alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 174 (Tuesday, September 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23802]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP-97-497-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
GAs Tariff

September 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 29, 1997, Koch Gateway Pipeline Company 
(Koch) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to become effective 
October 1, 1997.

2nd Rev Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 20
3rd Rev Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 21
3rd Rev Seventeenth Revised Sheet No. 22
2nd Rev Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 24

    Koch states that the above listed tariff sheets are being submitted 
to reflect the removal of its Sea Robin Pipeline Company Account No. 
858 surcharges from its currently effective tariff sheets. Koch is 
requesting an October 1, 1997 effective date, which corresponds with 
the end of the approved two year collection period.
    Koch also states that it has served copies of this filing upon each 
affected customer, state commission, and other interested parties.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's rules 
and regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
by Section 154.210 of the Commission's rules and regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a part must file a motion 
to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23802 Filed 9-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
CVD Abatement Units with Flow Data

TOOL# Test Date

Total Vol 

in SLPM

Total Vol 

out SLPM Dillution Factor DRE NF3 Mfr DRE

Install 

Date Comments

A 30-Aug 43.136 821.139 19.04 98.9 >70 6/4/2010

B 16-Aug 92.995 391.149 4.21 72.3 >70 2/20/2002

C 16-Aug 103.265 407.308 3.94 79.5 >70 4/14/2003

D 23-Aug 91.926 349.392 3.80 78.5 >70 4/14/2003

E 23-Aug 88.661 385.191 4.35 74.9 >70 4/14/2003

F 23-Aug 85.071 323.445 3.80 97.0 >70 4/14/2003

G 8-Jun 88.592 503.463 5.68 97.4 >99 5/4/2010

H 14-Sep 37.765 587.885 15.57 83.1 >70 2/11/2008

I 7-Jun 127.629 522.046 4.09 96.1 >99 10/15/2008

J 19-Sep 101.408 937.502 9.25 76.1 >70 7/2/2002

K 27-Jul 124.944 1300.149 10.41 50.5 >70 7/2/2002

K 27-Sep 142.171 1226.663 8.63 35.8 >70 7/2/2002 Retest

L 19-Sep 99.696 952.144 9.55 85.4 >70 7/2/2002

M 28-Sep 136.170 1031.208 7.57 82.0 >70 7/2/2002

N 11-May 110.523 419.133 3.79 94.1 >70 4/4/2002

O 10-May 88.243 1176.214 13.33 84.6 >70 4/7/2003

P 17-May 115.313 614.559 5.33 87.2 >70 3/6/2003

Q 13-Sep 161.419 564.117 3.50 99.9 >70 2/5/2009

R 18-May 147.923 663.519 4.49 85.5 >70 1/7/2003

S 16-Aug 170.283 477.204 2.80 91.1 >70 2/13/2003

T 26-Jul 106.457 561.975 5.28 99.8 >70 3/19/2008

U 12-May 188.100 628.200 3.34 49.6 >70 5/16/2002

U 7-Sep 174.718 721.771 4.13 63.4 >70 5/16/2002 Retest

V 4-Aug 307.834 989.341 3.21 100.0 >70 6/20/2007

W 5-Apr 130.540 520.660 3.99 100.0 >99 6/7/2010

X 15-Jun 72.720 564.336 7.76 100.0 >99 3/7/2003

Y 15-Jun 116.614 720.444 6.18 100.0 >99 3/7/2003

Z 4-May 47.463 796.450 16.78 99.9 >99 10/15/2004

AA 30-Aug 154.458 330.584 2.14 92.1 >70 3/10/2003

BB 14-Jun 142.660 546.008 3.83 100.0 >70 7/2/2002

CC 28-Apr 161.373 734.901 4.55 84.1 >70 5/3/2007

DD 24-Aug 161.373 734.901 4.55 84.1 >70 5/3/2007

EE 5-May 90.600 937.116 10.34 79.5 >70 7/17/2007

FF 19-May 122.418 1409.061 11.51 99.9 >70 6/4/2003

GG 9-Aug 145.910 1080.773 7.41 84.9 >70 3/10/2003

HH 24-May 130.770 935.490 7.15 100.0 >99 6/27/20007

JJ 26-Jul 260.651 806.402 3.09 99.9 >99 1/2/2010
Unassociated Document



Letter of Agreement


 


Party A:  Aoxin Tianli Group, Inc.


 


         Wuhan Aoxin Tianli Enterprise Investment Management Co., Ltd


 


Party B:  Xiangyang Guosheng Qirui Investment Co., Ltd.


 


Party C: Hubei Hang-ao Servo-valve Manufacturing Technology Co., Ltd.


 


WHEREAS, Party A holds 88% equity interest in Party C; Party B is an investment company established by the management group of Party C and holds 1,047,000 common shares of Party A after Party A acquired Party C in July, 2014. The 1,047,000 shares were deposited into escrow (the “Earn-out Shares”) to be held for disbursement to Party B upon Party C achieving certain Target Net Income in each of the fiscal years ending December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016.


 


WHEREAS, Party A intends to sell its 88% equity interest in Party C to a third party;


 


THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the friendly negotiations between Party A and B, the following agreement is entered:


 



	
  

	
1.

	
If Party A sells the above-mentioned equity interest successfully, the previous Escrow Agreement executed between Party A and Party B will be cancelled automatically and the 1,047,000 shares of Party A will be delivered to Party B. However, the Earn-out shares can’t be released until the end of March 2017 as previously promised in the Stock Purchase Agreement;







 



	
  

	
2.

	
If Party A doesn’t sell the above-mentioned equity interest successfully, the previous Escrow Agreement will continue to be effective.







 


Party A:  Aoxin Tianli Group, Inc.


 


        Wuhan Aoxin Tianli Enterprise Investment Management Co., Ltd (seal)


 


Legal person or authorized representative: (signature)


 


Party B: Xiangyang Guosheng Qirui Investment Co., Ltd. (seal)


 


Legal person or authorized representative: (signature)


 


                                         November 5, 2015
#### Harry E. ELLIS, Jr. and Mary Ellis, his wife, Appellants, v. Thelma WAKEFIELD, as Administratrix of the Estate of Elizabeth Wheeler, and individually, Appellee.

No. 71-74.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 5, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Lightbridge Corporation - Exhibit 10.3 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com





Exhibit 10.3

AMENDMENT

TO THE

LIGHTBRIDGE CORPORATION

2015 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

THIS AMENDMENT is made as of November 20, 2015, by Lightbridge
Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”).

WHEREAS, the Company has heretofore established and maintains
the Lightbridge Corporation 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”);

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13 of the Plan, the Board of
Directors has the authority to amend the Plan; and

WHEREAS, after determining that it is in the best interests of
the Company and its stockholders, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors approved, and the Board of Directors ratified and approved, an
amendment to Section 4.3 of the Plan to increase the individual limit for awards
thereunder.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is hereby amended
by restating Section 4.3 of the Plan in its entirety, effective immediately as
follows:

“4.3 Subject to
adjustment in accordance with Section 11, no Participant shall be granted,
during any one (1) year period, Options to purchase Common Stock and Stock
Appreciation Rights with respect to more than one million five hundred thousand
(1,500,000) shares of Common Stock in the aggregate or any other Awards with
respect to more than one million five hundred thousand (1,500,000) shares of
Common Stock in the aggregate. If an Award is to be settled in cash, the number
of shares of Common Stock on which the Award is based shall count toward the
individual share limit set forth in this Section 4.”
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 173 (Monday, September 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23723]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Maritime Administration
[Docket No. M-039]


Information Collection Available for Public Comments and 
Recommendations

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this 
notice announces the Maritime Administration's (MARAD's) intentions to 
request extension of approval for three years of a currently approved 
information collection.

DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before November 7, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Crawford Ellerbe, Office of Maritime 
Labor, Training and Safety, Maritime Administration, MAR-250, Room 
7302, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20590. Telephone 202-
366-5755 or FAX 202-493-2288. Copies of this collection can also be 
obtained from that office.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Title of Collection: U.S. Merchant Marine Academy Application for 
Admission and Pre-Candidate Application.
    Type of Request: Extension of currently approved information 
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2133-0010.
    Form Number: KP 3-4, and KP 2-65.
    Expiration Date of Approval: March 31, 1998.
    Summary of Collection of Information: The collection consists of 
form KP 3-4 (Pre-Candidate Application), and KP 2-65 (U.S. Merchant 
Marine Academy Application for Admission). These forms are completed by 
individuals wishing to be admitted as students to the U.S. Merchant 
Marine Academy and are reviewed by staff members of the Academy.
    Need and Use of the Information: The collected information is 
necessary to select the best qualified candidates for the U.S. Merchant 
Marine Academy.
    Description of Respondents: Individuals desiring to become students 
at the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy.
    Annual Responses: 2,500.
    Annual Burden: 5 hours.
    Comments: Send all comments regarding this information collection 
to Joel C. Richard, Department of Transportation, Maritime 
Administration, MAR-120, Room 7210, 400 Seventh Street, S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20590. Send comments regarding whether this 
information collection is necessary for proper performance of the 
function of the agency and will have practical utility, accuracy of the 
burden estimates, ways to minimize this burden, and ways to enhance 
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected.

    By Order of the Maritime Administrator.

    Dated: September 3, 1997.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23723 Filed 9-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P
#### Robert J. McCLAIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 69-48, 69-49.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 27, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 176 (Thursday, September 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-24138]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Upon written request, copies available are from: Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Filings and, Information Services, 
Washington, D.C. 20549.

Revision

(Form 13F--SEC File No. 270-22--OMB Control No. 3235-0006

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (the ``Commission'') has submitted for OMB approval a 
revision to Form 13F [17 CFR 249.325] under the Securities Exchange Act 
of 1934.
    Form 13F is used by certain large investment managers to report 
quarterly with respect to certain securities over which they exercise 
investment discretion. Each report takes about 24.7 hours to fill out.
    It is estimated that approximately 1, 804 institutional investment 
managers are subject to the rule. Each reporting managers files Form 
13F quarterly. It is also estimated that, each quarter, following the 
expiration of grants of confidential treatment, 50 managers will re-
submit electronically information previously submitted in paper. It is 
estimated that compliance with the form's requirements imposes a total 
annual average burden per manager of approximately 98.8 hours for 
submitting the report, and an additional annual burden of 4 hours (one 
additional burden hour per manager per quarter) for the 50 managers re-
submitting information previously filed. The total annual burden for 
all managers is estimated at 178,435.2 hours. The estimate of average 
burden hours is made solely for the purposes of the Paperwork Reduction 
Act and is based on the Commission's experience with similar filings 
and discussions with a few registrants.
    Direct general comments to the OMB Desk Officer for the Commission 
at the address below. Any comments concerning the accuracy of the 
estimated average burden hours for compliance with Commission rules and 
forms should be directed to Michael E. Bartell, Associate Executive 
Director, Office of Information Technology, Securities and Exchange 
Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, and the 
Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 3208, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, D.C. 20503.

    Dated: September 4, 1997.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-24138 Filed 9-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
#### STATE ex rel. GULF AMERICAN CORPORATION v. Chief Judge Woodie A. LILES et al.

No. 39088.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 1969.

Prohibition denied without opinion.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOptical elements formed by compressed gases:  Analysis and potential applicationsSpherical, cylindrical, and conical shock waves are optically analogous to gas lenses. The geometrical optics of these shock configurations are analyzed as they pertain to flow visualization instruments, particularly the rainbow schlieren apparatus and single-pass interferometers. It is proposed that a lens or mirror formed by gas compressed between plastic sheets has potential as a fluid visualization test object; as the objective mirror in a very large space-based telescope, communication antenna, or energy collector; as the objective mirror in inexpensive commercial telescopes; and as a component in fluid visualization apparatuses.Document ID19860012919Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsHowes, W. L.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1986Subject CategoryOpticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-2555NAS 1.60:2555E-2561Accession Number86N22390Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-40-14Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860012919.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Sigmund Anderman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Ellie Mae, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(e) and 15d15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Sigmund Anderman                                       
|Sigmund Anderman Chief
Executive Officer Date: May 13, 2011
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-10381

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jonathan Pineda-Diaz, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:20-CR-4-10

______________________________

Before Jolly, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jonathan Pineda-Diaz has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Pineda-Diaz has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 28, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10381 Document: 00516912296 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/28/2023
No. 23-10381

2

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-10381 Document: 00516912296 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/28/2023
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed June 29, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-762

Lower Tribunal No. F81-16888C

________________

Alberto Gomez,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ramiro C. Areces, Judge.

Alberto Gomez, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Dimple E. GILYARD, Appellant, v. S. S. KRESGE COMPANY, d/b/a K-Mart Number 4420, A Foreign Corporation, Appellee.

No. HH-17.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 3, 1978.

Benny R. S. Harris, Ocala, for appellant.

Robert A. Vostrejs, Jr., of Pattillo, Mac-Kay & McKeever, Ocala, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See *Page v. Staley,*226 So.2d 129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 46957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23550]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-473-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes 
in FERC Gas Tariff

August 29, 1997.
    Take notice that on August 26, 1997, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing to become part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff 
sheets, bearing a proposed effective date of September 1, 1997:

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 280
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 281
Third Revised Sheet No. 283

    Columbia states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's Order No. 636-C wherein the Commission established 
five years as the maximum length contract term that must be matched by 
a shipper exercising its right of first refusal. In Order No. 636-C, 
the Commission further directed pipelines to reflect this five-year 
term matching cap in their right of first refusal tariff provisions 
within 180 days from issuance of Order No. 636-C. Columbia states that 
it has revised its General Terms and Conditions Sections 4.1(c)(1), (4) 
and 4.2(d) to provide that the longest contract term that a shipper 
exercising its right of first refusal must match is five years.
    Columbia states that copies of its filing have been mailed to all 
firm customers, interruptible customers, and affected state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
regulations. All such interventions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceedings. Any person wishing to become a party must file a 
motion to intervene. A copy of this filing is on file with the 
Commission and is available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-23550 Filed 9-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M