alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1818 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the manufacturing 

deduction provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 with 

respect to income attributable to domestic production activities in any 

possession of the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 4, 2005 

Mr. KERRY (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

manufacturing deduction provided by the American Jobs 

Creation Act of 2004 with respect to income attributable 

to domestic production activities in any possession of 

the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTION ALLOWABLE WITH RESPECT TO IN4 COME ATTRIBUTABLE TO DOMESTIC PRO5 DUCTION ACTIVITIES IN POSSESSIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (d) of section 199 of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to definitions 
2 

•S 1818 IS 

1 and special rules) is amended by redesignating paragraph 

2 (7) as paragraph (8) and by inserting after paragraph (6) 

3 the following new paragraph: 

4 ‘‘(7) POSSESSIONS, ETC.— 

5 ‘‘(A) DETERMINATION OF DOMESTIC PRO6 DUCTION GROSS RECEIPTS.—In the case of any 

7 taxpayer with gross receipts for any taxable 

8 year from sources within any possession of the 

9 United States, if all of such receipts are taxable 

10 under section 1 or 11 for such taxable year, 

11 then for purposes of determining the domestic 

12 production gross receipts of such taxpayer for 

13 such taxable year under subsection (c)(4), the 

14 term ‘United States’ shall include the posses15 sions of the United States. 

16 ‘‘(B) SPECIAL RULE FOR APPLYING WAGE

17 LIMITATION.—In the case of any taxpayer de18 scribed in subparagraph (A), for purposes of 

19 applying the limitation under subsection (b) for 

20 any taxable year, the determination of W–2 

21 wages of such taxpayer shall be made without 

22 regard to any exclusion under section 

23 3401(a)(8) for remuneration paid for services 

24 performed in a possession of the United 

25 States.’’. 
3 

•S 1818 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2005. 

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 97-10090

Conference Calendar

__________________

SHAWN ERIC McGEE,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE; 

DALLAS COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT;

STATE OF TEXAS, 

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:96-CV-1295

- - - - - - - - - -

August 15, 1997

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Shawn Eric McGee, a Texas inmate (# 582006), appeals the

district court’s order denying his motion to file an out-of-time

appeal from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights

complaint. This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction

on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659,

660 (5th Cir. 1987). At the time of filing the notice of appeal,

the district court had not entered a final or otherwise

appealable order; orders of the magistrate judge are not
No. 97-10090

-2-

appealable to this court. Trufant v. Autocon, Inc., 729 F.2d

308, 309 (5th Cir. 1984).

McGee’s motions for appointment of counsel, for leave to

file a supplemental brief, and to amend his brief, and his three

separate motions to “add exhibits,” are DENIED as moot.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED AS MOOT.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMultiscale Modeling of PEEK Using Reactive Molecular Dynamics Modeling and MicromechanicsPolyether ether ketone (PEEK) is a high-performance, semi-crystalline thermoplastic that is used in a wide range of engineering applications, including some structural components of aircraft. The design of new PEEK-based materials requires a precise understanding of the multiscale structure and behavior of semi-crystalline PEEK. Molecular Dynamics (MD) modeling can efficiently predict bulk-level properties of single phase polymers, and micromechanics can be used to homogenize those phases based on the overall polymer microstructure. In this study, MD modeling was used to predict the mechanical properties of the amorphous and crystalline phases of PEEK. The hierarchical microstructure of PEEK, which combines the aforementioned phases, was modeled using a multiscale modeling approach facilitated by NASA's MSGMC. The bulk mechanical properties of semi-crystalline PEEK predicted using MD modeling and MSGMC agree well with vendor data, thus validating the multiscale modeling approach.Document ID20180002983Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPisani, William A.*(Michigan Technological Univ. Houghton, MI, United States)*Radue, Matthew*(Michigan Technological Univ. Houghton, MI, United States)*Chinkanjanarot, Sorayot*(Michigan Technological Univ. Houghton, MI, United States)*Bednarcyk, Brett A.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Pineda, Evan J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*King, Julia A.*(Michigan Technological Univ. Houghton, MI, United States)*Odegard, Gregory M.*(Michigan Technological Univ. Houghton, MI, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 21, 2018Publication DateMay 1, 2018Subject CategoryChemistry And Materials (General)Computer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN49546E-19498NASA/TM-2018-219873Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.03.01.30.02CONTRACT_GRANT: NNX11AI72ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20180002983.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 4.2 Second Amendment to First Common Stock Purchase Warrant of View
Systems, Inc. (Company), Dated February 18, 2000, Issued to Rubin Investment
Group (Holder) and to Subscription and Investment Agreement, dated February 18,
2000, Between Company and Holder

                                  VIEW SYSTEMS, INC.

                                  July 19, 2000

Rubin Investment Group
Attention:  Mr. Dan Rubin

Dear Mr. Rubin:

         This letter refers to the rights of Rubin Investment Group ("RIG") as
to shares of common stock of View Systems, Inc. ("View") currently owned and
which may be acquired by RIG (collectively, the "Initial Shares"). The Initial
Shares consist of 1,065,000 shares currently owned and 2,235,000 shares which
may be acquired by RIG upon the exercise of warrants.

         View has filed a registration statement on Form SB-2 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission to register 853,000 Initial Shares. View
further confirms and agrees that:

              (1) View will file a registration statement on Form SB-2 or other
appropriate form to register 939,000 additional Initial Shares within thirty
(30) days after written demand is given to View by RIG to register any
additional Initial Shares; and

              (2) View will file a second registration statement on Form SB-2 or
other appropriate form to register all remaining Initial Shares then owned by
RIG within thirty (30) days after a second written demand is given to View by
RIG to register additional Initial Shares.

         In the event RIG makes a written demand to register Initial Shares but
does not directly own the number of Initial Shares covered by the registration
statement filed by View hereunder, RIG will exercise its warrants within 30 days
after the effective date of the registration statement so that it owns directly
that number of Initial Shares covered by the registration statement. The demand
registration rights provided in this letter shall expire on December 31, 2001.

         View further agrees that the warrants currently owned by RIG are hereby
amended to extend the exercise period to the 30th day following the effective
date of a second registration statement filed by View pursuant to a second
demand by RIG to register Initial Shares.

         If the following accurately reflects our agreement, please sign in the
space below.

                                  Sincerely,
                                  VIEW SYSTEMS, INC.


                                  By:/s/ Gunther Than
                                     ------------------------
                                     Gunther Than, President

ACCEPTED AND AGREED
Rubin Investment Group

By:/s/ Dan Rubin
   -----------------------
   Dan Rubin
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHelicopter rotor noise due to ingestion of atmospheric turbulenceA theoretical study was conducted to develop an analytical prediction method for helicopter main rotor noise due to the ingestion of atmospheric turbulence. This study incorporates an atmospheric turbulence model, a rotor mean flow contraction model and a rapid distortion turbulence model which together determine the statistics of the non-isotropic turbulence at the rotor plane. Inputs to the combined mean inflow and turbulence models are controlled by atmospheric wind characteristics and helicopter operating conditions. A generalized acoustic source model was used to predict the far field noise generated by the non-isotropic flow incident on the rotor. Absolute levels for acoustic spectra and directivity patterns were calculated for full scale helicopters, without the use of empirical or adjustable constants. Comparisons between isotropic and non-isotropic turbulence at the rotor face demonstrated pronounced differences in acoustic spectra. Turning and contraction of the flow for hover and low speed vertical ascent cases result in a 3 dB increase in the acoustic spectrum energy and a 10 dB increase in tone levels. Compared to trailing edge noise, turbulence ingestion noise is the dominant noise mechanism below approximately 30 rotor harmonics, while above 100 harmonics, trailing edge noise levels exceed turbulence ingestion noise by 25 dB.Document ID19860015745Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSimonich, J. C.*(United Technologies Research Center East Hartford, CT, United States)*Amiet, R. K.*(United Technologies Research Center East Hartford, CT, United States)*Schlinker, R. H.*(United Technologies Research Center East Hartford, CT, United States)*Greitzer, E. M.*(Massachussetts Inst. of Technology Cambridge, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1986Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:3973NASA-CR-3973Accession Number86N25216Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-17096Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860015745.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MCI WORLDCOM, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,727
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,229
<ALLOWANCES>                                       920
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,769
<PP&E>                                          26,843
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,275)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,180
<BONDS>                                         16,448
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              798
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,092
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,169
<CGS>                                            8,534
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (44)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   395
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 692
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,590)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       877
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,560)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (129)
<CHANGES>                                          (36)
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,767)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.43)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32. 1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Valrico Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John E.
"Bob" Mclean, President and CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ John E. "Bob" Mclean
President and CEO
March 29, 2004
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-30706

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

versus

Robert Lee Thompson, Jr., 

Defendant—Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:07-CR-30034-1

Before Clement, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

In 2008, Robert Lee Thompson, Jr., federal prisoner # 66619-179,

pleaded guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute 50 grams 

or more of cocaine base, and the district court sentenced him to 240 months 

of imprisonment and a 10-year term of supervised release. In 2019, the 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 26, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-30706 Document: 00515616282 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2020
No. 19-30706

2

district court granted Thompson’s motion to be resentenced under the First 

Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194 (2018), and resentenced 

him to 180 months of imprisonment and an eight-year term of supervised 

release. 

The Government appeals, arguing that Thompson was ineligible for 

relief because eligibility for a sentence reduction under Section 404 of the 

First Step Act is based upon the actual offense conduct rather than the statute 

of conviction. We generally review a district court’s ruling on a motion for a 

sentence reduction under the First Step Act for abuse of discretion. United 

States v. Jackson, 945 F.3d 315, 319 (5th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, 2020 WL 

1906710 (U.S. Apr. 20, 2020) (No. 19-8036). However, when, as here, the 

district court’s “determination turns on the meaning of a federal statute,” 

our review is de novo. Jackson, 945 F.3d at 319 (internal quotation marks and 

citation omitted). 

The Government concedes this argument is foreclosed under our 

decision in Jackson but seeks to preserve the issue for further review. In that 

case, we held that “whether an offense is ‘covered’ [under the First Step 

Act] depends only on the statute under which the defendant was convicted.” 

Id. at 320. We are bound by prior Fifth Circuit decisions until the decision is 

explicitly or implicitly overruled by the Supreme Court or this court sitting 

en banc. United States v. Segura, 747 F.3d 323, 328 (5th Cir. 2014).

Accordingly the district court did not err in reducing Thompson’s sentence

under the First Step Act. See Jackson, 945 F.3d at 319-20. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

Case: 19-30706 Document: 00515616282 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2020
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-454-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

August 26, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 20, 1997, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be effective 
September 19, 1997:

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 1
Eighth Revised Sheet No. 2
Second Revised Sheet Nos. 132 and 138
Third Revised Sheet No. 144
Second Revised Sheet Nos. 145 and 146
First Revised Sheet No. 147
Original Sheet Nos. 148-150
Fourth Revised Sheet Nos. 210 and 230
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 233
Third Revised Sheet No. 234
Second Revised Sheet No. 452
First Revised Sheet No. 456A
Original Sheet Nos. 458E-458I
Third Revised Sheet No. 467
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 471

    WNG states that the purpose of this filing is to establish Rate 
Schedule IPS under which WNG will provide an interruptible pooling 
service on its system. WNG states that this service will be in addition 
to the DCPS pooling service required by the April 30 and July 21 
orders.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all 
jurisdictional customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or a protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 or 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23147 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# DLA Troop Support Subsistence supply chain director promoted to colonel

/ Published Oct. 26, 2018
PHILADELPHIA, 
An Army logistics officer assigned to the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support was promoted to colonel during a ceremony in Philadelphia Oct. 25

Col. Abel Young is the director of DLA Troop Support’s Subsistence supply chain. 

“Today is a great day for the Army, DLA and the Young family, celebrating your promotion to colonel,” said Brig. Gen. Mark Simerly, DLA Troop Support commander, who officiated the ceremony. 

Simerly said that reaching a milestone like attaining the rank of colonel isn’t possible without the support of family. 

“Thank you all for your unwavering support, not just today, but throughout Abel’s life and military career,” Simerly said to Young’s family in attendance. 

Young’s family has strong military ties. His father served in the Army during World War II.  One of his brothers is a retired Army lieutenant colonel, another brother is a retired Marine sergeant major, and another brother is a retired staff sergeant. His daughter is a cadet at the U.S Military Academy at West Point, New York.

Simerly said that Young has proven over the year that he’s led Subsistence that he deserves the promotion. 

“For more than 21 years, you’ve done your part to ensure that our soldiers were properly equipped for their missions,” Simerly said. “And of course, serving at DLA Troop Support means that the impact of your service has touched every American service member on the planet. Abel, you should be proud – you have earned this promotion.”

Young, a Chicago Heights, Illinois, native, thanked those in attendance for supporting him throughout his career and expressed how he felt in the moment.

“There are three sentences that describe how I feel right now,” Young said. “I’m am full of faith. I am blessed. And I am humbled.”

Young thanked his parents, family, friends and military leaders for making him the man he is today.

“Thank you, because I know that I did not get here by myself,” Young said. “To my wife, you’re the most valuable player on the team and no doubt that you’re a general.”