79–006 

115TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 115–847 

THE ‘‘HEALTH CARE SECURITY ACT OF 2018’’ 

JULY 19, 2018.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 

the Union and ordered to be printed 

Mr. BRADY, from the Committee on Ways and Means, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H.R. 6306] 

The Committee on Ways and Means, to whom was referred the 

bill (H.R. 6306) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the maximum contribution limit to health savings accounts 

to the amount of the deductible and out-of-pocket limitation under 

a high deductible health plan, to permit both spouses to make 

catch-up contributions to the same health savings account, and to 

permit amounts to be paid for qualified medical expenses from a 

health savings account that is established during the 60-day period 

beginning on the date that coverage under a high deductible health 

plan begins, report favorably thereon with an amendment and recommend that the bill as amended do pass. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
2 

115TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 115–847 

HEALTH CARE SECURITY ACT OF 2018 

JULY 19, 2018.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 

the Union and ordered to be printed 

Mr. BRADY of Texas, from the Committee on Ways and Means, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

together with 

DISSENTING VIEWS 

[To accompany H.R. 6306] 

The Committee on Ways and Means, to whom was referred the 

bill (H.R. 6306) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the contribution limitation for health savings accounts, and 

for other purposes, having considered the same, report favorably 

thereon with an amendment and recommend that the bill as 

amended do pass. 

CONTENTS 

Page 

I. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND ................................................................. 4 

II. EXPLANATION OF THE BILL ...................................................................... 5 

A. Maximum Contribution Limit to Health Savings Account Increased to Amount of Deductible and Out-of-Pocket Limitation .... 5 

B. Allow Both Spouses to Make Catch-Up Contributions to the Same 

Health Savings Account ..................................................................... 7 

C. Special Rule for Certain Medical Expenses Incurred Before Establishment of Health Savings Account ................................................ 8 

III. VOTES OF THE COMMITTEE ...................................................................... 9 

IV. BUDGET EFFECTS OF THE BILL ............................................................... 11 

A. Committee Estimate of Budgetary Effects ......................................... 11 

B. Statement Regarding New Budget Authority and Tax Expenditures Budget Authority ...................................................................... 13 

C. Cost Estimate Prepared by the Congressional Budget Office ........... 13 

V. OTHER MATTERS TO BE DISCUSSED UNDER THE RULES OF THE 

HOUSE .......................................................................................................... 13 

A. Committee Oversight Findings and Recommendations .................... 13 

B. Statement of General Performance Goals and Objectives ................ 13 

C. Information Relating to Unfunded Mandates .................................... 13 

D. Applicability of House Rule XXI 5(b) .................................................. 14 

E. Tax Complexity Analysis ..................................................................... 14 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
3 

F. Congressional Earmarks, Limited Tax Benefits, and Limited Tariff 

Benefits ............................................................................................... 14 

G. Duplication of Federal Programs ........................................................ 14 

H. Disclosure of Directed Rule Makings ................................................. 14 

VI. CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED 15 

B. Changes in Existing Law Proposed by the Bill, as Reported ........... 15 

The amendment is as follows: 

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the following: 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care Security Act of 2018’’. 

SEC. 2. MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTION LIMIT TO HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT INCREASED TO 

AMOUNT OF DEDUCTIBLE AND OUT-OF-POCKET LIMITATION. 

(a) SELF-ONLY COVERAGE.—Section 223(b)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

1986 is amended by striking ‘‘$2,250’’ and inserting ‘‘the amount in effect under subsection (c)(2)(A)(ii)(I)’’. 

(b) FAMILY COVERAGE.—Section 223(b)(2)(B) of such Code is amended by striking 

‘‘$4,500’’ and inserting ‘‘the amount in effect under subsection (c)(2)(A)(ii)(II)’’. 

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 223(g)(1) of such Code is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘subsections (b)(2) and’’ both places it appears and inserting 

‘‘subsection’’, and 

(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘determined by’’ and all that follows 

through ‘‘ ‘calendar year 2003’.’’ and inserting ‘‘determined by substituting ‘calendar year 2003’ for ‘calendar year 2016’ in subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof.’’. 

(d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018. 

SEC. 3. ALLOW BOTH SPOUSES TO MAKE CATCH-UP CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SAME HEALTH 

SAVINGS ACCOUNT. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(b)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

amended to read as follows: 

‘‘(5) SPECIAL RULE FOR MARRIED INDIVIDUALS WITH FAMILY COVERAGE.— 

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of individuals who are married to each 

other, if both spouses are eligible individuals and either spouse has family 

coverage under a high deductible health plan as of the first day of any 

month— 

‘‘(i) the limitation under paragraph (1) shall be applied by not taking 

into account any other high deductible health plan coverage of either 

spouse (and if such spouses both have family coverage under separate 

high deductible health plans, only one such coverage shall be taken into 

account), 

‘‘(ii) such limitation (after application of clause (i)) shall be reduced 

by the aggregate amount paid to Archer MSAs of such spouses for the 

taxable year, and 

‘‘(iii) such limitation (after application of clauses (i) and (ii)) shall be 

divided equally between such spouses unless they agree on a different 

division. 

‘‘(B) TREATMENT OF ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTION AMOUNTS.—If both spouses 

referred to in subparagraph (A) have attained age 55 before the close of the 

taxable year, the limitation referred to in subparagraph (A)(iii) which is 

subject to division between the spouses shall include the additional contribution amounts determined under paragraph (3) for both spouses. In any 

other case, any additional contribution amount determined under paragraph (3) shall not be taken into account under subparagraph (A)(iii) and 

shall not be subject to division between the spouses.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by this section shall apply to taxable 

years beginning after December 31, 2018. 

SEC. 4. SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN MEDICAL EXPENSES INCURRED BEFORE ESTABLISHMENT OF HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

‘‘(D) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN MEDICAL EXPENSES INCURRED BEFORE ESTABLISHMENT OF ACCOUNT.—If a health savings account is established during 

the 60-day period beginning on the date that coverage of the account beneficiary under a high deductible health plan begins, then, solely for purposes 

of determining whether an amount paid is used for a qualified medical exVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:49 Jul 20, 2018 Jkt 079006 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6621 E:\HR\OC\HR847.XXX HR847

SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
4 

pense, such account shall be treated as having been established on the date 

that such coverage begins.’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by this section shall apply with respect to coverage beginning after December 31, 2018. 

I. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND 

A. PURPOSE AND SUMMARY

The bill H.R. 6306, as reported by the Committee on Ways and 

Means expands access and enhances the utility of health savings 

accounts (HSAs) through several common-sense improvements to 

the eligibility, contribution and expenditure rules governing HSAs. 

Specifically, this bill would increase the contributions limits for 

HSAs, permit spousal catch-up contributions into the same account 

and create a grace period for medical expenses incurred before the 

establishment of an HSA. 

B. BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR LEGISLATION

According to a survey of 52 health insurers conducted by America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), 21.8 million people were covered by a HDHP with an HSA as of January 2017. These plans and 

accounts are an increasingly popular option for workers and enrollment growth shows no sign of slowing. A survey of employer-sponsored health benefits found that 17 percent of all employers offered 

a HDHP with an HSA in 2017 compared to 2 percent in 2005. 

HSA account holders are diverse. According to WageWorks, Inc., 

the administrator of benefits for more than 7 million people, the 

median household income for an HSA accountholder is $57,060. In 

addition, a JCT analysis found that of the tax returns that took an 

HSA deduction in 2015, 71 percent of the returns reported an income of $200,000 or less, and 28 percent reported an income of 

$75,000 or less. Account holders are also distributed across age 

groups, with nearly a third between the ages of 25–44 and another 

third of account holders between the ages 45–64. 

Most critically, research has consistently found that such coverage, which empowers individuals and families to be more engaged health care consumers, is capable of significantly reducing 

health care costs. 

C. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY

Background 

H.R. 6306 was introduced on July 3, 2018, and was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means. 

Committee action 

The Committee on Ways and Means marked up H.R. 6306, the 

‘‘Health Care Security Act of 2018,’’ on July 12, 2018, and ordered 

the bill, as amended, favorably reported (with a quorum being 

present). 

Committee hearings 

The policy issues associated with Health Savings Accounts 

(HSAs) and need for legislative response were discussed at the folVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:49 Jul 20, 2018 Jkt 079006 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR847.XXX HR847

SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
5 

1For 2018, the basic limit on annual contributions that can be made to an HSA is $3,450 in 

the case of self-only coverage and $6,900 in the case of family coverage. (The 2018 limitation 

for family coverage was revised by the IRS to permit taxpayers to disregard the $6,850 limitation under the modified inflation adjustment of Pub. L. No. 115–97. Rev. Rul. 2018–27, 2018– 

20 I.R.B. 591, May 14, 2018.) The basic annual contributions limits are increased by $1,000 for 

individuals who have attained age 55 by the end of the taxable year (referred to as ‘‘catch-up’’ 

contributions). 

lowing Ways and Means hearings during the 114th and 115th Congress: 

• Full Committee Hearing on the Tax Treatment of Health 

Care (April 14, 2016) 

• Subcommittee on Health Member Day Hearing on Tax-Related Proposals to Improve Health Care (May 17, 2016) 

• Subcommittee on Health Hearing on Rising Health Insurance Premiums Under the Affordable Care Act (July 12, 2016) 

• Subcommittee on Health Hearing on Lowering Costs and 

Expanding Access to Health Care through Consumer-Directed 

Health Plans (June 6, 2018) 

II. EXPLANATION OF THE BILL 

A. MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTION LIMIT TO HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT

INCREASED TO AMOUNT OF DEDUCTIBLE AND OUT-OF-POCKET LIMITATION

PRESENT LAW

Health savings accounts 

An individual may establish a health savings account (‘‘HSA’’) 

only if the individual is covered under a plan that meets the requirements for a high deductible health plan, as described below. 

In general, HSAs provide tax-favored treatment for current medical 

expenses as well as the ability to save on a tax-favored basis for 

future medical expenses. In general, an HSA is a tax-exempt trust 

or custodial account created exclusively to pay for the qualified 

medical expenses of the account holder and his or her spouse and 

dependents. 

Within limits,1 contributions to an HSA made by or on behalf of 

an eligible individual are deductible by the individual. Contributions to an HSA are excludible from income and employment taxes 

if made by the employer. Earnings in HSAs are not taxable. Distributions from an HSA for qualified medical expenses are not includible in gross income. Distributions from an HSA that are not 

used for qualified medical expenses are includible in gross income 

and are subject to an additional tax of 20 percent. The 20-percent 

additional tax does not apply if the distribution is made after death 

or disability, or after the individual attains the age of Medicare eligibility (age 65). 

High deductible health plans. 

A high deductible health plan is a health plan that has a minimum annual deductible of $1,350 (for 2018) for self-only coverage 

and twice this amount for family coverage, and for which the sum 

of the annual deductible and other annual out-of-pocket expenses 

(other than premiums) for covered benefits does not exceed $6,650 

(for 2018) for self-only coverage and twice this amount for family 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
6 

2Sec. 223(c)(2). 

3Sec. 223(g). 

4Sec. 223(c)(1). 

5Sec. 223(c)(1)(B). 

6Sec. 223(c)(3). 

coverage.2 These dollar thresholds are subject to inflation adjustment, based on chained CPI.3

An individual who is covered under a high deductible health plan 

is eligible to establish an HSA, provided that while such individual 

is covered under the high deductible health plan, the individual is 

not covered under any health plan that (1) is not a high deductible 

health plan and (2) provides coverage for any benefit (subject to 

certain exceptions) covered under the high deductible health plan.4

Various types of coverage are disregarded for this purpose, including coverage of any benefit provided by permitted insurance, 

coverage (whether through insurance or otherwise) for accidents, 

disability, dental care, vision care, or long-term care, as well as certain limited coverage through health flexible savings accounts.5

Permitted insurance means insurance under which substantially 

all of the coverage provided relates to liabilities incurred under 

workers’ compensation laws, tort liabilities, liabilities relating to 

ownership or use of property, or such other similar liabilities as 

specified by the Secretary under regulations. Permitted insurance 

also means insurance for a specified disease or illness, and insurance paying a fixed amount per day (or other period) of hospitalization.6

REASONS FOR CHANGE

The Committee believes connecting consumers to their health 

care dollars through consumer-directed health plans, including 

high deductible health plans, reduces health care costs. The Committee further believes that HSAs are an important tool used in 

conjunction with high deductible health plans to permit consumers 

to set aside funds and provide such consumers the choice on how 

to spend those funds to pay for medical care. 

The Committee believes that raising the basic limit on aggregate 

HSA contributions for a year to equal the maximum of the sums 

of the annual deductible and out-of-pocket expenses permitted 

under a high deductible health plan will expand access and enhance the utility of HSAs. 

EXPLANATION OF PROVISION

Under the provision, the basic limit on aggregate HSA contributions for a year is increased to equal the maximum of the sum of 

the annual deductible and out-of-pocket expenses permitted under 

a high deductible health plan. Thus, for 2018, the basic limit is 

$6,650 in the case of self-only coverage and $13,300 in the case of 

family coverage. As under present law, basic contribution limits are 

increased by $1,000 for an eligible individual who has attained age 

55 by the end of the taxable year. In addition, as under present 

law, the annual HSA contribution limit for an individual is generally the sum of the limits determined separately for each month 

(that is, 1/12 of the limit for the year, including the catch-up limit, 

if applicable), based on the individual’s status and health plan coverage as of the first day of the month. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
7 

7 Notice 2004–50, 2004–2 C.B. 196, Q&A–63. 

8 Notice 2004–50, Q&A–32. Funds from that HSA can be used to pay qualified medical expenses for either spouse on a tax-free basis. Notice 2004–50, Q&A–36. 9 Notice 2008–59, 2008–2 C.B. 123, Q&A–22. 

EFFECTIVE DATE

The provision is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018. 

B. ALLOW BOTH SPOUSES TO MAKE CATCH-UP CONTRIBUTIONS TO

THE SAME HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT

PRESENT LAW

An individual with a high deductible health plan and no other 

health plan (other than a plan that provides certain permitted insurance or permitted coverage) may establish an HSA. HSA contributions for a year are subject to basic dollar limits that are adjusted annually as needed to reflect annual cost-of-living increases. 

The basic contribution limits are increased by $1,000 for an eligible 

individual who has attained age 55 by the end of the taxable year 

(referred to as ‘‘catch-up contributions’’). If eligible individuals are 

married to each other and either spouse has family coverage, both 

spouses are treated as having only family coverage, so that the contribution limit for family coverage applies. The contribution limit 

(without regard to any catch-up contribution amounts) is divided 

equally between the spouses unless they agree on a different division. 

If both spouses of a married couple are eligible individuals, each 

may contribute to an HSA, but they cannot have a joint HSA.7

Under the rule described above, however, the spouses may divide 

their basic contribution limit for the year by allocating the entire 

amount to one spouse to be contributed to that spouse’s HSA.8

This allocation rule does not apply to catch-up contribution 

amounts, however. Thus, if both spouses are at least age 55 and 

eligible to make catch-up contributions, each must make the catchup contribution to his or her own HSA.9

REASONS FOR CHANGE

The Committee believes connecting consumers to their health 

care dollars through consumer-directed health plans, including 

high deductible health plans, reduces health care costs. The Committee further believes that HSAs are an important tool used in 

conjunction with high deductible health plans to permit consumers 

to set aside funds and provide such consumers the choice on how 

to spend those funds to pay for medical care. 

The Committee believes that allowing both spouses to make 

catch-up contributions to the same health savings account will enhance a couple’s ability to save and plan for future health care expenses. 

EXPLANATION OF PROVISION

Under the provision, if both spouses of a married couple are eligible for catch-up contributions and either has family coverage under 

a high deductible health plan as of the first day of any month, the 

annual contribution limit that can be allocated between them inVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:49 Jul 20, 2018 Jkt 079006 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR847.XXX HR847

SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
8 

10 1Different allocation rules may apply in certain other cases. 11Q&A–26 of Notice 2004–2, 2004–1 C.B. 269. 

cludes catch-up contribution amounts of both spouses. Thus, for example, the spouses can agree that their combined basic and catchup contribution amounts are allocated to one spouse to be contributed to that spouse’s HSA.10

EFFECTIVE DATE

The provision is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018. 

C. SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN MEDICAL EXPENSES INCURRED

BEFORE ESTABLISHMENT OF HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT

PRESENT LAW

Distributions from an HSA for qualified medical expenses are not 

includible in gross income. Distributions from an HSA that are not 

used for qualified medical expenses are includible in gross income 

and are subject to an additional tax of 20 percent. The 20-percent 

additional tax does not apply if the distribution is made after 

death, disability, or after the individual attains the age of Medicare 

eligibility (that is, age 65). 

In order for a distribution from an HSA to be excludible as a payment for a qualified medical expense, the medical expense must be 

incurred on or after the date that the HSA is established.11 Thus, 

a distribution from an HSA is not excludible as a payment for a 

qualified medical expense if the medical expense is incurred after 

a taxpayer enrolls in a high deductible health plan but before the 

taxpayer establishes an HSA. 

REASONS FOR CHANGE

The Committee believes connecting consumers to their health 

care dollars through consumer-directed health plans, including 

high deductible health plans, reduces health care costs. The Committee further believes that HSAs are an important tool used in 

conjunction with high deductible health plans to permit consumers 

to set aside funds and provide such consumers the choice on how 

to spend those funds to pay for medical care. 

The Committee believes that allowing an HSA to be treated as 

established on the date coverage under a high deductible health 

plan begins will expand access to and enhance the utility of HSAs. 

EXPLANATION OF PROVISION

Under the provision, if an HSA is established during the 60-day 

period beginning on the date that an individual’s coverage under 

a high deductible health plan begins, then, solely for purposes of 

determining whether an amount paid is used for a qualified medical expense, the HSA is treated as having been established on the 

date coverage under the high deductible health plan begins. Thus, 

if a taxpayer establishes an HSA within 60 days of the date that 

the taxpayer’s coverage under a high deductible health plan begins, 

any distribution from an HSA used as a payment for a qualified 

medical expense incurred during that 60-day period after the high 

deductible health plan coverage began is excludible from gross inVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:49 Jul 20, 2018 Jkt 079006 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR847.XXX HR847

SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
9 

come as a payment for a qualified medical expense even though the 

expense was incurred before the date that the HSA was established. 

EFFECTIVE DATE

The provision is effective with respect to coverage beginning after 

December 31, 2018. 

III. VOTES OF THE COMMITTEE 

In compliance with clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the House of Representatives, the following statement is made concerning the vote 

of the Committee on Ways and Means during the markup consideration of H.R. 6306, the ‘‘Health Care Security Act of 2018,’’ on July 

12, 2018. 

The vote on the amendment offered by Mr. Doggett to the 

amendment in the nature of a substitute offered by Chairman 

Brady to H.R. 6306, which would require that plans covered under 

the underlying bill do not discriminate or increase premiums on 

the basis of pre-existing conditions, was not agreed to by a roll call 

vote of 15 yeas to 23 nays. The vote was as follows: 

Representative Yea Nay Present Representative Yea Nay Present 

Mr. Brady .............................. ........... X ............. Mr. Neal ............................... X ........... .............

Mr. Johnson ........................... ........... X ............. Mr. Levin .............................. X ........... .............

Mr. Nunes ............................. ........... X ............. Mr. Lewis .............................. X ........... .............

Mr. Reichert .......................... ........... X ............. Mr. Doggett .......................... X ........... .............

Mr. Roskam ........................... ........... X ............. Mr. Thompson ...................... X ........... .............

Mr. Buchanan ....................... ........... X ............. Mr. Larson ............................ X ........... .............

Mr. Smith (NE) ...................... ........... X ............. Mr. Blumenauer ................... X ........... .............

Ms. Jenkins ........................... ........... X ............. Mr. Kind ............................... X ........... .............

Mr. Paulsen ........................... ........... X ............. Mr. Pascrell .......................... X ........... .............

Mr. Marchant ........................ ........... X ............. Mr. Crowley .......................... X ........... .............

Ms. Black .............................. ........... ........... ............. Mr. Davis .............................. X ........... .............

Mr. Reed ............................... ........... X ............. Ms. Sanchez ......................... X ........... .............

Mr. Kelly ................................ ........... X ............. Mr. Higgins .......................... X ........... .............

Mr. Renacci ........................... ........... X ............. Ms. Sewell ............................ ........... ........... .............

Ms. Noem .............................. ........... X ............. Ms. DelBene ......................... X ........... .............

Mr. Holding ........................... ........... X ............. Ms. Chu ................................ X ........... .............

Mr. Smith (MO) ..................... ........... X .............

Mr. Rice ................................ ........... X .............

Mr. Schweikert ...................... ........... X .............

Ms. Walorski ......................... ........... X .............

Mr. Curbelo ........................... ........... X .............

Mr. Bishop ............................ ........... X .............

Mr. LaHood ............................ ........... X .............

Mr. Wenstrup ........................ ........... X .............

In compliance with clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the House of Representatives, the following statement is made concerning the vote 

of the Committee on Ways and Means during the markup consideration of H.R. 6306, ‘‘To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

to improve the rules with respect of health savings accounts,’’ on 

July 12, 2018. 

The vote on the amendment offered by Ms. Chu to the amendment in the nature of a substitute offered by Chairman Brady to 

H.R. 6306, which would allow individuals with Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) to temporarily designate immigrant children in detention settings or unaccompanied children in the custody of the 

Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) as dependents for purposes 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
10 

of using HSA funds for their medical care, was not agreed to by 

a roll call vote of 16 yeas to 22 nays. The vote was as follows: 

Representative Yea Nay Present Representative Yea Nay Present 

Mr. Brady .............................. ........... X ............. Mr. Neal ............................... X ........... .............

Mr. Johnson ........................... ........... X ............. Mr. Levin .............................. X ........... .............

Mr. Nunes ............................. ........... X ............. Mr. Lewis .............................. X ........... .............

Mr. Reichert .......................... ........... X ............. Mr. Doggett .......................... X ........... .............

Mr. Roskam ........................... ........... X ............. Mr. Thompson ...................... X ........... .............

Mr. Buchanan ....................... ........... X ............. Mr. Larson ............................ X ........... .............

Mr. Smith (NE) ...................... ........... X ............. Mr. Blumenauer ................... X ........... .............

Ms. Jenkins ........................... ........... X ............. Mr. Kind ............................... X ........... .............

Mr. Paulsen ........................... ........... X ............. Mr. Pascrell .......................... X ........... .............

Mr. Marchant ........................ ........... X ............. Mr. Crowley .......................... X ........... .............

Ms. Black .............................. ........... ........... ............. Mr. Davis .............................. X ........... .............

Mr. Reed ............................... ........... X ............. Ms. Sanchez ......................... X ........... .............

Mr. Kelly ................................ ........... X ............. Mr. Higgins .......................... X ........... .............

Mr. Renacci ........................... ........... X ............. Ms. Sewell ............................ X ........... .............

Ms. Noem .............................. ........... X ............. Ms. DelBene ......................... X ........... .............

Mr. Holding ........................... ........... X ............. Ms. Chu ................................ X ........... .............

Mr. Smith (MO) ..................... ........... X .............

Mr. Rice ................................ ........... X .............

Mr. Schweikert ...................... ........... X .............

Ms. Walorski ......................... ........... X .............

Mr. Curbelo ........................... ........... X .............

Mr. Bishop ............................ ........... X .............

Mr. LaHood ............................ ........... X .............

Mr. Wenstrup ........................ ........... X .............

In compliance with clause 3(b) of rule XIII of the House of Representatives, the following statement is made concerning the vote 

of the Committee on Ways and Means during the markup consideration of H.R. 6306, ‘‘To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

to improve the rules with respect to health savings accounts’’ on 

July 12, 2018. 

H.R. 6306 was ordered favorably reported to the House of Representatives as amended by an amendment in the nature of a substitute offered by Chairman Brady by a roll call vote of 22 yeas to 

16 nays. The vote was as follows: 

Representative Yea Nay Present Representative Yea Nay Present 

Mr. Brady .............................. X ........... ............. Mr. Neal ............................... ........... X .............

Mr. Johnson ........................... X ........... ............. Mr. Levin .............................. ........... X .............

Mr. Nunes ............................. ........... ........... ............. Mr. Lewis .............................. ........... X .............

Mr. Reichert .......................... X ........... ............. Mr. Doggett .......................... ........... X .............

Mr. Roskam ........................... X ........... ............. Mr. Thompson ...................... ........... X .............

Mr. Buchanan ....................... X ........... ............. Mr. Larson ............................ ........... X .............

Mr. Smith (NE) ...................... X ........... ............. Mr. Blumenauer ................... ........... X .............

Ms. Jenkins ........................... X ........... ............. Mr. Kind ............................... ........... X .............

Mr. Paulsen ........................... X ........... ............. Mr. Pascrell .......................... ........... X .............

Mr. Marchant ........................ X ........... ............. Mr. Crowley .......................... ........... X .............

Ms. Black .............................. ........... ........... ............. Mr. Davis .............................. ........... X .............

Mr. Reed ............................... X ........... ............. Ms. Sanchez ......................... ........... X .............

Mr. Kelly ................................ X ........... ............. Mr. Higgins .......................... ........... X .............

Mr. Renacci ........................... X ........... ............. Ms. Sewell ............................ ........... X .............

Ms. Noem .............................. X ........... ............. Ms. DelBene ......................... ........... X .............

Mr. Holding ........................... X ........... ............. Ms. Chu ................................ ........... X .............

Mr. Smith (MO) ..................... X ........... .............

Mr. Rice ................................ X ........... .............

Mr. Schweikert ...................... X ........... .............

Ms. Walorski ......................... X ........... .............

Mr. Curbelo ........................... X ........... .............

Mr. Bishop ............................ X ........... .............

Mr. LaHood ............................ X ........... .............


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
11 

Representative Yea Nay Present Representative Yea Nay Present 

Mr. Wenstrup ........................ X ........... .............

IV. BUDGET EFFECTS OF THE BILL 

A. COMMITTEE ESTIMATE OF BUDGETARY EFFECTS

In compliance with clause 3(d) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 

House of Representatives, the following statement is made concerning the effects on the budget of the bill, H.R. 6306, as reported. 

The bill, as reported, is estimated to have the following effect on 

Federal fiscal year budget receipts for the period 2019–2028: 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
12 

Fiscal Years 

[Millions of Dollars] 

Item 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2019–23 2019–28 

Maximum Contribution Limit to Health Savings Account Increased to 

Amount of Deductible and Out-of-Pocket Limitation 1 ............................ ¥626 ¥957 ¥1,079 ¥1,211 ¥1,351 ¥1,485 ¥1,624 ¥1,885 ¥2,078 ¥2,231 ¥5,223 ¥14,527 

Allow Both Spouses to Make Catch-Up Contributions to the Same Health 

Savings Account 1 .................................................................................... ¥22 ¥44 ¥46 ¥47 ¥48 ¥50 ¥51 ¥56 ¥60 ¥62 ¥207 ¥486 

Special Rule for Certain Medical Expenses Incurred Before Establishment 

of Health Savings Account 1 .................................................................... ¥5 ¥14 ¥19 ¥21 ¥23 ¥25 ¥28 ¥31 ¥35 ¥39 ¥82 ¥241 

Total ..................................................................................................... ¥652 ¥1,016 ¥1,144 ¥1,279 ¥1,422 ¥1,561 ¥1,703 ¥1,972 ¥2,173 ¥2,332 ¥5,512 ¥15,254 

NOTE: Details may not add to totals due to rounding. 1 Estimate includes the following off-budget effects: 

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2019–23 2019–28 

Maximum Contribution Limit to Health Savings Account Increased to 

Amount of Deductible and Out-of-Pocket Limitation .............................. ¥149 ¥224 ¥253 ¥285 ¥318 ¥352 ¥385 ¥417 ¥451 ¥486 ¥1,230 ¥3,320 

Allow Both Spouses to Make Catch-Up Contributions to the Same Health 

Savings Account ...................................................................................... ¥7 ¥14 ¥14 ¥15 ¥15 ¥16 ¥16 ¥18 ¥17 ¥17 ¥65 ¥149 

Special Rule for Certain Medical Expenses Incurred Before Establishment 

of Health Savings Account ...................................................................... ¥1 ¥5 ¥8 ¥9 ¥10 ¥11 ¥12 ¥13 ¥14 ¥16 ¥34 ¥101 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
13 

Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of 

Representatives, the following statement is made by the Joint Committee on Taxation with respect to the provisions of the bill amending the Internal Revenue Code of 1986: The gross budgetary effect 

(before incorporating macroeconomic effects) in any fiscal year is 

less than 0.25 percent of the current projected gross domestic product of the United States for that fiscal year; therefore, the bill is 

not ‘‘major legislation’’ for purposes of requiring that the estimate 

include the budgetary effects of changes in economic output, employment, capital stock and other macroeconomic variables. 

B. STATEMENT REGARDING NEW BUDGET AUTHORITY AND TAX

EXPENDITURES BUDGET AUTHORITY

In compliance with clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 

House of Representatives, the Committee states that the bill involves no new or increased budget authority. The Committee further states that the revenue-reducing tax provision involves no new 

tax expenditure. 

C. COST ESTIMATE PREPARED BY THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET

OFFICE

In compliance with clause 3(d) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 

House of Representatives, the following statement is made concerning the effects on the budget of the bill, H.R. 6138, as reported. 

As of the filing of this report, the Committee had not received an 

estimate prepared by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). 

V. OTHER MATTERS TO BE DISCUSSED UNDER THE 

RULES OF THE HOUSE 

A. COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Pursuant to clause 3(c)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House 

of Representatives, the Committee advises that the findings and 

recommendations of the Committee, based on oversight activities 

under clause 2(b)(1) of rule X of the Rules of the House of Representatives, are incorporated into the description portions of this 

report. 

B. STATEMENT OF GENERAL PERFORMANCE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

With respect to clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 

House of Representatives, the Committee advises that the bill contains no measure that authorizes funding, so no statement of general performance goals and objectives for which any measure authorizes funding is required. 

C. INFORMATION RELATING TO UNFUNDED MANDATES

This information is provided in accordance with section 423 of 

the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. No. 104–4). 

The Committee has determined that the bill does not contain 

Federal mandates on the private sector. The Committee has determined that the bill does not impose a Federal intergovernmental 

mandate on State, local, or tribal governments. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
14 

D. APPLICABILITY OF HOUSE RULE XXI 5(b) 

Rule XXI 5(b) of the Rules of the House of Representatives provides, in part, that ‘‘A bill or joint resolution, amendment, or conference report carrying a Federal income tax rate increase may not 

be considered as passed or agreed to unless so determined by a 

vote of not less than three-fifths of the Members voting, a quorum 

being present.’’ The Committee has carefully reviewed the bill and 

states that the bill does not involve any Federal income tax rate 

increases within the meaning of the rule. 

E. TAX COMPLEXITY ANALYSIS

Section 4022(b) of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring 

and Reform Act of 1998 (‘‘IRS Reform Act’’) requires the staff of the 

Joint Committee on Taxation (in consultation with the Internal 

Revenue Service and the Treasury Department) to provide a tax 

complexity analysis. The complexity analysis is required for all legislation reported by the Senate Committee on Finance, the House 

Committee on Ways and Means, or any committee of conference if 

the legislation includes a provision that directly or indirectly 

amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and has widespread applicability to individuals or small businesses. 

Pursuant to clause 3(h)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House 

of Representatives, the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation 

has determined that a complexity analysis is not required under 

section 4022(b) of the IRS Reform Act because the bill contains no 

provisions that amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and that 

have ‘‘widespread applicability’’ to individuals or small businesses, 

within the meaning of the rule. 

F. CONGRESSIONAL EARMARKS, LIMITED TAX BENEFITS, AND

LIMITED TARIFF BENEFITS

With respect to clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House 

of Representatives, the Committee has carefully reviewed the provisions of the bill and states that the provisions of the bill do not 

contain any congressional earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited 

tariff benefits within the meaning of the rule. 

G. DUPLICATION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS

In compliance with Sec. 3(c)(5) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 

House of Representatives, the Committee states that no provision 

of the bill establishes or reauthorizes: (1) a program of the Federal 

Government known to be duplicative of another Federal program, 

(2) a program included in any report from the Government Accountability Office to Congress pursuant to section 21 of Public 

Law 111–139, or (3) a program related to a program identified in 

the most recent Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, published 

pursuant to section 6104 of title 31, United States Code. 

H. DISCLOSURE OF DIRECTED RULE MAKINGS

In compliance with Sec. 3(i) of H. Res. 5 (115th Congress), the 

following statement is made concerning directed rule makings: The 

Committee advises that the bill requires no directed rule makings 

within the meaning of such section. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
15 

VI. CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS 

REPORTED 

B. CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW PROPOSED BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED

In compliance with clause 3(e)(1)(B) of rule XIII of the Rules of 

the House of Representatives, changes in existing law proposed by 

the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed 

to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new matter is printed 

in italic, existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in 

roman): 

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED

In compliance with clause 3(e) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 

House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by the bill, 

as reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new matter is printed in italic, 

and existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in 

roman): 

INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 

* * * * * * * 

Subtitle A—Income Taxes 

* * * * * * * 

CHAPTER 1—NORMAL TAXES AND SURTAXES 

* * * * * * * 

Subchapter B—Computation of Taxable Income 

* * * * * * * 

PART VII—ADDITIONAL ITEMIZED DEDUCTIONS FOR 

INDIVIDUALS 

* * * * * * * 

SEC. 223. HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS. 

(a) DEDUCTION ALLOWED.—In the case of an individual who is an 

eligible individual for any month during the taxable year, there 

shall be allowed as a deduction for the taxable year an amount 

equal to the aggregate amount paid in cash during such taxable 

year by or on behalf of such individual to a health savings account 

of such individual. 

(b) LIMITATIONS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The amount allowable as a deduction 

under subsection (a) to an individual for the taxable year shall 

not exceed the sum of the monthly limitations for months during such taxable year that the individual is an eligible individual. 

(2) MONTHLY LIMITATION.—The monthly limitation for any 

month is 1⁄12 of— 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
16 

(A) in the case of an eligible individual who has selfonly coverage under a high deductible health plan as of 

the first day of such month, ø$2,250¿ the amount in effect 

under subsection (c)(2)(A)(ii)(I). (B) in the case of an eligible individual who has family 

coverage under a high deductible health plan as of the first 

day of such month, ø$4,500¿ the amount in effect under 

subsection (c)(2)(A)(ii)(II). (3) ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS 55 OR

OLDER.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an individual who has 

attained age 55 before the close of the taxable year, the applicable limitation under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 

paragraph (2) shall be increased by the additional contribution amount. 

(B) ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT.—For purposes 

of this section, the additional contribution amount is the 

amount determined in accordance with the following table: 

For taxable years beginning in: The additional contribution amount is: 

2004 $500

2005 $600

2006 $700

2007 $800

2008 $900

2009 and thereafter $1,000. 

(4) COORDINATION WITH OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS.—The limitation which would (but for this paragraph) apply under this 

subsection to an individual for any taxable year shall be reduced (but not below zero) by the sum of— 

(A) the aggregate amount paid for such taxable year to 

Archer MSAs of such individual, 

(B) the aggregate amount contributed to health savings 

accounts of such individual which is excludable from the 

taxpayer’s gross income for such taxable year under section 106(d) (and such amount shall not be allowed as a deduction under subsection (a)), and 

(C) the aggregate amount contributed to health savings 

accounts of such individual for such taxable year under 

section 408(d)(9) (and such amount shall not be allowed as 

a deduction under subsection (a)). 

Subparagraph (A) shall not apply with respect to any individual to whom paragraph (5) applies. 

ø(5) SPECIAL RULE FOR MARRIED INDIVIDUALS.—In the case of 

individuals who are married to each other, if either spouse has 

family coverage— 

ø(A) both spouses shall be treated as having only such 

family coverage (and if such spouses each have family coverage under different plans, as having the family coverage 

with the lowest annual deductible), and 

ø(B) the limitation under paragraph (1) (after the application of subparagraph (A) and without regard to any additional contribution amount under paragraph (3))— 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
17 

ø(i) shall be reduced by the aggregate amount paid 

to Archer MSAs of such spouses for the taxable year, 

and 

ø(ii) after such reduction, shall be divided equally 

between them unless they agree on a different division.¿ 

(5) SPECIAL RULE FOR MARRIED INDIVIDUALS WITH FAMILY

COVERAGE.— (A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of individuals who are 

married to each other, if both spouses are eligible individuals and either spouse has family coverage under a high 

deductible health plan as of the first day of any month— 

(i) the limitation under paragraph (1) shall be applied by not taking into account any other high deductible health plan coverage of either spouse (and if such 

spouses both have family coverage under separate high 

deductible health plans, only one such coverage shall 

be taken into account), 

(ii) such limitation (after application of clause (i)) 

shall be reduced by the aggregate amount paid to Archer MSAs of such spouses for the taxable year, and 

(iii) such limitation (after application of clauses (i) 

and (ii)) shall be divided equally between such spouses 

unless they agree on a different division. 

(B) TREATMENT OF ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTION

AMOUNTS.—If both spouses referred to in subparagraph (A) 

have attained age 55 before the close of the taxable year, the 

limitation referred to in subparagraph (A)(iii) which is subject to division between the spouses shall include the additional contribution amounts determined under paragraph 

(3) for both spouses. In any other case, any additional contribution amount determined under paragraph (3) shall not 

be taken into account under subparagraph (A)(iii) and 

shall not be subject to division between the spouses. 

(6) DENIAL OF DEDUCTION TO DEPENDENTS.—No deduction 

shall be allowed under this section to any individual with respect to whom a deduction under section 151 is allowable to 

another taxpayer for a taxable year beginning in the calendar 

year in which such individual’s taxable year begins. 

(7) MEDICARE ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUALS.—The limitation under 

this subsection for any month with respect to an individual 

shall be zero for the first month such individual is entitled to 

benefits under title XVIII of the Social Security Act and for 

each month thereafter. 

(8) INCREASE IN LIMIT FOR INDIVIDUALS BECOMING ELIGIBLE

INDIVIDUALS AFTER THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of computing the limitation under paragraph (1) for any taxable year, an individual who is an eligible individual during the last month 

of such taxable year shall be treated— 

(i) as having been an eligible individual during each 

of the months in such taxable year, and 

(ii) as having been enrolled, during each of the 

months such individual is treated as an eligible individual solely by reason of clause (i), in the same high 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
18 

deductible health plan in which the individual was enrolled for the last month of such taxable year. 

(B) FAILURE TO MAINTAIN HIGH DEDUCTIBLE HEALTH

PLAN COVERAGE.— (i) IN GENERAL.—If, at any time during the testing 

period, the individual is not an eligible individual, 

then— 

(I) gross income of the individual for the taxable 

year in which occurs the first month in the testing 

period for which such individual is not an eligible 

individual is increased by the aggregate amount of 

all contributions to the health savings account of 

the individual which could not have been made 

but for subparagraph (A), and 

(II) the tax imposed by this chapter for any taxable year on the individual shall be increased by 

10 percent of the amount of such increase. 

(ii) EXCEPTION FOR DISABILITY OR DEATH.—Subclauses (I) and (II) of clause (i) shall not apply if the 

individual ceased to be an eligible individual by reason 

of the death of the individual or the individual becoming disabled (within the meaning of section 72(m)(7)). 

(iii) TESTING PERIOD.—The term ‘‘testing period’’ 

means the period beginning with the last month of the 

taxable year referred to in subparagraph (A) and ending on the last day of the 12th month following such 

month. 

(c) DEFINITIONS AND SPECIAL RULES.—For purposes of this section— 

(1) ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL.— (A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘eligible individual’’ means, 

with respect to any month, any individual if— 

(i) such individual is covered under a high deductible health plan as of the 1st day of such month, and 

(ii) such individual is not, while covered under a 

high deductible health plan, covered under any health 

plan— 

(I) which is not a high deductible health plan, 

and 

(II) which provides coverage for any benefit 

which is covered under the high deductible health 

plan. 

(B) CERTAIN COVERAGE DISREGARDED.—Subparagraph 

(A)(ii) shall be applied without regard to— 

(i) coverage for any benefit provided by permitted insurance, 

(ii) coverage (whether through insurance or otherwise) for accidents, disability, dental care, vision care, 

or long-term care, and 

(iii) for taxable years beginning after December 31, 

2006, coverage under a health flexible spending arrangement during any period immediately following 

the end of a plan year of such arrangement during 

which unused benefits or contributions remaining at 

the end of such plan year may be paid or reimbursed 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
19 

to plan participants for qualified benefit expenses incurred during such period if— 

(I) the balance in such arrangement at the end 

of such plan year is zero, or 

(II) the individual is making a qualified HSA 

distribution (as defined in section 106(e)) in an 

amount equal to the remaining balance in such 

arrangement as of the end of such plan year, in 

accordance with rules prescribed by the Secretary. 

(C) SPECIAL RULE FOR INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR CER- TAIN VETERANS BENEFITS.—An individual shall not fail to 

be treated as an eligible individual for any period merely 

because the individual receives hospital care or medical 

services under any law administered by the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs for a service-connected disability (within 

the meaning of section 101(16) of title 38, United States 

Code). 

(2) HIGH DEDUCTIBLE HEALTH PLAN.— (A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘high deductible health 

plan’’ means a health plan— 

(i) which has an annual deductible which is not less 

than— 

(I) $1,000 for self-only coverage, and 

(II) twice the dollar amount in subclause (I) for 

family coverage, and 

(ii) the sum of the annual deductible and the other 

annual out-of-pocket expenses required to be paid 

under the plan (other than for premiums) for covered 

benefits does not exceed— 

(I) $5,000 for self-only coverage, and 

(II) twice the dollar amount in subclause (I) for 

family coverage. 

(B) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN PLANS.—Such term does not 

include a health plan if substantially all of its coverage is 

coverage described in paragraph (1)(B). 

(C) SAFE HARBOR FOR ABSENCE OF PREVENTIVE CARE DE- DUCTIBLE.—A plan shall not fail to be treated as a high deductible health plan by reason of failing to have a deductible for preventive care (within the meaning of section 

1861 of the Social Security Act, except as otherwise provided by the Secretary). 

(D) SPECIAL RULES FOR NETWORK PLANS.—In the case of 

a plan using a network of providers— 

(i) ANNUAL OUT-OF-POCKET LIMITATION.—Such plan 

shall not fail to be treated as a high deductible health 

plan by reason of having an out-of-pocket limitation 

for services provided outside of such network which 

exceeds the applicable limitation under subparagraph 

(A)(ii). 

(ii) ANNUAL DEDUCTIBLE.—Such plan’s annual deductible for services provided outside of such network 

shall not be taken into account for purposes of subsection (b)(2). 

(3) PERMITTED INSURANCE.—The term ‘‘permitted insurance’’ 

means— 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
20 

(A) insurance if substantially all of the coverage provided under such insurance relates to— 

(i) liabilities incurred under workers’ compensation 

laws, 

(ii) tort liabilities, 

(iii) liabilities relating to ownership or use of property, or 

(iv) such other similar liabilities as the Secretary 

may specify by regulations, 

(B) insurance for a specified disease or illness, and 

(C) insurance paying a fixed amount per day (or other 

period) of hospitalization. 

(4) FAMILY COVERAGE.—The term ‘‘family coverage’’ means 

any coverage other than self-only coverage. 

(5) ARCHER MSA.—The term ‘‘Archer MSA’’ has the meaning 

given such term in section 220(d). 

(d) HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT.—For purposes of this section— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘health savings account’’ means 

a trust created or organized in the United States as a health 

savings account exclusively for the purpose of paying the qualified medical expenses of the account beneficiary, but only if the 

written governing instrument creating the trust meets the following requirements: 

(A) Except in the case of a rollover contribution described in subsection (f)(5) or section 220(f)(5), no contribution will be accepted— 

(i) unless it is in cash, or 

(ii) to the extent such contribution, when added to 

previous contributions to the trust for the calendar 

year, exceeds the sum of— 

(I) the dollar amount in effect under subsection 

(b)(2)(B), and 

(II) the dollar amount in effect under subsection 

(b)(3)(B). 

(B) The trustee is a bank (as defined in section 408(n)), 

an insurance company (as defined in section 816), or another person who demonstrates to the satisfaction of the 

Secretary that the manner in which such person will administer the trust will be consistent with the requirements 

of this section. 

(C) No part of the trust assets will be invested in life insurance contracts. 

(D) The assets of the trust will not be commingled with 

other property except in a common trust fund or common 

investment fund. 

(E) The interest of an individual in the balance in his account is nonforfeitable. 

(2) QUALIFIED MEDICAL EXPENSES.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘‘qualified medical expenses’’ 

means, with respect to an account beneficiary, amounts 

paid by such beneficiary for medical care (as defined in 

section 213(d)) for such individual, the spouse of such individual, and any dependent (as defined in section 152, determined without regard to subsections (b)(1), (b)(2), and 

(d)(1)(B) thereof) of such individual, but only to the extent 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
21 

such amounts are not compensated for by insurance or 

otherwise. Such term shall include an amount paid for 

medicine or a drug only if such medicine or drug is a prescribed drug (determined without regard to whether such 

drug is available without a prescription) or is insulin. 

(B) HEALTH INSURANCE MAY NOT BE PURCHASED FROM

ACCOUNT.—Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to any payment for insurance. 

(C) EXCEPTIONS.—Subparagraph (B) shall not apply to 

any expense for coverage under— 

(i) a health plan during any period of continuation 

coverage required under any Federal law, 

(ii) a qualified long-term care insurance contract (as 

defined in section 7702B(b)), 

(iii) a health plan during a period in which the individual is receiving unemployment compensation under 

any Federal or State law, or 

(iv) in the case of an account beneficiary who has attained the age specified in section 1811 of the Social 

Security Act, any health insurance other than a medicare supplemental policy (as defined in section 1882 of 

the Social Security Act). 

(D) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN MEDICAL EXPENSES INCURRED BEFORE ESTABLISHMENT OF ACCOUNT.—If a health 

savings account is established during the 60-day period beginning on the date that coverage of the account beneficiary 

under a high deductible health plan begins, then, solely for 

purposes of determining whether an amount paid is used 

for a qualified medical expense, such account shall be treated as having been established on the date that such coverage begins. 

(3) ACCOUNT BENEFICIARY.—The term ‘‘account beneficiary’’ 

means the individual on whose behalf the health savings account was established. 

(4) CERTAIN RULES TO APPLY.—Rules similar to the following 

rules shall apply for purposes of this section: 

(A) Section 219(d)(2) (relating to no deduction for rollovers). 

(B) Section 219(f)(3) (relating to time when contributions 

deemed made). 

(C) Except as provided in section 106(d), section 219(f)(5) 

(relating to employer payments). 

(D) Section 408(g) (relating to community property laws). 

(E) Section 408(h) (relating to custodial accounts). 

(e) TAX TREATMENT OF ACCOUNTS.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—A health savings account is exempt from 

taxation under this subtitle unless such account has ceased to 

be a health savings account. Notwithstanding the preceding 

sentence, any such account is subject to the taxes imposed by 

section 511 (relating to imposition of tax on unrelated business 

income of charitable, etc. organizations). 

(2) ACCOUNT TERMINATIONS.—Rules similar to the rules of 

paragraphs (2) and (4) of section 408(e) shall apply to health 

savings accounts, and any amount treated as distributed under 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
22 

such rules shall be treated as not used to pay qualified medical 

expenses. 

(f) TAX TREATMENT OF DISTRIBUTIONS.— 

(1) AMOUNTS USED FOR QUALIFIED MEDICAL EXPENSES.—Any 

amount paid or distributed out of a health savings account 

which is used exclusively to pay qualified medical expenses of 

any account beneficiary shall not be includible in gross income. 

(2) INCLUSION OF AMOUNTS NOT USED FOR QUALIFIED MEDICAL EXPENSES.—Any amount paid or distributed out of a 

health savings account which is not used exclusively to pay the 

qualified medical expenses of the account beneficiary shall be 

included in the gross income of such beneficiary. 

(3) EXCESS CONTRIBUTIONS RETURNED BEFORE DUE DATE OF

RETURN.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—If any excess contribution is contributed for a taxable year to any health savings account of an 

individual, paragraph (2) shall not apply to distributions 

from the health savings accounts of such individual (to the 

extent such distributions do not exceed the aggregate excess contributions to all such accounts of such individual 

for such year) if— 

(i) such distribution is received by the individual on 

or before the last day prescribed by law (including extensions of time) for filing such individual’s return for 

such taxable year, and 

(ii) such distribution is accompanied by the amount 

of net income attributable to such excess contribution. 

Any net income described in clause (ii) shall be included 

in the gross income of the individual for the taxable year 

in which it is received. 

(B) EXCESS CONTRIBUTION.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term ‘‘excess contribution’’ means any contribution (other than a rollover contribution described in 

paragraph (5) or section 220(f)(5)) which is neither excludable from gross income under section 106(d) nor deductible 

under this section. 

(4) ADDITIONAL TAX ON DISTRIBUTIONS NOT USED FOR QUALIFIED MEDICAL EXPENSES.— 

(A) IN GENERAL.—The tax imposed by this chapter on 

the account beneficiary for any taxable year in which there 

is a payment or distribution from a health savings account 

of such beneficiary which is includible in gross income 

under paragraph (2) shall be increased by 20 percent of 

the amount which is so includible. 

(B) EXCEPTION FOR DISABILITY OR DEATH.—Subparagraph (A) shall not apply if the payment or distribution is 

made after the account beneficiary becomes disabled within the meaning of section 72(m)(7) or dies. 

(C) EXCEPTION FOR DISTRIBUTIONS AFTER MEDICARE ELIGIBILITY.—Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to any payment or distribution after the date on which the account 

beneficiary attains the age specified in section 1811 of the 

Social Security Act. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
23 

(5) ROLLOVER CONTRIBUTION.—An amount is described in 

this paragraph as a rollover contribution if it meets the requirements of subparagraphs (A) and (B). 

(A) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) shall not apply to any 

amount paid or distributed from a health savings account 

to the account beneficiary to the extent the amount received is paid into a health savings account for the benefit 

of such beneficiary not later than the 60th day after the 

day on which the beneficiary receives the payment or distribution. 

(B) LIMITATION.—This paragraph shall not apply to any 

amount described in subparagraph (A) received by an individual from a health savings account if, at any time during 

the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt, such 

individual received any other amount described in subparagraph (A) from a health savings account which was 

not includible in the individual’s gross income because of 

the application of this paragraph. 

(6) COORDINATION WITH MEDICAL EXPENSE DEDUCTION.—For 

purposes of determining the amount of the deduction under 

section 213, any payment or distribution out of a health savings account for qualified medical expenses shall not be treated 

as an expense paid for medical care. 

(7) TRANSFER OF ACCOUNT INCIDENT TO DIVORCE.—The transfer of an individual’s interest in a health savings account to an 

individual’s spouse or former spouse under a divorce or separation instrument described in clause (i) of section 121(d)(3)(C) 

shall not be considered a taxable transfer made by such individual notwithstanding any other provision of this subtitle, and 

such interest shall, after such transfer, be treated as a health 

savings account with respect to which such spouse is the account beneficiary. 

(8) TREATMENT AFTER DEATH OF ACCOUNT BENEFICIARY.— (A) TREATMENT IF DESIGNATED BENEFICIARY IS SPOUSE.— 

If the account beneficiary’s surviving spouse acquires such 

beneficiary’s interest in a health savings account by reason 

of being the designated beneficiary of such account at the 

death of the account beneficiary, such health savings account shall be treated as if the spouse were the account 

beneficiary. 

(B) OTHER CASES.— 

(i) IN GENERAL.—If, by reason of the death of the account beneficiary, any person acquires the account 

beneficiary’s interest in a health savings account in a 

case to which subparagraph (A) does not apply— 

(I) such account shall cease to be a health savings account as of the date of death, and 

(II) an amount equal to the fair market value of 

the assets in such account on such date shall be 

includible if such person is not the estate of such 

beneficiary, in such person’s gross income for the 

taxable year which includes such date, or if such 

person is the estate of such beneficiary, in such 

beneficiary’s gross income for the last taxable year 

of such beneficiary. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
24 

(ii) SPECIAL RULES.— 

(I) REDUCTION OF INCLUSION FOR PREDEATH EXPENSES.—The amount includible in gross income 

under clause (i) by any person (other than the estate) shall be reduced by the amount of qualified 

medical expenses which were incurred by the decedent before the date of the decedent’s death and 

paid by such person within 1 year after such date. 

(II) DEDUCTION FOR ESTATE TAXES.—An appropriate deduction shall be allowed under section 

691(c) to any person (other than the decedent or 

the decedent’s spouse) with respect to amounts included in gross income under clause (i) by such 

person. 

(g) COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENT.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Each dollar amount in øsubsections (b)(2) 

and¿ subsection (c)(2)(A) shall be increased by an amount equal 

to— 

(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which such taxable 

year begins ødetermined by substituting for ‘‘calendar year 

2016’’ in subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof—¿ 

ø(i) except as provided in clause (ii), ‘‘calendar year 

1997’’, and 

ø(ii) in the case of each dollar amount in subsection 

(c)(2)(A), ‘‘calendar year 2003’’.¿ determined by substituting ‘‘calendar year 2003’’ for ‘‘calendar year 2016’’ 

in subparagraph (A)(ii) thereof. 

In the case of adjustments made for any taxable year beginning after 2007, section 1(f)(4) shall be applied for purposes of 

this paragraph by substituting ‘‘March 31’’ for ‘‘August 31’’, 

and the Secretary shall publish the adjusted amounts under 

øsubsections (b)(2) and¿ subsection (c)(2)(A) for taxable years 

beginning in any calendar year no later than June 1 of the preceding calendar year. 

(2) ROUNDING.—If any increase under paragraph (1) is not a 

multiple of $50, such increase shall be rounded to the nearest 

multiple of $50. 

(h) REPORTS.—The Secretary may require— 

(1) the trustee of a health savings account to make such reports regarding such account to the Secretary and to the account beneficiary with respect to contributions, distributions, 

the return of excess contributions, and such other matters as 

the Secretary determines appropriate, and 

(2) any person who provides an individual with a high deductible health plan to make such reports to the Secretary and 

to the account beneficiary with respect to such plan as the Secretary determines appropriate. 

The reports required by this subsection shall be filed at such time 

and in such manner and furnished to such individuals at such time 

and in such manner as may be required by the Secretary. 

* * * * * * * 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
25 

DISSENTING VIEWS 

H.R. 6306 Health Care Security Act of 2018 (Paulsen) 

H.R. 6306 (Paulsen, R–MN) increases health savings account 

(HSA) contribution limits to match the qualifying deductible and 

out-of-pocket maximum for a high-deductible health plan (HDHP) 

(for 2018, $6,650 for individuals and $13,500 for families) and allows individuals over 55 to make additional contributions (similar 

to catch-up provisions in other retirement savings accounts). The 

bill also would allow for HSA-eligible expenditures to be made in 

the 60 days prior to commencement of coverage under the HDHP. 

Individuals already struggling with medical bills do not have the 

disposable income to contribute to these tax shelters, and the increase in limits is a meaningless change that still leaves those who 

struggle to afford care without help. 

HSAs mostly benefit high-income taxpayers while doing little to 

help moderate-income families or the uninsured. Currently only 

five percent of HSA account holders contribute the annual maximum. This bill explicitly only helps the small proportion of highincome people who can best afford to save for health care expenses 

and are therefore the most likely to contribute to HSAs. Higher income filers are much more likely to establish HSAs than lower income filers-70 percent of HSA contributions come from households 

with incomes over $100,000, according to the Joint Commission on 

Taxation (JCT)—and they are also likelier to max out their contributions. Additionally, high-income individuals receive the biggest 

tax benefit for each dollar contributed to an HSA because the value 

of a tax deduction rises with an individual’s tax bracket. More than 

44 percent of Americans cannot afford a $400 emergency visit. For 

these families, it is unlikely that they have excess income to devote 

to a tax-preferred account. 

Legislation busts the deficit to benefit the wealthy, again. Alto- gether, the 11 marked up in committee would add another $92 billion in unoffset tax cuts to the deficit. Republicans’ attempts to expand HSAs (and encourage more enrollment in plans with high 

deductibles, covering very few up-front health costs) are a continuation of their platform of shifting families into health plans that 

provide fewer health benefits and higher out-of-pocket costs—while 

providing greater tax benefits for higher-income individuals and 

corporate special interests. According to 2014 Treasury data, only 

five percent of families with adjusted gross income of under 

$100,000 held money in an HSA, and those users’ average account 

balances were $1,700. 

HDHPs and HSAs do not promote healthy behavior. It is widely 

acknowledged that HSAs and HDHPs lead consumers to delay 

care. They do not encourage individuals to make better health care 

decisions, as Republicans’ ‘‘skin in the game’’ talking points assert. 

Decades of research shows that exposure to high out-of-pocket costs 

leads consumers to delay or forgo both necessary and unnecessary 

care. Delaying care and increasing costs run counter to Democratic 

policy goals of better coordinated, high-value affordable care for the 

American family. 

According to the American Hospital Association, ‘‘Hospitals and 

health systems report that increased enrollment in HDHPs over 

the past several years has reduced access to care and subjected paVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:49 Jul 20, 2018 Jkt 079006 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6604 E:\HR\OC\HR847.XXX HR847

SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS
26 

tients to costs they cannot afford. In addition, patients enrolled in 

HDHPs appear to delay care until they have reached their deductible or are in an emergency situation, which could lead to poorer 

health outcomes.’’ 

H.R. 6306 does not undo Republican sabotage, premium hikes, 

and benefit cuts they have caused over the past 18 months. This 

bill was one in a series of 11 bills this Committee marked up that 

Republicans claim will help lower health care costs for consumers. 

This legislation does not undo the disruption and sabotage the Republicans have continued to inflict on the American health care 

system. Instead of focusing on expansion of HSAs and HDHPs, 

Democrats encourage the Committee to redirect its attention to legislation that could actually ensure that uninsured, low-income, and 

vulnerable people have real access to care. For example H.R. 5155, 

sponsored by Reps. Pallone, Neal, and Scott would protect people 

with preexisting conditions, help lower premiums for Americans, 

and improve affordability of health coverage. JCT estimates the cost of this bill to be $15.3 billion over 10 

years. With this bill Republicans are adding more tax cuts and increasing the deficit. Republicans are using the deficit, which they 

keep making larger with cuts for the wealthy, to justify the deep 

cuts they plan to make to Medicare and Medicaid. Republicans already are proposing to cut Medicare and Medicaid by nearly a trillion dollars to try to pay for the tax cuts they have already enacted. 

This bill will only increase Republicans’ call for further cuts to 

these critical programs. 

Representative Doggett (D–TX) offered an amendment would require that a HDHP associated with an HSA covered under the underlying bill be offered by an issuer that does not discriminate or 

raise premiums on the basis of pre-existing conditions. This commonsense amendment was also defeated on party lines, 15–23. 

Representative Chu (D–CA) offered an amendment would allow 

individuals to use HSA funds to pay for health care expenses of minors separated from their parents by the Trump Administration 

without penalty. This compassionate amendment was also defeated 

on party lines, 16–22. 

RICHARD E. NEAL, Ranking Member. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with REPORTS