alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-111848) pertaining to the 1995 Incentive Stock Plan as amended of Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts, Inc. of our report dated January 30, 2004, except for Note 13, as to which the date is February 12, 2004, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP

 

 

 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 26, 2004
No. 00-7354.

#### Molina *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: Tammy Ritchie [drake@pwless.net] ••;'[;;",\-r'i ., >. 

Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 10:11 PM , . ,;'y^lUfilAljOi;: 

To: EAS(OST) ,.;;-i GPERATIONG 

Subject: Air travel from PQI 

m FEB ' 2 A ^0: 55 

To whom it may concern: 

I am writing to voice my opinion on the proposals involving the future of Presque Isle, l^aine air 

service. 

I have been a Merchant Marine for 36 years and travel from my home in Houlton to points all over 

the United States to meet my ship. 

Having a reliable airport in Presque Isle, which is only 42 miles from home is crucial for me and the 

many travelers in Aroostook County and parts of Canada, as well. 

I have used the Presque Isle airport every 45 days, however, the airport service has gotten very 

unreliable and I have, as of late, traveled to Bangor, 120 miles away, to fly. 

Jet service is a must at the Presque Isle airport. 

The flights are always full as is and anything smaller would be a waste of time. 

Jet service would also allow quicker service and would be more desirable, therefore attracting more 

passengers. 

The planes that have serviced Presque Isle in most recent past have been unreliable, either in service 

schedule or planes needing maintenance. 

There are also many large industries that rely on our airport and having jet service will help us keep 

the businesses we have and possibly expand businesses. 

McCain Foods, Smith and Wesson, and Louisiana Pacific, to name a few, most generally have a 

representative on the flight I am traveling. 

We are also becoming a center for World Biathlon Competition and obviously jet service is a must. 

The carrier also needs to provide a favorable terminal at Logan to make connections easier and favorable 

rates for family travel. 

Just to have a plane going into Presque Isle to fill a requirement is no help to the County - we need 

rea/service! 

Sincerely, 

Drake D. Ritchie 

fHoulton, Maine 

No virus found in this message. 

Checked by AVG - www.avq.com 

Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4763 - Release Date: 01/24/12
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Infinex Ventures Inc. (the “Company”) on 10Q SB for the period ending July 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael De Rosa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 
| Date: | September 9, 2005 |
|-------|-------------------|

 
|            | **/s/** Michael De Rosa     |
|------------|----------------------------------|
|            | (Signature)                      |
|       |                             |
| ****       | **Chief Fianancial Officer****** |
| ** ** | (Title)****                      |
|            |                             |
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 THE PBG DIRECTORS STOCK PLAN
(As Amended and Restated as of July 19, 2006)
 1.
    
    Purposes
  2.
    
    Effective Date
  3.
    
    Administration
  4.
    
    Eligibility
  5.
    
    Initial Award




---



##### 



6.
    
    Annual Stock Option Award




---



##### 



7.
    
    Annual Restricted Stock Unit Award




---



##### 



8.
    
    Annual Non-Executive Chair Restricted Stock Unit Award




---



##### 



9.
    
    Shares of Stock Subject to the Plan
  10.
    
    Deferral of Initial Awards




---



##### 



11.
    
    Dilution and Other Adjustments
  12.
    
    Effect of Misconduct
  13.
    
    Withholding Taxes and Section 409A




---



##### 



14.
    
    Resale Restrictions, Assignment and Transfer
   15.
    
    Funding
  16.
    
    Supersession of Prior Plan
  17.
    
    Duration, Amendments and Terminations




---



#####
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEFFREY WAYNE BAKER, : CIVIL NO. 3:15-CV-1675

:

Petitioner : (Judge Munley) 

v. :

:

COMMONWEALTH OF :

PENNSYLVANIA, PA STATE :

ATTORNEY GENERAL, :

:

Respondents:

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

 ORDER

AND NOW, to wit, this 6th day of October 2015, upon consideration of the

petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), and in accordance with this Court’s

Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion (Doc. 2) for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is

GRANTED.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED

without prejudice. 

3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

BY THE COURT:

s/James M. Munley

JUDGE JAMES M. MUNLEY

United States District Court

Case 3:15-cv-01675-JMM-EBC Document 5 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

January 21, 2009

Before

JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

No. 07‐3025

ZAFAR HASAN, Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern

Plaintiff‐Appellant, District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

v. No. 04 C 5690

FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, James B. Zagel, Judge.

Defendant‐Appellee.

O R D E R

The Motion for Leave to Intervene and Petition for Rehearing is treated as a

motion by a non‐party to correct the opinion.

The motion is granted.  The second sentence of Page 13, “Part B,” is amended to

read:

Those facts include Simon’s anti‐Muslim comments, Hagerman’s advice,

Mason’s warning to Jaspan about Mr. Hasan’s religion, the suspicious timing of

the downturn in his hours and evaluations following September 11, one partner’s
No. 07-3025 Page 2

testimony that Foley fired no other associates for economic reasons and did well

financially in 2001 and 2002, the Business Law Department’s treatment of its

other Muslim associates and Foley’s shifting justifications for firing Mr. Hasan.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**INFINEX VENTURES INC.**

OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of INFINEX VENTURES INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending **April 30, 2006**as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, **Michael DeRosa**, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated June 19, 2006

 
| /s/ | Michael De Rosa |
|-----|-----------------|

Michael DeRosa

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 21

                               LeCROY CORPORATION

                           Subsidiaries of the Company

    The following are the subsidiary companies of the Company as of August 1,
1999, all of which are 100% owned:

Name                                            Jurisdiction of Incorporation
----                                            -----------------------------
Digitech Industries, Inc.                       Connecticut

LeCroy, S.A.                                    Switzerland

LeCroy, Ltd.                                    England

LeCroy, G.m.b.H.                                Germany

LeCroy, S.A.R.L.                                France

LeCroy, S.R.L.                                  Italy

LeCroy Foreign Sales Corporation                U.S. Virgin Islands

LeCroy Japan Corporation                        Japan

Vigilant Networks, Inc.                         Delaware

LeCroy Corporation                              Hong Kong

LeCroy Korea Ltd.                               South Korea

Preamble Instruments, Inc.                      Delaware

                                       47
#### Anthony Ozer JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. HH-86.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 15, 1978.

Rehearing Denied April 17, 1978.

*204Michael Minerva, Public Defender, and Janice G. Scott, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Sheyin, Atty. Gen., and Michael H. Davidson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of the judgment and sentence for escape, Section 944.40, Florida Statutes (1975). Appellant contends he is entitled to reversal because of an alleged variance between the gravamen of the information and the evidence adduced at trial.

The information alleged that appellant “was lawfully confined in the Alachua County Adult Detention Center, . and being then and there so confined, did unlawfully escape from such confinement, . .” The evidence revealed that appellant was arrested and taken to the Ala-chua County Adult Detention Center. During the booking process, appellant apparently became ill and was escorted by a police officer to the emergency room of Alachua General Hospital for treatment. Appellant escaped while at the hospital. Appellant asserts there is a fatal variance because the evidence did not reveal that appellant escaped from the confinement of the Alachua County Adult Detention Center.

Section 944.40, Florida Statutes (1975), provides:

> “Any prisoner confined in any prison, jail, road camp, or other penal institution, state, county or municipal, working upon the public roads, or being transported to or from a place of confinement who escapes or attempts to escape from such confinement shall be guilty of a felony-of the second degree, . . . ”

We do not believe the term “confinement” is narrowly limited to the actual physical presence in the jail. Appellant had been committed to the jail and was in the lawful custody of the jail. This confinement may extend to the hospital from which appellant escaped. Although Sections 945.091 and 951.24, Florida Statutes (1975), specifically recognize that a prisoner may be regarded as “confined” even though not physically present in the correctional facility for the purposes of work-release programs and other rehabilitative purposes, the existence of these statutes does not require a narrow definition of the term “confinement.”

Accordingly, there was no fatal variance between the information and the evidence adduced at trial. Therefore, the judgment and sentence are AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
#### Mississippi STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. James L. BOUNDS.

No. 49631.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 28, 1977.

Bourdeaux & Jones, Thomas R. Jones, Meridian, for appellant.

Self, Bailey & Jordan, Robert W. Bailey, Meridian, for appellee.

Before SMITH, P. J., and BROOM and LEE, JJ.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

PATTERSON, C. J., INZER, P. J., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, WALKER and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ Document 102 Filed 07/01/05 Page 1 of 14
Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ Document 102 Filed 07/01/05 Page 2 of 14
Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ Document 102 Filed 07/01/05 Page 3 of 14
Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ Document 102 Filed 07/01/05 Page 4 of 14
Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ Document 102 Filed 07/01/05 Page 5 of 14
Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ Document 102 Filed 07/01/05 Page 6 of 14
Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ Document 102 Filed 07/01/05 Page 7 of 14
Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ Document 102 Filed 07/01/05 Page 8 of 14
Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ Document 102 Filed 07/01/05 Page 9 of 14
Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ Document 102 Filed 07/01/05 Page 10 of 14
Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ Document 102 Filed 07/01/05 Page 11 of 14
Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ Document 102 Filed 07/01/05 Page 12 of 14
Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ Document 102 Filed 07/01/05 Page 13 of 14
Case 4:04-cv-02688-JEJ Document 102 Filed 07/01/05 Page 14 of 14
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, George L. Riggs, III, the Chief Financial Officer of Humana Trans Services
Holding Corp. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 15, 2004

/s/ George L. Riggs, III
---------------------------
George L. Riggs, III
Chief Financial Officer



                                       30
#### THE FLORIDA BAR. In re Louis SCHONBRUN.

No. 50341.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 28, 1977.

James P. Hollaway, Asst. Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

Louis Schonbrun, in pro. per.

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court on Petition for Leave to Resign pursuant to Rule 11.08 of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar.

On the 8th day of March, 1976 The Florida Bar served its Complaint against Respondent alleging as follows:

> 1. The Respondent, Louis Schonbrun is, and at all times hereinafter mentioned was, a member of The Florida Bar, subject to the jurisdiction and disciplinary rules of the Supreme Court of Florida.

> 2. This Complaint is filed by The Florida Bar, by direction of its Board of Governors, and all conditions prerequisite to the filing of said Complaint, required by the Integration Rule, have been fulfilled.

> 3. On or about September 5, 1972, Respondent drafted a will for Albert Haber.

> 4. On or about September 5, 1972, Respondent delivered the aforementioned will to Albert Haber.

> 5. Albert Haber died on January 24, 1975.

> 6. On or about January 29, 1975, Respondent discovered that Albert Haber had not executed the aforementioned will in the presence of two witnesses.

> 7. On or about January 29, 1975, Respondent directed Albert Haber’s widow, Betty Lou Haber, to have two people sign Albert Haber’s will of September 5, 1972 as witnesses.

> 8. Respondent informed Betty Lou Haber that he could not become involved in obtaining the necessary signatures of the two persons who were to sign Albert Haber’s will.

> 9. Subsequent to Respondent’s discovery that the will lacked the signatures of two necessary witnesses, and subsequent to his directions to Betty Lou Haber to obtain two signatures as purported witnesses, Betty Lou Haber secured the signatures of Barbara Jean Graham and Zeffa Mae Staples.

> 10. Thereafter, on or about January 30, 1975, Barbara Jean Graham, in the company of Respondent’s son, attested to her signature on Albert Haber’s will of September 5, 1972.

> *88711. The September 5,1972 will of Albert Haber, with the purported witnesses’ signatures, was filed for probate on February 7, 1975.

> 12. By reason of the foregoing conduct, Respondent has violated Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(2), 1402(A)(3), 1= 102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), 1-102(A)(6), 7-102(A)(2), 7-102(A)(4), 7.402(A)(5), 7= 102(A)(6), 7-102(B)(l) and 7-102(B)(2) of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

Pending disposition of these charges Respondent filed a Petition for Leave to Resign.

The Petition for Leave to Resign is panted on the following conditions: 1. Petitioner shall pay the costs of the proceedings in the amount of Five Hundred Forty-Five Dollars and Twenty Cents ($545.20); 2. Confidentiality is hereby waived; and 3. Petitioner is hereby required to prove rehabilitation as contemplated by Rule 11.11 of the Florida Intepation Rule and Bylaws thereunder requiring successful completion of The Florida Bar examination.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C. J., and BOYD, ING-LAND, SUNDBIRQ and HATCHITT, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 44474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-22118]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than September 4, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Lacy J. Harbor, Denison, Texas; to acquire an additional 89.6 
percent, for a total of 100 percent, of the voting shares of Marble 
Falls National Bancshares, Inc., Marble Falls, Texas, and thereby 
indirectly acquire Marble Falls National Bank, Marble Falls, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 15, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-22118 Filed 8-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31.2

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                         I, BLAINE FROATS, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AEC. (the
"REGISTRANT");

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "EVALUATION DATE"); and

(c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our required evaluation as of
the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated
in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                         BY /S/ BLAINE FROATS
                            - - - -- - -- - - - -- -
                            BLAINE FROATS
                            CFO

Date: August 11, 2004
Exhibit 32


                               CERTIFICATION UNDER
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


To my knowledge, this Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended December 31,
2003,  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information  contained in this Report
fairly presents, in all material respects,  the consolidated financial condition
and results of operations of Central Bancorp, Inc.



                              By:/s/ John D. Doherty
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 John D. Doherty
                                 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



                              By:/s/ Michael K. Devlin
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Michael K. Devlin
                                 Senior Vice President, Treasurer
                                 and Chief Financial Officer


Date:  February 17, 2004