alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                  [H. J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. LETTERHEAD]

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                   CONSENT OF H. J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

         We hereby consent to the use of the name H.J. Gruy and Associates, Inc.
and of references to H.J. Gruy and Associates, Inc. and to the inclusion of and
references to our report, or information contained therein, dated April 7, 2000,
prepared for Queen Sand Resources, Inc. (now DevX Energy, Inc.) in the DevX
Energy, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period from July 1, 2000, to
December 31, 2000, for the filing dated March 30, 2001, and the incorporation by
reference into the applicable previous filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.


                                              H. J. GRUY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
                                              Texas Registration Number F-000637


                                              By:
                                                 -------------------------------
                                              Name:  Robert J. Naas
                                              Title: Executive Vice President


March 30, 2001
Dallas, Texas



RJN/cnm
132 STAT. 1242 PUBLIC LAW 115–158—MAR. 27, 2018 

Public Law 115–158 

115th Congress 

An Act 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to prohibit the use of Federal funds for 

the costs of painting portraits of officers and employees of the Federal Government, 

and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eliminating Government-funded 

Oil-painting Act’’ or the ‘‘EGO Act’’. 

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR PORTRAITS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter III of chapter 13 of title 31, 

United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘§ 1355. Prohibition on use of funds for portraits 

‘‘(a) No funds appropriated or otherwise made available to 

the Federal Government may be used to pay for the painting 

of a portrait of an officer or employee of the Federal Government, 

including the President, the Vice President, a Member of Congress, 

the head of an executive agency, or the head of an office of the 

legislative branch. 

‘‘(b) In this section— 

‘‘(1) the term ‘executive agency’ has the meaning given 

the term in section 133 of title 41; and 

‘‘(2) the term ‘Member of Congress’ includes a Delegate 

or Resident Commissioner to Congress.’’. 

(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections for subchapter 

31 USC 1301 III of chapter 13 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by 

prec. 

Definitions. 

31 USC 1355. 

Eliminating 

Governmentfunded 

Oil-painting Act. 

31 USC 1301 

note. 

Mar. 27, 2018 

[S. 188] 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
PUBLIC LAW 115–158—MAR. 27, 2018 132 STAT. 1243 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 188 (H.R. 1701): 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 115–511, Pt. 1, (Comm. on Oversight and Government Reform) accompanying H.R. 1701. 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 115–28 (Comm. on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 163 (2017): Sept. 18, considered and passed Senate. 

Vol. 164 (2018): Mar. 6, considered and passed House, amended. 

Mar. 14, Senate concurred in House amendments. 

Æ 

adding after the item relating to section 1354 the following new 

item: 

‘‘1355. Prohibition on use of funds for portraits.’’. 

Approved March 27, 2018. 


dkrause on DSKBC28HB2PROD with PUBLAWS
| I      hereby authorize Registrar and Transfer Company (Agent) to apply cash      dividends from Common Stock of Middlesex Water Company (Company)      registered in my name, and or credited to my account under this Plan, and      any optional cash payments made by me in accordance with the Plan, to the      purchase of full and fractional shares of the Company’s Common      Stock. Social      Security      Number                                                      Area      Code – Telephone NumberIf      name(s) and address is not preprinted above, please print your name      (exactly as it appears on your registered common stock) and      address. |  ̈ FULL DIVIDEND      REINVESTMENT on      all shares held. ̈ PARTIAL DIVIDEND      REINVESTMENT Reinvest      dividends on _____ shares of Common Stock registered in my      name. ̈ OPTIONAL CASH      PAYMENTSI wish to make an optional      cash payment to my Plan account.AMOUNT      ENCLOSED$__________(Personal      Check) StockholderStockholderDated:      __________________________________________________ |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
255 La. 561

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Harold L. BEARD v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 50448.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 12, 1970.

In re: Harold L. Beard applying for writ of habeas corpus and certiorari.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercises of either our supervisory or original jurisdiction.
#### Succession of James Ware GARDINER.

No. 61597.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1978.

In re: Katherine Garrison Brewer, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Calcasieu. 353 So.2d 484.

Writ denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130325 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

NICHOLE CLARK,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130325 

 COA: 263044 

Ionia CC: 00-020725-NO 

CLIFF HUCKLEBERRY and 

JUDY HUCKLEBERRY,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 18, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0424 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2006 

Clerk
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the Interest of R.H., T.H. a/k/a T.G., * From the 161st District

M.H., A.G., M.G., and E.H., children, Court of Ector County,

 Trial Court No. B-3228-PC.

No. 11-13-00356-CV * May 8, 2014

* Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the order

of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-1707

Plaintiff : 

(JUDGE MANNION)

v. :

 

JOHN DOE subscriber assigned :

IP address 73.175.208.90,

:

Defendant

:

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of this date, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT the court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Serve

Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference (Doc. 4), subject to

the conditions below:

1. Plaintiff may serve a Rule 45 subpoena upon the third party

internet service provider Comcast Cable (the “ISP”), for the

purpose of obtaining information necessary to identify the

individual assigned with the IP address 73.175.208.90

(“John Doe Defendant”), specifically his or her name and

address. The subpoena shall have a copy of this order

attached;

2. The ISP will have fourteen (14) days from the date of

service of the Rule 45 subpoena to serve the John Doe

Defendant with a copy of the subpoena and a copy of this

order. The ISP may serve the John Doe Defendant using

any reasonable means, including written notice sent to his

or her last known address, transmitted either by first-class

Case 3:15-cv-01707-MEM Document 7 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 2
mail or via overnight service;

3. The John Doe Defendant shall have fourteen (14) days

from the date of service of the Rule 45 subpoena to file any

motions with this court contesting the subpoena (including

a motion to quash or modify the subpoena). The ISP may

not turn over the John Doe Defendant’s identifying

information to Plaintiff before the expiration of this 28 day

period. Additionally, if the John Doe Defendant or ISP files

a motion to quash the subpoena, the ISP shall not produce

any information to Plaintiff until the court issues an order

instructing the ISP to resume production of the requested

discovery. If the John Doe Defendant moves to quash or

modify the subpoena, the John Doe Defendant shall

contemporaneously notify the ISP so that the ISP is on

notice not to release the John Doe Defendant’s contact

information to Plaintiff until the rules on any such motion;

4. If the 28 day period lapses without the John Doe

Defendant or ISP contesting the subpoena, the ISP shall

have fourteen (14) days to produce the information

responsive to the subpoena to Plaintiff;

5. The ISP shall preserve any subpoenaed information

pending the resolution of any timely-filed motion to quash;

6. Any information ultimately disclosed to Plaintiff in response

to a Rule 45 subpoena may be used by Plaintiff solely for

the purpose of litigating the instant case.

s/ Malachy E. Mannion 

MALACHY E. MANNION

United States District Judge

DATED: September 30, 2015

O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2015 MEMORANDA\15-1707-01-ORDER.wpd

2

Case 3:15-cv-01707-MEM Document 7 Filed 09/30/15 Page 2 of 2
#### Sandra B. LEE (Chapin) v. Haskel M. LEE.

No. 50322.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 26, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 24, 1978.

Reid & Hewitt, Floyd G. Hewitt, Jr., Biloxi, for appellant.

Bailey & Sadler, J. Allen Sadler, Ocean Springs, for appellee.

Before SUGG, WALKER and COFER, JJ., and LEON E. HANNAFORD, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED.
254 La. 814

#### Fred L. LEAVINES v. Mrs. Rena Page Newman LEAVINES.

No. 50062.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 23, 1969.

In re: Mrs. Rena Newman Leavines applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 224 So.2d 26.

The application is denied. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. See dissent in Montz v. Montz, 253 La. 897, 221 So.2d 40 at p. 43.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTether Dynamics SimulationThe proceedings of the conference are presented. The objective was to provide a forum for the discussion of the structure and status of existing computer programs which are used to simulate the dynamics of a variety of tether applications in space. A major topic was different simulation models and the process of validating them. Guidance on future work in these areas was obtained from a panel discussion; the panel was composed of resource and technical managers and dynamic analysts in the tether field. The conclusions of this panel are also presented.Document ID19870009388Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference ProceedingsDate AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1987Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNASA-CP-2458NAS 1.55:2458Accession Number87N18821Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870009388.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitleN87-18822 through N87-18824Workvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-141489) of ProgenPharmaceuticals Limited and in the related Prospectus of our reports dated August 28,2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Progen PharmaceuticalsLimited and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofProgen Pharmaceuticals Limited, included in this Annual Report on Form 20-Ffor the year ended June 30, 2008.

 

 
| /s/ Ernst & Young |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |   |
| Brisbane, Australia        |   |
|                       |   |
| January 13, 2009      |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 173 (Monday, September 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23698]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Regulatory Guide; Issuance, Availability

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a new guide in its 
Regulatory Guide Series. This series has been developed to describe and 
make available to the public such information as methods acceptable to 
the NRC staff for implementing specific parts of the Commission's 
regulations, techniques used by the staff in evaluating specific 
problems or postulated accidents, and data needed by the staff in its 
review of applications for permits and licenses.
    Regulatory Guide 3.70, ``Use of Fixed Neutron Absorbers at Fuels 
and Materials Facilities,'' provides guidance that is acceptable to the 
NRC staff on procedures for preventing criticality accidents by using 
fixed neutron absorbers in operations involving handling, storing, and 
transporting special nuclear fuels at fuels and materials facilities.
    Comments and suggestions in connection with items for inclusion in 
guides currently being developed or improvements in all published 
guides are encouraged at any time. Written comments may be submitted to 
the Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, 
Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, DC 20555.
    Regulatory guides are available for inspection at the Commission's 
Public Document Room, 2120 L Street NW., Washington, DC. Single copies 
of regulatory guides, both active and draft guides, may be obtained 
free of charge by writing the Office of Administration, Attn: Printing, 
Graphics and Distribution Branch, USNRC, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or 
by fax at (301) 415-5272. Issued guides may also be purchased from the 
National Technical Information Service on a standing order basis. 
Details on this service may be obtained by writing NTIS, 5285 Port 
Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. Regulatory guides are not 
copyrighted, and Commission approval is not required to reproduce them.

(5 U.S.C. 552(a))

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of August 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Malcolm R. Knapp,
Acting Director, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 97-23698 Filed 9-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, James Clark, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mind2Market, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of September 30, 2004; and

     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  November 16, 2004


/s/ James Clark
- -----------------------
James Clark, CEO & CFO
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23192]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION


Performance Review Board

    As required by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (Public Law 95-
454), Chairman Reed E. Hundt appointed the following executives to the 
Performance Review Board: Ruth Milkman, John Nakahata, Mary Beth 
Richards, Gerald Vaughan, Douglas Webbink.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23192 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 171 

To exempt seaplanes from certain transportation taxes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 26, 2005 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself, Mr. STEVENS, and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Finance 

A BILL

To exempt seaplanes from certain transportation taxes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM TAX FOR TRANSPORTATION 

4 PROVIDED BY SEAPLANES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4261 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to imposition of tax) is 

7 amended by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection (j) 

8 and by inserting after subsection (h) the following new 

9 subsection: 

10 ‘‘(i) EXEMPTION FOR TRANSPORTATION PROVIDED

11 BY SEAPLANES.—No tax shall be imposed by this section 
2

•S 171 IS

1 or section 4271 on any air transportation by a seaplane 

2 with respect to any segment consisting of a takeoff from, 

3 and a landing on, water.’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply to calendar years beginning after 

6 December 31, 2004.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         635
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         809
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 13,876
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      11,311
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        11,158
<LOANS>                                     47,801
<ALLOWANCE>                                    414
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              78,144
<DEPOSITS>                                  56,566
<SHORT-TERM>                                     0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            681
<LONG-TERM>                                  7,003
<COMMON>                                        14
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              78,144
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,914
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,625
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               126
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,665
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,418
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,808
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,857
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,798
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,216
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,216
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   866
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .75
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                3.74
<LOANS-NON>                                    202
<LOANS-PAST>                                    66
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               384
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    0
<RECOVERIES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              414
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        414


</TABLE>