alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RO 12577 

PPC 9487.1986(03) 

GASEOUS EMISSIONS FROM LANDFILLS 

OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE 

MAR 6 1986 

Mr. H. Lanier Hickman, Jr. 

Executive Director 

Governmental Refuse Collection 

 and Disposal Association 

P.O. Box 7219 

Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 

Dear Mr. Hickman: 

This is in reply to your letter to me dated December 5, 

1985, in which you requested a clarification of how we intend to 

regulate gaseous emissions from landfills. In particular, you 

asked us to consider regulating gaseous emissions from hazardous 

and non-hazardous waste landfills through the Clean Air Act (CAA) 

rather than the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). 

As we stated in the recently promulgated regulations on the 

burning and blending of hazardous waste (40 CFR Section 266.30), 

we believe it is clear that the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) has the authority under both Sections 3004(n) and 

4004(a) of RCRA, as well as the CAA, to regulate gaseous emissions from hazardous and non-hazardous waste landfills. The 

lead EPA office for developing air emission standards is the 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS). Because 

OAQPS is only in the early stages of development of policies 

and rules pertaining to gaseous emissions from hazardous waste 

land disposal facilities, it is too early to provide you with 

anything definitive on this subject at this time. In addition, 

no decisions have been made regarding any revisions to the landfill gas provisions of the "Criteria for Classification of Solid 

Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices" (40 CFR Part 257). We 

will be developing regulatory options for the Criteria revisions 

during the next several months. 

Because the GRCDA Landfill Gas Committee is already working 

with the EPA Subtitle D program on similar issues, it may be 

appropriate to discuss this issue at the meeting planned for 

March 17, 1986, in Newport Beach, California. I have asked 

Allen Geswein of my staff to work with OAQPS to put this issue 

on the agenda for this meeting. 
RO 12577 

-2- 

I hope that this information is helpful to you and expect 

that through a coordinated effort we can develop an appropriate 

approach for dealing with gaseous emissions from non-hazardous 

waste land disposal facilities. If you have any specific 

questions on the development of the air emission standards 

for hazardous waste land disposal facilities, please contact 

Susan Thorneloe or Randy McDonald of OAQPS. Both can be reached 

at (919) 541-5671. Or, contact James Berlow of OSW at (202) 

382-7917. 

Sincerely yours, 

Marcia E. Williams 

Director 

Office of Solid Waste 

cc: Susan Thorneloe (OAQPS) 

 Randy McDonald (OAQPS)
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the annual report of Ever-Glory International Group, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kang Yihua, Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify
      as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
      Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
      knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.




Date:
                March 11, 2008
            
            /s/
                Kang YihuaKang
                YihuaChief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[110th Congress Public Law 418]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ418.110]

[[Page 122 STAT. 4772]]

Public Law 110-418
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate a portion of the Rappahannock River in the Commonwealth of 
Virginia as the ``John W. Warner Rapids''. <<NOTE: Oct. 14, 2008 -  [S. 
                                3550]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JOHN W. WARNER RAPIDS, FREDERICKSBURG, VIRGINIA.

    (a) Designation.--The portion of the Rappahannock River comprised of 
the manmade rapids located at the site of the former Embrey Dam in 
Fredericksburg, Virginia, and centered at the coordinates of N. 38.3225 
latitude, W. 077.4900 longitude, shall be known and designated as the 
``John W. Warner Rapids''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the portion of the 
Rappahannock River referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the John W. Warner Rapids.

    Approved October 14, 2008.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3550:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 154 (2008):
            Sept. 24, considered and passed Senate.
            Sept. 29, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DONALD LITMAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 241 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CELIA LITMAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 242 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CELIA LITMAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 243 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v. :

:

:

:

:

: No. 244 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court[ 241 MAL 2022, 242 MAL 2022, 243 MAL 2022 and 244 MAL 2022 ]

- 2

DONALD LITMAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of November, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 31.1

              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Gunther Than, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of View Systems,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.



                                  /s/ Gunther Than
Date: May 15, 2006                ____________________________________
                                  Gunther Than, Chief Executive Officer
# Επίσημη Εφημερίδα C 83I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0901 |
| --- | --- |
| Επίσημη Εφημερίδα
  της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | C 083I |
| | |
| Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα | Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες | 64ό έτος12 Μαρτίου 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0901

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα

της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

C 083I

Έκδοση στην ελληνική γλώσσα

Ανακοινώσεις και Πληροφορίες

64ό έτος12 Μαρτίου 2021

---

| Περιεχόμενα | Σελίδα |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Πληροφορίες |
| | ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ ΠΡΟΕΡΧΟΜΕΝΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΚΡΑΤΗ ΜΕΛΗ |
| 2021/C 83 I/01 | Πληροφοριες που διαβιβαζουν τα κρατη μελη οσον αφορα την απαγορευση αλιειας | 1 |

Περιεχόμενα

Σελίδα

IV   Πληροφορίες

ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ ΠΡΟΕΡΧΟΜΕΝΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΚΡΑΤΗ ΜΕΛΗ

2021/C 83 I/01

Πληροφοριες που διαβιβαζουν τα κρατη μελη οσον αφορα την απαγορευση αλιειας

1

---

| EL | |
| --- | --- |

EL

---

IV Πληροφορίες

ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ ΠΡΟΕΡΧΟΜΕΝΕΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΑ ΚΡΑΤΗ ΜΕΛΗ

| 12.3.2021 | EL | Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης | CI 83/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2021

EL

Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης

CI 83/1

---

Πληροφοριες που διαβιβαζουν τα κρατη μελη οσον αφορα την απαγορευση αλιειας

(2021/C 83 I/01)

Σύμφωνα με το άρθρο 35 παράγραφος 3 του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 1224/2009 του Συμβουλίου, της 20ής Νοεμβρίου 2009, περί θεσπίσεως ενωσιακού συστήματος ελέγχου της τήρησης των κανόνων της κοινής αλιευτικής πολιτικής (1), αποφασίστηκε η απαγόρευση αλιείας όπως εμφαίνεται στον ακόλουθο πίνακα:

| Ημερομηνία και ώρα απαγόρευσης | 24.12.2020 |
| --- | --- |
| Διάρκεια | Από 24.12.2020 έως 31.12.2020 |
| Κράτος μέλος | Πορτογαλία |
| Απόθεμα ή ομάδα αποθεμάτων | ALB/AN05N |
| Είδος | Μακρόπτερος τόνος βορείου αποθέματος (Thunnus alalunga) |
| Ζώνη | Ατλαντικός Ωκεανός, βορείως των 5° Β |
| Τύπος/-οι αλιευτικών σκαφών | --- |
| Αριθμός αναφοράς | 40/TQ123 |

Ημερομηνία και ώρα απαγόρευσης

24.12.2020

Διάρκεια

Από 24.12.2020 έως 31.12.2020

Κράτος μέλος

Πορτογαλία

Απόθεμα ή ομάδα αποθεμάτων

ALB/AN05N

Είδος

Μακρόπτερος τόνος βορείου αποθέματος (Thunnus alalunga)

Ζώνη

Ατλαντικός Ωκεανός, βορείως των 5° Β

Τύπος/-οι αλιευτικών σκαφών

---

Αριθμός αναφοράς

40/TQ123

---

(1)  ΕΕ L 343 της 22.12.2009, σ. 1.

---
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1657

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-acetylnicotinic acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2005

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-acetylnicotinic acid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-ACETYLNICOTINIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.06.03 2-Acetylnicotinic acid (CAS 

No. 89942–59–6) (provided 

for in subheading 

2933.39.61) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 
2

•S 1657 IS 

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Holocaust survivor shares his devastating past with hope for the human spirit
 
  By Beth Reece
                                                        In 1950, the family was finally granted visas to Palestine. Shaffir moved to the United States in 1961. Eight years later he started his own business and one year after that he married his wife, Merryl, in Atlanta, Georgia. They have five children and 12 grandchildren, all of them named after family members lost during the Holocaust.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. CHERIE ROER,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 22

- 10175
D.C. No. 1:18

- cr - 00084

- LEK

- 2

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 14, 2023 * *
Before: SILVERMAN, SUNG, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. Cherie Roer appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges two conditions of supervised release imposed following her guilty

- plea conviction for drug offenses . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

. We review for plain

error, see United States v. Wolf Child , 699 F.3d 1082, 1089 (9th Cir. 2012), and w e

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 21 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 10175

affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.
Roer first challenges the special condition requiring her to participate in a
mental health assessment . Although Roer has made commen dable rehabilitative
efforts , it is apparent that the district court adopted probation’s recommendation to impose the challenged condition in light of Roer’s history of mental health issues

. See id. at 1090 (district court need not state its reasons for i mposing a supervised
released condition when the reasoning is apparent from the record). Moreover , t he
condition is proper because it is reasonably related to her rehabilitation and does not involve a greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary. See 18 U.S.C. § 35 83 (d) ; United States v. Rearden , 349 F.3d 608, 618 (9th Cir. 20 0 3)

. Roer also challenges standard condition eight, which prohibits Roer from interacting with known felons without prior approval, because it implicates her right to associate with her husband

. As the government concedes, the district court plainly erred by failing to explain its reasons for imposing this condition

. See Wolf
Child , 699 F.3d at 1090

- 92 ( d escribing enhanced procedural requirements the court must follow when imposing a condition that restricts a defendant’s particularly significant liberty interest in familial association )

. Accordingly, we vacate the
condition and remand for the court to exempt Roer’s husband or make the requisite findings as why it should apply to him

. See id . at 1103

. AFFIRMED in part; VACATED in part ; and REMANDED
.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of World Health Energy Holdings, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: November 12, 2010
 
 By:
/s/ David LiebermanDavid LiebermanChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alternate Energy Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-QSB"), I,
Blaine Froats Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 11, 2004

By: /s/ Blaine Froats
----------------------
Blaine Froats
Chief Executive Officer
#### TRADER JACK OF LAUDERDALE-BY-THE-SEA, INC., Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED PROGRAM PUBLISHERS, INC., Appellee.

No. 69-679.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Dec. 3, 1969.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; James M. Reasbeck, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, James Clark, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mind2Market, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of March 31, 2004; and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 24, 2004

/s/ James Clark
- -----------------------
James Clark, CEO
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.1 Summary of Employment Agreements
September 30, 2004 Length of Severance PeriodEmployee
    
    Title
    
    Termination
    
    Change of ControlBahram Akradi
    
    CEO
    
    NA
    
    NAMike Gerend
    
    EVP
    
    18 mos.
    
    21 mosMike Robinson
    
    EVP
    
    18 mos.
    
    21 mosSteve Rowland
    
    Pres
    
    18 mos.
    
    21 mosMike Brown
    
    SVP
    
    18 mos.
    
    12 mos.Eric Buss
    
    SVP
    
    18 mos.
    
    12 mos.Mark Zaebst
    
    SVP
    
    18 mos.
    
    12 mos.Jeff Zwiefel
    
    SVP
    
    18 mos.
    
    12 mos.
 Non-compete term of 18 months across all employees in the event of a
Termination situation and 24 months across all employees in the event of a
Change of Control situation.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6722

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM CHARLES DOUGAL-MEDINA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-173-BR; CA-99-124-5-BR) Submitted: September 29, 2005 Decided: October 7, 2005 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Charles Dougal-Medina, Appellant Pro Se. David J. Cortes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: William Charles Dougal-Medina seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion under Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to correct his sentence. Although we grant leave to proceed informa pauperis, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. In a criminal case, a notice of appeal may be filed within ten days after the entry of the final order. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1). That appeal period may be extended for a maximum of thirty days upon a showing of good cause or excusable neglect. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4). The appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 13, 2003. Giving Dougal-Medina the benefit of Fed. R. App. P. 4(c), the notice of appeal is deemed filed on April 16, 2005. Because Dougal-Medina failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED