alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MALIBU MEDIA, LLC, :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-1711

Plaintiff : 

(JUDGE MANNION)

v. :

 

JOHN DOE subscriber assigned :

IP address 174.60.242.27,

:

Defendant

:

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of this date, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED THAT the court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Serve

Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference (Doc. 4), subject to

the conditions below:

1. Plaintiff may serve a Rule 45 subpoena upon the third party

internet service provider Comcast Cable (the “ISP”), for the

purpose of obtaining information necessary to identify the

individual assigned with the IP address 174.60.242.27

(“John Doe Defendant”), specifically his or her name and

address. The subpoena shall have a copy of this order

attached;

2. The ISP will have fourteen (14) days from the date of

service of the Rule 45 subpoena to serve the John Doe

Defendant with a copy of the subpoena and a copy of this

order. The ISP may serve the John Doe Defendant using

any reasonable means, including written notice sent to his

or her last known address, transmitted either by first-class

Case 3:15-cv-01711-MEM Document 8 Filed 09/30/15 Page 1 of 2
mail or via overnight service;

3. The John Doe Defendant shall have fourteen (14) days

from the date of service of the Rule 45 subpoena to file any

motions with this court contesting the subpoena (including

a motion to quash or modify the subpoena). The ISP may

not turn over the John Doe Defendant’s identifying

information to Plaintiff before the expiration of this 28 day

period. Additionally, if the John Doe Defendant or ISP files

a motion to quash the subpoena, the ISP shall not produce

any information to Plaintiff until the court issues an order

instructing the ISP to resume production of the requested

discovery. If the John Doe Defendant moves to quash or

modify the subpoena, the John Doe Defendant shall

contemporaneously notify the ISP so that the ISP is on

notice not to release the John Doe Defendant’s contact

information to Plaintiff until the rules on any such motion;

4. If the 28 day period lapses without the John Doe

Defendant or ISP contesting the subpoena, the ISP shall

have fourteen (14) days to produce the information

responsive to the subpoena to Plaintiff;

5. The ISP shall preserve any subpoenaed information

pending the resolution of any timely-filed motion to quash;

6. Any information ultimately disclosed to Plaintiff in response

to a Rule 45 subpoena may be used by Plaintiff solely for

the purpose of litigating the instant case.

s/ Malachy E. Mannion 

MALACHY E. MANNION

United States District Judge

DATED: September 30, 2015

O:\Mannion\shared\MEMORANDA - DJ\CIVIL MEMORANDA\2015 MEMORANDA\15-1711-01-ORDER.wpd

2

Case 3:15-cv-01711-MEM Document 8 Filed 09/30/15 Page 2 of 2
ex1011.htm


Exhibit 10.8

UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE




                                                                                                                


October 12, 2015








U.S. $150,000.00 




 









FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Eos Petro, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Issuer”), hereby promises to pay to the order of Plethora Enterprises, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company (the “Payee”), at such place as the Payee shall direct in writing, the principal sum of One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00), with interest at 10.00% on the unpaid balance.  All references to Dollars herein are to lawful currency of the United States of America.







All unpaid principal of this Note and accrued interest shall be due and payable on January 1, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”). This Note may be prepaid at any time in whole or in part without penalty.







In any action at law or in equity to enforce or construe any provisions or rights under this Note, the unsuccessful party or parties to such litigation, as determined by a court pursuant to a final offer, judgment or decree, shall pay to the successful party or parties all costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by such successful party.







This Note and all actions arising out of or in connection with this Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions of the State of California, or of any other state.







 

 







Eos Petro, Inc.


A Nevada corporation












By: /s/ Nicholas Konstant


    Nicholas Konstant


    Its: Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUP R EME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: REESTABLISHMENT OF THE

MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTS WITHIN

THE 44 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF

THE COMMONWEALTH OF

PENNSYLVANIA :

:

:

: NO. 511

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13 th day of September 20 22 , upon consideration of the Petition to

Reestablish the Magisterial Districts of the 44 th Judicial District (Wyoming and Sullivan

Count ies ) of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, it is hereby ORDERED AND

DECREED that the Petition, which provides for the re alignment of Magisterial Districts

44

- 3

- 01 , and 44

- 3

- 02 , within Wyoming County, to be effective January 2, 2023 is granted ;

and that the Petition, w hich provides for the reestablishment of Magisterial District 44

- 3

-

03 within Sullivan County, to be effective immediately, is granted

.

Said Magisterial Districts shall be as follows:

Magisterial District 44

- 3

- 01

Magisterial District Judge David K. Plummer Factoryville Borough

Meshoppen Borough

Nicholson Borough

Clinton Township

Lemon Township

Meshoppen Township

Nicholson Township

Overfield Township

Tunkhannock Borough

Washington Township- 2

-

Magisterial District 44

- 3

- 02

Magisterial District Judge Carl W. Smith, Jr. Laceyville Borough

Braintrim Township

Eaton Township

Exeter Township

Falls Township

Forkston Township

Mehoopany Township

Monroe Township

North Branch Township

Northmoreland Township

Noxen Township

Tunkhannock Township

Windham Township

Magisterial District 44

- 3

- 03

Magisterial District Judge Jennifer Y. Vandine Dushore Borough

Eagles Mere Borough

Forksville Borough

Laporte Borough

Cherry Township

Colley Township

Davidson Township

Elkland Township

Forks Township

Fox Township

Hillsgrove Township

Laporte Township

Shrewsbury Township
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Morris OSELEN.

No. 61742.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 28, 1978.

Robert J. Zibilich and Forrest L. Bethay, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Philip J. Boudousque, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# 2018 Command Open House Holiday Photos

/ Published Dec. 12, 2018
COLUMBUS, Ohio, 
Pictures from the 2018 DLA Land and Maritime Open House holiday event in the Command Suite are now available at eWorkplace on SharePoint Online. 

The photos can be found at **Land and Maritime > DSCC images > 2018 Command Open House** or at https://go.usa.gov/xPhJh

*Please note that the links are CAC enabled.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

      RULE 13a - 14(b) CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
                                FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officers of Source Interlink
Companies, Inc. (the "Corporation") hereby certify that the Corporation's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Corporation.

Dated: April 18, 2005

/s/ S. LESLIE FLEGEL
------------------------------------------
Name:  S. Leslie Flegel
Title: Chief Executive Officer

/s/ MARC FIERMAN
------------------------------------------
Name:  Marc Fierman
Title: Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 136080 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 136080 COA: 276166 Kent CC: 06-006769-FH STEVEN BERNARD BOGARD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 13, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t0616 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 23, 2008

Clerk
569 S.E.2d 72

#### Thomas Michael HOLSAPPLE, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellee.

Record No. 3078-00-2.

Court of Appeals of Virginia.

Sept. 3, 2002.

Before the Full Court.

UPON A PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

On July 23, 2002 came the appellant, by retained counsel, and filed a petition praying that the Court set aside the judgment rendered herein on July 9, 2002, and grant a rehearing *en banc*thereof.

On consideration whereof, the petition for rehearing *en banc*is granted, the mandate entered herein on July 9, 2002 is stayed pending the decision of the Court *en banc,*and the appeal is reinstated on the docket of this Court.

The parties shall file briefs in compliance with Rule 5A:35. The appellant shall attach as an addendum to the opening brief upon rehearing *en banc*a copy of the opinion previously rendered by the Court in this matter. It is further ordered that the appellant shall file with the clerk of this Court twelve additional copies of the appendix previously filed in this case.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1853 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1853

To amend the National Energy Conservation Policy Act to require Federal 
   agencies to take certain actions to reduce employee vehicle fuel 
                  consumption, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 6, 2005

  Mr. Salazar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Energy Conservation Policy Act to require Federal 
   agencies to take certain actions to reduce employee vehicle fuel 
                  consumption, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reduce Government Fuel Consumption 
Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF EMPLOYEE VEHICLE FUEL CONSUMPTION BY FEDERAL 
              AGENCIES.

    Section 543 of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act (42 
U.S.C. 8253) (as amended by section 103 of the Energy Policy Act of 
2005 (Public Law 109-58)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(f) Reduction of Employee Vehicle Fuel Consumption by Federal 
Agencies.--
            ``(1) In general.--Each agency shall take such actions as 
        are necessary to reduce the level of fuel consumed by vehicles 
        of employees of the agency (other than fuel used for military 
        purposes), in connection with the employment of the employees, 
        by (to the maximum extent practicable) at least 10 percent 
        during the 1-year period beginning on the date of enactment of 
        this subsection.
            ``(2) Methods.--An agency may use such methods as the 
        agency determines are appropriate to achieve the target 
        established by paragraph (1), including--
                    ``(A) telework;
                    ``(B) carpooling;
                    ``(C) bicycling and walking to work;
                    ``(D) fuel-efficient trip planning;
                    ``(E) public transportation use; and
                    ``(F) limiting travel days for vehicle travel 
                outside the office.
            ``(3) Measurement.--An agency may use such measures as the 
        agency determines are appropriate to determine whether the 
        agency has achieved the target established by paragraph (1), 
        including--
                    ``(A) a reduction in travel vehicle travel miles 
                reimbursed by the agency; and
                    ``(B) certification of the methods described in 
                paragraph (2).''.
                                 <all>
```
# Adderly selected as Jacksonville distribution center deputy

/ Published March 15, 2018
JACKSONVILLE, Fla., 
Richard Adderly has been selected to serve as deputy commander of DLA Distribution Jacksonville, Florida.

A native of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Adderly enlisted in the U.S. Air Force in 1983, where he spent four years as an inventory management specialist.  He served at Pease Air Force Base, New Hampshire; King Salmon Air Base, Alaska; and Plattsburgh Air Force Base, New York, supporting the Strategic Air Command. 

From 1987 to 1989, after completion of his Air Force enlistment, Adderly worked as an inventory control clerk with 3M Esselte Letraset located in Paramus, New Jersey. 

September 1989 to February 2003, Adderly held position of demand planner with E.I. DuPont DE Nemours Company located in Atlanta, Georgia, where he utilized analytical and evaluative methods such as root cause analysis and performing customer support analysis in addition of exception reporting data resulting with an overall 95 percent line item fill rate.  

Adderly held position of supply chain planner for Eastman Kodak from February 2003 until September 2005. He was responsible for serving as a material planner supporting service organization of assigned product lines of digital film processing equipment for the Eastman Kodak Printing and Publishing business. Provided service providers with manufacturing and delivery forecasts.

From there, Adderly served as inventory manager for Source One Direct from September 2005 to February 2008. Responsible for logistics and inventory control operations. He provided guidance regarding the interpretation of materiel management regulations, policies and procedures for a business specializing in secure and high value financial tools.

Adderly served as the champion core user with Georgia Pacific February 2008 to February 2009. As a member of a Project Management Team, he was tasked to automate all paper mills nationwide to enhance robust asset accountability utilizing proven material management practices via radio frequency/ bar code technology. 

From May 2009 until February 2011, Adderly held the position of operations planner with Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics. He was tasked with developing demand planning functions for the service organization in an effort to improve availability, and become leaner. 

Beginning in 2011, Adderly has held the position of distribution process worker supervisor with DLA Distribution Warner Robins, Georgia, as well as supervisory inventory management specialist at DLA Aviation Jacksonville, Florida.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1587 

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to permit qualifying States 

to use a portion of their allotments under the State children’s health 

insurance program for any fiscal year for certain medicaid expenditures. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2005 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. DOMENICI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. JEFFORDS, 

Mr. ALEXANDER, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. REED, Mr. CHAFEE, 

Mr. LEAHY, Mr. DODD, and Mr. DAYTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to permit 

qualifying States to use a portion of their allotments 

under the State children’s health insurance program for 

any fiscal year for certain medicaid expenditures. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Children’s Health Eq5 uity Technical Amendment Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 1587 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR QUALIFYING STATES TO USE POR2 TION OF SCHIP ALLOTMENT FOR ANY FISCAL 

3 YEAR FOR CERTAIN MEDICAID EXPENDI4 TURES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2105(g)(1)(A) of the So6 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397ee(g)(1)(A)) is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘fiscal year 1998, 1999, 2000, or 2001’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘a fiscal year’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) shall take effect as if enacted on October 

11 1, 2004. 

Æ
#### Mary Lee CALHOUN, Appellant, v. ARTHUR SMITH MUSIC COMPANY, a Florida corporation, and Arthur W. Rohr, Appellees. Rosa Lee EVANS, Appellant, v. ARTHUR SMITH MUSIC COMPANY, a Florida corporation, and Arthur W. Rohr, Appellees.

Nos. 69-13, 69-14.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Dec. 5, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

ORVAL WALTER WATSON, JR.,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 608 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAerodynamic Characteristics of a Supersonic Fighter Aircraft Model at Mach 0.40 to 2.47The aerodynamic characteristics of an advanced twin-engine fighter aircraft designed for supersonic cruise have been studied in the Langley 16-Foot Transonic Tunnel and the Lewis 10- by 10-Foot Supersonic Tunnel. The objective of this investigation was to establish an aerodynamic data base for the configuration with flow-through nacelles and representative inlets. The use of a canard for trim and the effects of fairing over the inlets were assessed. Comparisons between experimental and theoretical results were also made. The theoretical results were determined by using a potential vortex lift code for subsonic speeds and a linear aerodynamic code for supersonic speeds. This investigation was conducted at Mach numbers from 0.40 to 2.47, at angles of attack from 0 deg to about 20 deg, and at inlet capture ratios of about 0.5 to 1.4.Document ID19860014090Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsCapone, F. J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Bare, E. A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Arbiter, D.*(George Washington Univ. Hampton, Va., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1986Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-2580L-16017NAS 1.60:2580Accession Number86N23561Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-43-90-07Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860014090.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Sammie MILLER, a/k/a “Little Sammie”, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-105.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 30, 1970.

*63Philip S. Shailer, Public Defender, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and J. Terrell Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s sole point argued on the appeal is that his arrest for a misdemeanor, having been made without a warrant, was unlawful and thereby justified appellant in the use of violence in resisting such arrest. This point must be decided adversely to appellant because there is in the record substantial competent evidence to support the trial court’s finding that appellant was lawfully arrested on fresh pursuit after committing the misdemeanor of reckless driving in the presence of the arresting officer. Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24. F.S.1967, Section 901.15(1), F.S.A.

Affirmed.

OWEN, J., and ADAMS, ALTO, Associate Judge, concur.

McCAIN, J., dissents, with opinion.

McCAIN, Judge

(dissenting):

Under Calloway Brown v. State, 232 So.2d 55, Fourth District Court of Appeal October 22, 1969, and Adams v. Elliott, 1937, 128 Fla. 79, 174 So. 731, the instant offense being a misdemeanor, I would transfer this appeal to the circuit court for Broward County, Florida.
255 La. 561

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. James E. MAGEE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 50409.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 12, 1970.

In re: James E. Magee applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not support his allegations and is therefore not entitled to the relief sought.
# EUR-Lex - 41993D0014 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 41993D0014

**The Schengen acquis - Decision of the Executive Committee of 14 December 1993 on improving practical judicial cooperation for combating drug trafficking (SCH/Com-ex (93) 14) **

*
Official Journal L 239 , 22/09/2000 P. 0427 - 0427 *

DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

of 14 December 1993

on improving practical judicial cooperation for combating drug trafficking

(SCH/Com-ex (93)14)

THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE,

Having regard to Article 132 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, hereinafter "the Schengen Convention",

Having regard to Articles 48 to 53 and 70 to 76 of the abovementioned Convention,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

So as to improve practical judicial cooperation in combating drug trafficking, the Contracting Parties undertake that should the requested party not intend to enforce a request for mutual assistance, or intend to enforce it only in part, it will inform the requesting party of the reasons for its refusal and, where possible, of the conditions to be met before such a request can be enforced.

This Decision shall enter into force once all the States party to the Schengen Convention have notified that the procedures required by their legal systems for these decisions to be binding on their territory have been completed.

Paris, 14 December 1993.

The Chairman

A. Lamassoure