alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 16.1



SPEAR, SAFER, HARMON & CO.

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

8350 N.W. 52ND TERRACE, SUITE 301

MIAMI, FLORIDA 33166

1-800-776-1099

TEL: (305) 591-8850

FAX: (305) 593-9883

April 28, 2004



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549



Re:      Andean Development Corp.

File Ref. No. 33-90696



Dear Sirs/Mesdames:



We were previously the principal accountants for Andean Development Corp. and we reported on the consolidated financial statements of Andean Development Corp. and Subsidiaries as of the period since December 31, 1995.  As of this date, we were not engaged as the principal accountants for Andean Development Corp. We have read Andean Development Corp.'s statements under Item 4 of its Form 8-K/A dated April 28, 2004 and we agree with such statements.



For the most recent fiscal year of 2002 and any subsequent interim period, there has been no disagreement between Andean Development Corp. and Spear, Safer, Harmon & Co on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Spear, Safer, Harmon & Co would have caused it to make a reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its reports.



Very truly yours,



SPEAR, SAFER, HARMON & CO.
#### Ex parte Melvin Archie TUBERVILLE.

SC 2707.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 19, 1977.

BLOODWORTH, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and JONES, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
P.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

51) IV-E-39 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 9:15:29 AM Sheet 51 of 105 
P.2 

A-83-27 

CORPORATION

 i V L J y 

TELEPHONE CALL REPORT - INDUSTRIAL BOILER: S02 ADDITIONAL ANALYSES 

DATE: April 14, 1987 

TO: Bob Vander Molen 

1346 Willow Road 

Menlo Park, CA 94025 

(415) 324-4744 

FROM: David M. White 

SUBJECT: Information on Combustion Power FBC Units 

Mr. Vander Molen provided information on eleven CPC FBC boilers. CPC 

FBC units are designed with a bubbling bed and circulating fines. FBC 

boilers planned and under construction include the following: 

1) Biogen Power (Ivanpah, CA) 

o 1 FBC unit at 150,000 pph 

o Projected startup in early 1988 

o Will burn coal waste from Southern California Edison Mojave 

Power Plant 

o Sulfur content * 0.58%; Heating value » 9,148 Btu/lb 

o 97% S02 removal guaranteed 

o Subject to emissions limit of 9.4 lbs S02/hr (19 ppm) 

o Design Ca/S ratio of 1.8 

2) Cogeneration National Corp. (Stockton, CA) 

o 2 FBC units at 203,000 pph 

o Projected to start up in December 1987 

o Will burn low-volatile Canadian coal; 0.255% sulfur and 12,800 

Btu/lb 

o 88% S02 removal guaranteed 

Progress Center/3200 E. Chapel Hill Rd./Nelson Hwy./P.O. Box 13000/Research Triangle Park. N.C. 27709/(919)541-9100 
P.3 

Telephone Call Report 

Page 2 

o Subject to emissions limit of 26 lbs So2/hr (22 ppm) for both 

units combined at full load 

o Design Ca/S ratio of 1.8 

o When using ammonia injection for NO control, 96% S02 removal 

guaranteed. 

3) "Fresno Project" 

o 3 sites -- each with 212,000 pph FBC unit 

o Projected start up in mid-1989 to early 1990 

o Will burn Utah coal; 0.4% sulfur, 11,418 Btu/lb 

o Subject to emissions limit of 10.2 lbs SoVhr (20 ppm) 

o Designed for 95% S02 capture. 

4) Bay Area (Antioch/Stockton River) 

o 5 sites -- each with 150,000 pph FBC unit 

o Projected start up in mid-1989 to early 1990 

o Will burn petroleum coke 

o Sulfur content • 2.11% (4% maximum); Heating value =» 14,300 

Btu/lb 

o Designed for 97% S02 removal at a Ca/S ratio of 2.5. 

o Subject to an emissions limit of 15.2 lbs S02/hr (37 ppm)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsShuttle/spacelab contamination environment and effects handbookThis handbook is intended to assist users of the Spacelab/Space Transportation System by providing contamination environments and effects information that may be of value in planning, designing, manufacturing, and operating a space flight experiment. A summary of available molecular and particulate contamination data on the Space Transportation System and its facilities is presented. Contamination models, contamination effects, and protection methods information are also presented. In addition to contamination, the effects of the space environments at STS altitudes on spacecraft materials are included. Extensive references, bibliographies, and contacts are provided.Document ID19870009168Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBareiss, L. E.*(Martin Marietta Aerospace Denver, CO, United States)*Payton, R. M.*(Martin Marietta Aerospace Denver, CO, United States)*Papazian, H. A.*(Martin Marietta Aerospace Denver, CO, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1986Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-3993NAS 1.26:3993MCR-85-583Accession Number87N18601Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-35770Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870009168.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T D A N I EL H A RPER, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. N E L S O N , C orre ct i on alO ff i ce r, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 10- 15083 D. C. No . 2 : 0 7 - c v - 0 2 1 3 1 - M CE EFB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M orr i s on C . E ngl a nd, J r . , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r16, 2010 ** B efo re: T A S H IM A , B E R Z O N , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner D ani elH arper app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng w i thoutpr e j udi c e hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on f or f a ilu r e to e x h au s t a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s u n d e rth e P r is o n L itig a tio n R e f o rm A c t, 

# FI LED NO V 22 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 15083 2 42 U . S . C . § 1 99 7e(a ). W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 28 U . S . C . § 1 29 1. W e r evi ew de novo. W

y at t v . T e rhune , 3 1 5 F. 3 d1 1 0 8 , 1 1 1 7 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d H a rpe r ’ s a c t i on be c aus e he di d not c om pl e t e the pr i s on gr i e va nc e pr oc e s s a s t o a nyr e l e va ntgr i e va nc e be f or e f i l i ng s u it in f e d e r a l c o u rt. Se e G r iffin v . A r p a io , 557 F . 3d 1117, 1120 ( 9th C i r . 2009) (a ff irm in g d ism issa l fo r f

ailu re to ex h au st p riso n re m ed ies w h er e in m ate’s g ri ev an ce fai l edt o “ al ert [] th e p ri so n t o th e n atu re o f th e w ro n g fo r w h i ch red ress [ w a s ] s o u g h t” ) ; McKi nn eyv. Carey , 31 1 F . 3d 11 98 , 11 99 (9th C i r. 20 02 ) ( per c ur i a m ) ( e xhaus t i on unde r§ 1997e ( a ) m us toc c urpr i ort o c om m e nc e m e ntof the a c tio n ) . F u rth e r , H a rp e rf a ile dto s h o w th a t a d d itio n a l r e m e d ie s w e r e u n a v a ilab le t o h i m. H arper’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. H a rpe r ’ s pe ndi ng m ot i ons a r e de ni e d. AF F I RME D.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47817-47818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY


Open Meeting, Board of Visitors for the National Fire Academy

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, FEMA announces the following committee 
meeting.

    Name: Board of Visitors for the National Fire Academy.
    Dates of Meeting: October 2-5, 1997.
    Place: Building C, National Emergency Training Center, 
Emmitsburg, Maryland.
    Time: October 2, 1997, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.; October 3, 1997, 
8:30 a.m.-9:00 p.m.; October 4, 1997, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Proposed Agenda: October 2-4, 1997, Review National Fire Academy 
Program Activities. October 5, 1997, Attend National Fallen 
Firefighters Memorial Ceremony.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public with 
seating available on a first-come, first-served basis. Members of the 
general public who plan to attend the meeting should contact the Office 
of the Superintendent, National Fire Academy, U.S. Fire Administration, 
16825 South Seton Avenue, Emmitsburg, MD 21727, (301) 447-1117, on or 
before September 30, 1997.

    Minutes of the meeting will be prepared and will be available 
for public viewing in the Office of the Administrator, U.S. Fire 
Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emmitsburg, MD 
21727. Copies of the minutes will be available upon request 30 days 
after the meeting.


[[Page 47818]]


    Dated: September 4, 1997.
Carrye B. Brown,
U.S. Fire Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-24157 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-01-P-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23427]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-33,209]

Parker Abex NWL Aerospace Kalamazoo, Michigan; Notice of Revised 
Determination on Reconsideration

    On July 24, 1997, the Department issued an Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers 
and former workers of the subject firm. The notice will soon be 
published in the Federal Register.
    The workers at Parker Abex NWL Aerospace in Kalamazoo, Michigan 
produced flight control systems including hydraulic actuators, flight 
controls, and hydraulic pumps. The worker petition for TAA was 
initially denied because the ``contributed importantly'' test of the 
Group Eligibility Requirements of Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974, 
as amended, was not met. The layoffs were attributable to the transfer 
of production from Kalamazoo, Michigan to other plants located 
domestically.
    The petitioner presented information regarding import impact that 
had not been considered in the initial determination.
    On reconsideration the Department surveyed the major declining 
customers of the subject firm. The survey results revealed that 
customers increased import purchases of flight control systems from 
1995 to 1996.

Conclusion

    After careful consideration of the new facts obtained on 
reconsideration, it is concluded that the workers of Parker Abex, NWL 
Aerospace, Kalamazoo, Michigan were adversely affected by increased 
imports of articles like or directly competitive with transformers 
produced at the subject firm.

    ``All workers of Parker Abex NWL Aerospace, Kalamazoo, Michigan, 
engaged in employment related to the production of flight control 
systems, who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after February 1, 1996 are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.''

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of August 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-23427 Filed 9-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000943904
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND V L.P., SERIES 3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US CURRENCY
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### Edward J. PULLINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-871.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 30, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; William Clayton Johnson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Allen WILLIAMS.

No. 60947.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 15, 1978.

Barry F. Viosca, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Brian G. Meissner, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47529-47530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation Advisory Board; 
Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. I) notice is hereby given of a meeting 
of the Advisory Board of the Saint Lawrence

[[Page 47530]]

Seaway Development Corporation (SLSDC), to be held at 10:00 a.m., 
September 17, 1997, in the Associate Administrator's Conference Room, 
SLSDC Administration Building, 180 Andrews Street, Massena, New York. 
The agenda for this meeting will be as follows: Opening Remarks; 
Consideration of Minutes of Past Meeting; Review of Programs; New 
Business; and Closing Remarks.
    Attendance at meeting is open to the interested public but limited 
to the space available. With the approval of the Administrator, members 
of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons 
wishing further information should contact not later than September 12, 
1997, Marc C. Owen, Advisory Board Liaison, Saint Lawrence Seaway 
Development Corporation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590; 
202-366-6823.
    Any member of the public may present a written statement to the 
Advisory Board at any time.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on September 4, 1997.
Marc C. Owen,
Advisory Board Liaison.
[FR Doc. 97-23781 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-61-U
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                              DISCREET LOGIC INC.
 
                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        STATE OR JURISDICTION
NAME                                                      OF INCORPORATION
----                                                 ---------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>
3380491 Canada Inc.................................. Canada
Bandit Communications, Inc.......................... Delaware
Discreet Logic Asia Pte Ltd......................... Republic of Singapore
Discreet Logic Desktop Inc.......................... Delaware
Discreet Logic (Desktop) Inc........................ Barbados
Discreet Logic Europe S.A........................... Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Discreet Logic France S.A.R.L....................... France
Discreet Logic International Ltd.................... Ireland
Discreet Logic Investment Corp...................... Delaware
Discreet Logic GmbH................................. Austria
Discreet Logic GmbH................................. Federal Republic of Germany
Discreet Logic KK................................... Japan
Discreet Logic Research Limited..................... United Kingdom
Discreet Logic (UK) Limited......................... United Kingdom
Discreet Logic--USA, Inc............................ Delaware
Discreet Logic--USA Research, Inc................... Delaware
D-Vision Systems Inc................................ Illinois
Lightscape Technologies Inc......................... Delaware
</TABLE>
#### Carol Jean COX, formerly Carol Jean Gann, Appellant, v. Garland Hubert GANN, Appellee.

No. M-17.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 24, 1970.

Decker, Elliott & Kaler, P. A., Jacksonville, for appellant.

Ralph Roberts, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court hereby appealed from is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Helping People Help the Land

Chesapeake Bay Watershed 

Initiative

Overview

The Chesapeake Bay Watershed 

Initiative (CBWI) complements 

State and Federal conservation 

efforts that improve water quality 

and quantity and restore, enhance, 

and preserve soil, air, and related 

resources within the Chesapeake 

Bay Watershed. CBWI helps 

producers enhance land and water 

resources by:

	 •	 controlling erosion and

 reducing sediment and

 surface water; and

	 •	 planning, designing,

 implementing, and evaluating

 habitat conservation,

 restoration, and enhance-

 ment measures.

The Chesapeake Bay Watershed 

is defined as all tributaries,

backwaters, and side channels 

and their watersheds that drain 

into the Chesapeake Bay in the 

states of Delaware, Maryland, 

New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, 

and West Virginia as well as the 

District of Columbia.

CBWI is carried out through 

the—Environmental Quality 

Incentives Program, Cooperative 

Conservation Partnership 

Initiative, and Wildlife Habitat 

Incentives Program. 

Priorities

President Obama’s Executive 

Order, signed in May 2009, 

charges the federal government 

with exercising greater leadership 

in restoring the Chesapeake 

Bay and its tributaries. USDA 

Natural Resources Conservation 

Service (NRCS) and its partners 

are helping farmers voluntarily 

implement conservation practices 

to reduce nutrient and sediment 

runoff into the Bay.

The NRCS and its partners 

identified more than 1,000 highpriority watersheds based on 

several factors. The main factors 

include soils having a high risk 

for nutrient and sediment runoff 

or nutrient infiltration; and areas

scientifically identified as having

high agricultural nitrogen and 

phosphorous concentrations.

Expected Outcomes

The expected outcomes for the 

CBWI are producers applying 

new conservation practices on 

agricultural working lands in the 

high-priority watersheds; restoring 

tidal and non-tidal wetlands and 

enhancing the function of degraded 

wetlands; and protecting lands 

identified as high conservation

priorities.

July 2011

This corn field on a farm in Maryland will be planted to cover crops to help take up excess nutrients and prevent soil erosion.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed.

www.nrcs.usda.gov

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 

Eligibility

CBWI participants must meet all 

eligibility requirements for the Farm 

Bill programs they choose to use 

to carry out their conservation 

plans. Also, the land must lie within 

the defined Chesapeake Bay

Watershed.

More Information

For more information about the 

Chesapeake Bay Watershed 

Initiative, please visit the Natural 

Resources Conservation Service 

Web site at

http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/feature/

chesapeakebay/chesapeakebay.

html

Chesapeake Bay Watershed 

Contacts:

Rob McAfee

Chesapeake Bay Coordinator

Phone: (443) 482-2953

Email: robert.mcafee@md.usda.

gov

Mike Permenter

Natural Resource Specialist

Phone: (202) 720-3360

Email: mike.permenter@md.usda.

gov
PUBLIC LAW 111–251—SEPT. 30, 2010 124 STAT. 2631 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3839: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Sept. 24, considered and passed Senate. 

Sept. 28, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–251 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small 

Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION 

OF PROGRAMS UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND 

THE SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to 

extend temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business 

Administration’’, approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109–316; 

120 Stat. 1742), as most recently amended by section 1 of Public 

Law 111–214 (124 Stat. 2346), is amended by striking ‘‘September 

30, 2010’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘January 31, 2011’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection 

(a) shall take effect on September 29, 2010. 

Approved September 30, 2010. 

Sept. 30, 2010 

[S. 3839] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAW