alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

 

 

I, Gunther Than, President and Treasurer of View Systems, Inc. (the “Corporation”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:

 

1.

  the amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. 

 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

 

|                            |                        |                                                                                                                                      |        |
|----------------------------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       |                   |                                                                                                                                 |   |
|                       | **View Systems, Inc.** |                                                                                                                                 |
|                       |                   |                                                                                                                                 |   |
| Date: August 19, 2009 | By:                    | /s/ Gunther Than                                                                                                                |   |
|                       |                   | Gunther Than                                                                                                                         |   |
|                       |                   | President and Treasurer

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer) |
|                       |                   |                                                                                                                                 |   |
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Autec Associates, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Luther Jefferies, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   in information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


                             Date: December 8, 2003


                             /s/ "Luther Jefferies"

                                Luther Jefferies

                             Chief Financial Officer
# DLA working group names areas for potential use of artificial intel to boost efficiency

/ Published Aug. 10, 2018

A team from the Defense Logistics Agency’s Analytics Center of Excellence at a recent workshop identified more than two dozen DLA processes to which artificial intelligence and machine learning could someday bring greater efficiency and lower risk — in line with goals set in the DLA Strategic Plan.

ACE’s Artificial Intelligence Working Group developed the potential areas at a workshop in Fort Lee, Virginia, July 24-26. The group also identified five areas where leaders can focus their initial AI/ML efforts.

The 45-member team, led by Teresa Smith, DLA’s chief data officer, and Jeff Charlesworth, the agency’s chief technology officer, first assessed the agency’s capability gaps. They also considered what training users would need to monitor and adjust the performance of AI/ML systems. 

Ultimately, the group found 26 processes that span the functions of DLA. They include:
      - Financial adjustments
      - Inventory reconciliations
      - Analysis of data on price, performance, delivery and quality

The members also worked with the Information Operations training coordinator to evaluate training options, including academic institutions, industry programs and online options.  

Marcus Bowers, DLA’s director of transformation, briefed the working group on the DLA Strategic Plan and relative AI/ML considerations.

The team then assessed how these emerging tools could be applied to improve DLA’s processes in innovative and productive ways. 

“The working group and resulting gap analysis will greatly inform related DoD Reform initiatives and business transformation,” Bowers said, adding that the group’s work has “set the bar for DLA’s focused effort regarding OSD policy on emerging technologies.”  

Tom Meyer, director of ACE, noted that AI and ML are not for every problem or process. “AI and ML are powerful tools if applied properly and to the right kinds of problems,” he said. “The group worked hard to identify potential use cases that best fit AI’s and ML’s design as learning tools centered on complex data.”  

The ACE team will work with agency leaders and subject matter experts to develop specific AI/ML solutions to enhance DLA support to the warfighter. The team is also part of a Department of Defense working group developing the AI strategy for all of DoD. 

The DLA Strategic Plan calls for the agency “to provide predictive technologies that anticipate and position solutions for Warfighter****requirements by combining big data, predictive analytics,****automation, artificial intelligence, sustained supply chain****visibility and continuous communication.”
DLA Energy Korea changes command
 
  By Stephanie Buggs, DLA Energy Student Trainee
  Defense Logistics Agency Energy Korea’s leadership changed hands when Army Lt. Col. Faith M. Chamberlain relinquished command during a ceremony at the Evergreen Club on Camp Walker, South Korea, June 22. Chamberlain served as the DLA Energy Korea commander since June 2016. “My last two years commanding Energy Korea was so personally and professionally rewarding,” Chamberlain said. “I had a phenomenal team who took this organization to the next level. I know going forward Lt. Col. Daniel and this team will continue the legacy of flawless support to the warfighter.” DLA Pacific Commander Navy Capt. Timothy L. Daniels presided over the ceremony. In his remarks, he praised Chamberlain for her leadership and professionalism. “Nowhere else in the world is a DLA Energy office so closely associated with the supported warfighter,” he said. “DLA Energy Korea is a key member of the Combined Petroleum Support Center supporting Sub Area Petroleum Office Korea in its dual roles of ensuring fuel supply to both U.S. and Republic of Korea forces under the Combined Forces Command during wartime.” The incoming commander, Army Lt. Col. Craig A. Daniel, recently served as the support operations officer for the 3rd Infantry Division Sustainment Brigadewith duty at both Fort Stewart, Georgia, and Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan, in support of operation Resolute Support. During the ceremony, Daniel shared his excitement on being selected for command. “I look forward to being a part of DLA and the first class Energy Korea team,” he said. “Hearing about the team’s achievements and professionalism makes me very grateful to have this opportunity.” Daniel is a native of Houston, Texas, and was commissioned as an Army second lieutenant in the Quartermaster Corps through the ROTC program at Radford University. The DLA Energy Korea mission is to provide world-class petroleum supply, transport and management for U.S. forces in the Republic of Korea. The command consists of U.S. Soldiers and Airmen, Department of Defense civilians, and Korean employees. Headquartered at Camp Walker, Daegu, DLA Energy Korea has a residency office and a petroleum laboratory at Camp Humphreys.
#### METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, W. Wirt Culbertson, Metropolitan Dade County Tax Assessor, Robert K. Overstreet, Metropolitan Dade County Tax Collector, and Fred O. Dickinson, Comptroller of the State of Florida, Appellants, v. TROPICAL PARK, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-303.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 5, 1970.

Thomas C. Britton, County Atty., and Gary S. Brooks, Asst. County Atty., for appellants.

Worley & Gautier, and Robert G. Wor-ley, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the authority of Keith Investments, Inc. v. James, Fla.App.1969, 220 So.2d 695; Hecht v. Dade County, Third District Court of Appeal, 234 So.2d 709, filed April 28, 1970. See also cases cited at 10 Fla.Jur. Discovery, § 9.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Adolor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael R. Dougherty, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 29, 2010



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael R. Dougherty             
|Michael R. Dougherty                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 10.2EXECUTION COPYGUARANTY AND SURETYSHIP AGREEMENT          THIS GUARANTY AND SURETYSHIP AGREEMENT (this “Guaranty”), dated as of the26th day of July 2006, made by LIFE TIME FITNESS, INC., a Minnesota corporation(“Guarantor”), to WELL-PROP (MULTI) LLC, a Delaware limited liability company(“Landlord”).WITNESSETH:     WHEREAS, Landlord, as lessor, has entered into a Lease Agreement of even date herewith (the“Lease”), in which Landlord leased to LTF Real Estate Company, Inc., a Minnesotacorporation (“Tenant”), certain premises situate in Bloomington, MN, Eden Prairie, MN (2locations), Fridley, MN, St. Louis Park, MN and Boca Raton, FL (the “Leased Premises”);          WHEREAS, all of the issued and outstanding stock of Tenant is owned by Guarantor; and          WHEREAS, the execution and delivery by Guarantor of this Guaranty is a material inducement toLandlord to execute the Lease, and Guarantor expects to derive financial benefit from the Lease.          NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration,the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by Guarantor, and intending to be legally bound,Guarantor hereby covenants and agrees as follows:ARTICLE I
#### Karl Jon PORTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-103.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 23, 1977.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 11, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Craig S. Barnard, Asst. Public Defender, and Geoffrey D. Cohen, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Basil S. Diamond, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a denial of post-conviction relief requested under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850. The Appellant alleges that he was convicted in violation of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel at trial. No useful purpose would be served to set out all the facts; it is sufficient to say Appellant was represented by an attorney appointed by the court who also represented his co-defendant. He was retained counsel for the co-defendant. Appellant’s defense to the murder charge was antagonistic to that of his co-defendant and a review of the record discloses that substantial prejudice resulted from the obvious conflict of interest. Therefore the Judgment and Sentence are reversed and this matter is remanded for a new trial. *Wilson v. State,*348 So.2d 10 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). *Glasser v. United States,*315 U.S. 60, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942). *Baker v. State,*202 So.2d 563 (Fla.1967).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

CROSS and LETTS, JJ., concur.
### Metamorphic facies map of southeastern Alaska: Distribution, facies, and ages of regionally metamorphosed rocks

By: Cynthia Dusel-Bacon**D. A. BrewS. L. Douglass

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1497D

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2187
STEVEN KRICHBAUM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; ROBERT JOSLIN, Regional Forester; WILLIAM DAMON, Forester Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-1000-R) Submitted: March 31, 1998 Decided: April 9, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Krichbaum, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Robert Haag, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Defendants in Appellant's action challenging the United States Forest Service's decision to allow the harvesting of timber on 187 acres in the George Washington National Forest. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Krichbaum v. United States Forest Service , No. CA96-1000-R (W.D. Va. July 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the audited
financial  statements  of The AdsOnly  Group,  Inc. for December 31, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000943142
<NAME>                        The AdsOnly Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         304,328
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               304,328
<PP&E>                                         1,983
<DEPRECIATION>                                 826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 348,620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          51,360
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       583,959
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   348,620
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  53,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (53,840)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (53,840)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (53,840)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.17
                                  -------------


                     AGREEMENT TO AMEND CONSULTING AGREEMENT

         This agreement is entered into this ___ day of December,  2006, between
___________________________  (the  "Director") and PennFed  Financial  Services,
Inc. ("PennFed").

         WHEREAS,  a  consulting  agreement  was entered  into on March 1, 2003,
between the Director and PennFed (the "Consulting Agreement").

         WHEREAS,  in  connection  with  the  merger  of  PennFed  into New York
Community  Bancorp,  Inc.  ("NYCB"),  it is  necessary  to amend the  Consulting
Agreement  to provide  for a lump sum  change in control  payment in lieu of the
monthly  benefit the  Director  would have been  entitled  to had the  Agreement
continued absent the merger.

         WHEREAS, the Director will be obligated to continue to perform services
on behalf of NYCB for the remainder of the Consulting Agreement term.

         NOW THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the premises and mutual covenants
and conditions hereinafter set forth, the Director and PennFed agree as follows:

         1. New Section 10 shall be added to the Consulting Agreement to read as
follows:

         Section 10.       Change in Control.
                           -----------------

         Upon a Change in Control (as that phrase is defined in Section  409A of
the Code and the  regulations  and  guidance  of  general  applicability  issued
thereunder),  the  Consultant  shall  receive  the "Lump Sum  Change in  Control
Benefit."  The Lump Sum Change in Control  Benefit  is the  equivalent  lump sum
value of the monthly  payments the Director would be entitled to under Section 3
hereof,  assuming the  following:  (a) the  Consultant was a Director of PennFed
until the Change in Control date (the "Change in Control  Retirement Date"); (b)
the Consultant was available to perform consulting  services under the agreement
for ten years from the Change in Control  Retirement  Date; (c) the Consultant's
annual  director fees equal the annual director fees the Consultant is receiving
immediately prior to the Change in Control Retirement Date; and (d) the discount
rate used to  determine  the lump sum value is the rate  referred to in Treasury
Regulation  Section  1.280G-1,  Q&A 32 or its  successor on the first day of the
month next preceding the Change in Control Retirement Date.

         2. The other terms of the  Consulting  Agreement  shall  remain in full
force and effect.


                                       63
<page>

                                          CONSULTANT

                                          ---------------------------


                                          PENNFED FINANCIAL SERVICES

                                          ----------------------------
                                          By:
                                              -----------------------


                                       64
## CITY OF HOUSTON Annise D. Parker Office of the Mayor Mayor P.O. Box 1562 Houston, Texas 77251-1562 Telephone — Dial 311 www.houstontx.gov

May 6, 2015 The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx Secretary of Transportation US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590 The Honorable John F. Kerry Secretary of State US Department of State 2201 C Street NW Washington, DC 20520 Dear Secretaries Foxx and Kerry: As the home to one of the country's ten busiest airports, the City of Houston holds significant interest in ensuring that U.S. airlines — indeed, all air carriers — are provided a fair and level playing field to compete for routes. It creates healthy competition in the marketplace, producing more choices and lower fares for passengers. However, it has been brought to my attention that a small group of state-owned airlines in the Arabian Gulf are alleged to be receiving substantial subsidies from their governments and are therefore violating the longtime Open Skies policy designed to foster healthy competition. I respectfully request the federal government investigate these allegations, and, if proven to be true, take appropriate action by opening a dialogue with the governments of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates to address such subsidies. Regards,

Annise D. Parker Mayor