alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(add

ess) 

Hereby designates, pursuant to section46103 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code (formerly section 1005(b) ofthe Federal Aviation Act 

of 1958, as amended) the person named below as its Agent upon whom service of all notices processes and all orders, decision, 

and requirements of the Department of Transportation may be made for and on behalf of said carrier, hereby canceling all 

previous designations of agents made by it to the DOT. 

Name of Agent ________ J,o>!!s'-"h'-'R""o"'m.......,a""n"'o-"w'--------------------------

Address Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, 1200 Seventeenth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036 

The Agent so designated has wrillen his name and also his initials in the following space: 

Name: _ 

___________ (Initials) ___ 

TN WITNESS WHEREOF, ___..r. A"-'i.!..!rA"'s.,i.,a-"'X'-'B"'e"'r.!!h,.,ad.__ ___ ,--________________ has caused these 

(Name of Company) 

presents to be signed in its name by --,....--- - - - - - - - - ' Chief Executive Officer 

(Please Print) 

of said company, and to be allested under its corporate seal by _ ________ - ---:--::cc-:--:-------

(Sccrctary, or other Title) 

On this ____ day of ______ _, 2015 

ATTEST: 

(Secretary, or other Title) 

OSTF 1010.5 (1-98) 

BENYAMIN ISMAIL 

o\CTING CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

AI RASIA X BERHAO (734161-K)
IdeaPaint

IdeaPaintTM PRO

Certified

Status

10/14/2010 - 10/14/2014

Certificate Period

12690-410

Certificate Number

Products tested in accordance with UL 2821 test method to show compliance to emission limits in UL 2818, Section 7.1.

UL 2818 Standard for Chemical Emissions for Building Materials, Finishes and Furnishings

CERTIFICATE

OF COMPLIANCE

UL Environment investigated representative samples of the identified Product(s) to the identified Standard(s) or other requirements in accordance with the agreements and any applicable program service terms in place between UL Environment and the Certificate Holder (collectively “Agreement”). 

 The Certificate Holder is authorized to use the UL Environment Mark for the identified Product(s) manufactured at the production site(s) covered by the ULE Test Report, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. This Certificate is valid for the identified dates unless there is non-compliance with 

the Agreement.
GREENGUARD Certification Criteria for Building Products and Interior Finishes

Criteria CAS Number

Maximum Allowable 

Predicted Concentration Units

TVOC(A) - 500 μg/m3

Formaldehyde 50-00-0 61.3 (50 ppb) μg/m3

Total Aldehydes (B) - 100 ppb

Particle Matter less than 10 μm (C) - 50 μg/m3

4-Phenylcyclohexene 4994-16-5 6.5 μg/m3

Individual VOCs (D) - 1/10th TLV -

(A) Defined to be the total response of measured VOCs falling within the C6 – C16 range, with responses calibrated to a toluene surrogate.

(B) The sum of all measured normal aldehydes from formaldehyde through nonanal, plus benzaldehyde, individually calibrated to a compound 

specific standard. Heptanal through nonanal are measured via TD/GC/MS analysis and the remaining aldehydes are measured using HPLC/UV 

analysis.

(C) Particle emission requirement only applicable to HVAC Duct Products with exposed surface area in air streams (a forced air test with specific 

test method) and for wood finishing (sanding) systems.

(D) Allowable levels for chemicals not listed are derived from 1/10th of the Threshold Limit Value (TLV) industrial work place standard (Reference: 

American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists, 6500 Glenway, Building D-7, and Cincinnati, OH 45211-4438).

UL Environment investigated representative samples of the identified Product(s) to the identified Standard(s) or other requirements in accordance with the agreements and any applicable program service terms in place between UL Environment and the Certificate Holder (collectively “Agreement”). 

 The Certificate Holder is authorized to use the UL Environment Mark for the identified Product(s) manufactured at the production site(s) covered by the ULE Test Report, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. This Certificate is valid for the identified dates unless there is non-compliance with 

the Agreement.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 26, 2012

d1217

Order 

December 26, 2012

144089(15)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144089

COA: 303355

Wayne CC: 06-005895-FC

CHUCK WILLIAM BACON, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 25, 2012 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
01/23/2012 11:21 FAX 2024935112 FAA . DMS 001/00 3 

RECEIVED 

JAN 1 9 20B U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ,.- , . 

WASHINGTON, DC. HEARING DOCKET 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

ISLAND BIRDS, TNG. 

Respondent 

DOCKJCTNO. FAA-20n-1008 ^ 

FAA CASE NO. 2010SO190309 

V 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

J -: 

•;i>- z2j '- ^ 

a" 

Joint Section 13.217/Rulc 26(i) Report Submitted by Complainant FAA 

and Respondent Island Bird, Inc. 

1. PuTSuai-it to 14 C.F.R. § 13.217 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(1); a tcleconfeTcncc -was he\d on 

January 12, 2012, and was attended by (I) Ryan Landers, counsel for Complainant, and (2) 

Talbot Marrin, counsel for Respondent. 

2. The parties have discussed settlement, but have not reached a settlement. Settlement 

discussions will continue through the discovery phase 

3. The panies will exchange the discovery disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) by 

February 10. 2012. 

4. The panies agree that initial discovery requests will be made by February 10^ 2012. The 

parties will have until March 9, 2012, to respond to initial discovery requests. 

5. The parties agree that follow-up discovery requests will he made by March 23^ 2012. 

The parties have until April 13, 2012, to respond to follow-up discovery requests. 

6. Any objections to discovery requests must be made to the requesting party within two 

weeks of the discovery request. 

7. The parties agree that all dispositive motions must be filed by April 20, 2012. 
- QMS 0)002/00 3 

01/23/201 2 U-2 2 FAX 2024935142 FAA 

S. The panies agree that a irial the week of May 14, 2012, would be best for them. 

Respectively submitted this 1 Sth day of January, 2012. 

Ryan M. Landers 

Kathleen A. Yodice "v^//>-'«Vi... 

^C^AT X ^ - >''U^^^Ju^ 

Talbot M. Martin i^//^r.^ -r^\<ia.-^ 
- nM^ 01003/003 

01/23/2012 11-22 FAX 2024935142 FAA 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Section^ 13.21 7/Rule 26(0 Repon was sent as follows: 

original and one copy via certified mail and Federal Express to; 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washinsion, D.C. 20591 

Attention: Rearing Docket ClcrV., AGC-430 

Wilbiu: Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 

one copy via facsimile, cenified mail, and Federal Express to: 

The Honorable J.E. Sulhvan 

Administrative Law Judge 

OfGce of Hearings, M-20, Room El 2-320 

TJ-S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

East Building Ground Floor 

Washington. DC 20590 

facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

one copy via certified mail and regular mail to: 

Kathleen A. Yodice. Esq. 

411 Aviation Way 

Suite 2i5 

Frederick. MD 21701 

/jU ^ ^.^Miy 

Dated
No. 9367.

#### Boyer, Admr. *v.*The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

(Decided May 1, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Clark county.

*Mr. James Johnson, Jr.,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Bowman & Bowman,*for defendant in error.

*491Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
# Linguist encourages workforce to embrace indigenous cultures during annual Native American observance

/ Published Nov. 15, 2016
PHILADELPHIA, 

America’s indigenous cultures should be embraced, the guest speaker at the annual National American Indian and Alaska Native Heritage Month observance told Naval Support Activity Philadelphia employees Nov. 10. 

Stephanie McKinley is a linguist, global liaison and cultural connector who was born into the Baule Tribe in Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire, West Africa.

“I like the term cultures because we all have different heritage, and it is all valued (in) this nation because we come from different places,” said McKinley.

Navy Cdr. Michael Krisman, material budget officer for NAVSUP Weapon Systems Support, gave the opening remarks and stated there are currently 567 federally recognized American Indian and Alaskan Indian nations.

“During National Native American Indian Heritage Month, we celebrate and honor the culture, tradition and legacy of the indigenous people of America,” said Krisman. “This year’s theme, “Serving our Nations,” reminds us of the dual nature of American Indian citizenship.”

For her presentation, McKinley changed the theme to “Serve our Nation,” making nation singular because she said “all the nations in this nation make our nation. 

McKinley showed two videos to help the audience get into the spirit of the event: Native Americans History and Culture and Oldest Native American footage.

McKinley spoke of the current protest of North Dakota’s Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, which is trying to protect a river from the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

“They fight because the way they see it, they see the earth as a gift and that they came to be the caretaker,” said McKinley.

In closing, McKinley asked the audience to think of today’s youth.

“The youth is the future and the next generation,” said McKinley. “Any youth, whether it is Native American or other, is worth investing in.”

Army Brig. Gen. Charles Hamilton, Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support commander, presented McKinley with a plaque as a thank you for speaking at the observance. 

“I definitely learned something this morning,” said Hamilton. “She is definitely a global human being, and I liked the theme of one nation.”  

The observance was co-hosted by the DLA Troop Support Equal Employment Opportunity and Diversity office and the NAVSUP WSS Equal Opportunity Advisory Committee.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed January 7, 2015.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-01623-CV

IN RE RUBIN CRAIN IV, Relator

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-54318-Y

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Myers, and Stoddart

Opinion by Justice Myers

Relator files this petition for writ of mandamus contending the trial court had no 

jurisdiction to enhance the offense for which he was convicted, the procedure used to enhance 

his offense was illegal, he was denied effective assistance of counsel and his conviction violated 

the prohibition against ex post facto laws and the prohibition against double jeopardy.1

 Each of 

these contentions represents a collateral attack on relator’s judgment of conviction.

 1 The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure include specific requirements concerning the form and contents of a petition for writ 

of mandamus and relator's petition does not comply with those requirements. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3. Relator does not certify his 

petition as required by rule 52.3(j) and he has not provided a mandamus record as required by rule 52.3(k) and 52.7. Although the

deficiencies in relator's petition would in themselves constitute sufficient reason to deny mandamus relief, we address our 

jurisdiction sua sponte, as we must. M.O. Dental Lab. v. Rape, 139 S.W.3d 671, 673 (Tex. 2004) (per curiam) (court must 

review sua sponte issues affecting jurisdiction.)
–2–

The only proper means of collaterally attacking a final felony conviction is via petition 

for writ of habeas corpus under article 11.07 of the code of criminal procedure. TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 5 (West Supp. 2014) (“After conviction the procedure outlined in this 

Act shall be exclusive and any other proceeding shall be void and of no force and effect in 

discharging the prisoner.”); Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1991) (orig. proceeding) (in granting writ of mandamus to vacate judgment of conviction, 

court of appeals usurped the exclusive authority of court of criminal appeals to grant postconviction relief). This Court has no jurisdiction over complaints that should be raised by postconviction habeas corpus proceedings brought under article 11.07. See TEX. CODE CRIM. P. ANN. 

arts. 11.05, 11.07 (West 2005 & Supp. 2014). Accordingly, we DISMISS the petition for want 

of jurisdiction.

141623F.P05

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
November 24, 2015

Shannon Sands

Owner Tosnflies Photography 1039 NW Ogden Ave #2 Bend, Or 97701

Dear Mr. Sands :

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing fro m your petition (Docket

No. FAA−2015

− 3452 )

. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

• Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to

proce ed without this manual and remove closed

- set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

- proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov

. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information ), as well as your comment tracking

number from regulations.gov via e

- mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by D ecember 8, 2015

. I f we do not receive the information

, we will close the dock et without notifying you further.

If you ha ve any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

- 1538

.

Sincerely,

Joshua Parker Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23912]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP96-200-025]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

September 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, NorAm Gas Transmission Company 
(NGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets to be 
effective September 1, 1997:

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 7E
Second Revised Sheet No. 7E.02
Second Revised Sheet No. 7E.03
Second Revised Sheet No. 7G.01
Second Revised Sheet No. 7H

    NGT states that these tariff sheets are filed to reflect revisions 
to identified receipt points and corporate name changes of certain 
shippers with regard to negotiated rate transactions already on file 
with the Commission.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such protests 
must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are 
on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23912 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
132 STAT. 334 PUBLIC LAW 115–131—MAR. 9, 2018 

Public Law 115–131 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to include on the internet website 

of the Department of Veterans Affairs a warning regarding dishonest, predatory, 

or otherwise unlawful practices targeting individuals who are eligible for increased 

pension on the basis of need for regular aid and attendance, and for other 

purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Care Financial Protection Act of 2017’’. 

SEC. 2. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS NOTICE OF DISHONEST, 

PREDATORY, OR OTHERWISE UNLAWFUL PRACTICES TARGETING INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE ELIGIBLE FOR INCREASED 

PENSION ON BASIS OF NEED FOR REGULAR AID AND 

ATTENDANCE. 

(a) NOTICE REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 

include on the internet website of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs a warning to veterans relating to dishonest, predatory, or 

otherwise unlawful practices targeting individuals who are eligible 

for increased pension under chapter 15 of title 38, United States 

Code, on the basis of need for regular aid and attendance. 

(b) GAO STUDY.— 

(1) STUDY REQUIRED.—Not later than 18 months after the 

date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

of the United States shall complete a study on financial exploitation of veterans. Such study shall include— 

(A) an analysis of the types of standards used by 

Federal and State agencies intended to protect vulnerable 

populations from financial exploitation; and 

(B) an analysis of the types of financial exploitation 

facing veterans who are eligible for increased pension under 

chapter 15 of title 38, United States Code, on the basis 

of need for regular aid and attendance and any gaps in 

efforts to address these issues. 

(2) REPORTS.— 

(A) PRELIMINARY REPORT.—Not later than one year 

after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller 

General shall submit to Congress a preliminary report 

on the study required under paragraph (1). 

(B) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after 

the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller 

Deadline. 

38 USC 1501 

note. 

38 USC 101 note. 

Veterans Care 

Financial 

Protection 

Act of 2017. 

Mar. 9, 2018 

[H.R. 3122] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
PUBLIC LAW 115–131—MAR. 9, 2018 132 STAT. 335 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3122: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–385 (Comm. on Veterans’ Affairs). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 163 (2017): Nov. 6, considered and passed House. 

Vol. 164 (2018): Feb. 15, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

General shall submit to Congress a final report on such 

study. 

Approved March 9, 2018. 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.6 CERTIFICATION
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND
SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
OF THE UNITED STATES CODE Agrium Inc. (the Company) is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the Report) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. I, Michael M. Wilson, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 14, 2005/s/ Michael M. WilsonName:
    Michael M. WilsonTitle:
    President & Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



CERTIFICATION
REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND
SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
OF THE UNITED STATES CODE Agrium Inc. (the Company) is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the Report) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. I, Bruce G. Waterman, Senior Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: February 14, 2005/s/ Bruce G. WatermanBruce G. WatermanSenior Vice President, Finance &
Chief Financial Officer 14
# L_2011234EN.01004201.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 234/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 234/42

---

DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

of 8 September 2011

appointing a judge to the Court of Justice

(2011/532/EU)

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 19 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 253 and 255 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Articles 5 and 7 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and following the resignation of Ms Pernilla LINDH, a judge should be appointed to the Court of Justice for the remainder of Ms Pernilla LINDH’s term of office, which runs until 6 October 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Articles 5 and 7 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and following the resignation of Ms Pernilla LINDH, a judge should be appointed to the Court of Justice for the remainder of Ms Pernilla LINDH’s term of office, which runs until 6 October 2012.

| (2) | Mr Carl Gustav FERNLUND has been proposed for the vacant post. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Mr Carl Gustav FERNLUND has been proposed for the vacant post.

| (3) | The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on Mr Carl Gustav FERNLUND’s suitability to perform the duties of Judge of the Court of Justice, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on Mr Carl Gustav FERNLUND’s suitability to perform the duties of Judge of the Court of Justice,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Carl Gustav FERNLUND is hereby appointed Judge to the Court of Justice for the period from 6 October 2011 to 6 October 2012.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 8 September 2011.

The President

J. TOMBIŃSKI

---