alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Sliman receives DMSM for achievements as commander, DLA Distribution Europe 

/ Published June 28, 2018
GERMERSHEIM, Germany, 
Army Col. Zorn T. Sliman has been awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal for his numerous accomplishments while serving as commander, Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Europe from June 2016 to June 2018.

Under Sliman’s leadership, DLA Distribution Europe directly supported numerous operations in Europe, Afghanistan, and Eastern Africa, enabling DLA Distribution Europe to successfully further the DLA footprint in the EUCOM theater by providing support to Operation Atlantic Resolve and playing a vital role in the coordination of DDXX participation in Exercise Saber Strike. 

Concurrently, the distribution center supported a growing global combat support system-Army mission, which surpassed customer planned storage capacities and materials.

Army Col. Theodore B. Shinkle, commander, DLA Europe & Africa, reflected on Sliman’s accomplishments over his two-year command.

“Col. Sliman is a special leader and under his leadership, this distribution center has proven what an incredible capability that DLA provides to the combatant commanders, leading this distribution center to serve as the logistics hub for supporting Europe, Africa, and the Middle East.”

Sliman’s leadership was instrumental in moving the distribution center above 85 percent in both high-priority material release orders for all but three months.  When DLA initiated a command and control (C2) concept for overseas continental United States areas of responsibilities, Sliman meticulously guided DLA Distribution Europe in reshaping its reporting and mission strategy to ensure that both DLA Distribution Europe and DLA Europe and Africa were included in the strategic and customer interfacing.  To ensure a successful transition, DLA Distribution personnel were advised and mentored to make the transition with zero impact to customer focus while maintaining the highest quality of support to the joint warfighter, resulting in DLA Distribution Europe successfully managing a dramatic increase in the global combat support system-Army mission under Sliman’s command.  

“His accomplishments are simply outstanding!  Col. Sliman leaves DLA Distribution Europe with a legacy of innovation, continual improvement, and dedication to quality,” said Shinkle.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, William Whittle, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of General Gold Corporation, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of General Gold Corporation for the three month period ended July 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of General Gold Corporation.

Dated:  February 23, 2006

/s/ William Whittle

                                                          

William Whittle,

President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Adolor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael R.
Dougherty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael R. Dougherty             
|Michael R. Dougherty                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|August 5, 2008
# DLA Distribution Yokosuka Japan celebrates Asian-American Pacific Islander Heritage Month 

/ Published June 18, 2018
YOKOSUKA, Japan, 
The rich heritage of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders spans the world and the depths of America’s history.  Generation after generation, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders have forged a proud legacy that reflects the spirit of our Nation - a country that values the contributions of everyone that calls America home.  

Since 1992, May has been designated to recognize the personal achievements and valuable contributions to the American story by Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders.  These contributions include the cultural traditions, ancestry, native languages, and unique experiences represented among more than 56 ethnic groups (speaking over 100 languages) from Asia and the Pacific Islands who live in the United States.

The month of May was chosen in honor of the first Japanese immigration to the United States on May 7, 1843, and to mark the anniversary of the transcontinental railroad completion on May 10, 1869. The majority of the workers who laid the tracks of that nation-unifying railway were Chinese immigrants.

DLA Distribution Yokosuka, Japan, and Naval Supply Systems Command Fleet Logistics Center co-hosted the annual Asian-American Pacific Islander Heritage Month Ceremony on May 31, 2018, in recognition of the many contributions Asian-American and Pacific Islanders have made throughout history and to the U.S. Navy.

LS2 (FMF) Reymart Hombrebueno led the ceremony as emcee. He was born and raised in Philippines and moved to United States in October 2011 and enlisted into the Navy on July 18, 2012.  After basic training, he served as a medical logistician at 3D Medical Logistics Company, 3D Supply Battalion, Okinawa, Japan.  He is currently serving as Emergency Supply Operations Center material expediter at DDYJ, supporting the 5th and 7th Fleet Area of Responsibility.

During the ceremony, performances such as Tinikling, a traditional Philippine folk dance, were demonstrated to pay tribute to the generations of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders who have enriched America’s history and have been instrumental in its future success.

DDYJ provided Japanese traditional sweets, such as Matcha pudding (green tea pudding), Yokan (red bean paste jelly), Shiratama-dango (Japanese rice-flour dumplings with fruits) and barley tea, which is very popular in summer. 

Throughout the celebration, cross-cultural awareness was enhanced and harmony among all members of the workforce was promoted.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6126

JEFFREY ALAN TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-99-2102-2) Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 4, 2001Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey Alan Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jeffrey Alan Taylor appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. In the briefing order, Taylor was warned that this court would not consider issues not specifically raised in his informal brief. See 4th Cir. Local R. 34(b). Nonetheless, Taylor’s informal brief does not challenge the district court’s order, but instead addresses only the merits of his § 1983 claim. Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny Taylor’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23551]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-474-000]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

August 29, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 26, 1997, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff 
sheets, bearing a proposed effective date of September 1, 1997:

Third Revised Sheet No. 144
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 145
Second Revised Sheet No. 146A

    Columbia Gulf states that the purpose of this filing is to comply 
with the Commission's Order No. 636-C wherein the Commission 
established five years as the maximum length contract term that must be 
matched by a shipper exercising its right of first refusal. In Order 
No. 636-C, the Commission further directed pipelines to reflect this 
five-year term matching cap in their right of first refusal tariff 
provisions within 180 days from issuance of Order No. 636-C. Columbia 
Gulf states that it has revised its General Terms and Conditions 
Sections 4.1(c) (1), (4) and 4.2(d) to provide that the longest 
contract term that a shipper exercising its right of first refusal must 
match is five years.
    Columbia Gulf states that copies of its filing have been mailed to 
all firm customers, interruptible customers, and affected state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Regulations. All such interventions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. A copy of this filing is on file with the 
Commission and is available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23551 Filed 9-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Life Time
Fitness, Inc.
  /s/ Bahram AkradiBahram AkradiChairman of the Board of Directors, President and ChiefExecutive Officer/s/ Michael R. RobinsonMichael R. RobinsonExecutive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer 28
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 44912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22405]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-142; RM-8829 & RM-8873]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Woodville and St. Marks, FL

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Action in this document allots Channel 250A to Woodville, 
Florida, as that community's first local broadcast service, in response 
to a petition filed by George Roberts d/b/a Anchor Communications. The 
coordinates for Channel 250A are 30-17-56 and 84-07-40. There is a site 
restriction 11.7 kilometers (7.3 miles) east of the community. The 
counterproposal filed by St. Marks Broadcasting proposing the allotment 
of Channel 250A to St. Marks, Florida, was denied (RM-8873). With this 
action, this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective September 29, 1997. The window period for filing 
applications for Channel 250A at Woodville, Florida, will open on 
September 29, 1997, and close on October 30, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 96-142, adopted August 6, 1997, and released 
August 15, 1997. The full text of this Commission decision is available 
for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the 
Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800, facsimile (202) 857-3805.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Florida, is 
amended by adding Woodville, Channel 250A.

Federal Communications Commission.

John A. Karousos,

Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-22405 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
256 La. 268

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Donald R. LEWIS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary et al.

No. 50653.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Donald R. Lewis applying for writs of habeas corpus, mandamus and cer-tiorari.

Writs refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory or original jurisdiction.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCombustion performance and heat transfer characterization of LOX/hydrocarbon type propellants, volume 2A data base which relates candidate design variables, such as injector type, acoustic cavity configuration, chamber length, fuel film-cooling, etc., to operational characteristics such as combustion efficiency, combustion stability, carbon deposition, and chamber gas-side heat flux was generated.Document ID19840003250Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSchoenman, L.*(Aerojet Liquid Rocket Co. Sacramento, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1983Subject CategoryPropellants And FuelsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:171714REPT-15958T-1548-MA-129T-003FNASA-CR-171714Accession Number84N11318Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-15958Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840003250.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Sabine

National Wildlife Refuge

Draft

Comprehensive Conservation Plan

and Environmental Assessment

Draft

Comprehensive Conservation Plan

and Environmental Assessment

Sabine

National Wildlife Refuge

Photo by: Photo by:

WilliamVieth
Comprehensive Conservation Plans provide long-term guidance for

management decisions; set forth goals, objectives, and strategies

needed to accomplish refuge purposes; and identify the Fish and

Wildlife Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail

program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above

current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service

strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans

do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational

and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The Flowering of Man[electronic resource].**
PDF-v.1|epub-v.1|mobi-v.1
PDF-v.2|epub-v.2|mobi-v.2
 
SuDoc Number:SI 1.33:35/V.1-2

Item Number: 0921-A (online)

CGP systemNumber: 001063843
September 17, 2018
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion 

filed March 26, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00212-CV

IN RE FIRST COMMUNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

County Civil Court at Law No. 3 

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1066134

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 14, 2019, relator First Community Insurance Company filed a 

petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see 

also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the 

Honorable LaShawn Williams, presiding judge of County Civil Court at Law No. 3 

of Harris County, to grant relator’s motion for summary judgment on real party 
2 

interest’s claims and to set aside the order denying relator’s motion to compel the 

deposition of real party in interest. 

On March 19, 2019, relator filed a motion to dismiss this original proceeding 

because the parties have settled the underlying case. Relator’s requested relief in the 

petition for writ of mandamus is now moot. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Hassan, and Poissant.
No. 9486.

#### Heinze et al. *v.*Power.

(Decided May 15, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Messrs. B'eavis & Johnson,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Smith, Taft é Arter,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
256 La. 257

#### Rodney LEJEUNE and Traders and General Insurance Company v. FLASH TRUCK LINES, INC.

No. 50611.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 8, 1970.

In re: Rodney Lejeune and Traders and General Insurance Company applying for writ of certiorari. 233 So.2d 628.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction. A hearing in this Court will only further delay the trial of this case on its merits.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45945

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

FRANK L. NICOLAI, III,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: January 22, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Samuel Hoagland, District Judge. 

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion to correct illegal sentence, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Sally J. Cooley, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge and BRAILSFORD, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Frank L. Nicolai, III was found guilty of second degree kidnapping and rape, Idaho Code 

§§ 18-4503, 18-6101. The district court imposed concurrent sentences of twenty-five years 

determinate for second degree kidnapping and determinate life for rape. In 2013, Nicolai filed 

an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for correction of an illegal sentence which the district court 

denied. In 2018, Nicolai filed a second Rule 35(a) motion for correction of an illegal sentence,

based upon an alleged speedy trial violation, which the district court denied. Nicolai filed a 

motion to reconsider the denial of his second Rule 35(a) motion, and the district court 

subsequently denied the motion to reconsider. Nicolai appeals. 
2

In State v. Clements, 148 Idaho 82, 87, 218 P.3d 1143, 1148 (2009), the Idaho Supreme 

Court held that the term “illegal sentence” under Rule 35 is narrowly interpreted as a sentence 

that is illegal from the face of the record, i.e., does not involve significant questions of fact or 

require an evidentiary hearing. Rule 35 is a “narrow rule,” and because an illegal sentence may 

be corrected at any time, the authority conferred by Rule 35 should be limited to uphold the 

finality of judgments. State v. Farwell, 144 Idaho 732, 735, 170 P.3d 397, 400 (2007). Rule 35 

is not a vehicle designed to reexamine the facts underlying the case to determine whether a 

sentence is illegal; rather, the rule only applies to a narrow category of cases in which the 

sentence imposes a penalty that is simply not authorized by law or where new evidence tends to 

show that the original sentence is excessive. Clements, 148 Idaho at 87, 218 P.3d at 1148. 

The record supports the district court’s finding that Nicolai’s sentence is not illegal. 

Therefore, the district court properly denied Nicolai’s motion. Accordingly, we conclude no 

abuse of discretion has been shown and the district court’s order denying Nicolai’s Rule 35 

motion is affirmed.