alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1886

AN ACT

To authorize the transfer of naval vessels to certain foreign

recipients.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Naval Vessels Transfer

5 Act of 2005’’.
 †

2

S 1886 ES

1 SEC. 2. TRANSFERS BY GRANT.

2 The President is authorized to transfer vessels to for3 eign recipients on a grant basis under section 516 of the

4 Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j), as fol5 lows:

6 (1) GREECE.—To the Government of Greece,

7 the OSPREY class minehunter coastal ship PELI8 CAN (MHC–53).

9 (2) EGYPT.—To the Government of Egypt, the

10 OSPREY class minehunter coastal ships CAR11 DINAL (MHC–60) and RAVEN (MHC–61).

12 (3) PAKISTAN.—To the Government of Paki13 stan, the SPRUANCE class destroyer ship

14 FLETCHER (DD–992).

15 (4) TURKEY.—To the Government of Turkey,

16 the SPRUANCE class destroyer ship CUSHING

17 (DD–985).

18 SEC. 3. TRANSFERS BY SALE.

19 The President is authorized to transfer vessels to for20 eign recipients on a sale basis under section 21 of the

21 Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2761), as follows:

22 (1) INDIA.—To the Government of India, the

23 AUSTIN class amphibious transport dock ship

24 TRENTON (LPD–14).
†

3

S 1886 ES

1 (2) GREECE.—To the Government of Greece,

2 the OSPREY class minehunter coastal ship HERON

3 (MHC–52).

4 (3) TURKEY.—To the Government of Turkey,

5 the SPRUANCE class destroyer ship O’BANNON

6 (DD–987).

7 SEC. 4. GRANTS NOT COUNTED IN ANNUAL TOTAL OF

8 TRANSFERRED EXCESS DEFENSE ARTICLES.

9 The value of a vessel transferred to another country

10 on a grant basis pursuant to authority provided by section

11 2 shall not be counted against the aggregate value of ex12 cess defense articles transferred to countries in any fiscal

13 year under section 516 of the Foreign Assistance Act of

14 1961.

15 SEC. 5. COSTS OF CERTAIN TRANSFERS.

16 Notwithstanding section 516(e)(1) of the Foreign As17 sistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j(e)(1)), any expense

18 incurred by the United States in connection with a trans19 fer authorized under section 2 shall be charged to the re20 cipient.

21 SEC. 6. REPAIR AND REFURBISHMENT IN UNITED STATES

22 SHIPYARDS.

23 To the maximum extent practicable, the President

24 shall require, as a condition of the transfer of a vessel

25 under this section, that the country to which the vessel
†

4

S 1886 ES

1 is transferred have such repair or refurbishment of the

2 vessel as is needed before the vessel joins the naval forces

3 of that country be performed at a shipyard located in the

4 United States, including a United States Navy shipyard.

5 SEC. 7. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.

6 The authority to transfer a vessel under this section

7 shall expire at the end of the 2-year period beginning on

8 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the Senate October 18, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1886

AN ACT

To authorize the transfer of naval vessels to certain

foreign recipients.
#### John S. KNOTTS and Charles Lee Wright, Jr., Appellants, v. Ralph E. LANE, for the use and benefit of Michigan Mutual Liability Insurance Company, Appellee.

No. 70-22.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 5, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
255 La. 238

#### Henry L. STONE v. I. E. MILLER and I. E. Miller and Sons, et al.

No. 50258.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1970.

In re: I. E. Miller and I. E. Miller and Sons applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Terrebonne. 227 So.2d 769.

The application is denied. The ruling complained of is correct.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsProgrammable, automated transistor test systemA programmable, automated transistor test system was built to supply experimental data on new and advanced power semiconductors. The data will be used for analytical models and by engineers in designing space and aircraft electric power systems. A pulsed power technique was used at low duty cycles in a nondestructive test to examine the dynamic switching characteristic curves of power transistors in the 500 to 1000 V, 10 to 100 A range. Data collection, manipulation, storage, and output are operator interactive but are guided and controlled by the system software.Document ID19860012284Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsTruong, L. V.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Sundburg, G. R.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1986Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2554NASA-TP-2554E-2768Meeting InformationMeeting: Symposium on Space Nuclear Power SystemsLocation: Albuquerque, NMCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 13, 1986End Date: January 16, 1986Accession Number86N21755Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-55-72Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860012284.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 31.1  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION   I, Gunther Than, certify that:    1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of View Systems, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and   5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.       Date: March 23, 2007 /s/ Gunther Than Gunther Than, Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22491]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


1997 Interim Grant Agreement to Recipient for Funds To Provide 
Civil Legal Services to Eligible Low-Income Clients in Blair County, 
Pennsylvania

AGENCY: Legal Services Corporation.

ACTION: Announcement of 1997 Interim Grant Agreements.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Legal Services Corporation (LSC or Corporation) hereby 
announces its intention to award an interim contract to provide 
economical and effective delivery of high quality civil legal services 
to eligible low-income clients in service area PA-16 for Blair County, 
Pennsylvania. The anticipated grant term is July 1, 1997 through 
December 31, 1997. The tentative grant amount is $69,812.

DATES: All comments and recommendations must be received on or before 
the close of business on September 22, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Legal Services Corporation--Competitive Grants, 750 First 
Street NE., 10th Floor, Washington, DC 20002-4250.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Merceria Ludgood, Deputy Director, 
Office of Program Operations, (202) 336-8848.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 1007(f) of the LSC Act, 
with a request for comments and recommendations within a period of 
thirty (30) days from the date of publication, LSC will award funds to 
the following organization to provide civil legal services in the 
indicated service area.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Service area                        Applicant name       
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PA-16.....................................  Southern Alleghenys Legal   
                                             Aid, Inc.                  
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date issued: August 13, 1997.
John A. Tull,
Director, Office of Program Operations.
[FR Doc. 97-22491 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                             FORM 10-K CERTIFICATION

I, S. Leslie Flegel, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Source Interlink Companies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operation and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.


April 15, 2004                           /s/ S. Leslie Flegel
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         S. Leslie Flegel
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 163 (Friday, August 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44727-44732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22392]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Cumulative Report on Rescissions and Deferrals

August 1, 1997.
    This report is submitted in fulfillment of the requirement of 
Section 1014(e) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act 
of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-344). Section 1014(e) requires a monthly report 
listing all budget authority for the current fiscal year for which, as 
of the first day of the month, a special message had been transmitted 
to Congress.
    This report gives the status, as of August 1, 1997, of ten 
rescission proposals and seven deferrals contained in three special 
messages for FY 1997. These messages were transmitted to Congress on 
December 4, 1996, and on February 10 and March 19, 1997.

Rescissions (Attachments A and C)

    As of August 1, 1997, ten rescission proposals totaling $407 
million had been transmitted to the Congress. Congress approved six of 
the Administration's rescission proposals, totaling $285 million, in 
P.L. 105-18. Attachment C shows the status of the FY 1997 rescission 
proposals.

Deferrals (Attachments B and D)

    As of August 1, 1997, $914 million in budget authority was being 
deferred from obligation. Attachment D shows the status of each 
deferral reported during FY 1997.

Information from Special Messages

    The special messages containing information on the rescission 
proposals and deferrals that are covered by this

[[Page 44728]]

cumulative report is printed in the editions of the Federal Register 
cited below:

61 FR 66172, Monday, December 16, 1996
62 FR 8045, Friday, February 21, 1997
62 FR 14478, Wednesday, March 26, 1997
Franklin D. Raines,
Director.

BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
      

[[Page 44729]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22AU97.013



[[Page 44730]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22AU97.014



[[Page 44731]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22AU97.015



[[Page 44732]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22AU97.016



[FR Doc. 97-22392 Filed 8-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-C
#### Estelle PARKER, Appellant, v. SCRIPPS-HOWARD BROADCASTING COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 2138.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 22, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
; Generated by FastSum - an extremely fast checksum utility.
; Go to www.fastsum.com to get your own copy for free.
;
7CC21462FA74356EBEBBDB0909DF5293 *BackCoverTensas River.pdf
901E143B35EFE91F43E72FC263CD0956 *FrontCoverTensas.pdf
D6C7ABBB7545AB2D40B8DC8E348FC352 *Tensas River Draft CCP.pdf
255 La. 553

#### R. L. REED, Jr., d/b/a Reed Hardware Company v. T. A. PITTMAN and A. E. Pittman, d/b/a Pittman Construction Co. and Continental Casualty Co. and Housing Authority of New Orleans.

No. 50389.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 12, 1970.

In re: R. L. Reed applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 229 So.2d 455.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 188 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize appropriations 

for fiscal years 2005 through 2011 to carry out the State Criminal 

Alien Assistance Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2005 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. KYL, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. CORNYN, Mrs. 

BOXER, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. CRAPO, Ms. CANTWELL, Mrs. 

HUTCHISON, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. ALEXANDER, and Mr. LAUTENBERG) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to authorize 

appropriations for fiscal years 2005 through 2011 to 

carry out the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Criminal Alien 

5 Assistance Program Reauthorization Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 188 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL 

2 YEARS 2005 THROUGH 2011. 

3 Section 241(i)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality 

4 Act (8 U.S.C. 1231(i)(5)) is amended by striking ‘‘appro5 priated’’ and all that follows through the period and in6 serting the following: ‘‘appropriated to carry out this sub7 section— 

8 ‘‘(A) such sums as may be necessary for 

9 fiscal year 2005; 

10 ‘‘(B) $750,000,000 for fiscal year 2006; 

11 ‘‘(C) $850,000,000 for fiscal year 2007; 

12 and 

13 ‘‘(D) $950,000,000 for each of the fiscal 

14 years 2008 through 2011.’’. 

Æ
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSRM (Solid Rocket Motor) propellant and polymer materials structural modelingThe following investigation reviews and evaluates the use of stress relaxation test data for the structural analysis of Solid Rocket Motor (SRM) propellants and other polymer materials used for liners, insulators, inhibitors, and seals. The stress relaxation data is examined and a new mathematical structural model is proposed. This model has potentially wide application to structural analysis of polymer materials and other materials generally characterized as being made of viscoelastic materials. A dynamic modulus is derived from the new model for stress relaxation modulus and is compared to the old viscoelastic model and experimental data.Document ID19880018959Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsMoore, Carleton J.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 8, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1988Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2824NASA-TP-2824Accession Number88N28343Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880018959.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Tommy H. SCOTT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1688.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 4, 1977.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Douglas A. Wallace, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

The judgment and sentence of the court, while indicating the appellant was to receive credit for all time served in jail, does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed, as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975). *Smith v. State,*310 So.2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). In addition, appellant was sentenced to confinement “at hard labor.” To be imprisoned “at hard labor” is improper because no existing state statute provides for its imposition as a sentence for any offense. *McDonald v. State,*321 So.2d 453 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

Remanded for correction of the sentence; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

GRIMES, Acting C. J., SCHEB, J., and McNULTY, JOSEPH P. (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Infinex Ventures Inc. (the "Company") on
  10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
  De Rosa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Michael De Rosa    
| | -----------------------
| | (Signature)            
| |                        
| | Chief Executive Officer
| | (Title)                

---