature section components and exhaust nozzles. However, the complexity and variability of aerospace ceramic processing methods, compositions and microstructures, the relatively low fracture toughness of the ceramic materials, still remain the challenging factors for ceramic component design, validation, life prediction, and thus broader applications. This ceramic material section paper presents an overview of aerospace ceramic materials and their characteristics. A particular emphasis has been placed on high technology level (TRL) enabling ceramic systems, that is, turbine engine thermal and environmental barrier coating systems and non-oxide type SiC/SiC CMCs. The current status and future trend of thermal and environmental barrier coatings and SiC/SiC CMC development and applications are described.Document ID20180002984Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsZhu, Dongming*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 21, 2018Publication DateMay 1, 2018Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsEngineering (General)Report/Patent NumberE-19506NASA/TM-2018-219884GRC-E-DAA-TN52842Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.03.02.01.05Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsThermal Barrier CoatingsEnvironmental Barrier CoatingsAvailable DownloadsNameType20180002984.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# Tapping into a prime hiring resource - Operation Warfighter intern hired at San Diego distribution center

/ Published Dec. 21, 2018
SAN DIEGO, Calif., 
Navy Petty Officer Heather Fournier served at DLA Distribution San Diego, California, while enrolled in the Department of Defense Operation Warfighter Internship Program from September 4, 2017 to March 3, 2018.  

While working as an intern in the OWF program, Fournier performed a variety of administrative and financial functions in support of the distribution center’s command division.  

The OWF program provides transitioning sailors an opportunity to shape their futures by learning skills and experience directly transferable to job opportunities across multiple federal agencies.  

The San Diego distribution center has hosted four OWF interns since August 2017 and has another OWF intern in the pipeline.  After completing their internships, most interns returned to their home of record.  However, hiring an OWF Intern into a full time position is a win for both the sailors and agencies involved. Due to her veteran status, as well as participation in the OWF program, Fournier was able to qualify and be selected as San Diego’s resource and financial manager.

“I am able to use all of the training and skills obtained during my OWF internship experience in my new position as a management analyst.  This made the transition into Federal employment very fluid and less stressful,” said Fournier.

Melissa Meador, DLA Distribution OWF internship coordinator, explained, “Our distribution center in San Diego has been able to tap into this local resource of prime candidates to expand the diversity of their workforce and bring in dedicated and eager veterans. The command and regional OWF coordinators have a strong working relationship which will continue to serve both our Warfighters and our agency in a positive light.   We look forward to offering more opportunities, for other veterans in the future.”
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Leonard Edward JOHNSON.

No. 60308.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 27, 1977.

Patrick D. McArdle, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Oscar KLEIN, Appellant, v. PEOPLES GAS SYSTEM, INC., Leo C. Herman and Transamerica Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 2606.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Aug. 13, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.