T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. S T E P H E N L E E S E L D O N , M .D ., D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 10028 D. C . No . 2 : 0 7 - c r - 0 0 1 3 5 - KJ DL R L -1 ME MOR AN DU M *

UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. DE B OR AH MAR T I NE Z S E L DO N, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 10034 D. C . No . 2 : 0 7 - c r - 0 0 1 3 5 - KJ DL R L -2

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da K e ntJ . D a w s on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r9, 2011 S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia 

# FI LED DE C 21 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he H onor abl e W i l l i a m H . S t a f f or d, J r . , S e ni orD i s tr i c tJ udge f orthe ** U . S . D i s tr i c tC our tf

orN or the rn F l or i da , s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on.

2 B ef ore: T R O T T and B E A , C i rc ui tJudg es , and S T A F F O R D , S eni or D i stri ct Judg e. ** S tep h en S eld o n an d D eb o ra h M ar ti n ez S eld o n ap p ea l th e d istrict co u rt’s de ni a l of the i rm ot i on f

ora ne w tr i a l a f

t e rthe i rc onvi c t i ons of

f our t e e n c ount s of m a i l f r a ud, 18 U . S . C . § 1341, a nd one c ountof m i s br a ndi ng adrug, 21 U . S . C . §§ 33 1(k) and 3 33 (a )( 2). B ec ause the fa ct s a re fa m i l i art o the part i es , w e r ec i t e them he r e onl y a s ne c e s s a ry t o e xpl a i n ourde c i s i on. T he S e l dons a r gue tha tthe pr os e c ut i on vi ol a t e d B r a dy v. M a ry l a nd, 373 U . S . 83 ( 1963) , by notdi s c ove r i ng and d i sc l osi ng L i vd ahl ’ s a ff i davi tfi l ed i n a se para t e f eder al ca se i n F l ori da -- an a f f i da vi ttha tf

l a t l y c ontr a di c t e d L i vda hl ’ s t e s t i m ony a tthe tr i a l tha tthe S e l dons p u r c h a s e d o v e ra h u n d r e d v ia ls o f T R I to x o n J a n u a ry 1 3 th o r1 4 th , 2 0 0 5 . W e re vi ew de no vo a di stri ctcourt ’ s deni al of a new tri al base d o n the al l eged fai l ure of the gove rnm e ntt o c om pl y w i th i t s B r a dy obl i ga t i ons , U ni t e d S t a t e s v. R os s , 372 F. 3 d 1 0 9 7 , 1 1 0 7 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 4 ) , a n d w e a f f i rm. W e ne e d notde c i de w he the rthe a f f i da vi tw a s “ s uppr e s s e d” w i thi n the m e a n in g o f

B r a d y a n d K y le s v . W h itle y , 5 1 4 U .S . 4 1 9 ( 1 9 9 5 ) , b e c a u s e th e a f f id a v it i s notm at er i al ; thati s, there i s no “ re as on abl e probabi l i ty that , had the evi dence3

been di sc l osed t o the defense , the re sul tof the proceedi ng w ou l d h ave been di ff er ent . ” U ni t ed S t at es v. B agl ey , 47 3 U . S . 66 7, 68 2 (19 85 ). A l though ourr e vi e w of thi s i s s ue i s de novo, w e not e tha tthe di s tr i c tj udge c onc l ude d, a f

t e rhe a r i ng a l l of

the e vi de nc e , tha tthe a f f i da vi t“ w oul d notha ve af fe cted th e ju ry ’s v er d ict. ” A lth o u g h w e d o n o t acc o rd d ef er en ce to th e c o u rt’s j udgm e nt , w e do noti gnor e i te i the r . A s the di s tr i c tc our tobs e rve d, L i vda hl adm i tt ed on the st and thathe had com m i tt ed perj ury a nd w as expect i ng som e s ort o f b e n e f it f r o m th e g o v e rn m e n t a s a r e s u lt o f h is te s tim o n y a g a in s t th e S e ld o n s . T he di stri ctcourtal so prop er l y i nstruct ed the j ury thatthey s ho ul d b e m ore c ri t i ca l o f L iv d a h l’s te s tim o n y th a n th a t o f o th e rw itn e s s e s . M or e ove r , L i vda hl ’ s br othe rt e s t i f i e d tha the a nd L i vda hl a l t e r e d the S el do ns’ com pu t erre cords t o cov erup thei r use of T R It ox , and a softw ar e e ng i neer confi rm ed thatov er1, 00 0 rec ords had b ee n al t er ed. E l i zabeth L on g t es t i fi ed that D r . S e l don t ol d ar oom f ul l of s e m i na ra tt e nde e s tha tbe c a us e T R I t ox c oul d be di l ut e d w i th 10 c c s “ ve r s us the 2 t o 3” c c s w i th B ot ox® , “ he w a s abl e t o c ha r ge the s a m e a nd a c tua l l y ha ve m or e pr oduc t- - m or e m e di c a t i on tha n y ou w oul d w i th the re gu l arB ot ox . ” S he al so sa w hi m i nj ec tT R It ox i nt o a vo l un t ee r, re fut i ng D r. S e ld o n ’s te s tim o n y th a t h e u s e d T R I to x o n ly o n h im s e lf .4

F i na l l y , the a f

f i da vi t ’ s s t a t e m e nttha tL i vda hl ha d nots ol d a ny T R I t ox dur i ng the r e l e va ntt i m e pe r i od i s nota “ ‘ ne w a nd di f f e r e ntgr ound of i m pe a c hm e nt . ’ ” B a rke rv. F l e m i ng, 423 F . 3d 1085, 1097 ( 9th C i r . 2005) ( quot i ng S ilv a v . B r o w n , 4 1 6 F .3 d 9 8 0 , 9 8 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) ) . L iv d a h l’s p r o f f e ro f g u ilty p le a f ile d in th e F lo r id ac a s e , ab o u t w h ic h L iv d a h l w a s c r o s s - e x a m in e d a t tr ia l, co n t ai n ed a si m i l ar st at em en t-- th atth e co n sp i racy t o sel l T R It o x en d ed a few d ays b e f o r e th e a lle g e d s e c r e t s a le . AF F I R ME D.