alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ohio and Pennsylvania Railroad Company *versus*Bradford’s heirs.

This Court will not take notice of evidence given to viewers appointed to assess the damage done by the location and construction of a railroad through the lands of an individual. Such evidence is not a part of the record.

Error to the Common Pleas of *Allegheny county.*

The Ohio' and Pennsylvania Railroad Company, having run their railroad through the land of the heirs of Thomas Bradford, in pursuance of the 9th section of the act regulating railroad companies, filed a description of its appropriation of a portion of the land of the said heirs, and in their petition asked the Court to appoint viewers to assess the damages, &c. On 17th June, 1850, three viewers were appointed, who reported damages to the amount of $2450. ►

On the part of the Company, exceptions to the report were filed, the three first of which were: 1. The viewers assessed exorbitant damages. 2. They assessed no benefits conferred upon the property, arising from the improvement. 3. They did not take into consideration the enhanced value of the whole tract per acre, in consequence of the improvement.

Depositions were taken on each side, but the exceptions were overruled and the report confirmed. To this error was assigned.

*Qourtney*and *Williams,*for the Company.

*JSIcQandless*and *Loomis,*contó.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Black, C. J.

All the exceptions here may be summed up in this: that the damages were not justified by the evidence. But we can take no notice of evidence given to the viewers. It is not and cannot be made a part of the record. It would be better not to put such evidence on the paper-books. When it is placed before us we will treat it, as we treat all other extraneous matter, and give it no attention.

Judgment affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00535-CR

Jason David KIMBALL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR10002

Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED September 11, 2019.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47506-47507]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23819]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY


Open Meeting, Advisory Committee for the National Urban Search 
and Rescue Response System

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App.), announcement is made of 
the following committee meeting:
    Name: Advisory Committee for the National Urban Search and Rescue 
Response System.
    Date of Meeting: September 15-16, 1997.
    Place: FEMA Mt. Weather Emergency Assistance Center, The Conference 
and Training Center, Building 430, 19844 Blue Ridge Mountain Road, 
State Route 601, Berryville, VA 20135.
    Time: September 15th: 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., September 16th: 9:00 
a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Proposed Agenda: The Committee will be provided with a program 
update that will address the status of ongoing audits and program 
reviews, functional training and program support efforts, and Fiscal 
Year 1997 through 1999 budgets for the Urban Search and Rescue Program. 
The committee will review, discuss, and develop final recommendations 
for the organization of the Advisory Committee working group structure 
and the decision making process. Other items for discussion may include 
sponsoring agency head involvement, authorizing legislation, functional 
training methodologies, and program strategic planning and budgeting.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with approximately 20 seats 
available on a first-come, first-served basis. All members of the 
public

[[Page 47507]]

interested in attending should contact Mark R. Russo, at 202-646-2701.
    Minutes of the meeting will be prepared and will be available for 
public viewing at the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Operations 
and Planning Division, Response and Recovery Directorate, 500 C Street, 
SW, Washington, DC 20472. Copies of the minutes will be available upon 
request 30 days after the meeting.

    Dated: September 5, 1997.
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response & Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-23819 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-M
#### E. HART, Appellant, v. John S. BOLAN, Appellee.

No. L-119.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 1970.

Green, Simmons & Green, Ocala, for appellant.

Greene, Ayres, Swigert, Cluster & Tucker, Ocala, for appellee.

*163PER CURIAM.

This cause haying been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1894 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1894

 To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act to provide for 
 the making of foster care maintenance payments to private for-profit 
                               agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 19, 2005

Mr. Inhofe (for himself, Mr. Rockefeller, Ms. Landrieu, and Mr. Craig) 
 introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read 
                       the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend part E of title IV of the Social Security Act to provide for 
 the making of foster care maintenance payments to private for-profit 
                               agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Access Foster Care Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. FOSTER CARE MAINTENANCE PAYMENTS TO PRIVATE FOR-PROFIT 
              AGENCIES.

    Section 472(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 672(b)) is 
amended by striking ``nonprofit'' each place it appears.
                                 <all>
```
#### David Randall PURVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-353.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 30, 1977.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and James A. Cornelius, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

*126Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant entered a plea of nolo conten-dere to the charge of aggravated battery and was placed' on three-years probation. After a hearing in which appellant’s probation was properly revoked, he was adjudicated guilty of aggravated battery and sentenced to ten years in prison. The judgment and sentence, however, is inconsistent with the trial court’s prior finding that appellant was guilty of aggravated battery in that it reflects appellant was adjudicated guilty of aggravated assault.

Remanded for correction of the judgment and sentence to indicate appellant was adjudicated guilty of aggravated battery; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32-2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form
10-K of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund V, L.P., Series 4 (the “Partnership”) for the years ended March 31, 2013, 2012,
2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk,
Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Partnership.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/
    MELANIE R. WENK                                              | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Melanie R. Wenk                                                      | 
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.



Date: November 4, 2013
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1660 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1660

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on a certain ion exchange 
                                 resin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2005

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on a certain ion exchange 
                                 resin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ION EXCHANGE RESIN COMPRISING A COMPOLYMER OF STYRENE 
              CROSSLINKED WITH ETHENYLBENZENE, AMINO-PHOSPHONIC ACID 
              SODIUM FORM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.33 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (97-135)]


Agency Information Collection: Submission for OMB Review, Comment 
Request

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) the following 
proposal for the collection of information under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received on or before 
October 10, 1997.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Mr. Richard Kall, Code 
HK, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 
20546-0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Carmela Simonson, Office of the Chief Information Officer, (202) 
358-1223.

    Title: NASA simplified acquisition for goods and services with a 
value of $100,000 or less.
    OMB Number: 2700-0086.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Need and Uses: Information collection is required to evaluate bids 
and proposals from offerors in order to award purchase orders and to 
use bank cards for required goods and services in support of NASA's 
mission.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit, not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 177,013.
    Responses Per Respondent: 2.
    Estimated Annual Responses: 216,265.
    Estimated Hours Per Request: 30 min.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 108,132.
    Frequency of Report: On occasion.
Donald J. Andreotta,
Deputy Chief Information Officer (Operations), Office of the 
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-23989 Filed 9-9-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

79–006 

" ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 115TH CONGRESS

2d Session 

REPORT

2018

115–876 

House Calendar No. 177 

IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGATIONS RELATING TO REPRESENTATIVE PRAMILA 

JAYAPAL 

R E P O R T 

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON ETHICS 

JULY 26, 2018.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


E:\Seals\Congress.#13
(II) 

COMMITTEE ON ETHICS 

SUSAN W. BROOKS, Indiana 

Chairwoman 

KENNY MARCHANT, Texas 

LEONARD LANCE, New Jersey 

MIMI WALTERS, California 

JOHN RATCLIFFE, Texas 

THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida 

Ranking Member 

YVETTE D. CLARKE, New York 

JARED POLIS, Colorado 

ANTHONY BROWN, Maryland 

STEVE COHEN, Tennessee 

REPORT STAFF

THOMAS A. RUST, Chief Counsel/Staff Director 

BRITTNEY PESCATORE, Director of Investigations 

MEGAN H. SAVAGE, Counsel to the Chairwoman 

DANIEL J. TAYLOR, Counsel to the Ranking Member 

KATHRYN LEFERBER DONAHUE, Senior Counsel 

MOLLY N. MCCARTY, Investigator 

ANDREW KLEIMAN, Investigative Clerk 

(3) 

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, 

COMMITTEE ON ETHICS, 

Washington, DC, July 26, 2018. 

Hon. KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk, House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MS. HAAS: Pursuant to clauses 3(a)(2) and 3(b) of rule XI 

of the Rules of the House of Representatives, we herewith transmit 

the attached report, ‘‘In the Matter of Allegations Relating to Representative Pramila Jayapal.’’ 

Sincerely, 

SUSAN W. BROOKS, Chairwoman. 

THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Ranking Member. 

House Calendar No. 177 

115TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 115–876 

IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGATIONS RELATING TO 

REPRESENTATIVE PRAMILA JAYAPAL 

JULY 26, 2018.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mrs. BROOKS of Indiana, from the Committee on Ethics, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

In accordance with Rule 18(e)(2) of the Committee on Ethics 

(Committee), the Committee hereby submits the following Report 

to the House of Representatives: 

I. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 

On July 25, 2018, the Committee convened for the purpose of 

considering the June 28, 2018, arrest of Representative Pramila 

Jayapal, for Crowding, Obstructing, or Incommoding, during a protest inside a Senate Office Building in Washington, D.C. Representative Jayapal forfeited a $50 collateral payment, whereupon 

the local court disposed of the charge. Therefore, the legal proceedings related to Representative Jayapal’s arrest are now resolved. 

The Committee voted against impanelling an investigative subcommittee in this matter. The Committee considered the scope and 

nature of the conduct described above and determined that review 

by an investigative subcommittee is not required in this matter. 

The Committee has determined to take no further action in this 

matter, and upon publication of this Report, considers the matter 

closed. 

II. STATEMENT UNDER HOUSE RULE XIII, CLAUSE 3(C) 

The Committee made no special oversight findings in this Report. 

No budget statement is submitted. No funding is authorized by any 

measure in this Report. 

Æ
Naked Brand Group Inc. - Exhibit10.65 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.65 

DESCRIPTION OF DEFERRED COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT WITH CAROLE
HOCHMAN 

On June 10, 2015, Ms. Hochman became eligible to receive her
full base salary pursuant to the terms of her Employment Agreement dated June 6,
2014 (the “Employment Agreement”), however, such base salary has not yet been
paid. Ms. Hochman has agreed to allow the Company to defer payment of such
amounts until such time as the Company closes a currently contemplated
underwritten public offering of its common stock. Such deferred and unpaid base
salary will accrue interest at a rate of 3% per annum. Upon closing of the
currently contemplated underwritten public offering, the Company has agreed to
issue Ms. Hochman shares of its common stock with a fair market value equal to,
and in lieu of, the cash amount owing for all deferred and unpaid base salary,
plus interest up to the date of settlement. Following the date of settlement,
Ms. Hochman will receive her base salary compensation in cash pursuant to the
original terms of the Employment Agreement.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Bronx Chiropractic Care, P.C., as Assignee of Esteban Almanzar and Uriel Albino, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>State Farm Insurance, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Zara Javakov, P.C. (Zara Javakov of counsel), for appellant.Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Devin P. Cohen, J.), entered December 16, 2016. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath (EUOs). By order entered December 16, 2016, the Civil Court granted defendant's motion. Plaintiff's sole argument on appeal is that defendant's motion should have been denied because plaintiff objected to defendant's EUO demands and defendant failed to establish that the demands were reasonable.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>Bronx Chiropractic Care, P.C., as Assignee of Adris Maria et al. v State Farm Ins. </i>(__ Misc 3d ___, 2019 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2017-525 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: March 22, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### Sammy Lee COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. K-343.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Aug. 26, 1969.

Sammy Lee Coleman, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record having *37been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate error, the order of the lower court hereby appealed from is affirmed. See Sammy Lee Coleman v. State, 171 So.2d 648 (Fla.App.1965).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTheoretical three-and four-axis gimbal robot wristsIn high-performance flight simulations, a four-axis gimbal system allows all possible rotations with acceptable gimbal angle rates while it avoids the so-callled 'gimbal lock' that occurs when gimbal rotational axes are colinear. In this paper, pertinent equations (including quaternions) are assembled for a hypothetical robot wrist, functionally equivalent to this four-axis gimbal system, and also for a true three-axis gimbal robot wrist. These equations are used to simulate the rotation of a robot hand by the robot wrist in response to operator rotational velocity commands to the robot hand. Near gimbal lock (wrist singularity), excessive rotational rates occur. Scaling the rates, which is necessary for the three-gimbal robot wrist to prevent rate limiting, introduces an undesirable time delay in the robot hand rotation with respect to the commanded rotation. However, the merit of the four-gimbal robot wrist is that the fourth gimbal angle keeps the robot wrist away from the singularity so that the robot hand moves exactly as commanded. It appears that in a 'worst-type' maneuver of the robot hand, the fourth gimbal angle can be defined so that none of the gimbal angle rates exceed about twice the commanded rates.Document ID19860015697Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsBarker, L. K.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Houck, J. A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1986Subject CategoryCyberneticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2564L-16042NASA-TP-2564Accession Number86N25168Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-45-21-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860015697.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# Aviation Hall of Fame nominations accepted through April 20

/ Published March 20, 2017

Nominations for Defense Logistics Agency Aviation’s annual Hall of Fame for 2017 are open through April 20. The Aviation Hall of Fame honors former employees who have made significant and enduring contributions to DLA or DLA Aviation.

To be eligible, nominees must have been separated from DLA or the DLA Aviation community for at least one year from the date of their reassignment, retirement, discharge, or death.

The DLA Aviation community is comprised of both military and civilian government employees from all DLA Aviation locations, or any DLA activity located on the Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia. 

Former employees are defined as government civilians and military (active duty and reserve components). Nominees should not be in a position to return to employment with DLA. 

Nominees must meet at least one of the following criteria:

• accomplished an enduring achievement that has life-long specific benefits to the center and Defense Logistics Agency; 

• made a specific or continuous accomplishment positively affecting a large segment of DLA Aviation’s employees, customers and/or vendors; or

• made a long-term contribution that has a lasting and positive impact on DLA Aviation’s mission and/or business practices.

Last year’s Hall of Fame inductee was Mary Studevant.

More details on the nomination criteria can be found in the Aviation Hall of Fame guidelines.

Any current or former employee can complete their nomination online or email their completed nomination to the DLA Aviation Awards Coordinator Yolanda Adams-Hall at yolanda.adams-hall@dla.mil. For more information, call Adams-Hall at (804) 279-3664.