alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating Partners 1994-D, Ltd's balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         485,796
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  247,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               733,138
<PP&E>                                         4,509,703
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (549,631)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,693,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          23,912
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,658,632
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,693,210
<SALES>                                        1,125,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,188,819
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  590,874<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                497,802
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            497,802
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   497,802
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative
and interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### Peter NIKOLAS, Appellant, v. Constantine D. ALLEN and Coula C. Allen, Appellees.

No. 69-488.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 30, 1969.

Ronald S. Golub, Miami, for appellant.

Frank & Grossman, Miami Beach, Stephens, Demos, Magill & Thornton, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HEN-DRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The husband in a divorce case transferred a large sum of money to the appellant. The money was gathered together by the liquidation of almost all of the husband’s assets, and the transfer was made five days before the husband filed suit for divorce. The trial court found that the transfer was fraudulent. The appellant, who had received the funds, brings this appeal to reverse the judgment in favor of the appellee, the wife in the divorce case.

Two points are presented. The first urges that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment. We have reviewed the record and hold that the evidence is sufficient. See Frell v. Frell, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 706.

The second point urges error in the denial of appellant’s petition for rehearing which was based upon newly discovered evidence. The alleged newly discovered *57evidence did not meet the requirements set out in Dade National Bank of Miami v. Kay, Fla.App.1961, 131 So.2d 24, and Drew v. Chambers, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 589. Therefore no error has been shown.

Affirmed.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 20, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00930-CV MARISA READUS, Appellant V. MAA MARKET CE NTER, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 004-02141-2022 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burn s, Justice Molberg, and Justice Pedersen, III Opinion by Chief Justice Burns The filing fee and clerk’s record in this case have not been filed. By postcard September 21, 2022, we notif ied appellant the $205 filing f ee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressl y cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismi ssal of the appeal. On December 5, 2022, we sent a letter informing a ppellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s reco rd. We directed appellant to provide, within ten days, verification she had either paid for or made a rrangements to pay for the record or was entitled to proceed w ithout payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismi ssal of this appeal without–2– further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided the required documentation, or otherwise co rresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

220930F.P05 /Robert D. Burns, III / ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT MARISA READUS, Appellant

No. 05-22-00930-CV V. MAA MARKET CENTER, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 004-02141- 2022. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Burns. Justices Molberg and Pedersen, III participating. In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered December 20, 2022
#### Helen P. AMMEAN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION DIVISION, Respondents.

No. DD-204.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 8, 1977.

Helen P. Ammean, in pro. per.

Alex D. Littlefield, Jr., Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari is DENIED. *Luzier v. Florida Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission,*307 So.2d 503 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1975) and *Florida State University v. Jenkins,*323 So.2d 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
#### Violet J. BECKER, Appellant, v. Harold A. MILLER and Elmer E. Blackburn, Co-Partners doing business as Miller & Blackburn, Appellees.

No. 69-43.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 17, 1969.

July 25, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                               LeCROY CORPORATION

                           Subsidiaries of the Company



The following are the subsidiary companies of the Company as of August 1, 1998,
all of which are 100% owned:

Name                                Jurisdiction of Incorporation
----                                -----------------------------

Digitech Industries, Inc.           Connecticut

LeCroy, S.A.                        Switzerland

LeCroy, Ltd.                        England

LeCroy, G.m.b.H.                    Germany

LeCroy, S.A.R.L.                    France

LeCroy, S.R.L.                      Italy

LeCroy Foreign Sales Corporation    U.S. Virgin Islands

LeCroy Japan Corporation            Japan

LeCroy, Pty.                        Australia

LeCroy Corporation                  Hong Kong

LeCroy Korea Ltd.                   South Korea

Preamble Instruments, Inc.          Delaware



                                       46
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,139
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,570
<INVENTORY>                                     51,290
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,266
<PP&E>                                          42,444
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 458,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,016
<BONDS>                                        281,094
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           39,785
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   458,399
<SALES>                                        177,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,836
<CGS>                                          118,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (311)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,884
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,169
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,669
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       500
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 44648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18464]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Research, Engineering and Development Advisory Committee

    Pursuant to section 10(A)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting 
of the FAA Research, Engineering and Development (R,E&D) Advisory 
Committee.
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Name: Research, Engineering & Development Advisory Committee.
    Time and Date: September 21, 2011--9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Place: Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, 
SW.--Round Room (10th Floor), Washington, DC 20591.
    Purpose: The meeting agenda will include receiving from the 
Committee guidance for FAA's research and development investments in 
the areas of air traffic services, airports, aircraft safety, human 
factors and environment and energy. Attendance is open to the 
interested public but seating is limited. Persons wishing to attend the 
meeting or obtain information should contact Gloria Dunderman at (202) 
267-8937 or gloria.dunderman@faa.gov. Attendees will have to present 
picture ID at the security desk and be escorted to the Round Room.
    Members of the public may present a written statement to the 
Committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC on July 14, 2011.
Paul Fontaine,
Director (A), Research & Technology Development.
[FR Doc. 2011-18464 Filed 7-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**INFINEX
      VENTURES INC.**


OFFICER’S
      CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of INFINEX VENTURES INC. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending **April
      30,2007** as
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, **Michael
      DeRosa** ,
      Chief
      Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our
      knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated
      June 14, 2007





/ s/
      Michael DeRosa


Michael
      DeRosa


Chief
      Executive Officer


Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Southwest Music Distribution, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Michery, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 18, 2006

/s/ David MicheryDavid Michery, President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.2


                              AUTEC ASSOCIATES INC.
                             38 EAST OSCEOLA STREET
                              STUART, FLORIDA 34994




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2002 of Autec Associates Inc., a Florida corporation
(the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Arthur Garrison, President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   I, Arthur Garrison, have read the Quarterly Report;

     2.   to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report fully complies with
          the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
          Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;

     3.   to the best of my knowledge, the information in the Quarterly Report
          is true in all important respects as of the nine-month period ended
          September 30, 2002;

     4.   the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operation of the Company; and

     5.   the Quarterly Report contains all information about the Company of
          which I am aware that I believe is important to a reasonable investor
          as of the nine-month period ended September 30, 2002.



                                       /s/  Arthur Garrison
Date: October 31, 2002                      ------------------------------------
                                            Arthur Garrison, President and Chief
                                            Financial Officer
No. 00-7163.

#### Wiseman *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1876 

To provide that attorneys employed by the Department of Justice shall 

be eligible for compensatory time off for travel under section 5550b 

of title 5, United States Code. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 17, 2005 

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide that attorneys employed by the Department of 

Justice shall be eligible for compensatory time off for 

travel under section 5550b of title 5, United States Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMPENSATORY TIME OFF FOR TRAVEL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Attorneys employed by the De5 partment of Justice (including assistant United States at6 torneys) shall be eligible for compensatory time off for 

7 travel under section 5550b of title 5, United States Code, 

8 without regard to any provision of section 115 of the De9 partments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, 
2 

•S 1876 IS

1 and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2000 (as en2 acted into law by section 1000(a)(1) of Public Law 106– 

3 113 and made permanent by section 111 of Public Law 

4 106–553). 

5 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall apply with 

6 respect to time spent in travel status on or after the date 

7 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### Jackie Ben SMITH v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50471.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 22, 1978.

Jan R. Butler, Eupora, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Catherine W. Underwood, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LEROY SHAW, :

:

Plaintiff :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-04-1217

:

ARTHUR R. THOMAS, ET AL., :

: (Judge McClure)

Defendants :

ORDER

April 25, 2006

Background

Leroy Shaw (“Plaintiff”), an inmate presently confined at the Cambria

County Prison, Ebensburg, Pennsylvania, filed this pro se civil rights action. 

Service of the complaint was previously ordered. Named as Defendants are the

following officials of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (“Parole

Board”): ex-Chairman William F. Ward; Secretary Kathleen Zwierzyna; ex-Chief

Counsel Robert Campolongo, Esq.; Assistant Counsels Tara L. Patterson, Esq.

and Arthur Thomas, Esq.

Case 4:04-cv-01217-JFM-JVW Document 27 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 3
2

By Memorandum and Order dated August 22, 2005, the Defendants’ motion

to dismiss the complaint was granted in part. The following claims remain: (1)

Defendants subjected Plaintiff to a retaliatory, excessive incarceration between

December 13, 2002 to December 31, 2002; and (2) Defendants Ward, Thomas

and Zwierzyna subjected Plaintiff to excessive incarceration through their

miscalculation of his credit for time served. On October 11, 2005, Plaintiff filed a

motion seeking entry of summary judgment. See Record document no. 20. 

Presently pending is the Defendants’ motion to strike Shaw’s summary judgment

motion.

Discussion

A review of the docket establishes that Plaintiff has not filed a brief in

support of his summary judgment motion. M.D. Pa. Local Rule 7.5. requires that

a party who files a pretrial motion must submit a brief in support of said motion

within ten (10) days of its being filed with the court. If a supporting brief is not

timely filed, “such motion shall be deemed to be withdrawn.” 

Since Shaw has neither filed a brief supporting his summary judgment

motion nor sought a motion requesting additional time to do so, Defendants’

motion to strike will be granted. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be

Case 4:04-cv-01217-JFM-JVW Document 27 Filed 04/25/06 Page 2 of 3
3

deemed withdrawn under Local Rule 7.5. Consequently,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants’ motion to strike (Record document no. 21)

is granted.

2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Record

document no. 20) is deemed withdrawn for failure to

submit a supporting brief as required by M.D. Pa. Local

Rule 7.5.

 s/ James F. McClure, Jr. 

JAMES F. McCLURE JR.

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-01217-JFM-JVW Document 27 Filed 04/25/06 Page 3 of 3
LT



# Features Advantages

INPUTS 3DR imagery support Process images taken by original 3DR Mapping Platforms Ground Control Point edit or import (.csv, .txt) Import and edit Ground Control Points to improve the accuracy of your project Local, global and arbitrary coordinate reference system support in meter and feet Choose from all known coordinate systems or your own local system Camera position and exterior orientation (omega, phi, kappa) support Calculate optimized camera position and exterior orientation from a low grade GPS and without any IMU

PROCESSING Rapid Check processing mode Process initial project results in low-resolution in minutes only Rapid Check Quality report Assess quality and completeness of acquired i mages while still on site
Camera self-calibration Optimize internal camera parameters, such as focal length, principal points and lens distortions, without the need of a camera calibration report Automatic Aerial Triangulation (AAT) and Bundle Block Adjustment (BBA) Process automatically with or without known camera position and exterior orientation Quality report Assess quality of projects Project merging Process parts of projects individually and merge them into one project Project area definition Import (.shp) or draw specific orthomosaic and point cloud densification/filtering areas to generate results inside specific boundaries

RAYCLOUD EDITOR Project viewing Assess flight plan, camera positions, inspect automatic keypoint matching and add uncalibrated cameras Manual tie point editing Annotate and edit GCPs (2D & 3D), Check Points and Manual Tie Points with the highest accuracy, using both original images and 3D information at the same time Project reoptimization Reoptimize camera positions and rematch images based on GCPs and manual tie points to improve reconstruction of difficult areas Fly-through animation Create a virtual camera trajectory in the 3D point cloud, play the animation in real-time, export the animation as a video (in mp4 and avi format) and the flightpath waypoints in CSV format

OUTPUT RESULTS 2D output results • Geo-referenced orthomosaics in GeoTIFF output format

• Google tiles export in KML and HTML output format

• Mapbox tiles in MB format Fly-through animations and flightpaths Point cloud Fly-through animation in MP4 and AVI format 

# LT 3DR Edition | Feature List | Version 1.2

Hardware specifications: Minimum requirements: Windows 64bit / Vista, 7, 8, Server / 2-Core CPU / 4GB RAM Recommended: 6-Core CPU i7 or Xeon / 32GB RAM (or more depending on dataset size)
256 La. 258

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Raymond WILLIAMSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 50634.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Raymond Williamson applying for writ of habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
#### Benjamin Lee KNEPPER and Mary Knepper, his wife, Appellants, v. Edgar SLOVAK and Marian Slovak, his wife, Appellees.

No. 69-50.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Dec. 12, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

AVERY SOUFFRANT

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1182

[ August 23, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael Lynch , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 13

- 242CF10A

.

Avery Souffrant, Lake Butler, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, T AYLOR and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.