Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 175 / Wednesday, September 10, 1997 / Notices 47649

invoice price on all shipments of the

subject merchandise from reviewed

companies, entered, or withdrawn from

warehouse, for consumption on or after

the date of publication of the final

results of this review.

Because the URAA replaced the

general rule in favor of a country-wide

rate with a general rule in favor of

individual rates for investigated and

reviewed companies, the procedures for

establishing countervailing duty rates,

including those for non-reviewed

companies, are now essentially the same

as those in antidumping cases, except as

provided for in section 777A(e)(2)(B) of

the Act. The requested review will

normally cover only those companies

specifically named. See 19 C.F.R.

§ 355.22(a). Pursuant to 19 C.F.R.

355.22(g), for all companies for which a

review was not requested, duties must

be assessed at the cash deposit rate, and

cash deposits must continue to be

collected, at the rate previously ordered.

As such, the countervailing duty cash

deposit rate applicable to a company

can no longer change, except pursuant

to a request for a review of that

company. See Federal-Mogul

Corporation and The Torrington

Company v. United States, 822 F.Supp.

782 (CIT 1993) and Floral Trade Council

v. United States, 822 F.Supp. 766 (CIT

1993) (interpreting 19 C.F.R. 353.22(e),

the antidumping regulation on

automatic assessment, which is

identical to 19 C.F.R. 355.22(g)).

Therefore, the cash deposit rates for all

companies except those covered by this

review will be unchanged by the results

of this review.

We will instruct Customs to continue

to collect cash deposits for nonreviewed companies at the most recent

company-specific or country-wide rate

applicable to the company. Accordingly,

the cash deposit rates that will be

applied to non-reviewed companies

covered by this order are those

established in the most recently

completed administrative proceeding,

conducted pursuant to the statutory

provisions that were in effect prior to

the URAA amendments. See 1992/93

Final Results, 61 FR 28842. These rates

shall apply to all non-reviewed

companies until a review of a company

assigned these rates is requested. In

addition, for the period January 1, 1995

through December 31, 1995, the

assessment rates applicable to all nonreviewed companies covered by this

order are the cash deposit rates in effect

at the time of entry.

Public Comment

Parties to the proceeding may request

disclosure of the calculation

methodology and interested parties may

request a hearing not later than 10 days

after the date of publication of this

notice. Interested parties may submit

written arguments in case briefs on

these preliminary results within 30 days

of the date of publication. Rebuttal

briefs, limited to arguments raised in

case briefs, may be submitted seven

days after the time limit for filing the

case brief. Parties who submit argument

in this proceeding are requested to

submit with the argument (1) a

statement of the issue and (2) a brief

summary of the argument. Any hearing,

if requested, will be held seven days

after the scheduled date for submission

of rebuttal briefs. Copies of case briefs

and rebuttal briefs must be served on

interested parties in accordance with 19

C.F.R. 355.38.

Representatives of parties to the

proceeding may request disclosure of

proprietary information under

administrative protective order no later

than 10 days after the representative’s

client or employer becomes a party to

the proceeding, but in no event later

than the date the case briefs, under 19

C.F.R. 355.38, are due. The Department

will publish the final results of this

administrative review, including the

results of its analysis of issues raised in

any case or rebuttal brief or at a hearing.

This administrative review and notice

are in accordance with section 751(a)(1)

of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)).

Dated: September 2, 1997.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–23999 Filed 9–9–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C–351–062]

Pig Iron From Brazil; Determination To

Revoke Countervailing Duty Order

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of determination to

revoke countervailing duty order.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(the Department) is revoking the

countervailing duty order on pig iron

from Brazil because it is no longer of

interest to interested parties.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 10, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Russell Morris or Maria MacKay, Office

of CVD/AD Enforcement VI, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230;

telephone: (202) 482–2786.

Applicable Statute: Unless otherwise

indicated, all citations to the statute are

references to the provisions of the Tariff

Act of 1930, as amended by the Uruguay

Round Agreements Act effective January

1, 1995 (the ‘‘Act’’). In addition, unless

otherwise indicated, all citations to the

Department’s regulations are to 19 CFR

Part 355 (1996).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On April 1, 1997, the Department

published in the Federal Register (62

FR 15463) its intent to revoke the

countervailing duty order on pig iron

from Brazil ( 45 FR 23045; April 4,

1980). Additionally, as required by 19

CFR 355.25(d)(4)(ii), the Department

served, by certified mail, written notice

of its intent to revoke this

countervailing duty order on each party

listed on its most current service list.

Scope of the Order

The merchandise covered by this

order is pig iron of basic, foundry,

malleable, and low phosphorous grades

from Brazil. Such merchandise is

currently classified under item numbers

7201.10.00, 7201.30.00, and 7206.10.00

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule

(HTS). The HTS item numbers are

provided for convenience and Customs

purposes. The written description

remains dispositive.

Determination To Revoke

The Department may revoke a

countervailing duty order if it concludes

that the order is no longer of interest to

interested parties. We conclude that

there is no interest in a countervailing

duty order when no interested party (as

defined in sections 355.2 (i)(3), (i)(4),

(i)(5), and (i)(6) of the Department’s

regulations) has requested an

administrative review for at least five

consecutive review periods and when

no domestic interested party objects to

the revocation (19 CFR 355.25(d)(4)(iii)).

We received no requests for

administrative review for five

consecutive review periods and no

objections to our notice of intent to

revoke the countervailing duty order.

Therefore, we have concluded that the

countervailing duty order covering pig

iron from Brazil is no longer of interest

to interested parties, and we are

revoking this countervailing duty order

in accordance with 19 CFR

355.25(d)(4)(iii).
47650 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 175 / Wednesday, September 10, 1997 / Notices

Further, as required by 19 CFR

355.25(d)(5), the Department is

terminating the suspension of

liquidation on the subject merchandise

as of the effective date of this notice,

and will instruct the Customs Service to

liquidate, without regard to

countervailing duties, all unliquidated

entries of this merchandise exported

from Brazil on or after January 1, 1997.

Dated: September 3, 1997.

Jeffrey P. Bialos,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for

Import Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–23998 Filed 9–9–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–M

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

[I.D. 082097A]

Marine Mammals; Scientific Research

Permit No. 801–1365

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),

Commerce.

ACTION: Issuance of permit.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Dr.

William A. Kuperman (Principal

Investigator), Dr. Gerald L. D’Spain and

Mr. Aaron Thode (Co-investigators),

Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps

Institution of Oceanography, 291

Rosecrans Street, San Diego, California

92106, has been issued a permit to take

marine species for purposes of scientific

research during acoustic experiments.

ADDRESSES: The permit and related

documents are available for review

upon written request or by appointment

in the following office(s):

Permits and Documentation Division,

Office of Protected Resources, NMFS,

1315 East-West Highway, Room 13130,

Silver Spring, MD 20910 (301/713–

2289); and

Regional Administrator, Southwest

Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd.,

Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802–4213

(Tel: 310–980–4001).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June

30, 1997, notice was published in the

Federal Register (62 FR 35156) that a

request for a scientific research permit

to take various species of marine

mammals and marine turtles had been

submitted by the above-named

individuals. The requested permit has

been issued under the authority of the

Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,

as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), the

Regulations Governing the Taking and

Importing of Marine Mammals (50 CFR

part 216), the Endangered Species Act of

1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531

et seq.), the regulations governing the

taking, importing, and exporting of

endangered fish and wildlife (50 CFR

parts 217–227), and the Fur Seal Act of

1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1151 et

seq.).

Issuance of this permit as required by

the ESA was based on a finding that

such permit: (1) Was applied for in good

faith; (2) will not operate to the

disadvantage of the endangered species

which is the subject of this permit; and

(3) is consistent with the purposes and

policies set forth in section 2 of the

ESA.

Dated: September 4, 1997.

Ann D. Terbush,

Chief, Permits and Documentation Division,

Office of Protected Resources, National

Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 97–23942 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–F

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Technology Administration

Technical Advisory Committee To

Develop a Federal Information

Processing Standard for the Federal

Key Management Infrastructure

AGENCY: Technology Administration,

Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal

Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.,

notice is hereby given that the Technical

Advisory Committee to Develop a

Federal Information Processing

Standard for the federal Key

Management Infrastructure will hold a

meeting on October 15–16, 1997. The

Technical Advisory Committee to

Develop a Federal Information

Processing Standard for the Federal Key

Management Infrastructure was

established by the Secretary of

Commerce to provide industry advice to

the Department on encryption key

recovery for use by federal government

agencies. All sessions will be open to

the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on

October 15–16, 1997 from 9:00 a.m. to

6:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place

at the Orlando Marriott, 8001

International Drive Orlando, FL 32819.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Edward Roback, Committee Secretary

and Designated Federal Official,

Computer Security Division, National

Institute of Standards and Technology,

Building 820 Room 426, Gaithersburg,

Maryland, 20899; telephone 301–975–

3696. Please do not call the conference

facility regarding details of this meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

1. Agenda

Opening Remarks

Chairperson’s Remarks

News Updates (Members, Federal

Liaisons, Secretariat)

Working Group (WG) Reports

Discussion

Intellectual Property Issues (as

necessary)

Public Participation

Plans for Next Meeting

Closing Remarks

Note that the items in this agenda are

tentative and subject to change due to

logistics and speaker availability.

2. Public Participation: The

Committee meeting will include a

period of time, not to exceed thirty

minutes, for oral comments from the

public. Each speaker will be limited to

five minutes. Members of the public

who are interested in speaking are asked

to contact the individual identified in

the ‘‘for further information’’ section. In

addition, written comments should be

directed to the Technical Advisory

Committee to Develop a Federal

Information Processing Standard for the

Federal Key Management Infrastructure,

Building 820, Room 426, National

Institute of Standards and Technology,

Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899. It would

be appreciated if sixty copies could be

submitted for distribution to the

Committee and other meeting attendees.

3. Additional information regarding

the Committee is available at its world

wide web homepage at: http://

csrc.nist.gov/tacdfipsfkmi/

4. Should this meeting be canceled, a

notice to that effect will be published in

the Federal Register and a similar

notice placed on the Committee’s

electronic homepage.

Dated: September 5, 1997.

Mark Bohannon,

Chief Counsel for Technology Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–23980 Filed 9–9–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–CN–M

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

Notice of Meeting

The next meeting of the Commission

of Fine Arts is scheduled for 18

September 1997 at 10:00 AM in the

Commission’s offices at the Pension

Building, Suite 312, Judiciary Square,

441 F Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

20001. The meeting will focus on a

variety of projects affecting the

appearance of the city.