alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 51995AP0028 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 51995AP0028

**Decision on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a European Parliament and Council Directive on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions (C4- 0042/95 - 94/0159(COD)) (Codecision procedure: third reading) **

*
Official Journal C 068 , 20/03/1995 P. 0026 *

A4-0028/95

Decision on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a European Parliament and Council Directive on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions (C4-0042/95 - 94/0159(COD))

(Codecision procedure: third reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee and the declarations annexed thereto, C4-0042/95 - 94/0159(COD),

- having regard to its opinion at first reading (( OJ C 305, 23.11.1992, p. 160.)) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council, COM(0088)0496 ((OJ C 10, 13.1.1989, p. 3.)),

- having regard to its decision on the common position ((OJ C 205, 25.7.1994, p. 307.)),

- having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position (COM(94)0245 - C4-0005/94),

- having regard to Article 189b(5) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 77(2) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee (A4-0028/95),

1. Rejects the joint text;

2. Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and Commission.
#### In the Interest of M. V. W., a child, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES (NOW SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SERVICES) DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, State of Florida, Appellee.

No. CC-401.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 25, 1977.

*232Scott R. Nabors of Staats & Nabors, Panama City, for appellant.

Duane N. Ivester and Chester G. Senf, Jacksonville, Owen S. Trappe, Jr., Panama City, Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Donald K. Rudser, Asst. Atty. Gen., Eric J. Haug-dahl, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs, the record and oral argument, we find no reversible error.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 171 (Thursday, September 4, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23262]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[NV-020-1430-10]


Notice of Availability of Plan Amendment

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management, Winnemucca District, has 
completed an Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact 
of the Proposed Plan Amendments to the Paradise-Denio and Sonoma-
Gerlach Management Framework Plans.

DATES: The protest period for these Proposed Plan Amendments will 
commence with the date of publication of this notice and last 30 days. 
Protests must be received on or before October 3, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Protests must be addressed to the Director, Bureau of Land 
Management, Attn: Ms. Brenda Williams, Protests Manager (WO 210), 1849 
C Street NW/LS-1075, Washington, DC 20240, within 30 days after the 
date of publication of this Notice of Availability.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Figarelle, Lands Specialist, Winnemucca District Office, 5100 E. 
Winnemucca Boulevard, Winnemucca, Nevada 89445, (702) 623-1500.
    Copies of the Environmental Assessment and Proposed Plan Amendments 
are available for review at the Winnemucca District Office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action is announced pursuant to section 
202(a) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 and 43 CFR 
part 1610. The Proposed Amendments are subject to protest from any 
party who has participated in the planning process. Protests must be 
specific and contain the following information:

    <bullet> The name, mailing address, phone number, and interest of 
the person filing the protest.
    <bullet> A statement of the issue(s) being protested.
    <bullet> A statement of the part(s) of the proposed amendment being 
protested and citing pages, paragraphs, maps etc., of the Proposed 
Amendment.
    <bullet> A copy of all documents addressing the issue(s) submitted 
by the protestor during the planning process or a reference to the date 
when the protester discussed the issue(s) for the record.
    <bullet> A concise statement as to why the protester believes the 
BLM State Director is incorrect.

    Dated: August 25, 1997.
Ron Wenker,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-23262 Filed 9-3-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-M
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 95-20901

Summary Calendar

WELLS FARGO REAL ESTATE GROUP

INCORPORATED, formerly known as

Wells Fargo Realty Advisors;

MONTGOMERY ESTATES, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INSURANCE COMPANY;

ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(CA H 94 3129)

April 10, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This is a diversity suit based on coverage under four

insurance policies. The insured parties are Wells Fargo Real

Estate Group, Inc., a California corporation, and Montgomery

Estates, Inc., a Texas corporation (collectively referred to as
"Wells Fargo"). The insurers are Commerce & Industry Insurance

Company ("C & I"), a New York corporation, and Royal Insurance

Company of America ("Royal"), an Illinois corporation. The

insurance policies in question were comprehensive general liability

policies. Wells Fargo filed this action in a state district court

in Harris County, Texas, to recover attorneys' fees and other

defense costs incurred by it in defending a third-party action

brought against it in another state court in Harris County. Royal

and C & I removed the case to the United States District Court for

the Southern District of Texas. The parties agreed to submit the

duty to defend issue for summary judgment on stipulated facts and

each side filed motions for summary judgment thereon. The district

court found that the third-party petition failed to allege a

potential cause of action under the policies, that Royal and C & I

had no duty to defend Wells Fargo, and that the motions for summary

judgment of Royal and C & I were granted and the cross-motions for

summary judgment of Wells Fargo was denied.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, reply brief and record

excerpts and relevant portions of the record itself. For the

reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum and order

filed under date of September 25, 1995, we affirm the final

judgment entered under date of September 25, 1995, granting

defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissing the action

with prejudice.

AFFIRMED.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEngineering evaluations and studies.  Volume 1:  Exhibit AOrbiter inertial upper-stage studies, ku-band hardware studies, S-band hardware investigations, shuttle/Centaur communication system engineering investigations are provided.Document ID19840007106Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCheng, U.*(Axiomatix Los Angeles, CA, United States)*Dodds, J. G.*(Axiomatix Los Angeles, CA, United States)*Holmes, J. K.*(Axiomatix Los Angeles, CA, United States)*Huth, G. K.*(Axiomatix Los Angeles, CA, United States)*Iwasaki, R. S.*(Axiomatix Los Angeles, CA, United States)*Maronde, R. G.*(Axiomatix Los Angeles, CA, United States)*Nilsen, P. W.*(Axiomatix Los Angeles, CA, United States)*Polydoros, A.*(Axiomatix Los Angeles, CA, United States)*Roberts, D.*(Axiomatix Los Angeles, CA, United States)*Udalov, S.*(Axiomatix Los Angeles, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 4, 2013Publication DateOctober 31, 1983Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:171724R8310-6-VOL-1NASA-CR-171724Accession Number84N15174Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-16067Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19840007106.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
##### 



kpmg

|                                                                          |  |                                                           
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|KPMG LLPChartered Accountants
1200 205  5th Avenue SW
Calgary AB T2P 4B9 |  | Telephone (403) 691-8000
Telefax (403) 691-8008www.kpmg.ca



ACCOUNTANTS CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Agrium Inc.

We consent to the use of our report dated March 4, 2003 included in this Annual
Report on Form 40-F.



Signed KPMG LLP



Chartered Accountants
Calgary, Alberta

April 3, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 47786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24006]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-195; RM-9126]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Haiku, HI

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed on behalf of Native Hawaiian Broadcasting seeking the allotment 
of Channel 293C to Haiku, Hawaii, as that community's first local FM 
service. Coordinates utilized for this proposal are 20-55-03 and 156-
19-33.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before October 27, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before November 12, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 
20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties 
should serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Dan J. Alpert, Esq., 
The Law Office of Dan J. Alpert, 2120 N. 21st Rd., Suite 400, 
Arlington, VA 22201.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-195, adopted August 
27, 1997, and released September 5, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., 1231 20th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
ProposedRule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-24006 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2019126DE.01007201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 15.5.2019 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 126/72 |

---

Berichtigung der Regelung Nr. 48 der Wirtschaftskommission der Vereinten Nationen für Europa (UNECE) — Einheitliche Bedingungen für die Genehmigung von Fahrzeugen hinsichtlich des Anbaus der Beleuchtungs- und Lichtsignaleinrichtungen [2019/57]

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 14 vom 16. Januar 2019](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2019_014_R_TOC)
)

Seite 73, Absatz 6.5.3 Buchstabe A Ziffer 6, zweite Zeile:

Anstatt:

„bei Fahrzeugen der Klassen N1, M2 und M3, die nicht länger als sechs Meter sind.“

muss es heißen:

„bei Fahrzeugen der Klassen N1, M2 und M3, die länger als sechs Meter sind.“

Seite 75, Absatz 6.5.5.1 Unterabsatz 3 Buchstabe b:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „b) | Der nach oben gerichtete Winkel von 15° darf auf 5° verringert werden, wenn die Anbauhöhe der zulässigen Leuchten (gemessen gemäß den Vorschriften in Absatz 5.8.1) kleiner als 2 100 mm ist.“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „b) | Der nach oben gerichtete Winkel von 15° darf auf 5° verringert werden, wenn die Anbauhöhe der zulässigen Leuchten (gemessen gemäß den Vorschriften in Absatz 5.8.1) größer als 2 100 mm ist.“ |

Seite 79, Absatz 6.7.5 Unterabsatz 4 Buchstabe b:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „b) | Der nach oben gerichtete Winkel von 15° darf auf 5° verringert werden, wenn die Anbauhöhe der zulässigen Leuchten (gemessen gemäß den Vorschriften in Absatz 5.8.1) kleiner als 2 100 mm ist.“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „b) | Der nach oben gerichtete Winkel von 15° darf auf 5° verringert werden, wenn die Anbauhöhe der zulässigen Leuchten (gemessen gemäß den Vorschriften in Absatz 5.8.1) größer als 2 100 mm ist.“ |

Seite 83, Absatz 6.10.5.1 Unterabsatz 4 Buchstabe b:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „b) | Der nach oben gerichtete Winkel von 15° darf auf 5° verringert werden, wenn die Anbauhöhe der zulässigen Leuchten (gemessen gemäß den Vorschriften in Absatz 5.8.1) kleiner als 2 100 mm ist.“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „b) | Der nach oben gerichtete Winkel von 15° darf auf 5° verringert werden, wenn die Anbauhöhe der zulässigen Leuchten (gemessen gemäß den Vorschriften in Absatz 5.8.1) größer als 2 100 mm ist.“ |

---
# Employee Spotlight: Jason Tierson

/ Published Nov. 26, 2018
Richmond, Va., 
**Name:** Jason Tierson

**Organization:** DLA Aviation – Cherry Point

**Years of Service:** 1 1/2 

**What is your job title, and what do you do, specifically?**

My job title is customer support specialist lead. I am responsible for ensuring my teammates know how to properly research their unfilled order reports as well as any other pertinent documents that utilize the various DLA enterprise systems and websites. I am also responsible for making sure my team members know how to request expedites of awarded contracts and materials from alternate sources using multiple avenues to ensure the customer receives their materials in a timely manner.

**What do you like most about your job?**

What I like most about my job is that, after retiring from the Marine Corps, I still get the comradery and great team-building atmosphere. 

**What aspect(s) of your current job gives you the most personal satisfaction?  Why?**

The aspect of my job that gives me the greatest satisfaction is filling backorders and getting the necessary materials to our customers in a timely fashion.

**What kind(s) of training and education helps your work performance in your current role?**

The training I received while serving in the Marine Corps has proven to be invaluable and has definitely helped me in my current role. With that said, during my time here at DLA, I have attended many training sessions with local leadership and other subject matter experts from many of the DLA forward sites that have also helped me throughout my career. 

**What is your biggest pet peeve?**

Over the years, I have developed many pet peeves, but I would have to say my biggest is lack of initiative and not giving your best effort to the customer.

**What are some of your passions outside of work?**My passions outside of work include doing anything that keeps me active.  I really enjoy softball and golf but my biggest passion outside of work is watching my son play baseball with his high school and showcase teams. I just really enjoy being at the baseball field watching him.

**What is your proudest accomplishment?**

I have many accomplishments that I am proud of to include: earning the title United States Marine and retiring from the Marine Corps. However, I would have to say my proudest accomplishment is being able to see my son reach his goals in life. Seeing him achieve all of the different milestones makes me proud.
#### STATE of Louisiana In the Interest of Robert A. SMITH.

No. 61043.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1978.

In re: Robert A. Smith applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Thomas B. Pugh, Judge of the Family Court, Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 13th day of February, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of' the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this court, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
JOSEPH PRATT

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 3962

___________ __________________/

Opinion filed April 6, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Dawn Caloca

- Johnson , Judge

.

William R. Waters, Jr. of Waters & Associates, P.A., Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Justi n D. Chapman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF

, MAKAR

, and OSTERHAUS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0200 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TIMOTHY GALE MUNYAN ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 4 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 30 2021

08/30/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0200
Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,that the undersigned Director of Trump
Entertainment Resorts, Inc., a Delaware corporation which is about to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 its Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, hereby constitutes and appoints Robert M. Pickus and John P. Burke as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent to sign such Annual Report and to file such Annual Report and the exhibits thereto and any and all
documents and amendments in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any national exchange or self regulatory agency and to do and perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be done in connection with
the foregoing as fully as they might or could do in person hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Dated:February 25, 2009



/s/ Edward H. DAlelioEdward H. DAlelio, Director/s/ James FlorioJames Florio, Director/s/ Harry C. HagertyHarry C. Hagerty, Director/s/ Mark JulianoMark Juliano, Director/s/ Michael A. KramerMichael A. Kramer, Director/s/ Don ThomasDon Thomas, Director
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc., Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, L.P. and Trump Entertainment Resorts Funding, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John P. Burke, Interim Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Corporate Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 17, 2008                           
|                                                
|/s/ John P. Burke                               
|John P. Burke                                   
|Interim Chief Financial Officer,                
|Executive Vice President and Corporate Treasurer
|Trump Entertainment Resorts, Inc.               
|Trump Entertainment Resorts Holdings, L.P.      
|Trump Entertainment Resorts Funding, Inc.