Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 167 / Thursday, August 28, 1997 / Notices 45689

Paragraph IV.A. above, Mr. Robert J.

Nelson shall, within 20 days of his

acceptance of his first employment offer

involving NRC-licensed activities as

defined in Paragraph IV.A above,

provide notice to the Director, Office of

Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission, Washington, DC 20555, of

the name, address, and telephone

number of the employer or the entity

where he is, or will be, involved in

NRC-licensed activities. The notice shall

include a statement of his commitment

to compliance with regulatory

requirements and the basis for why the

Commission should have confidence

that he will now comply with

applicable NRC requirements.

The Director, Office of Enforcement,

may relax or rescind, in writing, any of

the above conditions upon

demonstration by Mr. Nelson of good

cause.

V

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, Mr.

Nelson must, and any other person(s)

adversely affected by this Order may,

submit an answer to this Order, and

may request a hearing on this Order,

within 20 days of the date of this Order.

Where good cause is shown,

consideration will be given to extending

the time to request a hearing. A request

for extension of time must be made in

writing to the Director, Office of

Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory

Commission Washington, DC 20555,

and include a statement of good cause

for the extension. The answer may

consent to this Order. Unless the answer

consents to this Order, the answer shall,

in writing and under oath or

affirmation, specifically admit or deny

each allegation or charge made in this

Order and shall set forth the matters of

fact and law on which Mr. Nelson or

other person(s) adversely affected relies

and the reasons as to why the Order

should not have been issued. Any

answer or request for a hearing shall be

submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear

Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Chief,

Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff,

Washington, DC 20555.

Copies also shall be sent to the

Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission,

Washington, DC 20555, to the Assistant

General Counsel for Hearings and

Enforcement at the same address, and to

the Regional Administrator, NRC Region

II, Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth

Street, SW Suite 23T85, Atlanta, Georgia

30303 and to Mr. Nelson if the answer

or hearing request is by a person other

than Mr. Nelson. If a person other than

Mr. Nelson requests a hearing, that

person shall set forth with particularity

the manner in which his interest is

adversely affected by this Order and

shall address the criteria set forth in 10

CFR 2.714(d).

If a hearing is requested by Mr.

Nelson or a person whose interest is

adversely affected, the Commission will

issue an Order designating the time and

place of any hearing. If a hearing is held,

the issue to be considered at such

hearing shall be whether this Order

should be sustained.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202(c)(2)(i), Mr.

Nelson, may, in addition to demanding

a hearing, at the time the answer is filed

or sooner, move the presiding officer to

set aside the immediate effectiveness of

the Order on the ground that the Order,

including the need for immediate

effectiveness, is not based on adequate

evidence but on mere suspicion,

unfounded allegations, or error.

In the absence of any request for

hearing, or written approval of an

extension of time in which to request a

hearing, the provisions specified in

Section IV above shall be final 20 days

from the date of this Order without

further order or proceedings. If an

extension of time for requesting a

hearing has been approved, the

provisions specified in Section IV shall

be final when the extension expires if a

hearing request has not been received.

An answer or a request for hearing shall

not stay the immediate effectiveness of

this order.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 18th day

of August 1997.

Ashok C. Thadani,

Acting Deputy Executive Director for

Regulatory Effectiveness.

[FR Doc. 97–22939 Filed 8–27–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL

MANAGEMENT

Proposed Collection; Comment

Request

AGENCY: Office of Personnel

Management.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.

L. 104–13, May 22, 1995), this notice

announces that the Office of Personnel

Management intends to submit to the

Office of Management and Budget a

request for the clearance of an

information collection. The questions

are intended to elicit from Federal

contractors descriptions of successes in

hiring workers directly off the welfare

rolls. The submissions are entirely

voluntary.

DATES: Comments on this proposal

should be received on or before October

27, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments

to—Donna Beecher, Director, Office of

Contracting and Administrative

Services, U.S. Office of Personnel

Management, 1900 E St., NW, Room

1340, Washington, DC 20415.

For information regarding

administrative coordination, contact—

Kent Bailey, Publications Services

Division, 202–606–2260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March

8, 1997, the President called for the

Federal Government to support welfare

reform by joining with other employers

in offering jobs to welfare recipients. On

April 10, 1997, the Office of

Management and Budget’s Office of

Federal Procurement Policy asked

Federal Agencies to emphasize to their

contractors the importance of hiring

people off the welfare rolls.

Federal agencies regularly report their

welfare-to-work hires and related

experiences. They would like to include

in their reports success stories from

their contractors. Success stories

provide examples that help to inform

the public and encourage additional

hiring by other non-Federal employers.

This information collection is entirely

voluntary and can be submitted

whenever the contractor chooses to do

so. The information requested and

reporting instructions will be posted on

the Acquisition Reform Network home

page on the Internet (www.arnet.gov) for

a period of approximately four (4) years.

A listing of agency contacts will be

included in the posting. Government

contractors will be invited to send their

responses directly, via Internet e-mail,

to their primary agency contact.

The information collection consists of

a set of questions. Some of the questions

are narrative and some statistical. The

purpose of the statistical questions is

not to gather statistically valid data but

to provide a context for narrative

descriptions of success. The responses

should cover activity since March 8,

1997, and should apply to adults and

teen heads of household who

immediately prior to hiring were

receiving assistance under the

Temporary Assistance for Needy

Families (TANF) program, Aid to

Families with Dependent Children

(AFDC), or Tribal Temporary Assistance

for Needy Families program

administered by an eligible Indian tribe.

The proposed information collection

will consist of the following questions:
45690 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 167 / Thursday, August 28, 1997 / Notices

1. What is the success story you

would like to submit?

2. How many former welfare

recipients have you hired? Please

provide an estimate of the time period

during which the hiring was done.

3. What percent of these hires would

you estimate were attributable to

Federal contracts?

4. What percent of these hires would

you estimate were attributable to this

Department’s or Agency’s contracts?

5. Please share any comments on:

—Recruitment strategies

—Retention strategies

—Welfare to Work hiring with

subcontractors

—Challenges overcome

This Success Story submitted by:

Company Name lllllllllllll

Company Address llllllllllll

Contact Person lllllllllllll

Phone Number lllllllllllll

E-mail lllllllllllllllll

Burden: We estimate that 10,000

responses will be submitted annually,

and that each response will take

approximately 60 minutes to prepare.

The annual estimated burden is 10,000

hours.

Comments Requested: We are asking

for comments in order to:

1. Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the Government, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

2. Evaluate the accuracy of the

estimate of the burden of the proposed

collection of information, including the

validity of the methodology and

assumptions used;

3. Enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

4. Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

Janice R. Lachance,

Deputy Director.

[FR Doc. 97–22868 Filed 8–27–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325–01–M

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Disaster #2975, Amdt. 1]

State of Colorado

In accordance with a notice from the

Federal Emergency Management Agency

dated August 12, 1997, the abovenumbered Declaration is hereby

amended to establish the incident

period for this disaster as beginning on

July 28, 1997 and continuing through

August 12, 1997.

All other information remains the

same, i.e., the deadline for filing

applications for physical damage is

September 30, 1997 and for economic

injury the termination date is May 1,

1998.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

Program Nos. 59002 and 59008)

Dated: August 20, 1997.

Herbert L. Mitchell,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 97–22865 Filed 8–27–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory

Committee; Transport Airplane and

Engine Issues—New Task

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of a new task assignment

for the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory

Committee (ARAC).

SUMMARY: Notice is given of a new task

assigned to and accepted by the

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory

Committee (ARAC). This notice informs

the public of the activities of ARAC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Stewart R. Miller, Manager, Transport

Standards Staff, ANM–110, FAA,

Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft

Certification Service, 1601 Lind Ave.

SW., Renton, WA 98055–4056,

telephone (425) 227–2190, fax (425)

227–1320.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The FAA has established an Aviation

Rulemaking Advisory Committee to

provide advice and recommendations to

the FA Administrator, through the

Associate Administrator for Regulation

and Certification, on the full range of

the FAA’s rulemaking activities with

respect to aviation-related issues. This

includes obtaining advice and

recommendations of the FAA’s

commitment to harmonize its Federal

Aviation Regulations (FAR) and

practices with the aviation authorities in

Europe and Canada.

One area ARAC deals with is

Transport Airplane and Engine Issues.

These issues involve the airworthiness

standard for transport category airplanes

in 14 CFR part 25, 33, and 35 and

parallel provisions in 14 CFR parts 121

and 135. The corresponding European

airworthiness standards for transport

category airplanes are contained in Joint

Aviation Requirements (JAR)–25, JAR–E

and JAR–P, respectively. The

corresponding Canadian Standards are

contained in Chapters 525, 533 and 535

respectively.

The Task

This notice is to inform the public

that the FAA has asked ARAC to

provide advice and recommendation on

the following harmonization task:

FAR/JAR 25 Aging Aircraft

1. ARAC is tasked to review the

capability of analytical methods and

their validation; related research work;

relevant full-scale and component

fatigue test data; and tear down

inspection reports, including

fractographic analysis, relative to the

detection of widespread fatigue damage

(WFD). Since aircraft in the fleet

provide important data for determining

where and when WFD is occurring in

the structure, ARAC will review

fractographic data from representative

‘‘fleet leader’’ airplanes. Where

sufficient relevant data for certain

airplane models does not currently

exist, ARAC will recommend how to

obtain sufficient data from

representative airplanes to determine

the extent of WFD in the fleet. The

review should take into account the

Airworthiness Assurance

Harmonization Working Group report

‘‘Structural Fatigue Evaluation for Aging

Aircraft’’ dated October 14, 1993, and

extend its applicability to all transport

category airplanes having a maximum

gross weight greater than 75,000

pounds.

2. ARAC will produce time standards

for the initiation and completion of

model specific programs (relative to the

airplane’s design service goal) to

predict, verify and rectify widespread

fatigue damage. ARAC will also

recommend action that the Authorities

should take if a program, for certain

model airplanes, is not initiated and

completed prior to those time standards.

Actions that ARAC will consider

include regulations to require Type

Certificate holders to develop WFD

programs, modification action,

operational limits, and inspection

requirements to assure structural

integrity of the airplanes. ARAC will

provide a discussion of the relative

merits of each option.

This task should be completed within

18 months of tasking.