alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6076
BERNARD RAY RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LARRY W. HUFFMAN, Director, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-97-747-R) Submitted: June 16, 1998 Decided: June 30, 1998 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernard Ray Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richardson v. Huffman , No. CA-97-747-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 9 and Dec. 17, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer Certification**

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) for the purpose of complyingwith Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code.

 

R. Jack DeCrane, the Chief Executive Officer and Richard J. Kaplan, theChief Financial Officer of DeCrane Holdings Co., each certifies that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

1.                                       theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act; and

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of DeCrane Holdings Co.

 

Date:                    May14, 2004

 

 
|   | /s/  R. JACK DECRANE                       |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   | R. Jack DeCrane                                 |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                         |
|   |                                            |
|   |                                            |
|   |                                            |
|   | /s/  RICHARD J. KAPLAN                     |
|   | Richard J. Kaplan                               |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of SureWestCommunications (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: February 21,  2006 | By:    | /s/ PHILIP A. GRYBAS                                                  |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |   | Philip A. Grybas,  Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to SureWest Communications and will beretained by SureWest Communications and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certificate is being furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K andshall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the
requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of CCF Holding Company (the small business issuer), hereby certifies as follows:

The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, of the small business issuer (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the small business issuer.

Dated this 31st day of March, 2006.



/s/ Mary Jo RogersMary Jo Rogers, Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned Director of Trump
Entertainment Resorts, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 its Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005, hereby constitutes and appoints Dale R. Black as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent to sign such Annual Report and to file such Annual Report and the exhibits thereto and any and all documents and amendments in
connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any national exchange or self regulatory agency and to do and perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be done in connection with the foregoing as fully as he
might or could do in person hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Dated: March 14, 2006



/s/ Donald J. Trump Donald J.
Trump Chairman of the Board/s/ Wallace B. Askins Wallace B.
Askins Director/s/ Edward H. DAlelio Edward H. DAlelio Director/s/ James J. Florio James J.
Florio Director/s/ Cezar M. Froelich Cezar M.
Froelich Director/s/ Morton E. Handel Morton E.
Handel Director/s/ Michael A. Kramer Michael A.
Kramer Director/s/ Don M. Thomas Don M. Thomas Director




---

/s/ Michael A. KramerMichael A. Kramer Director/s/ Don M. ThomasDon M. Thomas Director
Exhibit
23.1







Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No.
333-141830) on Form S-8 of Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc. of our report
dated March 25, 2010, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial
statements which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Conmed Healthcare
Management, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.
  
 
 
 Des
Moines, Iowa
 March 25,
2010
         McGladrey
& Pullen, LLP is an independent member firm of RSM
International,
 an
affiliation of separate and independent legal entities.
EXHIBIT 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of View Systems, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gunther Than, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    By:   /s/ Gunther Than  Gunther Than Chief Financial Officer   August 14, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

 

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of View Systems Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Gunther Than, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

By /s/ Gunther Than

Gunther Than

Director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

August 3, 2017
#### T. C. (Ted) WARD, Appellant, v. Charles L. GIBSON, Appellee.

No. 76-91.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 15, 1976.

Rehearing Denied July 9, 1976.

Hal H. McCaghren, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Shutts & Bowen and Xavier Suarez, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY and NATHAN, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an interlocutory appeal by the defendant, T. C. (Ted) Ward, from an order denying his motion to dismiss for insufficient process and insufficient service of process.

Charles L. Gibson, plaintiff, filed a verified complaint against Ward seeking compensatory and punitive damages allegedly owed pursuant to an oral contract. The summons directed that it be served together with a copy of the complaint, on T. C. (Ted) Ward at an address and apartment number in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, or on Allyn Gibson at the same address. When the Sheriff of Broward County was unable to serve Ward, a special process server was appointed by the court. The process server served one Allyn Gibson, Ward’s roommate, at Allyn Gibson’s leased parking space in the garage of the large hi-rise condominium apartment complex where Allyn Gibson and Ward reside. Ward filed a motion to dismiss on the ground of lack of jurisdiction because of insufficient process and service of process. The motion was denied.

Ward’s point on appeal is that service upon one other than the defendant at a place other than the defendant’s usual place of abode is not valid service on the defendant. Section 48.031, Fla.Stat., provides that,

> “Service or original process is made by delivering a copy of it to the person to be served with a copy of the complaint . or by leaving the copies at his usual place of abode with some person of the family who is 15 years of age or older and informing the person of their contents . . . ”

In our opinion, under the facts presented in this case, service was not made at the defendant’s “usual place of abode” as required by § 48.031, supra. Accordingly, the order denying the motion to dismiss is reversed.

Reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            2204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2204
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  013209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1600
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     13209
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   225
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8291)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-50180

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARIO CABELLO-GONZALEZ; 

MAURICIA CASTRO-VALENZUELA,

 DefendantsAppellants.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-99-CR-376-03

-----------------------------------------------------------

May18, 2001

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

Mario Cabello-Gonzalez and Mauricia Castro-Valenzuela appeal their convictions for

conspiring to possess with the intent to distribute methamphetamine. Each contends solely that the

evidence was insufficient to support his or her conviction. We have reviewed the record and the

briefs of the parties. Viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences to be drawn from it in the

light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, the evidence was sufficient to support both defendants’

convictions. See United 

States v. Gourley, 168 F.3d 165, 168-69 (5th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.
TS-EUTM01

Attachment #6

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 3

Environmental Release and Disposal Info rmation on the New Chemical Substance

at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Manufacture and Processing
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. LaVerne MOORE, Relator, v. Honorable A. J. HOSEMANN, Jr., Judge of the Court of Record of Brevard County, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-801.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 20, 1970.

L. B. Vocelle, Vero Beach, for relator.

David M. Porter, County Sol., Titusville, for respondent.

*173PER CURIAM.

The information filed in the Court of Record of Brevard County, Florida, upon which the suggestion for a writ of prohibition was filed by the relator, charges the relator with two counts of grand larceny under F.S. Section 811.021(1) (b), F.S.A. The relator contends that said court, which has jurisdiction only over non-capital felonies, is without jurisdiction to hear and try the matter since the statute in question constitutes a misdemeanor and not a felony in view of the penalty provisions set forth in 811.021(2) and (3).

The position of the relator is without merit and, accordingly, the rule absolute in prohibition is denied and the rule nisi issued by this court is discharged. Brown v. State, Fourth District Court of Appeal, 232 So.2d 55, opinion filed February 12, 1970.

CROSS, C. J., and REED, J., and Mac-MILLAN, HUGH, Associate Judge, concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 10.15

                               AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
                          WANDERLUST INTERACTIVE, INC.
                             1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN

                      ------------------------------------


        The following amendments were made to the Wanderlust Interactive, Inc.
1996 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), effective as of the date hereof:

1.      Section 5(b).  Section 5(b) of the Plan is deleted in its entirety.

2.      First Paragraph of Section 7(c). The first paragraph of Section 7(c) of
        the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

               "(c) Payment for Delivery of Shares. Shares which are
        subject to options shall be issued only upon receipt by the
        Company of full payment of the purchase price for the Shares as
        to which the option is exercised. The purchase price shall be
        payable by the Participant to the Company either (i) in cash,
        certified cash, bank draft or money order payable to the order of
        the Company; or (ii) at the sole discretion of the Board, through
        the delivery of Shares owned by the Participant for a period of
        not less than six months and for which the Participant has good
        title (free and clear of any liens and encumbrances) and which
        have a fair market value equal to the purchase price; or (iii) by
        a combination of cash and Shares as provided in (i) and (ii)
        above."

3. Section 7(d). Section 7(d) of the Plan is amended to read in its entirety as
follows:

               "(d) Vesting. The Board, in its sole discretion, may
        impose such vesting requirements on options granted pursuant to
        the Plan as it deems fit including, without limitation, providing
        for the immediate vesting of any option granted under the Plan in
        the event of (i) the sale of substantially all of the operating
        assets of the Company; (ii) the sale of securities of the


        Company constituting a controlling interest of the Company; or (iii) a
        consolidation or merger in which the Company is not the surviving



                                        1
<PAGE>   2

        entity."

        Except as provided herein, the Plan is in no other way modified and
shall continue in full force and affect.

        The above referenced amendments to the Plan were duly adopted by
Wanderlust Interactive, Inc.'s Board of Directors by means of an Action by
Unanimous Written Consent of Board of Directors, dated December 1, 1997.


Dated: December 1, 1997

                                            Wanderlust Interactive, Inc.



                                            By: /s/ JAY SMITH III
                                               -----------------------------
                                               Jay Smith, III,
                                               Chief Executive Officer,
                                               Chief Financial Officer and
                                               Secretary



                                        2
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


Source Interlink Companies, Inc.
St. Louis, Missouri

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement Form S-8 (No. 333-16039) of Source Interlink Companies, Inc. (the
Company) of our reports dated May 10, 2002, relating to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of the Company appearing in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended January 31, 2002.



/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
Chicago, Illinois
May 15, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22156]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, September 29, 1997.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-22156 Filed 8-18-97; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M