alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23247]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION


President's Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for 
Hispanic Americans; Meeting

AGENCY: President's Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for 
Hispanic Americans, ED.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a 
forthcoming meeting of the President's Advisory Commission on 
Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans (Commission) and 
describes the functions of the Commission. Notice of this meeting is 
required under section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
and is intended to notify the public of their opportunity to attend.

DATES AND TIMES: Monday, September 15, 1997, 1:30 p.m.-5 p.m. (est) and 
Tuesday, September 16, 1997, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. (est).

LOCATION: American Council on Education; 8th Floor Kellogg Conference 
Room, One Dupont Circle NW., Washington, DC.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:
Edmundo DeLeon, Special Assistant, White House Initiative on 
Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans (Initiative) at 202-401-
8459 (telephone), 202-401-8377 (FAX), ed__DeL<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1673797856737238717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="60050f0e2005044e070f16">[email protected]</span></a> (e-mail) or 
mail: U.S. Department of Education, 600 Independence Ave. SW., room 
2115, Washington, DC 20202-3601.

SUMMARY INFORMATION: The Commission was established under Executive 
Order 12900 (February 22, 1994) to provide the President and the 
Secretary of Education with advice on (1) the progress of Hispanic 
Americans toward achievement of the National Goals and other standards 
of educational accomplishment; (2) the development, monitoring, and 
education for Hispanic Americans; (3) ways to increase, State, county, 
private sector and community involvement in improving education; and 
(4) ways to expand and complement Federal education initiatives.
    The agenda for the Commission's two day meeting will explore the 
reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, education partnerships for 
family involvement, Federal agency outreach strategies, especially that 
of the Department of Education, and a work plan for the Fall 1997 and 
1998.
    Records are kept of Commission proceedings and are available for 
public inspection at the Initiative office, room 2115, 600 Independence 
Ave. SW., Washington, DC, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. (est).

    Dated: August 27, 1997.
Connie Jameson,
Acting Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23247 Filed 9-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 99.13

CERTIFICATION

REQUIRED
BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

Agrium Inc. (the Company) is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the
Report) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

I, Steve J. Douglas, Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 3, 2016



/S/ STEVE J. DOUGLASName:

Steve J. DouglasTitle:

Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
#### Norah DORSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2432.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1970.

Robert G. Ferrell, III, Public Defender, and Joe M. Mitchell, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Cocoa, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and J. Terrell Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no harmful error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT13**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers ofProgen Pharmaceuticals Limited, a company organized under the laws of the Stateof Queensland, Australia (the “Company”), does hereby certify to such officer’sknowledge that:

 

The Annual Reporton Form 20-F for the year ended June 30, 2008 (the “Form 20-F”)of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information containedin the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toProgen Pharmaceuticals Limited and will be retained by Progen PharmaceuticalsLimited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

 
| Dated:  December 22, 2009 |   | /s/ John  Chiplin                                 |
|-------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                |   | Chief Executive Officer                           |
|                                |   |                                              |
|                                |   | /s/ Paul G.E.J Dixon                              |
| Dated:  December 22, 2009 |   | General Manager of Finance  and Company Secretary |

 

----
### Pre-Tertiary stratigraphy and Upper Triassic paleontology of the Union district, Shoshone Mountains, Nevada

By: Norman J. Silberling

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp322

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EXHIBIT 10.1


	 






 


August 10,
2015


 


Mr. John Poss 

505 Dallas St.


New Braunfels,
TX 78130


 


RE:
Offer of Employment


 


Dear Poss,


 


The
purpose of this letter is confirm our agreement that Growblox Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”)
will employ you as Chief Financial Officer on the following terms and conditions.


 


The
term of your employment shall be one year from the date hereof and shall continue from year-to-year unless either of us chooses
to terminate. In the event that the Company chooses to terminate your employment, it may
do so at any time, however you will be entitled to a three month severance if this agreement is terminated during the first year
of your employment, a four month severance if this agreement is terminated
during the second year of your employment, and a six month
severance if this agreement is terminated during the third or any subsequent year of your employment. You will be paid a monthly
salary of $ 10,000 per month, payable in arrears. You will
also be entitled to participate in any benefits programs that The Company provides to its other senior executives;
however you have elected not to participate in the Company’s health insurance program, so the
Company, in addition to your salary, will cover the $700
cost of your existing plan.


 


In
addition, you will receive stock options pursuant to the
Company’s 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, in the amount of 600,000 options. Duration, exercise price and other ancillary terms will
all be governed by the terms of the Plan pursuant to which the options are issued. These
options will vest monthly in equal amounts over the course of 30 months commencing in the seventh month of your employment pursuant
hereto, but if the Company terminates this agreement at any time any options that remain unvested will be canceled, and all vesting
will cease upon such termination. At the end of the third
year of your employment with the company salary, options, and other compensation will be renegotiated in good faith between the
parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
in the event of a “Change in
Control” (as defined in the 2014 Equity Incentive
Plan), all your options will immediately vest. The Company further agrees that the number of options granted to you pursuant hereto
will be reviewed in good faith within 6 months of the date
hereof by the full Board of Directors of the Company.


 


We all look forward
to your becoming an important member of our team, and it has already been a pleasure working with you.








	 	 	 
	Sincerely,	 
	 	 
	/s/ Craig Ellins	 
	 	 
	Craig Ellins	 
	Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 
	Agreed and Accepted:	 
	 	 
	/s/ John Poss	 
	John Poss	 
	 	 
	Date:	August 10, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47527-47528]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23951]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of 
September 8, 1997.
    A closed meeting will be held on Tuesday, September 9, 1997, at 
10:00 a.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified hat, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4), (8), (9)(A) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a) 
(4), (8), (9)(i) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled 
matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Hunt, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Tuesday, 
September 9, 1997, at 10:00 a.m., will be:

[[Page 47528]]

    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions.
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: September 4, 1997.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23951 Filed 9-5-97; 11:10 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Quality Assurance managers meet to collaborate
 
  By Quality Assurance Specialist Michael Heidbreder and DLA Energy Public Affairs
  Defense Logistics Agency Energy quality assurance representatives met for their biannual Quality Managers Policy Council Meeting at the McNamara Headquarters Complex, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, Oct. 29-Nov. 1.
 
DLA Energy Quality Technical Director Pam Serino emphasized the importance of meeting twice a year. “It’s essential for the regional quality managers to attend these biannual meetings to remain abreast of policy changes, participate in face-to-face discussions with our contracting customer business units, receive updates from the Office of Counsel and engage with the global DLA Energy quality community,” she said. “This meeting also provides an opportunity for our command group to field questions and concerns presented by the quality managers.” QMs are DLA Energy’s quality and technical experts who liaison with military service technical officers, customers, suppliers, foreign government partners and regulatory agencies. While fuel quality assurance issues can vary from region to region, the QMs provide guidance on acquisition, storage and distribution of DLA Energy managed products. “When I was a QM in the Middle East, these meetings were very beneficial,” said DLA Energy Quality Technical Deputy Director Bill Davenport. “The forum provides regional QMs the opportunity to engage and collaborate with DLA Energy headquarters personnel and address ongoing and emergent quality issues. It also affords them time to focus on big picture quality issues away from the daily demands of their jobs.” Topics discussed during the four-day conference included the DLA Energy quality assurance/surveillance program policy (includes MIL-STD-3004 and DLA Energy Regulation 4155.1), training and certification program (DLA Energy Regulation 4155.2), quality assurance of fuel specifications with renewable energy components requiring traceability, into-plane quality assurance changes, and secure fuel issues resolution, contamination detection and remediation. The next QM council meeting will take place during the2019 Worldwide Energy Conference held at the Gaylord National Hotel and Convention Center, National Harbor, Maryland, May 20-22, 2019. The WWEC is open for registration to the Department of Defense, federal agencies and industry as a forum to build relationships, develop energy solutions and engage in dialogue about issues critical to both industry and consumers.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09

- 12

- 00 493

- CR



### ________________

JUDITH AMANDA COOPER , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 10

- 09517

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Judith Amanda Cooper

p le ade d guil ty to aggravated assault

. The trial court found the evidence sufficie nt

to find Cooper guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed Cooper o n

commun ity supervision for five years, a nd assessed a fine of $ 500

. The State

subsequently filed a moti on t o revoke Cooper ’s unadjudicated community

sup ervision. Cooper ple ade d “true” to four vi olations of the conditions of her

community supervision. The trial court found that Cooper violated the conditions2 of her community supervision, found Cooper g uilty of aggravated assault , and

assessed punishment at seven years of confinement.

Cooper ’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional

evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State , 573

S.W. 2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On January 10 , 20 13 , we granted an

extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We receive d no response from

Cooper

.

We have reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel’s

conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it

unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re

- brief the appeal. Compare

Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial

court’s judgment. 1

AFFIRMED.

_________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN
Chief Justice

Submitted on April 30, 2013 Opinion Delivered May 8, 2013
Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.

1 Cooper may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2532

LISA MURRAY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOL Z. ROSEN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-476-A)

Submitted: June 21, 2004 Decided: July 28, 2004

Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lisa Murray, Appellant Pro Se. Sol Z. Rosen, Washington, D.C., for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Lisa Murray appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to her former attorney in her malpractice action

against him. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Murray v. Rosen, No. CA-03-476-A (E.D. Va.

filed Nov. 25, 2003 & entered Nov. 26, 2003).

To the extent that Murray appeals the district court’s

order for the reasons as stated from the bench on November 14,

2003, the record does not contain a transcript of that hearing. An

appellant has the burden of including in the record on appeal a

transcript of all parts of the proceedings material to the issues

raised on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); 4th Cir. R. 10(c).

An appellant proceeding on appeal in forma pauperis is entitled to

transcripts at government expense only in certain circumstances.

28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (2000). By failing to produce a transcript or

to qualify for the production of a transcript at government

expense, Murray has waived review of the issues on appeal that

depend upon the transcript to show error. See Powell v. Estelle,

959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir. 1992); Keller v. Prince George’s County,

827 F.2d 952, 954 n.1 (4th Cir. 1987). As no error appears on the

record before us and because Murray does not present a substantial

question on appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 753(f), we find that she does

not qualify for production of a transcript at government expense.
- 3 -

We deny Rosen’s motion to strike Murray’s informal brief and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### B. C. CLARK et al., v. Bura CONWAY et al., Members of the Board of Supervisors of Perry County.

No. 45578.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 22, 1969.

Lawrence D. Arrington, Hattiesburg, for appellant.

John M. Dunnam, Jr., New Augusta, James Finch, Hattiesburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Alan L. PRUNTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. David Robert MYDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. HH-226, HH-227.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 29, 1978.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Each appellant seeks review of an allegedly excessive sentence imposed following his voluntary plea of guilty to an amended information charging attempted robbery contrary to Sections 812.13 and 777.04, Fla.Stat. (1975). The information as amended contained no allegations concerning use of a firearm, deadly weapon, or other weapon. See Sections 812.13(2)(a) and 812.13(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1975). Each appellant was adjudicated guilty of attempted robbery.

The information as amended alleged an attempt to commit the offense proscribed by Section 812.13(2)(c) Fla.Stat. (1975). The maximum term of imprisonment for this offense is five years. Section 777.-04(4)(c), Fla.Stat. (1975). The sentences imposed on appellants are thus excessive and illegal. The sentences are vacated and the cases are remanded for proper sentencing under Sections 812.13(2)(c) and 777.04(4)(c), Fla.Stat. (1975). Appellants need not be present for resentencing.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and SMITH and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
#### Cecil C. WRIGHT, for the use and benefit of Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, a corp., and Walter Isham.

SC 2774.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Jan. 27, 1978.

John A. Courtney, Mobile, for appellant.

Fred W. Killion, Jr., Mobile, for appellee, Walter Isham.

MADDOX, Justice.

Cecil C. Wright appeals the trial court’s granting defendant Walter Isham’s motion to dismiss his complaint which Wright originally filed on January 5,1976, and amended on November 30, 1976, to read as follows:

> “Plaintiff claims of the Defendant Twenty-five Thousand and No/100 ($25,000.00) Dollars as damages for that heretofore on, to-wit the 14th day of December, 1974, the Plaintiff contracted with the Defendant for a valuable consideration paid by the Plaintiff to the Defendant to install a heating unit in his home at 5504 Topanga Street, Mobile, Alabama and the Defendant so negligently failed properly to perform his contract with the Plaintiff that a fire was caused or allowed to occur in the homeplace of your Plaintiff, causing considerable and permanent damage thereto; your Plaintiff was caused to expend extra monies for living expenses, repair the homeplace and most of its furniture and furnishings, all of which are the direct and proximate result and consequence of the Defendant’s failing properly to perform the contract with the Plaintiff and all for which the Plaintiff claims damages of the said Defendant in the amount aforesaid, plus interest and costs.”

The trial court determined that the complaint sounded in tort, and that the complaint affirmatively showed that the cause is barred by the one-year statute of limitations contained in Title 7, Sec. 26, Code of Alabama 1940. We reverse.

The sole issue we decide on this appeal is that the complaint should not have been dismissed for failure to state a claim. The complaint should not have been dismissed on this ground. *Carter v. Calhoun County Bd. of Ed.,*345 So.2d 1351 (Ala.1977). Obviously, the plaintiff has the burden of proving the allegations of his amended complaint, which sound in contract, and his recoverable damages, if proven, would be *354measured by the law governing damages in contract actions.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

TORBERT, C. J., and JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.