alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22448]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-447-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

August 19, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 15, 1997, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing to become part of Northern's FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fifth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets 
proposed to become effective on September 15, 1997:

Third Revised Sheet No. 106
First Revised Sheet No. 107

    Northern states that the above-referenced tariff sheets amends Firm 
Throughput Services Rate Schedule TF to clarify the Shipper 
notification requirements associated with reduction rights.
    Northern states that copies of the filing were served upon 
Northern's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such petitions or protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. All 
protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for inspection in the 
Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-22448 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Amos Eiran, the Chief Executive Officer of Tissera, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter
      ended April 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated: June 24, 2005


                                       By: /s/ Amos Eiran
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name: Amos Eiran
                                           Title: Acting Chief Executive Officer
#### Maria Bruno THOMAS, Appellant, v. Paula KRAMER, a widow, Appellee.

No. 76-2293.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 15, 1977.

Donald L. Brooks and L. M. Taylor of Ryan & Taylor, North Palm Beach, for appellant.

Louisa Smith-Adam of Montgomery, Ly-tal, Reiter, Denney and Searcy, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the briefs of the parties and the appendix and find that appellant has failed to demonstrate an abuse of the wide judicial discretion with which the chancellor is vested in matters of this kind. Lane v. Clein, 137 So.2d 15 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1962); 17 Fla.Jur., *Injunction,*§ 16.

Accordingly, the order appealed from is affirmed.

CROSS, DOWNEY and DAUKSCH, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         1283
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    17807
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               19090
<PP&E>                                         41270
<DEPRECIATION>                                 14877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 331718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          186216
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       338
<OTHER-SE>                                     174563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   331717
<SALES>                                        271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               271
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               102
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (271)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (102)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (102)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (102)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.0)



</TABLE>
Exhibit  32.1
                                                                  -------------

                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                              A Nevada corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Penny
Perfect, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




         Dated: August 13, 2007                    /s/ Penny Perfect
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Its: Chief Executive Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
         other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
         signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
         this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
         retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are
         accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to section 906
         of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
         1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
         filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.














                               Exhibit 32.1 - 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1728 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1728

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
 Indian employment credit and the depreciation rules for property used 
              predominantly within an Indian reservation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 2005

  Mr. Inhofe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
 Indian employment credit and the depreciation rules for property used 
              predominantly within an Indian reservation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF INDIAN EMPLOYMENT CREDIT AND 
              DEPRECIATION RULES FOR PROPERTY ON INDIAN RESERVATIONS.

    (a) Employment Credit.--Section 45A of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to Indian employment credit) is amended by striking 
subsection (f).
    (b) Depreciation Rules.--Subsection (j) of section 168 of such Code 
(relating to property on Indian reservations) is amended by striking 
paragraph (8).
                                 <all>
```
Order entered July 12, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00344-CV

HELEN RYERSON, Appellant

V.

THE CITY OF PLANO, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 007-02111-2020

ORDER

City of Plano’s Notice of Urgent Circumstances and Request for Expedited 

Ruling on City of Plano’s Motion to Dismiss for Mootness is DENIED AS 

MOOT.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 29, 2013

NO. 03-11-00538-CV

Susan Combs, Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts,

and the Office of the Comptroller of Public Accounts, Appellant

v.

The Texas Civil Rights Project and Sarah Canright, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

VACATED AND DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION –

OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

CONCURRING OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

DISSENTING OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE having this day come on to be considered, and the Court being of the opinion that 

there was error in the order of the trial court: IT IS ACCORDINGLY considered, adjudged and 

ordered that the trial court’s order is vacated and the suit is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. It 

is FURTHER ordered that the appellee pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court 

and the court below; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

 : 4:CR-05-0058

v. : 

:

DAVID S. GREEN : (Judge Muir)

:

ORDER

June 17, 2005

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

Defendant David S. Green awaits sentencing after having pled

guilty to an information charging him with possession of less

than 5 grams of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §

844(a). A pre-sentence conference was held on May 9, 2005.

On May 10, 2005, we issued an order in which we established

a briefing schedule on the sentencing factors set forth in 28

U.S.C. § 3553(a). On May 20, 2005, Green timely filed his brief. 

The time allowed in our order of May 10, 2005, for the government

to file its brief expired on June 7, 2005. To this date the

government has not filed its brief. The purpose of this order is

to require the government to file a brief addressing the

sentencing factors set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The government shall, within 15 days after this order,

file a brief addressing the sentencing factors set

forth in 28 U.S.C. § 3553(a).

Case 4:05-cr-00058-MM Document 16 Filed 06/17/05 Page 1 of 2
2

2. Green may, within 10 days after the filing of the

government’s brief, file a brief in reply.

s/Malcolm Muir 

MUIR, U.S. District Judge

MM:ga 

Case 4:05-cr-00058-MM Document 16 Filed 06/17/05 Page 2 of 2
# InSPIRE’d mentor program participants provide 'blessings' for homeless

/ Published May 21, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 
Participants in the Industrial Hardware Success and Partnership in Reaching Excellence mentoring program assembled 150 lunch bags for the homeless May 17. 

The community outreach and team building event featured Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support employees making sandwiches and assembling lunch bags, known as “blessing bags,” with uplifting messages. The bags were delivered to a non-profit organization serving the homeless in southern New Jersey. 

“My goal was to make it unique from other mentoring programs, which is where the team building and community service projects come into play,” Joanne Anello, Industrial Hardware traditional acquisition division chief and InSPIRE co-lead, said. “This project is just a small way we can give back and hopefully brighten someone’s day.”

When Anello teamed with Chuck Zerambo, IH purchasing agent and InSPIRE co-lead, to create the program, Anello wanted to make it unique and provide an opportunity for participants to connect with each other and the community. 

One IH employee, who authored more than half of the uplifting messages, was glad to be part of the event.

“It’s a really fun and interesting way to come together,” said Alexa Janco, an IH contract specialist and InSPIRE participant. “It was a team building event, but I also got to network with other mentors and mentees and help the community.”
InSPIRE is an ongoing mentoring program open to all DLA Troop Support employees. Employees interested in participating can contact Joanne Anello or Charles “Chuck” Zerambo for information.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 1 8

- BG

- 1 346

IN RE CHARLES L. TOBIAS
2018 DD N 327
A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 4 1 7437

BEFORE: Glickman, Associate Judge, and Nebeker and Fisher,  Senior Judges.

O R D E R (FILED

— November 19, 2020)

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent by consent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction;
this court’s January 23, 2019, order suspending respondent pending resolution of
th is matter and directing hi m to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show cause or his D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g) affidavit, and it further appearing that this order was entered on March 15, 2019, but was not published as required, it is

ORDERED that Charles L. Tobias is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia nunc pro tunc to March 15, 2019. See In re Sibley

, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010); In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable

 Judge Fisher was an Associate Judge of the court on March 15, 2019 . His status changed to Senior Judge on August 23, 2020.presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to a ll cases in which the

respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit.

PER CURIAM
#### FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. Jacob LAWSON and Janet Lawson for the Use and Benefit of United States Services Automobile Association, Appellees.

No. 68-253.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

June 18, 1969.

Rehearing Denied A,ug. 11, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 12.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I, Linton W. P. Burns, certify that:

     1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Progen Industries
Limited;

     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4.     The company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

          (a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
          such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

          (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure
          controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
          about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
          of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
          evaluation; and

          (c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
          covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control
          over financial reporting; and

     5.     The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of
directors:

          (a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
          design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
          are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
          or other employees who have a significant role in the company's
          internal control over financial reporting.

Date:   December 21, 2006

                                    /s/ Linton W. P. Burns
                              ----------------------------
                              Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1621 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1621

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the above-the-
   line deduction for teacher classroom supplies and to expand such 
   deduction to include qualified professional development expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 7, 2005

Ms. Collins (for herself, Mr. Warner, and Ms. Landrieu) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the above-the-
   line deduction for teacher classroom supplies and to expand such 
   deduction to include qualified professional development expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Teacher Tax Relief Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN EXPENSES OF 
              ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (D) of section 62(a)(2) (relating to 
certain trade and business deductions of employees) is amended to read 
as follows:
                    ``(D) Certain expenses of elementary and secondary 
                school teachers.--The deductions allowed by section 162 
                which consist of expenses, not in excess of $400, paid 
                or incurred by an eligible educator--
                            ``(i) by reason of the participation of the 
                        educator in professional development courses 
                        related to the curriculum and academic subjects 
                        in which the educator provides instruction or 
                        to the students for which the educator provides 
                        instruction, and
                            ``(ii) in connection with books, supplies 
                        (other than nonathletic supplies for courses of 
                        instruction in health or physical education), 
                        computer equipment (including related software 
                        and services) and other equipment, and 
                        supplementary materials used by the eligible 
                        educator in the classroom.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```