alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, George E. Crapple, Co-Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Millburn Ridgefield Corporation, the Managing Owner of The MillburnWorld Resource Trust (the “Trust”), do hereby certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K of The Millburn World Resource Trust;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, thisannual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this annualreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Trust as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;

 

4. The Trust’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Trust and have:

 

  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Trust,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Trust’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

 

  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Trust’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Trust’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Trust’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of thisannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.  The Trust’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the Trust’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Trust’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Trust’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the Trust’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| By: /s/ George E. Crapple  |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |
|                       |
| George E. Crapple          |
| Co-Chief Executive Officer |
| March 30, 2006             |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,646,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,013,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  232,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,891,000
<PP&E>                                         240,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (82,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,128,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,732,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,537,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,128,000
<SALES>                                      4,989,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,989,000
<CGS>                                        8,875,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,875,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (39,389,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             421,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (42,372,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (16,803,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (25,569,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                               1,320,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (24,249,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (3.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.97)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 11

                         The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.
               Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
                      (in millions, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                 12-weeks Ended                24-weeks Ended
                                                                 --------------                --------------
                                                             June 14,       June 15,       June 14,       June 15,
                                                               2003           2002           2003           2002
                                                               ----           ----           ----           ----
Number of shares on which basic earnings
  per share is based:

<S>                                                             <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
  Average outstanding during period................             273            283            276            282
  Add - Incremental shares under stock
   compensation plans..............................               6             13              7             12
                                                               ----           ----           ----           ----

Number of shares in which diluted
   earnings per share is based.....................             279            296            283            294

Net earnings applicable to common
   shareholders ...................................           $ 131          $ 139          $ 164          $ 193

Net earnings on which diluted earnings
   per share is based .............................           $ 131          $ 139          $ 164          $ 193

Basic earnings per share...........................           $0.48          $0.49          $0.59          $0.68

Diluted earnings per share.........................           $0.47          $0.47          $0.58          $0.66
</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1997 

To authorize the Secretary of Energy to establish a program of energy 

assistance grants to local educational agencies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 10, 2005 

Mr. HARKIN (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. BINGAMAN, and 

Mr. REED) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Energy to establish a program 

of energy assistance grants to local educational agencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘School Energy Crisis 

5 Relief Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SCHOOL ENERGY GRANTS. 

7 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM.—The Secretary 

8 of Energy shall establish a program to make grants to 

9 eligible local educational agencies, from allocations under 

10 subsection (c), that have experienced the highest percent-
2 

•S 1997 IS

1 age increase or expenditure increase in transportation and 

2 heating fuel costs among all local educational agencies in 

3 the State for a specific time period during the 2005–2006 

4 school year, in comparison to the same time period during 

5 the 2004–2005 school year. 

6 (b) ELIGIBLE LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES.— 

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para8 graph (2), a local educational agency shall be eligible 

9 for a grant under this section if the local educational 

10 agency is among the top 10 percent of all local edu11 cational agencies in its State for numbers or per12 centages of children counted under section 1124(c) 

13 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 

14 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6333(c)). 

15 (2) EXCEPTION.—In the case of a State with 

16 fewer than 50 school districts, a local educational 

17 agency shall be eligible for a grant under this section 

18 if the local educational agency is among the highest 

19 of all local educational agencies in its State for num20 bers or percentages of children counted under sec21 tion 1124(c) of the Elementary and Secondary Edu22 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6333(c)). 

23 (c) STATE ALLOCATION.—Each State shall receive, 

24 in the aggregate, an amount based on— 
3 

•S 1997 IS

1 (1) the population of children between ages 5 

2 and 17 of the State according to the most recent 

3 Census, in comparison to all other States; and 

4 (2) the regional cost of transportation and heat5 ing fuel, in comparison with the average national 

6 cost, as determined by the most recent statistical 

7 data from the Energy Information Administration. 

8 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

9 (1) LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCY.—The term 

10 ‘‘local educational agency’’ has the meaning given 

11 that term in section 9101 of the Elementary and 

12 Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801). 

13 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means each of 

14 the several States of the United States and the Dis15 trict of Columbia. 

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47786-47787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24002]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-197, RM-9154]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Goldsmith, TX

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Wild 
West Broadcasting Company, Inc., proposing the allotment of Channel 
234A at Goldsmith, Texas, as the community's first local aural 
transmission service. Channel 234A can be allotted to Goldsmith in 
compliance

[[Page 47787]]

with the Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a 
site restriction of 11.9 kilometers (7.4 miles) southwest. The 
coordinates for Channel 234A at Goldsmith are 31-54-26 NL and 102-42-14 
WL.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before October 27, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before November 12, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Gerald 
K. Reid, President, Wild West Broadcasting Company, Inc., P.O. Box 663, 
505 NW 10th Street, Andrews, Texas 79714 (Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam Blumenthal, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-197, adopted August 
27, 1997, and released September 5, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW, Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also 
be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 
857-3800, 1231 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-24002 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
No. 00-7372.

#### Ellis *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0613

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RYAN PATRICK MORRIS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 28, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 21 2020

05/21/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0613
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23929]



[[Page 47658]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. TM98-1-92-000]


Mojave Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

September 4, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, Mojave Pipeline Company 
(Mojave) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to become 
effective October 1, 1997:

First Revised Sheet No. 11

    Mojave states that it is tendering this tariff sheet to reflect 
that the Annual Charge Adjustment to be collected for the fiscal year 
beginning October 1, 1997 is to be $0.0021 per dth.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with 
Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commisson's Rules and Regulations. 
All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23929 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 10:35 AM

To: 'Jeffrey@antonelli-law.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Inform ation - iCam Copters, LLC

Dear Mr. Jeffrey J. Antonelli:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2015

‐ 0180). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

• Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed

‐ set filming

from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 4/21/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDynamic characteristics of a vibrating beam with periodic variation in bending stiffnessA detailed dynamic analysis is performed of a vibrating beam with bending stiffness periodic in the spatial coordinate. The effects of system parameters on beam response are explored with a perturbation expansion technique. It is found that periodic stiffness acts to modulate the modal displacements from the characteristic shape of a simple sine wave. The results are verified by a finite element solution and through experimental testing.Document ID19880014604Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsTownsend, John S.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1987Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-2697NAS 1.60:2697Accession Number88N23988Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880014604.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLaminar Flow Aircraft CertificationVarious topics telative to laminar flow aircraft certification are discussed. Boundary layer stability, flaps for laminar flow airfoils, computational wing design studies, manufacturing requirements, windtunnel tests, and flow visualization are among the topics covered.Document ID19880014353Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference ProceedingsAuthorsWilliams, Louis J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1986Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.55:2413NASA-CP-2413L-16111Accession Number88N23737Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-41-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880014353.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitleN88-23738 through N88-23749Workvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23549]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-443-001]


Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

August 29, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 26, 1997, Northern Border Pipeline 
Company (Northern Border) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to 
become effective September 25, 1997:

Substitute First Revised Sheet Number 119
First Revised Sheet Number 121
First Revised Sheet Number 123
Second Revised Sheet Number 124

    Northern Border asserts that the purpose of this filing is to make 
further revisions in its tariff in addition to the proposed tariff 
changes initially filed in this docket on August 8, 1997 in compliance 
with Order No. 636-C, issued February 27, 1997, in Docket Nos. RM91-11-
006 and RM87-34-072. In Order No. 636-C, the Commission required that 
any pipeline with a right-of-first refusal tariff provision containing 
a contract term longer than five years revise its tariff to reflect the 
new five year cap.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23549 Filed 9-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
No. 00-7268.

#### Acosta-Gonzalez *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
255 La. 544

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Phillip O. HUDGINS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 50395.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 1970.

In re: Phillip O. Hudgins applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
#### Burton GOLDBERG, Trustee, and Joyce Goldberg, his wife, and Sailboat Day, Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioners, v. The CECO CORPORATION, a foreign corporation, Respondent.

No. 38435.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 1, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 5, 1970.

Richard L. Lapidus, Miami, for petitioners.

Gerald M. Walsh, of Walsh & Dolan, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Writ of certiorari having heretofore issued, argument having been heard, and the court having examined the record and briefs, it appears that the writ was improvidently issued. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this cause is discharged. See Conway v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Fla.1966), 185 So.2d 697.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, C. J., concurs specially with opinion.

ERVIN, Chief Justice

(concurring specially) :

I agree to the Court’s judgment herein but would go a step further and construe the mechanic lien statutes to make no unequal distinctions between any subcontractors (sub-sub-sub, etc.) where timely and appropriate notices of their lien claims are given. See my dissent in Conway v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., supra.