alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

            <ARTICLE>                           9
            <CIK>                               1075945
            <NAME>                              New Commerce BanCorp

         <S>                     <C>
            <PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
            <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Dec-31-2000
            <PERIOD-START>                      Jan-01-2000
            <PERIOD-END>                        Mar-31-2000
            <CASH>                              1,830,572
            <INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>              0
            <FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                    1,508,719
            <TRADING-ASSETS>                    0
            <INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>         6,453,066
            <INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>              940,302
            <INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                900,916
            <LOANS>                             13,766,952
            <ALLOWANCE>                         206,504
            <TOTAL-ASSETS>                      28,038,429
            <DEPOSITS>                          19,004,383
            <SHORT-TERM>                        0
            <LIABILITIES-OTHER>                 120,068
            <LONG-TERM>                         0
            <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
            <PREFERRED>                         0
            <COMMON>                            10,000
            <OTHER-SE>                          8,903,978
            <TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>        28,038,429
            <INTEREST-LOAN>                     316,429
            <INTEREST-INVEST>                   111,169
            <INTEREST-OTHER>                    47,139
            <INTEREST-TOTAL>                    474,737
            <INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                  200,507
            <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  200,507
            <INTEREST-INCOME-NET>               0
            <LOAN-LOSSES>                       20,304
            <SECURITIES-GAINS>                  0
            <EXPENSE-OTHER>                     378,501
            <INCOME-PRETAX>                     (101,724)
            <INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>          (101,724)
            <EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
            <CHANGES>                           0
            <NET-INCOME>                        (71,763)
            <EPS-BASIC>                       (.07)
            <EPS-DILUTED>                       (.07)
            <YIELD-ACTUAL>                      4.63
            <LOANS-NON>                         0
            <LOANS-PAST>                        0
            <LOANS-TROUBLED>                    0
            <LOANS-PROBLEM>                     0
            <ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                    195,800
            <CHARGE-OFFS>                       9,600
            <RECOVERIES>                        0
            <ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                   206,504
            <ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                206,504
            <ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                 0
            <ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>             0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I, T. Justus Homburg, certify that:

     1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Progen Industries
Limited;

     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.     The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

          (a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
          such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

          (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure
          controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
          about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
          of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
          evaluation; and

          (c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
          covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control
          over financial reporting; and

     5.     The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of
directors:

          (a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
          design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
          are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
          or other employees who have a significant role in the company's
          internal control over financial reporting.

Date:   December 21, 2006

                                    /s/ T. Justus Homburg
                                 ------------------------
                                 Managing Director
# Armament Airmen lay down the steel 

/ Published March 31, 2017
SHAW AIR FORCE BASE, S.C., The 43 Airmen assigned to the 20th Equipment Maintenance Squadron aircraft armament systems flight work around the clock to guarantee the weapons and launchers on F-16CM Fighting Falcons are ready to eliminate their target when fired.This flight is tasked with maintaining the machinery needed for Falcons, and the pilots who control them, to accomplish their primary mission of suppressing enemy air defenses.“In order to help the pilots complete their mission they will need proper weaponry,” said Master Sgt. James White, 20th EMS arms and military equipment NCO in charge. “We check to make sure that all equipment going on the aircraft is torn apart, inspected and sent back out for installation, ensuring pilot and aircraft safety.”These Airmen maintain armament to include the M-61A1 20 mm multi-barrel cannon, LAU-117/118 armament launchers, and the weapon pylons used for equipping launchers onto the aircraft.On average the Airmen assigned to the armament flight inspect, repair and send out approximately 1,800 pieces of equipment and weaponry annually to support worldwide SEAD operations.“Being the flight that maintains and supplies the steel for the pilots is pretty impactful, said Airman 1st Class Spencer Laird, 20th EMS aircraft armament systems technician.“When you get to assemble the pieces that make up these guns and launchers, it gives you a better understanding of the power that they provide for the aircraft,” said Laird.Working around the clock, 20th EMS armament flight Airmen provide F-16s with the firepower needed to accomplish the mission.*Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Shaw Air Force Base website.*
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3738-000]


Tucson Electric Power; Notice of Filing

August 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 5, 1997, Tucson Electric Power Company 
tendered for filing an amendment in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 285.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before September 3, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22771 Filed 8-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### D. C. CARTER a/k/a Johnnie Carter v. Raymond E. FORD.

No. 38811.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
Exhibit  32.1
                                                                  -------------

                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                              A Nevada corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Penny
Perfect, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




         Dated: August 10, 2006                    /s/ Penny Perfect
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Its: Chief Executive Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
         other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the

         signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
         this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
         retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are
         accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906
         of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
         1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
         filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.













                               Exhibit 32.1 - 1
# DLA Troop Support employees strengthen partnership with FEMA reps in New York 

/ Published Aug. 13, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 
Employees from the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support strengthened their partnership with the Federal Emergency Management Agency Region II team during a visit Aug 7.

The visit to the regional office in Manhattan, New York allowed the two agencies to learn about each other’s missions, capabilities and responsibilities for future operations planning and management.

“Region II is hoping to familiarize itself with the myriad of DLA resourcing capabilities,” Jason Wind, FEMA Region II Acting Response division director, said. “Gaining knowledge from this visit will allow Region II to incorporate DLA into its plans and source strategies.”

Each of DLA Troop Support’s five supply chains were represented at the meeting. 

Troy Vokes, Construction and Equipment Plans and Integration Office chief, helped coordinate the visit and said it opened dialogue on improving support to FEMA during a disaster. 

“Defense support to civil authorities support is a very dynamic endeavor,” Vokes said. “Working side by side with our FEMA partners helps both parties ensure a quick and more thorough response, which helps save lives and mitigate property damage.”

The FEMA Region II office serves New York, New Jersey, U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico.

According to a DLA article on preparing for the 2018 hurricane season, DLA Troop Support supported FEMA and U.S. Northern Command hurricane relief operations with approximately 88.1 million meals, 738 lines of pharmaceuticals, 1,264 generators and hundreds of thousands of gallons of water in 2017.

Wind says the regional offices do not often get involved with DLA directly, but he expects a mutually beneficial relationship moving forward.
 “This partnership will allow FEMA Region II to add additional ‘tools’ to its toolbox to support jurisdictions during disaster response,” Wind said. “It also may create opportunities for DLA to send representatives to the Regional Response Coordination Center or downrange with the Incident Management Assistance Team to assist with the leveraging of these resourcing capabilities.”
Exhibit








        


  Exhibit 10.3
     
 Privileged & Confidential


October 19, 2015
Emad Rizk
Chief Executive Officer


Amendment to the Retention and Severance Bonus Agreement
Dear Emad:
This letter amends that certain Retention Bonus and Change of Control Severance Agreement, dated August 12, 2015 (the “Retention and Severance Agreement”) by and between you and Accretive Health, Inc. (the “Company”). 
 Specifically, Section 2(a) of the Retention and Severance Agreement is hereby amended by replacing (i) “$3,000,000” with “$3,750,000” and (ii) both instances of “$1,500,000” with “$1,875,000”.  Additionally, Section 3(a) of the Retention and Severance Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the words “two times” therein with the words “two and one-half times”. 
Except as specifically set forth herein, the Retention and Severance Agreement and all of its terms and conditions remain in full force and effect, and the Retention and Severance Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects, except that on or after the date of this Amendment, all references in the Retention and Severance Agreement to “this letter agreement,” “Agreement,” “hereto,” “hereof,” “hereunder,” or words of like import shall mean the Retention and Severance Agreement as amended by this letter.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this letter agreement effective as of the day and year first written above.
Accretive Health, Inc. 




By:_/s/ Daniel A. Zaccardo_____________
Name: Daniel A. Zaccardo    
Title:   Senior Vice President, General Counsel &  Corporate Secretary




Accepted and Agreed:
/s/ Emad Rizk________
Emad Rizk



1
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                                   EXHIBIT D-6

                          FULL RECOURSE PROMISSORY NOTE

$1,000,000.00                                               Saratoga, California
                                                            May 1, 2002


        FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Wei-Shin Tsay, promises to pay to
the order of Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the
"Company"), the principal sum of one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) with
interest from the date hereof at a rate of zero percent (0.0%) per annum,
payable on August 25, 2004.

        This Note is secured by a pledge of shares of Common Stock of the
Company, and is subject to all of the terms and provisions of a Restricted Stock
Purchase Agreement between the undersigned and the Company (the "Agreement").
Notwithstanding such pledge, the undersigned understands that this is a full
recourse promissory note.

        The undersigned further agrees that, in the event that his employment by
or association with the Company is terminated for any reason prior to payment in
full of this Note, this Note shall be accelerated and all remaining unpaid
principal shall become due and payable within 30 days after such termination.

        If an action is instituted for collection of this Note, the undersigned
agrees to pay court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by the holder
hereof.

        This Note may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

        This Note and the obligations hereunder shall be governed by and
construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

        This Note, effective May 1, 2002, replaces the note between the Company
and Wei-Shin Tsay signed August 25, 2000. In conjunction with the execution of
this Note, Wei-Shin Tsay agrees to pay the Company one hundred twelve thousand
and thirty five dollars and seven cents ($112,035.07) by July 31, 2002,
satisfying the accrued interest due through April 30, 2002 on the original note
dated August 25, 2000.

                                                       /s/ Wei-Shin Tsay
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                          Wei-Shin Tsay
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1729 

To extend the time during which persons affected by Hurricane Katrina 

may appeal certain decisions of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals that 

are rendered during the period beginning June 1, 2005, and ending 

November 30, 2005. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2005 

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend the time during which persons affected by Hurricane Katrina may appeal certain decisions of the Board 

of Veterans’ Appeals that are rendered during the period 

beginning June 1, 2005, and ending November 30, 2005. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR APPEAL OF CERTAIN 

4 DECISIONS RENDERED BY BOARD OF VET5 ERANS’ APPEALS. 

6 (a) APPEAL PERIOD.—Notwithstanding section 

7 7266(a) of title 38, United States Code, a Hurricane 

8 Katrina-affected person adversely affected by a final deci-
2 

•S 1729 IS

1 sion of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, which is rendered 

2 during the period beginning on June 1, 2005, and ending 

3 on November 30, 2005, may file a notice of appeal with 

4 the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims at any time be5 fore the expiration of 240 days after the date on which 

6 notice of such decision is mailed pursuant to section 

7 7104(e) of such title. 

8 (b) DEFINITION.—In this Act, the term ‘‘Hurricane 

9 Katrina-affected person’’ means a person— 

10 (1) who, as of August 28, 2005, resided in a 

11 county identified as being adversely affected by Hur12 ricane Katrina in Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, or 

13 Alabama by Federal Disaster Declaration notice 

14 1602, 1603, 1604, or 1605, respectively (as amend15 ed), issued by the Federal Emergency Management 

16 Agency; or 

17 (2) whose claim is under the jurisdiction of the 

18 Department of Veterans Affairs regional office in 

19 New Orleans, Louisiana or Jackson, Mississippi. 

Æ
# DLA Distribution announces quarterly award winners

/ Published Sept. 10, 2018
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
DLA Distribution deputy commander Twila Gonzales, Senior Executive Service, has announced the organization’s third quarter, fiscal year 2018 Employee/Team of the Quarter, Military of the Quarter, Mission Impact, and Strategic Goals winners.                             

Receiving the Employee of the Quarter Award were:Edwin Galicinao, DLA Distribution San Joaquin, CaliforniaCarrie Lemelle, DLA Distribution Warner Robins, GeorgiaRebertha O'Neil, DLA Distribution Warner Robins, GeorgiaCarter Gamble, DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, TexasPamela Doyle, DLA Distribution San Diego, CaliforniaRonald Vann, DLA Distribution San Diego, CaliforniaJomar Smith, DLA Distribution EuropeCarolyn Burrow, DLA Distribution Puget Sound, WashingtonMaurizio Saia, DLA Distribution Sigonella, ItalyRodney Lambert, DLA Distribution Warner Robins, Georgia

Receiving the Team of the Quarter Award:DLA Distribution Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Box Shop Team

Receiving Military of the Quarter were:Logistics Specialist 1st Class Carolina Cline, DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan (Junior Non-Commissioned Officer of the Quarter) Sgt. 1st Class Kwesi Hackette, DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California (Senior Non-Commissioned Officer of the Quarter)Lt. Willard Trefren, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania (Company Grade Officer of the Quarter)

Receiving the Mission Impact award were:Jimmy Thomas, DLA Distribution Jacksonville, Florida, at GulfportDLA Distribution Red River, Texas, LMP Tiger TeamReceiving the DLA Distribution Strategic Goals Award were:Natalie Lee-Haynes, DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California (Warfighter First Category)Michael Maraya, DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California (Strong Partnerships Category)Joyce Uhl, DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California (Whole of Government Category)Warehousing Division, DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan (Global Posture Category)Aileen Stewart, DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California (Always Accountable Category)Arthur Gallegos, DLA Distribution San Joaquin, California (People and Culture Category)

“Congratulations to all of these outstanding employees.  Your exceptional performance and dedication to excellence make you more than deserving of these awards,” said Gonzales.
#### Willis TAYLOR v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50275.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 22, 1978.

Willis Taylor, pro se.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Karen A. Gilfoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appel-lee.

WALKER, Justice for the Court.

Pro se petition for appeal denied with leave to amend.

PATTERSON, C. J., INZER and SMITH, P. JJ., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, BROOM, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2019228DE.01016401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.9.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 228/164 |

---

Berichtigung der Regelung Nr. 51 der Wirtschaftskommission der Vereinten Nationen für Europa (UNECE) — Einheitliche Bedingungen für die Genehmigung der Kraftfahrzeuge mit mindestens vier Rädern hinsichtlich ihrer Geräuschemissionen [2018/798]

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 138 vom 4. Juni 2018](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2018_138_R_TOC)
)

Seite 17, Absatz 11.3.3:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „11.3.3. | Vertragsparteien, die diese Regelung anwenden, verweigern bis zum 30. Juni 2022 im Fall von anderen Fahrzeugtypen als solchen der Klasse N2 und bis zum 30. Juni 2023 im Fall von Fahrzeugtypen der Klasse N2 nationale oder regionale Typgenehmigungen für ein Fahrzeug, das gemäß der Phase 1 (siehe Absatz 6.2.2) oder nach der Änderungsserie 02 zu dieser Regelung typgenehmigt wurde.“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „11.3.3. | Keine Vertragspartei, die diese Regelung anwendet, darf bis zum 30. Juni 2022 im Fall von anderen Fahrzeugtypen als solchen der Klasse N2 und bis zum 30. Juni 2023 im Fall von Fahrzeugtypen der Klasse N2 nationale oder regionale Typgenehmigungen für ein Fahrzeug, das gemäß der Phase 1 (siehe Absatz 6.2.2) oder nach der Änderungsserie 02 zu dieser Regelung typgenehmigt wurde, verweigern.“ |

---