alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50070 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALEJANDRO ACEVEDO-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-03-CR-629-ALL-DB

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Alejandro Acevedo-Garcia has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel has notified this court that she has no information on the whereabouts of her client and that it is her understanding that soon after he was sentenced, he was deported to Mexico. She asserted that she instructed him to communicate with her as soon United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 04-50070 -2- as he was deported but that he has not done so. Thus, she was unable to provide a certificate of service on him. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OPEN-FILE REPORT 80-303
UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PLATE 10f 2
5 a "

122°07'30" 122°00°

48°22'30" a a 4 : BOE 48°22'30"

500 000
FEET

5345000m.N.

48°15'

122°07'30" 1 690 000 FEET °73000m.E. 122°00'

Produced by the Geological Survey

Orthophotograph prepared from 1:76,000-scale ' a
aerial photographs taken Aug. 30, 1974 4000 7000 FEET This report is preliminary and has not

Tee been edited or reviewed for comformity
Projection and 10,000-foot grid ticks: Washington coordinate with Geological Survey standards and
system, north zone (Lambert conformal conic) aemanciiatane.
1,000-metre Universal Transverse Mercator grid ticks, omench .
zone 10. 1927 North American datum

Photoimagery transformed by scanning techniques CLEAR LAKE SE, WASH.

which may produce double or mismatched images; N4815-W1 2200/7 5
use the mean of image positions for map point. 1974 ¥

PRELIMINARY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE CLEAR LAKE SE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON . ,ovance print
By
David P. Dethier, John T. Whetten, and Paul R. Carroll

1980
# DLA Installation Operations Richmond’s EMS passes audit, under stricter standards

/ Published June 8, 2018
Richmond, Va., 
Defense Logistics Agency Installation Operations Richmond’s Environmental Management System underwent an extremely thorough and detailed audit May 8-10 based on new ISO 14001: 2015 Environmental Management Systems standard.

DLA Installation Operations Richmond’s EMS has been registered to ISO 14001 standards since 2004.  At that time, it became the sole DLA activity to obtain this level of environmental performance while joining a handful of other registered Department of Defense sites.    

An EMS program allows DLA Installation Operations Richmond to manage environmental responsibilities in a structured, comprehensive and well-documented manner on Defense Supply Center Richmond, Virginia.  

“It allows us to meet all of our environmental obligations, improve the way we do business with respect to the environment, and reduce our overall environmental impact upon the installation and our neighboring community,” said Jimmy Parrish, chief, Environmental Management Division, DLA Installation Operations Richmond. 

In September 2015, the ISO 14001 standard was significantly updated.  Additional mandatory topic areas were included and the level and detail of necessary system documentation was increased.  According to Parrish, registered sites have until December 30, 2018, to successfully demonstrate conformance and compliance with the new standard. 

The independently certified, impartial third-party registrar, who conducted the audit, covered all 29 elements of the new ISO14001:2015 standard.  More than 20 DLA Installation Operations at Richmond employees were interviewed and numerous pieces of documentation were reviewed and scrutinized. 

“After three long and grueling days, the third-party registrar formally documented only one minor non-conformity with the new standard, along with three suggested opportunities for improvement,” Parrish said.   

These outstanding audit results ensured that the center’s EMS had successfully transitioned to the new standard and was able to maintain its formal registration. 

“Our audit success is attributable to all of our employees,” said Joe Krouse, the Environmental Management System Division representative directly responsible for the EMS.  “Each and every one was clearly able to talk [the environmental talk] and walk the walk.”  

Parrish explained that as an added bonus, not only is DLA Installation Operations at Richmond the only DLA site to be formally ISO 14001 registered, they are now the only DoD site to maintain their registration to these new strict environmental management requirements.

“An EMS is a documented process for the management of our environmental impact,” he said.  “We have been following this documented system for so long, it’s just become our way of doing business. We are confident that we know and can address our customers’ concerns while continuing the installation’s diverse missions and consistently doing good things for the environment.”
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22819]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 915]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status; Fujitsu Ten Corp. of 
America; (Automotive Audio Products, Electronic Components) Rushville, 
Indiana

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, by an Act of Congress approved June 18, 1934, an Act ``To 
provide for the establishment * * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of 
entry of the United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, 
and for other purposes,'' as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the FTZ Act), 
the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) is authorized to grant to 
qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs ports of entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR Part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved;
    Whereas, an application from the Indianapolis Airport Authority, 
grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 72, for authority to establish special-
purpose subzone status for the automotive audio products and electronic 
components manufacturing plant of Fujitsu Ten Corp. of America, in 
Rushville, Indiana, was filed by the Board on August 19, 1996, and 
notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal Register (FTZ 
Docket 64-96, 61 FR 45399, 8-29-96); and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the application 
is in the public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status at the Fujitsu Ten Corp. of America plant in Rushville, Indiana 
(Subzone 72M), at the location described in the application, subject to 
the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Sec. 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of August 1997.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 97-22819 Filed 8-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Julia ADAMS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Respondent.

No. HH-314.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 14, 1978.

Stephen F. Hanlon of Bay Area Legal Services, Inc., Tampa, for petitioner.

James G. Mahorner, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The prayer of the petition for review is DENIED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., SMITH, J. and BLACK, SUSAN A., Associate Judge, concur.
**CERTIFICATION      OF PERIODIC REPORT**

| (1) | the                Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December                31,                2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or                78o(d));                and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:                March 30, 2007 | /s/                Paul Van Ostenbridge         |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | Paul                Van Ostenbridge             |
|                                 | Chief                Executive Officer          |
|                                 |                                            |
|                                 |                                            |
| Dated:                March 30, 2007 |                                            |
|                                 | /s/                Julie Holland                |
|                                 | Sr.                Vice President and Treasurer |
|                                 |                                            |
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1760 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1760

     To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau of 
  Reclamation within Rogue River Valley Irrigation District or within 
                      Medford Irrigation District.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2005

 Mr. Smith (for himself and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To authorize early repayment of obligations to the Bureau of 
  Reclamation within Rogue River Valley Irrigation District or within 
                      Medford Irrigation District.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Southern Oregon Bureau of 
Reclamation Repayment Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. EARLY REPAYMENT.

    Notwithstanding the provisions of section 213 of the Reclamation 
Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390mm), any landowner within Rogue River 
Valley Irrigation District or within Medford Irrigation District, in 
Oregon, may repay, at any time, the construction costs of the project 
facilities allocated to that landowner's lands within the district in 
question. Upon discharge, in full, of the obligation for repayment of 
the construction costs allocated to all lands the landowner owns in the 
district in question, those lands shall not be subject to the ownership 
and full-cost pricing limitations of the Act of June 17, 1902 (43 
U.S.C. 371 et seq.), and Acts supplemental to and amendatory of that 
Act, including the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390aa et 
seq.).

SEC. 3. LIMITATION.

    Nothing herein modifies contractual rights that may exist between 
Rogue River Valley Irrigation District and Medford Irrigation District 
and the United States under their respective Reclamation contracts, or 
amends or reopens those contracts; nor does it modify any rights, 
obligations or relationships that may exist between the districts and 
their landowners as may be provided or governed by Oregon state law.

SEC. 4. CERTIFICATION.

    Upon the request of a landowner who has repaid, in full, the 
construction costs of the project facilities allocated to that 
landowner's lands owned within the district, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall provide the certification provided for in subsection 
(b)(1) of section 213 of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 
390 mm(b)(1)).
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ronald BRADY.

No. 60916.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 15, 1978.

John M. Lawrence, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

*426William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., William L. Brockman, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000943904
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND V, L.P., SERIES 3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             911,080
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   911,080
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,161,869
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,038,162
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,161,869
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     9,994
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       30,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   293,818
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (314,209)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (314,209)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (314,209)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (17.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Verisity Ltd. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles G. Alvarez, Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |                                                                                            
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 7, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    Charles G. Alvarez                                                                  
|                  |  |  |  | Charles G. Alvarez Vice President of Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.1




SECOND AMENDMENT 
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Second Amendment (the “Amendment”) to that certain Employment Agreement made and entered into effective as of May 20, 2014, and amended October 20, 2014, by and between Sprint Corporation, a Delaware corporation, on behalf of itself and any of its subsidiaries, affiliates and related entities, and John C. Saw (the “Agreement”) is entered into and effective as of July 27, 2015.  Certain capitalized terms shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.


WITNESSETH:


WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the covenants and agreements set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive hereby agree Section 8 of the Agreement shall be amended as shown below:


8.    Place of Performance. In connection with his employment by the Company, the Executive shall be based at the principal executive offices of the Company in the vicinity of Overland Park, Kansas, San Carlos, California, or Bellevue, Washington (the “Place of Performance”), except for travel reasonably required for Company business. Subject to mutual agreement by the Parties, the Executive will relocate the Executive’s residence to the area surrounding the Executive’s specifically-assigned Place of Performance (if not that of Executive’s current residence in Washington state) in accordance with the Company’s relocation policy applicable to senior executives, except that, solely with respect to Executive’s initial relocation to the Overland Park vicinity, the interim living amount and the round-trip return visits to Executive’s former location described in such program shall be replaced with a monthly stipend of $5,420 until the earlier of 12 36 months and the date Executive’s interim living arrangement ends. If the Company relocates the Executive’s Place of Performance more than 50 miles from his Place of Performance prior to such relocation, the Executive shall relocate to a residence within the greater of (a) 50 miles of such relocated Place of Performance or (b) such total miles that do not exceed the total number of miles the Executive commuted to his Place of Performance prior to relocation of the Executive’s Place of Performance. To the extent the Executive relocates his residence as provided in this Section 8, the Company will pay or reimburse the Executive’s relocation expenses in accordance with the Company’s relocation policy applicable to senior executives.
In all other respects, the terms, conditions and provisions of the Agreement shall remain the same.









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be signed by an officer pursuant to the authority of its Board, and the Executive has executed this Amendment, as of the day and year first written above.
	
	
	 SPRINT CORPORATION

	 

	    /s/ Sandra Price

	 By:  Sandra J. Price, 
         Senior Vice President - Human Resources

	 

	 

	 EXECUTIVE

	 

	  /s/ John C. Saw

	 John C. Saw
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22420]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration


Notice of Listing of Members of the Food and Drug 
Administration's Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announces the persons 
who will serve on the FDA Performance Review Board (PRB). This action 
is being taken in accordance with Title 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), which 
requires that members of performance review boards be appointed in a 
manner to ensure consistency, stability, and objectivity in performance 
appraisals, and requires that notice of the appointment of an 
individual to serve as a member be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arlene S. Karr, Office of Human 
Resources and Management Services (HFA-408), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, rm. 7B-32, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-
827-4183.
The following persons will serve on the FDA PRB, which oversees the 
evaluation of performance appraisals of FDA's Senior Executive Service 
(SES) members:
Michael A. Friedman, M.D., Chairperson
Robert J. Byrd
Margaret J. Porter
Sharon Smith Holston
Mary K. Pendergast
William B. Schultz

    Dated: August 14, 1997.
Michael A. Friedman,
Lead Deputy Commissioner for the Food and Drug Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-22420 Filed 8-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
#### Albert B. MUIR, III, Appellant, v. Mary Carol MUIR, Appellee.

No. L-366.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

July 17, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 6, 1969.

Glickstein, Crenshaw, Glickstein, Hulsey & Fay, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Joseph F. Duszlak, Baldwin and Gunnar Miller, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Chavez-Rey v. Chavez-Rey (Fla.App. 1968), 213 So.2d 596; In re Estate of Weymer (Fla.App. 1967), 199 So.2d 495.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.