alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 30159 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v. DOUGLAS BEER,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:16 -CR- 107 -1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Douglas Beer appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possession of child pornography of a minor not yet 12 years of age. He contends that the district court’s statements at the sentencing hearing indicate that it plainly erred in concluding that it did not have the discretion to disagree with the U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2 enhancement s and impose a downward variance based on the mitigating facts and circumstances in his case. Beer maintains that a

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 19, 201 7 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-30159 Document: 00514162118 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/19/2017No. 17

- 30159

2 downward variance was warranted because he had no criminal history, his offense was passive possession, and he had attempted to overcome his
addic tions to pornography and alcohol by attending individual and group counseling. As Beer concedes, he did not raise this argument in the district court and, therefore, review is limited to plain error. See United States v. Garcia

Perez , 779 F.3d 278, 281 (5th Cir. 2015). To demonstrate plain error, Beer must establish a clear or obvious error that affects his substantial rights. See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). If he makes such a showing, this court has the discretion to correct the error but only if it seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. See id. The record indicates that the district court did not fail to recognize that it had the discretion to vary from the guidelines range. The district court considered Beer’s lengthy sentencing memorandum, his letter to the court, the
letters written in his support , the Presentence Report, and the 1 8 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. Based on that information, the district court made an individualized assessment of his case and determined that a sentence slightly
below the a dvisory guidelines range would be appropriate under the
circumstances. Therefore, the record reflects that the district court did not fail to recognize that it had the discretion to vary from the guidelines range and did not commit reversible plain error when it sentenced Beer to a slight downward variance of 57 months of imprisonment. See United States v. Clay , 787 F.3d 328, 332 (5th Cir. 2015); United States v. Robinson , 741 F.3d 588, 601 (5th Cir. 2014). AFFIRMED. Case: 17-30159 Document: 00514162118 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/19/2017
### Floods of June 1965 in South Platte River basin, Colorado

By: Howard Frederick Matthai

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wsp1850B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Infinex Ventures, Inc. (the
  "Company") on 10Q SB for the period ending July 31, 2003, as filed with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mario
  Aiello, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
  U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
  of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                    
|2. | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        result of operations of the Company.

Date: September 12, 2003.

| | /s/Mario Aiello        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | (Signature)            
| |                        
| | Chief Executive Officer
| |                        
| | (Title)                

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23559]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM97-12-29-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

August 29, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 26, 1997 Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, Eighth Revised Sheet No. 28, to 
be effective August 1, 1997.
    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is to track 
rate changes attributable to storage service purchased from Texas 
Eastern Transmission Corporation (TETCO) the costs of which are 
included in the rates and charges payable under Transco's Rate Schedule 
S-2. The tracking filing is being made pursuant to Section 26 of the 
General Terms and Conditions of Transco's Volume No. 1 Tariff.
    Transco states that included in Appendix B attached to the filing 
is the explanation of the rate changes and details regarding the 
computation of the revised Rate Schedule S-2 rates.
    Transco states that copies of the filing are being mailed to each 
of its S-2 customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, Washington, DC, 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23559 Filed 9-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Alex
Werber, the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of Tissera,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended October
31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      January 22, 2009By:
      /s/Alex WerberName:
      Alex WerberTitle:
      Chief Financial Officerand
      Chief Accounting
Officer
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

lUCK PERRY GOVERNOR
June 24, 2011

Alfredo "AI" Armendariz, Ph.D. Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, Region 6 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 RE: Proposed Listing ofthe US Oil Recovery Site onthe federal National Priorities List Dear Dr. Armendariz: Texas supports the decision thatthe US Oil Recovery site be considered as a candidate site for the federal National Priorities List (NPL) for cleanup. The Texas Commission on Environmental Qualitybelieves thatthis site is eligible for the proposedNPL listing based on agency evaluationofthe siteunder the federal Hazard Ranking System.

# ~~J Rick Perry Governor RP:tbp
cc: Bryan W. Shaw, Ph.D., Chairman, TCEQ Mark R. Vickery, P.G., Executive Director, TCEQ Mr. John Sadlier, Deputy Director, Office ofCompliance and Enforcement, TCEQ Mr. BrentWade, Director, Remediation Division, TCEQ Mr. Sam Coleman, Superfund Division Director, EPA Ms. Wren Stenger, SuperfundAssociate Director, EPA Mr. John Meyer, ChiefRisk and Site Assessment, EPA Ms. BrendaNixon Cook, Region 6, NPL Coordinator, EPA

PosT OmcE Box 12428 Ausrm, TEXAS 78711 (512)463-2000 (VorCE)/DIAL 7-1-1 FOR RELAY SERVICES VISIT www.TEXAsONUNE.COM 1HE OFFiciAL WEB Srrn OF THE STAlE OF TEXAS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 177 (Friday, September 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 48127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24253]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA, Inc., Special Committee 186; Automatic Dependent 
Surveillance--Broadcast (ADS-B)

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is hereby given for Special 
Committee 186 meeting to be held September 29-October 3, 1997. The 
meeting will start at 9:00 a.m. on Monday, September 29, and will 
continue through Friday, October 3. The meeting will be held at RTCA, 
Inc., 1140 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1020, Washington, DC, 20036.
    The agenda will include: (1) Chairman's Introductory Remarks/Review 
of Meeting Agenda; (2) Review and Approval of Minutes of the Previous 
Meeting; (3) Report of Working Group Activities: a. Editorial Committee 
Report; b. Progress Update on the 1090 MHz MOPS; c. CDTI Working Group 
Report; (4) Formation of Working Group 4 to Explore Using ADS-B 
Information for Collision Avoidance; (5) Ballot Review and Approval of 
the ADS-B MASPS (Only Written Comments Will Be Considered); (6) Other 
Business; (10) Date and Place of Next Meeting.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the RTCA Secretariat, 
1140 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 1020, Washington, DC 20036; (202) 
833-9339 (phone); (202) 833-9434 (fax); or http://www.rtca.org (web 
site). Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 5, 1997.
Janice L. Peters,
Designated Official.
[FR Doc. 97-24253 Filed 9-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### REED v. BELDNER CABS, INC., et al.

No. 38263.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSteady and unsteady transonic pressure measurements on a clipped delta wing for pitching and control-surface oscillationsSteady and unsteady pressures were measured on a clipped delta wing with a 6-percent circular-arc airfoil section and a leading-edge sweep angle of 50.40 deg. The model was oscillated in pitch and had an oscillating trailing-edge control surface. Measurements were concentrated over a Mach number range from 0.88 to 0.94; less extensive measurements were made at Mach numbers of 0.40, 0.96, and 1.12. The Reynolds number based on mean chord was approximately 10 x 10 to the 6th power. The interaction of wing or control-surface deflection with the formation of shock waves and with a leading-edge vortex generated complex pressure distributions that were sensitive to frequency and to small changes in Mach number at transonic speeds.Document ID19880019511Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsHess, Robert W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Cazier, F. W., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Wynne, Eleanor C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1986Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberL-16082NASA-TP-2594NAS 1.60:2594Accession Number88N28895Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-33-43-09Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880019511.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 
  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June
16, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods referred to in the Form 10-Q.
 /s/ Eric J. FossEric J. FossPresident andChief Executive OfficerJuly 24, 2007
# DSCR Environmental Cleanup Program discussed at RAB meeting 

/ Published July 12, 2018
RICHMOND, VA, 
Community members attended the Defense Logistics Agency Installation Operations Richmond’s Environmental Cleanup Program quarterly Restoration Advisory Board meeting July 9 at the Bensley Community Center in Chesterfield County, Virginia.

About a dozen people attended the meeting.

David Hufford, environmental engineer, Environmental Office, DLA Installation Operations Richmond, gave an update to several ongoing projects, including groundwater sampling at Defense Supply Center Richmond; Operable Unit 6: groundwater impacted from the open storage, landfill, and National Guard areas; Operable Unit 7: groundwater impacted from the fire training area; and Operable Unit 8: groundwater impacted by former acid neutralization pit operations.

Hufford said DLA established a RAB for DSCR back in January 2002 to provide a forum for the community to be involved in DSCR’s environmental cleanup. 

He said when it was created, there was a great deal of anxiety and misunderstandings within the community.

“This is a way to keep the channels of communications open between us and the community. We want them to know if they have any questions, we are here to give them an answer,” Hufford said. 

As an advisory board, the RAB makes suggestions, recommendations and comments on issues concerning investigations and remediation activities. It is made up of local citizens, DLA representatives, business groups and personnel from the Environmental Protection Agency, Virginia’s Department of Environmental Quality and Chesterfield County. The RAB is co-chaired by a DSCR representative and a community representative.

The next meeting will be held Oct. 17 at the Bensley Community Center and is open to the public.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          57,856
<SECURITIES>                                    96,600
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        354
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,777
<PP&E>                                          14,909
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,284
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,231
<BONDS>                                          2,814
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                     150,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,284
<SALES>                                        327,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               350,151
<CGS>                                          279,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,943
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 292
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,815
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,338
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,477
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,477
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49


</TABLE>
### SERVED: October 7, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF REDEMPTION, INC. DOCKETNO. FAA 2014- 0115 (Civil Penalty Action)

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER We do not anticipate reaching this case priorto January 2015. Unless specifically changedherein all prior orders remain in effect. WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following procedural schedule: 1. On or before January 9, 2015, theparties shall conclude all discovery including, butnot limitedto, depositions, document production, responses to production requests and/or interrogatories. Ifthe parties cannotresolve a discovery dispute they shall submitthe dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 2. The parties shall be prepared to presentthis case at a hearing onorafter January 9, 2015, subjectto the availability ofcourtroom facilities. The specific date and time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List



### 1 '-- c:: {-,SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation·Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W.
·Washington, DC 20591

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

BrentR. Cole, Respondent's Counsel Law Office ofBrentR. Cole, P.C. 821 N Street , Suite 208 Anchorage AK 99501 TEL: 907-277-8001 FAX: 907-277-8002 ONE COPY

Craig Wm. Black, Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Regional Counsel 222 West

## ih Avenue, #14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 TEL: 907-271-5269 FAX: 907-271-2800 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536
. Docket No. FAA-2014-0115 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
SERVED SEPTEMBER 25, 2012 . . · · . ,~ /~~~RTMENT OF . . .. :,;>;\N,SPORTATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIQ}'j(\tl 0PERATION0 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS .. . 'J 

In The Matter Of: 

KALITTA AIR, LLC 

Respondent 

WASHINGTON, DC lUll 2b A g: 33. 

) 

) 

') 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0782 

Case No. 2011-GL-23-0099 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On September 24,2012, the Respondent, Kalitta Air, LLC,filed a one-page letter 

stating that it was Withdrawing its Request for Hearing to the Complaint issued by the 

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on July 16,2012. The Respondent's letter of 

Withdrawal stated that the parties had reached a settlement. There is no hearing cu~ently 

set in this matter. 

It Is Hereby Ordered: · · 

1) The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, set for October 31, 2012 ·at 

1:30pm Eastern time, is cancelled. · 

2) Pursuant to 14 C.P.R. §13.215, the Respondent, KalittaAir, LLC, has 

Withdrawn its Request for Hearing, and this proceeding is dismissed with 

prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: . Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WI0001 

George W. Kelsey, Respondent's Counsel 

Kalitta Air, LLC 

2395 S. Huron Parkway, Suite 200 

Ann Arbor, MI 48104 

TEL: 734-973-1222 

FAX: 734-973-1223 

Chris G. Zurales, Complainant's Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K 

Federal Aviation Administration 

. 2300 East Devon A venue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 

TEL: 847-294-7713 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

ONE COPY 

The Ho~orable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0782 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in p~rson or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.