alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,312
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,101
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     23,236
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             561
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               608
<LOANS>                                        287,360
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,557
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 326,613
<DEPOSITS>                                     259,074
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,435
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,669
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,435
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 326,613
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 23,040
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,779
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   649
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                25,468
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,841
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,863
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,605
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      180
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,419
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,399
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,399
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.32
<LOANS-NON>                                        517
<LOANS-PAST>                                       721
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,376
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,557
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,557
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6904

JAMES WILLIAM MORRIS, JR.,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

ROBERT M. STEVENSON, III, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District 

Judge. (9:10-cv-02299-JFA)

Submitted: October 13, 2011 Decided: October 18, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James William Morris, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald John 

Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James William Morris, Jr., seeks to appeal the 

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Morris has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
TOWN OF RIVERHEAD 

Office of the Town Supervisor 

200 HOWELL AVENUE, RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 11901-2596 

(631) 727-3200 

June 21, 2010 

M-30 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Room W12-140 

West Building Ground Floor 

Washington, D.C. 20590-0001 

Re: Docket Number FAA-2010-0302 

- - I 

Dear Sir/Madam: 

I write to you with deep concern regarding the proposed amendments to Chapter I of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (Part 93). 

As the Town Supervisor in the Town of Riverhead, I have received a myriad of 

complaints and personally experienced noise disturbance caused by low-flying helicopters on a 

frequent basis, particularly on weekend afternoons. 

I respectfully propose that two separate routes be designated for helicopter use for the 

purpose of alleviating concentrated air traffic congestion. 

Specifically, one route would traverse the North Shore water route and another would 

traverse the South Shore water route. In addition, each route should equally share helicopter 

traffic. 

Either way, both the North Shore and the South Shore Route should require helicopters to 

fly at a minimum of 3000 feet and one mile from shore. 

Routes over any Long Island North Shore community should be diverted over the water 

by flying around Orient Point, around Plum Island and through Plum Gut to reach their 

destination and those helicopters using the southern route should approach their respective 

airports or landing areas traversing the least densely-populated areas from the south. 

While I am mindful that helicopters will continue to operate in the skies over Long 

Island, it is my hope that in the end the contemplated amendments demonstrate fairness and 

practicality by diverting helicopter traffic in a manner that minimizes noise disturbance over 

populated areas. 

I am. 

Sincerely yours, 

Sean M. Walter 

Riverhead Town Supervisor
# Distribution headquarters celebrates the 242nd Army birthday

/ Published June 20, 2017
NEW CUMBERLAND, Pennsylvania, In a ceremony held in the DLA Distribution Headquarters auditorium, senior leaders, military members and civilian staff celebrated the U.S. Army’s 242nd Birthday on June 14, 2017.  Distribution’s chief of staff, Perry Knight spoke about the significance and history of the day.
“Today we pause to remember the soldiers who have fought in every war or engagement on every continent, since our fight for independence in 1775 and to recognize those who now serve and have given another year of sacrifice and service to our country,” said Knight.

On June 14, 1775, Congress adopted the American Continental Army, raising 10 companies of riflemen, approving an enlistment form, and appointing a committee to draft rules and regulations. The following day, George Washington was unanimously chosen as the commander of all continental forces.

With several distribution centers co-located with Army customers, DLA Distribution provides the right things, at the right place, at the right time to Army customers. DLA Distribution Anniston, Ala., DLA Distribution Corpus Christi, Texas, DLA Distribution Tobyhanna, Pa. and DLA Distribution Red River, Texas, are all collocated with Army, with a total of 118,000 national stock numbers, $35 billion in inventory and 690,000 lines received/issued at these collocated sites.  

“The essence of America’s Army then as now remains, sacrifice, courage, duty and character – achieving victory and protecting our Nation,” said Knight. “I am confident these will persevere. In 1775 they were our roots, tomorrow they will be our legacy.”
# Distribution Staff Sergeant named Carlisle Barracks NCO of the Year

/ Published Nov. 15, 2018
CARLISLE BARRACKS, Pa. , 
Army Staff Sgt. Brittany M. Sheehan, operations noncommissioned officer, Aerial Delivery Textile Division, DLA Distribution Susquehanna, Pennsylvania, is the 2018 United States Army War College Non Commissioned Officer of the Year.

To compete, Sheehan had to face a board of senior enlisted personnel who asked questions covering first aid, Equal Opportunity policy, Medal of Honor Recipients, Army uniform, and current events.

“Going in, I never feel like I've prepped enough. I feel like I could study non-stop and it still isn't good enough, but being selected feels amazing, and, I had no idea that I was the first female from DDSP to accomplish this,” she said.

Sgt. 1st Class Miguel A. Trevino, noncommissioned officer in charge, Aerial Delivery Textile Division, DDSP, helped Sheehan study and prepare for the board. However, during her board prep phase, he departed for school, so Sgt. 1st Class Franz E. Tovar stepped in. He helped Sheehan get her uniform together prior to her board appearance.  

“From my prior NCO of the Year experiences here in this unit, the challenge to get prepared for such a prestigious board is big,” said Tovar. 

According to Tovar, the biggest challenge that NCOs here in the DLA encounter during the preparation process, is trying to find time to study and rehearse due to the soldier's primary and secondary duties – mission first, civilian schooling, military schools, and community services.

“I'm sure she had to sacrifice a lot of her spare time to get ready.  Personally, I believe that this type of action speaks loudly of how professional and dedicated Staff Sgt. Sheehan is,” Tovar stated.  

Sheehan encourages soldiers to compete because these types of boards and competitions only makes one a better soldier.

The biggest piece of advice she gives – relax. 

“I know from experience, it is easier said than done. You don't want to be your own downfall during the boards especially when you're stuttering over your words and your voice is shaky because of how nervous you are. As long as you've studied and show confidence, all should be fine.”

Winning this competition brings Sheehan closer to the next one.  She will compete next summer at the United States Army Training and Doctrine Command competition.  She is also slated to attend the Pathfinder school in April of 2019.

“My immediate career goals are to obviously keep climbing the ladder and moving forward while completing college courses,” said Sheehan, adding, “But my over-all long term goal is to make the rank of Sergeant Major.”
MOODY NATIONAL REIT I, INC. 10-Q




Exhibit 10.3





Assignment and Assumption of Agreement
of Purchase and Sale


 


This Assignment and Assumption of Agreement
of Purchase and Sale (“Assignment”) is entered into between Moody National REIT I, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Assignor”),
and Moody National REIT II, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Assignee”), as of September 25, 2015 (“Effective Date”).


 


RECITALS


 


A.            Pursuant
to the terms of that certain Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated May 11, 2015 by and between Mueller Hospitality, LP, a Texas
limited partnership (“Seller”), as seller, and Assignor, as buyer, as amended, modified and supplemented (the “Purchase
Agreement”), Assignor agreed to acquire the Property (as such term is defined in the Purchase Agreement) located at 1200
Barbara Jordan Boulevard, Building 4, Austin, Travis
County, Texas.


 


B.            Assignor desires to assign Assignor’s
rights and interests in the Purchase Agreement to Assignee, and Assignee wishes to assume all of Assignors rights and interests
in the Contract.


 


C.            The Parties desire to enter into this
Assignment to, among other things, assign the Assignor’s rights and interests in the Purchase Agreement to Assignee and to
evidence Assignee’s assumption of Assignor’s obligations and liabilities under the Purchase Agreement.


 


ASSIGNMENT


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


1.             Assignment of Contract. Assignor
hereby assigns and transfers its interest in the Purchase Agreement to Assignee. This Assignment does not release Assignor of liability
under the Purchase Agreement.


 


2.             Assumption. Assignee hereby acknowledges
and agrees to all of the terms of the Purchase Agreement and accepts the foregoing assignment and assumes and agrees to perform
all obligations of Assignor under the Purchase Agreement, in accordance with the terms thereof.


 


3.             Counterparts; Facsimile Signatures.
This Assignment may be executed in multiple counterparts which, when combined together, shall constitute an original of this Assignment.
In addition, facsimile signatures of the parties shall be effective on all counterparts of this Assignment.


 


[Signature Page to Follow]


 





    	 



    	 



    




Executed as of the date set forth above.


 





	 	ASSIGNOR:
	 	 	 
	 	Moody National REIT I, Inc., a Maryland
corporation
	 	 	 
	 	By:	
	 	Name:	Brett C. Moody
	 	Title:	CEO
	 	 	 
	 	ASSIGNEE:
	 	 	 
	 	Moody National REIT II, Inc., a Maryland
corporation
	 	 	 
	 	By:	
	 	Name:	Brett C. Moody
	 	Title:	CEO
Exhibit




FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, Amtech Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) and Jong S. Whang (“Executive”) entered into a Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated February 9, 2012 (as amended, restated, supplemented or modified, the “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive now desire to further modify the Agreement pursuant to Paragraph 20 thereof, and to enter into this Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement (“Fifth Amendment”).
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree to the following modification to the Agreement, to be effective as of the date set forth below, with all unmodified portions of the Agreement to remain in full force and effect as written:
1.Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended to reduce the Executive’s annual base salary from $400,000 per annum to $200,000 per annum, effective as of January 1, 2016.  


2.    Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby further amended to add the following sentence to the end of the paragraph: 


“Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event the Executive is entitled to severance or other termination payments pursuant to Section 9 or Section 18, such severance or termination payment amount shall be calculated as if the Executive’s annual base compensation was $400,000 per annum.”


The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that the above-referenced reduction in base salary may be restored at any time in the Executive’s sole discretion with advance written notice from the Executive to the Company’s Compensation Committee.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Fifth Amendment as of the 19th day of November, 2015.
AMTECH SYSTEMS, INC.
By:  /s/Bradley C. Anderson
Bradley C. Anderson,


Its:  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial    Officer
By: /s/ Jong S. Whang
Jong S. Whang, Executive
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46942-46943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23581]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Beaver Creek Salvage Timber Sale and Other Restoration Projects, 
Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Union County, OR

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Revised notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact 
statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 30, 1996, a notice of intent to prepare an 
environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Beaver Creek Salvage 
Timber

[[Page 46943]]

Sale was published in the Federal Register (61 FR 68704). This notice 
announces the new dates for release of draft and final EIS and the 
change in EIS title. The draft EIS is now expected to be completed 
February, 1998 and the final EIS to be published in December, 1998. The 
title of the EIS will be ``Beaver Creek Fuels Reduction and Watershed 
Restoration Project.'' This new title more accurately reflects the 
purpose and need for this project and the activities being proposed to 
accomplish them.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Whitlock, Project Coordinator, 3502 Highway 30, La Grande, Oregon 
97850, phone (541) 962-8501.

    Dated: August 25, 1997.
Karyn L. Wood,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 97-23581 Filed 9-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
- # 

Vo^-^^ 1^1'^^^^ 

SlO-110928-01 

1617 Airport Road 

Alpena, Ml 49707 

Phone: 989-354-2907 

FAX: 989-358-9988 

Alpena County Regional Airport vinMw.aipenaairport.com 

September 22,2011 

TheHonorableRayLaHood, Secretary of Transportation -'" 

U.S. Department of Transportation S >^:'^'---J 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE "" '-^ y^' 35 

Washington, DC 20590 ^ n^pi f 

—'~j .^^ ' " ^ 

Subject: Delta Air Lines ^ ^^ ^ 

Dear Secretary LaHood: ^ -" 

This letter is to bring your attention to Alpena, Michigan, one of the communities slated 

to lose Delta Air Lines as a result of their announced air service changes in Michigan. In 

some cases, these changes simply mean an adjustment to the current service, but for 

Alpena, it means much more. 

A replacement airline will not provide the level of service needed for our economic 

vitality. It is crucial that Alpena have access to Detroit, which serves as a gateway hub to 

many domestic and international destinations as we do not have a freeway system for 

easy access, a key component of economic growth. 

For decades, Alpena has suffered economically because of our position on the map. 

However, in recent months the County of Alpena has spent over $100,000 on consult fees 

to discover a plausible means to grow the area, but this development is very much 

dependent upon easy international access to our community. If we lose that connection 

to the world that Delta provides, it will mean another setback for a community that 

deserves to finally break free from our economic doom. 

We oppose losing Delta Air Lines! We are requesting that the Department do everything 

in its power to hold Delta Air Lines in Alpena to fiilfill their "plan to enhance global 

connections to small towns and cities across the US" as stated in a letter on April 18, 

2008, announcing their plans to merge with Northwest. 

Sincerely, 

Billi M. McRoberts, Manager 

Alpena County Regional Airport 

cc: US Senator Carl Levin (D-Ml)
Exhibit 10.12
 
 th
 -
  th




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



for any
  3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



LESSEE, LESSOR AND GECC HEREBY KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY AND INTELLIGENTLY WAIVE ANY AND ALL
RIGHTS THAT EACH PARTY MAY NOW OR HEREAFTER HAVE UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OR
THE STATE OF KANSAS, TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY AND ALL ISSUES ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN ANY
ACTION OR PROCEEDING RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY RELATED TRANSACTIONS. IT IS INTENDED THAT
THIS WAIVER SHALL APPLY TO ANY AND ALL DEFENSES, RIGHTS, CLAIMS AND/OR COUNTERCLAIMS IN ANY SUCH
ACTION OR PROCEEDING.
 LESSEE, LESSOR AND GECC UNDERSTAND THAT THIS WAIVER IS A WAIVER OF A CONSTITUTIONAL SAFEGUARD,
AND EACH PARTY INDIVIDUALLY BELIEVES THAT THERE ARE SUFFICIENT ALTERNATE PROCEDURAL AND SUBSTANTIVE
SAFEGUARDS, INCLUDING, A TRIAL BY AN IMPARTIAL JUDGE, THAT ADEQUATELY OFFSET THE WAIVER CONTAINED
HEREIN.
  NONE
  7




---



##### 



Initialed for Lessor
    
    
    
    Initialed for Lessee
   8




---



##### 



ByName:
    
    Eric J. BussTitle:
    
    Secretary
     Notary PublicMy commission expires:




---



##### 



ByNameTitle
    
 
 Notary Public, State ofMy Commission Expires:




---



##### 



ByName:
    
    Eric J. BussTitle:
    
    Secretary
     Notary PublicMy commission expires:




---



#####
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18
(Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.



The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of CCF Holding Company (the small business issuer), hereby certifies as follows:



The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the small business
issuer (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the small business issuer.



Dated this 30th day of March, 2004.



/s/ Mary Jo RogersMary Jo Rogers, Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Tyrone Michael ROLLINS.

No. 61576.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 1978.

Jude Thaddeus Fanguy, Houma, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Norval J. Rhodes, Dist. Atty., James L. Alcock, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32(a)

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 of Citizens Holding Company (the Company),
as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report), I, Greg L. McKee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2006 |  | /s/ Greg L. McKee                    
|                       |  | Greg L. McKee Chief Executive
Officer