alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15.1


                           Accountants' Acknowledgment


The Board of Directors
The Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.:

The Owners of
Bottling Group, LLC:


With respect to the  registration  statements  listed below,  we acknowledge our
awareness  of the use  therein of our reports dated July 8, 2004  related to our
reviews of The Pepsi  Bottling  Group,  Inc.  and  Bottling  Group,  LLC interim
financial information.

o      Form S-8 dated May 26, 1999                 (File No. 333-79357)
o      Form S-8 dated May 26, 1999                 (File No. 333-79369)
o      Form S-8 dated May 26, 1999                 (File No. 333-79375)
o      Form S-8 dated May 26, 1999                 (File No. 333-79365)
o      Form S-8 dated June 14, 1999                (File No. 333-80647)
o      Form S-8 dated May 8, 2001                  (File No. 333-60428)
o      Form S-8 dated September 19, 2001           (File No. 333-69622)
o      Form S-8 dated November 14, 2001            (File No. 333-73302)
o      Form S-8 dated October 28, 2002             (File No. 333-100786)

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the  Securities  Act of 1933 (the Act),  such reports
are not considered part of a registration  statement prepared or certified by an
accountant, or reports prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.


/s/ KPMG LLP




New York, New York
July 21, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23126]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration


Designations for the Minot (ND), Southern Illinois (IL), and Tri-
State (OH) Areas

AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration 
(GIPSA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: GIPSA announces the designation of Minot Grain Inspection, 
Inc. (Minot), Southern Illinois Grain Inspection Service, Inc. 
(Southern Illinois), and Tri-State Grain Inspection Service, Inc. (Tri-
State), to provide official services under the United States Grain 
Standards Act, as amended (Act).

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 1997.

ADDRESSES: USDA, GIPSA, FGIS, Janet M. Hart, Chief, Review Branch, 
Compliance Division, STOP 3604, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., 
Washington, DC 20250-3604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet M. Hart, telephone 202-720-8525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    This action has been reviewed and determined not to be a rule or 
regulation as defined in Executive Order 12866 and Departmental 
Regulation 1512-1; therefore, the Executive Order and Departmental 
Regulation do not apply to this action.
    In the April 1, 1997, Federal Register (62 FR 15456), GIPSA asked 
persons interested in providing official services in the geographic 
areas assigned to Minot, Southern Illinois, and Tri-State to submit an 
application for designation. Applications were due by April 30, 1997. 
Minot, Southern Illinois, and Tri-State, the only applicants, each 
applied for designation to provide official services in the entire area 
currently assigned to them.
    Since Minot, Southern Illinois, and Tri-State were the only 
applicants for the respective areas, GIPSA did not ask for comments on 
the applicants.
    GIPSA evaluated all available information regarding the designation 
criteria in Section 7(f)(l)(A) of the Act; and according to Section 
7(f)(l)(B), determined that Minot, Southern Illinois, and Tri-State are 
able to provide official services in the geographic areas for which 
they applied. Effective October 1, 1997, and ending September 30, 2000, 
Minot, Southern Illinois, and Tri-State are designated to provide 
official services in the geographic areas specified in the April 1, 
1997, Federal Register.
    Interested persons may obtain official services by contacting Minot 
at 701-838-1734, Southern Illinois at 618-632-1921, and Tri-State at 
513-251-6571.

    Authority: Pub. L. 94-582, 90 Stat. 2867, as amended (7 U.S.C. 
71 et seq.)

    Dated: August 14, 1997
Neil E. Porter
Director, Compliance Division
[FR Doc. 97-23126 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-EN-F
[Cite as State v. Elam, 2024-Ohio-2855.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

CLERMONT COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO,

Appellee,

 - vs -

RUSTY ERNEST ELAM,

Appellant.

:

:

:

:

:

:

CASE NO. CA2024-02-015

D E C I S I O N

 7/29/2024

APPEAL FROM CLERMONT COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case No. 2023 CR 000456

Mark J. Tekulve, Clermont County Prosecuting Attorney, and Nicholas Horton, Assistant 

Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

W. Stephen Haynes, Clermont County Public Defender, and Robert F. Benintendi, Assistant 

Public Defender, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant, Rusty Ernest Elam, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript 

of proceedings and original papers from the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas, and 

upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.
{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from 

the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights 

of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists two potential 

errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744; (3) requests that this court 

review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from 

prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests 

permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly 

frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been 

served upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason 

that it is wholly frivolous.

BYRNE, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1751 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1751

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the State sentences 
for which burial in National Cemeteries and Arlington National Cemetery 
are prohibited to include any sentence of life imprisonment for a State 
                             capital crime.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2005

 Ms. Mikulski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the State sentences 
for which burial in National Cemeteries and Arlington National Cemetery 
are prohibited to include any sentence of life imprisonment for a State 
                             capital crime.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF STATE SENTENCES FOR WHICH BURIAL IN NATIONAL 
              CEMETERIES AND ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETERY ARE 
              PROHIBITED.

    (a) State Sentences To Include Any Sentence of Life Imprisonment 
for State Capital Crime.--Subsection (b)(2) of section 2411 of title 
38, United States Code, is amended by striking ``without parole''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (d)(2) of such section is 
amended by striking ``without parole''.
                                 <all>
```
----

| 1. | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  August      14, 2008 |    |                                       |   |
|---------------------------------------|---------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  | Signed: | /s/ Kelvin Claney                          |   |
|                                  |    | President      and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                  |    |                                       |   |
|                                  | Signed: | /s/ Karl Redekopp                          |   |
|                                  |    | Chief      Financial Officer               |

----
# L_2023221EN.01000101.xml

| 8.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 221/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 221/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2023/1702

of 1 September 2023

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Milas Yağlı Zeytini’ (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Turkey’s application to register the name ‘Milas Yağlı Zeytini’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Turkey’s application to register the name ‘Milas Yağlı Zeytini’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Milas Yağlı Zeytini’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Milas Yağlı Zeytini’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Milas Yağlı Zeytini’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. ‘Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed’ of Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 September 2023.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 174, 16.5.2023, p. 30.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
1

 In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 09-221V

Filed: January 8, 2016

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

D.B., * UNPUBLISHED

 *

Petitioner, * Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman

 *

v. * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs;

 * Reasonable Amount Requested to

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Which Respondent Does Not Object.

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

 *

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Diane C. Cooper, Bruce G. Clark & Associates, P.C., for Petitioner.

Alexis Babcock, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

DECISION1

On April 14, 2009, D.B. (“Petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National Vaccine 

Injury Compensation Program.

2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006). On January 9, 2014, the 

undersigned issued a decision dismissing the petition, and on January 14, 2014, judgment entered 

on the dismissal. 

On January 12, 2015, the above captioned-counsel entered her appearance on behalf of 

Petitioner, and on January 13, 2015, Petitioner filed a motion to vacate the judgment. The 

undersigned denied Petitioner’s motion on September 4, 2015. 

On December 21, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Facts Regarding Final

Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. Pursuant to their Stipulation, the parties have agreed to an award of 

$14,000.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs. In accordance with General Order Number 9, the parties 

represent that Petitioner has not personally incurred any costs during the time that Ms. Cooper 

has represented her.

 1 This decision was originally filed on December 21, 2015. In the reissued decision, Petitioner’s 

name is, at her request, replaced with her initials; the remainder of the decision is unchanged.

2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National 

Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 

42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to 

individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.
2

The undersigned finds that the motion to vacate judgment was brought in good faith and 

that there existed a reasonable basis for filing it. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is 

appropriate, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount 

seems reasonable and appropriate. Accordingly, the undersigned hereby awards the amount 

of $14,000.00, in the form of a check made payable jointly to Petitioner and Petitioner’s

counsel, Diane C. Cooper, of the law firm of Bruce G. Clark & Associates, P.C. 

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of 

the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ 

stipulation.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman

 Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman

Special Master

 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint 

filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
EXHIBIT
32-2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund
V, L.P., Series 3 (the “Partnership”) for the year ended March 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk., Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the
Partnership, hereby certify that:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial
 condition
and result of operations of the Partnership.
 
 
 
 /s/Melanie R.
Wenk
  Melanie
R. Wenk
 Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
 
 Date:
June 29, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24083]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-510-000]


Gas Transport, Inc.; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

September 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on September 2, 1997, Gas Transport, Inc. (GTI) 
tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff Second Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheet, with an effective 
date of October 2, 1997:

First Revised Sheet No. 125

    GTI states that this tariff sheet is being filed to comply with the 
Order on Remand issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on 
February 27, 1997, in Docket Nos. RM 91-11-006 and RM87-34-072. Order 
No. 636-C, 78 FERC para. 61,186 (1997). GTI has revised Section 11.5 
entitled ``Right to Match Best Bid'' of the General Terms and 
Conditions of its FERC Gas Tariff to incorporate the Commission's 
requirement in Ordering Paragraph (B) that any pipeline with a right of 
first refusal tariff provision containing a contract term cap longer 
than five years file tariff revisions to reduce the cap to five years.
    GTI further states that copies of this filing were served upon its 
jurisdictional customers and the Regulatory Commissions of the states 
of Ohio and West Virginia.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24083 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Guidebook for risk perception and communication in water resources planning**
 
Part: One | Two
 
SuDoc Number:D 103.57/5:93-R-13 | D103.57/5:93-R-14
Item Number:0337-B-03 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 001065609
 
July 30, 2018
Exhibit 31.1
 Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Central Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/
John D. DohertyJohn D. DohertyChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Elnora Tate PERRY et al. v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 62212.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 2, 1978.

In re: State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. applying for supervisory or remedial writs. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                      SUBSIDIARIES OF DISCREET LOGIC INC.

   The Registrant owns 100% of the outstanding voting securities of the
following corporations, as of June 23, 1999, all of which are included in the
Registrant's consolidated financial statements:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                              <C>
   Name                                          Jurisdiction of Incorporation
   ----                                          -----------------------------
   Discreet Logic Asia- Pacific Pte, Ltd.        Singapore
   Discreet Logic KK                             Japan
   Discreet Logic (Brazil) Industria e Comercio
   Ltda                                          Brazil
   Discreet Logic Europe S.A.                    Luxembourg
   Discreet Logic France SARL                    France
   Discreet Logic (UK) Ltd.                      United Kingdom
   Discreet Logic GmbH                           Germany
</TABLE>