alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Peter A. KOWALSKI and Julianna Kowalski, Appellants, v. Ben D. WILDER, doing business as Southland Companies, Appellee.

No. 69-728.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 17, 1970.

Rohan & Castello, Miami, for appellants.

Ainslee R. Ferdie, Coral Gables, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants were defendants below in an action brought by the appellee to recover a real estate brokerage commission allegedly owed to the appellee as a result of the appellants’ sale of certain property. A jury trial was had upon the issues framed by the pleadings, and a verdict was rendered in favor of the appellee. Final judgment was entered thereon, and the appellants filed their motion for new trial and motion for judgment n. o. v. Both motions were denied, and the appellant now contends that the court erred in failing to grant them a new trial.

The motion'for new trial is directed to the court’s discretion, and in this case, the record shows that ample and substantial evidence had been submitted to the jury to sustain their finding that the appel-lee was indeed entitled to the brokerage commission he claimed. The defense which had been offered by the appellants at trial was that the listing agreement between sellers-appellants and broker-appellee was incomplete, and that the buyer produced by the broker was not ready, willing and able to buy on terms acceptable to the appellant. Both these defenses presented factual issues for the jury’s resolution, and we see no justification to disturb the jury’s finding.

Therefore, it is our holding that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion when he denied the appellants’ motion for new trial.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 173 (Monday, September 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23726]



[[Page 47209]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 3, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. National City Bancshares, Inc., Evansville, Indiana; to merge 
with Fourth First Bancorp, Inc., Huntingburg, Indiana, and thereby 
indirectly acquire First Bank of Huntingburg, Huntingburg, Indiana.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 3, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-23726 Filed 9-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
#### YARNALL WAREHOUSE AND TRANSFER, INC. v. MAYO.

No. 38464.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 1969.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 1, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 45274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22567]

[[Page 45274]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated April 4, 1997, and published in the Federal 
Register on May 12, 1997, (62 FR 25973), Roberts Laboratories, Inc., 4 
Industrial Way West, Eatontown, New Jersey 07724, made application to 
the Drug Enforcement Administration to be registered as an importer of 
propiram (9649), a basic class of controlled substance listed in 
Schedule I.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of Roberts Laboratories, Inc. to 
import propiram is consistent with the public interest and with United 
States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or 
protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. Therefore, pursuant 
to Section 1008(a) of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act 
and in accordance with Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 
1301.34, the above firm is granted registration as an importer of the 
basic class of controlled substance listed above.

    Dated: July 21, 1997.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-22567 Filed 8-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with amendment no 2 to the annual report on Form 10-K
of Source Interlink Companies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended January
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:


         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



         /s/ S. Leslie Flegel
         -----------------------------------------------------
         Chief Executive Officer


         Dated: March 3, 2004
                ----------------------------------------------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with amendment no 2 to the annual report on Form 10-K
of Source Interlink Companies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended January
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:


         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


         /s/ Marc Fierman
         -----------------------------------------------------
         Chief Executive Officer


         Dated: March 3, 2004
                ----------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Central Jersey Bancorp:

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements  No.
333-100893,  No.  333-122468,  No. 333-125658 and No. 333-144096 on Form S-8 and
No.  333-131640 on Form S-3 of Central Jersey Bancorp of our reports dated March
14, 2008  relating to the  consolidated  statements  of  financial  condition of
Central  Jersey Bancorp and subsidiary as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the
related consolidated statements of income,  shareholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year  period ended December 31, 2007, and the
effectiveness  of internal  control over financial  reporting as of December 31,
2007,  which reports  appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K
of Central Jersey Bancorp.


                                         /s/ KPMG LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
March 14, 2008
NEWS
RELEASE





FOR
RELEASE: IMMEDIATELY





WAYNE
SAVINGS BANCSHARES, INC. DECLARES QUARTERLY DIVIDEND





Wooster, Ohio (March 27, 2008) – Wayne
Savings Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ:WAYN), the stock holding company parent of
Wayne Savings Community Bank, has declared a cash dividend of
$.12  per share on the Company’s common stock for the quarter ending
March 31, 2008.  This represents an annualized dividend of $.48 per
share.  The quarterly cash dividend will be paid on April 23, 2008 to
stockholders of record as of April 9, 2008.





At December 31, 2007, Wayne Savings
Bancshares, Inc. had total assets of $401.0 million, deposits of $323.9 million,
and stockholders’ equity of $34.7 million, or 8.64% of total
assets.





Established
in 1899, Wayne Savings Community Bank, the wholly owned subsidiary of Wayne
Savings Bancshares, Inc., has eleven full-service banking locations in the
communities of Wooster, Ashland, Millersburg, Rittman, Lodi, North Canton, and
Creston, Ohio.








Statements
contained in this news release which are not historical facts may be
forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to
risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially
from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors. Factors which could
result in material variations include, but are not limited to, changes in
interest rates which could affect net interest margins and net interest income,
competitive factors which could affect net interest income and noninterest
income, changes in demand for loans, deposits and other financial services in
the Company's market area; changes in asset quality, general economic conditions
as well as other factors discussed in documents filed by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. The Company undertakes no
obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances that occur after the date on which such statements were
made.





CONTACT
      PERSON:
            H.
      Stewart Fitz Gibbon IIIExecutive
      Vice PresidentChief
      Financial Officer(330)
      264-5767
Order filed, April 24, 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00310

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF A .H AND H.H, CHILDREN , Appellant

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 00516J



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due April 23, 2012 , 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On April 13, 2012, this court granted the court reporters request for extension of time to file the record until April 2 3, 2012. To date, the record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record was not filed within the time prescribed in the first request, the court GRANTS your second request and issue s the following order.We order Eliza Madrigal , the official court reporter, to file the record in this

appeal on or before May 4, 2012

. No further extension will be entertained absent exceptional circumstances

. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Eliza Madrigal does not timely file the record as ordered, the Court may issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file
the record.

PER CUR IAM
# EUR-Lex - 41999D0025 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 41999D0025

**The Schengen acquis - Decision of the Central Group of 22 March 1999 on general principles governing the payment of informers (SCH/C (99) 25) **

*
Official Journal L 239 , 22/09/2000 P. 0420 - 0420 *

DECISION OF THE CENTRAL GROUP

of 22 March 1999

on general principles governing the payment of informers

(SCH/C (99)25)

Informers play a valuable role in the fight against serious cross-border crime, and drug-related crime in particular, since they usually enjoy the trust of the offenders and thus use of such persons affords an opportunity to gain a general picture of the activities of clandestine criminal organisations and structures.

The Working Group on Drugs has addressed this issue under the German Presidency and examined the laws and practices relating to the payment of informers in each Schengen State. Based on the results of this analysis, the Working Group on Drugs has devised common guiding principles for the payment of informers in the form of money or non-material benefits. These general principles are to be regarded as non-binding guidelines in the Schengen area and are intended to contribute to the further enhancement of police and customs cooperation in this sensitive sphere. They are also to serve as a possible guide for those Schengen States currently engaged in drafting or amplifying similar regulations.

The Central Group acknowledges and endorses the - non-binding - "General principles governing the payment of informers" (Doc. SCH/Stup (98)72 Rev 2), subject to approval by the Executive Committee.
255 La. 233

#### Thomas J. THAYER v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 50134.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 12, 1969.

In re: Thomas J. Thayer applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 229 So.2d 767.

The application is denied. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
# DLA Energy Japan holds change of command ceremony 

/ Published June 5, 2018
FORT BELVOIR, Virginia, 
The Defense Logistics Agency Energy Japan bid farewell to Air Force Lt. Col. Kevin Campbell during a change of command ceremony at Yokota Air Base, Japan, May 31. 

Campbell departed for Misawa Air Base, Japan, where he will serve as the commander of the 35th Logistics Readiness Squadron.

“To the men and women of DLA Energy Japan, I can’t thank you enough,” Campbell said. “You are always there at every opportunity; from team building events, to unwavering support for each other and the mission. You are an amazing group of professionals, but you’re an even more amazing team!”

Incoming commander, Air Force Maj. Justin D’Agostino, is the ninth commander since the DLA Energy Japan office opened 24 years ago. He recently served as the operations officer for the Directorate of Logistics, U.S. Forces Korea, Yongsan Army Garrison, Republic of Korea.

During the ceremony, D’Agostino shared his initial reaction to being selected for command. 

“When I found out my family and I were coming to DLA Energy Japan, I was surprised,” he said. “I was surprised because I thought, if I were lucky enough to be selected for a command, I would join a unit with a much smaller sphere of influence and scope of responsibility. When I found out I was to be entrusted with leading the unit responsible for energizing U.S. forces and government agencies throughout Japan, it did not take long for it to dawn on me how awesome of a responsibility this is.”

DLA Pacific Commander Navy Capt. Timothy Daniels presided over the event. He provided D’Agostino words of wisdom as he took command. 

“Justin, as an old ’fuelie‘ my charge to you is simple,” he said. “Continue developing the Energy Japan team by fostering a diverse, innovative and professional workforce. They are vital to you and our collective successes.” 

As D’Agostino begins a new milestone in his life, he said he feels honored to serve with the phenomenal team of DLA Energy Japan. 

“Fueling U.S. forces and other government agencies in Japan is a great responsibility, but as my new team showed me, it’s not a solitary endeavor; it’s a team effort,” he said. “Let us keep the energy supply chain in motion!” 

This is D’Agostino’s first assignment with DLA.
Exhibit 99.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF 

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACTOF 2002 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Adolor Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endingMarch 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Bruce A. Peacock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Bruce A. Peacock 

Bruce A. Peacock
#### Dudley Lewis LEE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-282.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 2, 1970.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and John D. Buchanan, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Foreman v. State, 213 So.2d 754 (Fla.App.1968).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of VillageEDOCS (the "Company") onForm 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that::

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Quarterly Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date:  November 14, 2008                                                    | /s/ K. Mason Conner                  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|           ------------------------- | ------------------------------------ |
|                                                                                  | Chief Executive Officer              |

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BYSECTION 906, OR OTHER DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISEADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSIONOF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TOVILLAGEEDOCS AND WILL BE RETAINED BY VILLAGEEDOCS AND FURNISHED TO THESECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
# L_2016247EN.01001701.xml

| 15.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 247/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 247/17

---

DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2016/1656 OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES

of 7 September 2016

appointing an Advocate-General to the Court of Justice

THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 19 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 253 and 255 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The terms of office of 14 Judges and four Advocates-General of the Court of Justice expired on 6 October 2015. In addition, Council Decision 2013/336/EU (1) increased the number of Advocates-General of the Court of Justice to 11, with effect from 7 October 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The terms of office of 14 Judges and four Advocates-General of the Court of Justice expired on 6 October 2015. In addition, Council Decision 2013/336/EU (1) increased the number of Advocates-General of the Court of Justice to 11, with effect from 7 October 2015.

| (2) | It is on that basis that Mr Evgeni TANCHEV was nominated for the post of Advocate-General of the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is on that basis that Mr Evgeni TANCHEV was nominated for the post of Advocate-General of the Court of Justice.

| (3) | The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on the suitability of Mr Evgeni TANCHEV to perform the duties of Advocate-General of the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on the suitability of Mr Evgeni TANCHEV to perform the duties of Advocate-General of the Court of Justice.

| (4) | Mr Evgeni TANCHEV should therefore be appointed for the period from the date of entry into force of this Decision to 6 October 2021, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Mr Evgeni TANCHEV should therefore be appointed for the period from the date of entry into force of this Decision to 6 October 2021,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Evgeni TANCHEV is hereby appointed an Advocate-General of the Court of Justice for the period from the date of entry into force of this Decision to 6 October 2021.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 7 September 2016.

The President

P. JAVORČÍK

---

(1)  Council Decision 2013/336/EU of 25 June 2013 increasing the number of Advocates-General of the Court of Justice of the European Union (OJ L 179, 29.6.2013, p. 92).

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Russell K. Girling, Chief Financial Officer of TC PipeLines GP, Inc., the general partner of TC PipeLines, LP (the Partnership), in compliance
with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, in connection with the Partnership's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) on the date hereof, that:



|                      |  | /s/ Russell K. Girling                                                                                  
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 6, 2004 |  | Russell K. Girling
Chief Financial Officer
TC PipeLines GP, Inc., as general partner of
TC PipeLines, LP

---



QuickLinks