alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Trenton TAYLOR, Appellant, v. Marie Delia TAYLOR, Appellee.

No. HH-265.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 19, 1978.

Lester Makofka, of Makofka & Beatty, Jacksonville, for appellant.

James I. Riley, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Husband contends on his appeal from a final judgment of dissolution that the trial court erred in awarding wife the use and occupancy of the parties’ marital home. We disagree and affirm. Although the award was not made pursuant to an award of child custody or as lump sum alimony, the record reveals that wife at the time of dissolution was a 56-year-old woman in *489rather poor health with only an eighth grade education. Her employment experience was limited to work at a textile mill early in the marriage and a brief stint as a Christmas salesclerk for W. T. Grant Company more than ten years ago. In addition the testimony established that Mrs. Taylor was somewhat handicapped by her inability to speak English without a pronounced accent.

The facts here are remarkably similar to those in *McDonald v. McDonald,*346 So.2d 610 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), in which this court affirmed a similar award to a 39-year-old wife with a seventh grade education who had worked as a waitress, clerk, school bus driver and nurses’s aide. See Opinion of Mills, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. If anything, the facts here are more compelling than those in *McDonald,*supra. The trial court did not err in its award. Husband’s other points being without merit, the judgment is affirmed.

Wife’s attorney’s fees for this appeal are provisionally granted in accordance with this court’s opinion in *Dresser v. Dresser,*350 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

MILLS, Acting C. J., dissents.

MILLS, Acting Chief Judge,

dissenting:

I dissent.

Exclusive possession of jointly owned property can only be awarded to a mother with minor children in her custody or as lump sum alimony. *Ranes v. Ranes,*311 So.2d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); *Saviteer*v. *McAdoo,*310 So.2d 28 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).

There were no minor children in this case nor was the exclusive use and occupancy of the marital home awarded to Mrs. Taylor as lump sum alimony. The court erred in its award of the use and occupancy of the home by Mrs. Taylor and erred in denying Mr. Taylor’s prayer for partition of the jointly owned property.

I would deny Mrs. Taylor’s motion for attorney’s fees.
# Diario Oficial C 83I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 083I |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 64.° año12 de marzo de 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 083I

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

64.° año12 de marzo de 2021

---

| Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Información |
| | INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LOS ESTADOS MIEMBROS |
| 2021/C 83 I/01 | Información comunicada por los Estados miembros en relación con el cierre de pesquerías | 1 |

Sumario

Página

IV   Información

INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LOS ESTADOS MIEMBROS

2021/C 83 I/01

Información comunicada por los Estados miembros en relación con el cierre de pesquerías

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

IV Información

INFORMACIÓN PROCEDENTE DE LOS ESTADOS MIEMBROS

| 12.3.2021 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CI 83/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2021

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CI 83/1

---

Información comunicada por los Estados miembros en relación con el cierre de pesquerías

(2021/C 83 I/01)

De conformidad con el artículo 35, apartado 3, del Reglamento (CE) n.o 1224/2009 del Consejo, de 20 de noviembre de 2009, por el que se establece un régimen de control de la Unión para garantizar el cumplimiento de las normas de la política pesquera común (1), se ha decidido el cierre de la pesquería indicada en el cuadro siguiente:

| Fecha y hora del cierre | 24.12.2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Duración | Del 24.12.2020 al 31.12.2020 |
| Estado miembro | Portugal |
| Población o grupo de poblaciones | ALB/AN05N |
| Especie | Atún blanco del norte (Thunnus alalunga) |
| Zona | Océano Atlántico, al norte del paralelo 5° N |
| Tipos de buques pesqueros | --- |
| Número de referencia | 40/TQ123 |

Fecha y hora del cierre

24.12.2020

Duración

Del 24.12.2020 al 31.12.2020

Estado miembro

Portugal

Población o grupo de poblaciones

ALB/AN05N

Especie

Atún blanco del norte (Thunnus alalunga)

Zona

Océano Atlántico, al norte del paralelo 5° N

Tipos de buques pesqueros

---

Número de referencia

40/TQ123

---

(1)  DO L 343 de 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
255 La. 242

#### Jean A. QUARTEMONT, et al. v. AVOYELLES PARISH POLICE JURY.

No. 50291.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1970.

In re: Jean A. Quartemont and Charles F. Dupuy applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Avoyelles. 228 So.2d 199.

The application is denied. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
# L_2023219EN.01000401.xml

| 6.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 219/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 219/4

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/1689

of 30 August 2023

entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Twaróg wędzony (TSG))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Twaróg wędzony’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 50(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Twaróg wędzony’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Twaróg wędzony’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Twaróg wędzony’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Twaróg wędzony’ (TSG) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.3. Cheeses, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 August 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 160, 5.5.2023, p. 97.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### Kenneth BLYTHE, Appellant, v. R. W. WILLIAMS and Dorothy Williams, his wife, d/b/a Peace Valley Campgrounds, and Florida Farm Bureau Insurance Company, a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 76-786.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 21, 1978.

Rehearing Denied April 6, 1978.

*335Gary H. Neely, Peter Keating, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert K. Rouse, Jr. of Smalbein, Eu-bank, Johnson, Rosier, & Bussey, P. A., Daytona Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered against the appellant, Kenneth Blythe, on his claim against the appel-lees, R. W. Williams and Dorothy Williams, his wife, d/b/a Peace Valley Campgrounds, and Florida Farm Bureau Insurance Company, for injuries sustained when Blythe struck his head while diving into a “swimming hole” located in the Peace Valley Campgrounds. Blythe charged the campgrounds with negligence in the erection and maintenance of a cable swing provided at the swimming hole for the use of campground tenants such as Blythe. Specifically, it was claimed that the swing was unsafe in that it extended over an area of shallow water; and further, that no warnings were provided as to the possible danger involved in diving from the swing into the shallow waters near the shore. The appel-lees claim that Blythe is precluded from recovering because he concedes that he checked the depth of the water near the swing before using the swing. Blythe testified in deposition that he did not know where in the water he landed when he was injured. He contends that he had little control as to where he could dive into the water because of the nature of the swing and that it was unsafe to provide the swing at all. We believe that reasonable persons could differ on these factual issues as to whether the campground was negligent in providing the swing or in failing to provide warnings as to its use, and the issue of Blythe’s negligence in using the swing after checking the water depth. We do not believe it was proper to resolve these issues by summary judgment. *Holl*v. *Talcott,*191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is hereby reversed with directions for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED WITH DIRECTIONS.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., and FO-GLE, HARRY W., Associate Judge, concur.
----

hib

| 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        Date: May 22, 2009 |    |                                  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------|---------------------------------------|
|                                                         | Signed: | /s/ Kelvin Claney                     |
|                                                         |    | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                                         |    |                                  |
|                                                         | Signed: | /s/ Karl Redekopp                     |
|                                                         |    | Chief Financial Officer               |

----
#### Umbelino BANGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-51.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 10, 1969.

Appeal from Court of Record, Brevard County; Joe A. Cowart, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Rufus FAIRLEY v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 49953.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 9, 1977.

W. S. Murphy, Lucedale, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Wayne Snuggs, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and ROBERTSON and SUGG, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, George County; Merle F. Palmer, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
#### FORTE TOWERS SOUTH, INC., a Florida corporation, d/b/a Forte Towers South, Appellant, v. David COBDEN and Selma Cobden, his wife, Appellees. CUSTOM CRAFT MARBLE & STONE COMPANY, Inc., a Florida Corp., Appellant, v. David COBDEN and Selma Cobden, his wife, Appellees.

Nos. 69-468, 69-486.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 27, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 20, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# DoD Fresh program highlighted in new video

/ Published Sept. 29, 2017
PHILADELPHIA, 
The partnership between the Defense Logistics Agency and the Department of Agriculture that helps provide fresh fruits and vegetables to school children is highlighted in a new DLA video.

Subsistence acquisition professionals in DLA Troop Support manage the DoD Fresh Program, and in coordination with the USDA’s National School Lunch Program, they provide fresh produce to 12,000 schools in 48 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and Guam.

The partnership started in 1993, when USDA representatives saw advantages in partnering with DLA Troop Support, Kathleen Staley of USDA’s Food Distribution Division said in the video.

“We looked around, and lo and behold, the Department of Defense provides food for all of their military bases and has a wonderful procurement system – the Defense Logistics Agency.” she said. “When you talk about partnership, I think this is a great success story between the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Department of Defense, leveraging existing systems and providing a healthy, nutritious, high-quality product.”

DLA Troop Support uses its large-scale buying power and its large network of produce suppliers to help meet the demand for consistent, weekly deliveries of a wide variety of fresh produce to school cafeterias, central kitchens and state distribution centers. 

Pat Scott, division chief of garrison feeding in Subsistence, said the success of the partnership is largely due to Subsistence field representatives who work with customers.

“We have our customer reps throughout the United States that are hands-on, face-to-face with customers. They’re the go-to person whenever there’s any kind of problems or issues,” she said.

Kimberly Williams, a food service administrator with Elsie Whitlow Stokes Community Freedom Public Charter School in Washington, D.C., said the online ordering system is user-friendly and provides access to a large variety of produce.

“It’s super-easy to order online,” she said. “And so our kids are exposed to so many more things besides the typical fruits and vegetables you might see in the grocery store.”

The partnership also makes financial sense for many schools that purchase fresh produce with food entitlement funds provided by the USDA. 

Cindy Hormel, the school nutrition program director for Alexandria Public Schools in Virginia, said, “As a food service director, I am very appreciative that this opportunity is provided to us in a way that we can use our entitlement dollars, and in some aspects, it even allows us to stretch our entitlement dollars.”

The top 10 fruits and vegetables ordered in school year 2016-17 were:
      - Apple Slices
      - Strawberries
      - Apples
      - Romaine Salad Mix
      - Oranges
      - Pears
      - Cucumbers
      - Broccoli Florets
      - Spinach
      - Celery Sticks

Visit the USDA’s DOD Fresh program website for more information.
Mattamuskeet National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan 

M

a

tt

a

m

u

s

k

e

e

t

N

a

t

i

o

n

a

l W

i

l

d

l

i

f

e R

e

f

u

g

e

Comprehensive Conservation Plan

M

a

tt

a

m

u

s

k

e

e

t

N

a

t

i

o

n

a

l W

i

l

d

l

i

f

e R

e

f

u

g

e

USFWS Photo

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
guidance for

d strategies

e Fish and

e plans detail

ally above

for Service

s. The plans do

erational and

uisition.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-2-23-000]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes In 
FERC Gas Tariff

September 3, 1997.
    Take notice that Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company (Eastern Shore) 
tendered for filing on August 28, 1997 certain revised tariff sheets in 
the above captioned docket as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, with a proposed effective date of October 1, 
1997.
    The purpose of the instant filing is to revise Eastern Shore's Rate 
Schedule CWS and CFSS Demand Rates, respectively, to track the cost of 
storage service purchased from Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation 
(Columbia) under their Rate Schedules FSS and SST, the costs of which 
are included in the rates payable under Eastern Shore's Rate Schedule 
CWS and CFSS.
    Eastern Shore states that copies of the filing have been served 
upon its jurisdictional customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23771 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
DISMISS ; and Opinion Filed April 8, 2016. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 16
- 00120
- CV THE ESTATE OF CARMEL INA “MILLIE” SMITH, BY AND THROUGH ITS R EPRESENTATIVE, CHRIS TINE FABER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL KNOWN HEIRS , Appellant V. COLLIN CREEK ASSISTE D LIVING CENTER, INC . D/B/A DAYSPRING ASSI STED LIVING COMMUNIT Y , Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219
- 02547
- 2015



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Lang

- Miers and Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Appellant appeals the trial court’s January 19, 2016 interlocutory order dismiss ing its claims against appellee for failure to file an expert report. Appellant’s claims against a second defendant remain pending in the trial court. In its brief on the merits , appellee asserts that this Court lacks jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal. We agree. A party may bring an interlocutory appeal of rulings in medical liability cases in two circumstances. First, a party may appeal when the trial court denies a motion to dismiss under section 74.351(b) for failure to file an expert report. See T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN
. § 51.014(a)(9) (West Supp. 2015 ). Second, a party may app eal when a trial court grants a motion to dismiss pursuant to 75.351(l), based on a timely served, but inadequate, expert report. See– 2

– T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN
. § 51.014(a)(10) (West Supp. 2015 ). The order appealed in this case, however, grants dismissal based on failure to serve an expert report. The civil practice and remedies code does not authorize appeal of such orders. See Fisher v. Medical Center of Plano , No. 05

- 14

- 01441

- CV, 2015 WL 73441, at *2 (Tex. App.

— Dallas Ja n. 6, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.); T EX
. C IV
. P RAC
. & R EM
. C ODE A NN
. § 51.014(a)(9), (10). Because the order is neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory order, this Court lacks jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(a).

160120F.P05 / Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

THE ESTATE OF CARMELINA “MILLIE” SMITH, BY AND THROUGH ITS REPRESENTATIVE, CHRISTINE FABER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL KNOWN HEIRS, Appellant
No. 05

- 16

- 00120

- CV V.
COLLIN CREEK ASSISTED LIVING CENTER, INC. D/B/A DAYSPRING ASSISTED LIVING COMMUNITY, Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas. Trial Court Cause No. 219

- 02 547

- 2015. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang

- Miers and Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee COLLIN CREEK ASSISTED LIVING CENTER, INC. D/B/A DAYSPRING ASSISTED LIVING COMMUNITY recover its costs of this appeal from appellant THE ESTATE OF CARMELINA “MILLIE” SMITH, BY AND THROUGH ITS REPRESENTATIVE, CHRISTINE FABER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL KNOWN HEIRS.
Judgment entered this 8th day of April, 2016.
Exhibit 32.1


  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Big Sky Industries I,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the quarter  ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Ramon
Chimelis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


    Date: August 24, 2007                           /s/Ramon Chimelis
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Ramon Chimelis
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.1





Statement
of Chief Executive Officer Furnished


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned, Richard B. Collins, is
the President and Chief Executive Officer of United Financial Bancorp, Inc. (the
“Company”).





This statement is being furnished in
connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”).





By execution of this statement, I
certify that to the best of my knowledge:





A)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))
      and





B)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
  Report.





This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to United Financial Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by United
Financial Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.











August 8,
      2008
            /s/ Richard B.
      CollinsDated
            Richard
      B. CollinsChairman,
      President and Chief Executive
Officer




37