alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


I, Gunther Than, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of View Systems,
Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

       (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

       (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

       (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

       (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

       (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.



                                       /S/ Gunther Than
Date: February 3, 2006                 ____________________________________
                                       Gunther Than, Chief Executive Officer
255 La. 551

#### Mrs. Vera MOAK et al. v. LINK-BELT COMPANY et al.

No. 50387.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 12, 1970.

In re: American Mutual Liability Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 229 So.2d 395.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

The application is granted but limited to a consideration of the correctness of that portion of the Court of Appeal’s judgment set forth in paragraphs (1), (2) and (3) of its decree. In all other respects the application for certiorari is denied.

BARHAM, J., does not participate.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe determination of exhaust cloud dimensions from films of space shuttle launchesPrinciples of photogrammetry are used to calculate the dimension of ground clouds produced from the Space Shuttle launch system. For each of three launches (Missions 41C, 41D, and 51A), a 16 mm camera recorded the ground cloud from three different locations. Measurements were made from outlines of the cloud and other features of interest which were traced onto paper at one-minute intervals using a 16 mm stop-action projector. Cloud characteristics such as top, max width at top, average width, and base are presented as a function of time. A temperature inversion was present each launch day and the cloud responded by first rising into the inversion and then descending to about the inversion height. Max tops were achieved in about three to five minutes and ranged from 2200 m for Mission 41C to 3500 m for Mission 41D. Cloud bases rose steadily to between 700 and 1000 m after 10 minutes. Average widths ranged from 500 to 1700 m depending on mission and camera. Photographs of digitizations of selected film frames are included in the report to show the irregular cloud shapes. Error sources for this analysis are also discussed.Document ID19880005118Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsZak, R. A.*(ST Systems Corp. Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1987Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryEnvironment PollutionReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-4103NAS 1.26:4103Accession Number88N14500Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-36715Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19880005118.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 172 (Friday, September 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 47040]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


Emergency Exemption: Issuance

    On August 21, 1997, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) 
issued a permit (PRT-833379) to the Buffalo Zoo (Zoo), Buffalo, New 
York to export a female gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) to the Granby Zoo in 
Granby, Quebec, Canada. The 30-day public comment period required by 
section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act was waived. The Service 
determined that an emergency affecting the health and life of the 
gorilla existed and that no reasonable alternative was available to the 
applicant, for the following reasons:
    a. The Buffalo Zoo applied for an export permit for the female 
gorilla who is suddenly not compatible with the gorilla social groups 
at the Zoo. The Zoo has only one gorilla facility with three social 
groups. Although she would like to be with the primary male, she has 
been rejected by the other females who have attained a higher status 
than she. She has taken her ostracism poorly and will not fit in with 
the other two groups. She has caused injuries to the other animals in 
all three groups.
    b. The Zoo is currently confining her to one of the four holding 
areas available. Because of the facility's configuration, she is still 
in close proximity to the other animals. This proximity is harming her 
psychologically; she is no longer eating, and is suffering physically.
    c. The Granby Zoo, which had loaned this gorilla to the Buffalo 
Zoo, has offered to have her return.

    Dated: August 29, 1997.
Mary Ellen Amtower,
Acting Chief, Branch of Permits, Office of Management Authority.
[FR Doc. 97-23516 Filed 9-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
EXHIBIT 23.1





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT





We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statements 333-21745, 333-39225, 333-67925 and 333-89816 of BWAY Corporation on Form S-8 of our report dated November 1, 2002 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to BWAY
Corporations proposed merger), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BWAY Corporation for the year ended September 29, 2002.





/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





Deloitte & Touche LLP


Atlanta, Georgia


December 30, 2002
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-61167 Summary Calendar

TUAN CHAU PHAM Petitioner

v. MICHAEL B MUKASEY, U S ATTORNEY GENERAL Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A37 341 363
Before KING, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Tuan Chau Pham is a native and citizen of Vietnam who was ordered deported from this country based on a determination that he had committed aggravated felonies that were crimes ofviolence. Pham moved to reopen his case and argued that he was eligible for relief under former 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c). The immigration judge denied both Pham’s motion to reopen and his subsequent motion for reconsideration, and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirmed the immigration judge. Pham now petitions this court for review. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 21, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 05-61167

2 Pham will receive reliefonly ifhe shows that the BIA abused its discretion when it affirmed the denial of his motion. See S ingh v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 484, 487 (5th Cir. 2006). Pham argues that the BIA’s application offormer § 1182(c) is contrary to INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 295 (2001), and violative of his equal protection rights. These arguments are unavailing. See Brieva-Perez v. Gonzales, 482 F.3d 356, 359 (5th Cir. 2007); Vo v. Gonzales, 482 F.3d 363, 366-70 (5th Cir. 2007). Pham’s petition for review is DENIED.
#### Charles McCASKILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1516.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 1, 1977.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Stuart A. Young, Asst. Public Defender, Frank B. Kessler, Chief, Asst. Public Defender, Appellate Division, Randall Decker, Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert L. Bogen, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The sentence imposed by the trial court is hereby modified and reduced to a total of five years, two years in prison followed by three years of probation. The terms of probation are affirmed. See *Pace v. State,*350 So.2d 1075, Fla. 4th DCA No. 76-2010, opinion filed October 11, 1977.

Affirmed as modified.

ANSTEAD and DOWNEY, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.
EXHIBIT 32


                               CERTIFICATION UNDER
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         To my  knowledge,  this  Report on Form 10-Q for the six  months  ended
September 30, 2004 of Central  Bancorp,  Inc. (the "Report") fully complies with
the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934,  and the  information  contained in this Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,   the  consolidated   financial  condition  and  results  of
operations of Central Bancorp, Inc.



                                   By:  /s/ John D. Doherty
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        John D. Doherty
                                        Chairman, President
                                        and Chief Executive Officer



                                   By:  /s/ Paul S. Feeley
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Paul S. Feeley
                                        Senior Vice President, Treasurer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer


Date:  November 15, 2004
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           Subsidiaries of the Company

                                                                State of
        Name of Subsidiary                                      Incorporation
        ------------------                                      -------------
        Source-Yeager Industries, Inc.                         Delaware
        Source-US Marketing Services, Inc.                     Delaware
        Brand Corporation                                      New York
        TCE Corporation                                        Delaware
        Vail Companies                                         Delaware
        Source-MYCO, Inc.                                      Delaware
        Source-Chestnut Display Systems, Inc.                  Delaware
        Source-Canada Corp.                                    Canada
        Aaron Wire & Metal Products, Ltd.                      Canada
        Source-Huck Store Fixture Company                      Delaware
        Huck Store Fixture Company of North Carolina           North Carolina
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.6



                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                        INTEGRATED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.


         Integrated Security Systems, Inc., a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify that:

         FIRST: The name of the Corporation is Integrated Security Systems, Inc.

         SECOND: The Board of Directors of the Corporation, by the unanimous
written consent of its members, adopted a resolution proposing and declaring
advisable that the number of authorized shares of the Corporation's Common
Stock, par value $.01 per share, be increased from 35,000,000 shares to
75,000,000 by adopting the following amendment to the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation:

                  Article FOURTH shall be amended in its entirety as follows:

                  "FOURTH: The total number of shares of stock which the
         Corporation shall have authority to issue is 75,750,000 shares, of
         which 75,000,000 shares shall be Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
         ("Common Stock"), and 750,000 shares shall be Preferred Stock, par
         value $.01 per share ("Preferred Stock")."

         THIRD: The resolution adopted by the Board of Directors has been duly
adopted by vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Common Stock and
Series D $20 convertible preferred stock, voting together as a class, at the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders duly called and held in accordance with the
provisions of Sections 211 and 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware, as an amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation.

         FOURTH: The aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
applicable provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Integrated Security Systems, Inc. has caused this
certificate to be signed by its Chief Executive Officer and attested to by
Secretary, as of May 10, 2001.

                               INTEGRATED SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.


                               By:  /s/ C. A. Rundell, Jr.
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    C. A. Rundell, Jr.
                                    Chief Executive Officer
### Geochemistry of the northern Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifer system

By: L. L. KnobelF. H. ChapelleHarold Meisler

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1404L

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 7**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 8**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Skip to Content

        -   Log in            -  Log inEmailPassword Show Password	            Remember meAlready have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Forgot your password?Email Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Resend confirmation instructionsEmail Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -   Sign Up            -  Sign upEmail Password Passwords must be at least 6 characters and contain at least one lower-case letter, one upper-case letter, one number, and one punctuation mark or symbolPassword confirmation  Show Password            Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 

# Search Publications

- Home

#           Hog Outlook            ERS

In 1997, ERS expanded Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook to include information formerly contained in Hog Outlook. The final issue of Hog Outlook was published October 15, 1996. This archive report contains detailed analysis and data on the hog sector, focusing on production, slaughter, price, and trade statistics.

----

Frequency of Release:Other

----

Category:Animals and Animal Products:Livestock

Keywords:pig feedersproduction costsslaughterswine

----

## Releases

| Oct 15, 1996 | TXT | Oct 15, 1996: Hog Outlook detailsx                Oct 15, 1996: Hog OutlookRelease datetime:Oct 15, 1996Close |
|--------------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Contact person name:Mildred Haley

Contact office name:Economic Research Service

Contact email:mildred.haley@usda.gov

##         Agency Announcements        
Do you also want to subscribe to all agency announcements from ?
NoYesFooter content with page navigation, site information, and copyright.-  Home 
-  Release Calendar 
×Release CalendarClose
-  About
-  Help 
-  Contact 
-  API 

The USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System (ESMIS) contains over 2,100 publications from five agencies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). These materials cover U.S. and international agriculture and related      topics. Mann Library at Cornell University developed and maintains this site.

© 2024 USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System
USDA ESMIS partners list with links to their websites.Partners:- Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
- Economic Research Service (ERS)
- Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS)
- National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
- World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB)
- 
- Albert R. Mann Library, Cornell University
- United States Department of Agriculture
Cornell development contact information.Developed & supported by:
**Albert R. Mann Library**Cornell UniversityIthaca, NY 14853-4301 Phone: (607) 255-3296 Email: usda-help@cornell.edu
254 La. 1101

#### Charles E. and Martha F. WATERS v. PHARR BROS., INC., et al.

No. 50201.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 19, 1969.

In re: Charles E. Waters and Martha F. Waters applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 228 So.2d 91.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           57687
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 86283
<PP&E>                                          122351
<DEPRECIATION>                                   12327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  263807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            91600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       2000
<COMMON>                                         11654
<OTHER-SE>                                      158553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    263807
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                125000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1494535
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1427035)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1427035)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1427035)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.12)


</TABLE>
#### MESCO METAL BUILDING CORP. v. CLINTON MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT.

No. 49746.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 23, 1977.

David K. .McGowan, Jackson, for appellant.

Fox & Gowan, John H. Fox, III, Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; Russel D. Moore, Judge.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and ROBERTSON and SUGG, JJ.

AFFIRMED.