alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 167 (Thursday, August 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22931]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology


Announcement of an Opportunity To Join a Cooperative Research and 
Development Consortium on Optical Properties of Materials

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 
invites interested parties to attend a meeting on October 7, 1997, to 
discuss setting up a cooperative research consortium. The goal of the 
consortium is to identify critical industrial needs for NIST to be 
involved in performing high accuracy measurements, developing necessary 
standards and critically evaluating existing data on the optical 
properties of materials that are important for the evolving optical 
industries in the USA.

DATES: The Meeting will take place at 10 a.m. on October 7, 1997. 
Interested parties should contact NIST to confirm their interest at the 
address, telephone number or FAX number shown below.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at and inquiries should be sent 
to Room B268, Building 221, National Institute of Standards and 
Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Raju Datla, 301-975-2131; FAX 301-840-8551.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The program will be within the scope and 
confines of the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-
502, 15 U.S.C. 3710a), which provides federal laboratories including 
NIST, with the authority to enter into cooperative research agreements 
with qualified parties. Under this law, NIST may contribute personnel, 
equipment, and facilities--but no funds--to the cooperative research 
program.
    Members will be expected to make a contribution to the consortium's 
efforts in the form of personnel, data, and/or funds. This is not a 
grant program.
    The R&D staff of each industrial partner in the Consortium will be 
able to interact with NIST researchers on generic measurement needs in 
the industry for specific optical properties of materials. The 
industrial partners will also be able to schedule at NIST collaborative 
projects in which they could participate. All partners will receive a 
copy of all data on all materials measured. All partners will have a 
certain amount of NIST measurements made on materials they request. All 
partners have some influence as to the type and accuracy of the 
measurements pursued by the consortium.

    Dated: August 22, 1997.
Elaine Bunten-Mines,
Director, Program Office.
[FR Doc. 97-22931 Filed 8-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-M
#### Isaac ALDRIDGE v. Eva Mary ALDRIDGE.

Civ. 1514.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

Sept. 13, 1978.

*262Bryce U. Graham, Tuscumbia, for appellant.

Robert I. Rogers, Jr., Russellville, for ap-pellee.

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

The husband was found to be in contempt for failure to make child support payments and was ordered to pay the amount of $2,800 to the wife for all arrearage. The husband appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for new trial.

The wife argues that the husband has erred in his choice of method of review to this court. It is well established that the proper remedy for review of contempt proceedings is habeas corpus if the party is in jail, or by certiorari if the party is not, and appeal is not proper. *Killingsworth v. Killingsworth,*284 Ala. 524, 226 So.2d 308 (1969); and *Stout v. Stout,*336 So.2d 1123 (Ala.Civ.App.1976).

However, as in *Reeder v. Reeder,*356 So.2d 202 (Ala.Civ.App.1978), we will treat the matter as a review by certiorari and proceed accordingly. We consider the jurisdiction of the court sufficiently invoked. *Armstrong v. Green,*260 Ala. 39, 68 So.2d 834 (1953).

The wife testified that she obtained a divorce from her husband in the Circuit Court of Franklin County in 1956 after a twenty-one year marriage. They had nine children at that time, five of whom were minors. She further testified that the husband was ordered to pay her $85 per month as support for the five minor children, and that she received payments up until December of 1957, but none thereafter. No other witness testified.

The trial judge heard the evidence. He determined there was an arrearage of support due of $2,800. He found the husband in contempt for failure to make such payments, and directed that he purge himself by paying the arrearage.

The husband contends there was a lack of evidence to establish that an arrearage existed and that he was in contempt of court. Specifically, the husband cites the wife’s failure to introduce into evidence the final divorce decree of the parties or any records of the register to show whether or not child support payments had been made.

The scope of review in contempt cases on certiorari is limited to questions of law. *Ex parte Abercrombie,*277 Ala. 479, 172 So.2d 43 (1965). Questions of fact, if there is any evidence to support the lower court’s decree, will not be disturbed. *Hardy v. Hardy,*46 Ala.App. 249, 240 So.2d 598 (1970).

It is a well established rule of appellate review that where a trial court makes a decree after hearing witnesses ore tenus, every presumption will be indulged in favor of the trial court and its findings will not be disturbed unless palpably wrong. *Cowden v. Hughes,*353 So.2d 505 (Ala.1977); *Casey v. Beck,*350 So.2d 429 (Ala.1977); 2A Ala. Digest, Appeal and Error 931(1).

*263There was uncontradicted evidence in the form of the wife’s testimony upon which the trial court could have based its findings. There was no objection at trial to any part of the wife’s testimony. Therefore, we find no error in the proceedings below, and accordingly affirm the trial court.

AFFIRMED.

BRADLEY and HOLMES, JJ., concur.
p. 1



# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 49 ) ll-E- 9
Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:04

AM Sheet 49 of 264P. 2

CONTAC T REPOR T FOR

M PE S PROJEC T NO . N20 4

Dat e Compan

y Contac t Phon e 08/23/9 3 LASC O JohnDavenpor t (800 ) 876-304 4 Environmenta l Affair s Descriptio n Th e Lancaster , Texas , facilit y ha s a nincinerato r currentl y operatin g fo r styren e emissions . Thre e spray booth s ar e enclose dfo r routin g o f gelcoatin g an dspray-u pemissions . Th e uni t wa s pu t i nabou t 1 0 year s ag o a t a cos t o f abou t $750,000 . Th e efficienc y i s 95 % + . Th e styren e emission s ar e no t highconcentration s (<5 0 ppm ) an dar e pulle dwit hexistin g ai r i nth e booth . N o pre-concentratin g i s done . Th e prime reaso nth e uni t wa s installe dwa s odo r an dpersona l plan t goals , no t regulation . Mr . Davenpor t di dno t kno w i f thei r facilit y

wa s a majo r sourc e (1 0 tons ) o r not . H e indicate dtha t Si dPe , Corporat e Environmenta l Manager , wa s a bette r contac t t o tal kwith , Anaheim , Californi a (800/877-2005) . H e als o sai dtha t tw

o othe r LASC O facilitie s hav e anincinerator , Elizabethtown , Pennsylvania , an dSout hBoston , Virginia . H e ha dno t heard o f th e ide a o f Sout hBosto ntakin g thei r uni t ou t a s PE S ha s previousl y heard .
# L_2023073EN.01006701.xml

| 10.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 73/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 73/67

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/387 of 20 February 2023 in support of a global reporting mechanism on illicit conventional arms and their ammunition to reduce the risk of their diversion and illicit transfer (‘iTrace V’)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 53 of 21 February 2023
  )

Page 21, Article 2, paragraph 2:

for:

‘2.   The technical implementation of the project referred to in Article 1 shall be carried out by Conflict Armament Research Ltd (‘CAR’).’,

read:

‘2.   The technical implementation of the project referred to in Article 1 shall be carried out by Conflict Armament Research (‘CAR’).’.

---
No. 9328.

#### The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago *&*St. Louis Railway Co. *v.*Bost.

(Decided April 10, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Clark county.

*Messrs. Bowman £ Bowman,*for plaintiff in error.

*.-■Mr. John L. Zimmerman*and *Mr. W.- W. Witmeyer,*for defendant in error.

*476On rehearing. Foimer judgment adhered to.

Price, Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23864]



[[Page 47669]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than September 24, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. James Homer Shields, III, London, England; to acquire an 
additional 2.84 percent, for a total of 11.49 percent, of the voting 
shares of Sebastian Bankshares, Inc., Barling, Arkansas, and thereby 
indirectly acquire River Valley Bank and Trust, Lavaca, Arkansas.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Judy Noe Myers, Dallas, Texas; to retain a total of 14.82 
percent of the voting shares of Rusk County Bancshares, Inc., 
Henderson, Texas, and thereby indirectly retain Peoples State Bank, 
Henderson, Texas.
    2. Carmen P. Smith Family Limited Partnership; Carmen P. Smith; and 
Peggie J. Woodruff, as General Partners, all of Wichita Falls, Texas; 
to acquire 14.61 percent of the voting shares of AmeriBancShares, Inc., 
Wichita Falls, Texas, and AmeriBancShares of Delaware, Inc., 
Wilmington, Delaware, and thereby indirectly acquire American National 
Bank, Wichita Falls, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 4, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-23864 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EXHIBIT 10.1

                                 Promissory Note

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE                     US $ 3,650
                                 ---------------


This promissory note replaces the promissory note dated October 5, 1999
originally signed by Mr. Harry Miller ("Mr. Miller") and Medina Coffee, Inc.
("Medina").

Mr. Miller has advanced a total of US$ 3,650 Dollars to Medina on various dates
between October 1999 and September 2001.

For value received, Medina promises to pay to Mr. Miller, the sum of US$ 3,650
Dollars (the "Debt"). The Debt is without interest.

Medina agrees to repay the Debt on demand. Mr. Miller is under no obligation to
renegotiate the terms of repayment or to defer payments.

Medina agrees that if it fails to repay the Debt as required under this Note,
Mr. Miller may, without notice, proceed to exercise any and all of the rights
and remedies under this Note or at law or in equity, on the occurrence of any
such default or at any other time. Mr. Miller may exercise any and all rights
which will be cumulative and not mutually exclusive.

Medina understands that failure to repay the Debt in accordance with this Note
will be considered a default. If Note is placed in the hands of an attorney for
collection after default, Medina agrees to pay reasonable attorneys' fees
actually incurred, plus costs.

The entire Debt is immediately due and payable in the event of the following:
insolvency of Medina; if bankruptcy proceedings are instituted against Medina;
dissolution of Medina; or in the event there is any deterioration, depreciation
or impairment in the value of the assets of Medina.

This Note is to be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of
Washington State.


Date:    September 17, 2001
                   --
                               MEDINA COFFEE, INC.

                                /s/ Harry Miller
                               -----------------------------------------
                               By: Harry Miller, Sole Officer & Director
Case 4:04-cr-00334-JEJ Document 75 Filed 01/24/06 Page 1 of 4
Case 4:04-cr-00334-JEJ Document 75 Filed 01/24/06 Page 2 of 4
Case 4:04-cr-00334-JEJ Document 75 Filed 01/24/06 Page 3 of 4
Case 4:04-cr-00334-JEJ Document 75 Filed 01/24/06 Page 4 of 4
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 1 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 2 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 3 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 4 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 5 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 6 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 7 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 8 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 9 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 10 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 11 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 12 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 13 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 14 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 15 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 16 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 17 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 18 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 19 of 20
Case 4:04-cv-02275-JEJ Document 177 Filed 07/30/10 Page 20 of 20
Exhibit  32.1
                                                                   -------------

                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                              A Nevada corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  AlphaTrade.com.  (the
 "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
 Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, PENNY
 PERFECT, Chief Executive Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350,
 as adopted  pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
 the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




         Dated: July 30, 2004                      /s/ Penny Perfect
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Its: Chief Executive Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
         other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
         signature that appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of
         this  written  statement  has been  provided to the Company and will be
         retained by the Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing  certifications are
         accompanying  the Company's Form 10-QSB solely  pursuant to section 906
         of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
         1350,  chapter  63 of title 18,  United  States  Code) and is not being
         filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.













                                      32.1-1
#### Johnnie S. CATCHES, Sr., Appellant, v. Barbara Ann CATCHES, Appellee.

No. GG-331.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 25, 1978.

John L. Myrick, of Myrick & McKenzie, Pensacola, for appellant.

W. H. F. Wiltshire, of Harrell, Wiltshire, Stone & Swearingen, Pensacola, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals the trial court’s permanent alimony award to wife in a dissolution proceeding. On consideration of the record, the briefs and the oral argument, we find that the award of permanent, as opposed to rehabilitative, alimony is justified in view of wife’s unrebutted testimony at trial that she was then being treated for a heart condition and had been instructed by her doctor to resign her employment. We note that the award is subject to modification if wife recovers and is able to work in the future. Husband’s other points are without merit.

Wife’s petition for an award of attorney’s fees incurred in defending this appeal will be granted provisionally in accordance with this court’s opinion in *Dresser v. Dresser,*350 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
# Agency employees share holiday spirit with their neighbors

/ Published Dec. 7, 2018
Battle Creek, Michigan, 
Once again Defense Logistics Agency employees in Battle Creek, Michigan, connected with the community to help those in need enjoy the holiday season through the employees’ contributions to the Salvation Army’s Adopt-A-Family program.

After weeks of collecting items on each adopted family’s wish list, volunteers delivered the many boxes of gifts and food items to the Salvation Army Worship and Community Center for distribution. DLA Disposition Services Director Mike Cannon was among the senior leaders and volunteers who came to help organize the boxes for the delivery to the intended families.

“I’m very humbled to see how generous the workforce is at the Federal Center,” Cannon said. “I walked around yesterday and virtually every office in the building had boxes out collecting things, including extras that the families had not requested to add things people thought the families might need.” 

Don Phillips, **DLA Installation Support at Battle Creek site director,**said the operation shows how really integrated DLA activities are here. Phillips said it is “an honor to serve the Battle Creek community.” 

Elli Blonde, marketing manager for the Morale, Welfare and Recreation program, coordinated the collection efforts among the different activities supporting 71 families.

“We have 134 individuals (adults and children) being assisted, and each family has a veteran,” Blonde said.

Kevin Faber, the local DLA Information Operations “mayor,” said he “really likes the idea of the community helping the community.” Ray Zingaretti, Logistics Information Services director, said the support for the campaign seems to get bigger every year and added that “the generosity of the employees is tremendous.”

Leann Gaviglio, a management assistant in DLA Installation Support, served as the delivery and volunteer coordinator, and noted that there never seems to be a problem getting enough donations.

“People will surprise you,” Gaviglio said. “Things keep pouring in, especially in the last few days.”

The Adopt-A-Family program has local roots in a partnership that began during the Korean War. At that time, the Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center was the Percy Jones Army Hospital. The Salvation Army identified local families and children in need and military and civilian personnel at the hospital purchased items to fill the needs.  

Tiffany Schmidt, MWR chief, looked forward to seeing this year’s families arrive to get their items. 

“The best present is to see the smiles on people’s faces,” Schmidt said.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2603]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-802]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public that a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Procedures 
Advisory Committee (ATPAC) will be held to review present air traffic 
control procedures and practices for standardization, revision, 
clarification, and upgrading of terminology and procedures.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 7, and Wednesday, 
February 8, 2012 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at FAA Building FOB 10A, 800 
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Gary Norek, ATPAC Executive 
Director, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the ATPAC to be held Tuesday, February 7, 
and Wednesday, February 8, 2012 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    The agenda for this meeting will cover a continuation of the 
ATPAC's review of present air traffic control procedures and practices 
for standardization, revision, clarification, and upgrading of 
terminology and procedures. It will also include:
    1. Approval of Minutes;
    2. Submission and Discussion of Areas of Concern;
    3. Discussion of Potential Safety Items;
    4. Report from Executive Director;
    5. Items of Interest; and
    6. Discussion and agreement of location and dates for subsequent 
meetings.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
available. With the approval of the Chairperson, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons desiring to attend 
and persons desiring to present oral statements should notify Mr. Gary 
Norek no later than January 25, 2012. Any member of the public may 
present a written statement to the ATPAC at any time at the address 
given above.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 5, 2012.
Gary A. Norek,
Executive Director, Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2012-802 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.28


Schedule to Senior Vice President Change of Control Agreement


The following is a list of our executive officers who are party to the Company’s Senior Vice President Change of Control Agreement, the form of which was filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended 12/29/2012:


Peter J. Valenti, III
Thomas A. West