alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Adolor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Thomas P. Hess, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Thomas P. Hess     
|Thomas P. Hess         
|Chief Financial Officer
|October 31, 2006
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


                               BWAY CORPORATION
                               ----------------


                            Brockway Standard, Inc.
                     Brockway Standard (New Jersey), Inc.
                           Milton Can Company, Inc.
                       Brockway Standard (Canada), Inc.
                        BWAY Foreign Sales Corporation
                          Materials Management, Inc.


                            BROCKWAY STANDARD, INC.
                            ----------------------

                          Armstrong Containers, Inc.
                        Brockway Standard (Ohio), Inc.
                              Plate Masters, Inc.


                     BROCKWAY STANDARD (NEW JERSEY), INC.
                     ------------------------------------

                          Milton Metal Graphics, Inc.
                          Northeast Tin Plate Company

               The Company and all subsidiaries of the Company 
                          are Delaware Corporations.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 03-7128

ALLEN RAY JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge.

(CR-01-167)

Submitted: September 29, 2003

Decided: November 4, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by unpublished per

curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Allen Ray Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Allen Ray Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We affirm in part,

vacate in part, and remand. 

Johnson alleged in his § 2241 petition that 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)

(2000), the statute under which he was convicted, had been repealed

and, therefore, that his conviction was unconstitutional. The district

court found that Johnson could not proceed under § 2241 because he

failed to show that a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), was

inadequate to test the legality of his detention. We agree and affirm

this portion of the district court’s order. 

To the extent that the district court also construed Johnson’s § 2241

petition as an initial § 2255 motion, we note that the court did not

give Johnson notice and an opportunity to respond before recharacterizing his petition as a § 2255 motion, as required by our decision

in United States v. Emmanuel, 288 F.3d 644 (4th Cir. 2002). We

therefore vacate this portion of the district court’s order and remand

for further proceedings in light of Emmanuel. On remand, the district

court should give Johnson the notice required under Emmanuel, consider his claims under § 2255 (barring any objection from Johnson),

and provide him a reasonable amount of time to amend the motion to

reflect any additional claims for relief. See id. at 649. 

Finally, we decline to address the issues Johnson raises for the first

time on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.

1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED

IN PART, AND REMANDED

2 UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON
You've reached your data limit for the moment. Please wait a bit and try again.
# L_2020175DE.01001501.xml

| 4.6.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 175/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 175/15

---

Berichtigung der UN-Regelung Nr. 145 — Einheitliche Bedingungen für die Genehmigung von Fahrzeugen hinsichtlich der ISOFIX-Verankerungssysteme, der Verankerungen des oberen ISOFIX-Haltegurtes und der i-Size-Sitzplätze [2019/2142]

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 324 vom 13. Dezember 2019
  )

Seite 52, Absatz 5.2.2.2:

Anstatt:

| „5.2.2.2. | Ein an einer Sitzposition installiertes ISOFIX-Verankerungssystem darf nicht weiter als 120 mm hinter dem in Anhang 4 dieser Regelung definierten konstruktiv festgelegten H-Punkt liegen, wobei der Abstand waagerecht bis zur Mitte der Strebe zu messen ist.“ |
| --- | --- |

„5.2.2.2.

Ein an einer Sitzposition installiertes ISOFIX-Verankerungssystem darf nicht weiter als 120 mm hinter dem in Anhang 4 dieser Regelung definierten konstruktiv festgelegten H-Punkt liegen, wobei der Abstand waagerecht bis zur Mitte der Strebe zu messen ist.“

muss es heißen:

| „5.2.2.2. | Ein an einer Sitzposition installiertes ISOFIX-Verankerungssystem darf nicht weniger als 120 mm hinter dem in Anhang 4 dieser Regelung definierten konstruktiv festgelegten H-Punkt liegen, wobei der Abstand waagerecht bis zur Mitte der Strebe zu messen ist.“ |
| --- | --- |

„5.2.2.2.

Ein an einer Sitzposition installiertes ISOFIX-Verankerungssystem darf nicht weniger als 120 mm hinter dem in Anhang 4 dieser Regelung definierten konstruktiv festgelegten H-Punkt liegen, wobei der Abstand waagerecht bis zur Mitte der Strebe zu messen ist.“

---
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PAUL WHOOTEN, :

:

Plaintiff :

:

v. : CIVIL NO. 4:CV-04-223

:

ANTHONY BUSSANICH, ET AL., :

: (Judge Jones)

Defendants :

 ORDER

September 20, 2005

This pro se action was initiated by Paul Whooten (“Plaintiff” or

“Whooten”), an inmate presently confined at the United States Penitentiary, in

Lewisburg, Pennsylvania (“USP-Lewisburg”). Presently pending before the Court

is Plaintiff’s motion seeking appointment of counsel (doc. 55).

Although prisoners have no constitutional or statutory rights to appointment

of counsel in a civil case, the court does have broad discretionary power to appoint

counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Tabron v. Grace, 6 F.3d 147, 153 (3d Cir.

1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1196 (1994); Ray v. Robinson, 640 F.2d 474, 477

(3d Cir. 1981). The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has stated that

Case 4:04-cv-00223-JEJ-JVW Document 58 Filed 09/20/05 Page 1 of 3
2

appointment of counsel for an indigent litigant should be made when

circumstances indicate "the likelihood of substantial prejudice to him resulting, for

example, from his probable inability without such assistance to present the facts

and legal issues to the court in a complex but arguably meritorious case." 

Smith-Bey v. Petsock, 741 F.2d 22, 26 (3d Cir. 1984). 

In a subsequent decision, the Third Circuit similarly recognized that

“[i]ndigent civil litigants possess neither a constitutional nor a statutory right to

appointed counsel.” Montgomery v. Pinchak, 294 F.3d 492, 498 (3d Cir. 2002)

(citation omitted). The Third Circuit also reiterated that the criteria developed in

Tabron should be employed in addressing the appointment of counsel issue.

Whooten's motion fails to set forth sufficient special circumstances or

factors that would warrant appointment of counsel. Tabron, supra, at 155-56. In

the pleadings submitted by Plaintiff to date, he has demonstrated that he is capable

of presenting comprehensible arguments. Furthermore, this Court's liberal

construction of pro se pleadings, Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972), coupled

with Plaintiff's apparent ability to litigate this action pro se, mitigate against the

appointment of counsel. Moreover, the legal issues are relatively uncomplicated,

and the Court cannot say, at least at this point, that Whooten will suffer substantial

Case 4:04-cv-00223-JEJ-JVW Document 58 Filed 09/20/05 Page 2 of 3
3

prejudice if he is forced to prosecute this case on his own. 

Therefore, Whooten’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel will be denied. 

In the event, however, that future proceedings demonstrate the need for counsel,

the matter may be reconsidered either sua sponte or upon a motion properly filed

by the Plaintiff.

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (doc. 55) is

DENIED. 

s/ John E. Jones III

JOHN E. JONES III

United States District Judge

Case 4:04-cv-00223-JEJ-JVW Document 58 Filed 09/20/05 Page 3 of 3
### A flora of Green River age in the Wind River basin of Wyoming

Professional  Paper 165 

By: E. W. Berry

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp165B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report** 
-                                 Larger Work: This publication is Chapter                                B of                                                                              Shorter contributions to general geology, 1930                                                                    
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Compensation Letter between the Registrant and Mark P. Dentinger



 Exhibit 10.7 
  

			
	 BEA Systems, Inc.
	  	2315 North First Street
		  	San Jose, California 95131
		  	Telephone: +1.408.570.8000
		  	Facsimile: +1.408.570.8901
		  	www.bea.com

 

 
 April 25, 2007 
 Mark
Dentinger 
 2315 N. First Street 
 San Jose, CA 95110 

RE: FY08 Compensation Awards 
 Dear Mark: 
 I am happy to advise you that the Compensation Committee has approved the following FY08 Cash and Equity Rewards in recognition of your contributions over the last
fiscal year. 
 Base Salary and Bonus Potential 
 Effective May 1, 2007, your new annual base salary will be $450,000, payable in accordance with our regular payroll cycle. This represents a 12.5% adjustment. Your target bonus will be 75% of your base salary in accordance with our
FY08 Executive Staff Bonus Plan. The Plan document will be sent under separate cover. Thus, your On-Target-Earnings (OTE) will be $787,500. 
 Equity

 The Compensation Committee also approved the granting of a Non-Qualified Stock Option to purchase 165,000 shares of Company common
stock with our standard 4 year vesting for options as well as 55,000 Restricted Stock Units (RSU’s) with our standard 4 year vesting for RSUs. The option will be granted in accordance with our standard equity granting practices as soon
as practicable following the Q1 FY08 earnings announcement. The RSUs will be granted in accordance with our standard equity granting practices as soon as practicable after the Company becomes current in filing its financial statements with the SEC.

 Mark, I deeply appreciate your contributions and look forward to FY08 with optimism and excitement. Thanks for all of your hard work! 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	Alfred
# Creative solutions to oil waste, sources for fuel of tomorrow

/ Published Jan. 18, 2019

                The Navy is using temporary tanks like these to store fuel oil reclaimed.                            181119-D-D0441-001                            The Navy is using temporary tanks like these to store fuel oil reclaimed.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Courtesy PhotoVIRIN: 190101-D-YE683-023As the U.S. government’s largest supplier of fuel to the Department of Defense and other government agencies, the Defense Logistics Agency is constantly looking for environmentally conscious ways to cut waste, maximize supply chains and build resilient, efficient sources of energy.

## **Recycling Used Oil**

When DLA Energy Quality Assurance Representative Daniel Muranaka learned the Navy was spending a lot of money to dispose of its used fuel oil, he decided to do something about it – and found a way to not only save up to $1 million per year but actually generate a revenue. 

DLA Energy Pacific at Hawaii

                Defense Logistics Agency Energy Hawaii Quality Assurance Representative Daniel Muranaka handles a sample from one of Naval Facilities Engineering Command Hawaii fuel oil reclaimed tanks. The samples were delivered to Island Energy Services to conduct testing.            

                181001-D-D0441-999            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Daniel Muranaka

VIRIN: 190101-D-YE683-024

“As a quality assurance representative, I don’t have the opportunity to manage and analyze programs and projects, especially those that transcend agencies with millions of dollars at stake,” he said. “This project allowed me to demonstrate the capability of managing and analyzing projects with significant impacts.”                The University of Maine’s Biomass to Bioproducts Pilot Plant at its Technology Research Center is working to convert cellulosic material like recycled paper and cardboard into jet fuel.                            180730-D-D0441-998                            The University of Maine’s Biomass to Bioproducts Pilot Plant at its Technology Research Center is working to convert cellulosic material like recycled paper and cardboard into jet fuel.            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: University of MaineVIRIN: 190101-D-YE683-025

## **Pulp to Propulsion**

## **Certification**

                Naval Facilities Engineering Command Hawaii employees conduct sampling of fuel oil reclaimed.            

                181119-D-D0441-002            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Courtesy Photo

VIRIN: 190101-D-YE683-026
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of American Physicians Service Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.







|                        |  |              
|----------------------- |  | -------------
|/s/ Marc J. Zimmermann  |  | March 3, 2010
|Marc J. Zimmermann      |  | Date         
|Chief Financial Officer |  |
### Lithologic studies of fine-grained Upper Cretaceous sedimentary rocks of the Black Hills region

By: W. W. Rubey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp165A

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
-                                 Larger Work: This publication is Chapter                                A of                                                                              Shorter contributions to general geology, 1930                                                                    
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

# FILED AUG 1 32009 Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts 

### Douglas McLaren, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### Plaintiff, 

### v. Civil Action No. 

# 02 

# 1528 BarackObama,President ofthe United States,Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before this court on the plaintiffs application to proceed informapauperis, pro se complaint, motion for immediate injunction, motion to seal, and motion for appointed legal counsel. The court will grant the application, dismiss the complaintbecause it fails to state a claim upon which reliefmay be granted against this defendant, and deny all pending motions as moot. The complaint seeks "immediate reliefofphys[ic]al, civil momentary harm," Complaint at 2, and 4.7 trillion dollars in damages, id. at 4. The remainder ofthe four pages ofthe complaint consists ofincoherent phrases and terms, such as the following:

Id. at 2.Religious persecution, political persecution, difirmation [sic], slander, criminal slander, discrim[in]ation, racism, reverse racism discrim[in]ation. Sexual harassment harassment, invasion ofprivacy invasion criminal invasion ofprivacy violation ofdomain, to violations ofsovereign domain. Invasion ofdomain of legal filings, retal[ia]tory acts. Interference with legal filings ....
This court is obligated by federal lawto dismiss a complaint that is filed without prepayment offiling fees whenever it determines that the complaint fails to state a claim uponwhich reliefmay be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Here, the complaint does not contain any factual allegations to establishthatthe plaintiffhas suffered an injury attributable to the defendant. In fact, the only reference to the defendant outside the caption is found onthe last page ofthe complaint in a sentence that reads in whole: "Sex crime, pornography on innocent person by Barack Obama, counterpart relatory [sic] acts." Complaint at 4. The next, and last, allegation in the complaint states in whole: "Inciting race political religous assaults with injuries
as relatory." 

### Id. The allegations in the complaint do not state a claim upon which reliefmay be granted against the defendant, and the court will dismiss the complaint. An appropriate order accompanies this memoran

- 2 -
255 La. 545

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Marvin D. ELLENDER.

No. 50427.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 4, 1970.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Application denied — Although it is procedurally improper to require the State to disclose whether it has secured a confession (oral or written) on a motion for a bill of particulars, as the function of particulars is to inform the accused in greater detail of the nature and cause of the charge against him, the State has not been harmed by the ruling herein since, under Art. 768 C.Cr.P., it could not introduce evidence of an oral confession without advising defendant in writing of its intention to do so prior to the opening statement.

SUMMERS, J., agrees with the result only.
|   | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|

 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

American Physicians Service Group, Inc.

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-07427, No. 333-62233, No. 333-116848 and No, 333-133544) of American Physicians Service Group, Inc. of our report dated March 26, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and Schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 

BDO Seidman, LLP

 

Houston, Texas

March 26, 2007
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136080 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 136080 

 COA: 276166 

Kent CC: 06-006769-FH 

STEVEN BERNARD BOGARD,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 13, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0616 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 23, 2008 

 Clerk