alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (34,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2 

STATEMENT OF ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350 

    I, Anita K. Ho, the acting chief financial officer of Alliance  Fiber Optic  Products,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),  certify for thepurposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,
    (i)                 the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended          June 30, 2004 (the “Report”), fully complies with the          requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

    (ii)                 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
   By           /s/ Anita K. Ho                                        Anita K. Ho   August 12, 2004
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF 

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACTOF 2002 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Adolor Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endingJune 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Michael R. Dougherty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/Michael R. Dougherty 

Michael R. Dougherty
### Hydrogeologic framework of the Willamette Lowland aquifer system, Oregon and Washington

By: D. G. WoodwardMarshall W. Gannett**J. J. Vaccaro

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1424B

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No. 8976.

#### Carlin *v.*The City of Findlay.

(Decided March 13, 1906.)

Error to Circuit Court of Hancock county.

*Messrs. J. A. é E. V. Bo'pe,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Thomas W. Long,*solicitor, and *Mr. A. Black-ford,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
**Statement of Acting Chief FINANCIAL Officer under 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Anita K. Ho, the acting chief financial officer of Alliance Fiber Optic Products, Inc. (the “Company”), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,                   (i)     the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and           

(ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

> 
          /s/Anita K. Ho               

          Anita K. Ho

         August 12, 2009
- 350 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

311 Nebraska Reports

POPE v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

Cite as 311 Neb. 350

Colt M. Pope, appellant, v. Department 

of Motor Vehicles of the State 

of Nebraska, appellee.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed April 15, 2022. No. S-21-206.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Clay County: Stephen 

R. Illingworth, Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for 

rehearing overruled.

T. Charles James, of Langvardt, Valle & James, P.C., L.L.O., 

for appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Milissa JohnsonWiles for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, 

Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by 

the appellant, Colt M. Pope, concerning our opinion in Pope 

v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 310 Neb. 971, 969 N.W.2d 

903 (2022).

We overrule the motion, but modify the opinion as follows:

In the analysis section, under the subheading “OTHER 

ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR,” we modify the fourth paragraph to add as the final sentence the following: “We make 

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

06/03/2022 12:07 AM CDT
- 351 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

311 Nebraska Reports

POPE v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

Cite as 311 Neb. 350

no comment on any prohibitions or obligations under Neb. Rev. 

Stat. § 84-914(6) (Reissue 2014), as Pope has not assigned as 

error, nor has he argued he was prejudiced by, any purported 

violation of that statute.”

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

Motion for rehearing overruled.
#### Shireley McNAMARA, Secretary of the Department of Revenue and Taxation, State of Louisiana v. LESLIE ARDOIN, INC.

No. 62218.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 2, 1978.

In re: Leslie Ardoin, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Evangeline. 357 So.2d 1317.

Denied.

SANDERS, C. J. and SUMMERS, J., would grant the writ.
255 La. 543

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Louis O. KIMBALL et al. v. Dr. Thomas S. LEARY et al. and Honorable Clement M. Moss, Judge, Fourteenth Judicial District.

No. 50418.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 1970.

In re: Louis O. Kimball, Ricky P. Hamberlin and Sidney B. Richard applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

The application is denied. Applicants are not entitled to the relief sought.

BARHAM, J.,

concurs. Ony a suspen-sive appeal is sought, they are discretionary when warranted, but in this instance there is nothing to suspend or to suspensively appeal from. We can not reach the merits.
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
I, Robert Waters, Director and the Chief Financial Officer of Golden Spirit
Mining Ltd., a Delaware Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 22, 2004


/s/ Robert Waters
-----------------------
Robert Waters
Director and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED
STATES
 SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington,
D.C. 20549
 
 FORM
8-K
 
 CURRENT
REPORT
 
 Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
 Date of
Report (Date of earliest event reported) July 21, 2008
 
 NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL
CORPORATION
 (Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
 
 United
      States
              0-50876
              65-1233977(State
      or other jurisdiction of
              (Commission
              (IRS
      Employerincorporation)
              File
      Number)
              Identification
      No.)
 
 
 333 Church Street,
      Naugatuck, Connecticut
              06770(Address
      of principal executive offices)
              (Zip
      Code)
 
 (203)
720-5000
 (Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
 
 Not
Applicable
 (Former
name or former address, if changed since last report)
 
 
 Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions:
 
 o  Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 
 o  Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)
 
 o  Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
 
 oPre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))
   
  Item
2.02       Results of Operations and Financial
Condition
  On July
21, 2008, Naugatuck
Valley Financial Corporation (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing
itsfinancial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.  For
more information, reference is made to the Company’s press release dated July
21, 2008, a copy of which is attached to this Report as Exhibit 99.1 and is
furnished herewith.
  Item  9.01  
    Financial Statements and Exhibits
  (d)
              The
      following exhibit is filed
herewith:
  Exhibit
      99.1                       
      Press Release dated July 21, 2008
 
 
 
 
 
  
  SIGNATURES
 
 Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
 
 
 NAUGATUCK
      VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATIONDate:
      July 21, 2008
              By:
              /s/
      John C. RomanJohn
      C. RomanPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification**I, John D. Doherty, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Central Bancorp, Inc.,certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Central Bancorp, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.February 14, 2006     /s/ John D. Doherty     John D. Doherty
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1665 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1665

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on a certain ion exchange 
                                 resin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2005

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on a certain ion exchange 
                                 resin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON ION EXCHANGE RESIN COMPRISING A 
              COPOLYMER OF STYRENE CROSSLINKED WITH DIVINYLBENZENE, 
              SULPHONIC ACID, SODIUM FORM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.34 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         331
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    19,912
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20,243
<PP&E>                                         42,801
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (19,016)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 324,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          357,577
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,782
<OTHER-SE>                                     (85,623)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   324,736
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               284
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               350,926
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (350,913)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (350,913)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (350,913)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.02)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the License Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,
2005 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date:  August 8, 2005
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 176

AN ACT

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction

of a hydroelectric project in the State of Alaska.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 176 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY

2 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT.

3 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section

4 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would

5 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com6 mission project numbered 11480, the Commission may, at

7 the request of the licensee for the project, and after rea8 sonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due dili9 gence, and public interest requirements of that section and

10 the Commission’s procedures under that section extend

11 the time period during which the licensee is required to

12 commence the construction of the project for 3 consecutive

13 2-year periods beyond the date that is 4 years after the

14 date of issuance of the license.

Passed the Senate July 26, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 176

AN ACT

To extend the deadline for commencement of conof Alaska. struction of a hydroelectric project in the State
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Samuel HUMPHREY and Ray Anthony Lane.

No. 60452.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 2, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ denied. Ruling of the trial judge is correct.
#### Dean MATTHEWS, Appellant, v. Stuart J. PAGE, Appellee.

No. 76-1384.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 31, 1978.

Nathan Loeb, Orlando, for appellant.

Richard A. Wagner and Martin R. Satava of Rodgers, Rodgers, Wagner & Satava, Orlando, for appellee.

ALDERMAN, Chief Judge.

This appeal comes to us from a directed verdict in favor of the defendant, whom the plaintiff sued for conversion of a Great Dane trailer and for unlawfully terminating a purchase agreement without proper notice. We reverse.

When Page agreed to sell the trailer to Matthews, the following agreement was signed by the two parties on December 12, 1974.

> Mr. Matthews agrees to purchase above trailer in amount of $6400.00. He agrees *459to pay $500.00 down and to pay a minimum of $400.00 per month until the total amount is paid for.

There was testimony that Matthews paid, in addition to the $500 down payment, $689 in December 1974, $950 in January 1975, and $410 in February 1975, a total of $2,049. The buyer made no payments in March or April 1975, and in early April the seller repossessed the trailer.

We find that the written agreement is ambiguous to the extent that it might or might not be read to mean that payments in excess of $400 in one month could be applied to future months when the $400 minimum was not paid. Matthews testified that there was just such an oral agreement between him and Page, whieh should have resulted in the application of the excess payments made in December, January, and February to make up the minimum payments for March and April.

Because there was evidence upon which the jury could lawfully have found for the plaintiff, the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant. *Florida East Coast Ry. Co. v. Britt,*347 So.2d 122 (Fla.4th DCA 1977).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, J., and GREEN, OLIVER L., Associate Judge, concur.
254 La. 805

#### Olga KENNY, wife of/and Paul MALONEY, Jr. v. OAK BUILDERS, INC., et al.

No. 50060.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 23, 1969.

In re: Oak Builders, Inc. and Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 224 So.2d 161.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

Granted but limited to the issue of attorney fees.