alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Gunther Than, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of View Systems,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.



                                    /s/ Gunther Than
Date: May 15, 2006                 ____________________________________
                                   Gunther Than, Principal Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

        Wehave issued our report dated February 23, 2005 accompanying the consolidatedfinancial statements included in the Annual Report of Image Sensing Systems, Inc. on Form10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Image SensingSystems, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-82546, effective February 11, 2002; File No.333-86169, effective August 30, 1999; and File No. 333-09289, effective July 31,1996) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-41706, effective July 19, 2000). 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

Minneapolis, Minnesota
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Tyronne SIMPSON.

No. 62264.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 2, 1978.

In re: Tyronne Simpson applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

*206Writ denied. Moot. Relator has been provided the transcript relator seeks, according to the trial judge.
# ‘You Are Not Forgotten’: Sept. 21 is National Prisoner of War/Missing in Action Recognition Day

/ Published Sept. 20, 2018

Each year on the third Friday in September, Americans honor the men and women who were prisoners of war and those still missing in action. And as this day approaches, we begin to see displayed the symbol of the nation’s respect for those individuals. 

Did you ever wonder how that black and white flag with the silhouette of a figure in profile, guard tower and barbed wire became the easily recognized symbol of respect for those missing men and women? 

The POW/MIA flag was created almost 50 years ago, at the request of family members who made up the National League of POW/MIA Families. 

In 1971, one member, Mary Hoff, the wife of a POW Navy pilot, suggested creating a flag. Hoff called Annin Flagmakers of Verona, New Jersey, for help creating the symbol. 

The flag company, one of America’s oldest, worked with the league to design and manufacture the flag. The flag is not bound by copyright and can be reproduced freely, as its designer Newton Heisley wished it to be. 

Congress and the president first recognized National POW/MIA Recognition Day in 1979, and through the early 1980s, the flag’s popularity grew. In 1982, it became the only flag other than the Stars and Stripes to fly over the White House. 

In 1989, the POW/MIA Flag was given official permission to be flown on National POW/MIA Recognition Day, along with five other national holidays, at places designated by the secretary of defense. The flag flies below, and not larger than, the United States flag as second in order of precedence.

The observance and the flags remind Americans to remember the men and women kept from their loved ones, their country and their homes — and remind Americans everywhere to rededicate themselves to the mission of returning every POW and MIA military member home. 

Each American must ensure they are not forgotten, nor their sacrifices, ever.
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.28


FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY (this “Amendment”) is made as of August 31, 2015, by and between AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL VII, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Buyer”), and KRAUS-ANDERSON, INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation (“Seller”).
WHEREAS, Buyer and Seller entered into that certain Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property, having an effective date as of August 3, 2015 (the “Agreement”), with regard to the Property, as more particularly described in the Agreement.  Buyer and Seller wish to amend the Agreement as provided herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promise contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree that the Agreement shall be amended as follows:        


		
	1.
	Due Diligence Period. Notwithstanding anything in the Agreement to the contrary or any other agreements or understandings to the contrary between Buyer and Seller, the Due Diligence Period shall expire at 11:59 P.M. ET on September 8, 2015.




		
	2.
	Legal Description. Exhibit A-1 to the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by Exhibit A-1, attached hereto and made a part hereof.




		
	3.
	Miscellaneous. Except as expressly modified hereby the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as written.  Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Agreement.  This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement, and shall become a binding agreement when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other party.  Signatures on this Amendment which are transmitted electronically shall be valid for all purposes, however any party shall deliver an original signature of this Amendment to the other party upon request.






[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first set forth above.
	
		
	BUYER:
	SELLER:

	 
	 

	American Realty Capital VII, LLC, 
a Delaware limited liability company
	KRAUS-ANDERSON, INCORPORATED, a Minnesota corporation





	By: AR Capital, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, its sole member




By:   /s/ William M. Kahane
   Name: William Kahane    
   Title:   Manager
	By:/s/ Bruce W. Engelsma
Name: Bruce W. Engelsma
Title: Chief Executive Officer


   













EXHIBIT A-1
REAL PROPERTY


Lot 2, Block 1, Woodlake Office Park, Washington County, Minnesota
Together with the non-exclusive easements for access, parking, waterline and storm sewer contained in the Amended and Restated Reciprocal Easement and Operating Agreement dated December 21, 2010, filed March 14, 2011 as Document No. 3834595.
No. 00-7321.

#### Hargrove *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
255 La. 244

#### Succession of Olan W. WILLIS v. Mariah MARTIN and Natchitoches Collections, Inc.

No. 50297.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1970.

In re: Mariah Martin and Natchitoches Collections, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Natchitoches. 228 So.2d 732.

Writ refused. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is correct.
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Commission File Nos. 33-58653, 33-30549, 33-03169, 33-49422, 333-107065, 333-107668, 333-127647, 333-134919 and 333-145886) of Hartmarx Corporation of our report dated February 8, 2008 relating to thefinancial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

February 8, 2008
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Adolor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas P.
Hess, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Thomas P. Hess                                 
|Thomas P. Hess                                     
|Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|July 30, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46777-46778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23429]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[NAFTA-01367]


California Fashions Industries, Inc. Los Angeles, California and 
NAFTA--01367A New York, New York; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for NAFTA-Transitional Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 250(a), Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title 
II, of the Trade Act of 1974 as amended (19 USC 2273) the Department of 
Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance on January 29, 1997, applicable to all workers at 
California Fashions Industries, Inc. located in Los Angeles, 
California. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
February 13, 1997 (62 FR 6806).
    At the request of the petitioners, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information received 
by the company shows that worker separations have occurred at the New 
York, New York location of California Fashions Industries, Inc. The New 
York, New York location is the showroom and sales office of California 
Fashions' production facility in Los Angeles, California. The workers 
are engaged in the production of ladies' garments.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of California Fashions Industries, Inc. who were adversely 
affected by increased imports from Mexico. Accordingly, the Department 
is amending the certification to cover the workers of California 
Fashions Industries, Inc., New York, New York.
    The amended notice applicable to NAFTA--01367 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    ``All workers of California Fashions Industries, Inc., Los 
Angeles, California

[[Page 46778]]

(NAFTA--01367), and New York, New York (NAFTA--01367A) who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after November 
26, 1995, are eligible to apply for NAFTA-TAA under Section 250 of 
the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC this 22nd day of August, 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-23429 Filed 9-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                9022
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        27788
<ALLOWANCES>                                           541
<INVENTORY>                                          24389
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     68177
<PP&E>                                               39827
<DEPRECIATION>                                       24734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      100849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                44048
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                           8492
<COMMON>                                                78
<OTHER-SE>                                           48309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        100849
<SALES>                                             114369
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    121400
<CGS>                                                57563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        50809
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (3227)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    1043
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      11069
<INCOME-TAX>                                          3498
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   7571
<DISCONTINUED>                                      (11009)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (3438)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.41)



</TABLE>
### In The C ou rt o f A p p ea ls Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________ No . 0 6- 09 -0 00 24 -C V

______________________________ J I MMI E DON A L L EN, Appe llant

V. J OHN CHARL ES HARGUS, Appellee
On Appea l from the County Court at L aw Hopkins County , Texas Trial Court No. CV38078

B e f o r e M o r r i s s , C
. J. , C a

rt e r a n d M o s e l e y , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by J ustice Carte r2 MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON J immy Don Allen, appellant, filed his notice of appea l f rom the trial court' s order

of dismissal Fe bruar y 19, 2009. The cler

k' s rec ord was filed May 27, 2009. No repor ter' s rec ord was re quested or filed. Allen' s brief w as there fore due June 26, 2009. Allen fil ed a reque st for an extension of tim e. I n that motion, counsel for plaintiff me ntioned that "[a]n offe r t o mediate has been made .
. . and Appellant respe ctfully reque sts this extension as an opportunity to pursue the mediation." I n g ranting that first motion to extend, this Court specified that should the parties de sire mediation, they should joint ly

seek a n order from this Court before July 27 , 2 00 9. No me diatio n o rd e r w a s r e qu e ste d; ins te a d, a se c on d re qu e st fo r a n e xten sio n o f t ime to file the brief

was requested, with the s ame langua g e as the reason for the extension. The Court
o v e r r u le d th a t mo ti o n f

o r e xte n s io n o f ti me . I n o u r o r d e r o v e r r u li n g th a t e xte n s io n, we informed counsel that fa ilure to file the brief on or bef ore A ug ust 25, 2009, could result in the appe al being dismiss ed for

want of pr osecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(b), (c ).3

I t is now September 15, and no br ief ha s been filed. Pursuant to Rule 42.3(b) and ( c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedur e, we dismiss this appeal for w ant of prose cution. T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(b), ( c).

J ack Ca rter J ustice Date Submitted: September 15, 2009 Date D ecide d: September 16, 2009
# L_2017114DE.01003901.xml

| 3.5.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 114/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2017

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 114/39

---

Berichtigung der Regelung Nr. 48 der Wirtschaftskommission der Vereinten Nationen für Europa (UN/ECE) — Einheitliche Bedingungen für die Genehmigung von Fahrzeugen hinsichtlich des Anbaus der Beleuchtungs- und Lichtsignaleinrichtungen [2016/1723]

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 265 vom 30. September 2016
  )

Seite 153, 6. Besondere Vorschriften, Absatz 6.2:

Anstatt:

„Scheinwerfer für Fernlicht (Regelungen Nr. 98 und 112)“

muss es heißen:

„Scheinwerfer für Abblendlicht (Regelungen Nr. 98 und 112)“

---
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Inform Worldwide Holdings, Inc., a
      Colorado corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March
      31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Report”), I, Ashvin Mascarenhas, Chairman, President and Secretary
      of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------










/s/
      Ashvin Mascarenhas


_______________________________


Ashvin
      Mascarenhas,


Chairman,
      President and Secretary





May
      18,
      2007
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-50966

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO NOEL SOLIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Texas

(W-97-CR-35-10)

 

December 7, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The district court committed no reversible error in its

handling of Brady and Jenks material. The conviction is affirmed.

The government properly concedes error in the sentence imposed

for the conviction of violating 21 U.S.C. 841(b). See Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 120 S.Ct. 2348; United States v. Meshack, 225 F.3d 556,

575 (5th Cir. 2000); and United States v. Doggett, 230 F.3d 160,

164-65 (5th Cir. 2000). The sentence is vacated and the case is
2

remanded to enable the district court to fashion a new sentence

within the boundaries set by 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(D).

 Judgment AFFIRMED. Sentence VACATED and case REMANDED.
# South Korea Ministry of Defense representatives visit DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania

/ Published July 27, 2018
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa., 
Lifecycle Management Division Representatives of the South Korea Ministry of Defense was presented the DLA Distribution command brief and given a tour of the Eastern Distribution Center in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania July 19.

The purpose of the visit was to provide an overview of operations and allow the delegation to witness DLA’s distribution processes.

During the tour, the group visited the Receiving Operations and Processing where they saw the Consolidation and Containerization Point, Mission Receipts, and Passive RF Portals.  At the Storage, Retrieval and Sortation System they learned of Mission Issues, High Rise Storage and Active System, Automated Weight and Offer System and the CCP Sortation and Consolidation.  

At Outloading Operations the group was given a brief overview of the Air Line of Communication Pallet Build Operations, and CONUS/OCONUS Surface Staging.

EDC Division Chief, John Northrop, lead the group through the warehouse, stopping at various points and answering their questions. 

“This is a great partnership opportunity,” said Northrup. “Visits like these enable us to provide an in-depth view of DLA Distribution operations and processes in an environment where our visitors can see our operations up-close while learning and discussing simultaneously.”