alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStudy of wind change for the development of loads reduction techniques for the space shuttleWind change statistics are analyzed for Vandenberg AFB, California (VAFB) and Kennedy Space Center, Florida (KSC). Means and standard deviations of wind component change and vector wind change modulus within 3-9 and 9-16 km altitude bands are tabulated. The contribution to 3.5 hr wind component change by wind perturbations in various wavelength bands is evaluated. Probability distributions of maximum 3.5 hr wind change in an altitude band are presented and a model for wind change at a specified altitude is tested with data derived from six data bases from VAFB and Santa Monica, California.Document ID19870009509Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsAdelfang, S. I.*(Computer Sciences Corp. Huntsville, AL, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1987Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryMeteorology And ClimatologyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:4045NASA-CR-4045Accession Number87N18942Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-35974Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870009509.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### WORTMAN & MANN INS. AGENCY v. Frank IVEY.

No. 45316.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 7, 1969.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1969.

W. E. Gore, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

Price & Jones, Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 25, 2011 

d0718 

Order 

 

July 25, 2011 

142232-3(59) 

JASON R. SALENBIEN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

and 

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Intervening Plaintiff/Cross- 

 Appellant 

v SC: 142232-3 

 COA: 291517, 291543 

WCAC: 08-000062 

ARROW UNIFORM RENTAL LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, 

Defendant-Appellant/CrossAppellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 29, 

2011 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46720-46721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23494]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 072597B]


Advisory Panel on Highly Migratory Species Fisheries

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of intent; request for nominations; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is correcting a notice that appeared in the Federal 
Register of Thursday, August 28, 1997 (62 FR 45629) in column one. The 
original notice was published with an incorrect date for receipt of 
nominations. The date for receipt of nominations should be September 
12, 1997. Nominations may be sent to Rebecca Lent, Chief, Highly 
Migratory Species Management Division, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910. Nominations may be faxed to (301) 713-1917.


[[Page 46721]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Liz Lauck (301) 713-2347.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 072597B, appearing on page 45629 
in the Federal Register of Thursday, August 28, 1997, the following 
correction is made:
    1. On page 45629, in the first column, ``Nominations must be 
submitted by September 29, 1997'' is changed to ``Nominations must be 
submitted by September 12, 1997.
    Dated: August 28, 1997.
Gary C. Matlock,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-23494 Filed 9-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
# DLA Land and Maritime Academy returns this fall

/ Published Oct. 4, 2018
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Land and Maritime Academy will be held Oct. 30 – Nov. 1 from 8 – 4 p.m. in Building 11 room 801. 

The purpose of the Academy is to increase DLA Land and Maritime employees understanding of the organization’s mission and how it’s accomplished. Several presenters are scheduled to speak about their directorates and provide insight on their mission, leadership, strategic focus, customers, current and future projects and plans, metrics and points of contact.

**The target audience for this Academy is associates employed with DLA Land and Maritime for less than five years.**  DLA’s People and Culture Directorate is currently working with training coordinators and directorate points of contact to identify employees in this target audience who are available to attend the upcoming session.  Supervisors with any questions regarding specific employees on the target audience list should contact their training coordinators.

Employees who attend the Academy will self-enroll in LMS using the course title “Land and Maritime Academy.”  Employees can choose a date to attend using one of the following course IDs: 
      - 55180 Oct. 30    
      - 55181 Oct. 31    
      -  55182 Nov. 1    

Please note the following:
      - Employees only need to  attend**one** session .    
      - Seventy seats will be available each session.    
      - Employees will choose the session they want to attend. See self-enroll note above.    
      - Employees should self-enroll on or before Oct. 10. 
      - Attendance is **mandatory**  for those employees able to attend.    
      - Employees who previously attended the Academy will not need to attend again.    
      - Employees are encouraged to  contact the Land and Maritime Equal Employment Office  to request reasonable accommodations.    

For questions, email the program manager.
#### Angel GUERRA, Plaintiff, v. GULF INSURANCE COMPANY, Garland E. Denmark and Reid & Son, Inc., Defendants.

No. 77-1243.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 19, 1977.

Irving.G. Lawrence, P. A., Tampa, for plaintiff.

David A. Maney and Lee S. Damsker of Gordon & Maney, P. A., Tampa, for petitioner Richard Mulholland.

*355PER CURIAM.

In the exercise of our discretion and within the purview of Fla.App. Rule 4.6, we decline to answer the question certified by the trial court.

McNULTY, A. C. J., and OTT and RYDER, JJ., concur.
#### Esther E. HIGGINS, Petitioner, v. SAND DOLLAR RESTAURANT and Michigan Mutual Liability Company, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38647.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 25, 1969.

Rehearing Denied July 25, 1969.

David T. Henniger, of Masterson, Lloyd, Sundberg & Rogers, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.

George H. Brown, III, St. Petersburg, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date April 25, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for attorneys fees filed by Petitioner is also denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**MARC NABI MOGHADAM**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 99 DB 2016 (No. 62 RST 2016)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 88620** 

**(Montgomery County)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 25 th**  **day of August, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of**  **Disciplinary Board Member dated August 17, 2016, is app roved and it is ORDERED**  **that Marc Nabi Moghadam, who has been on Administrativ e Suspension, has never**  **been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral**  **qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the**  **Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to act ive status as a member of the**  **Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation**  **and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petit ioner.**
EXHIBIT
      32.1





SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Global Food Technologies, Inc.
      ("Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the undersigned, in
      the
      capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to their
      knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 15,
      2008





/s/
                Keith MeeksKeith
                Meeks, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/
                Marshall F SparksMarshall
                F. Sparks, Chief Financial
                Officer
# Distribution commanding officer speaks at local MOAA event

/ Published Sept. 21, 2018
CAMP HILL, Pa., 
Navy Rear Admiral Kevin M. Jones, Commander, DLA Distribution recently spoke at the Keystone Capital Chapter of the Military Officers Association of America (MOAA) event in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania. 

The MOAA Keystone Capital Chapter is comprised of military officers from all branches of military service and many are previous employees of DLA Distribution in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania. RDML Jones provided a presentation highlighting the mission and latest achievements of DLA Distribution and also provided photos and a description of the new LEED Certified DLA Distribution Headquarters building.
#### COASTAL POWER PRODUCTS, INC., Appellants, v. DAYTONA MARINA & BOAT WORKS and James Rivers, Appellees.

No. HH-416.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 18, 1978.

George E. Ridge and David W. Carstetter of Kent, Sears, Durden & Kent, Jacksonville, for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Coastal Power, a third party defendant, seeks interlocutory review from the trial court’s denial of the motion to dismiss for lack of venue. The order is affirmed, there having been no manifest inconvenience, and therefore abuse of discretion, shown. *State of Florida, Department of Transportation v. San Marco Contracting Company,*355 So.2d 133 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); *Dorr-Oliver, Inc. v. Linder Industrial Machinery Co.,*263 So.2d 237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972); *Mosby and Russell Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Hudson Company of Florida,*299 So.2d 53 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); *Keller Building Products of Sarasota, Inc. v. Pan American Aluminum Corp.,*347 So.2d 728 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99.13

CERTIFICATION

REQUIRED
BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

Agrium Inc. (the Company) is filing its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the
Report) with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

I, Steve J. Douglas, Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 2, 2017



/S/ STEVE J. DOUGLASName:

Steve J. DouglasTitle:

Senior Vice President &Chief Financial Officer
#### Alfred KYSER v. STATE.

No. 38927.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 1969.

Appeal dismissed without opinion. 225 So.2d 472.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 3.1.2.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                              DeCRANE HOLDINGS CO.

         DeCrane Holdings Co. (the "Company"), a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the "Delaware Law"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Company has duly adopted the
following resolution:

         RESOLVED that the Board of Directors hereby declares it advisable and
         in the best interests of the Company that Article Fourth of the
         Certificate of Incorporation be amended to read as follows:

                  FOURTH: THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SHARES OF STOCK WHICH THE COMPANY
         SHALL HAVE AUTHORITY TO ISSUE IS 12,500,000, CONSISTING OF 10,000,000
         SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE, AND 2,500,000 SHARES
         OF PREFERRED STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE (THE "PREFERRED STOCK").
         THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS HEREBY EMPOWERED TO AUTHORIZE BY RESOLUTION
         OR RESOLUTIONS FROM TIME TO TIME THE ISSUANCE OF ONE OR MORE CLASSES OR
         SERIES OF PREFERRED STOCK AND TO FIX THE DESIGNATIONS, POWERS,
         PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE, PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL OR OTHER RIGHTS, IF
         ANY, AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS THEREOF, IF
         ANY, WITH RESPECT TO EACH SUCH CLASS OR SERIES OF PREFERRED STOCK AND
         THE NUMBER OF SHARES CONSTITUTING EACH SUCH CLASS OR SERIES, AND TO
         INCREASE OR DECREASE THE NUMBER OF SHARES OF ANY SUCH CLASS OR SERIES
         TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY DELAWARE LAW.

         SECOND: That the aforesaid amendment has been consented to and
authorized by the holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding stock
entitled to vote by written consent given in accordance with the provisions of
Section 228 of the Delaware Law.

         THIRD: That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with
the applicable provisions of Section 242 and 228 of the Delaware Law.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its authorized officer, this 8th day of May, 2000.

                                             By:      /s/ Richard J. Kaplan
                                                      -------------------------
                                                      Richard J. Kaplan
                                                      its Secretary
EXHIBIT
      32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 
 AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 
 SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002
 
 In
      connection with the Annual Report of Ever-Glory International Group, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Kang Yi Hua , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 By:  /s/ Kang Yi
      Hua
 Kang
      Yi
      Hua
 Chief
      Executive Officer
 
 July
          	11,
          2007
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000618 13-MAY-2019 08:32 AM**NOT FOR**  **PUBLICATION IN**  **WEST'S HAW** **AI'I REPORTS**  **AND PACIFIC**  **REPORTER**

**opening brief**  **had expired,**  **the matter**  **would be**  **called to**  **the court's attention**  **on De**  **cember 13,**  **2018, for**  **appropriate action,**  **which could**  **include dismissal**  **of the**  **appeal, under**  **Hawai'i Rules**  **of Appellate**  **Procedure Rules**  **12.l(e) and**  **30, and**  **Steele may**  **request relief**  **from default**  **by motion;**  **and**

**dismissed. (5)**  **Ste ele**  **took no**  **further act**  **ion in**  **this appeal.** 

**T herefore,**  **IT IS**  **H EREBY**  **OR DERED**  **that the**  **appeal is** 

**Dated: Honolulu,**  **Hawai'i, M**  **ay 1**  **3, 201**  **9 .** 

**Associate Judge** 

**Associate Judge** 

**2**
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHAEL R. SHEMONSKY, : Civil No. 04cv2759

Plaintiff :

: Judge Jones

v. :

:

THOMAS I. VANASKIE, et al., :

Defendants :

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

July 18, 2005

THE BACKGROUND OF THIS ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:

Pending before the Court is an Affidavit to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

(“Affidavit to Proceed IFP”) (doc. 20) filed by Plaintiff Michael R. Shemonsky

(“Plaintiff” or “Shemonsky”) on July 8, 2005. For the reasons that follow, we will

deny the Application to Proceed IFP.

DISCUSSION:

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) states, in pertinent part, that:

[A]ny court of the United States may authorize the commencement,

prosecution or defense of any suit, action or proceeding, civil or

criminal, or appeal therein, without prepayment of fees or security

therefor, by a person who submits an affidavit that includes a

statement of all assets such [person] prisoner possesses that the person

is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor. Such affidavit

shall state the nature of the action, defense or appeal and affiant’s

belief that the person is entitled to redress.

As required under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), Plaintiff submitted a sworn

Case 4:04-cv-02759-JEJ Document 21 Filed 07/18/05 Page 1 of 3
1

 Although Plaintiff’s handwriting is difficult to read it appears, that he has written that

his unemployment compensation of $467 per week “started after one week waiting period and

for 6 months.” (See Rec. Doc. 20 at 3). 

2

Affidavit to Proceed IFP to the Court on July 8, 2005 that included a statement of

his general financial position, including assets, income, and expenses. (See Rec.

Doc. 20). In the affidavit, Plaintiff swore the following: that he is not presently

employed; that he was last employed on April 15, 2005 and the amount of wages

per month he received was $4200; that within the past twelve months he has 

received money from unemployment compensation in the amount of $467 per

week;1

 that he has $2800 in cash and/or checking or savings accounts; that he does

not own real estate, stocks, bonds, notes, automobiles, or other valuable property,

excluding ordinary household furnishings and clothing; and that he does not have

any dependents. 

We note that up until April 15, 2005, Plaintiff was paid $4200 a month and

is currently receiving $467 per week in unemployment compensation. The Court

consequently finds that since the Affidavit to Proceed IFP does not satisfy the

requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), leave to proceed in forma pauperis is not

granted in the case sub judice.

Case 4:04-cv-02759-JEJ Document 21 Filed 07/18/05 Page 2 of 3
3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff’s Affidavit to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. 20) is

DENIED.

s/ John E. Jones III

 John E. Jones III

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-02759-JEJ Document 21 Filed 07/18/05 Page 3 of 3
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnalytical study of acoustic response of a semireverberant enclosure with application to active noise controlThe acoustic response of a semireverberant enclosure with two interacting, velocity-prescribed source distributions was analyzed using standard modal analysis techniques with a view toward a better understanding of active noise control. Different source and enclosure dimensions, source separations, and single-wall admittances were studied over representative frequency bandwidths of 10 Hz with source relative phase as a parameter. Results indicate that power radiated into the enclosure agree qualitatively with the spatial average of the mean square pressure, even though the reverberant field is nondiffuse. Decreases in acoustic power can therefore be used to estimate global noise reduction in a nondiffuse semireverberant environment. As might be expected, parametric studies indicate that maximum power reductions of up to 25 dB can be achieved when secondary and primary sources are compact and closely spaced. Although less success is achieved with increasing frequency and source separation or size, significant suppression of up to 8 dB still occurs over the 1 to 2 Hz bandwidth.Document ID19860006570Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsParrott, T. L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Schein, D. B.*(George Washington Univ. Hampton, Va., United States)*Gridley, D.*(Naval Avionics Center Indianapolis, Ind., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1985Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.60:2472L-15944NASA-TP-2472Accession Number86N16040Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-33-90-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860006570.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024