alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUltrasonic stress wave characterization of composite materialsThe work reported covers three simultaneous projects. The first project was concerned with: (1) establishing the sensitivity of the acousto-ultrasonic method for evaluating subtle forms of damage development in cyclically loaded composite materials, (2) establishing the ability of the acousto-ultrasonic method for detecting initial material imperfections that lead to localized damage growth and final specimen failure, and (3) characteristics of the NBS/Proctor sensor/receiver for acousto-ultrasonic evaluation of laminated composite materials. The second project was concerned with examining the nature of the wave propagation that occurs during acoustic-ultrasonic evaluation of composite laminates and demonstrating the role of Lamb or plate wave modes and their utilization for characterizing composite laminates. The third project was concerned with the replacement of contact-type receiving piezotransducers with noncontacting laser-optical sensors for acousto-ultrasonic signal acquisition.Document ID19860018193Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsDuke, J. C., Jr.*(Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ. Blacksburg, VA, United States)*Henneke, E. G., II*(Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ. Blacksburg, VA, United States)*Stinchcomb, W. W.*(Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ. Blacksburg, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1986Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryQuality Assurance And ReliabilityReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-3976E-2948NAS 1.26:3976Accession Number86N27665Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-53-1ACONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-323Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860018193.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
No. 99-8011.

#### Devillasee *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 10.3(a)

                                   	AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                     	 TO THE
                      	AMENDED AND RESTATED SITEL CORPORATION
                         	1995 EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN
	
	            As adopted by the Board of Directors on December 26, 1996


1.  The definition of "Fair Market Value" in Section 2(n) of the Amended  and  
    Restated  SITEL  Corporation  1995  Employee Stock Option Ownership Plan 
    is amended to state as follows:

		(n)  "Fair Market Value" shall mean the value of each Share determined as of
any specified date as follows: 

		     (i)  If the Shares are traded on any recognized United States securities 
exchange, the value per Share shall be the average of the high and low prices 
of the Common Stock on such specified date (or, if there are no sales on that 
day, the last preceding day on which there was a sale) on the principal 
exchange on which the Common Stock is traded;

		     (ii)  If the Shares are not traded on any United States securities 
exchange but are traded on any formal over-the-counter quotation system in 
general use in the United States, the value per Share shall be the average of 
the high and low prices of the Common Stock on such specified date (or, if 
there are no such quotations on that day, the last preceding day on which 
there were such quotations) on the principal system on which the Common Stock 
is traded; or


       (iii)  If neither Paragraph (i) nor (ii) applies, the value per Share 
shall be determined by the Plan Administrator in good faith, based on uniform 
principles consistently applied, as an estimate of the value per Share a willing
purchaser would pay a willing seller with both parties having full knowledge of 
all relevant material facts.  Such determination shall be conclusive and binding
on all persons.
# C_2019329EN.01000201.xml

| 1.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/2

---

Notice concerning the entry into force of the 1996 Extradition Convention

(2019/C 329/02)

The Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, relating to extradition between the Member States of the European Union (1), signed in Dublin on 27 September 1996, shall enter into force on 5 November 2019, pursuant to its Article 18(3).

---

(1)  OJ C 313, 23.10.1996, p. 12.

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 157 (Thursday, August 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 43576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-21551]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33438]


Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway, LLC--Acquisition and Operation 
Exemption--The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company

    The Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway LLC of Dallas, TX (ALA), a 
noncarrier, filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 
et seq. to acquire from The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway 
Company (BNSF) and operate a 140.58-mile rail line between milepost 
776.10 near Kimbrough, AL, and milepost 916.68 in Pensacola, FL. ALA 
will also acquire incidental trackage rights over 13.6 miles of BNSF's 
line between milepost 776.10 near Kimbrough, AL, and milepost 762.5 
near Magnolia, AL. ALA will also be temporarily assigned trackage 
rights over a 43.1-mile line of CSX Transportation, Inc., between 
milepost L621.7 near Atmore, AL, and milepost L635.4 near Catonment, 
FL, pending completion of repairs to the line to be acquired from BNSF. 
The transaction is scheduled to be consummated on or after September 1, 
1997.
    This proceeding is related to Kauri, Inc., and StatesRail LLC--
Continuance in Control Exemption--Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway LLC, STB 
Finance Docket No. 33439, in which Kauri, Inc. and StatesRail LLC have 
concurrently filed a verified notice of exemption to continue in 
control of ALA when it becomes a Class III railroad.
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33438 must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Unit, 1925 K Street, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be 
served on Fritz R. Kahn, Suite 750 West, 1100 New York Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20005-3934.

    Decided: August 5, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-21551 Filed 8-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
Helping People Help the Land

Conservation Activity Plan

Pollinator Habitat Enhancement

December 2011

Pollinator Habitat 

Enhancement

A pollinator habitat enhancement 

conservation activity plan is a 

	





a landowner improve, restore, 







habitats that support native and 

managed pollinators.

NRCS Technical Service Providers 

(TSPs) prepare these plans using 

inputs such as:


 
 




 


 Habitat Suitability Index 

 models 


 
 




 plant populations


 
 




 
 


Conservation practices 

recommended in such a plan can 

include:


 
 !"
"


 
 #
$


 
 





 
 

$%


 
 &'*%$
$


 
 +
"
$

#



"



www.nrcs.usda.gov 




“Technical Service Providers.”

www.nrcs.usda.gov

USDA is an equal opportunity 

provider and employer.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1652

To suspend temporarily the duty on methoxyacetic acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2005

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on methoxyacetic acid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METHOXYACETIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.06.03 Methoxyacetic acid (CAS 

No. 625–45–6) (provided for 

in subheading 2918.90.50) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 
2

•S 1652 IS 

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

The University of Texas Health Science 

Center at Houston, Appellant

No. 06-21-00041-CV v.

Dr. John McNeely, Appellee

Appeal from the 11th District Court of 

Harris County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2020-

32037). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess 

and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the order of the 

court below. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order denying the plea to the jurisdiction and 

render judgment dismissing McNeely’s claim for lack of jurisdiction.

We further order that the appellee, Dr. John McNeely, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED OCTOBER 26, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Travis Massingill, * From the 32nd District Court

 of Mitchell County,

 Trial Court No. 7445.

Vs. No. 11-14-00289-CR * September 30, 2016

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
#### ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE CO. v. Calvin J. EDWARDS.

No. 61599.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1978.

In re: Calvin J. Edwards, applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. (Orleans).

Writ denied.
# Vandenberg solar array project

/ Published April 10, 2018
VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE, Calif., *Editor's note: The original story can be viewed on the Vandenberg Air Force Base website.*
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 4831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-2346]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Fiscal Service
[Dept. Circ. 570, 1996 Rev., Supp. No. 5]


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds; Greenwich Insurance 
Company

    A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable surety on Federal Bonds 
is hereby issued to the following company under Sections 9304 to 9308, 
Title 31, of the United States Code. Federal bond-approving officers 
should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570, 
1996 Revision, on page 34294 to reflect this addition:
    Greenwich Insurance Company. One Greenwich Plaza, P.O. Box 2568, 
Greenwich, Connecticut 06836-2568. Phone: (203) 622-5200. Underwriting 
Limitation <SUP>b: $2,842,000. Surety Licenses <SUP>c: AL, AK, AS, AZ, 
AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, DC, FL, GA, GU, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, ME, 
MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, 
PA, PR, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, VI, WA, WV, WI, WY. 
Incorporated in: California.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30 each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (31 CFR part 
223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1 
in Treasury Department Circular 570, with details as to underwriting 
limitations, areas in which licensed to transact surety business and 
other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet 
(http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.html) or through our computerized public 
bulletin board system (FMS Inside Line) at (202) 874-6887. A hard copy 
may be purchased from the Government Printing Office (GPO), 
Subscription Service Washington, DC, telephone (202) 512-1800. When 
ordering the Circular from GPO, use the following stock number: 048-
000-00499-7.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Funds 
Management Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 
6F04, Hyattsville, MD 20782, telephone (202) 874-6765.

    Dated: January 13, 1997.
Charles F. Schwan III,
Director, Funds Management Division, Financial Management Service.
[FR Doc. 97-2346 Filed 1-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 46876]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23624]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY

22 CFR 514


Exchange Visitor Program

AGENCY: United States Information Agency.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agency adopts as final and without change the interim 
final rule governing au pair program participation adopted June 27, 
1997.

DATES: This rule is effective September 5, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Exchange Visitor Program Services, 
Program Designation Branch, United States Information Agency, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Washington DC 20547; Telephone (202) 401-9810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Agency adopted an interim final rule 
governing au pair program participation on June 27, 1997 (62 FR 34632.) 
This interim final rule amended existing au pair program regulations 
adopted February 15, 1995 (60 FR 8547.) Specifically, the interim rule 
further defined the selection and screening requirements for au pair 
participants and required that participants actually attend rather than 
merely enroll for six hours of academic credit. Further, the number of 
hours that au pair may provide child care services was limited to no 
more than 10 hours per day and forty-five hours in any given week.
    The Agency provided for a thirty day public comment period which 
ended July 27, 1997 and received forty-one comments. The Agency 
reviewed those comments and found that all comments received objected 
to the educational program component, the wage to be paid to the au 
pair participant, or the limitation on the number of hours an au pair 
participant may work. Due to the Agency's past review of these three 
specific areas of the au pair program, the Agency has determined that 
it is appropriate to adopt the interim final regulation as final and 
without modification notwithstanding these comments from interested 
members of the public.

List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 514

    Cultural exchange programs.

    Dated: August 29, 1997.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.

PART 514--EXCHANGE VISITOR PROGRAM

    Accordingly, the interim rule amending 22 CFR part 514 which was 
published at 62 FR 34633 on June 27, 1997 is adopted as a final rule 
without change.

[FR Doc. 97-23624 Filed 9-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
#### Robert D. STUBBS, Jr., d/b/a Bob Stubbs Motors, et al., Appellants, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 69-10.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 15, 1969.

Richard C. Carter, Jr., Miami, for appellants.

Knight, Underwood, Peters, Hoeveler & Pickle, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., HENDRY, J., and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See United Bonding Insurance Company v. Inter National Bank of Miami, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 20; Joseph v. Houdaille-Duval-Wright Co., Fla.App. 1968, 213 So.2d 3.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1985 

To extend the predisaster hazard mitigation program under the Stafford 

Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2005 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend the predisaster hazard mitigation program under 

the Stafford Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PREDISASTER HAZARD MITIGATION PROGRAM. 

4 Section 203(m) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

5 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 5133(m)) is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2005’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2007’’. 

Æ
#### Manuel RIPOLL v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50003.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 23, 1977.

Everett Verhine, John B. Gee, Vicksburg, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Frankie Walton White and Robert D. Findley, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from County Court, Warren County; James E. Nichols, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.

REVERSED AND APPELLANT DISCHARGED.

PATTERSON, C. J., INZER, P. J., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, WALKER and BROOM, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                          4,103
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   185,975
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     29,941
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                290,148
<PP&E>                          287,356
<DEPRECIATION>                  (87,907)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  645,195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,188,548
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     764
<COMMON>                        13,020
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    645,195
<SALES>                         2,023,227
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,023,227
<CGS>                           1,447,475
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,828,513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              31,094
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (808,733)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (808,733)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (808,733)
<EPS-BASIC>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.07)



</TABLE>
Friday May 25, 2007

Company Press Release

Source: Salisbury Bancorp, Inc.

Salisbury Contact: John F. Perotti-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                   (860) 435-9801 x 1001 or jp@salisburybank.com

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Salisbury Bancorp, Inc. Announces Second Quarter Dividend

Lakeville,  Connecticut,  May 25,  2007/PRNewswire...  The Board of Directors of
Salisbury Bancorp,  Inc. (AMEX:SAL),  the holding company for Salisbury Bank and
Trust Company  declared a $.27 per common share quarterly cash dividend at their
May 25,  2007  meeting.  Dividends  year-to-date  for 2007 total $.54 per common
share.  This  represents  an increase of $.02 or 4% over the $.52 per share cash
dividends  paid during the same period in 2006. The quarterly cash dividend will
be paid on July 31, 2007 to shareholders of record as of June 29, 2007.

Salisbury  Bancorp's sole  subsidiary,  Salisbury  Bank and Trust Company,  is a
community  bank. The Company has assets in excess of $444 million and capital in
excess of $43 million and has served the communities of northwestern Connecticut
and proximate  communities in New York and  Massachusetts  for approximately 150
years.   Salisbury  Bank  and  Trust  Company  is  headquartered  in  Lakeville,
Connecticut and operates full service  branches in Canaan,  Salisbury and Sharon
as  well  as  Lakeville,   Connecticut   and  South   Egremont  and   Sheffield,
Massachusetts.  The Bank  offers a full  complement  of  consumer  and  business
banking products and services as well as trust and investment services.

Statements  contained in this news release contain  forward  looking  statements
within the  meaning of the  Private  Securities  Litigation  Reform Act of 1995.
These statements are based on the beliefs and expectations of management as well
as the assumptions  made using  information  currently  available to management.
Since these statements reflect the views of management concerning future events,
these statements involve risks,  uncertainties and assumptions,  including among
others:  changes in market  interest  rates and  general and  regional  economic
conditions; changes in government regulations; changes in accounting principles;
and the quality or composition  of the loan and investment  portfolios and other
factors that may be described in the  Company's  quarterly  reports on Form 10-Q
and its annual report on Form 10-K,  each filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission,  which are  available at the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission's
internet website (www.sec.gov) and to which reference is hereby made. Therefore,
actual future  results may differ  significantly  from results  discussed in the
forward looking statements.

                                      -3-
#### MORAN v. ANDERSON.

No. 38920.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 1969.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 1, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 224 So.2d 357.