alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


NAME                                                     STATE OF ORGANIZATION
----                                                     ---------------------

US Oncology Corporate, Inc.                                    Delaware
AOR Real Estate, Inc.                                          Delaware
RMCC Cancer Center, Inc.                                       Delaware
AOR Management Company of Indiana, Inc.                        Delaware
AOR Holding Company of Indiana, Inc.                           Delaware
AOR of Indiana Management Partnership                          Indiana
AOR Management Company of Oregon, Inc.                         Delaware
AOR Management Company of Missouri, Inc.                       Delaware
AOR Management Company of Arizona, Inc.                        Delaware
AOR Management Company of Oklahoma, Inc.                       Delaware
AOR Management Company of South Carolina, Inc.                 Delaware
AOR Management Company of Pennsylvania, Inc.                   Delaware
AOR Management Company of North Carolina, Inc.                 Delaware
AOR Management Company of Virginia, Inc.                       Delaware
AOR Management Company of New York, Inc.                       Delaware
AOR Management Company of Florida, Inc.                        Delaware
AOR Management Company of Nevada, Inc.                         Delaware
AOR Management Company of Texas, Inc.                          Delaware
AOR Management Company of Ohio, Inc.                           Delaware
AOR Management Company of Kansas, Inc.                         Delaware
AOR Management Company of Central Florida, Inc.                Delaware
AORT Holding Company, Inc.                                     Delaware
AOR of Texas Management Limited Partnership                    Texas
AORIP, Inc.                                                    Delaware
AOR Synthetic Real Estate, Inc.                                Delaware
Greenville Radiation Care, Inc.                                Delaware
Physician Reliance Network, Inc.                               Texas
TOPS Pharmacy Services, Inc.                                   Texas
US Oncology Research, Inc.                                     Texas
Physician Reliance Holdings, LLC                               Delaware
PRN Physician Reliance, LLC                                    Texas
Physician Reliance, L.P.                                       Texas
AOR Management Company of Alabama, Inc.                        Delaware
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Oscar NILSSON.

No. 61689.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 1978.

Thomas W. Mull, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-*187nick, Dist. Atty., Lindsay Larson, III, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit  32.2
                                                                  -------------

                                 ALPHATRADE.COM
                              A Nevada corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AlphaTrade.com. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Katharine Johnston, Principal Accounting Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




         Dated: March 19, 2009                   /s/  Katharine Johnston
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Its: Principal Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q-A or as a separate disclosure document.














                             Exhibit  32.2 - 1 - (26)
571 S.E.2d 306

#### Vahid MOHAJER, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.

Record No. 1957-00-4.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

Nov. 5, 2002.

■ Before FITZPATRICK, C.J., BENTON, ELDER, ANNUNZIATA, BUMGARDNER, FRANK, HUMPHREYS, CLEMENTS, AGEE, FELTON and KELSEY, JJ.

*134UPON A PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

On October 2, 2002 came the appellant, by court-appointed counsel, and filed a petition praying that the Court set aside the judgment rendered herein on September 17, 2002, and grant a rehearing *en banc*thereof.

On consideration whereof, the petition for rehearing *en banc*is granted, the mandate entered herein on September 17, 2002 is stayed pending the decision of the Court *en banc,*and the appeal is reinstated on the docket of this Court.

The parties shall file briefs in compliance with Rule 5A:35. The appellant shall attach as an addendum to the opening brief upon rehearing *en banc*a copy of the opinion previously rendered by the Court in this matter. It is further ordered that the appellant shall file with the clerk of this Court twelve additional copies of the appendix previously filed in this case.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7599

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TERRENCE ARNEZ DANIELS, a/k/a Tee, a/k/a Heck,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District 

Judge. (5:01-cr-00736-CMC-2)

Submitted: March 29, 2012 Decided: April 3, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrence Arnez Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes,

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Terrence Arnez Daniels appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Daniels, 

No. 5:01-cr-00736-CMC-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 21, 2011). We deny 

Daniels’ motion to seal the opinion and for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TERRANCE BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-3104

[April 17, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael A. Usan and Dennis Bailey, Judges; L.T. Case 

No. 17012947CF10A. 

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly Tollett 

Acuña, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Garcia v. State, 308 So. 3d 1031 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

WARNER, CONNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

                      AMERICAN RADIO SYSTEMS CORPORATION

                                  EXHIBIT 23

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-08601 on Form S-3/S-8, 333-25075 on Form S-8, and 333-46025 on Form S-4 of
our report dated March 6, 1998 (except for Note 3 as to which the date is
March 27, 1998), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Radio
Systems Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1997.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 1998
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of SITEL Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jorge A. Celaya, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|               |  | /s/ Jorge A. CelayaJorge A. Celaya
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|-------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|March 12, 2004 |  |                                                                                         |  | 

---

QuickLinks
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2016

- 3692 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2016

- NE

- 05

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into an d then out of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

co st

(@$8 5 /h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection 60.0 $ 5,100.0

0 $ 5,100.00 

### 0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.0 0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products i n compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Con dition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be us ed to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specif ic requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1792 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1792

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 205 West Washington Street in Knox, Indiana, as the ``Grant W. Green 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2005

  Mr. Lugar (for himself and Mr. Bayh) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 205 West Washington Street in Knox, Indiana, as the ``Grant W. Green 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GRANT W. GREEN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 205 West Washington Street in Knox, Indiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Grant W. Green Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Grant W. 
Green Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Michael Offerman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Form 10-QSB of IEH Corporation.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, is made known to me by
         others within the company, particularly during the period in which this
         quarterly report is being prepared; and

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) Presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

         a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls.

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 6, 2007

/s/ Michael Offerman
--------------------
Michael Offerman
President (Principal Executive Officer)


                                       30
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47675-47676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23893]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Meeting of the National Advisory Child Health and Human Development 
Council and Its Subcommittee on Planning and Policy

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the National Advisory Child Health and Human Development 
Council on September 22-23, 1997. The meeting will be held in Building 
31, Conference Room 10, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 
Maryland. The Subcommittee on Planning and Policy will be held on 
September 22, 1997, in Building 31, Room 2A03, from 8:00 a.m. to 9:30 
a.m. The Subcommittee meeting will be open to the public and the agenda 
includes program plans and the agenda for the next Council meeting. 
Attendance by the public will be limited to space available.
    The Council meeting will be open to the public in September 22 from 
10:00 a.m. until 5:30 p.m. The agenda includes reports by the Director, 
NICHD, and the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, a 
presentation by the Scientific Director, NICHD, and other business of 
the Council. The meeting will be open on September 23 upon completion 
of the review of applications at approximately 1:00 p.m. to adjournment 
if any policy issues are raised which need further discussion.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 522b(c)(4) 
and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, United States Code and section 10(d) of Public 
Law 92-463, the meeting of the full Council will be closed to the 
public on September 23

[[Page 47676]]

from 8:00 a.m. to approximately 1:00 p.m. for the review, discussion, 
and evaluation of individual grant applications. These applications and 
the discussions could reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the applications, the disclosure 
of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal 
privacy.
    Ms. Mary Plummer, Executive Secretary, NACHHD Council, 6100 
Executive Boulevard, Room 5E03, National Institutes of Health, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7510, Area Code 301, 594-7232, will provide a 
summary of the meeting and a roster of Council members as well as 
substantive program information. Individuals who plan to attend the 
open session and need special assistance, such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Ms. 
Plummer.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. [93.864, 
Population Research, and 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children], 
National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: September 4, 1997.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-23893 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Edward James ARMSTEAD, Jr. v. C. Paul PHELPS, Secretary, Col. H. D. Byargeon, Secretary Supervisor, Maj. W. R. Honeycutt, Sr., Security Supervisor, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 62204.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 2, 1978.

In re: Edward James Armstead, Jr., applying for writs of certiorari and mandamus. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ granted. The trial judge is ordered to review the. applicant’s last administrative hearing.

DENNIS, J.,

is of the view that this application should be considered as petition for habeas corpus and that an evidentiary hearing should be ordered.
256 La. 267

#### Bernice DOBBS v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY et al.

No. 50640.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Bernice Dobbs applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

SUMMERS, J., is recused.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47481-47482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23767]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER97-3931-000]


PPM Six LLC; Notice of Filing

September 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on July 25, 1997, PPM Six LLC tendered for filing 
FERC Rate Schedule No. 1 in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions or 
protests should be filed on or before September 15, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies

[[Page 47482]]

of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23767 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M