April 20, 2015

Exemption No. 11397 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–0144

Mr. Christopher G. Rice

President and Founder Colorado Cartographics, LLC

9685 West 36 th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033

Dear Mr. Rice:

This letter is to inform you that we have gran ted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you th e conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated January 20, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Colorado Cartographics, LLC (her einafter petitioner or operator) for an exemption. The exemption would allow the petiti oner to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct geospatial, surveying, and geosciences services.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA describing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the peti tioner are the DJI F550 Flam ewheel and a Tarot T810.2

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates . In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112

− 95 in reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, a nd limited operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation, the S ecretary of Transportation has de termined that this aircraft meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, th e FAA finds that the re quested relief from 14 CFR part 21, Certification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H—Airworthiness Certificates , and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is
not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial da ta collection. The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all materi al respects to those pr esented in your petition. In Grants of Exemption No s. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial ( see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC ( see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. ( see Docket No.

FAA

− 2014

− 0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifica tions described by the petition er and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of signi ficantly greater proporti ons, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gi ves the FAA good cause to find th at the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for re questing an exemption, I find that—

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously re quested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213 also apply to the situ ation you present; and

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a gr ant of exemption is in the public interest. Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S. C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, Colora do Cartographics, LLC is granted an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e )(4) and (5), 61.113( a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405( a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1 ) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow the pe titioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection. This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitati ons listed below.3

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Colorado Cartogr aphics, LLC is hereafter referred to as the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions an d limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI F550 Flamewheel and a Tarot T810 when weighi ng less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are not permitted.

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine compliance with the 87 knot speed restricti on. In no case will the UA be operated at airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level (AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical certificate or

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PI C and VO at all times. The VO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times; electronic messaging or texting is not perm itted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. The PIC must en sure that the VO can perform the duties required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepa ncy exists between the conditions and4

limitations in this exemption and the pro cedures outlined in the operating documents,

the conditions and limitations herein ta ke precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the pr ocedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revi se its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and pr esent updated and revised documents to the Administrator or any la w enforcement official upon request. The operator must also present updated and revise d documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS

− 80) may be contacted if questi ons arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that aff ect the UAS operation or flight characteristics, e .g. replacement of a flight cr itical component, must undergo a functional test flight prio r to conducting further opera tions under this exemption. Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at least 500 feet from other people. The functi onal test flight must be conducted in such a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the UAS is in a condition for safe flight. Th e pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e .g. inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manu facturer’s maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exempti on must comply with all manufacturer safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC mu st hold either an airline transport, commercial, private, recreational, or sport pi lot certificate. The PIC must also hold a

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a state, the District of Colombia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PI C is rated on his or her pilot certificate.5

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to ope rate unless the PIC demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a ma nner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distan ces from persons, vessels, vehi cles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with 14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs (training, proficiency, and e xperience-building) and determining the PIC’s ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, training operations may only be conducted dur ing dedicated training sessions. During training, proficiency, and expe rience-building flights, al l persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonpartic ipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparti cipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditi ons (VMC). Flights under special visual flight rule s (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical mile s of an airport reference point (ARP) as denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facil ity Directory (AFD) or for airports not denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current FAA-published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption holder. The letter of agreement with the ai rport management must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the UA must return to a pre-determined location within the pr ivate or controlled-access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the even t of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a f light unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the intended operation and to operate after that fo r at least five minutes or with the reserve power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Author ization (COA). All operations shall be conducted in accorda nce with an ATO-issued COA. The exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct operations that cannot be conducted unde r the terms of the attached COA.6

22. All aircraft operated in accord ance with this exemption must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N

− Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure th e safe operation and flight of the UAS and any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the

PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. These

documents must be made available to th e Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give wa y to all manned aviation operations and

activities at all times.

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently pr otect nonparticipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety of nonparticipating persons; and

b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or struct ures has granted permission for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or es sential persons are not considered nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over priv ate or controlled-access property with permission from the property owner/cont roller or authorized representative. Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS

− 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Sa fety Board (NTSB) per instructions

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

.7

If this exemption permits operations for th e purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM)

as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction ove r the area of proposed filming. The 3-day notification may be waived w ith the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phone number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of the person res ponsible for the on-s cene operation of the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N

− Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PI Cs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtain ed permission from property owners

and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those who gave permission must be made av ailable to the inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holde r or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, includi ng maps or diagrams of any area, city, town, county, and/or state over which film ing will be conducted and the altitudes essential to accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer th an 500 feet from pa rticipating persons consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the exemption holder’s MPTOM.8

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS operations must comply with al l applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.

This exemption terminates on April 30, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight St andards ServicePage 1 of 15

20 January 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Exemption Request

Re: Petition for Exemption (14 CFR § 11.81) by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) for the usage of Small

, Unmanned Aerial Systems (“ sUAS ”) for scientific research, air quality monitoring, and geospatial applications.

Dear Sir or Madam,

I, Christopher Rice, President and Founder of Colorado Cartographics, LLC (“CCL”) , a consulting firm located in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, am petitioning to be granted exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FAR”) listed in Section II of this document

. It is my

intention to be compliant with the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Pub lic Law

112

- 95, Sections 331

- 334 (“The Act”)

, and operate sUAS solely for the purposes defined in

Section III of this document.

CCL is a consulting firm that provides geospatial, surveying, and geosciences services to a wide range of industries in the United States. The company leverages the capacities of mapping software, GPS systems, and surveying equipment to provide these services to industries that r ely on them for regula tory compliance, public safety, and asset management. Being positioned in this highly competitive industry requires a significant investment in the aforementioned software

and hardware p roducts , but to also be aware of forthcoming technological developments. The

sUAS is among a group of several technological developments that CCL considers to be a tool

that will have a positive impact on the way we perform data collection, photogrammetry

, air quality monitoring, and visual document ation methodologies , all of wh ich are services we provide for our customers.

Section I. Petitioner Contact Information

Christopher G. Rice Colorado Cartographics LLC

9685 W. 36 th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033

Business: (303) 990

- 7900

Email: chris.rice@colocarto.com Company Website: http://www.colocarto.com

FEIN: 27

- 3129257Page 2 of 15

Section II. The s pecific Sections of Title 14 CFR that CCL wishes to seek e xemption:

1. Chapter 1, Subchapter C, Part 21, Subpart H

2. Chapter 1, Subchapter C, Part 45, § 45.23 (a)

3. Chapter 1, Subchapter D, Part 61, § 61.113(a)

4. Chapter 1, Subchapter D, Part 91, §91.7 (a)

5. Chapter 1, Subchapter D, Part 91, § 91.111(a)

6. Chapter 1, Subchapter D, Part 91, § 91.119(d)

7. Chapter 1, Subchapter D, Part 91, § 91.121

Section III. Extent of re lief and r easons CCL is requesting relief from existing regulations

.

CCL is requesting relief from the aforementioned Title 14 CFR regulations so it may engage in

sUAS operations for the advancement of applied technologies that will benefit both the company, customers, and the scientific and geospatial community

. The extent by which CCL seeks relief is exclusive for the applications listed below:

 Photogrammetry Applications : By using fixed, downward

- facing camera s
, photogrammetry enables c re ation of overlapped aerial images for use in geospatial

software (GIS) , ground

- trut hing, and visual documentation

. CCL is presently able to process aerial imagery, and strives to provide rapid delivery of high

- resolution ortho

rectified images for clients requesting these products. The a dvantages of using sUAS versus manned aircraft are: significant cost reduction , safety considerations , and imaging

from lower altitudes below current regul ations (Appendix A, Figure 1).

 Light Detection and Ranging ( “ LiDAR ” ): This technology is used for generating high

resolution surface models of land topography, c ivic features, and building interiors. Commonly , LiDAR systems are attached to a manned heli copter or a fixed

- wing aircraft, however, some manufacturers are rapidly developing lightweight units designed for

sUAS

. D eploying sUAS with LiDAR capability reduces costs greatly, benefiting all

stakeholders. CCL is planning to use LiDAR systems onboard s UAS to generate topographical surfaces of mining sites, reclamation ar eas, and land development

locations. LiDAR also aids in calculating volumetric analysis for waste pile removal

, Earth

- moving cost evaluation , and slope severity studies ( Appendix A, Figure 2 .)

.

 Infrared (“IR”) and Thermal Imaging: Both technologies detect surface features at frequencies beyond the visual spectrum, enabling advanced data visualization for a wide range of industries. Examples of IR imaging include: vegetative analysis and chemical spi ll identification. T hermal imaging examples include: surface heat signature , heat loss, pipeline conditional assessments, a nd efficiency studies of building structures and

residences . IR and thermal imaging sensors fitte d to sUAS benefit from low flight costs, flight precision, and rapid data acquisition. CCL has yet to acquire an IR/thermal imaging

apparat us, but we a re planning to prototype thermal imaging for our energy customers who have expressed an interest in checking midstream pipelines for potential leaks and/orPage 3 of 15

valve gasket failures. The costs associated with thermal and IR sensing equ ipment are

p rohibitive

, yet funding by potential investors or corporate research grants would assist in fulfilling these valu able researc h methods for our sUAS fleet.

 Air Quality Monitoring: In an effort to assist energy companies with environmental compliance, it is our intention to utilize the sUAS for fixed

- interval m ethane monitoring

at fixed altit udes ranging from 25’

- 200’ Above Ground Level (“AGL”) near natural gas separation, flaring , and compressor sites. Using sophisticated monitoring equipment designed for sUAS payloads, coupled with onboard telemetry , we will be able to gather

this data while the sUAS is airborne. Together with o nboard GPS , the monitoring system logs position s of air quality sample s, providing a geospatial component for map creation,

and interpretation. CCL is currently collaborating with a natural gas company

, researching and designing a mobile monitoring system for sUAS that is portable, lightweight , and communicates with onboard telemetry systems for real

- time data acquisition.

Section IV. How CCL’s Exemption Reques t will benefit the Public as a w hole.

The sUAS platform provides a significant benefit to industries that create advantages for deployment of tech nologies listed in Section III , and the consequent benefits to the Public are

listed below:

 A direct result of a sUAS ’s ability to provide a much more affordable alternative to manned vehicle operations is ultimatel y a lower cost to end consumers , especially if the organization cannot absorb s uch costs . The economic benefits of operating sUAS versus the combined costs of operating a helicopter or fixed

- wing aircraft are significant for

these reasons:

1. Aircraft/

p ilot /air traffic co ntrol costs can be prohibitively expensive, and the FAR

altitude restrictions (14 CFR § 91.119) may affect value of resulting product,

2. Fuel surcharge fluctuations passed on to organizations hiring aircraft services,

3. Fossil fuel emissions as a result of operating manned aircraft versus electric

powered sUAS

, 4. Decreased noise pollution,

5. Fewer or nonexistent innate d angers due to catastrophic manned aircraft failures resulting in death, damage to property, and potential legal disputes,

6. Job creatio n.

 A sUAS ’s ability to operate in conditions and airspace where manned aircraft are limited

or forbidden provides growth in areas where human interests and public health concerns

exist. One such example of this application is the natural gas industry

, which CC L currently provides many services for . As exploration and production operations encroach

on human population areas, issues concerning air quality arise

. The implementation of

sUAS fitted with air quality monitoring s ensors (or ground sensing equipment) enables accurate samples to further the mitigation process. The low costs resulting from sUASPage 4 of 15

operation greatly increase the interval time between flights , resulting in higher aggregation of relevant stud y data over time periods where short times betw een acquisition is fundamental.

 A secondary goal of CCL’s exemption is to develop awareness of sUAS capabilities for the geospatial industry, but also for local communities in Colorado. The issues surrounding sUAS usage range from privacy and civil rights, to illegal usage in Na tional

Parks . In an effort to communicate awareness of the importance of sUAS introduction into our communities, CCL is working alongside community leaders and public institutions (local libraries, schools, and community centers) to educat e the public, ass ist with clarifying sUAS guidelines and restrictions, and communicate potential future applications. Lastly, CCL is an advocate for campaigns such as “Know Before You Fly”, to spread the message about sUAS restrictions and safety. Our number one goal is to foster a sense of safety but also provide an open dialogue regarding this rapidly developing technology.

Section V. Reasons why CCL’s exemption will not adversely affect s afety , or how the

e xem ption would provide a level o f s afety at least equal to the existing r ule

.

It is CCL’s intention to add sUAS capabilities to its portfolio of products and services for its existing and future customers . The four applications outlined in Section III are tailored for

industries where risk of human intervention and damage to property are low to nonexistent. In

our current areas of interest , we are fortunate to have low population densities , and a trace amount of civil infrastructure and public and private services ( i.e. hospitals, hotels, residential subdivisions). Ou r flight areas encompass an area no larger than 1⁄2 of a square mile maximum, limiting any chances of posing additional risks other than on es beyond our control.

C CL has a ggregated a pproximately 100 hours building, testing, and familiarizing ourselves with the flight characteristics of our prototype sUAS fleet, and we fully understand and recognize

their capabilities and deficiencies . Furthermore, we have evaluated each units’ flight envelope limits, mimicked mid

- flight failures, and are in the process of testing parachute deployment to safely return a failed sUAS to the ground in the event of a system failure.

CCL ’s sUAS Fleet Specifications

CCL’s fleet of two (2) prototype sUAS consist of the following characteristics that illustrate their minimal impact to human beings , manned aircraft, and infrastructure:

1. DJI F550 Flamewheel Multi

- rotor (6

- propeller hexagonal frame , plastic/metals ) :

 Total weight with maximum allowable payload: 6.5lbs,

 Dimensions: Greatest width: 550mm (21.65in), Height (with landing gear): 10.5”

 Maximum speed: 30kts

 Battery system (4

- cell, 14.8 volt, 4000maH lithium

- polymer) provides eight (8) to tw elve (12) minutes of flight time, and one (1) minute of reserve for RTH function if necessary,Page 5 of 15

 NAZA

- M V2 Flight Controller (with GPS and compass) is installed on this sUAS , and is the most advanced system currently available, with latest firmware release,

 Use of First

- Person View (“FPV”) for advanced flight safety; provides real

- time video

downlink from sUAS to video monitor on transmitter.

2. Tarot T810 Foldable Multi

- rotor (6

- propeller hexagonal frame, carbon fiber):

 Total weight with maximum allowable paylo ad: 9.3lbs,

 Dimensions: Greatest width: 810mm (31.9in), Height (with landing gear): 14.25”

 Maximum speed: 30kts

 Battery system (2x 6

- cell, 22.2 volt, 5000maH lithium

- polymer) provides fifteen (15) minutes of flight time, and two (2) minutes of reserve flig ht time,

 NAZA

- M V2 Flight Controller is also installed on this unit,

 Use of First

- Person View (“FPV”) for advanced flight safety; provides real

- time video

downlink from sUAS to video monitor on transmitter.

Flight Control

ler and Fail

- Safe s ystems

The existing flight control technolo gy that CCL utilizes is the DJI NAZA

- M V2 Flight Controller, which provides these safety features:

 GPS Attitude Control: Prior to flight operation, the GPS recor ds latitude and longitude, and that position become s the origin of flight. Once airborne , the GPS holds the sUAS in

this position, and does not de viate from it , unless the mode is changed by the operator. This level of safety safeguards the sUAS , preventing it from drifting away, and posing a potential risk of injury or damage to property.

 Attitude Control: The flight controller disables the GPS, and allows operator to control

the sUAS in a manner consistent with manual flight. The onboard stability systems keep

sUAS horizontally stabilized , to prevent erratic flight performance.

 Return

- to

- Home (“RTH”): If the operator, under any circumstances, deems the operation of the sUAS to become a risk to persons, property, or the sUAS itself, the RTH

command may be invoked, safely return ing the sUAS to the origin of flight , s ubsequently landing and powering down autonomously. This feature is a design protocol that allows the operator to dismiss operation in the event of his or her inability to control the sUAS

, as in with an emergency situation.

Inherent r isks of o

perating a sUAS

CCL assumes there is risk involved with operating a sUAS . As with any a ircraft , manned, or unmanned, unforeseen circumstances beyond the pilot ’ s control do exist

. However

, p roper safety protocols, regularly

- scheduled maintenance, and continuous pilot training are essential to

minimize these r isks. Below are three identified risks that exist that apply to all multi

- rotor
sUASs , and may lead to failures beyond the Flight Controller’ s ability to assist in safe recovery and landing:Page 6 of 15

 Physical Failures. In the event of a physical failure, an example being a failed propeller

or breach of the sUAS frame ’s capacity to support normal flight , the NAZA

- M V2 flight

controller may have limited ability to stabilize the sUAS , result ing in ground impact. This

unfortunate occurrence is an innate risk, and must be addressed for safety considerations.

 Electrical Faults. This type of failure p ose s a risk to normal sUAS flight, and may result

in sUAS instability and potential ground impacts. Electrical faults may originate in the battery system, receiver, flight controller, flight motors , GPS, or the speed controller

units

.

 Wildlife. In the unlikely event of wildlife strikes, or aggressive wildlife encounters, the

sUAS flight characteristics may be severely compromised, resulting in ground impact, property damage, or injury to persons. T he aforementioned sUAS p arachute system is a fail

- safe method for safely returning a sUAS to the ground, and is highly recommended to ensure safe recovery of sUAS and promotes safe operation.

Radio Control and Telemetry Equipment u sed on CCL sUAS Fleet

CCL’s fleet of sUAS multi

- r otors are controlled remotely by a Spektrum Dx8, an 8

- channel,

2.4GHz transmitter. The FPV systems employ the BosCam 5.8GHz transmitter/receiver

combination and a 7” TFT display monitor with a sun hood affixed to the Spektrum transmitter. The usage of a GoPro Hero 4+ enthusiast video camera will be used on the Tarot T810 for higher

- resolution FPV video feed.

CCL’s Commitment to Safety and Regulatory Compliance

It is CCL’s intention to be in full compliance with the statutes set forth by The Act , if an exemption is granted. When the additional Certificate of Authorization (“COA”) process is completed thereafter, CCL will be able to operate sUAS in a commercial manner. After all licensing is complete , CCL will enforce a strict set of procedures th at will:

 Ensure that each pre

- flight checklist is completed before flight operations begin,

 Equip sUAS with flightworthy components and ensure all required spare parts are immediately avail able, along with proper tools, batteries, charge rs, and associ ated equipment is always on site at each flight location

,

 Ensure sUAS manufacturer notifications regarding operational safety and any additional known issues that may affect flight performance are resolved prior to any flight operation, otherwise sUAS will re main grounded,

 Confirm communication between the sUAS and the Flight Transmitter / FPV system is fully functional before any flight operation begins

,Page 7 of 15

 Ensure GPS systems are in full working order and an acceptable level of GPS satellite acquisition is ach ieved before any flight operation begins

,

 If applicable, confirm DJI PC Ground Station flight routine is loaded, and test flights record successful launch, route, and completion,

 Calibrate altimeters using DJI PC Ground Station to the study site’s maximum altitude,

and limit sUAS altitude to 3 00’ AGL to avoid flight outside of this envelope.

 E nsure a minimum of five (5) miles from any airport exists from closest edge of flight plan area. ( Figure 3 , Appendix A )

, and maintain a distance of 500’ minimum from people, vehicles, and property.

 If utilizing the PC Ground Station Waypoint Manager, enable the No Waypoint Zones map, which disables positioning of waypoints within five (5) mil es of a major airports (Figure 4 , Appendix A)

 Never exceed visual line

- of

- sight di stance (VLOS) during flight operations, and set a timer for five (5) minutes at beginning of flight operation, to remind pilot about remaining battery life , and always have a trained spotter not operating the sUAS

accomp any the pilot,

 Display (if necessary) signage/warning beacons/traffic cones if sUAS usage in close proximity to public right

- of

- way,

 Be aware of air traffic conditions in the immediate area, by observing existing aircraft flight patterns, changes in wind direction and intensity, and consultation of consumer

grade a viation tracking applications (e.g. FlightRadar24), if necessary,

 Be aware of changing weather conditions that may affect overall flight performance and

line

- of

- sight visibility of sUAS , and al ways err on the side of caution by grounding sUAS

if conditions are likely to worsen,

 Properly adhere to post

- flight guidelines, which include: disconnection of circuitry that

could result in user injury, storage o f all components in proper containers, checking area for any components left behind , and securing any gates at exit from private property

,

 Communicate completion of flight operation s to constituent s, stakeholders, or customers.

 Have in our possession all documentation pertaining to the FAR Exemption, including licenses, medical cards, if applicable.

 Comply with any additional and future regulations enforced by the FAA FAR.Page 8 of 15

Section VI. Federal Register Rulemaking , CCL r easoning for E xemption.

1. Title 14, CFR 21: Certification Procedures for Products and Parts Subpart H,

Air worthiness Certificates ( §21.171

- §21.199).

Section 333 of The Act states:

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft syst ems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, speed, operational capability, proximity to airports and popula ted areas, and operation

within visual line of sight do not create a hazard to users o f the national airspace system

or the public or pose a threat to national security; and

,

(2) whether a certificate of waiver , certificate of authorization, or airworthiness

certificati on under section 44704 of T itle 49, United States Code, is required for the

ope ration of unmanned aircraft systems identified under paragraph (1).

Reason for Exemption: The operational characteristics of CCL’s sUAS fleet, which consist of

small size and weight, low speed , a limited geographical extent, together with CCL’s comp liance with airport and populated area proximity rules, meet the level of safety compliance proposed by Section 333. Paragraph (2) states that if sUAS meet this requirement, exemption from 14 CFR 21, Subpart H may be granted.

2. Title 14, CFR § 45.23 (a )

, ( b ) : Display of Marks, General

(a) Each operator of an aircraft must display on that aircraft marks consisting of the Roman capital letter “N” (denoting United States registration) followed by the registration number of the aircraft. Each suffix letter used in the marks displayed must also be a Roman capital letter.

(b) When marks include only the Roman capital letter “N” and the registration number is displayed on limited, restricted or light

- sport category aircraft or experimental or provisionally certific ated aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraft near each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 inches high, the words “limited,” “restricted,” “light

- sport,” “experimental,” or

“ provisional,” as applicable.

Reason for Exemption : (a): CCL ’ s sUAS surface areas prevent attachment of a distinguishable registration number greater than 2” in height (applicable only to § 45.23b) from a distance equal or greater than 40 feet, unless the usage of optical magnification is employed. The addition of a flag or equivalent surface by which registration number must be visible may inhibit usage of

sUAS due to the additional payload weight and potential surface area, which may result in flight instability and/or failure. (b): The classification of sUAS under the current regulatory restriction period is unclear, therefore, this exemption shall remain active

.Page 9 of 15

3. Title 14 CFR § 61.113 (a) : Private Pilot Privileges and Li mit ations

(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) through (h) of this section, no person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as pilot in command of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or h ire; nor may that person, for compensation or hire, act as pilot in command of an aircraft.

Reason for Exemption : Due to the nature of sUAS being unmanned, it is not possible to carry passengers. However, property assets for the purposes of scientific research and photogrammetry

will consist of the sUAS payload, and the company ’s pilot in command (sUAS operator) will be compensated for expertise, services, and deliverables as a result of operating the sUAS

.

4. Title 14 CFR § 91.7(a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness

(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition.

Reason for Exemption : The aforementioned 14 CFR 21 Subpart H exemption from requiring

airworthiness certificates for sUAS is the reason for this exemption.

5. Title 14 CFR § 91.111 (a): Operat ion near other aircraft

( a) No person may operate an aircraft so close to another aircraft as to create a collision

hazard.

R eason for Exemption : Occasionally, sUAS engage in simultaneous flight routines that employ

more th an one (1) sUAS in a tightly controlled, patterned flight plan based on onboard GPS positioning navigation systems. This method of data collection employs interferometric capture sequences, requiring more than one measurement sensor during the flight routi ne.

6. Title 14 CFR § 91.119(d): Minimum Safe Altitudes

(d) Helicopters, powered parachutes, an d weight

- shift

- control aircraft: If the operation is conducted without hazard to per sons or property on the surface, a helicopter may be operated at less than the minimums prescribed in paragraph (b

– 1000’) or (c

– 500’ ) of this section, provided each person operating the helicopter complies with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the FAA.

Reason for Exemption : Given that sUAS operators must obey a maximum of 3 00’ AGL, and

below the 500’ restriction for manned aircraft in non

- congested areas, this exemption applies to the routes and altitudes for helicopters specifically, as research areas and areas of interest (AOIs) may exist within these corridors. Additional research on the location of these helicopter

- specific flight c orridors will be conducted before any flight operations commence.Page 10 of 15

7. Title 14 CFR § 91.121: Altimeter Settings

(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating

... [remainder of Regulation].

Reason for Exemption : sUAS altimeter settings are c ont rolled by the onboard altimeter (GPS

based), or supplemental barometric altimeter for use as a backup and/or altitude validation unit. Additionally, “cruising altitude’ does not apply to sUAS within CCL’s operational capacities,

unless this term is used to describe the altitude by which the actions stated in Section III are

considered as such.

Section VII. Additional Information, Views, or Arguments.

Personal Statement

In conclusion, CLL agrees with the FAA’s heightened awareness of the issues surrounding the widespread usage of sUAS in the United States. It is an obvious problem with potentially serious consequences if sUAS are operated irresponsibly . Our company is committed to not only fully understanding and abiding by the laws surrounding the usage of sUAS, but to also be an advocate for others to comply with the rules and regulations that exist for the safety of U.S.

citizens.

In the scientific and geospatial community, there are numerous applied technologies that

influence how research is conducted. These broad industries are consistently on the forefront of the latest and greatest advancements, and in most cases, is the basis of their origin. Remove this ability

, and the result is a slowdown of economic growth, fundamental to sustainabili ty . This is the reason why we at CCL believe that the sUAS and its associated benefits are so relevant to the advancement of human development, whether it is to assist farmers with increasing crop yields, or mitigating health risks to thousands of people

, its one small step in a long

, legislative process

that will ultimately benefit us all.

CLL appreciates the opportunity to be able to petition for this exemption, and is fortunate to have the right to do so. The other members of the sUAS community who are passionate about the ability to operate sUAS in the National Airspace System are all advocates for safety and responsibility. CCL is honored to be a part of such a group that sees the long

- term benefits of creating sUAS compliance and control, and we great ly appreciate the efforts of the FAA, its Director, and Administrators.

Section VIII. Exemption Outside the United States.

CCL has no intention to operate a sUAS outside the United States.Page 11 of 15

To the Director and Administration of the Federal Aviation Administration, I hereby submit this Petition for Exemption, dated January 20, 2015.

Respectfully,

Christopher Rice, President Colorado Cartographics LLC