alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Alcide J. WEYSHAM.

No. 60401.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1978.

Milton P. Masinter, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Brian G. Meissner, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Alcide J. Weysham, a former member of the Louisiana State Bar Association,1 was charged in the same bill of information with two separate counts of unlawful practice of law in violation of La.R.S. 37:213. After a judge trial, defendant was found guilty as charged on both counts. On each *252count, defendant was sentenced to pay a fine of $500 (or, in default thereof, to serve three months in the parish prison) and to serve one year in the parish prison. Execution of the prison sentences was suspended, and defendant was placed on inactive probation for the same period of time. As a special condition of probation, defendant was ordered to make restitution to the victims of his criminal conduct within ninety days. The sentences on the two counts were ordered to run consecutively. On appeal, defendant relies upon nine assignments of error for reversal of his convictions and sentences.2

We have reviewed the record and find no merit to defendant’s assignments of error. Accordingly, we affirm his convictions and sentences.

DECREE

The convictions and sentences are affirmed.

1

. Defendant was disbarred by this court on January 20, 1975. Louisiana *State Bar Assoc. v. Weysham,*307 So.2d 336 (La.1975).

2

. In brief, defendant expressly abandons Assignments of Error Nos. 1, 6 and 7.
**Agriculture and Trade: Europe (94001)**
EPA420-F-97-037

Aa : :
U.S. Environmental Protection Agenc
IN Bency

National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory

Annual Emissions and Fuel Consumption for an "Average" Passenger Car'

Pollutant Problem Amount? Miles Calculation Pollution/Fuel Consumption
per mile (mi)

Hydrocarbons Urban ozone (smog) 2.9 grams (g) 12,500 2.9 g/mi X 12,500 mi X 1 Ib/454 g = 80 pounds of hydrocarbons
Air toxics
Carbon Monoxide Poisonous gas 22 grams 12,500 22 g/mi X 12,500 mi X | Ib/454 g = 606 pounds of carbon monoxide
Nitrogen Oxides Urban ozone (smog) 1.5 grams 12,500 1.5 g/mi X 12,500 mi X 1 Ib/454 g = 41 pounds of nitrogen oxides
Acid rain

Carbon Dioxide Global warming 0.8 pound (Ib) 12,500 0.8 Ib/mi X 12,500 mi = 10,000 pounds of carbon dioxide

Gasoline Imported oil 0.044 gallon 12,500 0.044gallon/mi X 12,500 mi = 550 gallons of gasoline

Notes:

1. These are averages. Individual vehicles may travel more or less miles and may emit more or less pollution per mile than indicated here. Emission
factors and pollution/fuel consumption totals may differ slightly from original sources due to rounding.

2. The emission factors used here come from standard EPA emission models. They assume an “average,” properly maintained car on the road in 1997,
operating on typical gasoline on a summer day (72-96°F). Emissions may be higher in very hot or very cold weather.

3. Average annual mileage source: EPA Office of Mobile Sources Assessment and Modeling Division.

4. Fuel consumption is based on average in-use passenger car fuel economy of 22.5 miles per gallon. Source: US DOT/FHA, Highway Statistics 1995.
No. 00-7278.

#### Aytch *v.*Kupec et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
255 La. 247

#### Kathleen J. McWARD v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and Paul R. Duplechain.

No. 50305.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1970.

In re: Kathleen J. McWard applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 228 So.2d 195.

The application is denied. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT 22 November 2002

CASE NUMBER: P03-0106

RELATED CASES:

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX

LEVEL: 1-2 2

KEYWORDS: AQUATOX-A,C, LUNG

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT:

FATE: with <1% <1000 and 0% <500 with 0.56% solid (P) with mp = unk E C (P) S <0.001 mg/L at 20 E C but use requires that it be dispersible (PMN) in water; vp < 1.0E-6 mm Hg or torr at 25 E C (P) bp > 500 E C (P) H < 1.0E-8 (P) log Koc > 4.5 (P) log fish BCF = 0.50 (P) POTW removal = 90% via sorption time for complete ultimate aer obic biodegradation > months sorption to soils and sediments = very strong

PBT Potential: P3B1T1 *CEB FATE: migration to ground water = negligible

HEALTH: Absorption nil thru skin based on ph ysical/chemical properties; the LMW will be poor thru lungs and poor thru GI tract based on analogs;

concern for lung toxicity if inhaled via irritati on to mucous membranes and cationic binding with membranes;

low to moderate concern for toxicity;

*CEB HEALTH: Exposures to humans: inhalation

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L (ppm) are:

fish 96-h LC50 > 8.9 P TOC 2 fish (ZF) 96-h LC50 > 26.0 M S,N H250 TOC? ChemID? fish (ZF) 96-h NOEC EC0 = 26.0 M S,N H250 TOC? ChemID? daphnid 48-h LC50 > 150.0 P TOC 2 daphnid 48-h LC50 > 26.0 M S,N H250 TOC? ChemID?daphnid 48-h NOEC EC0 = 26.0 M S,N H250 TOC? ChemID? green algal 96-h EC50 > 11.0 P TOC 2 algal 24-h EC35 c = 26.0 M S,N H24 TOC? ChemID? algal 48-h EC13 c = 26.0 M S,N H24 TOC? ChemID? algal 72-h EC0 c = 26.0 M S,N H24 TOC? ChemID? algal 72-h EC50 c > 26.0 M S,N H24 TOC? ChemID? algal 72-h EC50 a > 26.0 M S,N H24 TOC? ChemID? algal 72-h EC50 r > 26.0 M S,N H24 TOC? ChemID?

fish chronic value > 0.500 P TOC 2 daphnid ChV > 11.0 P TOC 2 algal ChV > 3.1 P TOC 2 algal ChV c > 26.0 M S,N H24 TOC? ChemID? algal 72-h NOEC EC0 c = 26.0 M S,N H24 TOC? ChemID? algal ChV a > 26.0 M S,N H24 TOC? ChemID? algal 72-h NOEC EC0 a = 26.0 M S,N H24 TOC? ChemID? algal ChV r > 26.0 M S,N H24 TOC? ChemID? algal 72-h NOEC EC0 r = 26.0 M S,N H24 TOC? ChemID?

Predictions are based on SARs fo r polycationic polymers with typi cal charge density = 0.56% ; SAR chemical class = polymer-cationic-0.56% amin e-N (typical); with <1% <1000 and 0% <500; pH7; effective con centrations based on 100% act ive ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

moderate concern for acute toxici ty in water with TOC<2.0 mg/L; mitigation of toxicity expected in the presence of 10 mg TOC/L, i.e., less than or equal to 7 times;

moderate concern for environm ental risk at TOC = 10 mg/L;

assessment factor = 10.0 concern concentration = 0.050 mg/L (ppm) w ith no mitigation assumed due to 10 mg TOC/L; *CEB ECOTOX: All releases to water;

SAT Co-chair: Vince Nabholz, 564.8909
**-  Beltsville  \ BARC 
-  Animal & Natural Resources 
-  Animal Parasitic Diseases 
Printable VersionE-mail this pageThis site onlyAll ARS Advanced Search UBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">	You are here: 						Research / 								**Research Project:**National Animal Health Monitoring Survey 2006, Toxoplasma Gondii and Trichinella Spiralis
**Location: Animal Parasitic Diseases**
												Project Number: 1265-32000-076-25Project Type:																				Reimbursable

Start Date: Aug 05, 2006End Date: Aug 04, 2009

**Objective:**The purpose of this study will be to determine the national prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella spiralis in pigs using sera banked from the 2006 national swine study conducted by the USDA/NAHMS.  These data will continue the comparative measure of the prevalence of these two zoonotic parasites, which have been surveilled under the NAHMS program since 1990.  These data are critical to the implementation of effective control programs for toxoplasmosis and trichinellosis in domestic swine and for fact-based education of consumers, USDA regulatory agencies, and international trading partners concerning the safety of pork products.
**Approach:**A statistically meaningful set of blood samples will be collected during the NAHMS 2006 National Swine Survey from randomly selected swine operations in the top hog producing states of the U.S.  Samples will be assayed by ELISA for detection of antibodies to T. gondii and T. spiralis using commercially available test kits.  Putative positive samples will be retested to confirm results.  Results will be tabulated to determine a national prevalence of T. gondii and T. spiralis in the U.S. swine herd.
    Project TeamHill, Dolores  
Project Annual Reports FY 2008 FY 2007 
Related National Programs Food Safety, (animal and plant products)(108)  							Last Modified: 06/14/2009 		ARS Home |USDA.gov |Site Map |Policies and Links FOIA |Accessibility Statement |Privacy Policy |Nondiscrimination Statement |Information Quality |USA.gov |White House

**
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Aconceptual model of the hydrogeologic framework, geochemistry, andgroundwater-flow system of the Edwards-Trinity and related aquifers in thePecos County Region, Texas**
 
Report | Figure 28 11 x17
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.42/4-4:2012-5124
Item Number:0624-B-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000878796
 
July 16, 2018
No. 00-7254.

#### Portwood *v.*Arizona Department of Corrections et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Opinion issued June 18, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-24-00201-CV

———————————

COTTON LOGISTICS, INC., Appellant

V.

SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-83104

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss its appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). 
2

Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss its appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We also dismiss all other pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Kelly and Goodman.
Helping People Help the Land

Conservation Activity Plan

Supporting Organic Transition

December 2011

Supporting Organic 

Transition

An organic transition conservation 

	

	


strategy to help a landowner 

switch from conventional farming 

or ranching systems to organic 

production systems that meet 

USDA National Organic Program 

Standards. 

NRCS Technical Service Providers 

(TSPs) prepare these plans using 

inputs such as:

  






  



  



 planting options

  


	

  	





 crops

Conservation practices 

recommended in such a plan can 

include:

  
	

  



  




  !"




  #
$
%

  &





  '


*
	




www.nrcs.usda.gov and search for 

“Technical Service Providers.”

www.nrcs.usda.gov

USDA is an equal opportunity 

provider and employer.
#### PITTMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. HOUSTON FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 3527.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Fourth Circuit.

June *2,*1969.

Rehearing Denied July 7, 1969.

Reuter, Reuter & Schott, Arthur C. Reuter, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Bienvenu & Culver, H. F. Foster, III, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.

Before REGAN, YARRUT and HALL, JJ-

HALL, Judge.

These two suits were consolidated for trial below and the appeals therefrom were consolidated for hearing in this Court.

Our docket No. 3527 involves an appeal by the plaintiff, Pittman Construction Company, from a judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, dismissing plaintiff’s suit under the provisions of LSA-C.C.P. Art. 561 for failure of the parties to take any steps in its prosecution or defense for a period of five years.

In its brief herein appellant, Pittman Construction Company, states the facts as follows:

> “ * * * An examination of the record will reveal that this suit was filed on May 27, 1955, and answer and third party petition was filed on November 15, 1955 and a motion to consolidate was filed on January 6, 1956, but no further action was taken towards prosecution of this case until March 13, 1963.”

The facts as set forth in appellant’s brief show clearly that more than five years has elapsed since the last action was taken herein and *appellant,*citing Tucker v. Tucker, La.App., 150 So.2d 665, prays that the judgment appealed from be affirmed.

Appellee, Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, agrees with the facts set forth in appellant’s brief and prays that the judgment appealed from be affirmed; but Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company particularly calls our attention to the fact that it is not a party to the case (our No. 3544) consolidated herewith and that anything done by the parties in that action has no effect on this action, citing Darouse v. Mamon, La.App., 201 So.2d 362; Stephney v. Robertson, La.App., 219 So.2d 9 and Voth v. American Home Assurance Company, La.App., 219 So.2d 236, to the general effect that consolidation of, cases for trial is a procedural convenience and does not merge the actions unless the records clearly reflect an intention to do so.

Since both appellant and appellee pray that the judgment appealed from be affirmed the judgment is hereby affirmed; costs of both Courts to be borne by appellant, Pittman Construction Company.

Affirmed.
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Joseph C. VALANTIEJUS, Respondent.

No. 52191.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 9, 1978.

*426Wallace B. McCall, Bar Counsel, West Palm Beach, and Elinor P. Smith, Asst. Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

PER CURIAM.

This is a disciplinary action brought by The Florida Bar against one of its members, Joseph C. Valantiejus. Our jurisdiction is authorized by Article V, Section 15, Florida Constitution.

The Florida Bar filed its Complaint in March, 1975, charging Valantiejus with (1) failure to properly perform his duties as a guardian, (2) failure to promptly handle clients’ business, and (3) failure to fully advise a judicial officer, when questioned, regarding his delay in bringing these legal matters to a close.

The Florida Bar, through its Referee, had great difficulty advising Respondent of the charges against him. On several occasions, judicial officers either telephoned or wrote Valantiejus concerning the matters here under consideration. In spite of mailings to both his business and home addresses, the respondent failed to answer. This court ordered its Clerk to have a copy of the charges and Referee’s Report served upon the respondent by mail. On November 21, 1977, the respondent received a copy of the charges, Referee’s Report (with recommendations), and a letter from this court advising him that he could reply within 15 days. No response has been filed.

Without a detailed account of the evidence, it is sufficient to state that the record proves by clear and convincing evidence that Valantiejus failed to perform his duties as a guardian, that he consistently ignored the ward’s needs, and ignored the pleas of other parties to take immediate action. The pleas by non-parties included a direct conversation in which a circuit judge urged Valantiejus to take speedy action. In nine other cases the pattern was the same. Although urged to do so by the parties and other interested persons, he failed to properly perform. We find the evidence sufficient (clear and convincing) to show a violation of the Code of Professional Conduct as charged in Counts I and II of the Bar’s complaint. *The Florida Bar v. Rayman,*238 So.2d 594 (Fla.1970), and *The Florida Bar*v. *Wagner,*212 So.2d 770 (Fla. 1968).

The Referee found that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the Bar’s charges in Count III of the complaint, that respondent made an intentionally false or incomplete statement to a judicial officer. We also find the evidence insufficient on this point.

The respondent is guilty as charged by the Bar’s Complaint in Counts I and II thereof in that he did violate Disciplinary Rules 1 — 102(A)(5), 1-102(A)(6), and 6-101(A)(3).

Accordingly, Joseph C. Valantiejus is suspended from the practice of law in the State of Florida for a period of twelve months, beginning February 9, and thereafter until he shall prove his rehabilitation and pay the costs of these proceedings in the sum of $358.60.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C. J., and BOYD, ENGLAND, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHydrodynamic aspects of shark scalesRidge morphometrices on placoid scales from 12 galeoid shark species were examined in order to evaluate their potential value for frictional drag reduction. The geometry of the shark scales is similar to longitudinal grooved surfaces (riblets) that have been previously shown to give 8 percent skin-friction reduction for turbulent boundary layers. The present study of the shark scales was undertaken to determine if the physical dimensions of the ridges on the shark scales are of the right magnitude to be used by the sharks for drag reduction based on previous riblet work. The results indicate that the ridge heights and spacings are normally maintained between the predicted optimal values proposed for voluntary and burst swimming speeds throughout the individual's ontogeny. Moreover, the species which might be considered to be the faster posses smaller and more closely spaced ridges that based on the riblet work would suggest a greater frictional drag reduction value at the high swimming speeds, as compared to their more sluggish counterparts.Document ID19860013418Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsRaschi, W. G.*(Bucknell Univ. Lewisburg, PA, United States)*Musick, J. A.*(Coll. of William and Mary Gloucester Point, Va., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1986Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:3963NASA-CR-3963Accession Number86N22889Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-31-13CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-16042Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860013418.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 31.1

              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Gunther Than, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of View Systems,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.



                                        /s/ Gunther Than
Date: November 10, 2005                ____________________________________
                                       Gunther Than, Chief Executive Officer
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1829 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2006 

Referred to the Committee on Resources 

AN ACT 

To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 1936, 

pertaining to the Virgin Islands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

S.1829 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN LAWS PERTAINING TO 

2 THE VIRGIN ISLANDS. 

3 (a) REPEAL.—Sections 1 through 6 of the Act of May 

4 26, 1936 (48 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.), are repealed. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 this section takes effect on July 22, 1954. 

Passed the Senate September 29, 2006. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
**ZIPFIP (program and database) (93014)**